SPEECH
PRESS CONFERENCE
Chronology
The events leading up to the death of 24-year-old Jamar Clark in the early morning hours of
November 15, 2015 occurred near 1611 Plymouth Avenue in North Minneapolis. The addresses
on the south side of this block consist of an apartment building attached by a breezeway to
townhomes. The Elks Lodge is located across the street from 1611 Plymouth, on the north side
of the block. November 15th was a warm night and many residents were out on the balconies on
the south side of Plymouth Avenue. Patrons of the Elks Lodge, a social club, were starting to
leave the establishment.
Party for Nekelia Sharp
On the evening of November 14, 2015, a number of friends and family were hosting a birthday
party for Nekelia Sharp, age 39, in apartment 103 at 1611 Plymouth Ave. Jamar Clark was
present with his girlfriend, RayAnn Hayes, age 41, and a number of his relatives. Late in the
evening, Sharp and her husband started arguing in the hallway. RayAnn Hayes attempted to
break up the argument and Jamar Clark grabbed Hayes. Hayes and Clark fought as well and
Hayes injured her ankle in the fight. During this altercation both Clark and Hayes suffered facial
wounds which bled.
Call for Ambulance
At 12:20 a.m. on November 15th, RayAnn Hayes called 911 and asked for paramedics to come to
her daughter’s apartment. EMS paramedics Tyler Haskell and Wesley Thompson responded to
the call. They parked their ambulance on the south side of Plymouth Avenue in front of 1611
Plymouth. The paramedics entered the building and went to Apartment 204, where they found
Hayes. She was intoxicated and unable to walk. Her lip was split, she had bruising on her left
eye, and an abrasion on her nose.
The paramedics put Hayes into a “stair chair” to carry her down the stairs. As paramedics
carried Hayes out of the building, they saw Clark standing outside crying and “acting kind of
odd.” As they walked past Clark, Hayes said “that’s the guy who did this to me.”
Call for Police Backup
The paramedics radioed for police back up because the apparent assailant was on the scene. As
the paramedics were transferring Hayes to a stretcher to load her into the ambulance, Clark
approached them saying he was her son. Hayes said he was not her son. Clark then began
calling paramedic Thompson a “pussy” and “bitch” and told Hayes that he was going to come
see her. The paramedics loaded Hayes into the ambulance and locked the doors. Thompson and
Haskell were very afraid at this point.
Clark began knocking on the ambulance doors and trying to get into the ambulance.

EMS Supervisor Arrives
Shortly after Hayes and the paramedics locked themselves in the ambulance, EMS Deputy Chief
Michael Trullinger, who was aware of the paramedics’ call for police assistance, arrived on the
scene. Trullinger saw Clark tapping on the back of the ambulance, saying his mother was in
there. Clark said his name was Darius. Clark alternated between throwing his hands in the air and
putting his hands in his pockets. Trullinger, a Marine veteran, was concerned by Clark’s body
language. Trullinger asked Clark to step aside; Clark moved a few steps away but kept fidgeting
1

