DRAFT  COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA  COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE  COMMITTEE REPORT  1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 TO: All Councilmembers FROM: Chairman Phil Mendelson Committee of the Whole DATE: May 28, 2014 SUBJECT: Report on Bill 20-749, the “Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Request Act of 2014” The Committee of the Whole, to which Bill 20-749 was referred, reports favorably thereon and recommends approval by the Council. This legislation establishes the proposed operating expenditures and capital budget authority for the District for Fiscal Year 2015. The Committees adopts the recommendations set forth by the ten committees on the Fiscal Year 2015 budget requests and the spending allocations for the respective agencies under the committees’ direct purview, except where the Committee has modified the recommendations in the committee reports through further superseding actions as set forth below. CONTENTS  I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. Background and Need Legislative Chronology Position of the Executive Comments of Advisory Neighborhood Commissions List of Witnesses Impact on Existing Law Fiscal Impact Section-by-Section Analysis Committee Action Attachments I. 1 26 26 27 27 28 29 29 32 32 BACKGROUND AND NEED  Section 442 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 798; D.C. Official Code § 1-204.42), requires the Mayor to prepare and submit to the Council an annual budget for the District. Bill 20-749, the Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Request Act of 2014, as approved by the Committee of the Whole, and subsequently passed by the Council, establishes the budget for Fiscal Year 2015 (“FY 2015”). Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 2 of 32 On December 17, 2013, the Council passed Resolution 20-367, the Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Submission Requirements Resolution of 2013. The resolution established April 3, 2014 as the date by which the Mayor was required to transmit to the Council the proposed Fiscal Year 2015 budget. Together with Bill 20-749, the Mayor also transmitted supporting legislation in the form of Bill 20-750, the Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Support Act of 2014. The Fiscal Year 2015 proposed budget and financial plan the Mayor sent to the Council made important investments in affordable housing, workforce development, public schools and infrastructure. Without this strong foundation and the cooperation and support of both the Mayor and the Chief Financial Officer, the Council would have been unable to make the changes listed below. Financing and Other The District of Columbia is a dynamic and rapidly growing city - one that looks very different than it did 20 years ago. As such, the Council felt it was important to take a fresh look at the District’s tax code and determine ways to make it more progressive, broad, and fair to District residents and businesses. Therefore, in 2011, the Council reestablished the Tax Revision Commission (“Commission”), ably headed by former Mayor Anthony Williams. Through a series of meetings during 2013, the Commission identified challenges that the District’s tax system placed on residents and businesses. Specifically, the Commission found that low and middle income residents pay a disproportionately higher share of their income in District taxes. Additionally the Commission found that the District’s business income taxes are the highest in the region and among the highest in the nation. The tax relief recommended by the Commission1 addresses each of these disparities by adjusting the personal income tax, the estate tax, business taxes, and sales taxes. As shown in the table below, the Council’s plan phases in the recommendations of the Tax Revision Commission over five years, with all of the tax relief fully funded and implemented by Tax Year 2019. The Council’s implementation plan funds the majority of the Commission’s proposals, with special focus on providing immediate relief for low and moderate income District residents. Full implementation of the entire plan will cost $165 million per year. We do not rely on triggers or hopes of increasing future revenues for full implementation. Instead, the Council reallocated existing resources to fully fund the plan. As a result, full implementation of this tax relief will not need to be paid for with the natural increase in growth of District revenues; future revenue growth will instead remain available to enhance District programs and services. 1 See DC Tax Revision Commission Final Report, May 2014. http://www.dctaxrevisioncommission.org/ DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 3 of 32 Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 PHASED IMPLEMENTATION OF TAX REFORM Council Proposed Phased Implementation Schedule FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Sales and Use Taxes Add Use Tax to Individual Income Tax Return Broadening Certain Sales Taxes Individual Income Tax Middle bracket of 40K to 60K at 7.0% Middle bracket of 40K to 60K at 6.5% Top rate at 8.95% for income above 350K New bracket of 350K to 1M at 8.75%, top rate at 8.95% for income over $1M Expansion of single EITC Raise the standard deduction (5,200 for single, 8,350 for married) Raise the standard deduction to conform with the Federal levels Increase the personal exemption to $2,200 Increase the personal exemption to $3,200 Increase the personal exemption to $4,200 to conform to the federal level Phasing out personal exemptions (at the current $1,695 level) by 1.25% for each $2500 above 150k, complete phase out at 350k Broadening the individual income tax base by eliminating expenditures Unincorporated and Incorporated Business Franchise Tax 9.4% 9.0% 8.5% 8.25% Estate Tax Raise threshold from $1M to $2M Raise threshold from $2M to $5.25M to conform to federal level As made evident in the table below, the Council’s plan adds considerable progressivity to the District’s individual income tax structure and reduces the effective tax rate for all Districtresident taxpayers from 4.9% to 4.5%. To provide considerable tax relief to lower and moderate income District workers, this plan expands the single Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), increases the personal deduction and personal exemption to federal levels and adds a new middle income tax bracket. As a direct result of these changes, residents earning between $25,000 and $50,000 will have an effective tax rate of 1.8%, and residents earning between $50,000 and $75,000 will have an effective rate of 3.5%. The expansion of the EITC to single workers will DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 4 of 32 Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 provide residents earning less than $25,000 with an even larger tax rebate, and all residents earning less than $200,000 will have an effective tax rate of less than 5%. ENHANCED PROGRESSIVITY IN THE TAX CODE AT FULL IMPLEMENTATION     Less than $ -10,000  $ -10,000 to $ - 1,000  $ - 1,000 to $ 0  $ 0 to $ 10,000  $ 10,000 to $ 25,000  $ 25,000 to $ 50,000  $ 50,000 to $ 75,000  $ 75,000 to $ 100,000  $ 100,000 to $ 200,000 $ 200,000 to $ 350,000 $ 350,000 to $ 500,000 $ 500,000 to $ 1 M.  Greater than $ 1 M.  All Taxpayers  Existing Law Average Tax Effective Tax Rate ($319) No Liability ($99) No Liability ($292) No Liability ($294) No Liability ($385) No Liability $1,022 2.8% $2,591 4.2% $4,105 4.7% $7,229 5.2% $14,829 5.8% $25,056 6.1% $41,539 6.1% $157,063 5.9% $4,247 4.9% Full Implementation Average Tax  Effective Tax Rate ($658)  No Liability ($188)  No Liability ($423)  No Liability ($435)  No Liability ($784)  No Liability $670   1.8% $2,155   3.5% $3,503   4.0% $6,528   4.7% $14,056   5.5% $24,493   6.0% $41,885   6.2% $165,411   6.2% $4,150   4.5% At full implementation, the individual income tax rates will be revised as set forth in the chart below. INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX RATES AT FULL IMPLEMENTATION   Existing Law  Taxable Income  Rate $0 to $10,000  4% $10,001 to $40,000  6% $40,001 to $350,000  8.50% $350,001 and above  8.95% Full Implementation  Taxable Income $0 to $10,000 $10,001 to $40,000 $40,001 to $60,000 $60,001 to $350,000 $350,001 to $1,000,000 $1,000,001 and above Rate  4%  6%  6.50%  8.50%  8.75%  8.95%  In order to help District businesses compete and thrive in a region with very porous borders, the Commission recommended, and the Council is implementing, a reduction of the Incorporated and Unincorporated Business Franchise Tax to 8.25%, the same rate as Maryland’s and competitive with Virginia’s 6% rate. The rate will be reduced in phases, and will reach Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 5 of 32 8.25% by Tax Year 2019. The Council erred on the side of conformity with the federal tax code when deciding to phase-in increases to the threshold for the Estate Tax. The District will also conform to the federal threshold of $5.25 million by Tax Year 2018. Below is a more detailed summary of the tax relief that is provided in the Council’s plan to implement the recommendations of the Commission. The following tax changes will become effective January 1, 2015: Individual Income Taxes 1. Further reducing2 the rate on the new individual income tax middle bracket of $40,000 - $60,000 to 7.0% 2. Expand the local EITC to single workers 3. Raise the standard deduction to $5,200 for singles, $8,350 for married residents 4. Eliminate certain tax expenditures3 5. Phase out the personal exemption by 2% for each $2,500 above $150,000, with a complete phase out at $275,000 Sales and Use Taxes 6. Add a line to capture the use tax on the personal income tax return 7. Broaden the general sales tax to certain services4 8. Unify taxation on tobacco products5 Business Taxes6 9. Exempt passive investment vehicles from Unincorporated Business Franchise Tax 10. Reduce the Unincorporated and Incorporated Business Franchise Tax to 9.4% 11. Change the franchise tax apportionment method to a single weighted sales formula In addition to the tax relief granted in 2015, the following tax relief will be effective January 1, 2016: Individual Income Taxes 1. Further reduce the rate on the new individual income tax middle bracket of $40,000 $60,000 from 7.0% to 6.5% 2 The Mayor’s proposed FY 2015 Budget and Financial Plan created the new individual income tax bracket at a rate of 7.5%. The Council’s plan further reduces that bracket to 7.0% in 2015. 3 The Commission recommended eliminating the DC Homebuyer Credit, the Low Income Credit, the Long Term Care Insurance Credit and the Government Pension Exclusion. 4 The Commission recommended expanding the sales tax to water consumption for home, storage of household goods/mini storage, carpet and upholstery cleaning, health clubs and tanning studios, car washes, and bowling alleys and billiard parlors. 5 The Council is adopting this proposal, which was initially recommended in the Mayor’s proposed FY 2015 Budget and Financial Plan. 6 The Council is adopting these proposals, which were initially recommended in the Mayor’s proposed FY 2015 Budget and Financial Plan. Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 6 of 32 2. Reduce the individual income tax rate to 8.75% for those earning between $350,000 and $1M per year. The tax rate will remain at 8.95% for those earning over $1M per year. Business Taxes 3. Further Reduce Unincorporated and Incorporated Business Franchise Tax to 9% Estate Tax 4. Raise threshold from $1M to $2M In addition to the tax relief granted in 2015 and 2016, the following tax relief will be effective January 1, 2017: Individual Income Taxes 1. Further raise the standard deduction to $6,100 for single residents and $12,200 for married residents to conform to the federal level 2. Increase the personal exemption to $2,200 In addition to the tax relief granted in 2015, 2016 and 2017, the following tax relief will be effective January 1, 2018: Individual Income Taxes 1. Further increase the personal exemption to $3,200 Business Taxes 2. Further reduce the Unincorporated and Incorporated Business Franchise Tax from 9.0% to 8.75% Estate Tax 3. Further raise threshold from $2M to $5.25M to conform to the federal level In addition to the tax relief granted in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, the following tax relief will be effective January 1, 2019: Individual Income Tax 1. Increase the personal exemption to $4,200 to conform to the federal level Unincorporated and Incorporated Business Franchise Tax 2. Further reduce the Unincorporated and Incorporated Business Franchise Tax from 8.5% to 8.25% To fund implementation of the Commission’s proposals over the next five years, the Council’s plan adjusts the upcoming proposed streetcar paygo transfer from a fixed to a floating base year. In FY 2016, the District is scheduled to implement a paygo provision whereby each year, 25% of the increase in the District’s revenues over FY 2015 levels will be dedicated to support construction of the new streetcar system. The Capital Policy and Reserve Account Amendment Act of 2014 will instead implement this provision starting in FY 2017. The Act also modifies the proposed calculation so that 25% of the increase in the District’s revenues over the previous year, rather than a locked-in baseline of FY 2015, is dedicated to support construction of the new streetcar system. Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 7 of 32 While the Council agrees with the importance of employing paygo to decrease the District’s reliance on borrowed capital, it must be sustainable and not foreclose future growth. Without this proposed change, by 2018 the operating funds set aside for the streetcar project would roughly equal the District’s annual revenue growth, and by 2020 the paygo transfer to streetcars would be more than double the District’s annual revenue growth. Over the next ten years, this provision would have set aside $3 billion for the construction of streetcars. This is not sustainable, nor is it the best use of District resources. The Council, while supportive of the Streetcar initiative, remains concerned about the amount of funding being diverted from the operating budget to pay for the system. Setting aside such a large portion of operating funds prevents implementation of other worthy programs and initiatives, such as the broad based tax relief for District residents and businesses proposed by the Commission. The Council proposes to maintain the planned 6-year, $400 million investment in the streetcar project, and dedicate $45 - $65 million of operating funds to the project annually. This amount of funding is consistent with annual budget allotments that the project has received over the past 7 years and exceeds what DDOT has been able to spend. The recommendations of the Tax Revision Commission are not the only tax relief being funded in the Council’s FY 2015 budget. The Council is modifying the relief provided by the Senior Citizen Real Property Tax Relief Act of 2013 to instead provide relief for low-income seniors regardless of whether they own or rent their homes. As such, the Council is expanding of the Schedule H for senior renters over the age of 70, who have an adjusted gross income of less than $60,000 per year. The Schedule H provides a tax credit for both homeowners and renters, whose property taxes exceed a certain percentage of their income. The Council also provided for interest-free deferral of real property taxes for older, low-income District residents. With these changes, thousands of low-income seniors across the District will see immediate and impactful tax relief. In order to improve budget transparency, the Council is adding to the BRA a request that Congress enact into law the Contingency Cash Reserve Transparency Amendment Act of 2008. This legislation, which was introduced by then-Chairman Gray and unanimously passed by the Council, would impose more meaningful guiderails on the use of the Contingency Cash Reserve Fund (“Contingency Fund”). The Contingency Fund is one of two funds established in the Home Rule Act to provide reserves for urgent, unexpected funding needs, such as those that might be follow natural disasters or terrorist attacks. In FY 2014, the District made good use of the Contingency Fund to keep the government running while federal gridlock resulted in a lapse of other appropriations. However, the Contingency Fund has increasingly been tapped to fund expenditures that do not appear to meet the spirit of the law. The Home Rule Act states that the Contingency Fund may only be used for “nonrecurring or unforeseen” needs, and the CFO must certify “the impact of the proposed allocation on the balance and integrity” of the fund. Yet, in recent years, the fund Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 8 of 32 has been used to pay for a broad range of expenses, such as providing new Supercans to all residents, funeral subsidies, painting privately-owned taxicabs, hiring of additional FTEs, promotion of existing FTEs, feasibility studies, and procurement reform. Although any one of these expenditures may represent prudent policy, the District’s policymaking body – the Council – is deprived of any opportunity to approve or disapprove such initiatives. Under the Home Rule Act, it is the Council’s responsibility to ensure, after the fact, that the fund is replenished within two years of the expenditures. Thus, there exists a structural flaw regarding the Contingency Fund, wherein the Mayor may spend funds for any “nonrecurring or unforeseen” uses, without any legislative check on that expense. Unlike reprogrammings, there is no Council review required before funds may be spent from the Contingency Fund. Recognizing these flaws, then-Chairman Gray, in 2008, crafted legislation to restrict the use of the fund to needs which are “nonrecurring and unforeseen. The act also provides for a Council review period for any proposed expenditures, preserving the legislature’s power of the purse. But, because the act would require an amendment to the Home Rule Act to become law, it is subject to enactment by Congress. The Council’s position has not changed since the act was passed. Congress should enact the Contingency Cash Reserve Transparency Amendment Act of 2008 pursuant to the fundamental principles of separation of powers and in the interest of transparent budgeting. As mentioned previously, Capital Policy and Reserve Account Amendment Act of 2014 also requires the CFO to prepare a 15-year capital replacement schedule that defines the major assets and repairs that need to be done during the next 15 years, when those major renovations and replacements need to occur and how much they will cost. This subtitle also requires that any unspent debt service be used as paygo to offset future capital borrowing. To account for, and dedicate, certain potential revenues that may be received in fiscal year 2014 or 2015, the Council is establishing a non-lapsing IPW Fund to support Destination DC with planning and hosting the U.S. Tourism Association’s annual international tourism conference. Of the amount received from a settlement with online travel companies to recover unpaid hotel-room, $5 million will be deposited into the IPW Fund taxes, provided that the private sector will match this amount. The remainder of any funds received from the settlement shall be deposited in a new WMATA Momentum Support Fund. Finally, the Council is backing a number of real property tax abatements to support affordable housing and non-profit institutions in the District by funding the following legislation: United House of Prayer Equitable Tax Relief Act, the Meridian International Center Real Property Tax Exemption Act, the Scottish Rite Temple Real Property Tax Act, the American Academy of Achievement Real Property Tax Exemption Act, and all real property tax abatements and refunds that were originally proposed in the Mayor’s budget. Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 9 of 32 Human Support The Council believes strongly in funding important and effective programs that address basic human needs. Thus, the Council is addressing key threats to the well-being of District residents, including the ongoing family homelessness and affordable housing crises, the crippling effect of chronic diseases, and the health and mental needs of District youth. In the area of Human Services, the Council is investing significant resources in programs proven effective in responding to both individual and family homelessness. In the FY 2014 budget, the Council funds to pilot the successful Rapid Re-Housing Program for homeless individuals. With the success shown to date, the Council is adding $1.5 million in FY 2015 to continue and expand this pilot program. To provide immediate assistance for homeless individuals, the Council is fully funding a coordinated entry system to reduce bureaucracy and better match housing and services to that population. To further address the needs of homeless individuals, the Council is approving funding to conduct a feasibility study on the population of the District’s largest individual homeless shelter – the Center for Creative Non-Violence (“CCNV”). This study will help the District understand what resources are needed fix the conditions at the shelter, and where those resources must be targeted to further assist these individuals. During the most recent hypothermia season, the District saw a tremendous uptick in the number of homeless families seeking shelter. As such, the Council is adding $5.3 million in permanent housing support for homeless families. To assist these families in finding stable housing and getting the services they need to emerge from their homelessness, the Council identified $2.3 million to expand the Permanent Supportive Housing Program at the Department of Human Services (“DHS”). These additional funds will ensure that those homeless families most in need find the housing they require and the services they need to prevent future homelessness. The Council also added $3 million to the tenant-based Local Rent Supplement Program (“LRSP”) specifically for homeless families, and those at risk of becoming homeless. LRSP is an effective housing program that assists very low-income families who may not need the intensive services of the Permanent Supportive Housing program, but still need affordable housing. Through rental subsidies, this program allows families to find, or maintain, stable housing in order to emerge from, or prevent future homelessness. Currently, adults who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless face significant hurdles in obtaining Social Security Income (“SSI”) and Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”), even if they are eligible. The application process for SSI/SSDI is complicated and difficult to navigate resulting in fewer than 15% of qualified homeless individual obtaining benefits from their initial application. To assist these individuals, the Council identified $500,000 to fund an SSI/SSDI Outreach, Access, and Recovery (“SOAR”) program. SOAR is a national project that has proven successful at assisting high-risk individuals in obtaining SSI/SSDI benefits they are eligible for more quickly. In fact, in Tennessee, 96% of applicants supported by the SOAR program successfully obtained SSI/SSDI benefits in an average of two months. Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 10 of 32 As increasing numbers of homeless families presented for shelter this past winter, an alarming number, close to 50%, were headed by people under the age of 24. Youth-headed households, along with young homeless individuals, face additional barriers to emerge from homelessness. The Council therefore is funding several key provisions of the End Youth Homelessness Act of 2014. With the addition of $1.3 million at the DHS, the Council is funding 10 transitional beds and 5 emergency shelter beds for youth aged 24 and younger. This funding further supports a youth intake center to ensure coordination between housing and service needs. The enhancement will also allow for completion of a youth census and for street outreach in order to identify and assist vulnerable youth. Data show that sheltering homeless households costs the city $150 per night. While investments in emergency shelter are critical, the District must also invest in methods that prevent households from entering the shelter system in the first place. By investing in efforts to prevent homelessness, the District not only keeps people in their homes, but can reinvest some shelter resources into services for households most in need. Therefore, the Council is using $2 million to fund the Homeless Prevention Program Establishment Act of 2014 to implement prevention efforts that have proven successful in other jurisdictions. For example, New York City currently runs a prevention program called Homebase. These targeted prevention efforts, administered from locations throughout the city, provide at-risk households with services such as family or tenant mediation, household budgeting, emergency rental assistance, job training and placement, and advocacy for public benefits like public health insurance, tax credits, and SNAP. A recent, 27-month study of the program tracked 295 families, half of whom received services from Homebase, and half who did not. The result: Homebase was able to cut the number of households in the study who applied for shelter by half (18.2% applying for shelter in the control group compared to 9.3% who interacted with Homebase). According to the Helping Families Home Roadmap, an Interagency Council on Homelessness subcommittee has met twice to discuss program design, which should be completed by August 1st. With the funding identified by the Council, the District can begin to address the underlying cause of homelessness and avoid the consequences of entering the shelter system. In another action to prevent District residents from becoming homeless, the Council is increasing funding by $500,000 to the Emergency Rental Assistance Program (“ERAP”). This program provides critical, short-term assistance to individuals and households at risk of becoming homeless by giving them the opportunity to address immediate problems without the additional concern of losing their home. Although the Council invested significant resources in the prevention of homelessness and connecting homeless families with housing, the District must always maintain a safe and effective emergency shelter system. Currently, conditions at the DC General Family Shelter require significant improvements to both improve the quality of life, and assist families in moving out of the shelter system. To assist the families at DC General, and more quickly move them into affordable and stable housing, the Council added $600,000 to hire 10 Family Case Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 11 of 32 Managers specifically for the DC General population. With intensive, direct case management at DC General, the District can more quickly assess families, identify the services they need, and enroll them in the most appropriative and effective programs. One of those programs is related to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (“TANF”) Amendment Act, passed by the Council in 2011. Under federal rules, households may only receive TANF benefits for a maximum of 60 months. However, the District continually provided benefits to recipients beyond the 60-month time period through locally funded resources. To help incentivize these long term TANF recipients to find full and steady employment, the Council and the Mayor agreed to begin a gradual step-down of these benefits. Recognizing that certain households face unique circumstances that require remaining on TANF, the Council passed exemptions to the time limit during the FY 2014 budget. The Council also increased eligibility for the POWER program to provide temporary relief from TANF work requirements for households facing short term difficulties. By enrolling in POWER, households continue to receive benefits and also have the clock stopped on their 60 month count. For FY 2015, the Council is directing funding to provide additional POWER eligibility – to mothers with children under six months of age. By ensuring new mothers continue receiving their full TANF benefits, the Council is