OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General Division of Criminal Law Appeals, Writs & Trials Unit This annual report is available on the California Attorney General’s website: http://ag.ca.gov Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................1 Table 1: Arrests and Convictions Resulting from Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014.....................................................................................................................................................2 Table 2: General Description of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 ...................3 Table 3: Electronic Interception Orders Issued by Judges And Court Activity During Calendar Year 2014 ............................................................................................................................................4 Table 4: Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 ................................................................................................................5 Table 5: Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report ...................................................................59 Table 6: Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 ......................................113 Table 7: Jurisdiction Reporting No Electronic Interception Activity During Calendar Year 2014 ........................................................................................................................................158 Table 8: Summary of Supplemental Reports for Interceptions Conducted in Prior Years ...........159 Table 9: List of Electronic Interception Orders Approved But Never Used or Installed - Calendar Year 2014.. ...................................................................................................................163 Appendix A: Penal Code section 629.62 “Report by Attorney General” ......................................165 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Executive Summary The Attorney General’s Electronic Interceptions Report 2014, is issued pursuant to Penal Code section 629.62 and can be referenced on the Attorney General’s website at http://oag.ca.gov. Electronic intercepts are legally sanctioned surveillance of electronic communications for law enforcement purposes. This report contains electronic interception data and describes how electronic intercepts have enhanced the ability of state and federal law enforcement agencies to identify and dismantle drug trafficking organizations (DTO), solve serious and violent crimes and incapacitate criminal street gangs. Multi-national DTO’s, criminal street gangs, and individuals often use telecommunications to advance their illegal objectives. These illegal objectives include kidnapping, organized crime, drug trafficking, and murder. Through use of court-authorized electronic intercepts, law enforcement has an effective tool to investigate and prevent these crimes. In some cases, electronic intercepts have led to solving decade-old crimes where no other avenue produced results. In other cases, DTO activity was halted and millions of dollars in narcotic proceeds as well as voluminous amounts of narcotics were seized. Several counties provide exemplary examples of the benefits of electronic intercepts: Stanislaus County (2014-STA-70) utilized electronic intercepts to dismantle a drug smuggling cartel operating from Mexico to Northern California. As a result of the interceptions, over 700 pounds of methamphetamine was seized. Riverside County (2014-RIV-1097) worked with federal agents in using electronic intercepts to gather intelligence to stop a large-scale cocaine smuggling operation based out of two South American countries. Sonoma County (2014-SON-7) successfully employed electronic intercepts to gather crucial information on a 1992 unsolved murder. A Los Angeles County (2014-LA-811) investigation, which included electronic intercepts, of a DTO concluded with sixteen people arrested with more arrests expected, the seizure of $1 million in narcotic proceeds, 600 pounds of methamphetamine, and multiple vehicles. From intelligence-gathering to arrests and prosecutions, these examples demonstrate that electronic intercepts are essential tools that law enforcement employs to combat the ever-changing criminal element. Though the report is divided into separate tables, the tables should be read in conjunction with one another to evaluate the impact intercepts have on public safety. Tables 1, 2, and 3 reflect the statistics of arrest, convictions and nature of intercept orders and post-intercept court activity. Table 4 contains a description of and optional commentary for each intercept. Table 5 represents compliance with the inventory notice requirement given to those who were subjected to intercepts. Table 6 shows the cost of each intercept. Table 7 lists counties with no intercepts to report. Table 8 provides supplemental information for intercepts approved prior to 2014 but completed later. Finally, Table 9 lists intercept orders which were never used. If you have any questions or comments about this report, please contact the Criminal Law Division of the Attorney General’s Office at (916) 445-9555. 1 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 1 Arrests and Convictions Resulting from Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 20141 3.3 2.0 2 4 11 Los Angeles Madera 129 8 33 0 3.0 1 30 Merced Napa 1 1 0 0 Orange Placer 3 2 3 4 1.5 4.0 3 4 Riverside Sacramento 624 6 176 19 2.2 4.8 3 San Bernardino San Diego 30 14 51 34 3.0 5.7 28 San Joaquin Santa Barbara 18 4 29 10 5.8 3.3 5 25 10 Santa Clara Sonoma 13 2 35 1 8.8 1.0 2 1 11 Stanislaus Tulare 14 11 12 3 4.0 1.5 2 28 16 3.2 971 482 Ventura Total: Avg. per Order 13 4 2 Total 19 2 23 Other Kern Kings 20 2 Kidnapping 11.5 2 Terrorism 0 23 Narcotics 2 24 12 2 Murder El Dorado Fresno 2 Number of Persons Convicted Conviction Offenses Other 7.0 1.0 Kidnapping 14 2 Terrorism 10 6 Narcotics Avg. per Order Alameda Contra Costa Gang No of Orders Murder Reporting Jurisdiction Total Arrest Offenses Gang Number of Persons Arrested 0 2 1.0 0 0 20 3 3 0 0.8 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 166 16 23 15 32 0 0 18 2 18 0.1 3.0 10 5 0 5 1.7 28 3 3 0 0.8 10 1 1 0 0.3 7 1.4 2 6 8 59 109 351 7 7 1 0 23 2 2 2 5 4 37 0 0 0 41 1 The disparity between “Number of Persons Arrested” and “Number of Persons Convicted” may be attributed to the fact that a number of those arrested are pending either charges or trial, a process which could take a period of time, or that the intercept was a part of a large-scale investigation. 2 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 2 General Description of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 2 Fresno Kern 24 19 3 6 Kings Los Angeles 2 129 2 18 Madera Merced 8 1 Napa Orange 1 3 1 3 Placer Riverside 2 624 2 2 603 Sacramento San Bernardino 6 30 2 8 4 22 San Diego San Joaquin 14 18 2 18 12 15 Santa Barbara Santa Clara 4 13 1 2 3 6 3 10 Sonoma Stanislaus 2 14 2 1 1 13 Tulare Ventura 11 28 3 7 11 24 4 14 3 21 13 104 1 4 10 6 2 6 2 20 22 18 1 2 126 1 4 1 67 8 1 1 2 3 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 8 1 1 3 1 3 2 624 2 622 6 30 6 30 14 14 14 17 4 13 4 13 2 14 2 14 10 28 11 28 Pager Land Line 10 1 8 Cell Phone Other Portable device Public Area Business Residence Other 4 Targeted Device Other 6 2 Targeted Location Computer 10 Kidnapping 8 Alameda Contra Costa El Dorado Terrorism 10 Narcotics No. of Orders Gang Reporting Jurisdiction Murder Targeted Offenses (Offenses Specified in Order) 9 1 1 3 4 2 3 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 3 Electronic Interception Orders Issued by Judges And Court Activity During Calendar Year 20142 2 1 3 6 2 1 1 10 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 37 36 30 2 2 18 191 184 7 2 18 18 10 10 1 3 2 1 2 30 30 10 30 1 1 30 30 30 1 3 3 27 15 2 4 27 2 4 27 15 30 30 0 23 53 10 21 19 18 36 28 63 5 5 18 27 16 42 42 28 16 26 5 26 36 23 2 1 2 Pending 230 153 20 499 366 35 4672 222 63 5 16 35 17009 98 1259 590 497 63 337 9 359 394 642 Denied 300 180 21 780 600 60 4969 222 63 30 90 60 24403 140 1440 720 600 90 472 60 480 434 840 Granted Avg. per Order 1 Actual Days Average Length Not Installed/ Installed Not Used Denied Modified/Amended Granted Applications Not Installed/ Installed Not Used Denied 9 6 2 24 19 2 129 8 1 1 3 2 602 6 30 14 17 4 13 2 14 11 28 Modified/Amended 10 6 2 24 19 2 129 8 1 1 3 2 624 6 30 14 18 4 13 2 14 11 28 Total Motions Duration of to Wiretaps Suppress Requested Days Alameda Contra Costa El Dorado Fresno Kern Kings Los Angeles Madera Merced Napa Orange Placer Riverside Sacramento San Bernardino San Diego San Joaquin Santa Barbara Santa Clara Sonoma Stanislaus Tulare Ventura Granted Reporting Jurisdiction Applications Number of Intercept Orders Number of Extensions Number of Trials Resulting from Intercepts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 The purpose of obtaining electronic intercept evidence is not always trial-focused and may relate to further investigation at the state or federal level as well as crime prevention. 4 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Alameda Contra Costa EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted 3 (%) 257 9,967 4 96 2014-ALA-20 18 240 1 99 2014-ALA-24 120 11,592 3 97 2014-ALA-28 45 555 10 90 2014-ALA-29 433 6,908 17 83 2014-ALA-30 257 8,395 2 98 2014-ALA-31 205 7,407 9 91 2014-ALA-32 167 5,593 23 77 2014-ALA-33 92 2,352 4 96 2014-ALA-34 144 4,185 4 96 13 87 2014-CO-1 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 (%) 2014-ALA-19 2014-CO-2 El Dorado Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications Wiretap targeted a murder suspect. Suspect was arrested and charged based in part upon the intercepted communications and surveillance operations conducted during the interception. Case is pending. Wire tap operation targeted a murder suspect. Suspect was arrested and charged based in part upon the wire interception and accompanying surveillance. Case is still active and pending. 8,230 180 2,205 2014-CC-8 2,017 2014-CC-9 3,011 See CCCDA 14-001. 2014-CC-10 0 See CCCDA 14-006. 2014-CC-11 0 2014-ED-1 64 996 1 99 A phone intercept was conducted to investigate a potential murder-forhire plot on a peace officer. 2014-ED-2 27 411 1 99 See 2014-ED-1. Comments are not mandated and may be edited 5 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Fresno EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 (%) 2014-FR-6 187 8,320 11 89 This wiretap was used to investigate an attempted murder. The interceptions provided information regarding narcotic trafficking. Detectives arrested five suspects and seized two vehicles and $14,110 in narcotic proceeds, 37 pounds of marijuana, 2,336 milliliters of Codeine and 29 Oxycodone tablets. The suspects arrested are known to be involved in narcotic sales and violent crimes. The seized narcotics and the suspects arrested will have a positive impact on the community. 2014-FR-7 36 339 3 97 See 2014-FR-6. 2014-FR-8 9 316 3 97 See 2014-FR-6. This wire interrupted a major supply source of methamphetamine in the Fresno area. The target phone was intercepted and monitored to identify those involved in transportation and distribution. This wire is part of an ongoing effort to interupt a major supply source of methamphetamine in the Fresno area. 2014-FR-9 12 239 66 44 2014-FR-11 26 563 52 48 2014-FR-13 6 108 41 59 See 2014-FR-11. 2014-FR-14 16 272 73 27 See 2014-FR-11. 2014-FR-15 23 648 39 61 See 2014-FR-11. 2014-FR-16 62 2,166 39 61 2014-FR-17 29 565 28 72 2014-FR-18 84 1,266 47 53 Through related wires, agents identified a drug trafficking organization (DTO) that operated out of Southern California, Arizona, and Mexico. The investigation is ongoing and dismantling of the DTO is anticipated. This wire resulted in the arrest of one subject, seizure of 17 pounds of narcotics, as well as the identification of co-conspirators and sources of supply. One additional arrest is expected and an additional warrant for arrest was issued for major narcotics transactions. See FR-2014-16. 6 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Fresno (cont’d) Kern EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 (%) 2014-FR-19 270 1,106 29 71 During this investigation, agents made 43 arrests, seized 7 pounds of cocaine, 43 pounds of methamphetamine, 15 guns, $52,000 in narcotic proceeds, and served 18 search warrants. Subsequently, the investigation targeted a specific criminal street gang and dismantled a gang-related DTO and removed much of the capability of that gang to raise funds through the distribution of illegal drugs. 2014-FR-20 44 40 30 70 See 2014-FR-19. 2014-FR-21 204 3,932 42 58 See 2014-FR-19. 2014-FR-22 0 0 0 0 See 2014-FR-19. 2014-FR-23 295 690 24 76 See 2014-FR-19. 2014-FR-24 268 1,436 28 72 See 2014-FR-19. 2014-FR-25 87 532 32 68 See 2014-FR-19. 2014-FR-26 79 901 29 71 See 2014-FR-19. 2014-FR-27 322 9,338 19 81 See 2014-FR-19. 2014-FR-28 62 205 33 67 See 2014-FR-19. 2014-FR-29 158 425 32 68 See 2014-FR-19. 2014-FR-30 92 169 29 71 See 2014-FR-19. 2014-FR-31 116 168 39 61 See 2014-FR-19. 2013-KE-35 206 5,557 14 86 A county, state, and federal task force investigated a regional drug trafficking organization (DTO) operating in Central California, with suspected direct ties to an unknown DTO in Mexico. The DTO was believed to have been capable of distributing multiple pounds of illicit narcotics, specifically crystal methamphetamine (45 lbs. at a time) and heroin, within Kern County. This investigation is ongoing with plans to disrupt and/or dismantle the major drug operation. 2013-KE-36 206 609 15 85 See 2014-KE-35. 7 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Kern (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 (%) Law enforcement recovered two firearms, six pounds of crystal methamphetamine, quantities of cocaine and heroin, and 200 marijuana plants during an investigation into a multi-state and multi-country drug organization. This investigation resulted in the seizure of the account, which contained $40,000, and the arrests of two people who pled guilty and have been sentenced. During a multi-agency (county/state/federal) ongoing investigation into importation and distribution of narcotics, agents were able to disrupt and impede the subject’s ability to import narcotics. At the conclusion of the wiretap, the multiagency task force successfully dismantled the drug trafficking organization (DTO). Law enforcement was also able to make a large impact on two local gangs. Without the evidence obtained from intercepted conversations, this investigation would not have been as successful in identifying the known gang members. 2014-KE-37 2 14 93 7 2014-KE-38 1 15 100 0 2014-KE-39 148 16,760 2 98 2014-KE-40 1 4 50 50 See 2014-KE-38. 2014-KE-41 40 2,518 3 97 See 2014-KE-39. 2014-KE-42 22 581 4.5 95 See 2014-KE-39. 2014-KE-43 75 11,930 2 98 See 2014-KE-39. 2014-KE-44 0 See 2014-KE-39. 2014-KE-45 4 248 10 90 A multiagency and multistate investigation identified a large scale cocaine broker working in Kern County who was directly connected to drug trafficking cartels located in Tijuana. Agents passed investigative leads to law enforcement officers in other counties and states as a result of this wiretap investigation. The investigation is ongoing. 2014-KE-46 3 86 45 55 See 2014-KE-45. 2015-KE-47 14 190 35 65 Further investigation regarding a double murder is pending. 2015-KE-48 14 38 0 100 See 2014-KE-45. 8 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Kern (cont’d) Kings Los Angeles EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 (%) This investigation identified a narcotics trafficker dealing in high quantities of crystal methamphetamine. Three subjects were successfully identified and federally indicted. Furthermore, the investigation resulted in the seizure of $14,004 and 3 pounds of crystal methamphetamine. The availability and amount of crystal methamphetamine in the area has been decreased. This was a homicide investigation regarding a conspiracy to commit murder. Detectives arrested both conspirators and this case is pending in the Kern County Superior Court. 2014-KE-49 5 1,639 35 65 2014-KE-50 14 5,626 2 98 2014-KE-51 14 5,626 2 98 See 2014-KE-50. 2014-KE-52 14 5,626 2 98 See 2014-KE-50. 2014-KE-53 14 5,626 2 98 See 2014-KE-50. 2014-KI-16 9 4,200 2014-KI-17 1 6 2014-LA-747 294 8,258 2014-LA-748 43 315 2014-LA-749 380 3,915 2014-LA-750 47 967 2014-LA-751 96 3,506 2014-LA-752 5 220 24 76 2014-LA-753 380 3,915 14 86 2014-LA-754 50 566 24 76 An automatic rifle and marijuana were seized. Three people were arrested for a gang-related homicide. Wire was initiated to intercept evidence for a murder-for-hire plot. The wiretap provided additional evidence against the suspect, a gang member. An arrest is pending. No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period. 14 100 This WT2 report covers Los Angeles County wiretap 14-01 for Target Telephone #50. The subject discontinued using this phone. This investigation is ongoing. This WT2 report covers Los Angeles County wiretap 14-03 for Target Telephone #51. The subject discontinued using both phones as their primary means of communication. The investigation is ongoing. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. 9 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Los Angeles (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-LA-755 96 3,506 2.5 97.5 2014-LA-756 5 64 84 16 2014-LA-757 380 5,558 14.5 85 2014-LA-758 103 3,501 37 63 2014-LA-759 37 568 16 84 2014-LA-760 4 23 50 50 2014-LA-761 43 315 4 96 2014-LA-762 0 0 2014-LA-763 64 2,353 8 92 2014-LA-764 79 2,769 32 68 2014-LA-765 968 8,462 4 96 2014-LA-766 50 2,454 20 80 2014-LA-768 75 1,001 20 80 2014-LA-769 0 2014-LA-770 36 716 18 82 2014-LA-771 19 3,433 10 90 2014-LA-772 169 6,563 36 64 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. The subjects discontinued using both phones as their primary means of communication. The investigation is ongoing. Based on intercepted conversations, law enforcement conducted surveillance and served a search warrant at a stash location. Investigators seized 50 pounds of methamphetamine, 10 kilograms of cocaine and $21,900 in narcotic proceeds. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period. No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. The ubject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period. The subject used the phone to conduct narcotics trafficking activities involving marijuana. The investigation is ongoing. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. One arrest was made and 36 grams of cocaine was seized. 10 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Los Angeles (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-LA-773 61 2,771 13 87 2014-LA-774 105 2,750 20 80 2014-LA-775 125 1,965 11 89 2014-LA-776 93 821 27 73 2014-LA-777 10 175 15 85 2014-LA-778 63 776 22 78 2014-LA-779 86 4,501 14 86 2014-LA-780 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 0 2014-LA-781 5 1,342 12 88 2014-LA-782 5 61 10 90 2014-LA-783 27 559 23 77 2013-LA-786 846 33,991 2014-LA-787 16 621 7 93 2014-LA-788 279 4,823 20 80 The subjects of this investigation are believed to have temporarily suspended their narcotics trafficking due to seizures of narcotics and proceeds of narcotics in the days and weeks prior to this wiretap. The investigation is ongoing. One arrest was made, and agents seized 9 pounds of methamphetamine and $25,000 in narcotic proceeds. Based on interceptions obtained from Wiretap 14-42, 2 subjects were arrested, and 6 pounds of methamphetamine were seized. The subject obtained a new phone which was being used as the primary means of communication. The subject was arrested with 11 kilograms of cocaine. No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. The subject discontinued use of this phone after an unrelated arrest. The investigation is ongoing. The intercepted communications have assisted investigators identify other phone numbers and individuals engaged in the distribution of narcotics. The investigation is ongoing in order to identify and dismantle this Southern California-based narcotics trafficking network. Subjects were believed to be invovled in murders that occurred in 2012 and 2013. Target telephone intercepted for approximately 8 days before the phone was disposed. The subjects discontinued using these phone. The investigation is ongoing. 11 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Los Angeles (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 (%) 2014-LAK-2 168 2,909 37 63 The subject was involved in a money-laundering operation. This intercept provided significant leads to other investigations and cases. The investigation is ongoing. 2014-LA-789 168 2,909 37 63 See 2014-LAK-2. 2014-LA-790 205 10,813 5 95 2014-LA-791 187 2,061 6 94 1,286 3 97 2014-LA-792 2014-LA-793 25 2,890 2 98 2014-LA-794 24 159 25 75 2014-LA-795 95 2,167 45 55 2014-LA-796 8 185 26 74 2014-LA-797 28 3,513 29 71 0 0 0 13-155 2014-LA-800 51 316 25 75 2014-LA-801 85 953 60 40 2014-LA-804 91 1,464 3 97 2014-LA-805 217 10,365 9 91 2014-LA-806 15 272 48 52 Intercept for an ongoing homicide investigation with pending prosecution. Subjects were believed to be involved murders that occurred in 1992. Interception confirmed narcotics trafficking activity. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. Interceptions led to the identification of numerous sources of supply and have resulted in the initiation of additional federal investigations. Subject(s) were believed to be involved in a 1994 murder. Subject believed to be using devices to conduct narcotics trafficking activities involving cocaine methamphetamine, and marijuana. The investigation is ongoing. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. During the interception, investigators were able to learn about the structure, members, and methods of operation of this drug trafficking organization (DTO). The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. The subject discontinued using these phones. The investigation is ongoing. 12 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Los Angeles (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-LA-807 36 456 17 83 2014-LA-808 0 0 0 0 2014-LA-809 87 6,426 15 85 2014-LA-810 46 711 36 64 2014-LA-811 162 2 19 81 2014-LA-812 62 3,137 46 53 2014-LA-813 6 67 30 70 2014-LA-814 3 206 7 93 2014-LA-815 36 1,278 13 87 2014-LA-816 29 1,291 18 82 2014-LA-817 0 4 0 100 2014-LA-818 78 3,052 4 96 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 Interceptions from wiretap 14-85 contributed to the arrest of one person and the seizure of 2 kilograms of heroin. The subjects discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. Based on the intercepted calls obtained as a result of this wiretap, narcotics and narcotic proceeds were seized and six individuals have been identified for future criminal charges. The investigation is ongoing. See 2014-LA-809. Investigation into the trafficking of methamphetamine from Mexico into California. The results of the five month long wiretap investigation resulted in seizure of: 600 pounds of methamphetamine, 1 million dollars, 16 arrests (four more pending) and five seized vehicles. Other than the four currently convicted on federal charges, the remaining individuals have been or are being filed on for state charges involving the transportation of methamphetamine. Investigation has led to the identification of additional coconspirators, tracking methods, and the initiation of additional federal investigations. No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period. This wiretap helped identify additional members within the organization, including a possible source of supply. Interceptions led to the identification of narcotics traffickers operating in Los Angeles County and their methods used to traffic narcotics into and through the United States. The investigation is ongoing. The subject is using multiple phones. The investigation is ongoing. No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period. No significant enforcement activity during this 30 day period. 13 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Los Angeles (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-LA-820 116 4,688 12 88 2014-LA-821 32 1,793 12 88 2014-LA-822 110 7,887 2014-LA-823 626 19,747 3 97 2014-LA-824 0 2 0 0 2014-LA-825 70 319 3 97 2014-LA-826 61 11,894 40 60 2014-LA-827 12 208 4 96 2014-LA-828 14 774 8 92 2014-LAS-6 1 131 0 100 2014-LA-829 36 712 35 65 2014-LA-831 62 3,137 47 53 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. The intercepted communications over 14-26 have assisted investigators identify other phone numbers and individuals engaged in the distribution of narcotics. Investigators will continue to investigate these phone numbers and indivduals in order to identify and dismantle this Southern California based narcotics trafficking network. Subjects involved in a conspiracy to commit murder. The investigation is ongoing and arrests are imminent. The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing. Subject was involved in a conspiracy to commit murder. The investigation is ongoing and arrests are imminent. The wiretap assisted in the disruption of a drug trafficking organization (DTO). It also led to the seizure of $33,500 in narcotic proceeds, 3,710.8 grams of methamphetamine, 568.7 grams of cocaine, and 5.4 grams of crack cocaine. The investigation also led to the arrest of six subjects. Subject is involved in the murders that occurred in 2012 and 2013. No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period. This wiretap was to help identify additional members within the organization, including a possible source of supply. Interceptions have identified multiple narcotics distributors and sources of supply and additional federal investigations are ongoing. Interceptions have led to the identification of additional coconspirators, trafficking methods, and the initiation of additional federal investigations. 14 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Los Angeles (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-LA-832 61 2,449 80 20 2014-LA-833 109 8,850 37 63 2014-LA-834 181 5,647 68 32 2014-LA-835 94 1,965 40 60 2014-LA-836 1 131 0 100 2014-LA-838 32 1,653 8 92 2014-LA-839 54 1,336 36 64 2014-LA-840 28 3,513 29 71 2014-LA-841 28 166 6 94 2014-LA-842 0 3,986 8 92 2014-LA-843 0 0 0 100 2014-LA-844 77 1 0 100 2014-LA-845 39 626 9 93 2014-LA-847 0 3 0 100 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 See 2014-LA-826. Interception led to intelligence regarding a larger DTO associated with these subjects. The interceptions on this cell phone enabled investigators to determine the scope of involvement of the subject and identify other subjects that would have a more substantial impact on the DTO if intercepted and apprehended. The intercepted communications allowed investigators to further identify the sources of supply for narcotics entering the United States from Mexico and additional distribution points within Los Angeles. The wiretap was to help identify additional members within the organization, including a possible source of supply. Interception led to intelligence regarding a larger DTO associated with this subject. This interception has led to eight additional suspects. The investigation is ongoing. Phones used to conduct narcotics trafficking activities involving cocaine, methamphetamine, and marijuana. The investigation is ongoing. Wiretap provided crucial information into the trafficking habits and activities of the DTO as well as information on additional DTO members. No criminal charges resulted from the interceptions obtained to this intercept (wiretap) order. See 2014-LA-811. No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period. No pertinent interception made. Phone appeared to be inactive. Case is still active. 15 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Los Angeles (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-LA-848 163 1,792 11 89 2014-LA-849 60 571 18 82 2014-LA-850 59 3,224 2 98 2014-LA-851 63 5,324 84 16 2014-LA-852 36 2,869 59 41 2014-LA-853 70 4,898 5 95 2014-LA-854 1 0 0 100 2014-LA-855 69 2,928 10 90 2014-LA-856 25 0 0 100 2014-LA-857 133 28,323 7 93 2014-LA-858 279 24,677 10 90 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 Primary of target telephone identified, located, and arrested on federal indictment. Case is still active. Seizure of 7 kilograms of heroin and forfeiture of vehicle with man-made hidden compartments (Traps). Case is still active. Subject was involved in a conspiracy to commit murder. The investigation is ongoing and arrests are imminent. During the course of this wiretap investigators seized 34 pounds of methamphetamine and have identified numerous other subjects invovled in smuggling large amounts of cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin into the United States and the Los Angeles area. The intercepted communications allowed investigators to further identify the supplier of narcotics entering the United States from Mexico and subjects that were transporting narcotics from Mexico into Los Angeles area. Subject was involved in a conspiracy to commit murder and gang related activity. The wiretap assisted in solving the murder, investigation is ongoing, and arrests are imminent. Subject discontinued use of both phones before any law enforcement action could be taken. Based on wiretap intercepts, agents were able to ascertain the wire subject was sending bulk currency to Mexico. Agents were able to intercept and seize $28,178 in narcotic proceeds. Interceptions identified multiple cocaine and methamphetamine couriers. Cases have been submitted to the District Attorney's Office for filing. Subject was involved in a conspiracy to commit murder. The investigation is ongoing, and arrests are imminent. 