TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 GENERAL INFORMATION SECTIO SECTIO SECTIO Moisan Dairy AWMP Signature Page ..1-1 Background and Site Information ..1-3 Manure Storage and Nutrient Balance Summary ..1-6 Emergency Response Plan .. 1-7 Farm Location Map ..1-8 Farm Topography Map .. 1-9 2 - PRODUCTION AREA Number of Animals .. 2-1 Animal Mortality Management .. 2-1 Collection of Manure, Process Water and Runoff .. 2-1 Treatment Facilities .. 2-2 Storage Facilities .. 2-2 Transfer of Manure, Process Water and Runoff .. 2-2 Operation and Maintenance Considerations .. 2-3 Production Area Map(s) .. 2?9 3 - UTILIZATION AREA Cropping System .. 3-1 Field Map(s) .. 3-2 Application .. 3-4 General Considerations for Making Manure Applications .. 3-4 Setback Requirements .. 3-5 Considerations for Dry Season Manure Applications .. 3-5 Setback Map(s) .. 3-6 Considerations for Wet Season Manure Applications .. 3-8 Manure and Soil Sampling Frequency .. 3-9 How to Sample Liquid Manure .. 3-9 How to Sample Solid Manure .. 3-9 Manure Tests .. 3-11 How to Sample Soils .. 3-13 Soil Tests .. 3-15 How to Calibrate Application Equipment .. 3-17 Amount of Manure to Apply for Crops Grown .. 3-21 Irrigation Water Management .. 3-31 4 - SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Soil Map(s) .. 4-1 Soil Reports .. 4-3 Predicted Soil Erosion .. 4-13 Phosphorus Index .. 4-20 Page i of ii TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 5 REFERENCES 0 Notice of Registration and Oregon CAFO General Permit Summary .. 5-1 0 Oregon Con?ned Animal Feeding Operation General Permit Number 1 .. 5-3 0 Publications and Software .. 5-27 0 ORAWM Workbook .. 5-29 Moisan Dairy AWMP Page ii of ii Section 1 GENERAL INFORMA TION Oregon Department of Agriculture CAFO Division Animal Waste Management Plan Signature Sheet ODA USE ONLY MAlt AWM Pit Approved Date Received Date Facility Name: Moisan Dairy Facility Address: 9165 Wheatland Road N. Keizer, OR 97303 Operated by: Don Moisan Mailing Address: 9165 Wheatland Road N. Keizer, OR 97303 Complete if different than the Operator Owned by: Don Moisan Mailing Address: 9165 Wheatland Road N. Keizer. OR 97303 El As the Operator of Moisan Dairy the existing Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) I agree to manage this facility in accordance with on file with ODA and maintain those practices as described in the plan. This signed AWMP is incorporated into the CAFO NPDES General Permit by reference (Permit Condition 53.A.2.). El If changes are made to the animal population, facilities and/or management of the CAFO, a new AWMP must be submitted to ODA for approval at least 45 days before the modification is implemented unless a different schedule is allowed by ODA in writing (Permit Condition S3.D.1 and 2). Operator? Operator?s Name (Please Print) Don Moisan Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 1?1 Section 1 GENERAL INFORMA TION Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 1-2 Section 1 GENERAL INFORMATION BACKGROUND AND SITE INFORMATION Animal Feeding Operation: Large Concentrated CAFO Type 8. Size: Dairy 2,300 animals Latitude/Longitude: W123.01455o Moisan Dairy is located approximately a 4.9 miles northwest of Keizer, Oregon in Marion County, Oregon. Moisan Dairy is owned and managed by Don Moisan who is planning to have dairy livestock at this facility consisting of 1,020 milk cows, 180 dry cows, 550 heifers?and 550 calves. The milk cows, dry cows and calves on Moisan Dairy are con?ned. Some of the heifers are out on pasture for varying times throughout the year as weather conditions permit. The heifers will spend more time in the livestock barns and less time on the hay and pasture ?elds in the winter months and more time on the hay and pasture ?elds in the spring, summer and fall months and less time in the livestock barns. Manure, bedding and wasted feed collected in the milk cow and heifer barns is cleaned using recycled wastewater from the waste storage ponds. Manure, bedding and wasted feed collected in the dry cow barns are cleaned by scraping the ?oors with farm equipment. Manure, bedding and wasted feed collected in the calf hutches is clean by hand. Leachate and rainfall runoff from the silage and solids storage facilities is directed to wastewater collection facilities. Rainfall runoff from paved and unpaved areas that comes into contact with animal manure is directed to the wastewater collection facilities. All rainfall runoff from roofs is collected or planned to be collected using gutters and downspouts and directed to drainageways using underground pipelines. All process water from the dairy operation is directed to catch basins that drain to wastewater collection facilities. Two reinforced concrete tanks serve as the collection facilities for wastewater and contaminated runoff. The primary collection tank was constructed when the dairy was ?rst established and is located at the rear of the milking facilities and freestall barns. A rectangular below ground reinforced concrete tank was constructed on the west side of the new freestall barn in 2005 to collect ?ush water from the new barn and rainfall runoff from the extended silage storage area shown on the Production Area Map for the dairy on page 2-9. Neither of the collection tanks were considered in the long term storage calculations due to their limited capacity and variability Of wastewater production from the dairy operation. Based on observation the tanks are serving as intended with no Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 1-3 Section 1 GENERAL INFORMA TION obvious leaks and should continue to do so as long as operation and maintenance guidelines are followed. Wastewater, manure, bedding and wasted feed from the milk cow and heifer barns is directed to the central reinforced concrete collection tank as shown on the Production Area Map for the dairy on page 2-9. Wastewater is pumped from the central collection tank to the solids/liquid separation facility to separate manure, bedding and wasted feed solids from the wastewater stream. Wastewater from the solids/liquid separation facility is directed to the waste storage pond #1 and separated solids are transferred to the solids storage area shown on the Production Area Map for the dairy on page 2-9. The solids/liquid separation facility consists of a stationary inclined screen that is estimated to have a separation ef?ciency of 22%. A roofed composting facility is planned to compost manure, bedding and wasted feed solids separated from wastewater generated from the dairy operation. The composting facility will be incorporated with the existing solids storage area. The solids/liquid separation facility will be move to the location shown on the facilities map to improve management of the facility and solids to be stored and composted in an ef?cient manner. Wastewater stored in waste storage pond #1 is transferred to waste storage pond #2 using an open earthen ditch which is eroding. A weir structure and pipeline is planned to transfer wastewater between waste storage pond #1 and #2 so the integrity of the earthen embankment that separates the two waste storage ponds can be maintained. Wastewater is transferred from waste storage pond #2 to waste storage pond #3 using a pump and underground PVC pipeline. During the growing season wastewater is transferred from waste storage pond #3 to the crop and hay land ?elds using a pump and underground PVC pipelines. A traveling big gun and linear irrigation system will be used to apply the wastewater to the crop and hay land ?elds where the nutrients and organics contained in the wastewater will be utilized. Manure, bedding and wasted feed collected in the dry cow and calf housing facilities is scraped to the solids storage area shown on the facilities map in Section 4. Currently solids are stored until they can be transferred and applied to the crop and hay land ?elds using a tractor pulled solids spreader to utilized the nutrients and organics contained in the solids. In the future it is planned to compost the solids before transferring them to the crop and hay land ?elds or off farm for utilization. The wastewater from the waste storage ponds and solids from the solids storage area will be applied to the hay and pasture land fields owned by Moisan Dairy by employees of the dairy or members of the Don Moisan family to be used as a nutrient source. Mortalities that occur during the year on the Moisan Dairy are moved to the composting facility and composted or buried on farm. The material from the composted mortalities are spread on the hay and pasture land fields owned and leased by Moisan Dairy by employees of the dairy or members of the Don Moisan family for utilization of the composted material as a nutrient source. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 1-4 Section 1 GENERAL INFORMA TION Moisan Dairy has 511.4 acres for the dairy farm facilities and the crop, hay and pasture land fields used to produce forage for the dairy livestock. These acres consist of 24.0 acres for the dairy farm facilities, shops and houses and 487.4 acres of irrigated crop, hay and pasture land used to produce forage for the dairy livestock. The pasture ?elds consist of perennial grass that is harvested by grazing livestock and for hay. Moisan Dairy also grows annual ?eld corn for silage and a grass cover crop. The estimated yields for the irrigated pasture harvested by grazing livestock and as hay is 6.5 tons per acre at 85% dry matter. The estimated yields for the irrigated field corn is 30 tons per acre at 30% dry matter and the estimated yield for the grass cover crop is 11.5 tons per acre at 30% dry matter. There is also a small amount of ?lbert orchard that is expected to produce 1.5 tons per acre of nuts. The soil concentration of phosphorus ranges from high to excessive in the Moisan Dairy crop, hay and pasture land ?elds. Applications of wastewater and solids containing manure are planned on a nitrogen basis on all fields and the soil phosphorus concentrations will be monitored using soil tests. Some solids containing manure may have to be exported off farm if the soil concentrations of phosphorus increase significantly in the future. It is estimated that the dairy produces enough manure to meet the nutrient demand for the crop, hay and pasture land ?elds. Supplemental nutrient applications to the crop, hay and pasture land ?elds should be based on soil tests and fertilizer guides to prevent excess soil nutrient concentrations. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 1-5 GENERAL INFORMATION MANURE STORAGE AND NUTRIENT BALANCE SUMMARY Manure Storage- Estimated Storage Storage Type: Capacity Period Small Wastewater Storage Ponds- 18.08 AF 102 Days LarggWastewater Storage Pond- 63.6 AF >365 Days Solids Storage Areas- 120,928 CF 184 Days utrient Balance- Generated (lbs) P205 Generated (lbs) Section 1 Nutrients Generated: after Losses after Losses Solid Manure- 18,301 15,843 Liquid Manure- 19,146 8,494 Pasture Manure- 4,162 2,398 Total- 41,610 26,736 Exported (lbs) P205 Exported (lbs) Exported Nutrients: after Losses after Losses Solid Manure- 0 0 Liquid Manure- 0 0 Total- 0 0 Crop Nutrient Removal: Utilized (lbs) P205 (lbs) Total- 167,812 58,270 Nutrlents Nutrients Removed by Generated after Crop and Expon Net Nutrlent Balance Net Nutrients: Losses(ms.) after Losses (lbs) after Losses (lbs) Nitrogren 41,610 167,812 426,202 Phosphate 26,736 58,270 -31,534 Nutrients Nutrients Nutrients Lost In System Losses: Generated (lbs) after Losses (lbs) System (lbs) Nitrogen 98,788 41,610 57,179 Phosphate 28,943 26,736 2,207 Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 1-6 Section 1 GENERA INFORMA TI ON EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN In Case of an Emergency Storage Facility Spill, Leak or Failure Implement the following ?rst containment steps: a. b. Stop all other activities to address the spill. Stop the flow. For example, use skid loader or tractor with blade to contain or divert spill or leak. 0. Call for help and excavator if needed. d. e. Complete the clean-up and repair the necessary components. Assess the extent of the emergency and request additional help if needed. In Case of an Emergency Spill, Leak or Failure during Transport or Land Application Implement the following ?rst containment steps: a. b. c. d. e. Stop all other activities to address the spill and stop the flow. Call for help if needed. If the spill posed a hazard to local traf?c, call for local traffic control assistance and clear the road and roadside of spilled material. Contain the spill or runoff from entering surface waters using straw bales, saw dust, soil or other appropriate materials. If flow is coming from a tile, plug the tile with a tile plug immediately. Assess the extent of the emergency and request additional help if needed. Contacts to be made by the owner or operator within 24 hours Organization Phone Number Oregon Dept. of Agriculture Natural Resources Division 635 Capitol St., NE. Salem, OR 97301-2532 (503) 986?4700 TTD (503) 986-4762 Oregon Emergency Response System (OERS) (800) 452-031 1 County Environmental Health Department (503) 588-5169 County Roads Department (503) 588-5036 Be prepared to provide the following information: ?eeces Moisan Dairy AWMP Your name and contact information. Farm location (driving directions) and other pertinent information. Description of emergency. Estimate of the amounts, area covered, and distance traveled. Whether manure has reached surface waters or major ?eld drains. Whether there is any obvious damage: employee injury, fish kill, or property damage. Current status of containment efforts. Page 1-7 Section 1 GENERAL INFORMA TION LQCATION MAP FOR MOISAN DAIRY . ilwau e? 9" ?1 a 2293.JIenningsILOd .. - ?ytl-L,? .1 . raga-.-- ddi" . I I cMin lle . Wh?eson .- . . I . 211 . - ?1 1.Molsan Dairy . Roe Malena Dairy . I I Noah Ficus North Fields lie.? 3.MuII?lsx ?frRiffuses - . 'Id?IrDatausa subjecttoiicanse. nu Scale 1 :400.000 9 DeLorme. Tape NorthAmeI-ica8.31 ml Data Zoom 9-0 Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 1-8 GENERAL INFORMA TION Section 1 TOPOGRAPHY MAP FOR MOISAN DAIRY Moisan Dairy 4: .5 7'3 - Nurth Fields . .- l' a! a H. fl. . Moisan TROU ST 1 .i North Fields . . -., . 3' '1 uBomJ I I 3-more Mous'an Dally . mach-Dal-us. In Scale1:24.000 ODoLmJopoNo?hAnu?cI" 10. mdelormm 1" I 2,000.0 ll Data Zoom 12-? Page 1-9 Moisan Dairy AWMP Section 1 GENERAL INFORMA TION Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 1-2 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA ANIMAL NUMBERS Moisan Dairy is currently permitted for 1,900 dairy animals consisting of 1,200 milking and dry cows, 200 heifers and 500 calves. Moisan Dairy is planning to have a maximum of 1,900 dairy animals consisting of 940 milk cows, 160 dry cows, 400 heifers, and 400 calves. This plan was written based on the maximum number of dairy animals planned and land base described herein. ANIMAL MORTALITY MANAGEMENT Currently animal mortalities for the Moisan Dairy are being disposed of by composting and/or burial. Other methods of dealing with mortalities may be employed by Moisan Dairy as needed. Having dead animals sent to an acceptable disposal site is the best method to deal with animal mortalities. A list of landfills and phone numbers can be found on the internet at If a local landfill is not permitted to accept animal carcasses, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) may grant an exception. Phone numbers to local DEQ offices can be found in most phone books or on the internet at Under no circumstances are animal mortalities to be disposed of in any type of liquid manure storage facility. COLLECTION OF MANURE, PROCESS WATER AND RUNOFF Manure, bedding and wasted feed is collected in the barns. The estimated volume of Manure bedding and wasted feed that will be collected annually was generated using the ORAWM workbook located in Section 5. Flushwater used to clean the alleyways in the barns is directed to catch basins that drain to the wastewater collection tanks via underground pipelines. Flushwater is recycled from the wastewater storage ponds during the wet weather storage period so there is no additional fresh water added. Leachate and rainfall runoff from the silage and solids storage areas is directed to catch basins that drain to wastewater collection tanks via underground pipelines. The estimated volumes of leachate and rainfall runoff from the silage and solid storage areas that will be collected annually were generated using the ORAWM workbook located in Section 5. Rainfall runoff from paved and unpaved areas that comes into contact with animal manure is directed to catch basins that drain to the wastewater collection tanks. The estimated volume of rainfall runoff that will be collected annually was generated using the ORAWM workbook located in in Section 5. All rainfall runoff from roofs is collected using gutters and downspouts and directed to drainage ditches using underground pipelines. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 2-1 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA All process water from the dairy operation is directed to catch basins that drain to wastewater collection tanks. The estimated volume of process water that will be collected annually was generated using the ORAWM workbook located in Section 5. TREATMENT FACILITIES An inclined gravity screen (side hill) liquid/solid separator will be used to separate solids from the wastewater produced from the dairy operation. The separated solids are composted and recycled for bedding or stored and applied to the hay land fields. STORAGE FACILITIES The underground reinforced concrete collection tanks shown on the Production Area Map on page 2-9 are used to collect wastewater containing manure. These facilities are considered collection and temporary storage facilities only and their capacity was not included in the long term storage calculations. Capacities and estimate volumes to store for the waste storage facilities can be found on the storage worksheet in the ORAWM workbook located in Section 5. TRANSFER OF MANURE, PROCESS WATER AND RUNOFF Wastewater, manure, bedding and wasted feed from the livestock barns is directed to the central collection tank where it is pumped to the separation facility to separate solids from the wastewater. Wastewater from the separation facility is directed to the wastewater storage ponds and separated solids are transferred to the solids storage area shown on the Production Area Map on page 2-9. . Wastewater stored in the main wastewater storage ponds is pumped to the hay land ?elds using underground pipelines to be utilized as a source of nutrients. Traveling big gun irrigation systems are used to apply the wastewater to the crop land ?elds. Solids stored in the solids storage area are hauled to the crop land ?elds and applied using a solids spreader to be utilized as a source of nutrients. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 2-2 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS WASTEWATER COLLECTION TANKS- The wastewater collection tanks shown on the Production Area Map on page 2-9 are used to store wastewater containing manure generated by the Moisan Dairy. The wastewater storage tanks are considered collection and temporary storage facilities so their capacities are not included in the long term storage calculations. Inspect all tanks weekly to insure structural integrity. If the structural integrity of a tank is compromised, immediately empty the tank to determine the cause and make necessary repairs before putting the tank back into service. Do not allow equipment that exceeds the design limit of the tanks on or within 20 feet of the structure. Keep pumps, agitators, piping, valves and all other electrical and mechanical equipment in good condition by following the manufacturer?s recommendations. Maintain grounding rods and wiring for all electrical equipment in good condition. Immediately remove all foreign debris within the structure that may cause damage to pumps or agitators. Pump the wastewater collection tanks completely empty during the summer months and cleanout any debris and other solid materials that may have accumulated in the tanks. Inspect the tanks for structural damage and if structural damage to a tank is discovered seek the services of a quali?ed engineer to assess the damage and recommend necessary repairs before putting the tank back into service. Follow the guidance given in Section 3, Utilization Area, when applying wastewater to ?elds. Do not dispose of animal carcasses in any wastewater collection tank. It is against the law to do so. Maintain all fences, railings, and/or warning signs to provide warning and/or prevent unauthorized human or livestock entry. Immediately repair vandalism, vehicular or livestock damage to the structure, earthen areas surrounding the structure, or any appurtenances. Maintain lids, grates and shields on openings. Provide proper ventilation before entering the tankI for any reason what so ever. Provide and use self - contained breathing apparatus (scuba) eguipment when entering a tank. No persons should enter the tank unless satay ropes are used and someone else capable of providing rescue assistance is outside the tank. Do not assume any tankI including open top tanksI are well ventilated. WASTEWATER STORAGE PONDS- The wastewater storage ponds shown on the Production Area Map on page 2-9 are used to store wastewater containing manure generated by the Moisan Dairy. The storage capacity and estimated storage period for the wastewater storage ponds are shown on the ORAWM workbook storage worksheet located in Section 5. Emptying of the wastewater storage ponds should begin in the spring and continue through the spring and summer months as weather conditions permit applying wastewater in accordance with the guidance given in Section 3, Utilization Area. To function properly and have the greatest management ?exibility, the wastewater storage ponds must be as empty as possible in the fall before the fall and winter rainy season Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 2-3 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA begins. Any annual sludge buildup in the wastewater storage ponds must be removed to maintain design capacity and applied to land application areas in accordance with guidance given in Section 3, Utilization Area. Inspect the wastewater storage ponds weekly to insure structural integrity and that at least 1 foot-6 inches of freeboard is being maintained to accommodate excess rainfall such as a 25 year-24hour storm and prevent overtopping embankment. If the structural integrity of a wastewater storage ponds embankment is found to be compromised, immediately draw the liquid level down below the damaged area to determine the cause. Seek the services of a quali?ed engineer to assess the damage and recommend necessary repairs before allowing wastewater levels above the damaged area. Pump the wastewater storage pond to the lowest level possible during the summer months and inspect the embankments for structural damage. If structural damage to the embankment of a wastewater storage pond is discovered, seek the services of a quali?ed engineer to assess the damage and recommend necessary repairs before allowing wastewater levels above the damaged area. Follow the guidance given in Section 3, Utilization Area, when applying wastewater to ?elds. Do not permit livestock access to the pond or on pond embankments. Control undesirable vegetation growth by spraying or mowing. Control rodents as necessary. Check elevations of earthfills periodically and restored to grade and shape as necessary. Fill and reseed eroded embankment areas or repair with well graded rock riprap. Safety features such as signs and fences should be kept in good repair. Do not dispose of animal carcasses in any settling basin or wastewater storage pond. It is against the law to do so. SOLIDS STORAGE FACILITY- The solids storage areas shown on the Production Area Map on page 2-9 is used to store solids containing manure generated by the Moisan Dairy. The storage capacity and estimated storage period for the solids storage areas are shown on the ORAWM workbook storage worksheet located in Section 5. Emptying of the solids storage areas should begin in the spring and continue through the spring and summer months as weather conditions permit applying solids in accordance with the guidance given in Section 3, Utilization Area. To function properly and have the greatest management flexibility, the solids storage areas must be as empty as possible in the fall before the fall and winter rainy season begins. Periodically inspect concrete and asphalt slabs, walls and curbs and repair or replace broken sections as needed. Cleanup any spillage of manure and organics from outside of the solids storage areas and place them back in the solids storage areas. Maintain all fences, railings, and/or warning signs to provide warning and/or prevent unauthorized human or livestock entry. Immediately repair vandalism, vehicular or livestock damage to the structure, earthen areas surrounding the structure, or any appurtenances. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 2-4 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA BUILDING ROOFS- Inspect building roofs annually as a minimum. Repair and/or replace all rusted sections and secure loose sections as needed. Immediately replace all broken trusses, rafters, beams, poles as needed. Immediately determining the cause and necessary modi?cation(s) to prevent reoccurring structural failure is essential. FENCES- Do not allow livestock access to open water courses and drainageways. Provide off stream watering facilities where possible and limit access to designated watering areas. Inspect fences periodically and repair or replace broken or decayed posts and tighten sagging wire as needed. Broken wire can be spliced or replaced. Replace broken or missing insulators on electric fences as needed and repair or replace inoperative electric fence controllers. Insure gates and other appurtenances are in good working order. Replace or repair components as needed. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS- Maintain sprinkler irrigation systems in accordance with the manufacturer?s recommendations to help ensure trouble free operation. Prevent livestock access to equipment during operation. Clean plugged nozzles and replace if worn or defective. repair all leaks by replacing valves, ?ttings, gaskets, worn or damaged parts. Prompt repair or replacement of damaged or worn components is necessary. Check to make sure all application components i.e. water control structures, gates, valves, ditches, etc. are functional and are in good operating condition. Maintain screening and ?ltering facilities. Maintain vigorous vegetative growth where applicable. LIVESTOCK WATERING FACILITIES- Check all above ground connections, valves, gates, rodent guards, inlets and outlets to make sure they are functioning properly. Check troughs and tanks for leaks or cracks and repair or replace immediately, if necessary. Make certain the area adjacent to the trough is well protected with gravel, paving, or good cover. Be sure that the outlet pipe has a free outlet and is not causing any serious erosion problems. Check periodically to see if debris has fallen into the trough or tank which may restrict in?ow or planned functions of the out?ow system. Clean the entire system periodically and remove moss, algae growth, and/or sludge. Chemicals such as copper sulfate and chlorine can be used to prevent moss and algae growth. Local rules and regulations are to be followed when using chemicals to make sure they are safe for animals. Where necessary maintain coverings and insulation to prevent damage by freezing. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 2-5 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA Eradicate or otherwise remove all rodents or burrowing animals. Immediately repair any damage caused by their activity. Immediately repair any vandalism, vehicular or livestock damage. PIPELINES- Flush pipelines used for liquid waste applications with clean water following waste application, or as needed, to prevent particle buildup. Drain the pipeline and components in areas that are Subject to freezing. If parts of the pipeline cannot be drained, a non-toxic antifreeze solution may be added. Check tomake sure all valves and air vents are set at the proper operating condition so they can provide protection to the pipeline. Inspect pipelines for signs of failure. Inspect risers and valves periodically for leaks or worn gaskets. Repair or replace pipeline, risers and valves as needed. Eradicate or otherwise remove all rodents or burrowing animals. Immediately repair any damage caused by their activity. PUMPS- Operate and maintain pumps in accordance with good judgment and manufacture?s manuals and recommendations. Drain liquid manure from pumps during cold weather to prevent freezing. If parts of the system cannot be drained, a non-toxic antifreeze solution may be added. A Inspect pumps periodically and remove debris wrapped around shafts and impellers. Maintain foot valves and check valves for proper operation. For proper operation of electric motors and controls, maintain lubrication for all bearings, keep electric panel free from obstructions and debris. Maintain electrical safety devices, assure all electrical contacts are tight, and lock main electrical switch to position during non-use season. Maintain adequate shade and ventilation for pump motors. For proper operation of pumps, maintain lubrication for all bearings and pump shafts, assure belts are adjusted properly, maintain safety covering devices on open shafts and belt drives, check to make sure all safety valves and devices are set at proper operating conditions so they may provide protection to the pump and power unit. For centrifugal pumps, periodically measure tolerance between pump impeller and pump casing wearing) and replace wear ring as needed to help restore new pump operating characteristics. Use portable pressure gauge (preferably a liquid filled gauge) to monitor pump performance. Operate and maintain agitators in accordance with the manufacture?s manual and recommendations. Inspect all plumbing annually as a minimum. Replace, tighten, or repair broken or loose connections and lines as needed. A Moisan Dairy Page 2-6 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA SEPARATION FACILITY- lnspect the solid/liquid separation facility daily to ensure the facility is operating properly and there has been no damage to structural components. Clean screens and outlets if they have become clogged or their capacity is not adequate for proper operation of the facility. Prevent any spillage or leakage onto roadways when transferring solids from the solid/liquid separation facility to the solids storage areas and to the crop, hay and pasture ?elds. VEGETATED TREATMENT AREAS Control undesired weed species, especially state-listed noxious weeds, and other pests that could inhibit proper functioning of the VTA. Inspect and repair treatment areas after storm events to fill in gullies, remove flow disrupting sediment accumulation, re-seed disturbed areas, and take other measures to prevent concentrated ?ow. Apply supplemental nutrients and soil amendments as needed to maintain the desired species composition and stand density of herbaceous vegetation. Maintain or restore the treatment area as necessary by periodically grading when deposition jeopardizes its function, and then reestablishing to herbaceous vegetation. Routinely de-thatch and/or aerate treatment areas used for treating runoff from livestock holding areas in order to promote infiltration. Conduct maintenance activities only when the surface layer of the VTA is dry enough to prohibit compaction. Protect the area immediately surrounding the well from being damaged by agriculture machinery, vehicles, or livestock. All fences, railings, and/or warning signs shall be maintained to provide warning and/or prevent unauthorized human or livestock entry. Do not allow any foreign debris to accumulate and maintain soil and vegetative covering in the immediate vicinity of the well. Eradicate or othenrvise remove all rodents or burrowing animals. Immediately repair any damage caused by their activity. Check metal surfaces for rust and other damage especially sections in contact with earth?ll and with other materials. Repair or replace damaged section and apply paint as a protective covering. Keep all surface water from entering or accumulating at the immediate vicinity of the well site. Immediately repair any vandalism, vehicular, or livestock damage. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 2-7 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA CHEMICAL HANDLING CHECKLIST- The following measures shall be taken to prevent chemicals from contaminating process water or storm water storage and treatment systems: 1. Moisan Dairy AWMP Make sure all chemicals are stored in proper containers. Expired chemicals and empty containers are to be properly disposed of in accordance with state and federal regulations. Pesticides and associate refuse are to be disposed of in accordance with the FIFRA label. Chemical storage areas are to be self-contained with no drains or other pathways that will allow spilled chemicals to exit the storage area. Chemical storage areas are to be covered to prevent chemical contact with rain or snow. Emergency procedures and equipment are to be in place to contain and clean up chemical spills. Chemical handling and equipment wash areas are to be designed and constructed to prevent contamination of surface waters, waste water, and storm water storage and treatment systems. Page 2-8 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA PRODUCTION AREA MAP FOR MOISAN DAIRY AccessRoad Moisan Dairy OwnerIOperator: Don Molsan County: Medan Stale: Oregon Approximate Acres: 24.0 Date: March 2015 Loceuon: 3.4.9.10. 14, a. 15 T68. Raw WM. Field 32.3 Acres mined By: Bruce D. Wilson. Han [Engineering 100 100 SCALE IN FEET Map Legend I: - Paved Areas .. .. - -Buried Manure Transfer Pipeline - Drainage - Underground Oullem Solidlelquld Separation - . ~Co|lection Tank I I Stallons To Big Wasiawat Storage Fan AF au?sseg-r I ll - Catch Basins . :15 - Rocl?Gutlars Moisan Dairy AWMP (a z-z 968:: Meg nesgow V3811 z'uonoas Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA CROPPING SYSTEM The acres of crop, hay and pasture land area available for utilization of the nutrients and organics contained in the wastewater and solids produced from the Moisan Dairy is shown on the utilization worksheet in ORAWM located in Section 5. Yield data and nutrient utilization rates for the crops grown are also shown on the inventory worksheet in ORAWM located in Section 5. Irrigated and nonirrigated crop yield data from the Marion County Soil Survey referenced in Section 5 indicates the yield data used in developing this plan is within the range of the given crop yields for well managed ?elds. Traveling big gun irrigation systems are used to irrigate and apply wastewater containing manure and?other organics produced from the Moisan Dairy to the crop, hay and pasture land ?elds. These systems use single large sprinkler nozzles usually mounted on a cart with wheels that is attached to a high density polyethylene pipeline that is rolled up on a large reel that provides a constant travel speed for the sprinkler. These systems apply water depending on the nozzle size, operating pressure and travel used and have an ef?ciency of 65 to 75 percent. Traveling big gun sprinkler systems must be well managed to prevent excess percolation, surface runoff, wind drift and evaporation losses. Other types of irrigation systems will be used to irrigate the crops that must be well managed to prevent excess percolation, surface runoff and erosion, wind drift and evaporation losses. The amount of irrigation water to apply based on the net irrigation requirements for the crop being grown can be fOUnd in the tables starting on page 3-33. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-1 Section 3 UTILIZA TION AREA FIELD MAPS Moisan Dairy Map Legend - Field Boundary. Field Nam. Acres - Irriga?on and Wastewatar Transfer Pipelines . -Wells Scale 0 500 IMO 1500 Feet -Pumping Plants Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-2 Section 3 TIL IZA TI ON AREA Moisan Dairy North Fields Map Legend . - new BoLndary. Field Name. Acres - lr?ga?on and Wastewaier Transfer Pipelines . -Walls - Pumping Plants Moisan Dairy AWMP Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA APPLICATION The manure and irrigation application systems will be calibrated in accordance with guidance starting on page 3-4 to insure the applications of manure, bedding and runoff from the waste storage facilities are in accordance with agronomic rates. No application of wastewater or solids containing manure is to be made to the ?eld setback areas shown on the Setback Map on page 3-6. Applications of wastewater and solids containing manure should be made in accordance with guidance starting on page 3-4 to reduce the risk of contaminated runoff to surface water sources and leaching of contaminants to ground water sources. The phosphorus runoff rating for each of the farm ?elds is based on the Western Oregon Phosphorus Index and is shown in the table on page 4-20. Wastewater, solids and commercial fertilizer for any ?eld with a high runoff rating must be applied on a phosphorus basis. Wastewater, solids and commercial fertilizer for any ?eld with a low or medium runoff rating can be applied on a nitrogen basis. No applications manure or commercial fertilizer containing phosphorus are to be made on a ?eld with a very high phosphorus runoff rating. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR MAKING MANURE APPLICATIONS Manure applications may be made at any time of the year provided certain factors have been considered. However, the overriding factor one should use in considering whether or not to apply nutrients to a crop, irrespective of the nutrient source, is the agronomic need of the crop at the time of application. The following guidelines are to be considered once the decision has been made to make a manure application. 0 Manure applications may be done as long as you can comply with all permit conditions and can meet the conditions outlined on page 3-5 to 3-8 in the AWMP. Based on crop nutrient uptake patterns, manure applications should stop when the crop iS done growing for the year and before the ?rst signi?cant rainfall event that is expected to result in saturated soils or surface runoff. 0 Fields that are subsurface (TILE) drained reguire additional precautions when manure is applied. Any pre-application tillage should leave as much residue as possible on the soil surface. Water control structures installed in subsurface drainage systems should be managed to prevent discharge of manure and wastewater during periods of application. 0 Be aware of the location of sensitive areasI concerns of neighbors or concerns of the public, which require special application procedures. To reduce odor problems, apply wastewater and solids containing manure in mid-morning when temperatures are warming and air is rising rather than in the afternoon or evening when air is cooling and settling. Avoid applications during periods of fog. Calibrate application eguipment to insure uniform distribution and accurate application rates in accordance with guidance given in the Considerations for Manure Applications starting on page 3-5. Refer to page 3-17 for guidance on the calibration of application equipment. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-4 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA - Maintain setbacks for manure application from any surface waters. The management goal is not to allow manure to enter surface waters at any time. The following table shows minimum setback requirements for manure applications: Season Manure type Application Equipment Wet Dry Liquid Big gun 100 feet 35 feet Solid Spreader 100 feet 35 feet Note: a. Setbacks are the distance between open waterways and manure application area. b. Setback requirements will generally increase for manures which are applied aerially (such as a traveling big gun) versus manures applied lower to the ground (such as a splash bar) due to potential for drift from wind or splashing. 0 Record applications, transfers or exports of nutrients (manure and fertilizer) and maintain them for at least 5 years. The CAFO Recordkeeping Calendar or the tools and forms referenced in Section 5 may be used to record this information. CONSIDERATIONS FOR DRY SEASON MANURE APPLICATIONS: Apply wastewater and solids containing manure at agronomic rates shown on the table on page 3-21 using the following guidelines: 0 Apply to land being prepared for crops. Till manure into soil within 3 days of application if possible or apply to actively growing crops such as grass, clover or alfalfa after cutting. 0 Do not apply during rainfall events that are expected to result in saturated soils or surface runoff. Maintain the setback distances described on page 3-5 and shown on the Setback Map on page 3-6 when making applications of liquids or solids containing manure. - Record applications, transfers or exports of nutrients (manure and fertilizer) and maintain them for at least 5 years. The CAFO Recordkeeping Calendar or the tools and forms referenced in Section 5 may be used to record this information. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-5 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA SETBACK MAPS FOR MOISAN DAIRY Moisan Dairy Map Legend 'Setb?ckm Scale 0 500 11110 Moisan Dairy AWMP Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Moisan Dairy North Fields Map Legend . . - Field Bomdsy. Field Name. Spmadabla Acres ?ew -5?tb?d?m Moisan Dairy AWMP Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA CONSIDERATIONS FOR WET SEASON MANURE APPLICATIONS: Only apply manure during this time period if the following guidelines CAN be met. Call the ODA CAFO Program at (503) 986?4700 for guidance if a manure application is needed and the following guidelines CAN NOT be met: Apply manure only to actively growing crops such as grass, clover or alfalfa. Minimize application rates by using the maximum travel rates for the application equipment. Maintain the setback distances described in the table on page 3-5 and shown on the Setback Map on page 3-6 when making applications of liquids or solids containing manure. Do not apply during rainfall events that are expected to result in saturated soils or surface runoff. Do not apply to saturated or flooded soils. It is recommended that application(s) be limited to soils (areas) where the flooding frequency class rating is None, Very Rare or Rare. Do not apply to Slopes greater than See the Soil Map in Section 4 for the location Of soil map units with slopes greater than Applications of wastewater or solids containing manure to frozen soils should be avoided. DO the following if an application Of wastewater or solids containing manure is to be made to frozen soils: - Apply only enough wastewater or solids containing manure to address storage limitations until suitable soil conditions for application are available. - Minimize applications to 5 wet tons per acre or less Of solids containing manure and 6,788 gallons (0.25 inches) per acre or less of wastewater. - Apply to alternating strips to reduce the risk Of contaminated runoff reaching surface water sources. - Apply to fields of established hay, pasture or fields containing at least 90% cover and are the furthest from Open water sources. - Do not apply wastewater or solids containing manure within 200 feet of surface water sources, drainageways, wells, or inlets to subsurface drainage systems. - Runoff control systems such as earthen dikes must be in place where applications will be made to fields with slopes greater than Record applications, transfers or exports of nutrients (manure and fertilizer) and maintain them for at least 5 years. The CAFO Recordkeeping Calendar or the tools and forms referenced in Section 5 may be used to record this information. Do not apply manure or commercial fertilizer to fields receiving applications unless the nutrients applied in the manure are less than the annual application of nutrients planned in the nutrient budget for the fields. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-8 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA MANURE AND SOIL SAMPLING FREQUENCY Sample liquids and solids containing manure during applications in early spring annually and have each sample analyzed for Total Nitrogen (TKN), Ammonium Nitrogen (NH4-N), Phosphorus (P) and Potassium (K) plus percent moisture. Ask the lab to report results in pounds per ton for the solids containing manure and in pounds per thousand gallons for liquids containing manure. Analyses of solids and liquids containing manure should be performed by a laboratory that meets the requirements and performance standards of the Manure Testing Laboratory Certification Program Collect soil samples from all fields receiving solids or liquids containing manure within a 5 year period in the fall (September 15?October 15) in accordance with Paci?c Northwest (PNW) Extension publication 570-E, ?Monitoring Soil Nutrients Using a Management Unit Approach? referenced in Section 5. Have the soil samples analyzed for Total Nitrogen (TKN) and Phosphorus (P) and ask the lab to report results in parts per million (ppm). Soil test analyses should be performed by laboratories that meet the requirements and performance standards of the North American Proficiency Testing Program (NAPT) Pro?ciency Assessment Program HOW TO SAMPLE LIQUID MANURE Obtain a composite following one of the procedures listed below and thoroughly mix. Using a plunger, an up?and-down action works well for mixing liquid manure in a five-gallon bucket. Fill a one-quart plastic bottle not more than three-quarters full with the composite sample. Store sample in freezer if not delivered to the lab immediately. Procedure 1. Sampling from storage- Agitate storage facility thoroughly before sampling. Collect at least five samples from the storage facility or during loading using a five-gallon bucket. Place a sub sample of the composite sample in a one?quart plastic container. Sampling a liquid manure storage facility without proper agitation (2-4 hrs. minimum) is not recommended due to nutrient stratification, which occurs in liquid systems. If manure is sampled from a lagoon that was not properly agitated, typically the nitrogen and potassium will be more concentrated in the top liquid, while the phosphorus will be more concentrated in the bottom solids. Procedure 2. Sampling during application- Place buckets around ?eld to catch manure from spreader or irrigation equipment. Combine and mix samples into one composite sub sample in a one-quart plastic container. HOW TO SAMPLE SOLID MANURE Collect a composite sample by following one of the procedures listed below. A method for mixing a composite sample is to pile the manure and then shovel from the outside to the inside of the pile until well mixed. Fill a one-gallon plastic heavy-duty zip lock bag approximately one-half full with the composite sample, squeeze out excess air, close and seal. Store sample in freezer if not delivered to the laboratory immediately. Procedure 1. Sampling while loading - Recommended method for sampling from a stack or bedded pack. Take at least ten samples while loading several spreader loads and combine to form one composite sample. Thoroughly mix the composite sample and take Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-9 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA an approximately one pound sub sample using a one-gallon plastic bag. Sampling directly from a stack or bedded pack is not recommended. Procedure 2. Sampling during spreading - Spread a tarp in ?eld and catch the manure from one pass. Sample from several locations and create a composite sample. Thoroughly mix the composite sample together and take a one-pound sub sample using a one-gallon plastic bag. Procedure 3. Sampling daily haul - Place a ?ve-gallon bucket under the barn cleaner 4-5 times while loading a spreader. Thoroughly mix the composite sample together and take a one-pound sub sample using a one-gallon plastic bag. Repeat sampling 2-3 times over a period of time and test separately to determine variability. Procedure 4. Sampling poultry in-house - Collect 8-10 samples from throughout the house to the depth the litter will be removed. Samples near feeders and waterers may not be indicative of the entire house and sub samples taken near here should be proportionate to their space occupied in the whole house. Mix the samples well in a ?ve-gallon pail and take a one-pound sub sample, place it in a one-gallon zip lock bag. Procedure 5. Sampling stockpiled litter - Take ten sub samples from different locations around the pile at least 18 inches below the surface. Mix in a five-gallon pail and place a one-pound composite sample in a gallon zip lock bag. Sample Identi?cation and Delivery Identify the sample container with information regarding the farm, animal species and date. This information should also be included on the sample information sheet along with application method, which is important in determining ?rst year availability of nitrogen. Keep all manure samples frozen until shipped or delivered to a laboratory. Ship early in the week (Mon-Wed.) and avoid holidays and weekends. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-10 UTILIZA TION AREA MANU RE TESTS LIQUID MANURE ANALYSIS Testing performed by Precision Agri Labs, Madera, CA Moisan Dairy Section 3 Lbs/1 ,000 gallons Report Date Sample ID. Total P205 K20 NH4-N Moisture Solids 2013 3061 03/06/2013 Small Ponds Wastewater 5.74 2.47 4.86 NA NA NA 3061 03/06/2013 Big Pond Wastewater 2.87 0.61 2.39 NA NA NA 3060 1223/2013 Small Ponds Wastewater 5.71 1.32 7.62 NA NA NA 3060 12/23/2013 Big Pond Wastewater 1.95 0.58 3.94 NA NA NA Moisan Dairy SOLID MANURE ANALYSIS Testing performed by Precision Agri Labs, Madera, CA Lbs/T on ?In Report Date Sample ID. Total I P205 K20 NH4-N Moisture Solids 2013 4151 03/08/2013 Solids Stack 2.59 1.41 1.41 NA NA NA 4151 12/23/2013 Solids Stack 4.6 2.23 3.61 NA NA NA Manure analyses should be performed by a laboratory that meets the requirements and performance standards of the Manure Testing Laboratory Certi?cation Program Manure Should be analyzed annually for a minimum of three (3) consecutive years to develop a cumulative manure analysis history as a basis for nutrient allocation to the ?elds. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3?11 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Moisiui?Dairy AWMP Page 3-12 #5 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA How TO SAMPLE SOILS Current soil tests must be used in the development and editing of nutrient management plans. A current soil test is one that is no older than 5 years that is used to represent the nutrient status of the entire ?eld. Soil analysis must be performed by laboratories successfully meeting the requirements and performance standards of the North American Pro?ciency Testing Program-Performance Assessment Program (NAPT-PAP). Results of these analysis will be used to determine application rates for manure, litter, and process wastewater. Guidance for soil sampling can be found in the Paci?c Northwest (PNW) Extension publication 570-E, ?Monitoring Soil Nutrients Using a Management Unit Approach?. Oregon State university Extension publication E01478, ?Soil Test interpretation Guide" provides guidance on how to determine soil nutrient concentrations and how to adjust soil pH to improve nutrient availability. Field Area. A composite soil sample should represent a uniform ?eld area. Each area shouldhave similar crop and fertility history. Soil characteristics (color, slope, texture, drainage) should be similar. Exclude small areas within a ?eld that are obviously different. The ?eld area represented by a single composite sample should represent no more than 40 irrigated acres or 100 dry land acres. Sampling Depth. Laboratory tests are calibrated to specific depths. It is vital to collect samples from appropriate depths. Sampling depth for most soils is the rooting depth in 6- inch intervals. In Oregon, as a minimum, soil samples should be collected from the 0-12? depth and from the 12-24? depth. The 0-6? surface soil samples are normally used for conventional tests of organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, pH and salt levels. Additionally, subsurface samples from the 6-24? depth are needed to estimate nitrogen availability for crops. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-13 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-14 Soil test analyses should be performed by laboratories that meet the requirements and performance standards of the North American Pro?ciency Testing Program (NAPT) Pro?ciency Assessment Program Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-15 Section 3 AREA SOIL TESTS Moisan Dairy SOIL TEST RESULTS Testing performed by AgSource Labs, Umatil/a, Oreqon Precision Agn? Labs, Madera, CA NO3- NH4- Report Test Date Field Depth Ca Mg TB pH SMP OM 2013-2015 meq meq meq 2851 12/30/2013 A 12" NA NA 30 1226 NA NA NA 6.2 6.6 NA AL75022 08/24/2014 12AL75021 08/24/2014 12AL75020 08/24/2014 122851 03/08/2013 122851 02l26l2013 122851 02l26l2013 122851 02l26/2013 122851 02/26/2013 122851 02/26/2013 122851 03/08/2013 122851 0310812013 122851 03/08/2013 12Section 3 TILIZA TI ON AREA Moisan)Dairy AWMP Page 9-16 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA How TO CALIBRATE APPLICATION EQUIPMENT Calibration of application equipment is a critical part of nutrient management. Calibration should be completed at least annually to insure manure and fertilizer will be uniformly applied. There are two basic approaches for calibrating a manure spreader - the load area and the weight area methods. The load area method is more accurate and can be used for both liquid and solid manure. The weight area method works only with solid or semi-solid manure. Irrigation System Calibration Place 35 buckets throughout the irrigation spray pattern and collect samples while operating the pump at a given and pressure (for a traveling gun record the travel speed also). At the end of the planned sample period measure the amount of liquid collected in inches (average the samples). The following chart shows how many gallons per acre applied per inch of liquid applied: Inches Liquid Manure Applied Gallons via mation: per Acre: 0.20 5,431 0.30 8,146 0.40 10,862 0.50 13,577 0.75 20,366 1.00 27,154 1.25 33,943 1.50 40,731 Soft Hose Injection System with Irrigation Hose: Alternative 1. Use a ?ow meter mounted on the injector system and calculate the distance and width to determine amount applied over a measured area. Example the ?ow meter measures 1,000 gallons over a distance of 600 feet and 10 feet wide. Formula: Application Rate (7,260 gallons/acre) (Gallons Applied (1 ,000 gal) 43,560 sq. ft/acre) divided by (Distance traveled (600 ft) Application width (10 ft)) Alternative 2. (Requires a 10-20 gallon graduated measuring container) Step 1) In the ?eld, measure the ?ow out of one injector for 5 seconds into the graduated measuring container and record gallons, repeat three (3) times and average the results. Step 2) Multiply the average amount collected from one injector by the number of injectors (equals amount applied for the whole system for 5 seconds). Step 3) Multiply the results of Step 2 times 12 to get gallons per minute. Step 4) Place the injector in the soil at the planned depth and operating speed and record the distance traveled in 1 minute (average 3 different measurements). Step 5) Determine the effective application width (number of injectors injector spacing in feet). Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-17 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA Step 6) Multiply the effective width times the distance traveled in 1 minute (this gives the square feet covered in 1 minute). Step 7) Divide the result of Step 6 by 43,560 (this gives the acres covered in 1 minute). Step 8) Divide the results of Step 3 (gallons per minute) by the results of Step 7 (acres covered in 1 minute) - (this gives the gallons applied per acre. For example: Step 1) Collect an average of 6 gallons from one injector for 5 seconds. Step 2) Applicator has 8 injectors (8 injectors 6 gallons per injector 48 gallons for 5 seconds) Step 3) 48 gallons in 5 seconds 12 576 gallons/minute applied Step 4) Average distance covered in 1 minute was 250 feet Step 5) Average width of the applicator is 12 feet. Step 6) 12 feet wide 250 feet long 3000 square feet Step 7) 3000 square feet divided by 43,560 square feet/acre .0688 acres covered in 1 minute Step 8) 576 gallons/minute divided by .0688 acres/minute 8,372 gallons/acre. Manure Spreader/1' anker Calibration There are several methods that can be used to calibrate the application rate of a manure spreader. The two best methods are the load-area method and the weight-area method. it is desirable to repeat the calibration procedure 2 to 3 times and average the results to establish a more accurate calibration. Before calibrating a manure spreader, the spreader settings such as splash plates should be adjusted so that the spread is uniform. Most Spreaders tend to deposit more manure near the middle than at the edge of the spread pattern. Overlapping can make the overall application more uniform. Calibrating application rates when overlapping is involved requires measuring the width of two spreads and dividing by two to get the effective spread width. Calibration should take place annually or whenever manure is being applied from a different source or consistency. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-18 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Load-Area Method: The load-area method is the most accurate and can be used for both liquid and soild manure. The load area method is a 3-step process: Step 1) Determine the amount of manure in the spreader. The most accurate way to determine the amount of manure in a spreader is weighting the spreader when it is empty and again when it is full. For a reliable estimate of spreader capacity, weigh several representative loads (at least ?ve) to determine the average gross weight. Subtract the empty spreader weight. Then, calculate the average net loaded weight. Step 2) Determine the area of spread using the method at the right. Width measurements near the beginning and end of the spread pattern should be avoided because the spreader may not be operating at full capacity. Step 3) Calculate the application rate. The application rate is calculated using the formula for either liquid or solid manure. Formula for Solid Manure Equals Tons/Acre (Average Loaded Weight (lbs) 21.81) divided by (Distance Traveled (ft) Width of Spread Formula for Liquid Manure Equals Gal/Acre (Tank Volume (gal) 43,560) divided by (Distance Traveled (ft) Width of Spread (f0) Weight-Area Method: The weight-area method can only be used with solid or semi-solidmanure. When a scale is not available, the application rate of a box spreader can be determined by collecting manure on a tarp or piece of heavy material. The weight area method is less accurate than the load area method. This method consists of eight steps: Step 1) Prepare/cut three 56?inch square tarps or pieces of heavy material (this size equals 1/2,000 of an acre). The pounds of manure collected on 56 inches square equals tons applied per acre. Step 2) Weigh one of the clean tarps and a large bucket on a platform scale. Record the weight. Step 3) Anchor the three tarps in the ?eld ahead of the spreader near the beginning, middle, and end of the area that will be spread with one load. Step 4) Drive over the three tarps at a normal speed to collect a representative manure sample. Step 5) Fold and place the ?rst tarp into the empty bucket without spilling the manure. Weigh the bucket, tarp, and manure. Subtract the weight of the clean tarp and bucket recorded in step 2. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-19 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Step 6) Repeat the process for each of the two remaining tarps. Calculate the average weight (pounds) of the manure collected. This value equals tons of manure applied per acre. Factor for converting pounds to tons and square feet to acres (21.8 43,560 sq ft per acre divided by 2,000 lbs/ton). The factor for converting square feet to acres 43,560 sq ft per acre. Step 7) Determining Area of Spread. The ?area of spread? is the length and width of the ground covered with one load of manure. The area of spread is affected by speed and equipment settings. Spreaders . discharge manure at varying rates depending on travel and PTO speed, gear box settings, and discharge openings. It is important to adjust the spreader so the pattern is as uniform as possible. Accurately measuring the length and width of this area is essential. To determine width, measure two adjacent spreads and divide by two to ?nd the ?effective? spread width. This accounts for overlap, which is often needed for a more uniform application. The length of spread is determined using the following three values: 1. Desired manure application rate based on soil and manure tests, 2. Width of the manure spread, and 3. Manure spreader holding capacity (weight and/or volume). From these values, calculate the distance or of spread using these formulas: Formula: Solid Manure Equals Feet/Load (Average Load Weight (lbs) 21.81) divided by (Spread Width (ft) App. Rate (tons/ac? Formula: Liquid Manure Equals FeetlLoad (Tank Volume (gal) 43,560) divided by (Spread Width (ft) Desired App. Rate (gal/ac)) . Step 8) Spread a load. If the distance traveled does not equal the calculated distance, adjust the speed or equipment settings. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-20 -) TILIZA TI ON AREA AMOUNT OF MANURE TO APPLY FOR CROPS GROWN The timing and frequency of applications of wastewater and solids containing manure for utilization by crops shown in the table below are based on information provided in Oregon State University Extension publications listed in Section 5. Section 3 The formulas for determining the total nutrient application rate per unit yield for each crop shown in the table below are as follows: Total to apply in pounds in pounds per yield unit from the table for the crop grown percent dry matter (DM) of harvested cropl100 planned or measured yield per yield unit Total P205 to apply in pounds in pounds per yield unit from the table for the crop grown 2.291 P205IP percent dry matter (DM) of harvested crop/100 planned or measured yield per yield unit Total K20 to apply in pounds in pounds per yield unit from the table for the crop grown 1.205 K20IK percent dry matter (DM) of harvested crop/100 planned or measured yield per yield unit The following table shows the crops that may be grown on this farm: Nutrient Removal (lb/yield unit) I FRUIT OR VEGETABLES I Yield Unit I lbIUnit I DM I Beans, dry edible 100 100 3.13 0.45 0.85 Blueberries ton 2000 100 2.14 0.20 3.54 Caneberries ton 2000 100 1 1 .43 7.42 1 1.43 Corn, Sweet ton 2000 100 17.80 4.8 1 1.6 Mixed Vegetables Fruit ton 2000 100 8.33 2.08 10.20 Onions 100 100 0.30 0.06 0.22 Orchard, Fruit ton 2000 100 13.00 2.00 16.00 Pea, edible ton 2000 100 73.60 8.00 18.00 Potatoes ton 2000 100 6.60 1.20 10.33 Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-21 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Nutrient Removal (lb/yield unit) GRAIN, SEED OR OIL CROPS I Yield Unit I lbIUnit I DM Barley bushels 48 100 0.87 0.16 0.21 Beets, sugar ton 2000 100 4.00 0.60 2.78 Canola ton 2000 100 70.00 12.00 18.00 Corn, grain shelled bushels 56 100 0.90 0.16 0.22 Crimson Clover seed lb 1 100 0.05 0.01 0.02 Fescue Seed, Straw Removed 100 100 10.03 1 .08 8.33 Fescue, seed (Fine or Tall) lb 1 100 0.02 0.00 0.00 Grass Seed 100 100 1.60 0.20 0.40 Grass Seed, Straw Removed ton 2000 100 33.90 5.50 34.40 Oats, grain bushels 32 100 0.62 0.11 0.16 Orchardgrass seed lb 1 100 0.016 0.002 0.004 Peppermint for Oil ton 2000 100 4.20 1.80 2.80 Peppermint for Oil, Leaves and Stems Removed ton 2000 100 87.2 36.8 57.8 Pumpkins ton 2000 100 4.00 1.40 6.60 Red Clover seed lb 1 100 0.05 0.01 0.02 Ryegrass Seed 100 100 1.60 0.20 0.40 Ryegrass, Perennial Seed lb 1 100 0.02 0.002 0.004 Wheat, Soft White for grain bushels 60 100 1.00 0.24 0.21 Wheat, Soft White Straw Removed ton 2000 100 43.40 8.90 a 20.90 Wheat, Hard Red for grain bushels 60 100 1.60 0.37 0.31 Wheat, Soft White Straw Removed ton 2000 100 83.40 17.10 37.10 Moisan Dairy AWMP Pa? 3-22 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Nutrient Removal (lb/yield unit) I HAY AND PASTURE CROPS I Yield Unit I IblUnit I DM I I Alfalfa, Hay ton 2000 100 64.00 8.00 42.00 Alta Fescue Hay/Pasture ton 2000 100 33.00 6.90 37.60 Grass Legume Hay/Pasture ton 2000 100 33.90 5.50 34.40 Meadow Fescue Hay/Pasture ton 2000 100 41.60 8.80 47.40 Oats Hay/Pasture ton 2000 100 60.00 10.20 14.80 Orchardgrass Hay/Pasture ton 2000 100 53.20 8.60 18.60 Perennial Hay/Pasture (Low Intensity) ton 2000 100 32.00 6.00 38.00 Perennial Hay/Pasture (Low-Med Intensity) ton 2000 100 38.00 6.00 38.00 Perennial Hay/Pasture (Medium Intensity) ton 2000 100 48.00 7.00 38.00 Perennial Hay/Pasture (Med- High Intensity) ton 2000 100 58.00 8.00 40.00 Perennial Hay/Pastu re (High Intensity) ton 2000 100 64.00 8.00 40.00 Ryegrass Hay ton 2000 100 33.40 5.40 28.40 Ryeg rass, Perennial Pasture ton 2000 100 58.00 8.00 48.00 Tall Fescue Hay/Pasture ton 2000 100 39.40 4.00 40.00 Nutrient Removal (lb/yield unit) SILAGE AND HAYLAGE CROPS Yield Unit IblUnit DM Corn for Silage ton 2000 100 7.50 1.20 6.00 Crimson Clover forage ton 2000 100 40.00 4.41 32.98 Field Pea, Forage ton 2000 100 73.60 8.00 18.00 Oat haylage ton 2000 100 60.00 10.20 14.80 Oats Peas/ Green Beans ton 2000 100 32.03 5.58 18.65 Red Clover forage ton 2000 100 40.00 4.41 32.98 Ryegrass Haylage ton 2000 100 50.00 8.00 42.67 Sorghum-Sudan Haylage ton 2000 100 54.33 6.33 58.00 Triticale Haylage ton 2000 100 49.00 6.80 11.40 Wheatgrass Hay/Pasture ton 2000 100 28.40 5.40 53.60 Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-23 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Nutrient Removal (Iblyield unit) I OTHER CROPS I Yield Unit I lbIUnit I DM I I Hops, Cones bale 200 100 9.00 0.96 5.00 Natural Area (Trees and Grass) ton 2000 100 10.52 1 .56 9.20 Nursery Stock ton 2000 100 8.33 2.08 10.20 MoisajDairy AWMP .) Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA SOLID MANURE APPLICATION CHART SOLID MANURE APPLICATION CHART MANURE ANALYSIS MANURE ANALYSIS (As received lb/ton) (As received Ib/ton) Total P205 K20 Total P205 K20 Test Date: 03/08/13 2.59 1.41 1.41 Test Date: 12/23/13 4.60 2.23 3.61 Source: Solids Stack Source: Solids Stack Manure Nutrient Content Manure Nutrient Content Manure Thickness Manure Thickness Applied to apply Total P205 K20 Applied to apply Total P205 K20 (Tons/Ac) (inches/Ac) (lb/A) (lb/A) (lb/A) (Tons/Ac) (inches/Ac) (lb/A) (lb/A) (lb/A) 1.00 0.013 3 1 1 1.00 0.013 5 2 4 1.50 0.020 4 2 2 1.50 0.020 7 3 5 2.00 0.026 5 3 3 2.00 0.026 9 4 7 2.50 0.033 6 4 4 2.50 0.033 12 6 9 3.00 0.039 8 4 4 3.00 0.039 14 7 11 3.50 0.046 9 5 5 3.50 0.046 16 8 13 4.00 0.052 10 6 6 4.00 0.052 18 9 14 4.50 0.059 12 6 6 4.50 0.059 21 10 16 5.00 0.066 13 7 7 5.00 0.066 23 11 18 5.50 0.072 14 8 8 5.50 0.072 25 12 20 6.00 0.079 16 8 8 6.00 0.079 28 13 22 6.50 0.085 17 9 9 6.50 0.085 30 14 23 7.00 0.092 18 10 10 7.00 0.092 32 16 25 7.50 0.098 19 11 11 7.50 0.098 35 17 27 8.00 0.105 21 11 11 8.00 0.105 37 18 29 8.50 0.111 22 12 12 8.50 0.111 39 19 31 9.00 0.118 23 13 13 9.00 0.118 41 20 32 9.50 0.124 25 13 13 9.50 0.124 44 21 34 10.00 0.131 26 14 14 10.00 0.131 46 22 36 10.50 0.138 27 15 15 10.50 0.138 48 23 38 Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-25 Section 3 I I TILIZA TION AREA LIQUID MANURE APPLICATION CHART LIQUID MANURE APPLICATION CHART MANURE ANALYSIS MANURE ANALYSIS (As received lb/1000 gal) (As received Ib/1000 gal) Total P205 K20 P205 K20 Test Date: 03/06/13 5.74 2.47 4.86 Test Date: 03/06l13 2.87 0.81 2.39 Source: Small Wastewater Storage Ponds Source: Big Wastewater Storage Pond Manure Nutrient Content Manure Nutrient Content Manure Thickness Manure Thickness Applied to apply Total P205 K20 Applied to apply TOtal P205 K20 (Gallons/Ac (inches/Ac) (lb/A) (lb/A) (lb/A) (Gallons/Ac) (inches/Ac) (lb/A) (lb/A) (lb/A) 2,715 0.10 16 7 13 2,715 0.10 8 2 6 5,431 0.20 31 13 26 5,431 0.20 16 4 13 8,146 0.30 47 20 40 8,146 0.30 23 7 19 10,862 0.40 62 27 53 10,862 0.40 31 9 26 13,577 0.50 78 34 66 13,577 0.50 39 11 32 16,292 0.60 94 40 79 16,292 0.60 47 13 39 19,008 0.70 109 47 92 19,008 0.70 55 15 45 21,723 0.80 125 54 106 21,723 0.80 62 18 52 24,439 0.90 140 60 119 24,439 0.90 70 20 58 27,154 1.00 156 67 132 27,154 1.00 78 22 65 29,869 1.10 171 74 145 29,869 1.10 86 24 71 32,585 1.20 187 80 158 32,585 1.20 94 26 78 35,300 1.30 203 87 172 35,300 1.30 101 29 84 38,016 1.40 218 94 185 38,016 1.40 109 31 91 40,731 1.50 234 101 198 40,731 1.50 117 33 97 43,446 1.60 249 107 211 43,446 1.60 125 35 104 46,162 1.70 265 114 224 46,162 1.70 132 37 110 48,877 1.80 281 121 238 48,877 1.80 140 40 117 51,593 1.90 296 127 251 51,593 1.90 148 42 123 54,308 2.00 312 134 264 54,308 2.00 156 44 130 Moisan Dairy AWMP Pace 3-26 Section 3 TILIZA TI ON AREA LIQUID MANURE APPLICATION CHART LIQUID MANURE APPLICATION CHART MANURE ANALYSIS MANURE ANALYSIS (As received lb/1000 gal) (As received lb/1000 gal) Total P205 K20 Total P205 K20 Test Date: 12/23/2013 5.71 1.32 7.62 Test Date: 12/23l2013 1.95 0.58 3.94 Source: Small Wastewater Storage Ponds Source: Big Wastewater Storage Pond Manure Nutrient Content Manure Nutrient Content Manure Thickness Manure Thickness to Total P205 K20 to Total P205 K20 (Gallons/Ac (inches/Ac) (lb/A) (lb/A) (lb/A) (Gallons/Ac) (inches/Ac) (lb/A) (lb/A) (lb/A) 2,715 0.10 16 4 21 2,715 0.10 5 2 11 5,431 0.20 31 7 41 5,431 0.20 11 3 21 8,146 0.30 47 11 62 8,146 0.30 16 5 32 10,862 0.40 62 14 83 10,862 0.40 21 6 43 13,577 0.50 78 18 103 13,577 0.50 26 8 53 16,292 0.60 93 22 124 16,292 0.60 32 9 64 19,008 0.70 109 25 145 19,008 0.70 37 11 75 21,723 0.80 124 29 166 21,723 0.80 42 13 86 24,439 0.90 140 32 186 24,439 0.90 48 14 96 27,154 1.00 155 36 207 27,154 1.00 53 16 107 29,869 1.10 171 39 228 29,869 1.10 58 17 118 32,585 1.20 186 43 248 32,585 1.20 64 19 128 35,300 1.30 202 47 269 35,300 1.30 69 20 139 38,016 1.40 217 50 290 38,016 1.40 74 22 150 40,731 1.50 233 54 310 40,731 1.50 79 24 160 43,446 1.60 248 57 331 43,446 1.60 85 25 171 46,162 1.70 264 61 352 46,162 1.70 90 27 182 48,877 1.80 279 65 372 48,877 1.80 95 28 193 51,593 1.90 295 68 393 51,593 1.90 101 30 203 54,308 2.00 310 72 414 54,308 2.00 106 31 214 Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-27 Section 3 Nutrient Concentration in 500 TILIZA TION AREA NUTRIENT APPLICATION CHART for WASTEWATER 14 3,500 12 Nutrients. to Apply 3-000 ?o?50lb 3 -D-100|b 10 +150?: 2500 .5 8 2,000 6 1,500 5 4 1,000 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.Application in Inches MoisaBDairy AWMP Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA uo; u! tuamnN NUTRIENT APPLICATION CHART for SOLIDS 20 i I . Nutrients to Apply +50 lb -D-100 lb -&-150 lb i -o?2oo Application in Tons/Acre Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-29 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Moisan Dairy AWMP Paie?3-3O Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA IRRIGATION WATER MANAGEMENT The application of Irrigation Water Management to the irrigated fields as shown on the Field Map will manage soil moisture to promote the desired crop response, optimize the available water supplies, minimize irrigation induced erosion, decrease non-point source pollution of surface and groundwater sources, manage salts in the crop root zone and manage the crop micro climate. Irrigation water is supplied by wells and surface water sources using pumps through an underground pipelines to sprinkler irrigation systems. The average amount of irrigation water to be applied per application and total annual amount needed for irrigated crops with guidance on when and how much irrigation water to apply can be found starting on page 3-33. Permits: Under Oregon law all water is publicly owned and anyone planning to store or divert surface or groundwater for the purpose of irrigation must obtain a permit or water right from the Oregon Water Resources Department. These permits or water rights must be obtained prior to the use of the water. It is the responsibility of the Farmer to ?le for the necessary permits or water rights. Permits or water rights are not needed to apply wastewater as a nutrient source. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-31 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Irrigation Water Flows, Volumes, and Relationships Equation 1- where: flow rate (acre-in/hr or cfs) time (hr) gross depth applied (in) A area (acres) Equation 2- xH where: i flow rate (gpm) A area (acres) gross application depth (in) irrigation period (days) hours of operation per day Water Flow Rates: 1 cubic foot per second (cfs) 448.8 gallons per minute 1 for 1 hour 0.99 acre-inch 1 for 24 hr 1.98 acre-? 1,000 2.23 1,000 for 24 hr 4.42 ac-? 1 gpm/acre 0.053 ac-in/aclday 1 40 miner's inches in OR, No CA 1 50 miner?s inches in ID. WA 1 miner's inch 11.22 in OR 1 miner's inch liters/sec 1 cubic meter/sec 35.3 1 liter/sec 15.85 where: cfs. hr; inches depth; A acres for 5 ?le velocity in PVC pipe: 6" la" |10" 480 800 I 1250 1750 I 2150 m" "Natural Resources - Conservation Service Water Volumes Weights: 1 cubic foot 7.48 gallons 62.4 lb 28.3 liters 1 acre-foot 43,560 cubic feet (1 acre covered 1 it deep) 12 acre-in 1 acre-ft 325.829 gal 1 million gallons 3.07 acre-ft 1 acre-ft 1,234 cubic meters 1 cu meter 1,000 liters 35.3 cu 0 Pressure and Pressure Head: 1 psi 2.31 ft of pressure head 1 atmosphere (sea level) 14.7 psi 33.9 ft of head and Areas: 1 mile 5,280 ft 1.61 km 1 meter 3.28 ft 39.37 inches 1 acre 43,560 square ft 1 hectare 2.47 acres Pump Power Requirement Pump Head in 11 Horsepower . 39 .6x%Punp E?icrency Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-32 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA SOILS- Based on the Natural Resources Conservation Service National Engineering Handbook, Part 652, National Irrigation Guide, the irrigated soils on this farm have an average water holding capacity of 0.15 to 0.25 inches per inch of soil depth and a soil intake rate of 0.35 to 0.55 inches per hour. CROPS- MAXIMUM MATURE ROOT ALLOWED CRITICAL CROP DEPTH (INCHES) DEPLETION PERIOD Grass HayIPasture 30 50% July Alfalfa Hay 48 50% - July Corn for Silagei 42 50% July Above data are from EM8713, Western Oregon Irrigation Guides, June 1998, OSU: Corvallis, OR and NRCS Irrigation Guide (National Engineering Handbook, Part 652). IRRIGATION WATER SUPPLY- Certi?cates- 1844, 2395, 2843. 