INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log# 1022335/U# 07-27
INVESTIGATION
NUMBER:
LOG #1022335 / U#07-27
ACCUSED
OFFICER
INVOLVED:

OFFICER(1)’S
INJURIES:
ACCUSED
OFFICER
INVOLVED:

OFFICER(2)’S
INJURIES:
ACCUSED
WITNESS
OFFICER :

“Officer A” (Chicago Police Officer); Male/White; 32 years old;
On Duty; In Uniform; Year of Appointment – 2005
(Did not discharge weapon).

None reported.

“Officer B” (Chicago Police Officer); Male/White; 38 years old;
On Duty; In Uniform; Year of Appointment – 2003

None reported.

“Officer C” (Chicago Police Officer); Male/White; 32 years old;
On Duty; In Uniform; Year of Appointment – 2004

OFFICER(3)’S
INJURIES:

None reported.

SUBJECT:

“Subject 1”; Male/Black; 17 years old

SUBJECT’S
INJURIES:

Gunshot wound to the neck; Transported to Mount Sinai Hospital.

INITIAL
INCIDENT:

Street Stop

DATE/TIME
OF INCIDENT:

23 August 2007, approximately 2227 hours.

LOCATION:

Near 3939 W. Wilcox

1

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log# 1022335/U# 07-27
INVESTIGATION:
In a report submitted by Acting Assistant Deputy Superintendent A it is
reported that on 23 August 2007, at 2235 hours, Operations Command notified him of a
police involved shooting in the 11th District, at 3939 West Wilcox. Acting Assistant
Deputy Superintendent A responded to the scene and interviewed various police
personnel including Officer A, Officer B and Officer C, assigned to Unit 253.
Officers A, B and C, assigned to Unit 253, Beat 4224C, were patrolling the 11th
District’s Level Two Deployment Area. The officers had just completed a traffic stop in
the area during which they issued a traffic citation. At this time, the officers observed
three black males walking northbound on Springfield toward Adams. One of the black
males, now known as Subject 1, was wearing a heavy jacket that appeared to hang
significantly lower on the right side and he was holding the right side of the jacket.
Because the weather was warm, the officers wanted to conduct a field interview of the
subjects.
Officers A and B approached the black males on foot. The two subjects walking
with Subject 1 looked at Subject 1, Subject 1 fled from the approaching officers with
Officer A immediately behind him in pursuit. Officer B followed approximately 10-15
feet behind and simultaneously, Officer C proceeded westbound on Adams in the police
vehicle in an effort to block any possible escape routes. Subject 1 fled northbound on
Springfield, then westbound on Adams, entering the enclosed lot of the Delano Grammar
School. As he fled, Subject 1 held onto the right side of his jacket while reaching under
his jacket with his left hand, throwing objects to the ground. Officers A and B repeatedly
shouted for Subject 1 to stop but he ignored their commands and continued to flee from
the officers.
Subject 1 ran the entire length of the school lot, entered a darkened alcove and
turned toward Officers A and B. The officers repeatedly instructed Subject 1 to show his
hands and place them up. Subject 1 responded by pulling up his jacket, reaching for a
shiny metallic object in his waistband area and thrusting his hand directly at the officers.
Officers A and B, in fear of their lives, fired upon Subject 1. Officer A fired two rounds
and Officer B fired one round. Officer C had driven the police vehicle around the school
lot and onto Wilcox where he exited his vehicle and observed Subject 1 in the darken
alcove with his back towards him, facing Officers A and B. Officer C heard Officers A
and B repeatedly instruct Subject 1 to show his hands and then he heard three shots.
Medical assistance was immediately requested for Subject 1. Officers re-traced
the route of the pursuit and officers recovered suspect narcotics.
Weapons belonging to Officer A and Officer B were recovered and inspected by
Crime Lab personnel.
The Roundtable Report submitted by IPRA Investigator A, in essence related
the same information as reported in ADS report.

