SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Dec?14?2015 3:09 pm Case Number: Filing Date: Dec?14-2015 3:09 Filed by: AUDREY HUIE Juke Box: 001 Image: 05195030 ORDER COALITION FOR FAIR, LEGAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSI et al VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, A MUNICIPAL et al (CEQ 001005195030 Instructions: 'Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned. Stgg?tgiitigaal) DEC 14 2015 CLE FTH OURT BY: Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO COALITION FOR FAIR, LEGAL AND, ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSIT, et a1. Petitioners and Plaintiffs, vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Respondents and Defendants. SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY, et a1. ReallParties in Interest and Defendants. GENENTECH, INC., 91? al., Defendants?Intervenors. I Coalition for Fair, Legal and Environmental Transit, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et a1. Case No. CGC-11-515542 Order Denying Defendants? Motion for Judgment Case No. CPF-14-513627 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ,23' 24 25 Trial in this mandamus action commenced, and concluded, on November 13, 2015. After Plaintiffs and Petitioners Coalition for Fair Legal and Environmental Transit, Service Employees International Union, Local 1021, Sara'Shortt and Elizabeth Alexander (collectively ??Plaintiffs?) presented their case in full and rested, Defendant and Respondent City and County of San Francisco and Dlefendant- Intervenors Genentech, Inc., Apple Inc. and Google Inc. (collectively ?Defendants?) moved for judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 631.8 (the Defendants? Motion was made on the ground that Plaintiffs failed to present evidence of their standing to sue; Plaintiffs opposed the motion. The Court directed the parties to submit simultaneous briefs by December 4, 2015, and to address the arguments raised on the issue of standing. Having fully considered the matter, the Court rules as follows: The Motion for Judgment is DENIED. The parties are further directed to ?le their respective proposed ruling on the issue of preemption simultaneously by close of business, January 22, 2016. The submissions shall be no longer than 15 pages and electronically mailed in Word format to ContestAsbestosTR@sftc.org. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 14, 2015 - 7 GARRETT L. WONG JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Coalition for Fair, Legal and Environmental Transit, et v. City and County of San Francisco, et (11. Case No. CGC-11-515542 Order Denying Defendants? Motion for Judgment Superior Court of California County of San Francisco Coalition for Fair, Legal and, Case Number: CPF-14-5 13627 CERTIFICATE or MAILING (CCP 1013a Environmental Transit, et a1. Petitioners, .: vs. City COunty of San Francisco, et al., Respondents. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, et a1. Real Parties Defendants. Genentech, Inc'. Defendants?Intervenors. I, Audrey Huie, a Deputy Clerk of the Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, certify that I am not a party to the within action. On December 14, 2015 I served the attached Order Denying Defendants? Motion for udgment by placing a copy thereof in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows: Rebecca Davis, Esq. Richard T. Drury, Esq. LOZEAU DRURY, LLP 410-12?h Street, Ste. 250 Oakland, CA 94607 Christopher Carr, Esq. Navi S. Dhillon, Esq. MORRISON FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 William M. Sloan, Esq. Daniel GershWin, Esq. Sarita Venkat, Esq. MORRISON FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 Audrey William Pearson, Deputy City Attorney Wayne K. Snodgrass, Deputy City Attorney OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY City County of San Francisco City Hall, Rm. 234 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102?46 82 David H. Blackwell, Esq. ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY NATSIS LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4074 and, I then placed the sealed envelopes in the outgoing mail at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA. 94102 on the date indicated above for collection, attachment of required prepaid postage, and mailing On that date following standard court practices. Dated: December 14, 2015 Clerk of the Court By: Audrey Huie, Clerk