Exxon,  Chevron  and  ConocoPhillips:  25  Years  of  Rejecting  Shareholder  Concerns  on  Climate  Change Data  compiled  by  InsideClimate  News  reporters  Naveena  Sadasivam  and  Elizabeth  Douglass The  resolutions  included  in  this  list  are  focused  on  climate  change,  including  carbon  reductions,  climate  expertise  on  boards,  related  market  shifts  that  could  hurt  companies’  stock   value  and  lobbying/political  efforts  that  work  against  climate  solutions.  We  excluded  several  kinds  of  proposals  that  were  not  explicitly  climate  related,  even  though  they  were  relevant   to  climate  change.  Among  the  exclusions:  resolutions  on  hydraulic  fracturing,  drilling  in  the  Arctic,  election  contributions,  and  the  ability  of  shareholders  to  nominate  board  members.   Read  the  accompanying  story:  books.insideclimatenews.org/exxonsclimategamble Company Year Resolution  Topic Board's   Outcome Recommendation Resolution  Summary Exxon/  ExxonMobil Exxon  Corp. 1990 Shareholders  request  the  Board  to  issue  a  report  within  six  months,  which  describes  the  company   programs  and  progress  toward  acheiving  the  [CERES]  objectives.  [  1)  Protection  of  biosphere  2)   Environment:  CERES   Sustainable  use  of  natural  resources  3)  Reduction  and  disposal  of  wastes  4)  Wise  use  of  energy  5)  Risk   Vote  against principles reduction  6)  Marketing  and  safe  products  and  service  7)  Damage  compensation  8)Disclosure  9)   Environmental  directors  and  managers  10)  Assessment  and  annual  audit] Environment:   Hazardous   emissions,  risks  &   prevention Climate  Change:   Greenhouse  gas   emissions Exxon  Corp. 1990 Exxon  Corp. 1990 Exxon  Corp. 1990 Environment:  Toxic   chemicals Exxon  Corp. 1990 Environment:   Environment   committee Exxon  Corp. 1990 Environment:  Exxon   Valdez  cleanup Exxon  Corp. 1991 Environment:  Toxic   chemicals Exxon  Corp. 1991 Climate  Change:   Greenhouse  gas   emissions Exxon  Corp. 1991 Environment:  CERES   principles Exxon  Corp. 1992 Environment:  CERES   principles Exxon  Corp. 1994 Environment:   Human/social/envir onmental  concerns   regarding  mining Shareholders  request  to  Board  of  Directors  to  consider  disclosing  the  following  information  in  a   supplement  to  the  annual  report,  1)  All  measurable  emissions  from  all  Exxon  facilities  classified  as   Vote  against hazardous  by  the  Environmental  Protection  Agency  and  2)  All  hazardous  risk  assessment  and   prevention  programs  regarding  facilities  wholly  or  jointly  owned  or  operated  by  Exxon. Shareholders  of  Exxon  Corporation  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  develop  a  company-­‐wide  plan   to  reduce  carbon  dioxide  emissions  from  the  Company's  energy  production  plants  and  facilities   Vote  against worldwide. Shareholders  of  Exxon  Corporation  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  take  immediate  steps,  and   where  possible  eliminate,  the  toxic  chemicals  emitted  by  Exxon  facilities  in  the  U.S.  and  other   countries.  Be  it  further  resolved  that  the  shareholders  of  Exxon  Corp.  request  that  the  Board  of   Vote  against Directors  develop  a  toxic  chemicals  reduction  plan,  which  will  include  specific  steps,  programs  and   timetables  to  reduce  toxic  chemical  releases  at  the  company's  facilities. Shareholders  of  Exxon  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  pursue  the  necessary  procedures  to   establish  a  standing  Environmental  Affairs  Committee  of  the  Board  of  Directors  which  would  establish   Vote  against corporate  environmental  and  occupational  safety  and  health  policy  and  serve  as  an  ongoing  monitor   of  company  compliance  with  federal  and  state  laws  and  regulations. Shareholders  request  the  Directors  and  management  of  Exxon  to  honor  the  Company's  pledge  to   finish  the  cleanup,  to  support  scientific  research  to  assess  the  long-­‐term  damage  to  the  Alaskan   Vote  against environment  and  take  leadership  in  dealing  with  that  damage. Shareholders  of  Exxon  Corporation  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  take  immediate  steps,  and   where  possible  eliminate,  the  toxic  chemicals  emitted  by  Exxon  facilities  in  the  U.S.  and  other   Vote  against countries.  Be  it  further  resolved  that  the  shareholders  of  Exxon  Corp.  request  that  the  Board  of   Directors  develop  a  toxic  chemicals  reduction  plan,  which  will  include  specific  steps,  programs  and   timetables  to  reduce  toxic  chemical  releases  at  the  company's  facilities. Shareholders  of  Exxon  Corporation  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  develop  a  company-­‐wide  plan   to  reduce  carbon  dioxide  emissions  from  the  Company's  energy  production  plants  and  facilities   Vote  against worldwide. Shareholders  request  our  company  to-­‐-­‐  1.  Sign  and  actively  implement  the  Valdez  [CERES]  principles,   2.  Engage  with  shareholders,  CERES,  and  affected  communities  in  a  continuing  process  to  achieve  a   Vote  against genuine  and  publicly  trusted  measure  of  public  environmental  accountability. Shareholders  request  our  company  to-­‐-­‐  1.  Sign  and  actively  implement  the  Valdez  [CERES]  principles,   2.  Engage  with  shareholders,  CERES,  and  affected  communities  in  a  continuing  process  to  achieve  a   Vote  against genuine  and  publicly  trusted  measure  of  public  environmental  accountability. Shareholders  request  the  Board  of  Directors  to  provide  a  full  written  report  to  all  shareholders  within   four  months  of  the  1994  annual  meeting.  This  report  (not  directly  affecting  the  competitive  position   of  our  company)  shall  include  the  following  information  on  specific  aspects  of  our  mining  operations,   both  surface  and  underground.  1.  Human,  social  &  environmental  concerns  -­‐-­‐  In  areas  where  mining  is   currently  underway  and  in  proposed  operations,  describe  company  policies  regarding:  Impact  on   indigenous  peoples;  impact  on  those  elements  unique  to  specific  local  environments;  impact  on  any   sacred  sites  of  indigenous  communities.  What  is  our  company's  policy  regarding  claims  by  indigenous   Vote  against groups  to  lands  on  or  near  which  our  company  has  a  mining  operation?  In  view  of  the  potential   environmental  risks  of  mining  operations,  what  effort  is  our  company  making  to  minimize  these  in  the   localities  of  its  operations,  specifically  in  plans  for  reclamation  and  pollution  abatement?  2.  Local   Resistance  -­‐-­‐  For  each  current  mining  operation,  describe  our  company'  s  relationship  with  the   governments,  with  indigenous  groups,  and  with  private  citizens  in  the  mining  area.  Describe  the   nature  of  and  reason  (s)  for  public  opposition  to  our  company's  mining  operations,  wherever  this  may   occur.  (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/34088/0000950131-­‐94-­‐000279.txt) Voted  on Voted  on Voted  on,   Tally:  More   than  6% Voted  on Voted  on Voted  on Voted  on,   Tally:  More   than  6  % Voted  on,   Tally:  More   than  6  % Voted  on,   Tally:  6.3% Voted  on,   Tally:  7.9% Voted  on,   Tally:  6.0% Source:  Resolutions  compiled  from  Thomson  One  and  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  Vote  tallies  compiled  from  the  Interfaith  Center  on  Corporate  Responsibility  and   company  financial  filings. Shareholders  request  the  Board  of  Directors  to  provide  a  full  written  report  to  all  shareholders  within   four  months  of  the  1995  annual meeting.  This  report  (not  directly  affecting  the  competitive  position  of  our  company)  shall  include  the   following  information  on  specific  aspects  of  our  mining  operations,  both  surface  and  underground.  1.   Human,  social  &  environmental  concerns  -­‐-­‐  In  areas  where  mining  is  currently  underway  and  in   Environment:   proposed  operations,  describe  company  policies  regarding:  Impact  on  indigenous  peoples;  impact  on   Human/social/envir those  elements  unique  to  specific  local  environments;  impact  on  any  sacred  sites  of  indigenous   Vote  against onmental  concerns   communities.  What  is  our  company's  policy  regarding  claims  by  indigenous  groups  to  lands  on  or  near   regarding  mining which  our  company  has  a  mining  operation?  In  view  of  the  potential  environmental  risks  of  mining   operations,  what  effort  is  our  company  making  to  minimize  these  in  the  localities  of  its  operations,   specifically  in  plans  for  reclamation  and  pollution  abatement?  2.  Local  Resistance  -­‐-­‐  For  each  current   mining  operation,  describe  our  company'  s  relationship  with  the  governments,  with  indigenous   groups,  and  with  private  citizens  in  the  mining  area.  Describe  the  nature  of  and  reason  (s)  for  public   opposition  to  our  company's  mining  operations,  wherever  this  may  occur. Shareholders  request  that  a  committee  of  outside  directors  of  the  Board  institute  an  Executive   Environment:   Compensation  Review  and  prepare  a  report  available  to  shareholders  by  the  October  following  this   Environmental   year's  annual  meeting  with  the  results  of  the  Review  and  any  recommended  changes  in  practices.  The   Vote  against factors  and   report  shall  cover  pay,  benefits,  perks,  stock  options,  tax  advantages  and  any  special  arrangements  in   executive  pay the  compensation  packages  for  all  our  company's  top  officers. Shareholders  request  the  Board  to  create  a  committee  of  its  outside  directors  to  independently   review  (at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary  information)  and  make  available  to  shareholders   Climate  Change:   by  August,  1998  a  full  report  about  the  impact  of  climate  change  on  our  company's  present  policies   Vote  against Financial  risks and  practices.  Among  issues  to  be  treated  we  recommend  that  these  include  1)  any  anticipated   liabilities  our  company  may  incur  from  its  possible  contribution  to  the  problem;  2)  what  the  company   can  do  to  reduce  carbon  dioxide  emissions  from  our  fossil  fuels. Shareholders  request  the  Board  to  create  a  committee  of  its  outside  directors  to  independently   review  and  issue  (at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary  information)  a  full  report  to   Climate  Change:   shareholders  by  August,  1999  regarding  the  impact  of  climate  change  on  our  company's  present   Vote  against Financial  risks policies  and  practices.  We  recommend  the  following  issues  to  be  included:  1)  any  anticipated   liabilities  Exxon  may  incur  from  its  possible  contribution  to  the  problem;  2)  what  Exxon  can  do  to   reduce  carbon  dioxide  emissions  from  our  fossil  fuels. Shareholders  request  the  Board  of  Directors  to  adopt  a  company  policy  to  promote  renewable  energy   sources  consistent  with  the  newly-­‐created  Cabinet-­‐level  council  and  to  develop  strategic  plans  to  help   Climate  Change:   bring  bioenergy  and  other  renewable  energy  sources  into  Exxon's  energy  mix.  Shareholders  shall  be   Vote  against Renewable  energy kept  advised  regularly  as  to  the  ways  our  Company  is  moving  from  what  we  believe  is  its  existing  over-­‐ dependence  on  fossil  fuels  to  the  promotion  and  marketing  of  renewables. Shareholders  request  that  a  committee  of  outside  directors  of  the  board  institute  an  Executive   Compensation  Review  Committee  which  considers  social  and  environmental  concerns  in  determining   Environment:   compensation  for  top  executives.  A  report  should  be  made  available  to  shareholders  by  August  1,   Environmental   2000  with  the  results  of  the  Review.  We  recommend  that  the  review  include  changes  linked  to   Vote  against factors  and   disparities  between  increases  in  top  executives'  compensation  and  that  of  the  lowest  paid  workers   executive  pay (lowest  20%  globally)  as  well  as  to  environmental  liability  and  progress.  The  review  shall  cover  all  pay,   benefits,  perks,  stock  options  and  special  arrangements  in  the  compensation  packages  for  all   company's  top  officers. Exxon  Corp. 1995 Exxon  Corp. 1997 Exxon  Corp. 1998 Exxon  Corp. 1999 ExxonMobil 2000 ExxonMobil 2000 ExxonMobil 2000 Shareholders  request  that  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report  at  reasonable  cost  and  omiting   Environment:  Arctic   proprietary  information,  on  the  potential  environmental  damage  that  would  result  from  the  company   National  Wildlife   Vote  against proceeding  with  plans  to  drill  fro  oil  and  gas  in  the  coastal  plain,  1002  Area,  of  the  Arctic  National   Refuge Wildlife  Refuge.  The  report  should  also  cover  the  financial  costs  of  the  plan  and  the  expected  return. ExxonMobil 2001 Environment:   Environmental   factors  and   executive  pay ExxonMobil 2001 ExxonMobil 2001 ExxonMobil 2002 ExxonMobil 2002 ExxonMobil 2002 Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  Compensation  Committee  should  consider  non-­‐financial  factors,   including  social  and  environmental  concerns,  in  determining  compensation  for  top  executives.  We   Vote  against recommend  the  Committee  consider  setting  executive  performance  goals  that  take  into  account   disparities  between  increases  in  top  executives'  compensation  and  that  of  the  lowest  paid  workers,  as   well  as  to  environmental  liability  and  progress. Shareholders  request  that  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report  at  reasonable  cost  and  omiting   Environment:  Arctic   proprietary  information,  on  the  potential  environmental  damage  that  would  result  from  the  company   National  Wildlife   Vote  against drilling  for  oil  and  gas  in  the  coastal  plain  of  the  Arctic  National  Wildlife  Refuge.  The  report  should  also   Refuge cover  the  financial  costs  of  the  plan  and  the  expected  return. Shareholders  request  the  Board  of  Directors  to  adopt  a  company  policy  to  promote  renewable  energy   sources  consistent  with  the  Cabinet-­‐level  council  newly  created  to  enhance  renewable  energy  sources   Climate  Change:   and  to  develop  strategic  plans  to  help  bring  bioenergy  and  other  renewable  energy  sources  into   Vote  against Renewable  energy Exxon's  energy  mix.  Shareholders  request  the  be  kept  advised  regularly  as  to  the  ways  our  company  is   moving  from  its  self-­‐stated  'insignificant  percentage  of  the  company's  business'  in  renewable  energy   resources  to  the  promotion  and  marketing  of  renewables. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  Compensation  Committee  should  consider  non-­‐financial  factors,   Environment:   including  social  and  environmental  concerns,  in  determining  compensation  for  top  executives.  