CASE Document 136 Filed 03/09/16 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Lisa Scott,
Plaintiff,
v. Civil No. 13-2616 
SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
CSL Plasma, Inc.,
Defendant.

We, the jury, answer the questions put to us on this Verdict Form as follows:

Question 1. Did Plaintiff Lisa Scott prove by the greater weight of the evidence that Defendant
CSL Plasma, Inc. refused to do business with her because she is transgender?

ES

es or No

Note: Complete the following question only ifyour answer to Question I is ?Yes. if
your anmer to Question I is ?no, have yonrforeperson sign and date this form
because you have completed your deliberation.

meetion 2. Did Defendant CSL Plasma, Inc. prove by the greater weight of the evidence that
it deferred the Plaintiff as a plasma donor beea of a legitimate business purpose?

    

es or No

Note: Complete the following questions only ifyour answer to Question 2 is ?No. 13?"
your enmer to Question 2 is ?yes, have yourforeperson sign and dare iizisform
because you have completed your deliberation.

Question 3. We ?nd the Plaintiff?s compensatory damages to be:

Actual damages: (State the amount or, if none, write the
word ?none.?)

Multiplier: (State a not less than 1 or greater than 3.)

 

 

56W NE 
MAR 4.2015

us qgamt COURT was

 

 

 

CASE Document 136 Filed 03/09/16 Page 2 of 2

Question 4. We ?nd the Plaintiff?s damages for mental anguish or su?ering to be:

3 (State the amount or, if none, write the word 

SIGI SIGNATURE BEDAGTEIJ 

 

SIGN AND DATE THIS FORM.

Dated: 

 

SIGN SIGNATURE BEIJAGTED