protecting children and allowing families a starting point on the path to self-sufficiency. In addition to the financial assistance provided by TANF, the District also administers the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (“SNAP”). SNAP provides low-income residents assistance with purchasing groceries. However, thousands of residents, including many seniors, receive less than $30 per month in benefits. To increase food security for District residents, the Council identified $1.3 million to create a locally funded SNAP enhancement. With this funding, any resident receiving SNAP benefits of less than $30 per month will receive additional assistance to bring his or her total benefit to $30. The Council also remains committed to meeting the public health needs of all District residents. This includes tackling the devastating impact of chronic diseases like cancer and diabetes. To achieve this goal, the Council identified $717,000 in the Department of Health (“DOH”) for enhancements to programs that combat the impact of chronic disease. As a result of this funding, DOH can expand and improve its efforts to lessen the burden for people living with a variety of diseases through additional screenings, educational campaigns, and public health services. The Council also remains committed to providing residents with the tools and resources needed to address their tobacco addiction. Tobacco consumption, and the resulting health impacts, continues to affect thousands of residents across the District. Therefore, the Council added $2 million in funding for the Tobacco Control program within DOH. These additional resources will support ongoing and successful tobacco cessation efforts including the Tobacco Quitline, education campaigns, and community outreach. Providing public health services to all District residents remains a top priority for the Council. The Not-for-Profit Hospital Corporation, commonly referred to as United Medical Center (“UMC”), is the District’s only acute care hospital on the city’s East End. The hospital Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 12 of 32 also houses a skilled nursing facility and a state-of-the art Pediatric Emergency Room run in partnership with Children’s National Medical Center. Since taking control of the operations of the hospital in 2010, the District has invested millions of dollars to improve operations and services. Although progress has been made in improving hospital operations, the District remains committed to moving control of the hospital to a private partner. Therefore, the Council supported the Mayor’s $12.7 million contract with Huron to develop and implement a turnaround plan for UMC. Huron formalized a strategic plan that won UMC Board approval in August of 2013. In addition to patient, doctor, and service related changes, the plan calls for significant capital improvements. In achieving these capital improvement goals, Huron states that “UMC facilities are in relatively good condition” and that “investments to make the facilities competitive without other District providers could differentiate UMC and attract [Primary Service Area] PSA residents.” Although the plan discusses building a new facility, it specifically details capital improvements at the current UMC hospital in both facilities, equipment, information technology, as well as routine and deferred maintenance over the next four to five years at a cost of $155 million – well below the projected $335 million cost of a new facility. The strategic vision makes it clear that “prompt District action [is required] to make UMC attractive to a partner” but “the District should defer substantial strategic facility and equipment investment prior to securing a partner.” Additionally, in testimony given during their Budget oversight hearings, the Department of Health Care Finance and UMC provided inconsistent answers regarding the use of the $335 million in capital funds for the new hospital facility. According to UMC, none of the capital money allocated for FY 2014 had been spent and that District officials alone came up with the $300 million amount for constructing a new hospital. Given the advice provided by Huron to achieve their strategic goals through $155 million of capital improvements at the current UMC facility, the Council disagrees with the Mayor’s proposal to spend over $300 million on a new hospital facility. With no strategic partner identified, and inconsistent responses on the actual cost of building a new facility, the Council believes it is unwise to invest in a new hospital at this time. The Council remains committed to providing the best and most extensive medical services available, to all residents of the city, especially on the East End. That is why the Council is following the advice of the hired turnaround consultants, and fully funding the $155 million in capital investments necessary to improve the current UMC facility, attract an operating partner, rebrand UMC, encourage more residents to utilize the facility’s services, and improve patient services. In addition to the health needs of the District writ large, the Council is committed to addressing the growing physical and mental health issues facing our youth. In 2012, the Council unanimously passed the “South Capitol Street Memorial Amendment Act” to specifically address the growing mental health needs of District youth. A key component of this legislation centers on the expansion of the School-Based Mental Health Program which provides direct programs and services to kids where they spend most of their time – at school. Each year, the Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 13 of 32 Council has identified additional funding to continue the expansion of this vital program. This year, the Council is funding an additional six social workers, on top of the funding for the 23 new staff for the program identified by the Council for FY 2014. Students face unique social issues as well. Although teen pregnancy is on the decline, it continues to have immediate and lasting impacts on young women and men across the District. Through both public and private funding, a number of critical and successful programs currently assist teens in preventing pregnancy. However, much of the private money dedicated to these efforts has been disappearing. The Council believes that more work is needed despite the success achieved in recent years in reducing the rate of teen pregnancy. Therefore, the Council is providing $2 million for a teen pregnancy prevention fund for the continuation of successful programs. There also continues to be a rise in the rates of concussions and traumatic brain injury among kids both locally and nationally. Children, whose brains are constantly developing, risk more permanent damage when they suffer a concussion. However, hospitals which treat children in the District do not currently implement best practices for treating concussions. The Health Information Technology Solutions (“H.I.T.S.”) for Kids is a national model for concussion care. The Council identified $480,000 for a competitive grant to develop H.I.T.S. for Kids here in the District. Through the development of a comprehensive concussion care protocol, the District can ensure that children who have a concussion receive the emergency, follow-up, and long-term care necessary to make a full recovery. While youth comprise a special population in need of focused services, the Council also believes in improving the quality of life and government responsiveness of the District’s older residents. Over the past several years, the Council has continually made enhanced investments at the Office on Aging (“DCOA”) in order to provide the best, and most extensive, set of services to District seniors. This year, the Council is increasing the budget for DCOA by $1.25 million. These additional funds will ensure that seniors have access to a robust and well-functioning transportation system. In addition, these funds allow DCOA to provide critical enhancements for grants given to the multitude of outstanding providers throughout the city. The Council is committed to investment in our parks and recreation centers to provide children, families, and seniors access to active recreation opportunities. As a demonstration of that commitment, the Council is increasing Department of Parks and Recreation (“DPR”) capital spending by $25.675 million in FY 2015 and $43.775 million for the next 6 years. Among the projects funded is a Community/Recreation Center in Ivy City, which will be located in the Crummell School. The District’s only Therapeutic Recreation Center, which serves people with disabilities and is located in the Greenway neighborhood, will be modernized. The facility has not received an extensive renovation since it was built in 1971. The Chevy Chase and Fort Davis Recreation Centers will also be modernized. Hearst Park will be improved and an outdoor pool will be built in Ward 3. An additional $14.5 million was added to the Department of Transportation budget to transform the old unused span of the 11th Street Bridge into a signature, elevated park for the District—a park comparable to the High Line in Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 14 of 32 New York City. Spanning the Anacostia River, the park would link Historic Anacostia with the Navy Yard. Preliminary plans include bike and pedestrian trails, outdoor performance spaces, play areas, gardens, information about the river and its ecosystem, and a dock to launch boats and kayaks. In an effort to provide extra enrichment for economically disadvantaged children and encourage both the use of green spaces in the District, the Council has added $250,000 to fund a grant to update Kenilworth Parkside Community Park and $75,000 to support the Summer Food Services program for low-income children participating in summer programming provided by DPR. To support the personnel needs of DPR’s Therapeutic Recreation Center, Small Parks, and Community Gardens programs, the Council shifted eight vacant recreation specialist positions from other recreation programs in DPR. Public Education For Fiscal Year 2015, the Council continues its unwavering support to improve public education for all District children. The Council strongly believes that adequate funding for public education is imperative to improving social outcomes for youth across the city. Only with a robust and comprehensive public education system can we provide all youth with an equal opportunity to succeed. In an effort to provide this adequate funding, the Council unanimously approved, and the Mayor signed, the Fair Student Funding and School Based Budgeting Act of 2013. School budgets are based on the Uniform per Student Funding Formula (UPSFF), which determines the annual operating budget for both traditional and charter public schools by starting with a base level funding per student, and adding weights based on characteristics of the school’s student population (grade level, special education, adult learners, etc.). However, the Council concluded that the UPSFF weights failed to provide sufficient funding for students at particular risk for academic failure. Therefore, the Fair Student Funding and School Based Budgeting Act added a weight to the UPSFF for at-risk students. At-risk students include those who are homeless, in the foster care system, qualified for TANF, qualified for SNAP, or are high school students one-year older than the expected age for the grade in which they are enrolled. The goal of this addition was to ensure that schools with at-risk students had the funding needed to provide critical supports and services for these students. In formulating the FY 2015 budget for both District of Columbia Public Schools (“DCPS”) and DC Public Charter Schools (“DCPCS”), the Mayor included a version of the atrisk weight that resulted in $77 million of additional funding for 37,000 students at DCPS and DCPCS. However, the Mayor simultaneously eliminated the weight for summer school, causing a decrease of $35.5 million. As a result, the public education system saw an overall increase of only $42 million to meet the needs of the identified “at-risk” students. The Fair Student Funding and School Based Budgeting Act requires this “at-risk” funding to follow the student, meaning that any additional funds were to go directly to the schools where these students enrolled. Instead, DCPS chose to use some of its at-risk funds to support a number of initiatives that assist Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 15 of 32 at-risk students generally, while other funds were diverted to different priorities. While these priorities are worthwhile, the Council intended these funds to go to the schools so they could be used to directly benefit those students identified as at-risk. Therefore, the Council, in consultation with DCPS and the Office of the State Superintendent for Education (“OSSE”) identified the projected number of at-risk students enrolled at each school. Through savings identified throughout DCPS, the Council is able to restore $3.6 million to the budgets of 35 schools. These 35 schools received less than half their allotted at-risk funding as a result of DCPS’s allocation of the at-risk funding. Additionally, the Council provides $1.4 million to those charter schools that lost significant funding for their successful summer school programs because of the elimination of this weight. Another way the District reaches vulnerable youth is through implementation of the federal McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act. Under this law, state education agencies must ensure that each homeless youth has access to the same free public school and public preschool education as youth with a home. In order to meet the critical goals of the legislation, the Council added $200,000 and two FTEs to support the McKinney-Venter Coordinator at OSSE. Increased funding allows for additional outreach and interventions for homeless youth in the public education system. In the area of early childhood education, the Council continues to enthusiastically endorse the Mayor’s efforts to provide quality, universal education to young children. During FY 2014, OSSE increased the child care subsidy provider rate by 15% and created 200 additional child care slots. The Council, in support of this initiative, found the $2.3 million required to fully fund the existing, and 200 additional, slots that OSSE created last year. To promote improvements in lifetime academic achievement and health, the Council is adding another $3.3 million to OSSE for the implementation of the Healthy Tots Act of 2014. More than a fifth of all children in the United States under the age of five are overweight or obese, and the figures in the District – which has one of the highest rates of child obesity in the nation – are believed to be even worse. The personal and societal costs associated with this situation are significant. To combat overweight and obesity in the District’s toddlers, the Healthy Tots Act establishes nutritional standards for qualifying preschools and assists them in qualifying for meals that can be reimbursed by the federal government. Adult learners are an important part of the District’s public education population. Often, these students face additional barriers to academic success, including undiagnosed learning disabilities. Therefore, the Council is providing $340,000 for OSSE to conduct learning disability assessments and diagnoses for adult learners. By identifying potential barriers, the District can better meet the needs of these adult learners and provide them the skills and services necessary to achieve academic success. The Council believes that providing comprehensive, coordinated services and programs increases student outcomes by lowering the barriers that prevent academic success. To achieve Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 16 of 32 this goal, the Council approved the Community Schools Incentive Act of 2012. The goal of the Community Schools program is to integrate academics, health and social services, youth and community development, and community engagement. The Council provided $1 million in funding in FY2014 in support of Community Schools program. Although the Mayor did not provide funding in Fiscal Year 2015, the Council is directing $1 million to continue the success of this vital program. To continue the ongoing work of modernizing and renovating schools throughout the District, the Council amends the Mayor’s proposed Capital Improvement Plan to align capital funding with those schools most in need. For Fiscal Year 2015, the Council provided additional funding at Goding Elementary School (School-Within-a-School), Logan Elementary School, Marie Reed Elementary School, Murch Elementary School, Orr Elementary School, and Watkins Elementary School. In an ongoing effort to improve educational outcomes at the middle school level, the Council also provides planning funds for an application middle school in Ward 7. Finally, the Council provides additional capital funding in FY 2016 for the modernization of Eliot-Hine Junior High School. The Council continues its support for the only public college in the District, the University of the District of Columbia (“UDC”). Through the academic programs at the University’s flagship campus, the nationally recognized clinical program at the David A. Clarke School of Law, and job training programs at the Community College, UDC continues to meet the higher education and workforce training needs of District residents. For FY 2015, the Council increased the District’s subsidy to the University by $1.475 million for enhancements to the university’s Banner financial system, investments in communications and marketing including community outreach, donor recognition programs and training, and support for regional and specialized accreditation including engineering lab equipment and computer software licenses. The Council is again providing $1 million in matching funds for the University to assist with their reaccreditation activities.   Public Works The Council’s modifications to the Mayor’s proposed budget for the Public Works cluster show the legislature’s continued efforts to invest in viable infrastructure and environmental preservation that encourages and supports the District’s long-term economic and population growth. In FY 2015, this was achieved by the Council’s careful realignment of resources to find cost efficiency savings, while sustaining key transportation and environmental initiatives pivotal to the District’s future. The budget realignments made by the Council look not only to preserve, but to bolster the District as an attractive and progressive urban center that accommodates both visitors and residents alike. The Council was able to identify $7.7 million in non-personal cost savings, primarily from District Department of Transportation (“DDOT”) and Department of Public Works (“DPW”), to fund various Council priorities. Overall, DDOT was reduced by $2.4 million, with Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 17 of 32 96 percent of that reduction ($2.3 million) from contracting and energy-efficiency savings. DPW was decreased by $3.5 million, which included $2 million that would have been used for the 5year Supercan replacement process. Since the Mayor completed the full Supercan replacement process in FY 2014 using the Contingency Cash Reserve Fund, DPW no longer needs to operate that process for FY 2015 and beyond, making available those funds for other imperative uses. Additionally, the Council converted the 4-year $5.2 million Ward 8 Streetscape project, which the Mayor’s proposed budget had designated under the FY 2015 operating budget, and moved it to the Capital Budget where similar projects have previously been housed. This realignment freed up $1.3 million in FY 2015 operating funds to be reallocated among various Council priorities. The sum of all funding reallocations pulled from cost savings across the cluster allowed for the Council to act on transportation, environmental, and public works initiatives crucial to the District. Transportation initiatives represent more than half of the Council’s budget reallocations within this cluster, at $3.3 million. To mitigate issues of coordination, functionality, and integration regarding the pending Transportation Reorganization Act, the Council is setting aside $500,000 to develop a transition plan on how best to bring DDOT, DPW, the Department of Motor Vehicles (“DMV”) and the District of Columbia Taxicab Commission (“DCTC”) under a single authority. Moreover, the Council is funding the implementation of the Traffic Adjudication Act to be administered by the DMV in an effort to provide a fairer and more customer-friendly ticket adjudication process. This funding comprises $559,000 to add five hearing examiner positions and a DMV Ombudsman. In a related move to ease transportation and traffic burdens, the Council is shifting $294,000 to add five new Traffic Control Officer positions to DDOT. And, in order to delay a scheduled fare increase in FY 2015, $1.45 million is being redirected to freeze the Circulator bus fare at $1 for one year. The District’s expectations for reliable passenger rail options continue to increase, especially as the population in the District and region continue to grow and more District residents are choosing not to drive. In anticipation of future needs and sustainable growth, the Council is investing $500,000 in the development of a Comprehensive Rail Plan that will build a strategy to determine how best to move forward in regards to rail-based transit. To bolster the District’s green programs and sustainable policies, the Council is directing an additional $2.1 million to various environmental initiatives in the District. Of this total, $1 million will be used to create two new offices: the Office of Electronic Waste Recycling under the District Department of the Environment (“DDOE”) and the Office of Waste Diversion under DPW. These divisions will help implement the Waste Management Modernization Amendment Act of 2014. Additionally, recycling education programs and grants will receive a $200,000 enhancement in an effort to increase accessibility and improve waste diversion rates throughout the District. DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 18 of 32 Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 To address environmental health issues, the Council is restoring $525,000, and associated personnel, to the Lead and Healthy Housing program, which was eliminated in the Mayor’s proposed FY 2015 budget. DDOE is receiving $165,000 to implement the Air Quality Amendment Act, which will establish a licensing program for the removal and remediation of mold, a critical element in the District’s fight against asthma. In a consolidation of programs, and in order to deliver smarter and more effective services, the Department of Health’s Wildlife Rehabilitation program and associated funding of $200,000 is being transferred to DDOE to be incorporated into DDOE’s established Fisheries and Wildlife program. This year the Mayor proposed an $884 million 6-year capital budget for the H St/Benning/K St Streetcar project and federal Streetcars project. The budget is $523 million more than what was proposed for FY 2014-2019, and easily dwarfs that of any other project in the capital improvement program. As much as $740 million of project funding would be diverted from future operating budgets. The funding mechanism proposed for the project would divert as much as $3 billion, an average of $300 million per year, from the operating budget over the next 10 years for the Streetcar and Circulator systems. While the Council is supportive of the Streetcar initiative, it is also concerned about the amount of funding being diverted from the operating budget and the impact this would have on other worthy programs and initiatives. The Council is also concerned about DDOT’s capacity to effectively manage the project. Given these concerns, it would not be prudent to double the project budget. The Council’s budget would maintain a 6-year, $400 million investment in Streetcar capital projects (federal and local funds), give priority to the H Street Line, dedicate $45 to $65 million of operating funds to the projects annually, and supplement the dedicated funding stream with other paygo or GO/IT bond financing, as needed. This amount of funding is consistent with annual budget allotments that the project has received in recent years and exceeds DDOT’s annual spending on streetcar projects to date. Below is a table showing annual budget allotments and expenditures for streetcar projects[1]. Fiscal Year FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 [1] STREETCAR BUDGET Allotment Expenditures $13,000,000.00 $530,494.25 $0.00 $1,090,430.67 $14,544,202.00 $269,946.86 $0.00 $3,157,482.49 $15,447,212.76 $7,270,080.75 $37,713,692.00 $5,440,967.34 Includes WMATA project SA306C-Streetcar and DDOT projects SA306C-H St/Benning/K St Line, STC00AStreetcars, STC12A-Union Station to Washington Circle, CM080A-Streetcar NEPA-Benning Rd, and CM081AStreetcar NEPA-MLK Ave. DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 19 of 32 Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 through 5/25/14 Total $26,585,115.45 $44,015,357.97 $9,659,737.16 $40,623,129.55 $62,999,999.90 $41,716,333.21 $214,305,580.08 $109,758,602.28 Current Unspent Allotment $104,546,977.80 As DDOT’s Chief Engineer has indicated, streetcar tracks on the H Street bridge over the Amtrak rail lines are temporary because the bridge must be replaced within the next three to five years. Therefore, the Council is also adding $187 million of funding to the H St/Benning/K St Line project to be used as a local match for full replacement of the bridge. The Council directs the Mayor to amend the regional Transportation Improvement Program to include full replacement of the bridge so that federal financial assistance can be made available for full replacement of the bridge by fiscal year 2018. Finally, the Council urges the Mayor to restore confidence in DDOT’s ability to manage the project and provide the following:  The aerial wire plan required to expand streetcar system beyond the current H Street line (§ 9-1171 and § 9-1173 of the DC Code).  A car barn plan that will describe how sites will be selected and how communities will participate in designing the facilities. The plan should also address how to avoid the expense of building temporary facilities and the additional expense of building permanent facilities over active streetcar lines.  