We   Environmental   Vote  against recommend  the  Committee  consider  setting  executive  performance  goals  that  take  into  account   factors  and   disparities  between  increases  in  top  executives'  compensation  and  that  of  the  lowest  paid  workers,  as   executive  pay well  as  to  environmental  liability  and  progress. Shareholders  request  the  Board  prepare  a  report  (at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary   Climate  Change:   information)  by  Sept.  1,  2002  outlining  how  it  will  promote  renewable  energy  sources  and  develop   Vote  against Renewable  energy strategic  plans  to  help  bring  bioenergy  and  other  renewable  energy  sources  into  ExxonMobil's  energy   mix. Shareholders  request  that  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report,  at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting   Environment:  Arctic   proprietary  information,  on  the  potential  environmental  damage  that  would  result  from  the  company   National  Wildlife   Vote  against drilling  for  oil  and  gas  in  the  Coastal  Plain  of  the  Arctic  National  Wildlife  Refuge.  The  report  should   Refuge also  cover  the  financial  costs  of  the  plan  and  the  expected  return. Voted  on,   Tally:  4.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  .0% Voted  on,   Tally:  4.5% Voted  on,   Tally:  5.3% Voted  on,   Tally:  6.2% Voted  on,   Tally:  7.7% Voted  on,   Tally:  5.4% Voted  on,   Tally:  9.5% Voted  on,   Tally:  9.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  8.9% Voted  on,   Tally:  7.9% Voted  on,   Tally:  20.2% Voted  on,   Tally:  6.6% Source:  Resolutions  compiled  from  Thomson  One  and  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  Vote  tallies  compiled  from  the  Interfaith  Center  on  Corporate  Responsibility  and   company  financial  filings. Shareholders  request  the  Board  to  prepare  a  report  (at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary   Climate  Change:   information)  by  September  2003  describing  any  operating,  financial  and  reputational  risks  to  the   Vote  against Climate  change  risks company  associated  with  climate  change  and  explaining  how  the  company  will  mitigate  those  risks." RESOLVED:  Shareholders  request  the  Board  prepare  a  report  (at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting   Climate  Change:   proprietary  information)  by  September  2003  explaining  how  the  company  will  respond  to  rising   Vote  against Renewable  energy regulatory,  competitive  and  public  pressure  to  significantly  develop  renewable  energy  sources. Climate  Change:   That,  by  the  2005  annual  shareholder  meeting,  the  Board  of  Directors  make  available  to  shareholders   Climate  science   all  research  data  relevant  to  ExxonMobil's  stated  position  on  the  science  of  climate  change,  omitting   Vote  against report proprietary  information  and  at  reasonable  cost. Shareholders  request  that  Exxon  Mobil  Corporation  (the  'Company')  prepare  and  submit  to   shareholders  of  the  Company  a  separate  report,  updated  annually,  containing  the  following   information:a.Policies  for  political  contributions  made  with  corporate  funds,  political  action   committees  sponsored  by  the  Company,  and  employee  political  contributions  solicited  by  senior   Climate  Change:   executives  of  the  Company.  This  shall  include,  but  not  be  limited  to,  policies  on  contributions  and   Political   donations  to  federal,  state,  and  local  political  candidates,  including  any  foreign  candidates,  political   Vote  against contributions/settin parties,  political  committees,  elected  officials  and  other  political  entities  organized  and  operating   g  energy  policy under  26  U.S.C.  Sec.  527;    b.An  accounting  of  the  Company's  resources  including  property  and   personnel  contributed  or  donated  to  any  of  the  persons  and  organizations  described  above;  c.A   business  rationale  for  each  of  the  Company's  political  contributions  or  donations;  and  d.  Identification   of  the  person  or  persons  in  the  Company  who  participated  in  making  the  decisions  to  contribute  or   donate. Shareholders  request  that  the  independent  directors  of  the  Board  of  ExxonMobil  prepare  a  report,  at   reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary  information,  on  the  potential  environmental  damage  that   Environment:   would  result  from  the  company  drilling  for  oil  and  gas  in  protected  areas  such  as  IUCN  Management   Environmental   Vote  against Categories  I-­‐IV  and  Marine  Management  Categories  I-­‐V,  national  parks,  monuments,  and  wildlife   impact/biodiversity refuges  (such  as  the  Arctic  National  Wildlife  Refuge),  and  World  Heritage  Sites.  The  report  should   consider  the  implications  of  a  policy  of  refraining  from  drilling  in  such  areas  and  should  be  available  to   investors  by  the  2006  annual  meeting. Climate  Change:   By  the  2006  annual  shareholder  meeting,  the  Board  of  Directors  make  available  to  shareholders  the   Climate  Science   research  data  relevant  to  ExxonMobil's  stated  position  on  the  science  of  climate  change,  omitting   Vote  against Report proprietary  information  and  at  reasonable  cost. Voted  on,   Tally:  22.2% ExxonMobil 2003 ExxonMobil 2003 ExxonMobil 2004 ExxonMobil 2004 ExxonMobil 2005 ExxonMobil 2005 ExxonMobil 2005 Climate  Change:   Shareholders  request  the  Board  undertake  a  comprehensive  review  and  publish  within  six  months  of   Kyoto   the  annual  meeting  a  report  on  how  ExxonMobil  will  meet  the  greenhouse  gas  reduction  targets  of   Vote  against Compliance/Greenh those  countries  in  which  it  operates  which  have  adopted  the  Kyoto  Protocol. ouse  gas  emissions Voted  On,   Tally:  28.4% 2006 Environment:   Environmental   factors  and   executive  pay Shareholders  request  the  Board's  Compensation  Committee,  when  setting  executive  compensation,   to  include  explicit  and  detailed  social  responsibility  and  environmental  (as  well  as  financial)  criteria   among  the  goals  that  executives  must  meet. Vote  against Voted  on,   Tally:  9.1% 2006 Environment:   Environmental   impact  to   communities Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  report,  at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary   information,  on  how  the  corporation  ensures  that  it  is  accountable  for  its  environmental  impacts  in  all   of  the  communities  where  it  operates.  The  report  should  contain  the  following  information:  1.  How   the  corporation  makes  available  reports  regarding  its  emissions  and  environmental  impacts  on  land,   Vote  against water,  and  soil  –  both  within  its  permits  and  emergency  emissions  –  to  members  of  the  communities   where  it  operates;  2.  How  the  corporation  integrates  community  environmental  accountability  into  its   current  code  of  conduct  and  ongoing  business  practices;  and  3.  The  extent  to  which  the  corporation’s   activities  have  negative  health  effects  on  individuals  living  in  economically-­‐poor  communities. Voted  on,   Tally:  10% 2006 Shareholders  request  that  the  independent  directors  of  the  Board  of  ExxonMobil  prepare  a  report  on   the  potential  environmental  damage  that  would  result  from  the  company  drilling  for  oil  ans  gas  in   Environment:   protected  areas  such  as  IUCN  management  categories  I-­‐IV  and  Marine  Managment  Categories  I-­‐V,   Environmental   Vote  against national  parks,  monuments  and  wildlife  refues  and  World  Heritage  Sites.  The  report  should  consider   impact/biodiversity the  implications  of  a  policy  of  refraining  from  drilling  in  such  areas  and  should  be  available  to   investors  by  the  2007  annual  meeting. Voted  on,   Tally:  8.5% 2007 Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  report,  at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary   information,  on  how  the  corporation  ensures  that  it  is  accountable  for  its  environmental  impacts  in  all   of  the  communities  where  it  operates.  The  report  should  contain  the  following  information:  1.  How   the  corporation  makes  available  reports  regarding  its  emissions  and  environmental  impacts  on  land,   Vote  against water,  and  soil  –  both  within  its  permits  and  emergency  emissions  –  to  members  of  the  communities   where  it  operates;  2.  How  the  corporation  integrates  community  environmental  accountability  into  its   current  code  of  conduct  and  ongoing  business  practices;  and  3.  The  extent  to  which  the  corporation’s   activities  have  negative  health  effects  on  individuals  living  in  economically-­‐poor  communities. Voted  on,   Tally:  9.8% ExxonMobil ExxonMobil ExxonMobil ExxonMobil ExxonMobil 2007 ExxonMobil 2007 ExxonMobil 2007 Environment:   Environmental   impact  to   communities Shareholders  request  the  Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals  based  on  current  technologies   for  reducing  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  Company's  products  and  operations;  and  that  the   company  report  to  shareholders  by  Sept.  30,  2007  on  its  plan  to  achieve  these  goals.  Such  a  report   would  omit  proprietary  information  and  be  prepared  at  a  reasonable  cost. Shareholders  request  that  Exxon  Mobil  Corporation  inform  its  customers  about  the  carbon  dioxide   Climate  Change:   (CO2)  emissions  generated  by  the  gasoline  or  the  diesel  fuel  they  buy.  The  quantitative  information   CO2  Information  at   would  be  provided  at  the  pump  and  based  on  average  well-­‐to-­‐wheels  figures,  i.  e.  encompassing  all   the  gas  pump phases,  from  extraction  up  to  and  including  consumption. Shareholders  request  that  ExxonMobil's  Board  adopt  a  policy  of  significantly  increasing  renewable   Climate  Change:   energy  sourcing  globally,  with  recommended  goals  in  the  range  of  between  15%-­‐25%  of  its  energy   Renewable  energy sourcing  by  between  2015-­‐2025. Climate  Change:   Greenhouse  gas   emissions Voted  on,   Tally:  21.3% Voted  on,   Tally:  8.8% Voted  on,   Tally:  9.5% Voted  on,   Tally:  8.1% Voted  On,   Tally:  10.3% Vote  against Voted  on,   Tally:  31.2% Vote  against Voted  on,   Tally:  .0% Vote  against Voted  on,   Tally:  7.3% Source:  Resolutions  compiled  from  Thomson  One  and  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  Vote  tallies  compiled  from  the  Interfaith  Center  on  Corporate  Responsibility  and   company  financial  filings. ExxonMobil 2008 ExxonMobil 2008 ExxonMobil 2008 ExxonMobil 2008 ExxonMobil 2008 ExxonMobil 2008 ExxonMobil 2008 ExxonMobil 2009 ExxonMobil 2009 ExxonMobil 2009 ExxonMobil 2010 ExxonMobil 2010 ExxonMobil 2010 ExxonMobil 2010 ExxonMobil 2010 ExxonMobil 2010 Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  report,  at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary   information,  on  how  the  corporation  ensures  that  it  is  accountable  for  its  environmental  impacts  in  all   Environment:   of  the  communities  where  it  operates.  The  report  should  contain  the  following  information:  how  the   Environmental   corporation  makes  available  reports  regarding  its  emissions  and  environmental  impacts  on  land,   Vote  against impact  to   water,  and  soil  –  both  within  its  permits  and  emergency  emissions  –  to  members  of  the  communities   communities where  it  operates;how  the  corporation  integrates  community  environmental  accountability  into  its   current  code  of  conduct  and  ongoing  business  practices;  and  the  extent  to  which  the  corporation’s   activities  have  negative  health  effects  on  individuals  living  in  economically-­‐poor  communities. Shareholders  request  that  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report,  at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting   Environment:  Arctic   proprietary  information,  on  the  potential  environmental  damage  that  would  result  from  the  company   National  Wildlife   Vote  against drilling  for  oil  and  gas  in  the  coastal  plain  of  the  Arctic  National  Wildlife  Refuge.  The  report  should   Refuge consider  the  implications  of  a  policy  of  refraining  from  drilling  in  this  area. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current   Climate  Change:   technologies,  for  reducing  total  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  Company’s  products  and   Greenhouse  gas   Vote  against operations;  and  that  the  Company  report  to  shareholders  by  September  30,  2008,  on  its  plans  to   emissions achieve  these  goals.  Such  a  report  will  omit  proprietary  information  and  be  prepared  at  reasonable   cost.” Resolved  that  Exxon  Mobil  Corporation  inform  its  customers  about  the  carbon  dioxide  (CO2)   Climate  Change:   emissions  generated  by  the  gasoline  or  the  diesel  fuel  they  buy.  The  quantitative  information  would   CO2  Information  at   Vote  against be  provided  at  the  pump  and  based  on  average  well-­‐to-­‐wheels  figures,  i.  e.  encompassing  all  phases   the  gas  pump from  extraction  up  to  and  including  consumption Shareholders  ask  ExxonMobil  Corp.'s  Board  of  Directors  to  establish  a  task  force,  which  should  include   both  (a)  two  or  more  independent  directors,  and  (b)  relevant  company  staff,  to  investigate  and  report   to  shareholders  on  the  likely  consequences  of  global  climate  change  between  now  and  2030  for   Climate  Change:   emerging  countries  and  poor  communities  in  these  countries  and  developed  countries,  and  compare   Climate  change  &   Vote  against these  outcomes  with  scenarios  in  which  ExxonMobil  takes  leadership  in  developing  sustainable   technology  report energy  technologies  that  can  be  used  by  and  for  the  benefit  of  those  most  threatened  by  climate   change.  The  report  should  be  prepared  at  reasonable  expense,  omitting  proprietary  information,  and   should  be  made  available  to  shareholders  by  March  31,  2009. Shareholders  request  ExxonMobil's  Board  of  Directors  establish  a  committee  to  study  steps  and  report   Climate  Change:   to  shareholders,  barring  competitiive  information  and  disseminated  at  a  reasonable  expense,  on  how   Energy  technology   ExxonMobil  can  become  the  industry  leader  within  a  reasonable  period  in  developing  and  making   Vote  against report available  the  technology  needed  (such  as  sequestration  and  engineered  geothermal)  to  enable  the   USA  to  become  energy  independent  in  an  environmentally  sustainable  way. Climate  Change:   That  ExxonMobil's  board  adopt  a  policy  for  renewable  energy  research,  developmetn  and  sourcing,   Vote  against Renewable  energy reporting  on  its  progress  to  investors  in  2009. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current   Climate  Change:   technologies,  for  reducing  total  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  company's  products  and   Greenhouse  gas   Vote  against operations;  and  that  the  company  report  to  shareholders  by  Sept.  30,  2009,  on  its  plans  to  achieve   emissions these  goals.  