California State Board of Pharmacy BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY 1625 N. Market Blvd, N219, Sacramento. CA 95834 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS Phone: (916) 574?7900 GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR Fax: (916) 574-8618 August 6, 2015 Christopher McDaniel Buzzfeed 40 23rd Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10010 RE: Public Records Act Request Re: Priority Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dear Mr. McDaniel: This is to acknowledge receipt of your payment for records wherein you requested copies of "any and all records in the possession Of the Board, regardless of who produced them, regarding Priority Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and/or Dave Zeiger.? Please be advised the Board is providing its non-exempt available documents as specified in the responses below. Whenever a determination has been made not to disclose a record or parts of a record, that exemption determination was based upon express provisions Of law. Pursuant to your request the board is providing the following documents: 0 One (1) licensing file for Priority Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (WLS 5145). The file is comprised of approximately 20 pages. it One (1) licensing file and supporting documents for David Zeiger (RPH 26202). The file is comprised of approximately 20 pages. a One (1) disciplinary action case AC 2011 4346 taken against Priority Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (WLS 5145) these documents total approximately 16 pages. One hundred six (106) citation and fine documents issued to various parties which reference "Priority Pharmaceuticals, Inc.? these documents total approximately 165 pages. Please also be advised that an individual?s personal information such as home address, home phone number, personal e?mail address, social security number, FEIN numbers, drivers license number and date of birth, are exempt from disclosure pursuant to Government Code section 6254(k), which incorporates Civil Code section 1798.24 and Article I, Section Ofthe California Constitution. Please be advised that licensees do have the right to contest the citation and/or fine that they are issued. The outcome of the appeal may result in the affirmation, modification or dismissal Of the citation and/or fine. If an affirmation, modification or dismissal of the citation and/or fine occurred as a result of an Office conference, the appropriate document immediately follows the original document that was issued. Further, please be aware that if a licensee was Christopher McDaniel August 6, 2015 Page 2 recently issued a citation and/or fine, the citation may be affirmed, modified or dismissed at a later date. If you have any questions regarding this matter, you may contact me at (916) 574-7922 or via e-mail at Barbera.Schleicher@dca.ca.gov. Sincerely, Virginia Herold (fuj?gutive Office BY arm Barbera Schleicher Public Inquiry Analyst Enclosure: California State Board of Pharmacy i' - . STATE AND consumer; SERVICES AGENCY 1525 N. Market Blvd. Suite N219. Sacramento, 95334 . DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS Phone (916) Fax (916) 574-8618 (aging-I,? ARNOLD r: .l - I-ll'? .. r\ J0 APPLICATION FOR WHOLESALER LICENSE Close Corporation Owner A. Applicant information Please prinl orlype ALL BLANKS MUST BE IF NOT APPLICABLE, ENTER Name of Applicant (Business Name): - Applicant telephone number: Dl?ioi?litir Qhotvmeui?iceh, Em C. I555 i kaoli- 9225 Address of Npplicant: Number and Street City ?r State Zip Code Haifa? Emerita Voiletgr is. 4 indicate whether this application is for: San Die 3'0 Clo: New Application Change of ownership of an existing wholesaler licensed with the California Board of Pharmacy - E?ective'date of transaction: (as! our-tacm if this is a change of ownership, indicate below the previous name. address and license number of the wholesaler. Name: California license number. Address: Number and Street City State Zip Who will be the designated representative-in?charge* of operations at this location: Name ofdesignated representative-irecharge? California license Number . . . I r? Saves L. New 3% i i {to Name, business address and telephone number of person authorized to clarify information provided on this application Mama: I Telephone: Jamil L. Wafers Eggs (M all .K Address: Street any State Zip I - (L7 - ilriorao Quilt I-cmo \l EMUUAI, EL H3 34? mabm? a. Li 1 ?Under California law, the name used to describe any individual who is in charge of any wholesale drug premises {in California or elsewhere) will change on January 2006' from the former name: examples, to designated representative. For conventional use, the board will refer to such an individual as a designated representative throoghout this application .. Approved Cashier 7238 3 Date: Denied Date . Date 3) Amount Processed By: 17A-62 (Rev 1/05) Page 1 of 6 California State Board of Pharmacy 1525M. Market Blvd. Suite N219. Sacramento. CA 95834 Pine (916) 574-7900 Fax (916) 574-8518' - - STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER. GOVERNOR inn-- .7. . u. Jill! A. mi to" ?Ii-i APPLICATION FOR LICENSE Close corporation Owner A. Ap pliant Information Please pn'nltt type ALL BLANKS MUST BE IF NOT APPLECABLE. ENTER Name oflepiicani(Business Name): Applicant telephone number: Q: i one. [1 otjti code Ll tel?l? Address aAppfimt: Number and Street City State Zip Code WHO gift: We NQILW poi JEN it 30m Dram Ca Gigi/a I Indicate ?tether Itis application is for: NewApplicaion Change of ownership of an existing wholesaler licensed with the California Board of I Pharmacy Effective date of transaction: I If this is a change clownership. indicate below the previous name. address and license number of the wholesaler. Name: I California license number: {jg-i. ,thcmass: City State ZIP I Lento stomp-e sdDiStottD ?Sm I9me Cs . Who will bathe designated representative-in-charge* of operations at this location: Home of designated represenlativednechargef California license Number Dom LKFD arsh Ev C, V777 Name. bUSIness address and telephone number of person authorized to clarify information provided on this application Name: Telephone: Qima Kermit Laos) Li ou ease it 303 Zip Address: Street City State Limit: .Soi?ieo i'isevt?fgoice OPPI *Under California law. the name used to describe any individual who is in charge of any wholesale drug premises (in 1 California or elsewhere) will change on January 1. 2006. from the former name. examples. to designated representative. For conventional use. the board will refer to such an individual as a deSignated representative throughout this application Processed Approved Cashier Date: Denied Date Date Amount 17A-62 (Rev 1/05) Page 1 of6 B. Top 5 Owners In the space below provide the requested information for the top five owners. Under the heading "License Held" list any state professional or vocational licenses held; pharmacist, -physician.?podiatrist. dentist. veterinarian, attorney. or accountant. etc.. and the license number (if applicable). Each natural person listed below must also: - Complete and submit a Personal Background Affidavit (Form - - Copy of Request for Live Scan Service Form for the top ?ve owners verifying that ?ngerprints have been scanned and all applicable fees have been paid. For each owner that is a partnership. limited liability company or corporation, the member must: - Complete and submit Business Background Af?davit (Form tYA-t B). - Specify an individual authorized to act for and bind the limited liability company. such as a member. manager. or principallexecutive of?cer presidenUCEO. chairperson). This individual must also: - Complete and submit a Personal Background Af?davit (Form - Copy of Request for Live Scan Service Form verifying that ?ngerprints have been scanned and all applicable fees have been paid. Telephone number Name: (I David C. Zia-Mair . [iih (858ilioli 45,50 Address: Number and Street City State Zip Code HO HO genetics vatay we a Cam Q?tefto as Title: License Held (type and slate}: License Heid (type and sister." Lit: Held (type and slate}: I I i I {Hi C530 Rick 26,101 CA 5/ i Name otAuthorized A en I I r, Wt @550 Name: . - Telephone number ?l 3 Address: Number and Street City State Zip Code Title: License Held (type and slate]: Llcense Held (type and state]: License Held (type and slate}: Name of Authorized Agent Name: Telephone number i Address: Number and Street City State Zip Code Title: License Held (type and state): License Held (type and state): License Held (type and slate}: Name of Authorized Agent: 17A-62 (Rev 1/05) Page 2 of 6 Name: Telephone number I i Address: Number and Street City State Zip Code Title: License Held (type and slate): License Held (type and state]: License Held (type and slate}: ?Wame ofAuthorized Agent: Name: Telephone number . i 1 Address: Number and Street City State Zip Code Title: License Held (type and stale}: License Held (type and state): License Held (type and state]: Name of Authorized Agent: C. Executive Officers information in the space below (attach additional pages if necessary) Officer ofthe company. Under the heading ?License Held" held; pharmacist, physician, podiatrist, dentist, veterinarian, attorney. or accou number (if applicable). provide the requested information for each executive list any state professional or vocational licenses ritant, etc., and the license Leek 1,4359; (ll Name 1. . WM C- AE/?di iteii Address "Social security numberlFElN Hal/0 Sweeter veneer WM e9 title r2: License l-isld (type and state): License Held (type and state): License Held (type snd?state): License Held (type and state): Name Elma i marsin Address 9' ?Social security numberlFEiN bistro (awaits: Valle} 113:0 gm 0?s:th as License Held (type and slate): License Held (type and state]: Lloensa Held (type and state): License Held {type and slate): ex?; t?i'i?io COR 1 i080! iris Name Address ?Sociai security numberlFEiN License Held (lype and state]: 17A-62 (Rev 1/05) License Held (type and state): License Held (type and state}: License Held (type and slate]: Page 3 oils Name JAddress *Social security numberlFElN_H License Held (type and state]: License Held [type and state): License Held {Iype and stale}: License Held (type and state): Name Address *Social securily numberIFElN License Held (type and state]: License Held {type and state): License Held (type and state): License Held (type and slate}: D. Background Information L-.nl-F_ List all stetets} in which the applicant is or has been licensed as a wholesaler. pharmacy, manufacturer. or repackager {attach additional sheets if necessary): State Night?s; issue Date Has any disc1plinary or criminal action been taken against this license? if yes. you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes NO details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processigg of your application. State h'?rennbseer Issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? if yes. you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes No details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State mm: issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? if yes. you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes NO details. Failure to provide an eXplanation will delay the processing of your application. State H?r?t? issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? If yes. you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes No details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State 55:3: issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? if yes. you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes NO details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State H522: Issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? if yes. you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes No details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the I processing of your application. State tri?ing; issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? . if yes. you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes NO details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State ?15:53 issue Date Has any dis?ctplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? If yes, you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes ND details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the I processing of your application. State mans; issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? (Rev 1 IDS) Page 4 of6 . If yes, you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes El No details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State 332:: issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? if yes, you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes NO details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? if yes, you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes El No details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? If yes, you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes NO l] details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State Issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? If yes, you must attach a written eXplanation giving full Yes No details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State Elsa: issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? It yes, you must attach a written explanation giving lull Yes No details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State H8323: issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? if yes, you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes No details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State issue Date Has any disciplinaiy or criminal action been taken against this license? if yes, you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes No details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State mint): issue Date Has any. disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? if yes, you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes No details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State mils; issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? If yes, you must attach a written eXplanation giving full Yes ND l:l details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State bigger issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? If yes, you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes NO l3 details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State mint: issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? If yes, you must attach a written explanation giving full NO details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. - State mans; issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? if yes, you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes No l: details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State stint: issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminalaction been taken against this license? if yes, you must attach a written explanation giving lull NO details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. (Rev 1/05) Page 5 of6 State 33:15; Issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? If yes. you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes No details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State mags; Issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? if yes. you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes NO details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. State Issue Date Has any disciplinary or criminal action been taken against this license? if yes. you must attach a written explanation giving full Yes ND details. Failure to provide an explanation will delay the processing of your application. *Disctosure of a social security number {or federal employer identification number if a partnership) is mandatory. Section 30 of the Business and Professions Code and Public Law 94-455 [42 USCA 405jc][21[i3]j authorize collection of a social security number. A social security number or will be used exclusively for tax enforcement purposes. for purposes of compliance with any judgment or order for family support in accordance with section 11350.8 of the Welfare and Institutions Code and Family Code Section 17520. or for veri?cation "of licensure or examination status by a licensing or examination entity which utilizes a national examination and where'licensure is reciprocal with the requesting state. Failure to disclose a social security number or a FEIN. this application for initial or renewal license will not be processed AND will be reported to the Franchise Tax Board. which may assess a $100 penalty. E. Certification of Applicant PLEASE READ CAREFULLY AND SIGN BELOW This application must be approved by the California State Board of Pharmacy before a wholesaler license will be issued and the applicant can do business in California. If changes are made during the application process. the applicant may need to submit a new application with appropriate fees. Fees applied to this application are not transferable and are not refundable. All items of information in this application are mandatory. Failure to provide any of the requested information will result in the application being rejected as incomplete. Any material misrepresentation in the answer of any question is grounds for refusal or subsequent revocation of license. and a violation of the Penal Code of California. The information will be used to determine quali?cations for licensure under the California Pharmacy Law. The official responsible for information maintenance is the executive of?cer. (915) 5174-7900. 1625 N. Market Blvd. Suite N210. Sacramento. California 95834. The information may be transferred to another governmental agency. such as a law - enforcement agency. if necessary for it to perform its duties. Each individual has the right to review the ?les or records maintained on himfher by the Board of Pharmacy. unless the records are identi?ed as con?dential information and exempted by sections 1790.30 and 1798.40 of the Civil Code. Signature Block Under penalty of perjury. under the laws of the State of California, lcertify and af?rm that: I am a person authorized to act for and bind the applicant and I am at least 13 years of age; have read the foregoing application and know the contents thereof and each and every statement made therein is true and correct; I understand that falsi?cation of any information i this application may constitute grounds for denial or subsequent revocation of the license; no person other than the applicant [or applicants] has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant's [or applicants?j business to be conducted under the license for which this application is made; and all supplemental statements ?led with this application are true. complete and accurate. Signature of Person Authorized to Submit Application ?ow: more?. Name (please print) Title Date 0 OOSWYAJ 8?13 17A-62 (Rev 1/05) Page 6 of 6 T?C?rms? ?ame of designated representative-in-ohaige . Date California State Board of Pharmacy 1625 N. Market Blvd; Suite N219. Sacramento. CA 95834 Phone (916) 574-7900 Fax (915) 574-8613 Website - STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER. GOVERNOR REPORT OF DESIGNATED There must be one designated representative or pharmacist chosen as the designated representative-in-charge for each wholesaler or veterinary food-animal drug retailer (vet retailer)* location. If the designated representative?in-charge leaves the employment of the wholesaler or vet retailer. a new designated representative-in-charge must be reported to the board within 30 days. DO NOT USE THIS FORM TO REPORT A CHANGE Changes in the designated representative-in~charge must be reported on a Change of designated representativelneCharge (form 17AE-1). The licenses of all designated representatives or pharmacists working at the wholesaler or vet retailer must be current. (Please print or-lype} Name of wholesaler i0 hit)? Address new Barrera stag emit on re. 9m o?e a CA Telephone Number: Name of person reporting designated representative?in-chatge: ALL SECTIONS MUST BE COMPLETED Permit number (it known} Wartime u?t?t dads ?33m: Number and Street City State Zip Code roam (853) H?i?t 4?3150 - DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE INFORMATION Full name: Last First Middle EXC license No: mess twat Residence Address: Number and Street Cityr . State Zip Code telep?hone Number: I I Date of birth: (Month. Day. Tear) 'Social SecurityI numberPrevious name(s] include maiden name. also known as "aliases": i certify under penalty of perjury under the iaws of the State of California that ail statements, answers and represen ions at in the for 'gare true and accurate. - Mm, We e7 date I designated I presengtiveinrdharg?e 5' i 67 Is *Deslgnated representative for vet retailers must have specific training in addition to that required for wholesale designated representatives. NOTE: Under California law. the name used to describe any individual who is in charge of any wholesale drug premises (in California or elsewhere) will change on January 1. 2006. from the former name. exempts-e, to designated representative. For conventional use. the board will refer to such an individual as a designated representative throughout this application. 17A-3 (6/05) California State Board of Pharmacy STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY 1 625 N. Market Blvd, Suite N219, Sacramento, CA 95834 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS Phone (916) 574-7 900 Fax (916) 574-8618 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER. GOVERNOR Website - CERTIFICATION NS: This form is to be completed by the seller and submitted by the prospective owner with the application hr a change of ownership. Attach a copy of the pending purchase agreement. NOTICE: Tle current permit is not transferable and the current owner of record must maintain operations and control of the licensed premises (including renewing the permit) until a new application is approved by the Board of Pharmaq. The new owner must complete and attach the new application to this document. (Proof of authority to sell by any person, except a person whose name appears on the original permit, must accompany this certification.) (Please printorljpe) All blanks must be completed; if not applicable enter NIA This will cerlly that QC ISIV T?I?ttI-tce?xf w. . (name of individual. pertnershilp' ofcorporation "seller") has on "seller" shall transfer month/day/year (all, half, etc.) of the right, litle and interest in TIT-KM T?f?t?l?l (LEA I 1 I (name of premises) (permit number) locatedaLLILE'iD seam NQIIllxl etAlDl?dltt: San Dream. a. distal (street number and name) I (city) (state) 1 (zip code) To Enron?s.) 31m? (name of buyer(s)) A PARTNERSHIP, LIST THE NAMES OF ALL PARTNERS (all names must be listed) On completion of this sale and approval of the new permit, the original permit. and the current renewal must be returned to the California State Board of Pharmacy for cancellation, before the new permit will be released. Under penally of perjury under the laws of the State of California, each person whose signature appears below certi?es and says that: (1) he/she is the licensee, general partner or an executive officer of the corporate licensee named in this Seller's Certi?cation, duly authorized to make'this sale; and (2) all statements made int is Seller's Certi?cation are and corr t. If the seller is a partnership, all partners must sign below. "g 0 ?7 . ,3 rev pelt/10 Signature Name (please print) . Title Date Signature of Seller Name (please print) Title Date Signature of Seller Name (please print) Title Date 17A-B (Rev. 12/04) California State Board of Pharmacy 1625 N. Market Blvd, Suite N219. Sacramento. CA 95834 Phone (9.15) 574-7900 Fax (916) 574-8618 Web site: STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER. GOVERNOR I BUSINESS BACKGROUND AFFIDAVIT This form is to be completed by an individual authorized to act for or bind the corporation. All blanks must be completed; if not applicable enter Failure to furnish complete explanations, or omission of any information. will delay the processing of your application. This individual must also complete a Personal Background Af?davit if you reside out of state. submit one set of two completed ?ngerprint cards and the fingerprint processing fee of $66.00. if you reside in California. you must submit a copy of the Request for Live Scan Service Form verifying that fingerprints have been scanned and all applicable fees have been paid. Please print or type Business Name Telephone Number: 7i" ?Pivtrb?xaceu?i?t acts List-l 35% Address: Number and Street City State le dram Halal-0 Somewhat; vow?th s?D (are tilt?rain A - - Applicant telephone number: Name of applicant (business name): Pitfall? till? ?ldxc alto 09,60. Address of applicant: Number and Street City State Zip Matias Beretta wd?g?- thud 9st bitty-o c?x? QZLIQA My position with the applicantls: Esme owner Partner EZOf?cer Member El Stockholder (Check all that apply) Are you currently. or have you in the previous ?ve years, been an owner. member. or partner of any partnership, corporation. firm. or association whose application for a license has been denied or whose license has been revoked. suspended. or been placed on probation in California or any other state? Yes No if the answer is "yes." please provide the following information for each action taken. Please include cancelled permits. {Use additional sheets if necessary.) Company Name: - Type of License: License State: Position Held: Type of Action: Year of Action: Company Name: Type of License: License State: Position Held: '[ype of Action: Year oontion: Type of License: License #2 late: Position Held: Type of Action: Year of Action: 17A-1B Corp (1105) Page 1 of2 2. Have you ever been in violation of any provisions of California pharmacy law, including regulations? if ?yes,? please list each type of violation, license ty if necessary.) Yes No Ki pe, type of action, year of action and state. (Use additional sheets Company Name: Type of License: License #2 State: Position lrteld: Type ofAction: Year ofAction: i?Cbmpany Name: .Type of License: 1 License it: State: Position Held: 1 Type of Actio n: Year of Action: Company Name: Type of License: License it: Stats: Position Held: Type of Action: 3. Have you ever been convicted of, or pied no contest toI a violation of any law of a foreign country. the United States or of any state or local ordinances? You must include all misdemeanor and felony convictions regs those which have been set aside andtor dismissed under .not be reported.) {Traf?c violations of $500 or less need if "yes." please attach the relevant arrest and court documents. Please read carefully and sign below. Under penalty of'perjury, under the laws of the State of Bait to act for and bind the applicant and i am at least 18 years codi?cation and know the contents thereof and each and every statement made therein falsification of any information in this affidavit may constitute grounds for license; no other person other than the applicant for appiicants?} has any for applicants? business to be conducted under the license for which this affidavit tftdavit are true, complete and accurate. filed with thi 17A-1BCorp (1/05) i?Print Name Date Page 2 of 2 rdless of the age of the conviction. including Penal Code sections 1000 or 1203.4. Year of Action: Yes No fornta, i certify and affirm that: if) i am a personauthortzed age; (2) have read the foregoing background is true; (3) i understand that 07 rO/O'l denial or subsequent. revocation of the direct or indirect interest in the applicant's is made; all supplemental statements @r?i/r/O ?ea/egg .-, MD CO SECRETARY OF STATE 1, BILL JONES, Secretary .of State of the State of hereby certify: - That the attached transcript of pageiis] has been compared with the recerd on file in this dither?1?, of which it purports to be a copy, and that it is. fiifill, true and correctWITNESS WHEREOE I exmlicute this . vi?k? wt; and affix the Greet Sea]. of. fl? the State of this diay 01f. 'p . 41.11.?. 1. - 1-- .ux?nl ?Vim - - -: I DET 4 2002 ienoos see - FILED ii: the cries el 1hr Seaman pl State 2 at [he 5m: oi ARTICLES or WCORPORATION OCT 2.002 OF Priority Pharmaceuticals, Inc. I The name of this corporation is Priority Phannaoenticalsi Inc. ll The purpose of the corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for whic .1 a corporation may be organized under the General Corporation Law of Califoma either than the banking business, the trust company business or the practice of a profesijiilon permitted to be incorporated by the California Corporations Code. 5'5 . ijfor The name and address in the State of California of this corporation?s initial ageriiE service of process is: Timothy R. Binder - 12520 High Bluff Dr #360 San. Diego, CA 92130 IV This corporation is authorized to issue only one class of shares of stock; and the-illotal number of shares which this corporation is authorised to issue is 10,000. The liability ofthe directors of theeorporation for monetary damages shall be eliliininated to the fullest extent permissible under California law. - VI Th? Corp oration is authorised to indemni?v' the directors and of?cers of the corpoiijfation to the fullest extent permissible under California Law; if Monica Corben?finoomoraaiz Dated: October 1, 2002 California State Board of Pharmacy 1625 N. Market Blvd. Suite N219. Sacramento. CA 95834 Phone (915) 574-7900 Fax (916) 574-8618 Web site: PERSONAL BACKGROUND AFFIDAVIT All blanks must be completed; if not applicable enter Failure to furnish a complete explanation, or any omissions. will delay the processing of your application. STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER. GOVERNOR If you reside out of state. submit one set of two completed ?ngerprint cards and the fingerprint processing fee of $66.00. If you reside in California, you must submit a copy of the Request fo'r Live Scan Service Form verifying that fingerprints have been scanned and all applicable fees have been paid. Please Mr or type Full name: Last First Middle Telephone Number: 1r- a; r. o. re); Jo we} Address: Number and Street City State Zip Date of birth: (Month. Day?. Year} *Social Security number: Previous name(s) include maiden name. also known as (AKA's). "aliases": \druJ Leo Name of applicant (business name): Applicant telephone numberLips-tr me Address of applicant: Number and Street City State Zip \W?kaoy am fire: :9 "mt r? 1 My position with the applicant is: (Check all that apply) l? Partner Of?cer 1. El Other, please specify Sole owner Stockholder l] Member 1. Are youcurrently. or have you in the previous five years. been a manager. administrator. owner. member. officer. director. associate. or partner of any partnership. corporation. firm. or association whose application for a license has been denied or whose license has been revoked. suspended. or been placed on probation in California or any other state? permits. (Use additional sheets if'necessary.) Yes Nob if the answer is please provide the following information for each.action taken. Please include cancelled Company Name: Type of License: License State: Position Held: Type ofAction: - Year of Action: 17A-37 (Rev. ?05) Page 1 of3 .r-?r?ln ?ompany Name: Type of License: License State: Position Held: Type of Action: Year ofAction: Company Name: Type of License: License State: Position Held: Type of Action: Year at Action: 2. Have you ever had a professional or vocational license denied, suspended, revoked, voluntarily surrendered. sheets if necessary.) laced on probation or other disciplinary action taken by this or any other governmental authority in this state, any other state or by a federal regulatory agency? Yes Nm '1 If the answer is "yes," please provide company name, permit type, action, year of action and state. (Use additional Type of License: License Type of Action: Year of Action: State: Type of License: License Type of Action: Year of Action: State: Type of License: License Type of Action: Year of Action: State: 3. Have you ever been in violation of any provisions of California pharmacy law, including Yes No regulations? if "yes," please list each type of violation, license type, type of action, year of action and state. (Use additional sheets if necessary.) Type of License: License State: Type of Action: Year of Action: Type of License: License I State: Type of Action: Year of Action: Type of License: License at; State: Type of Action: Year of Action: Type of License: License State: Type of Action: Year of Action: (1/05) Page 2 of 3 Wnature I Print Name - (use? My!? 5 Q?Ftt?x?i? L. WUWEQVW I Date (?Jose (WE (Yuma. to lo?? 4. Have you ever been convicted of, or pied no contest to. a violation of any law of a loreign country. the United States or of any state or local ordinances? You must include all misdemeanor and felony convictions. regardless of the age of the conviction, including those which have been set aside and/or dismissed under Penal Code sections 1000 or 1203.4. (Traf?c violations of $500 or less need not be reported.) Yes Nag" If "yes," please attach the relevant arrest and court documents. 5. Do you currently engage in. or have you been engaged in the past two years in, the illegal use of controlled substances? Yes No/lZl; If yes," are you currently participating in a supervised rehabilitation program or professional assistance program which monitors you in order to assure that you are not engaging in the illegal use of controlled substances? Please attach a statement of explanation. Please read carefully and sign below. i understand that falsification of the information on this form may constitute grounds for denial or revocation of the license. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that all statements. answers and representations made in the foregoing individual personal af?davit, including all supplementary statements are true and accurate and that lpersonally completed this personal affidavit. *Disclosure of your social security number is mandatory. Business and Professions Code section 30 and Public Law 94- 455 (42 USC authorize collection of your social security number. Your social security number will be used exclusively for tax enforcement purposes of compliance with any judgement or order for tamin support in accordance with section 11350.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. or for veri?cation of examination entity which utilizes a national examination and where licensure is reciprocal with the requesting state. If you fail to disclose your social security number. your application for initial or renewal license will not be processed AND you will be reported to the Franchise Tax Board, which may assess a $100 penalty against you; (1/05) Page 3 of 3 STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, GOVERNOR California State Board of Pharmacy 1625 N. Market Blvd, Suite N219, Sacramento. CA 95834 Phone (915) 574-7900 Fax (916) 574-8618 Web site: PERSONAL BACKGROUND AFFIDAVIT All blanks must be completed; if not applicable enter Failure to furnish a complete explanation, or any omissions, will delay the processing of your application. If you reside out of state, submit one set of two completed fingerprint cards and the ?ngerprint processing fee of $66.00. If you reside in California, you must submit a copy of the-Request for Live Scan Service Form verifying that fingerprints have been scanned and all applicable fees have been paid. Please or type Telephone Number: Full name: Last First zei eel? (W Address: Number and Street City State Zip Date of birth: (Month, Day, Year] *Social Security number: Previous name(s) include maiden name, also khown as (AKA's), ?aliases?: Id Name of applicant (business name}: Applicant telephone number. WP desm cask edsAddress of applicant: Number and Street City State Zip H0240 extreme eatery exact a: K) 5mg (swag (A CFCLI (Check all that apply) Stockholder 'My position with the applicant is: El Soleowner I: Member Partner Officer Other, please specify 1. Are you currently, or have you in the previous five years, been a manager, administrator, owner, member, of?cer, director, associate, or partner of any partnership, corporation, ?rm, or association whose application for a license has been denied or whose Iicense has been Yes No a revoked, suSpended, or been placed on probation in California or any other state? I If the answer is "yes," please provide the following information for each action taken. Please include cancelled permits. (Use additional sheets if necessary.) Nam91 Type of License: License #2 State: Position Held: Type of Aouon: Year of Action: (Rev. 1/05) Page 1 01'3 Company Name: Type of License: License #2 State: Position Held: Type oontion: Year of Action: Type ol License: License State: Position Held: Company Name: Type of Action: Year of Action: 2. Have you ever had a profession surrendered, placed on probation or other disciplinary action taken by this or any other governmental authority in this state, any other state or by a federal regulatory agency? if the answer is "yes," please provide company name, permit type, action. year of action and state. sheets if necessary.) at or vocational license denied. SUSpEi?lded1 revoked. voluntarily Yes No IE: Use additional Type of License: License Type of Action: Year of Action: State: Type of License: License Type of Action: Year of Action: State: Type of License: License #2 Type of Action: Year of Action: State: 3. Have you ever been in violation of any provisions of California pharmacy law, including regulations? If "yes," please list each type of violation, license type, type of action, year of action and state. if necessary.) Yes No I. (Use additional sheets Type of License; License State: Type of Action: Year of Action: Type of License: License State: Type of Action: Year of Action: of License: License State: .Type of Action: Year of Action: Type of License: License State: Type of Action: Year of Action: Page 2 ot3 4. Have you ever been convicted of, or pied no contest to, a violation of any law of a foreign 5 NO country, the United States or of any state or local ordinances? You must include all I: 52' misdemeanor and felony convictions. regardless ofthe age of the cont/lotion, including those which have been set aside and/or dismissed under Penal Code sections 1000 or 1203.4. (Traf?c Violations of $500 or less need not be reported.) If "yes," please attach the relevant arrest and court documents. 