 and putting his hands in his pockets. Clark was wearing a long-sleeved sweatshirt and a jacket.
Trullinger noted that Clark was crying at times and his emotions appeared to be rapidly
changing. Because of new security features in the ambulance, the paramedics could not move
from the patient area to the driver’s area without first getting out of the side of the ambulance. In
other words, the ambulance carrying Hayes could not leave for the hospital because the driver
was effectively trapped in the rear and they felt they could not exit safely while Clark remained
at the back of the ambulance.
MPD Officers Arrive
MPD Officers Schwarze and Ringgenberg arrived on the scene from the 4th Precinct
stationhouse, which is only 3 blocks away. They parked behind EMS Supervisor Trullinger’s
Suburban. Because the officers were so close to 1611 Plymouth and the call was for ambulance
assistance, they did not activate lights and sirens which, in turn, means that their squad’s video
cameras were not automatically activated. Trullinger met the officers and told them that the
person in the ambulance was assaulted by the person up on the curb who was also interfering
with the paramedics.
At 12:49 a.m. on November 15th, Officers Ringgenberg and Schwarze approached Clark and
noticed his hands were in his jacket pockets. They told him to take his hands out of his pockets.
He refused. Ringgenberg then took his gun out and held it down alongside his leg with the barrel
pointing to the ground. He did not point it at Clark or anyone else. Clark started yelling, “What’s
the pistol for?” The officers again and repeatedly told Clark to take his hands out of his jacket
pockets. Clark continued to refuse to do so. Ringgenberg put his gun back in his holster and
grabbed Clark’s right wrist while Schwarze grabbed Clark’s left hand. Schwarze had his
handcuffs out but said he was never able to get them on Clark. In the ensuing struggle, Schwarze
dropped his handcuffs.
Ringgenberg had been trained in his prior work as a police officer in San Diego to take a suspect
to the ground when he or she resisted being handcuffed because it was believed to be safer.
After Clark resisted being handcuffed, Ringgenberg quickly reached his arm around Clark’s
chest and neck and took him to the ground. This occurred at 12:49:29 a.m. Ringgenberg landed
on his side on top of Clark, who was on his back.
Clark Grabs for Ringgenberg’s Gun
Ringgenberg said he tried to move away from Clark to get in position to handcuff him. 1
Ringgenberg felt his gun go from his right hip to the small of his back and told Schwarze, “He’s
got my gun.” Ringgenberg said he reached back to the top of his gun and felt Clark’s “whole”
hand on the gun. Ringgenberg repeatedly told his partner Schwarze, “He’s got my gun, he’s got
my gun.” Ringgenberg recalled hearing Schwarze tell Clark to let go of the gun or Schwarze
would shoot. Ringgenberg heard Clark say, “I’m ready to die.” Ringgenberg said, “That was the
worst feeling ever because, it just, my heart just sank.” Ringgenberg believed he was going to die
at that point because he had no control over his gun. Ringgenberg felt that Clark didn’t care
what happened to him and remembered thinking that he didn’t want his partner to die with his
gun. After Ringgenberg heard the round go off he remembered being able to roll away.
Schwarze said that as the officers approached Clark he had “this thousand yard stare.” 2
Schwarze said that after Ringgenberg used the takedown maneuver, Schwarze maintained
control of Clark’s left hand and was waiting for Ringgenberg to turn Clark over so they could
1
2

Transcript of Statement of Officer Mark Ringgenberg (MPD) to BCA; Nov. 17, 2015.
Transcript of Statement of Officer Dustin Schwarze (MPD) to BCA; Nov. 17, 2015.

2

 handcuff him. Schwarze heard Ringgenberg say, “He’s got my gun” in a very “stern, excited like
very serious” tone. Schwarze, who had his handcuffs out, then dropped the handcuffs on the
ground and took out his gun. Schwarze said he put the gun to the edge of Clark’s mouth and
said, “Let go or I’m gonna shoot you.” Schwarze recalled Clark looking directly at him and
saying, “I’m ready to die.” Schwarze said the “only thing I could think of to do was to save our
lives and anyone else in the immediate area so I pulled the trigger.” Schwarze said the gun did
not fire because the slide was partially pulled back. Schwarze heard Ringgenberg saying “Shoot
him” in a panicked voice so Schwarze pulled the trigger again and the gun fired. Clark was shot
approximately 61 seconds after first being confronted by the officers.
EMS Activity after Officers’ Arrival
Trullinger briefed the officers on the situation. Trullinger then went into the ambulance
containing Hayes and the other paramedics. When the police first arrived. He asked Hayes if
the person outside was her son. She said he was not, he was her boyfriend and that he had beaten
her up. Trullinger and the paramedics then heard the gunshot. They hit the floor momentarily
and then Trullinger looked out to see the officers standing up and spread apart. Trullinger saw
Clark was on his back on the ground bleeding with his arms to the side and Trullinger called for
another ambulance. The ambulance with Hayes then left for North Memorial Medical Center.
Trullinger rushed to Clark, checked his pulse and then ran to his truck to retrieve his trauma bag.
Trullinger noticed a pair of handcuffs on the ground near Clark, somewhere around Clark’s hips.
Additional Ambulance Response
HCMC paramedics Mari Hill and Tyler Lupkes responded to the scene, arriving at 12:54:49 a.m.
and saw Trullinger assisting Clark. Hill asked MPD Officer Reimer for help checking Clark for
weapons; no weapons were found. As EMS paramedics Hill and Lupkes went to move Clark to
a stretcher, they noticed open handcuffs in the grass near Clark’s right side. Lupkes grabbed the
handcuffs by the hinge and moved them out of the way so the paramedics could get Clark on to
the stretcher.

