State of California Environrnental Protection Agency Departrnent of Toxic Substances Control SAMPLING AND INSPECTION REPORT I. GENERAL INFORMATION Company Name: Exide Technologies, Inc. Facility Address: 2700 South Indiana Avenue Los Angeles, Califomia 90058 Telephone Number: (323) 262-1101 ext.259 EPA 10 Number: CAD 097854541 Facility Type: Off-Site Hazardous Waste Storage and Treatment Facility Regulated Units: The facility operates the following hazardous waste management units under an ISO: The Reverberatory and Blast Smelting fumaces and the ancillary equipment; the Containment Building; the Waste Water Treatment Plant; and six Spent Lead-Acid Battery and Lead Hazardous Waste storage areas. Permit Status: Interim Status Document (ISO) Inspected by: Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS Brian Wu, HSS Date of Sampling Inspection: January 6,2011 and March 7, 2011 Dafe$cWConiprehensive .... '-,. Evaluation Inspection: February 28, 2011 and March 2, 3, and 7, 2011 Type of Inspection: Comprehensive Evaluation and Sampling Inspections Facility Representatives: Ed Mopas, Environmental Manager Pat Curran, Process Engineer Felipe Sandoval, Bag House Supervisor Galindo Felix, Waste Water Treatment Unit Supervisor Vianey Mendez, Health and Safety Manager. II. CONSENT Consent to conduct an inspection that involves: taking photographs, reviewing and copying records, questioning personnel and inspecting hazardous waste management areas. Consent given by: Ed Mopas on January 6,2011, February 28,2011 and March 2, 3, and 7, 2011 III. a. DOCUMENTS REVIEWED Manifests, Bills of Lading, LDR's, Exception Reports: No violations were found during the review of the manifests or bills of lading. No Exception Reports were filed since the last inspection. b. Contingency Plan: No violations were found during the review of the Contingency Plan. c. Training Plan and Records: No violations were found during the review of the Training plan or Training records. However, the training plan needs to be organized to clearly show that employees who are directly involved in the management of hazardous waste are receiving the required hazardous waste training. d. Incident Report: No reportable incidents occurred in the past year. e. Waste Analysis Plan and Records: No violations were found during the review of the Waste Analysis Plan. f. Operation Log: No violations were found during the review of the Operation Log. g. Inspection Records: No violations were found during the review of the Inspection Records. h. Ti,ered Permitting Applications and Authorization Letters: N/A I. Annual/Biennial Reports: No violations were found during the review of the Annual Report. j. SB 14 Plans: Exide Technologies is a recycling facility. k. Closure Cost Estimates and Updates: No violations cited. I. Part A: An application was filed in 1981 by Gould, Inc., the former owner of GNB. Exide purchased GNB in 2000, and the facility currently operates under the name Exide Technologies. The facility was never issued a Hazardous Waste Facility permit and is currently operating under Interim Status Document. m. Part B: The Part B application is under review with the Southern California Permitting and Corrective Action Branch. n. POTW Compliance Data: Exide operates a Waste Water Treatment unit that discharges waste water into the POTW. o. Tank and/or Containment Certifications: No violations were found during the review of the Tank and lor Containment Certifications. p. Air Board Permits: Several of the facility's hazardous waste management units are equipped with Air Monitoring Control Devices. All permits for these devices are current. q. Variances: N/A r. Recycling Records: N/A s. Other:. N/A IV. NARRATIVE OF OBSERVATIONS/DISCUSSION WITH OPERATOR On February 28, 2011, I, Ruth Williams-Morehead and Brian Wu began an annual Comprehensive Evaluation Inspection (CEI) at Exide Technologies (Facility). We met with Mr. Ed Mopas, Environmental Manager. However prior to this inspection, on January 6,2011, Brian Wu and I conducted a sampling inspection at Exide. During this inspection we collected 6 water samples to determine if the water that flows into, is stored in, and is pumped out of the Storm Water Retention pond (Pond) is hazardous. On January 6 2011, the Pond was almost full to its capacity of 3.3-3.6 million gallons of water. One water sample was collected from the inlet valve that brings water from the Pond into the West Equalization tank (attachment 1, photo 1), one water sample was collected from the inlet' valves that bring water from the Dropout Boxes into the Pond (attachment 1, photos 2-4), and one water sample was collected from the Centralized Collection sump (attachment 1 photos 5-6) The water from the Centralized Collection sump flows into the Dropout Boxes The last three water samples were collected directly from the Pond (attachment 1, photo 7). All six samples were analyzed and the results showed that the samples were non-hazardous (attachment 2). On March 7, 2011, six samples were collected from the Pond (attachment 1, (photos 25-28). The water level in the Pond was very low and I could see sludge on the bottom of the Pond. All six samples were collected from Pond and were analyzed.' The result-of the-analytical showed that all six samples are non" hazardous (attachment 3). During the CEI, I asked Mr. Mopas Ifthere were any changes in the Facility's Operation since my last inspection and Mr. Mopas stated, "No". We concluded the opening interview and began the inspection of the facility's Hazardous Waste Management Units and other Hazardous Waste Areas. A. Hazardous Waste Management Units and other Hazardous Waste Areas: Reverberatory and Blast Furnaces and Containment Building: The furnaces are used to recover lead frorn lead acid batteries and other lead containing rnaterial and hazardous waste. Spent batteries are crushed in the battery wrecker and the material generated from crushing the batteries is stored in the containment building. The material is fed into the Reverberatory Furnace to recover the lead. Primary slag is generated as a byproduct in the Reverberatory Furnace and contains a high percentage of lead. The primary slag as well as other lead material and lead hazardous waste are also placed into the Blast Furnace to recover lead. A secondary slag is generated from the Blast Furnace, and is sent-off site for disposal. The Containment Building operates under negative pressure and appeared to be intact. No releases were observed. Waste Water Treatment Plant: Hazardous waste water that is generated on-site is treated at the Waste Water Treatment Plant before it is discharged into the Los Angeles County Sanitation District. The hazardous waste water is contaminated with battery acid, lead and other heavy rnetals. The hazardous waste water is generated from the smelting operation, the wash down of the facility and from rainwater that is collected in the Storm Water Retention Pond. During the walk-through of the Waste Water Treatment Plant, I observed that a tank had been removed (attachment 1, photos 8 -9). Mr. Mopas stated that hazardous waste acid tank T -63 was removed due to leaks and will be replaced with an equivalent tank. Subsequent to the inspection Mr. Mopas e-rnailed me a work summary of the decontamination and demolition of tank T-63 (attachment 4). The facility took samples of tank T-63 and Mr. Mopas attached a copy of the analytical report of the samples to his e-mail. I did not observe any spills or leaks coming from the tanks or tank ancillary equipment. The coating covering the floor of the secondary containment, and the . wall surrounding the Waste Water Treatmentplant were-intact;Trailer Staging Area: The trailer staging area is used to stage incoming and outgoing hazardous waste on the transport vehicle for no more than ten days. During the walk-through of the area I noticed several 40 foot trailers staged in this area. The trailers contained either hazardous waste contaminated with lead or spent lead acid batteries. The trailers which contained the spent lead acid batteries were marked with a label that contained the date the trailers arrived at the facility. The trailers that contained hazardous waste plastic were marked with a hazardous waste label that contained the start date of accumulation and the other required information. All of the trailers in the area were closed. I did not notice any leaks coming from trailers, or any spills. Storm Water Retention Pond: (Pond) The Storm Water Retention Pond is used to collect rainwater run-off and hazardous waste water that is generated from washing down the facility (attachment 1, photos 10-13). The Pond also receives hazardous waste water from four 9,000 gallon Dropout Boxes that receive hazardous waste from the Centralized sump. Water generated from washing down the facility and other sources is collected in the Centralized sump and pumped into the Dropout Boxes, which filter out dirt, rock and other debris before the water is pumped into the Pond. Hazardous Waste Battery Storage Area: Bins 103-108 Numerous pallets of batteries were stored in Hazardous Waste Storage Area 103105, and 108. Hazardous Waste Storage Area 106 and 107 were empty (attachment 1, photos 14-18). Each pallet of batteries was marked with a label that contained the date the batteries were received from off-site. The pallets and batteries were intact and I did not observed any leaks or spills. The pallets were wrapped with plastic to enclose the batteries and to keep the pallets intact. West Yard: The facility is prohibited from storing hazardous waste in the West Yard. The facility uses the West Yard to store equipment. During the walk-through, I observed that there were only empty trailers and equipment stored on the West Yard. Railcar Spur: The facility operates a rail spur that is used to transport finished product (recycled lead) to various customer. During the walk-through of this area there were four rail cars parked on the spur that contained recycled lead. Adjacent to the rail spur is a loading dock.l-observed-46-drl:lms-on-thedock(attachmenH-;phetes -19·24). - 1also observed that 30 of the drums contained hazardous waste lead dross. The drums were brought to the facility by truck and off-loaded on the dock. I informed Mr. Mopas that hazardous waste received from off-site has to be stored in an authorized unit. I told him that the loading dock is not an authorized unit, and that the 30 drums of hazardous waste lead dross were stored in an unauthorized location. Mr. Mopas stated that the hazardous waste lead dross was received at the facility this morning, February 28,2011, and that the drums would be removed from the dock as soon as possible. Mr. Felix Galindo provided me with a copy of the manifest that accompanied the hazardous waste lead dross, which showed that the lead dross was received on February 28, 2011 (attachment 5). Mr. Galindo also gave me copies of the shipping document that will accompany the four rail cars (attachment 6). On March 7, 2011, I re-inspected the loading dock and the drums of hazardous waste lead dross were removed (attachment 1, photos 29-30). After we concluded the inspection of the rail spur, I concluded the inspection for the day. B. Record Review I, Ruth Williams-Morehead and Brian Wu returned to the facility on March 2, 3, and 7,2011 to conduct the record review. Mr. Mopas gave us consent on all three days to continue the inspection. During the record review we did not find any violations. V. VIOLATIONS: Violation Cited in the Summary of Violations issued on March 7, 2011 1. Health and Safety code, section 25202 Exide (the facility) violated Health and Safety Code, section 25202 on or about February 28,2011, to wit: the facility illegally stored 30 drums of hazardous waste lead dross they received from off-site in an unauthorized area. The facility stored 30 drums of hazardous waste lead dross on the loading dock next to the rail spur. Corrective Action: The facility representative gave me a copy of the manifest that accompanied the 30 drums of lead dross. The manifest showed that the facility received the 30 drums of hazardous waste lead dross on the morning of February 28, 2011 prior to my arrival to conduct the inspection. Before we left the area, facility personnel began removing the 30 drums of lead dross from the loading dock into the containment building . . On March 7, 2011, -I revisited the loading dock-and theeirumswereremoveel.The area was empty. Additional Violations: 2. Health and Safety Code, section 25202 The facility violated Health and Safety Code section 25202, in that on or about February 28,2011, March 2, 3, and 7, 2011, the facility illegally stored hazardous waste lead contaminated sludge in an unauthorized unit, to wit: During the facility walk-through, I observed hazardous waste sludge stored in the Storm Water Retention Pond. Corrective Action: This is a recurring violation and is currently being addressed in Enforcement Order HWCA 2009-2208. 