5. Do you currently engage in, or have you been engaged in the past two years in, the illegal Yes No use of controlled substances? lf yes," are you currently participating in a supervised rehabilitation program or professional assistance program which monitors you in order to assure that you are not engaging in the illegal use of controlled substances? Please attach a statement of explanation. Please read carefully and sign below. understand that falsi?cation of the information on this form may constitute grounds for denial or revocation of the license. hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that all statements, answers and representations made in the foregoing individual personal affidavit, including all supplementary statements are true and accurate and that tper onaiiy completed this personal affidavit. Print Name . ,arm oath/J Ze/?rart "Roa/ 4:40 *Disclosure of your social security number is mandatory. Business and Professions Code section 30 and Public Law 94- 455 (42 USC 405(c)(2)(C) authorize collection of your social security number. Your social security number will be used exclusively for tax enforcement purposes of compliance With any judgement or order for family support in accordance with section 11350.6 of the Welfare and institutions Code, or for veri?cation of examination entity which utilizes a national examination and where licensure is reciproCal with the requesting state. If you fail to disclose your social security number, your application for initial or renewal license will not be processed AND you will be reported to the Franchise Tax Board, which may assess a $100 penalty against you. . . . . (1/05) Page 3 01?3 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTNIENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Accusation Against: Case No. 4346 - PRIORITY PHARMACEUTICALS INC. 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd, Suite San Diego, CA 9212] David Zeiger, President, Pharmacist License No. RPH 26202 OAH No. 2014020535 STIPULATED SURRENDER OF LICENSE AND ORDER AS TO PRIORITY PHARMACEUTICALS, Wholesaler License No. WLS 5145 and JANET LEE MARSH 30842 Wisteria Circle Mun?ieta, CA 92563 Designated Representative N0. EXC 17770 Respondents. DECISION AND ORDER The attached Stipulath Surrender of License and Order is here by adopted by the Board of Pharmacy, Department of Consumer Affairs, as its Decision in this matter. This decision shall become effective on March 13, 2015. It is so ORDERED on March 6, 2015. BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA By STAN C. WEISSER, Board President i wmqamewm? oo-qmm-wa?Owoo?OxM-DWNHO KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California GREGORY J. SALUTE Supervising Deputy Attorney General DESIREE l. KELLOGG Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 126461 JONATHAN I. LAWN Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 194552 110 West Street, Suite 1100 San Diego, CA 92101 P.O, Box 85266 Sam Diego, CA 92186?5266 Telephone: (619) 645-2996 Facsimile: (619) 645?2061 Attorneys for Complainant BEFORE THE BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA in the Matter 01" the Accusation Ageinst: PRIORITY PHARMACEUTICALS INC. 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd., Suite San Diego, CA 92121 DAVID ZEIGER, President, Pharmacist License No. RPH 26202 Case No, 4346 OAH No, 2014020535 STIPULATED SURRENDER OF LICENSE AND ORDER AS TO PRIORITY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. Wholesaler License No. WLS 5145 and JANET LEE MARSH 30842 Wisteria Circle Murrieta, CA 92563 Respondents; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and hetween the parties to the above? entitled proceedings that the following matters are true: PARTIES 1. Virginia Herold (Complainant) is the Executive Of?cer of the Board 01" Pharmacy. She brought this action solely in her of?cial capacity and is represented in this matter by Kamala Stipulated Surrender of License (Case No. 43-46) - Harris, Attorney General of the State of California, by Desiree I. Kellogg, Deputy Attorney General and Jonathan I. Lapin, Deputy Attorney General. 2. Priority Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Respondent) is represented in this proceeding by attorneys John A. Cronin and PcteifS. Gregorovic of Fredrickson, Mazeika Grant, LLP, whose address is 5720 Oberlin Drive, San Diego, CA 9212i. - 3. On or about December 3, 2007, the Board of Pharmacy issued Wholesaler License No. WLS 5145 to Priority Pharmaceuticals, inc. (Respondent). The Wholesaler License was in full force and effect at all times relevant to the charges brought in AccusationNo. 4346 and will expire on December 1, 2015, unless renewed. meow 4. Accusation No. 4346 Was ?led before the Board of Pharmacy (Board), Department of Consumer Affairs, and is currently pending against Respondent. The Accusation and all other statutorily required documents were properly served on Respondent on September 17, 2012. Reapondent timely ?led its Notice of Defense contesting the Accusaticn. A copy of Accusation No. 4346 is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference. AND WAWERS 5. Respondent has carefully read, fully discussed with counsel, and understands the charges and allegations in Accusation No. 4346. ReSpond'ent also has carefully read, fully discussed with counsel, and understands the effects of this Stipulated Surrender of License and Order. 6. Respondent is fully aware of its legal rights in this matter, including the right to a hearing on the charges and allegations in the Accusation; the right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against them; the right to present evidence and to testify on its own behalf; the right to the issuance of subpoenas to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents; the right to reconsideration and court review of an adverse decisiOn; and all other rights accorded by the California Administrative Procedure Act and other applicable laws. 7. Respondent voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waives and gives up each and eVery right set forth above. Stipulated Surrender. of Licence (Case No. 4346) - - . CULPABILITY 8. Respondent understands that the charges and allegations in Accusation No. 4346, if proven at a hearing, constitute cause for imposing discipline upon its Wholesaler License. 9. While Respondent believes that a significant legal issue exists with respect to statutory interpretation of Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, solely for the purpose of resolving the Accusation without the expense and uncertainty of further proceedings, Respondent agrees that, at a hearing, Complainant could establish a prima facie case for the charges in the Accusation and that those charges constitute cause for discipline. Respondent hereby gives up its right to contest that cause for discipline exists based on those charges. 10. Respondent understands that by signing this stipulation it enables the Board to issue an order accepting the voluntary surrender of its Wholesale License without further process. I. This stipulation shall be subject to approval by the Board of Pharmacy. Respondent understands and agrees that counsel for Complainant and the staff of the Board of Pharmacy may cemmunicate directly with the Board regarding this stipulation and surrender, without notice to or participation by ReSpondent or its counsel. By signing the stipulation, Respondent understands and agrees that it may not withdraw its agreement or seek to rescind the stipulation prior to the time the Board considers and acts upon it. If the Board fails to adopt this stipulation as its Decision and Order, the Stipulated Surrender and Disciplinary Order shall be of no "Force or effect, except for this paragraph, it shall be inadmissible in any legal action between the parties, and the Board shall not be disquali?ed from further action by having considered this matter. 12. The parties understand and agree that Portable Document Format (PDF) and facsimile copies ofthis stipulated Surrender of License and Order, including Portable Document Format (PDF) and facsimile signatures thereto, shall hare the same force and effect as the originals. 13. This Stipulated Surrender of License and Order is intended by the parties to be an integrated writing representingthe complete, ?nal, and exclusive embodiment of their agreement. It supersedes any and all prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings. discussions, negotiations, and commitments (written or oral). This Stipulated Surrender of License and Order Stipulated Surrender of License (Case-bio. 4346) I A- 43.1.0 orch altered, amended, modi?ed, supplemented, or otherwise changed except by a writing executed by an authorized representative of each of the parties. 14. in consideration of the foregoing admissions and stipulations, the parties agree that the Board may, without further notice or formal proceeding, issue and enter the following Order: ORDER IT 18 HEREBY ORDERED that Wholesaler LicenSe No. WLS 5145 is surrendered and accepted by the Board of Pharmacy. 1. The voluntary surrender of Respondent?s Wholesaler License and the acceptance of the surrendered license by the Board shall constitute the imposition of discipline against Respondent. This stipulation constitutes a record of the discipline and shall become a part of Respondent?s license history with the Board of Pharmacy. 2. Respondent shall relinquish and therefore lose all rights and privileges as a wholesaler in California as of the effective date of the Board?s Decision and Order. 3, Respondent shall cause to be delivered to the Board its pocket license and, if one was issued, its Wall certificates on or before the effective date of the Decision and Order. 4. if Respondent ever applies for licensure or petitions for reinstatement in the State of California, the Board shall treat it as a new application for Iicensure. Respondent must comply with all the laws, regulations and procedures for licensure in effect at the time the application or petition is ?led, and while Respondent believes that a significant legal issue exists with respect to the statutory interpretation of Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, it acknowledges that Complainant established a prima facie case for the all of the charges in Accusation No. 4346 and that those charges constitute cause for discipline when the Board determines whether to grant or deny the application or petition. 5.. Respondent shall pay the agency its costs of investigation and enforcement in the amount of $70,000.00 as a condition precedent to the granting of any new license or petition for reinstatement. David Zeiger shall be jointly and severally liable for the payment of these costs 6. if Respondent should ever apply or reapply for a new license or certification, or petition for reinstatement of a license, by any other health care licensing agency in the State of 4 Stipuiated Surrender of License (Case No. 4346) .. . California. while Respondent believes theta signi?cant legal issue exists with respect to the statutory interpretation of Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, it acknox-yledges that Complainant established a prime Focie case for the all of the charges in Aoeosution No. 4346 end that those charges constitute cause for disoipline oil of the charges and allegations contained in Aceusetion, No. 4346 for the purpose of any Statement oF issues or any other proceeding seeking to deny or restrict 7. Respondent shall. within thirty (.30) days of the effective date of the Board?s order, arrange for the destruction oi} the to, sale of or storage in a facility licensed by the Board of all controlled substances and dangerous drugs and devices. Respondent shall further provide written prooi?of such disposition and submit a completed Discontinuance ofBusiness ionn according to Board guidelines. 8. Respondent may not apply. reapply. or petition for any licensure or registration ofthe Board for three years from the office-titre dete oi? the Decision end Order. ?31; 3. David Zeiger on behalf of Priority Pharmaceuticals, lno.. hove oarol?uil reed the show Stipulated Surrender of License and Order and have ftliiy discussed it with my attorney. John A. Cronin. iunderstand the stipulation and the effect it will have on my \t?holeseler License. On behol'ro?f rnyseltiono ReSpondem Priority lermaeeutieals, Inc.. lenier Into this Stiputoted Surrender of License and Order voluntarily. itnot-vingly. and intelligently. and agree to be bound by the Decision and Order of the Board of Pharmacy. DATED: x. as an indir] al at} agent on behalf of" 8 PHARMACEUTICALS. TN . Reapondent' V: Stipulated Surrender of License {Case No. 4346) 2'7 28 I have road and fully discussed. with Respondent David Zoiger the: terms and conditions and other matters contained ?in this Stipulate?d Sufrendei' of License and Ordor. Iapprovo its form? and content. DATED: x/a 3/.sz JOHN A. Attorney for Respondent END NT The foregoing Stipulatod Surrender of License and Ordor is horoby respectfully submitted for consideration by the Board ofPharmac-y of tho of Consumer Affairs. DATED: SF2012401790 71018663 .?docx {fags/4;? Respectfully submitted, KAMALA D, HARRIS Attorney General of California 612-30011? J. SALUTE Supervising. . uty Attorney Gonerai JONATHAN .LAF D: -. . Deputy may oneral Attorneys :?Com. Miriam Stipuiateci Surrender of License (Case No. 4346) . . . Exhibit A Accusation N0. 4346 - - -- KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California FRANK H. PACOE Supervising Deputy Attorney General JOSHUA A. ROOM Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 214663 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (41 5) 7034299 Facsimile: (415) 703-5480 Atromeysfor emplainam BEFORE THE BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Accusption Against: Case No. 43 46 PRIORITY PHARMACEUTICALS INC. 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd, Suite San Diego, CA 92121 DAVID ZEIGER, President, Pharmacist License No. RPH 26202 ACCUSATION Wholesaler License No. WLS 5145 and I JANET LEE MARSH 30842 Wisteria Circle Murrleta, CA 92563 Designated Representative No. EXC 17770 Respondents. Complainant alleges: PARTIES 1. Virginia Herold (Complainant) brings this Accusation solely in her of?cial capacity as the Executive Officer of the Board cfPharmaey (Board), Department of Consumer Affairs. 2. On or about December 3, 2007, the Board issued Wholesaler License No. WLS 5145 to Priority Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Respondent Priority). The License was in effect at all times relevant herein and will expire December 1,2012. unless renewed. Since on or about December 3, 2007, David Zeiger, Pharmacist License No. RPH 26202, has been President of Respondent Priority. Business and Professions Code section 4307 is applicable herein. 1 Accusation 3. On or about January 4, 2005, the Board issued Designated Representative License No. EXC 17770 to Janet Lee Marsh (Respondent Marsh). The License was in effect at all times relevant herein and will expire January 1, 2013, unless renewed. Since on or about December 3, 2007, Respondent Marsh has been Designated Representative in Charge for Respondent Priority. mm 4. This Accusation is brought before the Board of Pharmacy (Board), Department of Consumer Affairs, under the authority of the following laws. All section references are to the Business and Professions Code (Code) unless otherwise indicated. 5. Section 401 of the Code provides that the Board shall administer and enforce both the Pharmacy Law [Bus cf: Prof. Code, 4000 et seq.] and the Uniform Controlled Substances Act [Health Safety Code, 11000 et seq.]. 6. Section 4300(a) of the Code provides that every license issued by the Board may be suspended or revoked. 7. Section 118(1)) of the Code provides, in pertinent part, that the suspension, expiration, surrender, or cancellation of a license shall not deprive the Board of jurisdiction to proceed with a disciplinary action during the period within which the license may be renewed, restored, reissued or reinstated. Section 4402(e) of the Code provides that any non-pharmacist license issued by the Board may be canceled if not renewed within 60 days after expiration, and any license Canceled in this fashion may not be reissued but will instead require a new application to seek reissuance, STATUTORY AND REGULATORY PROVISIONS 8. Section 4301 of the Code provides, in pertinent part, that the Board shall take action against any holder of a license who is guilty of ?unprofessional conduct,? de?ned to include, but not be limited to, any of the following: The commission of any act involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or corruption, whether the act is committed in the course of relations as a licensee or otherwise, and whether the act is a felony or misdemeanor or not. Knowingly making or signing any certi?cate or other document that falsely represents the existence or nonexistence of a state of facts. A .. Accusation 43-14310 COCO-The violation of any of the statutes of this state, of any other state, or of the United States regulating controlled substances and dangerous drugs. (0) Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter or of the applicable federal and state laws and regulations governing pharmacy, including regulations established by theiboard or by any other state or federal regulatory agency. 9. Section 4043 of the Code, in pertinent pant, de?nes?wholesaler? to mean and include persoo who acts as a wholesale merchant, broker, jobber, costoms broker, reverse distributor, agent, or a nonresident wholesaler, who sells for resale, or negotiates for distribution, or takes possession of, any drug or device included in Section 4022." 10. Section 4160 of the Code in pertinent part, that a wholesaler license shall be required for a person or entity to act as a wholesaler, that every Wholesaler shall be supervised or managed by a Designated Representative in Charge, and that the Designated Representative in Charge shall be responsible for the Wholesaler?s compliance with state and federal laws. 11. Section 4126.5, Subdivision of the Code states: A pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: (1) A Wholesaler owned or under common control by the wholesaler from whom the dangerous drug was acquired. (2) The pharmaceutical manufacturer from whom the dangerous drug was acquired. (33) A licensed wholesaler acting as a reverse distributor. (4) Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care. A pharmacy furnishing dangerous drugs pursuant to this paragraph may only furnish a quantity suf?cient to alleviate the temporary shortage. (S) A patient or to another pharmacy pursuant to a prescription or as otherwise authorized by law. (6) A health care provider that is not a pharmacy but that is authorized to purchase dangerous drugs. (7) To another pharmacy under common control.? 3 --J. Accusation . .pmw 12. California Code of Regulations; title 16, section 1783, subdivision provides, in pertinent part, that a manufacturer or wholesaler shall not accept payment for, or allow the use of an entity?s credit to establish an account for, the purchase of dangerous drugs or devices from any person other than the ownerls) or eXecutive officerfs) listed on the permit, on a permit?s account. MM 13. Section 125.3 of the Code provides, in pertinent part, that the Board may request the administrative law judge to direct a licentiate found to have committed a violation of the licensing act to pay a sum not to exceed its reasonable costs of investigation and enforcement. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 14. For a period of time that included but was not necessarily limited to dates on and/or between lanuary 2009 and December 2011, Respondents were engaged in a business practice that involved the purchase of dangerous drugs from various pharmacies throughout California and the revsale of those dangerous drugs to wholesalers and pharmacies within and outside California. 15. During that time period, Respondents made purchases from at least (S 0) different California pharmacies, on at least ?ve hundred (500) occasions. Respondent Priority was not the wholesaler that had supplied the dangerous drugs to any of these phannacies. Over thirty?five (35) different dangerous were purchased from California pharmacies by Respondents. 16. During and/or prior to that time period, Respondents solicited pharmacies to supply Respondents with dangerous drugs that Respondents would identify to the pharmacies by daily, weekly, or occasional lists of dangerous drugs (with dosages and titled WE ARE LOOKING and/or ITEMS WE ARE INTERESTED At the direction and/or pursuant to the encouragement of Respondents, the pharmacies would acquire the dangerous drugs listed by Respondents, typically from the pharmacies? primary wholesaler(sj.' The drugs acquired by the client pharmacies would then be re?sold to Respondent Priority. 1 For the purposes of this Aocusation, ?primary wholesaler? refers to the wholesaler from which the pharmacy purchased the bull: of its dangerous drugs, andior with which the pharmacy enjoyed a contractual relationship giving the pharmacy an ?account? with the wholesaler. Most if not all pharmacies establish a ?pr'un'ary wholesaler? account relationship with a single wholesaler. The pharmacy is issued an account number to use in ordering from the primary wholesaler. 4 Accusation . .a the client pharmacies utilized by Respondents were community pharmacies, yet all or nearly all of the drugs that were purchased by these pharmacies and resold to Respondents were drugs primarily used in hospital or other urgent-care enviromnents. The client pharmacies were purchasing agents for Respondents, buying drugs for Respondents, not their own patients. None of the client pharmacies were licensed by the Board as wholesalers. l8. Respondents offered and/or paid the client pharmacies a premium, typically at least ten (10) percent over invoice (the price at which the pharmacy acquired the drug), plus shipping, 19. At least twenty (20) of the pharmacies eventually turned over their ordering privileges with their primary wholesaler(s) to Respondents, such that Respondents were able to just submit orders directly "to the primary wholesaler(s), using the client pharmacies? account information? 20. Respondents re-sold the drugs that were acquired from pharmacies to wholesalers and pharmacies within and outside California, often at a substantial markup. A sampling of over. ?fty (5 0) purchase and resale transactions reVealed an average markup of two hundred thirteen (213) percent, with individual transactions showing markups as high as 3166%, 3.255%, and 6363%. 21. Respondents re?scld a portion of the dangerous drugs acquired from pharmacies to other wholesalers. On at least one occasion, Respondents misrepresented and/or omitted such a resale or transfer. By way of a transaction on or about August 5, 2011,- Respondents invoiced a purchase of a dangerous drug from a Garfield Pharmacy, located in Beverly Hills, CA. However, the shipping. label that Respondents provided to Garfield Pharmacy for shipment of the drug to a customer located in Cord ova, TN represented that the shipment was coming not from Respondent Priority but from another wholesaler (Vital I-lealthcare LLC) located in Savannah, GA. CAUSES FOR DISCIPLINE, AS TO BOTH RESPONDENTS FIRST CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE (Acts Involving Moral Turpitude, Dishonesty, Fraud, Deceit, or Corruption) 22. Re8pondent(s) are each and severally subject to discipline under sectionls) 430] 4301(1), and/or 4160 of the Code, in that, as described in paragraphs 14 to 2] Respondent(s) committed acts involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or corruption. 5 Accusation .- -. secono chose son DISCIPLINE (Making or Signing Document(s) Faiser Representing Existence or Nonexistence ofFaets) 23. Respond?nds) are each and severally subject to discipline under section(s) 4301, 4301 and/or 4160 of the Code, in that, as described in paragraphs 14 to 21, Respondent(s) made or signed one or more certi?cates or other documents falsely representing the existence or nonexistence of a state of facts. THIRD CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE (Violation of 24. Respondent(s) are each and severally subject to discipline under section(s) 4301, 4301 4301(0), and/or 4160 of the Code, in that, as described. in paragraphs 14 to 21, Respondent(s) violated statutes of this state regulating controlled substances and dangerous drugs, and/or violated/attempted to violate, directly or indirectly, assisted in or abetted the violation of, or conspired to violate, the laws governing pharmacy, when Respondent(s) solicited, encouraged, assisted in, abetted, or conspired toward, transaction(s) violating section 4160 of the Code, in that the client pharmacies that purchased dangerous drugs on behalf of Respondent(s), andf or sold dangerous drugs to RespOndent(s) for resale, by so doing acted as unlicensed wholesalers. FOURTH CAUSE OR (Violation of Law(s)) 25. Respondent(s) are each and severally subject to discipline under section(s) 4301, 43010), 4301(0), and/or 4160 01" the Code, in that, as described in paragraphs 14 to 21, Respond-ent(s) violated statutes of this state regulating controlled-substances and dangerous drugs, and/or violated/attempted to violate, directly or indirectly, assisted in or abetted the violation of, or conspired to violate, the laws governing pharmacy, when Respondent(s) solicited, encouraged, assisted in, abetted, or conspired toward, transaction(s) violating section 4126.5 of the Code, by purchasing dangerous drugs from and/or on behalf of pharmacies under unauthorized conditions. Accusation L23 FIFTH onusa non DISCIPLINE (Violation of Law(s)) 26. RespOndent(s) are each and severally subject to diseipline under sectionls)? 4301, 4301(1), 4301(0), and/or 4160 ofthe Code, in that, as described in paragraphs 14 to 21, Respondent(s) violated statutes of this state regulating controlled substances and dangerous drugs, and/or violated/attempted to violate, directly or indirectly, assisted in. or abetted the violation of, or conspired to violate, the laws governing pharmacy, when Respondent(s) solicited, encouraged, assisted in, abetted, or conspired toward, transac-tioh(s) violating California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1783, subdivision by causing the purchase of dangerous drugs by one or more client pharmacies from a primary Wholesaler on a pharmacy account controlled by Respondents. i SIXTH CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE (Unprofessional Conduct) =27. Respondents are each and severally subject to discipline under section 4301 of the Code, in that the acts described in paragraphs 14 to 26 constitute unprofessional conduct. MEIR WHEREFORE, Complainant requests that a hearing be held on the matters herein alleged,- and that following the hearing, the Board of Pharmacy issue a decision: 1. Revoking or suspending Wholesaler License No. WLS 5145, issued to Priority Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Respondent Priority); 2. Revolcing or suspending Designated Representative License No. EXC 17770, issued to Janet Lee Marsh (Respondent Marsh); 3. Ordering Respondents to pay the Board the reasonable costs of the investigation and enforcement of this case, pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 125.3; 7 . Accusation -.. Taking such other and further act-tier: is deemed necessary DATED: ?f/H/fz 2401790 4057] ISMQC 'Mp- {4-4-61 VIRGI I HEROLD Executi a Of?cm' Board of Pharmacy . Department of Consumar Affairs State of California Complainant Accusation .u lr'v --.-.-- STATE OF CALIFORNIA KUNALU KEHKJHIV, uuvemor DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL AND VOCATIONAL STANDARDS CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY 30 VAN NESS AVE., ROOM 2100 SAN FRANCISCO 94102 INDICATE HERE WHERE YOU WILL APPEAR FOR EXAMINATION SAN FRANCISCO LOS ANGELES FEE $55.00 STOCKTON For Pharmacist Licensure Examination (Must be paid at time of filing . . . Not refundable) The filing of a false statement by an applicant is grounds for denial of the application, or revocation of any certificate issued as a result thereof. The filing of a false affidavit is a violation of the Penal Code ofCalifow-nia and is punishable as a felony. EIWVN Read Instruction Sheet Attached IPLEASE PRINT OR TYPEI 1. NAME OF APPLICANT: 2. Social Security No.: I 9% ID ZEI area 3. Residence Address; STREET AND NUMBER If; STATE ZIP CODE No. (You must notify the Board in writing of any ch 4. Date of Birth: 7. Height: 8. Was your name ever changed? Yes ?an. "Emit. How? 5. Age. Original Name Color hair 9 Afre You a (Ernie? 9 Yes 30 CI 6. Sex; I not?are you a aw permanentresi ent. Yes E) I color (If Yes, please submit letter of proof.) 10. Have you previously applied for examination in this State? Yes No 23/ If answer is Yes, give date - 11. Did you take the examination? Yes I: No If answer is Yes, give date .. 12. University, College or School of Pharmacy you attended: {Transcript of college record must be supplied.) NAME OF SCHOOL 0'0ng DATES ATTENDED DATE OF FROM 5 To GRADUATION DEGREE 13. In what States are you presently registered? I 14. Name and address of present employer: ADDRESS: STREET AND NUMBER TuLso/I/ ?Slr'a'r'amm'. . LENGTH-OE PRESENT EMPLOYMENT: CITY AMT $570.3 *15. Have you ever been expelled from a pharmacist licensure examination in any State? Yes [3 No an *16. Have you ever been charged with violation of any law of a foreign country, or with Yes No a violation of a U.S. Statute, a State Statute, or a local ordinance? *17. Have you ever been convicted for any offense? (You need not include any minor Yes No me? traffic violations for which a fine of $25.00 or less was imposed.) *18. Haye you ever been addicted to the use of Narcotics or Hypnotics? Yes No m/f 1?19. Have you ever been habitually intemperate in the use of Alcohol or other Drugs? Yes No ("Eff *20. Have you ever been under observation or tieatment for mental disorders? Yes No [E/f If the answer to Question NosYes, attach a state- ment giving full details.) 21; Have you ever been employed as a registered pharmacist in another State? Yes No If answer is Yes, complete the following: DATES :1 To NAME OF EMPLOYER (If applicant has been employed as a pharmacist in another State for one?year'f?or the Pharmacy Board of that State of one year or more active practice, or qualifying 1900 hours experience, may be filed in lieu of experience affidavits.) Those qualified by No. 21 need not complete No. 22. 22. When, where and by whom were you employed while attaining experience? {def in; ?12,135: ?6 DATES I . '7 a HRS. FROM NAME OF EMPLOYER [7 an 5 the?? .1 .. .33: . 399/54" is? 41924 6?7 graham I .9. tab U, Woe?J Team; 3 3 (Ch/rt; In what other States was this experience accepted? .. (If applicant has not practiced as a pharmacist in'ranothet State for tone year, or more, affidavits from employers, showing a minimum of_l'900 hours, experience will experience affidavits need not be filed prior to completion of the examination.) A 7 I hereby certify under pennity ofperjury' that i personally pompieted this application and that the statements and an- swers appearing heriro'n -,ere true :3sz correct. - hereby acknowiedge receipt of at copy of Rules lof Professional Conduct in compiionceniith Sec; of the B. P. CorieIf}. I d. Signed-and dated this dayof 19 I at chT-n . . I 1 Signature of hpplicant?\ .. . I My Commisaion E?pif'?s Ailrll 5, 1331 In: sum?cation is completed in any State other than California,- it must be SubScribed and sworn to before Notur Public. . .. *kit'kw'irki?i?k This wilt Serve to certify that! have examined the photograph attached to the front of this apptication form and it is a good iikenees of the person whose tingenarint impressions appear below and whose fingerprints appear on the two fingerprint cards prepared by me and.Which hear my signature. - . Further,? that examined the signatore of the applicant, appearing on this application form, and compared it with sig- natures Written in my presenCe on the fingerprin cards on which impressions were placed )n my pres ?103. The signatures are simiiar and appear?h written California State Board of Pharmacy BUSINESS, cousuusn sermch nvouoltslue sooner 1625 N. Market Blvd, N215. Sacramento. CA 95834 Phone (916) 574-7900 60Wh?? .osuadegsnowu .in. Fax [915) 674?8617 1 or] i of. lift)? mvw.pharmacv.ca.gov a r: gifts}! CHANGE OF ADDRESS FORM lit} 9. 3? (For Personal Licenses only) FAX to (916) 57445617 mail to the California State Board of Pharmacy at the above address. Ptease Print or Type Licensee Name: License Numberts): min/10 mart/Es Zo/?ga 2% is 22x Indicate below type of license(s) held: License Expiration Date{s) . Pharmacis harmacy Technician intern El Exemptee 6/ NEW ADDRESS OF RECORD: May be post office box, personal mailbox. business address. etc. This address is accessible to the public via the intemet. All Board mailings?license renewal applications, license renewals, newsletters, notices. etc?wilt go to this address. (See important information abdut your address of record below) Address: City. Stat, and Zip: an sued. Aw r. 72.. a m; RESIDENCE ADDRESS: M'st be listed if the address of record is??gi your/esidence address Address City. State and Zip F53 1 8 2 . - 0:3 f/r/F/ idnitl? ion onl Telephone number: important Information About Your Address of Record A licensee?s address of record is the address to which all licenses, permits. license renewal noti?cations. newsletters. other publications. and correspondence from the Board is mailed. This information is considered public information and is available to the public on the Board's Web site. This is the same information provided online by other health profession (physicians. dentists, therapists} regulatory boards, pursuant to the information Practices Act (Civil Code section 1798 el seq.) and the Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250 et seq.). You may verify your current address of record by using the -- - a- option on the boards web site. if you do not want your residence address be available to the public, you may use an alternate address. such as a post of?ce box number or a personal mailbox (PMS). However. it you change your address of record to a box number. you must also provide your residence address. which will not be available to the public. It you IlSt your business address as your addition of mould. remember that all moilingo from the Boord will so to that address. For some business addresses, receiving personal mail from the Board may be problematic. For example. if you are employed in a large hospital complex with several pharmacies. opportunities for lost mail could exist. Also. using a business address would require you to change your address of record with the Board every time you change your place of employment. iTM-ii (Rev. 7104] California State Board of Pharmacy 1625 N. Market Blvd. Suite 219. Sacramento. CA 95834 EGEI HI Phone (916) 574-7900 ?30 ARD A it 'Nsumeas AFFAIRS aoeavcv Fax (916) 574-8618 PH or: corrsumee AFFAIRS GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR.. m: on not I0 Aft September 28, 20II David Zeiger Re: RPH26202 Receipt no.: 80816 Dear David Zeiger: Your application for renewal has been received and cashiered. However, your renewal license is being HELD due to an incomplete renewal application. Please complete items I and 2 below: CONVICTIONS and LICENSE DISCIPLINE: Since you last renewed year?Ii nse, have you had any license disciplined by a government agency or other disciplinary body; or, have you been convicted of an rim any state, the USA and its territories, military court or a foreign country? YES 2. CERTIFICATION: I deolar - laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and orreoy 0 0A r" We 6 0/4/ at SJ wSignature i 1030? Return this letter to the above address as soon as possible. Failure to respond with in 30 days will reSult in action by the board. Upon receipt of the above information, your renewal application will be processed. IF YOUR LICENSE HAS EXPIRED, YOU MAY NOT ENGAGE IN ANY PRACTICE WHERE A VALID AND ACTIVE LICENSE ISSUED BY THE BOARDIBUREAU IS REQUIRED UNTIL THIS FORM IS COMPLETED AND RETURNED. You must respond if you have had any license disciplined by a government agency or other disciplinary body; or a conviction(s) whether a misdemeanor, felony, or infraction over $300 or involving alcohol or a controlled substance. You must include pleas of no contest and any convictions that were subsequently set aside or deferred pursuant to Sections or 1203.4 of the Penal Code. If you responded to Item 1 above, in order to assist the Board/Bureau in determining what, if any, action need be taken against your license, please provide the following documents to the Board/Bureau within 30 days from receipt of this letter (they need not be sent with this form) for each conviction or disciplinary action since you last renewed your license. Please include your license number on any correspondence with the Board/Bureau. I. A detailed written explanation describing the circumstances and events that led to your lic'ense discipline, arrest(s) and conviction(s). 1. Documents relating to your license discipline or disciplinary actions taken against any other license by a government agency or disciplinary body. 2. Certi?ed documents relating to the arrest, such as: police report, arrest report, booking report, complaint, citation or ticket. 3. Certified Court documents, such as: Notice of Charges, Complaint, or Indictment; Plea Agreement, Sentencing Order, Probation Order, or Judgment; Dismissal, Probation Release, or Court Discharge. 4. Related mitigating evidence or evidence of rehabilitation. Please provide the requested documentation to the address above within 30 days from the date of receipt of this letter, Upon receipt and review of this documentation, the Board/Bureau will determine what, if any, action will be taken against your license. Sincerely, Renewal Cashier JNJUMEK SLR V1 CES AGENCY Pete Wilson, Governor ?Wmu CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY (?wimm 400 STREET, SUITE 4070, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 A??airg TELEPHONE: (916] 445-5014 March 15, 1994 To: Hawaii State Board of Pharmacy 0 BOX 3469 HONOLULU, HI 96801 Re: DAVID ZEIGER I hereby certify that David Zeiger was issued Pharmacist Registration Number RPH 26202 on 07/15/69 to practice pharmacy in California. Said registration is in good standing and will expire on 08/31/95. Additionally, Hr. Zeiger completed an approved internship of at least 1,500 hours in accordance with the requirements of the California State Board of Pharmacy. Sincerely, MW PATRICIA F. HARRIS Executive Officer cc: file l7A?37 (Rev. 3/93) Lil-'31 IL. 3935 February 8th, 1994 1,523,753 First Avenue A San Diego - . California State Board of Pharmacy California 400 street, Suite #4070 (its M1m?0? Sacramento, CA. 95814 Dear Sirs: 533-2290 I wish to request a verification letter that is to be Fm:mg sent to the Hawaii Board of Pharmacy. Both my pharmacy wa?ma license for Priority Pharmacy and our pharmacists' licenses need to be verified. My current list of pharmacists are: Thomas Seela #38902 Steve Pattison #39951 David Erounfelter #26069 DaVidEZeiger #262027 Enclosed is a copy of the letter from the Hawaii Board of Pharmacy with the verification requirements. Also enclosed is a check for $20.00 to cover the costs of the verification letters as required by the California Board of Pharmacy. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 619?688?2222. Sincerely, Que/M Thomas R. Seela, B. Ph. Pharmacy Manager 3935 FHstAvenue San Diego California 92103-3015 Teiz?ig 588-2290 Faxz?ig 688?0753 3' i . . Pharmacy Health Center September 1, 1993 Board of Pharmacy 400 Street Suite 4070 Sacramento, CA 95814-6200 To Whom It May Concern: For your records, please indicate that my address has changed. MY new address is: David C. Zeiger Wi 7k:- Thank you for your cooperation. 7f?ff Sincerely David C. Zei? President and CEO ?f/A?i?w DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL AND VOCATIONAL STANDARDS 1 9 PHARMACEUTICAL EXPERIENCE AFFIDAVIT An applicant for registration as a Licentiate in Pharmacy in California must ?le with the Board of Pharmacy satis- factory evidence that he/she had 1900 hours or more of practical experience. (Sections 40 87 and 4088 of the Business and Professions Code.) See back of this form for further instructions. To: The Credentials Committee of the CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY This is to certify that . 2 3 was employed under the supervision Name Age of a registered pharmacist during the time set forth, as follows: - 532. .. ?ll?19W From: L3 8 To: Number of Hours (fang/1L VALUE 0 . -. a sea QP Ken-L ?7 I $583?? 3?1630 I Address of Pharmacy Murmur; car I Certify, under penalty of perjury, that all statements given herein are true, and that to the best of my knowledge the experience thus gained by this applicant has been predominantly related to the practice of pharmacy, as required by lasiir'. [f mtonL 3 o. a, ?tm/ 0? 7 Name of Registered Pharmacist Certi?cate Number Date This is to certify that DEMO 2 El Pk 2?3 was employed 1under the supervision of a . Name ASE I a i i I registered pharmacist during the time set?forth, as follows: From: To: Number of Hours esters? Fix Pee-ruse): at; (w - ?mgdilrvr?lgu 3mg Name of Phat-mac ddress of karma: ,7 . Esme, cam. . A . . wit-ii: I Certify, under penalty of perjury, that all statements given herein are true, and that to the best of my knowledge the experience thus gained by. this applicant has been predominantly related to the practice of pharmacy, as required by law. Leia @344 22m 34/ ?ame of Registered Pharmacist Certi?cate Number Date Attach supplemental sheet if more space is needed 1. 2. EVALUATION OF PHARMACEUTICAL EXPERIENCE Rule and Regulation 1728. Full time is granted for the following: (1) Pharmaceutical experience attained after registration as an intern pharmacist and in compliance with Section 4087 of the Business and Professions Code; (2) Experience attained in compounding prescriptions under the direct supervision of a registered pharmacist as provided in Section 4087 of the Business and Professions Code after completing at least 60 units in a college of pharmacy or department of pharmacy of a university recognized by the board; or (3) Experience attained under the direct supervision of a registered pharmacist as provided in Section 4087 of the Business and Professions Code in hospital pharmacies that ?ll prescriptions for patients after completing at least 60 units in a college of pharmacy or department of pharmacy of a university recognized by the board. Part-time credit allowed for the following: (1) Experience attained in army and navy hospital pharmacies - - - total armed services experiEnce not to exceed 950 hours credit. 2 Ex erience attained in harmacies ?llinCr less than 10 rescri tions er da - - - total time credited not to - exceed 47 5 hours. Experience attained, under the supervision of a registered pharmacist, in wholesale drug houses as de?ned in Section 4038 of the Business and Professions Code - - total time credited not to exceed 475 hours. (4) Experience attained, under the supervision of a registered pharmacist, in the manufacture of pharmaceutical preparations as de?ned in Section 4034 of the Business and Professions Code - tOtal time credited not to exceed 950 hours. i (S At least 950 hours of the required experience shall be in the compounding and dispensing of prescriptions and performing other duties as required by Section 4087 of the Business and Professions Code after the applicant has completed 60 semester hours of his professional educational program. if \Vorking as a sales clerk in departments of a drug store such as soda fountain sales, liquor or cosmetic sales, as a deliveryman 01? janitor does not constitute pharmaceutical experience.? (6) Section 4087. of rheBusinessand Professions Coder ?_?_Pharmaceutical experience: De?ned. Pharmacisutical experience constitutes service and experience in a pharmacy under the personal supervision of a registered pharmacist, and consists of service and experience predominately related to the selling of drugs, compounding physician?s prescriptions, preparing pharmaceutical preparations, and keeping records and making reports required under state and federal statutes. ?To be credited to the total number of hours required by Section 4088, this experienCe ?shall haVe been obtained in pharmacies and under cenditiOns set forth by rule or regulation of the board adopted in With the provisions of Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 11371) of Part I of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.? Section 4088 of the Business and Professions Code: ?Number of Hours in Pharmaceutical Year. A pharmaceutical year shall consist of not less than 1,900 clock hours of pharmaceutical experience as de?ned by Section 40 87.? 22915?752 7?69 2M 05F OF PROFESSIONAL AND VOCATIONAL STANDARDS 1 MU): An applicant for registration as a Licentiate in Pharmacy in California must ?le with the Board of Phermacy satis- factory evidence that he/she had 1900 hours or more of practical experience. (Sections 4087 and 4088 of the Ensures 1 - 1 anti Ptofeesmns Corie) See back of this 01m 1 1r further instructions. T3: The Credentials Committee 0 SF. a H. ., LALii?pnmm neutral OI: [:?Wt?um ibis 13 to certify that ll? Wei-4.5.1.5" lk- was employed unaei L15 EuiasL?rlt-Lu? Alumregistzied piaimeust during the ?me set as follows: [Jimmie #4 DRUES 8F . (its EBB RX FH?il?ml nrurnal irrnur H?l?lm ?m Mama. mummile PHUNE 624-5041 Certify, milder penalty of perjury, that all Statements given herein are true, and that to the best of my a I 7 ?7 /33 Ntmiber of Hours Address t?e egg-Etnnce tutu gatiea by tins applicant has been predoxmnantly related to the practl mangeif}; a? ?Elle/v. a Name of Registered Pharmaci? Certi?cate Number Eu: DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL AND VOCATIONAL STANDARDS PHARMACEUTICAL EXPERIENCE AFFIDAVIT MAY 1 An applicant for registration as a Licentiate in Pharmacy in California must ?le with the Board of Pharmacy satis? factory evidence that he/she had 1900 hours or more of practical experience. (Sections 4087 and 4088 of the Business and Professions Code.) See back of this form for further instructions. To: The Credentials COmmittee of the CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY This is to certify that l0 . 7. 3 Name Of 3 registered pharmacist during the time set forth, as follows: was employed under the supervision Age From: 37 To Number of Hours Nam?ciof Pharmacy . 419:, clear Oman; a; we, (an; r? Address of Pharmacy if I Certify, under penalty of perjury, that all statements given herein are true, and that to the best of my knowledge the experience thus gained by this appli . I I - 1? I I 55-14: /fQ?/ixn IE: f?iagwrm uu? wit?.- ant has been predominantly related to the practice of pharmacy, as required by law. ?am- may Nmeofaegl?a?uaphnmacm Certi?catIeNui-nbcr Date DEPARTMENT Ub? ANL) VULAILUNAL. alnhunwa a_ Fl. - PHARMACEUTICAL EXPERIENCE AFFIDAVIT An applicant for registration as a Licentiate in Pharmacy in California must ?le with the Board of Pharmacy satis- factory evidence that he/she had 1900 hours or more of practical experience. (Sections 4087 and 4088 of the Business and Professions Code.) See back of this form for further instructions. To: The Credentials Committee of the CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY This is to certify that 10 - was employed under the supervision N: me Age of a registered pharmacist during the time set forth, as follows: 7 <7 Iva-If; ?iers - -- From: :1 A To: ?1 fr Number of Hours 7:25 (film; Hir- i'fgf flirt)!" ?75, Mix? 1.7? .3/{59 347/ f??ixa, 7'5? t?fv' ?f?i {Name of Address of Piumacy I Certify, under penalty of perjury, that all statements given herein are true, and that to the best of my knowledge the experience thus gained by this applicant has been predominantly related to the practice of pharmacy, as required by lawRrg?'iercd Pharmacist Certi?cate Number Date California State Board of Pharmacy 400 Street. Suite 4070, Sacramento. CA 95814 'Phone (916) 445-5014 Fax (915) 327-6308 mww.pharmacy.ca.gov STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, GOVERNOR September 26, 2005 Laura Savage Priority Pharmacy 3935 First Ave San Diego, Ca 92103 RE: David Zeiger hereby certify that Pharmacist License Registration Number RPH 26202, held in the name of David Zeiger, was issued on July 15, 1969 to practice pharmacy in California. The license is in good standing and no adverse action has been taken against this license. This license expires on August 31, 2007. in addition, David Zeiger completed an approved internship of at least 1,500 hours in accordance with the requirements of the California State Board of Pharmacy. Sincerely, Patricia Harris Executive Officer via??1? (J A Office Technician cc: file 1/ ?alifornia State Board of Pharmacy STATE AND CONSUMER AGENCY 400 Street. Suite 4070. Sacramento, CA 95814 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS Phone (916) 4456014 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, GOVERNOR Fax (916) 327?6308 September 26, 2005 Laura Savage Priority Pharmacy 3935 First Ave San Diego, Ca 92103 RE: David Zeiger I hereby certify that Pharmacist License Registration Number RPH 26202, held in the name of David Zeiger, was issued on July 15, 1969 to practice pharmacy in California. The license is in good standing and no adverse action has been taken against this license. This license expires on August 31, 2007?. In addition, David Zeiger completed an approved internship of at least 1,500 hours in accordance with the requirements of the California State Board of Pharmacy. Sincerely, Patricia l-larris Executive Officer spa-H. ti ii i l: 0:31 AmberCFb?s'by OfficeTechnician cc: file ?alifornia State Board Of Pharmacy STATE AND CONSUMER AGENCY 400 Street, Suite 4070. Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone (9'15) 445-5014 Fax (916) 327-6308 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER. GOVERNOR Julle, 2005 Laura Savage all Priority Pharmacy a 3935 First Ave San Diego, Ca 92103 \mbd 346823 RE: RPH 26202 Dear Licensee: 3 another state. This letter acknowledges receipt of your request for a veri?cation of your Pharmacist license to The fee for licensure veri?cation is $10.00 per veri?cation. Please submit the fee of$20.00 along with this letter. Please note that your request will not be processed until the licensure veri?cation fee has been received. If you have any questions regarding this matter, you may contact me at (916) 445?5014 ext. 4001. Slncerely, @ntDt? \(M?fi Amber Crosby I Of?ce Technician 3935 FHstAvenue San Diego CaHfornm 92l03?3015 Tet 619 688-2290 Fax:619 688-0753 July 4, 2005 California State Board of Pharmacy 400 Street, Ste. 4070 Sacramento, CA 95814 To Whom It May Concern: Hawaii State Board of Pharmacy requires the following information from you in order to renew our Hawaii State license: A certi?ed veri?cation that our Phannacist?in?charge, David Zeiger (license #26202), is in current and in good standing. Please include in the letter Mr. Zeiger?s license number and the expiration date. Please mail the letter to my attention at: Priority Pharmacy 3935 First Ave San Diego, CA 92103 Attn: Laura Savage Feel free to contact me at (619)688?2230 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Qwe? Wm Laura Savage Senior Manager, Operations Priority Pharmacy Californ'a State Baard 0f Pharmacy STATE AND colleen-lea ssRyIcss AGENCY 4130 Street. Sullc 4070. Sacramento. CA 95314 DEPMTMEMOF CONSUHER Phone i916) 4456014 Fax i915) 327-5395 ARwa mmoharmacvcaoov CHANGE OF ADDRESS FORM MAR 11% 2005 {For Personal Licenses only} Fax to (915) 327-8303. or 322-3561. 323?5743 Or mall to the California State Board of Pharmacy at the above address. F'leasa Print Licensee Name: License Numb-saris): Demo Zo-iars? RDH indicate below the type of linens-sis) held: License Expiration Dats(s) Pharmacist Er Pharmacy Technician Intern Examptee 8 [05! NEW ADDRESS 0E RECORD: May be post of?ce box. personal mailbox. business address. etc. This address is to the public Via the Internet. Board mailings?license renewal applications. license renewals. notices, std?wilt go to this address. [See important information about your address of record a ow Address: City. State and Zip: RESIDENCE ADDRESS: Must be listed if the address of record is not your residence address Address City. State and Zip ?9 Si?h?tme oi licensee (7 De of Date of Birlh (for purposes of only) . [Telephone number: Important information About Your Address of Record A licensees address Of record is the address to which all licenses, permits. license renewal noti?cations. other publications. arid correspondence from the Board is mailed. This information is considered public information and is available to the public on the Board's Web site. This is the some information provided online by other health profession (physicians. dentists. therapists) regulatory boards. pursuant to the information Practices Act (Civil Code section 1198 et seq.) and the Public Records Act {Goyemment Code section 6250 et seq.) You may tren?r year current address of record by using the License Veri?cation option on the board's web site. if you do not want your residence address be available to the public. you may use an alternate address. such as a 13051 Of?ce box number or a personal mailbox (PMS). However. if you change your address of record to a box number. you must also provide your residence address, which will hot be available to the public. it you list your business address as your address of record. remember that all mailings from the Board will go to that address. For some business addresses. receiving personal mail from the Board may be problematic. For example. if you are employed in a large hospital complex with several pharmacies. opportunities for lost mail could exist. Also. using a business address would require you to change your address of record with the Board every time you change your place of employment. i .. can that; we; C007 rill) 3935 First Avenue San Diego California 92103?3015 Tel: 619 688-2290 Fax: 619 688-0753 if gauge December 10, 1998 CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY 400 Street, Suite 4070 Sacramento, CA 95814-6200 RE: License #26202 To whom it may concern, Please be advised that my new residential address is? ?effective February 1, 1999. David C. Zeig r, President and GED. Sincer y, DCZ/mdk 3935 FHstAVBnue San Diego CalHornm 92103-3015 Tel:619 688-2290 Fax:619 in; E: Formerly Universily Pharmacy Heallh Cenler June 1, 1994 California State Board of Pharmacy 400 Street Suite 4070 Sacramento, CA 95814 To Whom it May Concern: Effectiv_e June 7, 1994 I will have a new home address: David C. Zeiger, Pharm D. #26202 Thank you for your time updating this item. Sincerely, David C. Zeig?r President and CEO r" BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49802 - Name, License No. GREENHOUSE PHARMACY, PHY 37814 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; cca, title 16, 1775; Bus. 8. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. 8: Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $12,600.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage subd. CONDUCT: I Nonucompliant Sales to a wholesaler- Greenhouse Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerdus drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Greenhouse Pharmacy located at 1516 Noriega Street in San Francisco, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121.- Greenhouse Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short suppiy they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Greenhouse Pharmacy gave their McKesscn account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Greenhouse Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Greenhouse Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 8/15/2011 1 PRIORITY $935.00_ 8/16/20" 2 PRIORITY $1123.38 8/25/2011 3 PRIORITY $198.59 8/29/2011 4 PRIORITY $644.76 8/302011 5 PRIORITY $325.41 8/31/2011 6 PRIORITY $71.83 9/1/2011 7 PRIORITY $820.40 9/13/2011 8 PRIORITY $426.09 9/15/2011 9 PRIORITY $210.04 9/27/2011 10 PRIORIH $632.81 9/29/2011 11 PRIORITY $421.88 9/29/2011 12 PRIORITY $76.48 $5,886.67 This is a violation of pharmacy law I - Ir\l BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49803 Name, License No. CARE RITE INC, PHY 37811 JURISDICTION: Bus. 8: Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $18,500.00 subd. CONDUCT: Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Care Rite Inc was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Care Rite Inc located at 3500 East Broadway in Long Beach, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Care Rite Inc did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shertage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Care Rite Inc gave their AmeriSource Bergen account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Care Rite Inc knowing what was being ordered. Care Rite Inc depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO AMOUNT 5/31/2011 1 PRIORITY $565.05 6/3/2011 2 PRIORITY $691.58 6/9/2011 3 PRIORITY $177.88 6/15/2011 4 PRIORITY $219.61 6/16/2011 5 PRIORITY $108.78 6/22/2011 6 PRIORITY $103.96 6/29/2011 7 PRIORITY $76.05 7/8/2011 8 PRIORITY $327.20 7/13/2011 9 PRIORITY $101.39 7/25/2011 10 PRIORITY $420.12 7/25/2011 11 PRIORITY $202.30 8/3/2011 12 PRIORITY $550.07 8/8/2011 13 PRIORITY $93.16 8/11/2011 14 PRIORITY $141.95 8/23/2011 15 PRIORITY $154.37 8/29/2011 16 PRIORITY $33.17 9/1/2011 17 PRIORITY $317.22 9/8/2011 18 PRIORITY $176.06 $4,459.92 This is a=~violation of pharmacy law. 1 .. i [Eli-Jul BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49804 Name, License No. STUDIO CITY DRUGS, PHY 50263 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 subd. Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $22,650.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: . Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? Studio City Drugs was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Studio City Drugs located at 11709 Ventura in Studio City, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Studio City Drugs did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Studio City Drugs gave their Amerisource Bergen account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs on the pharmacy?s behalf. Studio City Drugs depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE 6/27/2011 6/27/201 1 6/30/2011 7/7/2011 7/8/2011 7/11/2011 7/14/2011 7/15/2011 7/18/2011 7/26/2011 7/29/2011 8/1/2011 8/1/2011 8/2/2011 8/4/2011 8/10/2011 8/12/2011 INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT PRIORITY $73.39 PRIORITY $113.41 PRIORITY $152.23 PRIORITY $493.90 PRIORITY $57.24 PRIORITY $855.47 PRIORITY $433.84 PRIORITY $117.15 PRIORITY $959.53 PRIORITY $39.28 PRIORITY $109.08 PRIORITY $1,440.12 PRIORITY $2,533.63 PRIORITY $764.48 PRIORITY $4,863.01 PRIORITY $2,077.87 PRIORITY $22.94 8/15/2011 18 8/23/2011 19 PRIORITY 8/25/2011 20 PRIORITY 9/7/2011 21 PRIORITY This is a violation of pharmacy law $115.64 $767.16 $272.70 $92.23 $16,354.30 CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF 322.650.0121 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number CI 2011 49805 Name, License No. TORMED PHARMACY INC, PHY 42192 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. 3. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $11,600.00 CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Tormed Pharmacy Inc was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that oculd result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Tormed Pharmacy Inc located at 3440 West Lomita in Torrance, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal, Mckesson and/or HD Smith, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Tormed Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Tormed Pharmacy gave their account numbers for Cardinal, Mckesson and HD Smtih to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Tormed Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Tormed Pharmacy inc depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would resUlt in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/25/2011 1 PRIORITY $350.66 8/1/2011 2 PRIORITY $374.42 8/5/2011 3 PRIORITY $51.55 8/15/2011 4 PRIORITY $907.43 8/24/2011 5 PRIORITY $177.64 8/26/2011 6 PRIORITY $2,195.89 9/7/2011 7 PRIORITY $99.36 9/19/2011 8 PRIORITY $205.57 9/20/2011 9 PRIORITY $1,024.65 9/27/2011 10 PRIORITY $504.46 9/30/2011 11 PRIORITY $56.52 $5,948.15 This is a violation of pharmacy [aw BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number CI 2011 49806 Name, License No. PLAZA PHARMACY, PHY 47151 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus..& Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $12,650.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage subd. CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- Plaza Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Plaza Pharmacy located at 2220 Plaza in National City, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal Health, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd., Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Plaza Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Plaza Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 5/31/2011 1 PRIORITY $324.20 6/2/2011 2 PRIORITY $83.20 6/6/2011 3 PRIORITY $98.30 6/8/2011 4 PRIORITY $638.40 6/22/2011 5 PRIORITY $357.15 7/1/2011 6 PRIORITY $15.76 7/6/2011 7 PRIORITY $205.17 7/7/2011 8 PRIORITY $58.62 7/13/2011 9 PRIORITY $188.56 7/18/2011 10 PRIORITY $24.90 7/21/2011 11 PRIORITY $2,743.29 7/28/2011 12 PRIORITY $801.99 8/16/2011 13 PRIORITY $290.25 8/31/2011 14 PRIORITY $94.57 9/15/2011 15 PRIORITY $67.10 9/21/2011 16 PRIORITY $283.50 $6,274.96 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ISSUED 0N: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINEIS): 512.650.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49813 Name, License No. LOS ALTOS PHARMACY AT EL CAMINO HOSPITAL, PHY 50153 JURISDICTION: Bus. 8: Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $13,325.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage subd. CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Los Altos Pharmacy At El CaminO Hospital Inc was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Los Altos Pharmacy At El Camino Hospital Inc located at 2500 Grant Rd Ste 1B20 in Mountain View, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Los Altos Pharmacy At El Camino Hospital Inc did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Los Altos Pharmacy gave their McKesson account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Los Altos Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Los Altos Pharmacy At El Camino Hospital Inc depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/21/2011 1 PRIORITY $2,078.08- 7/25/2011 2 PRIORITY $4,552.22 8/10/2011 3 PRIORITY $1,326.82 8/19/2011 4 PRIORITY $217.73 8/25/2011 5_ PRIORITY 8/31/2011 8 PRIORITY $1,840.79 9/7/2011 7 PRIORITY $820.40 9/19/2011 8 PRIORITY $420.17 9/21/2011 9 PRIORITY $112.50 9/27/2011 10 PRIORITY $426.11 9/30/2011 11 PRIORITY $73.71 10/3/2011 12 PRIORITY $99.43 $12,124.48 This is a violation of pharmacy law. BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49815 Name, License No. Santa Clara Drug ?The Compounding Shop?, PHY 39079 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 subd. Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $11,750.00 CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Santa Clara Drug'The Compounding Shop' was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Santa Clara Drug'The Compounding Shop' located at 2453 Forest Avenue in San Jose, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen and Cardinal Health, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Santa Clara Drug'The Compounding Shop' did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to Specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Santa Clara Drugs gave their AmeriSource Bergen account number and Cardinal Health account number# to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Santa Clara Drugs knowing what was being ordered. Santa Clara Drug'The Compounding Shop' depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/18/2011 PRIORITY $130.63 7/25/2011 PRIORITY $1,375.03 8/2/201 1 PRIORITY $499.47 8/4/201 1 PRIORITY $1,213.31 8/8/201 1 PRIORITY $1,144.89 8/10/2011 PRIORITY $787.41 8/31/2011 PRIORITY $221.19 9/1/2011 PRIORITY $272.70 9/22/201 1 PRIORITY $635.40 9/22/2011 PRIORITY $230.00 9/26/2011 PRIORITY $783.00 $7,293.03 This is a violation of pharmacy law. .- m. . .. I II. 2312-.11.: q?Iftawn-nu: . n- -. ENin Pr ?n air} 1 1 . 1M3 .. BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number CI 2011 49833 Name, License No. BONITA PHARMACY, PHY 21603 JURISDICTION: Bus. 8: Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $11,900.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Bus. Prof. Code Records of Dangerous Drugs and $1,000.00 4081/Bus. Prof. Code Devices Kept Open for Inspection; 4332 Maintenance of Records, Current Inventory/Maintaining Prescriptions, Other Drug Records on Premises, Open to Inspection; Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Bonita Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Bonita Pharmacy located at 4190 Bonita Rd Ste 101 in Bonita, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from McKesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Bonita Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was? acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Bonita Pharmacy gave their McKesson account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Bonita Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Bonita Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/12/2011 1 PRIORITY $179.51 7/18/2011 2 PRIORITY $790.76 7/21/2011 3 PRIORITY $685.74 8/5/2011 4 PRIORITY $1,501.49 8/9/2011 5 PRIORITY $570.94 8/10/2011 6 PRIORITY $112.50 8/15/2011 7 PRIORITY $564.03 8/24/2011 8 PRIORITY $143.66 8126/2011 9 PRIORITY $2289.09 9/13/2011 10 PRIORITY $72.50 9/15/2011 12 PRIORITY $221.74 $7131.96 This is a violation of pharmacy law. Non-Compliant Record Keeping. Bonita Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Profession Code section 4081 subd. which states all records of manufacturer of sale, acquisition or disposition of dangerous drugs or dangerous devices shall be at all times during business hours open to inspection by?authorized of?cers of the law, and shall be preserved for at least 3 years from the date of making and Business and Professions Code section 4332 which states any person who fails, neglects, or refuses to maintain the records required by Section 4081 or who, when called upon by an authorized officer or a member of the Board, fails, neglects, or refuses to produce or provide the records within a reasonable time, or who willfully produces or furnishes records that are false, is guilty of a misdemeanor.. Specifically, Bonita Pharmacy located at 4190 Bonita Rd Ste 101 in Bonita, CA did not provide invoice 7, dated 8/15/2011, for $564,03 sold to to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. This is a violation of pharmacy law. IE: I - 5 E- gig: a L'afr.? {:1.1. .1 (E453 J. 5:511BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49840 Name, License No. ALUM ROCK PHARMACY, PHY 49179 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $4,500.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- Alum Rock Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy 0r wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Alum Rock Pharmacy located at 1855 Alum Rock Ave Ste A in San Jose, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical. Alum Rock Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Alum Rock Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/30/2011 1 PRIORITY $10,516.17 7/25/2011 2 PRIORITY $272.65 7/28/2011 3 PRIORITY $663.41 $11,452.23 CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINEISI: $4500.00 PAYMENT OF FINEISI DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Name, License No. APOTHECARY PHARMACY INC, PHY 49303 Citation Number CI 2011 49841 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $9,325.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or - alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Apothecary Pharmacy Inc was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Apothecary Pharmacy Inc located at 1500 Southgate Ave Ste 109 in Daly City, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Apothecary Pharmacy Inc did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Apothecary Pharmacy gave their McKesson account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Apothecary Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Apothecary Pharmacy Inc depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 8/25/2011 1 PRIORITY $298.25 7/29/2011 2 PRIORITY $51.03 8/30/2011 3 PRIORITY $252.79 9/13/2011 4 PRIORITY $466.82 9/19/2011 5 PRIORITY $512.06 9/27/2011 6 PRIORITY $544.47 9/30/2011 7 PRIORITY $68.17 10/3/2011 8 PRIORITY $203.37 10/10/2011 9 PRIORITY $183.06 $2,580.02 This is a violation of pharmacy law . - - I Warm. ?wok-3 3 5- fl 1. 1' lug]: shrink. IE .12? BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49842 Name, License No. CORNER DRUG COMPANY INC, PHY 44726 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $5,425.00 CONDUCT: Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler; Corner Drug Company Inc was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Corner Drug Company Inc located at 602 Main St in Woodland, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from McKesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Corner Drug Company Inc did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Corner Drug Company Inc depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: This is a violation of pharmacy law INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 5/11/2011 1 PRIORITY $913.50 6/10/2011 2 PRIORITY $1,657.50 7/25/2011 3 PRIORITY $2,018.38 7/25/2011 4 PRIORITY $2,406.69 7/25/2011 5 PRIORITY $1,562.62 7/28/2011 6 PRIORITY $663.41 $9,222.10 CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINEISI: $5,425.00 PAYMENT OF FINEISI DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49843 Name, License No. EVERGREEN PHARMACY, PHY 48826 JURISDICTION: Bus. 8; Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,250.00 AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Evergreen Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. Which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Evergreen Pharmacy located at 2690 White Rd Ste 200A in San Jose, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Evergreen Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Evergreen Pharmacy gave their Mckesson account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Evergreen Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Evergreen Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 8/25/2011 1 PRIORITY $193.59 8/29/2011 2 PRIORITY $644.76 9/13/2011 3 PRIORITY $426.09 9/19/2011 4 PRIORITY $390.56 9/22/2011 5 PRIORITY $244.40 $1,904.40 This is a violation of pharmacy law. 1- - H: nigh". u: ..-- 3-4 rift-L; l? brewer/1324,2012? BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49844 Name, License No. LAUDEN PHARMACY, PHY 43209 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $27,175.00 CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? Lauden Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Lauden Pharmacy located at 1820 41St Avenue Suite in Capitola, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical, located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Lauden Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Lauden Pharmacy gave their AmeriSource Bergen account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Lauden Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Lauden Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing? the shortage on the following dates and invoices: Date INVOICE WHLSE AMOUNT COMMENTS 8/1/2011 1 PRIORITY $231.22 8/4/2011 2 PRIORITY $464.20 8/10/2011 3 PRIORITY $249.38 8/26/2011 4 PRIORITY $132.66 8/30/2011 5 PRIORITY $12.90 9/1/2011 6 PRIORITY $272.70 9/21/2011 7 PRIORITY $212.96 10/6/2011 8 PRIORITY $143.10 10/26/2011 9 PRIORITY $181.97 10/27/2011 10 PRIORITY $114.51 10/27/2011 11 PRIORITY $120.35 11/1/2011 12 PRIORITY $332.24 11/3/2011 13 PRIORITY $334.31 11/7/2011 15 PRIORITY $3,256.04 11/10/2011 17 PRIORITY $276.40 11/10/2011 18 PRIORITY $483.62 11/14/2011 19 PRIORITY $1,400.74 11/15/2011 20 PRIORITY $1.117.44 11/18/2011 21 PRIORITY $454.40 11/21/2011 22 PRIORITY $2,661.04 11/22/2011 23 PRIORITY $769.38 11/30/2011 24 PRIORITY $476.24 11/30/2011 25 PRIORITY $1,243.38 11/30/2011 26 PRIORITY $540.84 12/5/2011 27 PRIORITY $262.02 12/14/2011 28 PRIORITY $715.05 $16,459.09 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINEISI: $27.175.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Name, License No. Cl 2011 49845 THE MEDICINE SHOPPE, PHY 44931 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $4,400.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. The Medicine Shoppe was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangeroUs drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, The Medicine Shoppe located at 282 Village Square in Orinda, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal Health, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. The Medicine Shoppe did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition The Medicine Shoppe gave their Cardinal Health account number #12074 to Priority and authorization to order drugs without The Medicine Shoppe knowing what was being ordered. The Medicine Shoppe depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate Specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS . AMOUNT 8/8/2011 1 PRIORITY $2,375.06 8/29/2011 2 PRIORITY $526.04 9/6/2011 3 PRIORITY $288.64 9/21/2011 4 PRIORITY $584.55 $3,774.29. This is a violation of pharmacy law. BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Name, License No. Cl 2011 49846 FAAST PHARMACY, PHY 47454 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $8,225.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? Faast Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Faast Pharmacy located at 3400 Calloway Dr #701 in Bakersfield, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal Health, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Faast Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Faast Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/8/2011 1 PRIORITY $652.70 6/14/2011 2 PRIORITY $264.00 6/15/2011 3 PRIORITY $93.50 6/23/2011 4 PRIORITY $130.79 6/23/2011 5 PRIORITY $343.73 7/6/2011 6 PRIORITY $130.68 7/18/2011 7 PRIORITY $243.43 8/1/2011 8 PRIORITY $275.69 $2134.52 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINEISI: $8225.00 PAYMENT OF FINEISI DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49847 Name, License No. KERN AVENUE PHARMACY, PHY 46646 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $4,650.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: I Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Kern Avenue Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Kern Avenue Pharmacy located at 205 Kern Ave in Mc Farland, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Kern Avenue Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Kern Avenue Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/9/201 1' 1 PRIORITY $119.56 6/9/2011 2 PRIORITY $621.73 6/30/2011 3 PRIORITY $255.07 7/5/2011 4 PRIORITY $322.07 7/11/2011 5 PRIORITY $131.77 7/19/2011 6 PRIORITY $12.62 $1,462.82 This is a violation of pharmacy law. BOARD OF PHARMACYV jg? DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE .. ties, x" in Name, License No. MANOR DRUGS, PHY 46920 Citation Number Cl 2011 49848 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. 8. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FI NE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $7,050.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- Manor Drugs was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Manor Drugs located at 5795 First St in Fresno, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them. to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd. Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Manor Drugs did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Manor Drugs depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would reSult in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO I. WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/12/2011 1 PRIORITY $276.49 7/12/2011 2 PRIORITY $220.87 7/12/2011 3 PRIORITY $73.59 8/5/2011 4 PRIORITY $691.41 8/5/2011 5 PRIORITY $25.23 8/9/2011 6 PRIORITY $69.22 8/15/2011 7 PRIORITY $215.39 8/18/2011 8 PRIORITY $122.62. 8126/2011 9 PRIORITY $1,076.74 $2,771.56 This is a violation of pharmacy law xi. .1 . .p-u 13.13.11}: Hat?ht 3.134745,- 9r?: -. .. .E BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Name, License NO. Cl 2011 49849 TEPLOW DRUGS, PHY 46890 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. 8. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Teplow Drugs was not in compliance-with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Teplow Drugs located at 404 Main St in Barstow, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd, Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Teplow Drugs did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Teplow Drugs depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial Of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 5/18/2011 1 PRIORITY $63.00 5/18/2011 2 PRIORITY $274.70 6/2/2011 3 PRIORITY $196.10 7/13/2011 4 PRIORITY $110.79 7/29/2011 5 PRIORITY $36.10 10/10/2011 6 PRIORITY $195.14 $875.83 This is a violation of pharmacy law. j' BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49850 Name, License No. YOUR DRUG STORE, PHY 30792 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 subd. Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $15,725.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- Your Drug Store was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Your Drug Store located at 2303 Niles Point in Bakers?eld, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd. Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Your Drug Store did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Your Drug Store depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE 5/31/201 1 6/3/201 1 6/9/201 1 6/14/201 1 6/27/201 1 6/30/2011 7/15/2011 7/19/201 1 7/29/2011 8/4/201 1 8/5/201 1 8/9/201 1 8/17/201 1 INVOICE WHOLESALERS AMOUNT PRIORITY $168.00 PRIORITY $111.10 PRIORITY $76.96 PRIORITY $47.03 PRIORITY $227.26 PRIORITY $1,326.82 PRIORITY $759.00 PRIORITY $1,429.89 PRIORITY $663.41 PRIORITY $1,285.35 PRIORITY $464.75 PRIORITY $946.00 PRIORITY $505.69 8/18/2011 14 PRIORITY $1,806.97 8/25/2011 15 PRIORITY $3,390.75 8/26/2011 16 PRIORITY $112.38 9/1/2011 17 PRIORITY $172.48 9/30/2011 18 PRIORITY $591.25 9/30/2011 19 PRIORITY $81.58 $14,166.67 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF 515325.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 .. BOARD OF PHARMACY STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49851 Name, License No. A A UNIVERSAL PHARMACY INC, PHY 47522 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. 3: Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $3,175.00 CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Universal Pharmacy was net in Compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Universal Pharmacy located at 866 Vermont Ave. #202 in Los Angeles, CA, did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from HD Smith, wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd, in San Diego, CA 92121. Universal Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Universal Pharmacy gave their account number for HD Smith to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Universal Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Universal Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 617/201 1 1 PRIORITY $1,165.30 6/9/2011 2 PRIORITY $496.60 7/14/2011 3 PRIORITY $26.16 $1,688.06 This is a violation of pharmacy law . Citation Number Cl 2011 49852 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Name, License No. BIXBY PHARMACY, PHY 46170 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. 8: Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,500.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage subd. CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? Bixby Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Bixby Pharmacy located at 3816 Woodruff Ave #108 in Long Beach, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from AmerisourceBergen a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd. in San Diego, CA 92121 and Optimal Pharmaceuticals located at 8406 Magnolia Ave. in Santee, CA 92071. Bixby Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority and Optimal Pharmaceuticals. Bixby Pharmacy depended on Priority and Optimal to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT COMMENTS SOLD TO 2 DIFFERENT 6/28/2011 1 PRIORITY $197.74 WLS 6/28/2011 2 PRIORITY $163.48 7/7/2011 3 PRIORITY $73.59 7/18/2011 4 PRIORITY $134.73 7/27/2011 5 PRIORITY $123.88 9/28/2011 103 OPTIMAL $520.40 10/5/2011 104 OPTIMAL $358.13 $1,571.95 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINES): $5500.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49854 Name, License No. BRISTOL FAMILY PHARMACY, PHY 50205 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code subd. 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,125.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- Bristol Family Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Bristol Family Pharmacy located at 1126 8 Bristol Street in Santa Ana, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered Pharmaceutical them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority ocated at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd. Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Bristol Family Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Bristol Family Pharmacy gave their AmerisourceBergen account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Bristol Family Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Bristol Family Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 8/4/2011 1 PRIORITY $274.97 8/9/2011 2 PRIORITY $210.30 8/11/2011 3 PRIORITY $96.17 8/25/2011 4 PRIORITY $270.17 9/6/2011 5 PRIORITY $282.86 $1,134.47 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINEISI: 35.125.00 PAYMENT OF FINEISI DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49855 Name, License No. PHARMACY, PHY 50040 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $3,125.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Burt's Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangeroUs drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Burt's Pharmacy located at 2333 Borchard Rd in Newbury Park, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Burt's Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Burt's Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the folloWing dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/18/2011 1 PRIORITY $481.73 7/26/2011 2 PRIORITY $39.28 8/5/2011 3 PRIORITY $650.03 $1,171.04 This is a violation of pharmacy law. BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Name, License No. CABRILLO PARK PHARMACY, PHY 50066 Citation Number Cl 2011 49857 JURISDICTION: Bus. 8. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $1 ,550.00 CONDUCT: Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Cabrillo Park Pharmacy was not in comp ?ance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Cabrillo Park Pharmacy located at 2212 4Th St #1 02 in Santa Ana, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Fri Pharmaceutical. Cabrillo Park Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the ority temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Cabrillo Park Pharmacy depended on Priority?to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO 7/25/201 1 1 WHOLESALERS AMOUNT PRIORITY $34.23 This is a violation of pharmacy law. a-aaiitJt-t-?ml lit-14* aw. a: if. tat-?3?15?! iris-1:: 9v 1. i- airs-a, . . ?13335'iv-lfL-I lumps IS: BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS . STATE OF CALIFORNIA A i. 3-.- CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49858 Name, License NO. CHEMIQUE PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, PHY 33091 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $1,550.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? Chemique Pharmaceutical Services was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary Shortage Of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the Shortage. Specifically, Chemique Pharmaceutical Services located at 13306 Whittier Blvd. in Whittier, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical. Chemique Pharmaceutical Services did not have independent knowledge Of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in Short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Chemique Pharmaceutical Services depended on Priority to identify the Shortages, know what quantity Of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary Shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the Shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO 6/7/2011 1 WHOLESALERS AMOUNT PRIORITY $110.50 This is a violation of pharmacy law 13Riga: . assimiu?sv BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Name, License No. Cl 2011 49859 PHARMACY, PHY 45918 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $2,075.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Pharmacy located at 1234 8 Garfield Ave No 102 in Alhambra, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical. Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 8/10/2011 1 PRIORITY $78.77 9/6/2011 2 PRIORITY $514.35 $593.12 This is a violation of pharmacy law. - - BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Name, License No. FOUNTAIN VALLEY MEDICAL CNTR PHY, PHY 37134 Citation Number Cl 2011 49861 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 16, 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $2,050.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Fountain Valley Medical Center Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Fountain Valley Medical Center Pharmacy located at 11100 Warner Ave in Fountain Valley, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley 'Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Fountain Valley Medical Center Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Fountain Valley Medical Center Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 712212011 2884,6005 PRIORITY $484.00 This is a violation of pharmacy law. BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49862 Name, License No. FOX DRUGS, PHY 35363 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 subd. Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $10,175.00 CONDUCT: Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler? Fox Drugs was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Fox Drugs located at 1327 El Prado in Torrance, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Fox Drugs did not have independent knoWledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Fox Drugs gave their Amerisource Bergen account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Fox Drugs knowing what was being ordered. Fox Drugs depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/14/2011 1 PRIORITY $73.59 6/16/2011 2 PRIORITY $183.39 6/22/2011 3 PRIORITY $40.40 6/30/2011 4 PRIORITY $73.59 7/8/2011 5 PRIORITY $259.84 7/13/2011 6 PRIORITY $123.41 7/25/2011 7 PRIORITY $410.78 7/29/2011 8 PRIORITY $121.51 8/16/2011 9 PRIORITY $70.85 9/6/2011 10 PRIORITY $279.72 $1,637.08 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $10,175.00 PAYMENT OF FINEISI DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Name, License No. GARDEN GROVE PHARMACY, PHY 48889 Citation Number CI 2011 49864 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $40,925.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- Garden Grove Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Garden Grove Pharmacy located at 12885 Garden Grove Ste 108 in Garden Grove, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Garden Grove Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Garden Grove Pharmacy gave their AmeriSource Bergen account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Garden Grove Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Garden Grove Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: Garden Grov 05/1712011 918334 $110.00 Leucovorin Garden Grov 05/17/2011 918335 $24.75 Papaverine 10ml Garden Grov 05/17/2011 918336 $68.75 Papaverine 10ml Garden Grov 05/17/2011 918337 $47.30 Hydralazine Garden Grov 03/17/2011 918338 $186.89 Phenylephrine Garden Grov 05/23/2011 918964 $49.45 Hydralazine Garden Grov 05/25/2011 919298 $19.55 cyanobalamine Garden 05/25/2011 919299 $17.25 Potassium phos Grov _G'arden . Grov 06/01/201 1 919869 $20.31 Garden Grov 06/01/2011 919870 $49.45 Hydralazine Garden Grov 05/26/2011 919473 $37.94 Epinephrine Garden Magnesium Grov 05/27/2011 919585 $29. 05 Sulfate Garden Grov 06/06/2011 930327 $71.99 Vasopressin Garden Grov 06/06/2011 920328 $28.75 Pitressin Garden Grov 06/06/2011 920326 $58.17 Hydralazine Garden Magnesium Grov 06/06/201 1 920329 $27.31 Sulfate Garden Grov 06/07/2011 920438 $192.63 Protamine Garden Grov 06/07/2011 920437 $215.63 Vasopressin Garden Grov 06/07/2011 920435 $51.75 Potassium phos Garden Grov 06/08/2011 920563 $1 ,642.66 Dexamethasone Garden Grov - 06/08/2011 920564 $1,172.31 Phenylephrine Garden Grov 06/13/201 1 920996 $57.39 L-Cysteine Garden . Grov 06/13/201 1 920997 $76.94 Hydralazine Garden . Grov - (36/14/2011 921121 $67.56 Sod Acetate Garden . Magnesium _Grov 06114/2011 921120 $27.31 Sulfate Garden . Grov 06/14/2011 921118 $40.25 Calcium Chloride Garden - Grov 06/15/2011 921236 $1,196.00 Amikacin Garden . Grov 06/21/2011 921810 $235.75 Zinc Chloride Garden Magnesium Grov 06/21/2011 921808 $27.31 Sulfate Garden Grov 06/29/2011 922593 $76.94 - Hydralazine Garden Grov 07/06/2011 923099 $49.45 Hydralazine Garden Grov 07/06/2011 923098 $169.05 Hydralazine $6,145.84 This is a violation of pharmacy law gig-21: rm, BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number CI 2011 49865 Name, License No. GARFIELD PRESCRIPTION PHARMACY, PHY 46072 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $7,425.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Bus. Prof. Code 4059.5 Who may order dangerous drugs or $500.00 devices CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler._ Gar?eld Prescription Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Gar?eld Prescription Pharmacy located at 9400 Brighton Way in Beverly Hills, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Garfield Prescription Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Gar?eld Prescription Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 8/1 /2011 1 PRIORITY $135.20 8/5/2011 2 PRIORITY $3,242.01 8/11/2011 3 PRIORITY $118.06 8/12/2011 4 PRIORITY $22.94 $319.97 8/25/2011 5 PRIORITY $90.18 9/7/2011 6 PRIORITY 10/3/11 7 PRIORITY $96.96 Total $4025.32 This is a violation of pharmacy law. Non-Compliant Delivery of Dangerous Drugs. Gar?eld Prescription Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4059.5 subd (3) which states except as otherwise provided in this chapter, dangerous drugs or dangerous devices may only be ordered by an entity licensed by the board and shall be delivered to the licensed premises and signed for and received by a pharmacist. Where a licensee is permitted to operate through a designated representative, the designated representative shall sign for and receive the delivery. Speci?cally, Gar?eld Prescription Pharmacy located at 9400 Brighton Way in Beverly Hills, CA sold Dangerous Drugs to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd. in San Diego. CA 92121 on invoice 2. dated Bf5l2011. But the shipping label provided by Priority Pharmaceutical Indicated it was shipped to David Reliance located at 9325 Rancho Park Road in Cordova, TN. The shipping label also indicated it was shipped from Vital Healthcare located at 11 E. Lathrop Ave. in Savannah, GA not Garfield Prescription Pharmacy. This is a violation of pharmacy law. . a: -ire-issuing?was?b?eiseaeviWALI- :J?l . at 1 .i-Jrer?e- - .5. Festivemiit FF- 1 . .. 1 ?iiJm-?ddm ides v: .3, 4n.- BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49867 Name, License No. . HOWARD DRUGS, PHY 42954 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $16,650.00 CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Howard Drugs was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. Which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a tempprary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Howard Drugs located at 5818 North Bell?ower in Lakewood, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Howard Drugs did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Howard Drugs gave their McKesson account number# to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Howard Drugs knowing what was being ordered. Howard Drugs depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/6/2011 1 PRIORITY $622.00 6/10/2011 2 PRIORITY $827.64 6/16/2011 3 PRIORITY $889.90 6/17/2011 4 PRIORITY $791.67 6/21/2011 5 PRIORITY $3,664.44 6/22/2011 6 PRIORITY $3,087.21 6/24/2011 7 PRIORITY $2433.00 7/6/2011 9 PRIORITY $1,367.29 7114/2011 10 PRIORITY $613.27 7/19/2011 11 PRIORITY $515.46 8/4/2011 12 PRIORITY $1,041.59 8/5/2011 13 PRIORITY $53.54 1:71 TI . Mr. 5; mm 1?3 ln. Fir El. "i{migrants-'5. I 1} {huh 1.5.933, This is a violation of pharmacy law. 8/8/2011 8/16/2011 15 PRIORITY 14 PRIORITY $42.57 $16.470.38 $520.80 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49868 Name, License No. KOVACS-FREY PHARMACY, PHY 48888 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $2,550.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? Kovacs-Frey Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Kovacs-Frey Pharmacy located at 2860 Artesia in Redondo Beach, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical. Kovacs-Frey Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Kovacs-Frey Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/25/2011 1 PRIORITY $185.87 8/3/2011 2 PRIORITY $126.57 $312.44 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $1550.00 PAYMENT OF FINEISI DUE BY: March 24.2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Name, License No. Cl 2011 49870 RANCHO PARK PHARMACY, PHY 50485 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $2,025.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- Rancho Park Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Rancho Park Pharmacy located at 10569 Pico in Los Angeles, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal Health, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Rancho Park Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Rancho Park Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/5/2011 1 PRIORITY $66.87 7/8/2011 2 PRIORITY $66.87 $133.74 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINEISI: $2,025.00 PAYMENT OF FINEISI DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number No Cl 2011 49871 SEA VIEW PHARMACY, 39198 Code 4005; con, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMT 0F Fug__ Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 subd. shortage Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary $3,100.00 CONDUCT: Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Sea View Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Sea View Pharmacy located at 665 Gamino de Los Mares #101 in San Clemente, CA, did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from AmerisourceBergen wholesaler, and resold them Priority Pharmaceuticals, located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd. in San Diego, CA. Sea View pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceutical to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Sea View Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of the dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage of the drugs on following dates and invoice numbers: 1. Invoice dated 5/13/2011 for a total of $552.30 2. Invoice dated 6/9/2011 for a total of $374.00. Note: quantity is 10 25 1ml of IPhenyI?ephrine single dose vials for a total of 450 vials. 3. Invoice 3, dated 6/21/2011 for a total of $53.02 This is a violation of pharmacy law. . .. .. ?vl-FBOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49872 Name, License No. DISCOUNT PHARMACY, PHY 34468 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $2,000.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? Simon's Discount Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Simon'S Discount Pharmacy located at 7256 Sunset Boulevard in Los Angeles, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from HD Smith, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Simon'S Discount Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Simon'S Discount Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE 6/ 1 8/201 1 7/9/2011 INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT PRIORITY $13.33 PRIORITY $31.00 $44.33 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINEISI: 52.000.00 PAYMENT OF FINEISI DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49873 Name, License No. SMC PHARMACY, PHY 50595 JURISDICTION: Bus. 8: Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. 8: Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 subd. Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $19,725.00 CONDUCT: Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler. SMC Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. Which states a pharmacy may fur?nish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesalerto alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, SMC Pharmacy located at 1908 Santa Monica Ste 4 in Santa Monica, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from HD Smith, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd. in San Diego, CA 90404. SMC Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition SMC Pharmacy gave their HD Smith account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without SMC Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. SMC Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT COMMENTS GAVE ACCESS TO PRIORITY TO 5/23/2011 1 PRIORITY $350.60 ORDER 6/14/2011 2 PRIORITY $421.58 6/15/2011 3 PRIORITY $427.90 6/17/2011 4 PRIORITY $179.32 6/20/2011 5 PRIORITY $82.20 6/22/2011 6 PRIORITY $74.97 6/24/2011 7 PRIORITY $207.77 7/12/2011 8 PRIORITY $84.87 8/15/2011 9 PRIORITY $269.33 8/24/2011 10 PRIORITY $222.20 8/31/2011 11 PRIORITY $558.90 $558.90 $184.28 $683.10 $1,024.65 TY TY TY TY mwmwil 234567 8/31/2011 9/ 1 4/201 1 9/15/2011 9/20/201 1 $652.05 $621.79 $393.9/21/2011 9/29/2011 9/30/2011 $47.50 $7,045.51 10/5/2011 This is a violation of pharmacy law. 5% m: 15:1 25m Hui-249131" 5.413BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49874 Name, License No. SUPER MARKET PHARMACY, PHY 36988 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $3,075.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? Super Market Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Super Market Pharmacy located at 6039 Florence in Bell Gardens, CA, did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal Health, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical. Super Market Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Super Market Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/21/2011 1874 PRIORITY $312.48 7/6/2011 1914 PRIORITY $82.28 7/11/2011 1918 PRIORITY $243.16 8/31/2011 1974 PRIORITY $28.02 $665.94 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ISSUED ON: February 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINEISI: $3.075.00 PAYMENT OF FINEISI DUE BY: MarCh 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Name, License No. Cl 2011 49875 TLC XPRESS PHARMACY, PHY 49837 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $7,325.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Bus. Prof. Code Records of Dangerous Drugs and $3,000.00 4081/Bus. Prof. Code Devices Kept Open for inspection; 4332 Maintenance of Records, Current InventorylMaintaining Prescriptions, Other Drug Records on Premises, Open to Inspection; CONDUCT: Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler. TLC Xpress Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, TLC Xpress Pharmacy located at 10810 Warner Ave Ste 3-4 in Fountain Valley, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from HD Smith and Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. TLC Xpress Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition TLC Xpress Pharmacy gave their HD Smith and/or AmeriSource Bergen account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without TLC Xpress Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. TLC Xpress Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 10/5/2011 7 PRIORITY $413.40 $413.40 And also: Date Invoice No. Wholesaler Amount 7/25/2011 1 Priority $173.83 8/15/2011 2 Priority $215.46 8/31/2011 3 Priority $186.30 9/6/201 1 4 Priority $390.77 9/15/2011 5 Priority $683.10 9/20/201 1 6 Priority $1,024.65 $2674.11 This is a violation of pharmacy law. Non-compliant Maintenance of Records for Dangerous Drugs. TLC Xpress Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4081 subd. which states: all records of manufacture and of sale, acquisition, or disposition of dangerous drugs or dangerous devices shall be at all times during business hours open to inspection by authorized officers of the law, and shall be preserved for at least three years from the date of making. And Business and Professions Code section 4332 which states: Any person who fails, neglects, or refuses to maintain the records required by Section 4081 or who, when called upon by an authorized of?cer or a member of the board, fails, neglects, or refuses to produce or provide the records within a reasonable time, or who willfully produces or furnishes records that are false, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Speci?cally, TLC Xpress Pharmacy located at 10810 Warner Ave Ste 3?4 in Fountain Valley, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from HD Smith and Amerisburce Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. TLC Xpress Pharmacy did provide the following invoices when requested by the Board: Date Invoice No.- Wholesaler Amount 7/25/2011 1 Priority $173.83 8/15/2011 2 Priority $215.46 8/31/2011 3 Priority $186.30 9/6/201 1 .4 Priority $390.77 9/15/2011 5 Priority $683.10 9/20/201 1 6 Priority $1 .024.65 $267.41 1 This is a violation of pharmacy law. Eight,- 3 :1 Es bru 5:12 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49876 Name, License No. UNIVERSITY CARE PHARMACY, PHY 50352 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $4,250.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler? University Care Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, University Care Pharmacy located at 5848 Santa Monica in Los Angeles, CA, did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical. University Care Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. University Care Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/27/2011 1 PRIORITY $528.88 7/6/2011 2 PRIORITY $1,823.05 8/5/2011 3 PRIORITY $48.36 8/24/2011 4 PRIORITY $42.14 9/13/2011 5 PRIORITY $121.44 $2,563.87 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $4250.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Name, License No. VALLEY VIEW REXALL DRUGS, PHY 9951 Citation Number Cl 2011 49878 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $16,625.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- Valley View Rexall Drugs was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Valley View Rexall Drugs located, at 13966 Valley View St in La Mirada, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen and HD Smith, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Valley View Rexall Drugs did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Valley View Rexall Drugs gave their Amerisource Bergen account number and HD Smith account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Valley View Rexall Drugs knowing what was being ordered. Valley View Rexall Drugs depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/11/2011 1 PRIORITY $887.82 7/12/2011 2 PRIORITY $39.38 7/13/2011 3 PRIORITY $978.24 7/20/2011 4 PRIORITY $85.44 7/25/2011 5 PRIORITY $105.03 7/25/2011 6 PRIORITY $171.53 8/10/2011 7 PRIORITY $93.16 8/26/2011 8 PRIORITY $112.51 8/26/2011 9 PRIORITY $298.49 9/6/2011 10 PRIORITY $535.28 9/13/2011 11 PRIORITY $183.71 9/14/2011 12 PRIORITY $1,015.34 9/15/2011 13 PRIORITY $221.49 9/20/2011 14 PRIORITY $1,024.65 10/4/2011 15 PRIORITY $168.14 10/5/2011 16 PRIORITY $213.74 $6,133.95 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION 0N: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FIN EIS): $16.625.00 PAYMENT OF FINEIS) DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49879 Name, License No. DRUG PHY 32490 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. 8: Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $23,125.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Vermillion's Drug #3 was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Vermillion's Drug #3 located at 1942 Anaheim St in Long Beach, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal Health, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Vermillion's Drug #3 did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them?. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Vermillion's Drug #3 gave their Cardinal Health account to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Vermillion's Drug #3 knowing what was being ordered. Vermillion'S Drug #3 depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 5/26/2011 1 PRIORITY $118.80 6/6/2011 2 PRIORITY $96.30 6/7/2011 3 PRIORITY $98.30 6/23/2011 4 PRIORITY $343.73 6/23/2011 5 PRIORITY $336.49 7/1/2011 6 PRIORITY $84.15 7/6/2011 7 PRIORITY $273.56 7/7/2011 8 PRIORITY $97.29 7/18/2011 9 PRIORITY $24.90 8/1/2011 10 PRIORITY $385.97 8/25/2011 11 PRIORITY $160.65 9/7/2011 12 PRIORITY $31.52 9/21/2011 13 PRIORITY $332.01 10/124/2011 14 PRIORITY $1,004.85 10/25/2011 15 PRIORITY $1,256.06 11/1/2011 16 PRIORITY $3,035.16 11/2/2011 17 PRIORITY $430.31 11/7/2011 18 PRIORITY $956.46 11/7/2011 19 PRIORITY $1,159.43 11/14/2011 22 PRIORITY $956.46 $11,182.40 This is a Violation of pharmacy law. 1? mgr-mags? m?fv?h .4 13-; Emma- fig-f. I 1 .9615:va MEI4?:qu In 79;" 17:42:51 f? gamut-4t,? lug/warm Isa. 424%. P-H . 951' gun-m a. I BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49881 Name, License No. WATERMAN PHARMACY, PHY 47424 JURISDICTION: Bus. 8: Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. 8: Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $17,475.00 CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Waterman Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Waterman Pharmacy located at 2150 Waterman Ave #104 in San Bernardino, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Waterman Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shOrtage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Waterman Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE 6/24/2011 6/15/201 1 6/30/2011 7/6/201 1 7/7/201 1 7/12/201 1 7/13/201 1 7/15/201 1 7/21/2011 7/25/2011 7/25/2011 7/26/2011 7/29/2011 8/5/201 1 INVOICE WHOLESALERS AMOUNT PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY . PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY PRIORITY $40.40 $237.59 $73.59 $75.26 $165.38 $795.38 $169.97 $3,816.93 $2,502.23 $70.02 $202.30 $70.37 $350.10 $133.92 .I 8/18/2011 9112/2011 9/13/201 1 9/27/201 1 8/10/2011 8/11/2011 This is a violation of pharmacy law. ?15tag/gain $500.35 $33.33 $134.37 $802.91 $146.19 $411.72 $694 40 $11,477.86 [um 1 . BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49882 Name, License No. COAST COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, PHY 47377 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. 8: Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $28,275.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Bus. Prof. Code 4059 furnishing of dangerous drug or device $1,000.00 subd. by a manufacturer, wholesaler, or under sales and purchase records that correctly give the date, the names and addresses of the supplier and the buyer, the drug or device, and its quantity Bus. Prof. Code 4301 Unprofessional Conduct - Assist in $3,000.00 subd. (0) violation CONDUCT: Nonecompliant Sales to a wholesaler- Coast Compounding Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage did n. Speci?cally, Coast Compounding Pharmacy located at 1838 Coast Hwy in Oceanside, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Coast Compounding Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Coast Compounding Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/6/2011 2830 PRIORITY $2,731.25 6/7/2011 2832 PRIORITY $3862.37 6/9/2011 2834 PRIORITY $93.28 6/9/2011 2835 PRIORITY $1,217.87 6/13/2011 2839 PRIORITY $484.55 6/14/2011 2840 PRIORITY $242.09 6/16/2011 2847 PRIORITY $1,880.73 6/20/2011 2850 PRIORITY $447.22 6/22/2011 2855 PRIORITY $207.15 6/29/2011 2860 PRIORITY $8,759.31 7/1/2011 2866 PRIORITY $1,953.27 7/5/2011 2868 PRIORITY $85.14 7/7/2011 2874 PRIORITY $1,706.65 7/18/2011 2889 PRIORITY $888.80 7/21/2011 2895 PRIORITY $1,026.56 7/26/2011 2902 PRIORITY $331.71 8/1/2011 2906 PRIORITY $189.95 8/3/2011 2910 PRIORITY $93.26 8/4/2011 2912 PRIORITY $1,347.76 8/12/2011 2924 PRIORITY $1,260.00 8/23/2011 2936 PRIORITY $323.57 9/9/201 1 2954 PRIORITY $272.70 9/14/2011 2962 PRIORITY $706.08 10/6/2011 2990 PRIORITY $1,917.67 10/11/2011 2997 PRIORITY $695.76 $32.724,70 This is a violation of pharmacy law Non-compliant Furnishing of Dangerous Drugs- Coast Compounding Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and, Professions Code section 4059 subdivision which states a person may furnish dangerous drugs by a manufacturer, wholesaler, or a pharmacy to each other or to a physician, dentist, podiatrist, optometrist, veterinarian, naturopathic doctor pursuant to Section 3640.7 under sales and purchase records that correctly give the date, the names and addresses of the supplier and the buyer, the drugs or device, and its quantity, Specifically, Coast Compounding Pharmacy located at 1838 Coast Hwy in Oceanside, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Coast Compounding Pharmacy did not have sales records the correctly give the quantity of the dangerous drugs on the following dates and invoices number: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/6/2011 2830 PRIORITY $2,731.25 6/7/2011 2832 PRIORITY $3,862.37 6/9/2011 2834 PRIORITY $93.28 6/9/2011 2835 PRIORITY $1,217.87 6/13/2011 2839 PRIORITY $484.55 6/14/2011 2840 PRIORITY $242.09 6/16/2011 2847 PRIORITY $1,880.73 6/20/2011 2850 PRIORITY $447.22 6/22/2011 2855 PRIORITY $207.15 6/29/2011 2860 PRIORITY $8,759.31 7/1/2011 2866 PRIORITY $1,953.27 7/5/2011 2868 PRIORITY $85.14 7/7/2011 2874 PRIORITY $1,706.65 7/18/2011 2889 PRIORITY $888.80 7/21/2011 2895 PRIORITY $1,026.56 7/26/2011 2902 PRIORITY $331.71 8/1/2011 2906 PRIORITY $189.95 8/3/2011 2910 PRIORITY $93.26 8/4/2011 2912 PRIORITY $1,347.76 8/12/2011 2924 PRIORITY $1,260.00 8/23/2011 2936 PRIORITY $323.57 9/9/2011 2954 PRIORITY $272.70 9/14/2011 2962 PRIORITY $706.08 10/6/2011 2990 PRIORITY $1,917.67 10/11/2011 2997 PRIORITY $695.76 $32.724,70 This is a violation of pharmacy law Unprofessional Conduct as it relates to Non?compliant Sales to wholesalers- Coast Compounding Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Profession Code section 4301 subdivision (0), which states violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter or of the applicable federal and state laws and regulations governing pharmacy, including regulations established by the Board or by any other state or federal regulatory agency as it relates to Business and Professions code 4126.5. Specifically, Coast Compounding Pharmacy located at 1838 8 Coast Hwy in Oceanside, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them multiple times on the same day from McKesson, a wholesaler, located at 9501 S. Non/valk Blvd. in Santa Fe Springs, CA circumventing the allocation system instituted by the drug manufacturer for drugs in short supply, thus increasing the shortage of the dangerous drugs and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Blvd. in San Diego, CA on the following dates and invoices: 1. Coast Compounding for invoice 2830, dated 6/7/11 purchased Epinephrine 1mg/ml 7 times from McKesson on the same date. 2. Coast Compounding for invoice 2832, dated 6/8/11 purchased Phenylephrine 10mg injection from McKesson f13 times on the same date. 3. Coast compounding for invoice 2906, dated 8/2/11 purchased Sodium Acetate injection from McKesson 4 times on the same date. 4. Coast Compounding for invoice #2924, dated 8/12/2011 purchased 10% 12 times from McKesson on the same date. 5. Coast Compounding for invoice 2936, dated 8/23/1011 purchased Aminocaproic 5gm.injection from McKesson 4 times on the same date. 6. Coast Compounding for invoice 2990, dated 10/6/2011 purchased Calcium Giuconate 10% injection from McKesson 4 times on the same date. 7. Coast Compounding for invoice 2997, dated 10/1/11 purchased Sodium acetate 40meq from McKesson 4 times on the same date. This is a violation of pharmacy law. CITATION ISSUED ON: Februaw 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF 332.275.00 PAYMENT OF FINES) DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Name, License No. Cl 2011 49883 CROCKER DRUG, PHY 20049 JURISDICTION: Bus. 8: Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE 'Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $5,100.00 subd. CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Crocker Drug was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. Which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sIIf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Crocker Drug located at 502 South Euclid No 100 in National City, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Crocker Drug did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Crocker Drugs gave their McKesson account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Crocker Drugs knowing what was being ordered. Crocker Drug depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/11/2011 1 PRIORITY $264.13 9/12/2011 2 PRIORITY $181.80 9/15/2011 3 PRIORITY $137.05 9/15/2011 4 PRIORITY $165.49 9/30/2011 5 PRIORITY $73.71 $822.18 This is a violation of pharmacy law. I mimic OPFINEISI availavz-Jma-sa?i?it 2:612:21.- BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 49884 Name, License No. FELICITA PHARMACY, PHY 50423 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $4,300.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage subd. CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- Felicita Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Felicita Pharmacy located at 625 Citracado Pkwy Ste 106 in Escondido, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from HD Smith, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Felicita Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Felicita Pharmacy gave their H.D. Smith account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Felicita Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Felicita Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 9/20/2011 1 PRIORITY $1,519.65 10/3/2011 2 PRIORITY $393.60 10/6/2011 3 PRIORITY $71.25 10/6/2011 4 PRIORITY $413.40 $2,397.90 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINEISI: $4300.00 PAYMENT OF FINEISI DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number CI 2011 49885 Name,lLicense No. JP PHARMACY INC, PHY 50373 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dahgerous Drugs by $3,100.