?yll - . Center for Collegiate Mental Health Acknowledgements The 2015 Annual Report was made possible by: ➤ Collaborative efforts of over 340 university and college counseling centers ➤ Association for University and College Counseling Center Directors (AUCCCD) ➤ Titanium Software, Inc. ➤ van Ameringen Foundation ➤ The American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP) ➤ Penn State University’s Student Affairs CCMH Research Team at Penn State University E X E C U T I V E D I R E C TO R : Ben Locke, Ph.D.—Associate Director of Clinical Services, Counseling and Psychological Services PROJECT MANAGER: Ashley Stauffer, M.S. COUNSELING AND P SYC H O LO G I C A L S E RV I C E S : Aki Kawamoto, Ph.D.—Staff Psychologist & Assessment Coordinator Andres Perez Rojas, Ph.D.—Post Doctoral Fellow Allison Lockard, M.A.—Psychology Intern Brett Scofield, Ph.D.—Assistant Director, Research and Technology Desiree Howell, Ph.D.—Staff Psychologist Kristin Hogan, Psy.D.—Post Doctoral Fellow Paul Carswell, M.A., Ed.S, LPC—Staff Clinician Shannan Smith-Janik, Ph.D.—Staff Psychologist & Practicum Coordinator Ted Bartholomew, M.A.—Psychology Intern D E PA R T M E N T O F E D U C AT I O N A L P S Y C H O L O G Y, C O U N S E L I N G , A N D S P E C I A L E D U C AT I O N : Professors of Counseling Psychology Allison Flemming, Ph.D. Carlos Zalaquett, Ph.D. Diandra Prescod, Ph.D. Kathleen Bieschke, Ph.D. Katie Kostohryz, Ph.D. Jeffrey A. Hayes, Ph.D. SeriaShia Chatters, Ph.D. Wendy Coduti, Ph.D. D E PA R T M E N T O F P S Y C H O LO G Y: Professor of Clinical Psychology Louis G. Castonguay, Ph.D. Doctoral Students in Clinical Psychology Dever Carney, B.A. Rebecca Janis, B.S. Soo Jeong Youn, M.S. Henry Xiao, B.A. ST U D E NT A F FA I R S R E S E A R C H A N D A S S E S S M E N T: CCMH Advisory Board Members (2015) Rob Davies, Ph.D.—Assistant Director, University of Utah Counseling Center Dennis Heitzmann, Ph.D.—(ex-officio)—Director, Counseling and Psychological Services, Penn State University Nathaniel Hopkins, Ph.D.—Staff Psychologist, Coordinator for Information and Systems, University of Kentucky Counseling Center Shelly Lear, Ph.D.—Director of Counseling and Student Wellness, Hobart and William Smith Colleges Brian Mistler, Ph.D.—Associate Dean of Students and Director of Health Services, Ringling College of Art and Design Ariella Soffer, Ph.D.—Intake Coordinator, Counseling and Wellness Services, Hunter College Curtis Wiseley, Psy.D.—Director of Counseling Services, School of Professional Counseling, Lindsey Wilson College Cynthia Cook, Ph.D.—Executive Director of Counseling, Health, and Career Services, University of Houston– Clear Lake Adam Christensen, Ph.D.—Director Megan Nyce, B.A.—Graduate Assistant Ya-Chi Hung, M.A.—Graduate Assistant Michelle Cooper, Ph.D.—Clinical Director, Counseling and Psychological Services, Western Carolina University OFFICE OF PLANNING AND I N S T I T U T I O N A L A S S E S S M E N T: University of Southern California Student Counseling Services Alexander Yin, Ph.D.—Senior Planning and David Reetz, Ph.D. (AUCCCD liaison)—Director, Aurora University Counseling Services Research Associate Carolyn HeitzmannRuhf, Ph.D.— Staff Psychologist, Ryan Weatherford, Ph.D.—Professor and Staff Psychologist, Counseling and Psychological Services, West Chester University N E W M E M B E R S I N 2 01 4 : Ellie Olson, Ph.D.—Director of Counseling Services, Simpson College John Achter, Ph.D.—Director of Counseling and EAP, University of Wisconsin, Stout Richard Tyler-Walker, Ph.D.—Assistant Director/Training Director, North Carolina State University Recommended Citation Center for Collegiate Mental Health. (2016, January). 2015 Annual Report (Publication No. STA 15-108). This publication is available in alternative media on request. Penn State is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer, and is committed to providing employment opportunities to all qualified applicants without regard to race, color, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability or protected veteran status. U.Ed. STA 15-108 MPC136556 Table of Contents 1 CCMH: Bringing Science and Practice Together — Introduction and Orientation 1 Standardized Data Set (SDS) and the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS) 1 CCMH Data Navigator 2 2015 Report Highlights 3 Discussion of 2015 Highlights 4 2014-2015 Publications and Presentations 5 Mental Health Trends 6 CCAPS Trends 7 Changes in Counseling Center Utilization from 2009–2010 to 2014–2015 9 Counseling Center Resource Utilization by Students 9 Average Number of Attended Individual Sessions 9 Impact of “Threat to Self” History on Appointment Usage 10 Standardized Data Set (SDS) 10 Clinician Index of Client Concerns (CLICC) 11 CLICC – “Check all that apply” 12 CLICC – “Top-most concern” 13 Client Demographic Information 18 Mental Health History Items 30 Provider Data 31 Center Information 32 Institutional Data 32 CCMH Member Institutions CCMH: Bringing Science and Practice Together INTRODUCTION AND ORIENTATION College student mental health received widespread attention during the 2014-2015 academic year with indepth commentary appearing in numerous major media outlets. These articles examined college student mental health from various perspectives including the experiences of students and parents, counseling centers, the rise of anxiety in higher education, suicide prevention, and even the role of mental health in campus tragedies. Each of these articles raised a predictable set of questions: “Is the demand for mental health services really growing?”, “Are students really more distressed?”, “How are students more distressed?”, and of course, “Why?” While it can be tempting to pursue quick answers that complement a headline, the frank reality is that the mental health of our college students is multi-faceted, multimodal, and complexly embedded in overlapping macro/ micro cultures; there is no simple answer. However, this year’s report, summarizing five years of high quality and generalizable trend data, sheds some much needed light on these complex questions and offers helpful information for administrators, policy-makers, clinicians, and researchers to consider at each of their unique institutions. This 2015 Annual Report summarizes data contributed to CCMH during the 2014-2015 academic year, closing on June 30, 2015. De-identified data were contributed by 139 college and university counseling centers, describing 100,736 unique college students seeking mental health treatment, 2,770 clinicians, and over 770,000 appointments. The following are critical to understand when reading this report: 1) This report describes college students receiving mental health services, NOT the general college student population. 2) This report is not a survey. The data summarized herein is gathered during routine clinical practice at participating counseling centers, is de-identified, and then contributed to CCMH. 3) The number of clients will vary by question because not all questions are asked at each center. 4) Counseling center members, that contributed data for this report, received IRB approval at their institution. Standardized Data Set (SDS) and the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS) The data within this report is made possible by standardized data embedded within electronic medical records (EMR). The SDS is a large collection of standardized questions, answers, and instruments that CCMH makes available to participating counseling centers through EMR vendors. The SDS has been collaboratively designed over time by hundreds of counseling centers and the CCMH Advisory Board, starting in 2006. Use of the SDS enables counseling centers to gather standardized data during routine clinical practice, which can then be contributed to CCMH for this annual report. The most up-to-date SDS definitions are available at https://ccmh.psu.edu. The CCAPS is a standardized multi-dimensional psychometric instrument designed by/for counseling centers that is used for initial assessment and outcome monitoring. The 2015 CCAPS was released in June 2015 with a new normative sample of more than 230,000 students in treatment, a graphical layout, average dose/ response curves, clinician alerts, and much more. The CCAPS is available to counseling centers via four electronic medical record (EMR) systems including Titanium Schedule, Medicat, Point and Click, and Pyramed. In addition, the 2015 CCAPS is now available via a dedicated web-interface for both counseling centers that do not use an EMR and those that utilize an unsupported EMR. Please email ccmh@psu.edu for more information about the CCAPS, the CCAPS User Manual, or online training webinars. Accessing CCMH Data – The New CCMH Data Navigator For many years, a key goal of CCMH has been to give data back, in an actionable form, to counseling center members, higher education, and the general public. After many years of exploring different strategies that did not work, this goal was finally realized in the fall of 2015 with the brand new CCMH Data Navigator. (We are thankful to the Healthy Minds Study at the University of Michigan for their help and support in this project!) This year’s data, along with prior years, are now available to members and the general public online via the CCMH Data Navigator. Participating centers will be able to track their data over time and benchmark with other schools. In addition, CCMH is now making aggregate data available to the general public for the purpose of informing the 1 national discussion on college student mental health with high-quality generalizable data about students seeking mental health services. The CCMH Data Navigator allows the user to examine specific data points over time and to examine any given data point via a wide range of demographic variables. The CCMH Data Navigator can be found online here: http://ccmh.psu.edu/data/ 2015 Report Highlights The 2015 Annual Report represents a decade of work for CCMH and the hundreds of participating counseling centers. In addition to describing more than 100,000 college students seeking mental health services in 20142015, this year’s report also summarizes mental health trends across five full academic years (2010-2011 through 2014-2015). The following list highlights a number of the key findings in this year’s report. Please note that these findings refer to students seen in counseling centers, unless otherwise specified: 1. A supplemental survey of CCMH members in 2015 examined change in institutional enrollment and counseling center utilization over the last 6 years (2009-2010 through 2014-2015). Data from 93 institutions showed, on average, the growth in number of students seeking services at counseling centers (+29.6%) was more than 5x the rate of