Case Iled 09/11/15 Page 1 of 12
-- will.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Mane-m

SEP II. 2015

EXECSUMMITS, LLCPlaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION
v.

FILE NO.
MICHAEL HEALY KAREN

HEALY  

Defendants.

VERIFIED COMPLAINT

COMES NOW ExecSumrnits, LLC ("Plaintiff") and files this, its
Complaint, against Michael Healy ("Defendant and Karen Healy
("Defendant and shows this Honorable Court as follows:
PARTIES
1.
Plaintiff is a Georgia limited liability company with its principal place of
business located at 1200 Abernathy Road, 17'h Floor, Atlanta, Fulton County,

Georgia 30328.
2.

Defendant MI is an individual, and upon information and belief, resides at I
3
Defendant KH is an individual, and upon information and belief, resides at I

1

Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 2 of 12

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

4.
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. §
1332 in that there exists diversity of citizenship between the parties as they are
citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00.

5.
Venue is proper in this Court as the damages suffered by Plaintiff occurred in
Fulton County, Georgia.

Defendants transact business in Georgia and have

committed tortious acts in Georgia.
INTRODUCTION

6.
On or about October 22, 2014, Defendant MH was offered work with
Plaintiff as Vice President of Conferences.

7.
On or about October 24, 2014, Defendant MH agreed to perform work on
behalf of Plaintiff, and almost immediately told Plaintiff that Plaintiff's trade
secrets, namely its customer lists, was going to be the key to success.

8.
In Defendant's capacity as Vice President of Conferences, Defendant was
tasked with the responsibility of planning, selling and executing IT conferences all
over the country, and as a result thereof, was going to need access to Plaintiff's
trade secrets, including, but not limited to, customer lists.

9.
The first conference of which Defendant MH had responsibility as Vice
President Of Conferences occurred in Hartford, Connecticut on February 5, 2015,

2

 Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 3 of 12

and based on the number of attendees and sponsors, it was deemed a success by
Plaintiff.
10.
As a result of the success of the Hartford conference, Plaintiff and Defendant
MH discussed hosting additional conferences.
11.
However, unbeknownst to Plaintiff, Defendant MH, on or about February
18, 2015, registered the domain name www.G2Summits.com, which is a trade
name for MarketYu, LLC, of which Defendant MH and Defendant KH are
currently employed.
12.
The website www.G2Summits.com purports to be an organization, G2
Summits, that organizes and produces IT conferences that are substantially similar
to those offered by Plaintiff.
13.

On or about March 5, 2015, Defendant MH proposed to Plaintiff to host an
additional fifty (50) conferences before the end of September 2015, and as a result
thereof, Plaintiff provided Defendant MH with a secure log-in/password to access
Plaintiffs proprietary event registration lists. Defendant MH also requested access
to Plaintiffs trade secrets regarding its customer and contact lists, and when
provided by Plaintiff, Plaintiff was explicit in informing Defendant MH to keep
this information confidential as they were trade secrets of Plaintiff.
14.
Plaintiff has spent many years and a great deal of money in creating its
business secrets and trade secrets and takes great precaution in ensuring they
remain confidential and are not accessed or provided to the public.

3

 Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 4 of 12

15.
Thereafter, Plaintiff began marketing efforts to enroll sponsors, vendors and
referral sources to attend these upcoming conferences, with said marketing efforts
to include the use of Plaintiffs trade secrets.
16.
As a result of its marketing efforts, Plaintiff began receiving requests and
leads from its clients and sponsors to exhibit at upcoming conferences for a set fee;
these requests and leads were forwarded to Defendant MH to be finalized and to
secure payment for Plaintiff.
17.
Beginning in April 2015, and unbeknownst to Plaintiff, Defendant MH
began to systematically re-direct Plaintiffs clients and vendors to G2 Summits and
requested them to make payment to G2 Summits, not Plaintiff.
18.
Defendant KH assisted Defendant MH in re-directing Plaintiffs clients'
payments to G2 Summits/MarketYu, LLC, thereby converting monies belonging to
Plaintiff to Defendants.
19.
On or about May 21, 2015, after eight (8) scheduled conferences had been
hosted by Plaintiff, Plaintiff became aware of the fact that Defendant MH and
Defendant KH had been re-directing Plaintiffs' clients and vendors to G2 Summits
and had been converting monies these individuals and entities paid that were
intended for Plaintiff.
20.
After conducting a search on www.G2Summits.com website, Plaintiff
discovered that many of its sponsors and vendors were prominently featured, and

4

 Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 5 of 12

but for Defendant MH' s access to and misappropriation of PlaintiW s trade secrets,
many of these sponsors and vendors would not be associated with G2 Summits.

