From: wierjt??

To: mum Migha 
Subject: Re: Pilot Knob
Date: Friday, January 29, 2016 1:13:59 AM

 

Let's agree on our messaging. The issue is not whether it's a good deal. It's
whether the council members did not have enough information to make a
decision they can?t undo. Please focus on the question I keep asking.

Please stop defending the decision as being justified, until we get the first question
answered.


Sent from my phone.

On Jan 28, 2016, at 10:28 PM, Cortez, John Michael <John?
wrote:

Not yet, unfortunately. However, tomorrow morning, want to make the case that even
ifthe answer is yes, staff has that flexibility, that should not be our response. We need
to double down on this being a good deal that shouldn't be an issue

Sent from my Windows Phone

From: whim

Sent: 1/28/2016 10:21 PM
To: igm?i'm Mirhm??r!
Subject: Re: Pilot Knob

What is answer to the big question?
Did you hear?

5

Sent from my phone.

On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:47 PM, Cortez, John Michael <1th-
wrote:

Ray understand that the Water and Wastewater Commission has
requested a briefing on the Pilot Knob Smart Housing deal at their next
meeting. i would hope that in addition to the water utility being able to
present their perspective on the matter, our staff from Neighborhood
Housing would also be able to present the mechanics of the deal and the
SMART housing program. I think it might be for staff from
those respective departments to meet before hand to coordinate their

presentations, so that the Commission can receive a balanced perspective
on this complex policy issue. I recognize that this existing policy
potentially places the interests of multiple departments/policy areas in
conflict. I believe having the context from all the policy areas at play
would be beneficial to the Commissioners understanding and any
potential recommendations for council they develop. Please let me know
if we can make that happen. -