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary. shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. JP Pharmacy Inc was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, JP Pharmacy Inc located at 9188 Mira Mesa in San Diego, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. JP Pharmacy Inc did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. JP Pharmacy Inc depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug, would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/1/2011 1 PRIORITY $375.10 6/1/2011 2 PRIORITY $90.30 6/8/2011 3 PRIORITY $229.00 8/8/2011 4 PRIORITY $87.80 $782.20 This is a violation of pharmacy law OF 3Y3: BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Name, License No. Cl 2011 49886 LA VITA COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, PHY 48731 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $18,800.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler; La Vita Compounding Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, La Vita Compounding Pharmacy located at 3978 Sorrento Valley #300 in San Diego, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from HD Smith, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd. Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. La Vita Compounding Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. La Vita Compounding Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate Specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 12/20/2010 10167 PRIORITY $429.00 1/24/2011 10170 PRIORITY $165.99 1/26/2011 10171 PRIORITY $64.35 2/18/2011 10175 PRIORITY $78.32 3/15/2011 10180 PRIORITY $538.01 3/17/2011 10181 PRIORITY $264.00 3/18/2011 10182 PRIORITY $389.77 3/28/2011 10183 PRIORITY $2,263.18 4/5/2011 10187 PRIORITY $251.10 4/7/2011 10189 PRIORITY $538.01 4/11/2011 10190 PRIORITY $140.58 4/12/2011 10191 PRIORITY $334.03 4/20/2011 10192 PRIORITY $88.16 4/26/2011 10193 PRIORITY $109.00 4/26/2011 10194 PRIORITY $208.48 4/26/2011 10195 PRIORITY $20.78 4/27/2011 10196 PRIORITY $572.75 4/29/2011 10197 PRIORITY $102.24 5/3/2011 10201 PRIORITY $14.06 5/10/2011 10202 PRIORITY $531.66 6/1 /2011 10204 PRIORITY $47.83 6/3/2011 10208 PRIORITY $149.44 6/20/2011 10206 PRIORITY $448.30 8/16/2011 10216 PRIORITY $120.52 $7,869.56 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ISSUED 0N: Februaw 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINEISI: 518.800.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Name, License No. Cl 2011 49887 MEDICAL ARTS PHARMACY, PHY 45941 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. ?Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $69,750.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Bus. Prof. Code 4059.5 A dangerous drug or dangerous device $2,500.00 subd. (e)lTitle 21, CFR shall not be transferred, sold, or 205.4 delivered to a person outside this stateNllholesale drug distributor licensing requirement Bus. 8. Prof. Code 4059.5 Dangerous drugs and devices may only $2,500.00 subd. be ordered and sahll be delivered to licensed premises and signed for and received by a CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Medical Arts Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4125.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Medical Arts Pharmacy located at 8851 Center Dr No 110 in La Mesa, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical, located at 4040 Sorrento Blvd., San Diego CA 92121; Dubin Medical located at 970 Turquoise St. San Diego, CA 92109; Gulf Coast Pharmaceuticals, located at 995 North Halstead Rd., Ocean Springs MS 39564 and Vital Health Care located at 11 East Lathrop Ave. Savannah, GA 31415. Medical Arts Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed these wholesalers to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for these wholesalers. Medical Arts Pharmacy depended on the wholesalers to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESLER AMOUNT 4/21/2011 421111 PRIORITY $268.03 1/20/2010 12010 PRIORITY $4,383.00 1/14/2010 11410 PRIORITY $5,389.20 1/11/2010 1112010 PRIORITY $6,033.89 1/5/2010 1510 PRIORITY $549.74 12/22/2010 122209 PRIORITY $6,119.50 12/21/2009 122109 PRIORITY $3,476.50 12/15/2009 121509 PRIORITY $2,123.22 12/8/2009 12809 PRIORITY $9,058.00 11/1/3009 113009 PRIORITY $5,014.32 11/23/2009 112309 PRIORITY $5,295.00 11/19/2009 111909 PRIORITY $2,415.00 11/18/2009 111809 PRIORITY $2,893.00 10/1/2709 28 PRIORITY $625.00 9/1/2009 9 PRIORITY $800.00 1/26/2009 7 PRIORITY $1,710.00 1/26/2009 6 PRIORITY $3,645.00 - 1/14/2009 5 PRIORITY $2,000.00 $61,798.40 6/14/2010 61410 DUBIN MED. $382.20 5/27/2010 52710 DUBIN MED. $41.07 5/24/2010 P075976 DUBIN MED. $120.00 5/21/2010 52110 DUBIN MED. $123.57 $666.84 10/4/2011 10411 GULF COAST $1,078.92 10/3/2011 10311 GULF COAST $1,078.92 9/13/2011 91311 GULF COAST $992.32 9/16/2011 91611 GULF COAST $1,029.42 9/7/2011 .833 GULF COAST $835.00 8/23/2011 82211 GULF COAST $707.96 6/6/2011 6611 GULF COAST $686.40 4/20/2011 41011 GULF COAST $338.04 4/8/2011 4811 GULF COAST $120.00 1/27/2011 12711 GULF COAST $605.64 1/17/2011 11711 GULF COAST $1,348.75 8/4/2010 8410 GULF COAST $478.50 5/6/2010 5610 GULF COAST $1,067.05 4/6/2010 4610 GULF COAST $34653.63 3/26/2010 32610 GULF COAST $598.98 3/22/2010 32210 GULF COAST $1,875.00 31010 GULF COAST $1,898.37 3/3/2010 3310 GULF COAST $3,773.37 2/25/2010 22510 GULF COAST $311.44 $22,477.71 VITAL 8/8/2011 8811 HEALTH $4,741.62 VITAL 7/11/2011 71111 HEALTH $2,665.14 VITAL 8/1/2311 832 HEALTH $1,050.00 VITAL 6/23/2011 62311 HEALTH $950.88 VITAL 6/27/2011 62711 HEALTH $5,968.83 . VITAL 6/28/2011 62811 HEALTH $541.92 6/15/2011 61511 $1,982.49 VITAL HEALTH VITAL 6/6/2011 6611 HEALTH $3,746.55 VITAL 6/15/2011 61511 HEALTH $2,957.50 VITAL 5/20/2011 52011 HEALTH $44.66 VITAL 5/12/2011 51211 HEALTH $660.59 VITAL 5/11/2011 51111 HEALTH $2,165.20 VITAL 4/20/2011 42011 HEALTH $541.92 VITAL 4/6/2011 4611 HEALTH $967.74 VITAL 3/29/2011 32911 HEALTH $542.62 VITAL 3/26/2011 32611 HEALTH $604.61 VITAL 3/23/2011 32311 HEALTH $492.42 VITAL 5/27/2010 52710 HEALTH $613.63 VITAL 1/17/2011 11711 HEALTH $1,234.65 VITAL 3/6/2011 3611 HEALTH $1,291.30 VITAL 3/14/2011 31411 HEALTH $194.27 VITAL 4/19/2010 41910 HEALTH $1,310.36 VITAL 4/6/2010 4610 HEALTH $5,955.99 VITAL 3/12/2010 31210 HEALTH $1,112.77 VITAL 2/16/2010 21610 HEALTH $4,500.00 VITAL 12/16/2009 121609 HEALTH $467.00 VITAL 6/14/2010 61410 HEALTH $135.59 VITAL 12/9/2009 12909 HEALTH $1,167.00 VITAL 11/25/2009 112509 HEALTH $1,575.00 VITAL 1.1/16/2009 111609 HEALTH $3,669.00 VITAL 11/11/2009 111109 HEALTH $7,613.63 VITAL 11/3/2009 11309 HEALTH $2,075.00 $64;360.15 $149,323.10 $149,323.10 This is a Violation of pharmacy law. De?nition of wholesale distributor as de?ned in 21 CFR 205.3 subd. (9) means any one engaged in wholesale distribution of prescription drugs, including, but not limited to, retail pharmacies that conduct wholesale distribution Unlicensed Activity. Medical Arts Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Profession Code section 4059.5 which prohibits sale of dangerous drugs outside of CA without complying with regulations in the receiving states, as it relates to 21 Code of Federal Regulations section 205.4 which states every wholesale distributor in a State who engages in wholesale distributions of prescription drugs in interstate commerce must be licensed by the State licensing authority. Speci?cally, Medical Arts Pharmacy located at 8851 Center Dr. #110 in La Mesa, CA 91942 purchased and sold dangerous drugs to Gulf Coast Pharmaceuticals, Inc. located at 995 N. Halstead Rd. in Ocean Spring, MS and to Vital Healthcare located at 11 E. Lathrop Ave. in Savannah, GA and in addition Medical Arts Pharmacy is in violation of the Of?cial Code of Georgia Annotated (OCGA) 26?4?115 subd which states all persons, firms, or corporation, whether located in this state or in any other state engaged in the business of selling or distributing drugs at wholesale in this state shall be registered as a drug wholesaler. Medical Arts Pharmacy made these sales on the following dates and purchase order numbers: 10/4/2011 10411 GULF COAST $1,078.92 10/3/2011 10311 GULF COAST $1,078.92 9/13/2011 91311 GULF COAST $992.32 9/16/2011 91611 GULF COAST $1,029.42 9/7/2011 833 GULF COAST $835.00 8/23/2011 82211 GULF COAST $707.96 6/6/2011 6611 GULF COAST $686.40 4/20/2011 41011 GULF COAST $338.04 4/8/2011 4811 GULF COAST $120.00 1/27/2011 12711 GULF COAST $605.64 1/17/2011 11711 GULF COAST $1,348.75 8/4/2010. 8410 GULF COAST $478.50 5/6/2010 5610 GULF COAST $1,067.05 4/6/2010 4610 GULF COAST 9 $3,653.63 3/26/2010 32610 GULF COAST $598.98 3/22/2010 32210 GULF COAST $1,875.00 3/10/2010 31010 GULF COAST $1,898.37 3/3/2010 3310 GULF COAST $3,773.37 2/25/2010 22510 GULF COAST $311.44 $22,477.71 VITAL 8/8/2011 8811 HEALTH $4,741.62 VITAL 7/11/2011 71111 HEALTH $2,665.14 VITAL 8/1/2311 832 HEALTH $1,050.00 VITAL 6/23/2011 62311 HEALTH $950.88 . VITAL 6/27/2011 62711 HEALTH $5,968.83 VITAL 6/28/2011 62811 HEALTH $541.92 VITAL 6/15/2011 61511 HEALTH $1,982.49 VITAL 6/6/2011 6611 HEALTH $3,746.55 VITAL 6/15/2011 61511 HEALTH $2,957.50 VITAL 5/20/2011 52011 HEALTH $44.68 VITAL 5/12/2011 51211 HEALTH $860.59 VITAL 5/11/2011 51111 HEALTH $2,185.20 VITAL 4/20/2011 42011 HEALTH $541.92 VITAL 4/6/2011 461 1 HEALTH $987.74 VITAL 3/29/2011 32911 HEALTH $542.82 VITAL 3/28/2011 32811 HEALTH $804.61 VITAL 13/23/2011 32311 HEALTH $492.42 VITAL 5/27/2010 52710 HEALTH $813.68 VITAL 1/17/2011 11711 HEALTH $1,234.65 VITAL 3/8/2011 3811 HEALTH $1,291.30 3/14/2011 31411 HEALTH $194.27 VITAL 4/19/2010 41910 HEALTH $1,310.36 VITAL 4/8/2010 4810 HEALTH $5,955.99 VITAL 3/12/2010 31210 HEALTH $1,112.77 VITAL 2/16/2010 21610 HEALTH $4,500.00 VITAL 12l18/2009 121809 HEALTH $467.00 VITAL 6/14/2010 61410 HEALTH $135.59 VITAL 12/9/2009 12909 HEALTH $1,167.00 VITAL 11/25/2009 112509 HEALTH $1 ,575.00 . VITAL 11/18/2009 111809 HEALTH $3,869.00 VITAL 11/1112009 111109 HEALTH $7,613.63 VITAL 11/3/2009 11309 HEALTH $2075.00 $64,380.15 This is a violation of pharmacy law. Non Compliant Delivery of Dangerous Drugs. Medical Arts Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4059.5 subd which states except as otherwise provided in this chapter, dangerous drugs or dangerous devices may only be ordered by an entity licensed by the board and shall be delivered to the licensed premises and signed for and received by a pharmacist. Where a licensee is permitted to operate through a designated representative, the designated representative shall sign for and receive the delivery. Speci?cally, Medical Arts Pharmacy located at 8851 Center Dr. #110 in La Mesa, CA 91942 purchased and sold dangerous drugs to Gulf Coast Pharmaceuticals, Inc. located at 995 N. Halstead Rd. in Ocean Spring, MS and to Vital Healthcare located at 11 E. Lathrop Ave. in Savannah, GA and allowed Mr. Charles Burruss and unlicensed employee of these wholesalers to pick up these sales at Medical Arts Pharmacy in Californian on the following dates and purchase order numbers: 10/4/2011 10411 GULF COAST $1,078.92 10/3/2011 10311 GULF COAST $1,078.92 9/13/2011 91311 GULF COAST $992.32 9/16/2011 91611 GULF COAST $1,029.42 9/7/2011 833 GULF COAST $835.00 8/23/201 1 8221 1 GULF COAST $707.96 6/6/2011 6611 GULF COAST $686.40 4/20/2011 41011 GULF COAST $338.04 4/8/2011 4811 GULF COAST $120.00 1/27/2011 12711 GULF COAST $605.64 1/17/2011 11711 GULF COAST $1,348.75 8/4/2010 8410 GULF COAST $478.50 . 5/6/2010 5610 GULF COAST $1,067.05 4/6/2010 4610 GULF COAST $3,653.63 3/26/2010 32610 GULF COAST $598.98 3/22/2010 32210 GULF COAST $1,875.00 3/10/2010 31010 GULF COAST $1,898.37 3/3/2010 3310 GULF COAST $3773.37 2/25/2010 22510 GULF COAST $311.44 $22,477.71 VITAL 8/8/2011 8811 HEALTH $4,741.62 VITAL 7/11/2011 71111 HEALTH $2,665.14 This a violation of pharmacy law. - 5v an Era? at. r'fasepw w? :3 a Na 1:339:55- -. in?! I: ms; 1l' l' r. craggy: r-u-v Citation Number Cl 2011 49888 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Name, License No. PHARMACY, PHY 39226 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $11,300.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage subd. CONDUCT: Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler- Murphy?s Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, Murphy's Pharmacy located at 172 San Jacinto in Hemet, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Murphy's Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Murphy?s Pharmacy gave their McKesson account number Priority and authorization to order drugs without Murphy?s Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Murphy's Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/1/2011 1 PRIORITY $44.00 6/7/2011 2 PRIORITY $184.24 6/10/2011 3 PRIORITY $47.03 8/2/2011 4 PRIORITY $763.69 8/5/2011 5 PRIORITY $49.45 8/15/2011 6 PRIORITY $295.63 8/17/2011 7 PRIORITY $70.24 8/24/2011 8 PRIORITY $84.28 9/12/2011 9 PRIORITY $443.79 9/15/2011 10 PRIORITY $248.40 9/30/2011 11 PRIORITY $79.95 $2,310.70 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $11.300.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Name, License No. Cl 2011 49889 QUALITY-CARE PHARMACY, PHY 39483 JURISDICTION: Bus. 8: Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $3,075.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler. Quality-Care Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Quality-Care Pharmacy located at 727 San Marcos #113 in San Marcos, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal Health, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Quality-Care Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Quality?Care Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or iflack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 5/18/2011 1 PRIORITY $25.80 6/14/2011 2 PRIORITY $161.56 6/22/2011 3 PRIORITY $343.73 $531.09 This is a violation of pharmacy law.? 606317.:- -i BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Name, License No. RANCHO PARK PHARMACY, PHY 47058 Citation Number Cl 2011 49890 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $17,300.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Bus. Prof. Code 4059.5 subd. Dangerous drugs and devices may only Citation without a be ordered and shall be delivered fine to licensed premises and signed for and received by a CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? Rancho Park Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, Rancho Park Pharmacy located at 1331 Encinitas in Encinitas, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Rancho Park Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Rancho Park Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 4/20/2011 1 PRIORITY $530.16 4/22/2011 2 PRIORITY $2,114.95 5/4/2011 3 PRIORITY $1,346.90 5/4/2011 4 PRIORITY $538.80 5/4/2011 5 PRIORITY $116.20 5/11/2011 6 PRIORITY $387.30 5/26/2011 7 PRIORITY $36.30 5/26/2011 8 PRIORITY $376.10 6/1/2011 9 PRIORITY $27.80 6/9/2011 10 PRIORITY $374.00 6/30/2011 11 PRIORITY $248.35 7/11/2011 12 PRIORITY $193.89 7/11/2011 13 PRIORITY $157.25 7/14/2011 14 PRIORITY $1,166.55 7/19/2011 15 PRIORITY $617.78 7/21/2011 16 PRIORITY $269.10 7/25/2011 17 PRIORITY $429.46 7/25/2011 18 PRIORITY $206.79 8/4/2011 19 PRIORITY $819.62 8/24/2011 20 PRIORITY $94.32 9/20/2011 21 PRIORITY $225.35 $10,276.97 This is a violation of pharmacy law Non?Compliant Delivery of Dangerous Drugs- Ranch Park Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4059.5 subdivision which states except as othen/vise provided in this chapter, dangerous drugs or dangerous devices may only be ordered by an entity licensed by the board and shall be delivered to the licensed premises and signed for and received by a pharmacist. Where a licensee is permitted to operate through a designated representative, the designated representative shall sign for and receive the delivery. Specifically, Rancho Park Pharmacy located at 1331 Encinitas in Encinitas, CA ordered dangerous drugs and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Rancho Park did not deliver the drugs to the licensed premises of Priority Pharmaceutical and have the orders signed for and received by a designated representative on the following invoices and dates: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 4/20/2011 1 PRIORITY $530.16 4/22/2011 2 PRIORITY $2,114.95 5/4/2011 3 PRIORITY $1,346.90 5/4/2011 4 PRIORITY $538.80 5/4/2011 5 PRIORITY $116.20 5/11/2011 6 PRIORITY $387.30 5/26/2011 7 PRIORITY $36.30 5/26/2011 8 PRIORITY $376.10 6/1/2011 9 PRIORITY $27.80 6/9/2011 10 PRIORITY $374.00 6/30/2011 11 PRIORITY $248.35 7/11/2011 12 PRIORITY $193.89 7/11/2011 13 PRIORITY $157.25 7/14/2011 14 PRIORITY $1,166.55 7/19/2011 15 PRIORITY $617.78 7/21/2011 16 PRIORITY $269.10 7/25/2011 17 PRIORITY $429.46 7/25/2011 18 PRIORITY $206.79 8/4/2011 19 PRIORITY $819.62 8/24/2011 20 PRIORITY $94.32 9/20/2011 21 PRIORITY $225.35 $10,276.97 This is a violation of pharmacy law. CITATION ISSUED ON: March 13. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINEISI: $17,300.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: April 12. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Cl 2011 51344 Name, License No. MARJAN AMINI, RPH 47356 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. 8: Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy 'or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Marjan Amini while she was Pharmacist?in? Charge at Tormed Pharmacy Inc was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in?quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Marjan Amini while she was Pharmacist-Charge of Tormed Pharmacy Inc located at 3440 West Lomlta in Torrance, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal, Mckesson and/or HD Smith, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste San Diego, CA 92121. Tormed Pharmacy Inc did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority PharmaceutiCals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Tormed Pharmacy gave their account numbers for Cardinal, Mckesson and HD Smith to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Tormed Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Tormed Pharmacy Inc depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a ?temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice number: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/25/2011 1 PRIORITY $350.66 8/1/2011 2 PRIORITY $374.42 8/5/2011 3 PRIORITY $51.55 8/16/2011 4 PRIORITY $907.43 8/24/2011 5 PRIORITY $177.64 8/26/2011 6 PRIORITY $2,195.89 9/7/2011 7 PRIORITY $99.36 9l19/2011 8 PRIORITY $205.57 9/20/2011 9 PRIORITY $1,024.65 9/27/2011 10 PRIORITY $504.46 9/30/2011 11 PRIORITY $56.52 . $5,948.15 This is a violation of pharmacy law. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: 0 Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its I designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Marjan Amini shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months ?of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Marjan Amini timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Marjan Amini timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. lf RPH Marjan Amini fails to timely seek pre?approva?l, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Marjan Amini within thirty (30) days of any such failure,?BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number CI 2011 51345 Name, License No. ANDREW LAI, RPH 50333 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $1,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Andrew Lai while he/she was Pharmacist? in-Charge at Apothecary Pharmacy Inc was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Andrew Lai while he/she was Pharmacist-Charge of Apothecary Pharmacy Inc located at 1500 Southgate Ave Ste 109 in Daly City, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Apothecary Pharmacy Inc did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Apothecary Pharmacy gave their McKesson account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Apothecary Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Apothecary Pharmacy Inc depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 8/25/2011 1 PRIORITY $298.25 7/29/2011 2 PRIORITY $51.03 8/30/2011 3 PRIORITY $252.79 9/13/2011 4 PRIORITY $466.82 9/19/2011 5 PRIORITY $512.06 9/27/2011 6 PRIORITY $544.47 9/30/2011 7 PRIORITY $68.17 10/3/2011 8 PRIORITY $203.37 10/10/2011 9 PRIORITY $183.06 $2,580.02 This is a violation of pharmacy law. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: 0 Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Andrew Lai shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Andrew Lai timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Andrew Lai timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citatiOn. lf RPH Andrew Lai fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the fine(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Andrew Lai within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $1000.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 51346 Name, License No. RAFAEL JUAREZ, RPH 39936 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage subd. CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- RPH Rafael Juarez while he was Pharmacist-in- Charge at Murphy's Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Rafael Juarez while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Murphy's Pharmacy located at 172 San Jacinto in Hemet, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Murphy's Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Murphy?s Pharmacy gave their McKesson account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Murphy?s Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Murphy's Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/1/2011 1 PRIORITY $44.00 6/7/2011 2 PRIORITY $184.24 6/10/2011 3 PRIORITY $47.03 8/2/2011 4 PRIORITY $763.69 8/5/2011 5 PRIORITY $49.45 8/15/2011 6 PRIORITY $295.63 8/17/2011 7 PRIORITY $70.24 8/24/2011 8 PRIORITY $84.28 9/12/2011 9 PRIORITY $443.79 9/15/2011 10 PRIORITY $248.40 9/30/2011 11 PRIORITY $79.95 $2,310.70 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: 0 Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Rafael Juarez shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow?up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Rafael Juarez timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Rafael Juarez timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Rafael Juarez fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the fine(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Rafael Juarez within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $5000.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 51347 Name, License No. LISA MARIE FAAST, RPH 52905 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. (6) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- RPH Lisa Faast while she was Pharmacist-in- Charge at Faast Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Lisa Faast while she was Pharmacist-Charge of Faast Pharmacy located at 3400 Calloway Dr #701 in Bakers?eld, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal Health, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Faast Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Faast Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/8/2011 1 PRIORITY $652.70 6/14/2011 2 PRIORITY $264.00 6/15/2011 3 PRIORITY $93.50 6/23/2011 4 PRIORITY $130.79 6/23/2011 5 PRIORITY $343.73 7/6/2011 6 PRIORITY $130.68 7/18/2011 7 PRIORITY $243.43 8/1/2011 8 PRIORITY $275.69 $2,134.52 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Lisa Faast shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Lisa Faast timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Lisa Faast timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Lisa Faast fails to timely seek pre?approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the fine(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Lisa Faast within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF 35.000130 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24.2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Cl 2011 51348 Name, License No. AYK DZHRAGATSPANYAN, RPH 54710 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? RPH Ayk Dzhragatspanyan while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge at Studio City Drugs was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporaiy shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Ayk Dzhragatspanyan while. he was Pharmacist-Charge of Studio City Drugs located at 11709 Ventura in Studio City, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Studio City Drugs did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Studio City Drugs gave their Amerisource Bergen account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs on the pharmacy?s behalf. Studio City Drugs depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack Of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/27/2011 1 PRIORITY $73.39 6/27/2011 2 PRIORITY $113.41 6/30/2011 3 PRIORITY $152.23 7/7/2011 4 PRIORITY $493.90 7/8/2011 5 PRIORITY $57.24 7/11/2011 6 PRIORITY $855.47 7/14/2011 7 PRIORITY $433.84 7/15/2011 8 PRIORITY $117.15 7/18/2011 9 PRIORITY $959.53 7/26/2011 10 PRIORITY $39.28 7/29/2011 11 PRIORITY $109.08 8/1/2011 12 PRIORITY $1,440.12 8/1/2011 13 PRIORITY $2,533.63 8/2/2011 14 PRIORITY $764.48 8/4/2011 15 PRIORITY $4,863.01 8/10/2011 16 PRIORITY $2,077.87 8/12/2011 17 PRIORITY $22.94 8/15/2011 18 PRIORITY $115.64 8/23/2011 19 PRIORITY $767.16 8/25/2011 20 PRIORITY $272.70 9/7/2011 21 PRIORITY $92.23 $16,354.30 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Ayk Dzhragatspanyan shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Ayk Dzhragatspanyan timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Ayk Dzhragatspanyan timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Ayk Dzhragatspanyan fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Ayk Dzhragatspanyan within thirty (30) days of any such failure. ?irt/:3. W: $31411: rm .1111, gain-W1 53-41181 My 1347,- fail-1533171 it ?ve 531431 Hearst?is??y? swirl;in '28: 1.18;: 715 rat-31 bi Em BOARD OF PHARMACY I DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number CI 2011 51349 Name, License No. WAI YAN RPH 48033 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. 8. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler?RPH Wai Yan while he was Pharmacist-in?Charge at Plaza Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Wai Yan while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Plaza Pharmacy located at 2220 Plaza in National City, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal Health, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd, Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Plaza Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Plaza Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 5/31/2011 1 PRIORITY $324.20 6/2/2011 2 PRIORITY $83.20 6/6/2011 3 PRIORITY $98.30 6/8/2011 4 PRIORITY $638.40 6/22/2011 5 PRIORITY $357.15 7/1/2011 6 PRIORITY $15.76 7/6/2011 7 PRIORITY $205.17 7/7/2011 8 PRIORITY $58.62 7/13/2011 9 PRIORITY $188.56 7/18/2011 10 PRIORITY $24.90 7/21/2011 11 PRIORITY $2,743.29 7/28/2011 12 PRIORITY $801.99 8/16/2011 13 PRIORITY $290.25 8/31/2011 14 PRIORITY $94.57 9/15/2011 15 PRIORITY $67.10 9/21/2011 16 PRIORITY $283.50 $6,274.96 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: 0 Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Wai Yan shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Wai Yan timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the apprOved ethics course. If RPH Wai Yan timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. lf RPH Wai Yan falls to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Wai Yan within thirty (30) days of any such failure. asElihu: a- I . BOARD OF DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Name, License No. Cl 2011 51350 KAMBIZ GHOJEHVAND RPH 55614 JURISDICTION: Bus. 8: Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Kambiz Ghojehvand while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge at Felicita Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs oniy to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Kambiz Ghojehyand while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Felicita Pharmacy located at 625 Citracado Pkwy Ste 106 in Escondido, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from HD Smith, a wholesaler. and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Felicita Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify?the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Felicita Pharmacy gave their H.D. Smith account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Felicita Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Feticita Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 9/20/2011 1 PRIORITY $1,519.65 10/3/2011 2 PRIORITY $393.60 10/6/2011 3 PRIORITY $71.25 I - 10/6/2011 4 PRIORITY $413.40 $2,397.90 This is a violation of pharmacy law I ORDER OF the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board Or it's designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Kambiz Ghojehvand shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course. including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Kambiz Ghojehvand timely seeks pre~approvai of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending compietion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Kambiz Ghojehvand timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully compietes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Kambiz Ghojehvand fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the fine(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Kambiz Ghojehvand within thirty (30) days of any such failure. are lease: at? i was)?" .- Jae: . Jknw: I-rf ninja-J gin?re: and Ila?ht?c?ihv.? BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number CI 2011 51351 Name, License No. ABDUL KAREEM JAWAD, RPH 45101 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. (6) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $1,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? RPH Abdul Jawad while he was Pharmacist-in- Charge at Bristol Family Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Abdul Jawad while he was Pharmacist?Charge of Bristol Family Pharmacy located at 1126 8 Bristol Street in Santa Ana, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd. Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Bristol Family Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Bristol Family Pharmacy gave their AmerisourceBergen account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Bristol Family Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Bristol Family Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 8/4/2011 1 PRIORITY $274.97 8/9/2011 2 PRIORITY $210.30 8/11/2011 3 PRIORITY $96.17 8/25/2011 4 PRIORITY $270.17 9/6/2011 5 PRIORITY $282.86 $1,134.47 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Abdul Jawad shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Abdul Jawad timely seeks pre?approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Abdul Jawad timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. lf RPH Abdul Jawad fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Abdul Jawad within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION 0N: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF 51.000.00 PAYMENT OF FINEIS) DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Cl 2011 51352 Name, License No. PAYAM TIZABGAR, RPH 58101 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 subd. Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $2,000.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Payam Tizabgar while he was Pharmacist- in-Charge at SMC Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Payam Tizabgar while he was Pharmacist-Charge of SMC Pharmacy located at 1908 Santa Monica Ste 4 in Santa Monica, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from HD Smith, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd. in San Diego, CA 92121. SMC Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition SMC Pharmacy gave their HD Smith account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without SMC Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. SC Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE 5/23/2011 6/14/2011 6/15/2011 6/17/2011 6/20/2011 6/22/2011 6/24/2011 7/12/2011 INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT COMMENTS GAVE ACCESS TO PRIORITY TO 1 PRIORITY $350.60 ORDER 2 PRIORITY $421.58 3 PRIORITY $427.90 4 PRIORITY $179.32 5 PRIORITY $82.20 6 PRIORITY $74.97 7 PRIORITY $207.77 8 PRIORITY $84.87 8/15/2011 9 PRIORITY $269.33 8/24/2011 10 PRIORITY $222.20 8/31/2011 11 PRIORITY $558.90 8/31/2011 12 PRIORITY $558.90 9/14/2011 13 PRIORITY $184.28 19/15/2011 14 PRIORITY $683.10 9/20/2011 15 PRIORITY $1,024.65 9/21/2011 16 PRIORITY $652.05 9/29/2011 17 PRIORITY $621.79 9/30/2011 18 PRIORITY $393.60 10/5/2011 19 PRIORITY $47.50 $7,045.51 This is a violation of pharmacy law. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: 0 Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Payam Tizabgar shall thereafter initiate and suCcessfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Payam Tizabgar timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Payam Tizabgar timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Payam Tizabgar fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Payam Tizabgar within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $2300.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Name, License No. Cl 2011 51356 ALINE BOGNACKI, RPH 54288 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $1,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Aline Avakian while he/she was Pharmacist-in- Charge Universal Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Aline Avakian while she was Pharmacist-Charge of Universal Pharmacy located at 866 Vermont Ave 202 in Los Angeles, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from HD Smith, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento in San Diego, CA. Universal Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Universal Pharmacy gave their account number for HD Smith to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Universal Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Universal Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/7/2011 1 PRIORITY $1,165.30 6/9/201 1 2 PRIORITY $496.60 7/14/2011 3 PRIORITY $26.16 $1,688.06 This is a violation of pharmacy law. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Aline Avakian shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Aline Avakian timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Aline Avakian timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Aline Avakian fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Aline Avakian within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED ON: Februaryr 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $1 300.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number CI 2011 51361 Name, License No. STEPHANIE MASTORAKOS, RPH 50779 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. (6) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $1,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Stephanie Mastorakos while she was Pharmacist-in?Charge at Crocker Drug was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. Which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Stephanie Mastorakos while she was Pharmacist- Charge of Crocker Drug located at 502 South Euclid No 100 in National City, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Crocker Drug did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Crocker Drugs gave their McKesson account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Crocker Drugs knowing what was being ordered. Crocker Drug depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/11/2011 1 PRIORITY $264.13 9/12/2011 2 PRIORITY $181.80 9/15/2011 3 PRIORITY $137.05 9/15/2011 4 PRIORITY $165.49 9/30/2011 5 PRIORITY $73.71 $822.18 This is a violation of pharmacy law. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Stephanie Mastorakos shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Stephanie Mastorakos timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Stephanie Mastorakos timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to' zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. lf RPH Stephanie Mastorakos fails to timely seek pro-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Stephanie Mastorakos within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED 0N: Februarv 23.2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINEISI: 51.000.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Cl 2011 51362 Name, License No. KEVIN DANG, RPH 48802 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $1,000.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage subd. CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Kevin Dang while he was Pharmacist-in- Charge at Evergreen Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Kevin Dang while he was Pharmacist?Charge of Evergreen Pharmacy located at 2690 White Rd Ste 200A in San Jose, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Evergreen Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Evergreen Pharmacy gave their McKesson account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Evergreen Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Evergreen Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 8/25/2011 1 PRIORITY $198.59 8/29/2011 2 PRIORITY $644.76 9/13/2011 3 PRIORITY $426.09 9/19/2011 4 PRIORITY $390.56 9/22/201 1 5 PRIORITY $244.40 $1,904.40 This is a violation of pharmacy law. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Kevin Dang shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow?up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. lf RPH Kevin Dang timely seeks pre?approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Kevin Dang timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Kevin Dang fails to timely seek pre?approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Kevin Dang within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Name, License No. WILLIAM THOMAS ALTMILLER RPH 58094 Citation Number Cl 2011 51363 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- RPH William Altmiller while he was Pharmacist- in-Charge at Your Drug Store was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH William Altmiller while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Your Drug Store located at 2303 Niles Point in Bakersfield, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Your Drug Store did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Your Drug Store depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of. health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 5/31/2011 1 PRIORITY $168.00 6/3/2011 2 PRIORITY $111.10 6/9/2011 3 PRIORITY $76.96 6/14/2011 4 PRIORITY $47.03 6/27/2011 5 PRIORITY $227.26 6/30/2011 6 PRIORITY $1,326.82 7/15/2011 7 PRIORITY $759.00 7/19/2011 8 PRIORITY $1,429.89 7/29/201 1 9 PRIORITY $663.41 8/4/2011 10 PRIORITY $1,285.35 8/5/2011 11 PRIORITY $464.75 8/9/2011 12 PRIORITY $946.00 8/17/2011 13 PRIORITY $505.69 8/18/2011 14 PRIORITY $1,806.97 8/25/2011 15 PRIORITY $3,390.75 8/26/2011 16 PRIORITY $112.38 9/1/2011 17 PRIORITY $172.48 9/30/2011 18 PRIORITY $591.25 9/30/2011 19 PRIORITY $81.58 $14,166.67 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH William Altmiller shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH William Altmiller timely seeks pre?approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH William Altmiller timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH William Altmiller fails to timely seek pre?approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the fine(s) shall be due and owing from RPH William Altmiller within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED 0N: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $5000.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number CI 2011 51364 Name, License No. LIONEL FRANCIS JARA, RPH 21273 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 - Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage subd. CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Lionel Jara while he was Pharmacist-in- Charge at Santa Clara Drug'The Compounding Shop' was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Lionel Jara while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Santa Clara Drug'The Compounding Shop' located at 2453 Forest Avenue in San Jose, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen and Cardinal Health, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Santa Clara Drug'The Compounding Shop' did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Santa Clara Drugs gave their AmeriSource Bergen account number and Cardinal Health account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Santa Clara Drugs knowing what was being ordered. Santa Clara Drug'The Compounding Shop' depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/18/2011 1 PRIORITY $130.63 7/25/2011 2 PRIORITY $1,375.03 8/2/2011 3 PRIORITY $499.47 8/4/2011 4 PRIORITY $1,213.31 8/8/2011 5 PRIORITY $1,144.89 8/10/2011 6 PRIORITY $787.41 8/31/2011 7 PRIORITY $221.19 9/1/2011 8 PRIORITY $272.70 9/22/2011 9 PRIORITY $635.40 9/22/2011 10 PRIORITY $230.00 9/26/2011 11 PRIORITY $783.00 $7,293.03 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Lionel Jara shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. lf RPH Lionel Jara timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Lionel Jara timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Lionel Jara fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the fine(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Lionel Jara within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED ON: Februaw 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $5300.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Name, License No. Cl 2011 51366 CHRISTINE ANN GIVANT RPH 41076 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? RPH Christine Givant while she was Pharmacist- in-Charge at La Vita Compounding Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Christine Givant while she was Pharmacist-Charge of La Vita Compounding Pharmacy located at 3978 Sorrento Valley #300 in San Diego, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from HD Smith, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. La Vita Compounding Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. La Vita Compounding Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 12/20/2010 10167 PRIORITY $429.00 1/24/2011 10170 PRIORITY $165.99 1/26/2011 10171 PRIORITY $64.35 2/18/2011 10175 PRIORITY $78.32 3/15/2011 10180 PRIORITY $538.01 3/17/2011 10181 PRIORITY $264.00 3/18/2011 10182 PRIORITY $389.77 3/28/2011 10183 PRIORITY $2,263.18 4/5/2011 10187 PRIORITY $251.10 4/7/2011 10189 PRIORITY $538.01 4/11/2011 10190 PRIORITY $140.58 4/12/2011 10191 PRIORITY $334.03 4/20/2011 10192 PRIORITY $88.16 4/26/2011 10193 PRIORITY $109.00 4/26/2011 10194 PRIORITY $208.48 4/26/2011 10195 PRIORITY $20.78 4/27/2011 10196 PRIORITY $572.75 4/29/2011 10197 PRIORITY $102.24 5/3/2011 10201 PRIORITY $14.06 5/10/2011 10202 PRIORITY $531.66 6/1/2011 10204 PRIORITY $47.83 6/3/2011 10208 PRIORITY $149.44 6/20/2011 10206 PRIORITY $448.30 8/16/2011 10216 PRIORITY $120.52 $7,869.56 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Christine Gavant shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Christine Gavant timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Christine Gavant timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Christine Gavant fails to timely seek pre?approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Christine Gavant within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $5.000.00 PAYMENT OF FINEISI DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Cl 2011 51370 Name, License No. AARON DRAPER, RPH 50757 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage subd. CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? RPH Aaron Draper while he was Pharmacist-in? Charge at Manor Drugs was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Aaron Draper while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Manor Drugs located at 5795 First St in Fresno, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Manor Drugs did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Manor Drugs depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/12/2011 1 PRIORITY $276.49 7/12/2011 2 PRIORITY $220.87 7/12/2011 3 PRIORITY $73.59 8/5/2011 4 PRIORITY $691.41 8/5/2011 5 PRIORITY $25.23 8/9/2011 6 PRIORITY $69.22 8/15/2011 7 PRIORITY $215.39 8/18/2011 8 PRIORITY $122.62 8/26/2011 9 PRIORITY $1,076.74 $2,771.56 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Aaron Draper shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Aaron Draper timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Aaron Draper timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. lf RPH Aaron Draper fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the fine(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Aaron Draper within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED 0N: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $5.000.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Cl 2011 51371 Name, License No. AHMED SADEK ATALLAH RPH 37668 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesalern RPH Ahmed Atallah while he was Pharmacist-in- Charge at Fox Drugs was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Ahmed Atallah while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Fox Drugs located at 1327 El Prado in Torrance, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Fox Drugs did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Fox Drugs gave their Amerisource Bergen account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Fox Drugs knowing what was being ordered. Fox Drugs depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/14/2011 1 PRIORITY $73.59 6/16/2011 2 PRIORITY $183.39 6/22/2011 3 PRIORITY $40.40 6/30/2011 4 PRIORITY $73.59 7/8/2011 5 PRIORITY $259.84 7/13/2011 6 PRIORITY $123.41 7/25/2011 7 PRIORITY $410.78 7/29/2011 8 PRIORITY $121.51 8/16/2011 9 PRIORITY $70.85 9/6/2011 10 PRIORITY $279.72 $1,637.08 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: a Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Ahmed Atallah shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Ahmed Atallah timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Ahmed Atallah timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Ahmed Atallah fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Ahmed Atallah within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF 355.0003!) PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Name, License No. Citation Number CI 2011 51372 FARID SAGHIZADEH RPH 49999 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non?com pliant Sales to a wholesaler? RPH Farid Saghizadeh while he was Pharmacist-in- Charge of Bixby Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Farid Saghizadeh while he was Pharmacist?in-charge of Bixby Pharmacy located at 3816 Woodruff Ave #108 in Long Beach, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from AmerisourceBergen a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd. in San Diego, CA 92121 and Optimal Pharmaceuticals located at 8406 Magnolia Ave. in Santee, CA 92071. Bixby Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority and Optimal Pharmaceuticals. Bixby Pharmacy depended on Priority and Optimal to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT COMMENTS SOLD TO 2 DIFFERENT 6/28/2011 1 PRIORITY $197.74 WLS 6/28/2011 2 PRIORITY $163.48 7/7/2011 3 PRIORITY $73.59 7/18/2011 4 PRIORITY $134.73 7/27/2011 5 PRIORITY $123.88 9/28/2011 103 OPTIMAL $520.40 10/5/2011 104 OPTIMAL $358.13 $1,571.95 This is a violation of pharmacy law CITATION ISSUED ON: February 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINEISI: $5.000.00 PAYMENT OF FINEISI DUE BY: March 24. 2012 STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR. California State Board of Pharmacy 1625 North Market Boulevard. Suite N219, Sacramento, CA 95834 Phone (916) 574-7900 Fax (915) 574-8618 February 23, 2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL OF ADMONISHMENT NEGDA IVONNE DELA ROSA 2220 CALLE LISETA SAN DIMAS, CA 91773 RE: CI 2011 51373 NEGDA IVONNE DELA ROSA RPH 42338 This LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT is being issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 4005 and section 4315 et seq. for failure to comply with the laws and regulations that govern the practice of pharmacy in California. (For exact language refer to the California Pharmacy Law and Index, |oCated on the board?s website at under Forms and Publications.) The Board of Pharmacy has completed its investigation in the above referenced matter. All documentation and/or statements relating to the investigation have been accepted and included in an Investigation Report on file in this office. Facts contained in this report lead to the conclusion that the following violations of pharmacy laws or regulations have occurred: JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005, 4315; - Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler? RPH Negda DeLaRosa while she was Pharmacist-in-Charge at Super Market Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a' temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Negda DeLaRosa while she was Pharmacist-Charge of Super Market Pharmacy located at 6039 Florence in Bell Gardens, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal Health, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical. Super Market Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Super Market Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in i 'l a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice unumbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 8/21/2011 1874 PRIORITY $312.48 7/8/2011 1914 PRIORITY $82.28 7/11/2011 1918 PRIORITY $243.16 8/31/2011 1974 PRIORITY $28.02 $885.94 This is a violation of pharmacy law If you wish to contest this Letter of Admonishment, you may do so by submitting, within 30 days of the date of service of this Letter of Admonishment, namely March 24, 2012, the attached ?Request for an Office Conference" form. If an Office conference is not requested, compliance with the Letter of Ad monishment shall not constitute an admission of the violations described in the Letter of Admonishment. Unless it is dismissed following an office conference or you receive other instructions from the Board in writing, Pharmacy Law requires that you maintain and have readily 1 available for inspection a copy of this Letter of Admonishment and any written corrective action plan, if any, for at least three years from the date of issuance at the top of this letter. The Letter of Admonishment will be considered a public record for purposes of disclosure for three years from issuance. The issuance of this Letter of Admonishment does not limit the board?s ability to pursue other disciplinary or administrative action under Business and Professions Code section 4315, subdivision If you have any questions regarding this Letter of Admonishment, please contact Jennifer Sevilla, Associate Enforcement Analyst at (916) 5?4-7925. Sincerely Virginia Herold Executive Officer Board of Pharmacy STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR. California State Board of Pharmacy 1625 North Market Boulevard. Suite N219. Sacramento. CA 95834 Phone (916) 574-7900 Fax (916) 574-8618 February 23, 2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT SHERY EGHTESADI 9711 CASHIO ST LOS ANGELES, CA 90035 RE: CI 2011 51375 SHERY EGHTESADI RPH 59252 This LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT is being issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 4005 and section 4315 et seq. for failure to comply with the laws and regulations that govern the practice of pharmacy in California. (For exact language refer to the California Pharmacy Law and Index, located on the board?s website at under Forms and Publications.) The Board of Pharmacy has completed its investigation in the above referenced matter. All documentation and/or statements relating to the investigation have been accepted and included in an Investigation Report on ?le in this office. Facts contained in this report lead to the conclusion that the following violations of pharmacy laws or regulations have occurred: JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005,4315; - Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? RPH Shery Eghtesadi while she was Pharmacist-in-Charge at Rancho Park Pharmacy was not in Compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Shery Eghtesadi while she was Pharmacist-Charge of Rancho Park Pharmacy located at 10569 Pico in Los Angeles, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal Health, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd,Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Rancho Park Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Rancho Park Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific ,3 shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack'lof the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 715/201 1 1 $66.87 7/3/201 1 2 PRIORITY $66.87 $133.74 This is a violation of pharmacy law If you wish to contest this Letter of Admonishment, you may do so by submitting, within 30 days of the date of service of this Letter of Admonishment, namely March 24, 2012, the attached ?Request for an Office Conference? form. If an office conference is not requested, compliance with the Letter of Admonishment shall not constitute an admission of the violations described in the Letter of Admonishment. Unless it is dismissed following an Office conference or you receive other instructions from the Board in writing, Pharmacy Law requires that you maintain and have readily available for inspection a copy of this Letter of Admonishment and any written corrective action plan, if any, for at least three years from the date of issuance at the top of this letter. The Letter of Admonishment will be considered a public record for purposes of disclosure for three years from issuance. The issuance of this Letter of Admonishment does not limit the board?s ability to pursue other disciplinary or administrative action under Business and Professions Code section 4315, subdivision If you have any questions regarding this Letter of Admonishment, please centact Jennifer Sevilla, Associate Enforcement Analyst at (916) 574-7925. Sincerely U. EM Virginia Herold Executive Officer Board of Pharmacy . . . ERS VICES AGENCY California State Board of Pharmacy OOEZUMER AFFAIRS 1625 North Market Boulevard. Suite N219. Sacramento. CA 95834 GOVERNOR EDMUND 5 BROWN JR. Phone (916) 574-7900 Fax {916) 574-8618 February 23, 2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT PHIL LOWELL MILLMAN PO BOX 4369 CA 90602 RE: CI 2011 51377 PHIL LOWELL MILLMAN . RPH 38013 This LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT is being issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 4005 and section 4315 et seq. for failure to comply with the laws and regulations that govern the practice of pharmacy in California. (For exact language refer to the California Pharmacy Law and Index, located on the board?s website at under Forms and Publications.) The Board of Pharmacy has completed its investigation in the above referenced matter. All documentation and/or statements relating to the investigation have been accepted and included in an Investigation Report on file in this office. Facts contained in this report lead to the conclusion that the following violations of pharmacy laws or regulations have occurred: JURISDICTICN: Bus. Prof. Code 4005, 4315; - Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Non-Compliant Sales to a wholesaler? RPH Phil Millman while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge at Chemique Pharmaceutical Services was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Phil Millman while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Chemique Pharmaceutical Services located at 13306 Whittier in Whittier, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical. Chemique Pharmaceutical Services did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Chemique Pharmaceutical Services depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug Would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS 6/7/2011 1 $110.50 This is a violation of pharmacy law If you wish to contest this Letter of Admonishment, you may do so by submitting, within 30 days of the date of service of this Letter of Admonishment, namely March 24, 2012, the attached "Request for an Office Conference" form. If an office conference is not requested, compliance with the Letter of Admonishment shall not constitute an admission of the violations described in the Letter of Admonishment. Unless-it is dismissed following an office conference or you receive other instructions from the Board in writing, Pharmacy Law requires that you maintain and have readily available for inspection a copy of this Letter of Admonishment and any written corrective action plan, if any, for at least three years from the date of issuance at the top of this letter. The Letter of Admonishment will be considered a public record for purposes of disclosure . for three years from issuance. The issuance of this Letter of Admonishment does not limit the board?s ability to pursue other disciplinary or administrative action under Business and Professions Code section 4315, subdivision If you have any questions regarding this Letter of Admonishment, please contact Jennifer Sevilla, Associate Enforcement Analyst at (916) 574-7925. Sincerely . aw Virginia Herold Executive Of?cer Board of Pharmacy California State Board of Pharmacy 235:2: Suite N219. Sacramento, CA 95834 GOVERNOR EDMUND BROWN JR Fax (916) 574-8618 February 28, 2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT LISA CAROL HOLLOMAN 9009 LLOYD PL HOLLYWOOD, CA 90069 RE: Cl 2011 51380 LISA CAROL HOLLOMAN RPH 47958 This LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT is being issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 4005 and section 4315 et seq. for failure to comply with the laws and regulations that govern the practice of pharmacy in California. (For exact language refer to the California Pharmacy Law and Index, located on the board?s website at under Forms and Publications.) The Board of Pharmacy has completed its investigation in the above referenced matter. All documentation and/or statements relating to the investigation have been accepted and included in an Investigation Report on file in this office. Facts contained in this report lead to the conclusion that the following violations of pharmacy laws or regulations have occurred: JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005, 4315; - Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or wholesale.'.. alleviate temporary shortage Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- RPH Lisa Holloman while he/she was Pharmacist-in-Charge at University Care Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivsion which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Lisa Holloman while he/she was Pharmacist-Charge of University Care Pharmacy located at 5848 Santa Monica in Los Angeles, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical. University Care Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary. shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. University Care Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or . ll I if lack of the drug wot/Id result in a denial of health care, thus'lincreasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/27/201 1 1 PRIORITY $528.88 7/6/2011 2 PRIORITY $1,823.05 8/5/2011 3 PRIORITY $48.38 8/24/2011 4 PRIORITY $42.14 9/13/2011 5 PRIORITY $121.44 $2,563.87 This is a violation of pharmacy law If you wish to contest this Letter of Admcnishment, you'may do so by submitting, within 30 days of the date of service of this Letter of Admcnishment, namely March 29, 2012, the attached ?Request for an Office Conference? form. If an office conference is not requested, compliance with the'Letter of Admcnishment shall not constitute an admission of the violations described in the Letter of Admcnishment. Unless it is dismissed following an office conference or you receive other instructions from the Board in writing, Pharmacy Law requires that you maintain and have readily available for inspection a copy of this Letter of Admcnishment and any written corrective action plan, if any, for at least three years from the date of issuance at the top of this letter. The Letter of Admcnishment will be considered a public record for purposes of disclosure for three years from issuance. The issuance of this Letter of Admcnishment does not limit the board?s ability to pursue other disciplinary or administrative action under Business and Professions Code section 4315, subdivision If you have any questions regarding this Letter of Admcnishment, please contact Jennifer Sevilla, Associate Enforcement Analyst at (916) 574?7925. SinCerely Virginia Herold Executive Officer Board of Pharmacy BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Name, License No. CI 2011 51386 WHASUB DAVID SHIM, RPH 35663 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Whasub Shim while he was Pharmacist-in- Charge at Howard Drugs was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Whasub Shim while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Howard Drugs located at 5818 North Bellflower in Lakewood, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Howard Drugs did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Howard Drugs gave their McKesson account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Howard Drugs knowing what was being ordered. Howard Drugs depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate Specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/6/2011 1 PRIORITY $622.00 6/10/2011 2 PRIORITY $827.64 6/16/2011 3 PRIORITY $889.90 6/17/2011 4 PRIORITY $791.67 6/21/2011 5 PRIORITY $3,664.44 6/22/2011 6 PRIORITY $3,087.21 6/24/2011 7 PRIORITY $2433.00 7/6/2011 9 PRIORITY $1 .36729 7/14/2011 10 PRIORITY $613.27 7/19/2011 11 PRIORITY $515.46 8/4/2011 12 PRIORITY $1041.59 8/5/2011 13 PRIORITY $53.54 8/8/2011 14 PRIORITY $520.80 8/16/2011 15 PRIORITY $42.57 $16,470.38 This is a violation of pharmacy law. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Whasub Shim shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. lf RPH Whasub Shim timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Whasub Shim timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Whasub Shim fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the fine(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Whasub Shim within thirty (30) days of any such failure. ISSUED ON: February 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF 35.000.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number CI 2011 51387 Name, License No. DENNIS HO, RPH 52726 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. (6) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $5,000.00 CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Dennis H0 while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge at Waterman Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Dennis Ho while he was Pharmacist?Charge of Waterman Pharmacy located at 2150 Waterman Ave #104 in San Bernardino, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Waterman Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Waterman Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/24/2011 1 PRIORITY $40.40 6/15/2011 2 PRIORITY $237.59 6/30/2011 3 PRIORITY $73.59 7/6/2011 4 PRIORITY $75.26 7/7/2011 5 PRIORITY $165.38 7/12/2011 6 PRIORITY $795.38 7/13/2011 7 PRIORITY $169.97 7/15/2011 8 PRIORITY $3,816.93 7/21/2011 9 PRIORITY $2,502.23 7/25/2011 10 PRIORITY $70.02 7/25/2011 11 PRIORITY $202.30 7/26/2011 12 PRIORITY $70.37 7/29/2011 13 PRIORITY $350.10 8/5/2011 14 PRIORITY $133.92 8/10/2011 15 PRIORITY $500.85 8/11/2011 16 PRIORITY $83.98 8/18/2011 17 PRIORITY $134.37 9/6/2011 18 PRIORITY $802.91 9/12/2011 19 PRIORITY $146.19 9/13/2011 20 PRIORITY $411.72 9/27/2011 21 PRIORITY $694.40 $11,477.86 This is a violation of pharmacy law. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: 0 Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Dennis Ho shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. lf RPH Dennis Ho timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Dennis Ho timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. lf RPH Dennis Ho fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the fine(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Dennis Ho within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED 0N: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF 55.000.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 51388 Name, License No. DAVID MICHAEL JENSEN, RPH 30338 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage subd. CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? RPH David Jensen while he was Pharmacist-in- Charge at Valley View Rexall Drugs was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH David Jensen while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Valley View Rexall Drugs located at 13966 Valley View St in La Mirada, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen and HD Smith, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Valley View Rexall Drugs did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Valley View Rexall Drugs gave their Amerisource Bergen account number and HD Smith account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Valley View Rexall Drugs knowing what was being ordered. Valley View Rexall Drugs depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/11/2011 1 PRIORITY $887.82 7/12/2011 2 PRIORITY $39.38 7/13/2011 3 PRIORITY $978.24 7/20/2011 4 PRIORITY $85.44 7/25/2011 5 PRIORITY $105.03 7/25/2011 6 PRIORITY $171.53 8/10/2011 7 PRIORITY $93.16 8/26/2011 8 PRIORITY $112.51 8/26/2011 9 PRIORITY $298.49 9/6/2011 10 PRIORITY $535.28 9/13/2011 11 PRIORITY $183.71 9/14/2011 12 PRIORITY $1,015.34 9/15/2011 13 PRIORITY $221.49 9/20/2011 14 PRIORITY $1,024.65 10/4/2011 15 PRIORITY $168.14 10/5/2011 16 PRIORITY $213.74 $6,133.95 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: 0 Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH David Jensen shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH David Jensen timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH David Jensen timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH David Jensen fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the fine(s) shall be due and owing from RPH David Jensen within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED ON: February 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINEISI: 55.000.00 PAYMENT OF FINEISI DUE BY: March 24. 2012 STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR. California State Board of Pharmacy 1625 North Market Boulevard. Suite N219. Sacramento. CA 95834 Phone (916) 574-7900 Fax (916) 574-8518 February 23, 2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT MARY ASKANDER IBRAHIM 7256 SUNSET BLVD LOS ANGELES, CA 90046 RE: CI 2011 51389 MARY ASKANDER IBRAHIM RPH 40082 This LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT is being issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 4005 and section 4315 et seq. for failure to comply with the laws and regulations that govern the practice of pharmacy in California. (For exact language refer to the California Pharmacy Law and Index, located on the board's website at under Forms and Publications.) The Board of Pharmacy has completed its investigation in the above referenced matter. All documentation and/or statements relating to the investigation have been accepted and included in an Investigation Report on file in this of?ce. Facts contained in this report lead to the conclusion that the following violations of pharmacy laws or regulations have occurred: JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005,4315; - Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? RPH Mary Ibrahim while she was Pharmacist?in- Charge at Simon'S Discount Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Mary Ibrahim while she was Pharmacist?Charge of Simon's Discount Pharmacy located at 7256 Sunset Boulevard in Los Angeles, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from HD Smith, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Simon'S Discount Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Simon's Discount Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS 6/18/2011 PRIORITY $13.33 7/9/2011 PRIORITY $31.00 $44.33 This is a violation of pharmacy law if you wish to contest this Letter Of Admonishment, you may do so by submitting, within 30 days of the date of service of this Letter of Admonishment, namely March 24, 2012, the attached "Request for an Office Conference? form. If an Office conference is not requested, compliance with the Letter of Admonishment shall not constitute an admission of the violations described in the Letter of Admonishment. Unless it is dismissed following an office conference or you receive other instructions from the Board in writing, Pharmacy Law requires that you maintain and have readily available for inspection a copy of this Letter of Admonishment and any written corrective action plan, if any, for at least three years from the date of issuance at the top of this letter. The Letter of Admonishment will be considered a public record for purposes of disclosure for three years from issuance. The issuance of this Letter of Admonishment does not limit the board?s ability to pursue other disciplinary or administrative action under Business and Professions Code section 4315, subdivision If you have any questions regarding this Letter of Admonishment, please contact Jennifer Sevilla, Associate Enforcement Analyst at (916) 574-7925. Sincerely u- 244/ Virginia Herold Executive Officer Board of Pharmacy BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Cl 2011 51391 Name, License No. LISA CHAPLINSKY, RPH 49278 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 subd. Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Lisa Chaplinsky while she was Pharmacist? in-Charge at Los Altos Pharmacy At El Camino Hospital Inc was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Lisa Chaplinsky while she was Pharmacist-Charge of Los Altos Pharmacy At El Camino Hospital Inc located at 2500 Grant Rd Ste 1B20 in Mountain View, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Los Altos Pharmacy At El Camino Hospital Inc did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Los Altos Pharmacy At El Camino Hospital gave their McKesson account number 827415to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Los Altos Pharmacy At El Camino Hospital knowing what was being ordered. Los Altos Pharmacy At El Camino Hospital Inc depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/21/2011 1 PRIORITY $2,078.08 7/26/2011 2 PRIORITY $4,552.22 8/10/2011 3 PRIORITY $1826.82 8/19/2011 4 PRIORITY $217.73 8/25/2011 5 PRIORITY $347.52 8/31/2011 6 PRIORITY $1,640.79 9/7/2011 7 PRIORITY $820.40 9/19/2011 8 PRIORITY $429.17 9/21/2011 9 PRIORITY $112.50 9/27/2011 10 PRIORITY $426.11 9/30/2011 11 PRIORITY $73.71 10/3/2011 12 PRIORITY $99.43 $12,124.48 This is a violation of pharmacy law. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: 0 Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Lisa Chaplinsky shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow?up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Lisa Chaplinsky timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Lisa Chaplinsky timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Lisa Chaplinsky fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the fine(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Lisa Chaplinsky within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED 0N: FebruaryI 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $5.000.