2844, 3526, 33965, Description of Oregon Water Right: 35672, 56064, 56267, 60599 Description of Irrigation Water Supply (wen, Stream, Irrigation District, eta): Wells and Surface Water Sources Supply Flowrate (gpm or cfs): 2,735 or 6.09 Annual Volume Available 1,218.5 Acre-Feet Water Delivery Schedule: On Demand Method(s) of Water Measurement: Unknown IRRIGATION SYSTEM- System Nozzle Application System Capacity Size Pressure Spacing Rate Efficiency System (9me (in) (psi) (ft) (inlhr) Traveling Big Gun Sprinkler 335 1Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-33 Section 3 TILIZA TI ON AREA Irrigation Water Management Worksheet Crop Name: HayIPasture Land Managed Rooting Depth (inches): 30 Management Allowed Depletion, MAD: 50% Irrigated Acres: 15.9 Soil Name: Chehalis Soil Depth (inches): 80 Available Water Capacity (in/in): 0.20 Soil Intake Rate (in/hr): 0.40 IRRIGATION REQUIREMENT Month How MUCH waler *0 apply? April May June July August Sept I Total Plant Available Water Capaity Soil or Root Depth Available Water Capacity Net Irrigation Application Total Plant Available Water Capacity MAD 3'0 3'0 3'0 3'0 3'0 3'0 Irrigation System Application Rate (in/hrDetermined based on the type of Irrigation System IRRIGATION TIMING WHEN to apply water? Net Irrigation Water Requireent (From OSU Extension Miscellaneous Pub 8530. 1992) 1'57 3'15 4'57 6'22 5'12 3'46 Average Daily Crop Water Use (in/day): 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.17 0.12 Irrigation Frequency (days): Net Irrigation Application Daily Crop Water Use 30 3O 20 15 18 26 Irrigation System Set Time (hours): 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 Actual Net Irrigation Application Gross Application System Application Efficiency Actual Irrigation Frequency (days): Actual Net Irrigation Application Daily Crop WaterUse 30 20 13 1o 12 17 IRRIGATION SYSTEM CAPACITY stem Apliion ffiien Water Required Water Applied Gross Irrigation Application System Application Rate System Set Time Volume Of Water per Irrigation (acre?inGross Irrigation Application Irrigated Acres Irrigation System Operation (hoursfdayRequired System Flow Rate (9pm): (Equation Compare Required system flow rate with Measure flow noted on Irrigation Application Record Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-34 TILIZA TION AREA Crop Name: Irrigation Water Management Worksheet Alfalfa Section 3 Managed Rooting Depth (inches): 48 Management Allowed Depletion, MAD: 50% Irrigated Acres: 152 Soil Name: Cloquato, Newberg Soil Depth (inches): 60 Available Water Capacity (in/in): 0.20 Soil intake Rate (in/hr): IRRIGATION REQUIREMENT HOW MUCH water to apply? 0.40 Month Total Plant Available Water Capacity Soil or Root Depth Available Water Capacity Net Irrigation Application Total Plant Available Water Capacity MAD Irrigation System Application Rate (i n/ hr): Determined based on the type of Irrigation System IRRIGATION TIMING WHEN to apply water? Net Irrigation Water Requirement (From OSU Extension Miscellaneous Pub 8530, 1992) Average Daily Crop Water Use (i n/day): Irrigation Frequency (days): Net Irrigation Application Daily Crop Water Use Irrigation System Set Time (hours): Actual Net Irrigation Application Grass Application System Application Efficiency Actual Irrigation Frequency (days): Actual Net Irrigation Application I Daiiy Crop WaterUse IRRIGATION SYSTEM CAPACITY Ii"'l" l'Ti'T i'y'l Application Efficiency Water Required Water Applied Gross Irrigation Application System Application Rate System Set Time Volume of Water per Irrigation (acre?in): Gross Irrigation Application Irrigated Acres Irrigation System Operation (hours/day): Required System Flow Rate (9pm): (Equation 2) Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-35 Compare Required system flow rate with Measure flow noted on Irrigation Application Record April May June July August Sept 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.98 2.83 4.25 5.79 4.76 3.19 0.03 0.09 0.14 0.19 0.15 0.7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.70% 70% 70% 2.85 2.85 2.85 2.85 2.85 2.409 561 871 1,148 944 654 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Irrigation Water Management Worksheet Crop Name: Corn Silage Managed Rooting Depth (inches): 48 Management Allowed Depletion, MAD: 50% Irrigated Acres: 292 Soil Name: Cloquato, Newberg Soil Depth (inches): 60 Available Water Capacity (in/in): 0.20 Soil Intake Rate (in/hr) 0.40 IRRIGATION REQUIREMENT . Month HOW MUCH To apply? - - April May June July August Sept Total Plant Available aterCapacity Soil or Root Depth Available Water Capacity 96 9'6 9'6 9'6 9'6 9?6 Net Irrigation Application Total Plant Available Water Capacity MAD 4'8 4'8 4'8 4?8 4'8 4'8 Irrigation System Application Rate (in/hr): Determined baSed on the type of Irrigtion System 0'38 0'38 0'38 0'38 038 0.38 IRRIGATION TIMING WHEN to apply water? Net Irrigation Water Requirement (From OSU Extension Miscellaneous Pub 8530, 1992) 0'00 0'47 3'62 7'13 5'83 1'06 Average Daily Crop Water Use (in/day): 0.00 0.02 0.12 0.23 0.19 0.04 Irrigation Frequency (days): Net Irrigation Application Daily Crop Water Use 30 31 30 21 26 30 Irrigation System Set Time (hours): 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 Actual Net Irrigation Application Gross Application System Application Efficiency 2'00 2'00 2'00 2'00 2'00 2'00 Actual Irrigation Frequency (daysActual Net Irrigation Application Daily Crop WaterUse IRRIGATION SYSTEM CAPACITY System Application Efficiency 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% Water Required Water Applied System 2-85 2-85 2-85 2-85 2-85 2-85 832 832 832 832 832 832 Irrigation System Operation (hoursidayRequired System Flow Rate (gpm): 785 760 1,425 2,716 2,221 785 (Equation 2) Compare Required System flow rate with Measure flow noted on Irrigation Application Record Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 3-36 I SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Section 4 SOIL MAP 5 ?95d: 0 300 600 1200 1800 ?-Feet A 1000 2000 4000 6000 Moisan Dairy AWMP page 4-1 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Sol Map?Marion County Area. Oregon Moisan Daiy Map Unit Leend Marion County Area. Oregon [011643] Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of .1101 Am Amity silt loam 4.0 Ca Camas gravelly sandy loam 8.2 1.1% Ch Chehalis silty clay loam 46.9 6.2% Cm Cloquato sill loam 375.9 49.4% Mb McBee silty clay loam 75.3 10.0% Nu Neaberg ?ne sandy loam 48.3 6.1% Nw Newberg silt loan 10.0% PITS Pits 4.1 11.5% Te Terrace escarpments 6.2 0.3% Water 26.6 3.5% We Wapato silly clay loam 9119 111151. Totals for Area of Interest 761.0 100.056 Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-2 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT SOIL REPORTS Map Unit Description The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions in this report. along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identi?ed and named according to the taxonomic classi?cation of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely de?ned limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits de?ned for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identi?ed by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identi?ed in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides suf?cient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to de?ne and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have pro?les that are almost alike make up a soil series. All the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of a given series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-3 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. Additional information about the map units described in this report is available in other soil reports, which give properties of the soils and the limitations, capabilities, and potentials for many uses. Also, the narratives that accompany the soil reports de?ne some of the properties included in the map unit descriptions. Report?Map Unit Description Marion County Area, Oregon Am?Amity silt loam Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 24ns Elevation: 120 to 350 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 45 inches Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 54 degrees Frost-free period: 190 to 210 days Farmland classi?cation: Prime farmland if drained Map Unit Composition Amity and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Amity Setting Landform: Terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear, convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Mixed silty alluvium Typical pro?le H1 - 0 to 24 inches: silt loam H2 - 24 to 37 inches: silty clay loam H3 - 37 to 60 inches: silt loam Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 inlhr) Depth to water table: About 6 to 18 inches Frequency of ?ooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in pro?le: High (about 12.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classi?cation (irrigated): 2w Land capability classi?cation (nonirrigated): 2w Hydrologic Soil Group: CID Other vegetative classi?cation: Poorly Drained (GOOZXY006OR) Minor Components Concord Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Concave Other vegetative classi?cation: Poorly Drained (GOOZXYOOSOR) Ca?Camas gravelly sandy loam Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 24nw Elevation: 130 to 500 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 45 inches Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 54 degrees Frost-free period: 200 to 210 days Farmland classi?cation: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Camas and similar soils: 85 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Camas Setting Landform: Flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Recent alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock Typical profile H1 - 0 to 9 inches: gravelly sandy loam H2 - 9 to 60 inches: very gravelly sand Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-5 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 9 to 17 inches to strongly contrasting textural strati?cation Natural drainage class: Excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting Iayerto transmit water(Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 inlhr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of ?ooding: Frequent Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in pro?le: Very low (about 0.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classi?cation (irrigated): 4w Land capability classi?cation (nonirrigated): 4w Hydrologic Soil Group: A Other vegetative classi?cation: Well drained 15% Slopes (GOOZXYOOZOR) Ch?Chehalis silty clay loam Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 24ny Elevation: 100 to 650 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 45 inches Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 54 degrees Frost-free period: 200 to 210 days Farmland classi?cation: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Chehalis and similar soils: 85 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Chehalis Setting Landform: Flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium Typical pro?le H1 - 0 to 9 inches: silty clay loam H2 - 9 to 80 inches: silty clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Section 4 Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksa?: Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 inlhr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of ?ooding: Rare Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in pro?le: High (about 11.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classi?cation (irrigated): 1 Land capability classi?cation (nonirrigated): 1 Hydrologic Soil Group: Other vegetative classi?cation: Well drained 15% Slopes (GOOZXYOOZOR) Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-6 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Cm?Cloquato silt loam Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 24p1 Elevation: 100 to 650 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 45 inches Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 54 degrees Frost-free period: 200 to 210 days Farmland classi?cation: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Cloquato and similar soils: 85 percent Estimates are based On observations, descriptiOns, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Cloquato Setting Landform: Flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium Typical pro?le H1 - 0 to 9 inches: silt loam H2 - 9 to 41 inches: silt loam H3 - 41 to 83 inches: silt loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of ?ooding: Occasional Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in pro?le: High (about 10.9 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classi?cation (irrigated): None speci?ed Land capability classi?cation (nonirrigated): 2w Hydrologic Soil Group: Other vegetative classification: Well drained 15% Slopes (GOOZXYOOZOR) Mb?McBee silty clay loam Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 24qg Elevation: 100 to 650 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 45 inches Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 54 degrees Frost-free period: 200 to 210 days Farmland classi?cation: All areas are prime farmland Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-7 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Map Unit Composition Mcbee and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Mcbee Setting Landform: Flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parentmaterial: Mixed alluvium Typical profile H1 - 0 to 10 inches: silty clay loam H2 - 10 to 65 inches: clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderater high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 24 to 36 inches Frequency of ?ooding: Occasional Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in pro?le: High (about 10.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classi?cation (irrigated): 2w Land capability classi?cation (nonirrigated): 2w Hydrologic Soil Group: Other vegetative classification: Moderately Well Drained 15% Slopes (G002XYOO4OR) Minor Components Wapato Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear. concave Across-slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classi?cation: Poorly Drained (GOOZXYOOSOR) Nu?Newberg ?ne sandy loam Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 24r2 Elevation: 100 to 650 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 45 inches Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 54 degrees Frost-free period: 200 to 210 days Farmland classi?cation: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Newberg and similar soils: 85 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-8 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Description of Newberg Setting Landform: Flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Mixed alluvium over sandy or gravelly material Typical pro?le H1 - 0 to 10 inches: ?ne sandy loam H2 - 10 to 60 inches: sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting Iayerto transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of ?ooding: Occasional Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in pro?le: Moderate (about 8.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classi?cation (irrigated): 2w Land capability classi?cation (nonirrigated): 2w Hydrologic Soil Group: A Nw?Newberg silt loam Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 24r3 Elevation: 100 to 650 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 45 inches Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 54 degrees Frost-free period: 200 to 210 days Farmland classi?cation: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Newberg and similar soils: 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Newberg Setting Landform: Flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Mixed alluvium over sandy or gravelly material Typical profile H1 - 0 to 10 inches: silt loam H2 - 10 to 60 inches: sandy loam Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-9 Section 4 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of ?ooding: Occasional Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in pro?le: High (about 9.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classi?cation (irrigated): 2w Land capability classi?cation (nonirrigated): 2w Hydrologic Soil Group: A Map Unit Composition Pits: 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Pits Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 90 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 0 inches to lithic bedrock Interpretive groups Land capability classi?cation (irrigated): None speci?ed Land capability classi?cation (nonirrigated): 8 Te?Terrace escarpments Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 24rp Elevation: 50 to 1,000 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees Frost-free period: 165 to 210 days Farmland classi?cation: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Terrace escarpments: 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Terrace Escarpments Typical pro?le H1 - 0 to 8 inches: silt loam H2 - 8 to 48 inches: gravelly loam H3 - 48 to 60 inches: very cobbly clay loam Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-10 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Properties and qualities Slope: 20 to 40 percent Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderater high (0.20 to 0.57 inlhr) Depth to water table: About 36 to 72 inches Available water storage in pro?le: Moderate (about 8.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classi?cation (irrigated): None speci?ed Land capability classi?cation (nonim'gated): 6e W?Water Map Unit Composition Water: 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Wc?Wapato silty clay loam Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 24M Elevation: 100 to 650 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 45 inches Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 54 degrees Frost-free period: 200 to 210 days Farmland classi?cation: Prime farmland if drained and either protected from ?ooding or not frequently ?ooded during the growing season Map Unit Composition Wapato and similar soils: 90 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Wapato Setting Landform: Flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Concave, linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Mixed alluvium Typical pro?le H1 - 0 to 16 inches: silty clay loam H2 - 16 to 60 inches: silty clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 inlhr) Depth to water table: About 0 to 6 inches Frequency of ?ooding: Frequent Frequency of ponding: Frequent Available water storage in pro?le: High (about 10.2 inches) Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-1 1 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Interpretive groups Land capability classi?cation (irrigated): 3w Land capability classi?cation (nonirrigated): 3w Hydrologic Soil Group: CID Other vegetative classi?cation: Poorly Drained (GOOZXYOOGOR) Data Source Information Marion County Area, Oregon Version 11, Sep 15, 2014 Soil Survey Area: Survey Area Data: Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-12 Section 4 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT PREDICTED SOIL EROSION USDA tiittili. ?3125?? BU-SLEZ Worksheet Erosion Calculation Record Info: Owner name Tract Field name Moisan Dairy NA A . . value, Slope length Avg. slope Location so" t/ac/yr (horlz), ft steepness, Oregon\Marion Ch CHEHALIS SILTY CLAY silty 5 0 900 3 0 County\OR_Marion R40-44 clay loam 85% Alternatives: Wind . St?ps Cons Soil STIR irrigation Equ'v Energy Fuel Descriptio Contourin . Diversion/terrace conditionln -i'nduced . cost, Management 9 barrier sediment basin plan. 9 index valu erosion diesel use, sail use, loss (SCI) for gaI/ac Vac/yr a.Single Year/Single Crop . Templates\A_Pasture a. rows fall planted, 5 up-and- (none) (none) 0.28 0.98 37.5 0 25 3400000 73.6 as rotational grazing, down hill manure application, CMZ 53 The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind, severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cr0pping rotation as shown in the management description. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-13 NRCS SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT worksheet Erosion Calculation Record Section 4 Info: Owner name Tract# Field name Moisan Dairy NA B, D, E, . . value, Slope length Avg. slope Locahon so? t/ac/yr (horiz), ft steepness, Oregon\Marion Cm CLOQUATO SILT silt 5 0 900 3 0 loam 85% Alternatives: Wind Cons. - irrigation- Equiv. . . . Sail . . Energy Fuel . . . Drversron/terrace, plan. . . . STIR induced diesel Description management contouring barriers sediment basin soil value erosion use, 83%? (1080326 loss ex for gal/ac ac t/ac/yr a.Single d. relative Erosion on Year/Single Crop row grade Corn Templates\A_Corn, 1 percent (none) (none) 3.6 -0.76 220 0 6.5 890000 19.4 Silage silage; spring CT, of slope CMZ53 grade The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth. surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind. severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management description. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4?14 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT USDA 23:51:? RUSLEZ Worksheet Erosion Calculation Record info: Owner name Tract Field name Moisan Dairy NA . . value, Slope length Avg. slope Locahon so? Vac/yr (hon'z), ft steepness, Oregon\Marion Nw NEWBERG SILT silt 3 0 900 3 0 County\OR_Marion R36-40 loam 100% Alternatives: Wind 8. Cons. . Equlv. . . . Sorl . . Energy Fuel . . . Drversron/terrace, plan. .. . STIR induced diesel Description Management Contouring barriers sediment basin 30? conditioning vame erosion use, use, cost, loss index (SCI) for gal/ac t/ac/yr a.SingIe d. relative Erosion on Year/Single Crop row grade Corn Templates\A_Corn, 1 percent (none) (none) 3.2 -0.72 220 0 6.5 890000 19.4 Silage silage; spring CT, of slope grade The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind, severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management descnp?on. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-15 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Di linuial Sonia Worksheet Erosion Calculation Record lnfo: Owner name Tract# Field name Moisan Dairy NA F, I, J, . . value, Slope length Avg. slope Locanon so? t/ac/yr (horlz), ft steepness, OregomMarion Cm CLOQUATO SILT silt 5 900 3 0 loam 85% Alternatives: Wind 8. Cons. . lrrigation- Equiv. . . . Sail . . Energy Fuel . . . Diversron/terrace, plan. . . . STIR induced diesel Desmmon Management contouring barriers sediment basin soil value erosion use, 831.3350 Ugg?c loss for SCI, gal/ac t/ac/yr a.Single Year/Single Erosion on mm) a' rows Alfalfa Templates\A_Alfalfa, up-and- (none) (none) 0.65 0.78 25.5 0 23 3100000 67.7 hay; fall seed, 5 yr, down hill CT, CMZ 53 The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value. soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind, severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management description. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-16 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT USDA 3.133%? RUSLEZ Worksheet Erosion Calculation Record lnfo: Owner name Tract Field name Moisan Dairy NA . value, Slope length Avg. slope Locahon 80? t/ac/yr (horiz), ft steepness, Oregon\Marion Nu NEWBERG FINE SANDY ?ne 3 900 3 sandy loam 85% Alternatives: Wind . . cons Soil irrigation Equ Fuel Descriptio Mane ement Contourin Diversion/terrace [an conditionin -induced di?sel cost, sediment basin 9 index erosion scil use, loss (SCI) for SCI, gaI/ac t/ac/yr a.Single Year/Single . Crop 3. rows Ergff'gl?a?" Templates\A_Alfalfa up-and- (none) (none) 0.51 0.79 25.5 20 2300000 60.9 hay; fall seed, 5 yr. down hill CT, CMZ 53 The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind, severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management description. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-17 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT NRCS RUSLEZ Worksheet Erosion Calculation Record Info: Owner name Tract Field name Moisan Dairy NA . . value, Slope length Avg. slope Location so" t/ac/yr (horlz), ft steepness, Oregon\Marion Wc WAPATO SILTY CLAY silty 5 0 900 3 0 clay loam 90% Alternatives: Wind 8. . Strips cons Soil STIR irrigation Eqmv Energy Fuel Descriptio Contourin . Diversion/terrace conditionln -lnduced . cost, Management 9 banner sediment basin plan. 9 index valu erosion diesel use, 30:! use, loss for SCI, gayac t/ac/yr a.Single Year/Single . Crop a. rows 0? Templates\A_Alfalfa up?and- (none) (none) 0.60 0.96 25.5 28 390000 84.6 Alfalfa . . 0 . hay, fall seed, 5 yr, down hill CT, CMZ 53 The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. it utilizes the Speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind. severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management description. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4?18 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT USDA 23:3,. Worksheet Erosion?CalcuIation Record Info: Owner name Tract# Field name Moisan Dairy NA . . value, Slope length Avg. slope Locahon so? t/ac/yr (horiz), ft steepness, Oregon\Marion Cm CLOQUATO SILT silt 5 0 900 3 0 loam 85% Alternatives: Wind . Cons . . . . Equrv Descriptio Mane ement Contourin Diversion/terrace I?n conggonin die?sel [53:29), sediment basin 9 index erosion 3 30:1 9 use, loss for SCI, gal/ac t/ac/yr a.Slngie Year/Single Erosion on Templatecisrloi?tp Orchard a' rows 120000 Filberts jestablishgd; no up-andl? (none) (none) 3.3 0.18 46.6 0 8.8 0 28.3 down hill cover crop, clean tilled, CMZ53 The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind, severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management description. Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-19 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT OREGON PHOSPHORUS INDEX FIELD Grower: Moisan Dairy Application Plan by: Bruce D. Wilson. Engineering LLC Enter data in gray cells and select best choice from drop down menus. Date: March 4, 2015 Cells with blue font are completed automatically. Field A Acres 15.9 32.1 14.5 59.5 145.0 28.0 40.5 33.2 50" Ch. CHEHALIS Cm. CLOQUATO 1v Nw, 7 Cm. CLOQUATO Crn, Cm, CLOQUATO Cm. CLOQUATO Nu, NEWBERG Soll test date December 26. 2013 August 25. 2014 August 26. 2014 August 26. 2014 March 8.2013 February 26. 2013 February 26. 2013 February 26. 2013 Bray 1 (ppmAcetate (ppm) 1.226 1.136 824 817 175 590 364 368 pH 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.3 6.5 6.3 6.5 6.5 5MP 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.8 6.7 6.8 6.8 TRANSPORT FACTORS Sheets- rill erosion (tonslac-yr) I113. 3 . . . Irrigation erosion {tonslac-yr) . .. .3. mm" 995mg: 99.1769- . -1 "69- Runoff Class low low low low low low low low Flooding Frequency rare occasional occasional occasional occasional occasional occasional occasional Distance to stream <100ft 4:10011 >500lt 560ft 300-500ft <10CIli . .. . . . . I . .l Buffers 30 ft or NRCS spec. 30 it or NRCS spec. a 30 it or NRCS spec. 30 it or NRCS spec. 30 ft or NRCS spec. 30 it or NRCS spec. 30 it or NRCS spec. 313 it or NRCS specDrainage _no tiles no tiles V. no tifs no tiles no tiles no tiles no tiles no tiles SOURCE FACTORS Commercial P205 rate (IbsiacCommercjai p205 method None applied None applied None applied None applied None applied None applied None applied None applied commercial p205 timing _Norfappliecl I None applied None, applied None applied None applied- None applied IV None applied None applied Organic P205 rate (IbslacOrganic p205 method Not incorp. in 5 days Not incorp. in 5 days Not incorp. in 5 days Not incorp. in 5 days Nor incurp. in 5 days Not incorp. in 5 days Not intern. in 5 days Not incorp. in 5 days 4 . organic p205 timing All months possible All months possible All months possible All months possible V, All months possible All months possible All months possible All months possible SCORE 13.6 24.2 23.9 20.9 15.7 11.7 15.? 11.7 RUNOFF RATING Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Low Medium Low COMMENTS Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-20 FIELD SUMMARY 8: WESTERN OREGON INDEX Enter data in gray cells and select best choice from drop down menus. Cells with blue font are completed automatically. SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Grower: Application Plan by: Date: Section 4 Moisan Dairy Bruce D. Wilson. Engineering LLC March 4. 2015 Field Acres 18.1 31.0 19.3 14.8 18.4 Cm, CLOOUATO Cm, CLOQUATO WC. WAPATO I Cm. CLOQUATO Cm. CLOQUATO MARION COUNTY MARION COUNTY MARION COUNTY Soil test date February 26. 2013 February 26. 2013 March 8. 2013 November 10. 2010 March 8, 2013 Bray 1 (ppm) 24 24 20 23 13 Acetate (ppm6.5 6.7 6.3 5.6 6.0 5MP 6.8 6.3 6.8 6.8 6.5 TRANSPORT FACTORS Sheet8.rill erosion (tonsiac-yr) . -1 11.5.1.-. . Irrigation erosion (tonslaoyr) no irrig. runoff no irrig. runolf no irrig. runoff no irrig. runoff no irrig. runoff not irrigated not irrigated not irrigated Runoff Class low low medium low low none none none Flooding Frequency Occasional frequent occasional occasional none none none Distance to stream <100f1 7 <100h <100f1 c1001! >500? >50011 >50011 .. - . . .. . . i Buffers 30 ft or NRCS spec. 30ft or NRCS spec. 30ft or NRCS spec. 30 ft or NRCS spec. 30 ft or NRCS spec. 30110: NRCS spec. 30 ft or NRCS spec. 3011 or NRCS specDrainage no tiles no no tiles nrJ_tiles__ m" Inotiles' I no tiles Eitiles Em?? SOURCE FACTORS Commercial P205 rate (IbsiacCommercial p205 method None applied None applied :1 None applied VI None applied None applied None applied None applied None applied .. .. . . . . .. . . w. I. In? commercial p205 timing None applied None applied 2' None applied IV- None applied None applied None applied None applied El None applied Organic P205 Tate (lbslacOrganic P205 method Not incorp. in 5 days Not incorp. in 5 days Not incorp. in 5 days Not incorp. in 5 days Not incorp. in 5 days None applied None applied None applied ., .-.. . . . ., ., . .. . .. . . . . Organic p205 timing Ailments eerie . .. weeihaefls?ihle months were I. months. possible None applied _1 None aeP'ired Noneannlied SCORE 11.7 11.7 14.2 12.8 11.? 0.0 0.0 0.0 RUNOFF RISK RATING Low Low Medium Low Low Low Low Low COMMENTS Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-21 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-22 3? 3 . 3 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Section 4 A . Oregon Phosphorus Index Risk Interpretation 4 ..1 West Pl Score<13 East Pl Score<30 Low potential for movement from this site given current management practices and site characteristics. There is a low probability of an adverse impact to surface waters from losses on this site. Soil test and losses are likely to increase in future due to N- based nutrient management from animal manure. Nitrogen West PI Score 13-25 East Pl Score 30-100 Medium potential for movement from this site given current management practices and site characteristics. Practices should be introduced to reduce losses by surface runoff, subsurface ?ow, and erosion. Soil test and losses are likely to increase in future due to N- based nutrient management from animal manure. Nitrogen West PI Score >25-50 East Pl Score >100-400 High potential for movement from this site given current management practices and site characteristics. All practicable management practices to reduce losses through surface runoff, subsurface ?ow, or erosion should be implemented. Phosphorus West PI Score >50 East Pl Score >400 Very high potential for movement from this site given current management practices and site characteristics. Active remediation techniques should be implemented in an effort to reduce the loss potential from this site. No manure Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-23 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 4-24 Overview of CAFO General Permit Summary FILE COPY Annual Permit Fee For Questions! Additional Information General Permit Conditions Prohibited Discharges See permit section 82, p. 9 10 for full text. When Discharge ls Allowed Permit sections 32.3, p. 9; S2.C, pp. 9 a: lo. Moisan Dairy AWMP Section 5 REFERENCES A A Notice of Registration and Oregon Con?ned Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) I National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit Summary The Oregon CAFO General Permit No. [-2009 (permit) was issued by the Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA) and Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and became effective on June 29, 2009. The permit expires on May 31, 2014. A copy of the permit is enclosed. This Notice of Registration describes your speci?c permit registration information and an overview of permit requirements. Your permit registration was renewed to Permit No. 1-2009 on December 17, 2009. based on information provided by you as follows: Master Address No. AG-P0063169CAFG EPA Registration No. 0116010396 Operator Legal owuer, if different Name DONALD MOISAN Business Name MOISAN DAIRY Mailing Address 9165 WHEATLAND RD KEIZER. OR 97303 Facility Address 9165 WHEATIAND RD Keizer, OR 97303 Of?ce Pit 50380413576 Cell- Don 503/55 "1578 E-mail Address donsdairy@wildblue.net Maximum The maximum number ofanimals that may be held at this dairy CAFO is 1,900 dairy Number of animals based on the following population: 1,200 milking and dry cows, 200 heifers Animals (springer-s), and 500 calvas. You may not exceed this number by more than 10% or 25 animals, whichever is greater. without first providing ODA with a revised Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) and receiving written ODA approval. .Facility Based on the type and size of your operation, ODA has determined that you operate a Classification Large Concentrated CAFO. Note: Large Concentrated CAFOs have additional requirements. Please see general permit. Marion County Each ?scal year, you will be assessed an annual compliance fee of $25.00 to maintain your registration under this general permit. if you have questiOns, call your regional livestock water quality specialist for Area at (503) 986-6468 or the Salem office at (503) 986-4699. Additional CAFO program information is available on the intemet at it :Ilore v/ Die The operator must be in compliance with all terms and conditions of the permit (not only this summary of the permit) at all times. The following types of discharges are prohibited: Contaminated runoff ?'om confinement or waste accumulation areas; Over?ow or discharges from waste storage facilities; Discharges due to improper land application activities from surface drainages or ?eld tile outlets; Discharges due to equipment failure; and Leakage or seepage from facilities in the production area in excess of approved designs. Production Area: Discharges of process waste water to surface waters of the state are generally prohibited except: When rainfall events cause an overflow of process waste water ti'om a facility designed. constructed, operated, and maintained to contain all process-generated waste waters plus the runoff and direct precipitation from a 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event provided these discharges do not cause or contribute to a violation of state water quality standards; or 0 In the event of an upset or bypass condition. These conditions are ?zrther de?ned in the permit. All authorich discharges from the production area must be properly land applied or otherwise handled in a way that minimizes impacts on surface water and groundwater sources. Form 90009 Page 5-1 Section 5 REFERENCES A A WWuAr-ea: .AninaiWesm Managua: Requirement Pamitseetions3, WWusedatihelivemckom-mion. pp. 12-15. inpiementedaeeudingly. Storage Youmuetpmvide adequate storage capacity forsolidandliquidwestes atail?mes 30mm! application Requirement when soil and weedxer condi?onemsn?ehie. Permitseetion 32.3, p. 10. Monitoring. Recordkeepinga Large S4,pp. 16-19. [andAppiieation Waste Permitsections 82.0. pp.9& 10; pollution. mustbequan??abie, andbasedontheNRCS Phosphonusindex, Agronomy TeehnicalNeie #26, MW A ?11103ka Noncompihnce Note: Embargo p. 18. homoftlredtwharge. Pleas-e 986-64680r 986-4699. - . Annualkeport Permitsection S4.D.2, p. 18. Constructionof andWateWeter . - Conth swim-074.? Foe-allother Pennitsection 82.3.2.p. 10. Public Noticing Prior to approving new permit coverage, renewing permit coverage, or approving proposed substantial changes Participation to an AWMP, ODA will provide public notice and participation. Permit section pp. 1 s. Ray Natural Division P.2d!? mm Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 5-2 CAFO NPDES General Permit #01 -2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 OREGON ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATION NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER 01-2009 State of Oregon Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Division and Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Division In compliance with the provisions of Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 468B, Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) Chapter 603, Division 74, The Federal Water Pollution Control Act as Amended (The Clean Water Act), Title 33 United States Code, Section 1251 et seq., and The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Until this permit expires, is modi?ed, or revoked, permittees who have properly obtained coverage under this permit are authorized to discharge to waters of the state in accordance with the special and general conditions the follow. ?u Mid/aw Neil Mullahe Administrator Natural Resources Division Water Quality Division Oregon Department of Agriculture Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 2 of 24 DEFINITIONS ..3 SI. PERMIT COVERAGE 5 When is a Permit Required? .. 5 .B. Election of Permit Coverage .. 6 .C. Requirements and Schedule to Obtain Permit Coverage ..6 .D. What does this Permit Authorize? ..6 .E. Request for Cancellation .. 7 .F. Individual Permit Coverage .. 7 .0. Request for Con?dentiality .. 7 .H. Public Notice and Participation Requirements .. 7 S2. DISCHARGE LIMITATIONS AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS 9 SZ.A. DiScharge Limitations .. 9 82.3. Production Area Limitations .. 9 SZ.C. Land Application Limitations .. 9 82D. Direct Access by Animals to Surface Water in the Production Area Prohibited .. 10 SZ.E. Waste Storage Facilities ..10 SZ.F. Prevention of System Overloading .. 10 82.6. Handling of Animal Mortalities .. 10 82H. Proper Operation and Maintenance .. 10 82.I. Maintaining Compliance if System Fails .. 10 SZJ. Setback Requirement .. 11 SZ.K. Manure, Litter, or Process Waste Water Transfers .. 11 82.1. Proper Disposal of Other Wastes .. .. 1 SB. ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN 12 S3.A. Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) Implementation and Compliance .. 12 83.3. AWMP Submittal and Public Notice .. 12 S3.C AWMP Elements .. 12 S3.D. AWMP Updates and Changes .. 13 S4. MONITORING, INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING, AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS .. l6 S4.A. Monitoring Requirements .. 16 84.8. Inspection Requirements .. 17 S4.C. Record Keeping and Availability Requirements .. 17 S4.D. Reporting Requirements .. .. 17 $4.13. Additional Monitoring .. .. 19 GENERAL CONDITIONS G1. Noncompliance reporting requirements .. ..20 G2. Additional reporting requirements [40 CFR .. ..20 G3. Duty to comply[..21 G4. Compliance with other laws and statutes ..22 G5. Property rights [..22 66. Duty to reapply .. 22 G7. Need to halt or reduce activity not a defense [40 CFR .. 22 G8. Duty to mitigate [40 CFR .. ..22 G9. Proper operation and maintenance [40 CFR ..22 G10. Permit actions .. ..22 G11. Change of ownership or control ..22 G12. Duty to provide information [40 CFR ..22 G13. Inspection and entry [40 CFR ..23 G14. Monitoring and records [40 CFR ..23 615. Signatory requirement [40 CFR ..23 G16. Bypass [..23 G17. Upset [..24 Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 3 of 24 DEFINITIONS 1. ?ZS-year, 24-hour rainfall event? means an event with a probable recurrence interval of once in twenty-?ve years as de?ned by the National Weather Service in Technical Paper Number 40, ?Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States,? May 1961, or equivalent regional or state rainfall probability information developed from this source. 2. ?40 CFR means Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (2008). ?Animal waste management plan? or means a written document containing the minimum elements necessary to manage manure, litter, and process waste water from operations covered by this permit in accordance with the terms and conditions of this permit. See S3.C, p. 12, for speci?c plan elements. 4. or ?Con?ned animal feeding operation? as de?ned in OAR 603 -074-0010(3) and OAR 340-051-0010(2) means: The concentrated con?ned feeding or holding of animals or poultry, including but not limited to horse, cattle, sheep, or?swine feeding areas, dairy con?nement areas, slaughterhouse or shipping terminal holding pens, poultry and egg production facilities and fur farms; In buildings or in pens or lots where the surface has been prepared with concrete, rock or ?brous material to support animals in wet weather; or (ii) That have wastewater treatment works; or That discharge any wastes into waters of the state; or An animal feeding operation that is subject to regulation as a concentrated animal feeding operation pursuant to 40 CFR ?122.23. 5. ?Director? means the director of the State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and the Department of Agriculture or their authorized designee(s). 6. ?Discharge? when used without quali?cation means the ?discharge of a pollutant.? ?Discharge of a pollutant? is de?ned at 40 CFR ?122.2. 7. ?Frozen soil? means soil that has a soil temperature of 32? (or 0? C) or less in 3 continuous inches of the top twelve (12) inches of soil. ?Groundwater? means water in a saturated zone or stratum beneath the surface of land or below a surface water body. 9. ?Manure? means manure or other material bedding, compost, litter, feed waste, silage leachate, raw materials such as feed or silage) that comes into contact with manure. 10. ?Medium con?ned animal feeding operation? means a con?ned animal feeding operation that meets the animal numbers speci?ed in any of the following categories. A state medium con?ned animal feeding operation is only required to apply for this permit if it con?nes for more than four (4) months and has a waste water control facility or disposal system for wet g: dry wastes. (See Table I CAFOs Requiring Permit Coverage.) 200 to 699 mature dairy cattle, whether milked or dry; 300 to 999 veal calves; 300 to 999 cattle other than mature dairy cows or veal calves. Cattle includes but is not limited to heifers, steers, bulls and cow/calf pairs; 750 to 2,499 swine each weighing 55 pounds or more; 3,000 to 9,999 swine each weighing less than 55 pounds; (1) 150 to 499 horses; 3,000 to 9,999 sheep or lambs; 16,500 to 54,999 turkeys; 9,000 to 29,999 laying hens or broilers, if the operation uses waste water control facilities for wet waste; 0) 37,500 to 124,999 chickens (other than laying hens), if the operation uses waste water control facilities for wet waste; 25,000 to 81,999 laying hens, if the operation does not use waste water control facilities for wet waste; (1) 10,000 to 29,999 ducks if the operation does not use waste water control facilities for wet waste; or 1,500 to 4,999 ducks if the operation uses waste water control facilities for wet waste. For other animal types, ODA will determine the appropriate animal numbers by comparing the operation to the most similar animal type listed above. 11. ?New source? means any building, structure, facility, or installation from which there is or may be a ?discharge of pollutants,? the construction of which commenced after April 14, 2003. Moisan Dairy AWMP 12. l3. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 4 of 24 ?Over?ow? means the discharge of manure or process waste water resulting from the ?lling of waste water or manure storage structures beyond the point at which no more manure, process waste water, or storm water can be contained by the structure. ?Person? is de?ned at OAR ?Point source? is de?ned at 40 CF ?122.2. ?Pollutant? is de?ned in 40 CFR ?122.2. ?Pollution? or ?water pollution? as de?ned in ORS ?Process waste water? or ?process wastes? as de?ned at OAR 603-074-0010(17) and OAR 603-051-0010(2) means water directly or indirectly used in the operation of the CAFO for any or all of the following: spillage or over?ow from animal or poultry watering systems; washing, cleaning or flushing pens, barns, manure pits, or other CAFO facilities; direct contact swimming, washing, or spray cooling of animals; or dust control. Process waste water or process wastes also includes any water that comes into contact with any raw materials, products, or byproducts including manure, litter, feed, milk, eggs, or bedding. ?Production area? as de?ned at OAR 603-074-0010(18) and OAR 603-051-0010(3) means that part of a CAFO that includes the animal con?nement area, the manure storage area, the raw materials storage area, and the waste containment areas. The animal con?nement area includes but is not limited to open lots, housed lots, feedlots, con?nement houses, stall barns, ?'ee stall barns, milkrooms, milking centers, cowyards, bamyards, medication pens, walkers, animal walkways, and stables. The manure storage area includes but is not limited to lagoons, runoff ponds, storage sheds, stockpiles, under house or pit storages, liquid impoundments, static piles, and composting piles. The raw materials storage area includes but is not limited to feed silos, silage bunkers, and bedding materials. The waste containment areas include but are not limited to settling basins, and areas, within berms and diversions that separate uncontaminated storm water. Also included in the de?nition of production area is any egg washing or egg processing facility, and any area used in the storage, handling, treatment, or disposal of animal mortalities. ?Saturated soil? means soil with all available pore space ?lled that has reached its maximum retentive capacity as de?ned in ?Qualitative Description of Soil Wetness? (Brady, N. and Wei], R., p. 201). ?Setback? as de?ned at 40 CFR means a speci?ed distance from surface waters or potential conduits to surface waters where manure, litter, and process waste water may not be land applied. Examples of conduits to surface waters include but are not limited to: Open tile line intake structures, sinkholes, and agricultural well heads. ?State con?ned animal feeding operation? means a con?ned animal feeding operation with animal numbers below the medium con?ned animal feeding operation levels that is not designated as a small concentrated animal feeding operation. A small con?ned animal feeding operation is only required to apply for this permit if it con?nes for more than for (4) months and has a waste water control facility or disposal system for wet wastes. (See Table I: CAFOs Requiring Permit Coverage.) ?Vegetative buffer? as de?ned at 40 CFR means a narrow, permanent strip of dense perennial vegetation established parallel to the contours of and perpendicular to the dominant slope of the ?eld for the purposes of slowing water runoff, enhancing water in?ltration, and minimizing the risk of any potential nutrients or pollutants from leaving the ?eld and reaching surface waters. ?Wastes? is de?ned at ORS ?Waste storage facilities? means the physical system used for the isolation and retention of process wastes on the con?ned animal feeding operation until their ultimate utilization. ?Waste water control facility? means a ?disposal system? or ?treatment works? is de?ned at ORS ?Water? or ?waters of the state? is de?ned at ORS ?Waters of the is de?ned at 40 CFR ?122.2. Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 5 of 24 SPECIAL CONDITIONS Sl. PERMIT COVERAGE When is a Permit Required? 1. Pursuant to ORS 4688.200, it is the policy of the State of Oregon to protect the quality of groundwater and surface waters of Oregon by preventing animal wastes from discharging into waters of the state. To implement this policy, ORS requires that any person who owns or operates a con?ned animal feeding operation (CAFO) listed in 1 .A.2 below obtain a permit from ODA and DEQ. As a result, there is no state process to certify that a CAFO does not discharge or propose to discharge to waters of the state and permit coverage is required regardless of discharge status. Coverage under this general permit is required for all CAF Os listed in unless application is made for an individual permit or an individual permit is required by ODA and DEQ. 2. Any person who owns or operates a CAFO de?ned as follows is required by ORS to obtain coverage under this permit (see Table 1 below for more detail): State small con?ned animal feeding operation that con?nes animals for more than four (4) months and has a waste water control facility or disposal system for wet dry wastes. State medium con?ned animal feeding operation that con?nes animals for more than four (4) months and has a waste water control facility or disposal system for wet dry wastes. Small, medium, or large concentrated animal feeding operation de?ned in 40 CFR Table 1: CAFOs Requiring Permit Coverage CONFINED CONCENTRATED 0 Con?nes more than one animal for 0 Stabled or con?ned and fed or maintained for total of 45 days or more in any more than 4 months on prepared 12-month period Type of con?ned surface 0 Crops, vegetation, forage growth, or post-harvest residues not sustained in animal feeding normal growing season in lot or facility operation Small Con?ned Medium Con?ned Small Concentrated Medium Concentrated Large Concentrated requiring permit 0 Waste water 0 Waste water 0 Signi?cant contributor 0 Discharging [40 CFR coverage control facility control facility or of pollutants to waters pollutants to waters or disposal disposal system of the US. of the US. system for wet for wet dry 0 Designated by Director [40 CFR {5122-23 wastes wastes [40 CFR mature dairy cows' <200 200-699 <200 200-699 gm veal calves <300 300-999 <300 300-999 ?1,000 cattle2 <300 300-999 <300 300-999 21,000 swine 55 <750 750-2,499 <750 750-2,499 22,500 swine 55 <3,000 3,000-9,999 <3,000 3,000-9,999 ?10,000 horses <150 150-499 <150 150-499 2500 sheep or lambs <3,000 3,000-9,999 <3,000 3,000-9,999 210,000 turkeys <16,500 16,500-54,999 <16,500 16,500-54,999 $000 chickens, including laying hens <9,000 9,000-29,999 <9,000 9,000-29,999 230,000 brorlers w/wet waste system laymg hens W?d?y NA 25,000-31,999 <25,000 25,000-81,999 282,000 waste system Broiler chickens w/dry waste NA 37,500?124,999 <37,500 37,500-124,999 2125,000 system ducks mm? than <10,000 10,000-29,999 <10,000 10000-29399 230,000 wet waste system ducks w/wet waste system <1,500 1,500-4,999 <1,500 1,500-4,999 25,000 other animal type As determined by ODA3 Designated by director. NA NA 1 Whether milked or dry 2 Other than mature dairy cows or veal calves, cattle includes but is not limited to heifers, steers, bulls and cow/calf pairs. 