16 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Los Angeles (contd) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 (%) 2014-LA-859 712 38,882 7 93 2014-LA-860 27 1,406 65 35 2014-LA-861 146 7,574 8 92 2014-LA-862 45 760 44 56 2014-LA-863 45 5,847 6 94 2014-LA-864 75 10,430 4 96 2014-LA-866 11 79 1 99 2014-LA-867 163 1,792 11 89 2014-LA-868 26 76 51 49 2014-LA-869 15 0 0 100 2014-LA-870 73 3,002 13 87 2014-LAS-7 205 2,700 38 62 2014-LA-871 85 2,394 3 97 Subject was involved in a conspiracy to commit murder and gang related activity. The wiretap assisted in solving the murder, investigation is ongoing, and arrests are imminent. Interceptions indentified a source of supply which led to an additional federal investigation. Subjects were involved in a conspiracy to commit murder. The wiretap assisted investigators in solving this murder investigation. Arrests are pending. No seizures have been made. With the help of the electronic interceptions, investigators are able to compile enough evidence to submit the case to the District Attorney's Office for filing. With the help of the electronic interceptions, investigators are able to compile enough evidence to submit the case to the District Attorney's Office for filing. Identified a Transnational Criminal Organization (TCO) and Targets of Influence (TOI) in Los Angeles County supplying narcotics to gangs in Southern and Central California. Primary subject identified, located, and arrested on unrelated federal indictment. Case is still active. Interceptions identified multiple cocaine and methamphetamine couriers and and an additional cellular phone used by the subject. The interceptions led to the arrest of five individuals and the seizures of 4 kilograms of cocaine, and $121,485 in narcotic proceeds. The investigation is ongoing. This was an emergency wiretap to prevent a possible murder. Identified a Transnational Criminal Organization (TCO) and Targets of Influence (TOI) in Los Angeles County supplying narcotics to gangs in Southern and Central California. No significant enforcement acitivity during this 30-day period. 17 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Los Angeles (cont’d) Madera EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 (%) 2014-LAS-8 113 5,058 76 24 2014-LA-872 0 862 27 73 2014-LA-873 11 445 9 91 2014-LA-874 12 181 1 99 2014-LA-876 92 5,463 7 93 2014-LA-877 75 3,905 4 96 2014-LA-878 25 500 11 89 2014-LA-879 274 8,583 6 94 2014-LA-880 46 7,819 29 71 2014-LA-881 1 4,941 99 1 2014-LA-883 42 226 35 65 2014-LA-884 55 1,437 18 82 Interceptions directly led to the arrest of three (3) individuals, the seizure of 5 pounds of methamphetamine, 1.5 kilograms of cocaine, $25,379 in narcotic proceeds, and two vehicles. This case is ongoing due to the arrest made of associates of the primary target. The subject is no longer using the phone. This was a beneficial interception period. Agents intercepted possible sources of methamphetamine and cocaine generating new leads in the investigation. The case is ongoing. No seizures were made based on the interceptions of TT#1. The subject did not utilize TT#1 after the initial interception of the Target Telephone. No arrests related to wiretap; case is still active. No arrests related to the wiretap; case is still active. Identified a Transnational Criminal Organization (TCO) and Targets of Influence (TOI) in Los Angeles County supplying narcotics to gangs in Southern and Central California. No arrests related to wiretap; case is still active. See 2014-LA-826. This wiretap was used to investigate an unsolved murder and other crimes committed by members of a violent criminal street gang. The information will assist in identifying the persons responsible for this crime. 2014-MAD-5 92 957 25 75 The intercept provided information regarding a drug trafficking organization transporting methamphetamine up from Mexico to distribute in Madera County. 2014-MAD-7 95 2,174 18 82 See 2014-MAD-7. 2014-MAD-8 37 282 27 73 See 2014-MAD-7. 2014-MAD-9 53 462 18 82 See 2014-MAD-7. 18 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Madera (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 2014-MAD-10 65 660 7 93 See 2014-MAD-7. 2014-MAD-12 58 442 24 76 See 2014-MAD-7. 2014-MAD-13 35 229 46 54 See 2014-MAD-7. 2014-MAD-15 21 205 22 78 See 2014-MAD-7. Merced 2014-MER-27 1,060 54,058 Napa 2014-NA-1 2 16 0 100 Orange 2014-OR-86 5 709 36 64 2014-OR-87 36 78 4 96 2014-OR-88 21 202 10 90 Placer 2014-PLA-3 39 493 31 69 Placer (cont’d) 2014-PLA-4 19 555 11 89 Riverside 2013-RIV-899 0 2013-RIV-902 0 2013-RIV-904 0 2013-RIV-905 0 This was a major operation targeting criminal street gang members and their associates in Merced County who were trafficking narcotics. This intercept was obtained to investigate a murder. No incriminating conversations were obtained, and after five days, the operation was shut down. The intercepts provided valuable assistance in developing probable cause to arrest two individuals for murder. These individuals have since been charged with the raping and murdering of four people. The interceptions resulted in the arrest of one individual for murder. The investigation is ongoing. The interceptions led to the arrest of one individual for murder. The investigation is ongoing. Wiretap was extremely useful and instrumental in solving a cold case homicide. The information on the wire corroborated other evidence and provided admissions to the homicide. Without the wiretap, this case would have remained unsolved. The wire also allowed us to pinpoint the suspects' location for easy apprehension once probable cause was established for an arrest warrant. This minimizing risk to law enforcement and others. Four defendants are in custody facing a murder charge. See 2014-PLA-4. 19 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2013-RIV-906 49 1,807 23 77 2013-RIV-911 11 163 1 99 2013-RIV-915 No significant events. 0 2013-RIV-916 23 617 21 79 2013-RIV-922 54 518 7 93 2013-RIV-925 36 3,006 8 92 20 80 2013-RIV-926 0 2013-RIV-927 0 2013-RIV-928 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 56 2013-RIV-929 4,534 As a result of this wiretap interception order, $19,100 in narcotic proceeds was seized. This wiretap interception order was used to help identify the user's source of supply. 0 2013-RIV-930 219 6,729 30 70 2013-RIV-931 178 13,786 3 97 2013-RIV-932 105 1,056 8 92 7 93 As a result of this wiretap interception, 46 pounds of methamphetamine and 11 kilograms of cocaine were seized. As a result of this wiretap interception order, $4 million in narcotic proceeds along with 22 kilograms of cocaine and 10 kilograms of heroin were seized. 2013-RIV-933 0 2013-RIV-934 0 2013-RIV-935 19 2013-RIV-936 302 0 2013-RIV-937 168 16,543 6 94 2013-RIV-938 282 5,848 5 95 2013-RIV-939 0 2013-RIV-940 77 3,612 25 75 2013-RIV-941 40 697 63 37 2013-RIV-942 21 564 7 93 This wiretap interception order led to an arrest of one individual and the seizure of 10 pounds of methamphetamine. 20 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2013-RIV-943 118 2,837 26 74 2013-RIV-944 87 832 28 72 2013-RIV-945 417 13,174 5 95 2013-RIV-946 123 10,206 17 83 2013-RIV-947 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 Traffic interdiction led to seizure of $3.7 million, which was hidden in interior gas tanks. Two were arrested and 1 kilogram of cocaine was also seized. During the investigation and wiretap interception, investigators learned about methods of operation, the drug trafficking organization (DTO) membership and stash locations associated with this DTO. As a result of this wiretap interception order, investigators were able to seize $17,000 in narcotic proceeds and a ½ pound of heroin. This wiretap investigation assisted in the identification of co-conspirators within the drug trafficking organization. 0 2013-RIV-948 8 1,370 4 96 2013-RIV-949 2 9 0 100 2013-RIV-950 4 102 5 95 2013-RIV-951 0 6 0 100 2013-RIV-952 118 1,360 17 83 2013-RIV-954 These subjects discontinued use of their phones during the interceptions; investigation is ongoing. The subjects discontinued use of their phones during this wiretap interception investigation. As a result of this wiretap interception order, $800,000 in narcotic proceeds was seized, as well as 22 kilograms of cocaine and 10 kilograms of heroin. 0 2013-RIV-955 0 2013-RIV-956 0 0 0 0 2014-RIV-957 269 2,763 5 95 2014-RIV-958 21 870 7 93 Target telephone intercepts led to the identification of the supply source. 2014-RIV-959 121 12,829 4 96 No results to report. 2014-RIV-960 16 728 14 86 21 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-RIV-961 99 1,851 9 91 2014-RIV-962 400 14,473 24 76 2014-RIV-963 194 5,932 40 60 2014-RIV-964 5 386 7 93 2014-RIV-965 249 1,326 5 95 2014-RIV-966 26 860 52 48 2014-RIV-967 28 3,939 7 93 2014-RIV-968 5 342 62 38 2014-RIV-969 87 2,918 15 85 2014-RIV-970 16 152 80 20 2014-RIV-971 39 5,313 25 75 2014-RIV-972 0 2014-RIV-973 0 2014-RIV-974 0 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 2014-RIV-975 59 35,720 22 78 2014-RIV-976 24 1,403 33 67 The following were seized as a result of this wiretap interception order: 5 kilograms of cocaine, 6 pounds of heroin, 6 pounds of methamphetamine, and $24,000 in narcotic proceeds. During this wiretap interception order, agents seized 2 kilograms of heroin and 14 firearms, and made one arrest. During this wiretap interception, agents identified additional drug trafficking organization members (DTO), stash locations, and methods of operation. Investigation is pending. Additional target telephones are currently being intercepted to further investigate this Mexico-based drug trafficking organization (DTO). Interceptions from this wiretap order resulted in identification of coconspirators to the DTO. As a result of this wiretap interception order, investigators were able to seize 54 kilograms of cocaine and made five arrests; investigation is ongoing and any prosecution is pending. Subject also discontinued use of phone during the interception. No significant events; investigation is ongoing. As a result of this wire interception, 43 kilograms of cocaine and $1,157,010 were seized. As a result of this wiretap interception order, agents seized 52 pounds of methamphetamine and $11,000. Three arrests are pending prosecution. 22 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 2014-RIV-977 94 3,009 12 88 As a result of this wire interception, 8.5 pounds of methamphetamine was seized. 2014-RIV-980 4 1,107 0 100 No significant events to report 2014-RIV-981 11 730 11 89 2014-RIV-982 7 1,042 3 97 2014-RIV-983 61 2,239 17 83 2014-RIV-984 18 1,220 15 85 2014-RIV-985 46 450 2014-RIV-986 0 2014-RIV-987 0 2014-RIV-988 0 As a result of this wire interception, $133,500 in narcotic proceeds was seized. 77 23 As a result of this wiretap interception order, agents were able to identify the customer base as well as a Mexico-based narcotics cell head. Interceptions assisted in locating and identifying a second subject and telephone numbers of couriers. No significant events to report. 2014-RIV-989 32 253 43 57 2014-RIV-990 67 1,793 20 80 2014-RIV-991 161 5,814 15 85 2014-RIV-992 59 2,752 5 95 2014-RIV-993 217 7,388 10 90 2014-RIV-994 17 6,255 65 35 2014-RIV-995 17 396 32 68 This interception order assisted law enforcement agents to learn the identity and roles of other coconspirators and the hierarchy of the drug trafficking organization. As a result of this wire interception order, two subjects were arrested, and 1.5 pounds of cocaine and $21,810 in narcotic proceeds were seized. As a result of this wire interception, 9.8 kilograms of cocaine was seized. Based off of this wiretap interception order, it was found that the primary user of the phone was going to facilitate a shipment of narcotics from Mexico to U.S. However, the intercept expired prior to receiving any further details of the narcotic transition. 23 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-RIV-996 19 379 52 48 2013-RIV-997 47 499 24 76 2014-RIV-998 16 194 3 97 2014-RIV-999 736 21,326 14 86 11 89 2014-RIV-1000 2014-RIV-1001 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 No significant events to report; investigation is ongoing. 0 37 2,031 2014-RIV-1002 0 2014-RIV-1003 0 2014-RIV-1004 0 1 0 100 No significant events to report. 2014-RIV-1005 56 2,619 8 92 As a result of this wire interception, 6 pounds of methamphetamine was seized. 2014-RIV-1006 40 503 18 82 2014-RIV-1007 18 706 7 93 2014-RIV-1008 62 1,376 33 67 2014-RIV-1009 5,266 6,028 5 95 2014-RIV-1010 15 203 15 85 2014-RIV-1011 65 718 18 82 2014-RIV-1012 47 2014-RIV-1013 2014-RIV-1014 935 27 73 0 100 No seizures to report. No significant events occurred over the 30 days of interception. Information from this wire led to further surveillance and investigative actions which resulted in the seizure of 72 kilograms of cocaine from another target. During the interception, investigators seized 55 pounds of methamphetamine, 20 kilograms of heroin, and $21,900 in narcotic proceeds. 0 1 11 2014-RIV-1016 0 2014-RIV-1017 0 Installed - but not used. 2014-RIV-1018 81 3,763 17 83 2014-RIV-1019 8 59 22 77 During the wiretap interception, investigators were able to seize $45,000 in narcotic proceeds. 24 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. 2014-RIV-1020 Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted 22 2014-RIV-1021 Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications 178 (%) (%) 41 59 As a result of this wiretap interception order, agents were able to seize 13 kilograms of cocaine and made one arrest. 0 2014-RIV-1022 46 4,135 28 72 2014-RIV-1023 15 412 17 83 2014-RIV-1024 102 1,563 5 95 2014-RIV-1025 4 211 20 80 2014-RIV-1026 0 1 0 100 2014-RIV-1027 19 410 80 20 2014-RIV-1028 1 118 0 100 2014-RIV-1029 35 2,851 11 89 2014-RIV-1030 163 2,509 38 62 2014-RIV-1031 139 3,522 12 88 2014-RIV-1032 3 374 6 94 2014-RIV-1033 108 1,268 19 81 2014-RIV-1034 30 183 40 60 2014-RIV-1035 2014-RIV-1036 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 During this wiretap intercept investigation, three individuals were arrested, 1 vehicle, 5 pounds of methamphetamine, and $76,000 in narcotic proceeds were seized. The wiretap interception order led to the seizure of 5 pounds of heroin, and the identification of other coconspirators. The wiretap interception order was essential in identifying and disrupting the drug trafficking organization (DTO). Furthermore, agents are able to dismantle the structure of this DTO. Installed - but not used. As a result of this wire interception, 5,000 pounds of marijuana was seized from the drug trafficking organization (DTO). This subject discontinued the use of cell phone. As a result of this wire interception, 138 kilgrams of cocaine was seized from within exterior reservoir fuel tanks, two people were arrested, and the truck was seized. As a result of this wire interception, 18 pounds of heroin was seized and made one arrest. During this investigation, agents seized $500,000 in narcotic proceeds and made one arrest. 0 49 960 33 67 As a result of this wire interception, two persons arrested, and 10 pounds of methamphetamine seized. 25 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-RIV-1037 35 471 15 85 2014-RIV-1039 38 1,402 14 86 2014-RIV-1040 0 18 0 100 2014-RIV-1041 As a result of this wire interception, four arrests made and 6 pounds of methamphetamine seized. During this wiretap interception order, agents identified further coconspirators within the DTO along with locations of stash houses and methods of operation. 0 2014-RIV-1042 27 83 16 84 2014-RIV-1043 37 986 64 36 2014-RIV-1044 Federally Funded - No significant events. This particular wiretap interception order led to seizures of 90 grams of cocaine, 479 grams of marijuana, and 5 grams of methamphetamine. A search warrant served out-of-state also uncovered and closed a drug stash house. 0 2014-RIV-1045 91 8,273 20 80 2013-RIV-1046 98 2,020 5 95 2014-RIV-1047 1 1 0 100 2014-RIV-1048 15 163 25 75 2014-RIV-1049 36 59,257 39 61 2014-RIV-1050 79 3,489 30 70 2014-RIV-1051 4 490 10 90 2014-RIV-1052 47 2,242 16 84 2014-RIV-1053 129 4,619 18 82 2014-RIV-1054 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 326 2,409 21 79 As a result of this wire interception, 17 pounds of methamphetamine and 5 pounds of heroin were seized. As a result of this wire interception, 160 pounds of methamphetamine, 200 gallons of liquid methamphetamine, and $850,000 in narcotic proceeds were seized. Intercepts provided additional information regarding narcotics customers and structure of the drug trafficking organization (DTO). As a result of this wire interception, seizures included 7.7 kilograms of heroin (China White), 20.79 kilograms of cocaine, and 8.55 kilograms of methamphetamine. This target telephone was terminated after 30 days. Agents seized $6 million in narcotic proceeds and made three arrests. Interceptions also led to the identification of others within the DTO. 26 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) 2014-RIV-1055 0 2014-RIV-1056 0 2014-RIV-1057 0 (%) 2014-RIV-1058 65 1,134 26 74 2014-RIV-1059 81 9,023 1 99 2014-RIV-1060 5 48 58 42 2014-RIV-1061 25 1,479 2014-RIV-1062 0 2014-RIV-1063 0 4 96 2014-RIV-1064 22 7,745 23 77 2014-RIV-1065 18 940 9 91 2014-RIV-1067 25 4,683 3 97 2014-RIV-1068 50 1,054 18 82 2014-RIV-1066 During the course of this wiretap, the primary user of the intercepted telephone was arrested on narcotics charges relating to the seizure of 4.3 kilograms of cocaine, 2.8 kilograms of heroin, 13.1 kilograms of crystal methamphetamine. As a result of this wiretap interception, 22 pounds of methamphetamine was seized, and one arrest made. 0 2014-RIV-1071 78 1,334 10 90 2014-RIV-1072 0 0 0 100 1 100 2014-RIV-1073 0 2014-RIV-1074 0 0 2014-RIV-1076 2014-RIV-1078 As a result of this wiretap interception, 11 kilograms of cocaine and 5 pounds of methamphetamine were seized. No criminal charges resulted from this wiretap interception order. 0 2014-RIV-1070 2014-RIV-1075 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 0 Cell phone interception ceased due to line being dropped by target user. 0 77 6,029 23 77 As a result of this wiretap interception order, 20 pounds of methamphetamine was seized and four arrests were made. The case is ongoing. 27 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted 2014-RIV-1079 Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 0 2014-RIV-1080 0 5 0 100 2013-RIV-1081 57 2,770 16 84 2014-RIV-1082 0 2014-RIV-1083 0 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized 50 pounds of methamphetamine. 2014-RIV-1084 10 2,058 11 89 2014-RIV-1085 298 21,486 15 85 2014-RIV-1086 77 3,654 14 86 2014-RIV-1087 4 881 5 95 2014-RIV-1088 118 9,769 7 93 2014-RIV-1089 103 3,882 5 95 2014-RIV-1090 320 2,063 5 95 2014-RIV-1091 24 23,278 10 90 See 2014-RIV-1049. 2014-RIV-1092 156 12,062 12 88 No results to report; investigation is ongoing. 2014-RIV-1093 17 1,658 20 80 2014-RIV-1094 10 628 18 82 2014-RIV-1095 133 5,091 1 99 2014-RIV-1096 2,990 5,973 73 27 2014-RIV-1097 180 20,984 9 91 2014-RIV-1098 536 8,102 10 90 2014-RIV-1099 As a result of this wiretap interception order, 5 kilograms of heroin and $346,000 were seized. This wiretap interception order provided further intelligence to federal counterparts in South America concerning a large scale cocaine smuggling organization. 0 2014-RIV-1100 7 50 62 38 2014-RIV-1101 228 6,632 22 78 2014-RIV-1102 95 1,903 10 90 2014-RIV-1103 50 1,980 15 85 As a result of this wiretap interception order, agents seized $620,000 in narcotic proceeds. As a result of this wiretap interception order, 10 pounds of heroin was seized and one person was arrested. 28 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-RIV-1104 50 1,893 6 94 2014-RIV-1106 214 10,896 5 95 2014-RIV-1108 33 1,224 14 86 2014-RIV-1109 Based on intercepted calls, three suspects were arrested and 1 kilogram of cocaine and 1 stolen gun were seized. 0 2014-RIV-1110 591 14,781 4 96 2014-RIV-1111 61 4,295 7 93 2014-RIV-1112 184 4,025 13 87 2014-RIV-1113 55 722 61 39 2014-RIV-1114 2 8 0 100 2014-RIV-1115 18 2,795 38 62 2014-RIV-1116 68 2,343 44 56 2014-RIV-1117 89 3,978 1 99 2014-RIV-1118 24 1,414 2 98 7 93 2014-RIV-1119 2014-RIV-1120 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 As a result of this wiretap interception order, 21.3 kilograms of cocaine and $161,400 were seized. As a result of this wiretap interception order, officers were able to seize 5 pounds of methamphetamine. As a result of this wire interception, $11,780 was seized along with 60 grams of methamphetamine. As a result of this wire interception, 25 pounds of methamphetamine was seized. 0 15 2014-RIV-1121 5,667 0 2014-RIV-1122 128 3,535 2 98 2014-RIV-1123 86 2,721 10 90 2014-RIV-1124 1 5 60 40 2014-RIV-1125 24 449 35 65 2014-RIV-1127 83 5,736 17 83 2014-RIV-1128 30 1,057 42 58 As a result of this wiretap interception order, agents seized $283,555 in narcotic proceeds. Three people were arrested as a result of this wiretap interception order, and 12 pounds of methamphetamine was seized. As a result of this wire interception, seizures included 1 kilogram of cocaine and 1 stolen gun. 29 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-RIV-1129 17 619 8 92 2014-RIV-1130 151 2,729 16 84 2014-RIV-1131 43 6,592 35 65 2013-RIV-1132 4 749 20 80 2014-RIV-1133 68 3,614 25 75 2013-RIV-1135 18 4,751 13 87 2014-RIV-1136 92 5,336 12 76 6 94 2014-RIV-1137 As a result of this wire interception, $418,790 was seized. As a result of this wire interception, $35,492 was seized from subjects traveling through multiple states collecting narcotic proceeds. 0 35 2014-RIV-1139 2,066 0 2014-RIV-1141 178 5,866 35 65 2014-RIV-1142 332 528 17 83 2014-RIV-1143 11 74 43 57 2014-RIV-1144 2014-RIV-1145 Interceptions corroborated information on target but illegal activity was infrequent; no drugs or money seized under this wiretap order. 0 2014-RIV-1134 2014-RIV-1138 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 As a result of this wire interception, 4 pounds of methamphetamine was seized and two arrests were made. 0 54 2014-RIV-1146 3,543 0 2014-RIV-1148 106 6,093 9 91 2014-RIV-1149 20 274 20 80 2014-RIV-1150 56 4,871 6 94 As a result of this wire interception, 33 kilograms of cocaine, 5 kilograms of heroin, and 7 pounds of methamphetamine were seized. As a result of this wire interception, 11 pounds of heroin and $346,020 were seized. 30 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-RIV-1151 29 1,251 21 79 2014-RIV-1152 0 0 0 0 2014-RIV-1153 48 1,541 78 22 2014-RIV-1154 199 7,075 24 76 2014-RIV-1155 93 1,786 16 84 2014-RIV-1157 0 29 0 100 2014-RIV-1158 44 944 9 91 2014-RIV-1160 32 300 6 94 2014-RIV-1161 0 4 0 0 2014-RIV-1162 51 2,895 4 96 2014-RIV-1163 0 7 0 100 2014-RIV-1164 39 1,696 3 97 2014-RIV-1165 71 2,231 28 72 2014-RIV-1166 4 87 3 97 2014-RIV-1167 116 4,475 22 78 2014-RIV-1168 2014-RIV-1170 A retail dealer was identified as a result of this wiretap interception order. Surveillance was conducted at the residence and a search warrant was also served, 100 grams of methamphetamine, 2 firearms (1 stolen), and 9 pounds of marijuana and marijuana wax were located. Four subjects were arrested and are pending prosecution No calls were intercepted. 0 2014-RIV-1156 2014-RIV-1169 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized 30 pounds of methamphetamine. No arrests or seizures were made due to the brevity of this wiretap interception; agents were only able to monitor minimal phone activity. As a result of this wire interception, agents seized $109,980 from a drug trafficking organization (DTO) courier. This wiretap interception order led to the arrest of two suspects and the seizure of $56,000 in narcotic proceeds and 5 pounds of marijuana. 0 3 101 19 81 Additional target telephones are currently being intercepted to further this investigation into drug trafficking organization (DTO). See also 2014RIV-1049. 0 31 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. 2014-RIV-1171 Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted 87 Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications 999 (%) (%) 40 60 2014-RIV-1172 32 2,934 11 89 2014-RIV-1173 1 1 0 100 2014-RIV-1174 71 1,887 15 85 2014-RIV-1175 426 4,660 30 70 2013-RIV-1177 49 4,309 8 92 2014-RIV-1178 32 4,395 6 94 2014-RIV-1179 273 9,418 15 85 12 88 8 92 2014-RIV-1180 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized 11 pounds of heroin. 0 9 2014-RIV-1182 2014-RIV-1183 As a result of this wire interception, one arrest was made, and 10 pounds of methamphetamine was seized. 0 2014-RIV-1176 2014-RIV-1181 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 1,068 0 149 2014-RIV-1184 2,037 0 This wiretap interception order led to the seizure of 11 kilograms of cocaine and 21 pounds of methamphetamine. As a result of this wire interception, $208,300 in narcotic proceeds was seized. As a result of this wire interception, numerous intercepted calls proved the subject was directly involved in the DTO and 5 pounds of heroin was seized. 2014-RIV-1185 30 220 22 78 2014-RIV-1186 41 931 19 81 2014-RIV-1187 110 4,353 5 95 2014-RIV-1188 17 26,917 3 97 See 2014-RIV-1049. As a result of this wire interception, $70,000 in narcotic proceeds, 10 – 1 ounce gold bars, and one vehicle were seized. 2014-RIV-1190 813 10,700 8 92 2014-RIV-1191 30 763 15 85 2014-RIV-1192 0 7 0 0 2014-RIV-1193 108 4,305 26 74 This wiretap interception order led to the arrest of one person along with the seizure of 343 grams of methamphetamine. 32 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-RIV-1194 87 5,076 55 45 2014-RIV-1195 0 0 0 0 2014-RIV-1196 54 8,672 5 95 2014-RIV-1197 64 1,406 7 93 2014-RIV-1198 67 8,787 60 40 2014-RIV-1199 15 10,282 26 74 2014-RIV-1200 Installed but not used - target telephone accounts were closed for non-payment. 0 2014-RIV-1201 82 3,583 27 73 2014-RIV-1202 100 2,519 15 85 2014-RIV-1203 0 0 0 0 2014-RIV-1204 As a result of this wire interception, numerous calls involving narcotic related trafficking were intercepted, and 1 pound of methamphetamine and $25,500 in narcotic proceeds were seized. 0 2014-RIV-1205 14 3,867 1 99 2014-RIV-1206 97 4,813 15 85 2014-RIV-1207 152 3,254 4 96 2014-RIV-1208 132 12,802 19 81 2014-RIV-1209 53 1,051 35 65 2014-RIV-1210 0 42 0 100 2014-RIV-1211 31 1,391 49 51 2014-RIV-1212 15 251 82 18 2014-RIV-1213 113 1,348 47 53 2014-RIV-1214 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 38 29,138 42 58 As a result of this wire interception, 29 pounds of heroin and $20,000 in narcotic proceeds were seized. As a result of this wire interception, 10 kilograms of cocaine and 4 pounds of heroin were seized. This wiretap interception order resulted in the seizure of undisclosed amount of narcotics and additional intelligence which will be utilized in disrupting the drug trafficking organization (DTO). 33 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-RIV-1215 84 10,581 12 88 2014-RIV-1216 101 5,435 10 90 2014-RIV-1217 141 323 13 87 2014-RIV-1218 83 3,878 62 24 2014-RIV-1219 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 As a result of this wire interception, 300 pounds of marijuana in a stash house was seized, four suspects were arrested and new subjects and DTOs were identified. This wiretap interception order assisted detectives in further identification of subjects involved in murder and gang activity. 0 2014-RIV-1220 490 13,486 17 83 2014-RIV-1221 55 139 33 67 2014-RIV-1222 2 1,121 23 77 2014-RIV-1223 As a result of this wire interception, $2,245,661 in narcotic proceeds was seized. 0 2014-RIV-1224 105 3,913 2 98 2014-RIV-1225 5 102 16 84 2014-RIV-1226 471 2,115 12 88 2014-RIV-1227 0 2014-RIV-1229 48 6,501 11 89 2014-RIV-1231 189 6,500 17 83 2014-RIV-1232 14 100 25 75 2014-RIV-1233 149 5,406 3 97 2014-RIV-1234 As a result of this wire interception, one arrest was made and 1 pound of methamphetamine was seized. As a result of this wire interception, $20,000 in narcotic proceeds, 5.6 ounces of cocaine, and 2 firearms were seized. 0 2014-RIV-1235 35 1,056 24 76 2014-RIV-1236 103 11,218 8 92 2014-RIV-1237 8 1,936 11 89 2014-RIV-1238 2 4,637 0 100 As a result of this wire interception, 20 kilograms of cocaine,11 pounds of heroin, 5 pounds of methamphetamine, and $39,000 in narcotic proceeds were seized. As a result of this wire interception, one arrest was made, and 25 kilograms of cocaine was seized. 34 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. 2014-RIV-1239 Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted 53 Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications 7,139 (%) (%) 4 96 2014-RIV-1240 289 5,127 8 92 2014-RIV-1241 100 26,480 17 83 2014-RIV-1242 As a result of this wire interception, one arrest was made and 12.5 pounds of methamphetamine and 244 pounds of marijuana were seized. 0 2014-RIV-1243 174 3,252 13 87 2014-RIV-1244 111 5,119 7 93 2014-RIV-1245 6 223 80 20 30 70 2014-RIV-1246 2014-RIV-1247 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 0 6 2014-RIV-1248 80 0 2014-RIV-1249 107 2,392 22 78 2014-RIV-1250 51 1,693 7 93 2014-RIV-1251 35 2,048 25 75 2014-RIV-1252 59 255 16 84 2014-RIV-1253 8 32 34 66 2014-RIV-1254 617 3,452 10 90 2014-RIV-1255 8 38 58 42 2014-RIV-1256 496 9,946 18 82 2014-RIV-1257 15 545 7 93 2014-RIV-1258 0 2014-RIV-1259 0 2014-RIV-1260 0 2014-RIV-1261 22 1,608 10 90 2014-RIV-1262 122 2,153 7 93 2014-RIV-1263 41 24,031 42 58 As a result of this wire interception, $100,000 in narcotic proceeds was seized. As a result of this wire interception, $180,000 in narcotic proceeds and 12 pounds of heroin were seized. As a result of this wire interception, agents were able to further identify all suspects and subjects involved in the murder with additional gang affiliation admissions. See 2014-RIV-1049. 35 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications 2014-RIV-1264 0 2014-RIV-1265 0 2014-RIV-1266 67 2014-RIV-1267 2,115 (%) (%) 17 83 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 0 2014-RIV-1268 26 2,357 30 70 2014-RIV-1269 108 7,818 13 87 2014-RIV-1270 19 2,065 15 85 2014-RIV-1271 0 4 0 100 2014-RIV-1272 31 3,719 15 85 2014-RIV-1273 As a result of this wire interception, 18 kilograms of cocaine and 16 kilograms of heroin were seized. 0 2014-RIV-1275 37 5,273 12 88 2014-RIV-1276 89 3,392 21 79 2014-RIV-1277 305 18,395 15 85 2014-RIV-1278 103 4,195 13 87 2014-RIV-1280 As a result of this wire interception, numerous narcotic trafficking related calls were intercepted, two search warrants were served and $20,741 in suspected drug proceeds was seized along with 2 firearms and 5.6 ounces of cocaine. One person was arrested on drug trafficking related charges. 