2

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log# 1022335/U# 07-27
Officer A, related to the Roundtable Panel that he and his partners were at
Adams and Springfield to conduct a traffic stop when they observed Subject 1 and the
two unidentified black males walking northbound on Springfield. Officer A observed that
Subject 1 was wearing beige parka (jacket) and that Subject 1 was holding the right side
of the jacket, which drooped. Officers B and C approached Subject 1, who turned to run
southbound. Subject 1 saw Officer A and ran westbound on Adams and then northbound
into a school lot where he lost a shoe. Officer A’s attention was focused on Subject 1 and
Officer A did not see where the other two black males went. The officers repeatedly
announced their office and told Subject 1 to stop and put his hands in the air, but Subject
1 kept running. Subject 1 reached the corner of the lot, saw the squad car on the street and
ran back to Officers A and B, who yelled at Subject 1 to show his hands. Subject 1 raised
his coat and Officer A saw something shiny. Subject 1 reached for his waistband then
raised and extended his right hand and arm toward Officer A. Officer A, fearing for his
life, fired two times at Subject 1, who fell to the ground. Officer A approached Subject 1,
handcuffed him and asked if he was hit. Subject 1 replied that he was. Officer A then
heard his partners behind him calling for an ambulance. Officer A recovered suspect
narcotics, but did not recover a weapon at the scene.
Officer B related to the Roundtable Panel that after conducting a traffic stop, he
and his partners observed three black males on the west side of the Springfield, one of
whom was wearing a brown parka (jacket). Officer C approached Subject 1 to conduct a
field interview and Subject 1 ran westbound on Adams. Officer B got out of the car and
followed Officer A in running after Subject 1. They ran northbound through the school
let and turned westbound at the playground. When Subject 1 observed Officer C, who
had pulled up in front of him and near the exit of the playground lot, Subject 1 turned
around and faced Officers A and B. The officers told Subject 1 to put his hands up.
Subject 1 reached for his waist and raised his right hand in an aggressive manner toward
the officers. Fearing for his life, Officer B fired one shot. Officer B was standing to the
right and behind Officer A at this point, approximately 20 feet from Subject 1. The
officers placed Subject 1 in custody and radioed for an ambulance.
Officer C, related to the Roundtable Panel that he and his partners conducted a
traffic stop and issued the driver a citation. Officer C observed three black males walking
northbound on Springfield. Officer A wanted to conduct a field interview because
Subject 1 was wearing a large heavy coat. Officer A remained outside the police vehicle
and Officer C drove to the intersection of Springfield and Adams. Officer C shined the
spotlight on Subject 1 and asked him to his show his hands. Subject 1 turned to run
southbound, saw Officer A on foot and ran westbound on Adams. Officer B got out of
the squad car and chased Subject 1 with the Officer A. Officer C drove westbound to an
alley, drove down the alley to Wilcox and turned right, stopping near the gate to the
school lot. When Officer C first saw Subject 1, Subject 1 had his back to him and was
facing the other officers. Officer C got out of the squad car and heard Officers A and B
tell Subject 1 to show his hands. Officer C then heard three shots. He went to render aid
to Subject 1 and make sure that his partners were safe. Officer C radioed for an
ambulance.

