INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log # 1060190/ U # 13-05
INVESTIGATION
NUMBER:
Log #1060190/ U #13-05
INVOLVED
OFFICER:

OFFICER’S
INJURIES:

WITNESS
OFFICERS:

“Officer A” (Chicago Police Officer); Male/White; 30 years old;
On Duty; Plain Clothes; Year of Appointment – 2007

Injured left foot; Transported to University of Illinois at Chicago
(UIC) Hospital

“Officer B” (Chicago Police Officer); Male/Black; 37 years old;
On Duty; Plain Clothes; Year of Appointment – 2007
“Officer C” (Chicago Police Officer); Male/Black; 34 years old;
On Duty; Plain Clothes; Year of Appointment – 2004
“Officer D” (Chicago Police Officer); Male/Hispanic; 38 years old;
On Duty; Plain Clothes; Year of Appointment – 2001

SUBJECT/
OFFENDER:
SUBJECT/
OFFENDER’S
INJURIES:

“Subject 1”; Male/Black; 26 years old

(1) Gunshot Wound to the Left Flank; (1) Gunshot Wound to the
Right Forearm

DATE/TIME:

16 February 2013; Approximately 1133 hours

LOCATION:

3905 West Chicago Avenue

Page 1 of 9

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log # 1060190/ U # 13-05
SUMMARY OF INCIDENT:
This investigation, in conjunction with information gained through the
investigation initiated by the Chicago Police Department, revealed the following.
On 16 February 2013, officers assigned to an 011th District Tactical team were
working a four man plain clothed detail. Officers A, B, C, and D were in an unmarked
vehicle on routine patrol in the area of Chicago Avenue and Springfield Avenue. While
traveling southbound on Springfield Ave, the officers observed a group of individuals
engaged in what that they believed to be a narcotics transaction on the northwest corner
of Chicago Avenue and Springfield Avenue. Officer A exited the vehicle from the front
passenger seat and approached the group of individuals. One of the persons, now
identified as Subject 1, broke from the crowd and began running into a parking lot.
Officer A gave chase. Subject 1 entered a gray minivan and attempted to put the vehicle
in reverse in order to leave the parking lot. Officer A approached on the driver’s side of
the minivan, ordering Subject 1 to exit the vehicle. Subject 1 continued to drive in
reverse, nearly striking Officer A.
Subsequently, the unmarked police vehicle entered the parking lot and began to
approach the minivan. Officer A was now positioned between the front of the minivan
and the approaching police vehicle. Subject 1 put his vehicle into drive and drove
forward, toward Officer A. Officer A had his weapon drawn and continued to order
Subject 1 to stop and exit the vehicle. Subject 1 continued to drive forward, trapping
Officer A between the minivan and the police vehicle. With nowhere to go, Officer A
jumped up in order to avoid being struck by the minivan. Officer A landed on the hood of
the approaching minivan as the front of the minivan struck the front of the police vehicle.
Officer A’s foot went through the front grille of the police vehicle, injuring him. Officer
A fired three rounds into the front windshield of the minivan, striking Subject 1. Subject
1 fell into the front passenger seat of the vehicle. Subject 1 exited from the passenger
side of the vehicle and was placed into custody. Chicago Fire Department Ambulance
#10 transported Subject 1 to Mt. Sinai Hospital, where he was treated for a gunshot
wound to the right forearm and a gunshot wound to the left flank. Chicago Fire
Department Ambulance #44 transported Officer A to University of Illinois Hospital
where he was treated for pain to his left foot.