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 . DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 1625 North Market Boulevard. Surte N219, Sacramento. CA 95834 Phone {916) 574_7900 GOVERNOR EDMUND 6. BROWN JR. Fax (91 SI 574-8618 February 23, 2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT ROBERT THOMAS LEARK 2333 BORCHARD RD NEWBURY PARK, CA 91320 RE: Cl 2011 51392 ROBERT THOMAS LEARK RPH 60074 This LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT is being issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 4005 and section 4315 et seq. for failure to comply with the laws and regulations that govern the practice of pharmacy in California. (For exact language refer to the California Pharmacy Law and Index, located on the board?s website at under Forms and Publications.) The Board of Pharmacy has completed its investigation in the above referenced matter. All documentation and/or statements relating to the investigation have been accepted and included in an Investigation Report on file in this office. Facts contained in this report lead to the conclusion that the following violations of pharmacy laws or regulations have occurred: JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005, 4315; - Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Robert Leark while he was Pharmacist-in?Charge-?at Burt's Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Robert Leark while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Burt's Pharmacy located at 2333 Borchard Rd in Newbury Park, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to PriorityPharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd, Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Burt's Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Burt?s Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of?health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE NO 7/18/2011 1 PRIORITY $481.73 7/26/2011 2 PRIORITY $39.28 8/5/2011 3 PRIORITY $650.03 This is a violation of pharmacy law If you wish to contest this Letter of Admonishment, you may do so by submitting, within 30 days of the date of service of this Letter of Admonishment, namely March 24, 2012, the attached ?Request for an Of?ce Conference? form. If an office conference is not requested, compliance with the Letter of Admonishment shall not constitute an admission of the violations described in the Letter of Admonishment. Unless it is dismissed following an office conference or you receive other instructions from the Board in writing, Pharmacy Law requires that you maintain and have readily available for inspection a copy of this Letter of Admonishment and any written corrective action plan, if any, for at least three years from the date of issuance at the top of this letter. The Letter of Admonishment will be considered a public record for purposes of disclosure for three years from issuance. The issuance of this Letter of Admonishment does not limit the board's ability to pursue other disciplinary or administrative action under Business and Professions Code section 4315, subdivision if you have any questions regarding this Letter of Admonishment, please contact Linda Kapovich, Associate Enforcement Analyst at (916) 574-7924. Sincerely Virginia Herold Executive Officer Board of Pharmacy California State Board of Pharmacy 1625 North Market Boulevard, Suite N219, Sacramento, CA 95834 Phone (916) 574-7900 Fax (916) 574-8618 STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR. February 23,2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT TRANG ANGELA NGUYEN 8315 TORRELL WY SAN DIEGO, CA 92126 RE: CI 2011 51393 TRANG ANGELA NGUYEN RPH 59247 This LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT is being issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 4005 and section 4315 et seq. for failure to comply with the laws and regulations that govern the practice of pharmacy in California. (For exact language refer to the California Pharmacy Law and Index, located on the board?s website at under Forms and Publications.) I The Board of Pharmacy has completed its investigation in the above referenced matter. All documentation and/or statements relating to the investigation have been accepted and included in an Investigation Report on file in this of?ce. Facts contained in this report lead to the conclusion that the following violations of pharmacy laws or regulations have occurred: JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005, 4315; - FurnishingEangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Trang Nguyen while he was Pharmacist-in?Charge at JP Pharmacy Inc was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Trang Nguyen while he was Pharmacist-Charge ofJP Pharmacy Inc located at9188 Mira Mesa in San Diego, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. JP Pharmacy Inc - did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for'them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. JP Pharmacy Inc depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage in] I actually existed, or if lack-of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERSAMOUNT 6/1/2011 1 PRIORITY $375.10 6/1/201 2 PRIORITY $90.30 6/6/2011 3 PRIORITY $229.00 6/6/2011 4 PRIORITY $87.80 $782.20 This is a violation of pharmacy law. If you wish to contest this Letter of Admonishment, you may do so by submitting, within 30 days of the date of service of this Letter of Admonishment, namely March 24, 2012, the attached ?Request for an Office Conference" form. If an office conference is not requested, compliance with the Letter of Admonishment shall not constitute an admission of the violations described in the Letter of Admonishment. Unless it is dismissed following an office conference or you receive other instructions from the Board in writing, Pharmacy Law requires that you maintain and have readily available for inspection a copy of this Letter of Admonishment and any written corrective action plan, if any, for at least three years from the date of issuance at the top of this letter. The Letter of Admonishment will be considered a public record for purposes of disclosure for three years from issuance. The issuance of this Letter of Admonishment does not limit the board?s ability to pursue other disciplinary or administrative action under Business and Professions Code section 4315, subdivision If you have any questions regarding this Letter of Admonishment, please contact Linda Kap'ovich, Associate Enforcement Analyst at (916) 574?7924. Sincerely Virginia Herold Executive Officer Board of Pharmacy 1- N) California State Board of Pharmacy 1625 North Market Boulevard. Suite N219, Sacramento, CA 95834 Phone (916i 574-7900 Fax (916) 574-8618 ww.pharmacy.ca.gov STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR. February 23, 2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT VRIJLAL MANJI RAKHOLIA 727 SAN MARCOS BL #113 SAN MARCOS, CA 92078 RE: CI 2011 51398 VRIJLAL MANJI RAKHOLIA RPH 40598 This LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT is being issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 4005 and section 4315 et seq. for failure to comply with the laws and regulations that govern the practice of pharmacy in California. (For exact language refer to the California Pharmacy Law and index, located on the board?s website at under Forms and Publications.) The Board of PharmaCy has completed its investigation in the above referenced matter. All documentation and/or statements relating to the investigation have been accepted and included in an Investigation Report on file in this office. Facts contained in this report lead to the conclusion that the following violations of pharmacy laws or regulations have occurred: JURISDICTION: Prof. Code 4005, 4315; Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Non?compliant Sales to a whOlesaIer. RPH Vrijlal Rakholia while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge at Quality-Care Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Vrijlal Rakholia while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Quality?Care Pharmacy located at 727 San Marcos #113 in San Marcos, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal Health, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Quality-Care Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Quality-Care Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a I I- 1 If temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack Of the drug would result in a denial Of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE NO AMOUNT 5/18/2011 1 PRIORITY 6/14/2011 2 PRIORITY $161.56 6/22/2011 3 PRIORITY $343.73 This is a violation Of pharmacy law. If you wish to contest this Letter of Admonishment, you may do so by submitting, within 30 days of the date of service Of this Letter of Admonishment, namely March 24, 2012, the attached ?Request for an Office Conference? form. if an Office conference is not requested, compliance with the Letter of Admonishment shall not constitute an admission of the violations described in the Letter of Admonishment. Unless it is dismissed following an office conference or you receive other instructions from the Board in writing, Pharmacy Law requires that you maintain and have readily available for inspection a copy of this Letter of AdmOnishment and any written corrective action plan, if any, for at least three years from the date of issuance at the top of this letter. The Letter of Admonishment will be considered a public record for purposes of disclosure for three years from issuance. The issuance of this Letter of Admonishment does not limit the board?s ability to pursue other disciplinary or administrative action under Business and Professions Code section 4315, subdivision If you have any questions regarding this Letter of Admonishment, please contact Linda Kapovich, Associate Enforcement Analyst at (916) 574-7924. Sincerely .2 242/ Virginia Herold Executive Officer Board of Pharmacy - I California State Board of Pharmacy 1625 North Market Boulevard, Suite N219. Sacramento. CA 95834 Phone (916) 574-7900 . Fax (916) 574-8618 STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR. February 23, 2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT MARC LOUIS HORWITZ FOUNTAIN VALLEY MEDICAL CTR PHARMAC FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 RE: CI 2011 51399 MARC LOUIS HORWITZ RPH 40786 This LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT is being issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 4005 and section 4315 et seq. for failure to comply with the laws and regulations that govern the practice of pharmacy in California. (For exact language refer to the California Pharmacy Law and Index, located on the board?s website at under Forms and Publications.) The Board of Pharmacy has completed its investigation in the above referenced matter. All documentation and/or statements relating to the investigation have been-accepted and included in an Investigation Report on file in this office. Facts contained in this report lead to the conclusion that the following violations of pharmacy laws or regulations have occurred: JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005, 4315; - Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Marc Horwitz while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge at Fountain Valley Medical Center Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drugthat could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Marc Honivitz while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Fountain Valley Medical Center Pharmacy located at 11100 Warner Ave in Fountain Valley, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Fountain Valley Medical Center Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacyto purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Fountain Valley Medical Center Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the i I 1? i _shortaEs_, know what qugttityaofdangerous drugs was needed?to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack ofthe drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/22/2011 28848005 PRIORITY $484.00 This is a violation of pharmacy law If you wish to contest this Letter of Admonishment, you may do so by submitting, within 30 days of the date of service of this Letter of Admonishment, namely March 24, 2012, the attached ?Request for an Office Conference? form. If an of?ce conference is not requested, compliance with the Letter of Admonishment shall not constitute an admission of the violations described in the Letter of Admonishment. Unless it is dismissed following an office conference or you receive other instructions from the Board in writing, Pharmacy Law requires that you maintain and have readily available for inspection a copy of this Letter of Admonishment and any written corrective action plan, if any, for at least three years from 'the date of issuance at the top of this letter. The Letter of Admonishment will be considered a public record for purposes of disclosure for three years from issuance. The issuance of this Letter of Admonishment does not limit the board?s ability to pursue other disciplinary or administrative action under Business and Professions Code section 4315, subdivision If you have any questions regarding this Letter of Admonishment, please contact Linda Kapovich, Associate Enforcement Analyst at (916) 574-7924. Sincerely - Us .2, 212/ Virginia Herold Executive Officer Board of Pharmacy STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR. California State Board of Pharmacy 1625 North Market Boulevard, Suite N219, Sacramento. CA 95834 Phone (916) 574-7900 Fax (916) 574-8618 February 23, 2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT JAMES GEE 220 TALL OAK IRVINE, CA 92603 RE: CI 2011 51403 JAMES GEE RPH 44796 This LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT is being issued pursuant to BuSiness and Professions Code section 4005 and section 4315 et seq. for failure to comply with the laws and regulations that govern the practice of pharmacy in California. (For exact language refer to the California Pharmacy Law and Index, located on the board?s website at under Forms and Publications.) The Board of Pharmacy has completed its investigation in the above referenced matter. All documentation and/or statements relating to the investigation have been accepted and included in an investigation Report on file in this of?ce. Facts contained in this report lead to the conclusion that the following violations of pharmacy laws or regulations have occurred: Bus. Prof. Code 4005, 4315; - Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Non?cempliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH James Gee while he was Pharmacist? in-Charge at Cabrillo Park Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH James Gee while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Cabrillo Park Pharmacy located at 2212 4Th St #102 in Santa Ana, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical. Cabrillo Park Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short 'supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Cabrillo Park Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUN 7/25/2011 1 PRIORITY $34.23 'This is a violation of pharmacy law. If you wish to contest this Letter of Admonishment, you may do so by submitting, within 30 days of the date of service of this Letter of Admonishment, namely March 24, 2012, the attached ?Request for an Office Conference? form. If an office conference is not requested, compliance with the Letter of Admonishment shall not constitute an admission of the violations described in the Letter of Admonishment. Unless it is dismissed following an office conference or you receive other instructions from the Board in writing, Pharmacy Law requires that you maintain and have readily available for inspection a copy of this Letter of Ad monishment and any written corrective action plan, if any, for at least three years from the date of issuance at the top of this letter. The Letter of Admonishment will be considered a public record for purposes of disclosure for three years from issuance. The issuance of this Letter of Admonishment does not limit the board?s ability to pursue other disciplinary or administrative action under Business and Professions Code section 4315, subdivision If you have any questions regarding this Letter of Admonishment, please contact Linda I Kapovich, Associate Enforcement Analyst at (916) 574-7924. Sincerely 527,; 44% Virginia Herold Executive Officer Board of Pharmacy STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR California State Board of Pharmacy 1825 North Market Boulevard, Suite N219, Sacramento. CA 95834 Phone (916) 574-7900 Fax (916) 574-8618 February 23, 2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT WAYNE SORENSON - 29370 DRYDEN BARSTOW, CA 92311 RE: CI 2011 51409 WAYNE SORENSON RPH 21747 This LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT is being issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 4005 and section 4315 et seq. for failure to comply with the laws and regulations that govern the practice of pharmacy in California. ,(For exact language refer to the California Pharmacy Law and Index, located on the board?s website at under Forms and Publications.) The Board of Pharmacy has completed its investigation in the above referenced matter. All documentation and/or statements relating to the investigation have been accepted and included in an Investigation Report on file in this office. Facts contained in this report lead to the conclusion that the following violations of pharmacy laws or regulations have occurred: JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005, 4315; - Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage . Non-compliant sales to a wholesaler. RPH Wayne Sorenson while he was Pharmacist-in?Charge at Teplow Drugs was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could. result in the denialof health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Wayne Sorenson while he was Pharmacist~Charge of Teplow Drugs located at 404 Main St in Barstow, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd, Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Teplow Drugs did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Teplow Drugs depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage I II "i actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 5/18/2011 1 PRIORITY $63.00 5/18/2011 2 PRIORITY $274.70 6/2/2011 3 PRIORITY $196.10 7/13/2011 4 PRIORITY $110.79 7/29/201 1 5 PRIORITY $36.10 10/10/2011 6 PRIORITY $195.14 $875.83 This is a violation of pharmacy law. If you wish to contest this Letter of Admonishment, you may do so by submitting, within 30 days of the date of service of this Letter of Admonishment, namely March 24, 2012, the attached ?Request for an Office Conference? form. If an office conference is not requested, compliance with the Letter of Admonishment shall not constitute an admission of the violations described in the Letter of Admonishment. Unless it is dismissed following an office conference or you receive other instructions from the Board in writing, Pharmacy Law requires that you maintain and have readily available for inspection a copy of this Letter of Admonishment and any written corrective action plan, if any, for at least three years from the date of issuance at the top of this letter. The Letter of Admonishment will be considered a public record for purposes of disclosure for three years from issuance. The issuance of this Letter of Admonishment does not limit the board?s ability to pursue other disciplinary or administrative action under Business and Professions Code section 4315, subdivision - If you have any questions regarding this Letter of Admonishment, please contact Linda Kapovich, Associate Enforcement Analyst at (916) 574-7924. Sincerely Virginia Herold Executive Officer Board of Pharmacy 1 California State Board of Pharmacy 1625 North Market Boulevard. Suite N219. Sacramento, CA 95834 Phone (916) 574-7900 Fax (916i 574-8618 STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR. February 23, 2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT PETER NABIL TAWFIK 15722 SAN MARCO PL BAKERSFIELD, CA 93314 RE: CI 2011 51413 PETER NABIL TAWFIK RPH 59522 This LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT is being issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 4005 and section 4315 et seq. for failure to comply with the laws and regulations that govern the practice of pharmacy in California. ,(For exact language refer to the California Pharmacy Law and index, located on the board?s website at under Forms and Publications.) The Board of Pharmacy has completed its investigation in the above referenced matter. All documentation and/or statements relating to the investigation have been accepted and included in an investigation Report on file in this office. Facts contained in this report lead to the conclusion that the following violations of pharmacy laws or regulations have occurred: JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005, 4315; - Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Peter Tawfik while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge at Kern Avenue Pharmacy was ?not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Peter Taw?k while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Kern Avenue Pharmacy located at 205 Kern Ave in Mc Farland, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Kern Avenue Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they - wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Kern Avenue Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific 5 shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lacR'IOf the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice . numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/9/2011 1 PRIORITY 511955 3/3/2011 _2 PRIORITY $621.73 5/30/2011 3 PRIORITY $255.07 7/5/2011 4 PRIORITY $322.07 7/11/2011 5 PRIORITY $131.77 7/19/2011 3 PRIORITY $12.32 $1.452.32 This is a violation of pharmacy law. If you wish to contest this Letter of Admonishment, you may do so by submitting. within 30 days Of the date of service of this Letter of Admonishment, namely March 24, 2012, the attached ?Request for an Office Conference? form. If an office conference is not requested, compliance with the Letter of shall nOt constitute an admission Of the violations described in the Letter Of Unless it is dismissed following an Office conference or you receive other instructions from the Board in?writing, Pharmacy Law requires that you maintain and have readily available for inspection a copy of this Letter of Admonishment and any written corrective action plan, if any, for at least three years from the date of issuance at the top of this letter. The Letter of Admonishment will be considered a public record for purposes of disclosure for three years from issuance. The issuance of this Letter of Admonishment does not limit the board?s ability to pursue other disciplinary or administrative action under Business and Professions Code section 4315, subdivision If you have any questions regarding this Letter of please contact Linda Kapovich, Associate Enforcement Analyst at (916) 574-7924. Sincerely 2122 Virginia Herold Executive Officer Board of Pharmacy BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Cl 2011 51414 Name, License No. ALAN LEE WONG, RPH 32557 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4301, subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $1,000.00 subd. CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Alan Wong while he was Pharmacist-in- Charge at The Medicine Shoppe was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Alan Wong while he was Pharmacist-Charge of The Medicine Shoppe located at 282 Village Square in Orinda, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal Health, a Wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. The Medicine Shoppe did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition The Medicine Shoppe gave their Cardinal Health account number #12074 to Priority and authorization to order drugs without The Medicine Shoppe knowing what was being ordered. The Medicine Shoppe depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 8/8/2011 PRIORITY $2,375.06 8/29/2011 2 PRIORITY $526.04 9/6/2011 3 PRIORITY $288.64 9/21/2011 4 PRIORITY $584.55 $3,774.29 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in?an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Alan Wong shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Alan Wong timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Alan Wong timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. lf RPH Alan Wong fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the fine(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Alan Wong within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED 0N: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $1 .000.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Cl 2011 51415 Name, License No. DIPAKBHAI PATEL, RPH 38540 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Dipakbhai Patel while he was Pharmacist- in-Charge at Vermillion's Drug #3 was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Dipakbhai Patel while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Vermillion's Drug #3 located at 1942 Anaheim St in Long Beach, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal Health, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Vermillion's Drug #3 did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Vermillion?s Drug #3 gave their Cardinal Health account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Vermillion?s Drug #3 knowing what was being ordered. Vermillion's Drug #3 depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 5/26/2011 1 PRIORITY $118.80 6/6/2011 2 PRIORITY $96.30 6/7/2011 3 PRIORITY $98.30 6/23/2011 4 PRIORITY $343.73 6/23/2011 5 PRIORITY $336.49 7/1/2011 6 PRIORITY $84.15 7/6/2011 7 PRIORITY $273.56 7/7/2011 8 PRIORITY $97.29 7/18/2011 9 PRIORITY $24.90 8/1/2011 10 PRIORITY $385.97 8/25/2011 11 PRIORITY $160.65 9/7/2011 12 PRIORITY $31.52 9/21/2011 13 PRIORITY $332.01 10/124/2011 14 PRIORITY $1,004.85 10/25/2011 15 PRIORITY $1,256.06 11/1/2011 16 PRIORITY $3,035.16 11/2/2011 17 PRIORITY $430.31 11/7/2011 18 PRIORITY $956.46 11/7/2011 19 PRIORITY $1,159.43 11/14/2011 22 $956.46 $11,182.40 This is a violation of pharmacy law. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Dipakbhai Patel shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Dipakbhai Patel timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Dipakbhai Patel timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. lf RPH Dipakbhai Patel fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the fine(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Dipakbhai Patel within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF 35.000130 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Cl 2011 51416 Name, License No. PAUL STEPHAN, RPH 37386 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $5,000.00 CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Paul Stephan while he was Pharmacist-in- Charge at Care Rite Inc was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Paul Stephan while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Care Rite Inc located at 3500 East Broadway in Long Beach, CA did not have'the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Care Rite did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Care Rite gave their AmeriSource Bergen account number 012113985 to Priority and authorization to - order drugs without Care Rite inc knowing what was being ordered. Care Rite depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 5/31/2011 1 PRIORITY $565.05 3/3/2011 2 PRIORITY $591.53 5/9/2011 3 PRIORITY $177.88 6/15/2011 4 PRIORITY $219.51 5/13/2011 5 PRIORITY $108.78 13/22/2011 5 PRIORITY $103.93 15/29/2011 7 PRIORITY $73.05 7/9/2011 8 PRIORITY $327.20 7/13/2011 9 PRIORITY $101.39 7/25/2011 10 PRIORITY $420.12 7/25/2011 11 PRIORITY $202.30 8/3/2011 12 PRIORITY $550.07 8/8/2011 13 PRIORITY $93.16 8/11/2011 14 PRIORITY $141.95 8/23/2011 15 PRIORITY $154.37 8/29/2011 16 PRIORITY $33.17 9/1/2011 17 PRIORITY $317.22 9/8/2011 18 PRIORITY $176.06 $4,459.92 This is a violation of pharmacy law. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: - Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Paul Stephan shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. lf RPH Paul Stephan timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Paul Stephan timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Paul Stephan fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Paul Stephan within thirty (30) days of any such failure. 815113-15??qu t. ,2 ea m. -.-. I . Jr. -. . 0-11 I . . -.-.-.- .. v? . . r. 5pm; $31,245 33,3,? ?r-tig'l . . STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS GOVERNOR EDMUND (3. BROWN JR. Galifornia State Board of Pharmacy 1625 North Market Boulevard. Suite N219. Sacramento, CA 95834 Phone (916) 574-7900 Fax (916) 574-8518 February 23, 2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT LISA KAY SHELLEY PO BOX 1812 WOODLAND, CA 95776 RE: Cl 2011 51417 LISA KAY SHELLEY RPH 32863 This LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT is being issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 4005 and section 4315 et seq. for failure to comply with the laws and regulations that govern the practice of pharmacy in California. (For exact language refer to the California Pharmacy Law and Index, located on the board?s website at under FOrms and Publications.) The Board of Pharmacy has completed its investigation in the above referenced matter. All documentation and/or statements relating to the investigation have been accepted and included in an Investigation Report on file in this office. Facts contained in this report lead to the conclusion that the following violations of pharmacy laws or regulations have occurred: JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005, 4315; - Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Non?compliant Sales to a wholesaler- RPH Lisa Shelley while she was Pharmacist-in-Charge at Corner Drug Company Inc was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Lisa Shelley while she was Pharmacist-Charge of Corner Drug Company Inc located at 602 Main St in Woodland, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from McKesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Corner Drug Company Inc did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority PharmaceutiCals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Corner Drug Company Inc depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific . shortages, if a tempera?ryishortage actually existed, or if lack: of the drug would result in *a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the folloWing dates and invoice numbers: QRTE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 5/11/2011 1 PRIORITY $913.50 3/10/2011 2 PRIORITY $1,657.50 7/25/2011 3 PRIORITY $2,018.38 7/25/2011 4 PRIORITY $2,406.69 7/25/2011 5 PRIORITY $1,562.62 7/28/2011 6 PRIORITY $663.41 $9,222.10 This is a violation of pharmacy law If you wish to contest this Letter of Admonishment, yOu may do so by submitting, within 30 days of the date of service of this Letter of Admonishment, namely the attached ?Request for an Office Conference" form. If an of?ce conference is not requested, compliance with the Letter of Admonishment shall not constitute an admission of the violations described in the Letter of Admonishment. Unless it is-dismissed following an office conference or you receive other instructions from the Board in writing, Pharmacy Law requires that you maintain and have readily available for inspection a copy of this Letter of Admonishment and any written corrective action plan, if any, for at least three years from the date of issuance at the top of this letter. The Letter of Admonishment will be considered a public record for purposes of disclosure for three years from issuance. The issuanceof this Letter of Admonishment does not limit the board?s ability to pursue other disciplinary or administrative action under Business and Professions Code section 4315, subdivision If you have any questions regarding this Letter of Admonishment, please contact Jennifer Sevilla, Associate Enforcement Analyst at (916) 574-7925. Sincerely a 2212/ Virginia Herold Executive Officer Board of Pharmacy BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Cl 2011 51418 Name, License No. MEHRDAD REYHANI RPH 45597 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $5,000.00 CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- RPH Mehrdad Reyhani while he was Pharmacist- in-Charge at Lauden Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Mehrdad Reyhani while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Lauden Pharmacy located at 1820 41St Avenue Suite in Capitola, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical, located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Lauden Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Lauden Pharmacy gave their AmeriSource Bergen account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Lauden Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Lauden Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoices: Date INVOICE WHLSE AMOUNT COMMENTS 8/1 /2011 1 PRIORITY $231.22 8/4/2011 2 PRIORITY $464.20 8/10/2011 3 PRIORITY $249.38 8/26/2011 4 PRIORITY $132.66 8/30/2011 5 PRIORITY $12.90 9/1 /2011 6 PRIORITY $272.70 9/21/2011 7 PRIORITY $212.96 10/6/2011 8 PRIORITY $143.10 10/26/2011 9 PRIORITY $181.97 10/27/2011 10 PRIORITY $114.51 10/27/2011 11 PRIORITY $120.35 11/1/2011 12 PRIORITY $332.24 11/3/2011 13 PRIORITY $334.31 11/7/2011 15 PRIORITY $3,256.04 11/10/2011 17 PRIORITY $276.40 11/10/2011 18 PRIORITY $483.62 11/14/2011 19 PRIORITY $1400.74 11/15/2011 20 PRIORITY $1117.44 11/18/2011 21 PRIORITY $454.40 11/21/2011 22 PRIORITY $2661.04 11/22/2011 23 PRIORITY $769.38 11/30/2011 24 PRIORITY $476.24 11/30/2011 25 PRIORITY $1,243.38 11/30/2011 26 PRIORITY $540.84 12/5/2011 27 PRIORITY $262.02 12/14/2011 28 PRIORITY $715.05 $16,459.09 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: a Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Mehrdad Reyhani shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Mehrdad Reyhani timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Mehrdad Reyhani timer enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Mehrdad Reyhani fails to timely seek pre?approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Mehrdad Reyhani within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED ON: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF 55.000.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 . BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Cl 2011 51419 Name, License No. CLARENCE BUN HOI YUK, RPH 31217 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage $5,000.00 CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- RPH Clarence Yuk while he was Pharmacist-in- Charge at Greenhouse Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Clarence Yuk while he was Pharmacist?Charge of Greenhouse Pharmacy located at 1516 Noriega Street in San Francisco, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Greenhouse Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge Of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Greenhouse Pharmacy gave their McKesson account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Greenhouse Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Greenhouse Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity Of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial Of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE - DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 8/15/2011 1 PRIORITY $935.00 8/16/20? 2 PRIORITY $1123.38 8/25/2011 3 PRIORITY $198.59 8/29/2011 4 PRIORITY $844.78 8/302011 5 PRIORITY $325.41 8/31/2011 8 PRIORITY $71.83 9/1/2011 7 PRIORITY $820.40 9/13/2011 8 PRIORITY $426.09 9/15/2011 '9 PRIORITY $210.04 9/27/2011 10 PRIORITY $632.81 9/29/2011 11 PRIORITY $421.88? 9/29/2011 12 PRIORITY $78.48 $5,886.67 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: a Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Clarence Yuk shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. lf RPH Clarence Yuk timely seeks pre?approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Clarence Yuk timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. lf RPH Clarence Yuk . fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Clarence Yuk within thirty (30) days of any such failure. . rigmyumm Jasmine =53- Ir? I 3 Rwy-fearinw?warww r31 if; .- I 1 California State Board of Pharmacy 2:53;: Suite N219, Sacramento. CA 95834 GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Fax (916) 574-3618 February 23, 2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT WAI-KUEN CHAK PHARMACY ALHAMBRA, CA 91801 RE: CI 2011 51420 WAI-KUEN CHAK RPH 37586 This LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT is being issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 4005 and section 4315 et seq. for failure to comply with the laws and regulations that govern the practice of pharmacy in California. (For exact language refer to the California Pharmacy Law and Index, located on the board?s website at under Forms and Publications.) The Board of Pharmacy has completed its investigation in the above referenced matter. All documentation and/or statements relating to the investigation have been accepted and included in an Investigation Report on file in this office. Facts contained in this report lead to the conclusion that the following violations of pharmacy laws or regulations have occurred: JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005, 4315; - Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Wai-Kuen Chak while he was Pharmacist?in?Charge at Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Wai-Kuen Chak while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Pharmacy located at 1234 Garfield Ave No 102 in Alhambra, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical. Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually eXisted, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus 2 increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: DATE INVOICE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 8/10/2011 1 PRIORITY $78.77 9/6/2011 2 PRIORITY $514.35 $593.12 This is a violation of pharmacy law. if you wish to contest this Letter of Admonishment, you may do so by submitting, within 30 days of the date of service of this Letter of Admonishment, namely March 24, 2012, the attached "Request for an Office Conference? form. If an office conference is not requested, compliance with the Letter of Admonishment shall not constitute an admission of the violations described in the Letter of Admonishment. Unless it is dismissed following an of?ce conference or you receive other instructions from the Board in writing, Pharmacy Law requires that you maintain and have readiiy available for inspection a copy of this Letter of Admonishment and any written corrective action plan, if any, for at least three years from the date of issuance at the top of this letter. The Letter of Admonishment will be considered a public record for purposes of disclosure for three years from issuance. The issuance of this Letter of Admonishment does not limit the board?s ability to pursue other disciplinary or administrative action under Business and Professions Code section 4315, subdivision If you have any questions regarding this Letter of Admonishment, please contact Linda Kapo'vich, Associate Enforcement Analyst at (916) 574-7924. Sincerely EM Virginia Herold Executive Officer Board of Pharmacy BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION Citation Number Name, License No CI 2011 51422 GERALD GREGORY MEDLEY RPH 31827 Uu?s?o?l?crl?ON: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; ccn, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATIONCODE SECTION OFFENSE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 subd.? Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non?compliantSales to a wholesaler. RPH Gerald Medley while he was Pharmacist- -in?Charge of Sea View Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in guantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Gerald Medley while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge of Sea View Pharmacy located at 665 Camino de Los Mares #101 in San Clemente, CA, did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from AmerisourceBergen wholesaler, and resold them Priority Pharmaceuticals, located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd. in San Diego, CA. Sea View pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceutical to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Sea View Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of the dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage of the drugs on following dates and invoice numbers: 1. Invoice dated 5/13/2011 for a total of $552.30 2. Invoice dated 6/9/2011 for a total of $374.00. Note: quantity is 10 25 1ml of Phenylephrine single dose Vials for a total of 450 vials. 3. Invoice 3, dated 6/21/2011 for a total of $53.02 This is a violation of pharmacy law. . 