CHEROKEE TRIBAL COURT {$91537 EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS CHEROKEE, ORTH CAROLINA m. A CASE NO- 1? EASTERN BAND 0F CHEROKEE INDIANS FOR JUSTICE ACCOUNTABILITY, Plaintiffs v. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT TERRI HENRY, individually, BILL TAYLOR, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF individually, GENE CROWE, JR. individually, ALAN B. ENSLEY, individually, ALBERT R. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ROSE, individually, VIRGINIA LEE BRADLEY SAUNOOKE, individually, PERRY SHELL, individually, ADAM WACHACHA, individually, DAVID WOLFE, individually, MICHELL HICKS, individually, LARRY individually, DIAMOND BROWN, JAMES OWLE, MICHAEL PARKER, JAMES TAYLOR, and KIM PEONE, in her Of?cial capacity, Defendants NOW COMES Plaintiff, the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians for Justice Accountability, pursuant to Charter and Governing Document Cherokee Code and Rules 57 and 65 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, complaining of the Defendants, Terri Henry, individually, Bill Taylor, individually, Gene Crowe, Jr., individually, Alan B. Ensley, individually, Albert Rose, individually, Virginia Lee Bradley Saunooke, individually, Perry Shell, individually, Adam Wachacha, individually, David Wolfe, individually, Michell Hicks, individually, Larry individually, Diamond Brown, James Owle, Michael Parker, James Taylor, and Kim Peone, in her of?cial capacity, allege and say as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. This lawsuit is ?led on behalf of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians for Justice Accountability to challenge illegal pay raises Defendants named herein gave themselves by way of enacting Resolution No. 261 on October 14, 2014 in violation of the Charter and Governing Document 7 and Cherokee Code 1 The explicit terms of the Charter and Governing Document 7 and Cherokee Code ll7-15(a) state in no uncertain terms: ?no pay raise [shall] take effect until the next council is seated,? and ?[p]ay increases for the Tribal Council members shall not exceed the amount appropriated in that ?scal year for tribal employees.? On October 14, 2014, Tribal Council passed Resolution Number 261 (hereinafter ?Resolution NO. 261? which gave each current and former Tribal Council member an annual salary increase retroactive to 2010. Tribal Council members began to distribute illegal pay raises to themselves in the middle of their terms, in or about October 2014. Likewise, former Tribal Council members received paychecks for retroactive pay increases long after their terms had ended. By enacting Resolution No. 261 Tribal Council unlawfully converted an estimated $1 million in public funds for personal gain to the detriment of Plaintiff?s constituent members. By law, a term on Tribal Council is a service to the Tribe, not an entitlement?om it. This action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to redress their blatantly illegal conduct. PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE 2. The Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians for Justice Accountability (hereinafter is an organization of people who are concerned enrolled members of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians. Among EBCIJA membership are Tribal employees and members who fear retaliation, were they individually named as Plaintiffs to this action. The mission of the EBCIJA is to pursue economic and social justice for all enrolled members and to seek accountability and transparency in Tribal government. Each individual member of the EBCIJA would have standing to sue in their own right; the interests the EBCIJA seek to protect are germane to the organization?s purpose; the organization seeks to protect individual members from retaliation; and neither the claims asserted nor the relief sought herein require the participation of individual members in this lawsuit. 3. Defendant, Terri Henry, is an enrolled member, former Chairwoman of the Tribal Council (2009-15), and resident of Painttown Township. Defendant Henry voted for the passage of Resolution No. 261. She is sued in her individual capacity. 4. Defendant, Vice Chairman Bill Taylor, is an enrolled member, former Vice Chairman of the Tribal Council (2009-present), and resident of Wolfetown Township. Defendant Taylor voted for the passage of Resolution No. 261. He is sued in his individual capacity. 5. Defendant, Gene Crowe, Jr., is an enrolled member, former member of the Tribal Council (2013-15), and resident of Birdtown Township. Defendant Crowe voted for the passage of Resolution No. 261. He is sued in his individual capacity. 