institutional enrollment (+5.6%). Further, the growth in counseling center appointments (+38.4) is more than 7x the rate of institutional enrollment. (see page 7) 2. The lifetime prevalence rates for prior mental health treatment have remained quite stable over the past five years including prior counseling (1 in 2), prior psychiatric medications (1 in 3), and prior psychiatric hospitalizations (1 in 10). Although these rates are high and should be of concern, the stability of these indices suggest that the rates of prior treatment are not changing and therefore unlikely to be the cause of the increased demand for services. (see page 5) 3. Some types of self-reported distress (measured by the CCAPS) and mental health history variables (measured by the SDS) have remained very stable or even decreased slightly over the last five years, including CCAPS Subscale Scores on Academic Distress, Eating Concerns, Hostility (i.e., frustration), Substance Abuse, Family Distress, as well as SDS variables of prior treatment for drugs and alcohol and lifetime prevalence rates of harassment/sexual assault. (see page 6 for CCAPS and page 5 for SDS) 2 4. Three types of self-reported distress have demonstrated slow but consistent growth over the past five years including: Depression, Anxiety, and Social Anxiety. In comparison to areas of distress that are flat or decreasing, this finding indicates that college students are reporting increasing levels of distress, and that these specific areas parallel the most common presenting concerns, Depression and Anxiety, as determined by clinicians. (see page 6) 5. The lifetime prevalence rate for non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has increased slowly but steadily over the last five years from 21.8% to 25.0% (see page 5). While NSSI does not always represent imminent threat to self, it is usually evidence of poor coping or difficulty with coping and can be disruptive to the campus community. 6. The lifetime prevalence rate for serious suicidal ideation (i.e., “I have seriously considered suicide”) has increased substantially over the last 5 years from 23.8% to more than 32.9% (see page 5). This is a considerable change, especially in the context of other indices that are decreasing, flat, or increasing only slightly. 7. Among those who endorsed a history of serious suicidal ideation, the frequency of serious suicidal ideation occurrence within the last month also increased annually over the last three years from 7.2%in 2013 to 8.3% (this item was new in 2012). (see page 5) 8. The lifetime prevalence rate for “attempted suicide” has remained relatively flat for the last five years. (see page 5) 9. The lifetime prevalence rates for (a) thoughts of harming others and (b) causing serious harm to others have remained low and stable over 5 years. (see page 5) 10. Students who endorse mental health histories involving “threat to self ” thoughts and behaviors (NSSI, serious suicidal ideation, or suicide attempts) use an average of 27% more appointments than students who do not. (see page 9) 11. 20% of students seen in counseling centers utilize more than 50% of all appointments. (see page 9) Discussion of 2015 Highlights Hundreds of university and college counseling centers have collaborated with CCMH over the last decade to build a practice-research-network (PRN) focused on the goal of accurately describing trends in college student mental health using high quality and representative data. The 2015 Annual Report realizes this ambitious goal with fiveyear trend data representing hundreds of institutions. The goal of this section is to explore and interpret the complex data resulting from these efforts. First, the highlighted findings make it clear that many aspects of college student mental health have actually been stable over the past five years. For example, rates of prior mental health treatment, some types of mental health distress reported by students, and the frequency with which students report thoughts of hurting others (or having hurt another) have all remained essentially flat. These same students have expressed slightly increasing levels of depression and anxiety (see CCAPS Trends), but the increases are small. The relative stability of these variables does not decrease their significance (e.g., 10% of students in counseling centers report a prior psychiatric hospitalization), but it does help to clarify that some aspects of college student mental health are not “getting worse.” In contrast, a sub-group of mental health variables have demonstrated worrisome increases over the last five years, making it clear that some specific aspects of college student’s mental health are changing and in need of focused consideration. For example, the average demand for counseling center services grew at least 5x faster than average institutional enrollment. In addition, the last five years of data suggest that students seeking services are more likely to endorse “threat to self ” indicators such as serious suicidal thoughts and self-injurious behaviors, both of which increase the urgency for everyone involved. Finally, this year’s report finds that the growing percentage of students with “threat to self ” indicators are provided with nearly 30% more services. Collectively, these three trends represent a perfect storm for college counseling centers. Thus many will now ask, “Why is this happening?” Theories have abounded in recent years to explain the growth of mental health concerns in college ranging from parenting styles to lack of resilience or coping skills. While all of these theories may have value, it is important to test theories with data. An additional theory, which can be examined with our data, is that a myriad of large-scale intervention efforts and institutional changes have had a cumulative and measurable impact in higher education over the last ten years. Indeed, this theory would contend that some of the five-year trends observed in this year’s report are intended outcomes. While there is no clear starting point, the Garrett Lee Smith Memorial Act (GLSMA) was signed into law in 2004 by the US Congress to reduce the incidence of suicide among college students. Subsequent to this event, tens of millions of dollars were invested in higher education by a wide variety of funders with goals including: suicide prevention, educating campus communities about mental health, reducing stigma, increasing help seeking, and improving the ability of community members (faculty, staff, and students) to identify students-at-risk and refer them for treatment. During this same period, annual surveys of college student’s mental health have become commonplace, potentially impacting student’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. Finally, institutionally coordinated behavioralthreat and care-teams have become the accepted gold standard of practice in higher education. The common goal of these efforts is to improve our collective ability to identify students-at-risk in order to refer them to treatment. If these collective efforts have been cumulatively successful, they should hypothetically produce a measurable increase in both the overall demand for mental health services and the percentage of students in treatment who represent risk. While there are many findings in the 2015 report, and many potential interpretations, the 3 data support this hypothesis rather well. For example, the frequency that students in treatment report having “seriously considered suicide” has increased by 38% in the last five years (relative increase). This change stands out in a field of trends that are generally flat or changing only slightly. It also seems more plausible that this trend resulted from a decade of interventions focused on this very outcome rather than a sudden national decline in student’s resilience. Given the apparent alignment between theory, intervention, and data, it seems reasonable to pause and review our interpretation of, and response to, mental health concerns in higher education. The findings in this year’s report strongly suggest that a decade of efforts, aimed at building communities that are responsive to the mental health concerns of at-risk students, have been successful and that counseling centers are now bearing a heavy burden from this success. Consequently, it is now imperative that institutions of higher education take action to accommodate the increase in demand for mental health services that we have all worked so hard to create. 2014-2015 Publications and Presentations Since our founding in 2004, CCMH has operated as a practice-research network (PRN) conducting practiceoriented research (POR) by actively integrating the interests of practitioners, researchers, and administrators to achieve a wide variety of goals that are beneficial to the field. Over the past year, CCMH has been specifically addressing the scientist-practitioner gap through client-focused research, which is one approach within POR. Clientfocused research promotes the careful assessment and tracking of client’s progress in treatment, and also provides empirically validated feedback to therapists to augment their clinical practice. The 2015 CCAPS profile report exemplifies this type of practice oriented research. CCMH also continues to conduct research that is empirically rigorous and clinically valid. For example, Xiao et al. (2015) recently examined therapist differences in attendance and drop out rates. Janis et al. (2015) explored different methods for calculating the average change curve and feedback provision that were included in the 2015 CCAPS profile report. Youn et al. (2015) sought to understand therapist differences in clients’ outcome across the different CCAPS subscales. CCMH is excited to share the following POR publications and presentations from the past academic year: • Castonguay, L. G., & Muran, J. C. (2015). Fostering collaboration between researchers and clinicians through building practice-oriented research: An introduction. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 1-5. 4 • Castonguay, L. G., Youn, S., Xiao, H., Muran, J. C., & Barber, J. P. (2015). Building clinicians-researchers partnerships: Lessons from diverse natural settings and practice-oriented initiatives. Psychotherapy Research, 25(1), 166-184. • Hayes, J. A., McAleavey, A. A., Castonguay, L. G., & Locke, B. D. (in press). Psychotherapist effects with White and racial/ethnic minority clients: First, the good news. Journal of Counseling Psychology. • Janis, R., Youn, S., Xiao, H., Castonguay, L. G., Hayes, J. A., & Locke, B. D. (2015, June). Comparison of expected treatment response and nearest neighbor methods for generating expected recovery curves. Paper presented as part of a panel at the 2015 Society for Psychotherapy Research (SPR), 46th International meeting, Philadelphia, PA. • McAleavey, A. A., Lockard, A. J., Castonguay, L. G., Hayes, J. A., & Locke, B. D. (2015). Building a practice-research network: Obstacles faced and lessons learned at the Center for Collegiate Mental Health. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 134-151. • Nordberg, S. S., Castonguay, L. G., McAleavey, A. A., Locke, B. D., & Hayes, J. A. (Accepted for publication). Enhancing feedback for clinical use: Creating and evaluating profiles of clients seeking counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology • Ratanasiripong, P., Wang, C. D. C., Ratanasiripong, N., Hayes, J. A., Kaewboonchoo, O., & Kathalae, D. (2015). Development and cross-cultural validation of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms—Thai version. The Counseling Psychologist, 43, 248-271. • Xiao, H., Youn, S., Janis, R., Hayes, J. A., Castonguay, L. G., & Locke, B. D. (2015, June). The unpredictable client: Therapist differences in client early attendance and dropout. Paper presented as part of a panel at the 2015 Society for Psychotherapy Research (SPR), 46th International meeting, Philadelphia, PA. • Youn, S., Castonguay, L. G., Xiao, H., Janis, R., McAleavey, A. A., Lockard, A. J., Locke, B. D., & Hayes, J. A. (2015). The Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS): Merging clinical practice, training and research. Psychotherapy • Youn, S., Xiao, H., Janis, R., Castonguay, L. G., Hayes, J. A., & Locke, B. D. (2015, June). Therapist effects in naturalistic settings. Paper presented as part of a panel at the 2015 Society for Psychotherapy Research (SPR), 46th International meeting, Philadelphia, PA. Mental Health Trends To examine five-year mental health trends among college students in treatment, the following items were simplified to “Yes” or “No”, providing the life-time prevalence of each item. (NOTE: Some items have changed slightly over time. Items with an asterisk (*) had an answer format change between 2011-2012 and 2012-2013.) Data Sets Year # of Institutions # of Clients 2010-2011 97 82,611 2011-2012 120 97,012 Attended counseling for mental health concerns Taken a medication for mental health concerns Been hospitalized for mental health concerns* 50 35 12 40 45.2% 47.6% 48.7% 48.1% 48.8% 2014–2015 Made a suicide attempt* 10 32.9% 6 7.9% 8.0% 8.8% 8.9% 9.5% 6 2014–2015 2013–2014 2 2012–2013 4 2014–2014 0 7.8% 2013–2014 2 2012–2013 2014–2015 2013–2014 2012–2013 4 7.2% 8 8.3% 2011–2012 8 25.5% 2011–2012 5 23.8% 2010–2011 2014–2015 2013–2014 2012–2013 2011–2012 2010–2011 10 Seriously considered attempting suicide (Last time = within the last month or sooner): 2010–2011 30.3% 30.9% 25 15 0 10 30 2013–2014 35 7.8% 2012–2013 25 10 2 7.0% 2011–2012 Seriously considered attempting suicide* 20 4 0 Purposely injured yourself without suicidal intent (e.g., cutting, hitting, burning, hair pulling, etc.)* 15 5 10.3% 10.2% 10.2% 2010–2011 0 2014–2015 100,736 2013–2014 139 10 2012–2013 2014-2015 0 10 6 2011–2012 10 5 32.9% 32.6% 33.1% 8 2010–2011 20 101,027 2014–2015 95,109 140 2013–2014 132 2012–2013 15 2011–2012 20 2010–2011 30 2013-2014 25.0% 31.0% 31.8% 25 2012-2013 23.8% 22.5% 23.2% 20 21.8% 30 0 0 NOTE: New question in 2012. Considered seriously hurting another person* 12 11.2% 10.8% 10.8% 10 8 7.8% 7.9% 3.5 25 40 3.3% 3.3% 3.0 2.0 3.1% 35 20 21.0% 21.0% 33.3% 32.8% 33.3% 25 0 Experienced a traumatic event that caused you to feel intense fear, helplessness, or horror* Felt the need to reduce your alcohol or drug use* Others have expressed concern about your alcohol or drug use* Received treatment for alcohol or drug use* 40 30 20 5 17.7% 17.3% 17.5% 16.9% 16.7% 15 4 35 38.3% 36.9% 37.7% 38.0% 38.2% 25 30 20 25 4.2% 3.9% 2014–2015 2013–2014 2012–2013 1 2011–2012 2 2010–2011 2014–2015 2013–2014 2012–2013 0 2011–2012 5 2010–2011 2014–2015 2013–2014 2012–2013 0 2011–2012 5 4.4% 10 2010–2011 2014–2015 2013–2014 2012–2013 0 2011–2012 5 2010–2011 10 10 4.8% 4.6% 3 15 20 15 26.7% 25.9% 27.2% 26.7% 27.3% 2014–2015 2013–2014 5 0 2012–2013 10 2011–2012 15 2010–2011 2014–2015 2013–2014 2012–2013 5 2011–2012 0.0 0 10 2010–2011 2014–2015 2013–2014 0.5 36.7% 35.5% 30 20 2012–2013 1.0 19.1% 18.9% 20.0% 15 2.2% 2011–2012 1.5 2.4% 2010–2011 2014–2015 2013–2014 2012–2013 2011–2012 2010–2011 2 Had unwanted sexual contact(s) or experience(s)* 2.5 6 4 Intentionally caused serious injury to another person* Experienced harassing, controlling, and/or abusive behavior from another person (e.g., friend, family member, partner, authority figure, etc.)* 0 5 ty ty CCAPS Trends The Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS) is a multi-dimensional assessment and outcome monitoring instrument used by members of CCMH. The 2015 CCAPS was released in June of 2015 and includes two versions: the CCAPS-62 (62 items, 8 subscales) and the CCAPS-34 (34 items, 7 subscales). Both the CCAPS-62 and CCAPS-34 also include the Distress Index, an overall measure of a client’s general psychological distress using items from several CCAPS subscales. Students respond to the items on a 5-point likert scale from 0 (Not at all like me) to 4 (Extremely like me). To explore whether student self-reported distress is changing over time, we examined the average raw subscale scores over the last five years for both the CCAPS-62 and the CCAPS-34. The charts below indicate that the average raw scores have gradually increased for Depression, Generalized Anxiety, and Social Anxiety. On the other hand, flat or decreasing raw scores are noted for Academic Distress, Eating Concerns, Hostility (i.e., frustration), Substance/Alcohol Use, and Family Distress. These findings indicate that not all areas of student distress are worsening and some may even be decreasing. However, Depression, Generalized Anxiety, and Social Anxiety are showing slight but consistent increases. These increases are consistent with the most common presenting concerns in counseling centers. (see CLICC-Check All That Apply, page 11) CCAPS-62 Trends: Average Raw Subscale Scores (2010 to 2015) 2.0 2014-2015 1.5 2013-2014 2010-2011 2012-2013 2011-2012 1.0 2012-2013 2011-2012 2013-2014 2010-2011 2014-2015 0.5 0.0 Alcohol Use Distress Index Depression Generalized Anxiety Social Anxiety Academic Distress Eating Concerns Hostility Substance Use Family Distress CCAPS-34 Trends: Average Raw Subscale Score (2010 to 2015) 2.0 2010-2011 2011-2012 1.5 2010-2011 2012-2013 2011-2012 2012-2013 1.0 2013-2014 2013-2014 2014-2015 2014-2015 0.5 0.0 Alcohol Use Distress Index 6 Depression Generalized Anxiety Social Anxiety Academic Distress Eating Concerns Hostility Alcohol Use Distress Index Changes in Counseling Center Utilization from 2009-2010 to 2014-2015 It is widely believed that the demand for mental health services in college is growing at an unprecedented pace. This belief is based on widespread anecdotal reports from clinicians, student surveys, surveys of counseling center directors, and a handful of data-driven reports from individual counseling centers. To examine this question systematically from a national perspective, CCMH conducted a supplemental membership survey in November 2015 that asked counseling centers to provide the following specific data points over the last five academic years between 20092010 and 2014-2015: (1) total institutional enrollment during the Fall semester, (2) total number of students seeking services at the counseling center, and (3) the total number of attended appointments in the counseling center. Ninety-three CCMH members (out of a total of 120 responses) were able to provide complete data for both 2009-2010 and 20142015 academic years. These 93 cases were used for the following five-year trend analysis. The number of enrolled students, students seeking counseling services, and attended appointments were averaged across institutions, and the percentage of change was calculated for each data point. Results indicated that, on average over the last 5 years, institutional enrollment grew by 5.6%, the number of students seeking services increased by 29.6%, and the number of attended appointments increased by 38.4%. In other words, the number of students treated by counseling centers grew at more than 5x the rate of institutional enrollment and the number of attended appointments grew at more than 7x the pace of institutional enrollment. To check for the influence of outliers (schools with dramatic and unusual growth or loss), the three top/bottom schools with greatest growth/ greatest loss were removed and analyses were re-run. Results shifted only slightly, indicating that the results were not dramatically skewed by individual schools with dramatic and unusual change. Descriptive statistics (pg. 8) indicate a wide range of sizes, utilization rates, and change rates. 40 Change Rates between 2009-2010 and 2014-2015 for Counseling Centers and Institutions (N=93) 30 35 38.4% 5.6% 0 5 10 15 20 25 29.6% Institutional Enrollment Students Served Appointments Attended 7 Descriptive Statistics Table (N=93) Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Institutional Enrollment 946 6,0821 19,506.4 13,384.1 Students Served 222 4,525 1,529.9 1,099.3 Appointments Attended 411 30,656 7,716.5 6,053.6 1.3% 26.3% 9.5% 4.9% Change in Institutional Enrollment -22.2% 37.1% 5.9% 10.4% Change in Students Served -15.9% 210.1% 31.8% 31.4% Change in Appointments Attended -30.9% 363.5% 44.3% 46.3% Change in Utilization -20.4% 212.2% 24.9% 29.3% 2014 Utilization (% of student body served in the counseling center) These results indicate that the demand for counseling center services is dramatically outpacing the growth of institutional enrollment. While this survey did not examine staffing level changes over time, we know that it is rare for counseling centers to experience a 30% increase in staffing in just five years, and that most counseling centers did not meet the IACS-recommended paid staff-to-student ratios in 2009 (see the 2010 AUCCCD Survey). A number of conclusions can be drawn from these survey results: 1) A hypothetical average counseling center that met IACS recommended staff-to-student ratios in 2009, and also received consistent annual funding increases tied to enrollment growth based on a known historical utilization rate, would be substantially understaffed five years later in 2014. 2) The average increase in demand for services, without commensurate increases in resources, will make it difficult to provide responsive mental health services. Counseling centers that have not been equipped to respond to this trend may have to reduce other critical services such as education and training of campus stakeholders, consultation services for faculty and staff, participation in research, treating students with less severe concerns, and the training of future mental health providers. 