Board Members Ron Roberts, Chair Chair, County of San Diego Terry Sinnott, First Vice Chair Deputy Mayor, Del Mar Matt Hall Mayor, Carlsbad Mary Salas Mayor, Chula Vista Carrie Downey Councilmember, Coronado Bill Wells Mayor, El Cajon Lisa Shaffer Deputy Mayor, Encinitas Sam Abed Mayor, Escondido Serge Dedina Mayor, Imperial Beach Kristine Alessio Councilmember, La Mesa Mary Teresa Sessom Mayor, Lemon Grove BOARD OF DIRECTORS SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA Friday, April 29, 2016 9 a.m. to 12 noon SANDAG Board Room 401 B Street, 7th Floor San Diego Ron Morrison Mayor, National City Jim Wood Mayor, Oceanside Steve Vaus Mayor, Poway Kevin Faulconer Mayor, City of San Diego Todd Gloria Councilmember, City of San Diego Jack Dale Councilmember, Santee Jim Desmond Mayor, San Marcos AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS • POTENTIAL FUNDING MEASURE: PREPARATION FOR NOVEMBER 2016 BALLOT Lesa Heebner Councilmember, Solana Beach Judy Ritter Mayor, Vista Dianne Jacob Vice Chair, County of San Diego Advisory Members Hon. John Renison Supervisor, District 1 Imperial County Malcolm Dougherty, Director California Department of Transportation Harry Mathis, Chair Metropolitan Transit System Mark Packard, Chair North County Transit District CAPT John J. Adametz, CEC, USN, CO, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest U.S. Department of Defense Garry Bonelli, Commissioner San Diego Unified Port District Mark Muir, Vice Chair San Diego County Water Authority Allen Lawson, Chairman Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association Remedios Gómez-Arnau Consul General of Mexico Gary L. Gallegos Executive Director, SANDAG PLEASE SILENCE ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES DURING THE MEETING YOU CAN LISTEN TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING BY VISITING OUR WEBSITE AT SANDAG.ORG MESSAGE FROM THE CLERK In compliance with Government Code §54952.3, the Clerk hereby announces that the compensation for legislative body members attending the following simultaneous or serial meetings is: Executive Committee (EC) $100, Board of Directors (BOD) $150, and Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) $100. Compensation rates for the EC and BOD are set pursuant to the SANDAG Bylaws and the compensation rate for the RTC is set pursuant to state law. MISSION STATEMENT The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional decision-making. SANDAG builds consensus, makes strategic plans, obtains and allocates resources, plans, engineers, and builds public transit, and provides information on a broad range of topics pertinent to the region's quality of life. San Diego Association of Governments ⋅ 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101-4231 (619) 699-1900 ⋅ Fax (619) 699-1905 ⋅ sandag.org Welcome to SANDAG. Members of the public may speak to the Board of Directors on any item at the time the Board is considering the item. Please complete a Speaker’s Slip, which is located in the rear of the room, and then present the slip to the Clerk of the Board seated at the front table. Members of the public may address the Board on any issue under the agenda item entitled Public Comments/Communications/Member Comments. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. The Board of Directors may take action on any item appearing on the agenda. Public comments regarding the agenda can be sent to SANDAG via comment@sandag.org. Please include the agenda item, your name, and your organization. Email comments should be received no later than 12 noon, two working days prior to the Board of Directors meeting. Any handouts, presentations, or other materials from the public intended for distribution at the Board of Directors meeting should be received by the Clerk of the Board no later than 12 noon, two working days prior to the meeting. In order to keep the public informed in an efficient manner and facilitate public participation, SANDAG also provides access to all agenda and meeting materials online at www.sandag.org/meetings. Additionally, interested persons can sign up for e-notifications via our e-distribution list at either the SANDAG website or by sending