3

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log# 1022335/U# 07-27
CPD Detective 1 related to the Roundtable Panel that he rode in CFD
Ambulance #10 with Subject 1 to Mount Sinai Hospital. Subject 1 provided CPD
Detective 1 with his name and told him that he was walking around the school. Subject 1
related that he ran from the police because he did not want to go jail and that the officers
shot him for no reason. After the paramedics and hospital staff treated Subject 1, he told
CPD Detective 1 that he was walking westbound on Springfield with his cousin “[First
Name]” and a friend whose name he did not know. The police pulled up next to them and
told them to stop. Subject 1 ran away until he got tired of running. The officers told him
to put his hand in the air. Subject 1 stopped running and turned around and the officers
shot him. Subject 1 sustained a through-and-through gunshot wound to the fleshly tissue
below the chin. Subject 1’s father was at the hospital and confirmed that “[First Name]”
was with Subject 1 earlier in the evening, but did not have any further information for
“[First Name].”
In an interview provided on 24 August 2007, to IPRA Investigator B, Witness 1
related that she and a friend, Witness 2, were sitting on her front porch drinking beer
when she observed officers stop their (the Officers’) vehicle at a curb close to a school,
exit and conduct a traffic stop of an unidentified vehicle occupied by an unknown black
male and black female. As the officers completed the traffic stop and were in the process
of the leaving the area, they observed two black male teenagers walking eastbound on
Adams to Springfield. As the officers approached the black males, one stopped at the
open gate by the school and the second black male wearing a puffy coat, fidgeted and ran
through the school lot, followed by one of the officers. Witness 1 related that the officer,
who had his weapon in his hand, chased the male. Witness 1 heard four gunshots.
Witness 1 ran into the school lot, but was instructed by officers to leave. Witness 1
related that she and Witness 2 were the only people out on the street at the time of the
incident. Witness 1 related that she did not know the unknown black males, but
recognized one of them from the area.
During a canvass of the area, IPRA Investigator B, spoke with Witness 2[First
Name Only] (No further information). Witness 2 related that she did not wish to be
involved and refuse to provide a full name or contact information. Witness 2 related that
she and Witness 1 were sitting on Witness 1’s porch at XXXX W. Adams when she
observed a marked police vehicle with two unknown white male uniformed police
officers stop a male and female older black couple. The officers remained in the vehicle.
After the traffic stop, Witness 2 observed three black males walking southbound on
Springfield. The officers stopped the black males. One of them, who was wearing a
puffy coat, ran into the school lot. The passenger officer exited the vehicle, holding a gun
in his hand, and chased the black male. The driver officer exited the vehicle, chased the
black male behind the basketball court. Witness 2 heard three to four gunshots. Witness 1
and Witness 2 ran north on Springfield to Wilcox and onto the school lot and observed a
young man on the ground near the tree close to the gate facing Wilcox. Additional
officers arrived on the scene. Witness 2 related that because it was raining Witness 2 and
Witness 1 were the only people on the street.

4

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log# 1022335/U# 07-27
On 24 August 2007, IPRA Investigator C responded to Mount Sinai Hospital in
an attempt to obtain an interview from Subject 1. Subject 1 refused to provide an
interview. IPRA Investigator C spoke with the attending physician, Doctor A. Doctor A
stated that Subject 1 appeared to have sustained a through-and-through gunshot wound
under his chin, and that the round did not strike Subject 1’s throat, voice box or any other
major organ.
In an in-person signed statement taken at IPRA on 29 September 2007 by IPRA
Investigator D, Victim Subject 1, in the presence Attorney A and Subject 1’s father,
[Father of Subject 1] , related that he and his cousin, [First Name] and an unknown male
friend were walking northbound on Springfield. Subject 1 explained that because it was
raining off and on during the evening, he wore a coat with a hood.
Subject 1 stated that two male/white uniformed officers in a blue and white
vehicle pulled up onto the sidewalk behind him. Subject 1 turned around and faced the
offices. The officers, exited the vehicle and stated, “Don’t move!” Subject 1 stated that
the officers did not have their guns out at the time. He stated that although the officers
instructed them not to move he ran because the officers got out of the cars too fast.
Subject 1 stated that he thought the officers were going to do something to him. Subject 1
stated that the officers in that area act crazy. Subject 1 had fear of the police, due to
hearing stories from others in the area. Subject 1 ran westbound on Pulaski, then doubled
back, and ran towards the schoolyard. One of the officers chased him on foot and the
other officer was in the police vehicle. Subject 1 ran into the schoolyard and towards the
exit gate, when he realized that there was a police vehicle in front of him and a second
vehicle outside of the gate. Officers instructed Subject 1 to place his hands in the air. One
officer then instructed Subject 1 to get on the ground. As Subject 1 moved his hands in a
downward motion to the get down on the ground, one of the officers shot him.
Subject 1 did not see the officer who shot him. Subject 1 later learned from the
media that officers put narcotics on his person. Subject 1 denied having drugs on his
person. Subject 1 related that when the officers initially stopped him, his hands were at
his side and not inside his coat pocket. At no time during the foot chase were his hands
inside of his pockets. Subject 1 related that his coat was open the entire time and that he
did not reach for his waistband. Subject 1 had no previous contact with either officer.
Medical records obtained from Mount Sinai Hospital reflect that Subject 1
sustained a gunshot wound to the neck.
A canvass of the area produced no additional witnesses or information.
OEMC records document that calls were made regarding a person shot from the
telephone numbers of XXX-XXX-XXXX, unidentified caller, and XXX-XXX-XXXX,
[Telephone Caller].

