IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO. 5:13-CV-585 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) $98,699.60 IN U. S. CURRENCY, ) ) Defendant. ) COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM The United States of America, by the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina, states as follows: 1. This is a civil action in rem brought to enforce the provision of 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) for the forfeiture of United States currency which was used or intended to be used in exchange for controlled substances or represents proceeds of trafficking in controlled substances or was used or intended to be used to facilitate a violation of Title II of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801 et seq. 2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter by virtue of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345 and 1355(a). The Court has in rem jurisdiction by virtue of 28 U.S.C. § 1355(b). Venue in this district is proper by virtue of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1395(b). 1 Case 5:13-cv-00585-D Document 1 Filed 08/15/13 Page 1 of 4 3. The defendant is $98,699.60 in United States currency. The known potential claimant as to this currency is Kenneth Lamont Clark. 4. The defendant was seized in Harnett County, North Carolina and is currently located in the Seized Asset Deposit Fund Account maintained by the United States Marshal for the Eastern District of North Carolina, within the jurisdiction of this Court. 5. The facts and circumstances supporting the seizure and forfeiture of the defendant are contained in Exhibit A, Declaration of Task Force Agent Michael E. Williams, Jr. of the U. S. Drug Enforcement Administration, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Such facts constitute probable cause for the forfeiture of the defendant property. 6. The defendant was used, or intended to be used, in exchange for controlled substances, or represents proceeds of trafficking in controlled substances or was used or intended to be used to facilitate a violation of Title II of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq., and is therefore subject to forfeiture to the United States of America pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). WHEREFORE, in accordance with Supplemental Rule G(3)(b)(i), the plaintiff requests that the Clerk issue a warrant of arrest 2 Case 5:13-cv-00585-D Document 1 Filed 08/15/13 Page 2 of 4 in rem for the defendant; that due notice be given to all parties to appear and show cause why the forfeiture should not be decreed; that judgment be entered declaring the defendant be forfeited to the United States of America for disposition according to law; and that the United States of America be granted such other relief as this Court may deem just and proper, together with the costs and disbursements of this action. Respectfully submitted this 15th day of August, 2013. THOMAS G. WALKER United States Attorney BY: /s/ Joshua B. Royster JOSHUA B. ROYSTER Attorney for Plaintiff Assistant United States Attorney Civil Division 3l0 New Bern Avenue Suite 800 Federal Building Raleigh, NC 2760l-l46l Telephone: (9l9) 856-4530 Facsimile: (919)856-4821 Email: Joshua.royster@usdoj.gov N. C. Bar No. 28785 3 Case 5:13-cv-00585-D Document 1 Filed 08/15/13 Page 3 of 4 VERIFICATION I, Joshua B. Royster, Assistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina, declare under penalty of perjury, as provided by 28 U.S.C. Section 1746, the following: That the foregoing Complaint for Forfeiture is based on reports and information furnished to me by Task Force Agent Michael E. Williams, Jr. of the U. S. Drug Enforcement Administration, and to the best of my information and belief, is true and correct. This the 15th day of August, 2013. /s/ Joshua B. Royster JOSHUA B. ROYSTER Assistant United States Attorney Civil Division 4 Case 5:13-cv-00585-D Document 1 Filed 08/15/13 Page 4 of 4