I 
APR 2 3 2325

AT 
WILLIAM T. WALSH



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Hon. N.

V.

Crim. No. 15- I 3

WILLIAM E. BARONI, IR. and
BRIDGET ANNE KELLY

18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 371,
1343, 1349, and 2.
INDICTMENT
The Grand Jury, in and for the District of New Jersey, sitting at Newark, charges:
COUNT 1

(Conspiracy to Obtain by Fraud, Knowingly Convert, and Intentionally
Misapply Property of an Organization Receiving Federal Bene?ts)

THE DEFENDANTS

1. During the time period relevant to Count 1 of the Indictment:

A. Defendant WILLIAM E. BARONI, JR. (?defendant was the
Deputy Executive Director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the ?Port
Authority?), its second highest ranking executive. Defendant BARONI was appointed as the
Deputy Executive Director by the Governor of the State of New Jersey, Christopher J. Christie,
in or about February 2010, and served in that position until his resignation on or about December
13, 2013. As the Deputy Executive Director of the Port Authority, defendant BARONI, together
with the Executive Director of the Port Authority (the ?Executive Director?), was responsible for
the general supervision of all aspects of the Port Authority?s business, including the operations of
Port Authority transportation facilities. Defendant BARONI was an agent of the Port Authority,

within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code, Section 666(d)(1). HEREBY ?at ?it  

foregoing is a true and cone-oi and} c?
the original on file in my 
ATTEST - 

WILLIAM T. 
United States District Court
District of New Jerseu



.r - I 
By:   
Deputy Cl .

 

B. Defendant BRIDGET ANNE KELLY (?defendant was an
employee of the Office of the Governor of the State of New Jersey (the ?Governor?s Of?ce?) and
served as Deputy Chief of Staff for Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs from in
or about April 2013 to on or about January 9, 2014. Prior to that appointment, defendant KELLY
was the Director of IGA, reporting to the previous Deputy Chief of Staff for IGA.

OTHER INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES

C. David Wildstein (?Wildstein?) was the Director of Interstate Capital
Projects for the Port Authority and an associate of defendant BARONI and defendant KELLY.
In or about May 2010, defendant BARONI hired Wildstein for his Port Authority position, which
Wildstein held until his resignation from the Port Authority became effective on or about
December 13, 2013. Notwithstanding his title, Wildstein operated as defendant chief
of staff and as the second highest ranking New Jersey executive at the Port Authority. Wildstein
was an agent of the Port Authority, within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code, Section
666(d)(1).

7D. The Port Authority was an organization that operated transportation and
other facilities in New York and New Jersey. The Executive Director of the Port Authority was
appointed by the Governor of New York, and the Deputy Executive Director was appointed by
the Governor of New Jersey. The Port Authority also had a twelve-person Board of
Commissioners, six of whom were appointed by the Governor of New Jersey (including the
Chairperson) and six of whom were appointed by the Governor of New York (including the
Vice-Chairperson).

E. During the period beginning January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013,

the Port Authority received bene?ts in excess of $10,000 under Federal programs involving

grants, contracts, subsidies, loans, guarantees, insurance, or other forms of Federal assistance,
within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 666(b) and 666(d)(5).

F. The George Washington Bridge was a facility owned and
operated by the Port Authority that spanned the Hudson River between the Borough of
Manhattan in New York and the Borough of Fort Lee in New Jersey (?Fort Lee?). The GWB had
both an upper level and a lower level, each of which served both eastbound traf?c into New
York and westbound traf?c into New Jersey. Vehicles traveling eastbound from New Jersey into
New York paid tolls at one of three toll plazas: (1) the lower level toll plaza; (2) the upper level
toll plaza; and (3) the toll plaza for the Palisades Interstate Parkway, which also led to the upper
level of the GWB.

G. The upper level toll plaza had twelve toll booths, which the Port Authority
owned and operated. During normal operations, some of the twelve toll booths were designated
to accept payment using only the electronic toll collection system known as Pass,? and
others, serviced by toll booth operators, were designated to accept cash and El Pass. The twelve
toll booths at the upper level toll plaza of the GWB received traf?c from two approaches: (1)
what is known as the ?Main Line,? which included traf?c from Interstate Highways 95 and 80,
US. Route 46, and NJ. Route 4; and (2) an approach for local traf?c traveling through the
streets of Fort Lee (the ?Local Approach?), which included a three-lane access road leading only
to the upper level toll plaza (the ?Local Access Lanes?). Traf?c on the Main Line also fed into
the ten toll booths at the lower level toll plaza of the GWB.

H. Prior to September 9, 2013 and a?er September 13, 2013, during the
weekday morning rush period from approximately 6 am. to 10 am. (also known as the ?Peak
Period?), the Port Authority typically used the three southernmost toll booths on the upper level

toll plaza to handle the traf?c traveling from the Local Access Lanes (the ?Three Southemmost

Toll Booths?). Typically, during the Peak Period, one of the Three Southemmost Toll Booths
was designated only for E-Z Pass use, while the other two toll booths were designated to accept
both cash and E-Z Pass. During the Peak Period, the Port Authority used traf?c cones to
segregate the traf?c from the Main Line from the traf?c using the Local Access Lanes. The
Local Access Lanes were not restricted to the exclusive use of the residents of Fort Lee.

I. Mark J. Sokolich was the Mayor and a resident of Fort Lee (?Mayor
Sokolich?).

J. Christopher J. Christie was the Governor of the State of New Jersey and a
candidate for reelection in the New Jersey gubernatorial election conducted on November 5,
2013 (?Governor Christie?).

K. IGA was a component of the Govemor?s Of?ce that monitored and
facilitated the relationships between the Govemor?s Office and New Jersey state and local
of?cials. IGA employed regional directors, each of whom was responsible for communicating
with local of?cials, including mayors, in a particular region in New Jersey. Prior to November 5,
2013, certain IGA employees, including defendant KELLY, also played a role in seeking
endorsements of Governor Christie?s 2013 reelection from. elected of?cials in New Jersey. To
that end, regional directors were instructed at times to invite New Jersey local of?cials
who might endorse, or might be persuaded to endorse, Governor Christie?s reelection to
functions associated with Governor Christie. These included sporting and entertainment events to
which Governor Christie had access to tickets and events at Governor Christie?s of?cial state
residence. One of the of?cials whose endorsement IGA employees sought was Mayor Sokolich,

who received invitations to some of those functions.