0 2014-RIV-1281 34 534 37 63 2014-RIV-1282 0 0 0 100 2014-RIV-1283 59 2,591 10 90 2014-RIV-1284 11 5,155 10 90 2014-RIV-1285 205 4,153 11 89 2014-RIV-1286 0 2014-RIV-1287 18 220 80 20 2014-RIV-1288 113 219 38 62 This wiretap interception order led to the seizure of 7 pounds of methamphetamine and the arrest of two subjects. 36 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-RIV-1289 315 4,027 28 72 2014-RIV-1290 163 7,741 45 55 2014-RIV-1291 0 0 4 96 2014-RIV-1292 2014-RIV-1293 9 276 65 7,534 37 63 2014-RIV-1296 1 10 10 90 2014-RIV-1297 13 77 32 68 2014-RIV-1298 79 2,781 11 89 2014-RIV-1299 9 86 86 14 102 2014-RIV-1301 1,372 17 83 As a result of this wiretap interception, a search warrant was subsequently served. Methamphetamine and heroin were seized and the subject was arrested and released pending further investigation and prosecution. 0 2014-RIV-1302 156 7,227 30 70 2014-RIV-1303 9 703 25 75 2014-RIV-1304 0 2014-RIV-1305 48 496 36 64 2014-RIV-1306 1 2 0 100 2014-RIV-1307 12 362 7 93 46 54 10 90 2014-RIV-1308 0 42 15,964 2014-RIV-1310 0 2014-RIV-1311 0 2014-RIV-1312 0 2014-RIV-1313 Interceptions from this wiretap order resulted in the seizure of $20,000 in narcotic proceeds. 0 2013-RIV-1295 2014-RIV-1309 As a result of this wire interception, agents were able to seize $1.16 million in narcotic proceeds. As a result of this wire interception, $71,879 and 2 kilograms of cocaine were seized and two arrests were made. Installed but not used, no calls were intercepted. 0 2014-RIV-1294 2014-RIV-1300 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 18 132 See 2014-RIV-1049. 37 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. 2014-RIV-1315 Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted 24 Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications 1,466 (%) (%) 32 68 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 As a result of this wire interception, additional subjects and the drug trafficking organization’s structure were identified. As a result of this wire interception, $1.2 million in narcotic proceeds, 5 vehicles, and gold valued at $79,650 were seized. 2014-RIV-1316 67 8,468 40 60 2014-RIV-1317 655 2,921 17 83 2014-RIV-1319 11 1,464 1 99 2014-RIV-1320 142 3,283 15 85 As a result of this wire interception, 21.74 grams of methamphetamine was seized. 2014-RIV-1321 0 0 2014-RIV-1322 196 8,264 5 95 As a result of this wire interception, communications assisted with surveillance operations and led to narcotic seizures and arrests. 81 As a result of this wire interception, two arrests were made and the seizure of 2.5 pounds of methamphetamine, 2 pounds of cocaine, $46,400 in narcotic proceeds, and 6 guns. 2014-RIV-1323 2014-RIV-1324 0 156 2014-RIV-1326 2014-RIV-1327 4,279 19 0 0 2014-RIV-1328 Installed but not used, subject dumped phone. 0 0 2014-RIV-1329 209 7,576 15 85 2014-RIV-1330 73 1,096 16 84 2014-RIV-1332 560 3,707 5 95 2014-RIV-1333 0 11 0 100 2014-RIV-1334 5 2,023 7 93 2014-RIV-1331 0 2014-RIV-1335 As a result of this wire interception, $210,698 in narcotic proceeds and 8 firearms were seized. 0 2014-RIV-1336 48 3,585 30 70 2014-RIV-1337 22 103 52 48 38 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized 26 pounds of methamphetamine and 3 kilograms of cocaine. This wiretap interception order was necessary to investigate a Mexicobased drug trafficking organization (DTO). Intel was gained for a future enforcement action which will disrupt the DTO. As a result of this wire interception, three people were arrested and 86 pounds of methamphetamine was seized. 2014-RIV-1338 33 2,470 12 88 2014-RIV-1339 115 3,365 7 93 2014-RIV-1340 23 2,679 14 86 2014-RIV-1341 30 444 54 46 2014-RIV-1342 18 512 30 70 Additional subjects and DTO were identified; no arrests or seizures were made. 2014-RIV-1343 142 3,283 15 85 See 2014-RIV-1320. 2014-RIV-1344 78 23,191 20 80 2014-RIV-1345 113 82,272 9 91 2014-RIV-1346 37 976 26 74 As a result of this wire interception, 1 pound of marijuana and $36,805 in narcotic proceeds were seized. 53 47 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized 908 grams of methamphetamine and 136 grams of marijuana. 2014-RIV-1347 2014-RIV-1348 0 62 1,378 2014-RIV-1349 0 2014-RIV-1350 0 2014-RIV-1351 109 1,944 18 82 2014-RIV-1352 7 116 49 51 2014-RIV-1353 102 4,156 14 86 2014-RIV-1354 37 2,988 8 92 As a result of this wire interception, 5.6 pounds of methamphetamine and $101,095 were seized. One subject was arrested. See 2014-RIV-1320. 2014-RIV-1355 0 2014-RIV-1356 0 2014-RIV-1357 8 556 34 66 2014-RIV-1358 10 119 51 49 As a result of this wire interception, $160,012 in narcotic proceeds was seized. 39 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-RIV-1359 2 3 0 100 2014-RIV-1360 113 2,573 60 40 2014-RIV-1361 23 204 7 93 2014-RIV-1362 159 1,753 27 73 2014-RIV-1363 200 8,847 5 95 2014-RIV-1364 611 35,139 20 80 2014-RIV-1365 143 2,437 12 88 2014-RIV-1366 260 6,163 15 85 2014-RIV-1367 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 This target telephone was used sparingly; no incriminating interceptions. As a result of this wiretap interception order, $221,000 in narcotic proceeds was seized. As a result of this wire interception, agents were able to seize $300,000 in narcotic proceeds. As a result of this wire interception, $505,880, $42,100, $60,000 and $25,000 in narcotic proceeds were seized at various locations. As a result of this wire interception, numerous calls involving narcotics trafficking were discussed at length and 27.7 pounds of methamphetamine, 3 pounds of black tar heroin, 2 firearms, and $7,791 in suspected drug proceeds were seized from residences and traffic stops. 0 2014-RIV-1368 65 4,075 25 75 2014-RIV-1369 238 3,324 7 93 2014-RIV-1370 28 3,464 27 73 2014-RIV-1371 100 1,996 2014-RIV-1372 18 553 33 67 2014-RIV-1373 379 10,693 20 80 2014-RIV-1374 39 41,344 37 63 2014-RIV-1375 12 352 14 86 2014-RIV-1376 711 4,967 20 80 Information derived from this wiretap interception order resulted in two arrests and the seizure of 5 pounds of methamphetamine. As a result of this wire interception, agents were able to further identify additional cocaine and methamphetamine couriers associated with the drug trafficking organization (DTO). 40 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-RIV-1377 50 4,775 33 67 2014-RIV-1378 0 0 0 100 2014-RIV-1379 16 305 40 60 2014-RIV-1380 4 698 23 77 2014-RIV-1381 0 1 0 100 2014-RIV-1382 0 17 2014-RIV-1383 7 1,536 20 80 2014-RIV-1384 0 2014-RIV-1385 0 2014-RIV-1386 10 193 27 73 2014-RIV-1387 214 4,147 14 86 2014-RIV-1388 54 3,494 48 52 2014-RIV-1389 The interception order assisted agents in further identifying the structure of the DTO. As a result of this wire interception, $36,805 and 2 pounds of marijuana were seized. Information derived from this wiretap interception order resulted in three arrests and the seizure of 7 kilograms of heroin and 4 kilograms of cocaine. 0 2014-RIV-1390 75 1,073 43 57 2014-RIV-1392 0 2 0 100 2014-RIV-1393 44 904 16 84 23 77 2014-RIV-1394 2014-RIV-1395 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 0 45 2014-RIV-1396 2,501 0 The subject discontinued using this phone. 2014-RIV-1398 24 516 15 85 2014-RIV-1399 55 3,482 7 93 2014-RIV-1400 27 4,942 4 96 The subject discontinued using this phone. 25 75 Intercepted communications resulted in the seizure of 31 pounds of methamphetamine and one arrest. 2014-RIV-1401 0 2014-RIV-1402 0 2014-RIV-1403 105 3,175 41 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted 2014-RIV-1404 Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 0 2014-RIV-1405 126 924 40 60 2014-RIV-1406 554 9,504 13 87 2014-RIV-1407 9 649 30 70 2014-RIV-1408 36 15,486 22 78 2014-RIV-1409 0 0 0 100 2014-RIV-1410 32 2,015 22 78 2014-RIV-1411 105 3,232 40 60 2014-RIV-1412 2 20 20 80 2014-RIV-1413 15 3,661 27 73 2014-RIV-1414 66 924 30 70 2014-RIV-1415 7 248 40 60 2014-RIV-1416 As a result of this wire interception, narcotic proceeds were seized at various locations in the amounts of: $70,000; $170,000; $180,000; and $1.4 million. As a result of this wire interception, agents seized $22,433 in narcotic proceeds. As a result of this wire interception, investigators identified other associates and stash residences. The interception also led to the seizure of 4 kilograms of cocaine and 5 pounds of methamphetamine. 0 2014-RIV-1417 86 3,246 15 85 2014-RIV-1418 32 2,346 15 85 52 48 2014-RIV-1419 0 2014-RIV-1420 0 2014-RIV-1421 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 109 2014-RIV-1423 1,090 The interception led to the arrest and seizure of 4 pounds of methamphetamine. 0 2014-RIV-1424 37 738 22 78 2014-RIV-1425 7 1,197 52 48 Interceptions from this wiretap order led to the arrest of two individuals and the seizure of 2 compartmented vehicles. 42 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-RIV-1426 27 21,267 74 26 2014-RIV-1427 222 1,425 13 87 2014-RIV-1428 35 2,781 12 88 2014-RIV-1429 11 458 81 19 2014-RIV-1430 0 2014-RIV-1431 0 2014-RIV-1432 159 2,983 22 78 2014-RIV-1433 17 465 1 99 2014-RIV-1434 3 6 33 67 2014-RIV-1435 0 0 2014-RIV-1436 156 8,261 44 56 2014-RIV-1437 28 3,112 2 98 2014-RIV-1438 7 428 8 92 2014-RIV-1439 29 2,354 15 85 2014-RIV-1440 124 72,602 30 70 2014-RIV-1441 23 980 18 82 2014-RIV-1442 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized 26.2 kilograms of heroin, 464.18 kilograms of cocaine, 8.55 kilograms of methamphetamine, and $507,680 in narcotic proceeds. As a result of this wire interception, $122,000 in narcotic proceeds was seized from a residence. This wiretap interception order led to the seizure of $750,000 in narcotic proceeds and 6 kilograms of heroin. 0 2014-RIV-1443 0 0 0 0 2014-RIV-1444 16 1,710 1 99 2014-RIV-1445 2 2 2 98 2014-RIV-1446 14 1,901 16 84 2014-RIV-1447 10 614 60 40 2014-RIV-1449 70 777 21 79 2014-RIV-1451 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 Phone was discarded by subject. As a result of this wire interception, , $152,823 in narcotic proceeds was seized. As a result of this wire interception, three people were arrested, and $176,493 in narcotic proceeds and 6 kilograms of cocaine were seized. As a result of this wire interception, 13 pounds of methamphetamine was seized. 0 43 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-RIV-1452 23 549 1 99 2014-RIV-1453 2 1 0 100 2014-RIV-1455 540 3,801 17 83 2014-RIV-1456 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized $485,893 in narcotic proceeds. 0 2014-RIV-1457 30 603 33 67 2014-RIV-1458 61 1,313 32 68 2014-RIV-1459 137 3,475 10 90 2014-RIV-1460 56 977 5 95 2014-RIV-1461 7 1,416 3 97 2014-RIV-1463 7 875 34 66 2014-RIV-1464 10 2,280 13 87 2014-RIV-1466 107 5,674 8 92 2014-RIV-1467 115 3,115 6 94 2014-RIV-1468 38 2,867 9 91 2014-RIV-1470 70 1,665 19 81 2014-RIV-1471 79 1,710 11 89 8 92 2014-RIV-1472 0 2014-RIV-1473 0 2014-RIV-1474 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 78 3,869 Interceptions led to the identification and authoring of wiretap affidavits for multiple other individuals associated with the drug trafficking organization. As a result of this wire interception, 2 kilograms of cocaine was seized. As a result of this wire interception, $320,000 in narcotic proceeds was seized. This wiretap led to more intercepts which resulted in multiple seizures of narcotics and money from narcotics proceeds. As a result of this wire interception, agents seized $382,000 in narcotic proceeds. As a result of this wire interception, two people were arrested, and $152,823 in narcotic proceeds was seized. The listed subject discontinued using the target telephone. As a result of a seizure, agents seized 5 kilograms of cocaine along with 2 vehicles, and four people were arrested on drug charges. This interception led to the seizure of one handgun. This wiretap interception order led to the identification of two sources of supply, customers, and couriers operating within the drug trafficking organization. 44 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. 2014-RIV-1475 Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted 0 Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications 18 (%) (%) 0 100 2014-RIV-1476 9 381 40 60 2014-RIV-1477 1 43 9 91 2014-RIV-1478 0 2014-RIV-1479 0 As a result of this wire interception, three people were arrested, and 8 pounds of methamphetamine was seized. This intercept was not installed. 2014-RIV-1480 41 3,100 56 44 2014-RIV-1481 29 3,943 4 96 2014-RIV-1482 1 59 0 100 2014-RIV-1483 39 8,253 5 95 2013-RIV-1484 39 2,272 5 95 2014-RIV-1485 327 6,089 33 67 2014-RIV-1486 28 55,328 46 54 2014-RIV-1487 134 22,459 9 91 2014-RIV-1488 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 This wiretap interception led to the seizure of 14 pounds of methamphetamine and a handgun, and one person was arrested. As a result of this wire interception, 26.2 kilograms of heroin, 474.24 kilograms of cocaine, 8.55 kilograms of methamphetamine and $507,680 in narcotic proceeds were seized. As a result of this wire interception, 46 kilograms of cocaine and one vehicle were seized, and one person was arrested. 0 2014-RIV-1489 67 2,371 35 65 2014-RIV-1490 32 3,288 16 84 2014-RIV-1491 0 2014-RIV-1492 7 4,236 27 73 2014-RIV-1493 84 1,961 15 85 2014-RIV-1494 36 848 23 77 2014-RIV-1495 44 3,567 9 91 2014-RIV-1496 0 2014-RIV-1497 0 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized $100,000 in narcotic proceeds. 45 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 2014-RIV-1498 40 993 30 70 Interceptions led to the seizure of $279,850 in narcotic proceeds. 2014-RIV-1499 116 3,746 9 91 As a result of this wire interception, $60,500 in suspected narcotic proceeds was seized. 25 75 2014-RIV-1500 2014-RIV-1501 0 86 2014-RIV-1502 6,816 0 2014-RIV-1503 64 3,360 7 93 2014-RIV-1504 13 122 7 93 2014-RIV-1505 44 731 37 63 2014-RIV-1506 47 1,666 24 76 2014-RIV-1507 0 2014-RIV-1508 227 1,631 32 68 2014-RIV-1510 3 345 1 99 2014-RIV-1511 79 489 62 68 2014-RIV-1512 0 2014-RIV-1513 15 8,024 7 93 2014-RIV-1514 32 750 49 51 2014-RIV-1515 18 8,967 10 90 2014-RIV-1516 55 1,628 12 88 2014-RIV-1517 71 1,596 6 94 8 92 2014-RIV-1518 2014-RIV-1519 This wiretap interception order led to the seizure of 13 pounds of methamphetamine and $60,400 in narcotic proceeds. As a result of this wire interception, 2 kilograms of cocaine and $21,563 were seized. During this period of interceptions, agents seized a mixture of 200 pounds of heroin and 60 pounds of cocaine. As a result of this wire interception, $308,710 and 3 kilograms of cocaine were seized. As a result of this wire interception, three people were arrested, and 60 pounds of marijuana and 5 firearms were seized. As a result of this wire interception, 3 pounds of methamphetamine and one vehicle was seized, and one arrest was made. 0 11 167 46 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-RIV-1520 186 7,939 14 86 2014-RIV-1521 5 357 56 44 2014-RIV-1522 65 988 22 78 2014-RIV-1523 28 4,307 52 48 2014-RIV-1524 As a result of this wire interception, two people were arrested and 4 pounds of methamphetamine and 1 kilogram of cocaine were seized. As a result of this wire interception, 26 kilograms of heroin, 474 kilograms of cocaine, 8.55 kilograms of methamphetamine, and $507,680 were seized. Interceptions assisted in the seizure of $279,805 in narcotic proceeds. 0 2014-RIV-1525 230 3,119 5 95 2014-RIV-1526 112 830 5 95 2014-RIV-1527 34 2,277 12 88 2014-RIV-1528 65 1,400 33 67 2014-RIV-1529 113 2,993 28 72 7 93 2014-RIV-1530 2014-RIV-1533 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 As a result of this wire interception, 5 kilograms of cocaine was seized, and four arrests were made. Interceptions led to the identification of additional telephone numbers of associates of the drug trafficking organization (DTO). 0 31 2014-RIV-1534 746 0 2014-RIV-1535 1 212 1 99 2014-RIV-1538 9 2,437 17 83 2014-RIV-1539 20 4,097 31 69 2014-RIV-1540 1 22 0 100 2014-RIV-1541 23 222 52 48 2014-RIV-1542 4 348 7 93 2014-RIV-1544 4 645 1 99 2014-RIV-1545 0 2014-RIV-1546 0 2014-RIV-1547 0 2014-RIV-1549 0 47 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-RIV-1550 43 1,890 38 62 2014-RIV-1551 0 9 0 100 15 85 2014-RIV-1552 2014-RIV-1553 As a result of this wire interception, two arrests were made and $308,710 in narcotic proceeds was seized. 0 7 2014-RIV-1554 283 0 2014-RIV-1555 175 7,110 18 82 2014-RIV-1557 31 633 11 89 2014-RIV-1558 159 8,898 10 90 2014-RIV-1559 0 152 0 100 2014-RIV-1561 As a result of this wire interception, 10 ounces of heroin and 2 kilograms of cocaine were seized. No activity to report. 0 2014-RIV-1563 45 1,793 13 87 2014-RIV-1565 90 4,537 11 89 2014-RIV-1568 11 222 68 32 2014-RIV-1569 5 307 5 95 2014-RIV-1570 As a result of this wire interception, $493,978 in narcotic proceeds was seized. 0 2014-RIV-1571 25 262 36 64 2014-RIV-1572 27 1,492 8 92 2014-RIV-1573 0 2014-RIV-1574 0 2014-RIV-1575 0 2014-RIV-1576 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 31 70,685 2014-RIV-1577 0 2014-RIV-1581 0 23 77 As a result of this wire interception, $308,710 and 3 kilograms of cocaine were seized, and two arrests were made. As a result of this wire interception, $308,710 in narcotic proceeds and 3 kilograms of cocaine were seized. This wiretap interception order assisted in the seizure of 26 kilograms of heroin, 474 kilograms of cocaine, 8 kilograms of methamphetamine, and $539,202 in narcotic proceeds. Installed but not used. 48 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted 2014-RIV-1582 2014-RIV-1586 San Bernardino (%) (%) 33 67 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 0 12 2014-RIV-1587 Sacramento Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications 49 0 2014-RIV-1589 2 38 0 100 2014-SAC-54 213 5,131 17 83 2014-SAC-56 45 732 4 96 2014-SAC-57 2 482 28 72 2014-SAC-59 3 1,513 29 71 See 2014-SAC-57. The intel received from the wiretap was valuable to further the investigation of an unsolved murder of an officer. Disposition of these defendants is still pending in Sacramento County. As a result of this wire interception, 38 pounds of cocaine, 8 pounds of methamphetamine, 6 pounds of heroin, 5 firearms, and $360,000 in drug proceeds were seized. Investigation concluded in San Joaquin and is being prosecuted there. 2014-SAC-60 9 9,821 4 96 As a result of this wire interception, detectives received crucial items of evidence through communications. All three defendants are pending murder and attempted murder charges. 2014-SAC-61 4 772 92 8 See 2014-SAC-57. 2014-SBD-538 31 390 71 29 2014-SBD-539 22 160 22 78 2014-SBD-540 13 135 89 11 2014-SBD-542 95 1,484 19 81 2014-SBD-543 2,102 5,126 10 90 2014-SBD-544 5 1,965 38 62 2014-SBD-545 47 5,859 15 85 2014-SBD-546 201 13,228 5 95 As a result of this wire interception, $68,000 in narcotic proceeds, 63 pounds of methamphetamine and one firearm were seized, and one arrest was made. The phone was changed prior to arrests and seizures. Other subjects have been identified and this case is ongoing. As a result of this wire interception, 8 kilograms of heroin and $20,000.00 were seized. 49 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction San Bernardino (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 (%) 2014-SBD-547 127 13,028 5 95 2014-SBD-548 368 12,025 19 81 2014-SBD-549 0 112 0 100 2014-SBD-550 4 758 17 83 2014-SBD-551 154 3,154 13 87 2014-SBD-552 114 2,133 23 77 2014-SBD-553 616 7,604 21 79 2014-SBD-554 99 1,842 4 96 2014-SBD-555 5 87 19 81 2014-SBD-557 1,299 3,333 6 94 2014-SBD-558 90 1,203 24 76 As part of an ongoing murder investigation, three suspects had been identified. A multiagency task force that assisted with a local authorities obtained evidence against the perpetrators, their coconspirators, aiders and abettors. The content of the intercepted communications confirmed the identity of three suspects, who were members of a criminal street gang, and who were subsequently arrested. Two out of the three were charged with murder. As a result of this wire interception, 10 pounds of opium (Mexican Brown) was seized as well as $91,000 in narcotic proceeds. The wire intercept was conducted after exhausting leads on a gangrelated murder and allowed investigators to obtain incriminating evidence sufficient for charges to be filed on the offenses of murder, attempted murder, participation in a criminal street gang, and accessory to murder on seven defendants. As a result of this wire interception, 3 kilograms of heroin and $91,000 were seized, and one person was arrested. As a result of this wire interception, 20 kilograms of heroin and $200,000 were seized, and five people were arrested. As a result of this wire interception, 18 pounds of methamphetamine, 4 kilograms of heroin and $56,000 were seized, and four people were arrested. As a result of this wire interception, 10 kilograms of cocaine and 1 pound of methamphetamine were seized. No seizures were based off of these intercepts. As a result of this wire interception, 2 pounds of methamphetamine and 4 kilograms of heroin were seized, and two arrests were made. 50 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction San Bernardino (cont’d) EICOS No. 2014-SBD-559 Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted 37 423 (%) (%) 22 78 2014-SBD-560 33 4,307 4 96 2014-SBD-561 26 325 13 87 2014-SBD-562 29 224 16 84 2014-SBD-563 72 7,818 2 98 2014-SBD-564 126 4,086 2 98 2014-SBD-566 70 751 40 60 2014-SBD-567 37 6,862 1 99 2014-SBD-569 35 238 31 69 2014-SBD-570 2014-SBD-571 San Diego Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications 2014-SD-180 46 1,437 1,131 See 2014-SBD-559. Subject discontinued using this phone after his arrest. Agents seized 21 pounds of methamphetamine and $30,000 from the subject. Agents will file criminal charges on the subject at the termination of this case. As a result of this wire interception, the suspect was arrested on suspicion of committing multiple murders. The arrest concluded a four year investigation spanning multiple counties. As a result of these interceptions, investigators seized 8 pounds of heroin, 1 pound of methamphetamine, 1 handgun, and $52,000 in narcotic proceeds. These seizures are significant amounts of narcotics and have a direct impact on the community. The subjects were believed to be using additional telephones for their criminal activity. The investigation is ongoing. See 2014-SBD-561. The subject was believed to be using an additional telephone for his criminal activity. The investigation is ongoing. There have been no seizures directly related to this wiretap, however, other subjects have been identified and this case is ongoing. 0 80 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 17 49 83 51 During the course of wire intercepts, agents seized 18 pounds of methamphetamine and 1 kilogram of cocaine, and agents arrested three individuals and anticipate two more arrests. 51 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction San Diego (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 (%) 2014-SD-181 103 23,001 8 92 2014-SD-182 305 11,015 19 81 2014-SD-183 106 5,295 22 78 2014-SD-185 5 65 18 82 2014-SD-186 78 1,707 84 16 2014-SD-187 118 12,764 14 86 2014-SD-188 0 0 0 0 2014-SD-189 138 4,397 37 63 This was a federal agency investigation into a Mexico-based drug trafficking organization (DTO) specializing in the importation, transportation, and distribution of multi-pound quantities of cocaine and methamphetamine from Mexicali, Mexico to several cities in the United States and Canada. During the course of the investigation, agents seized 12.56 kilograms of cocaine, 3.36 kilograms of heroin, and 3 guns. Investigation includes wires 13-17 (EICOS 2013SD-170), 13-18 and 14-02 (EICOS 2014-SD-194). Subjects were members of an international drug trafficking network responsible for distributing multiple pound quantities of methamphetamine within San Diego County. Investigation led to the seizure of 8 pounds of methamphetamine, the conviction of nine co-conspirators, and the identification of higher ranking members of the organization. Investigation included wires 14-03 and 14-07. The intercepts of target phone numbers provided agents with information about narcotic smuggling throughout the United States. During the course of this ongoing investigation, agents seized 21.4 pounds of methamphetamine, 49.7 pounds of marijuana, 10 grams of heroin, and $500 in narcotic proceeds. Investigation included wires 14-06, 14-10 and 14-13. 52 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction San Diego (cont’d) San Joaquin EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-SD-190 165 4,878 8 92 2014-SD-191 57 263 0 100 2014-SD-192 217 13,066 4 96 2014-SD-193 120 33,551 27 46 2014-SD-195 57 540 7 93 2015-SJ-36 208 16,620 2 98 2015-SJ-37 0 2015-SJ-38 0 2015-SJ-39 0 2015-SJ-40 0 2015-SJ-41 0 2015-SJ-42 0 2015-SJ-43 0 2015-SJ-44 0 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 The wire enabled federal agents to further infiltrate the DTO and dismantle the organization responsible for distributing multikilograms of narcotics in Southern California. During the investigation, agents seized 41 pounds of cocaine and 1.5 pounds of methamphetamine. Investigation included wires 14-05, 14-08 and 1412. This investigation involved efforts to solve a double murder that occurred in 1996. The investigation included wires 14-01 and 14-11. It did not result in any arrests. Investigation into the drug trafficking activities of a Mexico-based drug trafficking organization (DTO) involved in the importation, transportation, and distribution of large, multiple pound quantities of methamphetmine into San Diego County. Additionally, the DTO coordinates the laundering of monetary proceeds from the narcotic sales through money pick-ups and bank account deposits made throughout the United States. Investigation includes wires 14-04 and 14-09. See 2014-SD-191. Intercepts were used to prosecute a criminal street gang for robbery, narcotics, and human trafficking. Wire intercepts were used for a murder investigation. Wire intercepts were used for a murder investigation. Wire intercepts were used for a murder investigation. Wire intercepts were used to investigate a criminal street gang. Wire intercepts were used to investigate a criminal street gang. Wire intercepts were used to investigate a criminal street gang. Wire intercepts were used to investigate a criminal street gang. 53 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction San Joaquin (cont’d) EICOS No. 2015-SJ-45 2015-SJ-46 Santa Barbara Santa Clara Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) Wire intercepts were used to prosecute a criminal street gang. 0 111 1,014 37 63 711 8.5 91 2014-SBA-47 1,639 1 99 2014-SBA-48 181 24 76 2014-SBA-49 3,069 32 68 2015-SJ-47 0 2015-SJ-48 0 2015-SJ-49 0 2015-SJ-50 0 2015-SJ-51 0 2015-SJ-52 0 2015-SJ-53 0 2014-SBA-46 59 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 2014-SCL-71 27 729 23 77 2014-SCL-72 51 708 40 60 2014-SCL-74 124 1,873 23 77 2014-SCL-75 13 171 71 29 Wire intercepts were used to investigate a homicide investigation. Wire intercepts were used to prosecute a criminal street gang. Intercepts were used in an investigation of a bank robbery murder involving hostages. Wire intercepts were used to investigate a homicide prosecution. Wire intercepts were used to investigate a homicide prosecution. Wire intercepts were used to investigate a homicide prosecution. Wire intercepts were used to investigate a homicide prosecution. Wire intercepts were used to investigate a homicide prosecution. The interception was directed at two suspects in a murder. The year long investigation had exhausted investigative techniques. The wire was intended to capture coconspirator statements regarding the murder that could not otherwise be obtained. This investigation involved a cold case homicide that occurred in 1989. The wire was used to intercept calls between the two suspects. The investigation was reopened in 2012 with a DNA hit. Intercepted calls revealed important facts and admissions. The investigation is ongoing by the District Attorney's Office. See WT 14-01 for a summary of the investigation. See WT 14-08, 14-09, 14-10, 14-11 and 14-13. See WT 14-08, 14-09, 14-10, 14-11 and 14-13. 54 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Santa Clara (cont’d) Sonoma EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 (%) 2014-SCL-76 76 1,295 32 68 This investigation (WT 12-15, 12-16, 12-19, 13-06, 13-08, 13-09, 13-11, 13-13, 14-02, 14-04, 14-05, 14-06 and 14-07) led to the dismantling of this drug trafficking organization (DTO) being sourced directly from Mexico and distributing narcotics all the way up to Canada. This investigation led to the arrest of 22 individuals, $150,000 in asset seizures, and the seizure of 9 firearms, a methamphetamine conversion lab, a butane hash oil lab, 14 pounds of heroin, 24 pounds of methamphetamine, 8 gallons of liquid methamphetamine, 15 pounds of cocaine, and 60 pounds of processed marijuana. 2014-SCL-77 23 129 10 90 See 2014-SCL-76. 2014-SCL-78 51 109 73 27 See 2014-SCL-76. 2014-SCL-79 173 3,577 11 89 See 2014-SCL-76. 2014-SCL-80 88 2,112 45 55 See 2014-SCL-76. 2014-SCL-81 74 3,006 28 72 2014-SCL-82 14 152 51 49 2014-SCL-83 73 1,952 38 62 2014-SCL-84 249 5,387 13 87 2014-SON-6 40 875 10 90 See WT 14-08, 14-09, 14-10, 14-11 and 14-13. See WT 14-08, 14-09, 14-10, 14-11 and 14-13. This is a pending investigation into a gang and narcotics distribution operation. Arrests have been effectuated, but more are imminent. Substantial quantities of cocaine, cocaine base, methamphetamine, and marijuana have been seized. In addition, two drug labs and multiple firearms have been uncovered. The wiretap solidified a case involving multiple bank robberies and arrest warrants were issued. When search warrants were executed, a handgun was located along with 2 ballistic vests, cell phones, cell phone records, and paperwork were located in various locations along with clothing that linked suspects to the robberies. Police in a homicide investigation obtained additional evidence to corroborate DNA evidence found at the scene to the perpetrator of the murder. 