6. Defendant, Alan B. Ensley, is an enrolled member, current and former member of the Tribal Council (1 995-current), and resident of Yellowhill Township. Defendant Ensley voted for the passage of Resolution No. 261. He is sued in his individual capacity. 7. Defendant, Albert Rose, is an enrolled member, current and former member of the Tribal Council (2013-current), and resident of Birdtown Township. Defendant Rose voted for the passage of Resolution No. 261. He is sued in his individual capacity. 8. Defendant, Virginia Lee Bradley Saunooke, is an enrolled member, current and former member of the Tribal Council (1 999-current), and resident of Painttown Township. Defendant Saunooke voted for the passage of Resolution No. 261. She is sued in her individual capacity. 9. Defendant, Perry Shell, is an enrolled member, former member of the Tribal Council (2003-15), and resident of Big Cove Township. Defendant Shell voted for the passage of Resolution No. 261. He is sued in his individual capacity. 10. Defendant, Adam Wachacha, is an enrolled member, current and former member of the Tribal Council (2009-eurrent), and resident of Snowbird/Cherokee County Township. Defendant Wachacha voted for the passage of Resolution No. 261. He is sued in his individual capacity. 11. Defendant, David Wolfe, is an enrolled member, former member of the Tribal Council (2005-15), and resident of Yellowhill Township. Defendant Wolfe voted for the passage of Resolution No. 261. He is sued in his individual capacity. 12. Defendant, Michell Hicks, is an enrolled member, former Principal Chief (2003- 15), and resident of Painttown Township. Defendant Hicks, in conjunction with Defendant introduced Resolution No. 261, which included the illegal pay increases alleged herein as well as a pay increase for himself. He is sued in his individual capacity. 13. Defendant, Larry is an enrolled member, former Vice Chief (2003-1 5), and resident of Snowbird Township. Defendant in conjunction with Defendant Hicks, introduced Resolution No. 261, which included the illegal pay increases alleged herein as well as a pay increase for himself. He is sued in his individual capacity. 14. Defendant, Diamond Brown, is an enrolled member, former mber of the Tribal Council (2009-13), and resident of Snowbird Township. Defendant Brown received a lump-sum payment as a result of the passage of Resolution No. 261. Defendant Brown is named as a Defendant herein to give him notice of this action. 15. Defendant, James Owle, is an enrolled member, former member of the Tribal Council (1999-2013), and resident of Birdtown Township. Defendant Owle received a lump-sum payment as a result of the passage of Resolution No. 261. Defendant Owle is named as a Defendant herein to give him notice of this action. 16. Defendant, Michael Parker, is an enrolled member, former member of the Tribal Council (2003-13), former representative of Wolftown Township, and current resident of Big Cove Township. Defendant Parker received a lump-sum payment as a result of the passage of Resolution No. 261. Defendant Parker is named as a Defendant herein to give him notice of this action. 17. Defendant, James Taylor, is an enrolled member, former member of the Tribal Council (2011?13), and resident of Big Cove Township. Defendant Taylor received a lump-sum payment as a result of the passage of Resolution No. 261 . Defendant Taylor is named as a Defendant herein to give him notice of this action. 18. Defendant, Kim Peone, is the Deputy of Finance in the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians Of?ce of Budget Finance. She is a resident of Cherokee, North Carolina. Defendant Peone is chie?y responsible for the administration and enforcement of Resolution No. 261. She is sued in her of?cial capacity. 19. The Charter and Governing Document of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, 18, governs the oath of of?ce for Tribal Council members. It states in relevant part: do solemnly swear (or af?rm) that I will faithfully execute the duties of the of?ce of [Tribal Council] of the Eastern Band of Cherokees and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the charter and governing document and laws con?rmed and rati?ed by the enrolled members of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians. I do solemnly swear (or af?rm) that I have not obtained my election or appointment to Tribal of?ce by bribery or any undue or unlawful means or fraud, and that in all measures which may come before me I will so conduct myself as in my judgment shall appear most conducive to the interest and prosperity of the Eastern Band of Cherokees.? 