Animal Waste Management Plan for Fairview Acres Dairy Farm c/o Richard Obrist 7615 Trask River Road Tillamook, OR 97141 (503) 801-3231 Prepared by: Tom Thomson Northwest Ag Consulting Dallas, OR (503) 510-3883 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Fairview Acres Dairy Farm 2014 2014 Animal Waste Management Plan Animal Waste Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 – GENERAL INFORMATION  Signature Page ............................................................................................. 1-1  Background and Site Information .................................................................. 1-2  Manure Storage and Nutrient Balance Summary .......................................... 1-7  Emergency Response Plan ........................................................................... 1-8  Farm Location Map ....................................................................................... 1-9  Farm Topography Map ................................................................................ 1-10 SECTION 2 – PRODUCTION AREA  Number of Animals ........................................................................................ 2-1  Animal Mortality Management ....................................................................... 2-1  Collection of Manure, Process Water and Runoff ......................................... 2-1  Treatment Facilities ....................................................................................... 2-1  Storage Facilities ........................................................................................... 2-2  Transfer of Manure, Process Water and Runoff ............................................ 2-2  Operation and Maintenance Considerations ................................................. 2-3  Production Area Map(s) ................................................................................ 2-9 SECTION 3 – UTILIZATION AREA  Cropping System ........................................................................................... 3-1  Field Map(s) .................................................................................................. 3-3  Application ..................................................................................................... 3-5  General Considerations for Making Manure Applications.............................. 3-5  Setback Requirements .................................................................................. 3-6  Considerations for Dry Season Manure Applications .................................... 3-6  Setback Map(s) ............................................................................................. 3-9  Considerations for Wet Season Manure Applications ................................. 3-11  Manure and Soil Sampling Frequency ........................................................ 3-12  How to Sample Liquid Manure .................................................................... 3-12  How to Sample Solid Manure ...................................................................... 3-12  Manure Tests .............................................................................................. 3-15  How to Sample Soils ................................................................................... 3-17  Soil Tests .................................................................................................... 3-19  How to Calibrate Application Equipment ..................................................... 3-21  Amount of Manure to Apply for Crops Grown .............................................. 3-25  Irrigation Water Management ...................................................................... 3-35 SECTION 4 – SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT  Soil Map(s) .................................................................................................... 4-1  Soil Reports................................................................................................... 4-3  Predicted Soil Erosion ................................................................................. 4-33  Phosphorus Index ....................................................................................... 4-43 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page i of ii TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 5 – REFERENCES  Request for Oregon CAFO Permit Modification ............................................ 5-1  Notice of Registration and Oregon CAFO General Permit Summary ............ 5-3  Oregon Confined Animal Feeding Operation General Permit Number 1 ..... 5-11  Publications and Software ........................................................................... 5-27  ORAWM Workbook ..................................................................................... 5-29 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page ii of ii Section 1 GENERAL INFORMATION Farm contact information: Fairview Acres Dairy Farm c/o Richard Obrist 7615 Trask River Road Tillamook, OR 97141 (503) 801-3231 Physical Location: Fairview Acres Dairy Farm- 7615 Trask River Road Bohren Farm- 440 Wilson River Loop Road Little Dairy Farm- 1375 Olsen Road Chad Acres Farm- 7765 Fairview Road Tillamook, OR 97141 Animal Feeding Operation: Current- Small/Medium Confined & Large Concentrated CAFO Planned- Large Concentrated CAFO Type & Size: Dairy: 1,924 animals Latitude/Longitude: Fairview Acres Dairy Farm- N45.450220, W123.792740 Bohren Farm- N45.46880, W123.81140 Little Dairy Farm- N45.46690, W123.79000 Chad Acres Farm- N45.456920, W123.785130 AWMP Plan Approval I certify that I have reviewed this AWMP for technical adequacy and that the elements of the documents are technically compatible, reasonable and can be implemented. Signature: ____________________________ Name: Tom Thomson Title: Individual TSP Date: _____________ Number: TSP-03-1132 Owner/Operator As the owner/operator and decision maker for the Fairview Acres Dairy Farm, I understand that I am responsible for this AWMP being implemented in a timely manner and keeping all the necessary records for the operation and management of the animal waste management system. Signature: ____________________________ Date: _____________ Name: Richard Obrist for Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 1-1 Section 1 GENERAL INFORMA TION Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 1?2 Section 1 GENERAL INFORMATION BACKGROUND AND SITE INFORMATION Fairview Acres Dairy Farm is located about three miles southeast of Tillamook, OR at 7615 Trask River Road. The dairy is currently permitted for a total of 1,924 animals at 4 facilities with an owned land base of 564 acres, leased land base of 254.5 acres and export land base of 285 acres for a total of 1,103.5 acres. The following table gives a breakdown of acres and animal numbers currently permitted at each facility: Total Facility Acres Milkers Dry Cows Heifers Calves Animals Fairview Acres Dairy Farm 145.8 700 100 50 50 900 Bohren Farm 108.3 225 25 15 10 275 Little Dairy Farm 67.1 165 0 65 66 296 Chad Acres Farm 165.8 0 23 215 215 453 Other Owned Acres 77.0 0 0 0 0 0 Leased Acres 254.5 0 0 0 0 0 Export Acres 285.0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals1103.5 1,090 148 345 341 1,924 The purpose of this plan revision is for consolidating the existing four permits for Fairview Acres Dairy Farm into one permit and one management plan. A request for consolidation is located at the beginning of Section 5. The dairy is not requesting an increase in animal numbers at this time. As noted above, the operation consists of four facilities which will be used, in conjunction with one another to best manage the cows housing needs at various growth stages and the fields at those facilities for maximizing forage composition and yield. The Coastal climate allows for a base forage production level of approximately 6 tons/acre of DM per year based on minimal management. With an intensive level of management, the fields may produce as much as 8-10 ton/acre DM annually. However, this is only an estimate and depends upon intensive management coupled with favorable weather conditions. Fairview Acres Dairy FarmFairview Acres Dairy Farm is the main dairy which is owned and operated by the Obrist family. The milk cows, dry cows and younger heifers are grazed throughout the year based on weather conditions, livestock health, economic conditions, and forage production during the year. Manure, bedding and wasted feed collected on the alleyways of the livestock barns for Fairview Acres Dairy Farm are scraped to an underground liquid collection tank shown on the Production Area Map for the dairy on page 2-9. Some of the manure, bedding and wasted feed collected in the livestock barns is collected and directly transferred to the solids storage areas. All livestock barns are guttered, down-spouted and outletted in an area free of manure. Wastewater from the holding pen and milking facility is transferred to the underground liquid collection tank by gravity flow through underground pipelines. Any rainfall runoff from paved areas containing manure and the solids storage area drain to the underground collection tank. Wastewater stored in the Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 1-3 Section 1 GENERAL INFORMATION underground collection tank it is pumped through a pipeline to the large storage tank. The solids containing manure, bedding and wasted feed removed from the livestock barns are stored in a roofed solids storage barn shown on the Production Area Map for the dairy on page 2-9. Liquid manure is picked up and returned from the Port of Tillamook Digestor (POTD) on a daily basis. Solids stored in the solids storage barn and wastewater stored in the large storage tank are applied to the hay and pasture land fields during the spring and summer months to utilize the nutrients and organics for forage production. Wastewater is applied using a liquid tank wagon and traveling big gun sprinkler system and the solids are applied using a tractor pulled solids spreader. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm owns 158 contiguous acres for the dairy farm facilities described above and the hay and pasture land fields used to produce forage for the dairy livestock. These acres consist of 12 acres for the dairy farm facilities, shops and houses and 146 acres of irrigated hay and pasture land used to produce forage for the dairy livestock. Fresh water irrigation is available from a well. The crop rotation for the Fairview Acres Dairy Farm consists of perennial grass pastures that are harvested by grazing livestock and for hay. Bohren FarmThe Bohren farm is located at 440 Wilson Loop Rd. near Tillamook Oregon and is owned by Fairview Acres Dairy Farms, Inc. The dairy livestock are grazed throughout the year based on weather conditions, livestock health, economic conditions, and forage production during the year. Manure, bedding and wasted feed are collected using a dry scraping method where solids are scraped to the solid storage area. Leachate from this solid storage area flows into the nearby underground collection tank. Solids are stored in one of three solid storage barns shown on the Production Area Map for the dairy on page 2-9. The third storage unit is used only when necessary as it doubles as a forage and bedding storage area. All livestock barns are guttered, down-spouted and outletted in an area free of manure. Wastewater from the holding pen and milking facility is transferred to the underground liquid collection tank by gravity flow through underground pipelines. Any rainfall runoff from paved areas containing manure and the solids storage area drain to the underground collection tank. Wastewater stored in the underground collection tank is pumped through a pipeline to one of four wastewater storage tanks shown on the Production Area Map for the dairy on page 2-9. Wastewater is stored in the four wastewater storage tanks until it can be applied to the hay and pasture fields. Solids stored in the solids storage barns and wastewater stored in the wastewater storage tank are applied to the hay and pasture land fields during the spring and summer months to utilize the nutrients and organics. Wastewater is applied either via tank wagon or big gun traveler. Solids are applied using a tractor drawn solid manure spreader. Bohren Farm has 120 contiguous acres for the dairy farm facilities described above and the hay and pasture land fields used to produce forage for the dairy livestock. These acres consist of 5 acres for the dairy farm facilities, shops and houses and 115 acres of irrigated hay and pasture land used to produce forage for the dairy livestock. Fresh water for irrigation is supplied by the slough which the dairy has water rights to. The Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 1-4 Section 1 GENERAL INFORMATION crop rotation for the Bohren Farm consists of perennial grass pastures that are harvested by grazing livestock and for hay. Little Dairy FarmThe Little Dairy Farm is owned by Fairview Acres Dairy Farms, Inc. and is located at 1375 Olson Road N. near Tillamook Oregon. The dairy livestock are grazed throughout the year based on weather conditions, livestock health, economic conditions, and forage production during the year. After weaning heifer calves are moved off the farm to be raised. They are either sold out right from the off farm facility or brought back as springing heifers later. Dry cows are moved off farm and housed at another facility. Manure, bedding and wasted feed are collected using a dry scraping method where solids are scraped to the solid storage area. Leachate from this solid storage area flows into the nearby underground collection tank. Solids are stored in two solid storage barns shown on the Production Area Map for the dairy on page 2-9. All livestock barns are guttered, down-spouted and outletted in an area free of manure. Wastewater from the holding pen and milking facility is scraped to the underground liquid collection tank. Any rainfall runoff from paved areas containing manure and the solids storage area drain to the underground collection tank. Wastewater stored in the underground collection tank it is pumped through a pipeline to one of two wastewater storage tanks shown on the Production Area Map for the dairy on page 2-9. Wastewater is stored in the two wastewater storage tanks until it can be applied to the hay and pasture fields. Liquid manure is picked up and returned from the Port of Tillamook Digestor (POTD) on a daily basis. Solids stored in the solids storage barn and wastewater stored in the wastewater storage tank are applied to the hay and pasture land fields during the spring and summer months to utilize the nutrients and organics. Wastewater is applied either via tank wagon or big gun traveler. Solids are applied using a solid manure spreader. The Little Dairy Farm has 77 contiguous acres for the dairy farm facilities described above and the hay and pasture land fields used to produce forage for the dairy livestock. These acres consist of 4.6 acres for the dairy farm facilities, shops and houses and 71.1 acres of irrigated hay and pasture land used to produce forage for the dairy livestock. The remaining 1.3 acres are considered wildlife acres and do not receive applications of wastewater or solids containing manure. The crop rotation for the Little Dairy Farm consists of continuous perennial grass pastures that are harvested by grazing livestock and for hay. Chad Acres FarmThe Chad Acres Farm is owned by Fairview Acres Dairy Farms, Inc. and is located at 7765 Fairview Road near Tillamook Oregon. This farm is used to house and care for the heifers and calves as replacement livestock for the other dairy farms owned by Fairview Acres Dairy Farms, Inc. The dairy livestock are grazed throughout the year based on weather conditions, livestock health, economic conditions, and forage production during the year. Manure, bedding and wasted feed are collected using a dry scraping method where solids are scraped to the solid storage area. Leachate from this solid storage area flows Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 1-5 Section 1 GENERAL INFORMATION into the nearby underground collection tank. Solids are stored in two solid storage barns shown on the Production Area Map for the dairy on page 2-9. All livestock barns are guttered, down-spouted and outletted in an area free of manure. Any rainfall runoff from paved areas containing manure and the solids storage area drain to the underground collection tanks. Wastewater stored in the underground collection tank it is pumped through a pipeline to a wastewater storage tank shown on the Production Area Map for the farm on page 2-9. Wastewater is stored in the wastewater storage tank until it is applied to the hay and pasture fields. Solids stored in the solids storage barn and wastewater stored in the wastewater storage tank are applied to the hay and pasture land fields during the spring and summer months to utilize the nutrients and organics. Wastewater is applied either via a tank wagon or big gun traveler. Solids are applied using a tractor drawn solid manure spreader. Chad Acres Farm has 140 contiguous acres for the dairy farm facilities described above and the hay and pasture land fields used to produce forage for the dairy livestock. These acres consist of 5.4 acres for the dairy farm facilities, shops and houses and 134.6 acres of irrigated hay and pasture land used to produce forage for the dairy livestock. Fresh water is provided by a well. The crop rotation for the Chad Acres Farm consists of perennial grass pastures that are harvested by grazing livestock and for hay. Other Facilities The other owned and leased acres of hay and pasture land fields are used to produce forage for the dairy livestock. The other owned, leased and export fields may receive periodic applications of wastewater and solids containing manure generated by Fairview Acres Dairy Farms, Inc. The crop rotation for the other owned, leased and export fields consist of perennial grass pastures that are harvested for hay. Irrigation Water Management Liquid manure applications provide some of the net irrigation requirement with freshwater irrigations providing the remainder. The traveling big guns are for both liquid manure and freshwater applications. Often the dairy will use freshwater after a manure application to rinse residue from the leaves and drive some of the nutrients into the soil. Animal Mortality Management Animal mortalities are disposed of by an animal removal service that is available to members of Tillamook County Creamery Association. Nutrient Management The soil concentration of phosphorus ranges from low to high in the Fairview Acres Dairy Farm hay and pasture land fields. Applications of wastewater and solids containing manure are planned on a nitrogen basis on all fields and the soil phosphorus concentrations will be monitored using soil tests. It is estimated that the dairy does not produce enough manure to meet the nutrient demand for the hay and pasture land fields. Supplemental nutrient applications to the crop, hay and pasture land fields should be based on soil tests and fertilizer guides to prevent excess soil nutrient concentrations. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 1-6 Section 1 GENERAL INFORMATION MANURE STORAGE AND NUTRIENT BALANCE SUMMARY Manure StorageStorage Type: Capacity Estimated Storage Period Wastewater Storage Tanks- 284,553 CF 88 Days Solids Storage Barns- 124,530 CF 108 Days Nutrient BalanceNutrients Generated: N Generated (lbs) after Losses P2O5 Generated (lbs) after Losses Solid Manure- 57,377 lbs 66,602 lbs Liquid Manure- 44,488 lbs 26,930 lbs Pasture Manure- 74,155 lbs 41,709 lbs Total- 176,020 lbs 135,242 lbs N Exported (lbs) after Losses Exported Nutrients: P2O5 Exported (lbs) after Losses Solid Manure- 14,819 lbs 3,631 lbs Liquid Manure- 11,490 lbs 4,683 lbs Total- 26,309 lbs 8,314 lbs Crop Nutrient Removal: N Utilized (lbs) Total- 384,018 lbs Nutrients Generated after Losses(lbs.) Net Nutrients: P2O5 Utilized (lbs) 121,350 lbs Nutrients Removed by Crop and Exported after Losses (lbs) Net Nutrient Balance after Losses (lbs) Nitrogen (N)- 176,020 lbs 410,327 lbs -234,307 lbs Phosphate (P 2O5)- 135,242 lbs 129,664 lbs 5,578 lbs System Losses: Nutrients Generated (lbs) Nutrients Remaining after Losses (lbs) Nutrients Lost in System (lbs) Nitrogen (N)- 343,012 lbs 176,020 lbs 166,992 lbs Phosphate (P 2O5)- 147,394 lbs 135,242 lbs 12,153 lbs Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 1-7 Section 1 GENERAL INFORMATION EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN In Case of an Emergency Storage Facility Spill, Leak or Failure Implement the following first containment steps: a. Stop all other activities to address the spill. b. Stop the flow. For example, use skid loader or tractor with blade to contain or divert spill or leak. c. Call for help and excavator if needed. d. Complete the clean-up and repair the necessary components. e. Assess the extent of the emergency and request additional help if needed. In Case of an Emergency Spill, Leak or Failure during Transport or Land Application Implement the following first containment steps: a. Stop all other activities to address the spill and stop the flow. b. Call for help if needed. c. If the spill posed a hazard to local traffic, call for local traffic control assistance and clear the road and roadside of spilled material. d. Contain the spill or runoff from entering surface waters using straw bales, saw dust, soil or other appropriate materials. e. If flow is coming from a tile, plug the tile with a tile plug immediately. f. Assess the extent of the emergency and request additional help if needed. Contacts to be made by the owner or operator within 24 hours Organization Oregon Dept. of Agriculture Natural Resources Division 635 Capitol St., N.E. Salem, OR 97301-2532 Oregon Emergency Response (System OERS) County Environmental Health Department County Roads Department Phone Number (503) 986-4700 TTD (503) 986-4762 (800) 452-0311 (503) 842-3943 Be prepared to provide the following information: a. Your name and contact information. b. Farm location (driving directions) and other pertinent information. c. Description of emergency. d. Estimate of the amounts, area covered, and distance traveled. e. Whether manure has reached surface waters or major field drains. f. Whether there is any obvious damage: employee injury, fish kill, or property damage. g. Current status of containment efforts. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 1-8 Section 1 GENERAL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP FOR FAIRVIEW ACRES DAIRY FARM Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 1-9 Section 1 GENERAL INFORMATION TOPOGRAPHY MAP FOR FAIRVIEW ACRES DAIRY FARM Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 1-10 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA ANIMAL NUMBERS Fairview Acres Dairy Farm is currently permitted for 1,924 animals which is the maximum number of animals planned for this dairy consisting of 1238 milking and dry cows and 686 heifers and calves. This plan was written based on 1,924 animals and land base described herein. ANIMAL MORTALITY MANAGEMENT Currently animal mortalities for the Fairview Acres Dairy Farm are being disposed of by a service provided by the Tillamook Creamery Association. Other methods of dealing with mortalities may be employed by Fairview Acres Dairy Farm as needed. Having dead animals sent to an acceptable disposal site is the best method to deal with animal mortalities. A list of landfills and phone numbers can be found on the internet at http://www.deq.state.or.us/lq/sw/disposal/permittedfacilities.html. If a local landfill is not permitted to accept animal carcasses, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) may grant an exception. Phone numbers to local DEQ offices can be found in most phone books or on the internet at http://www.deq.state.or.us/about/locations.html. Under no circumstances are animal mortalities to be disposed of in any type of liquid manure storage facility. COLLECTION OF MANURE, PROCESS WATER AND RUNOFF Manure, bedding and wasted feed is collected in the barns. The estimated volume of Manure bedding and wasted feed that will be collected annually was generated using the ORAWM workbook located in Section 5. Leachate and rainfall runoff from the silage and solids storage areas is directed to catch basins that drain to wastewater collection facilities via underground pipelines. The estimated volumes of leachate and rainfall runoff from the silage and solid storage areas that will be collected annually were generated using the ORAWM workbook located in Section 5. Rainfall runoff from paved and unpaved areas that comes into contact with animal manure is directed to catch basins that drain to the wastewater collection facilities. The estimated volume of rainfall runoff that will be collected annually was generated using the ORAWM workbook located in in Section 5. All rainfall runoff from roofs is collected using gutters and downspouts and directed to drainage ditches using underground pipelines. All process water generated from the Fairview Acres Dairy Farm facilities is directed to catch basins that drain to wastewater collection facilities. The estimated volume of process water that will be collected annually was generated using the ORAWM workbook located in Section 5. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 2-1 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA TREATMENT FACILITIES A dry scrape system is used to separate solids from liquids containing manure, wasted feed and bedding. Some of the separated solids are composted and recycled for bedding. STORAGE FACILITIES Collection and storage facilities for wastewater and solids containing manure, wasted feed and bedding are shown on the Production Area Maps on page 2-9. Capacities and estimate volumes to store for the storage facilities can be found on the storage worksheet in the ORAWM workbook located in Section 5. TRANSFER OF MANURE, PROCESS WATER AND RUNOFF Wastewater, manure, bedding and wasted feed from the livestock barns is directed to the wastewater and solids collection facilities. Wastewater and solids from the collection facilities are directed to the wastewater and solids storage facilities shown on the Production Area Maps on page 2-9. Wastewater stored in the wastewater storage facilities is pumped through pipelines or transported by tank wagon to the hay and pasture land fields to be utilized as a source of nutrients. Traveling big gun irrigation systems and tractor pulled tank wagons are used to apply the wastewater to the hay and pasture land fields. Solids stored in the solids storage facilities are hauled to the hay and pasture land fields and applied using a tractor pulled solids spreader to be utilized as a source of nutrients. Excess manure from any one farm may be hauled to another farm which has available storage and/or stockpiled at that location for later application. Manure returning from the Port of Tillamook Digester may be directed to any available storage on any of the farms as needed. This allows balancing of manure storage during periods of inclement weather or other periods when land application is not immediately feasible. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 2-2 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND STORAGE TANKSThe wastewater collection and storage tanks shown on the Production Area Map on page 2-9 are used to store wastewater containing manure generated by the Fairview Acres Dairy Farm. The storage capacity and estimated storage period for the wastewater collection and storage tanks are shown on the ORAWM workbook storage worksheet located in Section 5. Emptying of the wastewater collection and storage tanks should begin in the spring and continue through the spring and summer months as weather conditions permit applying wastewater in accordance with the guidance given in Section 3, Utilization Area. To function properly and have the greatest management flexibility, the wastewater collection and storage tanks must be as empty as possible in the fall before the fall and winter rainy season begins. Any annual buildup of solids in the wastewater collection and storage tanks must be removed to maintain design capacity and applied to land application areas in accordance with guidance given in Section 3, Utilization Area. Inspect all tanks weekly to insure structural integrity. If the structural integrity of a tank is compromised, immediately empty the tank to determine the cause and make necessary repairs before putting the tank back into service. Do not allow equipment that exceeds the design limit of the tanks on or within 20 feet of the structure. Inspect all uncovered tanks on a biweekly basis to insure at least 1 foot of freeboard is being maintained to accommodate excess rainfall such as a 25 year-24hour storm and prevent overtopping of the tank. Keep pumps, agitators, piping, valves and all other electrical and mechanical equipment in good condition by following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Maintain grounding rods and wiring for all electrical equipment in good condition. Immediately remove all foreign debris within the structure that may cause damage to pumps or agitators. Pump the wastewater collection and storage tanks s completely empty during the summer months and cleanout any debris and other solid materials that may have accumulated in the tanks. Inspect the tanks for structural damage and if structural damage to a tank is discovered seek the services of a qualified engineer to assess the damage and recommend necessary repairs before putting the tank back into service. Follow the guidance given in Section 3, Utilization Area, when applying wastewater to fields. Do not dispose of animal carcasses in any wastewater collection and storage tanks . It is against the law to do so. Maintain all fences, railings, and/or warning signs to provide warning and/or prevent unauthorized human or livestock entry. Immediately repair vandalism, vehicular or livestock damage to the structure, earthen areas surrounding the structure, or any appurtenances. Maintain lids, grates and shields on openings. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 2-3 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA Provide proper ventilation before entering the tank, for any reason what so ever. Provide and use self - contained breathing apparatus (scuba) equipment when entering a tank. No persons should enter the tank unless safety ropes are used and someone else capable of providing rescue assistance is outside the tank. Do not assume any tank, including open top tanks, are well ventilated. SOLIDS STORAGE FACILITIESThe solids storage facilities shown on the Production Area Map on page 2-9 are used to store solids containing manure generated by the Fairview Acres Dairy Farm. The storage capacity and estimated storage period for the solids storage facilities are shown on the ORAWM workbook storage worksheet located in Section 5. Emptying of the solids storage facilities should begin in the spring and continue through the spring and summer months as weather conditions permit applying solids in accordance with the guidance given in Section 3, Utilization Area. To function properly and have the greatest management flexibility, the solids storage facilities must be as empty as possible in the fall before the fall and winter rainy season begins. Periodically inspect concrete and asphalt slabs, walls and curbs and repair or replace broken sections as needed. Cleanup any spillage of manure and organics from outside of the solids storage area and place them back in the solids storage facilities. Maintain all fences, railings, and/or warning signs to provide warning and/or prevent unauthorized human or livestock entry. Immediately repair vandalism, vehicular or livestock damage to the structure, earthen areas surrounding the structure, or any appurtenances. BUILDING ROOFSInspect building roofs annually as a minimum. Repair and/or replace all rusted sections and secure loose sections as needed. Immediately replace all broken trusses, rafters, beams, poles as needed. Immediately determining the cause and necessary modification(s) to prevent reoccurring structural failure is essential. FENCESDo not allow livestock access to open water courses and drainageways. Provide off stream watering facilities where possible and limit access to designated watering areas. Inspect fences periodically and repair or replace broken or decayed posts and tighten sagging wire as needed. Broken wire can be spliced or replaced. Replace broken or missing insulators on electric fences as needed and repair or replace inoperative electric fence controllers. Insure gates and other appurtenances are in good working order. Replace or repair components as needed. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 2-4 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA IRRIGATION SYSTEMSMaintain sprinkler irrigation systems in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations to help ensure trouble free operation. Prevent livestock access to equipment during operation. Clean plugged nozzles and replace if worn or defective. Promptly repair all leaks by replacing valves, fittings, gaskets, worn or damaged parts. Prompt repair or replacement of damaged or worn components is necessary. Check to make sure all application components i.e. water control structures, gates, valves, ditches, etc. are functional and are in good operating condition. Maintain screening and filtering facilities. Maintain vigorous vegetative growth where applicable. LIVESTOCK WATERING FACILITIESCheck all above ground connections, valves, gates, rodent guards, inlets and outlets to make sure they are functioning properly. Check troughs and tanks for leaks or cracks and repair or replace immediately, if necessary. Make certain the area adjacent to the trough is well protected with gravel, paving, or good cover. Be sure that the outlet pipe has a free outlet and is not causing any serious erosion problems. Check periodically to see if debris has fallen into the trough or tank which may restrict inflow or planned functions of the outflow system. Clean the entire system periodically and remove moss, algae growth, and/or sludge. Chemicals such as copper sulfate and chlorine can be used to prevent moss and algae growth. Local rules and regulations are to be followed when using chemicals to make sure they are safe for animals. Where necessary maintain coverings and insulation to prevent damage by freezing. Eradicate or otherwise remove all rodents or burrowing animals. Immediately repair any damage caused by their activity. Immediately repair any vandalism, vehicular or livestock damage. PIPELINESFlush pipelines used for liquid waste applications with clean water following waste application, or as needed, to prevent particle buildup. Drain the pipeline and components in areas that are subject to freezing. If parts of the pipeline cannot be drained, a non-toxic antifreeze solution may be added. Check to make sure all valves and air vents are set at the proper operating condition so they can provide protection to the pipeline. Inspect pipelines for signs of failure. Inspect risers and valves periodically for leaks or worn gaskets. Repair or replace pipeline, risers and valves as needed. Eradicate or otherwise remove all rodents or burrowing animals. Immediately repair any damage caused by their activity. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 2-5 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA PUMPSOperate and maintain pumps in accordance with good judgment and manufacture’s manuals and recommendations. Drain liquid manure from pumps during cold weather to prevent freezing. If parts of the system cannot be drained, a non-toxic antifreeze solution may be added. Inspect pumps periodically and remove debris wrapped around shafts and impellers. Maintain foot valves and check valves for proper operation. For proper operation of electric motors and controls, maintain lubrication for all bearings, keep electric panel free from obstructions and debris. Maintain electrical safety devices, assure all electrical contacts are tight, and lock main electrical switch to “OFF” position during non-use season. Maintain adequate shade and ventilation for pump motors. For proper operation of pumps, maintain lubrication for all bearings and pump shafts, assure belts are adjusted properly, maintain safety covering devices on open shafts and belt drives, check to make sure all safety valves and devices are set at proper operating conditions so they may provide protection to the pump and power unit. For centrifugal pumps, periodically measure tolerance between pump impeller and pump casing (i.e. wearing) and replace wear ring as needed to help restore new pump operating characteristics. Use portable pressure gauge (preferably a liquid filled gauge) to monitor pump performance. Operate and maintain agitators in accordance with the manufacture’s manual and recommendations. Inspect all plumbing annually as a minimum. Replace, tighten, or repair broken or loose connections and lines as needed. WELL(S)Protect the area immediately surrounding the well from being damaged by agriculture machinery, vehicles, or livestock. All fences, railings, and/or warning signs shall be maintained to provide warning and/or prevent unauthorized human or livestock entry. Do not allow any foreign debris to accumulate and maintain soil and vegetative covering in the immediate vicinity of the well. Eradicate or otherwise remove all rodents or burrowing animals. Immediately repair any damage caused by their activity. Check metal surfaces for rust and other damage especially sections in contact with earthfill and with other materials. Repair or replace damaged section and apply paint as a protective covering. Keep all surface water from entering or accumulating at the immediate vicinity of the well site. Immediately repair any vandalism, vehicular, or livestock damage. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 2-6 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA CHEMICAL HANDLING CHECKLISTThe following measures shall be taken to prevent chemicals from contaminating process water or storm water storage and treatment systems: 1. Make sure all chemicals are stored in proper containers. Expired chemicals and empty containers are to be properly disposed of in accordance with state and federal regulations. Pesticides and associate refuse are to be disposed of in accordance with the FIFRA label. 2. Chemical storage areas are to be self-contained with no drains or other pathways that will allow spilled chemicals to exit the storage area. 3. Chemical storage areas are to be covered to prevent chemical contact with rain or snow. 4. Emergency procedures and equipment are to be in place to contain and clean up chemical spills. 5. Chemical handling and equipment wash areas are to be designed and constructed to prevent contamination of surface waters, waste water, and storm water storage and treatment systems. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 2-7 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 2?8 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA PRODUCTION AREA MAP FOR FAIRVIEW ACRES DAIRY FARM Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 2-9 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA PRODUCTION AREA MAP FOR BOHERN FARM Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 2-10 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA PRODUCTION AREA MAP FOR LITTLE DAIRY FARM Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 2-11 Section 2 PRODUCTION AREA PRODUCTION AREA MAP FOR CHAD ACRES FARM Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 2-12 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA CROPPING SYSTEM The acres of crop land area available for utilization of the nutrients and organics contained in the wastewater and solids produced from the Fairview Acres Dairy Farm is shown on the utilization worksheet in ORAWM located in Section 5. Yield data and nutrient utilization rates for the crops grown are also shown on the inventory worksheet in ORAWM located in Section 5. Irrigated and nonirrigated crop yield data from the Tillamook County Soil Survey referenced in Section 5 indicates the yield data used in developing this plan is within the range of the given crop yields for well managed fields. Traveling big gun irrigation systems are used to irrigate and apply wastewater containing manure and other organics produced from the Fairview Acres Dairy Farm to the crop land fields. These systems use single large sprinkler nozzles usually mounted on a cart with wheels that is attached to a high density polyethylene pipeline that is rolled up on a large reel that provides a constant travel speed for the sprinkler. These systems apply water depending on the nozzle size, operating pressure and travel used and have an efficiency of 65 to 75 percent. Traveling big gun sprinkler systems must be well managed to prevent excess percolation, surface runoff, wind drift and evaporation losses. Other types of irrigation systems will be used to irrigate the crops that must be well managed to prevent excess percolation, surface runoff and erosion, wind drift and evaporation losses. The amount of irrigation water to apply based on the net irrigation requirements for the crop being grown can be found in the tables starting on page 3-37. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-1 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3?2 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA FIELD MAPS Fifi 3% Sous Map - ACRES .h . I . . I GIS Mpping by Northwest Ag Consuting Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3?4 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA APPLICATION The manure and irrigation application systems will be calibrated in accordance with guidance starting on page 3-5 to insure the applications of manure, bedding and runoff from the waste storage facilities are in accordance with agronomic rates. No application of wastewater or solids containing manure is to be made to the field setback areas shown on the Setback Map on page 3-9. Applications of wastewater and solids containing manure should be made in accordance with guidance starting on page 3-5 to reduce the risk of contaminated runoff to surface water sources and leaching of contaminants to ground water sources. The phosphorus runoff rating for each of the farm fields is based on the Western Oregon Phosphorus Index and is shown in the table on page 4-43. Wastewater, solids and commercial fertilizer for any field with a high runoff rating must be applied on a phosphorus basis. Wastewater, solids and commercial fertilizer for any field with a low or medium runoff rating can be applied on a nitrogen basis. No applications manure or commercial fertilizer containing phosphorus are to be made on a field with a very high phosphorus runoff rating. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR MAKING MANURE APPLICATIONS Manure applications may be made at any time of the year provided certain factors have been considered. However, the overriding factor one should use in considering whether or not to apply nutrients to a crop, irrespective of the nutrient source, is the agronomic need of the crop at the time of application. The following guidelines are to be considered once the decision has been made to make a manure application.  Manure applications may commence once T-Sum 200 has been reached for the calendar year as long as you can comply with all other permit and AWMP requirements. Calculations for T-Sum 200 are outlined in OSU Extension Fertilizer Guide for Pastures (OSU FG63, 2000). T-Sum 200 is based on accumulated heat units and is an accurate guide to estimate plant activity. Research has shown that TSum 200 is the earliest date when plant roots begin to grow in the spring and thus are receptive to applied nutrients. Surface air temperature is monitored and the daily minimum and maximum air temperatures are summed and divided by two the get the average daily air temperature then converted to centigrade (F degrees minus 32 times 0.556). Manure applications may begin once 200 heat units have been accumulated. The average date of T-Sum 200 for Fairview Acres Dairy Farm is January 30th for the 30 year average from 1981-2010. However, one must still apply manure at agronomic rates based on the estimated growth potential of the crop and anticipated climatic events. Based on crop nutrient uptake patterns, manure applications should stop when the crop is done growing for the year and before the first significant rainfall event that is expected to result in saturated soils or surface runoff. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-5 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA  Fields that are subsurface (TILE) drained require additional precautions when manure is applied. Any pre-application tillage should leave as much residue as possible on the soil surface. Water control structures installed in subsurface drainage systems should be managed to prevent discharge of manure and wastewater during periods of application.  Be aware of the location of sensitive areas, concerns of neighbors or concerns of the public, which require special application procedures. To reduce odor problems, apply wastewater and solids containing manure in mid-morning when temperatures are warming and air is rising rather than in the afternoon or evening when air is cooling and settling. Avoid applications during periods of fog.  Calibrate application equipment to insure uniform distribution and accurate application rates in accordance with guidance given in the Considerations for Manure Applications starting on page 3-6. Refer to page 3-21 for guidance on the calibration of application equipment.  Maintain setbacks for manure application from any surface waters. The management goal is not to allow manure to enter surface waters at any time. The following table shows minimum setback requirements for manure applications: Season Manure Type Liquid Liquid Solid Application Equipment Big Gun Traveler Honey Wagon Spreader Wet 70 feet 70 feet 70 feet Dry 35 feet 10 feet 10 feet Note: a. Setbacks are the distance between open waterways and manure application area. b. Setback requirements will generally increase for manures which are applied aerially (such as a traveling big gun) versus manures applied lower to the ground (such as a splash bar) due to potential for drift from wind or splashing.  Record applications, transfers or exports of nutrients (manure and fertilizer) and maintain them for at least 5 years. The CAFO Recordkeeping Calendar or the tools and forms referenced in Section 5 may be used to record this information. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-6 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3?7 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA CONSIDERATIONS FOR DRY SEASON MANURE APPLICATIONS: Apply wastewater and solids containing manure at agronomic rates shown on the table on page 3-25 using the following guidelines:  Begin making manure applications once 200 heat units (T-Sum 200) have been accumulated. The average date of T-Sum 200 for Fairview Acres Dairy Farm is January 30th for the 30 year average from 1981-2010.  Apply to land being prepared for crops. Till manure into soil within 3 days of application if possible or apply to actively growing crops such as grass, clover or alfalfa after cutting.  Do not apply during rainfall events that are expected to result in saturated soils or surface runoff.  Maintain the setback distances described on page 3-6 and shown on the Setback Map on page 3-9 when making applications of liquids or solids containing manure.  Record applications, transfers or exports of nutrients (manure and fertilizer) and maintain them for at least 5 years. The CAFO Recordkeeping Calendar or the tools and forms referenced in Section 5 may be used to record this information. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-8 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA SETBACK MAP(S) FOR FAIRVIEW ACRES DAIRY FARM Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-9 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3?1 0 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA CONSIDERATIONS FOR WET SEASON MANURE APPLICATIONS: Only apply manure during this time period if the following guidelines CAN be met. Call the ODA CAFO Program at (503) 986-4700 for guidance if a manure application is needed and the following guidelines CAN NOT be met:  Apply manure only to actively growing crops such as grass, clover or alfalfa.  Minimize application rates by using the maximum travel rates for the application equipment.  Maintain the setback distances described in the table on page 3-6 and shown on the Setback Map on page 3-9 when making applications of liquids or solids containing manure.  Do not apply during rainfall events that are expected to result in saturated soils or surface runoff.  Do not apply to saturated or flooded soils. It is recommended that application(s) be limited to soils (areas) where the flooding frequency class rating is None, Very Rare or Rare.  Do not apply to slopes greater than 5%. See the Soil Map in Section 4 for the location of soil map units with slopes greater than 5%.  Applications of wastewater or solids containing manure to frozen soils should be avoided. Do the following if an application of wastewater or solids containing manure is to be made to frozen soils: - Apply only enough wastewater or solids containing manure to address storage limitations until suitable soil conditions for application are available. - Minimize applications to 5 wet tons per acre or less of solids containing manure and 6,788 gallons (0.25 inches) per acre or less of wastewater. - Apply to alternating strips to reduce the risk of contaminated runoff reaching surface water sources. - Apply to fields of established hay, pasture or fields containing at least 90% cover and are the furthest from open water sources. - Do not apply wastewater or solids containing manure within 200 feet of surface water sources, drainageways, wells, or inlets to subsurface drainage systems. - Runoff control systems such as earthen dikes must be in place where applications will be made to fields with slopes greater than 5%.  Record applications, transfers or exports of nutrients (manure and fertilizer) and maintain them for at least 5 years. The CAFO Recordkeeping Calendar or the tools and forms referenced in Section 5 may be used to record this information.  Do not apply manure or commercial fertilizer to fields receiving applications unless the nutrients applied in the manure are less than the annual application of nutrients planned in the nutrient budget for the fields. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-11 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA MANURE AND SOIL SAMPLING FREQUENCY Sample liquids and solids containing manure during applications in early spring annually and have each sample analyzed for Total Nitrogen (TKN), Ammonium Nitrogen (NH 4-N), Phosphorus (P) and Potassium (K) plus percent moisture. Ask the lab to report results in pounds per ton for the solids containing manure and in pounds per thousand gallons for liquids containing manure. Analyses of solids and liquids containing manure should be performed by a laboratory that meets the requirements and performance standards of the Manure Testing Laboratory Certification Program (MTLCP), http://www.mda.state.mn.us/licensing/pestfert/manurelabs.htm. Collect soil samples from all fields receiving solids or liquids containing manure within a 5 year period in the fall (September 15-October 15) in accordance with Pacific Northwest (PNW) Extension publication 570-E, “Monitoring Soil Nutrients Using a Management Unit Approach” referenced in Section 5. Have the soil samples analyzed for Total Nitrogen (TKN) and Phosphorus (P) and ask the lab to report results in parts per million (ppm). Soil test analyses should be performed by laboratories that meet the requirements and performance standards of the North American Proficiency Testing Program (NAPT) Proficiency Assessment Program (PAP); http://www.naptprogram.org/pap/. HOW TO SAMPLE LIQUID MANURE Obtain a composite following one of the procedures listed below and thoroughly mix. Using a plunger, an up-and-down action works well for mixing liquid manure in a five-gallon bucket. Fill a one-quart plastic bottle not more than three-quarters full with the composite sample. Store sample in freezer if not delivered to the lab immediately. Procedure 1. Sampling from storage- Agitate storage facility thoroughly before sampling. Collect at least five samples from the storage facility or during loading using a five-gallon bucket. Place a sub sample of the composite sample in a one-quart plastic container. Sampling a liquid manure storage facility without proper agitation (2-4 hrs. minimum) is not recommended due to nutrient stratification, which occurs in liquid systems. If manure is sampled from a lagoon that was not properly agitated, typically the nitrogen and potassium will be more concentrated in the top liquid, while the phosphorus will be more concentrated in the bottom solids. Procedure 2. Sampling during application- Place buckets around field to catch manure from spreader or irrigation equipment. Combine and mix samples into one composite sub sample in a one-quart plastic container. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-12 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA HOW TO SAMPLE SOLID MANURE Collect a composite sample by following one of the procedures listed below. A method for mixing a composite sample is to pile the manure and then shovel from the outside to the inside of the pile until well mixed. Fill a one-gallon plastic heavy-duty zip lock bag approximately one-half full with the composite sample, squeeze out excess air, close and seal. Store sample in freezer if not delivered to the laboratory immediately. Procedure 1. Sampling while loading - Recommended method for sampling from a stack or bedded pack. Take at least ten samples while loading several spreader loads and combine to form one composite sample. Thoroughly mix the composite sample and take an approximately one pound sub sample using a one-gallon plastic bag. Sampling directly from a stack or bedded pack is not recommended. Procedure 2. Sampling during spreading - Spread a tarp in field and catch the manure from one pass. Sample from several locations and create a composite sample. Thoroughly mix the composite sample together and take a one-pound sub sample using a one-gallon plastic bag. Procedure 3. Sampling daily haul - Place a five-gallon bucket under the barn cleaner 4-5 times while loading a spreader. Thoroughly mix the composite sample together and take a one-pound sub sample using a one-gallon plastic bag. Repeat sampling 2-3 times over a period of time and test separately to determine variability. Procedure 4. Sampling poultry in-house - Collect 8-10 samples from throughout the house to the depth the litter will be removed. Samples near feeders and waterers may not be indicative of the entire house and sub samples taken near here should be proportionate to their space occupied in the whole house. Mix the samples well in a five-gallon pail and take a one-pound sub sample, place it in a one-gallon zip lock bag. Procedure 5. Sampling stockpiled litter - Take ten sub samples from different locations around the pile at least 18 inches below the surface. Mix in a five-gallon pail and place a one-pound composite sample in a gallon zip lock bag. Sample Identification and Delivery Identify the sample container with information regarding the farm, animal species and date. This information should also be included on the sample information sheet along with application method, which is important in determining first year availability of nitrogen. Keep all manure samples frozen until shipped or delivered to a laboratory. Ship early in the week (Mon.-Wed.) and avoid holidays and weekends. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-13 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3?1 4 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA MANURE TESTS Fairview Acres Dairy Farm LIQUID MANURE ANALYSIS Testing performed by AgSource Labs, Umatilla, Oregon Report Date Sample I.D. Total N Lbs/1,000 gallons P2O5 K2O NH4-N % Moisture % Solids 2014 M3763-5221 07/09/14 FAIRVIEW TANK 11.745 4.390 13.747 7.081 97.52 2.48 M3763-5220 07/09/14 CHAD TANK 13.578 7.062 30.203 5.331 95.27 4.73 M3763-5219 07/09/14 BOHREN TANK 7.580 2.672 18.463 4.332 98.32 1.68 M3763-5222 07/09/14 LITTLE TANK 13.245 3.054 19.266 9.496 98.25 1.75 11.537 4.295 20.420 6.560 97.34 2.66 Average- Fairview Acres Dairy Farm SOLID MANURE ANALYSIS Testing performed by AgSource Labs, Umatilla, Oregon Report Date Sample I.D. Total N Lbs/Ton P2O5 K2O NH4-N % Moisture % Solids 2014 M3763-5221 07/09/14 FAIRVIEW SOLIDS 7.340 5.408 17.202 2.420 78.23 21.77 M3763-5220 07/09/14 CHAD SOLIDS 10.460 7.562 19.804 2.760 75.82 24.18 M3763-5219 07/09/14 BOHREN SOLIDS 8.780 4.720 12.913 1.860 81.06 18.94 M3763-5222 07/09/14 LITTLE SOLIDS 8.760 5.866 31.320 2.220 78.24 21.76 Average- 8.84 5.89 20.31 2.32 78.34 21.66 Manure analyses should be performed by a laboratory that meets the requirements and performance standards of the Manure Testing Laboratory Certification Program (MTLCP), http://www.mda.state.mn.us/licensing/pestfert/manurelabs.htm. Manure should be analyzed annually for a minimum of three (3) consecutive years to develop a cumulative manure analysis history as a basis for nutrient allocation to the fields. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-15 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3?1 6 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA HOW TO SAMPLE SOILS Current soil tests must be used in the development and editing of nutrient management plans. A current soil test is one that is no older than 5 years that is used to represent the nutrient status of the entire field. Soil analysis must be performed by laboratories successfully meeting the requirements and performance standards of the North American Proficiency Testing Program-Performance Assessment Program (NAPT-PAP). Results of these analysis will be used to determine application rates for manure, litter, and process wastewater. Guidance for soil sampling can be found in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) Extension publication 570-E, “Monitoring Soil Nutrients Using a Management Unit Approach”. Oregon State university Extension publication EC1478, “Soil Test interpretation Guide” provides guidance on how to determine soil nutrient concentrations and how to adjust soil pH to improve nutrient availability. Field Area. A composite soil sample should represent a uniform field area. Each area should have similar crop and fertility history. Soil characteristics (color, slope, texture, drainage) should be similar. Exclude small areas within a field that are obviously different. The field area represented by a single composite sample should represent no more than 40 irrigated acres or 100 dry land acres. Sampling Depth. Laboratory tests are calibrated to specific depths. It is vital to collect samples from appropriate depths. Sampling depth for most soils is the rooting depth in 6inch intervals. In Oregon, as a minimum, soil samples should be collected from the 0-12” depth and from the 12-24” depth. The 0-6” surface soil samples are normally used for conventional tests of organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, pH and salt levels. Additionally, subsurface samples from the 6-24” depth are needed to estimate nitrogen availability for crops. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-17 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3?1 8 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA SOIL TESTS Fairview Acres Dairy Farm SOIL TEST RESULTS Testing performed by AgSource Labs, Umatilla, Oregon Report Report # Test Date Field Depth NO3N ppm NH4N ppm P ppm K ppm Ca meq Mg meq TB meq pH SMP OM % 10/30/2013 10/30/2013 10/30/2013 10/30/13 10/30/13 10/30/13 10/30/13 10/30/13 6" 6" 6" 6" 6" 6" 6" 6" F2-F3-F4 F9 F10 B4 B7 L1-2 C1 C2 26 23 15 22 12 19 14 24 55 48 39 25 58 19 44 45 82 36 19 66 56 39 6 22 939 826 763 1258 961 880 560 900 19.7 12.8 8.1 20.0 18.2 22.4 10.3 10.8 6.9 5.2 3.9 6.4 6.4 7.3 4.0 3.9 29.7 20.6 14.4 30.2 27.5 32.6 16.2 17.2 6.0 5.7 5.4 5.9 6.0 6.1 5.6 5.4 5.9 5.5 5.3 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.3 5.2 18.2 21.2 19.5 12.9 18.6 14.4 19.8 18.4 10/22/12 10/22/12 10/22/12 10/22/12 10/22/12 10/22/12 10/22/12 10/22/12 10/22/12 10/22/12 6" 6" 6" 6" 6" 6" 6" 6" 6" 6" F1+F3E+F5 F6-F7 B3 B5 L3 C3 C4-5 C6 D2 Hogden 19 24 19 18 38 17 14 14 14 25 50 50 9 58 50 40 44 29 29 4 57 86 27 48 49 38 42 26 26 39 848 888 554 941 1534 845 487 536 536 645 17.1 18.9 20.4 18.7 17.9 12.7 10.4 7.8 7.8 13.2 6.1 7.1 5.4 6.1 8.1 4.9 4.2 3.8 3.8 5.9 25.4 28.3 27.2 27.2 29.9 19.8 15.8 13.0 13 20.7 6.0 6.2 6.0 6.0 6.3 5.8 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.7 5.9 6.0 6.2 6.0 5.9 5.6 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/13/08 10/13/08 10/13/08 10/13/08 6" 6" 6" 6" B1-B2 E1 E2 E3 13 4 17 9 28 19 35 31 38 19 34 32 940 452 900 755 20.1 20.1 18.3 18.1 6.3 5.3 5.7 5.6 28.8 26.6 26.3 25.6 6.4 6.4 6.1 6.3 6.2 5.9 6.0 5.9 NA NA NA NA 10/03/07 10/03/07 6" 6" F2 B5-B6 20 20 48 35 59 54 759 1054 1.7 16.5 4.9 5.9 8.5 25.1 6.1 5.9 5.9 5.7 NA NA 2013 S403 S403 S403 S403 S403 S403 S403 S403 2012 S6446 S6446 S6446 S6446 S6446 S6446 S6446 S6446 S6446 S6446 2008 S7079 S7079 S7079 S7079 2007 S2430 S2430 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-19 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA Fairview Acres Dairy Farm SOIL TEST RESULTS Testing performed by AgSource Labs, Umatilla, Oregon Report Report # S2430 S2430 Test Date Field Depth 10/03/07 10/03/07 6" 6" L3 D1-2 NO3N ppm 33 20 NH4N ppm 41 31 P ppm 29 23 K ppm 1086 491 Ca meq 10.1 4.6 Mg meq 5.1 2.6 TB meq 18.0 8.5 pH SMP 5.9 5.4 5.6 5.2 Soil test analyses should be performed by laboratories that meet the requirements and performance standards of the North American Proficiency Testing Program (NAPT) Proficiency Assessment Program (PAP); http://www.naptprogram.org/pap/. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-20 OM % NA NA Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA HOW TO CALIBRATE APPLICATION EQUIPMENT Calibration of application equipment is a critical part of nutrient management. Calibration should be completed at least annually to insure manure and fertilizer will be uniformly applied. There are two basic approaches for calibrating a manure spreader – the load area and the weight area methods. The load area method is more accurate and can be used for both liquid and solid manure. The weight area method works only with solid or semi-solid manure. Irrigation System Calibration Place 3-5 buckets throughout the irrigation spray pattern and collect samples while operating the pump at a given rpm and pressure (for a traveling gun record the travel speed also). At the end of the planned sample period measure the amount of liquid collected in inches (average the samples). The following chart shows how many gallons per acre applied per inch of liquid applied: Inches Liquid Manure Applied via Irrigation: 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 Gallons per Acre: 5,431 8,146 10,862 13,577 20,366 27,154 33,943 40,731 Soft Hose Injection System with Irrigation Hose: Alternative 1. Use a flow meter mounted on the injector system and calculate the distance and width to determine amount applied over a measured area. Example the flow meter measures 1,000 gallons over a distance of 600 feet and 10 feet wide. Formula: Application Rate (7,260 gallons/acre) = (Gallons Applied (1,000 gal) X 43,560 sq. ft/acre) divided by (Distance traveled (600 ft) X Application width (10 ft)) Alternative 2. (Requires a 10-20 gallon graduated measuring container) Step 1) In the field, measure the flow out of one injector for 5 seconds into the graduated measuring container and record gallons, repeat three (3) times and average the results. Step 2) Multiply the average amount collected from one injector by the number of injectors (equals amount applied for the whole system for 5 seconds). Step 3) Multiply the results of Step 2 times 12 to get gallons per minute. Step 4) Place the injector in the soil at the planned depth and operating speed and record the distance traveled in 1 minute (average 3 different measurements). Step 5) Determine the effective application width (number of injectors X injector spacing in feet). Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-21 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA Step 6) Multiply the effective width times the distance traveled in 1 minute (this gives the square feet covered in 1 minute). Step 7) Divide the result of Step 6 by 43,560 (this gives the acres covered in 1 minute). Step 8) Divide the results of Step 3 (gallons per minute) by the results of Step 7 (acres covered in 1 minute) - (this gives the gallons applied per acre. For example: Step 1) Collect an average of 6 gallons from one injector for 5 seconds. Step 2) Applicator has 8 injectors (8 injectors X 6 gallons per injector = 48 gallons for 5 seconds) Step 3) 48 gallons in 5 seconds X 12 = 576 gallons/minute applied Step 4) Average distance covered in 1 minute was 250 feet Step 5) Average width of the applicator is 12 feet. Step 6) 12 feet wide X 250 feet long = 3000 square feet Step 7) 3000 square feet divided by 43,560 square feet/acre = .0688 acres covered in 1 minute Step 8) 576 gallons/minute divided by .0688 acres/minute = 8,372 gallons/acre. Manure Spreader/Tanker Calibration There are several methods that can be used to calibrate the application rate of a manure spreader. The two best methods are the load-area method and the weight-area method. It is desirable to repeat the calibration procedure 2 to 3 times and average the results to establish a more accurate calibration. Before calibrating a manure spreader, the spreader settings such as splash plates should be adjusted so that the spread is uniform. Most spreaders tend to deposit more manure near the middle than at the edge of the spread pattern. Overlapping can make the overall application more uniform. Calibrating application rates when overlapping is involved requires measuring the width of two spreads and dividing by two to get the effective spread width. Calibration should take place annually or whenever manure is being applied from a different source or consistency. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-22 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA Load-Area Method: The load-area method is the most accurate and can be used for both liquid and soild manure. The load area method is a 3-step process: Step 1) Determine the amount of manure in the spreader. The most accurate way to determine the amount of manure in a spreader is weighting the spreader when it is empty and again when it is full. For a reliable estimate of spreader capacity, weigh several representative loads (at least five) to determine the average gross weight. Subtract the empty spreader weight. Then, calculate the average net loaded weight. Step 2) Determine the area of spread using the method at the right. Width measurements near the beginning and end of the spread pattern should be avoided because the spreader may not be operating at full capacity. Step 3) Calculate the application rate. The application rate is calculated using the formula for either liquid or solid manure. Formula for Solid Manure Equals Tons/Acre (Average Loaded Weight (lbs) x 21.81) divided by (Distance Traveled (ft) x Width of Spread (ft)) Formula for Liquid Manure Equals Gal/Acre (Tank Volume (gal) x 43,560) divided by (Distance Traveled (ft) x Width of Spread (ft)) Weight-Area Method: The weight-area method can only be used with solid or semi-solid manure. When a scale is not available, the application rate of a box spreader can be determined by collecting manure on a tarp or piece of heavy material. The weight area method is less accurate than the load area method. This method consists of eight steps: Step 1) Prepare/cut three 56-inch square tarps or pieces of heavy material (this size equals 1/2,000 of an acre). The pounds of manure collected on 56 inches square equals tons applied per acre. Step 2) Weigh one of the clean tarps and a large bucket on a platform scale. Record the weight. Step 3) Anchor the three tarps in the field ahead of the spreader near the beginning, middle, and end of the area that will be spread with one load. Step 4) Drive over the three tarps at a normal speed to collect a representative manure sample. Step 5) Fold and place the first tarp into the empty bucket without spilling the manure. Weigh the bucket, tarp, and manure. Subtract the weight of the clean tarp and bucket recorded in step 2. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-23 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA Step 6) Repeat the process for each of the two remaining tarps. Calculate the average weight (pounds) of the manure collected. This value equals tons of manure applied per acre. Factor for converting pounds to tons and square feet to acres (21.8 = 43,560 sq ft per acre divided by 2,000 lbs/ton). The factor for converting square feet to acres = 43,560 sq ft per acre. Step 7) Determining Area of Spread. The “area of spread” is the length and width of the ground covered with one load of manure. The area of spread is affected by speed and equipment settings. Spreaders discharge manure at varying rates depending on travel and PTO speed, gear box settings, and discharge openings. It is important to adjust the spreader so the pattern is as uniform as possible. Accurately measuring the length and width of this area is essential. To determine width, measure two adjacent spreads and divide by two to find the “effective” spread width. This accounts for overlap, which is often needed for a more uniform application. The length of spread is determined using the following three values: 1. Desired manure application rate based on soil and manure tests, 2. Width of the manure spread, and 3. Manure spreader holding capacity (weight and/or volume). From these values, calculate the distance or lengths of spread using these formulas: Formula: Solid Manure Equals Feet/Load (Average Load Weight (lbs) x 21.81) divided by (Spread Width (ft) x App. Rate (tons/ac)) Formula: Liquid Manure Equals Feet/Load (Tank Volume (gal) x 43,560) divided by (Spread Width (ft) x Desired App. Rate (gal/ac)) Step 8) Spread a load. If the distance traveled does not equal the calculated distance, adjust the speed or equipment settings. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-24 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA AMOUNT OF MANURE TO APPLY FOR CROPS GROWN The timing and frequency of applications of wastewater and solids containing manure for utilization by crops shown in the table below are based on information provided in Oregon State University Extension publications listed in Section 5. The formulas for determining the total nutrient application rate per unit yield for each crop shown in the table below are as follows: Total N to apply in pounds = N in pounds per yield unit from the table for the crop grown X percent (%) dry matter (DM) of harvested crop/100 X planned or measured yield per yield unit Total P2O5 to apply in pounds = P in pounds per yield unit from the table for the crop grown X 2.291 P2O5/P X percent (%) dry matter (DM) of harvested crop/100 X planned or measured yield per yield unit Total K2O to apply in pounds = K in pounds per yield unit from the table for the crop grown X 1.205 K2O/K X percent (%) dry matter (DM) of harvested crop/100 X planned or measured yield per yield unit The following table shows the crops that may be grown on this farm: Nutrient Removal (lb/yield unit) FRUIT OR VEGETABLES Beans, dry edible Blueberries Caneberries Corn, Sweet Mixed Vegetables & Fruit Onions Orchard, Fruit Pea, edible Potatoes Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Yield Unit cwt ton ton ton ton cwt ton ton ton Page 3-25 lb/Unit 100 2000 2000 2000 2000 100 2000 2000 2000 % DM 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 N 3.13 2.14 11.43 17.80 8.33 0.30 13.00 73.60 6.60 P 0.45 0.20 7.42 4.8 2.08 0.06 2.00 8.00 1.20 K 0.85 3.54 11.43 11.6 10.20 0..22 16.00 18.00 10.33 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA Nutrient Removal (lb/yield unit) GRAIN, SEED OR OIL CROPS Barley Beets, sugar Canola Corn, grain shelled Crimson Clover seed Fescue Seed, Straw Removed Fescue, seed (Fine or Tall) Grass Seed Grass Seed, Straw Removed Oats, grain Orchardgrass seed Peppermint for Oil Peppermint for Oil, Leaves and Stems Removed Pumpkins Red Clover seed Ryegrass Seed Ryegrass, Perennial Seed Wheat, Soft White for grain Wheat, Soft White Straw Removed Wheat, Hard Red for grain Wheat, Soft White Straw Removed Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Yield Unit bushels ton ton bushels lb cwt lb cwt ton bushels lb ton ton ton lb cwt lb bushels ton bushels ton Page 3-26 lb/Unit 48 2000 2000 56 1 100 1 100 2000 32 1 2000 2000 2000 1 100 1 60 2000 60 2000 % DM 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 N 0.87 4.00 70.00 0.90 0.05 10.03 0.02 1.60 33.90 0.62 0.016 4.20 87.2 4.00 0.05 1.60 0.02 1.00 43.40 1.60 83.40 P 0.16 0.60 12.00 0.16 0.01 1.08 0.00 0.20 5.50 0.11 0.002 1.80 36.8 1.40 0.01 0.20 0.002 0.24 8.90 0.37 17.10 K 0.21 2.78 18.00 0.22 0.02 8.33 0.00 0.40 34.40 0.16 0.004 2.80 57.8 6.60 0.02 0.40 0.004 0.21 20.90 0.31 37.10 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA Nutrient Removal (lb/yield unit) HAY AND PASTURE CROPS Alfalfa, Hay Alta Fescue Hay/Pasture Grass Legume Hay/Pasture Meadow Fescue Hay/Pasture Oats Hay/Pasture Orchardgrass Hay/Pasture Perennial Hay/Pasture (Low Intensity) Perennial Hay/Pasture (Low-Med Intensity) Perennial Hay/Pasture (Medium Intensity) Perennial Hay/Pasture (Med- High Intensity) Perennial Hay/Pasture (High Intensity) Ryegrass Hay Ryegrass, Perennial Pasture Tall Fescue Hay/Pasture Yield Unit ton ton ton ton ton ton ton ton ton ton ton ton ton ton lb/Unit 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 % DM 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 N 64.00 33.00 33.90 41.60 60.00 53.20 32.00 38.00 48.00 58.00 64.00 33.40 58.00 39.40 P 8.00 6.90 5.50 8.80 10.20 8.60 6.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 8.00 5.40 8.00 4.00 K 42.00 37.60 34.40 47.40 14.80 18.60 38.00 38.00 38.00 40.00 40.00 28.40 48.00 40.00 Nutrient Removal (lb/yield unit) SILAGE AND HAYLAGE CROPS Corn for Silage Crimson Clover forage Field Pea, Forage Oat haylage Oats & Peas/ Green Beans Red Clover forage Ryegrass Haylage Sorghum-Sudan Haylage Triticale Haylage Wheatgrass Hay/Pasture Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Yield Unit ton ton ton ton ton ton ton ton ton ton Page 3-27 lb/Unit 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 % DM 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 N 7.50 40.00 73.60 60.00 32.03 40.00 50.00 54.33 49.00 28.40 P 1.20 4.41 8.00 10.20 5.58 4.41 8.00 6.33 6.80 5.40 K 6.00 32.98 18.00 14.80 18.65 32.98 42.67 58.00 11.40 53.60 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA Nutrient Removal (lb/yield unit) OTHER CROPS Hops, Cones Natural Area (Trees and Grass) Nursery Stock Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Yield Unit bale ton ton Page 3-28 lb/Unit 200 2000 2000 % DM 100 100 100 N 9.00 10.52 8.33 P 0.96 1.56 2.08 K 5.00 9.20 10.20 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA FAIRVIEW ACRES DAIRY FARM SOLIDS APPLICATION CHART Test Date: 07/09/14 Source: Solids Stack FAIRVIEW ACRES DAIRY FARM WASTEWATER APPLICATION CHART MANURE ANALYSIS MANURE ANALYSIS (As received lb/ton) P2O5 K2O Total N 7.34 5.41 17.20 (As received lb/1000 gal) P2O5 K2O Total N 11.75 4.39 13.75 Test Date: Source: 07/09/14 Tank Manure Nutrient Content Manure Applied Thickness to apply (Tons/Ac) (inches/Ac) 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 0.013 0.020 0.026 0.033 0.039 0.046 0.052 0.059 0.066 0.072 0.079 0.085 0.092 0.098 0.105 0.111 0.118 0.124 0.131 0.138 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Manure Nutrient Content Total N P2O5 K2O (lb/A) 7 11 15 18 22 26 29 33 37 40 44 48 51 55 59 62 66 70 73 77 (lb/A) 5 8 11 14 16 19 22 24 27 30 32 35 38 41 43 46 49 51 54 57 (lb/A) 17 26 34 43 52 60 69 77 86 95 103 112 120 129 138 146 155 163 172 181 Manure Applied Thickness to apply (Gallons/Ac) (inches/Ac) 2,715 5,431 8,146 10,862 13,577 16,292 19,008 21,723 24,439 27,154 29,869 32,585 35,300 38,016 40,731 43,446 46,162 48,877 51,593 54,308 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 Page 3-29 Total N P2O5 K2O (lb/A) 32 64 96 128 159 191 223 255 287 319 351 383 415 447 478 510 542 574 606 638 (lb/A) 12 24 36 48 60 72 83 95 107 119 131 143 155 167 179 191 203 215 226 238 (lb/A) 37 75 112 149 187 224 261 299 336 373 411 448 485 523 560 597 635 672 709 747 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA CHAD ACRES FARM SOLIDS APPLICATION CHART Test Date: 07/09/14 Source: Solids Stack CHAD ACRES FARM WASTEWATER APPLICATION CHART MANURE ANALYSIS MANURE ANALYSIS (As received lb/ton) P2O5 K2O Total N 10.46 7.56 19.80 (As received lb/1000 gal) P2O5 K2O Total N 13.58 7.06 30.20 Test Date: Source: 07/09/14 Tank Manure Nutrient Content Manure Applied Thickness to apply (Tons/Ac) (inches/Ac) 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 0.013 0.020 0.026 0.033 0.039 0.046 0.052 0.059 0.066 0.072 0.079 0.085 0.092 0.098 0.105 0.111 0.118 0.124 0.131 0.138 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Manure Nutrient Content Total N P2O5 K2O (lb/A) 10 16 21 26 31 37 42 47 52 58 63 68 73 78 84 89 94 99 105 110 (lb/A) 8 11 15 19 23 26 30 34 38 42 45 49 53 57 60 64 68 72 76 79 (lb/A) 20 30 40 50 59 69 79 89 99 109 119 129 139 149 158 168 178 188 198 208 Manure Applied Thickness to apply (Gallons/Ac) (inches/Ac) 2,715 5,431 8,146 10,862 13,577 16,292 19,008 21,723 24,439 27,154 29,869 32,585 35,300 38,016 40,731 43,446 46,162 48,877 51,593 54,308 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 Page 3-30 Total N P2O5 K2O (lb/A) 37 74 111 147 184 221 258 295 332 369 406 442 479 516 553 590 627 664 701 737 (lb/A) 19 38 58 77 96 115 134 153 173 192 211 230 249 268 288 307 326 345 364 384 (lb/A) 82 164 246 328 410 492 574 656 738 820 902 984 1066 1148 1230 1312 1394 1476 1558 1640 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA BOHERN FARM SOLIDS APPLICATION CHART Test Date: 07/09/14 Source: Solids Stack BOHERN FARM WASTEWATER APPLICATION CHART MANURE ANALYSIS MANURE ANALYSIS (As received lb/ton) P2O5 K2O Total N 8.78 4.72 12.91 (As received lb/1000 gal) P2O5 K2O Total N 7.58 2.67 18.46 Test Date: Source: 07/09/14 Tank Manure Nutrient Content Manure Applied Thickness to apply (Tons/Ac) (inches/Ac) 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 0.013 0.020 0.026 0.033 0.039 0.046 0.052 0.059 0.066 0.072 0.079 0.085 0.092 0.098 0.105 0.111 0.118 0.124 0.131 0.138 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Manure Nutrient Content Total N P2O5 K2O (lb/A) 9 13 18 22 26 31 35 40 44 48 53 57 61 66 70 75 79 83 88 92 (lb/A) 5 7 9 12 14 17 19 21 24 26 28 31 33 35 38 40 42 45 47 50 (lb/A) 13 19 26 32 39 45 52 58 65 71 77 84 90 97 103 110 116 123 129 136 Manure Applied Thickness to apply (Gallons/Ac) (inches/Ac) 2,715 5,431 8,146 10,862 13,577 16,292 19,008 21,723 24,439 27,154 29,869 32,585 35,300 38,016 40,731 43,446 46,162 48,877 51,593 54,308 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 Page 3-31 Total N P2O5 K2O (lb/A) 21 41 62 82 103 124 144 165 185 206 226 247 268 288 309 329 350 371 391 412 (lb/A) 7 15 22 29 36 44 51 58 65 73 80 87 94 102 109 116 123 131 138 145 (lb/A) 50 100 150 201 251 301 351 401 451 501 551 602 652 702 752 802 852 902 953 1003 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA LITTLE DAIRY FARM SOLIDS APPLICATION CHART Test Date: 08/13/14 Source: Solids Stack LITTLE DAIRY FARM WASTEWATER APPLICATION CHART MANURE ANALYSIS MANURE ANALYSIS (As received lb/ton) P2O5 K2O Total N 8.76 5.87 31.32 (As received lb/1000 gal) P2O5 K2O Total N 13.24 3.05 19.27 Test Date: Source: 07/09/14 Tank Manure Nutrient Content Manure Applied Thickness to apply (Tons/Ac) (inches/Ac) 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 0.013 0.020 0.026 0.033 0.039 0.046 0.052 0.059 0.066 0.072 0.079 0.085 0.092 0.098 0.105 0.111 0.118 0.124 0.131 0.138 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Manure Nutrient Content Total N P2O5 K2O (lb/A) 9 13 18 22 26 31 35 39 44 48 53 57 61 66 70 74 79 83 88 92 (lb/A) 6 9 12 15 18 21 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 50 53 56 59 62 (lb/A) 31 47 63 78 94 110 125 141 157 172 188 204 219 235 251 266 282 298 313 329 Manure Applied Thickness to apply (Gallons/Ac) (inches/Ac) 2,715 5,431 8,146 10,862 13,577 16,292 19,008 21,723 24,439 27,154 29,869 32,585 35,300 38,016 40,731 43,446 46,162 48,877 51,593 54,308 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 Page 3-32 Total N P2O5 K2O (lb/A) 36 72 108 144 180 216 252 288 324 360 396 432 468 504 539 575 611 647 683 719 (lb/A) 8 17 25 33 41 50 58 66 75 83 91 100 108 116 124 133 141 149 158 166 (lb/A) 52 105 157 209 262 314 366 419 471 523 575 628 680 732 785 837 889 942 994 1046 Section 3 TILIZA TION AREA NUTRIENT APPLICATION CHART for WASTEWATER 14 3,500 12 Nutrients? to Apply 3.000 ?o?50 lb Ta, 10 -l:l?100 lb 2,500 lb :5 ?o?200 lb .5 8 2,000 .5 6 1,500 '5 4 1,000 5? 2 500 0 0 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 2 Application in Inches Nutrient Concentration in Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3?33 Section 3 Nutrient Concentration in ton TILIZA TION AREA NUTRIENT APPLICATION CHART for SOLIDS 20 Nutrients to Apply 16 1 +100 lb +150?) -o?200Application in Tons/Acre Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3?34 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA IRRIGATION WATER MANAGEMENT The application of Irrigation Water Management to the irrigated fields as shown on the Field Map will manage soil moisture to promote the desired crop response, optimize the available water supplies, minimize irrigation induced erosion, decrease non-point source pollution of surface and groundwater sources, manage salts in the crop root zone and manage the crop micro climate. Irrigation water is supplied by wells and surface water sources using pumps through pipelines to sprinkler irrigation systems. The average amount of irrigation water to be applied per application and total annual amount needed for irrigated crops with guidance on when and how much irrigation water to apply can be found starting on page 3-37. Permits: Under Oregon law all water is publicly owned and anyone planning to store or divert surface or groundwater for the purpose of irrigation must obtain a permit or water right from the Oregon Water Resources Department. These permits or water rights must be obtained prior to the use of the water. It is the responsibility of the Farmer to file for the necessary permits or water rights. Permits or water rights are not needed to apply wastewater as a nutrient source. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-35 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA Irrigation Water Flows, Volumes, and Relationships Equation 1- Equation 2- Q  453A D F H Q T  D  A where: Q = flow rate (acre-in/hr or cfs) T = time (hr) D = gross depth applied (in) A = area (acres) where: Q = flow rate (gpm) A = area (acres) D = gross application depth (in) F = irrigation period (days) H = hours of operation per day Water Volumes & Weights: 1 cubic foot = 7.48 gallons = 62.4 lb = 28.3 liters 1 acre-foot = 43,560 cubic feet (1 acre covered 1 ft deep) 12 acre-in = 1 acre-ft = 325,829 gal 1 million gallons = 3.07 acre-ft 1 acre-ft = 1,234 cubic meters 1 cu meter = 1,000 liters = 35.3 cu ft Water Flow Rates: 1 cubic foot per second (cfs) = 448.8 gallons per minute 1 cfs for 1 hour = 0.99 acre-inch 1 cfs for 24 hr = 1.98 acre-ft 1,000 gpm = 2.23 cfs 1,000 gpm for 24 hr = 4.42 ac-ft 1 gpm/acre = 0.053 ac-in/ac/day 1 cfs = 40 miner’s inches in OR, No CA 1 cfs = 50 miner’s inches in ID, WA 1 miner’s inch = 11.22 gpm in OR 1 miner’s inch = 9 gpm in ID, WA 1 cfs = 28.32 liters/sec 1 cubic meter/sec = 35.3 cfs 1 liter/sec = 15.85 gpm Pressure and Pressure Head: 1 psi = 2.31 ft of pressure head 1 atmosphere (sea level) = 14.7 psi = 33.9 ft of head Lengths and Areas: 1 mile = 5,280 ft = 1.61 km 1 meter = 3.28 ft = 39.37 inches 1 acre = 43,560 square ft 1 hectare = 2.47 acres Q x T = D x A where: Q = cfs, T = hr; D = inches depth; A = acres Gpm for 5 ft/s velocity in PVC pipe: 6” 8” 10” 12” 14” 480 800 1250 1750 2150 Pump Power Requirement Horsepower  Natural Resources Conservation Service Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-36 Pump Head in ft x gpm 39.6 x % Pump Efficiency Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA SOILSBased on the Natural Resources Conservation Service National Engineering Handbook, Part 652, National Irrigation Guide, the irrigated soils on this farm have an average water holding capacity of 0.20 to 0.40 inches per inch of soil depth and a soil intake rate of 0.45 to 0.50 inches per hour. CROPSMAXIMUM ALLOWED DEPLETION 50% MATURE ROOT DEPTH (INCHES) 30 CROP Grass Hay/Pasture CRITICAL PERIOD July Above data are from EM8713, Western Oregon Irrigation Guides, June 1998, OSU: Corvallis, OR and NRCS Irrigation Guide (National Engineering Handbook, Part 652). IRRIGATION WATER SUPPLYDescription of Oregon Water Right: Description of Irrigation Water Supply (Well, Stream, Irrigation District, etc.): Supply Flowrate (gpm or cfs): Annual Volume Available (Acre-ft.): Water Delivery Schedule: Method(s) of Water Measurement: Certificates- 21791, 21756, 38726, 50626 Claim- GR3343 Wells and Surface Water Sources 907 gpm or 2.02 cfs 404 AF On Demand NA IRRIGATION SYSTEM- System Traveling Big Gun Sprinkler System Capacity (gpm) Nozzle Size (in) Pressure (psi) Spacing (ft) Application Rate (in/hr) System Efficiency (%) 335 1.1 80 to 90 180 to 240 0.4 to 0.5 65 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-37 Section 3 UTILIZATION AREA Irrigation Water Management Worksheet Crop Name: Hay/Pasture Land Managed Rooting Depth (inches): 30 Management Allowed Depletion, MAD: 50% Irrigated Acres: 529 Soil Name: Nehalem, Nestucca, Quillamook, Tillamook-Ginger Soil Depth (inches): 80 Available Water Capacity (in/in): 0.20 Soil Intake Rate (in/hr) : 0.45 IRRIGATION REQUIREMENT HOW MUCH water to apply? Month April May June July August Sept Soil or Root Depth * Available Water Capacity 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Total Plant Available Water Capacity * MAD 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Determined based on the type of Irrigation System 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.35 2.17 2.64 3.70 3.03 2.09 0.01 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.10 0.07 Net Irrigation Application / Daily Crop Water Use 30 31 30 25 31 30 Irrigation System Set Time (hours): 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 30 29 23 17 20 29 Water Required / Water Applied 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% System Application Rate * System Set Time 2.85 2.85 2.85 2.85 2.85 2.85 Gross Irrigation Application * Irrigated Acres 1508 1508 1508 1508 1508 1508 16 16 16 16 16 16 1,423 1,498 1,883 2,554 2,091 1,491 Total Plant Available Water Capacity (in): Net Irrigation Application (in): Irrigation System Application Rate (in/hr): IRRIGATION TIMING WHEN to apply water? Net Irrigation Water Requirement (in): (From OSU Extension Miscellaneous Pub 8530, 1992) Average Daily Crop Water Use (in/day): Irrigation Frequency (days): Actual Net Irrigation Application (in): Gross Application * System Application Efficiency Actual Irrigation Frequency (days): Ac tual Net Irrigation Applic ation / Daily Crop Water Use IRRIGATION SYSTEM CAPACITY System Application Efficiency (%): Gross Irrigation Application (in): Volume of Water per Irrigation (acre-in): Irrigation System Operation (hours/day): Required System Flow Rate (gpm): (Equation 2) Compare Required system flow rate with M easured flow noted on Irrigation Application Record Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 3-38 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT SOIL APS FARMS Inn-n. ?Soils MapLawn - . 173 7 33.SCALE: 1 inch 1450 feet .1 . Mapping by Northwest Ag Consulting - mm?- Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-1 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT 3n: County. Dregcn Fail'nliew Acres 13.3 "f Map Unit Legend County. Ore-gun Map Unit Symbol "3p Unit Name Flu-es in ADI Percent anDl 43.5 1 1?3 slnpes 213-13 Klemrie-Necricsn 5511;: ex 3?3 5 to 33 percent slepes 20E Klemrie-Necricsn 5511p ex 3.2 1?1? 33 to BC- pe'cem slepes 2' wm-Ascar?Klemrie 33-; currnlex. 331d 33 deroent slnpes 3' Tolnlrana-Terrn eta" media 5 33.4 3'71"? Ica'ns. 33 In 33 percent slopes 3313 Tolmrana 'neca silt 15.311 5 11:- TQJSI 2 1?1? 33 percent slcpes 463 Hebn silty clay-15.311 In 5 23?.3 3 3?3 pe'eem slczes 333 Wolf? media 5 tlnam. 31-: 5 3.3 3?3 pe'eem sldzes 5T3 Conderb'cge grave- yr rredial 33.5 1 33-; 15311 to 7" percent sldpes 5TB Conderb'cge grave- yr rredial 53.5 1 43-; 15311 3 to 15 pe'eeni sldpes 55-3 Knanna n'eeial silt carr. 3 to 15 7.3 33-; pe*cen1 sldzes Til-F. Nehalern silt lens-n. CI to 3 445.2 12 13's pe*cen1 sldzes T5411 Nestucca It ldarn. ta 3 3 23's pewem sldzes TM Nestucca-Brenner 1 lnarns. CI 1.33 3 2'71"? tn 3 Fe 'cen1slcpes 333 Dui a'ndcul: rrecial silt 1-5311 313.? 3 3'71"? to pe 'cen1slcpes 3' Dui a'ndcul: dc?plex to 5?1.5 15 5'71"? per'cem slczes 33F. lei'l'mems-H vemash-Wam' 1 5'71"? currnlex. 31D 3 slnpes 93-h Yachats IIve 53":51' usrr. '35.4 2 3?3 ti:- 3 pe 'een1sldpes 94E: Ginger-Quillamcck-L'rban land 243.3 cdn?nlex. 31:- dense-"1 slnpes '3'33 "arrest-Ginger rrecial silt T4133 33 1'75"? lda'ns. 31:: neroent sap-es "arrest-Ginger rrecial silt 2 1'75"? lda'ns. 3 In 15 '3313 rrecial silt 373.3l 13 1'75"? lda'ns. 5 In 33 Totals for Area of Interest 3,333.41 133.331: Page 4?2 Section 4 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT SOIL REPORTS Map Unit Description The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions in this report, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. All the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of a given series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-3 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. Additional information about the map units described in this report is available in other soil reports, which give properties of the soils and the limitations, capabilities, and potentials for many uses. Also, the narratives that accompany the soil reports define some of the properties included in the map unit descriptions. Report—Map Unit Description Tillamook County, Oregon 1A—Brenner silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 27z0 Elevation: 10 to 200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 300 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Brenner and similar soils: 85 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Brenner Setting Landform: Flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 7 inches: silt loam A - 7 to 12 inches: silty clay loam Bw1 - 12 to 18 inches: silty clay loam Bw2 - 18 to 26 inches: silty clay loam BC - 26 to 40 inches: silty clay loam Cg1 - 40 to 55 inches: silty clay Cg2 - 55 to 60 inches: silty clay Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-4 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 to 7 inches Frequency of flooding: Frequent Frequency of ponding: Frequent Available water storage in profile: High (about 11.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA008OR) 20D—Klootchie-Necanicum complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 27xq Elevation: 50 to 1,800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 110 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 120 to 210 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Klootchie and similar soils: 60 percent Necanicum and similar soils: 25 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Klootchie Setting Landform: Mountain slopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, toeslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountaintop, mountainbase Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Concave, linear Parent material: Colluvium and residuum derived from igneous rock and tuff Typical profile Oi - 0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant material A1 - 1 to 9 inches: medial silt loam A2 - 9 to 19 inches: medial silt loam Bw1 - 19 to 44 inches: medial silty clay loam Bw2 - 44 to 68 inches: medial silty clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 5 to 30 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 19.1 inches) Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-5 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903) Description of Necanicum Setting Landform: Mountain slopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountaintop, mountainbase Down-slope shape: Convex, linear Across-slope shape: Convex, linear Parent material: Colluvium derived from igneous rock and tuff Typical profile Oi - 0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant material A1 - 1 to 10 inches: very gravelly medial loam A2 - 10 to 18 inches: very gravelly medial loam Bw1 - 18 to 27 inches: very gravelly medial loam Bw2 - 27 to 49 inches: extremely cobbly medial loam Bw3 - 49 to 71 inches: extremely cobbly medial loam Properties and qualities Slope: 5 to 30 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903) 20E—Klootchie-Necanicum complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 27x3 Elevation: 50 to 1,800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 110 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 120 to 210 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Klootchie and similar soils: 55 percent Necanicum and similar soils: 30 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-6 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Description of Klootchie Setting Landform: Mountain slopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Center third of mountainflank, lower third of mountainflank Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Concave, linear Parent material: Colluvium and residuum derived from igneous rock and tuff Typical profile Oi - 0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant material A1 - 1 to 9 inches: medial silt loam A2 - 9 to 19 inches: medial silt loam Bw1 - 19 to 44 inches: medial silty clay loam Bw2 - 44 to 68 inches: medial silty clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 30 to 60 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 19.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/oxalis, swordfern-moist(902) Description of Necanicum Setting Landform: Mountain slopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Upper third of mountainflank, lower third of mountainflank Down-slope shape: Linear, convex Across-slope shape: Convex, linear Parent material: Colluvium derived from igneous rock and tuff Typical profile Oi - 0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant material A1 - 1 to 10 inches: very gravelly medial loam A2 - 10 to 18 inches: very gravelly medial loam Bw1 - 18 to 27 inches: very gravelly medial loam Bw2 - 27 to 49 inches: extremely cobbly medial loam Bw3 - 49 to 71 inches: extremely cobbly medial loam Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-7 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Properties and qualities Slope: 30 to 60 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/oxalis, swordfern-moist(902) 21F—Necanicum-Ascar-Klootchie complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 27xv Elevation: 50 to 1,800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 110 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 120 to 210 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Necanicum and similar soils: 40 percent Ascar and similar soils: 25 percent Klootchie and similar soils: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Necanicum Setting Landform: Mountain slopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Center third of mountainflank, lower third of mountainflank Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Colluvium derived from igneous rock Typical profile Oi - 0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant material A1 - 1 to 10 inches: very gravelly medial loam A2 - 10 to 18 inches: very gravelly medial loam Bw1 - 18 to 27 inches: very gravelly medial loam Bw2 - 27 to 49 inches: extremely cobbly medial loam Bw3 - 49 to 71 inches: extremely cobbly medial loam Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-8 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Properties and qualities Slope: 60 to 90 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/oxalis, swordfern-moist(902) Description of Ascar Setting Landform: Mountain slopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Upper third of mountainflank Down-slope shape: Concave, linear Across-slope shape: Convex, linear Parent material: Colluvium derived from igneous rock Typical profile Oi - 0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant material A1 - 1 to 9 inches: extremely gravelly medial loam A2 - 9 to 25 inches: extremely cobbly medial loam Bw - 25 to 39 inches: extremely cobbly medial loam R - 39 to 43 inches: unweathered bedrock Properties and qualities Slope: 60 to 90 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to lithic bedrock Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/oxalis, swordfern-moist(902) Description of Klootchie Setting Landform: Mountain slopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Lower third of mountainflank Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Concave Parent material: Colluvium and residuum derived from igneous rock Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-9 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Typical profile Oi - 0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant material A1 - 1 to 9 inches: medial silt loam A2 - 9 to 19 inches: medial silt loam Bw1 - 19 to 44 inches: medial silty clay loam Bw2 - 44 to 68 inches: medial silty clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 60 to 90 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 19.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/oxalis, swordfern-moist(902) 31E—Tolovana-Templeton medial silt loams, 30 to 60 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 27v8 Elevation: 50 to 1,800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 110 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 120 to 210 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Tolovana and similar soils: 50 percent Templeton and similar soils: 25 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Tolovana Setting Landform: Mountain slopes, hillslopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Center third of mountainflank, lower third of mountainflank, side slope, head slope Down-slope shape: Convex, linear Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Colluvium and residuum derived from tuffaceous sedimentary rock Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-10 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Typical profile Oi - 0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant material A1 - 1 to 6 inches: medial silt loam A2 - 6 to 9 inches: medial silt loam A3 - 9 to 20 inches: medial silt loam 2Bw1 - 20 to 27 inches: silty clay loam 2Bw2 - 27 to 38 inches: silty clay loam 2Bw3 - 38 to 48 inches: paragravelly clay loam 2BC - 48 to 60 inches: very paragravelly clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 30 to 60 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 15.