3. California Code of Regulations, title 22, section 66265.193 subdivision c (4) and Consent Order HWCA 97/98-3021 The facility violated California Code of Regulations, title 22, section 66265.193 subdivision c (4) and Consent Order HWCA 97/98-3021, in that on or about February 28, March 2, 3, and 7, 2011, the facility failed to remove sludge from the Storm Water Retention within 24 hours or in as timely a manner as possible, to wit: During the facility walk-through, I observed hazardous waste sludge stored in the Storm Water Retention Pond. Corrective Action: This is a recurring violation and is currently being addressed in Enforcement Order HWCA 2009-2208. VI. CONCLUSION: We concluded the inspection on March 7, 2011, and had an exit interview with Mr. Mopas. During the exit interview we discuss the above violation and I also issued Mr. Mopas a Summary of Violation citing the violation (attachment 7). I also informed Mr. Mopas that I believed that Exide was required to notify DTSC prior to removing hazardous waste acid tank (TK-63), even if they are currently operating under an ISO. I told him that I thought that removing the tank required a Class I modification. However, I told him that I needed to discuss this issue with the Permitting and Corrective Action Branch to determine if removing the tank without prior notification is a violation. We concluded the inspection after this discussion and left the facility. Subsequent to the inspection, I determined that based on California Code of Regulationssection-6627'O: 72;Changesd uring InterimStattis-that-thefaeilityeJ id-n0t have to give the Department prior notification before removing waste acid tank TK63. VII. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Photos. 2. Split Sample Receipt, Sample Analysis Request form and Analytical Results for the water samples collected on January 6, 2011. 3. Split Sample Receipt, Sample Analysis Request form and Analytical Results for the water samples collected on March 7, 2011. 4. E-mail from Mr. Ed Mopas summarizing the decontamination and demolition of tank 63, and a copy of the analytical receipt for the tank samples. 5. Manifest which accompanied the 30 drums of hazardous waste lead dross that was received from off-site and stored on the loading dock adjacent to the rail spur. 6. Four separate Notice of Shipment and Bill of Lading for each of the four rail cars parked on the rail spur. The rail cars contain finished product (soft lead) that was sold to and will be shipped to East Penn Manufacturing. 7. Summary of Violations dated March 7, 2011. 11/~~'/ ~ Attachment 1 Exide Exide personnel collecting water sample RW-EX01062011-1A from the inlet valve Storm Water Retention Pond into the West Equalization Tank. 1 Exide January 6} 2011 The northeast end of the Storm Water Retention Pond. The photo the Dropout Boxes into the pond. 2 Exide I I Januar_6,2011 ~ o "'C OJ V> 8 iii" !4 5' Otl ~ .... (1) ~ V> OJ 3 "'C (1) ~ m 23 ..... o en N o ..... ....., N » m X -. a. ro Exide from cleaning up spills, washing down the facility, and other maintenance the Dropout Boxes. 5 ro '"~, m x 0 ..... 0 O"l N 0 ..... ....., w ""'OJ :::J C OJ » m X -. a. ro N 0 ~ ~ Exide I January 6, 2011 Mr. Mopas is collecting one of three samples, RW-EX from the Storn:1 Water Eetention Pond. Exide Photo of the area where hazardous waste acid tank Tk-63 was located at the Waste Wat~r Treatment plant. The tank was removed prior to the inspection and will be replaced by a similar tank. , 8 Februar the area where hazardous waste acid tank Tk-63 was located at the Waste IAbtbr tank was removed prior to the inspection and will be replaced by a similar tank. 9 Exide February_28, 2011 The water in the Storm Water Retention Pond was low and barely covered the sludge that the pond. 10 Exide Februarv 28, 2011 The water in the Storm Water Retention Pond was low and barely covered the sludge that the pond. 11 Februa , -.-,".< " """."""."."at The water in the Storm Water Retention Pond was low and barely covered the sludge ofthe pond. was on the bottom 12 Exide Febru_a_rv 28 The water in the Storm Water Retention Pond was low and barely covered the sludge the pond. 13 Exide "..,,:, _'l ''v,\- r '1- • ..='"' i>'lI!,.lii, "-E-'-fl'\ tf'! Hazardous waste storage area 108 contained spent lead acid batteries and other hazardous waste. There was adequate aisle space between each row of hazardous waste. Each pallet of batteries and other ha~ardous waste was marked with the appropriate label, which contained the required information. No leaks or spills werel noted. Areas 106 and 107 also in the photo were empty. I 14 Exide Hazardous waste storage area 108 contained spent lead acid batteries and other hazardous waste. There was adequate aisle space between each row of hazardous waste. Each pallet of batteries and other ha~ardous waste was marked with I the appropriate label, which contained the required information. No leaks or spills werel noted. Areas 106 and 107 are also in the photo were empty. , 1 5 Exide Februa Hazardous waste storage area 105 contained spent lead acid batteries and other haliardous waste. There was adequate aisle space between each row of hazardous waste. Each pallet of batteriekI and other hazardous waste was marked with the appropriate label, which contained the required information. iNo leaks or spills were noted. 16 Exide Februa (Q,lt:sa;! Hazardous waste storage area 104 contained spent lead acid batteries and other hazard aisle space between each row of hazardous waste. Each pallet of batteries and other 'i'l7"rdOUS waste was marked 17 noted. with the appropriate label, which contained the required information. No leaks or spills Exide Februa Hazardous waste storage area 103 contained spent lead acid batteries and other hazardous raste. There was adequate aisle space between each row of hazardous waste. Each pallet of batteries and other hazardous waste was marked with the appropriate label, which contained the required information. No leaks or spills were 18 Exide Februa 30 drums of hazardous waste lead dross were received from off-site and placed on rail spur. The loading dock is not an authorized area for storage. loading dock adjacent to the 19 Exide Februa 30 drums of hazardous waste lead dross were received from off-site and placed on the I rail spur. The loading dock is not an authorized area for storage. ing dock adjacent to the 20 Exide 30 drums of hazardous waste lead dross were received from off-site and placed on the rail spur. The loading dock is not an authorized area for storage. dock adjacent to the 21 Exide February 28, 2011 . ~ . --';;';"'~":{}:i~{~~~;-:~~:~~--:~')k,i::~~-:\--" ',_:l,):,~:-:i~17~~::'-:-:~':_ - ~'- '-.., " 30 drums of hazardous waste lead dross were received from off-site and placed on the loa rail spur. The loading dock is not an authorized area for storage. dock adjacent to the 22 Exide f,~,~r uc:lry 28, 2011 30 drums of hazardous waste lead dross were received from off-site and placed on the rail spur. The loading dock is not an authorized area for storage. ing dock adjacent to the 23 Exide February 28} 2011 30 drums of hazardous waste lead dross were received from off-site and placed on rail spur. The loading dock is not an authorized area for storage. loading dock adjacent to the 24 Exide March 7. 2011 Mr. Ed Mopas collected six water samples RWM3/7/20111A -6A from the pond. The sludge that was on the bottom of the pond. r barely covered the 25 Exide March 7, 2011 Mr. Ed Mopas collected six water samples RWM3!7!20111A -6A from the pond. The water barelv covered the sludge that was on the bottom of the pond. 26 Exide March 7, 2011 ~; Mr. Ed Mopas collected six water samples {RWM3/7/20111A -6A from the pond. The waterlbarelv covered the sludge that was on the bottom of the pond. 27 ","". Exide March 7, 2011 ._----. Mr. Ed Mopas collected six water samples RWM3/7/20111A -6A from the pond. The water Sludge that was Ol'l the bottom of the pond. 28 Exide March 7, 2011 The facility removed the 30 drums of hazardous waste lead dross that were stored on the February: 28, 2011. 29 Exide March 7, 2011 The facility removed the 30 drums of hazardous waste lead dross that were stored on the loading dock on February 28,2011. 30 Attachment 2 / f.-.W1f/- 01 Oro /J-iJ(NB J4tu1A~fK~ ()J~ b;JO /1 ~ J-j3 ~!t)<.- 0 f 00;31J (/ - 3/3 IuD /vi !fy - DI vb ?Of/ -.tiE jlpUJr/tl- DI or:, ?-Oil ~ Sf!, trJ rvr/ Y;7 ~ 01 IX::> ~II - folS ,, DEPARTME,"T OF TOXIC SU8STANCES CONTROL ENVIRO,"ME,"TAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY" LOS ANGELES 1449 W. TEMPLE STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90026 TELEPHO,"E (213) 580,,5797: (213)482-9739 CASE NARRATIVE 1. THIS ANALYTICAL REPORT PACKAGE WAS PREPARED FOR ECl SAMPLE(S) SAMPLE AUTHORIZATION NO. : ./,-U02083,,- ALJ02088 10SC0112 SAMPLES INCLUDED IN THIS ANALYTICAL 8ATCH ARE: 2. SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED ON 11612011 AT ALJ02083 - AU.02088 .~ TECHN.Q'!'.QGIES POQ S. INDIANA, LOS ANGELES, CA 90058 3. COLLECTOR'S NAME ON THE SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUEST FORM IS E1!IH WILLIAMS-MOREHEAD 4. SAMPLES WERE: DIGESTED ON 11612Q11 BY ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY-LA 111112011 BY EPA METHOD .3050~ ACID DIGESTION BY EPA METHOD 6010B ICP-AES ANALYZED ON . DATA PACKAGE WAS COMPLETED ON 112612011 5. DURING THE COURSE OF THESE MALYSIS. NO PROBLEMS WERE ENCOUNTERED 6 DC PARAMETERSIINDICATORS WERE WITHIN CONTROL LIMITS. 7. INSTRUMENT INITIAL CALIBRATION & CONTINUING CALIBRATION CRITERIA WEHE MET_ 8. SAMPLE HOLDING TIME WAS MET. 2 DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL CHEMISTF,Y LABORATORY·· LOS ANGELES 1449 W. TEMPLE STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90026 TELEPHONE (213) 580-5797; (213)482.9739 I:NVIF~ONMENTAL INDEX EPA 6010B FOR SAMPLE (S) AU02083· AU02088 PAGE 1 CASE NARRATIVE 2 INDEX 2 3. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUEST FORMS 3 4. 4 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT (S) 5. QC REPORT FOR a. b. c. d. 6. 5 Method Blank Calibration Verification Standard Laboratory Control Sample Sample Duplicate Analysis QC REPORT FOR Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate % Recovery TOTAL PAGES 0 6 6 State of California 12. Supplemental Requests: Enler sample IDs as d(}scribed in Ibam 9 De$lro,d Analysis I S'amplo(s) fD -II!V4:~"-""l-" , II DEPAPTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LA3010 3.3 20 103 105 70 ·130 4.5 20 1,674 95 100 70 - 130 11 --" .