13'; 1? New COMMUNITY Te R?pd P?rongo T?rehu Aotearoa nzic.govt.nz 1 fix I I .v lift New Zealand Intelligence if\iV/Hf? I Briefing to th?egymcomi?gy (0-) a ?1 me I Miter ?x ??24 C?x . Xx . Security and 4/ InteJIJI'gencc-x giftim /Wsterofthe activity described above has a covert element. Covert activity is a ("Gratessary part of a government's toolkit. Briefing to the Incoming Minister Page 5 I NEW ZEALAND-INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY 3. How well placed are we to respond to national security threats? We have been subject to a range of internal and external reviews. Last year we underwent a Performance improvement Framework (PIF) review. This highlighted the organisational changes we need to make to better serve you. A I There is a driving force to create a morejoined-up intelligence recognising that effective sight on threats and integrated responsesyregui?reh?nuch \jif . . . . 1? more collaboration between agencnes. More than this. elven theft/anger and volume of?. potential threats to New Zealand interests, 1a better intelligence prioritisation?ystem is developed'll All three organisations have extenswe change prog-ran'irnes' projects to improve compliance systems, customer- I . focused, and Improve governance and We also have projects underway to maintain-awed Upgrade.\our% pa?oilities to meet new -xkiA and evolving threats. Chief among those?p?ro?jeijfs "if! I x. . I I Project CO government and key private sector entities(PSR) helping the public sector and Crown I "entities to keeptheir-information, assets and people safe. xv. you?w?fd?tailed briefings on these projects as required. on organisational improvement and the need to upgrade our capabilities "have putfh?ntelligence community under financial pressurerecap, the principles we are using to make our prioritisation decisions are: a The safety of New Zealand and New Zealanders is paramount. Brie?ng to the Incoming Minister Page 6 I I NEW ZEALAND ta We need to maintain faith with our staff. 13 We should not contemplate short?term savings that compromise important long? term capability. is We should work together to create efficiencies and reduce dupiicatiort wherever we can. i a a We should be mindful of our relationships with our external stakeholders and, partnersx/(Vl\ \l AA- I \xiWhat we need to do in 2015 ?2015 I . - "x We need to finish what is?fnuch more to do. the Act is in dire need of updating and modernisation. Whilej't-he GCSlii-att'was recently amended, it too requires further work to we need to build public trust and confidence inthe intelligence cpmm?nit? The three moistisigl-nificant activitiesd-uring the 2014 2017 period will be the the the 2015 statutory review The gird/toryfgevi?ew of the intelligence agencies, their legislation and the oversight ar/rain "frfents must commence before BOJune 2015. The Government response to th?t/ri?vi?vt should provide a sound basis on which to develop new legislation. We also as an opportunity to help build public trust and confidence. We will provide with a separate briefing on the establishment of the review, but we recommend ?*xthat the terms of reference be prepared and reviewers identified so that work can commence early in 2015. This will allow time for the review to be completed and Parliament to complete consideration of any new legislation the meantime, the world will not stop and wait for us to complete our work. The threats and risks addressed by the can change quickly, Our response to the PIF will make us more alert and more nimble in our leadership and management. We will continue to monitor emerging Briefing to the Incoming Minister Page 7 II - INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY threats and propose responses to you; a current example is foreign fighters. You may wish to look at new powers to address this threat ahead of any legislation coming out of the 2015 review. However, there are also options to incorporate that into the review . . r, v/l, I), .I . . fa?. . 5? . 1 International alliances are fundamental to how the NZIC functions. Mew-jlzeala'nd could ?3 not hope to deliver the current level of security and Our most significant relationship is with the Five Eyes partnership 1' g" <7 y, . ?3 The Five Eyes partnership has been central to New and security since World War ll. The partnership a venture to share effort and results in code break-Eng makingijniivartime. From that experience a much wider frameworkfor cdo'peratiog has evoked, involving all aspects of security and intelligenceIn. What does the Five Eyes actually provsldeynd what are our obligations? a .1 .7 At a technical level, the really advanced technology that New Zealand could nectar hopelto emulate'h?ykitself. This includes the best access cyberseCL?irity, intelligence and assessment Information. {xv We alsoxget act 55 to programmes. professional standards, free consultancy/and 1 2: Doing without the Five Eyes whatever we soent. it would deliver less. We could not re phage?thexlt; A l\ :51, . and the system is certainly more than New Zealand could ever x? contemplate}?