3) These results suggest that institutions should evaluate funding decisions based on observed clinical demand (the number/rate of students seeking services) rather than historical patterns of utilization that may no longer be reliable. 4) Counseling center utilization is likely to increase even when institutional enrollment decreases. 5) The average relationship, across 93 institutions, between student change in enrollment and change in students served in the counseling center was 1-to-5. In other words, between 2009-2010 and 2014-2015, a 1% increase in institutional enrollment was associated with a 5% increase in the number of students served in the counseling center. 8 Counseling Center Resource Utilization by Students One way to inform allocation of resources within centers is to examine how counseling center services are being used. With this in mind, 2014-2015 data was examined to determine how resources are distributed among students seeking services. The following points describe how various types of counseling center appointments are utilized by students across participating centers in 2014-2015: • One (1) is the most common number of appointments per client/per year. • Clients averaged 5.86 appointments with a range of 1-117 appointments. • 20% of clients accounted for over 50% of all appointments. • 10% of clients accounted for 36% of all appointments, averaging 20.96 appointments. • 5% of clients accounted for 23% of all appointments, averaging 26.14 appointments. • 1% of clients accounted for 6.5% of all appointments, averaging 38.13 appointments. • 10 clients utilized a total of 878 appointments. Average Number of Attended Individual Sessions A common question among counseling centers is, “What is the average number of counseling sessions attended by clients?” To examine this question we reviewed the 20142015 appointment data for initial clinical evaluations and any individual counseling session: A. Total number of attended appointments (initial and individual counseling): 373,495 B. Total number of clients who attended appointments in A: 79,331 C. Average number of attended counseling sessions per client (A divided by B): 4.71 This preliminary analysis, of actual appointment attendance data across 139 institutions and approximately 370,000 appointments, indicates that clients attend slightly less than 5 sessions of individual counseling on average (including an intake, but excluding other types of appointments). Impact of “Threat to Self” History on Appointment Usage To explore whether the growing levels of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and serious suicidal ideation (see MH Trends) are having a clinical impact on counseling centers, we compared the total number of appointments (of any attendance value) for clients who endorsed these indicators and those who did not using five years of combined appointment data from 2010 through 2015. Average number of appointments for clients with and without a history of “threat to self” thoughts and behaviors. 12 Yes 10 No 8 6 4 2 0 No Yes Self-Harm No Yes Seriously Considered Suicide No Yes No Yes Self-Harm & Suicide Attempt Seriously Considered Suicide This graph illustrates that students with a history of “threat to self ” thoughts or behaviors use an average of 27% more services than students who do not. 9 Standardized Data Set (SDS) The Standardized Data Set (SDS) is a set of standardized materials used by counseling centers during routine clinical practice. The SDS contains 8 major sections, which include demographic questions, background information, and instruments that collect information related to the treatment provided to students receiving services. These sections include: Demographics: Instruments: Client Information Clinician Index of Client Concerns Provider Data Critical Incident Form Center Information Termination Form Participating Institutions CCMH Appointment Categories The following sections of this report summarize the SDS data collected in 2014-2015. Please note that five of the SDS sections are included within the 2014-2015 data set. The Termination Form was implemented July 2015 and will be included in next year’s report. Clinician Index of Client Concerns (CLICC) The CLICC was designed by CCMH to capture and facilitate reporting on the most common presenting concerns of counseling center clients, as assessed by the clinician, at the point of “intake”, or equivalent appointment. The resulting data enable individual centers, and CCMH, to quickly and easily report on the most common client concerns in addition to supporting a wide variety of research. The CLICC includes 44 concerns and asks the clinician to (a) check all that apply and (b) to identify the ‘top concern’ of those selected. This dual approach captures the complexity of each client while also highlighting the ‘primary’ concern of each individual client. 10 CLICC – “Check all that apply” First, clinicians are asked to “check all that apply” for each client, such that one client can have many concurrent concerns. As a result, this chart illustrates how often each concern occurs across all clients, regardless of how many concerns a student had or what their top concern was (N=37,856). Concern Anxiety Stress Depression Family Relationship problem (specific) Academic performance Interpersonal functioning Self-esteem/confidence Sleep Adjustment to new environment Social isolation Eating/body image Mood instability Grief/loss Trauma Alcohol Career Identity development Suicidality Attention difficulties Perfectionism Anger management Sexual abuse/assault (victim) Health/medical Drugs Self-injurious thoughts or behaviors Financial Harassment/emotional abuse (victim) Obsessions or compulsions Other Physical abuse/assault (victim) Legal/judicial/conduct Racial, ethnic, or cultural concerns Sexual orientation Sexual concern Violent thoughts or behaviors towards others Religion/spirituality Gender identity Discrimination Addiction (not drugs or alcohol) Psychotic thoughts or behaviors Pregnancy related None Stalking (victim) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Percent 11 CLICC – “Top-most concern” For this question, clinicians are asked to choose one primary concern (i.e., the top-most concern) per client. As a result, clinicians are asked to choose one primary concern (i.e., the top concern) per client. As a result, this graph illustrates the frequency of each concern as the primary concern for clients (N=37,856). Concern Anxiety Depression Relationship problem (specific) Stress Family Academic performance Interpersonal functioning Grief/loss Mood instability Adjustment to new environment Self-esteem/confidence Eating/body image Alcohol Other Trauma Suicidality Sexual abuse/assault (victim) Identity development Attention difficulties Career Anger management Legal/judicial/conduct Drugs Health/medical Obsessions or compulsions Social isolation Self-injurious thoughts or behaviors Perfectionism Harassment/emotional abuse (victim) Sleep Sexual orientation Physical abuse/assault (victim) None Sexual concern Gender identity Financial Psychotic thoughts or behaviors Addiction (not drugs or alcohol) Pregnancy related Violent thoughts or behaviors towards others Racial, ethnic, or cultural concerns Religion/spirituality Stalking (victim) Discrimination 0 5 10 Percent 12 15 20 Client Demographic Information The SDS contains a number of “core” or required items and a larger number of optional items that are typically asked of students seeking services. Because centers can ask different questions, the total number of responses vary by question. What is your gender identity?* n Percentage Woman 53,028 62.6 Man 30,676 36.2 Transgender 292 0.3 Self-Identify 699 0.8 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #88 What was your sex at birth? Overall (%) n=8,912 Male (%) n=2,939 Female (%) n=5,845 Transgender (%) n=34 Self-Identify (%) n=94 Female 66.4 0.2 99.7 61.8 66.0 Male 33.6 99.8 0.3 38.2 34.0 Intersex 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #90 Do you consider yourself to be: Overall (%) n=78,935 Male (%) n=28,505 Female (%) n=49,465 Transgender (%) n=283 Self-Identify (%) n=682 7.0 Heterosexual 84.7 86.3 85.2 16.6 Lesbian 1.6 0.0 2.4 8.1 7.5 Gay 2.8 7.3 0.1 6.0 5.9 Bisexual 5.7 3.2 6.9 19.4 17.3 Questioning 2.3 1.7 2.5 8.8 9.1 Self-Identify 3.0 1.5 2.9 41.0 53.2 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #91 Since puberty, with whom have you had sexual experience(s)? Overall (%) n=7,711 Male (%) n=2,377 Female (%) n=5,237 Transgender (%) n=32 Self-Identify (%) n=65 Only with men 49.3 5.7 69.9 6.3 9.2 Mostly with men 10.6 3.7 13.4 9.4 30.8 About the same number of men and women 2.2 1.5 2.2 21.9 10.8 Mostly with women 2.8 5.3 1.3 25.0 16.9 Only with women 22.8 70.8 1.2 21.9 10.8 I have not had sexual experiences 12.3 13.0 11.8 15.6 21.5 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #93 13 People are different in their sexual attraction to other people. Which best describes your current feelings? Are you: Overall (%) n=8,778 Male (%) n=2,843 Female (%) n=5,832 Transgender (%) n=33 Self-Identify (%) n=70 Only attracted to women 26.8 78.7 1.9 12.1 4.3 Mostly attracted to women 4.9 8.7 2.5 45.5 25.7 Equally attracted to women and men 4.4 1.7 5.1 27.3 40.0 Mostly attracted to men 13.9 3.6 18.9 3.0 17.1 Only attracted to men 48.2 6.0 69.6 9.1 4.3 1.8 1.2 2.0 3.0 8.6 Not sure This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #94 What is your race/ethnicity? Overall (%) n=80,039 Male (%) n=29,072 Female (%) n=50,016 Transgender (%) n=278 Self-Identify (%) n=673 African-American/ Black 9.2 7.5 10.3 6.5 4.0 American Indian or Alaskan Native 0.4 .4 0.3 1.1 .4 Asian American/Asian 6.9 7.2 6.8 2.2 3.7 Hispanic/Latino/a 7.6 7.1 8.0 6.5 5.8 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 Multiracial 4.5 4.0 4.7 8.6 7.9 White 69.5 71.5 68.3 72.3 71.3 1.7 2.1 1.3 2.5 6.8 Self-Identify This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #95 14 What is your country of origin? Country n Country Afghanistan 87 11 Aland Islands 12 Czech Republic n Country n Country n Country n Italy 83 Oman 13 22 Jamaica 107 Pakistan 139 Syrian Arab Republic Albania 32 Denmark 12 Japan 117 Taiwan 99 93 Jordan 23 Palestinian Territory, Occupied 17 10 Ecuador 83 Kenya 39 Panama 35 Tanzania United Republic of Argentina 48 Armenia 12 Australia 51 Egypt 55 Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Paraguay 18 Thailand 37 32 Peru 124 Trinidad and Tobago 25 110 Dominican Republic Austria 13 El Salvador 45 Bahamas 25 Ethiopia 47 160 99 Turkey Finland 10 416 Poland 61 Belgium 10 Korea, Republic of Philippines Bangladesh Uganda 12 France 67 244 10 30 Puerto Rico Belize Kuwait Ukraine 43 Germany 169 