L. The New Jersey Assembly Transportation, Public Works, and Independent
Authorities Committee (the ?Assembly Transportation Committee?) was a New Jersey state
legislative committee that investigated certain activities related to the Port Authority.
2. From in or about August 2013 to in or about December 2013, in the District of
New Jersey and elsewhere, defendants

WILLIAM E. BARONI, JR. and
BRIDGET ANNE KELLY

knowingly and intentionally conspired and agreed with each other and others, including
Wildstein, to obtain by fraud, otherwise without authority knowingly convert to their use and the
use of others, and intentionally misapply property owned by and under the care, custody, and
control of the Port Authority, with a value of at least $5,000, contrary to Title 18, United States
Code, Section 
THE OBJECT OF THE CONSPIRACY
3. The object of the conspiracy was to misuse Port Authority property to facilitate
and conceal the causing of traf?c problems in Fort Lee as punishment of Mayor Sokolich.
SUMMARY OF THE CONSPIRACY
4. In or about August 2013, after defendant KELLY con?rmed that Mayor Sokolich
would not be endorsing Governor Christie for reelection in November 2013, defendant
BARONI, defendant KELLY, and others, including Wildstein (the ?Conspirators?), decided to
punish Mayor Sokolich by deliberately causing signi?cant traf?c problems in Fort Lee through a
reduction in the number of the Local Access Lanes?all under the false pretense of a traf?c
study.
5. Between the mornings of September 9, 2013 and September 13, 2013, the

Conspirators caused the Local Access Lanes to be reduced from three to one so that only one toll

booth, instead of the usual three, was accessible to the Local Approach. To maximize the
congestion and thus the punitive impact on Mayor Sokolich, the Conspirators caused these lane
and toll booth reductions to start on the ?rst day of the school year in Fort Lee, without any
advance notice to Mayor Sokolich, the Fort Lee Chief of Police, and the residents of Fort Lee.
Just as the Conspirators had intended, the lane and toll booth reductions resulted in signi?cant
traf?c in Fort Lee, both for motorists intending to access the GWB from the Local Approach and
for the residents of Fort Lee, whose streets were choked with traf?c backing up from the Local
Approach.

6. To enhance the effectiveness of their scheme, the Conspirators decided that any
questions about the lane and toll booth reductions from Mayor Sokolich and other Fort Lee
of?cials would be disregarded. To that end, the Conspirators purposely ignored communications
from Mayor Sokolich, including his pleas for help, requests for information, and repeated
warnings about the increased risks to public safety.

7. Throughout the course of the conspiracy, the Conspirators concocted and
promoted a sham story that reducing the number of lanes and toll booths accessible to the Local
Approach was for a traf?c study. They created and continually advanced this cover story so that
they could use Port Authority property, including the time and services of unwitting Port
Authority personnel and other resources, to implement the lane and toll booth reductions and to

conceal the Conspirators? true punitive purpose.

MANNER AND MEANS OF THE CONSPIRACY

8. To carry out the conspiracy and to effect its unlawful object, defendant BARONI,
defendant KELLY, and others, including Wildstein, engaged in a variety of means and methods
including, among others, those described below.

9. Between in or about March 2011 and on or about August 12, 2013, Wildstein had
separate discussions with defendant BARONI and defendant KELLY about how they could use
the Local Access Lanes as leverage against Mayor Sokolich.

10. Prior to on or about August 12, 2013, defendant KELLY expressed
disappointment to Wildstein that Mayor Sokolich was not likely to endorse Governor Christie,
despite IGA employees? efforts to obtain that endorsement. In response, Wildstein told defendant
KELLY that they could use the Local Access Lanes to cause traffic problems in Fort Lee
whenever it would be advantageous to do so.

11. On August 12, 2013, defendant KELLY telephoned an employee of Governor
Christie?s reelection campaign who previously, as an IGA employee, had sought Mayor
Sokolich?s endorsement (the ?Campaign Employee?). Defendant KELLY asked the Campaign
Employee to con?rm that Mayor Sokolich would not be endorsing Governor Christie. After the
Campaign Employee confirmed that information, defendant KELLY responded that it was all
she needed to know.

12. On August 13, 2013, having con?rmed that Mayor Sokolich would not be
endorsing Governor Christie for reelection, defendant KELLY instructed Wildstein by email to
implement their plan to punish Mayor Sokolich: ?Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee.?
Wildstein acknowledged his assent by responding, ?Got it,? and communicated defendant

instruction to defendant BARONI. Defendant BARONI agreed that Wildstein should

use the Local Access Lanes and the time and services of Port Authority personnel to cause traf?c
problems in Fort Lee.

13. Soon therea?er, defendant KELLY con?rmed for Wildstein that Mayor Sokolich
was not endorsing Governor Christie for reelection and that the changes to the Local Access
Lanes and resultant traf?c problems in Fort Lee would punish Mayor Sokolich for not endorsing.
Both defendant BARONI and Wildstein agreed to use the lanes for that purpose. To maintain
consistency in dealing with Mayor Sokolich, defendant KELLY also conveyed to certain IGA
employees that they should no longer interact with him.

14. Re?ecting their punitive purpose, on August 19, 2013, defendant KELLY and
Wildstein exchanged the following text messages regarding a rabbi, who, like Mayor Sokolich,

had fallen into disfavor:

 

 a  

 

WILDSTEIN CELL ?And he [the rabbi] has of?cially pissed me off?

 

KELLY CELL ?Clearly?

 

KELLY CELL We cannot cause traf?c problems in front of
1115 house, can we?

 

WILDSTEIN CELL ?Flights to Tel Aviv all mysteriously delayed?

 

KELLY CELL ?Perfect?

 

 

 

 

15. Defendant BARONI, defendant KELLY, and Wildstein agreed to use the cover
story of a traf?c study as a justi?cation for unwitting Port Authority personnel whose services
would be used to implement the changes to the Local Access Lanes and as a means of
concealing the true punitive purpose of the plan. They further agreed that Wildstein would enlist
the services of the Port Authority Engineering department to make the traf?c study cover story

seem legitimate.

16. Subsequently, Wildstein falsely told a Port Authority engineer (the ?Engineer?)
that, to assess the traf?c ?ow at the GWB upper level toll plaza, Wildstein was planning to
remove the traf?c cones that segregated the Main Line from the Local Approach. At Wildstein?s
direction, the Engineer and a Port Authority traf?c engineer (the ?Traf?c Engineer?) presented
Wildstein with several alternative scenarios for altering the Local Access Lanes. In one such
scenario, all of the traf?c on the Local Access Lanes would merge from three lanes down to one
and funnel into one toll booth. This single toll booth would service motorists using both cash and
E-Z Pass, leaving no lane accessible to the Local Approach that would be dedicated for E-Z Pass
users. Wildstein recommended that the single access lane and toll booth scenario would generate
severe traf?c problems in Fort Lee and in?ict harsh punishment on Mayor Sokolich; defendant
BARONI and defendant KELLY agreed.

l7. Wildstein had separate discussions with defendant BARONI and defendant
KELLY regarding the timing of the lane and toll booth reductions. Defendant BARONI
recommended against implementing the reductions in August when travel was traditionally
lighter and the punitive impact would be lessened. Defendant BARONI, defendant KELLY, and
Wildstein agreed that implementing the lane and toll booth reductions on September 9, 2013,
which they knew was the ?rst day of school for children in Fort Lee, would intensify Mayor
Sokolich?s punishment.