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/oxalis, swordfern-moist(902) Description of Templeton Setting Landform: Mountain slopes, hillslopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope, backslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Lower third of mountainflank, upper third of mountainflank, head slope, side slope Down-slope shape: Convex, linear Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Colluvium and residuum derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile Oi - 0 to 2 inches: slightly decomposed plant material A - 2 to 15 inches: medial silt loam Bw1 - 15 to 28 inches: silty clay loam Bw2 - 28 to 43 inches: silty clay loam Bw3 - 43 to 54 inches: silty clay loam Bw4 - 54 to 59 inches: paragravelly silty clay loam Cr - 59 to 69 inches: weathered bedrock Properties and qualities Slope: 30 to 60 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to paralithic bedrock Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 14.9 inches) Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-11 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/oxalis, swordfern-moist(902) 33D—Tolovana medial silt loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 12fqj Elevation: 50 to 1,800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 110 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 120 to 210 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Tolovana and similar soils: 85 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Tolovana Setting Landform: Hillslopes, mountain slopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope, footslope, summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase, mountaintop, base slope, interfluve Down-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex Across-slope shape: Linear, concave, convex Parent material: Colluvium and residuum derived from tuffaceous sedimentary rock Typical profile Oi - 0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant material A1 - 1 to 6 inches: medial silt loam A2 - 6 to 9 inches: medial silt loam A3 - 9 to 20 inches: medial silt loam 2Bw1 - 20 to 27 inches: silty clay loam 2Bw2 - 27 to 38 inches: silty clay loam 2Bw3 - 38 to 48 inches: paragravelly clay loam 2BC - 48 to 60 inches: very paragravelly clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 5 to 30 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 15.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903) Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-12 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT 45B—Hebo silty clay loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: sws1 Elevation: 20 to 300 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 300 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Hebo and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Hebo Setting Landform: Drainageways on fluviomarine terraces, depressions on stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, riser Down-slope shape: Concave, linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Mixed alluvium and/or fluviomarine deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 4 inches: silty clay loam BA - 4 to 10 inches: silty clay Bg1 - 10 to 18 inches: clay Bg2 - 18 to 26 inches: clay BCg - 26 to 35 inches: silty clay 2Cg - 35 to 60 inches: clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 5 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 to 4 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: Frequent Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w Hydrologic Soil Group: D Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA008OR) Minor Components Croquib Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces Other vegetative classification: Unnamed (G004AA008OR) Aquepts Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Drainageways on fluviomarine terraces Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-13 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT 56B—Wolfer medial silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 12fql Elevation: 20 to 250 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 260 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Wolfer and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Wolfer Setting Landform: Stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Silty alluvium overlying sandy and gravelly alluvium derived from igneous rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: medial silt loam A - 8 to 14 inches: medial silt loam AB - 14 to 22 inches: medial silt loam Bw - 22 to 35 inches: medial silty clay loam 2C - 35 to 60 inches: extremely gravelly loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 5 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 24 to 36 inches to strongly contrasting textural stratification Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 12.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/oxalis, swordfern-moist (902), Unnamed (G004AA004OR) Minor Components Hebo Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions on stream terraces Other vegetative classification: Unnamed (G004AA008OR) Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-14 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT 57B—Condorbridge gravelly medial loam, 0 to 7 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 12fqm Elevation: 20 to 200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 260 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Condorbridge and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Condorbridge Setting Landform: Alluvial fans Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear, concave Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium and/or debris flow deposits derived from igneous and sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 5 inches: gravelly medial loam A - 5 to 12 inches: gravelly medial loam BA - 12 to 26 inches: gravelly loam Bw1 - 26 to 35 inches: paragravelly clay loam Bw2 - 35 to 53 inches: paragravelly clay loam Bw3 - 53 to 60 inches: paragravelly clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 7 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 13.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA004OR) Minor Components Hebo Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions on stream terraces Other vegetative classification: Unnamed (G004AA008OR) Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-15 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT 57C—Condorbridge gravelly medial loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: sws2 Elevation: 20 to 800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 260 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Condorbridge and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Condorbridge Setting Landform: Alluvial fans Landform position (three-dimensional): Riser Down-slope shape: Concave, linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium and/or debris flow deposits derived from igneous and sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 5 inches: gravelly medial loam A - 5 to 12 inches: gravelly medial loam BA - 12 to 26 inches: gravelly loam Bw1 - 26 to 35 inches: paragravelly clay loam Bw2 - 35 to 53 inches: paragravelly clay loam Bw3 - 53 to 60 inches: paragravelly clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 3 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 13.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA004OR) Minor Components Aquepts Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions on alluvial fans Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-16 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT 58C—Knappa medial silt loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 27wg Elevation: 20 to 550 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 260 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Knappa and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Knappa Setting Landform: Stream terraces, fluviomarine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Riser, tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Mixed alluvium and/or fluviomarine deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 9 inches: medial silt loam A - 9 to 20 inches: silt loam Bw1 - 20 to 25 inches: silty clay loam Bw2 - 25 to 45 inches: silty clay loam Bw3 - 45 to 60 inches: silty clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 3 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 13.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA004OR) Minor Components Hebo Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions on fluviomarine terraces Other vegetative classification: Unnamed (G004AA008OR) Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-17 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT 74A—Nehalem silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 27z5 Elevation: 10 to 200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 260 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Nehalem, occasional flooding, and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 3 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Nehalem, Occasional Flooding Setting Landform: Flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 9 inches: silt loam A - 9 to 16 inches: silt loam Bw - 16 to 48 inches: silt loam BC - 48 to 60 inches: silt loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: Occasional Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: High (about 11.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2w Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA004OR) Minor Components Brenner Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: Depressions on flood plains Other vegetative classification: Unnamed (G004AA008OR) Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-18 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT 76A—Nestucca silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 27z7 Elevation: 10 to 200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 260 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Nestucca and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Nestucca Setting Landform: Flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 6 inches: silt loam A - 6 to 14 inches: silt loam Bw - 14 to 41 inches: silty clay loam C - 41 to 60 inches: silty clay Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 14 to 41 inches Frequency of flooding: Frequent Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: High (about 11.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3w Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA007OR) Minor Components Brenner Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions on flood plains Other vegetative classification: Unnamed (G004AA008OR) Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-19 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT 77A—Nestucca-Brenner silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 27wj Elevation: 10 to 200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 260 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Nestucca and similar soils: 55 percent Brenner and similar soils: 40 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Nestucca Setting Landform: Flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 6 inches: silt loam A - 6 to 14 inches: silt loam Bw - 14 to 41 inches: silty clay loam C - 41 to 60 inches: silty clay Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 14 to 41 inches Frequency of flooding: Frequent Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: High (about 11.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3w Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA007OR) Description of Brenner Setting Landform: Flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-20 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Typical profile Ap - 0 to 7 inches: silt loam A - 7 to 12 inches: silty clay loam Bw1 - 12 to 18 inches: silty clay loam Bw2 - 18 to 26 inches: silty clay loam BC - 26 to 40 inches: silty clay loam Cg1 - 40 to 55 inches: silty clay Cg2 - 55 to 60 inches: silty clay Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 to 7 inches Frequency of flooding: Frequent Frequency of ponding: Frequent Available water storage in profile: High (about 11.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA008OR) 80B—Quillamook medial silt loam, 0 to 7 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 27z8 Elevation: 20 to 200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 260 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Quillamook and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 3 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Quillamook Setting Landform: Stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Silty alluvium Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: medial silt loam A1 - 8 to 17 inches: medial silt loam A2 - 17 to 28 inches: medial silt loam Bw1 - 28 to 47 inches: medial silty clay loam Bw2 - 47 to 60 inches: medial silty clay loam Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-21 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 7 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 19.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA004OR) Minor Components Hebo Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: Depressions on stream terraces Other vegetative classification: Unnamed (G004AA008OR) 81B—Quillamook complex, 0 to 7 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 27z9 Elevation: 20 to 200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 260 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Quillamook, gravelly substratum, and similar soils: 60 percent Quillamook and similar soils: 25 percent Minor components: 2 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Quillamook, Gravelly Substratum Setting Landform: Stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Silty alluvium overlying sandy and gravelly alluvium derived from igneous rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 9 inches: medial silt loam A1 - 9 to 19 inches: medial silt loam A2 - 19 to 27 inches: medial silt loam Bw1 - 27 to 39 inches: medial silt loam Bw2 - 39 to 47 inches: medial silt loam 2C - 47 to 60 inches: extremely gravelly loamy coarse sand Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-22 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 7 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to strongly contrasting textural stratification Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 15.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA004OR) Description of Quillamook Setting Landform: Stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Silty alluvium Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: medial silt loam A1 - 8 to 17 inches: medial silt loam A2 - 17 to 28 inches: medial silt loam Bw1 - 28 to 47 inches: medial silty clay loam Bw2 - 47 to 60 inches: medial silty clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 7 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 19.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA004OR) Minor Components Hebo Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Depressions on stream terraces Other vegetative classification: Unnamed (G004AA008OR) Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-23 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT 89A—Udifluvents-Riverwash-Water complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2815 Elevation: 20 to 100 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 260 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Udifluvents and similar soils: 40 percent Riverwash: 30 percent Water: 25 percent Minor components: 5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Udifluvents Setting Landform: Flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock Typical profile A - 0 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam C1 - 7 to 38 inches: sandy loam C2 - 38 to 60 inches: loamy fine sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (1.98 to 19.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: Frequent Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w Hydrologic Soil Group: A Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/wet non-forest (991) Description of Riverwash Setting Landform: Flood plains Typical profile - 0 to 60 inches: stratified sand to gravel Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to water table: About 0 to 24 inches Frequency of flooding: Frequent Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-24 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8 Minor Components Fluvaquents Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions on flood plains 90A—Yachats very fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2816 Elevation: 10 to 200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 260 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Yachats and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Yachats Setting Landform: Flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 9 inches: very fine sandy loam A - 9 to 19 inches: loam C1 - 19 to 39 inches: fine sandy loam C2 - 39 to 54 inches: fine sandy loam C3 - 54 to 60 inches: very fine sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: Frequent Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3w Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA004OR) Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-25 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Minor Components Brenner Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions on flood plains Other vegetative classification: Unnamed (G004AA008OR) 94B—Ginger-Quillamook-Urban land complex, 0 to 7 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 12gz2 Elevation: 20 to 200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 260 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Ginger and similar soils: 35 percent Quillamook and similar soils: 30 percent Urban land: 30 percent Minor components: 2 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Ginger Setting Landform: Stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: medial silt loam A - 8 to 17 inches: medial silt loam 2BA - 17 to 20 inches: silty clay loam 2Bg1 - 20 to 28 inches: silty clay 2Bg2 - 28 to 38 inches: silty clay 2Bg3 - 38 to 52 inches: silty clay 3C - 52 to 60 inches: extremely gravelly sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 7 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to strongly contrasting textural stratification Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 17 to 20 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 12.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA007OR) Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-26 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Description of Urban Land Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8 Description of Quillamook Setting Landform: Stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Silty alluvium Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: medial silt loam A1 - 8 to 17 inches: medial silt loam A2 - 17 to 28 inches: medial silt loam Bw1 - 28 to 47 inches: medial silty clay loam Bw2 - 47 to 60 inches: medial silty clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 7 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 19.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA008OR) Minor Components Hebo Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Depressions on stream terraces Other vegetative classification: Unnamed (G004AA008OR) 173B—Tillamook-Ginger medial silt loams, 0 to 7 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 27zg Elevation: 20 to 200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 260 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-27 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Map Unit Composition Tillamook and similar soils: 45 percent Ginger and similar soils: 40 percent Minor components: 5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Tillamook Setting Landform: Stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: medial silt loam A1 - 8 to 20 inches: medial silt loam A2 - 20 to 25 inches: medial silt loam 2Bw1 - 25 to 35 inches: silty clay loam 2Bw2 - 35 to 52 inches: silty clay loam 2BC - 52 to 60 inches: silty clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 7 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 25 to 35 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 17.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA006OR) Description of Ginger Setting Landform: Stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: medial silt loam A - 8 to 17 inches: medial silt loam 2BA - 17 to 20 inches: silty clay loam 2Bg1 - 20 to 28 inches: silty clay 2Bg2 - 28 to 38 inches: silty clay 2Bg3 - 38 to 52 inches: silty clay 3C - 52 to 60 inches: extremely gravelly sandy loam Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-28 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 7 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to strongly contrasting textural stratification Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 17 to 20 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 12.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA007OR) Minor Components Hebo Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions on stream terraces Other vegetative classification: Unnamed (G004AA008OR) 173C—Tillamook-Ginger medial silt loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 12gzd Elevation: 20 to 200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 100 inches Mean annual air temperature: 49 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 260 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Tillamook and similar soils: 45 percent Ginger and similar soils: 40 percent Minor components: 5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Tillamook Setting Landform: Stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: medial silt loam A1 - 8 to 20 inches: medial silt loam A2 - 20 to 25 inches: medial silt loam 2Bw1 - 25 to 35 inches: silty clay loam 2Bw2 - 35 to 52 inches: silty clay loam 2BC - 52 to 60 inches: silty clay loam Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-29 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Properties and qualities Slope: 3 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 25 to 35 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 17.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA006OR) Description of Ginger Setting Landform: Stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: medial silt loam A - 8 to 17 inches: medial silt loam 2BA - 17 to 20 inches: silty clay loam 2Bg1 - 20 to 28 inches: silty clay 2Bg2 - 28 to 38 inches: silty clay 2Bg3 - 38 to 52 inches: silty clay 3C - 52 to 60 inches: extremely gravelly sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 3 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to strongly contrasting textural stratification Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 17 to 20 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 12.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA007OR) Minor Components Hebo Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions on stream terraces Other vegetative classification: Unnamed (G004AA008OR) Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-30 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT 183D—Winema-Fendall medial silt loams, 5 to 30 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: swsh Elevation: 50 to 500 feet Mean annual precipitation: 80 to 110 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 120 to 210 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Winema and similar soils: 55 percent Fendall and similar soils: 30 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Winema Setting Landform: Hillslopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope, summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, base slope Down-slope shape: Concave, linear Across-slope shape: Concave, linear Parent material: Colluvium and residuum derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 10 inches: medial silt loam A - 10 to 21 inches: medial silt loam 2BA - 21 to 28 inches: silty clay loam 2Bw - 28 to 42 inches: silty clay 2C - 42 to 60 inches: very paragravelly silty clay Properties and qualities Slope: 5 to 30 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 14.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA003OR) Description of Fendall Setting Landform: Hillslopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, nose slope, crest Down-slope shape: Linear, convex Across-slope shape: Linear, convex Parent material: Colluvium and residuum derived from sedimentary rock Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-31 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: medial silt loam A - 8 to 13 inches: silt loam Bw1 - 13 to 17 inches: silty clay loam Bw2 - 17 to 27 inches: paragravelly silty clay loam BC - 27 to 34 inches: very paragravelly silty clay loam 2Cr - 34 to 44 inches: weathered bedrock Properties and qualities Slope: 5 to 30 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Other vegetative classification: Sitka spruce/salmonberry-wet (903), Unnamed (G004AA003OR) Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Survey Area Data: Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Tillamook County, Oregon Version 5, Dec 4, 2013 Page 4-32 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT PREDICTED SOIL EROSION RUSLE2 Worksheet Erosion Calculation Record Info: Owner name Fairview Acres Dairy Tract # NA Field name B1-B4, B7 Location Soil T value, t/ac/yr Slope length (horiz), ft Avg. slope steepness, % Oregon\Tillamook County\OR_Tillamook_R80-90 74A Nehalem silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes\Nehalem silt loam 80% 5.0 900 3.0 Alternatives: Description Management Contouring Strips / barriers Erosion on Pasture a.Single Year/Single Crop Templates\Pasture, yr1 fall plant; manure appl., Z71 a. rows up-anddown hill (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin Cons. plan. soil loss (none) 1.5 Soil conditioning index (SCI) 0.90 STIR value Wind & irrigationinduced erosion for SCI, t/ac/yr Equiv. diesel use, gal/ac Energy use, BTU/ac Fuel cost, US$/ac 94.9 0 15 2000000 43.8 The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind, severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management description. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-33 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT RUSLE2 Worksheet Erosion Calculation Record Info: Owner name Fairview Acres Dairy Tract # NA Field name B5 Location Soil T value, t/ac/yr Slope length (horiz), ft Avg. slope steepness, % Oregon\Tillamook County\OR_Tillamook_R80-90 76A Nestucca silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes\Nestucca silt loam 90% 5.0 900 3.0 Alternatives: Description Management Contouring Strips / barriers Erosion on Pasture a.Single Year/Single Crop Templates\Pasture, yr1 fall plant; manure appl., Z71 a. rows up-anddown hill (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin Cons. plan. soil loss (none) 1.2 Soil conditioning index (SCI) 0.93 STIR value Wind & irrigationinduced erosion for SCI, t/ac/yr Equiv. diesel use, gal/ac Energy use, BTU/ac Fuel cost, US$/ac 94.9 0 15 2000000 43.8 The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind, severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management description. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-34 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT RUSLE2 Worksheet Erosion Calculation Record Info: Owner name Fairview Acres Dairy Tract # NA Field name B6 Location Soil T value, t/ac/yr Slope length (horiz), ft Avg. slope steepness, % Oregon\Tillamook County\OR_Tillamook_R80-90 80B Quillamook medial silt loam, 0 to 7 percent slopes\Quillamook medial silt loam 80% 5.0 800 7.0 Alternatives: Description Management Contouring Strips / barriers Erosion on Pasture a.Single Year/Single Crop Templates\Pasture, yr1 fall plant; manure appl., Z71 a. rows up-anddown hill (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin Cons. plan. soil loss (none) 3.9 Soil conditioning index (SCI) 0.71 STIR value Wind & irrigationinduced erosion for SCI, t/ac/yr Equiv. diesel use, gal/ac Energy use, BTU/ac Fuel cost, US$/ac 94.9 0 15 2000000 43.8 The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind, severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management description. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-35 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT RUSLE2 Worksheet Erosion Calculation Record Info: Owner name Fairview Acres Dairy Tract # NA Field name C1, H1 Location Soil T value, t/ac/yr Slope length (horiz), ft Avg. slope steepness, % Oregon\Tillamook County\OR_Tillamook_R80-90 80B Quillamook medial silt loam, 0 to 7 percent slopes\Quillamook medial silt loam 80% 5.0 800 7.0 Alternatives: Description Management Contouring Strips / barriers Erosion on Pasture a.Single Year/Single Crop Templates\Pasture, yr1 fall plant; manure appl., Z71 a. rows up-anddown hill (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin Cons. plan. soil loss (none) 3.9 Soil conditioning index (SCI) 0.71 STIR value Wind & irrigationinduced erosion for SCI, t/ac/yr Equiv. diesel use, gal/ac Energy use, BTU/ac Fuel cost, US$/ac 94.9 0 15 2000000 43.8 The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind, severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management description. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-36 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT RUSLE2 Worksheet Erosion Calculation Record Info: Owner name Fairview Acres Dairy Tract # NA Field name C4, C5 Location Soil T value, t/ac/yr Slope length (horiz), ft Avg. slope steepness, % Oregon\Tillamook County\OR_Tillamook_R80-90 45B Hebo silty clay loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes 5.0 900 5.0 Soil conditioning index (SCI) STIR value Wind & irrigationinduced erosion for SCI, t/ac/yr Equiv. diesel use, gal/ac Energy use, BTU/ac Fuel cost, US$/ac 1.1 94.9 0 18 2500000 54.7 Alternatives: Description Management Contouring Strips / barriers Erosion on Pasture a.Single Year/Single Crop Templates\Pasture, yr1 fall plant; manure appl., Z71 a. rows up-anddown hill (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin Cons. plan. soil loss (none) 2.6 The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind, severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management description. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-37 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT RUSLE2 Worksheet Erosion Calculation Record Info: Owner name Fairview Acres Dairy Tract # NA Field name F1W, F1E-F4, C1, C2, C6, D1, D2 Location Soil T value, t/ac/yr Slope length (horiz), ft Avg. slope steepness, % Oregon\Tillamook County\OR_Tillamook_R80-90 173B Tillamook-Ginger medial silt loams, 0 to 7 percent slopes\Tillamook medial silt loam 45% 5.0 800 7.0 Alternatives: Description Management Contouring Strips / barriers Erosion on Pasture a.Single Year/Single Crop Templates\Pasture, yr1 fall plant; manure appl., Z71 a. rows up-anddown hill (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin Cons. plan. soil loss (none) 4.2 Soil conditioning index (SCI) 0.69 STIR value Wind & irrigationinduced erosion for SCI, t/ac/yr Equiv. diesel use, gal/ac Energy use, BTU/ac Fuel cost, US$/ac 94.9 0 15 2000000 43.8 The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind, severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management description. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-38 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT RUSLE2 Worksheet Erosion Calculation Record Info: Owner name Fairview Acres Dairy Tract # NA Field name F5 Location Soil T value, t/ac/yr Slope length (horiz), ft Avg. slope steepness, % Oregon\Tillamook County\OR_Tillamook_R80-90 173C Tillamook-Ginger medial silt loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes\Tillamook medial silt loam 45% 5.0 800 7.0 Alternatives: Description Management Contouring Strips / barriers Erosion on Pasture a.Single Year/Single Crop Templates\Pasture, yr1 fall plant; manure appl., Z71 a. rows up-anddown hill (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin Cons. plan. soil loss (none) 4.2 Soil conditioning index (SCI) 0.69 STIR value Wind & irrigationinduced erosion for SCI, t/ac/yr Equiv. diesel use, gal/ac Energy use, BTU/ac Fuel cost, US$/ac 94.9 0 15 2000000 43.8 The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind, severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management description. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-39 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT RUSLE2 Worksheet Erosion Calculation Record Info: Owner name Fairview Acres Dairy Tract # NA Field name F6, F9 Location Soil T value, t/ac/yr Slope length (horiz), ft Avg. slope steepness, % Oregon\Tillamook County\OR_Tillamook_R80-90 183D Winema-Fendall medial silt loams, 5 to 30 percent slopes\Winema medial silt loam 55% 5.0 500 12 Alternatives: Description Management Contouring Strips / barriers Erosion on Pasture a.Single Year/Single Crop Templates\Pasture, yr1 fall plant; manure appl., Z71 a. rows up-anddown hill (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin Cons. plan. soil loss (none) 5.0 Soil conditioning index (SCI) 0.62 STIR value Wind & irrigationinduced erosion for SCI, t/ac/yr Equiv. diesel use, gal/ac Energy use, BTU/ac Fuel cost, US$/ac 94.9 0 15 2000000 43.8 The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind, severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management description. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-40 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT RUSLE2 Worksheet Erosion Calculation Record Info: Owner name Fairview Acres Dairy Tract # NA Field name L1 Location Soil T value, t/ac/yr Slope length (horiz), ft Avg. slope steepness, % Oregon\Tillamook County\OR_Tillamook_R80-90 77A Nestucca-Brenner silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes\Nestucca silt loam 55% 5.0 900 3.0 Alternatives: Description Management Contouring Strips / barriers Erosion on Pasture a.Single Year/Single Crop Templates\Pasture, yr1 fall plant; manure appl., Z71 a. rows up-anddown hill (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin Cons. plan. soil loss (none) 1.2 Soil conditioning index (SCI) 0.93 STIR value Wind & irrigationinduced erosion for SCI, t/ac/yr Equiv. diesel use, gal/ac Energy use, BTU/ac Fuel cost, US$/ac 94.9 0 15 2000000 43.8 The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind, severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management description. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-41 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT RUSLE2 Worksheet Erosion Calculation Record Info: Owner name Fairview Acres Dairy Tract # NA Field name L2, L3 Location Soil T value, t/ac/yr Slope length (horiz), ft Avg. slope steepness, % Oregon\Tillamook County\OR_Tillamook_R80-90 81B Quillamook complex, 0 to 7 percent slopes\Quillamook medial silt loam 60% 4.0 800 7.0 Alternatives: Description Management Contouring Strips / barriers Erosion on Pasture a.Single Year/Single Crop Templates\Pasture, yr1 fall plant; manure appl., Z71 a. rows up-anddown hill (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin Cons. plan. soil loss (none) 4.1 Soil conditioning index (SCI) 0.69 STIR value Wind & irrigationinduced erosion for SCI, t/ac/yr Equiv. diesel use, gal/ac Energy use, BTU/ac Fuel cost, US$/ac 94.9 0 15 2000000 43.8 The SCI is the Soil Conditioning Index rating. If the calculated index is a negative value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to decline under that production system. If the index is a positive value, soil organic matter levels are predicted to increase under that system. The STIR value is the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating. It utilizes the speed, depth, surface disturbance percent and tillage type parameters to calculate a tillage intensity rating for the system used in growing a crop or a rotation. STIR ratings tend to show the differences in the degree of soil disturbance between systems. The kind, severity and number of ground disturbing passes are evaluated for the entire cropping rotation as shown in the management description. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-42 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT OREGON PHOSPHORUS INDEX (WEST) Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-43 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT FIELD El WE STERN OREGON INDEK Enter date in gay cell-5 and select bat dreice frem :iep- dawn menus. Cells- with blue fEll'l't canleted eutm?eelly'. Field Acre-5 Sail Builtest date Elreyr 1 Acetate Hi {ppml pH 5MP TRANSPORT FACTORS Sheet 3. ri erze-ien Here-hey:- krig etie-n erzeie-n Hens-He Flunei'f Bless- Fleeding Frequency Distancete-starn Eluflers Drainage SCIU REE Banner-aim P2135 rate Enmrner-zriel PEE-rne?-red Emrnerdel FEE-timing Cir-genie P335 rete :Ibe?e Er-genie PEDE- metth Cir-genie FEE-timing SIDHE HUHCIIFF HI SH RAT IHE UM MEHT 5 Grammar: .lmicathn Plan tgr: Date: Section 4 Fa Bat-:4: Farr. Egir??ig - . helix-:5 Eli El?- 7".1 ..F1 5U I 13.3 23.3 1 N-Jl'u'r-Il'u T-IF- E'll' H-e-Iml-Im BEE. Cu- .r'r'olz'r 323331322335 3:13:52" 13.2335 Cr. 33322.2312 :2 33322.2312 3:13:55? 3.233? 3'5 3'5 27 if -3 3&3 3&3 55-: 1253 3L1 1.35; .1 "ii "2.3 5.3 2.3 5.3 "2'rl:f rI:- 'Illi I'll 'Illi cw lc-w Icw Ic-w Icw low rr-cr'e cease-ice Ell cmsicr'el cozasicrr'el seasicrel cozasic-r'el rrcr?e coma 5ic-r'el '5 in?? 10.1 I: #11533 3-500 ll . I . .I hill-:rpm: 5:2 - ll: rpm: :21! - II.I l NRCS- I :l 4m Vi". 'll'mph-:1 I II ?q'm'r his-ru- um: --cl "lm'r- m::plu-:i 123' 123' 123' 123' 123' 123' 123' CI ?in! i .1.th In 'l :E?xrx ?1 In Hill 13::1 :Hl.l'r'H. 'l . I . .I pay-LI. blu A All pun. hgl?uu 15.3 1 52 15.2 1 2.3 15.3 1 5.5 15.3 HeciL. n' n' i-.-leciL.n' Lew Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4?44 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT FIE LE1 EUWRY BI VIE STERN INDEE Grammar: Ami-Eatim Plan tgr: Egii?riig Enter data in gay cell-5 and 5513:: bat maiCEf'rn-m :knp- dawn Date: 1'3: 3'3 1 CEME- with blue furlt can-lEtEd autm? c3115.: F1-E1E1 L1 L2 13 Acre-5 17.3 3'3 ?55 317-1. h?I-Itlnzu t-1l'l Sniltest date 332' 33.231? 3:13:53 33.2313 :5 33322.22?: Elrayr 1 F"{ppn11 3'3 Acetate H. {pme 33:: 33:: 1.53: pH 6.1 5.3 5.3 5.3 THAN SPURT FACTORS '11 -1 -1 Ir 1r krhminn 35in? GET-I 'Ill 'rl:f rI:- 'Illi :1 I I Hunnf'f 31355 Icw PCPE PCPE P-C-PE PCPE Fla-wing Frequa'lqr PCPE PCPE PCPE PCPE PCPE Star? a 1" 100 2-): 269 II: a ?03 ~53EUHEE -- Inn-n: (Ir mac-2.1m.- I: n- Iru'n: 5:1 ?l - II: Ipu-t :11! MICE - II Ipu-r I . I DrainBEE an I'n cull". n9 I-n ::lm rum-I EDU REE FACTORS Cranmer-2:151 P335 ratE Emmdal PEP, mEmzd ?u'nl'c- hzm- ?I?l'r 3::pln-n Nor-:- Hzm- . LI II I "mill-(1 CTQE nil: PEDE- Elba-'3 I31 123' 123' 123Hum: I I ?gs nil: ly?ul} LI bll} A HUI-IL ?gum-0:; Hum: EDRE 15-2 15.1 ELCI RUHDFF RI SH RAT IHE 1-.-leciL.n' Mecim' f-.-1eciL. n' Law Law Law UM MEI-1T 5 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4?45 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT FIE E. WE STERN OREGON INDEK Enter data in gay cells and select bat Che-ice hem :kap- dawn menus. Cells- w'rth blue fant cm'pIeted autama? calh-z Field Acre-e Sail Snilteet date Bray 1 P{ppm I Acetate pH 5MP FACTORS Sheet erzeian Here-any} trig atien erzeien Hunef'f Class- Fleeding Frequenq,? Distaneeteeteam Elu?ere Drainage SCIU REE FACTORS Cm?lrna'eial P335 rate Emmdal P335 med-led Bm?lrna'eial P335tin1in-g Cir-game P335 rate :I'ea?a CI-ganie P335 n'rethed Cir-game P335tin1ing EDRE RUHDFF RI RAT IHE UM MEHT 3 Section 4 33:31-72:21. H- .4 . -. 5.1a.- Egie?tieg Tave?'Pe: 1-3. 3-31: 31 3: .33 35 35? 13.5 33.3 53.1 3.3 3.1 7.3 c'i-JI] 13L 3? l3 13311- ?33 I-[3l3 7 3.33:: 33.2313 3:13:53 33.2313 3.333212312 3: 33323231?- Cece-52.2312 .5 35 If; g" . LL 5-33 333 35 L37 L37 53-? 5.5? 5.3 5i 5.3 5.2 5.5? 5i En'rl:1 rI:- 'Illi I'll luv-:11 'Illi 1' 7 law Iew Iew n'uee iL.n' n' eeiL. n' Iew PEPE r' EFE r' EFE PEPE PEPE '3 1333 1'33 I333 1'33 I33 333 3'3'3 ?'33'3 5 3-333 llII: P113135 :21! or b13155 - I . I 'm I'n cull". 1' I-n nezulu-a 1' Hi I ::"-inl'c' h:1'll' Hf. '7 N?l'l?ulilp'c'll h?l'll' I .l HCI Nl'iltl'J?zl'i'r? run-Hum: . I .I I Menu-1m: He'll} Hun 3::pl'm: epp't-i: 7.3 3.3 7.3 5.5 5.5 7.3 3.3 3.3 Lew Lew Lew Lew Lew Lew Lew Lew Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4?46 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT FIELD En WE STERN OREGON INDEX Grammar: .imicatim P1311 tgr: Date: Section 4 FE 13:21:35: Farr: I .: Egii?ri: ingay'EEII-s ands-Elect bat menus. w'rth fant autm? Field :1 :2 -I1 7" 3' 17.3 Eff 1.7311- 31' ES DI. datE Ema-53.2337 3:13:52" 3.3312 SEES-F 3.3337 Bray 1 23' If 33 Acetate l-i {ppm} E21 53-? ?51 pH 5.: 5.: EMF 5.: EA: THAN SPURT 1' 1' '1 1' '1 1' ir'? min? 35in? ?$1535 rI:- 'Il:i ::rll:l II Hun EH Class- EPE PE-PE PEPE PE-PE PEPE Handing Frequa'lq PEPE PEPE PEPE PEPE PE-PE PEPE PE-PE PEPE mam-lit: Star? an:- 299 ?l 50.1 ~53? ?l 1' wit-J I: ~53: 1' >503 ll. 1* I I I -- FIR-CEII: Ipu-t :21! or - II PIECE. Iprr I I I DrainagE 'm I'n cull". rm I'n I ::lm SCIU HE FACT CH 5 Emmercial PEDE"-inl'c' NF. N?l't? hl'd N?l'l?ulilp'c'll h?l'll' . LI jl PEEtil-nin? .ul'vl: "min-d up- :Eu-rl Cl-ga nil: P335 rEltE 1:3 1:3 :l :l :l Erna nilHum: A ly?uh- LI pun.- A L- Hui-I, r I_ hen] Hum: gpp'il? Cit-gs nil: FEE-timing SCORE 15.2 15-12 HUI-JEFF MEHT 5 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4?47 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4?48 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Oregon Phosphorus Index Risk Interpretation Interpretation Recommended Nutrient Limitation Low potential for P movement from this site given current management practices and site characteristics. There is a low probability of an adverse impact to surface waters from P losses on this site. Soil test P and P losses are likely to increase in future due to Nbased nutrient management from animal manure. Nitrogen Medium potential for P movement from this site given current management practices and site characteristics. Practices should be introduced to reduce P losses by surface runoff, subsurface flow, and erosion. Soil test P and P losses are likely to increase in future due to Nbased nutrient management from animal manure. Nitrogen High potential for P movement from this site given current management practices and site characteristics. All practicable management practices to reduce P losses through surface runoff, subsurface flow, or erosion should be implemented. Phosphorus Very high potential for P movement from this site given current management practices and site characteristics. Active remediation techniques should be implemented in an effort to reduce the P loss potential from this site. No manure P Index rating West PI Score<13 East PI Score<30 West PI Score 13-25 East PI Score 30-100 West PI Score >25-50 East PI Score >100-400 West PI Score >50 East PI Score >400 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4-49 Section 4 SOIL AND RISK ASSESSMENT Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 4?50 Section 5 REFERENCES OREGON DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE MODIFICATION OF ANIMAL NUMBERS National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES PERMIT) Statutory Authority Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 468B.050 When permit required ORS 468B.210 Maximum numbers of animals based on ability to contain, treat, hold and dispose of wastes as necessary to comply with all conditions of the permit. A. General Information Master Address #AG-P0063328CAFG #AG-P0149950CAFG #AG-P0066471CAFG #AG-P0177584CAFG EPA#ORG010088 EPA#ORG010087 EPA#ORG010089 EPA#ORG010090 Name or Business Name – Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Facility Location Address – 7615 Trask River Road City – Tillamook Zip Code - 97141 County - Tillamook B. Livestock Type: Circle the item that best represents your operation. 1. Beef Feedlot (Fattening) 2. Beef Cattle (Cow/calf) 5. Dairy Farm, Heifer Replacement Farm 7. Mink/Rabbits 3. Hogs 6. Poultry/Broiler 8. Horses and Other Equine 4. Sheep and Goats 7. Poultry/Eggs 9. Other C. Current Permitted Animal Numbers: In the space below please describe your number of animals by herd composition or class. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm is a Large Concentrated, Medium Confined and Small Confined CAFO currently permitted for 1,924 dairy animals- 1,238 Milking and Dry Cows and 686 Heifers and Calves. D. Current Permitted CAFO Designation: Circle one. See reverse side for table. Large Concentrated Medium Concentrated Medium Confined Small Confined Small Concentrated E. Proposed change in permitted animal numbers: In the space below please describe your proposed animal numbers by herd composition Large Federal CAFOor class. Medium Federal CAFO State CAFO Fairview Acres Dairy Farm is requesting to combine all current permits into one and be permitted for 1,924 dairy animals- 1,238 Milking and Dry Cows and 686 Heifers and Calves. F. New CAFO Designation based on increase / decrease in animal numbers. Circle one. See reverse side for table. Large Concentrated Medium Concentrated Medium Confined Small Confined Small Concentrated G. Certification: I understand that an approved animal waste management plan is required prior to permit increase. I agree to prepare and implement an animal waste management plan in accordance with the requirements and timelines specified in the permit. Signature (operator or owner) Date Print Name Signature (operator or owner Date Print Name Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5-1 Section 5 REFERENCES Definition of Legally Authorized Representative: See 40 CFR 122.22 for more detail. Please also provide the information requested in brackets [ ]  Corporation — President, secretary, treasurer, vice-president, or any person who performs principal business functions; or a manager of one or more facilities      employing more than 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding $25 million that is authorized in accordance to corporate procedure to sign such documents Partnership — General partner [list of general partners, their addresses, and telephone numbers] Sole Proprietorship — Owner(s) [each owner must sign the application] City, County, State, Federal, or other Public Facility — Principal executive officer or ranking elected official Limited Liability Company — Member [articles of organization] Trusts — Acting trustee [list of trustees, their addresses, and telephone numbers] SEND THIS FORM TO: A. Oregon Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Division 635 Capitol Street NE Salem, Oregon 97301-2532 ANIMAL MODIFICATION REQUEST INSTRUCTIONS GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Enter the legal name. 2. Enter the common name of the facility or operation, if different than the legal name. 3. Enter the facility's physical address (physical location), including city, state, zip code and telephone number. B. C. D. E. F. G. CIRCLE THE APPROPRIATE LIVESTOCK TYPE OF YOUR OPERATION. Self-explanatory Self-explanatory Describe your proposed animal increase by herd composition or class Self-explanatory Signature CAFO Designation by Size Threshold (used for items D and F) Confined Concentrated Confines more than one animal for more than Stabled or confined and fed or maintained for total of 45 days or more in any 124 months on prepared surface month period Crops, vegetation, forage growth, or post-harvest residues not sustained in normal growing season in lot or facility Small Confined Medium Confined Small Concentrated Medium Concentrated Large Concentrated Waste water Waste water control Significant contributor of Discharging pollutants [40 CFR control facility facility or pollutants to waters to waters of the U.S. §122.23(b)(4)] or disposal disposal system of the U.S. [40 CFR §122.23(b)(6)] system for wet for wet or dry wastes Designated by director wastes [40CFR §122.23(b)(9)] Animal sector Small Confined Medium Confined Small Concentrated Medium Concentrated Large Concentrated Mature dairy cows1 <200 200-699 <200 200-699 ≥700 Veal calves <300 300-999 <300 300-999 ≥1,000 Cattle2 <300 300-999 <300 300-999 ≥1,000 Swine> 55 lbs <750 750-2,499 <750 750-2,499 ≥2,500 Swine < 55 lbs <3,000 3,000-9,999 <3,000 3,000-9,999 ≥10,000 Horses <150 150-499 <150 150-499 ≥500 Sheep or lambs <3,000 3,000-9,999 <3,000 3,000-9,999 ≥10,000 Turkeys Chickens, including laying hens or broilers w/wet waste system manure handling system) <16,500 <9,000 16,500-54,999 9,000-29,999 <16,500 <9,000 16,500-54,999 9,000-29,999 ≥55,000 ≥30,000 Laying hens w/dry waste system NA 25,000-81,999 <25,000 25,000-81,999 ≥82,000 Broiler chickens w/dry waste system NA 37,500-124,999 <37,500 37,500-124,999 ≥125,000 Ducks w/other than wet waste system <10,000 10,000-29,999 <10,000 10,000-29,999 ≥30,000 Ducks w/wet waste system <1,500 1,500-4,999 <1,500 1,500-4,999 ≥5,000 Designated by director. NA NA Other animal type As determined by ODA.3 1 Whether milked or dry. 2 Other than mature dairy cows or veal calves; cattle includes but is not limited to heifers, steers, bulls and cow/calf pairs. 3 To determine the number of animals that require permit coverage, ODA will compare the operation to the most similar animal type in the table. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5-2 Section 5 REFERENCES Notice of Registration and Oregon Con?ned Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) National Pollntant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit Summary Overview of CAFO General Permit Summary COPY Mutual Permit In 3 For Qnestlonal Additional Information General Permit Conditions Prohibited Discharges See permit section 82, p. 9 I0 for hill tern. When Discharge ls Allowed Permit sections 82.8, p. 9; SZ.C, pp. 9 lO. P.1d2. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP The Oregon General Permit No. l-2009 (permit) was issued by the Oregon Deputment of Agriculture (ODA) and Department of Environmental Quality (DBQ) aid became effective on June 29. M9. The permit expires on May 31, 2014. A copy of the permit is enclosed. 11ris Notice of Registration describes your speci?c permit registration information and an overview of permit requirements. Your permit registration was renewed to Permit No. l-2009 on October S, 2009. based on information provided by you as follows: Master No. EPA In?ation No. oncoreoss Operator Lemivner, if different Name RICHARD Business Name FAIRVIEW ACRES DAIRY FARM Malling Address 76l5 TRASK RIVER RD TILLAMOOK, 0R 97l4l Facility Address 7615 TRASK RIVER RD TILLAMOOK. 0R 97l4l Phone Cell 503/80l/323] Fax 503184210457 Mail Address Maxim run The maximum number of mimals that may be held at this dairy is 900 animals. Number of based on the following population: 800 talking and dry cows and too heifers and calves. Ani-als without ?rst providing ODA with a revised Animal Wale Management Plan (AWMP) aid rece?ig written ODA approval. Facility Based on the type and size of your Operation, ODA has determined that you operate a Classi?cation Large Concentrated CAFO. Note: Luge Commed CAFO: lune additional requirements. Please ?metal permit. Each ?scal year. you will be maesscd an annual compliance fee of $25.00 to maintain your registration under this general permit. If you have questions, call your rogional livestock water quality specialist for Area I at (503) ?2-6278 or the Salem of?ce at (503) 986-4699. Additional CAFO program information is availdile on the internet at Theoperatormustbe'meomplimee permit)atalltimcs. The following types of discharges are prohibited: Contaminated con?nement or waste accumulation areas; Overflow or discharges from waste storage facilities; Discharges due to improper land application activities from surface or ?eld tile outlets: Discharges due to equipment failure; and Leakage or seepage from facilities in the production area in excess of approved designs. Won/tree.- Dischuges ofprocesswaste waterto surfacewatcrs ofthe except: - When rainfall events came an over?ow ofprocess waste water from a facility designed, constructed, operated. and maintained to contain all process-generated waste waters the runoff and direct precipitation ?our a 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event provided these discharges do not cause or contribtne to a violation of state water quality standards; or 0 In the even of an upset or bypass condition. 77am: conditions de?ned in the permit. All authorized disdiarges horn the production area must be properly land applied or otherwise handled in a way that minimizes impacts on mrfaee water and groundwater sources. mm Page 5-3 Mimll?Wu-le Ml?l??ll?l Equinmmt Hui-n11 33, pp. 1245- Sims: Enquiremm P?l'l'l'lil median 51E, ll}. Milton-ins, Reporting Pumilap?inn 54. pp. Ill-15L LIIHI Hm: Fumitstc?unn 515: PP- 9' 31C. p. 11 13. puny In "pump-[hm Hamil sanction 54.9.1. p- 13. mull Ram I?m-mil section 51.0.1. p. Ill- Clm?rllc?nn of H'th and. Waste Water Padilla Permit sac-lion 5215.141 ll}. 11-1111: much; a. Famine-Gian Elli. pp. 1' 3. Section 5 REFERENCES Mim?m?nndm: Sumn?aIHIunD?'?amth: i5. allnwed in mmpliam: will-[ha DIM- mm?muhumnemh A1:th MAM-IF mempmn?musadat?m 11m anmtium. MAW must re?autpmdun?nnmutieu m?b: Yunmu?pmidp Ipplimtiun mun I3an during pniuda when mil ?gullible. Monitoring. Wing-minpm?ngufmapplim :ppmud and mqulremen? in af?'mparmm?me: 1mg: mmed?l?'?shmuai?la?drequirm. Yul: mm. hmmwim proper Wale mmimBM?minimizewm pallutim. muslin-a quanti?able. and based nrnha HESS Phosphor-nus Why-am Tachniuaan-te #26, land mplim?nn Mispmhibi?d. Hull's: Hyena-time: within}! limp-3'an m.Pf?? WWh?a?mm??ij Wm. l?lh ufuuhyear. adv-Inca and p?urtnm?ruu?m by am 0R5 3411-051 and Certi?ca?nn ?xmnh'umilahlc?m??h. Ray Idndl?ltdminimtur Hm Em Division P311 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP mm Page 5?4 Section 5 REFERENCES Notice of Registration and Oregon Con?ned Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit Summary Overview of CAFO General Permit Summary FILE COPY Annual Permit Fee For Quationsl Additional Information General Permit Conditions Prohibited Discharges See permit section S2. p. 9& l0 for mu text. When Discharge is Allowed Permit sections 82.8, p. 9; SZ.CI pp. 9 l0. Eld'Z. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP The Oregon CAFO Gateral Permit No. 1-2009 (permit) was issued by the Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA) and Department of Envimnmernnl Quality (DEQ) and became effective on June 29, 2009. The permit expires on May 31, 2014. A copy ofthe permit is enclosed. This Notice ofRegistration describes your speci?c permit registration information and an overview of permit requirements. Your permit registration was renewed to Permit No. I-2009 on October 5, 2009, based on information provided by you as follows: Master Address No. AG-POMMOCAFG EPLRegist?ration No. 0R60l0087 Operator miner. if different Name RICHARD OBRIST Business Name FAIRVIEW BOHREN FARM Mailing Address 76l5 TRASK RIVER RD 0R 97l4l Facility Address 440 WILSON RIVER LOOP RD TILLAMOOK. OR 97l4l Phone Cell 503/80l/323l Fax 503/842/0457 E-mall Address Maximum The maximum number of animals that may be held at this dairy is 275 animals, Number of based on the following population: 250 milking and dry cows and 25 letters and calves. Animals You may not exceed this number by more than or 25 an'nnals. whichever is . without first providing ODA with a revised Animal Waste Mmagement (AWMP) and receiving written ODA approval. Facility Medium Con?ned CAIO. Note: Large Concentrated CAFOs have addition! "murmurs. Please mm! permit Each fiscal year, you will be assessed an armual compliance fee of $25.00 to maintain your registration under this general permit. If you have questions. call your regional livestock water quality specialist fer Area I at (503) 842-6278 or the Salem of?ce at (503) 986-4699. Additional CAFO program in?xmation is available on the internet a Theoperatormust be conditions ofthe permit)atall times. The following types of discharges are prohibited: Contaminated runoff from con?nement or waste accumulation areas; Over?ow or discharges from waste storage facilities; Discharges due to improper land application activities from surface drama or ?eld tile outlets; Discharges due to equipment failue; and Leakageoraeepaget'rom facilities in the production areainexcess ofappnoved designs. madam ofprocess wastewaterto surface waters ofthe strict-exonera?y prohibited except: - When rainfall events cause an over?ow ofprocess waste wuer from a facility designed. constructed. precipitation from a 25-year. 244mm rainfall event provided these discharges do not cause or contribute to a violnion of state water quality standards; or 0 ln theevent ofan These conditions All authorized discharges from theproducticn area must be properly land applied handled in away that minimizes impacts on surface water and groundwater sources. Page 5-5 Section 5 REFERENCES MWMM Animal Wm: Thepannitrequim?muaadlpmi?td apam?nn MAW mumer Emulmnt ?[1151!me mun: Emu-Ital}- herding-duke,de Permit simian 53, Wigwam pun-inn um: altha livestock open-Ilium 'I'h-a AWMP must pm?mand I1: pp. 11-15. imphemmd mum-dingy. Stung: mum-s manly sail and wea?m?mndi?uns an suihhle. Permit marina 51E, p. 10. Monitoring. Illuminating. mum-dim:ng Ind rcpur?n; aim-ash: Ipplicalium. and Wmuimmh mun new?: EDA. and requir?ll?lta Emamf?m pemih?m: Lug: lupin-mg mew-enema. Pmitsa?inn 54,131. 16?19. mi?mhg Wm: anil madam lpplica?nm mun unnamed thy: capacity suilmd maps to mimilm: nuriml: and minimize watm' Pm?l??nm: Hdeerwynundn-?u inm?WMP. Land applica?m nuw?'iapmhihit?d. [htth mull-nu Nan: {hum-ea Pumitsw?nn within-1H MILL p. 13. ham-s gain m. MIMmI?a?mku?rq-m?wimw??m Amull?apnrt Pum?au?inn Ednlm. Wand Walt 5mg: fan??ias migrant with mehm?ewmdmudi?ad Wanna nuqute'Water Cut-ulFl?i?u Btperinm?larunprum Fnralln?u' Pumitsac?nn Car??u?mfm?umn?hhlu?m??h. 51.13.1910. Public Na?nlng Fri-um: app-wing new pmnil cow ramming permit cum-Ian. mappmvi?pmpuwd mhmtinl champs Plr?dpa?-In In DEA will pru'i'id-? amine pm'tinipl?un. Pm simian 311:, pp. 1 a: a. - Ray Ham-a] Baum Diminn P.1dr1. I Fat-mm Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5?6 Section 5 REFERENCES Notice of Registration and Oregon Confined Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit Summary Overview of CAFO General Permit Summary COPY Annual Permit Fee For Questions] Additional Information General Permit Conditions Prohibited Discharges See permit section 52. p. 9 a 10 for full text. When Discharge is Allowed Permit sections 82.8, p. 9; S2.C. pp. 9 10. P.ld2. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP The Oregon CAFO General Permit No. 1-2009 (permit) was issued by the Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA) and Department of Environmental Quality (BBQ) and became effective on Jnne 29, 2009. The permit expires on May 20?. A copy of the permit is enclosed. This Notice of Registration describes your speci?c permit registration information and an overview of permit requirements. Your permit registration was renewed to CAFO Permit No. 1-2009, mid modified on October 5, 2009. based on information provided by you as follows: Master Address No. EPA Registration No. 0R60l0089 Operator Myrna, if different Narne RICHARD OBRIST Business Name FAIRWEW ACRES LITTLE DAIRY Mailing Address 7615 TRASK RIVER RD TILLAMOOK, OR 97l4l Facility Address I375 OLSON RD TILLAMOOK. OR 97 Ml Phone Cell 503/80l/323l Fax 50318421045? B-rnail Address Maximum The maximum number ofanimals that may be held at this dairy CAFO is 296 animals, Nnmber of based on the following populmioo: 165 miling and dry cows and 13] heifers and calves. Animals You may not exceed this number by more than l0% or 25 animals, whichever is greater. without first providing ODA with a revised Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) and receiving written ODA approval. Facility Classi?cation Small Confined CAFO. Note: Large Canto-Wed haw Miriam] requirements. Please see general permit. Each ?scal year, you will be amassed an annual compliance fee of $25.00 to maintain your registration under this general permit. If you have questions, call your regional livestock water quality specialist for Area I at (503) 842-6278 or the Salem of?ce at (515)986-4699. Additional CAFO program informmion is available on the internet at I The operator must be in complimce with all terms and conditions of the permit (not only this surnmuy of the permit) at all times. The following types of discharges are prohibiteck Contarn'ntated runoff from confinement or waste accumulation m; Over?ow or discharges from waste storage facilities; Discharges due to improper land amlimtim activities from surface drainagcc or ?eld tile outlets; due to equipment failure; and leakage or seepage ?'om facilities in the production area in excess of approved designs. prohibited - When rainfall events cause an overflow of process wmte water ?om a facility designed, oonstmeted, precipitation from a 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event provided these discharges do not mac or contribute to a violation of state water quality standards; or in the event of an upset or bypass condition. These conditions are further defined in the permit. All authorized discharges from the production tea must be properly land qrplied or otherwise handled in a way that minimizes impacts on surface water and groundwater-sources. mm Page 5-7 Minn! WISH: Went Han [aim Raq?lnt Pannit swim 53-. pp. 1315. Emma: annlreml Permit a?c?un 51E, Manual-ins, Ramrdketpinl .E Heparin: Pennit Man 54, PP Land hpplicalinn Rim IE-Timjn: Permitiaclinna 525.119. 9 IE 31E. 11 Jr. I3. nut: tn Rap-m1 Nmm?ilnw Pumi't Hall?nu 54111,]1. ll. hull-II lupus-I Famine-dim ably. 13. Construct!? at Walt: Elm-lg: all Waste Water Curr-1W? Pmnitsnc?nn 523.2, p. HI. Public Hn?nlng a: Participl??u-n Permitmc??n SLR, pp. dz. 5. Section 5 REFERENCES Lani Area.- water rum-?" 1h: land is lint mid?eld apt-Inhibited is allml'ud it?d]: land. is b-cil?lgnmag?d in 1Willi 'li'le AWMP by DIM. An AW pamitmn?i?mu and mquitths, mam-Mu:me manure Hangmhardf?udtmand current used Itle livestock aparatiun. mam mush-mat: - Tun must lat-mid: Mammal ma mil} formlid and liquid ?In 1:11 tins: an lint land applim?un um only sail and 11-min: mndilinm u: suitabln. Mmilnring, murdkaeping mt] repm-?ng wan?: applications. Ind must was. described in In AW appumihy (IDA and requirement: in marlin-n 3.4. ?f?'llp?'l'l'lil. Hm: Large comma-mud ?-lF?s lama: requiem; agriculnu'al pu'l?jcasand?spaci?ad Wm Phuaphmuh?m?gmm?ym?m #215. ispruhlbited. mm?'ispml??m Nate: Emma with-En 2d ham-a: am ur Wt} Fragrmsuppmm?mm??J WP. lithofnuhyur. facilities arm facili??mustb?lppm?din admit-DH." to an provide publium?ca and pu?cipa?un. by lindl. ?ninMr Nani-ll Em Diwis'mn F.1d; Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP ?ll-I'm Page 5?8 Section 5 REFE RENCE Notice of Registration and Oregon Con?ned Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit Summary Overview of CAFO General Permit Summary COPY Annual Permit Fee For Questions! Additional Information General Permit Conditions Prohibited Discharges See permit section 82, p. 9&10 for full text. When Discharge is Allowed Permit sections 82.8, p. 9; SZ.C, pp. 9 lO. P.ld?2. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP The Oregon General Permit No. l~2009 (permit) wm issued by the Oregon Deputment of Agriculture (ODA) Department of Envirortmattal Quality (DEQ) and became effective on Jane 29. 2009. The permit expires on May 2014. A copy of the permit is enclosed. This Notice of Registration describes your speci?c permit registration information and an overview of permit requirements. Your permit registration was renewed to CAFO Permit No. 1-2009 on October 5, 2009, based on information provided by you as follows: Master Address No. AG-P0177584CAFG RPM-anon No. oncorooao Operator Legal owner, if different Name RICHARD Business Name CHAD ACRES Mailing Address 76I5 TRASK RIVER RD TILLAMOOK. 0R 97l41 Facility Address 7765 FAIRVIEW RD TILLAMOOK. OR 9714! Phone Main SOWZIZEDO Mobile 5031801022? Fax 503/842/0457 E-mail Address Maximum The maximum number of animals that may be held at this dairy heifer CAFO is 453 Number of animals. based on the following population: 23 dry cows and 430 heifers and calves. You Animals may not exceed this number by more than or 25 animals. whichever is greater, without ?rst providing ODA with a revised Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) and receivingwritten ODA approval. Facility Based on the type and size of your operrnion, ODA has determined that you operate a Clari?cation Medium Con?ned CAFO. Note: Large CWWEJ 001% have additional requirements. Please ?mere! permit. Each fiscal year. you will be assessed an annrtal compliance fee of $25.00 to maintain your registration under this general permit. If you have questions. all your regional livestock water quality specialist for Area I at (503) 842-6278 or the Salem oilicc at (503) 986-4699. Additional CAFO program information is available on the internet at hit I fr The operator must be in complimce with all terms and conditions of the permit (not only this summa'y of the permit) at all times. The following types of d'echarges are prohibited: Contam'mated narotf from con?nement or waste accumulation areas; Over?ow or discharges from waste storage facilities; Discharges due to improper land application activities from surface drainges or ?eld tile outlets; Dbchargcs due to erpripmart failure; aid Leakage or seepage from facilities in the production area in excess of approved designs. Production Area: Diselwges ofprocens waste water to surface waters ofthe state are generally prohibited except: - When rainfall events cause an over?ow ofprocess waste water from a facility designed. oomtructed. operated. and precipitation Born a 25-yeu. 24-hour rainfall evern provided tirese dischages do not curse or contribute to a violation of state water quality stand-ds; or 0 in the event of an upset or bypass condition. These conditions are/ink? de?ned in the permit. All authorized discharges from the production sea must be properly land applied or otherwise handled in a way that minimizes impacts on surface water ad groundwaer sources. Page 5-9 Section 5 REFERENCES dierliergennd is allowed ifthe land is being managed in compliant: the AW approved by DDA. Anlmnanele MAW Men-genteel Plan {Jim litter. and preemwastewetrr In orderto relnlin in eemplilneewilli permit conditium and outer limelity,r tears. ent. Permit section 33, mmagenient pmet'ioes need unite lives-heel: urination. 'Ilie Mini-IF must re?ect production nineties and be pp. 11-15. implemented unwittingly. Storage npp-lieetien Requirement mettle o1in rhring periods when nae-i] end weldier emdltionl are motel-la- Permit election 52E. o. It). Montreal-g, Monilm'ing. and reperling oft-rem applications. and inweotion reun mint enemas dumbed Sioflhepennit. Near.- Liege Permit section 54, pp. 16?l9. Luci Application Rates Tlning agrleulmrel pne?ees and as epeei?ed in awnete plenum line hem by CIDA. Waste Permit. sections applications must not capacity ef?ie soil and empe to assimilate minimuidmli?mize water 5113. pp. 94% ll]; pollution; must be qum??eble, Ind bleed on lite HRCE Phosphorous Index. Agronomy Teehnioel Hot: #26. 