34 39 33 Lebanon Romania Bolivia Ghana 63 Bosnia and Herzegovina 18 116 United Arab Emirates 18 Liberia 31 Greece 34 Lithuania 10 Russian Federation 41 45 12 United Kingdom Malaysia Rwanda 193 Guatemala Guinea 13 163 69,443 402 Saudi Arabia United States Mexico Guyana 14 Serbia 18 Haiti 100 Moldova Republic of 11 Sierra Leone 10 195 Honduras 42 Morocco 15 Singapore 24 United States Minor Outlying Islands Hong Kong 39 Myanmar 11 Somalia 17 India 821 Nepal 53 South Africa 37 Indonesia 50 Netherlands 34 Iran, Islamic Republic of 173 New Zealand 17 Nicaragua 24 Iraq 36 Ireland 29 Israel 36 Brazil 325 Bulgaria 26 Cameroon 23 Canada 303 Chile 52 China 1,086 Colombia Congo, The Democratic Republic of the 248 10 Costa Rica 23 Cuba 101 Nigeria 132 Norway 24 Spain Uruguay 49 Sri Lanka 31 Sudan 21 Sweden 29 Switzerland 11 11 Venezuela 150 Vietnam 138 Virgin Islands, U.S. 26 Yemen 10 Zimbabwe 14 Countries with less than 10 individuals: Algeria Croatia Latvia Qatar American Samoa Cyprus Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Saint Helena Angola Djbouti Luxembourg Saint Kitts and Nevis Antigua and Barbuda Dominica Macao Saint Lucia Aruba Eritrea Azerbaijan Bahrain Estonia Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Barbados Fiji Madagascar Senegal Belarus French Guiana Malawi Slovakia Benin Gabon Mali Slovenia Bermuda Gambia Malta Suriname Bhutan Georgia Marshall Islands Swaziland Botswana Grenada Martinique Tajikistan Burkina Faso Guam Mayotte Togo Burundi Guinea-Bissau Micronesia, Federated States of Tunisia Cambodia Hungary Mongolia Montenegro Turkmenistan Cape Verde Iceland Namibia Turks and Caicos Islands Cayman Islands Jersey Netherlands Antilles Uzbekistan Central African Republic Kazakhstan Niger Virgin Islands, British Chad Kyrgyzstan Northern Mariana Islands Western Sahara Congo Lao People’s Democratic Republic Papua New Guinea Zambia Portugal Cote d’Ivoire This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #31 15 Are you an international student? Overall (%) n=80,638 Male (%) n=29,039 Female (%) n=50,654 Transgender (%) n=282 Self-Identify (%) n=663 Yes 5.2 6.4 4.6 1.1 2.9 No 94.8 93.6 95.4 98.9 97.1 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #32 Are you the first generation in your family to attend college? Overall (%) n=72,019 Male (%) n=25,833 Female (%) n=45,311 Transgender (%) n=261 Self-Identify (%) n=614 Yes 22.5 20.8 23.4 24.9 20.0 No 77.5 79.2 76.6 75.1 80.0 Male (%) n=30,099 Female (%) n=52,055 Transgender (%) n=283 Self-Identify (%) n=676 19.7 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #56 Current academic status Overall (%) n=83,113 Freshmen/first-year 20.1 19.9 20.2 24.4 Sophomore 20.4 20.0 20.6 19.8 21.2 Junior 22.4 22.4 22.5 23.7 22.8 Senior 21.4 22.2 20.9 18.0 22.2 Graduate/professional degree student 14.1 13.7 14.3 12.0 11.5 Non-student 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.2 High school student taking college classes 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Non-degree student 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 Faculty or staff 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 Other 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.8 2.2 Female (%) n=14,665 Transgender (%) n=67 Self-Identify (%) n=169 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #37 Graduate or professional degree program Overall (%) n=23,350 Male (%) n=8,449 Post-Baccalaureate 11.0 11.4 10.9 7.5 4.7 Masters 14.5 12.2 15.8 14.9 12.4 Doctoral degree 8.0 8.9 7.5 3.0 10.1 Law 2.2 2.7 2.0 1.5 1.2 Medical 2.2 1.7 2.5 0.0 0.0 Pharmacy 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 1.2 Dental 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 Veterinary Medicine 0.6 0.2 0.8 1.5 0.0 Not Applicable 54.9 56.5 53.8 65.7 66.9 Other 6.1 5.9 6.2 6.0 3.6 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #39 16 What year are you in your graduate/professional program? Overall (%) n=11,684 Male (%) n=4,218 Female (%) n=7,370 Transgender (%) n=23 Self-Identify (%) n=73 1 35.4 32.7 36.8 34.8 50.7 2 24.8 23.6 25.5 26.1 16.4 3 15.0 15.1 14.9 26.1 11.0 4 17.4 19.3 16.4 8.7 11.0 5+ 7.4 9.2 6.3 4.3 11.0 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #41 Did you transfer from another campus/institution to this school? Overall (%) n=75,995 Male (%) n=27,480 Female (%) n=47,646 Transgender (%) n=250 Self-Identify (%) n=619 Yes 19.8 21.0 19.0 24.0 25.5 No 80.2 79.0 81.0 76.0 74.5 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #46 What kind of housing do you currently have? Overall (%) n=65,332 Male (%) n=23,417 Female (%) n=41,138 Transgender (%) n=220 Self-Identify (%) n=557 On-campus residence hall/apartment 38.4 36.6 39.3 41.8 40.4 On/off campus fraternity/sorority house 2.0 2.4 1.7 0.9 1.1 On/off campus co-operative housing 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.4 1.1 Off-campus apartment/house 57.3 58.6 56.9 53.6 55.8 Other 1.3 1.4 1.2 2.3 1.6 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #42 With whom do you live? (check all that apply) Overall (%) Male (%) Female (%) Transgender (%) Self-Identify (%) Alone 9.8 (n=8,298) 10.4 (n=3,176) 9.4 (n=4,983) 15.4 (n=45) 13.4 (n=94) Spouse, partner, or significant other 7.5 (n=6,372) 6.7 (n=2,053) 8.0 (n=4,227) 11.6 (n=34) 8.3 (n=58) Roommate(s) 49.3 (n=41,755) 48.0 (n=14,739) 50.1 (n=26,584) 41.1 (n=120) 44.6 (n=312) Children 2.1 (n=1,751) 1.6 (n=485) 2.4 (n=1,249) 1.7 (n=5) 1.7 (n=12) Parent(s) or guardian(s) 7.0 (n=5,907) 6.8 (n=2,082) 7.0 (n=3,716) 11.6 (n=34) 10.7 (n=75) Family other 3.3 (n=2,829) 3.3 (n=1,017) 3.3 (n=1,771) 4.5 (n=13) 4.0 (n=28) 1.1 (n=910) 1.0 (n=311) 1.1 (n=576) 2.4 (n=7) 2.3 (n=16) Other This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #44 17 Relationship status Overall (%) n=80,677 Male (%) n=29,198 Female (%) n=50,526 Transgender (%) n=279 Self-Identify (%) n=674 Single 61.8 67.3 58.7 59.5 58.8 Serious dating or committed relationship 32.6 27.2 35.7 36.6 37.4 Civil union, domestic partnership, or equivalent 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.9 Married 4.1 4.2 4.1 2.9 1.9 Divorced 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.0 0.6 Separated 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 Widowed 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 Female (%) n=47,793 Transgender (%) n=273 Self-Identify (%) n=637 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #33 Mental Health History Items Attended counseling for mental health concerns Overall (%) n=76,060 Male (%) n=27,357 Never 51.3 56.4 48.9 24.5 24.0 Prior to college 19.4 17.0 20.6 25.6 25.7 After starting college 16.4 16.1 16.5 19.8 21.8 Both 13.0 10.5 14.0 30.0 28.4 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #1 Taken a prescribed medication for mental health concerns Overall (%) n=78,871 Male (%) n=26,876 Female (%) n=47,098 Transgender (%) n=266 Self-Identify (%) n=631 Never 66.9 69.0 66.1 48.5 46.0 Prior to college 8.8 8.7 8.7 11.3 14.4 After starting college 13.1 12.4 13.3 16.5 19.3 Both 11.3 9.8 11.9 23.7 20.3 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #2 NOTE: The following paired questions ask the student to identify “How many times” and “The last time” for each experience/event. Frequencies for “The last time” questions are based on students who reported having the experience one time or more. Been hospitalized for mental health concerns (how many times) Overall (%) n=80,503 Male (%) n=28,960 Female (%) n=50,578 Transgender (%) n=285 Never 89.8 89.6 90.0 82.1 81.5 1 time 6.6 6.6 6.6 11.9 12.1 2-3 times 2.8 2.9 2.6 3.9 4.7 4-5 times 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.7 More than 5 times 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.4 1.0 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #64 18 Self-Identify (%) n=680 Been hospitalized for mental health concerns (the last time) Overall (%) n=7,865 Male (%) n=2,872 Female (%) n=4,818 Transgender (%) n=50 Self-Identify (%) n=125 Never 1.2 1.6 0.9 0.0 0.0 Within the last two weeks 8.8 9.3 8.7 2.0 4.8 Within the last month 4.9 5.4 4.7 6.0 4.0 Within the last year 20.9 20.3 21.2 18.0 24.0 Within the last 1-5 years 40.5 38.9 41.4 52.0 40.0 More than 5 years ago 23.7 24.5 23.1 22.0 27.2 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #65 Purposely injured yourself without suicidal intent (e.g., cutting, hitting, burning, etc.) (how many times) Overall (%) n=80,321 Male (%) n=28,874 Female (%) n=50,489 Transgender (%) n=281 Self-Identify (%) n=677 Never 75.0 83.3 70.9 41.6 38.8 1 time 5.4 4.7 5.8 6.8 8.0 2-3 times 6.8 5.2 7.6 10.7 11.8 4-5 times 2.5 1.5 3.0 5.3 6.1 More than 5 times 10.3 5.3 12.6 35.6 35.3 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #72 Purposely injured yourself without suicidal intent (e.g., cutting, hitting, burning, etc.) (the last time) Overall (%) n=16,927 Male (%) n=4,045 Female (%) n=12,367 Transgender (%) n=148 Self-Identify (%) n=367 Never 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.3 Within the last two weeks 14.0 14.8 13.6 14.9 16.1 Within the last month 8.4 8.4 8.3 6.8 12.5 Within the last year 21.1 20.9 21.1 25.0 22.3 Within the last 1-5 years 33.0 32.7 33.1 40.5 32.4 More than 5 years ago 22.7 22.2 23.2 12.8 16.3 Self-Identify (%) n=681 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #73 Seriously considered attempting suicide (how many times) Overall (%) n=80,333 Male (%) n=28,895 Female (%) n=50,476 Transgender (%) n=281 Never 67.1 69.2 66.5 34.9 31.6 1 time 11.9 11.2 12.3 11.4 13.5 2-3 times 11.7 10.6 12.0 20.6 25.6 4-5 times 2.5 2.2 2.5 6.8 7.0 More than 5 times 6.9 6.9 6.6 26.3 22.3 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #74 19 Seriously considered attempting suicide (the last time) Overall (%) n=21,413 Male (%) n=7,146 Female (%) n=13,688 Transgender (%) n=167 Self-Identify (%) n=412 Never 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.0 1.2 Within the last two weeks 16.0 18.8 14.5 15.6 19.2 Within the last month 10.3 11.1 9.9 7.2 11.2 Within the last year 21.1 21.2 20.9 22.8 22.1 Within the last 1-5 years 34.5 31.8 35.9 40.1 32.8 More than 5 years ago 17.3 16.4 17.9 14.4 13.6 Self-Identify (%) n=678 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #75 Made a suicide attempt (how many times) Overall (%) n=80,247 Male (%) n=28,847 Female (%) n=50,439 Transgender (%) n=283 Never 90.5 92.1 89.9 69.3 76.0 1 time 6.3 5.3 6.7 16.6 13.6 2-3 times 2.5 2.1 2.6 10.6 8.1 4-5 times 0.3 0.3 0.4 1.1 0.7 More than 5 times 0.4 0.3 0.4 2.5 1.6 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #76 Made a suicide attempt (the last time) Overall (%) n=6,579 Male (%) n=1,955 Female (%) n=4,390 Transgender (%) n=82 Self-Identify (%) n=152 Never 0.8 1.1 0.7 0.0 1.3 Within the last two weeks 5.5 6.8 5.1 3.7 2.6 Within the last month 3.3 3.9 3.1 1.2 2.6 Within the last year 15.9 