Such  a  report  will  omit  proprietary  information  and  be  prepared  at  a  reasonable  cost. Shareholders  ask  ExxonMobil  Corp.'s  Board  of  Directors  to  establish  a  task  force,  which  should  include   both  (a)  two  or  more  independent  directors,  and  (b)  relevant  company  staff,  to  investigate  and  report   to  shareholders  on  the  likely  consequences  of  global  climate  change  between  now  and  2030  for   Climate  Change:   emerging  countries  and  poor  communities  in  these  countries  and  developed  countries,  and  compare   Climate  change  &   Vote  against these  outcomes  with  scenarios  in  which  ExxonMobil  takes  leadership  in  developing  sustainable   technology  report energy  technologies  that  can  be  used  by  and  for  the  benefit  of  those  most  threatened  by  climate   change.  The  report  should  be  prepared  at  reasonable  expense,  omitting  proprietary  information,  and   should  be  made  available  to  shareholders  by  March  31,  2010. Climate  Change:   That  ExxonMobil's  board  adopt  a  policy  for  renewable  energy  research,  developmetn  and  sourcing,   Vote  against Renewable  energy reporting  on  its  progress  to  investors  in  2010. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  of  ExxonMobil  adopt  environmental  policies  to   Environment:   address  the  environmental  hazards  of  its  oil  and  gas-­‐related  activities  in  coastal  Louisiana  by  devising   Vote  against Coastal  Louisiana and  implementing  business  practices  that  will  prevent  future  harms  to  coastal  Louisiana  and  by  aiding   in  the  restoration  of  welands  lost  through  past  actions  by  ExxonMobil. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  prepare  a  report  discussing  possible  long-­‐term  risks  to  the   company's  finances  and  operations  posed  by  the  environmental,  social  and  economic  challenges   Environment:  Oil   associated  with  the  oil  sands.  The  report  be  prepared  at  reasonable  cost,  omit  proprietary  and  legal   Vote  against sands strategy  information,  address  risks  other  than  those  associated  with  or  attributable  to  climate  change,   and  be  available  to  investors  by  August  2010. Shareholders  request  ExxonMobil's  Board  of  Directors  establish  a  committee  to  study  steps  and  report   Climate  Change:   to  shareholders,  barring  competitiive  information  and  disseminated  at  a  reasonable  expense,  on  how   Energy  technology   ExxonMobil  can  become  the  industry  leader  within  a  reasonable  period  in  developing  and  making   Vote  against report available  the  technology  needed  (such  as  sequestration  and  engineered  geothermal)  to  enable  the   USA  to  become  energy  independent  in  an  environmentally  sustainable  way. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current   Climate  Change:   technologies,  for  reducing  total  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  company's  products  and   Greenhouse  gas   Vote  against operations;  and  that  the  company  report  to  shareholders  by  Sept.  30,  2010,  on  its  plans  to  achieve   emissions these  goals.  Such  a  report  will  omit  proprietary  information  and  be  prepared  at  a  reasonable  cost. Environment:   Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report  by  Oct.  1,  2010,  at  reasonable  cost   Environmental   and  omitting  proprietary  information,  summarizing:  1.  The  environmental  impact  of  fracturing   Vote  against effects  of  hydraulic   operations  of  ExxonMobil,  and  2.  Potential  policies  for  the  company  to  adopt,  above  and  beyond   fracturing regulatory  requirements,  to  reduce  or  eliminate  hazards  to  air  water,  and  soil  quality  from  fracturing. Shareholders  of  ExxonMobil  Corp  ask  the  Board  of  Directors  to  consider  in  its  strategic  planning   Climate  Change:   process  the  risk  that  demand  for  fossil  fuels  in  the  next  20  years  could  be  significantly  lower  than   Consider  lower-­‐ ExxonMobil  has  projected,  and  report  to  shareholders  (at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary   Vote  against demand  scenario information)  no  later  than  Nov.  31,  2010  on  how  such  demand  reduction  would  affect  ExxonMobil's   long-­‐term  strategic  plan. Voted  on,   Tally:  10.0% Voted  on,   Tally:  8.4% Voted  on,   Tally:  30.0% Voted  on,   Tally:  7.1% Voted  on,   Tally:  10.4% Voted  on,   Tally:  9.4% Voted  on,   Tally:  27.0% Voted  on,   Tally:  29.0% Voted  on,   Tally:  10.0% Voted  on,   Tally:  27.3% Voted  on,   Tally:  9.1% Voted  on,   Tally:  26.4% Voted  on,   Tally:  6.7% Voted  on,   Tally:  27.2% Voted  on,   Tally:  26.3% Voted  on,   Tally:  7.8% Source:  Resolutions  compiled  from  Thomson  One  and  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  Vote  tallies  compiled  from  the  Interfaith  Center  on  Corporate  Responsibility  and   company  financial  filings. ExxonMobil 2011 ExxonMobil 2011 ExxonMobil 2011 ExxonMobil 2011 ExxonMobil 2011 ExxonMobil 2012 ExxonMobil 2012 ExxonMobil 2013 ExxonMobil 2013 Shareholders  request  ExxonMobil's  Board  of  Directors  establish  a  committee  to  study  steps  and  report   to  shareholders  within  six  months  of  the  annual  meeting  (barring  competitiive  information  and   Climate  Change:   disseminated  at  a  reasonable  expense)  on  how  ExxonMobil,  within  a  reasonable  timeframe,  can   Energy  technology   become  the  recognized  industry  leader  in  developing  and  making  available  the  necessary  technology   Vote  against report and  products  to  become  an  environmentally  sustainable  energy  company  at  every  level  of  its   operation.  (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/exxonmobil-­‐sustainable-­‐strategy-­‐ 2011) the  shareholders  of  Exxon  Mobil  Corporation  (‘Company’)  hereby  request  that  the  Company  provide  a   report,  updated  semi-­‐annually,  disclosing  the  amounts  that  the  Company  has  paid  or  incurred  in   connection  with  influencing  legislation;  participating  or  intervening  in  any  political  campaign  on   behalf  of  (or  in  opposition  to)  any  candidate  for  public  office;  and  attempting  to  influence  the  general   Climate  change:   public,  or  segments  thereof,  with  respect  to  elections,  legislative  matters  or  referenda.  The  report   Lobbying/Political   should  include  (a)  contributions  to  or  expenditures  on  behalf  of  political  candidates,  political  parties,   Vote  against contributions political  committees  and  other  political  entities  and  (b)  the  portions  of  any  dues  or  other  payments   that  are  made  to  a  tax-­‐exempt  organization  for  an  expenditure  or  contribution  that,  if  made  directly   by  the  Company,  would  not  be  deductible  under  section  162(e)(1)  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Code.  The   report  should  identify  each  recipient,  the  amount  paid  to  each,  and  the  purpose  of  any  contribution   or  expenditure. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  prepare  a  report  discussing  possible  long-­‐term  risks  to  the   company's  finances  and  operations  posed  by  the  environmental,  social  and  economic  challenges   Environment:  Oil   associated  with  the  oil  sands.  The  report  should  be  prepared  at  reasonable  cost,  omit  proprietary  and   Vote  against sands legal  strategy  information,  address  risks  other  than  those  associated  with  or  attributable  to  climate   change,  and  be  available  to  investors  by  August  2011.  (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐ network/resolutions/exxonmobil-­‐oil-­‐sands-­‐2011) Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current   Climate  Change:   technologies,  for  reducing  total  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  company's  products  and   Greenhouse  gas   Vote  against operations;  and  that  the  company  report  to  shareholders  by  Sept.  30,  2011,  on  its  plans  to  achieve   emissions these  goals.  Such  a  report  will  omit  proprietary  information  and  be  prepared  at  a  reasonable  cost.   (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/exxonmobil-­‐ghg-­‐reduction-­‐goals-­‐2011) Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report  by  October  2011,  at  reasonable   Environment:   cost  and  omitting  confidential  information  such  as  proprietary  or  legally  prejudicial  data,   Environmental   summarizing:  1.  Known  and  potential  environmental  impacts  of  ExxonMobil's  fracturing  operations,   Vote  against effects  of  hydraulic   and  2.  Policy  options  for  our  company  to  adopt,  above  and  beyond  regulatory  requirements  and  our   fracturing company's  existing  efforts,  to  reduce  or  eliminate  hazards  to  air,  water,  and  soil  quality  from   fracturing. the  shareholders  of  Exxon  Mobil  Corporation  (‘Company’)  hereby  request  that  the  Company  provide  a   report,  updated  semi-­‐annually,  disclosing  the  amounts  that  the  Company  has  paid  or  incurred  in   connection  with  influencing  legislation;  participating  or  intervening  in  any  political  campaign  on   behalf  of  (or  in  opposition  to)  any  candidate  for  public  office;  and  attempting  to  influence  the  general   Climate  change:   public,  or  segments  thereof,  with  respect  to  elections,  legislative  matters  or  referenda.  The  report   Lobbying/Political   should  include  (a)  contributions  to  or  expenditures  on  behalf  of  political  candidates,  political  parties,   Vote  against contributions political  committees  and  other  political  entities  and  (b)  the  portions  of  any  dues  or  other  payments   that  are  made  to  a  tax-­‐exempt  organization  for  an  expenditure  or  contribution  that,  if  made  directly   by  the  Company,  would  not  be  deductible  under  section  162(e)(1)  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Code.  The   report  should  identify  each  recipient,  the  amount  paid  to  each,  and  the  purpose  of  any  contribution   or  expenditure. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current   Climate  Change:   technologies,  for  reducing  total  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  Company's  products  and   Greenhouse  gas   Vote  against operations;  and  that  the  Company  report  to  shareholders  by  November  30,  2012,  on  its  plans  to   emissions achieve  these  goals.  Such  a  report  will  omit  proprietary  information  and  be  prepared  at  reasonable   cost.  (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/exxonmobil-­‐ghg-­‐reduction-­‐goals-­‐2012) Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current   Climate  Change:   technologies,  for  reducing  total  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  Company's  products  and   Greenhouse  gas   Vote  against operations;  and  that  the  Company  report  to  shareholders  by  November  30,  2013,  on  its  plans  to   emissions achieve  these  goals.  Such  a  report  will  omit  proprietary  information  and  be  prepared  at  reasonable   cost.  (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/exxonmobil-­‐ghg-­‐reductions-­‐2013) Climate  change:   Lobbying The  shareholders  of  Exxon  Mobil  Corporation  (‘ExxonMobil’)  request  the  Board  authorize  the   preparation  of  a  report,  updated  annually,  disclosing:  1)  Company  policy  and  procedures  governing   lobbying,  both  direct  and  indirect,  and  grassroots  lobbying  communications  2)  Payments  by   ExxonMobil  used  for  (a)  direct  or  indirect  lobbying  or  (b)  grassroots  lobbying  communications,  in  each   Vote  against case  including  the  amount  of  the  payment  and  the  recipient.  3)  ExxonMobil’s  membership  in  and   payments  to  any  tax-­‐exempt  organization  that  writes  and  endorses  model  legislation  4)  Description  of   the  decision  making  process  and  oversight  by  management  and  the  Board  for  making  payments Voted  on,   Tally:  6.1%% Voted  on,   Tally:  23.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  27.1% Voted  on,   Tally:  26.5% Voted  on,   Tally:  28.2% Voted  on,   Tally:  23.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  27.1% Voted  on,   Tally:  26.7% Voted  on,   Tally:  24.9% The  shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  study  the  feasibility  of  adopting  a  policy   prohibiting  the  use  of  treasury  funds  for  any  direct  or  indirect  political  contributions  intended  to   Voted  on,   Vote  against influence  the  outcome  of  an  election  or  referendum,  and  report  to  shareholders  on  its  findings  by   Tally:  5.7% October  2013. Shareholders  request  the  Board  of  Directors  to  report  to  shareholders  by  Oct.  30,  2013,  and  annually   Environment:   thereafter,  using  multiple  quantitative  indicators,  the  results  of  company  procedures  and  practices,   Environmental   Voted  on,   ExxonMobil 2013 over  and  beyond  regulatory  requirements,  to  minimize  any  adverse  environmental  and  community   Vote  against impacts  of  hydraulic   Tally:  30.2% impacts  from  the  company's  natural  gas  extraction  operations  associated  with  shale  formations.  Such   fracturing reports  should  be  prepared  at  reasonable  cost  and  omit  confidential  information. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current   Climate  Change:   technologies,  for  reducing  total  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  Company's  products  and   Voted  on,   ExxonMobil 2014 Greenhouse  gas   Vote  against operations;  and  that  the  Company  report  to  shareholders  by  November  30,  2014,  on  its  plans  to   Tally:  22.0% emissions achieve  these  goals.  Such  a  report  will  omit  proprietary  information  and  be  prepared  at  reasonable   cost. Source:  Resolutions  compiled  from  Thomson  One  and  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  Vote  tallies  compiled  from  the  Interfaith  Center  on  Corporate  Responsibility  and   company  financial  filings. ExxonMobil 2013 Climate  change:   Political   contributions ExxonMobil 2014 ExxonMobil 2015 ExxonMobil 2015 ExxonMobil 2015 ExxonMobil 2015 Climate  change:   Lobbying The  shareholders  of  Exxon  Mobil  Corporation  (‘ExxonMobil’)  request  the  Board  authorize  the   preparation  of  a  report,  updated  annually,  disclosing:  1)  Company  policy  and  procedures  governing   lobbying,  both  direct  and  indirect,  and  grassroots  lobbying  communications  2)  Payments  by   ExxonMobil  used  for  (a)  direct  or  indirect  lobbying  or  (b)  grassroots  lobbying  communications,  in  each   Vote  against case  including  the  amount  of  the  payment  and  the  recipient.  3)  ExxonMobil’s  membership  in  and   payments  to  any  tax-­‐exempt  organization  that  writes  and  endorses  model  legislation  4)  Description  of   the  decision  making  process  and  oversight  by  management  and  the  Board  for  making  payments Shareholders  request  that,  as  elected  board  directors'  terms  of  office  expire,  the  ExxonMobil  Corp.'s   Nominating  Committee  nominate  for  board  election  at  least  one  candidate  who:  1)  Has  a  high  level  of   Climate  Change:   climate  change  expertise  and  experience  in  environmental  matters  relevant  to  hydrocarbon   Board  member  with   exploration  and  production,  related  risks,  and  alternative,  renewable  energy  sources  and  is  widely   Vote  against climate  change   recognized  in  the  business  and  environmental  communities  as  such,  as  reasonably  determined  by  the   expertise board,  and  2)  Will  qualify,  subject  to  exceptions  in  extraordinary  circumstances  explicitly  specified  by   the  board,  as  an  independent  director.  (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/exxon-­‐ board-­‐environmental-­‐expertise-­‐2015) Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current   Climate  Change:   technologies,  for  reducing  total  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  Company's  products  and   Greenhouse  gas   Vote  against operations;  and  that  the  Company  report  to  shareholders  by  November  30,  2015,  on  its  plans  to   emissions achieve  these  goals.  Such  a  report  will  omit  proprietary  information  and  be  prepared  at  reasonable   cost.  (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/exxon-­‐ghg-­‐goals-­‐2015) Shareholders  request  the  Board  of  Directors  report  to  shareholders  using  quantitative  indicators,  by   December  31,  2015,  and  annually  thereafter,  the  results  of  company  policies  and  practices,  above  and   Environment:   Vote  against beyond  regulatory  requirements,  to  minimize  the  adverse  environmental  and  community  impacts   Hydraulic  Fracturing from  the  company’s  hydraulic  fracturing  operations  associated  with  shale  formations.  Such  report   should  be  prepared  at  reasonable  cost,  omitting  confidential  information. Climate  change:   Lobbying The  shareholders  of  Exxon  Mobil  Corporation  (‘ExxonMobil’)  request  the  Board  authorize  the   preparation  of  a  report,  updated  annually,  disclosing:  1)  Company  policy  and  procedures  governing   lobbying,  both  direct  and  indirect,  and  grassroots  lobbying  communications  2)  Payments  by   ExxonMobil  used  for  (a)  direct  or  indirect  lobbying  or  (b)  grassroots  lobbying  communications,  in  each   Vote  against case  including  the  amount  of  the  payment  and  the  recipient.  3)  ExxonMobil’s  membership  in  and   payments  to  any  tax-­‐exempt  organization  that  writes  and  endorses  model  legislation  4)  Description  of   the  decision  making  process  and  oversight  by  management  and  the  Board  for  making  payments Voted  on,   Tally:  21.1% Voted  on,   Tally:  21% Voted  on,   Tally:  9.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  24.9% Voted  on,   Tally:  21% Chevron/ChevronTexaco Chevron  Corp 1992 Environment:  CERES   principles Chevron  Corp 1993 Environment:  CERES   principles Chevron  Corp 1994 Environment:   Environmental  and   safety  hazards Chevron  Corp 1995 Environment:   Environmental  and   safety  hazards Chevron  Corp 1997 Environment:  Arctic   National  Wildlife   Refuge Chevron  Corp 1999 Climate  Change:   Greenhouse  gas   emissions Chevron  Corp 2000 Climate  Change:   Greenhouse  gas   emissions Chevron  Corp 2000 Environment:  Arctic   National  Wildlife   Refuge Shareholders  request  a  report  1)  describing  management's  reactions  to  the  Valdez  [CERES]  principles   2)  describing  company  programs,  progress  and  plans  relative  to  each  of  these  principles  and  the   company's  own  policies  and  3)  reporting  information  in  the  format  of  the  CERES  report Shareholders  request  the  company  to  endorse  the  CERES  Principles  for  corporate  environmental   accountability Shareholders  request  the  company  to  make  publicly  available  a  report  sufficienty  comprehensive  to   permit  interested  persons  to  assess  1)  environmental  and  safety  hazards  to  communities  surrounding   its  plants,  such  as  risk  and  consequences  of  chemical  accidents,  preventative  measures  and  plans  to   reduce  the  use  of  toxics  2)  communities  rights  to  inspect  facilities  with  regard  to  these  hazards  3)   company  policy  and  procedures  in  these  areas Shareholders  request  the  Company  to  adopt  a  policy  to  make  publicly  available  at  each  facility   information  that  will  allow  concerned  persons  or  organizations  (i)  to  assess  that  facility's  (a)  actual   environmental  and  safety  hazards  to  local  communities,  (b)  pertinent  Company  policies  and   procedures,  and  (c)  arrangements  for  emergency  preparedness;  and  (ii)  inspect  such  facilities  with   regard  to  these  hazards. Shareholders  request  that  the  Management  and  Board  of  Directors  of  Chevron  Corporation   unconditionally  cancel  any  future  plans  for  oil  drilling  in  the  1002  area  and  immediately  stop  the   expenditure  of  any  corporate  funds  targeted  to  achieve  this  destructive  objective. Shareholders  of  Chevron  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  report  (at  reasonable  costs  and  omitting   proprietary  information),  to  shareholders  by  August  1999,  on  the  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  our   company's  own  operations  and  products,  including  (with  dollar  amounts  where  relevant)  1.  what  our   company  is  doing  in  research  and/or  action  to  reduce  those  emissions  and  ameliorate  the  problem;   the  financial  exposure  of  our  company  and  its  shareholders  due  to  the  likely  costs  of  reducing  those   emissions  and  potential  liability  for  damages  associated  with  climate  change,  and  actions  by  our   company,  or  by  the  industry  associations  to  which  it  pays  dues,  promoting  the  view  that  the  issue  of   climate  change  is  exaggerated,  not  real,  or  that  global  warming  may  be  beneficial. Shareholders  of  Chevron  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  report  (at  reasonable  costs  and  omitting   proprietary  information),  to  shareholders  by  August  2000,  on  the  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  our   company's  own  operations  and  products,  including  (with  dollar  amounts  where  relevant).  i)  what  our   company  is  doing  in  research  and/or  action  to  reduce  those  emissions  and  ameliorate  the  problem,   (ii)  the  financial  exposure  of  our  company  and  its  shareholders  due  to  the  likely  costs  of  reducing   those  emissions  and  potential  liability  for  damages  associated  with  climate  change,  and  (ii)  the   financial  exposure  of  our  company  and  its  shareholders  due  to  the  likely  costs  of  reducing  those   emissions  and  potential  liability  for  damages  associated  with  climate  change,  and  iii)  actions  by  our   company,  or  by  the  industry  associations  to  which  it  pays  dues,  promoting  the  view  that  the  issue  of   climate  change  is  exaggerated,  not  real,  or  that  global  warming  may  be  beneficial. Shareholders  request  that  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report  on  the  potential  environmental   damage  that  would  result  from  the  company  proceeding  with  plans  to  drill  for  oil  and  gas  in  the   coastal  plain,  1002  Area,  of  the  Arctic  National  Wildlife  Refuge.  The  report  should  also  cover  the   financial  costs  of  the  plan  and  the  expected  return. Vote  Against Voted  on,   Tally:  7.8% Vote  Against Voted  on Vote  Against Voted  on,   Tally:  6.6% Vote  Against Voted  on,   Tally:  5.6% Vote  Against Voted  on,   Tally:  4.8% Vote  Against Voted  on,   Tally:  7.4% Vote  Against Voted  on,   Tally:  8.8% Vote  Against Voted  on,   Tally:  7.1% Source:  Resolutions  compiled  from  Thomson  One  and  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  Vote  tallies  compiled  from  the  Interfaith  Center  on  Corporate  Responsibility  and   company  financial  filings. Chevron  Corp 2000 Chevron  Corp 2001 Chevron  Corp 2001 Chevron  Corp 2001 ChevronTexaco 2002 ChevronTexaco 2002 ChevronTexaco 2003 ChevronTexaco 2004 ChevronTexaco 2004 ChevronTexaco 2005 ChevronTexaco 2005 Chevron  Corp 2006 Chevron  Corp 2006 Chevron  Corp 2006 Environment:   Eliminate   bioaccumulated   halogenated   pollutants  at   facilities Shareholders  request  that  Chevron:  1.  Adopt  a  plan  for  virtual  elimination  of  bioaccumulative   halogenated  pollutants  at  its  major  facilities,  which  indentifies,  for  each  facility,  all  inputs  and  uses  of   chlorine  and  bromine,  any  sources  of  dioxine  and  other  bioaccumulative  pollutants  containing  these   Vote  Against compounds  in  the  facility,  and  any  options  that  may  eliminate  the  generation  of  these  pollutants.  2.   Provide  a  summary  report  to  shareholders  on  these  virtual  elimination  options  annually. Shareholders  of  Chevron  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  report  (at  reasonable  costs  and  omitting   proprietary  information),  to  shareholders  by  August  2001,  on  the  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  our   company's  own  operations  and  products,  including  (with  dollar  amounts  where  relevant)  (i)  what  our   Vote  Against company  is  doing  in  research  and/or  action  to  reduce  those  emissions  and  ameliorate  the  problem,   and  (ii)  the  financial  exposure  of  our  company  and  its  shareholders  due  to  the  likely  costs  of  reducing   those  emissions  for  damages  associated  with  climate  change. Shareholders  request  that  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report  on  the  potential  environmental   Environment:  Arctic   damage  that  would  result  from  the  company  proceeding  with  plans  to  drill  for  oil  and  gas  in  the   National  Wildlife   Vote  Against coastal  plain,  1002  Area,  of  the  Arctic  National  Wildlife  Refuge.  The  report  should  also  cover  the   Refuge financial  costs  of  the  plan  and  the  expected  return. Environment:   Shareholders  request  that  Chevron:  1.  Adopt  a  plan  for  virtual  elimination  of  bioaccumulative   Eliminate   halogenated  pollutants  at  its  major  facilities,  which  indentifies,  for  each  facility,  all  inputs  and  uses  of   bioaccumulated   chlorine  and  bromine,  any  sources  of  dioxine  and  other  bioaccumulative  pollutants  containing  these   Vote  Against halogenated   halogens  in  the  facility,  and  any  options  that  may  eliminate  the  generation  of  these  pollutants,  and  2.   pollutants  at   Provide  a  summary  report  to  shareholders  on  these  virtual  elimination  options  annually. facilities Shareholders  request  that  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report  on  the  potential  environmental   Environment:  Arctic   damage  that  would  result  from  the  company  proceeding  with  plans  to  drill  for  oil  and  gas  in  the   National  Wildlife   Vote  Against coastal  plain,  1002  Area,  of  the  Arctic  National  Wildlife  Refuge.  The  report  should  also  cover  the   Refuge financial  costs  of  the  plan  and  the  expected  return. Environment:   Shareholders  request  that  Chevron:  1.  Adopt  a  plan  for  virtual  elimination  of  bioaccumulative   Eliminate   halogenated  pollutants  at  its  major  facilities,  which  indentifies,  for  each  facility,  all  inputs  and  uses  of   bioaccumulated   chlorine  and  bromine,  any  sources  of  dioxine  and  other  bioaccumulative  pollutants  containing  these   Vote  Against halogenated   halogens  in  the  facility,  and  any  options  that  may  eliminate  the  generation  of  these  pollutants.  2.   pollutants  at   Provide  a  summary  report  to  shareholders  on  these  virtual  elimination  options  annually. facilities Shareholders  request  the  Board  to  prepare  a  report  (at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary   Climate  Change:   information),  by  September  1,  2003  explaining  how  the  company  will  respond  to  rising  regulatory,   Vote  Against Renewable  energy competitive  and  public  pressure  to  significantly  develop  renewable  energy  sources. Shareholders  request  the  Board  to  prepare  a  report  (at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary   Climate  Change:   information)  by  September  1,  2004  explaining  how  the  company  will  respond  to  rising  regulatory,   Vote  Against Renewable  energy competitive  and  public  pressure  to  significantly  develop  renewable  energy  sources.[supporting   material  mentions  emissions] A  report,  updated  annually,  disclosing  its  policies  for  political  contributions  (both  direct  and  indirect)   made  with  corporate  funds.  The  reports  shall  include,  but  not  be  limited  to,  contributions  and   donations  to  political  candidates,  political  parties,  political  committees  and  other  political  entities   Climate  Change:   organized  and  operating  under  26  USC  Sec.  527.  This  Report  shall  be  disclosed  to  shareholders   Review  of  public   Against through  the  Company’s  web  site  or  to  shareholders  in  published  form.  A  semi-­‐annual  report  of   policy  advocacy,  etc. political  contributions,  disclosing  monetary  and  non-­‐monetary  contributions  to  candidates,  parties,   political committees  and  other  organizations  and  individuals  described  in  paragraph  1. Climate  Change:   Greenhouse  gas   emissions Shareholders  instruct  ChevronTexaco  to  prepare  a  report,  at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary   information,  on  the  potential  environmental  damage  that  would  result  from  the  company  drilling  for   Environment:   oil  and  gas  in  protected  areas,  including  IUCN  Management  Catagories  I-­‐IV  and  Marine  Management   Drilling  in  sensitive   vote  against Categories  I-­‐V;  World  Heritage  Sites;  and  national  parks,  monuments,  and  wildlife  refuges.  The  report   &  protected  areas should  examine  the  possible  impacts  on  our  company's  value  from  decisions  to  do  business  in  these   areas.  The  report  should  be  available  to  investors  by  the  2006  annual  meeting. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report  on  new  initiatives  by  management   to  address  the  specific  health  and  environmental  concerns  of  communities  affected  by  unremediated   vote  against waste  and  other  sources  of  oil-­‐related  contamination  in  the  area  where  Texaco  operated. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  report  the  company's  a)  annual  expenditiures  by   category  for  each  year  from  1993  to  2005  for  attorneys'  fees,  expert  fees,  lobbying  and  public   Environment:   vote  against relations/media  expensies,  relating  in  any  way  to  the  health  and  environmental  consequences  of   Drilling  in  Ecuador hydrocarbon  exposures  and  Chevron's  remediation  of  Texaco  drilling  sites  in  Ecuador  and  b)   expenditures  on  the  remediation  of  the  Ecuador  sites. Shareholders  request  that  the  independent  directors  of  the  Board  of  Chevron  prepare  a  report,  at   reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary  information,  on  the  potential  environmental  damage  that   Environment:   would  result  from  the  company  drilling  for  oil  and  gas  in  protected  areas  such  as  IUCN  management   Drilling  in  protected   categories  I-­‐IV  and  Marine  Managment  Categories  I-­‐V,  national  parks,  monuments  and  wildlife  refuges   vote  against areas (such  as  the  Arctic  National  Wildlife  Refuge)  and  World  Heritage  Sites.  