Case 3:15-cv-01587-AA

Document 1

Filed 08/20/15

Page 1 of 11

Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049
email: carl@crowell-law.com
Drew P. Taylor, OSB 135974
email: drew@crowell-law.com
CROWELL LAW
P.O. Box 923
Salem, OR 97308
(503) 581-1240
Of attorneys for plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
Case No.: 3:15-cv-01587
SURVIVOR PRODUCTIONS, INC.,
Plaintiff,

COMPLAINT

v.

COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

ANONYMOUS USERS OF POPCORN
TIME: DOES 1 - 16,
Defendants.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Survivor Productions, Inc. (“plaintiff / Survivor”), complains and alleges as
follows:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1.

This is a suit for copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq. (“The Copyright

Act”).
2.

This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).

3.

Venue in this district is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1400(a)

as the defendants are believed to reside in this district.
COMPLAINT

Page 1 of 11

 Case 3:15-cv-01587-AA

Document 1

Filed 08/20/15

Page 2 of 11

PARTIES
PLAINTIFF
4.

Plaintiff Survivor Productions, Inc., is a Nevada Corporation and a motion picture

production company with offices in Los Angeles, California.
5.

Plaintiff Survivor Productions, Inc. is an affiliate of the Nu Image / Millennium Films,

production companies, distributors of a notable catalog of major motion pictures.
The Rights of Survivor
6.

The motion picture titled Survivor is a notable motion picture released in 2015.

7.

Survivor Productions, Inc., is the copyright holder of the completed the motion picture

Survivor, registration submitted to the United States Copyright Office prior to the complained of
infringement, receipt of certificate pending.
8.

Survivor Productions, Inc., is the registered copyright holder of the screenplay and print

material for the dramatic work Survivor, registered with the United States Copyright Office,

Reg. No. PAu 3-749-574, 2014.
9.

Under The Copyright Act, plaintiff is the proprietor of copyrights and interests necessary

to being suit.
10.

The motion picture contains original material that is copyrightable subject matter under

the laws of the United States protected by both the existing and pending registrations.
11.

The motion picture is currently offered for sale in commerce.

12.

Defendants had notice of plaintiff’s rights through general publication and advertising

and more specifically as identified in the content of the motion picture, advertising associated
with the motion picture, and all packaging and copies, each of which bore a proper copyright
notice.

COMPLAINT

Page 2 of 11

 Case 3:15-cv-01587-AA

13.

Document 1

Filed 08/20/15

Page 3 of 11

The motion picture Survivor is being wrongfully distributed on the Internet through the

BitTorrent network and is now being widely pirated limiting its ability to gain access to and
benefit from conventional market outlets.
14.

Plaintiff comes to court seeking relief as the motion picture Survivor has been

downloaded through BitTorrent hundreds of thousands of times with over 10,000 instances of
piracy traced to locations in the State of Oregon.
15.

Faced with extensive piracy, Survivor is forced to defend its rights though this action.
THE DEFENDANTS

16.

The defendants are identified herein as Does 1 – 16, and more specifically identified in

EXHIBIT 1.
17.

Each defendant has been confirmed to be using the Popcorn Time file sharing software

that is specifically designed for and intended for committing theft, including theft of plaintiff’s
motion picture.
18.

Each defendant has been established as a user of the Popcorn Time who willfully

infringed plaintiff’s rights.
19.

The defendants in this action are specifically listed in EXHIBIT 1, which identifies each

defendant’s IP address and a specific time of observed infringing activity, and estimated geolocated place of the defendant’s conduct and the specific version of Popcorn Time used.
20.

Each defendant’s IP address has been observed and confirmed as both viewing and

distributing plaintiff’s motion picture through Popcorn Time.
21.

Each defendant’s IP address has been observed as associated with the peer-to-peer

exchange of other copyrighted titles through the BitTorrent network.
22.