5

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log# 1022335/U# 07-27
An Attempt to Contact OEMC / 911 caller was unsuccessful. The telephone
number of XXX-XXX-XXXX, identified as the telephone number of [Telephone Caller
#2], was found to be out of service.
A personal visit was made to 911 caller [Telephone Caller], XXX-XXX-XXXX,
and additionally telephone contact was made. [Telephone Caller] related that she heard
approximately four gunshots and that she did not witness the police involved shooting.
Arrest Report CB# 16992505 associated with Subject 1 in essence reflects the
same account of the incident as reported in the ADS report and the Roundtable report.
Officers related that as Subject 1 fled, he ran through a school lot and he appeared to be
clutching his side as if he was holding a weapon. Officer A observed Subject 1 reach into
his pocket with his left hand and throw to the ground two clear plastic bags later to be
recovered as suspect narcotics. As Subject 1 fled through the school lot, he doubled back
and fled in the direction of Officers A and B. Subject 1 then pulled up his jacket with his
left hand and reached into his waistband with his right hand. The officers observed a
shiny object that the officers believed to be a weapon. Subject 1 raised his right hand
toward the direction of the officers. In fear of their safety, the officers discharged their
weapons and struck Subject 1 who was subsequently arrested. The shiny object, which
the officers believed to be a weapon, was a belt buckle on Subject 1’s pants. Subject 1
was charged with two counts of possession.
Case Supplementary Report RD# HN546743 reflects in essence the same
information as reported in the General Case report and ADS report. In addition, the report
reflects CPD Detective 1 and CPD Detective 2 spoke with Subject 1 at Mount Sinai
Hospital. The detectives informed Subject 1 of his rights. Subject 1 stated that he was
walking when police chased him for no reason. He ran through a school lot and stopped
when he got tired. When Subject 1 stopped, he raised his hands in the air and when he
placed his hands by his waistband the officer shot him.
Evidence Technician photographs taken on the date of the incident depict
images of the scene and numbered evidence.
Additional photographs depict a shiny belt buckle attached to a green belt
looped around the waistband of a pair of blue jeans.
Tactical Response Reports submitted by Officer B and Officer A, document
that Subject 1 posed an imminent threat to the officers. The officers responded with the
use of deadly force in that they discharged their weapons.
Inventory reports document that officers recovered articles of clothing, suspect
narcotics, and fired ammunition.
Forensic Investigators recovered and inventoried weapons belonging to Officers
A and B.

