:22 Home Apply for Grants Confirmation Confirmation Thank you for submitting your grant application package via Grantsgov. Your application is currently being processed by the Grantsgov system. Once your submission has been processed, Grantsgov will send email messages to advise you of the progress of your application through the system. Over the next 24 to 48 hours, you should receive two emails. The first will confirm receipt of your application by the Grantsgov system, and the second will indicate that the application has either been successfully validated by the system prior to transmission to the grantor agency or has been rejected due to errors. Please do not hit the back button on your browser. If your application is successfully validated and subsequently retrieved by the grantor agency from the Grantsgov system, you will receive an additional email. This email may be delivered several days or weeks from the date of submission, depending on when the grantor agency retrieves it. You may also monitor the processing status of your submission within the Grantsgov system by clicking on the ?Track My Application? link listed at the end of this form. Note: Once the grantor agency has retrieved your application from Grantsgov, you will need to contact them directly for any subsequent status updates. Grantsgov does not participate in making any award decisions. IMPORTANT NOTICE: If you do not receive a receipt con?rmation and either a validation confirmation or a rejection email message within 48 hours, please contact us. The Grantsgov Contact Center can be reached by email at support@grants.qov, or by telephone at 1-800-518-4726. Always include your Grantsgov tracking number in all correspondence. The tracking numbers issued by Grants.gov look like If you have questions please contact the Grantsgov Contact Center: support@grants.gov 1-800-518-4726 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Closed on federal holidays. The following application tracking information was generated by the system: Grants.gov Tracking Number: Applicant DUNS: Submitter's Name: CFDA Number: CF DA Description: Funding Opportunity Number: Funding Opportunity Description: Agency Name: Application Name of this Submission: Date/Time of Receipt: 06-354?1874 Eva Lee 16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program BJA FY 15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Bureau of Justice Assistance City of San Jose Jun 30, 2015 06:27:27 PM EDT TRACK MY APPLICATION To check the status of this application, please click the link below: tracking It is suggested you Save and/or Print this response for your records. Processing, please don't close the window until you receive a confirmation. e" b_di . . Grant Application Package Opponunny BJA FY 15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety Offering Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance i CFDA Number: 16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program Opportunity Number! BJA-2015-4196 Competition ID: Opportunity Open Date: 05/14/2015 Opportunity Close Date: 07/02/2015 Agency coma?: For assistance with any other requirements of this solicitation, contact the National Criminal Justice Reference Service Response Center: toll?free at 1?800?851?3420; via TTY at 301~240-6310 (hearing impaired only); email fax to n-r- mash th+ :at' ran?'11?: This opportunity is only open to organizations, applicants who are submitting grant applications on behalf of a company, state, local or tribal government, academia, or other type of organization. Application Filing Name: City of San Jose Mandatory Application for Federal Assistance Complete Complete Budclet Narrative Attachment-germ - I Complete Disclosure of Lobbvina Complete Other Attachments Forth - ""Complete Proiect Narrative Attachment Form I Complete?- Faith Based EEO Survev OMB Number: 4040?0004 Exp?ration Date: 8/31/2016 Application for Federal Assistance 1. Type of Submission: 2. Type oprpIication: If Revision. select appropriate ietter(s): Preapplication New Application I: Continuation Other (Specify): Changed/Corrected Application I: Revision 3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identi?er: 06/30/2015 I I 5a. Federal Entity Identi?er: 5b. Federal Award Identifier: State Use Only: 6. Date Received by State: 7. State Application Identifier: I 8. APPLICANT INFORMATION: Legal Name: ICity of San Jose b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number c. Organizational DUNS: 94?6000419 I I06354l8740000 d. Address: *Streel?ll I200 E. Santa Clara Street Street2: I17th Floor ISan Jose I County/Parish: I I State: I CA: California Province: I I *Country: I USA: UNITED STATES *ZiplPostaICode: I e. Organizational Unit: Department Name: Division Name: San Jose Police Department I I f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application: Middle Name: I I Last Name: IOtani Title: ISenior Grant Analyst Organizational Affiliation: Telephone Number: 40 3-537-1518 Fax Number: Email: Ijennifer . otani@sanjoseca . gov Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type: C: City or Township Government Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type: Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type: I Other (specify): *10. Name of Federai Agency: lBureau of Justice Assistance 11. Cataiog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: ll6.738 CFDA Title: Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program 12. Funding Opportunity Number: Title: BJA FY 15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) 13. Competition identification Number: Title: 14. Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.): 15. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project: San Jose Police Department Facial Recognition Program Attach supporting documents as speci?ed in agency instructions. 2 {Add AttaChme'nts 2-: .iDeieteAsaschmems If yew-Attachments; Appiication for Federal Assistance SF-424 16. Congressional Districts 0f: a. Applicant b. Program/Project Attach an additional list of Program/Project Congressional Districts if needed. I Lgeddietaea?mitii 17. Proposed Project: a. Start Date: 10/01/2015 b. End Date: 03/31/2017 18. Estimated Funding Federal I b. Applicant I 0 .00I State I 0.00I Local I 0 .OOI Other I 0.00I Program Income I 0 . 00I TOTAL I 19. is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process? a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on b. Program is subject to EU. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review. c. Program is not covered by ED. 12372. 20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes," provide explanation in attachment.) I: Yes No If "Yes", provide explanation and attach I Attachr?ent? 2 a! page: Attachin??ai' I: i EVie'WILAtt'aehment" 21. *By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications? and (2) that the statements herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knoWledge. I also provide the required assurances? and agree to comply with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U.S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001) IAGREE The list of certi?cations and assurances, or an internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or agency specific instructions. Authorized Representative: Prefix: I I First Name: IJulie I Middle Name: I I *LastName: IEdmonds?Mares I Suffix: I I *Tme: IDeputy City Manager I Telephone Number: I(4oa) 53 5?8155 I Fax Number: Ema": Ijulie . edmonds?mares@sanjoseca . g?ov Signature of Authorized Representative: Eva Lee Date Signed: Ice/3012015 OMB Number: 4040-0007 Expiration Date: 06/30/2014 ASSURANCES - NON-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Papenrvork Reduction Project (0348?0040), Washington, DC 20503. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. SEND IT TO THE ADDRESS PROVIDED BY THE SPONSORING AGENCY. NOTE: As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I certify that the applicant: 1. Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your project or program. Ifyou have questions, please contact the awarding agency. Further, certain Federal awarding agencies may require applicants to certify to additional assurances. if such is the case, you will be noti?ed. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance and the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of project cost) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States and, if appropriate, the State, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the award; and will establish a proper accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards or agency directives. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. ??4728?4763) relating to prescribed standards for merit systems for programs funded under one of the 19 statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System of Personnel Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F). Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (PL. 88?352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 1683, and 16854686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Previous Edition Usable Authorized for Local Reproduction Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. ?794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U. 3.0. which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (PL. 92-255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (PL. 91?616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; ??523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. ??290 dd?3 and 290 ee? 3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records; Title of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. ??3601 et seq), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or ?nancing of housing; any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made; and, the requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements ofTitles II and of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (PL. 91-646) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of Federal or federally?assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in purchases. . Will comply, as applicable, with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. ??1501~1508 and 7324?7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds. Standard Form 4248 (Rev. 7-97) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 9. Wt? oompiyr as applicable With the ot the 13. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance Bacon Act (40 U-S.C- ??276a to 276a-7). the Copeland Act with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation (40 U-S-C- ?276c and 18 USC. $3874), and the Contract Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. ?470), EO 11593 Work Hours and Safety Standards Aot (?40 U-S-C- ??327- (identi?cation and protection of historic properties), and 333% regarding labor Standards for tedetaiiY~aSSiSted the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of construction subagreements. 1974 (15 (130 ??469a-1 et seq) 10. Will comply, if applicable, with ?ood insurance purchase 14. Will compiv with BL. 93-9348 regarding the protection of requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster human sublects Involved in research, development. and protection Actof1g73 93-234) which requires related activities supported by this award of assistance. program and to purchase ?ood insurance if the total cost of 15' comply With the Laboratory Animal Welfare Aot 0f insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more. 1966 (PL 596441 as amendedr ??2131 et seq.) pertaining to the care, handling, and treatment of 11, Will comply with environmental standards which may be warm blooded animals held for research, teaching, or prescribed pursuant to the following: institution of other aotiVitteS supported by this award 0t aSSiStanCe- environmental quality control measures under the National I I I I I Environmental Poiicy Act of 1969 914 90) and 16. Wt? comply With the Lead?Based Paint Executive Order (EO) 11514; noti?cation of violating Prevention Act (42 ??4801Iet aeq-l Which facilities pursuant to E0 11738; protection of wetlands pmh'bI'tS the use OfIlead?based pa'm 'n Construct'on or pursuant to E0 11990; evaluation of flood hazards in rehabilitation Of res'dence Structures- ?ogdplains accordance With E0 11988; assurance of 17. Will cause to be performed the required ?nancial and proteot COnS'StenCy With the approved State management compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circuiar No. A433 Act of 1972_(16 USC. ??1451 etseo); conformity 0? "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non?Pro?t Federal actions to State (Clean Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(0) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U-S-C- ??7401 et sad); (9) Protection Of 18, Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other underground water under the Safe Federal laws, executive orders, regulations, and policies Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended (P.L. 93623); governing this program and, protection of endangered species under the Endangered Speoies Act 0t 1973: as amended (P-L- 93- 19. Will comply with the requirements of Section 106(g) of 205)- the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) of 2000, as I I I I amended (22 U.S.C. 7104) which prohibits grant award 12- Wt? comply mm the Wild and scen'o Rivers recipients or a sub-recipient from (1) Engaging in severe 1958 (16 U-S-C- ??1271 et seq-) related to PmteCt'?9 forms of traf?cking in persons during the period of time components or potential components 0f the national that the award is in effect (2) Procuring a commercial Mid and scenic ?Vets SYStem- sex act during the period of time that the award is in effect or (3) Using forced labor in the performance of the award or subawards under the award. THLE iEva Lee iDeputy City Manager I APPLICANT ORGANIZATION DATE SUBMITTED [City of San Jose loo/30/2015 I Standard Form 4243 (Rev. 7-97) Back Budget Narrative File(s) Mandatory Budget Narrative Filename: tBudget Detail and Narrative.pdf I IDe'Iete-Ma'ridatbry To add more Budget Narrative attachments. please use the attachment buttons below. 'Add .op'tib'rtalgsudget narratives: :4 jgbeuete Narrativeigj DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES Approved by OMB Complete this form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 {1.8.0.1352 0348_0046 1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type: a. contract a. bid/offerlapplicati?n a, initial ?ling b- gram b. initial award b, material change c. cooperative agreement c. post_award loan I: a. loan guarantee I: f. loan insurance 4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity: Pn?me I:ISubAwardee *Name I City of San Jose, Pollce Department Street1 I Street 2 201 West Mission Street ?City State I . Zip San Jose CA: California 95110 Congressional District. if known: CA 15 5. If Reporting Entity in No.4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime: 6. Federal DepartmentlAgency: 7. Federal Program NamelDescription: US DOJ Bureau of Justice Assistance Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program CFDA Number, ifapplicable: I16 . 