18. To maximize the punitive impact of the lane and toll booth reductions, defendant
BARONI, defendant KELLY, and Wildstein agreed not to give Mayor Sokolich and other Fort
Lee of?cials advance notice. The lack of advance notice would prevent Fort Lee of?cials,
including Fort Lee police of?cers, from preparing for the changes, and would keep Fort Lee
residents and GWB commuters from altering their routes. They further agreed that the Port

Authority and IGA would direct any resulting inquiries by Mayor Sokolich or other Fort Lee

of?cials to defendant BARONI as the Deputy Executive Director of the Port Authority. They
also agreed that defendant BARONI would then deliberately ignore Mayor Sokolich and any
other Fort Lee of?cials who inquired about the reductions.

19. To minimize the risk of detection or leaks, defendant BARONI, defendant
KELLY, and Wildstein agreed that Port Authority personnel would be given short notice to
implement the lane and toll booth reductions. Even though they had agreed for some time to start
the reductions on Monday, September 9, 2013, at 6:00 am. in time for the morning rush hour 
Wildstein, with the agreement of defendant BARONI and defendant KELLY, purposely waited
until Friday, September 6, 2013, to order Port Authority personnel to implement the reductions.

20. During his communications with Port Authority personnel in preparation for the
lane and toll booth reductions, Wildstein consistent with his discussions with defendant
BARONI and defendant KELLY - falsely claimed that the lane and toll booth reductions were
for a traf?c study. Based on this misrepresentation, Port Authority personnel took steps to
implement the reductions and to assess their impact on traf?c.

21. On Friday, September 6, 2013, Wildstein instructed a Port Authority manager
with responsibility for the GWB (the Manager?) to implement the lane and toll booth
reductions on Monday, September 9, 2013, but not to notify any Fort Lee of?cials. After
receiving Wildstein?s directive, the GWB Manager: (A) arranged for Port Authority maintenance
staff to cover traf?c signs directing traf?c to the Local Approach; (B) instructed GWB personnel
to have an additional toll booth operator, who would be paid overtime, as a backup for the toll
booth operator covering Toll Lane 24, the lone remaining toll booth that would be accessible to
the Local Approach; and (C) arranged to have the Port Authority Police Department 
work during an extended Peak Period to respond to additional traf?c in Fort Lee from the Local

Approach.

10

22. That same day, Wildstein also advised the Engineer that the lane and toll booth
reductions would begin on the morning of Monday, September 9, 2013. Consequently, the
Engineer contacted the Traf?c Engineer and instructed him to monitor the traf?c consequences
of the lane and toll booth reductions. Similarly, a Port Authority supervisor, who had
responsibilities for the Port Authority?s Tunnels, Bridges, and Terminals department 
(the Manager?), discussed assessing the impact of the lane and toll booth reductions with
one of the individuals who reported to him. Thus, on Friday, September 6, 2013 and during the
lane and toll booth reductions, several Port Authority employees in the Traffic Engineering
department and spent time collecting and reviewing traf?c data, believing it was
necessary to do so.

23. The preparations for and implementation of the lane and toll booth reductions
marked a clear departure from standard Port Authority traf?c study procedures. These
procedures normally do not necessitate or involve sudden, unannounced, and extreme disruptions
for motorists, particularly during rush hour. Rather, the Port Authority ordinarily conducts name
studies without actually affecting traf?c, such as by using existing traf?c data or computer
models.

24. Wildstein kept defendant KELLY and defendant BARONI informed about the
steps he was taking to implement the lane and toll booth reductions. For example, on Saturday,
September 7, 2013, Wildstein sent an email to defendant KELLY that stated, will call you
Monday AM to let you know how Fort Lee goes,? to which defendant KELLY responded,
?Great.? Also, on Sunday, September 8, 2013, Wildstein forwarded to defendant BARONI an
email that Wildstein had received from the GWB Manager describing what Port Authority
personnel had done to prepare for the lane and toll booth reductions and Port Authority resources

that would be needed:

11

Ops [Operations] is on board, Mtce [Maintenance] is covering
signs tonight, and [Port Authority] Police are aware that they will
be controlling traf?c in the intersections for the extended rush.
We?ve also brought a toll collector in on overtime to keep toll lane
24 (the extreme right hand toll lane Upper level) in the event the
collector assigned to TL 24 needs a personal.

25. On the morning .of Monday, September 9, 2013, as defendant BARONI,
defendant KELLY, and Wildstein intended, the lane and toll booth reductions caused signi?cant
tra?ic congestion for motorists traveling within Fort Lee. The congestion resulting from the
reductions also spoiled a legitimate Port Authority traf?c study at Center and Lemoine Avenues
in Fort Lee, which caused the Port Authority to repeat the study.

26. On the ?rst morning of the reductions Monday, September 9, 2013 - Wildstein
went to the GWB to observe the impact personally. In separate telephone conversations with
defendant BARONI and defendant KELLY, Wildstein reported his observations that the lane and
toll booth reductions had, as intended, caused terrible traffic in Fort Lee. Defendant BARONI
and defendant KELLY expressed satisfaction that their scheme was working and agreed to
continue the reductions.

27. Within hours of the lane and toll booth reductions, defendant BARONI received
an email that Mayor Sokolich had called ?re: urgent matter of public safety in Fort Lee.?
Defendant BARONI forwarded the email to Wildstein, who responded by sending an email
reiterating that defendant BARONI should not respond: ?radio silence.? As defendant BARONI,
defendant KELLY, and Wildstein had agreed, defendant BARONI refused to contact or reply to
Mayor Sokolich.

28. Wildstein forwarded to defendant KELLY the email from defendant BARONI

about Mayor Sokolich?s telephone call regarding an ?urgent matter of public safety in Fort Lee.?

Later that day, defendant KELLY and Wildstein exchanged emails con?rming their strategy:

 

 

 

 

 

 

.l A TEXT 
?Did he [defendant call him [Mayor
KELLY EMAIL Sokolich] back??
?Radio silence
WILDSTEIN EMAIL His name comes right after mayor Fulop?
KELLY EMAIL ?Ty [Thank you]?

