Page 1 of 5 Proposed Resting Court Celt Tower We, the undersigned people, ask that the proposed 85 foot cell tower to be erected by Central States Tower Verizon Wireless on the southeast portion of a property located at 2718 Meade Street in Appleton (tax parcel 311402500] he moved to an alternative site in the area that would be more appropriate and safer for the residents of the adjacent neighborhood We are concerned that the proposed site, which adjoins Kesting Court to the east, is immediately adjacent to a residential neighborhood where young families with small children live. We are concerned about the effects of the proposed tower location on neighborhood property values. We are very roncerned about the unknown risks to residents? health, especially for pregnant women and small children posed by high exposure to radiofrequency energy. Weare concerned that, in the event of a mechanical failure, all or some parts of the tower structure could actually fall on neighboring homes [the closest home is 38 feet from the actual center of the proposed site) We believe that there are alternative sites in the area that would be safer and more appropriate for a proposed cell tower and therefore request that an alternative site analysis be done to ?nd the safest and most apprOpriate site for this tower. Name Address Phone Number Signature Cat canola 23m can?? swan?arse WW caan Kali/mt (if 5936 *?739?125?6/0 were {a MW ?f 9/20/75?4f/z9? WW am we ear-raven team ?ee Maxie/720a gala fry-,4 n?a 37? are are row ?74% 0951;) (if 999cc: #731199333 33kt) ?fe?o? 7 59"- 1g7Pf/ghl?t 469757 e: dart 72975 We Egan ?aw-ma mwmmist 62mm at?! ?yr? A Lu? @0015 . Vw?kzp; gr storm/3761 6 AW. . gene A) {a deaf 23+ %Zoe%zwl (GA entitlement to (gemstones - Upfai Malay 252?! xv. Mrwl? art (0126?) new Marion (959%. weal? Si 0120' *a-rtl ?th 3 Page 2 of 5 Proposed Hosting Court Cell Tower We, the undersigned people, ask thatthe proposed 85 foot cell tower to be erected by Central States Towor Verizon Wireless on the southeast portion of a property located at 2718 Meade Street in Appleton [tax parcel 311402500] be moVed to an alternative site in the area that would be more appropriate and safer for the residents of the adj a cent neighborhood We are concerned that the proposed site, which adjoins Resting Court to the east, is immediately adjacent to a residential neighborhood where young families with small children live. We are concerned about the effects (if the proposed tower location on neighborhood property values. We are very concerned about the unknovm risks to residents? health, especially for pregnant women and small children posed by high exposure to radiofrequency energy. We are concern-ed that, in the event of a mechanical failure, all or some parts of the tower structure could actually fall on neighboring homes [the closest home is 38 feet from the actual center of the proposed site] We believe that there are alternative sites in the area that would be safer and more appropriate for a proposed. cell tower and therefore request that an alternative site analysis he done to ?nd the safest and most appropriate site for this tower. Name Address Phone Number Signature PM xx? flU/ljjejl? join em Magi Olga?gog?oga -- Ual.mwd/aa (lW?Oh ea) am:- ow ?9 - Rests Hawker; Parka \tzll . l" as of heelqu ?Dor?a?i?w?a? Wm Ill {new .n 960a U?ti??m 0i q80'8139655 Elam (??dws?l 119th (VJ L53 ?5.73% Sam. Bane.le Zola Keane c171 ?zonaeeosalr ?Ma/.7 1769/ Amen a ?Hat? D/aanr?a I 14/ 7? 7 GA %s2 ?Elm (0&1.ch w) a" team? 5+ no? 37?? Loss 5me [Lil/ff 12? 95,25? Met/(M 5? rife)? 5? . .. .. - nl?lfwt 35955 I {We 0+ 72o~?f527sws7 My?. Vilma? ?esta/HQ 259:1 New of Giza ?aware; Wei timed? . ZCNZ Lillsw Cali I I ?4 MW 770/3 Really/La {ji' 513?? {5503 17!} {6?3}ny 0+ 72,0on Nos {f 370% heater-m Ur qoo- Qm ?am We eel? a on?? twee Proposed Kesting Court Cell Tower We, the undersigned people, ask that the proposed 85 foot cell tower to be erected by Central States Tower Ill 81!. Verizon Wireless on the southeast portion ofa property located at 2718 Meade Street in Appleton [tax parcel 311402500) be mogved to an. alternative site in the area that would be more appropriate and safer for the residents of the adjacent neighborhood are concerned that the proposed site, which adjoins Kestng Court to the east, is immediately adjacent to a residential neighborhood where young families with small children live. We are concerned about the effects of the proposed tower location on neighborhood property values. We are very concerned about the unknOWn risks to residents? health, eSpecially for pregnant women and small children posed by high exposure to radiofrequency energy. We are concerned that, in the event of a mechanical failure, all or some parts of the tower structure could actually fall on neighboring homes [the closest home is 38 feet from the actual center of the proposed site] We believe that there are alternative sites in the area that would be safer and more appropriate for a proposed cell tower and therefore request that an alternative site analysis be done to ?nd the safest and most appropriate site for this tower. Name Address Phone Number (fill-FEM 01709 fl}: gig-arrmta (17? 930'Z33v0753 Signature