At that time of observed infringement each defendant’s IP address was managed by

Internet Service Provider (“ISP”) Comcast, who on information and belief, generally assigns an
COMPLAINT

Page 3 of 11

 Case 3:15-cv-01587-AA

Document 1

Filed 08/20/15

Page 4 of 11

IP address to a single party for extended periods of time, often for months and provides Wi-Fi
systems with notable pre-installed security and passwords.
23.

The records maintained by Comcast should be able to identify either each defendant, or

the subscriber who contracted with Comcast for service who in turn is likely to have knowledge
that will lead to the identity of each defendant.
24.

Plaintiff intends to seek initial discovery to subpoena records from Comcast to ascertain

the true identity of each defendant.
BACKGROUND
PEER-TO-PEER INTERNET PIRACY
25.

As stated by Congressman Lamar Smith, "Illegal counterfeiting and piracy costs the U.S.

economy $100 billion and thousands of jobs every year.”
26.

As noted by Senator Levin in Congressional hearings on peer-to-peer Internet piracy, “In

the world of copyright law, taking someone’s intellectual property is a serious offense,
punishable by large fines. In the real world, violations of copyright law over the Internet are so
widespread and easy to accomplish that many participants seem to consider it equivalent to
jaywalking – illegal but no big deal. But it is a big deal. Under U.S. law, stealing intellectual
property is just that – stealing. It hurts artists, the music industry, the movie industry, and others
involved in creative work. And it is unfortunate that the software being used – called ‘file
sharing’ as if it were simply enabling friends to share recipes, is helping create a generation of
Americans who don’t see the harm.”
27.

In 2013, in recognition of the growing problems and challenges with counterfeiting and

piracy, The Oregon House of Representatives passed House Memorial 2, which made the
following findings:

COMPLAINT

Page 4 of 11

 Case 3:15-cv-01587-AA

Document 1

Filed 08/20/15

Page 5 of 11

Whereas the United States and other nations share the challenge of combating
intellectual piracy and the counterfeiting of intellectual property such as … films… and
technologies that affect the quality of life; and
Whereas intellectual piracy and counterfeiting have a significant impact on Oregon's
economy, and the economies of other states and of nations around the world, which
results in job and earnings losses, reduced tax revenues and increased threats to public
health and safety; and
…
Whereas protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights is crucial to the future
of our innovation-based economy; and
Whereas industries that use intellectual property extensively generate nearly $7.7
trillion in gross output and account for more than 60 percent of total exports from our
nation; and
Whereas industries that use intellectual property extensively … employ more than 19
million Americans, whose salaries average about 60 percent higher than salaries in
industries that do not make extensive use of intellectual property; and
Whereas intellectual property infringement can undermine the nation's economic
security; and
Whereas violations of intellectual property rights, ambiguities in the law and a lack
of enforcement create uncertainty in the marketplace and in the legal system and
undermine consumer trust; and
Whereas intellectual property, including trademarks, [are] essential …; and
…
Whereas failing to adequately protect and enforce intellectual property rights will
increase counterfeiting and illicit trade;
…
28.

As such it is clear that giving effect to 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq., and the enforcement of

intellectual property rights, and in particular the fight against counterfeiting and piracy are
critical issues of importance to the both the United States of America and the State of Oregon.
POPCORN TIME
29.

Unlike other software programs that facilitate piracy which have arguably legitimate

purposes (many parties point to the mere potential to exchange public domain content), the
software at issue in this case is Popcorn Time.
30.

Popcorn Time exists for one purpose and one purpose only: to steal copyrighted

content. See generally: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popcorn_Time

COMPLAINT

Page 5 of 11

 Case 3:15-cv-01587-AA

31.

Document 1

Filed 08/20/15

Page 6 of 11

In the accessing of the Popcorn Time web page, parties are alerted to this fact with the

clear notation: Downloading copyrighted material may be illegal in your country. EXHIBIT 2.
32.

The web page for the Popcorn Time ‘Frequently Asked Questions,’ or the FAQ page

elaborates with the response to the question:
Is this legal?
Depends on where you're from, really. Once again: we're using torrents, so if you really
care, you'd better google what the legal situation around this protocol is where you live.
EXHIBIT 3.
33.