6

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log# 1022335/U# 07-27
Reports obtained from the Illinois State Police Lab documents that the weapons
belonging to Officer A and Officer B were tested and found to be in working condition.
Reports obtained from the Illinois State Police Lab documents that the
inventoried suspect narcotics, recovered from Subject 1, was tested and no scheduled
substance was found.
On 16 September 2009, Subject 1 received a settlement relative to Civil Suit #
08 CV3803 in the amount of $48,432.00.
In a digitally recorded interview taken at IPRA on 08 June 2011, Accused Officer
A related in essence the same information as reported to the Roundtable Panel and in
submitted Department reports. Additionally, Officer A related that during the foot chase,
he gave Subject 1 verbal commands to stop, but he failed to comply. Officer A stayed in
radio contact with Officers B and C during the foot chase. Officer A observed that
Subject 1 ran with his right arm clutched to his side and his left hand reaching inside of
his jacket and threw out a white bag holding possible narcotics.
As Subject 1 reached the alcove at 3939 W. Wilcox, he turned and ran back
towards Officer A, who had his weapon raised and instructed him to stop, but Subject 1
failed to comply. As Officer A repeatedly instructed Subject 1 to place his hands in the
air, he heard Officer B behind him also giving Subject 1 verbal commands to stop.
Suddenly, Subject 1 stopped, turned and ran towards the officers. Officer A again
instructed Subject 1 to place his hands in the air, but he refused. Officer A, who had his
weapon drawn, approached Subject 1 and repeated his instructions and Subject 1 still
refused to comply. Officer A moved closer to Subject 1 and as he began to holster his
weapon, Subject 1 raised his jacket, reached into his pants. Officer A observed Subject 1
pull out and extend his arms forward toward him, at which time Officer A, who was
approximately 20 to 30 feet from Subject 1, drew his weapon and discharged his weapon
twice. Subject 1 placed his hands back into his jacket pockets and fell to the ground.
Officer A ordered Subject 1 to show his hands, but Subject 1 refused to comply. Officer
A asked Subject 1 if he had been shot and he replied yes. Officer A asked Officer B to
call for an ambulance. Officer A handcuffed Subject 1.
Officer A related that Subject 1 did not fire a weapon at him and there was no
weapon recovered at the scene. Officer Subject 1 was standing in the open when he fired
his weapon. The area where Subject 1 stood was dark. There was artificial lighting from
the street.
Officer A related that he was not aware that Officer B was also involved in the
foot chase and only became aware of his presence behind him, when Officer B fired his
weapon once at Subject 1.
Officer A related that he did not plant drugs on Subject 1, he did not falsely arrest
him nor did he shoot Subject 1 without justification. Officer A related that Subject 1

7

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log# 1022335/U# 07-27
failed to follow verbal commands and made a furtive move toward his waistband and
being in fear for his safety, he fired his weapon.
Officer A related the path of the foot chase to additional officers who arrived on
the scene. The additional officers on the scene recovered suspect narcotics.
Officer A related that the two unknown males with Subject 1 were no longer on
the scene. Officer A had no knowledge of their whereabouts.
In a digitally recorded interview taken at IPRA on 08 June 2011, Accused Officer
B, related in essence the same information as reported to the Roundtable Panel and in
Department reports. Officer B related that as Officer A pursued Subject 1 on foot,
Officer B exited the vehicle and followed. During the chase, Officer B lost briefly lost
sight of Subject 1. When he observed him again, Subject 1 was still running and being
followed by Officer A. Both he and Officer A repeatedly yelled for Subject 1 to stop but
he refused. Suddenly as Subject 1 entered the alcove, he stopped, turned toward the
officers, and with his left hand, lifted the bottom of his jacket and with right hand, he
reached toward his waistband. Officer B observed a shiny object, which Officer B
believed to be a weapon. Officer A fired two shots at Subject 1. In fear for his safety and
the safety of Officer A, Officer B fired once at Subject 1.
Officer B related that during the chase he did not observe Subject 1 throw
anything to the ground. Officer A informed him that during the chase he observed
Subject 1 throw something to the ground.
As Subject 1 lay on the ground, he continued to resist and the officers repeatedly
instructed him to stop, handcuffed him, and requested an ambulance.
Officer B denied the allegations attributed him. Officer A related that he did not
plant drugs on Subject 1, he did not falsely arrest him nor did he shoot Subject 1 without
justification.
On 25 July 2011, Accused Officer C, provided a digitally recorded interview to
IPRA. Officer C related on the date and time of the incident he was on duty, in a marked
squad car, and in uniform. Officer C stated that even though it had rained earlier that
night, the rain had stopped and it was dark outside. Officer C related that he and his two
partners, Officers A and B, attempted to conduct a street stop of three males in the
vicinity of 3939 W. Wilcox. Officer A noticed that one of the males (NKA Subject 1)
appeared to have a heavy object in his coat pocket. Officer A exited the car first to
approach Subject 1 and the other two individuals. Officer C related that he turned on the
headlights of the car, exited it, and told everyone to step in front of the vehicle and put
their hands on the car. Officer C stated two of the males complied and put their hands on
the car, but Subject 1 immediately fled on foot.
Officer C related that Subject 1 headed west and in the process of running, one of
Subject 1’s shoes came off. At this time, Officer A pursued Subject 1 on foot, followed