738 8. Federai Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known: 35 10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Registrant: Pre?x *Fr?rstName . I Middle Name I I Squire Patton I sur?x Boggs LLP I Street 2 I I *Srreeti IZSSO Street NW See 3 My IWashington I t! IDC: District of Columbia I I20037 I b. Individual Performing Services (including address if different from No.10a) arek .LESfName I I I SUf?x I: Gootman *Sireeti I I Street2 I I *City I Istate I IZr?p I I 11 I information requested through this form is authorized by title 31 U.S.C. section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying activities is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed by the tier above when the transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This information will be re ported to the Congress semi~annuaily and will be available for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10.000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. *Signature: IEva Lee I *Name: Pre?x ?First Name I . I Middle Name I Jennifer Title: Senior Grant Analyst I Telephone No.: (408) 537?1618 IDaie! Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form - (Rev. 7-97) Other Attachment File(s) Mandatory Other Attachment Filename: lProject Abstract . I fetid iM?hdatb'ry- Ether; Attachment Delete; Mia'ndatb'ry. oth'er'Attachim?nti lyvtew "Mandath ether.Attachment; To add more "Other Attachment" attachments, please use the attachment buttons below. Add 21 Delete Optima!{OtherEAttaChmeht- 1] 2 View: Project Narrative File(s) Mandatory Project Narrative File Fllename: Pro ram Narrative. df I'Deleit'e' To add more Project Narrative File attachments. please use the attachment buttons below. Add 'Qp'tlbh?al Preje'?t Narrative E?Fu??l Optional} Prp?jeCt emanatim Fae; Viewiopnzonar.?more: Narrative Hie"; Lee, Eva From: DoNotReply@grants.gov Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 3:29 PM To: Lee, Eva Subject: GRANT11952284 Grantsgov Submission Receipt Your application has been received by Grantsgov, and is currently being validated. Your submission was received at Jun 30, 2015 06:27:27 PM EDT Validation may take up to 2 business days. To check the status of your application please click here Type: GRANT Grantsgov Tracking Number: GRANT11952284 We will notify you via email when your application has been validated by Grantsgov and is being prepared for Grantor agency retrieval. DUNS Number: 0635418740000 AOR name: Eva Lee Application Name: City of San Jose Opportunity Number: Opportunity Name: BJA FY 15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Thank you. Grantsgov If you have questions please contact the Grantsgov Contact Center: support@grants.gov 1-800-518-4726 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Closed on federal holidays. PLEASE NOTE: This email is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email for any purpose. Lee,Eva From: . DoNotReply@grants.gov Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 3:29 PM To: Lee, Eva Subject: GRANT11952284 Grantsgov Submission Validation Receipt for Application Your application has been received and validated by Grantsgov and is being prepared for Grantor agency retrieval. DUNS Number: 0635418740000 AOR name: Eva Lee Application Name: City of San Jose Opportunity Number: Opportunity Name: BJA FY 15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) You will be notified via email when your application has been retrieved by Grantor agency. Thank you. Grantsgov if you have questions please contact the Grantsgov Contact Center: support@grants.gov 1-800?518-4726 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Closed on federal holidays. PLEASE NOTE: This email is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email for any purpose. City of San Jose Police Department Proposal Project Abstract FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 1 of 1 City of San Jose Police Department TIPS Grant Proposal PROJECT ABSTRACT The City of San Jose Police Department (SJPD) is applying for the Technology Innovation for Public Safety grant in the amount of $500,000. In the last four years, The City of San Jose has seen a 31% increase in burglaries and 9.8% increase in robberies. SJ PD has seen an increase digital video evidence capturing suspects committing in progress crimes, specifically burglaries and robberies. However with budget cuts and shortage of officers have limited means available to identify unknown suspects. Facial recognition software is needed as it can significantly reduce the numerous hours of investigative time and allow detectives to investigate additional cases and reduce burglaries and robberies. Sharing of facial recognition software with neighboring agencies would reduce burglaries, robberies and other crimes to increase public safety to residents. SJPD will establish a county?wide Facial Recognition Committee. The Committee will consist of 12 partner agencies within the County of Santa Clara. The 12 participating agencies are: Campbell Police Department, Gilroy Police Department, Los Altos Police Department, Los Gatos Monte Sereno Police Department, Milpitas Police Department, Morgan Hill Police Department, Mountain View Police Department, Palo Alto Police Department, San Jose State Police Department, Santa Clara County Sheriff?s Office, Santa Clara Police Department, and Sunnyvale Department of Public Safety. SJ PD and agency Partners will utilize facial recognition technology to aid in identification of suspects crossing jurisdictional boundaries to commit crimes. This new technology will also enhance communication across agencies and increase operational efficiency by sharing facial recognition technology and investigations. Joint investigations may be conducted to enhance prosecutions and convictions to increase public safety. The San Jose Police Department proposes to: (1) Increase the capacity of criminal justice system partners and make progress toward reducing crime through information sharing technology. (2) Establish policies and practices to ensure security controls are in place, as well as privacy policies describing the handling of sensitive or classified information. (3) Establish operational procedures and tracking mechanisms to measure positive impact on crime trends. (4) Increase the number of agencies/organizations receiving and sharing information among criminal justice agencies. At the end of the project, a new facial recognition software will be established with agency Partners to enable information sharing and collaboration among criminal justice agencies to promote public safety and reduce crime. The San Jose Police Department grant OJP permission to share this project abstract with the public. City of San Jose Police Department Proposal Program Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 1 of 10 City of San Jose Police Department TIPS Grant Proposal PROGRAM NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM 1. Identify the speci?c crime/criminal justice problem to address through this program. Describe the process used to assess or determine the nature of the crime/criminal justice problem. Include data that has been used to identify and assess the problem, and demonstrates an understanding of the problem. Residential and commercial burglaries have been on the rise. In the last four years, the City of San Jose has