The  report  should  consider  the   implications  of  a  policy  of  refraining  from  drilling  in  such  areas  and  should  be  available  to  investors  by   the  2007  annual  meeting. Shareholders  request  that  the  Company  provide  a  report,  updated  semi-­‐annually,  disclosing  the   Company’s:  Policies  and  procedures  for  political  contributions  (both  direct  and  indirect)  made  with   corporate  funds.  Monetary  and  non-­‐monetary  contributions  to  political  candidates,  political  parties,   Climate  Change:   political  committees  and  other  political Review  of  public   Against entities  organized  and  operating  under  26  USC  Sec.  527  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Code  including  the   policy  advocacy,  etc. following:  An  accounting  of  where  contributions  went;  business  rationale  for  the  contribution;  and   who  decided.   Environment:   Drilling  in  Ecuador Voted  on,   Tally:  6.7% Voted  on,   Tally:  9.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  10.3% Voted  on,   Tally:  7.5% Voted  on,   Tally:  7.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  5.4% Voted  on,   Tally:  23.0% Voted  on Voted  on,   Tally:  8.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  8.7% Voted  on,   Tally:  9.2% Voted  on,   Tally:  8.4% Voted  on,   Tally:  8.7% Voted  on,   Tally:  13.2% Source:  Resolutions  compiled  from  Thomson  One  and  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  Vote  tallies  compiled  from  the  Interfaith  Center  on  Corporate  Responsibility  and   company  financial  filings. Chevron  Corp 2007 Chevron  Corp 2007 Chevron  Corp 2008 Chevron  Corp 2008 Chevron  Corp 2008 Chevron  Corp 2009 Chevron  Corp 2010 Chevron  Corp 2010 Chevron  Corp 2011 Chevron  Corp 2011 Chevron  Corp 2011 Chevron  Corp 2011 shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  publicly  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current   and  emerging  technologies,  for  reducing  total  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  company’s  products   Vote  Against and  operations  below  1990  levels;  and  that  the  company  report  to  shareholders  by  September  30,   2007,  on  its  plans  to  achieve  these  goals.  Such  a  report  will  omit  proprietary  information  and  be   prepared  at  reasonable  cost. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  prepare  a  report  by  November  2007,  prepared  at  reasonable   Environment:  Report   cost  and  omitting  proprietary  information,  on  the  policies  and  procedures  that  guide  Chevron's   on  environmental   Vote  Against assessment  of  the  adequacy  of  host  country's  laws  and  regulations  with  respect  to  their  adequacy  to   standards protect  human  health,  the  environment,  and  our  company's  reputation. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current   Climate  Change:   technologies,  for  reducing  total  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  Company's  products  and   Greenhouse  gas   Vote  Against operations;  and  that  the  Company  report  to  shareholders  by  September  30,  2008,  on  its  plans  to   emissions achieve  these  goals.  Such  a  report  will  omit  proprietary  information  and  be  prepared  at  reasonable   cost. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  prepare  a  report  by  November  2008,  prepared  at  reasonable   Environment:  Report   cost  and  omitting  proprietary  information,  on  the  policies  and  procedures  that  guide  Chevron's   on  environmental   Vote  Against assessment  of  the  adequacy  of  host  country's  laws  and  regulations  with  respect  to  their  adequacy  to   standards protect  human  health,  the  environment,  and  our  company's  reputation. Shareholders  request  that  an  independent  committee  of  the  Board  prepare  a  report,  at  reasonable   cost  and  omitting  proprietary  information,  on  the  environmental  damage  that  would  result  from  the   Environment:  Oil   company's  expanding  oil  sands  operations  in  the  Canadian  boreal  forest.  The  report  should  consider   Vote  Against sands the  implications  of  a  policy  of  discontinuing  these  expansions  and  should  be  available  to  investors  by   the  2009  annual  meeting. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  prepare  a  report  by  November  2009,  prepared  at  reasonable   Environment:  Report   cost  and  omitting  proprietary  information,  on  the  policies  and  procedures  that  guide  Chevron's   on  environmental   Vote  Against assessment  of  the  adequacy  of  host  country's  laws  and  regulations  with  respect  to  their  adequacy  to   standards protect  human  health,  the  environment,  and  our  company's  reputation. Investors  request  Chevron’s  Board  of  Directors  to  prepare  a  report  to  shareowners  on  the  financial   risks  resulting  from  climate  change  and  its  impacts  on  shareowner  value  over  time,  as  well  as  actions   Climate  Change:   the  Board  deems  necessary  to  provide  long-­‐term  protection  of  our  business  interests  and  shareowner   Vote  Against Financial  risks value.  The  Board  shall  decide  the  parameters  of  the  study  and  summary  report.  A  summary  report   will  be  made  available  to  investors  by  September  15,  2010. Shareholders  request  that,  as  the  terms  in  office  of  elected  board  directors'  terms  of  office  expire,  at   least  one  candidate  be  recommended  who:  1.  Has  a  high  level  of  expertise  and  experience  in   environmental  matters  relevant  to  hydrocarbon  exploration  and  production,  and  is  widely  recognized   Environment:  Board   in  the  business  and  environmental  communities  as  an  authority  in  such  field,  in  each  case  as   member  with   Vote  Against reasonably  determined  by  the  board,  and  2)  Will  qualify,  subject  to  limited  exceptions  in   environment   extraordinary  circumstances  explicitly  specified  by  the  board,  as  an  independent  director  under   expertise standards  applicable  to  the  company  as  a  NYSE  listed  company,  in  order  that  the  board  includes  at   least  one  director  satisfying  the  foregoing  criteria,  which  director  shall  have  designated  responsibility   on  the  board  for  environmental  matters. Chevron  should  include  sustainability  as  one  of  the  performance  measures  for  annual  and  long-­‐term   incentive  programs  for  senior  executives.  Sustainability  =  how  environmental,  social  and  financial   Climate  Change:   considerations  are  integrated  into  corporate  strategy  over  the  long  term.  [Supporting  statement  cites   Executive   Vote  Against National  Grid  for  partly  basing  executive  compensation  on  meeting  targets  for  reducing  carbon   compensation emissions.  (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/chevron-­‐executive-­‐compensation-­‐ 2011) Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report  by  October  2011,  at  reasonable   Environment:   cost  and  omitting  confidential  information  such  as  proprietary  or  legally  prejudicial  data,   Environmental   summarizing:  1.  Known  and  potential  environmental  impacts  of  Chevron's  fracturing  operations,  and   effects  of  shale/   Vote  Against 2.  Policy  options  for  our  company  to  adopt,  above  and  beyond  regulatory  requirements  and  our   hydraulic  fracturing   company's  existing  efforts,  to  reduce  or  eliminate  hazards  to  air,  water,  and  soil  quality  from   operations fracturing. Shareholders  request  that,  as  the  terms  in  office  of  elected  board  directors'  terms  of  office  expire,  at   least  one  candidate  be  recommended  who:  1.  Has  a  high  level  of  expertise  and  experience  in   environmental  matters  relevant  to  hydrocarbon  exploration  and  production,  and  is  widely  recognized   Environment:  Board   in  the  business  and  environmental  communities  as  an  authority  in  such  field,  in  each  case  as   member  with   Vote  Against reasonably  determined  by  the  board,  and  2)  Will  qualify,  subject  to  limited  exceptions  in   environment   extraordinary  circumstances  explicitly  specified  by  the  board,  as  an  independent  director  under   expertise standards  applicable  to  the  company  as  a  NYSE  listed  company,  in  order  that  the  board  includes  at   least  one  director  satisfying  the  foregoing  criteria,  which  director  shall  have  designated  responsibility   on  the  board  for  environmental  matters. Environment:  Report   Shareholders  request  that  Chevron  Corp.  recommendt  preparation  and  delivery  to  all  shareholders  a   on  offshore  wells   report  that  includes:  a.  The  numbers  of  all  offshore  wells  (exploratory,  production,  and  out-­‐of-­‐ and  costs  for   production)  that  Chevron  Corp.  owns  or  has  partnership  in,  b.  Current  and  projected  expenditures  for   Vote  Against effective  oil  spill   remedial  maintenance  and  inspection  of  out-­‐of-­‐production  wells,  and  c.  Cost  of  research  to  find   containment effective  containment  and  reclamation  following  marine  oil  spills. Climate  Change:   Greenhouse  gas   emissions Voted  on,   Tally:  8.5% Voted  on,   Tally:  8.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  10.4% Voted  on,   Tally:  8.3% Voted  on,   Tally:  28.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  8.8% Voted  on,   Tally:  8.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  26.8% Voted  on,   Tally:  5.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  40.5% Voted  on,   Tally:  24.8% Voted  on,   Tally:  8.6% Source:  Resolutions  compiled  from  Thomson  One  and  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  Vote  tallies  compiled  from  the  Interfaith  Center  on  Corporate  Responsibility  and   company  financial  filings. Chevron  Corp 2012 Chevron  Corp 2012 Chevron  Corp 2012 Chevron  Corp 2013 Chevron  Corp 2013 Stockholders  request  that  the  Board  authorize  the  preparation  of  a  report  updated  annually,   disclosing:  1.  Company  policy  and  procedures  governing  the  lobbying  of  legislators  and  regulators,   including  that  done  on  our  company's  behalf  by  trade  associations.  The  disclosure  whould  include   both  direct  and  indirect  lobbying  and  grassroots  lobbying  communications.  2.  A  listing  of  payments   (both  direct  and  indirect,  including  payments  to  trade  associations)  used  for  direct  lobbying  as  well  as   grassroots  lobbying  communications,  including  the  amount  of  the  payment  and  the  recipient.  3.   Membership  in  and  payments  to  any  tax-­‐exempt  organization  that  writes  and  endorses  model   Climate  Change:   legislation.  4.  Description  of  the  decision-­‐making  process  and  oversight  by  the  management  and   Vote  Against Lobbying   board  for  a.  Direct  and  indirect  lobbying  contribution  or  expenditure;  and  b.  Payment  for  grassroots   lobbying  expenditure.  For  the  purposes  of  this  proposal,  a  "grassroots  lobbying  communication"  is  a   communication  directed  to  the  general  public  that  (a)  refers  to  specific  legislation,  (b)  reflects  a  view   on  the  legislation,  and  (c)  encourages  the  recipient  of  the  communication  to  take  action  with  respect   to  the  legislation.  Both  "direct  and  indirect  lobbying"  and  "grassroots  lobbying  communications"   include  efforts  at  the  local,  state  and  federal  levels.  The  report  shall  be  presented  to  the  Audit   Committee  of  the  Board  or  other  relevant  oversight  committee  of  the  Board  and  posted  on  the   company's  website. Environment:   Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report  to  investors  by  September  2012,  at   Environmental   reasonable  cost  and  excluding  confidential  or  legally  prejudicial  data,  on  the  short-­‐term  and  long-­‐term   Vote  Against effects  of  shale/   risks  to  Chevron  Corp.'s  operations,  finances  and  gas  exploration  associated  with  community   hydraulic  fracturing   concerns,  known  regulatory  impacts,  moratoriums,  and  public  opposition  to  hydraulic  fracturing  and   operations related  natural  gas  development. Shareholders  request  that,  as  elected  board  directors'  terms  of  office  of  expire,  at  least  one  candidate   be  recommended  who:  1.  Has  a  high  level  of  expertise  and  experience  in  environmental  matters   Climate  Change:   relevant  to  hydrocarbon  exploration  and  production,  and  is  widely  recognized  in  the  business  and   Board  member  with   environmental  communities  as  an  authority  in  such  field,  in  each  case  as  reasonably  determined  by   Vote  Against climate  change   the  board,  and  2)  Will  qualify,  subject  to  limited  exceptions  in  extraordinary  circumstances  explicitly   expertise specified  by  the  board,  as  an  independent  director  under  standards  applicable  to  the  company  as  a   NYSE  listed  company,  in  order  that  the  board  includes  at  least  one  director  satisfying  the  foregoing   criteria,  which  director  shall  have  designated  responsibility  on  the  board  for  environmental  matters. Shareholders  request  that  a  committee  of  independent  members  of  the  Board  of  Directors  review  the   exposure  and  vulnerability  of  our  company's  facilities  and  operations  to  climate  risk  &  issue  a  report   Climate  Change:   to  shareholders  (at  a  reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary  information)  that  reviews  and   Physical  risks  of   estimates  the  costs  of  the  disaster  risk  management  and  adaptation  steps  the  company  is  taking,  and   Vote  Against climate  change plans  to  take,  to  reduce  exposure  &  vulnerability  to  climate  change  and  to  increase  resilience  to  the   potential  adverse  impacts  of  climate  extremes.  (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐ network/resolutions/chevron-­‐climate-­‐risk-­‐2013) Environment:   Shareholders  request  the  Board  of  Directors  to  report  to  shareholders  by  Oct.  30,  2013,  via   Environmental   quantitative  indicators,  the  results  of  company  procedures  and  practices,  over  and  beyond  regulatory   effects  of  shale/   requirements,  to  minimize  any  adverse  environmental  and  community  impacts  from  the  company's   Vote  Against hydraulic  fracturing   shale  energy  operations.  Such  reports  should  be  prepared  at  reasonable  cost  and  omittin  confidential   operations information  such  as  proprietary  or  legally  prejudicial  data. Voted  on,   Tally:  23.3% Voted  on,   Tally:  27.9% Voted  on,   Tally:  21.5% Voted  on,   Tally:  7.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  30.2% Chevron  Corp 2013 Shareholders  request  that,  as  elected  board  directors'  terms  of  office  of  expire,  at  least  one  candidate   be  recommended  who:  1.  Has  a  high  level  of  expertise  and  experience  in  environmental  matters   Climate  Change:   relevant  to  hydrocarbon  exploration  and  production,  and  is  widely  recognized  in  the  business  and   Board  member  with   environmental  communities  as  an  authority  in  such  field,  in  each  case  as  reasonably  determined  by   Vote  Against climate  change   the  board,  and  2)  Will  qualify,  subject  to  limited  exceptions  in  extraordinary  circumstances  explicitly   expertise specified  by  the  board,  as  an  independent  director  under  standards  applicable  to  the  company  as  a   NYSE  listed  company,  in  order  that  the  board  includes  at  least  one  director  satisfying  the  foregoing   criteria,  which  director  shall  have  designated  responsibility  on  the  board  for  environmental  matters. Voted  on,   Tally:  21.7%% Chevron  Corp 2013 Environment:  Report   Shareholders  request  that  Chevron  Corp.  recommendt  preparation  and  delivery  to  all  shareholders  a   on  offshore  wells   report  that  includes:  a.  