Page 2 of 9

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log # 1060190/ U # 13-05
INVESTIGATION:
Department Reports, the Tactical Response Report (TRR) and the Officers’
Battery Report (OBR), all provided information that is consistent with the statements
given by the involved officers and the independent witnesses.
The OEMC and PCAD Reports were collected and made part of this
investigation. An analysis of said documents show no information that is inconsistent
with the facts as related by the involved and witness officers. Attempts to locate
additional independent witnesses were made to no avail.
The Chicago Fire Department Ambulance Report documented that EMS was
dispatched at 11:37:48 and their arrival time on scene was 11:40:59. Upon arrival,
Subject 1 was lying on his back outside of a silver minivan, on the passenger side, with
the door open. The narrative indicated that Subject 1 complained of pain to his right arm
and lower back. Furthermore, the report documented that an assessment of Subject 1
revealed a gunshot to the right wrist/forearm and left flank.
A personal visit was made to Mt. Sinai Hospital on 16 February 2013. IPRA
Investigator A, spoke with attending physician, Doctor A. Doctor A informed IPRA
Investigator A that Subject 1 sustained a “through and through” gunshot wound to his
lower back area and a gunshot wound to his right forearm. Doctor A further related that
Subject 1’s condition was stable.
A Canvass of the area of the incident was made in an attempt to locate additional
witnesses and/or evidence. Two possible witnesses were identified. Multiple attempts
were made to interview the two possible witnesses. However, both refused to cooperate
with the investigation.
According to Medical Records from Mt. Sinai Hospital, Subject 1 was treated
for multiple gunshot wounds; one to his right forearm and one to his left flank.
Evidence Technician Photographs documented the crime scene, the involved
officer and Subject 1’s injuries.
A search of Police Observation Devices (PODS) in the vicinity of the incident
revealed two PODS. The PODS did not capture the actual police involved shooting. It is
noted that the PODS did not depict anything contrary to what was reported.
Illinois State Police Forensic Science Laboratory Reports document the
examination of the recovered ballistic evidence in comparison to the firearm belonging to
Officer A. It was determined that the shell casings recovered at the scene of this event
were fired from Officer A’s Smith and Wesson 9mm, Semi-Automatic pistol; Serial #
MPN6062.

Page 3 of 9

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log # 1060190/ U # 13-05
The Chicago Fire Department Ambulance Report documented that EMS was
dispatched at 12:26:16 and their arrival time on scene was 12:33:15. Upon arrival,
Officer A complained of left foot/ankle pain. The report indicated that Officer A
explained that his foot was caught between Subject 1’s vehicle and the responding
officers’ vehicle. Officer A was transported to hospital for treatment.
According to Medical Records from the University of Illinois at Chicago
(UIC) Hospital, Officer A was treated for pain to his left foot caused from being pinned
between two vehicles.
In separate statements to IPRA, Independent Witnesses 1 and 2 provided
information consistent with the Department Reports, the involved officers’ statements
and the Summary contained within this report. Witness 1 and Witness 2 in separate
statements stated that they observed a black male, now identified as Subject 1, run into a
parking lot and enter a minivan. Witness 1 and Witness 2 explained that they observed
an officer, now identified as Officer A, on the driver’s side of Subject 1’s vehicle,
ordering Subject 1 to exit the vehicle.
Witness 1 and Witness 2 stated that Subject 1 reversed his vehicle, while Officer
A continued to order him to exit the vehicle. Witness 1 and Witness 2 explained that
after Subject 1 reversed his vehicle, the vehicle was positioned in a manner that put
Officer A in front of the vehicle. Subsequently, Witness 1 and Witness 2 observed an
unmarked squad car drive into the lot and towards Subject 1’s vehicle. At the same time,
Subject 1 drove forward and towards the officer’s vehicle, causing Officer A to be
trapped between the two vehicles. Witness 1 and Witness 2 explained that they observed
Officer A jump onto the hood of Subject 1’s vehicle and fire his weapon three times into
the windshield of Subject 1’s vehicle. Witness 1 and Witness 2 stated that they heard
officers order Subject 1 to get out of the vehicle several times prior to Officer A firing his
weapon but Subject 1 failed to follow orders.
In a statement to IPRA, Officer B provided his account of this event in a
manner consistent with the Departmental Reports, witness accounts and the Summary
contained within this report. In said statement, Officer B articulated that on the date of
incident, he, Officers A, C, and D were on routine patrol in a four man unmarked vehicle.
Officer B explained that they observed a group of individuals at the corner of Chicago
Avenue and Springfield Avenue, engaged in what appeared to be a narcotics transaction.
Officer B explained that Subject 1 looked in their direction and jogged towards an empty
lot located at approximately 3905 W. Chicago Avenue. Officer B reported that Officer A
exited the vehicle and proceeded southbound across Chicago Avenue and towards the
empty lot. Officer B explained that they continued to drive and he exited the vehicle on
Springfield Avenue, at which time he observed Subject 1 enter a van in the empty lot.
Officer B stated Officers C and D continued to drive through the alley in an attempt to
enter the lot. Officer B explained that he saw Officer A in the lot and yelled to him that
Subject 1 was in the van.