•.20 ~ 115 9.073 113 114 70 - 130 1.7 8.396 105 8.298 104 104 70 - 130 12 - 8.0 9.662 121 9,537 119 120 70 - 130 1.3 20 0.0000 8.0 8.476 106 8.406 . 105 106 70 - 130 0.83 20 0.0000 8.0 9.588 120 9.428 116 119 70· 130 1.7 20 2.625 8.0 11.78 114 11,32 109 112 70 - 1SO 5.2 20 Sb - ANTIMONY 0.0000 8.0 8.808 110 8,993 112 ".," 111 70 - 130 2,1 20 Se - SELENIUM' 0.0000 1.6 2,758 172 2.341 146 . 159 70 - 130 16 20 ~ALLIUM 0.0000 8.0 7.774 97 7.743 97 70 - 130 OAO 20 V -VANADIUM 0.0000 8.0 8.245 103 8.207 103 103 70 - 130 0.46 20 1.496 8.0 10.34 111 10.20 109 110 1.6 20 Ag - SILVER 0.0000 8.0 8119 101 8.049 101 101 As - ARSENIC 0.0000 8.0 8.179 102 8.740 109 106 Sa - BARIUM 0.0000 8.0 8680 108 8.379 105 Be - BERYLLIUM 0.0000 1.6 1,716 107 1.640 Cd -CADMIUM 0,162 1.6 1.842 105 Co· COBALT 0,0000 8.0 9.233 Cr - CHROMIUM 0.0000 8.0 Cu - COPPER 0,0000 Mo - MOLYBDENUM Ni - NICKEL -,- '-- Pb - LEAD Zn - ZINC -,~.~,,-. . 97 '",", 70 - 130 . NOTES: AVE % REC FOR SELENIUM IS OUTSIDE OF CONTROl LIMITS MAYBE BECAUSE OF MATRIX EFFECTS. //2Uii DATE ( MARIO '(IINOYA DATE ""." 20 20 """.oem i 1 DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCE CONTROL ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL LABORATORY - LOS ANGELES 1449 W. TEMPLE STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90026 TELEPHONE (213) 5S0c 5797 CASE NARRATIVE 1. THIS ANALYTICAL REPORT PACKAGE WAS PREPARED FOR ECL SAMPLE(S) SAMPLE AUTHORIZATION NO. : 10SCO'I12 BERP Chats SAMPLES INCLUDED IN THIS ANALYTICAL BATCH 1/6/2011 AU02083 •.AI!.:?.9.!!!t. . __ 2. SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED ON 3. COLLECTOR'S NAME ON TKE SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUEST FORM IS 4. SAMPLES WERE: RECEIVED ON ANALYZED ON AlJ020S3-AU02088 AT EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES RUTH WILLIAMS-MOREHEAD 1/6/201.'-1_ _ _ _ _ _ BY ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY- LA. _...;1;.,;/1.;;1/;;;,20:;,:1,.;.1_ _ _ _ BY EPA ME'rHOD DATA PACKAGE WAS COMPLETED ON 90408 pH ELECTROMETRIC MEASUREMENT ...:1;.,;/1.;;1/,.;.11'--_ __ 5. DURING THE COURSE OF THESE ANALYSES, NO PROBLEM WAS ENCOUNTERED. 6. QC PARAMETERS/INDICATORS WERE WITHIN CONTROL LIMITS. 7 INSTRUMENT INITIAL CALIBRATION & CONTINUING CALIBRATION CRITERIA WERE MET. 8. SAMPLE HOLDING TIME WAS MET. 2 DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCE CONTROL EI,VIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL LABORATORY - LOS ANGELES 1449 W. TEMPLE STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90026 TELEPHONE (213) 580-5797 INDEX EPA 9040B FOR SAMPLE (8) AU02083·A~02088 PAG.E I. CASE NARRATIVE 2, INDEX 2 3, HAZARDOUS MATERIAI.S SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUEST FORMS 3 4, LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT (8) 4 TOTAL PAGES = 4 Oepartme'rlt of loxie. Substancas Control State of Caltfornfa 3 Acencv --..--------1 .. -~---- ----.~----------------~-I_---------------f__-------0lh;~·;~1s-:1'------~~-·"----~~"·----+----"~~-~-~~"--------------------~-~-------.---.,.---- ~~~_:__----____1----------~_+_:_=_.__,._;___----_+__----___I ~' SPLIT SAMPLE RECEIPT: Recei ed from representatives of the Department of Toxic Substances Control on '7 (30 II , a requested duplicate from samples acq uired under the authority of Tit e 2, California Code of Regulations, section 66272.1. The samples are numbered as follows: Qw M 2,\-7 , 2·ILvu M ?>h 1. 3. 4. 5. ~. vu \VI (Lvv (vi }"0 II ~ II:; 7. ")..,) I I - 'd-13 8. ':>h IWI\ - ~~ ':>b 'WII- "-IB va ~)~·I 3ft I,/{) 1/ - c. b ,1,/ ytI)JiU IJ/, tVI/ - 6/ 9. 0 10. 11. I v 6. Facility Representative: 12. Department of Toxic Substances Control: ~ Print Na A. V0'(ft(JJl/1{~ f!o((eje.~ Print Name @ Printed on Recycled Paper Attachment 4 From: "MOPAS, Ed (Vernon)" To: Michal Haynes , Ruth Williams-Morehead From: Carl Kelley [mailto:ckelley@pacificstates.net] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 10:25 AM To: MOPAS, Ed (Vernon); Paul Stratman Subject: Work Summary for TK-63 Importance: High Ed We completed the demolition of TK-63: Former Acid Tank from WWT on March 24, 2011. Here is a summary of the work completed: 1. H&S Meeting at 10:00 2. 11 :00 went into the RMPS building and looked at tank -- tank was laying on side and looked pretty clean inside with some debris inside 3. Tank is made of HDPE and not fiberglass 4. All work was completed in the RMPS Building, which is under negative air pressure to control emissions 5. We tried several methods of cutting the tank -- gas powered saw with diamond blade, sawzall, skill ------s-aw:-<3HlrVuwered-dm-noTcut-very-we1l-ana-tlw-,;awzalI ands-Klil saw did cut lJut was slow. 6. Using a pressure washer, the outside surface was cleaned with the rinse water going into sump and pumped to WWT 7. Started to cut up the tank using the sawzall and skill saw and went to Home Depot and bought an Echo chain saw. 8. Broke for lunch 9. Tried chain saw and it worked and was much faster than the other two saws 10. Cut off the top into four pieces, pressured wash each, and collected a rinse sample from one panel: Top-1 at 2:30. pH of rinse water was 7.8 11. Top panels were transferred out side on the south side of the building and placed onto plastic 12. The sides of the tank were then cut into long panels and then into smaller panels 13. Side panels were pressured washed and four samples (Side-1, 2, 3, and 4) of the rinse water from four separate panels were collected at 3:30, 4:35,5:18, and 5:35. The pHs were 7.8, 7.8, 8.2, and 7.8. 14. The bottom was cut into several pieces and a sample (BTM-1) of the rinse water from one of the panels was collected after the panel was pressured washed -- pH 7.4 15. The tank panels (side and bottom).were placed onto plastic outside and on the south side of the building. 16. The stock pile of tank panels was covered with plastic. 17. Samples were taken to the laboratory for testing at 6:00 while the area where the tank was cut up inside the building was cleaned up to remove the HOPE cuttings and the cuttings were placed into a pile for Exide to handle. 18. Everyone off site around 7:00. The tank panels will be disposed or recycled after receiving the test results. This should occur during the week of March 27, 2011. Pacific States Environmental Contractors, Inc. Carl S. Kelley III Senior Project Manager 714-258-8285 714-258-8401 fax 714-222-3833 (cell) This message (including any attachments) may contain protected information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not a named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify sender bye-mail and delete this e-mail. - - - - - - - - -- - - , Page 1 of 12 -~ d;" =,.s • I. alsclence ==- !!iF'""nvironmental Laboratories, Inc. March 28, 2011 Ed Mopas Exide Technologies 2700 South Indiana Street Vernon, CA 90023-0957 Subject: Cal science Work Order No.: 11-03-1767 Client Reference: Exide Tank Clean Dear Client: Enclosed is an analytical report for the above-referenced project. The samples included in this report were received 3/24/2011 and analyzed in accordance with the attached chain-of-custody. Cal science Environmental Laboratories certifies that the test results provided in this report meet all NELAC requirements for parameters for which accreditation is required or available. Any exceptions to NELAC requirements are noted in the case narrative. The original report of subcontracted analysis, if any, is provided herein, and follows the standard Cal science data package. The results in this analytical report are limited to the samples tested and any reproduction thereof must be made in its entirety. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Sincerely, Calscience Environmental Laboratories. Inc. Amanda Porter Project Manager .II I ~ NELAP 10: 03220CA' OoO-ELAP 10: L 10-41 • CSOLAC 10: 10109 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427. • TEL:(714) 895-5494 • SCAQMO 10: 93LA0830 FAX: (714) 894-7501 Page 2 of 12 I. ~ 1...J!/science ;;; _ nvironmental Analytical Report 6 ,., aboratories, Inc. Date Received: 03/24/11 Work Order No: 11-03-1767 Preparation: EPA 3010A Total 1 EPA 7470A Total Method: EPA 6010B 1 EPA 7470A Units: mg/L Page 1 of 3 Exide Technologies 2700 South Indiana Street Vernon, CA 90023-0957 Project: Exide Tank Clean TOP·1 Comment(s): Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Da!erTime AnalyZed QC Batch ID 031:14111 14;30 Aqueous ICP 5300 03125111 03125111 18:17 110325LA3 -Mercury analysis was performed on 03/25/11 15:04 with batch 11 0325L03. Result Antimony Arsenic NO NO Barium 0,0916 Beryllium NO NO NO NO Cadmium Chromium Cobalt RL 0,0150 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0158 0,0402 Copper Lead OF Qual 1 Parameter Result Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Mercury Zinc NO NO NO NP NO NO NO NO 0'3/24111 ICP5300 11'03'1 fef,'";!>.: SIDE~1 Comment(s): j5:30 Result 0,0621 0,0198 0,102 Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead RL 0,0150 0,0100 0.0100 0,0100 0,0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0,0100 NO NO NO NO 0,0577 1,27 BTM·1 OF Parameter Result Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Mercury Zinc NO NO NO NO NO NO NO .Q1!§l 1 1 H3·1161·!j·A Comment(S): Aq'l!ocins RL 0,0100 0.0100 0,0150 0.00500 0,0150 0.0100 0,000500 0,0100 03/25/11 OF Qual 1 03125111 18:19 110325LA3 -Mercury analysis was performed on 03/25/11 15:06 with batch 11 0325L03. Parameter -lVlercury analysis was Parameter Result Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead NO NO i Collected 11'03;1767.j.A Parameter .1. Daterrime Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number RL 0,0150 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0933 NO NO NO NO 0,0135 0,170 RL· Reporting Limit ~ peFformedOrllJ37257il~ DF OF - Dilution Factor, 03/24111 15:15 Aqueous 0,0266 lep 5300 RL 00100 0.0100 0,0150 0.00500 0,0150 0,0100 0,000500 0,0100 03/2511 '1 OF lli!ill 1 03125111 18:24 110325LA3 with batch 11 o325~ Qual Parameter Result Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Sliver Thallium Vanadium Mercury Zinc NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO RL 0,0100 0,0100 0,0150 0.00500' 0,0150 0,0100 0,000500 0.0100 OF Qual Qual - Qualifiers 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL.(714) 895-5494' FAX: (714) 894·7501 , , ,, Page 3 of 12 t' a/science 1:._ nvironmental Analytical Report ~ ... aboratories, Inc. Date Received: 03/24/11 Work Order No: 11-03-1767 Preparation: EPA 3010A Total 1 EPA 7470A Total Method: EPA 601 OB 1 EPA 7470A Units: mg/L Page 2 of 3 Exide Technologies 2700 South Indiana Street Vernon, CA 90023-0957 Project: Exide Tank Clean SIOE·2 Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Daterrime Collected Analyzed QC Balch 10 03/2<[/1 f Aij'\.I:ec;)lI$, ICP5S00 03125/1 '1 03/25/1.1 110325LA3 Daterrime Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number 11·03·11e1;4'A' C,omment(s); ~6:35 18:26 -Mercury analysis was performed on 03/25/11 15:15 with batch 11 0325L03. Parameter Result RL Antimony 0,0423 Arsenic Barium 0,107 0,0150 0,01 00 0,0100 NO NO NO NO NO Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Lead Qual B&.