3 To determine the number of animals that require permit coverage, ODA will compare the operation to the most similar animal type in the table. Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 3 l, 2014 Page 6 of 24 3. Any person not wishing to be covered by this permit may apply for an individual permit in accordance with OAR 340-045-0030. Note: Failure to obtain coverage under this permit is a violation of ORS 4688.050 and 4683.215 except as provided in Individual Permit Coverage, p. 7. Election of Permit Coverage Any person who owns or operates a CAFO who is not required to obtain coverage under this permit may elect to be covered by this permit. Any person making such an election is subject to all terms and conditions of the permit unless and until permit coverage is terminated. S1.C. Requirements and Schedule to Obtain Permit Coverage 1. Application for Proposed CAFO I To obtain permit coverage, any person proposing a new CAFO that is regulated by this permit (see SLA above) or electing to be covered by this permit must submit an ODA Application to Register (ATR) and Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) at least 180 days prior to the time that the operation commences. For information on AWMP requirements, see S3, p. 12. 2. Future Renewal of General Permit Coverage To renew general permit coverage, the pemittee must submit a renewal application by the date speci?ed by ODA but no later than the expiration date of this permit. 3. ODA will notify the applicant in writing if permit coverage is approved or denied. Permit coverage does not begin until this written notice is provided by ODA to the applicant. Written noti?cation will include a Notice of Registration that will include the following: The owner or operator's name; Facility name and location; Contact information including mailing address and telephone number; Effective date of permit coverage; Maximum number of animals allowed at the facility; and Regulatory status of the operation. ODA will use the following classi?cations for regulatory status: (1) Large concentrated animal feeding operation as de?ned in 40 CFR (2) Medium concentrated animal feeding operation as de?ned in 40 CFR (3) Small concentrated animal feeding operation as de?ned in 40 CFR and designated by the director pursuant to ORS 603 -074-00 12; (4) Medium con?ned animal feeding operation as de?ned in this permit p. or (5) Small confined animal feeding operation as de?ned in this permit p. 4). (ii) A small or medium con?ned animal feeding operation will be categorized as concentrated if: (I) A discharge to waters of the US. occurs that is not allowed by this general permit, and (2) The operator does not or cannot make the change(s) necessary to prevent such discharge ?'om recurring to the satisfaction of ODA. 4. Coverage under this permit will be canceled upon the issuance of an individual permit. S1.D. General Permit Coverage 1. Consistent with ORS 4683.200, ODA and DEQ developed this general permit to prohibit routine discharges of manure, litter, and process waste water from CAFO operations to waters of the state. Discharges of manure, litter, or process waste water to waters of the state are only expected to occur under extreme weather conditions and as limited by the conditions of this general permit. Further, the general permit only authorizes the discharge of pollutants resulting from the processes, wastes, and operations that have been clearly identi?ed in the permittee?s AWMP approved by ODA. Moisan Dairy AWMP SLF. SLH. CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 7 of 24 This permit does not cover disposal of human wastes or waste water control systems that mix human and animal wastes. Any person owning or operating such a system must apply to DEQ for coverage under an individual or general permit issued pursuant to ORS 4683050. This general permit for CAFOs may be used in addition to an individual or general permit issued by DEQ pursuant to ORS 4683.050. Except for any toxic effluent standards and prohibitions imposed under section 307 of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) and groundwater protection requirements established under OAR 340-040, a permittee in compliance with this permit during its term is considered to be in compliance, for purposes of enforcement, with state water quality laws and relevant sections of the CWA, as provided in 40 CFR ?122.5. The speci?c effect of permit compliance on enforcement authority is set out in OAR 340-045-0080. Request for Cancellation 1. Any permittee may request in writing to ODA that coverage under this permit be cancelled if: Conditions or standards have changed so that the CAFO no longer quali?es for or is required to have coverage under this permit; or - The CAFO no longer has animals on site and all waste storage and control facilities have been decommissioned in accordance with Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) conservation practice standard, code 360, entitled Closure of Waste Impoundments (Jan. 2006); and The permittee certi?es that it will not commence operation of a CAFO regulated by this permit at the same location without making a new application for registration under this general permit and is granted coverage or applies for and is issued an individual permit. ODA will respond to the request for cancellation by conducting a site inspection and a review of the permittee?s file. ODA will notify the permittee in writing of termination of coverage under this permit or deny the request with an explanation of why the request was denied. Individual Permit Coverage 1. When appropriate, the director may require any person to obtain an individual permit pursuant to OAR 340- 0033(10). In such cases, the person will be noti?ed in writing by the director. This written notice will include the reason why an individual permit is being required, an application form, the amount of the permit fee due at application, and application due date. If coverage under this permit has been obtained prior to the requirement for an individual permit, this permit will remain effective until the individual permit is issued provided the application for individual permit was properly made. Request for Confidentiality The name and address of an NPDES permit applicant or permittee, NPDES permit applications ODA ATRs) and their attachments AWMPs), NPDES permits, and NPDES permit discharge data cannot be kept con?dential pursuant to 40 CFR ?122.7(b) and For other information, the permittee may request that the director evaluate claims of con?dentiality according to the procedures established in ORS 468.0950). Public Notice and Participation Requirement 1. Prior to approving new permit coverage, renewing permit coverage, or approving proposed substantial changes to an AWMP, ODA will provide public notice and participation in Table 2 below. ODA may batch multiple notices as regionally appropriate. Application and permit documents ODA ATR, renewal application, AWMP) will be available for public review at ODA headquarters and appropriate ?eld of?ces. If available, electronic copies of documents will be provided upon request. Public hearings will be scheduled if written requests for public hearing are received during the comment period ?om at least ten persons or ?'om an organization or organizations representing at least ten persons. If a hearing is scheduled, ODA will provide at least 30 days notice before the hearing is held. The public comment period will remain open for additional comments for at least 7 days after the public hearing. Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 8 of 24 Table 2: CAFO Public Notice Requirements All operations Small or Medium Small, Medium or Con?ned Large Concentrated Permit Action 1. Receipt of ODA 1. Receipt of renewal 2. Receipt of proposed 3. Receipt of proposed ATR (Application application substantial change substantial change to Register) for to small or medium to small or medium, existing operation con?ned animal or large not under permit or feeding operation ?s concentrated new proposed AWMP animal feeding operation (see S3.D.1, p. 13) operation ?s AWMP (see S3.D.2, p. 14) Public Public notice of a Public notice of a Public notice of a Public notice of a Participation comment period of comment period of comment period of comment period of Process at least 35 days at least 35 days at least 14 days at least 35 days provided as provided as provided as provided as follows: follows: follows: follows: 0 Published in Posted on Posted on ODA 0 Posted on ODA regional ODA and and DEQ and DEQ newspaper; DEQ websites; and websites; and Posted on websites; and 0 Emailed to Emailed to ODA and Emailed to interested interested DEQ interested parties list parties list websites; and parties list maintained by maintained by 0 Emailed to maintained by ODA. ODA. interested ODA. (ii) Opportunity for (ii) Opportunity for parties list (ii) Opportunity for public hearing. See public hearing. See maintained by public hearing. p. 7. p. 7. ODAwritten response A written response (ii) Opportunity for A written response to relevant to relevant public hearing. to relevant comments will be comments will be See p. 7. comments will be developed by ODA developed by ODA A written response developed by and made available and made available to relevant ODA and made to interested parties. to interested parties. comments will be available to developed by interested parties. ODA and made available to interested parties. Contents of Name of operation Name of operation Name of operation Name of operation PUblic Notice Name of operator City, county, and City, county, and City, county, and Note! Access or owner if zip code zip code zip code to the AWMP different than 0 Permit registration 0 Permit registration 0 Permit registration will also be operator, mailing number number number PTOVfded for addreSS, and 0 Type of operation Type of operation 0 Type of operation pubhc rewew; telephone Dunlbel' Overview of 0 Overview of however, nOt 0 Physical address of proposed proposed AWMPS Operation substantial change substantial change be Type of operation ava'labl?? Number of animals electronically. proposed 0 Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUC S) AWMP summary Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01 -2009 Expiration Date: May 3 l, 2014 Page 9 of 24 SZ. DISCHARGE LIMITATIONS AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS SZ.A. Discharge Limitations The permittee is prohibited from discharging manure, litter, or process wastes to surface waters and groundwaters of the state, except as allowed in and SZ.C and provided these discharges allowed in and S2.C do not cause or contribute to a violation of state water quality standards. Discharges to surface water due to upset or bypass are authorized only in accordance with applicable requirements in 616 Bypass [40 CFR p. 23 and 017 Upset [40 CFR p. 24. Types of discharge that are prohibited include but are not limited to: contaminated runoff from con?nement or waste accumulation areas; over?ow or discharges from waste storage facilities; discharges due to improper land application activities from surface drainages or ?eld tile outlets, discharges due to equipment failure; or leakage or seepage from facilities in the production area in excess of approved designs. SZ.B. Production Area Limitations 1. For all small and medium con?ned animal teeding operations and smallI medium, and large concentrated animal (ceding operations, except new source swine. poultry. and veal large concentr_at_ed an_im_al operations: The permittee is prohibited from discharging manure, litter, or process waste water to surface waters of the state from the production area, except when: Rainfall events cause an over?ow of waste management and storage facilities designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to contain all manure, litter, and process waste waters including the contaminated runoff and direct precipitation from a 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event; and The production area is operated in accordance with the applicable inspection, maintenance, rccordkeeping, and reporting requirements of this permit. 2. For new source swine. poultry. and veal large concentrated teeding operations: The permittee is prohibited from discharging manure, litter, or process waste water to surface waters of the state. 3. The permittee must properly land apply or otherwise handle authorized discharges from the production area in a way that minimizes impacts on surface water or groundwater of the state and complies with state water quality standards. 4. The permittee must not exceed the seepage design rates approved by ODA for waste storage or animal con?nement facilities and seepage to groundwater from these facilities must not violate state groundwater quality protection standards. SZ.C. Land Application Limitations 1. When applying manure, litter, and process waste water to lands, the permittee must apply at agronomic rates in accordance with the permittee?s ODA-approved AWMP. Land application areas include land under the control of the permittee, whether it is owned, rented, or leased, to which manure, litter, or process waste water from the production area is or may be applied. 2. The permittee?s discharges to groundwater due to seepage below the root zone of the crop or by other means must not violate state groundwater quality protection standards. 3. The permittee is allowed to apply manure, litter, or process waste water to ?'ozen soil provided: Its AWMP addresses such applications [see Discharge to surface waters and groundwaters of the state will not occur, except as allowed in 82.8 and and (0) Land applications do not cause or contribute to a violation of state water quality standards. Moisan Dairy AWMP SZ.D. SZ.E. SZ.F. SZ.G. SZ.H. CAFO NPDES General Permit #01 -2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 10 of 24 4. The permittee is prohibited ?om applying manure, litter, or process waste water to saturated soils or during rainfall events that are expected to result in saturated soils or surface runoff. When such a application is a desired alternative to allowing waste storage or waste water control facilities to over?ow land application to saturated soils to pond waste water onsite provides for greater protection of surface waters than a direct over?ow of a waste storage tank to surface waters), the land application will be considered an upset condition and the permittee must comply with the provisions of 17 Upset [40 CFR p. 24. Direct Access by Animals to Surface Water in the Production Area Prohibited The permittee must prevent direct animal contact with surface waters of the state in the production area of its CAFO. Direct animal contact means any situation where animals in the production area have ?ee access and are allowed to loiter or drop waste in surface waters. Direct contact with surface waters by animals on pasture or rangeland is not, by itself, a violation of this permit. Waste Storage, Facilities 1 . 1. The permittee must provide adequate storage capacity for solid and liquid wastes at all times so that land application occurs only during periods when soil and weather conditions allow for agronomic application and are in compliance with the Land Application Limitations in Condition S2.C, p. 9 of this permit. 2. The permittee must site, design, construct, operate, and maintain all waste storage facilities consistent with the AWMP. New and modi?ed construction of waste facilities must be approved in advance and prior to construction by ODA in conformance with ORS 4683.055 and OARs 340-051 and 603-074. 3. The permittee with a large concentrated animal feeding operation must also have depth markers in all surface liquid impoundments lagoons, ponds, tanks) designed to clearly indicate the: Maximum design volume, Minimum capacity necessary to contain the 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event, including additional ?'eeboard requirements, and Depth of manure and process waste water. Prevention of System Overloading 1. The permittee may not increase the number of animals over 10% or 25 animals, whichever is greater, of the maximum number assigned by ODA in the Notice of Registration and General Permit Summary until an updated plan is approved in writing by ODA (see S3.B AWMP Submittal, p. 12, and 83D AWMP Changes, p. 13). 2. Animal numbers must not exceed the capacity of the waste storage facilities. Handling of Animal Mortalities The permittee must not dispose of animal mortalities in liquid manure or waste water control facilities. Animal mortalities must be handled in such a way as to prevent discharge of pollutants to surface water or groundwater. Proper Operation and Maintenance The permittee must at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems used for process waste water collection, storage and utilization, and correct any de?ciencies found as soon as possible. Maintaining Compliance if System Fails The permittee must control all applications and discharges upon reduction, loss or failure of the waste storage or utilization facilities until the facilities are restored or an alternative method of storage or utilization is provided. Moisan Dairy AWMP SZ.J. SZ.K. SZ.L. CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 1 of 24 Setback Requirement The permittee must develop a setback for any mechanical application of manure, litter, or process waste water occurring in the land application area(s) adjacent to any surface waters, open tile intake structures, sinkholes, well heads, or other conduits to surface or ground waters where manure, litter, and other process waste waters are prohibited. The setback distances must be included in the permittee?s AWMP. For large concentrated animal feeding operation, this setback must be 100 feet or as a compliance alternative and if demonstrated to the satisfaction of ODA in the AWMP, the permittee for the large concentrated animal feeding operation may: 1. Establish a 35-foot vegetated buffer where manure, litter, and other process waste waters are prohibited; or 2. Demonstrate that a setback or vegetated buffer is not necessary or may be reduced because implementation of alternative conservation practices or ?eld-speci?c conditions will provide pollutant reductions equivalent or better than the reductions that would be achieved by the 100 foot setback. Manure, Litter, or Process Waste Water Transfers 1. The permittee retains responsibility of the manure, litter, or process waste water until the transfer or export is completed with the required documentation. 2. The permittee must maintain manure, litter, or process waste water transfer or export records as required by p. 17. 3. Prior to transferring manure, litter, or process waste water to other persons, the permittee with a large concentrated animal feeding operation must provide the recipient of manure, letter, or process waste water with the a manure nutrient analysis conducted within the previous 12 months. Proper Disposal of Other Wastes Chemicals, contaminants, and other wastes may not be disposed of in any treatment or storage system for contaminated storm water ?'om the production area, manure, litter, or process waste water unless the system is designed to treat such chemicals, contaminants, or wastes and the chemical, contaminants, or other wastes are identi?ed in the AWMP. In addition, chemicals, contaminants, and other wastes may not be disposed of in any system designed for diversion of uncontaminated storm water. Moisan Dairy AWMP S3.A. S3.B. S3.C. CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 12 of 24 S3. ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) Implementation and Compliance 1. Upon registration to this permit, the permittee must implement its current ODA-approved AWMP developed for its CAFO. The permittee?s ODA approved AWMP is incorporated into this permit by reference. The permittee must comply with all terms and conditions of its ODA-approved AWMP. Failure to comply with the ODA- approved AWMP constitutes a violation of the terms and conditions of this permit. Absence of a AWMP or absence of ODA approval of an AWMP does not allow the permittee to violate the provisions of 32 Discharge Limitations and Operating Requirements, p. 9 or other permit requirements. AWMP Submittal and Public Notice 1. 3. The applicant proposing a new CAFO or electing coverage under this permit must submit its AWMP with the ODA ATR to ODA for review and approval according to the schedule provided in .C, p. 6. If necessary to meet the AWMP requirements in this permit, the existing permittee with coverage under the previous version of this general permit must submit a revised or updated AWMP prior to renewing registration under this permit. AWMPs are subject to public notice and participation requirements detailed in condition SLH, p. 7. AWMP Elements 1. The permittee must ensure that its AWMP is adequate for the proposed or existing population of animals, re?ective or the proposed or existing facility operation, and be prepared in accordance with the terms and conditions of this permit, OAR 340-051, and NRCS conservation practice standard guidance 590 for Oregon dated May 2008 entitled Nutrient Management. Note: In the event of any inconsistency between the conditions of this permit and NRCS 590, the conditions of this permit apply. The AWMP may include a schedule for improvement projects. The AWMP must to the extent applicable include the following: Procedures to ensure adequate collection, handling, and storage of contaminated strom water nmo?' from the production area, manure, litter and process waste water in compliance with the requirements of 82. Discharge Limitation and Operating Requirements. Calculations used to determine that storage capacity exists must be provided, including a demonstration the facilities are at least designed and constructed to contain all manure, litter, process waste water, contaminated storm water runoff from the production area, and direct precipitation from a 25 -year, 24-hour rainfall event. Procedures to ensure proper operation and maintenance of the storage facilities; (0) Procedures to ensure proper management of animal mortalities. Animal mortalities may not be disposed of in any storage or treatment system that is not speci?cally designed to treat animal mortalities; Procedures to ensure that clean water is diverted, as appropriate, from the production area; Procedures to prevent direct contact of con?ned animals with surface waters; Identi?cation of appropriate site-speci?c conservation practices to be implemented, including buffers, setback areas, or equivalent practices, to control runoff of pollutants to surface water and groundwater; Protocols to land apply manure, litter or process waste water in accordance with site speci?c nutrient management practices that ensure appropriate agricultural utilization of the nutrients in the manure, litter or process waste water. The protocols must include the following: The NRCS Phosphorous Index, Oregon Agronomy Technical Note #26, revised June 2008, must be completed for all ?elds that receive manure litter or process waste water to determine if nitrogen or phosphorous is the most limiting nutrient. The maximum nutrient Moisan Dairy AWMP S3.D. CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 13 of 24 application rate must be calculated for the most limiting nutrient (from Technical Note #26) and must account for all other nitrogen and phosphorus sources. (ii) Expected crop yields. Calculations showing the total nitrogen and phosphorus to be applied annually to each ?eld, including sources other than manure, litter, or process waste water. (iv) Annual manure application rates and an explanation of the basis for determining these rates. For large concentrated animal feeding operations, these rates must be based on actual test data. For other operations, data or ?book values? ?'om established reference sources Oregon Animal Waste Management program) may be used instead of actual testing. Method(s) used to apply manure, litter, or process waste water. For large concentrated animal feeding operations, protocols for appropriate testing of manure, litter, process waste water, and soil. For other operations, references used instead of actual testing data or test protocols if testing. If applicable, an Agricultural Compost Management Plan as required by OAR 340-096. Frozen soil application procedures if applicatidns of manure, litter, or process waste water will be made to ?ozen soil. At a minimum, the following must be provided: Description of the potential receiving ?eld(s), estimates of waste amounts and types, and estimated timing of applications. (ii) Aerial photo(s) identifying all areas and surface water bodies within 1,000 ft. of the boundaries of the receiving ?eld(s). Soil map(s) identifying soil types for receiving ?eld(s). (iv) Topographic map(s) for receiving ?eld(s). Description of the structural practices in place to ensure that no discharges to surface water occur during application and after the soil thaws. (vi) Description of the method used to determine when soil is ?'ozen and management practices to be followed when planning an application and during and after an application to frozen soil. (vii) Description of monitoring and reporting requirements to ensure that the permittee is in compliance with ?'ozen soil application procedures. Procedures for transfer or export of manure, litter, or process waste water. Identi?cation of speci?c records that will be maintained to document the implementation and management of the minimum elements described above. AWMP Changes 1. Re uirements for small or medium can med animal eedin erations see Table 3 . 