Page 4 of 9

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log # 1060190/ U # 13-05
Officer B stated that there was a wooden fence that prevented him from entering
the lot, and he therefore jogged back on Springfield Avenue, towards Chicago Avenue,
in order to enter the lot. As he approached the lot, Officer B heard Officer A yell, “Stop.”
Officer B stated that he then saw Officer A on top of the hood of Subject 1’s van, trapped
between the squad car and Subject 1’s vehicle. Subsequently, Officer B heard three
consecutive shots. Officer B explained that he initially saw the van parked eastbound and
when he saw Officer A on the hood of the van, it was parked northbound. Upon entering
the lot, Officer B saw Subject 1 lying on the ground.
In a statement to IPRA, Officer C provided his account of this event in a
manner consistent with the Departmental Reports, witness accounts and the Summary
contained within this report. In said statement, Officer C articulated that Subject 1
disobeyed Officer A’s orders to get out of the vehicle, subsequently reversing the vehicle
he was driving and maneuvering the vehicle in a manner that caused Officer A to be
trapped between the officers’ and Subject 1’s vehicles. Officer C stated that prior to
Subject 1 reversing his vehicle, he yelled out “Reverse.” Officer C reported that he
observed Officer A jump on the hood of the vehicle Subject 1 was driving and fire three
rounds in succession.
Officer C explained that following the shooting, Subject 1 was taken out of the
vehicle and put on the ground. At that point, Subject 1 stated words to the effect of, “I’m
gonna get paid.” Officer C further reported that upon attempting to handcuff Subject 1,
Subject 1 informed the officers that he was shot. Officer C explained that he
subsequently requested EMS. After a search of the vehicle, Officer C reported that
narcotics were found in the driver’s side door of Subject 1’s vehicle.
In a statement to IPRA, Officer D provided his account of this event in a
manner consistent with the Departmental Reports, witness accounts and the Summary
contained within this report. In said statement, Officer D articulated that upon exiting the
police vehicle, he proceeded towards the passenger side of Subject 1’s vehicle. Officer D
stated that he gave Subject 1 verbal directions to unlock the doors. Officer D further
stated that he heard Officer C yell out “Reverse”, at which time Subject 1 reversed his
vehicle, turned and drove forward. At that point, Officer D observed Officer A at the
front of Subject 1’s vehicle, walking backward towards the squad car. Subsequently,
Officer A jumped up and onto Subject 1’s vehicle, drew his weapon, and fired three
rounds. Officer D stated that he heard the doors to Subject 1’s vehicle unlock and he
observed Subject 1 slouched over the passenger seat. Officer D then observed Subject 1
exit the vehicle and land on the ground. Officer D stated that he heard Subject 1 state
words to the effect of, “I’m gonna get paid.”
In a statement to IPRA, Officer A provided his account of this event in a
manner consistent with the Departmental Reports, witness accounts, and the Summary
contained within this report. In said statement, Officer A articulated that on the date of
incident, he, Officers B, C, and D were on routine patrol in an unmarked vehicle. Officer
A explained that they observed a group of individuals at the corner of Chicago Avenue
and Springfield Avenue. Officer A stated that it appeared that a narcotics transaction was