§JJ!1 RL OF Molybdenum 0,01 00 0,0100 0,0150 1 Vanadium Mercury NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Zinc 0,0133 Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 SIDl;:~3 Parameter 1 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0437 0,868 Copper OF 03/24f11 11-03-1767"S-A Aqueous ICP 5300 0,00500 0,0150 00100 0,000500 0,0100 03125111 17:18 Comment(s): Result Antimony Arsenic NO NO Barium Beryllium 0,091 RL 0,0150 ° Cadmium Chromium Cobalt NO NO NO NO Copper Lead 00178 0,174 OF lli!.9l 0,01 00 O,OWO 0,0100 0,0100 0.0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 810E-4 Parameter Result Molybdenum NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Mercury Zinc 11.03,j7.7,s,A 03124111 17:32 Result 0,0206 Antimony RL 0,0150 0.0100 NO Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium 0.0979 Qual 1 0.0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0100 0,0247 0,776 RL - Reportmg Limit, ~ OF 0.0100 0,0100 0,0100 NO NO NO NO Cobalt Copper Lead I 110325LA3 ';Aqlie()~s ICP 5300 OF RL 0,0100 0,0100 0,0150 0,00500 Qual 0,0150 0,0100 0,000500 0,0100 03/25111 63/25/11 110325LA3 18:30 -Mercury analysis was performed on 03/25/11 15:20 with batch 11 0325L03. Parameter _II 03/25/11 18:28 -Mercury analysis was performed on 03/25/11 15:18 with batch 11 0325L03, Parameter Comment(s): lli@l DF - Dilution Factor Parameter Result Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Mercury Zinc OF RL 0,01 00 lli!.9l 1 0,0100 0,0150 0,00500 0,0150 0.0100 0,000500 0,0100 Qual - Qualifier$ 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427' TEL:(714) 895-5494' FAX: (714) 894-7501 Page 4 of 12 &: alscience ~ nvironmental Analytical Report . . aboratories, Inc. Exide Technologie~ 2700 South Indiana Street Vernon, CA 90023-0957 Date Received: 03/24/11 Work Order No: 11-03-1767 Preparation: EPA 301 OA Total 1 EPA 7470A Total Method: EPA 6010B 1 EPA 7470A Units: mg/L Page 3 of 3 Project: Exide Tank Clean Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number 099~04·008.51275 Method Blank Comment(s): Result RL Mercury ND 0.000500 Parameter Result RL Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO 0.0150 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 Chromium Cobalt Copper RL - Reporting Limit, ~ OF Instrument Date Prepared Daterrime Analyzed 110325L03 110325LA3 N/A Aqueous Mercury 03125/11 03125111 14:22 NIA Aqui;)ou's' lOP 5300 03125111 03125111 17:41 QC Batch ID Qual 1 097.01.0~.3.11.516 Method Blank l Matrix ·Preparation/analysis for Mercury was performed by EPA 7470A. Parameter .1. Date !Time Collected OF Q.tJ.a[ 1 OF· Dilution Factor, Parameter Result RL OF Lead Molybdenum Nickel Selenium NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0150 0.00500 0.0150 0.0100 0.0100 1 Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc Qual Qual - Qualifiers 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427' TEL:(714) 895-5494' FAX: (714) 894-7501 ., ,. Page 5 of 12 C alscience ;; ~nvironmental Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate ~ . . aboratories, Inc. Exide Technologies 2700 South Indiana Street Vernon, CA 90023-0957 Date Received: Work Order No: Preparation: Method: 03/24/11 11-03-1767 EPA 3010A Total EPA6010B Project Exide Tank Clean Matrix Quality Control Sample ID Aqu"e6q~ 11-03-1736-3 Parameter .1. Date Instrument Date Prepared Analyzed Number ICP 5300 03125/11 03/25/11 110325SA3 MS/MSD Batch MS %REC MSD %REC %REC CL RPD RPD CL Antimony 95 97 72-132 2 0-10 Arsenic 104 99 80-140 5 0-11 Barium 105 100 87-123 4 0-6 Beryllium 106 102 89-119 4 0-8 Cadmium 102 99 82-124 3 0-7 Chromium 105 102 86-122 3 0-6 Cobalt 101 99 83-125 3 0-7 Copper 103 99 78-120 4 0-7 Lead 100 96 84-120 3 0-7 Molybdenum 101 97 78-126 4 0-7 Nickel 104 101 84-120 3 0-7 Selenium 104 99 79-127 5 0-9 Silver 105 100 86-128 5 0-7 Thallium 102 98 79-121 4 0-8 Vanadium 105 101 ·88-118 4 0-7 Zinc 110 105 89-131 4 0-8 I RPD - Relati'e Peccect Differecce . ~ Qualifiers CL - Caelrol Limit 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427. TEL:(714) 895-5494. FAX: (714) 894-7501 ,. ,, Page 6 of 12 ,,= alscience iii-_nvironmental ~ Quality Control - POS I POSO . . aboratories, Inc. Exide Technolo(lies 2700 South Indiana Street Vernon, CA 90023-0957 Project: 03/24/11 11-03-1767 EPA 301 OA Total EPA 601 DB Date Received Work Order No: Preparation: Method: Exide Tank Clean Date Analyzed Date Matrix Quality Control Sample ID Aqueous 11·03·1736·3 Instrument ICP 5300 03/25111 03/25111 t10325SA3 Parameter PDS %REC PDSD%REC %REC CL RPD RPD CL Antimony 90 90 75-125 0 0-10 Arsenic Barium 92 91 101 101 101 75-125 75-125 103 100 101 75-125 75-125 75-125 99 75-125 Lead 97 99 98 99 96 75-125 75-125 Molybdenum Nickel 98 99 97 101 75-125 75-125 Selenium 100 98 90 75-125 Beryllium Cadmium 98 101 Chromium Cobalt Copper· Silver 91 Thallium Vanadium 98 101 Zinc 105 .1 a 1 RPD - Relative Percent Difference, ~ 97 100 105 PDS I PDSD Batch Number Prepared lli@l.lf.l.e.r. 0-11 0-6 2 0-8 2 0-7 0-8 0 2 0 3 2 1 3 75-125 75-125 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-9 0-7 0-8 75-125 0 75-125 0 0-7 0-8 CL - Control Limit 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427. TEL:(714) 895-5494. FAX: (714) 894-7501 ". Page 7 of 12 &; alscience =._nvironmental Laboratories, Inc. Quality Control· Spike/Spike Duplicate Dale Received: Work Order No: Preparation: Method: Exide Technologies 2700 South Indiana Street Vernon, CA 90023-0957 03/24/11 11-03-1767 EPA 7470A Total EPA 7470A Project Exi<;le Tank Clean Matrix Quality Control Sample 10 Aq'lr~,~'~'s " 11-03-1687-8 Parameter Mercury .11 I RPD - RelaHve Percent Difference.. ~ Instrument ' M~;rcurY Date Prepared Dale Analyzed MSIMSD Batch 03/25111 03/25111 110325S03 MS %REC MSD %REC %REC CL 109 108 57-141 RPD Number RPD CL Qualifiers 0-10 CL - Control Limit 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427. TEL:(714) 895-5494. FAX: (714) 894-7501 Page 8 of 12 ·" ~ . i.:!!!sclence =-!!IF_nvironmental Quality Control· LCS/LCS Duplicate # . . . aboratortes, Inc. Exide Technologies 2700 South Indiana Street Vernon, CA 90023"0957 NIA 11-03"1767 EPA 301 OA Total EPA 6010B Date Received: Work Order No: Preparation: Method: Project: Exide Tank Clean Quality Control Sample 10 097-01·003·11,516 Parameter Matrix· Instrument Date Prepared Aqu$QUS IGP .300. 0.3/25111 LCSD %REQ %REC CL 80-120 80-120 80-120 80·120 80·120 60-120 80-120 80-120 80-120 80-120 80-120 80-120 80-120 80-120 60-120 80-120 LCS %RE;C Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead 96 94 101 96 99 99 103 100 98 91 106 90 99 98 96 101 Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc 98 95 101 99 98 99 102 101 100 95 105 93 99 101 96 101 LCS/LCSD Batch Date Analyzed Number 110325LA3 03125/11 MLQ.b RPD 73·127 73·127 73·127 73-127 73·127 73-127 73·127 2 2 0 3 0 0 73~127 0 2 4 73-127 73-127 73·127 73-127 73·127 73-127 73·127 73-127 3 0 3 0 0 RPD CL 0-20 0·20 0·20 0-20 0-20 0-20 0-20 0-20 0-20 0-20 0-20 0-20 0-20 0·20 0-20 0·20 Qualifiers Total number of LCS compounds: 16 Total number of ME compounds: 0 Total number of ME compounds allowed: LCS ME CL validation result: Pass RPD Relative Percent Difference, CL - Control Limit 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427. TEL:(714) 895·5494. FAX: (714) 894-7501 ... Page 9 of 12 ~ ; ; alscience ~ _nvironmental Laboratories, Inc. i!P Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate Exide Technologies 2700 South Indiana Street Vernon, CA 90023-0957 Date Received: Work Order No: Preparation: Method: N/A 11-03-1767 EPA 7470A Total EPA 7470A Project: Exide Tank Clean Instrument Prepared Date Anal zed Mercury 03125/11 03/25/11 Date Quality Control Sample ID Matrix 099-04·008.5,275 Aqueous Parameter LCS %REC Mercury .1. 1 99 RPD - Relative Percent Difference, ~~_._.. LCSO %REC 99 %REC CL LCS/LCSO Batch Number 110325LOS RPO RPO CL Qualifiers 85·121 0·10 TEL:(714) 895·5494. FAX: (714) 894-7501 CL - Control limit 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427. Page 10·01 12 L= alscience s;;;;;;- __nvironmental = aboratories, Inc. Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers S Work Order Number: Qualifier < > 2 3 4 5 B BU E ET J ME ND Q x z 11-03·1767 Definition See applicable analysis comment. Less than the indicated value. Greater than the indicated value. Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to a required sample dilution, therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification. Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank surrogate spike compound was in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification. Recovery of the Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) compound was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated LCS and/or LCSD was in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification. The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to matrix interference. The LCS/LCSD RPD was in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification. The PDS/PDSD or PES/PESD associated with this batch of samples was out of control due to a matrix interference effect. The associated batch LCS/LCSD was in control and, hence, the associated sample data was reported without further clarification. Analyte was present in the associated method blank. Sample analyzed after holding time expired. Concentration exceeds the calibration range. Sample was extracted past end of recommended max. holding time. Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting limit and above the laboratory method detection limit. Reported value is estimated. LCS Recovery Percentage is within LCS ME Control Limit range. Parameter not detected at the indicated reporting limit. Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the sample exceeding· the spike concentration by a factor of four or greater. % Recovery and/or RPD out-of-range. Analyte presence was not confirmed by second column or GC/MS analysis. Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not corrected for % moisture. All QC results are reported on a wet weight basis. ~ -----------------------------------------------------7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427' TEL:(714) 895-5494' FAX: (714) 894-7501 C~ience Enviro~mental Laboratories, Inc. 1I-~ o Cal Laboratory 40 Uncoln Way Irden Grove, CA 92841-1427 J14) 895 5494 LABORATOGIX:: 117F _ /vi'?0 W 8J - [ll [Z] [6l LZI ? #<; &0 / c./J-#~ I P E-MAIL: I o o SAME DAY I D24HR COELTEDF J o D72HR zs;,8 HR STANDARD \ I d> en M " o SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: = lAB I SAMPLE 10 I DATF ONLY i ToP-I 7-- S I n;::;-- I ...3> 13Tt7l1- I /L 6I1JE- ~ J 5/DG- ~ 6 , ~ SAMPLING 6/lJ£- 4 S/'~·14 /,"1-- \ TlME 3/3? ( 1 I ~ c ::> '"'" ~ m '~" CL I t:-- ( 1 ( ) ~ c:;. ;Yt; UJ 4//'; ) NO. OF MATRIX CONT. '"~ '"~m l Lf:?,.'S ( 5: 1<;:- ) 1 6;32 S I I '" ~ " ~'" u:: '" W u:: S 0~ " '" §" " '" x - x ::c 0:: 0:: 0 W m >- '0 - :r ~ ~ X- 0 = ~ ew ill m > 0 ~ ~ c 0 " 0 u c W ~ ~ w u ~ ~ :!2 0 if> '" CL ~ ~ 0 0 o r::: e- = ;C; 0 o e~ ~ 0 N 0 ~ '" '" = = -= '" -== 1ll '" -= = '" '" > ~ 0 e- 0 OJ D- ~ 0 <0 -= en M d> USE REQUESTED ANALYSES 0 ." c:.l7-jLL j::-6/1£; ~ ::l= u LOG CODE GLOBAL10 - - SAMPLER(S): (PRINT) PROJECT CONTACT: ZIP t of P.O. NO-: jgfj 17 IE III- N/C. . CJ4Et9J..i STATE TURNAROUND TIME: 7 Page CliENT PROJECT NAME f NUMBER !! CITY TEL: '7/~LjII/ Date WO#/LA8 USE ONLY (925) 689-9022 ~ () , ADDRESS: NorCa! Service Center 5063 Commercial Circle, Suite H Concord, CA 94520--8577 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD c0- = e=ro ro 0 <'3 X . en C(3 0 > W-ill4~Mllli-<~;')'lli''~~_' "MOP AS, Ed (Vernon)" , Paul Stratman <."'Io' ~~~"'" '3" iI~ II "' "' -fMIICilllonsCffiTnut"'be-accepled"'wllhoul"'lbe..reguiredJee_lBul§i J01). Asbeslos removals 01 less than 100 square leet are exempl from notification and fees. Please make checks payable to "SCAQMO'. Fees are per notification, not refundable, and vary accoroinglotl'leprojeclsizec-Fees-are-as-follows' PROJECT SIZE In square feo\ 1,000 or less """""""",-"'"""'"',"""'"'""""',,"" 1.001 \05,000 ",",,,,",,,,,,, ...,,.. """",.. 5,0011010,000 -""""""',, ....""""" 