- ?F?x?x'x yr" y" x-Kr/l no I kh/ Briefing to the Incoming Minister Page 8 II i ,1 5. New ZEALAND COMMUNITY \roles and respo?s-liirlitles xx Prime Minister and Minister of 1? I . The NZIC is part of the widerxnationlal, security national security sector has two broad groupings: A i i Security and MFAT, NZDF and Ministry of Defence, Policegand Customsot Readiness 'ah?lr?sponsegwh?i??fdeals with civil defence and emergency . x\ . ma a?e enta rigPrime Min?is and Mjii?liste-IIQQTC National Security and Intelligence, you lead the nati?nakseoufity system?Thiszinciudes responsibility for the overall policy settings and .,and?the Officials igprriestic and External Security Committee (ODESC - to be renamed thekjfc'han?gg?p?the Cabinet Committee structure), which is chaired by the Chief . ?x . . . Legislative frame,work??orcthe sector. The mechanisms that support you In this role are he'C?binet chair (the new National Security Committee of Cabinet), Execytfit?bePMC. The Security and intelligence Group of DPMC supports the ODESC system??nd also has the responsibility of leading thejoined up approach of the NZIC. ?sx??imemnister you are also responsible for the National Assessments Bureau. H. . . . . Qt: lfnow this framework by experience; on the emergency Side you Will recall the nterbury earthquakes, and on the security and intelligence side through terrorist responses and New Zealanders in difficulty overseas, amongst other challenges. addition to maintaining sight on risks, planning future capabilities, and responding to issues as they arise, the ODESC system has responsibility for intelligence community planning and performance management. You have particular responsibilities as Prime Minister under the and GCSB Acts and the oversight legislation. They include: Briefing to the Incoming Minister Page 9 a Recommending the appointment of the two Directors (the State Services Commission supports the process, but the decision is yours). a Chairing the Intelligence and Security Committee. Ei Recommending the appointment of the inspector-General and Deputyifnspector- General of intelligence and Security, and Commissioner of Securitywarrants. Minister responsible for GCSB and Minister in charge of Some of your responsibilities as Minister for the GCSB and $2555 amt-he same:a? for". any other Minister, including oversight of the agencies, aridanswering House. The agencies? statutes contain specific information-abouttl'ierole of-tiie?ister. The NZSIS Act defines the Minister as "the Minister the Act defines the Minister as "responsible for statutory provisions that say the functions of the of the Minister". In short this means: You have the final say aboutthe focus ?ch ourefcht?f?hd what kind of functions we perform. We will malgejs Retyou have suffitien?txinformation about the threats, the intelligence the resourc?es?a'vailable, and the options for organising and resoufrtesf'so that you can make informed decisions as thejMini?st?r. The two the operational aspects of the departrnent?>?p - - .. . Although ?SfMlir?iis-tet you will no?tr?g?enerally be involved in the operational activities of the agencies;_yjbudo have\sorn__e specific functions under the two statutes that relate to of these is the approval of warrants and a?tkhorisations for and NZSIS. As part of this role, you can decide where boundaries lie (those not already set by legislation) and, through the \x m?pbsition how we might carry out some aspects of these warrants and . I - . warrant?r'and authorisations provrde the legal authority for much of our more sensitiviexeperational activity. Once we have the authority of a warrant or we conduct fa-njxosfof that activity without further reference to you. I II . I . Briefing to the Incoming Minister Page 10 1/ I f? i INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY II. How we keep you briefed and up to date Depending on Ministerial requirements and subiect to ODESC oversight especiain the FIFA Under 20 World Cup and the Cricket World Cup, both of which will in the first haif of 201 5. We would value an initial disgussion with you and your offices about howr?vou would jke the relationship to work. - xv . @nge?you havefde.ci?ieq on group disfussjh?pw 'we can best support those meetingshave been workIng on ways to . I. -. ?t Engagement with the We have been plan to better inform the public of what we do and We have established a small communications ma?a?{support the thr'eecere?NZiC agencies. There has been a lot of work setting up supporting the Directors and DPIVIC Chief Execut'wejw?ith publif?engiager?ents, establishing relationships with media and other government a NZIC website with information from the three'com'agencies in on'e?place. The new-initiatives we include in depth background briefings to opportunities for the Directors, greater discussion of aide,? r" (to: Twill engage-withtyom offices as the programme develops. This external ?xepgagemgergtqugis..'is new for us and it goes against the cultural DNA of our are stiil grounded in the "need to know" principle. Your support an neporagement would be very helpful. with the Leader of the Opposition and Parliament \q 4 . . . I recognItIon Is gIven to the role of Leader of the OppOSItIon In the GCSB and Acts. This reflects the traditional ?bipartisan? approach to national security. 5. a( or jug A bipartisan approach is particularly important during the passage of legislation, when investment is needed, or when responding to emerging situations. Briefing to the incoming Minister Page 11 I I ZEALAND INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY s. ol (ziriyc? a {CV/ism \?~er 5. ex. - Kim?33? Ir ?x kw Summary .. a I L. . Overall, we are very optimi?tic-ja?oufthe dirtatti?h?otthange the community has taken. The told us we hayealonEway to tragel, attd'mlre have an extensive change programme underwayifj?i ,1 ?1 The threats are undoubtedly growing (not least the risks of onqu11ejvi_9lent extremismaijd cyber security). Some of these threats we have never seen is to gr?igi these up and help you ensure the national securitypf?N much look forward to working with you and for you forth ex?e Bee?s. . IR I - .2517?" I . [All - I I ?a ?rgowf 2rd Broad Ian Fletcher Rebecca Kitteridge Chief Executive, DPMC Director, GCSB Director of Security, Briefing to the incoming Minister Page 12