Ww Reroca ive) IVER 1 Hie Pocus 10 Lilmomation Aut | Document haus on vets d 1 su acess 3 Ffomaten Flag State Inspection Summary Report Vessel Name -_Holiday stand Date of Inspection = June 28, 2016 Offical #- 344866 Location = Les Méchins, Quebec NOTES: Inspection in Les Mechins Quebec as result of TCMSS being made aware of excessive diminution of structure revealed at drydock requiring repair. The inspection concentrated on non- A monitoring inspection was completed June 28 onboard the vessel Holiday Island while the vessel was alongside the wharf in Les Méchins, Quebec. The inspection was completed by TCMSS inspectors Alin Blouin, Eric Desgagnés and André Doiron, Lioyd's Register Surveyor Igor Potey was also in attendance. The inspection was completed for the purpose of reviewing the structural defects reported to tis office atthe recent docking and survey ofthe vessel as well as a general overview of the condition of the ship. As there was only minimal crew onboard and there were no operational checks or ris carried out. The report does not provide recommendations for repairs it being understood thatthe Authorized Representative (AR) and Lloyd's Register (LR) will assess and complete in accordance with IACS and LR standards as necessary. Index: a. summary Observations b. Defect Notice attached (note thatthe structural defects already denified have not been included as they are considered to be ‘in-hand’ by AR. ©. Observations, recommendations to Authorized Representative 4. Comments on Recognized Organization performance 000010 CCT U TRIO PUT SUITE THT Atte 10 TTTTCATTIaRTont Fant © Document agus en vets do fk su acess formate Reference Information i. Uoyd's Register (LR) Survey reports accessible through Class Direct Live Database ii. Thickness Measurement (TM) reports of tanks in sketch form taken May/June 2016. Note: final TM reports in LR format not yet available. LR advised that TM reports were taken of shell plating as per LR rules these were not reviewed by TCMSS. Additional TM measurements were request by LR as per below items a-d and reviewed by TCMSS. a. TM reports and sketches of fore and aft peak tanks (RDIMS 12007613) b. TM reports and sketches of Aft heeling tanks port and starboard (RDIMS 11992331) ©. TM report of frame 154 in forepeak tank, (RDIMS 11996958) d. TM Reports and sketches of forward heeling tanks port and starboard (provided on site) ii. Report completed by Concept Nava titled ‘Preliminary Visual Survey’ dated June 9, 2016. C16- 43.009-R0. iv. Thickness Measurement report dated December 2010 provided by Lioyd's Register (RDIMS 12090507) Background Information The ship was partially delegated in 2004 and then fully delegated when the DSIP policy wos amended in 2007. Therefore TCMSS has not inspected the hull and machinery since 2004, the last monitoring inspection was completed by TCMSS in November 2014. Index of Acronyms Authorized Representative ~ AR Uoyd's Register ~ LR Recognized Organization - RO ‘Thickness Measurement ~ TM, Taken by ultrasonic measurement instrument 000011 Es «Rear relapud fine 45 he Rotess 10 lalnvhation Aut: Document haus on vets d 1 su acess 3 Fiona Summary Observations: 1. Tanks inspection observations: Tanks inspected: Aft Peak Tank, Frames -0-12 Aft Heeling Tanks Port and Starboard, Frames 28-44 Forward Heeling Tanks Port and Starboard, Frames 116-132 Fore Peak Tank, Frames 148-160+ Note that the objective of the TCMSS monitoring tank inspection was to perform a general oversight inspection only and not a detailed inspection for the purpose of assessing al required repairs. The observations confirm those results previously reported in the Concept Naval report and the TM sketches provided. In general the following statements apply to a tanks: ~ Itis apparent from visual observation that there is considerable corrosion present in all tanks from surface condition and ‘growth’ of scale present. - There s essentially no coating on the tanks. ~ Most of the ‘excessive’ corrosion is present in the upper 1 metre areas of the tanks as this area is most susceptible due to the high oxidation and ‘washing’ effect of the ballast water. ~ There sa considerable amount of scale and sludge in the bottom of the tanks that should be removed and area subsequently closely examined to ensure there are no additional areas that may require repair : - Fore Peak Previous repairs have been completed in this tank area in 2011 as well. TM readings indicate excessive diminution at horizontal diaphragms and girders Frames 156-160+, web frames152, 154 & 156 as well as shell at shear strake frames 152- 156. Note corrosion in lower area of floors as well © As per aft peak, longitudinal girders frames 156 forward and main deck, and aft bulkhead iwo hawser should be closely examined. 