21.
On or about May 22, 2015, Plaintiff informed Defendant MH that it had
learned of Defendant MH's fraudulent and illegal activities and requested to speak
with Defendant MH.
22.
Upon being confronted by Plaintiff, Defendant MH refused to acknowledge
his illegal activities and vowed to continue behaving in the same fashion.
23.
On or about May 26, 2015, Plaintiff informed Defendant MH that he would
no longer be allowed to provide services on behalf of Plaintiff.
24.
As a result of Defendant MH' s illegal activities, Plaintiff had to cancel the
IT conferences that it had planned for the summer of 2015.
25.
In June 2015, Plaintiff filed a criminal complaint with the Petersborough,
New Hampshire Police Department in which Plaintiff accused Defendant MH of
conversion and misappropriation of its trade secrets, with damages flowing directly
therefrom in an amount of more than $100,000.00.
26.
Plaintiff currently has an IT conference scheduled to begin on Tuesday,
September 15, 2015 in Los Angeles, California.
27.
As recently as September 2, 2015, Defendant MH has contacted clients of
Plaintiff in an effort to prevent said clients from attending the September 15, 2015
conference; these efforts have included posting false biogs about Plaintiff on the
5

 Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 6 of 12

internet, falsely accusing Plaintiff of having an F rating with the Better Business
Bureau, and otherwise slandering Plaintiff and its employees.

COUNT I - CONVERSION AGAINST DEFENDANTS
28.
Plaintiff hereby re-incorporates and re-alleges its allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 - 2 7 above.
29.
As a result of his responsibility to manage IT conferences on behalf of
Plaintiff, Defendant MH was given restricted access to Plaintiffs business secrets
and trade secrets, including, but not limited to, client, vendor, and referral source
names, addresses, e-mail addresses, and phone numbers.
30.
Upon being granted with this restricted access to Plaintiffs business secrets
and trade secrets, Defendant MH, with the direct assistance of Defendant KH,
redirected many of these individuals to compensate G2 Summits rather than
Plaintiff.

31.
In doing so, Defendants' actions consisted of an unauthorized assumption
and exercise of the right of ownership of personal property belonging to Plaintiff.
32.
As a result of Defendants' actions, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount
to be proven at trial, with said amount being greater than $75,000.00.

COUNT II -TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH
BUSINESS RELATIONS AGAINST DEFENDANTS
33.
Plaintiff hereby re-incorporates and re-alleges its allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1-32 above.

6

 Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 7 of 12

34.
In inducing Plaintiffs vendors, sponsors, and clients to pay monies to G2
Summits, Defendants acted improperly and without privilege, acted purposely and
with malice with the intent to injure Plaintiff, induced third parties not to enter into
a business relationship with Plaintiff, and caused Plaintiff financial injury.
35.
As a result of Defendants' tortious interference with Plaintiffs business
relations, Plaintiff has suffered damages in an amount to be proven at trial, with
said amount being greater than $75,000.00.

COUNT III- DEFAMATION AGAINST DEFENDANT MH
36.
Plaintiff hereby re-incorporates and re-alleges its allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1-35 above.
37.
Defendant MH, via written and oral communications, has falsely and
maliciously made false charges regarding Plaintiff in reference to its trade and
profession that were calculated to injure Plaintiff.

38.
As recently as September 2, 2015, Defendant MH, using Plaintiffs
confidential trade secrets, contacted a client of Plaintiff in an effort to defame
Plaintiff and in an effort to re-direct this client to Defendant MH.
39.
As a result of Defendant MH's actions, Plaintiff has been damaged in an
amount to be proven at trial.

