IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE IN RE: ROBERT LEE VOGEL, BPR #23374 An Attorney Licensed to Practice Law in 'I?ennessee (Knox County) No. MAR -1 9 2015 BOPR No. mark 0, the Courts Rec'd By This matter is before the Court upon a Petition for Discipline ?led against Robert Lee Vogel on July 14, 2014-; upon the Answer to Petition for Discipline ?led on August 4, 2014; upon the Hearing Panel?s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered on January 15, 2015; upon service of the Hearing Panel?s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law upon Mr. Vogel by the Executive Secretary of the Board on January 15, 2015; upon the Agreed Order Amending the Hearing Panel?s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered on February 6, 2015; upon consideration and approval by the Board on February 12, 2015; upon the parties having waived their right to appeal; and upon the entire record in this cause.1 The Agreed Order proposed to suspend Mr. Vogel for one year, with all but thirty days of that suspension to be served on probation. Upon the Court?s review of the Hearing Panel?s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the Agreed Order from the Hearing Panel ?with a View to attaining uniformity of punishment throughout the State and appropriateness of punishment under the circumstances? of this case, we ?nd that the proposed punishment seems inadequate. Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 9 Accordingly, this Court proposes that the punishment should be increased. Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 9, section ?the respondent attorney shall have twenty days from the date of the order to ?le a brief and request oral. argument.? PER CURIAM Lee, C.J., Not Participating 'Because this cause was initiated prior to January i, 2014, it is governed by Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 9 (2006) except as otherwise noted.