5/30/2015 Press Release Press Releases Press U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont Home / Press / Press Releases Patrick / Press Release 01.21.15 Leahy & Grassley Press Administration On Use Of Cell Phone Tracking Program . . . SJC Chair And Ranking Member Ask DOJ, DHS About CellSite Simulators WASHINGTON (Wednesday, December 31, 2014) – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Ranking Member Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) pressed top Obama administration officials on the use of cell-site simulators, which can unknowingly sweep up the cell phone signals of innocent Americans. Recent news reports have chronicled the use of such simulators by law enforcement, explaining that the simulators have the potential to capture data about the location of thousands of cell phones in their vicinity. Leahy and Grassley previously pressed the FBI about the use of this technology. In a joint letter sent last week to Attorney General Eric Holder and Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson, the Senators raised questions about exceptions to a new FBI policy to obtain a search warrant before using a cell-site simulator. The Senators also asked about other agencies’ use of the technology. “It remains unclear how other agencies within the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security make use of cell-site simulators and what policies are in place to govern their use of that technology,” Leahy and Grassley wrote. Outlining privacy concerns for innocent individuals, the letter continues: “The Judiciary Committee needs a broader understanding of the full range of law enforcement agencies that use this technology, the policies in place to protect the privacy interests of those whose information might be collected using these devices, and the legal process that DOJ and DHS entities seek prior to using them.” A copy of the December 23 letter to Attorney General Holder and Secretary Johnson can be found online and below. https://www.leahy.senate.gov/press/leahy-and-grassley-press-administration-on-use-of-cell-phone-tracking-program 1/4 5/30/2015 Press Release Press Releases Press U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont ##### December 23, 2014 The Honorable Eric H. Holder, Jr. The Honorable Jeh Johnson Attorney General Secretary of Homeland Security Department of Justice Department of Homeland Security 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20528 Washington, D.C. 20530 Dear Attorney General Holder and Secretary Johnson: In recent months, media reports have detailed the use of cell-site simulators (often referred to as “IMSI Catchers” or “Stingrays”) by federal, state and local law enforcement agencies. Most recently a November 14, 2014, Wall Street Journal article (“Americans’ Cellphones Targeted in Secret U.S. Spy Program”) reported that the United States Marshals Service regularly deploys airborne cell-site simulators (referred to as “DRT boxes” or “dirtboxes”) from five metropolitan-area airports across the United States. Like the more common Stingray devices, these “dirtboxes” mimic standard cell towers, forcing affected cell phones to reveal their approximate location and registration information. The Wall Street Journal article reports that “dirtboxes” are capable of gathering data from tens of thousands of cellphones in a single flight. We wrote to FBI Director Comey in June seeking information about law enforcement use of cell-site simulators. Since then, our staff members have participated in two briefings with FBI officials, and at the most recent session they learned that the FBI recently changed its policy with respect to the type of legal process that it typically seeks before employing this type of technology. According to this new policy, the FBI now obtains a search warrant before deploying a cell-site simulator, although the policy contains a number of potentially broad exceptions and we continue to have questions about how it is being implemented in practice. Furthermore, it remains unclear how other agencies within the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security make use of cell-site simulators and what policies are in place to govern their use of that technology. The Judiciary Committee needs a broader understanding of the full range of law enforcement agencies that use this technology, the policies in place to protect the privacy interests of those whose information might be collected using these devices, and the legal process that DOJ and https://www.leahy.senate.gov/press/leahy-and-grassley-press-administration-on-use-of-cell-phone-tracking-program 2/4 5/30/2015 Press Release Press Releases Press U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont DHS entities seek prior to using them. For example, we understand that the FBI’s new policy requires FBI agents to obtain a search warrant whenever a cell-site simulator is used as part of a FBI investigation or operation, unless one of several exceptions apply, including (among others): (1) cases that pose an imminent danger to public safety, (2) cases that involve a fugitive, or (3) cases in which the technology is used in public places or other locations at which the FBI deems there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. We have concerns about the scope of the exceptions. Specifically, we are concerned about whether the FBI and other law enforcement agencies have adequately considered the privacy interests of other individuals who are not the targets of the interception, but whose information is nevertheless being collected when these devices are being used. We understand that the FBI believes that it can address these interests by maintaining that information for a short period of time and purging the information after it has been collected. But there is a question as to whether this sufficiently safeguards privacy interests. Accordingly, please provide written responses to these questions by January 30, 2015: Since the effective date of the FBI’s new policy: How many times has the FBI used a cell-site simulator? In how many of these instances was the use of the cell-site simulator authorized by a search warrant? In how many of these instances was the use of the cell-site simulator authorized by some other form of legal process? Please identify the legal process used. In how many of these instances was the cell-site simulator used without any legal process? How many times has each of the exceptions to the search warrant policy, including those listed above, been used by the FBI? From January 1, 2010, to the effective date of the FBI’s new policy: How many times did the FBI use a cell-site simulator? In how many of these instances was the use of a cell-site simulator authorized by a search warrant? In how many of these instances was the use of the cell-site simulator authorized by some other form of legal process? Please identify the legal process used. In how many of these instances was the cell-site simulator used without any legal process? In how many of the instances referenced in Question 2(d) did the FBI use a cell-site simulator https://www.leahy.senate.gov/press/leahy-and-grassley-press-administration-on-use-of-cell-phone-tracking-program 3/4 5/30/2015 Press Release Press Releases Press U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont in a public place or other location in which the FBI deemed there is no reasonable expectation of privacy? What is the FBI’s current policy on the retention and destruction of the information collected by cell-site simulators in all cases? How is that policy enforced? What other DOJ and DHS agencies use cell-site simulators? What is the policy of these agencies regarding the legal process needed for use of cell-site simulators? Are these agencies seeking search warrants specific to the use of cell-site simulators? If not, what legal authorities are they using? Do these agencies make use of public place or other exceptions? If so, in what proportion of all instances in which the technology is used are exceptions relied upon? What are these agencies’ policies on the retention and destruction of the information that is collected by cell-site simulators? How are those policies enforced? What is the Department of Justice’s guidance to United States Attorneys’ Offices regarding the legal process required for the use of cell-site simulators? Across all DOJ and DHS entities, what protections exist to safeguard the privacy interests of individuals who are not the targets of interception, but whose information is nevertheless being collected by cell-site simulators? Please number your written responses according to their corresponding questions. In addition, please arrange for knowledgeable DOJ and DHS officials to provide a briefing to Judiciary Committee staff about these issues following the provision of these written responses, but no later than February 6, 2015. Press Contact Press Contact David Carle: 202-224-3693 https://www.leahy.senate.gov/press/leahy-and-grassley-press-administration-on-use-of-cell-phone-tracking-program 4/4