A bridge replacement plan that will identify bridge replacements needed along the planned streetcar lines and address how the District can minimize the cost of temporary track placement and the impact bridge replacements will have on streetcar service. Economic Development and Regulation With economic development activities being a key driver of the District’s strong growth, the Council is increasing the funds within the Economic Development and Regulation cluster, directing the additional funding to affordable housing, employment, and business development initiatives. Affordable housing continues to be a top priority for the Council. In support of that priority, the Council is directing an additional $4.3 million to the Department of Housing and Community Development (“DHCD”) for the development of affordable senior housing. This Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 20 of 32 amount will also fund a pilot project to study how best to develop affordable housing and wraparound services for the District’s LGBT seniors. To support housing for low- and moderate-income residents, the Council is adding $1 million to the Home Purchase Assistance Program (“HPAP”), a key tool for improving homeownership in the District. In recognition of the increasing housing costs in the District, the Council is enacting the Home Purchase Assistance Amendment Act to the per-household maximum down payment assistance provided under HPAP from $40,000 to $50,000. To further assist homeless families, and very low income families at risk of becoming homeless, the Council added $3 million to the budget for the tenant-based Local Rent Supplement Program. The District currently lacks housing options that very low income individuals and families can afford. As a direct result, an increasing number of households either enter homelessness for the first time, or find themselves unable to emerge from homelessness with stable and affordable housing. To enhance the production of affordable housing units, the Council provided $1 million to create a locally funded Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (“LIHTC”). Currently, the federal government provides a similar tax credit that, over the past 20 years, has been extremely effective in creating affordable rental housing. The LIHTC provides funding for the development costs associated with building very low-income housing. Many states across the country also provide a state funded LIHTC to further accelerate the production of affordable housing for very low-income residents. To connect more residents with jobs, the Council funded a full-time Career Pathways Coordinator position within the Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development (“DMPED”). The Coordinator will support the Workforce Investment Council; develop a cross-agency plan for connecting basic skills programs to career pathways; set shared, city-wide priorities; and identify opportunities for alignment and collaboration between the District’s education, workforce, and human services providers. In addition, DMPED is receiving funding of $150,000 for Earned Income Tax Credit (“EITC”) education grants. The DC EITC is important tax relief, based on the federal EITC, which is designed specifically for low- and moderate-income workers. Residents who qualify for the EITC will pay less in taxes or even get cash back. The grant will be provided to community organizations that advise EITC-eligible residents in how to apply for the credit. The Council notes that the Mayor’s proposed FY 2015 budget eliminates the dedicated tax for the arts. Because of the importance of substantial public funding for the arts and humanities, the Council would like to direct $20 million for such funding. The Council is funding the Emerging Business District Demonstration Project Act of 2014, to establish a grant program within DMPED to promote business development. The grants will fund emerging business district demonstration projects and developing business improvement Districts for up to five years while a business tax base is further established in neighborhoods throughout the city. Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 21 of 32 The Council is investing in the District’s neighborhood retail corridors by adding an additional $777,000 to support and expand the Clean Team and Main Streets Programs under the Department of Small and Local Business Development (“DSLBD”). These programs ensure that our public spaces are clean, free of waste, and have an overall improved streetscape. This program also employs returning citizens, providing job opportunities for residents transitioning back to the District after a period of incarceration. The expansion of the grant funding in this budget comes with a corresponding expansion of the corridors to be covered, ensuring that more of the District enjoys the benefits of the programs. Finally, to provide greater transparency in how funds are being used for economic development, the Council is restructuring the operating budget for DMPED. The restructured budget is consistent with how the agency is organized by supervisor and program. Agency program and activity titles are also more descriptive. Government Direction and Support In the area of Government Direction and Support, a number of efficiencies were identified that allowed the Council to fund initiatives to improve services government-wide. These efforts include expanding and improving upon the government’s interactions with the public, investing in human capital by safeguarding public employees’ health and wellness, and improving the procurement appeals process. Savings from efficiencies identified at the Office of Risk Management were sufficient to allow the Council to direct $120,000 to the Office on Asian and Pacific Islander Affairs to restore lost domestic violence prevention funding. The Council added $208,000 to the Commission on Women to hire a communications assistant and policy analyst and expand its programmatic activities and outreach. In a similar vein, $195,000 is reallocated from savings at various agencies to fund the Commission on Fathers, Men, and Boys Establishment Act of 2014, comprising two staff members and associated equipment and support, to develop recommendations to address problems unique to male residents of the District. An increase of $59,000 will enable the Office of African Affairs to hire a translator to assist French speakers in accessing government services. Pursuant to an existing agreement with the Mayor, the Council is transferring administration of the District’s Emancipation Day activities, and the associated $250,000 in funding, to the Office of the Mayor. The Council is also establishing a new paper agency to consolidate the budget for the District’s Statehood Initiatives, at a funding level of $226,000. These funds will support the District’s outreach and lobbying efforts regarding legislative autonomy, budget autonomy, and the ultimate goal of full statehood for the District. In recognition of the need to attract and retain a dedicated and talented workforce, the Council is targeting funds for reinvestment in the District’s personnel. The Council is expanding the Government Family Leave Program Amendment Act of 2014 to provide District employees with up to eight weeks of paid maternity or paternity leave upon the birth or adoption Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 22 of 32 of a child. At the intersection of public and employee health, the Council is dedicating funds to implement the Smoking Restriction Amendment Act of 2013, which prohibits the use of tobacco products within 25 feet of recreation centers, swimming pools, parks, and various other facilities owned, controlled, or maintained by the District. In support of the District’s ongoing efforts to reform and improve its procurement system, the Council is adding $300,000 to the Contract Appeals Board to hire two new attorneys. The Board serves as the first level of appeal for businesses and organizations bidding on District solicitations. The new staff will help to ensure that the Board can issue its decisions quickly and clearly, benefiting both the District and its vendors, including certified business enterprises. Public Safety and Justice In the area of Public Safety and Justice, the proposed budget ensures that the District’s public safety agencies have the resources and tools necessary to fulfill their core mission and best serve District residents. The Council provides statutory authorization for the Metropolitan Police Department to receive reimbursement for police escort services needed to protect public safety, such as with the transportation of hazardous materials or oversized vehicles throughout the city. This ensures that police resources are not stretched by the need to absorb costs that should be borne by a private entity. In the agency’s enforcement of firearms regulations, the Council adopts a delay to the “microstamp-ready” requirement for semiautomatic pistols sold or otherwise transferred in the District. With the recent implementation of a similar requirement in California, the implementation delay in the Microstamping Implementation Amendment Act will allow MPD to incorporate best practices from that jurisdiction before implementing requirements here in the District. To ensure the District’s Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department remains competitive in the compensation of sworn personnel, the Council funds the pension impact of an arbitration award currently pending Council approval, permitting a collective bargaining agreement for sworn members to move forward. The Council also retains important statutory limitations on overtime earnings for this agency by including the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Overtime Limitation Amendment Act for the fifth consecutive year. The Council also identifies funding to pay for the negotiated compensation agreement for attorneys in the Office of the Attorney General, ensuring that the District remains competitive in the compensation provided to government lawyers. The Council also continues the District’s commitment to achieve National Association of Medical Examiners accreditation for the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner. Specifically, the Council provides for an increased salary to attract a highly qualified Deputy Medical Examiner that can assist with the daily operations of the agency, help with mass fatality preparations, and act in an alternate capacity to the Chief Medical Examiner. Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 23 of 32 In order to better aid those returning from incarceration to rejoin society, the Council establishes additional funding and personnel at the Office of Human Rights—which, among other functions, investigates and resolves employment discrimination complaints—to enable the implementation of the Fair Criminal Record Screening Act. That bill is currently being modified in Committee and is expected to be brought before the Council shortly. The Council also identifies funding that is directed to the Justice Grants Administration to provide transportation tokens for returning citizens as well as help returning citizens obtain birth certificates. The Council also advances a modification to the funding structure for the Access to Justice Initiative in order to allow more efficient administration of the two programs under the Initiative that are currently run by the District of Columbia Bar Foundation. More efficient operation of these programs ensures greater access to legal representation for the District’s lowincome residents and underserved communities. General Budget/Balancing Exercises While balanced in FY 2015, there is a sizable gap between revenues and expenditures in the out-years of the financial plan starting in FY 2016. This gap was caused by two main factors: (1) the use of $68.8 million in one-time resources to fund programs with an ongoing impact on the budget. And (2) a projected increase in the debt service of $93.9 million. The Mayor’s budget estimates that this $166 million gap represents approximately 8 percent of non-personal services expenses excluding those associated with Medicaid, schools, retirement, and debt service. In order to monitor the resolution of the potential imbalance in the financial plan, we are the passing the Financial Reporting Act of 2014. This subtitle mandates that the OCFO report to Council on a quarterly basis the progress made toward resolving the potential FY 2016 gap. The Mayor’s proposed budget identified funding to repeal the subject-to-funding provisions for several laws. In addition to that list, the Council is directing resources to fully implement a number of additional laws. This will allow for the execution of the alreadyapproved policies contained therein. The following legislation is fully funded in the Council’s budget: the Smoking Restriction Amendment Act of 2013; Traffic Adjudication Amendment Act of 2014; Wildlife Protection Act of 2010. The Council is also setting aside funds to fully implement three bills currently pending before the body: the Air Quality Amendment Act of 2014, the Wage Theft Prevention Amendment Act of 2014, and the Fair Criminal Record Screening Act of 2014 (popularly known as “Ban the Box” legislation). Finally, the Mayor’s proposed Revised Revenue Estimate Contingency Priority List is struck from the budget advanced by the Council. This list, since it is based on contingent revenue increases, gives an unrealistic expectation that an item on the list will be funded in the coming fiscal year. The Council believes the better avenue for expenditures of increased revenues is through the supplemental budget process, which is how the District has made such determinations for decades. Nevertheless, to meet unmet needs, the Council provides authority Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 24 of 32 to expend up to $50 million of additional FY 2015 revenues in the BRA. If additional revenues are recognized in the OCFO’s June 2014 Revenue Estimate, the Council will collectively determine the priorities that should be funded in a new subtitle at the second reading of the BSA. OPERATING BUDGET CHARTS The Council’s FY 2015 gross funds operating budget is $12,xxx,xxx,xxx, including local funds of $6,360,536,460. Funding for Human Support Services agencies are the District’s largest area of spending with a gross funds budget of $4,090,514,148, including local funds of $1,630,169,868. This represents an increase of $343.8 million or 8.9% over FY 2014. The growth in the Human Support Services program area from FY 2014 to FY 2015 is roughly indicative of the increase in the overall budget, which is $859.4 million or 7.2%. The following charts, compiled by the Office of the Budget Director to the Council, set forth the Mayor’s proposed operating and capital budgets and the Committee’s modifications thereto, which the Committee hereby recommends for adoption by the Council. DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 25 of 32 Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 CAPITAL BUDGET CHARTS The District’s proposed capital budget for FY 2015 through FY 2020 calls for financing $1.37 billion of capital expenditures in FY 2015. The capital program is financed primarily with bonds. It is proposed that $1.08 billion be borrowed to fund capital projects in FY 2015. District law limits debt service on District bonds to no more than 12% of General Fund expenditures. It is currently projected that by FY 2018, the District will reach its debt service limit and be forced to reduce its borrowing. As a result, the capital budget in FY 2018 is expected to be 45% less than the capital budget in FY 2015. The following chart, compiled by the Office of the Budget Director to the Council, sets forth the Committee’s modifications to the mayor’s proposed capital budget, which the Committee hereby recommends for adoption by the Council.   Council of the District of Columbia Modifications to the Mayor's Proposed FY 2015-2020 Capital Budget Request by Owner Agency, By Project As of May 27, 2014 Project No Owner Agency AB0 - COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WIL04C Project Title JOHN A. WILSON BUILDING FUND Impl Agency Scenario AB0 Mayor's Submission Fund Detail Existing Allotments 301 Council's Markup 0301 Total RG001C Total AB102C ARCHIVES AM0 Mayor's Submission 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -175,000.00 325,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 325,000.00 176,151.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -176,151.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,600,000.00 10,100,000.00 10,490,000.00 5,000,000.00 10,500,000.00 9,500,000.00 59,190,000.00 40,000,000.00 0300 0300 Total AB102C Total BA0 - OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Total PLN37C DISTRICT PUBLIC PLANS & STUDIES BD0 Mayor's Submission 0300 Council's Markup 0300 Total Mayor's Submission 301 Council's Markup 0301 Total PLN37C Total JM102C ZONING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS BJ0 BX0 18,000,000.00 14,400,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,325,000.00 1,925,000.00 18,000,000.00 14,400,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,325,000.00 1,925,000.00 18,000,000.00 14,400,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,325,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 175,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 175,000.00 0300 Total 175,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 175,000.00 175,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 175,000.00 175,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 175,000.00 -0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 301 0300 Total 2,440,850.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2,168,803.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 272,047.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 272,047.71 -0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.00 -0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00 9,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,000,000.00 Council's Markup 4,500,000.00 -3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500,000.00 0300 Total 4,500,000.00 6,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,500,000.00 BX0 - COMMISSION ON ARTS & HUMANITIES Total Mayor's Submission 0300 CAV37C Total CE0 -5,675,000.00 1,925,000.00 0.00 AH7GPC Total CLEVELAND PARK LIBRARY 0.00 0.00 0300 Council's Markup CPL38C 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 Mayor's Submission Mayor's Submission CE0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0300 Total CAV37C CAPITOL VIEW LIBRARY 0.00 14,400,000.00 0.00 Council's Markup CE0 - DC PUBLIC LIBRARY 0.00 -2,000,000.00 0.00 BJ0 - OFFICE OF ZONING Total AH7GPC ARTS & HUMANITIES GRANTS & PROJECTS 20,000,000.00 2,071,474.00 AB102C Total BX0 - COMMISSION ON ARTS & HUMANITIES 20,000,000.00 -18,075,000.00 -1,671,474.00 BD0 - OFFICE OF MUNICIPAL PLANNING Total BJ0 - OFFICE OF ZONING 6-yr Total -175,000.00 Council's Markup BD0 - OFFICE OF MUNICIPAL PLANNING FY 2020 0.00 AM0 - DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES Total BA0 - OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY FY 2019 0.00 AB0 - COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Total Mayor's Submission FY 2018 0.00 0300 Total AM0 FY 2017 0.00 WIL04C Total RG001C GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS FY 2016 0.00 Council's Markup AM0 - DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES FY 2015 500,000.00 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 4,500,000.00 6,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,500,000.00 2,625,000.00 12,595,000.00 450,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,670,000.00 Council's Markup 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0300 Total 5,625,000.00 12,595,000.00 450,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,670,000.00 5,625,000.00 12,595,000.00 450,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,670,000.00 CPL38C Total Page 1 of 10 Owner Agency Project No LB310C Project Title GENERAL IMPROVEMENT- LIBRARIES Impl Agency Scenario CE0 Mayor's Submission Fund Detail Existing Allotments MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. MEMORIAL CENTRAL CE0 PALISADES LIBRARY CE0 SOUTHEAST LIBRARY CE0 NEW COMMUNITIES EB0 STRAND THEATER EB0 2,000,000.00 -1,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 0300 Total 5,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE SE PROPERTIES EB0 5,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75,000,000.00 113,000,000.00 208,000,000.00 Council's Markup -5,500,000.00 0.00 4,500,000.00 0.00 1,500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 0300 Total 14,500,000.00 0.00 4,500,000.00 0.00 76,500,000.00 113,000,000.00 208,500,000.00 14,500,000.00 0.00 4,500,000.00 0.00 76,500,000.00 113,000,000.00 208,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,605,000.00 18,095,000.00 21,700,000.00 Council's Markup 6,700,000.00 15,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 -3,605,000.00 -18,095,000.00 0.00 0300 Total 6,700,000.00 15,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,700,000.00 6,700,000.00 15,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,700,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,500,000.00 12,500,000.00 25,000,000.00 Council's Markup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,500,000.00 0.00 -1,500,000.00 0300 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,000,000.00 12,500,000.00 23,500,000.00 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 13,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,000,000.00 0300 Total 36,000,000.00 500,000.00 20,000,000.00 0.00 13,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 79,500,000.00 36,000,000.00 500,000.00 20,000,000.00 0.00 13,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 79,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0300 Total 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 645,161.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -645,161.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61,800,000.00 39,400,000.00 35,000,000.00 0.00 13,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 159,200,000.00 1,009,000.00 1,000,000.00 900,000.00 1,030,098.00 3,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 16,939,098.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,695,000.00 -445,000.00 -1,250,000.00 0.00 1,009,000.00 1,000,000.00 900,000.00 2,725,098.00 2,555,000.00 8,750,000.00 16,939,098.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 301 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 0300 Total 1,000,000.00 900,000.00 2,725,098.00 2,555,000.00 8,750,000.00 16,939,098.00 11,003,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,882,500.00 -2,416,000.00 -5,214,000.00 614,000.00 4,016,000.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,463,250.00 5,789,250.00 614,000.00 4,016,000.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 16,882,500.00 3,463,250.00 5,789,250.00 614,000.00 4,016,000.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 16,882,500.00 11,506,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,885,500.00 -3,000,000.00 -3,405,000.00 0.00 6,405,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,379,250.00 8,101,250.00 0.00 6,405,000.00 0.00 0.00 19,885,500.00 5,379,250.00 8,101,250.00 0.00 6,405,000.00 0.00 0.00 19,885,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,813,000.00 22,813,000.00 45,626,000.00 Council's Markup 7,886,000.00 10,000,000.00 4,927,000.00 0.00 -22,813,000.00 0.00 0.00 0300 Total 7,886,000.00 10,000,000.00 4,927,000.00 0.00 0.00 22,813,000.00 45,626,000.00 7,886,000.00 10,000,000.00 4,927,000.00 0.00 0.00 22,813,000.00 45,626,000.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 Council's Markup 0300 Total GM121C Total AM0 1,009,000.00 5,879,250.00 8,379,250.00 GM120C Total JOHNSON MS RENOVATION/MODERNIZATION 80,500,000.00 0.00 Council's Markup JOH37C 23,500,000.00 324,415,000.00 0.00 GI010C Total AM0 12,500,000.00 125,500,000.00 20,000,000.00 0300 Total GM121C MAJOR REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE - DCPS 11,000,000.00 87,500,000.00 0.00 Council's Markup AM0 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 EB0 - DEPUTY MAYOR FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Total GM120C GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS REPAIRS - DCPS 0.00 7,425,000.00 -1,000,000.00 0300 Total AM0 0.00 60,820,000.00 37,000,000.00 0300 EB402C Total SPECIAL EDUCATION CLASSROOMS 0.00 43,170,000.00 Council's Markup Council's Markup GA0 - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS GI010C 4,500,000.00 20,000,000.00 Mayor's Submission New Total EB402C 6-yr Total Council's Markup EB008C Total New FY 2020 0.00 SEL37C Total EB008C FY 2019 0.00 CE0 - DC PUBLIC LIBRARY Total EB0 - DEPUTY MAYOR FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FY 2018 0.00 PAL37C Total SEL37C FY 2017 0.00 MCL03C Total PAL37C FY 2016 1,500,000.00 LB310C Total MCL03C FY 2015 3,000,000.00 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 JOH37C Total Page 2 of 10 Owner Agency Project No PL337C Project Title TRUESDELL ES MODERNIZATION/RENOVATION Impl Agency Scenario AM0 Mayor's Submission Fund Detail BANNEKER HS MODERNIZATION/RENOVATION AM0 SPINGARN CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION AM0 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,840,000.00 -6,840,000.00 0.00 0.00 0300 Total 0.00 0.00 649,000.00 6,840,000.00 0.00 0.00 7,489,000.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 LOGAN ES MODERNIZATION/RENOVATION AM0 BROWNE EC MODERNIZATION AM0 SHAW MS MODERNIZATION AM0 ORR ES MODERNIZATION/RENOVATION AM0 4,231,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47,172,000.00 0.00 0.00 67,074,000.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 ELIOT-HINE JHS RENOVATION/MODERNIZATION AM0 GARFIELD ES RENOVATION/MODERNIZATION AM0 2,157,000.00 17,745,000.00 47,172,000.00 0.00 0.00 67,074,000.00 30,479,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 62,000,000.00 -31,521,000.00 -30,479,000.00 0.00 0.00 58,400,000.00 0.00 -3,600,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58,400,000.00 0.00 58,400,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58,400,000.00 0.00 58,400,000.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 20,178,000.00 0.00 0.00 22,678,000.00 0.00 0.00 7,894,000.00 -7,894,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 7,894,000.00 12,284,000.00 0.00 0.00 22,678,000.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 7,894,000.00 12,284,000.00 0.00 0.00 22,678,000.00 1,400,000.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 12,938,000.00 0.00 16,838,000.00 1,600,000.00 9,438,000.00 0.00 0.00 -10,438,000.00 0.00 600,000.00 0300 Total 3,000,000.00 11,938,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 17,438,000.00 3,000,000.00 11,938,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 17,438,000.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,625,000.00 0.00 13,125,000.00 Council's Markup 2,500,000.00 -2,500,000.00 0.00 7,666,000.00 -7,666,000.00 0.00 0.00 0300 Total 2,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 7,666,000.00 2,959,000.00 0.00 13,125,000.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 2,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 7,666,000.00 2,959,000.00 0.00 13,125,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,636,000.00 0.00 23,636,000.00 Council's Markup 3,000,000.00 10,636,000.00 10,000,000.00 0.00 -23,636,000.00 0.00 0.00 0300 Total 3,000,000.00 10,636,000.00 10,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,636,000.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 3,000,000.00 10,636,000.00 10,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,636,000.00 0.00 12,500,000.00 18,367,000.00 18,311,000.00 0.00 0.00 49,178,000.00 Council's Markup 0.00 -12,500,000.00 -18,367,000.00 -14,943,000.00 27,499,000.00 18,311,000.00 0.00 0300 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,368,000.00 27,499,000.00 18,311,000.00 49,178,000.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,368,000.00 27,499,000.00 18,311,000.00 49,178,000.00 3,000,000.00 23,000,000.00 13,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39,000,000.00 0.00 3,476,000.00 -3,476,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 26,476,000.00 9,524,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 26,476,000.00 9,524,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39,000,000.00 0.00 28,803,000.00 19,202,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,005,000.00 Council's Markup 0.00 -9,601,000.00 9,601,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0300 Total 0.00 19,202,000.00 28,803,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,005,000.00 0.00 19,202,000.00 28,803,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,005,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,061,000.00 17,061,000.00 34,122,000.00 Council's Markup 0.00 12,500,000.00 21,622,000.00 0.00 -17,061,000.00 -17,061,000.00 0.00 0300 Total 0.00 12,500,000.00 21,622,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,122,000.