Page 0001 M342 use. 252mm Page 0602 U.S.C. 252mb} (blt3li42 use. 262atni (C From: (cosiocoomseei Sent: onay, anuary 05, 2009 3:50 PM To: Gangadharan. Denise (CDCICOTPERIDSAT) (CTR) Cc: Holmes, Harvey ?1191142 U-S-C- @252? Edwards, Jacquetine Subject: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab At 3:02 pm. today. I received an e-mail from PLI Ebif3i142U-S-C-?2523ihi Ireporting that someone had left the deionized water on over the hotida?w room. As a result. several inches of water were noted at approximately 2:44 pm. in the lab Suite. behind trim. Our office nor the Of?ce of Health and Safety has had any reports of water leakage into adjacent space to alert us to this occurrence before now. We are currently investigating the extent of any possible leakage of the water (if any}. A Form 3 report will be submitted in accordance with reporting requirements. Sincerely, U.S.C. 262ath} Customer Satisfaction Survey. Ibis document is intended for lhi: use ni'thc rcuipicntisi named above. [1 ma} contain sensitive: intiirmaliun that is protected privileged. or and it should not be disseminated. th?ilril?ltlt?tt, or copied tn not utittiurirxd tu such information. if 3.1m arr.- nm the intended um dissemination. distribution. or copying is ?iII'lL'llf. prohibited If jmu thinl. 5m: lint-i.- rcuciwd this document error. please unlit) Immediately. and destroy. the origins! U.S.C. 2623 From: Sent To: Cc: Subject: [Em mama icocrocoorosspi Friday, January 16, 2009 9:09 AM (blt?l CTR [b}tf3}:42 use, 2522mm (CDCIOCDOIOSEP) t-W: Report or Wate' Leak in Registered La Per betow, in case it is necessary for us have formally reoorted the incident on a Form 3. please ?nd the attached that was provided to me on DWUWZOUQ by the mm? I [b}t3}:42 ii 262301) (mayo use. 262arh} Respectfully submitted. u.s.c. 2522101) Customer gatisfaction Survey. his dncuutcnt is intended lor the cut-lusty..- us: of [he named ilhll?vl.? It may Contain information that in protected. privileged. or con?dential. and it should no: he digscminulcd. distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to such information. ll? you not the intended t. M) dihcntinalinn. distribution, n: cop} ing is strictly prultihilt?d Ifyou think you hurt reached this dncunwnt in error. please notify tht' immediately and destroy tht: original. From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Per below. and I apologize for not following up soonerl IFI all?!? Thursda Janua 15, 2009 3:46 PM (CDCICOWEWDSAT CTR FW: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab land still trying to catch was determined by entity facilities and maintenance personnel that there was no leakage of the water dissoyered on the ?oor outside of the registered laboratory. The water was cleaned up by laboratory personnel and the floor was decontaminated. Since this did not result in an actual release of agent outside of the registered laboratory, is submission of the Form 3 required? Many thanks for your assistance with this request for clari?cation. [b}(3}242 U.S.C. 252301} QSEP customer Satisfaction Survey. This document is intended for thi: C-?LCil?sl?nL' use of the named show. It may. contain information that is protected. privileged, or con?dential. and it should not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons not authorith to such information. if you are not the intended any dissemination. distribution. or copying is strictly priihihited. Ifyou think you how: received this document itt error. please notify the sander immediately and destroy the original. From: page? (cocrocoorosem Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 3:50 PM To: Ganadharan Denise Cc: (coqcaorncpocto); Holmes, Harvey T. ma El Weathers, Michael Edwards, Jacqueline Subject: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab At 3:02 pm. today. I received an e-mail from Pl. reporting that someone had left the deionized water on over the holida in the room. As a result. several inches of water were noted at approximately 2:44 pm. in the lab Suite. behind the Our of?ce nor the Of?ce of Health and Safety has had any reports of water leakage into adjacen space to alert us to this occurrence before now. We are currently investigating the extent of any possible leakage of the water (it any). A Form 3 report will be submitted in accordance with reporting requirements. Sincerely. U.S.C. 252ath} Customer Satisfaction Suwev. This. document is intended for the ChCiltSiU.? use nl'tlii: named above. It may contain sensitive in?mttutinn that is protected. privileged. or con?dential. and it should not he disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons not attihori?rctl to receive such information. If you are not the intended any dissemination. distribution. or Copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this document in error. please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. 2 Page 0006 use. 252mm Page 000? use. 252.331) From: mild Sent: Wednesday Janua 07 2009 10:23 AM TO: I not I liar? sane Subject: Re: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab Great--thank you. Sent using BIackBerry From: E2333 To: Em Sent: Wed Jan 07 09:44:19 2009 Subject: RE: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab Spoke with Steve. he reports no visible signs of a leak. I (NEE-12 From: 2 (CDCJOCODIDSEP) Sent: Tuesda Janus 06 2009 3:08 PM To: {coctcuo/ticeoao) Subject: RE: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab Him Has the maintenance group gotten back to you yet to indicate whether or not there was any water leakage from the laboratory. I know you mentioned that the floor is sealed. but we should probably add a statement that the verification was done and con?rmed that no leakage into adjoining space occurred due to the sealed ?oor if that is indeed the case. Please contact Steve Koob to verify and modify the Form 3 before I submit it. Many thanks in advance for your expeditious handling of this report. use. ?262a(h} OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. 1 tin. document is intended for the exclusive use of the named above It meg. oiintaim information is protected. privileged or con?dential. and it should not he diasmniitatcd. distributed, or to persons not In receive such information It'fu'iti are not the intended an) dissemination. distribution. or copying is prohibited Ifymi think you time receited this document in error, please notify Ihe sender intuit-dram!) and destroy. the original From: 3 Sent: Tuesda January 06, 2009 2:3? PM To: (cocrocooroSEP) Subject: RE: Report of water Leak in Registered Lab Revised Em (b}(3}242 U.S.C. 262801} From: I 2 I Sent: Mona Jana 05 2009 5:14 PM To: Subject: FW: Report of Water Lead: in Registered Lab Regarding my e?mail below-we actually were there on 1222/08. not the 19m as I stated below. (more use. 2522mm OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survev. This document is intended For the use old?: recipienttsi named above It may coolant infomlation that is protected, privileged. or con?dential, and it should not be disseminated. distributed, or copied to persons not outhorircd to such Information [I'yuu are not the intended on}- disscminalion. distribution. or copying Is prohibited. Ifyou think you have received this document in emit. please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. From: ?339;: W?rcmrocoorosm Sent: Mona Janua 05 mm 5:0? PM To: {cocrcmomceocroi Subject: RE: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 2E2a[h} access was deleted to the laboratory on December 19 right after I completed the select agent inventory reconciliation effort with him (around 4:00 At the time that we were in the room, there was no water running. I will be glad to request a print out of access records for the laboratory from the period December 19 through December 31 to better determine how long the water may have been left on. i am not sure that speci?cally naming on the Form 3 is appropriate without the access record veri?cation. Kindest regards, I [b}[3}242 U.S.C. ?262a[h} I Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 252301} OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. This document 15 for the use ul'the named above It may column SCH?Illir'r: interruption dial rs protected. privileged. or cun?durtlinl. and should not hr: disseminated distributed. or to persons not authorized to l'dL'L'lh.? such information "you am.- not lh: intended any tilS?cn?limltiim. distribution. or copying rs strictly. prohibited ll'jmu mu Itznc received 131 is document in error. please nollti.? the sender Immediately; and the original From: 3 ?ml (cocrcaomceoc: o) Sent: Monda Jan US, 2009419 PM To: comma/05E?) Subject: RE: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab Hi I got the form 3 started. please let me know what you think. eel (rotate use. 252mm From: mini . (mocoorosem Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 3:50 PM To: Ganadharan Denise coorcorpewosmnm) . Cc: omcriocm); Holmes, Harvey T. (coqccromceocro); {Encrocoo/OS 5233 (CDCIDCOOIUSEP): Edwards, Jacqueline Subject: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab rugray.=r a At 3:02 pm. today. I received an e?mail from Filmin?i??bmll reporting that someone had left the deionized water on over the holida in the laboratory room. As a result, several inches of water were noted at approximately 2:44 pm. in the lab mg Suite. behind the Our office nor the Of?ce of Health and Safety has had any reports of water leakage into adjacent space to alert us to this occurrence before now. We are currently investigating the extent of any possible leakage of the water (if any}. A Form 3 report will be submitted in accordance with reporting requirements. Sincerely. [b}{3}242 USE. 252301} [b}[3}242 U.S.C. OSEP Customer Survey. This documcnt is intended for the exclusive use ofthc rccipicntis] named above. It may contain sensitive information that is privileged. or con?dential. and it should not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons not nuthorizcd to receive Such infomtaiion. li?you arc not the intended recipientis). any diasomination. distribution. or copying is prohibited. [Fyou think you have received this document error. plcosc notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. 0 1 U.S.C. 262 . (3)34 From: (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Sent: Thursdagi Janus 22 2009 4:24 PM TO: ri? Her? son? Subject: RE: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab Thank you, I?ll let DSAT know. [b}[3}242 USE. ?262a[h} OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. this ductnnent iv. intended I'm the use nl'llre named above. It may cunttun sensitive ittl'ortuttlitm that is protected. prn'jlegcd, nr mnlidcntial, and it should not di55cminalcd, dislrihulud, ur L'upicd In pert;th nut tn receive s'tlch If you are not the intended recipiemtSL dissemination. tlistrihutmn? or copying is strictly. If you think haw meshed this document in error, please notify the sctulur immediate!)- and tie-tun}. the original From: 3 Sent: Thursda Jan qr 22, 2009 4:20 PM To: (coerocooxosem Subject: RE: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab No, not for that water leak. From: Im '{?ocmcoolosem Sent: Thursda Janna 22 2009 4:12 PM To: Subject: RE: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab Thank you. Was a call placed result of the water leak found? [b}[3}242 USE. 252aLh} (maxim u.s.c. 262a(h} OSEP Cuslgmer Satisfaction Survey. 'Htis document is intended for exclusive use ol'lhe named above It may contain sensitive information that is protected. privileged or con?dential. and it should not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons not ?ulhnrihtd to receive such in Eirntatidn. if you are not the intended any dissemination. distribution, or copying is stricllj. prohibited. if you think you hm received this document in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. From: 3 Sent: Thursda January 22, 2009 12:27 PM To: [53 (sociocooiosem Subject: Fw: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab Here's an email i sent to Steve koob From: 3 Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 3:20 PM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDQOCODIBFO) Subject: FW: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab Hi, A flood was discoverefd in room yesterday. I know an engineer came by and offered to look at the floor below to see if there was any leakage. I would like to include in my report that you all checked and no leakage was found if that is the case. Thanks u.s.c. 252arh} ?339:2 Sent: 06 2009 3:08 PM To: 2528 Subject: epo rater Leak in Registered Lab Hi Has the maintenance group gotten back to you yet to indicate whether or not there was any water leakage from the I know you mentioned that the ?oor is sealed, but we should probably add a statement that the verification was done and confirmed that no leakage into adjoining space occurred due to the sealed floor it that is indeed the case. Please contact Steve Koch to verify and modify the Form 3 before I submit it. Many thanks in advance for your expeditious handling of this report. [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 262a[h} (b}(3}242 USE. ZEEath} OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. Thisa is intended fur the exclusnc use of the rccipiuntis) named above. [i may cutitnin sentiitiire in tiirniritiun that in prulucteti privileged. 0r Clin?dcnti?i. and it sltiiultl not be disseminated. distributed. UT copied to persons not ttuthtirizcd to receive such If 3.1m an; not the Intended retipicnli eng- dissemination. distribuliun. ur cup}. ing is strictly prohibited If [mu think you have received this duetmtenl in error. please notify the kerittcr and destmy the original From: WW 252m Sent: Tuesda Janua GE, 2009 2:3? PM To: mane/?00mm Subject: RE: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab Revised form 3 use. 2522mm From: {339:2 Sent: Manda Janua 2009 5:14 PM To: Subject: Fw: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lat: [El Regarding my email below-we actually were there on 122308. not the 19th as I stated below. use. 252nm OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. Ius dticutitent is intended fur the exclusive use iiftiie rt?cipiL'ntts} named :IbCI?t'c. ll cunltliti sensitive int?nntiatinii that is. protected. privileged. nr con?dential. and it should nut hi: disseminated, distributed. or copied in persons ntit authurired it: receive such intiirinati'nn. tt'ji'ou are not the intended mi} dissemination. 01' Copying is ?ttirtig.? pmhihited. If you think 3.1m lime received this in strut, pic-11f: notify the sender immediately. and the tiriginnl. From: ?33952 Sent: MondayI January 05, 5:07 PM To: [bif3tc42 USE. 262afh} Subject: RE: Report of Water Leak in Registered Lab maccess was deteted to the laboratory on December 19 right after I completed the select agent inventory reconciliation effort with him {around 4:00 pm). At the time that we were in the [Egg room. there was no water running. I will be glad to request a print out of access records for the laboratory from the period December 19 through December 31 to better determine how long the water may have been left on. I am not sure that specifically naming on the Form 3 is appropriate without the access record veri?cation. Kindest regards. reinstate use. 2623fh} Customer Satisfaction Survey. 'I'hia document is intended for the exclusive use ofthe reeipienttsi minted ohm-e. It may. cunt-.un sensitive tnfurmatinn that is protected. privileged. or con?dential. and it should tlul be disseminated. distributed. or copied to per-anus not authorized to such Inturmation. If you are not the intended any dissemination, distribution. or cup). ing is Strictly prohibited, If you think you have received this document in error. please notify the sender immediately and destro} the original. From: ibit3t142 0.8.0. 262801} Sent: Honda January 05, 2009 4:29 PM To: (encrocoorosern Subject: RE: Report ater Leak in Registered Lab Hi mil I got the form 3 started. please let me know what you think. I rn}r3}:42 use. 252arh} From: [33:12 tcociocoorosem Sent: Honda Janua 05 2009 3:50 PM To: I I (CWCOTPEWDSAT) Cc: :tbtt3ii42 uses 262% cor: can Holmes, Harvey T. (coercuomcpocm); {sociocoorosepxl - (cociocooioser?); Edwards, Jacqueline (CDQOCODIOSEP) Subject: Report of Water Leak in RegistEred Lab Lunoye a ROII fh'l. I At 3:02 pm. today. i received an e-mail from Pl, Inns in reporting that someone had left the deionized water on over the holida in the room. As a result. several inches of water were noted at approximately 2:44 pm. in the lab Suite. behind the Our of?ce nor the Of?ce of Health and - 3. Safety has had any reports of water leakage into adjacent space to alert us to this occurrence before now. We are currently investigating the extent of any possible leakage of the water (if any). A Form 3 report will be submitted in accordance with reporting requirements. Sincerely, (5)9142 use. ?2623(h} OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. This document is intended for the exclusive use ofthi: named above. It mug: contain acnsitivc intonnatitm that is protected priviicgcd. or con?dential, and it should not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons nut to recent: such intimnation. if you on: not the intended mcipitnit?i. all? di?scminationt distribution. or copying is strictly prohibited. if you think you have received this document in error. please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. WrcocrossLsaswPO) From: BEE {coprocooivosspi Sent: Monday, Februa 02 2009 9:43 AM Tu: cc: more lbtl?i Subject: Form 3 Report (Water Leak] Good Morning just received an e-mail from DSAT indicating that they have closed out the Form 3 report we submitted for your lab on the deionized water leak you reported to me on January 5, 2009. Thank you for your immediate report to our office of this event and for your assistance with the follow-up. I appreciate your support with our entity compliance effort. When you return from your trip. l'd like to meet with you to go over a checklist that I review with new Pl?s on registrations for our entity. Kindest regards, U.S.C. 252301} OSEP Customer Satisfaction Surya. This document Is intended for the cyclusivc use ofthi: ntan Il may contain information llim is prii or wn?dcnliul. and it should not he disseminated. distributed. or copied to permit) :mlhorircd to town: such inlurmalion. If you :er not the intended any (insemination, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you thin}. you him: this document in error. please notify the and destroy tlii: original From: FEE (cocrocooroseet Sent: Thursdajvi Janua 22 2009 9:10 AM TO: r'ht Her" sass Cc: Holmes. Harveyr T. Subject: Form 3 Good Morning I?ve received additional correspondence today from DSAT regarding the Form 3 we submitted on the water leak. They have asked for additional information as follows: "On review of your Form 3, it appears there were no exposures and no work was being conducted at the time the ?ooding occurred. In order for us to move forward in the closure process, please provide DSAT with copies of all internal CDC Incident Reports relating to this event." Please provide me with OHS or other CDC internal reports related to this occurrence so that I may forward them on to DSAT within the required 10-day suspense. Many thanks in advance for your assistance with this request. [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 252301} OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. this document is intended for exclusive use ol'llic named show. It may contain sensitive infomintinn that is or L'mllidc'nti?l. and it shuutd not be masculinatcd. tile-trihuwd. or copied to nut atilhnrircd to rcucii'c 51lL?h Information If you am: not the rcciplunltb}. 110): distribution. Copying. is strictly pruhihilcd Ifhiu think _I,uu ham: this document in arm. Pl-L?Hjt? notify tin: sender Immediately and destroy. the urtginttl. tor. 2120M SELECT Ariel?s PROERW NGllE-t F. in an: 40" osrnemsm or HEALTH HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control anti Prevention May 26. 2009 loirEI HE F. :urr' APHISICDC Form 3. Report of Theft. Loss. or Release of Select Agents and Toxins LDiij'Ai-t" Thank you for your e-mail dated May 21. 2009 con?rming that the aboratory HVAG system has been tested. balanced, nd that new doors have been installed. i apprec ate the support that yo; and the laboratory staff provided during the walk-through inspection on the same date. Based upon the review of the information submitted. the Centers for Disease Control and Prev?ntion (CDC). Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT) has no further questions at this time regarding this matter. roir3}:42 an Should you have questions or comments related to APHISICDC Form 3. please contact swam. with the CDC Select Agent Program - .tlant' GA 30333 .l??tf may also be reached by telephone at m. at nio:r_3::42 I Ll 2EEaih' I. I I I This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipientts} named above. it may contain sensitiVo information that is Pmt?c?ed. privileged. or con?dential. and it should not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. it you are not the intended recipientts). any dissemination. distribution. orcopying is. strictly Pr?hibilEd- If YOU "link you have received this document in error. please notify the sender immediater and destroy the original. E3114F?l?l From: SHGEHT 9:955g (cocrocoorosepi (cocrocoorosem Thursda Ma 2009 2:2? PM man Stephen H. Massung. Robert (coerce new: . . clomczveo}; Howard,'William (Bill) {cocrocooronsi enovations (TLR: May 25. 200?) (C RIDSAT) Koob air?ow testing and balance for the HVAC modifications and door installation was completed on Thursday, May' 14. 2009, as per Steve Koob. Buildings and This is to confirm for you renovation project for the Facility Office. 262aih: Respectfully submitted. Habit-ii USE 52628411: OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. This document is intended for the exclusive use of the rccipicnt?s] named above. it may contain sensitive information that is protected, privileged, or con?dential. and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorised to recoit?e such information. if you are not the intended recipientts}, any dissemination. distribution. or copying. is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this document in errorI please notify the sender immediater and destroyI the original. From: Wrcocrocoorosem Sent: Wednesda Ma 13, 2009 4:42 PM To: mil (CDCiocoorOHs - Holmes, David icocrocoororrsi; BEE Cc: How '.liam (Bill) Koob. Stephen H. Subject: RE: USE-s renovation [b}(3}242 USE. - 2523 In reference to your e-mails below. DSAT did not make a limitation regarding work starting. They requested a we - throu to v. com :iletion of renovation items but did not stipulate that work could not begin. I sent an e-mail t: (?ital and. 3 :42 - on 5l7i'2009 and stated the following: "We are scheduled for the walk-through of thel on May 21, 2009, at 2:00 p.m.--meet in Lobby area, Please note that the laboratory may actually be "hot" prior to that date based on evaluation and approval by the entity Office of Health and Safety." i did not receive a respor, two could not begin work in the laboratory prior to the May 21. 2009. It should be noted that the registered and that our shut?down was a voluntary shut-down scheduled by our entity rather than ordered by DSAT. The reason for DSAT's Walk-through is to close out the Form 3 report that was generated from the air?ow incident report of May 25. 2007. As long has we have adequate documentation in place to ensure that the laboratory was properly tested upon completion of the project and from indicating the laboratory is once again commissioned for work, there should not be a problem with permitting work to begin again. Sincerely. (oiisiz42 use. 252arh} OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. this document is intended for the estimate us: ol'thc named chow li may contain thin lf- writ-acted. 1rltilligtd.{ll con?dential. and Il slwuld n01 ht: disseminated. distributed, or copied to person; not to recent: such It'ynii on: not the intend-:41 rvupiunitst. an) distribution or copying 1.x strictly. prohibited It'you thith you havi- I.th document in error. please until}. ilii: sender immediately and destroy, the original From: mg Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 3:22 PM To: Holmes, David micocicao/chvso) Cc: Howard, Bill] Koob, Stephen H. GEE (cociocoorossp) Subject: RE: 352% renovation it'll". a "b DEPARTMENT oF HEALTH ssavress Public Health Service i Centers for Disease Control I and Prevention I TO: Itl:[3H1? US 53. I mire-.42 CDC Atlanta Campus USE ?2528[h!- RE: 42 C.F.R. 73.? (Registration and related security risk assessments) DATE: April 23, 2009 In response to your e?mail to me dated, Monday, April 20, 2009, 8:37 AM, requesting an update on the It's; ""552 construction project, the following is provided: 1. The doors have been installed. 2. The fans have been installed. 3. Air flow test and balance is in progress. It is anticipatedthat this effort will be completed next week. Feel free to Contact me if you have any additional questions regarding this matter. I'b'IE?ritlE Ll SC. 262mb: L: \E?ORMSHAdminNmemoJ?mdoe Rev. sisuol - (cocrocomosee) - From: jj-E??f?l (CTR) Sent: 'v'icndsi A ril 2009 8:37 AM To: lite-*5. a (cocrocoomsem Cc: me: me;- CDCICOTPERIDSAT) Subject: Update on the Construction Good Morning At your convenience. please provide us an update on the Moonstruction. Our last update on the construction-was August 5. 2008. This request relates to the Form 3 incident that occurred on May 25. 2007. Thanks. Ii]'rt'3' 4? US 5. 2523i? be Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipientts) named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protested privileged. oroon?dential. and it should not be disseminated, distributed. or copied to parse no not authorized to receive such information. It you are not the intended recipien its]. any dissemination. distribution. or copying is stric?y prohibited. ityou think you have reoeived this document in error. pleaso notify the sender immediately and riestnzuir the original. Thank you. . From: Black. Carolyn (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Thursda A ri 2012 10:25 PM To: Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Subject: RE: Question 1D--Please Assist I'm sorry I didn?t respond earlier. We agree with your suggested response below and as it appears in the report you sent later this evening. lfthere is anything else that needs clarifiCation, please contact me. I will be available tomorrow after approximately 11 am. Thanks, Carolyn From: Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:36 PM To: Black, Carolyn Powell, Nathaniel Subject: Question 10~5P ease Assist Dr. Black/Dr. Powell, [b}[3}242 U.S.C. Lb}[3}142 U.S.C. 262afh} From: Black. Carolyn (CDCJOIDINCEZJD) Sent: Thursda r' .2012 3:42 PM To: ??cocmsamsappol Subject: RE: Vivarium in 0 0k, will send revised response document shortly. Thanks. From: Sent: Thursda A ril 19, 2012 3:37 PM To: Black, Carolyn Subject: RE: Vivarium info Dr. Black, has confirmed that both roomandere unoccupied on February 14 and 16 and further that was unassigned on February 14 and 15. Hope that helps. [b}[3}242 U.S.C. From: $3 Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:35 PM To: Black, Carolyn (cocrommcezm); Subject: Fw: Vivarium info b} See avout From: $3 Sent: Tuesday, April 2012 10:10 AM To: Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: Vivarium info Lo Nate an ?33.42 1i- For you records, attached are PDF's of the sign in log sheets for the Bldivarium (from just prior to the December 2011 shutdown to the end of last month) and an image of the layout and usage of the Vivarium at the time of the DSAT visitltraining. I [Sit-4 USE. 252a[h} - Ewe}? 42323 From: Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 2:0? PM To: Zambuto, Laura R. . cc: Lit-~- ll?PJ- 9 I Subject: FW: Closing Letter: APHISICDC Report of Theft, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxins For your records please see e-mail below and attached as close-out to the report of loss of water pressurein the HCL shower on May 12, 2011. Thank you, again, for 1your report to our office of this occurrence. Regards, Ll SC. ?2625ll 1t From: D'Avilar, Torrie B. (CTR) Sent: Frida Jun 2011204 PM Tu: I Cc: lam (cocxopnperosn'r), [all Subject: Closing Lett?r: Report of Theft, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxins are: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (C DC), Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT) appreciates your prom pt response. Please see the attached correspondence regarding a potential exposure occurring at yourfacility on May 12, 2011. Should you have questions or comments related to the attached correspondence, please contact or with the ram at 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop lit?46, Atlanta, GA 30333. can be reached by Imeaz SE. szazamt saszaim i .-I ?52atnf In?sc alcan be reached WI but? 1 CDC Atlanta 542-2011? Thank you, Mr; Terrie SEA lntemational Inc. Executive Assistant lo nos; a Dr. Denise Gang adharan. Acting Associate Director for Science Division of Select Agents Toxins Of?ce of Public Health Preparedness and Response Contractor for Centers for Disease Control a Prevention Mainline: 404-718-2000 Phone: 404-713-2086 Fax: 404-718-2096 Email: Cell: DSAT Vision: To be the preeminent resource for the safety and se curitv of biological agents and toxins. This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protected, privileged, or con?dential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. It you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this document in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. Thankyou. '1 - From: D'Avilar, Torrie a. (CTR) Sent: Friday. June 1" D11 2:04 PM To: long-"Er [at a Cc: [33:5 I Subject: Closing Letter: APHISICDC Report of Theft, Loss. or Release of Select Agents and Toxins that The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT) appreciates your prompt response. Please see the attached correspondence regarding a potential exposure occurring at your facility on May 12, 2011. Should you have questions or comments related to the attached correspondence, pleas contactld'l?d Laid? CDC Select Agent Program at 16il0 Clifton Road, Mailstop illached I ?2E2aih_: can be reached t. ?19143 5-C-e2'32mi11 CDC Atlanta 5-12-2011_ Thank you, Mrs. Torrie D'Avilar, SPA International Inc. Executive Assistant l1 lone. 8v Dr. Denise Gangad aran, 0 mg I ance Division of Select Agents 8: Toxins Of?ce of Public Health Preparedness and Response Contractor for Centers for Disease Control 3: Prevention Mainline: 404-718-2000 Phone: 404-718-2085 Fax: Email: Cell: DSAT Vision: To be the preeminent resource for the safety and security of biological agents and toxins. This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protected, privileged, or con?dential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. if you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this document in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. Thank you. I i DEPARTMENT OF HEHLTH 3: HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention June 2011 RE: APHISICDC Form 3, Report of Theft, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxins Thank you for your June 9, 2011 response to questions posed by the Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT) relating to a relating to a loss of water to the showers inI on May 12, 2011. Based upon the review of the information submitted, DSAT has no further questions at this time regarding this matter. Should you have questions or comments related to APHISICDC Form 3, please contact or with the CDC Select Agen' Prooram at 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop Atan' GA 30333. can be reached by I I can be reached by I or both. This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipie nt(st named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protected. privileged, or con?dential. and it should not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. If you are not the intended recipientts). any dissemination. distribution. or copying is strictly prohibited. If yciu think you have received this document in error. please notify the sender immediater and destroy the original. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH It HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention June 17, 2011 [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 262301} RE: APHISICDC Form 3, Report of Theft, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxins Thank you for your June 9, 2011 response to questions posed by the Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT) relating to a relating to a loss of water to the showers inI i on May 12. 2011. Based upon the review of the information submitted, DSAT has no further questions at this time regarding this matter. Should you have questions or comments related to Form 3, please contact or la?iu] with the CDC Select Agent Program at 1600 Clifton Road. Mailstop A-46. (mists? use. 252m}. I333. can be reached by can be reached U.S.C. 262aih} for both. [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 2523ih} runs} This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipientts} named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protected, privileged, or confidential. and it should not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. if you are not the intended recipientis}. any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this document in error. please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. I Limiteg??li Eye-332m From: Sent: Thursda June 09, 2011 3:04 PM To: $0923 we I CCIOPHPRIDSATSubject: RE: Report of Theft. Loss. or Release of Select Agents and Toxins Good Afternoon Please find attached our response to the DSAT request for additional information regarding our report of loss of water pressure in the 8 ng on May 12, 2011. or Division-May 12 Report-CDC. .. Respectfully submitted, U.S.C. 2525011} From: legato Sent: Thursday, Ma 26, 2011 12:26 PM To: - Cc:j Egg-52;? Subject: RE: Report of Theft, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxins Him I apologize for the delay regarding your request. Your deadline has been extended to June 13, 2011. Please let me know if this date will work for you. Best regards, [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 252301} Sincerel . mama so DSAT Vision: To be the preeminent resource for the safety and security of biological agents and toxins. This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protected, privileged, or confidential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. lfyou think you have received this document in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. Thank you. From: [53% BEES Se 26 2011 11 32 AM To: . mil Cc: Subject: Report of Theft, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxins [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 262801) I still have not heard back as to whether or not we may have an extension on the time-frame in which to submit our additional information to DSAT as requested in the e-mail below. Please see e-mail chain below and advise so we can pass the message along to our Buildings and Facilities Of?ce team Many thanks in advance for your attention to this request. (b}[3}242 USE. 252301} From: Wcocxosasnseppm Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 10:55 AM To: D'Avilar, Torrie B. (CTR Cc: will @3223 E33 Subject: RE: CDC Report of Theft, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxins Good Afternoon Mrs. D'Ayilar. Our Buildings and Facility Of?ce (BFO) has requested that I inquire about obtaining an extension on the required response to the DSAT request for additional information provided in your e-mail below. An individual that needs to address several of the facility-related items is on leave through June 2011. Would an extension be possible? If so, what would the new required submission date be? Thank you in advance for your consideration of this request. Reapectfully, rename use. 262aih} From: D'Avilar, Torrie B. (CDCIOPHPRIDSAU (CTR) Sent: Friday, May 0, 2011 9:1? AM To; - Cc: - IEE Subject: CDC Report of Theft, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxins I The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT) has received a Form 3 report from your facility regarding an incident that occurred on May 12, 2011. Please respond to the attached questions within 10 days of receipt. E-mail is the prefened method of response. Should you have questions or comments related to the attached correspondence, please contact or with the CDC 8 lectA en Pr 1 Clifton Road, Mailstop A-4E rp}r3}:42 use. esaarh} mcan be reached by Lb}t3}:42 use. 262a for both. I uses esearh} File: First Letter CDC _5-l2-2011_ 5-20-20] Thanks, Mrs. Torrie D'Avilar. set-mama Inc Executive Assistant to 8. Dr. Denise Gangadharan, Acting Associate Director for Science Division of Select Agents 8: Toxins Of?ce of Public Health Preparedness and Response Contractor for Centers for Disease Control 8; Prevention Mainline: 404-718-2000 Phone: 404-?18-2086 Fax: 404318-2096 Email: iq58@cdc.gov {mfg} 05.4 Vision: To be the preeminent resource for the safety and security of biological agents and toxins. This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient named above. it may contain sensitive information that is protected, privileged, or confidential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. if you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this document in error, please notify the sender immediater and destroy' the original. I he 5:1 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 8: HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service We.? Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (C DC) TO: Division of Select Agents and Toxins Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mail Stop A46 Atlanta, GA 30333 . [mom use. a 252mm. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention?Entity units: 42 U5 DATE: June 9, 2011 SUBJECT: APHISICDC Form 3, Report of Theft, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxins The purpose of this correspondence is to provide a written response to your req1 est for additi al ation regarding our report of loss of water pressure to the showers in the 9523'? Lm'gm'idc Rm i on May 12, 2011. Provided with this submission are the following. .1. 2.5%th l. A copy of your request for additional information, dated May 20, 201 1. 2. A copy of responses generated by our entity Buildings and Facilities Of?ce for the DSAT requests for additional information. I 3. A copy of the laooratorv e'meroencv exit procedures from the laboratory safety manual as ?lrnished by the tears: 42 uses 252nm Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this submission. submitted C. Attaclunents 'w gun. lg~u 3" r? DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 3 HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention May 20. 2011 use. 252mm I [migrate use. 252aih} RE: APHISICDC Form 3. Report of Theft, Loss. or Release of Select Agents and Toxins The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT) thanks on for rovidin a inopsis cf the incident that occurred relating to a toes of water to the showers in I [science-seem: on May 12. 2011. in relation to this incident, DSAT requests that the following questions be addressed: [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 252ai?h} 1. What was the root cause for the temporary water loss in the 2. What have you done to prevent this type of incident from occurring again? 3. Please send a copy of the section or sections in your incident response plan that addresses this type of situation. 4. From a facility point of view. was there anything that you could have doneibeen done to prevent this shua?cn? 5. Please describe your after event action plan to deal with future occurrence should this happen again. Please respond to the above-listed questions within ten (10) business days of receipt of this letter. E-maii responses are acceptable. Please direct all correspondence and questions related to this incident to E3 or with the CDC Select Agent Program at 1500 Clifton Road. Mailstoo A46. Atlanta. GA 30333. can be reached by! ?Jim? lilac-ml can be readily or both. [bii?i This document is intended to: the exclusive use oi the racipientts) named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protected. privileged. or confdentiel. and it shouid not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. It you are not the Intended recipien?s). any dissemination. distribution. or copying Is strictly prohioitod. it you think you have Ieoelimd this document in enor. piease notify the sender immediateiy and destroy the original. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-I [moreseasons. US May 12, 2011 th:r3_::42 DSAT uestibn What was the root cause for the temporary water loss in the 35;; CDC BFO Response: Closure of the incorrect water valve in the service tunnel by the Turner Construction contractor. The Roybal Campus requires at least two main supplies to maintain preper laboratory water pressure. .One supply is closed for repairs. When the service turmel valve was closed, the water pressure dropped below acceptable levels. - DSAT Question 2: What have you done to prevent this type of incident from occurring - again? CDC BFO Response: Water valves in the service tunnel will have signage attached to alert all pertinent maintenance personnel prior to operating valves. Also, valves should not'be operated by commotion contractOrs. BSAT Question it 3: Please send a copy of the section or sections in your incident response plan that addressladdresses this type of situation. CDC Response: Please see attached copy of Emergency Exit Procedures from the '?t'ig?igj? i Safety Plan,_ pages 33?84.? DSATiQuestion 4: From a facility point of view, was there anything that youcould have donefbeen done to prevent this situation? CDC BFO Response: All water outages requiring less than 2 supply valves being fully open will be required to be performed during off-duty hours or on weekends. I DSAT Question 5: Please describe your after event action plan to deal with future occurrence should this happen again. CDC BFO Respense: All water outages requiring less than 2 supply valves being 1311]}; open will be required to be performed during eff-duty hours or on weekends. Exnmo' suiteIm?WL?ri'C'WII rhesus-seem iN THE EVENT oF AN EMERGENCY (Non?life threatening emergency) 1. Stop all work immediately. 1 2. Call your supervisor or the division safety representative and report observations. 3. Secure all potentially biohazardous material prior to exiting the containment suite, if possible. (oniy ifsefe, quick egress is NOT compromised) - a. Ensure lids a - all biohazardous waste. if possible, place in autoclave, secure inside or incubator?. b. Close sash on rosafety cabinet c- Spray disinfectant on work surfaces . d. Secure all specimens in freezers - Unless otherwise directed, exit the laboratory. Proceed quickly and calmly. Spray your head, face shield, chest, and PAPR with 70% ethanol. Remove your outer slaves andrmeeibsmuemamdamtias. Proceed into the [biei?u-S-C-?Wami and remove your remaining PPE. Ifthere is time. shower out as usual. If there is not time for a shower, put on a new tyvek suit in the inner change room and proceed through the shower. outer change room, and into the corridor 8- Proceed to'designated gathering area away from other evacuating personnel. 4?49" Evacuation procedure if regular exit is blocked, or there is a life threatening emergency (crash exit) 1. Secure all potentially biohezardous material prior to exiting the containment suite, if possible. ?(oniy if safe, quick egress is NOT compromised) e. Ensure lids on alt biohazardous waste and place in autoclave if possible I (or incubator) f. Close sash on bidsafety cabinet . 9. Spray disinfectant on work surfaces h. Secure U.S.C. 252301} Deflate the door using the entergency' override button, step outside of the lab. and close the door behind you. re 4. Grab a Tyvek suit from the ?Emergency em" in the corridor. . 5. Once you are out of immediate danger, remove PAPR, tyvek suit. hair cover, and gloves and put on the new Tyvelr su Ll?lyou must exit the building with your PPE on. then proceed immediately to the ME assembly area for decontamination. 6. Proceed to designated gathering area away fromother evacuating personnel. sire From: Wailmocrosasnseppm Se .. . rm. . -v (coorOPHPwosm; Cc:. mam Subject: APHISICDC Report of Theft, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxins [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 262alh} I still have not heard back as to whether or not we may have an extension on the time-frame in which to submit our additional information to DSAT as requested in the e-mail below. Please see e-mail chain below and advise so we can pass the message along to our Buildings and Facilities Of?ce team. Many thanks in advance for your attention to this request. Sincerel Lb}{3}142 U.S.C. 2E2aLh} From: Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 10:56 AM To: D?Avilar, Torrie e. (CTR) . E33 some it] Subject: RE: APHISICDC Report of Theft, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxins Good Afternoon Mrs. D'Avilar. Our Buildings and Facility Of?ce (BFO) has requested that inquire about obtaining an extension on the required response to the DSAT request for additional information provided in your e-maii below. An individual that needs to address several of the facility-related items is on leave through June 2011. Would an extension be possible? If so, what would the new required submission date be? Thank you in advance for your consideration of this request. Respectfully, ?CPI-sol? I {11- [mr3r42 use. 262arh} From: D'Avilar, Torrie B. (CTR) Sent: Friday, May 2011 9:1? AM To; - Cc: Subject: APHISICDC Repert of Thett, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxins 1 .I I The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT) has received a Form 3 report from yourfacility regarding an incident that occurred on May 12, 2011. Please respond to the attached questions within 10 days of receipt. E-mail is the preferred method of response. 1I "(should you have questions or commentsrelated to the attached correspondence, please contactle?i-U .12 lot CDC Select Agent Program at 1300 Clifton Road, Mailstop Atlanta GA 30333. can be reached I C: szoaarn Ican be reached by malt-42 so. 2s2arm for hon-L Int-[3 :12 USE. 2E23il?l; sis: File: First Letter CDC _5-1 2-201 1_ Thanks. Mrs. Torrie D'Ayiiar, SRA international inc. Executive Assistant tol one: II we II was mite- Dr. Denise Gangadharan, Acting Associate Director for Science Division of Select Agents Toxins Ot?ce of Public Health Preparedness and Response Contractorfor Centers for Disease Control a Prevention Mainline: 404-718-2000 Phone: 404-718-2086 Fax: 404-718-2096 Email: Cell: DSAT Vision: To be the preeminent resource for the safety and security of biological agents and forms. This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protected, privileged, or con?dential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receiye such information. If you are not the intended recipient] any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. if you think you have received this document in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. D?Avilar, Torrie s. (CTR) Friday Ma 20, 2011 siege Co: 54? Subject: Report of Theft, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxins The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT) has received a Form 3 report from your facility regarding an incident that occurred on May 12, 2011. Please respond to the attached questions within 10 days of receipt. E-mail is the preferred method of response. Should you have questions or comments related to the attached correspondence, please contact or mwith the r?m?elenLAoem?memau?u?mi?on Road, Matistop A46 Atlanta GA 30333. can be reached I (mete use. 252aih} mm? be reached [mete use. 252mm use. 262aih) for both First Letter CDC 5-12-2011? Thanks. Torrie D'Aviiar. SRA International Inc. Executive Assistant to this} a Dr. Denise ence Division of Select Agents Toxins Of?ce of Public Health Preparedness and Response Contractor for Centers for Disease Control it Prevention Mainline: 404-713?2000 Phone: 404-?18?2086 Fax: 404-713-2096 Email: igsa@cdc.gov Cell: DSAT Vision: To be the preeminent resource for the safety and security of biological agents and toxins. This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protected, privileged, or con?dential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. If you are not the intended recipient, am,r dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictlv prohibited. if vou think you have received this document in error, please notify the sender immediately and destrov the original. nu. Public Health Service DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention May 20. 2011 [b}[3}242 USE. 252301} Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road I use. 2623(h} RE: APHISICDC Form 3. Report of Theft. Loss. or Release of Select Agents and Toxins The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT) thanks no for rovidin a nopsis of the incident that occurred relating to a loss of water to the showers in I thitSiziEU-S-C-??afhi on May 12. 2011. in relation to this incident. DSAT requests that the following questions be addressed: 1. What was the root cause for the temporary water loss in the ibit3ir42U-S-C- ?2B2aihi 2. What have you done to prevent this type of incident from occurring again? 3. Please send a copy of the section or sections in your incident response plan that addresses this type of situation. 4. From a facility point of view. was there anything that you could have donei'been done to prevent this situation? 5. Please describe your after event action plan to deal with future occurrence should this happen again. Please respond to the abovelisted questions within ten (10) business days of receipt of this letter. E-mail responses are acceptable. Please direct all correspondence and questions related to this incident to IE or EB with th coo Select Agent Program at 1500 Clifton Road. 545' Atlanta. on 30333. mystic? Iiieh'eal can be reagheipy [h}lf3}:42 use. a 252arn} both. U.S.C. 2?2ath} This document is intended for the exclusive use or the recipientts) named above. it may contain sensitive information that is protected. privileged. or con?dential. and it should not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons not aulhorized to receive such information. It you are not the intended recipienttsi, any dissemination. distribution. or copying is strictly prohibited it you think you have received this document in error. please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original From: D'Avilar, Torrie B. (CTR) Sent: Friday June 17. 2011 2:04 PM TO: ?3 Co: BREE Subject: Closing Letter: APHISICDC Report of Theft, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxins 3(42 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT) appreciates your prompt response. Please see the attached correspondence regarding a potential exposure occurring at your facility on May 12. 2011. Should you have questions or comments related to the attached correspondence, please contact Edger mmwith the Clifton Road, Meilstop A46. Atlanta. GA 30333. mean he reached was 2523a, (b}l3}:42 use. 252arn} can be reached by [b)f3}242 U.S.C. 2E2a[h) fb}L3}:42 use. 5 252mm both. HIE CDC Atlanta _5-12-2011_ Thank you, Mrs. Tonia D'Avilar, SPA l?lnmalinnal rm. Executive Assistant to thit?i I it Dr. Denise Gangadharan. Acting Associate Directorfor Science Division of Select Agents it Toxins Of?ce of Public Health Preparedness and Response Contractor for Centers for Disease Control it Prevention Mainline: 404-?18?2000 Phone: 404-?13?2086 Fax: 404-718-2096 Email: inmR?r-rlr' nnu Cell: fbit?l DSAT Vision: To be the preeminent resource for the safety and security of biological agents and toxins. This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient named above. it may contain sensitive information that is protected, privileged, or confidential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. lfyou are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this document in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. Thank you. . Hyatt, Ted 0. (coprocooraroi Manda June 06 2011 Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Bowen, Jeff Subject: FW: Report of Theft, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxms Importance: High I: a - See my answers to items 2, 4, 8: 5 from your letter: 1. What was the root cause for the temporary water loss in thei ?5-9 imam Closure of Incorrect water valve in tunnel was by Turner Construction. Roybal campus requires at least two main supplies to maintain proper lab water pressure. One supval is closed for repairs. When the tunnel valve was closed, water pressure dropped below acceptable levels. 2. What have you done to prevent this type of incident from occurring again? I Water valves in tunnel will have signage attached to alert all pertinent maintenance personnel prior to operating valve. Also, valves should not be operated by construction contractors. 4. From a facility point of view, was there anything that you could have doneibeen done to prevent this s?ua?on? - All water outages requiring less than 2 valves being fully open will be required to be . performed during off-hours:r weekends. 5. Please describe your after event action plan to deal with future occurrence should this happen again. All water outages requiring less than 2 suppiv valves being fully open will be required to be performed during off-hoursi weekends. rn'r?' From: rites? Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 12:44 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. (cocrocoorsrm; Howard, William (Bill) (CDC/ocoorosnii); Probst, Paul E. (coprocoorsro); Walpole Kenneth K. cocrocooreFO); Hyatt, Ted 0. coprocooraFO) Cc: .. a . . Zambuto Laura R. Frazier, Rodrick (CDC/ocooiosnE) Subject: FW: Report of Theft, Loss, or Release of Select Agents and Toxins Per below e-mail from at DSAT, we have been given an extension on the date by which we must submit additional information to DSAT on the report of water less pressure {report made due to individual exiting the shower without taking a shower}. My understanding is that'we are waiting for Ted Hyatt to return from leave to provide the additional information needed Our new deadline for submission to DSAT is June 13., Please ensure that I receive responses to items 2. it 4, and 5 by June 10. i a: File: Water Pressure Loss-First Letter CDC _5-12-2011_ 5-20-2011.pdf he #Lh DEPARTMENT or HEALTH a HUMAN ssnvicas Public ?saith Service '5 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention May 20. 2011 lib Ill-'42 Ll SC. EEZalh. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1600 Clifton Road Atlanta. GA 30333 I I RE: Form 3. Report of Theft. Loss. or Release of Select Agents and Toxins The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT) thanks "ml for nmvidinn a nopsisof the incident that occurred relating to a loss of water to the showers in [his on May 12. 2011. In relation to this incident. DSAT reddests that the following questions be addressed: i. What was the root cause for the temporary water loss in the 2. What have you done to prevent this type of incident from occurring again? 3. Please send a copy of the section or sections in your incident response plan?that addresses this type of situation. 4. From a facility point of view. was there anything that you could have donelbeen done to prevent this situation? 5. Please describe your after event action plan to deal with future occurrence should this happen again. Please respond to the above?listed questions within ten (10) business days of receipt of this letter. E-mail responses are acceptable. Please direct all correspondence and questions related to this incident to Eider with the it to rot?46 Atlanta. GA 30333. can mile-49USE-5252M?. can be reached by telj tone-.42 us ?262auhz IfUr bom- ruzra u: use 5 ocean- rbiidi This document is intended for the exclusive use or the recipient{s} named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protected. privileged. or con?dential. and it should not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. If you are not the intended recipienttsi. anv dissemination. distribution. or copying is strictly prohibited. ll vou think you have received this document in error. please "our? the sewer irnt'nediaieltif and the original. USE. 25am} From: Sent: Frida Ma 13 011 2:06 PM To: I Intro: no Co: I l" Zambuto. Laura R. Subject: FW: Loss of water in th 5112 Please see below from the Let us know if you need anything additional. a? I I From: Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDINCIRD) I 2011 1:5? PM . .l - . (cot; I. snarleeoi Subject: Loss of water in th [5354 a 5(12 "?ll .. It}; Yeaterda morning around 10am there was a loss of waterto the showers in the [355 One ARE technician was inside the lab at the time. and since we did not know when the water would be back on. we moved her to a functioning shower. The technician removed her PPE per SOP, then donned a twek suit and exited the tory without taking a shower. I escorted herthrough the service tunnel to buildingl?here she signed into ourl' 3 select agent laboratory. She disposed of the tyvek suit in a biohazard bag, placed her scrubs in the laundry bin, and took- a personal shower. Please let me know if you need any additional information. Thanks, La ura The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT) has received a Form 3 report from your facility regarding an incident that occurred on May 12, 2011. Please respond to the attached questions within 10 days of receipt. E-mail is the preferred method of response. Should you have questions or comments related to the attached correspondence. please contact IE3 Eur mm with the Clifton Road, Mailstop A46, AW ibii3ii42 U30. ?2623ihi can he reached by tel use. 252m} a1 [merges-,5,? for both. File: First Letter CDC _5-12?201 1_ 15-2040] Thanks. Mrs. Torrie D'?wilarI A Executive Assistant to Wt Dr. Denise Gangadharan, Acting Associate Director for Science Division of Select Agents is Toxins Of?ce of Public Health Preparedness and Response Contractor for Centers for Disease Control Prevention Mainline: 404-?18?2000 Phone: 404-718~2086 Fax: 404-715-2096 Email: Ce": DSAT Vision: To be the preeminent resource for the safety and security of biological agents and toxins. This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient named above. it may contain sensitive information that is protected, privileged, or con?dential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this document in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. From: mtcocrmomoezm) Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 2:18 PM To: Barrett, Timothy J. Collier.Vinoe (cocrocooroseei; Kuwaiti-hint (coerciomcezro); Gumbis -- (oocrooronosx How rd Will (misieti-h?c-wea Killmaster. Lindsay Leslie, Rita L. Pedone James Powe a ante [bil3ii42U-S-C-?262aih} CDCJOIDINCEZID Prohat. Paul E. [maths-0% I Q: [We . Singletary Meadows, Kristi (CDCIOIDINCEZID Walpole, Kenneth K. Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. Subject: November HOG meeting minutes HOG members, Attached are the minutes from the last meeting. Hopefully you will have enough time tomorrow to review. Remember we have to approve the previous two meeting minutes as well. Enjoy. Operations Group Meeting N. .. use. 262ath} USE. ?252alh; Operatigns Group Meeting . 11/03/2011 9:00-10:00 19.11001]. 116 'Mcetingl called by: ?$33,934 mild-'35? - Type of meeting: Regular HOG Meeting Recorded: Attendees: Paul Probst, Bill Howard Laura Zambut?od ?52; 9 Timothy Barrett, Vince Collier, Stephanie Gumbis; 2 even owell, Paul Probst, lu'ailr'i?iire i IAllison Williams, Lindsa},r ?Killmaster, Paul Spurlock - MINUTES 'Uj'51-4 .1-. Agenda item: Minutes approval PresenterDiscussion: None Conclusions: Tableduntil next scheduled meeting Agenda item: ivarium Autoclaves ?Presenter: Discussion: Continued operational issues with the autoclave. In a recent meeting, the outcome included improved communications and dedicated FSE personnel. The following problems were identi?ed: Door sagging due to inadequate seal; Clogging drains secondary to ruptured bags; lack of air compressor redundancy; problems with the doors because of loose indicator strips; Conclusion: Moving forward only'dcsignated autoclave carts with gate will be?used to run loads, location of indicators will be reviewed; and signage developed indicating what to do! or who to call during various problems. and incident Presenter: more as. a 262mm Agenda item: Discussion: An unvaccinated person was taken into the grey area. In seeking additional guidance from about if a Form 33 was required, DSAT indicated that they need to be noti?ed of all incidents and they will make the determination if a Form 3B needs to be completed or not. A representative from DSAT explained that in reporting ALL incidents involving select agents we are providing protection for the agency. Conclusions: Clari?cation is needed from DSAT regarding CDC policy vs. DSAT policy. CDC DSAT wants't'o make the determination of what type of incidents must he reported on the Form 3B. Clari?cation is needed regarding ?lower level? incidents. Our labs are scheduled for inspection December 12-16. The has requested a time be set aside during this time fer HOG members to speak with a representative from DSAT. encourages HOG members to put forth various examplesr?scenarios to discuss. Currently, it seems the wants to make the determination of what incidents rise to the level of formal reporting. Agenda item: Bat colony move Presenter: Discussion: The bats are moving to I USO-s Irequested that OSHE USO-aria! change the bat level designation from [at3tr42U-S-C-5262atm lenhanced (or with ll] practices) developed a risk assessment and provided it to OSHE for evaluation by a review Conclusion: The review team recommended approval 0 [bl-t3'r42 U30. 252301} U.S.C. downgrade the facility housing requirements of the bats from - - oved the down grade in than level from uses practices to with El ractices) and movement to I - An of?cial approval letter from OSHE to mail] be provided in the coming week. The target move date is December Agenda item: MicroChem usage and preparation Presenter: I threw Discussion: MicroChcm shower tanks are supposed to be maintained by OSHE. However, recently Andy has had to ?ll because of low level alarms. Programs question if this responsibility has transitioned to the program personnel. OSHE maintains that the issue has been resolved and for now. will mintain the tanks. Discussion for the down the road will be who will ?ll the microchem ends November OSHE to ?ll the tanks in the am and pm. Further discussion took place regarding the 5% concentration. Is this overkill? There is currently no kill data info. Suggestion was made to discontinue use of MieroChem and use peracetic acid or other suitable replacement instead. Conclusion: Follow-up needed on who will provide ftmding for the purchase of MicroChem and when was the last time the water in the showers was calibrated. Agenda item: Preparation for Vivarium Shut down Presenter: Discussion: The target date remains of December 511'. All out and cleaned. All electrical items should be placed in the hood. Uncertain as to when the facility will be released for operation. The target date for start up is the week in January. Conclusion: Shut down- December Start up: (tentative) week in January. - - - - - 111 Agenda item medical emergency excretsc (Nov. 5 Presenter: Discussion: Still in need of 2 volunteers that are suit trained Parr-raise will take place legit-12 rnam lab 0f 5?}?ng start time 13 9 am tn the lecture room on Us: ems-2523 252ml]: Agenda item: Program Updates - Presenter: All Introductions. . 2 'is the current representative. Currently there are no agents in'thelab. Questions regarding the submission of a guinea pig protocol. Once approved, they will begin vector competency testing. 3:523 No cold water. All else ok. autoclave room remains clean for animal transfer scheduled for either Friday or Tuesday. Currently ntoving equipment. Main lab is schedule to go hot. Decon is almost complete. wants to make it clear that for the portable BSCs and bio clean units, the HEPA housings ARE NOT deconned at the time of VHP decon of the room. If those items need to be moved, program must notify OHSE so a decon of the HEPA housings is done. still needs to conduct testing for permanent monitoring. Newly installed unit has the potential to shut off which would lead to death of the animals - housed within if no alarm notifications are made. hot as of yesterday slit: to come down earl? naxt Weak (TueSday) LJCIC @252? study to end November 14th. 55m?. tables are an issue. The-down dra? table is leaking somewhere and needs to be addressed in March during the take down. to work wit 55'.st 2 the decon of the equipment. There are 2 new short bioclea punts-n would like at least 1934? aking ownership will depend on when bats are out of May be able to take them both. ?55-5 is scheduled to come in March (will be good because lab is down). 2523I'h' DSAT is schedulec for December. RABIES: All is ok. I'hjn'j'F-LZ USE: ARB: There is equipment in 23 leftover from man- 6? biosafety cabinet for the redline caging 2 smaller VHP'units (covers 70cubie feet) 1 larger VHP units (covers 10000 cubic feet) May give units to Cradacks group for use with emergency response team. IACUC: semiannual ?ndings are pending. Consent expressed by IACUC about the use of [Elli-.42 breathing air versus medical grade 02 in the OSEP: Preparation for exercise. Will alert Walden security to the exercise. SA: Holmes is setting up a meeting to allow comment on the proposed SA changes to regulations. BF 0: Beginning preparation for visit. From: (cosiosasrtseppoi Sent: 7:49 PM To: mitt} DCIOPHPRIDSAT) Subject: Re: mvivarium Essa Yes, and we have reoccupied the Programs are actively working in the vivarium since the work was completed. IEZEI Sent: Thursda Ma 12, 2011 05:20 PM To: Subject: vivarium case You informed me back in the fall that HVAC work was scheduled for the vivarium. Has this work been completed? DSAT mission: We regulate the possession. use. and transfer of select agents and toxins and the importation of etiological agents. hosts. and vectors of human disease to protect the public health in the United States. This document Is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protected. privileged. or con?dential. and it should not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. if you are not the intended recipient. any diasemination. distribution. or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this document in error. please notify.r the sender immediately and destroy the original. Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. USE I I From: Ears: Sent: Thursda October 28, 2010 3:03 PM To: cocroeHPRrosmSubject: Noti?cation of Facility Project [13:13:46.2 LI SC. The purpose of this correspondence is notify DSAT of a scheduled wort-t project for our Building mam; Vivarium. The project is set to commence in early November 2010 and should be completed by January 29. 2C 1 El. Please see attachment for scope of work. No animal holding 'areas will be occupied during theduration of the project. Work will not begin until such time as the Office of Health, Safety and Environment (OSHE) has decontaminated the space. OSHE decontamination activities are scheduled to begin on Monday. November 1, 2010. as. Project-P208945. .. Respectfully submitted, Hair? .12 U5 C. 5 2523m- US 0 ?262alh2 The existing Building EVivarium consists of eight U?i?fgg?z each of which has an ure Room. The Vivarium also has two additional Procedure a and so on Spaces, including a cage staging area, and showering and i use? 252 are arranged in two rows of four separated by a common The current air balance relationship is such that the Procedure are negative to a Clean Corridor, ??mgag are negative to the Procedure and the I r' I I of this project will alter the air ?ow arrangement such EYE-.42 . . . 2am; . be made osrtive; therefore,- no longer be called a and the new ?grey? Corridor The imnroi ement will eliminate the collective mixing of Lt Rgom air in the existing mus-442 LI so a 252mm;- The scope of work to accomplish this modi?cation includes partial removal of exhaust air in the cage staging area, adding supply air in the existing (new ?grey? corridor), and rebalancin _all as necessary. Architectural modi?cations include removin existing door which separates existing Clean Corridor?from the existing LIE-0 eman- and the opening will be ?lled with concrete masonry and a new window. A new concrete masonry wall will be installed to separate the new ?grey? corridor from the existing cage staging area. A new ?ber reinforced polyester (FRP) door will be installed in this wall. [DHinle ?39 USE. 252 From: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Thursda Fe ry23.20121:16 PM To: Subject: FW: air ?ow just want to keep you in the loop. From: Williams, Allison Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 1:15 PM To: (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Scarborough Dixon, Kismet L. (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Subject: air ?ow what's the next step to address the continued airflow issues in building As of today, {maxim 252mm reported as having reversal issues. Please advise. Thanks. ?f??son 'Wif?ams 1600 Clifton Road, MS G-15 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 404-639-3316 [of?ce] 404-235?5162 {fax} are still being la Use-9 USE. 262 From: Williams, Allison Sent: Thursd23, 2012 1:21 PM To: Subject: RE: air flow According to the staff they are lasting for a few seconds or so and are consistently occurring. From: raga-?g Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:17 PM To: Williams, Allison Subject: RE: air flow Thank you, Dr. Williams. Are these reversals momentary or sustained airflow reversals? use. 262alh} From: Williams, Allison Sent: Thursda Fe ruar'yr 23, 2012 1:16 PM To: Subject: FW: air ?ow just want to keep you in the loop. From: Williams, Allison Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 1:15 PM To: (cocrocorJ/osus} Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: air flow U.S.C. 252301} ,r what's the next step to address the continued airflow issues in building if; . reported as having reversal issues. As of today. uses 262a?h} are still being Please advise. Thanks. ?f?lson Wif?ams 1600 Clifton Road, MS 6-15 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 404-639-3315 {of?ce} 404-235-5162 {fax} I Linriwrieml From: Williams. Allison Sent: Tuesda Febr ry 21, 2012 11:34 AM To: Subject: Fw: Air?ow in Hi I'm not sure ifanyone has made you aware. So I thought I would forward this to you just in Allison Sent: Thursda February 16, 2012 04:13 PM To: Ema (CDC/ocooiosns} Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Scarborough Dixon, Kismet L. Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Subject: Air?ow in Good afternoon at al i This morning i was a part of an escorted group that walked through ofthe clean areas in the vivarium of Bidg. and wanted to make you all aware of a circumstance that the group encountered. As the group stood outside the door of in the clean corridor, the ARB technician inside opened the door to the animal room. As the door closed a very noticeable puff of air could be felt coming through the slit in the window out into the "clean" corridor. I was told by Kismet that this room does not house infected animals at the present time. However, there is a room with infected animals on this same corridor and if this is happening in that room, does feel that there is any risk of exposure to someone walking down that hallway without respiratory protection. Don't know if this was a fluke or the norm and the reason I?m commenting is one of the visitors seemed concerned and has been talking about it since we?ve come back. FYI Lbil?l Vision: To be the preeminent resource for safety and security of biological agents and toxins. Subject: Location: Start: End: Show Time As: Recurrence: Meeting Status: Organizer: Required Attendees: All, HOG Meeting - Feb 2 21 -- Room 1204A Thu 22.9012 9:00 AM Thu 2r2r2012 10:00 AM Tentative (none) Not yet responded Barrett, Timothy J. Collier,Vince (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) . . . Gumbis ie [cocrooronoex HoKillrnaster, uzmln van Leslie, Rita L. Pedone, James . - Powell, Steven L. {oocrocoorelr - Prohst, Paul E. (cocrocoorBFO); Scarborough Dixon, Kismet L. Singletary eaows, Kristi I. Walpole, Kenneth K. nqp"m Williams. Allison Zambuto, Laure R. Martin, Diane Attached are the minutes from the Jan and Dec meeting. We will vote to approve these so take a look. Also, I am attaching my semi-annual report to the HGC {Jan Nicholson). (meow uses 252m HI 1? Operations Operations Group Meeting roup Meeting A. HOG_Semlonnual. . . CI. 2623 Operations Group Meeting - - unusual: . 9:00-10:00 19, Room 117 Meeting Leader: '?iig?it?c' Type of meeting: Regular HOG Meeting. Recorder: Allison Williams . Attend I . I lbw: Paul Prob?, .- a I . i lust; we?" Erma?. IKenneth Walpole, 252mm:- I Laura Zambuto. . . rims-L 2 - I . LIP-llc_52 I 523:? toasts: low 45 Jets. 252mm 25.2th" [uJ-Irr 44 Lt: 3. - 1 2523 I 1? Allison Williams and ll cl 5- . . - 252mm . MINUTES [Dltd'Ald Agenda item: Minutes approval Presenter: 4.32. I Discussion: Deferred until next scheduled meeting - Agenda item: Program/Support updates Presenter: ALL BFO: Vivarium; All BF 0 activities went as planned during the vivarium shut down. Talk of modifying the pre?ltersfor ease of maintenance was discusmd. Air?ow testing?went well, however it was revealed that an entire suite (two rooms adjacent to each other) can?t come down without a disruption of air?ow._ In order to perform routine maintenance each room will have to be brought down individually. There were issues found with the air?ow in the autoclave area. The window slot to the change room area'is being changed tc-a smaller size in efforts to address the air?ow issue. There is additional wiring needed for the fire alarm system (about 2 day?s work needed). Personnel need entry to the side of cage wash to complete the ?re alarm wire repairs.? There is also a pending work order for a phone line to be installed in the grey corridor. All should still be onsehedule forrcopening on or near Monday,..lanuar5r 9m. ?nagging: i had an issue with clogged supply ?lters. There is speculat'on it may be due to the construction from across the street, however no continued cause evident. should be back on line today, January 5m. There were issues found during power testing last month (December). The cause of the power issues were determined to be a faulty breaker. The breaker will be replaced and. should not cause an}.r disruption of work. No retest required after installation of the replacement breaker. . DSATTUSDA-APHIS inspectors consideredthe space for SA registration. The report will be submitted to DSAT and it is reve all requirements were satisfactorily met. provided requested information to OSEP regardin needs for smartcard users in the 3 z. i but hasn?t otten aresponse. SA tomeet with OSEP to explore recent card reader failures in building Discussion regarding the decommissioning of the vivarium wash stations took place. Several were unsure as to when the stations were actually decommissed. It was stated the wash stations have been in a decommissioned status since the vivarium ?rst opened. Both DSAT and IACUC have both done several inspections and the decommissioned wash stations were not previously cited as a violation. OSHE states as long as PAPRs are required for work in that space. decommissioned wash stations are ?ne. However, the stations MUST be recerti?ed annually when the labs are brought down for routine maintenance a I. he stations must be working and available for use by personnel performing the maintenance. to inform staffthe vivarium will be open for business on Monday, January Discussion regar ing malfunctioning card readers took place. All have been replaced and are now Functioning proper] . Unsure as to the cause of the malfunctioning card readers. Speculation is software issues. SA as meeting scheduled with OSEP in efforts to address the card reader problems. i rmrsiaz use. 252arhso. undergomg m1n1-decon to remove equ1pment. IS functi mn?g as a cold The lab is currently conducting telemetry implantation procedures in the [(31245 space. No representation present Logging Recently completed 3659-33 DSAT inspection. Currently awaiting report which is due near end of January. Preliminary testing was conducted to investigate the theory that an overload of suits caused a pressure alarm back in October. The test didn?t reproduce the alarm. but did pressurize the room. BFO plans to repeat the test in February with a full @beo) in order to monitor the BAS during the testing. Test to take about 30 min. BF 0 would like to use this testing to - - lish a limit of how many can work in the space without causing disruption in Egg? res. personnel are working with OSHE to remove formalin ?xed tissues from the 3552-3-53 space. There was a question about leaving the lids on or off. OFHE advised lids need to remam on. The issue of funding for Micro-Chem rem nresolved. would like to get an estimate of what the cost is to maintain the chemical. manager to pass on cost estimate and contact information For 2011 it cost about $8000. However, some was left over from the previous year. There is a potential to run out of MicroC-hem by the end of the month or early next month. usewere} Low humidity readings in animal room. The space was desrgned a mechanism to supply humidity to the space. BF 0 states there are at least 2 options: I. Add humidity to house system 2. Purchase an in?room humidi?er andr'or wall mounted unit. ARB will take readings at the cage level (if possible) to determine environmental parameters in the microenvironment (inside the cage). According to the manufacturer via ACUPO of?ce, there is a difference between the actual exhaust reading and the environment inside the cage. Please see page 139-140 of The Guide. Humidity recommendations are at room level and specifications are for HVAC systems for animal areas. TB: Anticipate starting new experiments near the end of February. Still researching the best aerosol chamber to meet research need and satisfy safety requirements. RABIES: No representation present ARE: Personnel need to start process of reader access to SA: ReSponse going forward for Request was made for newl [bi-t3; :12 LI 252nm} so. 262mm I :l to attend the HOG. Transition to take place by the end of January. Publication of the ?nal rule expected in ebruary-2012. During the exit interview, DSAT clari?ed expectations on incident reporting. Loss of primary containment and an),r occupational exposure or potential exposure is considered a reportable incident. DSAT expects there to be a system in place to track and document incidents internally. ACUPO: governance counsel las tasked a subcommittee to draft procedures for space allocation for animal areas. The manager will send draft forward for HOG to review and er provide an update next meeting. OSHE: Nothing to report. OSEP: No representation present i if t" - Operations Group Meeting 9:00-10:00 19, Room 116 Meeting called by: Type of meeting: Regular HOG Meeting Recorder: Allison Williams Attendees; 'Di'ii'iff-l-i-L ?uwardj masseuse 5252th Laura Zamhuto; I '??cli?g'izlel ma?a"; qI I I Allison Williams, Lindsay Killmaster, Donne. lWarren, Jim Pedant-s Ivan Kuzmin MINUTES Agenda item: Minutes approval Presenter: - Discussion: Approved pending correction to 11!03f2011 minutes regarding form name. Conclusions: All approved (from last 3 meetings) Agenda item: BFO activities (Vivarium shutdown, autoclaves) Presenter: Discussion: BFO is prepared. Monday, Dercember'S?I is the scheduled decon day. BFO plans to conduct a series of tests that will help to determine iEan annual shutdown is truly required. These tests may help determine if the vivarium can go a longer period of time between shutdowns. Tests should con?rm if HEPAs can be serviced in phases. However, if this is found to be the case, there is a need for coordination from programs 'to ensure annual certi?catidns of primary containment equipment is maintained. Plans during shutdown also include some adj ustme I to the air?ow in the incinerator'room (putting more air into that space). Since the building incinerator will remain in use during the shutdown, BF 0 will coordinate with ARE to schedule work for this area. Additional plans include making that will allow a decrease in energy use while the incinerator is NOT in use; The exhaust filters in the animal holding rooms need to be replaced during the shutdown. OSHE requests that ARE remove and antnr?lave. the ijl3z-142 ?262alhl ?lters, paying particular attention to any 1visible-build up in the ?lters located in the rooms. BFO to replace with clean ?lters after the decon. .l needs to access the space to make repairsfreplace old card readers. OSHE says they can enter after Wednesday, December 7m . Concerns were expressed about ensuring all facility related issues are identi?ed along the way and all areremaining engaged about what?s.been done to address the issue in the Future. Alsoneed to ensure all is documented. It was previously discussed that all glitches would be reviewed/discussed and follow-up provided where needed. A recentssituation involving mislabeled controls in the BAS was cited as an' example. made a request via OSHE that he would like to access the space during'the shutdown to allow the veterinary residents to familiarize themselves with the space. Conclusion: All is. on schedule for shutdown, decon, maintenance and miscellaneous punch items fire damper replacement in grey corridor). JCI techs should be able to enter space after Wednesday, December 7th to replace/repair old card readers. No objections request, SA reminds all that SA-registered rooms remain so during the shutdown and sign-infect procedures apply. Action items: Need to discuss the need for exhaust ?lters going forward; need to establish a system for tracking all incidents (facility issues. program issues, and safet OSHE to follow up M33112 equest from Ito access the area during the shutdown; 3532 to be registered to Ci uses 262301} (b}[3}142 Agenda item: Smartcards for uses computers Presenter: [bil3533a?ihi'c'? 2523(h} Discussion: Programs expressed concerns regarding the requirement for use of the SmartCard for computer access in the containment areas. There is no practical manner to dccontaminate a smartcard during exit from the laboratory. Seeking guidance on weather on SmartCard could be issued per lab to remain inside the laboratory at all times OR weather or laboratorians will have to be issued a smartch for use in each laboratory. Conclusions: OSEP unable to provide resolutionfguidance at this time. The new system is still undergoing testing and no set date for CDC wide implementation has been given. Action item: OSEP to follow up with ITSO. Agenda item: Upcoming DSAT inspection Presenter: (metrizu-S-C-H?aim Discussion: Upcoming inspection is scheduled for December 12m-16m. Unsure if Friday will be needed. The debrie?ng may take place on Thursday afternoon. The plan remains for representatives from the HOG to seek clari?cation of irlcident reporting requirement. Members are encouraged to bring scenarios for discussion. Emanager is updating the operations manual. There will be a manual review. DSAT has already requested several tims in advance. 2 inspectors have been identi?ed. need to ensure all pre?entry requirements have been addressed with each. will get veri?cation of immunizations. There is a possibility that DSATIAPHIS may inspect the suite as well. 'll1_ I Conclusion: lnspection- December 12 In/Exit Brie?ng will be held in the lecture training mom on [Out of Scope-1 imam" Access issues for EID fellow ersonnel request that ARB not operate the auto clave in the thigh Flu: Th 3 monitor was displaying an alarm and for all to exit. The alarm is due to a 02 sensor i 113742 that?s been broken for a while. FSE says parts are in, but now must gain access to repair. There was a suggestion made to wait until the next shutdown. The sensor is faulty and resulting in the exit alarm. Communication issues are becoming a recurrent concern with FSE staff. This was evident during the decon of When Pl tried to exit, they were unable to exit via the normal egress. . They attempted to exit using the emergency button, but it didn?t work. SE was called to assist but were not helpful and didn?t seem to understand what was being asked of them. Newly installed unit has the potential to-shut off which would lead to death of the animals housed within if no alarm noti?cations are made. Action item: Need to establish a protocol to address enabling and disabling doors. Elf-3.5233 to investigate the recent communication issues with FSE during this process. hot as of yesterday. this to come down early next week Hit-Tuesday), Bats have successfully relocated to the ?Hf; 52523 campus. ?3??th??e-Ez?zam? I study ended November 141". Necropsy tables are an issue. The dorm draft . - . . . use work WE on the deeon of the eqmpment. There are 2 new short blocles:i ts-- 2525'?? would like at least one. Taking ownership will depend on when bats are out el-aiz May be able Inusraa to take them both. US is scheduled to come-in March (will be good because lab is down). 9?r?l'h1 DSAT is schedule . for December. table is leaking somewhere and needs to be addressed in March during the take down. to RABIES: No concerns or issues to report. ARE: No concerns or issues to report. ACUPO: Representative not present. OSEP: No issues or concerns to report SA: Seenotes for agenda item BFO: See notes for agenda item Agenda item: Miscellaneous updates Presenter: Discussion: medical emergency exercise went well. soggy-hie- to follow-up with an after action report. Motion was made to extend an open invitation to both were US 6 small-n . All voted to approve._ Qpe r?ati 0 I15 0G) Semiann-ual Repo?rt? February i4 to. December 31, 2011 To:' OID Governance Council (HGC) From: b_:l33:42 ?2523 hi HOG meetings HOG meetings continue to be well attended and meetings have been very productive. Following a HGC meeting held on 4f20i'2011, where it was recommended that the HOG make more decisions and documented them, the HOG charter was modified. The primary change was how decisions are made by the group, which will now use a majority vote instead of a consensus (75% of members for a quorum with a requirement of 2 or more opposing votes to defeat a motion). The frequency of reports to the HGC was changed from quarterly to semiannual. Important topics of discussion included: 1) use of the l=mergency Guidance and Information Sharing (AEGIS) system as a resource/tool for bag-102 emergency preparedness and response efforts, 2) updating the uses operations core nai ual and its adoption by all programs, 3) operati @5112 maintena 9:533 autoclaves, 4) SmartCard requirements for used of computers in use. 5) DSAT-related issues, and 6) improvements to operation. F: Occu am: and activities in the Sci-s and Vivarium use. 252mm M3142 - [slim ranch In early November, all of gag-gm? assugned new areas occupied and operational (hot), with all activities comp ely consolidated to the one have operated without issue. This change marked the first time that the [Wu-i342 - - - . [b?t3i:42 uses use. gza and Vivarium were totally occupied and operational. [Note i 2mm, and vivarium are no longer operational; as of early May, spaces have be-n oecontam noted and select agent registrations have been removed] A colony of bats (Roussetus aegiptiacus) from Uganda was established in the Vivarium. Following trapping, testing, and a month quarantine in Uganda (all from mid May to early August), bats were transported to CDC and housed in the Vivarium. . quarantine period and additional testing, the mien; was transferred to the facility in late November for maintenance in yes-p; space witpractices. uses 2528i?? Divisio Use of the main lab (for imaging studies and to address Crowding problerms contine without issue. In August, a request for additional space in the ivarium was made and a room was approved for use (HGC decision on 9/26/11). The program will occupy this area when the facility returns to operation in early January 2012 (following maintenance shutdown) and DSAT APHIS .3 pp roval is received. U.S.C. . . i. . ?s2ezami Erogram Normal operations and shutdowns ofl Isurtes have taken pl without inci ent. In .ram activities completely removed its stocks from the ml?i?u's'ow?am to their iazami suite. A large collaborative study with was successfully HEW ed (from early Cictober'to mid Novemer 0 test the rcacy the drug In nonhuman primates infected Rabies Program In late October, the rabies program use their assigned area to screen specimens for and to also amplify a stock virus preparation. Work was completed priOr to the December shutdown of the Vivarium. I lab underwent regular shutdown in June for maintenance and activities have been proceeding without incident. Work in the Bid Vivarium is being performed, but their assigned space has not been registered with DSAT. 1 Vaccine studies WWUISG eted in May and the program has consolidated their work to only one area ?262aihi previously, was also in use). Aerosol and pathogenesis studies are planned for 2012. 2 Operational Status of the Complex The and Vivarium is now fully occupied and operational, which has resulted in the need for additional efforts and resources to keep the facilities functioning. HOG discussions have been important in keeping all staff informed and coordinated in keeping the facilities functioning normally. Following completion of the iil'ivarium air flow redirection project (January 2011), the. facility has operated as designed and without issue. The modification has had a very positive impact on biosafety and ease of use (particularly for ARB staff). On December 5, the facility was decontaminated for its yearly maintenance, and during that time, tests were performed to determine if rooms could be isolated to determine if they can be individually decontamination (without impacting on air flow to other areas). It appears that this may be possible, which would allow for longer periods between shutdowns of the entire facility (and avoiding or minimizing interruptions), but a decision to change the current maintenance schedule has not been made. - One aspect of the operation of the facilities that has been challenging has been the need to increase and control humidity levels in animal holding areas (especially for nonhuman primates). FMEO has been working with ARB to provide solutions, but the ability to provide and maintain humidity levels above 40% during colder months may be troublesome. Issues associated with the transfer of animals into Mir-l?USE-imaih' suites continues to be problematic (use of large autoclaves for transport iS sun not anowe by the Meetings with representative of the autoclave manufacturer (Getinge) have not resulted in a workable solution to ensuring that the hot-side autoclave door can be quickly opened in the event of a malfunction. However, there have been changes in Four Seasons Environmental support staff that has resulted in improved capabilities in autoclave operation and maintenance. Nevertheless, decontamination of fumigation rooms via vaporized hydrogen peroxide by OSHE staff will continue to be the only option for moving many of the animals into animal holding areas. DSAT inspection From Dec 2 to a ?Ci-i team conclu fed a scheduled insnecti'in of the SN . leis-.42 . .. . registered Us c: @252 reas 2523.11; Program and mfiiQUS-L-W?zaihr Branch) and is part of DSAT's effort to periorm yearly inspections 0 a mill les. nspectors examined program documents, processes, facilities, inventories, and also conducted interview with users and support staff. All?in-all, the inspection went very well with only a few minor issues reported and some suggestions for improvement. At the exit briefing, a very productive discussion session took place to clarify what expectations are regarding reportable incidents. _.Ii-r On December 12, DSAT and APHIS inspectors toured the Vivarium and the us: szeza suite noted above), prior to registeringfap?proving the space for work with strains. The inspection was uneventful and a final report is anticipated around after the first of the year. [bli3l-12 USE. ?2B2aihl Security, access, and emergency response mi The Vivarium was the last area of the Roybal Campus to have CardKey readers replaced with SmartCard readers, which was finished in December. The Internal Select Agents Program has modified the onlin access request forms to streamlined and documentation has been consolidated. Access issues have lessened as program and support staff gain experience in the process and associated requirements. [Out of Scope] I [?ntiw?rigiiu Write-gaum-t-f-t From: [cociocoorosspi Sent: Friday, February 2009 10:05 AM To: Sanders. Martin L. (CDCIOCOOIOHS cc: (cocrocoochHs); new (cocrocoorOHS); mg ma (cocrcmomczveo) Subject: FW: Request for Information Martin, Per e-mail betow. and per the attached. please provide me with the OHS written report of additional information requested by DSAT. Usually we have 10 days to respond to these types of requests for additional information. osnrmo. .. Many thanks, U.S.C. 252ath} OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. This document is. intended I'm tlic cxt?lmiw use i-l'lhu rcuipiuntfs?i nontch nhow It man contain sensitive that 15 protected. prii. ilt-gcd. or con?dential. anti shunld not he diswminatcd. distributed. or wpicd tn nut aiulhnrircrl In rat-in: such inILinnzuimi ?Emu are not the intomlcd on). disseminatian distribution. or copying strictly prohibited. if you think )uu have rot-cited this tlucumcnt in onur. pleas: nutll'} Iii: sender Immediately and dcs?lro} original. From: Sent: Frida Februa ZDDB 8:24 AM To: ht (sociocoorossp) Subject: RE: Recluset for Information cease I am more comfortable is OHS provides you with a detailed report. Have contacted Martin about this. From: ?3:912 "mm (co/crocooroseei Sent: Thursda February 26, 2009 4:29 PM To: Holmes, David (cocrocoorortS); mm [Emmocmcooiost Koch, Stephen H. (sociocoo/sro) Cc: Damon, Inger K. Em imam use. 5 252mm (CDCFOCOOIDSEP) 1 .. FEB. 26. 2009 i SELEET MEN 3 PROGRW in NC. 5364 Public Heaiih Service 5 a - I .. . Centers for Diana ae Gunlrpi and Prevention i i February 23. 2mm . 1 U333 ?2E2allu if i i i RE: Renaipt Form 3. Report nf Theft. Loss, ur Release of Select Agents and Toxins 1 Thank yen for providing DSAT a-aopy of the incidnl WWI Telaiing an event that seamed in th 3352557 laboraprr an February 12. 2mg, This event will baf?ed as an incident report by DSAT. As noted in the incident report aubmi?eti to the Director 01 CD0, {Page a with any additional you abtam regarding oiher corrective actions Idenlr?ad hvthe ?5 33?? paratrons Gmup in arderio complete our records. I i 1 IIJPIE . i '1 document 1-5 intended far ma exciusl'm ultha fecipi?nlf?) named above. may curtain aana'rtiva Jnfu rmalinn that is pmlec?ted. privileged} or wn?dm?ai. and sham nut ha dimmlnaled. disl?hu?ted. or copied ta perm: not aulhoriz ad to rename such infarmalian. If you are ml the redpiamis]. any dissernina than: diatribulian. or coming Habit-.115: prohibited. If you think you I1 aw [attained [his document in armr. pin-nae nulify sender immediately and dim}; the original. i i i a? .ru?uru?a-r?hhur gum? - F: E1IP1PM Frnm: SHEENT Page @211 95 USE. 262 From: ESQ (cocrocoorosspi Sent: 26, 2009 4:23 PM To: Ham's? U-S-Ct?ma (CDCICOTPERIDSAT) CTR Co: I (hire) mini} cocrcoreearosm); I I I [qu? soap sandman. I Subject: Request for Information I received this facsimile a few minutes ago regarding the report we submitted for the event that occurred in our aboratory on February 12. 2009?. osnr- In reading through the correspondence. I have the following additional concerns that I would like clari?ed: The event is filed as an "incident report" by DSAT. Please ciarify the difference between an "incident report" and a Form 3 requirin report by DSAT. 1- Must I as an LUHJJH report incidents such as the one that occurred in our laboratory on February 12 to 9?92fl'll I appreciate your assistance with these additional concerns. Sincerely, [mm?12 use. ?262a[h} Customer Satisfaction Survey. 1 his document is Intended for the use nl'tht: "other! It may contain sensitive information that is protect-ad, privileged. or confidential. and it should not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons not authorich to receive such automation If you on: not the intended on); dissrminaliun. distribution. or Coming is strictly. prohibited. If too think you have received this document in error. plotter; notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. see ..-- 2523'? N65964: 1 meqi f? . DEPARTMENT at; seminal-:5 Public Health Service .r "in centers for Centre and Preventton February 23. 2009 US CI 5262mm RE: Reoelpt Form 3. Report ofThe?. Loss. or Release ofSe-teot Agents and Toxins 2 Thank you for proutotng .DSAT oopsI of the tholdent report relating on event that moment in the His?{555 bore Fehruary 12. zoos. This eventual! be ?ted as an report by DSAT. I As noted in the incident my on mtftet to the Director at CDC. (Peg with any additio I, :etion you obtain regatolng other not 'eetiue echoes Identi?ed by we. 42 2mm: Operattone Group {?25 9- e: in order to complete our records. I ?u I i 'n This do eument Le intended for the exalt-ewe use of the feotpfe mu) named above. It may euntaln eeneilim intenneoon the: is protected. uMegeuE or con?denual. e'nd it shouto not he diaeem meted. oiehtbuteo. or copieo to Demons not authorized to seceiue such attenuation. If you are not the intended meoemtnatton. diel?bu Hen. or copying 1's strictly prohibited. if you think you have received his uomnent tn anon-preset; notify 111% sender Immediate? and destroy the uriglnetum: ID: SPLGENT U.S.C. ?2623[h} From: BEE Sent: Wednesday. February 18. 2009 1:32 PM To: [bit?i ibit?i (CDCICOTPERIDSAT) Cc: [lenient (CDCICOTPERIDSAT) Porter. William Edwards, Jacqueline Subiect: RE: Building [bit3f-242U-S-C-?262athi Ilssue Good Afternoon Please ?nd attached a copy of the written report for the event reported in my e-maii dated Friday. February 13. 2009. 6:13 12FEBI39 too on Report Respectfully submitted, (mom use. is 252mm. OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. This dimmienl is intended fur the eseiusiw use of the reeipientis'} named above. It may contain sensitive inl'nn-nelion [hall is proteeled. privileged. or con?dential. and it should not he disseminated. distributed. or copied in persons not authorised to receive such if you are not the intended any dissemination, distribution or coming is strictly prohibited, If gnu think you have received this document in error. please nolil?} [he Sender immediately and destroy the nrigintll From: [bit?i thit?i ITI (LTR) Sent: ITuesda Febr ry 2009 11:55 AM To; . It! (coqocomossp) Cc: . I T) (cochoTPERmSATi Subject: RE: Building Issue I Thank you for reporting this incident. We will look for additional details to follow once your investigations are complete. [bit?i USE. 2?2ath} This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipientis) named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protected. privileged, or confidentiai. and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. If you are not the intended recipientis), any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this document in error. please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. Thank you. From: ?33952 Sent: =ridayI =ebruay 13, 2009 6:13 PM TD: rat-.19 nil-th19M (CWCOTPEWDSAU Cc: thit?i I (CDCJUCUOIOSEP): Popovic, Tanja Nicholson, Janet Edwards, Jacqueline (encrocooioSEP); Stevens, John R. (encrocoorosem; Chandler, George (cocrocooraFm; Bowen, Ken L. {cocrocoo/sFoi; Monroe, Steve CDC CCID Holmes, David Sanders, Martin L. Subject: Building sane Good Afternoon [b}[3}242 U.S.C. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide report to DSAT that individuals in the ?2aza[h} Bldgexperienced air?ow and decon shower dif?culties upon exiting the laboratory at approximately 4:05 pm on I?ebrua 1 09. It is reported that the difficulties experienced did not result in an overall compromise in containment in the laboratory or any potential release of agent from the laboratory. Additional details will be provided upon completion of the investigation by the Office of Health and Safety (OHS) and our Buildings and Facilities Of?ce Respectfully submitted, U.S.C. ?262a[h} DSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. 'Jiris document is intended for the exclusive use oi'llre recipientis} named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protected. privileged, or con?dential. and it should not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to perSons not authorized to receive such li?you are not the intended rccipientts), any dissemination, distribution. or copying is strictly prohibited. li'you think you have received this datumcnt in error, please notin the sender immediately and destroy the original. Controlled Unclassi?ed Information c: 52:32am. lunar-'42 US 0. 5 252m: To: Dr. Richard E. Besser Acting Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention From: Operations Group, in conjunction with the CDC Office of Health and Safety For Of?cial Use Only Controlled Unclassi?ed Information . . . . (mom . ILLS-C. [i I Inc'dent On February 12, 2009, an n. in the operation of the ma?eded thesuite (authorized for work with irus), which resulted in a momentary de?ation of a gasketed shower door leading into the outer clean area prior to chemical decontamination of the shower space. Account of the Incident Starting at amenMomchememMLEf land Rabies Branch and the CDC Assistant 2523i? ntere into the Building Ibii3i242 usr?' I lab. Their purpose for entry was to inventoryIWWLilia?262a transferred from he trundan earlier in the day. All manipulations were conducted in biological safety cabinets, no vials were opened or observed to be damaged or leaking and lab personnel disinfected work areas and hands according to established protocols. At 4:00 pm, when the inventory was completed, all four personnel entered into the decontamination shower and attempted to initiate an automated decontamination shower cycle. The cycle failed to initiate, and instead, the door leading into the clean side de?ated. Experienced lab workers realized that a problem had occurred and held the door closed until the gasket re-in?ated. Ultimately, all of the personnel exited the shower (te- lab) and cor Seasons Environmental (building support), the this] and the [an (we I The problem was quickly identi?ed - at approximately 1:00 pm that day, the buil . au oma on system computer system monitoring and controlling the building), failed to restore the decontamination shower operation to an enabled mode, after the lab brie?y disabled, and then the entire lab, except the shower, re-enabled. Normal operation of the decontamination shower was expeditiously re-enabled, and all personnel exited the lab following an appropriate decontamination process. u, up After the incident, the leg; ibii?i gig I one I Ebif?i [and [3?42 discussed the situation and deci ed to halt all entry into the laboratory until details of the incident could be investigated and a solution to the problem implemented. Corrective Actions The morning after the incident, a meeting of engineering, program, OHS, and management staff was condu An error in the BAS software was identified as the cause of the decontamination shower not being automatically re~enabled and was corrected. A decision was made to modify the BAS software code that same day to prevent such incidents and additional alarms have been added to notify engineering personnel. During this incident, program and support personnel acted appropriately, but continued eve-"ism" of staff the one" tion of the facility is needed and will take place. In addition, the WW Operations Group will analyze the incident and provide additional corrective actions to safeguard against future incidents in the my 262301} For Of?cial Use Only From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Good Afternoon mtcocmcoorosem Pride Februa 3, 2009 5:13 PM tblt?l I tbiEE} ?t (CDCICOTPERIDSAT) (CTR) Dorter, William Popovic. Tanja (bit?l thit?i (CDCIOCOOIOSEP): Chandler, George owen? . Monroe. Steve Holmes. David (CDCIOGOOIOHSI Sanders. 'tllartin L. Building Issue I - ?n oncdanet 52 0 3 USE. 262801} The purpose of this e-mail is to provide report to DSAT that individuals in th experienced airflow and decon shower difficulties upon exiting the laboratory at approximately 4:05 pm on Febr the difficulties experienced did not result in an overall compromise in containment in th 2009. It is reported that laboratory or any potential release of agent from the laboratory. Additional details will be provided upon completion of the investigation by the Of?ce of Health and Safety (OHS) and our Buildings and Facilities Of?ce (BFO). Respectfully submitted. [b}[3}142 U.S.C. 252301) OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. 'l?hig document i5 I'm- [hg exclusive of the rccipicntis] named above It may cuntuin sensilixc irlliirmauian that is protected. privileged. or con?dential. and it should not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information, It you on: not the intended recipientts). Emv dissemination. distribution. or Copying is strictly prohibited, ll?jtnu tI:inI-. [mu ham; rocctvul this document in error. please notify the sender immvdiatclg' and destroy the origiimi. .ql I Thursda Februaryr 12, 2009 7:38 PM USO. 262.301? t, u. U30. 2523 -. (coercc1o/chvso . Lam I David (cecrocoorOHS); (cociocooiosemMonroei Steve Koch, Stephen H. Cc: Sent: Thu Pet 19 19-1 :55 2009 Subject: FW: Ltsic'igsxiiza . I .5 I?ll . FYI - if you opened previous email, this one has the CORRECT content - the. other did not. toxin-'12 Per my conversation with Egg-Eat; a few moments ago. As well, (all), the lab was "red" indicating positive pressure when the shower door opening into the occured. No gaskets, other than the shower door to "hot lab" were observed to be down. in} As we have discussed no work with virus will proceed until we ascertain what may have occured. I am told will "test the systems" tomorrow. Also, all inventory tube handling accrued in and all tubes were intact, none broken, none with obvious organic materials on external surfaces. Cell is logic} inn-3 Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 6:02 PM To: Monroe, Steve (CDCICCIDIN CZV Olson, Victoria Braden, Zachary ott K. - had some problems with exit of lab to day - chemical shower not op cratin opening into clean area without a disinfectant run, then (repeatedly) chemical shower room going positive into lab with gasket deflation when deluge shower operated. . - i I Emoti?ed and twlt-Utlwd in etling Folks out with various suggested strategies to get shower! gasket do ors to function. Just off ccnf? call with my group, a and Steve Koch. Should be low risk, as no virus out oftubes. Inventoryr complete and. OK (the good news) . Will come in tnmurrow AM to discuss with 4 seasons {who were apparently unaware Ufa]! this) and engineering. my shall and OHS. Kudos to Vicki, Zach, Scott and Mike. [b}[3}242 U.S.C. ZEEalh} From: (cosiocoomsaei Sent: Thursday. February 12. 2009 7:43 PM To: Po er William (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Subject: Fw (biggies-C- -just so you don't get hit with this from top down. see below. This is still under investigation by OHS and FMEO. Bod no report has been made to DSAT--still to be determined whether or not a report will be necessary since no live virus work (no open vials) was occurring in the lab yet. No live work will occur until this problem has been demonstrated to be resolved. Sent using BlackBerry From I To: Holmes, David Monroe, Steve Koob, Stephen H. Cc: Olson, Victoria Sent: Thu FP 2009 Subject: FW: ill} FYI il'you opened previous email. this one has the CORRECT content - the other did not. Per my conversation With BEE a few moments ago. As well, {all}. the lab was "re: indicating, positive pressure when the shower door opening into the lab occured. No gaskets. other than the shower door to "hot lab" were observed to be down. In?! As we have discussed no work with virus will proceed until we ascertain what may have occured. I am told [(133213 will "test the systems" tomorrow. Also. all inventory tube handling occured in and all tubes were intact. none broken. nrme with ohvioue organic materials on external surfaces. tell is [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 252a[h) Messavem? Sent: Thursday. February 12. 2009 6:02 PM To: Monroe. Steve IOlson. Victoria Braden. Zachary Smith- Scott K. 1 - . I: Sublet? had some problems with 6in of' lab today - chemical shower not opct'atina opening into clean area without a disinfectant run. then (repeatedly) chemical shower room going positive into lah with gasket de?ation when deluge shower operated. lg] mow Sanchez noti?ed and in vetting, folks out with various suggested strategies to get showerfgaskct doors to function. Just offeonl?call with my group ma and Steve Kooh. Should be 10w risk. as no virus out oflubes. Inventory complete and OK (the good news) . Will come in tomorrow AM to discuss with 4 seasons (who were apparently unaware ofall this) and engineering, my staff and OHS. Kudos 10 Vicki, Zach, Scot! and Mike. [b}[3}u242 USE. 2523[h} I From: (cocirocooiosem Sent: Friday. February 13, 2009 2:27 PM To: Damon. Inger K. Holmes, David Cc: Monroe Steve icocrcmomczveo); Porter, William (cocrocoorosem; rcocrocoorosIsa) Subject: [Decon Shower Issues and I spoke with Bill Porter this morning regarding yesterday's issue with the decon shower in the Bldg : . rased on a follow-up phone call from David Holmes about an hour ago we may be filing a Form 3 after further OHS follow-up. if it is determined that the occurrence does not meet parameters for Form 3 filing under the regulatory requirements, El and I agree that our of?ce should submit a memorandum to DSAT early next week describing the occurrence and our planned follow-up actions in an effort to ensure there is no appearance of concealing a facility- related event from DSAT. I'll be seeking written input from you to assist in the construction of the memo if it turns out that we do not ?le the Form 3. On another note. if you have had any discussion regarding how this development may impact the: visit, has requested that you keep us posted of any decisions that have been made. l'm sure this will probably be discussed at our meeting next week. Regards, OSEP Customer Satisfaction Sunrev. This document is intended for the exclusive use otthe named above. It may uman sensitive intiurmutum ?till it pn?ateeted. privileged. or con?dential. and it should not be disseminated. disu ibute-J. or copied to persons not uullmrued to receive such [two are not [he intended rceipienlts}. any dissemination, dislrihulion. or copying is strictly ptuilihitcd If},an think you have received this [Imminent in t'nur. pie-:54; until]. the sender immediately and (IL-elm; tlu: original SITE 3-: (encrocomosee) Friday. February 13, 2009 5:02 PM Holmes, David Porter, William David, has just Called me to indicate that Martin Sanders has conveyed information ofthe lab incident to the CDC Acting Director, and that the Director has mandated a written report by COB on Tuesday. is concerned about the precident that will beset if we report this to DSAT since there was no release of SA (by risk'assessment) and overall containment of the laboratory was not compromised. Also George Chandler is in my office now seeking additional information about the occurrence. He wants to be sure that you have interviewed the BFO staff (Steve Koob and Ken Bowen} as well. i still plan to send a brief e-mail to DSAT alerting them that we had a facility-related issue on exiting the lab with decon shower and airflow function which is currently under investigation. - Sent using BlackBerrv me: om] Mrcocrocoorosem Sent: Friday, February 13. 2009 5:14 PM To: Chandler. George George. This just came in from team that was in the laboratory at the time of the dif?culty. Thought you might find it helpful. of Incident Regards. [b}i3}:42 use. ?252arhi OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. 'l'his doeumenl is intended For Lite exclusive Use of the recipienttsi named above. it may contain senoitit?e in formation that is protected. privileged. or con?dential. and it sltnuld not be disseminated- distributed. or Copied to persons :nnl authorized to receive such ll?ymt are not the intended rccipientlsi. any dissemination. distribution. or copying is Strictly prohihited. If you think you have received this document in error. pleat-st: notify the sender immedialely and destroy the original. musing Record of Incident February 12, 2009 SE. 2523mm On February 12, 2009, the above listed laboratorians along with the 252mm} I Iliyl3ii42 LIONEL-12 2E2al'h:~ Ibit?l entered into the ?ii?T? 4? space of building 252mm "gaggle room to conduct an of?cial inventory of the Itt'fd' 4.1 5.6. us . After successful completion, the Iaboratorians attempted to exit A. 5 2 hrough the chemical shower where the-following events occurred: All four persons entered the chemical shower. The gasketed door from the Iwas properly closed and sealed by evidence of the light indicator turning from green to red. onncl then pressed the ?door open? button next to the gasketed door leading from the chemical shower tothe suit room in order to initiate the automatic chemical shower. The-automatic chemical shower did not start and the light indicator turned from red to yellow indicating the gasket of the door from the chemical shower to the suit room was beginning to deflate. Upon noticing this, personnel physically held the door shut between the chemical shower and the suit room until the door gasket rein?ated and the light indicator turned from green to red. While the gasket was de?ated, light from-the suit room was visible in the chemical shower however the door was never open. After ensuring the gasketed door from the chemical shower to the suit room was properly sealed, personnel attemptedto initiate the automatic chemical shower by pressing the ?door open? button next to the gasketed do or between the chemical shower and the 5? Again, the automatic chemical shower did not start and the light indicator turned from red to yellow indicating the gasket of the door from the chemical shower to th i 5 was beginning to de?ate. Upon noticing this, personnel physically the door shut between the chemical shower and the 23 until the door gasket rein?ated and'the light indicate green to red. After ensuring the gasketed door from the chemical shower tot . was properly sealed, personnel began using the emergency- deluge Microchem). Approximately 20 30 seconds into the 5% MiCrochem delu 3e, the gasketcd door from the chemical shower to "'33'3'342 U55- 5 2523?? burst open forcefully. Personnel physically shut the door between the chemical shower and thel land held it shut until the door gasket rein?ated and the light indicator turned from green to red. After ensuring the gasketcd door from the chemical shower to the one us gzazam} - was properly sealed, personnel again used the emergency 1 uge Microchcm). Immediately, the gasketed door from the chemical shower :urst open force?illy again. Personnel I [h'if3li42 USE. 252mm USC. 262mm to the mus; 42 us [3 a sesame physicall shut the door between the chemical shower and th 5:33.53? land held it shut until the door gasket reinflated and the light indicator turned from green to red. 8. After ensuring the gasketed door from the chemical shower to the was properly sealed, personnel again used the emergency eluge Microchem). Immediately, the gasketed door from the chemical shower to thel Iburst open Forcefully for a third time. Personnel hvsicall shut the door between the chemical shower and the containment and held it shut until the door gasket rein?ated and the light indicator turned from green to red. 9. After ensuring the gasketcd door from the chemical shower to the was properly sealed, personnel again used the emergency deluge Microchem). Personnel attempted to physically hold the gasketed door from the chemical shower to the Eb}t3}142 u.s.c.s2s2atm shut but it burst open with enough force that personnc could not keep the door shut. 10. Personnel entered the [blt3li42U.S.C.?2?2arh} Ito call Four Seasons about the problem. At this time. the gasketed door from the chemical shower to the WW 2523"? was left open while we tried to address the issue. 1 1. Personnel attempted to conununicate the issue to Four Seasons. th uses 2E2ath} [523231 ?523 i1 and the Occupational Health and Sater representative usbi?illggeg a. At this time. personnel noted that the air pressure ala?s?h lue light} were blinking. Also, the monitor screen showed the ?5-9-5 main laboratory and procedure rooms and chemical showe The autoclave room, animal room. andmot stayed blue. i. The alarm message on the monitor screen read animal room humidity non-critical alarm". ii. All Four personnel moved into the main 52m and closed the gasketed door between the (more uses 252m and the chemical shower in an effort to normalize pressure within the laboratory. The main laboratory then quickly changed From ?red? to "green" on the monitor screen according to the pressure color chart. 12 - I I ?erring. Wealled personnel within the and suggested: a. Personnel exit two at a time i. Four Seasons would activate the automatic chemical shower while the first two were within the chemical shower. ii. After the ?rst two exited into the suit room. the second two would enter the chemical shower 1. Personnel would activate the chemical shower bypass From the suit room. 2. Personnel would repeat this activation two more times and then exit the chemical shower. l3. ?lhe first two personnel entered the chemical shower and ensured the gasketed door was sealed. Four Seasons attempted to activate the automatic chemical shower through the Building Automation System (BAS) but only the water cycle occurred. a. Personnel used the emergency deluge Mi crochem) two times b. Personnel then pressed ?door open? button next to the gasketed door leading from the chemical shower to the suit room to exit the chemical shower but then the automatic chemical shower initiated. c. After completion of the full automatic chemical shower cycle (7 minutes), personnel exited into the suit room. '14. The second two personnel then entered the chemical shower and ensured the 15 gasketed door was sealed. The chemical shower bypass was then activated by personnel from the suit room. Following the short 2 minute cycle, personnel attempted to activate the automatic chemical shower by pressing the ?door open? button next to the gasketed door between the chemical shower and the suit room (since the automatic chemical shower cycle had just previously worked). Theautomatic chemical shower did not start and the light indicator turned from red to yellow indicating the gasket of the door from the chemical shower to the suit room was beginning to de?ate. Upon noticing this, personnel physically held the door shut between the chemical shower and the suit room until the door gasket rein?ated and the light indicator turned from green to red. .- The chemical shower bypass was again activated for a second time by personnel from the suit room. During this cycling, personnel also used the emergency deluge Mieroehern) as an extra precaution. 16. Following completion of this cycling, personnel exited the chemical shower to personal showers. I From: (cocrocoorosem Sent: Friday, February 13. 2009 5:19 PM To: Williams. Jeffery Bowen. Ken L. Cc: Cha Iggm?f ge (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Porter. William (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Subject: U-S-Cih?fm ssue Je?ernyen. I have been in conversation with Geor Chandler this afternoon regarding the airflowfdecon shower issue in the 3.3-3.5; yesterday afternoon. Them Program has developed the attached first-hand account of what occurred. George has asked that I pass this along to you for your information. Ig?le - Incident Sincerely. (more use. 2522mm OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survev. this document is intended for t?t?iilu?itt leiL? ol?liu: named iihOVL? II lTIil)'L't1Il13ll1 hcn?ilih: iufnrninliun Ihnl is protected. privileged or con?dential. and ll should not be disseminated. or copied to persons not autltonzcd to rcucnu such Information. Il'jmu on: not the llilL?i?IdL?d racipicutlsl. an) dissemination. dixlribution, nr Cup} illg is strictly prohibited If )mll think you hm ruccixcd this (lucumuul in error- plum: until} the sun.ch immediame and 1hr: original. Record olncident February 12, 2009 I LLSC. ?252alhj I On February 12, 2009, the above listed laboratorians along with the?gfs?am I mitt-?42 U5 5 3523? Ill 1 entered into the 'b'l?i space of building I 43 2523"? I "5 mm; 5s to conduct an of?cial inventory of the-l U50 @2523'?: IAfter successful completion, the laboratorians attempted to exit 3 through the chemical shower where the following events occurred: 1. All four persons entered the-chemical shower. The gasketed door from the more use s252a-h: lwas properly closed .and sealed by evidence of the I light indicator turning from green to red. 2. Personnel then pressed the ?door open? button next to the gasketed door leading from the chemical shower to the suit room in order to initiate the automatic chemical shower. 3. The automatic chemical shower did not start and the light indicator turned from red to yellow indicating the gasket of the door from the chemical shower to the suit room was beginning to de?ate. Upon noticing this, personnel physically held the do or shut between the chemical shower and the suit room until the door gasket rein?ated and the light indicator turned from green to red. While the gasket was de?ated, light from the suit room was Trisible in the chemical shower however the door was ?never open. 4. After ensuring the gasketed door from the chemical shower to the suit room was properly scaled, personnel attempted to initiate the automatic chemical shower by pressing the ?door op en? button next to the gasketed door between the chemical shower and thel Again, the automatic chemical shower did not start and the light indicator ttu'ned from red to yellow indicating the gasket of the door from the chemical shower to the 2526 1h} . .. was beginning to de?ate. Upon noticing this, personnel held the door shut between the chemical shower and the 42 5* 2523 until the deer gasket rein?ated and light in water fumes from green to red. 5. After ensuring the gasketed door from the chemical shower to the . 2:235; was properly sealed, personnel began using the emergency deluge Microchem). 6. Approximately 20 30 seconds into the 5% Microchem deluge, the gasketed door from the chemical shower to the air-42 use. s2?'2am. burst open forcefull . Personnel physically shut the door between the chemical shower and the and held it shut until the door gasket rein?ated and the light indicator turned from green to red. After ensuring the gasketed door from the chemical shower to the ?3:934? Mime I: was properly scaled, personnel again used the emergency uge Microcheml. Immediately, the gasketed door from the chemical shower to the ?318142 S-C- {a 252W burst open forcefully again. Personnel sicall shut the door between the chemical shower and the nd held it shut until the door gasket rein?ated and the light indicator turned from green to red. 8. After ensuring, the gasketed door From the chemical shower to the was properly sealed. personnel again used the emergency deluge Microchem). Immediately. the gasketed door from the chemical shower to the burst open forcefully for a third time. Personnel I hysicall shut the door between the chemical shower and the containment I l?lg?aga?i' land held it shut until the door gasket reinflated and the light indicator turned from green to red. 9. After ensuring the gasketed door from the chemical shower to the 523m was properly sealed. personnel again used the emergency deluge Microchem}. Personnel attempted to physically hold the gasketed door from the chemical shower to the I shut but it burst open with enough force that personnel could not keep the door shut. 10. Personnel entered the tblt3li42U.S.C.?262arh} lto call Four Seasons about the problem. At this time. the gasketed door from the chemical shower to the was left open while we tried to address the . 11. Personnel attempted to communicate the issue to Four Seasons. the I [bit3t42 U.S.C.?2628thl I agaut?t' I and the Occupatignal Health and Safety representative U?l?igl?52 (??li??aufc' a. At this time. personnel noted that the air pressure alarms (blue light) were blinking. Also. the monitor screen showed the main 5235' and procedure rooms and chemical shower as ?red?. The autoclave room. animal room. andofm stayed blue. i. The alarm message on the monitor screen read animal room humidity non-critical alarm". ii. All Your personnel moved into the main laboratory and closed the gasketed door between thel (htt3t42U-5-C-?2523l?) and the chemical shower in an effort to normalize pressure within the laboratory. The main laboratory then quickly changed from ?red? to "green" on the monitor screen according to the pressure color chart. 12. After conferring, MEI called personnel within the and suggested: a. Personnel exit two at a time i. Four Seasons would activate the automatic chemical shower while the first two were within the chemical shower. ii. After the ?rst two exited into the suit room. the second two would enter the chemical shower 1. Personnel would activate the chemical shower bypass from the suit rootn. 2. Personnel would repeat this activation two more times and then exit the chemical shower. 13. The ?rst two personnel entered the chemical shower and ensured the gasketed door was sealed. Four Seasons attempted to activate the automatic chemical 3?3- I4. 15. shower through the Building Automation System (BAS) but only the water cycle occurred. a. Personnel used the emergency deluge Microchem) two times b. Personnel then pressed ?door Open? button next to the gasketed door leading from the chemical shower to the suit room to exit the chemical shower but then the automatic chemical shower initiated. c. After completion of the full automatic chemical shower cycle (7 minutes), personnel exited into the suit room. The second two personnel then entered the chemical shower and ensured the gasketed door was sealed. The chemical shower bypass was then activated by personnel from the suit room. Following the short 2 minute cycle, personnel attempted to activate the automatic chemical shower by pressing the ?door open" button next to the gasketed door between the chemical shower and the suit room (since the automatic chemical. shower cycle had just previously worked). The automatic chemical shower did not start and the light indicator turned from red to yellow indicating the gasket of the door from the chemical shower to the suit room was beginning to de?ate. Upon noticing this, . personnel physically held the door shut between the chemical shower and the - suit room until the door gasket rein?ated and the light indicator turned from green to red. The chemical shower bypass was again activated for a second time by personnel from the suit room. During this cycling, personnel also used the emergency deluge Microchem) as an extra precaution. 16. Following completion of this cycling, personnel exited the chemical shower to personal showers. From: BREE cocrocoorosse; Sent: Frida Februa 13, 2009 5:27 PM To: Holmes, David Monroe, Steve (CDCICCIDINCZVEDE Porter, William (CDCIOCOOFOSEP) Please see below for the e-mail report I intend to submit to DSAT today regarding the occurrence of Feb 12th. Let me know if you would like any changes before I send: The purpose of this e-mail is to provide report to DSAT that individuals in theldg experienced air?ow and decon shower difficulties upon exiting the laboratory at approximately 4:05 pm on February 12, 2009. The dif?culties experienced did not result in an overall compromise in containment in thaboratory or any potential release of agent from the laboratory. Additional details will be provided upon comp ton of the investigation by OHS and BFO. Thank you in advance for your support. [b}(3}242 U.S.C. 252301} Customer Satisfaction Survey. This document is intended for the exclusive use of the reeipienttsi named above. It may contain sensitite iuliirmatinn littll is protected. prii ileged. or con?dential. and it should not he disseminuled. distributed or copied to persons not authonzed to receive such information. If you are not the intended reeipicnliSJ. ?113' diSSEntintlliun. distribution. or coming to strictly prohibited. If gnu think you have received this document in error. please notify the sender immediater and destroy the original. From: Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 5:57 PM To: Chandler. George Bowen, Keri L. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: First hand account of 53:15 incident 2-12-2009 Another tidbit of information from personnel in the lab at the tin-lemsee e?maiis below. use. 262aih} OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survelr. Thl? document is intended for the exclusive use of [he recipicnlisl named ohm-t- II ma} sciisilliu information illiil l5 privileged. or confidential. iind it should not bi: disseminated. distributed. llIl' curricd poisons not lo ouch inl'orliliiliilli {I?ll an: nm the mic-nch 5 l. ill'l} dissemination. distribution. or cup}. ing IS Sll?IL?ll} prohibited ll'jruu lliinli you have received thi:r document in error. please until} the sench immediately and destroy till: original From: Sent: Frida February 13, 2009 5:52 PM To: lbilewU-S-C-w?elm coclcc1omczveo) lea! - - uczvco) Holme ,aliid (cocloccoiOHS); Koob, Stephen H. (coclocooroscp); BEE (coclocooiosem; Phill? oman (CTR) Subject: Re: First hand account 0 incident 2-12-2009 I recall that while we were working, the chemical shower room was blue and blinking on the LCD. EEZI Fro: mgeggie-C- To: (coo/ceiomczvao); - (cocroc00/0H5); Holmes, David (coo/ocoolOHS); Koob, Stephen H. (cociocooiossp); mm. Phillips, Roman (cocrocooreFO) (CTR) Sent: Fri Feb 13 1?:32:53 2009 Subject: Re: First hand account of ncident 2-12-2009 2628th No, prior to our initial attempt to exit, I recall that the LCD monitor showed the suite to be creeni'blue. I do not recall looking at the chemical shower in particular or at least not rioting anything I and lim- you recall this as well? Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: cociCCIo/chvso) (CDC/ceio/chvso); - Holmes, David Koob, Stephen H. - coo/ocooioscp); Phillips, Roman (CTR) Sent: Fri Feb 13 17:25:34 2009 Subject: Re: First hand account oincident 2-12-2009 Was there any indication of problems with air?ow (overly red or blue) in the scematics of the LCD display of the lab prior to exiting? . - ., (CDC/ocooionsi; (CDC/ocooiosspi; [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 262801} U.S.C. 2523 From: CDCICCIDINCZVED WM To: 9: mg . Ilie?w - (cocxocoinHS); Keep, Stephen H. Phillips, Roman (CTR) Sent: Fri Feb 13 1?:10:31 200 Subject: First hand account ncident 2-12-2009 - I I b}[3}142 U.S.Here IS an account of the ineldent on 2-12-2009 in site .hernical shower. Please let us know if you have any ques ions or i we left anyone off of the "to" line. 2523"? uses ?Record oncident February 12.doc>> (piisiz42 use. 252aihi From: (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 6:00 PM To: Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Williams. Jeffery . Subject: RE: First hand account of ?i ncident 2-12-2009 Many thanks, I appreciate it. U.S.C. 262801} OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. This document is intended for Lin: exclusive use 01"th named show. [1 mo} contain Information that It'- or con?dential. and itshould not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information li?you art.- not the intended rccipienttsi. an} dissemination. distribution. or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this document in error. please notify ihL? Strider and lht? original From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 5:59 PM To: mmociocoorosm - Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery (cocrocooraFoi Subject: Re: First hand account 0 incident 2-12-2009 Thanks - again i am wondering about external monitoring More on Tuesday. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: $53] ESE (cocrocoorosem To: Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Sent: Fri Feb 13 17:56:49 2009 Subject: FW: First hand account of incident 2-12-2009 Another tidbit of information from personnel in the lab at the e-mails below. use. 252arn} OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survev. This document Is inlendcd linr Elli: c?acluSI?it? use i'il?llic :CCIplcnits?l named ulnn'u it min t'iintilm scnoim that is protected. or con?dential, and It should no: be disseminated. distrihulcd. or ?0le to not authorized lo receive such H'giuti art- not the reclpienll's I. any dissemination, distrihulitin, or copying is strut-LI}. prohibited Lhmlit this document in error, pit-ast- until} the scrim-i immediately.- (mtl deatrn} the tli'lglnul. From: (Cociccroinczveo) Se 'uary 13, 2009 5:52 PM Tol?g?l CbCiCCID/chveo); mm cociccroinczveo); coCiccroinczveo) Holmes, David (CDC/ocooronsx Koob, Stephen H. (coo/ocooioseri); cociocooioseri); Philli 5, Roman (CTR) Subject: Re: First hand account of 0?56?; incident 2-12-2009 959mm I recall that while we were working, the chemical shower room was blue and blinking on the LCD. new; . (coCrocoo/oHS); Holmes, David (cocrocooxonsx Koob, Stephen H. (CDC/ocooiaFc); (CbCiocoorosep); Phillips, Roman (cociocooisFo) (CTR) Sent: Fri Feb 13 1?:32:53 2009 Subject: Re: First hand account of incident 2-12-2009 No. prior to our initial attempt to exit, I recall that the LCD monitor showed the suite to be greenlblue. I do not recall looking at the chemical shower in particular or at least not noting anything unusual ibii3iri2U-S-C-s252aih} Ido you recall this as welt? Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: . (cociccro/chvec To: - . Holme avid Koob, Stephen H. (cocioCOO/sFo); (CDC/ocooioseri); Phillips, Roman (CDC/ocooisFO) (CTR) (cociocooioHS); (coo/ocooiossp); Sent: Fri Feb 13 1?:25:34 2009 Subject: Re: First hand account of ncident 2-12-2009 stress - Was there any indication of problems with air?ow (overly red or blue) in the ssematics of the LCD display of the lab prior to exiting? $133142 use. From M42 Ur'ni'c' CZVED To: nag?3:233 ill! (go: CCID I. I a cot/CCIo/iiczvso) - . Hoimes, David cociocooiOHS); Stephen H. (cociocooisFO); . (cociocooiosm); (cociocooiosem; Phillips, Roman - (CTR Sent: Fri Feb 13 17:10:31 2009 Subject: First hand account ofincident 2-12-2009 . . H, I 33;:Here is 3mm 1. gal and )aecount of the moldent on 2-12-2009 lI'l chemical shower. Please let us know if you have any questions or if we left anyone off of the "to" line. USE. BEE Friday, Febru? 13. 2009 6113 PM thlt?l mm a (CDCICOTPERIDSAT) (CTR) porter. William Popovic1 Tanja Nicholson. Janet Edwards, Jacqueline Stevens. John R. Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Monroe. Steve Holmes, David Sanders, Martin L. (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Subject: Building (mig?mmam Issue Good Afternoon The purpose of this e-mail is to provide report to DSAT that individuals in the experienced air?ow and decon shower dif?culties upon exiting the laboratory at approximately 4:05 pm on Februa 12 2009. It is reported that the difficulties experienced did not result in an overall compromise in containment in thmboratow or any potential release of agent from the laboratory. Additional details will be provided upon completion of the investigation by the Of?ce of Health and Safety (OHS) and our Buildings and Facilities Office Respectfully submitted, (straw use. 2522mm OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. This document is intended for the exclusive use ui'tln: Iltllul?i Him?: I: may contain sensitive information that is protected. or con?dential. and it should not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to pcrsons not Hulh?fi??d to receive such in limitation. It'you are not the intended any dissemination. distrihulinn. cnpying is strictly prohibited. If you think you him: received this document in error. please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original ugig?mgw Mir-4 in; From: BEE Sent: Eriday, l:ebrua 13, 2009 PM To: legii?gp? - Subject: Fw: See below A Sent using BlackBerry Original Message From: Porter, William . . . . . . [bl To: Besser, Rich Nlchols, Bill {coercoo Porter, William (couocowosspl; Chandler, George (common/are); Nicholson, Janet [CDC/ceioron); Holmes, David CC: mire} Se .rrl ran 13 15.31.11 woo Subject: Fw: Dr. Besser: Not sure what Martin Sanders coveyed regaring this issue, Jan Nichols, and David Holmes were all involved in determining that this incident did not rise to the level ofa reportable event. There was no workiing stock out and no laboratory activities taking place in the lab at the time ofthe gasket/decon failure! Per regulation all agreed that the event did not constitute a reportable event. I was brief [ate this afternoon by the and agreed. Facilities, the gland David Holmes (OHS) ARE WORKING THE ISSUE AND THE LAB BE USED UNTIL CORRECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN. The BFO and David Holmes will provide more speci?c informatio (as requested early next week. if you need something earlier be let me know. Thanks Bill .. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Messag Fromm (CDC/ocooxossp) To: Holmes, David Porter, William Sent: Fri Feb 13 17:01:47 2009 Subject: David, WW, @hasjust called me to indicate that Martin Sanders has conveyed information of the 3,3355. ab incident to the CDC Acting Director, and that the Director has mandated a written report by COB on Tuesday. is concerned about the precident that will be set if we report this to DSAT since there was no release of SA (by risk assessment) and overall containment of the laboratory was not compromised. Also George Chandler is in my office now seeking additional information about the occurrence. He wants to be sure that you have interviewed the BFO staff (Steve Koob and Ken Bowen) as well. still plan to send a brief e-mail to DSAT alerting them that we had a facility-related issue on exiting the lab with decon shower and airflow function which is currently under investigation. Sent using BlackBerry 33% From: (CDCIOCOOIDSEH Sent: Friday. February 13, 2009 7:27 PM To: Holmes, David (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Subject: Re: Steve Koob has orders to have a written report to George Chandler by midnight tonight. Call me at [bii?i please. Sent using BlackBerry Original Message From: Holmes, David To: ESE cociocoorosse) Cc: Porter, William Chandler, George Sent: Fri Feb 13 19:24:42 2009 Subject: Re: cease I had no idea that Martin had been in discussion with the director's office. I am scheduled to talk with Steve Koob tuesday {he was hard at work trying to figure this all out} and I would certainly like to speak with Ken Bowen as well. I will set this up, do you think we should do this before then? Thank you, David Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld David E. Holmes, Ph. D. Biosafety Team Lead Office of the Chief Operations Officer Office of Health and Safety 1600 Clifton Road, N15 F05 Atlanta, GA 30333 Offi Cell: cuv4@cdc.gov This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipientls} named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protected, privileged, or confidential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. If you are not the intended recipient{s}, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this document in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. Thank you. Original Message From: Porter, William To: Besser, Rich Nichols, Bill (cocxcoGH/oo); Porter, William (coo/ocoojoscp); mama Chandler, George Nicholson, Janet Holmes, David (CDC/ocoorousi CCZI use. 262301} I Sent: Fri Feb 13 18:51:11 2009 Subject: Fw: Dr. Besser: Not sure what Martin Sanders coveved regaring this issue, Jan Nichols, and David Holmes were all involved in determining that this incident did not rise to the ievel of a reportable event. There was no workiing stock out and no laboratory activities taking place in the lab at the time of the gasket/'decon failure! Per regulation all agreed that the event did not constitute a reportable event. I was brief late this afternoon by the E3 and agreed. Facilities, the and David Holmes (OHS) ARE WORKING THE ISSUE AND THE LAB BE USED UNTIL CORRECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN. The BFO and David Holmes will provide more speci?c informatio {as requested early next week. If you need something earlier be let me know. Thanks -- Sent from my BlackBerrv Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Mcocrocoowscp) To: Holmes, David Porter, William Sent: Fri Feb 13 17:01:47 2009 Subject: David, has just called me to indicate that Martin Sanders has conveyed information of the Bid ncident to the CDC Acting Director, and that the Director has mandated a written report by COB on Tuesday. is concerned about the precident that will be set if we report this to DSAT since there was no release of SA {by risk assessment) and overall containment of the laboratorv was not compromised. Also George Chandler is in my office now seeking additional information about the occurrence. He wants to be sure that you have interviewed the BFO staff {Steve Koob and Ken Bowen) as well. i still plan to send a brief e-mail to DSAT alerting them that we had a facility-related issue on exiting the lab with decon shower and airflow function which is currently under investigation. U.S.C. Sent using BlackBerry From: micocrocoolrosem Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 7:36 PM To: Porter, Willi: (CDCIOCODIORFP) Subject: Re: Building (misiz42 use. 252mm Issue Great--thank you! Sent using BlackBerry From: Porter, William (CDCIOCOOJOSEP) To: BEE IKE J. Sent: Fri Feb 13 19:30:44 2009 Subject: Fw: Buildingl lIssue I think we are okaym Sent from my BlaokBerry Wireless Handheld From: Besser, Rich To: Porter, William (CDCIOCOOKOSEP) Sent: Fri Feb 13 19:15:57 2009 Subject: Re: Building ISSUE Thanks. Bill. Richard E. Besser. MD Acting Director, CDC and Acting Administrator, ATSDR From: Porter, William (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) To: Besser, Rich Sent: Fri Feb 13 19:14:45 2009 Subject: Fw: Building M3142 use. 262301} Issue Fyi. Bill Sent from my BlaokElerry Wireless Handheld From: ml To: (CTR) Cc: Porter, William Popovic, Tanja Nicholson, Janet Edwards, Jacqueline Stevens, John R. Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Monroe, Steve Holmes, David Sanders, Martin L. Sent: Fri Feb 13 18:12:56 2009 Subject: Building I (New USE-5262301) lIssue Good Afternoon (more uses 262aih} The purpose of this e-mail is to provide report to DSAT that individuals in the experienced air?ow and decon shower dif?culties upon exiting the laboratory at approximately 4:05 pm on February 12, 2009. It is reported that i the dif?culties experienced did not result in an overall compromise in containment in thlaboratory or any potential release of agent from the laboratory. Additional details will be provided upon completion of the investigation by the Office of Health and Safety (OHS) and our Buildings and Facilities Office (BFO). Respectfully submitted, [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 2E2a[h} OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. Ii his document Is for the c?xclusnc use ol'the named about It may eontain sensith information that 15- protected. pri's'ilcgod. or con?dential, and It should not he disseminated. di?ll?lhut?d. or copied to persons not uutliorixed In recent such inl?nmminn ti'ynu are not the Intended recipienll?l. inn}. dissemination, disinhution. or copying is stiletl'i' prohibited lt?yuu think f-uu IlilH.? received this document in enor. please notify the sender Immediately and destroy. the onginnl From: BEE icocrocooroseei Sent: Saturda Februa 14, 2009 9:1? AM To: mi] Subject: Re: First hand account ofmncidani 242-2009 mil-Please make sure that Bill Porter and I are on your invitation list for the meeting. This has risen to the Director's of?ce level. Many thanks. Sent using BlackBerry From: To: (cociCCIo/chvsoi; (cociocooioHS); Olson, Victoria (cociccm/chvso); Braden, Zachary (coo/coiomczveo CTR Koob, Stephen H. (CDC/accorBFoii Phillips, Roman (CT R) Sent: Sat Feb 14 08:44:11 2009 . Subject: Re: First hand account of ncident 2-12?2009 HOG issue. Can have an emergency meeting. I am not in favor of circumventing. From: To: Olson, Victoria if? (cociccmrilczveo - . Koob, Stephen H. (cociocoO/BFO); (cociocooioscp); (cociocooicJSEP); Phillips, Roman (CTR) Sent: Sat Feb 14 07:54:18 2009 Subject: Re: First hand account of ?(31'142 incident 2-12?2009 QFS it might be a good idea for all of us to get together and discuss next steps forward once Steve has finished his assessment. It's probably better for us to work together to initiate a working plan to solve any outstanding issues, rather than having an independent top down decision. ioii3}:42 use a 252aini From: Holmes, David (cociocooiorisi . . To: (coo/ccioinczveo); - Smith, Scott K. ma Koob, Stephen H. (coo/ocooisFO); Phillips, Roman (CTR) Sent: Sat Feb 14 07:40:00 2009 I Subject: Re: First hand account of incident 2?12-2009 I understood that Steve was working on a report for George detailing the engineering aspects of this incident. Steve is it possible to get a copy once it has been completed? David . Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld David E. Holmes, Ph. D. Biosafety Team Lead Office of the Chief Operations Officer Of?ce of Health and Safety 1600 Clifton Road, MS F05 Atlanta, GA 30333 Of?ce: 404.639.3255 Cell: cuv4@cdc.gov LII This document is intended for the exciusive use of the recipientis) named above. it may contain sensitive information that is protected, privileged, or confidential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed. or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), any dissemination. distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this document in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. Thank you. From: til To: CDC/ccm/chveo}; - . . (coo/cao/chvso) Holmes David (coclocooxmsy Koob, Stephen H. (coo/ocoorsFO); . (coo/ocoolossm; Phillips, Roman (CTR) Sent: Sat Feb 14 06:57:35 2009 mm, Subject: Re: First hand account 0 51,333,? incident 2-12-2009 Read this again this morning. I have a couple of questions - is it possible the main lab was "red" on attempts to reenter the shower post initial non?successful automatic ahower attempts, simply because the "supply" of the showeri'suit roomfmain lab (these are all on one set up?) turned on (Le. This was after 4:15 when the shower reenabled), and the door between the shower and suit lab was open? If the shower was still neutral {not sure when this would have happened with respect to the shower reenabling at 4:15) would the math calculations support a hypothesis that there was enough positive pressure generated by the deluge showers and positive pressure from suits on airlines that this would have blown the door open? {This is what was suggested to me by one engineer). [0}[3}242 U.S.C. 2523(0} (b}[3}i242 USE. 2523 From: To: ma can - Holmes, David Koob, Stephen H. (CDC/ocooleFO); (coo/ocooxossp); (CDC/ocoorosem; Phillips, Roman (CTR) Sent: Fri Feb 13 17:10:31 200 Subject: First hand account of incident 2?12-2009 . l0 .5 24.! Here is our and ?3142 Ui'lisi'c' gma account of the incident on 2-12-2009 in Egg-ht chemical shower. Please let us know if you have any questions or if we left anyone off of the "to" line. use. ?Record oi 262aih} Incident Februaryl 12.doc>> [b}[3}242 USE. 5 252301} '1 From: [5253] (coolocoorosem Sent: Saturda February 14. 2009 11:16 AM . a ., To: Emu. Holmes, David (coolCClolchveoi; Braden. Zacha cocrcmomczveo) (CTR - Him (GoslocoOiosem; Philli sure man (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Subject: Re; First hand account of log; incident 2-12-2009 Thank you all--l'll look forward to receipt of the report to include with my submission to DSAT (but clearly not a El report). Sent using BiackBerry From: some! (cocrcoorriczvso) To: Holmes, David Smith, Scott K. Braden Zacha EEZI (cocrocooroseri); GEE Phillips, Roman (CTR) Sent: Sat Feb 14 11:09:54 2009 Subject: Re: First hand account om incident 2-12-2009 GEL I think we are saying the same thing. Look forward to the meeting on Tuesday. I look forward to particiatiion in ?nalizing the asessment report. fb}[3}242 U.S.C. 2623 fh} [b}(3}242 U.S.C. 2623(h} From: To: lit - - Holmes, David Roman (CTR) Sent: Sat Feb 14 10:53:17 2009 mum Sub'ect: RE: First hand account of 35523?? incident 2?12-2009 jm. Braden Zacha 52 (coo/ocoo/ossp); Phillips, The HOG and members have discussed many related issues that have let to solutions. it is just that incidents in WW itend to have adverse effects at many levels. I do not believe that a large meeting will be conclusive to figuring anything out and more likely will be confusing to those unfamiliar with how the facility operates. Things will be figured out by monitoring. testing, user observation. and examining systems (8A8) for deficiencies. We are striving for perfection. but we won't reach it. EEI From: $3 Sent: Saturda . February 14. 2009 10:2? AM To: ma KEEN Holmes, David Iii?! Braden, Zacha CDCICCIDINCZVED) Mg [.523 (coo/CCIo/chvso}; (cocrocooroHsi; Phillips, Roman (CTR) Engage Subject: Re: First hand account of 262aih?i incident 2-12-2009 uses 1 think this is a valid issue for the HoG.and precisely why we all feit the group should be chartered. Do you feel the HOG has been suf?ciently engaged? From what I have seen so far. I am not sure it has been. but perhaps there are man asects of this situation thatl have not been privy to. if that is the case. however. that concerns me as well. as Iii-5% and I are the for this scienti?c SA group. I do not view this as a meeting. but as a forum to communicate what happened. ?gure out the various points of failure, and assess approaches to correct them. USE. 2623[h} . .1 . . To: [mati??'fyc'w?za Holmes, David Smith, co . mg IEZI Roman (CTR) Sent: Sat Feb 14 10:15:26 2009 Subject: RE: First hand account ofincident 2-12-2009 Ok. from my perspective this Tuesday meetirn is netting out of control. I had hoped that this incident could be managed simply and quickly without escalating it into a Egg-h? summit meeting, but requests for irvitees to the Tuesday meeting is pushing things beyond the role of the HOG. :ie aware that the way we response to thi (?353555.35 incident will set a precedent for upcoming future events [my experience allows me to guarantee you that they will take place periodicallyl). i understand the seriousness of what happened and the need to fix the problems (and they will be). but I also see the danger in making it a bigger deal than it really needs to be. I am not sure how much the response is driven by cool- headed professionalism and how much is driven by insecurity. express the desire not to have a top down decision. but that is where eaded. If a large meeting with high-level representation is desired. then I think it needs to be bumped up to th Governance Council. as it is better positioned with regards to policy decisions (such as how responses to future incidents should be orchestrated). Be careful what you wish for. My 2 cents. From: (coo/ocooiossp) Sent: Saturda February 14. 2009 9:31 AM To: "(cociccmincz?iimm mm Braden. Zachary (CDCICCIDINCZVED) @323 ram Phillips, . . cociCCIoincszo); Holmes. David . I Phillips, Roman (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: First hand account 0 incident 2-12-2009 My thought is that this should be a bigger matting and include others in BFO such as George Chandler. Jeffery Williams and Ken Bowen as well since this matter has risen to the level of the Director's of?ce and personnel at higher levels are trying to de?ne what actually occurred and the appropriate corrective action to senior mgmt. Sent using BlackBeny From: . . T0: [3:323 (CDC/CCIoincszo); Holmes, David icocxocooioHsi; Smith, Scott K. Braden Zachary (CTR - - mambo/commence); mrcociocooionsx Phillis Roman (coo/ocooisroi (CTR) . 'Sent: Sat Feb 14 09:25:44 2009 Subject: Re: First hand account of incident 242-2009 Is this a meeting Scott, Zach. and myself should attend even though we are not technically members of the I feel it wouid be best since we are really the only ones who can give the account from what happened inside the laboratory and if there are specific questions we could hopefully answer them. Just my two cents! Sent from my BIackBerry Wireless Handheld ibii3}242 usc. 262a To: will?! Holmes, David Smith, Scott K. Braden, Zachary can ?than, User-1,4254 GEE BEE (cocioc00/0HS); Koob, Stephen H. (cociocooisFO); ?gangsta, (cocrocoo/OSEP); Phillips, Roman (CTR) Sent: Sat Feb 14 09:09:24 2009 Subject: Re: First hand account 0 incident 2-12?2009 concur-George Chandler expressed that he was learning new details by talking to different individuals that are critical in defining the overall sequence of events and potential causative factors. A meeting in raining classroom on Tuesday would be appropriate if available. Sent using BlackBerry I b. To: Holmes, David lime, . 53?. us?i?"?s??ss Braden, Zachary Koob, Stephen H. (coo/0000mm), (cociocoorOSEP); Phillips, Roman (cociocooisPO) (CTR) Sent: Sat Feb 14 02:54:18 2009 is, Subject: Re: Firsthand account of -- I incident 2-12-2009 It might be a good idea for all of us to get together and discuss next steps forward once has finished his assessment. It's probably better for us to work together to initiate a working plan to solve any outstanding issues. rather than having an independent top down decision. Int?g I [bii3}:42 202aih} I [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 262mb} From: Holmes, David (CDCIOCOOJOHS) . I I To: coo/coloniczvso); Braden, Zachary mg - (coo/CCIoichvso); Koob, Stephen H. (cociocooisro); Phillips, Roman (CDC/ocoorsro) (CTR) Sent: Sat Feb 14 07:40:00 2009 Subject: Re: First hand account of incident 2-12-2009 I understood that Steve was working on a report for George detailing the engineering aspects of this incident. Steve is it possible to get a copy once it has been completed? Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld David E. Holmes, Ph. D. Biosafety Team Lead Of?ce of the Chief Operations Officer Office of Health and Safety 1600 Clifton Road, MS F05 Atlanta, GA 30333 Offi . Cell: . cuv4@cdc.gov This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipientts) named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protected, privileged, or con?dential. and it should not be disseminated. distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. If you are not the intended recipient(s). any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this document in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. Thank you. From: To: 'ni' a Smith Scott K. Braden, Zacha BEE ma (coo/ccromczveo); (cocrocooronsi; Holmes, David (coclocooroHS); Koob, Staphen H. (cocrocoolsrm; (coclocoomssp); (CDC/ocooiosspl; Phillips, Roman {cocrocoolsrol (CTR) Sent: Sat Feb 14 06:5?z35 2009 Subject: Re: First hand account of incident 2-12H2009 Read this again this morning. I have a couple of questions - is it possible the main lab was "red" on attempts to reenter the shower post initial non-successful automatic ahower attempts, simply because the "supply" of the showerfsuit rooml'main lab (these are all on one supplyi'exhaust set up?) turned on (Le. This was after 4:15 when the shower reenabled), and the door between the shower and suit lab was open? If the shower was still neutral {not sum when this would have happened with respect to the shower reenabling at 4: 15] would the math calculations support a hypothesis that there was enough positive pressure generated by the deluge showers and positive pressure from suits on airlines that this would have blown the door open? (This is what was suggested to me by one engineer). USE. 252801} From: To; Smith, Scott K. Braden, Zachary Wit-W I ?pic 2523 (coerccro/chvso); my Elia, Wit? wwrcoclOCOO/OHS); Holmes David Koob, Stephen H. I (coclocooroseri); Phillips, Roman (coo/ocoorsFO) (CTR) Sent: Fri Feb 13 17:10:31 2009 Subject: First hand account of incident 2-12-2009 Here is our (1 WW U-S-C- 5 Zaiamlibiwi I) account of the incident on 2422009 in Cm chemical shower. Please let us know if you have any questions or if we left anyone off of the "to" line. 4 a- -1 ?:picre the reversal of airflow in the Vivarium (to positive) would be it would improve safety and make working in the facility simpler and less laborious. Of course, such a project is FMEO's responsibility to evaluate and hopefuin implement. If there is anything that the HOG can do to facilitate this process. please let us know and we will assist in any way we can. Thanks for our consideration. i IT l3'242 5C. 262ml]: [oils-t4! LLS L1 as? i i (coo/ocoorosuel From: Williams, Jelani Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 3:33 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Koob, Stephen H. Nooromid, Shahab Cc: Ra mend, George (CDCIOC I -- eira, William P. (cocl'OGOOJOSl?lel; Howard, William (Bill Whatley, Marcus E. West, Johnnie C. mm 3 (CDC Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIEFD) (CTR) ?agging-2 . .. . Shutdown JHA 232341: .. . - Ken 8: Steve, Attached is the revised JHA. Pease review for accepta rice. Also, please provide the FMEO and/or FSE contacts for who will be responsible to shut down the 843 and turn off power at the panels Thursday morning. Thanks -Jelani From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDC/ocooreFol Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 12:44 PM To: Koob, Stephen H. Nooromid, Shahab Cc: Raymond, George Nogueira, William P. Williams, Jelani (CDC/calo/uczveol; Howard, William (Bill) icocrocoozousl; IMF-42 1li'glhatley, Marcus E. West, Johnnie C. Phillips, Roman (CTR) 262a'm: Sofafect; -- Shutdown JHA Shahab, Can you add these item to the JHA and resend it? Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404?539-3303 Of?ce 4134?6390499 Fax sPlease visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. >This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. ??-?Drigina From: Kooh, Stephen H. Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 12:27 PM To: Nooromid, Shahab Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Raymond, George Nogueira, William P. Williams, Jelani Howard, William (Bill) Whatley, Marcus E. West, Johnnie C. Phillips, Roman Shutdown JHA recommend before Item 5 that the air systems on the associated floors be shut down by the BAS system prior to killing the power. We should also have a step 15 that the systems be brought back up by the BAS system. This will keep the variable speed drives and the controls from unnecessary power interuption issues. [fyou let the power kill it and restart it we may have trouble with the VFD's especially when we come back. Give us the extra steps Thanks From: Nooromid, Shahab Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:11 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Raymond, George Nogueira, William P. Williams, .lelani [cocxocoo/oi-isi; Kersh, Gilbert Howard, William {am} icocxocoorousi; Koob, Stephen H. Whatley, Marcus E. West, Johnnie C. ?Eddie-ct: RE: Shutdown JHA EBEaih. Ken, Please sign off on the attached JHA, we are prepared to do the shutdown on Thursday 3,!26 at 4:00am. Thanks Shahab From: Williams, Jeiani Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 2:03 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIDCODIBFOJ Cc: Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Nogueira, William P. 1:55;;th Sh?j'eqt: Shutdown JHA Importance: High Ken, Please review attached JHA. It is the same as last week that you previously signed, but with the dateftime changed to Thursday 325 from 4:00am - 7:00am. Let me know when you are in your office and i will bring it by for signature. Or if you would like to acknowledge the date/time change and approve by a response to this e-mail, that may suffice. The old I JHA is the attached PDF ?le. Thanks, -Jelani 2 I. . (C DCKO GOOIO SH E) From: Nooromid, Shahab Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:11 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOO BFO Noueira. William P. (CDC 0800 BFO ;Williams, Jelani gg'gsu-S-Ir? Howard, William (Bill) Koob, Stephen H. Whatley, Marcus E. West, Johnnie C. I. . . Shutdown JHA .. 200903171 51 ?23806.pdf Ken, Please sign offon the attached JHA, we are prepared to do the shutdown on Thursday 3/26 at 4:00am. Thank; Shahab From: Williams, Jelani Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 2:03 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. .George Nooromid, Shahab Nogueira. William P- 26231117Subject-squ- Shutdown JHA Importance: High Ken, Please review attached JHA. It is the same as last week that you previoust signed, but with the datez?time changed to Thursday 3f26 from 4:00am -7:00am. Let me know when you are in your of?ce and I will bring it by for signature. Or if you would like to acknowledge the dateftirne change and approve by a response to this e-mail, that may suf?ce. The old JHA is the attached PDF file. Thanks -Je ani Inuit-?ll! 202alh'- .. Attachments: All, Fwi Williams, Jelani (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Monday. March 23, 2009 10:01 AM .?loorornid, Shahab Nogueira. William P. (CDCIUCOO (0000000203140; (oocrotorrtGEZID . Massung. Robert ma: Baughrnan, Steven Fair. Reuben Whatley. Marcus E. West, Johnnie C. (CDC 0000 Parsons, Orisha Fliley, Steve HA HU Door - Weekly schedule Weekly Schedule3.23.pdf 0.5 Please see attached for weekly schedule. Thanks. -Jelani From: Don McKinney To: Necromid, Shahab (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Victor Stewart Sent: Wed Apr 22 14:05:40 2009 Subject: RE: Temporary Wall i ?2?2alli.l Does the wall presently serve any real purpose? If not, then it should be removed, if only to improve access for programs readying to use the Vivarium. From: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:49 PM To: Nooromid, Shahab Fair, Reuben (cocrocooraFo) Cc: Raymond, George (coo/ocooratol; Haney, Michael (cocrocooxatol; (CDC/ocoo/oilsi; 'eiz-J'i - Whatley, Marcus E. West, Johnnie C. Baughman, Steven I 03135-242 US i3. Subject: RE: Temporary Wal ?2E2allu ?Nogueira, William P. 'Don lvicKinney'; "v?ictor Stewart' Okay then it is screwed up and you flit it. its amazing how you know that the wall is not the problem. Are you an engineer? Fix it. it will not pass commissioning Message-?? From: Nooromid, Shahah (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:33 PM To: Koob, Stephen H. Fair, Reuben (CDCIDCDOJBFO) Cc: Raymond, George [coo/ocool'aFol; Haney, Michael (CDC/ocoo/arol; . (coorCCIo/chvsol; Whatley, Marcus E. (cocrocoorero); West, Johnnie c. (cocrocoo/srol; Baughman, Steven Nogueira, William P. Nooromid, Shahab 'Don McKinneyT; 'Victor Stewart' I 42 Subject: RE: Temporary Wal The temporary wall has no effect on pressure in the lab area. The wall is open on top so pressure on both sides should be equal. Testing must continue regardless of temporary wall status. The wall will be removed after door painting is complete. Thank; Shahab Message-?-- From: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:13 PM To: Noorornid, Shahab Fair, Reuben Cc: Raymond, George Haney, Michael .. Subject: Temporary Wall I3 ?262a Guys When does the contractor intend to remove the temporary door from the general lab. I think it is causing issues with providing a negative room and it should be removed prior to us doing any further testing trailer-aria,, (cocrocoorosn E) From: Ayers, Jessica Sent: Monda was: 21 201211131 AM To: Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Branch, Ivan (CTR): Ford, Maria Cristina (cocromrncezioi; Powell, Nathaniel [cocromincezrot Prohst, Paul E. (CDC Howard. William {Bill} (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: FIE: Thanks all, I observed the air?ow post-adjustment and when thel: d'oo'r'was open-ed and allowed to close the outward ?utter of the tape Was greatly lessened. 'We really appreciate your fast woth on this.l From: Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 10:13 AM I . To: Ayers, Jessica Sheppard, Jeffe D. Jeff) Branch, Ivan Ford, Maria Cristina Powell, Nathaniel Prohst, Paul E. Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIUSHE) Subject: RE: li-E?id?g?g Airflow deflectors on the supply registers were adjusted this morning and turn more outward and away from the door. Thanks [El From: Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:40 AM To: Ayers, Jessica Sheppard Jeffen Ford, Maria Cristina I Paul E. (cot/ocooieFO) . ?3 242 Subject: Re: Hie I -.1 Thanks all. Ibii3' 42 Can we get Keith or Kerry upstairs and and ensure that the measurements are where they should he. Thanks From: Ayers, Jessica CEZID) Sent: Frida Ma 18, 2012 11:26 AM To: more (cociocoorosnrj; Sheppard, Jeffery 0. (Je cociocoorosnt); Branch, Iyan (cociocooisro) Ford, Marla Cristina (cociocoorsFO); (escrow/scene); Powell, Nathaniel [bj[3}242 Subject: RE: 262arh: Okay, I?ve been in! I concur witthoughrs on previous looks at this door-the inward air?ow does not appear to he as Strong as the other doors in the central corridor, however, it is always inward. When the door is opened hilly and allowed to shut-the speed looks appropriate to me, so I don?t-think the door needs to be adjusted-ho-a?eyer, the lower airflow does- ailow the tape to ?utter outward into the central corridor more noticeath than other doors as it is closing?l believe this is whatwas seeing that he brought to your attention. Once the door closes, the tape goes inward again. 'In my opinion (based on my training Offer the past few years} it is expected and accepted that there will he a slight mixing of or turbulent 1 air around a moving door as it opens/ shuts and that. there should he no concerns with this under normal circumstances. I would love to see the inward air?ow at this door be stronger, but Jeff's info on the register being located above tins room makes me see why this might not be possible here and makes sense to me. Unless you guys have a solution for the register above this door. I don?t think this is an issue that needs to be pursued any further. I have talked to Peter and will talk with him again to be sure he understands the dynamics and that I address any concerns he may have. IFanyone does feel like we should get together Monday to Study this door again, i would be happy to do so! Cheers! ]essica To: Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Branch Ivan CDCIOCOOIBFO) Ford, Maria Cristina Ayers, Jessica i Powell, Nathaniel (CDCJOIDINCEZID Subject: Re: Thanks Jeff that is what I thought. As I mentioned yesterday we have seen' that in other labs where the register is directly above a tell tail/door and it can move fonny yet when you test the flow it remains very negative. Jessica is going in later. You guys are on site and make the call. Based on your observation if she sees the same then we can Iook at it again on Monday. 1 . From: Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Sent: Frida Ma 18, 2012 09:59 AM To: (CDCIOCOOIDSHE Branch Ivan Ford, Maria Cristina AyersJ (cocrotomcezto) I IE. .o Subject: All, itli3ii42 Peter Eronosky is out today along with this fact, no staff could be found to allow access to the.? ibifj'l?; mg However, the fluctuation in the tail tale seemed to be a result of the supply register located directly above the "l tale. The tail tale was observed from the clean corridor window on the west side of the vivarium. The tail tale located on B- was seen moving with indicating a negative to neutral airflow. The tail tale NEVER indicated a positive airflow. Can this issue be tabled until Monday? please let me know. Thanks. Occupational Health and Safety Manager Office of Safety, Health and Environment (formally OHS) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 404-718-2037 Jeffery Sheppard isQ cdc. ov Please visit OHS Customer Satisfaction Survey; and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey. qji? From: Ayers, Jessica (CDCIOIDXNCEZID) Sent: Frida Ma 18 2012 9:46 AM To: (cocrocoorOSHEl; (Coerciolncezm): Sheppard. Jeffery o. idem Prohst. Paul E. (cocrocooreFO); Powell. Steven L. (cocrocoOleFm Cc: Ewo onskv. Peer J. Powell, Nathaniel Subiect: FIE: 3'1 centrai corridor door update H1 3.1L Sorry I was our and not involved in this issue. I need to go in to look at animals in area this morning Amway. so I will check out: this door and get back to you. I am sorry Peter and I missed the 93m meeting request-he left: early and I didn't have work email access so neither of us saw it! Stand by! Jcssica From: Eworonsky, Peter J. (CDCIOIDKNCEZID) Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 9:41 AM .To: Ayers, Jesfmwus? Subject: FW: central corridor door update FYI Thanks, Peter From: Branch, Ivan (CTR) Sent: Thursda Ma 17, 2012 3:10 PM To: (cocrocoorosael Ce: Eworonsky, Peter 3. cocroromcezm); Sheppard, Jeffery o. (Jeff) (cocrocooroSHE); LaQuentin Jenkins Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoorsron Ford Maria Cristina {cocrocoorsrox Powell, Steven L. (cocrocoorero) Subject: RE: 3355:5359 central corridor door update According to he door is still closing correctly. We all need to meet outside '3 in the morning at 9:00 in an attempt to bring closure to this door closure issue. From: I: E'E'gf?g'zagal (cocrocoorOSHE) Sent: Thursday, May 2012 12:40 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Powell, Steven L. Branch, Ivan (CTR) Cc: Howard, ll? illiam (Bill (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) [trill 312 U3 Subject: FW: s252allr cemral corridor door update I think we need to look into replacing some of these door closures. They should not need this amount of adjustmentsfattention. El From: Evvoronskv, Peter J. Sent: Thursday, May 2012 12:20 PM To: Branch Ivan (CTR) Cc: Harris, Desiree Subject: RE: U5 0- ntral corridor door update 252mm lactuallv meant to say that this door is ONLY going positive when it is closing, not all of the time. Thanks, Peter From: Eworonskv, Peter J. Sent: Thursday, May 2012 12:09 PM To: Branch Ivan (CTR) - Hi Ivan, mus' 42 The door that adjusted in the vivarium central corridor room use :3 252a appears to now be going positive. We will Ih" need to have someone down here to adjust It to close slower. - Thanks, Peter a I From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 11:12 AM To: gasaam} Cc: (coprocoorows); - . (coerciorNCEZIo); Howard, William {Bill} Subject: RE: DSAT Request a Viva Dec 11 'vrivarium Del: 11 {prism us a .pdf 262mm Attached air airflow calibration data sheets for testing conducted December 2011. Thanks, Paul Probst Sent: Wednes 02, 2012 3:20 AM To: (coo/accorosHE); (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Bowen, Ken L. Paul E. Zambuto Laura R. Singletary Meadows, Kristi stain . Smith, Scott K. Carroll, Darin Martin, Diane LCD I Subject: DSAT Request . I ib_ll3l.42 USE. In addition to the interviews regarding the airflow incident in the Bid E25230- Vivarium, DSAT has also requested the following. Please provide decontamination information as soon as possible. - smoke testing of doors in the Vivarium; scheduled for approximately 10:00 am. on Thursday, May 3, 2012?? Please be available to assist ARB with this process and to assist with escorting around the clean corridor. It is my understanding per DSAT that they propose to stand outside of the containment space in the clean corridor with smoke sticks and verify the direction of air?ow while the inner door inside the containment space is opened and closed in the same manner that caused the anomaly observed by the visitors. DSAT is not requesting that any failure scenario testing, any HVAC system manipulations or any other mechanical procedures be performed during these tests. Representatives from registered spaces will also be present for the walk-through as well as representatives from the of?ce. mm the date when "this lab? was or the entire 252m?; Vivarium) was last tested for proper airflow 0 any documentation of the test mentioned in bullet is 2 (Paul Probst is providing the last shut-down airflow veri?cation information.) i the date when the lab was decontaminated prior to the reported airflow deviation 0 any documentation regarding the decontamination procedures and veri?cation of these processes Thank you in advance for your assistance with these requests. 5 252mm SC. 5 262mb;- .. Sent: 02. 2012 9:08 AM To: mom me (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Ce: Howard, William (Bill) Probst. Paul E. Subject: RE: DSAT Flequest Thank you, I'll pass this along. US 0 From: I. ?n?ld??g?l (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Wednesda 02, 2012 9:03 AM To} ll C'?i Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: DSAT Request 2523Il'lj- Here is the Vivarium survey sheet from January. Airflow was visually checked via tell tales. File: Vivarium JAN2012.pdf Lab was deoonned on December 5, 2011 by OSHE personnel. Protocol for Spor-Klenz decons is attached. a: File: LABORATORY SURFACE DECONTAMINATION OF WITH so El Still? ?brin: Sent: Wednesda 02, 2012 8:20 AM To: Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Zambuto, Laura R. Singletary Meadows, Kristi Damon, Inger K. Weathers, Michael Martin, Diane Smith, Scott K. (CD Subject: DSAT Request rroli, Darin In addition to the interviews regarding the airflow incident in the Vivarium, DSAT has also requested the following. Please provide decontamination information as soon as possible. a smoke testing of doors in the Vivarium; scheduled for approximately 10:00 em. on Thursday:I May 3, Please be available to assist ARB with this process and to assist with escorting around the clean corridor. It is my understanding per DSAT that they propose to stand outside of the containment space in the clean corridor with smoke sticks and verify the direction ofair?ow while the inner door inside the containment space is opened and closed in the same manner that caused the anomaly observed by the visitors. DSAT is not requesting that any failure scenario testing, any HVAC system manipulations or any other mechanical procedures be performed during these tests. Representatives from registered spaces will also be present for the walk-through as well as representatives from the this; of?ce. - the date when ?this lab" or the entire Vivarium) was last tested for proper airflow - any documentation of the test mentioned in buu?'fiiz [Paul Probst is providing the last shut-down airflow veri?cation information.) I- the date when the lab was decontaminated prior to the reported airflow deviation 9 any documentation regarding the decontamination procedures and verification of these processes Thank you in advance for your assistance with these requests. 42 US '3 r- (coprocoomsaE) Jenkins, Leeoresia T. (CDGIOIDINCEZID) Monday, April 30, 2012 10:10 AM Slough, Lester E. Eworonsky, Peter J. Amino, Abola Cc: mm Ayers, Jessica {cooloio CEZID - Powell, Nathaniel Branch. wan Subject: Doors in the Importance: High Hello Everyone, The doors Today, Four Seasons made some adjustments to the doors in the animal rooms located on between the animal holding rooms and the main labs are supposed to close "slower" than normal. Per if these doors begin to "slam" or close faster than what they have been adjusted to please report it ASAP. Thanks, Leecresia Powell, Nathaniel Wednesda Aril 25, 2012 3:27 PM Probst. Paul e. (We BFO - Powell, Steven L. Ayers, Jessica [scorelomcezmig Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIDCOOIOSH Cc: Black, Carolyn Ayers, Jessica Jenkins. Leecresia T. Eworonsky, Peter J. Subject: RE: liflvarium Thanks for the information. i will be available to participate in the walk through. Ms. Jenkins and Mr. Eworonskv will be available to enter the suite. Thanks EB From: Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 2:39 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOO BFO Powell Steven L. Powell, Nathaniel Ayers, Jessica (CDCIOIDINCEZID): (cocxomiilcezto); Howard, William (Bill) Subject: DSHE would like to do a walk-through of the vivarium on Monday, April 30?? at 8:30 am. The purpose of this walk-through is to re-verify that the animal room doors are continuing to close properly. We will need someone from with access to enter all the labs while OSHE observes. We would also like appropriate FSE personnel to be present so that immediate on site adjustments of the doors can be made if necessary. Thanks L1 Lbi-Idi-242 Ci 3 2523Ihi- (cocrocoomsa E) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent Thursda Aril 19. 2012 1:Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Howard. William (Bill) Subject: Vivarium Door Pressure Differential r" 252th Pressure differential of the spaces within our Vivarium are not monitored via the Building Automation System. The request to provide trending data of pressure differentials at these spaces is therefore not possible to accommodate. Pressure relationship between rooms is visibly indicated via tell-tale tape. Paul Probst. PE Asst. Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Buildings and Facilities Office Office: 404-639-0505 I From; ib]L3]:42 use. a 2?2a[h} Sent: Tuesda Aril 1? 2012 3:46 PM To: Powell. Nathaniel Barrett, Timoth t. Cc: (coorocooiosae Subiect: Fle: clarification on what happened In the Vivarium 2ft 4 2f1Ei We need to confirm with on the trainer role he may have had for the tour on 2,314. The interview process can he used to gain this clarification. me- me! 252aih From: at . (cocrommcezro) Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 03:16 PM To: Powell, Nathaniel Barrett Timoth J. (CDCIODIOADS) (cocrocoorOSHE) Subject: clari?cation on what happened in the Vivarium 2/14 8t 2116 Nate 8t Tim, lhavejust had an epiphany regarding what happened in the Vivarium I was underthe impression that only one date, 2l15f2012, was when entry into the space took place (in Inow realize that it was actually 2114;2012 that a set ofvisitors entered into the .. a (in The others at al. on 2115) did not, and that is why they were on the outside witnessing ,open and close the door now makes sense. However one roblem see is that there does not ai i ear to have been an ARB trainer with the ?rst [Bl-i3142 . . -. EDHB 42 group on took There was 'bi'g? . lam sorry that I overlooked this but was focused on the 2/16 date. 2?2alh' [oji'EizelZ Ll E. CE after speaking. with and researching the log sheets afterwards. - is also interested in getting any documentation from Peter andfor others in ARB indicating that the "clean" prairie dogs were moved into go alon with the program?s recollection and sign in sheets indicating that the convalescent animals have been . 262auh'; o.used..o.n.l.y..m . . Again, very sorry for my oversight. it! 42 From: Sent: Tueeda Aril 1? 2012 3:32 PM To: Mia (coerciorwoezm); Powell, Nathaniel (coercio/NGEZIDJ; Barrett, I DIOADS) cc: U5 0 2E2all'l,? Subject: Re: clarification on what happened in the Vivarium 2114 3: 2(16 3:242 That is correct which is why Lacs is asking DSAT how many events are they referencing. With that said we certainly have issues with the BUT the fact remains they did not enter a SA registered space. rhir3fr42 us c. a 252mm Beth groups entered "clean" non-SA registered spaces according to the sign in sheet . . - - (cocromrucezm) Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 03:16 PM mm - . haniel Barrett 'I'lmoth J. gig-m; Subject: clari?cation on what happened in the Vivarium 2/ 14 3: 2f 16 Nate 8: Tim, i have just had an epiphany regarding what happened in the Vivarium. was under the impression that only one date, 2f16f2012, was when entry into the space took place (in now realize that it was actually 2114/2012 that a set ofvisitors entered into thearea (in The others I at al. on 2/16} did not, and that is why they were on the outside witnessing Peter open and close the door i (and the puff of air). This now makes sense. However, one problem see is that there does not appear to have been an ARB trainer with the first 9D .- took them in! There was . I am sorry that I overlooked this but was focused on the date. I. 262mm gill}? after speaking- w-i-t-h- and researching the log sheets afterwards. is also interested in etting any documentation from ?3 and/or others in ARE indicating that the "clean" prairie dogs were moved into ?Iii ?(to go alorg with the program?s recollection and sign in sheets indicating that the convalescent animals have been teen . . . 2:52am:2 housedonlvm Eula Again, very sorry for my oversight. 2 El 2?2aih. 3 252341"- E) From: (oocrocoor08HE) marliz?glgg: . . I I 2012212 PM 2623'?: .. .. .. . .. Subject: RE: Vivarium door adjustments 2e2arh: Yes, Message-m- agi-:3 Peale": (CD 0 LSILS P0) seer: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 2:0? PM To: Cc: Howard, William {Bill} Subject: RE: Vivarium door adjustments To clarify, you mean below, correct? USE 2623011 From: Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 2:04 PM Eng-gig? Cc: Howard, William {Bill} Subject: FW: Vivarium door adjustments [bll3l'42 [oi Here Isemarl regarding the doors. 0.8 The vivarium was deconned on ?2a2am: prairie dogs were moved intc 2523,?, on 2/15f2012. No active mil?? 2523? work had occurred in since the decon and into March of 2012. Thanks From: Sheppard, Jeffery 0. {Jeff} Sent: Fridav, February 24, 2012 10:4? AM To: (cocrocoofosasl; Branch, Ivan (cociocooiaFol ?1 Williams, Allison Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: lillilrariun'i door adjustments All, Doors have been adjusted to ensure that the airflow remains negative. Each doors in the central corridor has been adjusted by Ivan Branch with the assistance of Peter Eronosky. Respectfully, Jeff Sheppard Jeffery Sheppard Biosafety Manager, Of?ce of Safety Health and Environment, Centers for Disease Control, 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, Ga. 30333 404-718?203? I minis; From: (CoCiCui Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 1:46 PM To: It?leechan Paul J. (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: (codiocooiOSHE); Branch, Ivan Powell, Steven L. Subject: FW: air flow Paul, Below is the Email I sent to regarding the initial inspection of the Vivarium after is was discovered that at least one outer corridor door ofthe Vivarium was exhibiting an air flow issue. As indicated at the end of the Email, the following day adjustments were performed on the doors (by Ivan Branch, FSE Supervisor; Steve Powell, 'b""33*349 - Manager, was also involved in this troubleshooting) resolved the push?back effect and tell tails showed no change in direction of air flow. Ivan and Steve, - . Please feel free to provide your recollections on the above. . From: Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 2:55 PM To: me: (CDC/ocooiosaei Cc: Branch, Ivan (CT Probst, Paul E. Powell, Steven L. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Subject: RE: air ?ow ih?3142 looked at the areas I could get into an - tested the doors for me in use. was on [bd3;42 gag} (Rabies) Door leading from anteroom to procedure is kicking out air hard into the corridor and needs to be slowed down. Door separating procedure from animal holding pushes back and could stand to be slowed down a bit. iIJii'Sjr4 use - . . . . . . . assamunassigned} Door leading from anteroom to procedure is kicking out air into the corridor and needs to be slowed down. Door separating procedure from animal holding pushes back fairly hard and needs to be slowed down. Don?t know about the areas. We can deal with the adjustments tomorrow. I '3 From: (CDC/ocooxoSi-iE) Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 2:00 PM To: '1 . Subject: Fw: air flow Can you look at From: (CDC/ocoozoSHE) Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 01:54 PM To: Powell, Donald Probst, Paul E. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Subject: Fw: air flow Let's get down there an look at them again. are you here tomorrow to assist? El From: Williams, Allison NCEID) Sent: Thursda February.? 23, 2012 01:32 PM To: (co-clocooxoma Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: RE: air flow Yes, I do believe that is correct. However, the door adjustment did not eliminate the reversal of air from inside the procedurel'animal room area into the clean corridor. (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:30 PM To: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel was Subject: Re: air ?ow I was informed all the doors were adjusted From: l?llcociommcezxo) Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 01:15 PM To: (cocxocoolosea Cc: Powell, Nathaniel .aa Subject: air flow IE what's the next step to address the continued airflow issues in buildin . are still being reported as having reversal issues. Please advise. Thanks, ?f?son Will'me 1600 Clifton Road, MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 252mm :12 2528m- Lil: Lag 252mm (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) r831; .. Sent: Monday. February 27. 2012 11:48 AM To: Williams. Allison Powell, Nathaniel we - . tea.- Kenneth D. [are (Cbcromrnoezro- Barrett Timothy J. Howard, William {Bill} (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: Airflow Dr. Powell/Dr. Williams, [belt-42 U. Thank you again for calling the meeting this morning to further discuss the airflow issues observed in the Vivarium over the past week. I?ll be happy to forward the requested information from OSHE as soon as I receive it regarding safety associated with the recent airflow issues noted. Design for the Building Vivarium is such that the overall directional airflow should be sustained from areas with cleanest air to areas with greater potential for contaminated air. Please note that due to our regulatorv reporting requirements, we would prefer that you contact us any time you note a situation that may be a reportable event. In this way, we can engage OSHE and BFO to assist us in conducting a risk assessment and submit a report to DSAT should it be necessary to do so. Thank you too for ensuring that we were alerted to the airflow concerns noted last week. Kindest regards, li'jjf3'i'242 LI 5 a 252mm 5? From: Sheppard, Jeffery,f D. (Jeff) (CDCJOCOOIOSHE) Sent: =riday, Februa 24, 2012 10:4? AM To: ,9 Branch, lvan (coolocooieso) (CTR): E33323, I Williams, Allison Cc: Powell, \lathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Subject: Vivarium door adjustments All, Doors have been adjusted to ensure that the airflow remains negative. Each doors in the central corridor has been adjusted by Ivan Branch with the assistance of Peter Eronosky. Respectfully, Jeff Sheppard Jeffery Sheppard Biosafety Manager, Office of Safety Health and Environment, Centers for Disease Control, 1600 Clifton Rd. NE., Atlanta, Ga. 30333 4045?18-203?? L- 5 202th~ (CDCJOCOOJUSHE) From: Probat, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFCD Sent: Frida Feprua 24,2012 8:48 AM To: . (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: FIE: Select Agent question Appreciate the update. Will let you know what we find out. Based on what we saw the other day, I am -in agreement with you that we have no issues more serious than the ?door closing hard creating milli-seoond poof' problem. Thanks, Paul Probst From: (cocrocoorosas) Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 8:33 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Fw: Select Agent question . I. .. - (cocrocoorosaa Sent: Frida February 24, 2012 08:20 AM tiltitflt?miml Icocromrucszro) Cc: Williams, Allison Powell, Nathaniel Howard, William (Bill) (gpcrocooromE); crOID/Ncazm); Martin, Diane guilt: gig-alt?tootxosesrts-Pppot; 9 Subject: Re: Select Agent question With regards to the doors we are seeing a "poof" when the animaI room doors close hard. This "poof" is an instantaneous happening. i do not View this as a "reversal" but it does need to be resolved and should not be occurring, 1 was told this was taken care of yesterday but apparently not. FSE will again been down this morning for more adjustments. if the doors adjustments don't fix it we have alternatives. Now, ifthere are other issues, l/we need to be made aware of them. To date all I have been told about is what we are referring to as the door issue. If there are other issues, Paul and .leffwill be down this morning. I 0 egg-,1? teem; Se Friday, February 24, 2012 08:00 AM To me: (CDCXOIDINCEZID): (cocrocoorOSHE) Cc: Williams, Allison CDCIOID Powell, Nathaniel Howard, William {Bill} I Martin, Diane sea-tater Elli-1t? Subject: RE: Select Agent question I?m including a and Bill Howard from OSHE on this response so they can address your question Vivarium. regarding airflow requirements in the i -- You are correct in that we do expect notification of events such as air?ow reversals that represent a departure from requirements to ensure for compliance with the select agent regulations, particularly if the situation requires reporting of the event to DSAT. Please do continue to bring such events to our attention. We rely on DSHE and Program personnel to assist in risk assessments to determine whether or not operating irregularities in select agent registered locations rise to the level of reportable events to DSAT. We have been made aware of the airflow irregularities this week as reported by Dr. Williams, but to date OSHE has not indicated that the air?ow issues reported to them constitute loss of containment or a reportable eventto DSAT. lam deferring to - at this point for additional information regarding events this week and for con?rmation as to whether or not the air?ow irregularities noted require submission of a report to DSAT. Thank you for your request for clarification regarding the airflow irregularities. LLE- EEQ-Eil'l'l" From: _ we (CDCXOIDINCEZID) February 23, 2012 1:21 PM Ihli? 42 W: Car'Wiliiams, Allison (coo/oromcezro); Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Subject: Select Agent question 42 C: 5 EBEalh. In my select agent training it was pretty clear about the need to report any irregularities 3?2 'ng select agent areas. So agent room how much air is too much to blow into the clean corridor of BL List/5252 . goes from negative to positive to the clean hallway even when no one is in the animal room. All of the rooms down here will do it with normal everyday traffic so how much is too much? inS,42 26231?:- io-I?i (cocrocoorosHE) From: I Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 ?:33 AM To: 'Powell, Nathaniel (CDCZOIDINCEZID) Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium Please see below. I went down yesterday morning and the problem was the doors closures as originally thought on Friday. There should be no modifications required other than door closures. This did take too long but it should be out to bed today. 1. From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCXOCODJBFO) Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 2:13 AM To: (cocrocooJOSHE); Branch, Ivan (coorocoo/BFO) Bel?eld, Emanuel (CTR) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium The doors were switched. I understand that Clive is going into the hot rooms today to adiust the door closers. Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639-1578 . Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 6:19 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Branch, Ivan (CT Bei?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOIBFD) (CTR) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Subject: Re: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium Did this get done yesterday? From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Wednesda February 22, 2012 10:35 AM To: (cocrocoorosusy, Branch, Ivan (coaocoorsso) (ore); Bel?eld, Emanuel {cocrocooxsroy (CTR) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium tutu? . . - ?320? - are-done- and-they-have-access-into -- -- Ivan will have to coordinate the other 4 rooms From: 232, Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:32 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan Bel?eld, Emanuel (CTR) Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium Is es -. .a . - 252w able-to- get-Into for adjustments and or-door turns -- are hot and will need to enter from inside. He will need to be escorted to or Hot labs. From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Wednesda February 22, 2012 10:16 AM To: it . Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan (CT Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOJBFD) (CTR) Subject: RE: Air ?ow I55ues in Vivarium Wayne has adjusted the door in the one room we couid get il .s you stated Ivan or Clive will have to dress outto check and adjust the remaining doors. Bel is sending Wayne 3,523,? to turn the doors around as we discussed. Ivan . Can you or Clive dress out and check the remaining doors to ensure they are not slamming shut? Thanks Steven Powell FMED Building Manager 404-639?1578 From: Ema"; (CDCXOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:10 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan (CT Subject: RE: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium Please let me know when all the doors have been adjusted. Let?s try and get this done today so we can put it to bed. Than ks El From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 3:15 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoojsro), (CDCIOCDUKOSHE): Branch. Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Subject: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium FSE and I looked at an issue with the airflow from the lab rooms into the clean corridor. When other doors are opened there is a possibilitythat the air flow may go positive for a brief amount of time into the outer clean corridor. As a temporary test we have taped cardboard on the opening in the glass but have left a 3-4" opening. This has increased the negative airflow from the clean corridor through the opening and we tested opening and closing doors and negative air flow was maintained. We will observe these doors tor several days to see if this may help the situation. Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639-1573 era's-read From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 2:13 AM To: Branch, Ivan (ore); Belfield, Emanuel (GDWOGOOJBFO) (CTR) Co: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: Airflow issues in Vivarium The doors were switched. I understand that Clive is going into the hot rooms today to adiust the door closers. Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639-15?8 . (coclocooroSHE) Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 6:19 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCDOJBFO) Belfield, Emanuel (CTR) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re?: Air flow Issues in Vivarium Did this get done yesterday? From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Wednesda February 22, 2012 10:35 AM To: (coclocoorosm; Branch, Ivan (cocxocoozsro) Bel?eld, Emanuel (CTR) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium 'bi'?l are done and they have access into ?mil? will have to coordinate the other 4 rooms From: I Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:32 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan (CTR): Bel?eld, Emanuel (CTR) Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium E: 262mb: He should be able to get into for adjustments and I for door turns [eleaml are hot and will need to enter from inside. He will need to be escorted to lor Hot labs. From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:16 AM To: - (coerocoorosnsj; Probst, Paul E. {cocrocoomrojj Branch, Ivan Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium - - - - you stated ivan or Clive will have to dress out to Wayne has adjusted the door in the on: we could get i lbw? cheek and adjust the remaining sending Wayne u] r. turn the doors around as we discussed. lvan, Can you or Clive dress out and check the remaining doors to ensure they are not slamming shut? Thanks Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639-15?8 From: I I I Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:10 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan (CTR) Subject: RE: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium Please let me know when all the doors have been adjusted. Let?s try and get this done today so we can put it to bed. Than ks From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 3:15 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (coqocoorsFO); Branch, Ivan (cos/ocoorero) (CTR) Subject: Air flow Issues in Vivarium FSE and I looked at an issue with the air flow from the lab rooms into the clean corridor. When other doors are opened there is a possibility that the airflow may go positive for a brief amount of time into the outer olean corridor. As a temporary test we have taped cardboard on the opening in the glass but have left a 3?4? opening. This has increased the negative air ?ow from the clean oorridorthrough the opening and we tested opening and closing doors and negative air flow was maintained. We will observe these doors for several days to see it this may help the situation. Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639-15?8 [midi 41d - (CDCXOCDOJOSHE) From: (cos/ocooxosea Sent: Wednesday, February 22. 2012 5:53 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch. Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) I . on: Howard, William (Bill) (oocrocomosee; (oocrommcezm) Subject: RE: Ai flow Issues in Vivarium As you know OHSE was never a big fan of the oversized slots on those doors so it would not hort ourfeelings to have them changed out. With that said before the December shut down we did not have this issue, so something has changed between then and now. We need to figure out what that change is. From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Tuesdayl February 21, 2012 3:15 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (cocxocooxeFO); (cocxocooroSHE); Branch, Ivan Subject: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium FSE and i looked at an issue with the air flow from the lab rooms into the clean corridor. When other doors are opened there is a possibility that the air flow may go positive for a brief amount of time into the outer clean corridor. As a temporary test we have taped cardboard on the opening in the glass but have left a 3-4" opening. This has increased the negative airflow from the clean corridorthrough the opening and we tested opening and closing doors and negative air flow was maintained. We will observe these doors for several days to see if this may help the situation. Steven Powell Fl'viED Building Manager 404-639-1578 l?jllj' I. From: Sent: To: Subject: . gig-gram E) Powell, Steven L. Tuesday, February 21 2012 3:15 PM Probst, Paul E. Branch, lvan (CDCJOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Airflow Issues in Vivarium FSE and I looked at an issue with the airflow from the lab rooms into the clean corridor. When other doors are opened there is a possibility that the air ?ow may go positive for a briei amount of time into the outer clean corridor. As a temporary test we have taped cardboard on the opening in the glass but have left a 3-4? opening. This has increased the negative air flow from the clean corridor through the opening and we tested opening and closing doors and negative air flow was maintained. We will observe these doors for several days to see if this may help the situation. Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639-1578 Ioiidmz 3 262aih~ (cociocomosuei From: Williams. Allison Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 1:39 PM To: Branch Ivan GDCIOCUOIBFO) (CTR Cc: DGOOKDSHE) Ihii?': Subject: HE:Airllowin ?5-0-5125? Hello ivan. I've been here all morning and have I -- - . At any rate, is the building manager. He should be directed to contact him the facility manager. Thank you. From: Branch, Ivan (CTR) Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 1:35 PM To: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDXNCEZID) Cc: Subject: RE: Air?ow in Clive has tried to contact you this morning in regards to issue. i am sent him back to your office now. 7m 3% Four Seasons Environmental Building #18 Supervisor Phone: 404639-3472 Fax: 404-639-3586 From: Williams, Allison Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 1:32 PM To: ?ii-2? 5-3.9, Branch, Ivan (coczocoorsro) (CTR) Cc: mie- Subject: RE: Air?ow in u?ic??ig'l??aza As of yesterday, it?s not been fixed. From: (cocrocoorosue) Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 1:24 PM To: Wiiliams, Allison (C Branch, Ivan (CTR) Subject: Re: Air?ow inl ?50.2528 Would like to confirm this got taken care of on Friday. Let me know. Thanks From: Powell, Nathaniel (CDCKOIDINCEZID) Sent: Frida February 2012 10:23 AM To: (one ocooiosus) Subject: Re: Air?ow in Thanks for keeping me in the loop . . (cociococvoseey Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 10:0? AM To: Felton, Joe H. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Williams, Allison (CDC/Olorncezm) oc: we (cociomincezro); Davis, Pamela cocrocooiosns); Powell, Nathaniel (cocirOIolNCEZIo) aim: u?ecttite: Thanks Felton et al. Door closures need to be adjusted. Ispoke with Allison and FSE will be down this morning to look at the closures. From: Powell, Nathaniel Sent; Inu?ag, February 16, 2012 04:19 PM To: (CDCXOCOOIOSHE) Cc:l mit- Williams, Allison lie: Air?ow in- We need to address immediately. Please talk with 'i From: (cocirOPHPRiosan Sent: Thursda February 16, 2012 04:13 PM i To: Cc: Powell, Nathaniel lbi'?l? I Good afternoon at al This morning I was a part of an escorted group that walked through of the clean areas in the vivarium wanted to make you all aware of a circumstance that the group encountered. and I'd As the group stood outside the door 0 Lia?r3. in the clean corridor, the ARB technician inside opened the door to the animal room. As the door closed a ver noticeable puff of air could be felt coming through the slit in the window out into the ?clean? corridor. Iwas told bvhat this room does not house infected animals at the present time. However, there is a room with infected animals on this same corridor and ifthis is happening in that room, does OHSIARB feel that there is any risk of expo5ure to someone walking down that hallway without respiratorv protection. Don?t know if this was a fluke or the norm and the reason I?m commenting is one ofthe visitors seemed concerned and has been talking about it since we?ve come back. FYI ibll?l Vision: To be the preeminent resource for safety and security of hioiogical agents and toxins. 2 [0:13:42 262mb: From: Williams, Allison Sent: Tuesday, February 21. 2012 1:39 PM To: Branch Ivan Co: a I cociocoolosneil unis Ironcrommcezm} Subject: RE: Airflow in Hello ivan. l've been here all morning and have not heard from Clive. At any rate, is the building manager. He should be directed to contact him othe facility,r manager. Thank you. From: Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 1:35 PM To: Williams Allison (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Cc: (Cbcxocooyosns) 42 in 262301; 2B2ain': 262mb;- Cc I Clive has tried to contact you this morning in regards to issue. I am sent him back to your office now. 7m 3m Four Seasons Environmental Building #18 Supervisor Phone: 404639-3472 Fax: 4104-6396586 From: Williams, Allison Sent: Tuesda February 21, 2012 1:32 PM To' - CDC OCOO Branch, Ivan (CDCIDCOOIBFO) (CTR) As of yesterday, it?s not been ?xed. From: (CDC/ocoolosnsy Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 1:24 PM TocWilliams, Allison Branch, Ivan (CDCJOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Rai?ir?owin. . Would like to confirm this got taken care of on Fridav. Let me know. Thanks lb) Ia; 252mb:- From: Powell, Nathaniel Sent: Frida February 17, 2012 10:23 AM To: (coc ocooiosnE) Airflow. in Thanks for keeping me in the loop From: -. Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 10:07 AM To: Felton, Joe H. Sheppard, Jeffery.r D. (Jeff) Williams, Allison (cnrmimlicezrol oel ill-?Bl lcocloIo/uceno); (coclomlucezro); Davis, Pamela (cociocooloseiE); Powell, Nathaniel (coclomiiscezm) widest: Re.5..?iril Thanks Felton et al. Door closures need to be adjusted. I spoke with Allison and FSE will be down this morning to look at the closures. l' Frorn: Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID) I Sent: Thursda February 16, 2012 04:19 PM see .. lea rcocioPHPwosm'): (cociocooiosuel as: Williams, Allison Subject: Re: Airflow ir mae- ll'jjl3i'I-5l2 3 cs We need to address immediately. Please talk with 2523m- a?it?faii - we '(cocion?iesiosm Sent: Thursda February 16,r 2012 04:13 PM To: (coo/ocooiOSHE) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel lee. Williams, Allison (coo/oloincmol Subject: Air?ow ir Good afternoon at al This morning i was a part of an escorted group that walked through of the clean areas in the Vivarium wanted to make 1tlou all aware of a circumstance that the group encountered. As the group stood outside the door of; . in the clean corridor, the ARE technician inside opened the door to the animal room. As the door closed a ver noticeable puff of air could be felt coming through the slit in the window out into the "clean" corridor. lwas told bthat this room does not house infected animals at-the present time. However, there is a room with infected animals on this same corridor and if this is happening in that room, does OHSIARB feel that there is any,r risk of exposure to someone walking down that hallway without respiratory protection. Don?t know if this was a fluke or the norm and the reason l?m commenting is one ofthe visitors seemed concerned and has been talking about it since we?ve come back. F?l?l ltIIlEl Vision: To be the preeminent resource for safety and security of biologieoi agents and toxins. 2 I From: Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 1:24 PM To: Williams. Allison Branoh, Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Subject: Fle: Airflow in c. Would like to confirm this got taken care ofon Friday. Let me know. Thanks [El From: Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Frida February 17, 2012 10:23 AM To: (CDCIOCOOIOSH E) $511121? Wells; Re: Airflow. in Thanks for keeping me in the loop . Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 10:07 AM To: Felton, Joe H. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Williams, Allison Col we licoqoxomcezm); Davis, Pamela we" Math:- iel (CDCIOIDKNCEZID) 262mm- Subjects-Rer-Air?ow ir Thanks Felton et al. Door closures need to be adjusted. I spoke with Allison and FSE will be down this morning to look at the closures. [El From: (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Thursda February 16, 2012 04:19 PM To a con .oa; cocono/NCEZID); Williams, Allison i?zaa'a'oif i-n- - We need to address immediately. Please talk with [0:13 42 U313. 2szaln: From: -- CDCIUPHPRIDSAT) Sent: Thursda February 16, 2012 04:13 PM To: (cos/ocoolosrlE) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZIDN lama. Williams, Allison (coo/piomcezro) ??ii?ject; Airflow in Good afternoon at al This morning i was a part of an escorted group that walked through of the clean areas in the vivarium Eli? wanted to make you all aware of a circumstance that the group encountered. As the groUp stood outside the door of :32: the clean corridor, the ARB technician inside opened the door to the animal room. As the door closed a verv noticeable puff ofair could be felt coming through the slit in the window out into the "clean" corridor. Iwas told bthat this room does not house infected animals at the present time. However, there is a room with infecte animals on this same corridor and if this is happening in that room, does OHSIARB feel that there is any risk of exposure to someone walking down that hallway without respiratory protection. Don?t know if this was a fluke or the norm and the reason I?m commenting is one ofthe visitors seemed concerned and has been talking about it since we?ve come back. Vision: To be the preeminent resource for safety and security ofbioiogico! ogen ts and toxins. [Djidizeia 5L. 3 202aih: From: Felton, Joe H. Sent: Friday, FBI 171 2012 10:36 AM TO: ?$533593 Subject: RE: Air?ow in U35 ,3 25 You're a good man From: BEE (cociocooiosaa Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 10:08 AM To: Feiton, Joe H. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Williams, Allison (CDr?i?ThiNf?WTn?l eel 'bi?i (cociocooiosae); Powell, Nathaniel (cocrommcezm) it?aii? . . . Davis, Pamela Thanks Felton et al. Door closures need to be adjusted. I spoke with Allison and FSE will be down this morning to look at the closures. iCi_i lEii From: Powell, Nathaniel (cociommcezio) Se 1" Thlirsriau February 16, 2012 04:19 PM To: as: one OPHPR CDCIOCOOIOSHE) (cociomfmcezro) LI Cc: - - - ??tiject: RELAii?ow- We need to address immediately. Please talk with Cc: Powe a on; Williams! Allison (GDCXOIDINCEZID) I .. . .. Good afternoon at al This morning I was a part of an escorted group that walked through of the clean areas in the Vivarium @333? 3'35 wanted to make you all aware of a circumstance that the group encountered. lbll'Ei 42 U513. 2523"? ?ts-the group-stood-outside the clean corridor, the ARB technician inside opened the door to the animal room. As the door closed a very noticeable puff of air could be felt coming through the slit in the window out into the "clean" corridor. lwas told by hat this room does not house infected animals at the present time. However, there is a room with infecte animals on this same corridor and if this is happening in that room, does feeI that there is am,r risk of exposure to someone walking down that haliway without respiratory protection. Don?t know if this was a fluke or the norm and the reason I'm commenting is one of the visitors seemed concerned and has been talking about it since we?ve come back. FYI rL1 Vision: To be the preeminent resource Jor safety and of biological agents and toxins. logs-'42 0.: L. 252301. From: (GDGIDCOOIOSHE) Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 10:08 AM To: Fallon, Joe H. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Williams. Allison Cc: .. [so ,hociomiuoezm); (coerciciucezm); Davis, Pamel Powell, Nathaniel EZID) Subject: Fie: Airflow in $553433 Thankt al. Door closures need to be adjusted. lspoke with Allison and FSE will be down this morning to look at the closures. [El From: (cocgotomcezm) Se Ihursdatr. February 16, 2012 04:19 PM To: (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Williams, Allison Subject: Re: Airflow in We need to address immediately. Please talk wit zezam' Sent: Thursda February 16, 2012 04:13 PM To: Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Williams, Allison Good afternoon et al This morning I was a part of an escorted group that walked through of the clean areas in the vivariumr USES wanted to make you all aware ofa circumstance that the group encountered. outside-the-door ofin the clean corridor, the technician inside opened the door to the animal room. As the door closed a wen,f noticeable puff ofair could be felt coming through the slit in the window out into the "cIean" corridor. I was told byhat this room does not house infected animals at the present time. However, there is a room with infected animals on this same corridor and if this is happening in that room, does feel that there is any risk of exposure to someone walking down that hallway without respiratory protection. Don?t know ifthis was a fluke or the norm and the reason I'm commenting is one of the visitors seemed concerned and has been talking about it since we?va come back. FYI Vision: To be the preeminent resource for safety and security of bfofagiee! agents and toxins. routs: at. (cocrocooiosa E) From: Sent: Pride Feoruar 2012 7:57 AM To: ?atlr?S?EE?glp . Hazel-til (cocrocooroeHE); Sheppard, Jeffery 0. (Jeff) Felton, Joe H. (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Howard, Willi _rr_1_ term _fC CIOGOOIOSHE) Subieot: FIE: Airflow in $12335 a? All, lam at home today. Don?t know ifthis is a real air flow issue or just the physics ofa closing door. has given his perspective on the are in their primary containment and decon procedures are followed, there is no problem with these ?reversals? of air flow. On another topic, if DSAT is in the Vivarium for training, feel they need to take off their inspector hats and get the training they want. If not, I am ofthe opinion that they need to go elsewhere. Don't know how this got started anyway. IEI From: (coclocooxosnrs) Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 4:19 PM To: Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Felton Joe H. Cc: Howard, William (Bill Subject: Fw: Air?ow in Could you two look into this tomorrow? if so please keep the group minimal and investigate with the help if ARB folks mm Let me know. Thanks Sent: Thursda February 16, 2012 04:13 PM To: Cc: Powell, Nathaniel one Williams, Allison mm Subject: Air?ow in [diseases-a Good afternoon at al . I I ml": 2051s This morning I was a part of an escorted group that walked through ofthe clean areas In the vrvarium of . wanted to make you all aware of a circumstance that the group encountered. As the group stood outside the door of in the clean corridor, the ARB technician inside opened the door to the animal room. As the door closed a ver? notice able puff of air could be felt coming through the slit in the window out into the "clean" corridor. was told b, m5} that this room does not house infected animals at the present time. However, there is a room with infected animals on this same corridor and if this is happening in that room, does DHSXARB feel that there is any risk of exposure to someone walking down that hallway without respiratory protection. Don't know if this was a fluke or the norm and the reason I?m commenting is one of the visitors seemed concerned and has been talking about it since we?ve come back. FYI Vision: To be the preeminent resource for safety and security of bioiogicai agents and toxins. Lib Li [3 REE-Ell'i'l'i From: (CDGIOGOOIOSHEJ Sent: Thursday, February 16. 2012 6:08 PM To: lb, 3 4ng Williams, Allison ss'?s'loi . Fie: Airflow in Sheppard, Felton and will be there first thing in the AM. From: Powell, Nathaniel Ser t: Thursda February 16, 2012 04:19 PM (cociocooxosna 42 Co: mil-e cocrolomceao); Williams, Allison (cocrotoiNCEzm) 2623's: times: seimniowini -- - - We need to address immediately. Please talk with l'bii?': From: Sent: Thursda February 16, 2012 04:13 PM To: (CDCKOCDDIOSHE) Co: .oss; :12 if. licoclomrncezio); Williams, Allison Good afternoon at al This morning [was a part of an escorted group that walked through of the clean areas in the vivarium wanted to make you all aware ofa circumstance that the group encountered. inagi'ii door of in the clean corridor, the ARB technician inside opened the door to the animal room. As the door closed a veriir noticeable puff of air could be felt coming through the slit in the window out into the ?clean? corridor. was told by Mimi that this room does not house infected animals at the present time. However, there is a room with infected animals on this same corridor and if this is happening in that room, does feel that there is any risk of exposure to someone walking down that hallway without respiratory protection. Don't know if this was a fluke or the norm and the reason i?m commenting is one of the visitors seemed concerned and has been talking about it since we?ve come back. FYI Vision: To be the preeminent resource for safety and security of biologicoi' ogen ts and toxins. t; 2523 (coo/ocoo/osn E) From: E) Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 4:19 PM To: Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Felton Joe H. Cc: Howard, Subject: Fw: Airflow in Ih: Could you two look into this tomorrow? If so please keep the group minimal and investigate with the help if ARE folks and Let me know. Thanks From: Sent: Thursda February 16, 2012 04:13 PM To: (cocrocooroSHE) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel we: I (cocroromcezro); Williams, Allison a Subject: Air?ow in 42 U5 6' 2?23 Good afternoon at al bji3?i42 This morning i was a part of an escorted group that walked through of the clean areas in the vivariumt -- wanted to make you all aware ofa circumstance that the group encountered. As the group stood outside the door 0 i: 35 in the clean corridor, the ARB technician inside opened the door to the animal room. As the door closed a very noticeable puff ofair could be felt coming through the slit in the window out into the ?clean? corridor. I was told by hat this room does not house infected animals at the present time. However, there is a room with infected animals on this same corridor and if this is happening in that room, does OHSIARB feel that there is anvl risk of exposure to someone walking down that hallway without respirators,I protection. Don?t know if this was a fluke or the norm and the reason I'm commenting is one ofthe visitors seemed concerned and has been talking about it since we?ve come back. FYI Ib??'Ei Vision: To be the preeminent resource for safety and security of biological agents and toxins. dd i - Isis-pg (cociocooiow E) From: Sent: Thursda February 16. 2012 4:14 PM To: I Cc: 'th- lm W: . Subieot: Airflow in use 5 Good afternoon at at This morning 1 was a part of an escorted group that walked through of the clean areas in the vivariu wanted to make you all aware ofa circumstance that the group encountered. As the group stood outside the door of ?5 5? the clean corridor, the ARB technician inside opened the door to the animal room. As the door closed a very noticeable puff ofair could be felt coming through the slit in the window out into the ?clean? corridor. [was told that this room does not house infected animals at the present time. However, there is a room with infected animals on this same corridor and if this is happening in that room, does DHSJARB feel that there is any risk of eXposure to someone walking down that hallway without respiratory protection. Don?t know if this was a fluke or the norm and the reason I'm commenting is one ofthe visitors seemed concerned and has been talking about it since we?ve come back. FYI Willi" Vision: To be the preeminent resource Jar safety and secaFiiy of bioiogicai agents and toxins. Item-'42 5 I From: Lasky. Robert D. (CDCIDCOOHOSHE) Sent: Wednesda June 27, 2012 7:49 AM To: mesa LEE Subject: FW: Vivarium airflow tests From: traits} Senmuil'sda ember 22, 2011 10:17 AM on Cc: Proust, Pa . Howard William (Bill) Bowen, Ken L. I rut-5i on Weyant, Rob new}: Subject: RE: Vivarium air?ow tests testis not The HVAC verification of the select agent registered space at your facility has been successfully completed. I would like to express my very sincere thanks to everyone involved in the extensive work needed to perform and document these tests. Thank you all very much, and I hope that everyone has a Merry Christmas. Yours truly, vision: to be the preeminent resource for the safety and security of biological agents and toxins. This document is Intended for the exclusive use of the recipientisl named above. It may contain sensitive Information that is protectedoriviledgod, or confidential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed. or copied to person-s not auth?rlzed to receive such information. If you are not the intended recipientis], be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this document :23 Strictly prohibited. If you think yOu have recewed this dowmem in error. please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. Thank you. 61"" ,r r. From: Lasky, Robert 0. (cocrocooxosnc) Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 10:03 AM "uncut. $3;ng coarsest, Paul E. Howard, William (Bill) Laskv, Robert D. Subject: Vivarium air?ow tests All, I met with from an earlier this morning to clarify points of observation during the Dec. 20 testing of airflows in the building vivarium. A floor plan indicating where airflow was monitored and the directional airflow observed was given to after our meeting. The plan shows testing was performed at ante room entrances, procedure room entrances, and animal holding area exits. Also, autoclave area and shower room entrances. Hope this helps to better inform everyone. Happy Holidays. Dwayne Laskv Safety and Occupational Health Manager Office of Safety. Health and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention use 5 From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesca. June 13, 2012 8:25 PM To: J: (CDCIOCGOIDSHE) $353117? . .. Vivarium Egress Thanks, Paul Probst From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, June 2012 1:09 PM Jue, Bruc 5322's? l?l?ect: - Vivarium Egress Jeff W. may be calling you regarding this matter. Thanks, Paul P'robst From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM To: Williams, Jeffery .. . ivarium Egress Jeff: - This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about In late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In. the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 1'5 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greaterthan three times that amount (45 Ibf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 7.2.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force tor existing doors to not exceed 501bf. Since the project modified air I flow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance With the-code. Please reply with your thoughts. I Paul Probst Attachments: 1. 0x Fleport 2. NFPA101 ?2000 3. ASHRAE Formula Missal-4 - CDC NFPA 1o1 - ashrae Formula.de zone-d For ease of reference. this is what the OK report states: ?The Commissioning (Bx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 Life Safety Handbook?. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code- Also. on some doors the excessive negative pressure . prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushlpull the door inwardloutward before turning the handle and opening the door." 252a'h? From: Williams. Jetiery (CDCIDGDOIBFO) Sent: Frida Janua 28, 2011 4:21 PM To: (cocrocooro8HE) Cc: Bowen, Keri L. (CDCIOGOOIBFO Howard William {Bill} Zambuto, Laura a. (coerciorncmo); (cos/olorucezm); Chandler, George rcocrocooraroi; F'robst. Paul E. (coo ocooreFoy Subject: RE: Vivarium The vivarium will be ready to be re-occupied by the program on Monday morning, t. The space is essentially ready now with one minor activity to be performed this weekend in the interstitial. Every attempt has been made to ensure that delays are kept to a minimum. The project team has compressed schedule activities. extended working hours, fabrication schedules. etc. over the last several months in order to deliver this space as promised. We are always diligent in ensuring that quality controlfassurance is performed thoroughly in all phases of execution and this sometimes presents us with tough circumstances and decisions. We do understand and appreciate the importance of your mission and apologize for any inconveniences this may have caused the program. Thanks again for your patience. Jeff Williams Deputy Director 770.488.3089 we: From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 2011 10:54 AM To: Williams, Jeffery Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: FW: Vivarium From: Sent: Thursday, January 2011 10:27 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) liq? Subject: Vivarium Zambuto, Laura R. it has come to my attention that Karen Moss is requesting more delays forthe programs regarding the operations of the vivarium in Apparently there are some fire damper issues that will require entry into vivarium animal space. I My question is why is this being brought up know and again delaying the programs. Apparently it was known earlier and I an attempt was made to get the contractor in to make the repairs before they went hot. It looks like they are now trying to get back in again tomorrow to complete or finish the fix. has been planning all week to go hot tomorrow with appropriate notices sent out. would like to find out if all attempts have been made to have this work done today or after hours tonight so as to not delay the programs. We had delays last week and down time all of this week to make repairs. Thanks use 3. 9 (coo/ocooiosn E) From: . Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:27 AM To: Proost. Paul E. Cc: Howard, William (Bill) . Zambuto, Laura Fl. . Subject: Vi?arium It has com a attention that Karen Moss is requesting more delays for the programs regarding the operations of the Vivarium in Apparently there are some fire damper issues that will require entry into Vivarium animal space. My question is why is this being brought up know and again delaying the programs. Apparently it was known earlier and an attempt was made to get the contractor in to make the repairs before they went hot. It looks like they are now trying to get back in again tomorrow to complete orfinish the fix. has been planning all week to go hot tomorrow with appropriate notices sent out. i would like to find out itail attempts have been made to have this work done today or after hours tonight so as to not delay the programs. We had delays last week and down time all ofthis week to make repairs. Thanks El Ltbt- 3 252alh' Co: Subject: ll) coo olo woe i (CDCIDCOOIOSHE) FW: Vivarium (CDCIOCOOXOSH E) i - (coo/ommcezm) Friday, January 21, 2011 11:33 AM Zambuto. Laura Fi. "F?lf?f?lhl?lklr? Damon. Inger K. rb_.iE: See below. The vivarium is ready to begin work. I am looking into a reader issue, but will get that resolved today. -.. -m-Original Message?w From: (cocxocoozosnel Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:5? AM To: Cc: Probst, Paul E. {cot/ocoojarol; Howard, William {Bill} Subject: Vivarium Both OSHE and BFO have given the all clear for work to begin in the vivarium. Programs should think about stocking supplies in the central corridor before going hot. has indicated they have ferrets in the?f would like to get over to Let me know when it goes hot. Thanks lb} l?l I From: Sent: Frida Janus To: (CDCIOCOOKOSHE) Subject: RE: Vivarium Right you are. Enjoy whatever. From: Sent: Frida Janua 21, 2011 11:22 AM To: (cocrororncezro) Subject: RE: Vivarium i figured you are the manager that is should come from you. Also. since you are working on the card reader I didn't want to step on anyone's toes. Enjoy. it is too cold outside for me to enjoy anything right now. Thanks El From: (cocxororNCEZI D) Sent: Fri 1f21 2011 11:09 AM To: Subject: RE: Vivarium [groom 1 send out the message to the programs now or have they already been informed? From: Hm (co crocoorosas) Sent: Friday, Januar 21, 2011 10:57 AM To: main Cc: Probst, Paul E. Howard, William (Bill) Subject: Vivarium . .1 9 Both OBI-IE and BFO have given the all clear for work to begin in the vivarium. Programs should think about stocking supplies in the central corridor before going hot. :3 Laura has indicated they have ferrets in hey would like to get over to 4 let me know when it goes hot. Thanks (CDCIOCOOIOSH E) From: I Sent: Eridavuanua 21.2011 To: Subject: RE: Vivarium Should I send out the message to the programs now or have they already been informed? El From: Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:57 AM To: Cc: Probst, Paul E- Howard, William (Bill) (CDCKUCOOIDSHQ Subject: Vivarium Both OSHE and BFO have given the all clear for work to begin in the vivarium. Programs should think about stocking supplies in the central corridor before going hot. [b i Laura has indicated they have ferrets in they would like to get over to [if Let me know when it goes hot. W?'n Thanks El Thursday. January 20, 2011 11:22 AM Moss. Karen (CDCIDCCOXBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Subject: Re: Vivarium Thanks. Just let us know. ii From: Moss, Karen CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: (cocrocoorOSHE) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thu Jan 20 11:07:28 2011 Subject: RE: Vivarium i am going to be there with the contractor at 1:00 p.m. today to inspect. FYI Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Fioad N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 710-438-330? Cell: 404-825-6027 Fax: 2520-1188-2667 email: From: {cocmcoorosna Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 10:44 AM To: MossJr Karen Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: Vivarium UK. Just let us know. Hope you feel better. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesda January 18, 2011 10:28 AM To: (cociocoorosns) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium l' Itljlo, Yes it has been done but needs to be reinepeoted hopefully I will be well enough to do tomorrow. Karen Moss PE. To: Moss, Karen Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tue Jan 18 09:23:07 2011 Subject: Vivarium Karen We are trying to get ?the programs back into the Vivarium. I know there was some worked scheduled for last week to seal some of the new duct work in the Vivarium, did that been completed? Is there anything else that we are walting on? Thanks. I From: Sent: Tuesday. January 18, 2011 5:13 PM To: Zambuto, Laura a. Subiect: RE: Vivarium See what the morning brings with the repair of the reader. May be good to go. From: Zambuto, Laura R. Sent: Tuesda January 18, 2011 4:10 PM To: cocrocoorosusy Cc: - Subject: RE: Vivarium We did our walk throughs last week and I had everyone sign off on the new procedures. Everyone is comfortable with the new set-Up. Laura (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 To: Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Subject: RE: Vivarium I did the walk through today and I have no issues. However, you have a card readerl -- .. green. The door is secured and opens when you scan your badge butthe green light is on all the time. [would have Mr. Buohheit take a look at. Maybe you oroan submit that to him. Apparently Karen Moss had the folks do some work on the duct work last week. I contacted her today but she is out siok. She hopes to be in tomorrow so she can verify the work that was done. If she doesn't make it in tomorrow. Paul Probst should be back as well so maybe we can get him to take a look. It is something needs to sign off on. I would prepare for this week as much as you can but can't guarantee until all is signed off. Have you done a walk through with your people? Do we want to do a walk through with everyone together? From: Zambutor Laura R. (CDCIOIDJNCIRD) Sent: Tuesda January 18, 2011 12:53 PM . . (CDCIOCDOIOSHE) Subject: Re: Vivarium How was the walk through today? When can we move back in? Sent from my BlaokBerry Wireless Devioo From: (CDCIOCOOJOSHEJ To: Zambutoy Laura R. (CDCIOIDJNCIRD Cc: Probst, Paul E. . 1 3 i Sent: Fri Jan 14 14:16:28 2011 Subject: Re: Vivarium I don't think so. if there are any issues I will keep you in the loop. Paul can you please update us on the duct work Karen needs to get done. Than ks From: Zambuto Laura R. To: (cocrocooroms) Sent: Fri Jan 14 14:12:15 2011 Subject: RE: Vivarium We can't schedule any animals until we know the Vivarium is ready to go. Do you need a rep for the walk through on Tuesday? From: (cocrocooyoms) Sent: Fridaynr January 14, 2011 2:11 PM To: Zambuto, Laura R. Subject: Re: Vivarium 1 will do it on tuesday. I heard today the contractor needs to come in and seal some duct work next week. When do you have animals scheduled to come in? [El From: Zambuto Laura R. To: (cocrocoorOSHE); Sent: Fri Jan 14 13:11:03 2011 . Subject: Vivarium (cocroromcezro) suspect that the Vivarium walk through did not happen on Monday. Is there a new one scheduled? Thanks, Laura 42 LI Ci.? 2E2a-h' From: Sent: Tuesday. January 18. 2011 10:44 AM To: Moss, Karen Co: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: Vivarium OK. Just let us know. Hope you feel better. El From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesda January 18, 2011 10:28 AM To: (cocrocoorosna Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium (I Yes it has been done but needsto be reinspeote hopefully I will be well enough to do tomorrow. Karen Moss P.E. From: (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) To: Moss, Karen Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tue Jan 18 09:23:07? 2011 Subject: Vivarium Karen We are trying to get the programs back into the vivarium. I know there was some worked scheduled for last week to seal some of the new duct work in the vivarium. did that been completed? is there anything else that we are waiting on? Thanks. [reggae?- a From: . (coprocoorosrret Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:5? AM To: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCDOIDSHE) Subiect: RE: Important We are handling it and will be OK. Will update you later. From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Tuesda January 18, 2011 9:56 AM To: met Subject: Re: Important Not happy William Howard Acting BiosafetylFacilities Team Leader Office Safety' Health and Environment 404.639.21?4 678.614.7257 From: (coclocoorosnE) To: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Tue Jan 18 08:12:21 2011 Subject: Important was reviewing documents tor the Vivarium to write up a memo to give the all clear. i noticed this in the commissioning documents from Karen. I don't know if I am comfortable with this document out there and me giving the all clear. Thoughts? Upon dual supply,r fan shut down, egress from the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by The Commissioning (CK) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook"- The maximum alIowabie force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the releaSe of the electronic securin latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushlpull dte door inwardg'nutward before turning the handle and opening the door. Differentials acmss Suite Egress Doors :12 5 532523?.- Itll[3: :12 E?Ealh inns?'42 Ll an; a 252mm Subject: All, E) Moss, Karen Friday, January 14, 2011 3:00 PM Proust, Paul E. BFO . Howard, William (coolocooloseel; - loo - ooiosua; Meechan, PaulJ. Lingler, Arthur Ft. Daniels, Charles E. Blanchard, Thomas M. Nogueira, William P. Tyler, John (CDC luariurn Per requested attached is the (I): Report front Air Analysis and drawings showing the actual ?nal airflows as set by Air Analysis and the measured pressure differential across the doors. Cali if you have questions. Regards, CDC P200945 ARI TAB Actual (2th Floor Elldg U. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer 52 . (TH and Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-525-632? Fax: email: From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCICCOOKBFD) Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:32 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) DVivarium Karen/Art: Copying you on an e?mail sent by to the programs he appears to be of the opinion of FMEO and OSHE that the results show success. Karen - regarding items 2 and 3 below. will Air Analysis be turning ouer something we can share? Please call if mils: 262mb:- 2628015 Ib.~l3 42 262mb? Thanks. Paul 404?639-0505 From: 'gnili'gi??zll [Eng-?Eii??EI Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:26 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCXOCDOIBFO) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (cociocooiosm); - Vivarium Paul, I think there needs to be 1] a simple statementfmemo from OSHE to the programs on their take may have a checklist from the final walk through}, 21a BFO document simva outlining the testing performed (Dec 28} and results {is the contractor providing something?}, and 3) there needs to be some documentation of the ?new? air flow in the area that can be presented to DSAT can provide a snapshot of numbers right before it is ready to be occupied). If is involved, there might something else that the R0 Would want. Need to discuss this, but I think these don?t need to be more than 1 page each. Keep it simple. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesda December 29, 2010 1:39 PM To: Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocooiosnis) Subject: RE: Vivarium What kind of ?report and associated documents? are we talking about? Thanks. Paul 404-639?0505 From: Enid-$2354 553m: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 8:44 AM [bg-[Ei WE All, The commissioninghesting of the appears to have gone very well (Dec 28], and I believe programs should expect a report and associated documents indicating this sometime in January. The return to service date oflan 10 is still in effect, as there are a few things that need to be fixed and installed, followed by a ?nal clean up by Goodwill. 2 . {cpcrotorucczm)mam Ufa "Edgar l1: CDCXOIDXNCEZID) (cocrocoorOSHE); Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. (CDC/ocooiarm There is now a need for program operation protocols to be modi?ed to re?ect changes in entering, reentering, exiting, etc. This will be a major agenda item for the Jan 13 HOG meeting. When ready, please send the ?les to OSHE and I for review. Manx:r thanks to all those who contributed to the looks very good and is a major improvement to the facility. tollszazusog 252aih' E) From: Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:16 PM To: Zambuto. Laura Ft. Cc: F'robst, Paul E. EEK-Q {coclolomcezmi Subiect: Fla: Vivarium I don't think so. 11 there are any issues i will keep you in the loop. Paul can you please update us on the duct work needs to get done. Thanks El From: Zambuto Laura R. To: (CDCKOCOOXOSHE) Sent: Fri Jan 14 14:12:15 2011 Subject: RE: Vivarium We can't schedule any animals until we know the Vivarium is ready to go. Do you need a rep for the walk through on Tuesday? From: (coolocoolosuE) Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:11 PM To: Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCXOIDINCIRD) Subject: Re: Vivarium I will do it on toesday. I heard today the contractor needs to come in and seal some duct work next week. When do you have animals scheduled to some in? El From: Zambth Laura R. To: met (cocxocooloSHE); (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Fri Jan 14 13:11:03 2011 Subject: Vivarium I suspect that the Vivarium walk through did not happen on Monday. Is there a new one scheduled? Thanks, Laura IElledi242 1.1.5.1.: 3 2623 I'll swat-en (coo/ocoo/osn E) From: a Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 11:14 AM To: Williams. Allison (sociololnceaol; Zambuto. n. (CDGKOIDINCIFID coo DID Cc: (GDGIOIDINCEZID) Subject: RE: Vivarium procedures Same for TB as well. So. there are a few things happening there today and tomorrow that need to get completed. I will do a of the space on Monday to clear things. I will be doing a standard commissioning walk through everyone is accustomed to. Before Monday it the programs can get the appropriate decon and autoclave supplies into their area that would be good. Do any of you need any special assistance getting anything or something done for this area before it goes back on line. Thanks From: Williams, Allison Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 10:41 AM To: Zambuto Laura R. (cocloIolncmo); Cc: (CDCIOIDINCEZIDJ Subject: Re: Vivarium procedures Ditto for ARE. Allison Williams, DVM From: Zambuto Laura R. To; Cc: I a . (CDCJOIDINCEZID, Sent: Thu Jan 06 10:34:31 2011 Subject: RE: Vivarium procedures Williams, Allison That is the Plan. From: Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2011 10:34 AM To: Zambuto, Laura R. Williams, Allison Cc: Subject: Vivarium procedures So as I am reading everybody's procedures, all programs will be wearing their in the central corridor and exiting with rem - - he in the change area or if needed donning new tyvek in the central corridor and re-entering only like labs 3.3554? (TB- . is this correct? Just trying to make sure everyone is on the same page. ions 4-: LL: :3 262mm From: Sent: Thursda January 06, 2011 10:47 AM To: (coo/ocoorosnel; Zambuto, Laura a. (coordioincmo); as: Williams, Allison Subject: FIE: Vivarium procedures FYI, Cleanup will be completed by 2:30 today. Stocking of PPE (Tvvek, gloves, toot covers] and other items in the common anteroomfcentral corridor can take place afterward. I have installed a computer with attached Fujitsu scanner in the necropsy room for sending out records to your network drives (anyone can log on to the machine and when through, just log out when through]. i think leaving the computer on or turning it off (say on Friday) is something the users can decide on. It is looking very good. From: (CDCJOCOOKOSHE) Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 10:34 - ii To: Zambuto Laura R. Williams, Allison Cc: Subject: Vivarium procedures So as I am reading everybody's procedures, all programs will be wearing their PAPRs in the central corridor and exiting ,1 emoval of the in area or if needed donning new tyvek in the central corridor and renentering only ?giq? i Is this correct? Just trying to make sure everyone is on the same page. Thanks II gulf?HE, From: (oocrommoHHsr-P) Sent: Thureda . January 06. 2011 10:46 AM To: 5 Co: Posey. James E. Nandakumar, Subhadra Subject: FIE: Vivarium procedures That's correct for TB (no re-entrv in the labs). In case we have another room for aerosol challenge as promised before, we have to change the procedure. Thanks From: (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 10:34 A. To:Zambuto Laura Cc: Subject: Vivarium procedures So as I am reading everybody's procedures, all programs will be wearing their PAPRs in the central corridor and exiting with removal of the in me ohan area or if needed donning newtvvek in the central corridor and re-entering only 5535:? is this oorreot? Just trying to make sure everyone is on the same page. Thanks lnndi'll-JJ Lib 1.1.: 2523m- (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) From: Williams, Allison Sent: Thursday. January 06. 2011 10:41 AM To: Zambuto, Laura a. (coordiorucmo); (oocrocoorosuei .cocror Cc: (coerciorucezm) Subject: Re: Vivarium procedures Ditto for ARE. Allison Williams. DVM From: Zambuto Laura R. To:l. (coqocoorosua ?are Williams, Allison oc- Sent: Thu an 06 10:34:31 2011 Subject: RE: Vivarium procedures That is the Plan. Laura From: . Perle-gag (cocrocooroSHE) Sent: Thursday. January 06, 2011 10:34 I To: zambuto, Laura R. Williams, Allison Cc: (cocroromcezro) Subject: Vivarium procedures So as I am reading euerybody's procedures. all programs will be wearing their PAPRs in the central corridor and. exiting with removal of the PAPFI int area or if needed donning new tyvek in the central corridor and re-entertng only $931112 'likr??abs- (TB-none), "?33 . Is this correct? Just trying to make sure everyone is on the same page. Thanks Lit. L. 2523 hi E) From: Zambuto, Laura Ft. Sent: Thursda .January 08, 2011 10:35 AM To: (cocrocoormHE); .aa Williams. Allison cocrom Cc: Subiect: RE: Vivarium procedures That is the Plan. Laura From: Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 10:34 AM To: Zambuto, Laura R. Williams, Allison (escrow/wean) Cc: (coordiomcezio) Subject: Vivarium procedures So as I am reading everybodv's procedures, all programs will be wearing their PAPRs in the central corridor and exiting with removal of the PAPR in the chane area or it needed donning new tvvek in the central corridor and re-entering only $3543? . is this correct? Just trying to make sure everyone is on the same page. Thanks [Illicit-12 a 262ail1'- From: Sent: To: Subject: Here is the TB upda El . Thursda January 06, 2011 3:35 AM FW: Vivarium procedures ted procedure doc. Fro I we I sen Il'J'lI'Er'cnlE LIE C: ?252alhi "Jaw 05? To: Ebe??ii??if? -- icii?l 2:32am Subiect: RE: Vivari El Kindly ?nd attached modi?ed entry/exit procedure document for Bld. um entry/exit procedures In; 9 I I C: need further changes or other information then please let me know. Thanks ml. Entrv and Exit Procedures For From: 'gg-gz?d (cocrotomcezlo) rivarium r00 for your review. If you lison (cocromrncezxo) 53 t- Wednesd'y,,3anuary 05, 2011' 3:43 AM o. Zambuto, Laura R. Williams, A i. Carroll, Darin run-e. Cc: . . Subject: Vivarium procedures All, Just a friendly reminder that modi?ed entrw'exit procedures for the ivarium need to be provided for review prior to beginning work. We will have Goodwill do a cleanup of the facility starting tomorrow that may extend into F?dayi U5 Ch? 2'323Ih?. From: Zambuto. Laura Fl. (CDCIOIDINCIFID) Sent: Wednesdav, Janu an,' 05, 2011 1:5? PM To: Hera-zed (CDCIOCOOIOSHEI Subject: RE: Vivarium procedures and Here are the updated entry and exit procedures for the Vivarium. Please let me know what you think so I can make sure all of the laboratorians review them before we go hot. Thanks, Laura Update Procedures .110. .. From: Sent: Wednesdayl January 05, 2011 8:43 AM Zamhuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDINCIRD Williams, Allison (cocrotomcezlo); Carroll, Darin gorge? cc: I mirage: [wow-M - 3' -- Subject: Vivarium entrw'exit procedures uses 252ar 1 - - All, Just a reminder that modi?ed entrw?exit procedures for the 3? prior to beginning work. We will have Goodwill do a cleanup of the facility starting tomorrow that may extend into Friday. lDiler-Siz LL: L- 3- 2623 h!- From: (oocroio/Noezm) Sent: January 05. 2011 8:43 AM To: me: ambuto. Laura H. Williams, Allison . Carroll. Darin ?El-42% (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Cc: me: me Subject: Vivarium procedures All, Just a friendly reminder that modified procedures for the Vivarium need to be provided for review prior to beginning work. We will have Goodwill do a cleanup of the facility starting tomorrow that may extend into F?dav. IDililiilc' bi. 252aih. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednasca December 29, 2010 2:28 PM To: (CDCIOIDJNCEZID) Cc: Howard, William Hill} ?9 U-E 3523"? (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: HEzivarium 2 LJ 0k, we'll see what we can do. Thanks, Paul 4041-6390505 From: I Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:26 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc; Howard, 1 illiam (Bill) (coclocoolome); Itllf'3- 42 252th ??bfecn RE: Jivarium Paul, I think there needs to be 1} a simple statement/memo from USHE to the programs on their take may have a checklist from the final walk through}, 2) a BFO document simva outlining the testing performed (Dec 28) and results [is the contractor providing something?), and 3) there needs to be some documentation ofthe "new" air flow in the area. that can be presented to DSAT (Roman can provide a snapshot of numbers right before it is ready to be occupied). if il is involved, there might something else that the R0 would want. Need to discuss this, but I think these don?t need to be more than 1 page each. Keep it simple. a Lh'i3r4 2E2alh'. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesda December 29, 2010 1:39 PM To: (Cocxommcezm) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCJOCDDYOSHE) RE: DVivarium What kind of ?report and associated documents" are we talking about? Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: II 'gmg'd'??nl . ., Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 8:44 AM . - (coo/Olo/Ncezto); Damon, Inger K. (one: Posey, James E. 1 (mom I I f? i 262mm I:l start? 9 . 252m . I Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. . v'ivarium All, The commissioning/testing of the {53354; 25 Vivarium appears to have gone very well [Dec 28), and I believe programs should expect a report and associated documents indicating this sometime in January. The return to service date ofJan 10 is still in effect, as there are a few things that need to be fixed and installed, followed by a final clean up by Goodwill. There is now a need for program operation protocols to be modi?ed to reflect changes in entering, reentering, exiting, etc. This will be a major agenda item for the Jan 13 HOG meeting. When ready, please send the files to OSHE and for review. Many thanks to all those who contributed to the looks very good and is a major improvement to the facility. .52? L-. 5' 202mb: '9 E) From: Moss, Karen (GDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 2:51 PM To: l-loward, William (Bill) (cocrocoorosns); Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Tvler, John Lingler, Arthur Fl. Subject: RE: Suite pressures in full AHU failure mode. Do you not want to maintain the Vivarium negative? Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30383 Office: noses-sac? Cell: 404?825?682? Fax: email: Krglossl [almogov From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCKOCOOJOSHE) Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 9:12 AM To: Moss, Karen (coo/ocoorsso); Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoorsFo); (coo/ocoorossa Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Tyler, John Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Subject: RE: Suite pressures in full AHU failure mode. Karen, Is it possible to establish a sequence of: If both supva fans fail, both exhaust fans will also fail, creating a static condition." From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 12:36 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Hovvard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Tyler, John Lingler, Arthur R. Moss, Karen Subject: FW: Suite pressures in full AHU failure mode. Gentlemen, Refer to the e-mail below from Test and Balance. See attached chart from ASHRAE and note that for a 40" wide door the amount offorce required to open the door at 0.5 to 0.56 is off the chart. I calculated approximater 40 lb of force to open the door under the severe negative pressures noted bv Test and Balance. Refer to ADA {14.13.11} requirement of maximum force of 5 lbs. We have a egress issue and code violation issue here. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Fload NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 U?ice: Cell; 404-325-532? Fax: amass-ass? email: EMcscigal-cdcgov From: Gordon Verwers Sent: Thursday, December 16,. 2010 3:18 PM To: Moss, Karen Subject: Suite in full AHU failure mode. Karen, 42 Per your request the results of the suite pressures in a 5e 25 failure made are noted UBIUW. We have tested the suite in full AHU failure and the EFs dropped to one fan and the bypass and header dampers both opened fully in this failure mode we tested -0.50?w.c. to -D.58?w.c. in the lab at the two main exit doors. The incinerator room was creating air whistling noise-at the door and the outside air intake dampers. Respectfully. gore?on Li. ?Vermeer Air Analysis of Atianta. in: 7370-9296 IES Of?ce 0e. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOEBFO) Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 10:35 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (cocxocoolsFo);lsE= t; Walpole, Kenneth K. (enclocooloSHE); Howard, William (Bill) Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: Meeting Minutes All, Attached are the minutes from this morning's meeting. Let me know if you have any additions or revisions to make. Thank you, VAC Mod. I ommission Meeting Minutes Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1800 Clifton Flood N.E. MS Atlanta. Georgia 80333 Oi?oe: Cetl: 404-325?682? Fax: email: KMoss'ngt clogov LU Mattie, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: i I RC 511.! .. 25, 2009101219.?? To: sit!" (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOGOOIBFO) Subject: {bi(3i:42 Li 5 333:2?5 There are no plans to do any changes in the vivarium during this Thursday outage. There is a project in the system to redo the air in the vivarium however I don't think it has been approved at this time. Thanks. KenL Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-639?3303 Office 404-639-0499 Fax Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business sewioes. CDC. Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. Mathe, Chester (000:000010553) From: Sent: Wednesday. March 25, 2009 12:32 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: FW: Newly Added Project Team Member There seems to be some misunderstanding with regarding this and i have since talked to him. When this came through last week Steve and Ted asked me if this was still a goodlneeded project. I told them that initially this was an OHS call made before the HOG and before the programs moved into the vivariurn. Since the programs are now working in the Vivarium and the HOG is in charge that it needed to go through the HOG for approval. Once the HOG made a decision whether they thought it was worth while project then FMEO could continue on their end. Sorry if there was any confusion. From: ifms (CDC) .Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 9:40 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Koob, Stephen H. Nogueira, Wiliiam P. Haney, Michael Ford, Maria Cristina Subject: Newly Added Project Team Member You have iust been added as a team member to Project# 2009453 - HVAC Modi?cations for 0.3.0. 7'Fi9ai'h?1 . Mm-v- ?Iqirojectiidmber: 20-09453- I Proj cot Name: HVAC Modi?cations for Asset ID: Asset Name: Roybal Building {Digit-42 USE. 262001} Please contact IFMS Support at 770-488-2773, if you have any questions or need assistance. r, I From: - (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Friday. March 27, 2009 8:55 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Koob, Stephen H. Howard. William (Bill) (CDCJOCOOIDSHE) Subject: Vivarium Ken. make th aositive) would be It would improve safety and make working in the facility simpler and less laborious. course, such a project is responsibility to evaluate and hopefully implement. If there is anything that the HOG can do to facilitate this process, please let us know and we will assist in any way we can. Thanks folgvour consideration. lit-42 In the HOG meetin esterday it was agreedfdecided that a project to explore the reversal of air flow in the Vivarium (to USE: 2E2alhi Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Friday, March 271 2009 9:22 AM To: Hyatt, Ted D. Koob, Stephen H. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Cc; Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Steve. For the reversing of the air in the Vivarium you need to include a scope and justification in IFMS. Once this get done l'm assuming Ted you putting it on the AMT agenda for approval? Then we can reassign it to DEMO. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404?639n3303 Office d04?639?0499 Fax Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Friday. March 2009 9:44 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Hyatt, Ted D. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 Monday but honestly I do not want to turn this over to DEMO. I want to show how quickly a project can be done without the mess it goes through now. The only problem with doing it this way our customers will always want it this way and we have enough issues without doing DEMO amd CIMO jobs also Sent from my BlaokElerry Wireless Handheld From: Bowen, Ken 1.. To: Hyatt, Ted D. Koob, Stephen H. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Fri Mar 2? 09:31:04 2009 Subject: RE: P2009453 Then all we need is the scope and lusttication put in IFMS. Steve can you get this next week? Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office Office 404-639e0499 Fax From: Hyatt, Ted D. Sent: Friday, March 2009 9:25 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Koob, Stephen H. Subject: RE: P2009453 Yep..it's already on the AMT New Projs list Small RBI (<$110k) Ted Hyatt FMEO Assist. Dir. 404-639-0329 From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCKOCDDIBFDJ Sent: Friday, March 20-09 9:22 AM To: Hyatt, Ted D. (CDCIGCODIBFO): Koch, Stephen H. (CDCIDCODIBFD) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: P2009453 Steve, For the reversing of the air in the Vivarium you need to include a scope and justification in IFMS. Once this get done I'm assuming Ted you putting it on the AMT agenda for approval? Then we can reassign it to DEMO. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404?639-3303 Office 404?639?0499 Fax Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 0:31 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Prob aul E. COOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 and RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivariumi?'?gi Karen bi There is no control issue since we post commissioned this and fixed this issue with under the ?3142 project. We saw after the building was taken over in December 2005 that the maintenance lockout mode was not working and it operated such that the two positioned damper did not shut but wentwide open. We had them change it to close the two position damper and use the modulating damper to maintain static but even with one of the fans off the modulating damper went shut and the two position damper shut it could not maintain the static. In other words with both dampers shut the static could not be maintained. Now in my opinion you can throw the balancing report. GBA report away and start over. Just tell us what is needed and we will see that it is done. One thing that you may or may not know is that if you think the flows that you see on the BAS are correct you are badly mistaken. The sensors are not properly installed in the duct work to get an accurate reading and there is no good place to put them with the way the ductwork is configured. The ET's taken a shortridge and traverses the duct every year to try and calibrate the sensors but it has been futile because of the locations. We use these readings for the ALLACC reports. Also I told you they issued a change to reduce the pressure on the doors and .that was the excuse they gave me for changing the sheaves. It didn't make sense but so be it. Remember this building has been operating since 2005 so any reference to the balancing reports which are over 4 years old is kind of mute. Just tell us or someone what is needed You should also note that I brought this up in May of 2009 and we are still talking about it. We will be lucky if this get fixed by May 2010 at the rate we are going. Anyone will also tell you that GBA should not be used as a reason things work the way they do. A commissioner should never take the design engineer off the hook but CUH2A loves to use that excuse. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 5:38 PM To: Koob, Stephen H. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIDCOOXBFO) Subject: P2009453 and RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium 553 Steve and Paul, According to BAS I viewed today one damper is 100% open and one is 43.8% closed, and according to GBA report you sent me, one damper is two position and one damper modulates to maintain static pressure setpoint of under one fan failure both dampers should close, howeverI the modulating damper failed to close during the commissioning test, see page 2 of 18, and given action item 597, which isn't attached to this report,the action items start at 600.1 page 52 of 54; do you know where that action item is? Did they recommision this item. if so where is the report? AND if you compare that to the report which states one bypass damper at 36% and one at 14.5% 3" S.P. doesn't make sense to me the two reports conflict. If the damper is truly 2 position then it is either open or closed not at the percentage reports. I think we have a control issue along with other issues, why did they slow the fans down if they weren't delivering enough air, the opposite should have happened, speed the fans up. Steve, did you say they slowed the fans down due to pressure problems opening the doors? Thanks, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease ContrOI and Prevention DeSign Engines-rm Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE MS KAT Atlanta Georgia 30333 . - ml I h' 'l 25ft! 'fn?lli +315?, 3' JUL. Please visil BF fat: ion 3 we and tell us about your recent experiences BFQ This annoy is for internal CDC use only and the re5ults will be used to improve bosiness services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate In our suwey From: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 3:53 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium SC FYI Look who identi?ed the problem and see how it was the commissioners fault but it appears no one adding up things. The damper has nothing to do with losing1 a Fan From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIB a Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium Steve; Here is some info on thefan pair you brought a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week. but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium Steve, I pulled up the commissroning documents from (SBA and looked to see if there were am,I issues during the C): process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most of the reievant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the Ca report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of- the Ca testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols'and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identified in the testing section. {Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 ofVolume 1.) If you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You Will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call it you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman, PE. LEED Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDR lyew?UHEAcom Direct +1 (464} 601-8680 I Cell - {bite} I Fax +1 {404) 815-3107 1201 Peachiree Street. Suite 50 an a, ?t I USA one Emmi-fog New Grit-end All infonnat?on contained in or attached to Ihis email may he privileged. con?dential and protected by disciosure. If you think that you have reoe?rued this oommunication in error. lease notify ?iesender and delete this email. From: Milby, Stephen c. [maiitozscm3@cdc.gov] Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:27 AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Co: Probst, Paul E. m. Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building lvarium 6:42 l_l_S C: Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Steve nan-n..- - Sent horn my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCO Probst, Paul E. (CDWOCO Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 [3.4 1 Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Buildin Vivarium Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks -- Sent from my BiackBeny Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Knob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Fair, Reuben (CD Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. 3 Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIB Noorornid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (CDCKOCOOIGHS) Sent: Fri May 01 08:50:16 2009 Subject: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium Gentlemen . I [cast as us a ears we have an issue that was missed 131101? to Buildingmover. The balancing report for the 2528'?? Exhaust fans Ilbli3li42 U-S-C- identi?ed a shortage of CFM from the design (See attached) The balancer did total the cemented lo and it showed that the fanslibgtag?z U. Ieven though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans were short of their connected loads by ab out 691 CFM so if? you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us ?5569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked CUHZA how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the recurs went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air flow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on GUI-12A part in accepting these deficient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUHZA can provide a CAN full of mone}r Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Browning, Daniel A. (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Sent: - Tuesday. August 07, 2012 1:44 PM To; Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Subject: FW: Vivarium Air Flow Reversal Project - 2009 From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 9:29 PM To: Browning, Daniel A. Henderson, Joseph Subject: Vivarium Air Flow Reversal Project - 2009 E. IMF, 1-H j" E, . F'li'v': P2009453 FW: P2009453 RE: P2009453 and P2009453 and RE: RE: P2009453 Re: P2009453 [b'l 2009453 Safetv Test - 0:0. .. RE: Exhaust Exhaust Fans Safety Test 00f Roof 4" ?l 5 RE: P2009453 RE: P2009453 RE: P2009453 P2009453 SaFetv ?l P2009453 - RE: Door From I Safety Test - Safety-l Test Safety Test Test - 1205 -- Calculations. .. L's-'4 9 ?5 7 FW: Door From Door From shower RE: P2009453 RE: P2009453 FLE: P2009453 P2009453 P2009453 shower staging staging area Directional Airfl. .. Directional Airfl. .. Directional Air?o. .. E. RE: P2009453 Building .. 1. a. RE: P2009453 Meeting Minutes Fw: Building animal RE: P2009453 Meeting Minutes RE: BuildinglEl animal RE: P2009453 Humidifier RE: P2009453 Meeting Minutes L0 Elf 7E: RE: P2009453 P2009453 RE: P2009453 RE: P2009453 P2009453 Meeting Re: 'v'ivariurri 'u'ivarile project Meeting Minutes Humidifier Meeting Minutes Meeting Minutes Minutes project i i 2" 1033 4305-: EBEBI I1. I I Ew: Building Elanimal - P2009453 - P2009453 Eildg FWFP ?12 H906 [0.0 housing anc Hii'ific Mod. 010ng .i .. 0.3.05 RE: P20 P2 ng P2009453 i' a - Mod Hvac Mud .- HWIC-M ibii3?i42 3.0. gt 7 252301: . "i . gig-?53. "42909.15 Fw: P2009453 - P2009453 - Building Re: P2009453 RE: P2009453 REWAB RE: P2009392 odor mie- 42 0333. Building ii. .. Building anc EEIanc Report .1205 Pictures - 202301 lbil? 1:242 2020(0) Ibusy42l. 2523.h; Ibwsy42l 2523.n; Sin- .. . RE: Exhaust Fans RE: Exhaust Fans Re: Exhaust Fans Fw: Exhaust Fans Exhaust Fans 0 I 252ml]; . Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 9:27 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: FW: P2009453 FYI Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-Eii? Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce; Cell: 404-825?532? Fax: email: Please visit BFD Customer Satisfaction Survey: and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our rvev From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 9:16 AM To: Moss, Karen Subject: RE: P2009453 Karen, The original design concept was to have the rooms be positive for putting them into quarantine. However, it is my understanding that ARE doesn't use this procedure. So, negative is certainly the way to go. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOCXBFO) Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 2:59 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) Subject: P2009453 Bill, Do you what the purpose of making cubicles 1 8r 2 off special proceedure room with the option of going positive or negative? They can't seem to get it negative as there is only a 25 CFM air ?ow differential. I would like tojust matte it negative to the proceedure room. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 220-433-3307 Cell: 404-325-6327 Fax: email: Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFD. This survey is for intemel CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our sunry Maths, Chester (cocrocoorosem From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCDOIBFD) Sent: Wednesday. December 30, 2009 7:42 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 Safety Test - IXOS CDC 4406 KB FYI Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 2:48 PM A To: Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. Cc: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCDDIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Safety Test Bil] and Paul, Do you know if we will need to do a failure simulation safety test as was done before the building opened at the end of this work? See attached. Thanks I I 555' 1 5 Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: noses?sac? Cell: 4o4-szs-sez7 Fax: email: Please visit EFO Customer Satisfaction Survey: and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted em ployees are invited to participate in our survey Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Koob. Stephen H. Sent: Wednesday. December 30. 2009 8:31 AM To: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Cc: Walpole. Kenneth K. Prob . . aul E. Subject: RE: P2009453 and RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium Karen There is no control issue since we post commissioned this and ?xed this issue with JCI under the project. We saw after the building was taken over in December 2005 that the maintenance lockout mode was not working and it operated such that the two positioned damper did not shut but went wide open. We had them change it to close the two position damper and use the modulating damper to maintain static but even with one of the fans off the modulating damper went shut and the two position damper shut it could not maintain the static. In other words with both dampers shut the static could not be maintained. Now in my opinion you can throw the balancing report. report away and start over. Just tell us what is needed and we will see that it is done. One thing that you may or may not know is that if you think the flows that you see on the BAS are correct you are badly mistaken. The sensors are not properly installed in the duct work to get an accurate reading and there is no good place to put them with the way the ductwork is configured. The taken a shortridge and traverses the duct every year to try and calibrate the sensors but it has been futile because of the locations. We use these readings for the ALLACG reports. Also I told you they issued a change to reduce the pressure on the doors and that was the excuse they gave me for changing the sheaves. It didn't make sense but so be it. Remember this building has been operating since 2005 so any reference to the balancing reports which are over 4 years old is kind of mute. Just tell us or someone what is needed You should also note that i brought this up in May of 2009 and we are still talking about it. We will be lucky if this get ?xed by May 2010 at the rate we are going. Anyone will also tell you that GBA should not be used as a reason things work the way they do. A commissioner should never take the design engineer off the hook but CUH2A loves to use that excuse. From: Moss. Karen Sent: Tuesday, December 29. 2009 5:38 PM To: Koob Stephen H. Probst. Paul E. Cc: Kenneth K. (coo/ocoo/sro) Subject: P2009453 and RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivariun {.3ng Steve and Paul. According to BAS I viewed today one damper is 100% open and one is 43.8% closed. and according to GBA report you sent me. one damper is two position and one damper modulates to maintain static pressure setpoint of under one fan failure both dampers should close. however. the modulating damper failed to close during the commissioning test. see page 2 of 18. and given action item 59?. which isn't attached to this report,the action items start at 500.1 page 52 of 54; do you know where that action item is? Did they recommision this item. if so where is the report? AND if you compare that to the report which states one bypass damper at 36% and one at 14.5% 3" SP. doesn?t make sense to me the two reports con?ict. If the damper is truly 2 position then it is either open or closed not at the percentage reports. I think we have a control issue along with other issues. why did they slow the fans down it they weren't delivering enough air. the opposite should have happened. speed the fans up. Steve. did you say they slovved the fans down due to pressure problems opening the doors? Thanks. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?oe: rte-assess? Cetl: 404-825-6827 Fax: WEI-4834667 email: Khtoss lt?icdcgov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survev and tell us about your recent expedenoes with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will he used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employEEs are invited to participate in our surveyr From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 3:53 PM To: Moss, Karen . . Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building IL rigid-2 IIC, FYI Look who identi?ed the problem and see how it was the commissioners fault but it appears no one adding up things. The damper has nothing to do with losing a fan From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 5:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. [3:342 Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building tiff Vivarium 5J3. I: new Steve: Here is some info on the fan pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last Week. but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatlev, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ?13? ivarium Git Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from GBA and looked to see if there were am,r issues during the 0: process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most of the relevant information for vour review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the C): report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some ofthe operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the C): testing. The next 13 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action item list with the entry identified in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of Volume if you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source ofthe problem Steve Knob is experiencing. Call ifyou have questions. Bill William T. Freeman, PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDR Direct +1 (404) 001-3330 Cel Fax +1 (404) 315-3107 1201 Peachiree Street, Suite 600 IAtlanta, GA 30361 i USA . one COMPANY BrreliagNmi (ironed All inlorrnalion contained in or altached to This email may he privileged, con?dential and protected by disclosure. If you IhinI-c that you have received this communication in error, lease nutty the sender and delete Inis email. From: Milby, Staphen C. Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:27 AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Cc: Probst, Paul E. . Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building ti: 2U. Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Steve Sent from my Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whalley, Marcus E. To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCKOCOOJBFO) Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. (CD Prohst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 ,2 Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Building?y'iyarium at. 252aih?. Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BlackBeny Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Knob, Stephen H. (CDCIO COOIBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCO Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. 3 (CD Raymond, George (CD Nooromid, Shahab (CDUGCO Elder, Richard (CD Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Fri May 01 03:50:15 2001.1]; Subject Exhaust Fans Building Jivariun 5523's? man-12 men giarc we have an-issue-that was-missed pri'or'to Summer. The balancing report for the Exhaust feiijigatbi.? '5 WI identi?ed a shortage of CF from the design See attached] The balancer did total the connected load and it showed that the fans even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that I were short of their connected loads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 69] connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked CUT-12A how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on CUHZA part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe can provide a CAN ?ll] of money Maths, Chester From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 5:38 PM To: Koob. Stephen H. Probst, Paul E. (GDCIOGOOIBFO) Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. In with Subject: P2009453 and RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivariun" yea-Ema Steve and Paul, According to BAS I viewed today one damper is 100% open and one is 43.8% closed, and according to GBA report you sent me. one damper is two position and one damper modulates to maintain static pressure setpoint of under one fan failure both dampers should close, however, the modulating damper failed to close during the commissioning test, see page 2 of 18, and given action item 59?, which isn't attached to this report,the action items start at 600.1 page 52 of 54; do you know where that action item is? Did they recommision this item, ifso where is the report? AND if you compare that to the report which states one bypass damper at 35% and one at 14.5% 3" SP. doesn't make sense to me the two reports con?ict. if the damper is truly 2 position then it is either open or closed not at the percentage reports. 1 think we have a control issue along with other issues. why did they slow the fans down it theyr weren't delivering enough air, the opposite should have happened, speed the fans up. Steve, did you say they slowed the fans down due to pressure problems opening the doors? Thanks, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1800 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: I Cell: 404-825-6332? Fax: noses-ass? email: KMossl Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFD. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: Koch, Stephen H. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 3:53 PM To: Moss, Karen I Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building 13t42 a "oil-HI FYI Look who identi?ed the problem and see how it was the commissioners fault but it appears no one adding up things. The damper has nothing to do with losing a fan From: Probst, PauI E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Buildin ivariun tetiz USE. Sieve: Here is some info on the fan pair you. brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul 'From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatley,-Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO I Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans BuildingVivarium Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from GBA and looked to see if there were any issues during the Cx process. Fortunately there was a reference and I have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the C1: report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Cx testing. The next 13 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action item list with the entry identi?ed in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 ofVolume 1.) If you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call ifyou have questions. Bill William T. Freeman, PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of Direct +1 (404} 601-3000 Gem I Fax +1 (404} 315-310? 1201 Peachlree Street, Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30301 ONE. COMPANY 132 Bird??ft'h'm' Errand All Information containedin or attached to this email may he privileged. confidential and protected by disctosme. It you think thatyou have received this communication in error, tease notify the sand or and delete this emai. From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOXBFOIJ Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:2? AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William CC: Probst, F'an E. (CDCXUCOOIBF 1153; Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building '35- Vivariun 2022101; Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Sent ?'om my BlackBeny Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Probst, Paul E. Sent: Fri May 01 [19:23:25 2009 I Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans.BuildingVivarium Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BlackBen'y Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Kooh, Stephen H. To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A- CJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. (CD00 COOKBFO): Mistley, Marcus E. Bowen Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (CDCKOCOOKOHS) Sent: Fri May 01 03:50:16 2009 Subject: Exhaust Fans Building ivariur 5-5: pm; Gentlemen It a ears we have an issue that was missedprior to Building mover. The balancing report for the . II i - . ortage of CFM from the design See attached) The balancer did total the co mected lc I . . showed that the fans even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans (bll3l342 ad and it were short of their connected loads by about 691 CF so if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21560 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 17266. It appears that newsheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked GUI-12A how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to he set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on CUHZA part lost some of in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUHZA can provide a CAN full of money Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday. December 29, 2000 4:39 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Howard, William (Bill) Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Campbell. John Michael (Mike) (CDCXOCOOIBFW Subject: RE: P2000453 Safety Test Paul and Bill, I talked to TAB services about assisting with this test. But they were very ?rm that they would not certify the test. just assist in the test. Does the test need to be certi?ed? If so who certi?es? ThanksI Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road ME ME Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: mass-sac? Cell: mews-sear Fax: email: KMossli'?T'cdo. ov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for intemsl CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 12:54 PM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Wigington, Darryl (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Safety Test If at all possible. we need to do this with our in?house BAS techs in conjunction with the TAB personnel to keep this job underthe budget threshold. Upon determination of test scope. we can run it by our people to determine if they feel comfortable with it. Paul Probst BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-235-2560 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Monday, December 23, 2009 10:09 AM To: Howard, William Wigington, Darryl Cc: Probst, Paul E. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Subject: RE: P2009453 Safety Test is this accomplished via a control sequence or do we need to hire a commissioning agent? Karen From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 9:35 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCXOCDOIBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 Safety Test Yes we will. We will need it for Select Agent veri?cation William Howard Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.21T4 678.614.?25? From: Moss, Karen To: Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Nogueira, William P. Sent: Tue Dec 22 14:48:28 2009 Subject: P2009453 Safety Test Bill and Paul, Do you know if we will need to do a failure simulation safety test as was clone before the building opened at the end of this work? See attached. Thanks Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: noses-33o? Cell: 404?325-5327 Fax: 770-433-2557 email: K?gssl @?cggy Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFD. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will he used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEF) - From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 12:28 PM To: Nogueira, William P. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 Blngoof access ?2 From: Nogueira, William P. To: Moss, Karen Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tue Dec. 29 10:11:12 2009 Subject: RE: P2009453 Roof access Good morning Karen, What is your CDC badge number? Paul P., William Paul Nogueira Building 1510 Coordinator ODIDCOOIBFDIFMEO CDC Roybal Campus 1600 Clifton Road MS (F04) Atlanta, GA 30333 (404) 539?1679 Of?ce I Cell pbn6@cdc.gov Please visit BFD Customer Satisfaction Starve! and tell us about your recent experiences will: BFD. This survey is for internal CDC Llse only.r and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 9:41 AM To: Nogueira, William P. Subject: P2009453 Roof access Paul, Can you get me card reader access to the roof where fans are located? Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: wastes-33:3? Cell: 404-625-6327 Fax: emait: KMossl r?icdcyuv Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted are invited lo participate in our survey Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 4:39 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Howard, William (Bill) Walpole, Kenneth (CDCIOCOOIBFO) . Cc: Campbell, Johri Michael (Mike) (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: - RE: P2009453 Safety Test Paul and Bill, I talked to TAB services about assisting with this test. But they were very firm that they would not certifythe test, just assist in the test. Does the test need to be certified? If so who certifies? Thanks, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanicai Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: rroass-ssor Cell: trusses-seer Fax: 170?488-2567 email: Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell usabout your recent experiences with BFC. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will he used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 12:54 PM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Biil) Wigington, Darryl Cc: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Safety Test if at all possible. we need to do this with our in-house BAS techs in conjunction with the TAB personnel to keep this job under the budget threshold. Upon determination of test scope, we can run it by our people to determine if they feel comfortable with it. Paul Probst BFOiFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-235-2560 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 10:09 AM To: Howard, William (Bill) Wigington, Darryl (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Subject: RE: P2009453 Safety Test Is this accomplished via a control sequence or do we need to hire a commissioning agent? Karen From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 9:35 AM To: Moss, Karen Subject: Re: P2009453 Safety Test Yes we will. We will need it for Select Agent verificatiOn William Howard Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 678.614.7257 From: Moss, Karen To: Howardr William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. Cc: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Nogueira. William P. Sent: Tue Dec 22 14:48:28 2009 Subject: P2009453 Safety Test Bill and Paul. Do you know if we will need to do a failure simulation safety test as was done before the building opened at the end of this work? See attached. Thanks ?safety test. pdf>> Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Contro: ano Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1.600 Clifton Road E. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 man a 483-330;" dart-2oz; em all Ratings] fir-cg: gm- Please visit Cgtorner saustagtign ?umy and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be usad to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Maths, Chester (cocrocoorosem From: Nogueirar William P. Sent: Tuesday, Decemberzg. 2009 To: Moss, Karen b? Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOGOOJBFO) Subject: RE: - Roof access Good morning Karen, What is your CDC badge number? Paul P.. {bi '42 I. .s :2 Once Karen ives us her badge number can you approve access to reader number {35:42 it is part of terminal grotfp2 ii3p'42 USE @232th; I I William Paul Nogueira Building 15? El Coordinator ODIOCOOIBFOIFMEO CDC Roybal Campus 1600 Clifton Road N13 Atlanta, GA 30333 (404) 639-1679 Of?ce (573) 6164595 Cell gbn6@cdc.gov Please visit BFQ Customer Satisfaction Survey! and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This su rvey is for internal CDC use only.r and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 9:41 AM To; Nogueira, Willian P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) West: 920095153 . Roof access Paul, Can you get me card reader access to the roof where fans imam" are located? Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: noses-sac? Cell: 404325682? Fax: ??0-488-268? email: I Please visit BFQ Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. 1 This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business sewicas. CDC Federal and contracted employees are Invited tu participate in our survey Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday1 December 28, 2009 12:5? PM To: Moss. Karen Subject: . RE: P2009453 Safety Test - IXDS CDC 173 KB Attachments: placeholder.tmp FYI Paul Probst BFOiFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Office 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285?2560 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDUIBFO) Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 10:09 AM To: Howard, William (Bill) Wigington, Darryl (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDCIOCODXBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Safety Test is this accomplished via a control sequence or do we need to hire a commissioning agent? Karen From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 9:35 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDOZBFOJ Subject: Re: P2009453 Safety Test Yes we will. We will need it for Select Agent verification William Howard Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 878.814.7257 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOXBFU) To: Howard, William (Bill) Probst,.Pau E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Nogueira, William P. Sent: Tue Dec 22 14:48:28 2009 Subject: P2009453 Safety Test Bill and Paul, Do you know if we will need to do a failure simulation safety test as was done before the building opened at the end of this work? See attached. Thanks ?safety Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: title-8254532? Fax: Witt-4884657 email: KMoss Please visit BFO ?gtisfggion Sumey and tell us about your recent experiences with This survey is for intemel CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participale in our survey Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, December 28. 2009 12:54 PM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William {Bill} Wigington, Darryl Cc: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Safety Test If at all possible, we need to do this with our in?house BAS techs in conjunction with the TAB personnel to keep this job under the budget threshold. Upon determination of test scope, we can run it by our people to determine if they feel comfortable with it. Paul Probst BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 10:09 AM To: Howard, William (Bill) Wigington, Darryl Cc: Probst, Paul E. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Subject: RE: P2009453 Safety Test Is this accomplished via a control sequence or do we need to hire a commissioning agent? Karen From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 9:35 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIDCDDIBFD) Subject: Re: P2009453 Safety Test Yes we will. We will need it for Select Agent Veri?cation William Howard Facility Team Leader Office of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 578.614.7257 From: Moss, Karen To: Howard, William Bill) Probst, Paul E. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Cc: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDCIDCOOIBFO): Nogueira, William P. Sent: Tue Dec 22 14:48:28 2009 Subject: P2009453 Safety Test and Paul, Do you know if we will need to do a failure simulation safety test as was done before the building opened at the end of this work? See attached. Thanks ?safety Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Attanta. Georgia 30333 Office: noses-sac? Cell: 404-82 5-632? Fax: email: KMossl t?imiogov Please visit Customer Satisfaction Sunrej and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employeesare invited to participate in our survey Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 10:09 AM To: Howard, William (Bill) Wigington, Darryl (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Safety Test Is this accomplished via a control sequence or do we need to hire a commissioning agent? Karen From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCDDXOHS) Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 9:35 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 Safety Test Yes we will. We will need it for Select Agent veri?cation William Howard Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.21?4 From: Moss, Karen To: Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Nogueira, William P. Sent: Tue Dec 22 14:43:28 2009 Subject: P2009453 Safety Test Bill and Paul, Do you know if we will need to do a failure simulation safety test as was done before the building opened at the end of this work??J See attached. Thanks ?safety Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: noses-33o? Cell: 404?325s32r Fax: noses-eels? email: Please visit BFD Customer Satisfaction Suwey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for inlemal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mattie, Chester From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday. December 22, 2009 2:48 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Safety Test - IXOS CDC 440? KB Bill and Paul, Do you Know if wewill need to do a failure simulation safety test as was done before the building opened at the end of this work? See attached. Thanlts I ATTZIEIBI Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Nil-4880307 Cell: 404-825-632? Fax: Will-400266? email K-Tvtoss {cloggrgoy Please visit BFD Customer ?gti?fgction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Nogueira, William P. mber'1?. 2009 2:07 PM rr?nr?rnr?nmnan Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Paul E. From: Sent: Thursday, Dece To: Cc: Fmd,Ma?aC? Subject: Fw: P2009453 {bjt33142 use. 252aih} HVAC Mod Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device From: Tyler, John To: Nogueira, William P. (CDCXOCOOJBFU) Sent: Thu Dec 1? 13 ?mo Subject: P2009453 (?31:42 2523i? HvAc Mod Paul, I .. -I 252mb: Thanks, John John Tyler, RA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce (mi-433-8133 Phone Mobile ityler@cdc.gov a . ith the architectural items for the project to modify the 2525?th . Do you have any info on the door sweeps that were added to a few of the doors in that area? I would spec the same ones if i knew what they were exactly. Any info would be helpful, but not critical. - .I [3:242 IIC: r? Iin th Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. vivarium -- This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCDOIBFO), Sent: Wednesday. December 16, 2009 3:15 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 - Calculations 23 Mechanical Calculations were found in a binder called 100% Construction Documents basis of design. I would be happy to come down and help you look for 18 3 ring binder, let me know, Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-6812? Fax: email: Please visit BFD Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your resent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Ford, Maria Cristina Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:21 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) ?may? Subject: RE: Door from shower staging area to Ulslc'l ,3 252 Paul, I'm not sure what door this is. Do we have a Moor/room number? Not sure if I have access. If not, I can ask someone from ARE to measure for Us. M. Cristina Ford CDC Buildings and Facilities Office (BFO) Assistant Building Coordinator (BLDG 15/18) 1600 Clifton Road, ins-F04 Atlanta, GA 30333 404-639-1655 Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survev and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: Protest, Paul E. (CDCJOCODJBFO) 'Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2:309 2:15 PM To: Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIUCDDIBFD) Subject: FW: Door fromshower staging area It {bllmidz Cristina: Is this something you can help with? Paul Probst BFOIFaoilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-28 5?2560 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCUOJBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:26 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDUOCOOIEFO) Subject: Door from shower staging area to Paul, I need to know the height and width of this door (installed after design documents) so I can ensure pressurization of space. Can you help? Thanks, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-632? Fax: Wit-488265? email: KMossI@gdc.gpy_ Please visit EEQ Qgsjomer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only.' and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe, Chesmr (CDGIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:15 PM To: FordI Maria Cristina (CDCIOCOOIBFOI Subject: FW: Door from shower staging area to {bii23il42 r: as? Cristina: is this something you can help with? Paul Probst Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, DecembEr 15, 2009 12:25 PM To: Probst, Paul E. I Subject: Door from shower staging area to {Wish-42 Paul. I need to know the height and width of this door {installed after design documents} so I can ensure pressurization of space. Can you help? Thanks. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-532? Fax: 770-455-266? email; KMoss l@cdc.eov Please visit BED Customer SatisfagioLSurveg and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey' is for internal CDC uso only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:26 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOI Subject: Door from shower staging area to {b1[3j:42 r: a 9mm Paul, - I need to know the height and width of this door [installed after design documents] so I can ensure pressurization of space. Can you help? Thanks1 Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta1 Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404?325-6827 Fax; email: KMossi {ok?cgov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survev and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. A A This survey.r is for internal CDC use onlyr and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are Invited to participate in our survey Maths, Chester (CDCIOCODIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, December ?10. 2009 9:21 AM To; Howard, William {Bill} (CDCIOCOO II I a cc: 52b23lhi Campbell. John Michael (Mike) (CDGIOCOOI ogueira, William P- Ford. Maria Cristina (CDCIOCODIBFO) Subject RE: P2009453 Directional Air?ow from Decon phone conversation Yes, make the showerlloclter room negative to remove moisture and odors by reversing air flow and adding supply to staging area. Thanks, Karen Moss Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-525-682? Fax: 770-488-2557 email: KMoss @odc.gov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only.' and [he results Will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCODIDHSJ Sent: Thursday, December it), 2009 8:36 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Probst, Paul E. (coprocooraao); - (CDCKOCOOIOHS) Campbell. John Michael (Mike) Nogueira, William P. Ford, Maria Cristina Subject: RE: P2009453 Directional Airflow from Decon phone conversation Karen, Something else that we touched on was adding a supply drop in the shower anteroom. William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Office of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 678.614.7257 wch3@cdc.gov Please visit the OHS Customer Satisfaction Survev and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. From: Moss} Karen Sent: Wednesday, DecemDEf 09, 2009 4:06 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) my IWUSF 2 2 Cc: Probst, Paul E. (morocco/arc) ociocooron S) - i a Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDCKOCDDIBFDL Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCODIBF Ford, Marla ustina Subject: P2009453 Directional Airflow from Decon phone conversation Bill, The purpose of this e-mail is to con?rm ou I on today. i called you to discuss the request for directional air ?ow from decon roomlibiiB :42 US. lini'o lbll3l-42 U-S-C- I stated that air would not necessarin flow from the i decon room into (?(3142 by exhausting Adding suppiy air to and exhausting air from will not ensure air will ?owifrom decon room into corridor ?3 Air will take the path of?he least resistance which would be fromand not from decon room. A wall would have to be added between nd 5_ ensure the requested directional air flow could be accomplished. We discussed the of the door from corridor it?ll. to the decon room; which is two fold: one it is an emergency exit for personnel from WW and two it allows access for large cages that need to be decon; neither of which scenario happen too often. The original design was to have the decon room neutral. The o_ - 'sion was made to keep the decon room neutral as in the original design intent. ins all a tiohter seal on the door from the decon room; butnot as tig .. - on. type door which has. This will eliminate the necessity for adding a door to separate corridor mentioned to a requested a window in the wall which will replace the door from clean corridor lbll3ll42 to (bll3li42 U-SE- 5 during our walk through with contractors on Tuesday. December 3th. We can further Jscuss this in our next meeting with ARB. Please let me know if any corrections or modi?cations need to be made to my understanding of our phone conversation. Regards, Karen Moss F.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Till?433339? Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: email: Esteem Please visit BFO Customer Sgt??lggigg Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the resuits will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIDCOOIDSHE) Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 8:36 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Paul E. {coolacooirBFox warmer.mam:- cocmceol'OSHE); Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Nogueira, William 3. Ford. Maria Cristina (CDCIOCODIBFD) Subject: RE: P2009453 Directional Airflow from Decon phone conversation Karen, Something else that we touched on was adding a supply drop in the shower anteroom. William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Office of Health and Safety 404639.21 74 6.78.6] 4125? wch3@cac.aov Please visit the OHS Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 4:06 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOO OHS Cc: Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoorsFO), I {cocxcaoyuczvsoh Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Nog uelra, William P. Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIDCDDIBFD) Subject: P2009453 Directional Airflow from Decon phone conversation Bill, The purpose of this e-mai ou' phone ccnversat on today. I called you to discuss the request for directional air flow from decon room into {bli3li42 U-S-C- Mild I stated that ai not necessarily flow from the (bl decon room into t3i142 U-S by exhausting . Adding supply air to and exhausting air comm will not air will flow from decon room into corridor {bit3i Air will take the asistance which would be from (M land not from decon room. A wall would have to be added rnsure the requested directional air ?ow could be accomplished. We discussed the purose of the door from corridor to the decon room; which is two fold: one it is an emergency exit for personnel from and two it allows access for large cages that need to be decon; neither of which scenario happen too often. The original design was to have the decon room neutralkeep the decon room neutral as in the original design intent, ins or seal on the door from the decon roomsubmarine type door whic 1as. This will eliminate necess: for adding a door to separate corridorltliilwli?i2 U-S-C- I I mentioned to you that ARB requested a window in the wall which will replace the door from clean corridor SSBuleto Itbll3l342 U-S tblt3li42 during our walk through with contractors on Tuesday, December 8th. We can further discuss this in our next meeting WI ARB. Please let me know if any corrections or modi?cations need to be made to my understanding of our phone conversation. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Attanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Hausa?339? Cell: 49443254632? Fax.? email: 15511055 I Clcdaguv PleaSe visit Customer Satisfaction Sue); and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services- CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Thursday. December 10, 2009 8: To: Moss, Karen 5362s.?? Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Karenr OHS will decontaminate the Exhaust HEPA ?lter housing, which will include the dampers. The across the Hepa ?lter housings are captured by the BAS. We don?t monitor them at the BSC's. We adjust the fan speed to bring the unit into specs. William Howard CDC Facilitv Team Leader Office of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 678.6l 4.7257 wch3@cdc.aov Please visit the DHS Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, December 09. 2009 5:32 PM a I To: Howard, William (Bill) (coqocoochHS), 5 Probst. Paul E. (cocrocoogasm Subject: P2009453 Genllemen, A few more thoughts as I am writing scope of work to accomplish our task: if we reuse the existing gas tight dampers is there a cleaning procedure to go through? and what about demolition of dirty hepa ?lters. duchvork etc? Certain procedures to follow? I intend to resolve our exhaust fan issue as well. I believe that the existing exhaust fans are undersized to hand the static pressure in the system. I want to calculate the fan static pressure and in order to do this I need to know the pressure drop across the hoods. Who can provide me with the pressure drop information of the hoods in the vivarium including necropsy? Thanks, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M3 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-438-330? Cell: 404-325-532? Fax: email: Wear Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell Us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our surveyr Mathe, Chester From: Moss. Karen Sent: Wednesday. December 09, 2009 5:32 PM To: Howard,Wil1iem (Bill) (CDcrocoor03HE Ins-42 US-C- was Probst Paul Subject: P2009453 Gentlemen, A few more thoughts as I am writing scope of work to accomplish our task: if we reuse the existing gas tight dampers is there a cleaning procedure to go through? and what about demolition of dirtyr hepa ?lters, ductwork etc? Certain procedures to follow? I intend to resolve our exhaust fan issue as well. I believe that the existing exhaust fans are undersized to hand the static pressure in the system. I want to calculate the fan static pressure and in order to do this I need to know the pressure drop across the hoods. Who can provide me with the pressure drop information of the hoods in the vivariurn including necropsy? Thanks. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-025-682? Fax: ?ll-430266? email: Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey: and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This sUrvey is forintemal CDC Use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC. Federal and contracted employees are invited to particlpale in our survey Mather, Chester (cocrocoomsep) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 4:06 PM To: Howard. William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSH Co: Probst Paul E. I cocroromcezro); Campbell, Jenn lvlichael (Mike) icocrocoorsFo); Nogueira, William (cocrococrsFO); Ford, Maria Cristina icocroccoisFol Subject: P2009453 Directional Airflow from Deccn phone conversation Bill, The purpose ofthis e?m our hone conversation today. I called you to discuss the request for directional air?ow from de . . I *3 I stated that air not necessarily ?ow fro decon room into (?Qt-42 ii a, a a by exh. . Adding supply air to libli3 rand exhausting air from I will not ensure air will ?ow from decon room into Air will take the path of the least resistance which would be from and not from decon room. Awall would have to be added between nsure the requested directional airflow could be accomplished. We discussed the - I of the door from corridor to the decon room; which is two fold: one it is an emergency exit for personnel tromand two it allows access for large cages that need to be decon; neither of which scenario happen too often. The original design was to have the decon room neutral. The . - -u to keep the decon room neutral as in the original design intent, Mamet seal on the door from to the decon room.Fllt type door which ?3 3 '42 lhas. This will eliminate the necessity for adding a door to separate corrido . I mentioned to requested a window in the wall which will replace the door from clean corridor tol "(bll during our walk through with contractors on Tuesday, December 8th. We can further discuss this in our next meeting with ARB. Please let me know if any corrections or modi?cations need to be made to my understanding of our phone conversation. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770488-530? Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: email: Klvlossl ?@02ng av Please visit BFO Cgstomer satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFD. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: To: Go: Subject: Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Manda December 2009 11:18 AM (CDCIOIDJNCEZID) Powell, Nathaniel Williams, Allison Nogueira, William P. (CDC I I Probst, Paul E. (PDCIOCOOIBFOJ RE: P2009453 #23531}: HVAC Modi?cation lblt3i-?42 USE. 262aih} We. are going to do The walk flow on SSE. 262mm M. Cristina Ford CDC Buildings and Facilities Office (BFO) Assistant Building Coordinator (BLDG 15/18) 1600 Clifton Rood, Atlanta, GA 30333 404-639-1655 Please visit EFQ Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFD. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: Sent: Monday, December 2009 10:14 AM To: Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCJOCOOJBFW Cc: Powell, Nathaniel (CD Williams, AI isnn Subject: RE: P2009453 HVAC Modi?cation gait? pocm) HE E: ,1 Ms. Ford, What areas are you all wanting to see? From: Ford, Maria Cristina Sent: I?viondaiI December 2009 9:(b'lt33:42 use. Subject: P2009453 232,15?? HVAC Modi?cation 252mm lljil'E: Could you have someone from ARE escon'i myself, and Michael Campbell (BFOJ inarea. we are working on The subject project and will have a conirec?rur present To do a walk fhru. We are meeting on Tamer-now, December Elih, at 9:30am. Thanks for your help. M. Cristina Far-d CDC Buildings and Feeili?es Office (BFO) Assisieni' Building Coordina?ior (BLDG 15/18) 1600 Clif'ran Read, M5-F04 GA 30333 404?639-1655 Please visit BFCI Customer Salislaetian Survey: and tell Us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is [or Internal CDC use only and the results will be used in impreue business services. CDC Federal and contraded employees are inv?ed to participate In our surveyr Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 1:00 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen ?Eif?gj??m Nogueira, ?1 lam . Campbell, eohn Mic'tael (Mike) Laura R. Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Meeting Minutes Karen Thought of something else. I recommend that the supply air ducts have gas tight dampers put on them, just like the rest of the supplyi?exhaust dampers have. If you remove the one sxhasut HEPA housing, you can reuse the two dampers on the unit From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 2:24 PM ate-nu. I To: M035, Karen Howard, William (Bill) as ?2B2allil (coqccroinczveoii Nogueira, William P. (cociocooisr-o); Campbell, John ideheel (Mite) (coo/ocooys - (cociccmincmo); Ford, Maria Cristina (coo/ocooxsFo) Subject: RE: P2009453 Meeting Minutes Karen: Bill Howard has indicated to me that ARB wants sweeps in Procedure Room Doors, which means we can not delete those. In addition, he stated that the door separating Ante Room and Procedure Room needed to have sweep added. please advise if my understanding is not correct - do you remember name of company that did installation of sweeps? Paul Probst BFOiFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-205-2560 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 3104 PM . To: Howard, william (Bill) EEItcoci'ocooloHsi; Probst, Paul E. (coci'ocooisFo); . Nogueira, William P. Campbell, John Michael (Mil-(e) Zambuto, Laura Ft. Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIDCDOIBFU) - Subject: P2000453 Meeljng Minutes Attached are my notes from our meeting. Please let me know if any corrections are additions need to be made. Regards, . File: P2009453 E?nvno Mod. Meeting Minutes 12_2_2000_ptii Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Eli-97 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ??0-483-830? Cell: 404?825-682? Fax: Will-488256? email: KMossl ncdcegv Please visit BFCI Qusjgmer ?aliefactien Survey and tell us about yeur recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 12:56 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Karen . 7 (CDCIOIDINCEZID): Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFOL Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Zambuto, Laura R. Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIDGOOIBFO) RE: P2009453 Meeting Minutes Subject: Paul, you've got it. The sweeps on the door between the procedure room and the anteroom needs a sweep. From: Probst, Paul E. (coqocooxam) Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 2:24 PM To: Moss, Karen (cocrocoojeFO), Howard, William (Bill) Nogueim, William P. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) iamto, tau R. Ford, Maria Cristina Subject: RE: P2009453 Meeting Minutes Karen: Bill Howard has indicated to me that ARB wants sweeps in Procedure Room Doors, which means we can not delete those. in addition, he stated that the door separating Ante Room and Procedure Room needed to have sweep added. please advise if my understanding is not correct. Paul N. - do you remember name of company that did installation of sweeps? Paul Probst BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Office 40445 3 53-0505 Cell: 4 Elli-2852560 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 3:04 PM . To: Howard, William (Bill) {coqocoozonsn Probst, Paul E. (coqocoojasoj (couccmmijzveo); Nogueira, P. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (cocrocooreFO): . o, . Ford, Maria Cristina Subject: 02000453 Meeting Minutes Attached are my notes from our meeting. Please let me know if any corrections are additions need to be made. Regards, File: P2000453 Mod.Meeting Minutes Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1000 Clifton Road NE. MS K-ST Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770?400?630? Cell: 404-025-532? Fax: Wit-4302007 em ail: KMoej?tacdeg? Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with 1 Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCODIOSEP) From: F?robst1 Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 8:39 AM To: moss. ren (coalocooraFoi; Howard. William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) [?nial DCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Subject: RE: P2U09453 Humidi?er Absoluter not. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDCUBFO) Sent: Friday, December 04, mos 2:35 PM To: Howard, William {Bill} Probst. Paul E. (CDCrocooxBFD) Cc: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Subject: Humidi?er The supply valves have humidi?ers on them but we were told they don't work or aren't used. Do I provide humidi?er with this design? Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: TEASE-3307 Cell- Fax: email: Please visit BFO Customer Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFD. This survey is forinternal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Maths, Chester From: Probet, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Saturday, December 05. 2009 8:33 AM To: Knob Ste hen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: mammal housing and procedure room door slots What a question. You could offer a little or a bunch. As a matter of fact, you could get down to describing the threads on the bolts used to mount the fans. Just tell her that you no longer have anything to do with the building, and have her ask me. I gave her all the email correspondence on this issue on Tuesdaythe calculations, determine what the airflow should be, and then contact Goodin for proper sheave size. From: Koch, Stephen H. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 7:36 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Fw: animal housing and procedure room door slots She is after me again - Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Moss, Karen To: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Fri Dec 04 17:05:19 2009 Subject: FW: animal housing and procedure room door slots SteveF What can you tell me about the fan issue atl l? Regards. Karen MOSS RE. E??aihl Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Tamas-sac? Cell; 4mr3254532? Fax: ?estas-sear email: KMossl@cdc.gcv Please visit BFID Customer Satisfaction Survey: and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use cniv and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: Freeman, William Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 9:18 AM To: Hyatt, Ted D. Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Cc: 1lilligington, Darryl Payne, Michael A. Walpole, Kenneth K. 1 mitt-T: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOXBFO) Subject: RE: IE animal housing and procedure room door slots, All, Ted and have talked this issue over and here is my recommendation: Once Research Air company) starts work on the vivarium levels we test a few of the holding rooms and evaluate their performance. If the rooms are very tight we can reduce the offset or increase the slot size. if the rooms are not too tight the airflow offset may be reasonable. Since these would be the ?rst rooms it would be very easy to adjust the work of Research Air if necessary. Bill William T. Freeman, PE, LEED AP Vice President. Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDR i Direct Eeli-+i' Fax +1 (404] 815-310? 1201 Peachtree Street, Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 311361 USA ashtray-nee Gem All iniorrnation contained in or attached to this email may he privileged, con?dential and protected by disclosure. If you think that you have received this communication in errorr lease notify the sender and delete this email. From: Hyatt, Ted D. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 8:11 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. Freeman, William Co: Wigington, Darryl Payne, Michael A. Walpole, Kenneth K. Moss, Karen (CD Subject: FW: El animal housing and procedure room door slots Elill1 See the issue below on airflow through vivarium door slots. Can you let us know if this was accounted for in the design? Or if we might expect balancing issues when TAB starts? ALSO - do you happen to have your HVAC caics available electronically? Preferably on an Excel spreadsheet? Than ks, Ted Hyatt Asst. Dirt, FMEO FSE 404.639.0325? 2?2aih' From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDDIBFD) Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 6:35 PM To: Hyatt, Ted D. Pro-bet, Paul E. Subject: animal housing and procedure room door slots Paul and Ted, 1 was curious as to how the vivari'urn was designed due to my current project at the vivarium area. The FRP doors are specified to be vermin and water proof at top and bottom edges which means tight seal and no undercut. The FRP doors scheduled as H1 and the FRP Door speci?cation speci?es vision kits with modification for "tell tale" slots as shown on A301. Door on drawing A301 details a vision light that is 10? wide by tall and shows 2 the tell tale slot at the top of the window. Detail indicates the slot height to be The air?ow into procedure room is 125 CFM and the air?ow into housing areas is 100 CFM. 10" 1: slot results in velocity of 2400 (125 CFM) and 1920 (100 CFM). This is extremely high velocity resulting in high pressure drop: 2610 A 0.34 In. W.C- 125 CFM. ASHRAE recommended velocity through undercut area of doors to be 200 to maximum of 300 fpm. if pressure drop through the door is excessive the air diffusion to the room maybe seriously unbalanced by opening and closing the door. ASH RAE also has a chart under smoke control and management chapter that shows the force required to open doors due to pressure difference; 0.8 is not even on the chart: 44 in door width at .43 pressure differential requires 30 lb of force; so imagine the force required to open the door at .E delta F. We don?t have shop drawing submittals on the doors here in this of?ce they are at the trailer on site. I would like to review the shop drawing submittal to see what was actually ordered. Velocity through slots this high is very concerning. The vivarium doors atwill be modi?ed to have slots widths at no greater than 300 fpm. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Contra: and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404625682? Fax: email: KMosstifrii-zdcgoy Please visit BFD Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent eXperiences with BFD. This survey ls'ior intemal CDC use only and the rsults will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Koob. Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, December 04. 2009 7:36 PM To: Probst Paul E. Subject: Fw: I animal housing and procedure room door slots She is after me again Sent from my BIackEierry Wireless Handheld From: Moss, Karen To: Knob, Stephen H. Sent: Fri Dec 04 17:05:19 2009 Subject: FW: animal housing and procedure room door slots Steve, - What can you tell me about the fan issue at Regards, LIE I: 262341! Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1800 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 7T0-4BB-33D7 Cell: 404-825-532? Fax: T704BB-2657 email; KJvlossl @cdc.gov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey: and [all Us about your recent experiences with EFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used In improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: Freeman, William Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 9:18 AM To: Hyatt, Ted o. (CDC/occorsFO); Milbv, Stephen c. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Wigington, Darryl Payne, Michael A. Walpole, Kenneth K. Moss, Karen (CD OCOOIBFU) Subject: RE: [El animal housing and procedure room door slots All, Ted and have talked this issue over and here is my recommendation: Once Research Air (TAB compaan starts work on the vivarium levels we test a few of the holding rooms and evaluate their performance. If the rooms are verv tight we can reduce the offset or increase the slot size. If the rooms are not too tight the airflow offset may be reasonable. Since these would be the ?rst rooms it would be very easy to adjust the work of Research Air if necessary. Bill William T. Freeman, PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of Hm I Direct +1 {404} Fax +1 (4041818310? 1201 Peachtree Street, Suite 800 Atlanta, GA 30381 USA DHECBMPANY White Graded All inionnatlon contained in or attad'ied to this email may be priv?eged. con?dential and protected by disclosure. If you think that you have received this communication in error. tease notify the sender and delete this emai. From: Hyatt, Ted D. Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 8:11 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. Freeman, William Co: Wigington, Darryl Payne, Michael A. Walpole, Kenneth K. Moss, Karen BFO) l-Ic-n?esg?-Ejem-HFWEH . . .. anima housing and procedure room door slots Bill. See the issue below on air?ow through vivarium door slots. Can you let us know if this was accounted for in the design? Or if we might expect balancing issues when TAB starts? ALSO - do you happen to have your HVAC calcs available electronically? Preferably on an Excel spreadsheet? Thanks. Ted Hyatt Asst. Dirt, FMEO FSE COTE 404.639.0329 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIDCDUIBFD) Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 6: 35 PM To: Hyatt, Probst, Paul E. Hesi??adfect: nimal housing and procedure room door slots Paul and Ted, mini-12 I was curious as to how the bldg?vivadum was designed due to my current project at : the FRP doors are specified to 'be vermin and water proof at top and bottom edges which means tight seal and no undercut. The FRP doors scheduled as H1 and the FRP Door speci?cation speci?es vision kits with mo i?cation for "tell tale" slots as shown on A301. Door on drawing A301 details a vision light that is tall and shows the tell tale slot at the top of the window. Detail indicat neight to belt-ELI The airflow into procedure room is 125 CFM and the air?ow into housing areas is 100 CFM. islet results in velocity of 2400 (125 CFM) and 1020 (100 CFM). This is extremely high velocity resulting In 9 pressure drop: 2610 A 0.84 in. WC. 125 CFM. ASHRAE recommended velocity through undercut area of doors to be 200 ipm to maximum of 300 fpm. If pressure drop through the door is excessive the air diffusion to the room maybe seriously unbalanced by opening and closing the door. ASHRAE aiso has a chart under smoke control and management chapter that shows the force required to open doors due to pressure difference; 0.8 is not even on the chart: 44 in door width at .43 pressure differential requires 30 lb of force; so imagine the force required to open the door at .8 delta F. We don't have shop gi'gg?dlta?hg submittals on the doors here in this of?ce they are at the trailer on site. I would like to review the shop drawing submittal to see what was actually ordered. Velocity through slots this high is very concerning. The vivariurn doors at Dwill be modified to have slots widths at no greater than 300 fpm. 2 Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: email: Hh-?lossli?cdcgov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survev and tell us about your recent experiences with BFD. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCICIDINCIRD) Sent: Friday. December 04, 2009 3:25 PM To: Probst, Paul E. to . oss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFC Howard William (Bill) I . Nogueira, William P. amp ichael (Mike) Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIOCOOIBFC) Subject: RE: P2009453 Meeting Minutes ??has had some discussions about dates, but we are Waiting on con?rmation from one of the Pie. Can we tentatively set March and then con?rm next week? ThanksI Laura From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 2:24 PM To: Moss Karen Howard, William (Bill) 5?3530?? Ii Nogueira, William P. (coqocoorarop Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Zambuto, Laura R. Ford, Maria Cristina Subject: RE: P2009453 Meeting Minutes Karen: Bill Howard has indicated to me that ARE wants sweeps in Procedure Room Doors, which means .we can not delete those. In addition, he stated that the door separating Ante Room and Procedure Room needed to have sweep added. Bill, please advise if my understanding is not correct. Paul N. - do you remember name of company that did installation of sweeps? Paul Probst BFCIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-539-0505 Cell: 404-235-2550 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIDCOCIBFO) Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 3:04 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocooroHS); Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoorsm) William P. (CDCXOCOOIBFU): Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Zambuto, Laura R. Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIDCOOIBFC) Subjeot: F2009453 Meeting Minutes Attached are my notes from our meeting. Please let me know if any corrections are additions need to be made. Regards, I File: P2009453 Bid HVAC Mod Meeting Minutes 12_2_2009.pdf ea Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Celi: 404?825-5827 Fax: email: Please visit BED ?etisfactien Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFD. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business semioes. CDC Federal and contracted empioyees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 3:18 PM To: Moss, Karen Probst, Paul E. Subject RE: P2009453 Meeting Minutes MCT can handle that scope. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 2:26 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIUCOOIBFU) Cc: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDUDCODIEFD) Subject: RE: P2009453 Meeting Minutes Who buys and installs the sweeps? Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Tim-433330? Cell: 404-325-532? Fax; W0-488-2667 email: Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent eXperiences with BFD. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted em oioyees are invited to participate in our survey From: Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoweFo) Sent: Friday, December 04, zoos 2:24 PM To: Moss, Karen (cocrocooreFo); Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocoorOHsi; (cocrocooroHS); rcoqcaomczveo); Nogueira, William P. (cocrocoweFogl; Campbell, - e) (cooiocooysro); Zamouto, Laura E. Ford, Maria Cristina Subject: RE: P2009453 Meeting Minutes Karen: Bill Howard has indicated to me thatARB wants sweeps in Procedure Room Doors, which means we can not delete those. In addition, he stated that the door separating Ante Room and Procedure Room needed to have sweep added. Bill, please advise if my understanding is not correct. Paul N. - do you remember name of company that did installation of sweeps? Paul Probst BFDiFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 3:04 PM To: Howard, (Bill) Probst, Paul E. {cocrocooraso}; Noguelra, William P. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Zambuto, Laura ForcLr Maria Cristina (CDCIOCODIBFOJ Subject: P2009453 Meeting Minutes Attached are my notes from our meeting. Please let me know if any corrections are additions need to be made. Regards, File: P2009453 Mod Meeting Minutes 12_2_2009.pclf Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: And-525632? .. Fax: Tim-433266? email: Kuossl@cdc.eov Please visit BFQ Quatgmer Satislaollon Survey and ltell us about your recent experiences with This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: . Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: riday, December 04. 2009 2:26 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Campbell. John Michael (Mike) Subject: RE: P2009453 Meeting Minutes Who buys and installs the sweeps? Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: rro-asa-asor Cell: 404-825-532? Fax: 770?488?2657 email: Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences With BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in ciursunreiir From: Probst. Paul E. Sent: Friday;r December 04, 2009 2:24 PM I I TO: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) ill - (cocicciomczveo); Nogueira, William P. (coefocoorsFo); Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (socioecoisso); ZambutofLaura R. Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Meeting Minuta Karen: Bill Howard has indicated to me that ARE wants sweeps in Procedure Room Doors, which means we can not delete those. In addition. he stated that the door separating Ante Room and Procedure Room needed to have sweep added. Bill, please advise if my understanding is not correct Paul N. - do you remember name of companyI that did installation of sweeps? Paul Probst BFCIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404?285-2550 From: Moss, Karen Sent: "thursday, December 03, 2009 3:04 PM I To: Howard, William {Bill} Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. campbeli, John Michael {Mike} Zambuto, Laura R. Ford, Marta Cristina Subject: P2009453 Meeting Minutes 1 Attached are my notes from our meeting. Please let me know if any corrections are additions need to be made. Regards, I File: P2009453 HVAC Mod. Meeting Minutes Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-433-333? Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: 77(1-483-255? email: KMossl?igdosov Please visit BFD lcustomer Satisfactigu Slime! and tell us about your recent experiences with ER). This survey is for internal CDC Use only and the results will be used to improve business services, CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our surtre-?ir Mathe, Chester (QDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday1 December 04, 2009 2:24 PM To: I aren (cocrocooreFo - Howa'ct. William (Bill) "7?25? CDCJOCOOIOSHE): Mailbag Utrir?rg?z Nogueira, tam P- Campbell, John Michael ke) Zambuto, Laura R. Ford. Maria Cristina Subject: RE: P2009453 Meeting Minutes Karen: IE Howard has indicated to me that ARB wants sweeps in Procedure Room Doors, which means we can not delete those. In addition, he stated that the door separating Ante Room and Procedure Room needed to have sweep added. Bill. please advise if my understanding is not correct. Paul N. - do you remember name of company that did installation of sweeps? Paul Probst BFOi?Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-539-0505 Cell: 404235-2560 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 3:04 PM I I I To: Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. (cncrocooisroi; Nogueira, William P. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Zambutu, Laura R. FordJr Maria Cristina (CDCJOCDDIBFD) Subject: P2009453 Meeting Minutes Attached are my notes from our meeting. Please let me know if any corrections are additions need to be made. Regards. [hr File: P2009453 HVAC ModMeeting Minutes 12_2_2009.pdf Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta. Georgia 30333 err?ice: rroaee-ssor Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: rte?433-255? email: ?agel?cdeene Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve bueiness services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our surveyF Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss. Karen Sent: Thursday. December 03, 2009 3:04 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHEM Ibil3r-142USC swam: Probst. Paul E. (cocromrriczzro); Nogueira. William P. Campbell, John ichael (Mike) Zambuto. Laura R. Ford. Maria Cristina (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Meeting Minutes Attached are my notes from our meeting. Please let me know if any corrections are additions need to be made. Regards, ?lF. P2009453 i Mod. .. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404?825?532? Fax: ??0-488-266? email: Please visit BEQ Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell Us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for intemai CDC use only and the results Will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey sun-MIL MEETING MINUTES Center for Disease- Control and Prevention Date: December 2, 2009 Subject: P2009453 5 HVAC Modi?cation ?ll-3W 2525 Luca?nn: [hir3'242 2EEalht Attendees: Bill Howard - OHS Karen Moss - DEMO Paul Probst FMEO OHS more Laura Zambuto com Paul Nogueiraw FMEO Christine Ford FMEO Mike Campbell - CIMO The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the plan of action, schedule and construction feasibility. Discussion: 1. Vertical slot in lieu of horizontal slot is recent-able to OHS and CCID. mus arose 2. Directional air flow from De-Con Room 2'32? into {bll3li42 UIS-C- 3. Ductwork will be installed in interstitial space and slab openings will need to be cored. A structural engineer needs to look at coring new openings. 4. Outage can be late Februaryr or March. would like to minimize downtime to 1 week down time but understands that 2 to 3 weeks is more realistic. Laura to: gct?xed date from IE . Tempered glass has been replaced with Plexiglas at some doors. New glass installed is to be tempered glass. . Largest animals in animal holding would be Rhesus Monkey; quantity 12. weight ?lo 8 kg. 3. ARB needs to be consulted before sweeps can be removed on procedureroorns. 9. Removal of ping pong balls and corridor door removal to be done by Micro Construction Team. Corridor door will be replaced with CMU. 10. All glass in doors that need directional air?ow will be replaced with slotted glass. 1 1. Next meeting to take place is to present the pin shin ARE. 12. Antemom do 3gp}; roots were measured to be 533;? Anteroom glass width was measure to be 0-5 Ci} . 13. Procedure room door undercuts were measure to be ?ght?h Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: F?rolast1 Paul E. Sent: Thursda December 03, 2009 1:02 PM To: (coczommcazm) Cc: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Subject: Re: Vivarium project No problem: Paul Sent from my BIackBerry Wireless Handheld - - To: Pr'obst, Paul E. Sent: Thu Dec 03 12:59:36 2009 Subject: Vivarium project Paul, Laura Zambuto of has had some discussions with her groups and they would like to know if the Vivarium project could be delayed to March? I told- her I was not sure that a start-date had been formally set but that I would check with you. Thanks. lousy-M I ll: woo?n 5. 'D?7arh- lm lo! I ilJziEiZ-tl? USE. 5 252301 Mathe, Chester From: Sent: Thursday. Deoemoer 03. 2009 1:00 PM To: Probet, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Vivarium project Paul, Laura Zambuto of has had some discussions with her groups and they would like to know if the Vivarium project could be delayed to March? I told her I was not sure that a start date had been formally set but that i would check with you. Thanks. Iml 2 5.0. 2E-25ul'll- n. fulfia: Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday. December 02, 2009 8:21 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCO Subject: FW: P2009453 HVAC U-S-C- 252m Animal Holding Doors IXOS one 657 KB Attachments: placeholder.tmp Paul Looking at the attaclunent it is stretching it to sa}r it applies to the doors in my humble opinion From: Ib;rE< USE: 5252mm Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 4:12 PM To: Koob, Stephen H. Subject: Fw: P2009453 HVAC mountains use. 25min; Animal Holding Doors From: Moss, Karen Tu: Howard, William (Bill) (coo/ocoorOHS); "newLise-seem (cocrocool0HS) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Mon Nov 30 15:58:19 2009 Subject: P2009453 anc Moollbli3li42 U-S-C- were i Animal Holding odors . Pat and Bill, The glass in the animal holding doors are {ml-3M: ?2 Per ASHRAE guidelines maximum velocity through an undercut area of door is 300 (see attached chart from ASHRAE Handbook). The slot in the glass would have to be 6" high. Is a slot this tall okay for this area? ls wash down in the corridor to be a concern with this size slot in door? The design documents indicate aslot under all doors at 150 CFM the velocity is 600 fprn. A greater pressure drop than ASHRAE recommends. ASH RAE states "it the pressure drop through door returns is excessive, the air diffusion to the room may be serioust unbalanced by opening or closing doors." Are you having this problem in this area? Also this issue could contribute to current exhaust fans not being capable of exhausting the required air quantity; too much pressure drop means reduced air flow rate. I would also like to verity that reducing the ACH rate from 15 to 10 in animal holding is acceptable. Also, whom can veri orridor to womenimen's shower area has sweep or no sweep, undercut or no undercut? Thanks, Velocitiespdf? Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Celt: 404 325-682? Fax: email: Klvlossl Glade.ng Please visit BFG Customer Satisfaction alley and tell us about your recent experiences with EIFO. This survey Is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey {33:42 I use. comdor door to womenfmen?s shower axee has sweep and no undercut; tins Maths, Chester (cocroccomsee) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday. December 02. 2009 6:(CDCIOCOOIBFO): Probst, Paul E. (CDCHOCOOIBFO) Subject: I 63$ ?Elanimal housing and procedure room door slots Paul and Ted. ?3 I19 262mb: I was curious as to how the [Elvivarium was designed due to my current project at I vivariurn area. The doors are speci?ed to be vermin and water proof at top and bottom edges which means tight seal and no undercut. The FRP doors scheduled as H1 and the FRP Door specification speci?es vi .ilicaticn for ?tell tale" slots as shown on A301. Door on drawing A301 details a vision light that I tall and shows the tell tale slot at the top of the window. Detail indica ?t height to The airflow into procedure room is 125 CFM and the airflow into housing areas is 100 CFM. in slot results in velocity of 2400 {125 (3le and 1920 (100 CFM). This is extremely high velocity resulting in high pressure drop: 2610 A 0.84 in. WC. 125 CFM. ASHRAE recommended velocity through undercut area of doors to be 200 to maximum of 300 fpm. If pressure drop through the door is excessive the air diffusion to the room maybe seriously unbalanced by opening and closing the door. ASHRAE also has a chart under smoke control and management chapter-that shows the force required to open doors due to pressure difference; 0.3 is not even on the chart: 44 in door width at .43 pressure differential requires 30 lb of force; so imagine the force required to open the door at .3 delta P. We don't have shop drawing submittals on the doors here in this of?ce they are at the trailer on site. I would like to review the shop drawing submiltal USE ?2?2alltj [m what was actually ordered. Velocity through slots this high is very concerning. EBEailt. The vivariu'fn doors atDwill be modi?ed to have slots widths at no greater than 300 fpm. Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Hosea-sac? Cell: 404-325-6327 Fax: ??0-458-265? email: KMoss lt?icdcgov Please visit EEQ Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFU. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe. Chester From: NogueiraI William P. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 01. 2009 3:1? PM To: Moss. Karen Fm' Camohell hn Michael (Mike) (C DCJOCOOIBFO Probst. E, [mlg?u ?2E2alhl ilcll-JI ?y?oal Uq'llf'ls25 (CDCIDIDINCEZID "rrl Subject: RE: 19200945332354 -. HVAC Mod. lbll3l}42 252mm Good afternoon all. U.S.C. Just an FYI has been reserved for Karen Moss?s meeting at 0:00am to 10:00am .. F'aul Nogueira Building 15MB Coordinator CDC Rovbel Campus 1600 Clifton Road MS (F04) Atlanta, GA 30333 (404} 630-16?9 Office (6T8) 616?4695 Cell gbn6@cdc.gov Please visit Customer Sat'siagiign ?grveg and tell us about your. recent experiences with BFD. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Mossr Karen (CDCIOCODIBFD) Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 1:06 PM To: Nogueira, William P. CDC I Subject: RE: P2009453 HVAC Mod. Meet in the lobby then? Karen Moss FLE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Ti0v433-830? Cell: 404-825-632? Fax: email: KMossl @cdcgov Please visit Customer 8a l' i urve and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey . From: Nogueira, William P. Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 1:04 PM To: l'rlossr Karen OCDDIBFD) . . attic? $351399: Mod {bill-2 U-S-C- l'll speak to Ed Gomez this ..Shouid be no problem William Paul Nogueira Building 15118 Coordinator CDIDCOOIBFDIFMEO CDC Roybal Campus 1600 Clifton Road MS (F04) Atlanta, GA 30333 (404) 639-1673 Of?ce (67?8) 616-4695 Cell gbn6@cdc.gov Please visit BFG Customer Satisfagjign ?grvey and tell Us about your recent experiences with BFG. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 10:30 AM I I'll'orgNogueira, William P. COOIBFO) I Eta-it? ssah?ece. HVAC Mod. Eli-gm? ?5'0 2525? Paul, Can you reserve a conference room for us? Karen Moss FLE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-532? Fax: Hosea-east email: Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survev and tell us about your recent experlences with BFU. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: William P. (CDCIOCOOHFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 10:29 AM I. I Moss; '3 :42 u.s.c. .. HVAC Mod. - a: December I 93?? ?40:00 AM Eastern Turne (us Canada). Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 0?1, 2009 2:03 PM To: Probst, Paul COOIBFO) . I Subject: RE: 1320094500304; HVAC Mod. Meet in the lobby Paul N. is getting conference room Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officers Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ??0?480-030? Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: Nessa?2557 email: Ellipse] [alcdcaov Please visit BFO Cusmmer Satisfaction vaeg and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 2:00 PM To: Mess, Karen (CDCIU 1. -s subject: Accepted: P2009453 [hi-3:24: HVAC Med. 0101-1393-0- 4giltlhen: Wedne a DecembEr 02, 2000 9:00 AM Eastern ?me (US Canada). ??fe lee. . 2523: [Deg-It .- Maths, Chester (cocrocoorosem From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, December 01. 2009 8:43 AM To: Prob-st, Paul E. mm Subject: FW: P2009453 HVAC Mod 363%; Paul, See below? do you want me to write up scope change? Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-6327 Fax: 770-483-266? email: Please visit 530 Customer Satisfaction Survey: and tell us about your recent experiences with BFCI. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIUCOOIBFU) Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 1:54 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIDCOOKBFD) Cc: Daniels, Chartes E. (cwornommt ,M-m Subject: RE: P2009453 HVAC Mod (iffy-i an .95; eh; Karen 1 The scope change adding the doors will need to be documented and approved by AMT. Hopefully, things will fall into place. . Thank you From: Moss, Karen (CDCIDCODKEIFD) Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 1:45 PM To: Danielsr Charles E. I may? Subject: FW: P2009453 Mo {bitBJr42 gage-i I i: r'h FIE at?: Charles, See below. Can We make this work as one project with MDT doing the Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K?El'r' Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-485-530? Cell: 404?825-682? Fax: 770483-265? email: Kigiossl [Higdceov Please visit Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are to participate in our survey From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, November 3i], 2009 1:42 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOUJBFUJ Subject: RE: P2009453 HVAC Mod (migmz ll c: 9 252mm Karen: I would love to do it as one job. Hopefully, we can make it work with a limit of 351101000. Paul Probst BFOiFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, November 3d, 2009 11:26 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDC) subject: nausea HVAC Medifeifyg i355?; Paul. I hope you had a good holiday. Are you going to open a separate project for the doors? Dr shall we do it as part of this project? Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770433-330? Cell: 4o4-eze-osza Fax: I?m-488466? email: KMossi?edc.eov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFD. This survey is for internal CDC Use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Maths, Chester (cocrocoorosem From: Moss. Karen Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 8:36 AM To: Probst. Paul E. I Subject: FW: P2000453 anc moo Animal Holding Doors Karen Moss E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1800 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770?433?0307 Cell: Fax: email: Kfvtoss I @gdg.ggv Please visit BFO Customer Set'lsiawgrl Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only.r and [he results will be used to improve business servicas. CDC Federal and contracted em pioyees are invited to participate in our survey From: Howard, William (Bill) (coaocooronsl Sent: Tuesdav. December 01, 2009 AM To: ?oss Karen CDC Cc: (cociccio - (CDCIOCDOIDHS) Subject: RE: 02000453 lec Moo ibii3li42 U-S-C- Animal Holding Does Ka ren, Alot is certainly bigger than what we typically see. A slot of that size would require a screen. Air will also in?ltrate around door frames and through undercuts, even with door sweeps. I would think that we should not exceed a gap if at all possible. As far as the ACH issue, let's stay around the 12 mark if we can. William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Office of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 ?78.?l4.7257 wch3@cdc.aav Please visit the OHS Customer Satisfaction Survev and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Honda Hovemtier 30, 2009 4:58 PM To: I. ita?-?il . Howard, William (Bill) (coctocooltms); (coaocooionsp Probst, Paul E. Willi?m P. P2009453 HVAC MOD ?33(33342 U-S-C- 2523 Animal Holding Doors ihl '0 Pat and Bill, The glass in the animal holding doors are For ASHRAE guidelines maximum velocity through an undercut area of door is 300 (see attached chart from ASHRAE Handbook}. The slot in the glass would have to be 6? high. Is a slot this tall okay for this area? is wash down in the corridor to be a concern with this size slot in door? The design documents indicate a 3:54 slot under all doors at 150 CFM the velocity is 600 fpm. A greater pressure drop than ASHRAE recommends. ASH RAE states "if the pressure drop through door returns is excessive, the air diffusion to the room may be seriously unbalanced by opening or closing doors." Are you having this problem in this area? Also this issue could contribute to current exhaust fans not being capable of exhausting the required air quantity; too much pressure drop means reduced air ?ow rate. [would also like to verify that reducing the ACH rate from 15 to 1D in animal holding is acceptable. . (bl . . Also, whom can verify corridor to womenfmen shower area has sweep or no sweep, undercut or no undercut? Thanks, Velocitiespdf e2: Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Tia-483330? Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: ?ll-433466? email: KMoss Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey.r is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey {bl i3 :42 . . DEC corndor door to shower area has sweep and no undercut; this Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From; intern useszee (CDCJOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2000 6:05 AM To: Probat Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Howard, William (Bill) use. 262athl Subject: FW: P2009453 HVAC MOD - Animal Holding Doors CDC 649 KB Guys i don't think we want to drop the air changes. This is an animal area and it is 553%? I think we need to be closer to 12-15 than 10-12 ACH. i' From: Moss, Karen (CDUOCODKBFO) Sent: Monda \lovernber 30, 2009 4:58 PM .mum To: HES: Howard, William (Bill) I coqocooims: Cc: Probat, Paul E. Nonlieira William P. (CDCIOCDDIBFD) Subject: P2009453 HvAr: MOD {Eit3ii42 U-S-C- 2523 Animal Holding Doors mi The glass in the animal holding doors are ibit3ii42 U-S-C- 2 Per ASHRAE guidelines maximum velocity through an undercut area of door is 300 (see attached chart from ASHRAE Handbook). The slot in the glass would have to be 6" high. Is a slot this tall okay for this area? ls wash down in the corridor to be a concern with this size slot in door? The design documents indicate a slot under all doors at 150 CFM the velocity is 600 fpm. A greater pressure drop than ASHRAE recommends. ASH RAE states "If the pressure drop through door returns is excessive, the air diffusion to the room may be serioust unbalanced by opening or closing doors." Are you having this problem in this area? Also this issue could contribute to current exhaust fans not being capable of exhausting the required air quantity; too much pressure drop means reduced air ?ow rate. I would also like to verify that reducing the ACH rate from ?15 to 10 in animal holding is acceptable. Also, whom can verifycorridor to womenimen's shower area has sweep or no sweep, undercut or no undercut? Thanks, .. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: rro-4aa-aaor Cell: 404?325-582? Fax: rte?433-2557 em ail: (diedcg ov Please visit Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey {hi {3 742 . . corridor door to womenfrnen?s shower area has sweep and no undercut; this Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monda November 30, 2009 4:58 PM To: (cocroromcezrm; Howard, William (Bill) ccocrocoorowey- I (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIO No ueira William P. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Subject: P2009453 HVAC MOD (bil3ii42 U53 262301) - Animal Holding Doors - IXOS CDC 6453 KB a Pat and Bill, The glass in the animal holding doors are {33142 Per ASHRAE guidelines maximum velocity through an undercut area of door is 300 {see attached chart from ASHRAE Handbook). The slot in the glass would have to be 6" high. Is a slot this tall okay for this area? ls wash down in the corridorto be a concern with this size slot in door? The design documents indicate slot under all doors at 150 CFM the velocity is 600 fprn. A greater pressure drop than ASHRAE recommends. ASH RAE states "[f'the pressure drop through door returns is excessive, the air dithSion to the room may be seriously unbalanced by opening or closing doors." Are you having this problem in this area? Also this issue could. contribute to current exhaust fans not being capable of exhausting the required air quantity; too much pressure drop means reduced air flow rate. lwould also like to verify that reducing the ACH rate from 15 to 10 in animal holding is acceptable. (b . Also. whom can verifycorndor to womenlmen's shower area has sweep or no sweep. undercut or no undercut? Thanks. I. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K497 Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: rte-433.3307 Cell; 404-825-682? Fax: Nil-4334667 email: KMossir?icdceov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is forinternal CDC use only.r and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey itcorndor door to a shower area has sweep and no undercut; the Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. Sent: Monday. November 30, 2009 1:42 PM To: Moss, Karen I mm; Subject: RE: P2009453 HVAC Mod Ilblt3li43 - 3:51? Karen: I would love to do it as one job. Hopefully, we can make it work with a limit of $110,000. Paul Pronst BFOtFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCDOJBFU) Sent: Monday, November 3E]:r 2009 11:26 AM To: Proust, Paul E. II 1! 03131142 -I Subject P2009453 Mod jam? Paul. A I hope you had a good holiday. Are you going to open a separate project for the doors? Are shall we deltas part of this project? Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Tim-4884330? Cell: 404-325-5327 Fax: 770435-266? email: KMDAS Please visit BFD Customer Satisfaction Synge: and tell us about your recent experiences with EFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are Inwted to participate in ours may Maths. Chester (cocrocoorosapi From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 11:26 AM To: Probst. Paul E. Subject: P2009453 HVAC M?d 262 - Paul, I hope you had a good holiday. Are you going to open a separate project for the doors? Are shall we do it as part of this project? Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: TTU-d?ii-?a?? Cell: 404-825-632? Fax: Will-483466? email: Please visit EFQ Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 10:32 AM To: Moss, Karen {cocrocooraFo); Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOIDINCEZID - toward. mentor: Subject: Fw: P2000453 - .Hvec Mod U-S-C- - FRP Door Sweeps Fro Dim?? To: ww- - we:- Jackson, Eddie Sent: Fri Nov 20 10:12:? I Subject: RE: P2009453 f?ee HVAC Mod - FRP Door Sweeps There is no recommendation in The Guide for sweeps on non-animal room doors. Thanks, Allison From! - '(CDC/ocoowHS) Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 9:15 AM To: Williams, Allison (CD . I Jackson, [b'u'3?c42 Subject: Fw: P2009453 use. 25 HVAC Mod 0:31:42 use. FRP Door Sweeps Please see below. Both animal room doors (leading to (53(31142 nd lab procedure room} have sweeps on the bottom (those are needed). The issue is the door leading to the outer clean corridor from the lab has a sweep but the doors leading to the antieroom from the labs do not. With the up coming changes in air flow design it is important to know how much air is moving where. These sweeps limit the amount of air crossing the doors. Does MALAC require the non- animal rooms doors to have sweeps? Thanks I 3 From: Moss, Karen To: Howard, William (Bill) (coo/coiomczveo) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. (cocrocoomFO) Sent: Fri Nov 20 09:06:10 2009 a Subject: HVAC Mod FRP Door Sweeps Gentlemen. Whom is verifying with MAURO which doors in the vivarium need sweeps? We need to know this ASAP so we can proceed with this project to be done in February. Thanks in advance for your help. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-6182? Fax: email: Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Phillips. Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 10:22 AM To: Probst. Paul I Imi? 42 U5 5252.301: BAS readings From: Prohst, Paul E. (EDCIUCDDIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 :20 AM To: Phillips, Rom nifty? Subject: Fw: 20094535353; ahead-:5- i excel spreadsheets Roman: Can you get airflow readings from Bas for the air values on the attached spreadsheets? This is the data for the Animal Holding area Grey Corridor work. Paul Probst BFOJFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2550 Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDUIBFOJ Tuesday, November 2009 5:10 PM Probst, I DCDO BFO excel spreadsheets sis ExhausLaTr?-Jw . :15 Paul, Attached is spreadsheets per our phone discussion. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta: Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770433?3307 Cell: 404-325-682? Fax: email: {Area '4 Air?ow ?oprbm's-_ Tatar Inn": .42 US Imia- a: US a. 2523.11. I -- . 1:113 Wuhax . Mr: - .- ?1 I. a? Mild-1"le lair H1th . {61(3324 use. g. 262a{_h) b)(3)142 use. 252mm _t0$w Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Mess, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 9:06 AM To: Howard William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE): a licecircniemcezm) Cc: Prebst. Daui E. CDGIOCOOIF Fm Nndueira P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 ?gg?gm an0 Med 35313353? FRP Deer Sweeps Gentlemen, Whom is verifying With MALAC which doors in the Vivarium need sweeps? We need to know [his ASAP so we can proceed with this projectid be done in February. Thanks in advance for your help. Regards, Karen Mess RE. Mechanical Engineer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Will-433430? Cell: 404-325?6327 Fax: Nil-488265? Email: n? Mathe. Chester i From: Probst, Paul E. (cocrocooreFoi Sent: Wednesday, November 18. 2009 7:20 AM Tm Philips- Rom Subject: i excel spreadsheets Roman: Can you get air?ow readings from Bas for the air valves on the attached spreadsheets? This is the data for the Animal Holding area Grey Corridor work. Paul Probst BFDIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Office 404-539-0 505 Cell: 404?235?2560 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDOIBFOJ Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 5:10 PM To: Prebst, Paul E. Subject: 2009453h-mmgz 5 5 z??excel spreadsheets 3? supply_airflow.xls Exhaust_airflow.xls Paul. Attached is spreadsheets per our phone discussion. Karen Moss F.E. Mechanical Engineer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: i Cell: 404?525-532? Fax: email: KMossl @cdcgov E?rBa. - {ijj3}:42 U.S.C. 262a{h} {b){3)142 use. ?252a(h) - {mm-42 use, g, Histariss: .. "Air?ow Totally . . mag- MB war I 36x 5: . aw:- h. .5 .IS. use. 5} 252316; I Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCDOIOSEP) From: MossI Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday. November 17, 2009 5:Subject: 200945 mi! - excel spreadsheets Paul, Attached is spreadsheets per our phone discussion. Karen Moss?PE. Mechanical Engineer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 404-325-682? Fax: email: al?audcgov E?wr?a? - mags; Tgaggtal. gdfg? use. ?2525{h} 2525101; USC. 25 w. a. ?5-13-22 . Dr1i." Exhaust .AirfIW?? n1: Rpum?s; Iii?Ez?iiaL; T868 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:33 AM To: Probst, Paul E. I I 3 .49 Subject: FW: P2009453 - anc Mod {25245; Meeting Minutes PauL I sent to the wrong Christine, did I get her name wrong, I don't see another Christine on the list? Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: WEI-4838307 Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: 770?488-2567 email: KMoslecdcgov --?Driginal Messageem From: Ford, Christine Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:32 AM To: Moss, Karen Subject: Out of Of?ce AutoReplv: P2009453 HVAC Mod (bii3ii4?2 U-S-C- Meeting Minutes i am out of the office, returning Wednesday, November 18. I will respond to your email when i return. Christine Ford CDC NLTN Manager Office ofWorkforce and Career Development Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFCJ) Sent: Tuesday, November 17, ZDOQ 1023??i To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ: mm @2525? Howard, William (Bill) Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Nogueira, William P. Ford. Christine "3 ?42 Subject: P2009453 eiti?r'i?? "5?3 HVAC Mod {25325115} Meeting Minutes [want to thank everyone for theirtime yesterday. Attached are my notes from our meeting. Please review and let me know if you have any corrections or additions to the make. Than}; you I stun. vestiges Hv' "t triad. . Karen Moss FEE. Mechanical Engineer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404325682? Fax: WEI-4832667 email: KMossi. cdcmov ?aw: . 3513' 4:5 . 5 '15 p. "ran "fin - MEETING MINUTES Center forDisease Control and Prevention Date: November 16, 2009 .-. . . 3 :42 .30. Subject: P2009453 BuildingliH HVAC Modi?cation Location: Building Attendees: Bill Howard - OHS lb? Paul Probst FMEO [cue OHS Roman Phillips - BFO Paul Nogueira- FMEO Christine Ford - FMEO The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the issues and the objectives of the above mention project. Discussion: {br3r42 use. . . . . 1. 93.3mm to become grey corridor With an ?owmg into animal holding room and they want the animal holding room to be negative to Procedure Room. 2. Latest report for this area was done in April under project 200757? AHU. Research Air Flow did baseline air ?ow measurements of air. ?ow in the mechanical level. No measurements were done at the diffusers. This baseline test became the required air flow for and the new AHU imam? I after the installatidn- of newAHU. There was no attempt to balance to original design air?owquantities. No exhaust was done on the exhaust side. 3. mention seeing door sweeps at the corridor doors to the procedure rooms which didn?t match the door Speci?cations of the original design which called for undercut. This apparently was done to prevent the escape of small rodents through the door undercut. During the walk down of this area it was noted that door sweeps were also added to the procedure door to animal holding area and to the animal holding area door to However, no sweeps were added to anteroom door to procedure room. 4. Door sweeps were added because MAC requested them. The doors required to have sweeps needs to be verify with 5. The door from clean corridor has been sealed off and is never used. OHS would like a solid wall with no door. ARB approval is needed on possible door removal. 6. According to the most current TELB report necropsy area is positive to adjacent procedure room. mm am? is currently not being used and may have a different function in thefuture. New air?ow design is air in from grey corridor into necropsy anteroom and air into room should be most negative. 7. There was some discussion on whether door work should be done under separate project to keep project under $100,000. 8. Discussed reducing supply air in holding areas to achieve negative pressure since exhaust air flow is constant and fan is already undersized. Discussed the possibility of removing existing exhaust valve, duct and grille in corridor to make path for supply air ductwork to prevent new slab penetrations I Discussed if new stainless steel exposed duct could be routed down corrido to provide clean make up air to the animal holding area. There is limited space to run ductwork in this corridor due to downturn beams, sprinkler pipe, photo cells, etc. Field verification will be required. The necessity of a installing a wall US-C- ?26 Ilblt3) and corridorwas discussed. 9. Secondary entry (adjacent to elevator shaft) shall be positive in respect to clean corridcr U-S-C- 15 Issues have been ed in this area due to ele? ator Shaft. Wish?? shall be positive in respect to rey corridor PEEP: mam: 10. From the viewing glass of secondary entry area 5 [3 E: It appeared that the 262m (in; corridor do or to womenhnen?s shower area has sweep and no undercut; this nee to be veri?ed. ll. DEMO would like baseline T8513. FMEO suggested doing the design and then have TSLB done after the design has been done. 12. in lab areas is very hard to accomplish. OHS does not want contractors in the labs. There was discussion on how accurate T8513 could be due if. done at the mechanical level due to the con?guration of the ductwork and turbulent air?ow. 13. Work would require possible 2. month outage to be done possibly in February. Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) 9 November 16. 2009 8:45 AM Moss, Karen Probst, Paul E. No Leira. Wi liam P. (coalocowaFO); Howard, William (Bill) 252 From: Hour?" sigma Sent: Monday, To: (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Subject: Will meet you there Re: P2009453 Building VAC Modi?cations to From: Moss, Karen To: Probst, Paul E. (CDC/occuowFO); (coo/ocooioHS); Nogueira, William P. (coclocoolsso) I, Sent: Mon Nov 16 08:44:01 2009 sits? -- -- HVAC Modi?cations to {onslaz uses 2522.th lbjl3j:'42 US . Mam:- I will. meet the-"lobbyof I do not have access to this building so some one is going to have to sign me in. Thanks, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Ks? Atlanta, Georgia 30333 OFFICE: Cell: 404-325-682? Fax: Nil-4884567 em From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 11:32 AM Eras Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIB 2523'?? Subject: Plume-1'5? WAC Modi?cations Aging-337?? I When: 252301: Ioer 15, 2009 9:30 AM Eastern Time (US 8: Canada}. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 8:44 ii To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCloccoi'sFolocrocoorOSHE); Noguaira, William (cosiocoollesol Subject: RE: P2009453 Building HVAC Modi?cations to hl3l-?42 re: I will meet you in the lobby of buildin [3:4 I do not have access to this building so some one is going to have to sign me in. Thanks, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M5 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: mil-435-3%? Cell: 404-32 5-6827 Fax: email: From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCODIBFO) Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 11:32 AM To: Moss, Karen - . . Subject: Accepted: P2009453 Building VAC Modi?cations to U-S-C- I When: Honday,mvember 16, 2009 9:30 Mil-10:30 AM a em lrne (US 3: Canada]. 