10,001 1050,000,,""'''''""""'-''""'''"''· 50,001 10 100,000 -"""""-""'"""'""'''"' 100,001 ormore "-"""':'"":-'"'"'-"'"'"'"""'. DEMOLITION OR REMOVAL $ 53.15 """"""""""""'~"""""""" $ 162.49 "'""--"""""""""",,".."""""""" $ 380.33 """"""""""""..,,'-"" $ 596. 38"",," . ,,"""'''''"""'''"''''' $ 864.30 "'''"'"'''"""''"'-''""'"''"". $ '1 ,440.49 """""-""-,,-,,-,,-""""""' '-ADDITIONAL SERVICE CHARGES Special Handling Fee ,," $ 5315 Revision 10 Nolification" ":0 5315 Returned Check Fee"',," $ 25.00 Planned Renovation "" , $ 596.38 Procedure 4 or 5 Plan-"'""$ 596.38 Exeedlled 4 or 5 Plan ...... $ 298.19 ATTENTION: Keep a copy of your notlficaflon. S\ale law requires thai you provide a copy 01 Ihe demolition nolification 10 Building and Safely before Issuance of a demolition permit For questions oaIl909"396"2336. Please mall the form and fee to AQMD, Mailing saves lime, money and reduces Irafflc and air pollution c-., .. MAIL FORM AND FEE TO: SCAQMD, ASBESTOS NOTIFICATIONS, FILE # 55641, LOS ANGELeS CA ~007H041 FORMS, INSTRUCTIONS, AND THE RULE 1403 CAN BE OBTAINED FROM AOMD WEB SITE. AT HTrP:/rWWW.AQ:tVIQJ:J9j:. SCAOMO Is located al 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765"4182 PHONE: (909) 396"2336 FAX: (909) 396·3342 Pg 2 of 2 REV20110114 - - Attachment 5 Pie, se orinl or IVDe, IForm desicned lor use on elile l12'ollchi' ) Number UNIFORM HAZARDOUS 1, "'i" , ' 1 2, pa g;1 01 "Illdlffer,nt Ami'!'II!l1i~i;m AC(;®f$I!H::;ri~$ illl::" ." SU"i{iil Rhi". ,lI,\f""tiil, I Spear QP " h r ,." ..... :;~;,~:~~;:~:i:f:';~~~~I'p::n:re c.l>ssifiad packagad, 'I re~;'1 , I export I and I am the Primary national '-, AA "lY#'"/ SIQnaftiiO , .;jJJ'A (; I 18, i ··t~;- '1' "'~I ;/ IMontn I uay I Year - -- - - - o Typa D Quantity 18a. Discrepancy Indication Space .0 -O-Restdue Partial Rejection o Full Rejection M"Heel Raferen" Nombec: I~ I U,S, EPAIO Nombar 'acilnytoc "enarator) I I Facililv's Phone: ~ l18c-:-S~nal~re6~-I' 1, t, disposal, .s (I.a" codes Holt) i 12QOesionat , .. jName (): n (t-;J 1\ 10/-' , . 1 01 receipll r.(:. EPAForm 8700-22~3-05) Pr8ViOUfeditions are obsolete. II j by thO' I Year 14. I I Day Ii osvsiamsl 13 l I Monlh I nolad in lIem18a SlgnaW'-;;[J L, . (iii J) 1/, I ",:-1:-:- l2:h IJRll'r FACILITY TO DESTINATION STATE (IF REQUIRED) !? /1/ ".-. ATK eel/Speer Operations 2299 Snake River Avenue Debit Mllmo f>iJ Invoice 0 Lewiston, 10 83501 2087462351 FAX 208 746 8275 Shipping Order f>iJ PURCHASED FROM: SHIP TO: EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES 2700 SOUTH INDIANA STREET LOS ANGELES CA 90023 EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES 3900 E 26TH STREET LOS ANGELES CA 90023 6213 Number: CC: ENVIRO i -I i PO NumberlDate: Vendor Invoice NumberlDate: L_==:JL_ _1 ,- Return Authorization: [TONi-_~~==~ ___ _ _~IL __ ' _ _......:D"e"s"c::r"ip::t::io::n'---_ _ _ _. _.. ___...__ "_. __ ._~_-+ Reference w/?'s: J §meSbUrg Unit Price Date: II I 21113111 Dollar Amount RETURNING FOR CREDIT 18,7241bs Lead dross (8100099) (0008 material) Manifest # 003517661 FLE 19,677 gross - 953 tare 30 boxes #1-30 .683 ! $12,788.49 18,724 x (1.18 x 85%) 18,724 x 1.003 - .32 21,3221bs 639 Ibs $0.00 Mixed lead scrap (8100093) 22,316 gross - 994 tare 20 boxes #1-20 .683 $14,562.93 21,322x(1.18x85%) 21,322 x 1.003 - .32 $0.00 rubber mats used for shipment $0.00 .-- ""'-T/p./J i ' . ~--:::> /..-<2- I' ~7--/ ) / i i/ r---~ TOTAL: i $27,351.42 Shipping Order-Slralght 8111 af Ladlng-shart Farm Ortglnal-Not Negotiable RECEIVED SubJact to the classifications ~nd la@slneffeclanlhadateoflhe Issue of Ihls Bill of Lading Ihe property descMbed below, In apparent good orcl6f, except as noted (contents and condition of contents of packages, unknown,) marked, consigned and destined as Indicated below, which s~ld carrier (Ihe word carrier being understood Ihroughout this contract as meaning any person or corporation In possession of the property under the conlract) agrees 10 carry to its usual place of delivery at said destination, If on Its roule, otherwise to deliver 10 another carrier on the routo to said desUn~tlon. It Is mutually agreed, as 10 each carrier of all or any said property formed hereunder shall be subject to alilhe lerms and oondltlons oflhe Uniform Oomesllc Straight 13111 of Lading sel forth (1) In OffiCial, Southam, Western and illinois Freight Classifications In effecl on the date hereof, If this Is a rail or rail water shipment, or (2) in Ihe applicable motor carrter classlflcallon or tariff If this Is a mator carrier Shipment, Shipper heraby certifies that he Is familiar with all tile terms and conditions of the said bill ofl~dlng, Including lllOse on the back thereof, set forth In Ihe classification orlarlffwhlch governs the Iransportatlon of this shipment, and Ihe said lerms and conditions are hereby agreed 10 by the shipper Bnd accepted far himself and his assigns. ~--+---- ......--..- - - - - - - - Value: -~------------;------, i I Ship Via: li..__.. _ _$0.00 _ ~I IFREIGHTWAYS Date Shipped ,--=,;2/l'L~-,-,71.___ '1_ J This is to certify that the above-named material Is properly olassified, described, paokaged, marked and labeled and is In proper condition for transportation to \he ~1i"bl'Z1~Ofth~~~~t of Tm::;," _ _ ~ __________ .. , L __~-1U~-----_----. . " Original: Vendor Copies: 2wAccounting, 1wPurchasing, 1wShipplng, 1-Carrier, 1-Packing List Attachment 6 -- €XIDE. T'EC:t'lNOLOGIES 5186105 S EAST PENN MANUFACTURING (TOLLI .~ ATTN: RICKY LEIBY o DEKA ROAD ," 'r LYON STATION PA 19536 o S H ~ ~ o EAST PENN MANUFACTURING ATTN: FfICKY LEIBY DEt;:,TR~E;::cE;::cT;;:-STREET _ _-"'A,.cT-:-T"'N.... : c::-=,:,R-=I,=C7K:,-:Y-,=L",E-=I7B..!..Y_-;-;:;-=-:;-~~ ANGELE,S CA 90023 DESTINATION LYON STATION PA ZIP-'1,..,9"'5"'3,.,6'--_ _ CNW ROUTE~_~_______~---------~-----PACKAGES Received $ to apply In prepayment of the charges on the property described hereon. FREIGHT CHARGES o prepaid [}*;ollect Charges f\dvanced: Agent or Cashier --(The signature here acknowledges only the amount prepaid). • If the shipment mo~ea between two ports by a carrier by w~\ai', the law raqulres that \he sm of Ladlng shall state whetl ''carrier's or shipper's welghf. NOTE - When the rata Is depandant on value, shippers are required 10 state specifically In the agread or declared value 01 Ihe property..The'agreed or declared value of the property Is hereby lipaoiflcally staled by the shipper to be nol exceeding $ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ P" Subject 10 Sernlon 7 of Conditions of applloable bill of ladJng, II this shipment Is 10 be delivered to the consignee without on the conslgnor,!ha consignor shall sign Iha following stslament. The carrier shall not make dellv€IIY of this shipman! without paymenl of freight end all other lawfUl oharges. $-~~--- This Is 10 Certify that the above named ·materlals are properly classified described, packaged, marked, and labeled and are In proper condition for transportation according to the appllcable regulations of the Department of Transportation and the Commandant of the Coast Guard. PLACARDS REQUIRED PLACARDS SUPPLIED DYES 0 NO, furnished by Orly, Driver Signature SHIPPER EXIOE TECHNOLOGIES CARRIER ____________________:--_____ -~ER~____~~~-~~~';~~;~~'~~~·~,~~~' ~·~~7"~~·~~·~-----------2~a-------------____----____--__- __. DATE;;;:L-:::z...,:·- , // ' DATE_~______________________ --- ~XIOE. TECHN,OLOGIES 02126/11 T EAST PENN MANUFACTUR1NG (TOLL! ATTN: RlCl(Y LEIBY' DEI(A ROAD LYON STATION PA 19536 S H EAST PENN MAN\jFACTlJRING (TOLL! S '0 L o o . G e-ij!!lilll!billi!Jili!M~' .... . VERBAL ii'" '\!1M; Freight ,Coll ~. ATTN: R''lCI(Y LEIBY ~ DERA ROAD o LYON STA110NPA 19536 iT o , \' ' DESCRIPTION' 5186113 4,"Wl,UU 4;: LbGISTICS , .( RECEIVED BY _ _ _ _ _~===:;;::-;==---~----'-~ NAME (PLEASE PRINT) SALES DEPT DATI ·.~ €XIDJ I' (STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING SHOAT FORM) TECHNdLOGIE ORIGINAL· NOT NEGOTIABLE RECEIVED, subJeot to the olasslflcatlons apd lawfully'llied tariffs_In effect on the dale of the-Issue 01 this Blil of lading, the property described below, In apparent good order, except as noted (contents and conditt contents of packages unknown), marked, consigned, arid destln_sd as Indicated below, which said oarrier (the word carrier being understood Ihrouihout this contract as meaning any person or corporatton In pcss the proparty und.er the contract agrees tQ_.oa~ry to Its usual place of dS.IiVery at said deStlnation.; ,If on ItS. route, othSlW.isa 1.0 deliver to another carr ar on the routa 01 said destination. !t Is mutually agreed, as to sa of all or any said property over ail' or an¥,portlon of said route to destination, as to each partY at any time interested In all or any of said property, that every service 10 be performed hereunder shall be subject to all the terms and conditions of :the Uniform Domestic Straight Btll of I~_dlng set forth (1) jn Official, Southern, Western and illinois Freight Classtffcatlons In effect on the date hereof, If this Is a rali or a rail-water shl or (2) In the applicable motor carrler clas,SlllcatI6n'or tariff If this III a mptor-carrler shlpment. Slilpper hereby certifies that Ife is famtllar with all other terms and conditions of the said Bill of Lading, Including those back hereof, set forth in the classWcation of ta,rlff which governs the transportation of this shipment, and the said terms and conditions are hereby agreed to by the shipper and accepted for himself and his assign 5HIGl13 Shipperjs No, DATE _=-:-::-:--:--=-=-==-==:=-::,--_____-"'0.,,2.;..1.,,2"'G'-.- 20 .-!L BY RAIL LOGISTICS Carrier Carrier's No. Agent's No, SCAC FROM: TO: CONSIGN EE _...!E~A~8'!.J'i7-:-2.p-,E",::N""N:,:::,:M7':A7N"CU<;F~A;>;C::!.T:::l,,-,'R,.."I.....N",C,<...'-,C""Tc::O,..L""L"".I'-. SHIPPER _~L""O~S~'",A..!!N;7;G;;;E=.-:L~E7S"-..:#'T.2S9,",9~(:-,R,-;C,""Y~),"=", 2700 SOUTH INDIANA STREET STREET_~....DA~T~TN~:=!2-R:=-H:;.:O'c'(Y!-:-L,,-E~17BY-,---:;-=:;:-;:-_-,-_ STREET CA ZIP 90023 ANGELES DESTINATION LYON STATION PA ZIP-,1=-9=-5=3.::oG_ __ BOX 3G971 iI Received $ to apply In prepayment of the charges on the property described hereon. FREIGHT CHARGES o deola.red value of the property Is hereby speolflcalfy staled by the shipper 10 be not exceeding Prepaid Charges Advanced: (The signature here acknowledges only the amount prepaid). Sub]aot 10 Section 7 of Condhlons of applicable blll 01 lading, 1/ this Shipment is to be delivered to the consignee, withe on the oonslgnor, the consignor Shall sign the klilowing'stalement. The carller shall not make delivery of this shipment without payment of f~lght and all othor lawful charges. 1------- P"----~-----";C;;;::;;::c:-;:;===-------­ (Signature of consignor) This Is to Certify that the above named materials are properly cJasslfied \ - - - - - - - - - ' described, packaged, marked, and labeJed and are In proper condition for PLACARDS transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of REQUIRED Transportation and the Commandant of the Coast Guard. \-----------, SHIPPER. EX IDE TECHNOLOG IES $ [}bOliecl Agent or Cashier 1'1 • If the shipment mOV9$ j:letwean two p"rts liy II ca.rril1f by water, the law requires that the Bill of lading shall state wh ''carriers or shipper's welghf. NOTE - When \he rate Is dependent on value, shippers are required to state speclflcsll) the agreed or declared value of the prr~?V~~~====== ____ D~E __==_ _ _- - -__~________________ •_ _ ____ -ExtOE. TECHN;OI,.;OG)'E~ OS ANGELES S ~ b 'T ~299 EAST PENN MANUFACTURING (TOLLI ATTN: RIC1(Y LEIBY DEKA ROAD" LYON STATION PA 19536 '0 I S H I EAST PE:NN MANUFACTURING (TOLL! ~ ATTN: 'RICI(Y LEIBY ~ DEKA ROAD P LYON STATlON pA 19536 " 'T o i 5186114 .•r _ mijillMml$MliWiRil t "~.$.'. 02/15/11'_ ~i_. • ..ItI_iII ' '1 l~AL .'