15.4 16.0 12.2 17.8 Within the last 1-5 years 43.1 41.9 43.2 56.1 46.7 More than 5 years ago 31.4 30.7 31.9 26.8 28.9 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #77 Considered causing serious physical injury to another (how many times) Overall (%) n=80,218 Male (%) n=28,841 Female (%) n=50,418 Transgender (%) n=283 Self-Identify (%) n=676 Never 89.2 86.2 91.0 82.0 79.4 1 time 3.4 4.1 3.0 4.2 5.8 2-3 times 3.8 5.0 3.1 5.7 6.1 4-5 times 0.8 0.9 0.7 2.1 1.2 More than 5 times 2.8 3.7 2.2 6.0 7.5 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #78 20 Considered causing serious physical injury to another (the last time) Overall (%) n=6,629 Male (%) n=3,062 Female (%) n=3,5405 Transgender (%) n=46 Self-Identify (%) n=116 Never 2.2 2.4 2.2 0.0 0.9 Within the last two weeks 19.2 18.9 19.8 13.0 16.4 Within the last month 11.4 10.8 12.0 6.5 12.1 Within the last year 23.8 24.8 23.0 23.9 21.6 Within the last 1-5 years 29.2 29.1 29.0 39.1 31.9 More than 5 years ago 14.1 14.1 14.0 17.4 17.2 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #79 Intentionally caused serious physical injury to another (how many times) Overall (%) n=79,830 Male (%) n=28,737 Female (%) n=50,136 Transgender (%) n=284 Self-Identify (%) n=673 Never 96.9 95.6 97.7 95.1 95.2 1 time 1.6 2.1 1.3 2.5 2.2 2-3 times 1.0 1.4 0.7 2.1 1.5 4-5 times 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.6 More than 5 times 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.4 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #80 Intentionally caused serious physical injury to another (the last time) Overall (%) n=1,797 Male (%) n=927 Female (%) n=831 Transgender (%) n=12 Self-Identify (%) n=27 Never 2.8 2.9 2.9 0.0 0.0 Within the last two weeks 6.5 4.5 9.0 0.0 0.0 Within the last month 5.0 4.4 5.8 0.0 0.0 Within the last year 15.5 14.7 16.6 0.0 14.8 Within the last 1-5 years 34.3 35.4 33.1 50.0 25.9 More than 5 years ago 35.9 38.1 32.6 50.0 59.3 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #81 Someone had sexual contact with you without your consent (e.g., you were afraid to stop what was happening, passed out, drugged, drunk, incapacitated, asleep, threatened or physically forced) (how many times) Overall (%) n=79,286 Male (%) n=28,546 Female (%) n=49,790 Transgender (%) n=282 Self-Identify (%) n=668 Never 80.0 93.2 72.8 69.5 57.5 1 time 11.3 4.4 15.1 13.1 17.5 2-3 times 5.5 1.5 7.7 7.4 15.3 4-5 times 0.9 0.3 1.2 2.1 2.2 More than 5 times 2.3 0.7 3.2 7.8 7.5 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #82 21 Someone had sexual contact with you without your consent (e.g., you were afraid to stop what was happening, passed out, drugged, drunk, incapacitated, asleep, threatened or physically forced) (the last time) Overall (%) n=12,767 Male (%) n=1,570 Female (%) n=10,863 Transgender (%) n=81 Self-Identify (%) n=253 Never 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Within the last two weeks 3.7 2.5 3.9 2.5 2.4 Within the last month 3.7 2.5 4.0 1.2 2.0 Within the last year 19.9 16.1 20.5 19.8 18.2 Within the last 1-5 years 38.7 30.4 39.8 38.3 45.8 More than 5 years ago 33.5 47.6 31.4 38.3 31.6 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #83 Experienced harassing, controlling, and/or abusive behavior from another person (e.g., friend, family member, partner, or authority figure) (how many times) Overall (%) n=80,000 Male (%) n=28,781 Female (%) n=50,263 Transgender (%) n=278 Self-Identify (%) n=678 Never 66.7 75.7 62.1 42.8 33.9 1 time 6.9 4.6 8.2 6.8 8.3 2-3 times 7.3 5.3 8.4 9.7 12.1 4-5 times 2.0 1.4 2.4 4.7 2.2 More than 5 times 17.0 13.0 18.9 36.0 43.5 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #84 Experienced harassing, controlling, and/or abusive behavior from another person (e.g., friend, family member, partner, or authority figure) (the last time) Overall (%) n=20,762 Male (%) n=5,389 Female (%) n=14,837 Transgender (%) n=144 Self-Identify (%) n=392 Never 0.9 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.0 Within the last two weeks 10.3 10.5 10.3 9.0 7.9 7.9 7.7 7.8 13.9 11.2 Within the last month Within the last year 20.7 18.7 21.2 25.0 24.5 Within the last 1-5 years 37.0 30.5 39.4 32.6 36.7 More than 5 years ago 23.3 31.3 20.5 18.8 19.6 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #85 Experienced a traumatic event that caused you to feel intense fear, helplessness, or horror (how many times) Overall (%) n=77,990 Male (%) n=28,153 Female (%) n=48,906 Transgender (%) n=273 Self-Identify (%) n=658 Never 61.9 67.7 58.8 51.3 47.6 1 time 16.8 14.1 18.4 13.9 15.8 2-3 times 12.5 10.7 13.5 15.4 16.9 4-5 times 2.2 1.9 2.4 2.9 5.3 More than 5 times 6.5 5.6 6.8 16.5 14.4 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #86 22 Experienced a traumatic event that caused you to feel intense fear, helplessness, or horror (the last time) Overall (%) n=22,591 Male (%) n=6,849 Female (%) n=15,328 Transgender (%) n=116 Self-Identify (%) n=298 Never 0.9 1.1 0.8 0.0 0.3 Within the last two weeks 11.3 13.1 10.5 6.9 10.1 Within the last month 7.3 7.4 7.3 4.3 6.0 Within the last year 22.6 22.0 22.8 25.0 21.5 Within the last 1-5 years 34.9 32.2 36.1 37.9 33.9 More than 5 years ago 23.1 24.1 22.5 25.9 28.2 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #87 Please select the traumatic event(s) you have experienced: Overall (%) n=16,013 Male (%) n=4,558 Female (%) n=11,170 Transgender (%) n=76 Self-Identify (%) n=209 Childhood physical abuse 18.8 (n=3,004) 20.6 (n=939) 17.8 (n=1,987) 19.7 (n=15) 30.1 (n=63) Childhood sexual abuse 16.1 (n=2,586) 9.9 (n=451) 18.6 (n=2,076) 17.1 (n=13) 22.0 (n=46) Childhood emotional abuse 44.3 (n=7,092) 42.6 (n=1,943) 44.6 (n=4,983) 56.6 (n=43) 58.9 (n=123) Physical attack (e.g., mugged, beaten up, shot, stabbed, threatened with a weapon) 15.2 (n=2,433) 23.3 (n=1,060) 11.8 (n=1,316) 21.1 (n=16) 19.6 (n=41) Sexual violence (rape or attempted rape, sexually assaulted, stalked, abused by intimate partner, etc.) 29.3 (n=4,686) 8.0 (n=364) 37.7 (n=4,207) 31.6 (n=24) 43.5 (n=91) Military combat or war zone experience 1.3 (n=213) 3.2 (n=48) 0.5 (n=60) 0.0 (n=0) 2.4 (n=5) Kidnapped or taken hostage 1.1 (n=176) 0.7 (n=33) 1.3 (n=142) 0.0 (n=0) 0.5 (n=1) 11.7 (n=1,875) 14.3 (n=651) 10.7 (n=1,191) 13.2 (n=10) 11.0 (n=23) Terrorist attack 0.9 (n=138) 1.5 (n=68) 0.6 (n=67) 1.3 (n=1) 1.0 (n=2) Near drowning 10.2 (n=1,630) 14.9 (n=677) 8.1 (n=910) 19.7 (n=15) 13.4 (n=28) Diagnosed with life threatening illness 4.2 (n=676) 5.2 (n=238) 3.8 (n=424) 1.3 (n=1) 6.2 (n=13) Natural disaster (e.g., flood, quake, hurricane, etc.) 4.6 (n=734) 5.2 (n=239) 4.3 (n=481) 1.3 (n=1) 6.2 (n=13) Imprisonment or torture 1.0 (n=153) 2.1 (n=97) 0.5 (n=53) 2.6 (n=2) 0.5 (n=1) Animal attack 3.7 (n=598) 5.0 (n=229) 3.2 (n=357) 2.6 (n=2) 4.8 (n=10) 23.1 (n=3,703) 25.5 (n=1,161) 22.1 (n=2,472) 25.0 (n=19) 24.4 (n=51) Serious accident, fire, or explosion (e.g., an industrial, farm, car, plane, or boating accident) Other (please specify) This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #99 ** The total N includes treatment seeking students who reported having experienced at least 1 trauma experience on the SDS Question #99. 23 Felt the need to reduce your alcohol or drug use (how many times) Overall (%) n=77,522 Male (%) n=27,948 Female (%) n=48,661 Transgender (%) n=271 Self-Identify (%) n=642 Never 72.8 66.6 76.3 72.3 69.2 1 time 10.2 11.1 9.6 12.9 10.9 2-3 times 10.1 12.0 9.0 8.9 12.9 4-5 times 1.8 2.3 1.6 3.0 2.2 More than 5 times 5.1 8.0 3.5 3.0 4.8 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #66 Felt the need to reduce your alcohol or drug use (the last time) Never Within the last two weeks Overall (%) n=16,501 Male (%) n=7,271 Female (%) n=8,988 Transgender (%) n=65 Self-Identify (%) n=177 1.4 1.4 1.5 0.0 1.1 28.5 32.0 26.0 13.8 20.3 Within the last month 18.2 17.9 18.3 18.5 21.5 Within the last year 29.9 29.0 30.5 30.8 35.6 Within the last 1-5 years 18.3 16.4 19.7 32.3 19.2 More than 5 years ago 3.6 3.2 4.0 4.6 2.3 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #67 Others have expressed concern about your alcohol or drug use (how many times) Overall (%) n=77,385 Male (%) n=27,880 Female (%) n=48,587 Transgender (%) n=274 Self-Identify (%) n=644 Never 82.6 77.6 85.5 83.2 80.9 1 time 7.3 8.6 6.6 7.7 8.4 2-3 times 6.1 7.7 5.3 4.0 5.3 4-5 times 1.2 1.5 0.9 2.9 1.6 More than 5 times 2.8 4.6 1.8 2.2 3.9 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #68 Others have expressed concern about your alcohol or drug use (the last time) Overall (%) n=10,328 Male (%) n=4,745 Female (%) n=5,433 Transgender (%) n=44 Self-Identify (%) n=106 Never 1.4 1.3 1.5 0.0 1.9 Within the last two weeks 21.8 23.2 20.8 15.9 17.0 Within the last month 16.4 16.9 16.0 9.1 12.3 Within the last year 32.9 32.4 33.4 31.8 34.9 Within the last 1-5 years 22.3 21.6 22.6 31.8 32.1 More than 5 years ago 5.2 4.7 5.7 11.4 1.9 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #69 24 Received treatment for alcohol or drug use (how many times) Overall (%) n=79,350 Male (%) n=28,491 Female (%) n=49,906 Transgender (%) n=281 Self-Identify (%) n=672 Never 96.1 93.9 97.4 96.8 95.8 1 time 2.9 4.3 2.0 1.4 3.0 2-3 times 0.7 1.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 4-5 times 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 More than 5 times 0.2 0.4 0.1 1.4 0.3 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #70 Received treatment for alcohol or drug use (the last time) Overall (%) n=2,405 Male (%) n=1,346 Female (%) n=1,029 Transgender (%) n=9 Self-Identify (%) n=21 Never 1.7 1.8 1.7 0.0 0.0 Within the last two weeks 9.4 8.7 10.5 10.0 4.8 Within the last month 7.6 7.5 8.0 0.0 0.0 Within the last year 26.8 27.6 26.2 0.0 19.0 Within the last 1-5 years 38.9 39.5 37.1 88.9 66.7 More than 5 years ago 15.6 15.0 16.5 11.1 9.5 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #71 Think back over the last two weeks. How many times have you had: five or more drinks* in a row (for males) OR four or more drinks* in a row (for females)? (*A drink is a bottle of beer, a glass of wine, a wine cooler, a shot glass of liquor, or a mixed drink.) Overall (%) n=64,904 Male (%) n=22,766 Female (%) n=41,332 Transgender (%) n=228 Self-Identify (%) n=578 None 59.1 53.7 61.7 77.2 74.0 Once 17.2 17.2 17.4 12.7 12.5 Twice 11.2 12.6 10.4 4.8 6.1 3 to 5 times 9.6 12.0 8.4 4.8 5.2 6 to 9 times 2.0 2.9 1.5 0.0 1.6 10 or more times 1.0 1.6 0.6 0.4 0.7 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #19 Think back over the last two weeks. How many times have you smoked marijuana? Overall (%) n=74,057 Male (%) n=26,376 Female (%) n=46,782 Transgender (%) n=262 Self-Identify (%) n=637 None 79.3 73.2 82.9 79.4 76.6 Once 5.5 6.1 5.2 8.4 6.0 Twice 3.6 4.3 3.2 3.1 3.5 3 to 5 times 4.6 6.1 3.8 3.1 5.3 6 to 9 times 2.2 3.2 1.7 1.5 1.9 10 or more