Clark was loaded onto the stretcher and then
quickly into the ambulance and taken to Hennepin County Medical Center (HCMC).
Ringgenberg and Schwarze Taken to 4th Precinct
Off. Sworski of the 4th Precinct, arrived at the scene within minutes of the shooting. The scene
had become very chaotic with 50-60 people in the immediate area, many yelling at the police.
With other officers arriving to take control of the scene, Sworski was concerned for the safety of
Schwarze and Ringgenberg so he removed them from the scene. Sworski took possession of
Schwarze’s firearm and moved Schwarze and Ringgenberg to his squad. Schwarze was placed
in the front seat and Ringgenberg in the back. They did not discuss the shooting on the short ride
to the 4th Precinct.
3

 At the precinct, Schwarze and Ringgenberg were placed in separate offices. Each officer was
later read a public safety statement which is meant to determine whether there is a weapon
missing or other immediate safety concern related to the use of force. Schwarze said that he
fired his weapon and that his handcuffs were missing.
Crime scene technicians later took photos of Schwarze and Ringgenberg, collected their
firearms, as well as Ringgenberg’s duty belt for forensic examination. Their uniforms were not
collected at that time, but were collected later.
Crime Scene Processing
After Clark was transported by ambulance and the scene was secured, crime scene technicians
examined the area where Clark was shot. They recovered a pair of handcuffs with the clasps
open, medical items, and car keys from the Schwarze/Ringgenberg squad.
The ambulance used to transport Hayes was taken to the MPD Forensic Garage. The ambulance
was processed for fingerprints and DNA and the video was recovered. The video from the
second ambulance used to transport Clark was also later recovered.
MPD crime lab personnel also went to HCMC and photographed Clark including photos of
Clark’s wrists.
A number of witnesses were identified at the scene. Those witnesses were transported to the
homicide unit at the Minneapolis Police Department where homicide investigators conducted
audio recorded interviews.
Several items of video evidence were also obtained. These include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

video from the back of the ambulance in which RayAnn Hayes was
transported;
video from the back of the ambulance in which Jamar Clark was transported;
video from a public housing camera;
video from a police pole camera;
video from 54 squad cars that responded to the scene after the fact;
video and audio from a squad car in which Officers Ringgenberg and
Schwarze were transported to the 4th Precinct;
video from Danny Braylock;
video from a known adult female; and
hard drive from the Elks Lodge camera later determined to be inoperable.

Autopsy of Jamar Clark
Jamar Clark died on November 16, 2015 at 9:32 p.m. The next day, November 17, 2015, an
autopsy was conducted by Hennepin County Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Andrew Baker. The
cause of death was a gunshot wound to the head. A toxicology examination showed that Clark
had a Blood Alcohol Content of .09; he also had THC in his system.
Dr. Baker carefully examined Clark’s wrists externally and internally and determined that there
were “no occult contusions [bruises], or other injuries suggestive of restraint.”
In other words there was no evidence of injuries from handcuffs.
4

 BCA and U.S. Department of Justice Investigation
Early on the morning of November 16th, pursuant to a recently adopted MPD policy, the
Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) took over the investigation into the death of
Jamar Clark. Later that same day, Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges asked the United States
Department of Justice (DOJ) to join the investigation into the death of Jamar Clark. That
investigation included 121 BCA reports totaling 1370 pages, an autopsy, 21 DNA lab reports and
97 MDP supplemental reports. There are additional federal reports as well.
Hennepin County Attorney’s Office Review
The BCA submitted its report to the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office on February 10, 2016
for consideration of possible criminal charges. As is common practice, the HCAO requested
additional investigation, which the BCA promptly completed.
On March 16, 2016, I announced that the charging decision on officer-involved use of deadly
force cases resulting in death would no longer be submitted to a grand jury. Instead the County
Attorney would make that determination as is done with all other criminal cases submitted to the
office.
I have reviewed this case together with three senior prosecutors and on March 30, 2016 issued
this Report.