The  numbers  of  all  offshore  wells  (exploratory,  production,  and  out-­‐of-­‐ and  costs  for   production)  that  Chevron  Corp.  owns  or  has  partnership  in,  b.  Current  and  projected  expenditures  for   Vote  Against effective  oil  spill   remedial  maintenance  and  inspection  of  out-­‐of-­‐production  wells,  and  c.  Cost  of  research  to  find   containment effective  containment  and  reclamation  following  marine  oil  spills. Voted  on,   Tally:  7.3% Chevron  Corp 2013 Stockholders  request  that  the  Board  authorize  the  preparation  of  a  report  updated  annually,   disclosing:  1.  Company  policy  and  procedures  governing  the  lobbying  of  legislators  and  regulators,   including  that  done  on  our  company's  behalf  by  trade  associations.  The  disclosure  whould  include   both  direct  and  indirect  lobbying  and  grassroots  lobbying  communications.  2.  A  listing  of  payments   (both  direct  and  indirect,  including  payments  to  trade  associations)  used  for  direct  lobbying  as  well  as   grassroots  lobbying  communications,  including  the  amount  of  the  payment  and  the  recipient.  3.   Membership  in  and  payments  to  any  tax-­‐exempt  organization  that  writes  and  endorses  model   Climate  Change:   legislation.  4.  Description  of  the  decision-­‐making  process  and  oversight  by  the  management  and   Vote  Against Lobbying  disclosure board  for  a.  Direct  and  indirect  lobbying  contribution  or  expenditure;  and  b.  Payment  for  grassroots   lobbying  expenditure.  For  the  purposes  of  this  proposal,  a  "grassroots  lobbying  communication"  is  a   communication  directed  to  the  general  public  that  (a)  refers  to  specific  legislation,  (b)  reflects  a  view   on  the  legislation,  and  (c)  encourages  the  recipient  of  the  communication  to  take  action  with  respect   to  the  legislation.  Both  "direct  and  indirect  lobbying"  and  "grassroots  lobbying  communications"   include  efforts  at  the  local,  state  and  federal  levels.  The  report  shall  be  presented  to  the  Audit   Committee  of  the  Board  or  other  relevant  oversight  committee  of  the  Board  and  posted  on  the   company's  website. Voted  on,   Tally:  24.4% Source:  Resolutions  compiled  from  Thomson  One  and  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  Vote  tallies  compiled  from  the  Interfaith  Center  on  Corporate  Responsibility  and   company  financial  filings. Chevron  Corp 2014 Chevron  Corp 2014 Chevron  Corp 2014 Chevron  Corp 2015 Chevron  Corp 2015 Chevron  Corp 2015 Chevron  Corp 2015 Chevron  Corp 2015 Shareholders  request  that,  as  elected  board  directors'  terms  of  office  of  expire,  at  least  one  candidate   be  recommended  who:  1.  Has  a  high  level  of  expertise  and  experience  in  environmental  matters   relevant  to  hydrocarbon  exploration  and  production,  and  is  widely  recognized  in  the  business  and   Climate  Change:   environmental  communities  as  an  authority  in  such  field,  in  each  case  as  reasonably  determined  by   Board  member  with   the  board,  and  2)  Will  qualify,  subject  to  limited  exceptions  in  extraordinary  circumstances  explicitly   Vote  Against climate  change   specified  by  the  board,  as  an  independent  director  under  standards  applicable  to  the  company  as  a   expertise NYSE  listed  company,  in  order  that  the  board  includes  at  least  one  director  satisfying  the  foregoing   criteria,  which  director  shall  have  designated  responsibility  on  the  board  for  environmental  matters.   (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/chevron-­‐board-­‐member-­‐with-­‐env-­‐expertise) Review  public  policy  advocacy  on  energy  policy  &  climate  change  position  and  report  by  Sept.  2014.   Chevron's  independent  board  members  commission  a  comprehensive  review  of  the  company's   positions,  oversight  and  processes  related  to  public  policy  advocacy  on  energy  policy  and  climate   Climate  Change:   change.  The  review  is  to  include:  whether  our  company  positions  on  climate  legislation  &  regulation   Lobbying  and   Vote  Against are  consistent  with  the  reductions  deemed  necessary  by  the  IPCC;  board  oversight  of  public  policy   political  spending advocacy  on  climate;  direct/indirect  expenditures  for  issue  ads  designed  to  influence  elections,  ballot   initiatives  or  legislation  related  to  climate  change;  engagements  with  climate  scientists  and  other   stakeholders  involved  in  climate  policy  discussions;  proposed  actions  to  be  taken  as  a  result  of  the   review. Environment:   Shareholders  request  the  Board  of  Directors  to  report  to  shareholders  by  Oct.  30,  2014,  and  annually   Environmental   thereafter,  the  results  of  company  procedures  and  practices,  over  and  beyond  regulatory   effects  of  shale/   requirements,  to  minimize  the  adverse  water  resource  and  community  impacts  from  the  company's   Vote  Against hydraulic  fracturing   hydraulic  fracturing  operations.  Such  reports  should  be  prepared  at  reasonable  cost,  omitting   operations confidential  information. Climate  Change:   Appoint  board   member  with   climate  expertise Shareholders  request  that,  as  elected  board  directors'  terms  of  office  of  expire,  at  least  one  candidate   be  recommended  who:  1.  Has  a  high  level  of  expertise  and  experience  in  environmental  matters   relevant  to  hydrocarbon  exploration  and  production,  and  is  widely  recognized  in  the  business  and   environmental  communities  as  an  authority  in  such  field,  in  each  case  as  reasonably  determined  by   the  board,  and  2)  Will  qualify,  subject  to  limited  exceptions  in  extraordinary  circumstances  explicitly   Vote  Against specified  by  the  board,  as  an  independent  director  under  standards  applicable  to  the  company  as  a   NYSE  listed  company,  in  order  that  the  board  includes  at  least  one  director  satisfying  the  foregoing   criteria,  which  director  shall  have  designated  responsibility  on  the  board  for  environmental  matters.   (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/chevron-­‐add-­‐board-­‐member-­‐w-­‐env-­‐expertise) Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  adopt  long-­‐term,  quantitative,  company-­‐wide   targets  for  reducing  greenhouse  gas  emissions  in  products  and  operations  that  take  into  consideration   the  global  commitment  (as  embodied  in  the  Copenhagen  Accord)  to  limit  warming  to  2  degrees  C  and   Vote  Against issue  a  report  by  November  30,  2015,  at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary  information,  on  its   plans  to  achieve  these  targets. Climate  Change:   Adopt  and  issue  a  dividend  policy  increasing  the  amount  authorized  for  capital  distribution  to   Stranded   shareholders  in  light  of  the  growing  potential  for  stranded  assets  and  decreasing  profitability   Vote  Against assets/Financial  risk   associated  with  capital  expenditures  on  high  cost,  unconventional  projects.   of  climate  change (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/chevron-­‐carbon-­‐asset-­‐risk-­‐2015) Stockholders  of  Chevron  Corp.  request  that  the  Board  authorize  the  preparation  of  a  report,  updated   annually,  disclosing:  1.  Company  policy  and  procedures  governing  lobbying,  both  direct  and  indirect,   and  grassroots  lobbying  communications.  2.  Payments  by  Chevron  used  for  a)  direct  or  indirect   lobbying  or  b)  grassroots  lobbying  communications,  in  each  case  including  the  amount  of  the   payment  and  the  recipient.  3.  Chevron's  membership  in  and  payments  to  any  tax-­‐exempt  organization   that  writes  and  endorses  model  legislation.  4.  Description  of  management's  and  the  Board's  decision-­‐ Climate  Change:   making  process  and  oversight  for  making  payments  described  in  sections  2  and  3  above.  For  purposes   Lobbying  and   Vote  Against of  this  proposal,  a  "grassroots  lobbying  communication"  is  a  communication  direct  to  the  general   political  spending public  that  a)  refers  to  specific  legislation  or  regulation  b)  reflects  a  view  on  the  legislation  or   regulation  and  c)  encourages  the  recipient  of  the  communication  to  take  action  with  respect  to  the   legislation  or  regulation  "indirect  lobbying"  is  lobbying  engaged  in  by  a  trade  association  or  other   organization  of  which  Chevron  is  a  member.  Both  "direct  and  indirect  lobbying"  and  "grassroots   lobbying  communications"  include  efforts  at  the  local,  state  and  federal  levels.  The  report  shall  be   presented  to  the  Audit  Committee  or  other  relevant  oversight  committees  and  posted  on  Chevron's   website. Shareholders  request  the  Board  of  Directors  to  report  to  shareholders  via  quantitative  indicators  on   Environment:   all  shale  plays  where  it  is  operating,  by  Sept.  30,  2015,  and  annually  thereafter,  the  results  of  company   Environmental   procedures  and  practices,  above  and  beyond  regulatory  requirements,  to  minimize  the  adverse  water   effects  of  shale/   Vote  Against resource  and  community  impacts  from  the  company's  hydraulic  fracturing  operations  associated  with   hydraulic  fracturing   shale  formations.  Such  reports  should  be  prepared  at  reasonable  cost,  omitting  confidential   operations information. Climate  Change:   Greenhouse  gas   emissions Phillips  Petroleum/ConocoPhillips Voted  on,   Tally:  21.4% Voted  on,   Tally:  24.1% Voted  on,   Tally:  26.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  20.0% Voted  on,   Tally:  9.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  4.0% Voted  on,   Tally:  28.0% Voted  on,   Tally:  27.0% Shareholders  request  the  company  to:  1)  Sign  and  actively  implement  the  Valdez  principles  [known   Phillips   Environment:  CERES   subsequenty  as  the  CERES  principles]  2)  engage  with  shareholders,  CERES  and  the  affected   Petroleum   1992 Vote  against Voted  on principles communities  in  a  continuing  process  to  achieve  a  genuine  and  publicly  trusted  measures  of  public   Company environmental  accountability. Phillips   Environment:  CERES   Stockholders  request  the  Company  to  endorse  the  CERES  Principles  for  corporate  environmental   Petroleum   1993 Vote  against Voted  on principles accountability. Company Phillips   Environment:  CERES   Stockholders  request  the  Company  to  endorse  the  CERES  Principles  for  corporate  environmental   Petroleum   1994 Vote  against Voted  on principles accountability. Company Phillips   Shareholders  request  the  Company  to  endorse  the  CERES  Principles  as  a  part  of  its  commitment  to  be   Environment:  CERES   Petroleum   1995 publicly  accountable  for  its  environmental  impact.   Vote  against Voted  on principles Company (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/78214/0000078214-­‐95-­‐000010.txt) Source:  Resolutions  compiled  from  Thomson  One  and  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  Vote  tallies  compiled  from  the  Interfaith  Center  on  Corporate  Responsibility  and   company  financial  filings. Phillips   Petroleum   Company 2002 ConocoPhillips 2004 ConocoPhillips 2006 ConocoPhillips 2006 ConocoPhillips 2007 ConocoPhillips 2007 ConocoPhillips 2007 ConocoPhillips 2007 ConocoPhillips 2008 Environment:  Arctic   Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report,  at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting   National  Wildlife   proprietary  information,  on  the  potential  environmental  damage  that  would  result  from  the  company   Vote  Against Refuge drilling  for  oil  and  gas  in  the  Coastal  Plain  of  the  Arctic  National  Wildlife. Shareholders  request  that  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report,  at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting   proprietary  information,  on  the  potential  environmental  damage  that  would  result  from  drilling  for  oil   Environment:  Arctic   and  gas  in  the  coastal  plain  of  the  Arctic  National  Wildlife  Refuge.  The  report  should  examine  the   National  Wildlife   financial  costs  and  expected  return  from  drilling  in  the  Arctic  Refuge,  as  well  as  the  possible  impacts   Vote  against Refuge to  our  company’s  value  from  such  an  action.   (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312504054977/ddef14a.htm#tx51780_2 3) Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report,  at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting   proprietary  information,  on  the  potential  environmental  damage  that  would  result  from  drilling  for  oil   Environment:  Arctic   and  gas  in  the  areas  inside  the  National  Petroleum  Reserve  —  Alaska  originally  protected  by  the  1998   National  Wildlife   ROD.  The  report  should  consider  the  implications  of  a  policy  of  refraining  from  drilling  in  such  areas   Vote  against Refuge and  should  be  available  to  investors  by  the  2007  annual  meeting.   (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312506071789/ddef14a.htm#toc97463_ 23) Board  of  Directors  to  report  to  shareholders  on  how  the  corporation  ensures  that  it  is  accountable  for   its  environmental  impacts  in  all  of  the  communities  where  it  operates.  The  report  should  contain  the   following  information:  1.  how  the  corporation  makes  available  reports  regarding  its  emissions  and   Environment:   environmental  impacts  on  land,  water,  and  soil  —  both  within  its  permits  and  emergency  emissions  —   Environmental   to  members  of  the  communities  where  it  operates;  2.  how  the  corporation  integrates  community   Vote  against impact  to   environmental  accountability  into  its  current  code  of  conduct  and  ongoing  business  practices;  and  3.   communities the  extent  to  which  the  corporation’s  activities  have  negative  health  effects  on  individuals  living  in   economically-­‐poor  communities.   (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312506071789/ddef14a.htm#toc97463_2 3) Shareholders  request  the  Board  to  prepare  a  report  (at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting  proprietary   information)  by  September  1,  2007  explaining  how  the  company  will  respond  to  rising  regulatory,   Climate  Change:   Vote  against competitive  and  public  pressure  to  significantly  develop  renewable  energy  sources.   Renewable  energy (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312507071693/ddef14a.htm#toc39549_2 9) Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report,  at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting   proprietary  information,  on  the  potential  environmental  damage  that  would  result  from  drilling  for  oil   Environment:  Arctic   and  gas  in  the  area  inside  the  National  Petroleum  Reserve  —  Alaska  originally  protected  by  the  1998   National  Wildlife   ROD.  