The web page FAQ clearly notifies users they will be publishing movies and “seeding”

the movies they watch with the statement:
“You're going to be uploading bits and bits of the movie for as long as you're watching it
on Popcorn Time.”
34.

When the Popcorn Time software is installed, users are required to accept Terms of

Service and acknowledge,
“ALL MOVIES . . . ARE STREAMED USING THE P2P BIT TORRENT PROTOCOL.
. . . BY WATCHING A MOVIE WITH THIS APPLICATION YOU MIGHT BE
COMMITTING COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS...”
EXHIBIT 3, Caps in original.
35.

Without a doubt, each user of Popcorn Time is provided multiple notices that they are

downloading and installing software for the express purpose of committing theft and contributing
to the ability of others to commit theft by furthering the BitTorrent piracy network.
36.

Once installed, a user is then able to view available pirated movies to download and

view, many still in theatres. Exemplar View presented as Exhibit 4.

COMPLAINT

Page 6 of 11

 Case 3:15-cv-01587-AA

37.

Document 1

Filed 08/20/15

Page 7 of 11

Plaintiff’s motion picture Survivor is currently promoted by Popcorn Time as on the top

row in the ‘thriller’ category of motion pictures. Exhibit 4, accessed August 7, 2015.
38.

Once a party clicks on a motion picture, such as plaintiff’s they are then brought to a

launch screen, which provides options, including the ability to select subtitles, or resolution (720
v. 1080). Exhibit 5.
39.

Once a party actually views the motion picture, they are presented with copyright notices

and warnings, which based on the regular activity associated with each defendant’s IP address
have been repeatedly disregarded.
40.

Without a doubt, the download, installation, and use of Popcorn Time is for the sole and

willful express purpose of committing theft.
41.

Each user of Popcorn Time joins in this conduct with the informed express intent of both

furthering their own acts of theft, and facilitating the theft by others as each Popcorn Time user is
provided a notice, often multiple times, that they are accessing copyrighted material and acting
as a “seeder” for others. See generally Exhibits 2 – 4.
42.

Each user of Popcorn Time expressly joins in a conspiracy to jointly commit theft of

copyrighted material, including the content of plaintiff and to facilitate the theft of content by
others.
43.

Popcorn Time cannot be considered to have any reasonable legal or legitimate use.

44.

The mere possession of a software program like Popcorn Time is the type of conduct that

the State of Oregon has criminalized in ORS 164.235, which reads in part:
164.235 Possession of a burglary tool or theft device. (1) A person commits the crime of
possession of a burglary tool or theft device if the person possesses a burglary tool or
theft device and the person:

COMPLAINT

Page 7 of 11

 Case 3:15-cv-01587-AA

Document 1

Filed 08/20/15

Page 8 of 11

(a) Intends to use the tool or device to commit or facilitate … a theft by a physical
taking; or
(b) Knows that another person intends to use the tool or device to commit or facilitate
a … theft by a physical taking.
(2) For purposes of this section, “burglary tool or theft device” means … [any]
instrument or other article adapted or designed for committing or facilitating a … theft by
a physical taking.
(3) Possession of a burglary tool or theft device is a Class A misdemeanor.
45.

It is acknowledged that the transfer of data, storing of the physical data locally on a hard

drive and facilitation and redistribution of the stolen data to others may or may not be a “physical
taking” under Oregon law.
46.

Whether or not the mere possession and use of Popcorn Time is a Class A misdemeanor

under Oregon Law and punishable by up to one year in jail (ORS 161.615(1)) and a fine of
$6,250.00 (ORS 161.635(1)(a)) may be argued. But there is no doubt that use of Popcorn Time
constitutes serious willful copyright infringement.
JOINDER
47.

Plaintiff acknowledges that joinder in this action under FRCP 20(a)(2) is permissive in

that plaintiff’s claims arise out of the same occurrences or transactions, or series of occurrences
or transactions and that there are questions of law and fact common to each of the defendants.
48.