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 0.00 12,500,000.00 21,622,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,122,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,516,000.00 0.00 0.00 12,516,000.00 Council's Markup 3,000,000.00 5,500,000.00 4,016,000.00 -12,516,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0300 Total 3,000,000.00 5,500,000.00 4,016,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,516,000.00 3,000,000.00 5,500,000.00 4,016,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,516,000.00 YY181C Total YY182C 0.00 31,521,000.00 Council's Markup YY177C Total YY181C 7,489,000.00 67,074,000.00 -4,231,000.00 YY170C Total AM0 0.00 0.00 17,745,000.00 0300 Total BANCROFT ES MODERNIZATION/RENOVATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup YY177C 6,840,000.00 42,941,000.00 2,157,000.00 YY120C Total YY170C 649,000.00 21,976,000.00 0.00 YY108C Total YY120C 0.00 2,157,000.00 0.00 YY107C Total YY108C 0.00 0.00 0300 Total YY105C Total YY107C 7,489,000.00 Council's Markup YY103C Total AM0 6-yr Total Council's Markup 0300 Total ANNE M. GODING ES FY 2020 0.00 Council's Markup YY105C FY 2019 6,840,000.00 YY102C Total AM0 FY 2018 0.00 0300 Total FRANCIS/STEVENS ES MODERNIZATION/RENOVAT FY 2017 649,000.00 Council's Markup YY103C FY 2016 0.00 YY101C Total YY102C FY 2015 0.00 0300 PL337C Total YY101C Existing Allotments Mayor's Submission 0300 YY182C Total Page 3 of 10 Owner Agency Project No YY185C Project Title KIMBALL ES MODERNIZATION/RENOVATION Impl Agency Scenario AM0 Mayor's Submission Fund Detail 0300 Existing Allotments FY 2015 FY 2016 0.00 FY 2017 0.00 Council's Markup 0300 Total 0.00 YY185C Total YY190C MURCH ES RENOVATION/MODERNIZATION AM0 Mayor's Submission 0300 Council's Markup AM0 AM0 WARD 7 APPLICATION SCHOOL AM0 AM0 AM0 HA0 IVY CITY COMMUNITY/RECREATION CENTER AM0 HEARST PARK AM0 0.00 0.00 17,696,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,357,774.00 3,500,000.00 10,138,774.00 21,551,000.00 12,168,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43,857,774.00 0.00 14,276,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,276,000.00 Council's Markup 14,276,000.00 -14,276,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0300 Total 14,276,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,276,000.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 14,276,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,276,000.00 0.00 2,900,000.00 32,600,000.00 8,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 44,000,000.00 Council's Markup 15,951,000.00 16,649,000.00 -24,100,000.00 -8,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0300 Total 15,951,000.00 19,549,000.00 8,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44,000,000.00 15,951,000.00 19,549,000.00 8,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 8,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,000,000.00 0300 Total 8,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,000,000.00 8,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,000,000.00 426,962,274.00 335,902,500.00 250,166,000.00 107,820,098.00 260,611,000.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 211,164,000.00 1,592,625,872.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 Council's Markup 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0300 Total 1,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 850,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 850,000.00 2,850,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,850,000.00 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 2,850,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,850,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,400,000.00 0.00 14,400,000.00 Council's Markup 14,400,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -14,400,000.00 0.00 0.00 0300 Total 14,400,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,400,000.00 14,400,000.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 14,400,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 0300 Total 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 0300 Total 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 1,925,000.00 7,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,925,000.00 0300 Total 1,925,000.00 7,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,925,000.00 1,925,000.00 7,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,925,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 0.00 2,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,000,000.00 0300 Total 0.00 2,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,000,000.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 New Total New 8,500,000.00 43,857,774.00 QN751C Total New 9,196,000.00 12,168,000.00 0.00 QN751C Total URA37CC URBAN AGRICULTURE 0.00 21,551,000.00 0.00 WBRCTC Total AM0 0.00 6,638,774.00 0.00 QN702C Total QN751C FRANKLIN SQUARE PARK 0.00 0.00 0300 Total AM0 17,696,000.00 0.00 Council's Markup WBRCTC EDGEWOOD REC CENTER 0.00 0.00 Q11HRC Total QN702C ATHLETIC FIELD AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 0.00 GA0 - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Total Q11HRC HILLCREST RECREATION CENTER 8,500,000.00 12,168,000.00 New Total HA0 - DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION 9,196,000.00 17,696,000.00 0.00 YY1MRC Total New 8,500,000.00 6-yr Total 0.00 21,551,000.00 YY197C Total YY1MRC MARIE REED ES MODERNIZATION/RENOVATION -8,500,000.00 FY 2020 0.00 3,500,000.00 YY190C Total WATKINS ES MODERNIZATION/RENOVATIONS FY 2019 0.00 10,138,774.00 0300 Total YY197C 0.00 FY 2018 17,696,000.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 New Total Page 4 of 10 Owner Agency Project No New Project Title WARD 3 OUTDOOR POOL Impl Agency Scenario AM0 Mayor's Submission Fund Detail THERAPUTIC RECREATION CENTER AM0 HARDY RECREATION CENTER AM0 CHEVY CHASE RECREATION CENTER AM0 SQUARE 238 RECREATION PLANNING AM0 FORT DAVIS RECREATION CENTER AM0 0.00 1,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 0300 Total 1,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 1,500,000.00 6,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,000,000.00 0300 Total 1,500,000.00 6,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 6,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 0300 Total 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 0.00 0.00 3,500,000.00 4,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 8,000,000.00 0300 Total 0.00 0.00 3,500,000.00 4,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 8,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,500,000.00 4,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 8,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 0300 Total 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0300 Total 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 66,880,380.00 57,815,000.00 40,350,000.00 10,500,000.00 32,100,000.00 11,500,000.00 219,145,380.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 Mayor's Submission 0300 Council's Markup 0300 Total Mayor's Submission 0301 Council's Markup 0301 Total UMC01C Total HT0 - DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE FINANCE Total KA0 - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 6EQ05C PARKING METERS KA0 Mayor's Submission 0300 Council's Markup 0300 Total 6EQ05C Total AD306C PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS KA0 6-yr Total Council's Markup HA0 - DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Total HT0 FY 2020 0.00 New Total HT0 - DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE FINANCE UMC01C EAST END MEDICAL CENTER FY 2019 0.00 New Total New FY 2018 0.00 New Total New FY 2017 0.00 New Total New FY 2016 0.00 New Total New FY 2015 0.00 0300 New Total New Existing Allotments Mayor's Submission 0300 Council's Markup 0300 Total Mayor's Submission 0301 Council's Markup 0301 Total Mayor's Submission 0330 35,876,000.00 90,000,000.00 90,000,000.00 0.00 120,000,000.00 0.00 335,876,000.00 -20,750,000.00 -51,400,000.00 -29,300,000.00 0.00 -104,000,000.00 0.00 -205,450,000.00 15,126,000.00 38,600,000.00 60,700,000.00 0.00 16,000,000.00 0.00 130,426,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,574,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,574,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,574,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,574,000.00 15,126,000.00 38,600,000.00 60,700,000.00 4,574,000.00 16,000,000.00 0.00 135,000,000.00 20,921,040.00 41,550,000.00 60,700,000.00 4,574,000.00 16,000,000.00 0.00 143,745,040.00 5,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 -5,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -5,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 592,000.00 575,000.00 1,350,000.00 0.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 5,517,000.00 908,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 908,000.00 1,500,000.00 575,000.00 1,350,000.00 0.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 6,425,000.00 908,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 908,000.00 -908,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -908,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 925,381.00 150,213.00 160,288.00 149,555.00 149,555.00 1,534,992.00 Council's Markup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0330 Total 0.00 925,381.00 150,213.00 160,288.00 149,555.00 149,555.00 1,534,992.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,381.00 1,500,213.00 160,288.00 1,649,555.00 1,649,555.00 7,959,992.00 AD306C Total Page 5 of 10 Owner Agency Project No Project Title AW031C S CAPITOL ST/FREDERICK DOUGLASS BRIDGE Impl Agency Scenario KA0 Mayor's Submission Fund Detail 0300 Council's Markup 0300 Total Mayor's Submission BRIDGE MAINTENANCE KA0 0.00 -69,575,000.00 24,363,000.00 0.00 114,515,000.00 291,290,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0310 Total 0.00 67,770,000.00 117,290,000.00 106,230,000.00 0.00 0.00 291,290,000.00 51,438,000.00 102,190,000.00 121,584,000.00 106,230,000.00 24,363,000.00 0.00 405,805,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,080,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,080,000.00 1,080,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,080,000.00 1,080,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,080,000.00 -1,080,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,080,000.00 Mayor's Submission 300 0301 0330 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,080,000.00 1,055,000.00 1,080,000.00 1,080,000.00 1,080,000.00 5,375,000.00 Council's Markup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0330 Total 0.00 1,080,000.00 1,055,000.00 1,080,000.00 1,080,000.00 1,080,000.00 5,375,000.00 1,080,000.00 1,080,000.00 1,055,000.00 1,080,000.00 1,080,000.00 1,080,000.00 6,455,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,762,553.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,762,553.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 0301 Council's Markup 0301 Total Mayor's Submission 0330 Council's Markup 0330 Total CE310C Total Mayor's Submission 1,762,553.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,762,553.00 1,762,553.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,762,553.00 -1,762,553.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,762,553.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,674,371.00 5,017,924.00 2,777,000.00 9,403,000.00 6,206,000.00 6,206,000.00 32,284,295.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,674,371.00 4,436,924.00 5,017,924.00 5,017,924.00 2,777,000.00 2,777,000.00 9,403,000.00 9,403,000.00 6,206,000.00 6,206,000.00 6,206,000.00 6,206,000.00 32,284,295.00 34,046,848.00 17,825,800.00 1,908,600.00 11,908,600.00 2,008,600.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 Council's Markup 10,000,000.00 -10,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0300 Total 11,908,600.00 1,908,600.00 2,008,600.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 17,825,800.00 11,908,600.00 1,908,600.00 2,008,600.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 17,825,800.00 8,317,354.00 5,817,354.00 364,602.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,499,310.00 297,037.46 8,614,391.46 0.00 5,817,354.00 0.00 364,602.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 297,037.46 14,796,347.46 700,000.00 700,000.00 700,000.00 700,000.00 700,000.00 700,000.00 4,200,000.00 -297,037.46 402,962.54 0.00 700,000.00 0.00 700,000.00 0.00 700,000.00 0.00 700,000.00 0.00 700,000.00 -297,037.46 3,902,962.54 0300 CEL21C Total Mayor's Submission 0300 Council's Markup 0300 Total Mayor's Submission 0301 Council's Markup 0301 Total 0.00 2,500,000.00 4,202,752.00 2,194,000.00 0.00 0.00 8,896,752.00 Council's Markup 0.00 0330 Total 0.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 4,202,752.00 0.00 2,194,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,896,752.00 27,596,062.00 Mayor's Submission 0330 CG313C Total KA0 5,653,000.00 0.00 0.00 Mayor's Submission CIRCULATOR BUSES 0.00 0.00 0300 Total CIR14C 4,294,000.00 0.00 Council's Markup KA0 -18,056,000.00 34,420,000.00 184,090,000.00 106,230,000.00 CE307C Total CG313C GREENSPACE MANAGEMENT -30,330,000.00 51,438,000.00 6-yr Total 0.00 0.00 Mayor's Submission KA0 -26,842,000.00 FY 2020 18,710,000.00 117,290,000.00 0301 Total ALLEY REHABILITATION FY 2019 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup CEL21C FY 2018 22,350,000.00 67,770,000.00 Mayor's Submission KA0 FY 2017 64,750,000.00 0.00 0300 Total ALLEY MAINTENANCE FY 2016 78,280,000.00 0.00 0310 Council's Markup CE310C FY 2015 Council's Markup AW031C Total CE307C Existing Allotments Mayor's Submission 0300 Council's Markup 0300 Total Mayor's Submission 0301 Council's Markup 0301 Total CIR14C Total Page 6 of 10 9,017,354.00 9,017,354.00 5,267,354.00 2,894,000.00 700,000.00 700,000.00 7,702,500.00 12,112,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,815,000.00 0.00 4,900,000.00 17,600,000.00 0.00 7,100,000.00 0.00 29,600,000.00 7,702,500.00 17,012,500.00 17,600,000.00 0.00 7,100,000.00 0.00 49,415,000.00 0.00 4,900,000.00 17,600,000.00 7,100,000.00 0.00 0.00 29,600,000.00 0.00 -4,900,000.00 -17,600,000.00 -7,100,000.00 0.00 0.00 -29,600,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,702,500.00 17,012,500.00 17,600,000.00 0.00 7,100,000.00 0.00 49,415,000.00 Owner Agency Project No Project Title CIRBGC DBOM CIRCULATOR BUS GARAGE Impl Agency Scenario KA0 Mayor's Submission Fund Detail 0300 Council's Markup 0300 Total KA0 26,098,000.00 28,154,000.00 Council's Markup 0.00 0.00 0.00 -13,049,000.00 -13,049,000.00 -13,049,000.00 -39,147,000.00 0301 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,056,000.00 0.00 0.00 13,049,000.00 13,049,000.00 28,154,000.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,429,000.00 3,429,000.00 6,858,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,429,000.00 3,429,000.00 6,858,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,429,000.00 3,429,000.00 6,858,000.00 Council's Markup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -3,429,000.00 -3,429,000.00 -6,858,000.00 0300 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 417,744.00 417,744.00 1,835,488.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 417,744.00 417,744.00 1,835,488.00 0301 0330 Mayor's Submission 0300 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,846,744.00 3,846,744.00 8,693,488.00 3,250,000.00 3,311,248.00 250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,811,248.00 Council's Markup 1,231,447.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,231,447.00 0300 Total 4,481,447.00 3,311,248.00 250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,042,695.00 0301 0330 Council's Markup 0330 Total NP000C Total Mayor's Submission 300 Council's Markup 0300 Total Mayor's Submission 0301 Council's Markup 0301 Total 1,231,447.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,231,447.00 -1,231,447.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,231,447.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,518,553.00 2,688,752.00 3,750,000.00 1,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 9,457,305.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,518,553.00 2,688,752.00 3,750,000.00 1,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 9,457,305.00 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 17,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,636,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,636,000.00 4,636,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,636,000.00 4,636,000.00 5,474,000.00 5,474,000.00 5,474,000.00 5,474,000.00 5,474,000.00 32,006,000.00 -4,636,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -4,636,000.00 0.00 5,474,000.00 5,474,000.00 5,474,000.00 5,474,000.00 5,474,000.00 27,370,000.00 32,006,000.00 4,636,000.00 5,474,000.00 5,474,000.00 5,474,000.00 5,474,000.00 5,474,000.00 70,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 70,000,000.00 -21,800,000.00 66,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 92,774,000.00 1,617,000.00 139,091,000.00 48,200,000.00 66,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 92,774,000.00 1,617,000.00 209,091,000.00 0.00 46,500,000.00 89,611,260.00 141,421,500.00 201,954,111.00 260,578,431.00 740,065,302.00 Council's Markup 0.00 -46,500,000.00 -34,470,289.00 -81,812,843.44 -125,544,806.12 -147,931,605.41 -436,259,543.97 0301 Total 0.00 0.00 55,140,971.00 59,608,656.56 76,409,304.88 112,646,825.59 303,805,758.03 48,200,000.00 66,500,000.00 55,140,971.00 59,608,656.56 169,183,304.88 114,263,825.59 512,896,758.03 1,726,391.10 PLU00C Total Mayor's Submission 0300 Council's Markup 0300 Total Mayor's Submission 0301 SA306C Total KA0 13,049,000.00 39,147,000.00 Mayor's Submission LOCAL STREETS WARD 1 13,049,000.00 13,049,000.00 0301 Total SR301C 0.00 13,049,000.00 Council's Markup KA0 0.00 13,049,000.00 Mayor's Submission H ST/ BENNING/ K ST LINE 2,056,000.00 13,049,000.00 CIRFLC Total SA306C 2,056,000.00 -2,056,000.00 0.00 0301 Total KA0 6-yr Total 0.00 13,049,000.00 Council's Markup POWER LINE UNDERGROUNDING FY 2020 0.00 0.00 Mayor's Submission PLU00C FY 2019 0.00 0.00 Mayor's Submission KA0 FY 2018 0.00 0.00 0300 Total NON-PARTICIPATING HIGHWAY TRUST FUND SUP FY 2017 0.00 2,056,000.00 Council's Markup NP000C FY 2016 2,056,000.00 0.00 0301 CIRBGC Total CIRCULATOR FLEET REHAB FY 2015 0.00 Mayor's Submission CIRFLC Existing Allotments Mayor's Submission 432,855.25 461,767.85 251,768.00 0.00 290,000.00 290,000.00 Council's Markup 388,636.50 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 390,636.50 0300 Total 821,491.75 461,767.85 253,768.00 0.00 290,000.00 290,000.00 2,117,027.60 178,508.25 91,780.00 278,575.00 541,238.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,364,290.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 68,512.00 0.00 0.00 68,512.00 178,508.25 91,780.00 278,575.00 609,750.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,432,802.25 1,000,000.00 553,547.85 532,343.00 609,750.00 1,440,407.00 1,413,782.00 5,549,829.85 Mayor's Submission 0300 0330 Council's Markup 0330 Total SR301C Total Page 7 of 10 Owner Agency Project No SR302C Project Title LOCAL STREETS WARD 2 Impl Agency Scenario KA0 Mayor's Submission Fund Detail 388,337.01 0.00 -8,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 380,337.01 0300 Total 821,192.01 461,768.00 243,768.00 0.00 290,000.00 290,000.00 2,106,728.01 178,807.99 91,780.00 288,575.00 541,238.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,374,589.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 68,512.00 0.00 0.00 68,512.00 178,807.99 91,780.00 288,575.00 609,750.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,443,101.99 0330 Mayor's Submission 0300 0.00 0.00 0.00 390,336.25 290,000.00 290,000.00 2,116,728.00 178,808.25 91,780.00 278,575.00 541,238.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,364,590.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 68,512.00 0.00 0.00 68,512.00 178,808.25 91,780.00 278,575.00 609,750.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,433,102.25 Mayor's Submission 0330 0300 553,548.25 532,343.00 609,750.00 1,440,407.00 1,413,782.00 5,549,830.25 432,855.00 461,768.25 251,768.00 0.00 290,000.00 290,000.00 1,726,391.25 388,336.75 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 390,336.75 0300 Total 821,191.75 461,768.25 253,768.00 0.00 290,000.00 290,000.00 2,116,728.00 178,808.25 91,780.00 278,575.00 541,238.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,364,590.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 68,512.00 0.00 0.00 68,512.00 178,808.25 91,780.00 278,575.00 609,750.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,433,102.25 0330 Mayor's Submission 0300 1,000,000.00 553,548.25 532,343.00 609,750.00 1,440,407.00 1,413,782.00 5,549,830.25 432,855.25 461,768.55 251,768.00 0.00 290,000.00 290,000.00 1,726,391.80 Council's Markup 388,336.50 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 390,336.50 0300 Total 821,191.75 461,768.55 253,768.00 0.00 290,000.00 290,000.00 2,116,728.30 178,808.25 91,780.00 278,575.00 678,262.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,501,614.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 -68,512.00 0.00 0.00 -68,512.00 178,808.25 91,780.00 278,575.00 609,750.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,433,102.25 0330 Mayor's Submission 0300 1,000,000.00 553,548.55 532,343.00 609,750.00 1,440,407.00 1,413,782.00 5,549,830.55 432,885.00 461,768.00 251,768.00 0.00 290,000.00 290,000.00 1,726,421.00 Council's Markup 388,306.75 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 390,306.75 0300 Total 821,191.75 461,768.00 253,768.00 0.00 290,000.00 290,000.00 2,116,727.75 178,808.25 91,780.00 278,575.00 678,262.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,501,614.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 -68,512.00 0.00 0.00 -68,512.00 178,808.25 91,780.00 278,575.00 609,750.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,433,102.25 0330 Council's Markup 0330 Total SR306C Total Mayor's Submission 0300 1,000,000.00 553,548.00 532,343.00 609,750.00 1,440,407.00 1,413,782.00 5,549,830.00 432,855.25 461,768.25 251,768.00 0.00 290,000.00 290,000.00 1,726,391.50 Council's Markup 388,336.50 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 390,336.50 0300 Total 821,191.75 461,768.25 253,768.00 0.00 290,000.00 290,000.00 2,116,728.00 178,808.25 91,780.00 278,575.00 678,262.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,501,614.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 -68,512.00 0.00 0.00 -68,512.00 178,808.25 91,780.00 278,575.00 609,750.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,433,102.25 Mayor's Submission 0330 Council's Markup 0330 Total SR307C Total KA0 1,000,000.00 Council's Markup Mayor's Submission LOCAL STREETS WARD 8 1,726,391.75 0.00 SR305C Total SR308C 5,549,830.00 290,000.00 2,000.00 0330 Total KA0 1,413,782.00 290,000.00 253,768.00 Council's Markup LOCAL STREETS WARD 7 1,440,407.00 0.00 0.00 Mayor's Submission SR307C 609,750.00 251,768.00 461,768.25 SR304C Total KA0 532,343.00 461,768.25 821,191.75 0330 Total LOCAL STREETS WARD 6 553,548.00 432,855.50 388,336.25 Council's Markup SR306C 1,000,000.00 0300 Total Mayor's Submission KA0 1,726,391.00 Council's Markup SR303C Total LOCAL STREETS WARD 5 6-yr Total Council's Markup 0330 Total SR305C FY 2020 290,000.00 Council's Markup KA0 FY 2019 290,000.00 Mayor's Submission LOCAL STREETS WARD 4 FY 2018 0.00 SR302C Total SR304C FY 2017 251,768.00 0330 Total KA0 FY 2016 461,768.00 0300 Council's Markup LOCAL STREETS WARD 3 FY 2015 432,855.00 Mayor's Submission SR303C Existing Allotments Mayor's Submission 0300 1,000,000.00 553,548.25 532,343.00 609,750.00 1,440,407.00 1,413,782.00 5,549,830.25 432,855.47 461,768.25 251,768.00 0.00 290,000.00 290,000.00 1,726,391.72 Council's Markup 388,336.28 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 390,336.28 0300 Total 821,191.75 461,768.25 253,768.00 0.00 290,000.00 290,000.00 2,116,728.00 178,808.25 91,780.00 278,575.00 678,262.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,501,614.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 -68,512.00 0.00 0.00 -68,512.00 178,808.25 91,780.00 278,575.00 609,750.00 1,150,407.00 1,123,782.00 3,433,102.25 1,000,000.00 553,548.25 532,343.00 609,750.00 1,440,407.00 1,413,782.00 5,549,830.25 Mayor's Submission 0330 Council's Markup 0330 Total SR308C Total Page 8 of 10 Owner Agency Project No TRF01C Project Title TRAFFIC OPERATIONS CENTER Impl Agency Scenario KA0 Mayor's Submission Fund Detail 20,000,000.00 -8,000,000.00 -10,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -18,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 6,250,000.00 6,250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 6,250,000.00 6,250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 1,100,000.00 6,250,000.00 6,250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,600,000.00 0306 Total 1,100,000.00 6,250,000.00 6,250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,600,000.00 3,100,000.00 12,500,000.00 12,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300,000.00 0300 Total 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0300 Total 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 1,300,000.00 1,300,000.00 2,600,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,200,000.00 0300 Total 1,300,000.00 1,300,000.00 2,600,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,200,000.00 1,300,000.00 1,300,000.00 2,600,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,200,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250,000.00 0300 Total 250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mayor's Submission 0300 306 Mayor's Submission 0300 New Total IVY CITY STREETSCAPES KA0 Mayor's Submission 0300 New Total New WARD 8 STREETSCAPES KA0 Mayor's Submission 0300 New Total New PUERTO RICO AVENUE NOISE AND VIBRATION BARRIER WAL KA0 Mayor's Submission 0300 New Total New DUPONT CROWN PARK INFRASTRUCTURE KA0 Mayor's Submission 0300 Council's Markup 0300 Total Mayor's Submission 0301 Council's Markup 0301 Total New Total KA0 - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Total KE0 - MASS TRANSIT SUBSIDIES SA501C WMATA CIP CONTRIBUTION KE0 Mayor's Submission 0300 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000,000.00 433,154,570.00 476,214,650.40 462,372,201.00 404,252,995.96 463,261,262.88 65,526,000.00 56,062,000.00 67,734,000.00 67,734,000.00 66,701,000.00 66,701,000.00 390,458,000.00 66,701,000.00 66,701,000.00 390,458,000.00 Council's Markup Mayor's Submission 65,526,000.00 0301 Council's Markup 0301 Total TO0 67,734,000.00 67,734,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56,062,000.00 67,734,000.00 67,734,000.00 66,701,000.00 66,701,000.00 390,458,000.00 141,625,000.00 107,161,000.00 118,833,000.00 118,833,000.00 117,400,000.00 117,400,000.00 721,252,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Council's Markup 1,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500,000.00 0300 Total 1,500,000.00 KE0 - MASS TRANSIT SUBSIDIES Total INSPECTIONS, COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT DATABASE 56,062,000.00 65,526,000.00 SA501C Total New 375,728,512.59 2,614,984,192.83 0.00 0300 Total KG0 - DISTRICT DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 6-yr Total 0.00 New Total New FY 2020 0.00 Mayor's Submission KA0 FY 2019 0.00 0300 Total EASTERN MARKET PLAZA & FRENCH STREET STREETSCAPE FY 2018 0.00 Council's Markup New FY 2017 10,000,000.00 0300 Total KA0 FY 2016 8,000,000.00 TRF01C Total 11TH STREET BRIDGE PARK FY 2015 2,000,000.00 0300 Council's Markup New Existing Allotments Mayor's Submission 0300 1,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 New Total 1,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500,000.00 KG0 - DISTRICT DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Total 11,750,000.00 15,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 0.00 4,500,000.00 9,500,000.00 50,750,000.00 Page 9 of 10 Owner Agency KT0 - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Project No Project Title CON01C CONSOLIDATION OF DPW FACILITIES @1833 W. Impl Agency Scenario KT0 Mayor's Submission Fund Detail Existing Allotments 0300 Council's Markup 0300 Total CON01C Total KT0 - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Total RM0 - DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH HX403C HOUSING INITIATIVES - DBH RM0 Mayor's Submission 301 Council's Markup 301 Mayor's Submission 0330 Council's Markup 0330 Total HX403C Total RM0 - DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH Total Modified Budget Total Page 10 of 10 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 75,000,000.00 6-yr Total 3,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75,000,000.00 153,500,000.00 -3,500,000.00 0.00 3,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,500,000.00 0.00 75,000,000.00 75,000,000.00 153,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,500,000.00 0.00 75,000,000.00 75,000,000.00 153,500,000.00 4,500,000.00 0.00 3,500,000.00 0.00 75,000,000.00 75,792,000.00 158,792,000.00 3,610,275.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -3,610,275.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,716,903.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -5,716,903.