55 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 Wire interceptions provided critical information as to persons involved in a cold case homicide investigation from 1992. The wire interceptions allowed a federal and county task force to seize 815 grams of crystal methamphetamine, 163 grams of cocaine and $95,564.15 in assets from a drug trafficking organization (DTO). The intercepts assisted in the arrests of five individuals and the closure of a business that was used to distribute crystal methamphetamine.. To date, one member of the DTO has been convicted and hearings and trials for the other four members are pending. Sonoma (cont’d) 2014-SON-7 27 147 10 90 Stanislaus 2014-STA-63 14 1,006 12.8 21 2014-STA-64 2 0 0 71 See results reported on 14-07. 2014-STA-65 65 831 19 19 See results reported on 14-01. 2014-STA-67 211 5,666 4.5 94.5 2014-STA-68 12 150 9 52 Tulare Intercept led to the arrest of two people for a gang related homicide. See results reported for 14-01. This interception of drug related phone calls enables law enforcement to dismantle and disrupt drug trade organizations and reduce violent gang activity associated with drug deals. Wire interception resulted in the dismantling of a drug smuggling cartel operating from Mexico to Northern California, 700 pounds of methamphetamine was seized and three federally indicted suspects are still at large. 2014-STA-69 80 916 26.3 74 2014-STA-70 133 1,970 21 36 2014-STA-71 9 66 22.3 27.7 See results shown on 14-08. 2014-STA-72 17 118 13.4 16.4 See results reported on 14-08. 2014-STA-73 42 4,720 3.6 53.1 See results reports on 14-08. 2014-STA-74 30 2,016 7 43.8 See results reported on 14-08. 2014-STA-75 17 651 9.5 67.8 See results reported on 14-08. 2014-STA-76 30 1,853 11.7 65 See results reported in 14-08. 2014-STA-77 26 1,010 8.9 71.7 See results reported in 14-08. 2014-TUL-8 3 84 2014-TUL-9 7 309 56 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Tulare (cont’d) Ventura EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) 2014-TUL-10 38 4,221 2014-TUL-11 70 4,391 2014-TUL-12 68 3,348 2014-TUL-13 14 386 2014-TUL-14 47 1,179 2014-TUL-15 69 7,523 2014-TUL-16 63 1,294 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 (%) As a result of this wire interception, 1 pound of methamphetamine was seized. As a result of this wire interception, 1 pound of methamphetamine was seized. 2014-TUL-18 2,037 262 2015-TUL-19 0 0 2013-VE-74 326 19,149 9 91 2014-VE-84 427 95,415 14 86 2014-VE-85 428 20,683 12 88 2014-VE-86 328 211,492 6 94 2014-VE-87 15 389 7 93 2014-VE-88 179 22,388 4 96 2014-VE-89 70 4,236 14 86 2014-VE-90 64 4,469 11 89 During this time frame, three subjects were arrested and are pending charges. A total of 2 pounds of methamphetamine was seized. During this time frame, there were no phone calls made on this target telephone. Detectives located a methamphetamine conversion lab and recovered 26 pounds of methamphetamine and 4 liters of liquid methamphetamine. Detectives also interdicted heroin and methamphetamine being transited through Ventura County. Investigation led to discovery of a methamphetamine recovery and conversion lab, liquid methamphetamine, and 26 pounds of methamphetamine. Gang members were committing residential burglaries of homes belonging to people of Indian ethnicity based upon a cultural tendency to possess gold. The money generated from the burglaries was used to further the criminal activities of the gang. 57 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Ventura (cont’d) EICOS No. Approximate No. of Persons Whose Communications Were Intercepted Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Total No. of Communications Incriminating Other Intercepted Communications Communications (%) (%) 2014-VE-91 136 5,650 20 80 2014-VE-92 4 286 3 97 2014-VE-93 120 3,490 9 91 2014-VE-94 185 17,789 12 88 2014-VE-95 489 36,375 16 84 2014-VE-96 569 18,681 7 93 2014-VE-97 92 3,911 14 86 2014-VE-98 28 1,276 26 74 2014-VE-99 806 36,375 6 94 2014-VE-100 88 4,037 17 83 2014-VE-101 213 14,332 7 93 2014-VE-102 66 2,937 20 80 2014-VE-103 1,111 45,207 7 93 2014-VE-104 62 1,387 28 72 2014-VE-105 62 2,340 5 95 2014-VE-106 334 9,944 5 95 2014-VE-109 4 16 19 81 2014-VE-110 53 6,733 54 46 2014-VE-111 43 474 16 84 2014-VE-113 62 684 25 75 Comments on Usefulness of Intercept 3 Defendants conspired with a confidential informant to murder a perceived informant. The murder was to be funded with the proceeds from an identity theft scheme. Primary subject of gang-related drug dealing and extortion wiretap investigation was murdered on second day of interception. Wiretap led to information regarding the murder. Heroin and methamphetamine were seized in a vehicle which crossed the US/Mexico border and drove directly to Ventura County. Multiple pounds of methamphetamine was recovered from stash house in San Bernardino County. 58 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Alameda 2014-ALA-19 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/24/2015 12/18/2014 2014-ALA-20 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/24/2015 12/18/2014 2014-ALA-24 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/18/2014 2014-ALA-28 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/16/2015 1/9/2015 2014-ALA-29 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/16/2015 1/9/2015 2014-ALA-30 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/16/2015 1/9/2015 2014-ALA-31 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/16/2015 1/9/2015 2014-ALA-32 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/16/2015 1/9/2015 2014-ALA-33 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/16/2015 1/9/2015 2014-ALA-34 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/16/2015 1/9/2015 2014-CO-1 Peterson, DA Hon. Laettner (Inventory due) 10/17/2014 9/13/2014 2014-CO-2 Peterson, DA Hon. Laettner (Inventory due) 1/20/2015 2014-CC-8 Peterson, DA Hon. Laettner (Inventory due) 4/21/2014 10/9/2014 2014-CC-9 Peterson, DA Hon. Laettner (Inventory due) 4/21/2014 10/9/2014 2014-CC-10 Peterson, DA Hon. Laettner (Inventory due) 11/14/2014 9/13/2014 2014-CC-11 Peterson, DA Hon. Laettner (Inventory due) 12/12/2014 9/13/2014 2014-ED-1 Horn, Det. Hon. Wagoner 1/17/2014 1/14/2014 2014-ED-2 Bice, Investigative Asst. DA Hon. Wagoner 2/7/2014 2/6/2014 Contra Costa El Dorado 9 59 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Fresno 2014-FR-6 Egan, DA Hon. Harrell (Inventory due) 4/10/2014 2014-FR-7 Egan, DA Hon. Harrell (Inventory due) 4/10/2014 2014-FR-8 Egan, DA Hon. Harrell (Inventory due) 4/10/2014 2014-FR-9 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 11/25/2014 2014-FR-11 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 12/18/2014 2014-FR-13 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 12/7/2014 2014-FR-14 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 12/7/2014 2014-FR-15 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 12/28/2014 2014-FR-16 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/18/2015 2014-FR-17 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/8/2015 2014-FR-18 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 3/10/2015 2014-FR-19 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/3/2015 2014-FR-20 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/16/2015 2014-FR-21 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 1/28/2015 2014-FR-22 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 1/12/2015 2014-FR-23 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 1/26/2015 2014-FR-24 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 1/27/2015 2014-FR-25 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/13/2015 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 60 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Fresno (cont’d) 2014-FR-26 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 1/23/2015 2014-FR-27 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/17/2015 2014-FR-28 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/1/2015 2014-FR-29 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/14/2015 2014-FR-30 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/16/2015 2014-FR-31 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/16/2015 2013-KE-35 Green, DA Hon. Twisselman 4/27/2014 2013-KE-36 Green, DA Hon. Twisselman 4/27/2014 2014-KE-37 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 7/23/2014 0 2014-KE-38 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 11/6/2014 0 2014-KE-39 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/2/2015 2014-KE-40 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 12/14/2014 2014-KE-41 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/2/2015 1/28/2015 46 2014-KE-42 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/2/2015 1/28/2015 46 2014-KE-43 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/2/2015 1/28/2015 46 2014-KE-44 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee (Inventory due) 1/18/2015 2014-KE-45 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/19/2015 2014-KE-46 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/19/2015 Kern 1/28/2015 46 0 61 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Kern (cont’d) 2015-KE-47 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/18/2015 1/22/2015 13 2015-KE-48 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/18/2015 1/22/2015 13 2014-KE-49 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 10/9/2014 1/29/2015 7 2014-KE-50 Green, DA Hon. Lewis 2/19/2015 2014-KE-51 Green, DA Hon. Lewis 2/19/2015 2014-KE-52 Green, Da Hon. Lewis 2/19/2015 2014-KE-53 Green, DA Hon. Lewis 2/19/2015 2014-KI-16 Hacker, DA Hon. Reinhardt 10/20/2014 9/15/2014 50 2014-KI-17 Hacker, DA Hon. Tarter 1/13/2015 10/23/2014 5 2014-LA-747 Lacey, DA Hon. FIDLER 4/1/2014 2014-LA-748 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/21/2014 2014-LA-749 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 7/19/2014 2014-LA-750 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 4/8/2014 2014-LA-751 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/12/2014 2014-LA-752 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/14/2014 2014-LA-753 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/20/2014 2014-LA-754 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/7/2014 2014-LA-755 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/12/2014 Kings Los Angeles 62 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-756 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/5/2014 2014-LA-757 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/20/2014 2014-LA-758 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/26/2014 2014-LA-759 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/28/2014 2014-LA-760 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/26/2014 2014-LA-761 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/21/2014 2014-LA-762 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 6/28/2014 2014-LA-763 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/28/2014 2014-LA-764 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 5/23/2014 2014-LA-765 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 8/28/2014 2014-LA-766 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 7/16/2014 2014-LA-768 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 7/17/2014 2014-LA-769 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 8/16/2014 2014-LA-770 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 7/28/2014 2014-LA-771 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/6/2014 2014-LA-772 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/6/2014 2014-LA-773 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/11/2014 2014-LA-774 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/15/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 63 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-775 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/9/2014 2014-LA-776 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/27/2014 2014-LA-777 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/28/2014 2014-LA-778 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/29/2014 2014-LA-779 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 8/27/2014 2014-LA-780 Lacey, DA Hon. Olmedo 8/22/2014 2014-LA-781 Lacey, DA Hon. Olmedo 9/17/2014 2014-LA-782 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/23/2014 2014-LA-783 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 9/15/2014 2013-LA-786 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/23/2014 2014-LA-787 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/18/2014 2014-LA-788 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/19/2014 2014-LAK-2 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/28/2014 2014-LA-789 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/29/2014 2014-LA-790 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/28/2014 2014-LA-791 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/25/2014 2014-LA-792 Lacey, DA Hon. Olmedo 8/21/2014 2014-LA-793 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/29/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 0 0 64 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-794 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/28/2014 2014-LA-795 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/29/2014 2014-LA-796 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 9/3/2014 2014-LA-797 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/5/2014 13-155 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/11/2014 2014-LA-800 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 2/11/2014 2014-LA-801 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 2/9/2014 2014-LA-804 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 4/3/2014 2014-LA-805 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/19/2014 2014-LA-806 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/2/2014 2014-LA-807 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/10/2014 2014-LA-808 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/18/2014 2014-LA-809 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/9/2014 2014-LA-810 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/27/2014 2014-LA-811 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 9/21/2014 2014-LA-812 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/13/2014 2014-LA-813 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/24/2014 2014-LA-814 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/29/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 65 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-815 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/30/2014 2014-LA-816 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/8/2014 2014-LA-817 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/5/2014 2014-LA-818 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/7/2014 2014-LA-820 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/14/2014 2014-LA-821 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/27/2014 2014-LA-822 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 9/1/2014 2014-LA-823 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/24/2014 2014-LA-824 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/12/2014 2014-LA-825 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/24/2014 2014-LA-826 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/3/2014 2014-LA-827 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/25/2014 2014-LA-828 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/7/2014 2014-LAS-6 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 1/7/2015 2014-LA-829 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/11/2014 2014-LA-831 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/13/2014 2014-LA-832 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/28/2014 2014-LA-833 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 2/22/2015 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 66 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-834 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 2/28/2015 2014-LA-835 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/1/2015 2014-LA-836 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/17/2014 2014-LA-838 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/19/2014 2014-LA-839 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/9/2015 2014-LA-840 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/27/2014 2014-LA-841 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/11/2014 2014-LA-842 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/29/2014 2014-LA-843 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/3/2014 2014-LA-844 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/17/2014 2014-LA-845 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 1/26/2015 2014-LA-847 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/28/2014 2014-LA-848 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 2/14/2015 2014-LA-849 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/1/2014 2014-LA-850 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/25/2014 2014-LA-851 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/1/2015 2014-LA-852 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/10/2015 2014-LA-853 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 1/30/2015 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 67 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-854 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/6/2014 2014-LA-855 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/20/2014 2014-LA-856 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/4/2014 2014-LA-857 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/4/2014 2014-LA-858 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/28/2014 2014-LA-859 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 1/25/2015 2014-LA-860 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 1/3/2015 2014-LA-861 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/18/2014 2014-LA-862 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/12/2014 2014-LA-863 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 1/8/2015 2014-LA-864 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 1/22/2015 2014-LA-866 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/12/2015 2014-LA-867 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 2/14/2015 2014-LA-868 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 2/27/2015 2014-LA-869 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/16/2015 2014-LA-870 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/18/2014 2014-LAS-7 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/12/2015 2014-LA-871 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/12/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 68 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LAS-8 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/16/2015 2014-LA-872 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/24/2015 2014-LA-873 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 9/9/2014 2014-LA-874 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 9/9/2014 2014-LA-876 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/23/2014 2014-LA-877 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/23/2014 2014-LA-878 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/23/2015 2014-LA-879 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 9/24/2014 2014-LA-880 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/6/2014 2014-LA-881 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/28/2014 2014-LA-883 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/3/2014 2014-LA-884 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/2/2014 2014-MAD-5 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 2/6/2015 2014-MAD-7 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 2/13/2015 2014-MAD-8 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 2/13/2015 2014-MAD-9 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 2/13/2015 2014-MAD-10 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 3/10/2015 2014-MAD-12 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 3/10/2015 Madera Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 69 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Madera (cont’d) 2014-MAD-13 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 3/10/2015 2014-MAD-15 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 3/10/2015 Merced 2014-MER-27 Morse, DA Hon. Bacciarini 7/1/2014 Napa 2014-NA-1 Lieberstein, DA Hon. Boessenecker (Inventory due) 10/26/2014 Orange 2014-OR-86 Rackauckas, DA Hon. Jensen 6/27/2014 2014-OR-87 Rackauckas, DA Hon. Jensen 2/23/2015 2014-OR-88 Rackauckas, DA Hon. Jensen 2/23/2015 2014-PLA-3 Wilson, ADA Hon. Wachob 5/29/2014 2014-PLA-4 Wilson, ADA Hon. Wachob 5/29/2014 2013-RIV-899 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/1/2014 2013-RIV-902 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/3/2014 2013-RIV-904 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/5/2014 2013-RIV-905 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/10/2014 2013-RIV-906 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/9/2014 2013-RIV-911 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/9/2014 2013-RIV-915 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014 2013-RIV-916 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/16/2014 2013-RIV-922 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 4/17/2014 Placer Riverside Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 7/1/2014 1060 7/9/2014 8 6/4/2014 39 6/4/2014 19 9/25/2014 70 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2013-RIV-925 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/3/2014 2013-RIV-926 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/2/2014 2013-RIV-927 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/3/2013 2013-RIV-928 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/7/2014 2013-RIV-929 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/3/2014 2013-RIV-930 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/2/2014 2013-RIV-931 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/2/2014 2013-RIV-932 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/7/2014 2013-RIV-933 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/8/2014 2013-RIV-934 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/3/2014 2013-RIV-935 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/9/2014 2013-RIV-936 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/5/2014 2013-RIV-937 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/29/2014 2013-RIV-938 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/10/2014 2013-RIV-939 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/5/2014 2013-RIV-940 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/5/2014 2013-RIV-941 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/6/2014 2013-RIV-942 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/11/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 71 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2013-RIV-943 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/15/2014 2013-RIV-944 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/17/2014 2013-RIV-945 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/17/2014 2013-RIV-946 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/18/2014 2013-RIV-947 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/20/2014 2013-RIV-948 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/18/2014 2013-RIV-949 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/18/2014 2013-RIV-950 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/18/2014 2013-RIV-951 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/23/2014 2013-RIV-952 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/15/2014 2013-RIV-954 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/26/2014 2013-RIV-955 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/26/2014 2013-RIV-956 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 4/11/2014 2014-RIV-957 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/7/2014 2014-RIV-958 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/7/2014 2014-RIV-959 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/7/2014 2014-RIV-960 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/7/2014 2014-RIV-961 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/27/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 72 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-962 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/9/2014 2014-RIV-963 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/9/2014 2014-RIV-964 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/9/2014 2014-RIV-965 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/8/2014 2014-RIV-966 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/7/2014 2014-RIV-967 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/30/2014 2014-RIV-968 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/23/2014 2014-RIV-969 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/14/2014 2014-RIV-970 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/14/2014 2014-RIV-971 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/11/2014 2014-RIV-972 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/13/2014 2014-RIV-973 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/16/2014 2014-RIV-974 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/16/2014 2014-RIV-975 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/20/2014 2014-RIV-976 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/6/2014 2014-RIV-977 Zellerbach, DA 2014-RIV-980 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/20/2014 2014-RIV-981 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/11/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 5/15/2014 73 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-982 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/26/2014 2014-RIV-983 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/26/2014 2014-RIV-984 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/26/2014 2014-RIV-985 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/22/2014 2014-RIV-986 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/25/2014 2014-RIV-987 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/6/2014 2014-RIV-988 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/26/2014 2014-RIV-989 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/15/2014 2014-RIV-990 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/12/2014 2014-RIV-991 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/16/2014 2014-RIV-992 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/27/2014 2014-RIV-993 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/27/2014 2014-RIV-994 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/1/2014 2014-RIV-995 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/6/2014 2014-RIV-996 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/17/2014 2013-RIV-997 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/1/2014 2014-RIV-998 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/25/2014 2014-RIV-999 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/3/2015 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 74 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1000 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/29/2014 2014-RIV-1001 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/4/2014 2014-RIV-1002 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/4/2014 2014-RIV-1003 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/25/2014 2014-RIV-1004 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/18/2014 2014-RIV-1005 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/24/2014 2014-RIV-1006 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/9/2014 2014-RIV-1007 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/12/2014 2014-RIV-1008 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/20/2014 2014-RIV-1009 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/7/2014 2014-RIV-1010 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/6/2014 2014-RIV-1011 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/9/2014 2014-RIV-1012 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/9/2014 2014-RIV-1013 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/9/2014 2014-RIV-1014 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/11/2014 2014-RIV-1016 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/14/2014 2014-RIV-1017 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/15/2014 2014-RIV-1018 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/12/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 9/25/2014 75 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1019 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/15/2014 2014-RIV-1020 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/15/2014 2014-RIV-1021 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/18/2014 2014-RIV-1022 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/15/2014 2014-RIV-1023 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/16/2014 2014-RIV-1024 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/15/2014 2014-RIV-1025 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/14/2014 2014-RIV-1026 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/20/2014 2014-RIV-1027 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/19/2014 2014-RIV-1028 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/20/2014 2014-RIV-1029 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/20/2014 2014-RIV-1030 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/20/2014 2014-RIV-1031 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/18/2014 2014-RIV-1032 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/22/2014 2014-RIV-1033 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/22/2014 2014-RIV-1034 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/11/2014 2014-RIV-1035 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/17/2014 2014-RIV-1036 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/22/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 