an email request to webmaster@sandag.org. SANDAG operates its programs without regard to race, color, and national origin in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. SANDAG has developed procedures for investigating and tracking Title VI complaints and the procedures for filing a complaint are available to the public upon request. Questions concerning SANDAG nondiscrimination obligations or complaint procedures should be directed to SANDAG General Counsel, John Kirk, at (619) 699-1997 or john.kirk@sandag.org. Any person who believes himself or herself or any specific class of persons to be subjected to discrimination prohibited by Title VI also may file a written complaint with the Federal Transit Administration. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900, (619) 699-1904 (TTY), or fax (619) 699-1905. SANDAG agenda materials can be made available in alternative languages. To make a request call (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Los materiales de la agenda de SANDAG están disponibles en otros idiomas. Para hacer una solicitud, llame al (619) 699-1900 al menos 72 horas antes de la reunión. 如有需要, 我们可以把SANDAG议程材料翻译成其他語言. 请在会议前至少 72 小时打电话 (619) 699-1900 提出请求. SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone 511 or see 511sd.com for route information. Bicycle parking is available in the parking garage of the SANDAG offices. 2 Rev. 022315 BOARD OF DIRECTORS SPECIAL MEETING Friday, April 29, 2016 ITEM NO. 1. RECOMMENDATION PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS Public comments under this agenda item will be limited to five public speakers. Members of the public shall have the opportunity to address the Board on any issue within the jurisdiction of SANDAG that is not on this agenda. Other public comments will be heard during the items under the heading “Reports.” Anyone desiring to speak shall reserve time by completing a “Request to Speak” form and giving it to the Clerk of the Board prior to speaking. Public speakers should notify the Clerk of the Board if they have a handout for distribution to Board members. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. Board members also may provide information and announcements under this agenda item. REPORTS +2. POTENTIAL FUNDING MEASURE: PREPARATION FOR NOVEMBER 2016 BALLOT* (Rob Rundle) APPROVE The Board of Directors has been considering information related to a potential new regional funding source and discussed multiple draft Expenditure Plan options. The Board of Directors is asked to: 1) approve the development of a funding measure to be placed on the November 2016 ballot; and 2) direct staff to prepare an Expenditure Plan, the Ordinance implementing the Expenditure Plan, ballot language, and all other necessary documentation for review and approval by the Board of Directors. 3. UPCOMING MEETINGS INFORMATION The next Board Policy meeting is scheduled for Friday, May 13, 2016, at 10 a.m. 4. CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS If the five speaker limit for public comments was exceeded at the beginning of this agenda, other public comments will be taken at this time. Subjects of previous agenda items may not again be addressed under public comment. 5. ADJOURNMENT + next to an agenda item indicates an attachment * next to an agenda item indicates that the Board of Directors also is acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission for that item 3 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. 16-04BOARD OF DIRECTORS APRIL 29, 2016 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE POTENTIAL FUNDING MEASURE: PREPARATION FOR NOVEMBER 2016 BALLOT File Number 3200000 Introduction Recommendation Over the past several months, the Board of Directors has been discussing the possibility of placing a funding measure on the November 2016 ballot. The Board has been soliciting public input and providing feedback on what should be included in a potential Expenditure Plan and has provided direction on what could be included in an ordinance to implement the Expenditure Plan. The Board of Directors is asked to: 1) approve the development of a funding measure to be placed on the November 2016 ballot; and 2) direct