 

 

Wildstein?s mention of ?Fulop? referred to the coordinated and deliberate re?isal by the
Conspirators to communicate with, meet, or respond to Steven ulop, the Mayor of Jersey City,
beginning in or about late July 2013 because the Conspirators understood that Mayor Fulop was
not endorsing Governor Christie?s reelection.

29. Later in the morning of September 9, 2013, defendant BARONI, Wildstein, and
the Manager received an email from a Port Authority employee who worked in the
Government and Community Relations department (the Employee?). The email stated:

Wanted you both have [sic] a heads up--[the Fort Lee] Borough

Administrator, called me regarding the increased volume and

congestion of AM rush traf?c throughout the Borough as a result

of the GWB toll lanes adjustment that occurred.

She mentioned that there were 2 incidents that Ft Lee PD and EMS

had dif?culty responding to; a missing child (later found) and a

cardiac arrest.

She stated additionally that the Borough and PD had no advance

notice of the planned change. Also, Bill the Mayor [Sokolich] had

placed calls to your of?ce.

If there is anything you need me to do, let me know. Thank you.
Despite receiving the GOCOR Employee?s email, with its references to a missing child and a

medical emergency, defendant BARONI and Wildstein re?lsed to contact Mayor Sokolich or the

Fort Lee Chief of Police about the safety concerns.

13

30. In the a?emoon of September 9, 2013, defendant KELLY checked to see if
Mayor Sokolich was reaching out elsewhere. To that end, defendant KELLY sent an email to an
IGA employee Employee asking, ?Have you spoken to the Fort Lee Mayor?? IGA
Employee #1 responded, ?No, not in a while.? Defendant KELLY also emailed the Campaign
Employee, asking, ?Have you heard from Sokolich in a while?? The Campaign Employee
responded, haven?t.?

31. Also on September 9, 2013, defendant KELLY and Wildstein had a telephone
conversation during which Wildstein reported to defendant KELLY that the lane and toll booth
reductions had caused traf?c problems in Fort Lee. Defendant KELLY instructed Wildstein to
continue the reductions the following day; defendant BARONI agreed with that instruction.

32. On September 10, 2013, after the lane and toll booth reductions continued into a
second day, defendant BARONI received and deliberately ignored two text messages from
Mayor Sokolich. One message stated:

Bill: Mark Sokolich here . . . Port Authority has reduced the toll

Boots [sic] for Fort Lee from three to only one. As of yesterday we

are in total gridlock. Same thing today. Have a town that is ready

to revolt. Who?s mad at me? What do I do when Redevelopment 5

is online. Would not otherwise bother you however I have no

choice. Please call me. Rather urgent.
The other message from Mayor Sokolich stated: ?Presently we have four [sic] very busy traf?c
lanes merging into only one toll booth . . . . . The bigger problem is getting kids to school. Help
please. It?s maddening.? Later that day, defendant BARONI forwarded the second text message
to Wildstein; Wildstein, in turn, forwarded that message to defendant KELLY.

33. After Wildstein received and forwarded to defendant KELLY Mayor Sokolich?s

text message about the problem of getting children to school, defendant KELLY and Wildstein

exchanged text messages that stated, in pertinent part:

14

 

. KELLY CELL ?Is it wrong that I am smiling??

 

 

 

WILDSTEIN CELL ?No?
KELLY CELL feel badly about the kids?
KELLY CELL guess?

 

WILDSTEIN CELL ?They are the children of Buono voters . . . 

 

WILDSTEIN CELL ?Bottom line is he didn?t say safety?

 

KELLY CELL ?Exactly!?

 

 

 

 

Wildstein?s statement about ?Buono voters? was a reference to supporters of New Jersey State
Senator Barbara Buono, Governor Christie?s principal opponent in the 2013 gubernatorial
election. Despite Mayor Sokolich?s pleas for help and information and his reference to
schoolchildren stuck in traffic gridlock, defendant BARONI did not respond to him.

34. On September 10, 2013, defendant BARONI received two communications
regarding Mayor Sokolich?s attempts to seek information about the lane and toll booth
reductions. The ?rst was an email from defendant assistant that read, in pertinent
part: ?Phone call: Mayor Sokolich (his of?ce) . . . re: change of traf?c patterns.? The second was
an email from the GOCOR Employee that stated, in pertinent part:

Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich called this morning regarding the
traf?c in Fort Lee[.]

?reasons unclear to us . . 

The Mayor would like to talk to you as soon as possible, regarding
the traf?c congestion due to the change in GWB toll booths
con?guration. He remains concerned, doesn?t understand the
purpose/need of the traf?c test and doesn?t understand why the
borough was not alerted. Additionally, he said that he is trying to
?keep a lid on this? (politically) and is getting pressure from
members of Borough Council who want to take some action. He
feels this is a ?life /safety? issue.

15

Defendant BARONI ignored and refused to respond to Mayor Sokolich?s entreaties. Nor did
defendant BARONI even inquire of Mayor Sokolich or the Fort Lee Chief of Police about the
nature of the ?life/safety? issue.

35. Also on September 10, 2013, defendant KELLY and Wildstein had a telephone
conversation during which Wildstein con?rmed that the lane and toll booth reductions had
caused traf?c problems in Fort Lee. Defendant KELLY instructed Wildstein to continue the
reductions the following day; defendant BARONI agreed with that instruction.

36. On September 11, 2013, defendant KELLY and Wildstein had a telephone
conversation during which Wildstein reported to defendant KELLY that the lane and toll booth
reductions again had caused traf?c problems in Fort Lee. Defendant KELLY instructed
Wildstein to continue the reductions the following day; defendant BARONI agreed with that

instruction.

37. On September 12, 2013, defendant BARONI received by email a letter from
Mayor Sokolich that was marked 

I am writing this correspondence to you and am refraining
from copying any other party in the hopes that a recent . . .
decision by the Port Authority will be reversed quietly,
uneventfully and without political fanfare.

Permit me to elaborate. Without any notice whatsoever to
Fort Lee (or any of its agencies, including our Police Department),
the Port Authority reduced the available toll booths for traf?c
?owing through Fort Lee from three to one. Suf?ce it to say, this
decision has wreaked havoc upon our community during the
morning rush hour, visiting upon us complete gridlock. Having
received absolutely no notice of this decision, not having obtained
any response to our multiple inquiries concerning sameunderstand its rationale without the bene?t of a
response from the Port Authority, we are reaching the conclusion
that there are punitive overtones associated with this initiative.
What other conclusion could we possibly reach?