76 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1037 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/22/2014 2014-RIV-1039 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/22/2014 2014-RIV-1040 Zellerbach, DA 2014-RIV-1041 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/1/2014 2014-RIV-1042 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/11/2014 2014-RIV-1043 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/17/2014 2014-RIV-1044 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/28/2014 2014-RIV-1045 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/27/2014 2013-RIV-1046 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/29/2014 2014-RIV-1047 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/24/2014 2014-RIV-1048 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/28/2014 2014-RIV-1049 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/25/2014 2014-RIV-1050 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/27/2014 2014-RIV-1051 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/2/2014 2014-RIV-1052 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/28/2014 2014-RIV-1053 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/21/2014 2014-RIV-1054 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/26/2014 2014-RIV-1055 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/30/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 6/27/2014 77 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1056 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/1/2014 2014-RIV-1057 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/4/2014 2014-RIV-1058 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/2/2014 2014-RIV-1059 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/4/2014 2014-RIV-1060 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/10/2014 2014-RIV-1061 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/4/2014 2014-RIV-1062 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/10/2014 2014-RIV-1063 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/5/2014 2014-RIV-1064 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/10/2014 2014-RIV-1065 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/6/2014 2014-RIV-1066 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/5/2014 2014-RIV-1067 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/3/2014 2014-RIV-1068 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/6/2014 2014-RIV-1070 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/15/2014 2014-RIV-1071 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/12/2014 2014-RIV-1072 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/21/2014 2014-RIV-1073 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/12/2014 2014-RIV-1074 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/11/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 78 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1075 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/19/2014 2014-RIV-1076 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/8/2014 2014-RIV-1078 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/8/2014 2014-RIV-1079 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014 2014-RIV-1080 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/10/2014 2013-RIV-1081 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/11/2014 2014-RIV-1082 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/16/2014 2014-RIV-1083 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/3/2014 2014-RIV-1084 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/14/2014 2014-RIV-1085 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/15/2014 2014-RIV-1086 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/26/2014 2014-RIV-1087 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/27/2014 2014-RIV-1088 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/16/2014 2014-RIV-1089 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/16/2014 2014-RIV-1090 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/16/2014 2014-RIV-1091 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/16/2014 2014-RIV-1092 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/17/2014 2014-RIV-1093 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/17/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 79 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1094 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/19/2014 2014-RIV-1095 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/22/2014 2014-RIV-1096 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/21/2014 2014-RIV-1097 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/25/2014 2014-RIV-1098 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/24/2014 2014-RIV-1099 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/24/2014 2014-RIV-1100 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/23/2014 2014-RIV-1101 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/23/2014 2014-RIV-1102 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/24/2014 2014-RIV-1103 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/24/2014 2014-RIV-1104 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/28/2014 2014-RIV-1106 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/25/2014 2014-RIV-1108 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/25/2014 2014-RIV-1109 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/26/2014 2014-RIV-1110 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/26/2014 2014-RIV-1111 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/27/2014 2014-RIV-1112 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/26/2014 2014-RIV-1113 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/27/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 80 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1114 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/27/2014 2014-RIV-1115 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/30/2014 2014-RIV-1116 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/30/2014 2014-RIV-1117 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/22/2014 2014-RIV-1118 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/27/2014 2014-RIV-1119 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/1/2014 2014-RIV-1120 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/21/2014 2014-RIV-1121 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/28/2014 2014-RIV-1122 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/2/2013 2014-RIV-1123 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/30/2014 2014-RIV-1124 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/11/2014 2014-RIV-1125 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/6/2014 2014-RIV-1127 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014 2014-RIV-1128 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/4/2014 2014-RIV-1129 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/12/2014 2014-RIV-1130 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/3/2014 2014-RIV-1131 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/3/2014 2013-RIV-1132 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/10/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 81 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1133 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/7/2014 2014-RIV-1134 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/7/2014 2013-RIV-1135 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/7/2014 2014-RIV-1136 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/8/2014 2014-RIV-1137 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/8/2014 2014-RIV-1138 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/8/2014 2014-RIV-1139 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/2/2014 2014-RIV-1141 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/8/2014 2014-RIV-1142 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/8/2014 2014-RIV-1143 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/10/2014 2014-RIV-1144 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/13/2014 2014-RIV-1145 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/13/2014 2014-RIV-1146 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014 2014-RIV-1148 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/14/2014 2014-RIV-1149 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/14/2014 2014-RIV-1150 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/9/2014 2014-RIV-1151 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/29/2014 2014-RIV-1152 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/18/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 82 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1153 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/16/2014 2014-RIV-1154 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 9/12/2014 2014-RIV-1155 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/16/2014 2014-RIV-1156 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/17/2014 2014-RIV-1157 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/17/2014 2014-RIV-1158 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/17/2014 2014-RIV-1160 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/20/2014 2014-RIV-1161 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/29/2014 2014-RIV-1162 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/18/2014 2014-RIV-1163 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/18/2014 2014-RIV-1164 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/19/2014 2014-RIV-1165 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/21/2014 2014-RIV-1166 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/1/2014 2014-RIV-1167 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 9/18/2014 2014-RIV-1168 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/21/2014 2014-RIV-1169 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/20/2014 2014-RIV-1170 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/22/2014 2014-RIV-1171 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/28/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 83 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1172 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/21/2014 2014-RIV-1173 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/23/2014 2014-RIV-1174 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/23/2014 2014-RIV-1175 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/1/2014 2014-RIV-1176 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/20/2014 2013-RIV-1177 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/25/2014 2014-RIV-1178 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/25/2014 2014-RIV-1179 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/25/2014 2014-RIV-1180 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/10/2015 2014-RIV-1181 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/24/2014 2014-RIV-1182 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014 2014-RIV-1183 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/28/2014 2014-RIV-1184 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/9/2014 2014-RIV-1185 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/29/2014 2014-RIV-1186 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014 2014-RIV-1187 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014 2014-RIV-1188 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 9/3/2014 2014-RIV-1190 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 84 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1191 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014 2014-RIV-1192 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014 2014-RIV-1193 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014 2014-RIV-1194 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/3/2014 2014-RIV-1195 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/7/2014 2014-RIV-1196 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/10/2014 2014-RIV-1197 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014 2014-RIV-1198 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/28/2014 2014-RIV-1199 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014 2014-RIV-1200 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/21/2014 2014-RIV-1201 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014 2014-RIV-1202 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014 2014-RIV-1203 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 8/6/2014 2014-RIV-1204 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/28/2014 2014-RIV-1205 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014 2014-RIV-1206 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014 2014-RIV-1207 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/12/2014 2014-RIV-1208 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/12/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 85 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1209 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/3/2014 2014-RIV-1210 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/9/2014 2014-RIV-1211 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/9/2014 2014-RIV-1212 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/14/2014 2014-RIV-1213 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/13/2014 2014-RIV-1214 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/4/2015 2014-RIV-1215 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/14/2014 2014-RIV-1216 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/14/2014 2014-RIV-1217 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/13/2014 2014-RIV-1218 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/4/2015 2014-RIV-1219 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/3/2014 2014-RIV-1220 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015 2014-RIV-1221 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/15/2014 2014-RIV-1222 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/20/2014 2014-RIV-1223 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/18/2014 2014-RIV-1224 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/21/2014 2014-RIV-1225 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/31/2014 2014-RIV-1226 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/20/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 86 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1227 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/21/2014 2014-RIV-1229 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/21/2014 2014-RIV-1231 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/22/2014 2014-RIV-1232 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/6/2014 2014-RIV-1233 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/22/2014 2014-RIV-1234 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/1/2014 2014-RIV-1235 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/26/2014 2014-RIV-1236 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/26/2014 2014-RIV-1237 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/26/2014 2014-RIV-1238 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/26/2014 2014-RIV-1239 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/26/2014 2014-RIV-1240 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/26/2014 2014-RIV-1241 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/27/2014 2014-RIV-1242 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/27/2014 2014-RIV-1243 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/27/2014 2014-RIV-1244 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/27/2014 2014-RIV-1245 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/1/2014 2014-RIV-1246 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/17/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 87 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1247 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/1/2014 2014-RIV-1248 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/3/2014 2014-RIV-1249 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/3/2014 2014-RIV-1250 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/26/2014 2014-RIV-1251 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/1/2014 2014-RIV-1252 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/28/2014 2014-RIV-1253 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/13/2014 2014-RIV-1254 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/8/2014 2014-RIV-1255 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 10/4/2014 2014-RIV-1256 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/6/2014 2014-RIV-1257 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/19/2014 2014-RIV-1258 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/12/2014 2014-RIV-1259 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/7/2014 2014-RIV-1260 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/7/2014 2014-RIV-1261 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/9/2014 2014-RIV-1262 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 9/26/2014 2014-RIV-1263 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/8/2014 2014-RIV-1264 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/1/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 88 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1265 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/7/2014 2014-RIV-1266 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/10/2014 2014-RIV-1267 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014 2014-RIV-1268 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/15/2014 2014-RIV-1269 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/12/2014 2014-RIV-1270 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/7/2014 2014-RIV-1271 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/13/2014 2014-RIV-1272 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/13/2014 2014-RIV-1273 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/12/2014 2014-RIV-1275 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/15/2014 2014-RIV-1276 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 10/11/2014 2014-RIV-1277 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/13/2014 2014-RIV-1278 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/12/2014 2014-RIV-1280 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/7/2014 2014-RIV-1281 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/15/2014 2014-RIV-1282 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/19/2014 2014-RIV-1283 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/17/2014 2014-RIV-1284 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/17/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 89 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1285 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/18/2014 2014-RIV-1286 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/29/2014 2014-RIV-1287 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/24/2014 2014-RIV-1288 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/31/2014 2014-RIV-1289 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/19/2015 2014-RIV-1290 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/28/2014 2014-RIV-1291 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/31/2014 2014-RIV-1292 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/12/2014 2014-RIV-1293 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/31/2014 2014-RIV-1294 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/30/2014 2013-RIV-1295 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/1/2014 2014-RIV-1296 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/1/2014 2014-RIV-1297 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/2/2014 2014-RIV-1298 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/3/2014 2014-RIV-1299 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/2/2014 2014-RIV-1300 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014 2014-RIV-1301 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/1/2014 2014-RIV-1302 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/8/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 90 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1303 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/8/2014 2014-RIV-1304 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/8/2014 2014-RIV-1305 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/7/2014 2014-RIV-1306 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/7/2014 2014-RIV-1307 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/8/2014 2014-RIV-1308 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/16/2014 2014-RIV-1309 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 11/13/2014 2014-RIV-1310 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/8/2014 2014-RIV-1311 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/24/2014 2014-RIV-1312 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/15/2014 2014-RIV-1313 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/16/2014 2014-RIV-1315 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/21/2014 2014-RIV-1316 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/13/2014 2014-RIV-1317 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/16/2014 2014-RIV-1319 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/5/2014 2014-RIV-1320 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/13/2014 2014-RIV-1321 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/1/2014 2014-RIV-1322 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/21/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 91 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1323 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/22/2014 2014-RIV-1324 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/21/2014 2014-RIV-1326 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/12/2014 2014-RIV-1327 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/4/2014 2014-RIV-1328 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/21/2014 2014-RIV-1329 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/22/2014 2014-RIV-1330 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 11/21/2014 2014-RIV-1331 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/23/2014 2014-RIV-1332 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/20/2014 2014-RIV-1333 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/24/2014 2014-RIV-1334 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/24/2014 2014-RIV-1335 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/27/2014 2014-RIV-1336 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/30/2014 2014-RIV-1337 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/27/2014 2014-RIV-1338 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/27/2014 2014-RIV-1339 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/25/2014 2014-RIV-1340 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/29/2014 2014-RIV-1341 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/3/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 92 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1342 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/30/2014 2014-RIV-1343 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/28/2014 2014-RIV-1344 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/4/2015 2014-RIV-1345 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/24/2015 2014-RIV-1346 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/24/2014 2014-RIV-1347 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/2/2014 2014-RIV-1348 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/30/2014 2014-RIV-1349 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/30/2014 2014-RIV-1350 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/13/2014 2014-RIV-1351 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/4/2015 2014-RIV-1352 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/4/2014 2014-RIV-1353 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/4/2014 2014-RIV-1354 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/4/2014 2014-RIV-1355 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014 2014-RIV-1356 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/18/2014 2014-RIV-1357 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/15/2014 2014-RIV-1358 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/6/2014 2014-RIV-1359 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/2/2014 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 93 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1360 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014 2014-RIV-1361 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014 2014-RIV-1362 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/26/2014 2014-RIV-1363 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014 2014-RIV-1364 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014 2014-RIV-1365 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/10/2015 2014-RIV-1366 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/9/2014 2014-RIV-1367 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/13/2014 2014-RIV-1368 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/11/2014 2014-RIV-1369 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/11/2014 2014-RIV-1370 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/12/2014 2014-RIV-1371 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/16/2014 2014-RIV-1372 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/15/2014 2014-RIV-1373 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/15/2015 2014-RIV-1374 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/20/2014 2014-RIV-1375 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/21/2014 2014-RIV-1376 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/23/2014 2014-RIV-1377 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/18/2015 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 94 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1378 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/20/2014 2014-RIV-1379 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/24/2014 2014-RIV-1380 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/24/2014 2014-RIV-1381 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/25/2014 2014-RIV-1382 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/26/2014 2014-RIV-1383 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/11/2014 2014-RIV-1384 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/21/2014 2014-RIV-1385 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/15/2014 2014-RIV-1386 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/26/2014 2014-RIV-1387 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/17/2015 2014-RIV-1388 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/27/2014 2014-RIV-1389 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014 2014-RIV-1390 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/25/2014 2014-RIV-1392 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/25/2014 2014-RIV-1393 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/25/2015 2014-RIV-1394 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/25/2015 2014-RIV-1395 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/2/2015 2014-RIV-1396 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/4/2015 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 95 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1398 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/3/2015 2014-RIV-1399 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/3/2015 2014-RIV-1400 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/3/2015 2014-RIV-1401 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/16/2014 2014-RIV-1402 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/12/2015 2014-RIV-1403 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/8/2015 2014-RIV-1404 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/22/2014 2014-RIV-1405 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/8/2015 2014-RIV-1406 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/17/2015 2014-RIV-1407 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/10/2015 2014-RIV-1408 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/10/2015 2014-RIV-1409 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/10/2015 2014-RIV-1410 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/9/2014 2014-RIV-1411 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/10/2015 2014-RIV-1412 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/10/2015 2014-RIV-1413 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/18/2015 2014-RIV-1414 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/8/2015 2014-RIV-1415 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/4/2015 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 96 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1416 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/16/2014 2014-RIV-1417 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/16/2015 2014-RIV-1418 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/16/2015 2014-RIV-1419 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/17/2015 2014-RIV-1420 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/17/2015 2014-RIV-1421 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/17/2015 2014-RIV-1423 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/17/2015 2014-RIV-1424 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/19/2014 2014-RIV-1425 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/18/2015 2014-RIV-1426 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/21/2014 2014-RIV-1427 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/24/2015 2014-RIV-1428 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/21/2014 2014-RIV-1429 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/21/2014 2014-RIV-1430 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/22/2014 2014-RIV-1431 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/5/2015 2014-RIV-1432 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/25/2015 2014-RIV-1433 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/25/2015 