seen a 31% increase in burglary. In some areas of San Jose such as the Almaden Valley, where median home prices are approximately $1.2 millioni, 172 burglaries were reported from January 2015 to April of 2015, increased by 102% compared to the same time period in 2014. The increase of burglaries reported is a result of gang members committing residential burglaries for the quick and large financial gains obtained from the homes. City of San ose Burglary Statistics Burglaries 3940 4223 5206 5173 5167 In the last four years, the City has also seen a 9.8% increase in robberies. In 2010, 976 robberies were reported verses 1072 in 2014. City of San Jose Robbery Statistics *seii'Zi-iYeaf-T? 53 i 25.20.12} 4.257201-3i951 .2014 .7 Robberies 976 1101 1208 1095 1072 City of San Jose Police Department Proposal Program Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 2 of 10 Being in the heart of the Silicon Valley, home of the world?s largest hi gh-tech companies and developers, many homes and business have surveillance systems. The San Jose Police Department (SJPD) has seen an increase digital video evidence capturing suspects committing in progress crimes, specifically burglaries and robberies. However with budget cuts and shortage of officers have limited means available to identify and capture unknown suspects. With the spread of high definition surveillance systems, community members continue to provide law enforcement with high quality images of criminals for analysis. In 2013, 460 pieces of video evidence were uploaded into our Digital Crime Scene database system and in 2014 this number tripled and increased to 1,914. Recently the Mayor of San Jose implemented a security camera registry program where property owners can register their home security cameras with SJPD. With the register, the City can tap into even more images than ever. However, detectives are still unable to quickly identify unknown suspects. Privately owned surveillance systems have proven to be a valuable tool in identifying suspects in some cases, but a vast majority of robberies and burglaries with excellent video evidence go unsolved. Currently, many arrests, thus far have been the result of either an interrupted burglary by the property owner or a neighbor reporting suspicious activity. Capturing robbery suspects is contingent upon patrol officers arriving to the scene fast enough to set a perimeter and contain the suspect. Currently, when a clear still image or video evidence of a suspect is obtained, SJPD rely on the antiquated process of creating flyers and forwarding them to the Probation or Parole Offices in hopes someone will recognize the suspect. Additionally, detectives have to go through the long and tedious process of searching mug shot databases looking for suspects with similar physical characteristics. Meanwhile, unidentified suspects are allowed to continue to victimize citizens. Facial recognition software is needed as it can significantly reduce the number of hours needed City of San Jose Police Department Proposal Program Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 3 of 10 to investigate. Detectives or trained civilian staff can sharpen the focus of an investigation from a potential suspect pool'of 1.8 million images to a handful in a matter of minutes. This can save numerous hours of investigative time and allow detectives to investigate additional cases and reduce burglaries and robberies. Detectives would still use traditional methods of investigation to verify the software?s findings. The software uses a mathematical algorithm to recognize facial patterns and match them against mug shots. It can sharpen pixels in blurry images and re- position faces that aren?t looking directly into the camera. It can also take multiple photos from surveillance footage to create a composite image.ii According to the Northern California Regional Intelligence Center (NCRIC) many suspects are crossing jurisdictions and committing burglaries outside their resident cities, as not to be recognized or identified by law enforcement. Sharing of facial recognition software and investigations regularly with neighboring agencies would reduce burglaries, robberies and other crimes to increase public safety to residents. PROJECT DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION 2. Describe the collaborative governance process that has been put in place to oversee the proposed project, address the identified problem, and roles to be carried out by the governance The PD Financial Crimes Lieutenant will be the Project Manager and will be leading the County-wide Facial Recognition Committee. The Committee will consist of a sworn and/or civilian member from the twelve partnering agencies within the County of Santa Clara in collaboration with the City Attorney?s Office and County?s District Attorney?s Office. The. twelve participating agencies (hereinafter ?Partners?) are as follows: Campbell Police Department, Gilroy Police Department, Los Altos Police Department, Los Gatos Monte Sereno I City of San Jose Police Department Proposal Program Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 4 of 10 Police Department, Milpitas Police Department, Morgan Hill Police Department, Mountain View Police Department, Palo Alto Police Department, San Jose State Police Department, Santa Clara County Sheriff?s Office, Santa Clara Police Department, Sunnyvale Department of Public Safety. Each member of the team will be the designated representative of their respective agency and collect needed statistical information as required by the grant. Each representative will report their statistical information to the project manager. The Committee will have meetings every two months to discuss the implementation of facial recognition technology, create policies and procedures, share suspect information on identified suspects, share success stories, outreach to new potential agencies that commit to participate in the project and develop a county memorandum of understanding. 3. Explain the proposed solution to be implemented to address the identi?ed problem, and enable information sharing between agencies/entities that play key roles in crime- fighting efforts. Include a summary of how the solution will leverage the GSP. SJPD and agency Partners will utilize facial recognition technology to aid in identification of suspects crossing jurisdictional boundaries to commit crimes. Currently, the County of Santa Clara Mug Shot Database has 1.8 million images that are high quality frontal images. Video evidence with unidentified suspects can be compared against this mug shot database. If an identification is made the information will be shared with the other agencies to aid in the apprehension of the suspect. This facial recognition technology will increase the speed and accuracy of criminal investigations involving unknown suspects and by reducing the numerous staff hours involved in making a suspect match. This new technology will also enhance communication across agencies and increase operational efficiency by sharing facial recognition City of San Jose Police Department Proposal Program Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 5 of 10 technology and investigations. Joint investigations may be conducted to enhance prosecutions and convictions to increase public safety. In addition, the face print can be compared to a database of millions of known offenders and within seconds can find a match. Modern day facial recognition technology can evaluate a still image or even can extract a face from video surveillance. A face can be captured at a distance, scanned in seconds and compared against a large database of images. Advancements in hand held units allow officers in the field to take high quality photographs and electronically send them in for analysis, therefore increasing officer safety. Law enforcement is often faced with situations where the only evidence available is an image of a suspect?s face. Our goal is to acquire a system that has a fully integrated facial recognition module to the Digital Photo Manager that can provide accurate, reliable identification using the latest facial recognition matching technology and tools to manipulate and compare images. The Project will comply with the GSP and appropriate privacy policy that protects shared information. 