staff to prepare an Expenditure Plan, the Ordinance implementing the Expenditure Plan, ballot language, and all other necessary documentation for review and approval by the Board of Directors. Discussion When the TransNet Extension Ordinance passed in 2004, it included a provision that requires the Board of Directors to, “act on additional regional funding measures (a ballot measure or other secure funding commitments) to meet the long-term requirements for implementing habitat conservation plans in the San Diego region, within the timeframe necessary to allow a ballot measure to be considered by the voters no later than four years after passage of the TransNet Extension.” Due to economic and other factors, the Board has amended the TransNet Ordinance three times (May 23, 2008; November 20, 2009; and March 23, 2012) to extend the deadline for meeting this obligation. Currently, the TransNet Ordinance deadline for meeting this provision is November 2016. Over the years, the Board of Directors has discussed a potential funding measure at its annual retreats, considered public and stakeholder input regarding potential investments in regional infrastructure, and conducted public opinion research to determine the likely success of a potential measure. In 2015, two public information surveys were conducted to gauge potential voter sentiment for a potential funding measure. While the results significantly improved from a survey conducted in 2011, support still fell short of the two-thirds approval threshold necessary to pass. Draft Expenditure Plans In February 2016 the Board was presented with two alternative draft expenditure plans that took different approaches to infrastructure investments in the region. Option A invested 60 percent of the funding to specific regional projects and programs, and allocated 40 percent of the funding to local jurisdictions to spend on their project priorities (within SANDAG legislative authority for how tax revenues can be spent). Option B allocated 100 percent of the funding to specific projects and programs throughout the region. While a greater number of projects important to local jurisdictions were included in Option B, it did not leave any funding for local jurisdiction discretion. Based on input from the Board of Directors, it was recommended that a hybrid of the two options be presented at the Board’s annual retreat. At the Board Retreat in March, staff presented a Hybrid Alternative Expenditure Plan that allocated approximately 79 percent of the funding to regional projects and programs and 21 percent to local agencies for their priority projects. The Board members received public input and discussed aspects of the Hybrid Alternative that they liked and other aspects they wanted changed. On March 25, 2016, staff incorporated modifications based on the issues that were raised and presented a Refined Hybrid Alternative Expenditure Plan. This version of the Expenditure Plan increased local funding to 30 percent and distributed the remainder to specific regional projects and programs. A subsequent public information survey was conducted. At its April 8, 2016, meeting, the Board of Directors heard the results of the public information survey that was conducted to gauge public interest in a potential funding measure and test certain components included in the Refined Hybrid Alternative. The survey results indicated that support for a potential funding measure met the two-thirds voter threshold. Issues Discussed by Board of Directors At its April 22, 2016, meeting, the Board discussed further refinements to the Expenditure Plan (Attachment 1) and began discussing certain provisions of a draft ordinance that would implement the Expenditure Plan (Attachment 2). The Board of Directors raised several items for consideration that are noted below. Transit Funding The North County Transit District (NCTD) and some Board members reiterated support for allocating the regional transit capital funding based on a 70/30 split (70 percent allocated to the Metropolitan Transit System [MTS] and 30 percent to NCTD). MTS does not support that formula. It was stated that North County was not receiving an equitable share of overall transit