● 12/15/10 Gang unit in the Spring Valley area, four hours on the case, no other
details
● 1/31/11 Robbery unit with possible kidnapping charge/domestic violence case
described as bogus on tracking log, unable to locate the phone. Exigent? Yes.
● 10/22/11 Robbery unit with a possible kidnapping as a possible other crime,
probable cause, no warrant, it took 15 minutes to locate the Cricket phone, suspect was
arrested. Exigent? Yes
● 12/14/11 Gang unit, target located but not arrested, two hours to locate Cricket
phone, noted on document “1st ‘real’ mission-successful.”
● 12/20/11 Robbery unit/southeast, looking for a Cricket phone owned by the
victim. Exigent? Not shown
● 12/20/11 No unit named, may be related to robbery unit/southeast, kidnapping
“victim showed up and said it was all false.” Exigent? Not indicated.
● 12/20/11 District Attorney, tracking an AT&T phone, allegations of a child
abduction, phone located in twenty minutes, no arrest. Exigent circumstances not
indicated.
● 3/8/12 Robbery unit, additional charge of attempted murder, T-mobile phone
located in three hours (it was off for some time) no arrest. No exigent listed.
● 7/10/12 Robbery unit, additional charge of home invasion, Sprint phone located
in two hours for three different days, arrest was made. No exigent listed.
● 10/17/12 Robbery unit three, possible torture involved, Cricket cell located and
target arrested. No exigent circumstances indicated on the form.
● 12/4/12 Robbery unit, no additional information.
● 1/4/13 Robbery unit, Cricket phone from 619 area code located in sixty minutes,
arrest made, 10 Verizon phones listed on tracking log. Exigent? Yes.
● 5/22/13 Robbery unit, allegation of kidnapping as well, 70th and University area,
T-Mobile phone located, probable cause for arrest but no arrest was made. Exigent?
Yes.
● 9/5/13 Robbery unit, other: “attempt murder” no information on locating phone,
arrest or location, no search warrant indicated.
● 10/1/13 Homicide unit, target was located on 45th Street in San Diego, ten
minutes to locate a Sprint cell phone connected to target. No indication of exigent
circumstances.
● 11/20/13 Robbery/unit three, unable to locate a AT&T phone in eight various
locations in San Diego, El Cajon. Exigent? No.
● 2/10/14 Robbery unit in East San Ysidro found target with a Cricket cell phone,
took five minutes to locate the phone, no arrest, no probable cause, no exigent
mentioned.
● 2/15/14 Robbery unit, other crimes, “case-confidential” In the El Cajon area an
AT&T cell phone, no description of results. Exigent? Yes.
● 3/27/14 Robbery unit, in South Park area, Cricket cell phone not located after 20
minutes, no arrests, no warrants issued. Exigent? No.
● 6/9/14 Northern Division, no unit indicated, T-Mobile phone with probable cause,
it took sixty minutes to locate the phone. Exigent? Yes. No further information.
● 7/9/14 Identified as Team 3, North County, Verizon cell phone, arrest warrant.
Exigent? Yes. No further details on results.

 ● 10/9/14 SIU, Northeast Escondido, tracking AT&T cell phone, they have an arrest
warrant, no further information.
● 1/20/15 Robbery unit, possible attempted murder, cell phone in the area of Front
Street and Ivy, probable cause for arrest but none made, no further details on phone
tracking. Exigent? No.
● 2/17/15 SIU, Chula Vista, looking for a Sprint cell phone, they located the phone
in fifteen minutes, found the target, who was arrested. Exigent? No.
● 3/3/15 Robbery unit,10th& F Street, Sprint cell phone sought with a probable
cause, no arrest warrant, target not located, no other details, they go again the next day
looking for suspect. Exigent? Yes.
● 3/4/15 Robbery unit, 10th & F Street, Sprint cell phone located in one hour but not
the target. Exigent? Yes.