NO. 416?81913?20?15 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT vs, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS WARREN KENNETH PAXTON, JR. 416TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER ON FIRST APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AS THE STATUTE IS NOT ONE UNDER WHICH PAXTON CAN BE CHARGED On the 1st day of December, 2015, the Court heard the Defendant?s First Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus as the Statute Is Not One Under Which Paxton Can Be Charged. The Court, having considered the evidence, arguments of counsel, and applicable case law, finds the allegations in the Defendant's First Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus as the Statute Is Not One Under Which Paxton Can Be Charged to be without merit. It is thereby ORDERED that the Defendant's First Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus as the Statute IS Not One Under Which Paxton Can Be Charged be DENIED. SIGNED this 12th day of December, 2015. MSW JUDGE PRESIDING I NO. 416-81913-2015 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT vs, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS 416TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT WARREN KENNETH PAXTON, JR. ORDER ON SECOND APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BASED ON OFFENSE CHARGE BEING UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VAGUE On the 1st day of December, 2015, the Court heard the Defendant's Second Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Based on Offense Charge Being Unconstitutionally Vague. The Court, having considered the evidence, arguments of counsel, and applicable case law, finds the allegations in the Defendant's Second Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Based on Offense Charge Being Unconstitutionally Vague to be without merit. It is thereby ORDERED that the Defendant's Second Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Based on Offense Charge Being Unconstitutionally Vague be SIGNED this 12th day of December, 2015. JUDGE ESIDING NO. 416-81913-2015 NO. 416-82148-2015 NO. 416?82149?2015 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT VS, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS WARREN KENNETH PAXTON, JR. 416TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER ON THIRD APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BASED UPON IMPROPER IMPANELMENT OF GRAND JURY On the let day of December, 2015. the Court heard the Defendant's Third Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Based Upon Improper lmpanelment of Grand Jury. The Court, having considered the evidence, arguments of counsel, and applicable case law, finds the allegations in the Defendant's Third Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Based Upon Improper lmpanelment of Grand Jury to be without merit. It is thereby ORDERED that the Defendant?s Third Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Based Upon ImprOper lmpanelment of Grand Jury be DENIED. SIGNED this 12th day of December, 2015. JUDGE ESIDING NO. 416-81913?2015 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT vs, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS WARREN KENNETH PAXTON, JR. 416TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER ON FOURTH APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BASED UPON THE LANGUAGE IN THE INDICTMENT RELATING TO THE OFFENSE IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OVERBROAD AND VAGUE On the let day of December, 2015, the Court heard the Defendant's Fourth Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Based Upon the Language in the Indictment Relating to the Offense is Unconstitutionally Overbroad and Vague. The Court, having considered the evidence, arguments of counsel, and applicable case law, finds the allegations in the Defendant?s Fourth Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Based Upon the Language in the Indictment Relating to the Offense is Unconstitutionally Overbroad and Vague to be without merit. It is thereby ORDERED that the Defendant?s Fourth Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Based Upon the Language in the Indictment Relating to the Offense is Unconstitutionally Overbroad and Vague be DENIED. SIGNED this 12th day of December, 2015. JUDGE ESIDING NO. 416-81913?2015 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT vs, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT WARREN KENNETH PAXTON, JR. ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH INDICTMENT FOR FAILURE TO COMMENCE PROSECUTION WITHIN THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS On the 1st day of December, 2015, the Court heard the Defendant?s Motion to Quash Indictment for Failure to Commence Prosecution Within the Statute of Limitations. The Court, having considered the evidence, arguments of counsel, and applicable case law, finds the allegations in the Defendant's Motion to Quash Indictment for Failure to Commence Prosecution Within the Statute of Limitations to be without merit. It is thereby ORDERED that the Defendants Motion to Quash Indictment for Failure to Commence Prosecution Within the Statute of Limitations be DENIED. SIGNED this 12?? day of December, 2015. JUDGE ESIDING NO. 416?81913?2015 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT vs, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS WARREN KENNETH PAXTON, JR. JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH INDICTMENT NO. 416-81913-2015 FOR FAILURE TO GIVE ADEQUATE NOTICE OF SPECIFIC CHARGES AND FOR FAILURE TO STATE AN OFFENSE On the ?Ist day of December, 2015, the Court heard the Defendant?s Motion to Quash Indictment NO. 416-81913-2015 for Failure to Give Adequate Notice of Specific Charges and for Failure to State an Offense. The Court, having considered the evidence, arguments of counsel, and applicable case law, finds the allegations in the Defendant?s Motion to Quash Indictment No. 416?81913-2015 for Failure to Give Adequate Notice of Specific Charges and for Failure to State an Offense to be without merit. It is thereby ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Quash Indictment No. 416-81913? 