times 4.7 7.2 3.3 4.6 6.8 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #96 25 Please indicate how much you agree with the statement: “I get the emotional help and support I need from my family.” Overall (%) n=48,407 Male (%) n=16,739 Female (%) n=31,094 Transgender (%) n=174 Self-Identify (%) n=400 Strongly disagree 10.5 9.9 10.7 25.9 20.3 Somewhat disagree 13.7 13.0 14.0 19.0 23.5 19.0 Neutral 15.5 17.3 14.4 17.2 Somewhat agree 31.0 29.9 31.7 24.7 27.0 Strongly agree 29.2 29.9 29.2 13.2 10.3 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #22 Please indicate how much you agree with the statement: “I get the emotional help and support I need from my social network (e.g., friends, acquaintances).” Overall (%) n=50,811 Male (%) n=17,879 Female (%) n=32,341 Transgender (%) n=178 Self-Identify (%) n=413 Strongly disagree 8.5 9.7 7.8 3.4 7.7 Somewhat disagree 13.1 14.4 12.4 10.7 12.1 Neutral 19.2 21.8 17.8 14.0 17.2 Somewhat agree 37.4 34.6 39.0 36.5 40.0 Strongly agree 21.8 19.4 23.0 35.4 23.0 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #23 Are you registered, with the office for disability services on this campus, as having a documented and diagnosed disability? Overall (%) n=79,902 Male (%) n=28,698 Female (%) n=50,255 Transgender (%) n=278 Self-Identify (%) n=671 Yes 7.8 8.4 7.4 12.2 12.1 No 92.2 91.6 92.6 87.8 87.9 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #60 26 If you selected “Yes” for the previous question, please indicate which category of disability you are registered for (check all that apply): Overall (%) Male (%) Female (%) Transgender (%) Self-Identify (%) Attention Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorders 44.3 (n=2,767) 52.1 (n=1,257) 39.6 (n=1,472) 38.2 (n=13) 30.9 (n=25) Deaf or Hard of Hearing 2.7 (n=169) 2.6 (n=63) 2.7 (n=102) 8.8 (n=3) 1.2 (n=1) 24.9 (n=1,558) 24.9 (n=600) 25.1 (n=934) 23.5 (n=8) 19.8 (n=16) Mobility Impairments 3.5 (n=216) 2.8 (n=67) 3.8 (n=140) 5.9 (n=2) 8.6 (n=7) Neurological Disorders 5.7 (n=358) 4.8 (n=116) 6.2 (n=231) 8.8 (n=3) 9.9 (n=8) Physical/Health Related Disorders 11.3 (n=708) 7.7 (n=187) 13.7 (n=508) 2.9 (n=1) 14.8 (n=12) Psychological Disorder/Condition 23.2 (n=1,448) 18.9 (n=457) 25.5 (n=948) 38.2 (n=13) 37.0 (n=30) Visual Impairments 2.7 (n=169) 2.8 (n=67) 2.7 (n=100) 0.0 (n=0) 2.5 (n=2) Other 12.7 (n=796) 12.1 (n=293) 13.0 (n=484) 14.7 (n=5) 17.3 (n=14) Learning Disorders This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #61 Please indicate your level of involvement in organized extra-curricular activities (e.g., sports, clubs, student government, etc.) Overall (%) n=43,221 Male (%) n=15,142 Female (%) n=27,603 Transgender (%) n=151 Self-Identify (%) n=325 None 29.2 31.6 27.9 24.5 27.1 Occasional participation 21.0 22.7 20.1 25.8 22.2 One regularly attended activity 19.7 19.4 19.9 15.2 23.7 Two regularly attended activities 16.5 14.5 17.6 18.5 18.8 Three or more regularly attended activities 13.5 11.8 14.5 15.9 8.3 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #48 Do you participate on an athletic team that competes with other colleges or universities? Overall (%) n=70,131 Male (%) n=25,289 Female (%) n=44,000 Transgender (%) n=257 Self-Identify (%) n=585 Yes 7.2 8.6 6.5 3.9 3.1 No 92.8 91.4 93.5 96.1 96.9 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #50 27 Religious or spiritual preference Overall (%) n=69,171 Male (%) n=24,894 Female (%) n=43,472 Transgender (%) n=240 Self-Identify (%) n=565 Agnostic 12.9 15.4 11.3 22.1 21.9 Atheist 8.6 11.9 6.5 22.1 18.9 Buddhist 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.7 2.1 Catholic 17.6 16.2 18.7 4.6 3.0 Christian 31.9 26.8 35.2 12.9 8.5 Hindu 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 Jewish 2.7 2.7 2.8 1.3 2.1 Muslim 1.3 1.7 1.2 0.4 0.0 No preference 19.3 19.5 19.2 18.8 23.0 Self-Identify 3.8 3.9 3.5 16.3 20.2 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #97 To what extent does your religious or spiritual preference play an important role in your life? Overall (%) n=51,971 Male (%) n=18,207 Female (%) n=33,120 Transgender (%) n=195 Self-Identify (%) n=449 Very important 15.2 12.6 16.7 7.7 8.0 Important 23.5 21.5 24.6 20.5 21.4 Neutral 34.7 35.5 34.2 33.8 35.0 Unimportant 14.7 16.0 13.9 19.5 15.1 Very unimportant 12.0 14.3 10.6 18.5 20.5 Female (%) n=38,571 Transgender (%) n=229 Self-Identify (%) n=527 18.4 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #36 How would you describe your financial situation right now? Overall (%) n=60,653 Male (%) n=21,326 Always stressful 14.8 12.5 16.0 19.2 Often stressful 22.0 20.4 22.8 27.1 27.3 Sometimes stressful 35.3 35.9 35.0 38.0 36.1 Rarely stressful 20.1 22.2 19.1 13.1 14.2 Never stressful 7.7 9.0 7.1 2.6 4.0 Transgender (%) n=152 Self-Identify (%) n=351 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #57 How would you describe your financial situation growing up? Overall (%) n=41,008 Male (%) n=14,130 Female (%) n=26,375 Always stressful 10.6 9.1 11.4 15.1 14.2 Often stressful 15.3 14.0 15.9 20.4 18.2 Sometimes stressful 23.6 22.6 24.1 25.7 23.6 Rarely stressful 28.6 30.3 27.7 25.0 28.8 Never stressful 21.9 24.0 20.9 13.8 15.1 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #58 28 Are you a member of ROTC? Overall (%) n=39,907 Male (%) n=14,219 Female (%) n=25,334 Transgender (%) n=147 Self-Identify (%) n=307 Yes 0.7 1.1 0.5 0.7 0.3 No 99.3 98.9 99.5 99.3 99.7 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #51 Have you ever served in any branch of the US military (active duty, veteran, National Guard or reserves)? Overall (%) n=80,827 Male (%) n=29,147 Female (%) n=50,720 Transgender (%) n=285 Self-Identify (%) n=675 Yes 1.7 3.1 0.9 2.5 1.5 No 98.3 96.9 99.1 97.5 98.5 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #98 Did your military experience include any traumatic or highly stressful experiences which continue to bother you? Overall (%) n=1,232 Male (%) n=807 Female (%) n=410 Transgender (%) n=5 Self-Identify (%) n=10 Yes 31.1 33.7 25.9 40.0 30.0 No 68.9 66.3 74.1 60.0 70.0 This question is from the Standardized Data Set Question #53 29 Provider Data The Standardized Data Set includes some basic demographic information about providers at participating counseling centers. The 2014-2015 dataset represents over 2,771 unique providers. Answer totals vary by question since some counseling centers do not gather this data, or a counselor chose not to answer one or more questions. Gender Highest Degree-Discipline (descending sort) n Percentage (%) n Percentage Male 263 30.7 Counseling Psychology 304 36.1 Female 590 68.8 Clinical Psychology 266 31.6 Transgender 2 0.2 Social Work 88 10.5 Prefer not to answer 2 0.2 Other 71 8.4 Counselor Education 54 6.4 Psychiatry 26 3.1 Marriage and Family Therapist 15 1.8 Community Psychology 6 0.7 Age Average Age Modal Age Age (years) n Nursing 5 0.6 43.1 782 Educational Psychology 5 0.6 32 35 Higher Education 1 0.1 Health Education 1 0.1 Race/Ethnicity n Percentage (%) African-American/Black 68 8.0 American Indian or Alaskan Native 3 0.4 Asian American/Asian 58 6.9 Caucasian/White 619 73.3 Hispanic/Latino/a 51 6.0 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0.0 Multi-racial 29 3.4 Prefer not to answer 5 .6 Other 12 1.4 Are you licensed under your current degree? Yes n=596 72.0% No n=232 28.0% Highest Degree (descending sort) 30 n Percentage (%) Doctor of Philosophy 320 37.6 Master of Arts 121 14.2 Doctor of Psychology 110 12.9 Master of Science 85 10 Master of Social Work 80 9.4 Doctor of Medicine 32 3.8 Bachelor of Arts 30 3.5 Master of Education 23 2.7 Doctor of Education 13 1.5 Other 12 1.4 Bachelor of Science 12 1.4 Nursing (e.g. RN, RNP, PNP) 5 0.6 Education Specialist 4 0.5 Doctor of Osteopathy 3 0.4 Position Type: (descending sort) n Percentage (%) Professional Staff Member 631 73.9 Pre-Doctoral Intern 67 7.8 Doctoral Level Trainee (not an intern) 48 5.6 Master’s Level Trainee 39 4.6 Other 37 4.3 Post-Doctoral Level (non-psychiatric) 30 3.5 Psychiatric Resident 2 0.2 Center Information The information below describes the 139 colleges and universities that contributed data to the 2014-2015 CCMH data set. Does your counseling center currently have an APA accredited What psychiatric services are provided by your center? pre-doctoral training program? n Percentage (%) None 40 29.9 31.1 Part time, in house 61 45.5 68.9 Full time, in house 13 9.7 Part time, off campus consultant 6 4.5 Other 14 10.4 n Percentage (%) Yes 42 No 93 Is your counseling center currently accredited by IACS (International Association of Counseling Services)? n Percentage (%) Yes 65 48.1 No 70 51.9 Does your center have an annual individual psychotherapy limit? n Percentage (%) Yes 49 36.6 No 85 63.4 Which services are integrated with your counseling center? (check all that apply) Career Services n Percentage (%) 13 9.6 If you answered “yes” to session limit, please enter your individual psychotherapy session limit* n Percentage (%) 2 4.1 Disability Services 7 5.2 Drug & Alcohol Treatment Program 39 28.9 8 Employee Assistance Program 2 1.5 10 9 18.4 Learning Services 4 3.0 12 20 40.8 Health Services 19 14.1 14 2 4.1 Testing Services 21 15.6 15 6 12.2 Other 13 9.6 16 4 8.2 17 1 2.0 18 1 2.0 20 3 6.1 24 1 2.0 *No school that provided information entered less than 7 sessions Check each service for which you charge a standard fee (don’t check services that are initially free–e.g., first 8 sessions) n Percentage (%) Intake 2 1.5 Individual Counseling 6 4.4 Group Counseling 6 4.4 Psychiatric Evaluation (initial meeting) 25 18.5 25 18.5 Formal Assessment: Psychological 14 10.4 Formal Assessment: Career 12 8.9 Psychiatric Follow-up (ongoing client) Formal Assessment: Disability 5 3.7 Other 17 12.6 31 Institutional Data Data for the 2014-2015 CCMH data set has been contributed by 139 colleges and universities that hold membership with CCMH. Demographics for these institutions are listed below. Campus Characteristic n Percentage (%) Public 85 63.0 Private 45 33.3 Combined 5 3.7 Northeast (CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT) 36 28.1 Midwest (IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, SD, WI) 35 27.3 South (AL, AR, DE, DC, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV) 42 32.8 West (AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NV, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY) 15 11.7 Under 1,500 4 3.0 1,501-2,500 12 8.9 2,501-5,000 14 10.4 Campus Characteristic 5,001-7,500 12 8.9 Athletic Division 7,501-10,000 15 11.1 None 9 6.8 10,001-15,000 20 14.8 Division I 75 56.8 Type of Institution Location of Campus Enrollment n Percentage (%) 15,001-20,000 16 11.9 Division II 22 16.7 20,001-25,000 16 11.9 Division III 26 19.7 25,001-30,000 6 4.4 30,001-35,000 10 7.4 0-4 132 97.1 35,001-40,000 3 2.2 1-5 0 0 40,001-50,000 