000012 EE i A oD A AN AN Document aigus en vert do su acces fom TRON ge i Ee t aad Typical corrosion a top of tank & Uo 49 i [BI ] [0 > Cd 1 Fd oe Hl Corrosion of fwd girder 000013 Document haus on vets d 1 su acess 3 Fiona - Aftpesk © Previous repairs have been completed in this tank area in 2011. TM readings. indicate excessive diminution at horizontal diaphragms and girders, Frame 4- 0. Particular attention should be paid to the main deck and longitudinal girders frames 4- 0 (+1) below main deck in addition to those already identified by TM readings as below excessive corrosion limit. One girder at centerline is separated from the surrounding structure and severely wasted. © Area of the forward bulkhead frame 12, especially behind hawser appears to be heavily corroded and may not have been previously identified § Eat w= > SEE Vg & AM % Bad FA SE 30 vO fe +A i ro i Al fy J hal =o Corroded aft girder - Aft Heeling Tank Port © Excessive corrosion indicated from TM readings and visual inspection largely at upper region of tank including oooots TT moe. Document aigus en vert do su acca fom * Watertight bulkhead at frame 28 and 44 * Web frames 32, 36,40 = Structure and brackets frames 29, through 43 = Shell plate at frames 43-44 at shear strake * Main deck longitudinal girders and bulkheads, (girder separated and holed at frame 28) * Main deck he ol aN iy Lhe d io ! Jt ng Ce gy | be ® aay Et A 8 ® ri b : Eph ie \ 3 bam o ¥ Fork Perforated girder - Aft Heeling Tank starboard © Excessive corrosion indicated from TM readings and visual inspection largely at upper region of tank including: * Watertight bulkhead at frame 28 and 44 (holed) * Web frames 32, 36,40 0001s Pw ot C2 TA dwn wn wn EEOC Recess puss he acssssie nivalis Sd < Document haus on vets do 1 su acess 3 Ffomaten * Structure and brackets frames 29, through 43 * Shell plate at frames 43-44 at shear strake = Main deck longitudinal girders and bulkheads, * Main deck (see note below) © Starboard forward corner of tank at frame 44 holed into adjacent compartment (fire pump compartment). Note that the bulkhead is insulated on the forward side concealing the perforation. © Note that the main deck iwo this tank was previously inserted but in sections, leaving the remaining deck area to corrode and now excessively corroded necessitating real. i Aa AN Lp £ * a i i ot FL L. Holed forward bulkhead Port Forward Heeling Tank © Excessive corrosion indicated from TM readings and visual inspection largely at upper region of tank including: wots TT reco YETI TSUNAMI Yoo YING Paes YOO ITTORPTRIRRAT Fk 7 Document duu on very de a sr Fcces a Ffomaton + Watertight bulkhead at frame 116 (perforated), and 132 * Web frames 120, 124, 128 + Structure and brackets frames 117 through 131 + Shell plate at frames shear strake frames 116-117 and 131-132 + Main deck longitudinal girders (excessive) and bulkheads, upper region and iwo WT bulkheads), + Main deck overall in areas not previously inserted © Bulkhead of tank at frame 116 holed into adjacent compartment. Note that the bulkhead is insulated on the forward side concealing the perforation. | 8 i ee oN Gd p oN Wastage of Longitudinal Girder 000017 - Record released pursuant to the Access to Information Act / Document haus on vets d 1 su acess 3 Flom 1. on 2 a gh Hoy 2 = A ER a A ( 7 Sta 4 a Er Cy ’ Ts Teer A a Bytes Ly wh LR i i mesh do Pn a wal lg EO RE joa SBR WED EE gts I Ae Lie dh] a p A] | a Al Perforated bulkhead i Starboard Forward Heeling Tank © Excessive corrosion indicated from TM readings and visual inspection largely at upper region of tank including: ] * Watertight bulkheads at frame 116 and 132 | * Web frames 120, 124,128 = Structure and brackets frames 112 through = Shell plate at shear strake | = Main deck longitudinal girders (excessive) and bulkheads (upper | region and iwo WT bulkheads), = Main deck, overall in areas not previously inserted | 0000s CCT 0 TRC PUT SURITIL 0 THE ACeest 10 TTTOT TRON Mat’ Document agus en vet do su acess formate % EE Rp Oy | E 7 ir ul bo EER ik Ls Lo 2 5 Ea A § I. Lg i fl yur ’ Typical view indicating wastage of bracket 2. Monitoring inspection of additional spaces a. Ageneral inspection of the vessel as per the DSIP monitoring work instructions was completed. Note that the sample inspection of load line related aspects of the vessel was conducted as well as document review. See attached Deficiency list for details of defects noted. b. Noted deck repair iwo passageway (former wash room area), upper deck. Deck is perforated and requires immediate steel renewal. c. Document review was completed, observed defects note on the attached Form B 000019 Document dhaigut ver do of ut Face formation E i Upper deck passageway condition 7 Fa 7 : | 2d | i er LB I AN i oh Bee 8 il: ic 1 mi Lj + ey s a ka i] id EAS ¥ 7 I [ade Li fm Fire Damper aoooz0 rea XY TXT SU TA YH Pau T00 ITITORTTRRRICAT ek 1 ocument dius en vets d fk su acces fone b. Deficiency Notice issued, Form B see attached ¢. Recommendation to Authorized Representative and additional comments 1. There is a considerable amount of scale and sludge in the bottom of the tanks that should be removed and area subsequently closely examined to ensure there are no additional areas that may require repair. 2. For a vessel this age we would recommend additional structural areas to consider for close up examination and possible TM readings; thruster area and chain locker, exposed tank tops especially in machinery spaces, upper deck. Please confirm close up inspection was completed in dry dock this year of the eight (8) sea boxes and the sea wells. 