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,366,440,570.00 1,227,688,308.40 1,039,236,201.00 663,980,093.96 1,174,182,262.88 1,036,834,512.59 6,508,361,948.83 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 26 of 32 Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 II. LEGISLATIVE CHRONOLOGY  April 3, 2014 Chairman Mendelson introduces Bill 20-749 on behalf of the Mayor April 7, 2014 Committee of the Whole holds a public briefing on Bill 20-749, Bill 20-750, and the Mayor’s Fiscal Year 2015 Proposed Budget and Financial Plan April 11, 2014 Notice of public hearings on Bill 20-749 is published in the District of Columbia Register April 11, 2014 Notice of Intent to Act on Bill 20-749 is published in the District of Columbia Register April 9 - May 9, 2014 Committees hold public hearings on the budgets of the agencies under their purview and the subtitles of the Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Support Act of 2014 that were referred to them for comments May 9, 2014 Committee of the Whole holds a public hearing on Bill 20-749 and Bill 20-750 May 14-15, 2014 Committees mark up and approve their budget recommendations for Fiscal Year 2014 May 28, 2014 Committee of the Whole marks up Bill 20-749 III. POSITION OF THE EXECUTIVE  Bill 20-749 represents the Mayor’s Fiscal Year 2015 Proposed Budget and Financial Plan. On May 8, 2014, the Mayor transmitted an errata letter requesting that the Council incorporate various changes to the introduced version of Bill 20-198 and budget documents. The errata letter is included in the attachments to this report. At the May 9, 2014 hearing on Bill 20-749, Eric Goulet, Deputy Chief of Staff and Director of the Mayor’s Office of Budget and Finance, presented testimony on behalf of the Mayor. Mr. Goulet’s written testimony is attached to this report. DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 27 of 32 Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 IV. COMMENTS OF ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMISSIONS  The Committee received no testimony or comments from any Advisory Neighborhood Commission on Bill 20-749. V. LIST OF WITNESSES  The Committee of the Whole held a public hearing on B20-749 on May 13, 2013. The witness list was as follows: 1. 2. Nancy Shia Bruce McKaig 3. Cosby Hunt 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Mary Levy Jenny Reed David Bardin Katalin Peter Jean-Michel Giraud Sally Craig Alan Banks Bryan Kurtz Harry Wingo Nechama Masliansky Lisa Mallory Sean Cahill Lashell Rivers Scott Schenkelberg Kurt Runge Bob Bremner 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. David Schwartzman Ed Wood Robert Warren Nassim Moshiree Kate Coventry Dan Wedderburn Nicola Whiteman 27. Jackie Duke Program Director, Mentoring Works II Representative, This Neighborhood Has a Face: Talking Pictures Manager of Teaching & Learning, Center for Inspired Teaching Public Witness Policy Director, DC Fiscal Policy Institute Public Witness DC Association of Realtors Executive Director, Friendship Place Co-President of the Board, Friendship Place Peer, Friendship Place Volunteer, Friendship Place President/CEO, DC Chamber of Commerce Senior Advocacy Advisor, So Others Might Eat, Inc. CEO, DC Building Industry Association President, DC Building Industry Association Public Witness President, Miriam’s Kitchen Advocacy Director, Miriam’s Kitchen Incoming Board Chair, Humanities Council of Washington, DC DC Statehood Green Party DC Association of Realtors Director, People for Fairness Coalition Staff Attorney, Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless DC Fiscal Policy Institute DC for Democracy Vice President of Government Affairs, Apartment and Office Building Association Vice President of Operations, Greater DC Region, Brookfield Office Properties DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 28 of 32 Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 28. Shari Rosenburg 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. Joe Kessler Brian Adams Michael Weincek Ben Roberts Samantha Waxman Juanita McKenzie Louis Perwien Monica Kamen Tiffani Ross 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. Jesse Lovell Bobby Cavallero Julia Senerchia Jonah Davenport Sapiya Euing Boyd Renee Wadsworth Libby Hill Robert Pohlman 46. 47. 48. 49. Ericka Taylor Miriam Savad Michael Sindram Eric Goulet VI. Director for Property Management and Administration, Boston Properties Apartment and Office Building Association Public Witness President, Weincek +Associates, Architects +Planners Pastor, Foundry United Methodist Church Public Witness, Ward 1 Resident 930, 940, 960 Randolph Street Tenants Association Public Witness Community Organizer, Jews United for Justice Director of Community Outreach and Training, Life Pieces To Masterpieces Public Witness Public Witness Public Witness Public Witness Public Witness Senior Manager – State Affairs, Auto Alliance Program Trainer, Global Kids Executive Director, Coalition for Nonprofit Housing and Economic Development Executive Director, DC Fair Budget Coalition Public Witness DC Justice for All Deputy Chief of Staff and Budget Director, Office of the Mayor IMPACT ON EXISTING LAW  Bill 20-749 represents the District’s budget request for Fiscal Year 2015, pursuant to section 446 of the Home Rule Act, and does not amend existing District law. As set forth in the Home Rule Act, Bill 20-749 is effective only insofar as it is adopted by Congress.7 7 It is the position of the Council that Law 19-321, the Budget Autonomy Act of 2012, was a valid exercise of the District’s authority to amend the District Charter pursuant to the provisions of the Home Rule Act. However, the Council is bound by the May 19, 2014 memorandum opinion and order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in Council v. Gray. In that order, the court enjoined the Council from implementing Law 19-321. The Council will treat the Mayor’s budget request as in past years, pursuant to Judge Sullivan’s ruling. The Council recommends that Congress expressly ratify the District's action – approved overwhelmingly by District voters – and confirm the District's authority to spend locally raised and locally kept funds. The Council notes that budget autonomy for the District enjoys broad bipartisan support and ratification of the Local Budget Autonomy Act would grant budget autonomy and preserve Congress's prerogatives. DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 29 of 32 Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 VII. FISCAL IMPACT  Bill 20-749 comprises the Council’s adoption of the annual budget for the District government and establishes the availability of funding for the continuing operations of the District for Fiscal Year 2015. The bill also sets forth certain authorization requests in Division B which would not go into effect unless enacted by Congress. VIII. SECTION‐BY‐SECTION ANALYSIS    DIVISION A - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPROPRIATION REQUEST Section 1 States the short title of Bill 20-749. Section 2 Sets forth the expenditure levels and appropriation language for the government of the District for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015.8 Section 101 Would appropriate such sums as may be necessary to make refunds and pay legal settlements or judgments that have been entered against the District. Section 102 Would authorize the District to use local funds to conduct lobbying activities. Section 103 Would authorize the District to approve reprogrammings of local funds through November 7, 2015. Section 104 Would prohibit the use of appropriated funds to provide District officers and employees with official vehicles, with certain exceptions. Section 105 Sets forth authority and restrictions for the transfer of funds between the operating and capital budgets. Section 106 Would authorize the District, for fiscal year 2016 and each succeeding fiscal year, to spend local dollars as set forth in that year’s budget request act during a lapse in regular appropriations.9 Section 107 Would authorize the Attorney General to enter into contingency-fee contracts; would provide that in such circumstances, the costs, expenses, and fees need not be included in appropriated amounts. 8 In some cases, such as the budget for capital projects, spending authority is established for periods extending beyond FY 2015. 9 Congress has already provided similar authority for FY 2014 and FY 2015. Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 30 of 32 Section 108 Provides that the District shall not be required to include a moveable span in the replacement of the Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge unless the federal government provides the funding for the moveable span. Section 109 Provides a technical clarification, defining the term “this Act” for purposes of Title IV of the Budget Request Act. DIVISION B - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AUTHORIZATION REQUEST: BUDGET AND LEGISLATIVE AUTONOMY Section 201 Would amend section 446 of the Home Rule Act to provide partial budget autonomy for the District. Section 202 Would amend the Home Rule Act to provide budget and fiscal year autonomy for the District. Section 203 Would provide for increased legislative autonomy for the District by repealing certain provisions of the Home Rule Act related to Congressional action. DIVISION C - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AUTHORIZATION REQUEST OMNIBUS PROVISIONS Section 301 Would enact into law D.C. Act 17-278, the Contingency Cash Reserve Transparency Amendment Act of 2008. Section 302 Would provide for the congressional approval of the recent referendum, overwhelmingly approved by voters, to amend the District’s Home Rule Charter to provide for local budget autonomy. A similar provision was included in the Mayor’s budget proposal, and in the proposed budget submitted by the President of the United States. The Council recommends that Congress expressly ratify the District's action – approved overwhelmingly by District voters – and confirm the District's authority to spend locally raised and locally kept funds. The Council notes that budget autonomy for the District enjoys broad bipartisan support, and ratification of the Local Budget Autonomy Act would grant budget autonomy and preserve Congress's prerogatives. Section 303 Would repeal the triggers for reactivation of the District of Columbia Financial Responsibility and Management Assistance Authority. Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 31 of 32 Section 304 Would authorize the Attorney General to enter into contingency-fee contracts; would provide that in such circumstances, the costs, expenses, and fees need not be included in appropriated amounts. Section 305 Would streamline the process for congressional review of District legislation, allowing for District acts to take effect after 30 calendar days of congressional review (in place of the 30-session-day review period currently set forth in the Home Rule Act). Section 306 Would require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to amend the deed whereby certain property was transferred to the District to eliminate all conditions or restrictions on use of the property. Section 307 Would clarify the obligations of the District related to urban renewal programs that are no longer active; would terminate certain urban renewal plans for the District; would authorize the District to use funds received under urban renewal plans for any purpose; would authorize the District to dispose of lease real property acquired with the proceeds of urban renewal financial assistance. Section 308 Would provide for the transfer of certain real property in the District from federal jurisdiction to the District. Section 309 Would provide for reimbursement to the District Department of Corrections by the United States for costs related to the custody and care of certain felons. Section 310 Would provide for non-lapsing appropriation of interest accumulated on previously-appropriated federal payments related to the adoption of children and for the establishment of a scholarship fund for District children without parents due to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack. Section 311 Would authorize the District to enter into a new Interstate Compact for Juveniles and to delegate power and authority to the Interstate Commission for Juveniles; would repeal the congressional reservation of authority for the right to alter, amend, or repeal the existing interstate compact. Section 312 Would make a technical amendment to the Home Rule Act to add a definition for the term “Attorney General.” Section 313 Would make a clarifying amendment to the Home Rule Act to update a citation to the Procurement Practices Act of 1986, which has since been superseded by the Procurement Practices Reform Act of 2010. DRAFT  May 28, 2014 Page 32 of 32 Committee of the Whole Report on Bill 20-749 Section 314 Would enact into law sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Domestic Partnership Police and Fire Amendment Act of 2008. Section 315 Would clarify the law on lotteries and similar games by repealing a proviso from the 1982 appropriations act prohibiting the sale or playing of the lotteries, raffles, bingos, or other games on the Federal enclave, and in adjacent public buildings and land controlled by the Shipstead-Luce Act, as well as in the Old Georgetown Historic District. Section 316 Would subject to sales and use tax certain commercial sales in federal buildings or by federal enterprises and organizations. Section 317 Would exempt bonds issued by the District from all District, State, and Federal taxation. Section 318 Would authorize the District to impose an income tax on a non-resident whose source of income derive from District locally appropriated funds. Section 319 Would authorize the District to impose an income tax on non-resident professional athletes. Section 320 Would authorize and mandate that the District require remote vendors to collect and remit remote sales taxes on sales made via the internet to a purchaser in the District. IX. COMMITTEE ACTION  On May 28, 2014, the Committee met to consider Bill 20-749, the “Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Request Act of 2014.” The meeting was called to order at ____ a.m., and Bill 20-749 was item ____ on the agenda. After ascertaining a quorum (Chairman Mendelson and Councilmembers ____), Chairman Mendelson moved both the print and the report with leave for staff to make technical, conforming, and editorial changes. Following an opportunity for discussion, the vote on the motion ____. The meeting adjourned at ____ a.m. X. 1. 2. 3. 4. ATTACHMENTS  Bill 20-749 as introduced. Certification letter for Bill 20-749. Legal sufficiency determination. Committee print of Bill 20-749. COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington D.C. 20004 Memorandum To : Members of the Council From : Nyasha Smith, Secretary to the Council Date : April 07, 2014 Subject : Referral of Proposed Legislation Notice is given that the attached proposed legislation was introduced in the Office of the Secretary on Thursday, April 3, 2014. Copies are available in Room 10, the Legislative Services Division. TITLE: "Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Request Act of 2014", B20-0749 INTRODUCED BY: Chairman Mendelson at the request of the Mayor The Chairman is referring this legislation to the Committee of the Whole. Attachment cc: General Counsel Budget Director Legislative Services VINCENT C. GRAY MAYOR The Honorable Phil Mendelson Council of the District of Columbia 1350 Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Dear Chainnan Mendelson: On behalf of the residents of the District of Columbia, 1 submit to you the District of Columbia Fiscal Year 2015 Budget and Financial Plan, entitled ?Keeping the Promises.? Enclosed you will ?nd the "Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Request Act of 2014." This proposal is the District of Columbia?s nineteenth consecutive balanced budget. As you know, the District?s economy is experiencing a continuing economic recovery, with more than 34,000 private sector jobs created over the past three years and an unemployment rate that has decreased by three-and-a?half?points the lowest unemployment rate we?ve seen in more than five years. These results have been achieved while still maintaining fiscal responsibility. During the last three years we have insisted on structurally balanced budgets, in which we spent only what we brought in, even when it meant making tough political choices. As a result, we've posted three straight years of budget surpluses and have rebuilt the District's Fund Balance to the highest level in its history $1.75 billion. To support our growing population and continue building a more prosperous, equitable, safe, sustainable city for all, my proposed budget continues to provide investment to build on our economic successes while at the same time harnessing our increasing prosperity to build a stronger, more inclusive city for everyone. The document also includes hard choices that were required to build a ?scally sound budget and financial plan. Our intention was to strike a balance to maintain government services while meeting our economic goals. In this spirit, we are proposing enhancements that include: 0 $100 million in new funding for affordable housing initiatives between Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015; I $116 million in additional funding for public education to tackle the unacceptable achievement gap that persists despite the fact that District students are improving faster than those from any other state in the nation; I $3 00 million for a new East End Medical Center hospital; I $409 million for public schools modernization in Fiscal Year 2015; and I $475 million for streetcars. This budget proposal is balanced, structurally sound, and was forrnulated in a spirit of ?scal discipline. I look forward to the Council?s review of this proposal, and to working together to ?nalize and execute our budget for Fiscal Year 2015. Sin erely, Md 71?? incent C. Gray "chainn-$1? Phil Mendelson at the request of the Mayor A BILL IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA To adopt the request of the District of Columbia government for appropriation and authorization for the ?scal year ending September 30, 2015. BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this act may be cited as the "Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Request Act of 2014". See. 2. The Council of the District of Columbia approves the following expenditure levels and appropriation language for the government of the District of Columbia for the ?scal year ending September 30, 2015. DIVISION A DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPROPRIATION REQUEST TITLE I--FEDERAL FUNDS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURTS FEDERAL PAYMENT To THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Covers For salaries and expenses for the District of Columbia Courts, $255,819,000 to be allocated as follows: for the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, $13,844,000, of which not to exceed $2,500 is for official reception and representation expenses; for the District of Columbia Superior Court, $117,885,000, of which not to exceed $2,500 is for official reception and representation expenses; for the District of Columbia Court System, $72,310,000, of which not to exceed $2,500 is for official reception and representation expenses; and $51,780,000, to remain available until September 30, 2016, for capital improvements for District of Columbia courthouse facilities; provided, that funds made available for capital improvements shall be expended consistent with the District of Columbia Courts master plan study and facilities condition assessment: provided further, that notwithstanding any other provision of law, all amounts under this heading shall be apportioned quarterly by the Office of Management and Budget and obligated and expended in the same manner as funds appropriated for salaries and expenses of other Federal agencies; provided further, that 30 days after providing written notice to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate, the District of Columbia Courts may reallocate not more than $6,000,000 of the funds provided under this heading among the items and entities funded under this heading: Provided further, That the Joint Committee on Judicial Administration in the District of Columbia may, by regulation, establish a program substantially similar to the program set forth in subchapter ll of chapter 35 of title 5, United States Code, for individuals serving the District of Columbia Courts. FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR DEFENDER SERVICES IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURTS For payments authorized under section ll?2604 and section 1 1-2605 of the. District of Columbia Official Code (relating to representation provided under the District of Columbia Criminal Iustice Act), payments for counsel appointed in proceedings in the Family Court of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia under Chapter 23 of Title 16 of the District of Columbia Official Code, or pursuant to contractual agreements to provide guardian ad litem representation, training, technical assistance, and such other services as are necessary to improve the quality of guardian ad litem representation, payments for counsel appointed in adoption proceedings under Chapter 3 of Title 16 of the District of Columbia Official Code, and payments authorized under section 21-2060 of the District of Columbia Official Code (relating to services provided under the District of Columbia Guardianship, Protective Proceedings, and Durable Power of Attorney Act of 1936), $49,390,000, to remain available until expended; provided, that funds provided under this heading shall be administered by the Joint Committee on Judicial Administration in the District of Columbia; provided further, that notwithstanding any other provision of law, this appropriation shall be apportioned quarterly by the Office of Management and Budget and obligated and expended in the same manner as funds appropriated for expenses of other Federal agencies. FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR RESIDENT TUITION SUPPORT For a Federal payment to the District of Columbia, to be deposited into a dedicated account, for a nationwide program to be administered by the Mayor, for District of Columbia resident tuition support, $40,000,000, to remain available until expended; provided, that such funds, including any interest accrued thereon, may he used on behalf of eligible District of Columbia residents to pay an amount based upon the difference between in-State and out-of- State tuition at public institutions of higher education, or to pay up to $2,500 each year at eligible private institutions of higher education; provided further, that the awarding of such funds may be prioritized on the basis of a resident's academic merit, the income and need of eligible students and such other factors as may be authorized; provided further, that the District of Columbia government shall maintain a dedicated account for the Resident Tuition Support Program that shall consist of the Federal funds appropriated to the Program in this Act and any subsequent appropriations, any unobligated balances from prior fiscal years, and any interest earned in this or any fiscal year; provided further, that the account shall be under the control of the District of Columbia Chief Financial Officer, who shall use those funds solely for the purposes of carrying out the Resident Tuition Support Program; provided further, that the Office of the Chief Financial Officer shall provide a quarterly financial report to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate for these funds showing, by object class, the expenditures made and the purpose therefor. FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT For a Federal payment to a school improvement program in the District of Columbia, $43,000,000, to remain available until expended, as authorized under the Scholarship for Opportunity and Results Act, approved April 15, 2011 (division of Pub. L. No. ll2?10; 1'25 Stat. 38), to be allocated as follows: for the District of Columbia Public-Schools, $20,000,000 to improve public school education in the District of Columbia; for the State Education Office, $20,000,000 to expand quality public charter schools in the District of Columbia; and for the activities speci?ed in sections 3007(b) througb3007(d) and 3009 of the Act, $3,000,000. FEDERAL PAYMENT TO THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND SEWER AUTHORITY For a Federal payment to the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority, $16,000,000, to remain available until expended, to continue implementation of the Combined Sewer Over?ow Long-Term Plan; provided, that the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority provides a 100 percent match for this payment. FEDERAL PAYMENT TO THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL For a Federal payment to the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council, $1,900,000, to remain available until expended, to support initiative-s related to the coordination of Federal and local criminal justice resources in the District of Columbia. FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR JUDICIAL COMMISSIONS For a Federal payment, to remain available until September 30, 2016, to the Commission on Judicial Disabilities and Tenure, $295,000, and for the Judicial Nomination Commission, $2?0,000. FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL GUARD For a Federal payment to the District of Columbia National Guard, $435,000, to remain available until expended. FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR TESTING AND TREATMENT OF HIVIAIDS For a Federal payment to the District of Colurnbia for the testing of individuals for, and the treatment of individuals with, human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immunode?ciency in the District of Columbia, $5,000,000. FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR D.C. COMMISSION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES GRANTS For a Federal payment to the District of Coltunbia Commission on the Arts and Humanities, $1,000,000, to fund competitively awarded grants for non-pro?t fine and performing arts organizations based in and primarily serving the District of Columbia. FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR EMERGENCY PLANNING AND SECURITY COSTS IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA For a Federal payment of necessary expenses, as determined by the Mayor of the District. of Columbia in written consultation with the elected county or city officials of surrounding jurisdictions, $14,900,000, to remain available-until expended an_d in addition any funds that '1 remain available from prior year appropriations under this heading for the District of Columbia Government, for the costs of providing public safety at events related to the presence of the national capital in the District of Columbia, including support requested by the Director of the United States Secret Service Division in carrying out protective duties under the direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for the costs of providing support to respond to immediate and speci?c terrorist threats or attacks in the District of Columbia or surrounding jurisdictions. TITLE II--DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OF EXPENSES The following amounts are appropriated for the District of Columbia for the current fiscal year out of the General Fund of the District of Columbia (?General Fund?), except as otherwise speci?cally provided; provided, that notwithstanding any other provision of law, except as provided in section 450A of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved November 2, 2000 (114 Stat. 2440; DC. Official Code and provisions of this Act, the total amount appropriated in this Act for operating expenses for the District of Columbia for fiscal year 2015 under this heading shall not exceed the lesser of the sum of the total revenues of the District of Columbia for such ?scal year or $12,618,-418,000 (of which $7,065,55l,000 shall be from local fu-nds (including $221,410,000 from dedicated taxes), $959,942,000 shall be from Federal grant funds, $2,0?4,8l 1,000 from Medicaid payments, $590,43 0,000 shall be from other funds, and $2,129,000 shall be from private funds, and $83,800,000 shall be from ?mds previously appropriated in this Act as Federal payments, which does not include ?inds appropriated under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, approved February 17, 2009 (123 Stat. 115; 26 U.S.C. 1, note), $1 ,184,7'55,000 shall be from enterprise and other funds; provided further, that of the local funds, such amounts as may be necessary may be derived tiom the District's General Fund balance; provided further, that of these funds the District?s intra-District authority shall be $71 8,3 05,000; in addition, for capital construction projects, an increase of $2,966,443,000, of which $2,613,l3.8,000 shall be from local funds, $74,288,000 from the Local Transportation Fund, $24,785,000 from the District of Columbia Highway Trust Fund, and $254,23 0,000 from Federal grant funds, and a rescission of $793,969,000, of which $523,098,000 is from local funds, $-5,8l6,000from the Local Transportation Fund, $24,751,000 ?'om the District of Columbia Highway Trust Fund, and $40,304,000 from Federal grant funds appropriated under this heading in prior ?scal years, for a net amount of to remain available until expended; provided further, that the amounts provided under this heading are to be available, allocated, and expended as proposed under this title and Title of this Act, at the rate set forth under ?District of Columbia Funds Division of Expenses? as included in the Fiscal Year 2015 Proposed Budget and Financial Plan submitted to the Congress by the District of Columbia; provided further, that, notwithstanding any other provision of law, upon the first enactment of the District's budget request under this Act, through September 30, 2015, during a period in which there is an absence of a federal appropriations act authorizing the expenditure of local funds, the District of Columbia is authorized to obligate and expend local ?mds for programs and activities at the rate set forth in this Act and to approve and execute ieprograrnrning requests of local funds pursuant to section 446 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 777; DC. Official Code 1-2 04.46); provided further, that this amount may be increased by proceeds of one-time transactions, which are expended for emergency or unanticipated operating or capital needs; provided further, that such increases shall be approved by enactment of local District law and shall comply with all reserve requirements contained in the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, i973. (87 Stat. 777; D.C. Official Code 1-201.01 et seq.), as amended by this Act; provided further, that the Chief Financial O?icer of the District of Columbia shall take such steps as are necessary to assure that the District of Columbia meets these requirements, including the apportioning by the Chief Financial Officer of the appropriations and funds made available to the District during ?scal year 2015; except, that the Chief Financial Officer may not reprogram for operating expenses any funds derived from bonds, notes, or other obligations issued for capital projects. TITLE OF COLUMBIA FUNDS - DIVISION OF EXPENSES OPERATING EXPENSES GOVERNMENTAL DIRECTION AND SUPPORT Governmental direction and support, $781,127,000 (including $634,776,000 from local funds, $27,330,000 from Federal grant funds, $63,130,000 from other funds, and $391,000 from private funds): provided, that there are appropriated such additional amounts as may be necessary to account vendor fees that are paid as a ?xed percentage of revenue recovered from third parties on behalf of the District under contracts that provide for payments of fees based upon such revenue as may be collected by the vendor; provided further, that any program fees collected from the issuance of debt shall be available for the payment of expenses of the debt management program of the District, to be allocated as follows: (1) Council of the District of Columbia. ?