16

Our emergency service vehicles are experiencing
tremendous response time delays and my of?ce is overwhelmed
with complaints. Unguestionably, this decision has negatively

impacted public safety here in Fort Lee. Adding insult to inju_ry,
many members of the public have indicated to me that the Port

Authority Police Of?cers are advising commuters in response to
their complaints that this recent traf?c debacle is the result of a
decision that I, as the Mayor, recently made. The basis, reason, or
genesis of the decision is of no consequence to me; however, its
profound and adverse impact on our community is of paramount
importance to me.

I have incessantly attempted to contact Port Authority
representatives to no avail. Would you please be good enough to
please have someone contact me or [the Fort Lee Chief of Police]
to discuss the basis of this recent policy change and what we must
do to reverse it . . . plain and simple. Query: What do I do when
our billion dollar redevelopment is put on line at the end of the
next year?
Please call me as soon as possible in the hopes that we can
resolve this issue and reverse a policy change that is wreaking
havoc on Fort Lee . . . . the otherwise cooperative and supportive
host community to the busiest bridge in the world.
(emphasis in original). Shortly a?er receiving Mayor Sokolich?s letter, defendant BARONI
forwarded it by email to Wildstein, who then forwarded it to defendant KELLY. As defendant
BARONI, defendant KELLY, and Wildstein had agreed, defendant BARONI deliberately
ignored and refused to respond to Mayor Sokolich?s letter, de5pite its explicit reference to issues
of public safety and ?complete gridlock.?

38. In addition to the letter, on September 12, 2013, Mayor Sokolich called the
GOCOR Employee regarding the lane and toll booth reductions. The GOCOR Employee then
sent a message for defendant BARONI asking whether to return Mayor Sokolich?s call.
Defendant BARONI conveyed to the GOCOR Employee through coded language that the

GOCOR Employee should not contact Mayor Sokolich.

17

39. On September 12, 2013, defendant BARONI also received a text message from
Mayor Sokolich that stated, ?My frustration is now trying to ?gure out who is mad at me.?
Defendant BARONI refused to respond and instead forwarded this text message to Wildstein.

40. Also on September 12, 2013, in response to a media inquiry about the lane and
toll booth reductions and the resulting traf?c congestion in Fort Lee, Wildstein, with defendant
knowledge and approval, caused the Port Authority?s Media Relations department
(?Media Relations?) to issue a media statement that falsely claimed that: (A) ?The Port Authority
is reviewing traf?c safety patterns at the George Washington Bridge to ensure proper placement
of toll lanes?; and (B) the has been in contact with Fort Lee throughout the transition.?
Wildstein sent a draft of this statement to defendant KELLY before it was issued. Defendant
BARONI, defendant KELLY, and Wildstein knew that this statement was not true.

41. That same day, defendant KELLY received an email from an IGA employee
Employee who summarized a telephone call that IGA Employee #1 had received
from Mayor Sokolich. The email stated:

This afternoon, Employee received a call from Mayor
. Sokolich. It came from a number he was not familiar with that was
actually a secretary who patched the Mayor through to 
Employee 
The Mayor is extremely upset about the reduction of toll lanes
from 3 to 1. Not only is is [sic] causing a horrendous traf?c back
up in town, First Responders are having a terrible time
maneuvering the traf?c because the back up is so severe.
The Mayor told Employee that he has no idea why Port
Authority decided to do this, but there is a feeling in town that it is
government retribution for something. He simply can?t understand
why that would be the case however, because he has always been

so supportive of the Governor.

Sokolich explained that the Council wants to organize a press
conference with picketers at the foot of the bridge. The Mayor

18

feels he is about to lose control of the situation and that he looks
like a idiot.?

Employee told the ?ne Mayor he was unaware that the
toll lanes were closed, but he would see what he could ?nd out.

Defendant KELLY forwarded IGA Employee #2?s email to Wildstein. As defendant BARONI,
defendant KELLY, and Wildstein had agreed, despite receiving the email from IGA Employee
#2 and its references to ?horrendous traf?c back up? and the problems facing ?rst responders,
defendant KELLY did not contact Mayor Sokolich, or take any steps to address his concerns.
Instead, defendant KELLY responded to IGA Employee #2?s email conveying that Mayor
Sokolich was upset: ?Good.?

42. On the morning of September 13, 2013, defendant BARONI, among others,
received an email from the Executive Director announcing that he had learned about and was
ending the lane and toll booth reductions. The Executive Director explained that he was doing so
because, among other reasons: (A) the lane and toll booth reductions had been implemented
without notifying Fort Lee, the commuting public, Media Relations, or the Executive Director;
and (B) the lane and toll booth reductions had engulfed the entire Fort Lee area in severe traf?c
delays and had resulted in delays to emergency vehicles.

43. After sending this email, the Executive Director copied defendant BARONI on an
email that he sent to the head of Media Relations, asking how the Port Authority could inform
the public that the lane and toll booth reductions had ended. Defendant BARONI emailed the
Executive Director that they ?need[ed] to discuss prior to any communications? and that ?[t]here
can be no public discourse.?

44. Later that day, defendant BARONI met with the Executive Director on two

occasions. Defendant BARONI demanded that the Executive Director immediately reinstate the

19

lane and toll booth reductions because the reductions were important to ?Trenton.? The
Executive Director re?lsed defendant demand.

45. Also on September 13, 2013, in response to a media inquiry about the lane and
toll booth reductions and the resulting traf?c in Fort Lee, defendant BARONI and Wildstein
drafted, approved, and caused Media Relations to issue a second false and misleading media
statement: ?The Port Authority has conducted a week of study at the George Washington Bridge
of traf?c safety patterns. We will now review those results and determine the best traf?c patterns
at the GWB. We will continue to work with our local law enforcement partners.?

46. A?er the lane and toll booth reductions ended, defendant BARONI, defendant
KELLY, and Wildstein continued their agreement to use Port Authority resources to advance
their cover story. They also agreed that defendant BARONI would continue to respond with
deliberate silence to Mayor Sokolich?s requests for an explanation of the reductions.

47. On September 16, 2013, in response to another media inquiry, defendant
BARONI instructed Media Relations to re-issue the same false and misleading media statement
that he and Wildstein had drafted and approved on Friday, September 13, 2013.

48. On September 17, 2013, Mayor Sokolich sent the following text messages to
defendant BARONI:

We should talk. Someone needs to tell me that the recent traf?c
debacle was not punitive in nature. The last four reporters that
contacted me suggest that the people they are speaking with
absolutely believe it to be punishment. Try as I may to dispel these
rumors I am having a tough time.