funding from the proposed regional measure. It should be noted that the funding distribution in the draft Expenditure Plan is based on priorities (transit and Managed Lanes/highways) identified by the public, the Board of Directors, and the transit operators for each area of the region. There is no shortfall for North County when expenditures in all of the program areas are taken into account. North Coast Corridor Investments Board members discussed the timing of building two additional Managed Lanes on Interstate 5 (I-5). Some supported assessing the need for an additional two lanes after rail improvements and the first two Managed Lanes are implemented while others favored moving forward with the additional lanes as soon as possible. Infrastructure improvements in the North Coast Corridor are subject to Senate Bill 468 (SB 468) (2011, Kehoe) and the North Coast Corridor Public Works Plan (PWP), which was approved unanimously by the California Coastal Commission in 2014. Pursuant to SB 468, the PWP outlines how and when transportation improvements can be implemented in the corridor and ensures that 2 highway improvements do not advance until certain rail, active transportation, and environmental improvements have been completed. The I-5 Managed Lanes project included in the Priority Corridors Program meets the requirements of SB 468 and reflects the phasing that was approved as part of the PWP. The additional Managed Lanes would be constructed after the first two High Occupancy Vehicle lanes are extended (Manchester to State Route 78), which would occur no earlier than 2020, in accordance with the PWP State Route 94 It was requested that the State Route 94 (SR 94) project be re-characterized in the Expenditure Plan to reflect that the eventual improvements are still contingent upon environmental review and future decisions. As part of the draft Ordinance language to be presented at the May 13, 2016, Board meeting, text will be included that clarifies the process for decisions on future improvements in that corridor. In addition, the SR 94 project is proposed to be identified as “State Route 94 Corridor Improvements” to more accurately represent the deliberative nature of its development. Rail-Grade Separation Program The Board of Directors reiterated the importance of rail-grade separation projects, which have a proposed funding allocation of 5 percent ($900 million) in the draft Expenditure Plan. It was suggested that match requirements be reduced and pedestrian grade separation projects be made eligible for funding under this category as well. Funding in the draft Expenditure Plan would pay for approximately 50 percent of the total cost of all grade separation projects outlined in San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan. Reducing the match requirement would further constrain available funding. Because pedestrian grade separation projects may not compete as well against projects that separate multiple modes from rail, staff suggests that pedestrian grade separation projects be made eligible under the Active Transportation funding category (3 percent of the draft Expenditure Plan) as part of the Ordinance language to be considered at the next Board of Directors meeting. Priority Corridors Program The Board of Directors commented on the Del Mar Fairgrounds Station and double tracking at San Dieguito Bridge. As shown in Attachment 2, this project now is identified within the Priority Corridors Program. Finally, the Board requested to see what the funding levels for the Local Infrastructure Fund would be if the Rail Grade Separation and Traffic Signal Synchronization Program funding were eliminated (increasing the formula share of Local Infrastructure from 24 percent to 30 percent of the measure). This information can be found in Attachment 3. Next Steps Pending action by the Board to move forward with the development of a funding measure, staff would return to the Board of Directors over the next two months to discuss and seek direction on the following: • May 13 Board Policy Meeting – Discuss draft ballot and Ordinance language implementing the Expenditure Plan 3 • May 27 Board Business Meeting – Present final ballot and