$22,25 5,000 from local funds; provided, that not to exceed $25,000_shall be available for the Chair-man from this appropriation for official reception and representation expenses and for purposes consistent with the Discretionary Funds Act of 1973, approved October 26, 1973 (87 Stat. 509; DC. Official Code provided, that all funds deposited into the Council Technology Projects Fund are, Without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (2) Office of the District of Columbia Auditor. ?$4,566,000 from local funds; (3) Advisory Neighborhood Commissions. ?$924,000 from local funds; provided, that all funds deposited into the Agency Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (4) Uniform Law Commission. $50,000 from local funds; (5) Office of the Mayor. -$11,729,000 (including $8,734,000 from local funds and $2,995,000 from Federal grant funds); provided, that not to exceed $25,000 shall be available for the Mayor for official reception and representation expenses; (6) Office of the Secretary. ?$4,0l5,000 (including $3,015,000 from local funds and $1,000,000 from other funds); provided that all funds deposited into the Emancipation Day Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (7) City Administrator. ?$3,591,000 from local funds provided, that not to exceed $10,600 shall be available for the City Administrator for official reception and representation expenses; (8) Office of Risk Management. from local funds; 5 (9) Department of Human Resources. (including $8,435,000 from local funds and $292,000 from other funds); (10) Office of Disability Rights. ?$l,580,000 (including $1,043,000 from local funds and $536,000 from Federal grant funds); (1 1) Captive Insurance Agency. ?$l,850,000 (including $1,795,000 from local funds and $55,000 from other funds); provided that all funds deposited into the Agency Fund (Free Standing Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Captive Insurance Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (12) Office of Finance and Resource Management-. (including $21,203,000 from local funds and $506,000 from other funds); (13) Office of Contracting and Procurement. (including from $17,770,000 from local funds and $375,000 from other funds); (14) Office of Chief Technology Officer. ?$7l,23 ,000 (including $57,383,000 from local funds, and $13,848,000 from other funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the D.C. Net Service Support Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (15) Department of General Services. $3 1 0,821,000 (including $304,496,000 from local funds and $6,325,000 from other funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the Eastern Market Enterprise Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (16) Contract Appeals Board. ~$I,l26,000 from local funds; (17) Board of Elections. from local funds; (18) Office of Campaign Finance. ?$2,798,000 from local ?lnds; provided, that all funds deposited into the Special Purpose Revenue fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (19) Public Employee Relations Board. from local funds; (20) Office of Employee Appeals. $1,570,000 from local funds; (21) Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. 0,000 from local funds; (22) Office of the Attorney General. ?$89,60l ,000 (including $66,164,000 from local funds, $21,202,000 from Federal grant funds, $1,844,000 from other funds, and $391,000 from private funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the Child SPT TAN GKAFDC Collections Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Child SPT Reimbursements and Fees Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Child SPT lnterest income Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Nuisance Abatement Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (23) Board of Ethics and Government Accountability. ?$l,498,000 (including $1,438,000 from local funds and $60,000 from other funds); provided, that all ?uids deposited into the Lobbyist Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Board of 6 Ethics and Accountability Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for ?expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (24) innovation Fund. $15,000,000 from local funds; (25) Office of the Inspector General. ?$l6,920,000 (including $14,348,000 from local funds and $2,522,000 from Federal grant funds); and; (26) Office of the Chief Financial Officer. -$158,829,000 (including $114,528,000 from local funds, $525,000 from Federal grant funds and $43,826,000 from other funds); provided, that not to exceed $10,600 shall be available for the Chief Financial Of?cer for official reception and representation expenses; provided further, that amounts appropriated by this Act may be increased by the amount required to pay banking fees for maintaining the funds of the District of Columbia; provided further, that all funds deposited into the OFT Central Collection Unit Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided ?irther, that all f J?dS deposited into the Recorder of Deeds Surcharge Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION Economic development and regulation, $469,506,000 (including $185,194,000 from local funds (including $1,170,000 from dedicated taxes), 106,562,000 from Federal grant funds, $176,646,000 from other funds, $103,000 from private funds, and $1,000,000 from funds previously appropriated from this Act under the heading ?Federal Payment for DC. Commission on the Arts and Humanities Grants?), to be allocated as follows: (1) Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development. 6,603,000 (including $14,714,000 from local funds, $1,800,000 from Federal grant funds, and $20,088,000 from other funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the Industrial Revenue Bond program are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Street Retail Priority Area Grant Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended. (2) Office of Planning. ?$9,899,000 (including $9,309,000 from local funds, $5 09,000 from Federal grant funds, $80,000 from other ?lnds, and $1,000 from private funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the Historic Landmark and Historic District Filing Fees (Local) Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Historical Landmark and Historic District Filing Fees (O-Type) Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (3) Department of Small and Local Business Development. $8,846,000 (including $8,385,000 from local funds and $461,000 from Federal grant funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the Small Business Micro Loan Fund are, vvithout regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (4) Office of Motion Picture and Television Development. (including $2,105,000 ??orn local funds and. $95,000 from other funds; provided, that all funds deposited into -the Film DC Economic Incentive Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (5) Office of Zoning. ~$2,705,000 from local funds; (6) Department of Housing and Community Development. (including $15,625,000 from local funds, $41,354,000 from Federal grant funds, and $6,500,000 from other funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the CU 1&2 Affordable Housing Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the DHCD Uni?ed Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Land Acquisition for Housing Development Opportunities (LAHDO) Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the RLF Escrow Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Rehab Repay Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Home Again Revolving Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the I-IPAP - Repay Fund are, Without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (7) Department of Employment Services. ?$l50,174,000 (including $54,312,000 from local funds, $61,414,000 from Federal grant funds, $34,368,000 from other funds, and $80,000 from private that all funds deposited into the Workers? Compensation Administration Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the UI Administrative Assessment Tax Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided ?irther, that all funds deposited into the UI lnteresUPenalties Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Workers? Compensation Special Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Reed Act Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (8) Real Property Tax Appeals Commission. from local funds; (9) Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs. ?$48,463,000 (including $l5,l62,000 from local funds and $33,301,000 from other funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the Basic Business License Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Green Building Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the R-E Guar. dc Educ. Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended-; provided ?irther, that all funds deposited into the Nuisance Abatement Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the OPLA - Special Account are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Board of Engineers Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all deposited into the Corporate Recordation Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (10) Office of the Tenant Advocate. from local funds; (1 1) Commission on Arts and Humanities. -$16,460,000 (including $14,603,000 from local funds, $658,000 from Federal grant funds, $200,000 from other funds, and $1,000,000 from funds previously appropriated from this Act, under the heading ?Federal Payment for D.C. Commission on the Arts and Humanities Grants?, to fund competitively awarded grants for nonpro?t ?ne and performing arts organizations based in and primarily serving the District); provided, that all funds deposited into the Special Purpose Revenue Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (12) Alcoholic Beverage Regulation Administration. (including $1,170,000 from local funds (including $1,170,000 from dedicated taxes and $6,226,000 from other funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the ABC Import And Class License Fees Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for e'xp'er1diture and shall remain available until expended; (13) Public Service Commission. $12,549,000 (including $3 67,000 from Federal grant ?mds, 59,000 from other funds, and 22,000 from private funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the Operating - Utility Assessment Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the PJM Settlement Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (14) Office of the People?s Counsel. ?$6,9ll,000 from other funds; provided, that all funds deposited into the.Advocate for Consumers Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (15) Department of Insurance, Securities, and Banking. ?$22,l18,000 from other funds; provided, that all funds deposited into the Foreclosure Mediation Fund (Temporary) Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Insurance Assessment Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the HMO Assessment Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Foreclosure Mediation Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Capital Access Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (16) Office of Cable Television. ?$9,549,000 from other funds; provided, that all funds deposited into the Cable Franchise Fees Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (17) Housing Authority Subsidy Payment. ?$42,963,000 from local funds; and (18) Business Improvement Districts Transfer. $25,000,000 from other funds. Punuo AND JUSTICE Public safety andjustice, $1,185,287,000 (including $999,282,000 from local funds, $129,257,000 from Federal grant funds, $60,000 from Medicaid payments, $53,788,000 from other funds, $43 5,000 from funds previously appropriated in this Act under the heading ?Federal Payment for the DC. National Guard?, $1,900,000 from funds previously appropriated in this Act under the heading ?Federal Payment to the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council?, and $5 65,000 from funds previously appropriated in this Act under the heading ?Federal Payment for Judicial Commissions?), to be allocated as follows: (1) Metropolitan Police Department. ?$489,480,000 (including $478,100,000 from local funds, $4,010,000 from Federal grant funds, $7,320,000 from other funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the Asset Forfeiture Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (2) Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department. ?$205,999,000 (including $202,841,000 from local funds $1,638,000 from Federal grant funds, and $1,520,000 from other funds); (3) Police Officers? and Fire?ghters? Retirement System. from local funds; (4) Department of Corrections. 52,610,000 (including $124,349,000 from local funds, and $28,260,000 from other funds); provided, that all ?inds deposited into the Correction Trustee Reimbursement Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Welfare Account are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Correction Reimbursement-Juveniles Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (5) District of Columbia National Guard. -$12,704,000 (including $5,066,000 from local funds, $7,204,000 from Federal grant funds, and $435,000 from ?mds previously appropriated in this Act under the heading ?Federal Payment for the District of Coltunbia National Guar provided, that the Mayor shall reimburse the District of Columbia National Guard for expenses incurred in connection with services that are performed in emergencies by the National Guard in a militia status and are requested by the Mayor, in amounts that shall be jointly determined and certi?ed as due and payable for these services by the Mayor and the Commanding General of the District of Columbia National Guard; provided further, that-such sums as may be necessary for reimbursement to the District of Columbia National Guard under the preceding proviso shall be available pursuant to this Act, and the availability of the sums shall be deemed as constituting payment in advance for emergency services involved; (6) Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency. ~$l09,5 53,000 (including $2,085,000 from local funds and $107,467,000 from Federal grant funds); (7) Commission on Judicial Disabilities and Tenure. $295,000 from funds previously appropriated in this Act under the heading ?Federal Payment for Judicial Commissions?; (8) Judicial Nomination Commission. $270,000 from funds previously appropriated in this Act under the heading ?Federal Payment for Judicial Commissions; (9) Office of Police Complaints. ?$2,241,000 from local funds; (10) District of Columbia Sentencing and Criminal Code Revision Commission. $1,401,000 from local funds; (1 l) Office of the Chief Medical Examiner. 1 9,000 ?*om local funds; (12) Office of Administrative Hearings. ?$8,763,000 (including $8,203,000 from local funds and $60,000 from Medicaid payments); (13) Criminal Justice Coordinating Council. (including $526,000 from local funds, and $1,900,000 from funds previously appropriated in this Act under the heading ?Federal Payment to the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council?); 10 (I4) Office of Unified Communications. -$43,481,000 (including $28,250,000 from local funds, and $15,231,000 from other ?mds); provided, that all funds deposited into the 911 311 Assessments Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Prepaid Wireless 911 Charges Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (15) Department of Forensic Sciences. ?$l5,025,000 (including $14,266,000 from local funds and $759,000 from Federal grant funds); (16) Deputy Mayor for Public Safety and Justice 8,090,000 (including $18,505,000 from local funds, $8,179,000 from? Federal grant funds, and $1,406,000 from other funds); provided further, that not less than $200,_000 shall be available to fund the District of Columbia Poverty Lawyer Loan Assistance Program, established by the Access to Justice lnitiative.A1nendment Act of2011, effective September 14, 2011 (D.C. Law 19-21; D.C. Official Code 4-1701 .01 et seq.); provided ?trther, that $3,628,000 shall be made available to award a grant to the District of Columbia Bar Foundation for the purpose of providing support to nonprofit organizations that deliver civil legal services to low-income and under-served District residents; provided further, that $1,000,000 shall be transferred to the Community-based Violence Reduction Fund, established by section 3014 of the Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Support Act of 2008, effective August 16, 2008 (DC. Law 1?-219; D.C. Official Code for use by the Justice Grants Administration for the purpose of providing grants for the development of programs to intervene with children who are chronically truant; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Crime Victims Assistance Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided. further, that all funds deposited into the Domestic Violence Shelter Transitional Housing Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Community Based Violence Reduction Fund (The Truancy Fund) are, without regard to ?-scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended. PUBLIC Eoucarron SYSTEM Public education system, including the development of national-defense education programs, $2,194,335,000 (including $1,854,5l6,000 from local funds, $264,429,000 from Federal grant funds, $15,273,000 from other funds, $117,000 from private funds, $40,000,000 from funds previously appropriated in this Act- under the heading ?Federal Payment for Resident Tuition Support?, and $43,000,000 from previously appropriated in this Act under the heading ?Federal Payment for School Improvement?), to be allocated as follows: (1) District of Columbia Public Schools. ?$762,347,000 (including $701,345,000 from local funds, $53,458,000 from Federal grant funds, and $7,544,000 from other funds; provided, that this appropriation shall not be available to subsidize the education of any nonresident of the District at any District public elementary or secondary school during ?scal year 2015 tuiless the nonresident pays tuition to the District at a rate that covers 100 percent of the costs incurred by the District that are attributable to the education of the nonresident (as established by the Chancellor of the District of Columbia Public Schools); provided further, that not to exceed $10,600 for the Chancellor shall be available for official reception and representation expenses; provided further, that, notwithstanding the amounts otherwise provided under this heading or any other provision of law, there shall be appropriated to the District of 11 Columbia Public Schools on July 1, 2014, an amount equal to 10 percent of the total amount of the local funds appropriations request provided for the District of Columbia Public Schools in the proposed budget of the District of Columbia for ?scal year 2015 (as submitted to Congress), and the amount of- such payment shall be chargeable against the ?nal amount provided for the District of Columbia Public Schools under the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 2015; provided further, that all funds deposited into the E-Rate Education Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, _that all funds deposited into the ROTC Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into.the Afterschool Program-Copayment Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended;_ (2) Teachers? Retirement System. -333 9,513,000 from local funds; (3) Office of the State Superintendent of Education. (including $134,449,000 from local funds, $210,068,000 from Federal grant ?mds, $448,000 from other ?utds, $117,000 from private funds, $40,000,000 from funds previously appropriated in this Act under the heading ?Federal Payment for Resident Tuition Support?, and $20,000,000 from funds previously appropriated in the Act under the heading ?Federal Payment for School Improvement?); provided, that of the amounts provided to the Office of the State Superintendent of Education, $1,000,000 from local funds shall remain available until June 30, 2015, for an audit of the student enrollment of each Districtof Columbia public school and of each District of Columbia public charter school; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Blackman and ones Consent Decree Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Charter School Credit Enhancement Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided fuither, that all funds deposited into the Student Residency Veri?cation Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the State Athletic Acts Program Of?ce Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, -that all funds deposited into the Community Schools Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (4) District of Colurnbia Public Charter Schools. -$674,129,000 from local funds; provided, that there -shall be quarterly disbursement of funds to the District of Columbia public charter schools, with the first payment to occur within 15 days of the beginning of the ?scal year; provided further, that if the entirety of this allocation has not been provided as payments to any public charter schools currently in operation through the per pupil funding formula, the funds shall remain available until expended for public education in accordance with section 2403 of the District of Columbia School Reform Act of 1995, approved April 26, 1996 (110 Stat. 1321; DC. Official Code provided ?irther, that of the amounts made available to District of Columbia public charter schools, $230,000 shall be made available to the Office of the Chief Financial Officer as authorized by section 2403 (b)(6)of the District of Columbia School Reform Act of 1995, approved April 26, 1996 (110 Stat. 1321; DC. Official Code provided further, that, notwithstanding the amounts otherwise provided under this heading or any other provision of law, there shall be appropriated to the District of Columbia public charter schools on July I, 2014, an amount equal to 30 percent of the total amount of the local funds appropriations request provided for payments to public charter 12 schools in the proposed budget of the District of Columbia for fiscal year 2015 (as submitted to Congress), and the amount of such payment shall be chargeable against the final amount provided for such payments under the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 2015; provided further, that the annual ?nancial audit for the performance of an individual District of Columbia public charter school shall be funded by the charter school; (5) University of the District of Columbia Subsidy. $70,983,000 from local funds; provided, that this appropriation shall not be available to subsidize the education of nonresidents of the District at the University of the. District of Columbia, unless the Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia adopts, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015, a tuition? rate schedule that will establish the tuition rate for nonresident students at a level no lower than the nonresident tuition rate charged at comparable public institutions of higher education in themetropolitan area; provided further, that, notwithstanding the amounts otherwise provided under this heading or any other provision of law, there shall be appropriated to the University of the District of Columbia on July 1, 2014, an amount equal to 10 percent of the total amount of the local funds appropriations request provided for the University of the District of Columbia in the proposed budget of the District of Columbia for fiscal year 2015 (as submitted to Congress), and the amount of such payment shall be chargeable against the final amount provided for the University of the District of Columbia under? the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 2015; provided further, that not to exceed $10,600 for the President of the University of the District of Columbia shall be available for official reception and representation expenses; (6) District of Columbia Public Library. (including $56,235,000 from local funds, $903,000 from Federal grant funds, and $540,000 from other funds); provided, that not to exceed $3,5 00 for the Public Librarian shall be available for official reception and representation expenses; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Copies and Printing Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the SLD E?Rate Reimbursement Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Library Collections Account are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (7) Public Charter School Board. ?