5

 THE EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT JAMAR CLARK WAS NOT HANDCUFFED
WHEN HE WAS SHOT
One of the primary issues in this case, and an important focus of the BCA and FBI investigation,
is whether Jamar Clark was handcuffed. There is no dispute that Officer Ringgenberg took Clark
to the ground. It is also clear that Ringgenberg was on top of Clark after they went to the ground
and remained there until Clark was shot. The question is whether Clark was handcuffed at the
time he was taken to the ground and shot.
There are conflicting eyewitness accounts regarding the presence of handcuffs. Ringgenberg,
Schwarze and 10 other paramedic or law enforcement witnesses who observed Clark at the scene
have stated Clark was not handcuffed. By contrast, twenty civilian witnesses who provided
information regarding handcuffs gave differing versions: two said Clark was not handcuffed, six
were uncertain if Clark was handcuffed, and twelve were certain Clark was handcuffed. These
twelve disagreed as to whether Clark was handcuffed with his hands in front, or with his hands
behind him and several said they were attached to only one wrist.
It is not unusual after a traumatic event to have differing and often contradictory eyewitness
statements. The fact that statements are contradictory does not necessarily mean that witnesses
are lying. In such cases prosecutors look to forensic and other objective evidence to determine
what happened.
In addition to the lack of physical injuries to his wrists, which would have occurred during a
violent struggle if he had been handcuffed, other forensic evidence established that Clark was not
handcuffed.
Laboratory testing found the presence of Clark’s DNA on Ringgenberg’s duty belt and grip of
Ringgenberg’s gun. The forensic evidence that Clark grabbed Ringgenberg’s holster is also
strong corroboration that Clark was not handcuffed behind his back, as described by several of
the witnesses, because he would have been unable to grab at Ringgenberg’s holster and gun if he
had been handcuffed.
1. Photos At The Hospital Showed No Handcuff Injuries on Clark
On November 15, 2015, at 3:32 a.m., while the Minneapolis Police Department was still
conducting the initial investigation, Homicide Sgt. Chris Karakostas visited Clark in the
Intensive Care Unit at HCMC. Karakostas did not see any injuries on Clark’s wrists and took
photos of Clark’s wrists on his department issued phone. Photographing the wrists was made
difficult by the presence of the IV lines and hospital identification bracelets.

6

 Left Wrist

Right Wrist

HCMC 11-15-15 3:32 a.m.

HCMC 11-15-15 3:32 a.m.

Sgt. Karakostas asked another sergeant to arrange for the crime lab to take additional photos with
better cameras. On November 15, 2015 at 7:16 a.m., MPD Forensic Scientist Michael Schultz
went to HCMC and photographed Jamar Clark with particular attention to Clark’s wrists. Those
photos, taken approximately 6 hours after the incident, also show no handcuff injuries on Clark’s
wrists.
Left Wrist

Right Wrist

HCMC 11-15-15 7:16 a.m.

HCMC 11-15-15 7:16 a.m.

The documented absence of obvious handcuff injuries hours after the incident is important
corroboration that Clark was not handcuffed at the time he was shot.
2. Autopsy Showed No Handcuff Injuries on Clark
On November 17, 2015, Chief Hennepin County Medical Examiner, Dr. Andrew Baker,
performed an autopsy on Jamar Clark. Dr. Baker examined Clark’s wrists and determined that
there were “no occult contusions [bruises], or other injuries suggestive of restraint.” Dr. Baker’s
finding of no internal or external signs of handcuff injuries is consistent with the photos taken of
Clark’s wrists at the hospital.
This forensic medical evidence also strongly corroborates the statements of the officers that
Clark was not handcuffed at the time he was struggling with Ringgenberg and was not
handcuffed at the time he was shot.