51C.p.11hll haul-Ilium: remit, is prohibited. Prepmed waste Ind ornate water mplim?en to frown soil must be included inen AWE-1P. Lend nmoffieprnhihited. Delft-import Pumilsee?en 54.111.5i. 18. Miller-CAFE W. Annul?epwt Couhne?mef Miller-?e udWenIeWnter ControlFeelliliel momma." Expat-homelme ?'um ODE. For ill; Pertliipn?en team nwwmon will providepuhliemtiee and Pennitneetlen 31H, pin-Jud: E. dim Ely minimum: Hahn-e1 Rear-wees Division E1111. Forum Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5?1 0 CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 OREGON CONFINED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATION NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER 01-2009 State of Oregon Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Division and Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Division In compliance with the provisions of Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 468B, Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) Chapter 603, Division 74, The Federal Water Pollution Control Act as Amended (The Clean Water Act), Title 33 United States Code, Section 1251 et seq., and The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Until this permit expires, is modified, or revoked, permittees who have properly obtained coverage under this permit are authorized to discharge to waters of the state in accordance with the special and general conditions the follow. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 2 of 24 TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFINITIONS ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 S1. PERMIT COVERAGE .............................................................................................................................. 5 S1.A. When is a Permit Required? ............................................................................................................. 5 S1.B. Election of Permit Coverage ............................................................................................................. 6 S1.C. Requirements and Schedule to Obtain Permit Coverage .................................................................. 6 S1.D. What does this Permit Authorize? ..................................................................................................... 6 S1.E. Request for Cancellation .................................................................................................................... 7 S1.F. Individual Permit Coverage ............................................................................................................... 7 S1.G. Request for Confidentiality ............................................................................................................... 7 S1.H. Public Notice and Participation Requirements .................................................................................. 7 S2. DISCHARGE LIMITATIONS AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS ............................................. 9 S2.A. Discharge Limitations ...................................................................................................................... 9 S2.B. Production Area Limitations .............................................................................................................. 9 S2.C. Land Application Limitations ........................................................................................................... 9 S2.D. Direct Access by Animals to Surface Water in the Production Area Prohibited ............................... 10 S2.E. Waste Storage Facilities .................................................................................................................... 10 S2.F. Prevention of System Overloading .................................................................................................... 10 S2.G. Handling of Animal Mortalities ........................................................................................................ 10 S2.H. Proper Operation and Maintenance ................................................................................................... 10 S2.I. Maintaining Compliance if System Fails ........................................................................................... 10 S2.J. Setback Requirement ......................................................................................................................... 11 S2.K. Manure, Litter, or Process Waste Water Transfers ............................................................................ 11 S2.l. Proper Disposal of Other Wastes ....................................................................................................... 11 S3. ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................................................................... 12 S3.A. Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) Implementation and Compliance ................................. 12 S3.B. AWMP Submittal and Public Notice ................................................................................................ 12 S3.C AWMP Elements ............................................................................................................................... 12 S3.D. AWMP Updates and Changes ........................................................................................................... 13 S4. MONITORING, INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING, AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ....... 16 S4.A. Monitoring Requirements .................................................................................................................. 16 S4.B. Inspection Requirements ................................................................................................................... 17 S4.C. Record Keeping and Availability Requirements ............................................................................... 17 S4.D. Reporting Requirements .................................................................................................................... 18 S4.E. Additional Monitoring ....................................................................................................................... 19 G1. G2. G3. G4. G5. G6. G7. G8. G9. G10. G11. G12. G13. G14. G15. G16. G17. GENERAL CONDITIONS Noncompliance reporting requirements ......................................................................................................... 20 Additional reporting requirements [40 CFR §122.41(1)] ............................................................................... 20 Duty to comply[40 CFR §122.24(a)].............................................................................................................. 21 Compliance with other laws and statutes ........................................................................................................ 22 Property rights [40 CFR §122.41(g)].............................................................................................................. 22 Duty to reapply ............................................................................................................................................... 22 Need to halt or reduce activity not a defense [40 CFR §122.41(c)] ............................................................... 22 Duty to mitigate [40 CFR §122.41(d)] ........................................................................................................... 22 Proper operation and maintenance [40 CFR §122.41(e)] ............................................................................... 22 Permit actions ................................................................................................................................................. 22 Change of ownership or control ..................................................................................................................... 22 Duty to provide information [40 CFR §122.41(h)] ........................................................................................ 22 Inspection and entry [40 CFR §122.41(i)] ...................................................................................................... 23 Monitoring and records [40 CFR §122.41(j)] ................................................................................................. 23 Signatory requirement [40 CFR §122.21(k)] .................................................................................................. 23 Bypass [40 CFR §122.41(m)] ......................................................................................................................... 23 Upset [40 CFR §122.41(n)] ............................................................................................................................ 24 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 3 of 24 DEFINITIONS 1. “25-year, 24-hour rainfall event” means an event with a probable recurrence interval of once in twenty-five years as defined by the National Weather Service in Technical Paper Number 40, “Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States,” May 1961, or equivalent regional or state rainfall probability information developed from this source. 2. “40 CFR means Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (2008). 3. “Animal waste management plan” or “AWMP” means a written document containing the minimum elements necessary to manage manure, litter, and process waste water from operations covered by this permit in accordance with the terms and conditions of this permit. See S3.C, p. 12, for specific plan elements. 4. “CAFO” or “Confined animal feeding operation” as defined in OAR 603-074-0010(3) and OAR 340-051-0010(2) means: (a) The concentrated confined feeding or holding of animals or poultry, including but not limited to horse, cattle, sheep, or swine feeding areas, dairy confinement areas, slaughterhouse or shipping terminal holding pens, poultry and egg production facilities and fur farms; (i) In buildings or in pens or lots where the surface has been prepared with concrete, rock or fibrous material to support animals in wet weather; or (ii) That have wastewater treatment works; or (iii) That discharge any wastes into waters of the state; or (b) An animal feeding operation that is subject to regulation as a concentrated animal feeding operation pursuant to 40 CFR §122.23. 5. “Director” means the director of the State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and the Department of Agriculture or their authorized designee(s). 6. “Discharge” when used without qualification means the “discharge of a pollutant.” “Discharge of a pollutant” is defined at 40 CFR §122.2. 7. “Frozen soil” means soil that has a soil temperature of 32o F (or 0o C) or less in 3 continuous inches of the top twelve (12) inches of soil. 8. “Groundwater” means water in a saturated zone or stratum beneath the surface of land or below a surface water body. 9. “Manure” means manure or other material (e.g., bedding, compost, litter, feed waste, silage leachate, raw materials such as feed or silage) that comes into contact with manure. 10. “Medium confined animal feeding operation” means a confined animal feeding operation that meets the animal numbers specified in any of the following categories. A state medium confined animal feeding operation is only required to apply for this permit if it confines for more than four (4) months and has a waste water control facility or disposal system for wet or dry wastes. (See Table 1: CAFOs Requiring Permit Coverage.) (a) 200 to 699 mature dairy cattle, whether milked or dry; (b) 300 to 999 veal calves; (c) 300 to 999 cattle other than mature dairy cows or veal calves. Cattle includes but is not limited to heifers, steers, bulls and cow/calf pairs; (d) 750 to 2,499 swine each weighing 55 pounds or more; (e) 3,000 to 9,999 swine each weighing less than 55 pounds; (f) 150 to 499 horses; (g) 3,000 to 9,999 sheep or lambs; (h) 16,500 to 54,999 turkeys; (i) 9,000 to 29,999 laying hens or broilers, if the operation uses waste water control facilities for wet waste; (j) 37,500 to 124,999 chickens (other than laying hens), if the operation uses waste water control facilities for wet waste; (k) 25,000 to 81,999 laying hens, if the operation does not use waste water control facilities for wet waste; (l) 10,000 to 29,999 ducks if the operation does not use waste water control facilities for wet waste; or (m) 1,500 to 4,999 ducks if the operation uses waste water control facilities for wet waste. (n) For other animal types, ODA will determine the appropriate animal numbers by comparing the operation to the most similar animal type listed above. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 4 of 24 11. “New source” means any building, structure, facility, or installation from which there is or may be a “discharge of pollutants,” the construction of which commenced after April 14, 2003. 12. “Overflow” means the discharge of manure or process waste water resulting from the filling of waste water or manure storage structures beyond the point at which no more manure, process waste water, or storm water can be contained by the structure. 13. “Person” is defined at OAR 603-074-0010(13). 14. “Point source” is defined at 40 CFR §122.2. 15. “Pollutant” is defined in 40 CFR §122.2. 16. “Pollution” or “water pollution” as defined in ORS 468B.005(5). 17. “Process waste water” or “process wastes” as defined at OAR 603-074-0010(17) and OAR 603-051-0010(2) means water directly or indirectly used in the operation of the CAFO for any or all of the following: spillage or overflow from animal or poultry watering systems; washing, cleaning or flushing pens, barns, manure pits, or other CAFO facilities; direct contact swimming, washing, or spray cooling of animals; or dust control. Process waste water or process wastes also includes any water that comes into contact with any raw materials, products, or byproducts including manure, litter, feed, milk, eggs, or bedding. 18. “Production area” as defined at OAR 603-074-0010(18) and OAR 603-051-0010(3) means that part of a CAFO that includes the animal confinement area, the manure storage area, the raw materials storage area, and the waste containment areas. The animal confinement area includes but is not limited to open lots, housed lots, feedlots, confinement houses, stall barns, free stall barns, milkrooms, milking centers, cowyards, barnyards, medication pens, walkers, animal walkways, and stables. The manure storage area includes but is not limited to lagoons, runoff ponds, storage sheds, stockpiles, under house or pit storages, liquid impoundments, static piles, and composting piles. The raw materials storage area includes but is not limited to feed silos, silage bunkers, and bedding materials. The waste containment areas include but are not limited to settling basins, and areas within berms and diversions that separate uncontaminated storm water. Also included in the definition of production area is any egg washing or egg processing facility, and any area used in the storage, handling, treatment, or disposal of animal mortalities. 19. “Saturated soil” means soil with all available pore space filled that has reached its maximum retentive capacity as defined in “Qualitative Description of Soil Wetness” (Brady, N. and Weil, R., p. 201). 20. “Setback” as defined at 40 CFR §412.4(b)(1) means a specified distance from surface waters or potential conduits to surface waters where manure, litter, and process waste water may not be land applied. Examples of conduits to surface waters include but are not limited to: Open tile line intake structures, sinkholes, and agricultural well heads. 21. “State confined animal feeding operation” means a confined animal feeding operation with animal numbers below the medium confined animal feeding operation levels that is not designated as a small concentrated animal feeding operation. A small confined animal feeding operation is only required to apply for this permit if it confines for more than for (4) months and has a waste water control facility or disposal system for wet wastes. (See Table 1: CAFOs Requiring Permit Coverage.) 22. “Vegetative buffer” as defined at 40 CFR §412.4(b)(2) means a narrow, permanent strip of dense perennial vegetation established parallel to the contours of and perpendicular to the dominant slope of the field for the purposes of slowing water runoff, enhancing water infiltration, and minimizing the risk of any potential nutrients or pollutants from leaving the field and reaching surface waters. 23. “Wastes” is defined at ORS 468B.005(9). 24. “Waste storage facilities” means the physical system used for the isolation and retention of process wastes on the confined animal feeding operation until their ultimate utilization. 25. “Waste water control facility” means a “disposal system” or “treatment works” is defined at ORS 468B.005(8). 26. “Water” or “waters of the state” is defined at ORS 468B.005(10). 27. “Waters of the U.S.” is defined at 40 CFR §122.2. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 5 of 24 SPECIAL CONDITIONS S1. PERMIT COVERAGE S1.A. When is a Permit Required? 1. Pursuant to ORS 468B.200, it is the policy of the State of Oregon to protect the quality of groundwater and surface waters of Oregon by preventing animal wastes from discharging into waters of the state. To implement this policy, ORS 468B.050(1)(d) requires that any person who owns or operates a confined animal feeding operation (CAFO) listed in S1.A.2 below obtain a permit from ODA and DEQ. As a result, there is no state process to certify that a CAFO does not discharge or propose to discharge to waters of the state and permit coverage is required regardless of discharge status. Coverage under this general permit is required for all CAFOs listed in S!.A.2 unless application is made for an individual permit or an individual permit is required by ODA and DEQ. 2. Any person who owns or operates a CAFO defined as follows is required by ORS 468B.050(1)(d) to obtain coverage under this permit (see Table 1 below for more detail): (a) State small confined animal feeding operation that confines animals for more than four (4) months and has a waste water control facility or disposal system for wet or dry wastes. (b) State medium confined animal feeding operation that confines animals for more than four (4) months and has a waste water control facility or disposal system for wet or dry wastes. (c) Small, medium, or large concentrated animal feeding operation defined in 40 CFR §122.23(b). Table 1: CAFOs Requiring Permit Coverage CONFINED Type of confined animal feeding operation requiring permit coverage  Confines more than one animal for more than 4 months on prepared surface Small Confined  Waste water control facility or disposal system for wet wastes Medium Confined  Waste water control facility or disposal system for wet or dry wastes CONCENTRATED  Stabled or confined and fed or maintained for total of 45 days or more in any 12-month period  Crops, vegetation, forage growth, or post-harvest residues not sustained in normal growing season in lot or facility Small Concentrated Medium Concentrated Large Concentrated [40 CFR §122.23(b)(4)]  Significant contributor  Discharging of pollutants to waters pollutants to waters of the U.S. of the U.S.  Designated by Director [40 CFR §122.23(b)(6)] [40 CFR §122.23(b)(9)] mature dairy cows1 <200 200-699 <200 200-699 ≥700 veal calves <300 300-999 <300 300-999 ≥1,000 cattle2 <300 300-999 <300 300-999 ≥1,000 swine ≥ 55 lbs <750 750-2,499 <750 750-2,499 ≥2,500 swine < 55 lbs <3,000 3,000-9,999 <3,000 3,000-9,999 ≥10,000 horses <150 150-499 <150 150-499 ≥500 sheep or lambs <3,000 3,000-9,999 <3,000 3,000-9,999 ≥10,000 turkeys <16,500 16,500-54,999 <16,500 16,500-54,999 ≥55,000 chickens, including laying hens or <9,000 9,000-29,999 <9,000 9,000-29,999 ≥30,000 broilers w/wet waste system laying hens w/dry NA 25,000-81,999 <25,000 25,000-81,999 ≥82,000 waste system Broiler chickens w/dry waste NA 37,500-124,999 <37,500 37,500-124,999 ≥125,000 system ducks w/other than <10,000 10,000-29,999 <10,000 10,000-29,999 ≥30,000 wet waste system ducks w/wet <1,500 1,500-4,999 <1,500 1,500-4,999 ≥5,000 waste system other animal type As determined by ODA3 Designated by director. NA NA 1 Whether milked or dry 2 Other than mature dairy cows or veal calves, cattle includes but is not limited to heifers, steers, bulls and cow/calf pairs. 3 To determine the number of animals that require permit coverage, ODA will compare the operation to the most similar animal type in the table. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 6 of 24 3. Any person not wishing to be covered by this permit may apply for an individual permit in accordance with OAR 340-045-0030. Note: Failure to obtain coverage under this permit is a violation of ORS 468B.050 and 468B.215 except as provided in S1.F Individual Permit Coverage, p. 7. S1.B. Election of Permit Coverage Any person who owns or operates a CAFO who is not required to obtain coverage under this permit may elect to be covered by this permit. Any person making such an election is subject to all terms and conditions of the permit unless and until permit coverage is terminated. S1.C. Requirements and Schedule to Obtain Permit Coverage 1. Application for Proposed CAFO To obtain permit coverage, any person proposing a new CAFO that is regulated by this permit (see S1.A above) or electing to be covered by this permit must submit an ODA Application to Register (ATR) and Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) at least 180 days prior to the time that the operation commences. For information on AWMP requirements, see S3, p. 12. S1.D. 2. Future Renewal of General Permit Coverage To renew general permit coverage, the pemittee must submit a renewal application by the date specified by ODA but no later than the expiration date of this permit. 3. ODA will notify the applicant in writing if permit coverage is approved or denied. Permit coverage does not begin until this written notice is provided by ODA to the applicant. Written notification will include a Notice of Registration that will include the following: (a) The owner or operator's name; (b) Facility name and location; (c) Contact information including mailing address and telephone number; (d) Effective date of permit coverage; (e) Maximum number of animals allowed at the facility; and (f) Regulatory status of the operation. (i) ODA will use the following classifications for regulatory status: (1) Large concentrated animal feeding operation as defined in 40 CFR §122.23(b)(4); (2) Medium concentrated animal feeding operation as defined in 40 CFR §122.23(b)(6); (3) Small concentrated animal feeding operation as defined in 40 CFR §122.23(b)(9) and designated by the director pursuant to ORS 603-074-0012; (4) Medium confined animal feeding operation as defined in this permit (#10, p. 3); or (5) Small confined animal feeding operation as defined in this permit (#21, p. 4). (ii) A small or medium confined animal feeding operation will be categorized as concentrated if: (1) A discharge to waters of the U.S. occurs that is not allowed by this general permit, and (2) The operator does not or cannot make the change(s) necessary to prevent such discharge from recurring to the satisfaction of ODA. 4. Coverage under this permit will be canceled upon the issuance of an individual permit. General Permit Coverage 1. Consistent with ORS 468B.200, ODA and DEQ developed this general permit to prohibit routine discharges of manure, litter, and process waste water from CAFO operations to waters of the state. Discharges of manure, litter, or process waste water to waters of the state are only expected to occur under extreme weather conditions and as limited by the conditions of this general permit. Further, the general permit only authorizes the discharge of pollutants resulting from the processes, wastes, and operations that have been clearly identified in the permittee’s AWMP approved by ODA. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP 2. 3. S1.E. Except for any toxic effluent standards and prohibitions imposed under section 307 of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) and groundwater protection requirements established under OAR 340-040, a permittee in compliance with this permit during its term is considered to be in compliance, for purposes of enforcement, with state water quality laws and relevant sections of the CWA, as provided in 40 CFR §122.5. The specific effect of permit compliance on enforcement authority is set out in OAR 340-045-0080. Request for Cancellation 1. Any permittee may request in writing to ODA that coverage under this permit be cancelled if: (a) Conditions or standards have changed so that the CAFO no longer qualifies for or is required to have coverage under this permit; or (b) The CAFO no longer has animals on site and all waste storage and control facilities have been decommissioned in accordance with Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) conservation practice standard, code 360, entitled Closure of Waste Impoundments (Jan. 2006); and (c) The permittee certifies that it will not commence operation of a CAFO regulated by this permit at the same location without making a new application for registration under this general permit and is granted coverage or applies for and is issued an individual permit. 2. S1.F. CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 7 of 24 This permit does not cover disposal of human wastes or waste water control systems that mix human and animal wastes. Any person owning or operating such a system must apply to DEQ for coverage under an individual or general permit issued pursuant to ORS 468B.050. This general permit for CAFOs may be used in addition to an individual or general permit issued by DEQ pursuant to ORS 468B.050. ODA will respond to the request for cancellation by conducting a site inspection and a review of the permittee’s file. ODA will notify the permittee in writing of termination of coverage under this permit or deny the request with an explanation of why the request was denied. Individual Permit Coverage 1. When appropriate, the director may require any person to obtain an individual permit pursuant to OAR 3400033(10). In such cases, the person will be notified in writing by the director. This written notice will include the reason why an individual permit is being required, an application form, the amount of the permit fee due at application, and application due date. 2. If coverage under this permit has been obtained prior to the requirement for an individual permit, this permit will remain effective until the individual permit is issued provided the application for individual permit was properly made. S1.G. Request for Confidentiality The name and address of an NPDES permit applicant or permittee, NPDES permit applications (e.g., ODA ATRs) and their attachments (e.g., AWMPs), NPDES permits, and NPDES permit discharge data cannot be kept confidential pursuant to 40 CFR §122.7(b) and (c). For other information, the permittee may request that the director evaluate claims of confidentiality according to the procedures established in ORS 468.095(2). S1.H. Public Notice and Participation Requirement 1. Prior to approving new permit coverage, renewing permit coverage, or approving proposed substantial changes to an AWMP, ODA will provide public notice and participation in Table 2 below. 2. ODA may batch multiple notices as regionally appropriate. 3. Application and permit documents (e.g., ODA ATR, renewal application, AWMP) will be available for public review at ODA headquarters and appropriate field offices. If available, electronic copies of documents will be provided upon request. 4. Public hearings will be scheduled if written requests for public hearing are received during the comment period from at least ten persons or from an organization or organizations representing at least ten persons. If a hearing is scheduled, ODA will provide at least 30 days notice before the hearing is held. The public comment period will remain open for additional comments for at least 7 days after the public hearing. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 8 of 24 Table 2: CAFO Public Notice Requirements (i) Public notice of a comment period of at least 35 days provided as follows:  Posted on ODA and DEQ websites; and  Emailed to interested parties list maintained by ODA. (ii) Opportunity for public hearing. See S1.H.4, p. 7. (iii) A written response to relevant comments will be developed by ODA and made available to interested parties. (i) Public notice of a comment period of at least 14 days provided as follows:  Posted on ODA and DEQ websites; and  Emailed to interested parties list maintained by ODA. (ii) Opportunity for public hearing. See S1.H.4, p. 7. (iii) A written response to relevant comments will be developed by ODA and made available to interested parties. Small, Medium or Large Concentrated 3. Receipt of proposed substantial change to small or medium, or large concentrated animal feeding operation’s AWMP (see S3.D.2, p. 14) (i) Public notice of a comment period of at least 35 days provided as follows:  Posted on ODA and DEQ websites; and  Emailed to interested parties list maintained by ODA. (ii) Opportunity for public hearing. See S1.H.4, p. 7. (iii) A written response to relevant comments will be developed by ODA and made available to interested parties.       All Operations Permit Action 1. Public Participation Process (i) Public notice of a comment period of at least 35 days provided as follows:  Published in regional newspaper;  Posted on ODA and DEQ websites; and  Emailed to interested parties list maintained by ODA. (ii) Opportunity for public hearing. See S1.H.4, p. 7. (iii) A written response to relevant comments will be developed by ODA and made available to interested parties.  Name of operation  Name of operator or owner if different than operator, mailing address, and telephone number  Physical address of operation  Type of operation  Number of animals proposed  Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS)  AWMP summary Contents of Public Notice Note: Access to the AWMP will also be provided for public review; however, not all AWMPs will be available electronically. Receipt of ODA ATR (Application to Register) for existing operation not under permit or new proposed operation Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP 1.   Receipt of renewal application Name of operation City, county, and zip code Permit registration number Type of operation Small or Medium Confined 2. Receipt of proposed substantial change to small or medium confined animal feeding operation’s AWMP (see S3.D.1, p. 13)    Name of operation City, county, and zip code Permit registration number Type of operation Overview of proposed substantial change    Name of operation City, county, and zip code Permit registration number Type of operation Overview of proposed substantial change CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 9 of 24 S2. DISCHARGE LIMITATIONS AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS S2.A. Discharge Limitations The permittee is prohibited from discharging manure, litter, or process wastes to surface waters and groundwaters of the state, except as allowed in S2.B and S2.C and provided these discharges allowed in S2.B and S2.C do not cause or contribute to a violation of state water quality standards. Discharges to surface water due to upset or bypass are authorized only in accordance with applicable requirements in G16 Bypass [40 CFR §122.41(m)], p. 23 and G17 Upset [40 CFR §122.41(n)], p. 24. Types of discharge that are prohibited include but are not limited to: contaminated runoff from confinement or waste accumulation areas; overflow or discharges from waste storage facilities; discharges due to improper land application activities from surface drainages or field tile outlets, discharges due to equipment failure; or leakage or seepage from facilities in the production area in excess of approved designs. S2.B. S2.C. Production Area Limitations 1. For all small and medium confined animal feeding operations and small, medium, and large concentrated animal feeding operations, except new source swine, poultry, and veal large concentrated animal feeding operations: The permittee is prohibited from discharging manure, litter, or process waste water to surface waters of the state from the production area, except when: (a) Rainfall events cause an overflow of waste management and storage facilities designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to contain all manure, litter, and process waste waters including the contaminated runoff and direct precipitation from a 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event; and (b) The production area is operated in accordance with the applicable inspection, maintenance, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements of this permit. 2. For new source swine, poultry, and veal large concentrated feeding operations: The permittee is prohibited from discharging manure, litter, or process waste water to surface waters of the state. 3. The permittee must properly land apply or otherwise handle authorized discharges from the production area in a way that minimizes impacts on surface water or groundwater of the state and complies with state water quality standards. 4. The permittee must not exceed the seepage design rates approved by ODA for waste storage or animal confinement facilities and seepage to groundwater from these facilities must not violate state groundwater quality protection standards. Land Application Limitations 1. When applying manure, litter, and process waste water to lands, the permittee must apply at agronomic rates in accordance with the permittee’s ODA-approved AWMP. Land application areas include land under the control of the permittee, whether it is owned, rented, or leased, to which manure, litter, or process waste water from the production area is or may be applied. 2. The permittee’s discharges to groundwater due to seepage below the root zone of the crop or by other means must not violate state groundwater quality protection standards. 