20. The ultra vires acts of the individual defendants named above and as described herein are blatantly and facially illegal in violation of the plain meaning and explicit terms of the Charter and Governing Document 7, Cherokee Code and the oath of of?ce cited above. The individually-named defendants exceeded the course and scope of their elected of?ce by the unlawful conduct described herein and are thus barred ?om invoking the sovereign immunity granted exclusively to government of?cials acting within the scope of their of?cial duties. 21. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this action. 22. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action. 23. Venue is proper. FACTS 24. The Charter and Governing Document of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians 7 states in relevant part: The members of the Tribal Council shall receive such compensation as shall be appropriated by Tribal Council, with no pay raise to take effect until the next council is seated. 25. The Cherokee Code 117-15, states in relevant part: Tribal Council pay. Pay increases for Tribal Council members shall not exceed the amount appropriated in that ?scal year for Tribal employees. These pay increases shall not take effect until the next elected Tribal Council members are seated, per Charter and Governing Document of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians. 26. Cherokee Code 117-15 codi?ed Ordinance Number 352 (attached hereto as ?Exhibit passed on October 1 1, 2004. The legislative intent stated in Ordinance Number 352 is as follows: 1 Plaintiff attaches hereto the version of Ordinance No. 352 (2004) that was produced by Interim Attorney General Hannah Smith in response to a public records request. WHEREAS, Tribal employees are limited as to pay adjustment received; and WHEREAS, enrolled members feel Council members have not been fair in the past with appropriating pay increases for Tribal Council; and WHEREAS, in the past, Tribal Council members have received increments in the amount of $10,000 to $12,000 for the incoming Council members; and WHEREAS, this amount far exceeds any amount allowed for Tribal employees; and WHEREAS, Tribal Council should set the example for curbing spending and staying within reasonable budget constraints. 27. Pursuant to Section 21 of the Charter and Governing Documt, the Executive Committee of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians presents a pr0posed budget to Tribal Council by July 1 of each year. Pursuant to Section 4 of the Charter Governing Document, the Principal Chief and Vice-Chief constitute the Executive Committee. 28. On July 8, 2014, Defendants Hicks and" introduced Resolution No. 261 (attached hereto as Exhibit Resolution No. 261 is an annual operating budget for Fiscal Year 2015, beginning October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015. ?Retroactive Pay Increases t0 Farmer Tribal Council Members 29. The Fiscal Year 2015 budget contained in Resolution No. 261 introduced by Defendants Hicks and included so-called ?retroactive salary increases? ?retro? pay increases) for former Tribal Council members for Fiscal Years 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014, depending on years of service. 30. Upon information and belief, Defendant Peone distributed the following one-time, lump-sum payments to former Tribal Council members in or around October 2014 as follows: $13,594 to Defendant Taylor; $21,994 to Defendant Brown; $23,565 to Defendant Owle; $21,994 to Defendant Parker. 31. Barring a ruling by this Court rescinding Resolution No. 261 pursuant to Cherokee Code 1 Defendants Taylor, Brown, Owle, and Parker will or could receive increased retirement bene?ts due to the so-called retroactive pay increases, creating a lifelong bene?t ?'om these illegal acts. 2 Plaintiff attaches hereto the version of Resolution No. 261 (2014) that was produced by Interim Attorney General Hannah Smith in reSponse to a public records request. 42. Tribal Council is not empowered to enact legislation during a budget hearing, which is distinguished from an of?cial session of Tribal Council, where Cherokee and English-Speaking clerks take minutes and conduct administrative affairs pertaining to the session, roll is taken, a representative ?om the Bureau of Indian Affairs attends, and the Chairwoman calls the of?cial session to order. None of these actions were taken during the budget hearing of October 14, 2014. 43. During the budget hearing of October 14, 2014, Tribal Council passed Resolution No. 261 without amendment. Defendants Shell, Crowe, Ensley, Wolfe, Taylor, Henry, Wachacha, Rose, and Saunooke voted for it. Councilman Bo Crowe voted against it. Councilwoman Teresa McCoy and Councihnan Brandon Jones were absent. 