4. Describe the current level of readiness to the proposed solution. Identify any issues/ challenges related to implementation and explain how these will be addressed. SJPD is ready to implement the proposed project to enable information sharing and address the increase in burglaries and robberies committed in Santa Clara County. Once funding becomes available, a Facial Recognition Committee will be established with the agency Partners. The Committee will meet every two months to discuss progress, collect and share information. The privacy policy will be developed in coordination with the agency Partners, City Attorney?s Office, and District Attorney?s Office. The request for proposal will be developed to ensure competitive bidding process of a facial recognition system. City of San Jose Police Department Proposal Program Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 6 of 10 SJPD has been collecting digital mug shots since 1989. The Department has a readily available database of almost two million records. The current mug shot vendor has deployed five facial recognition systems in the state of California and has pioneered a Facial Recognition sharing model that SJPD could participate in. The system deployment will take less than 75? days from the purchase. SJPD will have to overcome the following challenges for the implementation of the Project. Obtain access to mug?shot server - The Santa Clara Sherriff? Department, who currently maintains the mug shot server for the County, would have to allow the facial recognition vendor access to their mug shot database. This will ensure all new arrest images from the county agencies will be automatically accessible to facial recognition. If the Sherriff?s Department prohibits access we will request the server be copied so the program can continue with existing mug shots. Capturing quality images The quality of images captured will improve with the advent of more accessible digital technology. Most surveillance images are not captured in a way that can aid in suspect identification, even with facial recognition software. This Project will utilize facial recognition software that enables these images to be modeled in 3D and rotated, so the images can be more easily compared to frontal facial images. Facial recognition is an emerging technology that has already proven to be a viable crime-fighting tool. This technology will greatly aid the SJPD and?partnering agencies in identifying suspects crossing jurisdictional boundaries and reducing county?wide crime. Vendor sharing restrictions on Facial Recognition system SJPD will only select a vendor that allows information shared among partnering agencies. This requirement will be listed as one of the procurement specifications. SJ PD will coordinate with City?s Purchasing City of San Jose Police Department Proposal Program Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 7 of 10 Department, Information Technology Department and City?s Attorney?s Office for the review and approval of purchase. Developing policies and practices - A draft policy approving the use of this software for investigative assistance in the identification of unidentified suspects and privacy policy will need to be vetted by the City Attorney?s Office and County?s District Attorney?s Office. 5. Address whether and how the proposed solution to be implemented is relevant to other jurisdictions/agencies across the nation. In 2007, the Chicago Police Department used facial recognition to identify a robbery suspect whose image was captured on surveillance cameras and had committed multiple armed robberies in the subway system. A still photo was compared to the 4.5 million criminal booking photos and the suspect was identified as the number one choice. Facial recognition can save a department tens of thousands of dollars in operational cost by identifying offenders almost immediately. The United States Secret service had come to a dead end after spending more than six months investigating an identity theft ring using standard investigation techniques. Images of the suspects were uploaded into a facial recognition program and a positive match was made in less than two hours. i Pierce County Sheriff?s Office in Washington State has demonstrated a previously unimagined accuracy rate of 94% in the first candidate spot, when using mug photos for automated facial identification of individuals during the booking 6. Identify the resources at the state/local/tribal level that will be used to support the - proposed initiative. The SJPD Financial Crimes Lieutenant will be the Project Manager and oversee a county- wide Facial Recognition Comrnittee. Resources should include one representative from each of City of San Jose Police Department Proposal Program Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 8 of 10 the twelve Partner agencies. SJPD will use existing work stations to run facial recognition software. Grant funds will be used to purchase the ?scal recognition software and overtime of staffing to acquiring and working with surveillance images and collaborating with detectives. Capabilities and Competencies SJPD has received and managed federal and state grants since 2005 and demonstrated administrative and financial capacity to successfully implement all grant requirements. The Bureau of Technical Services has a dedicated group of Information Technology specialists to provide the technical guidance, management and expertise required to manage complex projects to successful outcome. The hardware team is responsible for desktop and server computers, network, storage and telephony. The software team is responsible for all ERP, SaaS, Web Services, interfaces, and security design. The unit has implemented and supported the many critical systems, such as our Dispatch communications system, Mobile Digital Communication?s (MDC), Automated Field Reporting (AFR)/Records Management System (RMS), warrants database, fingerprints database, staffing software, and the Office 365 Cloud solutions. The unit has been able to successfully implement projects by utilizing project management tools and techniques. The SJPD deployed a new Automated Field Reporting (AFR)/Records Management System (RMS) in July 2012. SJPD has successfully deployed several mobile technologies in the recent years. They include: Mobile Data Computers deployment of the 3rd generation of MDC that include mobile routers, GPS, detachable computers with touch screens. 