2014-RIV-1434 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/25/2015 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 97 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1435 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/4/2015 2014-RIV-1436 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/28/2015 2014-RIV-1437 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/26/2015 2014-RIV-1438 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/30/2015 2014-RIV-1439 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/30/2014 2014-RIV-1440 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015 2014-RIV-1441 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/25/2015 2014-RIV-1442 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/25/2015 2014-RIV-1443 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/3/2015 2014-RIV-1444 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 12/24/2014 2014-RIV-1445 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/3/2015 2014-RIV-1446 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/4/2014 2014-RIV-1447 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/22/2015 2014-RIV-1449 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/2/2015 2014-RIV-1451 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/21/2015 2014-RIV-1452 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/4/2015 2014-RIV-1453 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/7/2015 2014-RIV-1455 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/7/2015 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 98 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1456 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015 2014-RIV-1457 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/23/2014 2014-RIV-1458 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015 2014-RIV-1459 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015 2014-RIV-1460 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015 2014-RIV-1461 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/6/2015 2014-RIV-1463 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/8/2015 2014-RIV-1464 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/4/2015 2014-RIV-1466 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/7/2015 2014-RIV-1467 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/7/2014 2014-RIV-1468 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/7/2015 2014-RIV-1470 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/8/2015 2014-RIV-1471 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/8/2015 2014-RIV-1472 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/13/2015 2014-RIV-1473 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/14/2015 2014-RIV-1474 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/14/2015 2014-RIV-1475 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/4/2015 2014-RIV-1476 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/14/2015 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 99 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1477 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/4/2015 2014-RIV-1478 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/4/2015 2014-RIV-1479 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/13/2015 2014-RIV-1480 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/1/2015 2014-RIV-1481 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/14/2015 2014-RIV-1482 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/4/2015 2014-RIV-1483 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/14/2014 2013-RIV-1484 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/20/2015 2014-RIV-1485 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/20/2015 2014-RIV-1486 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/22/2014 2014-RIV-1487 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/28/2015 2014-RIV-1488 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/22/2014 2014-RIV-1489 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/26/2015 2014-RIV-1490 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/26/2015 2014-RIV-1491 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015 2014-RIV-1492 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015 2014-RIV-1493 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015 2014-RIV-1494 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 100 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1495 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/26/2015 2014-RIV-1496 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/25/2015 2014-RIV-1497 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015 2014-RIV-1498 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/19/2014 2014-RIV-1499 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/26/2015 2014-RIV-1500 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/25/2015 2014-RIV-1501 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2014 2014-RIV-1502 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/26/2015 2014-RIV-1503 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015 2014-RIV-1504 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015 2014-RIV-1505 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015 2014-RIV-1506 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015 2014-RIV-1507 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/1/2015 2014-RIV-1508 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/2/2015 2014-RIV-1510 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/1/2015 2014-RIV-1511 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/4/2015 2014-RIV-1512 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/1/2015 2014-RIV-1513 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/1/2015 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 101 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1514 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/22/2015 2014-RIV-1515 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/6/2015 2014-RIV-1516 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015 2014-RIV-1517 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/10/2015 2014-RIV-1518 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015 2014-RIV-1519 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015 2014-RIV-1520 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015 2014-RIV-1521 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/21/2015 2014-RIV-1522 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/12/2015 2014-RIV-1523 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015 2014-RIV-1524 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/4/2015 2014-RIV-1525 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/6/2015 2014-RIV-1526 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/7/2015 2014-RIV-1527 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/1/2015 2014-RIV-1528 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/7/2015 2014-RIV-1529 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015 2014-RIV-1530 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/6/2015 2014-RIV-1533 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/7/2015 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 102 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1534 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/9/2015 2014-RIV-1535 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/7/2015 2014-RIV-1538 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/9/2015 2014-RIV-1539 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/7/2015 2014-RIV-1540 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/12/2015 2014-RIV-1541 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/30/2015 2014-RIV-1542 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/12/2015 2014-RIV-1544 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/1/2015 2014-RIV-1545 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/11/2015 2014-RIV-1546 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/16/2015 2014-RIV-1547 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/12/2015 2014-RIV-1549 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/1/2015 2014-RIV-1550 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/12/2015 2014-RIV-1551 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015 2014-RIV-1552 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015 2014-RIV-1553 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015 2014-RIV-1554 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015 2014-RIV-1555 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 103 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1557 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015 2014-RIV-1558 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015 2014-RIV-1559 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015 2014-RIV-1561 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015 2014-RIV-1563 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015 2014-RIV-1565 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/20/2015 2014-RIV-1568 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015 2014-RIV-1569 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015 2014-RIV-1570 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2014 2014-RIV-1571 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015 2014-RIV-1572 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015 2014-RIV-1573 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/24/2015 2014-RIV-1574 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/2/2015 2014-RIV-1575 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/20/2015 2014-RIV-1576 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/20/2015 2014-RIV-1577 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/23/2015 2014-RIV-1581 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/22/2015 2014-RIV-1582 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/12/2015 Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 104 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1586 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/4/2015 2014-RIV-1587 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/10/2015 2014-RIV-1589 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/19/2015 2014-SAC-54 Grippi, CDDA Hon. White 5/14/2014 5/1/2014 213 2014-SAC-56 Grippi, CDDA Hon. White 8/26/2014 12/24/2014 24 2014-SAC-57 Grippi, CDDA Hon. White 11/18/2014 12/24/2014 39 2014-SAC-59 Grippi, CDDA Hon. White 11/18/2014 12/24/2014 39 2014-SAC-60 Grippi, CDDA Hon. White 11/19/2014 11/18/2014 30 2014-SAC-61 Grippi, CDDA Hon. Savage 12/7/2014 12/24/2014 39 San Bernardino 2014-SBD-538 Roth, ADA Hon. Pace 4/4/2014 2014-SBD-539 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 4/4/2014 2014-SBD-540 Fermin, ADA Hon. Harrison 4/28/2014 2014-SBD-542 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 7/4/2014 2014-SBD-543 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 8/22/2014 9/4/2014 2014-SBD-544 Ramos, DA Hon. Harrison 9/5/2014 9/4/2014 2014-SBD-545 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 8/11/2014 5/30/2014 3 2014-SBD-546 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 8/11/2014 2014-SBD-547 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 8/15/2014 8/11/2014 14 Sacramento 105 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Date of Order for Service of Inventory San Bernardino 2014-SBD-548 (cont’d) Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 8/29/2014 2014-SBD-549 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 9/3/2014 2014-SBD-550 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 9/12/2014 9/4/2014 4 2014-SBD-551 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 9/16/2014 9/4/2014 5 2014-SBD-552 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 10/17/2014 2014-SBD-553 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 11/14/2014 2014-SBD-554 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 10/24/2014 2014-SBD-555 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 11/3/2014 12/19/2014 2 2014-SBD-557 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 11/14/2014 2014-SBD-558 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 12/12/2014 2014-SBD-559 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 1/1/2015 2014-SBD-560 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 12/22/2014 12/17/2014 4 2014-SBD-561 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 2/16/2015 1/7/2015 22 2014-SBD-562 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 1/23/2015 2014-SBD-563 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 2/20/2015 2014-SBD-564 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 2/20/2015 1/7/2015 47 2014-SBD-566 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 3/13/2015 2014-SBD-567 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 2/16/2015 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. 9/4/2014 106 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Date of Order for Service of Inventory San Bernardino 2014-SBD-569 (cont’d) Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 2/25/2015 2014-SBD-570 Ramos, DA Hon. Nakata 3/15/2014 2014-SBD-571 Ramos, DA Hon. Nakata 3/13/2015 2014-SD-180 Hill, ASCA Hon. Rogers 2/20/2015 2014-SD-181 Sherman, ASCA Hon. Danielsen 2/25/2014 2014-SD-182 Tomaski, ASAC Hon. Fraser 2014-SD-183 Sherman, ASAC 2014-SD-185 Reporting Jurisdiction San Diego San Joaquin EICOS No. Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory 8/6/2014 Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 8/6/2014 15 8/5/2014 8/5/2014 151 Hon. Rogers 8/11/2014 8/11/2014 111 Sherman, ASAC Hon. Rogers 8/11/2014 8/11/2014 111 2014-SD-186 Sherman, ASAC Hon. Rogers 8/19/2014 8/19/2014 290 2014-SD-187 Sherman, ASAC Hon. Rogers 8/19/2014 8/19/2014 290 2014-SD-188 Sherman, ASAC Hon. Rogers 8/1/2014 8/19/2014 290 2014-SD-189 Sherman, ASAC Hon. Rogers 8/5/2014 8/5/2014 151 2014-SD-190 Sherman, ASAC Hon. Rogers 8/5/2014 8/5/2014 151 2014-SD-191 Redman, Chief of Police Hon. Rogers 9/4/2014 9/5/2014 64 2014-SD-192 Gore, Sheriff Hon. Fraser 2/26/2015 8/26/2014 2014-SD-193 Gore, Sheriff Hon. Rogers 2/26/2015 8/26/2014 2014-SD-195 Redman, Chief of Police Hon. Rogers 9/4/2014 6/3/2014 9/5/2014 64 2015-SJ-36 Willett, DA Hon. Guiliani 7/2/2014 7/2/2014 107 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application San Joaquin (cont’d) 2015-SJ-37 Willett, DA Hon. Guiliani 9/4/2014 3/1/2014 2015-SJ-38 Willett, DA Hon. Guiliani 9/7/2014 9/7/2014 2015-SJ-39 Willett, DA Hon. Guiliani 9/12/2014 9/12/2014 2015-SJ-40 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 9/18/2014 9/18/2014 2015-SJ-41 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 12/10/2014 12/10/2014 2015-SJ-42 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 11/4/2014 11/14/2014 2015-SJ-43 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 11/28/2014 11/28/2014 2015-SJ-44 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 9/3/2014 9/3/2014 2015-SJ-45 Willett, DA Hon. Guiliani 12/10/2014 12/10/2014 2015-SJ-46 Willett, DA Hon. Guiliani 12/10/2014 12/10/2014 2015-SJ-47 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 12/10/2014 12/10/2014 2015-SJ-48 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 12/19/2014 12/19/2014 2015-SJ-49 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 12/3/2014 12/3/2014 2015-SJ-50 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 12/10/2014 12/10/2014 2015-SJ-51 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 12/10/2014 12/10/2014 2015-SJ-52 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 9/10/2014 9/10/2014 2015-SJ-53 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 12/19/2014 12/19/2014 2014-SBA-46 Dudley, DA Hon. Kelly 1/9/2015 Santa Barbara 0 11/4/2014 108 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Santa Barbara (cont’d) 2014-SBA-47 Dudley, DA Hon. Kelly 9/9/2014 9/9/2014 35 2014-SBA-48 Dudley, DA Hon. Kelly 9/9/2014 9/9/2014 35 2014-SBA-49 Dudley, DA Hon. Kelly 9/9/2014 9/9/2014 35 2014-SCL-71 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett 9/22/2014 9/22/2014 34 2014-SCL-72 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett 9/11/2014 9/11/2014 34 2014-SCL-74 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett 1/12/2015 10/12/2014 2014-SCL-75 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett 1/12/2015 10/12/2014 2014-SCL-76 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett (Inventory due) 5/17/2014 9/22/2014 154 2014-SCL-77 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett (Inventory due) 4/21/2014 9/22/2014 154 2014-SCL-78 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett (Inventory due) 6/1/2014 9/22/2014 154 2014-SCL-79 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett (Inventory due) 7/11/2014 9/22/2014 154 2014-SCL-80 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett (Inventory due) 7/22/2014 9/22/2014 154 2014-SCL-81 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett 1/12/2015 10/12/2014 2014-SCL-82 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett 1/12/2015 10/12/2014 2014-SCL-83 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett 2/28/2015 2014-SCL-84 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett (Inventory due) 12/28/2014 12/4/2014 119 2014-SON-6 Ravitch, DA Hon. Gnoss 11/7/2014 11/25/2014 24 2014-SON-7 Ravitch, DA Hon. Gnoss 5/18/2014 5/5/2014 27 Santa Clara Sonoma 11/20/2014 109 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory 5/7/2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Stanislaus 2014-STA-63 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 8/4/2014 2014-STA-64 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 6/19/2014 2014-STA-65 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 8/4/2014 2014-STA-67 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 7/11/2014 2014-STA-68 Kreis, Agent Hon. Ashley 8/4/2014 2014-STA-69 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 2014-STA-70 Fladager, DA 2014-STA-71 Tulare Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 7/22/2014 14 9/5/2014 2 7/22/2014 12 7/11/2014 45 7/22/2014 9 6/10/2014 9/5/2014 2 Hon. Ashley 11/22/2014 10/8/2014 18 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 11/17/2014 10/8/2014 18 2014-STA-72 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 11/22/2014 10/8/2014 18 2014-STA-73 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 10/27/2014 10/8/2014 18 2014-STA-74 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 10/25/2014 10/8/2014 18 2014-STA-75 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 11/22/2014 10/8/2014 18 2014-STA-76 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 12/31/2014 10/8/2014 18 2014-STA-77 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 12/31/2014 10/8/2014 18 2014-TUL-8 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 1/25/2015 2014-TUL-9 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 1/15/2015 2014-TUL-10 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 1/16/2015 2014-TUL-11 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 9/5/2014 5/7/2014 5/7/2014 110 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Tulare (cont’d) 2014-TUL-12 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 10/30/2014 2014-TUL-13 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 12/17/2014 2014-TUL-14 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 12/11/2014 2014-TUL-15 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 12/11/2014 2014-TUL-16 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 1/16/2015 2014-TUL-18 Underwood, ADA Hon. Ferguson (Inventory due) 11/20/2014 2015-TUL-19 Underwood, ADA Hon. Ferguson (Inventory due) 9/18/2014 2013-VE-74 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce 11/2/2014 8/29/2014 2014-VE-84 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce 1/11/2015 10/17/2014 2014-VE-85 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce 5/8/2014 2014-VE-86 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce (Inventory due) 5/15/2014 2014-VE-87 Maurizi, CADA Hon. Ayers 6/1/2014 2014-VE-88 Totten, DA Hon. O'Neill (Inventory due) 6/13/2014 2014-VE-89 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce 6/18/2014 2014-VE-90 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce (Inventory due) 6/26/2014 3/23/2015 2014-VE-91 Maurizi, CADA Hon. Back (Inventory due) 7/14/2014 4/11/2015 2014-VE-92 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce 6/28/2014 2014-VE-93 Maurizi, CADA Hon. DeNoce (Inventory due) 7/2/2014 Ventura Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 5/7/2014 4/11/2015 5/28/2014 10 6/13/2014 36 5/28/2014 4 4/11/2015 3/31/2015 111 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report Date of Order for Service of Inventory Date Granted for Postponement of Service of Inventory Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of Applicant/Agency Judge Authorizing Application Ventura (cont’d) 2014-VE-94 Maurizi, CADA Hon. O'Neill (Inventory due) 8/12/2014 4/11/2015 2014-VE-95 Totten, DA Hon. Ayers (Inventory due) 9/10/2014 4/11/2015 2014-VE-96 Totten, DA Hon. Back (Inventory due) 9/27/2014 3/20/2015 2014-VE-97 Totten, DA Hon. Ayers (Inventory due) 10/18/2014 4/11/2015 2014-VE-98 Maurizi, CADA Hon. Back (Inventory due) 10/23/2014 2/5/2015 2014-VE-99 Maurizi, CADA Hon. White (Inventory due) 11/19/2014 3/1/2015 2014-VE-100 Maurizi, CADA Hon. Ayers (Inventory due) 11/22/2014 4/11/2015 2014-VE-101 Totten, DA Hon. Back (Inventory due) 12/8/2014 4/3/2014 2014-VE-102 Totten, DA Hon. O'Neill (Inventory due) 11/26/2014 4/11/2015 2014-VE-103 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce (Inventory due) 12/26/2014 3/1/2015 2014-VE-104 Frawley, CDDA Hon. O'Neill 1/27/2015 2014-VE-105 Frawley, CDDA Hon. White 4/13/2015 2014-VE-106 Totten, DA Hon. Back 2/1/2015 2014-VE-109 Totten, DA Hon. White 1/20/2015 2014-VE-110 Totten, DA Hon. Back 2/7/2014 2014-VE-111 Totten, DA Hon. White 2/12/2015 2014-VE-113 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce 3/12/2015 Date of Number Compliance of With Inventory Inventory Notices Order Sent 112 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Alameda 2014-ALA-19 2014-ALA-20 2014-ALA-24 2014-ALA-28 2014-ALA-29 2014-ALA-30 2014-ALA-31 2014-ALA-32 2014-ALA-33 2014-ALA-34 Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used 2 monitors; 1 wire room manager 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager 1 monitor, 1 wire room manager 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager Alameda Total Contra Costa 2014-CO-1 8 investigators El Dorado Total 4 78,000 3,200 81,200 15,600 1,600 17,200 39,000 1,600 40,600 35,200 1,600 36,800 40,300 1,600 41,900 23,400 1,600 25,000 39,000 1,600 40,600 29,900 1,600 31,500 29,900 1,600 31,500 15,600 1,600 17,200 345,900 17,600 363,500 (Personnel + Resource) 4 45,787 6,950 52,737 5,000 5,000 10,000 2014-CC-9 Costs related to CCCDA 14-001 2014-CC-10 Costs related to CCCDA 14-006 2014-CC-11 Costs related to CCCDA 14-006 Contra Costa Total El Dorado Total Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Cost not available 2014-CO-2 2014-CC-8 Resource Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) 50,787 11,950 62,737 2014-ED-1 25 34,935 50 34,985 2014-ED-2 31 36,700 900 37,600 71,635 950 72,585 Totals per electronic wiretap and per county do not delineate between sources of funds (county, state, federal). 113 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Fresno 2014-FR-6 Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Resource Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) 66,125 5,092 2014-FR-7 Costs related to 2013-06 2014-FR-8 Costs related to 2013-06 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 71,217 2014-FR-9 agents; installers; monitors 49,516 1,400 50,916 2014-FR-11 agents; installer; monitor 49,516 1,400 50,916 64,736 1,400 66,136 53,312 1,400 54,712 2014-FR-13 2014-FR-14 agents; installers; monitors agents; installer; monitor 2014-FR-15 agents; install; monitor 64,736 1,400 66,136 2014-FR-16 agents; intaller; monitor 140,896 1,400 142,296 agents; installer, monitor agents; installer; monitors 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 95,200 2,800 98,000 114,240 2,800 117,040 18,925 1,500 20,425 2014-FR-20 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425 2014-FR-21 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425 0 500 500 2014-FR-17 2014-FR-18 2014-FR-19 2014-FR-22 2014-FR-23 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425 2014-FR-24 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425 18,925 1,500 20,425 18,925 1,500 20,425 18,925 1,500 20,425 18,925 1,500 20,425 2014-FR-25 2014-FR-26 2014-FR-27 2014-FR-28 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 114 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Fresno (cont’d) 2014-FR-29 2014-FR-30 2014-FR-31 Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents Fresno Total Kern Total Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) 18,925 1,500 20,425 18,925 1,500 20,425 18,925 1,500 20,425 925,377 37,592 962,969 2013-KE-35 Costs related to 13-07 2013-KE-36 Costs related to 13-07 (Personnel + Resource) 4 2014-KE-37 8 agents 4,000 2,200 6,200 2014-KE-38 11 agents 18,000 1,500 19,500 2014-KE-39 30 federal; contract; state and local 67,000 8,289 75,289 2014-KE-40 Costs related to 14-05 2014-KE-41 Costs related to 14-06 2014-KE-42 Costs related to 14-06 2014-KE-43 Costs related to 14-06 2014-KE-44 Costs related to 14-06 2014-KE-45 16 agents 2014-KE-46 2015-KE-47 20,000 17,000 37,000 Costs related to 14-12 25 detectives 2015-KE-48 Kern Total Resource Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) 15,500 2,200 17,700 Costs related to 14-18 2014-KE-49 4 agents 22,893 1,316 24,209 2014-KE-50 16 detectives 70,980 3,000 73,980 2014-KE-51 Costs related to 14-14 2014-KE-52 Costs related to 14-14 2014-KE-53 Costs related to 14-14 218,373 35,505 253,878 115 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Kings 2014-KI-16 3 monitors; 5 agents; 1 technician 50,000 1,000 51,000 2014-KI-17 1 agent; 1 monitor 300 500 800 50,300 1,500 51,800 29,500 4,000 33,500 11,000 2,000 13,000 0 3,858 3,858 18,000 2,000 20,000 Kings Total Los Angeles 2014-LA-747 2014-LA-748 2014-LA-749 2014-LA-750 4 monitors; 3 detectives; 2 technicians 1 monitor per day Federal $ only 4 monitors per day for first 30 days 2 monitors per day for second 30 days 2 monitors per day state Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 2014-LA-751 2 monitors per day Federal 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-LA-752 2 monitors per day 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-LA-753 4 monitors per day for first 30 days 2 monitors per day for second 30 days 0 3,858 3,858 18,000 2,000 20,000 18,000 2,000 20,000 18,000 2,000 20,000 3,858 0 3,858 36,000 6,000 42,000 18,000 2,000 20,000 11,000 2,000 13,000 2014-LA-754 2014-LA-755 2014-LA-756 2014-LA-757 2014-LA-758 2014-LA-759 2014-LA-760 2 monitors per day federal 2 monitors per day state 4 monitors per day for first 30 days 2 monitors per day for second 30 days 4 monitors per day Federal $ only 2 monitors per day state 1 monitor per day Federal $ only 116 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-761 2014-LA-762 2014-LA-763 2014-LA-764 2014-LA-765 2014-LA-766 2014-LA-768 2014-LA-769 2014-LA-770 2014-LA-771 2014-LA-772 2014-LA-773 2014-LA-774 Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used 1 monitor per day Federal $ only 2 monitors per day Federal 2 monitors per day state 2 monitors per day Federal $ only 2 monitors per day state 2 monitors per day Federal 2 monitors per day Federal $ only 2 monitors per day – Federal 2 monitors per day – state 2 monitors per day Federal 2 monitors per day state 2 monitors per day Federal 2 monitors per day state Resource Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) 11,000 2,000 13,000 18,000 2,000 20,000 18,000 2,000 20,000 22,000 4,000 26,000 76,680 1,700 78,380 18,000 2,000 20,000 22,000 4,000 26,000 52,945 3,900 56,845 25,560 700 26,260 23,000 700 23,700 23,000 700 23,700 18,000 2,000 20,000 23,000 700 23,700 (Personnel + Resource) 4 2014-LA-775 2 monitors per day 24,460 1,100 25,560 2014-LA-776 2 monitors per day state 0 1,286 1,286 18,000 2,000 20,000 22,000 4,000 26,000 25,000 700 25,700 5,136 460 5,596 23,000 700 23,700 2014-LA-777 2014-LA-778 2014-LA-779 2014-LA-780 2014-LA-781 2 monitors per day Federal 2 monitors per day Federal $ only 2 monitors per day state 2 monitors per day Federal 2 monitors per day Federal 117 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-782 2014-LA-783 Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used 2 monitors per day state 2 wiretap monitors per day Resource Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) 2,568 430 2,998 25,000 1,700 26,700 (Personnel + Resource) 4 2013-LA-786 7 per month 105,000 7,500 112,500 2014-LA-787 5 30,000 20,000 50,000 52,945 3,900 56,845 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-LA-788 2014-LAK-2 2 monitors per day – Federal 2 monitors per day Federal 2014-LA-789 2 monitors per day Federal 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-LA-790 7 60,000 5,000 65,000 2014-LA-791 7 35,000 2,500 37,500 2014-LA-792 7 20,000 2,000 22,000 2014-LA-793 2 monitors per day state 25,000 700 25,700 2014-LA-794 2 monitors per day 20,000 2,000 22,000 2014-LA-795 5 monitors 25,000 2,000 27,000 2014-LA-796 7 monitors 35,000 2,500 37,500 2014-LA-797 2 monitors per day state 76,680 1,700 78,380 18,000 2,000 20,000 18,000 2,000 20,000 18,000 2,000 20,000 13-155 2014-LA-800 2014-LA-801 2 monitors per day Federal 2 monitors per day Federal $ only 2 monitors per day state 2014-LA-804 2 monitors per day Federal 18,000 1,100 19,100 2014-LA-805 2 monitors per day Federal 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-LA-806 2 monitors - Federa 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-LA-807 2 monitors per day 24,450 1,600 26,050 118 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-808 2014-LA-809 Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used 2 monitors per day Federal 2 monitors per day Federal Resource Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) 