Ordinance language for action by the Board • June 10 Board Policy Meeting – First reading of Ordinance • June 24 Board Business Meeting – Second reading/Present Ordinance and supporting documentation for adoption by the Board After the Ordinance is adopted by the Board, staff would submit all necessary materials to the County Board of Supervisors for inclusion on the November 2016 ballot. GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director Attachments: 1. Potential Funding Measure Expenditure Plan 2. Key Provisions of Draft Ordinance implementing the Expenditure Plan 3. Estimate of Increased Local Share for Funding Measure Key Staff Contact: Rob Rundle, (619) 699-6949; rob.rundle@sandag.org 4 Attachment 1 Potential Funding Measure Expenditure Plan Amount (Millions of 2015$) Total Revenues Available Percent $18,194 Off the top: Administration Independent Oversight $182 $10 Subtotal $192 Net Revenues 1% Fixed $18,002 Distribution of Net Revenues Active Transportation Open Space Highways and GP Connectors Managed Lanes, HOV Lanes and HOV Connectors Transit Capital and Operations - Transit Capital Projects ($4,785), (26.6%) - Transit Operations ($2,182), (12.1%) - Specialized Transit Grants ($540), (3%) Local Infrastructure - Formula Funds ($4,322), (24%) - Arterial Traffic Signal Synchronization ($178), (1%) - Rail / Local Road Grade Separation Grant Program ($900), (5%) Total 5 $540 $2,000 $615 $1,940 $7,507 3% 11.1% 3.4% 10.8% 41.7% $5,400 30% $18,002 100% New or Expanded Transit - Capital TransNet II Plan of Finance RTP Cost Capacity Net Need Proposed (2014 Cost (2015 (2015 (2015 (2015 $millions) $millions) $millions) $millions) $millions) Route Description Purple Line Phase 1 Rapid 2 Rapid 10 Rapid 11 Rapid 28 Rapid 30 Rapid 41 San Ysidro to Kearny Mesa North Park to Downtown La Mesa to Ocean Beach Spring Valley to SDSU via Downtown Pt Loma to Kearny Mesa via Old Town Old Town to Sorrento Mesa via Beaches Fashion Valley to UTC via Linda Vista Rapid 90 SR 94 Corridor Express Service: El Cajon Transit Ctr to SD Airport via Downtown Rapid Rapid Rapid Rapid 120 550 635 638 Rapid 640A/B Rapid 870/890 First/Last Mile Transit Connections SR 94 Centerline Station Sorrento Valley Station Airport ITC San Ysidro ITC Downtown to Kearny Mesa SDSU to Palomar Station via Southeast Eastlake to Palomar Trolley Iris Trolley to Otay Mesa South I-5 Corridor Rapid Express Services: San Ysidro to Old Town via Downtown San Diego/Iris to Kearny Mesa via Downtown San Diego SR 52 Corridor Rapid Express Services: El Cajon/Santee to Kearny Mesa and UTC/Sorrento Mesa Mobility Hubs, transportation network connections Transit station near 27th Street Relocation and Grade separation Intermodal connections to airport Phases 1 and 2 $2,800 $20 $87 $65 $12 $53 $55 $4,400 $20 $89 $66 $12 $54 $56 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,400 $20 $89 $66 $12 $54 $56 $4,400 $20 $89 $66 $12 $54 $56 $20 $20 $0 $20 $20 $78 $59 $56 $10 $80 $60 $57 $10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80 $60 $57 $10 $80 $60 $57 $10 $93 $95 $0 $95 $95 $19 $19 $0 $19 $19 $1,279 $1,305 $0 $1,305 $180 $50 $242 $337 $118 $51 $247 $343 $120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $51 $247 $343 $120 $51 $247 $343 $120 Technology Enhancements Transit priority measures, fare and customer service system upgrades $118 $120 $0 $120 $120 LOSSAN - Double Tracking Various locations $318 $324 $0 $324 $324 COASTER - Stations Camp Pendleton, Fairgrounds (incl. San Dieguito River Bridge Double Track) $207 $211 $0 $211 $211 $79 $81 $0 $81 $81 $60 $60 $0 $60 $60 COASTER COASTER COASTER & SPRINTER Regional Transit Station Parking Regional Vehicle Replacement Regional Vehicle Replacement Regional Enhanced Bus Services State of Good Repair improvements, including Del Mar Bluffs stabilization and bridge replacement Quiet Zones Vehicle Replacement to support COASTER, SPRINTER and Feeder Bus Service Expanded transit station parking Replacement of rail vehicles New BRT and bus vehicle replacement Expansion of bus maintenance facilities $133 $136 $0 $136 $136 $120 $294 $100 $100 $6,980 $120 $300 $100 $100 $8,656 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120 $300 $100 $100 $8,656 $120 $300 $100 $100 $7,531 Matching Funds Total Sales Tax Needed $3,725 $3,807 Financing Cost Attributable to Transit Total Capital + Financing Costs 6 $978 $9,634 $978 $4,785 New or Expanded Transit - Operations Annual Fare Annual Annual Subsidy Operating Recovery (2015 Cost (2015 (2015 $millions) $millions) $millions) Proposed (2015 $millions)* New Transit Services - Operations Purple Line Phase 1 Rapid 2 Rapid 10 Rapid 11 Rapid 28 Rapid 30 Rapid 41 Rapid 90 Rapid Rapid Rapid Rapid 120 550 635 638 Rapid 640A/B Rapid 870/890 San Ysidro to Kearny Mesa North Park to Downtown La Mesa to Ocean Beach Spring Valley to SDSU via Downtown Pt Loma to Kearny Mesa via Old Town Old Town to Sorrento Mesa via Beaches Fashion Valley to UTC via Linda Vista SR 94 Corridor Express Service: El Cajon Transit Ctr to SD Airport via Downtown Downtown to Kearny Mesa SDSU to Palomar Station via Southeast Eastlake to Palomar Trolley Iris Trolley to Otay Mesa South I-5 Corridor Rapid Express Services: San Ysidro to Old Town via Downtown San Diego/Iris to Kearny Mesa via Downtown San Diego SR 52 Corridor Rapid Express Services: El Cajon/Santee to Kearny Mesa and UTC/Sorrento Mesa First/Last Mile Transit Connections Mobility Hubs, transportation network connections Advanced Transit Services Funding to advance transit operations Total New Transit Services - Operations $21.2 $0.7 $4.5 $3.6 $1.3 $3.6 $3.3 $7.4 $0.2 $1.6 $1.3 $0.5 $1.3 $1.2 $13.8 $0.5 $2.9 $2.3 $0.8 $2.3 $2.1 $304.2 $10 $64.3 $51.5 $18.6 $51.5 $47.2 $0.6 $5.1 $5.3 $3 $2.3 $0.2 $1.8 $1.9 $1.1 $0.8 $0.4 $3.3 $3.4 $2.0 $1.5 $8.6 $72.9 $75.8 $42.9 $32.9 $2.1 $0.7 $1.4 $30 $2.4 $0.8 $1.6 $18.7 $3.9 $1.4 $2.5 $55.8 $500 $62.9 $22 $40.9 $1,384.8 $20 $4 $23.3 $7 $1.4 $8.2 $13 $2.6 $15.1 $350 $97.5 $350 $47.3 $16.6 $30.7 $797.5 Expanded Transit Operations Local Bus Services COASTER and SPRINTER Blue and Orange Lines Enhanced Bus Services Enhanced Rail Services Increased Frequencies Total Expanded Transit Operations *Assumed start dates are approximate and will depend on Board prioritization and ability to secure matching funds to implement advanced capital projects 7 Managed Lanes, HOV Lanes, and HOV Connectors Route TransNet II Plan of Finance Capacity Net Need Proposed RTP Cost (2015 (2015 (2015 (2014 Cost (2015 $millions) $millions) $millions) $millions) $millions) Description Managed Lanes and HOV Lanes I-5 I-5 I-5 SR 52 SR 78 SR 94 8F to 8F+2ML, SR 905 to SR 54 8F to 10F+2ML, SR 54 to SR 15 8F+2ML to 8F+4ML, SR 56 to SR 78 2ML from SR 125 to I-805 2HOV from I-5 to I-15 2HOV from I-5 to I-805 Corridor Improvements $308 $343 $1,531 $389 $1,192 $485 $4,248 $314 $350 $1,562 $397 $1,216 $500 $4,338 $169 $177 $713 $71 $566 $353 $2,049 $145 $173 $849 $326 $650 $147 $2,289 $145 $173 $849 $326 $650 $147 $2,289 $253 $106 $91 $71 $258 $108 $93 $100 $0 $71 $42 $48 $258 $37 $51 $52 $258 $37 $51 $52 Connectors - HOV I-5/SR 78 HOV Connectors I-15/SR 78 HOV Connectors SR 52/I-805 HOV Connector SR 94/SR 15 HOV Connectors SR 94/I-805 HOV Connectors (inc 805 Widening to accommodate) I-805/SR 15 HOV Connectors S to E, W to N, N to E, W to S East to South and North to West West to North and South to East South to West and East to North $101 $300 $0 $300 $300 $81 $703 $100 $959 $0 $161 $100 $798 $100 $798 $4,951 $5,297 $2,210 $3,087 $3,087 Match Sales Tax Need $396 Financing Costs Attributable to Managed Lanes, HOV Lanes, and HOV Connectors $1,544 $1,544 $396 North to West and East to South South to South and North to North Total Managed Lanes, HOV Lanes, and HOV Connectors Total Capital and Financing 8 $3,484 $1,940 Highways and General Purpose Lane Connectors Route TransNet II Plan of Finance RTP Cost Capacity Net Need Proposed (2014 Cost (2015 (2015 (2015 (2015 $millions) $millions) $millions) $millions) $millions) Description Highways I-8 SR 52 SR 56 SR 67 4F/6F to 6F from 2nd St to Los Coches 4F to 6F from Mast Blvd to SR 125 4F to 6F from I-5 to I-15 2C to 4C from Mapleview to Dye Road $35 $76 $141 $636 $888 $36 $78 $144 $649 $906 $32 $0 $114 $250 $396 $4 $78 $30 $399 $510 $4 $78 $30 $399 $510 $273 $273 $150 $696 $278 $278 $153 $710 $64 $64 $114 $242 $214 $214 $39 $468 $214 $214 $39 $468 $1,584 $1,616 $638 $978 $978 Match Sales