400 computers will be upgraded with this improved hardware. CAD, Mobile report writing, RMS All mobile computers have City of San Jose Police Department Proposal Program Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 9 of 10 been installed with Intergraph?s immobile software and Versaterm?s for mobile reporting. Officers could access and write reports in the field. E-Citations project The citation function has been automated and it eliminates the need to generate and review paper citations. Implementation included working with the courts to update forms that are now transmitted electronically. Mobile ID project Utilizing handheld computers to provide mobile identification services, the officers could positively ID suspects at the scene and avoid the time and effort of transporting the suspect to a facility with identification facilities. Plan for Collecting the Data Required for this Solicitation?s Performance Measures 7. Describe the process for measuring project performance. Who will be responsible for performance measurement, and how information will be evaluated the program. Describe the process to report implementation ?nding, the solutions on criminal justice operational practices. Describe both outputs and outcomes anticipated as a result of the implementation strategy, and a process for measuring. I The Project Manager will be responsible for collecting all performance measures data for the grant on a quarterly basis. Each member of the Committee will be the designated representative of their respective agency and collect needed statistical information as required by the grant. Performance measures data will be compiled, reviewed, and verifiedfor accuracy by the Program Manager and entered into a tracking database. The performance measure data will be used and evaluated by the Facial Recognition Committee, City Council, and Chief of Police to address policy and effectiveness of the program. A request form will be created for the submission of images, and a log will be created that records information needed to properly evaluate the utility and effectiveness of this program, including the date of image submission, submitting agency, crime being investigated, results of image comparison, and the person who City of San Jose Police Department Proposal Program Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 10 of 10 preformed the image comparison. To accurately report on implementation findings and the impact of facial recognition technology, committee meetings will be held every two months. The Project Manager will track findings with a database that includes: a unique identifier, date of the finding, a detail description of the finding with contact information, final recommendation, and completion date. Once the finding has been completed, the Project Manager will follow-up with Committee or individuals to inform of final recommendation. Each agency representative will report on crime reductions for burglaries and robberies. The final phase will be to accurately evaluate the performance of the facial recognition software project through analysis of project information that will be maintained in a tracking database to ensure that access and information sharing can be quantified and report on implementation processes at the end of the grant. The grant funding for this Project will provide a successful implementation of a facial recognition software by reducing the number of robberies and burglaries reported by 5% and hold offenders accountable. The Project shall provide an increase in the number of agencies participating in this collaborative process of sharing information and enhancing criminal justice operational practices. City of San Jose Police Department Proposal Program Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Endnotes :DataQuick CoreLogic 91/10349704/story.html City of San Jose Police Department Proposal FY 15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Attachment Timeline Page promote information sharing and collaboration among criminal justice agencies 1A - To increase the capacity of criminal justice system partners and make progress toward reducing crime through information sharing technology Establish a Facial Recognition Committee Establish Project Team Attend regular meetings (every 2?months) to discuss progress and share information. Lt. Messier Lt. Messier Lt. Messier November 2015 November 2015 Starting December 2015 (every 2 months) Goal 2 Develop and enhance policies and practices that leverage technology to promote public safety and reduce crime. 2A To establish policies and practices to ensure security controls are in place, as well as privacy policies describe the handling of sensitive or classi?ed data. Attend meetings to discuss appropriate privacy policies Collaborate with City Attorney and District Attorney? Office, Information Technology Conduct Training for authorized personnel Implementation of privacy policies. Update policies and practices as needed Lt. Messier Lt. Messier Lt. Messier selected vendor Lt. Messier Lt. Messier Starting December 2015 (every 2 months) Ongoing April 2016 April 2016 Ongoing City of San Jose Police Department Proposal FY 15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Attachment Timeline Page 2 of 4 Goal 3 To support implementation of information sharing solutions that have a measurable positive impact on crime trends 3A To establish operational procedures and tracking mechanisms to measure positive impact on crime trends. Attend meetings With the committee (every 2? months) Explore and select tracking methods Create a facial recognition search request form Develop and implement tracking database Purchase facial recognition technology Implementation of operational procedures Conduct training for Sworn and Non?Sworn Personnel Update operational procedures as needed Report to document successful project implementation processes and measurable outcomes Lt. Messier Lt. Messier Lt. Messier Lt. Messier Lt. Messier April 2016 Lt. Messier selected vendor Lt. Messier Lt. Messier Starting December 2015 (every 2?months) November 2015 February 2016 February 2016 April 2016 April 2016 April 2016 Ongoing March 2017 Goal 4 To improve the quantity and quality of evidence? 4A ?-To increase the number of Conduct and attend regular meetings (every 2?months) Lt. Messier Starting December 2015 (every 2?months) City of San Jose Police Department Proposal Attachment Timeline FY 15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 3 of 4 based justice agencies/organizations to discuss progress and share infonnation?sharing receiving and sharing information with programs. information among 0 Campbell Police criminal justice agencies Department 0 Gilroy Police Department Los Altos Police Department 0 Los Gatos Monte Sereno Police Department 0 Milpitas Police Department 0 Morgan Hill Police Department 0 Mountain View Police Department 0 Palo Alto Police Department 0 San Jose State Police Department 9 Santa Clara County Sheriff? 3 Of?ce 0 Santa Clara Police Department 0 Sunnyvale Department of Public Safety Develop MOU with Lt. Messier City - . . Ongoing Parmlpatl?g 33311933 Attorney?s Office City of San Jose Police Department Proposal Position Description and Resume FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 1 of 10 JOB DESCRIPTION Job Title: Crime Investigations Sergeant Reports to: Lieutenant Department: Bureau of Investigations SUMMARY: The position will assist in maintaining police service to the community by providing a management system for assigning, coordinating, directing, monitoring, and solving criminal investigations. In addition, the position will oversee the successful implementation of the Facial Recognition software. The Bureau ensures the proper deployment of resources, determines economical and effective case management, and maintains current personnel policies. RESPONSIBILTIES: Assigns, monitors and reviews crime investigations Oversee daily operations of the program. 