Commission
Trade Policy Committee
TTIP — P fiblic Procurement

 9%:

a? yh C

 

 

will find attached a nbte by the

‘ : ja

n classified  EU/EU RESTRICTED
  ' sts of the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

2 July 20]
Withoutprejudice

  
     
  
 

 



‘ UROPEAN COMMISSION

Directorate—General for  e

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OBJ  CTIVE: F or information and discWan

      

 

1
RESTREIN T UE

   

 

 

     

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RESTREINT UE

 

 

 

%

‚k

 

„

  
   

 

S:
Member States (DS 1
comments expressed N
content will be provided at the informal t
sub: this document t0 the US before or

    

 

o;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

   

   

 

2
RESTREIN T UE

   

 

The enclosed text revise  fvvo previous documents submitte .
1”/l4 and DS 1235/14). The reviseds-ägää
. ‚ä
‚wäome Member States. An Opportunä?

  
    

 

   

   

 

  
 
  
  

Rio the
ext takes into account the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ß

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ‚ r"

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

EU—Ü . 2 July 2014

IP Negatiationg
 Without prejudice

 
 

 

       

 
  

N *DELIVERABLES IN AN INIT   OFFER CONCERNING 
V NTRAL LEVEL N PUBLIC PRÖCUREMENT (IN PARTICULÄfi

‘9.

 

       
  
    

   
 
 

ISSUES RELATED T0 ANNE )

       

 the High Level Working
mm of TTIP 1n the area of government procukrement
improved access to?’ vemment procurement opp f  niti

N . asis of natio

   
 

 

 
     

 

In this context sub  tially improved access
at sgäcentral level in the US guar ;‚f_j_:_‚jjteed
to  tates and relevant sub-centgw
which account for Egproximately 60% o
critical component  overall ’
und Egtands that präparations of .
tak "

 ure ent oppo

     

rtunities

   
      
   
   

roc sseßment, is a particularly
‚  ackage. While the EU
ov ring the sub—centraL _vel will

 

      
   
   
  
 
  
 

 
   
 

gp-application o o

 t requirements t0 EU good W
supäärs and se

. R should convey the mes f’ 

   

 Eother sub—central level
 “äods services, suppliers and  providers, the EU

- significangfi‘gmprovements in access for '
service  rs. In that context it shoul
 manufactured in accord Ece with equally high
 ent and labour protection ° hat the EU is ready t0
.  . . . . . 3?? . .
1procal baSIS not t0 scr1m1nate VIS a-VIS US good

     

 

H \„

     

  



 _me the process of consul '_ on with the States'
ments and   entities, this 5aper sets out without
ce t0 other requests that   e submitted at a later sta i o—‚ below
 ain elementsmwpf EU expectäffions for US geliverables in an offer

ntral level on public procurfäfgent. The EU reiterates

concerning the suba’i ‘
that it accepts, as iäaä‘t‘ggested by the US, that the  ference for State level
'  tiath revised GPA text.

  

  
  



com 'tments Will be the recently n 

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

MAIN ELEMENTS  EXPECTA'E‘IÖNS FOR «

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

2July 2014 7
Without prejudice

‘ y US to refrain from imsmg domestic content
restrictions (e.g. “Buy Ame ” ' -ä-vis EU suppliers,

7 SCI‘ViCCS in procurement b5? ääub—federal entities (states, 

     

      

    

 

  

   

  

restrictions Including stricte domestic con’fEn
x goods, services, suppliers " ' '
sub—federal ‚tities where

   
   

 

 

major
 of State government
 es as defined‘ below.

   
   
   

 

 

 

 

  

{2%

JJ recalls that the issue of “flow-dääm” was raised in the EU benchm

 

nträä: evel and that its appearance h
schedule this commit
place t0 exempt restric

is done "without prejudice" as
in the end. Inter alia, the reserv'fions which are currently in

    

would be lifted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

  
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2July 2014 ’ ii
Without prejudice

-  rchasing Agents and Designa ed Purchasing Agents,
as well as their subordi 

  
 
   

   

   

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehe‘  "sive coverag
without major restrictio

   
 
    

 

eal programs and e  

ove ge should be extended t0, forigäxample,
 ' lecommunications service '- „ Also

      

respect tö
transport '

  
      
     

 

 

   
   
  

 

on-applicaggn of domestic content restr :_
_ commitment 'would apply: o the main preference progammes
applied by State and othe i nb—central entities, such as 3 =asides
esses, but not for limited  clearly circurhscribed

 
 

im
- 'ü
ä

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

       

TTIP Negatiations 2 July 2014
\ Without prejudice

application „such policies vis-ä—vis EU
and service providers.

 

ds, services, suppliers

    
 
  

 

  
 

 as follows: Goods (supp '
200.000, Construction serviäös (works): SDR 5.000.000.

 

 
 
 
  

 
       
   
 

 

 ents as identified above W „‚
the disciplines of the recent-L revised GPA t0 the full exte
 . . d

 

 

  

8. The EU alscgw serves the right t0 req
2% t0 other entities which wogfid qu