Page 5 of 9

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log # 1060190/ U # 13-05
going to occur. Officer A explained that Subject 1 looked in their direction and jogged
towards an empty lot located at 3905 W. Chicago Avenue. Officer A reported that he
exited the vehicle and proceeded towards the empty lot. Officer A explained that upon
entering the lot, he observed three vehicles parked against a wall, all facing eastbound.
Officer A reported that he approached the vehicles looking for Subject 1, at which
time he observed Officer B, who subsequently told him that Subject 1 was in the van.
Officer A stated that he approached the driver’s side door and observed Subject 1 start
the ignition. Officer A related that he also observed Officer D at the passenger side
window ordering Subject 1 to stop and turn off the vehicle. Officer A stated that Subject
1 reversed the vehicle and he attempted to move out of the way, ending up in the middle
of the parking lot facing the front of Subject 1’s vehicle.
Officer A reported that Subject 1 began to drive towards him, at which time he
walked backwards to gain distance. After he took several steps back, Officer A realized
that he had backed up into the squad car and he had nowhere to go. Fearing for his life,
Officer A stated that he jumped up and landed on the hood of Subject 1’s vehicle.
Officer A explained that subsequent to landing on Subject 1’s vehicle, he fired his
weapon three consecutive times. Officer A stated that after he fired the last round, he
realized that the Subject 1’s vehicle had struck the squad car and his foot had hit the
squad car.
Officer A reported that he jumped off the vehicle and proceeded towards the
driver’s side of Subject 1’s vehicle. Officer A stated that he observed Officer D assisting
Subject 1 out of the passenger side door and onto the ground. Officer A reported that the
first thing Subject 1 said was, “I’m gonna get paid.” Subsequently, they learned that
Subject 1 had been shot.
In a statement to IPRA, Subject 1 stated that on the date and time of incident he
had gone to a store on Chicago Avenue, possibly called “The Hard Store,” where he
talked to a male named “[Male First Name].” After he left the store he spoke to some
people and a friend named “[Nickname]” outside. Subject 1 said that after he crossed the
street he walked to his vehicle located in an empty lot. Subject 1 explained that he
reversed the vehicle and as he was about to drive forward, he was blocked in by a police
vehicle. Subject 1 stated that an officer approached him on the passenger side of his
vehicle while another officer stood in front of his vehicle. Subject 1 explained that he
heard an officer say, “Police, police, police”, while the officer standing in front of his
vehicle jumped on the hood of his vehicle, fired his weapon once and struck him. As he
was falling over, the officer fired his weapon again striking him in the back. Subject 1
stated that the officer fired his weapon a third time but missed him. Subject 1 reported
that when the officer fired his weapon, he had his vehicle in park.
After the shooting, Subject 1 explained that he was pulled out of the vehicle and
he overheard an officer say “I tried to kill that mother fucker,” and another officer, whose
name he believed to be Officer B, state words to the effect of, “You should have killed

Page 6 of 9

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log # 1060190/ U # 13-05
that mother fucker.” Subject 1 further reported that the officers did not call for an
ambulance until after several minutes.

Page 7 of 9

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log # 1060190/ U # 13-05
CONCLUSION AND FINDINGS:
This investigation found that Officer A’s use of deadly force was in compliance
with Chicago Police Department Policy. According to the Chicago Police Department’s
General Order General Order 03-02-03 II:
A.

A sworn member is justified in using force likely to cause death or great
bodily harm only when he or she reasonably believes that such force is
necessary:
1. to prevent death or great bodily harm to the sworn member or to
another person, or;
2. to prevent an arrest from being defeated by resistance or escape and
the sworn member reasonably believes that the person to be arrested:
a. has committed or has attempted to commit a forcible felony
which involved the infliction, threatened infliction, or
threatened use of physical force likely to cause death or great
bodily harm or;
b. is attempting to escape by use of a deadly weapon or;
c. otherwise indicates that he or she will endanger human life or
inflict great bodily harm unless arrested without delay.

Officer A, along with multiple witness officers, observed Subject 1 involved in
what they believed to be a narcotics transaction. Upon seeing the officers, Subject 1 gave
chase, entered his vehicle and attempted to flee from officers. Officers Conner and
Sanchez gave Subject 1 repeated verbal direction to stop and exit the vehicle. Instead,
Subject 1 reversed his vehicle and positioned it in a manner that put Officer A directly in
front his vehicle. Subject 1 then drove forward, causing Officer A to be trapped in
between his vehicle and the officers’ vehicle.
Subject 1’s actions placed Officer A in imminent fear of great bodily harm or
death, both to himself, and his partners. Subsequently, Officer A jumped up, landing on
Subject 1’s vehicle and fired his weapon multiple times, striking Subject 1 twice.
Multiple independent witnesses support the officers’ account of the event and
related that Subject 1’s actions placed Officer A in a position with no other available
options.
Although Subject 1 made claims that the officers did not immediately call for an
ambulance, OEMC and PCAD Reports indicated that the involved officers reported shots
fired by the police at 11:37:45 and the Chicago Fire Department Ambulance Report
indicated that that EMS was dispatched at 11:37:48. Additionally, Subject 1 made claims

Page 8 of 9

 INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
Log # 1060190/ U # 13-05
that he heard the officers state words to the effect of, “I tried to kill that mother fucker”
and “You should have killed that mother fucker.” There is no evidence to support this
claim.
Based on the totality of the circumstances, Officer A’s actions were reasonable to
prevent death or great bodily harm.

Page 9 of 9