0 Work collaboratively with Investigators, the District Attorney?s Office and other stakeholders. 0 Work as a team with law enforcement personnel including, probation officers, detectives and the District Attorney. 0 Maintain current client records and documentation. 0 Possess technical writing proficiency for results of investigations. 0 Responsible for completing all quarterly, and progress reports necessary to meet grant requirements. 0 Collect, review, and verify performance measure data for the grant and enter into a tracking database. 0 Have knowledge of specific laws and procedures pertaining to privacy policy and crime investigations. 0 Meet with Facial Recognition Committee every two months to discuss program progress and share information. 0 Lead the implementation of the Facial Recognition software. 0 Maintain a log for evidence and preserve digital evidence items. 0 Manage grant related budget. 0 Functional proficiency in using Microsoft Office software; Word, Excel, Powerpoint, and Adobe software; Acrobat, and PhotoShop. 0 Basic computer technician skill set to trouble shoot software snags, new equipment installation, new software operating systems, computer repairs and upgrades. 0 Learn and maintain skills running multiple analysis software systems. 0 Attend multiple training curriculums. 0 Meet with staff once a week for supervision and weekly meeting. Other related work assigned by Lieutenant. City of San Jose Police Department Proposal Position Description and Resume FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 2 of 10 QUALIFICATIONS: Excellent organizational skills and detail oriented. Project Management Skills - Ensures support for projects and implements agency goals and strategic objectives, and exhibits behaviors and techniques that enhance the quality of group processes. Have supervisory experience to provide direction, guidance and manage con?icting priorities. Able to work in a crisis atmosphere. Excellent teamwork and interpersonal skills. Excellent written and oral skills. Experience in providing crisis information and referral services in a community agency. Strong computer software skills with emphasis in facial recognition technology and photo editing. Must be able to pass a police background check. Commitment to observing strict con?dentiality requirements. City of San Jose Budget Detail and Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) .fersonn?l 3 . . Name/Position Overtime - Sergeant 430 hours $98.42 (OT rate) 42,32] Total Federal No Personnel are anticipated Total Non-Federal (Match) Total Personnel Federal and Non-Federal . 42.32 :5 Personnel Narrative - Federal - Sergeant overtime of 430 hours to manage the facial recognition project/TIPS grant. Duties include implementing, setting policy and procedures, coordinate information sharing, attend meetings, and reporting to Salary calculations are from Sargeant pay rate table. No fringe will be charged. Personnel Narrative - Non-Federal fMatch) - lof9 City of San Jose Budget Detail and Nanative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) B. . Name/Position Ret_irement_ Healthcare Fringe Bene?ts No Fringe are anticipated. Total Federal Fungi: 180.11 Ef?cient. No Fringe are anticipated. Fringe Non?Federal (Match) Total Fringe Bene?ts Federal and Non-Federal Fringe Narrative - Federal - Fringe Narrative - Non-Feugueral (Match) - 20f9 City of San Jose Budget Detail and Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Airfare $500/person 1 person Mandatory Washington, DC area 2?day meeting for Project Hotel $222/night 3 nights 1 per Management and Implementation Per diem $71/day 3 days 1 person Ground $100 3 days 1 person Total Travel Federal No Travel are anticipated. Total Travel Non-Federal (Match) Total Tra vel Federal and Non-Federal Travel Narrative Federal - $1,679 is budgeted for mandatory training in the Washington, DC area 2?day meeting for 'Proiect Management and Implementation as stated in grant solicitation. The city will follow all city travel policies and the GSA rates. Travel Narrative Non-Federal - 3of9 City of San Jose Budget Detail and Nanative 5 Technoiogy Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Computation Quantity Cost N0 Equipment are anticipated. Total Equipment Federal Equipment- Nan-Fate: . N0 Equipment are anticipated. Total Equipment Non-Federal (Match) Total Equipment Federal and Non-Federal Eguipment Narrative Federal - Eguipment Narrative Non-Federal 4of9 City of San Jose Budget Detaii and Narrative FY l5 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Supply Item Computation I: - No Supplies are anticipated. . $0 Total Supply Federal N0 Supplies are anticipated. $0 Total Supplies Non-Federal (Match) Total Supplies Federal and Non-Federal Supplies Narrative Federal - Supplies Narrative Non-Federal - 50f9 City of San Jose Budget Detail and Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) No construction items are anticipated. Total Construction Federat No construction items are anticipated. Totat Construction Non-Federal (Match) Total Construction Federal and Non-Federal Construction Narrative Federal - Construction Narrative Non-Federal - 60f9 City of San lose Budget Detail and Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) G. "355'I?oit'al. No Consultants/Contracts items are anticipated. $0 Total Consultants/Contracts Federal No Consultants/Contracts items are anticipated. $0 Total Consultants/Contracts Non-Federal (Match) Total Consultants/Contracts Federal and Non-Federal Consultants/Centracts Narrative Federal - Consultants/Contracts Narrative Non-Federal - 70f9 City of San Jose Budget Detail and Narrative W15 Technology Innovation for Pubiic Safety (TIPS) 8 of 9 iroes_:iz H: ether. Casts. Facial Recognition Software and Hardware $400,000 Facial Recognition Software and Hardware maintenance (14% of purchase) $56,000 Total Other Federal No Other Costs items are anticipated. Total Other Non-Federal (Match) Total Other Costs Federal and Non-Federal Other Cost Narrative Federal -Facial Recognition software and hardware is needed to implement information sharing technology solution. The product and information collected can be shared among partnering agencies in the county. The product and information sharing will assist in providing leads, more investigations, arrests and prosecution, as well as a decrease in crime in the area. The Facial Recognition technology can save thousands of of?cer hours looking through photos, creating a cost savings. This also allows of?cers to investigate additional cases. Facial Recognition technology can signi?cantly improve effectiveness. Collaboration with other jurisdictions would give them the ability to utilized facial recognition. Other jurisdictions coutd benefit the same cost savings, increase in leads, arrests, prosecution without purchasing the software and maintenance cost. The city will foilow city procurement polices. Other Cost Narrative Non-Federal - City of San Jose Budget Detail and Narrative FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Israeli?- No Indirect Costs items are anticipated. Total Indirect Federal No Indirect Cost items are anticipated. Total Indirect Non-Federal (Match) Total Indirect Federal and Non-Federal Indirect Narrative Federal - Indirect Narrative Non-Federal - Budget summary Budget Category A. Personnel B. Fringe Bene?ts C. Travel D. Equipment E. Supplies F. Construction G. ConsultantJContracts H. Other Costs . . . . TOTAL PROJECTCOSTS - - - TOTAL PROJECT COSTS. . - 500,000 . 