Tax Need $489 $489 Financing Costs Attributable to Highways and General Purpose Lane Connectors $126 $126 Total Capital and Financing $1,103 $615 Connectors - General Purpose Lane I-5/SR 56 Connectors I-5/SR 78 Connectors SR 94/SR 125 Connectors West to North and South to East South to East and West to South South to East and West to North Total Highways and General Purpose Lane Connectors 9 Estimate of Local Share for Future Sales Tax Measure Jurisdiction Percent Share Carlsbad Chula Vista Coronado Del Mar El Cajon Encinitas Escondido Imperial Beach La Mesa Lemon Grove National City Oceanside Poway San Diego San Marcos Santee Solana Beach Vista County Total 40-year total 2017 - First Year (2015 $millions) Allocation ($thousands) 3.45% 7.96% 0.78% 0.19% 3.17% 1.95% 4.57% 0.88% 1.86% 0.86% 1.89% 5.32% 1.56% 41.95% 2.84% 1.77% 0.46% 3.01% $149.1 $344.1 $33.8 $8.3 $136.9 $84.1 $197.6 $38.1 $80.5 $37.4 $81.9 $229.9 $67.6 $1,812.9 $122.9 $76.5 $20.0 $130.3 $2,463 $5,684 $558 $137 $2,262 $1,389 $3,264 $630 $1,330 $617 $1,352 $3,798 $1,117 $29,951 $2,030 $1,264 $331 $2,152 15.50% 100.00% $670.0 $4,321.7 $11,070 $71,402 For comparison purposes, the TransNet Extension includes an estimated $76.7 million to local jurisdictions in FY 2017. The Future Sales Tax Measure FY 2017 estimate would represent an augmentation over and above what local cities and the county receive from TransNet in that year of: 10 93% Other Allocations Amount (2015 $millions) Off the Top Administration Independent Oversight Subtotal $182 $10 $192 Other Programs Active Transportation Open Space* Specialized Transit Grant Program Local Infrastructure - Rail Grade Separation Grant Program ($900) - Arterial Traffic Signal Synchronization Grant Program ($178) Subtotal $4,158 Total $4,350 $540 $2,000 $540 $1,078 *Assumes cost of acquisition, management and monitoring of habitat preserve areas to meet the regional obligation outlined in state/federal agreements 11 Attachment 2 Key Provisions of Draft Ordinance implementing the Expenditure Plan 1. PRIORITIZATION OF PROJECTS IN THE SANDAG PROGRAM OF PROJECTS (Priority Corridors Program): A. There is recognition that work on certain high priority projects needs to advance in order to provide better connections to regional job centers, provide transportation choices, and support economic/environmental opportunities for the San Diego region. These projects shall be part of the Priority Corridors Program and shall include: North Corridors • SR 78 Corridor: HOV/Managed Lanes and connectors • I-5 HOV/Managed Lanes; COASTER double tracking, including Fairgrounds Station and double tracking at San Dieguito Bridge; and state of good repair projects Central Corridors • SR 52 Corridor: HOV/Managed Lanes • Sorrento Valley COASTER Station relocation and rail grade separation • New Purple Line Trolley: Advance project development to compete for Federal Full Funding Grant Agreement. Construct as soon as the Federal Full Funding Grant Agreement has been secured • Orange Line Trolley service enhancements South Corridors • South Bay Rapid 640: Rapid Express Service from San Ysidro to Downtown, Old Town, and Kearny Mesa • South Bay Rapid 638: Rapid Express Service from Iris Trolley Station to Otay Mesa • Blue Line Trolley service enhancements • I-5 South Corridor: Managed Lanes to support Rapid Express Service East Corridors • SR 67 Corridor: widening/evacuation route improvements from Mapleview to Dye Road • I-8 Corridor: Improvements from 2nd Street to Los Coches • SR 94/SR125 Interchange: Missing Connectors 12 B. Following certification of passage of the Ordinance, the [Regional Transportation] Commission shall consider an initial Plan of Finance and budget actions necessary to commence work on the Priority Corridors Program. C. It is recognized that projects in the Priority Corridors Program are in various stages of project development and the Commission will make all efforts possible to advance all such projects to completion as expeditiously as possible. D. As Priority Corridors projects progress through the project development process, the Commission shall ensure that sufficient funding or bonding capacity remains available to fully implement the projects. E. All projects identified in the Priority Corridors Program shall be reviewed on a quarterly basis by the Commission to ensure all reasonable efforts are being made to advance the projects to completion. 2. LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PROGRAM (Eligible Uses): A. Twenty-four percent (24%) in Ordinance Net Revenues funding will be made available during the life of the Ordinance to fund implementation of local infrastructure programs and projects using the formula specified in this Section, to each city and the County of San Diego (hereinafter referred to as local agencies) to supplement other revenues available for those purposes. B. Examples of Eligible Uses for funding in the Local Infrastructure Projects Program include but are not limited to the following: 1. Transit: transit capital, operations and maintenance costs, including discounted youth pass programs; transit oriented development projects that offset developers’ costs and incentivize construction of housing near transit. 2. Habitat: acquisition, management, maintenance, and monitoring of natural habitat and open space; other projects that implement protection and preservation programs consistent with adopted natural community conservation plans and habitat conservation plans. 3. Roads: planning, construction, and maintenance of local streets and roads; traffic light synchronization projects; planning, construction, and maintenance of grade separations; planning, construction, and maintenance of active transportation projects such as sidewalks and bike paths; improvements to enhance accessibility to the transportation system by disabled persons; complete streets implementation. 4. Beach Sand: construction, maintenance, monitoring, and operation of beach sand replenishment projects. 5. Greenhouse Gas Reduction: preparation of Climate Action Plans (CAPs) and implementation of transportation-related greenhouse gas reduction and climate adaptation measures in CAPs; development and implementation of Transportation Demand Management projects; energy projects with a nexus to transportation such as 13 projects in the SANDAG Plug-in Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan or the readiness plan for alternative fuels, or other energy projects that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transportation projects. 6. Watershed Management: preparation and implementation of watershed management plans, which can include elements such as groundwater recharge projects, flood control projects, planning for urbanization and impervious surfaces, and removal of invasive species that interfere with the watershed; projects that capture, treat, and recycle or dispose of stormwater, or implement stormwater elements of transportation project. 14 Attachment 3 Estimate of Increased Local Share for Funding Measure Jurisdiction Percent Share Carlsbad Chula Vista Coronado Del Mar El Cajon Encinitas Escondido Imperial Beach La Mesa Lemon Grove National City Oceanside Poway San Diego San Marcos Santee Solana Beach Vista County Total 40-year total 2017 - First Year at 24% Allocation at 24% (2015 $millions) ($thousands) 40-year total 2017 - First Year at 30% Allocation at 30% (2015 $millions) ($thousands) 3.45% 7.96% 0.78% 0.19% 3.17% 1.95% 4.57% 0.88% 1.86% 0.86% 1.89% 5.32% 1.56% 41.95% 2.84% 1.77% 0.46% 3.01% $149.1 $344.1 $33.8 $8.3 $136.9 $84.1 $197.6 $38.1 $80.5 $37.4 $81.9 $229.9 $67.6 $1,812.9 $122.9 $76.5 $20.0 $130.3 $2,463 $5,684 $558 $137 $2,262 $1,389 $3,264 $630 $1,330 $617 $1,352 $3,798 $1,117 $29,951 $2,030 $1,264 $331 $2,152 $186.3 $429.8 $42.2 $10.4 $171.1 $105.1 $246.9 $47.6 $100.6 $46.7 $102.3 $287.2 $84.4 $2,265.6 $153.5 $95.6 $25.0 $162.7 $3,078 $7,102 $697 $171 $2,826 $1,736 $4,078 $787 $1,662 $771 $1,690 $4,745 $1,395 $37,420 $2,536 $1,580 $414 $2,689 15.50% 100.00% $670.0 $4,321.7 $11,070 $71,402 $837.1 $5,400.0 $13,830 $89,205 For comparison purposes, the TransNet Extension includes an estimated $76.7 million to local jurisdictions in FY 2017. The Future Sales Tax Measure FY 2017 estimate would represent an augmentation over and above what local cities and the county receive from TransNet in that year of 93% under the 24% option and 116% under 15