A private face-to-face would be important to me. Perhaps someone
can enlighten me as to the errors of my ways. Let me know if
you?ll give me 10 minutes. Regards Mark

49. Defendant BARONI immediately forwarded Mayor Sokolich?s text messages to

Wildstein and noted that they were from ?Serbia,? referring to Mayor Sokolich (who is actually

20

of Croatian descent). Wildstein then forwarded them to defendant KELLY and sought
instructions about how to respond. That same day, Wildstein exchanged multiple messages with
defendant BARONI and defendant KELLY as they coordinated the response to Mayor
Sokolich?s texts. [Wildstein?s communications with defendant BARONI are unshaded and

Wildstein?s communications with defendant KELLY are shaded in black]:

 

 

 

SOURCE RECIPIENT TEXT
BARONI CELL WILDSTEIN CELL 
CELL BARONI CELL ?Have not heard back fr Bridget?

 

 

BARONI CELL

WILDSTEIN CELL

KELLY CELL

CELL

 

CELL

 

WILDSTEIN CELL

KELLY CELL

CELL

KELLY CELL

BARONI CELL

 

$3Fck33

 

"Please let me know instructions"

?Just ?nishing a meeting"

"Ok. I?m in board meeting but can step out to call
when you?re ready?

?Bridget; Just finishing a meeting?

 

WILDSTEIN CELL

BARONI CELL

?So we will speak soon?

 

CELL

WILDSTEIN CELL

?We could sched a meeting to stave off reporters
then pull a faps?

 

WILDSTEIN CELL

CELL

?Like for Monday??

 

CELL

WILDSTEIN CELL

?Too cute. Tuesday or later next week.?

 

 

WILDSTEIN CELL

WILDSTEIN CELL

 

 

BARONI CELL

KELLY CELL

 



 

?Baroni crazed so let me know when to call, I have

something at 3 I can't walk out oi?

?[P]ull a faps? referred to defendant and Wildstein?s strategy of scheduling a
meeting that they intended all along to cancel, as they did with FAPS, Inc. a Port

Authority tenant, to punish Mayor Fulop, who had represented FAPS.

21

50. On September 17, 2013, defendant BARONI caused his assistant to schedule a
meeting with Mayor Sokolich, although defendant BARONI intended to cancel. Before
defendant BARONI could cancel the meeting, however, Mayor Sokolich did so.

51. After the lane and toll booth reductions ended, defendant BARONI and Wildstein
discussed obtaining Port Authority traf?c data to assist them in further developing the ?ction that
the reductions had been for a traf?c study. On September 24, 2013, pursuant to that discussion,
Wildstein obtained Port Authority traf?c data from a Port Authority employee.

52. In or about November 2013, with defendant knowledge, defendant
BARONI and Wildstein prepared a misleading written statement for a Port Authority report that
would falsely represent that the reductions were for a traf?c study. To prepare that written
statement, defendant BARONI and Wildstein improperly used Port Authority resources,
including the time and services of Port Authority personnel.

53. On November 20, 2013, defendant BARONI was invited to testify on November
25, 2013 before the Assembly Transportation Committee, which was investigating the lane and
toll booth reductions. As a result, with defendant knowledge, defendant BARONI and
Wildstein converted the dra? of the false and misleading written statement into defendant
prepared opening testimony.

54. On November 22, 2013, while preparing for his upcoming testimony, defendant
BARONI had conversations with two PAPD of?cers, during which defendant BARONI sought
to enlist their assistance in falsely corroborating that the PAPD had suggested a traf?c study of
the Local Access Lanes. Both PAPD of?cers told defendant BARONI that the PAPD had had no
such involvement.

55. On November 25, 2013, defendant BARONI appeared before the Assembly

Transportation Committee and, with the knowledge and agreement of defendant KELLY and

22

Wildstein, provided false and misleading testimony about the lane and toll booth reductions.
During his testimony, defendant BARONI knowingly and intentionally made the following
misleading statements and false representations, among others:

A. Communications between members of the PAPD and
Wildstein triggered the lane and toll booth reductions.

B. The lane and toll booth reductions were part of a one-week
traf?c study.
C. The failure to communicate with Fort Lee and the

Executive Director was simply the result of communication
breakdowns at the Port Authority.

In particular, with respect to what he repeatedly insisted were communication breakdowns with
Fort Lee, defendant BARONI did not admit that he intentionally maintained ?radio silence?
toward Mayor Sokolich, but instead testified falsely, ?[t]he communication was ?awed
internally, the communication was ?awed with our neighbors?no question. And I?m?given the
amount of time I?ve spent building a relationship with Mark Sokolich?hugely problematic,
personally.?

56. On November 25, 2013, defendant BARONI, defendant KELLY, and Wildstein
caused public statements to be prepared by others in support of defendant testimony
before the Assembly Transportation Committee.

57. On December 12, 2013, defendant KELLY telephoned IGA Employee #2 and
discussed their September 12, 2013 email exchange, referred to above in Paragraph 41, in which
IGA Employee #2 recounted IGA Employee #l?s conversation with Mayor Sokolich about the
traf?c problems and to which defendant KELLY responded, ?Good.? During their conversation,

defendant KELLY asked IGA Employee #2 to delete that email exchange.

23

58. On December 13, 2013, the day on which the resignations of defendant BARONI
and Wildstein from the Port Authority became effective, defendant KELLY falsely claimed that
she had nothing to do with the lane and toll booth reductions.

OVERT ACTS

59. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect its unlaw?il object, the following
overt acts were committed in the District of New Jersey and elsewhere:

A. On August 13, 2013, defendant KELLY sent Wildstein an email stating,
?Time for some traf?c problems in Fort Lee.?

B. On August 13, 2013, shortly after receiving defendant email,
Wildstein acknowledged his assent to defendant instruction by responding, ?Got it.?

C. Subsequently, on or about August 13, 2013, Wildstein informed defendant
BARONI of defendant instruction to cause traf?c problems in Fort Lee, and defendant
BARONI agreed that Wildstein should take steps to implement defendant instruction.

D. On or about August 28, 2013, Wildstein contacted the Engineer and
falsely represented that Wildstein was planning to order the removal of the traf?c cones that
segregated the Main Line from the Local Approach to assess the traf?c ?ow at the GWB upper
level toll plaza.

E. On September, 6, 2013, Wildstein had a telephone conversation with the
GWB Manager during which: (1) he directed the GWB Manager to implement the lane and toll
booth reductions starting on September 9, 2013 at 6:00 am, in time for the morning rush; (2) he
falsely represented to the GWB Manager that these reductions were being implemented to
conduct a traf?c study; and (3) he directed the GWB Manager not to notify any Fort Lee of?cials

about the impending reductions.

24

F. On September 6, 2013, Wildstein had a telephone conversation with the
Manager, during which: (1) he told the Manager that the lane and toll booth
reductions would be implemented starting on the morning of September 9, 2013; and (2) he
falsely represented to the Manager that these reductions were being implemented to
conduct a traf?c study.