35 i - 500,000 90f9 Approved: OMB No. 1121?0021 US. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS ACCOUNTING SYSTEM AND FINANCIAL. CAPABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE SECTION A: PURPOSE The financial responsibility of grantees must be such that the grantee can properly discharge the public trust which accompanies the authority to expend public funds. Adequate aCcounting systems should meet the following criteria as outlined in the OJP Financial Guide. (1) Accounting records should provide information needed to adequately identify the receipt of funds under each grant awarded and the expenditure of funds for each grant. (2) Entries in accounting records should refer to subsidiary records and/or documentation which support the entry and which can be readily located. (3) The accounting system should provide accurate and current financial reporting information. (4) The accounting system should be integrated with an adequate system of internal controts to safeguard the funds and assets covered, check the accuracy and reliability of accounting data, promote operational ef?ciency, and encourage adherence to prescribed management policies. SECTION B: GENERAL 1. if your firm publishes a generet information pamphlet setting forth the history, purpose and organizational structure of your business, please provide this office with a copy; otherwise, complete the following items: a. When was the organization b. Principle officers Titles founded/incorporated (month, day, year) 88 Llccardo ayor 11/29/1777 0. Employer Identi?cation Number: Norberto Duenas City Manager 94-6000419 d. Number of Employees Full Time: 4865 Part Time: 2279 2. is the firm affiliated with any other ?rm: No 3. Total Salas/Revenues in most recent f"yes". provide details: this is the ?rst line . accounting period. (12 months) this is the second line SECTION C: ACCOUNTENG SYSTEM 3. Has any Government Agency rendered an official written opinion concerning th adequacy of the accounting system for the collection, identification and allocation of costs under Federal contracts/grants? Yes No a. lfyes, provide name, and address of Agency performing review: b. Attach a copy of the latest review and any subsequent correspondence, clearance documents. etc. Note: If review occurred within the past three years, omit questions 2-8 of this Section and Section D. 2. Which of the following best describes the accounting system: I: Manual Automated Combination 3. Does the accounting system identify the receipt and expenditure of program funds separately for each Yes [3 Not Sure contrecb'grant? 4. Does the accounting system provide for the recording of expenditures for each grant/contract by Yes [:lNo Not Sure the component project and budget cost categories shown in the approved budget? 5. Are time distribution records maintained for an employee when his/her effort can be Yes [3 Not Sure specifically identified to a particular cost objective? 6. if the organization proposes an overhead rate, does the accounting system provide for the Yes Not Sure segregation of direct and indirect expenses? 7. Does the accounting/financial system Include budgetary controls to preclude incurring obligations in excess of: I a. Total funds available for a grant? Yes Not Sure b. Total funds available for a budget cost category Personnel, Travel, etc)? Yes GNU Not Sure 8. is the firm generally familiar with the existing regulation and guidelines containing the cost Yes DNO El Not Sure principles and procedures for the determination and allowance of costs in connection with Federal contracts/grants? OJP FORM 7120/1902) (continued on reverse) SECTION D: FUNDS CONTROL 1. If Federal grantfcontract funds are oommingied with organization funds, can the Federal Yes No . Not Sure grant funds and related costs and expenses be readily identi?ed? SECTION E: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 1. Did an independent certified public accountant (CPA) evar ekamine the Yes No ?nancial statements? 2. if an independent CPA review was performed please provide this of?ce with Enclosed IA a copy of their latest report and any management letters issued. 3. if an independent CPA was engaged to perform a review and no report was issued. provide details and an explanation below: We SECTION F: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1. Use this space for any additional information (indicate section and item numbers Ife continuation) None, SECTION G: APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that the above Information is completf and correct to the best of my knowledge. 1? 1. Signature b. Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number San Jose City Hall 200 E. Santa Clara Street 3- Title Julie Edmonds-Mares . San Jos?, CA 95 13 Deputy City Manager (408i 535-8100 SECTION H: CPA CERTIFICATION The purpose ofthe CPA certification is to assure the Federal agency that the recipient can establish fiscal controls and accounting procedures which assure that Federal and Stateliocai funds available for the conduct of the grant programs and projects are disbursed and accounted for properly. tffhe audit report requested in Section 2 above is not enclosed,.then completion of this section is required. 1. Signature b. Firm Name. Address. and Telephone Number a. Title PUBLIC REPORTING BURDEN FOR THIS COLLECTION OF INFORMATION IS ESTIMATED TO AVERAGE 4 HOURS (OR MINUTES) PER RESPONSE, INCLUDING THE TIME FOR REVIEWING INSTRUCTIONS, SEARCHING EXISTING DATA SOURCES. GATHERINGAND MAINTAINING THE DATA NEEDED, AND COMPLETING AND REVIEWING THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION. SEND COMMENTS REGARDING THIS BURDEN ESTIMATE OR ANY OTHER ASPECTS OF THIS COLLECTION OF INFORMATION, INCLUDING SUGGESTIONS FOR REDUCING THIS BURDEN, TO OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS, OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER. STREET, NW, WASHINGTON, DC TOTHE PUBLIC USE REPORTS PROJECT. 1121?7120, OFFICE OF INFORMATION AND REGULATORYAFFAIRS, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND - BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503. OJP FORM 7120.11 (2102) City of San Jose Police Department Proposal FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 1 of 1 Applicant Disclosure of Pending Applications The City of San Jose Police Department does not have pending applications submitted Within the last 12 months for federally funded assistance that include requests for funding to support the same project being proposed under this solicitation and will cover the identical cost items outlined in the budget narrative and worksheet in the application under this solicitation. City of San Jose Police Department Proposal FY15 Technology Innovation for Public Safety (TIPS) Page 1 of 1 Applicant Disclosure of High-Risk Status The City of San Jose Police Department (SJPD) is currently not considered a high risk applicant by the US. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), or by any other federal grant?making agency. The SJ PD has demonstrated administrative and financial capacity to successfully implement all grant requirements. We have provided timely and accurate financial status reports and biannual programmatic reports to the granting agencies. There have been no major findings in recent financial, administrative and programmatic audits.