8

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log# 1022335/U# 07-27
by Officer B. Officer C got back inside the car and drove westbound in pursuit of Subject
1 as well. As Officer C turned northbound around the school and into an alley, Officer C
spotted Subject 1 again. When Officer C saw Subject 1, he got out of his car to chase
him on foot as Officers A and B were nearing Subject 1. Officer C stated that there was a
huge curb that he was looking down at and at which time Officer C heard “Show me your
hands.” Officer C related that when he looked up, shots were fired. Officer C stated that
he could not see who was firing their weapons because he was focused on Subject 1 and
it was really dark in this area as well. Officer C related that he did not know how many
shots were fired but that he could see Subject 1 falling to the ground and Officers A and
B with their weapons in their hands. Officer C related that although he did not see
Subject 1 pull a weapon out, he was positioned whereas he could only see Subject 1’s left
side.
The officers approached Subject 1 who was shot and lying on the ground. They
placed Subject 1 into custody and then called for backup and medical assistance. Officer
C related the he saw a gunshot or graze wound on the left side of Subject 1’s neck and
that Subject 1 was bleeding heavily.
Officer C related that he later found out while at the district station that a bag of
suspect narcotics was found at the scene and Subject 1 would be charged accordingly.
Officer C categorically denied the allegations against him. He stated that he did not stop
Subject 1 without justification, plant drugs on Subject 1, or falsely arrest him.

9

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log# 1022335/U# 07-27
CONCLUSION:
Based on the information obtained during this investigation, the Reporting
Investigator recommends that Allegation #1 that Officer B, Officer A and Officer C;
stopped Subject 1 without justification be NOT SUSAINED. The officers observed
Subject 1 who was wearing a heavy jacket on a warm and humid day. The jacket
appeared to be hanging low on one side and the officers decided to conduct a field
interview and were justified in doing so. Based on the officers’ account as well as
Subject 1, as the officers approached Subject 1 and his friends, Subject 1 immediately
fled. The remaining males complied with the officers’ orders.
Based on the information obtained during this investigation, the Reporting
Investigator recommends that Allegation #2 that Officer B, Officer A and Officer C,
planted narcotics on Subject 1 be NOT SUSTAINED. Officer A related in his statement
that during the foot chase he observed Subject 1 throw a clear baggie from his the pockets
from his jacket. Officers later recovered suspect narcotics in the path of the foot chase
involving Subject 1. Although Subject 1 denied being in possession of suspect narcotics,
the officers denied the allegations. There were no additional witnesses to the incident.
Based on the above, there is insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation.
Based on the information obtained during this investigation, the Reporting
Investigator recommends that Allegation #3 that Officer B, Officer A and Officer C,
falsely arrested Subject 1 be NOT SUSTAINED. Officers approached Subject 1 in an
attempt to conduct a field interview when he then fled the area on foot. During the
pursuit, Officer A observed Subject 1 discard items from his jacket pocket. During a
search of the area, officers recovered a plastic bag identified by Officer A as containing
suspect narcotics.
Based on the information obtained during this investigation the Reporting
Investigator recommends that Allegation #4 that Officer B and Officer A failed to
follow the provisions as set forth in the Use of Force Policy in that Officers A and B shot
Subject 1 without justification, be UNFOUNDED. 1 During the pursuit of Subject 1, the
officers believed that they observed a weapon on his person. Although officers did not
recover a weapon from the scene, the officers related that they observed something shiny
that led them to believe that Subject 1 had a weapon on his person. According to Officer
B, during the pursuit, Subject 1 stopped, turned toward the officers, lifted the bottom of
his jacket and reached toward his waistband. Officer B observed a shiny object, which he
believed to be a weapon. Similarly, Officer A related that Subject 1 raised his jacket,
reached into his pants, and extend his arms forward toward the officers. The officers
were in fear for their safety and discharged their weapons at Subject 1.

1

It should be noted that during the course of the investigation, although it was confirmed that both officers
fired at Subject 1, it was not determined which officer shot Subject 1.

10