7

 Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 8 of 12

COUNT IV - VIOLATION OF O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 ET. SEQ.
BY DEFENDANTS
40.
Plaintiff hereby re-incorporates and re-alleges its allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1-39 above.
41.

As part of his work on behalf of Plaintiff, Defendant MH was provided
access to Plaintiff's business secrets and trade secrets.
42.
Pursuant to the definition of"Trade secret" contained in 0.C.G.A. §10-1761, Plaintiff's customer and sponsor lists, which included specific information
such as names, addresses, phone numbers, and e-mail addresses, are deemed as
trade secrets.
43.
After being provided with access to Plaintiff's trade secrets, Defendant MH
misappropriated Plaintiff's trade secrets by using improper means, and provided
that information to Defendant KH.

44.
Defendant KH had express knowledge that Defendant MH had used
improper means to obtain Plaintiff's trade secrets, and despite this knowledge,
Defendant KH willingly accepted and has used Plaintiff's trade secrets for her own
purpose.
45.
Both Defendant MH and Defendant KH should be enjoined from using
Plaintiff's business secrets and trade secrets.

8

 Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 9 of 12

46.
As a result of Defendants' actions, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount
to be proven at trial.

COUNT VI - INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANTS
47.
Plaintiff hereby re-incorporates and re-alleges its allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1-46 above.
48.
Plaintiff shows that it has been and will continue to be irreparably harmed by
Defendant MH' s misappropriation of Plaintiffs business secrets and trade secrets,
by Defendants' tortious interference with contractual and business relations, and by
the continued slander of Plaintiff, its employees, and owners.
49.
Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law as an action for damages would not
completely compensate Plaintiff for the misappropriation and disclosure of its
business secrets and trade secrets as said information has taken a great deal of
effort and time to create and preserve, and is virtually impossible to re-create.

COUNT VII - PUNITIVE DAMAGES AGAINST DEFENDANTS
50.
Plaintiff hereby re-incorporates and re-alleges its allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1-49 above.
51.
Defendants' conduct is such that it is clear that their actions arise to willful
misconduct, malice, fraud, wantonness, oppression, or that entire want of care
which would raise the presumption of conscious indifference to consequences.

9

 Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 10 of 12

52.
As a result of Defendants' conduct, Plaintiff should be allowed to recover
punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial.

COUNT VIII-ATTORNEY'S FEES & COSTS OF
LITIGATION AGAINST DEFENDANTS
53.
Plaintiff hereby re-incorporates and re-alleges its allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1-52 above.
54.

Despite efforts made by Plaintiff to resolve this matter, Defendants have
acted in bad faith and have been stubbornly litigious.
55.
As a result of these actions, Defendants shall be responsible for Plaintiffs
reasonable attorney's fees and costs of litigation.

PRAYER
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully prays that it be granted the following
relief:
a.

All damages Plaintiff has incurred as a result of Defendants'
conversion of Plaintiff's property;

b.

All damages Plaintiff has incurred as a result of Defendants' tortious
interference with Plaintiff's business relations;

c.

All damages Plaintiff has incurred as a result of Defendant MH' s
slander of Plaintiff;

d.

All damages Plaintiff has incurred as a result of Defendants' violation
ofO.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et. seq.

10

 Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 11 of 12

e.

A temporary restraining order and interlocutory injunction preventing
Defendants from using Plaintiff's confidential information and trade
secrets;

f.

Punitive damages against Defendants;

g.

Its reasonable attorney's fees and costs of litigation; and

h.

All other relief this Honorable Court deems appropriate.

Respectfully submitted this 11th day of September 2015.

MBWLAW,LLC

Lhc'

~~:_____

Michael B. Weinstein
Georgia Bar No. 746386
949 Image Avenue - Suite B
Atlanta, GA 30318
(404) 228-2629 (0)
(888) 231-0613 (F)

Attorney for Plaintiff

11

 Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 12 of 12

VERIFICATION
Personally appeared before me an officer duly authorized to administer oaths
came

She/{1 fi'b.5' T 4 f £.

who states under oath that she is

employed by ExecSummits, LLC and that the facts contained within said
Verified Complaint are true and correct.

By:She~d
Sworn to and subscribed before. me
this Q day of September 2015.

~