44. On or around October 21, 2014, at an of?cial session of Tribal Council, Teresa McCoy stated the following regarding Resolution No. 261: ?There was never a discussion [about Tribal Council pay increases]. I?m telling the public, I was never included in any discussion to raise my pay ten-thousand-six or eight-hundred dollars. I was never included in that. Now, if there was a discussion, it didn?t happen here on television in front of the public like everybody else?s budget did. It happened somewhere else. And I know where.? 45. On or around October 23, 2014, Councilwoman Teresa McCoy and Defendant Rose submitted protests of Resolution No. 261 to Defendant Henry. The protests sought to rescind Resolution No. 261 at the November 6, 2014 Tribal Council meeting, citing Charter Governing Document 7, 18. 46. At the November 4, 2014 meeting of Tribal Council, Defendant Rose stated: apologize to the people, to the community . . . If I?d have known then what I know now, I couldn?t support [Resolution No. 261] and I won?t support it. That?s why I?ve got this protest in to rescind this increase.? 47. Also at the November 4, 2014 of?cial session of Tribal Council, Councilman Brandon Jones stated: ?I?ve got a family right now [in Snowbird Community] that?s got small kids at home with both parents working and they?re without power and water right now because they fall through the cracks . . . there?s just a lot of problems we?ve got to ?x before I could ever justify asking for a pay increase.? Plaintiff?s constituent members include individuals, like those described by Councilman Jones, facing severe ?nancial hardships that would be redressed by the adequate ?mding of Tribal programs. 48. Plaintiff?s constituent members sought to address the illegal pay increases through public comment at the November 4, 2014 meeting. They were denied the opportunity to speak. When questioned, ?Where do we go now?? Defendant Henry answered, ?If you choose to bring a lawsuit against the Tribal Council, you have the right to do that and you can go to Tribal Court and do that if that?s what you wish to do.? 49. Upon information and belief, Defendants Henry, Taylor, Crowe, Ensley, Rose, Saunooke, Shell, Wachacha, and Wolfe began to receive the retroactive and prospective pay increases in or around October 2014. The next Tribal Council is not seated until on or about October 5, 2015. 50. Upon information and belief, several then?seated Tribal Council members refused to sign conversion sheets to receive the pay increases. Defendant Peone distributed the illegal pay increases to all twelve Tribal Council members anyway. 51. Defendants Brown, Owle, Parker, and Taylor received retroactive pay increases in the form of a lump-sum ?retroactive pay increases? in or around October 2014. By de?nition, former Tribal Council members are no longer in of?ce. 52. According to Tribal Council?s response to public record requests, the average Tribal employee pay raise was 1% of their salaries in 2013. Historically, pay increases have averaged 3% of each employee?s then-existing salary. Thus, Tribal Council pay raises far exceed ?the amount appropriated in that ?scal year for Tribal employees? under Cherokee Code 117- 15(a). 53. In certain Fiscal Years between 2010 and 2014, Defendant Hicks imposed budget constraints that ?atly barred pay increases for all Tribal employees, including Tribal employees who are members of the EBCIJ A. 54. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff estimates the total amount of unlawfully converted ?inds inclusive of illegal retroactive pay increases, illegal ongoing and prospective pay increases, and prospective retirement bene?ts at approximately $1 million. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION Defendants Henry, Taylor, Crowe, Ensley, Rose, Saunooke, Shell, Wachacha, Woife, Peone Declaratory Judgment Injunctive Relief (Charter and Founding Document 7, Cherokee Code N.C. R. Civ. P. Rules 57, 65) 55. Plaintiff restates and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-54 of this Complaint as if fully set forth. 56. The Charter and Governing Document of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians 7, states: ?The members of the Tribal Council shall receive such compensation as shall be appropriated by Tribal Council, with no pay raise to take e??ect until the next council is seated.? 57. The Cherokee Code states: ?Pay increases for Tribal Council members shall not exceed the amount appropriated in that ?scal year for Tribal employees. These pay increases shall not take effect until the next elected Tribal Council members are seated, per Charter and Governing Document of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians.? 58. The next Tribal Council will not be seated until on or about October 6, 2015. However, Tribal Council members began receiving pay increases pursuant to Resolution No. 261 in the middle of their own terms. 