18,000 2,000 20,000 78,548 2,100 80,648 (Personnel + Resource) 4 2014-LA-810 2 monitors per day Federal 52,366 1,400 53,766 2014-LA-811 7 contracted monitors 200,000 15,000 215,000 26,000 2,000 28,000 2014-LA-812 2014-LA-813 2 monitors per day Federal $ only 22,000 4,000 26,000 2014-LA-814 1 installer; 2 monitors 7,458 2,800 10,258 26,000 2,000 28,000 25,000 700 25,700 22,000 4,000 26,000 2014-LA-815 2014-LA-816 2014-LA-817 2 monitors per day state 2 monitors per day Federal $ only 2014-LA-818 2 monitors per day Federal $ only 22,000 4,000 26,000 2014-LA-820 2 monitors per day 26,183 1,600 27,783 2014-LA-821 2014-LA-822 Cost not available 2 wiretap monitors per day 2014-LA-823 2014-LA-824 2 monitors per day 2014-LA-825 78,156 1,760 79,916 75,000 7,500 82,500 25,560 775 26,335 25,000 2,500 27,500 2014-LA-826 2 26,000 600 26,600 2014-LA-827 7 35,000 2,500 37,500 2014-LA-828 2 monitors per day Federal $ only 22,000 4,000 26,000 2014-LAS-6 6,780 2,800 9,580 2014-LA-829 52,000 4,000 56,000 119 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Los Angeles (cont’d) Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Resource Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) 2014-LA-831 26,000 2,000 28,000 2014-LA-832 26,000 600 26,600 (Personnel + Resource) 4 2014-LA-833 4 monitors; 1 technician 90,901 20,000 110,901 2014-LA-834 install; monitor 22,000 1,013 23,013 2014-LA-835 install; monitor 22,000 400 22,400 2014-LA-836 1 installer; 2 monitors 6,780 2,800 9,580 2014-LA-838 2 monitors; 1 techincian 25,691 700 26,391 2014-LA-839 tanslators 26,000 5,000 31,000 2014-LA-840 2 monitors per day state 76,680 1,700 78,380 2014-LA-841 2 monitors 25,691 775 26,466 2014-LA-842 11 47,522 6,170 53,692 2014-LA-843 8 monitors 17,144 535 17,679 2014-LA-844 7 contracted monitors 50,000 1,500 51,500 2014-LA-845 2 monitors per day Federal $ only 22,000 4,000 26,000 2014-LA-847 25,560 2,000 27,560 2014-LA-848 25,560 2,000 27,560 2014-LA-849 51,120 4,000 55,120 2014-LA-850 25,000 2,500 27,500 2014-LA-851 26,182 5,000 31,182 2014-LA-852 26,182 2,500 28,682 2014-LA-853 25,000 5,000 30,000 2014-LA-854 58,000 2,000 60,000 2014-LA-855 60,000 6,000 66,000 120 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Los Angeles (cont’d) Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Resource Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) 2014-LA-856 26,000 2,000 28,000 2014-LA-857 25,000 10,000 35,000 2014-LA-858 75,000 2,500 77,500 2014-LA-859 75,000 5,000 80,000 2014-LA-860 26,000 4,000 30,000 2014-LA-861 50,000 5,000 55,000 2014-LA-862 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-LA-863 25,000 2,500 27,500 2014-LA-864 25,000 5,000 30,000 (Personnel + Resource) 4 2014-LA-866 install; agent monitors; contracts 156,000 7,500 163,500 2014-LA-867 3 officers; 2 monitors; 1 technician 25,560 2,000 27,560 26,000 2,000 28,000 2014-LA-868 2014-LA-869 4 48,000 6,000 54,000 2014-LA-870 2 monitors 25,000 2,000 27,000 2014-LAS-7 install; monitors; contracts 156,000 15,500 171,500 2014-LA-871 2 monitors per day 22,000 4,000 26,000 25,000 1,500 26,500 2014-LAS-8 2014-LA-872 2 monitors per day 28,000 1,013 29,013 2014-LA-873 2 monitors per day for 30 days 26,183 2,000 28,183 2014-LA-874 1 install; 2 monitors 27,000 2,000 29,000 37,800 5,000 42,800 18,900 2,500 21,400 2014-LA-876 2014-LA-877 8 officers; 0 monitors; 1 technician 8 officers, 0 monitors; 1 technician 121 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-878 Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) 156,000 13,000 169,000 25,560 2,000 27,560 2014-LA-880 26,000 600 26,600 2014-LA-881 6,000 1,700 7,700 2014-LA-879 install; agent monitors; contracts 3 officers; 2 monitors; 1 techincian 2014-LA-883 2014-LA-884 2014-MAD-5 2014-MAD-7 2014-MAD-8 2014-MAD-9 2014-MAD-10 2014-MAD-12 2014-MAD-13 2014-MAD-15 2 monitors day - state 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors Madera Total Merced 2014-MER-27 16 monitors; 25 agents Merced Total Napa 2014-NA-1 bilingual investigators; wire room supervisor Napa Total Orange 2014-OR-86 (Personnel + Resource) 4 Cost not available Los Angeles Total Madera Total Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) 17 sworn personnel acting as monitors and technicians 18,000 2,000 20,000 4,278,849 401,533 4,680,382 0 3,000 3,000 0 3,000 3,000 0 3,000 3,000 0 3,000 3,000 0 3,000 3,000 0 3,000 3,000 0 3,000 3,000 0 3,000 3,000 0 24,000 24,000 77,921 0 77,921 77,921 0 77,921 8,200 800 9,000 8,200 800 9,000 36,105 15,652 51,757 122 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Orange (cont’d) 2014-OR-87 20 police officers 10,546 6,200 16,746 2014-OR-88 20 police officers 9,228 6,200 15,428 55,879 28,052 83,931 15,000 2,500 17,500 Orange Total Placer 2014-PLA-3 3 monitors in 10 hour shifts pool of 20 monitors 1 technician 2 agents 2014-PLA-4 (Personnel + Resource) 4 Costs related to 2014-PLA-3 Placer Total Riverside Total Cost ($) 15,000 2,500 2013-RIV-899 Cost not available 2013-RIV-902 Cost not available 2013-RIV-904 Cost not available 2013-RIV-905 Cost not available 17,500 2013-RIV-906 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 24,708 643 25,351 2013-RIV-911 6 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000 2013-RIV-915 Cost not available 2013-RIV-916 2 monitors 40,378 1,200 41,578 2013-RIV-922 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 25,440 642 26,082 2013-RIV-925 2 monitors 18,000 4,000 22,000 2013-RIV-926 Cost not available 2013-RIV-927 Cost not available 2013-RIV-928 1 installer; 3 monitors 2013-RIV-929 26,052 1,600 27,652 Cost not available 2013-RIV-930 1 agent; 2 monitors 62,000 2,500 64,500 2013-RIV-931 1 agent; 2 monitors 62,000 2,500 64,500 123 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2013-RIV-932 2 monitors 40,154 1,700 2013-RIV-933 Cost not available 2013-RIV-934 Cost not available 2013-RIV-935 4 monitors 2013-RIV-936 36,000 4,000 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 41,854 40,000 Cost not available 2013-RIV-937 2 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000 2013-RIV-938 1 officer; 4 monitors; 1 technician 49,416 1,929 51,345 2013-RIV-939 Cost not available 2013-RIV-940 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2013-RIV-941 2 installers and 4 monitors 78,677 2,825 81,502 2013-RIV-942 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 22,152 643 22,795 2013-RIV-943 8 persons used re installation, monitoring and transcript preparation 81,360 4,500 85,860 2013-RIV-944 2 monitors 20,000 2,000 22,000 2013-RIV-945 2 monitors 20,000 2,000 22,000 2013-RIV-946 2 monitors 24,450 1,100 25,550 2013-RIV-947 Cost not available 2013-RIV-948 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2013-RIV-949 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2013-RIV-950 2 monitors 26,000 725 26,725 2013-RIV-951 2 monitors 26,000 700 26,700 2013-RIV-952 2 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000 2013-RIV-954 Cost not available 124 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Riverside (cont’d) 2013-RIV-955 Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Resource Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 Cost not available 2013-RIV-956 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 0 643 643 2014-RIV-957 2 monitors 42,863 1,700 44,563 2014-RIV-958 2 monitors 24,400 1,100 25,500 2014-RIV-959 2 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000 2014-RIV-960 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-961 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-962 8 persons used re installation, monitoring and transcript preparation 160,000 18,000 178,000 2014-RIV-963 4 monitors 80,000 8,000 88,000 2014-RIV-964 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-965 4 monitors 44,000 3,600 47,600 2014-RIV-966 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 25,560 1,286 26,846 2014-RIV-967 2 monitors 51,120 2,400 53,520 2014-RIV-968 2 monitors; 1 interpreter 5,964 2,500 8,464 2014-RIV-969 4 monitors 48,900 2,200 51,100 2014-RIV-970 2 monitors 26,000 725 26,725 2014-RIV-971 2 Spanish monitors 22,000 1,400 23,400 2014-RIV-972 Cost not available 2014-RIV-973 Cost not available 2014-RIV-974 Cost not available 2014-RIV-975 2 monitors 118,133 12,500 130,633 2014-RIV-976 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 125 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-977 2 monitors 25,560 1,200 26,760 2014-RIV-980 2 monitors 24,500 1,100 25,600 2014-RIV-981 2 monitors 17,040 1,500 18,540 2014-RIV-982 2 monitors 20,000 2,000 22,000 2014-RIV-983 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-984 2 monitors 24,211 2,600 26,811 2014-RIV-985 2 monitors and 1 technician 26,052 1,600 27,652 2014-RIV-986 Cost not available 2014-RIV-987 Cost not available 2014-RIV-988 Cost not available Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 2014-RIV-989 2 monitors 25,000 1,000 26,000 2014-RIV-990 2 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000 2014-RIV-991 10 persons used re installation, monitoring and transcript preparation 103,360 6,000 109,360 2014-RIV-992 4 monitors per day 49,100 2,200 51,300 2014-RIV-993 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; and 1 technician 25,560 1,284 26,844 2014-RIV-994 2 monitors 25,560 7,500 33,060 2014-RIV-995 2 monitors 20,947 800 21,747 2014-RIV-996 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 17,040 643 17,683 2013-RIV-997 2 monitors 26,153 1,200 27,353 2014-RIV-998 2 Spanish monitors 44,000 2,800 46,800 2014-RIV-999 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; and 1 technician 230,040 13,750 243,790 126 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1000 2014-RIV-1001 Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Resource Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 Cost not available 2 monitors 25,560 1,500 2014-RIV-1002 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1003 Cost not available 27,060 2014-RIV-1004 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1005 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1006 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1007 2 monitors 5,112 1,200 6,312 2014-RIV-1008 1 agent; 2 monitors 15,000 1,500 16,500 26,183 2,000 28,183 28,627 2,870 31,497 2014-RIV-1009 2014-RIV-1010 1 officer; 4 monitors and 1 technician 8 persons used re installation and monitoring 2014-RIV-1011 3 monitors 60,000 6,000 66,000 2014-RIV-1012 4 monitors 40,000 4,000 44,000 2014-RIV-1013 2014-RIV-1014 Cost not available 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 2014-RIV-1016 5,112 643 5,755 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1017 2 monitors 3,333 1,000 4,333 2014-RIV-1018 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1019 2 monitors 20,000 2,000 22,000 2014-RIV-1020 2 monitors 22,000 1,800 23,800 2014-RIV-1021 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1022 2 Spanish monitors 44,000 2,800 46,800 2014-RIV-1023 4 monitors 51,120 1,580 52,700 127 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1024 2 monitors 26,183 1,700 27,883 2014-RIV-1025 2 monitors 0 1,500 1,500 2014-RIV-1026 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1027 4 monitors 36,240 1,200 37,440 2014-RIV-1028 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1029 2 monitors 25,560 1,500 27,060 2014-RIV-1030 4 monitors 41,004 1,290 42,294 2014-RIV-1031 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1032 4 monitors 69,228 0 69,228 120,000 12,000 132,000 25,560 1,286 26,846 2014-RIV-1033 2014-RIV-1034 6 persons used re installation, monitoring and transcript preparation 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; and 1 technician 2014-RIV-1035 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1036 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1037 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1039 6 persons used re installation, monitoring and transcript preparation 12,000 12,000 24,000 2014-RIV-1040 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1041 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1042 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; and 1 technician 0 643 643 2014-RIV-1043 2 monitors 10,400 1,000 11,400 2014-RIV-1044 Cost not available 128 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1045 2 monitors 18,000 4,000 22,000 2013-RIV-1046 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1047 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1048 2 monitors 15,560 790 16,350 153,360 3,000 156,360 26,051 3,200 29,251 2014-RIV-1049 2014-RIV-1050 2 metropolitan translators 3 monitors and 1 technician Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 2014-RIV-1051 2 Spanish monitors 26,051 2,800 28,851 2014-RIV-1052 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1053 2 monitors 96,000 5,400 101,400 2014-RIV-1054 2 monitors 35,000 3,000 38,000 2014-RIV-1055 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1056 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1057 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1058 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1059 8 officers; 0 monitors; and 1 technician 18,900 2,500 21,400 2014-RIV-1060 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1061 2 monitors 24,450 1,100 25,550 2014-RIV-1062 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1063 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1064 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1065 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1066 2014-RIV-1067 Cost not available 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 129 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1068 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; and 1 technician 51,120 1,929 2014-RIV-1070 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 53,049 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1071 2 Spanish monitors 44,000 2,800 46,800 2014-RIV-1072 2 monitors 4,620 2,300 6,920 2014-RIV-1073 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1074 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1075 2 monitors and 1 agent 2014-RIV-1076 2014-RIV-1078 8,348 2,600 10,948 Cost not available 2 monitors 2014-RIV-1079 36,000 4,000 40,000 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1080 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2013-RIV-1081 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1082 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1083 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1084 2 monitors 102,240 5,000 107,240 2014-RIV-1085 2 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000 2014-RIV-1086 1 officer; 6 monitors; and 1 technician 85,200 2,582 87,782 2014-RIV-1087 2 monitors 2,300 0 2,300 2014-RIV-1088 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1089 1 officer; 4 civilian monitors; 1 technician 51,120 1,284 52,404 2014-RIV-1090 2 monitors 44,000 3,600 47,600 2014-RIV-1091 2 translators 51,120 4,200 55,320 2014-RIV-1092 2 monitors 65,827 2,400 68,227 130 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1093 2 monitors 25,560 1,500 27,060 2014-RIV-1094 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1095 6 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000 2014-RIV-1096 2 monitors 96,000 14,400 110,400 2014-RIV-1097 2 Spanish monitors 26,051 2,800 28,851 2014-RIV-1098 2 monitors 26,000 2,500 28,500 2014-RIV-1099 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1100 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1101 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1102 1 officer; 4 civilian monitors; 1 technician 51,120 1,286 52,406 2014-RIV-1103 3 DEA special agents; 7 TFOs; and 2 monitors 125,400 2,000 127,400 2014-RIV-1104 2 monitors 14,707 25,560 40,267 2014-RIV-1106 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1108 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1109 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1110 7 civilian monitors 133,966 9,350 143,316 2014-RIV-1111 12 persons used re installation, monitoring and transcript preparation 42,000 1,000 43,000 2014-RIV-1112 2 monitors per day 22,000 4,000 26,000 2014-RIV-1113 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1114 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1115 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1116 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 131 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1117 2 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000 2014-RIV-1118 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1119 2014-RIV-1120 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 Cost not available 2 monitors 2014-RIV-1121 1,870 2,500 4,370 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1122 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1123 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1124 2 monitors 12,080 700 12,780 2014-RIV-1125 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1127 8 monitors 144,000 16,000 160,000 2014-RIV-1128 2 monitors 14,707 25,560 40,267 2014-RIV-1129 2 monitors per day 24,000 500 24,500 2014-RIV-1130 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; and 1 technician 52,364 1,286 53,650 2014-RIV-1131 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2013-RIV-1132 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1133 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1134 2 monitors 14,707 51,120 65,827 2013-RIV-1135 6 monitors 76,680 4,800 81,480 2014-RIV-1136 5 monitors 45,000 70,000 115,000 2014-RIV-1137 2014-RIV-1138 Cost not available 2 monitors 2014-RIV-1139 2014-RIV-1141 52,000 1,450 53,450 Cost not available 4 monitors 36,240 1,200 37,440 132 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1142 2 monitors 26,000 1,700 2014-RIV-1143 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1144 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1145 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 2014-RIV-1146 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1148 Cost not available Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 27,700 20,000 2014-RIV-1149 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1150 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1151 2 monitors 11,928 1,000 12,928 2014-RIV-1152 4 monitors 4,027 2,600 6,627 2014-RIV-1153 2 monitors 22,000 1,400 23,400 2014-RIV-1154 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; and 1 technician 68,280 1,929 70,209 2014-RIV-1155 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1156 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1157 2 monitors per day 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1158 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1160 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1161 3 monitors 852 580 1,432 2014-RIV-1162 1 officer; 6 civilian monitors; and 1 technician 43,600 2,029 45,629 2014-RIV-1163 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1164 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1165 2 monitors 14,707 51,120 65,827 133 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1166 2014-RIV-1167 Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; 1 technician 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; and 1 technician 2014-RIV-1168 2014-RIV-1169 Resource Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) 8,520 643 9,163 52,364 1,286 53,650 (Personnel + Resource) 4 Cost not available 2 translators/monitors 2014-RIV-1170 25,560 3,900 29,460 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1171 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1172 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1173 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1174 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1175 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1176 2 monitors 96,000 1,000 97,000 2013-RIV-1177 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1178 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1179 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1180 2014-RIV-1181 Cost not available 2 monitors 2014-RIV-1182 2014-RIV-1183 28,624 2,600 31,224 Cost not available 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; 1 technician 2014-RIV-1184 25,560 643 26,203 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1185 2 monitors 26,000 4,000 30,000 2014-RIV-1186 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 134 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction Riverside (cont’d) Resource Cost ($) EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) 2014-RIV-1187 12 persons used to coordinate monitoring, installation and transcript preparation 42,000 1,000 43,000 2014-RIV-1188 2 monitors 115,020 12,400 127,420 2014-RIV-1190 6 monitors 124,761 10,650 135,411 2014-RIV-1191 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1192 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1193 2 monitors 25,691 775 26,466 2014-RIV-1194 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 5,964 643 6,607 35,784 1,286 37,070 2014-RIV-1195 2014-RIV-1196 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; and 1 technician 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 2014-RIV-1197 2 monitors 44,000 3,600 47,600 2014-RIV-1198 2 monitors 52,000 5,000 57,000 2014-RIV-1199 1 monitor per day 14,000 2,500 16,500 2014-RIV-1200 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1201 6 persons used re installation, monitoring and transcript preparation 67,500 70,000 137,500 2014-RIV-1202 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 34,080 1,286 35,366 2014-RIV-1203 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 0 643 643 2014-RIV-1204 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1205 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1206 30 persons used re installation, monitoring and transcript preparation 18,000 2,000 20,000 135 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1207 2 monitors 22,000 1,400 23,400 2014-RIV-1208 1 officer; 4 civilian monitors; and 1 technician 51,120 1,286 52,406 2014-RIV-1209 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1210 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1211 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1212 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1213 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1214 10 officers 94,500 12,500 107,000 2014-RIV-1215 6 monitors 52,100 2,400 54,500 2014-RIV-1216 3 monitors 30,312 2,000 32,312 2014-RIV-1217 1 officer, 2 monitors and 1 tech 25,560 1,286 26,846 2014-RIV-1218 2 monitors 48,000 2,800 50,800 2014-RIV-1219 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1220 16 persons used re installation, monitoring and transcript preparation 144,000 16,000 160,000 2014-RIV-1221 2 monitors 26,000 2,500 28,500 2014-RIV-1222 2 monitors 24,450 2,000 26,450 2014-RIV-1223 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1224 2 monitors 96,000 16,000 112,000 2014-RIV-1225 2 monitors 10,052 2,600 12,652 2014-RIV-1226 2 monitors 44,000 3,600 47,600 2014-RIV-1227 2014-RIV-1229 Cost not available 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 136 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1231 4 monitors 67,500 37,500 105,000 2014-RIV-1232 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; and 1 technician 7,668 643 8,311 2014-RIV-1233 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1234 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1235 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1236 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1237 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1238 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1239 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1240 12 persons used re installation, monitoring and transcript preparation 315,763 1,600 317,363 2014-RIV-1241 2 monitors 24,000 5,500 29,500 2014-RIV-1242 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1243 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1244 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1245 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1246 2014-RIV-1247 Cost not available 2 monitors 2014-RIV-1248 18,000 2,000 20,000 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1249 6 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000 2014-RIV-1250 2 monitors 37,800 5,000 42,800 2014-RIV-1251 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1252 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 137 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1253 2 investigators and 2 monitors 7,000 2,000 9,000 2014-RIV-1254 8 civilian monitors 124,761 9,375 134,136 2014-RIV-1255 1 officer; 2 monitors; 1 technician 25,560 643 26,203 2014-RIV-1256 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1257 2 monitors 22,249 2,000 24,249 2014-RIV-1258 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1259 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1260 Cost not available Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 2014-RIV-1261 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1262 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 0 643 643 2014-RIV-1263 2 monitors 115,020 15,000 130,020 2014-RIV-1264 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1265 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1266 2 monitors 2014-RIV-1267 18,000 2,000 20,000 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1268 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1269 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1270 2 monitors 21,300 1,500 22,800 2014-RIV-1271 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1272 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1273 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1275 6 monitors 52,100 2,400 54,500 2014-RIV-1276 1 officer; 4 monitors; 1 technician 41,648 1,286 42,934 2014-RIV-1277 5 monitors 90,000 40,000 130,000 138 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1278 1 install; 2 monitors 60,000 5,000 2014-RIV-1280 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 65,000 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1281 2 monitors 14,707 51,120 65,827 2014-RIV-1282 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1283 2 monitors 24,550 1,100 25,650 2014-RIV-1284 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1285 2 monitors 96,000 1,800 97,800 2014-RIV-1286 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1287 4 monitors 51,380 700 52,080 2014-RIV-1288 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1289 12 persons used re installation, monitoring and transcript preparation 108,000 12,000 120,000 2014-RIV-1290 6 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000 2014-RIV-1291 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1292 2014-RIV-1293 Cost not available 2 monitors 2014-RIV-1294 24,450 1,100 25,550 Cost not available 2013-RIV-1295 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1296 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1297 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1298 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1299 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1300 10 officers 37,800 5,000 42,800 2014-RIV-1301 Cost not available 139 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1302 1 officer; 3 civilian monitors; and 1 technician 59,580 3,815 63,395 2014-RIV-1303 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1304 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1305 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1306 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1307 1 monitor 10,000 2,000 12,000 2014-RIV-1308 2014-RIV-1309 Cost not available 2 monitors/interpreters 115,020 15,000 2014-RIV-1310 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1311 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1312 Cost not available 130,020 2014-RIV-1313 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1315 2 monitors 26,182 700 26,882 2014-RIV-1316 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1317 7 persons used re installation, monitoring and transcript preparation 133,480 9,375 142,855 2014-RIV-1319 2 monitors 17,300 2,400 19,700 2014-RIV-1320 4 monitors 51,120 2,400 53,520 2014-RIV-1321 1 officer and 1 technician 0 643 643 2014-RIV-1322 2 monitors 51,000 2,200 53,200 2014-RIV-1323 2014-RIV-1324 2014-RIV-1326 Cost not available 4 monitors per day 51,120 5,000 56,120 Cost not available 140 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1327 0 0 2,500 2014-RIV-1328 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 2,500 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1329 2 monitors 24,000 9,600 33,600 2014-RIV-1330 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; 1 techinican 25,560 643 26,203 2014-RIV-1331 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1332 2 monitors 44,000 3,600 47,600 2014-RIV-1333 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1334 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1335 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1336 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1337 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1338 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1339 10 officers 37,800 5,000 42,800 2014-RIV-1340 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1341 2 monitors 22,000 1,400 23,400 2014-RIV-1342 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1343 4 monitors 51,120 2,400 53,520 2014-RIV-1344 1 officer; 4 monitors;and 1 technician 76,680 3,858 80,538 2014-RIV-1345 2 monitors 22,698 5,000 27,698 2014-RIV-1346 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1347 2014-RIV-1348 2014-RIV-1349 Cost not available 7 persons used re installation and monitoring 25,936 2,460 28,396 Cost not available 141 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1350 Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Resource Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1351 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1352 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1353 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1354 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1355 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1356 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1357 2 monitors 8,520 1,200 9,720 2014-RIV-1358 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1359 1 monitor 0 2,500 2,500 2014-RIV-1360 2 monitors 30,482 1,700 32,182 2014-RIV-1361 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1362 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; 1 technician 17,040 1,286 18,326 2014-RIV-1363 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; and 1 technician 25,560 1,286 26,846 2014-RIV-1364 7 persons used re installation, monitoring and transcript preparation. 