The  report  should  consider  the  implications  of  a  policy  of  refraining  from  drilling  in  such  areas   Vote  against Refuge and  should  be  available  to  investors  by  the  2008  annual  meeting.   (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312507071693/ddef14a.htm#toc39549_ 29) shareholders  request  the  Board  of  Directors  to  report  to  shareholders,  at  reasonable  cost  and   omitting  proprietary  information,  on  how  the  corporation  ensures  that  it  is  accountable  for  its   environmental  impacts  in  all  of  the  communities  where  it  operates.  The  report  should  contain  the   following  information:  1)  how  the  corporation  makes  available  reports  regarding  its  emissions  and   Environment:   environmental  impacts  on  land,  water,  and  soil  —  both  within  its  permits  and  emergency  emissions  —   Environmental   Vote  against to  members  of  the  communities  where  it  operates;  2)  how  the  corporation  integrates  community   impact  to   environmental  accountability  into  its  current  code  of  conduct  and  ongoing  business  practices;  and  the   communities extent  to  which  the  corporation’s  activities  have  negative  health  effects  on  individuals  living  in   economically  poor  communities.   (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312507071693/ddef14a.htm#toc39549_2 9) Sharholders  request  that  the  compny  provide  a  report,  updated  semi-­‐annually,  dislosing  Conoco's:  1.   Policies  and  procedures  for  political  contributions  and  expenditures  (both  direct  and  indirect)  made   with  corporate  funds.  2.  Monetary  and  non-­‐monetary  political  contributions  and  expenditures  not   deductible  under  162  (e)  (1)  (B)  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Code,  including,  but  not  limited  to   contributions  to  or  expenditures  on  behalf  of  political  candidates,  political  parties,  political   committees  and  other  political  entities  organized    and  operating  under  26  USC  Sec.  527  of  the  Internal   Climate  Change:   Revenue  Code  and  any  portion  of  any  dues  or  similar  payments  made  to  any  tax-­‐exempt  organization   lobbying/political   that  is  used  for  an  expenditure  or  contribution  if  made  directly  by  the  corporation  would  not  be   Vote  against contributions deductible  under  section  161  (e)  (1)(B)  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Coe.  The  report  shall  include  the   following:  a.  An  accounting  of  Conoco's  funds  that  are  used  for  political  contributions  or  expenditures   as  described  above;  b.  Identification  of  the  person  or  persons  in  Conoco  who  participated  in  making   the  decisions  to  make  the  political  contribution  or  expenditure;  and  c.  The  internal  guidelines  or   policies,  if  any,  governing  Conoco's  political  contributions  and  expenditures.  The  report  shall  be   presented  to  the  board  of  directors'  audit  committee  or  other  relevant  oversight  committee  and   posted  on  the  company's  website  to  reduce  costs  to  shareholders. Climate  Change:   Greenhouse  gas   emissions ConocoPhillips  has  acknowledged  the  importance  of  addressing  global  climate  change  and  the  need   to  develop  GHG  targets  for  its  operations.  However,  no  targets  for  reductions  have  been  established,   and  no  progress  on  reducing  energy  use  per  unit  of  production  is  evident.  We  believe  setting  targets  is   an  important  step  in  the  development  of  a  comprehensive  long  term  strategy  to  significantly  reduce   Vote  against GHG  emissions  from  operations  and  products.   (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312508073155/ddef14a.htm#toc70657_ 30) Voted  on Voted  on,   Tally:  9.2% Voted  on,   Tally:  25.5% Voted  on,   Tally:  9.2% Voted  on Voted  on,   Tally:  26.7% Voted  on,   Tally:  9.4% Voted  on,   Tally:  11.9% Voted  on,   Tally:  29.4% Source:  Resolutions  compiled  from  Thomson  One  and  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  Vote  tallies  compiled  from  the  Interfaith  Center  on  Corporate  Responsibility  and   company  financial  filings. ConocoPhillips 2008 ConocoPhillips 2008 ConocoPhillips 2008 ConocoPhillips 2008 ConocoPhillips 2008 ConocoPhillips 2009 ConocoPhillips 2009 ConocoPhillips 2009 ConocoPhillips 2010 Shareholders  request  the  Board  of  Directors  to  report  to  shareholders,  at  reasonable  cost  and   omitting  proprietary  information,  on  how  the  corporation  ensures  that  it  is  accountable  for  its   environmental  impacts  in  all  of  the  communities  where  it  operates.  The  report  should  contain  the   following  information:  1)  how  the  corporation  makes  available  reports  regarding  its  emissions  and   Environment:   environmental  impacts  on  land,  water,  and  soil  —  both  within  its  permits  and  emergency  emissions  —   Environmental   Vote  against to  members  of  the  communities  where  it  operates;  2)  how  the  corporation  integrates  community   impact  to   environmental  accountability  into  its  current  code  of  conduct  and  ongoing  business  practices;  and  the   communities extent  to  which  the  corporation’s  activities  have  negative  health  effects  on  individuals  living  in   economically  poor  communities.   (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312508073155/ddef14a.htm#toc70657_3 0) Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  prepare  a  report,  at  reasonable  cost  and  omitting   proprietary  information,  on  the  potential  environmental  damage  that  would  result  from  drilling  for  oil   Environment:  Arctic   and  gas  in  the  area  inside  the  National  Petroleum  Reserve-­‐Alaska  originally  protected  by  the  1998   National  Wildlife   ROD.  The  report  should  consider  the  implications  of  a  policy  of  refraining  from  drilling  in  such  areas   Vote  against Refuge and  should  be  available  to  investors  by  the  2009  annual   meeting.(http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312508073155/ddef14a.htm#to c70657_30) Shareholders  request  that  an  independent  committee  of  the  Board  prepare  a  report  on  the   environmental  damage  that  would  result  from  the  company’s  expanding  oil  sands  operations  in  the   Environment:  Oil   Canadian  boreal  forest.  The  report  should  consider  the  implications  of  a  policy  of  discontinuing  these   Vote  against sands expansions  and  should  be  available  to  investors  by  May  2009.   (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312508073155/ddef14a.htm#toc70657_3 0) The  shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  prepare  by  October  2008,  at  reasonable  expense   and  omitting  proprietary  information,  a  Global  Warming  Report.  The  report  may  describe  and  discuss   Climate  Change:   how  action  taken  to  date  by  ConocoPhillips  to  reduce  its  impact  on  global  climate  change  has  affected   Impact  on  climate   global  climate  in  terms  of  any  changes  in  mean  global  temperature  and  any  undesirable  climatic  and   Vote  against change weather-­‐related  events  and  disasters  avoided.   (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312508073155/ddef14a.htm#toc70657_ 30) Sharholders  request  that  the  compny  provide  a  report,  updated  semi-­‐annually,  dislosing  Conoco's:  1.   Policies  and  procedures  for  political  contributions  and  expenditures  (both  direct  and  indirect)  made   with  corporate  funds.  2.  Monetary  and  non-­‐monetary  political  contributions  and  expenditures  not   deductible  under  162  (e)  (1)  (B)  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Code,  including,  but  not  limited  to   contributions  to  or  expenditures  on  behalf  of  political  candidates,  political  parties,  political   committees  and  other  political  entities  organized    and  operating  under  26  USC  Sec.  527  of  the  Internal   Climate  Change:   Revenue  Code  and  any  portion  of  any  dues  or  similar  payments  made  to  any  tax-­‐exempt  organization   lobbying/political   that  is  used  for  an  expenditure  or  contribution  if  made  directly  by  the  corporation  would  not  be   Vote  against contributions deductible  under  section  161  (e)  (1)(B)  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Coe.  The  report  shall  include  the   following:  a.  An  accounting  of  Conoco's  funds  that  are  used  for  political  contributions  or  expenditures   as  described  above;  b.  Identification  of  the  person  or  persons  in  Conoco  who  participated  in  making   the  decisions  to  make  the  political  contribution  or  expenditure;  and  c.  The  internal  guidelines  or   policies,  if  any,  governing  Conoco's  political  contributions  and  expenditures.  The  report  shall  be   presented  to  the  board  of  directors'  audit  committee  or  other  relevant  oversight  committee  and   posted  on  the  company's  website  to  reduce  costs  to  shareholders. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current   Climate  Change:   technologies,  for  reducing  total  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  Company’s  products  and   Greenhouse  gas   operations;  and  that  the  Company  report  to  shareholders  by  September  30,  2009,  on  its  plan  to   Vote  against emissions achieve  these  goals.   (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312509067954/ddef14a.htm#toc64204_3 Shareholders  request  that  an  independent  committee  of  the  Board  prepare  a  report  (at  reasonable   cost  and  omitting  proprietary  information)  on  the  environmental  damage  that  would  result  from  the   company’s  expanding  oil  sands  operations  in  the  Canadian  boreal  forest.  The  report  should  consider   Environment:  Oil   the  implications  of  a  policy  of  discontinuing  these  expansions  and  should  be  available  to  investors  by   Vote  against sands May  2010.   (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312509067954/ddef14a.htm#toc64204_ 30) Sharholders  request  that  the  compny  provide  a  report,  updated  semi-­‐annually,  dislosing  Conoco's:  1.   Policies  and  procedures  for  political  contributions  and  expenditures  (both  direct  and  indirect)  made   with  corporate  funds.  2.  Monetary  and  non-­‐monetary  political  contributions  and  expenditures  not   deductible  under  162  (e)  (1)  (B)  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Code,  including,  but  not  limited  to   contributions  to  or  expenditures  on  behalf  of  political  candidates,  political  parties,  political   committees  and  other  political  entities  organized    and  operating  under  26  USC  Sec.  527  of  the  Internal   Climate  Change:   Revenue  Code  and  any  portion  of  any  dues  or  similar  payments  made  to  any  tax-­‐exempt  organization   lobbying/political   that  is  used  for  an  expenditure  or  contribution  if  made  directly  by  the  corporation  would  not  be   Vote  against contributions deductible  under  section  161  (e)  (1)(B)  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Coe.  The  report  shall  include  the   following:  a.  An  accounting  of  Conoco's  funds  that  are  used  for  political  contributions  or  expenditures   as  described  above;  b.  Identification  of  the  person  or  persons  in  Conoco  who  participated  in  making   the  decisions  to  make  the  political  contribution  or  expenditure;  and  c.  The  internal  guidelines  or   policies,  if  any,  governing  Conoco's  political  contributions  and  expenditures.  The  report  shall  be   presented  to  the  board  of  directors'  audit  committee  or  other  relevant  oversight  committee  and   posted  on  the  company's  website  to  reduce  costs  to  shareholders. Climate  Change:   Greenhouse  gas   emissions Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current   technologies,  for  reducing  total  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  Company’s  products.   Vote  against (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312510071813/ddef14a.htm#toc87710_1 2) Voted  on,   Tally:  8.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  26.6% Voted  on,   Tally:  27.5% Voted  on,   Tally:  3.7% Voted  on,   Tally:  28.2% Voted  on,   Tally:27.4% Voted  on,   Tally:  30.3% Voted  on,   Tally:  27.4% Voted  on,   Tally:  25.5% Source:  Resolutions  compiled  from  Thomson  One  and  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  Vote  tallies  compiled  from  the  Interfaith  Center  on  Corporate  Responsibility  and   company  financial  filings. Shareholders  request  that  an  independent  committee  of  the  Board  prepare  a  report  (at  reasonable   cost  and  omitting  proprietary  information)  on  the  environmental  damage  that  would  result  from  the   company’s  expanding  oil  sands  operations  in  the  Canadian  boreal  forest.  The  report  should  consider   Environment:  Oil   Voted  on,   ConocoPhillips 2010 the  implications  of  a  policy  of  discontinuing  these  expansions  and  should  be  available  to  investors  by   Vote  against sands Tally:  27.1% November  2010.   (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312510071813/ddef14a.htm#toc87710_1 2) Shareholders  request  that  the  board  of  directors  of  ConocoPhillips  adopt  environmental  policies  to   address  the  environmental  hazards  of  its  oil  and  gas-­‐related  activities  in  coastal  Louisiana  by  devising   Environment:   and  implementing  business  practices  that  will  prevent  future  harms  to  coastal  Louisiana  and  by  aiding   Voted  on,   ConocoPhillips 2010 Vote  against Coastal  Louisiana in  the  restoration  of  wetlands  lost  through  past  actions  of  ConocoPhillips.   Tally:  6.7% (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312510071813/ddef14a.htm#toc87710_ 12) Investors  request  ConocoPhillips  Board  of  Directors  to  prepare  a  report  to  shareowners  on  the   financial  risks  resulting  from  climate  change  and  its  impacts  on  shareowner  value  over  time,  as  well  as   Climate  Change:   actions  the  Board  deems  necessary  to  provide  long-­‐term  protection  of  our  business  interests  and   Voted  on,   ConocoPhillips 2010 Vote  against Financial  risks shareowner  value.  The  Board  shall  decide  the  parameters  of  the  study  and  summary  report.   Tally:  7.5% (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312510071813/ddef14a.htm#toc87710_ 12) Shareholders  request  the  Board  adopt  stringent  goals  to  reduce  significantly  the  emissions  of  TRI   chemicals  from  our  company's  refineries,  and  to  report  annually  by  Sept.  15th,  1.  its  progress  in   Environment:  Toxic   Voted  on,   ConocoPhillips 2010 Vote  against implementing  these  goals,  as  well  as  2.  A  comprehensive  description  of  the  quantities  of  toxic   pollution Tally:  6.9% chemicals  reportable  under  the  TRI  that  were  emitted  at  those  facilities  during  the  prior  calendar   year. Sharholders  request  that  the  compny  provide  a  report,  updated  semi-­‐annually,  dislosing  Conoco's:  1.   Policies  and  procedures  for  political  contributions  and  expenditures  (both  direct  and  indirect)  made   with  corporate  funds.  2.  