3. The permittee is allowed to apply manure, litter, or process waste water to frozen soil provided: (a) Its AWMP addresses such applications [see S3.C.3(j)]; (b) Discharge to surface waters and groundwaters of the state will not occur, except as allowed in S2.B and S2.C; and (c) Land applications do not cause or contribute to a violation of state water quality standards. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP 4. CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 10 of 24 The permittee is prohibited from applying manure, litter, or process waste water to saturated soils or during rainfall events that are expected to result in saturated soils or surface runoff. When such a application is a desired alternative to allowing waste storage or waste water control facilities to overflow (e.g., land application to saturated soils to pond waste water onsite provides for greater protection of surface waters than a direct overflow of a waste storage tank to surface waters), the land application will be considered an upset condition and the permittee must comply with the provisions of G17 Upset [40 CFR §122.41(n)], p. 24. S2.D. Direct Access by Animals to Surface Water in the Production Area Prohibited The permittee must prevent direct animal contact with surface waters of the state in the production area of its CAFO. Direct animal contact means any situation where animals in the production area have free access and are allowed to loiter or drop waste in surface waters. Direct contact with surface waters by animals on pasture or rangeland is not, by itself, a violation of this permit. S2.E. Waste Storage Facilities 1. The permittee must provide adequate storage capacity for solid and liquid wastes at all times so that land application occurs only during periods when soil and weather conditions allow for agronomic application and are in compliance with the Land Application Limitations in Condition S2.C, p. 9 of this permit. S2.F. 2. The permittee must site, design, construct, operate, and maintain all waste storage facilities consistent with the AWMP. New and modified construction of waste facilities must be approved in advance and prior to construction by ODA in conformance with ORS 468B.055 and OARs 340-051 and 603-074. 3. The permittee with a large concentrated animal feeding operation must also have depth markers in all surface liquid impoundments (e.g., lagoons, ponds, tanks) designed to clearly indicate the: (a) Maximum design volume, (b) Minimum capacity necessary to contain the 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event, including additional freeboard requirements, and (c) Depth of manure and process waste water. Prevention of System Overloading 1. The permittee may not increase the number of animals over 10% or 25 animals, whichever is greater, of the maximum number assigned by ODA in the Notice of Registration and General Permit Summary until an updated plan is approved in writing by ODA (see S3.B AWMP Submittal, p. 12, and S3.D AWMP Changes, p. 13). 2. Animal numbers must not exceed the capacity of the waste storage facilities. S2.G. Handling of Animal Mortalities The permittee must not dispose of animal mortalities in liquid manure or waste water control facilities. Animal mortalities must be handled in such a way as to prevent discharge of pollutants to surface water or groundwater. S2.H. Proper Operation and Maintenance The permittee must at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems used for process waste water collection, storage and utilization, and correct any deficiencies found as soon as possible. S2.I. Maintaining Compliance if System Fails The permittee must control all applications and discharges upon reduction, loss or failure of the waste storage or utilization facilities until the facilities are restored or an alternative method of storage or utilization is provided. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 11 of 24 S2.J. S2.K. S2.L. Setback Requirement The permittee must develop a setback for any mechanical application of manure, litter, or process waste water occurring in the land application area(s) adjacent to any surface waters, open tile intake structures, sinkholes, well heads, or other conduits to surface or ground waters where manure, litter, and other process waste waters are prohibited. The setback distances must be included in the permittee’s AWMP. For large concentrated animal feeding operation, this setback must be 100 feet or as a compliance alternative and if demonstrated to the satisfaction of ODA in the AWMP, the permittee for the large concentrated animal feeding operation may: 1. Establish a 35-foot vegetated buffer where manure, litter, and other process waste waters are prohibited; or 2. Demonstrate that a setback or vegetated buffer is not necessary or may be reduced because implementation of alternative conservation practices or field-specific conditions will provide pollutant reductions equivalent or better than the reductions that would be achieved by the 100 foot setback. Manure, Litter, or Process Waste Water Transfers 1. The permittee retains responsibility of the manure, litter, or process waste water until the transfer or export is completed with the required documentation. 2. The permittee must maintain manure, litter, or process waste water transfer or export records as required by S4.C.2(d), p. 17. 3. Prior to transferring manure, litter, or process waste water to other persons, the permittee with a large concentrated animal feeding operation must provide the recipient of manure, letter, or process waste water with the a manure nutrient analysis conducted within the previous 12 months. Proper Disposal of Other Wastes Chemicals, contaminants, and other wastes may not be disposed of in any treatment or storage system for contaminated storm water from the production area, manure, litter, or process waste water unless the system is designed to treat such chemicals, contaminants, or wastes and the chemical, contaminants, or other wastes are identified in the AWMP. In addition, chemicals, contaminants, and other wastes may not be disposed of in any system designed for diversion of uncontaminated storm water. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 12 of 24 S3. ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN S3.A. S3.B. S3.C. Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) Implementation and Compliance 1. Upon registration to this permit, the permittee must implement its current ODA-approved AWMP developed for its CAFO. 2. The permittee’s ODA approved AWMP is incorporated into this permit by reference. The permittee must comply with all terms and conditions of its ODA-approved AWMP. Failure to comply with the ODAapproved AWMP constitutes a violation of the terms and conditions of this permit. 3. Absence of a AWMP or absence of ODA approval of an AWMP does not allow the permittee to violate the provisions of S2 Discharge Limitations and Operating Requirements, p. 9 or other permit requirements. AWMP Submittal and Public Notice 1. The applicant proposing a new CAFO or electing coverage under this permit must submit its AWMP with the ODA ATR to ODA for review and approval according to the schedule provided in S1.C, p. 6. 2. If necessary to meet the AWMP requirements in this permit, the existing permittee with coverage under the previous version of this general permit must submit a revised or updated AWMP prior to renewing registration under this permit. 3. AWMPs are subject to public notice and participation requirements detailed in condition S1.H, p. 7. AWMP Elements 1. The permittee must ensure that its AWMP is adequate for the proposed or existing population of animals, reflective or the proposed or existing facility operation, and be prepared in accordance with the terms and conditions of this permit, OAR 340-051, and NRCS conservation practice standard guidance 590 for Oregon dated May 2008 entitled Nutrient Management. Note: In the event of any inconsistency between the conditions of this permit and NRCS 590, the conditions of this permit apply. 2. The AWMP may include a schedule for improvement projects. 3. The AWMP must to the extent applicable include the following: (a) Procedures to ensure adequate collection, handling, and storage of contaminated strom water runoff from the production area, manure, litter and process waste water in compliance with the requirements of S2. Discharge Limitation and Operating Requirements. Calculations used to determine that storage capacity exists must be provided, including a demonstration the facilities are at least designed and constructed to contain all manure, litter, process waste water, contaminated storm water runoff from the production area, and direct precipitation from a 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event. (b) Procedures to ensure proper operation and maintenance of the storage facilities; (c) Procedures to ensure proper management of animal mortalities. Animal mortalities may not be disposed of in any storage or treatment system that is not specifically designed to treat animal mortalities; (d) Procedures to ensure that clean water is diverted, as appropriate, from the production area; (e) Procedures to prevent direct contact of confined animals with surface waters; (f) Identification of appropriate site-specific conservation practices to be implemented, including buffers, setback areas, or equivalent practices, to control runoff of pollutants to surface water and groundwater; (g) Protocols to land apply manure, litter or process waste water in accordance with site specific nutrient management practices that ensure appropriate agricultural utilization of the nutrients in the manure, litter or process waste water. The protocols must include the following: (i) The NRCS Phosphorous Index, USDA/NRCS Oregon Agronomy Technical Note #26, revised June 2008, must be completed for all fields that receive manure , litter or process waste water to determine if nitrogen or phosphorous is the most limiting nutrient. The maximum nutrient Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 13 of 24 application rate must be calculated for the most limiting nutrient (from Technical Note #26) and must account for all other nitrogen and phosphorus sources. (ii) Expected crop yields. (iii) Calculations showing the total nitrogen and phosphorus to be applied annually to each field, including sources other than manure, litter, or process waste water. (iv) Annual manure application rates and an explanation of the basis for determining these rates. For large concentrated animal feeding operations, these rates must be based on actual test data. For other operations, data or “book values” from established reference sources (e.g., Oregon Animal Waste Management program) may be used instead of actual testing. (v) Method(s) used to apply manure, litter, or process waste water. (h) For large concentrated animal feeding operations, protocols for appropriate testing of manure, litter, process waste water, and soil. For other operations, references used instead of actual testing data or test protocols if testing. (i) If applicable, an Agricultural Compost Management Plan as required by OAR 340-096. (j) Frozen soil application procedures if applications of manure, litter, or process waste water will be made to frozen soil. At a minimum, the following must be provided: (i) Description of the potential receiving field(s), estimates of waste amounts and types, and estimated timing of applications. (ii) Aerial photo(s) identifying all areas and surface water bodies within 1,000 ft. of the boundaries of the receiving field(s). (iii) Soil map(s) identifying soil types for receiving field(s). (iv) Topographic map(s) for receiving field(s). (v) Description of the structural practices in place to ensure that no discharges to surface water occur during application and after the soil thaws. (vi) Description of the method used to determine when soil is frozen and management practices to be followed when planning an application and during and after an application to frozen soil. (vii) Description of monitoring and reporting requirements to ensure that the permittee is in compliance with frozen soil application procedures. (k) Procedures for transfer or export of manure, litter, or process waste water. (l) Identification of specific records that will be maintained to document the implementation and management of the minimum elements described above. S3.D. AWMP Changes 1. Requirements for small or medium confined animal feeding operations (see Table 3,p. 15, for an overview) (a) Substantial changes. The permittee must submit any proposal to make substantial changes to its AWMP to ODA for approval at least 45 days in advance of the proposed changes. ODA will public notice the proposal as described in S1.H, p. 7. ODA will notify the permittee of its final decision concerning the proposed changes after the public notice period ends. The permittee may not implement a proposed change until ODA has approved it. The following types of changes to an AWMP are considered substantial: (i) A change in the type of manure system including but not limited to switching from a dry to a liquid manure system, switching from a liquid to a dry manure system, or changing the manure system to accommodate an animal species or type of operation not included in the scope of the current AWMP. (ii) An increase in maximum allowed animal numbers such that the operation becomes defined as a large concentrated animal feeding operation. (b) Non-substantial changes. Public notice of non-substantial changes (described below) to an AWMP is not required; however, the permittee must submit its proposal to make such a change to ODA for approval at least 45 days in advance of the proposed change unless a different timeframe is allowed by ODA. ODA will notify the permittee of its final decision concerning the proposed change after reviewing the proposal. The permittee may not implement a proposed change until ODA has approved it. The following changes to an AWMP are considered non-substantial provided they do not result in a substantial modification listed in paragraph (a) above: Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 14 of 24 (i) An increase in animal numbers greater than 10% of the registrant’s maximum allowed animal numbers provided the increase does not change the operation into a large concentrated animal feeding operation. (ii) When facility expansions, production increases, or process modifications will result in new or increased generation of waste, litter, or process waste water beyond the scope of the current AWMP. 2. Requirements for small, medium or large concentrated animal feeding operations (see Table 3,p. 15, for an overview): (a) Substantial changes. The permittee must submit any proposal to make substantial changes to its AWMP to ODA for approval at least 60 days in advance of the proposed changes. ODA will public notice the proposal as described in S1.H, p. 7. ODA will notify the permittee of its final decision concerning the proposed changes after the public notice period ends. The permittee may not implement a proposed change until ODA has approved it. The following types of changes to an AWMP are considered substantial: (i) Addition of new land application areas not previously included in the AWMP, unless the land application area is covered by an existing AWMP that has already been incorporated into an existing NPDES permit and the application of manure, litter, or process waste water on the newly added land application area is in accordance with that existing NPDES permit. (ii) Any changes to the field-specific maximum annual rates for land application. (iii) Any changes to the maximum amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus derived from all sources for each crop. (iv) Addition of any crop or other uses not included in the AWMP and corresponding field-specific rates of application. (v) A change in the type of manure system including but not limited to switching from a dry to a liquid manure system, switching from a liquid to a dry manure system, or changing the manure system to accommodate an animal species or type of operation not included in the scope of the current AWMP. (vi) Any changes that are likely to increase the risk of nitrogen and phosphorus transport to surface waters or groundwaters. (b) Non-substantial changes. Public notice of non-substantial changes (described below) to an AWMP is not required; however, the permittee must submit its proposal to make such a change to ODA for approval at least 60 days in advance of the proposed change unless a different timeframe is allowed by ODA. ODA will notify the permittee of its final decision concerning the proposed change after reviewing the proposal. The permittee may not implement a proposed change until ODA has approved it. The following changes to an AWMP are considered non-substantial provided they do not result in a substantial modification listed in paragraph (a) above: (i) An increase in animal numbers greater than 10% of the registrant’s maximum allowed animal numbers. (ii) When facility expansions, production increases, or process modifications will result in new or increased generation of waste, litter, or process waste water beyond the scope of the current AWMP. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 15 of 24 Table 3: Overview of Requirements for Proposed Changes to AWMPs SMALL OR MEDIUM CONFINED SMALL, MEDIUM OR LARGE CONCENTRATED Substantial Change Non-Substantial Change Substantial Change Description of proposed change 1. A change in the type of manure system including but not limited to switching from a dry to a liquid manure system, switching from a liquid to a dry manure system, or changing the manure system to accommodate an animal species or type of operation not included in the scope of the current AWMP. 2. An increase in maximum allowed animal numbers such that the operation becomes defined as a large concentrated animal feeding operation. The following are considered non-substantial provided they do not result in a substantial change: 1. An increase in animal numbers greater than 10% of the registrant’s maximum allowed animal numbers. 2. When facility expansions, production increases, or process modifications will result in new or increased generation of waste, litter, or process waste water beyond the scope of the current AWMP. The following are considered non-substantial provided they do not result in a substantial change: 1. An increase in animal numbers greater than 10% of the registrant’s maximum allowed animal numbers. 2. When facility expansions, production increases, or process modifications will result in new or increased generation of waste, litter, or process waste water beyond the scope of the current AWMP. Timeline to submit proposal to ODA Submit at least 45 days in advance of proposed change(s). Submit at least 45 days in advance of proposed change(s) unless a different timeframe allowed by ODA. 1. Addition of new land application areas not previously included in the AWMP, unless the land application area is covered by an existing AWMP that has already been incorporated into an existing NPDES permit and the application of manure, litter, or process waste water on the newly added land application area is in accordance with that existing NPDES permit. 2. Any changes to the fieldspecific maximum annual rates for land application. 3. Any changes to the maximum amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus derived from all sources for each crop. 4. Addition of any crop or other uses not included in the AWMP and corresponding fieldspecific rates of application. 5. A change in the type of manure system including but not limited to switching from a dry to a liquid manure system, switching from a liquid to a dry manure system, or changing the manure system to accommodate an animal species or type of operation not included in the scope of the current AWMP. 6. Any changes that are likely to increase the risk of nitrogen and phosphorus transport to surface waters or groundwaters. Submit at least 60 days in advance of proposed change(s). Public notice process . ODA approval ODA will public notice as described in S1.H, p. 7. Not required. ODA will public notice as described in S1.H, p. 7. Not required. ODA will notify the permittee of its final decision concerning the proposed change(s) after the public notice period ends. ODA will notify the permittee of its final decision concerning the proposed change(s) after reviewing the proposal. ODA will notify the permittee of its final decision concerning the proposed change(s) after the public notice period ends. ODA will notify the permittee of its final decision concerning the proposed change(s) after reviewing the proposal. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Non-Substantial Change Submit at least 60 days in advance of proposed change(s) unless a different timeframe allowed by ODA. CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 16 of 24 S4. MONITORING, INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING, AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS S4.A. Monitoring Requirements 1. Discharge Monitoring If a discharge to surface water or groundwater occurs that is not allowed by S2.B or S2.C, p. 9, the permittee must record the following information: (a) A description and cause of the discharge; (b) The period of discharge including exact dates, times and duration of discharge; (c) An estimate of discharge volume; (d) Name or location of receiving water; and (e) Corrective steps taken, if appropriate, to reduce, eliminate or prevent reoccurrence of the discharge. 2. Analytical Monitoring The permittee must conduct the following sampling and analysis according to the following schedule: (a) Large concentrated animal feeding operations only Sample Type Manure, litter, and process waste water Analytical Parameter (i) Total nitrogen (ii) Total phosphorus Minimum Frequency Annually Exported manure, litter, and process waste water Soil from land application area(s) (i) Total nitrogen (ii) Total phosphorus Annually (i) Total nitrogen (ii) Total phosphorus Once every 5 years from all fields where manure, litter, or process waste water is applied. Sample Method Sample according to guidance contained in NRCS 590 or 633 practice standard. Sample according to guidance contained in NRCS 590 or 633 practice standard. Sample according to guidance contained in PNW 570-E, EM 8832-E, or NRCS 590 practice standard. (b) Other confined animal feeding operations Sample Type Soil from land application area(s) Analytical Parameter (i) Total nitrogen (ii) Total phosphorus Minimum Frequency Once every 5 years from all fields where manure, litter, or process waste water is applied. Sample Method Sample according to guidance contained in PNW 570-E, EM 8832-E, or NRCS 590 practice standard. Note: In the event of any inconsistency between the monitoring requirements of this permit and NRCS 590, the monitoring requirements of this permit apply. The permittee should be aware that NRCS 590 monitoring frequencies may need to be followed to access or maintain federal funds. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 17 of 24 S4.B. Inspection Requirements 1. The permittee must conduct the following inspections: Item (a) Stormwater diversion devices, runoff diversion structures, animal waste storage structures, and devices channeling contaminated storm water to the waste water and manure storage and containment structures. (b) Water lines, including drinking water or cooling water lines. (c) Equipment used for land application of manure, litter, or process waste water (d) Liquid impoundments for manure and process waste water 2. S4.C. Large Concentrated Weekly and record results Other Operations Periodically Daily and record results Periodically Daily when equipment is in use and record results Weekly and record depth of manure and process waste water according to depth marker required by S2.E.3, p. 10 Periodically when equipment is in use Periodically Any deficiencies found as a result of these inspections must be corrected as soon as possible. The permittee with a large concentrated animal feeding operation must record any actions taken to correct these deficiencies and, if deficiencies are not corrected within 30 days, provide an explanation of the factors preventing immediate correction. Recordkeeping and Availability Requirements 1. The permittee must maintain all information required by this permit at the facility for at least five (5) years and make this information available to ODA upon request. 2. Upon obtaining permit coverage, must record the following information. (Note: If any of the following information is provided in the permittee’s AWMP, a separate record keeping effort is not required.) (a) (b) (c) (d) Item Date, amount, and nutrient loading of manure, litter, or process waste water applied to each field. Weather conditions at the time of application and 24 hours before and after application. Total amount of nitrogen and phosphorus actually applied annually to each field, including documentation of calculations of the total amount applied. Total amount of manure or waste water transferred or exported to other persons. (e) Description of actions taken to correct deficiencies discovered during inspections. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Large Concentrated Required Other Operations Required Required Not required Required Required Required. Also include: (i) Date and amount of each transfer or export (ii) Name and address of each recipient (iii) Copy of the manure nutrient analysis conducted provided to the recipient [see S2.K.3, p. 11 Required (see S4.B.2, p. 17) Required Not required CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 18 of 24 S4.D. Reporting Requirements 1. 24-hour Reporting (a) If a discharge to surface water or groundwater occurs that is not allowed by Condition S2.B and S2.C, p. 9, the permittee must notify ODA within 24 hours of the discharge . The permittee must submit a written report within five (5) days to ODA. The information to be submitted is listed in the monitoring requirements (see S4.A, p. 16 above) of this permit. (b) The permittee must report to ODA within 24 hours of becoming aware of any significant physical failure at any time of a waste water control facility required under this permit. (c) The permittee must notify ODA within 24 hours of any permit noncompliance that may endanger health or the environment as described in G2.6, p. 20. 2. Annual Report (a) The permittee must submit an annual report to ODA by March 15 of each year. The annual report must include the following for the previous calendar year: (i) Maximum number and type of animals approved by ODA in the permittee’s Notice of Registration, whether in open confinement or housed under roof (e.g,, beef cattle, broilers, layers, swine weighing 55 pounds or more, swine weighing less than 55 pounds, mature dairy cows, dairy heifers, veal calves, sheep and lambs, horses, ducks, turkeys, other). (ii) Actual number of animals by type at the CAFO averaged over the year. (iii) Estimated amount of total manure, litter, process waste water and other material that comes into contact with manure generated by the CAFO (tons, gallons, cubic feet, or cubic yards). (iv) Estimated amount of total manure, litter, process waste water and other material transferred to other persons by the permittee (tons, gallons, cubic feet, or cubic yards). (v) Estimated amount of manure, bedding, litter, process waste water, and other material that comes in contact with manure applied to land by the permittee (tons, gallons, cubic feet, or cubic yards). (vi) Total number of acres for land application covered by the AWMP developed in accordance with the terms of this permit. (vii) Total number of acres under control of the permittee that were used for land application of manure, litter and process waste water. (viii) Summary of all manure, litter and process waste water discharges from the production area that have occurred, including date, time and approximate volume. (ix) A statement indicating whether the AWMP was developed or approved by a certified waste management planner. (x) As required by 40 CFR §122.42(e)(4)(viii), the concentrated animal feeding operation that discharges or proposes to discharge to waters of the U.S. must also report the following: (1) Actual crop(s) planted and actual yield(s) for each field. (2) Actual nitrogen and phosphorus content of the manure, litter, and process waste water. (3) Data used and results of calculations based on protocol in the ODA-approved AWMP. (4) Amount of manure litter, and process waste water applied to each field during the previous 12 months. (5) Results of soil testing for nitrogen and phosphorus if testing was performed. (6) Amount of any supplemental fertilizer applied. (b) The annual report must be signed and certified by the permittee or permittee’s authorized representative with the following statement: “I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direct supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.” Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 19 of 24 S4.E. Additional Monitoring 1. ODA may establish specific monitoring requirements in addition to those contained in this permit by administrative order. An administrative order is an agency action expressed in writing directed to a named person or named persons (ORS 183.310). 2. If a permittee experiences two or more discharges within a 24-month period that are not associated with a 25year, 24-hour or greater rainfall event, ODA may require surface water and/or groundwater quality monitoring or transfer the permittee to an individual permit. Monitoring for the following parameters may be required: bacteria, total suspended solids, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, biochemical oxygen demand, and other nutrient indicators. If ODA waives the additional monitoring requirements because such monitoring would be impracticable or not likely to produce useful information, ODA will set out the basis for the decision in writing and make the decision available to interested parties. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 20 of 24 GENERAL CONDITIONS G1. Noncompliance reporting requirements 1. If for any reason, the permittee does not comply with, or will be unable to comply with any of the requirements or conditions specified in the permit, the permittee must, at a minimum, provide ODA with the following information: (a) A description of the nature and cause of noncompliance, including the quantity and quality of any unauthorized waste discharges; (b) The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, and the anticipated time when the permittee will return to compliance; and (c) The steps taken, or to be taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the noncompliance. 2. In addition, the permittee must take immediate action to stop, contain, and clean up any unauthorized discharges and take all reasonable steps to minimize any adverse impacts to waters of the state and correct the problem. The permittee must notify ODA by telephone so that an investigation may be made to evaluate any resulting impacts and the corrective actions taken to determine if additional action should be taken. 3. Compliance with these requirements does not relieve the permittee from responsibility to maintain continuous compliance with the conditions of this permit or resulting liability for failure to comply G2. Additional reporting requirements [40 CFR §122.41(1)] 1. Planned changes. The permittee shall give notice to the director as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required only when: (a) The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for determining whether a facility is a new source in §122.29(b); or (b) The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants which are subject neither to effluent limitations in the permit, nor to notification requirements under §122.42(a)(1). (c) The alteration or addition results in a significant change in the permittee’s sludge use or disposal practices, and such alteration, addition, or change may justify the application of permit conditions that are different from or absent in the existing permit, including notification of additional use or disposal sites not reported during the permit application process or not reported pursuant to an approved land application plan; 2. Anticipated noncompliance. The permittee shall give advance notice to the director of any planned changes the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. 3. Transfers. This permit is not transferable to any person except after notice to the director. The director may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit to change the name of the permittee and incorporate such other requirements as may be necessary under the Clean Water Act (See §122.61; in some cases, modification or revocation and reissuance is mandatory.) 4. Monitoring reports. Monitoring results must be reported at the intervals specified elsewhere in this permit. (a) Monitoring results must be reported on a Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) or forms provided or specified by the director for reporting results of monitoring of sludge use or disposal practices. (b) If the permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by the permit using test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136, or another method required for an industry-specific waste stream under 40 CFR subchapters N or O, the results of such monitoring must be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the CMR or sludge reporting form specified by the director. (c) Calculations for all limitations which require averaging of measurements must utilize an arithmetic mean unless otherwise specified by the director in the permit. 