15 for an overview Substantial changes. The permittee must submit any proposal to make substantial changes to its AWMP to ODA for approval at least 45 days in advance of the proposed changes. ODA will public notice the proposal as described in .H, p. 7. ODA will notify the permittee of its ?nal decision concerning the proposed changes after the public notice period ends. The permittee may not implement a proposed change until ODA has approved it The following types of changes to an AWMP are considered substantial: A change in the type of manure system including but not limited to switching from a dry to a liquid manure system, switching from a liquid to a dry manure system, or changing the manure system to accommodate an animal species or type of operation not included in the scope of the current AWMP. An increase in maximum allowed animal numbers such that the operation becomes de?ned as a large concentrated animal feeding operation. (ii) Non-substantial changes. Public notice of non-substantial changes (described below) to an AWMP is not required; however, the permittee must submit its proposal to make such a change to ODA for approval at least 45 days in advance of the proposed change unless a different tirneframe is allowed by ODA. ODA will notify the permittee of its ?nal decision concerning the proposed change after reviewing the proposal. The permittee may not implement a proposed change until ODA has approved it. The following changes to an AWMP are considered non-substantial provided they do not result in a substantial modi?cation listed in paragraph above: Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 14 of 24 An increase in animal numbers greater than 10% of the registrant?s maximum allowed animal numbers provided the increase does not change the operation into a large concentrated animal feeding operation. (ii) When facility expansions, production increases, or process modi?cations will result in new or increased generation of waste, litter, or process waste water beyond the scope of the current AWMP. 2. Requirements for medium or large concentrated animal teeding ogerations (see Table 3,9. 15, for an overview): Substantial changes. The permittee must submit any proposal to make substantial changes to its AWMP to ODA for approval at least 60 days in advance of the proposed changes. ODA will public notice the proposal as described in .H, p. 7. ODA will notify the permittee of its ?nal decision concerning the proposed changes after the public notice period ends. The permittee may not implement a proposed change until ODA has approved it. The following types of changes to an AWMP are considered substantial: Addition of new land application areas not previously included in the AWMP, unless the land application area is covered by an existing AWMP that has already been incorporated into an existing NPDES permit and the application of manure, litter, or process waste water on the newly added land application area is in accordance with that existing NPDES permit. (ii) Any changes to the ?eld-speci?c maximum annual rates for land application. Any changes to the maximum amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus derived ?'om all sources for each crop. (iv) Addition of any crop or other uses not included in the AWMP and corresponding ?eld-speci?c rates of application. A change in the type of manure system including but not limited to switching ?'om a dry to a liquid manuresystem, switching from a liquid to a dry manure system, or changing the manure system to accommodate an animal species or type of operation not included in the scope of the current AWMP. (vi) Any changes that are likely to increase the risk of nitrogen and phosphorus transport to surface waters or groundwaters. Non-substantial changes. Public notice of non-substantial changes (described below) to an AWMP is not required; however, the permittee must submit its proposal to make such a change to ODA for approval at least 60 days in advance of the proposed change unless a different timeframe is allowed by ODA. ODA will notify the permittee of its ?nal decision concerning the proposed change after reviewing the proposal. The permittee may not implement a proposed change until ODA has approved it. The following changes to an AWMP are considered non-substantial provided they do not result in a substantial modi?cation listed in paragraph above: An increase in animal numbers greater than 10% of the registrant?s maximum allowed animal numbers. (ii) When facility expansions, production increases, or process modi?cations will result in new or increased generation of waste, litter, or process waste water beyond the scope .of the current AWMP. Moisan Dairy AWMP Table 3: Overview of Requirements for Proposed Changes to AWMPs CAFO NPDES General Permit #01 -2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 15 of 24 SMALL OR MEDIUM CONFINED SMALL, MEDIUM OR LARGE CONCENTRATED Substantial Change Non-Substantial Substantial Change Non-Substantial Change Description of l. A change in the type of The following are considered 1. Addition of new land The following are considered proposed manure system including non-substantial provided application areas not non-substantial provided they change but not limited to they do not result in a previously included in the do not result in a substantial switching from a dry to a substantial change: AWMP, unless the land change: liquid manure system, 1. An increase in animal application area is covered 1, An increase in animal switching from a liquid numbers greater than by an existing AWMP that numbers greater man 10% to a dry manure system, 10% of the registrant?s has already been of me registrant?s or changing the manure maximum allowed incorporated into an maximum allowed animal system to accommodate animal numbers. existing NPDES permit numbers, an animal species or type 2. When facility and the application of 2. When facility expansions, of operation not included production manure, litter, or process production increases, or in the scope of the increases, or process waste water on the newly process modi?cations will current AWMP. modi?cations result added land application result in new or increased 2. An increase in maximum in new or increased area is in accordance with generation of waste, litter, allowed animal numbers generation of waste, that existing NPDES or process waste water such that the operation litter, or process waste permit. beyond the scope of the becomes de?ned as a water beyond the scope 2. Any changes to the ?eld- cum; AWMP. large concentrated of the current AWMP. speci?c maximum annual animal feeding rates for land application. operation. 3. Any changes to the maximum amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus derived from all sources for each crop. 4. Addition of any crop or other uses not included in the AWMP and corresponding ?eld- speci?c rates of application. 5. A change in the type of manure system including but not limited to switching from a dry to a liquid manure system, switching from a liquid to a dry manure system, or changing the manure system to accommodate an animal species or type of operation not included in the scope of the current AWMP. 6. Any changes that are likely to increase the risk of nitrogen and phosphorus transport to surface waters or groundwaters. Timeline to Submit at least 45 days in Submit at least 45 days in Submit at least 60 days in Submit at least 60 days in submit advance of proposed advance of proposed advance of proposed change(s). advance of proposed change(s) proposal to change(s) unless a different unless a different timeframe ODA timeframe allowed by ODA. allowed by ODA. Public notice ODA will public notice as Not required. ODA will public notice as Not required. process described in 31H. p- 7. described in SLH, p. 7. ODA approval ODA will notify the ODA will notify the ODA will notify the permittee ODA will notify the perrnittee permittee of its ?nal decision pennittee of its ?nal decision of its ?nal decision concerning of its ?nal decision concerning concerning the proposed concerning the proposed the proposed change(s) alter the proposed change(s) alter change(s) alter the public change(s) after reviewing the the public notice period ends. reviewing the proposal. notice period ends. proposal. Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 16 of 24 S4. MONITORING, INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING, AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS S4.A. Monitoring Requirements 1. Discharge Monitoring If a discharge to surface water or groundwater occurs that is not allowed by SZ.B or p. 9, the permittee must record the following information: A description and cause of the discharge; The period of discharge including exact dates, times and duration of discharge; An estimate of discharge volume; Name or location of receiving water; and Corrective steps taken, if appropriate, to reduce, eliminate or prevent reoccurrence of the discharge. 2. Anal?ical Monitoring The permittee must conduct the following sampling and analysis according to the following schedule: Large concentrated animal feeding operations only Sample Type Analytical Parameter Minimum Frequency Sample Method Manure, litter, Total nitrogen Annually Sample according to and process (ii) Total phosphorus guidance contained in waste water NRCS 590 or 633 practice standard. Exported Total nitrogen Annually Sample according to manure, litter, (ii) Total phosphorus guidance contained in and process NRCS 590 or 633 waste water practice standard. Soil ?'om land Total nitrogen Once every 5 years from all Sample according to application (ii) Total phosphorus ?elds where manure, litter, or guidance contained in area(s) process waste water is applied. PNW 570-E, EM or NRCS 590 practice standard. Other con?ned animal feeding operations Sample Type Analytical Parameter Minimum Frequency Sample Method Soil from land Total nitrogen Once every 5 years from all Sample according to application (ii) Total phosphorus ?elds where manure, litter, or guidance contained in area(s) process waste water is applied. PNW 570-E, EM 8832-E, or NRCS 590 practice standard. Note: In the event of any inconsistency between the monitoring requirements of this permit and NRCS 590, the monitoring requirements of this permit apply. The permittee should be aware that NRCS 590 monitoring frequencies may need to be followed to access or maintain federal ?mds. Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 17 of 24 S4.B. Inspection Requirements r? l. The permittee must conduct the following inspections: Item Large Concentrated Other Operations Stormwater diversion devices, runoff Weekly and record Periodically diversion structures, animal waste storage results structures, and devices channeling contaminated storm water to the waste water and manure storage and containment structures. Water lines, including drinking water or Daily and record results Periodically cooling water lines. Equipment used for land application of Daily when equipment is Periodically when manure, litter, or process waste water in use and record results equipment is in use Liquid impoundments for manure and Weekly and record depth Periodically process waste water of manure and process waste water according to depth marker required by SZ.E.3, p. 10 2. Any de?ciencies found as a result of these inspections must be corrected as soon as possible. The permittee with a large concentrated animal feeding operation must record any actions taken to correct these de?ciencies and, if de?ciencies are not corrected within 30 days, provide an explanation of the factors preventing immediate correction. S4.C. Recordkeeping and Availability Requirements 1. The permittee must maintain all information required by this permit at the facility for at least ?ve (5) years A and make this information available to ODA upon request. 2. Upon obtaining permit coverage, must record the following information. (Note: If any of the following information is provided in the permittee?s AWMP, a separate record keeping effort is not required.) Item Large Concentrated Other Operations Date, amount, and nutrient loading of Required Required manure, litter, or process waste water applied to each ?eld. Weather conditions at the time of Required Not required application and 24 hours before and a?er application. Total amount of nitrogen and phosphorus Required Required actually applied annually to each ?eld, including documentation of calculations of the total amount applied. Total amount of manure or waste water Required. Also include: Required transferred or exported to other persons. Date and amount of each transfer or export (ii) Name and address of each recipient Copy of the manure nutrient analysis conducted provided to the recipient [see SZ.K.3, p. 11 A Description of actions taken to correct Required (see 8432, p. Not required de?ciencies discovered during inspections. 17) Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 18 of 24 S4.D. Reporting Requirements 1. 24-hour Reporting If a discharge to surface water or groundwater occurs that is not allowed by Condition SZ.B and 82C, p. 9, the permittee must notify ODA within 24 hours of the discharge. The permittee must submit a written report within ?ve (5) days to ODA. The information to be submitted is listed in the monitoring requirements (see S4.A, p. 16 above) of this permit. . The permittee must report to ODA within 24 hours of becoming aware of any signi?cant physical failure at any time of a waste water control facility required under this permit. (0) The permittee must notify ODA within 24 hours of any permit noncompliance that may endanger health or the environment as described in 62.6, p. 20. 2. Annual Report The permittee must submit an annual report to ODA by March 15 of each year. The annual report must include the following for the previous calendar year: Maximum number and type of animals approved by ODA in the permittee?s Notice of Registration, whether in open con?nement or housed under roof beef cattle, broilers, layers, swine weighing 55 pounds or more, swine weighing less than 55 pounds, mature dairy cows, dairy heifers, veal calves, sheep and lambs, horses, ducks, turkeys, other). (ii) Actual number of animals by type at the CAFO averaged over the year. Estimated amount of total manure, litter, process waste water and other material that comes into contact with manure generated by the CAFO (tons, gallons, cubic feet, or cubic yards). (iv) Estimated amount of total manure, litter, process waste water and other material transferred to other persons by the permittee (tons, gallons, cubic feet, or cubic yards). Estimated amount of manure, bedding, litter, process waste water, and other material that comes in contact with manure applied to land by the permittee (tons, gallons, cubic feet, or cubic yards). (vi) Total number of acres for land application covered by the AWMP developed in accordance with the terms of this permit. (vii) Total number of acres under control of the permittee that were used for land application of manure, litter and process waste water. Summary of all manure, litter and process waste water discharges from the production area that have occurred, including date, time and approximate volume. (ix) A statement indicating whether the AWMP was developed or approved by a certi?ed waste management planner. As required by 40 CFR the concentrated animal feeding operation that discharges or proposes to discharge to waters of the US. must also report the following: (1) Actual crop(s) planted and actual yield(s) for each ?eld. (2) Actual nitrogen and phosphorus content of the manure, litter, and process waste water. (3) Data used and results of calculations based on protocol in the ODA-approved AWMP. (4) Amount of manure litter, and process waste water applied to each ?eld during the previous 12 months. (5) Results of soil testing for nitrogen and phosphorus if testing was performed. (6) Amount of any supplemental fertilizer applied. The armual report must be signed and certi?ed by the permittee or permittee?s authorized representative with the following statement: certi?; under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direct supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are signi?cant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of ?nes and imprisonment for knowing violations.? Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 19 of 24 S4.E. Additional Monitoring 1. ODA may establish speci?c monitoring requirements in addition to those contained in this permit by administrative order. An administrative order is an agency action expressed in writing directed to a named person or named persons (ORS 183.310). 2. If a permittee experiences two or more discharges within a 24-month period that are not associated with a 25- year, 24-hour or greater rainfall event, ODA may require surface water and/or groundwater quality monitoring or transfer the permittee to an individual permit. Monitoring for the following parameters may be required: bacteria, total suspended solids, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, biochemical oxygen demand, and other nutrient indicators. If ODA waives the additional monitoring requirements because such monitoring would be impracticable or not likely to produce use?rl information, ODA will set out the basis for the decision in writing and make the decision available to interested parties. Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 20 of 24 GENERAL CONDITIONS Gl. Noncomplianee reporting requirements 1. If for any reason, the permittee does not comply with, or will be unable to comply with any of the requirements or conditions speci?ed in the permit, the permittee must, at a minimum, provide ODA with the following information: A description of the nature and cause of noncompliance, including the quantity and quality of any unauthorized waste discharges; The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, and the anticipated time when the permittee will return to compliance; and The steps taken, or to be taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the noncompliance. 2. In addition, the permittee must take immediate action to stop, contain, and clean up any unauthorized discharges and take all reasonable steps to minimize any adverse impacts to waters of the state and correct the problem. The permittee must notify ODA by telephone so that an investigation may be made to evaluate any resulting impacts and the corrective actions taken to determine if additional action should be taken. 3. Compliance with these requirements does not relieve the permittee from responsibility to maintain continuous compliance with the conditions of this permit or resulting liability for failure to comply GZ. Additional reporting requirements [40 CFR 1. Planned changes. The permittee shall give notice to the director as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required only when: The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for determining whether a facility is a new source in or The alteration or addition could signi?cantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged. This noti?cation applies to pollutants which are subject neither to effluent limitations in the permit, nor to noti?cation requirements under The alteration or addition results in a signi?cant change in the permittee?s sludge use or disposal practices, and such alteration, addition, or change may justify the application of permit conditions that are different from or absent A in the existing permit, including noti?cation of additional use or disposal sites not reported during the permit application process or not reported pursuant to an approved land application plan; . 2. Anticipated noncompliance. The permittee shall give advance notice to the director of any planned changes the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. 3. Transfers. This permit is not transferable to any person except a?er notice to the director. The director may require modi?cation or revocation and reissuance of the permit to change the name of the permittee and incorporate such other requirements as may be necessary under the Clean Water Act (See ?122.61; in some cases, modi?cation or revocation and reissuance is mandatory.) 4. Monitoring reports. Monitoring results must be reported at the intervals speci?ed elsewhere in this permit. Monitoring results must be reported on a Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) or forms provided or speci?ed by the director for reporting results of monitoring of sludge use or disposal practices. If the permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by the permit using test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136, or another method required for an industry-speci?c waste stream under 40 CFR subchapters or O, the results of such monitoring must be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the CMR or sludge reporting form speci?ed by the director. Calculations for all limitations which require averaging of measurements must utilize an arithmetic mean unless otherwise speci?ed by the director in the permit. 5. Compliance schedules. Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on, interim and ?nal requirements contained in any compliance schedule of this permit must be submitted no later than 14 days following each schedule date. 6. Twentyfour hour reporting. The permittee shall report any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment. Any information must be provided orally within 24 hours ?om the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. A written submission must also be provided within 5 days of the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission must contain a description of the noncompliance and its cause; the period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been A Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 21 of 24 corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. The following must be included as information which must be reported within 24 hours under this paragraph. Any unanticipated bypass which exceeds any ef?uent limitation in the permit. (See ?122.4l(g) or condition 616, p. 23.) (ii) Any upset which exceeds any e?luent limitation in the permit. (See ?122.4l(n) or condition 617, p. 24.) Violation of a maximum daily discharge limitation for any of the pollutants listed by the director in the permit to be reported within 24 hours. (See The director may waive the written report on a case-by-case basis for reports under paragraph 62.6(b) of this section if the oral report has been received within 24 hours. 7. Other noncompliance. The permittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under paragraphs 62.4, 5, and 6 of this section, at the time monitoring reports are submitted. The reports must contain the information listed in paragraph 62.6 of this section. 8. Other information. Where the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or in any report to the director, it shall submit such facts or information. G3. Duty to comply [40 CFR The permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of a permit renewal application. 1. The permittee shall comply with ef?uent standards or prohibitions established under section 307(a) of the Clean Water Act for toxic pollutants and with standards for sewage sludge use or disposal established under section 405(d) of the CWA within the time provided in the regulations that establish these standards or prohibitions or standards for sewage sludge use or disposal, even if the permit has not yet been modi?ed to incorporate the requirement. 