BOB EDWARDS, HOST: Of the 533 current members of Congress 282 are Republicans and 250 are Democrats. A quick bit of math reveals that leaves one seat for Vermont's Congressman Bernie Sanders, the body's Independent. He's a socialist in his fourth term. House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt named Sanders the ranking minority member on a Government Reform and Oversight Subcommittee. Sanders says taking the top Democratic spot on a subcommittee does not undercut his Independent status; it enhances it. U.S. REPRESENTATIVE BERNIE SANDERS (I-VT): For the first time in, probably, American history somebody who's outside of the two-party system is going to have a little bit more clout by being a ranking member of one of the important subcommittees in the Government Reform Committee. EDWARDS: Why did you want that role which, more closely than ever, allies you with the Democratic Party? SANDERS: Well, that's the committee that I was on, and that's the seniority situation that I was eligible for. EDWARDS: But, doesn't this ally you... SANDERS: Well, I think if you look at my record in the United States Congress, you will find that, as the only Independent, I have led the effort against both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party and that my effort is to speak up for working people and low-income people and elderly people who are not getting a fair shake from government. So, I would suggest that, if anyone checks my record, you'll find that it is probably as strong and as progressive as any member of the United States Congress. EDWARDS: So, if the Republicans had offered you a subcommittee chairmanship you would have gladly accepted? SANDERS: No, of course, I would not have. The Republican agenda, by and large, is to represent the wealthiest people and the most powerful people in this country. While I have many disagreements with the Democrats, obviously, given the choice between the two, the Democratic situation and positions are often preferable. EDWARDS: In fact, you've voted with the Democratic majority 95 percent of the time. What's the difference between a socialist and a liberal Democrat? SANDERS: Well, I'm glad that you asked me that. Number one, it's the issues that I raise and the issues that I fight for. Number one, one of the problems that we're having in this country today is that in many ways we are ceasing to be a democracy. Now, this is an issue that Democrats don't talk about; Republicans don't talk about and the corporately-own media doesn't talk about. But one of the real problems that we have is that tens of millions of people are giving up on the political process, because they perceive that the United States Congress and the government ends up representing the wealthy and the powerful and not the needs of ordinary people. And we don't talk about this. Two years ago when Gingrich and his friends took over 38 percent of the people voted; in a very important presidential election 49 percent of the people voted. My guess is that in two years, in the next congressional election, you'll have barely more than one-third of the people voting. Now, that's a very serious problem. We have seen in the last 20, 25 years a significant decline in the standard of living of working people, the collapse of the middle class. Who's talking for those people? Certainly not the Republican party, which very overtly represents the wealthy and the powerful and, unfortunately, most members of the Democratic party are not standing... EDWARDS: So... SANDERS: ... for working people either. EDWARDS: So, why not become a Democrat, change the party from within as you move up to more power within that party. SANDERS: Well, I prefer and believe very strongly that, at this moment in history, the Congress needs at least one Independent who stands up and calls it the way it is. EDWARDS: The congressional leadership is much more conservative now, even within the Republican Party, since you first entered Congress. Has that changed how other members relate to you? SANDERS: Well, what is going on -- it's not congressional leadership. You have seen in the United States Congress a strong drift to the right in both political parties. You have now a right-wing of the Republican Party which clearly controls that party, which is far further than -- to the right, than was the case 15 or 20 years ago; and you have a Democratic leadership now which, in some respects, might be considered to be liberal Republican. President Clinton, for example, his politics in many ways, excluding Watergate and so forth, is not terribly different than was Richard Nixon's. So, you're seeing both parties moving to the right, which means to say that the needs of working people, low-income people, the elderly, the kids, are just not being dealt with. And that is an opening that I think many of us have got to see. EDWARDS: So, there's very little that Congress has achieved of late that you could be proud of? SANDERS: Well, I would say that some of us in the progressive caucus played a role in stopping the worst elements of what Gingrich wanted to do. And that's something to be proud of. Last year, we ended up putting more money into education. And that's something that we are very proud of. But, I think it's fair to say -- and most Americans, I'm sure, do not disagree -- that the Congress represents the wealthy and the powerful. The middle class shrinks. We have the highest rate of childhood poverty in the industrialized world. And the rich get richer. We're not going to change that system until tens and tens of millions of working people get involved in the political process and they fight. Free national health care system, which guarantees health care to all people -they fight for the life for every kid in this country to be able to get a decent college education. We fight for a fair tax system, which asks the question why the wealthiest are paying lower taxes, their tax rates have gone down, while the middle class pays more, because social security taxes have gone up. This is a great country. There are many things that we can do. The basic problem is both your economic and political system are dominated by big money interest. EDWARDS: And socialism hasn't exactly been gaining ground in recent years. How does you ideas... SANDERS: Well, Democrat Socialism, in fact, is not communism. And I hope you understand that. I was a very strong opponent of authoritarian communism, of course. In terms of Democratic Socialism, the Labour Party in England is now 20 to 30 points ahead of the conservatives; will probably become the next government of -- of England. You have Labour party in Sweden in power; you have labour -- New Democratic Party in power in provinces in Canada. So, you know, things go up and down, but Democratic Socialism is alive and thriving. EDWARDS: Yeah, but how do you square your idea of socialism with that of Congress and the American people since politicians seem to drift the way they feel the -- the voters are going? SANDERS: Well, I don't feel -- well, I was elected by 23 points in the last election in the state of Vermont. So I suppose the voters are not unhappy with -- with what I'm doing. I think if you had more members of Congress -- it's not, it's not -- you know, I think your question is not right. It's not where the voters are going. I think, many politicians proceed where the money goes. To get elected, you have to get money from wealthy people and large corporations and you do what they want. That means you fight for tax breaks for the rich and you cut Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security and education. I think the views that I reflect and represent not only reflect the interest of the vast majority of the people in Vermont, but the vast majority of the people nationwide. Now, why those views are not better represented in Congress has to do with the corporate media which, to a large degree, does not allow those view out. Number two, it has to do with a two-party system, which is heavily controlled by big money interest. EDWARDS: Congressman Bernie Sanders, is a socialist from Vermont. Copyright © 1997 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions page at www.npr.org for further information. NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.