. ._ rrx1'WiW'' Mr0ri;t:'7r'!t;; Co l'i r*"Wi i i i i i _ (RAIL LOGISTICS ,'". '"1_.... eiJMUM1•. _ CPAA 207af,8 RECEIVED BY -~--------,=-c=-=:-=-=-=-=-==-----L-NAME (PLEASE PRINT) - . - --- - .-~--- SALES DEPT. DATE (STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING - SHQRT FORM) ~XIDE. TECHNOLOGIEt: ORIGINAL ·,NOT NEGOTIABLE RECEIVED, subject to the classifications and lawlully flied tariffs 10 effect on the dale ofcthe Issue of this Bill of Lading, the property descrlbed'below, In apparent good order, except as noled (contents and condltlor contents of pacRages unknownl' marked, consltmsd, and.destl.!)sd as ,Indicated beloW,_Whlch !;laid carrier (th,e word carrier being understood throughout this contract as meaning any person or oorporatlon In posss.; the property under the con,trae,,t, "gre,as to carfY to Its usual plac,9;of delivery fit said dss:t1nai!on, If on Its rotlte, otherwise to denver to another carrier on the route 0,' said deS,tlnatlOn.lt Is mU,tuall Y agreed as to sacr of all or any sald-propsrty over all or any portion of said route-Io 'destination, as to each' party at any time Inler.ested In all or any of said property, that every selVlca'to ba performed hereunder shall-be subject to \III the terms and conditions of .the Uniform Domestic_Straight Bill of 'lading set forth (1) in Official, Southern, Western and Illinois Freight Classlfloations In effect on the date liereof, If this is it rail or a rall,water shipr or (2) In Ihe applicable motor carrier cl'lsstilcallon or tariff ff this is a motorocarrler.shlpment. Shipper herebY'certlfles that he Is lamillarwith all other terms ahd conditions of Ihe seld Bill 01 Lading Including those or back hereol, set forth In th-e classification of tariff which governs the transportation of this shipment, and the said terms and conditions are hereby agreed to by the shipper and accepted for himself and his assigns. DATE __~~~~~~~__________~~O~2~/~2~6__ 2Q~ BY RAIL LOGISTICS Carrier SCAC j 1 5186114 Shipper's No, Carrier's No. Agent's No. TO: FROM: __ __ LOS ANGELES #299 (RCY) CONSI GNEE __"",E".,A",S""TL..,-P",E,:"N,:"N,:-'-,-:J1,:='A:"N,;,l":'F::-:A;,:C:,:'T,:-,l,,,1R",'I..".N""E",-;~( i 0 LL..L SHIi>PER 2700 SOUTH INDIAN~ STRE~E~T~_ STREET ____,--LAuT,JTc!:N!..!:'-,-,JR:",I!c!C""I~(Y.L-L""",E~I,,:,Bc.!,Y__-.-::-=-::c-::-_ STREET CA ZIP 90023 DESTINATION LYON STATION PA ZIP 19536 ORIGIN LOS ANGELES CPAA 207358-----ROUTE ________- _____.,.,-~_ _ _ _ _ _~___ CAR OR VEH. INIT, _ _ _ _~ " . ',' PACMGES DESCRIPTION OF ARTICLES, SPECIAL MARKS and EXCEPTiONS FIlEIGHT CHARGES Received $ to apply In prepayment of the charges on the property described hereon. O'pre)lEtld 1Y01lec~ Charges Advanced: Agent or DATE EX IDE TECHNOLOGIES ail! P-:z./",~~ SubJeot \0 Section 7 01 Conditions of applicable bill of lading, If this shipment Is to be delivered to Ihe consignee without I con~lgnor, the consIgnor shall sign the following statement, The carrlar shall not make delivery 0/ \hl~ shipment without payment of freight and all other lawful chargee. $_-------- This Is to Certify that the above named materials are properly classified described, packaged, marked, and labeled ,and are In propar condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Deparlment 01 Transportation and the Commandant of the Coast Guard. SHIPPER ___ f'ER po< on the Cashl~r (The signature here acknowledges only the amount prepaid). • If the shipment moves beiween two ports by a oarrler by waler, Ihe law requires thai the 8111 of lading shall state whelh :h:r~~~:adr ~rh~.fcj::e~~I~:,~?~Ep~~~~~.~h~~~~se~e~endent on value, shippers are requl~et;llo slale speoifically In declared value of the property Is hereby speclfloally stated by the ahlpper to be not exceeding $ _ _ _ _ _ _ •_ _ _ _ __ ~'" 1'2--, '2_' , . - / " PLACARDS REQUIRED PLACARDS SUPPLIED DYES D Driver Signature i,Ll CARRIER -f'ER DATE NO, furnished by Drive Attachment 7 Department of Toxic Substances Control Linda S. Adams Acting Secretary for Environmental Protection Leonard E. Robinson Acting Director 9211 Oakdale Avenue Chatsworth, California 91311-6505 Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor SUMMARY OF VIOLATIONS On February 28, and March 2, 3, and 7, 2011, the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), California Environmental Protection Agency, conducted an inspection at: Facility Name: Exide Technologies Facility Address: 2700 South Indiana Street Los Angeles. California, 90058 EPA ID Number: CAD 097 854 541 County: Los Angeles As a result of this inspection, violations of hazardous waste laws, regulations, and requirements listed on the attached pages were discovered. All violations must be corrected; the actions you must take to correct the violations are listed with each violation. If you disagree with any of the violations or proposed corrective actions listed in this Summary of Violations, you should inform DTSC. Additional violations may be found after the site visit. and these will be identified in the Violation section of the inspection report. DTSC will provide you a complete inspection report within 65 days of the date of this inspection. You may request a meeting with DTSC to discuss the inspection, inspection report, or the Summary of Violations. The issuance of this Summary of Violations does not preclude DTSC from taking administrative, civil, or criminal action as a result of the violations noted in the Summary of Violations or violations that have not been corrected within the time provided. A false statement that compliance has been achieved is a violation of the law and punishable by a fine of not less than $2,000 or more than $25,000 for each occurrence. DTSC may re-inspect this facility at any time. 8,-S6 Representative Signature Title Hazardous Substance Scientist Date 3/7/2011 @ Printed on Recycled Paper DTSC (JANUARY 21.2011) Page 101 _ _ Department of Toxic Substances Control 9211 Oakdale Avenue Chatsworth, California 91311-6505 SUMMARY OF VIOLATIONS Facility Name: Exide Technologies Date: 3/7/2011 SECTION I: NON - MINOR VIOLATIONS AND REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTION (Violations not considered Minor Violations) You must correct the following violation(s) within the specified time frame for each violation. 1. Health and Safety code, section 25201 Exide (the facility) violated Health and Safety Code, section 25201 on or about February 28, 2011, to wit: the facility illegally stored 30 drums of lead dross that they received from off-site in an unauthorized area. The facility stored 30 drums of lead dross on the loading dock next to their rail spur. Corrective Action: The facility representative gave me copies of the manifest that accompanied the 30 drums of lead dross. The manifest showed that the facility received the 30 drums on the morning of February 28, 2011 prior to my inspection. The facility removed the drums from the loading dock and placed them in storage bin area 105. On March 7, 2011, I revisited the loading dock and there were no drums being stored on the area. ----- -------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DTSC (JANUARY 21,2011) Page_ _ of _ _ Department of Toxic Substances Control 9211 Oakdale Avenue Chatsworth, California 91311-6505 SUMMARY OF VIOLATIONS / Facility Name: Exide Technologies Date: 31712011 SECTION IV: OTHER ISSUES/CONCERNS The following issues/concerns were identified during this inspection. Further research may identify additional violations. Any new violations, with the required corrective action and compliance schedule, will be identified in the Violation section of the inspection report. The facility removed a hazardous waste acid tank from the Waste Water Treatment Plant. Mr. Mopas stated that after the foundation underneath the tank is repaired, a new tank will be installed. Exide did not give OTSC prior notification that the tank was going to be removed. Although Exide is not a permitted facility and presently operates under ISO, I need to determine if the removal of the tank still requires a permit modification. If so, Exide is required to provide prior notification to OTSC, and receive authorization from OTSC before the modification could be implemented. DTSC (JANUARY 21. 2011) Page,_ _ of _ _ April 01, 2011 Juliet Tabajoncla Depaliment of Toxic Substances Control Environmental Chemistry Laboratory 700 Heinz Avenue, Ste 100 ELAP No,: 1838 NELAP No,: 02107CA CSDLACNo.: 10196 Berkeley, CA 94710 ORELAP No.: CA300003 TEL: (510) 540-3746 FAX: (510) 540-2305 WorkorderNo.: 116717 RE: 10AT0161 Enclosed are the results for sample(s) received on March 07. 2011 by Advanced Technology Laboratories. The sample(s) are tested for the parameters as indicated in the enclosed chain of custody in accordance with the applicable laboratory certifications. Thank you for the opportunity to service the needs of your company. Please feel free to call me at (562)989-4045 if! Can be of further assistance to your company. Sincerely, -L ~ .. Eddie F. Rodriguez LaboratOlY Director The cove.f letter and the case narrative are an integral part of this analytical report and cannot be reproduced in part or t11 its entirety without written perrllissiol1 from the client and Advanced Technology Laboratories. 3275 Walnut Avenue Signal Hill. CA 90755 Tel: 562 989~4{}45 Fax: 562 989·4040 Advanced Technoloe:v Laboratories CLIENT: ProJect: Department of Toxic Substances Control Lab Order: 116717 10AT0161 Date: Ol-Apr-ll CASE NARRATIVE Sample Receiving/General Comments I. All sample containers were received intact with proper chain of custody documentation. 2. Infonnation on sample receipt conditions including discrepancies can be found in attached Sample Receipt Checklist F onn. 3. Sample preservation was verified upon receipt of samples, if applicable. 4. All samples were analyzed within method holding times. Page 2 of 16 lldl'llll(wi TC'c/}If(}/()!1.'· Lllborl1l(1rfe,~ 1275 WllfImt /1 venue. SiJ.:lla/ flill, CA 90755 Tel: 50]. Q89.4045 Fax: 5fiJ.989.404fJ Advanced Technology Laboratories Date: Ol-Apr-ll CLIENT: Project: Lab Order: Department of Toxic Substances Control Contract No: 08-T3623 Lab Sample lD Client Sample lD Work Order Sample Summary IOATOl61 116717 Matrix Collection Date . Date Received Date Reported 116717-001A RWM31712011iA Liquid, Aqueous 31712011 11:25:00 AM 31712011 411/2011 116717-002A RWM317120112A Liquid, Aqueous 31712011 11 :25:00 AM 31712011 411/2011 116717-003A RWM317120113A Liquid, Aqueous 31712011 11:25:00 AM 31712011 411/2011 I 16717 -004A RWM317120114A Liquid, Aqueous 317120 I I II :25 :00 AM 317120 II 411/2011 116717-005A RWM317120115A Liquid, AqLleous 31712011 II :25:00 AM 31712011 4/112011 116717-006A RWM317120116A Liquid, AqlleoLls 31712011 11 :25 :00 AM 31712011 411/2011 ------.~--~ .. 1dvilllCrJd n'rllllology Lllbo}"llhlri(!s Page I of I 3275 rVafllflt A\I<~!l{./e, c)'lgllalllill.. C1 f)075S Tel: 562. 989.4{J4S Fax; SfI],Y89.4fNO ANALYTICAL RESULTS Advanced Technology Laboratories . Print Date: Ol-Apr-I I CLIENT: Department of Toxic Substances Control Lab Order: 116717 Project: IOATOl61 116717-001A Lab 10: Client Sample ID: RWM317120111A Collection Date: 31712011 11 :25:00 AM Matrix: LIQUID, AQUEOUS .~~-- Result Analyses --- .--~.----- MOL PQL OF Qual Units Date Analyzed lep METALS EPA 6010B EPA 3010A RunlD: ICP8_110311A Antimony QC Batch: 3/10/2011 PrepDate: 71442 0.0050 mg/L Analyst: IL 3111/201110:47 AM 0.026 0.0020 Arsenic 0.0061 0.0040 0.010 mg/l 3111/2011 10:47 AM Barium 0.089 0.00026 0.0030 mg/L 3111/201110:47 AM NO 0.00028 0.0030 mg/L 3111/201110:47 AM 0.00032 0.036 69 0.0010 0.0010 NO 0.00036 0,023 . 0.00098 0.36 0.022 0.00081 0.56 0.025 0.00052 0.30 0.00041 0.0030 mg/L . 