7

 3. Forensic Examination of the Handcuffs
Schwarze’s handcuffs were found in the grass near where Jamar Clark was shot.

The handcuffs were recovered by MPD Forensic Scientist Nicole Lenway and ultimately taken
to the BCA for forensic testing. The inside of the handcuffs were swabbed and examined for
DNA. There was “insufficient genetic information” for any forensic comparison.
Blood was found on the outside of the handcuffs and testing revealed that it was a match to
Clark. The blood spatter on the handcuffs was Clark’s. All of the spatter was located on one
side of the handcuffs. This is consistent with the officers’ statements that the cuffs were never
on Clark. Having fallen to the ground during the struggle, one would expect blood spatter only
on one side. Further, had Clark been handcuffed behind his back it seems highly unlikely blood
could have spattered on to the cuffs as the entrance wound was toward the front of Clark’s head
and there was no exit wound. Clark’s body would have shielded the cuffs from blood under those
circumstances.
Officers Ringgenberg and Schwarze gave statements that they attempted to handcuff Clark but
never succeeded which is why Schwarze’s handcuffs were out and found at the scene. The
officers’ statements are strongly corroborated by the forensic evidence.
DNA Evidence Shows Clark Grabbed Ringgenberg’s Holster and Gun
After Clark was taken to the hospital, Ringgenberg and Schwarze were taken to the police station
and separated. Crime lab technicians were dispatched to the police station and Forensic Scientist
Nicole Lenway collected Ringgenberg’s firearm. When Lenway asked Ringgenberg the standard
questions about whether there were any DNA transfers, Ringgenberg said that Clark had grabbed
at his holster and his gun. Lenway then collected Ringgenberg’s duty belt as well.
DNA swabs to be used as known samples were collected from Ringgenberg and Schwarze as
well as other first responders at the scene. A known DNA sample was also collected from Jamar
Clark. Those DNA samples together with the two firearms and Ringgenberg’s duty belt were
submitted to the BCA laboratory for forensic examination.
Forensic DNA testing of Ringgenberg’s duty belt showed mixtures of DNA in several areas.
Jamar Clark’s DNA was found on Ringgenberg’s holster and mace holder. Clarks DNA was
also found on the “front left” handcuff holder and “back left” handcuff holder on Ringgenberg’s
duty belt. Again, DNA testing was conducted on the grip of Ringgenberg’s gun and Clark’s
DNA was found there as well.
The presence of Clark’s DNA on Ringgenberg’s duty belt and grip of Ringgenberg’s gun is
strong forensic corroboration of the officer’s statements that Clark’s hand was on the grip of
8

 Ringgenberg’s gun. Clark simply could not have been handcuffed and attempting to seize
Ringgenberg’s gun while they were on the ground.
LEGAL ANALYSIS
The evidence detailed above does not support the filing of criminal charges against Officers
Dustin Schwarze or Mark Ringgenberg for the fatal shooting of Jamar Clark. At the time he was
shot, Clark was attempting to gain control of Ringgenberg’s firearm. Ringgenberg reasonably
believed that if Clark had succeeded in removing his firearm from his holster, Clark would have
shot both officers as well as exposing third parties to danger of injury by firearm. Ringgenberg
and Clark were wrestling on the ground in a position which rendered Ringgenberg unable to
remove Clark’s hand from his firearm. Ringgenberg communicated to Schwarze that Clark had
his firearm and that Schwarze should shoot Clark. Schwarze did so. His action was reasonable
given both his own observations and Ringgenberg’s plea to shoot Clark.
Eyewitness testimony was contradictory on a central issue in this case: whether Clark was
handcuffed at the time he was shot. Those who have stated that Clark was handcuffed are
themselves contradictory, some saying one wrist, others two. Some suggesting he was
handcuffed in the front of his body and some in the back casting doubt upon the statements
without reference to physical evidence. Forensic evidence and video evidence both support the
belief that Clark was not handcuffed at any time throughout the altercation.
THE USE OF DEADLY FORCE AGAINST CLARK WAS AUTHORIZED
When police first encountered Clark on November 15th they knew that: 1) he was the alleged
assailant in a domestic assault which resulted in a need for medical attention for that victim, 2)
he had interfered with EMS personnel to the degree that they requested police intervention, 3) as
they approached him his hands were in his jacket pockets and he refused directives to remove
them from his pockets and, 4) when they attempted to handcuff him he actively resisted,
compelling the use of force to achieve their goal of handcuffing him.
When Clark was forcibly taken to the ground by Ringgenberg, Clark continued to resist by
struggling with Ringgenberg. Because they had fallen with Clark on his back and Ringgenberg’s
back to Clark’s front, Clark was able to reach the grip of Ringgenberg’s firearm on which
Ringgenberg could feel Clark pulling. Ringgenberg was aware Clark had his hand on the grip of
the weapon as he (Ringgenberg) was able to reach behind and feel Clark’s hand on the grip. He
was unable to remove Clark’s hand from the grip.
Recognizing that Clark had control of his weapon, Ringgenberg told Schwarze multiple times
that Clark had his gun. Finally, Ringgenberg told Schwarze more than once to shoot Clark.
Schwarze stated that Ringgenberg’s voice had a tone that was “the most sincere, panicked voice
I’d ever heard.” Schwarze told Clark he was going to shoot him if he didn’t let go; Clark
responded, “I’m ready to die.” Schwarze’s first attempt failed but on the second trigger pull the
weapon discharged, striking and fatally wounding Clark.
1. The law applied to the facts.
The use of deadly force is justified if the officer reasonably believes that death or great bodily
harm to himself or another will likely result if he does not act. In this case Ringgenberg
subjectively believed that Clark had or was in the process of obtaining control of his weapon and
that were Clark able to remove the weapon from its holster, both Ringgenberg and Schwarze
would likely be shot.
9