59. There is no legal authority for giving former Tribal Council members a ?retroactive? pay raise. These individuals are no longer in of?ce. 60. As alleged herein, Resolution No. 261 gives current and former Tribal Council members a midterm, retroactive pay increase which exceeds the amount appropriated in Fiscal Year 2015 for Tribal Employees, in violation of Charter and Governing Document 7 and Cherokee Code 1 61. Moreover, Defendants were not in an official session of Tribal Council when Resolution No. 261 was voted on by the individually-named Tribal Council Defendants. Therefore, Resolution No. 261 is void ab initio. 62. There is an actual and existing controversy between Plaintiff and Defendants as to the validity of Resolution No. 261 pursuant to the Charter and Governing Document 7 and Cherokee Code 63. Defendants have been unjustly enriched by the unlawful conduct alleged herein, to the detriment of Plaintiff? constituent members. 64. Pursuant to the Charter and Governing Document 7, Cherokee Code 1 and N.C. R. Civ. P. Rule 57, Plaintiffs are challenging the unlawful actions of the Defendants and are entitled to have the Court declare the validity or invalidity of Resolution No. 261. 65. This case presents an actual controversy because Defendants? present and ongoing unlawful conversion of Tribal funds subjects Plaintiff?s constituent enrolled members and the Tribe as a whole to serious, immediate, irreparable, and ongoing harm warranting the issuance of both declaratory and injunctive relief. 66. Plaintiff seeks an injunction to avoid the continued unlawful conversion of Tribal funds delineated in this Complaint. A favorable decision enjoining Defendants from continuing to disburse illegal pay increases and ordering the return of ?mds already illegally disbursed would redress and prevent the irreparable injuries to Plaintiff identi?ed herein, for which Plaintiff has no other adequate remedy at law. 67. The Defendants will incur little or no burden in respecting the Charter and Governing Document, upholding the Cherokee Code, and discharging their oaths of of?ce. Any purported burden incurred by Defendants would be substantially outweighed by the interests of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians and the interests of justice. The balance of hardships weighs strongly in favor of Plaintiff. 68. Pursuant to the Charter and Governing Document 7, Cherokee Code 7?2, 7-3, 7-4, and N.C. R. Civ. P. Rules 57 and 65, Plaintiff is entitled to declaratory and injunctive relief enjoining all named Defendants ?'om disbursing and converting the illegal pay raises described herein and ordering the return of unlawfully converted funds already received pursuant to Resolution No. 261. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION Defendants Hicks Civil Conspiracy 69. Plaintiffs restate and incorporate by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-68 of this Complaint as if fully set forth. 70. Defendant Hicks and are bound by their oath of of?ce contained in Section 18 of the Charter and Governing Document to ?preserve, protect and defend the charter and governing document and laws con?rmed and rati?ed by the enrolled members of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians.? 71. Pursuant to Section 4 of the Charter and Governing Document, Defendants Hicks and ?shall execute and carry out tribal laws and administer the daily operations of the Tribe.? 72. Defendants Hicks and introduced a budget to Tribal Council that plainly violates Cherokee Code 117?15(a) and Charter and Governing Document 7, as stated herein. 73. Defendants Hicks and had an agreement between one another to introduce and sign into law a budget that plainly violates Cherokee Code 117?15(a) and the Charter and Governing Document 4, 7, and 18. 74. Upon information and belief, Defendants Hicks and also had an agreement with one or more other Defendants named herein, then serving on Tribal Council, to violate Cherokee Code 117-15(a) and Charter and Governing Document 7. 75. Defendants Hicks and committed an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy by submitting Resolution No. 261, containing the illegal pay increases as alleged herein, to Tribal Council on or about July 8, 2014 and signing Resolution No. 261 into law on or about October 14, 2014. 76. Pursuant to Section 13 of the Charter and Governing Document, Defendant Hicks had the opportunity to veto the passage of Resolution No. 261 but failed to do so, another act in ?rrtherance of the conspiracy. 77. Defendants Hicks and are jointly and severally liable for damages resulting from their unlawful acts. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully pray unto the Court: 1. For a trial by jury on all issues of fact; 2. That this Court declare that Resolution No. 261 violates Charter and Governing Document 7, Cherokee Code 3. That this Court preliminarily and permanently enjoin the enforcement and application of Resolution No. 261. 