2015 for Failure to Give Adequate Notice of Specific Charges and for Failure to State an Offense be DENIED. SIGNED this 12th day Of December, 2015. JUDGE ESIDING NO. 416?82148?2015 NO. 4?16-82149?2015 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT vs, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS WARREN KENNETH PAXTON, JR. 416? JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH INDICTMENTS NO. 416-82148-2015 AND NO. 416-82149-2015 FOR FAILURE TO GIVE ADEQUATE NOTICEOF SPECIFIC CHARGES AND FOR FAILURE TO STATE OFFENSES On the Ist day of December, 2015, the Court heard the Defendant's Motion to Quash Indictment No. 416?82148?2015 and No. 416-82149-2015 for Failure to Give Adequate Notice of Specific Charges and for Failure to State Offenses. The Court, having considered the evidence, arguments of counsel, and applicable case law, finds the allegations in the Defendant's Motion to Quash Indictment No. 416-82148-2015 and No. 416?82149?2015 for Failure to Give Adequate Notice of Specific Charges and for Failure to State Offenses to be without merit. It is thereby ORDERED that the Defendant?s Motion to Quash Indictment No. 416-82148-2015 and No. 416-82149-2015 for Failure to Give Adequate Notice of Specific Charges and for Failure to State Offenses be DENIED. SIGNED this 12th day of December, 2015. JUDGE ESIDING NO. 416-81913-2015 NO. 416-82148?2015 NO. 416-82149-2015 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT vs, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS WARREN KENNETH PAXTON, JR. JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH INDICTMENTS BECAUSE OF ATTORNEY DISCLOSURE OF GRAND JURY INFORMATION AND VIOLATION OF GRAND JURY SECRECY On the Ist day of December, 2015, the Court heard the Defendant's Motion to Quash Indictments Because of Attorney Pro?Tem's Disclosure of Grand Jury Information and Violation of Grand Jury Secrecy. The Court, having considered the evidence, arguments of counsel, and applicable case law, finds the allegations in the Defendant?s Motion to Quash Indictments Because of Attorney Pro?Tem?s Disclosure of Grand Jury Information and Violation of Grand Jury Secrecy to be without merit. It is thereby ORDERED that the Defendant?s Motion to Quash Indictments Because of Attorney Pro- Tem?s Disclosure of Grand Jury Information and Violation of Grand Jury Secrecy be DENIED. SIGNED this 12?? day of December, 2015. JUDGE SIDING NO. 416?81913-2015 NO. 416-82148?2015 NO. 416?82149?2015 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT vs, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS WARREN KENNETH PAXTON, JR. JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH INDICTMENTS AS PROSECUTION IS IMPROPERLY BROUGHT On the Ist day Of December, 2015, the Court heard the Defendant?s Motion to Quash Indictments As Prosecution is Improperly Brought. The Court, having considered the evidence, arguments Of counsel, and applicable case law, finds the allegations in the Defendant's Motion to Quash Indictments As Prosecution is ImprOperIy Brought to be without merit. It is thereby ORDERED that the Defendant?s Motion to Quash Indictments As Prosecution is Improperly Brought be DENIED. SIGNED this 12th day of December, 2015. JUDGE ESIDING NO. 416-81913?2015 NO. 416-82148-2015 NO. 416821492015 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT VS, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS WARREN KENNETH PAXTON, JR. 416TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH INDICTMENTS BECAUSE JUDGE CUMULATIVE ACTIONS COMPROMISED THE INTEGRITY OF THE INDICTMENT PROCESS On the 1st day of December, 2015, the Court heard the Defendant?s Motion to Quash Indictments Because Judge Oldner's Cumulative Actions Compromised the Integrity of the Indictment Process. The Court. having considered the evidence, arguments of counsel, and applicable case law, finds the allegationS in the Defendant?s Motion to Quash Indictments Because Judge Oldner's Cumulative Actions Compromised the Integrity of the Indictment Process to be without merit. It is thereby ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Quash Indictments Because Judge Oldner?s Cumulative Actions Compromised the Integrity of the Indictment Process be DENIED. SIGNED this 12th day of December, 2015. JUDGE ESIDING NO. 416-81913-2015 NO. 416?82148?2015 NO. 416?82149?2015 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT V31 COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS 416TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT WARREN KENNETH PAXTON, JR. ORDER ON PETITION TO DISCLOSE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS On the 1st day of December, 2015, the Court heard the Defendant?s Petition to Disclose Grand Jury Proceedings. The Court, having considered the evidence, arguments of counsel, and applicable case law, finds the requested discovery of the testimony of any witnesses who testified before the Grand Jury, if any, should be GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that the State of Texas shall have any and all testimony of any witness who testified in person before the Grand Jury be transcribed. The State of Texas shall not release this testimony to Counsel for the Defendant until the Court finalizes further discovery releases in a subsequent order of the Court. Any further relief requested in this Motion is hereby DENIED. SIGNED this ?12th day of December, 2015. JUDGE ESIDING NO. 416-81913-2015 NO. 416?82148-2015 NO. 416?82149?2015 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT vs, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT WARREN KENNETH PAXTON, JR. ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ADDITIONAL PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS On the day of December, 2015, the Court heard the Defendant?s Motion for Leave to File Additional Pre-Trial Motions. The Court, having considered the evidence, arguments of counsel, and applicable case law, finds the allegations in the Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Additional Pre-Trial Motions to be with merit. It is thereby ORDERED that the Defendant?s Motion for Leave to File Additional Pre-Trial Motions is hereby GRANTED. SIGNED this 12?? day of December, 2015. JUDGE ESIDING