5. Compliance schedules. Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on, interim and final requirements contained in any compliance schedule of this permit must be submitted no later than 14 days following each schedule date. 6. Twenty-four hour reporting. (a) The permittee shall report any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment. Any information must be provided orally within 24 hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. A written submission must also be provided within 5 days of the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission must contain a description of the noncompliance and its cause; the period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 21 of 24 7. 8. corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. (b) The following must be included as information which must be reported within 24 hours under this paragraph. (i) Any unanticipated bypass which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit. (See §122.41(g) or condition G16, p. 23.) (ii) Any upset which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit. (See §122.41(n) or condition G17, p. 24.) (iii) Violation of a maximum daily discharge limitation for any of the pollutants listed by the director in the permit to be reported within 24 hours. (See §122.44(g).) (c) The director may waive the written report on a case-by-case basis for reports under paragraph G2.6(b) of this section if the oral report has been received within 24 hours. Other noncompliance. The permittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under paragraphs G2.4, 5, and 6 of this section, at the time monitoring reports are submitted. The reports must contain the information listed in paragraph G2.6 of this section. Other information. Where the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or in any report to the director, it shall promptly submit such facts or information. G3. Duty to comply [40 CFR §122.41(a)] The permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of a permit renewal application. 1. The permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under section 307(a) of the Clean Water Act for toxic pollutants and with standards for sewage sludge use or disposal established under section 405(d) of the CWA within the time provided in the regulations that establish these standards or prohibitions or standards for sewage sludge use or disposal, even if the permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the requirement. 2. The Clean Water Act provides that any person who violates section 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318 or 405 of the Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing any such sections in a permit issued under section 402, or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under sections 402(a)(3) or 402(b)(8) of the Act, is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $25,000 per day for each violation. The Clean Water Act provides that any person who negligently violates sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act, or any condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of the Act, or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under section 402(a)(3) or 402(b)(8) of the Act, is subject to criminal penalties of $2,500 to $25,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment of not more than 1 year, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a negligent violation, a person shall be subject to criminal penalties of not more than $50,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 2 years, or both. Any person who knowingly violates such sections, or such conditions or limitations is subject to criminal penalties of $5,000 to $50,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment for not more than 3 years, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knowing violation, a person shall be subject to criminal penalties of not more than $100,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment of not more than 6 years, or both. Any person who knowingly violates section 301, 302, 303, 306, 307, 308, 318 or 405 of the Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of the Act, and who knows at that time that he thereby places another person in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury, shall, upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $250,000 or imprisonment of not more than 15 years, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knowing endangerment violation, a person shall be subject to a fine of not more than $500,000 or by imprisonment of not more than 30 years, or both. An organization, as defined in section 309(c)(3)(B)(iii) of the CWA, shall, upon conviction of violating the imminent danger provision, be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000,000 and can be fined up to $2,000,000 for second or subsequent convictions. 3. Any person may be assessed an administrative penalty by the Administrator for violating section 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318 or 405 of this Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of this Act. Administrative penalties for Class I violations are not to exceed $10,000 per violation, with the maximum amount of any Class I penalty assessed not to exceed $25,000. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 22 of 24 Penalties for Class II violations are not to exceed $10,000 per day for each day during which the violation continues, with the maximum amount of any Class II penalty not to exceed $125,000. G4. Compliance with other laws and statutes Nothing in the permit will be construed as excusing the permittee from compliance with any applicable federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, or regulations. G5. Property rights [40 CFR §122.41(g)] This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privilege. G6. Duty to reapply If the permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this permit, the permittee must apply for a new permit or renewal permit. The application must be submitted at least 180 days before the expiration date of this permit. The director may grant permission in writing to submit an application less than 180 days in advance but no later than the permit expiration date. G7. Need to halt or reduce activity not a defense [40 CFR §122.41(c)] It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. G8. Duty to mitigate [40 CFR §122.41(d)] The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge or sludge use or disposal in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. G9. Proper operation and maintenance [40 CFR §122.41(e)] The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are installed by a permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit. G10. Permit actions 1. This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition. [40 CFR §122.41(f)] 2. After notice, registration under this permit may be modified or revoked as it applies to any person for cause as follows: (a) Violation of any terms or conditions of the permit, (b) Failure of the permittee to disclose fully all relevant facts, or misrepresentations of any relevant facts by the permittee during the permit issuance process and during the life of the permit; (c) Failure to pay permit fees required by Oregon Administrative Rule when due; (d) Information indicating that the permitted operation poses a threat to human health or welfare; (e) A change in ownership or control of the operation, or (f) Other causes listed in 40 CFR §122.62 and 122.63. 3. Modification or revocation of coverage under this permit as it applies to any person may be initiated by ODA. 4. Issuance of coverage under an individual permit may be initiated by ODA in accordance with condition S1.F Individual Permit Coverage, p. 7. G11. Change of Ownership or Control The permittee must notify ODA in writing thirty (30) days prior to a change in facility ownership or control. G12. Duty to provide information [40 CFR §122.41(h)] The permittee shall furnish to the director, within a reasonable time, any information which the director may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit or to determine Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 23 of 24 compliance with this permit. The permittee shall also furnish to the director upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this permit. G13. Inspection and entry [40 CFR §122.41(i)] The permittee shall allow the director, or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor acting as a representative of the Administrator), upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to: 1. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit; 2. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit; 3. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and 4. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act or state law, any substances or parameters at any location. G14. Monitoring and records [40 CFR §122.41(j)] 1. Samples and measurements taken for the purpose of monitoring must be representative of the monitored activity. 2. Except for records of monitoring information required by this permit related to the permittee's sewage sludge use and disposal activities, which must be retained for a period of at least five years (or longer as required by 40 CFR part 503), the permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the application for this permit, for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the sample, measurement, report or application. This period may be extended by request of the director at any time. 3. Records of monitoring information must include: (a) The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements; (b) The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements; (c) The date(s) analyses were performed; (d) The individual(s) who performed the analyses; (e) The analytical techniques or methods used; and (f) The results of such analyses. 4. Monitoring must be conducted according to test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136 unless another method is required under 40 CFR subchapters N or O. 5. The Clean Water Act provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this permit shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000, or by imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or both. If a conviction of a person is for a violation committed after a first conviction of such person under this paragraph, punishment is a fine of not more than $20,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 4 years, or both. G15. Signatory requirement [40 CFR §122.21(k)] 1. All applications, reports, or information submitted to the director shall be signed and certified. (See §122.22) 2. The CWA provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be maintained under this permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or non-compliance shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 6 months per violation, or by both. G16. Bypass [40 CFR §122.41(m)] 1. Definitions. (a) Bypass means the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility. (b) Severe property damage means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities which causes them to become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by delays in production. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP CAFO NPDES General Permit #01-2009 Expiration Date: May 31, 2014 Page 24 of 24 2. 3. 4. Bypass not exceeding limitations. The permittee may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of paragraphs G17.3 and 4 of this section. Notice (a) Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice, if possible at least ten days before the date of the bypass. (b) Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required in paragraph G2.6 of this section (24-hour notice). Prohibition of bypass. (a) Bypass is prohibited, and the director may take enforcement action against a permittee for bypass, unless: (i) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage; (ii) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and (iii) The permittee submitted notices as required under paragraph G16.3 of this section. (b) The director may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if the director determines that it will meet the three conditions listed above in G16.4(a) of this section. G17. Upset [40 CFR §122.41(n)] 1. Definition. Upset means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with technology based permit effluent limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation. 2. Effect of an upset. An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with such technology based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of paragraph G17.3 of this section are met. No determination made during administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final administrative action subject to judicial review. 3. Conditions necessary for a demonstration of upset. A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: (a) The upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset; (b) The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated; and (c) The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required in paragraph G2.6(b)(ii) of this section (24 hour notice). (d) The permittee complied with any remedial measures required under paragraph G8 of this section. 4. Burden of proof. In any enforcement proceeding the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Section 5 REFERENCES PUBLICATIONS AND SOFTWARE Crop Fertilizer Recommendations Nutrient Requirements for Dairy Cattle 7th Ed, 2001 Natl. Research Council http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309069971 OSU EM8978-E, June 2009 (w. of Cascades); PNW615, 2010 (e. of Cascades) http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/details.php?sortnum=0134&name=Fertilizer+Gu ides Extension Service Publications Field Corn, Eastern Oregon-East of the Cascades, FG 71, January 2000 http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/20643/fg71-e.pdf Nitrogen Uptake and Utilization by Pacific Northwest Crops, PNW 513, December 1999 http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/20719/pnw513.pdf Manure Application Rates for Forage Production, OSU EM 8585-E, July 2007 http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/20536/em8585-e.pdf Monitoring Soil Nutrients Using a Management Unit Approach, PNW 570-E, October 2003, http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/20762/pnw570-e.pdf Post-Harvest Soil Nitrate Testing for Manured Croppings Systems, EM 8832-E, May 2003, http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/20221/em8832-e.pdf Silage Corn, Western Oregon, EM 8978-E, June 2009 http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/20610/em8978-e.pdf Soil Test Interpretation Guide, OSU EC 1478, August 1999 http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/22023/ec1478.pdf Feed Management Feed Management, A tool for balancing nutrients on dairies and other livestock operations, EM 8913-E, July 2006 http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/20501/em8913-e.pdf Manure Application Setback Features/Distances CAFO General Permit #1 http://oregon.gov/ODA/NRD/docs/pdf/cafo_gnlpmt.pdf Manure Nutrient Availability Waste Utilization Jobsheet 633 OR-JS, Oregon USDA-NRCS, May 2003 http://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov/references/public/OR/633js042707.pdf Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5-27 Section 5 REFERENCES Phosphorus Assessment Agronomy Technical Note No. 26: The Phosphorus Index, Oregon NRCS, June 2008 ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/OR/Technical_Notes/Agronomy/Agronomy26.pdf Agricultural Phosphorus Management Using the Oregon/Washington Phosphorus Indexes http://eesc.orst.edu/agcomwebfile/edmat/em8848-e.pdf Practice Standards Oregon NRCS Nutrient Management Standard (590), May 2008 http://efotg.nrcs.usda.gov/references/public/OR/590std.doc Record Keeping Online Decision making And Record Keeping, March 2014 http://www.odark.org Oregon ODA CAFO Recordkeeping Calendar, January 2014 http://www.oregon.gov/ODA/NRD/pages/cafoprogdocs.aspx Water Quality/Quantity Oregon NRCS Water Quality Technical Note No. 1: Water Quality Indicator Tools, October 2000, ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/OR/Technical_Notes/Water%20Quality/WaterQual01.pdf Software Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, RUSLE2 version 1.26.6.4, October 2006 http://fargo.nserl.purdue.edu/rusle2_dataweb/RUSLE2_Index.htm Oregon Animal Waste Management Planning Tool, ORAWMv4.9, June 2014 http://www.oregon.gov/ODA/NRD/pages/cafoprogdocs.aspx Oregon ODA CAFO Recordkeeping Calendar, January 2014 http://www.oregon.gov/ODA/NRD/pages/cafoprogdocs.aspx Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5-28 Section 5 REFERENCES ORAWM WORKBOOK OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) 110042014 Version 5.0 CLIENT: Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Inc. ASSISTED BY: Tom Thomson, NW Agricultural Consulting I ANIMAL INVENTORY Milk Production in I 85 umber Average Animal utrient Prod uctiun Annual of Weight Units (lstd ayf 1000 lb. Animal Unit) (lstday) Manure Days Days Days Off Type of Animal Animals (1115.) (1,000 111.) 1? Con?ned Grazed Farm 7 1,090 1,300 1,417.0 0.73 0,13 0.34 1034.41 182.23 1178.10 1.81 289 76 0 148 1,400 307 2 0.30 0.04 0.10 63.16 8.70 20.72 0.92 189 176 0 (12'0.05. 0.12 89 02 15 23 40.16 0.90 18?) 176 0 CALVES (1'12 Month? 341 150 51.2 0.42 0.05 0.11 2 .48 2.76 5.63 1.34 305 60 0 1.924 955 2.0100 0.60 0. I 0 0.27 1,207.1 208.9 544.6 1.6 GRAZING PERIOD Percent of Month and Number of Animals Grazi . FEB NIAR APR NIAY SEP AU-YR. . . II 0/0 170/0 33 0/0 33 33 1090 1090 1090 1090 1090 14 ?"211 500/0 75?41 75%) 75000/0 500/0 750/01 759/0 75000/0 20?11? 25%) 25%: 25%: 341 341 341 341 341 MILKER (DRY) HFIFFRS 12-24 Months] CALVES {1-12 Monlhs) 5 Page of 3 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5?29 Section 5 REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) Version 5.0 11110112014 CLIENT ASSISTED Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Inc. I Tom Thomson. NW Agricultural Consulting I ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INVENTORY WEATHER STATION TILLAMOOK 1 AREAS CONTRIBUTING RUNOFF T0 LIQUID STORAGE FACILITY 25Yr-24lIr 6.00 Lot Runoff Factors as Description ?f Run?ffArca Area in SF 93100 a Percent of Paved Lot Area 5,600 Average 1'19"? Precipitation ls paved lot scraped daily? (YIN) YES Month Precipitation Evaporation Paved Unpaved Unpaved Lot A rca 0 October 6 I _42 I Area 0 o? ember 13.71 0.75 100% 25% Surface Area of Silage Storage 0 December 13.94 0.60 100% 25% Does Silage Seepage Drain to Storage Facility? (YIN) N0 January 13.09 0.48 100% 25% Total Runoff Area Contributing to Liquid Storage 5,600 February- 10.79 0.78 100% 25% March 9.90 1.26 100% 15% WATER USE TI-IAT ENTERS LIQUID STORAGE FACILITY April 6.81 1.90 100% 15% umber "f Gallons of Total Water Total Water 4'84 3'22 100% 10% Number of per Water Used [?59 per Day, Use per Day, June 3.41 3.4-0 100% [00/31 Type of W'ater Ifse Animals Day per Wash-Day Gallons (Tuhic l-I?eet July 1.64 3.91 100% 0% Animal Washwatcr 1090 2 2.00 4360 582.9 August 1.42 3.52 100% 10% ui meat Wash 2 750.00 1500 200.5 September 3.68 2.54 100% 150/}: Flusbwater 0 0.00 0 0.0 Annual 90.39 23.78 Miscellaneous 2 25.00 50 6.7 59 10 790_ 1 CROP DATA Percent Nutrients Removed in Pounds per Acre Dry Matter Nitrogen Phosphorous Potassium Field Number Acres Crop (DM) Yield Units Target Yield P205 K30 Fairview Acres 145.8 Perennial Hay/PastureiMEd-High '?tenSi?Q/i 100% Tom 6.00 348 1 10 289 Bohern Harm 108.3 Perennial Hany?stureiMEd-High '"tensI'WJ 100% Too 6.00 348 110 289 Little Dairy 67.] Perennial IntEHSity] 100% Tom 6.00 348 110 289 Chad Acres 165.8 Perennial Hay/PastureiMEd-High 'ntenSiiyi 100% Tom 6.00 348 1 10 289 Ulher Owned 77.0 Per?nnia' ?931151119 100% Too 6.00 348 110 289 Leased 254.5 Perennial HEWPaStUreiMed'High Intensny] 100% Tom 6.00 348 110 289 Ewart 285.0 Perennial Intensity] Tom 6,00 343 I 10 239 Off Farm Total Acrcs- 1,103.5 Page 2 of3 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5?30 REFERENCES Section 5 OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) ??10?2014 Version 5.0 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Inc. 'l?om 'l?homson, NW Agricultural Consulting ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INVENTORY BEDDING VOLUME AmounL Total Toial Unit Weight Needed Volume Volume Weight Type 01' Animal Type oI'Bedding Facility Lbstayr?AU Lbstay MILKHR (Hoistein) Free Stall 36.00 0.00 0.00 0 MILKER (DRY) Free Sta? 7.00 2.70 80 55?) TIEIFERS (12?24 Months) Free 2.50 2.04 0.82 274 683 CALVES [1-12 Months) 2.50 25.00 10.00 512 1.279 SOLIDS SEPARATION FACTOR Volume of Volume of Volume 01? Volume of Accumulated Density of Weight 01? Solids Solids in Manure in Manure in Sludge in Separated Separated Solids Separated Liquids Liquids Solids Storage Solids Solids Tvpe of Animal Type of Separator Separated CF {Dav Lbs/Dav MILKER (Holstein) Dry Scrape System 50% 1,284 1,284 1,284 12 84 744 36 46,217 MILKER (DRY) Dry Scrape SYStem 50% 13:3 135 95 95 23 36 4,870 IIEIFERS (12724 Months) Scrape System 5010,361 CALVI-LS l- 2 Months) DUI Scrape System 100% 580 0 69 0 36 20,881 'l?otal 23287 .707 1,530 1,598 828 82,329 Page 3 of 3 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5?31 Section 5 REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) ?00/2014 Version 5.0 CLIENT: Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Inc. ASSISTED 13?1" Tom Thomson, Agricultural Consulting ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRODUCTION VOLUMES Runoff in Cubic Feet Paved Unpaved Silage Pit Roof Area Slab Area Lot Area Surface Facility Manure 'l?otal Square Feet Square Feet Square Feet Area, SF Water Use Solids liquids Bedding Solids Separated Solids in liquids Solids 'l?otal Liquids Month 0 5,600 0 0 Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Pounds Cubic Feet Pounds Cubic Feet Pounds Cubic Feet Cubic Feet October 0 3,341 0 0 24,493 7,512 51,222 14,638 39,357 43429 1.563.456 29.943 1.077.961 43.429 57,778 November 0 6,398 0 0 23,703 12,100 81, 33 25,975 75,020 08,007 2,409,807 51,200 1,843,423 68,607 81,307 December 0 6,505 0 0 24,493 12,510 84,457 26,841 78,147 70,894 2,552,196 52,913 1,904,870 70,894 83,912 January 0 0,109 0 0 24,493 2,510 84,457 26,841 78,147 70,894 2,552,190 52,913 1,904,870 70,894 83,515 February 0 5,035 0 0 22,123 '1 '1 ,299 76,284 24,243 70,585 64,034 2,305,209 47,792 1,720,528 64,034 74,951 March 0 4,020 0 0 24,493 9,078 05,709 18,177 50,900 53,975 1,943,094 39,590 1,425,234 53,975 08,703 April 0 3, 78 0 0 23,703 7,270 49,570 14,166 38,088 42,028 1,513,022 28,977 1,043,188 42,028 55,859 May 0 2,259 0 0 24,493 7,512 51,222 14,638 39,357 43,429 1,563,456 29,943 1,077,961 43,429 56,695 June 0 1,591 0 0 23,703 7,270 49,570 14,100 38,088 42.028 1,513,022 28,977 1,043,188 42,028 54,272 July 0 765 0 0 24,493 7,512 51,222 14.638 39.357 43.429 1,563.456 29,943 1,077.961 43,429 55,202 August 0 663 0 0 24,493 7,512 51,222 14,638 39,357 43.429 1,563.456 29,943 1,077.961 43,429 55,099 September 0 1,717 0 0 23,703 7,270 49,570 14,166 38,088 42,028 1,513,022 28,977 1,043,188 42,028 54,398 A ual 0 42,182 11 0 288,389 109,901 740,237 223,130 025,104 028,207 22,015.450 451,120 10,240,335 028,207 781,091 A ual Gallons 0 .11 5,521 0 0 2,157,150 822,508 5.581.849 1,009,012 4,098,988 3,3 74,381 4.0 98,988 5,847,052 DAILY NUTRIENT PRODUCTION Pounds/ Day of utricnts from Pounds/Day of Nutrients from of Nutrients from Grazing Confined LIQUIDS SOLIDS Manure Manure Type of Animal P205 K20 P205 K20 P205 K20 Gallons/Yr Cubic MILKER (Holstein) 326.27 100.92 480.98 404.60 228.98 796.53 1,034.41 417.48 576.11 1,457,519 742,320 MILKER (DRY) 19.61 4.82 20.84 24.31 10.94 34.52 62.16 19.94 24.97 250,953 36,028 HEIFERS (12-24 Months) 2808 8.43 40.40 34.82 19.13 66.90 89.02 34.88 48.39 396,504 56,924 CALVES [1-12 Months) 0 00 0.00 0.00 16.81 6.94 18.75 21.48 6.33 6.78 30,607 20,926 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total- 2,135,583 856.197 Page 1 of Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5?32 Section 5 REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) ??10?2014 Version 5.0 CLIENT. Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Inc. ASSISTED BY: Tom Thomson. NW Agricultural Consulting ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRODUCTION NUTRIENT PRODUCTION Pounds of Nutrtents From Pounds of Nutrients from Pounds of Nutrients from Total Pounds 01? Nutrients from SOLIDS GRAZING ALL Month P205 K20 P205 K20 P205 K20 P205 K20 October 7,146 2,199 10,465 9,253 5,150 17.766 14,263 5,594 7,652 30.662 12,944 35,882 November 1 1,219 3.425 16,267 14.416 7,980 27.501 0 0 0 25,635 1 1,405 43,768 December 1 1,593 3,539 16,809 14,897 8,246 28,418 0 0 0 26,489 1 1.785 45,227 Januarv 11,593 3,539 16,809 14.897 8.246 28.418 0 0 0 26,489 11.785 45,227 Februarv 10,471 3,197 15,182 13,455 7.448 25,668 0 0 0 23,926 10,645 40,850 March 9,134 2,802 13,325 1 1,744 6.530 22,532 7,928 3,089 4,215 28,806 12,421 40,072 Apl?11 6.916 2,128 10.127 8.954 4.984 17,193 13.803 5,414 7.405 29,673 12,526 34,725 Maw 7,146 2,199 10,465 9,253 5,150 17,766 14,263 5,594 7,652 30,662 12,944 35,882 June 6,916 2,128 10,127 8,954 4,984 17.193 13,803 5,414 7,405 29.673 12.526 34.725 .111 IV 7,146 2.199 10,465 9.253 5,150 17.766 14.263 5,594 7.652 30.662 12.944 35.882 August 7,146 2,199 10,465 9253 5.15.0 17,766 14,263 5,594 7,652 30,662 12.944 35.882 September 6,916 2,128 10,127 8,954 4.984 17,193 13,803 5,414 7,405 29,673 12,526 34,725 Annual 103,341 31,683 150,631 133,280 74,003 255,177 106,391 41,709 57,036 343,012 147,394 462,845 Page 2 1112 Fairview Acres Dairtlr Farm Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5?33 REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) Version 5.0 CLIENT Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Inc. ASSISTED BY. Tom Thomson, NW Agricultural Consulting ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM STORAGE SOLIDS STACKING VOLUME SOLIDS IN ?l?lf?i 012014 1 Stock Height, 11 I 0 Feet Wall Height, 0 lleet Length, 0 Feet Solids Solids Normal Number Manure Bedding 1o Store Lo Store Runoff Solids Storaee Faei1iw Parameters Value Month of Dave; CF CF CF Tons CF Storage Period. Davs= 108 October 31 30.164 13.265 21.715 T82 0 Stacking Width. in Feet: 0 November 30 47,947 20,660 34,304 L235 Stacking in Feei= 0.00 December 31 49.546 21,349 35.447 .276 0 Wall Height. 11 in Feet: 0.00 January 3] 49,546 2 .349 35,447 L276 0 Stock Side Slope (X21): 0.00 Februarv 28 44.751 19,283 32.017 1,153 0 Existing Storage. Cubic Feet: 124,530 March 3] 38.544 I5,43l 26.987 973 0 Surface Area of Existing Storage= SF: ii April 30 29.191 12.837 21,014 7'57 0 25 Year?24 Hour Storm Runoff. C11: 0 May 31 30.164 13.265 21.715 782 0 Volume Needed, Cubic Feet: 124,408 June 30 29,191 12,837 21 ,[1'14 757 0 Design Volume. Cubic Fem: 0 Julv 31 30.164 13.265 21.715 782 0 15 Facility Covered? NO August 31 30.164 13,265 21.715 782 0 Volume Reduction Factor: September 30 29, 91 757 Annual 365 438,562 189,645 314.103 11.308 0 Width, Feet Storage Period 2 108 Days Volume of Solids to Store 124408 Cubic Feet Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5?34 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Section 5 Section 5 REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) ??10?2014 Version 5.0 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Inc. ASSISTED BY: Tom Thomson, NW Agricultural Consulting ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM STORAGE TANK INTO TANK um Rain?L?vap Rain?L?vap urinal Waste Waste ct?days on Tank on Existing Runo?? Washwater Solids to Store to Store Tank Parameters Value Month CF Storage, CF CF CF CF CF Gallons Storage Period Days= 88 October 3 0 4,869 3 341 24.493 29.943 62.647 468,636 Tank Diameter, Feet: 1} November 31} ?1,994 6,398 23,703 5 ,206 92,302 690,465 December 31 0 11,317 6,505 24,493 52,913 95228 712.359 Existing Storage, Cubic Feet: 284,553 January 3 0 10,697 6, 09 24,493 52,913 94,213 704,759 Surface Area of Existi rig Storage, SF: 10,180 Februarv 28 0 8.492 5,035 22,123 47,792 83,443 624, 94 25 Year-24 IIour Storm Runoff. CF: 2,524 March 31 0 7,330 4,620 24,493 39,590 76,033 568.764 Volume Needed, Cubic Feet: 283,075 April 30 0 4,165 3, 78 23,703 28.97? 60,024 449,01 1 Design Vehlme, Cubic Feet: 0 Mai: 3 0 1,374 2,259 24,493 29,943 58,070 434,391 Is Tank Covered? N0 June 30 0 8 1,591 23,703 28,977 54,280 406.046 'l?ank Dimcnsions?? .I uly 3 0 ,926 765 24.493 29.943 53.276 398,5 34 August 3 1} - ,782 663 24,493 29,943 53,3 8 398,845 September 30 0 967 1,717 23,703 28,977 55.365 414.160 Annual 365 1) 56,507 42, 82 288,389 45 1 2'0 838,199 6,270,164 1.0 Feet Minimum reeboard 1.0 Feet 25Yr?241-Ir Storm Precipitation 2 6 Inches 25Yr-24 Hr Storm Runoff: 2524 Cubic Feet 88 Day Precip - Evap 33117 Inches Runoff from Normal Precipitation 18604 Cubic Feet Washwater 71056 Cubic Feet Depth 0 Feet Manure 137571 Cubic Feet Diameter 0 Feet4>i Fairview Acres Dairy Farm ORAWMV5.0.XIS Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5?35 Section 5 REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) ??10?2014 Version 5.0 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Inc. ASSISTED BY: Tom Thomson, NW Agricultural Consulting ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UTILIZATION AVAILABLE AFTER STORAGE Type of Operation Pounds of Percent Nutrients Retained Pounds ofNutrients Nutrient 06"";r Nutrients Available Alter Storage Retained A?er Storage Source I Type of Storage Facility P205 K20 P205 K20 P205 K20 Liquids Tank Manure Ana'vsis 103.311 31.083 150.031 70% 35% 85% 72.339 20.930 123.037 Solids Solids Storage Manure malts-S 133.280 31.003 255.1 77 75% 90% 90% 99.060 05,502 220.660 Grazing 106,391 41,100 37,035 100% 100% 100% 106.301 41 ,100 51036 NUTRIENTS AVAILABLE AFTER APPLICATION Pounds of Percent Nutrients Retained Pounds ul?Nutrienls Nutrient Nutrients Available After Application Retained Alter Application Source Tvpe of Application System P205 K20 P205 K20 P205 K20 Liquids Srrink'ing 73.339 20.930 138.037 75% 100% 100% 54.254 20.930 123.037 Solids Broadcast [incorporated or more days after application) 99.900 66.602 229.000 70% 100% 100% 69.01: 00,503 229.0011 Grazing szm9 106.391 41.100 57,035 515% 100% 100% 90.432 41,100 31.036 NUTRIENTS AVAILABLE AFTER DENITRIFICATION Location Pounds of Percent Nutrients Retained Pounds ul?Nuirienls Nutrient Nutrients Available After Denitri?cation Retained After Denitri?cation Source Soil Drainage Clara J5 K20 P205 KZC P205 K20 Liquids Moderately We" Dwined 54,254 26,930 128,03? 32% 100% 100% 44.433 26,930 123.03.? Solids Moderately We" Draim?d 693?: 66.602 229,660 32 100% 100% 57.31 55.60: 229,660 Grazing Moderately Well Drains-d 011.132 11.709 51.035 112% 100% 100% $1.155 41,?09 51.1136 TOTAL- 176,020 135,242 414,733 Page 1 of 2 Fairview Acres Dairy Farm Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5-36 CLIENT: Fain-'iew Acres Dair}r Farm Inc. ASSISTED BY: Tom Thomson. NW Agricultural Consulting REFERENCES OREGON ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DESIGN AID (ORAWM) Version 5.0 ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UTILIZATION Fairview Acres Dairy Farm PERCENT MANURE TO BE APPLIED TO FIELD AND UTILIZATION ACRES NEEDED BASED ON I NHROGEN- 7' LIQUIDS SOLIDS GRAZING Pounds Acres Pounds Acres Pounds Acres Percent of utrients Need ed for Percent of Nutrients Needed for Percent of Nutrients Needed for Field to be to be Utilization to be to be Utilization to be to be Utilization Number Acres Crop Applied Applied of Nutrients Applied Applied of Nutrients Applied Applied of Nutrients Acres 1-15. 8 Perennial Hanyasttnel' Intensitv) 13% 5.8 T8 1 13% 3,581 22 13 9. T98 38 Bohern Farm 1083 Perennial Huy.?PastureLMed?High Intensitvl 10% 4.366 13. 10% 5.631 16 10% 7 ,278 21 little Daiw 6.7.1 Perennial Tntenaitv) 6% 2,705 8 6% 3,189 10 6% 4,509 13 Chad Acres 1 65.8 Perennial HanyasturetMed?Higl'l Intensitvl 15% 6.684 19 15% 8.621 Owned T0 Perennial Mcd-iligh anensilv ,1 7% 04 9 7% 4,004 I 7% 5,l it I 5 Leased 254. 5 Perennial +11le Lntensityl 23% 1 0.260 29 25% 1 3.233 Export 285 0 Perennial IIayFPaleueIMed-Higll Intensilvl 26% 1 1.490 33 26% 14.819 43 26% 19,152 55 Off Farm TALS- 1 103. 5 100% 44,483 128 100% 57,3 ?77 165 100% 74,155 2 13 NUTRIENT BALANCE BASED ON AVAILABLE ACRES - RENIOVED NUTRIENT BALANCE Nitrogen. Phospliuruus. Potassium, Nitrogen. Phosphorous. Potassium, Nitrogen, Potassium, Field P205 K20 P205 K20 P205 K20 Number Acres Crop LbslAcre LbsrAcre LbslAcre LbsrAcre LbsrAcre LbslAcre LbslAcre LbsrAcre Fain-'iew Acres 145 8 Perennial HunyaslureLMed?High Intensilvl 160 123 376 348 1 10 289 ?188 13 8 7 Bohem Farm 108.3 Perennial Hanyasttn'cl?Mcd?High intensitv) 160 1 23 3?6 3-18 1 10 289 ?188 13 8? Little Dairv 67.1 Perennial Hay??asturetMed ?High Intensitvl 160 Chad Acres 1 65.8 Perennial TlanyastInechd-iligjt 1611 1?U?ler Owned 3.7.0 Perennial Hayfl?astureth-Ied ?1-Iigh Jntensityl 100 1 23 3?:Leased 254 5 Perennial hitensilvl 160 123 376 3-18 1 10 289 -188 13 8? Export 285.0 Perennial l-IanyasturetMed?High Lntensity] 160 123 BTG 3-18 1 10 289 ?188 13 8? Off Farm Page 2 of 2 FairVIew Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5?37 Section 5 REFERENCES Fairview Acres Dairy Farm AWMP Page 5?38