$6,74l,000 from other ?lnds; (8) Non-Public Tuition. $79,970,000 from local funds; (9) Special Education Transportation. ?$93,562,000. from local funds; provided, that, notwithstanding the amounts otherwise provided under this heading or any other provision of law, there shall be appropriated to the Special Education Transportation agency under the direction of the Office of the State Superintendent of Education, on July 1, 2014, an amount equal to 10 percent of the total amount of the local funds appropriations request provided for the Special Education Transportation agency in the proposed budget of the District of Columbia for ?scal year 2014 (as submitted to Congress), and the amount of such payment shall be chargeable against the final amount provided for the Special Education Transportation agency under the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 2015; provided further, that amounts appropriated under this heading may be used to offer ?nancial incentives as necessary to reduce the number of routes serving 2 or fewer students; (10) District of Columbia State Board of Education. ?$891,000 from lo.cal funds; and 13 (I 1) Of?ce of the Deputy Mayor for Education. ?$3,390,000 from local funds. HUMAN Suvrour S1: avrcas Human support services, $4,339,925,000 (including $l,323,793,000 from local funds (including $65,329,000 from dedicated taxes), $403,871,000 from Federal grant funds, $2,024,751,-000 from Medicaid payments, $31,937,000 from other $523,000 from private funds, and $5,000,000 from funds previously appropriated in this Act under the heading ?Federal Payment for HIWAIDS Prevention?); to be allocated as follows; (1) Department of Human Services. ~$396,640,000 (including $224,462,000 from local funds, $156,448,000 from Federal grant funds, $14,529,000 from Medicaid payments, and $1,200,000 from other funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the SSI Payback Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (2) Child and Family Services Agency. (including $171,325,000 from local funds", $65,555,000 from Federal grant funds, $1 ,200, 000 from other funds, and $41,000 from private funds); (3) Department of Behavioral Health. ?$258,773,000 (including $232,674,000 from local ?mds, $18,539,000 from Federal grant funds, $3,500,000 from Medicaid payments, $3,588,000 from other funds, and $472,000 from private funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the APRA Choice in Drug Treatment (HCSN) Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; in addition to the funds otherwise appropriated under this Act, the Department of Behavioral Health may expend any funds that are or were paid by the United States Virgin Islands to the District in fiscal year 2014 or fiscal year 2015 to compensate the District for care previously provided by the District to patients at the St. Elizabeths hospital and are not otherwise appropriated under this Act; provided, that the availability of the funds is certified by the Chief Financial Officer before any expenditure; provided further, that the shall be expended in a manner determined by the Director of the Department of Behavioral Health; (4) Department of Health. ?$2l 9,917,000 (including $76,306,000 from local funds, $126,219,000 from Federal grant funds, $12,393,000 from other funds, and $5,000,000 from funds previously appropriated in this Act under the heading ?Federal Payment for HIWAIDS Prevention?); provided, that all funds deposited into the Health Professional Recruitment Fund (Medical Loan Repayment) are, without regard to fiscal year, au.thorize'd for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Board of Medicine. Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Pharmacy Protection Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and ?shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all fundsdeposited into the SI-IPDA Fees Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further,_ that all funds deposited into the Civic Monetary Penalties Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the SI-IPDA Admission Fee Fund are, Without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the ICFIMR Fees dc Fines are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; I4 provided further, that all funds deposited into the Human Services Facility Fee Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (5) Department of Parks and Recreation. ?$43,047,000 (including $40,627,000 from local funds and $2,420,000 from other funds); (6) Office on Aging. (including $31,724,000 from local funds and $7,736,000 from Federal grant ?lnds); (7) District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Fund. 4 $6,887,000 from local funds; (8) Employees? Compensation Fund. ?$20,221,000 from local funds; provided, that all funds deposited into the Worker's Compensation Rev?Settlement Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until" expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Agency Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expendedg; (9) Ofiice of Human Rights. ?$2,967,000 (including $2,700,000 from local funds and" $267,000 from Federal grant funds); (10) Office on Latino Affairs. ?$2,769,000 from local funds; (1 1) Children and Youth Investment Collaborative. $3,000,000 from local funds; (12) Office of Asian and Paci?c Islander Affairs. +$323,000 from local. funds; (13) Office of Veterans? Affairs. ~$4l6,000 (including $41 1,000 from local ?uids and $5,000 from other funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the Office of Veterans Affairs Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shali remain available until expended; (14) Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services. ?$109,3 32,000 from local funds; provided, -that amounts appropriated herein may be expended to implement the provisions of section 105(k) of the Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services Establishment Act of 2004, effective April 12, 2005 (D.C. Law 15-335; D.C. Official Code provided further, that of the local funds appropriated for the Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services, $12,000 shall be used to fund the requirements of the Interstate Compact for Juveniles; (15) Department of Disability Services. ?$i53,000,000 (including $115,930,000 from local funds, $27,014,000 from Federal grant funds, $7,497,000 from Medicaid payments, $7,550,000 from other funds, and $10,000 from private funds,); provided that all funds deposited into the Randolph Shepherd Unassigned Facilities Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until "expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Cost of Care-Non-Medicaid Clients Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (16) Department of Health Care Finance. -$2,838,381 ,000 (including $7-83,431,000 from local funds (including $65,829,000 from dedicated taxes), $2,093,000 from Federal grant funds, $2,049,225,000 from Medicaid payments, and $3,632,000 from other funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the Healthy DC Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Nursing Homes Quality of Care Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Stevie Sellovv's Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Medicaid Collections-3rd Party Liability Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, 15 authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Bill Of Rights (Grievance and Appeals) Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; and Deputy Mayor for Health and Human Services. from local funds. PUBLIC Wonxs Public works, including rental of one passenger?carrying vehicle for use by the Mayor and 3 passenger-carrying vehicles for use by the Council of the District of Columbia and leasing of passenger?carrying vehicles, $718,118,000 (including $534,631,000 from local funds (including $62,636,000 from dedicated taxes), $27,992,000 from Federal grant funds, $154,500,000 from other funds, and $995,000 from private funds), to be allocated as follows: (1) Department of Public Works. ?$l29,044,000 (including $121,594,000 from local funds and $7,450,000 from other funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the Solid Waste Disposal Fee Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Super Can Program Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (2) Department of Transportation. 10,25 0,000 (including $84,270,000 from local funds, $3,610,000 from Federal grant funds, and $22,370,000 from other funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the Bicycle Sharing Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Performance Parking Program Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the ?Tree Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the - DDOT Enterprise Fund-Non Tax Revenues Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Sustainable Transportation Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (3) Department of Motor Vehicles. (including $28,315,000 from local funds and $10,116,000 from other ?mds); provided, that all funds deposited into the Motor Vehicle Inspection Station Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (4) Department of the Environment. ?$l03,658,000 (including $137,504,000 from local funds, $24,332,000 from Federal grant funds, $60,777,000 from other funds, and $995,000 from private funds); provided, that all ?inds deposited into the Storm Water Permit Review Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Sustainable Energy Trust Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all ?inds deposited into the Brown?eld Revitalization Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Anacostia River Clean Up Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Wetlands Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided 16 that all funds deposited into the Energy Assistance Trust Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Lust Trust Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Soil Erosion! Sediment Control Fund are, Withoutregard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the DC Municipal Aggregation Program Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Fishing License Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Renewable Energy Development Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Special Energy Assessment Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Air Quality Construction Permits Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Utility Discount Program Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; (5) Taxicab Commission. ?$8,270,000 (including $1,000,000 from local funds, and $2,270,000 from other funds); provided, that all funds deposited into the Taxicab Assessment Act Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Public Vehicles for Hire Consumer Service Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall rem-ain available until expended; (6) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission. ?$l27,000 from local funds; and (7) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. (including $281,822,000 from local funds (including $62,686,000 from dedicated taxes), and $46,517,000 from other funds); provided,_ that all funds deposited into the Dedicated Taxes Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended; provided further, that all funds deposited into the Parking Meter WMATA Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended. FINANCING AND OTHER Financing and Other, $l,088,36-4,000 (including $983,359,000 from local funds (including $141,725,000 from dedicated taxes), $90,105,000 from other funds, and $14,900,000 from funds previously appropriated in this Act under the heading ?Federal Payment for Emergency Planning and Security Costs in the District of Columbia?), to be allocated as follows: (1) Repayment of Loans and Interest. ?$600,694,000 (including $570,776,000 from local funds and $29,918,000 from other funds); for payment of principal, interest, and certain fees directly resulting from borrowing by the District of Columbia to fund District of Columbia capital projects as authorized by sections 462, 475, and 490 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (837 Stat. 727; D.C. Official Code 1- 204.62, 1?204.75, and (2) Short-Term Borrowing. ?$5,000,000 from local funds for payment of interest on short-term borrowing; 17 (3) Certificates of Participation. for lease payments representing principal and interest on the District?s Certi?cates of Participation, issued to ?nance land and buildings for the Uni?ed Communications Center and Office of Uni?ed Communications, located on the St. Elizabeths Campus, $22,670,000 from local funds; (4) Debt Issuance Costs. for the payment of debt service issuance costs, $6,000,000 from local funds; (5) Schools Modernization Fund. for the Schools Modernization Fund, established by section 4042 of the Schools Modernization Amendment Act of 2005, effective October 20, 2005 (DC. Law 16-33; D.C. Official Code $11,412,000 from local funds; (6) Revenue Bonds. for the repayment of revenue bonds, $7,83 9,000 from local funds (including $7,839,000 from dedicated taxes); (7) Settlements and Judgments. for making re?inds and for the payment of legal settlements or judgments that have been entered against the District of Columbia government, $21,292,000 from local funds; provided, that this appropriation shall not be construed as modifying or affecting the provisions of section 101 of this Act; (8) Wilson Building. for expenses associated with the John A. Wilson building, $4,469,000 from local funds; (9) Workforce investments. for workforce investments, $4l,03 0,000 from local funds; provided, that ail funds deposited into the CU 1&2 Compensation and Class Reform Fund are, without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended (10) Non-Departmental. to account for anticipated costs that cannot be allocated to specific agencies during the development of the proposed budget, $18,653,000 (including $3,000,000 from local funds and "$15,653,000 from other funds), to be transferred by the Mayor of the District of Columbia within the various appropriations headings in this Act; (1 1) Emergency Planning and Security Costs. $14,900,000 from funds previously appropriated in this Act under the heading ?Federal Payment for Emergency Planning and Security Costs in the District of Columbia?; provided, that, notwithstanding any other law, the District of Columbia may charge obligations and expenditures that are pending reimbursement under the heading ?Federal Payment for Emergency Planning and Security Costs in the District of Columbia? to this local appropriations heading; (12) Master Equipment Lease Purchase Program. -$51,548,000 from local funds; (13) Pay-As-You?Go Capital funds. in lieu of capital ?nancing, $40,352,000 (including $11,336,000 from local ?lnds and $29,016,000 from other funds) to be transferred to the Capital Fund; (14) District Retiree Health Contribution. for a District Retiree Heaith Contribution, $90,100,000 from local funds; (15) Highway Trust Fund Transfer. ?$37,685,000 (including $22,167,000 from local funds (including $22,167,000 dedicated taxes) and $15,518,000 from other funds); and (16) Convention Center Transfer. from local funds (including $111,719,000 from dedicated taxes). 18 CONTINGENCY If the Chief Financial Officer of the District of Columbia certi?es through a revised revenue estimate in June 2014 that up to $52,321,000 in excess revenue is available from local funds, up to $52,321,000 is appropriated for obligation and expenditure by the District in accordance with acts enacted by the Council, which shall specify the use and amount for each obligation and expenditure. Such acts shall not be considered a supplemental budget act as defined in section 446 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 Stat. 727; DC. Official Code and any obligations and expenditures may be. authorized immediately upon enactment of such acts. ENTERPRISE AND OTHER FUNDS The amount of $l,841,?5S,000 from enterprise and other ?mds, shall be provided to enterprise funds as follows; provided, that, in the event that certain dedicated revenues exceed budgeted amounts, the District may increase its General Fund budget authority as needed to transfer all such revenues, pursuant to local law, to the Highway Trust Fund, the Washington Convention Center, and the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority. WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY Pursuant to section 445a of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved August 6, 1996 (110 Stat. 1698; DC. Official Code which provides that the Council may comment and make recommendations concerning such annual estimates but shall have no authority to revise the budget for the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority, the Council forwards this nornappropriated budget request: For operation of the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority, $5 1 5,95 9,000 from enterprise and other funds, of which no outstanding debt exists for repayment of loans and interest incurred for capital improvement projects and payable tothe District?s debt service fund. For construction projects, $5 5 4,303 ,000, to be distributed as follows: $48,100,000, for the Sanitary Sewer System; $1 1,627,000 for the Water System; $3 27,059, 000 for the Combined Sewer Over?ow Program; $6,154,000 for the Washington Aqueduct; $28,226,000 for the Stormwater Program; and $33,137,000 for the capital equipment program; in addition, $16,000,000 from funds previously appropriated in this Act under the heading ?Federal Payment to the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority?; provided, that the requirements and restrictions that are applicable to General Fund capital improvement projects and set forth in this Act under the Capital Outlay appropriation account shall apply to projects approved under this appropriation account. AQUEDUCT For operation of the Washington Aqueduct, 64,482,000 from enterprise and other funds. AND CHARITABLE GAMES ENTERPRISE FUND For the Lottery and Charitable Games Enterprise Fund, established by the District. of Columbia Appropriations Act, 1982, approved December 4, 1981 (Pub. L. No. 97-91,-, 95 Stat. 1 174), for the purpose of implementing the Law to Legalize Lotteries, Daily Numbers Games, and Bingo and Raffles for Charitable Purposes in the District of Columbia, effective March 10, 1981 (D.C. Law 3-122; codi?ed in scattered cites in the D.C. Official Code), $242,156,000 from enterprise and other funds; provided, that the District of Columbia shall identify the source of funding for this appropriation title from the District?s own locally generated revenues; provided 19 further, that no revenues? from Federal sources shall be used to support the operations or activities of the Lottery and Charitable Games Control Board; provided further, that, after noti?cation to the Mayor, amounts appropriated herein may be increased by an amount necessary for the Lottery and Charitable Games Enterprise Fund to make transfers to the General Fund of the District of Columbia and to cover prizes, agent commissions, and gaming related fees directly associated with unanticipated excess lottery revenues not included in this appropriation. DISTRICT or RETIREMENT BOARD For the District of Columbia Retirement Board, established pursuant to section 121 of the District of Columbia Retirement Reform Act of 1929, approved November 17, 1979 (93 Stat 866; DC. Official Code l-711), $30,133 3,000 from the earnings of the applicable retirement funds to pay legal, management, investment, and other fees and administrative expenses of the District of Columbia Retirement Board; provided, that the District of Columbia Retirement Board shall provide to Congress and to the Council of the District of Columbia a quarterly report of the allocations of charges by fund and of expenditures of all funds; provided further, that the District of Columbia Retirement Board shall provide to the Mayor, for transmittal to the Council of the Districtof Columbia, an itemized accounting of the planned use of appropriated funds in time for each annual budget submission and the actual use of such funds in time for each annual audited financial report. WASHINGTON CONVENTION CENTER ENTERPRISE FUND For the Washington. Convention Center Enterprise Fund, including for functions previously performed by the District of Columbia Sports and Entertainment Commission, $132,293,000 ?'om enterprise and other funds. Housmo FINANCE For the Housing Finance Agency, $9,662,000 from enterprise and other UNIVERSITY or THE DISTRICT or COLUMBIA For the University of the District of Columbia, $153,055,000 from enterprise and other funds. DISTRICT or COLUMBIA PUBLIC LIBRARY TRUST FUND For the District of Columbia-Public Library Trust Fund, $17,000 from enterprise and other ?mds. UNEMPLOYMENT CUMPENSATION TRUST FUND For the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund, $3 67,000,000 from enterprise and other funds. HOUSING PRODUCTION Tausr FUND For the Housing Production Trust Fund, $40,422,000 from enterprise and other funds; provided, that all funds deposited into the Housing Production Trust Fund are, without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain availableuntil expended. 20 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING For Tax Increment Financing, $60,413 9,000 from enterprise and other funds. BALLPARK REVENUE FUND For the Ballpark Revenue Fund, $68,800,000 from enterprise and other funds. REPAYMENT OF PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES FINANCING For Repayment of Payment in Lieu of Taxes Financing, $15,882,000 from enterprise and other funds. HOSPITAL CORPORATION For the Not-For?Pro?t Hospital Corporation, $112,000,000 from enterprise and other funds. HEALTH BENEFIT AUTHORITY For the District of Columbia Health Bene?t Exchange Authority, $28,751,000 from enterprise and Other funds. FLOW FUND All funds deposited into the Cash Flow Reserve Fund, established pursuant to D.C. Official Code 47692.02, are without regard to fiscal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended. FISCAL STABALIEATION RESERVE ACCOUNT FUND All funds deposited into the Fiscal Stabilization Reserve Account Fund, established pursuant to D.C. Official Code 47-39102, are without regard to ?scal year, authorized for expenditure and shall remain available until expended. CAPITAL OUTLAY For capital construction projects, an increase of $2,966,443,000, of which $2,613,l38,000 shall be from local funds, $74,288,000 from the Local Transportation Fund, $24,785,000 from the District of Columbia Highway Trust Fund, and 0,000 from Federal grant funds, and a rescission of $793,969,000, of which $723,098,000 is from local funds, $5,816,000 from the Local Transportation Fund, $24,751,000 from the District of Columbia Highway Trust Fund, and $40,3 04,000 from Federal grant funds appropriated under this heading in prior ?scal years, for a net amount of $2,172,-474,000; to remain available until expended; in addition, provided, that all funds provided by this appropriation title shall be available only for the speci?c projects and purposes intended, provided further, that amounts appropriated under this heading may be increased by the amount transferred from funds appropriated in this act as Pay-AS?You-Go Capital funds. TITLE IV--GENERAL PROVISIONS 21 SEC. 101. There are appropriated from the applicable ?mds of the District of Columbia such sums as may be necessary for malczing refunds and for the payment of legal settlements or judgments that have been entered against the District of Columbia government. SEC. 102. The District of Columbia may use local funds provided in the title to carry out lobbying activities on any matter. SEC. 103.The District of Columbia government is authorized to approve reprograrnming and transfer requests of local funds under this title through November 7, 2015. SEC. 104. (a)Amounts appropriated in this Act as operating funds may be transferred to the District of Columbia's enterprise and capital funds and such amounts, once transferred, shall retain appropriation authority consistent with the provisions of this Act. The District of Columbia government is authorized to reprogram or transfer for operating expenses any local funds transferred or reprogrammed in this or the four prior ?scal years from operating funds to capital funds, and such amounts, once transferred or reprogrammed, shall retain appropriation authority consistent with the provisions of this Act. The District of Columbia government may not transfer or reprogram for operating expenses any funds derived from bonds, notes, or other obligations issued for capital projects. SEC. 105. During fiscal year 2016, and for each succeeding ?scal year, during a period in which neither a District of Columbia continuing resolution or a regular District of Columbia appropriation bill is in effect, local ?ands are appropriated in the amount provided for -any project or activity for which local funds are provided in an enacted Budget Request Act as submitted to Congress (subject to any modifications enacted by the District of Columbia as of the beginning of the period during which this subsection is in effect) at the rate set forth by such Act. Appropriations made by subsection shall cease to be available? (1) during any period in which a District of Columbia continuing resolution is in effect; or (2) upon the enactment into law of the regular District of Coltunbia appropriation bill. An appropriation made by subsection is provided under the authority and conditions as provided under this Act and shall be available to the extent and in the manner that would be provided by this Act. An appropriation made by subsection shall cover all obligations or expenditures incurred for such project or activity during the portion of the ?scal year for which this section applies to such project or activity. This section shall not apply to a proj e.ct or activity during any period of the fiscal year if any other provision of law (other than an authorization of appropriations)- (1) makes an appropriation, makes funds available, or grants authority for such project or activity to continue for such period, or (2) speci?cally provides that no appropriation shall be made, no funds shall be made available, or no authority shall be granted for such project or activity to continue for such period. 