157,500 10,000 167,500 2014-RIV-1365 2 monitors 2,500 32,000 34,500 2014-RIV-1366 1 officer; 4 monitors; and 1 technician 25,560 2,000 27,560 2014-RIV-1367 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1368 Costs related to R1-13-0168 2014-RIV-1369 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1370 2 monitors 25,560 1,600 27,160 2014-RIV-1371 4 monitors per day 52,364 2,300 54,664 142 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1372 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1373 2 monitors 48,000 3,200 51,200 2014-RIV-1374 2 monitors/translators 102,240 15,000 117,240 2014-RIV-1375 2 Spanish monitors 44,000 2,800 46,800 2014-RIV-1376 6 civilian monitors 87,416 10,200 97,616 2014-RIV-1377 2 monitors 49,100 3,200 52,300 2014-RIV-1378 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1379 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1380 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1381 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1382 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1383 2 monitors 13,891 775 14,666 2014-RIV-1384 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1385 Cost not available Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 2014-RIV-1386 2 monitors per day 25,560 1,600 27,160 2014-RIV-1387 2 monitors 44,000 3,600 47,600 2014-RIV-1388 2 monitors 65,000 2,500 67,500 2014-RIV-1389 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1390 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1392 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1393 4 monitors 3,600 4,000 7,600 2014-RIV-1394 2014-RIV-1395 2014-RIV-1396 Cost not available 2 Spanish monitors 22,000 1,400 23,400 Cost not available 143 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1398 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1399 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1400 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1401 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1402 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1403 4 monitors 2014-RIV-1404 39,028 2,400 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 41,428 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1405 1 officer; 4 civilian monitors;and 1 technician 50,880 1,286 52,166 2014-RIV-1406 2 monitors 60,378 6,800 67,178 2014-RIV-1407 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1408 1 monitor and 1 supervisor 18,144 2,500 20,644 2014-RIV-1409 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1410 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1411 1 monitor per day 2,000 14,000 16,000 2014-RIV-1412 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1413 6 monitors 60,000 4,500 64,500 2014-RIV-1414 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1415 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1416 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1417 2 monitors 25,691 876 26,567 2014-RIV-1418 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1419 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1420 Cost not available 144 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1421 2 monitors 28,724 5,950 2014-RIV-1423 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 34,674 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1424 2 contract linguists 41,894 1,120 43,014 2014-RIV-1425 2 monitors and installers 25,000 2,000 27,000 2014-RIV-1426 2 monitors/interpreters 76,680 15,000 91,680 2014-RIV-1427 2 Spanish monitors 66,000 5,400 71,400 2014-RIV-1428 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1429 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1430 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1431 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1432 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1433 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1434 2 monitors 13,608 2,500 16,108 2014-RIV-1435 6 monitors 4,942 300 5,242 2014-RIV-1436 6 monitors 117,500 5,000 122,500 2014-RIV-1437 2 monitors 24,550 625 25,175 2014-RIV-1438 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1439 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1440 1 monitor; 1 supervisor 27,216 2,026 29,242 2014-RIV-1441 2 monitors 16,200 2,500 18,700 2014-RIV-1442 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1443 1 monitor 0 2,500 2,500 2014-RIV-1444 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 1,704 643 2,347 145 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1445 1 officer; 2 monitors; 1 technician 8,520 643 9,163 2014-RIV-1446 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1447 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1449 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1451 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1452 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1453 2 monitors 11,901 1,750 13,651 2014-RIV-1455 6 monitors 100,000 7,050 107,050 2014-RIV-1456 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1457 3 monitors 11,076 930 12,006 2014-RIV-1458 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1459 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1460 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1461 2 monitors 1,200 25,560 26,760 2014-RIV-1463 2 monitors 26,182 1,700 27,882 2014-RIV-1464 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1466 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1467 2 monitors 25,691 775 26,466 2014-RIV-1468 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1470 2 monitors 26,183 700 26,883 2014-RIV-1471 2 monitors 24,000 1,600 25,600 2014-RIV-1472 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1473 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1474 2 Spanish monitors 66,000 5,400 71,400 146 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1475 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1476 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1477 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1478 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1479 Cost not available Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 2014-RIV-1480 2 monitors 14,484 1,800 16,284 2014-RIV-1481 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1482 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1483 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2013-RIV-1484 1 officer; 4 monitors; and 1 technician 51,120 1,929 53,049 2014-RIV-1485 2 monitors 25,691 1,775 27,466 2014-RIV-1486 2 monitors 104,252 22,500 126,752 2014-RIV-1487 6 monitors 76,680 7,800 84,480 2014-RIV-1488 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1489 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1490 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1491 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1492 4 monitors 74,124 6,750 80,874 2014-RIV-1493 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1494 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1495 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1496 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1497 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1498 5 monitors 26,412 1,810 28,222 147 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1499 1 officer; 2 monitors; 1 technician 25,560 643 26,203 3,100 36,229 2014-RIV-1500 2014-RIV-1501 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 Cost not available 2 monitors 2014-RIV-1502 33,129 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1503 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1504 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1505 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1506 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1507 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1508 4 monitors 86,560 4,325 90,885 2014-RIV-1510 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1511 2 monitors 26,183 700 26,883 2014-RIV-1512 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1513 2 monitors; 1 installer 60,000 6,000 66,000 2014-RIV-1514 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000 2014-RIV-1515 6 monitors 76,680 3,600 80,280 2014-RIV-1516 2 monitors 26,182 2,600 28,782 2014-RIV-1517 1 officer; 2 monitors; 1 technician 25,560 643 26,203 2014-RIV-1518 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1519 4 monitors 49,100 3,300 52,400 2014-RIV-1520 8 monitors 72,000 8,000 80,000 2014-RIV-1521 2 monitors 6,983 2,500 9,483 2014-RIV-1522 5 monitors 35,784 2,020 37,804 2014-RIV-1523 2 monitors 26,782 1,600 28,382 148 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1524 Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Resource Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1525 2 monitors 44,000 3,600 47,600 2014-RIV-1526 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1527 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1528 3 monitors 25,560 1,600 27,160 2014-RIV-1529 2 monitors 25,891 876 26,767 5,400 71,400 2014-RIV-1530 2014-RIV-1533 Cost not available 2 monitors 2014-RIV-1534 66,000 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1535 2 monitors 24,550 1,100 25,650 2014-RIV-1538 2 monitors 24,000 3,200 27,200 2014-RIV-1539 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1540 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1541 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 42,600 1,286 43,886 2014-RIV-1542 2 monitors 11,000 2,300 13,300 2014-RIV-1544 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1545 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1546 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1547 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1549 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1550 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1551 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1552 2014-RIV-1553 Cost not available 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 149 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1554 Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1555 5 monitors 60,131 5,800 65,931 2014-RIV-1557 1 monitor 26,051 825 26,876 2014-RIV-1558 4 monitors 123,540 6,700 130,240 2014-RIV-1559 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1561 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1563 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1565 1 DEA agent; 2 wire monitors 28,624 2,600 31,224 2014-RIV-1568 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1569 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1570 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1571 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1572 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-RIV-1573 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1574 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1575 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1576 2 monitors 2014-RIV-1577 2014-RIV-1581 2014-RIV-1586 2 monitors 22,500 127,252 18,000 2,000 20,000 Cost not available 2 monitors 2014-RIV-1587 2014-RIV-1589 104,752 Cost not available 2014-RIV-1582 Riverside Total Resource Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) 18,000 2,000 20,000 Cost not available 2 monitors 26,690 700 27,390 16,295,999 1,876,999 18,172,998 150 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Sacramento 2014-SAC-54 35 detectives, patrol, civilian staff 52,402 6,431 58,833 2014-SAC-56 5 detectives, monitors 22,650 572 23,222 2014-SAC-57 25 detectives and translators 127,000 21,000 148,000 2014-SAC-59 2014-SAC-60 (Personnel + Resource) 4 Costs related to WT-14-04 25 detectives 2014-SAC-61 95,000 15,000 110,000 Costs related to WT-14-04 Sacramento Total San Bernardino Total Cost ($) 297,052 43,003 340,055 2014-SBD-538 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-SBD-539 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-SBD-540 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-SBD-542 1 officer; 1 monitor 70,000 2,000 72,000 2014-SBD-543 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-SBD-544 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-SBD-545 4 monitors 66,700 5,400 72,100 2014-SBD-546 1 officer; 1 monitor 140,000 4,000 144,000 2014-SBD-547 2 officers; 2 monitors 67,007 2,100 69,107 2014-SBD-548 2 officers; 4 monitors 84,000 2,000 86,000 2014-SBD-549 2 officers; 2 monitors 56,000 2,000 58,000 2014-SBD-550 1 officer; 2 monitors; 1 technician 17,040 7,643 24,683 2014-SBD-551 13 officers 43,920 5,000 48,920 2014-SBD-552 1 officer; 2 monitors 70,000 4,000 74,000 2014-SBD-553 1 officer; 4 monitors 300,000 12,000 312,000 2014-SBD-554 1 officer; 3 monitors 95,000 6,000 101,000 2014-SBD-555 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 151 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) San Bernardino (cont’d) 2014-SBD-557 1 officer; 2 monitors 70,000 6,000 76,000 2014-SBD-558 1 officer, 2 monitors 70,000 4,000 74,000 2014-SBD-559 1 officer; 1 monitor 50,000 2,000 52,000 2014-SBD-560 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-SBD-561 6 officers; 2 technicians 38,640 1,000 39,640 60,312 2,000 62,312 2014-SBD-562 (Personnel + Resource) 4 2014-SBD-563 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-SBD-564 6 officers 38,640 1,000 39,640 2014-SBD-566 16 officers 50,000 10,000 60,000 2014-SBD-567 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-SBD-569 16 officers 50,000 30,000 80,000 2014-SBD-570 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000 2014-SBD-571 16 officers 50,000 40,000 90,000 1,667,259 168,143 1,835,402 25,500 250 25,750 65,867 13,550 79,417 San Bernardino Total San Diego Total Cost ($) 2014-SD-180 2014-SD-181 translation, monitoring service 1-4 monitors/8 hr shift x 2 shifts/day 2014-SD-182 Costs related to 14-12 (Eicos 2014-SD-190) 2014-SD-183 Costs related to 14-07 (Eicos 2014-SD-185) 2014-SD-185 2 monitors per day 27,000 600 27,600 2014-SD-186 8 linguists 54,646 3,391 58,037 2014-SD-187 2014-SD-188 2014-SD-189 Costs related to 14-13 (Eicos 2014-SD-188) 8 linguists 54,646 3,391 58,037 Costs related to 14-12 (Eicos 2014-SD-182) 152 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) San Diego (cont’d) 2014-SD-190 average of 4 monitors at two 8 hour shifts/day 81,647 4,768 86,415 2014-SD-191 20 police officers 70,956 1,474 72,430 2014-SD-192 5 monitors; 7 linguists 197,476 4,270 201,746 2014-SD-193 Costs related to 14-04 (Eicos 2014-SD-192) 2014-SD-195 Costs related to 14-11 (Eicos 2014-SD-191) San Diego Total San Joaquin 577,738 2015-SJ-36 Cost not available 2015-SJ-37 Cost not available 2015-SJ-38 Cost not available 2015-SJ-39 Cost not available 2015-SJ-40 Cost not available 2015-SJ-41 Cost not available 2015-SJ-42 Cost not available 2015-SJ-43 Cost not available 2015-SJ-44 Cost not available 2015-SJ-45 Cost not available 2015-SJ-46 San Joaquin Total 31,694 88,000 4,000 2015-SJ-47 Cost not available 2015-SJ-48 Cost not available 2015-SJ-49 Cost not available 2015-SJ-50 Cost not available 2015-SJ-51 Cost not available 2015-SJ-52 Cost not available 2015-SJ-53 Cost not available 88,000 4,000 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 609,432 92,000 92,000 153 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Santa Barbara 2014-SBA-46 7 monitors; 1 technician 35,504 2,520 38,024 2014-SBA-47 30,000 0 30,000 2014-SBA-48 9,000 0 9,000 2014-SBA-49 12,384 0 12,384 86,888 2,520 89,408 237,000 4,968 241,968 Santa Barbara Total Santa Clara 2014-SCL-71 monitors and switch costs 2014-SCL-72 2014-SCL-74 4 monitors 22,554 3,159 25,713 2014-SCL-75 2 monitors 11,554 1,284 12,838 2014-SCL-76 Costs related to WT 14-07 2014-SCL-77 Costs related to WT 14-07 2014-SCL-78 Costs related to WT 14-07 2014-SCL-79 Costs related to WT 14-07 2014-SCL-80 2 monitors a day; 16 monitors total 65,424 6,560 71,984 2014-SCL-81 4 monitors 22,894 625 23,519 2014-SCL-82 2 monitors 11,894 625 12,519 2014-SCL-83 4 monitors 22,894 1,284 24,178 2014-SCL-84 installation and 17 law enforcement officers monitoring wire 275,000 15,000 290,000 669,214 33,505 702,719 2014-SON-6 2014-SON-7 Cost not available 16 deputies; 2 HIDA agents Sonoma Total Stanislaus (Personnel + Resource) 4 Costs related to WT 14-01 Santa Clara Total Sonoma Total Cost ($) 2014-STA-63 2 monitors per day 0 2,000 2,000 0 2,000 2,000 22,000 1,500 23,500 154 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Stanislaus (cont’d) 2014-STA-64 3 monitors 5,040 1,000 6,040 2014-STA-65 2 monitors per day 44,000 1,500 45,500 2014-STA-67 5 monitors per day 44,000 7,000 51,000 2014-STA-68 2 monitors per day 22,000 1,500 23,500 2014-STA-69 monitors 14,678 300 14,978 2014-STA-70 3 monitors 44,000 3,000 47,000 2014-STA-71 Costs related to 14-08 2014-STA-72 Costs related to 14-08 2014-STA-73 Costs related to 14-08 2014-STA-74 Costs related to 14-08 2014-STA-75 Costs related to 14-08 2014-STA-76 Costs related to 14-08 2014-STA-77 Costs related to 14-08 Stanislaus Total Tulare 2014-TUL-8 2014-TUL-9 2014-TUL-10 2014-TUL-11 2014-TUL-12 2014-TUL-13 2014-TUL-14 2014-TUL-15 wire, monitor, and manpower costs wire, monitor, and manpower costs wire, monitor, and manpower costs wire, monitor, and manpower costs wire, monitor, and manpower costs wire, monitor, and manpower costs wire, monitor, and manpower costs wire, monitor, manpower costs Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 195,718 15,800 211,518 20,000 22,569 42,569 20,000 22,569 42,569 20,000 22,569 42,569 20,000 22,569 42,569 40,000 35,138 75,138 20,000 22,893 42,893 20,000 22,569 42,569 20,000 22,569 42,569 155 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Tulare (cont’d) 2014-TUL-16 2014-TUL-18 2015-TUL-19 Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used wire, monitor, manpower costs surveillance teams, conduit monitors install, monitor, and prepare transcripts Tulare Total Ventura Resource Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) 20,000 22,569 42,569 213,700 6,000 219,700 43,600 3,000 46,600 457,300 225,014 682,314 (Personnel + Resource) 4 2013-VE-74 2 monitors 39,948 2,262 42,210 2014-VE-84 9 88,000 14,750 102,750 2014-VE-85 2 monitors 61,271 2,200 63,471 66,000 13,250 79,250 2014-VE-86 2014-VE-87 2 monitors 10,331 402 10,733 2014-VE-88 4 monitors 44,000 4,500 48,500 2014-VE-89 2 monitors 47,351 1,094 48,445 2014-VE-90 2 monitors; 1 technician 6,500 2,500 9,000 2014-VE-91 4 monitors 44,000 6,500 50,500 2014-VE-92 1 monitor 6,390 2,925 9,315 2014-VE-93 1 monitor; 1 transcriptionist; 1 installer 5,869 3,575 9,444 2014-VE-94 5 95,000 11,000 106,000 2014-VE-95 15 322,000 26,400 348,400 2014-VE-96 35 monitoring detectives 98,000 4,000 102,000 2014-VE-97 10 144,000 18,600 162,600 2014-VE-98 11 monitors; 1 technician; 1 transcriptionist 0 18,736 18,736 2014-VE-99 4 monitors 4,500 8,000 12,500 2014-VE-100 6 92,000 6,000 98,000 156 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 Resource Cost ($) Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Nature and Quantity of Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($) (Installation Fees, Supplies, Equipment, etc.) Ventura (cont’d) 2014-VE-101 multiple monitors and interpreters. 60,156 3,850 64,006 2014-VE-102 4 46,000 2,400 48,400 2014-VE-103 5 monitors 12,000 12,500 24,500 2014-VE-104 2 monitors 24,500 2,800 27,300 2014-VE-105 4 monitors; 6 detectives 78,000 1,200 79,200 45,000 0 45,000 2014-VE-106 Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource) 4 2014-VE-109 2 monitors 500 600 1,100 2014-VE-110 4 monitors 26,258 1,400 27,658 2014-VE-111 1 monitor; 3 transcriptionists 26,000 1,500 27,500 2014-VE-113 3 monitors; 1 technician 25,597 3,992 29,589 Ventura Total 1,519,171 176,936 1,696,107 Total (all reporting counties) 27,952,560 3,141,596 31,094,156 157 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 7 Jurisdiction Reporting No Electronic Interception Activity During Calendar Year 2014 Alpine Marin Santa Cruz Amador Mariposa Shasta Butte Mendocino Sierra Calaveras Modoc Siskiyou Colusa Mono Solano Del Norte Monterey Sutter Glenn Nevada Tehama Humboldt Plumas Trinity Imperial San Benito Tuolumne Inyo San Francisco Yolo Lake San Luis Obispo Yuba Lassen San Mateo 158 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 8 Summary of Supplemental Reports for Interceptions Conducted in Prior Years 2014 Contra Costa 2009 2013 2/5/2013 6/3/2013 2013 Pending Granted 13-02 Offense(s) 13-02 Cost ($) 1 Offense(s) 2013 EICOS No. Number Alameda Reference No. Number Reporting Report Date of Jurisdiction Year Application Denied Motions to Persons Convicted Suppress Persons Arrested 4 Conspiracy; unlawful firearm possession 1 Firearms; gangs 1 Narcotics 13 Gangs; firearms; conspiracy 3 narcotics and firearms 3 Narcotics and firearms 0 0 3 7 Kern 2013 13-05 3 USC 841(a) and 846 3 USC 841(a) and 846 Los Angeles 2006 06-126 4 Conspiracy; possession for sales of cocaine 1 Possession for sales of cocaine 2006 06-191, 06-230, 06241, 06-255, 07-04, 07-23, 07-33, 07-133, 07-132, 07-136, 07179, 10 Attempted murder; conspiracy 10 Attempted murder; conspiracy 6 Narcotics 1 2008 2/22/2008 08-31 8 Narcotics 2009 6/3/2009 09-87 3 Narcotics; conspiracy 1 5 3 Narcotics; conspiracy 2009 7/21/2009 09-114 3 Narcotics; conspiracy 1 5 3 Narcotics; conspiracy 2009 9/2/2009 09-151 3 Narcotics; conspiracy 1 5 3 Narcotics; conspiracy 2009 9/24/2009 09-168 3 Narcotics; conspiracy 1 5 3 Narcotics; conspiracy 2009 10/14/2009 09-183 3 Narcotics; conspiracy 1 5 3 Narcotics; conspiracy 2009 09-152, 10-218, 1010, 10-23 1 Murder 1 1 Murder 2009 09-152 1 1 1 Murder 2009 09-27, 09-39 1 1 1 Murder Murder 159 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 8 Summary of Supplemental Reports for Interceptions Conducted in Prior Years 2014 Motions to Persons Convicted Suppress Cost ($) Narcotics; conspiracy Murder; conspiracy 1 1 Murder; conspiracy 4 Murder; assault 1 3 Murder, assault 10-61 1 Murder 1 1 Murder 3 Narcotics 3 2010 10-188 3 2010 10-184 2010 Pending 3 10-226, 11-24 Denied 1 2010 Granted Offense(s) EICOS No. Number Los Angeles (cont’d) Reference No. Number Reporting Report Date of Jurisdiction Year Application Offense(s) Persons Arrested 2011 9/8/2011 11-11 3 Conspiracy; narcotics 2011 10/13/2011 11-155 3 Conspiracy; naroctics 2 Conspiracy; naroctics 2011 5/11/2011 11-79 1 Narcotics 1 Narcotics 2011 11/7/2011 11-196 3 Conspiracy; naroctics 2 Narcotics 2011 9/1/2011 11-162 5 Conspiracy; naroctics 1 Narcotics 2011 1/2/2011 11-44 1 Narcotics; weapons 1 Narcotics; weapons 2011 9/29/2011 11-191 4 Narcotics; conspiracy Narcotics; conspiracy 2011 6/1/2011 11-117 1 Narcotics; conspiracy Narcotics; conspiracy 11-49 4 Cnspiracy; possession for sales of cocaine 11-152, 11-178, 4 Narcotics trafficking 2011 2011 8/2/2011 2011 11-30 1 Murder; accessory 1 1 1 4 Conspiracy; possession for sales of cocaine 1 Accessory after the fact 1 Murder; accessory 2012 4/13/2012 12-50 2 Narcotics 2 Narcotics 2012 7/20/2012 12-115 4 Narcotics 4 Narcotics 160 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 8 Summary of Supplemental Reports for Interceptions Conducted in Prior Years 2014 Motions to Persons Convicted Suppress Persons Arrested 12-78 2 Conspiracy; narcotics 2 Narcotics 2012 1/13/2012 12-05 2 Narcotics 1 Narcotics 2012 1/1/2012 SW-2012-0088 2 Narcotics trafficking 2 Narcotics trafficking 2012 12-72 4 Conspiracy; possession for sales of methamphetamine 1 Conspiracy 2012 12-23, 12-45, 12-45 Ext 1, 12-52, 12-68 3 Burglary 1 3 Burglary 2012 12-64 2 Murder 1 2 Murder 2012 10-02 1 Murder 1 1 Conspiracy 2012 12-74 2 Murder; attempted murder 1 2 Murder; attempted murder 2012 12-74 1 Murder 1 1 Murder Pending 7/27/2012 Denied 2012 Granted Offense(s) Cost ($) Number EICOS No. Offense(s) Los Angeles (cont’d) Reference No. Number Reporting Report Date of Jurisdiction Year Application 2013 2/8/2013 13-14 3 Narcotics 3 Narcotics 2013 2/7/2013 13-16 5 Narcotics 3 Narcotics; firearm 2013 3/4/2013 13-25 2 Narcotics; conspiracy 1 Narcotics; conspiracy 2013 5/3/2013 13-76 2 Narcotics; conspiracy 1 Narcotics; conspiracy 2013 1/2/2014 SW-2012-013 1 Narcotics trafficking 1 Narcotics trafficking 1 Assault 2013 13-162 1 Attempted murder 1 2014 10/31/2012 12-265 1 Narcotics 1 Narcotics 2014 6/11/2010 10-125 2 Narcotics 2 Narcotics 161 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 8 Summary of Supplemental Reports for Interceptions Conducted in Prior Years 2014 Motions to Persons Convicted Suppress Persons Arrested Offense(s) 1 Narcotics 1 Narcotics 2014 5/4/2011 11-66 2 Narcotics 2 Narcotics 2014 4/18/2014 14-44 1 Narcotics 1 Narcotics 2014 4/14/2014 14-41 1 Narcotics trafficking 1 Narcotics trafficking 7 Narcotics 1 Narcotics 7 Narcotics trafficking 6 Narcotics trafficking 2 Murder; kidnapping 2014 Sonoma 5/15/2013 13-126 (Riverside) 0 1 Pending 12-135 Denied 8/21/2012 Granted 2014 2014 San Diego Cost ($) Number EICOS No. Offense(s) Los Angeles (cont’d) Reference No. Number Reporting Report Date of Jurisdiction Year Application 1 2009 07-68, 07-70, 07-73 2012 12-10, 12-16, 12-22 2012SD-137 1 Narcotics 2012 12-19, 12-24 2012SD-149 1 Narcotics and gangs 2012 11-42, 11-44, 12-05, 12-08, 12-18, 12-20, 12-25, 12-28, 12-31 2012SD-159 2 Narcotics 2013 13-14 2013SD-171 2 Voluntary manslaughter 0 0 2014 8/14/2014 1 Murder 0 0 0 0 162 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 9 List of Electronic Interception Orders Approved But Never Used or Installed Calendar Year 2014 Electronic Interception Orders Approved and Installed But Never Used Electronic Interception Orders Approved But Never Installed 2014-FR-10 13-05 (Alameda) 2014-FR-12 2014-LA-785 2014-LA-837 2014-LA-846 2014-LA-865 2014-LA-875 2014-RIV1509 2014-MAD-11 2014-SAC-55 2014-MAD-14 2014-SAC-58 2014-RIV-978 2014-SBD-541 2014-RIV-979 2014-SBD-556 2014-RIV-1015 2014-RIV-1038 2014-RIV-1069 2014-RIV-1077 2014-RIV-1105 2014-RIV-1107 2014-RIV-1126 2014-RIV-1140 2014-RIV-1147 2014-RIV-1159 2014-RIV-1189 2014-RIV-1228 2014-RIV-1230 2014-RIV-1274 163 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Table 9 List of Electronic Interception Orders Approved But Never Used or Installed Calendar Year 2014 Electronic Interception Orders Approved and Installed But Never Used Electronic Interception Orders Approved But Never Installed 2014-RIV-1279 2014-RIV-1314 2014-RIV-1325 2014-RIV-1448 2014-RIV-1462 2014-RIV-1560 2014-SD-194 164 California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014 Appendix A: Penal Code section 629.62 “Report by Attorney General” (a) The Attorney General shall prepare and submit an annual report to the Legislature, the Judicial Council, and the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts on interceptions conducted under the authority of this chapter during the preceding year. Information for this report shall be provided to the Attorney General by any prosecutorial agency seeking an order pursuant to this chapter. (b) The report shall include all of the following data: (1) The number of orders or extensions applied for. (2) The kinds of orders or extensions applied for. (3) The fact that the order or extension was granted as applied for, was modified, or was denied. (4) The number of wire or electronic communication devices that are the subject of each order granted. (5) The period of interceptions authorized by the order, and the number and duration of any extensions of the order. (6) The offense specified in the order or application, or extension of an order. (7) The identity of the applying law enforcement officer and agency making the application and the person authorizing the application. (8) The nature of the facilities from which or the place where communications were to be intercepted. (9) A general description of the interceptions made under the order or extension, including (A) the number of persons whose communications were intercepted, (B) the number of communications intercepted, (c) the percentage of other communications intercepted, and (d) the approximate nature, amount, and cost of the manpower and other resources used in the interceptions. (10) The number of arrests resulting from interceptions made under the order or extension, and the offenses for which arrests were made. (11) The number of trials resulting from the interceptions. (12) The number of motions to suppress made with respect to the interceptions, and the number granted or denied. (13) The number of convictions resulting from the interceptions and the offenses for which the convictions were obtained and a general assessment of the importance of the interceptions. (14) Except with regard to the initial report required by this section, the information required by paragraphs (9) to (13), inclusive, with respect to orders or extensions obtained in a preceding calendar year. (15) The date of the order for service of inventory made pursuant to Section 629.68, confirmation of compliance with the order, and the number of notices sent. (16) Other data that the Legislature, the Judicial Council, or the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall require. (c) The annual report shall be filed no later than April of each year, and shall also include a summary analysis of the data reported pursuant to subdivision (b). The Attorney General may issue regulations prescribing the content and form of the reports required to be filed pursuant to this section by any prosecutorial agency seeking an order to intercept wire or electronic communications. (d) The Attorney General shall, upon the request of an individual making an application, provide any information known to him or her as a result of these reporting requirements that would enable the individual making an application to comply with paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 629.50. 165