4. That this Court hold all individually named Defendants jointly and severally liable for the return to the Tribal budget of all funds already distributed pursuant to Resolution No. 261 in violation of Charter and Governing Document 7, Cherokee Code 5. That this Court Award Plaintiff reasonable costs expenses, and attorney fees; and 6. For such other relief as the Court may deem just, equitable, and proper. THIS the {9?5 day of October, 2015. Respectfully submitted, BRAZIL BURKE, P.A. .m K. BUKKE NC. State Bar. No. 42209 Attorney for Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians for Justice Accom?ztabilz?ty Post Of?ce Box 120 Asheville, North Carolina 28802 Telephone: (828) 255-5400 Fax: (828) 258-8972 Email: meghann@brazilburkelaw.com TA BLE CHEROKEE COM HOUSE CHEROKEE. NORTH CAROLWA om 11 2am we as (DATE) 151m) WHEREAS, W. withmia?ngpayimnh'r?bal Gunman! WHEREAS. WAS. ?fl-WE. Wdeaquth?bdm? hut-abyme Wh??mmh?r?w Thaw? ?balCmmeiz NOWarmest: and VETOEBI 1 mm:. watchmen: mm mm: 1 hmim.w,Imem of ?rm; mam; TABLED Church; Nerd: Carolina 2014 RESOLUTION NO. 26 (2014) Ym2015, beginning Dunba- 1, 2014 through Septunber 30, 2015; and, Year 2015, beginning October 1, 2014 ?rough Sepmber 30. 2015. 2914 30, 2015. Submitted by: Principal Hicks The attached ResolutioniOrdinanss No. 261 dated July M14 was: PASSED I KILLED . I and rati?ed In Open Council on Mar 14. $114 by 15 voting forthe act and 12 members voting against it as follows: (W APPROVED mean: 1 PRINCIPAI: CHIEF VETO DENIEDI DATE: za? ref-1+ I hereby certify met the foregoing not of the Council was duly: PASSED KILLED I and rati?ed in open CounoII's?er the same has been interpreted by the Of?cial Interer and has been fully and freely discussed. In testimony, whereof. I have hereunto set my hand and af?xed the seat of the said Band of Indians. Superintendent, Cherokee Indian Agency. INTERPRETEEH OMITTED Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians .. Approved 2015 Budget 9 Budget Name: Tribal Council Account Number Account We Revised FY74 Apprand FY15 TYPE: 4 015.75.070.05000000000 IHGOME - TRIBAL WW 7390' 4 detail mug} TYPE: 5 075.75.075.01100000000 SALARY expense 380 889.100 1.017.500 -i 305.519 4.210.327 Sum 4,210,827 070750700220.0000.000 no.0 100.100 171.000 075.75.07003000000000 200.700 027.057 070.70.07004200000000 TEAM-NATIONAL 210.000 100.000 0707000000000000000 mums 7.000 7.000 07070.07000110000000 Weenmss-cmsuunms 41.070 107.000 0753007000400000000 000 00.000 07075.0?500000000000 00070100710000 25.000 25.000 070.75.070.00500000000 mm 0.000 0000000000105 10.200 20.000 07075.07003000000000 acumen-r PURCHASE 1.500 10.000 075.7507513000000000 mme-oawumn 12.744 10.300 07070.07023500000000 omce mm 0 10.000 070.70.070m00000000 1010000000 0 00.000 075.70.070.01000000000 Puauc RELATIONB 103.000 01.000 070.75.000.00100000000 VEHICLE muse 3.000 3.000 070.10.010.00100000000 venuemsa mes 1.000 1.000 0707007000200000000 EQUIPIENT Hummus 2.000 2,000 wa.70.075.0710.0000.000 mam 10.000 10.000 manmssaoamunmo 73.500000 expense 20.550 20.000 0000507501700000000 museum 0 100.400 WW 7103'- Bum 1.708.319 1210.827 ?was: thdnasdny, 002000: f5, 2014 m, .m?m ?nq-n-D? .. ?numb-w an- n. .- W?huwh ?0 mi mum-170. 1&1: . ?3 .Q?Jli 1' .1131 r. Program 075 r11?m mm an; l?ml??uwyut an. 01'? Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians Approved Budget - Fiscal Year 2015 Trlbal Council . frid?F? Em "-i'13g? 325?. .. 1" 013'?: . v' .-.. -.. I - - 0.00 0.00 4.00 12.00 PT TEMP BRDIED Acct if 075. 0019 WE H. TEMP H. PERM Position?! Position Descrip?an Level Hourly Rate Factor 11mm FY14 Approved FYI: 1075-1100001 TRIBAL COUNCIL MEMBER 41.54 2.000 75.000 00.400 0701100002 TRIBAL COUNCIL MEMBER 30.75 2.000 70.000 00.000 0754100003 TRIBAL COUNCIL MEMBER 40.14 2.030 72.500 03.500 0701100004 TRIBAL COUNCIL MEMBER 30.75 2.000 70.000 00,000 0711-1100003 TRIBAL COUNCIL MEMBER 30.75 2.000 70.000 00.000 0751100006 TRIBAL COUNCIL MEMBER 30.75 2.000 70.000 00.000 0715-1100007 TRIBAL COUNCIL MEMBER 38.75 2.000 70.000 00.000 0701100000 TRIBAL COUNCIL MEMBER 30.76 2.000 70.000 80.000 0715-1100000 TRIBAL COUNCIL MEMBER 33.75 2.000 70.000 00.000 0704100010 TRIBAL COUNCIL MEMBER 30.75 2.000 70.000 00.000 0711-1100011 TRIBAL COUNCIL MEMBER 30.75 2.000 70.000 00.000 OTB-1100012 TRIBAL COUNCIL MEMBER 38.?5 2.000 70.000 30.600 0754200001 ENGLISH CLERK-COUNCIL 10.00 1.040 10.400 10.400 0754200002 COUNCIL MESSENGER 10.00 1.040 10.400 10.400 0754200003 CHEROKEE LANG CLERK 10.00 1.040 10.400 10.400 0754200004 CHEROKEE LANG. CLERK COUNCIL 10.00 1.040 10.400 10.400 "-000.100 I a 1.017.500 '57- 01-11: an: is: Cmmn'mnv. Tuesday. 007000:- M. 2034'