5 3.7 0-100 2 1.5 50,001 and over 2 1.5 Other 2 1.5 Grade Scale CCMH Member Institutions 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 32 Abilene Christian University Agnes Scott College American College of Greece American University Amherst College Anderson University Appalachian State University Arkansas State University Auburn University Auburn University, Montgomery Augustana College Aurora University Ball State University Barnard College Barry University Baylor University Binghamton University Boston College 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. Bowling Green State University Brigham Young University Bucknell University Butler University Cabrini College California Maritime Academy California State Polytechnic University, Pomona California State University, Channel Islands California State University, Chico California State University, Fullerton California State University, Long Beach California State University, Sacramento California State University, San Bernardino 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. California State University, San Marcos Calvin College Case Western Reserve University Central College Charleston Southern University Chesnut Hill College Claremont University Consortium Clayton State University Cleveland State University Cleveland State University, Counseling and Academic Success Clinic Coastal Carolina University Colby College Colgate University College of Charleston College of Saint Benedict Saint John’s University 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. College of Southern Nevada College of the Holy Cross College of William & Mary Collin County Community College Colorado Christian University Colorado State University, Fort Collins Columbia College, Chicago Columbia College, Missouri Columbus State University Connecticut College Converse College Culver-Stockton College CUNY College of Staten Island CUNY Hunter College Dartmouth College DePaul University Dickinson College Dominican University Drexel University Duke University East Carolina University East Carolina University, Student Health Services Eastern Illinois University Eastern Kentucky University Eastern Michigan University Eastern Washington University Edgewood College Elon University Emerson College Emmanuel College Emory & Henry College Emory University Fairfield University Ferris State University Florida Atlantic University Florida Gulf Coast University Florida International University Fordham University Fort Lewis College Franklin & Marshall College Fullerton College Gannon University George Mason University Georgia College and State University Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Southern University Georgia State University Gordon College Grand Valley State University Hamilton College Hobart and William Smith Colleges Houghton College Husson University Idaho State University Illinois Institute of Technology Illinois State University Illinois Wesleyan University Iowa State University Ithaca College Jewish Theology Seminary John Brown University 108. Johnson & Wales University, Providence 109. Keele University 110. Kennesaw State University 111. La Salle University 112. Lafayette College 113. Lamar University 114. Lawrence University 115. Lee University 116. Lehigh University 117. Lehman College 118. Lewis Clark State College 119. Lindsey Wilson College 120. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 121. Louisiana State University, Shreveport 122. Loyola Marymount University 123. Loyola University, Chicago 124. Loyola University, New Orleans 125. Lyon College 126. Marquette University 127. Marywood University 128. Mercer University 129. Metropolitan State University of Denver 130. Miami University, Ohio 131. Michigan State University 132. Middle Tennessee State University 133. Mississippi State University 134. Montana State University, Bozeman 135. Montclair State University 136. New College of Florida 137. New Mexico State University 138. North Carolina State University 139. North Central College 140. North Dakota State University 141. Northeastern Illinois University 142. Northern Arizona University 143. Northern Illinois University 144. Northwestern University 145. Ohio State University 146. Ohio University 147. Old Dominion University 148. Oregon Institute of Technology 149. Oregon State University 150. Pace University 151. Pace University, Westchester Campuses 152. Penn State University 153. Penn State University, CEDAR Clinic 154. Pennsylvania College of Technology 155. Pepperdine University 156. Plymouth State University 157. Prince George’s Community College 158. Purdue University, West Lafayette 159. Quincy University 160. Ramapo College of New Jersey 161. Regis University 162. Rhode Island College 163. Rice University 164. Richard Stockton College of New Jersey 165. Ringling College of Art and Design 166. 167. 168. 169. 170. 171. 172. 173. 174. 175. 176. 177. 178. 179. 180. 181. 182. 183. 184. 185. 186. 187. 188. 189. 190. 191. 192. 193. 194. 195. 196. 197. 198. 199. 200. 201. 202. 203. 204. 205. 206. 207. 208. 209. 210. 211. 212. 213. 214. 215. 216. 217. 218. 219. 220. 221. 222. 223. 224. Robert Morris University Rochester Institute of Technology Roger Williams University Rollins College Roosevelt University Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Rutgers University, Camden Sacred Heart University Saddleback College Saint Joseph’s University Saint Mary’s College of California Saint Mary’s College of Maryland Saint Norbert College Salem State University Salisbury University Sam Houston State University San Diego State University Santa Clara University Santa Rosa Junior College Savannah College of Art and Design Scranton University Seton Hall University Shenandoah University Simpson College Slippery Rock University South Dakota State University Southern Illinois University, Carbondale Southern Oregon University Spalding University Springfield College St. Cloud State University St. Edward’s University St. John’s University Stephen F. Austin State University Stetson University Stevenson University Suffolk University SUNY Albany SUNY Brockport SUNY Buffalo SUNY Cortland SUNY Geneseo SUNY Old Westbury SUNY Oneonta SUNY Oswego Susquehanna University Syracuse University Tarleton State University Texas A&M University Texas A&M University, Central Texas Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi Texas A&M University, West Texas Texas State University, San Marcos Texas Tech University The University of Alaska, Fairbanks Towson University Truman State University Tulane University Union College 33 225. 226. 227. 228. 229. 230. 231. 232. 233. 234. 235. 236. 237. 238. 239. 240. 241. 242. 243. 244. 245. 246. 247. 248. 249. 250. 251. 252. 253. 254. 255. 256. 257. 258. 259. 260. 261. 262. 263. 34 University at Buffalo University of Akron University of Alabama University of Alberta University of Arkansas, Fayetteville University of British Columbia University of California, Berkeley University of California, Davis University of California, Irvine University of California, Los Angeles University of California, Merced University of California, Riverside University of California, San Diego University of California, San Francisco University of California, Santa Barbara University of California, Santa Cruz University of Cambridge University of Central Florida University of Central Missouri University of Central Oklahoma University of Chicago University of Cincinnati University of Colorado, Boulder University of Colorado, Denver University of Connecticut University of Dayton University of Delaware University of Denver University of Florida University of Houston University of Houston, Clear Lake University of Idaho University of Illinois, Chicago University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign University of Iowa University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City University of Kentucky University of Maine University of Massachusetts, Boston 264. University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth 265. University of Massachusetts, Lowell 266. University of Memphis 267. University of Miami 268. University of Michigan 269. University of Michigan, Flint 270. University of Missouri 271. University of Missouri, Kansas City 272. University of Nebraska, Kearney 273. University of Nevada, Reno 274. University of New Brunswick 275. University of New Hampshire 276. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 277. University of North Carolina, Charlotte 278. University of North Carolina, Greensboro 279. University of North Carolina, Pembroke 280. University of North Florida 281. University of North Texas 282. University of Northern Iowa 283. University of Notre Dame 284. University of Oregon 285. University of Pennsylvania 286. University of Richmond 287. University of Saint Joseph 288. University of San Francisco 289. University of Sheffield 290. University of South Carolina, Columbia 291. University of South Florida, St. Petersburg 292. University of South Florida, Tampa 293. University of Southern Maine 294. University of Southern Mississippi 295. University of Tennessee, Knoxville 296. University of Texas, Arlington 297. University of Texas, Austin 298. University of Texas, Dallas 299. University of Texas, San Antonio 300. University of the Sciences, Philadelphia 301. 302. 303. 304. 305. 306. 307. 308. 309. 310. 311. 312. 313. 314. 315. 316. 317. 318. 319. 320. 321. 322. 323. 324. 325. 326. 327. 328. 329. 330. 331. 332. 333. 334. 335. 336. 337. University of the South University of Utah University of Washington, Seattle University of Washington, Tacoma University of Waterloo University of West Florida University of West Georgia University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire University of Wisconsin, Madison University of Wisconsin, Parkside University of Wisconsin, Platteville University of Wisconsin, River Falls University of Wisconsin, Stout University of Wisconsin, Whitewater University of Wyoming Ursinus College Valparaiso University Vanderbilt University Virginia Commonwealth University Virginia Military Institute Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Wake Forest University Washington State University Washington State University, Vancouver Wayne State University Weber State University West Chester University West Virginia University Western Carolina University Western Connecticut State University Western Illinois University Western Kentucky University Western New England University Western Washington University Winthrop University Wright State University Yeshiva University 35 Contact Information Center for Collegiate Mental Health Penn State University 501 Student Health Center University Park, PA 16802 Phone: 814-865-1419 Email: ccmh@psu.edu Web: ccmh.psu.edu 36