VERDICT FORM

We, the jury, present the following answers to the questions
submitted by the Court:

1. Under the instructions provided by the Court, have Plaintiffs proven
by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendant Ford was negligent in
failing to adequately warn Joyce Stockton and was such negligence a
cause ot'Joyce Stockton?s injuries and damages?

Yes 

2. Under the instructions provided by the Court, have Planltiffs proven
by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendant Ford was negligent in
the design of its products and was such negligence a cause of Joyce
Stockton?s injuries and damages?

3. Under the instructions provided by the Court, have Plaintiffs proven
by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendant Ford?s products were
defective or unreasonably dangerous at the time they left Defendant
Ford?s control and, if so, were such products a cause of Joyce Stockton?s
injuries and damages?

Yes .No 
{fyou answered "Yes, to either Question I, 2 or 3, continue on to
Question 4. If you answered ?No, to Questions I, 2 and 3, please Sign
and date the verdict form; you do not need to answer the remaining
Questions-

Page 1 of 6

4. Under the instructions provided by the Court, do you ?nd that
Defendant Ford has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the
following persons or entities were negligent and that such negligence was
a cause of Stookton?s injuries?

Ronnie Stockton Yes No 

(Party Plaintiff)

BorgdWarner Corporation Yes No 
(Non-Party)

Georgia?Paci?c Corporation Yes No 

(Non-Party)

Honeywell Intemational, Ind-(Bendix) Yes! No 
(Non-Party)

Sears, Roebuck 85 Co. Yes No 
(Non?Party)

Page 2 of 6

S. Assign. to each person or entity listed below the percentage of fault,
if any, you attribute in causing Joyce Stookton?s injuries and damages.

Ford i 
(Party Defendant)

Ronnie Stockton I 
(Party Plaintiff)

Borg? Warner Corporation 0_ 
(Non-Party)

Georgia-Paci?c Corporation 
(Non?Party)

Honeywell International, Inc. (Bendix) OI 
(Non-Party)

Sears, Roebuck Co. 
(NomParty)

Total must equal 100%

Page 3 of 5

6. Please set forth the amount of damages, if any, that Plaintiffs have
proven by a preponderance of the evidence in each of the following
categories for Joyce Stockton:
A. Physical pain and suffering?past 
B. Physical pain and suffering?future _i
C. Permanent impairment 5314;3333
D. Loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life?past $i?9m
E. Loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life?e?it?ure W5le 
F. Medicalcare services to date  
G. Future medical care services Value of earning capac1ty lost? past :2 11 Slab: ?a .

1. Value of earning capacity 

Page 4 of 6

7. Please set forth the amount of damages, if any, that Plaintiffs have
proven by a preponderance of the evidence in each of the following
categories [or Ronnie Stockton:

A. The reasonable value of the Joyce Stockton?s companionship and
acts of love and affection Ronnie Stockton has lost past

55 sea

B. The reasonable value of the Joyce Stockton?s companionship and
acts of love and affection Ronnie Stockton has lost ?future

sun.be

- If you married damages in response to Question 6, please answer
Question 8. Ifyou did not award damages in reaponse to Question 6,
please Sign and date the verdict form; you do not need to answer the
remaining Questions.

Page 5 of 6

8. Under the instructions provided by the Court, have Plaintiffs proven
by clear and convincing evidence that the actions of Ford constituted
reckless conduct against Joyce Stockton?

Yes__ 

Ifyon answered ?Yes, to Question 8, please answer Question 9. Ifyon
answered "No, to Question 8, piease Sign and date the .verdz'otform; you
do not need to answer the remaining Question-

9. If the answer to Question 8 is ?yes,? state the total amount of
punitive damages, if any, to be assessed against Ford. 95 gas .QDL 2

Datedzi lug 

memes

Foreperson

Page 6 of