3. Proper cleaning, surface preparation and coating of the tanks following repairs would greatly reduce effects of corrosion an extend service life. 4. Additional TM measurements and reports requested i. TM report to be submitted on bhd. f. #12, iw.o. stbd. side chain locker. ii. TM report to be submitted 100% of hull plates i.w.o. fwd and aft heeling tanks port and stbd Biicomment: Note that although the Heeling and peak tanks were identified in 2007 a requiring annual inspection due to poor coating and condition TCMSS is hot aware that any additional measures were taken by the AR to arrest th d. Comments on RO performance: 1. Tank condition: i. The areas identified as needing repair are principally the four heeling tanks, (port and starboard, forward and aft) and the forward and aft peak tanks. LR records indicate the tanks were last inspected in April in 2012 with the exception of the forward peak tank which was inspected in April 2013. We note that the vessel is under the Continuous Hull Survey Scheme and the following note was added to LR records as a ‘Memo’ in April 2007: ‘Due to the lack of coating in all the W tanks, WB tanks shall be surveyed at each AS’ 000021 Le. Reesidngieancd pursusA i6 the cess to Luiosmalion Ard Document dl on vrs Ge 1a st Fees Formation ii. Note that the TM readings from December 2010 did not include the majority of the tank areas presently in need of repair. Only some side shell plating in way of the tanks that did not indicate any concern. LR records do not indicate the tanks under review were opened at the time of ‘special survey’ as they were not due inspection. The tanks referred were opened and inspected in 2012-13; TCMSS does not have a record that additional TM reading were requested or taken at that time. ii. We understand that the memo requiring annual inspection of water ballast tanks was imposed in accordance with Lioyd's Register procedures and not the applicable Regulations under the Canada Shipping Act 2001. However, we note that section 4.1 of the Authorization and Agreement Governing the Delegation of Statutory Functions for Vessels Registered in ] Canada; It is understood that the regulatory framework for Canadian Vessels that are inspected by the RO is the RO's rules and applicable IACS unified requirements/interpretations, applicable IACS Procedural Requirements, Unified Requirements and, unless indicated otherwise by the Minister, Unified Interpretations, and international conventions/standards (such as SOLAS or MARPOL) plus a Canadian Supplement that specifies the requirements of Canadian regulations. additional to those of the RO's rules and of the international conventions/standards'. iv. We note also that the inspection report of May 2015 indicated the following: ‘All tanks inspected and found efficient meanwhile. Structural condition GOOD. No coatings observed.” Vi. Referring to IACS Guideline #55 ‘Guidelines for Surveys, Assessment and Repair of Hull Structure’, although the guideline is for General Cargo Ships the principals of inspection should apply. The guideline indicates that Thickness loss cannot usually be judged visually until excessive loss has occurred.” The guideline does refer to the need for TM readings; 4.4.3 Thickness measurement should be carried out at points that adequately 000022 aa Document agus en vert do su acces fom represent the nature and extent of any corrosion or wastage of the respective structure (plate, web, etc.). TMi readings were requested at the periodic survey of the tanks in 2012: 13 or during Subsequent annual inspection. This recommendation is also referred ton the IACS guidelines, Part 2, (fore and aft regions) section 211 vii. The above report is limited to our observation onboard and the review of the documentation provided. Note that TCMSS is not privy to correspondence between TC Ferries, the operator and Lloyd's Register. From the above | would recommend inquiring with the RO to provide an explanation of the apparent irregularity concerning the inspection of the structure in question, as per the DSIP Authorization and Agreement 11.10) and the DSIP Work Instructions for RO's,s. 12 (RDIMS 9324358). 2. 1APP ~The vessel had new engines fitted in 2014, information onboard indicates the engines meet the requirements for Tier Il iaw the Vessel Pollution and Dangerous Chemicals Regulations. However the supplement to the IAPP was not updated accordingly. 3. The vessels Minimum Safe Manning Document that was valid as of May 2015 was for a maximum 399 persons, however the inspection certificate (85-0431) issued to the vessel in May 2015 allowed for a maximum of 508 persons in excess of MSMD. 4. Note that in accordance with TP 10943 for the vessel meets single compartment stability criteria only therefore maximum complement is now limited to 399. 5. LRis requested to provide a copy of the completed TM readings for hull envelope taken in 2016 as well as final readings taken iwo trim and heeling tanks. Additionally the following reading are requested: a. TM report to be submitted on bh. fr. #12, i.w.o. stbd. side chain locker. b. TM report to be submitted 100% of hull plates iw.o. fwd and aft heeling tanks port and stbd. 000023 Coe Record released pursuant to the Access to Information Act f Document haus on vets d a su acess 3 Ffomaten 6. The recent lightship survey report completed in May 2015 should be reviewed and approved by LR in accordance with TP 10043, Part , section 4. 7. Ris requested to confirm if close up inspection was completed in dry dock this year of the eight (8) sea boxes and the sea well. 000024