2. The Clean Water Act provides that any person who violates section 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318 or 405 of the Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing any such sections in a permit issued under section 402, or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under sections 402(a)(3) or 402(b)(8) of the Act, is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $25,000 per day for each violation. The Clean Water Act provides that any person who negligently violates sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act, or any condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of the Act, or any requirement imposed in a pretreaunent program approved under section 402(a)(3) or 402(b)(8) of the Act, is subject to criminal penalties of $2,500 to $25,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment of not more than 1 year, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a negligent violation, a person shall be subject to criminal penalties of not more than $50,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 2 years, or both. Any person who knowingly violates such sections, or such conditions or limitations is subject to criminal penalties of $5,000 to $50,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment for not more than 3 years, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knowing violation, a person shall be subject to criminal penalties of not more than $100,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment of not more than 6 years, or both. Any person who knowingly violates section 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 308, 318 or 405 of the Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of the Act, and who knows at that time that he thereby p1aces another person in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury, shall, upon conviction, be subject to a ?ne of not more than $250,000 or imprisonment of not more than 15 years, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knowing endangerment violation, a person shall be subject to a ?ne of not more than $500,000 or by imprisonment of not more than 30 years, or both. An organization, as de?ned in section of the CWA, shall, upon conviction of violating the imminent danger provision, be subject to a ?ne of not more than $1,000,000 and can be ?ned up to $2,000,000 for second or subsequent convictions. 3. Any person may be assessed an administrative penalty by the Administrator for violating section 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318 or 405 of this Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of this Act. Administrative penalties for Class I violations are not to exceed $10,000 per violation, with the maximum amount of any Class I penalty assessed not to exceed $25,000. Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01 -2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 22 of 24 Penalties for Class II violations are not to exceed $10,000 per day for each day during which the violation continues, with the maximum amount of any Class II penalty not to exceed $125,000. G4. Compliance with other laws and statutes Nothing in the permit will be construed as excusing the permittee ?om compliance with any applicable federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, or regulations. G5. Property rights [40 CFR This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privilege. G6. Duty to reapply If the permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit a?er the expiration date of this permit, the permittee must apply for a new permit or renewal permit. The application must be submitted at least 180 days before the expiration date of this permit. The director may grant permission in writing to submit an application less than 180 days in advance but no later than the permit expiration date. G7. Need to halt or reduce activity not a defense [40 CFR It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. G8. Duty to mitigate [40 CFR The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge or sludge use or disposal in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely a?'ecting human health or the environment. G9. Proper operation and maintenance [40 CFR The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This A provision requires the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are installed by a permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit. G10. Permit actions 1. This permit may be modi?ed, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The ?ling of a request by the permittee for a permit modi?cation, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or a noti?cation of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition. [40 CFR 2. After notice, registration under this permit may be modi?ed or revoked as it applies to any person for cause as follows: Violation of any terms or conditions of the permit, Failure of the permittee to disclose fully all relevant facts, or misrepresentations of any relevant facts by the permittee during the permit issuance process and during the life of the permit; Failure to pay permit fees required by Oregon Administrative Rule when due; Information indicating that the permitted operation poses a threat to human health or welfare; A change in ownership or control of the operation, or (1) Other causes listed in 40 CFR ?122.62 and 122.63. Modi?cation or revocation of coverage under this permit as it applies to any person may be initiated by ODA. 4. Issuance of coverage under an individual permit may be initiated by ODA in accordance with condition 81 .F Individual Permit Coverage, p. 7. 5" G1 1. Change of Ownership or Control The permittee must notify ODA in writing thirty (30) days prior to a change in facility ownership or control. G12. Duty to provide information [40 CFR The permittee shall furnish to the director, within a reasonable time, any information which the director may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit or to determine Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01 -2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 23 of 24 compliance with this permit. The permittee shall also furnish to the director upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this permit. G13. Inspection and entry [40 CFR The permittee shall allow the director, or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor acting as a representative of the Administrator), upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to: 1. 2. 3. 4. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit; Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit; Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act or state law, any substances or parameters at any location. G14. Monitoring and records [40 1. 2. Samples and measurements taken for the purpose of monitoring must be representative of the monitored activity. Except for records of monitoring information required by this permit related to the permittee's sewage sludge use and disposal activities, which must be retained for a period of at least ?ve years (or longer as required by 40 CF part 503), the permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the application for this permit, for a period of at least 3 years ?om the date of the sample, measurement, report or application. This period may be extended by request of the director at any time. Records of monitoring information must include: The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements; The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements; The date(s) analyses were performed; The individual(s) who performed the analyses; The analytical techniques or methods used; and The results of such analyses. Monitoring must be conducted according to test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136 unless another method is required under 40 CFR subchapters or O. The Clean Water Act provides that any person who falsi?es, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this permit shall, upon conviction, be punished by a ?ne of not more than $10,000, or by imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or both. If a conviction of a person is for a violation committed after a first conviction of such person under this paragraph, punishment is a ?ne of not more than $20,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 4 years, or both. G15. Signatory requirement [40 CFR l. 2. All applications, reports, or information submitted to the director shall be signed and certi?ed. (See ?122.22) The CWA provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certi?cation in any record or other document submitted or required to be maintained under this permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or non-compliance shall, upon conviction, be punished by a ?ne of not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 6 months per violation, or by both. G16. Bypass [40 CFR 1. Definitions. Bypass means the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility. Severe property damage means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities which causes them to become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by delays in production. Moisan Dairy AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 . Page 24 of 24 2. Bypass not exceeding limitations. The permittee may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause ef?uent limitations to be exceeded, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of paragraphs 617.3 and 4 of this section. 3. Notice Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice, if possible at least ten days before the date of the bypass. Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required in paragraph 62.6 of this section (24-hour notice). 4. Prohibition of bypass. Bypass is prohibited, and the director may take enforcement action against a permittee for bypass, unless: Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage; (ii) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satis?ed if adequate back-up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and The permittee submitted notices as required under paragraph 616.3 of this section. The director may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if the director determines that it will meet the three conditions listed above in Gl6.4(a) of this section. G17. Upset [40 CFR 1. Definition. Upset means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with technology based permit ef?uent limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation. 2. E?ect of an upset. An upset constitutes an af?rmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with such technology based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of paragraph 617.3 of this section are met. No determination made during administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is ?nal administrative action subject to judicial review. 3. Conditions necessaiy for a demonstration of upset. A permittee who wishes to establish the af?rmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: The upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset; The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated; and The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required in paragraph of this section (24 hour notice). The permittee complied with any remedial measures required under paragraph G8 of this section. 4. Burden of proof In any enforcement proceeding the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof. Moisan Dairy AWMP Section 5 REFERENCES PUBLICATIONS AND SOFTWARE Crop Fertilizer Recommendations Nutrient Requirements for Dairy Cattle 7th Ed, 2001 Natl. Research Council http:/Mww. nap. edu/openbook.php ?isbn=0309069971 OSU EM8978-E, June 2009 of Cascades); PNW615, 2010 of Cascades) Extension Service Publications Field Corn, Eastern Oregon-East of the Cascades, F6 71, January 2000 Nitrogen Uptake and Utilization by Paci?c Northwest Crops, PNW 513, December 1999 oregonstate. edu/XquVbitstream/handle? 957/20719/pnw513.pdf Manure Application Rates for Forage Production, OSU EM 8585-E, July 2007 Monitoring Soil Nutrients Using a Management Unit Approach, PNW 570-E, October 2003, Post-Harvest Soil Nitrate Testing for Manured Croppings Systems, EM 8832-E, May 2003, Silage Corn, Western Oregon, EM 8978-E, June 2009 Soil Test Interpretation Guide, OSU EC 1478, August 1999 Feed Management Feed Management. A tool for balancing nutrients on dairies and other livestock operations, EM 8913-E, July 2006 Manure Application Setback Features/Distances CAFO General Permit #1 Manure Nutrient Availability Waste Utilization Jobsheet 633 OR-JS. Oregon USDA-NRCS, May 2003 Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 5-27 Section 5 REFERENCES Phosphorus Assessment Agronomy Technical Note No. 26: The Phosphorus Index, Oregon NRCS, June 2008 Agricultural Phosphorus Management Using the Oregon/Washington Phosphorus Indexes Practice Standards Oregon NRCS Nutrient Management Standard (590), May 2008 http://efotg. nrcs. usda. doc Record Keeping Online Decision making And Record Keeping, March 2014 Oregon ODA CAFO Recordkeeping Calendar, January 2015 Water Quality/Quantity Oregon NRCS Water Quality Technical Note No. 1: Water Quality Indicator Tools, October 2000, Software Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, RUSLE2 version 1.26.6.4, October 2006 Oregon Animal Waste Management Planning Tool, June 2014 Online Decision making And Record Keeping, January 2015 http://t/vww. odark. org Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 5-28 ORAWM WORKBOOK CLIENT: BY: Moisnn Dairy REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) Bruce D. ??ilmn. Hid! Engineering LLC ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INVENTORY ANIMAL INVENTORY [Hoistan i MILXER (DRY) HEIFERS (12-24 Months) CALVES (1-12 Months} Number of Animals 940 160 400 400 GRAZING PERIOD ILKIZR (I Iolsmin) MILKLR (DRY) HEIFERS (12?2-1 Months) (1-12 anhs) Moisan Dairy AWMP Aver-g:- Weight I SUI) 45!] ion 5.0 II). Animal 0.12 0.04 0.05 U. Production 867.62 HUJI 67.20 9.4I 85.12 4 56 75.6U 9.72 of ?math and Number ofAnimlls 940 (IV. I Page 1 of3 Page 5-15% 400 Manure CFIDIA L74 0 U. 1. 3.1419015 Days Days Grand Farm Molsan Dalry Section 5 ASSISTED BY: REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) Version 5.0 Moisan Dairy Bruce D. Wilson. Engineering 1.1.1? ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEIVIENT SYSTEM INVENTORY WEATHER STATION SALEM wso AIRPORT AREAS CONTRIBUTING RUNOF T0 LIQUID STORAGE FACILITY 4,00 Runon' Fac?nrg as Description 01' Area in SF 95.00 a Percenl ol' \1 0mm Pa ved Lot Area 113,249 ANNIE Precipitation 15 paved Int 501'!!de daily? N0 Month Pmdm?m humming paved Unpavm mung] Lot Area Otto her 3.03 1.65 511% 17% Roof Area 0 Novemhcr 6.39 0.73 55% 22% Surface Area of Silage Storage 16 441 December 6.46 0.42 55% 20% Does Silage Scepage Drain to Storage Facility? (WM1 V55 Jeni-erg 6.02 0.46 55% 22% Total Runoff Area Contributing to Liquid Slorege 1 18.249 Februnrv 5.09 0.78 45% 20% March 4.17 1.52 44% 15% WATER USE THAT ENTERS LIQUID STORAGE. FACILITY April 2.76 2.31 40% 12% I I "Mb" 0' Gallons of fatal Water 10:31 Wale: M'y 2? 3'61 36% Number of ??85th Water L'sed Use per Day. Use per Day. June 1.45 4.18 30% 10% Type of Water Use Animals Day per Wash?Day Gallons Cubic Feet til 0.57 5.22 30 0% A nimel Wu sh walee 9-10 0 0.00 0 0.0 August 0.68 4.76 35% 10% meul Wash 3 150.00 450 60.2 September 1.43 3.25 45% 15% Flushwuler 0 0.00 0 0.0 Annual 40.18 28.89 Miscellaneous 3 1000.00 3000 401.1 34 5 46] 2 CROP DATA Percent Nutrients Rcmm'cd in Pounds per Acre Matter Nitrogen Phosphorous Pomssium Field Number Acres Crop (DM) Yield Units Target Yield P205 K20 A 15.7 Perennial Hay/PasturerMed Intensity} 85% Ton 6.291.9 Com 503991010 I 30% Ton 30.00 225 112 21? II. M. ll. 152.3 Alfalfa Hay 115% 5.00 272 78 215 i. 99.0 Filbem A 100% Ton 1.50 63 25 7| Com Cover Crop 29L9 Ryegm? Haylagl 30Farm Total Aeres- 850.8 I Page 2 of 3 Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 5-30 31412015 Moiuan Dairy ORAWMV5.D.XIB Section 5 ,1 REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) 3?4?2015 Verslon 5.0 Moisau Dairy ASSISTED BY: Bruce D. Wilson. [um Engineering Lu: I ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INVENTORY BEDDING VOLUME Amount Total Total Unit Wcighl Nucdcd Volume Volume Weigh! 'l'vpc of Animal ?i'ypc of?cdding Facility Bedding Mutcriul Lbstaw'AU l?lDuy/AU Cl?lDay Lbsr?lJav (Holstein) 5?3? MILKER (DRY) 5?3? 2.50 4.50 0.75 168 1.003 HEIFFRS l2-2d Months) ?3?53 ?W'st CALVES 1-12 Months) Con?ned Loose Straw 150 9.30 0.75 135 1.674 7 SOLIDS SEPARATION FACTOR Volume of Volume of Volume of Volume of Accumulated Density of Weight of Solids Solids in Manure in Manum in Sludge in Scpumtul Separated Solids Sepanncd Liquids Liquids Solids Storage Solids Solids of Animal Type of Semramr Separated CFfDay CFi'Day CFfDav FlDav thJ'Day MILKER iols?icin) Static Inclined ScreerIISide Hill Sepaf?t?d 22 ?51: 461$ L658 .658 463 957 36 16.840 7510.100 (12~24 Months) 5131?: main? Sifter-{Side Hi? Separator2.281 Months) my 59910.157 1! v. Tum] 1.094 2.071 [.995 867 [1336 39.379 Page 3 of 3 Molsan Dairy Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 5-31 Section 5 Section 5 REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) 3?4?2015 Varslun 5.0 Maisnn Dairy ASSISTED HY: Bruce I). Wllson. Englneering LLC ANLMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRODUCTION VOLUMES Paved Unpaved Silage Pil Roof Area Slab Area L01 Area Sin-race Facility Manure 'l?mal Square Feet Square Feet Square Feet Area. SF Water Use Solids Solids in Solids Total 1. 0 0 Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Pounds Cubic Feet Pounds Cubic Feet Pounds Feet 31-12 33 . I 738 6419 I 11 33.909 11 184 14 11.312 113142 33 91 1.220 738 64192 310911 33.909 1158-I42 1.195 990 61.75 80 460 I 157410 59.76 83142 3 1195 990 61755 142 a 460 1157.410 59 763 2.151451 Annual 1.19.651 25.527 Annual 3300 COD DAILY NUTRIENT PRODUCTION ol?Nmriems from Pounds/Day oi?Nuirienls from PoundyDay ot?Nuirienis from Grazing Confined LIQUIDS SOLIDS Manure Manure Type of Animal P205 K20 P205 K20 1?:th K20 (inlIonsN Cubic Fm.in (Holstein) 118.87 21.90 1-11.53 72.80 31.9] 52 82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 776.092 MILKER (DRY) 2.95 0.44 2.54 19.22 6.81 10.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 75.219 (12-24 Momhs) 11.66 2.12 13.60 7.14 3.09 5.08 85.12 33.36 46.27 154.890 84.413 CALVES [1-12 Months) 3.32 0.45 2.25 21 63 7.03 8 92 0.00 0 00 0,00 0 88.038 1) 00 0.00 0.111) 0 011 0.110 1100 0.110 (I 00 11.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0110 11.01) 0.110 11011 0.110 00 0.110 (100 0.1111 0 1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01.1 0.00 0 0 Total- 154.390 1.023.152 Page I of 2 Moisan Dairy Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 5-32 Section 5 REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) 3?4?2015 Version 5.0 CLIENT: Molsan Dairy ASSISTED BY: Bruce D. Wilson. I.I.C ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRODUCTION MONTH LY UTRIENT PRODUCTION Pounds of Nutrients from Pounds of Nutrients from Pounds of Nutrients from Tom! Pounds of Nutrian from LIQUIDS SOLIDS GRAZING ALI. SOURCES Month P205 K20 P105 K20 P205 K20 P105 K20 October 4.1 I4 749 4.810 3.667 L480 2.329 924 362 502 8.705 2.592 7.64I Nmember 4.069 741 4.757 3.602 I .456 2.292 2 55 100 I 39 7.927 2.297 7.188 December 4.241 772 4 .958 3.744 I .5 14 2.384 0 0 7.985 2.286 7.342 JanuaryI 4.24 I 772 4.958 3.744 I .5 I4 2.384 0 0 7.985 2.286 7.342 February 3.330 098 4.478 3.382 |.367 2.!54 0 0 2.065 6.63I March 4.24] 772 4.958 3.744 l.514 2.384 0 0 7.985 2.286 7.342 April 4.052 738 4.736 3.592 l.45I 2.285 383 I50 208 8.026 2.3 39 7.229 May 4.1 [4 749 4.810 3.667 L480 2.329 924 362 502 8.705 2.592 7.64l June 3.982 725 4.655 3.549 L433 2.254 894 350 486 8 .424 2.503 7.395 July 4.1 I4 749 4.810 3.667 1.480 2.329 924 362 502 8.705 2.5 92 7.6-1] Aggust I4 749 4.810 3.667 I480 2.329 924 362 502 8.705 2.592 7.64 I September - 3.932 725 4.655 3.549 L433 2.254 394 350 486 8.424 2.508 7.395 Annual . 49.093 8.94] 57.393 43.575 17.604 27.708 6.120 2.398 3.327 98.788 28.943 88.428 Page 2 01'2 Molsan Dalry Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 5-33 Section 5 REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) 3?4?2015 Version 5.0 Moisan Dairy 1-.1) BY: Bruce I). Wilson, ll&R Engineering ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM STORAGE SOLIDS SOLIDS IN Solids Solids Normal Number Manure Bedding to Store to Store Runo?' Solids Sloragc Facility Parameters Value Monlh ofDays (51" C17 om: Smraee Period, Day5= 134 October 31 26.17? 7,045 16,6l 1 593 1,041 Stacking Width. in Fccl= 0 November 30 25,1108 6.818 16.3l3 58? 2.840 Stacking Height, in Fou= 0.01] December 3] 26,865 7,045 16 955 610 2,610 Wall Height. in Feet: 0.00 Januarv 213.865 7.045 ?3.955 610 2.676 Slack Side: Slope 0.00 l-?cbruary 28 24,265 (L363 15,314 551 2,057 Existing Storage. Cubic Feer [20.928 March 31 26,865 1045 16955 610 1,264 Surfacc Area of Existing Sloragc? SF: 24.245 April 30 25.713 6.318 16.265 586 669 25 ?rat?24 Hour Runoff. 6.930 May 31 26.17? 1045 16.611 598 430 Volume Needed. Cuhic Feet: ?11.56! June 30 25.333 6.81 8 16.075 579 293 Design Volume. Cu bic1"cc1= (I July 31 26,177 7.045 16,61 1 593 (I Is Facility Covered? NO 1' August 31 26.17? 7.045 16.61 1 598 137 Vulumc Ruduclion Fun:qu 0.50 30 25.333 (1.818 16,075 579 433 Annual 365 311.754 82.946 197.350 7, 05 14,451 i Width,W=| 0 Feet Storage Pernod=l 134 Days Volume of Solids to Store =l 101561 Cubic l-?ccl 1 Stack Height, 1-1 0 Feet Length, 0 Feet -- Moisan Dairy Moisanx Dairy AWMP Page 5-34 1 Section 5 REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) 3?4?2015 Version 6.0 CLIENT: Moisan Dairy ASSISTED BY: Bruce D. Wilma. Enulncerinl LLC ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM STORAGE STORAGE POND MIDWS INTO STORAGE POND Rain-map Ruin-Bran Normal Wasto Waste Number on Pond on Existing. Runoff Washwmer Solids to Store to Stone Pond Parameters Value Mb ol'Dayu CF Stow. CF CF (11? CF CF Gallons Dm= 365 October 3| 0 47.5 I 0 19.588 14298 61,755 202,557 1.515.229 Side Slope I 2.50 November 30 0 194.860 42,169 13.83? 61,447 37l,487 2,778,919 Width. KW. Feet= 0 December 3| 0 207.942 42.304 14,298 64,] 92 390.580 2.921.743 mummy. 1-?oc1= 11 January 31 11 191.417 40.029 14.2911 64.l92 371.780 2.731.109 Accumulated Solids Bullion. quF 1 PM 28 0 148.383 28,650 I 2,914 57.980 303.786 2.272.477 t-?ocl- 31.6" M41511 3] 0 91,233 23.!13 [4.298 64.192 254.680 1.905.138 Suits: Area ofExiating Stung, "3.130 April 30 0 15.492 14.772 H.837 61.110 164,049 1.227.175 Minimum Soil Linc: 1h. t?oct- 1.00 Mar 3] 0 60,953 8278 [4.293 61.755 92,735 694,078 25 Year-24 Hour Storm Runo??. 40,729 1113 30 0 -93.987 4,778 13,837 59,763 41.88] 3| 3.288 'l'op Width. TW, liocl- 0 July 3] 0 460,083 [.685 14.298 61.755 42.944 471,631 Top Length, TL. Feet= 0 Angus: 3| 0 440.464 2,576 14.298 61.755 4,429 48,172 Volume Needed, Acre l?ect- 64.63 80:11ch 30 0 62.653 9.838 13.837 59.763 78,270 585,500 Design Volume, 59o Feet= 0.00 Annual 365 0 388.686 237.781 168.349 739,657 1.534.474 11478.66] a Top Width, - I 0 Feet a .. - Crest Spillway Minimum l-?rccboard - Foot . a . . . 1:174. 3 . . . .. 1.31:1. e111..l:v Ill 1 De -- [68348 "1;;11121. . .. "?lling. u; Maison Dairy ORAWMVEJJIS Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 5-35 Section 5 REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) 3?4?3015 5.0 310mm Dairy ASSISTED 131': Bruce D. Wilson. Euthanan ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UTILIZATION ENTS AVAILABLE AFTER STORAGE . Type of! \peralian Pounds of Nunicnu Retain-2d Pound: ?(Mariam Km Nutriom Availnb 3mm Rat-mad A?a aw Sou?: Fncilily . I ,3 )4 9.03 no 132m Kz? has no Pond Mm WM 493393 8.9-1] 57.393 65% 959. 95% 31.91 1 5.494 34.524 Solldsi 43.57 5 17.604 23.103 75% 90% 90% 32.68! I 5.343 34.937 cram I I 6.120 1393 mm 10W. now. 6.12? 2.393 3.32-- RETRIENTS AFTER APPLICATION Fund: of Penmrl Nm?mn Retained - Pom-3d: of Nun'an: Nathan Nutrients Available A?cr Appl'mtim Relu'mcd Ana Anzlmium Saul? Tune of App?mg?mm P205 K20 P305 3:20 P203 K20 31.91 I 8.494 54.524 75% 100% 100% 23.933 8.49-1 54.524 32.68 I H.843 2-1937 10% 100% 100% 22.87 7 15.843 2-1337 6.120 2.398 3.327 100% 100% 5.20: 2.393 3.32? u- Wd? {Immalnl fur mom My; 4ller Mali-XI] . . . IDDI AVAIIABLE AFTER DENITRIFICATION Lamtiml Pounds of Pd:th .?I'umcnn Pound: omenEnu Nutnm! and 0m Mom!? IN utn'enrs Available .a ?u Dmitrirmlinn Retained Ana Dauurirwm Some Soil Dam Clan P205 no no: no P305 K20 um: 23.933 3.494 54.524 30% 100% 100% I93 .15 8.494 54.524 Bonds Saw? ?Mr Wm] 22.87? 15.343 24.93? say. 100% mass "3.3m 15.343 24,937 amino 50mm Poorlvm-imd 2.393 3.327 say. 100% mm 4.152 2.393 3.327 r0324]: 41.810 26.736 82.788 Page 1 of 2 Multan Dalty Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 5-36 REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) Verslon 5.0 (31231: Molsan Dairy ASSISTED Bruce D. ?11ml. IliR Englneering LLC ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UTILIZATION PERCENT OF TO BE APPLIED T0 FIELD AND UTILIZATION ACRES NEEDED BASED ON lmmocm. 3143015 LIQUIDS SOLIDS GRAZING Pounds of Nut?entu to be to be to be Crap Applied Applied o! Nulnents Applied Acres Percent Needed {or Pm: Field Numbot Pounds of Nutrients to be Applied Acres Needed for Utilization of Nutnents Fervent to be Applled Pounds of Nutmnta to be Applied Actes Needed for Utilization of Nutrients A I5 7 I??cnuiul IIayI'anmclel lnlemitvl 0% 0 (I 0% 1041?. 4.162 16 B. C, D. Ii. 0 291.9 Com. Silug?tAIlI 96% 18.181 32 80% H.641 I513 Alfalfa Hav 0% I) 20% 3,660 0% 0 LI I. 99:: 0% Filbert: 4% I I 0% Cum Con-r Crop 291 .TOTALS- 100% 19.146 93 100% 18.301 4.162 16 NUTRIENT BALANCE BASED ON AVAILABLE ACRES NUTRJENTS APPLIED - NITRIENTS REMOVED NUTRIENT BALANCE Nitrogen. m. Potassium. P205 K20 Acre: Cl'gp LbalAcre LstAcre Nitrogen. LWACIE hm thlAnre Potassium. x20 LbalAcre Nitmnm. LstAGre We?, P205 LbsIAcre Potasaum. K20 I 5 Pemml Hav Palm!? Med Iruemilvl 265 153 212 265 39 253 6-1 41 291.9 Cum, 113 TI :48 225 82 -ill -II 31 I513 272 99.0 FIIberl: 7 3 :0 63 25 -55 -51 Com Cm'ct Crop 29] .9 qunm iiavlnge I 1?3 63 473 .171 u??I-?srm Page 2 all Moisan Dairy AWMP Page 5-37 Malsan Dalry Section 5 Section 5 REFERENCES Mois?airy AWMP Page 5-38