G. On September 6, 2013, Wildstein had a telephone conversation with the
Engineer during which he told the Engineer that the lane and toll booth reductions would be
implemented starting on the morning of September 9, 2013.

H. On September 7, 2013, Wildstein sent defendant KELLY an email in
which Wildstein stated that he would inform defendant KELLY on the morning of September 9,
2013 of the impact of the lane and toll booth reductions.

I. On September 8, 2013, Wildstein forwarded to defendant BARONI an
email from the GWB Manager describing Port Authority resources being used to implement the
lane and toll booth reductions.

J. On September 9, 2013, at approximately 6:00 am, defendant BARONI,
defendant KELLY, and Wildstein caused the lane and toll booth reductions to become effective.

K. On September 9, 2013, after receiving an email from defendant BARONI
indicating that Mayor Sokolich had called defendant BARONI that morning ?re: urgent matter of
public safety in Fort Lee,? Wildstein responded to defendant BARONI by sending an email that
stated: ?radio silence.?

L. On September 9, 2013, defendant KELLY sent Wildstein an email,

thanking Wildstein for con?rming that defendant BARONI maintained ?[r]adio silence? toward

Mayor Sokolich.

25

M. On September 9, 2013, defendant KELLY emailed IGA Employee #1 to
check whether IGA Employee #1 had spoken to Mayor Sokolich.

N. On September 9, 2013, defendant KELLY emailed the Campaign
Employee to ask whether the Campaign Employee had heard from Mayor Sokolich in a while.

0. On September 9, 2013, defendant KELLY told Wildstein by telephone to
continue the lane and toll booth reductions on September 10, 2013.

P. On September 10, 2013, defendant KELLY told Wildstein by telephone to
continue the lane and toll booth reductions on September 11, 2013.

Q. On September 11, 2013, defendant KELLY told Wildstein by telephone to
continue the lane and toll booth reductions on September 12, 2013.

R. On September 12, 2013, defendant BARONI forwarded to Wildstein
Mayor Sokolich?s September 12, 2013 letter regarding the impact of the lane and toll booth
reductions.

S. On September 12, 2013, Wildstein forwarded to defendant KELLY Mayor
Sokolich?s September 12, 2013 letter regarding the impact of the lane and toll booth reductions.

T. On September 12, 2013, defendant BARONI conveyed to the GOCOR
Employee through coded language that the GOCOR Employee should not contact Mayor
Sokolich.

U. On September 12, 2013, defendant BARONI forwarded to Wildstein a text
message from Mayor Sokolich that stated, ?My frustration is now trying to ?gure out who is mad
at me.?

V. On September 12, 2013, defendant BARONI and Wildstein drafted and
approved a false and misleading media statement claiming that the lane and toll booth reductions

were done to review traf?c safety patterns at the GWB.

26

W. On September 12, 2013, defendant KELLY forwarded to Wildstein an
email from IGA Employee #2 regarding a telephone call from Mayor Sokolich to IGA Employee
#1 about the traf?c problems in Fort Lee.

X. On September 12, 2013, defendant KELLY responded to IGA Employee
#2?3 email about the telephone call from Mayor Sokolich to IGA Employee stating, ?Good.?

Y. On September 13, 2013, defendant BARONI told the Executive Director
by email that they ?need[ed] to discuss prior to any communications? and that ?[t]here can be no
public discourse.?

Z. On September 13, 2013, defendant BARONI demanded that the Executive
Director reinstate the lane and toll booth reductions because the reductions were important to
?Trenton.?

AA. On September 13, 2013, defendant BARONI and Wildstein drafted and
approved a second false and misleading media statement claiming that the lane and toll booth
reductions were done to conduct a week of study of traffic safety patterns at the GWB.

BB. On September 16, 2013, defendant BARONI instructed Media Relations
to re-issue the false and misleading media statement that he and Wildstein had drafted and
approved on September 13, 2013.

CC. On November 25, 2013, defendant BARONI provided false and
misleading testimony regarding the lane and toll booth reductions to the Assembly
Transportation Committee.

DD. On December 12, 2013, defendant KELLY asked IGA Employee #2 to
delete their September 12, 2013 email exchange regarding a telephone call from Mayor
Sokolich, as referred to above in Paragraph 41.

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371.

27

COUNT 2

(Obtaining by Fraud, Knowingly Converting, and Intentionally
Misapplying Property of an Organization Receiving Federal Bene?ts)

1. Paragraph 1 and Paragraphs 3 to 59 of Count 1 are realleged and incorporated by
reference as though fully set forth in this Count.

2. From in or about August 2013 to in or about December 2013, in the District of
New Jersey and elsewhere, defendants

WILLIAM E. BARONI, JR. and
BRIDGET ANNE KELLY,

with defendant BARONI and Wildstein being agents of the Port Authority, obtained by fraud,
otherwise without authority knowingly converted to their use and the use of others, and
intentionally misapplied property owned by and under the care, custody, and control of the Port
Authority, with a value of at least $5,000.

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 666(a)(1)(A) and Section 2.

28



(Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud)
1. Paragraph 1 and Paragraphs 3 to 59 of Count 1 are realleged and incorporated by
reference as though ?Jlly set forth in this Count. 
THE CONSPIRACY
2. From in or about August 2013 to in or about December 2013, in the District of
New Jersey and elsewhere, defendants

WILLIAM E. BARONI, JR. and
BRIDGET ANNE KELLY

knowingly and intentionally conspired and agreed with each other and others, including
Wildstein, to devise a scheme and arti?ce to defraud, and to obtain money and property from the
Port Authority by means Of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and
promises, and for the purpose of executing such scheme and arti?ce, to transmit and cause to be
transmitted by means of wire communications in interstate commerce certain writings, signs,
signals, pictures, and sounds, contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.
THE OBJECT OF THE CONSPIRACY

3. The object of the conspiracy was to obtain money and property from the Port
Authority and to deprive the Port Authority of its right to control its own assets by falsely
representing and causing false representations to be made that the lane and toll booth reductions
were for the purpose of a traf?c study.

MANNER AND MEANS OF THE CONSPIRACY

4. To carry out the conspiracy and to effect its unlawful Object, defendant BARONI,

defendant KELLY, and others, including Wildstein, engaged in a number of means and methods,

including those referred to in Paragraphs 8 to 58 of Count 1, among others, and those described

below.

29

5. Throughout the course of the conspiracy and in furtherance of their fraudulent
scheme, defendant BARONI, defendant KELLY, and Wildstein caused telephone calls to be

made and received in interstate commerce and caused emails to be sent and received in interstate

commerce.

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.