3/11/201110:47 AM Beryllium 0.026 Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Manganese Molybdenum 0.50 mglL 3/11/2011 10:47 AM 0.0030 mgfL 3/11/201110:47 AM 0.0030 mg/L 3111/2011 10:47 AM 0.0050 mg/L 3111/2011 10:47 AM 0.50 mg/L 3111/201110:47 AM 0.0050 mg/L 3111/201110:47 AM 0.50 mg/L 3111/201110:47 AM 0.0050 mg/L 3111/201110:47 AM 0.013 13.9 0.00086 0.0050 mg/L 3111/20111047 AM U,0(9 0,50 mg/L 3/11/201101.26 PM 0.0066 0.0057 0.010 3111/2011 10:47 AM Silver NO 0.00084 0.0030 Sodium 220 0.12 1.0 Thallium NO NO 0.0016 0.015 mg/L mg/L mg/L rng /L 0.00043 0.0030 mg/L 3111/201110:47 AM 0.0021 0.010 mgfL 3/11/201110:47 AM Nickel Potassium Seleniufill Vanadium Zinc 0.31 3111/201110:47 AM 3111/2011 01 :26 PM 3111/201110:47 AM PH EPA 9040B RunlO' WETCHEM_110307E QC Batch ---~ Qualifiers: 13 H NO 0.10 Analyst: eBB PrepDate' R130716 94 pH pH Units. 0.10 3/712011 - - - - - - ---- Value above quantitation range Analyle detected in the associated Method Blank Holding times tor preparation or analysis exceeded E J Analyte detected below quantitation limits Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limi ts dlle to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO SUlTogate Diluted Out Advllllced Ter/wo/ay)' fAiiJor'ltoricii 3275 Wal!l/lt Avenue, Sigllal Hif/. CA Q{)755 Tel: 562. 989.41145 Fax: SiI],989.404{) ANALYTICAL RESULTS Advanced Technology Laboratories Print Date: Of-Apr-!! CLIENT: Department of Toxic Substances Control Lab Order: 116717 Project: Lab Client Sample 10: RWM317120 112A Collection Date: 31712011 Matrix: LIQUID, IOATOl61 !D: 11:25:00 AM AQUEOUS 116717'OO2A .---------- Analyses Result MOL ~~ -~~--- ---~--------- PQL -~~----.-"-~.------ OF Qual Units Date Analyze\1 ICP METALS EPA 3010A RunlD: ICP8_110311A Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium . Cadmium Calcium Chromium EPA 6010B QC Batch: 3111/2011 10:50 AM 3111/2011 10:50 AM 0.0030 0.00028 0.0030 mg/L 3/11/20111Q:50AM 0031 0.00032 0.0030 mg/L 74 0,0022 0.036 0.50 mg/L 3/11/201110:50AM 3111/2011 1050 AM 0.0010 0.0030 mg/L 3/11/201110:50AM NO 0.00036 0.0030 mg/L 3111/2011 10:50 AM 0026 0.00098 0,022 0.0050 mg/L 3/111201110:50AM 0.50 mg/L 3111/2011 10:50 AM 0.0050 0.0083 0.0040 0.010 0.097 0.00026 NO Lead Manganese Molybdenum Nickel Analyst: IL mg/L mg/L 0.0020 0.62 Iron 3/10/2011 mg/L 0.035 Cobalt Copper PrepDate: 71442 J 3111/2011 10:50 AM 1.0 0,00081 0.0050 mgfL 3/11/2011 1050 AM 0.043 0.00052 0.50 mg/L 311112011 10:50 AM 0.33 0.00041 0.0050 mg/L 3111/2011 10:50 AM 0.015 8.9 0.00086 0.079 0.0050 mg/L 3/11/201110:50AM 0.00 mgfL 3/11/2011 01 :28 PM 0.0057 0.010 mg/l 3111/2011 10:50 AM Silver NO NO 0.00084 0.0030 mg/L 3/11/201110:50AM Sodium 220 0.12 1.0 mglL 3/11/2011 01 :28 PM Thallium NO NO 0.0016 0,015 mg/L 3111/2011 1050 AM 0.00043 0.0030 mg/L 3/11/201110:50AM 0.37 0.0021 0.010 mg/L 3/11/201110:50AM Potassium Selenium Vanadium Zinc PH EPA 9040B RunlD: WETCHEM_l10307E QC Batch: pH PrepDate: R130716 9.4 0.10 Analyst: CBB _I pH Units 0.10 3/7120H - - - - - -~~~~-~~-c~~~c-c----~-~~~-~:----------- Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ;-.JD Not Detected llt the Reporting Limit Results al"e weI unless otherwise specified E J 5; DO Value above ClLlantitatioll range Analyte detected below qllflntitalion limits SIJike"Surrognte outside of Ill11its due to Illulnx illlei"lercilce Surrogate Diluted Out ,1r/v,1f)('od Tl'cillloiogy LJ)/)Ol'fltories 3275 IVa/nllt A venue, Signal Hill, C,l 9tJ755 Tel: 562. 989.4045 Fax: 562.989.41!40 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Advanced Technology Laboratories CLIENT: Print Date: Ol-Apr-II Client Sample JD: RWM317120113A Department of Toxic Substances Control Lab Order: 116717 Project: 10AT0161 Lab JD: 116717-003A Collection Date: 31712011 II :25:00 AM Matrix: LIQUID, AQUEOUS Analyses Result MDL Qual Units PQL DF Date Analyzed lep METALS EPA 3010A RunlO: ICP8_""03""A EPA 6010B QC Batch: 0.027 0.0070 0.091 Beryllium NO Cadmium 0.Q28 0.025 0.33 0.56 0.029 0.31 0.00052 0.00041 0.014 8.7 0.00086 0.079 0.0057 0.00084 0.12 0.0016 0.00043 0.0021 0.0011 NO Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Manganese Molybdenum Nickel PotassiUm NO NO Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium 210 0.0016 NO Vanadium Zinc 0.0020 0.0040 0.00026 0:00028 0.00032 0.036 0.0010 0.00036 0.00098 0.022 0.00081 71 Calcium Chromium PrepDate: 71442 Antimony Arsenic Barium 0.34 3/10/2011 Analyst: IL 0.0050 0.010 0.0030 mg/L 3/11/201110:54AM mg/L 311112011 10:54 AM mg/L 31111201110:54AM 0.0030 0.0030 0.50 0.0030 0.0030 mg/L. 3f1112011 10:54 AM mg/L 311112011 1054 AM 3111/2011 10:54 AM mg/L J 31111201110:54AM 31111201110:54AM 311112011 10:54 AM 3/111201110:54AM 3/1112011 10:54 AM 3/11/201110:54AM 31111201110:54AM mgfL mg/l mg/L 0.0050 0.50 0.0050 J mg/l mgiL 0.50 0.0050 0.0050 mg/L mg/L 311112011 10:54 AM 0.50 mg/L 311112011 01 :29 PM 0.010 0.0030 mg/L 3/111201110:54AM mg/L 3111/2011 10:54 AM 1.0 0.015 0.0030 0.010 mg/L 311112011 01 :29 PM mg/L mg/L mglL 31111201110:54AM 311112011 10:54 AM 311112011 1054 AM mg/l PH EPA 9040B RuniD: pH WETCHEM.J 1 0307E QC Batch: ~ R130716 9.4 0.10 PrepDate: - -- O~ 10 - ~ Analyst: eBB __ 1 pH Units- _ 3/712011 ~ ~~---~--~.---~-~-- Qualifiers: B !\11;]lyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range [-I Ho[ding limes ror preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantftalion limits Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S NO Reslllts are wct unless otherwise specified DO Spikc/SulTogatc outside 0 f limits due to matrix interference SlllTogate Diluted Out f1d"!1lf(,(,(/ Trr/JJJ%,f/.1 LuiJof'lItories Tel: 561, 989 ../045 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Advanced Technology Laboratories CLIENT: Department of Toxic Substances Cant,ral Lab Order: 116717 Project: IOATOl61 Lab 10: 116717-004A Print Date: Ol-Apr-I I Client Sample 10: RWM317120114A Collection Date: 317120 II II :25:00 AM Matrix: LIQUID, AQUEOUS ....._ - - - - - - - Analyses Result MDL OF Qual Units PQL Date Analyzed ICP METALS EPA 3010A RunlD: ICP8_110311A EPA 6010B OC Batch: 71442 Arsenic 0.035 0.0098 Barium 0.10 Antimony Beryllium NO Cadmium 0.034 78 0.0031 Calcium 0.0050 0.010 0.0030 0.00028 0.00032 0.036 0.0030 0.C030 Iron 0.028 0.64 0.0010 0.00036 0.00098 0.022 Lead 0,97 0.00081 Chromium NO Cobalt Copper Molybdenum 0.037 0.35 Nickel O.OIB Manganese Potassium 8.8 Selenium NO NO Silver 220 0.0018 SOdium Thallium NO Vanadium 0.42 Zinc 0.00052 0.00041 0.00086 0.079 0.0057 0.00084 0.12 0.0016 0.00043 00021 311012011 PrepDat8' 0.0020 0.0040 0.00026 J Analyst Il mg/L 3/111201110:57AM mg/L 3/11/201110:57 AM mg/l 3/11/201110:57 AM mg/L 3/11/201110:57 AM 3/11/2011 10:57 AM 0.50 mg/l mg/l 0,0030 mg/L 0.0030 0.0050 0.50 00050 0.50 0.0050 mg/L mg/l mg/L 3/11/201110:57 AM 3/11/201110:57 AM 3/11/201110:57 AM ·3/11/201110:57 AM mgfL 3/11/201110:57 AM 3/11/201110'57 AM mg/L 3/1112011 10:57 AM mg/L 3/11/2011 10:57 AM 00050 0.50 0.010 0.0030 mg/L 3/11/201110:57 AM 1.0 0.Q15 0.0030 mg/l 31"11/2011 01 :30 PM mg/L 3/11/201110:57 AM mg/L 3/11/201110:57 AM 0,010 mg/L 3/11/2011 10:57 AM mg/L 3/11/2011 01 :30 PM mg/L 3/111201110:57 AM mgfL 3/11/201110:57 AM PH EPA 9040B RunlD: WETCHEM_110307E QC Batch: pH Qualifi~L~: PrepDate" R130716 0 !-I NO Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Holding times lor preparation or analysis exceeded Not Detected at the RepOI"ting Limit Results are wet unless otherwise specified r1dYII11Ced Technology LJiiJorJJtorics Analyst: CBB -- pH Units ---- _____ 1 9.4· - -0.10 _3171201.1_ l:: Vallie above quantitation r"ange J Analyle detected below qual1titation limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix illterterence DO Sunogate Dillllcd Out 3175 Walnllt Avefll.le. Signal Hifl. CA 9{)7j5 Tel: 562. 989.4IJ45 Fax: 5fi2" 989.40 Ad'":Jm~d J("{/.r,,!k,i'.1 - - L h~ ~.u oniforN."< I ,;:-" 11 IJ!Ml!AH!,llIt! I \1.;;1,',/ 1/1 ( 1 • E Holding tImes for preparation or analysis exceeded RPD outside accepted recovery limits CalculatIOns are based on raw values F:.:. ii'll '.is'}. .ffl.lll Qual CLIENT: Department of Toxic Substa1iCes Control Work Order: 116717 Project: IOAT0161 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT ! Sample 10 116717~006A~DUP Client 10 RWM3f7f20116A TestCode: DU1 I SampType: TestCode: 6010_W Batch 10' 71442 TestNo: EPA 6010B I Redult Analyte SPK value Units: mg/L EPA 3010A %REC Prep Date: 3/10/2011 Run No: 130941 Analysis Date: 311112011 SeqNo: 2131423 RPO Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit 0.0050 2.001 0.440 0.50 0.0050 0.03756 0 1_65 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 PQL SPK Ref Va! 6010 W LowLimit HighLimit Qual I '~92 37 Lead Manganese a. Molybdenum 0.358 0.3636 NIckel 0~'6 0.0050 0.01630 SelenIum 09 06 0.010 0.007142 ~o ~D 0.0030 0 0 0 1.70 0 0 0 0 0.4699 2.09 Silver Thallium NO 0.~60 ! Vanadium Zinc Sample 10 116717~006A-MS Client 10: RWM3f7120116A SampType: MS I 0.015 0.0030 0_010 TestCode: 6010_W Batch [D· 71442 TestNo: EPA 6010B Units: mg/L EPA 3010A ReL[t I PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val Antimony 2~49 0.0050 2.500 0.05917 Arsenic 2.633 2d71 0.010 2.500 0.01470 0.0030 2.500 0.1019 0.0030 2.500 0 0.03839 Analyte 'ljoREC Beryllium I 2.q39 Cadmium 2.552 0_0030 2.500 0.50 20.00 71.98 108 105 103 106 101 102 2_500 0.003057 97.1 2.500 0 0.03263 104 109 106 99.3 102 104 103 101 108 Barium I 9~j:~ Calcium Chromium , 0.0030 Cobalt 2.590 0.0030 Copper 2,1 59 0.0050 2.500 1mn 22.342 0.50 20.00 1.089 Lead 4482 0.0050 2.500 2.001 0.50 20.00 0.0-3756 2'1 2.600 0.0050 2.500 0.3636 0_0050 2.500 0.01630 0.010 2.500 0.007142 0.0030 2.500 0 I I 20.456 I 63 Manganese Molybdenum Nickel I 2.527 Selenium I 2jDS Silver Qualifiers: B I In the associated Method Blank . RunNo: 130941 SeqNo: 2131424 LowUmit HighLimit 73 128 121 118 119 117 168 115 118 127 79 82 84 79 37 78 80 81 RPD Ref Val %RPO RPOLimit 133 69 80 74 81 78 118 121 118 120 120 125 78 79 Analyte ddected below quantitatlOn ltmlts S Splke'S","g," ,""id, of limi" doe '" AA, --_. . . . - --_. -.:-..-....f--",fwTlI/(JnN' Value above qLlantllation range H Holdmg times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Ltmit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits DO Surrogate Diluted Out E 1 J . td.OlflCe-d 1 cc!uw/og., ~~ 3/10/2011 3/11/2011 ! Analvte detected • ~~ Prep Date: Analysis Date: I "'1"" in,,,k"nec Calcuhlllons are based on raw values I 3::7) 1<1-"0/1/1" .1t·ell'''---'1 "IXIJIlI Illlf. (' . ! i '11;755 Tel: .if/2. 'IS" -I-f).J5 FiI.I. "(~:: '}Ny ·UNO J J Qual - ----_ _. --'·'-T-------.--.--._------CLIENT: Department of Toxic Substrlnces Control 116717 I Work Order: Project: IOATOl61 I ... Sample ID 116717-006A-MS Client to: RWM3f7120116A SampType: Msi -.----~,----~--- ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: 6010_W TestCode: 6010_W Batch 10: 714rZ TestNo: EPA 6010B Units: mg/L EPA 3010A %REC 102 74 115 84 119 75 122 SPK value SPK Ref Val Thallium 2·f49 2.657 0.015 2.500 0 0.0030 2.500 0 0.010 2.500 0.4699 99.8 Sample to 116717-006A-MSD Client 10 RWM3/7120116A SampType: MSD TesiCode: 6010_W Batch 10: 71442 TestNo: EPA 6010B Units: mg/L EPA 3010A Re~ult POL SPK value SPK Ref Val Antimony 2.120 0 ..0050 2.500 0.05917 Arsenic 2.b3 0.010 2.500 0.01470 Barium 2.642 0.0030 2.500 0.1019 Beryllium 2.616 2.b2 0.0030 2.500 2.500 o 0.0030 0.03839 Analyte I I Cadmium 93.~10 Calcium SeqNo: 2131424 106 PQL 2_.~66 Run No: 13D941 3/11[2011 HighLimit Rekult , Zinc 3/10/2011 LowLlmit Anatyte Vanadium Prep Date: Analysis Date: %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLlmit Prep Date: 3110/2011 RunNo: 130941 Analysis Date: 3/11/2011 Seq No: 2131425 LowLlmit HighLimit RPO Ref Val %RPD RPDLlmit 106 73 128 2.749 79 121 2.633 1.08 0.37-g 20 104 102 82 118 2.671 '-09 20 105 99.8 84 119 2.639 0.888 79 117 2.552 0.761 20 20 20 2.1 00 0.50 20.00 71.98 107 37 168 92.37 1.12 20 Chromium 0.0030 2.500 0.003057 95.9 78 2A30 1.25 20 Cobalt 2.564 0.0030 2.500 o 103 80 115 118 2.590 0.995 20 Copper 2.719 0.0050 2.500 0.03263 107 81 127 2.759 1.45 20 Iron 22.p98 0.50 20.00 1.089 105 69 133 22.34 1.10 20 Lead 4.