 Ringgenberg’s subjective belief is also objectively reasonable. First, Clark’s DNA was found on
Ringgenberg’s holster, mace container, and his gun. Next, the keepers designed to keep
Ringgenberg’s utility belt in place had become unsnapped. Moreover, when Ringgenberg is free
of Clark the video shows that his belt is turned such that his gun is behind his back. As he stands
Ringgenberg can be seen adjusting his duty belt to return it to its normal position.
These facts corroborate Ringgenberg’s belief that Clark was forcefully pulling on his belt and
holding his gun and it was objectively reasonable to believe he was attempting to remove it.
Minn. Stat. § 609.504 provides that disarming or attempting to disarm a peace officer is a felony.
An attempt to obtain control of the firearm of a peace officer presents a grave danger to the
officer and bystanders. The attempt alone suggests a willingness to use the firearm if
successfully removed from the holster. Once removed, an assailant can instantaneously begin
firing the weapon. There is no time for recovery. Even if the person is not ultimately successful,
an attempt to gain control of an officer’s firearm creates a significant risk of injury.
Ringgenberg and Schwarze were interviewed separately. Both stated that they believed that
without the use of deadly force, Clark would have obtained possession of Ringgenberg’s firearm.
Each stated their independent fear that they would be shot.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office has concluded that criminal charges are not
warranted against either Officer Mark Ringgenberg or Officer Dustin Schwarze.

VIDEO
I will now play videos from that evening. The complete videos will be on the Hennepin County
Attorney’s Office’s website later today. Right now you will see key portions of a civilian’s
video and videos taken from the back of both the ambulance that treated RayAnn Hayes and the
second ambulance that treated Jamar Clark. These ambulance videos have been shortened to
relevant sections.
There are other police videos and civilian videos that do not show anything about the shooting
incident. Again, these complete videos will be on the website. The cameras on the Elks Lodge,
a social club, did not record anything.
This first video was taken by: Danny Braylock

10

 609.066 AUTHORIZED USE OF DEADLY FORCE BY PEACE OFFICERS.
Subdivision 1. Deadly force defined.
For the purposes of this section, "deadly force" means force which the actor uses with the
purpose of causing, or which the actor should reasonably know creates a substantial risk of
causing, death or great bodily harm. The intentional discharge of a firearm, other than a firearm
loaded with less lethal munitions and used by a peace officer within the scope of official duties,
in the direction of another person, or at a vehicle in which another person is believed to be,
constitutes deadly force. "Less lethal munitions" means projectiles which are designed to stun,
temporarily incapacitate, or cause temporary discomfort to a person. "Peace officer" has the
meaning given in section 626.84, subdivision 1.
Subd. 2. Use of deadly force.
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 609.06 or 609.065, the use of deadly force by a
peace officer in the line of duty is justified only when necessary:
(1) to protect the peace officer or another from apparent death or great bodily harm;

11