30

COUNTS 4 to 7
(Wire Fraud)
1. Paragraph 1 and Paragraphs 3 to 59 of Count 1 and Paragraphs 3 to 5 of Count 3
are realleged and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth in Counts 4 to 7.
2. From in or about August 2013 to in or about December 2013, in the District of
New Jersey and elsewhere, defendants

WILLIAM E. BARONI, JR. and
BRIDGET ANNE KELLY

and others, including Wildstein, knowingly and intentionally devised and intended to devise a
scheme and arti?ce to defraud the Port Authority and to obtain money and property from the Port
Authority by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises,
which scheme is described in substance above in Count 3 of the Indictment.

3. On or about the dates set forth below, in the District of New Jersey and elsewhere,
for the purpose of executing and attempting to execute this scheme and arti?ce to de?aud and to
obtain money and property by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses,
representations, and promises, the respective defendant knowingly and intentionally transmitted
and caused to be transmitted by means of wire communication in interstate commerce certain

writings, signs, signals, pictures and sounds, as described below:

31

 



      

 

August 13,2013

Email from defendant KELLY to
Wildstein stating, ?Time for some traf?c
problems in Fort Lee?

KELLY

 

September 9, 2013

Email from defendant BARONI to
Wildstein indicating that Mayor Sokolich
had called for defendant BARONI that
morning ?re: urgent matter of public
safety in Fort Lee?

BARONI

 

September 9, 2013

Email from defendant KELLY to
Wildstein thanking Wildstein for
con?rming that defendant BARONI
maintained ?[r]adio silence? toward
Mayor Sokolich

KELLY

 

 

 

September 12, 2013

 

Email from defendant BARONI to
Wildstein forwarding a letter that was
marked from Mayor
Sokolich to defendant BARONI, dated
September 12, 2013

 

BARONI

 

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343 and Section 2.

32

 

COUNT 8
(Conspiracy Against Civil Rights)
1. Paragraph 1 and Paragraphs 3 to 59 of Count 1 and Paragraphs 3 to 5 of Count 3
are realleged and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth in this Count.
THE CONSPIRACY
2. Between in or about August 2013 and on or about September 13, 2013, in the
District of New Jersey and elsewhere, defendants

WILLIAM E. BARONI, JR. and
BRIDGET ANNE KELLY

knowingly and willfully conspired and agreed with each other and others, including Wildstein, to
injure and oppress the residents of Fort Lee in the free exercise and enjoyment of the rights and
privileges secured to them by the Constitution and laws of the United States, namely, the right to
localized travel on public roadways free from restrictions unrelated to legitimate government
objectives.
THE OBJECT OF THE CONSPIRACY

3. The object of the conspiracy was to interfere with the localized travel rights of the
residents of Fort Lee for the illegitimate purpose of causing signi?cant traffic problems in Fort
Lee to punish Mayor Sokolich.

MANNER AND MEANS OF THE CONSPIRACY

4. To carry out the conspiracy and to effect its unlawful Object, defendant BARONI,
defendant KELLY, and others, including Wildstein, engaged in a number of means and methods,
including those referred to in Paragraphs 8 to 58 of Count 1 and Paragraphs 4 and of Count 3,

among others, and those described below.

33

 

5. Defendant BARONI, defendant KELLY, and Wildstein chose the ?rst day of
school in Fort Lee to implement the lane and toll booth reductions to maximize the impact of the
reductions and create as much traf?c and disruption as possible in Fort Lee.

6. Defendant BARONI, defendant KELLY, and Wildstein purposely selected a
strategy that merged traf?c that ordinarily fed into the Three Southemmost Toll Booths into one
lane leading to one toll booth that was designated for use by all vehicles whether the motorists
paid the toll by cash or E-Z Pass.

7. Defendant BARONI, defendant KELLY, and Wildstein agreed that no advance
warning of the lane and toll booth reductions would be provided to the public so that motorists
using the Local Approach and residents of Fort Lee could not anticipate delays, adjust their
travel plans, or otherwise prepare for the anticipated disruption caused by the traf?c.

8. Defendant BARONI, defendant KELLY, and Wildstein agreed that, to exacerbate
the impact of the reductions, no advance notice of the lane and toll booth reductions would be
provided to Mayor Sokolich or the Fort Lee Chief of Police.

9. To minimize the risk of detection and leaks, defendant BARONI, defendant
KELLY, and Wildstein purposely gave short advance notice to Port Authority personnel on or
about Friday, September 6, 2013 to implement the lane and toll booth reductions on Monday
morning, September 9, 2013.

10. Defendant BARONI, defendant KELLY, and Wildstein agreed that the Port
Authority and IGA would maintain ?radio silence? toward Mayor Sokolich, even when Mayor
Sokolich advised on multiple occasions that the lane and toll booth reductions were adversely

affecting Fort Lee and were posing increased risks to public safety.

34

11. During the lane and toll booth reductions, despite receiving updates on the serious
traf?c congestion that they were in?icting upon Fort Lee and its residents, defendant BARONI,
defendant KELLY, and Wildstein agreed that the reductions should continue each day.

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 241.

35

 

COUNT 9
(Deprivation of Civil Rights)

1. Paragraph 1 and Paragraphs 3 to 59 of Count 1, Paragraphs 3 to 5 of Count 3, and
Paragraphs 3 to 11 of Count 8 are realleged and incorporated by reference as though fully set
forth in this Count.

2. Between in or about August 2013 and on or about September 13, 2013, defendant
BARONI and Wildstein were agents of the Port Authority and defendant KELLY was an agent
of the Governor?s Of?ce. During that time period, defendant BARONI, defendant KELLY, and
Wildstein were acting under color of law within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code,
Section 242.

3. Between in or about August 2013 and on or about September 13, 2013, in the
District of New Jersey and elsewhere, defendants

WILLIAM E. BARONI, JR. and
BRIDGET ANNE KELLY,

with defendant BARONI, defendant KELLY, and Wildstein acting under color of law,
knowingly and willfully deprived the residents of Fort Lee of the rights, privileges, and
immunities secured and protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States, namely, the
right to localized travel on public roadways free from restrictions unrelated to legitimate
government objectives.

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 242 and Section 2.

36

A TRUE BILL




UNIT ATTORNEY

?17

 

CASE NUMBER: 15- IQB 

United States District Court
District of New Jersey

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

V.

WILLIAM E. BARONI, JR. and
BRIDGET ANNE KELLY

 

INDICTMENT

l8 U.S.C. 241, 242, 371,
666(a) (1) (A), 1343, 1349, and 2

 

PAUL J. FISHMAN

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, NEWARK, NEW JERSEY

 

LEE M. CORTES, JR.
VIKAS KHANNA
DAVID . FEDER
ASSISTANT U. . ATTORNEYS

.973 -645-2742