22 (1) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect obligations of the government of the District of Columbia mandated by other law. This section shall not apply if section 202 of this Act has been enacted. If the Attorney General of the District of Columbia enters into a contract with private counsel for the provision of legal services in claims or other legal matters affecting the interests of the District of Columbia and the contract includes a contingency fee arrangement, the District of Columbia may make payments pursuant to such arrangement without regard to whether the funds used for the payments are deposited in accounts of the District of Columbia or provided in an appropriation, notwithstanding any provision of title 31, United States Code, the fourth sentence of section 446 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (D.C. Official Code, sec. I?204.4f5. The amount of the fee payable for legal services furnished under any such contract may not exceed the fee that counsel engaged in the private practice of law in the District of Columbia typically charges clients for furnishing similar legal services, as determined by the Attorney General of the District of Columbia. The District of Columbia may not enter into a contingency fee arrangement in a claim or other legal matter seeking the-recovery of Federal funds. In this section, a "contingency'fee arrangemen means a provision in a contract described in subsection under which the costs, expenses, and fees the private counsel charges for legal services are payable from the amount recovered. Sec. 10?. The District government shall not be required to include a moveable span in the replacement of the Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge unless the federal government provides the funding for the moveable span. Sec. 108. Except as expressly provided otherwise, any reference to "this Act" contained in this title or in title IV shall be treated as referring only to the provisions of this title or of title IV. This division may be cited as the ?District of C.olumbia Appropriations Act, 2015.? DIVISION DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AUTHORIZATION REQUEST BUDGET AN LEGISLATIVE AUTONOMY SEC. 201. Section 446 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 801; D.C. Official Code is amended as follows: Strike the third sentence and "insert the phrase ?The Mayor shall submit to the President of the United States for transmission to Congress the portion of the budget so adopted with respect to federal funds and the Mayor shall notify the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the President of the Senate, as to the portion of the budget so adopted with respect to local funds; provided, that in a control year (as defined in D.C. Official Code 47- 393 the Mayor shall submit to the President of the United States for transmission to Congress the budget so adopted." in its place. (13) Strike, in the ?fth sentence, the phrase ?the Mayor shall not transmit any annual budget or amendments or supplements thereto, to the President of the United States? and inserting the phrase ?the Mayor shall not submit to the President of the United States, or, for a fiscal year which is not a control year, notify the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate regarding, any annual budget or amendments or supplements thereto? in its place. SEC. 202. Subpart 1 of part of title IV of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (D.C. Official Code, sec. 1-204.-41 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 44613 the following new section: AND FISCAL YEAR AUTONOMY "Sec. 446C. BUDGET AUTONOMY.?Notwithstanding the fourth sentence of section 446 of the Home Rule Act (D.C. Official Code, the second and third sentences of section 44?? of the Home Rule Act (D.C. Official Code, sec. section 6U2(c) of the Home Rule Act (D.C. Official Code, or sections 816 and 317 of the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 2009 (D.C. Official Code, sees. 47- 369.01 and upon the enactment by the District of Columbia of the annual budget, or any alnendments or supplements thereto, for a fiscal year, officers and employees of the District of Columbia government may obligate and expend District of Columbia funds and hire employees in accordance with that budget. ISCAL YEAR AUTONOMY.?Notvvithstanding section 441 of the Home Rule Act (D.C. Of?ciai Code, sec. the fiscal year of the District government and any entity of the District government shall commence and end on such dates as may be established by the District of Columbia. EXCEPTION FOR CONTROL shall not apply in the case of any fiscal year that is a control year, as defined in section 305(4) of the District of Columbia Financial Responsibility and Management Assistance Act of 1995 (D.C. Official Code, sec. 47- 393 EFFECTIVE section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2015 and each succeeding fiscal year.". The table of contents of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 446B the following new item: (1) "Sec. 446C. Budget and ?scal year autonomy" SEC. 203. Legislative Autonomy. In Generai? Section 602. (sec. D.C-. Official Code) is amended by striking subsection Congressional Resolutions of Disapproval- (1) IN GENERAL The District of Columbia Home Rule Act is amended by striking section 604 (sec. D.C. Official Code). (2) CLERICAL The table of contents is amended by striking the item relating to section 604. (3.) EXERCISE OF RULEMAKI-NO POWER- This subsection and the amendments 24 made by this subsection are enacted by Congress?? (A) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the House of Representatives and the Senate, respectively, and as such they shall be considered as a part of the rules of each House, respectively, or of that House to which they speci?cally apply, and such rules shall supersede other rules only to? the extent that they are inconsistent therewith; and (B) with full recognition of the constitutional right of either House to change such rules (so far as relating to such House) at any time, in the same manner, and to the same extent as in the case of any other rule of such House. Conforming Amendments- DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOME RULE ACT- (A) Section 303 (sec. D.C. Official Code) is a_mcnded?- in subsection by striking the second sentence; and (ii) by striking subsection and redesignating subsections and as subsections and (3) Section 4U4(e) (sec. Official Code) is amended by striking ?subject to the provisions of section each place it appears. (C) Section 462 (sec. 14204.62, D.C. Official Code) is amended?? in subsection by striking The Council? and inserting ?The Council?; and (ii) by striking subsections and (D) Section 472(d) (sec. D.C. Official Code) is amended to read as follows: Payments Not Subject to Appropriation? The fourth sentence of section 446 shall not apply to any amount obligated or expended by the District for the payment of the principal of, interest on, or redemption premium for any revenue anticipation note issued under subsection (E) Section 47'5(e) (sec. D.C. Officiai Code) is amended to read as follows: Payments Not Subject to Appropria-tion? The fourth sentence of section 446 shall not apply to any amount obligated or expended by the District for the payment of the principal of, interest on, or redemption premium for any revenue anticipation note issued under this section.?. (2) OTHER LAWS- (A) Section of Amendment No. 1 (relating to initiative and referendum) to title IV (the District Charter) (sec. D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ?the appropriate custodian? and all that follows through ?portion of such act to?. (13) Section 5 of Amendment No. 1 (relating to initiative and referendum) to title IV (the District Charter) (sec. 1-204.105, D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking and such act? and all that follows and inserting a period. (C) Section 16 of the District of Columbia Election Code of 1955 (see. l-1001.16, D.C. Official Code)-- in subsection (I) by striking ?sections 404 and 6U2(c)? and inserting ?section 404?, and (II) by striking the second sentence; and (ii) in subsection (I) in the first sentence, by striking ?the appropriate custodian? and all that 25 follows through ?parts of such act to?, (II) by striking ?is held. If, however, after? and inserting ?is held unless, under? and by striking ?section, the act which? and all that follows and inserting ?section?. Effective Date. The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to each act of the District of Columbia- (1) passed by the Council of the District of Columbia and signed by the Mayor of the District of Columbia; (2) vetoed by the Mayor and repassed by the Council; (3) passed by the Council and allowed to become effective by the Mayor without the Mayor?s signature; or (4) in the case of initiated acts and acts subject to referendum, ratified by a majority of the registered quali?ed electors voting on the initiative or referendum, on or after October 1, 2013. This division may be cited as the ?District of Columbia Budget and Legislative Autonomy Act, 2015?. DIVISION - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AUTHORIZATION REQUEST OMNIBUS PROVISIONS SEC. 301. Sections lU7(b) and 109 of the District of Columbia Financial Responsibility and Management Assistance Act of 1995, approved April 17, 1995 (109 Stat. 136; D.C. Official Code and are repealed. Sec. 302. The Attorney General for the District of Columbia Clari?cation and Elected Term Amendment Act of 2010, effective May 27, 2009 (DC. Law 18-160; D.C. Official Code 1601.81 et seq.) is amended by adding a Section 106a to read as follows: ?Sec. 106a. Contingency fee contracts The Attorney General may make contracts retaining private counsel to furnish legal services, including representation in negotiation, compromise, settlement, and litigation, in claims and other legal matters affecting the interests of the District of Colunibia. Each contract shall include such terms and conditions as the Attorney General considers necessary or appropriate, including a provision specifying the amount of any fee to be paid to the private counsel under the contract or the method for calculating that fee. The amount of the fee payable for legal services furnished under any such contract shall not exceed the fee that counsel engaged in the private practice of law in the District typically charges clients for furnishing similar legal services, as determined by the Attorney General. Notwithstanding any provision of federal or District of Columbia law, a contract entered into by the District of Columbia pursuant to thissection may provide that costs, expenses, and fees that the private counsel charges for legal services are payable from the amount recovered. In such circumstances, the costs, expenses, and fees need not be included in an amount provided in an appropriations law.? 26 SEC. 303. Congressional Review Streamlining. Section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking the phrase. ?(excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and hoiidays, and any day on which neither House is in session because of an adjournment s_ine die, a recess of more than 3 days, or an adjournment of more than three days)?? The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to-each act of the District" of Columbia? (1) passed by the Council of the District of Columbia and signed by the Mayor of the District of Columbia; (2) vetoed by the Mayor and repassed by the Council; or (3) passed by the Council and allowed to become effective without the Mayor's signature, on or after the effective date of this section. SEC. 304. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Saint Elizabeths Hospital and District of Columbia Mental Health Services Act (P.L. 93-621; 42 U.S.C. 225 et seq), the District may use the property transferred to the District pursuant to the Act for any purposes as may be determined by the District, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall amend the deed whereby the property was transferred to the District to eliminate all conditions or restrictions on the use of the property.? SEC. 305. Notwithstanding any other provision of law or other requirement: (1) With respect to the urban renewal program, any urban renewal plans or projects, and any property acquired under the urban renewal program, the District of Columbia shall no longer have any obligations (including, but not limited to, obligations related to the treatment of income from the lease, use, or disposition of urban renewal properties as community development block grant progarn income (including such lease, use, -and disposition income received by the District prior to the effective date of this section), obligations related to payments to the Department of Housing and Urban Development and obligations related to recordkeeping and accounting), including obligations pursuant to: (A) Previous agreements with (including the District of Columbia Urban Renewal Closeout agreements); (B) I-IUD regulations (including urban renewal and CDBG regulations); and (C) The terms of any previous loans, grants, or other financial assistance provided by HUD to the District, the Redevelopment Land Agency or any other entity of the District government; (2) With respect to any property acquired pursuant to the urban renewal program or otherwise acquired with the proceeds of an urban renewal grant, loan, or other form of financial assistance that remains -in the ownership or jurisdiction of the District, or any entity of the District, the District, or the entity of the District, may dispose of or lease the property for any purpose the District, or the entity of the District, considers appropriate, and no prior requirements imposed on the disposition or lease of the property by regulation, by prior agreement with HUD (including the District of Columbia Urban Renewal Closeout Agreements), by an urban renewal plan, or by any other prior agreement between HUD and the District, RLA, or any other entity of the District shall apply; (3) With respect to any income received from the lease, use, or disposition of -a 27 property acquired pursuant to the urban renewal program or otherwise acquired with the proceeds of an urban renewal grant, loan, or other form of ?nancial assistance, which income remains in the possession or control of the District, or any entity of the District, the District, or -entity of the District, may expend. such income for any purpose the District, or entity of the District, considers appropriate, and no requirement imposed on the income by regulation, by prior agreement (including the District of Columbia Urban Renewal Closeout Agreements) between HUD and the District, RLA, or any entity of the District, or by an urban renewal plan, shall apply; (4) The urban renewal plans for the District of Columbia urban renewal areas, including 14th Street, Columbia Plaza, Downtown, Port Lincoln, Street, Northeast No. 1, Northwest No. 1, Shaw School, Southwest B, Southwest C, and Southwest C-1, shall no longer be of any force or effect. For the purposes of this section, the term ?District of Columbia Urban Renewal Closeout Agreements? means closeout agreements between HUD and the District, RLA, or any entity of the District with respect to the urban renewal projects (including but not limited to all neighborhood development programs) of the District of Columbia, including but not limited to the following: 14th Street Urban Renewal Project, Columbia Plaza Urban Renewal Project, Downtown Urban Renewal Project, Fort Linco.ln Urban Renewal Project, Street Urban Renewal Project, Northeast No. 1 Urban Renewal Project, Northwest No. 1 Urban Renewal Project, Shaw School Urban Renewal Project, Southwest Urban Renewal Project, Southwest Urban Renewal. Project, and Southwest C-1 Urban Renewal Project. SEC. 306.. Within 90 days after the effective date of this section, the director of each federal agency with jurisdiction over the following properties in the District of Columbia shall transfer all right, title, and interest of the United States in each property to the government of the District of Columbia. If urisdiction over a property is held by the District of Columbia, the District of Columbia may execute a quitclaim deed on behalf of the United States to transfer all right, title, and interest of the United States in the property to the government of the District of Columbia: (1) Square 2558, Lot 0810 (a portion of the Marie H. Reed Community Learning Center, a District of Columbia Public School); (2) Square 2901, Lot 0816 (Raymond Recreation Center, a portion of the. Raymond Elementary School campus); (3) Square 2901, Lot 0815 (a portion of the Raymond Elementary School campus); (4) Square 03 64, Lot 0837 (a portion of the Shaw Junior High School campus); (5) Parcel 246, Lot 0051 (RR. Harris School); (6) Square 2864, Lot 0830 (Meyer Elementary School, closed); (2) Square 3327, Lot 0800 (Rudolph Elementary, closed); (3) Square 051 1, Lot 0822 (?elds and parking of Bundy School, closed); (9) Square 0767, Lot 0829 (Canal Park, north parcel); (10) Square 0269, Lot 0821 (Canal Park, south parcel); (1 1) Square 0768, Lot 0810 (Canal Park, center parcel); (12) Square 2882, Lot 0936 (Bannelter Senior High School campus, western portion); (1 3) Square 2880, Lot 0359 (Banneker Senior High School, eastern portion); 28 (14) Square 0336, Lot 0828 (Shaw Jr. High School recreation ?elds); (15) Square 0593, "Lot 0823 (portion of Bowen Elementary School campus); (16) Square 0593, Lot 0822 (portion of Bowen Elementary School campus); (17) Square 0595, Lot 0810 (portion of Bowen Elementary School campus); (18) Square 0593, Lot 0326 (portion of Bowen Elementary School campus); (19) Square 0595, Lot 080'? (portion of Bowen Elementary School campus); (20) Square 0647, Lot 0802 (portion of Bowen Elementary School campus); (21) Square 0595, Lot 0309 (portion of Bowen Elementary School campus); (22) Square 0645, Lot 0816 (portion of Bowen Elementary School campus); (23) Square 0650N, Lot 0808 (portion of Bowen Elementary School campus); (24) Square 0647, Lot 0803 (portion of Bowen Elementary School campus); (25) Square O6-45W, Lot 0808 (portion of Bowen Elementary School campus); (26) Square 0593, Lot 0050 (portion of Bowen Elementary School campus); Square 0593, Lot 0051 (portion of Bowen Elementary School campus); (23) Square 0542, Lot 0085 (Southwest Library site); (29) All of Reservation 542 between Albernarle Street, N.W., and Chesapeake Street, N.W., including Lots 800 and 801 in Square 1772 and Lot 0807 in Square 1768, and Fort Drive, N.W. in Reservation 542 (Wilson Senior High School and Wilson Aquatic Center); (30) The northern corner portion of Reservation 470 containing approximately 31 ,Ell}0 square feet, abutting both the east property line of Lot 0311 in Square 1759 and Fessenden Street, N.W. (Deal Middle School); (31) Howard Street, NEW. in Reservation 470 (Deal Middle School); (32) Fort Drive, N.W. in Reservation 515 (Deal Middle School); (33) All of Reservation 519 in Square 5876 and Square 5884, including Lot 940 in Square 5326 (Johnson Middle School); (34) The play ?eld portion of Reservation 360 in Square 23 (Francis Middle School); (35) Square 2673, Lot 890 (offices of the District of Columbia Department of Parks and Recreation); (36) Square 5362, Lots 0135, 0954, and 0958 (Barry Farm New Communities Initiative); All of Reservation 487, including Square 5556, Lots 323 and 824, and Square 5560, Lots 314 and Lot 315 Avenue and Minnesota Avenue redevelopment); (38) All of Reservation 8, including all improvements thereon, which is bounded on the north by Mount Vernon Place, N.W., on the south by Street, N.W., on the west by 9th Street, N.W., and on the east by "Th Street, N.W. (Carnegie Library); (39) Reservation 343 F, Areas A, B, and (RF Stadium); and (40) Parcel 121:? I 5 and Parcel 121;? 16 (intersection of North Capitol and Irving Streets.) SEC. 307. Section 11201 of the National Capital Revitalization and Self?Government Improvement Act of 199?, approved August 5, 1997 (11 I Stat. 734; DC. Of?cia1Code 24? 101), is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: Reimbursement to District of Columbia Department of Corrections The United States Government shall reimburse the District of Columbia Department of Corrections its costs 29 of providing custody and care for: Felons committed by the Superior Court of the District of Columbia from the date of sentencing until transfer to a penal or correctional facility operated or contracted for by the Bureau of Prisons; Previously sentenced felons committed to the Department of Corrections as violators of parole, supervised release, or probation from the date of commitment until transfer to a penal or correctional facility operated or contracted for by the Bureau of Prisons; and Previously sentenced felons held by or committed to the Department of Corrections on writs from the date of commitment until transfer to a penal or correctional facility operated or contracted for by the Bureau of Prisons.? SEC. 303. Any interest accumulated on the funds that the District of Columbia received pursuant to the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 2000, approved November 29, 1999 (113 Stat. 1501;, Pub. L. No. 106-1 13), under the heading ?Federal Payment for the incentives for Adoption of Children? and for the establishment of a scholarship fund for District of Columbia children without parents due to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack under this same heading, pursuant to the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 2001, approved December 21, 2001 (115 Stat. 923; Pub. L. No. 107-96), shall be available to the District of Columbia until expended. SEC. 309. IN District of Columbia is authorized to renew or enter into-a new Interstate Compact for Juveniles for the purposes of placing youth in appropriate therapeutic settings and providing and receiving supervision for youth in otherjurisdictions. (2) compact for juveniles that the Council of the District of Columbia ?authorizes the Mayor to execute on behaifof the District may contain provisions that delegate the requisite power and authority to the Interstate Commission for Juveniles to achieve the purposes for which the interstate compact is established. Section 406 of An Act to reorganize the courts of the District of Coiumbia, to revise the procedures for juveniles in the District of Columbia, to codify title 23 of the District of Columbia Code, and for other purposes, approved July 29., 1970 (34 Stat. 673; D.C. Official Code 24-1106), is repealed. SEC. 310. Section 103 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 77?; D.C. Official Code is amended by adding a new paragraph (16) to read as follows: The term ?Attomey General? means the Attorney General for the District of Columbia provided for part of title SEC. 311. Section 42413 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 774; DC. Official Code is amended by striking the phrase ?Procurement Practices Act of 1986? and inserting the phrase ?Procurement Practices Reform Act of 2010? in its place. SEC. 312. Sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Domestic Partnership Police and Fire Amendment Act of 2008, effective January 16, 2008 (DC. Act 17-278; 55 DCR 1530), are enacted into law. 30 SEC. 313. The following provi-so under the heading ?Lottery and Charitable Games Enterprise Fund? in the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 1982, approved December 4, 1931 (Pub. L. No. 97-91; 95 Stat. 1174,), is repealed: ?Provided further, that the advertising, sale, operation, or playing of the lotteries, raffles, bingos, or other games authorized by D.C. Law 3-172 is prohibited on the Federal enclave, and in adjacent public buildings and land controlled by the Shipstead-Luce Act as amended by 53 Stat. 1144, as well as in the Old Georgetown Historic District? SEC. 314. Notwithstanding any other law, the following sales shall be subject to the sales and use taxes of the District of Columbia: (1) Sales at gift shops, souvenir shops, kiosks, convenience stores, food shops, cafeterias, restaurants, and similar establishments in federal buildings, including, but not limited to, memorials and museums, in the District of Columbia that make sales to: (A) The general public, whether_operated by the federal government, an agent of the federal government, or a contractor; and (B) Other than the general public, if operated by an agent of the federal government or a contractor; and (2) Sales of goods and services by government-sponsored enterprises and corporations, institutions, and organizations established by federal. statute or regulation (collectively, ?federal enterprises and organizations?), including, but not limited to, the Smithsonian Institution, National Gallery of Art, National Building Museum, Federal National Mortgage Association, and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, if the federal enterprise or organization is otherwise exempt from such taxation, to the extent such sales would otherwise be subject to the sales and use taxes of the District of Columbia if the federal enterprise or organization were organized as a nonpro?t corporation established pursuant to Chapter 4 of Title 29 of the District of Columbia Official Code, and exempt from federal income taxation pursuant to section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, approved October 22, 1986 (100 Stat. 2085; 26 U.S.C. SEC. 315. Section 435 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 19773 (87 Stat. 807; DC. Official Code is amended to read as follows: 485- Except for estate, inheritance, and gift taxes, Bonds and notes issued by the District pursuant to this title and the interest thereon shall be exempt from all District, State, and Federal taxation, including from taxation by any county, municipality, or other political subdivision of a State and any Territory or possession of the United States?. SEC. 316. Section 6U2(a)(5) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved on December 24, I973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code is amended by striking the phrase ?of the District? the first time it appears and insert-ing the phrase ?of the District, unless his or her source of income derives from District local funds? in its place. SEC. 317. Section 6D2(a)(5) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act,_ approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; DC. Official Code is amended by striking the phrase ?of any individual not a resident of the District? and inserting the phrase ?of any individual not a resident of the District, except professional athletes,? in its place. SEC. 318. The Recreation Act of 1994, effective March 23, I995 (D.C. Law 10-246; D..C. Official Code 10-301 ea? seq), is amended by adding a new section 6a to read as follows: ?Sec. 6a. Food and refreshments.?Notwithstanding any other provision of law or other requirement, the Department may use appropriated ?inding, including funds in the Recreation Enterprise Fund, to provide food, snacks, meals, refreshments, and non-alcoholic beverages to the general public, program participants, and District government employees in connection with sporting, educational, or other recreational programs or events the Department sponsorsf?. Section is repealed. SEC. 319. Section 1 108 of the District of Columbia Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978, effective March 3, 1979 (13.0. Law 2-139; D.C. Official Code 1- 61 1.03) is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: Notwithstanding any other law, the District may use appropriated funds to provide meals and refreshments to members of boards and commissions. Meals and refreshments may be provided during meetings in which members are actively engaged in public business for signi?cant periods of time, and where the provision of food would contribute to the effective conduct of the meeting and the accomplishment of the obj ectivcs. The Mayor shall issue rules to specify the types of boards and commissions to which food may be provided, the nature of the meetings to which this subsection shall apply, any advance approvals that may be required, the maximum amou_nts that may be spent, and any other applicable restrictions?. This division may be cited as the ?District of Columbia Omnibus Authorization Act, 2015?. See. 3. Effective date. This act shall take effect as provided in section 446 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (37 Stat. 801; DC. Official Code 32 GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUIVIBIA Oflice of the Attorney General at ?air Legal Counsel Division i T0: Lolita S. Alston Director Office of Le?lative Support FROM: Janet M. Robins Deputy Attorney General Legal Counsel Division earn: April 3, 21114 SUBJECT: Legal Certi?cation of Draft Bill, the ?Fiscal 2015 Budget Request Act of 2014? This i5 120 that this Of?ee has reviewed the above-referenced draft legislation and found it, as to form and format only, to be legally au?ieient. If you have any questions in this regard, please do not hesitate to call me at 724-5524. 1350 Pennsjivania Avenue, N.W., Suite 409, ?Washington, D.C. 2tlElE}4 Phone (202) 724-5524 Fax (202) 724-6160 OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL Council of the District of Columbia 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 4 Washington, DC 20004 (202) 724-8026 MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman Phil Mendelson FROM: V. David Zvenyach, General Counsel DATE: May 27, 2014 RE: Legal sufficiency determination for the committee print of Bill 20-749, Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Request Act of 2014 $FSUJGJFE CZ 7 %BWJE ;WFOZBDI (FOFSBM $PVOTFM $PVODJM PG UIF %JTUSJDU PG $PMVNCJB The measure is legally and technically sufficient for Council consideration. I have reviewed the proposed Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Request Act of 2014 committee print and find it to be legally unobjectionable, with leave to make conforming and technical amendments. I am available if you have any questions. VDZ