Monetary  and  non-­‐monetary  political  contributions  and  expenditures  not   deductible  under  162  (e)  (1)  (B)  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Code,  including,  but  not  limited  to   contributions  to  or  expenditures  on  behalf  of  political  candidates,  political  parties,  political   committees  and  other  political  entities  organized    and  operating  under  26  USC  Sec.  527  of  the  Internal   Climate  Change:   Revenue  Code  and  any  portion  of  any  dues  or  similar  payments  made  to  any  tax-­‐exempt  organization   Voted  on,   ConocoPhillips 2010 lobbying/political   that  is  used  for  an  expenditure  or  contribution  if  made  directly  by  the  corporation  would  not  be   Vote  against Tally:  26.9% contributions deductible  under  section  161  (e)  (1)(B)  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Coe.  The  report  shall  include  the   following:  a.  An  accounting  of  Conoco's  funds  that  are  used  for  political  contributions  or  expenditures   as  described  above;  b.  Identification  of  the  person  or  persons  in  Conoco  who  participated  in  making   the  decisions  to  make  the  political  contribution  or  expenditure;  and  c.  The  internal  guidelines  or   policies,  if  any,  governing  Conoco's  political  contributions  and  expenditures.  The  report  shall  be   presented  to  the  board  of  directors'  audit  committee  or  other  relevant  oversight  committee  and   posted  on  the  company's  website  to  reduce  costs  to  shareholders. Shareholders  request  that  the  Board  prepare  a  report  discussing  possible  long  term  risks  to  the   company’s  finances  and  operations  posed  by  the  environmental,  social  and  economic  challenges   Environment:  Oil   Voted  on,   ConocoPhillips 2011 associated  with  the  oil  sands.  The  report  should  be  prepared  at  reasonable  cost,  omit  proprietary  and   Vote  against sands Tally:  27.8% legal  strategy  information,  address  risks  other  than  those  associated  with  or  attributable  to  climate   change,  and  be  available  to  investors  by  August  2011.   Shareholders  request  that  the  board  of  directors  of  ConocoPhillips  adopt  environmental  policies  to   address  the  environmental  hazards  of  its  oil  and  gas-­‐related  activities  in  coastal  Louisiana  by  devising   Environment:   and  implementing  business  practices  that  will  prevent  future  harms  to  coastal  Louisiana  and  by  aiding   Voted  on,   ConocoPhillips 2011 Vote  against Coastal  Louisiana in  the  restoration  of  wetlands  lost  through  past  actions  of  ConocoPhillips.   Tally:  6.1% (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163165/000119312511083165/ddef14a.htm#toc137615 _28) Board  of  Directors  to  prepare  a  report  to  shareowners  on  the  financial  risks  resulting  from  climate   Climate  Change:   change  and  its  impacts  on  shareowner  value  over  time,  as  well  as  actions  the  Board  deems  necessary   Voted  on,   ConocoPhillips 2011 Vote  against Financial  risks to  provide  long-­‐term  protection  of  our  business  interests  and  shareowner  value.   Tally:  7.8% (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/conocophillips-­‐climate-­‐risk-­‐2011) Stockholders  request  that  the  Board  authorize  the  preparation  of  a  report  updated  annually,   disclosing:  1.  Company  policies  and  procedures  governing  the  lobbying  of  legislators  and  regulators,   including  that  done  on  our  company's  behalf  by  trade  associations.  The  disclosure  whould  include   both  direct  and  indirect  lobbying  and  grassroots  lobbying  communications.  2.  A  listing  of  payments   (both  direct  and  indirect,  including  payments  to  trade  associations)  used  for  direct  lobbying  as  well  as   grassroots  lobbying  communications,  including  the  amount  of  the  payment  and  the  recipient.  3.   Membership  in  and  payments  to  any  tax-­‐exempt  organization  that  writes  and  endorses  model   Climate  Change:   legislation.  4.  Description  of  the  decision-­‐making  process  and  oversight  by  the  management  and   Voted  on,   ConocoPhillips 2011 Vote  against Lobbying board  for  a.  Direct  and  indirect  lobbying  contribution  or  expenditure;  and  b.  Payment  for  grassroots   Tally:  26.4% lobbying  expenditure.  For  the  purposes  of  this  proposal,  a  "grassroots  lobbying  communication"  is  a   communication  directed  to  the  general  public  that  (a)  refers  to  specific  legislation,  (b)  reflects  a  view   on  the  legislation,  and  (c)  encourages  the  recipient  of  the  communication  to  take  action  with  respect   to  the  legislation.  Both  "direct  and  indirect  lobbying"  and  "grassroots  lobbying  communications"   include  efforts  at  the  local,  state  and  federal  levels.  The  report  shall  be  presented  to  the  Audit   Committee  of  the  Board  or  other  relevant  oversight  committee  of  the  Board  and  posted  on  the   company's  website. Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current  technologies,  for  reducing  total   Climate  Change:   greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  Company's  products  and  operations;  and  that  the  Company   Voted  on,   ConocoPhillips 2011 Greenhouse  gas   Vote  against report  to  shareholders  by  September  30,  2011,  on  its  plans  to  achive  these  goals.   Tally:  26.8% emissions (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/conocophillips-­‐ghg-­‐reduction-­‐goals-­‐2011) Shareholders  request  that  the  board  of  directors  adopt  environmental  policies  to  address  the   Environment:   environmental  hazards  of  its  oil  and  gas-­‐related  activities  in  coastal  Louisiana  by  devising  and   Voted  on,   ConocoPhillips 2012 Vote  against Coastal  Louisiana implementing  business  practices  that  will  prevent  future  harms  to  coastal  Louisiana  and  by  aiding  in   Tally:    6.3% the  restoration  of  wetlands  lost  through  past  actions  of  ConocoPhillips. Source:  Resolutions  compiled  from  Thomson  One  and  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  Vote  tallies  compiled  from  the  Interfaith  Center  on  Corporate  Responsibility  and   company  financial  filings. ConocoPhillips 2012 Climate  Change:   Lobbying ConocoPhillips 2012 Climate  Change:   Greenhouse  gas   emissions ConocoPhillips 2013 Climate  Change:   Lobbying ConocoPhillips 2013 Climate  Change:   Greenhouse  gas   emissions ConocoPhillips 2014 Climate  Change:   Lobbying ConocoPhillips 2014 Climate  Change:   Greenhouse  gas   emissions ConocoPhillips 2015 Climate  Change:   Lobbying ConocoPhillips 2015 Climate  Change:   Executive   compensation Stockholders  request  that  the  Board  authorize  the  preparation  of  a  report  updated  annually,   disclosing:  1.  Company  policies  and  procedures  governing  the  lobbying  of  legislators  and  regulators,   including  that  done  on  our  company's  behalf  by  trade  associations.  The  disclosure  whould  include   both  direct  and  indirect  lobbying  and  grassroots  lobbying  communications.  2.  A  listing  of  payments   (both  direct  and  indirect,  including  payments  to  trade  associations)  used  for  direct  lobbying  as  well  as   grassroots  lobbying  communications,  including  the  amount  of  the  payment  and  the  recipient.  3.   Membership  in  and  payments  to  any  tax-­‐exempt  organization  that  writes  and  endorses  model   legislation.  4.  Description  of  the  decision-­‐making  process  and  oversight  by  the  management  and   board  for  a.  Direct  and  indirect  lobbying  contribution  or  expenditure;  and  b.  Payment  for  grassroots   lobbying  expenditure.  For  the  purposes  of  this  proposal,  a  "grassroots  lobbying  communication"  is  a   communication  directed  to  the  general  public  that  (a)  refers  to  specific  legislation,  (b)  reflects  a  view   on  the  legislation,  and  (c)  encourages  the  recipient  of  the  communication  to  take  action  with  respect   to  the  legislation.  Both  "direct  and  indirect  lobbying"  and  "grassroots  lobbying  communications"   include  efforts  at  the  local,  state  and  federal  levels.  The  report  shall  be  presented  to  the  Audit   Committee  of  the  Board  or  other  relevant  oversight  committee  of  the  Board  and  posted  on  the   company's  website. Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current  technologies,  for  reducing  total   greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  Company’s  products  and  operations;  and  that  the  Company   report  to  shareholders  by  September  30,  2012,  on  its  plan  to  achieve  these  goals.   (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/conocophillips-­‐ghg-­‐reduction-­‐goals-­‐2012) Stockholders  request  that  the  Board  authorize  the  preparation  of  a  report  updated  annually,   disclosing:  1.  Company  policy  and  procedures  governing  lobbying,  both  direct  and  indirect,  and   grassroots  lobbying  communications.  2.  Payments  used  for  (a)  direct  or  indirect  lobbying,  or  (b)   grassroots  lobbying  communications,  in  each  case  including  the  amount  of  the  payment  and  the   recipient.  3.  ConocoPhillips'  membership  in  and  payments  to  any  tax-­‐exempt  organization  that  writes   and  endorses  model  legislation.  4.  Description  of  the  decision-­‐making  process  and  oversight  by   management  and  the  board  for  making  payments  described  in  section  2  above.  For  the  purposes  of   this  proposal,  a  "grassroots  lobbying  communication"  is  a  communication  directed  to  the  general   public  that  (a)  refers  to  specific  legislation  or  regulation,  (b)  reflects  a  view  on  the  legislation  or   regulation,  and  (c)  encourages  the  recipient  of  the  communication  to  take  action  with  respect  to  the   legislation  or  regulation.  "Indirect  lobbying"  is  lobbying  engaged  in  by  a  trade  association  or  other   organization  of  which  ConocoPhillips  is  a  member.  Both  "direct  and  indirect  lobbying"  include  efforts   at  the  local,  state  and  federal  levels.  The  report  shall  be  presented  to  the  Audit  Committee  of  the   Board  or  other  relevant  oversight  committees  of  the  Board  and  posted  on  the  company's  website. Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current  technologies,  for  reducing  total   greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  Company’s  operations;  and  that  the  Company  report  to   shareholders  by  September  30,  2013,  on  its  plan  to  achieve  these  goals.   (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/conocophillips-­‐ghg-­‐reduction-­‐goals-­‐2013) Stockholders  request  that  the  Board  authorize  the  preparation  of  a  report  updated  annually,   disclosing:  1.  Company  policy  and  procedures  governing  lobbying,  both  direct  and  indirect,  and   grassroots  lobbying  communications.  2.  Payments  used  for  (a)  direct  or  indirect  lobbying,  or  (b)   grassroots  lobbying  communications,  in  each  case  including  the  amount  of  the  payment  and  the   recipient.  3.  ConocoPhillips'  membership  in  and  payments  to  any  tax-­‐exempt  organization  that  writes   and  endorses  model  legislation.  4.  Description  of  the  decision-­‐making  process  and  oversight  by   management  and  the  board  for  making  payments  described  in  section  2  above.  For  the  purposes  of   this  proposal,  a  "grassroots  lobbying  communication"  is  a  communication  directed  to  the  general   public  that  (a)  refers  to  specific  legislation  or  regulation,  (b)  reflects  a  view  on  the  legislation  or   regulation,  and  (c)  encourages  the  recipient  of  the  communication  to  take  action  with  respect  to  the   legislation  or  regulation.  "Indirect  lobbying"  is  lobbying  engaged  in  by  a  trade  association  or  other   organization  of  which  ConocoPhillips  is  a  member.  Both  "direct  and  indirect  lobbying"  include  efforts   at  the  local,  state  and  federal  levels.  The  report  shall  be  presented  to  the  Audit  Committee  of  the   Board  or  other  relevant  oversight  committees  of  the  Board  and  posted  on  the  company's  website. Board  of  Directors  adopt  quantitative  goals,  based  on  current  technologies,  for  reducing  total   greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  the  Company’s  operations;  and  that  the  Company  report  to   shareholders  by  September  30,  2014,  on  its  plan  to  achieve  these  goals.   (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/conocophillips-­‐ghg-­‐emissions-­‐2014) Stockholders  request  that  the  Board  authorize  the  preparation  of  a  report  updated  annually,   disclosing:  1.  Company  policy  and  procedures  governing  lobbying,  both  direct  and  indirect,  and   grassroots  lobbying  communications.  2.  Payments  used  for  (a)  direct  or  indirect  lobbying,  or  (b)   grassroots  lobbying  communications,  in  each  case  including  the  amount  of  the  payment  and  the   recipient.  3.  ConocoPhillips'  membership  in  and  payments  to  any  tax-­‐exempt  organization  that  writes   and  endorses  model  legislation.  4.  Description  of  the  decision-­‐making  process  and  oversight  by   management  and  the  board  for  making  payments  described  in  section  2  above.  For  the  purposes  of   this  proposal,  a  "grassroots  lobbying  communication"  is  a  communication  directed  to  the  general   public  that  (a)  refers  to  specific  legislation  or  regulation,  (b)  reflects  a  view  on  the  legislation  or   regulation,  and  (c)  encourages  the  recipient  of  the  communication  to  take  action  with  respect  to  the   legislation  or  regulation.  "Indirect  lobbying"  is  lobbying  engaged  in  by  a  trade  association  or  other   organization  of  which  ConocoPhillips  is  a  member.  Both  "direct  and  indirect  lobbying"  include  efforts   at  the  local,  state  and  federal  levels.  The  report  shall  be  presented  to  the  Audit  Committee  of  the   Board  or  other  relevant  oversight  committees  of  the  Board  and  posted  on  the  company's  website. Adopt  a  policy  that  it  will  not  use  “reserve  additions,”  “reserve  replacement  ratio”  (“RRR”)  or  any   other  metric  based  on  reserves  to  determine  the  amount  of  any  senior  executive’s  incentive   compensation  without  adjusting  reserves  to  exclude  barrels  of  oil  equivalent  that  are  not   economically  producible  under  a  Demand  Reduction  Scenario  in  which  the  price  of  a  barrel  of  Brent   crude  oil  decreases  to  $65  (the  price  used  by  Standard  &  Poor’s)  by  2020  and  remains  flat  thereafter.   (http://www.ceres.org/investor-­‐network/resolutions/conocophillips-­‐delink-­‐executive-­‐compensation-­‐ from-­‐reserves-­‐2015) Vote  against Voted  on,   Tally:25.1% Vote  against Voted  on,   Tally:  27% Vote  against Voted  on,   Tally:  26.1% Vote  against Voted  on,   Tally:  29.4% Vote  against Voted  on,   Tally:  25.3% Vote  against Voted  on,   Tally:  25.8% Vote  against Voted  on,   Tally:  26.7% Vote  against Voted  on,   Tally:  5.8% Source:  Resolutions  compiled  from  Thomson  One  and  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  Vote  tallies  compiled  from  the  Interfaith  Center  on  Corporate  Responsibility  and   company  financial  filings.