Qtnugrrsz of tht lttniteb states 3~taaljitzgtuu, 330t 20515 June 4, 2015 The Honorable Loretta Lynch Attorney General of the United States U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 The Honorable Vanita Gupta Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530 Dear Attorney General Lynch and Deputy Assistant Gupta: We write to request the Department of Justice investigate whether armed demonstrators outside of mosques violates the First Amendment rights of worshipers and i8 U.S. Code § 248, the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act. Last week nearly 250 anti-Muslim protestors, many armed with assault rifles, surrounded a mosque in Phoenix (see attached photos). This was the second armed demonstration at the mosque; the first instilled so much fear and intimidation that the mosque was forced to cancel religious services. The groups responsible for these hatefilled demonstrations have indicated that these demonstrations will be reoccurring in other parts of the country. We are deeply concerned that the conduct of these demonstrators impedes the First Amendment rights of worshipers at the mosque. Further, the presence of armed demonstrators shouting hate speech creates an environment that is likely to produce imminent violence. These demonstrators argue that they are exercising their First Amendment rights. What they fail to understand is that First Amendment rights are not absolute; they are limited to protect the safety and rights of others. The decision to bring assault weapons to the mosque demonstrates intent to create a hostile environment to intimidate worshipers, a clear attempt to infringe on the First Amendment rights of the worshipers and a possible violation of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE Act), which prohibits the use of “force or threat of force or by physical obstruction, intentionally injures, intimidates or interferes with or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with any PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER person lawfully exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship.” Armed protestors intimidating worshipers at churches, synagogues, mosques, or any religious place of worship seems to be exactly the behavior that Congress sought to outlaw when it passed the FACE Act. Enforcement of the law should not vary based on the religious affiliation of those being intimidated. The presence of assault weapons coupled with deep seeded bigotry and hate speech creates a clear and present danger to worshipers and threatens lawless action. The activity of these armed anti-Muslim demonstrators comes at a time when antiMuslim hate crimes are on the rise. As anti Muslim violence and bigotry sweep across the country, we must do everything we can to prevent further tragedy and discrimination. Sincerely, &~th blison Member of Congress iS U.S.C § 248 ¶ré C rson Member’ Congress A 3"