(47 0.0050 102 101 118 121 4.482 0.50 2.001 0.03756 80 20rO 2_(33 2.573 2.500 20.00 20.46 1.44 1.30 20 20 0.0050 2.500 0.3636 103 81 118 2.963 1.01 20 0.0050 2.500 0.01630 102 78 120 2.600 1.03 20 Selenium 2.k13 0.010 2.500 0.007142 100 78 120 2.527 0_533 20 Sliver 2'f66 0.0030 2_500 125 20 0.015 2.500 74 115 2.706 2_549 1.49 2.(45 107 102 79 Thallium 0.174 20 Vanadium ~:~~ 0.0030 2.500 o o o 105 84 119 2.657 1.35 20 0_010 2.500 0.4699 99.5 75 122 2.966 0284 20 I Manganese Molybdenum Nickel I Zinc 74 I I , Qualifiers' B I Analylt: detected III the asSOCiated Method Blank E Analyto: deleded belov. quamltatlOn Itmlts l~ S l Spike <>urrogate outside ofhmlts due to matnx lnlerference ld, unn:U 7 ,>dm';-/(~g,> L~/"'nll"rie~' '">7-Wf l ' , - " "flU ,. ND DO Value above quantitatlOn range H Not Detected at the Reporting LImit R Surrogate Diluted Out "~.. t, '-'1 ,--. 9f;~-- - y) 'i'd' 561. (jH'J.-l-O.J5 RPD outside accepted recovery limits Calculations are based on raw values I elI"'! .Iii""1ff'! Holdmg tnnes for preparation ru- analysIs exceeded rtf, :;1>2_ Y,'N m-l-O Qual Qual ----'----------- CLIENT: Department of Toxic Substarces Control Work Order: 116717 Project: 10AT0161 Sample 10 MB-71442 Client 10- -~-- ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT II TestCode: I T SampType: MBLK Batch 10 PBW 71 TestCode: 6010_W ~2 Units: mg/L TestNo: EPA 6010B EPA 3010A 6010 W Prep Date: 3/10/2011 RunNo: 130958- Analysis Date: 3/1112011 SeqNo: 2131659 I Re~u!t Analyte SPK value PQL SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual , [PARAMETER2] ~D [PARAMETER2] ND 0.50 1.0 I , Sample 10 LCS-71442 Client 10' SampType: LC!:) LCSW Batch 10 TestNo: EPA 6010B I Analyte [PARAMETER2] [PARAMETER2J Units: mg/L TestCode: 6010_W 71442 EPA 3010A Result , PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val ~~i:~ 0.50 1.0 20.00 20_00 o o I %REC 90.7 103_ Prep Date: 3/1012011 Run No: 130958 Analysis Date: 3/11/2011 SeqNo: 2131660 LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit 85 85 115 115 Prep Date: 3/1012011 Run No: 130958 Analysis Date: 3/11/2011 SeqNo: 2131667 Qual , Sample 10 116717-006A-OUP Client 10: SampType' DU~ RWM3/7/20116A Batch 10: IAnalyte TestCode: 6010_W TestNo: EPA 6010B 7112 Result , PQL 9.ill85 Potassium Sample 10 116717-006A-MS SampType' RWM3/7/20116A Batch 10: Analyte Potassium Sodium Msi RPDLimit 0.50 9.083 0.0249 1.0 221.3 0.528 20 20 TestCode: 6010_W 71t2 SPK value SPK Ref Val 26.~23 0.50 20.00 9.083 243.952 1.0 20.00 221.3 I Sample 10 116717-006A-MSD SampType: Batch lO: RWM3n/20116A Analyte EPA 3010A PQL T MSD TestCode: 6010_W 71t2 %REC 89_2 113 Units: mg/L TestNo: EPA 6010B Result %REC Units: mg/L TestNo' EPA 6010B Re)'ult --Client 10' SPK Ref Val %RPD 222.1 33 Client 10: SPK value EPA 3010A RPD Ref Val I Sodium Units: mg/L EPA 3010A PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val 0.50 20_00 9.083 %REC I LowLimit HighLimit Prep Date: 3/10/2011 Run No: 130958 Analysis Date: 3/1112011 SeqNo: 2131668 LowLlmit HighLimit 70 70 130 130 RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Prep Date: 3/10/2011 Run No: 130958 Analysis Date: 3/11/2011 Seq No: 2131669 LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit 70 130 26.92 3.46 20 , Potassium 26.II)07 _--.-1 _ _ _ __ Qualifiers I B Analyte detected In the associated Method IBlank J Analyte detected below quantltatloll limits S Spike/Surrogate outside oflllnits due to td~'If"-'ed-TecitJW/()f!) - --- .. _-- 846 L.~tlOr:llar(e-s. ;:~, II ',i' rn3InX I , \l"llfli '" H Not Detected at the Reporting Limil R DO Surrog.ate Diluted Out E Interference I ut l1R1I1-I1' Value above quantitation range ND Ifill C'A <)IF55 l'ef "6::, r;Sl),PI-f5 Holding times for preparation or analYSIS exceeded RPD outside accepted recovery limits CalculatIOns are based on raw values VII.'.;: 5hl !,I"I--1fJ-J{i Qual Qual Qual --------- --Department of Toxic Subst~lces Control ----~~- CLIENT: Work Ordel": 116717 Project: 10AT0161 Sample 10 116717-006A~MSD Client 10' RWM3/7120116A I SampType: MS~ TestCode: 6010~W I TestNo: EPA6010B Batch 10: 714f2 Sodium 236.511 I I .. --.-~.--------- Units: mg/L EPA 3010A PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val 1.0 20.00 221.3 %REC 76.2 6010 W Prep Date: 3/1012011 RunNo' 130958 Analysis Date. 3/1112011 Seq No: 2131669 LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit 70 130 244.0 3.10 20 --T'-- ~ Qualifiers: B s. ,._. ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT Testeode: Result ~ "----~.-----, I Analyte i;~'~ - ~----- S I Analyte detected In the associated MethodlBlank Value above quantlLation range H Analyt<:: detected below quantitarion hmitsl ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R Spike/Surrogate outSide ofhmits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out .,dmc<-d Tf,!F ._," --'--.--:-"'"-"-~ f.JJ.blJ/"!JlIlnlJS ,_~""j I I H nImH AC.t'IHU"1 E Value above quanlnation range H ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R DO Surrogate Diluted Out Si"lml fIill, CA 1}rr55 <> 1~/' :;f;!. IJ/','I./.I/./.' Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded RPD outside accepted recovery limits Calculations are based on raw values }i!::: 56], 'iB'J.·HI,J/} Qual Qual --,-,---- -- "-Dep~ment o~-Toxic SUbst-l-'~~~;-control"------- CLIENT; Work Order: Project: _._. --- 116717~006ADUP Client ID. RWM3f7120116A TestCode: SampType: Batch 10: I DUr R1 0717 1 I Analyte pH Units: pH Units TestCode: 9040_W POL 9-450 0.10 SPK value -~----- Analysis Date: SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit RunNo: 130717 3nJ2011 HighLimit SeqNo: 2126942 RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit 9.450 o 20 Qualifiers: l~ l'vkthOdl Blank Value above quantitation range H J Analyte detected below quanl1tatlOn l1mlts NT! Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R S SpIke/Surrogate outstde of InUIts due to matnx lnterierence DO Surrogate Diluted Out BAnal) te detected 1dl.!lI<:cd Tcchnology -[-7:' - - . - .'h,,,r:J{orre;> In the associated c-, E \,·emIC1.•\'lglllrf fli/f. Col I <)(j"'~ ., rei: ')62. flr.t;;)! g"'QuH method, ME.>. coD€: Ii"" b",w. Pie". ,podt, ell ,ther ["'I"s".) INumber of Sempl<)sITylX I Solid Liquld'W~tar Othl)r 'j Number of ~mpleWTyJe Or.lLanic AnalYsis [Soil, Llqul~Water O(ller Inorganic Analv~i"G GRq. (G.~oline, e015B) DRO(OiOS!I) only (ECl.816-M) M.otor 011 only (ECUl16-M) D~P(ql.~.~I) & MoW all I"ClB16-M1 % DIY SolidI< (ECL7S0o.S) .. Mdl". 1305-1) AlkalinitY (010·1) Anions by IC 190561 ChrGrtllum VI(C~) b~ COlOrimetriC (7100A) ChromIuM VI(C~l in Water by Ie (7199) ~thyl'n'ClI)'W1 (~Cl)72:M) /~ H~rdness (1~O'2) P80E, (EOL750.M) PCBs (8082) PestiCides ~ ChlorinatBd (Me' A) MercufY(Hg) In SoUd::;lind LiquiQ (74~S) Pe,5~j.~r.~es. Or~HanophospI1El!~ (814 lA) Cyanides for Wa::llB'3,LeacMt$~ (90108) 1,4--0iQ;t;ane (ECL830-S) Mercvry(Hg) In (Sem~Sol\d Waste (7471A) GC,MS)S6mlvol 'tile'(~370C) , Mercllry(Hg) In Uquld W~:ua (7470A) Meta-Ie; $cteening ?y XRF Me-Wis· Scan (601 oa. tor As,Ba,c-u,~b, m~) • Malals Scan (tor DrlnKlng wa~i'~ Org-8noLaa,d in Waste (ECL9;:'e-M) p,md, Si., (ECL74Q..S) 5020A) f2:l Cl (otha~, o Metals Mer-evry Voleliles $ernl;,o~1j1,~ (otnE!Nt. Ho"" y[, TXQ. Tot,1 Halogen, in 011 (ECL792·S) it t1!:Pr<"y D C->"r.prdlolol (othero,typli! In) (O~'1e/1j, tYM ii'll AnalY$lz ObJecthre: type. in) • Special ]m;ttuciioOflI pr Comments (ror E;:ample: Oet~ctitin Umlt, Sample Pre-p-aration: ~\n\ction,. , etc.): 03104/11 ... (n,,11Idcllyy) expecWd. Sampla AniYa! ct\to: ARF>I,I R$v~$~?nfo, PART C : (By SMO • Eel) I Authorlzat)Oll Numbilr (AN) - - -- - - - - I Initials: J.!j./ , 1M'1"0181 Lab to Receive sampt\i(S) Sample M.ana:gemen\ Off\~r {SMO) :J.ltv p..dVM(!~d TocJ1nolc>,/y Labs ;:1276 \i\isll"l<.It J~vlry Only If[l~ceu.1rY Onl)' if ne~usl-lry Only Irn~cHslry Other Analysis li:l Do it rallardl~S'! o o o INumber of Samplesffype I Solid ~LlquidlWate~ Other Organic Analysis GRO (Gasoline. 8015B) DRO(Die"l) only (ECL8'6-M) Molor Oil only (ECL816-M) DRO(Die"l) & Molor Oil (ECL81S·M) ElhyleneGlycol iECL772-M) PBDEs (EOL750·M) PCBs (8082) P~sticldes· Chlorinated (80alA) Pes~I.~.K!es .• Or.g.anophosph.ate (8141A) 0 Metals Phone( 818 ) 717-6578 Fax( 818 ) 717-6632 Phone ( 818) 717-6696 EERP Fish Dcitt~gud!Q$$ Bloassa'~ (Titre 22) Congener PC~s (ECL·CG-PCB, Do h r~!:ardl~S$ , C.ong,en~: PBD~s (ECL·CG-PBDE) Oil il r~~afdl.~ (others, type in) . (other::., type in) (others, type in) Analysis Objective: Special Instructions or Comments (For Example' Detection Limit, Sample Preparation, Extraction., . etc.): 03/04/11 Expected Sample Arrival Date: (mm/dd/yy) eAHLC_:_(B¥.SMo.~ECL) ARf!'s R.evlsion No. I Authorlzation Number (AN) 10AT0161 I Initials: Dale: Lab to Receive Sarnple(s) .o..dvancp-d Tecbr,olc,';:1I Labs 3213 \~\Ja\r)lJt /'v'mue ~Q7 ~~ Sample Management Officer (SMO) ~kv .- Ii Sign.?.! H\11, Sf. 99"'" 01:11 I .; A.l't: Diane Sal-,'in 1,562~989-4 .5 ARF's Revision No. Initials: 0 Date: Checi, box if cancelled Initials: Today's Date 03/03111 (mm/ddlyy) Expiration Date 03113/11 Date: (mm/dd/yy) If Sample(s) Directed to Contract Lab, Please Specify: Reason: EeL Contract Lab Manager Notification (for Rush or TAT Level =1): ECL Personnel Confirmed' ...... Tumaround Time [TAT): • Rush for pubhC health and safety ot emergency, ~LllveI1" 15 days, 2 =-30 days, 3 - 45 days, '*TCLP . If time permits and sample matrix type Is appropriate, lab may analyze or screen the sample(s} firstto determine if TCLP Is needed. Reference: ECl User's Manual. ECl01 (REV 01111) Advanced Technology Laboratories Please review.the checklist below. Any NO and/or NA signifies non-compliance. Any non-compliance will be noted and must be understood as having an impact on the quality of the data. All tests will be performed as requested regardless of any compliance issues, If you have any questions or further Instruction, please contact our Project Coordinator at (562) 989-4045. Sample Receipt Checklist Client Name: Date .Tlme Received: DTSC-BERKELEY Work Order Number: 116717 Cooler Temp (Deg C): No cooler Received by: Q_---,--------;\ Checklist completed by: Signature i-- I~I_~ I:=:---, 0", Carrier name: r 317120111:33:00 PM FD Reviewed by: . _0. Initials rl 1 ~~ Walk~ln [J Not Present li21 0 Not Present li21 Not Present li21 1. Shipping container/cooler In good condition? Yes 2. Custody seals Intact on shippping container/cooler? Yes 3. Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes C 0 0 4. Chain of custody present? Yes li21 NoO 5. Sampler's name present in COC? Yes No 6, Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes li21 li21 NoO 7, Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes li21 NoO Yes f21 No g, Sample containers intact? Yes li21 NoO 10. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes li21 NoO 11. All samples received within holding time? Yes 12. Containerrremp Blank temperature within acceptance 11m it? Yes li21 No li21 NA 0 13. Water ~ VOA vials have zero heads pace? Yes 0 0 0 NoO NA 14. Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Example: pH > 12 for (eN,S); pH<2 for Metals Yes [1 NoD NA li21 [-21 8_ Samples in proper ~ontainer/bottle? . No No NoO 0 [l No "-.----~-. -"- Comments: Page 1 of 1 Samples received beyond holding time for pH. -_.. -- ~ -- --- - - -_. --- A' __ _ am??mm 1 1A 11%? 1g 151 l_ i 7-3m? immay?Qw?H??Jh I Warsaw 3 921M Evia?r.? .21: m9 My, EU: 11.~ Nay-3515 - - d- I- (23d II j? ?939?: $453.1: mW .e .m ?m Ip-oz?t?ik.uzwmm Jaw?? - 161?:1mww - 3an 1. i . a - {cum-4W 'mw'?aw ?i mum; il a 1 a "r I 4?11