1. .. . w. California State Board of Pharmacy 1625 North Market Boulevard. Suite N219. Sacramento, CA 95834 Phone {916) 574-7900 Fax (916) 574-8618 February 23, 2012 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT STEVENSON VAN NGUYEN 1855 ALUM ROCK AVE SUITE A SAN JOSE, CA 95116 RE: CI 2011 51423 STEVENSON VAN NGUYEN RPH 57678 This LETTER OF ADMONISHMENT is being issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 4005 and section 4315 et seq. for failure to comply with the laws and regulations that govern the practice of pharmacy in California. (For exact language refer to the California Pharmacy Law and Index, located on the board's website at Under Forms and Publications.) The Board of Pharmacy has completed its investigation in the above referenced matter. All documentation and/or statements relating to the investigation have been accepted and included in an Investigation Report on file in this office. Facts contained in this report lead to the conclusion that the following violations of pharmacy laws or regulations have occurred: JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005,4315; - Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? RPH Stevenson Nguyen .while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge at Alum Rock Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states apharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Stevenson Nguyen while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Alum Rock Pharmacy located at 1855 Alum Rock Ave Ste A in San Jose, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical. Alum Rock Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify thedrugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacywas acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Alum Rook Pharmacy depended on Priorin to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drugwould result in STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR. If?. . lIii I a denia?f health care?us increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: QUE INVOICE N0 WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/30/2011 1 PRIORITY $10.516.17 7/25/2011 2 PRIORITY $272.65 7/23/2011 3 PRIORITY $663.41 $11,452.23 This is a violation Of pharmacy law If you wish to contest this Letter of Admonishment, you may do so by submitting, within 30 days of the date Of service Of this Letter of Admonishment, namely March 24, 20.12, the attached ?Request for an Office Conference" form. If an office conference is not requested, compliance with the Letter of Admonishment shall not constitute an admission of the violations described in the Letter of Admonishment. Unless it is dismissed following an office conference or you receive other instructions from the Board in writing, Pharmacy Law requires that you maintain and have readily available for inspection a copy of this Letter of Admonishment and any written corrective action plan, if any, for at least three years from the date of issuance at the top Of this letter. The Letter of Admonishment will be considered a public record for purposes of disclosure for three years from issuance. The issuance of this Letter of Admonishment does not limit the board's ability to pursue other disciplinary or administrative action under Business and Professions Code section 4315, subdivision If you have any questions regarding this Letter of Admonishment, please contact Jennifer Sevilla, Associate Enforcement Analyst at (916) 574?7925. Sincerely Virginia Herold Executive Officer Board'of Pharmacy BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Cl 2011 51424 Name, License No. FRANK YEP, RPH 23764 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Bus. Prof. Code Records of Dangerous Drugs and $1,000.00 4081/Bus. Prof. Code Devices Kept Open for Inspection; 4332 Maintenance of Records, Current Inventory/Maintaining Prescriptions, Other Drug Records on Premises, Open to Inspection; CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Frank Yep while he was Pharmacist-in? Charge at Bonita Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Frank Yep while he was Pharmacist?Charge of Bonita Pharmacy located at 4190 Bonita Rd Ste 101 in Bonita, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from McKesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Bonita Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Bonita Pharmacy gave their McKesson account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Bonita Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Bonita Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 7/12/2011 1 PRIORITY $179.51 7/18/2011 2 PRIORITY $790.76 7/21/2011 3 PRIORITY $685.74 8/5/2011 4 PRIORITY $1,501.49 8/9/2011 5 PRIORITY $570.94 8/10/2011 6 PRIORITY $112.50 8/15/2011 7 PRIORITY $564.03 8/24/2011 8 PRIORITY $143.66 8/26/2011 9 PRIORITY $2,289.09 9/13/2011 10 PRIORITY $72.50 9/15/2011 12 PRIORITY $221.74 $7131.96 This is a violation of pharmacy law. Non-Compliant Record Keeping._ RPH Frank Yep while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge of Bonita Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Profession Code section 4081 subd. which states all records of manufacturer of sale, acquisition or disposition of dangerous drugs or dangerous devices shall be at all times during business hours open to inspection by authorized officers of the law, and shall be preserved for at least 3 years from the date of making and Business and Professions Code section 4332 which states any person who fails, neglects, or refuses to maintain the records required by Section 4081 or who, when called upon by an authorized of?cer or a member of the Board, fails, neglects, or refuses to produce or provide the records within a reasonable time, or who willfully produces or furnishes records that are false, is guilty of a misdemeanor.. Specifically, RPH Frank Yep while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge of Bonita Pharmacy located at 4190 Bonita Rd Ste 101 in Bonita, CA did not provide invoice 7, dated 8/15/2011, for $564,03 sold to to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. This is a violation of pharmacy law. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of CalifOrnia Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Frank Yep shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. lf RPH Frank Yep timely seeks pre?approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation for violation of Business and Professions Code section 4126.5 subd. shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Frank Yep timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation for violation of Business and Professions Code section 4126.5 subd. shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. lf RPH Frank Yep fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the fine(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Frank Yep within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED 0N: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $6.000.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24, 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Cl 2011 51425 Name, License No. KEVIN NHATHUY QUANG TRAN, RPH 56316 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Bus. Prof. Code Records of Dangerous Drugs and $3,000.00 4081/Bus. Prof. Code Devices Kept Open for Inspection; 4332 Maintenance of Records, Current Inventory/Maintaining Prescriptions, Other Drug Records on Premises, Open to Inspection; CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Kevin Nhathuy Tran while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge at TLC Xpress Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Kevin Nhathuy Tran while he was Pharmacist-Charge of TLC Xpress Pharmacy located at 10810 Warner Ave Ste 3-4 in Fountain Valley, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from HD Smith and Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. TLC Xpress Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition TLC Xpress Pharmacy gave their HD Smith and/or AmeriSource Bergen account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without TLC Xpress Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. TLC Xpress Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 10/5/2011 7 PRIORITY $413.40 $413.40 And also: Date Invoice No. Wholesaler Amount 7/25/2011 1 Priority $173.83 8/15/2011 2 Priority $215.46 8/31/2011 3 Priority $186.30 9/6/2011 4 Priority $390.77 9/15/2011 5 Priority $683.10 9/20/2011 6 Priority $1,024.65 $2674.1 1 This is a violation of pharmacy law. Non-compliant Maintenance of Records for Dangerous Drugs. RPH Kevin Tran while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge of TLC Xpress Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4081 subd. which states: all records of manufacture and of sale, acquisition, or disposition of dangerous drugs or dangerous devices shall be at all times during business hours open to inspection by authorized officers of the law, and shall be preserved for at least three years from the date of making. And Business and Professions Code section 4332 which states: Any person who fails, neglects, or refuses to maintain the records required by Section 4081 or who, when called upon by an authorized of?cer or a member of the board, fails, neglects, or refuses to produce or provide the records within a reasonable time, or who willfully produces or furnishes records that are false, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Specifically, RPH Kevin Tran while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge of TLC Xpress Pharmacy located at 10810 Warner Ave Ste 3-4 in Fountain Valley, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from HD Smith and Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. RPH Kevin Tran while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge of TLC Xpress Pharmacy did provide the following invoices when requested by the Board: Date Invoice No. Wholesaler Amount 7/25/2011 1 Priority $173.83 8/15/2011 2 Priority $215.46 8/31/2011 3 Priority $186.30 9/6/201 1 4 Priority $390.77 9/15/201 1 5 Priority $683.10 9/20/201 1 6 Priority $1 ,024.65 $2674.11 This is a violation of pharmacy law. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Kevin Tran shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Kevin Tran timely seeks pre?approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics courSe, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation for violation of Business and Professions Code section 4126.5 subd. shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Kevin Tran timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation for violation of Business and Professions Code section 4126.5 subd. shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. lf RPH Kevin Tran fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the fine(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Kevin Tran within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED ON: February 27. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF 58.000130 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 28. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Order of Abatement Citation Number Cl 2011 51426 Name, License No. DIETER STEINMETZ, RPH 46478 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 subd. Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Bus. Prof. Code 4059 subd. furnishing of dangerous drug or device $1,000.00 by a manufacturer, wholesaler, or under sales and purchase records that correctly give the date, the names and addresses of the supplier and the buyer, the drug or device, and its quantity Bus. Prof. Code 4301 Unprofessional Conduct - Assist in $3,000.00 subd. (0) violation CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? RPH Dieter Steinmetz while he was Pharmacist- in?Charge at Coast Compounding Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities suf?cient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Dieter Steinmetz while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Coast Compounding Pharmacy located at 1838 8 Coast Hwy in Oceanside, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Coast Compounding Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Coast Compounding Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage aCtually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/6/2011 2830 PRIORITY $2,731.25 6/7/2011 2832 PRIORITY $3,862.37 6/9/2011 2834 PRIORITY $93.28 6/9/2011 2835 PRIORITY $1,217.87 6/13/2011 2839 PRIORITY $484.55 6/14/2011 2840 PRIORITY $242.09 6/16/2011 2847 PRIORITY $1,880.73 6/20/2011 2850 PRIORITY $447.22 6/22/2011 2855 PRIORITY $207.15 6/29/2011 2860 PRIORITY $8,759.31 7/1/2011 2866 PRIORITY $1 ,95327 7/5/2011 2868 PRIORITY $85.14 7/7/2011 2874 PRIORITY $1 .706.65 7/18/2011 2889 PRIORITY $888.80 7/21/2011 2895 PRIORITY $1 .026.56 7/26/2011 2902 PRIORITY $331.71 8/1/2011 2906 PRIORITY $189.95 8/3/2011 2910 PRIORITY $93.26 8/4/2011 2912 PRIORITY $1,347.76 8/12/2011 2924 PRIORITY $1,260.00 8/23/2011 2936 PRIORITY $323.57 9/9/201 1 2954 PRIORITY $272.70 9/14/2011 2962 PRIORITY $706.08 10/6/2011 2990 PRIORITY $1,917.67 10/11/2011 2997 PRIORITY $695.76 $32.724,70 This is a violation of pharmacy law Non-compliant Furnishing of Dangerous Drugs- RPH Dieter Steinmetz while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge of Coast Compounding Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4059 subdivision which states a person may furnish dangerous drugs by a manufacturer, wholesaler, or a pharmacy to each other or to a physician, dentist, podiatrist, optometrist, veterinarian, naturopathic doctor pursuant to Section 3640.7 under sales and purchase records that correctly give the date, the names and addresses of the supplier and the buyer, the drugs or device, and its quantity, Specifically, RPH Dieter Steinmetz while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge of Coast Compounding Pharmacy located at 1838 8 Coast Hwy in Oceanside, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Mckesson, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Coast Compounding Pharmacy did not have sales records the correctly give the quantity of the dangerous drugs on the following dates and invoices number: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 6/6/2011 2830 PRIORITY $2,731.25 6/7/2011 2832 PRIORITY $3,862.37 6/9/2011 2834 PRIORITY $93.28 6/9/2011 2835 PRIORITY $1,217.87 6/13/2011 2839 PRIORITY $484.55 6/14/2011 2840 PRIORITY $242.09 6/16/2011 2847 PRIORITY $1,880.73 6/20/2011 2850 PRIORITY $447.22 6/22/2011 2855 PRIORITY $207.15 6/29/2011 2860 PRIORITY $8,759.31 7/1/2011 2866 PRIORITY $1,953.27 7/5/2011 2868 PRIORITY $85.14 7/7/2011 2874 PRIORITY $1,706.65 7/18/2011 2889 PRIORITY $888.80 7/21/2011 2895 PRIORITY $1026.56 7/26/2011 2902 PRIORITY $331.71 8/1/2011 2906 PRIORITY $189.95 8/3/2011 2910 PRIORITY $93.26 8/4/2011 2912 PRIORITY $1,347.76 8/12/2011 2924 PRIORITY $1,260.00 8/23/2011 2936 PRIORITY $323.57 9/9/2011 2954 PRIORITY $272.70 9/14/2011 2962 PRIORITY $706.08 10/6/2011 2990 PRIORITY $1,917.67 10/11/2011 2997 PRIORITY $695.76 $32.724.70 Unprofessional Conduct as it relates to Non-compliant Sales to wholesalers? RPH Dieter Steinmetz while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge of Coast Compounding Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Profession Code section 4301 subdivision (0), which states violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter or of the applicable federal and state laws and regulations governing pharmacy, including regulations established by the Board or by any other state or federal regulatory agency as it relates to Business and Professions code 4126.5. Specifically, RPH Dieter Steinmetz while he was Pharmacist-in- Charge of Coast Compounding Pharmacy located at 1838 Coast Hwy in Oceanside, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them multiple times on the same day from McKesson, a wholesaler, located at 9501 S. Nonrvalk Blvd. in Santa Fe Springs, CA circumventing the allocation system instituted by the drug manufacturer for drugs in short supply, thus increasing the shortage of the dangerous drugs and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Blvd. in San Diego, CA on the following dates and mvorces: 1. Coast Compounding for invoice 2833, dated 6/7/11 purchased Epinephrine 1mg/ml 7 times from McKesson on the same date. 2. Coast Compounding for invoice 2832, dated 6/8/11 purchased Phenylephrine 10mg injection from McKesson f13 times on the same date. 3. Coast compounding for invoice 2906, dated 8/2/11 purchased Sodium Acetate injection from McKesson 4 times on the same date. 4. Coast Compounding for invoice #2924, dated 8/12/2011 purchased 10% 12 times frOm McKesson on the same date. 5. Coast Compounding for invoice 2936, dated 8/23/ 1011 purchased Aminocaproic 5gm.injection from McKesson 4 times on the same date. 6 . Coast Compounding for invoice 2990, dated 10/6/2011 purchased Calcium Gluconate 10% injection from McKesson 4 times on the same date. 7. Coast Compounding for invoice 2997, dated 10/1/11 purchased Sodium acetate 40meq from McKesson 4 times on the same date. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: - Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Dieter Steinmetz shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Dieter Steinmetz timely seeks pre?approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Dieter Steinmetz timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Dieter Steinmetz fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Dieter Steinmetz within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED 0N: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Name, License No. Cl 2011 51427 FREDERICK RICHARD ANDERSON JR, RPH 30089 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Bus. Prof. Code 4059.5 A dangerous drug or dangerous device $2,500.00 subd. (e)ITitle 21, CFR shall not be transferred, sold, or 205.4 delivered to a person outside this state/Wholesale drug distributor licensing requirement Bus. Prof. Code 4059.5 Dangerous drugs and devices may only $2,500.00 subd. be ordered and sahll be delivered to licensed premises and signed for and received by a CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Frederick Anderson while he was pharmacist-in-Charge of Medical Arts Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Specifically, RPH Frederick Anderson while he was pharmacist ?in-Charge of Medical Arts Pharmacy located at 8851 Center Dr No 110 in La Mesa, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Cardinal, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical, located at 4040 Sorrento Blvd., San Diego CA 92121: Dubin Medical located at 970 Turquoise St. San Diego, CA 92109; Gulf Coast Pharmaceuticals, located at 995 North Halstead Rd., Ocean Springs MS 39564 and Vital Health Care located at 11 East Lathrop Ave. Savannah, GA 31415. Medical Arts Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed these wholesalers to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for these wholesalers. Medical Arts Pharmacy depended on the wholesalers to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESLER AMOUNT 4/21/2011 421111 PRIORITY $268.03 1/20/2010 12010 PRIORITY $4,383.00 1/14/2010 11410 PRIORITY $5,389.20 1/11/2010 1112010 PRIORITY $6033.89 1/5/2010 1510 PRIORITY $549.74 12/22/2010 122209 PRIORITY $6,119.50 12/21/2009 122109 PRIORITY $3,476.50 12/15/2009 121509 PRIORITY $2,123.22 12/8/2009 12809 PRIORITY $9058.00 11/1/3009 113009 PRIORITY $5,014.32 11/23/2009 112309 PRIORITY $5,295.00 11/19/2009 111909 PRIORITY $2.415.00 11/18/2009 111809 PRIORITY $2,893.00 10/1 /2709 28 PRIORITY $625.00 9/1/2009 9 PRIORITY $800.00 1/26/2009 7 PRIORITY $1,710.00 1/26/2009 6 PRIORITY $3,645.00 1/14/2009 5 PRIORITY $2000.00 $61,798.40 6/14/2010 61410 DUBIN MED. $382.20 5/27/2010 52710 DUBIN MED. $41.07 5/24/2010 P075976 DUBIN MED. $120.00 5/21/2010 52110 DUBIN MED. $123.57 $666.84 10/4/2011 10411 GULF COAST $1,078.92 10/3/2011 10311 GULF COAST $1,078.92 9/13/2011 91311 GULF COAST $992.32 9/16/2011 91611 GULF COAST $1,029.42 9/7/2011 833 GULF COAST $835.00 8/23/2011 82211 GULF COAST $707.96 6/6/2011 6611 GULF COAST $686.40 4/20/2011 41011 GULF COAST $338.04 4/8/2011 4811 GULF COAST $120.00 1/27/2011 12711 GULF COAST $605.64 1/17/2011 11711 GULF COAST $1,348.75 8/4/2010 8410 GULF COAST $478.50 5/6/2010 5610 GULF COAST $1,067.05 4/6/2010 4610 GULF COAST $3,653.63 3/26/2010 32610 GULF COAST $598.98 3/22/2010 32210 GULF COAST $1,875.00 3/10/2010 31010 GULF COAST $1,898.37 3/3/2010 3310 GULF COAST $3,773.37 2/25/2010 22510 GULF COAST $311.44 $22,477.71 VITAL 8/8/2011 8811 HEALTH $4,741.62 VITAL 7/11/2011 71111 HEALTH $2,665.14 VITAL 8/1/2311 832 HEALTH $1,050.00 VITAL 6/23/2011 62311 HEALTH $950.88 VITAL 6/27/2011 62711 HEALTH $5,968.83 VITAL 6/28/2011 62811 HEALTH $541.92 VITAL 6/15/2011 61511 HEALTH $1,982.49 VITAL 6/6/2011 6611 HEALTH $3,746.55 VITAL 6/15/2011 61511 HEALTH $2,957.50 VITAL 5/20/2011 52011 HEALTH $44.68 VITAL 5/12/2011 51211 HEALTH $860.59 VITAL 5/11/2011 51111 HEALTH $2,185.20 VITAL 4/20/2011 42011 HEALTH $541.92 VITAL 4/6/2011 4611 HEALTH $987.74 VITAL 3/29/2011 32911 HEALTH $542.82 VITAL 3/28/2011 32811 HEALTH $804.61 VITAL 3/23/2011 32311 HEALTH $492.42 VITAL 5/27/2010 52710 HEALTH $813.68 VITAL 1/17/2011 11711 HEALTH $1,234.65 VITAL 3/8/2011 3811 HEALTH $1,291.30 VITAL 3/14/2011 31411 HEALTH $194.27 VITAL 4/19/2010 41910 HEALTH $1,310.36 VITAL 4/8/2010 4810 HEALTH $5,955.99 VITAL 3/12/2010 31210 HEALTH $1,112.77 VITAL 2/16/2010 21610 HEALTH $4,500.00 VITAL 12/18/2009 121809 HEALTH $467.00 VITAL 6/14/2010 61410 HEALTH $135.59 VITAL 12/9/2009 12909 HEALTH $1,167.00 VITAL 11/25/2009 112509 HEALTH $1,575.00 VITAL 11/18/2009 111809 HEALTH $3,869.00 VITAL 11/11/2009 111109 HEALTH $7,613.63 VITAL 11/3/2009 11309 HEALTH $2,075.00 $64,380.15 $149,323.10 $149,323.10 This is a Violation of pharmacy law. Definition of wholesale distributor as defined in 21 CFR 205.3 subd. (9) means any one engaged in wholesale distribution of prescription drugs, including, but not limited to, retail pharmacies that conduct wholesale distribution. Unlicensed Activity. RPH Frederick Anderson while he was pharmacist-in-charge of Medical Arts Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Profession Code section 4059.5 which prohibits sales of dangerous drugs outside CA without complying with regulation in the receiving state, as relates to 21 Code of Federal Regulations section 205.4 which states every wholesale distributor in a State who engages in wholesale distributions of prescription drugs in interstate commerce must be licensed by the State licensing authority. Specifically, RPH Frederick Anderson while he was pharmacist-in-charge of Medical Arts Pharmacy located at 8851 Center Dr. #110 in La Mesa, CA 91942 purchased and sold dangerous drugs to Gulf Coast'Pharmaceuticals, Inc. located at 995 N. Halstead Rd. in Ocean Spring, MS and to Vital Healthcare located at 11 E. Lathrop Ave. in Savannah, GA and in addition Medical Arts Pharmacy is in violation of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated (OCGA) 26-4-115 subd which states all persons, ?rms, or corporation, whether located in this state or in any other state engaged in the business of selling or distributing drugs at wholesale in this state shall be registered as a drug wholesaler. Medical Arts Pharmacy made these sales on the following dates and purchase order numbers: 10/4/2011 10411 GULF COAST $1,078.92 10/3/2011 10311 GULF COAST $1,078.92 9/13/2011 91311 GULF COAST $992.32 9/16/2011 91611 GULF COAST $1,029.42 9/7/2011 833 GULF COAST $835.00 8/23/2011 82211 GULF COAST $707.96 6/6/2011 6611 GULF COAST $686.40 4/20/2011 41011 GULF COAST $338.04 4/8/2011 4811 GULF COAST $120.00 1/27/2011 12711 GULF COAST $605.64 1/17/2011 11711 GULF COAST $1,348.75 8/4/2010 8410 GULF COAST $478.50 5/6/2010 5610 GULF COAST $1,067.05 4/6/2010 4610 GULF COAST $3,653.63 3/26/2010 32610 GULF COAST $598.98 3/22/2010 32210 GULF COAST $1,875.00 3/10/2010 31010 GULF COAST $1,898.37 3/3/2010 3310 GULF COAST $3,773.37 2/25/2010 22510 GULF COAST $311.44 $22,477.71 VITAL 8/8/2011 8811 HEALTH $4,741.62 VITAL 7/11/2011 71111 HEALTH $2,665.14 VITAL 8/1/2311 832 HEALTH $1,050.00 VITAL 6/23/2011 62311 HEALTH $950.88 VITAL 6/27/2011 62711 HEALTH $5,968.83 VITAL 6/28/2011 62811 HEALTH $541.92 VITAL 6/15/2011 61511 HEALTH $1,982.49 6/6/2011 6611 VITAL $3,746.55 HEALTH VITAL 6/15/2011 61511 HEALTH $2957.50 VITAL 5/20/2011 52011 HEALTH $44.68 VITAL 5/12/2011 51211 HEALTH $860.59 VITAL 5/11/2011 51111 HEALTH $2,185.20 VITAL 4/20/2011 42011 HEALTH $541.92 VITAL 4/6/2011 4611 HEALTH $987.74 VITAL 3/29/2011 32911 HEALTH $542.82 VITAL 3/28/2011 32811 HEALTH $804.61 VITAL 3/23/2011 32311 HEALTH $492.42 VITAL 5/27/2010 52710 HEALTH $813.68 VITAL 1/17/2011 11711 HEALTH $1234.65 VITAL 3/8/2011 3811 HEALTH $1291.30 VITAL 3/14/2011 31411 HEALTH $194.27 VITAL 4/19/2010 41910 HEALTH $1,310.36 VITAL 4/8/2010 4810 HEALTH $5,955.99 VITAL 3/12/2010 31210 HEALTH $1,112.77 VITAL 2/16/2010 21610 HEALTH $4,500.00 VITAL 12/18/2009 121809 HEALTH $467.00 VITAL 6/14/2010 61410 HEALTH $135.59 VITAL 12/9/2009 12909 HEALTH $1,167.00 VITAL 11/25/2009 112509 HEALTH $1,575.00 VITAL 11/18/2009 111809 HEALTH $3,869.00 VITAL 11/11/2009 111109 HEALTH $7,613.63 VITAL 11/3/2009 11309 HEALTH $2,075.00 $64,380.15 This is a violation of pharmacy law. Non Compliant Delivery of Dangerous Drugs._ RPH Fred Anders while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge of Medical Arts Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4059.5 subd which states except as othen/vise provided in this chapter, dangerous drugs or dangerous devices may only be ordered by an entity licensed by the board and shall be delivered to the licensed premises and signed for and received by a pharmacist. Where a licensee is permitted to operate through a designated representative, the designated representative shall sign for and receive the delivery. Specifically, RPH Fred Anderson while he was Pharmacist? in-Charge of Medical Arts Pharmacy located at 8851 Center Dr. #110 in La Mesa, CA 91942 purchased and sold dangerous drugs to Gulf Coast Pharmaceuticals, Inc. located at 995 N. Halstead Rd. in Ocean Spring, MS and to Vital Healthcare located at 11 E. Lathrop Ave. in Savannah, GA and allowed Mr. Charles Burruss, an unlicensed employee of these wholesalers, to pick up these sales at Medical Arts Pharmacy, in California on the following dates and purchase order numbers: 10/4/2011 10411 GULF COAST $1,078.92 10/3/2011 10311 GULF COAST $1,078.92 9/13/2011 91311 GULF COAST $992.32 9/16/2011 91611 GULF COAST $1,029.42 9/7/2011 833 GULF COAST $835.00 8/23/2011 82211 GULF COAST $707.96 6/6/2011 6611 GULF COAST $686.40 4/20/2011 41011 GULF COAST $338.04 4/8/2011 4811 GULF COAST $120.00 1/27/2011 12711 GULF COAST $605.64 1/17/2011 11711 GULF COAST $1,348.75 8/4/2010 8410 GULF COAST $478.50 5/6/2010 5610 GULF COAST $1,067.05 4/6/2010 4610 GULF COAST $3,653.63 3/26/2010 32610 GULF COAST $598.98 3/22/2010 32210 GULF COAST $1,875.00 3/10/2010 31010 GULF COAST $1,898.37 3/3/2010 3310 GULF COAST $3,773.37 2/25/2010 22510 GULF COAST $311.44 $22,477.71 VITAL 8/8/201 1 881 1 HEALTH $4,741 .62 7/11/2011 71111 HEALTH $2,665.14 This violation of pharmacy law. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: - Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Fredrick Anderson shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Fredrick Anderson timely seeks pre?approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation for violation of Business and Professions Code section 4126.5 subd. shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Fredrick Anderson timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation for violation of Business and Professions Code section 4126.5 subd. shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. lf RPH Fredrick Anderson fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Fredrick Anderson within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED 0N: Februarv 23. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF 310.000.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: March 24. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE ORDER OF ABATEMENT Name, License NO. PETER FRANZ DOLEZAL, RPH 33437 Citation Number Cl 2011 51652 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $2,500.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage Bus. Prof. Code 4059.5 Who may order dangerous drugs or $500.00 devices CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler. RPH Peter Dolezal while he was Pharmacist-in- Charge at Garfield Prescription Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subd. which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Peter Dolezal while he was Pharmacist?Charge of Gar?eld Prescription Pharmacy located at 9400 Brighton Way in Beverly Hills, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Garfield Prescription Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Gar?eld Prescription Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate speci?c shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 8/1/2011 1 PRIORITY $135.20 8/5/2011 2 PRIORITY $3,242.01 8/11/2011 3 PRIORITY $118.06 8/12/2011 4 PRIORITY $22.94 8/25/2011 5 PRIORITY $319.97 $90.18 9/7/2011 6 PRIORITY PRIORITY TOTAL This is a violation of pharmacy law $96.96 $4025.32 10/3/2011 7 Non-Compliant Delivery of Dangerous Drugs. RPH Peter Dolezal while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge of Garfield Prescription Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4059.5 subd which states except as othenrvise provided in this chapter, dangerous drugs or dangerous devices may only be ordered by an entity licensed by the board and shall be delivered to the licensed premises and signed for and received by a pharmacist. Where a licensee is permitted to operate through a designated representative, the designated representative shall sign for and receive the delivery. Specifically, RPH Peter Dolezal while he was Pharmacist-in-charge of Garfield Prescription Pharmacy located at 9400 Brighton Way in Beverly Hills, CA sold Dangerous Drugs to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Blvd. in San Diego, CA 92121 on invoice 2, dated 8/5/2011. But the shipping label provided by Priority Pharmaceutical indicated it was shipped to David Reliance located at 9325 Rancho Park Road in Cordova, TN. The shipping label also indicated it was shipped from Vital Healthcare located at 11 E. Lathrop Ave. in Savannah, GA not Gar?eld Prescription Pharmacy. This is a violation of pharmacy law. ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Peter Franz Dolezal shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. If RPH Peter Franz Dolezal timely seeks pre?approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Peter Franz Dolezal timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the ?ne(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Peter Franz Dolezal fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Peter Franz Dolezal within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED ON: March 12. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $3300.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: April 11. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE Citation Number Name, License No. Cl 2011 51653 LORD VON SARINO, RPH 57332 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. (0) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5000.00 subd. Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler- RPH Lord Sarino while he was Pharmacist-in- Chage of Garden Grove Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Lord Sarino while he was Pharmacist-in-Chage of Garden Grove Pharmacy located at 12665 Garden Grove Ste 108 in Garden Grove, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Garden Grove Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority, in addition Garden Grove Pharmacy gave their AmeriSource Bergen account number to Priority and authorization to order drugs without Garden Grove Pharmacy knowing what was being ordered. Garden Grove Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: Garden Grov 05/17/2011 918334 $110.00 Leucovorin Garden Grov 05/17/2011 918335 $24.75 Papaverine 10ml Garden Grov 05/17/2011 918336 $68.75 Papaverine 10ml Garden Grov 05/17/2011 918337 $47.30 ralazine Garden Grov 05/17/2011 918338 $186.89 Phenylephrine Garden Grov 05/23/201 1 918964 $49.45 Hydralazine Garden 05/25/2011 919298 $19.55 cyanobalamine Grov Garden Grov 05/25/2011 919299 $17.25 Potassium phos Garden Grov 06/01/2011 919869 $20.31 Garden Grov 06/01/2011 919870 $49.45 Hydralazine Garden Grov 05/26/2011 919473 $37.94 Epinephrine Garden Magnesium Grov 05/27/2011 919585 $29.05 Sulfate Garden Grov 06/06/201 1 930327 $71.99 Vasopressin Garden Grov 06/06/201 1 920328 $28.75 Pitressin Garden Grov 06/06/2011 920326 $58.17 Hydralazine Garden Magnesium Grov 06/06/2011 920329 $27.31 Sulfate Garden Grov 06/07/201 1 920438 $192.63 Protamine Garden Grov 06/07/201 1 920437 $215.63 Vasopressin Garden Grov 06/07/2011 920435 $51.75 Potassium phos Garden Grov 06/08/201 1 920563 $1 .64266 Dexamethasone Garden Grov 06/08/2011 920564 $1 ,172.31 Phenylephrine Garden Grov 06/ 13/201 1 920996 $57.39 L-Cysteine Garden Grov 06/13/2011 920997 $76.94 Hydralazine Garden Grov 06/14/2011 921121 $67.56 Sod Acetate Garden Magnesium Grov 06/14/2011 921120 $27.31 Sulfate Garden Grov 06/14/2011 921118 $40.25 Calcium Chloride Garden Grov 06/15/2011 921236 $1 ,196.00 Amikacin Garden Grov 06/21/2011 921810 $235.75 Zinc Chloride Garden Magnesium Grov 06/21/2011 921808 $27.31 Sulfate Garden Grov 06/29/2011 922593 $76.94 Hydralazine Garden Grov 07/06/201 1 923099 $49.45 Hydralazine Garden Grov 07/06/2011 923098 $169.05 Hydralazine $6,145.84 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Lord Sarino shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. lf RPH Lord Sarino timely seeks pre-approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Lord Sarino timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. lf RPH Lord Sarino fails to timely seek pre-approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Lord Sarino within thirty (30) days of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED 0N: March 13. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $5000.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: April 12. 2012 BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITATION AND FINE ORDER OF ABATEMENT Citation Number Cl 2011 51654 Name, License No. HONG THANH TRAN, RPH 52824 JURISDICTION: Bus. Prof. Code 4005; CCR, title 16, 1775; Bus. Prof. Code 4113 subd. (6) VIOLATION CODE SECTION OFFENSE AMOUNT OF FINE Bus. Prof. Code 4126.5 Furnishing Dangerous Drugs by $5,000.00 Pharmacy; pharmacy or alleviate temporary shortage subd. Bus. Prof. Code 4059.5 Dangerous drugs and devices may only Citation without a be ordered and shall be delivered fine to licensed premises and signed for and received by a subd. CONDUCT: Non-compliant Sales to a wholesaler? RPH Hong Tran while he was Pharmacist-in- Charge at Rancho Park Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4126.5, subdivision which states a pharmacy may furnish dangerous drugs only to the following: Another pharmacy or wholesaler to alleviate a temporary shortage of a dangerous drug that could result in the denial of health care and only in quantities sufficient to alleviate the shortage. Speci?cally, RPH Hong Tran while he was Pharmacist-Charge of Rancho Park Pharmacy located at 1331 Encinitas in Encinitas, CA did not have the dangerous drugs in stock, ordered them from Amerisource Bergen, a wholesaler, and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Rancho Park Pharmacy did not have independent knowledge of the temporary shortage and allowed Priority Pharmaceuticals to specify the drugs in short supply they wanted the pharmacy to purchase for them. The pharmacy was acting as a purchasing agent for Priority. Rancho Park Pharmacy depended on Priority to identify the shortages, know what quantity of dangerous drugs was needed to alleviate specific shortages, if a temporary shortage actually existed, or if lack of the drug would result in a denial of health care, thus increasing the shortage on the following dates and invoice numbers: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 4/20/2011 1 PRIORITY $530.16 4/22/2011 2 PRIORITY $2,114.95 514/201 1 3 PRIORITY $1,346.90 5/4/2011 4 PRIORITY $538.80 5/4/2011 5 PRIORITY $116.20 5/11/2011 6 PRIORITY $387.30 5/26/2011 7 PRIORITY $36.30 5/26/2011 8 PRIORITY $376.10 6/1/2011 9 PRIORITY $27.80 6/9/2011 10 PRIORITY $374.00 6/30/2011 11 PRIORITY $248.35 7/11/2011 12 PRIORITY $193.89 7/11/2011 13 PRIORITY $157.25 7/14/2011 14 PRIORITY $1,166.55 7/19/2011 15 PRIORITY $617.78 7/21/2011 16 PRIORITY $269.10 7/25/2011 17 PRIORITY $429.46 7/25/2011 18 PRIORITY $206.79 8/4/2011 19 PRIORITY $819.62 8/24/2011 20 PRIORITY $94.32 9/20/2011 21 PRIORITY $225.35 $10,276.97 This is a violation of pharmacy law Non-Compliant Delivery of Dangerous Drugs? RPH Hong Tran while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge of Ranch Park Pharmacy was not in compliance with Business and Professions Code section 4059.5 subdivision which states except as otherwise provided in this chapter, dangerous drugs or dangerous devices may only be ordered by an entity licensed by the board and shall be delivered to the licensed premises and signed for and received by a pharmacist. Where a licensee is permitted to operate through a designated representative, the designated representative shall sign for and receive the delivery. Specifically, RPH Hong Tran while he was Pharmacist-in-Charge of Rancho Park Pharmacy located at 1331 Encinitas in Encinitas, CA ordered dangerous drugs and resold them to Priority Pharmaceutical located at 4040 Sorrento Valley Ste D, San Diego, CA 92121. Rancho Park did not deliver the drugs to the licensed premises of Priority Pharmaceutical and have the orders signed for and received by a designated representative on the following invoices and dates: INVOICE DATE NO WHOLESALERS AMOUNT 4/20/2011 1 PRIORITY $530.16 4/22/2011 2 PRIORITY $2,114.95 5/4/2011 3 PRIORITY $1,346.90 5/4/2011 4 PRIORITY $538.80 5/4/2011 5 PRIORITY $116.20 5/11/2011 6 PRIORITY $387.30 5/26/2011 7 PRIORITY $36.30 5/26/2011 8 PRIORITY $376.10 6/1/2011 9 PRIORITY $27.80 6/9/2011 10 PRIORITY $374.00 6/30/2011 11 PRIORITY $248.35 7/11/2011 12 PRIORITY $193.89 7/11/2011 13 PRIORITY $157.25 7/14/2011 14 PRIORITY $1,166.55 7/19/2011 15 PRIORITY $617.78 7/21/2011 16 PRIORITY $269.10 7/25/2011 17 PRIORITY $429.46 7/25/2011 18 PRIORITY $206.79 8/4/2011 19 PRIORITY $819.62 8/24/2011 20 PRIORITY $94.32 9/20/2011 21 PRIORITY $225.35 $10,276.97 This is a violation of pharmacy law ORDER OF ABATEMENT By the abatement date submit to the Board the following: Proof of enrollment in an ethics course, approved in advance by the Board or its designee, meeting the requirements of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 1773.5. RPH Hong Tran shall thereafter initiate and successfully participate the ethics course within eighteen (18) months of the abatement date, and shall successfully complete the approved ethics course, including the longitudinal follow-up contacts, within two (2) years of the abatement date. Any failure to do so shall be deemed a failure to meet the abatement requirements of this citation. lf RPH Hong Tran timely seeks pre?approval of the ethics course, timely enrolls in an approved ethics course, and timely submits proof of that enrollment, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be stayed pending completion of the approved ethics course. If RPH Hong Tran timely enrolls, initiates, and successfully completes the ethics course, the fine(s) levied by this citation shall be reduced to zero and completion of the ethics course shall be considered satisfactory abatement of the citation. If RPH Hong Tran fails to timely seek pre?approval, enroll, initiate, or successfully complete the ethics course, the stay shall be lifted and the ?ne(s) shall be due and owing from RPH Hong Tran within thirty (30) dag of any such failure. CITATION ISSUED ON: March 13. 2012 TOTAL AMOUNT OF $5300.00 PAYMENT OF DUE BY: April 12. 2012