All the defendants have collectively acted through the willful and intentional use of

Popcorn Time with the express purpose of committing intellectual property theft, damaging
plaintiff.

COMPLAINT

Page 8 of 11

 Case 3:15-cv-01587-AA

49.

Document 1

Filed 08/20/15

Page 9 of 11

All of the defendants have collectively acted with notice that their individual and

collective conduct facilitated intellectual property theft being committed by others.
50.

Each of the defendants willfully joined in the collective conspiracy of using Popcorn

Time for an illegal purpose and willfully acted to cause harm to plaintiff and to assist others,
including each other defendant, in causing harm to plaintiff through their use of and support of
Popcorn Time and the BitTorrent distribution of motion pictures.
51.

The plaintiff’s rights to relief, as stated below, ultimately arise out of the same series of

inter-related transactions and occurrences.
52.

This action also raises substantial questions of law and fact common to all defendants.

53.

Permissive joinder in the instant case is to permit a more efficient management of the

claims of plaintiff against the several defendants and to reduce the costs to plaintiff and
defendants and to reduce the costs and burdens on the Court.
54.

Notice is provided, that on being specifically identified and on request from an identified

defendant, plaintiff agrees to sever any defendant that claims prejudice in being joined in this
matter and proceed against each such defendant individually.
55.

Plaintiff intends to provide updates to the court on the status of this action and the status

of each defendant on a regular basis.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
56.

Defendants and each of them, without the permission or consent of plaintiff, copied and

distributed plaintiff’s motion picture through the BitTorrent network using the Popcorn Time
software without authorization or right.

COMPLAINT

Page 9 of 11

 Case 3:15-cv-01587-AA

57.

Document 1

Filed 08/20/15

Page 10 of 11

Each defendant’s conduct included willful acts intended to infringe plaintiff’s exclusive

rights under The Copyright Act and furthered the publication and distribution of copies of
plaintiff’s motion picture to others.
58.

Each defendant’s conduct has been willful, intentional, in disregard of and indifferent to

plaintiff’s rights with notice and the intent to deprive plaintiff of income and cause plaintiff
harm.
59.

As a direct and proximate result of each defendant’s conduct, plaintiff’s exclusive rights

under 17 U.S.C. § 106 have been violated.
60.

Plaintiff is entitled to damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504 and attorney fees and costs

pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505 from each defendant.
61.

The conduct of each defendant is causing and, unless enjoined and restrained by this

Court, will continue to cause plaintiff great and irreparable injury.
62.

Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §§ 502 and 503, plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief prohibiting

each defendant from further contributing to the infringement of plaintiff’s copyrights and
ordering that each defendant destroy all copies of the motion picture made in violation of
plaintiff’s rights and refrain from using Popcorn Time or any peer-to-peer software to download
or distribute content without a license.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays for judgment against each defendant as follows:
A.

For entry of permanent injunction enjoining each defendant from directly, indirectly
or contributorily infringing plaintiff’s rights, including without limitation using the
internet to reproduce or copy plaintiff’s motion picture, to distribute plaintiff’s
motion picture, or to make plaintiff’s motion picture available for distribution to the
public, except pursuant to a lawful license or with the express authority of plaintiff;

COMPLAINT

Page 10 of 11

 Case 3:15-cv-01587-AA

B.

Document 1

Filed 08/20/15

Page 11 of 11

For entry of permanent injunction enjoining each defendant from using Popcorn
Time or any peer-to-peer software to download or distribute content without a
license;

C.

Statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504;

D.

For plaintiff’s reasonable costs and attorney fees pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505; and

E.

For such other and further relief as the Court deems proper.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff demands a trial by
jury.
DATED: August 20, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
CROWELL LAW
/s/ Carl D. Crowell
Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049
carl@crowell-law.com
Drew P. Taylor, OSB No. 135974
drew@crowell-law.com
503-581-1240
Of attorneys for the plaintiff

COMPLAINT

Page 11 of 11