1Where: Building Mathe, Chester {cosiocoorosem From: Sent To: Cc: Subject: ATT06949 The ?rstT&B Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Thursday. November12, 2009 1:59 PM Nooromid. Shahab (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Fair Reuben Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ RETAB Report was sec 516 KB one in January matches the schedule, the second one done in April does not. Do you know where got the required air (3le on the second report? Thanks, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE MS K497 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: rro?ese-esor Cell: 404-325-6827 Fax: email: KMossIr??icdcgov nstruction folder in the project ?lesthese ?les. AH {bit3j:42 U.S.C. I Construction Documents From: Nooromid, Shahab (CDCJOCDOIBFD) Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 1:46 PM To: Moss, Karen (cocrocoorseo) Cc: Fair Reuben (CDCIUCOOJBFO) Subject: RE TAB Report Karen, I ?ust osted rm; engre (5}{3li42 AHU: 2523 Thanks, Shahab From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 1:39 PM To: Noorornid, Shahab Cc: Fair, Reuben (cocrocoorBFm Subject: RETAB Report This doesn't contain any of the exhaust air valves? Was the exhaust not done? Karen Moss RE. Mechanical En gineer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1800 Clifton Road NE. M3 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-6327 Fax: email: From: Nunmmid, Shahah (CDCIDCDDIBFD) Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 11:47 AM To: Moss Karen (CDCIUCOGJBFO) Subject: TAB Report File: TB?pdf 7" Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday. November 00, 2009 3:44 PM To: F'robst1 Paul E. Subject: RE: P2009392 Door Pictures - IXOS CDC 4662 KB h. 086 Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 220-483-830? Cell: 404-325-682? Fax: 220?483-266? email: From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 3:32 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009892 8: File: doors.doc Here's the spec on doors Paul BFOfFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursdav, November 05, 2009 5:25 PM To: Prohst, Paul E. Subject: F2009892 at 0 Paul, . Per our conversation the last page of the report is 30 stars with page 14. Missing boxes from ar Ilblt3lifl2 USC- 262800 WI found on the schedule to serve the cage wash area, ifl couldjust have the sketch that shows what diffusers corresponds to page 25. Thanks for your help! Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-433-330? Cell: ?Milli?525632? Fax: email: Mags 1 Mathe, Chester icocrocooroseei From: Freeman. William sWFreeman@cuh2a.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:47 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Payne, Michael A. Elder. Richard (CDCIOCOOIPGO ilhy, Ste ?ed-2 Crane. .Jon; Meier, lvlark Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building a Ivarium nar- Paul, Can you send the report for those fans (only the fans and not the rooms]? I?ve talked with MK Plastics and they will look at the information but need the report. Thanks. Bill William T. Freeman, PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of WivivEUHEAcorn Direct +1 (404] 601-8680 I Cell lFax +1 [404) 815-310? 1201 Peechtree Street, Suite 600 lAtlanla, GA 30361 IUSA ONE COMPANY Hrs-aiding New Errand All lnionne?on contained in or attached to this email may be privileged. con?dential and protected by disclosure. liyou think met you have received this ceramunica?on in error. lease notify the send er and delete this Email. From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:57 AM To: Crane, Jon; Meier, Mark; Freeman, William Cc: Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Payne, Michael A. Elder, Richard . Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium tilt? K. Q?nni [hr Bill, Mark and Jon, We appreciate the information and summary that you have provided, but as you can see, there are still some questions about these fans. Could you please take a look at Paul's question? It might also be helpful for Bill to give Paul a call so we can get a response to this question ?nalized. Thanks, Steve From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 4:08 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. 'mmeier@cuh2a.com? Cc: Payne, Michael A. Whatle arcus E. Elder, Richard Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium . All: I have reviewed the info a little further. The fan pair that is problematic at this time aw. The fans both run simultaneously, and upon failure of one, the remaining fan shall ramp Up to cover the load. The design for each fan was 21,500 at esp. The submittal tan curve indicates that the fan should be rated for 21.500 at 135" sp. The manufacturer allowed for some additional plenum loss. The test and balance report showed that the tan pulled 16.569 cfrn. which is a discrepancy of 23% from design. The T843 report also shows that actual connected load of exhaust grilles totals 17.250 cfm. This latter amount is the appropriate number to which the fan shall be balanced. Based on the submittal data. it appears that the fan should have more than suf?cient capacity to handle the connected load. However. based on what we are experiencing. that is not happening during fa?ure mode. There could be several reasons. for example: the system is subject to more static pressure than calculated during design. or the installed sheavelbelt combination is not the right setup. At the present time. we are experiencing positive pressure in spaces at failure mode that being held negative during normal operation. The fan is not capable of meeting the 1?,260 cfm. much less the design capacity of 21 .500 cfrn. I believe it would be prudent to have CUH2A contact the manufacturer to review the installed equipment. and determine if this is a simple ?x with adjustments to the sheavelbelt combination. Paul Probst CDC Buildings and Facilities Of?ce Capital Improvements Management Of?ce 4040-639-0505 From: Koob. Stephen H. Sent: Monday. May 18, 2009 ?:29 AM To: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Cc: Milby. Stephen C. Payne. Michael A. Fair, Reuben Probst. Paul E. Whatlev. Marcus E. Bowen. Ken L. Raymond. George Nooromid. Shahab (CDCIOCOOKOHS) Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building 3?11 Paul It now appears that CUH2A is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all right was the reason they accepted the fans as being less than speci?ed. GBA was wrong. The statement in their narrative: "If a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairslibil3ii42 2525101) I. the system will continue to operate under normal operating conditionsthe pair that has a failure will be able to maintain system static pressure?. This is not true for a loss of fan? it is true to even though they do not meetwhat is speci?ed. This was ?rst discovered in 2007 but at that time the two position damper was going wide open on fan failure. During the change we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers closed we could not maintain static with one fan and while reviewing the balancing report the shortage was identified. If these fans would have met the speci?cation requirements this would not be an issue but they were not made to meet the seci?cation requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation of a single fan in regards to Fan and and that is the issue Do we just accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CDC even though it is not what is speci?ed? The bottom line is that this needs to be corrected. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOXB {3142 Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium Steve: Here is some info on than pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, Wiliiam Sent: Friday, Mayr 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Miiby, Stephen C. Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. is} Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building medium-313% 42 seam Steve, 1 pulled up the commissioning documents from BSA and looked to see ifthere were any issues during the C): process. Fortunately there was a reference and i have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the C): report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Ca testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action item list with the entry identi?ed in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of VoIUme If you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Cali if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman. PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDR I Direct +1 {404) 601-8680 I car mi Fax +1 {404) 815-310? 1201 Peachtree Street. Suite 300 lAtlanta, GA 30361 1 USA .. . onscosresm Ruskingfn?m owe- .F-JI information contained in or allached to this email may bepriirileged, con?dential and protected by disclosure. Ifyou think that you have received this communication in error, legging the sender and delete this email. From: Miiby, Stephen C. Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:2? AM To: Whatiey, Marcus E. Meier, Mark, Crane, Jon; Freeman, William CC: Probst, PaUl E. . Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building 42 Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Steve Sent from my BlacltBeny Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Vir?liatley,r Marcus E. To: Milhy, Stephen C. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCFOCOOIBFOJ Sent: Fri May 01 (19:23:35 2t] Subject: Fw: Exhaust ans Building ivarium Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus B. (CD CIOCO Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (CDCXOCODJOHS) Sent: Fri May 01 03:5?:16 200 Subject: Exhaust Fans Buildinivari Gentlemen 252mm It :1 cars we have an issue that was missed prior to Buildingrnover. The balancing report for the. xhaust fans USE. I identi?ed a shortage of CFM from the design See attached) The balancer did total the showed that the fans liblt3li42 even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans were short of their connected loads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 215cc and it was only giving 16569 and We needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked GUI-12A how come these were accepted We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our N+l criteria satisfied because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 31] go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on CUHZA part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe can provide a CAN full of money Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:5? AM To: 'wfreernan@cuh2a.com' Cc: Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Payne, Michael A. Elde lichard Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium Bill, Mark and Jon, We appreciate the information and summary that you have provided, but as you can see, there are still some questions about these fans. Could you please take a look at Paul's question? It might also be helpful for Bill to give Paul a call so we can get a response to this question ?nalized. Thanks, Steve From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 4:08 PM To: Milbv, Stephen C. 'mmeier@cuh2a.com? Cc: Payne, Michael A. Whatl I arcus E. Elder, Richard Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium All: I have reviewed the info a little further. The fan pair that is problematic at this time islibli3ii42 LLB-C. 262aih IThe fans both run simultaneously, and upon failure ofone, the remaining fan shall ramp up to cover the load. The design for each fan was 21,500 at 7" esp. The submittai fan curve indicates that the fan should be rated for 21,500 at 7.35" sp. The manufacturer allowed for some additional plenum loss. The test and balance report showed that the fan pulled 16,589 cfm, which is a discrepancy of 23% from design. The report also shows that actual connected load of exhaust grilles totals 1?,260 cfm. This latter amount is the appropriate number to which the fan shall be balanced. Based on the submittal data, it appears that the fan should have more than suf?cient capacity to handle the connected load. However, based on what we are experiencing, that is not happening during failure mode. There could be several reasons, for example: the system is subject to more static pressure than calculated during design, or the installed sheaveibelt combination is not the right setup. At the present time, we are experiencing positive pressure in spaces at failure mode that being held negative during normal operation. The fan is not capable of meeting the 1?,260 cfm, much less the design capacity of 21 .500 cfm. i believe it would be prudent to have CUH2A contact the manufacturer to review the installed equipment, and determine if this is a simple ?x with adjustments to the sheavelbelt combination. Paul Probst CDC Buildings and Facilities Of?ce Capital Improvements Management Of?ce 4040-6319-0505 From: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 2:29 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Eider, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (coerocoorOHS) Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building 3 VivariUm {3142 USC re?ner. Paul . It now appears that CUH2A is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all right was the reason they accepted the fans as being less than speci?ed. GBA was wrong. The statement in their narrative: "If a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairs haven-4:: a ?J'E'Daiht I the system will continue to operate under normal operating conditions. The operating fan of the pairthat has a failure will be able to maintain system static pressure". This is not true for a loss of term. [t is true for even though they do not meet what is speci?ed. This was ?rst discovered in 200? but at that time the two position damper was going wide open on fan failure. During the Mohange we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers closed we could not maintain static with one fan and while reviewing the balancing report the shortage was identified. If these fans would have met the speci?cation requirements this would not be an issue but they were not made to meet the cification requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation of a single fan in regards to Fans ill?) an and that is the issue Do wejust accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CDC even though it is not what is speci?ed? The bottom line is that this needs to be corrected. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (cocrocoors- gt.? Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium c, 4 5, 202a Steve: Here is some info on the fan pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. ['01 out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatle Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. {bl Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium 42 a 252a Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from GBA and looked to see if there were any issues during the Cx process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the Cat report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Ca testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identi?ed in the testing section. {Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of Volume Ifyou read the sections you will see that GSA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Kooh is experiencing. Call if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman, PE. LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHEA. A Division of HDRI ww?UHZAcom Direct +1 (404) SG?i-S?stii Ce Fax +4 (404) masts? 1261 Peachtree Street. Suite 600 IAtlanta. GA 30361 USA one company Wing?hi? amuse-- All contained in or attached to this email may be privileged. con?dential and prc-tecled by disclosure. If you think that you have reached this communication in error, lease notify the sender and delete this email. From: Milhy, Stephen C. Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:27 AM To: Whatiey, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Cc: Probst, Paul E. I Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Sent from my BlackBen'y Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. To: Milby, Stephen C. Cc: Watley, Marcus E. Probst, Paul E. Sent: Fri Ma}r 01 09:23:25 2009 - ,m Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium Please get with pan] to discuss. Thanks Sent from my Blacchn'y Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Koob, Stephen H. To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCJOCOOIBFOM Payne, Michael A. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Cc: Fair. Reuben (CD Prohst, Paul E. Matley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCOOKBFOM Bowen, Ken L. 3 Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Eider, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Sent: Fri May ill 03:50:16 20D {m {on Subject: Exhaust Fans Building ivariun: Gentlemen It appears we have an issue that was missed prior to Building EIttnnover. The balancing report for thel M35 49 U5 '3 Emil?- Ifans i - - I . ortage of CFM ?orn the design See attached) The baiancer did total the connected load and it showed that the fans even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that tanere short of their connected leads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 69] connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 172 It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. 1 suggest we asked CUH2A how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our criteria satisfied because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally,r 3 go to 2t) when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because the}r lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on CUHZA part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUHZA can provide a CAN ?tll of money Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Elder, Richard Sent: Friday. May 22, 2009 4:38 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Milby, Stephen C. (CDCEOCOOIBFO) Cc: Payne, Michael A. 1 ley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Subject: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium 4: Thanks, Paul. This appears to be a good assessment of the current conditions, the conditions at that time, and a sound recommendation for further possible corrective action. Thank you. Have a great holiday weekend .. Rich Elder From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 4:08 PM To: Stephen C. 'mmeier@cuh2a.com' Cc: Payne, Michael A. (CDCIOCOOI I Whatl I E. Elder, Richard (CDCIOCOOXPGO) Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium All: have reviewed the info a little further. The fan pair that is problematic at this time enamel and W. The fans both run simultaneously, and Upon failure of one, the remaining fan shall ramp up to cover the load. The design for each fan was 21,500 at esp. The submittal fan curve indicates that the fan should be rated for 21,500 at 7.35" sp. The manufacturer allowed for some additional plenum loss. The test and balance report showed that the fan pulled 18.569 cfm. which is a discrepancy of 23% from design. The report also shows that actual connected load of exhaust grilles totals 17,260 cfm- This latter amount is the appropriate number to which the fan shall be balanced. Based on the submittal data, it appears that the fan should have more than suf?cient capacity to handle the connected load. However, based on what we are experiencing, that is not happening during failure mode. There could be several reasons, for example: the system is subject to more static pressure than calculated during design. or the installed sheavefbelt combination is not the right setup. . At the present time. we are experiencing positive pressure in spaces at failure mode that being held negative during normal operation. The fan is not capable of meeting the 17,260 cfm, much less the design capacity of 21 .500 cfm. I believe it would be prudent to have CUH2A contact the manufacturer to review the installed equipment. and determine if this is a simple ?x with adjustments to the sheavefbelt combination. Paul Prob-5t CDC Buildings and Facilities Of?ce Capital Improvements Management Of?ce 4040-6390505 From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:06 PM Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Building if? Vivarium USC mg, To: Probst, Paul E. eemanrg??lgacom'; 'mmeier@cuh2a.corn' i3 Paul, What do you think? I don't like Steve's contention, but we need to address Steve's opinion that this is an E-O issue. i would like to confirm or refute Steve' opinion. Thanks, Steve Sent from my BlaokBerry Wireless Handheld From: Koob, Stephen H. To: Whatley, Marcus E. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E- Sent: Mon May 18 10:06:09 2009 ,2 Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium ufs :4 5 202a I can put a project in but the bottom line is that thishis an error and omission. Who is going to analyze it? From: Whatley, Marcus E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:04 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. hatley, Marcus E. Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Buildithvarium Eh, Steve, How about entering a Project in the AMT for this to be analyzed. Thanks. Marcus E. Whatiey Branch Chief for CCID FMEO Facilities Capital Improvements Management Of?ce Building and Facilities Of?ce Centers for Disease Control 8. Prevention 770 488-2583 voice 7'70 488-2599 fax From: Fair, Reuben Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:57 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Ivarium (3142 4 us aspaim Agree with Steve's assessment. Fon CFM must be corrected to ensure proper containment in case of or loss of one ton. Reuben J. Fair P.E. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-97 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 work: cell: 404-630-BSTB fax: 770-488-266? email: rhf9@cdc.gov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC: use only and the results wiil be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Knob, Stephen H. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 7:29 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nocromid, Shahab Eider, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Icit'" (CDCKOCOOJOHS) Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium i3i42 :42 Paul It now appears that CUHQA is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all right was the reason they accepted the fans as being less than speci?ed. was wrong. The statement in their narrative: ?It a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairslib?rfBi'ilE 5 262mm _ the system will continue to operate under normal operating conditions. The oEeratinE fan of the pair that has a failure will be able to maintain system static pressure". This is not true for a loss of fa It is true to (bit3ir42 us. even though they do not meet what is specified. This was ?rst discovered in 200? but at that time the two position damper was going wide open on fan failure. During the change we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers closed we could not maintain static with one fan and while reviewing the balancing report the shortage was identi?ed. If these fans would have met the speci?cation requirements this would not be an issue but they were not made to meet the speci?cation requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation of a single fan in regards to Fans and and that is the issue Do wejust accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CDC even though it is not what is speci?ed? The bottom line is that this needs to be corrected. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koch, Stephen (CDCIOCOOIBF ibi Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building Eb Vivarium we. Steve: Here is some info on thefan pair you brought ucp a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. I'm out today. Cali tomorrow to discuss. F'aul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milbv, Stephen C. Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBF Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Buildingm. Vivarium so ,2 252mm Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from GBA and looked to see if there were any issues during the Ca process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the Car report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some ofthe operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Ca testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identi?ed in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of Volume lf you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fa as in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman, PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDR munEUHZAcom Direct +1 {404) 6D1-8680 I Cell I Fax +1 (404} 315-310? 1201 Peachtree Street, Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30361 I USA one cos?:va tin-nah; Nae Ground All informalion contained in or a?adted to the em ail may be privileg ed, con?dential and protected by disclosure. If you think that you have rec-shred this communication in error, lease motif)r the sender and delete this email. From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:2? AM To: Whatlev, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO {mm 42 Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building ?33' ivarium see {31 2523th :42 Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Steve Sent from my BiackBen-y Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) deademen To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOFBFO) Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIO Probst, Paul E. Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Buildin Vivarium Please get with pen] to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BiackBen-y Wireless Handheld Original Message Front: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCJOCOOXBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) CC: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIO Bowen, Ken L. (co crocoorerox Raymond, George (encrocooram); Noorontid, Shahab (onctocooreroi; Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Fri May 01 08:50:16 2009 ll; Subject: Exhaust Fans Building 2533*? It a- are we have an issue mmover. The balancing report for identi?ed a shortage of CFM front the design See attached) The balancer did total the connected load and it showed that the fans even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans were short of their connected loads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 11260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked GUI-12A how come these were accepted. We need to for them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our N+l criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.1] when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms Went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air flow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible burl think this was an error on CUHEA part in accepting these de?cient fans un1ess someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUHEA can provide a CAN ?ll] of money Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: F?robst, Paul E. (CDCIOCDOIBFW Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 4:08 PM To: Miiby, Stephen C. 'mmeier@cuh2a.com' Cc: Payne, Michael A. Whatley, Marcus E. Elder. Richard (CDCIOCOOIPGO Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium is; All: I have reviewed the info a little further. The fan pair that is problematic atthis time islibii3li42 11-3-0 2523i? I The fans both run simultaneously, and upon failure of one, the remaining fan shail ramp up to cover the load. The design for each fan was 21,500 at esp. The submittal fan curve indicates that the fan should be rated for 21,500 at 7.35" sp. The manufacturer allowed for some additional plenum loss. The test and balance report showed that the fan pulled 16,569 cfm, which is a discrepancy of 23% from design. The report also shows that actual connected load of exhaust grilles totals 17,260 cfm. This latter amount is the appropriate number to which the fan shall be balanced. Based on the submittal data, it appears that the fan should have more than suf?cient capacity to handle the connected load. However, based on what we are experiencing. that is not happening during failure mode. There could be several reasons, for example: the system is subject to more static pressure than calculated during designI or the installed sheavefbelt combination is not the right setup. At the present time, we are experiencing positive pressure in spaces at failure mode that being held negative during normal operation. The fan is not capable of meeting the 17,250 cfm, much less the design capacity of 21,500 cfm. I believe it would be prudent to have CUHZA contact the manufacturer to review the installed equipment, and determine if this is a simple ?x with adjustments to the sheaveibelt combination. Paul Probst CDC Buildings and Facilities Of?ce Capital Improvements Management Of?ce 4040-6319-0505 From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFUJ Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:06 PM To: Probst, Paul E. 'wfreema 'mmeier@cuh2a.corn? Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans BuildingViverium ,ng Paul, What do you think? 1 don't like Steve's contention, but we need to address Steve's opinion that this is an E-O issue. I would like to confirm or refute Steve' opinion. Than ks, Steve Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Koob, Stephen H. To: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCDOIBFD) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Sent: Mon May 18 10:06:09 2009 in- oils Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium USE I can put a project in but the bottom line is that this is an error and omission. Who is going to analyze it? From: WhatIeY; Marcus E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:04 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCJOCOOIBFD) I Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Eider, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Buildind Vivarium Steve, How about entering a Project in the AMT for this to be analyzed. Thanks. Marcus E. Whatley Branch Chief for CCID 8: FMEO Facilities Capital improvements Management Of?ce Building and Facilities Of?ce Centers for Disease Control 0 Prevention 270 433-2563 voice 770 438-2599 fax From: Fair, Reuben (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:5?r AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Noorcmid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIDCOOIBF Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building 2 IIU) Vivarium '3442 Agree with Steve?s assessment. Fon CFM must be corrected to ensure proper containment in cose of loss of one ton. Reuben J. Fair P.E. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 work: cell; 404-630-6573 fax: 770-488-2657 email: rhf9@cdc.gov Please visit EFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 ?:29 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOJBFD Ra mond, George (cocrocoonsFO); Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard it!) Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Buildin ?1323 Vivarium ib} i3)242 it C. r" Paul It now appears that CU HZA is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all right was the reason they accepted the fans as being less than specified. GBA was wron . The statement in their narrative: I (31-42 U-S-C- 25230? I the system will continue to "If a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairs (bl operate under normal operating conditions. The oeratino static pressure". This is not true for a loss of fan i bv3y42 Ina-Inna:- is speci?ed. of the pair It is true for bat has a is ilure will be able to maintain system rays-M2 even though they do not meet what llQl? . first discovered in 200? but at that time the two position damper was going wide open on fan failure. During the change we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers closed we could not maintain static with one fan and while reviewing the balancing report the shortage was identi?ed. If these fans would have met the speci?cation requirements this would not be an issue but they were not made to meet the seci?cation requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation of a single fan in regards to and that is the issue Do we just accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CDC even though it is not what is specified? The bottom line is that this needs to be corrected. From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCICCDOIBFC) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building 42 l.{ivarium SIEVEI roy3r42 so 262aih) Here is some info on the fan pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Staphen C. Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium r3 {bi {3142 LISC a Glass Steve, I I pulled up the commissioning documents from GBA and looked to see ifthere were any issues during the Ex process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the Cx report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Cx testing. The next 13 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identi?ed in the testing section. [Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 ofVolume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of Volume ifyou read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call-if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman, PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDRI Direct +1 (404) 601-8680 I Cell Fax +1 (404) 315-310? 1201 Feachtree Street, Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30361 I USA ONE CD Ming?he Emerald All iniennation contained in or attached to this email may he privileged. con?dential and protected by disclosure. If you think that you have received this in error, lease notify the sender and delete this email. From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:2? AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Cc: Prohst, Paul E. (CDC/ocoofero Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building a .- l- Vivarium USE Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Sent from my BlackE-en'y Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. COOIBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 Subject: Fw; Exhaust Fans Buildin Vivariu Please get with pant to discuss. Thanks Sent from my Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Knob, Stephen H. To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCIO COOIBFO) Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Noorontid, Shahab (CDCIO Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (CDCJO COOIOHS) Sent: Fri May 01 08:50: [6 200 Subject: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium {if} 4g {a Gentlemen It a ears we have an issue that was missed prior to Buildin .55 urnover. The balancing report for the 2523.?: xhaust fans identi?ed a shortage of CFM from the design See attached) The balancer did tota connec load and it showed that the fans even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fanere short of their connected leads by about 91 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 165 69 and we needed at least 13'260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. i suggest we asked CUHEA how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our N+l criteria satis?ed becauSe of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is mnning because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the roonts'went' positive because they lost some of there exhaust air flow. i guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on CUHZA part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. i will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUHZA can provide a CAN full of money 412 U5 CI 5. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 5:41 PM To: Elder, Richard Paul E. (CDCIUCOOIBFO) Cc: Payne, Michael A. Whatiey, Marcus E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOE Maxwell, James C. I ioziemz Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Buildin Vlvariurr Rich, Thanks, we will review and let you know. Sent from my BlackEierry Wireless Handheld From: Elder, Richard (CDCJOCOOIPGO) To: Milby, Stephen C. Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Cc: Payne, Michael A. Whatley, Marcus E. Maxwell, James C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tue May 19 15:39:33 2009 Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium Steve and Paul: I agree that this probably needs to be checked out. There seem to be various points of view, yet the bottom line appears that the volume of air needs to be improved. Since the problems brought up by Steve Koob might be associated with design. construction, or commissioning, each of which could be constrained by 6005 acceptance of each; and, since these were all under the technical management of Cllv?lO, it seems appropriate that CIMO investigate the problem in order to (1) validate where any responsibility might lie, what corrective actionts} might be made. and (3) participate with DEMO and FMEO in deciding how BFO wants to proceed. lithe investigation comes up with a supportable conclusion that CUHZA, or McCarthy {or one of its subcontractors), or GBA were the cause of the problems, PGO will evaluate the issue and evidence and consult with OGC regarding what action we can take {if any). I Know that no one has a lot of time to read very much extraneous material with all of the workload and e-mails we all get, but I am attaching a document that contains some examples of situations associated with latent defects that I cut and pasted from a number of resources. It may give us some ideas of things to watch for during the investigation of the problems with the exhaust fans. From what i have read about the exhaust fan situation, it seems that we would have a very dif?cult time supporting and Error and Omission claim at this late date. It seems that we would have to establish that there is a Latent Defect (which means we were not and could not have been aware of the defect at the time of acceptance], or that the defect was knowingly and intentionally installed in an attempt to deceive the government and was thereby "fraudulent." Since this equipment has been activer being used for so long, it also seems that there could be other reasons for reduced air?ow. I'm sure "other potential reasons" would be taken into consideration when the investigation is conducted. We will sUpport, to the best of our abilities, whatever the team wants to pursue. Please let me know when and how I can help. Rich Richard G. Elder Lead Contract Specialist Building 5; Facilities Contracts Branch Procurement tit Grants Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2920 Brandywine Rd. Atlanta, GA. 30341 Of?ce Fax: Please tell us about your experience with PGO. Federal employees and on-site contractors, visit the P80 Customer Satisfaction Survey- All others, email This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working with CDC in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey- From: Milt-y, Stephen C. Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 1:31 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Payne, Michael A. Elder, Richard Whatley, Marcus E. Maxwell James C. Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium $545 Paul, Thanks. Because Steve keeps bringing it up, I think we need to take his concern seriously. He has repeatedly said that CUHZA should be responsible for paying for this. have not looked at this in great detail, but it seems that the issue may not be related as much to design, but more to construction, commissioning and acceptance. 11? so, itseems that responsibility might lie with the mechanical sub, commissioning agent, CDC CIMO staff or CDC FMEO staff, and not with CUHEA. All of these folks were involved in either installing or accepting the fans. including Fl?v?lEO who received the commissioning reports. Even if there is an error here, i am not sure that responsibility is compensible or recoverable, especially if CDC concurred with the initial acceptance. It might be easy to dismiss the issue of responsibility, but I think we need to address it and develop an opinion since Steve continues to bring it up. Rich, what do you think? Thanks, Steve Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Probst, Paul E. To: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Tue May 19 10:08:18 2009 . Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Ste VIE: I am not sure how much time has been put into research by Steve Kocb, butl will need some time to form an opinion after gathering the necessary data to serve as basis for same. Paul From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:06 PM To: Probst, Paul E. 'mmeier@cuh2a.com? Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Buildin Vivariurr 5353:; Paul, What do you think? I don't like Steve's contention, but we need to address Steve's opinion that this is an E-O issue. i would like to confirm or refute Steve' opinion. Thanks, Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Whatley, Marcus E. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCODIBFO): Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromld, Shahab Eider, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Sent: Mon May 18 10:06:09 2009 Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building EIVivarium Mi I can put a project in but the bottom ?ne is that this is an error and omission. Who is going to analyze it? From: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCODXBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:04 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) - Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Noorornid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. (CC Marcus E. Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivariurn r342 Steve, How about entering a Project in the AMT for this to be analyzed Thanks. Marcus E. Whatley Branch Chief for CCID S. Fl'leO Facilities Capital Improvements Management Of?ce Building and Facilities Of?ce Centers for Disease Control 8 Prevention 7'70 488-2563 voice T170 488-2599 fax From: Fair, Reuben (CDCKOCDOIBFD) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:5? PM To: Koob, Stephen H. (cocxocoomFO); Probst, Paul E. Ce: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahah Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ['33 I [til-[3} i: Vivarium ?5 *4 282301] Agree with Steve's assessment. Fon CFM must be correcied to ensure proper conioinmenl in case of a loss of one ion. Reuben J. Fair P.E. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 work: 770-488-258? cell: 404-630-6578 fax: 7?0-488?2667 email: rhf9@cdc.oov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 ?:29 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIDCOOIOHS) (m lb) Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building tit} Vivariurr Paul It now appears that CUHZA is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all right was the reason they accepted the fans as being less than speci?ed. GBA was wrong. The statement in their narrative: ?If a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairsthi the system will continue to operate under normal operating conditions. The operating fan of the pair that has a failure will be able to maintain system static pressure?. This is not true for a loss of fanm It is true foeven though they do not meet what is speci?ed. This was ?rst discovered in 200? but at that time the two position damper was going wide open on fan failure. During the hange we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers closed we could not maintain static with one fan and while reviewing the balancing report the shortage was identi?ed. it these fans would have met the speci?cation requirements this would not be an issue but they were not made to meet the seci?cation requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation of a single fan in regards to Fans annd that is the issue Do we just accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CD0 even though it is not what is speci?ed? The bottom line is that this needs to be corrected. From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCDOIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (cociocooxs 333,342 Vivarium 3 Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building Steve: Here is some info on an pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBF {bi Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium 231 4 4 .5 Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from GBA and looked to see if there were any issues during the CK process. Fortunater there was a reference and I have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the C): report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Cat testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry: identified in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of?v?olume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 ofVolume 1.) If vou read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in qdestion. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source ofthe problem Steve Knob is experiencing. Call if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman, PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA. A Division of HDR invw?UHZAeorn Direct +1 (404} 601-3680 Cel Fax +1 (404} 315-310? 1201 Peachiree Streetr Suite 600 I Atlanta. GA 30361 USA . one cement}: HR All inionnaiien contained in orsttaehed to This email may be p?viteged, con?dante! and protected by disclosure. It you think that you have received this communication in error. lease notify the sender and delete Ihis email. From: Milbv, Stephen C. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:27 AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Cc: Probst, Paul E. I. Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium Paui and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Sent. from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. (cocroeoorBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. (CD croco were) Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Probst, Paul B. (CD CIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans BuildingVivarium r? Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks Sent from my Blacchn'y Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Knob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. (CD Payne, Michael A. Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. 000003170); Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard (CD Howard= William (Bill) (CDCKOCOOIOHS) Sent: Fri May 01 03:50:16 200 Subject: Exhaust Fans Buildin Vivarium Gentlemen . rename see It appears we have an ISSUE that was missed prior to Building turnover. The balancmg report for the xha-ust fatness? Wide-untied a shortage of CF from the design See attached) The halancer did total the connected load and it showed that the fanmven though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fanwere short of their connected loads by about 691 CF so if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been Changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked GUI-12A how come these were accepted. We need to fix them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe GUI-12A can provide a CAN full of money Mathe, Chester From: Eider, Richard Sent: Tuesday. May 19, 2009 3:40 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Payne, Michael A. Whaliey, Marcus E. Maxwell, James C. (CDCIOCOOIBFE I I Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium -- IXOS CDC 169 KB Attachments: placeholder.tmp Steve and Paul: I agree that this probably needs to be checked out. There seem to be various points of view, yet the bottom line appears that the volume of air needs to be improved. Since the problems brought up by Steve Koob might be associated with design, construction, or commissioning. each of which could be constrained by CDC's acceptance of each; and, since these were all under the technical management of CIMO. it seems appropriate that CIMO investigate the problem in order to validate where any responsibility might lie, (2) what corrective actionts) might be made, and (3) participate with DEMO and FMEO in deciding how BFO wants to proceed. It the investigation comes up with a supportable conclusion that CUHZA, or McCarthy {or one of its subcontractors), or GBA were the cause of the problems, PGO will evaluate the issue and evidence and consult with 060 regarding what action we can take (ifany). I know that no one has a lot of time to read very much extraneous material with all of the workload and e-mails we all get, but I am attaching a document that contains some examples of situations associated with latent detects that I cut and pasted from a number of resources. It may give us some ideas of things to watch for during the investigation of the problems with the exhaust fans. From what I have read about the exhaust fan situation, it seems that we would have a very dif?cult time supporting and Error and Omission claim at this late date. It seems that we would have to establish that there is a Latent Defect {which means we were not and could not have been aware of the defect at the time of acceptance), or that the defect was knowingly and intentionally installed in an attempt to deceive the government and was thereby "fraudulent." Since this equipment has been actively being used for so long, it also seems that there could be other reasons for reduced air?ow. l'm sure "other potential reasons" would be taken into consideration when the investigation is conducted. We will support, to the best of our abilities. whatever the team wants to pursue. Please let me know when and howl can help. Rich Richard C. Elder Lead Contract Specialist Building 8. Facilities Conlracts Branch Procurement 8: Grants Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevenlion 292i] Brandywine Rd, Attanta, GA 3D34i O?tce Fax: T7?d??~284? E-Mail: Please tell us about your experience with PEG. Federal employees and on-site contractors, visit the P60 Costomer Satisfaction Survey. All others. email This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working with CDC in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey. From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 1:31 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFO): Payne, Michael A. Elder, Richard Whatley, Marcus E. Maxw ames C. I KOCOOJBFO) Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium Paul, Thanks. Because Steve keeps bringing it up, I think we need to take his concern seriously. He has repeatedly said that 1 CUHZA should be responsible for paying for this. I have not looked at this in great detail, but it seems that the issue may not be related as much to design, but more to construction, commissioning and acceptance. If so, itseems that responsibility might lie with the mechanical sub, Civic, commissioning agent, CDC CIMO staff or CDC FMEO staff, and not with CUHZA. All of these folks were involved in either installing or accepting the fans, including FMEO who received the commissioning reports. Even if there is an error here, i am not sure that responsibility is compensible or recoverable, especially if CDC concurred with the initial acceptance. It might be easy to dismiss the issue of responsibility, but I think we need to address it and develop an opinion since Steve continues to bring it up. Rich. what do you think? Thanks, Steve Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Probst, Paul E. To: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Tue May 19 10:08:18 2009 I lg}:Subject. RE. Exhaust Fans Building U330 Li, 252st Steve: lam not sure how much time has been put into research by Steve Koob. but I will need some time to form an opinion after gathering the necessary data to serve as basis for same. Paul From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Monday, May 13, 2009 3:06 PM To: F'robst, Paul E. ?mmeier@cuh2a.com' Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium {3142 Paul, What do you think? I don't like Steve's contention, but we need to address Steve's opinion that this is an EC issue. I would like to con?rm or refute Steve' opinion. Th a nks, Steve Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Koob, Stephen H. To: Whatley, Marcus E. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard (coclocooipcoy Howard, William (conocoomHS); Daniels, Charles E. (coo/ocooxsFO); Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Sent: Mon May 18 10:06:09 2009 {m Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans BuildingVivan?um {3142 US .Q can put a project in but the bottom line is that this is an error and omission. Who is going to analyze it? From: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIDCODIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:04 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Cc: Stephen c. {CDC/ocoorsFO); Payne, Michael A. (coo/ocoorsFO); Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoorBFO); Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. I Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Buildinivarium ?33 (3)42 Ll Steve, How about entering a Project in the AMT for this to be analyzed. Thanks. Marcus E. Whatley Branch Chief for CCID 8i FMEO Facilities Capital Improvements Management Of?ce Building and Facilities Of?ce Centers for Disease Control a Prevention 770 488?2563 voice 770 438-2599 tax From: Fair, Reuben Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:5? AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. {m Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium C, . . 9??a Agree with Steve?s ossessment. Fen CFM must be corrected to ensure proper containment in case of a loss of one ton. Reuben J. Fair P.E. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 work: cell: 404-630-6578 fax: 770-488-2667 email: rhf9@cdc.gov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 ?:29 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) I Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building'v?ivariu Paul It now appears that CUHEA is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all right was the reason they accepted the fans as being less than speci?ed. GBA was wrong. The statement in their narrative: ?It a single fan failure occurs to one of the i r? 839%th he system will continue to operate under normal operating conditions. The oeratin fan of the pair that has a failure will be able to maintain system static pressure?. This is not true for a loss of fan It is true fven though they do not meet what is speci?ed. This was ?rst discovered in 200? but at that time the two position damper was going wide open on fan failure. During the hange we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers closed we could not maintain static with one fan and while reviewing the balancing report the shortage was identi?ed. If these fans would have met the speci?cation requirements this would not be an issue but they were not made to meet the seci?cation requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation of a single fan in regards to Fans Ll. nd that is the issue Do we just accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CDC even though it is not what is speci?ed? The bottom line is that this needs to be corrected. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBF Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium Steve: Here is some info on th lbll3li42 fan pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week. but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. From: Freeman, William I Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOIBF Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from- GBA and looked to see if there were any issues during the CK process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most of the relevant information for your review and Paul evaluation. There are actually three different parts ofthe Cx report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result ofthe Cit testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identified in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 . ofVolume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 ofVolume if you read the sections you will see that GBA Was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may he the source ofthe problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman. PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHEA, A Division of HDR Iw Direct (404} emesao I Cell +1 ibii?l lFax +1 (404} 315-310? 1201 Peachtree Street, Suite 600 an a, 61 I use . one COMPANY HR All information oontained l-"l o'attaohee? to this email may be atiu?leged. con?dential and protected by disclosure. It you think that you have received this communication in error, lease notify the sender and delete this email. From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOORBFO) Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:27 AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Co: Prohst, Paul E. Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building iirarium Paul and Michael, Lets talk about this next week. Steve Sent from my BlackBeI-ry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) To: Milhjr, Stephen C. (CDCIDCOOIBFOJ Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Probsg'Paui E. Sent: Fri May [it 09:23:25 2009 Subject: Fw: Exhaust ans Building 3 Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BiackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Kooh, Stephen H. (CDCIO COOIBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Ce: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (B ill) Sent: Fri May {ll 08:50:16 200 . Subjeet: Exhaust Fans Building Vivari Gentlemen In. It appears we have an issue that was prior to Building turnover. The balancing report for the lbilaiggallii ?xhaust fans Wenti?ed a shortage of CFM from the design See attached) The halancer did total the connected load and it showed that the fanseven though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fansere short of their connected leads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked CUHZA how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of [he Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our N+l criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set tip to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on GUI-12A part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe GUI-12A can provide a CAN ?ll] of money Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 20091:31 PM To: Probst, Paui E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Payne, Michael A. Elder, Richard Whatle Marcus Maxwell, James C. (CDGIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building - Vivarium Us 262a mi Paul, Thanks. Because Steve keeps bringing it up, I think we need to take his concern seriously- He has repeatedly said that CUHZA should be responsible for paying for this. have not looked at this in great detail, but it seems that the issue may not be related as mUCh to design, but more to construction, commissioning and acceptance. If so, it seems that responsibility might lie with the mechanical sub, Civic, commissioning agent, CDC CIMO staff or CDC FMEO staff, and not with CUHZA. All of these folks were involved in either installing or accepting the fans, including FMEO who received the commissioning reports. Even if there is an error here, I am not sure that responsibility is compensible or recoverable. especially if CDC concurred with the initial acceptance. It might be easy to dismiss the issue of responsibility, but I think we need to address it and deveiop an opinion since Steve continues to bring it up. Rich, what do you think? Thanks, Steve Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: ii'robst,r Paul E. To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Tue May 19 10:08:18 2009 {bi {bi Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Buildin 5,32] Vivarium Steve: A I am not sure how much time has been put into research by Steve Koob, but I will need some time to form an opinion after gathering the necessary data to serve as basis for same. Paul From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:06 PM To: Probst, Paul E. ?mmeier@cuh2a.com' Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium 42 Paul, What do you think? I don't like Steve?s contention, but we need to address Steve's opinion that this is an E-O issue. I would like to con?rm or refute Steve? opinion. Thanks, Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIDCDOJBFD) To: Whatiey, Marcus E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Milbv, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. (CDCEOCCOXBFO) Sent: Mon May 18 10:06:09 2009 {Di ibi Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium [1'2 I can put a project in but the bottom line is that this is an error and omission. Who is going to analyze it? From: Whatiey, Marcus E. (CDCIOCDOIBFD) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:04 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) - Cc: Milbv, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFO): Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. IDCOOIB m) hatlev, Marcus E. Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium 4.2 Steve, How about entering a Project in the AMT for this to be analyzed. Thanks. Marcus E. Whatley Branch Chief for CCID 8. FMEO Facilities Capital Improvements Management Of?ce Building and Facilities Of?ce Centers for Disease Control 8. Prevention 7?70 488-2583 voice T70 488-2599 fax From: Fair, Reuben Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:5? AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Probstt, Paul E. Cc: my, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Whatlev, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Rictard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. $1 . i4: Vivarium :4 Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building 5 .5 2623 Agree with Steve's ossessment. Fon CFM must be corrected to ensure proper containment in case of 0 loss of one ton. Reuben J. Fair P.E. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1800 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 work: 770-488-258? cell: 404-630-5573 fax: 77'0-483-266? email: rhf9@cdc.gov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 7'29 AM To: Probst, Paul E. . Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromicl, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium {3142 SE Paul It now appears that CUHEA is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all right was the reason they accepted the fans as being less than speci?ed. BSA was wrong. The statement in their narrative: ?if a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairsii'bll3i142 USC. 252501) I. the system Will to operate under normal operating conditions. The operating fan of the pair lure will be able to maintain system static pressure?. This is nottrue for a loss It is true for 2e2??m; even though they do not meet what is speci?ed. This was ?rst discovered in 200? but at that time the two position damper was going wide open on fan failure. During the change we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers closed we could not maintain static with one fan. and while reviewing the balancing report the shortage was identi?ed. If these fans would have met the speci?cation requirements this would not be an issue but they were not mad the speci?cation requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation of a single fan in regards to hi '3 amnd that is the issue Do we just accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CDC even though it is not what is speci?ed? The bottom line is that this needs to be corrected. (uy3t42 From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDC/ocoors my WEIFIUITI Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Building {3142 - mom?l: Steve; Here is some info on the an pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon I Cc: Probst, Paul E. (coorocoorero is I Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium l3] 4 Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from SBA and looked to see if there were any issues during the C): process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the (I): report attached- Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Cu testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identified in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 oiVolume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of Volume 1.) If you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call it you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman. PE. LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDFU u_nnw.CUH2A.com Direct +1 (404] 601-8680 I Cell ?ibit?i lFar +1 (404)815-1310? 1201 Peachtree Street, Suite 60 61 USA I ONE COMPANY I'm I sent-?aw Gen-ta All information contained in or attached to this email may be privileged. con?dential and protected by disclosure. If you think that you have received this communication in error, lease notify the sender and delete this email. From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:27? AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Co: Probst, Paul E. (pirate: "Vivarium Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building 5152;?? Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Sent ?our my BlackB erry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus B. (CD CIOCODIBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCKOCOOFBFO) I Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 {p {by Vivarium Subject: w: Exhaust Fans Building (Sag; Please get with to discuss. Thanks Sent ?-om my BlackBert}! Wireless Handheld OriginalMessage From: Koob, Stephen H. To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCKOCOOJBFO) Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L- Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William Sent: Fri May 01 08:50:16 zoo 4 Subject: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium Ill202% It have "an 'iss'astharwas"'niis'seti turnover. The balancing report for the I: Exhaust- fahisr Ii? . 'h Itbitalzatz U.S.C. a 2 Iidenti?ed a shortage of CFM host the design See attached) The balancer did total the connected load and it showed that the {:42 U. leven though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans were short of their connected loads by about 691 (2th so if you lose one fan you are short 69] connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both ofthese fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least H.260. it appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because the),r lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on CUHZA part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUHEA can provide a CAN ?ll of money Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (coolocoorsFO) Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 10:00 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. ,33342 Subject. RE. Exhaust Fans Budding :val?lurn :1 236; Jim Steve: I am not sure how much time has been put into research by Steve Koob, but I will need some time to form an opinion after gathering the necessary data to serve as basis for same. Paul From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCICJCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:06 PM To: Prohst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO 'wfreeman ?lcuhz .com?; 'mmeier@cuh2a.com' 42 Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Building Warium 42 Paul, What do you think? I don't like Steve's contention, but we need to address Steve's opinion that this is an E-O issue. I would like to con?rm or refute Steve? opinion. Than ks. Steve Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Whatley, Marcus E. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. (CDCXOCOOJBFU) Sent: Mon May 18 10:06:09 2009 m} Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium SEE: I can put a project in but the bottom line is that this is an error and omission. Who is going to analyze it? From: Whatley, Marcus E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:04 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. (CDC hatley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium (3142 Steve, How about entering a Project in the AMT for this to be analyzed. Thanks. Marcus E. Whatley Branch Chief for com FMEO Faci?ties Capital improvements Management Of?ce Building and Facilities Of?ce Centers for Disease Control Prevention 7?70 488-2563 voice 770 4882599 fax From: Fair, Reuben (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:57 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. rm ivarium Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Buildin 13.1345 Agree with Steve?s assessment. Fon CFM must be corrected to ensure proper contoinmeni in cose of 0 loss of one ton. Reuben J. Fair P.E. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE- MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 work: Wit-4884587 cell: 404-630-65?8 fax: 77?0?488-266? email: rhf9@cdc.gov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell Us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Monday, May 1.8, 2009 7:29 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Sha - - Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (coorocoozoea itSubject: RE: Exhaust Fans Bu1 d1n42 Vivarium ?ll-ft Paul It now appears that CUHZA is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all rightwas the reason they accepted the fans as being less than speci?ed. rative: ?if a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairs {bu-33:42 U-S-C- 2523th the system will continue to operate under normal operating conditions. The .. 1 . in ofthe pair 3 ,42 ure will be able to maintain system static pressure". This is not true for a loss of fan W334 it is true for a 98:, even though they do not meet what is speci?ed. A change we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers ose we could not maintain static with one fan and while reviewing the balancing report the shortage was identi?ed. If these fans would have met the specification requirements this would not be an issue but they were not made i?cation requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation of a single fan in regards to Fans? Wand that is the issue Do we just accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CDC even though it is not what is speci?ed? The bottom line is that this needs to be corrected. ?rst discovered in 2007 but at that time the two position damper Was going wide open on fan failure. During the From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOZB {Elm Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans BuildingVivariumLE? 6 P?i?af Steve: Here is some info on the 'fan pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week. but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milbv, Stephen C. Whatlev, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFW Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium {31342 :42 SB 5 2623i Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from GBA and looked to see if there were anvr issues during the 0: process. Fortunater there was a reference and I have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the Ck report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result ofthe Cx testing. The next 13 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identified in the testing section. {Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 ofVolume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 ofVolume 1.) Wm read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call if have questions. Bill William T. Freeman. PE, LEED AP Vice President. Engineering Principal CUHZA. A Division of HDR Direct +1 (404) 601-8630 I Call 1m? Fax +1 (404) 315-310? 120i Peachtree Street, Suite 600 [Atlanta GA 30361 USA Sissdemen sesatn; an . - . ONE CDMPANY Em Bare-Hag Nari Glitterati Alt information contained in or aliached to this email may be privileged. con?dential and protected by disclosme. if you think that you have received this communication in error, lease notify the sender and delete this email. From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:2? PM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman!f William Cc: Probst, Paul E. tn} Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building ivariurn ?33 43 USC nr-nn Paul and Michael, Let?s talk about this next week. Steve nrurn? Sent from my BiackBerty Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCOOIEFO) To: Milby, Stephen c. (enctocooiBFO) Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCKO Frobst, Paul E. Sent: Fri May 01 09 :23 125 2009 {bi Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Buildin ii? Vivarium Eligig 5 262a Please get with pen] to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BlackBerty Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Koch, Stephen H. (CDCJOCOOFBFO) To: Miiby, Stephen C. (CDCJOCO Payne, Michael A. (CDCIOCO Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatiey, Marcus E. (CD Bowen, Ken L. (CD Raymond, George (CD Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Fri May [it 08:50:16 2009 i {m Subject: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium 42 i3 Its. a ears we--have?an?--issnc that was Ini'ssed'prior to? we att (ii3i-42 identi?ed a sh rtage of (3th horn the design See attached) The balancer did total the cor {bji3ii42 even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans turnover. The balancing report for the : Exhaust fansnn: and it are short of their connected loads] in; Ennhf?s CFM so ifyou lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked CUHZA how come these were accepted. We need to fix them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our N+l criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air flow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but Ithink this was an error on CUHZA part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows differenti will initiate a project to take care of it. and maybe can provide a CAN hill of tnone)f Maths, Chester From: Milby. Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:00 PM To: Probst, Paul E. 'mmeier@cuh2a.com' is: $36,342 Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Buildin Vivarium us 0. 42 202200} Paul, What do you think? i don't like Steve's contention, but we need to address Steve's opinion that this is an E-O issue. I would like to confirm or refute Steve' opinion. Thanks, Steve Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Koob, Stephen H. To: Whatley, Marcus E. Cc: Milbv, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paui E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCGOJBFO) Sent: Mon May 18 10:06:09 2009 i0 ibiiSi:42 :3 Vivarium Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building 5525,? I can puta project in but the bottom line is that this Is an error and omission. Who is going to analyze it? From: Whatley, Marcus E. Sent: Monday, May 13, 2009 10:04 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Noorornid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. I . i thatley, Marcus E. Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium E42 Steve, How about entering a Project in the AMT for this to be analyzed- Thanks. Marcus E. Whatley Branch Chief for CCID FMEO Facilities Capital Improvements Management Of?ce Building and Facilities Of?ce Centers for Disease Control 0 Prevention 770 480-2563 voice 770 408-2599 fax From: Fair, Reuben Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:57 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Whatlev, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. ?Vivarium .--. Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Builc?ng I 23bit Agree with Steve's ossessmeni. Fon CFM must be corrected to ensure proper containment in case of loss of one ton. Reuben J. Fair P.E. ?Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 work: ??0?438-258? cell: 404-63065TB tax: email: rhf9@odc.gov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use onlyr and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contrasted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCJOCODIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 7:29 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) {bi M3142 Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium SC 43 eszaim Paul It now appears that CU H2A is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all right was the reason they.r accepted the fans as being less than speci?ed. GBA was wrong. The statement in their narrative: ?If a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairs U.S.C. 262ath I the system will continue to ?o erate under normal operating conditions. The of the pair ?Mt a t" lure will be able to maintain system, .5 m; is nottrue for crises of .fan -. It is true for they do..th .meet?what? is specified. ?rst discovered in 200? but at that time the two position damper was going wide open on fan failure. During the hangs we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers closed we could not maintain static with one fan and while reviewing the balancing report the shortage was identi?ed. If these fans would have met the speci?cation requirements this would not be an issue but they were not made to nee - i?cation requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation of a single fan in regards to Fans ml and that is the issue Do we just accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CDC even though it is not what is speci?ed? The bottom line is that this needs to be corrected. EBEsih: .r-H From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCKOCOOIB I ivi'varium i3 Di 3} 42 Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building ?3 CA Steve: Here is some info on the fan pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009-123]. PM To: Milbv, Stephen C. Whatlev, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium {3342 Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from SBA and looked to see if there were any issues during the Ex process. Fortunately there was a reference and I have copied most of the relevant Information for vour review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the Ex report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Cx testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identified in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 ofVolume If you read the sections vou will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and mat; be the source of the problem Steve Kooh is experiencing. Call if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman. PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDR I mnv.CUH2A.corn Direct +1 (404) 601-3680 Cell I Fax +1 (404} 815-310? 1201 Peachtree Street, Suite 600 1 Atlanta, GA 313361 I USA ONE Ranking Mir} Gruou All information con tained in or attached to this email may he privileged. con?dential and protected by disclosu re. It you think that you have married this communication in error, lease notifyr the sender and delete this email. From: Milbv, Stephen C. Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:27 AM To: Whatiey, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon, Freeman, William lb} (342 .S onset Paul and Michael, Let?s talk about this next week. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld lDriginal Message From: Whatley, Marcus l3. To: Milbv, Stephen c. Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 {El lb} Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Buildiu Vivarium {33"le USE Please get with pen] to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Oriinal Message From: Stephen H. (cocrocoomnoi To: Milby, Stephen C. (cncrocoolBFO); Payne, Michaela. (cnaocoomm) Ce: Fair, Reuben (co crocooasroh Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus a. (on crocooreFO); Bowen, Ken L. (cocrocool'sm); Raymond, George Noototnid, Shahao Elder, Richard (encrocoolpoo); Howard, William (Bill) (coolocooronsl Sent: Fri Maya] 08:50:16 200 Vivarlurn Subject: Exhaust Fans Building Ll SC. Gentlemen [mg-42': t? a It a I ears We have an issue that Was missed prior to Buildinturnover. The balancing report for - -- ortage of CFM ??on?l the design See attached) The balancer did total the cornerth lrad and it showed that the fans even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans ?3333342 were short of their connected leads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 59] connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 12260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked CUHZA how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our N+l criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on CUHQA part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUT-12A can provide :1 CAN full of money Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Fair, Reuben (CDCICGHIDGHA) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:24 AM To: Daniels, Charles E. Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFOL Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (CDCJOCDOIOSHEE Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOFBFCI) (bi lbil3):42 Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium u's 252mm Charles is absolutely correct. I Think a valid approach is To write a strong letter To CUT-12A saying That we suspect a design error and allow Them To do The sTudy. [i may be possible that The ions can be resheaved for a modest cost and it won?T be such a big deal. if The fans must be replaced, that is another story. in any event iT is incumbent upon us to let Them evaluate Their alleged error. Reuben J. Fair P.E. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 work: Nil-488258? cell: 404-630-65?8 fax: ??0?438-266? email: rhf9@cdc.gov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Daniels, Charles E. (CDCKOCOOJBFD) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:15 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCJOCODIBFD): Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Miiby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. m, {m Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Buildinif?l Vivarium The ?rst question to ask to PBS is "Will you support the ?ndings?? If not, don?t waste anyone's time Thank you BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey From: Kooh, Stephen H. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:06 AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. I Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. PM Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium 42 I can put a project in but the bottom line is that this is an error and omission. Who is going to analyze it? From: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCOOBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:04 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. 50' hatley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium 3,342 Steve, How about entering a Project in the AMT for this to be analyzed. Thanks. Marcus E. Whatley Branch Chief for 0003 FMEO Facilities Capital Improvements Management Of?ce Building and Facilities Of?ce Centers for Disease Control 3. Prevention 770 488-2563 voice 488-2599 fax From: Fair, Reuben Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:57 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (cocrocoorsso); Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoorsFo) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. I {b {by Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium 42 USE A ems Agree with Steve's assessment. Fen CFM must be corrected to ensure proper containment in case of or loss of one ton. I?d Reuben J. Fair P.E. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 work: cell: 404?530-658 fax: 7704880136? email: rhf9@cdc.gov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survev and teii us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use onlyr and the resutts will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Monday. May 18, 2009 7:29 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDUOCOOIBFO) Cc: Milbv, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCJOCOOIBFO), Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab EIder,- Richard Howard, William (Bill) in, Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium {31-42 Paul It now appears that CUHZA is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all right was the reason they accepted the fans as being less than speci?ed. ".rrative: ?If a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairs ?37931:? U-S-C- 2523"? . the system will continue to operate under normal operating conditions. The ?an of the pair Wilma will be able to maintain system static pressure?. This is not true for a loss of fanlfwaiqf . it is true for @3354: 252 even though they do not meet what is specified. . . ?rst discovered in 2007 but at that time the two position damper was going wide open on fan failure. During the change we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers closed we could not maintain static with one fan and while reviewing the balancing report the shortage was identified. If these fans would have met the specification requirements this would not be an issue but they were not made to - - - - ification requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation of a single fan in regards to Fans? and that is the issue Do we just accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CDC even though it is not what is specified? The bottom line is that this needs to be corrected. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, Mat.I 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Knob, Stephen H. {mm 42 Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans BuildinVivarium USC i 42 - zazarn Steve: . 2523"? en the fan pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. I'm out today. can to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May as, zoos 12:31 PM To: Milbv, Stephen C. Whatlev, Marcus E. Meter, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. - - (bi Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building 42 Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from SBA and looked to see ifthere were any issues during the C): process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most ofthe relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the Ca report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Ca testing. The next18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identified in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of VDlleE' If you read the sections you wiil see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call ifyou have questions. Bill William T. FreemanJ FE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDR wvanUHZAcom Direct +1 (404) 601-8680 Cell (bile) IFa>i +1 (404)315-3110? 1201 Peaehtree Street. Suite 600 At anta. GA 30361 All infonnatl an contained in or attached to this emait may be privilegedr confidential and protected by disclosure. If you think that you have received this communication in error, lease notify the sender and delete this email. From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIXBFO) Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:27 AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William 014E s?aii?amt eat" ream-ease CC: Probst, Paul E. ?mm-42 SIMilled: Re: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium 5-55 is} 2523an Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Steve Sent from my BIaekB err}! Wireiess Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Whatiey, Marcus E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCXOCODIBFO) Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 lb 3 42 Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Building in Vivarium c. - - i 202aih) :12 Qg?g?men Please get with pan] to discuss. Thanks Sent from my Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Knob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Miiby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Noorornid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Sent: Fri May 01 03:50:16 zoom) to) Subject: Exhaust Fans Buildin Vivarium ?3142 nor? . e. . we have-art issue that'was missed prior "toiZitnmover. The balancing report for th . Exhaust fans identi?ed a sh prtage of CFM ?om the design See attached) The balancer are total the co and it showed that the fans (53(33342 _even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans (mi-3w? irate short of their connected loads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked CUHZA how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing ofthe Vivarium we found some critical rooms Went positive when operating one fan- We need to have our N+l criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but 1 think this was an error on CUHZA part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I wilI initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUH2A can provide a CAN full of money Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEPJ From: Daniels, Charles E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:15 AM To: Koch, Stephen H. Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIDCODIBFD) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Fair, Reuben Probst H. E. (CHEEDEEHOIBFCU Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium i, 202aihl The ?rst question to ask to P60 is "Will you support the findings?" If not, don't waste anyone's time Thank you BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey From: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:06 AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCKOCDOIBFO) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. (COCOOIB i i {bii3i'42 us 262mm Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium I can put a project in but the bottom line is that and omission. Who is going to analyze it? From: Whatiey, Marcus E. (CDCIDCOOJBFD) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:04 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Noorornid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. I Whatiey, Marcus E. Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building i - bi rium i - ,Vtva {3342 use Steve, How about entering a Project in the AMT for this to be analyzed. Thanks. Marcus E. Whatiey Branch Chief for CCID FMEO Facilities Capital Improvements Management Of?ce Building and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control 8. Prevention W0 488-2563 voice 7?0 488-2599 fax From: Fair, Reuben Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:5? AM To: Koch, Stephen H. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Cc: Milbv, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Whatlev, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. (CDCXOCOOJBFO ,m {m Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium l'Bi-tE USE Agree with Steve's assessment. Fon CFM must be corrected to ensure proper containment in case of oloss of one ton. Reuben J. Fair P.E. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 work: 770-488-2587 cell: 404?630-6578 fax: 770?488-2867 email: rhf9@cdc.gov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survev and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 7:29 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatlev, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIDHS) {bl Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building . - Paul It now appears that CUHEA is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all right was the reason they accepted the fans as being less than specified. GBA was wrong. The statement in their narrative: ?If a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairsll'blt3lf42 US-C- 262601) Ithe system will continue to operate under normal operating conditions. The oeratin fan of the pair lure will be able to maintain system static pressure". This is not true for a loss of fan It is true forllbii3ii42 even though they do not meet what is speci?ed. ?rst discovered in 200? but at that time the hvo position damper was going wide open on fan failure. During the change we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers closed we could not maintain static with one fan and while reviewing the balancing report the shortage was identi?ed. If these fans would have met the speci?cation requirements this would not be an issue but they were not made to meet - i?cation requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation of a single fan in regards to Fans and that is the issue Do we just accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CDC even though it is not what is speci?ed? The bottom line is that this needs to be corrected. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. {by Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium Steve: Here is some info on the {ma?a an pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Prohst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFO m} Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from SBA and looked to see if there were any issues during the Ex process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the Ex report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Ex testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identified in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 ofVolume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of Volume if you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Kooh is experiencing. Call if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman, PE. LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA. A Division of HDRI . . - Direct +1 (404) 601-8680 I Cell I Fax +1 (404) 815-310? 1201 Peachtree Street. Suite 600 lAtlanta, GA 30361 USA UN E. COMPANY Pm Err-dating n'lr?mr Gum All information contained in or attached to this email may he prirfeged. con?dential and protected by disclosure. Ifyou ll'linlt that you have received this communication in lease notify the sender and delete this email. From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) [mailtozscm3@cdc.gov] Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:2? AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Cc: Probst, Paul E. {m Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium?)42 r. i Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next Week. Sent from my ElaekBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCICI COOIBFO), Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 {m {m Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Buildin Vivarium 3.134% Please get with pan] to discuss. Thanks Sent ?om my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Knob, Stephen H. To: Milby, Stephen C. (CD Payne, Michael A. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: air, Reuben (CD Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (CDCXOCOOIUHS) Sent: Fri May 01 08:50:16 2009 {bl Subject: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium Gentlemen .. It a cars we have an issue that was missed prior to Buildin turnover. The balancing report for USC- I identi?ed a shortage of CFM ?om the design See attached) The balancer did total the connected load and it showed that the u. I even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans ete easiest-i 5 their connected leads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 69] connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 15569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked CUHQA how come these were accepted We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some 'critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to hate our N+l criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust Fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project-needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible butl think this was an error on CUHZA part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe GUI-12A can provide a CAN ?ll] of money Maths, Chester From: Whatley, Marcus E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:15 AM To: =Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michaei A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Wha?ey, Marcus E. (CDCIOIBFO) (by Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium (3)4 Our people will manage the analysis, probably with consultants other than those "of record" to get an independent version. (Right, Rich?]. Certainly OBE will be considered. Nobody wants to hear "latent defect," but .. Thanks. Marcus From: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:06 AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. =01 Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium I can put a project in but the bottom line is that this is an error and omission. Who is going to analyze it? From: Whatley, Maraus E. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:04 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFO): Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium Steve, How about entering a Project in the AMT for this to be analyzed. Thanks. Marcus E. Whatley Branch Chief for CCID 3: FMEO Facilities Capital Improvements Management Of?ce Building and Facilities-Of?ce Centers for Disease Control 0 Prevention 770 438-2563 voice 770 438?2599 fax From: Fair, Reuben (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:57? AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Eider, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. (m Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium 3?43 Agree with Slaves assessment. Fon CFM must be corrected to ensure proper containment in cose of loss of one ton. Reuben J. Fair Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 work; cell: 404-630-65?8 fax: email: rht9@cdc.gov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 ?:29 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Co: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) lb) {mom Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Buildin 5,32]: Vlvariurr Paul It now appears that CUHZA is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all right was the reason they accepted the fans as being less than speci?ed. I ament in their narrative: the system will continue to an of the pair that has antaIIure will be able to maintain system I itistrue for . .- - even though they do not meetwhat ?if a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairs operate under normal operating conditions. The static pressure". This is not true for a loss of fan I is speci?ed. This was first discovered in 2007 but at that time the two position damper was going wide open on fan failure. During the change we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers closed we could not maintain static with one fan and while reviewing the balancing repert the shortage was identified. If these fans would have met the speci?cation requirements this would not be an issue but they were not made to wet the seci?cation requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation of a single fan in regards to Fans and that is the issue Do we just accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CDC even though it is not what is specified? The bottom line is that this needs to be corrected. From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 13, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCKOCOOJBFQ lb). Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium Steve: Here is some info on lien pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week. but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William [mailtozWFreeman?cuh2a.com] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. {m hVivarium Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building I Steve, lpulled up the commissioning documents from SBA and looked to see ifthere were any issues during the Ex process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts ofthe Cs report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the C): testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identified in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of Volume If you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman, PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDR I wwthUHZAoom Direct +1 (404) 601?8630 I Cell I Fax +1 {404) 315-3107 1201 Peachtree Street, Suite 000 lAtlarrta, GA 30361 I USA one sperm 1: I Bkakfagifti-w smas- All information contained in or attached to this small may be pnvi!eged, con? dental and protected by disclosure. If you think that you have received this communicates in error, lease notify the sender and piles this emait. From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:27 AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Co: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans BuildinVivarium this; 42 -- - Paul and Michael, Let?s talk about this next week. Steve Sent ?'orn my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. To: Milby, Stephen (CDCHOCOOIBFO) Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 i0) Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Buildiu {ii Vivarium ill} 31:34? .--.. Please get with paul to discuss- Thanks Sent ?orn my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Koob, Stephen H. To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Co: air, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. (CD00 Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) {rt?nr?iOCOOfOl-IS) Sent: Fri May Oi 08:50:16 200 (m 4? Subject: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium LI 5 E. .4 ?262e Gentlemen in; Imus-:42 so [t a - cars we have an issue that was missed prior to Buildin uuno ver. The balancing report for thel:l'Exhaust- tasse- identi?ed a shortage of CFM born the design See attached} The balancer did total the copgfLe?d lgad and it showed that the t?anslibll3ii42 U- I even though low Were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans mil-all? I were short of their connected leads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. suggest we asked how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our N+l criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature oFrooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but 1 think this was an error on CUH2A part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUHZA can provide a CAN ?ll] of money Mattie, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEE) From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:06 AM To: Whatlev, Marcus E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne. Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels. Charles E- Fair, Reuben (CDC Probst. Paul E. 5Ubject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium i can put a project in but the bottom line is that this is an error and omission. Who is going to analyze it? From: Whatley, Marcus E. Sent: Monday, May 13, 2009 10:04 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Cc: Milbv, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben (cocrocooreFO); Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoore {QB-Jigh- tlev, Marcus E. Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium Us? sseeim Steve, How about entering a Project in the AMT for this to be analyzed. Thanks. Marcus E. Whatley Branch Chief for 8i FMEO Facilities Capital Improvements Management Of?ce Building and Facilities Of?ce Centers for Disease Control Prevention WU 488-2563 voice 770 488-2599 fax From: Fair, Reuben (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, zoos 9:57 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Milbv, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. (coo/ocoorsm); Bowen, Ken L. (cocrocoorsFO); Raymond, George (cocrocoorsFO); Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO m) is} Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium t3l'42 42 so ?262a Agree with Steve's assessment. [hi Fon CFM must be corrected to ensure proper containment in Case of Cl loss of one ton. Reuben J. Fair P.E. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 work: 77048892587 cell: 404?630-5578 fa 2-: 770?438-265? email: Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOXBFD) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 7:29 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDC/ocooxaroi Cc: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Payne, Michael A. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Noorornid, Shaha Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) {m Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium (3)42 Paul it now appears that CUH2A is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all rightwas the reason they accepted the fans as being less than speci?ed. GBA was wron . The statement in their narrative: ?If a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairs Itblt3li42 ?2523thl the system will continue to operate under normal operating conditions. The?'an of the pair that has a fa lure will be able to maintain system static pressure". This is not true for a loss of fan (?13:42 . it is true for .even though they do not meet what is speci?ed. This was ?rst discovered in 200? but at that time the two position damper was going wide open on fan failure. During the change we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers closed we could not maintain static with one fan and while reviewing the balancing report the shortage was identi?ed. If these fans would have met the speci?cation requirements this would not be an issue but they were not made to es the speci?cation requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation of a single fan in regards to Fans bl and that is the issue we just accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CDC even though it is not what is speci?ed? The bottom ?ne is that this needs to be corrected. r?u From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. . Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium Steve: 3 :42 . Here us some Info on the f, Jcf; 5 fan pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. I'm outtoday. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. (?3,42 HVivarium Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building {b 5'63 3 Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from GSA and loolred to see ifthere were anv issues during the Ca process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most of the relevant information for 1,Iour review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts ofthe Cx report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Cx testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identified in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of Volume 1.) If you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and max; be the source of the problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman. PE, LEED-AP Vice President Engineering Principal CUH2A, A Division of HDR Direct +1 (404: 601-8680 I eel Fax +1 {404) 315-310? 1201 Peachtree Street, Suite 600 lAllanta, GA 30351 USA . . r' outsmart-vine ma All contained in or attached to This email may be privileged. can?dendal and protected by disclosure. lived think that you have received this cornmu nicat'm in error. lease nullify die sender and delete this emai. From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:27 AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO {m Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium {3142 JlQl". Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Steve Sent from my BiaekBeny Wireless Handheld Original Messag From: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCXOCOOEBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. Cc: Whatley, Marcus-E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 20(19 lbil3l 43 Subject: Fw; Exhaust Fans Buildin_ Vivarium Please get with paui to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BlackBeny Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Knob, Stephen H. COOJBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCKOCOOIBFD): Payne, Michael A. (CDCIOCCIOJBFD) Cc: Fair, Reuben Prohst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George No oromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (1.231312:{ 0 COOIOHS) Sent: Fri May 01 08:50:16 20G Subject: Exhaust Fans BuildinVivarium Gentlemen m] . It a - ears we have an issue that was missed prior to Buildin - nunover. The balancing report for the 2523'? Exhaust fans i tortage of CFM from the design See attached) The balaneer did total the cor ected it ad and it showed that the fans even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans were short of their connected loads by about 691 if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked GUI-12A how come these were accepted. We need to fix them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have Our N+l criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some ol?the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on CUH2A part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe GUI-12A can provide a CAN full of money It] if! 42 US '3 Mathe, Chester From: Whatley, Marcus E. Sent: Monday, May 13, 2009 10:04 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatlev, Marcus E. M3142 Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium 2523th Steve, How about entering a Project in the AMT for this to be analyzed. Thanks. Marcus E. tiltihatleyr Branch Chief for CCID FMEO Facilities Capital Improvements Management Of?ce Building and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control at Prevention 770 488-2563 voice 770 488-2599 fax From: Fair, Reuben Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:57 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Noorornid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. {h ibii3l42 Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building vivarium 555233,? Agree with Steve's assessment. Fon CFM must be corrected to ensure proper containment in case of or loss of one ton. Reuben J. Fair P.E. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 work: ??0-488-2587 cell: 404-630-6578 fax: 770?488-266? email: rhf9@cdc.gov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survev and tell us about your recent experiences with BFD. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 7:29 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (codeine/0H5) mi if Vivarium Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building {31542 Paul It now appears that CUHZA is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all right was the reason they accepted the fans as being less than speci?ed. GBA was wrong. The statement in their narrative: ?If a single fan failure occurs to one of the 2525th I, the system will continue to operate under normal operating conditions. The .an of the pair ure will be able to maintain system static pressure". This is not true for a loss of fan (?$542 it is true Ileven though they do not meetwhat is speci?ed. This we a ?rst discovered in 200? but at that time the two position damper was going wide open on fan failure. During the change we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers closed we could not maintain static with one fan and while reviewing the balancing report the shortage was identi?ed. If these fans would have met the speci?cation requirements this would not be an issue but they were not made to meet - -- i?cation requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation ofa single fan in regards to Fans ibl and that is the issue Do we just accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CDC even though it is not what is speci?ed? The bottom line is that this needs to be corrected. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Knob, Stephen H. I iVivarium Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building Steve: Here is some info on the an pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatle . Marcus E. Meier, Mark: Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFD Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building . Ivarium Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from GBA and looked to see if there were any issues during the Cx process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most ofthe relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the Ex report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some ofthe operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Cx testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identi?ed in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 ofVolume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 cholume 1.) If you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully' commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to lee monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Koch is experiencing. Call if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman, PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDR l% I Direct +1 (404) 801-8680 I Cel {bli?l i I Fax +1 {404} 315-310? 1201 Peachtree Street, Suite 600 IAtIanta. GA 30361 USA . ONE - Nari Grand All information contained in or attached to this email may:r he privileged. con?dan?al and protected by disclosure. if you thinlt that you have received this communication in Error, lease notify the sender and delete this email. From: Milby, Stephen C. [mailtozscm3@cdc.gou] Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:2? AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Co: Prohst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBF Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Sent ?'om my Elect-(Berry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIO COOIBFO) To: Miiby, Stephen C. Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Probst, Paul E- (CDCIOCOOIBFO) - Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 i {has} 42 Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Building 33 Vivarium it"; a. Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BlacltBerr},r Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Knob, Stephen H. To: Milhy, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. (01300 Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George (CDCIO Noorotnid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Fri May ill 08:50:16 200 (m Subject: Exhaust Fans Building ivariurn $35.43 42 seas it'll Gentlemen I. i It 3 cars we have an issue that was missed prior to Building over. The balancing report for the 3 Exhaust fans ibll3ii42 U-S-C- i entitier' a sh rtage from the design See attached) The halancer did total the ?ans Willa? an even though low were close to the connected low. TIhe problem is that fans i-Pi?idg were short of their connected loads by about 692 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected lead and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least l?260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. suggest we asked CUHZA how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our N+l criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but] think this was an error on CUHZA part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUT-12A can provide a CAN full of money Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Fair, Reuben Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:57 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFQ Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne. Michael A. Probst, Paul E. Whatlev, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) Daniels Charles Subject: Exhaust Fans Building Ivariurn P's-Hr! ~l Agree with Steve's assessment. Fan CFM must be corrected to ensure proper containment in case of 0 loss of one fan. Reuben J. Fair P.E. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 work: 770483.258? cell: 404-630-6578 fax: 770488-266? email: rhf9@cdc.gov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 ?:29 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCDDIBFD) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatlev, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) m, ibll3l.42 Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building HVivariurn gag-3%? Paul It now appears that CUH2A is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all right was the reason they accepted the fans as being less than speci?ed. ?If a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairs {bll3ll42 2525(hi the system will continue to operate under normal operating conditions. The of the pair "'lure will be able to maintain system static pressure". This is not true for a loss of fan twin?: It is true lleven though they do not meet what is speci?ed. {E?s ?rst discovered in 2007 but at that time the two position damper was going wide open on fan failure. During the my,? change we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers closed we could not maintain static with one fan and while reviewing the balancing report the shortage was identi?ed. it these fans would have met the speci?cation requirements this would not be an issue butthet,?r were not made i?cation requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation of a single fan in regards to Fans int. and that is the issue Do we just accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CDC even though it is not what is? speci?ed? The bottom line is that this needs to be corrected. From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIDCOWB i'tii Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium ?33 43 [If-f" Steve: Here is some info on the (bi. fan pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. I?m out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Peru From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May as, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatlei Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. (bli3ii42 Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Steve, lpuiled up the commissioning documents from (SBA and looked to see ifthere were any issues during the Car process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the CK report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Cit testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identified in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of Volume 1.) If you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source ofthe problem Steve Knob is experiencing. Call if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman, PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHEA, A Division of HDR oireet +1 (404) 501-3630 Cell Fax +1 (404) 815-310? 1201 Peachiree Street, Suite son i Atlanta, GA 30351 i USA ENE {fl-rm! 5 All information contained in or altadicd to this email may be privileged. con?dential and protected by disc?osure. if you think that you have received this communication in error, lease nct'ty these rider and delete diis email. From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:27 AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Cc: Prohst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOJBF {m W3) 42 Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium as .42 262alh) Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Steve Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Prohst, Paul E. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2039 {b {bumag a Vivarium Subject Fw: Exhaust Fans Buildin 3.6 {3 2623th Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BlackBetry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Koch, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. (CD00 Raymond, George (CDCIO Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard (CDCKO Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Fri May 01 08:50:16 200 Subject: Exhaust Fans Building ivariuni {El an 42 Gentlemen over. The balancing report for the l:l Exhaust- U5 identi?ed a shortage of CFM from the deSIgn See attached) The balancer did total the showed that the fans even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that 1? were short of their connected leads by about 69.1 CFM so if?you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up: I suggest we asked CUHZA how come these were accepted. We need to fix them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our N?t-l criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but i think this was an error on CUHEA part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. i will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUHZA can provide a CAN full of monev Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Freeman, William Sent: Monday, May 18, 2003 i140 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCO F0) loltslee Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ?vivarium 3 5 Paul, 1 don?t have the information handy (at the airport) hutl recall that the item was closed out, which implies that the retesting was done. That the testing was redone does correspond to my recollections. Bill William T. Freeman, LEED AP Woe President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDR Direct +1 {404) I Cell -lbll5i l Fax +1 (404) 815-310? 1201 Peachtree Street, Suite 800 Atlanta, on 30361 USA "5 We - Mfagft?ne?vxui All informati on contained in or attached to this email may be privileg ed, con?denlial and protected by disclosure. If you think that you have received this communication in error, lease notify the sender and delete this email. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:54 AM To: Freeman, William {b 42 Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium '5 .3 saeza Bill: I see where Action item #604 was assigned to this; however, it states re?test'to be done, but do not see where it says anything about a successful follow-up. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. ?ll'lihatley,r Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO {by Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium #3142 US C. Ste vs, I pulled up the commissioning documents from EBA and looked to see if there were any issues during the Cl: process. Fortunately there was a reference and i have copied most ofthe relevant information for 1your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts ofthe Cx report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Cit testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action item list with the entry identified in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of?volume 1.) If you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call if you have uestions. Bill William T. FreemanI PEI LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDR Direct +1 {404} 801-8680l Ce Fax +1 (404} 815-310? 1201 Peachtree Street, Suite 000 Atlanta. GA 30301 USA one congrath ?rc?ing?h Ali information co stained in or attached to this emaii may he orb-rileged, con?dential and protected by disclosure. If you lhinlt that you have received this communication in lease nolily the sen der and debate this email. From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Friday, Mailr 01, 2009 9:27 AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meie Mart; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Cc: Probst, Paul E. ,2 Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building gt v?ivarium c; 0 "II-ll"! (1-. Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Steve Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message .Frotu: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Probst, Paul E. Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 {9 (bits; 42 Vivarium Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Building gag-Ch? at Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks Sent them my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Koch, Stephen H. (CDCIO COOIBFO) To: Mlby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. I Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ, Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCODIBFOL Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Noorotuid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Sent: Fri May 01 08:50:16 2009 {b 00 Subject: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium 6342 so. gaaza Gentlemen . ., issue that was missed prior to Building turnover. The balancing report for the Exhaust fastens identi?ed a shortage of CFM from the de See attached) The balancer did total the connected load and it showed that the fans even though Iow were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans (bll3l742 were short of their connected loads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both ofthese fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving Us 16569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to gel the air Up. I suggest we asked CUHZA how come these were accepted We need to fix them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when enefan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but [think this was an error on GUI-12A part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows di?'erent. I will initiate a project to take care of- it and maybe CUHEA can provide 3. CAN full of money Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday. May 18, 2009 7:29 AM To: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. FairI Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howarilliam i3 Subject: RE: ExhaUSt Fans Building Vivarium 42 USC Paul It now appears that CUHZA is banking on the statement that GBA made that everything was all right was the reason they accepted the fans as being less than speci?ed. ?If a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairs ?may? 252ath the system will continue to operate under normal operating conditions. The of the pair that has a ?lms will be able to maintain System static pressure". This is not true for a loss of fan lbil3ii42 It is true fo on even though they do not meetwhat is speci?ed. '5 was ?rst discovered in 200? but at that time the two position damper was going wide open on fan failure. During the change we had the damper modulate to maintain static and that is when we saw that even with both dampers closed we could not maintain static with one fan and while reviewing the balancing report the shortage was identi?ed. If these fans would have met the speci?cation requirements this would not be an issue but they were not made to meet the speci?cation requirements. The connected load does not meet the operation of a single fan in regards to Fans and that is the issue we Just accept that because GBA said it worked that it is acceptable to CDC even though it is not what is speci?ed? The bottom line is that this needs to be corrected. From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCODIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. .J i_ Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium .4 Steve: If) Here is some info on the fan pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO Vivarium - . . - - (3142 Subject. RE. Exhaust Fans Budding Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from GBA and looked to see if there were any issues during the Cat process. Fortunately there was a reference and I have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the Cit report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some ofthe operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Ex testing. The next 13 pages are the testing protocols and 1 the last page is the Action item list with the entry identi?ed in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of Volume 1.) if you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call it you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman, PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of Direct+i (404) 601-8530 1 can +1 U-S- IFax +1 (404} 315?310? 12m Peachlree Street, Suite son I Atlanta, on 303611 use ?at-.1 owe nominate! - Gama: All iniormatio oontained in or attach an to this email may be privileged, con?dential and protected by disclosure. liyou think that you have received this communication in error, lease notify the sender and delete th's email From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:2? AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCDOIBFO {m - hVivarium Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building one Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Steve -- Sent From my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCKOCOOFBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Probsr, Paul E. Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 ZUUQ {big} 42 Vivarium Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Buildin 5?3 42 252mm Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks Sent ?-om my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Knob, Stephen H. (CDCFOCOOIBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Noommid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (CDCKOCOOIOHS) 2 {314 an. .issue that. Buildin?turnover. The balancing report for the-- Exhaust id?honage of CFM from the design See attached) The balancer did total the showed that the fans - b3 3 :42 i even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans were short of their connected loads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least Wilt-i0. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked GUI-12A how come these were accepted. need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our N+l criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air flow. I guoss a project needs to he set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on GUI-12A part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUT-12A can provide a CAN of money Sent: Fri May 01 08:50:16 200 Subject: Exhaust Fans Buildin 5 Vivarium :fd Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEF) From: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:55 AM I I To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCO 13315154? Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium 252mg Are you here today. Honestly this has nothing to do with the issue. Why were the fans accepted when they were not even close to design?;I From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, May 18, zoos 5:50 AM To: Koob, Stephen H. (CDQOCODIB E42 Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building Ivarium so, - 2132 Steve: Here is some info on thfan pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. (coefocooiaFo ,b Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium {3142 13 us 13 25231 Steve, pulled up the commissioning documents from GBA and looked to see if there were any issues during the Ex process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the CK report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some ofthe operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the Cx testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identified in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 ofVolume 3 and Page 21 is from Section El ofVolume 1.) lfyou read the sections you will see that EBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman, PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDR wwaUHEAcom Direct +1 1404) 661-8680 Co I Fax +1 (404) 315-3111? 1201 Peachlree Street, Suite 800 Atlanta, GA 30361 USA ONE Ming MW [hound All iniormatio contained in or attached to this email may be prh'iieged. con?dent at and protected by disclosure. "you think Itiatyou have received this communication in error. lease notity the sender and delete this email. From: Milbv, Stephen C. (CDCIOCUOIBFO) Sent: Friday, May DI, 2009 9:27 AM To: Whatlev, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William ec: Probst, Paul E. (CDC/ocooiaF Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building ivariumialsz SC "3898i Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Steve --. Sent from my BlackBeny Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Whaticy, Marcus E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 lot ivarium I Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Buildi {3142 Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Knob, Stephen H. To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatlev, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIB Nooromid, Shahab (CD Elder, Richard (encrocoorpooi; Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) - Sent: Fri May 01 08:50:16 2009 Subject; Exhaust Fans Building Eb Vivarium an. issue that-was missed prior rebuilding Drill-never. The balancing report for theE?xhaust failissllil 3 - - - u-ir-t Thebalancerdidtotal -- -- ,5 showed that the fans avail though low were close to the connected)!ow. The problem is their connected loads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 69] connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of? these fans that were supposed to be. designed for2 1 Still and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked CUHZA how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our N+l criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature ofrooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally,r 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on CUH2A part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUHZA can provide 3 CAN full of money Gentlemen 5- . . 2 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CocrocooraFO) Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:54 AM To: 'Freeman, William' {b tbtl3'1'42 Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium Bill: I see where Action Item #604 was assigned to this; however, it states re-test to be done, but do not see where it says anything about a successful follow-up. Paul From: Freeman, William mailto:WFreeman cuh2a.corn Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. I ?3.42 1 Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans BuildingVivarium us 262athi Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from GBA and looked to see it there were any issues during the process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the (Is report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the C): testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identified in the testing section. {Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of Volume 1.) If you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Kooh is experiencing. Call if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman, PE, LEED AP i?rice President, Engineering Principal CUHZA. A Division of I I .n Direct +1 (404] 501?3550 car I Fax +1 {404} 315-310? 1201 Peachtree Street, Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30361 USA ass cohtPANt? IL, protected by disclosure. It you think that you have reoeived this communication in error, lease ncL'ty lire sender and delete this email. From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCJUCUOKBFO) Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:2? AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William 1 Ce: Proust, Paul E. (CDCXOCOOXBF Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building mica-42 Vivarium uses 252mm Paul and Michael, I Let's talk about this next. week. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E- (CDCIOCO OIBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. Ce: Whatley, Marcus E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODEBFO) Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium it? ray-42 llC'J" Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks Sent ?om my BlackBeny Wireless Handheld Original Message From: KoobI Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Ce: Fair, Reuben Probst. Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E- Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Noorornid, Shahah Elder, Richard (CDCJOCO Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Fri May 01 08:50:16 2009 {m Subject: Exhaust Fans Building?v'ivarium 1.3342 {3 Ill?!? Gentlemen M. 4: U5: itsd?ppears wehaye an__.issue..that was missed-prior to-B-uild'mDrnover. The balancing report for the Exhaust renew it, ortage of CFM from the design See attached) The balancer did tota the co met.th and it showed that the fans even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans lbllaii?lz were short of their connected loads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some ro l1i??j SUolilV?. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 17260. it appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. 1 suggest we asked CUHZA how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We heed to have our N+l criteria Satis?ed becau5e of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on CUHZZA part in accepting these deficient fans unless someone knows different. 1 will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUHEA can provide a CAN full of money Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Monday, May 18, 2009 6:50 AM Koob, Stephen H. lb} Subject: FW: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium 23H - IXOS CDC 1123 KB Attachments: placeholder.tmp Steve: Here is some info on the fan pair you brought uop a few weeks ago. Tried to call last week, but you must have been out. I'm out today. Call tomorrow to discuss. Paul From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Wha?ey, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, .?lon Cc: Probst, Paul E. {oi hVivarium Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building {2364 Steve, I pulled Up the commissioning documents from GEA and looked to see ifthere were any issues during the Ca process. Fortunately there was a reference and have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the Ex report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result ofthe Cir testing. The next 13 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identified in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of Volume if you read the sections you will see that was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source ofthe problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman. PE, LEED AP Vice President, Engineering Principal A Division of HDR I a Direct +1 {404) 501-3330 I Call Fax +1 {404) 315-310? 1201 Peachtree Street. Suite 600 IAtIanta, GA 30361 I use i?ill inionnalion contained in or attached to this email may he privileged, con?dential and protected by disclosure. If you think liiat you have received this communication in enor, [ease noliiy the sender and delete this ema?. From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:2? AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon;r Freeman, Wilfiarn Cc: Probst, Paul E. in} Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium {5142 Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Sent ?'om my BlackBen-y Wireless Handheld Original Message hr- From: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCHO COOIBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Whatlcy, Marcus E. Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Building 'Vivari um i3 USC can? Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Knob, Stephen H. To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIO Payne, Michael A. Cc: Fair, Reuben (CDCIDCOOIB Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Noorornid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William 03in) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Sent: Fri May 01 03:50:16 2009 [b {in Subject: Exhaust Fans Building ivarinm Gentlemen issue that was missed prior to Buildingover. The balancing report for the: Exhaust .I1: identi?ed a shortage of CFM from the design See attached) The balancer did total the co oad and it showed that the fan even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans ilbl were short of their connected loads by about 691 CF so if you lose one fan you are short 69] cemented load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16559 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked GUI-12A how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our N+l criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3 .0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because theyr lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but i think this was an error on GUI-12A part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. Iwil] initiate a project to take care of it and maybe GUI-12A can provide a CAN of money Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Milby. Stephen C. Sent: Friday. May 03. 2009 1:16 PM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen. Ken L. Bracewell, Jennifer K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subiect: Re: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium has 262301} Bill. Thanks. Paul, Could you please let us know what you think and follow-up with Steve and ThanksI Steve Sent from my BlaokBerryr Wireless Handheld From: Freeman, William To: Milby, Stephen C. Whatlev, Marcus E. Meier, Mark Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Fri May 08 12:31:20 2009 m, {3142 Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Buildin Vivarium so 262mm Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from GBA and looked to see if there were any issues during the Ca process. Fortunately there was a reference and I have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the Cx report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the C2: testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action Item list with the entry identified in the testing section. (Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of Volume If you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfully commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call ifyou have questions. Bill William T. Freeman. FE, LEED AP WEE President, Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDR wwaUHZAcc-m Direct +1 (404) 601-8680 i Cal Fax +1 (404) 315-310? 1201 Peachlree Street, Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30361 USA - ONE COM PAN Pm ?ocking Hm Guard All information contained in or anal-had in this email ma],r he privileged, con?dential and protected by disclosure. il you think Inst you have received this some nicatinn in error. lease notify me sender and delete this email. From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:2? AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Co: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIB Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building ivarIUm {jigs 2023 Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Steve Sent ?om my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Prohst, Paul E. Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 (hits) 42 Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Buildin El . Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BlackEerry Wireless Handheld Original Message um From: Knob, Stephen H. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCKO Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul B. (CD Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Noorornid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOKOHS) Sent: Fri May 01 08:50:16 200 {m Subject: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium 42 -4 UEC I at time? so. a a ears?we.ha.ve..an.issue that was missed prior to Building?umover. The balancing report for the Exhaugt?in?sam; i ,ortage of CFM from the de See attached) The balancer did total the cormected load and it showed that the fans limit-33:42 I even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans '03} i were short of their connected loads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 69] connected load and some rooms go positive. My quastion is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for21500 and it Was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. i suggest we asked CUHZA how come these were accepted. We need to for them though because during our recent testing ofthc Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our N+l criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on CUE-12A part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. i will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe can provide a CAN mu ofrnoncy 2 Mathe, Chester (cocrocooroseet From: Freeman, William Sent: Friday. May 03, 2009 12:31 PM To: Milbv, Stephen C. Whatley, Marcus E. Meier. Mark: Crane, Jon Cc: Probst, Paul E. F0) is; Subject: RE: Exhaust Fans Building varium (3)4 - IXOS CDC 1121 KB Attachments: placeholder.tmp .2. Steve, I pulled up the commissioning documents from GBA and looked to see ifthere were any issues during the Cs: process. Fortunater there was a reference and I have copied most of the relevant information for your review and evaluation. There are actually three different parts of the Cx report attached. Pages 1 and 2 are a narrative outlining some of the operating conditions for CDC to be aware of as a result of the C): testing. The next 18 pages are the testing protocols and the last page is the Action item list with the entry identi?ed in the testing section. {Pages 1 through 20 are in Section 2 of Volume 3 and Page 21 is from Section 9 of Volume If you read the sections you will see that GBA was able to successfullv commission the fans in question. You will also note that there was an issue that had to be monitored and may be the source of the problem Steve Koob is experiencing. Call if you have questions. Bill William T. Freeman. PE. LEED AP Vice President. Engineering Principal CUHZA, A Division of HDR Direct +1 [404) ism-ease I Ce Fax +1 (404) 315-310? 1201 Peachtree Street, Suite 500 lAtlanta, GA 30361 i USA ONE COMPANY Might-u! Emmi All information contained in or attached to this email may be prim'leged, con?dential and pmlecled by disclosure. If you think that you have received this communication in error, lease notify the sender and delete this email. From: Milbv, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:27 AM To: Whatley, Marcus E. Meier, Mark; Crane, Jon; Freeman, William Cc: Probst, Paul E. (coo/ocoorero . (iguana Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium Sagan? Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Sent from my BlackBeny Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatley, Marcus E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To:Mi1by, Stephen C. (CDCIOCODKBFO) Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Probst, Paul E. Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 in] I I F. - - Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Building if} ivarmm 13:42 tr 9 2 . Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BlackBerIy Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Knob, Stephen H. To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Fair, Reuben (CDCKOCO Probst, Paul E. Whatiey, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George No oromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOJOHQ Sent: Fri May 01 03:50:16 2009 (h {m Subject: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium 42 i3 .nvaeEGg?igliemen ?ill-E A: 5 some an issue that was missed-prior-to Bui-ldin-EItlu?nover. The balancing report for the Exhaust arses-m ?331131142 Ues-C- identi?ed a shortage of CFM from the design See attached) The balancer did total the coad and it showed that the U- I even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans were short of their connected leads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 69] connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to he designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least U260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked how come these were accepted. We need to fix them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air flow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible butI think this was an error on GUI-12A part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe GUI-12A can provide a CAN ?ill of tourney 42 i I, - 7152 ill"- 3523'? It. appears we-have a-n-tss-u-e that The report for the -- Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFQ- Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 12:5? PM To: Payne, Michael A. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Elder, iv and Subject: Exhaust Fans Building Jivarium Us {3 .5, 42 2625101} and, I do not think it is appropriate for Steve to assume that CUHZA is responsible for an error, and ask them to pay for this without more information. This may well be a design error, but we do not know enough now to say so, and we should notjurnp to conclusions. This might be a Hemisphere commissioning issue, a CDC review issue or there may have even been changes to the system or controls since construction. There are plenty of known AE design errors that bother me. I am not defending anyone, but it is too early to accuse any one party in this case. Comments like these are not professional or helpful. Thanks, Steve Messager~--? From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 3:50 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E- Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard (cocxocoofpco); Howard, (Bill) (rocr Subject: Exhaust Fans Building ivarium 42 mu 4: us Exhaust fans identi?ed shorta of CFM from the design See attached] The balancer did total the connected load and it showed that the leven though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans 19 and 20 were short of their connected loads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 15569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked CUHZA how come these were accepted. We need to fix them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air flow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on CUHZA part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUHZA can provide a CAN full of money Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Friday, May 01. 2009 9:27 AM To: Whatlev, Marcus E. 'wfreeman@cuh2a.com' Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCFO) $342 Subject: Re: Exhaust Fans Building Vivarium L, 5 Paul and Michael, Let's talk about this next week. Sent from my BIackBerrv Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Whatlev, Marcus E. To: Milby, Stephen C. Cc: Whatlev, Marcus E. {common/em}; Probst, Paul E. Sent: Fri May 01 09:23:25 2009 lg] {m Subject: Fw: Exhaust Fans Building; ivarium (3)42 USE. Please get with to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BiackBerrv Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Koob, Stephen H. To: Milbv, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatlev, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William (Bill) {coc/ocooxoesi Sent: Fri May 01 08:50:16 200 {b Subject: Exhaust Fans Buildingivarium Gentlemen m: a. It appears we have an issue that was missed prior to :urnover. The balancing report for the Wig Exhaust ?2 ll identi?ed 2 shortage of from the design See attached] The balancerdid total the connected load and it showed that the fans an, even though low were close to the connected low. The problem is that fans 19 and 20 were short of their connected leads by about 591 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheavesor even motors should have been changed to get the air Up. suggest we asked CUHZA how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our 1 criteria satis?ed because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air ?ow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on CUHZA part in accepting these deficient fans unless someone knows different. I wiII initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUHZA can provide a CAN full of money Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Whatley. Marcus E. Sent: Friday, May 01. 2009 9:23 AM To: Milbv. Stephen C. Cc: Whatley. Marcus E. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Fw: ExhaUSt Fans Building Vivarium {31,42 Attachments: anbal.pdf us Please get with paul to discuss. Thanks Sent from my BlackBerrv Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Milby, Stephen c. (cocjocoo/Bro}; Pavne, Michael A. (cociocoomFO) Cc: Fair, Reuben Probst, Paul E. Whatlev, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Noorornid, Shahab Elder, Richard Howard, William {Bill} Sent: Fri May 01 08:50:16 200 Subject: Exhaust Fans Buildin 42 5.0 262361} . lemen wasmissedpnor? turnover. The balancing report for Exhaust fans identified a shortage of CFM from the design See attached) The balancer did total the I connected load and It showed that the fans lblt3if42 U- even though low were close to the conneded low. The fans. were short of their connected loads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are short 691 connected load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both of these fans that Were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 17260. It appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. suggest we asked CU HZA how come these were accepted; We need to fix them though because doring our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our criteria satisfied because of the critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and or fan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they; lost some of there exhaust air flow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on CUHZA part in accepting these deficient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and mavbe CUHZA can provide a CAN full of money RESEARCH AIR FLO, INC. Certi?cation No. 2736 [El?n-12 202301:- OUCT TRAVERSE REPORT PROJECT CDC BUILDING UNIT DUCT EFFECTIVE REQUIRED ACTUAL REQUIRED ACTUAL DUCT SP. I NUMBER SLZE AREA VELOCITY VELOCITY C.F.M. INCHES H70 U.S.C. 252301) REMARKS (1) THE CONNECTED LOAD 2000 CFM (2) THE CONNECTED LOAD 4240 CFM (3) THE CONNECTED LOAD 17260 CFM (4) THE CONNECTED LOAD 23600 CFM THE REVISED CONNECTED LOAD 10950 CFM THE CONNECTED LOAD =11000 CFIUI TOTALS OBTAINED WITH VELGRID READING ACROSS HOT WATER COIL WITH AHU RUNNING AT 46.1 Hz. TEST DATE 028105 TESTED ET B. TRUETT 8: T. VANN RANDOLPH S. CERTIFICATION 2T36 Exp. manna Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: To: 5: Subject: Attachments: Gentlemen iti?, It appears we have an issue that was missed prior to Bulldingurnover. The balancing report for the (bll3iz42 I Exhaust fans. connected load and it showed that the fans problem is that fans short 691 connecte Koob, Stephen H. Friday, May 01, 2009 3:50 AM Milby, Stephen C. Payne, Michael A. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Fair, Reuben Probst. Paul E. Whatley, Marcus E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Nooromid, Shahab Elder, Richard . ard, Wilii'r'n {Billi DCIOCOOIOSHE) ?.ust Fans Building {b Vivarium lb: l C. i342 "EHbEll?df {3 Eggamy ilZIiIfS 412 US '3 ii 2623m- identi?ed a shorta of CFM from the design See attached} The balancer did total the I even though low were close to the connected low. The twill-'4: a were short of their connected loads by about 691 CFM so if you lose one fan you are load and some rooms go positive. My question is how we accepted both ofthese fa ns that were supposed to be designed for 21500 and it was only giving us 16569 and we needed at least 17260. it appears that new sheaves or even motors should have been changed to get the air up. I suggest we asked CUHZA how come these were accepted. We need to ?x them though because during our recent testing of the Vivarium we found some critical rooms went positive when operating one fan. We need to have our criteria satis?ed because ofthe critical nature of rooms going positive on loss of an exhaust fan. We saw the static pressure which is normally 3.0 go to 2.0 when one fan is running because of maintenance lockout and orfan failure and some of the rooms went positive because they lost some of there exhaust air flow. I guess a project needs to be set up to correct these fans as soon as possible but I think this was an error on CU HZA part in accepting these de?cient fans unless someone knows different. I will initiate a project to take care of it and maybe CUHZA can provide a CAN full of money DUCT TRAVERSE Eb RESEARCH AIR FLO, INC. REPORT F- ID Certi?cation NO. 2136 PROJECT CDC BUILDING UNIT DUCT EFFECTIVE REQUIRED ACTUAL REQUIRED ACTUAL DUCTSP. NUMBER SIZE AREA VELOCITY VELOCITY C.F.M. GEM. INCHES H20 (bj{3I:42 DEC. 262a{h) REMARKS: I (1) THE CONNECTED LOAD 2000 CFM (2) THE CONNECTED LOAD 4240 CFM (3) THE CONNECTED LOAD 1??260 CFM (4) THE CONNECTED LOAD 23600 CFM RANDOLPH (5) THE REVISED CONNECTED LOAD 10950 CFM CERTIFICATION THE CONNECTED LOAD =11000 CFM 335 TOTALS OBTAINED WITH VELGRID READING ACROSS HOT WATER Ex? 1mm COIL WITH AHIJ RUNNING AT 40.1 Hz TEST DATE 1I24I05 - TESTED BY E. TRUETT 8: T. VANN PAGE 16 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED INFORMATION SBU -- . SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED . Sensitive ButU-nclassified information must be protected from general release to the public. SBU information, both hard copy and electronic formats, should be physically protected and stored in limited areas. This document contains information that may be exempt from public release under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIAXS USC 552}, Exemption(s) #3 apply. Approval by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Document Control Officer, Of?ce of Security and Emergency Preparedness, and the CDC FOIA Of?cer, prior to the public release via the FOIA Office is required. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEIU) Reference Guidelines Design Construction Standards SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED INFORMATION REVISION HISTORY: (MOST RECENT RELEASE LISTED FIRST) Rev Date Description lnit Section 2.4 Sustainable Design and High Performance Building Guidelines, 2 Sustainable Design Criteria. Indoor Water Conservation and Outdoor Water Conservation: Delete both and substitute revisions. Section 3.4 Numbering Systems: Delete entire section and substitute revision. Section 4.1.5 Campus Mechanical. 3 Tunnel Distribution System Design Considerations. Steam Distribution and Condensate Return: Delete and substitute revision. Section 4.1.8 General Facilities. 2 DESIGN CRITERIA, ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATIONS. Lighting: Delete and substitute revision. Section 4.1.8 General Facilities. 2 DESIGN CRITERIA. STRUCTURAL: Delete and substitute revision. Section 4.2 General Laboratory Planning. 2 DESIGN CRITERIA. STRUCTURAL: Delete and substitute revision. Section 4.2 General Laboratory Planning. 2 DESIGN CRITERIA. ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATIONS: Delete and substitute revision. Section 4.5.1 Conference Facilities with Videoconferencing. 2 Design Criteria. HVAC. Meeting Room Design: Delete and substitute revision. Section 4.5.1 Conference Facilities with Videoconferencing. 2 12i15l?11 Design Criteria. ELECTRICAL: Delete and substitute revision. Section 4.5.2 Cafeterias. 2 Design Criteria. HVAC: Delete and substitute revision. Section 4.5.12 Stairwells. 2 DESIGN CRITERIA. ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATIONS: Delete and substitute revision. Section 4.5.26 Parking Facilities. 2 DESIGN CRITERIA. ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATIONS: Delete and substitute revision. Section 5.03.20 Piping Distribution Systems. 2 System Description or Performance Requirements: Delete and substitute revision. Section 5.03.24 Hot Water Distribution Systems: Delete. Section 505.10 Electrical Service and Distribution. 2 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION OR PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS. Electrical Equipment Spaces. Risers: Delete and substitute revision. Section 505.10 Electrical Service and Distribution 2 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION OR PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS. Electrical Equipment Spaces, Spare Conduit Requirements: Delete and substitute revision. Section 505.10 Electrical Service and Distribution 2 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION OR PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS. Lighting and Appliance Branch Circuit Panelboards: Delete and substitute revision. Section 505.10 Electrical Service and Distribution 2 SYSTEM December 15. 2011 Page 2 of 669 BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (8811) Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, Januaryr 11. 2010 12:46 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOC . ProbstSubject: RE: Updated: P200945 org: HVAC Mod ?mil-2 ?393 What are the EF's and AHU's that you want to test? From: Mossl Karen Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 11:43 AM Frobst, PHUI E. Walpole, lam-19th 252a-hi Him: Mad today-4'2 IU.3.C. . See below from Can we simulate fan failure with supply fan tracking exhaust? That is slow down the supply fan if one exhaust fan fails to maintain system static pressure. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ??0?433?330? Cell: Mill-3256327 Fax: email: KMossl?-cdosov Please visit BFCI Customer Sggisl'ggtigg ?iiwey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. I This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are Invrted to participate in our survey From: Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2010 1:21 PM To: Moss, Karen Campbell John Michael (Mike) (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) -- IOHS) Subject: RE: Updated: P2009453 time: All. It is my understanding that the two exhaust fans for the vivarium are redundant, however they are undersized and we would go positive if we were to shut one fan down. We cannot take that risk with ongoing experiments. It is also my understanding that if you shut the supply off as a precaution to going positive and then shut one exhaust down then you really won't be getting a valid reading because you will be starving the fans for supply air. So at this time OHS is going to request that this testing not take place until the space has been decontaminated. Thanks From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODIBFD) Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 5:48 PM 262mm Ihal?: 4?2 EEZarh'- T0: 3} a AC Mod 553 Slow, manual dampers are missing in the ductwork where needed so will need to have a few of those installed. See you tomorrow. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770435-330? Cell: 404-825-652? Fax: email: seesaw Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction ?ing! and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey,r is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federai and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: Sent: To: I I which . . . HvAc Me When: 'vr-nzoo AM Eastern Tlrne (us Canada). Where: Sorry. it got lost in all the holiday emails. How did your testing go today? O: ib}l3}.42 .s c. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 11:43 AM To; Probst, Paul E. WaIpole Kenneth K. Subject: FW: Updated: P2009453 as HVAC Mocibii3ll42 U-S-C- See below from IE Can we simulate fan failure with supply fan tracking exhaust? That is slow down the supply fan if one exhaust fan fails to maintain system static: pressure. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contrasting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-488-830? Cell: 404625-6527 Fax: TTO-488-2657 email: KMossir?'lchM Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC: Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: I ma; 3' {morocco/0H5) Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 1010 1:21 PM To: Moss, Karen Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) 1. OIOHS) . Subject: RE: Updated: P2009453 HVAC Mod All, It is my understanding that the two exhaust fans for the vivarium are redundant, however they are undersized and we would go positive if we were to shut one fan down. We cannot take that risk with ongoing experiments. It is also my understanding that if you shut the supply off as a precaution to going positive and then shut one exhaust down then you really won't be getting a valid reading because you will be starving the fans for supply air. So at this time OHS is going to request that this testing not take place until the space has been decontaminated. Thanks From: Moss, Karen Sent: - 05, 2010 5:48 PM {coo s3 {jsirsizziz use. a ?Pleat: .. satumaea: cameras HvAc Mo: 252mm Slow, manual dampers are missing in the ductwork where needed so will need to have a few of those installed. See you tomorrow. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Will-433330? cell: Fax: Will?483466? email: Katmai-Ma Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Suggx and teli us about your recent. experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: ions; Sent: Twesdair,r January;' 05, 2010 2:50 PM To: M055. Karen {$0242 (mist-42 use. Subject: Accepted: Updated: P2009453 HVAC Mod - - When: Wednesda January 06, 2010 01:00 AM Eastem 'I'Ime (U5 St Canada]. where: 20, Sorry. it got lost in all the holiday emails. How did your testing go today? Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: . a. CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: uesay, anuary 05, 2010 7:08 AM To: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Probst, Paul E. Koob, Stephen H. Williams, Allison Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID): Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocooliOSHE); Moss, Karen Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFCJ): Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Subject: RE: P2009453 lAir Flow I have thought about this and I am not entirely, comfortable with a work grouo taking actual measurements in the lab. It is one thing to walk into those clean areas but it is another issue when people begin moving around and utilizing equipment {?ow hoodfcurtains etc.) that may disrupt air?ow in those areas, especially the animal room doors. 1 am going to request that at this time all measurements be taken from the HEPA ?ooriinterstisial space. That is why we went to great to have the duotwork outside of containment and why there are already ports in the duct work for these types of measurements. If it is believed that a more precise measurements can be made by taking the measurements inside the actual labs then this should be done when all the labs have been decontaminated. i will be happy to discuss this if there are any issues. Thanks From: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Sent: 04, 2010 12:44 PM To: Halts: 4 Probst, Paul E. Koob, Stephen H. Williams, Allison Powell, Nathaniel Howard, William (Bill) Karen N?gueila, William P. Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIOCDUIBFO) Subject: Everyone. We are proceeding with the Test and Balance Measurements of the existing system tomorrow, Tuesday, January 5, 9:00. We will NOT enter any contaminated areas. The airflow for the active animal rooms will be made from the interstitial space above. We will make measurements for all the clean areas, as much as, possible from the vivarium floor. I spoke with this morning, and no issues are anticipated. Paul Nogueira and I will be escorting the contractors. Thanks, r- Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: .- 04,201012144 PM To: Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFD Koob, Stephen Williams, Allison Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID): Howard, William (Bill) Moss, Karen Nogueira, William P- (CDCIOC Cristina Subject: P2009453 Air Flow Everyone, We are proceeding with the Test and Balance Measurements of the existing system tomorrow, Tuesday, January 5, 9:00. We will NOT enter anyr contaminated areas. 'The air?ow for the active animal rooms will be made from the interstitial space above. We will make measurements for all the clean areas, as much as, possible from the Vivarium floor. I spoke with this morning, and no issues are anticipated. Paul Nogueira and I will be escorting the contractors. Thanks, Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Campbell, John Michael {Mike} (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Vlonda Janua 04, 2010 8:24 AM To: (cocrocooroSI-is) Cc: Probst, Paul E. [Hiya-2 USE i will discuss with Karen From: Uh: t" (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 8:22 AM To: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Cc: Probst, Paul E. I I -- Suhject: 5 252mm Air Flow Why are we taking readings while it is hot? Wouldn?t it be best to do it after the decon? Doesn't Steve Koob have some rough numbers for this area? From: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDQOCOOIBFO) Sent: 04, 2010 8:19 AM To: - I Subject: RE: P200945 Air Flow I am getting pushed, but I am also in i would like to schedule the work for tomorrow if that is not to short of notice for you. i will schedule the work based on your availability. 80 let me know. I From: ?3 cncrocoorOHsi Sent: 'Vionday, Januaryr 04, 2010 3:1? PM To: Campbell, Joh i 1 Mike CDCJOCDDIBFOJ subject: RE: P2009451ibu3x-12 LL50. ?2E2aini Air Flow I am back but I am covered up this morning. Will this afternoon be Than ks From: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Hopefully you are back in the of?ce this Please give me a call when you have time to discuss procedures for Technician going into active animal rooms. Also, need to discuss your availability to help monitor activity. 0: 220-438-2475 C: 404-444-6280 Mathe, Chester From: ?wrc ocroccoro SH Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 8:22 AM To: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Itbili3i-42L'5-0 swath: IAir Flow Why are we taking readings while it is hot? Wouldn't it be best to do it after the decon? Doesn't have some roUQh numbers for this area? From Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Sent: To: Subject Air Flow I am getting pushed, but I am also in I would like to schedule the work for tomorrow if that is not to short of notice for you. I will schedule the work based on your availability. So let me know. From: - (CDCIOCDDIOHS) Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 3:1? AM To: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) subject: U.S.C. 252all'r: I am back but lam covered up this morning. Will this afternoon be Than RE i b} l_ From: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 8:14 AM To; nails} runs;- Subject: P2009453 5 2523? Air Flow I m5 Hopefully you are back in the of?ce this Please give me a call when you have time to discuss procedures for Technician going into active animal rooms. Also, need to discuss your availability to help monitor activity. O: C: 404-444-5280 Mathe, Chester From: Sent: To: Cc: Proust, Paul E. I I Subject: RE: P2009453 Air Flow Why are we taking readings while it is hot? Wouldn't it be best to do it after the decon? Doesn't Steve Koob have some rough numbers for this area? From: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDCJOCDDIBFD) Sent: Monda Janus 04, 2010 8:151 AM To: Subject: I am getting pushed, but i am also in agreement. .. I would like to schedule the work for tomorrow if that is not to short of notice for you. I will schedule the work based on your availability. So let me know. I am back but I am covered up this morning. Will this afternoon be Thanks I From: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Sent: 4, 2010 8:14 AM To: 1 I cc ?s2li H5) Subject: P2009453 Air Flow Ihh?i Hopefully you are back in the of?ce this Please give me a call when you have time to discuss procedures for Technician going into active animal rooms. Also. need to discuss your availability to help monitor activity. O: ??0?488-24?5 C: 404?444-6280 Maths. Chester (CDCJOCOOIOSEP) From: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: unda Janua 31, 2010 3:25 PM To: il Cc: PrritistI Paul E. Subject: RE: Animal Holding I never got anything but I think ifyou review the HOG meeting minutes you will see we discussed this in the HOG. Did you ever send anything to Steve White? From: ll (CDCIOCOOKOHS) Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 11:34 AM To: Koch, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Prohst, Paul E. (CDCIDCODJBFO) Subject: Fw:Animal Holding Didn't we send you something a while back. Fro Daniels Charles E. (CDCIOCODIBFOJ To: mil Cc: Daniels, Charles E. I I: pSeSnt: Fr? -.1 28:47 2010 Animal Holding . - ding through the min . a a Karen Moss, one of my team members. of the January 6 meeting on Building Animal Holding and areas. We cannot resolve the technical utility issues until the OHS written risk assessment requested by Dr. Powell is completed. Then appropriate ARB and CID of?ces wouid need to review, and ?nal decisions. till-[3' 332th Please let me know what the status of the risk assessment is and when it may be expected so we are better able to coordinate the efforts of this project- If you have nay questions, please contact me. Thank you Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDOJBFO) Sent: Monday. January 25, 2010 10:00 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: P2009453 - Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Work Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Nil-480830? Cell: 404-32553? Fax: Wastes-255? em ail: ?Mgss I @gdegov Please visit BFU Customgr g?isigclion Survey and tell us about your recent experiences BFO. This suwey is for internal (:00 use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: Protest, Paul E. Sent: Friday, January 2010 S: 03 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDQUCDDIBFO) Subject: RE: BMW Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Work Karen: Scope comments: 1. We are looking into door sweeps and piping pong caps being done by FSE- 2. Incinerator room is always negative whether incinerator running or not. (yes this is true, i didn?t know it when I wrote the scope.) 3. Mach #5 Where locate stat? (will locate when drawings are done) 4. Mech #7 - Will this require getting aboye gypboard ceilings? Quantity of new grilles? is this the same as Item #11? No ceiling in this area will be exposed duct and grille. 5. Mech #9 assume new hw coils only. System is on VFD. With changes we made the entire system will need to be rebalance. AHU as well. 6. Mech #12 assume sequence of operation will not change from existing and test is to verify sequence. Mech #13 OHS has construed this item as simply a smoke test. i thought it was more than this, per sequence of original safety test. (by 8. Arch#10 -Where is existing door (3M The door in the Well that was put in between area. (WSW and shower Thanks. Paul 404-8 39-0505 From: Mossf Karen Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 5:07 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCKOCUOXBFC): I Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Noqueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) .. Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Work Team. Please see attached Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Work. File: P2009453_Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Regards. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: Wit-433.330? Cell: 4044323632? Fax: I?m-4832567 email: Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experienoes with BFC. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 5:22 PM To: Moss. Karen Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Lingler, Arthur R. Nogueira, William Btanchard, Thomas M. Dc: Bowen, Ken subject: US c. 3 2o23:h,- I All: i met with programs currently using the space that will affected by the above project. and informed them of the increased scope and cost of the project. The issue remains that the area will require a shutdown in order to perform the work. and that we were close to ?nalizing the scope such that we could present the scope to the 8A contractor with whom we are going to negotiate. It was also etcplained that while a shutdown duration of two weeks was being thrown around. BFO had never fully committed to that duration. It was stressed that while we would everything in our power (weekend and night work by the contractorI strategic planning, advance fab of materials. etc), we could not commit to a duration until we presented the scope to the contractor and they digested it, and responded with a realistic schedule. It was also explained that there will be some in-house testing that. based on the results, may require some additional tweaks. The feedback from program is that they need as much advance planning as they can get, and they backed off the start date of the ?rst week of June and indicated that the ?rst week of July would be acceptable. However. they again emphasized the importance of minimizing the shutdown time. Therefore, I am asking thatwe push ahead as necessary to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from 0D, ?nalization of scoper market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Thanks, Paul Probst. PE Asst- Din, Operations BFOfFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-539-0505 Cell: 404-235-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 5:20 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: FW: P2009453]"b""' Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Work Ken: FYI no major comments to scope. Just minor stuff. Thanks. Paul 4 04-639-0505 From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCXOCODKBFO) Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 5:03 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIO Subject: RE: P2009453 @2523? Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Work Karen: Scope comments: We are looking into door sweeps and piping pong caps being done by FSE. Incinerator room is always negative whether incinerator running or not. Mach #5 Where locate stat? Mech ?Will this require getting above gypboard ceilings? Quantity of new grilles? Is this the same as Item #1 ?l Mach #9 - assume new hw coils only. System is on VFD. Mech #12 assume sequence of operation will not change from existing and test is to verify sequence. Mech #13 OHS has construed tl1is item as simply a smoke test. Arch#10 Where is existing door Ch} sews ewes Thanksr Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 5:0?r PM To: Daniels,r Charles E. Tanya A. Arthur R. lmlelp??rsob t, pan] 5, (comer-mommi- Nnnueira OXBFO) .. Con?rmation Estimate and scape or. work Team. Please see attached Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Work. 1 File: P2009453_Confirmation Estimate and Scope of Work.pdf Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE, MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Tim-4854330? Cell: 404-325-632? Fa>c email: Wm Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent expenenoes with BFO. This surveyr is for internal CDC use only and the resuits will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday. January 22, 2010 5:03 PM To: Moss, Karen Subject: RE: P2009453 I?m?g'?u'g '35?2523'? I- Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Work Karen: Scope comments: 1. We are looking into door sweeps and piping pong caps being done by FSE. 2. Incinerator room is always negative whether incinerator running or not- 3. Mach #5 Where locate stat? 4. Mach #7 Will this require getting above gypboard ceilings? Quantity of new grilles? ls this the same as Item #11? 5. Mach #9 assume new hw coils only. System is on VFD. Ei. Mech #12 assume sequence of operation will not change from existing and testis to verify sequence. T. Mech #13 - OHS has construed t1is item as simply a smoke test. 8. Arch#10 Where is existing door ?zz! Thanks, Paul 404-539?0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 5:07 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. BerEch, Tanya A. Lingler, Arthur Ft. Probst, Paul E. eira Will' P. CDC - Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Work US Cl 252301? Subject: P2009453 Team, Please see attached Cen?rrnation Estimate and Scope of Work. ?as File: P2009453_Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Regards. Karen Mess RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Fume?sac? Cell: 404-325?5327 Fax: Tim-433266? email? Kivloss Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and teii Us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the resuite will be used to improve business services. CDC Federai and contracted employees are invited to participate in our eurueyr Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probat, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 RUB AM To: 'Pat Prendergasi? Subject: RE: Vivarium Appreciate it. Thanks. Paul 404-639-0505 From: Pat Prendergast Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 5:43 PM To: Probstr Paul E. Subject: Vwarium Paul, ifound this while digging thru some of the report documentation. item 2 indicates an on-going problem with the two? position isolation dampers not closing fully. This may be something to look at. Don?t hesitate to call whenever you have any questions! Pat Patrick A Prendergast, P. E. GBA ViroCon, Inc. direct: 816.842.4907 ext. 212 fax: 816 42.11 mobile: {We} Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Pat Prendergast Sent: Wednesday, January 20. 2010 5:43 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODKBFO) Subject: - Attachments: 1 .pdf Paul, I found this while digging thru some of the report documentation. Item 2 indicates an on-going problem with the two- position isolation dampers not closing fully. This may be something to look at. Don?t hesitate to cail whenever you have any questions! Pat Patrick A Prendergast, P. E. GBA ViroCon, Inc. direct: 815.842.4530? ext.212 fax: 316.842.1138 mobile: 2. SYSTEM OPERATION CONSIDERATIONS use. 252ath ll 9? - The vari-eone position for with both fans operating should be at 70% open for both fans. This was determined by the manufacturer and TAB contractor by performing extensive on-site testing. - The 1sari-cone position with only one fan Operating should be 100% open fer the operating fan and 0% open for the non?operating fan. EF USE. 2625101} I - If there is a single fan failure to either Egg: 252 both bypass dampers must go fully closed in order to maintain static pressure set point. The sequence is the tum position damper closes and the modulating damper modulates to maintain SP set point. If either of the bypass dampers is cracked openjust the static pressure set point will not be able to be maintained. There has been an ongoing problem with the dampers not closing at 0% open signal from the BAS. [033342 U533. ?2s2arm and Exhaust fan Interlocks If the AHU has bothFAN A and FAN off in a failure alarm all associated exhaust fans will go into safe egress operation. - If the AHU has only one fan failure all associated exhaust systems shall continue to operate under normal operating conditions. - If both fans of either pai the entire System will be disabled. The AHU will be indexed off prior to other exhaust systems de?energizing. If a sin le fan failure occurs to one of the pairs llb?all42 252ath the system will continue to operate under normal operating conditions. The operating fan of the pair that has a failure will be able to maintain system static pressure. - If has a fan failure, (bl-3W will be indexed err, and both exhaust fan pairs will be indexed to safe egress mode. 4. Safe Egress Operation {e {3 :42 use. 262afh 'b Paired fans 3 The lei-in numbered fan will stay ON and even number will be indexed So if the fans are in egress mode, only U-S-C- 25251th Iwil] remain ON with both the two position and modulating dampers 100% open. ?ails-3:42 safe egress operation is the bypass damper goes to 100% open. 5. AHU and EF Restart after a failure. If any of the exhaust fans are in egress mode, the AHU should already be off. To re?enabie the system, the user must first disable the system from the SB Interlocks point in the text mode. Wait for all systems static pressure to drop to Clear any alarms present, then Enable the SB lnterloeks point from text mode. If there is a single fan failure to the AHU or a single fan failure to either of the paired exhaust fans the alarm can be cleared without disabling the system. Simply reset the alarm from either the text or graphics to ON and then to OFF again. The failed fan will be reset and come back on without interruption to the system. Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probsi, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:56 AM To: Daniels. Charla. '59. CoolocooiBFo Subject: FW: P2009453 January 6th Meeting Minutes Thanks, Paul 404-839-0505 From: Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCICCIDINCIRD) Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:52 AM To: Moss Karen Powell, Nathaniel Howard, William (Bill) '5 Probst, Paul E. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) - - - tina Williams, Allison Nogueira, William P. Wicoacannemm Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Tyler, Subject: RE: P2009453 January 6th Meeting Minutes After discussing with all the branches, it seems like the first week in June would be the best time for us to start the shutdown. Would that work for everyone else? Laura I Thanks, From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 1:36 PM To: Powell, Nathaniel (codcoomceocm); Howard, William (Bill) (cocxocoo/OHS); - Probst, Paul E. Zambuto, Laura R. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Ford Maria Cristina Williams, Allison Nogueira, William P. a Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Tyler. John (CDC DCODIBFO) sti?eelgiagoogass. January an Meeting Minutes All, Attached are my meeting notes from our January 5th meeting. Please let me know if you have any corrections or lulleigig agg'gglons. 42%; Meeting Minutes with ARE OHS 1_06_2010.pdf Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representatiye Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: rte?433.330? Cell: 4043254632? Fax: ?70-488-255? email: Ktvlessl Please visit BFO Customer Satisfactiog Sums-1 and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEPJ From: (?1"31142 U-S-C- Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:30 AM To: CIOCOOIBFO) Cc: I Subject: mfg": ?ma January 6th Meeting Minutes Paul, Please ensure to includeand me on future scheduled meetings regarding this project so that we can update DSAT as necessary and address concerns as mentioned by Dr. Powell in the attached minutes. Sincerely. use. 2525.th Customer Satisfaction Survey. This document is intended for the exclusive use of the reeipient(s) named above, It may' contain sensitive information that is protected, privileged, or con?dential, and it should not be disseminated, distn'bnted, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. lfyou are not the intended any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited If you think you have received this document in error, pleaSe notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. From: Prohst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, January.Ir 2t), 2010 3:21 A To: Black, Carolyn Ce: Powell, Nathan 1 n(cocrcc1orncr=ocrn) subject: FW: momssl?gs?'ig anc Mod iblt3iz42 ljanuarv 6th Meeting Minutes Dr. Black and is in design ahase for Not sure if on had received this, but wanted to forward Meeting Minutes regarding a project the hit the Bldg. . nimal Holding area- The basic scope of the project is to convert the existing {bii3ir42 us. into a ?grey? corridor. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCXOCOOIBFD) Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 1:36 PM {enema I Ib?3:42 EBZaih till-[3' 42 Probst, Paul E. Zambuto, Laura R. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Ford, Maria Cristina Williams, Allison Nogueira, William P. (cocrocoorsFO); (cocxcaomcr?ocm) To: Powell, Nathaniel Howard, William (Bill) anuary 6th Meeting Minutes Cc: l_.ingler, Arthur R. Ty S??iect: .. .. HVAC Mod ier John CDC (biijB'i:42 All, ttached are my meeting notes from our January 6th meeting. Please let me know if you have antir corrections or additions. I Ei?ie: P-ZUOQ453HVAC Mod. Meeting Minutes with sits a oHs Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-488-8312}? Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: 1'70-488-255? email: Klvlossl@cdc.gov Please visit BEQ gustomer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent To: Go: Subject: Paul, (mist-42 Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:25 AM Probst, Paul E. Black, Carolyn (CDCIOIDINCEZID) - . . - Nathaniel (coolololucszloi; Williams, Allison U-S-C- 2526 {hi toocr 0) ?mm RE: P2009453 262mm HVAC Mod 25% January 6th Meeting Minutes Thank you for providing these. We?ll need to alert DSAT to the fact that this work will be done since we do have animal USE. holding rooms that are registered for select agent purposes in the Sincerely, USC. ?262atnl OSEP Customer Satisfaction Survey. This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipientts) named above. It may contain sensitive information that is protected. privileged, or con?dential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such information. lfyou are not the intended recipientlEs), any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. lfvou. think you have received this document in error, please notify the sender immediately and desrroy the original. From: Probst, Paul E. (CDQOCOGIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 3:21 . . To: Black, Carolyn (coo/commencem- Cc: Narhan' b, 3142 lison Subject: Fw: P2009453 g'?g'am. 5" I l-lvac Mod ?3393-42 January sci Meeting Minutes {bl . Dr. Black and {31,42 . Not sure trolljha received this, but wanted to fonoard Meeting Minutes regarding a project that is in desi hose for the Bldg. 390-3-th Animal Holding area. The basic scope of the project is to convert the existing Itbil3ii42 into a "grey" corn or. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 1:36 PM To: Powell, Nathaniel Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. Zambuto, Laura R. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Ford, Maria Cristina Williams, Allison Nogueira, William p. - Cc: Lingler, Arthur er. John Subject: P2009453 HVAC Mod ibll3li42 January 6th Meeting Minutes ?75931: Itlj:i3'::42 5 Ail. Attached are my meeting notes from our January 5th meeting. Please let me know if you have any corrections or additions. File: P2009453 ?33272?; vac Mod. Meeting Minutes with ARB a was 1_os_2c10.ptii Regards, a w- Karen Mose RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: sea-azseazr Fair: 170-485-266? email: KMoss Please visit EFQ ngtorner Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experienoes with BFU. This surveyl is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:21 . To: Black, Carolyn (cocromincezm); 010314,? U-S-C- . Cc: Powell. vv 7 .(coci'ommcezro) Subject: FW: P200945 2:32am I HVAC Mod $511931; WA January 6th Meeting Minutes Dr. Black and {ml-33:4 Not sure if ou had received this, but wanted to forward Meeting Minutes regarding a project that is in design aha-=5: for the Bldg. Animal Holding area. The basic scope of the project is to convert the existing {blt3):42 Snag?: into a"grey" corridor. USC 5 262a: - - - 4 Thanks, Paul 404-539-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 1:36 PM To: Powell, Nathaniel Howard, William (Bill) El Probst, Paul E. Zambuto, Laura R. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Ford, Maria Cristina Williams, Allison Nogueira, William P. tingler, Arthur R. CDC Tyl, OCOOIBFO) 2523'?? Subject-:- P-200945-HVAC Mod January 6th Meeting Minutes All. Attached are my meeting notes from our January 6th meeting. Please let me know if you have any corrections or additions. were I P20119453 Hvec Mod. Ila . I) Regards. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-Eli? Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-532? Fax: 710400-266? email: KMoss Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFD. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey 1i ?Ruf?ed?was: m? MEETING MNUTES Center for Disease Control and Prevention Date: January 6, 2009 use. 252a Subjeet: P2009453 {ht Lucation: um. Conference 25 Attendees: Karen Moss DEMO Laura Zambuto - CCID Paul Probst FMEO Christine Ford FMEO Mike Campbell - CIMO Bill Howard - OHS Dr. Allison Williams ARE Dr. Nate Powell ARB OHS Paul No gueira FMEO ARE The ose of this meeting was for OHS to discuss with ARE the HVAC Modi?cations to ma: (busts; use, ?fll'l Discussion: . {h H3 r42 1. Per current airflow Into does not follow proper hiocontainment procedures. Fort Collins air?ow was reversed as is requested in this project. 2. By reversing this air?ow personnel could exit one animal holding room and put Tyvex on in the ?gray? corridor and then enter another animal holding room with out having to shower. 3. ARB stated their procedures would not change; they would continue to change PPE and shower between programs. A 4. Dr. Powell asked what the proc durl rotocol would be when dirty cages are moved into the ?gray? corridor. replied that the procedure w0uld not change. The cages would be surface decontaminated by spraying it down while wearing the PPE and lastly Spray PPE. Dr. Powell asked how personnel would know that dirty cages were in the corridor. replied that some type of coordination procedure would have to written so that personnel do not get put at risk. 6. Dr Powell asked for a risk assessment to be written by OHS. Dr. Powell has monumental concerns about this coordination procedure and the procedures. U1 10 11 12. 13. 14 . When the incinerator is tired air from clean corrido i 2523 stated the shelving in the ?gray? corridor was intended for storage of clean PPE. Dr. Powell asked which is more ?gray?; the corridor or the anteroom to the shower area. replied the corridor is considered to be the ?grayest?. Laura Zambuto stated that this air ?ow directional change is an advantage to ?22m because this would enable them to move equipment from one room to another and eliminate the requirement for redundant equipment. They could move uiment from one room to another roOm; but not to different labs such as It! 3342 9 . Dr. Powell asked for minutes of this meeting to be given to Dr. Black. Dr. Powell asked the select agent be noti?ed as soon as possible about the change in the procedure and that they review the procedure. Select agent would want sequence of operations to be written by OHS. Dr William ask - - not could be built between the and animal holding. replied that would be too expensive. ARE procedures would change if an anteroorn existed. Karen Moss stated that air?ow from de-con room into ould not be guaranteed since there would he no future exhaust in "gray" corridor. The decision was made to build an anteroom to the de-con room. Air would ?ow from secondary entry into de?con room and from the new ante room into de-con room. rating-42 . sucked Into the incinerator room; disrupting the air ?ow into the procedure and anterooms off this n1 urn-nun A mm USO r. The incinerator issue needs to be resolved along with this project. m: was okay with adding a diffuser to corridor between the clean 15. corridor and incinerator roorn. Outage date to sli to May; Laura Zambuto to con?rm dates. Also need to check with the programs about upcoming andfor ongoing projects. units. 42 Mathe, Chester From: Zambuto, Laura R. Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:52 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO Powell Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID): Howard, William (Bill) II (cosiocooi'OSHei; Probst, Paul E. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Ford, Maria Cristina Nogueira, William P. (coci'oc00ieFo); CDCIOIDINCEZID) Cc: Lingler, Arthur I Ty er John Subject: RE: HVAC Mod January 8th Meeting Minutes After discussing with all the IE branches, it seems like the first week in June would be the best time for us to start the shutdown. Would that work for everyone else? Thanks, Laura From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 1:35 PM To: Powell, Nathaniel Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. Zambuto, Laura R. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Ford, Maria Cristina Williams, Allison Nogueira, William P. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. CD I II I John January 6th Meeting Minutes All, Attached are my meeting notes from our January 6th meeting. Please let me know if you have any corrections or additions. I 1 sis:- HVAC Mod. Meeting Minutes with ARE OHS 1_06_2010.pdf Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ire?453-530? Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: 770-433-2667 email: l: ov Please visit EFQ gatisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Howard. William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:44 AM To: Moss. Karen Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subiect: RE: P2000453 Demolition of hepa ?lter housing KarenI I guess that after we do a decon on the units. they can be safety removed and stored on the HEPA floor. We don't have a need forthem at this time that! am aware of, but i will check into the issue. William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Office of Health and Safety 404.639.21?4 678.614.7257 woh3?cdaaov Please visit the DHS Customer Satisfaction Surve?,l and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:23 AM To: Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. Subject: P2009453 Demolition of hepa ?lter housing Bill and Paul turn this over to FMEO or or recycle materials? Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770488-330? Cell: 404-325-532? Fax: email: KMossli?iodc?-og Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Strive; and tell us about your recent experiences with Eii??O. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business senrioes. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe, Chester From: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFW Sent: Tuesday, January ?19, 2010 9:23 AM To: Howard, William {Bill} (CDCJOCOOIOSHE): Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Demolition of hepa ?lter housing Bill and Paul turn this over to FMEO or or recycle materials? Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 4ceseese2? Fax: ??0-488-255? email: KMoss @cdc gov Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Suwev and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only.r and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in cursurvev Mathe, Chester (cocrocoorosee) From: Probat, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:00 PM To: Koob. Stephen 1I IOCOOIBFO) (W342 Subject: FW: P2009453 - HVAC Modi?cations to Con?rmation Estimate and Work On?at'hi FYI Paul 404?639-0005 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 5:0? PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Lingler, Arthur R. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDC "g?PQ?l' William P. {"Dtlt?f??nf F0) Subject: p2009453 .305; anc Modi?cations to - Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Work Team, Please see attached Confirmation Estimate and Scope of Work. :009453_Confirmatit Estimate .. . Regards. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: noose-ass? Cell; 404-525-532? Fax: 1?70?488-255? email: Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFD. This survey is for internal CDC Lise only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey P2009453: HVAC Instill?)?a?l2 252a?) lRoyhal U12f2010 Scope of Work and Confirmation Estimate To: Tanya Charles Daniels Art Lingler Paul Nogueira Paul Probst Reference: Project P2009453 Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate The Con?rmation Estimate for the above referenced project is and. ($700,000. The project was requested by OHS due to a bio?containment issue. The on rent - .. ow out of animal holding rooms is into a common corridor ?bgg?iju'a'c' allowing different type?s diseases to mix together which cares a personnel safety issue. The scope is to reverse the direction of air ?ow and to resolve the capacity issues with Exhaust Fans . The new air path shall be air into the animal holding rooms and thereby containing the disease in the holding room itself. Directional air flow in this area was design to be accomplished via door undercuts. The design velocity through the different door undercut varies from 600 700 fprn; creating a high pressure drop. ASHRAE recommends the velocities of 200 with maximum of no more than 300 fprn. Existing exhaust fans never delivered the design CFle. The fans run in parallel and are 23% short on capacity. If one fan fails system static pressure can?t be maintained and areas that are critically designed to be negative become positive. At some time after the building was built do, wee were installed on doors in the animal holding area and on the doors from the lib-?524? . Ito the procedure room per direction from did not want varmints? escaping through the undercuts. Door sweeps were not put on the anteroom doors to the procedure Adding door sweeps created more pressure drop and further blocked the directional air ?ow path that was problematic from the beginning. ARB has recently requested that the anteroom decrs to the procedure room also have sweeps installed. 'To allow for directional air ?ow the glass in the doors will be re olaced with tempered glass that will have a 1.5 inch (final slot l'as vet to be determined) {bll3lt42 The door .r ..I IIQPRORGQ lo ?01342 has been cached and seafed and this door ItC?f?R?c?a Illnf'f? will be ermanently remove door and replace with a wall and a window. Elevator lobby, (me I becomes unstable when elevator doors open. Elevator lobbies should be pressurised and this one is not: remove exhaust grille from this room to resolve issue. Air new. ?lial? is sucked into the incinerator room when the incinerator is on. This is causing the disruption of air ?ow into the procedure rooms and the anterooms in corridor (bll3314 The proposed scepe to accomplish this project is as follows: P2009453: HVAC Mod. Itblt3l=42 U-S-C- 252ath IRoybal macaw Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate MECHANICAL: 1. Provide baseline test of exhaust and supply grilles and pressure differential across 10. ll. 12. 13. ARCHITECTURAL 1. 2. IIL I - xhau st static pressure at inlet and outlet of existing exhaust fans u. OHS to remove hepa ?lters and decon existing to be demolish ductwork. After decon is accomplished contractor to demolish existing exhaust grilles, ductwork and all associated devices. Cap existing ductwork at tie into main trunk. Tap into existing supply air ductwork in interstitial space and route ew ductwork to existing phoenix supply valve (turn existing exhaust valve around and insulate). Tap into existing hot water pipes and route new pipe to new reheat coil. Provide all associated controls and devices to make a complete supply system. Insulate supply ductworlt and hot water pipe. All devices and equipment to match existing equipment and devices. Provide revised control programming to the BAS. Use existing exhaust slab openings for new supply duct connection to new supply stainless steel diffusers; reuse existing decon exhaust gas tight dampers. seal between slab and ductwork. Provide new control thermostat to match existing thermostats. Provide palatable silicone to seal around diffuser plenum boxes in corridor. Add new stainless steel sopply grille in womem'men shower staging area to pressurize space. Remove existing exhaust grille elevator lobby room g: patch per architectural requirements. Rebalance entire air handler and associated exhaust fans to new airflows. Balance of system to take place at the diffuser; attempt to balance system via duct traverse is unacceptable due to turbulent air ?ow. Test and Balance water systems. Add new stainless steel supply grille to corridor adjacent to incinerator room to pressurize space. This will require tappin into ductwork of and routing of new ductwork and penetrating slab of interstitial space. Add new stainless steel 3 crr?lle to locker room anteroom. This will require tapping into ductworlt of 99,343 - and routing new ductwork. Fan failure test for fans PEPE 9 to be done by assisted by BFO and test and balance contractor. I Safety test at completion of the project to be done by OHS and BFD assisted by the test and balance contractor. to pressurize space and . {blt3 :42 . . Remove and retain door it as includin doorI frame and related hardware. Fill wall opening created by removal of door ibli3lf42 Iwith concrete masonry; provide and install new window in this wall. mil-33542 ?5-0 2526"? (bli3li42 1.1.3.0. 2626th use. aezath} Seal frame and glass to gas-tight {bjt3lt42 condition Provide andinstall new concrete In wa'l in Corridor new Ante Room between Corridor and Decon Room cre ate to use. 252m} P2009453: HVAC Mod. Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate - to 3-: 4. - - ate existing I-IM door flit-4E to new masonry wall in CorridoLI including frame and all hardware. Clean door, frame and hardware of all sealants, re?nish door as necessary, to match existing HM doors in Corridor. 5. Finish new masonry walls to match existing, including epoxy floor 8: base and epoxy paint. 6. Provide and install stainless steel ca at ceiling/slab opening created by demolition of ductwork in room. Seal edges and fasteners to gas ?ti condition; method per approval of OHS. 7. Remove directional air flow ?pin g-pon g? indicator devices from doors. Install manufacturer supplied caps to resulting penetrations in walls. Seal caps and fasteners to gas?tight condition. The following doors are to receive this work: {b)(3)142 use. asaarh) Royha] macaw P2009453. Mud use. 252mm Scone of Work and Confirmation Estimate 1! 1 2.2010 3. Provide and install new continuous rubber door sweeps at doors. Sweeps to be face mounted on door leafs. Seal edges and fasteners to gas-tight condition. The following doors are to receive this work: {enema use. 262a I Itl': j. New door ?lial: at new wall near the [fig Shower Out area. 9. Remove and (in of glass within windows at doors. clear tempered Provide and install new 3 inch glass at doors. Glass to be sized such that 3 inch glass remains on one vertical edge of the resulting assembly. Provide ribbon type directional air flow indicator within glass opening. Seal edges and fasteners to gas-tight cendition. The following doors are to receive this work: ?2625{:h} WM P2009453: HVAC Mod. USC. 252a(hi Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate {exam use. 252mm ccmove and dispose of glass in existing door R551 Royhal U12f2010 Provide and install new in}. inch tempered clear glass within existing window frame. Glass to be sized to entire frame with no slot or opening to remain. Seal fasteners and edges to gas -tight condition. I Royhal Campus. PGO ACQUISTION STRATEGY: During the Con?rmation Estimate process the following additional information has been de?ngd: lbIl3TZ-12 U33 2E2al'h'- 1. Project location: Floorsl 2. Assumption of project type: 3. Program requirements; 4. Complexity of the project: Complex 5. required. Anticipated construction method: 3A Schedule: TBD Please contact me if you have any questiOns. Sincerely, Karen M. Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting O?iceris Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1500 Clifton Fioacl NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 work: ??0-483?8307 ceII: 404-825-8327 fax: Time constraints by Program: To be set by the Involvement of OHS, FMEO, ARE, CCID, ITSO and other support groups as . ivision. mac. zezam} P2009453: HVAC Mod. Ruybal li12f2010 Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEPJ From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday. January ?13. 2010 1:59 PM To: Walpole. Kenneth K. 5? Subject: FW: P2009453 $5572?; HVAC Modi?cations to? - Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Work Emir" Thanks, Paul 404-539?0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIGCODIEFU) Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 5:0? PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Bertsd'I. Tanya A. Ungier, Arthur R. Proost, Paul E. .l - Nogueira, William P. ringiocooi 3 Subject: moses?os?o HVAC Modi?cations to - Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Work Team, Please see attached Confirmation Estimate and Scope of Work. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 4o4-325-sszr Fax: email: Kluge: let-go: Please visit BFO Customer ??ti?jggtign some: and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our surveyr P2009453: HVAC Mod. {sitar-4.2 use. 262a(h) 1l12f2010 Royhal Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate To: Tanya Berta-ch Charles Daniels Art Lingler Paul Nogueira Paul Probst Reference: Proj eet P2009453 Scope of Work and Confirmati on Estimate The Con?rmation Estimate for the above referenced project is $100,000 and {$700,000. The project was {mama requested by OHS due to a bio-containment issue. The cur" ow out of animal holding rooms is into a common corridor . i allowing different type?s diseases to mix together which creates a personnel safety issue. The scope is to reverse the direction of air flow and to resolve the caaeity issues with Exhaust Fans. The new air path shall he air into the rooms and thereby containing the disease in the holding room itself. DirectiOnal air ?ow in this area was design to be accomplished via door undercuts. The design velocity through the different door undercut varies from 600 7 00 fpm; creating a high pressure drop. recommends the velocities of 200 with maximum of no more than 300 fpm. Existing exhaust fans never delivered the design CFM. The fans run in parallel and are 23% short 0n capacity. If one fan fails system static pressure can?t he maintained and areas that are critically designed to be negative become positive. At some time after the building was built door sweeps were installed on doors in the animal holding area and on the doors from the clean corridor to the procedure room per direction from did not want varmints? escaping through the undercuts. Door sweeps were not put on the anteroom doors to the procedure room. Addin door sweeps created more pressure dr0p and further blocked the directional air ?ow path that was problematic from the beginning. ARE has recently requested that the anteroom doors to the procedure room also have sweeps installed. To allow for directional air flow the glass in the doors will be replaced with tempered glass that will have a I (?nal sloth from clean corridor to re vet to he determined) ?tell-tale? slot. The door Wild: has been caulked and sealed and this door will be ermanently remove our and replace with a wall and a window. Elevator lobby, (room becomes unstable when elevator doors open. Elevator lobbies should be pressurized and this one t' remove exhaust grille from this room to resolve issue. I Air from clean corridor is on. This is causing the disru anterooms in corridor tibil3t42 is sucked into the incinerator room when the incinerator tion of air ?ow into the procedure rooms and the The proposed scope to accomplish this project is as follows: P2009453: HVAC Mod. (basins use. 252m) Roybal 1112:2010 Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate MECHANICAL: l. 2453??" 10. ll. 12. 13. ARCHITECTURAL I. 2. Provide baseline test of exhaust and supply grilles and pressure differential across doors. Measure exhaust static pressure at inlet and outlet of existing exhaust fans (exams use OHS to remove hepa ?lters and deeon existing to be demolish duetwork. After decon is accomplished contractor to demolish existing exhaust grilles, ductworlr and all associated devices. Cap existing ductwork at tie into main trunk. Tap into existing Supply air ductwork in interstitial space and route 4 . network to existing phoenix supply valve (turn existing exhaust valve around and insulate). Tap into existing hot water pipes and route new pipe to new reheat coil. Provide all associated controls and devices to make a complete supply system. Insulate supply ductwork' and hot water pip e. All devices and equipment to match existing equipment and devices. Provide revised control programming to the BAS. Use existing exhaust slab openings for new supply duct connection to new supply stainless steel diffusers; reuse existing deeon exhaust gas tight dampers. seal between slab and ductworlt. Provide new control thermostat to match existing thermostats. Provide paintable silicone to seal around diffuser plenum boxes in corridor. Add new stainless steel supply grille in womeni'men shower staging area to pressurize space. Remove existing exhaust grille elevator lobby room to pressurize space and patch per architectural requirements. Rebalanee entire air handler and associated exhaust fans to new airflows. Balance of system to take place at the diffuser; attempt to balance system via duet traverse is unacceptable due to turbulent air flow. Test and Balance water systems. Add new stainless steel supply grille to corridor adjacent to incinerator r0 pressurize space. This will require tapping into ductwork of and routing of new ductwork and penetrating slab of interstitial space. Add new stainless steel Innlv a "lie to locker room anteroom. This will require tapping into ductwork of WEE and routing new duetwork. Fan failure test for fans tblt3l-?42 to be done by assisted by BFO and test and balance contractor. - Safety test at completion of the project to be done by OHS and BFO assisted by the test and balance contractor. :42 Remove and retain door U231 25 including door, frame and related hardware. Fill wall opening created by removal of door tblt3li42 Iwith concrete masonry; provide and install new window in this wall. ?ill-3V? 2523i") use. 252ath {bll3ji42 U.S.C. 252301} 3. {enema Provide and install new concrete masonry wall in Corridor p21 create - new Ante Room between Corridor USE. and Decon Room USE. air-19mm Gaogrhi IQ P2009453: HVAC Mod. use. 252mm Roybal l! 12f2010 Scope of Work and Confirmation Estimate 4. . . (bll3l-?42 . . Rein ate HM door it r" 9 to new masonry wall in Corndor including frame and all hardware. Clean door, frame and hardware of all sealants, re?nish door as necessary, to match existing HM doors in Corridor. Finish new masonry walls to match existing, including epoxy floor 8: base and epoxy paint. Provide and install stainless Steel ca at opening created by demolition of ductwork in me Seal edges and fasteners to gas~tight condition; method per approval of OHS. Remove directional air flow ?ping-pong? indicator devices from doors. Install manufacturer supplied caps to resulting penetrations in walls. Seal caps and fasteners to gas-tight condition. The following doors are to receive this work: (b?3y42 uses 252mm g?ll?I-I ggnwegssremswpae- F- reaswnp-nwe eaes on (bll3}:42 use. 252mm P2009453: HVAC Mod.i Roybal 11'12fl?l? Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate 8. Provide and install new Continuous rubber door sweeps at doors. Sweeps to be face mounted on door leafs. Seal edges and fasteners to gas?tight condition. The following doors are to receive this work: 2L use. 252mm (tarsus: $33.42 J. New door I c: s. as at new wall near the use. Shower Out area. 9. Remove and d'sgm ?e of glass within windows at doors. Provide and 'b new clear tempered inch glass at doors. Glass to be sized such that a l. i. inch glass remains on one vertical edge of the resulting assembly. Provide ribbon type directional air ?ow indicator within glass opening. Seal edges and fasteners to gas?tight condition. The following doors are to receive this work: use. 262a use. 2s2arm P2009453: HVAC Mod. Roybal 11"12i?2010 Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate use. 03- 252::th dd. 66. ff. ss- hh. 11. ii- kk. 11. [111. 10. Remove and dispose of glass in existing door it as . Provide and install new tempered clear glass within exisring window frame. Glass to be sized to ?ll entire frame with no slot or opening to remain. Seal fasteners and edges to gas-tight condition. PGO ACQUISTION STRATEGY: During the Con?rmation Estimate process the following additional information has been de?ned: Int-r? :12 US Cl 5? EEZaih 1. Project location: Floors lRoybal Campus. 2. Assumption of project type: Rciid 3. Program requirements: 4. Complexity of the project: Complex 5. Involvement of OHS, FMEO, ARE, CCID, ITSO and other support groups as required. I 6. Time constraints by Programivision. 7. Anticipated construction method: 8A 8. Schedule: TED Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely. Karen M. Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clilton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 work: 770-483-830? cell: 404-825-682? fax: WG-48 8-266? P2009453: HVAC Mod. U.s.c. 2525::th Ruybal Scope of Work and C0111 irmation Estimate 1112,0010 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 1:35 PM To: Nathaniel HowardI William (Bill) no:-iE' Probst, Paul E. Zambuto, Laura K. Campbell. John Michael (Mike) Ford, Maria Cristina Williams Allison Nogueira, William P. (cocrocoorsFO)ocrommcezro) Cc: Lingler, Subject: anc Meelibii3i-42 January an Meeting Minutes El All, Attached are my meeting notes from our January 6th meeting. Please let me know if you have any corrections or additions. P2009453 - anc Mod .. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 7?0-488-830? Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: email: Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFC. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results 1will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey .hSEavIce I e" 3 is. ownerInSAFER - NIEETING MINUTES Center for Disease Control and Prevention Date: January 6, 2009 . (exam: use. HVAC Modi?catlon gszaw Subject: P2009453 mama us 0 {b3(3}i42 Location: 2623!?: - Conference Room c: r? a Attendees: Karen Moss DEMO Laura Zambuto - CCID Paul Probst FMEO Christine Ford FMECI Mike Campbell - CIMO Bill Howard OHS Dr. Allison Williams ARE Dr. Nate Powell ARE ma? a: we 5 252m. OHS Paul Nogueira numnse of this one ting was for OHS to discuss with ARE the HVAC Modi?cations (enema use. 262a Per current airflow l?t? 5 2533 does not follow proper hiocontainment procedures. Fort Collins air?ow was reversed as is requested in this project. By reversing this airflow personnel could exit one animal holding room and put Tyvex on in the ?gray? corridor and then enter another animal holding room with out having to shower. 3. ARE stated their procedures would not change; they would continue to change PPE and shower between programs. 4. Dr. Powell asked what the procedure moved into the ?gray? corridor. I . replied that the procedure would not change. The cages would he surface decontaminated by spraying it down while weari the PPE and lastly spray PPE. I. Powell asked how personnel would know that dirty cages were in the corridor. rotoeol would be when dirty cages are personnel do not get put at risk. 6. Dr Powell asked for a risk assessment to be written by OHS. Dr. Powell has monumental concerns about this coordination procedure and the procedures . stated the shelving in the ?gray? corridor was intended for storage of can . 8. Dr. Powell asked which is more ?gray?; the corridor or the antcroom to the shower area. replied the corridor is considered to be the ?gtayest?. 9. Laura Zambuto stated that this air ?ow directional change is an advantage to because this would enable them to move equipment from one room to another and eliminate the requirement for redundant equipment. They could move Ilinment from one room to another room; but not to different labs such as 334g 2 10. Dr. Powell asked for minutes of this meeting to be given to Dr. Black. I 11. Dr. Powell asked the select agent be noti?ed as soon as possible about the change in the procedure and that they review the procedure. Select agent would want sequence of operations to be written by OHS. (?3:42 12. Dr William ask could be built between the Use. 262st and animal holding. eplied that would be too expensive. ARB procedures would change if an anteroom existed. 13. Karen Moss stated that air?ow from de-con room into ray corridor could not be guaranteed since there would be no future exhaust in ?gray? corridor. The decision was made to build an anteroom to the de-con room. Air would ?ow from secondary entry into de~con room and from the new ante room into de-con room. 14. When the incinerator is ?red air from clean corridorW is sucked into the incinerator room; disrupting the air ?ow into the procedure and anterooms off this clean corridor. The incinerator issue needs to be resolved along with this project. was okay with adding a diffuser to corridor between the clean. corridor and incinerator room. 15. Outage ate to sliu to May; Laura Zambuto to con?rm dates. Also need to check with the 252a programs about Upcoming andfor ongoing projects. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEPI From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, January 12. 2010 5:0? PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William (CDCIQC IBFOI Subject: P2009453 - .HVAC Modi?cations to Bil-:3 Corridor - Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Work Team. Please see attached Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Work. 1 :009453_Confirmatic Estimate. . . Regards, Karen Moss FEE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 4014-3256432? Fax: 770-488-255? email: Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey: and tell us about your recent experiences with BFC. This survey is for intemal CDC use only and the results will be Used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey u.s.c. aszath; P2009453: HVAC Mod. Roybal 11123010 Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate To: Tanya Charles Daniels Art Lingler Paul Nogueira Paul Probst Reference: Project P2009453 Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate The Con?rmation Estimate for the above referenced project is >$100,000 and $700,000. The project was requested by OHS due to a bio-containment issue. The milk l5 i ectional air .ow out of animal holding rooms is into a common corridor thigh? 1 allowing different type?s diseases to mix together which creates a personnel safety issue. The scope direction of air ?ow and to resolve the capacity issues with Exhaust Fans . The new air path shall be air into the animal holding rooms and thereby containing the disease in the holding room itself. Directional air ?ow in this area was design to be accomplished via door undercuts. The design velocity through the different door undercut varies from 600 - 700 fpm; creating a high pressure drop. ASHRAE recommends the v=locities of 200 with maximum of no more than 300 fpm. Existing exhaust fans never delivered the design CFM. The fans run in parallel and are 23% short on capacity. if one fan tails system static pressure can?t be maintained and areas that are critically designed to be negative become positive. At some time after the building was built door sweeps were installed on doors in the animal holding area and on the doors from the clean corridor to the procedure room per direction from MALAC did not want varmints? escaping through the undercuts. Door sweeps were not put on the anteroom doors to the procedure room. Adding door sweeps created more pressure drop and further blocked the directional air ?ow path that was problematic from the beginning. ARE has recently requested that the anteroom doors to the procedureroom alsohave sweeps installed: To allow for directi nal air ?ow the glass in the doors willbe replaced with tempered glass that will have a (if? .. (final slot his et to be determined) ?tell-tale? slot. The door from clean corridor I has been caulkcd and sealed and this door will be ermanentiy remove door and replace with a wall and a window._ Elevator lobby, (room I becomes unstable when elevator doors open. Elevator lobbies should be pressurized and this 0 . . =mo ve exhaust grille from this room to resolve issue. Air from clean corridolj'bj 3:324; sucked into the incinerator room when the incinerator is on. This is causing the disruption of air ?ow into the procedure rooms and the anterooms in corrido I '3 USE. The proposed scepe to accomplish this project is as follows: P2009453: HVAC i iezaim Roybal lamina Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate MECHANICAL: l. 953??" 10. ll. 12. 13. 'Provide baseline test of exhaust and Supply grilles and pressure differential across doors. Measure exhaust static pressure at inlet and outlet of existing exhaust fans use. OHS to remove hepa ?lters and decon existing to be demolish ductwork. After decon is accomplished contractor to demolish existing exhaust grilles, ductwork and all associated devices. Cap existing ductwork at tie into main trunk. Tap into existing supply air ductwork in interstitial space and route evg ructwork to existing phoenix supply valve (turn existing exhaust valve around in?: and insulate). Tap into existing hot water pipes and route new pipe to new reheat coil. Provide all associated controls and devices to make a complete supply system. Insulate supply ductwork and hot water pipe. All devices and equipment to match existing equipment and? devices. Provide revised control programming to the BAS. Use existing exhaust slab openings for new supply duct connection to new supply stainless steel diffusers; reuse existing decon exhaust gas tight dampers. seal between slab and ductwork. Provide new control thermostat to match existing thermostats. Provide paintable silicone to seal around diffuser plenum boxes in corridor. Add new stainless steel supply grille in womenfmen shower staging area to pressurize Space. {13) Remove existing exhaust grilleelevator lobby room (at: to pressurize Space and patch per architectural requirements. Rebalance entire air handler and associated exhaust fans to new airflows. Balance of system to take place at the diffuser; attempt to balance system via du ct traverse is unacceptable due to turbulent air ?ow. Test and Balance water systems. Add new stainless steel supply grille to corridor adjacent to incinerator to to pressurize space. This will require tapping into ductwork of (cigar: and routing of new ductworlc and penetrating slab of interstitial space. Add new stainless steel smolLEtiHe to locker room anteroorn. This will require tapping into duetwork @1334? and routing new ductwork. Fan failure test for fans to be done by assisted by BFO and test and balance contractor. Safety test at completion of the project to be done by OHS and BFO assisted by the test and balance contractor. ARCI-HTECTUR AL 1. 2. L11 Remove and retain doo including door frame and related hardware. Fill wall opening created by removal of door Iwirh concrete masnnw' provide and install new window in this wall. ?it-42 ?3 i 2523'?? USE. 262mb) Provide and install new concrete masonry wall in Corridor b' 3' 142 U. to create new Ante Room between Corridor {blt33l42 and Bacon Room (blt3ll42 Ill-21'" 59F: 0:20-5th P2009453: HVAC Mod. {exams use. 252m) Roybal 123910 Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate 4. (D) lay-3' 42 us -- r- a :42 rate existing HM door ?25 including frame and an narcwa to new masonry wall in Corrido . a. Clean door, frame and hardware of all sealants, re?nish door as necessary, to match existing HM doors in Corridor. Finish new masonry walls to match existing, including epoxy floor base and epoxy paint. Provide and install stainless steel cap at ceiling/slab opening created by demolition of duetwork in room Seal edges and fasteners to gas?tight condition; method per approval of OHS. Remove directional air ?ow ?ping-pong? indicator devices from doom. Install manufacturer supplied caps to resulting penetrations in walls. Seal caps and fasteners to gas-tight cond'tion. The following doors are to receive this work: thud} 42 HE: ?2El2alh': Pea-"eves; car's-ewe we so are P2009453: HVAC Modl?m?a? :42 0.3.0. 2523i?) iRoyb?l Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate 1!12f2010 8. Provide and install new continuous rubber door sweeps at doors. Sweeps to be face mounted on door leafs. Seal edges and fasteners to gas-tight condition. The following doors are to receive this work: were he so are use. 2625: IJ [Bi-'12 j. New door a. at new wall near the ?ihower Out area. 9. Remove and di clear tempered m. glass remains on one vertical edge of the resulting assembly. Provic snore of glass within windows at doors. Provide and install new inch glass at doors. Glass to be sized such that a I. inch ?1 type directional air flow indicator within glass opening. Seal edges and fasteners to gas-tig] "1t condition. The following doors are to receive this work: a. {b;(31242 use. 2525: {hi P2009453: HVAC ?55 252? Royhal 1112:2010 Scope of Work and Co :irmation Estimate {mic-ma 262athmovmpm'e-orglass in existing door ?lial?: m? Provide and install new inch tempered clear glass within existing wmitoiv Hame. Glass to be sized to ?l entire frame with no slot or opening to remain. Seal fasteners and edges to gas-tight condition. PGO ACQUISTION STRATEGY: During the Continuation Estimate process the following additional information has been de?ned: Project location: Floorsl Assumption of project type: Program requirements: Complexity of the project: Complex Involvement of OHS, MO, ARE, CCID, ITSO and other support groups as required. Tinie constraints by Program: To be set by the Anticipated construction method: 8A 8. Schedule: TBD US C: 262arh: Roybal Campus. wewwr :49 Please contact me if you have any questiCins. Sincerely, Karen M. Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers tor Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta= Georgia 30333 work: ??0-483-330? cell: 404-825-582? fax: 77'0-488-285? (bHiaazcu use. 252a{m P2009453: HVAC Mad. Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate Roybal UIZIZOIU Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Everyone, The attachment is for Mike,? CampbelI, John Michael (Mike) Friday. January 15, 2010 12:23 PM Knob, Stephen H. Prebst. Paul (encroeeoreFO); Noguetra, William P. Ford, Marta Cristina Walpole, Kenneth K. Phillips. Roman (CDCIOCDOIBFO CT 4 CDC Pressure Survey (bit3J-?42 USE. 262a{h) and the results of the adjustments made last week. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) .. Campbell. John Michael (Mike) (CDCIOCOOIBFO) From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Everyone, The attachment is for P2009674, Mike. Friday, January 15. 2010 12:23 PM Koob. Stephen H. Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Ford, Maria Cristina Walpole. Kenneth K. Phillips. Roman (CTR) {b?3y42 IPreseure Sunre Ll 5.0. 2EEaih} use. 252mm and the results of the adjustments made last week. Page 0302 U.S.C. 262mb} Page 0303 U.S.C. 262mb] Page 0304 USE. 262mb) Page 0305 11.3.0. 262a(h) Page 0306 USE. 262mb) Page 0307 use. 262a(h} Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 1:59 PM To: Walpole. Kenneth K. I Subject: FW: P2009453 HVAC Modi?cations to Con?rmation Estimate and Scope of Work F?t?l Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCDDIBFU) Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 5:07 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Linglenr Arthur R. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIUCDDIB I?ilogueira.r William P. I . I Subject: P2009453 HVAC Modi?cations Team, Please see attached Confirmation Estimate and Scope of Work. :0 09453_Confirrnatic Estimate. . . Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 4104?8256322! Fax: email: KMoss Please visit Eith Customer Satisfaction ?urveg and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will he used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey {blt3ii42 use. P2009453: HVAC Mod. 262mm r, Bugging Raybal I Inna 10 Scope of Work and Confirmation Estimate To: Tanya Charles Daniels Art Lin gler Paul Nogueira Paul Probst Reference: Project P2009453 Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate The Confirmation Estimate for the above referenced project is 345100.000 and {$700,000. The project was requested by OHS due to a bio-containment issue. The current directional air flow out of animal holding rooms is into a common con?idor (??3142 U-S-C- allowing different type?s diseases to mix together which creates a personnel safety issue. The scope is to reverse the direction of air ?ow and to resolve the capacity issues with Exhaust Fans . The new air path shall be air into the animal holding rooms and thereby contm 1e disease in the holding room itself. Directional air flow in this area was design to be accomplished via door undercuts. The design velocity through the different door undercut varies from 600 700 fpm; creating a high pressure drop. ASHRAE recommends the locities if 200 with maximum of no more than 300 fpm. Existing exhaust fans never delivered the design CFM. The fans run in parallel and are 23% short on capacity. If one fan fails system static pressure can?t be maintained and areas that are critically designed to be negative become positive. At some time after the building was built door sweeps were installed on doors in the animal holding area and on the doors from the clean corridor to the=procedure room per direction from did not want varmints? escaping through the undercuts. Door sweeps were not put on the anteroom doors to the procedure room. Adding door sweeps created more pressure drop and further blocked the directional air flow path that was problematic from the beginning. ARB has recently requested that the anteroom doors to the procedure room also have sweeps installed. To allow for direct' ir flow the glass in the doors will be replaced with tempered glass that will have a (final slot has et to be determined) ?tell-tale" slot. The door from clean corridor to @9214? {mi-3134a A has been caulked and sealed and this door will be ermanently remove door and replace with a wall and a window. Elevator lobby, (room becomes unstable when elevator doors open. Elevator lobbies should be pressurized and this on {?31333 ?ernove exhaust grille from this room to resolve issue. Air from clean corridor 1' c: r; is sucked into the incinerator room when the incinerator is on. This is causing dis" ption of air flow into the procedure rooms and the . . (30111de 1:32:42 The proposed scope to accomplish this project is as follows: P2009453: HVAC Mod. use. 262a(h} ll 1212010 Roybal Scope of Work and Confirmation Estimate MECHANICAL: l. [u 749??" 9" l0. . Add new stainless steel 51 . Fan failure test for fans Provide baseline test of exhaust and supply grilles and pressure differential across .xhaust static pressure at inlet and outlet of existing exhaust fans use. OHS to remove hcpa ?lters and decon existing to be demolish ductwork. After decon is accomplished contractor to demolish existing exhaust grilles. ductworlt and all associated devices. Cap existing ductwork at tie into main trunk. Tap into existing supply air ductworlt in interstitial space and route new ductwork to existing phoenix supply valve (tum existing exhaust valve around and insulate). Tap into existing hot water pipes and more new pipe to new reheat coil. Provide all associated controls and devices to make a complete supply system. Insulate supply ductwork and hot water pipe. All devices and equipment to match existing equipment and devices. Provide revised control programming to the BAS. Use existing exhaust slab openings for new supply duct connection to new supply stainless steel diffusers; reuse existing decon exhaust gas tight dampers. seal between slab and ductwork. Provide new control thermostat to match existing thermostats. Provide paintable silicone to seal around diffuser plenum boxes in corridor. Add new stainless steel supply grille in womenfmen shower staging area to pressurize space. Remove existing exhaust grille elevator lobby room patch per architectural requirements. Rebalancc entire air handler and associated exhaust fans to new air?ows. Balance of sysuzm to take place at the diffuser; attempt to balance system via duct traverse is unacceptable due to turbulent air ?ow. Test and Balance water systems. Add new stainless steel supply grille to corridor adjacent to incinerator room to pressorize space. This will require tapping into ductwork of (bll3lf42 and routing of new ductwork and penetrating slab of interstitial space. ar'lle to locker room anteroom. This will require ?lbl and routing new ductwork. Ito be done by FMEO: assisted by BFO and test lb) Jli'l to pressurize space and tapping into ductwork o' RC and balance contractor. . Safety test at completion of the project to be done by OHS and BFO assisted by the test and balance contractor. ARCHITECTURAL l. 2. 3. Remove and retain door (bll3li42 including door. frame and related hardware. Fill wall opening created by removal of door @914? with concrete masonry; orovide and install new window in this wall. use. 252mm use. 252a(h) wu-uruv Provide and install new concrete masonr wall in Corridorlusc. ?2 Ito create new Ante Room between Corridor (bll3li42 and Decon Room lbll3ii42 use. 26 P2009453: HVAC Mod. I. Roybal 1x12212010 Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate one :42 . 2 4. Relocate HM door i . to new masonry wall 1n Corridor an including frame and all hardware. Clean door, frame and hardware of all sealants, re?nish door as necessary, to match existing HM doors in Corridor. 5. Finish new masonry walls to match existing, including epoxy ?oor base and epoxyr paint. 6. Provide and install stainless stee. can at ceiling/slab opening created by demolition of ductwork in room Seal edges and fasteners to gas-tight condition; method per approval of OHS. Remove directional air flow ?ping-pong? indicator devices from doors. install manufacturer supplied caps to resulting penetrations in walls. Seal caps and fasteners to gas-tight condition. The following doors are to receive this work: {b}{3}142 USE. 262a P20 09453: HVAC Mod. LLSC. Scope of Work and Con?rmation Estimate I Roybal 1l12f2010 8. Provide and install new continuous rubber door sweeps at doors. Sweeps to he face mounted on door leafs. Seal edges and fasteners to gas-tight condition. The following doors are to receive this work: remains use. 63' 262mm new rho so 13'? . I3 3:42 J: Newdoorthi?i at new wall near the 9. Remove and di lb} I3ii42 Ill" Shower Out area. ;e of glass within windows at doors. Provide and install new clear tempered inch glass at doors. Glass to be sized such that a to 1.5 inch glass remains on one vertical edge of the resulting assembly. Provide ribbon type directional air ?ow indicator within glass opening. Seal edges and fasteners to gas-tight condition. The following doors are to receive this werlt: use. 2525: {hi Fri?. . P2009453: HVAC Mod. U-S-C- 262m Scope of Work and Cog?rmation Estimate cc. 26284?!) 11. I'll] on 00 10. move and dispose of glass in existing door I Roybal (bii33142 use. see Provide and install new inch tempered clear glass within existing window frame. Glass to be sized to fill entire frame with no slot or opening to remain. Seal fasteners and edges to gas-tight condition. PGO AC QUISTION STRATEGY: During the Con?rmation Estimate process the following additional information has been defined: - . I Ibndi42 USE ?2 J23Ihl 1. location: Floors 2. Assumption of project type: RM 3. Program requirements: 4. Complexity of the project: Complex 5. required. Anticipated construction method: 8A Schedule: TED Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Karen M. Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Fload N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 work: WEI-4836307 cell: 404-825-3827 fax: 7?0-488-266? Roybal Campus. Involvement of OHS, FMEO, ARE, CCID, ITSU and other support groups as Time constraints by Program: To be set by the in?uenza division. P2009453: HVAC Mod. use, 252a(m Scope of Work and Confirmation Estimate Roybal 1f12f2010 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Sent: Monday, January 11. 2010 1:01 PM To: Walpole, 00! Subject: P2009453 ?331.3142 UIS-C- ans Attachments: 20100111? .p Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1500 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-438-330? Cell: 404-325-6827 Fax: 770-433-266? email: KMoslecdcgov (bll3134? U-S-C- Sequence and other info. Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal an contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 12:50 PM To: Moss, Karen Subject: This E-mail was sent from {Aficio NIP C3000). Scan Date: 01.11.2010 12:50:26 (#0500) Page 0315 use. 262a(h} Page 031? USE. 262mb) Page 0818 {busy-.42 use. 262a(h} Page 0819 262a(h} Page 0820 {mm-.42 use. 262a{h) Page 0821 {mist-42 1.1.3.0. 262a(h) Page 0822 {bust-42 use. 262a?hj Page 0823 {bust-42 use. 262a{h} Maths. Chester From: Sent: Subject: EF-5 0.30. 262ath (bif3ir4'2 0.3.0. Karen Moss F. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: lCell: 404-825-6312? Fax: ??0-438-265? email: {aged ca, ov Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Monday? January 11. 2010 12:49 PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K400019010 RE: Updated: P2009453 List? (system use HVAC Mod 252mm Q?n?lh- Please visit EIFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCDDIBFO) Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 12:46 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOD BFO Proost, Paul E. Subject: RE: Updated: P2009453 W33 '42 HVAC Mod L130 LIE C: What are the EF's and AHU's that you want to test? From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 11:43 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Subject: FW: Updated: P2009453 anc Mod 2525mm enneth K. (bif3i;42 use. 5 See below froCan we simulate fan failure wilh suppiy fan tracking exhaust? That is slow down the supply fan if one exhaust fan fails to maintain system static pressure. Karen Mass P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ??0-433-830? Cell: 404-025-6132? Fax: 7?0-438-2667 email: Klvtos sl@cdc.goy Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. 1 This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. 000 Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Front: . . II we Itll-I?} [kcocrocooronso S?nt: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 l:21 PM I To: Moss, Karen Campbell, John Michael (Mike) b?quc: Howard, William (Bill)( DIOHSJ I "stair. tibia-tic? . . . RE: Mod All, It is my understanding that the two exhaust fans for the vivarium are redundant, however they are undersized and we would go positive if we were to shut one fan down. We cannot take that risk with ongoing experiments. It is also my understanding that if you shut the supply off as a precaution to going positive and then shut one exhaust down then you really won't be getting a valid reading because you will be starving the fans for supply air. So at this time OHS is going to request that this testing not take place until the space has been decontaminated. Thanks From: Moss, Karen a Sent: 3.: . . A 05, 2010 5:43 PM To: . coo} as; . . . . ibva'az RE. Updated. P2009453 IanC Mod 1 5 35%! Slow, manual dampers are missing in the ductwork where needed so will need to have a few of those installed. See you tomorrow. I Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-488-8307 Cell: 404025-682? Fax: I Please visit BFO Customer Satisfagtign gurvey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFD. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC. Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: {coc,iocooroH5) Tuesday, January 05, 2010 2:50 PM To: Moss, Karen I U.S.C. Subject: Accepted: Updated: P2000451 262ath) When: Wednesday. JanLary 05, 2010 10:00 Air . rn Time (US Canada). Where: 20, lb} i?ll'sl?J' 2 Mathe, Chester From: Sent iLl?t'?: To: I I Subject: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Manda Februa 22, 2010 8:06 AM Jr" nchard, Thomas M. Barrett, Timothy J. $53543 4, I I Howard, William ii i - - qihii3ia? LLB-C- 2 (coerciomcezm); Massung, Robert Pe - a - (cDCiocochOSEP); Posey, James E. - Probst, Paul E. (cosiOCOOisFO); Sable, Suraj eessie M. (CDCIDSELSIP 2 - a - (coolocooilsFoi; Watts, Clark Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDINCIRD) RE: Meeting to discuss Vivarium project location changed f'h-i. (bl I Change location to Building 20, CONFERENCE Room, ON THE beloor CONFERENCE Room,- this is set i up better for a meeting environment instead of classrooml'training environment. Thanks. Karen From: . (coqcuomczveol sent: Thursday, Fetlruan.l 18, 2010 11:16 AM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Barrett, TIITIOUW J. (CDCJOD ,2 U53 5 Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocoor sessim . . . (coefocoorosepi- -.. .s. DC/cmomczveo), it (communicates),- (communique), I tie Pose James e. . . ro au . renal ihiial 0000 - - :w M. (mucus; In: - . ie, Kenneth K. (encrocooilerm; - [Etcoclocoorossise - (coerccromceocro); Zamtluto, Laura R. (CDCICCIDJNCIRDM - Subject: Meeting to decuss Vivarium project When: Tue -- - many 23, 2010 11:00 PM Eastern Time (US 31 Canada). that: . . conference room (located next to guard station] When: da February 23, 2010 11:00 Aim-12:00 PM Eastern Time (US Canada}. stat? . conference room (located next to guard station) Note: The GMT offset above does not re?ect daylight saving time adjustments. Maths, Chester (cocrocoorosem From: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: February 18, 2010 9:20 AM To: Probst. Paul E. Co: Daniels. Charles E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sub'ect: P2009453-m HVAC Mod (blt3ii42 I use. 252a Paul, Please elevate the above referenced project to FPAA status as the cost exceeds $1 1 0,000. Thanks, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 404-325-1532? Fax: email: KMoss Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction ?umev and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only.r and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted ernl?olr'ees are 10 participate in our survey Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2010 4:47 PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Fw: airflow reversal in bldg. vivarium Sent from my BlaokBerry Wireless Handheld From: Moss, Karen To: Black, Carolyn - -- Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOXBFD Milbv Ste hen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. I (cocrocoorOHsl; Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoorsFO) Sent: Thu Mar 18 16:45:00 2010 my Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. is; ivarium n. Tony, and Pat will have to verify but I believe they are out all next week in training. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 4046254382? Fax: email: From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursda March 18, 2010 4:44 PM To: (cocroro/chvso); Moss, Karen (CoqocoorsFO); Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocoorol-lS); Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO Mile Stel'len C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (cocrocooreria) a, Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. is vivan?um Thanks, Tony! 1 would be very pleased to participate and learn more. Carolyn From: ea (CDC/OIo/chvso) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:37 PM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn ;-Milb Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. Paul Eire (cocrocoorsFO) ,m Subject: RE: air flow reversal in hldg.vivarium All. A meeting to go over the options to redirecting the air ?ow is desperately needed. I believe that a solution can be (or has arrived at. A Monday meeting would be very helpful to move this forward. ibli?l From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursda March 18, 2010 4:04 PM To: @333 Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Milby, Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. CIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: air ?ow reversal in bldg.vivarium Please see below correspondence. As the POC for the HOG. its important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached file is an updated air?ow diagram from what I have seen in the past. The anteroorn to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroom {green area} to the shower area is a concern from an engineering standpoint. because air will not flow as indicated in the diagram when the airflow is reversed Also there are some concerns mentioned in Steve Milby's e-mail that are not are either the directive or the attached diagram Regards. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Demgn Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta Georgia 30333 . mitt ma}? 4 I .l"'Jlli i1.' - . Ema? 11' From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2010 10:58 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen (cociocooieFO);CDCi0C00i0HS); Blanchard. Thomas M- Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David Milby, Stephen C. Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. vivarium Dr. Black, I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the proje request that was submitted to BFO. Please let me know if you have any questions that we can answer. and I will be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issue. Thank You. William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Office of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 678.614.?25? wch3@cdc.gov From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:39 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. Cc: Moss, Karen (encrocoorsFO); coprocoorom); Howard, William (Bill) (coo/ocooroHS); Blanchard, Thomas M. Janet (CDCIOIDKOD) Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. ivarium 42 Thank you for this thoughtful response. Steve. Biil, Karen: would one or more of you be able to provide us with a diagram showing the direction of the air flows after the proposed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below in Steveis email including the changing area at the end of the hallway? Once we all have this information, perhaps a meeting to go over the information would be helpful? i understand that you all have already spent a lot of time discussing this but i would appreciate your clarification on the air flow directions for my own understanding. This information is needed to support efforts on the part of DSR staff to prepare new SOPs for the animal husbandry tasks. Thanks, Carolyn From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:25 AM To: Black, Carolyn (CDCIOIDINCPD I Cc: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bidg. ivarium Dr. Black, Howard, William (Bill) (sociocooronsy I would be happy to talk to you and share what i have heard if you would liite. This is obviously a complex issue and your question is a good one. My understanding is that the most recent plan is to make the central corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anterooms. According to Karen Moss, the DEMO engineer responsible for the project, there has been no final direction on how pressure in the central corridor would relate to the changing area. She also has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the clean side of the cage decontamine indie-Iloclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the West side. it might be helpful for you to speak to Karen, Bill Howard or about the ?nal direction on these questions, There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms if SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding rooms support protections against cross contamination from the central corridor back into other holding rooms, if the issue of turbulence at the holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and if the pressure relationships between the central corridor and the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal opinion is that the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor should remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas, even if the central corridor is positive to the holding rooms, Karen is trying to understand and coordinate all of the ive se thoughts on this issue, and is more knowledgeable about the current status of the discussions than I am. Bill an would also be good sources of information for you. support the need to have the views of the ARB staff that work in the area be heard, and that proper-SDPs be developed to match any changes to the airflow in this area to make sure that working protocols reflect the new conditions. Thanks, Steve From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 3:42 AM To: Milhy, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Subject: air flow reversal in E13342 vivariurn Importance: High Hello. Steve: 1 have been discussing'this issue with several people within and outside of my division and was hoping you could answer a question for us. After the proposed air flow reversal in the vivarium is accomplished, what will be the status of the changing rcomlshower area that is at the end of the hallway that is now "dirty" but will become "gray" with the airflow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative with respect to the ?gray? hallway? Thanks very much1 - Carolyn Cn rai'yn M. Mack, Pint). Director Division of Scientific Resources National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic infectious Diseases CDC (404] 53943455 (404) 539-2155 fax chlaclt@odo.gov Ih?t?: . iil?latheI Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: To: Williams Allison Barrett, Timothy J. (coercioiucezm); Damon Iner K. cocrororucezrcl- Howard William (Bill) (cocrocoorosuel; {more use. :ocroromcezm); (blew USC- 2525 :42 U-S-C-s (coerciorncmo); Massung, [bjr3142 US [3 2E2ath. one ames cpcrocoorosrsp); - (CDCIOIDINCEZID - robst Paul E. - iocoorOSEP}; Valle, Bessie M. (CDCIOSELSIPHITP i Walpole. (enneth K. Watts, Clark (cocrocoollosep); (more: US-C- Zambuto, Laura R. mm RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Subject: -v I did not take this outside the realm of the HOG. While not a member of the HOG. OHS team lead, Dr. Holmes, expressed an interest in hearing the discussions regarding the options that were to be presented by BFD. And as this was a special meeting requested by me, i extended him an invitation to hear those discussions. Perhaps, the new OHS Director, should have the opportunity to review all options before moving forward with the directive issued by the Acting Director. I understand from the OHS announcement that he has a very extensive background in the area of containment. . 'b :42 . . Further, I am unclear of the schedule mentloned below. Both programs, a 25 have Indicated they need a 3 month notification regarding the start date in order to close out experiments. Both programs indicated that starting after the previously agreed July start is not an issue for them. So there is no delay of programs if this project is not started in July as described below. Also a risk assessment is needed to assess risk to staff at the soiledi'grey interface. A risk assessment is also needed to determine how contamination of animals with agents potentially blown in from the soiled corridor will be prevented. ARB has requested risk assessments from OHS and feels strongly that this project should not move fonivard without completing these assessments. Lastly, the information you present below as - a a of the ARBIOHS'meeting is _r_1_gt_what was agreed upon. Dr. Powell requested a written document, which - and Mr. Howard, both agreed they would provide. However, to date, it has not been provided. it was agreed that air reversal with a physical barrier was the way to proceed and that air reversal alone was not adequate. encourage all members to review the BFO meeting minutes. Sincerely. aw . From; I . use, 5252 Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 9:56 AM a To: Barrett, Timothy]. (coerce/oped); secrete/nomad); Damon Iner K. cocroIo/chvso); Howard William (Bill) (CDC/ocooroHs - WI (coo/ocoorossp); - - Messung, Robert CDC Pedone, James :42 use. a - 'Probst Paul E. (cociocoorsso); {enema .(cocrocoorosev); CDC (cncfocoolani: Valle. Fleas M. (CDCIOIDIOD) Walpole, Kenneth K. (cosiocoorsFO); Watts, Clark (coprocoorossp); U303 Williams, Allison [Eh-l: 4.: 1 Zambuto, Laura R. Subject: Fw: P2009453 - HOG Directive HOG members, You have been receiving Emails regarding recent decisions in the form of memos to Probst to move forward with the Vivarium air flow redirection project. I was informed that the OHS memo was a directive from OHS, that ARB (AV) took it outside the circle of the HOG, and as a result the acting OHS director has said this will be done at a minimum. The issue of anterooms/Bioaubbles is a completely separate topic. At the end of last week I solicited via Email a YES or NO response (appropriate primary reps) for a proposal that was supposedly arrived at by ARB and OHS (See Below): AN. FMEO has asked that the HOG and OHS provide direction regarding the Vivarium project We were no! abie to agree to a sohmon to the Issue of anieroom mstaiiah?on er (he iasi HOG meeting. our 3 separate meeting befween ARE and OHS to discuss r! rook piece Wire! came out of ma! rneenng was a proposal ro With the original pian of the am ?ow heat who the animal holding areas and to incinde a recommenderron {from ARB and Diner Programs) far (he rnsreiianon/use of Bror?uhbie conrarnmenr owners as an addrnonai raver ofprorecn'on Whai i need from you is to respond either YES (far HHS pmposai) or NO regains! this proposed if rhere is no men a memo will he sent out ME 0 to proceed accoro'rngiy Thanh-s? Note As of yet. if has not been determined where rhe funding fer the Bro-Bubble devices would come from. Regarding the outcome of this attempt to reach consensus, I received only 2 responses back one of which was a from Allison and sent to ?all?. That ended the proposal, which I suppose is why others did not respond. Since it was clear that a consensus was not possible, and in the interest of improving Vivarium safety and meeting DSAT requirements, I was compelled to move forward with the original HOG decision of simple redirecting the air flow. This keeps us on schedule, should not delay the programs, and installation of anterooms can still be considered in the future. If members have issue with my actions, please feel free to communicate that in the next HOG meeting. we also need to revisit how the HOG operates particularly outside involvement in this group?s deliberations and decision- making. U.S.C. 262a(h} From: USE-5 Sent: Frida March 12, 2010 8:45 AM Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive From: Wiiliams, Allison Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 8:03 AM To: Moss Karen (CDCIOCOOIBF manque/MHst -- - 3 :42 -- (cocxooiocsoy Darn rr Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive This is the First ARE has seen of this directive. How can the HOG deliver a directive without discussion and the consent of all members. Does our charter empower two individual members of the HOG to issue a directive without the knowledge and agreement of all? Following the meeting with BFO, OHS was in agreement with positively pressurized anterooms. During that meeting, the HOG was asked by the Deputy Director of BFO to discuss all options presented and come to a consensus. This has not been done. No agreem-p__ In HOG has been reached. A vote was solicited no less than a week ago today from Does anyone know the result of I- a Further, a motion was made for this discussion to agreed it would be addressed at that time. Ih?i?: This directive was issued without the knowledge of ARE, who has a voting voice on the HOG. Other HOG members, were you aware of this directive? Arel hg?tim.l "r ~~ml WW3 allowed to issue such a directive from the HOG without first discussing it with the members at a fully convened meeting of a quorum? I am not sure what is going on Ms. Moss. Perhaps the other members of the HOG were aware of this directive, however ARB was not and is not in full agreement with moving forward as outlined. Requests for a risk assessment of this and other options are still pending. Thank you for keeping all members in the loop. Sincerely, Allison williams From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursda March 11, 2010 5:08 PM . (b)i3i:42 u.s.c. 2523(h) . {bitBJ :42 USE. . co om - Damon Inger K. (cociororuczveo); - ZambutU. R. ibii3if42 I Powell, Nathaniel Cc: Blanchard, Thomas . Williams, Jeffery Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. Subject: P2009453 - HOG Directive Team, BFO recently received a signed directive from the HOG on 3110:2010. As project managerl am Cdigrective to you to ensure that each program memberfstakeholder is aware of this - 3 communication. Also. 2s2atn'a sent out a separate memo as well. I believe all members of the HOG received memo but! am not absoluter positive. Please see attached directive and memo and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. $5471? U-iifiI?JELiioa 44 File: Pro ject.doc 3 Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce; Cell: 44514-825532? Fax: email: KMess Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) USE. ?t2623lh3 From: Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 9:56 AM To: Barrett, Timothy J. oamen Inger Howard,William Bill] {siz42u. teitsizez - 262athi itcocrororncezro); {Di .1 - - ea Pedone, James . - bll3l;42 use. 262 PTO . . . (cocrocooitoser); - -- Valle, Bessie M. po e, ennet (cocrocooireroi; Watts, Clark {were u. Williams, Allison loosrorornd?lttl?i, Lomuuw, -aura R. Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive HOG members, You have been receiving Emails regarding recent decisions in the form of memos to Probst to move forward with the Vivarium air flow redirection project. I was informed that the 0H5 memo was a directive from OHS, that ARB (AV) took it outside the circle of the HOG, and as a result the acting OHS director has said this will be done at a minimum. The issue of anterooms/BioEubbles is a completely separate topic. At the end of last week I solicited via Email a YES or NO response (appropriate primary reps) for a proposal that was supposedly arrived at by ARE and OHS (See Below): Am FMEO has asked that the HOG and OHS provide direction regarding the 1ti?ivarium project. We were not able to agree to a solution to the issue of anteroom installation at the last HOG meeting, but a separate meeting between ARE and OHS to discuss it took place. What came out of that meeting was a proposal to continue with the original plan of reversing the air flow baclr into the animal holding areas and to include a recommendation (from ARE and other Progra ms) for the installationr?use of Bio-Bubble containment barriers as an additional level of protection. What i need from you is to respond either YES proposal) or NO {against this proposal), if there is no objection, then a memo will be sent out requesting FMEO to proceed accordingly. Thanks! Note: As of yet, it has not been determined where the funding for the Bio-Bubble devices would come from. Regarding the outcome of this attempt to reach consensus, I received only 2 responses back one of which was a from Allison and sent to ?all?. That ended the proposal, which I suppose is why others did not respond. Since it was clear that a consensus was not possible, and in the interest of improving Vivarium safety and meeting DSAT requirements, I was compelled to move forward with the original HOG decision of simple redirecting the air flow. This keeps us on schedule, should not delay the programs, and installation of anterooms can still be considered in the future. If members have issue with my actions, please feel free to communicate that in the next HOG meeting. We also need to revisit how the HOG operates particularly outside involvement in this groUp?s deliberations and decision? making. uses 2E2ain From: Sent: Frida Marc 12, 2010 8:45 AM I To: Mil Subject: Fw: P2009453 - HOG Directive From: Williams, Allison Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 8:03 AM To: Moss, Karen (coclocoolaro ;(coclom/nceoc1o - (WW U-Svc? (CDC/momma (win-.42 (bii3ii42U.S.C.? lcoczocooyosee); ibil?i (cocxocoolossp); Holmes, Davi I nothv .1. U-(coclocoolosep); Zambuto, Laura R. (coo/elomcmo); Powell, Nathaniel Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive This is the first ARB has seen of this directive. How can the HOG deliver a directive without discussion and the consent of all members. Does our charter empower two individual members of the HOG to issue a directive without the knowledge and agreement of all? Following the meeting with BFO, OHS was in agreement with positively pressurized anterooms. During that meeting, the HOG was asked by the Deputy Director of BFD to discuss all options presented and come to a consensus. This has not been done. No agreement from the H06 has been reached. A vote was solicited no less than a week ago today from Does anyone know the result of that vote? Further, a motion was made for this discussion to continue at the next HOG. agreed it would be addressed at that time. This directive was issued without the knowledge of ARE, wtgga?s a voting a: .- HOG. Other HOG members, were you aware of this directive? Are and allowed to issue such a directive from the H06 without first discussing it with the members at a fully convened meeting of a quorum? I am not sure what is going on Ms. Moss. Perhaps the other members of the HOG were aware of this directive, however ARB was not and is not in full agreement with moving forward as outlined. Requests for a risk assessment of this and other options are still pending. Thank you for keeping all members in the loop. Sincerely, Allison williams From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursda March 11, 2010 5:08 PM To: CDC/Olomcpocm); - (bii3ii42 uses (CDC/ocoolosem; (coclocooxossp); Holmes, David (coclocoolonsl; Barrett, Tlmothy J. (cocloolocsm; (coc om Damon, Inger K. 3 :42u.s.c. (coo/ocooxossp); Zambuto, Laura Hill I olomceoao) 2 Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Subject: P2009453 - HOG Directive Team. to you to ensure that each program memberl'stakeholder is aware of this recent communication. Also. slant BFO recently.r received a signed directive from the HOG on 3f10l2010. As project manager i am forwarding this directive out a separate memo as well. i believe all members of the HOG received not absgiitab' I Please see attached directive and memo and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. [13:13:42 File: HOG Directive 3-09-10.pdf File: MEMO Building use. Regards, 25 Project.doc Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K457 Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: WG-4 88?330? Cell: 404625632? Fax: Nil?435466? email: KMossl @cdcgov Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 3:39 PM To: Walpole. Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 HOG Directive Importance: High Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Chandler, George Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:42 PM To: Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Khabbaz, Rima Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCUDIOHS) Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Importance: High Jan I appreciate your concurrence. Ken. based on the OHS directive. with concurrence from the HOG. please proceed with the OHS Project Request. Thank you! (3, From: Nicholson, Janet Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:32 PM To: Chandler, George Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCIUCUDIOHS) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Khabbaz, Rima Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive To follow up on our converse I am in no position to overrule an expert opinion from OHS about the project to change the directional air flow in the i9; vivarium. From my understanding, this is the best solution to the address the issue of containment in the vivarium, given the circumstances (time. money, other alternative solutions). If needed. the .pv: 42Ll.sc.?2cearhi could be assembled to address the issue, but] would only do this if the issue could not be resolved in any other way. Jan Nicholson. OID From: Chandler, George Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:26 PM To: Gaunce, Jean A. Nicholson, Janet Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George (CDCIDCOOIBFD) Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive Jean and Jan: Please find attached a specific request from the HOG. si concerning a proiect request to address directional air flow in an area 0 . are familiar with the project. which is described in some detail in the attachments, and are aware of the apparent controversy surrounding the proposed solutions directional airflow change with or without anterooms, in the simplest terms]. I am e?mailing you for your concurrence or non?concurrence with the proposal in Directive - not that I am questioning the wisdom of the HOG at all it's simply that If there are major concerns that some views on this have not been heard I do not want to get a major change order in the middle of the Project, or to have the issue inadvertently escalate to the 12?" floor without making sure that opposmg views have been properly evaluated by the full HOG, or in accordance the HOG's approval charter I understand that a speedy resolution of this issue is quite important Just want to make sure that there is consensus on this or at least informed consent from the appropriate governance structure. Thanks? (3. Below (pdf fire) is the scanned copy of the directive signed mm an with I'm not sure if HOG members were recipients of this directive HOG members did receive a memo fromI??l later regarding the basis for design and construction of this project. I have attached it below. Than KS. Jeff cc File: MEMO Building mania-nae: File: HOG Directive 3?09?10.pdf All: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandler from HOG Manager to BFO with directive to install scope as described. Please note window of duration {July 3-24) that is being planned for shutdown of Vivarium to accommodate the construction effort. Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from CD, finalization of scope, market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG committee of current status. Than ks, Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir., Operations Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Methe, Chester (cociiocoolosee) From: Moss. Karen Sent: Wednesda March 10, 2010 5:01 PM TO: . (CDCIOIE (CDCIOEDINCF - . i I (cosmic: . - .(cocl'omliv .. - - {.bi3i342 H.305 . Blanchard, Thomas ivi. Holmes David Barrett. Timothy.' J. ; ibil3i:42 Damon, Inger K. =42 U-S-C- Zambuto. Laura R. .ibiiBi - Wal ole Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Howard, William (Bill) Williams. Jeffery Powell, Nathaniel Milby, Stephen c. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels Charles E. Tanya A. Keller. WW 6 - I mils: {Ka hi CDCIOIDINCEZID) aisle? .. ezoosess. .. HVAC Mod. Meeting Minutes 223.2010 All. Attached are the meeting minutes from our 242312010 meeting on the above referenced project. Please advised me ifvou have any additions or corrections to make. Engineering . Merl Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: message? Cell: 404-325?3332? Fax: arc-433-253? email: KMoss i @cdcgov Page 0843 {mm-.42 use. 252a(h; Page E3844 {mm-.42 use. 262a{h) Page 0345 use. 252.301) Page 0346 use. 252.3(th Page 084? (busy-42 use. 252mm Page 0848 (busy-42 use. Page 8849 USE. 252a(m SERVICE +9 .7, rm MEETING MINUTES Center for Disease Control and Prevention '5 ?Mm, ?3 4 '90 tn. Date: February 23, 2010 Subject: P2009453 ass 5 HVAC Modi?cation $35223? use. at Lo cation: Building 20 Attendees: Bill Howard - OHS Karen Moss DEMO us Laura Zambuto Dr. Allison Williams ARE CCID TB om anehard- BFO Dr. David Holmes OHS Dr. Nate Powell ARE Timoth Barrett CCID Russia: uses zszath. CCID Paul Probst FMEO Bill Howard OHS Jeff Williams BFO- OD Steve Milby - CIMO - The purpose of this meeting was for engineering to present the concept of anterooms to the programs. Torn Blanchard began the meeting with a slide presentation explaining the engineering needs of the physical barrier to control air ?ow. See attached presentation. I All stakeholders need to agree on a project of this magnitude. Up to this point all stakeholders have not agreed that just reversing the air?ow is the best way to go. 0 The air reversal project was agreed to go forward in a HOG meeting; but there was Ito-discussion that-took place as to how it would be executed; nothing was discussed if there was a need for" physical barriers or not; the concept only was agreed upon. 0 The disagreement between stakeholders came up when the talk-of anteroorns was introduced. The representative from OHS stated anterooms were not needed; which is why Dr. Williams invited Karen Moss and Tom Blanchard to meet with ARB to explain what the impact of the changes would be with or without the anterooms. OHS stated that whether an anteroom is needed or not is open for discussion and for review. Bottom line is the building can't continue to operate the way it is; part of it is safety and health: part of it is if the select agent finds out air is moving this direction they will shut the vivarium down. Consensus was that the select agent already knows this. According to 42 the CDC has been able to operate this way because of procedures, manual? of personal protective equipment. showering, etc.; and it is acknowledged this is not convenient, and certainly is not optimal and this is the reason why the HOG is looking for the continuation of this project. AA has seen hundreds of labs with anterooms and without anterooms. Without anterootns it is always a single pass in and out. Go through one room and shower out. The frequent showering is an issue for ARE as their technicians experience chafing of skin. Eb} . Anterooms are attractive to ARB andfor re-entry purposes without showertng in between. ARE will not change their operational procedures without an anteroom. The programs need to be consulted on when they can shutdown and for how long. According toI (has) I current design practice is 0ng away from the 3 :42 USE. - - - 3: USE. gii?giam Iscenano. The reason the building negative was the concern of cross contamination. From the engineers perspective the physical barrier of the anteroom would prevent the mixing of air between the corridor and the animal rooms. In order for this project to precede all stakeholders need to be in agreement to go forward with the air reversal and the potential way to achieve it. Karen?s responsibility is to help pull all stakeholders together in one agreement throughout the entire course of the project and to vent all possibilities over a very tight schedule. The current options are anterooms or no anterooms. The team needs to come up with a list of pros and cons. Engineering is only one aspect of this; input is needed from containment. front OHS. and from the programs on their concerns. - main concern is that the air in the corridor and the air in the animal holding room do not mix. Consensos was that the anteroom would need to have enough space to be functional for the programs and yet not take up to much area from the animal holding room. According to ARE the anterooms need to be big enough so that caging can be brought into the anteroom throu ah :he open animal holding door while the door from the anteroom to @3354? m. . closed. That is both doors should not be opened at the same time to move the cages into the corridor. Concerns were stated about not having anteroorns. I However, according to Doctor Powell the majority of Quarantine is separate from the main corridors in that the rooms are all into themselves and there are shower in shower out procedures. The vast majority of what is in is single corridor all BSLZ. I It was noted that buildingdoors swing inward; in the direction of airflow. at. Dr Powell and (?Hal brought up as an alternative to permanent construction of an anteroom. Any other suggestions from the programs should be sent to the engineers and safety. From program standpoint the issue has always been the air?ow direction. Their scientists don?t want to go into that facility because they don?t feel comfortable with the way it is currently designed. This was discussed in the HOG. and with OH I I that is what led to the air reversal project. The air reversal will satisfy It appears that the majority of the stakeholders would like to see an air reversal the question remains how it is best implemented. The dimensions (whether for an anteroom or biobbubble) will be based on the size of the cages. The programs need to be comfortable with the space left in animal holding for the number of cages they require. Some preference was express not to renovate with but do it right with masonry walls and with exhaust and supply coming from the house and not a separate unit. At this point two questions remain l) is it a deal breaker to just reverse the air without an anteroom or and 2) What are the major concerns with just reversing the air and who does that cause issues for? 2 in the animal use. 252a(h} (enema use. ARB's major concern is the potential for different agents minim holding area. ARE and all programs contribute to what is in the Cages are sprayed with disinfection before entering the According to ARE nothing is considered sterile until it comes out autoc ave. A cage that is sprayed can't be veri?ed that all organisms have been killed. OHS agrees that there is nothing quantitative about spraying it down; it depends on the how adequate ajob the person spraying is doing. As it stands now there is a stakeholder that has some concerns about cross contamination and something needs to be done to address that. The programs need to be investigated and a risk assessment needs to be done of what can be in that corridor at any given time. The procedures need to be adequate enough to ensure there is no cross contamination back into the animal holding area and that these procedures work for the programs and ARB. 0 OHS stated that the main priority is the safety of people. I According to 9mm ecerti?catiouf inspections will take place the later part of this year and the BMBL 5th edition will have to be adhered to. 0 ?ml-3V4? lstated that waste carted down the ?33342 . is a big issue; even if it is surfacesecon it is still wastesquirted but there is still infectious stuff in that bag. It is not considered clean by an}r stretch of the imagination and reversing the air flow is not addressing that issue at all. OHS mentioned that the negative anteroom does not solve cross contamination issue: because you are still rolling across the threshold; still going from the dirtiest Space across one threshold. When you change your PPE you are in the dirtiest space. lanai-aisusc According tol anterooms were pressurized to get air going in the opposite direction. The 'E?zl room was kept as the dirtiest space; go across one the threshold into ?soiled space? and then across another threshold into an essentially clean inner corridor. - Engineering stated that this could be done here and asked if the central room was negative and how is pressure in the anteroom maintained with the corridor positive? I said to talk to Steve Koob about how it was done. 4- Tom Blanchard mentioned that if the anteroom was positively pressurized it would seem as if the corridor would have to be negative. I Which OHS stated is fine as long as the anteroom is supplied with clean air. ARE agreed that scenario would be also be fine with them. I The decision was made to look at positive anteroorn from an engineering point of view and what the impact might be. Also. the programs and all stakeholders should think about it as well. 0 The decision was made to get back in a week or so and discuss what was found with this alternate of positively pressurized anteroom. The following information is being added to these minutes due to some questions asked: BFO is made up of OD. Real Property.r (RPMO), Capital Improvements Design Engineering (DEMO), and Facilities Maintenance 8.: Engineering (FMEO). As a general rule (there are always exceptions), CLMO and DEMO execute projects. RPMO handles leasing and FMEO handles all Facility Maintenance. An organizational chart and specific mission responsibilities for each office may be found in more detail on website Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Sent: Tuesday, March 09. 2010 2:35 PM (W342 To: Monroe, Steve Barrett. Timothy J. (cecroeroaesi; .- . (CDCJOSELSILSPP 30): (bier-12 use. 252ath . (secreIDrNCEZIm; "rocoorOSEP}; - . (em) . Valle. Bessie M. (CDCIOSELSIPHITP Kenneth K. (cocrococrere); Watts, Clark Williams. Allison Zambuter Laura R. Subject: FW: Vivarium Sent: Tuesda .. March 09, 2010 2:21 PM To: Nicholson, Janet (CDC/promo Cc: saunoe, Jean A. (cocrocooroHS); Holmes, David U-S-C- (cocrocooroseej; Howard, William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Blac Caro vn Bowen, Ken L. (caucuses/ere) Subject: Vivarium Please view attached memo regarding the upcoming vivarium project. Also, please send out to HOG members an: life? ibitEHZ so. 262arn) members as you see 252mm MEMO Buildin AESL Project. Thanks Office of Health and Safety Centers. 'Fnr Disease .ontrel and Prevention U5 CI ?2523 hi Please visit and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey. Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Of?ce of Health and Safety Atlanta GA 30333 ?gui?mzqh DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 8: HUMAN SERVICES 94 ch Lg tr": Date: March 9, 2010 SC ?2623{h} Vivarium was to From: Of?ce of Health and Safety provide a clean access corridor around the facility and a central own the middle. ld follow the path of clean corridor, room= and out into a common Re: Vivarium air reversal project US. The basis of design and construction for the Personnel. entering- -in-to- the: containment space won into an anteroom, to the procedure room, into the 33252 ace via a shower out facility. Directional air?ow (enema use. Prior to Vivarium occupancy, OHS observed ?eld conditions, identi?ed corrective rooms. This is the BMBL 252mb; Personnel then would exit th follows the path from clean corridor into the changes and communicated these corrective changes that needed to be made to the operational param ility. The one speci?c issue centered on the need to reverse the air direction in theibfl?j?iz in ?ow from the I into the u'sli?i2a2 basic principal ofbiocontainrnent in 262a: facilities, where infected animals are isolated from adjacent spaces. Additionally, problems with having multiple programs working in the vivarium, work ?ow and immunization requirements supported the need for the change. The utilization of negative rooms is an industry standard su orted by both the BMBL and a thirty year success rate on CDC campus?s currently space There may be additional proposals or options that pro grams may wish to move forward with under different project proposals. These options include the use of Biobubbles as provisional structured anterooms or more permanent bricks and mortar anterooms. OHS is acceptable to either of these options dependent on design. This dependency on design will primarily be based on feasibility of the design and also that the vivarium itself remains the Programs or the I-IOG will be responsible for re-writing current practices and protocols to protocols will also need to be reviewed and Biosafety Manager or a request for assistance oup, which is chartered all agreed to secondary means of containment. new accommodate the air reversal change. Thee approved by the Office of Health and Safet} in writing these new protocols may be mad The voting members of the Building oversight and operations of all spaces in the go forward with the project in March 2009. There is a tight window of opportunity when the Vivarium occupant operations can be shut down to accommodate the project schedule. These changes are requested to ensure the continued safety and health of the viviarium USE: ijl?}242 Ll 8.0. 262ath: occupants and surrounding facility occupants. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probet, Paul E. (CDQIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday. March 09. 2010 1:07 PM To: Moss. Karen Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A- Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams. Jeffery Chandler, George Lingler. Arthur R. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Maxwell. James C. Milbv, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Walpole. Kenneth (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Bowen, Ken L. Hyatt1 Ted D. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 - HOG Directive HOG Directive 3-09-10.de All: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandler from HOG Manager [Dump?is; Ema to BFO with directive to install scope as described. Please note window of duration (July 3-24) that is being planned for shutdown of Vivarium to accommodate the construction effort. Please push ahead to get things in piece: FPAA and subseqUent quick approval from OD, ?nalization of scope. market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG committee of current status. Th anksI Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir., Operations Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 at" atmmta-o. . I 11 1? . Public Health Service DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 3: HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control aw? a and Prevention (CDC) Memorandum Date: March 8, 2010 From: union is us 5; 2523m- mire: To: Paul Probst Building Engineer FMEO CC: Ken Bowen Director, FMED Subject: Building Vivarium Project (P2009453) The members of the Building I ?o s'Group (HOG). - has been chartered to oversee operations of all spaces in the - are I agreed to initiate a request for a HVAG modification project to ohang am to a Grey Corridor by directing the air from the corridor into the respective animal holding rooms. Project P2009453 was developed to accomplish this reversal of air flow. its scope of work included: the necessary changes to the facility HVAC systems; the addition of door sweeps; modification to the glass panels in the doors to allow adequate air flow; oval of the ?pingipong? airflow indicators; the removal of a door and frame at the end of corridor . to be replaced with a walla to addition of a antercom containment barrier between the autoclave area and Bacon Room iibimi?? U- er associated work. This project makes the building the second barrier of protection for this facility. There is a tight window of opportunity when the Vivarium occupant operations can be shut down to accommodate the project schedule. The maximum allowable construction time is a three week period that runs from July 3rd through July 24th. 2010. Mission critical program operations must resume following the construction period. These changes are requested by the HOG and the lfilftice of Health and Safety to ensure the continued safety and health of the facility occupants. As the official Building and Facilities Office representative on the HOG. please provide any and all information to the HOG on the feasibility of this proiect. Sincerely, unlit-412 UE US Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, George Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:26 PM To: Gaunce, Jean A. Nicholson, Janet Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive - IXOS CDC 1219 KB st. 2523th- Jean and Jan: Please ?nd attached a specific request from the HOG, si he by concerning a project request to address directional air flow in an area of ?142 proximate to - i believe both of you are familiar with the project, which is described in some detail in the attachments, and are aware of the apparent controversy surrounding the proposed solutions directional air?ow change with or without anterooms, in the simplest terms}. I am e?mailing you for your concurrence or non-concurrence with the proposal in - Directive not that I am questioning the wisdom of the HOG at all: it?s simply that if there are major concerns that some views on this have not been heard I do not want to get a major change order in the middle of the Project, or to have the issue inadvertently escalate to the 12m ?oor without making sure that opposing views have been properly evaluated by the full HOG, or in accordance with the HOG's approval charter. i understand that a speedy resolution of this issue is quite important - just want to make sure that there is consensus on this or at least informed consent from the appropriate governance Thanks! G, Below (pdf ?le} is the scanned copy of the directive signed by WW I'm not sure if HOG members were recipients of this directive. HOG members did receive a memo from ctr-it I Ilater regarding the basis for design and construction of this project. have attached it below. - Thanks, Jeff All: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandler from HOG Manager to BFO with directive to install scope as described. Please note window of duration (JuIy 3-24) that is being planned for shutdown of Vivarium to accommodate the construction effort. Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from OD. ?nalization of scope, market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG committee of current status. Thanks. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir., Operations BFOJFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 4404-6390505 Cell: 404?285-2550 Maths, Chester (cocrocoorosEP) From: Williams. Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:14 PM To: Bowen. Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Chandler, George Subject: RE: Vivarium I may be out of the loop a little on this, but the only email I received whereby everyone pmws?s was the memo from Dr, I 3 Ibil'?l- Iregarding the basis for design and construction forthe Building 252m- Was the signed directive sent out to a wide distribution as well? Thanks From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 12:29 PM - I To: Williams, Jeffery Prohst, Paul E. Chandler, George Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: Vivarium I saw an email yesterday where all members were copied. George: Did you get concurrence from Jan? Thanks. Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-639-3303 Office 404-639-0499 Fax Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:0? AM To: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L: Chandler, George Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Moss, Karen Subject: FW: Vivarium Paul, I would agree that time is of the essence here, but also want to make sure we have a firm direction that will not change drastically throughout the course of this project. The addition of anterooms (and type of construction) could potentially constitute major changesiaddit ?ns to the scope of the project. As long as all programs concur with the memo signed by OHS DVRD on behalf of the Operations Group (HOG), and agree to the directive contained therein, we should proceed with this direction. Given the memo below I am not absolutely sure all programs are in agreement which may be a contradiction to one of the last sentences in "it - signed memo. I am not sure that all members of the HOG are even aware of this signed directive. Jeff Williams From: Williams, Allison Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 9:35 AM To: Williams, Jeffery (CDCJOCOOKBFD) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium Hl Mr. Williams, Since our meeting with BFO the HOG has still not reached a consensus on this project. I am not sure exactly of what is going on or what purpose the memo from OHS serves, however, OHS has only vote on the HOG. Please see email below. Hopefully, at the next HOG a vote will be taken and all can move forward. I attached the memo from OHS in case you are unable to open it from the embedded attachment below. This was provided to all the HOG members as an FYI. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. All the best, Allison From: (CDCXOIDINCZVED) Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:25 PM To: Williams, Allison Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy J. . Damon In er K. Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS Jim-'42 lotto-?42 roe;? us. mes U-S-C- Ibil?i ibi'?? Pedone, a lib -(bli3l142U-3-C-? (cocxomrn - -- aul E. (coo/ocoorsFO); ml cocgocoorossp); lil Valle Bessie M. CDCIOIDIOD) Walpole, Kenneth K. Watts, Clark EP - Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCJOIDMCIRD) Cc: Black, Carolyn Subject: Re: Vivarium is motion can be addressed at the next HOG meeting. From: Williams Allison Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy J. PDCIOIDINCZVEDJ: warn William (Bill) (coqocoorms (mi-3W I ,E?i??if mg (coerciomcz?I-I??a- (coo/eiorncmo - Ma55un Robert (rm-.42 u.s.c. . {ones-42 uses r?lu. tb} sex at Ecoclocoomsen) {elem use. Probst Paul E. (coo/ocoorsFO); 2525i?) cocxocooroSEP) (cocrocoO/OHS); Walole Kenneth K. (cocrocoorsFO); Watts, Clark (coo/ocoorossp); - I no men - (cocroiomcrno) Cc: Black, Carolyn Sent: Tue Mar 09 17:05:25 2010 Subject: Re: Vivarium All: since the vote referenced in the attached document was taken over one year ago, new information has been provided regarding the scope of this work and the impact to programs. This information includes other viable options which were not originally presented to the HOG at the time of the vote. Based on this new information and possible options and no voiced safety concern with those options, I would like to make a motion for a new vote to be taken regarding the scope of this project. This vote should consider the information that is now available to us that was not available andr'or made clear one year ago. The corridor will not be "clean" based air reversal alone. Very respectfully, Allison Williams Allison Williams, DVM From: (CDCIOIDINCZVED) TD: - Howard William (Bill) (CDC/econ; Hat-I {mom a - PEPE mg, Pedone, James ibii3ii42 LIB-Cs - (CDC/OIo/chvso - Probst Paul E. (cocrocooreso ?52al?l we (cocrocoorosem; i I (cocrocooronsy; val semin- (emblems) Walpole, Kenneth K. Watts, Clark (cocrocoo/OSEP); gait-:32 ?5-0 Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. Sent: Tue Mar 09 14:34:44 2010 Subject: FW: Vivarium use. ?r FYI From: 262nm]- Sent: Tuesda March 09, 2010 2:21 PM To: 53% Nicholson, Janet (coo/0mm ,1 Ce: Gaunce, Jean A. (cos/ocooronsy Holmes, David (cocrocooronsn bill-4.1130 (me/ocooxossp); Howard, William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Black, Carolyn Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Vivarium Please view attached memo regarding the upcoming vivarium project. Also, please send out to HOG members and High Containment Governance Council members as you see US C. 5: 252mm eqMEMOBuiId-i?g? Project.doo>> Than ks USE. 262mm Office of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ?1.431242 2E2ath: Please visit ointoomMebServiceimnveb and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC: in anyr capacity is invited to participate in our survey. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 12:29 PM To: Williams. Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen. Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium i saw an email yesterday where all members were copied. George: Did you get concurrence from Jan? Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-639-3303 Office 404-639?0499 Fax Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are inyited to participate in our survey. From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:07 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M.- Moss, Karen Subject: FW: Vivarium Paul, I would agree that time is of the essence here, but also want to make sure we have a firm direction that will not change drastically throughout the course of this project. The addition of anterooms (and type of construction) could potentially constitute major changesiaddi he sco of the ro'ect. As long as all programs concur with the memo signed by OHS 3? DVRD on behalf of the Inna-42 vs 0. 5 262mm and agree to the directive contained therein, we should proceed with this direction. Given the memo below I am not absolutely sure all programs are in agreement which "new be a contradiction to one of the last sentences in - signed memo. i am not sure that all members of the are even aware of this signed directive. - Jeff Williams From: Williams, Allison Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 9:35 AM To: Williams, Jeffery Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Moss, Karen Subject: FW: Vivarium Hi Mr. Williams. Since our meeting with BFO the HOG has still not reached a consensus on this project- I am not sure exactly of what is going on or what purpose the memo from OHS serves, however, OHS has only vote on the HOG. Please see email below. Hopefully, at the next HOG a vote will be taken and all can move forward. attached the memo from OHS in case you are unable to open it from the embedded attachment below. This was provided to all the HOG members as an FYI. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. All the best, Allison From: ar'y?" Sent: Tuesda March 09, 2010 6:25 PM Inns Monroe, Steve Barrett, Tlmothv J. Damon, Inger K. Howard, .William (Bill) ibil3ii42U mica: (CDC/0min -- - CDC/ocooiosemcogoio/NCZVED); . -, (encircle/n . -bi3if?2?-5-C-? (CDC/omincho - Massun r. tomczveo); COOIOSEP) {bi-3'4? - - (coczocooiaFO); ?:42 U-S-C- CDC/amorosemd Valle Bessie M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Watts, Clark (cociocooiossp); coalesce/asap); Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Black, Carolyn I 1? I Powell, Nathaniel Subject: Re: Vivarium- ?e motion can be addressed at the next HOG meeting. From: Williams Allison I To: Barrett, Timothy J. {bili3ii42 lei-la: I Howard, William (Bill) ?lbilalr42 UB-C- -3 - (CDC/OIo/chveo); lo; I :34? ?mism- (secretoincnm: Pedone, Jarres 4-3-0 Paul E. (morocco/are}; 3 wit: lialle. Bessie M. (CT Walpole, Kenneth K. Watts, Clark (cociccooiosert); (bilsir42 Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Black, Carolyn Powell, Nathaniel Sent: Tue Mar 09 3:05:25 2010 Subject: Re: Vivarium All: since the vote referenced in the attached document was taken over one year ago, new information has been provided regarding the scope of this work and the impact to programs. This information includes other viable options which were not originally presented to the HOG at the time of the vote. Based on this new information and possible options and no voiced safety concern with those options, I would like to make a motion for a new vote to be taken regarding the scope of this project. This vote should consider the information that is now available to us that was not available andi'or made clear one year ago. The corridor will not be "clean" based air reversal alone. Very res pectfully, Allison Williams Allison Williams, DVM From: (CDCJOIDINCZVED) I . Ta- Barrett, Timothy J. - (?ii-3W (CDQOIDINCZVEW I demand, (Bill) (CDC/ocoorons 'ibil3i:42 [oi-r55 f8 crow/N Jnrr'm- I (CDCJOCOOIOQFPI- {bii3il42 . . Ritalin U.S.C. 'm Iainczvem; Pedone, James (bilam LLB-Cs Probat. Pa II E. (cociocorzliBFO?2523i?J i lb:l3:'42 U.S.C.?252alh: Va [p quql?p (cochoioo) Walpole, Kenneth K. (cociocooiaro); Watts, Ciark (coo/ocooiosee); U-S-C- I 2 Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDXNCIRD) Sent: Tue Mar 09 14:34:44 2010 Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI El From: Ibil?r 'W?r (CDCIOCOOKOHS) Sent: Tuesda March 09, 2010 2:21 PM To: "ii Nicholson, Janet I Cc: Gaunce, Jean A. (coo/ocoorom); Holmes, David (coo/ocooroHS); (cocrocoorosspj; Howard, William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Black, Carolyn Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Vivarium nn ding the upcoming vivarium project. Aiso, please send out to HOG members and rims {misiwz us @202301} members as you see Thanks Building 252,, Project.doc>> [Elii?l Of?ce of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention I Dill Ell.- Please visit hit oint.ooranebServiceimrweb andiell us about your recent experiences with OHS. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:07 AM To: Probst. Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Chandler, George Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Meet: FW: Vivarium 9523'? - - MEMO-Building Projectdoc Paul, I would agree that time is of the essence here, but also want to make sure we have a ?rm direction that will not change drastically throughoutthe course of this project. The addition of anterooms (and type of construction} could potentially constitute major changesi'addi to the scope of the project As long as all programs concur with the memo signed by OHS DVRD on behalf of the Operations Group (HOG), and agree to the directive contained therein, we should proceed with this direction. Given the memo below, I am not absolutely sure all programs are in agreement which may be a contradiction to one of the last sentences in Dr. signed memo. I am not sure that all members of the HOG are even aware of this signed directive. Jeff Williams From: Williams, Allison Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 9:35 AM To: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Moss, Karen Subject: FW: Vivarium Hi Mr. Williams, Since our meeting with BFO the HOG has still not reached a consensus on this project- I am not sure exactly of what is going on or what purpose the memo from OHS serves, however, OHS has only vote on the HOG. Please see email below. Hopefully, at the next HOG a vote will be taken and all can move forward. I attached the memo from OHS in case you are unable to open it from the embedded attachment below. This was provided to all the HOG members as an FYI. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. All the best, Allison From: Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:25 PM . mum IAllison Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy J. fig-Liam riociommcz?iiEo); Damon er K. Howard William (Bill) (cociocooi'OHs- Etcociomm -- - (cocxocoo OSEP - - .Litcociomiiczwm- U-S-C- Pedone, James - 3 ul E. 252?? CDC/ocooiosspjalle Bessie Walpole, Kenneth K. Watts, Clark $3.333 Zambuto, Laura R. (cociommcmo) Cc: Black, Carolyn Powell, Nathaniel Subject: Re: Vivarium This motion can be addressed at the next HOG meeting. From: Williams Allison To: Ugg tm Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy J. (coerce/owe); {bli3li42 U-S-C- Damon Iner K. Haward, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOXO . ?252afhl (coerciom -- I - (CDC/ocoorossp); teem? Lf?f" D?f??n Gubert "7UFn?l' ?3353542 Massuno. bert Pedone, James . (WW (coerciomczveo - Probst Paul E. (CDC/ocooiero); not must Valle. Bessie M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Watts, Clark $131133 U-S-C- (coefocooroser?); Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Black, Carolyn Powell, Nathaniel Sent: Tue Mar 09 1?:05:25 2010 Subject: Re: Vivarium All: since the vote referenced in the attached document was taken over one year ago, new information has been provided regarding the scope of this work and the impact to programs. This information includes other viable options which were not originally presented to the HOG at the time of the vote. Based on this new information and possible options and no voiced safety concern with those options, I would like to make a motion for a new vote to be taken regarding the scope of this project. This vote should consider the information that is now available to us that was not available andfor made clear one year ago. The corridor will not be "clean" based air reversal alone. Very respectfully, Allison Williams Allison Williams, DVM (cocrotomczveo) (escrow/Maven); Barrett, Tlmothv]. - Inger K. Howard William (sill)(cocrocoorons- bt?i? (W32- Lb; sultan, ssuno Robert Peaene, ames Paul E. 3525i?? we: (coo/ocooiosee), on: [not BessieM (cocxomroo) Walpole, Kenneth K. Watts, Clark (cocrocoorosem; U-S-C- (cocyocooroserl), Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. (cociomrucmo) Sent: Tue Mar 09 14:34:44 2010 Subject: FW: Vivarium To: an [El From: CDCXOCOOIOHS) Sent: Tuesda March 09, 2010 2:21 PM To: me; Nicholson, Janet .3 42 Cc: Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David 352}; Howard, William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Black, Carolyn Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Vivarium Please view attached memo regarding the upcoming vivarium project. Also, please send out to HOG members an @3142 '3 @523? members as you see ?t 4: US I: 5623'?: Building Projectdocw Thanks 42 LLS Of?ce of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention USE. BEE-sin, l? id=?l &meth=TAG& and tell us about itPlease visit srfi'schoe-arin your recent eXperiences with OHS. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey. US I: 5; basic principal o-f?bioeont-aimne?nt in Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Of?ce of Health and Safety Atlanta GA 30333 Date: March 9, 2010 From: Office of Health and Safety Re: Vivarium air reversal project. 42 St: ?2528?1l The basis of design and construction for the Vivaritnn was to provide a clean access eorri the facility and a ?aw-'42 2523 down the middle. Personnel entering into the 95' 2623 contairunent ace would follow the path of clean corridor, into an anteroom, to the procedure room, into the ?3 use 452 room, and out into a common Personnel then would exit the ace via a shower out facility. Directional air?ow follows the path from clean corridor into the Prior to Vivarium occupancy, OHS observed ?eld conditions, identi?ed corrective changes and communicated these corrective changes that needed to be made to the operational pararr etc-rs of the fa "ility. The one speci?c issue centered on the need to reverse the air direction in the lbl?fi?iiP'S'C' 0 ?ow from the corridor into the animal holding rooms. This is the BMBL facilities, where infected animals are isolated from adjacent spaces. Additionally, problems with having multiple programs working in the vivarium, work ?ow and immunization requirements supported the need for the change. The utilization of negative animal rooms is an industry standard so orted by both the BMBL and a thirty year success rate on CDC campus?s currently operating animal space .. .. . .. There may be additional proposals or options that programs may wish to move forward with under different project proposals. These options include the use of Biobubbles as provisional structured anterooms or more permanent bricks and mortar anteroems. OHS is acceptable to either of these options dependent on design. This dependency on design will primarily be based on feasibility of the design and also that the vivarium itself remains the secondary means of containment. Programs or the HOG will be responsible for re?writing current practices and protocols to accommodate the air reversal change. These new protocols will also need to be reviewed and approved by the Office of Health and Safe this Biosafety Manager or a request for assistance in writing these new protocols may be made?? The voting members of the Building slit Operations Group, whic shattered Imam USE 5 oversight and operations of all spaces in the area of Buildin ,"ti'll' agreed to - "malts-m- go forward with the project in March 2009. There is a tight ?endow of opportunity when the Vivarium occupant operations can be shut down to accommodate the project schedule. These changes are requested to ensure the continued safety and health of the viviariurn Occupants and surrounding facility occupants. lttjiE 11: USE Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: F'robst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFCI) Sent: Wednesday. March 10, 201 0 6:59 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium You are astute. It you are going to make a recommendation in a slide show, why not provide the obvious answers to questions that need to be addressed to make an informative decision. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:35 PM To: Chandler, George Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIDCODIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI Next HOG meeting is Thursday, March 18. We cannot afford to lose time, and accordingly believe it would be good to continue making progress to the scope as it is. If anything were to change, it will probany be the addition of anterooms to the existing scope. anticipate the decision making process will depend on answers to the following questions: 1. Who will pay for Bio-Bubbles? 2. if CMU anterooms are constructed, what would be their cost, and more importantly, how long of a shutdown are we talking about? Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:25 PM To: Williams Allison (compromcrvocm); Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy J. (cocfoorocsox lb)l3):42 U.S.C. Howard. Willie 1 (Bill) 526mm i ?33-42 U-S-C- 5* (cocioccoiosepi; (bi Em: libii3i=42 vac-s - ma: m? ?315' (cocrocooiosem;(bli3ii42 U-S-C- . (LL1qu - (bile: coo/oiomczveo Probst Paul E. (cociocooisro); $523? cociocooioseri), lbii??i ate: . alt, ioroioo) Walpole, Kenneth K. (cociocooxaFO); Watts, Clark @3354? ?~30 :ociocooiosem; Zamhuto, Laura R. (cosmic/noise) Cc: Black, Carolyn Subject: Re: Vivarium Powell, Nathaniel is motion can be addressed at the next HOG meeting. From: Williams Allison To; . gm We Barrett, Timothy J. (cocloorocsop (bll3l:42 u.s.c. ocroto/chveo); Howard william (Bill) (cociocoorols - @252alhl (cociocoolosspl; {bl {bll3l54 {bll3ll42 Massung, Robert Pedone, agar-?5 {cocio 'Probst Paul E. a? ?v'alle Bessie M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Watts, Clark Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Black, Carolyn I Powell, Nathaniel Sent: Tue Mar 09 17:05:25 2010 Subject: Re: Vivarium All: since the vote referenced in the attached documentwas taken over one year ago, new information has been provided regarding the scope of this work and the impact to programs. This information includes other viable options which were not originally presented to the HOG at the time of the vote. Based on this new information and possible options and no voiced safety concern with those options, I would like to make a motion for a new vote to be taken regarding the scope of this project. This vote should consider the information that is now available to us that was not available andlor made clear one year ago. The corridor will not be "clean" based air reversal alone. Veryr respectfully, Allison Williams Allison Williams, DVM DIN CZVED) q- To: Monroe, Steve (Comm/Maven), Barrett, Timothy J. (cocloo/ocsO); (coclotomczv aowarel. William (Bill) (cocrocoolcws - ml' I M32543 {bll3li42U-S-C? Pedone, James lbll3l_:42 v.30. - Probst Paul E. (CDC/ocooxaFo 2523i?) (cociocoolosEP); of: (cocrocooloHS); val e. Bessie M. Walpole, Kenneth K. watts, Clark glam} U-S-C- Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. Sent: Tue Mar 09 14:34:44 2010 SubjECt: FW: Vivarium From: FYI I. ll. From: Sent: Tuesda March 09, 2010 2:21 PM To: (coclotomczveo); Nicholson, Janet . Cc: Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David (cocyocoolcle); (CDCIOCOOIOSEP): Howard. William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Black, Carolyn Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Vivarium Please view attached memo regarding the upcoming vivarium project. Also, please send out to HOG members and High Containment Governance Council members as you see lbl'3l142 LIS. . 2? 23lln sell/lEMO - Projectdocee Thanks Itiil'EI 11: Of?ce of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention us?: 52:32am Please visit and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey. 'lbl Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:35 PM To: Chandler, George Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI - Next HOG meeting is Thursday. March 18. We cannot afford to lose time, and accordingly believe it woul be good to continue making progress to the scope as it is. If anything were to change, it will probany be the addition of anteroorns to the existing scope. I anticipate the decision making process will depend on answers to the following questions: 1. Who will pay for Bio-Bubbles? 2. If CMU anterooms are constructed, what would be their cost, and more importantly. how long of a shutdown are we talking about? Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Sent: Tuesday, . March 09, 2010 6:25 PM I J. .- 0 mon. Inner K. (C Howard, William (Bill) (cocgocooyo at cot/ocoomssp); Massung, Pedone, James lison Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy J. (ocxocootossp) U-S-C- . - Probst, Paul E. a? ma: CDC/om/oo) Walpole, Kenneth K. (cocxocoorBFO); mum (cocxocooxosm; Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Black, Carolyn Powell, Nathaniel Subject: Re: Vivarium This motion can be addressed at the next HOG meeting. (5H3) ll leE?: libll??. 252mm - Barrett, Tlmothv J. .(Bill) (cocrocooroas' {bli3ii42 uses (coctocotJ/OSEP); rurt?iz- L-S-C- (CDCIO CDCIDIDINCIRD Massun Robert Pedon - e, James Probst Paul E. (coctccooxsro); 25203?? l_ I -a m; coc ommcans-rp); atom/co) (CTR): Walpole, Kenneth K. (cocyocoomFO); Watts, Clark U.S.C. Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Black, Carolyn Powell, Nathaniel Sent: Tue Mar 09 17:05:25 2010 Subject: Re: Vivarium All: since the vote referenced in the attached document was taken over one year ago, new information has been provided regarding the scope of this work and the impact to programs. This information includes other viable options which were not originally presented to the HOG at the time of the vote. Based on this new information and possible options and no voiced safety concern with those options, I would like to make a motion for a new vote to be taken regarding the scope of this project. This vote should consider the information that is now available to us that was not available andior made clear one year ago. The corridor will not be "clean" based air reversal alone. Very respectfully. Allison Williams Allison Williams, DVM From: (coo/otom 'ro: - Iner K. [ll-WE." (cvcioc - - (CDCIOIDINCZVE non, . (cociotomc ianwbiisiswsca ibii3i.42 (cociom/NCIRD]; Pedon ,Uigi?e? U-Scs - Probst Paul E. {cociocooieFO? (cociocooiosem I ma cociocooicJHS); Val (CTR WanIe Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO), F- ??am I Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDINCIRDJ Sent: Tue Mar 09 14:34:44 2010 Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI uesda March 09, 2010 2:21 PM - i . Him Nicholson, Janet (cociotoioo Cc: Gaunce, Jean a. (cociocooioHS); Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Black, Carolyn Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Vivarium Please view attached memo regarding the upcoming vivarium project. Also, please send out to HOG members and Governance Council members as you see ib532'42US . aa?ana Proiect.doc>> Thanks 112 5252mm Of?ce of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HE C. 5 262mm Please visit ointcornlWebServioelmnveb and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey. Maths, Chester (CDCIDCOOIOSEE) From: I [5'3352?1552 Sent: Tuesday, ?viarch 09, 2010 6:25 PM To: Williams, Allison Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy J. lilti?? as. Wwpolomlvcezmi; - . luvs; {0){33142 I 4 05.0. 26 afh} uses I lbll3ll42 uses (CDCIOIDINCERD(CDCIOIDINCEZID Probst Paul E. (cosiochoreFO); II (encrocooroSHE); Valle. Ee (cosiosasrPHITe - . . - Kenneth K. (cosiocoomFO); (cosiocoorosee); Zambuto, Laura s. (coerciomcneo) Cc: Black, Carolyn Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Subject: Re: Vivarium This motion can be addressed at the next HOG meeting. From: Williams Allison - (cocxoro/ ?31133? lanai we, I Immoqocooy - ?52am (cocloco ossm: ma.- I ?3 331421-30- CDC - as. mm -3 ;Probst Paul E. (cocrocooxsFO); 252alhl Coqocoorossp); i alle Ressie Walpole, Kenneth K. U-S-C- {cocrocoO/ossp); Zambuto, Laura (cocloromcrao) Cc: Black, Carolyn Powell, Nathaniel Sent: Tue Mar 09 17:05:25 2010 Subject: Re: Vivarium All: since the vote referenced in the attached document was taken over one year ago, new information has been provided regarding the scope of this work and the impact to programs. This information includes other viable options which were not originally presented to the HOG at the time of the vote. Based on this new information and possible options and no voiced safety concern with those options, I would like to make a motion for a new vote to be taken regarding the scope of this project. This vote should consider the information that is now available to us that was not available andror made clear one year ago. The corridor will not be "clean" based air reversal alone. Very res pectfully, Allison Williams Allison Williams, DVM .. Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOI. (cocrocoo . . . - (CDCIOCOOIOSEPN -ibil3ii42 LLB-Cs coo/clo/chveo - Probst Paul E. (coczocoorsre - Walpole, Kenneth K. Watts, Clark 336231;)? U-S-C- at 1 Williams, Allison Zambuto, LaUra R. (CDCXOIDXNCIRD) Sent: Tue Mar 09 14:34:44 2010 Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI El Fromw (CDCXOCOOIOHS) Sent: Tuesda March 09, 2010 2:21 PM To: - Cc: saunce, Jean A. (cociocoo 0145- (sociocooroashibiimi?U-S-C-i Howard. IEHB: William (Bill) (cocrocooimsx a SEEf?E?arolyn icoLiOIomcr-ocm); Bowen, Ken L. (conocooreFo) Subject: Vivarium Illa-'- ched memo re arding the Upcoming vivarium project. Also, please send out to HOG members and members as you see Ibir3}.42 LI 5 252801:- Building Project.doc>> Thanks Of?ce of Health and Safetyr Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ll) il?i Please visit sr?srcbearln oint.comiWebServicel'mrweb and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC: in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey. I'd Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 5:43 PM I To: Williams, Jeffery Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOFBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. 3 42 Subject: FW: Vivarium, Additional info that was sent to lanai-:12 c. s252ailil Thanks. Paul 404-839?0505 From: I. i I I [Enigmg'g?zl Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 2:35 PM I To: Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy J. (CDCIOIDINCZV gill; i mile I l- {coclomluczvm}; -lovvard. William (Bill) (coclocool - ijlalisl:42 (coclocoolosela); an; nulls: min: gag]? - - - (cocloIo/NCZVED;Prabst Paul E. (coclocooiosem; inn-.- lain: (CDCIOCOOIOHSN Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDC/ocoolsFO); Watts, Clark (coclocoolOSEP); 335353):le (coclocooioseri); Williams, Allison Zamhuto, Laura R. a1 3 Subject: FW: Vivarium Sent: Tuesda March 09, 2010 2:21 PM To: {cocloroiuczveo); NichoISon, Janet (CDC/omit) Cc: Gaunce, Jean A. (cocxocoo OHS - (CDC/ocoolosem; Howard, William (Bill) ist- Black, Carolyn Bowen, Ken L. (cociocoolsFo) Subject: Vivarium I ding the upcoming vivarium project. Also, please send out to HOG members and mm? U3 ?523"? members as you see fit. USE: 252w:- a [011231-242 LJ . 2523.?: I II Than k5 lbll'E: Office of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention rhii?' Please visit and tell us about your recent eXperiences with DHS. This survey' is for intemal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC in any capacity is invited to participate In our survey. Hamster-g. I . ?Mtqu 39,. i {g DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 5'4 HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Of?ce of Health and Safety Atlanta GA 30333 Date: March 9, 2010 From: Office ofHealth and Safety Re: Vivarium air reversal project 42 so ?2523tht The basls of design and construction for the lVivanum was to provide a clean access corridor around the facility and a Itbtt33142 U-S-C- 2526 Idown the middle. Personnel entering into the us?f??iza containment Space would follow the path of clean corridor, into an anteroom, to the procedure room, into the animal holding room, and out into a common Personnel then would exit the space via a shower out facility. Directional air?ow follows the path from clean corridor into the Prior to Vivarium occupancy, OHS serve te conditions, identi?ed corrective changes and communicated these corrective changes that needed to be made to the operational parameters of the facility. The one specific issue centered on the need to reverse the air direction in the tbltEli-?IZ ?ow from the corridor into the animal holding rooms. This is the BMBL basic pa?iidf?lmoeontainment in facilities, where infected animals are isolated from adjacent spaces. Additionally, problems with having multiple programs working in the vivarium, work ?ow and immunization requirements supported the need for the change. The utilization of negative animal rooms is an industry standard 51333-5"th by both the BMBL and a thirty year success rate on CDC eampus?s currently operating 2523 animal space There may be additional proposals or options that programs may wish to move forward with under different project proposals. These options include the use of Biobubbles as provisional structured anterooms or more permanent bricks and mortar antero ems. OHS is acceptable to either of these Options dependent on design. This dependency on design will primarily be based on feasibility of the design and also that the vivarium itself remains the secondary means of containment. Pro grams or the HOG will be responsible for re-writing current practices and protocols to rotocols will also need to be reviewed and Biosafet?y Manager ora request for assistance accommodate the air reversal change. These new- approved by the Office of Health and Safe in ?waiting these new protocols may be made- I The voting members of the Building oversight and operations of all spaces in the M3142 LIB-C 262am' area of Building as all agreed to go forward with the project in March 2009. There is a tight window of opportunity when the Vivarium occupant operations can be shutdown to accommodate the project schedule. These changes are requested to ensure the continued safety and health of the viviarium occupants and surrounding facility occupants. Operations Group, which is chartered Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Williams. Allison (CDCIOIDJNCEZI D) Sent: Tuesda March 09. 2010 5:05 PM To: troycocrororucezro) CDCIODJDADS ECDCIOI n: ib}n3?, n'euct- ?3-153 ions, anPrnIrirMPF?lnt- ibl -?b-?i3l42 ?55- 2551'? rucezroy (cocrororncezror Inn: - ?5-03 (cocrocomaFO): crocoorossp); .- (cocrocoorOSHE}; Valle, E-essie M. (CDCIOSELSIPHITP _l Walpole. nneth K. Watts, Clark (cocrocoorOSEP); M042 U-S-C- Zambuto. Laura R. (cocrororNCIRo) mam? Cc: Black, Carolyn Powell, Nathaniel (coerciorucezro) Subject: Re: Vivarium use. All: since the vote referenced in the attached document was taken over one year ago, new information has been provided regarding the scope of this work and the impact to programs. This information includes other viable options which were not originally presented to the HOG at the time of the vote. Based on this new information and possible options and no voiced safety concern with those options, [would like to make a motion for a new vote to be taken regarding the scope of this project. This vote should consider the information that is now available to us that was not available andlor made clear one year ago. The corridor will not be "clean" based air reversal alone. Very respectfully, Allison Williams Allison Williams, DVM From: To: (cos/010mm u-L cocromruczveo); .342 I _?mn I (cocrocm/OSEP); @5311 Pedone, Jmes crooner/assay imam use. a - . IE. (morocco/see 252i? Val e. Bessie M. lbll3l342 U-S-C- 262ath Ma - - - (cocrocoorOSEP) mils: Walpole, Kenneth K. Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCXOIDINCIRD Sent: Tue Mar 09 14:34:44 2010 Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI From Sent: Tuesda March 09, 2010 2:21 PM To: (cocroro/chveo); Nicholson, Janet Cc: Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David j??af'h't Howard, William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Black, Carolyn Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Vivarium - - - ttached memo regarding the upcoming vivarium project. Also. please send out to HOG members and Governance Council members as you see [bille 42 US ?l 262mm Projectdoo?e?e Than ks IIJE-IE: Office of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention mini} Please visit ointcommebServicermnNeb and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIDSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 2:45 PM TO: Lingler, Arthur mm? FOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P200945 Li a HVAC Modi?cations to Art: This should answer one ofyour two questions. I'll get with OHS on the decon. Thanks, Paul 404-539-0505 From: Probst, Paui E. Sent: Friday,r January 22, 2010 5:22. PM To: Moss,r Karen Daniels,r Charles E. Tanya A. LingIer, Arthur R. Nogueira, William P. Blanchard, Thomas M. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. mm, 5 2623 Subject: F200945 will?? - HVAC Modi?cations to' All: I met with programs currently using the space that will affected by the above project, and informed them of the increased scope and cost of the project. The issue remains that the area will require a shutdown in order to perform the work, and that we were close to ?nalizing the scope such that we could present the scope to the 8A contractor with whom we are going to negotiate. It was also explained that while a shutdown duration of two weeks was being thrown around, BFO had never fully committed to that duration. It was stressed that while we would everything in our power (weekend and night work by the contractor, strategic planning. advance fab of materials, etc), we could not commit to a duration until we presented the scope to the contractor and they digested it, and responded with a realistic schedule. It was also explained that there will be some in-house testing that, based on the results, may require some additional tweaks. The feedback from program is that they need as much advance planning as they can get, and they backed off the start date of the ?rst week of June and indicated that the ?rst week of July would be acceptable. However. they again emphasized the importance of minimizing the shutdown time. Therefore, I am asking that we push ahead as necessary to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from OD, ?nalization of scope, market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Thanks, Paul ProtestI PE Asst. Din, Operations BFOfFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) (CDCIOIDKNCEZID) Tuesday. March 09, 2010 2:35 PM Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy J. I nu Iner K. Howard. William (Bill) ib}(3l142 v.30. use. (CDCIOIDINCEZID 262aihl i i - - s2 coololomc cocrocooroseri) bi - Ilm Valle, Bessie M. (CDCIOSELSIPHITP 1 - enneth K. Watts, Clark 'm Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDJNCIRD) FWI Vivarium From: Senh To: 3- Ibil?i I I aui'E. Subject: (CDCIOCOOKOHS) a March 09, 2010 2:21 PM - P: Nicholson, Janet (coclomloo Cc: Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Powell,r Nathaniel Black, Carolyn Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCUOXBFD) Subject: Vivarium Please view attached memo regarding the upcoming vivarium project. Also, please send out to HOG members and Governance Council members as you see Ibll3;.42 252mm U. . 252cm: Project. . . . Thanks inlay-42 use 525mm UITICE 0T i-lealtn and safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2522mm. Please visit and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. This survey is for intemai CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey. 4" ant-nun)? [til-[311: C: 5 E?Ealli. It];le 42 U5 '3 EBEailil . law's-J. Public Health Service DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH dc HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Of?ce ofllealrh and Safety Atlanta GA 30333 Date: March 9, 2010 From: Of?ce of Health and Safety Re: Vivarium air reversal project so ?2a2ami The basis of design and construction for the Vivarium was to provide a clean access corridor around the facility and a IlEllali?lz U-S-C- 2 2a Idown the middle. . _.P_ersonne1 entering into the containment space would follow the path of clean corridor, into an antcroom, to the procedure room, into the I I - room, and out into a common bill-12 U-S-C- Personnel then would exit the space via a shower out facility. Directional air?ow follows the path from clean corridor into the Prior to Vivarium occupancy, OHS served held conditions, identi?ed corrective changes and communicated these corrective changes that needed to be made to the operational parameters of the facility. The one Speci?c issue centered on the need to reverse the air direction in the ?ow from the corridor into the animal holding rooms. This is the BMBL basic. princi pal of h-i-oc-o-ntairnne-nt-in facilities, where infected animals are isolated from adjacent spaces. Additionally, problems with having multiple programs working in the vivarium= work ?ow and immunization requirements supported the need for the change. The utilization of negative animal rooms is an industry standard st by both the BMBL and a - - thirty year success rate on CDC campus?s currently operatm lhe'e 5 pl space ancient There may be additional proposals or options that programs may wish to move forward with under different project proposals. These options include the use of Biobubbl'cs as provisional structured anterooms or more permanent bricks and mortar anterooms. OHS is acceptable to either of these options dependent on design. This dependency on design will primarily be based on feasibility of the design and also that the vivarium itself remains the secondary means of centainment. Programs or the HOG will be responsible for reriwriting current practices and protocols to accommodate the air reversal change. These new protocols will also need to be reviewed and approved by the Of?ce of Health and Safety Biosafety Manager or a request for assistance in writing these new protocols may be made The voting members of the. Building oversight and operations of all Spaces in the use 3.2623 Operations Group, which .. .. lh :1 I 3.43 C. -- all 19.. . n' go forward with the project in March 2009. There is a tight window of Opportunity when the Vivarium occupant operations can be shut down to accommodate the project schedule. These changes are requested to ensure the continued safety and health of the viviaritmi occupants and surrounding facility occupants. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday. March 09, 2010 2:13 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2000453 - HOG Directive - Thanks. Paul. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and orifice Centers for Disease Centre! and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop K-as Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 7?0-483-8105 Celt: 404-444-6201 e-maii: TBianchard cdc. ov From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:0? PM To: Moss, Karen Daniels, Charies E. Tanya A. Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Chandler, George Lingler, Arthur R. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Maxwell, James C. Milby, Stephen C. Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Bowen, Ken L. Hyatt, Ted D. Subject: P2009453 - HOG Directive File: HOG Directive 3-09-10.pdf All: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandler from HOG Manager to BFO with directive to install scope as described. Please note window of duration (July 3-24) that is being planned for shutdown of Vivarium to accommodate the co nstruction effort. Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from OD, ?nalization of scope, market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG committee of current status. Thanks, Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir., Operations BFOlFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:47r PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Does the 3 week window include the time needed by OHS to decon the space, or will that be done before out three week window. Also, is there any ?follow-on" work by others that must be included in the three week window? Art From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:0? PM To: Moss, Karen Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Chandler, George Lingler, Arthur R. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Maxwell, James C. Miiby, Stephen c. Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Bowen, Ken L. Hyatt, Ted D. Subject: P2009453 - HOG Directive File: HOG Directive All: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandler from HOG Manager to BFO with directive to install-scope as-described. Please note window of duration (July 3-24) that is being planned for shutdown of Vivarium to accommodate the construction effort. Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subseQuent quick approval from OD, ?nalization of scope, market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as neoessary to report back to HOG committee of current status. Thanks, Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir., Operations BFOiFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Office 404-639?0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 l?li'lathe, Chester From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:25 PM To: Nogueira, William P. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Subject: Fw: P2009453 HOG Directive IXOS CDC 1181 KB Attachments: placeholdertmp Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Probst, Paul E. To: Moss, Karen Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Chandler, George Lingler, Arthur R. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Maxwell, James C. Milby, Stephen C. Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Bowen, Ken L. Hyatt, Ted D. Sent: Tue Mar 09 13:06:54 2010 Subject: P2009453 - HOG Directive Directive All: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandler from HOG Manager lugs; - . to BFO with directive to install scope as described. Please note window of duration {July 3-24) that is being planned for shutdown of Vivarium to accommodate the construction effort Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from OD, ?nalization of scope, market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG committee of current status. Thanks, Paul Probst, PE Asst. Din, Operations Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-235-2550 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Proust, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, March 09. 2010 1:0? PM To: Moss, Karen Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Chandler, George Lingler, Arthur R. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Mame?, James C. Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Walpole. Kenneth K. Bowen, Ken L. Hyatt. Ted D. (cosiocooreFo) Subject: P2009453 HOG Directive - 1X03 CDC 1189 KB ATTSHEE All: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandler from HOG Manage mi to BFO with directive to install scope as described. Please note window of duration (July 3-24) that is being planned for shutdown of Vivarium to aocommod ate the construction effort. Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from OD. ?nalization of scope, market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG committee of current status. Thanks. Paul Probst. PE Asst. Dir, Operations Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404?235-2560 Maths, Chester (cocrocoorossep From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Monday, March 08. 2010 7:44 AM To: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOBFO) Subject: FW: Moving forward with Vivarium project William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.21?4 6?8.614.?253? wch3@cdc.gov Please visit the OHS Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 ?:42 AM To: Howard, William (Bill) Subject: FW: Moving forward with Vivarium project Sorry, I left you off ofthe is not my specialty. From: i cocrocoorom) Sent: Sunda March 2010 8:11 PM To: Subject: Re: Moving forward with Vivarium project Air entering corridor is clean. It is up to the personnel and protocols to keep it clean. From: To: (CDCJOCOUIOHS) Sent: Sun Mar 0? 19:46:10 2010 Subject: Re: Moving forward with Vivarium project Allison is caught up in "dirty" air. We deal with dirty air all the time. works with animals infected with different viruses in the same animal room. Would we require 1 agent per animal room {or prevent passage of waste would wreck work. So I don't think the programs will want to go there if absolutely _100 percent guaranteed clean air is required for all animal work. This has never existed at CDC and we will not have it any time soon. I am out for most of tomorrow. From: To: . Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Sun ar 0? 13:47:25 2010 Subject: Re: Moving forward with Vivarium project I am done discussing this. if you guys want to discuss this torn - i . - at it. What was agreed upon is we are forward with the air reversal. OHS was receptive to having theput in to act as the anti-room to accommodate both program and ARB's wants and it will get included in this project. We would view the three or four plans they came up with and pick the most acceptable plan. As discussed OHS is not going immune fifiiai? ., to act as the facilities means of containment which is why there is going to be an air reversal. If the - changes that air curtain at the door we are fine with that as long as the capability is there. If there were to be a allure of that required maintenance on the ?or it was decided to be removed in a particular room, the air reversal would still ensure containment. This is it. If there is still a problem OHS will move forward with only the re?? of?ce is going to require this to happen. We want to work with folks which is why we are receptive to if this continues to be debated what happens after the reversal will have to go through a separate project and through the HOG and then through OHS. That is why we meet, to grab this short window of opportunity to include both projects in one. From: Williams, Allison To: Damon, Ing, . Probst, Paul E. (coefccooferop (CDC DCOOJOHS Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Sent: Fri Mar 05 14:23:08 2010 Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project CDC Massung Robert - There is no reason to move forward with an air reversal project if it is not necessary. Below are the options that have been discussed Has anyone actually talked with DSAT to confirm the acceptability of the presented options. Scenario One: Air Reversal wlo anteroom: moving air from the soiled corridor into the animal room. This is not acceptable to ARE and according the BMBL air into the animal holding areas should be "clean" air. Air Reversal w! anteroom [negative to hall): moving air from the soiled corridor into the anteroom and into the animal room. This would take away the operational advantage of the anteroom but could possibly (with i3 allow for HEPA ?ltered air to be dumped into the animal room. This is acceptable to ARB as long as the air ac In 0 the animal spaces is clean air. $1 air reversal with! anteroom (positive to hall and animal room}: Supplying clean air in both directions. This option could be acceptable from a DSAT perspective. Has anyone bothered to ask? From: Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 2:11 PM To: Williams, Damon, Inger K. Massung, Robert Probst, Paul E. - Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project YES or NO From: Williams, Allison Sent: Frida March 05, 2010 2:03 PM To: Damon, Inger K. Massung Robert Probst, Paul E. (cociocoo/sro); I 2 Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCICCIDJNCIRD) Cc: Im Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project This is not what was decided. ARB is not in favor of air reversal without a physical barrier. We are waiting on written documentation from OHS on their position. This was supposed to be provided to ARB and has not. Allison From: Lguc'msig?g? Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 2:03 PM ZVED Massun, Robert Probst, Paul E. (codocooroasn Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCICCIDXNCIRD) Subject: Moving forward with Vivarium project To: Damon, Inger K. (CDCICCIDXNC All, FMEO has asked that the HOG and OHS provide direction regarding the Vivarium project. We were not able to agree to a solution to the issue of anteroom instaliation at the last HOG meeting, but a separate meeting between ARB and OHS to discuss it took place. What came out of that meeting was a proposal to continue with the original plan of reversing the air flow back into the animal holding areas and to include a recommendation (from ARB and other Programs) for the 26am of con tainment barriers as an additional level of protection. What i need from you is to respond either YES {for this proposal) or NO (against this proposal). If there is no objection, then a memo will be sent out requesting FMEO to proceed accordingly. Thanks! :12 Note: As of yet, it has not been determined where the funding for the (b){3)i4 U.S.C. 2 $2 5.0. 2523ih' devices would come from. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: I use Sent: rldav, arch 05 2010 4:28 PM To: ?titties Damon, ?nger K. (cocrororrtcezmi: Massung, Robert Probet, Paul E. (cocrccooreec); mam Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDINCIRD) Cc: Posey. James E. Plikaytis. Bonnie Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project main concern is the time taken to complete the vivarium project. Can we know the time schedule for this project? From: Sent: Friday, March 05'r 2010 2:03 PM To: Damon Inger K. (CDCICCIDJNC I .. - Robert Probst, Paul E. Williams, Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCICCIDINCIRD) Subject: Moving forward with Vivarium project All, FMEO has asked that the HOG and OHS provide direction regarding the Vivarium project. We were not able to agree to a solution to the issue of antercom installation at the last HOG meeting, but a separate meeting between ARB and OHS to discuss it took place. What came out of that meeting was a proposal to continue with the original plan of reversing the air ?ow back into the animal holding areas and to include a recommendation [from ARE and other Programs) for the installationl'use of containment barriers as an additional level of protection. Whatl need from you is to respond either YES (for this proposal) or NO (against this proposal). If there is no objection, then a memo will be sent out requesting FMEO to proceed accordingly. Thanks! 413 US IL 5 Note; As of yet, it has not been determined where the funding for the: devices "Regan 42 U5 Mathe, Chester From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 2:39 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: FW: Moving forward with Vivarium project FYI. Call me when convenient. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Williams, Allison Sent: Frida March 05, 2010 2:23 PM Damon, In .. - Probst, Paul E. m- El Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project There is no reason to move forward with an air reversal project it it is not necessary. Below are the options that have been discussed Has anyone actually talked with DSAT to con?rm the acceptability of the presented options. Scenario One: Air Reversal wio anteroom: moving air from the soiled corridor into the animal room. This is not acceptable to ARE and according the BMBL air into the animal holding areas should be "clean" air. Air Reversal w! anteroom (negative to hell): moving air from the soiled corridor into the anteroom room. This would take away the operational advantage of the anteroom but could possiblv (with ?gamma HEPA ?ltered air to be dumped into the animal room. This is acceptable to ARB as long as the air back into the animal spaces is clean air. air reversal withi anteroom (positive to hall and animal room): Supplying clean air in both directions, This option could be acceptable from a DSAT perspective. Has anyone bothered to ask? From: . ??lji??z Ef??j Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 2:11 PM To: Williams, Damon, Inger K. CDC Massung, Robert Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoorsro); ll Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project YES or NO From: Inner Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 2:08 PM Damon,Inerl<. coc . (CDC/cao/chveo); Probst, Paul e. (coqocooieFO) Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project This is not what was decided. ARB is not in favor of air reversal without a physical barrier. We are waiting on written documentation from OHS on their position. This was supposed to be provided to ARB and has not. AI l'i son From: I Sent: Friday, March (15, 2010 2:03 PM To: (CDCICCIDK I I - Robert Probst, Paul E. - Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCICCIDINCIRD) Subject: Moving forward with Vivarium project All, FMEO has asked that the HOG and OHS provide direction regarding the Vivarium project. We were not able to agree to a solution to the issue of anteroom installation at the last HOG meeting, but a separate meeting between ARB and OHS to discuss it took place. What came out of that meeting was a proposal to continue with the original plan of reversing the air flow back into the .in . I I ing areas and to include a recommendation (from ARES and other Programs) for the installationfuse of containment barriers as an additional level of protection. Whatl need from you is to respond either YES (for this proposal] or NO {against this proposal). Ifthere is no objection. then a memo will be sent out requesting FMEO to proceed accordingly. Thanksl Note: As of yet, it has not been determined where the funding for the 25 devices would come from. Ihh 3:42 U5 L. '53 262mm Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Williams, Allison (CDCIDIDINCEZID) Sent: Frida March 05 2010 2:23 PM To: I Damon. Inger K. (CDCIO I I. assung, Robert (cocroror'ncs - - - - (cocrocoorBFoy- Cc: Powell. Nathaniel (CDCJOIDINC-EZID) Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project There is no reason to move forward with an air reversal project if it is not necessary. Below are the options that have been discussed Has anyone actually.r talked with DSAT to con?rm the acceptability of the presented options. Scenario One: Air Reversal wlo anteroom: moving air from the soiled corridor into the animal room. This is not acceptable to ARB and according the BMBL air into the animal holding areas should be "clean" air. Air Reversal w! anteroom (negative to hell): moving air from the soiled corridor into the anteroom I I a - animal room. This would take away the operational advantage of the anteroom but could gossiblg {with allow for HEPA ?ltered air to be dumped into the animal room. This is acceptable to ARB as long as the air back into the animal spaces is clean air. air reversal with?r anteroom (positive to hall and animal room): Supplying clean air in both directions. This option could be acceptable from a DSAT perspective. Has anyone bothered to ask? From: 1? 54m Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 2:11 PM To: Williams, Allison Damon, Inger K. CDC Massung, Probst, Paul E. i Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project YES or NO From: Williams, Allison Sent: Frida March 05, 2010 2:08 PM To: Damon, Inger K. coerccromczvao); Massung Robert Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoorsro); Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project This is not what was decided. is not in favor of air reversal without a physical barrier. We are waiting on written documentation from OHS on their position. This was supposed to be provided to ARB and has not. Allison From: Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 2:03 PM Robert F'robstr Paul E. Williams, Allison To: Damon Inger K. A as. Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCICCIDINCIRD) Subject: Moving forward with Vivarium project (?-tllI FMEO has asked that the HOG and OHS provide direction regarding the Vivarium project. We were not able to agree to a solution to the issue of anteroom installation at the last HOG meeting. but a separate meeting between ARB and OHS to discuss it took place. What came out of that meeting was a proposal to continue with the original plan of reversing the air ?ow back into the animal holding areas and to include a recommendation (from ARES and other Programs) for the installationi'use ofontairlment barriers as an additional level of protection. Whatl need from you is to respond either YES {for this proposal) or NO (against this proposal}. If there is no objection. then a memo will be sent out requesting FMEO to proceed accordingly. ThanksNote: As of yet, It has not been determined where the funding for the devices would come from. .4 ?muf?er-i LIL: I Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEPI From: Williams, Allison Sent: Frida march 05 2010 2:12 PM To: $ng Damon. Inger K. Massung, Robert (coercion-lo - E. (cocrocooieso); I won Zambuto, Laura R. Co: Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project This is not what was discussed andior agreed upon in the meeting. NO From: ?g??fdg?z'lizl Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 2:11 PM To: Williams, Allison Damon, Inger K. Massung, Robert Probst, Paul E. (coprocooxeFO); Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCICCIDINCIRD) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project YES or NO From: Williams, Allison Sent: Frida arch 05, 2010 2:08 PM To: Damon, Inger K. Massung, Robert Probst, Paul E. (cocxocoo/BFO); (coczcuoxnansrP); (CDCIOCOOIOHS Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project -. - l- I This is not what was decided. ARB is not in favor of air reversal without a physical barrier. We are waiting on written documentation from OHS on their position. This was supposed to be provided to ARB and has not. From: . Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 2:03 PM To: Damon Inger K. Massun Robert Probst, Paul E. (sociocooroHS); Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. Subject: Moving forward with Vivarium project FMEO has asked that the HOG and OHS provide direction regarding the Vivarium project. We were not able to agree to a solution to the issue of anteroom installation at the last HOG meeting, but a separate meeting between ARB and OHS to discuss it took place. What came out of that meeting was a proposal to continUe with the original plan of reversing the air ?ow back into the animal holding areas and to include a recommendation (from ARB and other Programs) for the ii?f?fllationiuseof- containment barriers as an additional level of protection. What I need from you is to respond either YES (for this proposal) or NO (against this proposal). If there is no objection. then a memo will be sent out requesting FMEO to proceed accordingly. Thanks! Note: As of yet, it has not been determined where the funding for the .., [Dish-1 ldp'jn IUDCE ?13:3 '42 U33 C. E: 262th chdf'h?x fh') devices would come from. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: (coorOiDrNCEZIo) Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 2:11 PM To: Williams, Allison Damon, lnger K. (CDCIOI Massung, Robert Probst, Paul E. {cocrocooraro); :lhii?r an; Zambuto, Laura R. (coerciorNCiRo) Cc: Powell, hathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project YES or NO From: Williams, Allison Sent: Fri'da March 05, 2010 2:Damon, Inger K. Robert (cocrcaoriiczveo); Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoorerm; (CDCIOCOO OHS Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCICCIDINCIRD) Cc: Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project This is not what was decided. ARB is not in favor of air reversal without a physical barrier. We are waiting on written documentation from OHS on their position. This was supposed to be provided to ARB and has not. Allison From: (CDCICCIDINCZVED) Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 2:03 PM To: Damon, Inger K. - Massun Robert Probst, Paul E. (cocrocooronsn Williams, Allison Zambuto, LaUra R. Subject: Moving forward with Vivarium project AllI FMEO has asked that the HOG and OHS provide direction regarding the Vivarium project. We were not able to agree to a solution to the issue or anteroom installation at the last HOG meeting, but a separate meeting between ARE and OHS to discuss it took place. What came out of that meeting'was a proposal to continue with the original plan of reversing the air flow back into the animal holcling areas and to include a recommendation (from ARB and other Programs} for the installationluse ofltbil3ii42 containment barriers as an additional level of protection. What i need from you is to respond either YES (for this proposal) or NO (against this proposal). If there is no objection, then a memo will be sent out requesting FMEO to proceed accordingly. Thanks! Note: As of yet, it has not been determined where the funding for the Bio-Bubble devices would come from. USE. Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Williams. Allison Sent: Frida March 05 2010 2:08 PM To: (coercioiilcezio); oaman, Inger K. lcocrommcezuoi; Massung. Robert (CDCIOIDINCEZID - Probst Paul E. (cocrocooi'oSHei; Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project This is not what was decided. ARE is not in favor of air reversal without a physical barrier. We are waiting on written documentation from OHS on their position. This was supposed to be provided to ARES and has not. Allison From: "ED?Q?qu??zl (CDCICCI Sent: Friday, Marsh 05, 2010 2:03 PM To: Damon, Inger K. Massun Robert Probst, Paul E. (coclocooxom); Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. Subject: Moving forward with Vivarium project AllI FMEO has asked that the HOG and OHS provide direction regarding the Vivarium project. We were not able to agree to a solution to the issue of anteroom installation at the last'HOG meeting, but a separate meeting between ARB and OHS to discuss it took place. What came out of that meeting was a proposal to continue with the original plan of reversing the air ?ow back into the animal holding areas and toinclude a recommendation (from ARE and other Programs) for the installationfuse of containment barriers as an additional level of protection. What I need from you is to respond either YES (for this proposal) or NO (against this proposal). Ifthere is no objection. then a memo will be sent out requesting FMEO to proceed accordingly. Thanksi USE. 5 25 devices would some from Note: As of yet. it has not been determined where the funding for the ?2r32aihi Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDINCIRD) Sent: Fridav, March 05, 2010 2:0? PM To: Damon, Inger K. (CDCIOIDINGEZID Massung. Robert (cocmlolNCEZID - Probst Paul E. (coolocooerSHE); Williams, Allison (cocmlomcezm) Subject: RE: Moving forward with Vivarium project Does FMEO have an idearof how long the vivarium will be shutdown for by going this route? Thanks, Laura - 'Stg?r?ifg?? (coclcmo/chveo) Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 2:03 PM To: Damon, Inger K. Massun Robert Probst, Paul E. Sable, Suraj Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCICCIDINCIRD) Subject: Moving forward with Vivarium project All, FMEO has asked that the HOG and OHS provide direction regarding the Vivarium project We were not able to agree to a solution to. the issue of anteroom installation at the last HOG meeting, but a separate meeting between ARE and OHS to discuss it took place. What came out of that meeting was a proposal to continue with the original plan of reversing the air ?ow back into the ., .ing areas and to include a recommendation (from ARB and other Programs) for the installationl'use containment barriers as an additional [eveI of protection. What I need from you is to respond either YES (for this proposal} or NO (against this proposal}. If there is no objection, then a memo will be sent out requesting FMEO to proceed accordingly. Thanks! '3 Note: As of yet, it has not been determined where the funding for the 25 devices would come from. 1003.142 '3 ELC. 262.200.- Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: Friday, March 05. 2010 2:03 PM To: Damon, lnger K. Massung, Robert Probst. Paul E. (cocrmomcaHsrP); Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDINCEZID): Zambuto. Laura R. Subject: Moving forward with Vivarium project All. FMEO has asked that the HUG and OHS provide direction regarding the Vivarium project. We were not able to agree to a solution to the issue of anteroom installation at the last HOG meeting, but a separate meeting between ARB and OHS to discuss it took place. What came out of that meeting was a proposal to continue with the original plan of reversing the air ?ow back into the olcing areas and to include a recommendation (from ARE and other Programs) for the installationl'use of ilbil3ii42 containment barriers as an additional level of protection. What i need from you is to respond either YES'(for this proposal} or NO (against this proposal). If there is no objection, then a memo will be sent out requesting FMEO to proceed accordingly. Thanks! Note: As of yet, it has not been determined where the funding for the devices would come from. SE: ?2523Ih Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Koch. Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 11:25 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI From; II I I II [3&5 gig?2 (CDCICCIDINCZVED) Sent: Friday, March 2009 8:56 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Koob, Stephen . (CDCIOCOOIBFOM (CDCIOCDOIOHS): Howard: William (Bill) Subject: Vivarium Keri, In the Ho . - sterday it was agreedfdecided that a project to explore the reversal of air flow in the Vivarium (to make the positive] would be It would improve safety and make working in the facility simpler and less laborious. Of course. such a project is FMEO's responsibility to evaluate and hopefully implement. If there is anything that the HOG can do to facilitate this process. please let us know and we will assist in any way we can. Thanks for our consideration. i C. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: .Frida Februe 26, 2010 9:43 AM To: its; licocrocoorosasi; Howard, William (em) (cocrocoorosasi Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels1 Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Fort Collins Vivarium air flow changes - IXOS CDC ?3ng KB Pat and Bill, [contacted Steve Koob as requested in our meeting on 2f23i'2010. Please see attached Fort Cc line rehalanre diagram and test and balance report that I received from Steve Koob- Anteroem is neutral and negative to ?23342 262 Air passes from Ef?gy: gm through the anteroom into animal holding. mg a Best Regards. . eel ATTDEICI 18 Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: email: Matisse! Please visit BFO Cgstomgr ?alisfaclion Survey and le ll us about your recent experiences with BFD. This survey is for internal CDC USE only,f and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey Mathe, Chester From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Monday. February 22, 2010 12:44 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: FW: Concerns regarding the building ivarium air reversal proposal From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 2:07 PM To: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCDOIBFD) lb Subject: FW: Concerns regarding the building ivan'um air reversal proposal 1 {3 Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tsoo Ciifion Rd. NE, Mail Stop K-ss Atlanta. GA 30333 Phone: Cell: 404-444-5281 e-maii: TBianchard@odo.gog From: Moss, Karen Sent: Fridalir February 05, 2010 1:25 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas Cc: Daniels, Charles E. (CDCJUCGDIBFO Subject: FW: Concerns regarding the air reversal proposal it Tom. Please see below Dr. Williams statement regarding the concerns ARB and the other programs have about the reversal of airflow being considered in the project 2009453 HVAC Modi?cations SSE Dirty Corridor. Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-532? Fall: Till-485L266? email: EMossl Please visit EEQ Satisfaction Survey: and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey.I is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey From: Williams, Allison Sent: Friday, February I05, 2010 12:Cc: Subject: Concerns regarding the Vivarium air reversal proposal Ms, MussI as discussed during our meeting yesterday and er unirr re quest, I am providing a statement explaining the concerns regarding the proposed air reversal project in the 35 Vivarium. We've talked with each program stakeholder and their concerns. if any. are also listed belo . It is our understanding that the original building design was for a system. All protocols, safety manuals and standard operating procedures are based on the current building design. While the concept presented appears ideal, it is not clear how changing the air flow will result In any bene?t to the programs, operationally or in terms of personnel safety. In our view, the corridor will still be dirty even if the airflow is reversed. Concerns include: - - Potential crossuoontamination of agents between rooms during waste management, personnel traf?c, equipment sharing etc. If cross contamination occurred, data would be compromised, valuable research may be lost, and cost to the programs involved may be high. - Operational impact of proposed project on daily operations and regarding waste management, personnel traf?c, equipment sharing, The corridor, while considered grey, is still technically dirty. Dirty caging and begged animal waste and carcass will still be transported down the common corridor gr'ior to autoclaving. A representative from each program was contacted. The representative from the pro ram expressed little concern if the reversal of air flow results in identical conditions as are currently in building The groupie enthusiastic about the change (as is ARES) if it means being able to move equipment, supplies and personnel without the need to autoc'iave"'o"r shower between rooms as indicated by OHS. However, it is not clear howthis operational change would be implemented safely or how cross contamination will be prevented. The Tuberculo?is orcqram is under the impression that the reversal of flow is accompanied with the construction of a wall to separate the ?31(33742 space from the animal holding area to ensure air from the corridor is not dispersed into their room. U-S-C- 5 252a We want to make sure the decision to move forward with the project as requested has been well thought out, all aspects are considered and the programs are aware of the impact. Please let me know if additional information is needed. As discussed, I will request this topic be added as an agenda item for the next regularly schedule HOG meeting. Very respectfully, ?ifison Wif?ams, DVM 1600 Clifton Road, MS 8-15 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 404-639-3316 (of?ce) 404-639-3793 (fax) runs; :12 E??arh insst42 252m. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday. February 22, 2010 12:40 PM T9: Williams, Jeffe OIBFO) I ?'u'ij?ects . -- HVAC Mod January 6th Meeting Minutes use. 9252a Thanks, Paul 404-63943505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCICCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 1:36 PM To: Powell, Nathaniel Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. Zambuto, Laura P. Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Ford Maria Cristina Williams, Allison 'It'"'31 William P. Cc: Lingler, Arthur Ft. Ty star?sh; (CDCIOCOOIBFO) - . i it HVAC Mod 2626 January 6th Meeting Mlnu es All, Attached are my meeting notes from our January 6th meeting. Please let me know if you have any corrections or additions. I -1- ?sh P2009453 I Hvac Mod . Regards, Karen Moss F. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 of?ce.- Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: ??0-488?2567 email; KMossJ @Gdcgov Please visit BFD Customer Satisfacrion Survev and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey o; nun-J, e? "Fa-g Re? Jr, WEIR HEALTHIER PEOPLE- MEETING MINUTES Center for Disease Control and Prevention Date: January 6, 2009 . . USU. ?525 AC Modi?cation ect: P2009453 Location: 2523'?? Conference Room use. ?252 Attendees: Karen Moss DEMO Laura Zambuto - Paul Probst FMEO Christine Ford FMEO Mike Campbell - CIMO Bill Howard - OHS Dr. Allison Williams ARE Dr. Nate Powell ARE [burs-=42 8.0. 2623 OHS P3111 Nogueira MO The purpose of this meeting was for OHS to discuss with ARE the HVAC Modi?cations to use. 262a(h} Discussion: 1. Per_ current air?ow into does not follow proper biocontainment procedures. Fort Collins air?ow was reversed as is requested in this oroiect. 2- (b)(3)242 U.S.C. 262mm 3. ARB stated their procedures would not change; they would continue to change PPE and shower between programs. use. 252mm {33:42 U-S-C- 2523{?} ?1 1 re lied tnattne roceoure wou Changa use. 2523(h) use. 252mm Dr. Powell asked how personnel would know that dirty cages were in the corridor. Pat replied that some type of coordination procedure would have to written so that personnel do not get put at risk. - 6. Dr Powell asked for a risk assessment to be written by OHS. Dr. Powell has monumental concerns about this coordination procedure and the procedures. U'l 7. stated the shelving in the ?gray? corridor was intended for storage of clean PPE. 8. Dr. Powell asked which is more ?gray?; the corridor or the anteroorn to the shower area. replied the corridor is considered to be the ?grayest?. 9. Laura Zambuto stated that this air ?ow directional change is an advantage 1 because this would enable them to move equipment from one room to another and eliminate the requirement for redundant equipment. They could move equipment from one [El room to anotheroom; but not to different labs such as to TB. 10. Dr. Powell asked for minutes of this meeting to be given to Dr. Black. 11. Dr. Powell asked the select agent be noti?ed as soon as possible about the change in the procedure and that the}r review the procedure. Select agent would want sequence of operations to be written OHS. 12. Dr William asked if an anteroom could be built between the and animal holding. IE replied that would be too expensive. ARB procedures would change if an anteroom existed. 13. Karen Moss stated that airflow from de?con room into U-S-C- could not be guaranteed since there would he no future exhaust in ?gray? corridor. The decision was made to build an anteroom to the dc-con room. Air would flow from secondary entry into de-con room and from the new ante room into tie-con room. 14. When the incinerator is fired air from clean corridor 3 sucked into the incinerator room; disrupting the air flow into the procedure and anterooms off this It - corridor. The incinerator issue needs to be resolved along with this project. was okay with adding a diffuser to corridor between the clean corridor and incinerator room. 15- Outage date to slip to May; Laura Zambuto to con?rm dates. Also need to check with thand TB programs about upcoming andfor ongoing projects. US Maths, Chester (cocrocoorosspi From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:56 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (coo; cooreFO} Subject: FW: air flow reversal in vivarium IXOS CDC 556 KB Attachments: placeholdertmp 9,47,37,13 PauL Sorry, I meant to copy you on this. Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Tito-433830? Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: email: KMossI@cdc.gov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursda March 18, 2010 4:04 PM .. . Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jefferv Black, Carolyn Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, us Subject: Fw: air ?ow reversal in vivarium Please see below correspondence. As the FCC for the HOG. it's important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached file is an updated airflow diagram from whatl have seen in the past. The anteroom to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroom (green areaconcern from an engineering standpoint, because air will not flow as indicated in the diagram when the irflow is reversed. Also, there are some concerns mentioned in Steve Milby's e-mail that are not addressed in either the directive or the attached diagram. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 once: rroaas-ss or Cell: 404-325-5327 Fax: truss-255? email: From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:58 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. (cocrocoo/seo); Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David Milby, Stephen c. (cocmcocyaFO) $1,314, Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in JB vivarium Dr. Black, I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the project request that was submitted to BFO. Please let me know if you have any questions that we can answer. Pat and I will be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issue. Thank You. William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader i Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 6?8.614.725? wch3@cdc.gov From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:39 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOJBFO Cc: Moss, Karen (cociocoO/OHS); Howard, William (Bill) (coo/ocooroHS); Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCICIC Nicholson, Janet - - - ibiis'i42 - . Subject. RE. air ?ow reversal] [32 vivarium Thank you for this thoughtful response, Steve. Bill, Karen: would one or more of you be able to provide us with a diagram showing the direction of the air flows after the proposed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below in Steve's email including the changing area at the end of the hallway? Once we all have this information, perhaps a meeting to go over the information would be helpful? i understand that you all have already spent a lot of time discussing this but i would appreciate your clari?cation on the air flow directions for my own understanding. This information is needed to sopport efforts on the part of DSR staff to prepare new SOPs for the animal husbandry tasks. Thanks, Carolyn From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:25 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOKBFO): (coc/ocooroHS); Howard, William [Bill] Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in vivarium Dr. Black, I would be happy to talk to you and share whatl have heard if you would like. This is obviously a complex issue and your question is a good one. My understanding is that the most recent Ian is to make the centrai corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anterooms. According to the DEMO engineer responsible for the project, there has been no ?nal direction on how pressure in the central corridor would retate to the changing area. She also has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the clean side of the cage decontamination autoclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the West side. It might be helpful for you to speak to Karen. Bill Howard or about the final direction on these questions. I There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms if SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding rooms support protections against cross contamination from the central corridor back into other holding rooms. if the issue of turbulence at the holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and it the pressure retationships between the central corridor and the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal opinion is that the changing area. clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor should remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas, even if the central corridor is positive to the holding rooms. Karen is trying to understand and coordinate all of the diverse thoughts on this issue, and is more knowledgeable about the current status of the discussions than I am. Bill and would also be good sources of information for you. support the need to have the views of the ARB staff that work in the area be heard, and that proper SOPs be developed to match any changes to the airflow in this area to make sure that working protocols reflect the new conditions. Thanks. Steve From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:42 AM To: Stephen C. Subject: air ?ow reversal in vivarium Importance: High Hello. Steve: have been discussing this issue with several people within and outside of my division and was hoping you could answer a question for us. After the proposed airflow reversal in the vivarium is accomplished, what will be the status of the changing roomtshower area that is at the end of the hallway that is now ?dirty? but will become "gray" with the air flow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative with respect to the "gray" hallway? Thanks very much, Carolyn Comfy?! Hack, PILD. Director Division of Scienti?c Resources National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases CDC (404} 639-3466 [4 04) 539-21 55 tax cblack@cdc.gov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:4? PM TO: Walpole, Kenneth K. DCIDC Subject: Fw: air?ow reversal in vivarium Sent from my BIackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Moss, Karen To: Black, Carolyn Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, ThomasM. Williams, Jeffery Milb Stehen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCDOIBFD) Sent: Thu Mar 18 16:45:00 2010 Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in vivarium Bill and will have to verify but I believe the}: are out all next week in training. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Coll: 404-325?32? Fax; email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursda March 18, 2010 4:44 PM Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Milby Stehen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) ib}l?3] 42 Subject: RE: air flow revErsal in vivarium a Thanks I would be very pleased to participate and learn more. Carolyn From: . Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:37 PM . To: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn - Mil Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. (coo/ocoolsrmi (cocrocoolOHS); Probst, Paul E. lbll3l Subject: RE: alr flow reversal in 2,323,?? vlvarlum All, A meeting to go over the options to redirecting the air ?ow is desperately needed. I believe that a solution can be (or has arrived at. A Monday meeting would be very helpful to move this forward. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursda March 18, 2010 4:04 PM er: 7 lift-Id Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOKBFOM Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Milby, Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. CDCKOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: air flow reversal in vivarium IlZIl?l?l- Please see below correspondence. As the P00 for the HOG, it?s important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached ?le is an updated air?ow diagram from what I have seen in the past. The anteroom to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroom (green area) to the shower area is a concern from an engineering standpoint, because air will not flow as Indicated in the diagram when the dirty corridor?s airflow is reversed. Also, there are some concerns mentioned in Steve Milby's e-mail that are notaddressed in either the directive or the attached diagram. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404?325-6327 Fax: ?ll?438266? email: KMossl @odc.gov From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:58 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen (coo/ocooxosst; Blanchard, Thomas M. Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCIOCODIDHS): Holmes, David Milby, Stephen C. tbll3l'42 Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in 5535,? vivarium Dr. Black, I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the project request that was submitted to BFO. Please let me know if you have any questions that we can answer. Pat and I will be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issue. Thank You. William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 5?8.614.725? wch3@cdc.gov From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2010 9:39 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. Cc: M055. Karen Howard, William (Bill) (cociocooionsy Blanchard, Thomas M. Nicholson, Janet Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in vivarium Thank you for this thoughtful response, Steve. Bill, Karen: would one or more of you be able to provide us with a diagram showing the direction of the air flows after the proposed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below in Steve's email including the changing area at the end of the hallway? Once we all have this information, perhaps a meeting to go over the information would be helpful? i understand that you all have already spent a lot of time discussing this but I would appreciate your clari?cation on the air flow directions for my own understanding. This information is needed to support efforts on the part of staff to prepare new SOPs for the animal husbandry tasks. Thanks, Carolyn From: Stephen C. Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:25 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen (morocco/am); (coo/ocooionsy Howard, William (Bill) (coqocoox0H5); Blanchard, Thomas M. . . . i3l42 . . Subject: RE: air flow reversal In LECE vivarium Dr. Black, I would be happy to talk to you and share what I have heard if you would like. This is obviously a complex issue and your question is a good one. My understanding is that the most recent plan is to make the central corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anterooms. According to Karen Moss, the DEMO engineer responsible for the project, there has been no ?nal direction on how pressure in the central corridor would relate to the changing area. She also has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the clean side of the cage decontaminaLiQ?l'autoclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the Weslside. It might be helpful for you to speak to Karen, Bill Howard otli?i'? about the ?nal direction on these questions. There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms if SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding roorns support protections against cross contamination from the central corridor back into other holding rooms, if the issue of turbulence atthe holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and if the pressure relationships between the central corridor and the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal opinion is that the changing area, clean side ofthe decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor should remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas, even if the central corridor is positive to the holding rooms. Karen is trying to understand and coordinate all of the diverse thoughts on this issue, and is more knowledgeable about the current status of the discussions than i am. Bill and would also be good sources of information for you. I support the need to have the views of the ARB staff that work in the area be heard, and that proper SOPs be developed to match any changes to the airflow in this area to make sure that working protocols reflect the new conditions. Thanks, Steve From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:42 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. 0) Subject: air ?ow reversal in vivariurn Importance: High ?Wm Hello, Steve: I have been discussing this issue with several people within and outside of my division and was hoping you could ansv?er a question for us. After the proposed airflow reversal in the vivarium is accomplished, what will be the status of the changing roomishower area that is at the end of the hallway that is now "dirty" but will become ?gray? with the air flow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative With respect to the "gray" hallway? Thanks very much. Carolyn Black, PILD. Director Division of Scienti?c Resources National Center for Emerging and Zoonotio Infectious Diseases CDC {404) 6139-34-66 639-2155 fax chlack@odc.gov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (coolocomeFo) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:45 PM To: Black, Carolyn Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. {CoClocoolleFol; Williams, Jeffery lvliloy, Stephen C. Holmes David Daniels, Charles E. (CDClocoOleFO); Prob ul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. vivarium I lb_:tI3_:~ and will have to verify butl believe they are out all next week in training. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?oe: 770-433-5307 Cell: 404-325-6 327 Fax: ?ll-435466? email: KM ass I @cdc.gov From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursda March 18, 2010 4:44 PM -- --Z Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Milbv Stehen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. Probst. Paul E. Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in hldg. Vivarium Thanks, mas: I would be very pleased to participate and learn more. Carolyn From: DID NCZV ED) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:3? PM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Black, Carolyn Milb Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. Pro-bat, Paul E. (cocrocoolsFO) an Subject: RE: air flow reversal in :32} Vivarium All, A meeting to go over the options to redirecting the air flow is desperately needed. I believe that a solution can be (or has been) arrived at. A Monday meeting would be very helpful to move this forward. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDUIBFO) Ser 18, 2010 4:04 PM To: '?ii?i Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery 1 Black, Carolyn Milbv, Stephen C. Holmes, David (coqocoomHS); Daniels, Charles E. morocco/arc) Subject: FW: air ?ow reversal in bldg. vivarium lh_:rEl_: Please see below correspondence. As the P00 for the HOG. it?s important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached ?le is an Updated airflow diagram from what I have seen in the past. The anteroom to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroom (green area) to the shower area is a concern from an engineering standpoint, because air will not flow as indicated in the diagram when the dirty corridor's airflow is reversed. Also, there are some concerns mentioned in Steve Milby's e-mail that are not addressed in either the directive or the attached diagram. Regards1 Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce; Ceil: 404-825-6332? Fax: noses-ass? email: KMosst @cdcgov From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:58 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen we I Blanchard, Thomas M. Nicholson, Janet Holmes, David Milbv, Stephen C. {m Subject: RE: air flow reversal in 42 Dr. Black, I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the project request that was submitted to BFO. Please let me know if you have any questions that we can answer. Pat and I will be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issue. Thank You. William Howard CDC Facility. Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.21?4 6?8.614.?257 wch3@cdc.gov From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:39 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. Cc: Moss, Karen (cocrocoorsrol; Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocooroHS), 2 Blanchard, Thomas M. Nicholson, Janet Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg.vivariUm Thank you for this thoughtful response Bill i' it aren: would one or more of you be able to provide us with a diagram showing the direction of the air flows after the proposed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below in Steve's email including the changing area at the end of the hallway? Once we all have this information, perhaps a meeting to go over the information would be helpful? understand that you all have already spent a lot of time discussing this but I would appreciate your clari?cation on the air ?ow directions for my own understanding. This information is needed to support efforts on the part of 08R staff to prepare new SOPs for the animal husbandry tasks. Thanks, Carolyn From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:25 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen (cocrocoorsroii Howard, William (am) (cob/ocooronsi; Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. vivarium Dr. Black, I would be happy to talk to you and share what I have heard if you would like. This is obviously a complex issue and your question is a good one. My understanding is that the most recent plan is to make the central corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anteroonis. According to Karen Moss, the DEMO engineer responsible for the project, there has been no ?nal direction on how pressure in the central corridor would relate to the changing area. She also has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the clean side of the cage decontamina utoclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the West side. It might be helpful for you to speak to Karen, Bill Howard 0 about the ?nal direction on these questions. There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms if SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding rooms support protections against cross contamination from the central corridor back into other holding rooms, if the issue of turbulence at the holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and ifthe pressure relationships between the central corridor and the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal opinion is that the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor should remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas, even if the central corridor is positive to the holding rooms. 5 trying to understand and coordinate all of the diverse thoughts on this issue, and is more knowledgeable about the current status of the discussions than 1 am. [El andwould also be good sources of information for you. support the need to have the views of the ARB staff that work in the area be heard, and that proper SOPs be developed to match any changes to the air?ow in this area to make sure that working protocols re?ect the new conditions. Thanks, Steve From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:42 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. Subject: air flow reversal in bldg. vivarium Importance: High Hello, Steve: have been discussing this issue with several people within and outside of my division and was hoping you could answer a question for us. After the proposed air flow reversal in the vivarium is accomplished, what will be the status of the changing roomfshower area that is at the end of the hallway that is now ?dirty" but will become "grayf? with the air ?ow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative with respect to the ?grayf' hallway? Thanks very much, Carolyn Carolyn M: Black, PILD. Director Division of Scienti?c Resources National Center ior Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious DiseaSes CBS {404} 639-3466 {404) 639-2155 fax chlack@ cdcgov Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEF) From: Black, Carolyn (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: - - - 8, 2010 4:44 PM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William . . Blanchard. Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Milby, Stephen C. Holmes David Daniels, Charles E. (cocrocooeFO); Probst ul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bidg. ivarium Thanks, i would be very pleased to participate and learn more. Carolyn From: mills; Sent: ihursday, March 1 2010 4:3? PM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Milt] Stephen C. Holmes, David (coprocoolOHS); Daniels, Charles E. (coprocoosto); (encrocooroasx Prohst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) lei Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in vivarium All. A meeting to go over the options to redirecting the air flow is desperately needed. i believe that a solution can be (or has rrived at. A Mondayr meeting would be very helpful to move this forward. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2010 4:CDCXOIDINCZVED) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Milby, Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. CICCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: air flow reversal in bldg. vivarium lh?IEIi Please see below correspondence. As the FCC for the HOG, it's important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached file is an updated airflow diagram from what I have seen in the past. The anteroom to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroom (green area) to the shower area is a concern from an engineering standpoint, because air will not ?ow as indicated in the diagram when the airflow is reversed. Also, there are some concerns mentioned in Steve Milby's email that are not addressed in either the directive or the attached diagram. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. M3 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: 170-433-2551 email: From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCKOCOOIOHS) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:58 AM To: Biack, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen (cocrocoorero); (coo/ocooiorlS); Blanchard, Thomas M. (cocrocoo/arol; Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David Milby, Stephen c. (CDCIDCOOKBFO) ,b Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. lvivarium Dr. Black, I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the project request that was submitted to BFO. Please let me know if you have any questions that we can answer. mo; and I will be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issue. Thank You. William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Office of Health and Safety 404.539.21?4 6?8.614.7257 wch3@cdc.gov From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2010 9:39 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. I Cc: Moss, Karen ?to I (cocyocooioHS); Howard, William (Bill) (CDC/ocoorOHsl; Blanchard, Thomas M. Nicholson, Janet i3) Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. vivarium Thank you for this thoughtful response, Steve. Bill,Karen: would one or more of you be able to provide us with a diagram showing the direction of the air flows after the proposed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below in Steve's email including the changing area at the end of the hallway? Once we all have this information, perhaps a meeting to go over the information would be helpful? I understand that you all have already spent a lot of time discussing this but I would appreciate your clarification on the air flow directions for my own understanding. This information is needed to support efforts on the part of DSR staff to prepare new SOPs for the animal husbandry tasks. Than ks, Carolyn From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:25 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen (cocrocooxeso); Howard, William (Bill) (cociocooroHS); Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg.vivarium Dr. Black, I would be happy to talk to you and share what I have heard ifyou would like. This is obviously a complex issue and your question is a good one. My understanding is that the most recent plan is to make the central corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anterooms. According to Karen Moss, the DEMO engineer responsible for the project, there has been no ?nal 2 direction on how pressure in the central corridor would relate to the changing area. She also has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the clean side of the cage decontamination autoclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the West side. It might be helpful for you to speak to Karen, Bill Howard 0 about the ?nal direction on these questions. There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms it SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding rooms support protections against cross contamination from the central corridor back into other holding rooms. if the issue of turbulence at the holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and if the pressure reiationships between the central corridor and the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal opinion is that the changing area. clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor shouid remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas, even if the central corridor is positive to the holding rooms. is trying to understand and coordinate all of the 1] I. thoughts on this issue, and is more knowledgeable about the current status of the discussions than i am. Bill and would also be good sources of information for you. I suPport the need to have the views of the ARB staff that work in the area be heard, and that proper SOPs be developed to match any changes to the air?ow in this area to make sure that working protocols reflect the new conditions. Thanks, Steve From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:42 AM To: Miibv, Stephen C. 0) Subject: air flow reversal in Didg?vivarium Importance: High 3 Hello. Steve: 1 have been discussing this issue with several people within and outside of my division and was hoping you could answer a question for us. After the proposed air ?ow reversal in the vivarium is accomplished, what will be the status of the changing roomfshower area that is at the end of the hallway that is now ?dirty? but will become "gray" with the air ?ow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative with respect to the ?gray? hallway? Thanks very much, Carolyn Carolyn Black, PILD. Director Division ofScienti?c Resources National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases CDC {4043 sass-res (404} 539-2155 fax cblack@cdc.gov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Thursday. March 18,2010 4:39 PM To: Probst, Paul E. {b Subject: Re: airflow reversal in bldg. i vivarium Why are we still debating this in emails. We sent this to dr. black to help her understand. is again debating stuff outside the chain without any:r type of consulting. Everyone knows there are issues to be worked out. I think it is time we request a new engineer. Itlii'EiI 4:1 US Cl ?2523tlli To: Imr?': 'bll'?i Proiosbr Paul E. Sent: Thu Mar 18 16:33:22 2010 m) Subject: FW: air flow reversal in bldg.vivarium FYI From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursda March 18, 2010 4:04 PM To: CDCIOIDINCZVED) Cc: -. ijrl?i- Blanchard, Thomas M. Willia% Back, Carolyn Milbv, Stephen C. 'Dt?i (coqocoomHS); Daniels, Charles E. CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: air flow reversal in bldg.vivarium r- Ib_:t0j: Please see below correspondence. As the P00 tor the HOG, it's important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached ?le is an updated airflow diagram from what i have seen in the past. The anieroom to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroom (green area} to the shower area is a concern from an engineering standpoint. because air will not ?ow as indicated in the diagram when the ain?low is reversed. Also. there are some concerns mentioned in e-mail that are not addressed in either the directive or the attached diagram. Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1800 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Tim-48 8-830? Cell: 404.325.5327 Fax: 270-488-265? email: KMossl @cdcgov From: ME: Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:58 AM In To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen (coo/ocooxaFO); (cocrocooxonsx Blanchard, Thomas M. (coc/ocoorsFO); Nicholson, Janet Gaunce Jean A. Holmes, David Milby, Stephen C. Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. vivarium 2 Dr. Black, I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the project request that was submitted to BFO. Please let me know if you have any questions that we can answer. Pat and I will be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issue. Thank You. William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Office of Health and Safety 404.639.21M wch3@cdc.gov From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:39 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO Cc: Moss, Karen (cocrocoo/aFO); (coclocoomHS); Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDIOD) Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. vivarium Thank you for this thoughtful response, Steve. Bill, Karen: would one or more of you be able to provide us with a diagram showing the direction of the air flows after the proposed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below in Steve's email including the changing area at the end of the hallway? Once we all have this information. perhaps a meeting to go over the information would be helpful? understand that you all have already spent a lot of time discussing this but would appreciate your clari?cation on the air flow directions for my own understanding. This information is needed to support efforts on the part of DSR staff to prepare new SOPs for the animal husbandry tasks. - Thanksl Carolyn From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:25 AM To: Black, Carolyn cc: Moss, Karen (cocxocooxaFO); (cocrocooxoiis); Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocooxonsx Blanchard, Thomas M. .- Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. vivarium is Dr. Black. i would be happy to talk to you and share whatl have heard if you would like. This is obviously a complex issue and your question is a good one. My understanding is that the most recent plan is to make the central corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anterooms. According to Karen Moss, the DEMO engineer responsible for the project, there has been no ?nal direction on how pressure in the central corridor would relate to the changing area. She also has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the clean side of the cage decontamination autoclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the West side. It might be helpful for you to speak to Karen, Bil] Howard or about the ?nal direction on these questions. There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms if SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding rooms support protections against cross contamination from the central corridor back into other holding rooms, if the issue of turbulence at the holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and if the pressure relationships between the central corridor and the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal opinion is that the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor should remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas, even if the central corridor is positive to the holding rooms. Karen is trying to understand and coordinate all of the - se thoughts on this issue. and is more knowledgeable about the current status of the discussions than i am. Bill an ?it'ii would also be good sources of information for you. I support the need to have the views of the ARB staff that work in the area be heard, and that proper SOPs be developed to match any changes to the air?ow in this area to make sure that working protocols re?ect the new conditions. Thanks, Steve From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:42 AM To: itlilby,r Stephen C. (CDCIUCOO 0) Subject: air ?ow reversal in Edg?vivarium Importance: High Hello, Steve: I have been discussing this issue with several people within and outside or" my division and was hoping you could answer a question for us. After the proposed airflow reversal in the vivarium is accomplished. what will be the status of the changing roomtshower area that is at the end of the hallway that is now ?dirty? but will become "gray" with the air ?ow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative with respect to the ?gray? hallway? Thanks very much, Carolyn Combo: Black, Director Division of Scienti?c Resources National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases CDC .. r4o4} 639-3463 (so-t) 639-21 55 fax cblack@cdc.gov Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: I wet?: kcoorommcezro) Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2010 4:3? PM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFOE Black, Carolyn Milby, Stephen C. Holmes David 1 Daniels, Charles e. (cocrocoorsFoi; Prob. lb.? at E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: air flow reversal in f3: vivarium 42 All, A meeting to go over the options to redirecting the air flow is desperately needed. I believe that a solution can be (or has beenl arrived at. A Monday meeting would be very helpful to move this forward. From: Moss, Karen Thursda March 18, 2010 4:04 PM us c: ?2523Im Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Milby, Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. CIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: air ?ow reversal in bldg. Vivarium I'tillEE- Please see below correspondence. As the FCC for the HOG, it?s important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached ?le is an updated airflow diagram from whatt have seen in the past. The anteroom to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroom (green area] to the a concern from an engineering standpoint, because air will not ?ow as indicated in the diagram when the Ilbtlali?? air?ow is reversed. Also, there are some concerns mentioned in Steve Milby?s email that are not a resse in either the directive or the attached diagram. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Tim-408.830? Celt: 404025682? ax: WEI-48345 57 email: KMossl?icdc. gov From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:58 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Nicholson, Janet Gaunce Jean A. Holmes, David Milby, Stephen C. ?3 Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. vivarium Dr. Black, I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the project request that was submitted to BFO. Please let me know if you have any questions that we can answer. Pat and I will be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issue. Thank You. William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.21?4 88.614325? wch3@cdc.gov From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:39 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. . Cc: Moss, Karen (cocrocoozaFO); Howard, William (Bill) (coo/ocooloHS); Blanchard, Thomas M. Nicholson, Janet Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg.vivarium Thank you for this thoughtful response, would one or more of you be able to provide us with a diaram showing the direction of the air flows after - the proposed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below in email including the changing area at the end of the hallway? Once we all have this information, perhaps a meeting to go over the infonnalion would be helpful? I understand that you all have already spent a lot of time discussing this but I would appreciate your clari?cation on the air flow directions for my own understanding. This information is needed to support efforts on the part of DSR staff to prepare new SOPs for the animal husbandry tasks. Then its, Carolyn From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:25 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen (coo/ocoo/OHSJ; Howard, William (Bill) (coc/ocooloHS); Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: air flow reversal in Dr. Black, I would be happy to talk to you and share what i have heard it you would like. This is obviously a complex issue and your question is a good one. My understanding is that the most recent plan is to make the central corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anterooms. According to Karen Moss, the DEMO engineer responsible for the project, there has been no final direction on how pressure in the central corridor would relate to the changing area. She also has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the clean side of the cage decontamination autoclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the West side. it might be helpful for you to speak to Karen, Bill Howard about the ?nal direction on these questions. There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms if SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding rooms support protections against cross contamination from the central corridor back into other holding rooms, if the issue of turbulence at the holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and if the pressure relationships between the central corridor and the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal 2 opinion is that the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor should remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas. even if the central corridor is positive to the holding rooms- Karen is trying to understand and coordinate all of the C1 se thoughts on this issue, and is more knowledgeable about the current status of the discussions than I am. IE and. would also be good sources of information for you. I support the need to have the views of the ARB staff that work in the area be heard, and that proper SOPs be devetoped to match any changes to the air?ow in this area to make sure that working protocols re?ect the new conditions. Thanks, Steve From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18,, 2010 8:42 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. - Subject: air ?ow reversal in btdg. Importance: High Hello, Steve: I have been discussing this issue with several people within and outside of my division and was hoping you could answer a question for us. After the proposed air ?ow reversal in the vivari?um is accomplished, what will be the status of the changing roomtshower area that is at the end of the hallway that is now "dirty" butwill become ?gray? with the air flow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative with respect to the ?gray? hallway? Thanks very much, Carolyn Comfy? Black, PILD. Director Division ofScienti?c Resources National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases CDC [4(14) 639-3456 (404} 639-2155 fax colack@odc.gov Mathe, Chester (cocrocoorossp) From: USS @2622:th Sent: Thursda March 18, 2010 4:33 PM To: {cocroco Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoorsFoi {bl Subject: FW: air flow reversal in bldg. ivarium - CDC 553 KB Attachments: placeholder.trnp 42 u. FYI From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursda March 18, 2010 4:04 PM - Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Milby, Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. Subject: FW: air ?ow reversal in bldg. vivarium (3 Please see below correspondence. As the P00 for the HOG, it?s important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached ?le is an updated airflow diagram from what I have seen in the past. The anteroom to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroorn (green area) to the shower area is a concern from an engineering standpoint, becaUse air will not flow as indicated in the diagram when the dirty corridors air?ow is reversed. Also, there are some concerns mentioned in Steve Milby's e?mail that are not addressed in either the directive or the attached diagram. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-97 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: rro-4ss-ssor Cell: 404-825-6327 Fax: email: KMossi?cdcgov From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:58 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen (cocrocoorBFo): Blanchard, Thomas M. (cocrocoorsFO); Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David (CDCIOCOOJOHS): Milhy, Stephen c. (cocrocooleFo) to) Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. {:32 vivarium Dr. Black, I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the project request that was submitted to BFO. Please let me know if you have any questions that we can answer. Pat and I will be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issue. Thank You. William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 6?8.614.?25? wch3@cdc.gov From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2010 9:39 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO I Cc: Moss, Karen mm (morocco/0H5); Howard, William (Bill) (coo/ocoomHS); Blanchardl Thomas M. (CDCIDC Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDIDD) Subject: RE: air flow reversal in 42 rivarium Thank you for this thoughtful response. Steve. Karen: would one or more of you be able to provide us with a diagram showing the direction of the air flows after the proposed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below in Steve's email including the changing area at the end of the hallway? Once we all have this information, perhaps a meeting to go over the information would be helpful? I understand that you all have already spent a lot of time discussing this but] would appreciate your clari?cation on the air flow directions for my own understanding. This information is needed to support efforts on the part of DSR staff to prepare new SDPs for the animal husbandry tasks. Thanks. Carolyn From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCODXBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:25 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen (cociocooisroy (cociocooioHS); Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCJOC DIBF Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in 42 ivarium *2 Dr. Black, I would be happy to talk to you and share what I have heard if you would like. This is obviously a complex issue and your question is a good one. My understanding is that the most recent plan is to make the central corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anterooms. According to Karen Moss, the DEMO engineer responsible for the project. there has been no ?nal direction on how pressure in the central corridor would relate to the changing area. She also has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the clean side of the cage decontamina utoclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the Westside. It might be helpful for you to speak to Karen. Bill Howard 0 about the final direction on these questions. There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms if SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding rooms support protections against cross contamination from the central corridor back into other holding rooms, if the issue of turbulence at the holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and if the pressure relationships between the central corridor and the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal opinion is that the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor should remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas, even if the central corridor is positive to the holding rooms. Karen is trying to understand and coordinate all of the thoughts on this issue, and is more knowledgeable about the current status ofthe discussions than I am. Bill an would also be good sources of information for you. support the need to have the views ofthe ARE: staffthat work in the area be heard, and that proper SOPs be developed to match any changes to the airflow in this area to make sure that working protocols re?ect the new conditions. Thanks, Steve From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:42 AM To: Milbv, Staphen C. Subject: air flow reversal in vivarium Importance: High Hello, Steve: I have been discussing this issue with several people within and outside of my division and was hoping you could answer a question for us. After the proposed air flow reversal in the vivariurn is accomplished, what will be the status of the changing roomishower area that is at the end of the hallway that is now "dirty" but will become ?gray? with the air ?ow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative with respect to the ?gray? hallway? Thanks very much, Carolyn Cart?er M. Black, Director Division of Scienti?c Resources National Center for Emerging and Zoo notic infectious Diseases CDC [4043 639-3456 [404) 639-2155 fax chlack@cdc.gov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFW Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 10:08 To: Moss, Karen Cc: Tanya A. Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOJBFOL WilliamsI Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Gaunce. Jean A. ?3 262 Modi?cations Thank you, (3.- From: Moss, Karen Se - .16, 2010 9:35 AM To: thy-'55? I Cc: Tanya A. Daniels, Charles E. Williams, Jeffery 42933 dler, George (C F?mm?mmi' Pro-hat Pal I E. Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCIOCOOKOHS) 252mm Subject: 92009453- flit?: ma anc Modi?cations You have been designated as the point of contact (see below) for all communications regarding the HOG for the above referenced project. Any project information that may affect the programsistakeholders will be funneled through you for circulation and coordination among the HOG members. Likewise, please ensure that you share with me any input from HOG members that may affect this project. The schedule put forth in the recent HOG directive is very aggressive. Good communication and coordination among all are critical if we are to execute a successful project. Also, please relay this revised means of communication to all HOG members. Thank you, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770433?330? Cell: 404-825-632? Fax: email: KMossl From: Chandler, George Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 5:11 PM To: Nicholson, Janet :r Jeffery Gaunce, Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. BerEch, Tanya A. Monroe, Steve (CDCIOIDINCZVEW Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Thanks, From: Nicholson, Janet Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 2:32 PM Team Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeery Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Subject: Re: P2009453 - HOG Directive Tony is the appropriate contact. Sent from my BlacKBerry Wireless Device From: To: Chandier, George Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Sent: Fri Mar 12 13:52:42 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive George, 1 am happy to be the POC for Karen on this project, but would leave the ultimate decision up to Jan. Thanks for your nce. From: Chandler, George Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:48 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Friends: I hope there is no basic misunderstanding of support for the project and decision to move forward as requested by OHS and the HOG. Karen is trying to foilow our SOP to keep affected parties informed on the project and to solicit information that might affect scope, schedule and budget. i have been informed that there are dissenting voices on this project and that some Program folks feel that their concerns have not been addressed. At the same time, I am fully aware that OHS and the Program have used a process to generate this project request. and that there can be dissenting voices as long as the dissenter's legitimate concerns have been taken into account. It is not BFO's intent to intrude deeply into Program issues .- just to clearly communicate what is going on relative to the Project. So, 8r. Jan, if there is a single POO for Karen to solicit Program input from and to disseminate project information back to the Program, please designate herfhim if you have not done so already. Please be advised that this POC will! be responsible for and will need to handle internal communications and coordination for all affected Program components in order for BFD to have a chance of meeting most of the scope and schedule on this .. Discuss? Thanks! Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: 2010 9:35 AM To: nc:r3}:42 US C. '33 252cm: Cc: Tanya A. Daniels, Charles E- WilliamsI Jeffery Chandler. George Probst, Paul E. oe Jean A. CDCJOCOOIOSHE) Subject: P2009453 ear? Sit r?Mm 1:43 HVAC Modi?cations Stet; You have been designated as the point of contact (see below} for all communications regarding the HOG for the above referenced project. Any project information that may affect the will be funneled through you for circulation and coordination among the HOG members. Likewise. please ensure that you share with me any input from HOG members that may affect this project. The schedule put forth in the recent HOG directive is very aggressive. Good communication and coordination among all are critical if we are to execute a successful project Also, please relay this revised means of communication to all HOG members. Thank you1 Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officers Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce; Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: 720?438-266? email: rr'?cdcgoy From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 5:11 PM To: Nicholson, Janet Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Thanks, Jan! From: Nicholson, Janet Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 2:32 PM Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve (CDCIOIDINCZVED) Subject: Re: P2009453 HOG Directive the appropriate contact. Sent from my BlacKBerry Wireless Device To: Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Nicholson, Janet (cocromjoo); Gaunce, Jean A. (coo/ocoomHS) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Sent: Fri Mar 12 13:52:42 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive George, I am happy to be the P00 for Karen on this project. but would leave the ultimate decision up to Jan. Thanks for your . Ann-1 a. se- Iona; vandalism-me- Frorn: Chandler, George Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:48 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCJOCOOIDHS) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Subject: RE: P2009453 HOG Directive Friends: I hope there is no basic misunderstanding of support for the project and decision to move forward as requested by OHS and the HOG. is trying to follow our SOP to keep affected parties informed on the project and to solicit information that might affect scope, schedule and budget. I have been informed that there are dissenting voices on this project and that some Program folks feel that their concerns have not been addressed. At the same time, I am fully aware that OHS and the Program have used a process to generate this project request, and that there can be dissenting voices as long as the dissenter?s legitimate concerns have been taken into account. It is not intent to intrude deeply into Program issues just to clearly communicate what is going on relative to the Project. So, a Jan, if there is a single POC for Karen to solicit Program input from and to disseminate project information back to the Program, please designate herfhim if you have not done so already. Please be advised that this PCIC will be responsible for and will need to handle internal communications and coordination for all affected Program components in order for BFO to have a chance of meeting most ofthe scope and schedule on this Discuss? Thanks! Mathe, Chester From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBEO) Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 2:24 PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive Filling in the holes for ya. Thanks. Paul 404-639-0505 From: "99? Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 9:21 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: 'Howard, William (Bill) (coo/ocoolousp restroom/OHS) Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Paull Tell you whatwill assist where I can (and hope I don?t have to). I know you will be busy in the next few months, and with any luck the progr? particular) calm down and leave things to progress. but I would ?t bet on it. I hope you are up on your lbw-3:42 ibu?l From: Probst, Paul E. Sen 4, 2010 8:50 PM To: [Wm Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOXOHS) Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive rbit?': In general, it is my understanding that representing FMEO in the HOG does put me and Ken Walpole, as alternate. in the position of being POC's for BFO matters. For this speci?c matter, I yield to your discretion, and will assume PCB-C duties should you choose to defer. Paul From: I Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 9:39 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive I will defer to the Engineer if Paul wants to take this on. Don't know how much of a pain it is going to be. Paul, . I say ye? From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent. ., 2010 3:05 PM Subject: Rs: P2009453 - HOG Directive Should Paul be the poo? William Howard Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.2124 670514.725? (CDCIOIDINCZVED) Howard, William (Bill) Cc: Holmes, David Sent: Fri Mar 12 14:38:22 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive I can work professionally with Karen. Have a good weekend. From: Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDIOD) Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 2:32 PM Td I'b1'3t-42U5-Ge2523rn' Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanva A. Monroe, Steve Subject: Re: P2009453 HDG Directive rare: 5 the appropriate contactTo: Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Sent: Fri Mar 12 13:52:42 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 - HDG Directive George, I am happy to be the P00 for Karen on this project, but would leave the ultimate decision up to Jan. Thanks for your assistance. From: Chandler, George (CDCIDCDOIBFO) Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:48 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. (cocrocoorsFO); Williams, Jeffery (CDC/ocoorsFO); West's-C was Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve (CDCJOIDINCZVED) Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Friends: I hope there is no basic misunderstanding of BFO's support for the project and decision to move forward as requested by OHS and the HOG. Karen is trying to follow our SOP to Keep attested parties informed on the project and to solicit information that might affect scope, schedule and budget. have been informed that there are dissenting voices on this project and that some Program folks feel that their concerns have not been addressed. At the same time, I am fully aware that OHS and the Program have used a process to generate this project request, and that there can be dissenting voices as long as the dissenters legitimate concerns have been taken into account. It is not intent to intrude deeply into Program issues just to clearly communicate what is going on relative to the Project. 2 So, Ibll?} 8. Jan, if there is a single POC for Karen to solicit Program input from and to disseminate project information bact to He Program, please designate hen'him if you have not done so already. Please be advised that this POC will be responsible for and will need to handle internal communications and coordination for all affected Program components in order for BFO to have a chance of meeting most of the scope and schedule on this Discuss? Thanks! G.- From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 11:51 AM To: Chandler, George Williams, Jeffery Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Fw: P2009453 - HOG Directive on Thanks, Ken L- Bowen Sent using BlackBerrv From: To: (cociocoomHS); Howard, William (Bill) (cociocooions) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Sent: Fri Mar 12 10:56:51 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive view this as an inappropriate interaction with HOG activities and overstepping her role. This needs to be pointed out. [133.3242 Ll 2E2aih~ (CDCKOIDINCZVED) Set t: Frida March 12, 2010 9:44 AM To:, (cociocoorom); Inna: (cocrocooiorlS) Subject: FW: P2009453 HOG Directive You guys seem to have been left o?a here From: Moss, Karen (CDCKOCOOKBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 5:08 PM rods?Jam was - (coo/oiomCIno $31315th U-S-W (cociocoO/OSEP - I. I ibihau Holmes, David (cocxoco. - (CDC/cortices); - . (coerciomczveo); oamon, Inger K. (sociocoO/oSEP); Zambuto, Laura Powell, Nathaniel Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Daniels, Charles E. (coqocooisroi; Prohst, Paul E. (accreted/em) Subject: P2009453 - HOG Directive Team, BFD recently received a signed directive from the HOG on 3110:2010. As project manager I am forwardin this Hall: to you to ensure that each program memberistakeholder is aware of this recent communication. Also, 2523.5 out a separate memo as well. I believe all members of the HOG received memo but! am not abso Please see attached directive and memo and let me know if you have any questions or concerns; 31:23:? HOG MEMO Projectdoc Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: aim-8254382? Fax: aposr irective sent ive. Mathe, Chester From: (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 9:21 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHEJ Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Paul, Tell you whatwill assist where I can (and hope! don?t have to). I know you will be busy in the next few months, and with any luck the progr. particular) calm down and leave things to progress, butl wouldn?t bet on it. I hope you are Up on your 'bim' ibifb'i From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 8:50 PM Howard, William (Bill) Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive In general, it is my understanding that representing FMEO in the HOG does put me and Ken Walpole, as alternate, in the position of being for BFO matters. For this specific matter, I yield to your discretion, and will assume POC duties should you choose to defer. F?an I I Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 9:39 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: P2009453 HOG Directive I will defer to the Engineer if Paul wants to take this on. Don't know how much of a pain it is going to be- Paul. what say ye? From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Sent: Frida March 12, 2010 3:05 PM To: Subject: Re: P2009453 - HOG Directive Should Paul be the poo? William Howard Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 6?8.514.7257 From: iti,i3 1:12 U50. 2?2aih: To: (sociocooioHS); Howard, William (Bill) (cot/oboO/OHS) Cc: Holmes, David (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Sent: Fri Mar 12 14:38:22 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 HOG Directive FYI can work professionally with Karen. Have a good weekend. 'From: Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDIOD) Sent: Frida March 12, 2010 2:32 PM To: Chandler, George (CDC/ocooisFO); Bowen, Ken L. {cocrocooisson Williams, Jeffery Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Subject: Re: P2009453 - HOG Directive Tony is the appropriate contact. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device From: - To: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Sent: Fri Mar 12 13:52:42 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive George, I am happy to be the P00 for Karen on project, but would leave the ultimate decision up to Jan. Thanks for your - tance. From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:48 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. (morocco/arc); Williams, Jeffery (cocrocoo/BFO); Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Friends: I hope there is no basic misunderstanding of BFO's sopport for the project and decision to move forward as requested by OHS and the HOG. Karen is trying to follow our SOP to keep affected parties informed on the project and to solicit information that might affect scope, schedule and budget. I have been informed that there are dissenting voices on this project and that some Program folks feel that their concerns have not been addressed. At the same time, I am fully aware that OHS and the Program have used a process to generate this project request. and that there can be dissenting voices as long as the dissenter's legitimate concerns have been taken into account. It is not intent to intrude deeply into Program issues ?just to clearly communicate what is going on relative to the Project. So. if there is a single POC for Karen to solicit Program input from and to disseminate project information back to the Program, please designate herfhim if you have not done so already. Please be advised that this POO will be responsible for and will need to handle internal communications and coordination for all affected Program components in order for BFO to have a chance of meeting most of the scope and schedule on this .. Discuss? Thanks! From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCJOCOOKBFU) Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 11:51 AM To: Chandler, George Williams, Jeffery Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOWBFO) Subject: Fw: P2009453 - HOG Directive FYI. Thanks, Ken L. Bowen human--ml?lulnll Sent using BIaokBerrv From: ll:i_:i3_i 417' L130 202aih: To: (cocrocoorOHS): Howard, William (Bill) (coo/0000mm) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Fri Mar 12 10:56:51 2010 Subject: RE: p2009453 - HOG Directive view this as an inappropriate interaction with HOG activities and is overstepping her role. This needs to be pointed out. From: Sent: Frida March 12, 2010 9:44 AM To: ran-amen.team: Howard, William (Bill) (morocco/orig) Subject: FW: P2009453 - Hos Directive You guys seem to have been left offa here .. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursda March 11, 2010 5:08 PM 'b 3142 USS. - -bi-C' (coo/ororucmo ibii3.? - - (cocrocorJ/OSEP); 2520?? mils: '(cociocoorosem; Holmes, David (cocrocoororHS): Barrett, Timothy]. ll (secrete/mom - - . .. . . nge (coprocoorOSEPJ; Zambuto, Laura R. (coercioriiczveo); Powell, Nathaniel Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoorBFO) Subject: 92009453 - HOG Directive Team, BFO received a signed directive from the HOG on 31102010. As project managerl am forwardin this directive to you to ensure that each program memberr'stakeholder is aware of this recent communication. Also] ibri?r- Ima- Isent out a separate memo as well. believe all members of the HOG received memo butl am not absoluter positive. Please see attached directive and memo and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. MIME HOG Directives-ogwl?pdfass-nee Film-MEMB-Project.doc 2:32am Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS i?ttlanta1 Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-6827 Fax: 770-483-2657 email: K'Moss] @odcgov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Sunda March 14 2010 8:50 PM To: in?? ?12 U5 5- 5* 9523f?: Howard, William (Bill) Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive In general, it is my understanding that representing FMEO in the HOG does put me and Ken Walpole, as alternate, in the position of being POC's for BFO matters. For this speci?c matter, I yield to your discretion, and will assume POO duties should you choose to defer. Paul - - - Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 9:39 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive i will defer to the Engineer if wants to take this on. Don't know how much of a pain it is going to be. Paul, - at say ye? From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Fri . 12, 2010 8:05 PM To: WW U5 0 Subject: Re: P2009453 - HOG Directive Should Paul be the poo? William Howard Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 676.614.7257 From: Ib.l3l'42lJ.S To: mus:- Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocoorortS) Cc: Holmes, David (CDCXOCOOIOHS) Sent: Fri Mar 12 14:38:22 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive i can work professionally with Karen. Have a good weekend. From: Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDJOD) Se - s. u. I 2010 2:32 PM To Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. BerEch, Tanya A. Monroe, Steve (CDCIOIDINCZVED) Subject: Re: P2009453 - HOG Directive gig?6% is the appropriate contact. From: [0133-12 LL30 262.301; To: Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A: Monroe, Steve Sent: Fri Mar 12 13:52:42 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive George. I am happy to be the P00 for Karen on this project. but would leave the ultimate decision up to Jan. Thanks for your From: Chandler, George Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:48 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Subject: RE: P2009453 HOG Directive Friends: I hope there is no basic misunderstanding of BFO's support for the project and decision to move forward as requested by OHS and the HOG. Karen is trying to follow our SOP to keep affected parties informed on the project and to solicit information that might affect scope. schedule and budget. 1 have been informed that there are dissenting voices on this project and that some Program folks feel that their concerns have not been addressed. At the same time, I am fully aware that OHS and the Program have used a process to generate this project request, and that there can be dissenting voices as long as the dissenter?s legitimate concerns have been taken into account. It is not intent to intrude deeply into Program issues just to clearly communicate what is going on relative to the Project. So, ?m if there is a single POC for Karen to solicit Program input from and to disseminate project information bact to the Program, please designate herfhim if you have not done so already. Please be advised that this POC will be responsible for and Will need to handle internal communications and coordination for all affected Program components in order for BFO to have a chance of meeting most of the scope and schedule on this Discuss? Thanksl GI- From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 11:51 AM To: Chandler, George Williams, Jeffery Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Fw: P2009453 HOG Directive FYI. Thanks, Ken L. Bowen Sent using BlackBerry From; rune-42 so. a 252arh} To: [bi-i6:- Howard, Wiiliam (Bill) (cocrocoorOHS) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Fri Mar 12 10:56:51 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive I view this as an inappropriate interaction with HOG activities and Karen is overstepping her role. This needs to be pointed out. io:i3i:42 use. a 202mm 2010 9:44 AM Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive You guys seem to have been left otia here .. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursda March 11, 2010 5:08 PM - ?3303142 (coercio/chveo}; ?=42 C/ocoorosepj- Holmes, David :42 u.c. (be) 252cm) - U.S.C. I (coo/ocoorousx Howard, William (Bill) (coprocoorOHS) (3)942 lone: *nger K. 5? . {cocrococ/osea); Zambuto, Laura r-w-t ilQl? R929: "n . migw Powell, Nathaniel Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Subject: P2009453 - HOG Directive Team, BFD recently received a signed directive from the HOG on 3110i2010. As project manager I am f?mardinc communication. Also, to you to ensure that each program memberistakehclder is aware of this - out a separate memo as well. I believe all members of the HOG receive this directive Ibil?} sent memo but I am not absolutely positive. Please see attached directive and memo and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. US 25m" File: Hoe as Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road ME. ME Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: i70433?330T Cell: 404-325-002? Fax: Tim-489265? email: KMoslerijt'dcgov Projectdoc :vra Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: I m: - Sent: riday, March 12, 2010 9:39 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHEJ Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCDOJBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive I will defer to the Engineer if wants to take this on. Don?t know how much of a pain it is going to be. Paul, what say ye? From: ibii?': Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 8:05 PM - - 5- (CDCJOIDINCZVED) 3 - HOG Directive Should F'aul be the poo? William Howard Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.2124 523614125? From: szszaihi To: I was 'bl'?i Howard, William (Bill) Cc: Holmes, David Sent: Fri Mar 12 14:38:22 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive I can work professionally with Karen. Have a good weekend. From: Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDIOD) Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 2:32 PM Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Subject: Re: P2009453 - HOG Directive Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device [0331-42 USC. 202alh; To: Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Berl?sch, Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Sent: Fri Mar 12 13:52:42 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 HOG Directive George. I am happy to be the POD for Karen on this project. but would leave the ultimate decision up to Jan. Thanks for your SIS lance. From: Chandler, George (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:48 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCIOCDOIOHS) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Friends: I hope there is no basic misunderstanding of sopport for the project and decision to move forward as requested by OHS and the HOG. is trying to follow our SOP to Keep affected parties informed on the project and to solicit information that might affect scope, schedule and budget. I have been informed that there are dissenting voices on this project and that some Program folks feel that their concerns have not been addressed. At the same time, i am fully aware that OHS and the Program have used a process to generate this project request, and that there can be dissenting voices as long as the dissenter's legitimate concerns have been taken into account. It is not intent to intrude deeply into Program issues - just to clearly,r communicate what is going on relative to the Project. So, I'bilB':- Jan, if there is a single POC for Karen to solicit Program input from and to disseminate project information best to a Program, please designate herihim if you have not done so already. Please be advised that this POC will be responsible for and will need to handle internal communications and coordination for all affected Program components in order for BFO to have a chance of meeting most of the scope and schedule on this .. Discuss? Thanks! G.- From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCODIBFU) Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 11:51 AM To: Chandler, George Williams, Jeffery Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Fw: P2009453 - HOG Directive FYI. Thanks, L. Bowen Sent using BlackBerry Frum: ?2526 1i I To; I runs?- Howard, William (Bill) (CDCJOCOOIOHS) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Fri Mar 12 10:56:51 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive I view this as an inappropriate interaction with HOG activities and is overstepping her role. This needs to be pointed out. Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 9:44 AM I I (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive You guys seem to have been left offa here .. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOXBFOJ Sent: Thursda March 11,. 2010 5:08 Ta ea- Im'?r lrcocrOIomcho - Pose James E. (oyster: uses 2523??) as mes, avl Barrett1 Timothy J. (coo/comma); {3.42 I I - - nger K. tbl{3l?42 U-S-C- Zambuto, Laura .5: (cos/oromczvao); ea Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. Subject: P2009453 - HOG Directive Teami BFO recently received a signed directive from the HOG on 3nor2010. As project manager I am tomardnihc tnis directive to you to ensure that each program memberrstakeholder is aware of this recent communication. Nacho-a] aimed-sent out a separate memo as well. I believe all members ofthe HOG received memo but I am not absolutely positive. Please see attached directive and memo and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. shagging-2 EM Projectdoc Regards. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. M3 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 omee: rroeas-asor cell: assesses? Fax: mess-2:357 email: KMossl@cdc.gov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEPI From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:02 PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 HOG Directive FYI Thanks, Paul 404-539-0505 I Sent: Frida March 32, 2010 10:57 AM To: Howard, William (em) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive I view this as an inappropriate interaction with HOG activities and is overstepping her role. This needs to be 'nted out. =12 USE From: Sent: "I"l av, arc 12, 2010 9:44 AM To: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive You guys seem to have been left offa From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursda March 11, 2010 5:08 PM . To: ?334% ?30 {avalaz (cocrocoorossp - - Ihgl?j: 252st?) Holmes, David (cocrocoomst- (cot/corocsox ?it - Damon Inger K. .U-S-C- (cocxocooxosm); Zambuto, Laura R. Powell, Nathaniel (cocxoromcriocm) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. CD Williams, Jeffery Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. Subject: P2009453 - HOG Directive Team, BFO recently received a signed directive from the HOG on art 0.42010. As project manager I am forwarding this directive to you to ensure that each program memberfstakeholder is aware of this -- communication. sent out a separate memo as well. I believe all members of the HOG receive II. memo butl am not absolutely positive. Please see attached directive and memo and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Manama use 2523"? is: File: MEMO Regards. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: "rm-433.3307 Cell: 434-325-5527 Fax: 7?10-453-266? email: KMosgl @531; gm! Projectdoc Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Williams, Allison (CDCDIDINCEZID) Sent: Friday, March 12. 20101057 AM (mm?u To: Ibit3ii42U5 c.?2523tr.3- Barrett, Timothy J. - I I that . . (blot-'42 252mm (CDCIOIDINCEZID): ibll3li42 U-S-C- I ht 3 :42 U-S-C- Valle, Bessie M. Kenneth K. Watts, Clark Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOSELSIPHITP - l. - .. - (cocrocoorosap): (CDCIOIDINCIRD) RE: P2009453 HOG Directive Subject: I did not take this outside the realm of the HOG. White not a member of the HOG. OHS team lead. Dr. Holmes, expressed an interest in hearing the discussions regarding the options that were to be presented by BFO. And as this was a special meeting requested by me, extended him an invitation to hear those discussions. Perhaps, the new OHS Director, should have the opportunity to review all options before moving forward with the directive issued by the Acting Director. I understand from the OHS announcement that he has a very extensive background in the area of containment. Further, I am unclear of the schedule mentioned beiow. Both programs. and TB, have indicated they need a 3 month noti?cation regarding the start date in order to close out experiments. Both programs indicated that starting after the previously agreed July start is not an issue for them. So there is no delay of programs if this project is not started in July as described below. Also a risk assessment is needed to assess risk to staff at the soiledtgrey interface. A risk assessment is also needed to determine how contamination of animals with agents potentially blown in from the soiled corridor will be prevented. ARB has requested risk assessments from OHS and feels strongly that this project should not move forward without completing those assessments. Lastl the information you present below as he outcome of the ARBIOHS meeting is ?what was agreed upon. requested awritten document, whic km we ma: Iboth agreed they would provide. However, to date, it has not been provided. it was agreed that air reversal with a physical barrier was the way to proceed and that air reversal alone was not adequate. I encourage all members to review the BFO meeting minutes. Sincerely. aw From: Sent: rloay, ta, a?l? 9:56 AM ?Jim.? To: Barrett, Timothy J. use, .5 252a Damon, Inger K. I IbitB; ?tonal I 1' Iihti?l I 'h'il?t [3 i42 Itblt3li42 . tblt3li42 use. - (CDC/ctomczvaoii Probst Paul E. (cocrocoozsro); 252W (cocroromcassnv); (cameos/0H5); (cocromioo) (CTR 'Walole, Kenneth K. (coclocoorsso); (coqocoo/ossp); Laura R. Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive HOG members, You have been receiving Emails regarding recent decisions in the form of memos to Prohst to move forward with the Vivarium air flow redirection project. I was informed that the OHS memo was a directive from OHS, that ARB (AV) took it outside the circle of the HOG, and as a result the acting OHS director has said this will be done at a minimum. The issue of anteroomszioBubbles is a completely separate topic. At the end of last week I solicited via Email a YES or NO response (appropriate primary reps) for a proposal that was supposedly arrived at by ARE and OHS (See Below): Am FMEO has asked that the HOG and OHS provide direction regarding the Vivarium project. We were not able to agree to a soiution to the issue of anteroom instaitation at the test HOG meeting, but a separate meeting between ARE and OHS to discuss it took place. What came out of that meeting was a proposai to continue with the originat pian of reversing the air ?ow back into the animat hoiding areas and to inoiude a recommendation {from ARE and other Programs) for the instatiationfuse oi Bio-Bubbte containment barriers as an additionai ievei of protection. What i need from you is to respond either YES (for this propose!) or NO (against this proposat). it there is no objection, then a memo witt he sent out requesting FMEO to proceed aocordingty. Thanks! Note: As of yet, it has not been determined where the funding for the Bio-Bobbie devices wouid some from. Regarding the outcome of this attempt to reach consensus, I received only 2 responses hacklone of which was a from Allison and sent to ?all?. That ended the proposal, which I suppose is why others did not respond. Since it was clear that a consensus was not possible, and in the interest of improving Vivarium safety and meeting DSAT requirements, I was compelled to move forward with the original HOG decision of simple redirecting the air flow. This keeps us on schedule, should not delay the programs, and installation of anterooms can still be considered in the future. If members have issue with my actions, please feel free to communicate that in the next HOG meeting. we also need to revisit how the H06 operatesmparticularly outside involvement in this group?s deliberations and decision- making. From: m, (cociomruczveo) Sent: Frida March 12, 2010 8:45 AM To: (comets/Maven); Subject: Fw: P2009453 - HOG Directive From: Williams, AlIison Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 8:03 AM (cocrororn - - @3332?? U- - orosepi; Holmes. David (CDCIOCOOIC (cocrowocso); Ilbli3lr42 Damor. Inoer K. ?ill-3H2 ?5-05 Zambuto, Laura R. (cocroro/ncmo); (more us (cocrororNCPocxo) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 - HUG Directive . (cocroro/Ncrocro - (cocroIDrNCIRp - CIOCOOIOSEP): thyJ. This is the First ARB has seen of this directive. How can the H06 deliver a directive without discussion and the consent of all members. Does our charter empower two individual members oF the H06 to issue a directive without the knowledge and agreement of all? Following the meeting with BFO, OHS was in agreement with positively pressurized anterooms. During that meeting, the HOG was asked by the Deputy Director of BFO to discuss all options presented and come to a consensus. This has not been done. No agreement from the HOG has 3 ?0.53 been reached. A vote was solicited no less than a week ago today from in Does anyone know the result of that vote? Further, a motion was made for this discussion to continue at the next HUG. agreed it would be addressed at that time. This directive was issued without the knowledge of ARE, who has a voting voice on the HUG. Other HOG members, were you aware of this directive? Are and allowed to issue such a directive from the HOG without first discussing it wit a members at a Fully convened meeting of a quorum? I am not sure what is going on Ms. Moss. Perhaps the other members of the HOG were aware of this directive, however ARE was not and is not in Full agreement with moving Forward as outlined. Requests for a risk assessment of this and other options are still pending. Thank you for keeping all members in the loop. Sincerely, Allison Williams From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursda March 11, 2010 5:08 PM -. I -(coc;oromcroc1 dbl-3342 {bli33142 vac-s 25*? (coczocoorossp - Holmes, David (cocroorocso); m. Zambuto, Laura It? - - Powell, Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOUIBFO) Subject: P2009453 - HOG Directive Team, BFO recently received a signed directive from the HOG on snorzmo. As project managerl am forwarding this directive to you to ensure that each program memberlstakeholder is aware of this recent communication. Also, sent out a separate memo as well. I believe all members ofthe HOG received memo but I am not absolutely positive. Please see attached directive and memo and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. and? Directive <<-Fil-eM-E-MG--Projectdoc 3 Regards, Karen Moss FLE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: wees-em? Cell: 404?325e327 Fax: email: KMuss] @cdcgov Mathe, Chester From: 42 U-S-E- was (CDCIOIDINCEZIW Sent: Frida March 12 2010 10:5? AM To; limes; Howard. William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. (oocrocooraFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 HOG Directive 1 view this as an inappropriate interaction with HOG activities and is overstepping her role. This needs to be ?ninted out. Sent: Frida March 12, 2010 9:44 AM (cocxocooroHs); Howard, William (Bill) (cocxocooroHS) Subject: FW: P2009453 HOG Directive You guys seem to have been left offa here .. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Thursda March .11. 2010 5:08 PM . (cocxommceou -. I - (cocrocoo/ossp - (cocgocooyosa: ma: (cocxocooronst- we (cocfooiocsm; . (coo/ctomczv glbli3l=t2P5IG (coo/ocoorossp); Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Danieis, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOJBFO) Subject: P2009453 - HOG Directive Team, BFO recently received a signed directive from the HOG on 31022010. As project manager I am forwardin this directive to you to ensure that each program membertstakeholder is aware of this - mmunioation. Also, sent out a separate memo as well. I believe all members of the HOG received memo but I am not absolutelyr positive. Please see attached directive and memo and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. my}: 42 Engalh Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-6827 ax: email: KMossi dcmov Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: c. 262.3?th- (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 9:58 AM To: Barrett, Timothy J. Howard, William (Bill) I {misinz 2523M coercioincezio? :42 use. Probst Paul E. Valie, Bessie m. tom - Walpole, Kenneth K. you? . Ciark cocrocooroseri; Zambuto, Laura a. Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive HOG members, You have been receiving Emails regarding recent decisions in the form of memos to Probst to move forward with the Vivarium air flow redirection project. I was informed that the OHS memo was a directive from OHS, that ARB (AV) took it outside the circle of the HOG, and as a result the acting OHS director has said this will be done at a minimum. The issue of anterooms/BioBubbles is a completely separate topic. At the end of last week I solicited via Email a YES or NO response (appropriate primary reps) for a proposal that was supposedly arrived at by ARE and OHS (See Below): AH, FME has asked that the HOG and OHS provide direction regarding the Vivarium project. We were not abie to agree to a soiution to the issue of anteroom instaiiation at the test HOG meeting, but a separate meeting between ARB and OHS to discuss it took piece. What came out oi that meeting was a proposai to continue with the originai pian of reversing the air ?ew back into the animai hoisting areas and to inciude a recommendation (from ARB and other Programs) for the instaiiationx?use of Bio-Bobbie containment barriers as an additionai ievei of protection. What i need from you is to respond either YES (for this prop osai) or NO (against this proposai). it there is no objection, then a memo be sent out requesting FMEO to proceed accordingiy. Thanks! Note: As of yet, it has not been determined where the funding for the Bio-Bobbie devices wouid come from. Regarding the outcome of this attempt to reach consensus, I received only 2 responses back one of which was a from Allison and sent to ?all?. That ended the proposal, which I suppose is why others did not respond. Since it was clear that a consensus was not possible, and in the interest of improving Vivarium safety and meeting DSAT requirements, I was compelled to move forward with the original HOG decision of simple redirecting the air flow. This keeps us on schedule, should not delay the programs, and installation of anterooms can still be considered in the future. If members have issue with my actions, please feel free to communicate that in the next HOG meeting. We also need to revisit how the H06 operatesmparticularly outside involvement in this group?s deliberations and decision- making. 3142 From: .3 252a (encloIo/chveo) Sent: Frida March 12, 2010 8:45 AM To: coo/Olomczveo); Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive From: mm:- Il?l Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 8:03 3 .42 To: Moss, Karen fee was: - (coclommcmo- . . crocoolosep); ale tags. 3-1 we: "001059); Holmes, David (coclocooxoas - Barrett Timothy J. 93.3.34? m. Demo 1. Inner K. b}3i_142 US-C- Zambuto, Laura R. a aniel (CD CID) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoolero) - Subject: RE: P2009453 HOG Directive This is the first ARB has seen ot this directive. How can the HOG deliver a directive without discussion and the consent of all members. Does our charter empower two individual members of the HOG to issue a directive without the knowledge and agreement of all? Following the meeting with BFO, OHS was in agreement with positively pressurized anterooms. During that meeting, the HOG was asked by the Deputy Director of BFO to discuss all options presented and come to a consensus. This has not been done. No agreement trom the H00 has been reached. A vote was solicited no less than a week ago today from . Does anyone know the result of that vote? Further, a motion was made for this discussion to continue at the next HOG. agreed it would be addressed at that time. This directive was issued without the knowledge of ARB, who has a voting voice on the HOG. Other HOG members, were you aware of this directive? Are and allowed to issue such a directive from the HOG without first discussing it with the members at a Fully convened meeting of a quorum? I am not sure what is going on Ms. Moss. Perhaps the other members of the HOG were aware of this directive, however ARE was not and is not in full agreement with moving forward as outlined. Requests for a risk assessment of this and other options are still pending. Thank you for keeping all members in the loop. Sincerely, Allison Williams From: Moss, Karen Ser March 11, 2010 5:08 PM lb'llj?'; . we: (cocxoromceocm - (coclolomcmo Jill-"3 algal? (coczocoolosem; Holmes, David (cocroco . (by3y42. - Damon Inger K. (coclolomczveo): - - (coclocoorosem; Zambuto, Laura oqoromcmo); (coo/Olo/chveo); Powell, Nathaniel 2 Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. Subject: P2009453 - HOG Directive Team, to you to ensure that each program memberistakeholder is aware of this recent communication. Also, sent BFO recently received a signed directive from the HOG on 3i1012010. As project manager I am forwardin this directive out a separate memo as well. beiieve all members of the HOG received E52 memo butl am not absoluteiy posi'ive. Please see attached directive and memo and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. SE. 252mm ?1 File: HOG Directive 3-09-10.pdf File: MEMO Regards. Projectdoc Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Controi and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 O?ice; 7170-4133-3307 Cell: 404-325?582? Fax: email: KMossl@cdc.gov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Williams, Allison Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 8:03 AM ?3.ng To: Moss, Karen ?3)sz g?gaghv - Imus- rcnmocoomelspl; . U-S-C- - Barrett, Timothy J. (CDCIODIOADS (cooiololncezm); Damon, Inger K. (coorololNCEZlo);' Zambuto, Laura R. Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID) bi'3142 use Cc: Blanchard, Thomas Me Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive This is the First ARB has seen of this directive. How can the HOG deliver a directive without discussion and the consent oF all members. Does our charter empower two individual members oF the HOG to issue a directive without the knowledge and agreement of all? Following the meeting with BFD, 0H5 was in agreement with positively pressurized anterooms. During that meeting, the HOG was asked by the Deputy Director oF BFO to discuss all options presented and come to a consensus. This has not been done. No agreement From the H06 has been reached. A vote was solicited no less than a week ago today From Does anyone know the result oF that vote? Further, a motion was made For this discussion to continue at the next agreed it would be addressed at that time. This directive was issued without the knowledge oF ARB, w_ on the HOG. Other HDG members, were you aware oF this directive? Are allowed to issue such.a directive From the HOG without First discussing it with the members at a Fully convened meeting oF a quorum? I am not sure what is going on Ms. Moss. Perhaps the other members oF the HOG were aware oF this directive, however ARE was not and is not in Full agreement with moving Forward as outlined. Requests For a risk-assessment oF this and other options are still pending. Thank you For keeping all members in the loop. Sincerely, Allison Nilliams From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Thursda March 11, 2010.5:08 PM {misuse use. lanai?: uses (cocrocooioSEP); Holmes, David (cocioconnl Timothy J. (coo/oorocsol; lb} *Damon ibii3ii42 U-S-C- ura ibii3ii42 .nsl Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. Subject: P2009453 - HOG Directive ll BFO recently received a signed directiVe from the HOG on 311012010. As project manager I am forwardin this directive to you to ensure that each program memberlstakeholder is aware of this recent communication. Also, sent out a separate memo as well. I believe all members of the HOG received Pat?s memo but I am not absoluter positive. Please see attached directive and memo and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. :12 US 2633'?. <12: rev ?File: MEMO Projectdoc Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-552? Fax: WEI-4334567 email: KMc-ssl @dogov Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursdav. March 11, 2010 5:08 PM .b 3 .42 To: .535: [Mooney Irhva};42 Lisle. -l ll 3- - - (?(31142 ?53$ - - ibll3li42 U-S-C- 252a - a - - Barrett. Timothy J. (cocroorOAos) ibll3li42 (cocrororrvcezro); CF7ID '3 :42 0.8.0. Zambuto, Laura R. $21.42 libil3}? Powell, Nathaniel (CDCJOIDINCEZID) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 - HOG Directive - CDC 1222 KB Team, BFO recently received a signed directive from the HOG on 3(10i2010. As project manager I am forwa this directive to you to ensure that each program memberfstakeholder is aware of this recent communication. Also. sent i out a separate memo as well. i believe all members ofthe HOG received gag: emo but I am not absolutely positive. Please see attached directive and memo and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. a. - 494E Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: I?m-4300307 Cell; 404?325-682? Fax: 7?0-433-2667 email: KMossHoiodcgov Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, George Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 3:51 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium Ken you saw the previous e-mail approving the project? There are concerns about some of the scope from the mechanical I am fine with crashing this project, but gave Tom some leeway to modify the ?nal completion date based on scope. Let's discuss at next 1-on-1. From: Bowen, Keri L. (CDCIDCODIBFD) Sent: Wednesday, March 1t], 2010 12:29 PM To: Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Chandler, George Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: Vivarium i saw an email yesterday where all members were copied. George: Did you get concurrence from Jan? Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404?639-3303 Office 404?639-0499 Fax Please visit BFD Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: WiIliams, Jeffery Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:07 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Chandier, George Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Moss, Karen Subject: FW: Vivarium Paul, I would agree that time is of the essence here, but also want to make sure we have a ?rm direction that will not change drastically throughout the course of this project. The addition of anterooms (and type of construction) could potentially constitute major changesladditf?to the scope of the project. As long as all programs concur with the memo signed by OHS 8: DVRD on behalf of the Operations Group (HOG), and agree to the directive contained therein, we should proceed with this direction. Given the memo below. I am not absolutely sure all programs are in agreement-which may be a contradiction to one of the last sentences in Dr. Sanchez's signed memo. I am not sure that all members of the HOG are even aware of this signed directive. Jeff lMlliams From: Williams, Allison Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 9:35 AM To: Williams, Jeffery Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOXBFOJ Subject: FW: Vivarium Hi Mr. Williams, Since our meeting with BFO the HOG has still not reached a consensus on this project. I am not sure exactly of what is going on or what purpose the memo from OHS serves, however, OHS has only vote on the HOG. Please see email below. Hopefully, at'tne next HOG a vote will be taken and all can move forward. attached the memo from OHS in case you are unable to open it from the embedded attachment below. This was provided to all the HOG members as an FYI. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. All the best, Allison From: Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:25 PM Allison Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy J. =42 U-S- cocrotomczveo); .. er K. Howard, William (Bill) (morocco/0H5 - ., (coqotomcpoqo - (cos/ocooroseri); mm] (coerOIoruczvso);' Mgcocrotomr I - (brislz42usca - . (coo/ocoorossp) - - - - (CDCIOIDINCZVED Probst Paul E. (cocrocoorsFO); (cocrocoo/ossp); . - Bessie M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Watts, Clark (cocrocoorossp); (cocrocoo/ossp); Zambuto, Laura R. (coo/eromcmo) Cc: Black, Carolyn Powell, Nathaniel Subject: Re: Vivarium (PMS) .--.. is motion can be addressed at the next HOG meeting. Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy J. Da'non. Inner K. Howard, William .- (cocrmomcrouo); {b313l342US-C-s (cocrocooxosaa); (cocroro/chveo); libll3):42 use. a ICDCIOIDINCIRD - - - (cocrocooxossp) (brisrzazusc .(cocroromcaasn: - (cocroromczveo - Probst, Paul E. (coefocoorsFO); ?52501 'cocrocoo/OSEP); Valle Bessie M. Walpole, Kenneth Warm, Clark U. Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDJNCIRD) Cc: Black, Carolyn Powell, Nathaniel Sent: Tue Mar 09 17:05:25 2010 Subject: Re: Vivarium All: since the vote referenced in the attached document was taken over one year ago, new information has been provided regarding the scope of this work and the impact to programs. This information includes other viable options which were not originally presented to the HOG at the time of the vote. Based on this new information and possible options and no voiced safety concern with those options, I would like to make a motion for a new vote to be taken regarding the scope of this project. This vote should consider the information that is now available to us that was not available andlor made clear one year ago. The corridor will not be "clean" based air reversal alone. ?am (Bill) (coclocoolces Lthan: (coclocoollOSEP); ?39(31142 l(coc101omczveo); ll 1- - Very respectfully, Allison Williams Allison Williams, DVM From CDCIOIDINCZVED) I To: Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy J. (WW-42 Damon, 252 in Pedone, James (coclocoolossp) ?e use. (escrow/maven - Probst Paul E. (coclocoowamalhl (coo/ocoorosem; rue-L I (cocloroloo) Walpole, Kenneth K. (coclocoolseol; Watts, Clark (coclocooloserl); U-S-C- Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCKOIDINCIRD, Sent: Tue Mar 09 14:34:44 2010 Subject: FW: Vivarium LULJU. Ma FYI El From] Inns: are: (coc,lococv0HS) Sent: Tuesday:I March 09, 2010 2:21 PM To: [Wt Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDIOD Ll.s.c. Ce: Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Blac Caro yn Bowen, Ken Subject: Vivarium Please view attached memo regarding the upcoming vivarium project. Also, please send out to HOG members and High Containment Governance Council members as you see Building "tear Thanks a: us osmium-l1: Of?ce of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 42 ?E?zal 1 Please visit &meth=TAG&oroiecl=CDCOHS and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 3:39 PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive Importance: High Thanks. Paul 404-639-0505 From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:42 PM To: Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Khabbaz, Rima Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOJOHS) Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Importance: High Jan appreciate your concurrence. Ken, based on the OHS directive, with concurrence from the HOG, please proceed with the OHS Project Request. Thank you! (3. From: Nicholson, Janet Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:32 PM To: Chandler, George Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Khabbaz, Rima Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive To follow up on our convers I am in no position to overrule an expert opinion from OHS about the project to change the directional air flow in the vivarium. From my understanding, this is the best solution to the address the issue of containment in the vivarium, given the circumstances (time. money, other alternative solutions). If needed, thGovernance Council could be assembled to address the issue, but I would only do this if the issue could not be resolved in any other way. Jan Nicholson, OID From: Chandler, IGeorge (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:26 PM To: Gaunce, Jean A. Nicholson, Janet (CDCEOIDIUD) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive Haj-[3' L12 U.S.C-. Jean and Jan: Please ?nd attached a specific request from the HOG, signed @25 and bv a concerning a project request to address directional air flow in an area oproximate to jiffy: . i believe both of you are familiar with the project, which is described in some detail in the attachments, and are were or .he apparent controversy surrounding the proposed solutions directional airflow change with or without anterooms, in the simplest terms). I am e-mailing you for your concurrence or non-concurrence with the proposal in Directive not that i am questioning the wisdom of the HOG at all: it's simply that if there are major concerns that some views on this have not been heard I do not want to get a major change order in the middle of the Project. or to have the issue inadvertently escalate to the 12?? floor without making sure that opposing views have been properly evaluated by the full HOG. or in accordance with the HOG's approval charter. I understand that a speedy resolution of this issue is quite important~ I just wantto make sure that there is consensus on this or at least informed consent from the appropriate governance structure. Thanks! (3.- Below (pdf file) is the scanned copy of the directive signed by @3'3 andl?ul, members were recipients of this directive. HOG members did receive a memo from for design and construction of this project. i have attached it below. Thanks, Jeff to: File: MEMO Building - Projectdoc File: HOG Directive 3-09-10.pdf All: Please see attached letter as requested by Chandler from HOG Manager in install scope as described. Please note window of duration {July 3-24) that is being planned for shutdown of Vivarium to accommodate the construction effort. Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from 0D, ?nalization of scope, market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG committee of current status. Thanks, Paul Probst. PE Asst. Dir., Operations BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:42 PM To: Nicholson, Janet Gaunce. Jean A. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Khabbaz, Rima Howard, William (Bill) Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Importance: High Jan I appreciate your concurrence. Ken, based on the OHS directive, with concurrence from the HOG, please proceed with the OHS Project Request. Thank youl From: Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDJOD) Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:32 PM To: Chandler, George Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCIOCOOJDHS) Cc: Williams, Jefferyr Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Khabbaz, Rima Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive To follow up on our converse I am in no position to overrule an expert opinion from OHS about the project to change the directional airflow in the vivarium. From my Understanding, this is the best solution to the address the issue of containment in the vivarium, given the circumstances (time, money, other alternative solutions}. overnance Council could be assembled to address the issue, but would only do this if the issue could not be resolved in any other way. Jan Nicholson, OID From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:26 PM To: Gaunce, Jean A. Nicholson, Janet Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E, Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Subject: PW: P2009453 - HOG Directive Jean and Jan: Please ?nd attached a speci?c request from the HOG. Sig, "Dietiw-S-Ei?f?fa nd 9? concerning a project request to address directional airflow in an area of proximate to i believe both of you are familiar with the project, which is described in some detail in the attachments, and are aware of the apparent controversy surrounding the proposed solutions directional air?ow change with or without anterooms, in the simplest terms). larn e-mailing you for your concurrence or non~concurrence with the proposal in I I irective not that I am questioning the wisdom of the HOG at all: it's simply that iflhere are major concerns that some views on this have not 1 been heard I do not want to get a major change order in the middle of the Project, or to have the issue inadvertently escalate to the 12?" fioor without making sure that opposing views have been properly evaluated by the full HOG, or in accordance with the HOG's approval charter. I understand that a speedy resolution of this issue is quite important- ljust want to make sure that there is consensus on this or at least informed consent from the appropriate governance structure. Thanks! Below (Pdf ?le) is the scanned copy of the directive signed by ?523"? I I'm not sure if HOG members were recipients of this directive. HOG members did receive a memo from later regarding the basis for design and construction of this project. I have attached it beiow. Thanks, . Jeff File: MEMO Building Project.ch File: HOG Directive 3?09?1U.pdf All: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandler from HOG Manager 1 BFO with directive to install scope as described. Please note window of duration (July 3?24) that is being planned for shutdown of Vivarium to accommodate the construction effort. Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from OD, ?nalization of scope, market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG 0f current SIRIUS. Thanks. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir., Operations BFOiFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Mathe, Chester (cocrocooroseg) From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:34 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive Got be full steam aheadl. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-639-3303 Of?ce 404639?0490 Fax Please visit BFO ggustomer Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFD. - This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Nicholson, Janet Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:32 PM To: Chandler, George Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. (CDCXOCOOIBFO): Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCJOCOOJBFO): Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Khabbaz, Rima Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive To follow up on our convers - I am in no position to overrule an eXpert opinion from OHS about the project to change the directional air flow in the vivarium. From my understanding. this is the best solution to the address the issue of containment in the vivarium, given the circumstances (time, money, other alternative solutions). If needed, the Governance Council could be assembled to address the issue, but I would only do this if the issue could not be resolved in any other way. Jan Nicholson, PILD. OID From: Chandler, George (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:26 PM To: Gaunce, Jan A. Nicholson, Janet Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive rtlliEii-?lE 2523 Jean and Jan: Please ?nd attached a speci?c request from the HOG, si b, m- lei? . .- 4w? 5 concerning a project request to address directional airflow in an area of roximate 'eiieve both?e?ayod are familiar with the project, which is described in some detail in the attac ments, and are aware of the apparent controversy surrounding the proposed solutions directional airflow change with or without anterooms, in the simplest terms). l?t- I am e-mailing you for your concurrence or non-concurrence with the proposal in . I irective not that I am questioning the wisdom of the HOG at all: it's simply that if there are major concerns that some views on this have not been heard I do not want to get a major change order in the middle of the Project, or to have the issue inadvertently escalate to the ?12th floor without making sure that opposing views have been properly evaluated by the full HOG, or in accordance with the HOG's approval charter. I understand that a speedy resolution of this issue is quite important just want to make sure that there is consensus on this or at least informed consent from the appropriate governance structure. Thanks! G.- Below (pdf ?le] is the scanned copy of the directive signed wit?? UE-C- 252mm members were recipients of this directive. HOG members did receive a memo?r?rom for design and construction of this project. I have attached it below. I'm not sure if HOG . . later regarding the bags ThanksI Jeff File: MEMO Buildin Projectdoc so? 5 ?52 File: HOG Directive an- All: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandler from HOG Manager to BFO with directive to install scope as described. Please note window of duration (July 3-24) that is being planned tor shutdown of Vivarium to accommodate the construction effort. Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from OD. ?nalization of scope, market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG committee of current status. Thanks. Paul Probst. PE Asst Dir., Operations BFOfFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDIOD) Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:32 PM To: Chandler, George Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen. Ken L. Blanchard. Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George (cocrocomsFoi; Khabbaz, Rima Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive To follow Up on our convers' I am in no position to overrule an expert opinion from OHS about the project to change the directional air flow in the 4 vivarium. From my understanding, this is the best solution to the address the issue of containment in the-Vivarium, give 1 the circumstances (time, money, other alternative solutions). If needed, the Governance Council could be assembled to address the issue, but I would only do this if the issue could not be resolved in any other way. Jan Nicholson, From: Chandler, George Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:26 PM To: Gaunce, Jean A. Nicholson, Janet Cc: WilIiams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive Jean and .Jan: Please ?nd attached a specific request from the HOG, sisnuec b\l librIP'xrdEUE-C 5252mm I this: concerning a project request to address directional air flow in an area of leg; proximate tolfbil3ii42 believe both of you are familiar with the project, which is described in some detail in the attacnm -nts, and are is apparent controversy surrounding the proposed solutions directional air?ow change with or without anterooms, in the simplest terms). I am e-mailing you for your concurrence or non~concurrence with the proposal in 2525 Directive not that I am questioning the wisdom of the HOG at all: it's simply that if there are major concerns that some views on this have not been heard i do not want to get a major change order in the middle of the Project, or to have the issue inadvertently escalate to the 12"" ?oor without making sure that opposing views have been properly evaluated by the full HOG, or in accordance with the HOG's approval charter. I understand that a speedy resolution of this issue is quite important- i just want to make sure that there is consensus on this or at least informed consent from the appropriate governance structure. Thanks! GI- Below (pdf file) is the scanned copy of the directive signed [b19142Hit-?ier?? I. members were recipients of this directive. HOG members did receive a memo from for design and construction of this project I have attached it below. 1 Thanks. JEff tune-:42 us c. 252mm cs File: MEMO Projectdoc File: HOG Directive 3-09-10.pdf All: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandler from HOG Manageto BFO with directive to install scope as described. Please note window of duration (July' 3-24) that is being planned for shutdown of Vivarium to accommodate the construction effort. Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from OD. ?nalization of scope, market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG committee of current status. Thanks, Paul Probst, PE Asst. Din, Operations BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404?639?0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Mathe, Chester (cocrocoorosem From: Moss, Karen Sent: 1 10.20105201 PM To: . .- . (CDCIOIDINCIRD - Mil? we I - - Blanchard Thomas M. (CDCIOCDOIBFO - l; Damon, lnger K. I Zambuto, Laura R. - Wal ole fienneth K. Probst, Paul E. Howard, William (Bill) Williams, Jeffery Powell. Nathaniel Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Keilar. - Subject: P2009453 ear i . HVAC Mod. - Meeting Minutes 2123:2010 - lxos CDC 2451 KB All, Attached are the meeting minutes from our 2i23i2010 meeting on the above referenced project. Please advised me if you have an? additions or corrections to make. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cers Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 434-325-632? Fax: email: KMossl cdc. ov Maths, Chester From: Chandler, George Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:48 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium From Jean, not Jan who is on the road - aspect concurrence as soon as she can use Bberry. From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 12:29 PM To: Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Chandler, George Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium I saw an email yesterday where all members were copied. George: Did you get concurrence from Jan? Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404?639-3303 Office 404-639-0499 Fax Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:07 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Chandler, George Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Moss, Karen Subject: FW: Vivarium Paul, I would agree that time is of the essence here, but also want to make sure we have a ?rm direction that will not change drasticaliy throughout the course of this project. The addition of anteroorns {and type of construction) could potentially constitute major changesiadd' to the scope of the project. As long as all programs concur with the memo signed by OHS 3. DVRD on behalf of Operations GroUp (HOG), and agree to the directive contained therein, we should proceed with this direction. Given the memo below, I am not absolutely sure all programs are in agreement which may be a contradiction to one of the last sentences in Dr. Sanchez?s signed memo. I am not sure that all members of the HOG are even aware of this signed directive. Jeff Williams From: Williams, Allison Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 9:35 AM To: Williams, Jeffery (CD Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODIBFD) Subject: FW: Vivarium Hi Mr. Williams, Since our meeting with BFO the HOG has still not reached a consensus on this project. i am not sure exactly of what is going on or what purpose the memo from OHS serves. however, OHS has only vote on the HOG. Please see email below. Hopefully, at the next HOG a vote will be taken and all can move forward. I attached the memo from OHS in case you are unable to open it from the embedded attachment below. This was provided to all the HOG members as an FYI. Please let me know it you have any questions or concerns. All the best, Allison From: bll3}242 5.0. Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:25 PM To: Williams Allison Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy]. (slim-?42 Damon In er K. Howard, William (Bill) 50- 2 {bil31242 LLB-Cs (socioecoxossii); 'ibitsiz42 'Ro ert Pedone, James IDfo? vsoi: - Massun - lbii3iz42 uses (coczoio/chvso); Probst Paul E. (cociocooraso); 3? (cocrocoorossp); Valle Bessie M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Watts, Clark {coczocooxosspy (coo/ocoorossp); Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDJNCIRD) Cc: Black, Carolyn Powell, Nathaniel Subject: Re: Vivarium ins motion can be addressed at the next HOG meeting. Fro Williams Allis To: 'bi'B-i Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy J. us. Damon Iner K. Howard, William (Bill) (CDCXOCOOIOHS): (coerciom nl - - mi lbi - (coolers/NC: - bert (escrow/mommy Pedon {Satire ocoorossp) (bll3ii42 uses (coo/ciomcl-ll-lsrp l:2u.s. 2 (coo/ocooisroy 252d?? ocrocooxossp); (cocxoro/chvso - Probst Paul E. (cocrocooioHS); Valle, Bessie M. coo/oIo/oo) Walpole, Kenneth K. (cociocooisroy Watts, Clark (cocrocoorossp); (coo/ocooiosspi; Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Black, Carolyn ((311)001thl Powell, Nathaniel Sent: Tue Mar 09 17:05:25 2010 Subject: Re: Vivarium All: since the vote referenced in the attached document was taken over one year ago, new information has been provided regarding the scope of this work and the impact to programs. This information includes other viable options which were not originally presented to the HOG at the time of the vote. Based on this new information and possible options and no voiced safety concern with those options, I would like to make a motion for a new vote to be taken regarding the scope of thisiproject. This vote should consider the information that is now available to us that was not available andior made clear one year ago. The corridor will not be "clean" based air reversal alone. Very respectfully, Allison Williams Allison Williams. DVM (cocrom/NCZVED) To: Monro Barrett, Timothy J. i In er K. dovvard. William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS - . ibiisir42 [(cocrocoorossp); (bli3li4? U-S- (cociorozucmg?? Ulc'c Massun Robert 252a,,? - Probst Paul E. {coo/ocooxsFo (coo/ocoorosspj; Val e. Bessie v. (CDCIOIDJOD) Walpole, Kenneth K. Watts, Clark lbli3l}42 U- Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. Sent: Tue Mar 09 14:34:44 2010 Subject: FW: Vivarium (cocrommc - - From: lbw:- Sent: Tuesda March 09, 2010 2:21 PM To lbil?: Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDIOD . cc. . Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Black, Carolyn Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Vivarium Please view attached memo regarding the upcoming vivarium project. Also, piease send out to HOG members and High Containment Governance Council members as you see fit. Building Projectcloc? Thanks I I [olisi I Of?ce of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention lli'n'sizva us @2526'?? Please visit and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey. Maths, Chester From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:38 PM To: Gaunce, Jean A. Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDIOD) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO Blanchard, Thomas M. F?robst, Paul E- (CDCIOCOOKBFO): Raymond, (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Thank you, Jean! From: Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCIOCODIOHS) Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:38 PM To: Chandler, George Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDIOD) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOZBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 - HOG Directive I am aware of the proposed actons and concur with the recommendations put forth "Jim-?49 Jean Gaunce CDR, USPHS Of?ce of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Cli?on Rd (F-05) Atlanta, GA. 30333 404-639-4614 From: Chandler, George To: Gaunce, Jean A. Nicholson, Janet Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Sent: Wed Mar 10 15:25:53 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive Jean and Jan: Please find attached a speci?c request from the HOG. sined mutt concerning a project request to address directional air ?ow in an area 0 proximate tollbiiai?42 i believe both of you are familiar with the project, which is described in some detail in the attec ments, and are 1e apparent controversy surrounding the proposed solutions directional airflow change with or without anterooms, in the simplest terms). 53 ?2623 i am e-mailing you for your concurrence or non-concurrence with the proposal in .m Directive not that I am questioning the wisdom of the HOG at all: it's simply that if there are major concerns that some iews on this have not been heard I do not want to get a major change order in the middle of the Project, or to have the issue inadvertently escalate to the 12'? ?oor without making sure that opposing views have been properly evaluated by the full HOG, or in accordance with the HOG's approval charter. I understand that a speedy resolution of this issue is quite important I just want to make sure that there is consensus on this or at least informed consent from the appropriate governance structure. Thanks! Below (pdf ?le} is the scanned copy of the directive signed by ?3 52mm I'm not sure if HOG members were recipients of this directive. HOG members did receive a memo fron?lis?l later regarding the basis for design and construction of this project. I have attached it below. Thanks, Imus: us . essam; - Directive All: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandler from HOG Manager [nib-is? I I BFO with directive to install scope as described. Please note window of duration (July' 3-24) that is being planned for shutdown of Vivarium to accommodate the construction effort. Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from OD. ?nalization of scope. market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG committee of current status. Thanks, F'aul Probst. PE Asst. Dir., Operations ElFOfFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Office 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-235-2580 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Gaunce, Jean A. (CDOIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:38 PM To: Chandler, George Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDIOD) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond. George Subject: Re: P2009453 - HOG Directive I am aware of the proposed actons and concur with the recommendations put forth by I wit-142USE-?ee?? Jean Gaunce CDR, USPHS Of?ce of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd Atlanta, GA. 30333 404-639-4814 From: Chandler, George To: Gaunce, Jean A. Nicholson, Janet (CDCJOIDIOD) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Sent: Wed Mar 10 15:25:53 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive Jean and Jan: Please ?nd attached a speci?c request from the HOG, si - - II we concerning a project request to address directional air flow in an area of proximate to Willa)?i2 I I believe both of you are familiar with the project, which is described in some detail in the attachments, and are aware of the apparent controversy surrounding the proposed solutions directional airflow change with or without anterooms, in the simplest terms). i am e-mailing you for your concurrence or non-concurrence with the proposal in - - . . i Directive not that I am questioning the wisdom of the HOG at all: it's simply that if there are major concerns that some views on this have not been heard I do not want to get a major change order in the middle of the Project, or to have the issue inadvertently escalate to the 12?" ?oor without making sure that opposing views have been properly evaluated by the full HOG, or in accordance with the HOG's approval charter. i understand that a speedy resolution of this issue is quite important -- just want to make sure that there is consensus on this or at least informed consent from the appropriate governance structure. Thanks! G.- use. 252mm I [35.42 l'm notsure later regarding the basis Below (pdf ?le) is the scanned copy of the directive signed byi members were recipients of this directive. HOG members did receive a memo from for design and construction of this project. have attached it below. Thanks, Jeff . Projectdocee Directive All: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandler from HOG Manager' to BFO with directive to i install scope as described. Please note window of duration (July 3-24) that is being'p'lan'n'ed'm'r'shutdown of Vivarium to accommodate the construction effort. Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from OD, ?nalization of scope. market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG committee of current status. Thanks, Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir.. Operations BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404285-2550 Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEF) From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Probst. Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Wednesday. March 10. 2010 3:27 PM Williams. Jeffery Bowen. Ken L. Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) RE: Vivarium FW: Vivarium This is the e-mail with attachment that went out to all HOG members yesterday. It is not the same as the HOG Directive, but explains the background of the situation and leans on the March 2009 consensus to move forward with the project. I am not aware of the signed directive being distributed to all HOG members. Thanks. Paul 404-639-0505 From: Williams. Jeffery Sent: Wednesday. March 10. 2010 3:14 PM To: Bowen. Ken L. Probst. Paul E. Chandler. George (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium I Linn [01611-12 USE: ?252a rn. of the loo - Thanks Jeff Was the signed directi a little on this. but the only email I received whereby everyon regarding the basis for design and construction for the Buildin ve sent out to a wide distribution as well? was cooie rods 45 5 C: 262301 was the memo from From: Bowen. Ken L. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Sent: Wednesday. March 10. 2010 12:29 PM To: Williams. Jeffery Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFO): Chandler. George Cc: Bowen. Ken L. Subject: RE: Vivarium I saw an emaii'vesterday where all members were copied. George: Did you get concurrence from Jan? Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-639-3303 Office 404-639-0499 Fax Please visit BFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. . This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. CDC Federal and contracted employees are invited to participate in our survey. From: Williams, Jefi?erjrr Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:07 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Chandler, George (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium Paul, I would agree that time is of the essence here, but also want to make sure we have a firm direction that will not change drastically throughout the course of this project. The addition of anterooms (and type of construction) could potentially constitute major changesfadd- to the scope of the project- As long as all programs concur with the memo signed by OHS DVRD on behalf of '5?442 Operations Group (HOG), and agree to the directive contained therein, we should proceed with this direction. Given the memo below I am not absolutely sure all programs are in agreement which may be a contradiction to one of the last sentencesi igned memo. I am not sure that all members of the HOG are even aware of this signed directive. Jeff Williams From: Williams, Allison Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 9:35 AM To: Williams, Jeffery Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Moss, Karen Subject: FW: Vivarium Hi Mr. Williams, Since our meeting with BFO the HOG has still not reached a consensus on this project. lam not sure exactly of what is going on or what purpose the memo from OHS serves, however, OHS has only vote on the HOG. Please see email below. Hopefully, at the next HOG a vote will be taken and all can move fonvard. I attached the memo from OHS in case you are unable to open it from the embedded attachment below. This was provided to all the HOG members as an FYI. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. All the best, Allison Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 5:25 PM To: Willims Allison (Cecioromeocro); Monroe, Steve (CDCioiorucszo); Barrett, Timothy J. {cocroorocscm (WW CDC/otoiuczveo); Da n. . Howard William (Bill) - - . (CDCrocooxossrl; - - Pedone, James (cociocooiosspy - ames E. - - Probst Paul E. cocrocooxossp); (cociocooxonsy . - Walpole, Kenneth K. Ware, Clark (cocrocooiossp) (cocxocoorossp); Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Black, Carolyn Powell, Nathaniel (coordiomCPoCIo) Subject: Re: 1vivarium is motion can be addressed at the next HOG meeting. From: Williams, Allison To Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy]. Damon, Inger K. Howard, William (Bill) 2 . ?mi (cociciiom - .le (cociommr sot: (cociomm -. Pedone, James U-S-C- ?5-05 Probs Paul E. (cociocoorsFO); ?ml-?l sociocooiosepm use; . - We pole, Kenneth K. Watts, Clark (cociocoorosap); (cocrocooiosap); Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: Black, Carolyn Powell, Nathaniel Sent: Tue Mar 09 1?:05:25 2010 Subject: Re: Vivarium All: since the vote referenced in the attached document was taken over one year ago. new information has been provided regarding the scope of this work and the impact to programs. This information includes other viable options which were not originally presented to the HOG at the time of the vote. Based on this new information and possible options and no voiced safety concern with those options, I would like_to make a motion for a new vote to be taken regarding the scope of this project. This vote should consider the information that is now available to us that was not available andlor made clear one year ago. The corridor will not be "clean" based air reversal alone- Very respectfully, Allison Williams Allison Williams, DVM From: To: Monroe, Steve Barrett, Timothy J. (CDCIODIOCSO Iner K. Howard William (Bill) (CDCIOCODI (coqocoorosem; {bil3i34 - (cocioiomcr Pedone, James - . - Probst Paul E. (coo/ocoorsro) (cociocooiosem; Val Bessie M. (CDCIOIDIOD) Walpole, Kenneth K. Watts, Clark (bil3i342 U-S-C- ?2 (cocrocoorosem; Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. (cocioiomcmo) Sent: Tue Mar 09 14:34:44 2010 Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI From: Ser Marr- 09? 2010 2:21 PM To: Nicholson, Janet Cc: Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Black, Carolyn Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Vivarium Please view attached memo regarding the upcoming vivarium project. Also, please send out to HOG members and High Containment Governance Council members as you see Building use. s252 Thanks Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 2:35 PM To: lvlenree. Steve Barrett, Timothy .J. (cocroorolsosl; Damon, lner cocromrncezro); DIEM szsu (CDCIOIDINCEZIDJ: (cocmlomcmo); "5 . -- rocoorosem; . - Dsul (cocrocoollsFoi; cocrocoorosesl; . Valle, Bessie M. Kenneth K. Watts, Clark (oocrocoorDSEP); (W3): Williams, Allison amu o, aura . Subject: FW: Vivarium F?t?l IEI From: (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Sert: Tuesdav. Marr'l? 09, 2010 2:21 PM To: Nicholson, Janet (CDCKOIDJOD Cc: Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David U-S-C- . Howard, William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Black, Carolyn Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Vivarium Please view attached memo regarding the upcoming vivarium project. Also, please send out to HOG members and High Containment Governance Council members as you see buildi Thanks I I lens: Of?ce of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Please visit and tell us about your recent experiences with OHS. This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey. a? DEPARTMENT or HEALTH HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) O?iee of Health and Safety Atlanta GA 30333 Date: March 9, 2010 From: Of?ce of Health and Safety Re: Vivarium air reversal project tors} 42 so gasserm The basis of design and construction for the Vivarium was to provide a clean access corridor around the facility and a U-S-C. 2628 down the middle. 'mi' 42 U5 '2 i Personnel. entering. into the containment ace would follow the path of clean corridor, [lla' into an anteroom, to the procedure room, into the USC, ,252 room, and out into a common Personnel then would exit the ace via a shower out facility. Directional air?ow follows the path from clean corridor into the Prior to Vivarium occupancy, OHS observed ?eld conditions, identi?ed corrective changes and communicated these corrective changes that needed to be made to the operational parameters of the facility. The one specific issue centered on the need to reverse the air direction in the > Thanks inns. HIMSE- Of?ce of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ll Piease visit s:ffsro.bearin oint.comWebServioefmnveb andtell us about your recent experiences with OHS. This survey is for internal CDC use only end the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey. F?wmf?v I IJS C: 262mb: [bind-.42 USE: 262mb: - DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Of?ce of Health and Safety Atlanta GA 30333 Date: March 9, 2010 From: Of?ce of Health and Safety Re: Vivarium air reversal project [ojt'3t42 fl" . mummtwag The basis of design and construction for thel - -C- i 2 23 down the middle. provide a clean access corridor around the facility and alarm-'42 . LP. ersonnel. entering into --th-econtainment ace would follow the path of clean corridor, into an anteroom, to the procedure room, into the 2 room, and out into a common Personnel then would exit the space via a shower out facility. Directional air?ow follows the path'frorn clean corridor into the (bit3tr42 Prior to Vivarium occupancy, OHS Jserve 1e conditions, identi?ed corrective changes and communicated these corrective changes that needed to be made to the operational parameters of the facility. The one speci?c issue centered on the need to reverse the air direction in the ?3:93:42 to flow from the corridor into the rooms. This is the BMBL facilities, where infected animals are isolated from adjacent spaces. Additionally, problems with having multiple programs in the vivarium, work flow and immunization requirements supported the need for the change. The utilization of negative rooms is an industry standard 81 ?north both the BMBL and a thirty: year success rate on CDC carnpus?s currently operating "space -- There may be additional proposals or options that programs may wish to move forward with under different project proposals. These options include the use of Biobubbles as provisional structured anterooms or more permanent bricks and mortar anterooms. OHS is acceptable to either. of these options dependent on design. This dependency on design will primarily be baSed on feasibility of ihe design and also that the vivarium itself remains the secondary means of containment. Programs or the HOG will be responsible for re-writing current practices and protocols to accommodate the air reversal change. totocols will also need to be reviewed and approved by the Of?ce of Health and Safety Biosafety Manager or a request for assistance in writing these new protocols may be made. The voting members of the Buildingl mitt? lOcerations Group, which is chartered oversight and operations of all spaces in thel D, larea of Building all agreed to go forward with the project in March 2009. There is a tight window of opportunity when the Vivarium occupant operations can be shut down to accommodate the project schedule. These changes are requested to ensure the continued safety and health of the viviarium occupants and surrounding facility occupants. tens-:42 Ll SC. .. . lone; I '3 742 US Allthebest, . .r I Allison Jr-.- From "33?5" CZVED) Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:25 PM . .. .Ll? . - . To: Williams Allison Barrett; Tlmothy J. CDC/otoiliczveo); Howard William (Bill) (coclocooio - - 3- .(coC/ocoo OSEP - (socioloinczveo); 'lbilal: lioocxomin - Pedone; James -- (cociocooiossp);iblislz42 J-S-C- - (cociocooisro); 252a?) [endows/0559); . Wal ole Kenneth K. (cociocooioseri); am e, aura I Cc: Black, Carolyn Nathaniel Subject: Re: Vivarium is motion can be addressed at the next HOG meeting. [El I (cocfominczveo); Barrettm othv-J. Dal Howard; William [Diet . {bli3ii429?-E .(coolocooi?oseri; (Mia-'42 (CDCfOIDfNibil3li42 ib=i3i142U-3-C- (cooroiom - (cociocooxosemw?aihl - Paul (cociocoojlsrol; ass, . (cociocooioHS); Vale Bessie M. sociomioo)? Walpole, Kenneth K. (coqocoo BFO (cociocooiosem; (coo/ocooiosem; Zambuto, Laura R. Cc: slack; Carolyn {cociommcnocroh Powell; Nathaniel (cocioroincraoao) Sent: Tue Mar 09 1?:05:25 2010 Subject: Re: Vivarium r-?n All: since the vote referenced in the attached document was taken over One year ago. new information has'_been provided regarding tIhIe?IIscIopeof this work and the impact to programs. This information includes other viable options whicI'ILwere I not originally presented ?to' the HOG at the time of'the vote-IBasedIo'n this new information and possible options and no" voiced safety concern with those options; I would like'to Imake a'Imotion for a new vote'Ito be taken regarding the scope of i this project. This vote eho'uld consider the information that is now available to us that was not available andl'orI made Idleaf oneyearago. The corridor will not be "clean" based air reversal alone. Very respectfully. - - i . Allison Williams - . - . .I I- I Allison Williams, - - .I . From I I To mils:- (coci J. '(cocxooiocso (coo/oiomczveo Damon; use. In er K. Howard 'William it'll-6: libli3li42 . (coo/ocooioSEP); ., Massung; Robert Pedone, James libli3}:42 use. - Priestle Rachael (coo/OIo/chveo - Probst Paul E. (Coo/ocooiseol282a'h' (coo/ocooiosspl; (coo/ocooionsy Valle; Bessie M. ?li?lialpole,r Kenneth K. Watts, Clark I 1. a -. 2 I Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDINCIRD) ,4 Sent: Tue Mar 09 14:34:44 2010 Subject: Fw: Vivarium FYI From: Ser t: Tuesda March 09, 2010 2:21 PM Nicholson, Janet (cocxoxo/oo) Cc: Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes. David . (CDCIOCOOIOSEP): Hawai'd. William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Black, Carolyn Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Vivarium Please view attached memo regarding the upcoming vivarium project. Also, please send out to HOG members and High Containment Governance Council members as you see fit. (HHS, :12 US :6:th Projectdocaa Thanks mire. Office of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention nuns, Please visit and tell us about your recent experiences with This survey is for internal CDC use only and the results will be used to improve business services. Anyone working for CDC in any capacity is invited to participate in our survey. Maths, Chester From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 3?1, 2010 2:26 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery CampbellI John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Keller, (Kathi) We ole Kenneth K. Illiam (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE): so m: Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. Subject: RE: P2009453 :f?j-E HVAC Modifications - IXOS CDC 54'? KB Ladies and Gentlemen, I made a few more revision to clarify based on meeting discussions. Regards. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: it?ll?400530? Cell: 404625?632? Fax; email: From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:52 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn KeIIar, Kath Kathi Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) (CDCKOCOOIOHS): me Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOXBFOJ Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Subject: P2009453 553 anc Modi?cations Ladies and Gentlemen, Attached are the minutes of our 3_22_2010 meeting. Please advise should you have additions or corrections. Attached is the OHS air?ow diagram that I have revised to show the new wail location. Also, I have modi?ed the existing directional air flow for the demmfed on existing drawings and the baseline test and balance that was done. The decon area is neutral to the ?3353142 OHS to direct it this is to be maintain as neutral or changed as positive to the autoclave area as the future air?ow arrows now indicate. 1 Best Regards. File: vivarium air File: P2009453 3_22_2010.pdf Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta. Georgia 30333 t'lifice E'Tii 404 kin-6 ?3827 text 4 ?x 2?38? email ?lgmlig?tdcegt BI :43 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:38 PM To: Gaunce, Jean A. Nicholson, Janet Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard. Thomas M. Probst. Paul E. Raymond, George Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Thank you, Jeani G, From: Gaunce, Jean A. Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:38 PM To: Chandler, George Nicholson, Janet Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Subject: Re: P2009453 - HOG Directive I am aware of the proposed actons and concur with the recommendations put forth @252? Jean Gaunce CDR, USPHS Of?ce of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd Atlanta, GA. 30333 404-639-4514 From: Chandler, George To: Gaunce, Jean A. Nicholson, Janet Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst. Paul E. Raymond, George Sent: Wed Mar 10 15:25:53 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive Jean and Jan: Please ?nd attached a speci?c request from the HOG, sined bi Wish" I concerning a project request to address directional air flow in an area 0 proxrmate to I believe both of you are familiar With the project, which is described in some detail in the attac ments, and are aware of the apparent controversy surrounding the proposed solutions directional air?ow change with or without anterooms, in the simplest terms). 42 LIE II: 52523 i am e-rnailing you for your concurrence or non-concurrence with the proposal in Directive not that i am questioning the wisdom of the HOG at all: it?s simply that if there are major concerns that some views on this have not been heard I do not want to get a major change order in the middle of the Project, or to have the issue inadvertently escalate to the 12th floor without making sure that opposing views have been properly evaluated by the full HOG, or in accordance with the HOG's approval charter. I understand that a speedy resolution of this issue is quite important i just want to make sure that there is consensus on this or at least informed consent from the appropriate governance structure. Thanksl G.- Below (pdf ?le) is the scanned copy of the directive signed II [bent-i I I'm not sure if HOG members were recipients of this directive. HOG members did receive a memo from so: Ibis: later regarding the basis for design and construction of this project. I have attached it below. Thanks, mire-.42 us 262mm -- Projectcioc>> Directive All: Ih: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandler from HOG Manager to BFO with directive to install scope as described. Please note window of duration (July 3-24] that is being planned for shutdown of Vivarium to accommodate the construction effort. Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from OD. ?nalization of scope. market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG committee of current status. Thanks, Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir. Operations BFOJ'Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office 404-539-0505 Cell: 404?285?2560 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: {cocrccoorosna Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:38 PM To: Chandler, George Nicholson, Janet (CDCJOIDIOD) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 - HOG Directive I am aware of the proposed and concur with the recommendations put forth by Dr. Sanchez and Jean Gaunce CDR, USPHS Of?ce of Health and Safety Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1500 Clifton Rd Atlanta, GA. 30333 404-639-4614 From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOBFO) To: Gaunce, Jean A. Nicholson, Janet Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wed Mar 10 15:25:53 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive Jean and Jan: Please ?nd attached a speci?c request from the HOG, singer by! 2523i? concerning a project request to address directional air flow in an area of proximate til-?it?l-?l? . I believe both of you are familiar with the project. which is described in some detail in the attachments, and are :he apparent controversy surrounding the proposed solutions directional air?ow change with or without anterooms. in the simplest terms). I am e-mailing you for your concurrence or non-concurrence with the proposal inirective - not'that I am questioning the wisdom of the HOG at all: it?s simply that it there are major concerns that some views onithis have not been heard I do not want to get a major change order in the middle of the Project, or to have the issue inadvertently escalate to the 12'? ?oor without making sure that opposing views have been properly evaluated by the full HOG, or in accordance with the HOG's approval charter. i understand that a speedy resolution of this issue is quite important - just want to make sure that there is consensus on this or at least informed consent from the appropriate governance structure. Thanks! BEIOW (Pill ?le) is the scanned copy of the directive signed E: 52mm: I'm not sure if HOG members were recipients of this directive. HOG members did receive a memo from later regarding the basis for design and construction of this project. have attached it below. Thanks, Jeff US [1.3 262mb! Projectdoc>> Directive 3-09-?ll1pdfee All: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandler from HOG Managed ?Mi-?9 5 9523"?? Iwith directive to install scope as described. Please note window of duration (July 3-24) that is being planned for shutdown of Vivarium to accommodate the construction effort. Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from OD, ?nalization ofscope. market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG committee of current status. Thanks, Paul Probst, PE Asst. Din, Operations BFOiFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Maths, Chester From: Chandler, George Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:25 PM To: Gaunce, Jean A. Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDFOD) Cc: Williams. Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George (cocrocooi'aFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive - CDC 1219 KB Jean and Jan: Please ?nd attached a speci?c request from the HOG. WEI-42 Us 52523.? I m, I concerning a project request to address directional air ?ow in an area oi proximate to HEM. I believe both of you are familiar with the project. which is described in some detail in the attachments, and are aware of the apparent controversy surrounding the proposed solutions (Le, directional air?ow change with or without anterooms, in the simplest terms). i am emailing you for your concurrence or. non-concurrence with the proposal in Directive not that I am questioning the wisdom of the HOG at all: it's simply that if there are major concerns that some views on this have not been heard I do not want to get a major change order in the-middle of the Project. or to have the issue inadvertently escalate to the 12th ?oor without making sure that opposing views have been properly evaluated by the full HOG. or in accordance With the HOG's approval charter. I understand that a speedy resolution of this issue is quite important just want to make sure that there is consensus on this or at least informed consent from the appropriate governance structure. Thanks! GI- ibis-42 Li I?m not sure if HOG later regarding the basis Below (pdf file) is the scanned copy of the directive signed by members were recipients of this directive. HOG members did'recewe'a'memmrorr for design and construction of this project. i have attached it below. Thanks, .J .. .1 ATTIDHEI Jeff Ali: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandler from HOG Manager install scope as described. Please note window of duration (July 3-24) that is being planned ror snutoow accommodate the construction effort. LLS Ci 252mb} ith directive to of Vivarium to Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from CD, ?nalization of scope, market survey and preliminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG committee of current statu 5. Thanks. Paul Probst. PE Asst. Din, Operations BFOfFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: Mathe. cheeter (cocrocoorosesi From: I sesame: Sent: Thursday. April 22. 2010 1:55 PM To: Chandler. George (ODCIOGOOIBFO) Cc: Nicholson. Janet Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO Bowen. Ken L. Williams. Jeffery Howard, {Bill} Walpole. Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: - Vivarium project P2009453 schedule George. use a In a HOG meeting held earlier today. Paul Probst presented a preliminary schedule for the Vivarium- airmi'n-i reversal project (P2009453: see attachment}. Members of the HOG view the timing of the project to be completely unacceptable. and is nowhere close to the timeframe that was indicated in a March 8 memo to Paul {in which the HOG and OHS requested that the project move attached). In a meeting held on March 22. Ken Bowen offered up some solutions that could expedite the process. but evidently they were not incorporated into the planning. if the proposed schedule is followed. the Vivarium would be shut down at an inopportune time for the programs utilizing the spaceDivision and that could prove to be very disruptive. i believe that there are solutions to this problem. and that the project can be expedited if all options are considered. HOG members are available to meet with you to discuss the situation if you so choose. - F200 9453 H0 Procurement (Eldocx l?l C: Task Name Issue to PGO Construction Procurement Award Contract Safetnyecuray/Mobilization Shop Drawing Submittals Equipment Release Lab Shut Down Date OHS Decon Mechanical Test and Blance OHS Smoke Test Walk Through Punch List Lab Re-opens Duration 1 day 23 days 15 days 15 days 30 days 40 days 1 day 3 days 22 days 5 days 5 days 5 days 1 day Start Mon 8/16/10 Mon 3(15110 Thu Wed 10f5f10 Wed 10/61'10 Wed 11/17/10 Mon Mon 1117/11 Thu Mon 2/21f11 Mon Mon 2/28/11 Mon 3f7/11 HnEh Mon Wed 9f15f10 Wed Tue l?fl?flo Tue 10 Tue 1/11f11 Mon 1f17f11 Wed 1f19/11 Fri 2/13f11 Fri 22/25/11 Fri 314m Fri 3/4/11 Mon 312/11 Public Health Service "s DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 8: HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 4 trhd? Memorandum Date: March 8, 2010 From: 252mm Ib}i3}:42 USE ?2523i 1'; Of?ce of Health and Safety To: Paul Frobst Building 18 Engineer FMEO 2o23uli: CC: Ken Bowen Director, FMEO Subject - Vivarium Project (P2009453) Paul, 3 erations Grou - HOG which has been chartered to oversee pi - The members of the Building u. operations ofall spaces in the a {bug}.ch agreed to initiate a request for a HVAC modi?cation project to change 252m: to a Grey Corridor by directing the air from the corridor into the respective animal holding oonis. rioect P2009453 was developed to accomplish this reversal of air ?ow. its scope of work included: the necessary changes to the facility HVAC systems; the addition of door sweeps; modi?cation to the glass panels in the doors to allow adequate air flow; the removal of the ?pingipong? air flow indicators; the removal of a door and frame at to be replaced with a wall and window? the addition of a anteroom containment the end of corridor barrier between the autoclave area and Bacon Room I a associated work. This project makes the building the second barrier of protection ort is acility. There is a tight window of opportunity when the Vivarium occupant operations can be shut down to accommodate the project schedule. The maximum allowable construction time is a three week period that runs from July 3rd through July 24th, 2010. Mission critical program operations must resume following the construction period. These changes are requested by the HOG and the Office-of Health and Safety to ensure the continued safety and health of the facility occupants. As the official Building and Facilities Office representative on the HOG, please provide any and all information to the HOG on the feasibility of this project. Sincerely, i U3 Cf 2E2ail'i?. Mathe, Chester From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFOJ Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 4:1? PM To: Walpole, Kenneth H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: VFD I agree with you, but he was the ?rst vendor to come back with a cost which I needed for my cost estimate. Not my choice either. Thanks, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 404-325-532? Fax: Wit-438456? em ail: KMoss @1211ch From: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 4:15 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: VFD Karen, In we need the 2 protocol. On a side note, if we do ecide to use not a big fan WW. I?ve had issues with them in the past inadvertentlw tri oing off line. We finally had to replace them with another vendor. Also, i believe all the existing drives in [glare and we may want to stick with them on the basis of Uniformity. Thanks. Ken From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 12:26 PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFU) Subject: FW: VFD Ken, See below, the drives are more expensive than I thought. Can you answer the Johnson Control question? I assume BACnet? . Thanks, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Desrgn Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 _.rtr: 1'13" ?11sz 830'." {1552? NH I. II 2?65? email From: Goodin, John i in mb rr om Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 12:12 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: VFD Karen (W04) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 11:56 AM To: Goodin, John Subject: RE: VFD Outdoors. yes and yes Thanks Karen Moss PE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Wit-4835313? Cell: Fax: email: KMosslf?Jodcgov From: Goodin, John Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 11:52 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: RE: VFD Karen Are the drives mounted indoors, or outdoors? Do you want a bypass [sta rter) included with them? Do you want a disconnect with them? Let me know and we can price them for you. Thanks John W. Goodin Atlanta Branch Manager Torn Barrow Companyr P: 404-605-366? F: 404-350-9121 C: 3-104-569-9132 ieoodin?ltombarrowcom From: Moss, Karen mailto:iso cdc. ov Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 2:12 PM To: Goodin, John Subject: RE: VFD How much for the 50 HP fans? Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1800 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: Nil-483266? Email: KMossl?r?cdc.gov From: Goodin, John Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 2:11 PM To: Moss, Karen Subject: RE: VFD Karen Yes we could provide Yaskawa variable frequency drives. Thanks John W. Goodin Atlanta Branch Manager Torn Barrow Companv P: 404-605-3667 F: 404-350?9121 C: 404-569?9132 iEDOdi?@t0m barrow.oom From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesda April 14, 2010 1:41 PM To: Subject: VFD John, if we decide to put VFD's on these fans do you provide? Karen Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 4044326682? Fax: email: mm Mathe, Chester From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, April 15. 2010 10:51 AM To: Walpole. Kenneth K. Subject: FW: CDC Bldg. Report -P2009453 Attachments: 19336-000 Surveypdf Ken, Attached is TaiB report for your review. Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-433-3307 Cell: 404-325-5327 Fax: mass?ass? em all: Kiv?lossl @cdc gov From: Jim Roberts Sent: Friday, January 22, 2.010 11:35 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: awood - willism com Subject: CDC Bldg. - TELB Report Karen see the attached; we have added the grille readings for the clean corridors and several door pressure differentials; in addition, we have used the drawings which you sent us to re?label everything; they can be printed out full size; if there are any; questions, please call Thanks - Jim Jim Roberts, Jr., RE, THE Presideni Operations TAB Services, inc. 5630 Oakbrook Suite 175 Norcross, Georgia 30093 office: 404-329-1001 fax: 404-3294445 mmfabservicescom irobertsr?ciliabservioesoom Page 1025 {bust-42 use. 262a(h) Page 102? U.S.C. 262mb} Page 1028 U.S.C. 262mb) Page 1029 {bli3?li42 U.S.C. 262a?h) Page 1030 {busy-.42 use. 262a(h] Page 1031 252a?h] Page 1032 U.S.C. 2625(h: Page 1033 use. 252mm Page 1034 11.3.0. 262a(h} Page 1035 use. 262a(h) Page 1035 {bum-42 use. 252a{hj Page 103? {bust-42 use. 262a{h} Page 1038 {mist-42 use. 262a(h] Page 1039 {mist-42 use. 262a(h] Page 1040 {nuance use. 252mm Page 1041 use. 252mm Page 1042 U.S.C. 2526mm! Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday. April 14, 2010 1:1? PM To: Moss, Karen Probst. Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIOSHE): Williams, Allison - (CDCIOIDKNCEZID) Cc: Howard. William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSH (coerciomcsao); Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Nogueira, William P. Ford, Maria Cristina Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID) .. Subject: RE: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test The date for this test has been changed to May 10'rI at 10:00 am. just want to clarity because the question has been asked; according to Steve Koob when one fan fails the vivarium will go positive instead of negative; air will ?ow out of the lab instead of into. Can OHS direct it we need to take any other precautions? As i understand the animals will be in hepa filtered cages or biobubbles. Than ks. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office; rro-4ss-saor Coll: amass-sag? Fax: email: KMossltoldegov From: Moss, Karen (CDCIDCOOXBFO) Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:01 PM MW Paul E. {CDC/ocooxsroxth K. (coclocoweFO); (sociocooxmst; 25am; Cc: Howard; William (Bill) Ibl[Ei! Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. (CDQOCOO BFO Noguelra, William P. Ford; Maria Cristina Powell, Nathaniel (CDC OID Subject: P2009453 - Fan Failure U-SE- Ladies and Gentlemen, I have the above referenced fan failure test scheduled for May T?Egt??ll?l?gq Required to be present at this test are Ken Walpole and his control .- hnician, Allison Williams andfor i' 1? ?8 John Goodin {Fan Manufacturer's Rep), Dave Welch (TAB Services]. and myself. The test will include the follow ng: it?ll-3W? 1.. ..Manually--tai-l at the starter on the roof. 5253.5 Observation of results physically and via controls at the roof andror penthouse. 2 Ugo, gage TAB Services to measure 3; record duct air ?ow and static pressure: damper position; damper pressure drop n-n airflow leakage; fan amperage and other data as deemed necessary. All measwements Will be take? 0? thereof," fail and repeat the above process. Visual of ping pong all reaction at the ?oor during the test and results recorded. Ken Walpole. John Goodin. David Welsh and myself will be on the roof at the fans performing the test. to provide visual of ping pong ball reaction and assist as needed. ARB is to be on hand for animal assistance if needed. The test is exacted to take approximately 4 hours. No one will be allowed on the -- -- excep Allison Williams and Call me if you have questions. Regards. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 mutton Road NE MS Atlanta Georgia 30333 "ell J. I .H. -- email $319351 ru' at: cm Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:01 PM To: Probst Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Inr'?l (cocrocoorosnla); Williams Allison (cocromrucezmld Em (CDCIOIDINCEZID) - Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocoorosnel; lcocrororucezio); Daniels, Charles E. Lingler. Arthur R. Nogueira, William P. Ford. Maria Cristina Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID) I Subject: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test U-S-C- Ladies and Gentlemen, I have the above referenced fan failure test scheduled for May at ?10:00 am. Required to be present at this test are [Eland his control nnician Allison Williams andlor John Goodin (Fan Manufacturer?s Rep.)1 TAB Services) and myself. The test will include the fol Iowi g: Manually fail Ihz-i?- at the starter on the roof. 2. Observation of results physically and via controls at the roof andl?or penthouse. 3. TAB Services to measure 8: record duct air flow and static pressure; damper position; damper pressure drop damper airflow leakage; fan amperage and other data as deemed necessary. All measurements will be taken on 331.1334? Egg. $2333Manually fail and repeat the above process. 6. Visual of ping pong ball reaction at the floor during the test and results recorded. I iJohn Goodin, David Welsh and myself will be on the roof at the fans performing the test. to provide visua of ping pong ball reaction and assist as neededfor animal assistance if needed; WIS 6 The teexected to take approximately 4 hours. No one will be allowed on the Vivarium area. during this leaked folio} excep Allison Williams and Call me if you have questions. Regards. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: rro-ess-ssor Cell; 4o4-szs-asz?r Fax: fitness-asst email: Khtossl@odc.ggy Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 9:34 AM To: Black, Carolyn Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery (cocrocoiDleFol; Campbell. John Michael (Mike) (cocrocoorsFoi; Keller, (Kathi) Walpole. Kenneth K. - i . 0 William (Bill) as (cocrocoorosnsl; Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. RE: P2009453 ibil3i-?42 U-B-C- HVAC Modifications 252aihi Subject: Dr. Black, The de-con room is not the green area outlined but the room opposite the shower anteroom {green area); the room is labeled but the print is small. The green area outside the showers referred to as the shower anteroom will be positive to the Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cens Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Managementotfice 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-s?i' Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: noses-33o? Cell: ?rod-assess? Fax: Nil-433266? email: From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 1:33 PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Keller, Kath Kathi w. Howard, William (Bill) Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. ingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009452 HVAC Modi?cations IiJllEii-iz US Thank you, Karen, this looks good. The only clarification issue that have is the term ?deoon area" you used. Are ou referrinc to the area outlined in green, just ?outside? the shower area? This area should be (Le. remain) positive tothe libit3)142 iauloclave area as indicated on the drawing. Please confirm that this will he the case. When the changes have been made, donning and dof?ng protocols can be modi?ed, as necessary, to adapt to the new air??ow patterns. Thanks again for your helpful revisions. Carolyn Black From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:26 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Keller, Kath Kathi a K. (coo/ocoorsFO); Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocooiiJHsi; Bowen, Ken L. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. (CDCIOCUOIBFD) Subject: RE: P2009453 U-S-C- HVAC Modi?cations a Ladies and Gentlemen, I made a few more revision to clarify based on meeting discussions. Regards, is: File: vivarium air flowevBFO.ppt Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M3 Krg? Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 404-325-552? Fax: emaiI1KrgossICi-zdogov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:52 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Keller, Kath Kathi Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) was Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Daniels, Chariss E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. Subject: P2009453 HVAC Modi?cations Ladies and Gentlemen, Attached are the minutes of our 3_22_2010 meeting. Please advise should you have any additions or corrections. Attached is the OHS air?ow diagram that I have revised to show the new wall location. Also, I have modi?ed the existing directional air flow for the decon area based on existing drawingsand the baseline test and balance that was done. The decon area is neutral to the dirty corridor; DHS to direct if this is to be maintain as neutral or changed as positive to the autoclave area as the future airflow arrows now indicate. Best Regards I- 0: File: vivarium air flow-bilihoward-revBFO.ppt File: P2009453 HV-AE Mod. Meeting'Mzinzutesgi?ai?f "Eng 3_22_2010.pdf Karen Moss FLE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representalive Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: amass-33o? Cell: 404?825-6552? Fax: email: KMossl.cdc.:gv Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIDSEP) From: 2523i?? (CDCKOIDINCEZI D) Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 8:18 Him To: Barrett, Timothy J. (CDCIODIOADSE he on lnger K. Howard. William ill) Wi- 1?52? (him-'42 U-S-C- 3032142 US. I 252301Probst Paul E. 1:42 (000locoorosem; Valle, Bessie M. (CDCIOSELSIP le, Kenneth K. Watts, Clark ?3303142 lea: Williams, Allison Zambuto, Laura R. {cocrommc Dr? I Subject: FW: P200945: HVAC Modi?cations - 000 586 KB From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:52 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jefferyr Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Keller, Kath Kathi Wal le Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) a Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOJBFD) Cc: Daniels, Charhs Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. (CDCIOCDOJBFO) Subject: P200945 HVAC Modi?cations Ladies and Gentlemen, Attached are the minutes of our 3_22_2010 meeting. Please advise should you have any additions or corrections. Attached is the OHS air?ow diagram that have revised to show the new wall location. Also, I have modi?ed the existing directional air ?ow for the decon area based on existing drawings and the baseline test and balance that was done. The decon area is neutral to the (bil3li42 OHS to direct it this is to be maintain as neutral or changed as positive to the autoclave area as the future at ow arrows now indicate. Best Re ards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-532? Fax: rrcaas-essr email: KMocsl @cdcyov Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday. March 31, 2010 2:31 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: FW: P2009453 U-S-C- HVAC Modi?cations - IXOS CDC 584 KB Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: WG-48 3-330? Cell: 4'04-325-682? Fax: email: Wool From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:52 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Keller, Kath Kathi Walole Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingier, Arthur R. Tanya A. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Subject: P2009453 gig}? U-S-C- HVAC Modi?cations Ladies and Gentlemen. Attached are the minutes of our meeting. Please advise should you have any additions or corrections. Attached is the CH8 air?ow diagram that I have revised to show the new wall location. Also, I have modi?ed the existing directional air ?existing drawings and the baseline test and balance that was done. The decon area is neutral to the OHS to direct if this is to be maintain as neutral or changed as positive to the autoclave area as the future airflow arrows now indicate. Best Reards. ATE-4093 Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 4014-8254382? Fax: 1"?0433?255? email: ?llings] Mathe, Chester (encrocoolrosem From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCODIBFQ Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:30 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subiect: FW: P2009453 03.0 HVAC Modi?cations - IXOS CDC 544 KB al Paul, Sorry I forgot to copy you. This the only update to report to the HOG at this point- Best Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-632? email: KMossl @cdceev From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCDDIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:26 PM To: M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Keller, Kath Kathi Walpole, Kenneth K, Howard, William (Bill) (coo/ocooioHS); Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. Subject: use. HVAC Modi?cations 252afh} Ladies and Gentlemen, I made a few more revision to clarify based on meeting discussions. Regards. I I Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: rte-433.330? Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: email: KMossl @cdc.gov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:52 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Keller, Kath Kathi Walole Kenneth K. (coqocoolsm); Howard, William (Bill) (encloses/0H5); Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Ce: Daniels, Charles E. Lingier, Arthur R. Tanya A. Subject: P2009453 (bll3'lz42 use. HVAC Modi?cations 262ath Ladies and Gentlemen, Attached are the minutes of our 3_22_2010 meeting. Please advise should you have any additions or corrections. Attached is the OHS air?ow diagram that have revised to show the new wall location. Also, i have modi?ed the existing directional air ?ow for the decon area based on existing drawings and the baseline test and balance that was done. The decon area is neutral to the OHS to direct if this is to be maintain as neutral or changed as positive to the autoclave area as the future air?ow arrows now indicate. Best Regards. 3195? File: vivarium air flow-hillhoward-revBFO.ppt 2o- File: P2009453 HVAC Mod 33231010.pdf Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: T7041 53-3307 Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: Will-483266? email: .Mosslracdcag Mathe, Chester From: Probst. Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, March 30. 2010 11:47 AM To: Moss, Karen Lingler. Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: B18 Vivarium Project KareniArt: I will be meeting with programs Thursday morning in HOG meeting. The Vivarium Project will be on the agenda and there will be an inquiry on status. I am assuming that all scope clari?cations were resolved last Monday. The next concern will be schedule. Do we have an).r preliminary info we can share? Paul F?robstI PE Asst. Din. Operations BFOiFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404?639-0505 Cell: 404-285?2560 Mathe. Chester Tanya A. Daniels. Charles E. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 11:00 AM To: Subject: FW: Project P2009453 Con?rmation Estimate Reference: Project P2009453 HVAC Modi?cations for {bjj33142 USC. 262ath} The Con?rmation Estimate for the above referenced project is within the Cost Range provided on the IFMS General screen of the project. The Confirmation Estimate for the project is $110,000 to >$700,000. Based on our current understanding and investigation of the project, we believe the project should not exceed $700,000. We recommend that the Board approve the project for DEMO to provide a full scope and estimate. The project is anticipated to be sent to P60 in May, 2010. This assumes approval ofthis project within 7 days of this e? mail. This is not a ?nal and complete schedule and is subject to revision during the design process. The Original Sco nuts: 42 0.5 . essaiiu Change. the to a clean corridor. This will require reversing the air flow from During the Con?rmation Estimate process the following additional information has been de?ned: Rovbal Campus R80 improvement Project is complex. Anticipated construction method is 8A Schedule is TED. Other options investigated but not developed i have sent the project to the Facilities Board for Approval through IFMS. Please contact me if you have any questions. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 K-EIT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 404-825-582? Fax: email: KMossi Program have to shut down their experiments and move out before construction can begin. Involvement of OHS, OSEP, ITSO, FMED, ARE and other support groups as required. Programs need 3 months notification before shut down to begin closing out experiments. (cocrocoomssp); {sociocooxossm Cc: Danieis, Charles E. Sent: Fri Mar 19 14:37:47! 2010 Subject ibil3i-?42 U-S-C- 2525th HVAC Modi?cations Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 2:52 PM To: Walpoi Kenneth Subject: Fw: ?313.3142 U-S-C- 2525 HVAC Modi?cations (hi Sent from my Wireless Handheld From: Moss Karen CDCXOCOOIBFO) qu?l. {bll3li42 Carolyn Powell, Nathaniel {bii3i142 (CDCIOIDINCZVED Danion, I [one i I . (bii3li42 Lambuto, Laura R. Walole Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. now:- We Williams, Jeffery Blanchard, Thomas M. Holmes, (cociocooronsx Barrett, Timothy J. (coerce/aces); Williams, Allison Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (sociocoo/ phen c. (cociocooism); Bowen, Ken L. (cociocooisFO); level-.42 ihjl?' When: Monday, March 22, 2010 3:00 PM Eastern Time St Canada). Where: Building (Selim? Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustmems. All, This meeting is being called due to concerns as outlined below. Schedule and shut down time need to be addressed as well. A meeting to go over the options to redirecting the air flow is desperater needed. i believe that a solution can be (or has been) arrived at. A Monday meeting would be very helpful to move this forward. Please see below correspondence. As the POD for the HOG, it's important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached file is an updated air?ow diagram from what i have seen in the past. The anteroom to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroom (green area} to the shower area is a concern from an engineering standpoint. because air will not flow as indicated in the diagram when the air?ow is reversed. Also. there are some concerns mentioned in Steve Milby's e-rnaii that are not addressed in either the directive or the attached diagram. Regards, Karen Dr. Black, I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the project request that was submitted to BFO. Please let me know if you. have any questions that we can answer. Pat and 1 will be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issue. Thank You. William Howard Thank you for this thoughtful response, Steve. Bill, Karen: would one or more of you be able to provide us with a diagram showing the direction of the air flows after the proposed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below in Steve's email including the changing area at the end of the hallway? Once we all have this information, perhaps a meeting to go over the information would be helpful? I understand that you all have already spent a lot of time discussing this but i would appreciate your clari?cation on the air flow directions for my own Understanding. This information is needed to support efforts on the part of staff to prepare new SOPs for the animal hUsbandry tasks. Thanks, Carolyn Dr. Black, I would be happy to talk to you and share what I have heard it you would like. This is obviousiy a complex issue and your question is a good one. My understanding is that the most recent plan is to make the central corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anterooms. According to Karen Moss, the DEMO engineer responsible for the project, there has been no ?nal direction on how pressure in the central corridor would relate to the changing area. She aiso has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the ciean side of-the cage decontamin Efmtoclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the West side. it might be helpful for you to speak to Karen, Bill Howard 0 about the ?nal direction on these qLIestions. There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms if SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding rooms support protections against cross contamination from the central corridor back into other holding rooms, if the issue of turbulence at the holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and if the pressure relationships between the central corridor and the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal opinion is that the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor shouid remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas, even it the central corridor is positive to the holding rooms. Karen is trying to understand and coordinate all of the diverse thoughts on this issue, and is more knowledgeable about the current status of the discussions than I am. Bill anwould also be good sources of information for you. support the need to have the views of the ARB staff that work in the area be heard, and that proper SOPs be developed to match any changes to the airflow in this area to make sure that working protocols reflect the new conditions. Thanks, SIEVE Hello, Steve: have been discussing this issue with several people within and outside of my division and was hoping you could answer a question for us. After the proposed air ?ow reversal in the vivarium is accomplished, what will be the status of the changing roomfshower area that is at the end of the hallway that is now ?dirty? but will become "gray" with the air flow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative with respect to the "gray" hallway? Thanks very much, Carolyn Cami)!? Black, PILD. Mattie, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: (cosiocoorOSHE) Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 11:44 AM To: Howard, William (Bill) Probst. Paul E. (cosiocooi'aFoi; Walpole. Kenneth K- Moss. Karen Subject: Re: air flow reversal in bldg. 1B 1iritian?um lhriefly spoke with Karen this morning and she feels need another internal meeting before she meets with us. So a Monday meeting appears to be off. will send out meeting information for us once she completes her internal discussions. Have a good weekend. Thanks Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: I DCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: .Frlda March 19 2010 11:26 AM To: loo, Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoolleFO); Walpole, Kenneth R. (coprocoorsFO) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIDSHE) Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bidg. 18 vivarium I can reserve a room, but someone else should issue the meeting request. Anytime Monday is good for me. From: Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 2:49 To: Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Subject: Re: air ?ow reversal in 18 vivarium Can someone set this up today Walpole. Kenneth K- Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCUOIOHS) Sent: Thu Mar 18 23:09:08 2010 Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium Guys: 1 will not be here Monday, but my absence should not matter. Based on earlier meeting today, it is my understanding is that Karen wants confirmation of pressure relationship requirements in a few areas that may not have yet been addressed. Ken and stressed the need for her to finalize scope so that the project could be negotiated with a contractor, who can then more clearly de?ne a realistic, doable schedule. Hope it goes well. Paul From: Sent: Thursda March 18, 2010 7:48 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium en.. From: Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 6:27 PM To: Probst Paul E. CyclocooraFO); Walpole Kenneth K. coo/ocoorseo) @252?: liveli- Subject: Re: air flow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium A meeting on Monday will be good. OHS would like this meeting to ONLY include people involved in the scope of the project, such as those who were supposed to meet today. OHS is not sitting down with a large group and getting into a 1 debate on the merits of this project again. With that said, I have no problem with Dr. Black attending. This will allow her to come up to speed on the project and also allow her to understand the well being of all vivarium workers is the driving force of this project. . This meeting should proceed in such a manner that we are working to resolve the issues we are faced with in order to help move this project forward. We should not constantly be presenting or creating issues on how or why the project can't move forward. i am off now and will not be responding to any more of these debates Ms. Moss is trying to create. of?ce on Monday. Otherwise, lbilf?i Thanks From: Moss, Karen To: Black, Carolyn lbw-3.541 U-S Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. (CD IUCOO Williams, Jeffery Mill; Stehen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. i- Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thu Mar 18 16:45:00 2010 Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium and ma: ill have to verify but I believe they are out all next week in training. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Will-488630? lCell: 404-325-682? Fax: Tim-480206? email: KMossltE'cdcgov From: Black, Carolyn Sen 18, 2010 4:44 PM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCODIBFO Milby Stehen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. (coclrocoorsro); Probst, Paul E. (cocxocoo/BFO) Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. 13 vivarium Thanks! Iwould be very pleased to participate and learn more. Carolyn mils 42 5202301; (CDCIOIDINCZVED) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:3? PM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Holmes, 2 David (cocrocoorOHS); Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (cocrocooxaFO) Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium All, A meeting to go over the options to redirecting the air ?ow is desperately needed. I believe that a solution can be (or has hasn?t arrived at. A Monday meeting would be very helpful to move this forward. From: Moss, Karen (CDCXOCOOKBFO) Sert: Thursday. Maren 18, 2010 4:04 PM To: Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Milby, Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIDCODJBFO) Subject: Fw: air flow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium Please see below correspondence. As the P00 for the HOG, It's important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached file is an updated air?ow diagram from whatl have seen in the past. The anteroom to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroom {green area) to the shower area is a concern from an engineering standpoint, because air will not flow as indicated in the diagram when the (bli33142 airflow is reversed. Also, there are some concerns mentioned in Steve Milby's e-mail that are not a resse in either the directive or the attached diagram. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ??0-433-8307 lCell: 404-825-6827 Fax: email: From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:58 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen (cocrocooraFol; (cocrocoozm-IS); Blanchard, Thomas M. (cocrocooxaFO); Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David Milby, Stephen c. (cocrocoorsFO) Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. 18 Vivarium Dr. Black, I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the project request that was submitted to BFO. Please let me know if you have any questions that we can answer. lat-la and Iwill be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issue. Thank You. Ilcilf'! l?l William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 633.614.?25? wch3@cdc.goy From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:39 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. Cc: Moss, Karen Ima- mil-E?- Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Nicholson, ma Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium Thank you for this thoughtful response, Steve. IE. would one or more of you be able to provide us with a diagram showing the direction of the air flows after the proposed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below inemail including the changing area at the end of the hallway? Once we all have this information, perhaps a meeting to go over the information would be - helpful? I understand that you all have already spent a lot of time discussing this but I would appreciate your clarification on the air flow directions for my own understanding. This information is needed to support efforts on the part of DSR staff to prepare new SOPs for the animal husbandry tasks. Thanks. Carolyn From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:25 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Mesa Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO): Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocooronsi; Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium Dr. Black, I would be happy to talk to you and share what I have heard it you would like. This is obviously a complex issue and your question is a good one. My understanding is that the most recent plan is to make the central corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anterooms. According to Karen Moss, the DEMO engineer responsible for the project, there has been no ?nal direction on how pressure in the central corridor would relate to the changing area. She also has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the clean side of the cage decontamination autoclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the West side. It might be helpful for you to speak to Karen, Bill Howard or about the ?nal direction on these questions. There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms if SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding rooms support protections against cross contamination from the central corridor back into other holding rooms, if the issue of turbulence at the holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and if the pressure relationships between the central corridor and the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal opinion is that the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor should remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas, even if the central corridor is positive to the holding rooms. Karen is trying to understand and coordinate all of the I se thoughts on this issue, and is more knowledgeable about the current status of the discussions than I am. Bill and ould also be good sources of information for you. I support the need to have the views of the ARES staff that work in the area be heard, and that proper SOPs be developed to match any changes to the airflow in this area to make sure that working protocols reflect the new conditions. Thanks, From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:42 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. Subject: air flow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium Importance: High Hello, Steve: I have been discussing this issue with several people within and outside of my division and was hoping you could answer a question for us. After the proposed airflow reversal in the vivarium is accomplished, what will be the status of the changing roomfshower area that is at the end of the hallway that is now ?dirty? but will become ?gray? with the air ?ow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative with respect to the ?gray? hallway? Thanks very much, Carolyn Corobvr M. Black, PILD. Director Division of Scienti?c Resources National Center for Emerging and Zoonotio Infectious Disasses CDC (4:34] 6393463 (404] 639-2155 fax chlack?cdogov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Prob-st, Paul E. Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 8:29 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Subject: Re: air flow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium Karen: if at all possible, lwould tn,f today to settle a meeting with OHS for Monday. Been thinking about the concerns with schedule. Although it is a much bigger project, we are using an 8A design-build contractor for the two chillers and towers at Roybal 14. 0-8 may be worth considering here. Sent from my BlackBerry' Wireless Handheld From: Probst, Paul E. To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOXBFO) I Sent: Thu Mar 18 23:36:50 2010 I Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. l8 Vivarium Karen: I understand that Bill and m" will be here Monday.r next week. butwill not be there rest of week. Paul From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:56 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: FW: air flow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium F'aul1 Sorry, I meant to copy you on this. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 D?ice: ??0?488-830? Cell: 404-825-8827" Fax: ??0-488-2867 email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Se Thursdav. Mare 18, 2010 4:04 PM To: Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Wiliiams, Jeffery (cocrocoorsFO); Black, Carolyn Milby, Stephen c. (cocrocoorlsFO); Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Subject: Fw: air ?ow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium Please see below correspondence. As the P00 for the HOG, it?s important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached tits is an updated airflow diagram from what i have seen in the past. The anteroom to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroom (green area} to the shower area is a concern from an engineering standpoint, because air will not ?ow as indicated in the diagram when the airflow is reversed. Also, there are some concerns mentioned in Steve Milby's e-mail that are not addressed in either the directive or the attached diagram. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1808 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: rte-4 88-330? Cell: 484-825-632? Fax: Wilt-488288? email: From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:58 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen (cocrocoo/sroi; (cocrocooronsn Blanchard, Thomas M. {cocrocoorsroy Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David Milby, Stephen C. Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium Dr. Black, I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the project request that was submitted to BFO. Please let me know if you have any questions that we can answer. at". and I will be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issua. Thank You. William Howard i CDC Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 673614325? wch3@cdc.gov From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:39 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO i Cc: M055. Karen (cocrocoorons); Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocoororis); 2 Blanchard, Thomas M. Nicholson, Janet Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium Thank you for this thoughtful response, Steve. Bill, Karen: would one or more of you be able to provide us with a dieing the direction of the air flows after the proposed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below in mail including the changing area at the end of the hallway? Once we all have this information, perhaps a meeting to go over the information would be helpful? I understand that you all have already spent a lot oftime discussing this but would appreciate your clari?cation on the air flow directions for my own understanding. This information is needed to support efforts on the part of staff to prepare new SOPs for the animal husbandry tasks. Thanks, Carolyn From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:25 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) (cociocoor0HS); Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: air?ow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium Dr. Black, I would be happy to talk to you and share what I have heard if you would like. This is obviously a complex issue and your question is a good one. My understanding is that the most recent plan is to make the central corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anterooms. According to Karen Moss, the DEMO engineer responsible for the project, there has been no final direction on how pressure in the central corridor would relate to the changing area. She also has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the clean side of the cage decontamina I utoclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the West side. It might be helpful for you to speak to Karen, Bill Howard or? about the ?nal direction on these questions. There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms if SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding rooms support protections against cross contamination from the central corridor back into other holding rooms, if the issue of turbulence at the holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and if the pressure relationships betvveen the central corridor and the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal opinion is that the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor should remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas, even if the central corridor is positive to the holding rooms. Karen is trying to understand and coordinate all of the diverse thoughts on this issue, and is more knowledgeable about the current status of the discussions than I am. Bill andwould also be good sources of information for you. support the need to have the views of the ARB staff that work in the area be heard, and that proper SOPs be developed to match any changes to the air?ow in this area to make sure that working protocols reflect the new conditions. Than ks, Steve From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:42 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. Subject: air ?ow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium Importance: High Hello, Steve: i have been discussing this issue with several people within and outside of my division and was hoping you could answer a question for us. After the proposed air ?ow reversal in the vivarium is accomplished, what will be the status of the changing roomlshower area that is at the end of the hallway that is now "dirty" but will become "gray" with the air flow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative with respect to the ?gray? hallway? Thanks very much. Carolyn M. Brock, PILD. Director Division of Scienti?c Resources National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases CDC (4'04) 639-3455 {4'04} 539-2155 fax chlack@cdegov Mathe, Chester Frcm: Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 7049 AM To: Probst, Paul E. M1142 Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Subject: Re: air flow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium Can someone set this up today Fro I I1. To: (coercio/chveo); (coprocoomi-IS); Walpole, Kenneth K. (coo/ocooxaeon Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCKOCOOJOHS) Sent: Thu Mar 18 23:09:08 2010 Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium Guys: .will not be here Monday, but my absence should not matter. Based on earlier meeting today. it is my understanding is that Karen wants con?rmation of pressure relationship requirements in a few areas that may not have yet been addressed. Ken and stressed the need for her to finalize scope so that the project could be negotiated with a contractor, who can then more clearly define a realistic. doable schedule. Hope it goes well. Paul 3= 11 - - - Sent: Thursda March 18, 2010 7:48 PM To: (cocrocoorom); Probst, Paul E. (coo/ocoorsFo), Walpole, Kenneth K. (coo/ocoorsFO) Cc: Howard, (Bill) Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium Amen. IEI From: (cocrocoozms; Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 6:27 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. It-tszeusc ?2B2amr Howard, William (Bill) Subject: Re: air ?ow reversal in bldg. 18 vivarium A meeting on Monday will be good. 0H8 would like this meeting to ONLY include people involved in the scope of the project. such as those who were supposed to meet today. OHS is not sitting down with a large group and getting into a debate on the merits of this project again. With that said, I have no problem with Dr. Black attending. This will allow her to come up to speed on the project and also allow her to understand the well being of all vivarium workers is the driving force of this project. . This meeting should proceed in such a manner that we are working to resolve the issues we are faced with in order to help move this project forward. We should not constantly be presenting or creating issues on how or why the project can't move forward. I am off now and will not be responding to any more of these debates Ms. Moss is trying to create. 1 If these meeting terms are acceptable and they are explained to Ms. Moss, Bill and i will be in the office on Monday. Otherwise, Thanks From: Moss, Karen To: Black, Carolyn mi"? ?3'3 59m? Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, mamas M. Williams, Jeffery Milb Stehen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFD) Sent: Thu Mar 13 16:45:00 2010 Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. [Dita 42 US 2?28Irii [til-i5: Bill and will have to verify but I believe they are out all next week in training. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Nil-458630? Cell: 404-825-632? Fax: noses-sear email: KMossl @cdcgav From: Black, Carolyn Sen 18, 2010 4:44 PM To: Inna. Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanc ar omas . Williams, Jeffery (CDCKOCOOIBFD Milby Stehen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (sociocooxsro) - I Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. i Thanks "mm" I would be very pleased to participate and learn more. Carolyn From: I 'bi'5= Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:37? PM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Milb Stephen C. Holmes, David (cos/ocooioHS); Daniels, Charles E. (cocxocooxmsy Probst, Paul E. (cociocoo/BEO) Subject: RE: air flow reversal in vi-variurn. LIE C. --252a[l1: All, A meeting to go over the options to redirecting the air flow is desperater needed. i believe that a solution can be (or has been) arrived at. A Monday meeting would be very helpful to move this forward. I'bli?'- From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:04 PM To: Cc: Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Milbv, Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. as? air?owreversal vivarium Please see below correspondence. As the P00 for the HOG, it's important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached file is an updated air?ow diagram from whatl have seen in the past. The anteroom to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroom {green area) to the shower area is a concern from an engineering standpoint, because air will not flow as indicated in the diagram when the airflow is reversed. Also, there are some concerns mentioned in Steve Milby's email that are not addressed in either the directive or the attached diagram. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?t?: Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: email: KMossl @cdc.gov From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:58 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David Milbv, Stephen [ml-3,42 2623'? Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bidg vivarium Dr. Black, I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the project request that was submitted to BFO. Please let me know if you have any questions that we can answer. and I will be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issue. Thank You. William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 6?8.614.7257 hard, Thomas M. (cocrocoorBF - Subject: RE: air?ow. vivarium From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:39 AM To: Milby, Stephen c. Cc: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) (coqococrOHS); lat-l5 lple'l Thank you for this thoughtful response, Bill. Karen: would one or more of you be able to provide us with a diagram showing the direction of the air ?ows after the proposed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below in Steve's email including the changing area at the end of the hallway? Once we all have this information, perhaps a meeting to go over the information would be helpful? I understand that you all have already spent a lot of time discussing this but I would appreciate your clari?cation on the air flow directions for my own understanding. This information is needed to support efforts on the part of DSR staff to prepare new SOPs for the animal husbandry tasks. Thanks, Carolyn From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:25 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss Karen (CDC/ococrsrol; (coo/ocoorcHS); Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. ivarium Dr. Black, I would be happy to talk to you and share what i have heard it you would like. This is obviously a complex issue and your question is a good one. My understanding is that the most recent plan is to make the central corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anterooms. According to Karen Moss, the DEMO engineer responsible for the project, there has been no ?nal direction on how pressure in the central corridor would relate to the changing area. She also has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the clean side of the cage decontamination autoclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the West side. It might be helpful for you to speak to Karen, Bill Howard [?rst aboutthe ?nal direction on these questions. There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms if SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding rooms sUpport protections against cross contamination from the central corridor back into other holding rooms, if the issue of turbulence at the holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and ifthe pressure relationships between the central corridor and the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal opinion is that the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor should remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas, even if the central corridor is positive to the holding rooms. Karen is trying to understand and coordinate all of the diverse thoughts on this issue, and is more knowledgeable about the current status of the discussions than I am. and would also be good sources of information for you. 1 support the need to have the views of the ARES staff that work in the area be heard, and that proper SOPs be developed to match any changes to the air?ow in this area to make sure that working protocols re?ect the new conditions. Thanks, Steve From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:42 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) us c: Subjectgmair?w reversal in'bldg. rivan'um Importance: High Hellol Steve: I have been discussing this issue with several people within and outside of my division and was hoping you could answer a question for us. After the proposed air flow reversal in the vivarium is accomplished, what will be the status of the changing area that is at the end of the hallway that is now "dirty" butwill become "gray" with the air flow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative with respect to the ?gray? hallway? Thanks very much, Carolyn Carma!" Black, PILD. Director Division at Scientific Resources National Center for Err-ergth and Zoonotic. Infectious Diseases CDC (4G4) 639-3466 {4134) 639-21 55 tax chladc@cdc.gev Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: To: Subject: Karen: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:3? PM Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIB I RE: air ?ow reversal in bidg. ivarium I understand that Bil] anili be here Monday next week, butwill not be there rest of week. Paul From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCUOXBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:56 PM To: Prohst, Paul E. U, Subject: FW: air ?ow reversal in bldg. ivarium Paul, Sorry, i meant to copy you on this. Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell.? 404-325-682? Farr. W0483-2567 email: KMossl@cdc.gcv From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:04 PM Tol Ith-I?} Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Milby, Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. Subject: Fw: air ?ow reversal in bldg., 2' ?3 ivarium Please see below correspondence. As the FCC for the HOG, it's important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached file is an updated airflow diagram from what I have seen in the past. The anteroom to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroom (green area) to the shower area is a concern from an engineering standpoint, because air will not flow as indicated in the diagram when the airflow is reversed. Also, there are some concerns mentioned in Steve Milbys e-mail that are not addressed in either the directive or the attached diagram. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-5327 I Fax: Wit?438256? email: KMoss @odc.gov From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:58 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. (cocrocoonsFO); Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David Milbv, Stephen l; with EgalagectcRE: airflow reversal Dr. Black, I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the project request that was submitted to BFO. Please let me know if you have any questions that we can answer. and I will be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issue. Thank You. William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 6?8.614.7257 wch3@cdc.gov From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2010 9:39 AM To: Milbv, Stephen C. (cocxocooreeo Cc: Moss, Karen {coprocooreF0); Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Nicholson, Janet (CDCXOIDIOD) tug-53,1? reversal. in um Thank you for this thoughtful response, Steve. Karen: would one or more of you be able to provide us with a diagram showing the direction of the air flows after the proposed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below in Steve?s email including the changing area at the end of the hallway? Once we all have this information, perhaps a meeting to go over the information would be helpful? I understand that you all have already spent a lot of time discussing this but I would appreciate your clarification on the air flow directions for my own understanding. This information is needed to support efforts on the part of DSR staff to prepare new SOPs for the animal husbandry tasks. Thanks, Carolyn From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2010 9:25 AM To: Black, Carolyn Co: Moss, Karen (coo/ocoorsro); (codocooroHS); Howard, William (Bill) (coaxed/OHS); [migh?glg ghard, Thomas M. BF air ?ow reversal in-bldg. ivarium Dr. Black, I would be happy to talk to you and share what I have heard if you would like. This is obviously a complex issue and your question is a good one. My understanding is that the most recent plan is to make the central corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anterooms. According to Karen lv'lossi the DEMO engineer responsible for the project. there has been no final direction on how pressure in the central corridor would relate to the changing area. She also has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the clean side of the cage decontamina autoclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the West side. it might be helpful for you to speak to Karen. Bill Howard or about the ?nal direction on these questions. There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms if SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding rooms support protections against cross contamination from the central corridor hack into other holding rooms, if the issue of turbulence at the holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and if the pressure relationships between the central corridor and the changing area clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal opinion is that the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor should remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas, even if the central corridor is positive to the holding rooms. Karen is trying to understand and coordinate all of the diverse thoughts on this issue, and is more knowledgeable about the current status of the discussions than lam. Bill and ould also be good sources of information for you. I support the need to have the views of the ARB staff that work in the area be heard. and that proper SOPs be developed to match any changes to the airflow in this area to make sure that working protocols reflect the new conditions. Thanks. Steve From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:42 AM Milby, Stephen C. reversal. in bias ivan'um Importance: High HelloI Steve: I have been discussing this issue with several people within and outside of my division and was hoping you could answer a question for us. After the proposed air flow reversal in the vivarium is accomplished, what will be the status of the changing roomlshower area that is at the end of the hallway that is now ?dirty? but will become ?gray?r with the air flow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative with respect to the "gray" hallway? Thanks very much, Carolyn Camiyn Black, PILD. Director Division of Scienti?c Resources National Ce nter for Emerging and Zoonotic lnfectioua Diseases CDC (404;: ass-3466 (404} 639-2155 fax oblaclt@cdc.gov Inn? 42 ZBEalhv lb?3x42 Mathe. Chester From: DCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: 3, 2010 11:09 PM To: :cocmlomceaol: lcocrocooloslls}; Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) g: Howard, William (Bill) OOIOSHE) '?hiecl: .. .. REL-airflow reversal in-bldg; ivarium Guys: i will not be here Monday, but my absence should not matter. Based on earlier meeting today, it is my understanding is that Karen wants con?rmation of pressure relationship requirements in a few areas that may not have yet been addressed. Ken and stressed the need for her to ?nalize scope so that the project could be negotiated with a contractor, who can then more clearly de?ne a realistic, doable schedule. Hope it goes well. Paul '22 - - - - Sent: Thursda March 18, 2010 7:48 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoolsFO); Walpole, Kenneth K. (momma/em) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (coo/ocoo OHS) Amen. From: (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 6:27 PM Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, william (Bill) (cocrocooroHS) ivarium A meeting on Monday will be good. OHS would like this meeting to ONLY include people involved in the scope of the project, such as those who were supposed to meet today. OHS is not sitting down with a large group and getting into a debate on the merits of this project again. With that said, I have no problem with Dr. Black attending. This will allow her to come up to speed on the project and also allow her to understand the well being of all vivarium workers is the driving force of this project. . This meeting should proceed in such a manner that we are working to resolve the issues we are faced with in order to help move this project forward. We should not constantly be presenting or creating issues on how or why the project can't move forward. I am off now and will not be responding to any more of these debates Ms. Moss is trying to create. If these meeting terms are acceptable and they are explained to Ms. Moss, Bill and I will be in the of?ce on Monday. Otherwise, {bli5i Thanks From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Black, Carolyn Howard, William (Bill) 1 ,?egg: Thu Mar 13 16:45:00 2010 Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCODIBFO Milb Stehen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. till-la!- Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCDDIBFO) Subject:.RE.: air?ow .. vivarium Bill and will have to verify but i believe they are out all next week in training. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting OffiCer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: CII: 404*325682? Fax: 7?0-438-2567 email: Khtuss @cdc.gov From: Black, Carolyn ll 18, 2010 4:44 PM - - - . Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIDCDOXBFO Milbv Stehen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. Probst, BaulsE. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: air ?owrev'er?s'al bldg. ivarium Thanks, I would be very pleased to participate and learn more. Carolyn thSEtE E?zmh: From:l Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:37 PM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Mill: Stephen C. Holmes, David (coclocoolonsl; Daniels, Charles E. (CDciocooxan); (coclocooroHS); Probst, Paul E. (see/ocooxam) Subjecu' 'a'ir ?'ow'reversal' All, A meeting to go over the options to redirecting the air flow is desperater needed. i believe that a solution can be (or has I: arrived at. A Monday meeting would he very helpful to move this forward. HE From: Moss, Karen Se .1 13, 2010 4:04 PM To: Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. wnliams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Milby, Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. g?blestifw: reversattn livariurn rbh?l Please see below correspondence. As the P00 for the HOG, its important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached file is an updated airflow diagram from what I have seen in the past. The anteroom to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroom (green area) to the shower area is a concern from an engineering standpoint, because air will not flow as indicated in the diagram when the air?ow is reversed. Also, there are 'some concerns mentioned in Steve Mitby's e-mail thatare not addressed in either the directive or the attached diagram. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Cities: Cell: 404-325-532? Fax: email; KMoslerEcdcgov From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:58 AM To: Black, Carolyn (cocono/Ncr?octo Cc: M055. Karen (cocxocowonsy Blanchard, Thomas M. (coczocoorsFO); Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Holmes, David Milhv, Stephen C. Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. r3:t?:l2 ivarium Dr. Black, I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the project request that was submitted to BFD. Please let me know if you have any questions that we can answer. Pat and I will be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issue. Thank You. William Howard CDC Fatility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.21?4 6?8.614.?25? wch3@cdc.gov From: Black, Caroiyn Sent: Thursday, Marchal?, 2010 9:39 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. Cc: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Nicholson, Janet Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. ivarium Thank you for this thoughtful response, Steve. -, Karen: would one or more of you be abie to provide us with a diagram showing the direction of the air flows after the proposed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below in Steve?s email including the changing area at 3 the end of the hallway? Once we all have this information, perhaps a meeting to go overthe information would be helpful? i understand that you all have already spent a lot oftime discussing this but I would appreciate your clari?cation on the airflow directions for my own understanding. This information is needed to support efforts on the part of DSR staff to prepare new SOPs for the animal husbandry tasks. han ks, Carolyn From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:25 AM To: Blackyr Carolyn Cc: Moss Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ: Howard, William (Bill) (sociocooioHSJ; m3 Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIB I item. SubjecttR-E: air ?ow reversal in-bId-g. - ivarium Dr. Black I would be happy to talk to you and share what I have heard it you would like. This is obvioust a complex issue and your question is a good one. - My understanding is that the most recent Ian is to make the central corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anterooms. According to the DEMO engineer responsible for the project, there has been no final direction on how pressure in the central corridor would relate to the changing area. She also has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the clean side of the cage decontamina.? utoclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the West side. it might be helpful for you to speak to Karen, Bill Howard orm?lE? about the final direction on these questions. There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms if SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding rooms support protections against cross contamination from the central corridor back into other holding rooms. it the issueof turbulence at the holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and if the pressure relationships between the central corridor and the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal opinion is that the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor should remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas, even ifthe central corridor is positive to the holding rooms. a a. Karen is trying to understand and coordinate all of the a se thoughts on this issue, and is more knowledgeable about the current status of the discussions than I am. Bill and would also be good sources of information for you. I support the need to have the views of the staff that work in the area be heard, and that proper SOPs be developed to match any changes to the airflow in this area to make sure that working protocols reflect the new conditions. Thanks, Steve I -. Ibl[3: :12 .c 2623th From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:42 AM 0' Milby, Stephen C. 0) flow reversal in bldg?vivarium Importance: High Hello. Steve: I have been discussing this issue with several people within and outside of my division and was hoping you could answer a question for us. After the proposed air ?ow reversal in the vivarium is accomplished, what will be the status of the changing roomlshower area that is at the end of the hallway that is now ?dirty? but will become ?gray? with the air flow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative with respect to the "gray" hallway? Thanks very much, Carolyn Carolyn M. Biack, PILD. Director Division of Scienti?c Resuurcea National Center for Emerging and Zuonotic Infectious Diseases CDC {404] 63943466 (404) 639-2155 fax chlack@cdc. cw Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: ?it icocrommcezml Sent: Thursda . March 18, 2010 7:48 PM To: was: (coprocoomsnel; Probst, Paul E. (cosiocooreFm; Walpole, Kenneth K. cocrocoo BFO Cc: i: (coo. oorosnel Subject: RE: air ?ow reversa In bldg. vivarium EFL. From: (coo/ocooloag Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 5:2? PM To: Probst, Paul E. (coo/ocoolsFO); Walpole, Kenneth K. mils- [jg-gmlee-j(cocrocoorOHSJ Subject: Re: air ?ow reversal in m1- vivarium A meeting on Monday will be good. OHS would like this meeting to ONLY include people involved in the scope of the project. such as those who were supposed to meet today. OHS is not sitting down with a large group and getting into a debate on the merits of this project again- With that said. I have no problem with Dr. Black attending. This will allow her to come up to speed on the project and also allow her to understand the well being of all vivarium workers is the driving force of this project. . This meeting should proceed in such a manner that we are working to resolve the issues we are faced with in order to help move this project forward. We should not constantly be presenting or creating issues on how or why the project can't move forward. I am off now and will not be responding to any more of these debatesis trying to create. If these meeting terms are acceptable and they are explained to and I will be in the office on Monday. Othenlvise. (bli5l Thanks liLHiEIi From: Moss, Karen To: Black, Carolyn - - - .- . mas M. Williams, Jeffery (cocrocoorBFo - Milb Stehen C. (cocrocooloHS); Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thu Mar 18 16:45:00 2010 Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg. .33; lbll'?; will have to verify but I believe they are out all next week in training. Karen Moss FEE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officens Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 1104-8254582? Fax: emalt: From: Black, Carolyn Se 1" Thurs-rim: Marr?i 18, 2010 4:44 PM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Milbv Stehen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. ProbSt; Paul E. m: Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg?au vivarium Thanks, Iwould be very pleased to participate and learn more. Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:3? PM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Milb Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. (coo/ocoorsrox (morocco/one); Probst, Paul E. I. L, Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg??tg 'ivarium All, A meeting to go over the options to redirecting the airflow is desperater needed. I believe that a solution can be (or has arrived at. A Monday meeting would be very helpful to move this forward. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:04 PM To: Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Miiby, Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. Subject: FW: air flow reversal in bldg. ivarium Please see below correspondence. As the POD for the HOG, it?s important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached file is an updated air?ow diagram from what i have seen in the past. The anteroom to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroom (green areaconcern from an engineering standpoint, because air will not flow as indicated in the diagram when the air?ow is reversed. Also, there are some concerns mentioned in Steve Milbv?s e?mail that are not a - resse in either the directive or the attached diagram. Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 710-433-3307 Cell: 404?825-6827 Fax: mass-ass? email: KMossl@cdc.gov lb?3t42 252mm 42 :12 25231?!- From: Howard, william (Bill) (cocrocoo/oHS) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:53 AM To: Black, Carolyn cc: Moss Karen (cocrocooreFO); Blanchard, Thomas M. (cocyocooxsso); (coo/promo); Gaunce, Jean A. Hoirnes, David (coclocoorOHS); Milby, Stephen Ic. (EJCDCIOCOOIBFO) Dyivarium Dr. Black, est; aic?ow..reversal. in. bldg. I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the project request that was submitted to BFD. Please let me know if you have any questions that we can answer. Pat and I will be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issue. Thank You. William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 6?8.614.725? From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2010 9:39 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCJOCOOIBFO Cc: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) glahghard, Thomas M. iicholson, Janet Still] air?ow-reversal ivarium Thank you for this thoughtful response, Bill, Karen: would one or more of you be able to provide us with a diagram showing the direction of the air flows after the proposed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below in Steve's email including the changing area at the end ofthe hallway? Once we all have this information, perhaps a meeting to go over the information would be helpful? I understand that you all have already spent a lot of time discussing this but I would appreciate your clari?cation on the air flow directions for my own understanding. This information is needed to support efforts on the part of DSR staff to prepare new SOPs for the animal husbandry tasks. Thanks. Carolyn From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:25 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen (cocrocooram); (cocyocoolom); Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocoo/OHSJ; Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIB I .aic?ow reversal in Dr. Black, I would be happy to talk to you and share whatl have heard ifyou would like. This is obviously a complex issue and your question is a good one. My understanding is that the most recent plan is to make the central corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anterooms. According to Karen Moss, the DEMO engineer responsible forthe project. there has been no ?nal direction on how pressure in the central corridor would relate to the changing area. She also has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the clean side of the cage decontamination autoclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the West side. It might be helpful for you to speak to Karen, Bill Howard about the ?nal direction on these questions. There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms it SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding rooms support protections against cross contamination from the central corridor back into other holding rooms, it the issue of at the holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and if the pressure relationships between the central corridor and the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal opinion is that the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor should remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas, even if the central corridor ts positive to the holding rooms. Karen is trying to understand and coordinate all of the diverse thoughts on this issue, and is more knowledgeable about the current status of the discussions than I am. Bill and would also be good sources of information for you. support the need to have the views of the ARB staff that work in the area be heard. and that proper SOPs be developed to match any changes to the air?ow in this area to make sure that working protocols reflect the new conditions. Thanks, Steve From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March HE, 2010 8:42 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. I 0) Subject: air flow reversal in bldg: .v vivarium Importance: High Hello. Steve: I have been discussing this issue with several people within and outside of my division and was hoping you could answer a question for us. After the proposed air flow reversal in the vivarium is accomplished, what will be the status of the changing rooml'shower area that is at the end of the hallway that is now ?dirty? but will become ?gray? with the air flow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative with respect to the "gray" hallway? Thanks very much, Carolyn Caro-?r" Black, PILD. Director Division of Scienti?c Resources Nat?onal Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases CD {404) 639?3456 [404) 639-2T 55 fax cblack@odc.gov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: (coolocomoSHE) Sent: Thursday, March ?18, 2010 6:27 PM To: F?robst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Sanchez, Anthony (CDCIOI Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: Re: air flow reversal in bldg. vivarium A meeting on Monday will be good. OHS would like this meeting to ONLY include people involved in the scope of the project, such as those who were supposed to meet today. DHS is not sitting down with a large group and getting into a debate on the merits of this project again. With that said, I have no problem with Dr. Black attending. This will allow her to come up to speed on the project and also allow her to understand the well being ofall vivariurrl workers is the driving force of this project. - This meeting should proceed in such a manner that we are working to resolve the issues we are faced with in order to help move this project forward. We should not constantly be presenting or creating issues on how or why the project can?t move forward. I am off now and will not be responding to any more of these debates Ms. Moss is trying to create. it these meeting terms are acceptable and they are explained to Ms. Moss, Bill and I will be in the of?ce on Monday. Otherwise, {bll5i Thanks Ibi- l?i From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODJBFO) To: Black, Carolyn (coczoroiilcrloczo); Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, ThomesM. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOXBFO Milt: Stehen C. (cociocoo/BFo); Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFD) Sent: Thu Mar 18 16:45:00 2010 Subject: RE: air flow reversal in vivan'um Bill and will have to verify but I believe they are out all next week in training. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: 30488-266? email: KMossl @cdcgov From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2010 4:44 PM MOSS, Karen Howard, William (Bill) 1 Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Milby Stehen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) [m Subject: RE: air flow reversal in bldg. vivarium Thanks, I would be very pleased to participate and learn more. Carolyn From: (cocxoromczveo) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:3? PM To: Moss, Karon Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Milb Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: air ?ow reversal in bldg.vivarium All, A meeting to go over the options to redirecting the air flow is desperately needed. I believe that a solution can be (or has been) arrived at. A Monday meeting would be very helpful to move this forward. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursda March 18, 2010 4:04 PM - (coo/atomczveo) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Black, Carolyn Milby, Stephen C. Holmes, David Daniels, Charles E. IOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: air ?ow reversal in hldg. 'i ivarium Please see below correspondence. As the P00 forthe HOG, it?s important that we share this correspondence and the diagram with you. The attached ?le is an updated airflow diagram from whatl have seen in the past. The anteroom to the shower area was not addressed in the HOG directive. This anteroom (green area) to the shower area is a concern from an engineering standpoint, because air will not ?ow as indicated in the diagram when the airflow is reversed. Also, there are some concerns mentioned in Steve Milby?s e-mail that are not addressed in either the directive or the attached diagram. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 404-325?582? Fax: email: KMosai @cdc.gov From: Howard, (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:58 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean .4. Holmes, David Milby, Stephen 2 ?323'? Subject-"RE: airflow reversal "inbidg. vivarium Dr. Black, I have attached the conceptual drawing that OHS prepared. It will provide a visual representation of the project request that was submitted to BFO. Please let me know if you have any questions that we can answer. Pat and I will be glad to meet with you and your staff to discuss this issue. Thank You. William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Of?ce of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 wch3@cdc.gov From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:39 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. Cc: Moss. Karen (coo/ocooraroy -. (cocrocoorOHS); Howard, willram (Bill) (cocrocoorOHS); Thomas M. Janet RE: . ivarium Thank you for this thoughtful response, Steve. Bill. this" Karen: would one or more of you be able to provide us with a diagram showing the direction of the air flows after the prop sed change that also includes all of the areas mentioned below in Steve's email including the changing area at the end of the hallway? Once we all have this information, perhaps a meeting to go over the information would be helpful? I understand that you all have already spent a lot oftime discussing this but i would appreciate your clari?cation on the air flow directions for my own understanding. This information is needed to support efforts on the part of staff to prepare new SOPs for the animal husbandry tasks. Thanks, Carolyn From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:25 AM To: Black, Carolyn Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCKOCOOXOHSE Howard, William (Bill) Blanchard, Thomas M. Elvivarium i Dr. Black, I would be happy to talk to you and share whatl have heard if you would like. This is obviously a complex issue and your question is a good one. My understanding is that the most recent plan is to make the central corridor positive to the holding rooms without the addition of anterooms. According to Karen Moss, the DEMO engineer responsible for the project. there has been no ?nal direction on how pressure in the central corridor would relate to the changing area. She also has a question of whether the central corridor would be positive or negative to the clean side of the cage decontamination autoclaves or to the outer clean corridor on the West side. It might be helpful for you to speak to Karen. Bill Howard 0 about the ?nal direction on these questions. There has been a lot of discussion on this issue. My thoughts are that the central corridor should be made positive to the holding rooms if SOPs for cage decontamination before leaving the holding rooms SUpport protections against cross contamination from the central corridor back into other holding rooms, if the issue of turbulence at the holding room doors based on the direction of swing can be resolved and if the pressure relationships between the central corridor and the changing area, clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor can be addressed. My personal opinion is that the changing area. clean side of the decontamination autoclaves and the outer clean corridor should remain positive to the central corridor since there is the possibility of more contamination in the central corridor than those areas, even if the central corridor is positive to the holding rooms. Karen is trying to understand and coordinate all of the diverse thoughts on this issue, and is more knowledgeable about the current status of the discussions than I am. Bill andwould also be good sources of information for you. I support the need to have the views of the ARB staff that work in the area be heard. and that proper SOPs be developed to match any changes to the airflow in this area to make sure that working protocols reflect the new conditions. Thanks, Steve mils-.42 252mm From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 3:42 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIUCOOIBFO) Stil?bjegt: git? reversal. in .bldg vivari um Importance: High Hello, Steve: have been discussing this issue with several people within and outside of my division and was hoping you could answer a question for us. After the proposed airflow reversal in the vivarium is accomplished, what will be the status of the changing room/shower area that is at the end of the hallway that is now ?dirty? but will become ?gray? with the air flow change? Will this changing area be positive or negative with respect to the "gray" hallway? Thanks very much. Carolyn Care-[Jul Black, Director Division at Scienti?c Resources National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases CDC- {404} 639-3466 {404) 639-2155 fax cblack@cdc.gov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday. April 01, 2010 3:54 PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: BFO Meeting Minutes - 34 8-2010 suggest a meeting between myself, you, Art, Paul and T83 people. I'll set it up. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: emait: EMossl (rig-zoo. gov From: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 3:49 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIDCDOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: BFO Meeting Minutes - 3-18-2010 Karen, Just a couple of comments. 1. The constant volume phoenix valves are typically set via manual hardware adjustments made at the valve. 2. After learning more about the scope of work for this project, I'm re?considering my previous comments regarding 3'"1 party commissioning. I think you and Paul were on the right track with self performing this activity. Now that the scope is finalized, perhaps the three of us should discuss this option further. 3. We briefly discussed the fan failure test today at the HOG meeting and there?s some confusion regarding how the test will be conducted what the risks are to ARB areas. suggest you put together an outline to explain the processl'procedures that will be used for testing the exhaust fans. We can forward that to HOG members so they understand exactly what?s going to happen during the shutdown. Let me know what you think. Thanks, Ken From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 2:34 PM To: Tyler, John Lingler, Arthur R. Probst, Paul E. Walpole, 1 Kenneth K. Nogueira, William P. Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: BFO Meeting Minutes - 3-18-2010 AIL Attached are the minutes from our mantis,? please let me know if you have any additions or corrections. (3}?42 File: P2009453 Mod. m: Meeting Minutes BFO only 3_18_2010.pdf Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road MS K197 Atlanla. Georgia 30333 dilate I i.i:I in: riff-fl Jill)?" email gums-i Mathis, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday. March 31, 2010 2:26 PM To: Blanchard. Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Kellar, (Kathi) (CDCIOIDINCEZID *Wa ole Kenneth K. (Bill) (cocrocoorOSHE); icocrocoorOSi-iei; we Bowen. Ken L. . Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. Subject: RE: P2009453 sea HVAC Modi?cations Ladies and Gentlemen. I made a few more revision to clarify based on meeting discussions. Regards, vivarium air flowr. . . Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: tire-43343307 Cell: aromas-seer Fax: mass?25st a mail: r?icdc. gov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:52 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Keller, Kath Kathi Walpole, Kenneth K. (cocrocooiaFci); Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocooroHs); I ,mna: I Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 SSB {bii3izr12 HVAC Modi?cations Ladies and Gentlemen, Attached are the minutes of our meeting. Please advise should you have any additions or corrections. Attached is the OHS airflow diagram that I have revised to show the new wall location. Also, have modified the existing directional air flow for the decon area based on existing drawings and the baseline test and balance that was done. The decon area is neutral to the HS to direct if this is to be maintain as neutral or changed as positive to the autoclave area as the future airflow arrows now indicate. 1 Best Regards. File: vivariurn air flow-bilIhcward-revBFO.ppt File: P2009453 HVAC Meeting Minutes 3_22_2010.pdf Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-97 Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Fthce FM 488-330? rbell :04 $125-$327 Fa: 770458-2567 email. RMng'gIr?g??' Page 1094 use. 252mm Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 311 2010 1:52 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell. John Michael (Mike) Black. Carolyn Kellar, (Kathi) (CDCIOIDINCEZID Walole Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO Howard William (Bill) (cocrocoorosw); (cocrocoomsHE); (coerciomcezm); Bowen. Ken L. (coo/ocooreaol Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. (CDCIOCO Subject: P2009453 Ladies and Gentlemen, lbll3ii42 HVAC Modi?cations Attached are the minutes of our meeting. Please advise should you have any additions or corrections. Attached is the OHS airflow diagram that have revised to show the new wall location. Also. I have modified the existing directional air?ow for the decon area based on existing drawings and the baseline test and balance that was done. The decon area is neutral to the lbll3li42 OHS to direct it this is to be maintain as neutral or changed as positive to the autoclave area as the future ai ow arrows now indicate. Best Regards. - II P2009453 -- anc Mod. .. runo- Page 1096 use. 252.3(th MW METER HEALTHIER smile: MEETING MINUTES Center for Disease Control and Prevention C.- ?mm and? a. Date: March 22, 2010 Subject: P2009453 Building ModificaaonlinEi-?? U-S-C- Location: Building 20 Conference Room Attendees: Karen Moss DEMO Tom Blanchard - BFO Jeff Williams BFO Mike Campbell CJMO Dr. Black DSR Kathi Keller DSR Bill Discussion: BFO is workin toward the directive received from the HOG to reverse the air?ow in the U.S.C. Dr- Black had sent an inquiry to Steve Milby on what would be the status of the shower room change area if the air?ow was reversed. Dr. Black wants to know that he shower changer room area would be positive with respect to the (bi. response is that from an engineering standpointto make the shower area positive as shown on OHS ?ow diagram is not possible when the airflow in the (133(31142 U5- is reversed (Le. made positive instead of negative). Also per Steve Milby the autoclaves may not have bioseals and that is another engineering concern. 0 The HOG directive has asked BFO to perform this construction within three weeks and BFO is concerned about that time frame with the amount of work that needs to be done. II "imp, 3 suggested building a wall to separate autoclave area from animal holding I_L area. He suggested routing supply ductwork exposed down the II However, this option was discussed at the beginning of the project was determined not to be an option. All ductwork will be routed in interstitial space per CDC standards. Slab will have to be core drilled to add supply air diffusers to dirty corridor. Time constraint issue is the major issue; the main playing factor is that the programs. have limited down time. As of today there is only a conception of scope of work. There are still many weeks to a hard design. Then a contractor will come on board and that contractor may not be able to commit to 3 weeks until he has reviewed design documents. It was noted that'ibll3li42 I was down for 3 months. For the window of opportunity for construction is July I to August 1. Approximately 1 month of prep work will be required in the interstial space. PGO needs 6 weeks for bid process. Normal time frame is 6 to '7 weeks is with an 8A through PGO which is not an open bid process. A sonogram of the post tension cables will be required to core holes in slab. All pipe, ductwork and controls can be done in interstitial. The gas tight dampers have a l2 week delivery time. The exhaust fan issue is a major problem. Per Mike Campbell to have construction from July 1st to August is not possible with the way CDC procurement process is set up. BFO will modify OHS air?ow diagram to reflect the new wall and circulate. PPE currently comes off in the positive pressure shower room anteroom and will be done the same in the future. OHS stated that with supply air in back into a like room. BFO asked OHS if they desi ?e a directional air path through the new wallr?door (between autoclave area and am? when the door is closed. OHS replied that is does not matter because the diseases are contained in the animal rooms. Dr. Black and Kathi Keller indicated a slider door would be preferred over a standard door. An automatic would prevent the door being left open; however, OHS stated that is a matter of protocol. Dr. Black stated cages would be easier to get through a sliding door. If the door does not slide it would be same size as the animal holding doors. A sliding door will take more space. If there is a need for more space the door could be brought back to the janitorial closet. The door might be too close to the exhaust. One exhaust could possibly be eliminated. This new wall would separate the autoclave trash that may get built up in front of the autoclaves from the animal corridor. The air in the animal corridor would be cleaner than the air in autoclave area: if trash spills than it does not get back down to animal corridor. I c: r" a one: people can re-gown and walk The fastest PGO can proceed with procurement is 6 weeks with an EA contractor. At least the whole month of April is needed for design. FPAA is not been approved. What are the hard solid requirements for 3 weeks? It is not acceptable to piece meal the project. Time frame cannot be established until a contractor is on board. Fan failure test is still a big issue since test can?t begin until the the fan problem won?t be determined until that point. The direction - gave BFO was that no fan failure test would be allowed while the programs are still in operation the test will have to wait until programs more out. OHS reconsidered this and will now allow shut down before the programs more out as long as animals are in primary containment. It can be done either on the weekend or early morning. The programs and ARB (people) will have to stayr out of there until the test is done. Approximate time of test for fan failure is four hours; the test can be done in sting, as long it is scheduled in advance. . is to relay the results of this meeting to the programs and ARE. Bill Howard is to check autoclaves and inspect fer bioseals. ARE requested that the fan failure be done during normal business hours so that the attending vet can monitor the animals. The vet?s go in twice per day, once is- early in the morning at 6:00 am. and that would be the ideal time to perform test. Test and Balance personnel would on the roof at- the fan and not in the lab space. Test should be performed as early as possible because as time goes on the ambient temperature will rise. Dr. Black questioned what the problems were with the exhaust fans and BFO explained that currently the exhaust fans are not operating with redundancy. One fan alone can?t maintain system static pressure thus if one fan fails the 1riwariunt will become positive. Before the fan failure test BFO needs to know from ARE how much time is needed for morning change out. ARE to send to IE or this issue can be addressed in the next HOG meeting. ARB to send information ASAP. Mathe, Chester From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 2:34 PM To: Tyler, John Lingler, Arthur R. Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Nogueira, William P. Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: BFO Meeting Minutes - 13-18-201 0 All, Attached are the minutes from our meeting please let me know if you have any additions or corrections. tier as Pantiequ . 262m.- HUAC Mod. I liars: 4: U5 2 5; Karen Moss F. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 404-825-6532? Fax: email: KMossl?r?cdogov ?@294 HEALTHLEH PEOPLE- stunt; 9" J.- 1? "than '94- .E e! To 3 ?3 MEETING MINUTES Center for Disease Control and Prevention Date: March 18, 2010 Subject: P2009453 Building vac Modi?cation i Location: Building Room ?342 Attendees: Karen Moss DEMO John Tyler - DEMO Art Lingler CIMO Ken Walpole FMEO Paul Nogueira FMEO Christina Ford FMEO Paul Probst FMEO Discussion: I Risk Assessment is needed by OHS. Once Risk Assessment is done programs can start to write while BFO is designing the project. I Julyr construction start date is an issue; design should be done by next week in order to accomplish that goal. FPAA takes 30 days minimum. Karen will check possibilities with Lenore Mickie. I Three week shutdown is problematic. Gas tight dampers have a long lead time of 12 weeks. I According to Art Linger Procurement Process: Pricing 30 days 1 week negotiation and award 1 week for bond 2 week for Submission I. Fan Failure test is an issue since we won?t know what parts to order until we are already in shut down mode. I Phoenix valves are constant volume maximum minimum stop via sofnvare. I Reheat control valves will need to be from JCI. I A commissioning firm will need to he hired to do exhaust fan failure. I Add to JCI scope extra man hours for unknowns. I According to Paul Probst? OHS decontamination will take 3 days. I Ping pong hall removal and doors sweeps will be done by contractor and not by Four Seasons. OHS does not typically run smoke test with doors open. BFO will set up a meeting with OHS. OHS in training until March 29m. Maths, Chester (cosiocoorosEP) From: Chandler. George Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:15 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule - 1X08 CDC 82 KB Let's fully discuss this at today?s 1?on-1 so we can put this issue to rest. I thoughtwe had it worked out before and the Program may be raising a ?new? issue here. My question is what is the driver on the timing issue? If it interferes with well that is not ramping down as far as I know and the work is going to be disruptive at any point. As far as i know there are no DSAT issues driving any of Thanks! G.- (CDCIOIDINCZVED) Sent: 2010 1:55 PM To: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOXBFD) Cc: Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOID OD Probst Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery (cocxocooysFO); (cocrocoozousp Howard, William (Bill) (cociocooioHS); Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule George, was In a HOG meeting held earlier today, presented a preliminary schedule for the Buildin??i?? ivarium air reversal project Membersof the HOG view the timing of the projeCt tops-completely unacceptable, and is nowhere close to-the tirrieframe in aMaroh amt-zine tg_P_au_l (in which the H99 and OHS requestedthat the In a meeting held on March 22, Ken Bowen offered up some solutions that could expedite the process, but evidently they were not incorporated into the planning. if the proposed schedule is followed, the Vivarium would be shutdown at an inopportune time for the programs utilizing the spaceDivision and that could prove to be very disruptive. I believe that there are solutions to this problem, and that the project can be expedited if all options are considered. HOG members are available to meet with you to discuss the situation if you so choose. . FITT 1?280 LIE II. 252.341! "lathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday. April 22, 2010 2:06 PM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Fw: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule - CDC 81 KB Attachments: placeholder.tmp Heads up. . - - (CDCrOIo/chveo) To: Chandler, George Cc: Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOID OD Probst Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIDCOOIBFO): (cocrocooxol-lS); Howard, (Bill) (cocrocooronsp Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thu Apr 22 13:55:00 2010 Subject: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule George, In a HOG meeting held earlier today, Paul Probst presented a preliminary schedule for the Building D'ivar'ium atria?? reversal project see attachment). Members of the HOG view the timing of the project to be completely unacceptable, and is nowhere close to the timeframe that was indicated in a March 8 memo to Paul {in which the HOG and OHS requested that the project move attached). in a meeting held on March 22, Ken Bowen offered up some solutions that could expedite'the process, but evidently they were not incorporated into the planning. If the proposed schedule is followed, the Vivarium would be shut down at an inopportune time for the programs space Division and TB) that could prove to be very disruptive. I believe that there are solutions to this problem, and that the project can be expedited if all options are considered. HOG members are available to meet with you to discuss the situation if you so choose. 2673011 Procurement and Construction Schedulexrsx?aa 42 C. E) BEBE-tilt) :12 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler. George Sent: Monday. April 26, 2010 10:15 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule - IXOS CDC 82 KB Let?s fully discuss this at today's 1-on-1 so we can put this issue to rest. I thought we had it worked out before - and the Program may be raising a ?new? issue here. My question is what is the driver on the timing issue? If it interferes with well that is not ramping down as far as I know and the work is going to be disruptive at any point. As far as I know there are no DSAT issues driving any Thanks! 3. From: lbil'3'l'42 ?2623Ihi Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:55 PM To: Chandier, George Cc: Nicholson, Janet OD Probst Paul E. Bowen, Ken 1.. WiIliams, Jeffery (coqocoolousy Howard, William (Bill) Walpole, Kenneth K. {CDC/occaorsFo) Subject: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule George, Laws 4205: In a HOG meeting held earlier today, Paul Probst presented a preliminary schedule fq??e?uildinQJliyarium air'tE-aam revers?_prpject see attachment]. Members of the HOG view the timing of the project to unacceptable, and close to the timeframe "that was indicated in ah'iyjlarch? memgtg Paulim which the HOG and. QHS Leeusstedthatthe In a meeting held on March 22, Ken Bowen offered up some solutions that could expedite the process. but evidently they were not incorporated into the planning. If the chedule is followed. the Vivarium would be shut down at an inopportune time for the programs utilizing the i . ivision and TB) that could prove to be very disruptive. I believe that there are solutions to this problem. and that the project can be expedited if all options are considered. HOG members are available to meet with you to ss the situation if you so choose. I 'll3' 1' iviathe, Chester (cocrocoorosem From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 3:59 AM To: Subject: VAC Modifications Ken. . I checked with Tom and others who received it and it open okay for them, sol am not sure why yours was offset. Here is i a pot of the power point. Best Regards, l4. P2009453 OHS airflow BFO Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: amazes-sea? Fax: rte-assess? email: KMossl @cdtgov From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Friday; April 02, 2010 8:35 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIDCDD BFO Subject: RE: P2009453 W3 WEE 52mm VAC Modi?cations Yep. with the attachment. Everything was offset so it was hard to follow. Thanks. Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 40443393303 Office 404-639-0499 Fax From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:40 AM 1. To: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: P2009453 U-S-C- HVAC Modi?cations With the power point? Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1800 Clifton Road E. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 - -i l- - . email From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 7:23 AM To: Moss, Karen Subject: RE: P2009453 {gig}? U-S-C- HVAC Modi?cations Something happen to the attachment Looks like the graphics shifted It?s hard to tell With graphics what the changes are. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404-539-3303 Office 404-639-0499 Fax From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:26 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mikei Black, Carolyn Kellar, Kath Kathi Walpole, K. (cociocooisFO); Howard, William (Bill) i Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Arthur R. Tanya A. 0.3.0. 262a Subject: RE: P2009453 HVAC Modi?cations Ladies and Gentlemen. d? Hnade a few more revision to clarify based on meeting Regards. File: vivariun'i air flow-billhoward-revBFO.ppt as Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Nil-438330? Cell: 404-825-632? Fax: email: Khiossl?oj.cdc.mv From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:52 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. lWilliams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carcian Kellar, Kath Kathi Walole Kenneth (cocrocoogsso); Howard, William (Bill) (sociocooiOHs); (coclocooxonsh Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. (CDCIOCDDIBFD) Subject: P2009453 i? U-S-C- it anc Modi?cations Ladies and Gentlemen, Attached are the minutes of our 3_22_20?l 0 meeting. Please advise should you have any additions or corrections. Attached is the OHS airflow diagram that I have revised to show the new wall location. Also, I have modified the existing directional air flow for the decon area based on existing drawings and the baseline test and balance that was done. The decon area is neutral to the dirty corridor; OHS to direct it this is to be maintain as neutral or changed as positive to the autoclave area as the future air?ow arrows now indicate. Best Regards, File: vivarium air flow-billhoward-revBFO.ppt File: P2009453 3H22H2010.pdf>> VAC Mod. SSH Meeting Minutes Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: fro?oss-ssor Coll: 4o4-szs-ssar Fan-i: Witt-438265? email: Hussite-1m Page 1108 {b){3)r42 use. 252mm Etna; "Chester (coolocoorOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 2010 9:34 AM To: Black, Carolyn Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams. Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Keller, (Kathi) Wat tile Kenneth K. (CDCJOCOOJBF William (Bill) tcocrocooroSHE); an. (coerciolncezlc); Bowen, Ken L. (encrocoorsFoi l?jiEt, :12 US Cl 3; 252301: Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. Subject: RE: P2009453 it'll?? U-S-C- VAC Modifications Dr. Black, The de-con room is not the green area outlined but the room opposite the shower anteroom (green area}; the room is labeled but the print is small. The green area outside the showers referred to as the shower anteroom will be positive to Regards. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: trance-830? Cell: 404?525-682? ax: email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Black, Carolyn Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 1:33 PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Kellar, Kath Kathi W. Howard, William (Bill) ma Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. (CDCKOCOOIBFD) Subject: RE: P2009453 {bli3li42 USC- HVAC Modi?cations 262ath] Inuit-'12 Ll SC. ?2E2alh: Thank you, Karen, this looks good. The only clari?cation issue thatl have is the term "decon area" that you used. Are you referring to the area outlined in green. just 'outside? the shower area? This area should be remain) positive to the dirty corridorfautoclave area as indicated on the drawing. Please confirm that this will be the case. When the changes have been made. donning and dotting protocols can be modified, as necessary, to adapt to the new air-flow patterns. Thanks again for your helpful revisions. Carolyn Black From: Moss, Karen 3, Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:26 PM 1, To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Kellar, Kath Kathi . - K. Howard, William (Bill) ibit31r42U-S-C-?262aihi Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Ungler, Arthur R. Tanya A. Subject: RE: P2009453 M81142 U.S.C.?262aihl HVAC Modi?cations Ladies and Gentlemen. I made a few more revision to clarify based on meeting discussions. Regards. File: Vivarium air 3) Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Desrgn Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta Georgia 30333 . -. ..-.. - alt-HI! From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:52 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Kellar, Kath Kathi . - -a K. (cocrocooxaro); Howard, William (Bill) mfg; Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 (bli3li42 use. ?2e2arm HVAC Modi?cations Ladies and Gentlemen. Attached are the minutes of our 3_22_2010 meeting. Please advise should you have any additions or corrections Attached is the OHS air?ow diagram that have revised to show the new wall location. Also, i have modified the existing directional air flow for the decon area based on existing drawings and the baseline test and balance that was done. The decon area is neutral to the testi?es-0E I OHS to direct if this is to be maintain as neutral or changed as positive to the autoclave area as the future at ow arrows now indicate. Best Regards. File: vivarium air flow-oillhoward-revBFOppt File: P2009453 VAC Mod {Jam Meeting Minutes 3_22_2010.pdf SC Karenl?rfass P.E. Mechanical Engineer C?bntrac?ng Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Call: 4G4-325-6827 Fax: no.4 33-255? email: KMossl ragga; Mathe, Chester (cocrocomosem From: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Thursday. May 20. 2010 4:50 PM To: Raymond. George Blanchard. Thomas M. Daniels. Charles E. Walpole. Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen. Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFOZ: Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The intent is to give a preliminary IGE to P60 to give them an order of magnitude of the cost of the project. I would prefer to err a little on the high side rather than the low. Thanks for your input George, I will use your number of $20,000 for any controls cost (which I assume include cost. installation and programming} associated with 2 VFD's. Final 165 will be presented upon ?nal design documents. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-488-3307 Cell: 404-825-5327 Fax: 7?0-438?2667 email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday. May 20. 2010 3:50 PM To: Blanchard. Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. M055, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Prohst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 think-things are getting lost in Email Translation. The email that Karen sent to Ken had nothing to do with my email below. My email below is only a follow-up to the agreements and action items following our meeting on yesterday. In reference to the email that Karen forwarded on to Ken from Lenore Mickie. P60 only requested a "ballpark figure? and a "price range" for the overall for this project. If you are adding in the price for the VFD's for "worst case", you can use the following: VFD's $10,000 (2 at 5K each) Electrical $20,000 Controls $20,000 Total for VFD Add is between Ball park. However, as stated below, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope of this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. For that matter, you cannot attempted to come-up with and IGE until you have an agreed upon scope and preliminary design. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1500 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 4046393335 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Messagem? From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost and/'or misunderstood in the e-mail translation. i think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGO with a detailed IGE up?front. Lenore Mickie requested the IGE in an e-rnail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something I'm sure that we all want. She wasn?t trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, and we will re-visit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst-case estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an email (as is often my problem). Anyway, i believe she needs someone's 0K in FM E0 to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the email at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Fid. NE, Mail Stop K-96 Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 270488-3105 Cell: 404-444-5281 e-mail: TBlanchard@cdc.gov "?v?Original From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. 2 Subject: VED and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the ivFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount ofexhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the final design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FMED's position is are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404-639-1635 Email: ghr5@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, April 2010 1:55 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) WW SE 5 Subject: FW: to fans Assistance. I I - Karen: Here is info requested. VFD may not be a good idea if have to replace motors. I'm not sure what the motors weigh, but it could be tricky from a labor standpoint as well. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Tuesday, April 2010 1:10 PM To: Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFOM - al?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) 26am: Subject: P2009453-Add- ,Electrical Assistance Paul, The motors for are identical. Baldcr Manufacturer CAT NO. Spec?- 10F315X 5901 H2 HP 50 Voltage - 2301460 Amps - 120160 RPM's -1?60 Frame - 326T Frequency - 60 H2 Phase - 3 SCR. F. - 1.15 William Paul Nogueira Building 15113 Coordinator ODIOCOOIBFOIFMEO CDC Roybal Campus 1600 Clifton Road MS (F04) Atlanta. GA 30333 {404) 639-1679 Of?ce {678) 616-4695 Cell From: MassIr Karen Sent: Thursday,r April 22, 2010 10:10 AM To: Phillips, Roman (CTR Nogueira, William P. (CDCIDCDOIBFD) 'gu??giaf??bjegt: FW: to Electrical Assistance 1 Can you send me the nameplate data of the existing motors for fans 'Dt-ii? 92525? these are the exhaust fans for the Vivarium. Karen Moss F.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 'l'il'0-488-830T Fax: em ail: KMossi @cdo gov From: Goociin, John Sent: Thursday.r April 22Ir 2010 10:03 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIDCDOIBFO) I Subject: RE: P2009453 Add to fan at? Electrical Assistance Karen I will ask MK Plastics if theyr still have this information. It may be better to have one ofthe maintenance men read the nameplate of the existing motors. This tear; you would be sure of what is there currently. Thanks John W. Goodin Atlanta Branch Manager Torn Barrow Company P: 404-605-366? F: 404-350-9121 c: jgoodin@tombarrow.corn From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:32 AM To: Goodinr John Subject: RE: P2009453 Add VFD's to fan Electrical Assistance John, I need the frame size of the existing motor to get a motor selection. Thanks1 Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Kr97 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: ??0?483?8307 Cell: 404-525-5327 Fax: 7?0?453-2657' email: From: Goodin, John Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:49 AM To: Moss, Karen Co: Riley, Steve l_ Subject: RE: P2009453 Add to fanElec?trioal Assistance Karen Yes you will, assuming the existing motors are the original ones. I would suggest that you get the motor with an Aegis shaft grounding ring installed. Any VFD will impart some shaft current into the motor bearings, which eventually will cause the hearings to fail. The motor manufacturer?s do not warrant their motors against this type of failure, even if the motor is "inverter Duty?. The rings are inexpensive, about 200 per motor installed. Typically, they have to be installed at a motor shop as the motor casing has to be drilled and tapped. The rings provide a ground source for the shaft current to dissipate through, otherwise, the current dissipates through the motor bearings. You can find more information on Aegis rings at We do not sell them. lwould suggest you ask the motor shop you get your motors from about putting them on. One local source for a TEFC inverter rated motor and ring would be McCullough Electric, 404?633?5251. John W. Goodin Atlanta Branch Manager Tom Barrow Company P: 404?605?866? F: 404-350-9121 c: jgoodin@tombarrow.com From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOXBFD) Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:29 AM To: Goo-din, John lgjtiley, Steve 2523"" Subject: P2009453 Add 'VFD's'to'tans l:lElectrioal Assistance See below, do we need to replace the existing fan motors if we go this route? Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contrasting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1800 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-6827 Fax: email: KMOSSi@cdc.gov From: Riley, Steve (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 8:05 AM Moss, Karen 2523'?? Add was to fans" Electrical Assistance Karen, Are these motors inverter type? if they are not we may want to replace the existing motors. Thanks, Steve From: Moss, Karen (CDCICCOCIBFO) Sent: Friday, April 15, 2010 3:40 AM mi 42195; Biley, Steve (CDCJOCO DIET-O) 3533'?- Electrical Assistance HVAC Mod ??Ss??afn?i' Steve. I uses We want to add VFD's to exhaust fans These fans are located on the roof of need-electrons? assistance and cost. The DOE is located in the above folder. Thanks, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 oecs: 710?433-3307 Cell: 404-325-5327 Fax: Hesse-ass? email: KM 055 @cdc.gov Mathe. Chester From: Sent To: Go: Subject: Paul, Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Tuesday, April 27, 2010 1:10 PM Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBF FW: P2009453 Add VFD's to fans ?lff?. The motors for use. 0 252aihi are identical. Baldor Manufacturer CAT ND. M411 Spec 10F315X 6901 H2 5T-12 Voltage - 2301460 Amps RPM's wtilt-30 Frame - 326T Frequency 50 Phase - 3 SCR. F. - 1.15 a 12050 HZ William Paul Nogueira Building 151'18 Coordinator ODIOCOOIBFOIFMEO CDC Roybal Campus 1600 Clifton Road MS (F04) Atlanta, GA 30333 (454) 539-1579 5154595 Of?ce Cell Belfield, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ (CTRL Electrical "252a-h From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:10 AM I lei-[3142 Can you send me the nameplate data of the existing motors for fans Vivarium. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 05155: 770-433-330? Cell: 404-325-5327 Fax: Nil-4802567 email: KMosslr?icdcgov T153: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) ogueira, William P. . 2525th subjects. Add woe to-fa ns Electrical Assistance use. . these are the exhaust fans for the From: Goodin, John [mailtotJGoodin@tombarrow.com] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:03 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCDOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Add VFD's to fans Electrical Assistance lawsuits us I: :3 Karen lwili ask MK Plastics if they still have this information. It may be better to have one of the maintenance men read the nameplate of the existing motors. This way you would be sure of what is there currently. Thanks John W. Goodin Atlanta Branch Manager Tom Barrow Company P: 404-605-8567 F: 404?350?9121 miiE jgoodin@tombarrow.com From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:32 AM To: Goodin, John Subject: RE: P2009453 Add to fans Electrical Assistance John, - . my need the frame size of the existing motor to get a motor selection. Thanks, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-97 Atlanta1 Georgia 30333 Office: rr0-4aa-3307 Cell: 404.325-552? Fax: r70-4aa-zaar email: KMossl @cdc.gov From: Goodin, John Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:49 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Riley, Steve Subject: RE: P2009453 Add VFD's to fans -. Electrical Assistance Karen 25250.0} Yes you will, assuming the existing motors are the original ones. I would suggest that you get: the motor with an Aegis shaft grounding ring installed. Any VFU will impart some shaft current into the motor bearings, which eventually will cause the hearings to fail. The motor ma nufacturer?s do not warrant their motors against this type of failure, even if the motor is "Inverter Duty?. The rings are inexpensive, about 5 200 per motor installed. Typically, they have to be installed at a motor shop as the motor casing has to be drilled and tapped. The rings provide a ground source for the shaft current to dissipate through, otherwise, the current dissipates through the motor bearings. You can find more information on Aegis rings at We do not sell them. I would suggest you ask the motor shop you get your motors from about putting them on. One local source for a TEFC inverter rated motor and ring would be McCullough Electric, 404-688-5251. lohn W. Goodin Atlanta Branch Manager Tom Barrow Company P: 4046098567 F: 404-350-9121 c: jgoodin @tombarrow.com From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:29 AM To: Goodin, John ?ll-(Bid: ?lley, Steve 5533"? Subject:- FW: P2009453?Add"?fFD"s to EIECtriCal See below, do we need to replace the existing fan motors ifwe go this route? Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770488?830? Cell: 41314-325682? Fax: email: KMossl @cdcgov From: Riley, Steve Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 8:05 AM Lassie-Ira: Moss, Karen ?52? Subjectr'REi' P2909453 to fans Electrical Assistance Karen, Are these motors inverter type? If they are not we may want to replace the existing motors. 3 Than ks. Steve From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, April 15, 2-310 3:40 AM Bilelv'r Steve tofans Electrical Assistance IbilS. :12 U3 C1. ?3 Meal: Steve. ., 31343.42 We want to add to exhaust fans FA These fans are located on the roof of need electr-Ieala'hi- assistance and cost The DCE is located in the above folder. Thanks, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404~325-5327 Fax: WEI-4334667 email: KMess Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 AM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: FW: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule FYI Thanks. Paul 404-639-0505 From: Chandler, George 2, 2010 4:52 PM CDC/ciomczveo) Cc: Nicholson, Janet Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery (compose/Bro); Howard, William (Bill) (coolness/OHS); Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule Inil'3 42 U5 5462301: will discuss with and the Team to see what the issues are and alternatives. We have met extensively within to consider all Will follow up with you very soon. G.- Frnm: I'bil3l112 LI 202mb:- To: Chandler, George Cc: Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDIOD Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery (operated/arc); (cocrocoomHS); Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocooroHS); Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Thu Apr 22 13:55:00 2010 Subject: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule George, llama-:42 Li Ci? In a HOG meeting held earlier today. Paul Probst presented a preliminary schedule for the Building reversal project see attachment). Members of the HOG view the timing of the project to be completely unacceptable, and is nowhere close to the timeframe that was indicated in a March 8 memo to Paul (in which the HOG and OHS requested that the project move attached). In a meeting held on March 22, Ken Bowen offered up some solutions that could expedite the process, but evidently they were not incorporated into the planning. If the proposed schedule is followed, the Vivarium would be shut down at an inopportune time for the programs utilizing the space i =72; Division and that could prove to be very disruptive. I believe that there are solutions to this problem. and that the project can be expedited if all options are considered. HOG members are available to meet with you to discuss the situation if you so choose. Procurement and Construction eduie.xisx>> l1? 2525II1 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Proust. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 7:02 AM To: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Attachments: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedulexlsx Thanks, Paul 404?639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOKBFO). Sent: Monday, April 19. 2010 2:19 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Paul, Attached is preliminary procurement and construction schedule. Schedule is based on input from Willis Mechanical and P60. Call if you have questions. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Keg? Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: i'i'0?433?530? Cell: 404-325-5532? Fax: noses-255? em ail: Mos: sl [origin gov Task Name Issue to P60 Construction Procurement Award Contract- SafetVISecuritvfMobilizatien Shop Drawing Submittais Equipment Release Lab Shut Down Date OHS Decon Mechanical Test and Blance OHS Smoke Test Walk Through Punch List Lab Fla-opens Duration 1 day 23 days 15 days 15 days 30 days 40 days 1 day 3 days 22 days 5 days 5 daya 5 days 1 day Start Mon 8f 16! 10 Mon 3/16/10 Thu 9,3163?10 Wed 1016/10 Wed 10(6/10 Wed 11(171?10 Men 1117(11 Mon 1/17/11 Thu Mon 2/21111 Mon 2/28/11 Mun 2f28fll Men 3/7f11 Finish Men Sll?fl? Wed 91?153?10 Wed 1015;10 Tue 101?26/10 Tue 11f16f10 Tue Mil/11 Men 1f1?f11 Wed 1f19f11 Fri 2118/11 Fri 2f25/11 Fri 3/4f11 Fri 3f4f11 Mon Mathe, Chester From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:21 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFW Subject: FW: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule - 1X08 CDC 81 KB FYI Thanks, Paul 404-539-0505 From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:19 AM To: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule Art: Left you a couple of voice mail messages. Would like to get together to talk about methods to reduce shutdown time pro-install to point of connection, government furnish bio-seal dampers, etc}. Please call at earliest convenience. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Sent: urs ay, 2010 1:55 PM To: Chandler, George Cc: Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDIOD Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery (coclococxsFO); (coulomb/0H5); Howard, William (Bill) (cot/ocooioHS); Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCDDIBFO) Subject: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule loila 4205': In a HOG meeting held earlier today. Paul Probst presented a preliminary schedule for the Building DJWarium air-3523?! reversal project see attachment). Members of the HOG view the timing of the project to be completer unacceptable, and is nowhere close to the timeframe that was indicated in a March 8 memo to Paul (in which the HOG and?OHS requested that the project move attached). in a meeting held on March 22, Ken Bowen offered up some solutions that could expedite the process, but evidently they were not incorporated into the planning. If the I Jle is followed, the Vivarium would be shutdown at an inopportune time for the programs utilizing the spa (?32335503. Division and TB) that could prove to be very disruptive. I believe that there are solutions to this problem, and that the project can be eXpedited if all options are considered. HOG members are available to meet with you to 11,3123? the situation if you so choose. 'JE'J'm'hi I. ATT 29283 Mill-Hi2 E- I: 252.341} Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, April'23, 2010 11:19 AM To: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule - IXOS CDC 81 KB Art; Left you a couple of voice mail messages. Would like to get'together to talk about methods to reduce shutdown time pre-install to point of connection, government furnish bio-seal dampers. etc). Please call at earliest convenience. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: ?2I323rh1 Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:55 PM To: Chandler, George (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Cc: Nicholson, Janet Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Howard, William (Bill) Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: Vivarium project P2000453 schedule George. rolls-:42 0.5 In a HOG meeting held earlier today, Paul Probst presented a preliminary schedule for the Building DViv'arium air-252W reversal project see attachment}. Members of the HOG view the timing of the project to be completely unacceptable, and is nowhere close to the timeframe that was indicated in a March 8 memo to Paul {in which the HOG and OHS requested that the project move forward.,.also attached]- In a meeting held on Marsh 22, Ken Bowen offered up some solutions that could expedite the process, but evidently they were not incorporated into the planning. If the proposed schedule is followed, the Vivarium would be shut down at an inopportune time for the programs utilizing the spec use 42 use Division and TB) that could prove to be very disruptive. I believe that there aresolutions to this problem, and that the project can be expedited if all options are considered. HOG members are available to meetwith you to discuss the situation if you so choose. use El 3C. 53252301- Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Friday, April 23, 2 1010259 AM To: Barrett, Timothy J. 3 [3 .3 252 Damon Inger K. (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Howard, William (Bill) (coolocoolloSHE - (coerciomcezlo) {slam use. -- (coolocoolosspl; {b 3 Mus-Cs Probst Paul E. 1-42 ?vs-Ct Valle, Bessie M. CTR ?his sole, Kenneth Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDINCIRD) Subject: FW: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test (bll3ii42 ?1 the tan failure test date and time. Let me know if this works. Win 0 202mm From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:17 PM . To: Moss, Karen Probst, Paul E. Walole Kenneth K. (coalesce/0H5); Williams, Allison (CDC om - Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Nogueira, William P. Ford, Maria Cristina Powell, Nathaniel - . . - (bll3iz42 Subject. RE. P2009453 Fan Failure Test 252th The date for this test has been changed to May 10?1 at 10:00 am. just want to clarify because the question has been asked; according to Steve Koob when one fan fails the vivarium will go positive instead of negative; air will flow out of the lab instead of into. Can OHS direct if we need to take any other precautions? As I understand the animals will be in hepa filtered cages or biobubbles. Thanks, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: 770-488-2657 email: KMossl@cdc.gdv From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:01 PM . To: Probst, Paul E. Walole, Kenneth K. lap? Williams, Allison (coo/ciomcpocso); Cc: Howard, William (Bill) 12'; .- Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Nogueira, William P. Ford, Maria Cristina Powell, Nathaniel Subject: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test U-S-C- Ladies and Gentlemen, I have the above referenced fan failure test scheduled for May 7 at 9 Required to be present at this testare Ken Walpole and his controls technician, Allison Williams - Dave Welch (TAB Services), and myself. 3mm . The test will include the following: 1. Manually fail fanl?l at the starter on the roof. 2. Observation of results physically and via controls at the roof andi'or penthouse. 3. TAB Services to measure 8: record duct air flow and static pressure; damper position; damper pressure drop damper air flow leakage; fan amperage and other data as deemed necessary. All measurements will be taken on the roof. 4. Start Fan 5. Manually fail Fan and repeat the above process. 6. Visual of ping pong ball reaction at the ?oor during the test and results recorded. Ken Walpole, John Goodin, David Welsh and myself will be on the roof at the fans performing the test. to provide visual of ping pong bail reaction and assist as neededanimal assistance if .3. The testis exected to take approximatel ?4 hours. No me will be allowed on the Vivarium'area excep Allison Williams and Mi Call me if you have questions. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Nil-4836307 Cell: elm-5254332? Far: 770433-255? email: KMosslr?lcdc. m; 4 USE Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 9:55 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDGIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Nogueira. William P. (CDCIOCO I Subject: FW: P2009453 Add VFD's to fan ?2112 Electrical Assistance Paul and Ken, The current motors are not inverter duty so they will have to be changed out if we decide on VFD. I need the name plate data on the motor to cost replacement of motor. If you can get someone to get this for me itwould save me a trip down there. Thanks. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 D?ice: noses-asp? Cell: 404-3254333- Fax: Tito?48043657 email: KMossl Glade From: Goodin, John Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:03 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ renal; Subject: RE: P2009453 Add VFD's to fan: 26231;, Electrical Assistance I: I1 Karen I will ask MK Plastics if they still have this information. It may,?r be better to have one of the maintenance men read the nameplate of the existing motors. This way you would be sure of what is there currently. Thanks John W. Goodin Atlanta Branch Manager Tom Barrow Company P: 404-605 -866? F: 404-350-9121 C: ieoodin @tom_barrow.com From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:32 AM To: Goodin, John m, Subject: RE: P2009453 Add VFD's to fans Electrical Assistance Ilcii" John, i need the frame size of the existing motor to get a motor selection. Thanks, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgla 30333 Of?ce: noses-sac? Cell: 404-325-5527 Fax: email: Kl?lossl dogov From: Goodin, John Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:49 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Riley, Steve (CDCIOCODIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Add VFD's to fans Electrical Assistance Karen Yes you will, assuming the existing motors are the original ones. I would suggest that you get the motor with an Aegis shaft grounding ring installed. Any VFD will impart some shaft current into the motor bearings, which eventually will cause the hearings to fail. The motor manufacturer?s do not warrant their motors against this type of failure, even if the motor is ?Inverter Duty?. The rings are inexpensive, about 200 per motor installed. Typically, they have to be installed at a motor shop as the motor casing has to be drilled and tapped. The rings provide a ground source for the shaft current to dissipate through, otherwise, the current dissipates through the motor bearings. You can ?nd more information on Aegis rings at We do notsell them. I would suggest you ask the motor shop you get your motors from about putting them on. One local source for a TEFC inverter rated motor and ring would be McCullough Electric, 404-638-5251. John W. Goodin Atlanta Branch Manager Tom Barrow Company P: 404?605?8667 F: .I I .l I I. ?Jim! igoodithombarrowcom hMH?-iw? . .. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:29 AM To: Goodin, John Cc: Riley, Steve (CDCIDCODXBFO) I Subject: FW: P2009453 Add VFD's to lads Electrical Assistance See below, do we need to replace the existing fan motors, if we go this route? Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1000 Clifton Road ME. ME Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ??0-430-030? Cell; 404?525-5327 Fax: email: KMoss @dcgov From: Riley, Steve Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 8:05 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODIBFO) a, Subject: RE: P2009453 Add vsc's to fans Electrical Assistance Karen, Are these motors Inverter type? If they are not we may want to replace the existing motors. Thanks, Steve From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDDIBFO) Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 8:40 AM To: Riley, Steve Subject: P2009453 Add VFD's to fans Electrical Assistance USE: BFO HVAC Mod Steve. We want to add to exhaust fans These fans are located on the roof of I need electrical assistance and cost. The DCE is loose-u we sow folder, Thanks, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atianta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-6852? Fax: WEI-4884667 emaiE: ?it-531mg: g? Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: FridayI April 23, 2010 8:50 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Walpole, Kenneth Daniels, Charles E. (GDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule The programs don?t care when the shut down occurs; their only concern is the down time. Ken Bowen's ideas were not accepted by BFO at that March 22?" meeting. Tony was there and he knows that. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: trauma-sac? Cell: 4o4-szs-sszr Fax: email: Mo551@cdc_nov From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 4:01 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule FYI Than ks, Paul 404-839-0505 From: Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:55 PM To: Chandler, George Cc: Nicholson, Janet OD - Probst Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery . . Howard, William (Bill) (coclocooronsn Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule George, Vivarium air - - completely unacceptable, and is nowhere close to the timeframe that was indicated in a March 8 memo to Paul (in which the HOG- and OHS requested that the project move forward. ..also attached). in a meeting held on March 22, Ken Bowen offered 1 up some solutions that could expedite the process, but evidentty they were not incorporated into the planning. If the propos space ?le is followed. the Vivarium would be shut down at an inopportune time for the programs utilizing the Division and TB) that could prove to be very disruptive. I believe that there are solutions to this problem. and that the project can be expedited if all options are considered. HOG members are available to meet with you to m' the situation if you so choose. 262.3% File: P2009453 Procurement and Construction File: HOG_Memo_F1?vl E0 (2).docx Imam: use mils. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, George (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: ril 22 2010 4:52 PM To: (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Cc: Nicholson, Janet Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery was! Howard, William (Bill) Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule Ibil'?; - will discuss with and the Team to see what the issues are and alternatives. We have met extensively within BFO to consider all Will follow up with you very soon. G.- . To: Chandler, George CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Nicholson, Janet Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery (CDC/ocoogonsp Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocoorwsp Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCODKBFO) Sent: Thu Apr 22 13:55:00 2010 Subject: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule George, means uses In a HOG meeting held earlier today, Paul Probst presented a preliminary schedule for the BuildingDVivarium'air-2523'? reversal project see attachment). Members of the HOG view the timing of the project to be completely unacceptable, and is nowhere close to the timeframe thatwas indicated in a March 8 memo to Paul (in which the HOG and OHS requested that the project move forward attached). In a meeting held on March 22, Ken Bowen offered up some solutions that could expedite the process, but evidently they were not incorporated into the planning. Itthe proposed schedule is followed, the Vivarium would be shut down at an inopportune time for the programs utilizing the space $523 if Division and that could prove to be very disrUptive. I believe that there are solutions to this problem, and that the project can be expedited if all options are considered. HOG members are available to meet with you to discuss the situation if you so choose. Ilium Procurement and Construction Schedulexfsxea- --..- ILlit?- Mathe, Chester From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 4:01 PM To: Moss, Karen Subject: FW: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule CDC 80 KB FYI Thanks, Paul 404-839-0505 From: "3'42 5-6- Emir-i (CDCjOIochzveo) Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:55 PM To: Chandler, George Cc: Nicholson, Janet Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Howard, William (Bill) Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule George, mile :42 LIE In a HOG meeting held earlier today, Paul Probst presented a preliminary schedule for the Building lg/ivarium reversal project see attachment). Members of the HOG view the timing of the project to completely unacceptable, and is nowhere close to the timeframe that was indicated in a March 8 memo to Paul (in which the HOG and OHS requested that the project move also attached). In a meeting held on March 22, Ken Bowen offered up some solutions that could eXpedlte the process, but evidently they were not incorporated into the planning. if the proposu mama, Is is followed, the Vivarium would be shut down at an inopportune time for the programs utilizing the space . sisal-n:- ivision and TB) that could prove to be veiy disruptive. i believe that there are solutions to this problem. and that the project can be expedited if all options are considered. HOG members are available to meet with you to discuss the situation if you so choose. 19? I'bil? {#12 252mm Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Thursday. April 22, 2010 2:53 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Subject: Re: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule it needed to go to a higher level. Sent from my BlaokBerry Wreless Handheld From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIDCOOIBFD) To: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thu Apr 22 14:22:05 2010 Subject: FW: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule Uh oh! Your meeting didn?t go well. Ken I ibil'3l'42 3.0. Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:55 PM To: Chandler, George Cc: Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOID OD Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery .. Howard, William (Bill) Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule George, HS 113 USC In a HOG meeting held earlier today. Paul Probst presented a preliminary schedule for the BulldingD anriom-a-ir-thiazaum reversal project see attachment). Members of the HOG view the timing of the project to be completely unacceptable, and is nowhere close to the timeframe that was indicated in a March 8 memo to Paul (in which the HOG and OHS requested that the project move attached). In a meeting held on March 22. Ken Bowen offered up some solutions that could expedite the process. but evidently they were not incorporated into the planning. If the proposed schedule is followed. the Vivarium would be shut down at an inopportune time for the programs utilizing the discuss the situation if you so choose. Procurement and Construction Schedulexlsxee BEES-II: U373 Mathe, Chester (CDCIGCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday. April'22, 2010 2:22 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCDOIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule - IXOS CDC 80 KB Uh ohl Your meeting didn't go well. From level: 0.5-: 525: I Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:55 PM To: Chandler, George Cc: Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDIOD Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery (cocrocoo/BFO); (cocrocooxonsx Howard, William (Bill) Walpole, Kenneth K. (coclocoorBFO) Subject: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule :12 LIE George, . In a HOG meeting held earlier today, Paul Probst presented a preliminary schedule for the Building ivarium air 6A reversal project see attachment). Members of the HOG view the timing of the project to be completely ur?lacceptableI and is nowhere close to the timeframe that was indicated in a March 8 memo to Paul (in which the HOG and OHS requested that the project move attached). In a meeting held on March 22, Ken Bowen offered up some solutions thatcould expedite the process, but evidently they were not incorporated into the planning. If the proposed schedule is followed, the Vivarium would be shut down at an inopportune time for the programs utilizing the space Division and TB) that could prove to be very disruptive. believe that there are solutions to this problem, and that the project can be eXpedited ifall options are considered. HOG members are available to meet with you to discuss the situation if you so choose. Tony erreesla [Dill?1'- Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:55 PM To: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFDJ Co: Nicholson, Janet Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO Bowen, Ken L. (cocrocooreFO); Williams, Jeffery Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHEL Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule - IXOS CDC 80 KB George, In a HOG meeting held earlier today. Paul Probst presented a preliminary schedule for the BuildingEl Vivarium air-952ml? reversal project see attachment). Members of the HOG view the timing of the project to be completely unacceptable, and is nowhere close to the timeframe that was indicated in a March 8 memo to Paul (in which the HOG and OHS requested that the project move attached). In a meeting held on March 22. Ken Bowen offered up some solutions that could expedite the process, but evidently they were not incorporated into the planning. If the proposed schedule is followed, the Vivarium would be shut down at an inopportune time for the programs utilizing the space Division and that could prove to be very disruptive. i believe that there are solutions to this problem, and that the project can be expedited-if all options are considered. HOG members are available to meet with you to discuss the situation if you so choose. thrlE 3. 4-2 USE ?2623rni Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:41 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Karen: The schedule wasn?t exactly,' a big hit in the HOG. Two concerns: 1] duration of the shutdown is emphatic that it be as short as possible, and 2) the start date of the shutdown sounds like they want to have it done before winter. It was pointed out that one of the items carrying a long duration was procurement of the biouseai dampers Bill Howard indicated that six were available. The four on the existing HEPA units to be removed, plus two more on a HEPA unit at Ft. Collins. Not much was talked about concerning action ?just some sticker shock Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:19 PM To: Prob-st, Paul E. Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Paul, Attached is preliminary procurement and construction schedule. Schedule is based on input from Willis Mechanical and P60. Call if you have questions. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Ciifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: noses-sac? Cell: 404-325-532? Fax: email: KMossl ode. ov Maths, Chester (coorocoomsee) From: Bowen, Ken L. (ODOIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 7:46 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Well at least it?s improved. Looks like 6 weeks to do the job and work will start in the middle of season. That?s going to be a tuft pill to swallow. Ken From: Probst,r Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:44 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: FW: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Ken: FYI. This is a preliminary schedule that was provided this week. Originally, we were told last week at AMT that it would go to PGO on October 4. Now it is August 16. I am taking to HOG Thursday morning. Not sure what to expect. Paul From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:19 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Paul, Attached is preliminary procurement and construction schedule. Schedule is based on input from Willis Mechanical and P60. Call if you have questions. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce; cease-530? Cell: 404-525-682? Fax: rte-453.255? email: KMossl [diode gov Mathe, Chester (cocrocoorosep) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday. April 21, 2010 0:44 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Attachments: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule.xlsx Ken: FYI. This is a preliminary schedule that was provided this week. Originally. we were told last week at AMT that it would go to P80 on October 4. Now it is August 16. I am taking to HOG Thursday morning. Not sure what to expect. Paul From: Moss, Karen (CDQOCOOEFO) Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:19 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule PauL Attached is preliminary procurement and construction schedule. Schedule is based on input from Willis Mechanical and P60. Call if you have questions. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-632? Far-c email: Task Name Issue to P60 Construction Procurement Award Contract Safety/Security] Mobilization Shop Drawing Submittals Equipment Release Lab Shut Down Date OHS Decon Mechanical Test and Blance OHS Smoke Test Walk Through Punch List La'o Re-opens Duration 1 day 23 days 15 days 15 days 30 days 40 days 1 day 3 days 22 days 5 days 5 days 5 days 1 day Start Mon 8! 16/10 Mon 81'16/10 Thu 9/15/10 Wed 10%! 10 Wed 10/6! 10 Wed 11f17f10 Mon 1/11111 Mon Thu Mon 2/21/11 Mon mam Mon 2128/11 Mon Mon 8/16/10 Wecl 9/15} 10 Wed ill/6,310 Tue 10(26/10 Tue llfl?fl?l Tue 11;l 11 Mon 1/17/11 Wed Fri 2/18fll Fri 2f25f11 Fri 31'41'11 Fri 3mm Mon 3/7/11 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Wednesday, April 21. 2010 3:16 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFCI) Subject: RE: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule It appears to be about "?091: complete From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 3:12 PM To: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Subject: Re: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDCIOCOOJBFO) To: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wed Apr 21 14:46:34 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule My Only What are you doing betWeen now and August 16? From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:42 PM To: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDCJUCOUIBFO) Subject: Fw: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Mike: I am going to call you to discuss. It is discrete. Sent from my BIackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Moss, Karen To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Mon Apr 19 14:18:51 2010 . Subject: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Paul, Attached is preliminary procurement and construction schedule. Schedule is based on input from Willis Mechanical and P60. Call ifyou have questions. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 3:12 PM To: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) To: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wed Apr 21 14:46:34 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule My Only What are you doing between now and August 16? From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:42 PM To: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Subject: Fw: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Mike: lam going to call you to discuss. It is discrete. Paul Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Moss, Karen To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Mon Apr 19 14:18:51 2010 Subject: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Paul, Attached is preliminary procurement and construction schedule. Schedule is based on input from Willis Mechanical and P60. Call if 1you have questions. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell; 404825?582? Fax: email: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Campbell. John Michael (Mike) (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:4? PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCICCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule My Only What are you doing between now and August 16? From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:42 PM To: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Subject: Fw: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Mike: 1 am going to call you to discuss. It is discrete. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFC) To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOJBFO) Cc: Walpole, Kenneth Sent: Mon Apr 19 14:18:51 2010 Subject: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Paul, Attached is preliminary procurement and construction schedule. Schedule is based on input from Willis Mechanical and P60. Call if you have questions. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-025-632? Fax: 770-453-2551 email: KMossi @cdc. gov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (GDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday. April 21, 2010 2:42 PM To: Campbell, John Michael (Mike) (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: Fw; P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Attachments: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedulexlsx Mike: I am going to call you to discuss. It is discrete. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Moss, Karen To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Mon Apr 19 14:18:51 2010 Subject: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Paul, Attached is preliminary procurement and construction schedule. Schedule is based on input from Willis Mechanical and PEG. Call if you have questions. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 7?0-400?330? Cell: 404-025-0821? Fax: email: KMosslfaagdg g9: Task Name Issue to P00 Construction Procurement Award Contract Shop Drawing Submittals Equipment Release Lab Shut Down Date 0H5 Decon Mechanical Test and Biance OHS Smoke Test Walk Through Punch List Lab Re-opens Duration 1 dag.l 23 days 15 days 15 days 30 days 40 days 1 day 3 days 22 days 5 days 5 days 5 days 1 day Start Mon 3/15/10 Mon 3/15/10 Thu 9/16/10 Wed 10/5/10 Wed 10/6/10 Wed 11/ 17/10 Mon 1/17/11 Mon 11 Thu 1/20/11 Mon 2/21/11 Mon 2/28/11 Mon 2/28/11 Mon 3/2/11 ?noh Mon 8/16/ 10 Wed 9/15/ 10 Wed 10/6/10 Tue 10/26/ 10 Tue 11/16/ 10 Tue 1/ 11/ 11 Mon 1/17/11 Wed 1/19/11 Fri 2/ 18/11 Fri 2/25/11 Fri 3/4/ 11 Fri 3/4/11 Mon 3/2/11 Mathe, Chester (cocrocooroserl) From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Wednesday, April 21. 2010 1:41 PM To: Probst, Paui E. Subject: RE: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Paulr This is no surprise! William Howard CDC Facility Team Leader Office of Health and Safety 404.639.2174 678.614.7253? wch3@cdc.gov From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, Aprii 21, 2010 7:43 AM To: Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocoomHS); (cocrocoolonsy Subject: Fw: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule FYI. This is in response to our request to provide best guess at realistic, schedule. Suggest we share with programs tomorrow. Thanks, Paul 4134-8390505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Mondav,r April 19, 2010 2:19 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOKBFC) Subject: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Pa ul, Attached is preliminary procurement and construction schedule. Schedule is based on input from Willis Mechanical and P50. Call ifyou have questions. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road ME. MG Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Nil?438330? Ceir: 4011?8256321? Fax: email: {ulgdamv Maths, Chester From: Ib? (CDCJOIDINCEZIEH Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 8:19 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule ightl You can present it as an agenda item. From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 ?:43 AM To: Howard, William (Bill) Subject: FW: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule FYI. This is in response to our request to provide best guess at realistic. PRELIMINARY schedule. Suggest we share with programs tomorrow. Thanks, Paul 404-639?0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:19 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Paul, Attached is preliminary procurement and construction schedule. Schedule is based on input from Willis Mechanical and PGO. Call if you have questions. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-483-330? Cell: assesses? Fax: rte?assess? email: KMossl ?oor: a, ov Mathe, Chester From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFCI) Sent: Wednesday, April 21. 2010 T143 AM To: Howard William (Bill) (cocrocoorosaai; (cocrororNCEZIo) Subject: FW: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Attachments: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Scheduiexlsx I FYI. This is in response to our request to provide best guess at realistic, PRELIMINARY schedule. Suggest we share with programs tomorrow. I Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday; April 19, 2010 2:19 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: ?ll'li'alpoler Kenneth K. Subject: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Paul, Attached is preliminary procurement and construction schedule. Schedule is based on input from Willis Mechanical and P60. Call if you have questions. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: noses-3307 Cell: 404-025-532? Fax: email: KMossl@odc.gov Task Name Issue to PGO Construction Procurement Award Contract Safetvaecuritnyobilization Shop Drawing Suhmittals Equipment Release Lab Shut Down Date OHS Decon Mechanical Test and Blance OHS Smoke Test Walk Through Punch List Lab Re-opens Duration 1 day 23 days 15 days 15 days 30 days 40 days 1 day 3 days 22 days 5 days 5 days 5 days 1 day Start Mon 3115;10 Mon 3/16/10 Thu S/l?flU Wed 10/6/10 Wed l?f?fl? Wed mime Mon Mon lfl?ll Thu 1f20f11 Mon 2/21/11 Mon 2f28f11 Mon 2/28/11 Mon 3!?!11 Finish Mon 8fl?f10 Wed Qfl?fl? Wed lof?fl? Tue 10/26/10 Tue unset] Tue . Man 1f17f11 Wed 1/19/11 Fri Fri 2/25/11 Fri 3,!4111 Fri Mon 3/?1?11 Mathe, Chester From: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday. April 20, 2010 2:54 PM To: Raymond, George Subject: Fw: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Attachments: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedulexlsx Fyi Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Moss,r Karen To: Proust, Paul E. (CDCXOCODIBFO) Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Mon Apr 19 14:13:51 2010 Subject: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Paul, Attached is preliminary procurement and construction schedule. Schedule is based on input from Willis Mechanical and P60. Call if you have questions. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS ?ttlantar Georgia 30333 or?ce: noses-ass? Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: ?ll-433260? email: El?gssl @cdcgov Task Name issue to P60 Construction Procurement Award Contract Safetingecurityr}r Mobilization Shop Drawing Submittals Equipment Release Lab Shut Down Date OHS Decon Mechanical Test and Blance OHS Smoke Test Walk Through Punch List Lab Re-opens Duration 1 clay 23 days 15 days 15 days 30 days 40 days 1 day 3 days 22 days 5 days 5 days 5 days 1 dayr Start Mon 8/ 16/ 10 Mon 81'16/ 10 Thu 9/15/10 Wed 10/51?10 Wed 10/ 6f 10 Wed Mon 1/1?f11 Mon 1/17f11 Thu 1/20/11 Mon 2/21f11 Mon 2/23/11 Mon 2/28/11 Mon 3/75/11 Finish Mon Bfl?XlO Wed 9f15f10 Wed 10ft?le Tue 10f25f10 Tue 11/16f10 Tue 1/11/11 Mon 1f17/11 Wed Fri Zfl?fll Fri 2/25/11 Fri Fri 3f4f11 Mon 3f?,?11 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday. April 20. 2010 6:58 AM To: Moss, Karen Subject: RE: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Appreciate it: Thanks, Paul 4 04-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:19 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Paul, Attached is preliminary procurement and construction schedule. Schedule is based on input from Willis Mechanical and P60. Call if you have questions. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Hausa?sac? Cell: 404-525-6327 Fax: 270-488-2657 email: @cdc gov Mathe, Chester (cowocoorosee) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, April 19. 2010 2:19 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFW Cc: Walpole: Kenneth K. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Procurement and Construction Schedule Attachments: P2009453 Procurement and IConstruction Schedulexlsx PauL Attached is preliminary procurement and construction schedule. Schedule is based on input from Willis Mechanical and P60. Call if you have questions. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1800 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-525-632? Fax: email: KMosslr'ciiodcgov Task Name Issue to P60 Construction Procurement Award Contract SafetnyecuritylMobilization Shop Drawing Submittals Equipment Release Lab Shut Down Date OHS Decon Mechanical Test and Blance OHS Smoke Test Walk Through Punch List Lab Re-opens Duration 1 day 23 days 15 days 15 clays 30 days ?10 days 1 day 3 clays 22 days 5 days 5 days 5 days 1 day Start Mon Bil?flo Mon 8/163'10 Thu 9/15/10 Wed 10/6/10 Wed 10f6/ 10 Wed 11/17/10 - Mon 1/17f11 Mon Thu Mon Mon 323/11 Mon 2f28/?11 Mon 3/2711 Finish Mon 8/16/10 Wed 9f15f10 Wed 10l?f10 Tue 10f26!10 Tue llfl?fl? Tue 1f11I11 Mon #12711 Wed Fri 2/13f11 Fri 2/25f11 Fri 3/4111 Fri 3.01/11 Mon 3mm rbh3t42 IDMEIAE 262mh. Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday. April 15. 2010 8:1? AM To: Bowen. Ken L. g5: Ravi . George (CDCIOCOOJBFO) "Heck-.- Vivariur'n Project Ken: George and I had an off-line conversation with Charles Daniels. He is going to get back with us with a projected timeline. although it will have projections from sources outside his control Thanks. Paul 404639?0505 From: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday. April 14.. 2010 1:35 PM BOWE L. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) dirtiest: -- ivarium Project Ken: Concerning the Vivarium project, the Charles Daniels update was ?To PGO 10(4". He indicated this is the time required to complete design and put together the FPAA. have been here for seven and a half months, and now realize why program people (customers) can get very frustrated with BFO. It appears that. unless; i. It is less than $110,000 2. We keep the project within FMEO. and 3. We can put together JOFOC justi?cation. it is veryr difficult to maintain control of delivery dates. and be proactive in sharing that info with customers. 30. at this time. I do not Know what the P60 timefrarne is. nor the contractors timetable. It would only be a shot in the dark to try to provide Tony Sanchez and the HOG a projected shutdown date. Paul Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 7:50 AM To: Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: A Facility Project?s 2009453 - HVAC Modi?cations forl ?3333142 U5 0 5262M: I FPAA has been Board Approved Thanks. Paul 404-639?0505 From: i?'ns (CDC) Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 2:52 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: A Facilty Project's 2009453 - HVAC Modi?cations fori 12': ?523'? IFPAA has been Board Approved A. FPAA for 2009453 HVAC Modi?cations forl '?i?Gi-ii ?5 i 2523'? lhas been Board Approved- NOTE: Please check the Board Comments tab for any comments provided by the Board. Please call IFMS Support at 7?0-488-2773, if you have questions or need additional assistance. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. Sent: Wednesday. April 14. 2010 1:Vivarium Project Concerning the Vivarium project, the Charles Daniels update was ?To PGO He indicated this is the time required to complete design and put together the FPAA. . have been here for seven and a half months. and now realize why program people (customers) can get very frustrated i with BFO. It appears that, unless; 1. it is less than $110,000 2. We keep the project within FMEO, and 3. We can put together JOFOCjusti?cationI it is very dif?cult to maintain control of delivery dates, and be proactive in sharing that into with customers. So, at this time. I do "of From" "that +'ie PGO timeframe is, nor the contractors timetable. ltwould only be a shot in the dark to try to provide "it"iiLif-ic 52?23 and the HOG a projected shutdown date. Paul Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:17 PM To: Moss, Karen Pro ast, Paul E. Walpole. Kenneth K. Williams. Allison (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Daniele. Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ: Lingier, Arthur R. Nogueira, William P. Ford. Maria Cristina Powell, Nathaniel RE: P2000453 - Fan Failure Test $233114? UAS-C- 2525 Subject: The date for this test has been changed to May 10th at 10:00 am. Ijust want to clarify because the question has been asked; according to Steve Koob when one fan fails the vivarium will go positive instead of negative; air will ?ow out of the lab instead of into. Can 0H8 direct if we need to take any other precautions? As I understand the animals will be in hepa filtered cages or biobubbles. Thanks, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 3"?0?438?030? Cell: 404-325-0132? Fax: TED-4802557 whammy From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:01 PM To: Probst, Paul E. th K. Williams, Allison Cc: Howard, WilIiarn (Bill) "big-?42?SE-?323i?- Daniels, Charles E. Arthur R. Nogueira, William P. Ford, Maria Cristina Powell, Nathaniel Subject: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test {bli3il42 U-S-C- 269alhl Ladies and Gentlemen. Required to be present at this test are have the above referenced fan failure test scheduled for May 7 Ill John Goodin (Fan Manufacturer?s Rep). Ken Walpole and his controlsllison Williams andfo Dave Welch (TAB Services)I and myself. The test will include the following: 1. Manually fail fan#at the starter on the roof. 2. Observation of resu ts physically and via controls at the roof andfor penthouse. 4. 5. 6 TAB Services to measure 8. record duct air flow and static pressure: damper position; damper pressure drop damper air ?ow leakage; fan amperage and other data as deemed necessary. All measurements will be taken on the roof. Start Fan Manually fail Fan and repeat the above process. Visual of ping pong ball reaction at the floor during the test and results recorded. Ken Walpole, John Goodin, David Welch and myself will be on the roof at the fans performing the test. to provide visual of ping pong ball reaction and assist as needed. ARB is to be on The test is exacted to take approximately 4 hours. No one will he allowed on the except Allison Williams and hd fo' animal assistance if needed. I I3i'42 Vivarium area during this test Call me if you have quastions. Regards. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Cii?on Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 4?4-325-632? Fax: Will-433465? email: KMossliaicdcsov Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCFOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 AM To: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBF a Subject: FW: P2000453 - Fan Failure Test (?(31142 U-S-C- FYI Thanks. Paul 404-839?0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:01 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (cos/ocoozsro); .. - K. (socioCooxsFO); (cocrocoochHS); $153.13? (cocrolormcpotso); Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Nogueira, William P. Ford, Maria Cristina Powell, Nathaniel I Subject: P2009453 Fan Failure Test Ladies and Gentlemen, i have the above referenced tan failure test scheduled for May Ti 10?0" '1 Required to be present at this testbarg2 USE Ken Walpole and his controls technician Allison Williams andior ,?dohn Goodin-{Fa-n-Ma-n-ufacturerfs. . Dave Welch (TAB Services), and myself. The test will include the following: 1. Manually fail fan at the starter on the roof. 2. Observation of results physically and via controls at the roof andior penthouse. 3. TAB Services to measure 8: record duct air flow and static pressure; damper position; damper pressure drop damper air ?ow leakage; fan amperage and other data as deemed necessary. All measurements will be taken on the roof. 4. Start Fan 5. Manually fail Fan are and repeat the above process. 6 Visual of ping pong ball reaction at the floor duringthe test and results recorded. Ken Walpole, John Goodin, David Welsh and myself will be on the roof at the fans performing the test. to provide visual of ping pong ball reaction and assist as needed. ARB is to be on hand to animal assistance if needed. The test is ex acted to take approximately 4 hours. No one will be allowed on the $313.42 Ibh'B.? . .. I 25231?- Call me if you have questions. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road HE. Ms Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Oi?ce: Cell: 404-825?82? Fax: email: KMussl Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent To: Subject: Koob, Stephen H. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Tuesda Aril13, 2010 2:2? PM new (oocrocoorc-SHE - Probst Paul E. (cocrocooreFO) Re: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test (blt33242 U-S-C- Okay then what? No body is going to do anything on the root but see if bypass dampers shut and they will never know if they are tight Sent from my BlackElerry Wireless Handheld From: To: Koob, Stephen H. Sent: Tue Apr 13 14:23:30 2010 Subject: Fw: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test 252mm {straws 05.0. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIUCOOIBFO) To: Probst, Paul E. (coo/ocooraFo); Wal ole Kenneth K. (morocco/ere); Williams, Allison mitt" (CDCIOI Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Imus: tbs-[5} Daniels, Charles E. LingIer, Arthur R. Nogueira, William P. Ford, Maria Cristina Powell, Nathaniel Sent: Tue Apr 13 14:01:09 2010 Subject: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test (WSW Ladies and Gentlemen, I have the above referenced tan failure test scheduled for May 7 Ken Walpole and his controls technician Allison Williams andfor Required to be present at this test are I Dave Welch Services). and myself. The test will include the following: 252m;- 1 "umgn'?'all'yuf?il El at the starter on the roof. 2. Observation of results physically and via controls at the roof andror penthouse. 3. TAB Services to measure 8; record duct air flow and static pressure; damper position; damper pressure drop damper air flow leakage; fan amperage and other data as deemed necessary. All measurements will be taken on the roof. (bi rat-4 4. Start Fan 5. Manually fail Fan nd repeat the above process. 6. Visual of ping pong ball reaction at the ?oor during the test and results recorded. Ken Walpole, John Goodin, David Welch and myselfwill be on the roof at the fans performing the test. provide visual of ping pong ball reaction and assist as needed. ARB is to be on hand for an mal assistance if ,b,,3,,gg_eerged. The test is exacted to take approximat - 3523*? this test except "Atlison William's Edd . . U305 'VtvarIu-rn- ICall me if you have questions. Regards. Karen Moss FEE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Cii?on Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: rim-433.3307 Cell: 404-325-6327? Fax: WEI-4354557 emaii: KMos-ulfaacdconv Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEF) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:01 PM Probst Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Williams, Allison Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOJDSHE): Daniels. Charles E. Lingler. Arthur R. Nogueira. William P. Ford, Maria Cristina Powell. Nathaniel (CDCIOIDJNCEZID) . (mist-42 P2009453 - Fan Failure Test 7.3%th Ladies and Gentlemen. I have the above referenced fan failure test scheduled for May at 10:00 a Ken Wa Dave Required to be present at this test are John Goodin [Fan Manufacturer?s Rep). - nician Allison Williams andlor and myself. Ipole and his elch (TAB Services? Ibzibi The test will include the fol - Manually fail fan at the starter on the roof. Observation of results physically and via controls at the roof andlor penthouse. TAB Services to measure a record duct air ?ow and static pressure; damper position; damper pressure drop damper air ?ow leakage; fan amperage and other data as deemed necessary. All measurements will be taken on the roof. Start Fan Manually fail Fan #and repeat the above process. Visual of ping pong ball reaction at the floor during the test and results recorded. Ipole. John Goodin, David Welch and myself will be on the roof at the fans performing the test. to provide visual of ping pong ball reaction and assist as neededfor animal assistance if needed. The testis exected to take approximater 4 hours. No one will be allowed on the [3-142 ivarium area during this test except Allison Williams and Call me if you have questions. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechan ital Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: T704 88-266? email: KMossll?Dodwov Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 8:58 AM To: Prohst, Paul E. Subject: RE: P2009453 Fan Failure Test thanks Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: rte-433.330? Cell: 4o4-325?5527 Fax: "no-433.255: email: From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 8:56 AM To: Moss, Karen Subject: Re: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test No. Room Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCDDIBFDJ Cc: Waipole, Kenneth K. Sent: Thu Apr 08 08:49:17 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test is that in the basement? ican?t get in there with my badge. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta: Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Call: 404-825-6827 Fax: email: From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 2:27 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: Re: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test :33 room is available. )1 Sent from my BIackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Moss, Karen To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFG) Sent: Wed Apr 0? 12:25:06 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test Okay, can one ofyou guys see if that is available? Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 170435-3307 Cell: 4c4-szs-532? Fax: muse-2557 email: .KMLI @adaa? From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 2010 5:24 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Accepted: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test When: Thu April 08 2010 11:00 PM Eastern 'nme (US Canada). Where: com 020 Ib': i3? Ihave a meeting until meet at lb) Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. Sent: Thursday, April 03. 2010 8:56 AM To: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Subject: Re: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test NU, Room E41311 Sent from my BiackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Moss, Karen To: Pnlobst, Paul E. Co: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Thu Apr 08 08:49:17 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test Is that in the basement? I can't get in there with my badge. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: email: KMossl @cdcgov From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 7:2? PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: Re: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test room is available. Sent from my BIackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFOJ To: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wed Apr 0? 1?:25:06 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test Okay, can one of you guys see if that is available? Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?oe?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Nil-430530? Cell: 404-325-532? Fax: email: Moselt?lcdagux From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 2010 5:24 PM To: Moss;r Karen Subject: Accepted: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test when: 'Hlurs April 08 2010 11:00 PM Eastern Time (US Canada). $35211? W??re: Room - - - {bi - - I have a meetan until meet at Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEF) From: F'robst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday. April 08, 2010 8:56 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 Fan Failure Test No. Room Sent from my BlaoKBerry Wireless Handheld From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Thu Apr 08 08:49:17? 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Fan Failure Test Is that in the basement? 1 can't get in there with my badge. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 7'70-433-8307 Cell: 404-325-552? Fax: WEI-4384667 em ail: KMossl From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 3:27 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 Fan Failure Test {bi m. room is available. Sent from my BIackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDOIBFO) To: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wed Apr 0? 1?:25:06 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test Okay, can one of you guys see if that is available? Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cali: 404?325-682? Fax: Willow-206? email: KMosslca odgpov -~-~~Original From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, April 02?, 2010 5:24 PM To: Moss, Karen Subject: Accepted: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test When: Thursda April 08. 2010 11:00 PM Eastern Time (US 8: Canada). Room have a meeting until ?l?l am in $314 Can do it ifwe meet at Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 3:49 AM To: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Walpole. Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFW Subject: RE: P2009453 Fan Failure Test is that in the basement? I can?t get in there with my badge- Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE MS Atlanta1 Georgia 30333 Office: rte-433-3%? Cell: 404-325-8527 Fax: email: KMoslega dc gov From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 ?:27 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test (bi ?oom is available. Hi4 Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Moss, Karen To: Protestl Paul E. Sent: Wed Apr 07 17:25:06 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test Okay, can one of you guys see if that is available? Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404325?032? Fax: Tim-433266? emit??e?m?edss? Appointment-?? From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 5:24 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Accepted: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test m3,? En: Thurs April 08, 2010 11:00 PM Eastern Time (US Canada). W. ere: Room i have a meeting untii meet at Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Prohst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 ?:27 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Walpole. Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test oorn is available. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld .From: Moss, Karen To: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wed Apr 07 1?:25:06 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test Okay. can one of you guys see if that Is available? Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: recess-sac? Cell: 4114-5254532? Fax: Trill-433460? em ail: @cdcgov Appointment-w- From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 5:24 PM To: Moss;r Karen Subject: Accepted; P2009453 Fan Failure Test When: Thursday, April 08, 2010 11:00 PM Eastern Time (US 31 Canada). $55212? Where: [Room IE 42 aszam. l'lfallre _a_meeting..until. 11 amin ..Gan-do--it if-we at 252m;- Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss. Karen Sent: Wednesday, April 2010 5:25 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 - Fan Failure Test Okay: can one of you guys see if that is available? Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: noses-53o? Cell: moses-5327 Fax: em ail: Klvloss @o?m ??-Original Appointment-m- Fram: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 2010 5:24 PM To: Moss, Karen Subject: Accepted: P2009453 Fan Failure Test When: Thursc?r, April 08 2010 11:00 PM Eastern Time (US 8.: Canada). Where: Room have a meeting until meet at Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFQ Wednesday, April 07, 2010 4:58 PM Probst,Pau E I I I. i REE. 132009453 VAC Modi?cations From: Sent I fl": 4379?. zhs?aun Suiaject: Paul, Do you know what the vaccine production schedule is? Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: rte-488.330? Cell: 404-325-5527 Fax: 71?0-433-266?? email: KMosslt?chc gov From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 To: Moss, Karen Luv? 42 am. sifbiect: neezoowss HVAC Modi?cations Karen: Appreciate the info. Wasn't In yesterday afternoon. Just got your message. Based on my interpretation of the meeting minutes, it appears that is limited to a shutdown of the month of July, and BFO has countered that with the necessary design and procurement phases, the month of July is not possible. Therefore, we have an unresolved issue. i anticipate that the next question to BFO is going to be, "What can you do?? I think a realistic schedule (even if it is a ten line milestone overview) should be presented based on what Art and yourself know about the design and procurement durations, and see what they can live with. At least we will have a starting point for determining strategies to get it to where they find it acceptable. 1 know that you have a fairly detailed narrative scope perhaps we could put that in the hands of Willis for their input on long lead items as well as give them a jump start on price development. The HOG meeting is at 9 am. Can you get with Art and e-mail something crude that can be presented? it would be preferable if is in the body of an e-mail, and not an attachment, since I will out of of?ce starting at 8 am. and am unable to access attachments thru Blackberry. It has not ever been formally stated, but it is my understanding that we are working around El vaccine production cycles for the next cold season. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:31 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCDDIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 {bir3iz42 HVAC Modi?cations Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: 770-488-330? Cell: 404-825-6322? Fax: email: KMosleeigdc gov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:52 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Keller, Kath Kathi Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) Jar??- Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 (ensign u.s.c. VAC Modi?cations Ladies and Gentlemen. Attached are the minutes of our 3__22_2010 meeting. Please advise should you have any additions or corrections. Attached is the OHS air?ow diagram thatl have revised to show the new wall location. Also, I have modi?ed the existing directional air flow for the area based on existing drawings and the baseline test and balance that was done. The decon area is neutral to the OHS to direct it this is to be maintain as neutral or changed as positive to the autoclave area as the future airflow arrows now indicate. I I Best RE ards is}: U33 File: air >3 File: P2009453 Meeting 3_22_2010.pdf Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Car: 404-825?6327 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 3:51 PM To: Walpole, Kennett Subject: FW: P2009453 U-S-C- HVAC Modi?cations FYI Thanks, Paul 404?639-0505 From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 3:48 PM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. (C Subject: RE: P2009453 U-S-C- HVAC Modi?cations Karen: Il?l' out; as present at the meeting, but TB was not. These are the only two programs that have animals in the area. Based on $301? input, and their understanding of TB's requirements, there is flexibility as to the START date for the shutdown. They indicated that they do need three months advance notice prior to the shutdown, and reiterated the desire to minimize shutdown time. We told them that until a contractor has the scope, a shutdown duration commitment could not be made, but that BFO would work the contractor to shorten the duration to the extent possible. As Art indicated in the March 13 meeting, there are many activities that have to occur before the START. A crude schedule of this magnitude with thoss activities would bene?t the programs by giving them a projected start date, but I would advise that only reaiistic info be shared and not over promise anything. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOKBFO) Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 3:11 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOT Subject: RE: P2009453 U500 HVAC Modi?cations Paul, Sorry, I get here at 8:30 no way to pull something together by 9:00. How did the meeting go? As stated in the meeting minutes no schedule can be confirmed until the contractor has the documents. Karen Moss FLE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officers Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Nil-435450? Cell: 404-025?632? Fax: email: KMossI @od ego? From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 ?:31 AM To: Moss, Karen Subject: RE: P2009453 (bli3li42 U-S-C- HVAC Modi?cations Karen: Appreciate the info. Wasnit in yesterday afternoon. Just got your message. Based on my interpretation of the meeting minutes. it appears the in?? is limited to a shutdown of the month of July, and BFO has countered that with the necessary design and procurement phases. the month of July is not possible. Therefore, we have an unresolved issue. I anticipate that the next question to BFO is going to be. ?What can you do?" i think a realistic schedule (even if it is a ten line milestone overview) should be presented based on what Art and yourself know about the design and procurement durations. and see what they can live with. At least we will have a starting point for determining strategies to get it to where they ?nd it acceptable. I know that you have a fairly detailed narrative scope perhaps we could put that in the hands of Willis for their input on long lead items as well as give them a jump start on price development. The HOG meeting is at 9 am. Can you get with Art and e-mail something crude that can be presented? It would be preferable if is in the body of an e-mail. and not an attachment, since I will out of office starting at 8 am, and am unable to access attachments thru Blackberry. it has not ever been formally stated. but it is my understanding that we are working around vaccine production cycles for the next cold season. Thanks. Paul 404?639?0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:31 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFU) Subject: FW: P2009453 U-SC- HVAC Modi?cations at Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1500 Clifton Road NE. M5 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: WEI-4308307 coil: 404?625682?? Fax: email: Khtossli?acdcgov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:52 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Keller, Kath ri Kathi gglgole, Kennett (cocilocooisFO); Howard, william (Bill) (coo/ocoomHS); I Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIDCODIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. CDC DCGD Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. Subject: P2009453 vac Modi?cations Ladies and Gentlemen, Attached are the minutes of our 3_22_2010 meeting. Please advise should you have any additions or corrections. Attached is the OHS air?ow diagram that I have revised to show the-new wall location. Also, I have modi?ed the existing directional air flow for the decon area based on existing drawings and the baseline test and balance that was done. The decon area is neutral to theOHS to direct ifthis is to be maintain as neutral or changed as positive to the autoclave area as the future air?ow arrows now indicate. Best Regards. lanai-42 use a File: vivarium air flow-billhoward-revBFO.ppt File: P2009453 3_22_2010.pdf Karen Moss FLE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 4104-8254332? Fax: Will-480256? email: KMossl?cdcgov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Protest. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 3:40 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCODIBFD) Ce: Lingler, ArthurP Subject: RE: P2009453 USC- WAC Modi?cations Karen: was present at the meeting, but TB was not. These are the only two programs that have animals in the area. Based on input, and their understanding of requirements. there is ?exibility as to the START date for the shutdown. They indicated that they do need three months advance notice prior to the shutdown, and reiterated the desire to minimize shutdown time. We told them that until a contractor has the scope, a shutdown duration commitment could not be made, but that BFO Would work the contractor to shorten the duration to the extent possible. As Art indicated in the March 18 meeting, there are many activities that have to occur before the START. A crude schedule of this magnitude with those activities wouid bene?t the programs by giving them a projected start date, but I would advise that only realistic info be shared and not over promise anything. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 3:11 PM To: Probst,r Paul E. (CDCIDCOO BFO Subject: RE: P2009453 HVAC Modi?cations Paul, Sorry, I get here at 8:30 no way to pull something together by 9:00. How did the meeting go? As stated in the meeting minutes no schedule can be con?rmed until the contractor has the documents. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Ci?'lce: 77?0-488-830? Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: 770480256? email: KMessl@cdc.gov From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 7:31 AM To: Moss, Karen I Subject: RE: P2009453 libi?ir? VAC Modi?cations Karen: Appreciate the info. Wasn't in yesterday afternoon. Just got your message. Based on my interpretation of the meeting minutes. it appears that is iimited to a shutdown ofthe month of July, and BFO has countered that with the necessary design and procurement phases, the month of July is not possible. Therefore, we have an unresolved issue. I anticipate that the next question to BFO is going to be. "What can you do?" i think a realistic schedule (even if it is a ten line milestone overview) should be presented based on what Art and yourself know about the design and procurement durations, and see what they can live with. At least we will have a starting point for determining strategies to get it to where they find it acceptable. I know that you have a fairly detailed narrative scope perhaps we could put that in the hands of Wiilis fortheir input on long lead items as well as give them a jump start on price development. The HOG meeting is at 9 am. Can you get with Art and e-mail something crude that can be presented? It would be preferable if is in the body of an e-mail, and not an attachment, since I will out of of?ce starting at 8 am, and am unable to access attachments thru Blackberry. It has not ever been formally statedI but it is my understanding that we are working around vaccine production cycles for the next cold season. Thanks. Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:31 PM To: Probst, Paul E. BFO Subject: FW: P2009453 (bii3li42 U-SC- HVAC Modi?cations Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Cantracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: em silt KMossi@cdc.gov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31r 2010 1:52 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Keller, Kath Kathi K. (cocrocoorsFo); Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocooroHs); A (cocrocooxonsy runs- Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. Subject: P2009453 (bll3li4l2 VAC Modi?cations Ladies and Gentlemen, Attached are the minutes of our 3_22_2010 meeting. Please advise should you have any additions or corrections. Attached is the OHS air?ow diagram that I have revised to show the new wall location. Also, I have modified the existing directional air flow for the decon area based on existing drawings and the baseline test and balance that was done. The decon area is neutral to the OHS to direct if this is to be maintain as neutral or changed as positive to the autoclave area as the future air?ow arrows now indicate. Best Regards, ruler-42 <4 File: vivarium air ab File: P2009453 HVAC Mod; El 3_22_2010.pdf Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-433?830? Cell: 404?325?6527 Fax: email: KMoss @cdc.gov Maths, Chester From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, April 0?lI 2010 3:11 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: P2009453 HVAC Modi?cations Paul, Sorry, I get here at 8:30 no way to pull something together by 9:00. How t?d the meeting go? As stated in the meeting minutes no schedule can be confirmed until the contractor has the documents. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-5327 Fax: ??0-430-250? email: KMossll?l'cdogov From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 ?:31 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 (25523}? U-S-C- Modi?cations a Karen: Appreciate the info. Wasn't in yesterday afternoon. Just got your message. Based on my interpretation of the meeting minutes. it appears that is limited to a shutdown of the month of July, and BFO has countered that with the necessary design and procurement phases, the month of July is not possible. Therefore, we have an unresolved issue. I anticipate that the next question to BFO is going to be, ?What can you do?" i think a realistic schedule (even if it is a ten line milestone overview) should be presented based on what Art and yourself know about the design and procurement durations, and see what they can live with. At least we will have a starting point for determining strategies to get it to where they ?nd it acceptable. i know that you have a fairly detailed narrative scope perhaps we could put that in the hands of Willis for their input on long lead items as well as give them a jump start on price development. The HOG meeting is at 9 am. Can you get with Art and e-mail something crude that can be presented? it would be preferable if is in the body of an e?mail, and not an attachment. since i will out of of?ce starting at 8 am. and am unable to access attachments thru Blackberry. It has not ever been formally stated, but it is my understanding that we are working around IE vaccine production cycles for the next cold season. Thanks. Paul 404-539-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:31 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOO BFO Subject: FW: P2009453 {bli3ii42 U-S-C- HvAc Modi?cations Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K's? Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Ceil: trim-325682? Fax: 770-433-255? email: (credo. eov From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:52 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jefferyr Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Keller, Kath Kathi K. Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocooioHS); ma (cocrocoorOHS); We? Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. Subject: P20U9453 HVAC Modi?cations Ladies and Gentlemen. Attached are the minutes of our 3_22_20?lo meeting. Please advise should you have any additions or corrections. Attached is the OHS airflow diagram that I have revised to show the new wall location. Also, have modi?ed the existing directional air flow for the decon area based on existing drawings and the baseiine test and balance that was done. The decon area is neutral to the OHS to direct if this is to be maintain as neutral or changed as positive to the autoclave area as the future airflow arrows now indicate. Best Regards. loliaggdg File: vivarium air File: P2009453: HVAC Mod. Heating"Minutes: Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: mass-sac? Gail: 434-825-532? Fax: W34 233-2557 email: Maths, Chester (CDCIOCDOIOSEP) From: Probst Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFOJ Sent: Thursday. April 01, 2010 8:46 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. PURMCOWHFD Subject: Fw: P2009453 U-S-C- ?5 anc Modi?cations FYI Sent from my BlackEierry Wireless Handheld From: Probst, Paul E. To: Moss, Karen Sent: Thu Apr 01 0?:31:27? 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 gig}? UIS-C- HVAC Modi?cations Karen: Appreciate the info. Wasn't in yesterday afternoon. Just got your message. Based on my Interpretation of the meeting minutes. it appears thatis limited to a shutdown of the month of July, and BFO has countered that with the necessary design and procurement phases, the month of July is not possible. Therefore, we have an unresolved issue. I anticipate that the next question to BFO is going to be, ?What can you do?" I think a realistic schedule {even if it is a ten line milestone overview} should be presented based on what Art and yourself know about the design and procurement durations. and see what they can live with. At least we will have a starting point for determining strategies to get it to where the}.r ?nd it acceptable. I know that you have a fairly detailed narrative scope perhaps we could put that in the hands of?d'l?llis for their input on long lead items as well as give them ajump start on price development. The HOG meeting is at 9 am. Can you get with Art and e-mail something crude that can be presented? It would be preferable if is in the body of an e-mail, and not an attachment. since I will out of of?ce starting at 8 am. and am unable to access attachments thru Blackberry. it has not ever been formallyr stated, but it is my understanding that we are working around vaccine production cycles for the next cold season. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, March Ell!r 2010 2:31 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoo am Subject: Fw: P2009453 HVAC Modi?cations Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404?825-082? Fax: Will-488406? email: KMossl {a;cdc.eov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:52 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Keller, Kath Kathi Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) i Bowen, Ken L. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. Subject: F2009453 U-S-C- HVAC Modi?tions at Ladies and Gentlemen, Attached are the minUtes of our 3_22_2010 meeting. Please advise should you have any additions or corrections. Attached is the OHS air?ow diagram that] have revised to show the new wall location. Also, I have modified the existing directional air flow for the {mg i=5? ?as on existing drawings and the baseline test and balance that was clone. The decon area is neutral to the L, ,3 2525 OHS to direct if this is to be maintain as neutral or changed as positive to the autoclave area as the future airflow arrows now indicate. Best Regards, lbijr? . - - File: vivarium air File: P2009453 Med. Minutes 3_22_2010.pdf Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: mass-33o? Cell; 404?825?6327 Fax; email: KMoss I {aged c. eov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 T131 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIDCOOJBFO subject; P2009453 (cyst-42 0.5.0. HVAC Modi?cations Karen: Appreciate the info. Wasn't in yesterday afternoon. Just got your message. Based on my interpretation of the meeting minutes, it appears that is limited to a shutdown of the month of July, and BFO has countered that with the necessary design and procurement phases, the month of July is not possible. Therefore. we have an unresolved issue. i anticipate that the next question to BFO is going to be. ?What can you do?" i thinks realistic schedule (even if it is a ten line milestone overview) should be presented based on what Art and yourself know about the design and procurement durations, and see what they can live with. At least we will have a starting point for determining strategies to get it to where they find it acceptable. I know that you have a fairly detailed narrative scope perhaps we could put that in the hands ofWillis for their input on long lead items as well as give them ajump start on price development. The HOG meeting is at 9 am. Can you get with Art and e-mail something crude that can be presented? It would be preferable if is in the body of an email. and not an attachment, since I will out of office starting at 8 am. and am unable to access attachments thru Blackberry. It has not ever been formally stated. but it is my understanding that we are working around Elvaccine production cycles for the next cold season. Thanks, Paul 404?639?0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:31 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: FW: P2009453 U-S-C- HVAC Modi?cations a Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta Georgia 30333 Of?ce: CEII: 404-325-582? Fax: ?estas?255? email: From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:52 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Williams, Jeffery Campbell, John Michael (Mike) Black, Carolyn Keilar, Kath Kathi - - - .- neth Howard, William (Bill) {mucosa/OHS); . (cociccooicHS); Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. l? Lingler, Arthur R. Tanya A. Subject: P2009453 .lbii3i=42 U-S-C- HVAC Modi?cations ?J'R?I'afh't Ladies and Gentlemen, Attached are the minutes of our 3_22_2010 meeting. Please advise should you have any additions or corrections. Attached is the OHS air?ow diagram that have revised to show the new wall location. Also, I have modi?ed the existing directional air flow forthe decon area based on existing drawings and the baseline test and balance that was done. The decon area is neutral to the OHS to direct if this is to be maintain as neutral or changed as positive to the autoclave area as the future air?ow arrows now indicate. Best Regards, File: vivarium airflow-billhoward-revHFO.ppt File: 3_22__2010.pdf Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 O?ice: Cell: 404-825-6327 Fax: email: KMosslfaicdegov Page 1199 USE. 252mm Page 1200 USE. 252mm Page 1201 {bJ{3)142 LL30. 262a{h} Pago1ol1 TEMPLATE - Gawain-1 Turin-lg Lug [21.119 reject: Contracting Of?cer. Contract NIL: Bowman: Tmhimu: Document Returned . Dan Raul-and No. Document a Descrip'l'mn "Trnnamiuod . Tmn?n?nad'To Hammad ?nd?HMFDllciplin? 1' mu If? lDrganlzallan and For: an] {Urganlza?on and Penna) {Organlutrm and Pinon} 1 :?mlfil?jni mam-I'd w1a?m5 p-s Prlma Cam ulicn Puma Gum m? 404-937-3455 mm 3-456? P's Primal Conslrudlun M's Mamaniw LT Hachanlnal drawfng: CD ROM magma Mechanical Nil-123456? Nil-123455? M?s Manic-31 L?s Landscapa 1.1.1 Plumb'ng drawing CD ROM Landscape 404-123-455? M?s Mechanlcal Controls Inc. 1.1.2 Canlrol drawing ?le CD ROM mamas Controls 3 710-123-4567 P's Prime Consirucrfan F's Floating 1.2 Floor Plan ria CD Hora mamas Carpal Nil-123455? 45623-143759 2 nevi?, 3i? Eran drawing {7 ?zz?ms P's Plkna Gan srmatlan F?ma mnuamr K. 4g?937.3.453 Tao?1 123-455? 2.1 it: Elan drawinm 6 sets ?32mg P's Prim: nonhuman M's Meghnniul nasal Nil-1234515? Hanna?s? - - M'j Mich: nrtal L's Landsca 3 NJ Sarina Sula plan drawing: 1 5&1. pnnled mums Ls? dscap? mm? rra1234551 ?4-123.455; - M's Mach ?mat G's Gm?'n 2.12 Ruth: :ule pllan draMng 1 5 aal Ema? I 5 Grading "9?3 rmmassr a Harts?453: - G'l Bud'n Shnrin 2.1.2-1 33'" awn? 4 ?t5 8123:2903 sharing the ngaj 6 19704234557 A - - a? 5n I: 11111.1 :laughn drawing 1 let Ely-?2W5 5 5""9 3 Umpa?? [Endnn'fler '3 "95] A 513?123-4551! D: mum-4551 2 3 ?le Flu" drawing: 1 $31 wza?m Ma sharia] Ll?: Undargraund Delaclian Und yum? nd ?mi? Wm? ?mm? nun?123.4557 ?can? SCROLL TO RIGHT FOFI NUMEERING EXAMPLE Prl?lgd; ?125 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010-3:50 PM To: Blanchard, Thoma's'lvl. Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 I think things are getting lost in Email Translation. The email that Karen sent to Ken had nothing to do with my email below. My email below is only a follow-up to the agreements and action items following our meetingon yesterday. In reference to the email that Karen forwarded on to Ken from Lenore Mickle, PGO only requested a "ballpark figure" and a "price range? for the overall for this project. If you are adding in the price for the for ITworst case", you can use the following: $10,000 (2 at 5K each) Electrical $20,000 Controls $20,000 Total for VFD Add is between Ball park. However, as stated below, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope of this project can be determined until a final design forthe total required CFM hasbeen determined. For that matter, you cannot attempted to come-up with and IGE until you have an agreed upon scope and preliminary design. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCUUIBFOJ Subject: RE: UFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost and/or misunderstood in the e-mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGO with a detailed up-front. Lenore Mickle requested the IGE in an e?mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something I?m sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting. yesterday. I believe - from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is 1 accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, and we will re-visit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst?case estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail (as is often my problem). Anyway, I believe she needs someone's 0K in FM E0 to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the e-mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop K-QE Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 720-488-8105 Cell: 404-444-6281 e-mail: TBIancharch?cdcgov ~-~Original From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design wouid have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the ?nal design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FM EO's position is are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 404-639?3335 Cell: 404592-2599 Fax: 404-639-1685 Email: ghr?chcgov Mail stop: F-04 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:18 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) cc: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Torn, Thank you. My intent was exactly as you stated below to present to P60 the worst case cost scenario. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. M5 K-97 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-483-830? Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: 270-488?266? email: KMoslecdcgov Message-u" From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (cocrocooxaFOJ Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost andfor misunderstood in the e-mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGD with a detailed IGE up-front. Lenore Mickie requested the in an e-mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something I'm sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. i.l'FD's, and we will re-visit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst-case estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail {as is often my problem). Anyway, I believe she needs someone's OK in PM E0 to solicit that estimate from El and sent the e-maii at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 770?488?3105 Cell: 404-444-5281 e-mail: TBlanchard@cdc.gov ?~?~Original From: Raymond, George (CDCKOCODIBFOJ Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the ?nal design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FMEO's position is VFD's are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-59?-2599 Fax: 404-639-1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 Marthe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: - Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost andfor misunderstood in the e-mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGO with a detailed up?front. Lenore Mickie requested the in an e-mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something i'm sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides ofthe issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. and we will revisit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simva trying to present a worst-case estimate to PGO in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail (as is often my problem}. Anyway, I believe she needs someone's OK in FM E0 to solicit that estimate from and sent the e?mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: WEI-4886105 Cell: 404-444-5281 e-maii: TBia ncha rd @cdc.gov ?u??LUrigina From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the final design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the WM to the scope to this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, position is are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention E0 Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404-639-1685 Email: ghr?chc.gov Mait stop: F-04 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday. May 20, 20.10 1:29 PM To: Daniele, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole. Kenneth K. Probet. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the final design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FM EO's position is VFD's are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention E0 Office: 404-539-3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404-639~1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-Dtl Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCUOIOSEP) From: Walpole. Kenneth K. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Thursday. May 20. 2010 12:02 PM To: Moss, Karen Cc: F'rebst. Paul E. Daniels. Charles E. Raymond. George Subject: RE: P2009453 Karen. As you know. FMEO does currently not support the use ofVFD's on this project for the reasons we discussed at yesterday's meeting. Therefore. if you wish to pursue this option. itdetermine appropriate scope. budget. design. implementation and commissioningftesting procedures. I will contin provide controls engineering support to you and the project team for the essential portion of the project scope; the lb). orridor control system modi?cations. Thanks. Ken From: Moss. Karen Sent: Thursday. May 20. 2010 10:21 AM To: Walpole. Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst. Paul E. Daniels.r Charles E. Subject: P2009453 Ken. See below from PGO. I would like to have the control cost for the VFD's in the project's even though we aren?t sure we will proceed this way; we would at least have the cost to present to PGO- Will you please have Craig give us a control cost for VFD scenario? 1 have the cost of the and the associated electrical cost. Thank you. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: email: KMossl acdc ov Hello Karen. Can you please give me a ballpark figure for the By chance, do you have an initial IGE you can share? I ask because I need to submit a letter to the SBA and get the project on their radar screen, and a price range is required (even a range would be good). realize you are still formulating the requirement package. Thanks. [m CDC, Procurement and Grants Of?ce Buildings and Facilities Contracts Branch Phone: 7?0-488?2623 Fax: 770-433-2847 LMigkl?@?d 9g 9v This e?mail and any files transmitted with it contain US. Government information that is OFFICIAL USE ON or other types of SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED information requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure. All information is confidentiai. intended soleiy for the addressee and shall be disseminated oniy on a TO basis. To provide feedback on your recent experiences with PGO. email Feedback will be used to improve business services. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:50 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOJBFOE Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpoie, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Co: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 I think things are getting lost in Email Translation. The email that Karen sent to Ken had nothing to do with my email below. My email below is only a follow-up to the agreements and action items following our meeting on yesterday. In reference to the email that Karen forwarded on to Ken from Lenore Mickie, PGD only requested a "ballpark figure" and a "price range" for the overall IGE for this project. If you are adding in the price for the VFD's for "worst case", you can use the following: VFD's $10,000 (2 at 5K each) Electrical $20,000 Controls $20,000 Total for VFD Add is between Ball park. However, as stated below, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope of this project can be determined until a ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. For that matter, you cannot attempted to come-up with and IGE until you have an agreed upon scope and preliminary design. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, MN, MS: Atlanta, GA 30333 Of?ce: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.539.1635 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e?mail Message?? From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost andg?or misunderstood in the e-mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide FGO with a detailed up-front. Lenore Mickie requested the in an e-mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGD to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something I'm sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. i believe - from discussions i've had independently with several after the meeting that your description of the meeting below is 1 accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, and we will re-visit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst~case estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail [as is often my problem). Anyway, I believe she needs someone's OK in FMEO to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the e-mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop K-96 Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 770-488-8105 Cell: 404-444-6281 e-mail: TBlanchard@cdc.eov muOriginal Message-m- From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFCJ) Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the ?nal design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FM EO's position is VFD's are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Of?ce: 404-539-3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404-539-1685 Email: I'v'lail stop: F-04 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:13 PM To: Blanchard. Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth Probst. Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Thank you. My intent was exactly as you stated below to present to P60 the worst case cost scenario. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-488-8307 Cell: 404?825-6827 Fax: 770-488-2667 email: KMoslecdcgov ew?riginal Messages-m From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: lv?FD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost andfor misunderstood in the e?mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGO with a detailed IGE up~front. Lenore Mickie requested the IGE in an e-mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast?tracking the project as much as possible, something I'm sure that we all want. She Wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, and we will re-visit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simva trying to present a worst-case estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail (as is often my problem}. Anyway, I believe she needs someone's OK in FMEO to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the e?mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd- NE, Mail Stop K-96 Atlanta, GA 30333' Phone: 770-488-3105 Cell: 404-444-6281 e-mail: TBIanchard@cdc.gov Message??- From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow?up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to he completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the final design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, position is are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404697?2599 Fax: 404-639-1635 Email: ghr?chcgov Mail stop: F-04 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost and/or misunderstood in the e?mail translation. i think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on'this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide-P60 with a detailed up-front. Lenore Mickie requested the IGE in an e?mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something I?m sure that we all-want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarmor misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, andwe will re-visit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst-case estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail {as is often my problem). Anyway, I believe she needs someone?s 0K in FM E0 to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the e-mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1500 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop K-ss Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: Cell: 404-444-6281 e?mail: TBIanchard?cdc.gov From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. {coo/ocooxarol; Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOGIBFW Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the-VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount ofexhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the ?nal design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FMEO's position is ?v?FD?s are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention E0 Office: 404?639?3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404?639?1585 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Blanchard. Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFQ Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost and/or misunderstood in the e-mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGO with a detailed IGE up-front. Lenore Mickle requested the IGE in an e-mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something I'm sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions We had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides ofthe issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, and we will re?visit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst~case estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail (as is often my problem). Anyway, I believe she needs someone's OK in FMEO to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the e-mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 770-438-3105 Cell: 404-444-6281 e-mail: TBlanchard@cdc.gov Message--?- From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen BIanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the ?nal design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FMEO's position is are optional until (2le requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404639-1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-C-4 Mathe, Chester (cocrocoorosem From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, May 20. 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) . Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the ?nal design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FMEO's position is are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ODIOCOOIBFOIFM EC) Of?ce: 404-539-3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404?639?1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 12:02 PM To: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Daniels, Charles E. Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Karen, As you know, FMEO does currently not support the use of VFD's on this project for he reasons we discussed at yesterday's meeting. Therefore, if you wish to pursue this option, it?s up to you and to determine appropriate scope, budget, design, implementation planischedule, and commissioningitesting procedures. I will continue provide controls engineering support to you and the project team for the essential portion of the project scope; the corridor control system modi?cations. Thanks, Ken From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 10:21 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Probst, Paul E. Danielsr Charles E. (CDCXOCODIBFD) Subject: P2009453 Ken. See below from PGO. i would like to have the control cost for the VFD's in the project's IGE even though we aren't sure we will proceed this way; we would at least have the cost to present to PGO. Will you please have Craig give us a control cost for VFD scenario? I have the cost of the VFD's and the associated electrical cost. Thank you, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 7vo4aa-aso7 Cell: 404-325-632? Farr: email: Hello Karen. Can .you please give me a ballpark ?gure for the By chance. do you have an initial IGE you can share? I ask because I need to submit a letter to the SBA and get the project on their radar screen. and a price range is required {even a range would be good). I realize you are still formulating the requirement package. Thanks, Jerome CDC, Procurement and Grants Office Buildings and Facilities Contracts Branch Phone: 770?488?2623 Fax: Meadow This e-mail and an},f files transmitted with it contain U.S. Government information that is OFFICIAL USE or other types BUT UNCLASSIFIED information requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure. All information is confidential, intended solely for the addressee and shall be disseminated only on a TO basis. To provide feedback on your recent experiences with PGO. email PGD-Comments?cdcoov. Feedback will be used to improve business senrices. Marthe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Raymond, George (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 11:36 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Walpole. Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Your Per our meeting on May 19. it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs need for the Vivarium area. Based on the Test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, OHS has determined that there were no major issues of reversal of airflow in the areas. The oniy area of concern was the areas furthest away from the exhaust fan. The issues in these areas were phoenix valves operating close to their min DP operating ranges. However, this problem may be improved upon or worsened depending on the ?nal design for exhaust CFM. Howeverthe outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Fnc?ttr'es Maintenance and Engineering O?cc Centasfor Disease Control and 1600 Ctr?on Road, NW, MS: 13-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 O?ce: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 5.4 Pirate men'th tire retirement be?ts printing as e-xenti Maths, Chester From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 10:21 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Ken, See below from PGO. I would like to have the control cost for the in the project's IGE even though we aren?t sure we will proceed this way; we would at least have the cost to present to P60. Will you please have Craig give us a control cost for VFD scenario? I have the cost of the VFD's and the associated electrical cost. Thank you, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1800 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-525-632? Fax: email: KMossI IEcdcgov Hello Karen, Can you please give me a ballpark ?gure for the By chance, do you have an initial IGE you can share? I ask because I need to submit a letter to the SBA and get the project on their radar screen, and a price range is required (even a range would be good). I realize you are still formulating the requirement package. Thanks, Jane-re CDC, Procurement and Grants Office Buildings and Facilities Contracts Branch Phone: 770488-2623 Fax: ??0-488-2847 LMickle@cgc,gov This e-mail and any files transmitted with it contain US. Government information that is OFFICIAL USE or other types of SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED information requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure. All information is confidential, intended solely for the addressee and shall be disseminated only on a TO basis. To provide feedback on your recent experiences with email Feedback will be used to improve business services. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIDSEP) From: Avery Wood IV sawood@willism echcorne Sent: Wednesdav, lvlayr 19, 2010 3:48 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Walpole. Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. gwillis@willismech.com; Mickle, Lenore Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: P2009453 Revised Construction Schedule IXOS CDC 34? KB Attachments: placeholdertmp Karen, See attached schedules. These are 7 day per week schedules. They include a November start schedule, a January start schedule with the same dtuations as the November start, and a very optimistic January start schedule with NO BUFFER TIME. This schedule wouldonly be reasonable if every?diing' were to go perfectly to plan, and no unforeseen delays were to occur- Also, all of the schedules assume a reasonable solution will be. discovered to JCl?s temp sensor location and CDC personnel will be available to constantly walk through and approve work as it happens. Also, all of the schedules assume a ?pencil? report will be suf?cient for CDC approval. We have not included time for a full report to-be created while the lab would be shut down. Please let me know if we can do anything else to help. Thanks, Avery Wood IV E. 3230 RPeachtrec Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 678 966 0094 Work ms om: omn Fax Cell Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 5:19 PM To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Co: Probst, Paul E. Mickle, Lenore (CDCIOCOOIPGO) Subject: Re: P2009453 Construction Schedule Meeting Minutes Temperature setpoint will be adjustable via 0W8. From: Moss, Karen To: 'Averv Wood Ungler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. owillist?lwillismechcom Mickie, Lenore (CDCIDCOUIPGD) Sent: Fri May 14 16:21:36 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Schedule Meeting Minutes Avery, A couple of comments: OHS smoke test to be performed after all Th8 adjustments are made, after initial test is done, I might have some comments that will require additional adjustments. I want work finalized before OHS does their smoke test. Sensor or temperature probe will control new HW Control Valve and both shall send a signal to BAS. Ken, does BAS just monitor or have the capability of make adjustments? Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-El'r? Mantar Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770?438-330? Cell: 4046254382? Fax: 270?483?266? email: {wodceov From: Avery Wood IV Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 3:59 PM To: Moss, Karen Lingier, Arthur R. Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. gwillis@wiilismech.com: Mickie, Lenore Subject: P2009453 Construction Schedule Meeting Minutes Karen, AIL, .b'n3'242 us cg See attached minutes from today's scheduling meeting on the reject. Please let -- know if 1 left anything out. Thanks, Avery Wood IV Willis Mechanical 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle GA 30092 678 966 0094 Work ?79 Fax Cell From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 5:22 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. nwillis@willismech.cnm; Subject: P2009453 Construction Schedule Karen Mass RE. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday. May 14, 2010 4:22 PM To: rAvery Wood Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Walpole: Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Mickie. Lenore (CDCJOCOOIPGO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Schedule Meeting Minutes AveryI A couple of comments: OHS smoke test to be performed after all adjustments are made after initial test is done, I might have some comments that will require additional adjustments. i want T8. work finalized before OHS does their smoke lest. Sensor or temperature probe will control new HW Control Valve and both shall send a signal to BAS. Ken. does BAS just monitor or have the capability of make adjustments? Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Will?430830? Cell: 404325-632? Fax: 73704-433256? erI'I ail: KMossl @Qdcgo From: Avery Wood IV Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 3:59 PM To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Mickie, Lenore (CDCIOCOOIPGO) Subject: P2009453 Construction Schedule Meeting Minutes Karen, Art, See attached minutes from today?s scheduling meeting on the know if I left anything out. Thanks, Avery Wood IV 1 Wiliis' Maugham-cat Incorporated 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 6?8 966 0094 Work 678 966 9420 Fax cw USE reject. Plea-se- 1eLme2aiIr. . From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 5:22 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. gwillis@willismech.com; aygg?g?gwilligmechcom Subject: P20G9453 Construction Schedule Karen Moss P.E. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Avery Wood IV Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 3:59 PM To: Moss, Karen Lingier, Arthur R. Ce: Walpole, Kenneth K. Probet, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFO): gwiliie@williemech.com; Mickie, Lenore (CDCIOCOOIPGO) Subject: P2009453 Construction Schedule Meeting Minutes (bugmg Attachments: Avery Wood 946 CDC u. .0. 2622: Meeting Minutes 5-14.pdf Karen ArtSee attached mmutes from today's schedulmg mee?ung on the I 5 al PIOJBDL Please let me know if I left anything out. Thanks, Avery Wood IV 1- Willis Mechanical incorporated 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Noreross, GA 3009?. 678 966 0094 Work 678 966 9420 Fax From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 5:22 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. gwillis@wiliismech.eom: awood@willi5mech.com Subject: P2009453 Construction Schedule Karen Moss RE. Willis Mechanical incorporated Construction Schedule Meeting Minutes at; 252;- mi wan lob 946 Date: May 14, 2010 Attendees: Karen Mess - CDC Art Lingler CDC Ken Walpole- CDC Paul Probst - CDC Grant Willis Willis Mechanical Avery Wood Willis Mechanical I Equipment pricing should not include a quick ship option if we are to use the January start date. The revised schedule will be based on 7 work days per week during the shutdown period. 0 BAS will not control Bubble Tight Dampers. They should be manuallyr operated. BAS scope will include an air flow meterng station to monitor air flow. I BAS will control new HW Control Value on HW Coil. - BAS currently has 2 air ?ow settings, minimum and maximum flow. Currently only maximum flow is used. 0 BAS scope summaryr was sent to C1. the message will be forwarded to WMI - For pricing purposes, WMI should assume 16? duct and 1.5? HW piping. - OHS Deeon time should remain at 3 days. i The fan failure test that was performed by CDC. revealed the 3? design static pressure could not be maintained but the fan could hold the area at 2? SP. The Wild contractor will need to adjust the sheave on the fans to compensate. . . . a :42 useBAS scope includes adding a temp sensor in the lib-innit Field investigation determine if this is possible. If not possible, temp probe in exhaust duct will he used. 0 Karen will keep Willis Mechanical informed of all vendor/subcontractor communication. I Installation of MMA floorin cove base material will have to be during weekend work. A Friday afternoon w0uld be best. Can exhaust be used to exhaust fumes? 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Nor-cross. GA 30092 Phone: (61'819663094 Fax: (613)966-942? Email: Website: mvw.willisnrech.corn w' Willis Mechanical Incorporated ?Dudek? (Spelling?) paint may be speci?ed. CDC submittal review should be shown as 10 days on the schedule. Fan failure test and OHS smoke test could both be performed in one day durations. OHS smoke test (1 day duration) should be performed after initial test. Walk through willbe performed continuously throughout the construction process and should be shown concurrent with ?nal adjustments. CDC is scanning the slabs to determine the best location for slab openings. Paul asked if CDC could review a preliminary test 8r. balance report at the conclusion of the field testing in order to reduce the overall duration. WMI to follow up with TAB Services to determine if this would he possible. WMI to provide both a best case schedule and a more conservative schedule to CDC for review. CDC will meet Thursday 5:20 to discuss schedule. WMI and CDC will meet Wednesday 5! 19 at 10:00am to discuss revised schedule. 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Narcross. GA 30092 Phone: Fax: (67819659420 Email: gwillis?willismgb com Website: Chester 42 IBEarlr- From: Sent: To: Cc: ?i?j?fect: .. Matt, The following BAS scope of work will be performed in conjunction with theVivarium-Air-Reversal Walpole, Kenneth (CDCIOCODIEFO) Wednesday, May 12, 2010 9:27 AM 'Matthew.S.Musheno jci.com' Paul E. Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Vivarium Air Reversal Project - BAS Market Survey 4.2" US I: 5. forwarding this bootleg copy to you directly in order to provide you with a head start on the market survey. Willis will be serving as the prime contractor on this project and this scope will be passed along to them. Be advised this represents the minimum scope .101 would probably asked to execute on this project and Willis may request you perform additional items. Please provide myself 8: Willis with the results of your market survey by NLT COB next Tuesday 05H 8. Thanks, Ken 3115 Scope of Work 1. Furnish and install DDC instrumenteti temp sensor to be installed in Corridor ard controls for new reheat coil. Instrumentation shall include new space (location TBD) and pneumatic hot water valve (assume Corridor is subject to wash down so space temp sensor must be waterproof. Furnish and install new AFS in 16" supply duct to monitor air flow performance of new phoenix air valve. Assume air valve will be furnished by Willis. AFS manufacturer shall match existing. New instrumentation may be interfaced with existing DDC controllers if spare capacity is suf?cient. Scope of work will also include HW 3; SW engineering, commissioning, and interfacing new devicesicontrols with existing PMI database and M5 graphics. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 10. 2010 8:58 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Cc: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject P2009453 Controls scope Ken, For our conversation Friday Control Scope of work: Water proof sensor to modulate reheat coil to maintain space temp. Phoenix valve - constant Volurne with air flow mealering station to send sicnal to BAG control panel -- - -- Ilnterface VFD to maintain duct static pressure. System shall be capable of quick response time. Fan failure test to verify response time. Existing bypass damper controls to be disabled 1 will work on a formal sequence and send to you this week. We then need to meet with Johnson controls for pricing and to Iverify construction length of time before the next HOG meeting. Regards. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Represe ntatiue Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 710-433-330? Cell: 404-825-5827 Fax: TFO4BE-2567 email: Mathe, Chester (cocrocooioseri) From: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 11:52 AM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Subject: FW: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, May 20,r 2010 11:36 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCKOCOUIBFO) Subject: and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Your Per our meeting on May 19. it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the final design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, our position is are optional. Based on the Test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditiOns. OHS has determined that there were no major issues of reversal of air flow in the areas. The only area of concern was the areas furthest away from the exhaust fan. The issues in these areas were phoenix valves operating close to their min DP operating ranges. However, this problem may.r be improved upon or worsened depending on the ?nal design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O?ice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F04 Atlanta, GA 30333 O??ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 4045912599 55 P195259 wander r/Je erzeemmaem? believe prierz'rgg as earns.? Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday. May 20, 2010 11:02 AM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 George, I need to discuss this with you. Ken From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 10:21 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCKOCOOIBFD) Cc: Prolost, Paul E. Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 KenI See below from P60. I would like to have the control cost for the VFD's in the project?s even though we aren?t sure we will proceed this way; we would at least have the cost to present to PGO. Will you please have Craig give us a control cost for VFD scenario? have the cost of the ?v'FD's and the associated electrical cost. Thank you, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ?it'd-430E130? car: 404-325-082? Fax: mesa?zest em all: [(131055 {?nd Hello KarenI Can you please give me a ballpark figure for the By chance, do you have an initial you can share? ask because i need to submit a letter to the SBA and get the project on their radar screen. and a price range is required (even a range would be good). i realize you are still formulating the requirement package. Thanks, 3m CDC, Procurement and Grants Office Buildings and Facilities Contracts Branch Phone: WEI-4884623 Fax: 7?0-488-2847 Mikl d.v This e-mail and any files transmitted with it contain US. Government information that is OFFICIAL USE or other types of SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED information requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure. All information is confidential, intended solely for the addressee and shall be disseminated only on a TO basis. To provide feedback on your recent experiences with PGO. email Feedback will be used to improve business services. Maths, Chester From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) I Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 10:21 AM To: Walpole. Kenneth K. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Daniels. Charles E. Subject: P2009453 . Ken. See below from P60. I would like to have the control cost fer the VFD's in the project's IGE even though we aren?t sure we will proceed this way; we would at least have the cost to present to PGO. Will you please have Craig give us a control cost for VFD scenario? I have the cost of the and the associated electrical cost. Thank you, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1000 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 404?025-502? Fax; Nil?4332567 email: Hello Karen, . Can you please give me a ballpark figure for the By chance. do you have an initial IGE you can share? ask because I need to submit a letter to the SBA and get the project on their radar screen, and a price range is required (even a range would be good). I realize you are still formulating the requirement package. Thanks. 3mm CDC. Procurement and Grants Office Buildings and Facilities Contracts Branch Phone: 7?0e438-2623 Fax: Nil-4884847 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it contain US. Government information that is OFFICIAL USE or other types of SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED information requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure. All information _is confidential, intended solely for the addressee and shall be disseminated only on a TO basis. To provide feedback on your recent experiences with PEG. email PGO-Commentsf?zcdco?. Feedback will he used to improve business services. rcocrocooroses') From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 24. 2010 T22 AM To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Raymond, George Bowen. Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Walpole. Kenneth K. b, Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) .. .. . anfium Const' Sane,de All: The construction schedules as presented by Willis Mechanical were presented at the HOG on Thursday. It was noted to the HOG Team that Willis had developed Best and Worst Case scenarios regarding shutdown durations, and that those windows were 22 days and 35 days respectively. it was also noted that the earliest that the work could begin was November 15?. I Based on TB program input, the start date of November 1 has no ?exibility me earlier. (TBI he could vacate the space no earlier than November 15?. Laura Zambuto Immwis where she will move her operation to during of the V'varium. However, mid-November represen 2523'?: Haf?s?f thescbeduied annualsh utdown of the lab. OHS, Ibis? I expressed the desire to have the project occur as soon as possible as the currently opera mg scenario is undesirable relative to the proposed changes. Laura indicated later in the day, outside of the meeting, that she would be open to the possibility of having the shag-33 5 shutdown prematurely occur in September to clear the way for the November 1 start. Her proposal is currently under consideration. Regards. Paul Probst Marthe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFW Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 ?:53 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Raymond, George Walpole, Kenneth Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO(CDCIOCODIBFO) Subject: Lilac; learlum Const. Schedule November 15t start date is much better than a January 3I11 start date. Thanks to All, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-639-3303 Of?ce 40443390499 Fax From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 ?:22 AM To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. Walpole, Kenneth K. Daniels, Charles E. Subject (3)42 Vivarium Coast. Schedule All: The construction schedules as presented by Willis Mechanical were presented at the HOG on Thursday. It was noted to the HOG Team that Willis had developed Best and Worst Case scenarios regarding shutdown durations, and that those windovrs Were 22 days and 35 days respectively. It was also noted that the earliest that the work could begin was November 15. Based on TB program input, the start date of Novembert has no flexibility me earlier. (TB I 5% i he could vacate the space no earlier than November 15?. Laura Za I - - I indicated-that ?gs; W, a is Eyvhsere she will move her operation to of th - member-represents th?zailu lzs'eiridati? "of the lab. OHS, Bill Howard, expressed the desire to have the project occur as soon as possible as the currently operating scenario is undesirable relative to the proposed changes. in}: :12 was Laura indicated later in the day, outside of the meeting, that she would be open to the possibility of having them- shutdown prematurely occur in September to clear the way for the November start. Her proposal is currently under consideration. Regards, Paul Probst (cocrocoorosem From: Moss. Karen Sent: Thursday. May 20, 2010 4:50 PM To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. WalpoleI Kenneth K. Probat, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Co: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOGOOIBFO) Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The intent is to give a preliminary IGE to PGG to give them an order of magnitude of the cost of the project. i would prefer to err a little on the high side rather than the low. Thanks for your input George, I will use your number of$20,000 for any controls cost (which I assume include cost, installation and programming] associated with 2 thD's. Final IGE will be presented upon ?nal design documents. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 77?0-488-830? Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: 3?30-488e266? email: KMossl@cdc.gov Message?"? From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:50 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 I think things are getting lost in Email Translation. The email that Karen 5th to Ken had nothing to do with my email below. My email below is only a follow-up to the agreements and action items following our meeting on yesterday. In reference to the email that Karen forwarded on to Ken from Lenore Mickie, PGO only requested a "ballpark ?gure" and a "price range" for the overall IGE for this project. If you are adding in the price for the VFD's for "worst case", you can use the following: $10,000 (2 at 5K each} Electrical $20,000 Controls $20,000 Total for VFD Add is between Ball park. However, as stated below, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope of this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. For that matter, you cannot attempted to come-up with and IGE until you have an agreed upon scope and preliminary design- George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, NW, MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Of?ce: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Danie?Is, Charles Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth'i?c'EI Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost andfor misunderstood in the e-mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that has been accompIishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGO with a detailed IGE up?front. Lenore Mickie requested the IGE in an e-mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something I'm sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, and we will re?visit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst-case estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail (as is often my problem}. Anyway, I believe she needs someone's OK in FMEO to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the e?mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop K-96 Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 770488-8105 Cell: 404-444-6281 e-mail: TBIanchard@cdc.gov Message-?-- From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth Probst, Paul E. 2 Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the ?nal design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FM ED's position is are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Of?ce: 404-539-3335 Cell: 404-592-2599 Fax: 404-639-1685 Email: ghr5@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, May 20. 2010 3:18 PM To: Blanchard. Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Raymond, George Danieia, Charles Walpole. Kenneth K. Probst, PauiE. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Tom, Thank you. My intent was exactly as you stated below to present to PGD the worst case cost scenario. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. M5 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-438-830? Cell: 400-825-6827 Fax: ?70-488-2667 email: KMoslecdcgov -?d-Original Message--??- From; Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost and/or misunderstood in the e-mail translation. 1 think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project byhaving to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGD with a detailed IGE up?front. Lenore Mickle requested the IGE in an e?mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is: accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides ofthe issue, re: keep the damper?plenum vs. and we wil[ re-visit the issue when design parameters are available. 'Karen is simply trying to present a worstucase estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail [as is often my problem). Anyway, I believe she needs someone's 0K in FMED to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the e?mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop K-96 Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 7?0-d88?8105 Cell: 404-444?5231 e-rnail: TBlanchard @cdc.gov ?rs-Original Message--?-- From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the ?nal design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FMEO's position is are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention FM E0 Of?ce: 404-539-3335 Cell: 404-59??2599 Fax: 4404-6327-1685 Email: ghr?chcgov Mail stop: Mathe, Chester From: Matthew.S.Musheno@jci.com Sent: Wednesday, May19, 2010 11:4? AM To: Walpol 'meth K. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) tottsi?ul?est; . .. .sz-Bld ivarium Air Reversal 'ect? BAS I smeabhments: Microsoft Word - coc Roybal 1.5.pdf Avery mentioned Grant's architectural sub has not told them how long to build the cmu I think that may be the hold up. We responded within an hour of being asked the scheduling questions this am. Forwarded by Matthew MushenoiNNJohnson_Controls on 05!19t2010 11:45 AM Fro m: Matthew MushenoiNNJohnsoLConlrots To; hkajt?cdcnov Date: 05t19l20 1:43 AM F-w: Bidg?'ivarium Air Reversal Project - HAS Market Survey _a Hey Kareanen, just an Avery contacted me this morning was concerned about the schedule - i just spent the last hour going over the project with craig and every and lined out the milestones. I sent this email to document that schedule. Forwarded by Matthew on 05f191'2010 11:39 AM um From: Matthew MushenoINNJohnsoLControis To; ?AventWWood cawood willismechxome Cc: "'Grant Willis? egwiilisfgwillismechoome, Craig 0 Avery WWood sawood wii ?srn Malthew Weia songControls Date: 05!19t2010 1 AM {mgi?zo a Ivariom Air Reversal Project - BAS Market Sum'ejrr We had a call with Avery this AM to go over the schedule. See my notes on page 2. Kind Regards, Matthew S. Musheno Johnson Controls, inc. 1 350 Northmeadow Parkway, Suite 100 Roswell, GA 30076 mobile (7'70) 241-3286 From: "everyI Wood eawood wiliisrnecheome To: Cc: a h. om:- Date: 05i19i2010 09:12 AM "?E'i'FWf'Btd lvarium Air Reversal Project - HAS Market Survey Matt. Your add price said 9 days worth of work, is that 9 days total, 9 days during shutdown. or what? Please give me a call as soon as possible. I need to get our revised shutdown schedule put together for a meeting at 11:30 today. Thanks. Averyr Wood IV 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 678 966 0094 Work . Fox I I Call From: Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 5:24 PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) -, -..- Avery Wood ivarium Air Reversal Project - BAS Market Survey (blt3li Ken. I made the changes and produced this market survey. I will run all this by Craig Bellflower for any ?ne tuning tomorrow. Kind Regards. Matthew S. Musheno Johnson Controls, Inc. 1350 Northmeadow Parkway. Suite 100 Roswell. GA 30076 mobile 070} 241-3286 hem 'Walpole, Kenneth K. . atlhew Dale: 05f19i2010 '1 1:35 AM- FW: Blng?va?um Air Reversal Project - BAS Market Survey . .. . ?33(6) Wehad acall with rlhis AM to go over the schedule. See my notes on page 2. Kind Regards, Matthew S. Musheno Johnson Controls. Inc. 1350 Northmeadow Parkway. Suite 100 (entail . From: "Avery 1I.r"1."ood cawo To: > From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, Juli;I 02, 2010 8:42 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: P2009453 (b)(3)142 Kent ?8 Do you have the sequence of control for fan The control sequence on the drawings is not up to date. Thanks in advance for your help Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention DeSIgn Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-Q7 Atlanta. Georgia 30333 "ll-Le;- 43-83307 in? rain-527 i in 25-37 email l\\l-ml It'd: gm -N deaf-Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 12:52 PM To: Raymond. George (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Cc: Daniels. Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFC) Subject: RE: P2009453 George, Thank you for the information. The sansorl saw in the exhaust duct in the interstitial sends a signal to the supply air handler? arn hesitant to set a ?rm date for this meeting as we are having issues with the results that came back from the testing company that ran a GPR on the slab. i left Paul a voice mail this morning to discuss. However, ifyou would like i will set up a meeting for the . Best Regards. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS ?tlanta1 Georgia 30333 U.S.C. 26 Of?ce: noses-seer n: 404-325-532? FEE email: U.S.C. I 262a(h) 42 'gFrom: Raymond, George (CDCKOCOOKBFO) Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 12:40 PM (blt3)142 26 fro: Moss, Karen Co: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCODIBFO) .3 Subject: RE: P2009453 Karen, was mistaken in my last response. The static pressure for exhaust fan :Iis control from the sensor located i the roof. There are three sensors located on the interstitial space. These sensors are used determine a loss of exhaust air flow. Hope this clears up some of your confusion. 1 would still like to set a firm date for this review. How does Tuesday 27?? sound. During this meeting we would like to discuss the commissioning activities for the project. Please respond to Paul Probst on the con?rmed meeting date. If there is anything FMEO can do to help you tie down this meeting date, we are more than happy to assist. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 3:49 PM To: Raymond, George Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 George, 1 need someone to tell me what type of sensor is in the duct on the roof and what it?s function is. We will make sure we get a review scheduled before documents are sent to P60. I am not at a point where I can tie down a date to meet. Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 "i stile-EEC"? iI 4'14 77-; Small knit?! gm From: Raymond, George (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:41 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: P2009453 I'm not 100% sure about the high pressure cut off. In a conversation with Roman, there is no high pressure cutoff on the exhaust fans in 13. I am sure that the static pressure is controlled in the interstitial. in a conversation with Charles Daniels, DEMO will not be providing a design with traditional drawing and a speci?cation. Instead the project will be executed as a SOC. This allows the contractor to proceed with the project with a general narrative and an understanding of the customers expectation. I mention to Charles that if this is going to be a SOC and since there will not be any design documents. we need to have a ?nal review with OHS. DEMO. FMEO and Willis mechanical to make sure we all understand the scope of work that Willis will be performing. I'm not sure if this review is included in the schedule that you ?nalized with Willis mechanical. non the less, we need to have a review before the project gets forwarded on to P60. The original schedule called for a 30 review starting on June 30, We all agree that a 30 day review is not needed. Per Charles the project is scheduled to go to P60 on August 1. Can we meet the week of July 19 to perform a ?nal review of the project scope before it goes to George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Of?ce: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404639-1685 Err l: ghr6@cdo.gov stop: F-04 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODJBFO) To: Raymond, George Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Fri Jul 09 11:13:15 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 George, The purpose of this e-mail is to confirm our conversation yesterday. We retrieved the Johnson Shop Drawing Control Drawings off the server. The duct static pressure sensor that controls the modulating bypass damper is believed to be I interstial space not at the roof. You believe the probe at the roof to be a duct pressure sensor (bll3l342 if duct pressure increases too much; however this is not mention in the control sequence neds verified. lbtl3li42 sac- 26 The makeup damper is the same thing as the modulating bypass damper. T818 to accomplish. Best Regs rd 5. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ss-ssor Cell: 404?825-682? Fax: email: KMussl @cdcgov From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 12:4? PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: RE: P2009453 Ken, Thank you for the sequence. I have a couple of questions. This sequence states that outside air bypass damper #1 will modulate to maintain plenum static pressure set point. As far as i know there is not static pressure sensor in the plenum; is that correct? Also. I saw a static pressure probe in the duct . on the roofwhere the TtsEi person was taking measurements for fan failure test. have also noticed a static pressure 3 sensor located in the exhaust duct at the interstitial level where it turns before it goes up to the roof. Do you what the two static pressure sensors do"? Exactly which sensor controls the modulating bypass damper? . This sequence describes a makeup air damper. I am not aware of a makeup air damper. Do you know If this exists and where it is? The sequence states that if a pair of exhaust fans fail the BAS will shut down its respective AHU and the static pressure set point shall be 35% of active static pressure set point and that set point to be determined by the system balancer. Is this what we want test and balance to accomplish? Regards. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce Cell 404-825-682? Fax emall? ticitc gm- From: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 9:29 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: RE: P2009453 File: EF1721-Seqof0ps.pdf From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 8:42 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: P2009453 Ken. Do you have the sequence of control for fans 3 :42 US The control sequence on the drawings is not up to date. Thanks in advance for your help. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta Georgia 30333 Office 771488-8307 "ell 404-535-632? Fax Nil-4832657 email moneys Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 4:01 PM To: Raymond, George Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole. Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 I want to thank everyone for their involvement in the review of this issue. Per our meeting on it was agreed thatVFD will not be used on this project. The completion date of 6f30f2010, for the 90% construction documents, was also discussed. Karen stated that she was not sure if that was still a good date. We have a 30 day review period for the documents, and it was agreed by all that we may not need the full 30 days. We should be ok if the completion ofthe construction documents slips by a couple of days or a week. However, this is a milestone in making sure we meet the shutdown dates that have been committed to the programs. Karen, if you will, please provide an updated schedule as to when the construction document will be complete. Message-m- From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:57 PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. l:r'ilalpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Thanks Karen, As mentioned below, we need to meet again to put the VFD issue to rest. 1 would like to make this a working session to make surewe are all on board with the design approach and an explanation to the increase in CFMs when the air change rate has decreased. Everyone, please check your schedule for Tuesday 6/8/2010 in the Building 20 2nd floor conference room at 8:00am. Message--?-- From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:15 PM To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The estimated exhaust airflow is 17,855 CFM (12,163 current) at an estimated external static pressure drop of 2.8 current} inches W.C. The calculation included reducing the air change rate from 15 to 12. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: ??0-438?8307 Cell: 404325-6327 Fax: 220-488?2667 email: KMossl?cdc.gov Message-m- Frorn: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 3:36 PM To: Raymond, George Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Any update on a date you will know the total CFM required by the exhaust fans? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Message-m- From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:00 PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Re: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 You are welcome. Keep in mind that this is a "Ball Park" only. Also, FMED does not support the use of VFD for this application, for reason we discussed during our meeting on yesterday. However, per Our agreement during yesterdays, meeting we are willing to revisit this issue once ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. In order to put the VFD issue'to rest, will you know the total exhaust and supply CFM design (CFM only) within the next couple of weeks? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-59??2599 Fax: 404-639-1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 Original Message From: Moss, Karen To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Thu May 20 16:49:55 2010 Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009153 The intent is to give a preliminary IGE to P60 to give them an order ofmagnitude of the cost of the project. I would prefer to err a little on the high side rather than the low. Thanks for your input George, will use your number of $20,000 for any controls cost (which I assume include cost, installation and programming} associated with 2 VFD's. Final IGE will be presented upon final design documents. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-488-8307 Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: 370-438-266? email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:50 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: UFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 I think things are getting lost in Email Translation. The email that Karen sent to Ken had nothing to do with my email below. My email below is only a follow-up to the agreements and action items following our meeting on yesterday. In reference to the email that Karen forwarded on to Ken from Lenore Mickie, PGO only requested a ?ballpark figure" and a "price range" for the overall IGE for this project. lfyou are adding in the price forthe VFD's for "worst case", you can use the following: VFD's $10,000 (2 at 5K each) Electrical $20,000 Controls $20,000 Total for VFD Add is between SBOK-SSOK Ball park. However, as stated below, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope of this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. For that matter. you cannot attempted to come-up with and until you have an agreed upon scope and preliminary design. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, MS: Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst. Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost andlor misunderstood in the e-mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide P60 with a detailed IGE up-front. Lenore Mickie requested the IGE in an email that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something l'm sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, and we will revisit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst-case estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail. but not everyone writes a book when sending an email (as is often my problem]. Anyway. I believe she needs someone?s 0K in FMEO to solicit that estimate from J0 and sent the e-mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop K-96 Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 770-488-8105 Cell: 404-444-6281 e-mail: TBlanchard@cdc.gov Message?uh From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paui E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow?up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on Mai,r 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the final- design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FM position is VFD's are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. LGeorge K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention E0 Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: Fax: 404-639-1635 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 7:15 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: ACH Rate Kenl'George: This looks like the next big issue to keep this project from progressing. Ken, based on input from Koob, which may or may not be valid today, a reduction in supply air will present problems addressing the heat gain within the space. What kind of trend data on temperature and reheat coil valve position can we get on the animal holding rooms? Would be interesting to compare those being used to those unoccupied. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Hyatt, Ted D. (CDCIOCUOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 6:54 AM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: ACH Rate 1. The reduced ACH rates are approved by OHS for all future design considerations. "This is not a test.? Agree that vivarium ACH rates are dictated by but are acceptable at12r13. When we push to the upper end of 15 ACH, it is simply wasting energy. 3. We have calculated ACH on exhaust flow rate for animal holding areas through many years of successful inspections. This was never questioned by the inspection teams. Again, erring on the side of calculating from supply flow rates is simply wasting energy. 5. The 150 offset includes a safety margin of 149 cfm. But the real offset can be calculated by taking the margin of measurement errors, both supply and exhaust, and determining a comfort level of no overlap. i.e. if the necessary supply is 500 cfm, a typical TAB error would be or 25 cfm. If you use the standard 150 offset to get 650 exhauat, this error would be about 33 cfm. If the actual supply is high, at 525 cfm, and the actual exhaust is low at 617 cfm, this still provides a 92 offset. More than adequate. Where you really have to look at the offset is with much higher flow rates, when the errors can cause an overlap of simply with exhaust greater than the typical 150 cfm. Tad Hyer! Assn Diva, Fill-{E0 FSE COTR 404.639.0329 From: Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 4:3? PM To: Hyatt, Ted D. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Rate Gentlemen. {?08142 I - .. 2523:?) There are several mitigating factors with respect to the air flow rates of the Bidg Vivarium. These factors are listed below and may answer some of your questions: 1. I thought the reduced air change rate was still in a ?test mode." My impression was thatroject was still part of that test. Further, is not the same as a vivariumfanimal holding area. There are considerations, regardless of whether we want to reduce air change rates or not. Have we consulted the HOG, OHS, AR - LAC. etc. with regard to reducing airflows in animal holding areas? I would have thought theEildg' I ivarium would be st place we'd reduce airflow rates until absolutely certain that they wilt work. (My information says that Bldgis also set to 15 ACH in the vivarium.) 2. current standards (Gw?de forms Care and Use of Laboratory Animate. 1996 ed.) call for 10-15 fresh air changes for laboratory animal holding areas, while some of own reference resources state as high as 15-20. 3. Note that the AMLAC standards make specific reference to "fresh air" changes. Air from an adjacent contaminated area (animal prepfprocedure room or dirty corridor) is not ?fresh air." Supply air will dictate the air changes of fresh air and will be the lower number in Karen?s calculations for the animal holding rooms. 4. Supply air needed to meet the heat load in the animal holding room approaches 500 cfm, anyway. I believe Karen?s proposed supply air ?ow rate is 510 cfrn. 5. Ted has con?rmed that 150 is needed to maintain differential pressure across a door threshold. Please note that "differential pressure" was not a reference to some ?pressurization? requirement. Differential pressure between areas is what causes directional airflow. In any event.'she is using approximately 150 per door with another ~50 for a safety factor. In my humble opinion, an extra 50 is a prudent measure, considering the criticality involved and the fact that we're completely reversing flows relative to the original design and present conditions. So, ifsupply air is ?600 cfm, then exhaust is 500 {150 2) 50 850 cfm. This is what she reported this morning. Thomas M. Blanchard, P. E. Eluifdings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Cfi?on Rd. NE, Mai! Slop Atlanta. GA 30333 Phone: Nil-488-8?fd5 Gaff: 404444-6281 e-maff: TBfanchard@ co'c. gov From: Hyatt, Ted D. Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 12:55 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Blanchard, Thomas M. Cc: Raymond, George Subject: RE: ACH Rate Air change rates have always been calculated from the higher value, which is almost always the exhaust since our labs are almost always negative. .. This was agreed upon by OHS eons ago, I believe with the design of buildin in the mid 1990's. Every new lab building design since has done the same. Also. ?Pressurization? is not a BMBL requirement fol only directional airflow. This has ovenrvhelmingly been achieved by differential flows In exhaust and supply cfrn. agreed upon differential has been a minimum of 150 after 100 proved to be an issue occasionally in building ?i . Tar! Hyatt Asst. Bria, F?vaO FSE 404.639.0329 From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 11:26 AM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Cc: Hyatt, Ted D. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Subject: ACH Rate Tom; I understand that George . you spoke regarding air changes per hour. I want to add that, after the meeting, I learned from Ted that the Building airilow reduction project, which is being handled by Reuben, is based on exhaust air flow rate (combined supply and transfer air) for the new revised air change per hour rate calculation. Ted further mentioned that he has always calculated it using exhaust. including reporting. and on Buildin 319-? Paul rails; .12 rays] 42 2523th Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, June UT, 2010 3:41 PM To: Raymond, George Walpole. Kenneth K. Subject: Fw: CDC Bldg. 'i'blfiliwli2 3-0 ?252alhi Suggested reading before meeting tomorrow. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld .. From: Goodin, John To: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Mon Jun 07 15:36:47 2010 . . You will need to read down a few ofthe mails to get the entire story. Basically, Ithink you have a damper issue as much as anything heremun?- a. - Frnm: Goodin, John 53"? Thursday. June 03, 2010 3:33 PM To: Moss, Karen Bldg.,.. . The amps and are proportionately related. I think the formula for 3 phase amps is 3 phase eff. power factor, which may explain some of the differences. Basically, what we did was take the (average amp drawf?o motor FLf-t] 50 Hp to come up with an estimated motor m'easured, and use this to match up with the curve. This gave us the pressure and points on the fan curves. This is all an estimate, as every measurement could be or? so as long as the data relates reasonably to the theoretical curves, we have what we are looking for. Yes, if you cannot test I would concur to replace all dampers, confirm all new dampers are operating properly, test to see where you are at, and then re?sheave, if necessary. John Goodin .s-s-ds- . . m-w From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Thursday, June 03, 201i] PM To: Goodin, John Subject: RE: CDC slag, .. .. . John, 1 got a little different data than you did not that it matters much at this point. We still have too many unknown to size a sheave. When i look at the and on fan curve 1 get much higher PD. than amp draw calculation. Which should supersede? See attached. The original fan schedule called for 21,500 CFM but when added up the connected Phoenix valve off the schedule I got 172460 which might be why they were resheavedj, however is 16,569 at3" just food for thought. Whatever airflow we want in the duct where the static pressure sensor is located is different than what the fan CFM needs to be based on the configuration. i am not sure that can be calculated accurately and probably means field measurement so game plan start with original sheaves and new dampers and set point and see where we are at? Thanks for yoUr help with this. letSl 42 --.25.2athji Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Controi and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Knit? Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce; are 483-330? Cell: 404-825?632? Fax: 3014882665? email; A .?mu From: Goodin, John Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 11:34 AM To: Moss, Karen Karen it is total pressure across the fans. This is estimated based on the and amp draw (bhpi that was determined from the individual measurements. it you cannot do more testing prior to the shut-down to perform the work, I would suggest you plan to replace all dampers and actuators as well. Any sheave adjustments or testing should be done after the dampers are replaced and determined to be functioning properly. If you shut down and find out you have to replace a damper, you may.? not be able to get it in time. MK is pricing the dampers 'and I will forward when I receive. John Goodin From: Moss, Karen igb?lgolf a 5 Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 11:27 AM a? memo a; oodin John 9523M rpm; 42 262mm Suh1ect:..RE: CDC Bldg. John, The SP on these curves is it external er delta With both fans. running delta was -3.13 3.66. We unfortunately did not get a delta with one fan running. guess should have been more specific with and thought through the data would need more thoroughly. At this point. I have been discouraged from running more test now So we wiil have to run more testing as the first item on list when we shutdown. At that point we can determine sheave size. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. l?v?iS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Cell; {tutti-325632? Fax: WG-483-265T email: gov From: Goodin, John Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 11:09 AM ?4055. Karen (CDC OCOO 232a'i'luiguh3ecttcoc Karen I have looked at the data in more detail, and it appears to me that there is likely an issue with the dampers on this system. I have attached fan curves and sketches which represent the data taken on 5/10. Withl -- d-cata (fan outlet vs. fan inlet] is very close to the theoretical expectation, only a 3.6% difference. With Fan -- ,off. the measured data shows a large difference, The fan outlet data and curves were determined using the amp draw and measured for each fan. This field data is usually pretty reliable, and it appears in this case to relate very welt to the theoretical curves. If you recall, running. This would indicate a large amount of air being puiled through the fan and back draft damper 3334-?? The theoretical data seems to confirm this as the plenum pressure would be less in this situation, and the fan would pull more air and thus more amps at the same rpm. All this points to a possible problem with the back draft damper forfan $3221 FThe data when both fans are running also seems to support a possible back draft damper problem. The pressure in the duct increases by with both fans running. tin-[3' .-1 .202th From-the data we now have, it is difficult to provide a suggested fan speed for both fans with a large degree of confidence. I would suggest that more testing be done before we recommend any sort of sheave change The testing would involve pressure readings at the fan inlets, plenum, and ductwork with each fan running individually, as well as airflow in the and through the bypass dampers and motoramp draw and line leg voltage (voltage did not appear to be measured during the 5-10 test). A thorough inspection ofthe back draft dampers and control dampers should also'be done. The back draftdampers are counter-balanced type, and it is possible that the weight may not be functioning properly and needs repair or adjustment. The back draft dampers can be accessed through the modulating bypass damper/access door. The control dampers should be checked to make certain the actuators are stroking properly and shutting the dampers completely when commanded. Some manual method of blocking the dampers may also be required, particularly the back draft dampers if they cannot be shut. This testing should confirm the original data and provide a more accurate picture of how the system should operate?with all components functioning properly. The data should also provide a more consistent starting point from which we can more accurately advise a sheave change to increase the duct pressure to the desired It may also show that a relativer easy back draft damper adjustment/repair will result in better system performance, and eliminate the need and expense oftotal damper replacement. Please adviseifadditional testing is possible, and a suggested date. Thanks John Goodin From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 1:54 PM mire-:42 Eros gGODdll'i, John 262th; subject: . .. John, My calculated is 1?,855 the external static pressure I need 'is please run selection with this fan thanks Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1000 Ciitton Road ME. ME: Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Oi?ce: Cell; 404?825-682? Fax: email: KMossl @cdcgov .. .- From: Goodin, .?lohn Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 11:52 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO Subject: CDC mist-:42 c: seesaw. Karen I spoke to Chris German, and he was helpful in explaining the operation of the Phoenix valves at low pressures, however, there is still some concern about the measurements taken in early May. it would seem to be logical that the system should be completely evaluated to determine what the requirements need to be at this point in time. This would involve determining the airflow required both in and out of the spaces, calculating the pressure loss in the system from furthest point up to the fan inlet plenum, calculating the dirty filter losses, and calculating the min. pressure for the Phoenix valves to control properly. The airflow and the pressure calculated would determine the duct set point required. This could then be confirmed {or not) by actual field measurement of the system. The new requirements ofthe tans (rpm) would be determined from this information. By doing the calculations, we would get a better idea of how the system is intended to perform, which will aid everyone in determining what action should be taken regarding re-sheaving the fans. John W. Goodin Atlanta Branch Manager Torn Barrow Companv P: 404-605-355? F: 404-350-9121 C: igoodin?ltombarrowcom Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, June AM To: Moss, Karen Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniele, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Karen: Can you forward the revised air balance diagram for review prior to tomorrow's meeting? Thanks, Paul 404?639-0505 --?--Original From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 3:07 PM To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCXOCOOKBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 If ACH rate had stayed the same the exhaust CFM would have been much greater, lower ACH rate means lower air quantity however the pressure differential went up so the differential (TM is greater. Karen Moss Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: ??0-488?8307 Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: ?70?483-2667 email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:5? PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Thanks Karen, As mentioned below, we need to meet again to put the UFO issue to rest. I would like to make this a working session to make sure we are all on board with the design approach and an explanation to the increase in CFMs when the air change rate has decreased. Everyone, please check your schedule for Tuesday 6/8/2010 in the Building 20 2nd floor conference room at 8:00am. Message?-? From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:15 PM To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The estimated exhaust airflow is 17,855 CFM {17,163 current) at an estimated external static pressure drop of 2.8 current) inches W.C. The calculation included reducing the air change rate from 15 to 12. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS K-97 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-488-8307 Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: 77041384567 email: KMossl@cdc.gov ?-?--0rigina From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 3:36 PM To: Raymond, George Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Any update on a date you will know the total CFM required by the exhaust fans? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 2 Message--?-- From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:00 PM - To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Re: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P20092153 You are welcome. Keep in mind that this is a "Ball Park" only. Also, FMEO does not support the use of VFD for this application, for reason we discussed during our meeting on yesterday. However, per our agreement during yesterdays, meeting we are willing to revisit this issue once finaldesign for the total required CFM has been determined. In order to put the VFD issue to rest, will you know the total exhaust and supply CFM design (CFM only] within the next couple of weeks? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-SQT-2599 Fax: 404-639-1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-Cidl Original Message From: Moss, Karen (cocxocoO/aroi To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Thu May 20 16:49:55 2010 Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The intent is to give a preliminary IGE to PGD to give them an order of magnitude of the cost of the project. I would prefer to err a little on the high side rather than the low. Thanks for your input George, 1 will use your number of $20,000 for any controls cost (which I assume include cost, installation and programming] associated with 2 VFD's. Final IGE will be presented upon final design documents. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control-and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-483-8307 Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: 770-488-266? email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:50 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 I think things are getting lost in Email Translation. The email that Karen sent to Ken had nothing to do with my email below. My email below is only a follow?up to the agreements and action items following our meeting on yesterday. In reference to the email that Karen forwarded on to Ken from Lenore Mickie, PGO only requested a "ballpark figure" and a ?price range" for the overall IGE forthis project. If you are adding in the price for the VFD's for "worst case", you can use the following: VFD's $10,000 [2 at 5K each) Electrical $20,000 Controls $20,000 Total for VFD Add is between Ball park. However, as stated below, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope of this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. For that matter, you cannot attempted to come-up with and until you have an agreed upon scope and preliminary design. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1585 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-maii From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Prabst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost and/or misunderstood in the e-mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGO with a detailed up-front. Lenore Mickle requested the IGE in an e-mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something I'm sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status ofour meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, and we will revisit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst-case estimate to PGO in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail (as is often my problem}. Anyway, I believe she needs someone's OK in FMEO to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the e-mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop K-QE Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 770-488-8105 Cell: 404-444-5281 email: TBlanchard@cdc.gov- --?--Original Message-?m From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the final design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FMEO's position is are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ODXOCOOXBFOIFMEO Office: 404-539-3335 Cell: 404?59??2599 Fax: 404-639?1585 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday. June 03, 2010 3:07 PM To; Raymond, George Blanchard. Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Prohst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 if ACH rate had stayed the same the exhaust CFM would have been much greater, lower ACH rate means lower air quantity however the pressure differential went up so the differential CFM is greater. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-488-8307 Cell: 404?825-6827 Fax: 770-488-2567 email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Ravmond, George Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:5? PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Thanks Karen, As mentioned below, we need to meet again to put the VFD issue to rest. I would like to make this a working session to make sure we are all on board with the design approach and an explanation to the increase in CFMs when the air change rate has decreased. Everyone, please check your schedule for Tuesday in the Building 20 2nd floor conference room at 3:003m. Message-?--? From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:15 PM To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The estimated exhaust airflow is 17,855 CFM (1?,163 current] at an estimated external static pressure drop of 2.8 current} inches W.C. The calculation included reducing the air change rate from 15 to 12. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1500 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-488-830? Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: email: Klvlossl@cdc.gov Message--?-- From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 3:36 PM To: Raymond, George Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth x. (coc/ocooyeFo); Probst, Paul E. (cocmcoofaFol Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Any update on a date you will know the total CFM required by the exhaust fans? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 5:00 PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 You are welcome. Keep in mind that this is a "Ball Park" only. Also, FMEO does not support the use for this application, for reason we discussed during our meeting on yesterday. However, per our agreement during yesterdays, meeting we are willing to revisit this issue once final design for the total required CFM has been determined. In order to put the VFD issue to rest, will you know the total exhaust and supply CFM design only) within the next couple of weeks? i George K. Raymond 1 Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 404-639?3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404-639-1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: Original Message From: Moss, Karen To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOIBFOJ Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Thu May 20 15:49:55 2010 Subject: RE: and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The intent is to give a preliminary to P60 to give them an order of magnitude ofthe cost ofthe project. I would prefer to err a little on the high side rather than the low. Thanks for your input George, I will use your number of $20,000 for any controls cost (which i assume include cost, installation and programming] associated with 2 VFD's. Final will be presented upon final design documents. Karen Moss RE. I Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770483-8307 . Cell: 404-825-682? i Fax: 770-438-2635? email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Ravmond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:50 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 I think things are getting lost in Email Translation. The email that Karen sent to Ken had nothing to do with my email below. My email below is only a follow-up to the agreements and action items following our meeting on yesterday. In reference to the email that Karen forwarded on to Ken from Lenore Mickie, PGO only requested a "ballpark figure" and a "price range" for the overall IGE for this project. If you are adding in the price for the for "worst case", you can use the following: VFD's $10,000 {2 at 5K each) Electrical $20,000 Controls $20,000 Total for VFD Add is between Ball park. However, as stated below, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope of this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. For that matter, you cannot attempted to come-up with and IGE until you have an agreed upon scope and preliminary design. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, MS: Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost andfor misunderstood in the e-mail translation. i think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGO with a detailed up-front. Lenore Mickle requested the in an e-mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something I'm sure that we all want. She wasn?t trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides ofthe issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, and we will re-visit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst-case estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail (as is often my problem). Anyway, I believe she needs someone's OK in FMEO to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the e?mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buiidings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop Iii?96 Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 770-433-8105 Cell: 404?444-6281 e-mail: TBIanchard@cdc.gov From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM . To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow?up to our meeting on the VFD and Sched tile for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved uponor worsened depending on the final design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the 'v'FDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a final design for the total required has been determined. At this time, FMED's position is are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ED Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-592-2599 Fax: 404-639-1585 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov MaiI stop: F-04 Mathe, Chester (CDCJOCOOIOSEP) From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:5? PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Thanks Karen, As mentioned below, we need to meet again to put the VFD issue to rest. I would like to make this a working session to make sure we are all on board with the design approach and an explanation to the increase in CFMs when the air change rate has decreased. Everyone, please check your schedule for Tuesday in the Building 20 2nd floor conference room at 8:00am. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:15 PM To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOI Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The estimated exhaust airflow is 17,355 {12,163 current] at an estimated external static pressure drop of 41.01- 2.8 current) inches W.C. The calculation included reducing the air change rate from 15 to 12. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE M5 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 720-488-8307 Cell: 404-825-6822? Fax: 770-488-2667 email: KMossl@cdc.gov ??-??Driginal Message~?~?? From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 3:35 PM To: Raymond, George Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Any update on a date you will know the total CFM required by the exhaust fans? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Message--~-- From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:00 PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Re: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 You are welcome. Keep in mind that this is a "Ball Park" only. Also, FMEO does not support the use of VFD for this application, for reason we discussed during our meeting on yesterday. However, per our agreement during yesterdays, meeting we are willing to revisit this issue once final design for the total required CFM has been determined. In order to put the VFD issue to rest, will you know the total exhaust and supply CFM design (CFM only) within the next couple of weeks? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ODIOCOOIBFOIFMEO Of?ce: 404-639?3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404-639-1635 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F04 Original Message From: Moss, Karen To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Thu May 20 16:49:55 2010 Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The intent is to give a preliminary to PGO to give them an order of magnitude of the cost of the project. I would prefer to err a little on the high side rather than the tow. Thanks for your input George, I will use your number of $20,000 for any controls cost (which I assume include cost, installation and programming] associated with 2 VFD's. Final will be presented upon ?nal design documents. 2 Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: ??0-488-8307 Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: ??0v488-2667 email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:50 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 I think things are getting lost in Email Translation. The email that Karen sent to Ken had nothing to do with my email below. My email below is onlyr a follow-up to the agreements and action items following our meeting on yesterday. In reference to the email that Karen forwarded on to Ken from Lenore Mickie, PGO only requested a "ballpark figure" and a "price range" for the overall for this project. if you are adding in the price for the VFD's for "worst case", you can use the following: ?v?FD's $10,000 {2 at 5K each} Electrical $20,000 Controls $20,000 Total for VFD Add is between Ball park. However, as stated below, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope of this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. For that matter, you cannot attempted to come-up with and IGE until you have an agreed upon scope and preliminary design. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 5 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 4045912599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 3 From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. {cocrocoolaroh Probst, Paul E. {CDC/ocoozam) Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost and/or misunderstood in the e-mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGU with a detailed IGE up-front. Lenore Mickle requested the IGE in an e-mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow P60 to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something I'm sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions l've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides ofthe issue, re: keep the damperoplenum vs. VFD's, and we will re-visit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst-case estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail [as is often my problem). Anyway, I believe she needs someone's 0K in FMEO to solicit that estimate from J0 and sent the e-mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop K-BB Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 77048843105 Cell: 404-444?6281 e-mail: TBIanchard @cdc.gov Message-w- From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the UFO and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the final design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the to the scope to this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FMEO's position is are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention E0 Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404-639-1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-Dzl Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) - From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCICJCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:53 PM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFOL Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Original design is 12,260 cfm. Thanks, Paul 404639?0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:15 PM To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles .E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The estimated exhaust airflow is 17,855 CFM (17,163 current) at an estimated external static pressure drop of 2.8 cUrrent] inches WC. The calculation included reducing the air change rate from 15 to 12. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for'Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-033-8307 Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: 770-488-2667 email: KMossl@cdc.gov Messenger-u- From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 3:35 PM - To: Raymond, George Moss, Blanchard, Thomas Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Any update on a date you will know the total CFM required by the exhaust fans? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:00 PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Re: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 You are welcome. Keep in mind that this is a "Ball Park" only. Also, FMED does not support the use of VFD for this application, for reason we discussed during our meeting on yesterday. However, per our agreement during yesterdays, meeting we are willing to revisit this issue once final design for the total required CFM has been determined. In order to put the UFO issue to rest, will you know the total exhaust and supply CFM design (CFM only) within the next couple of weeks? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ODIOCOOIBFOIFMEO Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 1104-5397-2599 Fax: 404-639-1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 Original Message From: Moss, Karen To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Thu May 20 16:49:55 2010 Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The intent is to give a preliminary to PGO to give them an order of magnitude of the cost of the project. I would prefer to err a little on the high side rather than the low. Thanks for your input George, I will use your number of $20,000 for any controls cost {which I assume include cost, installation and programming) associated with 2 VFD's. Final will be presented upon final design documents. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-97 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-438-830? Cell: 404-825?6827 Fax: 770-483-266? email: From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:50 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 I think things are getting lost in Email Translation. The email that Karen sent to Ken had nothing to do with my email below. My email below is only a follow?up to the agreements and action items following our meeting on yesterday. In reference to the email that Karen forwarded on to Ken from Lenore Mickie, PGO only requested a "ballpark figure" and a ?price range" for the overall for this project. If you are adding in the price for the VFD's for "worst case", you can use the following: $10,000 (2 at 5K each) Electrical $20,000 Controls $20,000 Total for VFD Add is between Ball park. However, as stated below, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope of this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. For that matter, you cannot attempted to come-up with and IGE until you have an agreed upon scope and preliminary design. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: [3-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax:404.539.1685 Cell: 4045912599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond. George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost and/or misunderstood in the e-mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGO with a detailed IGE up-front. Lenore Mickie requested the IGE in an e-mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something I'm sure that we all want. She wasn?t trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, and we will revisit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst-case estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail {as is often my problem). Anyway, I believe she needs someone's 0K in FM E0 to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the e-mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop K-BE Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 770-488-8105 Cell: 404-444-6281 e-mail: TBlanchard@cdc.gov Message-nu From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the final design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, position is are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ED Office: 404?639?3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404-639?1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:15 PM To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Ce: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: RE: and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The estimated exhaust airflow is 17,855 CFM (1?,163 current] at an estimated external static pressure drop of 2.8 current] inches W.C. The calculation included reducing the air change rate from 15 to 12. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS K437 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-488-8307 Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: 770-483-2667 email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 3:36 PM To: Raymond, George MOSS, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Prohst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Any update on a date you will know the total CFM required by the exhaust fans? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 4045912599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:00 PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Re: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 You are welcome. Keep in mind that this is a "Ball Park" only. Also, FM EO does not support the use of UFO for this application, for reason we discussed during our meeting on yesterday. However, per our agreement during yesterdays, meeting we are willing to revisit this issue once ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. In order to put the VFD issue to rest, will you know the total exhaust and supva CFM design ohlv) within the next couple of weeks? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404?597-2599 Fax: 404?639-1685 Email: ghr5@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-O4 Original Message From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Ravmond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thu May 20 16:49:55 2010 Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2005453 The intent is to give a preliminary IGE to PGO to give them an order of magnitude ofthe cost of the project. I would prefer to err a little on the high side rather than the low. Thanks for your input George, I will use your number of $20,000 for any controls cost {which I assume include cost, installation and programming} associated with 2 VFD's. Final IGE will be presented upon final design documents. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: WEI-4833307 Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: email: KMossl@cdc.gov Message??~- From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:50 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 I think things are getting lost in Email Translation. The email that Karen sent to Ken had nothing to do with my email below. My email below is only a follow-up to the agreements and action items following our meeting on yesterday. In reference to the email that Karen forwarded on to Ken from Lenore Mickie, PGO only requested a "ballpark ?gure" and a "price range" for the overall IGE for this project. If you are adding in the price for the VFD's for "worst case", you can use the following: VFD's $10,000 (2 at 5K each} Electrical $20,000 Controls $20,000 Total for VFD Add is between Ball park. However, as stated below, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope of this project can be determined until a ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. For that matter, you cannot attempted to come-up with and IGE until you have an agreed upon scope and preliminary design. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1585 Cell: 404.592.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost andfor misunderstood in the e-mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot ofwork on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGO with a detailed IGE up-front. Lenore Mickie requested the IGE in an e-mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something l'm sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is 3 accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, and we will re-visit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst-case estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail {as is often my problem}. Anyway, i believe she needs someone's OK in FMEO to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the e-mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop K-96 Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 770-488-8105 Cell: 404-444-6281 e-mail: TBIanchard @cdc.gov Message--?-- From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the final design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FM EO's position is VFD's are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404-639-1535 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 Hali?i Marthe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 3:36 PM To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole. Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFCJ) Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Yes. . lav . Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS K-97 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-483-830? Cell: 404-325?682? Fax: 770-433-2657 email: KMossl@cdc.gov --?-0riginal Message-??-? From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 3:36 PM To: Raymond, George Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Anv update on a date you will know the total CFM required by the exhaust fans? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, MN, MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1635 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e?mail Message--?-- From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:00 PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Re: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 You are welcome. Keep in mind that this is a "Ball Park" only. Also, FMEO does not support the use of VFD for this application, for reason we discussed during our meeting on yesterday. However, per our agreement during yesterdays, meeting we are willing to revisit this issue once final design for the total required CFM has been determined. In order to put the VFD issue to rest, will you know the total exhaust and supply CFM design only) within the next couple of weeks? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention FM E0 Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 403-639-1635 Email: ghr5@cdc.gov Mail stop: F04 "m Original Message From: Moss, Karen To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Thu May 20 15:49:55 2010 Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The intent is to give a preliminary IGE to P60 to give them an order of magnitude of the cost of the project. I would prefer to err a little on the high side rather than the low. Thanks for your input George, I will use your number of $20,000 for any controls cost {which i assume include cost, installation and programming) associated with 2 VFD's. Final IGE will be presented upon final design documents. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS ill-97 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770488-8307 Cell: 404-325-6827 Fax: 7?0-488-2667 email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:50 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFCH Subject: RE: and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 I think things are getting lost in Email Translation. The email that Karen sent to Ken had nothing to do with my email below. My email below is only a follow-up to the agreements and action items following our meeting on yesterday. In reference to the email that Karen forwarded on to Ken from Lenore Mickie, PGD only requested a "ballpark figure" and a "price range" for the overall IGE forthis project. If you are adding in the price for the VFD's for "worst case", you can use the following: VFD's $10,000 (2 at SK each] Electrical $20,000 Controls $20,000 Total for VFD Add is between Ball park. However, as stated below, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope of this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. For that matter, you cannot attempted to come-up _with and IGE until you have an agreed upon scope and preliminary design. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.633.3335 Fax: 404.633.1585 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: um and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost and/or misunderstood in the e-mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGO with a detailed IGE upafront. Lenore Mickle requested the IGE in an e-mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something I'm sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, and we will revisit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst~case estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail {as is often my problem). Anyway, I believe she needs someone's OK in FMEO to solicit that estimate from it] and sent the e-mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop K-96 Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 770-488-8105 Cell: 404-444-6281 e-mail: TBlanchard@cdc.gov --~~-Drigina From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the final design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FM EO's position is VFD's are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 4046393335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404-639-1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail step: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 2010 3:36 PM To: Raymond, George Moss. Karen Blanchard. Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Any update on a date you will know the total CFM required by the exhaust fans? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: ?104.539.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 5:00 PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. (cocjocooxeFol; Probst, Paul E. (CDC/ocoomFoi Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Re: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 You are welcome. Keep in mind that this is a "Ball Park" only. Also, FMEO does not support the use of VFD for this application, for reason we discussed during our meeting on yesterday. However, per our agreement during yesterdays, meeting we are willing to revisit this issue once final design for the total required CFM has been determined. In order to put the VFD issue to rest, will you know the total exhaust and supply CFM design (CFM only] within the next couple of weeks? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404-639-1635 Email: ghr5@cdc.gov Mail stop: Original Message From: Moss, Karen To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Thu May 20 16:49:55 2010 Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The intent is to give a preliminary IGE to P60 to give them an order of magnitude of the cost of the project. I would prefer to err a little on the high side rather than the low. Thanks for your input George, I will use your number of $20,000 for any controls cost [which I assume include cost, installation and programming} associated with 2 VFD's. Final will be presented upon final design documents. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770488330? Cell: 404-325-6822 Fax: 770488-2657 email: KMossI@cdc.gov From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:50 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 I think things are getting lost in Email Translation. The email that Karen sent to Ken had nothing to do with my email below. My email below is only a follow-up to the agreements and action items following our meeting on yesterday. In reference to the email that Karen forwarded on to Ken from Lenore Mickie, PGO only requested a ?ballpark figure" and a ?price range" for the overall IGE for this project. if you are adding in the price for the VFD's for "worst case", you can use the following: VFD's $10,000 (2 at 5K Each} Electrical $20,000 Controls $20,000 Total for VFD Add is between Ball park. However, as stated below, no decision on adding or not adding the ?v?FDs to the scope of this project can be determined until a ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. For that matter, you cannot attempted to come-up with and until you have an agreed upon scope and preliminary design. 2 George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.592.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Message-?-?? From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost andfor misunderstood in the e-mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGD with a detailed up-front. Lenore Mickie requested the IGE in an e-mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something I'm sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper~plenum vs. VFD's, and we will re-visit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst-case estimate to PGO in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail (as is often my problem]. Anyway, i believe she needs someone's OK in FM E0 to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the e-mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop K-96 Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 370-488-3105 Cell: 404-444-6281 e-mail: TBIanchard@cdc.gov From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered mai.l be improved upon or worsened depending on the final design for exhaust However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until 'a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FMED's position is are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-59?-2599 Fax: 404?639-1585 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:00 PM To: Moss. Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Re: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 You are welcome. Keep in mind that this is a "Ball Park? only. Also, FMEO does not support the use of VFD for this application, for reason we discussed during our meeting on yesterday. However, per our agreement during yesterdays, meeting we are willing to revisit this issue once ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. In order to put the VFD issue to rest, will you know the total exhaust and supply CFM design (CFM only) within the next couple of weeks? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention EC) Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-59?-2599 Fax: 404-639-1635 Email: Mail stop: F-04 Original Message From: Moss, Karen To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (coefocoofarol Sent: Thu May 20 16:49:55 2010 Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The intent is to give a preliminary IGE to P60 to give them an order of magnitude of the cost of the project. I would prefer to err a little on the high side rather than the low. Thanks for your input George, I will use your number of $20,000 for any controls cost [which I assume include cost, installation and programming} associated with 2 VFD's. Final IGE will be presented upon final design documents. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-483-830? Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: 770-483-256? email: KMossl@cdc.gov --?--Origina Message-m- From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:50 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 I think things are getting lost in Email Translation. The email that Karen sent to Ken had nothing to do with my email below. My email below is only a follow-up to the agreements and action items following our meeting on yesterday. In reference to the email that Karen forwarded on to Ken from Lenore Mickie, PGO only requested a "ballpark figure" and a "price range" for the overall for this project. If you are adding in the price for the VFD's for "worst case", you can use the following: VFD's $10,000 (2 at 5K each) Electrical $20,000 Controls $20,000 Total for VFD Add is between Ball park. However, as stated below, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope of this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. For that matter, you cannot attempted to come-up with and IGE until you have an agreed upon scope and preliminary design. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, NW, MS: Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.539.1585 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Prohst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost andfor misunderstood in the e-mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGO with a detailed IGE up?front. Lenore Mickie requested the IGE in an e-mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGID to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something I'm sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an ala rm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, and we will re-visit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst-case estimate to PGO in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail (as is often my problem]. Anyway, I believe she needs someone's OK in FM E0 to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the e-mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1500 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 770-488-8105 Cell: 404-444-6231 e-mail: TBIanchard @cdc.gov mnoriginal From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM - To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. (cocrocooleroi; Probst, Paul E. (CDC/ocoo/Brol Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453- This is a followup to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the ?nal design for exhaust CFM. Howeverthe outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FM EO's position is VFD's are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404-639-1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 Mathe, Chester From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOUIBFO) Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 12:5? PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Bowen. Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFCU Subject: RE: P2009453 Yes, there are three sensor on the wall with tubing connecting to the duct serving Vivarium, incinerator and 1,3? 5 These sensors are for the supply air handler. I understand you concerns. Thanks. From: Moss, Karen (cocrocoosto) Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 12:52 PM To: Raymond, George - Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 George, Thank you for the information. The sensor I saw in the exhaust duct in the interstitial sends a signal to the sUpply air handler? I am hesitant to set a ?rm date for this meeting as we are having issues with the results that came back from the testing company that ran a GPR on the slab. I left Paul a voice mail this morning to discuss. However, if you wouid iikei will set up a meeting for the 27"1 . Best Regards. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 21'0-483-3307' Cell; 404-82543 32? Fax: email: K'Mossl @cd egov From: Raymond, George Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 12:40 PM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: P2009453 u.s.c. g- use. Karen. E??ath} aseaih) I was mistaken in my last response. The static pressure for exhaust fan the roof. There are three sensors located on the interstitial space. These sensors are used determine a loss of exhaust air flow Hope this clears up some of your confusion. i would still like to set a firm date for this review. How does Tuesday 27?? sound. During this meeting we would like to discuss the commissioning activities for the project. Please respond to Paul Probst on the con?rmed meeting date. (Namibia 252::th If there is anything FMEO can do to help you tie down this meeting date, we are more than happy to assist. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 3:49 PM To: Raymond, George Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: P2009453 George, i need someone to tail me what type of sensor is in the duct on the roof and what it?s function is. We will make sure we get a review scheduled before documents are sent to P60. I am not at a point where I can tie down a date to meet. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention DESlgi?l Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road E. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 'eil - 'r'l I I- email .ictl? From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:41 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: P2009453 l'm not 100% bout the high pressure cutoff. In a conversation with Roman. there is no high pressure cut off on the exhaust fans in i am sure that the static pressure is controlled in the interstitial. In a conversation with Charles Daniels. DEMO will not be providing a design with traditional drawing and a specification. Instead the project will be executed as a SOC. This allows the contractor to proceed with the project with a general narrative and an understanding of the customers expectation. I mention to Charles that if this is going to be a SOC and since there will not be any design documents, we need to have a ?nal review with OHS. DEMO, FMEO and Willis mechanical to make sure we all understand the scope of work that Willis will be performing. I'm not sure if this review is included in the schedule that you finalized with Willis mechanical, non the less. we need to have a review before the 2 project gets forwarded on to PGO The-original schedule called for a 30 review starting on June 30. We all agree that a30 day review is not needed. Per Charles the project is scheduled to go to PGO on August 1. Can we meet the week of July 19 to perform a ?nal review of . Lthe project scope before it goes to George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 404-539-3335 Cell: 404-59??2599 Fax: 404-639-1585 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: From: Mess, Karen (CDCIDCDDIBFO) To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Fri Jul 09 11:13:16 2010 Suhjiact: FW: P2009453 George, The purpose of this e?mail is to confirm our conversation yesterday. We retrieved the Johnson Shop Drawing Control Drawings off the server. The duct static pressure sensor that controls the modulating hvpass damper is believed to be located in the - interstial Space not at the roof. You believe the probe at the roof gig'ggi'if duct: pressure increases too much; however this is not mention in the control sequence and needs to be verified. The makeup damper is the same thing as the modulating bypass damper. T813 to accomplish. Best Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Twp-483630? Cell; 404-825-6327? Fax: 170-483-265? email: KM ass i From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 12:47 PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: RE: P2009453 Ken, Thank you for the sequence I have a couple of questions. This sequence states that outside air bypass damper #1 modulate to maintain plenum static pressure set point. As far as I know there 15 not static pressure sensor in the plenum. is that correct? Also, I saw a static pressure probe in the duct on the roof where the T08 person was taking measurements for fan failure test I have also noticed a static pressure sensOr located in the exhaust duct at the interstitial level where it turns before it goes up to the roof Do you what these two static pressure sensors do? Exactly which sensor controls the modulating bypass damper? This sequence describes a makeup air damper I am not aware of a maketh an damper Do you know if this exists and whare it is? The sequence states that it a pair of exhaust fans fail the BAS will shut down its respective AHU and the static pressure set pornt shall be 35% of BCIIVE static pressure set point and that set pom! to be determined by the system balancer. Is this what we want test and balance to accomplish? Regards Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS lit-97' Atlanta. Georgia 30333 7:2 or?? I?_ur. .114: email KMir-k? :fcdl, rt?. From: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 9:29 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: RE: P2009453 File: EF1721-Seqof0ps.pdf From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 8:42 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: P2009453 Ken. r? l_bii3 42 US Do you have the sequence of control for fans I 3 The control sequence on the drawings is not up to date. Thanks in advance for your help. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 D?ice: Cell: 404-325-582? Fax: email: lit-toss] @cdegw Marthe, Chester From: Sent: Monda Jul 6 T0: to: . - 2 2010 2:49 PM . . Proust, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) RE: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday was in the ylyarium infecting mice for our pathogenesis studies. On Wednesday we have 48 hr sacrifice. We will enter in TB room at 130 am and should he done by 11.30 AM. We need to go in the morning (in yiyarium) because we homogenize-organs in the afternoon to plate for MTB CFU count at our proposed work be done after 11.30 Please let us know. Thanks Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 1:52 PM - [it] -r This Wednesday, OHS and Engineering is interested in doing some testing in the Vivarium and need to have access to the central corridor without the programs working in their assigned areas. They would need to have a window from around 7:00am to 2:00pm to do this work and would like to ?nd out what schedule is like and if your group could postpone work until 2:00pm. That does not mean than you could not get into your animal room earlier and do some work, it just means it would need to be coordinated. So please reply to all regarding what your access needs are this Wednesday in the Vivarium. ltu'z- $33,242 U5 [3 53 ESE-Eliht Mathe, Chester From: ?2 5-0 2523"? (C DCIOIDINC EZID) Sent: Mona Jul 26,20101:52 PM To: . HE Co: Proost. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday and This Wednesday, OHS and Engineering is interested in doing some testing in the Vivarium and need to have access to the central corridor without the programs working in their assigned areas. They would need to have a window from around Tz?oam to 2:00pm to do this work and would like to ?nd out what schedule Is like and if your group could postpone work until 2:00pm. That does not mean than you could not get into your animal room earlier and do some work. itjust means it would need to be coordinated. So pIease reply to all regarding what your access needs are this Wednesday In the Vivarium. '3'.42 LIECI QEEBIIH Mathe, Chester From: Moss, Karen (CDGIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, July 22. 2010 3:01 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium 0k, good Karen Moss P.E. From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOJBFO) To: Moss, Karen Nogueira William P. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Iii" . (CDCJOCOOJOHS) Sent: Thu Jul 22 14:29:12 2010 Subject: RE: Vivarium The whole deal about doing it on the weekend was a push by Safety, but if OHS cannot provide the necessary escorts, we have no option but to wait until Tuesday. Thanks. Paul 404639?0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, Jul);r 22, 2010 2:19 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. (CDCIDCOOKBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Subject: RE: Vivarium This affects the testing Company and their plans, I will need to check with them. I thought we couldn?t X-ray with the building occupied. Karen Mass P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-532? Fax: ?ll-483465? email: KMossI@cdc.gov From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOZBFO) Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 2:02 PM To: Nogueira, William P. Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI. Hope this works out in the eight hour window that we are allotted time we have an escort for If not, we will have to continue work on Tuesday. Thanks, Paul 404-839-0505 From: .gnr'w'i?i'i??g?I Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 12:5? PM To: Moss, Karen Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFU) Zambuto, Laura R. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Holmes, David (coqocoorousx Howard, William (Bill) Parker, Darwin Probst, Paul E. Daniels, Charles E. Blanchard, Thomas Subject: RE: Vivarium OK. Here we go. Laura Zambuto and Jeff Sheppard have agreed to escort Roman Phillips in the vivarium on Saturday. Laura will escort from ?am to item. Jeff Sheppard will escort from 11am to 3pm. This will be for Saturday only. No carry over to Sunday. If there is a need for additional work, OHS will work with the programs and make prevision to have this work done during the work week. Please coordinate the weekend efforts with Laura, Jeff and Fioman. Can you have Jeff added to the change room biometric reader. Laura, During your training on Friday, please include both Roman and Jeff. Thanks From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursda Jul 22, 2010 10:25 AM Parker, Darwin Zambuto, Laura R. Probst, Paul E. Daniels, Charles E. Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: Vivarium Just if-we can?t get the testing done this weekend, I will not be able to send the project to P60 on the August 2? which is the deadline for 2010 funds, thus jeopardizing the November 15't start date. 2 Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404?325-6132? Fax: ii?D-433-256? em ail: KMossl @cdc. gm; From: I Egg, I (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 9:49 AM To: Moss, Karen Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CTR) Cc: Sanchez, Anthony Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Parker, Darwin Zambuto, Laura R. Probst, Paul E. Subject: Vivarium After discussion with FSE management, Roman Philips will not be able to enter the vivarium space unescorted. FSE has requested he be escorted at all times. We will continue to try and get him escorted but it is becoming more and more unlikely as we get oloserto the weekend. As of now we have a covered period of 4 hours (Farn to 11am) by Laura which according Karen is not enough. Will keep you updated.? 42 U5 5-252th Maths, Chester From: militia Sent: Thursda July 22, 2010251 PM To: Inns. ,(CDCiocoOisFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium Not biosafety. Next time give me more than three days notice for weekend work. From: Probst, Paul E. To: Moss,r Karen Nogueira, William P. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. (cociocooxsFO); Sent: Thu Jul 22 14:29:12 2010 Subject: RE: Vivarium The whole deal about doing it on the weekend was a push by Safety, but if OHS cannot provide the necessary,r escorts. we have no option but to wait until Tuesday. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, JuIy 22, 2010 2:19 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: RE: Vivarium This affects the testing company and their plans, 1 will need to check with them. I thought we couldn?t X-ray with the building occupied. Karen Moss E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 303.33 Office: Cell: 404?325-5527 Fax: fr: owes?2 as? email: ?iessI@cdc.gov From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursdayl July 22, 2010 2:02 PM To: Nogueira, William P. Ce: Moss, Karen (CDCXOCOOIBFD) Subject: FW: Vivarium F?r?l. Hope this works out In the eight hour window that we are allotted time we have an escort for RomaanSE. If not, We will have to continue work on Tuesday. Thanks, Paul 404-539-0505 Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 12:57 PM To: Moss, Karen Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman Zambuto Laura R. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) (CDCIOCOOJOHS) Cc: Holm?s, David Howard, William (Bill) Parker, Darwin Probst, Paul E. Daniels, Charles E. Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: Vivarium OK. Here we go. Laura Zambutoand Jeff Sheppard have agreed to escort Roman Phillips in the Vivarium on Saturday. Laura will escort from 7am to 11am. Jeff Sheppard will escort from 11am to 3pm. This will be for Saturday only. No carry over to Sunday. If there is a need for additional work, OHS will work with the programs and make provision to have this work done during the work week. Please the weekend efforts with Laura, Jeff and Roman. Can you have Jeff added to the change room biometric reader. Laura, During your training on Friday, please include both Roman and Jeff. Thanks From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursda Jul 22, 2010 10:25 AM To: Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CT R) . . Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Parker, Darwin (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Zambuto, Laura R. Probst, Paul E. Daniels, Charles E. Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDQOCODIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium Just if we can?t get the testing done this weekend, I will not be able to send the project to P60 on the August 2"Id which is the deadline for 2010 funds, thus jeopardizing the November 1St start date. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: amass-sac? Cell: Fax: email: KMossl @cdc. gov From: Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 9:49 AM To: Moss Karen Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CTR) Cc: Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Parker, Danivin (CDCKOCOOJBFD) Zambuto, Laura R. Probst, Paul E. Subject: Vivarium After discussion with FSE management, Roman Philips will not be able to enter the vivarium space unescorted. FSE has requested he be escorted at all times. We will continue to try and get him escorted but it is becoming more and more unlikely as we get closer to the weekend. As of now we have a covered period of 4 hours (7am to 11am) by Laura which according Karen is not enough. Will keep you updated. .m a; is us C?2523 1l Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 2:29 PM To: Moss, Karen Noguelra William P. CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: RE: Vivarium The whole deal about doing it on the weekend was a push by Safety, but if OHS cannot provide the necessary escorts, we have no option but to wait until Tuesday. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 2:19 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: RE: Vivarium This affects the testing company and their plans, I will need to check with them. I thought we couldn't tic-rev with the building occupied. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404~825?632? Fax: 770-488-266? email; KMossI@cdc.gov From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, Julyr 22, 2010 2:02 PM To: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCODIBFD) Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI. Hope this works out in the eight hour window that we are allotted time we have an escort for RomaniFSE. If not. we will have to continue worl-t on Tuesday. Thanks, Paui 404-639-05 05 From: Sign (CDC/ococuoHS) Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 12:57 PM To: Moss, Karen Simpson, Paul D. PhiHips, Roman Zambuto Laura R. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) (CDCIOCOOJOHS) Cci imiaizus.c.s252ams Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Parter, Darwin CDC OCOOIBFO) Probst, Paul E. Daniels, Charles E. Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: Vivarium OK. Here we go. Laura Zambuto and Jeff Sheppard have agreed to escort Roman Phillips in the vivarium on Saturday- Laura will escort from Tarn to 11am. Jeff Sheppard will escort from 11am to 3pm. This will be for Saturday only. No carry over to Sunday. if there is a need for additional work, OHS will work with the programs and make prevision to have this work done during the work week. Please coordinate the weekend efforts with Laura, Jeff and Roman. Can you have Jeff added to the change room biometric reader. Laura, During yourtraining on Friday, please include both Roman and Jeff. Thanks IEI From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursda Jul 22, 2010 10:25 AM To: Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CTR) Cc: Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Parker, Darwin Zambuto, Laura R. Probst, Paul E. Daniels, Charles El Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: Vivarium Just ifwe ca n't get the testing done this weekend, I will not be able to send the project to P60 on the August which is the deadline for 2010 funds, thus jeopardizing the November 1? start date. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325?532? Fax: Willa-185256? ems i1 KMoss @cdogov From: I Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 9:49 AM To: Moss, Karen Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CDCJOCOOJBFO) (CTR) Cc: Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Parker, Darwin (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Zambuto, Laura R. Probst, Paul E. Subject: Vivarium After discussion with FSE management, Roman Philips will not be able to enter the Vivarium space unesoorted. FSE has requested he be escorted at all times. We will continue to try and get him escorted but it is becoming more and more unlikely as we get closer to the weekend. As of now we have a covered period of 4 hours (?arn' to Ham) by Laura which according Karen is not enough. Will keep you updated. h- n- I Ihll3"42 LISA: 2628-11!- Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: - Thursday, July 22. 2010 2:19 PM To: Prohst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Subfect: RE: Vivarium This affects the testing company and their plans, i will need to check with them. I thought we couldn't X?ray with the building occupied. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325?5827 Fax: Will-433456? email: KMossl@odc.gov From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 2:02 PM To: Nogueira, William P. Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI. Hope this works out in the eight hour window that we are allotted time we have an escort for RomaniFSE. If not, we will have to continue work on Tuesday. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: in}? Q'E??gal (CDCIOCDCIOHS) Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 12:57 PM To: Moss, Karen Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CDCICCOOJBFC) (CT Zambuto, Lama R. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) s262am' Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Parker, Darwin Probst, Paul E. Daniels, Charles E. Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: Vivarium 0K. Here we go. Laura Zambuto and Jeff Sheppard have agreed to escort Roman Phillips in the vivarium on Saturday. Laura will escort from Tam to 11am. Jeff Sheppard will escort from 11am to 3pm. This will be for Saturday only. No carry over to Sunday. lfthere is a need for additional work, OHS will work with the programs and make prevision to have this work done during the work week. Please coordinate the weekend efforts with Laura. Jeff and Roman. Can you have Jeff added to the change room Laura, During your training on Friday, please include both Roman and Jeff. Thanks Ila}- [3"42 LIEJII From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursda Jul 22, 2010 10:25 AM Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CTR) - - Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Parker, Darwin (CDCIOCOUIBFO) Zambuto, Laura R. Probst, Paul E. Daniels, Charles Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium Just if we can?t get the testing done this weekend, I will not be able to send the project to P60 on the August which is the deadline for 2010 funds, thus jeopardizing the November 1? start date. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cers Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: noses-330? Cell: 4o4-aaseezr Fax: rte-433455? email: KMossl r?iedcsov From: I Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 9:49 AM To: Moss Karen CDC Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CTR) Cc: 'b1'3-42U-SC-Ev2523rh Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Parker, Darwin (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Zambuto, Laura R. Probst, Paul E. Subject: Vivarium After discussion with FSE management, Roman Philips will not be able to enter the visarium space unescorted. FSE has requested he be escorted at all times. We will continue to try and get him escorted but it is becoming more and more unlikely as we get closer to the weekend. As of new we haVe a covered period of 4 hours {Tam to 11am) by Laura which according Karen is not enough. Will keep you updated. mat-4: as c. sass-1m. Lu Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Proust, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 2:02 PM To: Nogueira, William (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Moss. Karen (CDCIDCOOIBFD) Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI. Hope this works out in the eight hour window that we are allotted time we have an escort for RomaanSE. If not, we will have to continue work on Tuesday. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 12:57 PM To: Moss, Karen Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Zambuto, Laura Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Cc: :12 us os?azarh, Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Parker, Darwin (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Probst, Paul E. Daniels, Charles E. Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: 1Llivarium OK. Here we go. Laura Zambuto and Jeff Sheppard have agreed to escort Roman Phillips in the vivarium on Saturday. Laura will escort from Tam to 11am. Jeff Sheppard will escort from 11am to 3pm. This will be for Saturday only. No carry? over to Sunday. If there is a need for additional work, OHS will work with the programs and make prevision to have this work done during the work week. Please coordinate the weekend efforts with Laura, Jeff and Roman. Can you have Jeff added to the change room mil-'uUS-C- smart? Laura, During your training on Friday, please include both Roman and Jeff. Thanks From: Moss, Karen Sent: Th rsda Jul 22, 2010 10:25 AM i a. Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CPR) - Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Parker, Darwin Zambuto, Laura R. Proust, Paul E. Daniels, Charles E. Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: Vivarium 1 Just if we can?t get the testing done this weekend, I will not be able to send the project to P60 on the August 2"d which is the deadline for 2010 funds, thus jeopardizing the November 1? start date. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-632? Fax: 770-433?2557 email: KMossl @cdcgov Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 9:49 AM . Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CDCXOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Cc: Holmes, David Howard, William (Hill) Parker, Darwin (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Zambuto, Laura R. Prohst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Vivarium After discussion with FSE management, Roman Philips will not be able to enter the vivarium space unescorted. FSE has requested he be escorted at all times. We will continue to and get him escorted but it is becoming more and more unliker as we get closer to the weekend. As of now we have a covered period of 4 hours (Tarn to 11am) by Laura which according Karen is not enough. Will keep you updated. US I: :?Eth Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: (cocrocoorosuey Sent: Thursday, July 22. 2010 12:57 PM To: Moss, Karen Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCODIBFO) Zambuto, Laura R. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) E) Cc: are: Holmes, David Howard, William {Bill} Parter, Darwin Probst, Paul E. Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOM Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium OK. Here we go. Laura Zambuto and Jeff Sheppard have agreed to escort Roman Phillips in the vivarium on Saturday. Laura will escort from Tam to 11am. Jeff Sheppard will escort from 11am to 3pm. This will be for Saturday only. No carry over to Sunday. If there is a need for additional work, OHS will work with the programs and make prevision to have this work done during the work week. Please coordinate the weekend efforts with Laura, Jeff and Roman. ibu3l'42 USE: 202mm Can you have Jeff added to the change room were 3262mm. Laura, During your training on Friday. please include both Roman and Jeff. Thanks From: Moss, Karen (CDCIDCDOIBFO) Sent: Thursda Jul 22, 2010 10:25 AM I 3 Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Parker, Darwin (cocrocoorsFO) Zambuto, Laura R. Probst, Paul E. (cocjocoorsro); Daniels, Charles E. Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium Just if we can?t get the testing done this weekend, I will not be able to send the project to P60 on the August which is the deadline for 2010 funds, thus jeopardizing the November 1st start date. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: mass-sac? Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: email: Masai @cdcrov From: I 3' Dag-331- I Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 9:49 AM Moss Karen Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CTR) Er Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Parker, Darwin (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Zambuto, Laura R. Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Subject: Vivarium After discussion with FSE management, Roman Philips will not be able to enter the Vivarium space unesoorted. FSE has requested he be escorted at all times. We will continue to try and get him escorted but it is becoming more and more unliker as we et closer to the weekend. As of now we have a covered period of 4 hours (Tarn to 11am) by Laura which according is not enough. Will keep you updated. mile 4: I: sassam Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Mossl Karen (CDCIOCCOIBFO) Sent: Thursda ,Jul 22. To: me: (oocrocoorosaE); Simpson. Paul D. Phillips, ocrocoorsFO) Cc: ibii?i Holmes. David Howard. William II) Parker. Darwin (morocco/em) Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCICIDINCIRDE PtobstI Paul E. Daniels, Charles E. Blanchard. Thomas M. Subject: RE: Vivarium Just if we can't get the testing done this weekend. I will not be able to send the project to P60 on the August which is the deadline for 2010 funds. thus jeopardizing the November 1" start date. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Dl?ce: ??0?433-330? Cell: 4o4-szs-sazv Fax: ??0-453-266? email: L'Mgssi IUIIJHH . 9n. From: . a beamcocrocooxoasy Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 9:49 AM To: Moss Karen Simpson, Paul D. Phillips, Roman (CTR) Cc: Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Parker,r Darwin Zambuto, Laura R. Probst, Paul E. Subject: Vivarium . After discussion with FSE management. Roman Philips will not be able to enter the vivarium space unescoried. FSE has requested he be escorted at all times. We will continue to try and get him escorted but it is becoming more and more unlikely as we get closer to the weekend. As of now we have a covered period of 4 hours (7am to 11am) by which according Karen is not enough. Will keep 1you updated. on 42 SIB. in Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: (coci'ocoorows) Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 9:49 AM To: Moss, Karen Simpson. Paul D. Phillips, Roman Cc: Hoim?s. David Howard William (Bill) Parker, Darwin (CDCIOCODIBFO) (CTR): Zambuto. mi}. Probst. Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFOJ Subject: Vivarium After discussion with FSE management. Roman Phi?ps will not be able to enter the vivariurn space unescorted. FSE has requested he be escorted at all times. We will continue to try and get him escorted but it is becoming more and more unlikely as we get closer to the weekend. As of now we have a covered period of 4 hours (Tarn to 11am} by Laura which according Karen is not enough. Will keep you updated. 2-32 E- [2 Maths, Chester From: Nogueira, William P. Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:48 PM To: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium Just an FYI From: Moss, Karen (CDCIUCUOIBFO) Sent: Wednesda July 21, 2010 1:20 PM To: (cocrocooroHS); Simpson, Paul D. Zambuto, Laura R. Phillips, Roman (CTR) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) 'b-l'gllzu'sc @2623? Daniels, Charles E. Nogueira, William P. (CDC/ocoorsFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium All, As per discussed with Paul Simpson and Dr. Meechan during our walk down with the testing company last week; this testing process could become very tedious; we discussed two possible days oftesting as worse case scenario. We may get lucky and find areas to core within hours. We may not. The testing company is prepared to come back Sunday if needed. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 ornaa: 710-433-8307 Cell: 404-325-5327 Fax: 770-483-255? emaiir?mmssos From: Moss, Karen (coclocooraFO) Sent: Wednesda July 21, 2010 12:45 PM To: (cocrocooronsy Simpson, Paul D. (coo/ocoorOI-lsl; Zambuto, Laura R. Phillips, Roman (CTR) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) 'b1'3'242'i50 Daniels, Charles E. (cocrocoorsFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium MEI-12 LIE-E. 252th} All, The testing mat},r take longer than at hours. We need an escort and access to that for a minimum of 8 hours should testing take that long. We have to he prepared for the worst case scenario. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: WEI-4 aa-sso? Cell: sills-825632? Fax: 710-488-265? Email: KMossl From: :3195 Elm Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 12:21 PM To: Moss, Karen Simpson, Paul D. Zambuto, Laura R. Phillips, Roman (CDCICCOGIBFO) (CTR) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) 5253mm Subject: Vivarium All, Laura Zambuto has agreed to escort Roman in the vivarium on Saturday for 4 hours. I believe the start time was at am but I will let you all work out the details. So please coordinate with Laura and Roman to work everything out. Thanks made us c: szaeam: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Phillips, Roman (cocrocooraFO) (CTR) Sent: Wednesday, Jqur 21, 2010 1:32 PM To: Prohst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium fyi From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesda July 21, 2010 1:20 PM To: ma Simpson, Paul D. Zambuto, Laura R. (cocroromqao); Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (CDQUCDOIOHS) Daniels, Charles E. Nogueira, William P. Subject: RE: Vivarium All, As per discussed with Paul Simpson and Dr. Meechan during our walk down with the testing company last week; this testing process could become very tedious; we discussed two possible days of testing as worse case scenario. We may get lucky and find areas to core within hours. We may not. The testing company is prepared to come back Sunday if needed. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K07 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce; moans-sari? Cell: 404-825-632? Fax: om ail; EMoss l@cdc_gov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesda July 21, 2010 12:45 PM To: (CDC/ocooiwsi; Simpson, Paul D. Zambuto, Laura R. (cocrommcmo), Phillips, Roman (CDCXOCOOJBFD) (CTR) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Daniels, Charles E. Subject: RE: Vivarium Pa t, All, or a minimum of8 hours The testing may take longer than 4 hours. We need an escort and access to that should testing take that long. We have to be prepared for the worst case scenario. Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: amass-53o? Cell: 404-325-882? Fax: Nil-488256? email: Wm From: Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 12:21 PM To: Moss, Karen Simpson, Paul D. Zambuto, Laura R. Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS Subject: Vivarium AllI Laura Zambuto has agreed to escort Roman in the vivarium on Saturday for 4 hours. I believe the start time was at 7 am butl will let you all Work out the details. So please coordinate with Laura and Roman to work everything out. Thanks 5262mm Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday. July 20, 2010 3:18 PM To: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Simpson, Paul D. Co: Meechan, Paul J. Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Nogueira, William P. Gaunce, Jean A. Chan, Chi Sum Probst, Paul E. Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) thllEl; .. RE: Ell-Ralf Building ivarium ?2623lh ARR has informed me that theyr are not available this Saturday, July I planned to be on site on Saturday; however I will not be able to be there as early as ?:DDa.m. due to family commitments . Roman will need at least 30 minutes oftraining from the contractors. The contractors from ATS doing the work are Chad Russell and Mark Bottoms. Do you want to get security clearance forthem for buildingElor-shta?l?isI: The contractors do not need power cords just access to ladders. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 720-483-330? Cell: 404-825-1582? Fax: ?ll-483.266? email: KMoss] @cdc.gov From: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 2:55 PM To: Simpson, Paul D. Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Meechan, Paul J. (cocxocoollons); Holmes, David (cocrocoovaHS); Howard, William (Bill) Nogueira, William P. Gaunce, Jean A. Chan, Chi Sum Probst, s?ub?ectr'RE': zit-Ra? Vivarium i do not have access to that area. i will need someone from ARE to let me in. They may need to be around for a while ifl need to come out and come back in for whatever reason. ?Roman From: Simpson, Paul D. Sent: Tuesday, July 20. 2010 2:41 PM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Meechan, Paul J. Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Simpson, Paul D. Nogueira, William P. Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOJBFD) Gaunce, Jean A. Chan, Chi Sum RE: Xr?ay Building. ivarium 2E2aih Karen, (moms C2 . . - Roman Phillips possesses access to the 953mm and Will not reqmre any additional Will you be present on Saturday morning? How many contractors wiil be on sight, and who will be their escort? I plan to bring radiation monitoring badges for all participants. Does Roman need to coordinate with the contractor beforehand to discuss his task and resource requirements. For example, will the contractor need an heavy duty power extension cord considering that there are three radiography locations? We Would still like to start early, approximately MOD Hours. By the way, we plan to inform persons who work in building about the event via email. Do we need any support from lWarden Security, Inc. Please give me a telephone call at to discuss Saturday's activities to ensure that we have all the safety issues in place. Thank you, Paul From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 2:12 PM To: Meechan, Paul J. Holmes, David Simpson, Paul D. (CDCKOCOOJDHS) If EH3 XzRav. Big I Vivarium 252mm lb @342 U50 FYI, see below. Who will let Roman Phillips into the 262341: to tape up the X?Rav ?lm? From what I understand he doesn?t have access and ARE will not be available. Best Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: rinses-sac? Cell: 404-325-552? Fax: times-ass? emaii: Kjv?lossi @cdcgov From: (coo/ommcenap) I Sent: uesday, July 2 2010 1:53 PM To: Moss, Karen I cc: Nogueira, William P. RE: ~-X-~Ray Ms. Moss, I just talked to Mr. Nogueira and he tells me that this process may take more than 2 hours. I will be out of town and my techs are only scheduled to be here for no more than two hours this weekend. I realize that you may be under strict time constraints but it would be more advantageous for this to be done next week when I can be available for the whole time needed. Let me know your thoughts. Tried to call you. From: Nogueira, William P. Sent: Tuesday, July 2t], 2010 11:04 AM To: Simpson, Paul D. (C Jacksm, Eddie {Eligi?gm?m Fw; X?ay Big Vivarium FYI From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODIBFU) Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 10:53 AM To: Nogueira, William P. (CDCJUCOOJBFO) Cc: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOWBFO) Bel?eld, Emanuel Probst, Paul E. Ungle:?rthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) . ?2s52umh?h 319 Ivanum We have tentatively set up the test forT?O am. on Saturday morning, July However we are awaiting purchase order from PGD. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: mass-ass? Cell: assess-sea? ibiiBii ?2 Fax: Wilt-488255? email: KMossl @cdegov From: Negueira, William P. Sent: Tuesday, July 201f 2010 8:20 AM To: Mess, Karen Cc: Phillips, Roman Bel?eid, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Probst, Paul E. g! Vivarium Good morning Karen, Just wanted to ?nd out if the dates and times have been set up to X-ray the ?oors in Big yet. Please let me know. Thanks Paul mm"? 42 E: 9??slh' Bl 4-2 have been established Mathe, Chester From: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFCJ) (CTR) Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 2:55 PM To: Simpson, Paul D. Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Meechan, Paul J. Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Nogueira, William P. Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCIOCOOIOSH hen, Chi Sum Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Hgg??t. RE. Ray Building Ivarium I do not have access to that area. I will need someone from ARE to let me in. They may need to be around for a while if I need to come out and Come back in for whatever reason. ?Roman From: Simpson, Paul D. Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 2:41 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Meechan, Paul J. Holmes, David Howard, William (Bill) Simpson, Paul D. Nogueira, William P. Phillips, Roman Gaunce, Jean A. Chan, Chi Sum (CDCIOCOOIOHS) act: .XrRav Building. ivarium 262a{ Karen, Roman Phillips possesses access to the and will not require any additional assistance. Will you be present on Saturday morning? How many contractors will be on sight, and who will be their escort? I plan to bring radiation monitoring badges for all participants. Does Roman needto coordinate with the contractor beforehand to discuss his task and resource requirements. For example, will the contractor need an heavy duty power extension cord considering that there are three radiography location? We would still like to start early, approximately 0700 Hours. By the way, we plan to inform persons who work in building about the event via email. Do we need any support from Warden Security, inc. Please give me a telephone call ato discuss Saturday's activities to ensure that we have all the safety issues In place. Thank you, Paul From: Moss, Karen (CDCKOCOOKBFO) Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 2:12 PM To: Meeohan, Paul J. Holmes, David Simpson, Paul D. mielr?uhziacti PW: .319 Jivariurn 2625M USC . 5E5};th FYI, Phillips-Into the to tape up the X-Rav film? From what I understand he doesn?t have access and ABS will not be available. Best Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Controi and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 7704834330? Cell: ?tot-825632? Fax: Will?483205? email: [-{Mossl @cdcgov Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 1:53 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODIBFD) Cc: Nogueira, William lbi?ii act: BI Vivarium aszam Ms. Moss, just talked to Mr. Nogueira and he tells me that this process may take more than 2 hours. I will be out of town and my techs are only scheduled to be here for no more than two hours this weekend. i realize that you may be under strict time constraints but it would be more advantageous for this to he done next week when i can be available for the whole time needed. Let me know your thoughts. Tried to call you. [Camease Control and Prevention From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCODKBFO) Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 11:04 AM I lt1il3ii . HEM. FW Rev Ivarlum FYI From: Moss, Karen (CDCIDCOOJBFO) Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 10:53 AM To: Nogueira, William P. Cc: Phillips, Roman Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Paul E. Lingl rthur R. {l3 - Mg Ray 319. Ivarlum We have tentatively set up the test for 7:00 am. on Saturday morning, July However we are awaiting purchase order from PGO. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 I Of?ce: 170-433-8307 Cell: 404-825?682? ax: 77'0?433?265? email: KMossl I?E'Ucdoeov From: Nogueira, William P. Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 8:20 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Phillips, Roman Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOKBFD) Probst, Paul E. I cocypcooiaFO) 1mg}: x435}; B g : Vivarium Good morning Karen. (anaemms Just wanted to ?nd out if the dates and times have been set up to X-ray the floors in Big have been-eats a yet. Please let me Know. Thanks Paul Mathis, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, July 20. 2010 10:53 AM To: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Eiel?eld1 Emanuel (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Probst, Paul Lingler, Arthur R- (CDCIOCDOIBFO) misi? t: Bis. Vivarium ?262a{h We have tentatively set up the test for 7:00 am. on Saturdayr morning, July However we are awaiting purchase order from PGO. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: lCell: 404-325-6827 Fax: ?ll-433466? email: KMosslra?cdceov From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 8:20 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Phillips, Roman Bel?eld, Emanuel Probst, Paul E. Vivarium Good morning Karen. tbit?'erlUEBx?? Just wanted to ?nd out if the dates and times have been set up to X?ray the floors in Big have vet. Please let me know. Thanks Paul Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEPJ From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday. July ?12, 2010 4:09 PM To: Raymond, George Moss, Karen Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole. Kenneth K. Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: P2009453 Karen: Following up on our conversation, it may be better for CDC to have Willis locate the specific opening to be cored to be approved by CDC. That way they take responsibility should a conduit get hit. However. we (CDC) should identify the general area for the proposed opening(s) subject to approval from a structural engineer. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 12:5? PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCDDIBFD) Subject: RE: P2009453 - . . . . [bilEl 42 I: Yes, there are three sensor on the wall with tubing connecting to the duct serving Vivanum, Incinerator and in These sensors are for the supply air handler. I understand you concerns. Thanks. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOWBFO) Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 12:52 PM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOXBFD) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: P2009453 George, Thank you for the information. The sensor I saw in the exhaust duct in the interstitial sends a signal to the supply air handler? I am hesitant to set a firm date forthis meeting as we are having issues with the results that came back from the testing company that ran a GPR on the slab. I left Paul a voice mail this morning to discuss. However, if you would like I will set Up a meeting for the 27?? . Best Regardsr Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: email: KMosstr?chc. gov From: Raymond, George Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 12:40 PM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) 42 Subject: RE: P2009453 mal?u 252th ss'?ath] Karen. . .I . use 'staken in my last response. The static pressure for exhaust fan Is control from the sersor located 5' There are three sensors located on the interstitial space. These sensors are used by the and the n?z' 5 - HU to determine a loss of exhaust air ?ow. Hope this clears up some of your confusion. I would still like to set a ?rm date for this review. How does Tuesday 27?" sound. During this meeting we would like to discuss the commissioning activities for the project. Please respond to Paul Probst on the con?rmed meeting date. If there is anything FMEO can do to help you tie down this meeting date, we are more than happy to assist. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 3:49 PM To: Raymond, George Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 George, I need someone to tell me what type of sensor is in the duct on the roof and what it?s function is. We will make sure we get a review scheduled before documents are sent to P50. lam not at a point where I can tie down a date to meet. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Celt: dos-assess? Fax: noses-ass? email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Raymond, George (CDCIDCDDIBFD) Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:41 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Subject: Re: P2009453 I'm not 100% about the high pressure cut off. in a conversation with Roman, there is no high pressure cut off on the exhaust fans in I am sure that the static pressure is controlled in the interstitial. In a conversation with Charles Daniels, DEMO will not be providing a design with traditional drawing and a speci?cation. Instead the projectwill be executed as a SOC. This allows the contractor to proceed with the project with a general narrative and an understanding of the customers expectation. I mention to Charles that if this is going to be a SOC and since there will not be any design documents, we need to have a ?nal review with OHS, DEMO. FMEO and Willis mechanical to make sure we all understand the scope of work that Willis will be performing. I'm not sure if this review is included in the schedule that you finalized with Willis mechanical, non the less, we need to have a review before the project gets forwarded on to P60. The original schedule called for a 30 review starting on June 30. We all agree that a 30 day review is not needed. For Charles the project is scheduled to go to P60 on August 1. Can we meet the week of July 19 to perform a ?nal review of the project scope before it goes to George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ODIOCOOIBFOIFMEO- Of?ce: 404-639?3335 Cell: 404-59?-2599 Fax: 404?639-1685 .Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 From: Moss, Karen To: Raymond, George Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Fri Jul 09 11:13:16 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 George, The purpose of this e?mail is to confirm our conversation yesterday. We retrieved the Johnson Shop Drawing Control Drawings off the server. The duct static pressure sensor that controls the modulating bypass damper is believed to be located in the interstial space not at the roof. You believe the probe at the roofto be a duct pressure sensorl $53332 SE [bi-.3142 it duct pressure increases too much; however this is not mention in the control sequence and EE'Eaih neeos to be rified. The makeup damper is the same thing as the modulating bypass damper. T813 to accomplish. Best Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. M8 K-ST Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Till-483630? Cell: 404?325?632? Fax: Tim?4332513? email: KMossl@cdc.gcv From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 12:47 PM To: Walpole, Kenneth Cc: Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Ken, Thank you for the sequence. I have a couple of questions. This sequence states that outside air bypass damper #1 will modulate to maintain plenum static pressure set point. As far as I know there is not static pressure sensor in the plenum; is that correct? Also, I saw a static pressure probe in the duct on the roof where the T38 person was taking measurements for fan failure test. have also noticed a static pressure sensor located in the exhaust duct at the interstitial level where it turns before it goes up to the roof. Do you what these two static pressure sensors do? Exactly which sensor controls the modulating bypass damper? This sequence describes a makeup air damper. I am not aware of a makeup air damper. Do you know if this exists and where it is? The sequence states that if a pair of exhaust fans fail the BAS will shut down its respective AHU and the static_pressure set point shall be 35% of active static pressure set point and that set point to be determined by the system balancer. Is this what we want test and balance to accomplish? Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-552? Fax: email: @cdc.gov From: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 9:29 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCUOIBFCO Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: RE: P2009453 ?1 File: EF1721-Seqof0ps.pdf From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 8:42 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCXOCOOJBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: P2009453 Ken, [states 0 so 2523'?! Do'yoo have the sequence 'er'eantterter tens The control sequence on the drawings is not up to date. Thanks in advance for your help. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-852? Fax: Will-489266? email: KMoss] @cdcgov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 12:5? PM To: Moss. Karen (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFG) Subject: RE: P2009453 [bll?] 42 Yes, there are three sensor on the wall with tubing connecting to the duct serving Vivarium, incinerator an: 955,? These sensors are for the supply air handler. I understand you concerns. Thanks- From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 12:52 PM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCDUIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: P2009453 George, Thank 1you for the information. The sensor I saw in the exhaust duct in the interstitial sends a signal to the supply air handler? I am hesitant to set a ?rm date for this meeting as we are having issues with the results that came back from the testing company that ran a GPR on the slab. i left Paul a voice mail this morning to discuss. However, it you would like i will set up a meeting for the 27"" . Best Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS 14-97 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 270-430-3307 Cell; 404-025-6327 Fax: 720?433-2507 email: vaiossl @cdc.gov From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 12:40 PM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 to determine a loss of exhaust air flow. Hope this clears up some of your confusion. ratecontrol from the sensor located nd the Karen, I was mistaken in my last response. The static pressure for exhaust fan There are three sensors located on the interstitial space. These sensors are used by the E: in Igfl 23th] - I would still like to set a ?rm date for this review. How does Tuesday 27"? sound. During this meeting we would like to gigg?I?l-J 3'3 discuss the commissioning activities forthe project. Please respond to Paul Probst on the con?rmed meeting date. If there is anything FMEO can do to help you tie down this meeting date, we are more than happy to assist. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Friday, July as, 2010 3:49 PM To: Raymond, George Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 George, I need someone to tell me what type of sensor is in the duct on the roofand what it?s function is. We will make sure we get a review scheduled before decoments are sent to P60. I am not at a point where I can tie down a date to meet. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 7ro435-asor Cell: 404-825-632? Fax: email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Raymond, George (CDCJOCOOXBFO) Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:41 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: P2009453 - I?m not 100% sure about the high pressure cutoff. In a conversation with Roman, there is no high pressure cutoff on the exhaust fans in 18. I am sure that the static pressure is controlled in the interstitial. In a conversation with Charles Daniels, DEMO will not be providing a design with traditional drawing and a speci?cation. Instead the project will be executed as a SOC. This allows the contractor to proceed with the project with a general narrative and an understanding of the customers expectation. I mention to Charles that if this is going to be a SOC and since there will not be any design documents. we need to have a ?nal review with OHS, DEMO, FMEO and Willis mechanical to make sure we all understand the scope of work that Willis will be performing. I?m not sure if this review is included in the schedule that you ?nalized with Willis mechanical. non the less, we need to have a review before the 2 project gets forwarded onto PGO. The original schedule called for a 30 review starting on June 30. We all agree that a 30 day review is not needed. Ffer Charles the project is scheduled to go to PGO on August 1. Can we meet the week of July 19 to perform a final review of the project scope before it goes to George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ODIDCOOIBFOIFMEO Of?ce: 404-639-3335 Cell: Fax: 404?639-1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov I'vlaii stop: F-D4 From: Moss, Karen To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCODIBFOJ Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Fri Jul 09 11:13:15 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 George, The purpose of this e-mail is to confirm our conversation yesterday. We retrieved the Johnson Shop Drawing Control Drawings offthe server. The duct static pressure sensor that controls the modulating bypass damper is believed to be located in the interstial sate not at the roof. You believe the probe at the roof to be a duct pressure sensor "3 i? if duct pressure increases too much; however this is not mention in the control sequence and needs to be veri?ed. ibii?3i 2623M The makeup damper is the same thing as the modulating bypass damper. TELB to accomplish. I Best Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officers Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770?435-330? Cell: 404-825-632? Fax: email: KMossl @cdcgov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 12:4? PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: RE: P2009453 Ken. Thank you for the sequence. 1 have a couple of questions. This sequence states that outside air bypass damper #1 will modulate to maintain plenum static pressure set point. As tar as i know there is not static pressure sensor in the plenum; is that correct? Also, I saw a static pressure probe in the duct on the root'where the T83 person was taking measurements for fan failure test. have also noticed a static pressure sensor located in the exhaust duct at the interstitial level where it turns before it goes up to the roof. Do you what these two static pressure sensors do? Exactly,r which sensor controls the modulating bypass damper? This sequence describes a makeup air damper. i am not aware of a makeup air damper. Do you know if this exists and where it is? The sequence states that if a pair of exhaust fans fail the BAS will shut down its respective AHU and the static pressure set point shall be 35% of active static pressure set point and that set point to be determined by the system balancer. Is this what we want test and balance to accomplish? RegardsI Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-Qir Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 270-438-3307 lCell: 404.325?532? Fax: W04BB-2667 email: KMoss 1 @od cgov From: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 9:29 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIGCOOXBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: RE: P2009453 File: From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODKBFO) Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 8:42 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. (CDQOCDOJBFO) Subject: P2009453 Ken, 5'3 ??u..hav.e uence fans- The control sequence on the drawings is not up to date. Thanks in advance for your help. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-6852? Fax: ern ail: Rimless] @cdc. gov Ll'l Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, July12, 2010 12:52 PM To: Raymond. George Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: P2009453 George, Thank you for the information. The sensor i saw in the exhaust duct in the interstitial sends a signal to the supply air handler? I am hesitant to set a ?rm date for this meeting as we are having issues with the results that came back from the testing company that ran a GPR on the slab. I left Paul a voice mail this morning to discuss. However, if you would like I will set up a meeting for the 27'? . Best Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Tim?4333307 Cell: 404~025-6327 Fax: email: KMoss] @cdcgov From: Raymond, George Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 12:40 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOZBFOJ Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCODJBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Egg :12 so a: raise so Karen r: I was mistaken in my last response. The static pressure for exhaust fan control from sor located the roof. There are three sensors located on the interstitial space. These sensors are used by the and the ne 3:3? 3 to determine a loss of exhaust air flow. Hope this clears up some of your confusion. I would still like to set a firm date for this review. How does Tuesday 22?" sound. During this meeting we would like to discuss the commissioning activities for the project. Please respond to Paul Probst on the con?rmed meeting date. if there is anything FMED can do to help you tie down this meeting date, we are more than happy to assist. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODXBFO) Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 3:49 PM To: Raymond, George Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 . George, I need someone to tell me what type of sensor is in the duct on the roofand what it's function is. We will make sure we get a review scheduled before documents are sent to P60. I am not at a point where I can tie down a date to meet. Raga rds, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: rroassesov cert: ass-assess? Fax: ??o?4a8-266? em all: KMoss 1 @od cgov From: Raymond, George (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:41 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: P2009453 I'm not 100% sure about the high pressure cutoff. In a conversation with Roman, there is no high pressure out off on the exhaust fans in 18. I am sure that the static pressure is controlled in the interstitial. in a conversation with Charles Daniels, DEMO will not be providing a design with traditional drawing and a speci?cation. Instead the project will be executed as a SOC. This allows the contractor to proceed with the project with a general narrative and an understanding of the customers expectation. I mention to Charles that if this is going to be a SOC and since there will not be any design documents, we need to have a ?nal review with OHS, DEMO, FMEO and Willis mechanical to make sure we all understand the scope of work that Willis will be performing. I'm not sure if this review is included in the schedule that you ?nalized with Willie mechanical, non the less, we need to have a review before the project gets forwarded on to PGO. The original schedule called for a 30 review starting on June 30. We all agree that a 30 day review is not needed. Per Charles the project is scheduled to go to P60 on August 1. Can we meet the week of July 19 to perform a ?nal review of the project scope before it goes to George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ODIOCOOIBFOIFMEO Office: 404?639-3335 Cell: 404?59??2599 Fax: 404-639-1585 (mill. Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 From: Moss, Karen (CDCKOCODIBFO) To: Raymond, George (CDCIQCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels,r Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Fri Jul 09 11:13:16 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 George, The purpose ofthis e-mail is to confirm our conversation yesterday. We retrieved the Johnson Shop Drawing Control Drawings off the server. The duct static pressure sensor that controls the modulating bypass damper is believed to be located in the interstia] space not at the roof. You believe the probe at the roofto be a duct pressure sensorl tepid? 5 if duct pressure increases too much; however this is not'mention in the control sequence and nee - to verified. The makeup damper is the same thing as the modulating bypass damper. to accompiish. Best Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-532? Fax: 77048.8?256? email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 12:47 PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: RE: P2009453 Ken, Thank you for the sequence. have a couple of questions. This sequence states that outside air bypass damper #1 will modulate to maintain plenum static pressure set point- As far as I know there is not static pressure sensor in the plenum; is that correct? Also. I sawa static pressure probe in the duct on the roof where the person was taking measurements for fan failure test. have also noticed a static pressure 3 sensor located in the exhaust duct at the interstitial level where it turns before it goes up to the roof. Do you what these two static pressure sensOrs do? Exactly which sensor controls the modulating bypass damper? This sequence describes a makeup air damper. I am not aware of a makein air damper. Do you know if this exists and where it is? The sequence states that if a pair of exhaust fans fail the BAS will shut down its respective AHU and the static pressure set point shall be 35% of active static pressure set point and that set point to be determined by the system balancer. Is this what we want test and balance to accomplish? Regards, Karen Moss FEE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-532? Fax: WEI-4302507 em ail: Kit-1055 lt?icdegov From: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Friday, July '02, 2010 9:29 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 File: From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDOKBFO) Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 8:42 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: P2009453 Ken. [bit?] :12 '1 2523a,. DE [ydunbave thesequenoe tat-control for fans The control sequence on the drawings is not up to date. Thanks in advance for your help. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Celt: 404-325-382? ax: email: @cdcgov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Raymond. George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, July12,2010 12:40 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: P2009453 [pic] 42 262mm} KarenF was mistaken in my last response. The static pressure for exhaust fan :lis control from *he sen tor locatediE?L-L- a. the roof. There are three sensors located on the interstitial space. These sensors are used by the and the newii'm . laggiin HU to determine a loss of exhaust air flow. Hope this clears up some of your confusion. I would still like to set a firm date for this review. How does Tuesday 27?? sound. During this meeting we would like to discuss the commissioning activities for the project. Please respond to Paul Probst on the confirmed meeting date. If there is anything FMEO can do to help you tie down this meeting date. we are more than happy to assist. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 3:49 PM To: Raymond. George (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Cc: Daniels. Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: P2009453 George. i need someone to tell me what type of sensor is in the duct on the roof and what it's function is. We will make sure we get a review scheduled before documents are sent to P00. lam not at a point where i can tie down a date to meet. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce; N0483-330T Cell: 404%25682? Fax: ??0438-206? email: KMossl @cdcgov From: Raymond, George Sent: Friday. July 09, 2010 11:41 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCKOCOOIBFO) tbjiEli 2523M Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: P2009453 i'm not 100% - bout the high pressure cut off. In a conversation with Roman, there is no high pressure cutoff on the exhaust fans i I am sure that the static pressure is controlled in the interstitial. [n a conversation with Charles Daniels, DEMO will not be providing a design with traditional drawing and a speci?cation. Instead the project will be executed as a SOC. This allows the contractor to proceed with the project with a general narrative and an understanding of the customers expectation. I mention to Charles that if this is going to be a SOC and since there will not be any design documents, we need to have a ?nal review with DHS, DEMO, FMEC and Willis mechanical to make sure we all understand the scope of work that Willis will be performing. I'm not sure if this review is included in the schedule that you finalized with Willis mechanical, non the less, we need to have a review before the project gets forwarded on to PGO. The original schedule called for a 30 review starting on .June 30. We all agree that a 30 day review is not needed. For Charles the project is scheduled to go to PGO on August 1. Can we meet the week of July 19 to perform a ?nal review of the project scope before it goes to George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ODIOCOOIBFOIFMEO Office: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-59?-2599 Fax: 404?639-1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 From: Moss, Karen To: Raymond, George (CDCKOCOOIBFD) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Fri Jul 09 11:13:16 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 George, The purpose ofthis e-mail is to con?rm our conversation yesterday. We retrieved the Johnson Shop Drawing Control Drawings offthe server. The duct static pressure sensor that controls the modulating bypass damper is believed to be located in the interstial space not at the roof. You believe the probe at the roof to be a duct pressure sensor if duct pressure increases too much; however this is not mention in the control sequence and needs to be verified. The makeup damper is the same thing as the modulating bypass damper. to accomplish. Best Regards, Karen Moss F. E. Mechanical Engineer .1 It". 4: LI -. Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: rteasa-sscr Cell: 404-825-5027 Fax: email: @cdcgov From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 12:4? PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIDCOOXBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Ken, Thank you for the sequence. have a couple of questions. This sequence states that outside air bypass damper #1 will modulate to maintain plenum static pressure set point. As far as i know there is not static pressure sensor in the plenum; is that correct? Also, i saw a static pressure probe in the duct on the roof where the person was taking measurements for fan failure test. I have also noticed a static pressure sensor located in the exhaust duct at the interstitial fevel where it turns before it goes up to the roof. Do you what these two static pressure sensors do? Exactly which sensor controls the modulating bypass damper? This sequence describes a makeup air damper. I am not aware of a makeup air damper. Do you know if this exists and where it is? The sequence states that if a pair of exhaust fans fail the BAS will shut down its respective AHU and the static pressure set point shall be 35% of active static pressure set point and that set point to be determined by the system balancer. Is this what we want test and balance to accomplish? Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 case: mass-sac? Call: 404-325-5332? Fax: email: From: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCKOCOOJBFD) Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 9:29 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: RE: P2009453 File: From: Moss, Karen (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 8:42 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: P2009453 Ken, $331-$208 fy?ymhavethesequence of controltcr fan The control sequence on the drawings is not up to date. Thanks in advance for your help. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: wa4ss-ssar Cell: 404-32%32? Fax: TED-4334837 email: KMossI?cdcgov Maths, Chester (encrocooi'oseej From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 3:49 PM To: Raymond, George Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole1 Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: P2009453 George, I need someone to tell me what type of sensor is in the duct on the roof and what it?s function is. We will make sure we get a review scheduled before documents are sent to P60. lam not at a point where lean tie down a date to meet. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: i'm?400330? Cell: 404?825?632? Fax: i?m?480266? email: Moss 1 @cdcgov From: Raymond, George Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:41 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDQOCOOJBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 I'm not 100% sure about the high pressure cutoff. in a conversation with Roman, there is no high pressure cutoff on the exhaust fans in i am sure that the static pressure is controlled in the interstitial. In a conversation with Chades Daniels, DEMO will not be providing a design with traditional drawing and a speci?cation. instead the project will be executed as a SOC. This allows the contractor to proceed with the project with a general narrative and an understanding of the customers eXpectation. I mention to Charles that if this is going to be a SOC and since there will not be any design documents, we need to have a final review with OHS, DEMO, FMEO and Willis mechanical to make sure we all understand the scope of work that Willis will be performing. i'm notsure if this review is included in the schedule that you finalized with Willis mechanical. non the less, we need to have a review before the project gets fonivarded on to P60. The original schedule called for a 30 review starting on June 30. We all agree that a 30 day review is not needed. Per Charles the project is scheduled to go to PGO on August 1. Can we meet the week of July '19 to perform a ?nal review of the project scope before it goes to George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ODIDCOOIBFOIFMEO Of?ce: 4044339-3335 Cell: 404691-2599 Fax: 404-639-1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-o4 From: Moss, Karen To: Raymond, George Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Fri Jul 09 11:13:16 2010 Subject: FW: P2909453 George, The purpose ofthis e-mail is to confirm our conversation yesterday. We retrieved the Johnson Shop Drawing Control Drawings offthe server. The duct static pressure sensor that controls the modulating bypass damper is believed to be located in the interstial space not at the roof. You believe the probe at the roof to be a duct pressure sensor if duct pressure increases too much; however this is not mention in the control sequence and needs to be verified. The makeup damper is the same thing as the modulating bypass damper. to accomplish. Best Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 39333 Of?ce: 77?0433-330? Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: email: KMossi i From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) 3 Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 12:47 PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: RE: P2009453 Ken. Thank you for the sequence. I have a couple of questions. This sequence states that outside air bypass damper wili modulate to maintain plenum static pressure set point. As far as I know there is not static pressure sensor in the pienum; is that correct? Also. I saw a static pressure probe in the duct on the roof where the person was taking measurements for'fan failure test. I have also noticed a static pressure sensor located in the exhaust duct at the interstitial level where it turns before it goes up to the roof. Do you what these two static pressure sensors do? Exactly which sensor controls the modulating bypass damper? This sequence describes a makeup air damper. I am not aware of a makeup air damper. Do you know if this exists and where it is? The sequence states that if a pair of exhaust fans fail the BAS will shut down its respective AHU and the static pressure set point shall be 35% of active static pressure set point and that set point to be determined by the system balancer. Is this what we want test and balance to accomplish? Regards. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Attanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Hoses-sac? Deli: 404325632? Fax: ??0?438?250?? email: KMoss @cdcgov From: Walpole; Kanneth K. Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 9:29 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Daniels, Charles E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 File: From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 8:42 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Kenyou have the sequence of control for fans rril 1? 3' The control sequence on the drawings is not up to date. Thanks in advance for your help. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce Clifton Road NE. MS Attanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Ce1l: 404325-632? Fax: email: KMc-ssl Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Raymond, George Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:41 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Proust, Paul E. Subject: Re: P2009453 I'm not 100% sure about the high pressure cutoff. in a conversation with Roman, there is no high pressure cutoff on the exhaust fans in . am sure that the static pressure is controlled in the interstitial. In a conversation with Charles Daniels, DEMO will not be providing a design with traditional drawing and a specification. Instead the project will be executed as a SOC. This allows the contractor to proceed with the project with a general narrative and an understanding of the customers expectation. I mention to Charles that if this is going to be a SOC and since there will not be anyr design documents, we need to have a final review with DHS. DEMO, FMEO and Willis mechanical to make sure we all understand the scope of work that Willis will be performing. I'm not sure if this review is included in the schedule that you ?nalized with Willie mechanical, non the less, we need to have a review before the project gets forwarded on to PGO. The original schedule called for a 30 review starting on June 30. We all agree that a 30 day review is not needed. Per Charles the project is scheduled to go to P60 on August 1. Can we meet the week of July 19 to perform a final review of the project scope before it goes to George K. Raymond DeputyI Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ODIOCOOIBFOIFMEO Of?ce: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404-639-1685 Email: ghr6@cdo.gov Mail stop: F404 From: Moss, Karen To: Raymond, George Cc: Daniels. Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Fri Jul 09 11:13:16 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 use. 262a(h) George, The purpose of this e-mail is to confirm our conversation yesterday- We retrieved the Johnson Shop Drawing Control Drawings offthe server. The duct static pressure sensor that controls the modulating bypass damper is believed to be located in'the interstial sace not at the roof. You believe the probe at the roof to be a duct pressure sensor : 42 U-S-C- duct pressure increases too much; however this is not mention in the control sequence and needs to be verified. The makeup damper is the same thing as the modulating bypass damper. 1 to accomplish. Best Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: arc-433.330? Cell: trusses-532? Fax: 77'0-488-265? email: KMossl @cdc.gov From: Moss, Karen (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday;July 02, 2010 12:47 PM To: Walpolel Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Danielsr Charles E. Subject: RE: P2009453 Ken, Thank you for the sequence. have a couple of questions. This sequence states that outside air bypass damper #1 will modulate to maintain plenum static pressure set point. As far as I know there is not static pressure sensor in the plenum; is that correct? Also, I saw a static pressure probe in the duct on the roof where the T86 person was taking measurements for fan failure test. 1 have also noticed a static pressure sensor located in the exhaust duct at the interstitial level where it turns before it goes up to the roof. Do you what these two static pressure sensors do? Exactly which sensor controls the modulating bypass damper? This sequence describes a makeup air damper. i am not aware of a makeup air damper. Do you know if this exists and where it is? The sequence states that if a pair of exhaust fans fail the BAS will shut down its respective AHU and the static pressure set point shall be 35% of active static pressure set point and that set point to be determined by the system balancer. Is this what we want test and balance to accomplish? Regards, Karen Moss FEE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-02 5-632? Fax: email: KMoss] @cdc.gcv (b?agdgc?ushaee. the sequence tan-s From: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 9:29 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCXOCODJBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: RE: P2009453 File: EF1?21?Seqof0ps.pdf From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 8:42 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Subject: P2009453 Ken, The control sequence on the drawings is not up to date. Thanks in advance for your help. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: erases?sac? Cell: 404-525-5327 Fax: email: KMess?l @cdogov [7 m? . Mattie, Chester From (coalocoorOSHE) Sent - To: 'Im'smusc Wail?? Zar?nbutol Laura . Williams, Allison (coerciomcezm); Howard. William (Bill) - 8 (cosiocooilOSHE) Cc: - - - 2?5 Proust. Paul E. (sociocooeFO); Moss, Karen icocrocoOieFO); Phillips, Roman - (CTR) Subject: RE: work in Vivarium this Wednesday Karen has changed the testing to Thursday Her to its will begin setting up on the HEPA ?oor around 2 am. Roman and an ARB person will need to go into the around 8 am and begin setting up. ARB can be ?nished by 9 am and pictures can then be taken. There will be no pictures taken before 9 am or until ARB has given the all clear. Same signage system establish by radiation safety must be up through-out the area. If there does need to be an entry into one of the animals rooms some accommodation can be made between pictures. ARES wiil escort in the AM and Jeff Sheppard will escort in the afternoon. Any issues let us know. Thanks I Sent: Tuesda Jul 2010 8:55 AM To: llama Zambuto, Laura R. (cociororlilcrso); Williams, Allison (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Subject: RE: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday If we need to do it on Thursday, it would have to be after 9am. This gives us time to do our animals checks and changes. Ibil? tRenters for Disease Control and Prevention From: Monda July 25, 2010 3:32 PM Tu: Zambuto, Laura R. Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocoojoHS) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday Posey, James E. Williams, Allison Can we do it Thursday? From: ibti3t42i'5r3-52'328'h Posey, James E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) CC: Sent: Mon Jul 26 14:49:22 2010 Subject: RE: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday I was in the vivarium infecting mice for our pathogenesis studies. On Wednesday we have 48 hr sacrifice. We will enter in TE room at 7.30 am and should be done by 11.30 AM. We need to go in the morning $33,342 USE. 252-3 H15 (in vivarium] because we homogenize organs in the afternoon to plate for MTB CFU count at ou Can the proposed WOFK be done after 11.30 Please let us know. Thanks . (CDCIOIDINCZVED) Sent: Monday, July 25, 2010 1:Subject: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday and James, This Wednesday. OHS and Engineering is interested in doing some testing in the Vivarium and need to have access to the central corridor without the programs working in their assigned areas. They would need to have a window from around ?:00am to 2:00pm to do this work and would like to ?nd out what TB's schedule is like and it your groUp could postpone work until 2:00pm. That does not mean than you could not get into your animal room earlier and do some work, itjust means it would need to be coordinated. So please reply to all regarding what your access needs are this Wednesday in the Vivarium. . [1:16:42 US [3 ?2I32a Ih} ID Ll 2E2aih Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: cocroromoezm) Sent: Tuesda Jul 2? 20108:-aura R. Williams, Allison (CDCIOID Howard. William (Bill) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Moss. Karen Phillips, Roman (CTR) Subject: RE: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday if we need to do it on Thursday, it would have to be after Qam. This gives us time to do our animals checks and changes. I'tlhi?' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention From: . (cocxocooronm Sent: Monda July 26, 2010 3:32 PM To: Zambuto, Laura R. Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIUCDOKOH Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Subject: Re: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday I'Dil3?242 Ll SC . 252'th Posey, James E. Williams, Allison Can we do it Thursday? (coo/oromcaasna) . Posey, James E. Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Mon Jul 26 14:49:27 2010 Subject: RE: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday From To I was in the vivarium infecting mice for our pathogenesis studies. On Wednesday we have 48 hr sacrifice. We will enter in TB room at 7.30 am and should be done by 11.30 AM. We need to go in the morning (in vivarium) because we homogenlze organs in the afternoon to plate for MTB CFU count at our proposed work be done after 11.30 Please let us know. Thanks Itlj-iE From: this div-5L" small? (CDCXOIDINCZVED) Sent: Honda July 26,r 010 1:52 PM Posey, James E. (morocco/0H5); Probst, Paul E. I I Subject: work in Vivarium this Wednesday I I 'szr?i land Ihh?': This Wednesday, OHS and Engineering is interested in doing some testing in the Vivarium and need to have access to the central corridor without the programs working in their assigned areas. They would need to have a window from around ?:DDam to 2:00pm to do this work and would like to ?nd out what schedule is like and if your group could postpone work until 2:00pm. That does not mean than you could not get into yoUr animal room earlier and do some work. itjust means it would need to be coordinated. So please reply to all regarding what your access needs are this Wednesday in the Vivarium. ?3133242 use. 2523 ITI- [n.IEli42 2:32am:- US 262301} Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: Jul 26 2010 3:35 PM To: I ma} James E. Zambuto, Laura R. Williams, Allison Howard, Will (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Co: Probst. Paul E. Subject: RE: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday We are not entering yiyarium on Thursday. For TB Thursday is ?ne. Please note that we still will have infected mice in TE room. Thanks 2523Ili: From: (sociocooxoriS) Sent: Mon a: none,- I Howard, William (Bill) Co: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday da July 26, 2010 3:32 PM We? Posey, James E. Williams, Allison Can we do it Thursday? From: To: Poseyr James E. P) Cc: (sociocoomHS); Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Mon Jul 26 14:49:22? 2010 Subject: RE: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday 252mm I was in the Vivarium infecting mice for our pathogenesis studies. On Wednesday we have 48 hr sacri?ce. We will enter in TB room at 7.30 am and should be done by 11.30 AM. We need to go in the morning Can the (in yiyarium) because we homogenize organs in the afternoon to plate for MTB CFU count at so proposed work be done after 11.30 Please let us know. Thanks 0.5.0. 252ail1; Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 1:52 PM Ta:l mile Posey, James E. Cc:l . . . Probst, Paul E. Subject: work in Vivarium this Wednesday mud- an: This Wednesday, OHS and Engineering is interested in doing some testing in the Vivarium and need to have access to the central corridor without the programs working In their assigned areas. They would need to have a window from around ?:00am to 2:00pm to do this work and would like to ?nd out what schedule is like and if your group could postpone work until 2:00pm. That does not mean than you could not get into your animal room earlier and do some work, itjust means it would need to be coordinated. So please reply to all regarding what your access needs are this Wednesday in the Vivarium. EliE-Z-IIhli Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: (occrocoorosr-IE) Itrlonda1 Jul 26, 2010 3:32 PM It-v?: [brraz Pusey. James E. (CDCJOIDIN Zambuto, Laura R. (coeroiur Williams, Allison Howard, Wit lam (Bill) (CDCJOCOOIOSHE) Probst, Paul E. Re: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday love: Can we do it Thursday? Fro Ihil?- HSTP) To: use. 252mm Posev, James E. Cc: 59:" g-E?g Probst, Paul E. (cocrocooraFO) Sent: Mon Jul 26 14:49:27? 2010 Subject: RE: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday Ib:r3_i:42 5- 252-3 Ihi I was in the vivarium infecting mice for our pathogenesis studies. On Wednesday we have 48 hr sacri?ce. We will enter in TB room at 7130 am and should be done by 11.30 AM. We need to go in the morning (in vivarium) because we homogenize organs in the afternoon to plate for CFU count at our Can the proposed work be done after 11.30 Please let us know. Than (CDCIOCOOIOHS): Probst, Paul E. Subject: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday This Wednesday. OHS and Engineering is interested in doing some testing in the Vivarium and need to have access to the central corridor without the programs working in their assigned areas. They would need to have a window from around ?:00am to 2:00pm to do this work and would like to find out what TEl's schedule is like and it your group could postpone work until 2:00pm. That does not mean than you could not get into your animal room earlier and do some work. it just means it would need to be coordinated. So please reply to all regarding what your access needs are this Wednesday in the Vivarium. LI SE. 5 2523111: LI SC. 25:23:11: Mathe, Chester (CDCIDCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday. July 30. 2010 3:43 PM To: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) RE: Firempipe in?. as builts U.S.C-: 26 Monday. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 3:07 PM To: F'robstr Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) in as builts .S . 26 Paul, I just want to make sure this doesn?t slip through the cracks. We promised the mechanical contractor we would provide this. Do you know when we can get this done? Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS 14-9? Atlanta. Georgla 30333 Of?ce: 770?433-330? Cell: 404-325-5312? Fax: 770-438-256? email: KMoss?l (Econ.ng "lathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: I Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 10:17 AM To: Probst Paul E. Subject: U-S- Vivarium HVAC Project a 25 Paul, I still need to generate the letter to tell DSAT ventilation project, but I?m hesitant to do so until we the know the schedule has been ?nalized. Canyeu'tell me when the schedule will be ?nalized and provide me with a copy of it to include with my subm 1' - ard from someone that we were supposed to have the ?nal schedule at this week's HOG meeting, butl has just indicated that it?s still not ?nalized. l?ll also need to indicate what the scope of work for the project will be in my letter, so if you can give me a paragraph describing the project, I would sincerer appreciate it. Regards, m? 3):42 03:12:42 2?2alhj Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Zambuto. Laura R. (CDCIOIDINCIRD) Sent: Tuesda Jul 27 I To: (coolomlucszm) Williams, Howard. William (Bill) I I OOIOSHE) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Phillips, Roman (CTR) Subject: RE: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday we will stay out of the Vivarium on Thursday. Laura From: (cocxocooroHS) Sert- Tuesrl July 2010 9:1? AM To: lhll?i its: Zambuto, Laura R. Will ams, Allison Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Phillips, Roman (CDCJOCOOJBFO) (CTR) Subject: RE: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday has changed the testing to Thursda . Her folks will begin setting up on the HEPA floor around 7 am. Roman and an ARB person will need to go into the 3 :42 around 8 am and begin setting up. can be ?nished by 9 am and pictures can then be taken. There will be no pictures taken before 9 am or until ARB has given the all clear. Same signage system establish by radiation safety must be up through-out the area. if there does need to be an entry into one of the animals rooms some accommodation can be made between pictures. ARB will escort in the AM and Jeff Sheppard will escort in the afternoon. Any issues let us know. Thanks From: Sent: Tuesda Jul 2010 8:55 AM . To: (cocxocooroasn - - Zambuto, Laura R. Williams, Allison Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOJOHS) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Moss, Karen Phillips, Roman (CTR) Subject: RE: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday US Cl 252arh: if we need to do it on Thursday, it would have to be after 0am. This gives us time to do our animals checks and changes. [blLEl NCPECiolosalARs - - D'sease Control and Prevention (cocrocooroam uiv 26,2010 3:32 PM From: . Sent: Monday, To: Zambuto, Laura R. Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCDDIOHS) Posev, James E. Williams, Allison Cc: Prohst, Paul E. (CDCIDCODIBFO) Subject: Re: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday Can we do it Thursday? From: - - F?oseyI James E. a new F?robs?rr Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Mon Jul 26 14:49:23? 2010 Subject: RE: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday 42 C. 262a in: was in the vivarium infecting mice for our pathogenesis studies. On Wednesday we have 48 hr sacri?ce. We will enter in TB room at 7.30 am and should be done by 11.30 AM. We need to go in the morning (in vivarium) because we homogenize organs in the afternoon to plate for MTB CFU count at ou 'm'a 3? 2523'? Can the proposed work be done after 11.30 Please let us know. Thanks . Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 1:52 PM To: mum Posey, James E. Cc: a Hm Probst, Paul E. (CDC/ocooraso) Subject: TB work in Vivarium this Wednesday This Wednesday, OHS and Engineering is interested in doing some testing in the Vivarium and need to have access to the central corridor without the programs working in their assigned areas. They would need to have a window from to 2:00pm to do this work and would like to ?nd out what TB's schedule is like and if your?group could postpone work until 2:00pm. That does not mean than you could not get into your animal room eartier and do some work, it just means it would need to be coordinated. So please reply to at! regarding what your access needs are this Wednesday in the Vivarium. truth-12 USE Eu Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Prohst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 9:45 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2000453 Karen: In Speci?cations PDF, Control Sequence, Item is this correct? Upon drop in exhaust duct static below (adj) below setpoint. an alarm shall be generated. Thanks, Paul 404-839-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 8:50 AM To: Mickle, Lenore (CDCIOCOOIPGO) Cc: Harris, Teresa Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Lingler, Arthur R. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Milby, Stephen C. . Subject: P2009453 Lenore, Please see attached RFC. File: RFC.pdf File: 2009453 A201.pdf File: 2009453 A101.pdf File: be File: Appendix.pdf so File: TEMPLATE - Document Tracking Logxls Best Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770400330? Cell: 1404-0256132? Fax: Tim-403265? email: mm Mattie, Chester From: Sent To: Go: Subject: [bill?3'; and Bill, Mose, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) P2000453 New Automatic Door iI .Monda Auuet 16. 2010 12:23 PM I Howard. William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Probet, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO il Steve (CDCIOCOOIBFO) lltli.i3:dg ??iini U-S-C- (I ?l Upon power failure how should this door fail? Opened or closed? Regards, Karen Moss FEE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Nil?430830? Cell: 404-35532? Fax: 770-438-256? email: 53.33551 omega; Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 12:35 PM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Co: Probst. Paul E. Rile Steve Subject: Re: P2009453 New Automatic Doori i would say This would ensure an additional physical barrier remains in place upon a power failure. But there should be some kind of on it in case some does need to pass through during a failure. Thanks . From: Moss Karen Howard, William (Bill) (CDCJOCUOIDHS) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Riley, Steve Sent: Mon Aug 16 12:22:33 2010 Subject: P2009453 New Automatic Doori (bii3ii42 U-S-C- 2m?- Pat and Bill, Upon power failure how should this door fail? Opened or closed? Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's TechnicaI Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: noose-330? Cell: 404-825-602? Fax: news-zoo? email: [aindcgov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 2:41 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 yes Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: car; 4o4-szs-sazr Fax: 770-483-266? email: KMossi?cgc-v From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 9:45 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Karen: In Speci?cations PDF, Control Sequence, Item is this correct? Upon drop in exhaust duct static below 10'5" (adj) below setpoint, an alarm shall be generated. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0 505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 8:50 AM To: Mickie, Lenore Cc: Harris, Teresa Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Lingier, Arthur R. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Milby, Stephen C. (CDCKOCDOIBFD) Subject: P2009453 Lenore, Please see attached RFC. File: RFC.pdf File: 2009453 A201.pdf File: 2009453 A101.pdf >5 File: File: Appendixpdf File: TEMPLATE - Document Tracking Log.xls Best Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Nil-433630? Cell: 4041-3256321? Fax: arc-433.255? email: ggv. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday. August 16. 2010-15001 PM To: Walpole. Kenneth K. Raymond, George Subject: FW: P2009453 Would this not generate an alarm at the very slightest fluctuation of pressure? I assume since it is adjustable, we can change it later. Thanks, Paul 404-539-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, August 15, 2010 2:41 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 yes Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS l?ltlanta1 Georgia 30333 Office: muss?330? Cell: 404?325?532? Fax: 170-438-2507 email: Mm From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 9:45 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Karen: In Speci?cations PDF, Control Sequence, Item is this correct? Upon drop in exhaust duct static below 1175" {adj} below setpoint, an alarm shall be generated. Thanks, Paul 404-539-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 8:50 AM To: Mickle, Lenore Cc: Harris, Teresa Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Lingler, Arthur R. Probst,r Paul E. Raymond, George Milby, Stephen C. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Lenore, Please see attached RFC. File: RFC.pdf 5: File: 2009453 A201.pdf ?3 File: 2009453 A101.pclf ?on: File: File: Appendixpdf File: TEMPLATE - Document Tracking Log.xls Best Raga rds, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1000 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-6327 Fax: 770-433-2557 email: EMossl Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEPJ From: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Monday. August ?16, 2010 4:15 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Subject: Re: P2009463 You are correct. However, I suggest you contact the design engineer if it goes into alarm. From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFO) To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Mon Aug 16 16:01:13 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 Would this not generate an alarm at the very slightest fluctuation of pressure? I assume since it is adjustable, we can change it later. Thanks, Paul 404-639~0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 2:41 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: P2009453 yes Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770435-330? Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: 770-433-255? email: Waco: From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 9:45 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Karen: In Speci?cations PDF, Control Sequence, Item is this correct? Upon drop in exhaust duct static below (adj) below setpoint, an alarm shall be generated. Thanks. Paul 404?639-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 8:50 AM To: Mickie, Lenore (CDCIOCOOIPGO) Cc: Harris, Teresa (CDCIOCOOXPGO): Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Lingler, Arthur R. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIUCODIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Lenore, Please see attached RFC. File: RFC.pdf File: 2009453 A201.pdf File: 2009453 AlDl.pdf)> File: File: Appendixpdf File: TEMPLATE Document Tracking Logxls Best Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1800 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 404-825-6321? Fax: email: KMocsi?cdcgov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Prob-st, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) ber 09. 2010 7'29 AM VHU COPE 92009453 SOW.docx U. 2962 .U. a EU ttaohed is a short scope summary for the upcoming project to modify,. air flow in the Vivarium area. Sorry for the delinquency. Please advise if there are any questions. Paul Probst. PE Asst. Din, Operations BFDIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 l.Ciell: 404-285-2560 P2009453 HVAC Modi?cations to The cxi'sti'ng' Bui?l?dinngVivar-ium consists of eight Holding Rooms, each of which has an 3 2 Procedure com. The Vivarium also has two additional Procedure Rooms, 3 f. Room, and support spaces, including a dirty cage staging area, and showering and ownin rooms The Holding Rooms are arranged in two rows of four separated by a common .. . The current air balance relationship is such that the Procedure Rooms U-S-C- 2 a Clean Corridor, Holding Rooms are negative to the Procedure Rooms, and the ?3?42 Us? is negative to the Holding Rooms. 262mm- 262ath The see of this project will alter the air ?ow arrangement that the existing - will he made positive; therefore, no longer be called a but affgreyl.? 26 Corridor. Therefore, the Holding Rooms will be negative to both its associated Procedure Room, U-S-C- 25 and the new ?grey? Corridor. The improvement will eliminate the collective mixing of Holding (blt3li4Z Room U.s.c. 26 . The scope of work to accomplish this modi?cation includes partial removal of exhaust air in the dirty cage staging area, adding supply air in the existing - (new ?grey? certi?es), rebalancing all rooms as necessary. Architectural modi?cations include rcmovin existing door U-S-C- 26 (bll3li42 -- which separates existing Clean Corridor from the existing . U-S-C- 26opening Will be ?lled with concrete masonry and a new window. A new concrete masonryr wall 25 will be installed to separate the new ?grey? corridor from the existing dirty cage staging area. A new ?ber reinforced polyester door will be installed in this wall. use. 25280?) P2009453 HVAC Modifications existing Building Vivarium consists of eight Holding Rooms, each of which has an 23m) associated Procedure Room. The Vivarium also has two additional Procedure Rooms, a .. 5* com, and support spaces, including a dirty cage staging area, and showering and gow?'rng rooms. The Holding Rooms are arranged in two rows of four separated by a common . The current air balance relationship is such that the Procedure Rooms (mwmz U333: are neative to a mean L0. rider, Holding Rooms are negative to Procedure Rooms, and the U30 252a(?) is negative to the Holding Rooms. 262ath) (mwii?iz The sec of this project will alter the air ?ow arrangement such that the existing will be made positive; therefore, no longer be called a b1? a ?grey, Corridor. Therefore, the Holding Rooms will be negative to both its associated ProcedureRoom, {may 42 and the new ?grey? Corr'dor. The imnrovemcnt will eliminate the collective. mixing of Holding Room air in .. ..- 2523?01) The scope of work to accomplish this modi?cation includes artial removal of exhaust air in the dirty cage staging area, adding supply air in the existing I - .(newu?fgref corridor), and rebalancing all rooms as necessary. Architectural modi?cations inclu a (b)[3)142 which separates existing Clean Corridor from the existing and the 2523i?) 30- ,o'penmg wr be ?lled with concrete masonry and a new window. A new concrete masonry wall 262ail1) will be installed to separate the new ?grey? corridor from the existing dirty cage staging area, A new ?ber reinforced polyester (FRP) door will be installed in this wall. use. 262a(h) Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFQ Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 8:42 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Lingler. Arthur R. Subject: P2009453 Progress Karen: Just left a voice mail message. Was calling to see where we steed on getting Willis the NTP, and any impacts to schedule. Going to a HOG meeting this morning. and checking to see if any updates to share. lb]le Currently. the program's schedule look like this. will shut down operations in the Basement Level - labs so that OHS can deem the labs the ?rst week of October (Oct. 4-8). The following 2 V: - 3 weeks will be used for annual maintenance. will move back into the space and out of the Vivarium at the end of October to clear the Vivarium for de?con the ?rst week of November. As we move forward on this?project. would ydu two be open to a quickie 15 minute phone call everv'other Tuesday for a brie?ng on status prior to the HOG meeting? Thanks, Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir., Operations BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFOJ Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:40 PM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Progress Karen; Thanks for update this morning. Obviously, there are several activities contingent on the Willis schedule. When you get the revised proposal, with their schedule, can you pass it on? - Also, I wil[ setup a Calendar Notice for Art, yourself, endl to conference call every couple weeks. Thanks. Paul 404453943505 From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 8:42 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Co: Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: P2009453 Progress Karen: Just left a voice mail message. Was calling to see where we stood on getting Willis the NTP. and any impacts to schedule. Going to a HOG meeting this morning. and checking to see if any updates to share. [hair-12 U5 C. 202th} Currently, the program's schedule look like this. will shut down operations in the Basement Leve labs so that OHS can de~con the labs the ?rst week of October (Oct. The following 2 v; 3 weeks will be used for annual maintenance. will move back into the space and out of the Vivarium at the end of October to clear the Vivarium for de-con the ?rst week of November. As we move forward on this project, would you two be open to a quickie 15 minute phone call every other Tuesday for a brie?ng on status prior to the HOG meeting? Thanks, Paul Prob-st, PE Asst. Din, Operations BFOfFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Office 404639-0505 Cell: 404-285?2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, September 09, 20?] 0 4:20 PM To: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Lingler. Arthur R. Subject: RE: P2009453 Progress Sure when we get a good schedule I will pass it along. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: T704BE-030T Cell: 404?825?632? Fax: "rm-488266? email: ?llings] From: Probet,r Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:40 PM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Progress Karen; Thanks for update this morning. Obviously, there are several activities contingent on the Willis schedule. When you get the revised proposal, with their schedule, can you pass it on? Also, I will setup a Calendar Notice for Art. yourself. and I to conference call every couple weeks. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 8:42 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: P2009453 Progress Karen: Just left a voice mail message. Was calling to see where we stood on getting Willis the NTP. and any impacts to schedule. Going to a HOG meeting this morning, and checking to see if any Updates to share. I [tili3i 42 US Cl Currently, the program?s schedule look like this. will shut down operations in the Basement Leve labs so that OHS ca -con the labs the ?rst week of October (Oct. The following 2 1/2 - 3 weeks will be used for annual maintenance. will move back into the space and out of the Vivarium at the end of October to clear the Vivarium for de-con the ?rst week of November. As we move forward on this project, would you two be open to a quickie 15 minute phone call every other Tuesday for a brie?ng on status prior to the HOG meeting? Thanks, Paul Probst, PE Asst. Din, Operations BFOiFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 9:34 AM To: Jones Joanne J. . .. Scone U.S.C. 262a E-- - - If you can hang on until Wednesday, we expect to have a schedule that is binding by contract, and notjust a ore-bid expectation. Right now, we expect work to start early November, and be complete early December, but would prefer to offer you more exact dates. Thanks, Paul 404-539-0505 (bll3)i4_2 U-S-C- Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 723? AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium Scope Paul. I apologize for not responding sooner on been out of the office on leave. This looks good, but I'll also need to provide a time-line for the project to DSAT as well. Please provide me with the latest time-line for the start and completion of this project. Many thanks in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, usc. 262aih) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 ?:29 AM U.S.C. To: Subject: Vivarium Scope File: P2009453 sowdocx .. Sic 26 Attached is a short scope summary for the upcoming project to modify air flow in the Vivarium area. Sorry for the delinquency. Please advise if there are any questions. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir., Operations BFOlFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404?639-0505 Cell: 4042852560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: -- Monday, eptember13, 2010 9:47 AM To: U-S-C- 25 Probst, ul E. (coprocoorsFoi Subject: RE: lviivarium Scope Thanks, Paul. i can wait on this until Wednesday. i appreciate it! U.S.C. 2'62'aih) From: Prohst,r Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 9:Subject: RE: Vivarium Scope 2625101) use. '262aih')" if you can hang on until Wednesday, we expect to have a schedule that is binding by contract, and notjust a pro-bid expectation. Right now, we expect work to start early November, and be complete early December, but would prefer to offer you more exact dates. Thanks, Paul use. 404639-0505 252st?) Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: Vivarium Scope Paul, I apologize for not reaponding sooner on this-ui?ve been out of the office on leave. This looks good1 but i'Jl also need to provide a time-line for the project to DSAT as well. Please provide me with the latest time-line for the start and completion of this project. Many thanks in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, use. 2625101) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Se t: Thursdav. Senternber 09, 2010 229 AM {13Mde .. -- - - U-S- Eja?: Vivarium Scope File: P2009453 Attached is a short scope summary for the upcoming project to modify air ?ow in the Vivarium area. Sorry for the delinquency. Please advise if there are any questions. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Din, Operations BFOlFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Thursda . Seternber23, 2010 11:26 AM To: (CDCIOCOOIOSHB Co: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: Vivarium Shutdown Pat: If De-con for Vivarium starts November 1, when can oontraotorstart? Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir.,_ Operations BFOIFaoilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Mathe, Chester From: . (CDCIOCOOIOSHEJ Sent: Thursday, September 23. 2010 12:49 PM To: Probst. Paul E. Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHEJ Subject: RE: Vivarium Shutdown Charles and Tonya were told that we would need 1 day for facility decon and they could start entering the next day. But we would also need 2 days for HEPA housing decontamination. From: Proust, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursda Se tember 23, 2010 11:26 AM To: (cocrocooloSHE) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: Vivarium Shutdown Pet: if De-con for Vivarium starts November 1, when can contractor start? Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir., Operations ElFOtFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404?639-0505 Cell: 404-235-2560 TO: hments: Will?): - I I Ew- (bli3l'4 262aih . . Building a 2523 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 5:34 PM Bowen, Ken I Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) - Shutdown Schedule Documentpd Push back from on Vivarium shutdown schedule. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 Message--?-- From: Sent: Monday, OctOberZS, 2010 3:49 PM To: Howard, William Probst, Paul E. {coqocoo/aeo)" divarium Shutdown Schedule Original Message {cocrmomcrno o: Zamhuto, Laura R. Sentz'Mon Oct 25 15:07:35'2010 Ivariurn Shutdown Schedule ..- . 5.0. 262aih:- Fyi. From: (CDCIOIDINCIRD) Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:31 PM To: Tanya A. Daniels, Charles E. Cc: Katz, Jackie iva riurn Shutdown Schedule ?2EEai Hello, Attached is a signed letter from the Influenza Division addressing the Building ssheduIe-.-Tindb-ngl original will be sent by interoffice mail. Thank you, Andy Andrea Adgie, MBA Management and Program Analyst Carter Consulting, Inc. Immunology.I and Pathogenesis Branch. U5 2132-:1lh" Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30333 Tel: 404?539?0?96 Fax: 404?539?2350 eta-?Ma? 3%5 he may? in: ?Mac Date From ibll3} 42 To lblt3i-42 262mm") a?g?tiyu?c sfpifzf OF HEALTH 8; HUMAN SERVICES- Public Health Service and Prevention Centers for Disease Control Memorandum October 13. 2010 Icii? --*Fhe-animat - Baildin'leiVarium sh tdown schedule Charles ariurn facility in ssheduled lob . I 'ted beginning-on November 1. for annual'maintanance-and air?ow reversat for the. 5525. h; BFO has increased the projected time for the work and currentiy the laboratory space is scheduled to be unavailable for use for 2.5 months, from November 2010 to February'16, 2011. Thain" uses two animal holding rooms "and-two . space for ferrets A loss of this magnitude for 2.5 months will have a substantial impaction the research-and reagent production responsibilities of thivis'ionl mile :12 :3 'll - . "ea iruses in clinical specimens endemic strains. Wears responsible for testing the" safety and ef?cacy of new 'virus vaccines and for the-evaluation of the vinalence and transmis'sihility or . i [wiruses with pandemic potential using the ferret model system. wncility that house up 144 ferrets representing 5m unit'siz42 uses 2e2athl. (enema so. a aszeim We appreciate that the work scheduled for the Vivarium is important and extensive but a shutdown for 2.5 months is unacceptable because it will greatly impede ful?li manssibilities tasked to our Division. The-resent shutdown of our 25:23.15 Buildinas prolonged for an additional 3-4 weeks and we have not yet fully addressed the work backlog from that shutdown. We request that you reconsider the schedule and keep the shutdown period to the originally suggested 6-3 weeks. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 2:06 PM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Fw: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule IXOS CDC KB Attachments: piaceholder.tmp Heads up. ijr3l142 USE. To: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Nicholson, Janet OD Probst Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Howard, William (Bill) Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Sent: Thu Apr 22 13:55:00 2010 Subject: Vivarium project P2009453 schedule George, US in a HOG meeting held earlier today, Paul Probst presented a preliminary schedule for the Building ivarium air reversal project see attachment). Members of the HOG view the timing of the project to be completely unacceptable, and is nowhere close to the timeframe that was indicated in a March 3 memo to Paul (in which the HOG and OHS requested that the project move attached). In a meeting held on March 22, Ken Bowen offered up some solutions that could expedite the process, but evidently they were not incorporated into the planning. If the propc dnsoherji la is followed, the Vivarium would be shut down at an inopportune time for the programs utilizing the space ivision and TB) that could prove to be very disruptive. I believe that there are solutions to this problem, and that the project can be expedited it all options are considered. HOG members are available to meet with you to discuss the situation if you so choose. Ll 252mm Procurement and Construction Schedulexlsxee 42 USE. 262nm}: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, George (ODCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:42 PM To: Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. (CDOIOCOOJOSHE) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Khabbaz, Rima Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive Impedance: High .Jan I appreciate your concurrence. Ken, based on the OHS directive, with concurrence from the HOG, please proceed with the OHS Project Request. Thank you! (3.- From: Nicholson, Janet Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:32 PM To: Chandler, George Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Khabbaz, Rima Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive To follow Up on our conversation I am in no position to overrule an expert opinion from OHS about the project to change flow-in the -Bl:lrivarium. From my understanding, this is the best solution to the address the issue of ?2Wtainment in the vivarium, given the circumstances (time, money, other alternative solutions}. If needed, the Governance Council could be assembled to address the issue, but I would only do this if the issue could not be resolved in any other way. Jan Nicholson, OED Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:26 PM To: Gaunce, Jean A. Nicholson, Janet (CDCIOIDIOD) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George From: Chandler, George Subject: FW: P2009453 - HOG Directive Jean and Jan; Please ?nd attached a speci?c request from the HOG, si by . concerning a project request to address directional air flow in an area ofEIproxi-mate are familiar with the project, which is described in some detail in the attachments, and are aware of the apparent controversy surrounding the proposed solutions directional air?ow change with or without anterooms, in the simplest terms). i I am emailing you for your concurrence or non-concurrence with the proposal in Directive not that I am questioning the wisdom of the HOG at all: it?s simply that if there are major concerns that some views on this have not 1 been heard I do not want to get a major change order in the middle of the Project, or to have the issue inadvertently escalate to the 12"? floor without making sure that opposing views have been properly evaluated by the full HOG, or in accordance with the approval charter. - I understand that a speedy resolution of this issue is quite important just want to make sure that there is consensus on this or at least informed consent from the appropriate governance structure. Thanks! G, [bilfl I42 Ll ELIE. 252.3Ijl'u.- Below (pdf ?le) is the scanned copy of the directive signed Il?m not sure If HOG members were recipients of this directive. HOG members did receive a memo from later regarding the basis for design and construction of this project. I have attached it below. Thanks, Jeff digit-g? Lassie: MEMO Building-El Projectdor: File: HOG Directive 3-09-10.pdf All: Please see attached letter as requested by George Chandlerfrom HOG Manager @2523 to BFO with directive: to install scope as described. Please note window of duration (July 3-24) that is bein run autdown of Vivarium to accommodate the construction effort. Please push ahead to get things in place: FPAA and subsequent quick approval from OD, ?nalization of scope, market survey and preiiminary schedule from contractor. Please keep me apprised of activity as necessary to report back to HOG committee of current status. Thanks, Paul Probst. PE Asst. Din, Operations BFOiFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404?639-0505 Cell: 404-235-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIDCOOIDSEP) From: F'robst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday. October 13, 2010 11:05 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Ce: Raymond, George (CDDIOCOOIBFQ Subject: FW: . From: Daniels, Charles E. Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 1:06 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) Beitsch, Tanya A. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Bill: When the project was awarded it was transferred from a DEMO PO to a CIMD PD. Art Lingler is the END PO. Art is working directly with, and has responsibility for, the contractor now and we do not want to muddy the water with potentially outdated and/or partial information. Thank you From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 12:45 PM To: Tan a A. Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Tanya and Charles, Any information on the ?nal Vivarium schedule? William Howard Facility Safety Team Leader Of?ce of Safety, Health and Environment (DSHE) 404.639.21?4 673.614.7257 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: i 2528?? Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:24 AM Raymond, Probst, Paul E. . -. . . chments: Documentp ?3l5??i?.l is pushing back on DEMD's Vivarium schedule. May be a little too late. [$114 I Fro SE ?2E2allT Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:08 PM To:Zambuto, Laura K: .. Jivarium Shutdown Schedule ?262a (CDCIOCODIDSHE) Fyi. From: Adgie, Andrea L. (CTR) Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:31 PM To: Tanya A. Daniels, Charles E. Co: Katz, Jackie Vivarium Shutdown Schedule Hello, Willi? 3 Attached is a signed letterfrom the - Division addressing the shutdown "schedule. The original will be sent by interof?oe mail. Thank you, Andy Andrea Adgie, MBA Management and Program Analyst Carter Consulting, Inc. Immunology and Pathogenesis Branch runs-:42 use. a 252mm: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30333 Tel: 404-539-0796 Fax: 404-639-2350 Mathe, Chester (encrocomosee) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOJBFO) Sent: October 26, 2010 8:51 AM To: Irbrerdzus-s-szazarm cocrommcezm); Raymond, George (cocrocool'BFoi I Be: Howard, William {Bill} .. R.li;..0uilding I ivarium Shutdown Schedule Although it does not satisfy the 6?8 week suggestion, let me offer the following clarification to the schedule. The letter from incorrectly interprets the schedule as a completion date of February 15. While that is the overall construction completion date, the last weeks are preparation of Close-out documents, and the facility will be ready for move-in on January 29. Also, I am not sure how they interpreted the overall duration as 22/: months. Using the Nov. 1 Feb. 16 window, the duration would be 3 1/2 months. With January 29th as the move-in date, the overall duration now stands at 13 weeks. Thanks, Paul 4011-6390505 Message-m- an-l relay-42 a 252mm- Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:24 AM ggvmond. Georg ClocoorBFo); Probst, Paul E. g2 littlest: Fw: Building Vivarium Shutdown Schedule pushing back Bld'? Vivarium schedule. May be a little too late. El (CDCIOIDINCIRD) Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:08 PM TU: Zambuto, Laura mash-42 Llac 52,323?, {encrocooxosm} ?ghts-ct: "Build'in ivarium Shutdown Schedule Fyi. From: Adgie, (cm) Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:31 PM To: Tanva A. Daniels, Charles E. Cc: Kata, Jackie ivarium Shutdown Schedule Hello, Attached is a signed letter from the In?uenza Division addressing the Buildin original will be sent by interof?ce mail. Thank you, Andy Andrea Adgie, MBA Management and Program Analyst Carter Consulting, Inc. Immunology and Pathogenesis Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30333 Tel: 404-639-0795 Fax: 4041-6392350 (mom; use. Vivarium shutdown schedule. The ?2528lhl mathe, Chester (cocrocoomsee) From: i (CDCJOCOOJOSHE) Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 10:2 To: Paul George (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Cc: Howard, Wil' (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHB BuildingUIVivarium Shutdown Schedule a 2523i thus}. --Build?i-ng Thanks Paul. Obviously the 2.5 months is a typo. I believe they were reading the schedule using the February 16th date as you have indicated below. However, the end of the letter does clearly indicate would still like to go with the original schedule of 3 weeks which would allow them to get in sometime the ?rst week oflanuary and not the 13-week schedule for the end of January. Thanks El Message-?-- From: Pro-bet, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:51 AM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOXBFU) CC: 25:. Howard, William {Bill} [coo/ocoorosus} Shutdown Schedule [0162242 USE. 252mm Although it does not satisfy the 6-8 week suggestion, let me offEr the following clari?cation to the schedule. The letter from incorrectly interprets the schedule as a completion date of February 16. While that is the overall construction completion date, the last Zl?weeks are preparation of Close-out documents, and the facility will be ready for move-in on January 29. Also, i am not sure how they interpreted the overall duration as 21/: months. Using the Nov- 1 Feb. 16 window, the duration would he 3 1/5 months. With January 29th as the move?in date, the overall duration now stands-at 13 weeks. Thanks, Paul 404-539?0505 {CDC/oIo/chveo] Sent:.Tuesday, October 26, 2010 5:24 AM To: Raymond, George Probst, Paul E. ?livarium Shutdown Schedule 'pushl'ng'back schedule. May bea little too late. h- sat-p Fiinal M3553 s-s. miteH? (cocono/Ncmm Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:08 PM - fivariurn Shutdown Schedule Fvi. -??Original Message?--? From: Adgie, Andrea L. (CTR) . Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010-2131 PM To: Tanya A. Daniels, Charles E. Cc: Katz, Jackie I Jivarium Shutdown Schedule ?2623i Hello, . . a 42 Attached is.a signed letter from. the Influenza Division addressing'the 5 original will besent by interof?ce mail. Thank you, Management and Program Analyst Carter Consulting, Inc. Tel: 404?639-0?96 Fax: 404-639-2350 Andy Andrea Adgie, MBA To: nullsMathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 5:55 PM Bowen, Ken Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Shutdown Schedule FYI Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Howard, William {Bill} Sent: Tue Oct 26 10: '5 2010 Raymond, George Building ivarium Shutdown Schedule Thanks Paul. Obviously the 2.5 months is a typo. I believe they were reading the schedule using the February 16th date as you have indicated below. However, the end of the letter does clearly indicate would still like to go with the original schedule of 8 weeks which would allow them to get in sometime the first week ofJanuary and not the 13 week schedule for'the end ofJanuary. Thanks El m?Uriginal From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOUIBFD) Sent: Tuesda October 26, 2010 8:51 AM '42U-5-?3-?2523l?? Raymond, George Cc: 9 Ir Howard, William (Bill) (cocfocoofDSHE) Vivarium Shutdown Schedule Altho it does not satisfy the 5?8 week suggestion, let me offer the following clari?cation to the schedule. The letter from incorrectly interprets the schedule as a completion date of February 16. While that is the overall construction completion date, the last 216 weeks are preparation of Close-out documents, and the facility will be ready for move-in on January 29. I Also, I am not sure how they interpreted the overall duration as 21/: months. Using the Nov. 1 - Feb. 16 window, the duration would be 3 V2 months. With January 29th as the move-in date, the overall duration now stands at 13 weeks. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 Message-m- me; .Imr3_::42 use ?252em3 Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 5:24 AM To: Raymond, George Probst, Paul E. .- - r' wgi?e?t. Fw. Building wanum Shutdown Schedule rename u. wai?lhs on Bl-d Vivarium schedule. May be a little too late. Ill Message-?-- - J. To: Zamhuto, Laura {Pligl?gig?-Et: FW: .3. ulldin Fyi. I -ee--Original From: Adgie, Andrea L. (comma/memo) (cm) 5 Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:31 PM To: Tanya A. {cocxocoofaroh Daniels, Charles E. Cc: Katz, Jackie DCJOIDINCIRD) lbll3l1521lage?tc?uilding ivariurn Shutdown Schedule ?2623{ Hello(mole: US (3 Attached is a signed letter from the Dwmon addressing the Budding . wan-um-s-hutdown- g'aeaelm original will be sent by interoffice mail. Thank you, Andy Andrea Adgie, MBA Management and Program Analyst Carter Consulting, Inc. Immunolo and Pathogenesis Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30333 Tel: 404-639-0296 Fax: 404-639-2350 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2010 10:12 AM To: Raymond, George to OOIBFO) ,bnmzu SC ?ak Subject: FW1P2009453 Building {Egg vac Modi?cations to fyi Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404-639-3303 Office 404-639-0499 Fax From: Daniels, Charles E. Sent: Wednesday, October 2010 8:21 AM To: Cox, Nancy (CDCJOIDINCIRD) Cc: Chandler, George Mame?, James C. Bowen, Ken L. Tanya A. (CDCIOCOOIBFO Daniels, Charles E. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 Building Modi?cations to U-S-C- Dr. Cox and Colleagues: We appreciate you voicing-vour concerns related to the Building rvanum project. Various offices Wither BFD and P60 have spent considerable time, effort, and funding toward accomplishing the revisions to the vivarium spaces OSHE has requested. Several of?ces within BFO have been associated with the project. Paul Probst, with FM E0, is the BFO point of contact in .the HOG meetings and other situations. Our of?ce, DEMO, is responsible for the design of the project, incorporating the requirements of the requesting group de?ning the scope of work, and estimating the cost of the project. Once the project was awarded, the leadership of the project moved from DEMO to CIMO, with Art Lingler as the Construction Manager. The Contractor provides the cost and schedule when submitting the cost proposal for the project. We utilized the Solution Order Concept to reduce the length of time in the design portion of the project. This procurement method has the advantage of involving the Contractor through the design process, providing coordination and feedback between BFD and the Contractor. The current Contractor?s schedule reflects work being completed in the vivarium on January 27, 2011. We believe the February 16, 2011 date you referenced was mistakenly taken as the end of the shut down. Actually, it is the Contract Completion date. We are all working to reduce the vivarium?s down time as much as possible and the Contractor?s approved schedule may be based on actual time frames. What we do not want to do is to provide an artificially short time frame for construction, and then have to tell you the facility will not be ready on time, as'it seemed to happen in the Building 15 example your provided. The Contractor?s schedule is being reviewed by Art Lingler and our staff, as well as the Contractor's staff. The Contractor will revise the schedule to reflect actual work activity times. Hopefully, we will be able to turn the Vivarium back to you and your colleagues earlier than the scheduled date ofJanuary 27. Paul Probst has the responsibility to update during HOG meetings and is able to ask to be briefed by Art Lingler on the project?s progress. We have tried to provide the staff at CDC the most realistic schedule for this project without compromising the objectives of the project or the realities of the manufacturing and construction process. Thank you Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:41 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Raymond, George Subject The lProject In an interesting developmentl Mi? 3'15 2533'? I. has sent a Meeting invitation to discuss the status of the Vivarium project schedule. I am assuming they are wanting a ?rm commitment of the required shutdown time, and anything longer than 8-8 weeks will be unacceptable. The invites list includes: Paul Meechan, Bill Howard, Nancy COX. Shaw. GEDFQE Chandler. arid myself. Of course, Tony requests that invitations be extended to those who should be there in addition to his list. I have not met Nancy Cox, but have heard that she is not the kind of person who is going to accept "we are working on it, and we'll get back to you" as an answer. This meeting is scheduled for Tuesday at 1 pm. Before the meeting was sent out, Karen scheduled a separate meeting about the project schedule for Tuesday morning at Hopefully, the Karen meeting will flush out what we need to know. If it has a goal that is anything short of establishing and ?rming up a schedule with all parties committed to the desired shutdown duration, I believe her meeting will be a failure. I believe it would be best for George to make the decision on who else should be invited to the tony meeting. As you know, FMEO had no schedule input forthis project other than trying to be responsive to the HOG. And, we had no input into the decision to have Test and Balance as a separate contract. Considering the time duration for that activity, a suggestion may be to get asecond quote for that service. As far other attendees to themeeting. those in control of the schedule right now seem to be DEMO and Paul Probst, PE Asst. Din, Operations BFDr?Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office 404?639-0505 Cell: 404285-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 2:53 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Raymond, George (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: The Project OK George Chandler dropped by a few moments ago. He called the meeting to discuss the schedule. It was not Tony's idea. George's plan is have the schedule ?ushed out best as it can be, carry it to the stakeholders, and see reaction, and based on that, evaluate the options. one of which may be to pull the plug. George has apparently been actively involved in this over the last couple of days. Thanks, Paul 404-539-0505 From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday,, October 29, 2010 1:41 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: The Project In an interesting development, I IBM-WE 5:323": Ihas sent a Meeting Invitation to discuss the status of the Vivarium project schedule. i am assuming they are wanting a firm commitment of the required shutdown time, and anything longer than 6-8 weeks will be unacceptable. The invitee list includes: Paul Meechan, Bill Howard Nancy Cox, Michael Shaw, George Chandler, and myself. Of course, mar requests that invitations be extended to those who should be there in addition to his list. have not met Nancy Cox, but I have heard that she is not the kind of person who is going to accept'?we are working on it, and we'll get back to you? as an answer. This meeting is scheduled for Tuesday at 1 pm. Before the meeting was sent out, Karen scheduled a separate meeting about the project schedule for Tuesday morning at 7:30. Hopefully, the Karen meeting will ?ush outwhat we need to know. If it has a goal that is anything short of establishing and firming up a schedule with all parties committed to the desired shutdown duration, i believe her meeting will be a failure. I believe it would be best for George to make the decision on who else should be invited to the tony meeting. As you know, FMEO had no schedule input for this project other than trying to be responsive to the HOG. And, we had no input into the decision to have Test and Balance as a separate contract. Considering the time duration for that activity, a suggestion may be to get a second quote for that service. As far other attendees to the meeting, those in control of the schedule right now seem to be DEMO and Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir, Operations BFOlFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 4011-5390505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP). From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 1:42 PM {mag-321333 Raymond, George (CDGIEIBFO) ?g .. .. bf iva?um Occupancy Date FYI Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld ge . i Cox, Nancy Mes-Chan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Moss, Karen Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Banach, Tanya A. Bowen, Ken L. I Sent: Tue Nov 09 13:07:06 20 mil; BED .Con?rmation. of. ivarium Occupancy Date Friends: At the 2 NOV, meeting, I said that BFO would con?rm a occupancy target date-for the vivarium of 4 JAN 2011. Based on the ?nal scope of work and several meetings with the Contractor over the past few days, the revised occupancy target date for the vivarium is 10 JAN 2011. BFO will try andbeat that date as we work through the project if at all'possible. I hope that this revised target date is still acoeptable to Special Pathogens, and OSHE, Than ks for yourcontinued support-on this projectl Mathe, Chester (CDGIOCOOIOSEH From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 5:47 PM To: Moss. Karen Bo: Tyler, John Lingler, Arthur R. Daniels, Keith 4- (CTR Bowen Ken L. Howard, William (Bill) Raymond, George - Subiect: Window Slot Screens Karen: This is a follow up to our-conversation this afternoon regarding request of OSHE to have wire mesh screens installed at air-transfer slots of Animal Holding Room door windows (total 16) and Procedure Room Main Entry Door windows {total eight]. Should screening design be such that they can be installed separater from windows, and'if unable to have screening installed priorto Test and Balance late this month, please have Test and Balance performed withoutscreens. Should screens installed post result in air?ow restriction such that OHS deems Vivarium not acceptable for occupancy, FMEO and OSHE will jointly be responsible for modi?cations necessary to bring Vivarium into condition deemed OSHE acceptable. Respectfully, Paul Probst, PE- Asst. Dir., Operations BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 I E. I. it?- I shester From: I Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: 1. Tuesday, October 12, 2010 3:15 PM . o' Bowen, Ken L. Raymond. George (GDCIOCOOIBFO) @3131; .. .FW: 32339;? Schedule I 42 a 26m} ligaments: - cool?Ls?.cl.ns2a2a. .. 10-12 Schedule 20094.5.s-.cbc 20250? 1 I Since is out this week, I thought I should forward this to you. Art Message?Md From: L'ingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFOI Sent: Tuesday, October 12. 2010 1:00 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Schedule Please see the attached schedule for the current-schedule for the bldg.ir?flow project. An .pzoosass coc (blt?l 'From: Avery W. Wood IV Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:32 PM To: Mickle, Lenore Cc: Lingler, Arthur Fl. BFO lwillis@willismech.com; 'Grant Willis'; Mos; Karen i Schedule Lenore, See the attached revised schedule based on the revised work durations. As you can see, these durations are longer than we anticipated. Because the is not in WMI scope. WMI'has not planned to have a representative-on site during this time. While the change does .not add any cost to WMI, both the lab shut down and contract completion dates are show pushed out by the difference in work durations. We now show contract completion on 2/16f11. Also, please note the our schedule. assumes we will be releasing the equipment today Without approved submittals for our long lead equipment, the schedule will begin to-be impacted. Thanks, Avery W. Wood 3230 Peathtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 628 966 0094 Work 678 .966 9420 Fax Cell From: Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 12:05 PM W. Wood IV 252stth Avery, Please update your schedule to re?ect these dates for the Test and Balance portion of the contract. Art From: Moss, Karen Wednesday, October 05, 2010 4:21 PM 262ath To R. (cocrocoomrm Cc: Daniels, Subject: FW: P2009453 coc' Schedule Art, I talked with the TAB Contractor todaylhe has been out of the country and unavailable). He needs 30 working days to complete the field TAB work. Willis has TAB starting on Friday, December 3rd, 30 working days out from that has him ?nishing approximately on January 14th. He haslibll?l I. The report process will start on the January 17th and be delivered on the 24th of January. He agreed to do commissioning while the formal report process is ongoing. Which means TAB commissioning would start on the 1?th and the TAB report would be updated as work is done in the field; this is not a normal process. Normally the formal report process would not start until commissioning is complete. The earliest TAB would have reports delivered to the CDC for review would be on January 24th and would take a couple of days to review. We discussed the MLK holiday in January, i am not sure contractors can work on a government holiday or not but he said they could take the Monday off and work the Saturday before if need be. Please have Willis Mechanical update his schedule to reflect this information. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. M5 K-97 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-488-330? Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Avery W. Wood 1V Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:23 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: 'Grant Willis'; Moss, Karen Mickie, Lenore Schedule Art, ibii?l See attac 1u?pdated and revised schedule based on CDC comments at the meeting yesterday. This schedule is based on most . rrent lead times and durations of work. Please let me know ifanything needs to be changed. Thanks, Avery W. wood 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 623 966 0094 Work 573 966 9420 Fax Cell --?-0riginal Message-?? From: Mickie, Lenore [mailtozeem4@cdc.gov] Sent: Monday, October 011, 2010 12:0? PM To: Grant Willis; Tyler, John Moss, Karen Iwillis@willismech.com; Daniels, Charles E. Riley, Steve Lingler, Arthur R. Avery W. Wood JV Subject: P2009453 Sign-in 10,104! 10. RE: Today's Pre-construction Meeting, Roster Attached is a copy of the sign-in sheet, per your request. Thank you, Lenore Mickie CDC, Procurement and Grants Office Buildings and Facilities Contracts Branch Phone: 270-488-2623 Fax: 770-438-2811? LMickle@cdc.gov This e?mail and any files transmitted with it contain 0.5. Government information that is OFFICIAL USE or other types BUT UNCLASSIFIED information requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure. All information is confidential, intended solely for the addressee and shall be disseminated only on a TO basis. To provide feedback on your recent experiences with PEG, email Feedback will be used to improve business services. Message--?-- From: Koger Colgate 2316 (near) Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:00 PM To: Mickie, Lenore Subject: P2009453 Sign-in 10f04/10 Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using-an HP Digital Sending device. Willis Mechanical I Inca rpmamd 1 wm Dual Fmpus-al lam"? 5 Nana?a n; Pru?eaEI mum 'J?Www Mammal TUE-sumo; Wid'ms? 2' _d'hii-s' 5:55:15? inn-aid?? "Ilium" 'wIIdm-?sn Una-.- Wi'd'i?u Fro! Building Hnybal Campus . ml?mmhasw . Elk-u I11 I lug-11:1 In 1? 1s EF El?n? 'n'mamf 'I?Ir'?dTla'l?ga mnummf \IfaBTlr?u?m' 111:]? human; wed um Damn End-Lausl Duct-un?t N'me 9mm 'I?ilr 'Ii'dara: Hw ani?om Prim L1sI.la.llon 1' Lih'animmn Enid?? 15'" K-Ray :1 Nadealm Dampers i? ?37" W31 Iii?" 1 :?e?ni?uislun :2 uwhuical':mi" mg? DI?lnacra- days! Cant! DIE a I 13'? burials? :1 In 13 I msmleDnmauI-s New Fall: Shea?'e's' admin; $3553: 113$? 'nI?aim?thg Ma? I 922.11 I?thI'izIzno'I ma?a-a? ?days: ldarlrl' WeaIImmWE?m?l'??m? Tua'I Fi-i'i'zn [Jim' 'M??in?nl?FFI .. . . . .. . l'??dr?a'im?mm?? I Thu1lMIlM 1% Tue 'Il?rl?l um mama. as Measum I'd: Nina?GL1? 'cnc' 5d [Eli?r 11w] BE 6:15-35 #2 F15 F11 Tu: E?a'sm'r?sl 51 TEE Hem wani palm:th LisI." 51 55 lesh tie :a nut 5mm" 1day! L. a. 1 day nun?1:23? uni-?bif?l I _wid'EI?Ia?Ji??s'? 5'3 (antral: Gnm??lun Wed ?l?fl??We-didi I WE Iu.? . IrrL . lulu-l"! Tynan-d um I. Hum mm"! 5 ?lmm- In - I i in?: uni-id - -. - . :gmnr tuuium-nniemwm: . i I TII mung . Minn-l rum-:51 TB it Mm mumcul Mlqh'vqunm Paw 3mm Fill-32% ?mm ?mm-n . Wan-M km in. Mithe. Chester From: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 10:09 AM To: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 CDC - H- - -- -- chedule Attachments: 01010 Summary of Work_SOC_?Revised September 8. 2010.pdf Here is the latest Summary of Work. lhave not seen an air balance diagram for this project. I assume one is in the works. Art --?-Original From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 3:12 AM To: Lingler, Arthur R- Art: Thanks for sending schedule update._ Do you have a current scope? The last scope document we were provided was dated July 15, and I believe it may have been modified during negotiations. I have sent via separate e-mail. Also, is there an air balance diagram that the TAB contractor will be working from? Appreciate the help. Paul Message-nu From: Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:00 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: FW: P2009453 CDC ueira, William P. 1? Schedule Please see the attached schedule for the current schedule for the bldgairflow project. Art From: Avery W. Wood Sent: Thursday, October 2010 2:32 PM To: Mickle, Lenore (CDCIOCOOIPGO) (bli?i Lenore, See the attached revised schedule based on the revised work durations. As you can see, these durations are Iong'Ter than we anticipated. Because the is not in WMI scope, WMI has not planned to have a representative on site during this time. While the change does not add any cost to WMI, both the lab shut down and contract completion dates are show pushed out by the difference in work durations. We now show contract completion on 2/16/11. Also, please note the our schedule assumes we will be releasing the equipment today {10440}. Without approved submittals for our long lead equipment, the schedule will begin to be impacted. Thanks Avery W. Wood IV 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 6?8 966 0094 Work 678 966 9420 Fax Cell Message-?? From: Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Thursday, October 2010 12:05 PM To: Avery W. Wood IV 262a{ Avery, Please update your schedule to reflect these dates for the Test and Balance portion of the contract. Art From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:21 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIO Art, I talked with the TAB Contractor todaylhe has been out of the country and unavailable). He needs 30 working days to complete the field TAB work. Willis has TAB starting on Friday, December 3rd, 30 working days out from that has him finishing approximater on January 14th. He hasl?bj?cm The report process will start on the January 1?th and be delivered on the 24th ofJanuary. He agreed to do commissioning while the formal report process is ongoing. Which means TAB commissioning would start on the 17th and the TAB report would be updated as work is done in the ?eld; this is not a normal process. Normally the formal report process would not start until commissioning is complete. The earliest TAB would have reports delivered to the CDC for review would be on January 24th and would take a couple of days to review. We discussed the MLK holiday in January, lam not sure contractors can work on a government holiday or not but he said they could take the Monday off and work the Saturday before if need be. Please have Willis Mechanical update his schedule to reflect this information. .1 . . I Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. M5 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770438-830? Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: 770-488-266? email: KMossl@cdc.gov --?-Original From: Avery W. Wood IV Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:23 PM To: Lingler, Arthur H. Cc: ?Grant Willis'; Moss Karen Mickie, Lenore (COCJOCOOIPGO) Subject: P2009453 CDC moreusos *Schedule 252.301.- Art, See attached updated and revised schedule based on CDC comments at the meeting yesterday. This schedule is based on most current lead times and durations of work. Please let me know if anything needs to be changed. Thanks Avery W. Wood IV 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 673 966 0094 Work mg _Fax I - _Cel[ From: Mickle, Lenore Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:07 PM To: GrantWillis; Tyler, John Moss, Karen Iwillis@willismech.com; Daniels, Charles E. Riley, Steve Lingler, Arthur R. Avery W. Wood IV Subject: P2009453 Sign-in 10/034,310 RE: Today's Pre?construction Meeting, Roster Attached is a copy of the slgn~ln sheet, per your request. Thank you, Lenore Mickle CDC, Procurement and Grants Office Buildings and Facilities Contracts Branch Phone: 770433-2523 Fax: LMickle@cdc.gov This e-mail and any files transmitted with it contain US. Government information that is OFFICIAL USE or other types of SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED infermation requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure. All information is confidential, intended solely' for the addressee and shall be disseminated only on a TO basis. To provide feedback on your recent experiences with P60, email Feedback will be used to improve business services. "WOriginal From: Roger Colgate 2815 (near) Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:00 PM To: Mickie, Lenore Subject: 92009453 Sign-in Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device. [bl-I23 '42 US :2 2: 262cm. coo P2009453 - I Font I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEIUJ Section 010101 Summary of Work SECTION 01010 SUMMARY OF WORK FOR SOLUTION ORDER CONCEPT (SOC) PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. This section includes the following: Scope of Work. Work by the Government. Government Furnished Products. Contractor use of site and premises. Work Sequence. Government occupancy. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Related sections include the following: Section 01300 - Submitters Section - Network Anaiysfs Schedules Section 01546 - Heath and Safety Section 0f547- Personnef Security Requirements Section 01700 - Project Cfoseout 1.3 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD A. Project Delivery Method: The method ct delivery for this project is a Solution Order Concept (SOC). The SOC is characterized by the following elements: 1. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION The SOC is a process that does not utilize conventional design services, thereby empowering the Contractor to become very involved in the project's earliest stages. The Contractor, as a team member with CDC, will be expected to provide suggestions, ask questions, and offer potential alternative methods, systems, or products to the Scope ofWork (30W) provided by 000. The SOC process is based on CDC and the Contractor meeting at the site. reaching consensus on the scope. schedule, and cost of the project, confirming all agreements in writing, awarding the contract, and executing the work. Site Visit. The purpose of the site visit is to convey technical objectives for the project (SOW) to the Contractor and to be a working meeting that moves the team closer to the tinal definition of the project's scope. While all systems, materials. and issues may not be selected or settled during this site visit, all known issues should be revealed and discussed. a. Required Attendees: Contractor?s Project Manager and Superintendent; each major trade sub contractor's Project Manager; CDC Contracting Officer; CIMO (and/or DEMO) Project Managerts], design discipline experts, (30TH, and Building Manager: program representative(s); and appropriate support personnel from OHS, ITSCII OSEP. and similar programs. b. A follow up site meeting may be appropriate if additional information or clarification is required. PGO Request for Proposal. After the SOW has been refined, PGO will send the Solicitation, Offer, and Award document and attachments to the Contractor for pricing. Contractor's Proposal. The Contractor's proposal includes aschedule, scope, cost, and submittal materials as appropriate and required in the SOW to provide a solution to the requirements defined by the SOW and other components of the Solicitation. The tollowing are technical Revised September 5, 2010 (b}(3}242 262301} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 - Section 010102 Summary of Work requirements for its initial proposal to be submitted to the Contracting Officer (also refer to Section 01300): a. Demonstrate compliance with the SOW. b. Cost for the work and services broken down by building and detailed down to the trade by work activity. number of labor hours. and hourly costs. c. Equipment and material cut sheets, shop drawings. and product data. including MSDS sheets as appropriate. d. Provide alternatives fro consideration by CDC as appropriate. e. Construction schedule of activities. This would include necessary utility outages with duration estimates. B. Technical Evaluation. The technical evaluation by CDC will include. but may not be limited to. the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. lli'erification of compliance with the sow. Acceptance or rejection of Equipment and Materials submittals. Acceptance or rejection of required subm'rttals. shop drawings. samples, and all other information required by the sow. Evaluation of Construction Activity Schedule. Cost proposal. C. Award. The criteria for award are contained in the Solicitation. Offer, and Award document and attachments as issues by the Contracting Officer for this project. 1. Upon receipt of the contract. the Contractor shall execute any other non?site specific requirements of the contract. such as ordering items with long lead times. shop fabrication of aesemblies. initiation of shop drawings and other submittafs processes. update or partial short circuit and coordination study (if required). and all other activities to insure the project shall be completed according to the project scope. cost, and schedule. D. Notice to Proceed. The information In this paragraph in no way supersedes. negates. or defines the requirements contained in the Solicitation. Offer, and Award document issued by the Contracting Officer for this project. 1. Upon receipt of all requirements in the Solicitation, Offer. and Award document relating to award of Notice to Proceed (NTP). the Contracting Officer will. at the preconstruction meeting with the Contractor. issue the NTP with the following understanding that the Contractor shall do the following activities: a. Proceed with preparation of submittals. shop drawings. project schedute. and other similar requirements in the contract. b. Not be allowed on site until the requirements of Section 01547 Personnel Security have been ful?lled for the Contractor's Project Manager and Superintendent. 0. Provide the requirements of the Preliminary Outline Schedule in Section 01311 Network Anai?ysis Schedules at the preconstruction meeting. d. Commence personnel security process on remaining staff for project. e. Not be allowed to commence work on site until the Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan has been approved by the Contracting Officer. 1.4 DESCRIPTION OF WORK A. The Work of this project comprises certain repairs and improvements to the existing interior of Building EJocated at CDC's Fiovbal cam pus. These repairs and improvements include. but are not limited to. the following aspects as further defined and described in the Contract Documents: SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED Ftevlsed September a. 2010 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION coo P2009453 - Section 010103 gage}? Uri Hivao MODIFICATIONS Foe .. - I Summary of Work Mechanical 1_ Tap into the existing 72 14 supply ductwork in interstitial space and route new duotwork to new pneumatic phoenix supply valve. Route two 11" round ducts to two new phoenix valves and one 10" round duct to relocated existing phoenix valve. Route to new heating coils. 2. Contractor to field verify fit and routing of new ductwork with existing conc?tions. Route all main ductwork as high as possible. 3. Transition from new phoenix valves outlet to 14x12 heating coils. See appendix for attached heating coil selection. 4. Core slab penetrations as shown on floor slab in interstitial space and per architectural and structural requirements. Stab penetration locations to be determined by nondestructive testing. I 5. Nondestructive testing to be done on the first day of the lab shut down to verify that no conduit is in the stab at proposed openings. Nondestructive testing to be done under separate CDC contract. 6. Route new 12 12 ductwork from the new phoenix valve through new slab penetrations to new supply air diffusers in the corridor. Provide out of floor fire damper Ruskin Model DIDB20 (Type BC) in interstitial before slab penetration. Install per manufacturer and SMACNA ?re damper out of installation instructions. Diffusers shall be 12 12; Titus model number (BOOBS-SS. Provide gas tight bubble damper at each diffuser. I3. Re-route fire sprinkler pipe it required. CDC to provide "As-Built? of sprinkler pipe in the 56' 11. Tap into existing hot water supply and return pipes and route new 1" pipes to new reheat coils. Provide new hot water two way control valves to match existing control valves at existing heating coils. 4mm 12. Provide all associated controls and devices to make a complete supply system. 13. Insulate supply ductwork and hot water pipe. All devices, materials and equipment to match existing unless specified otherwise. 14. Provide missing opposed btade balancing dampers on existing ductwork as identified by baseline Test and Balance Report. a 15. Provide new water proof temperature sensor in new wall of Do control new 5r a a 16. Provide paintable to seal diffusers in corridor. i Lib ii. Homoseexisti ng..exhaust.grille in elevator lobby to pressurize space and patch per architectural requirements. Demolish existing ductwork and phoenix valve back to main trunk. Fie-use existing 8? round phoenix valve. I) 18. Replace two counterbalanced isolation dampers atI - Counterbalance ?;fu 3 to be sized and selected by fan manufacturer. Contractor to field verify dimensions before ordering dampers' tbli31'42 g: to. Replace tvvo low leakage motorized bypass dampers atI I "Bypass dampers to negate. besized and selected by fan manufacturer. Contractor to field verify dimensions before ordering. 20. Provide motor sheaves for fans if required by Test and Balance after construction and during commissioning. 21. Tap into existing exposed elbow and add new stainless steel thermal double wall 12 to supply ductwork in shower anteroom, route to new 12 12 diffuser: Titus Model number BOOBS-SS with opposed blade balancing damper. Contractor to field verity existing conditions for location and fit of ductwork and diffuser. 22. Test and Balance of exhaust and sopply systems in the Vivarium to be done under separate contract. 23. Near the end of construction Test and Balance will perform preliminary fan testingl?troubleshooting. I 24. ?ssing insulation on ductwork and pipe for all pipe and ductwork related to AHU- Identify location of a plugs for future. 25. Seal air leakage at existing six fire dampers located in the interstitial that serves the clean corridors. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (sou; Revised September a. son: SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 - Section 010104 3352:? I Summary of Work 26. Contractor to provide drawings. 27. Provide shop drawings. and submittals via hard copy and electronically. 28. Contractor shall provide detailed sheet metal and pipe shop drawings for CDC approval. 29. Glass slot size shall be verified with CDC before ordering glass. 30. Replace filters in animal holding rooms. 31. Plug two drains in existing tan plenum box. 32. At Ian plenum box provide gasketed 12 12 access door with door handle that locks. Door is to provide visual and physical access to backdratt dampers. Access door to be located adjacent to existing two position damper. with existing replaced control damper to control duct static pressure. Existing Control Sequence shall remain with modifications as follows: 1. During tan operation. BAS system shall modulate both control dampers located at the roof exhaust plenum in unison to maintain exhaust static pressure setpoint. initial setpoint shall be TAB Company to determine final sensoint. 2. On a tan failure as sensed by one of the two current switches. an alarm shall be sent. Exhaust plenum control dampers shall continue to modulate maintaining exhaust duct static pressure setpoint. 3 On failure of both fans as sensed by either current switches an alarm shall be generated and the associated AHU supply fan shall stop. 4. Upon drop in exhaust duct static 2.0 (adj) below setpoint. a warning alarm shall be generated. This warning alarm point is the point where the Phoenix exhaust vavles begin to lose control of air?ow. 5 . 6 On a drop in exhaust duct static ressure below 1.5" (adj) assc lbw?? ?53' (associated with exhaust fans ibii3ir42 USE. 2523??) the scheduled airflow as measured by the airflow station an alarm shall be generated. The TAB contractor will detennine the actual . rflow percentage that repr and that shall stop. Exhaust fans plenum control dampers shall modulate to maintain a 1.0" (adj) exhaust duct static. II a duct static cannot be maintained that allows for a sale egress lrom the area. BAS system shall stop dampers will modulate to maintain static setpoint. Safe egress exhaust duct static pressure will determined by the TAB contractor. Fleset of the systems shall be manually initiated. Existing Control Sequence shall remain with modifications as follows: 1. Upon supply tan tailors the the exhaust fan control damper shall modulate to maintain a 1.0" (adj) exhaust duct static . This setpoint to be set by the TAB contractor to maintain negative air Ilow and safe egress. 252ach Architectural MSW 1. Remove door U331 and fill opening with concrete masonry. Finish wall with epoxy paint. 2. Provide new In?ow In I ew infill well. 3. Provide new concrete masonry wall in Corridor Install new automatic opening swing door in new masonry wall. install metal wall guards at masonry wall. Finish wall with epoxy paint. use. a SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Revised September a. 2010 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) lb: 3m CDC P2009453 - Section 010105 eaten:? HVAC NS-FORI -- - I Summary of Work 4. Remove existing directional air llow ?ping-pong? indicator devices from approximately 33 doors. Install manufacturer supplied caps to resulting penetrations in walls. Provide new rubber door sweepsfbottoms to approximately 12 doors. 5. Remove existing vision glass from approximately 30 doors. Replace with newglass sized to leave air gaps in doors. 6. Provide new full gasket sets to three sets of doors. Resulting door assemblies to seal to gas-tight condition when closed. Paint the ceiling bays at each new slab penetration in Corrido withsepcxy. WORK BY THE GOVERNMENT A. The Government has a direct contract with the test and balance firm. CDC will also decontaminate the area prior to commencement of work in the animal area and after completion of work. No other work by CDC is anticipated for this Project. 1.5 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PRODUCTS A. No products or materials will be-lurnished by the Government for this Project. 1.8 CONTRACTOR USE OF SITE AND PREMISES A. B. D. Limit use of site and premises to allow: 1. Regular and continued use of. and access to. Immediate area around Buildings 15. 16. 1B. 21. and 23. adjacent walkways and CDC parking area. Construction Operations: Limit construction operations to the areas noted on drawings. Government security at CDC facilities requires that the Contractor and all agents remain in the area designated by the limit of work in the Contract Documents. Failure to observe this requirement is grounds tor dismissal ofthe offending party. Repeated violations may be grounds fordismissal of the Contractor. or agent at fault. or both. 1. Contractors on exterior projects shall not be allowed access to the interior of any CDC building. except to perform work scheduled in an interior space. Time Restrictions for Performing Work: All Work which cannot be performed during normal duty hours shall require the Contractor to submit a schedule of anticipated Work to the Contracting Officer prior to execution of the Work. This includes utility outages, work on Federal holidays. and other activities. Known activities include the following: 1 . Utility Outages and Shutdown: The Contractor shall arrange with the Contracting Oflicer. Utility outages and associated work shalI be scheduled from 6:00 pm to 6:00 am. Monday through Thursday. or 6:00 pm. Friday. to 6:00 am. Monday. The Contractor shall request such outages a minimum of 10 days prior to shutdown. There shall be no exceptions to the 10 day minimum requirement. 2. Work on Weekends. Federal holidays and other requests: The Contractor shall arrange with the Contracting Of?cer. The Contractor shall provide such request a minimum of 5 days prior to scheduled Work. Site Conditions: The Contractor, shall upon completion of the Work. repair. alter, remove. replace exterior materials to conform to each material's condition prior to commencement of work. our UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (sec) Revised September El. 2010 tittii?ii?? 'EilS-t?- SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 - Section 010106 MW I Summary of work 262301] E. Project Cleanup and Closeout. An amount equal to 10% of the contract amount. including all modifications. will be held by the Contracting Officer until all project cleanup and closeout requirements have been performed by the Contractor and acceptable to the Contracting Officer. 1. Project cleanUp and closeout issues that the Contractor shall be responsible for include, but are not limited to, the following: a) Removal of all debris. excess materials. and equipment brought on site by the Contractor or any agent of the Contractor. b) Removal. replacement. or refurbishment as required of all Government utilities used during execution of the work. c) Submission and resubmission if required. of all closeout documents required by this project. These include resolution of final inspection listing. operating and maintenance manuals. staff training. warranty information. askbuilt documents. and others as listed in the relevant specification sections. 2. Prior to Final Acceptance. the Contractor shall request a review of these issues by the Contracting Officer. Upon successful completion of the review. and when all defective issues have been resolved to the satisfaction of the Contracting Officer. the affected funds will be released. Limit use of site and premises to allow: 1. Government occupancy of the building. 2. Use of site and adjacent spaces by the Government and the public tor normal daily operations and functions. 1.7 GOVERNMENT OCCUPANCY A. People employeesivisitors) in Building 18 will occupy its premises. including but not limited to the project area. during the entire period of construction. Contractor is to keep in consideration the access and egress needs of these occupants. B. Cooperate with the Government. represented by the Contracting Officer. to minimize conflict. and to facilitate the daily operations of Building 13 as well as other buildings and facilities on the Fioybal Campus. C. Schedule the Work to accommodate this requirement. 1.8 DOCUMENT SECURITY A. Document security is important to the Government. The documents providedto you in any format are sensitive and you must take provisions to protect the confidentiality of the information. The requirements below are intended to supplement current documents security policy. By acceptance of any printed or electronic documents. you agree to the following: 1. The documents shall not be transmitted to a third party without written permission of the Contracting Officer. Ftefer to Part 2 of this specification section for the Document Tracking Log. 2. All documents shall be returned at the conclusion of the project. No documents shall be kept for any purpose by you. your firm. or any of your subcontractors. suppliers. or agents. Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. 3. All electronic files shall be deleted from storage devices (computers. zip drives. hand held devices. and such). Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. 4. All and magnetic disk shall be returned to the Contracting Officer. Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. SENSITIVE our UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION {sew Flevrsad September a. 201 ij 3..42 {3 262mb" SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 -- Section 010107 HVAC MG FOHI .. . I Summary. of work 5. All devices that contain electronic information shall be protected by password. 5. All printed documents shall be stored in a secure area until returned to the Contracting Officer. 7. Ftetum of all required documents and media shall be part ofthe project's completion and closeout requirements, and shall be satisfactorily completed prior to approval of final invoice. 1.9 GOVERNMENT USE OF THE SITE A. lnterigr: The following is a brief description of Government use of the site that may have varying effects on the execution of the Work required under this contract. 1. The requirements and demands for Government operations. schedules, and programs in Building 18 will continue to occur throughout the construction period. Response to these requirements and demands will be met by the Government in spaces adjacent to the project area. Therefore. it is very critical that construction activities for this project, including workers. equipment. and materials, have minimal potential for disruption to Government activities in the spaces adjacent to the project location. Notify and coordinate with project officer when interior occupants could be affected by exterior work activities. B. Exterior: The following is a brief description of Government use of the site that may have varying effects on the execution of the Work required under this contract. 1. The operation and function of the adjacent buildings and spaces will continue during the construction period of this project. Pedestrians. vehicles. equipment. and goods will continue to be present in adjacent exterior spaces to the construction site. 2. A schedule of Contractor vehicular movement of dumpsters. deliveries. and other similar issues shall be provided to the Contracting Officer for approval to maintain safety and minimize disruptions and conflicts to all parties. Activities concerning placement of dumpsters and storage at removal of hazardous materials. will only be executed after guidance from the Project Officer. 3. The Contractor shall provide a delivery schedule of all equipment and materials to the Contracting Officer at least 10 calendar days prior to the earliest scheduled delivery that requires the Use of the loading dock. The Contracting Officer will coordinate Government use of the loading dock with Cootractor requests and accommodate such requests to the greatest extent possible. 1.10 CONTRACTOR ACTIONS UPON NOTICE OF CONTRACT AWARD A. The information in this paragraph in no way supercedes. negates. or defines the requirements contained in the Contract. Unless otherwise specifically addressed with different requirements in the Contract terms and conditions. the Contractor shall immediately initiate the following actions upon receipt of the Notice of Award: 1. Fulfill requirements of Section 0154? Personnel Security Requirements for the Contractor=s Superintendent and Project Manager. The Contractor will not be allowed on site until these requirements are met. The Government will not be responsible nor liable for any delays to the Work for the Contractor's inability or failure to obtain timely clearances or sufficient numbers of cleared personnel. 2. Prepare and submit to the Contracting Officer the required Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan. The Contractor will not be allowed to commence Work on site until the Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan has been approved by the Contracting Officer. Any delays caused bythe Contractor's failure to obtain an approved Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan shall be attributed to the Contractor and shall not be considered an eitcusable delay. 3. Take action and complete all effort necessary to produce and present the Preliminary Outline SENSITIVE EIUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Revised September?. 201D SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 - Section 010108 -- I Summary of Work Schedule in 0131 NeMork Scheduies at the preconstruction meeting. The Contractor shall be considered delinquent in pertormance if these documents are not ready for presentation at the preconstruction meeting. 4. Commence personnet security process on project's workers. 5. Proceed with preparation of submittals. shop drawings, and other similar requirements of the contract. 6. Anticipate receiving formal Notice to Proceed from the Contracting Officer within 23 caiendar days after Notice oi Award. It is customary. but not required for the Contracting Of?cer to issue Notice to Proceed at the preconstruction meeting. PART 2 PRODUCTS A. Document Tracking Log. Attachment is the form to be used upon approval by the Contracting Officer of request to provide documents to a third party. P3 . TEMPLATE - acument Tracking L, PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Revtsad September B. 2010 ?ame, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday. October 26, 2010 9:03 AM To: Chandler, Geore Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCODIBFD) 38:3,: Bowe L. Probst, Paul E. ?2 gmect: PW: ivarium Schedule We got this letter from thebranch yesterday. They;r are complaining about the schedule however if we compress the we should be OK. Thought you might want to see this. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404?639-3303 Office 404-639-0499 Fax From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:22 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFCU _Cc: Rayl- George (CDCIOCOOJBFO) mg}: -: Vivarium Schedule Schedule Letter.de= Ken: Attached is a letter from regarding the Vivarium schedule. It is dated last week, but was forwarded to me from OSHE yesterday. The letter requests that the shutdown duration be 5-8 weeks, which returns the space back to Programs mid to late December. have attached the schedule, which shows a ?Finish Construction? date of Friday, January 28, which will then make the space available for move-in on Monday, January 31. This is thirteen weeks duration. The Test and Balance component itself is a six week duration, and I have no exclamation for that. Also, the letter from incorrectly interprets the schedule as a completion date of February 16; hoWever, the last 2 1/5 weeks are preparation of Close?out documents. And. I am not sure how they interpreted the overall duration as 2 ?15 months. Using the Noel Feb. 16 window, the duration would be 3 ?er months. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir., Operations BFOiFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Office 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2550 42 252all'lj- KI Willis Hv?bqumcatlonslib? 31-352 U5 October 7. 21:10 Mechanical Pr Incorporated Bulldin Harlan] Campus Emil-pm: my ?T??fli!?Wmmn I r; i?m?fmFM-?FHJS?g-?Th?c??m?m??M El '3 Sunni: Edda?pf? 5 3; Ian-uni:lemuf?eini? 2' '1 wan-me- 'mh??r?'smnal' wEu'Iimnl?srsi'zm?fu? .5 QM, I I '2 Iu'dzn ?mimin? WeaTzi?a-ini" 3 5 3 I '?'mwi Wad i 2- I munPhaanhu'u'am mil-u. I IE I 1-day: maun'??i" "h BMTHEWT I 5. I '11" I I i 2 mm- minim?:6? mag?15mm I If aim mi'inmnil' . 'r Ii $313.5:? ismI Muir-Mimi m1a?2mur 1 - z? i I "ninm' n'?wrinI waTu?W? ?nial?rime Win?? ?Tr?nEma-mm ind-n1 Thu 41:. Wed madam TIIuTnuaI?c?i?i?uii" m" 5 I 5? Omega-51W" d? - lda-y Tun Harm Tue magnum-M I may. umhfzu'u: m- . I- WMIDLHW I .nap_ wu?nwm nan unma'n I I ll- mm Wm "moan-5572aPin'm mum lulu-army? Tn Hammaqmm - 5 . . a mur' ?f "Sm?Fmme Wi?a?mz?r I I . I i weir-LEM uumammal. nan i l; vn'fmnam- Tull 11mm n-nmm Shut ink?I'? ""mri? {inf mm 1.1955:35. was mm 11311310 153,21 I. . 7 '54" sur?ng?n" szmn' an" I i may: . Frlimvm? "?nd 11mm 3-way. '3 3 '3 militia-Hm i333?" TE'im'a'niI" Tau?112E? Mm The ?raw: i w?di?j'l'? 3r 'r 1?63,; 30"" I mummama-rcme 2m. Wod 11mm mumw an i - - i 71? magnum f. I j. 5 3? tin-u Iw?t?f?hdrm 11mm: Tl?? I v- -?M_T?dm_buv? ?zis?fui?'?im' a 3 hu- i ?111am: Tun mm mm 11mm: 45 minim-dynam- I I Iday"Tr" 11mm wed warm Hana" 'Fm'mr?'??riif summ- mz'wm mmun 35.33.4522 1 I i 3- '7an . - 1n rampart am: ?on Him WVMH sFall mun Iay?. F91 1mm Hum" It I 7? ons?'h?" ?m?"jf ?uTI?Fa'T?wsim?w'nau? 'Fii?aimam" ?aw? ?f?ram??s'z - i 1 1 3' "53' bm?'?n?m ii'm "Mm-175.511" "Wan arm: 55 i av mm amen?. um mm?mwmSpit ?Hun-u ammo Mm mm? cm Tall MINE-N- Inn-In Mm Ian-Inna: ma m1 AK . We-spp?reciate that the work scheduled-for the vive'rium is important and extensive, but a 2.5 months is unacceptable greatty impede ?r shim" '9 ful?lt many I MELWSC Dthhe respt?nsibili?eis taske'd l0 our Divi?ion?. The retent?sh utdoWn of our spammin- Bu?ilding 15?was prolonged-fer s?i'sdditianal 3-4 weeks and We'have not yet=fully=sc dressed the that-shutdown. We request that you recen'sider the schedule-and keep the 's?uldownip?riod to the b?gtnally suggested 6-8 weeks. ?2 ai? (DEB): ?2 Mathe, Chester Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Tuesday. October 26, 2010 5:55 PM Bowen, Ken Raymond, George From: Sent - OOIBFO) .Ew; Building. ivarium Shutdown Schedule FYI Sent from mv BlackBerrv Wireless Handheld Original Message From: To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFCI), Cc: Howard, William [Bill] Sent: Tue Oct 26 10: 4? [btr3::42 SC. ?252alh- Raymond, George {cocfocoofaso} 5 2010 Eat: HE: Elm-ding ivarium Shutdown Schedule Thanks Paul. Obviously the 2.5 months is a type. I believe they were reading the schedule using the February 16th date as you have indicated below. However, the end of the letter does clearly indicate would still like to go with the original schedule of 8 weeks which would allow them to get in sometime the first week oflanuary and not the 13 week schedule for the end of January. Thanks El From: Probst, Paul E. 1 Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:51 AM To: Raymond, George Howard, William [Bill] jtr?ivarium Shutdown Schedule ?2523Utj CC: I LLSE. 969mm Although it does not satisfy the 6-8 week suggestion, let me offer the following clarification to the schedule. The letter from incorrectlv interprets the schedule as a completion date of February 16. While that is the overall construction completion date, the last 21/: weeks are preparation of Close-out documents, and the facility will be readv for move-in on January 29. Also, i am not sure how they interpreted the overall duration as 23/5 months. Using the Nov. 1 Feb. 16 window, the duration would be 3 3/1 months. With January 29th as the move-in date, the overall duration now stands at 13 weeks. Thanks, Paul 4011-6390505 (blt3li42tltfi612t: FW: Building ~~--0riginal Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:24 AM ivarium Shutdown Schedule 252mm To: Raymond, George Probst, Paul E. us i (maxim 262a(h) m-?Original Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:08 PM schedule. May be a little too late. To: Zambuto, Laura ma Wicocxocooxosaei iuarium Shutdown Schedule Fyi. From: Adgie, Andrea L. Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:31 PM To: Tanya A. Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Katz, Jackie liyarium Shutdown Schedule AttachEd is a signed letter from thivision addressing the Building original will be sent by interof?ce mail. Thankyou, Andy Andrea Adgie, MBA Management and Program Analyst Carter Consulting, Inc. Immunolo and Pathogenesis Branch U.S.C. 262301) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30333 Tel: 404?639-0795 Fax: 405-639-2350 (mists; use. wanum shutdown schedule. The ?2?2athi Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Daniels. Charles E. Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 8:21 AM To: Cox. Nancy (CDCIOIDJNCIRD) Cc: Chandler, George Maxwell. James C. BtivirenI Ken L. Bertech, Tanya A. Daniels, Charles E. was (CDCIOCOOFBFO) . .. . - . zeiaw- anal-eat: Buildi?ngD-IVAC Modi?cations to i Dr. Cox and Colleaguesappreciate you voicing your concerns related to the Building vivarium project. Various of?ces within BFO ands 252mm PGO have spent considerable time, effort, and funding toward accomplishing the revisions to the vivarium spaces OSHE has requested. Several offices within BFCI have been associated with the project. Paul Probst, with FMED, is the BFO point of contact in the HOG meetings and other situations. Our of?ce, DEMO, is responsible for the design of the project, incorporating the requirements of the requesting group (OSHE), defining the scope of work, and estimating the cost of the project. Once the project was awarded, the leadership of the project moved from DEMO to CIMO, with Art Lingler as the Construction Manager. The Contractor provides the cost and schedule when submitting the cost proposal for the project. We utilized the Solution Order Concept to reduce the length oftime in the design portion ofthe project. This procurement method has the advantage of involving the Contractor through the design process, providing coordination and feedback between BFO and the Contractor. The current Contractor's schedule re?ects work being completed in the vivarium on January 27, 2011. We believe the February 16, 2011 date you referenced was mistakenly taken as the end of the shut down. Actually, it is the Contract Completion date. We are all working to reduce the vivarium?s down time as mach as possible and the Contractor's approved schedule may be shortened, based on actual time frames. What we do not want to do is to provide an artificiaily short time frame for construction, and then have to tell you the facility will not be ready on time, as it seemed to happen in the Building 15 example your provided. The Contractor's schedule is being reviewed by Art Lingler and our staff, as well as the Contractor?s staff. The Contractor will revise the schedule to re?ect actual work activity times. Hopefully, we will be able to turn the vivarium back to you and your colleagues earlier than the scheduled date ofJanuary Paul Probst has the responsibility to update during HOG meetings and is able to ask to be briefed by Art Lingler on the project's progress. We have tried to provide the staff at CDC the most realistic schedule for this project without compromising the objectives ofthe project or the realities ofthe manufacturing and construction process. Thank you Mathe, Chester From: Belflower. Craig (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday. November 01, 2010 1:45 PM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ . . ?Cc: Frohst, Paul I 'Wal ole: Kenneth K. let?Pct. . .. qe uence Review -- I have reviewed the programming for both systems and made changes to sequences to re?ect the current state of the controls. the-l FM E0 recommends that the current seqLIence of operation in place should not be modi?ed. Craig Bel?ower I . I 2525(h] Sequencedocx Sequencedocg 42 EEZSIRI Ct; 2625th Li 262m} I Seguence of Opera-1LT; START-STOP: EXHAUST FANS: ARE ASSOCIATED WITH AIR HANDLING UNIT: AND ONCE INDEXED ON. THE FANS OPERATE CONTINUOUSLY 24 HOURS A DAY. FANS WILL SHARE A COMMON BYPASS DAMPE RS. ON SYSTEM START-UP OF THE AHU AND THE EXHAUST FANS. WILL BE COMMANDED TO START. I A I C- OR MAINTENANCELOCKOUT. SHALL START. THE TWO POSITION HEADER DAMPER AND OUTSIDE AIR BYPA COMMANDED BE COMMANDED TO START WEI-IA STEERING EKHALISI EAN PROVE STATUS VIA CURRENT TRANSFORMER RELAY. UPON PROOF OF STATUS 2 3 252th; ONSI .42 262mm SECOND EXHAUST FAN SHALL BE COMMANDED TO START AND THE OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPER WILL BE RELEASED TO FROM OPEN TO MAINTAIN STATIC PRESSURE AT SETPDINT.UPON PROOF OF STATUSIF ONE FANCIE U-S-G- HAS FAILED TO START OR IS IN MAINTENANCE LOCKOUT, THE TWO-POSITION HEADER DAMPER SHALL BE COMMANDED TD COMMON DAMP ERS ARE LOCATED ON THE EXHAUST AIR PLENUM BOX. THE DAMPER AND ACTUATOR WILL BE PROVIDED WITH THE FAN UNIT. STATIC PRESSURE AND PLENUM DAMPER CONTROL: A STATIC PRESSURE SENSOR LOCATED IN THE FAN PLENUM WILL SENSE THE STATIC PRESSURE IN THE FAN PLENUM. THE SENSOR WILL BE PROVIDED WITH THE UNIT AND THE SIGNAL WILL BE TRANSMITTED TO THE BAS. WHEN BOTH FANS ARE RUNNING THE BAS WILL MEASURE THE FAN PLENUM STATIC PRESSURE. OPEN THE TWO POSITION DAMPER AND WILL IN TURN MODULATE THE OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPER TO MAINTAIN THE ZONE EXHAUST AT THE REQUIRED STATIC PRESSURE LEVEL. WHEN ONE FAN FAILS OR IS TURNED OFF BY MAINTENANCE LOCKOUT. THE BAS WILL MEASURE THE FAN PLENUM STATIC PRESSURE. CLOSE THE TWO POSITION DAMPER AND WILL CONTINUE TO MODULATE THE OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPER TO MAINTAIN THE ZONE EXHAUST AT THE REQUIRED STATIC PRESSURE LEVEL. THE ENHAUST STATIC PRESSURE CONTROL ACTION WILL INCORPORATE A PROPO RTIONAL. INTEGRAL DERIVATIVE CLOSED LOOP CONTROL ALGORITHM U5 .3. 26mm. PON A SMOKE CONDITION IN THE SUPPLY DUCT. MO - BYFEIELE ALARM SYSTEM. WILL GO -- IWILL BE COMMANDED TO STOP. IN THE EVENT THA FAILED OR IS IN MAINTENANCE LOCKOUT. TO RUN. THE TWO-POSITION BYPASS DAMPER AND OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPERS SHALL BE COMMANDED TO 100 OPEN. THIS CONDITION WILL ALSO APPLY TO A DUAL FAN FAILURE FOR 8.6. HANDIEMERGENCY STARTISTOP CONTROL ON LOSS OF POWER TO THE DDC CONTROL PANEL. THE OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPER WILL OPEN TO A SET POSITION AS CONTROLLED BYTHE PRESSURE SETTING OF A PRU THAT IS PIPED IN PARALLEL HE AUTOMATIC EPT. SETTING SHA 4 I, PREDETERMINED TO SIMULATE DAMPER CONTROL DURING NORMAL OPERATION BE-COMMANDED TO RUN. CLOSED AUTO CONTACT ON H-O-A SAFTIES and ALARMS: IF THE H-O-A SWITCH IS OUT OF THE AUTO-POSITION FOR MORE THAN 10 MINUTES (ADJJ. AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED TO THE BAS. UPON AN EXHAUST FAN FAILURE. AS SENSED BY A CURRENT SWITCH. THE EXHAUST FAN WILL BE LOOKED OUT AND AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED TO THE BAS. BUILDING OPERATOR MUST INITIATE A SOFTWARE RESET OF THE EXHAUST FAN ALARM TO RETURN THE EXHAUST FAN TO SERVICE. IF THE PLENUM EXHAUST AIR STATIC PRESSURE RISES ABOVE OR DROPS BELOW SETPOINT FOR AN ADJUSTABLE AMOUNT OF TIME. AN ALARM WILL GENERATED TO THE BAS. OVERRIDE PANEL CONTROL: THE OVERRIDE PANEL WILL HAVE AN H-O-A SWITCH FOR THE EXHAUST FAN TO BE OVERRIDEN ON OR OFF- OVERRIDE OFF CONTROL BOTH EXHAUST FANS WILL SHUT DOWN AND THE TWO-POSITION AND OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPER WILL CLOSE. DURING OVERRIDE OFF CONTROL. THE CONTROL POWER TO THE LOCAL FAN H-O-A SWITCH IS BUILDING OPERATOR WILL NOT BE ABLE TO START THE EXHAUST FANS IN THE HAND OR AUTO MODE. OVERRIDE ON CONTROL BOTH EXHAUST FANS SHALL BE COMMANDED TO RUN. THE CONTROL POWER TO THE LOCAL FAN SWITCH IS BYPASSED AND SENT STRAIGHT TO THE STARTER CONTACTOR. BUILDING OPERATOR WILL NOT BE ABLE TO STOP THE EXHAUST FANS IN THE HANDI OFF OR AUTO MODE. THE DAMPER OPERATION IS DEPENDENT UPON THE NUMBER EXHAUST FANS REPORTING STATUS. IF ONLY ON EXHAUST FAN IS RUNNING. THE TWO-POSITION DAMPER WILL CLOSE AND THE OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPERWILL OPEN 100%. IF BOTH EXHAUST FANS ARE REPORTING STATUS. THE AND OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPER WILL BE COMMANDED OPEN 100%. Inn-:42 -: . 252mm Sequence of Operation START-STOP: EXHAUST FANS A ARE ASSOCIATED WITH AIR HANDLING UNIT 2 AND ONCE INDEXED ON. THE FANS OPERATE CONTINUOUSLY 24 HOURS A DAY. THE FANS WILL SHARE A COMMON - SITION HEADER DAMPER AND OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPERS. ON SYSTEM START-UP OF THE AHU AND THE EXHAUST FANEI "c 13 WILL BE COMMANDED TO START. IAILS TO START OR IS IN MAINTENANCE LOCKOUHALL STAF POSITION HEADER DAMPER AND OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPERS WILL BE COMMANDED TO 100% OPEN BE COMMANDED TO START WHEN AT LEAST ONE OF THE TWO EXHAUST FANS PROVE STATUS VIA CURRENT TRANSFORMER RELAY. UPON PROOF OSTATUS. THE SECOND EXHAUST FAN SHALL BE COMMANDED TO START AND THE OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPER WILL BE RELEASED TO MODULATE FROM 100% OPEN TO MAINTAIN STATIC PRESSURE AT SETPOINT.UPON PROOF OTATUS. IF ONE OR BOTH EXHAUST FANS HAS FAILED TO START OR IS IN MAINTENANCE LOCKOUT. THE TWO-POSITION HEADER DAMPER SHALL SE COMMANDED TO CLOSE. THE COMMON DAMPERS ARE LOCATED ON THE EXHAUST AIR PLENUM BOX. THE DAMPER AND ACTUATOR WILL BE PROVIDED WITH THE FAN UNIT. STATIC PRESSURE AND PLENUM DAMPER CONTROL: A STATIC PRESSURE SENSOR LOCATED IN THE FAN PLENUM WILL SENSE THE STATIC PRESSURE IN THE FAN PLENUM. THE SENSOR WILL BE PROVIDED WITH THE UNIT AND THE SIGNAL WILL BE TRANSMITTED TO THE BAS. WHEN BOTH FANS ARE. RUNNING THE BAS WILL MEASURE THE FAN PLENUM STATIC PRESSURE. OPEN THE TWO POSITION DAMPER AND WILL IN TURN MODULATE THE OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPER TO MAINTAIN THE ZONE EXHAUST AT THE REOUIRED STATIC PRESSURE LEVEL. WHEN ONE FAN FAILS OR IS TURNED OFF BY MAINTENANCE LOCKOUT. THE BAS WILL MEASURE THE FAN PLENUM STATIC PRESSURE. CLOSE THE TWO POSITION DAMPER AND WILL CONTINUE TO MODULATE THE OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPER THE ZONE EXHAUST AT THE REQUIRED STATIC PRESSURE LEVEL. THE EXHAUST STATIC PRESSURE CONTROL ACTION WILL INCORPORATE A PROPORTIONAL. INTEGRAL DERIVATIVE IPIDJ CLOSED LOOP CONTROL ALGORITHM SMOKE CONTROL: UPON A SMOKE CONDITION IN THE SUPPLY DUCT. MONITORED BY FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. THE BAS WILL CO 't I THE AHU OFF. WILL BE COMMANDED TO STOP. IN THE EVENT THAT HAS FAILED OR IS IN MAINTENANCE LOCKOUT. A WILL CONTINUE TO RUN. THE TWO-POSITION BYPASS DAMPER AND OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPERS SHALL BE COMMANDED TO 100 $3 OPEN. THIS CONDITION WILL ALSO APPLY TO A DUAL FAN FAILURE FOR HANDIEMERGENCY STARTISTOP CONTROL ON LOSS OF POWER TO THE DOG CONTROL PANEL. THE OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPER WILL OPEN TO A SET POSITION AS CONTROLLED BY THE PRESSURE SETTING OF A PRV THAT IS PIPED IN PARALLEL WITH THE AUTOMATIC EPT. PRV SETTING SHALL BE PREDETERMINED TO SIMULATE DAMPER CONTROL DURING NORMAL OPERATION SHALL BE COMMANDED TO RUN VIA NORMALLY CLOSED AUTO CONTACT ON H-O-A SWITCH. SAFTIES and IF THE H-O-A SWITCH IS OUT OF THE AUTO POSITION FOR MORE THAN 10 MINUTES (ADJJ. AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED TO THE BAS. UPON AN EXHAUST FAN FAILURE. AS SENSED BY A CURRENT SWITCH. THE EXHAUST FAN WILL BE LOCKED OUT AND AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED TO THE BAS. BUILDING OPERATOR MUST INITIATE A RESET OF THE EXHAUST FAN ALARM TO RETURN THE EXHAUST FAN TO SERVICE. IF THE PLENUM EXHAUST AIR STATIC PRESSURE RISES ABOVE OR DROPS BELOW SETPOINT FOR AN ADJUSTABLE AMOUNT OF TIME. AN ALARM WILL GENERATED TO THE BAS. OVERRIDE PANEL CONTROL: THE OVERRIDE PANEL WILL HAVE AN H-O-A SWITCH FOR THE EXHAUST FAN TO BE OVERRIDEN ON OR OFF. OVERRIDE OFF CONTROL BOTH EXHAUST FANS WILL SHUT DOWN AND THE TWO-POSITION AND OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPER WILL CLOSE. DURING OVERRIDE OFF CONTROL. THE CONTROL POWER TO THE LOCAL FAN SWITCH IS INTERRUPTED. BUILDING OPERATOR WILL NOT BE ABLE TO START THE EXHAUST FANS IN THE HAND OR AUTO MODE. OVERRIDE ON CONTROL BOTH EXHAUST FANS SHALL BE COMMANDED TO RUN. THE CONTROL POWER TO THE LOCAL FAN H-O-A SWITCH IS BYPASS ED AND SENT STRAIGHT TO THE STARTER CONTACTOR. BUILDING OPERATOR WILL NOT BE ABLE TO STOP THE EXHAUST FANS IN THE HAND. OFF OR AUTO MODE. THE DAMPER OPERATION IS DEPENDENT UPON THE NUMBER EXHAUST FANS REPORTING STATUS. IF ONLY ON EXHAUST FAN IS RUNNING. THE TWO-POSITION DAMPER WILL CLOSE AND THE OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPER WILL OPEN 100%. IF BOTH EXHAUST FANS ARE REPORTING STATUS. THE AND OUTSIDE AIR BYPASS DAMPER WILL BE COMMANDED OPEN IDDIJA. ?353.142 5 O. 2:32am ?3:31.42 2625th -- EI ISeguence of Ogemtion HANDLER ES THE VIVARIUM. BEFORE THE AIR HANDLER STARTS. ONE OF TH RUI WILL START. ONCE AT LEAST ONE OF THE EXHAUST FANS IS VERIFIED BY CURRENT SENSOR THE AIR HANDLING UNIT WILL INDEXED ON. UPON A-START COMMAND. THE OUTSIDE AIR DAMPER WILL OPEN. ONCE-THE DAMPER IS OPEN1 AS PROVEN BYA DAMPER END SWITCH. BOTH SUPPLY FANS WILL START. ONCE IS ON. THE UNIT WILL RUN CONTINUOUSLY. UPON AIR FLOW VERIFICATION VIA THE SUPPLY FAN VFD. ALL CONTROL LOOPS WILL BE ENABLED AND ALL TERMINAL UNITS SERVED BY THIS UNIT WILL BE IN DEXED TO THE OCCUPIED MODE. WHEN THE AIR HANDLING UNIT IS SHUTDOWN ALL CONTROL LOOPS WILL BE DISABLED. AND THE OUTSIDE AIR DAMPER WILL SLOWLY CLOSE TO PREVENT STATIC PRESSURE CONDITIONS. SUPPLY FAN VFD CONTROL: THE SUPPLY FAN WILL MODULATE VIA THE SAME CONTROL SIGNAL AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN THE SUPPLY AIR STATIC PRESSURE SETPOINTOF (ADJ.). SUPPLY FAN VFD SOFT START CONTROL: BOTH SUPPLY FANS VFDS WILL HAVE AN UNLOADED FAN START SEQUENCE (SOFT START) TO ENSURE THAT THE FANS START AT MINIMUM POSITION AND ARE SLOWLY RAMPED TO CONTROL TEMPERATURE CONTROL: THE HOT WATER VALVES AND CHILLED WATER VALVES WILL MODULATE IN SEQUENCE AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN DISCHARGE AIR TEMPERATURE SETPOI NT. HEATING COILI E. UME CONTROL: WHEN THE OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURE IS BELOW 40F AND THE UNIT IS OFF. THE HEATING COIL FREEZE PROTECTION PUMPS WILL START. THE PUMPS WILL BE OFF AT ALL OTHER TIMES. FILTER MONITORING: WILL BE GENERATED AT THE OWS WHEN THE FILTER DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE EXCEEDS SETPOI NT. SAFETIES AND ALARMS: UPON A DROP IN TEMPERATURE BELOW SETPOINT. AS SENSED BY THE TEMPERATURE LOW THE AIR HANDLING UNIT WILL SHUTDOWN AND AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE OWS. UPON A SIGNAL FROM THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. AS SENSED BYA SMOKE DETECTOR IN THE SUPPLY AIR DUCT OR THE ASSOCIATED EXHAUST AIR DUCT AND SENT TO THE FIRE-ALARM SYSTEM. THE AIR HANDLING UNIT WILL SHUTDOWN AND AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE OWS. IF THE SUPPLY FAN VFD H-O-A SWITCH IS OUT OF THE AUTO POSITION FOR MORE THAN 10 MINUTES (ADJ). AN ALARM WILL BE THE OWS. FAN THE STATUS OF THE SUPPLY FANS WILL BE MONITORED VIA THE VFDS. UPON SENSING THAT BOTH SUPPLY FAN ARE OFF. THE DDC CONTROLLER WILL CLOSE THE OUTSIDE AIR DAMPER, CLOSE THE CHILLED WATER VALVES. AND OPEN THE HEATING VALVES TO MAINTAIN A HEATING DISCHARGE TEMPERATURE OF (ADM. OVERRIDE PANEL . THE OVERRIDE PANEL WILL HAVE AN H-O-A SWITCH FOR THE AIR HANDLING UNIT TO BE OVERRIDEN ON OR OFF. IF THE SWITCH IS PLACED IN ALL SAFETIES WILL BE OVERRIDEN. FAILURE DISABLE AND RESTART: UPON A UTILITY POWER FAILURE. ALL SYSTEMS WILL SHUTDOWN. WHEN THE POWER IS RESTORED THE SYSTEM WILL RESTART BASED ON A PRIORITY RESTART SCHEDULE AND OPERATE UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS. SAFETY: SAFETY DEVICES WILL BE PROVEN MANUAL AND AUTOMATIC OPERATION BEFORE THE UNIT WILL START. ALL OF THE SAFETY DEVICES ARE MANUAL THE DEVICE THAT HAS TRIPPED MUST BE MANUALLY RESET BEFORE RESTARTING THE AIR HANDLING UNIT. IF A TEMPERATURE LOW LIMIT SWITCH SENS ES A TEMPERATURE BELOW SETPOINT THE SUPPLY FAN WILL BE SHUTDOWN AND AN ALARM WILL BE-GENERATED AT THE BAS. UPON A SIGNAL FROM THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. AS SENSED BY A SMOKE DETECTOR IN THE SUPPLY AIR DUCT OR THE ASSOCIATED EXHAUST AIR DUCT AND SENT TO THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. THE AIR HANDLING WILL SHUTDOWN AND AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE BAS. IF A HIGH STATIC PRESSURE SWITCH LOCATED AFTER THE SUPPLY FAN SENSES A DISCHARGE PRESSURE THAT IS GREATER THAN SETPOINT. THE SUPPLY FAN WILL BE SHUTDOWN AND AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE BAS. IF A LOW STATIC PRESSURE SWITCH LOCATED BEFORE THE EXHAUST FAN SENSES A DISCHARGE PRESSURE THAT IS BELOW SETPOINT, THE EXHAUST FAN WILL BE SHUTDOWN AND AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE BAS. IF THE SUPPLY FAN VFD SWITCH IS OUT OF THE AUTO POSITION FOR MORE THAN 10 MINUTES (ADJ). AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE OWS. WHEN THE UNIT IS SHUTDOWN EITHER BY A FAILURE OF SUPPLY FANS. STOP COMMAND OR SYSTEM SAFETY THE UNIT WILL BE SET AS FOLLOWS: BOTH SUPPLY FANS WILL BE OFF OUTSIDE AIR ISOLATION DAMPER WILL CLOSE COOLING VALVE AND PREHEAT COIL WILL REMAIN IN CONTROL EXHAUST FAN WILL CONTINUE TO RUN TERMINAL UNITS WILL BE INDEXED TO UNOCCUPIEO UPON A SINGLE SUPPLY FAN FAILURE AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE BAS AND THE UNIT WILL CONTINUE TO RUN. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Friday. September 24. 2010 0:56 AM To: Walpole. Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFU) Subject: FW: Questions FYI Thanks, Paul 404-639-135 05 From: Probstf Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 11:26 AM To:. Moss, Karen Subject: Questions Karen: 1. Cassette tape is suitable for tell-tales. If contractor has problem getting some ofthat, am sure it can be provided. 2. Regarding pressure differential testing for personnel egress, this is not necessary as it is understood that the controls program has not changed other than adjustable setpoin'ts. However, if the control program has to be re- downloaded into the 0X91 00, then it is advisable and considered prudent to verify egress pressures. FMEO cannot ensure the provisions for a workstation on the SB interstitial level. I would advise JCI to the workstation on the is"l Floor or the Penthouse. This is something .101 did on the project to install th AHU. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Din. Operations BFOiFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Walpoie. Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:19 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFCJ) Subject: RE: Bubble Tight Dampers As far as know, none of the Bubble Tights serving the Vivarium are tied into the EAS. From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 11:52 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Bubble Tight Dampers Ken: I know the Bubble Tights are automatically controlled on 1st Floor, but unsure for Vivarium. If associated with BAS, they mayr need numbering (at least in code) Thanks. Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 11:49 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCDDIBFO) Subject: Bubble Tight Dampers Paul, Do you know if these dampers are numbered? The contractor sent a RFI requesting what to number the new dampers. Karen Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: TEASE-830T Cell: 4044325002? Fax: mail: KMoss1@cdc.gov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 12:19 PM W, To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: FW: P2009453 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 8:50 AM To: Mickle, Lenore Cc: Harris, Teresa Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Lingler, Arthur R. Prolet, Paul E. Raymond, George Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Lenore, Please see attached RFC. 2009453 A201.de 2009453 A101.de Specifications.de Appendix.de TEMPLATE- Document Tracki. .. Best Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-BT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: noses-33m Cell: 404-325-6812? Fax: mesa-2557 email: K?ossl ?Eilcdogov CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROLAND PREVENTION Building and Facilities Office! Procurement anti-Grants Of?ce REQUEST FOR CONTRACT PURCHASE ORDER Project Number: P2009453 Project Name: Building 13 HVAC Modi?cations - -- - USE Period of Performance: October-'1, 2010 through January 31, 2011 FPAA Status: Approved on July 28, 2010 Proposed Acquisition Start Date: August 2, 2010 Independent Government $510,000 Estimate (IGE) for this Contract: Total Budget for'Project $676,500 CAN: 939ZDPD Purpose?of ContractfPO Construction contract Contract Documents: Prepared in?liouse, to be transmitted electronically Schedule of Deliverables: Yes, included in SOW Suggested Source for Solicitation: 8(a) Set Aside Proiect Manager: Karen Moss. '1 Date of. Contracting Of?cer?s 10!02i2009 Technical Representative Training: Project Manager for. execution of i requested Contract: 3 Date-of Centracting Of?cer?s 0611-92009 TechnicalRepresentative Training . Em Wk? .- - rule? -- 3591413 19"? Change to clean corridor onl .. TechnicalEi'aluation MA Criteria: Government Property to be No government property utilized utilized: Government Property to be No government property to be salvaged salvaged: Liquidated Damages: 272.51lday Commissioning: Yes, as described in SOW Key Personnel: Willis Mechanical/BFOIOHS Utilities Provided by Water: yes Government Electricity: yes Gas: yes Restroom Access: yes Waste Disposal: no JOFOC: No have reviewed the above Request for Contract RF C) to ensure all required information is provided in the prescribed format and performed a technical review of the Statement of Work. Attachments to this RFC include a copy of the SOW. Submitted by . mm Pro'ecl Manager Project Manager for execution of requested contract In Leader Team Leader Submitted to P00 Team Leaders Copied to P00 Director and BFO Directors for all team members listed on this form CALCULATION OF LIQUIDATED DAMAGES DATE: momma PROJECT: .: L0 Roy bat . BY: KEM PROJECT NO: P2009453 BFO PERSONNEL ROJ EQT OF GER Daily Project Administration {33-13 step 5Q $03.25 ihr 1.0 hrsioay $53.20 fday Weekly site visits 05-13 step 5 $63.25 Ihr 4.0 hrsr?wit $253.04 Per Diem $0.00 Iday 0 daysin $0.00 Air Fare $0.00 itn?p 0 tripsiwk $0.00 Rental Car $0.00 May it 0 days?iwlt $0.00 SUBTOTAL $253.04 5 $50.51 iday TEAM LEADER Montth site visits (35-14 step 5 (i $7420 ihr 3.0 hrsimo $224.20 Psrdiem $0.00 May it 0 daystmo $0.00 Air Fare $0.00 Jtrip 0 Iripsimo $0.00 SUBTOTAL $224.20 {-22 5 $10.10 iday SECRETARY G343 step5 $26.99 1.0 hrsiday $20.00 May BFO supplies. phone 0 postage $4.20 inlay CONTRACT SPECIALEST Daily Project Administration (38-13 step 5 (I: $03.20 ihr 1.0 hrsiday $53.25 May Weekly site visits {38-13 step 5.6 $63.20 ihr 2.0 hrsiwlt $126.52 Per Diem $0.00 idayr' it 0 $0.00 Air Fare $0.00 Itrip 0 $0.00 Rental Car $0.00 iday 0 $0.00 . SUBTOTAL $126.52 I 5 $25.30 iday CONTRACTING OFFICER site visits step 5 $31.26 3.0 $224.28 Per0iem $0.00 {day 0 daysimo $0.00 Air Fare $0.00 {trip it 0 tripsimo $0.00 SUBTOTAL $224.23 I 22 $10.19 100}! SECRETARY GS-B steps $26-09 ihr 0.5 $13.50 Ida}! PGO supplies. phone a postage $5.00 May TOTAL LIQUIDATED DAMAGES $210.51 Inlay Governmentpersonnel costs caicuiateo using Civilian Position Full Fringe Benefit CostFaotor from OMB Circular No. A30. "Performance of Commercial Activities? and 0PM 2010 hourly wage table for Atlanta Both web pages accessed 010.2010. 2:55 pm. Thereare 5 working days in a week. There are approximately 22 working days in an average month (based on approximater 201 weekdays in a year]. Page 1744 {b){3)742 use. 252mm Page 1?45 262a?h) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEIU) BUILDING INFORMATION Fan AND PREVENTION SPECIFICATIONS un?t-42 U5 C. 262mm ROYBAL CAMPUS CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION 1600 CLIFTON ROAD, NE ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30333 cm: PROJECT NUMBER P2009453 July15, 2010 SENSITIVE EIUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) Sensitive But Unclassified information must be protected from general release to the public. SBU information, both hard copy and electronic formats, should be physically protected and stored in limited areas. This document contains information that may be exempt from public release under the Freedom of Information Act USC 552). Exemptioms) #3 apply. Approval by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Document Control Of?cer, Office of Security and Emergency Preparedness. and the CDC FOIA Of?cer, prior to the public release via the FOIA Office is required. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 Section 00010-1 I Table ?Contents SECTION 00010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title SERIES 0 DOCUMENTS 00001 Cover Sheet 00010 Table of Contents DIVISION 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 01010 Summary of Work 01039 Coordination and Meetings 01090 Reference Standards 01300 Suhmittals 01311 Network Analysis 01351 Sustainable Proieot Requirements 01400 Quality Control Procedures 01500 Temporary Facilities and Controls 01546 Health and Safety 01547 Personnel Security Requirements 01700 Contract Closeout 01710 Cleaning DIVISION 2 SITE CONSTRUCTION 02225 Minor Demolition for Remodeling DIVISION 4 MASONRY 04065 Masonry Mortar and Grout 04310 Unit Masonry Assemblies DIVISION 7 - THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION 07900 Joint Sealers DIVISION 8 - DOORS AND WINDOWS 08115 Standard Steel Frames 03225 Fiberglass Reinforced Polyester Doors 03710 Door Hardware DIVISION 9 - FINISHES 09721 Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) Acrylic Flooring 09900 Paints and Coatings SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE EIUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION :13 us I: SECIIOH 00010?2 252mm. .. of Contents DIVISION 10 - SPECIALTIES 10260 Metal Wall Guards DIVISION 15 - MECHANICAL 15050 Basic Mechanical Materials and Methods 15060 Variable Frequencyr Drives and Controls 15075 Mechanical Identification 15080 Mechanical Insulation 1512i] Piping Specialties 15180 Heating and Cooling Piping 15752 Air Coils 15810 Ducts 15840 Air Terminal Units Appendix A Drawing and Mechanical Cuisheets END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION [bj[3}242 2522201} coc P2009453 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Sectiontll 01 0-1 SECTION 01010 SUMMARY OF WORK FOR SOLUTION ORDER CONCEPT (SOC) PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. This section includes the following: Scepe of Work. Work by the Government. Government Furnished Products. Contractor use of site and premises. Work Sequence. Government occupancy. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Related sections include the following: Section 01300 - Submittals Section 01311 - Network Analysis Schedules Section 01546 - Health and Safety Section 01'547 Personnel Security Requirements Section 01 YOU - Project Closeout 1.3 PROJECT METHOD A. Project Delivery Method: The method of delivery for this project is a Solution Order Concept (SOC). The SOC is characterized by the following elements: 1. The SOC is a process that does not utilize conventional design services. thereby empowering the Contractor to become very involved in the project?s earliest stages. The Contractor. as a team member with CDC. will be expected to provide suggestions. ask questions. and offer potential alternative methods. systems, or products to the Scope of Work provided by CDC. The SOC process is based on CDC and the Contractor meeting at the site. reaching consensus on the scope. schedule. and cost of the project, con?rming all agreements in writing. awarding the contract. and executing the work. Site Visit. The purpose of the site visit is to convey technical objectives for the project (80W) to the Contractor and to be a working meeting that moves the team closer to the ?nal definition of the project's scope. While all systems. materials. and issues may not be selected or settled during this site visit. all known issues should be revealed and discussed. a. Required Attendees: Contractor's Project Manager and Superintendent; each major trade sub contractor's Project Manager. CDC Contracting Of?cer. CIMO (andior DEMO) Project Managerial. design discipline experts. COTR. and Building Manager: program representativeis); and appropriate support personnel from OHS, ITSO. OSEP, and similar programs. b. A follow up site meeting may be appropriate if additional information or clari?cation is required. PGO Request for Proposal. After the SOW has been re?ned. PGO will send the Solicitation. Otter. and Award document and attachments to the Contractor for pricing. Contractor's Proposal. The Contractor?s proposal includes a schedule. scope. cost. and submittal materials as appropriate and required in the SOW to provide a solution to the requirements de?ned by the SOW and other components of the Solicitation. The following are technical SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) :bttEl' US I: 2623-h; CDC P2009453 Section01010-2 .HVAC MODIFICATIONS FORI I Summary of Work requirements for the initial proposal to be subm?ted to the Contracting Officer (also refer to Section 01300): a. Demonstrate compliance with the sow. b. cost for the work and services broken down by building and detailed down to the trade by work activity. number of lab or hours. and hourly costs. c. Equipment and material cut sheets, shop drawings. and product data. including MSDS sheets as appropriate. d. Provide alternatives fro consideration by CDC as appropriate. e. Construction schedule of activities. This would include necessary utilityoutages with duration estimates. 3. Technical Evaluation. The technical evaluation by CDC will include. but may not be limited to. the foilowing: 1. Verification of Compliance with-the 80W. 2. Acceptance or rejection of Equipment and Materials submittats. 3. Acceptance or rejection of required submittals. shop drawings. samples. and all other information required by the 30W. 4. Evaluation of Construction Activity Schedule. 5. Cost proposal. C. Award. The criteria for award are contained in the Solicitation. Offer; and Award document and attachments as issues by the Contracting Officer for this project. 1. Upon receipt of the contract. the Contractor shall execute any other non-site speci?c requirements of the contract. such as ordering items with long lead times. shop fabrication of assemblies. initiation of shop-drawings and other submittals processes. update or partial short circuit andcoordination study (if required}. and all other activities to insure the project shall be completed according to the project scope. cost. and schedule. D. Notice to Proceed. The information in this paragraph in no way supersedes. negates. otdefines the requirements contained in the Soiicitation, Otter; and Award document issued by the Contracting Officer for this project. 1. Upon receipt of all requirements in the Solicitation. O?'er. and Awarddocument relating to award of Notice to Proceed (NTP). the Contracting Officer will. at the preconstruction meeting with the Contractor. issue the NTP with the following understanding that the Contractor shall do the following .activitie s: a. Proceed with preparation of submittals. shop drawings. project schedule. and other similar requirements in the contract. - b. Not'be allowed on site until the requirements of Section 015W PersonneiSecurity have been ful?lled for the Contractor's Project Manager and Superintendent. c. Provide the requirements of the Preliminary Outline Schedule in Section [11311 Network Anaiysis Scheduies at the preconstruction meeting. d. Commence personnel security process on remaining staff for project. e. Not be allowed to commence work on site until the Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan has been approved by the Contracting Officer. 1.4 DESCRIPTION OF WORK A. The Work of this project comprises certain repairs and improvements to the exiisting interior of Building located at Roybal campus. These repairs and improvements include. but are not limited to. the following aspects as further'defined and described in the Contract Documents: SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED Sectionmtl?i 0-3 I Mechanical 1. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 15. 18. 19. 20. 21. Summary of Work Tap into the side of the existing 72 14 supply ductwork in interstitial space and route new ductwork to new pneumatic phoenix supply valve. See appendix for duct lay out and phoenix valve selection. Contractor to field verify tit and routing of new ductwork with existing conditions. Route all main ductwork as high as possible. Transition from new phoenix valve outlet to 26 18 heating coil. See appendix for attached heating coil selection. Core slab penetrations as shown on attached sketch and per architectural and structural requirements. Slab penetration locations to be determined by nondestructive testing. Nondestructive testing to be done on the first day of the lab shut down to verify that no conduit is in the slab at proposed openings. Nondestructive testing to be done under separate CDC contract. Route new ductwork from the new phoenix valve through these new slab penetrations to new supply air diffusers in the corridor. Provide out of floor ?re damper Ruskin Model D10320 (Type BC) in interstitial before slab penetration. Install per manufacturer and SMACNA ?re damper out of installation instructions. Diffusers shall be 24 10: Titus model number Provide manual opposed blade volume damper [Titus AGE-95) in the interstitial at duct branch take off slab penetration. Provide gas tight bubble damper at each diffuser. Tap into existing hot water supply and return pipes and route new 1? pipes to new reheat coil. Provide new hot water two way control valve to match existing control valves at existing heating coils. Provide all associated controls and devices to make a complete supply system. Insulate supply ductwork and hot water pipe. All devices. materials and equipment to match existing unless specified otherwise. Provide missing opposed blade balancing dampers on existing ductwork as identified by baseline Test and Balance Report. Provide new temperature sensor in exhaust duct to phoenix valve 8-164 to control new heating coil. Provide paintable silicone to seal diffusers in corridor. Remove existing exhaust grille in elevator lobby room architectural requirements. Replace two counterbalanced isolation dampers atl dampers to be sized and selected by fan manufacturer. Contractor to field verify dimensions before ordering dampers. Replace two low leakage motorized bypass dampers atl to be sized and selected by fan manufacturer. Contractor to ?eld verify dimensions before ordering. Provide motor sheaves for fans if required by Test and Balance after construction and during commissioning. Tap into existing exposed elbow and add new stainless steel thermal double wall 12 10 supply ductwork in shower anteroom. route to new 12 12 diffuser; Titus Model number SOORS-SS with opposed blade balancing damper. Contractor to field verify existing conditions for location and fit of ductwork and diffuser. Test and Balance of exhaust and supply systema in the Vivarium to be done under separate contract. (mam uses to pressurize uses 2.6.2ail1i Near the end of construction Test and Balance will perform preliminary fan SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION {sour coc P2009453 .hltac. MODIFICATIONS FOR 1 4:13.42 LIE '3 262alh,? 22. IJS 262cm} 24. 25. 26. .. .. seal air leakage at existing six SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (EBUJ Section010?l 0-4 I Summary of Work Repairtorn and add missing insulation on ductwork and pipe for all pipe and ductwork related to -- I. Identify location of 3: plugs for future. ?re dampers located in the interstitial that serves the clean corridors. Contractor to provide drawings. Provide shop drawings. and submiltals via hard copy and electronically. Contractor shall provide detailed sheet metal and pipe shop drawings for CDC approval. Glass slot size shall be veri?ed with CDC before ordering glass. Control Work 1. Modify existing two position control dampers to a modulating damper. Damper will modulate in unison with existing replaced control damper to control duct static pressure. Control Sequence shall be as follows: 1. Fans shall be automatically starledl?stopped by the BAS system. Fans shall operate 24 hoursfday. 7 dayslweek once sequenced on. 2. H-O-A switch for each fan shall be monitored. If HOA switch is positioned in the off or hand position. an alarm shall be generated. 3. Fan status shall be monitored by a current switch. 4. During fan operation. BAS system shall modulate both control dampers located at the roof exhaust plenum in unison to maintain exhaust static pressure setpoint. Initial setpoint shall be TAB Company to determine ?nal setpoint. 5. On a fan failure as sensed by one of the two current switches. an alarm shall be sent. Exhaust plenum control dampers shall continue to modulate maintaining exhaust duct static pressure setpoint. 6. On failure of both fans as sensed by either current switches an alarm shall be generated. Upon drop in exhaust duct static below 1.75? (adj) below setpointl an alarm shall be generated. 7. On a drop in exhaust duct static pressure 1.0? (adj) below setpoint. an alarm shall be generated. B. On a drop in exhaust duct static pressure below 1.5" (adi) associated AHU shall stop. gift? 3 . 9.. .. of associated with ex assensed by ?no? airflow at the airflow station. exhaust fans -- - Iexhaustplenum capital dampers shall modulate to maintain .. exhaustduct static. If low duct static cannot be maintained. stop and dampers will modulate to maintain static setpoint. 10. Smoke control shall continue to function as currently programmed. 11. Fireman's override panel shall continue to function as currently programmed. - . Architectural I U'b Remove door: and ?ll opening with concrete masonry. Finish wall with epoxy paint. 2. Provide new window in new infill wall. I 3. Provide new concrete masonry wall in FRaning door in new masonry wall. Install metal wall guards at masonry wall. Finish wall with epoxy paint. 4. Remove existing directional airflow 'ping?pong' indicator devices from approximately 33 doors. Install manufacturer supplied caps to resulting penetrations in walls.Provide new rubber door sweepslhotioms to approximately 12 doors. 5. Remove existing vision glass from approximately 30 doors. Replace with new glass sized to leave air gaps in doors. 6. Provide new full gasket sets to three sets of doors. Resulting door assemblies to seal to gas-tight condition when closed. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ [Chi-42 LIE: [5 as. (strata sag - SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED CDC P2009453 SECIIOHUT 010-5 Summary of Work WORK BY THE GOVERNMENT A. The Government has a direct contract with the test and balance ?rm. CDC will also decontaminate the area prior to commencement of work in the animal area and after completion of work. No other work by CDC is anticipated for this Project. 1.5 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PRODUCTS A. No products or materials will be furnished by the Government for this Project. 1.6 CONTRACTOR USE OF SITE AND PREMISES A. Limit use of site and premises to allow: 1. Regular and continued use of. and access to. immediate area around Buildings 15. 16. 18. 21. and 23. adjacent walkways and CDC parking area. B. Construction Operations: Limit construction operations to the areas noted on drawings. Government security at CDC facilitieS requires that the Contractor and all agents remain in the area designated by the limit of work in the Contract Documents. Failure to observe this requirement is grounds for dismissal of the offending party. Repeated violations may be grounds for dismissal of the Contractor. or agent at fault. or both. 1 Contractors on exterior projects shall not be allowed access to the interior of any CDC building. except to perform work scheduled in an interior space. C. Time Restrictions for Performing Work: All Work which cannot be performed during normal duty hours shall require the Contractor to submit a schedule of anticipated Work to the Contracting Officer prior to execution of the Work. This includes utility outages. work on Federal holidays. and other activities. Known activities include the following: 1. Utility Outages and Shutdown: The Contractor shall arrange with the Contracting Officer. Utility outages and associated work shall be scheduled from 6:00 pm to 6:00 am. Monday through Thursday. or 6:00 pm. Friday. to 5:00 am. Monday. The Contractor shall request such outages a minimum of 10 days prior to shutdown. There shall be no exceptions to the 10 day minimum requirement. 2. Work on Weekends, Federal holidays and other requests: The Contractor shall arrange with the Contracting Of?cer. The Contractor shall provide such request a minimum of 5 days prior to scheduled Work. D. Site Conditions: The Contractor. shall upon completion of the Work, repair, alter. remove. andlor replace exterior materials to conform to each material's condition prior to commencement of work. E. Project Cleanup and Closeout. An amount equal to 10% of the contract amount. including all modi?cations. will be held by the Contracting Officer until all project cleanup and closeout requirements have been performed by the Contractor and acceptable to the Contracting Officer. 1. Project cleanup and closeout issues that the Contractor shall be responsible for include. but are not limited to. the following: a) Removal of all debris. excess materials. and equipment brought on site by the Contractor or SENSITIVE our UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION issui CDC P2009453 .. HHAC .. .. .. I USE SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION ectionO1010?B Summary of Work any agent of the Contractor. b) Removai. replacement, or refurbishment as required of all Government utilities used during execution of the work. c) Submission and resubmission if required. of all closeout documents required by this project. These include resolution of final inspection listing, operating and maintenance manuals. staff training. warranty information, as?built documents. and others as listed in the relevant speci?cation sections. Prior to Final Acceptance. the Contractor shall request a review of these issues by the Contracting Of?cer. Upon successful completion of the review. and when all defective issues have been resolved to the satisfaction of the Contracting Of?cer. the affected funds will be released. Limit use of site and premises to aliow: 1. 2. Government occupancy of the building. Use of site and adjacent spaces by the Government and the public for normal daily operations and functions. GOVERNMENT (USER) OCCUPANCY A. People (CDC employeesl'visitors) in Building will occupy its premises. including but not iimited to the project area. during the entire period of construction. Contractor is to keep in consideration the access and egress needs of these occupants. B. Cooperate with the Government. represe.? by the Contracting Officer, to minimize con?ict. and to facilitate the daily operations of Building as well as other buildings and facilities on the Roybal Campus. C. Schedule the Work to accommodate this requirement. 1.8 DOCUMENT SECURITY A. Document security is important to the Government. The documents provided to you in any format are sensitive and you must take provisions to protect the con?dentiality of the information. The requirements below are intended to supplement CDC's current documents security policy. By acceptance of any printed or electronic documents. you agree to the following: 1. 2. :5 The documents shall not be transmitted to a third party without written permission of the Contracting Of?cer. Refer to Part 2 of this specification section forthe Document Tracking Log. All documents shall be returned at the conclusion of the project. No documents shalt be kept for any purpose by you. your firm. or any of your subcontractors, suppliers. or agents. Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. Ali electronic ?les shall be deleted from storage devices (computers. zip drives. hand held devices. and such). Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. All CDIDVD and magnetic disk shall be retUmed to the Contracting Officer. Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. All devices that contain electronic information shall be protected by password. All printed documents shall be stored in a secure area until returned to the Contracting Officer. Return of all required documents and media shall be part of the project's completion and closeout requirements. and shall be satisfactorily completed prior to approval of final invoice. 1.9 GOVERNMENT USE OF THE SITE SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section?tDtD-T estrus-Ci . A. Interior: The following is a brief description of Government use of the site that may have varying effects on the execution of the Work required under this contract. 1. The requirements and demands for Government operations. schedules, and programs in Building 13 will continue to occur throughout the construction period. Response to these requirements and demands will be met by the Government in spaces adjacent to the project area. Therefore, it is very critical that construction activities for this project. including workers. equipment. and materials. have minimal potential for disruption to Government activities in the spaces adjacent to the project location. Notify and coordinate with project of?cer when interior occupants could be affected by exterior work activities. B. Exterior: The following is a brief description of Government use of the site that may have varying effects on the execution of the Work required under this contract. 1. The operation and function of the adjacent buildings and spaces will continue during the construction period of this project. Pedestrians. vehicles, equipment. and goods will continue to be present in adjacent exterior spaces to the construction site. 2. A schedule of Contractor vehicular movement of dumpsters. deliveries. and other similar issues shall be provided to the Contracting Of?cer for approval to maintain safety and minimize disruptions and conflicts to all parties. Activities concerning placement of dumpsters and storage ti. removal of hazardous materials will only be executed after guidance from the Project Of?cer. 3. The Contractor shall provide a delivery schedule of all equipment and materials to the Contracting Officer at least 10 calendar days prior to the earliest scheduled delivery that requires the use of the loading dock. The Contracting Of?cer will coordinate Government use of the loading dock with Contractor requests and accommodate such requests to the greatest extent possible. 1.10 CONTRACTOR ACTIONS UPON NOTICE OF CONTRACT AWARD A. The information in this paragraph in no way supercedes. negates. or defines the requirements contained in the Contract. Unless otherwise Speci?cally addressed with different requirements in the Contract terms and conditions. the Contractor shall immediately initiate the following actions upon receipt of the Notice of Award: 1. Ful?ll requirements of Section 0154? Personnel Security Requirements for the Contractor=s Superintendent and Project Manager. The Contractor will not be allowed on site until these requirements are met. The Government will not be responsible nor liable for any delays to the Work for the Contractor?s inability or failure to obtain timely clearances or suf?cient numbers of cleared personnel. 2. Prepare and submit to the Contracting Officer the required Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan. The Contractor will not be allowed to commence work on site until the Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan has been approved by the Contracting Of?cer. Any delays caused by the Contractor's failure to obtain an approved Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan shall be attributed to the Contractor and shall not be considered an excusable delay. 3. Take action and complete all effort necessary to produce and present the Preliminary Outline Schedule in 01311 Network Analysis Schedules at the preconstruction meeting. The Contractor shall be Considered delinquent in performance if these documents are not ready for presentation at the preconstruction meeting. 4. Commence personnel security process on project's workers. 5. Proceed with preparation of submittals. shop drawings. and other similar requirements of the contract. 6. Anticipate receiving formal Notice to Proceed from the Contracting Of?cer within 28 calendar SENSITIVE aur UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION out? :12 U5 a SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SELF) DC P2009453 Sectio n01 01 0-3 -- -- - - Summary of Work days after Notice of Award. It is customary. but not required, for the Contracting Offioerto issue Notice to Proceed at the preconstruction meeting. PART 2 PRODUCTS A. Document Tracking Log. Attachment is the form to be used upon approval bythe Contracting Of?cer of request to provide documents to a third party. as: TEMPLATE - ocucentTracI-cing L. PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) (b}(3}142 262a[h} 1.1_ A. B. 1.3 CDC P2009453 I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ Section 01039-1 Coordination and Meetings SECTION 01039 COORDINATION AND MEETINGS GENERAL SECTION INCLUDES Coordination. Progress meetings. COORDINATION Coordinate scheduling. submittals. and Work of the various sections of speci?cations to assure ef?cient and orderlyr sequence of installation of interdependent construction elements. with provisions for accommodating items to be installed later. Verify that utility requirement characteristics of operating equipment are compatible with building utilities. Coordinate work of various sections having interdependent responsibilities for instaliing. connecting to. and piacing in service such equipment. Coordinate space requirements and installation of mechanical and electrical work which are indicated diagrammatically on Drawings. Follow routing shown for pipes. ducts. and conduit as closer as practicable; place runs parallel with line of building. Utilize spaces ef?ciently to maximize accessibility for other installations, for maintenance. and for repairs. Coordinate completion and clean up of Work of separate sections in preparation for project completion. After the Government occupancy of premises. coordinate access to site for correction of defective work and Work not in accordance with Contract Documents. to minimize disruption of Government?s activities. PROGRESS MEETINGS Schedule and administer meetings with the Contracting Of?cer throughout progress of the Won-i at minimum weekiy intervals. Make arrangements for meetings. prepare agenda with copies for participants. preside at meetings. record minutes. and distribute copies within two days to Contracting Of?cer. participants. and those affected by decisions made. Attendance Required: Job superintendent. Contractor?s Proiect Manager. Contracting Of?cer. Project Of?cer. and others as appropriate to agenda topics for each meeting. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 C1 Agend m?P-?t . SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ Section 01039-2 Coordination and Meetings a: Review minutes of previous meetings. Review of Work progress. Field observations, problems, and decisions. Identi?cation of problems which impede planned progress. Review of submittais schedule and status of submittals. Review of off-site fabrication and delivery schedules. Updated progress schedule. Corrective measures to regain projected schedule. Planned progress during succeeding work period. Review of next two weeks scheduled work based on printed partial schedule given out during meeting. Coordination of projected, progress. Maintenance of quality and work standards. Effect of proposed changes on progress schedule and coordination. Safety Other business relating to Work. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ CDC P2009453 01090-4 I SECTION 01090 REFERENCE STANDARDS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. Quality assurance. B. Schedule of references. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Applicable Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) ctauses. 1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Quality assurance includes. but is not limited to. the following activities and requirements: 1, For products or workmanship specified by association. trades. or Federal Standards. comply with requirements of the standard. except when more rigid requirements are speci?ed or are required by applicable codes. Conform to reference standard by date of issue current on date for receiving bids. Obtain copies of standards when required by Contract Documents or when needed for compliance with Contract requirements. Maintain copy at jobsite. Should speci?ed reference standards conflict with Contract Documents. request clari?cation from Contracting Of?cer before proceeding. Contract Documents take precedence where there is conflict between reference standards and said Contract Documents .017? 1.4 SCHEDULE OF REFERENCES ACI American Concrete Institute AGC Associated General Contractors of America AISC American Institute of Steel Construction ANSI American National Standards Institute APA American Plywood Association ASHRAE American Society of Heating. Refrigerating. and Air-Conditioning Engineers ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials AWI Architectural Woodwork Institute AWPA American Wood Preservers' Association AWS American Welding Society AWWA American Water Works Association BHMA Builders Hardware Manufacturers Association CISPI Cast Iron Soil Pipe Institute CTI Ceramic Tile Institute of America DHI Door and Hardware Institute ETL ETL Testing Laboratory. Inc. FM Factory Mutual System SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI SENSITIVE BUT 01090-2 Reference Standards CDC P2009453 litigant?? HEXAGMQDIFICATIONS soa .. FS Federal Speci?cation GA Gypsum Association Institute of Electrical and Electronics MSS Manufacturer's Standardization Society of the Valves and Fittings Industry NEC National Electric Code NEMA National Electrical Manufacturers' Association NFPA National Fire Protection Association NPCA National Paint and Coatings Association OSHA OcCUpaiional Safety and Health Administration FDA Portland Cement Association PDCA Painting and Decorating Contractors of America PS Product Standard SEC Standard Building Code SDI Steel Deck Institute SDI Steel Door institute SJI Steel Joist Institute SMACNA Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors National Association SPIB Southern Pine Inspection Bureau TCA Tile Council of America UL Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. PART 2 PRODUCTS Not Used PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEUI 262301} SENSITIVE our UNCLASSIFIED CDC P2009453 Section 01300-1 Submittats SECTION 01300 SUBMITTALS PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Preparing and processing of submittals for review and action. 2. Preparing and processing of informational submittals. B. Submit the following for the Contracting Of?cer's review and action: 1. Shop drawings. . Structural design information required by the contract documents. Product data. Samples. Submittals indicated as "for approval." 2 3 4 5 Submit the following as informational submitters: 1 . Certificates. 2. Reports. 3 Ellualitication statements for manufacturersfinstallers. 4 Submittals indicated as "for information only." 5 Submittals for which procedures are not de?ned elsewhere. 5 1 2 paci?c submittals required are described in individual sections. . Provide other information required by Section 01546. . Provide other information required by Section 01547. 1.2 DEFINITIONS A. "Shop drawings" are drawings and other data prepared. by the entity that is to do the werk. specifically to show a portion of the work. B. "Product data submittals" are standard printed data which show or otherwise describe a product or system. or some other portion of the work. 1. Product data submittals also include: a. Performance curves. when issued by the manufacturer for all products of that type. b. Selection data showing standard colors. c. Wiring diagrams. when standard for all products of that type. C. "Samples" are actual examples of the products or work to be installed. D. Informational Submittals: Submittals identi?ed in the contract documents as to be submitted for information only. 1.3 FORM OF SUBMITTALS A. Sheets Larger Than inches by 14 inches: 1. Maximum sheet size: 36 inches by 48 inches. a. Exception: Full size pattern or template drawings. 2. Number of copies: a. Submittals for review: 1) One correctable reproducible print. not folded and 5 copies of blue- or black-tine printls). BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ 42 USA: 53 252.3- hi CDC P2009453 FDRour UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 01300-2 Submittals 2) Reproducible and 2 copies will be returned. b. lnformationalsubmittals: 1) 3 copies of opaque prints. 2) No copies will be returned. Small Sheets or Pages: 1. Minimum sheet size: 8-112 inches by1'l inches. 2. Maximum sheet size for opaque copies: 34:? inches by 14 inches. 3. Number of copies: a. Transparencies: Same as for larger sheets. b. Opaque copies: 1} For review: 5 copies- a) 3 copies will be retained. 2) Informational submittals: 3 copies Samples: 4 sets of each. 2 sets will be returned. If additional sets are needed by other entities involved in work represented by the sam pies, submit with original submittal. Copies in excess of the number requested will not be returned. Provide additional copies. if required for operating and maintenance data, marked to indicate their purpose. Provide additional copies for project record documents. Submittals requiring professional stamp andi'or signature shall be provided in original form in addition to the necessary number of copies. All originals will be retained by the Government. COORDINATION OF SUBMITTALS Coordinate submittals and activities that must be performed in sequence. so that the Contracting Officer has enough information to properly review the submittals. Coordinate submittais of different types for the same product or system so that the Contracting Of?cer has enough information to properly review each submittal. PART 2 PRODUCTS USED) PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 A. TIMING OF SUBMITTALS Transmit each submittal at or before the time indicated on the approved schedule of submittals. 1. Prepare and submit for approval a list of submittals and a scheduie showing the required dates of submittal of all submittals. Organize the schedule by the applicable specification section number. Incorporate the contractor's construction schedule specified elsewhere. Submit within 45 days after commencement of the work. Revise and resubmit the schedule for approval when requested. SENSITIVE BUT NCLASSIFIEO IN FDRMATIO (SB U) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ coo P2009453 Section mace-3 i I Submitlals 262a[h} B. Deliver each submittal requiring approval in time to allow for adequate review and processing time. including resubmittals if necessary; failure of the Contractor in this respect will not be considered as grounds for an extension of the contract time. C. Deliver each informational submittal prior to start of the work involved. unless the submittal is of a type which cannot be prepared until after completion of the work: submit D. If a submiltal must be processed within a certain time in order to maintain the progress of the work. state so clearly on the submittal. E. Allow a minimum of 10 business days for the ?rst processing of each submittal. Allow more time when submittals must be coordinated with later submittals. F. Allow a minimum of 5 business days for processing of resubmittals. 3.2 PROCEDURES - GENERAL A. Contractor Review: Sign transmittal form for each submittal certifying compliance with the requirements of the contract documents. 3. Notify the Contracting Officer. in writing and at time of submittal. of all points upon which the submittal does not conform to the requirements of the contract documents. if any. C. Do not commence work which requires review of any submittals until receipt of returned submitlals with an acceptable action. D. Do not allow submittals without an acceptabte action marking to be used for the project. E. Do not submit substitute items that have not been approved by means of the procedure speci?ed elsewhere. F. Do not include requests for substitution {either direct or indirect} on submittals; with procedures for substitutions speci?ed elsewhere. G. Preparation of Submittals: 1. Label each copy of each submittal. with the following information: Project name. Date of submittal. Contractor?s name and address. Contracting Of?cers name and address. Subcontractor's name and address. Suppliers name and address. Manufacturer?s name. Specification section where the submittal is speci?ed. Numbers of applicable drawings and details. . Other necessary identifying information. Pack submittals suitably for shipment. 3. Submittals to receive Contracting Of?cer's action marking: Provide blank space on the label or on the submittal itself for action marking; minimum 4 inches wide by 5 inches high. H. Transmittal of Submittals: 1. Submit all submittals to the Contracting Of?cer. 2. Submittals will be accepted from the Contractor only. Submittals received from other entities will be returned without review or action. 3. Submittals received without a transmittal form will be returned without review or action SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 Foal. .. . . I [blIBix-IZ IJE C: . 3.3 3.4 3.5 SENSITIVE our UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (ssuI Section 01300-4 Submittals Transmittal form: Use a form acceptable to the Goyemment; provide space on form for: Project name. Submittal date. Transmittal number. Speci?cation section number. To: From: Contractor's name. Subcontractors and supplier?s names. Manufacturer?s name. Submittal type (shop drawing. product data. samplel informational submittaI]. Description of submittal. Records of distribution. Action marking. The Contractor's certi?cation signature. . Comments. ill out a separate transmittal form for each submittal; also include the following: Other relevant information. Requests for additional information. grammars-ceases SHOP DRAWINGS Content: Include the following information: 1. Dimensions, at accurate scale. 2. All field measurements that have been taken. at accurate scale. 3. Names of speci?c products and materials used. 4. Details. identi?ed by contract document sheet and detail numbers. 5. Show compliance with the speci?c standards referenced. 6. Coordination requirements; show relationship to adjacent or critical work. T. Name of preparing ?rm. Preparation: 1. Reproductions of contract documents are not acceptable as shop drawings. 2. Copies of standard printed documents are not acceptable as shop drawings. 3 Identify as indicated for all submittals. 4 Space for Contracting Officer's action marking shall be adjacent to the title block. PRODUCT DATA Submit all product data submittals for each system or unit of work as one submittal. Content: 90s:- Submit manufacturer?s standard printed data sheets. Identify the particular product being submitted; submit only pertinent pages. Show compliance with properties speci?ed. Identify which options and accessories are applicable. Include recommendations for application and use. Show compliance with the speci?c standards referenced. Show compliance with speci?ed testing agency listings; show the limitations of their labels or seals. if any. identify dimensions which have been verified by field measurement. Show special coordination requirements forthe product. SAMP LES SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ WW 5 CDC P2009453 Section 01300-5 262ain} Submitting A. Samples: 1. Where unavoidable variations must be expected. submit "range" samples. minimum of 3 units, and describe or identify variations among units of each set. 2. Where selection is required. provide full set of all options. B. Preparation: 1. Attach a description to each sample. 2. Attach name of manufacturer or source to each sample. 3. Where compliance with speci?ed properties is required. attach documentation showing compliance. 4. Where there are limitations in availability. delivery, or other similar characteristics. attach description of such limitations. 5. Where selection is required. the first submittal may be a single set of all options; after return of submittal with selection indicated. submit standard number of sets of selected item 3.5 REVIEW OF SUBMITTALS A. Submittats for approval will be reviewed, marked with appropriate action. and returned. B. Infon'national submittals: Submittals will be reviewed. RETURN, RESUBMITTAL. AND DISTRIBUTION A. Submittals will be returned to the Contractor by mail. B. Perform resubmittals in the same manner as original submitlals: indicate all changes other than those requested by the Contracting Of?cer. C. Distribution: 1. Distribute returned submittals to all subcontractors and suppliers involved in work covered by the submittai. 2, Record distribution on transmittal form with copy to the Contracting Officer. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION :12 U5 CDC P2009453 .HVAC MODIFICATIONS-FOR- -- - SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) 01311-1 Network Analysis Schedules SECTION 01311 NETWORK ANALYSIS SCHEDULES PART 1. GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. The Contractor is required by this contract to provide. operate. and maintain a detailed Critical Path Method (CPM) progress schedule and components as described below. This 0PM schedule shall be the Contractor?s working schedule and shall be used to plan. organize. and execute the work. record and report actual performance and progress, and show how the Contractor plans to complete all remaining work as of the end of each progress report period. 1. In preparing the CPM. the Contractor assumes responsibility for conformance with contract requirements. planning, sequencing of work. and determining construction means and methods. The administrative and procedural requirements for the CPM of scheduling and reporting progress of the work are detailed in this section. The principles and de?nitions of the terms used herein shalt be as set forth in the Associated General Contractors of America (AGO) publication The Use of CPM in Construction. copyright 197'6. 1. In the event of discrepancies. this section shall govern the development and utilization of the CPivischeduie. During the prebid conference. a review will be held as to how this section shall be implemented. and to receive any questions regarding the scheduling and reporting requirements. and the degrees of participation. cooperation. and compliance that shall be required of the Contractor. This section includes the following: Related Sections Quality assurance. Format. Schedules. Submittals. Review and evaluation. Updating schedules. Distribution. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Related sections include the following: 1. Section 01010 - Summary of Work: Work sequence. 2. Section 01300 - Submittals: Shop drawings. product data. and samples. 1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. The Contractor shall have the capability to comply with all 0PM requirements speci?ed herein with the Contractor's own staff. to retain a consultant capable of providing CPM scheduling services. including planning. evaluating. and reporting. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI CDC P2009453 01311-2 I Network Analysis Schedules B. The Contractor shall engage an independent CPM consultant. The consultant shall be skilled in the time and cost application of activity on arrow network techniques for construction projects. This consultant shall have no ?nancial or business ties to the Contractor. shall not be an af?liate or subsidiary company of the Contractor. and shall not be employed by an affiliate or subsidiary company of the Contractor. C. The consultant shall be a subjective specialist. acceptable to the Contracting Of?cer. who is expert in the CPM of scheduling and reperting. 1. The consultant shall have at least three years experience in scheduling construction work of a complexity comparable to this project, and having use of computer facilities capable of delivering a detailed graphic printout within 43 hours of request. 2. Prior to engaging a consultant. and within 10 days after receipt of the Notice to Proceed. the Contractor shall submit to the Contracting Of?cer the following: a. Name. address. and telephone number of the proposed consultant. b. Sufficient information to show the proposed consultant has the quali?cations to meet the requirements of this section. 0. A list of prior construction projects. along with selected activity on arrow network samples on current projects which the proposed consultant has successfully Performed. These network samples shall show complete project planning for a project of similar size. scope. and complexity as covered under this contract. 3. The Contracting Officer will review the submitted information and notify the Contractor within 10 days from receipt of information. If the proposed consultant is not acceptable to the Contracting Of?cer. the Contractor shall submit another consultant within 10 days for renewed consideration. a. The proposed CPM consultant must be approved prior to submitting any schedule. B. The Contractor shall demonstrate to the Contracting Of?cer. prior to the commencement of the work required under this section. that the Contractor has acquired the necessary personnel and resources to satisfy the performance requirements contained herein. Components of this expertise include. but are not limited to. the following: 1. Contractors Administrative Personnel: Three years minimum experience as a primary participant in the creation. updating. and maintenance of CPM scheduling. 2. Certi?cation. The Contractor shall certify to the Contracting Of?cer that the Contractor: a. has the computer equipment (hardware and software) required to produce the requirements of the CPM network diagrams required by this project: b. has computer facilities capable of delivering a detailed graphic printout within 43 hours of request; and c. has performed at least three similar scheduling functions on comparable size projects. evaluated by building type. complexity. construction value. and square footage within the last five years. 3. A close working relationship shall be maintained between the Contractor and the independent CPM consultant throughout the project to assure the CPM is maintained as an accurate. effective, and up to date tool for the Contractor's use. C. System. The Contractor shall submit for review and approval a description of the type and capabilities of the computerized network system proposed to be used. The Contractor shall use a computer software program for network analysis that has been developed speci?cally to manage CPM construction schedules and is acceptable to the Contracting Of?cer, Submission shall be within three calendar days of the date of receipt of the Notice to Proceed. 1.4 DEFINITIONS SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFJED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 01311-3 mad: I Hyatt: . I Network Analysis Schedules 262th A. De?nitions for terms used in this section include the following: 1. Critical Path Method (CPM). A construction scheduling technique using network analysis diagrams to plan and organize construction activities in an orderly manner along the critical path. 2. Network. A network diagram is a graphic representation showing the relationship of activities and events in the correct sequences required to complete the project within the contract time. 3. ragnet. A sequence of new activities andfor activity revisions that are proposed to be added I to the existing schedule to demonstrate the in?uence of delay and the method for I incorporating delays and impacts into the schedule as they are encountered. 4. Activity. Any single identifiable step in the project. It depends upon and cannot begin until completion of all preceding activities. 5. Critical activities. Those activities with no (zero) float time and are, therefore. operations that determine the critical path and control project completion. 8. Event. An event is the starting or ending point of an activity and occurs only when all preceding activities have been completed. Float time. The amount of time available for a given activity in excess of its established duration. It represents the amount of leeway available in scheduling an activity. a. Float time shall not be for the exclusive use of either the Government or the Contractor. Use shall be granted by the Contracting Of?cer to the entity who ?rst requires it. Concurrent need shall be prorated between the Government and the Contractori as determined by the Contracting Officer. b. Claims for delay or extensions of time involving non-critical activities [activities with positive float) which become critical. will be evaluated by the Contracting Officer to determine whether or not additional time will be granted to the Contractor or whether the Contractor shall be responsible to regain the lost timeI at no additional cost to the Government, by modifying the schedule of Work. 8. Weather delays. The time for performance of this contract includes an allowance for calendar days which, according to the averages of the most recent available 30-year period from 1971- 2000 may not be suitable for construction work. These averages may be obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NCAA). The mean number of days per month with inclement weather at Atlanta Airport shall serve as the anticipated number of days of inclement weather the Contractor shall provide in the scheduling of work and the preparation of the construction progress schedules. The mean number of days per month shall be prorated for portions of the month the Contractor has exterior worI-t actively ongoing and may be affected by inclement weather. a. The anticipated inclement weather days by month for Atlanta are as follows: January: 12 May: 10 September: 8 February: 10 June: 10 October: 6 March: 11 July: 12 November: 9 April: 8 August 10 December: 10 b. Weather delay days shall be resolved at the end of the project. The number of inclement weather days shall be the sUm of all properly recorded inclement weather days experienced during the period of time before the building is dried in. Whether there are more or less inclement weather days than anticipated is found by the difference in the sum of actual number of days and the sum of anticipated inclement weather days during the same months. c. If there are fewer inclement weather days than anticipated during the course of the project prior to being dried in. the Government has the right to offset any Contractor extension of time claims with the number of inclement weather days gained by the Contractor. BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) CDC P2009453 I (bit3}:42 uses 252301} SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION 0131 14 Network Analysis Schedules d. If there are more inclement weather days than anticipated during the course of the project prior to being dried in. the Contractor has the right to request an extension of time or use the days to offset any reductions in the contract schedule based on contract modi?cations or other reasons. 1.5 CPM SCHEDULES FORMAT A. Components shall include the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. Listings: Reading from left to right. in ascending order for each activity. Identify each activity with the applicable speci?cation section number. Each activity shall be cost loaded and shall directly relate to each pay application and to the schedule of values. Submittals shall not be cost loaded. Diagram Sheet Size: Minimum size 600 mm high 900 mm wide. Scale and Spacing: To allow for notations and revisions. 1.6 BASIC CPM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS A. The Contractor shall provide the Contracting Officer with a licensed programmed copy of the scheduling software. It shall be complete with instructions. information. and documentation. General: The Contractor shall provide the following activities: 1. 2. Proceed with preparation of the network diagram immediately following receipt of the Notice to Proceed. Follow the steps necessary to complete the development of the network diagram in suf?cient time so that the CPM schedule is submitted to and reviewed by. the Contracting Of?cer within 10 days. is revised as necessary by the Contractor, and is accepted by the Contracting Of?cer for use no later than 45 days after the receipt of the Notice to Proceed. Establish procedures for monitoring and updating the CPM schedule and for reporting progress; coordinate procedures with progress meeting and payment request dates. Analysis Program: Capable of compiling monetary value of completed and partially completed activities. of accepting revised completion dates. and recomputation of all dates and floats. Preparation of Schedule: Show complete sequence of construction by activity. with dates for beginning and completion of each element of construction. The Contractor shall consider and include the following elements of the Construction Schedule as a minimum: a. All activities involved in the project including every activity having a bearing on the time required to complete the work. b. Illustrate order and interdependence of activities and sequence of work; how start of a given activity depends on completion of preceding activities. and how completion of the activity may affect start of subsequent activities. c. Illustrate complete sequence of construction by activity. identifying work of separate floors or areas as appropriate. Provide dates for submittals. including those for Government furnished items. and return of submittals; dates for procurement and delivery of critical products: and dates for installation and provision for testing. Provide legend for symbols and abbreviations used. d. Activity durations shall not exceed 15 calendar days each in length. except that non- construction activities (such as procurement of materials. delivery of materials or equipment. or the curing of concrete). e. Required staf?ng by discipline. and by staff units (number of personnel to accomplish activity within scheduled duration). f. All work items involving submittals. materials and installation shall not be included in the SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED CDC P2009453 [Emil?'13 LIE I: 2:32am. 8. 9. 10. 1?1. .. .HVAC..MUDIEICATIONS -- SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEIU) 01311-5 Network Analysis Schedules same activity. There shall be separate activities for submittal, material, and installation. g. The estimated time duration. sequence requirements, and relationships of each activity in relation to other activities. h. For each activity show cost allocations based on the acceptable schedule of values. Schedule all activities to conform to work sequence as required by the Government in the Contract Documents. Activity durations shall not exceed 15 calendar days each in length, except that non- construction activities (such as procurement of materials, delivery of materials or equipment. or the curing of coherete). Work items involving submittals. materials and installation shall be separate activities. Failure to include any item in the schedule shall not excuse the Contractor from completing all work required within the applicable completion date. Relate the schedule to the entire project at the time of submission of the schedule and provide for the expeditious and practical execution of the Work. The cast shall be capable of providing the following minimum on?site services: Network analysis by or precedence notation. Progress and cost reports. Network comparisons, super and sub-networks. Resource reporting. Report writer allowing flexible formatting and summarization. Graphical output. ceases? C. Activity Requirements; The computerized system shall be capable of tabulating, as a minimum, for each activity the following: 1. Identifying activity number (Precedence System] or numbers Activity description. Duration in work days. In calculating activity duration, Saturdays, Sundays, holidays, and normal inclement weather shall be included. Activity code(s) relating to party responsible to perform work. Cost, personnel, and labor hours. Schedule and actualfremaining durations for each activity. Earliest start date by calendar date. Earliest finish date by calendar date. Actual start date by calendar date. . Actual finish date by calendar date. . Latest start date by calendar date. . Latest finish date by calendar date. - Float in work days. . Monetary value of each activity. . Percentage of activity completed. 16. D. The following computer outputs shall be required as part of the initial schedule submission and each update thereafter: Contractor's earnings based on the reported portion of activity completed. Activity sort by preceding event number from lowest to highest and then in the order of the following event number. These outputs shall show all activities, including restraints for the duration of the project. Activity sort by the amount of total float, then in order of preceding event number. These outputs shall show all activities, including restraints for the duration of the project. Activity sort by early start for the next 60 days, then in order of preceding event number. Activity sort by late ?nish for the next 60 days, then in order of preceding event number. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SELF) [bjf3ji42 262al?hl SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEW) coo 92009453 01311-8 I Network Analysis Schedules 5. Activity by organizational (?rm doing work) responsibility. E. The CPM system shall be capable of bi-weekly update and production of physical update reports. percent complete reports. and cost reports for payment purposes. The Contractor shall be responsible to analyze factors delaying progress and altering logic and durations on an interactive up to date basis. Access to the system for input and output shall be by terminals located at the construction site. The Contractor shall provide a suitable area and furniture to support system installation including all equipment. paper. and computer time. and further specific requirements of the Contractor's chosen system. 1.7 DETAILED CPM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS A. General: The CPM system shall consist of diagrams and accompanying mathematical analysis. Flexibility of formatting and summarization of reports shall be provided by selecting and prioritizing from the components listed in Article 1.6. Paragraph of this section. Indicate estimated dates and durations for the following: Preparation and processing of submittals. Purchase. fabrication. and delivery of critical or major elements of work. Installation of all elements of won-t. Milestone dates of the separate areas andfor ?oors of the project. Receipt of Government furnished and Contractor installed ?xtures. furnishings, equipment. or accessories. Installation of Government furnished and Government installed fixtures. furnishings. equipment. or accessories. All work activities affecting areas in. or adjacent to the project area. These include. but are not limited to. the following: Relocation of occupants. Interruption of services and utilities. Anticipated schedule of heavy equipment usage. Excessive noise levels. Interruption of access. pedestrian and vehicular. Working in areas after normal hours. Security clearance into work areas. Security interference. i.e. removal of fencing sections. I Delivery of equipment. ate-near: . Mathematical Analysis: Tabulate each activity of detailed network diagrams. using calendar dates. and identify for each activity: Preceding and following event numbers. Activity description. Estimated duration of activity. in maximum 15 day intervals. Earliest start date. Earliest ?nish date. Actual start date. Actual ?nish date. Latest start date. . Latest ?nish date. 10. Total and free float. 11. Monetary value of activity. keyed to Schedule of Values. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 01311-7 use i HYEIQMQDIFICATIONS FOR-I . . Network Analysis schedules 12. Percentage of activity completed. 13. Responsibility. Contractor or agent. 1.8 COMPONENTS OF THE CPM A. General. 1. The major components of the CPM are as follows: a. Preliminary Network Diagram. in. Detailed CPM Project Schedule. c. Master Summary Schedule. Staffing Requirements Forecast. 2. The Master Summary Schedule and Staffing Requirements Forecast are sub-networks of the Detailed CPM Project Schedule. lWhen there is a requirement to revise or update the Detailed CPM Project Schedule. the same requirements shall apply to the Master Summary Schedule and the Staf?ng Requirements Forecast. B. Preliminary Network Diagram. 1. Within 10 days of the receipt of the Notice to Proceed. the Contractor shall submit a preliminary network diagram outlining the activities for the first 30 days of construction. The preliminary network diagram shall include a skeleton diagram for the remainder of the work. 2. The preliminary network diagram shall. at a "minimum. prdvide the following: a. Each signi?cant construction activity. coordinated each activity in the schedule with other activities. and scheduled in its proper sequence. b. All individual activities within the first 90 days of construction that affect the daily operation of the Government on the campus of this project. including but not limited to the following: 1. Planned utility outages. 2. Temporary road closings. 3. Parkinginterruptions. 4. Security interferences. i.e. removal of fencing section. 5. Arrival and unloading of major items of equipment. c. All submittals required in the first 90 days 'of construction. arranged by the Contractor?s priority for review. d. All other submittals required to maintain orderly progress of the work. and submittals requiring eariy review because of long lead time for manufacture andfor fabrication shall also be listed. by Contractor?s priority. for review. 3. The Contractor shall submit six copies of the preliminary schedule to the Contracting Officer for review. C. Detailed 0PM Project Schedule. The Detailed CPM Project Schedule shall be constructed to show the order in which the Contractor proposes to carry out the work. to indicate the restrictions of access. the availability of work areas. and the availability and use of staff. materials. and equipment. It shall provide sufficient detail and clarity of form and technique so that the Contractor can plan. schedule. monitor. control. and report on the progress of the work. Further, it shall provide the Contracting Officer with a tool to monitor and follow the progress of the project. The Detailed 0PM Project Schedule shall comply with the various limits imposed hylhe scope of work and by any contractually speci?ed intem'iediate milestone and completion dates. 1. The following criteria shall form the basis for assembly of the logic: a. What activity must be completed before a subsequent activity can be started? b. What activities can be done concurrently? What activity must be started immediately following a completed activity? SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI CDC P2009453 01311?8 U-S-C- .. I AnalySis cl. What major economic facility or staf?ng restrictions are required for resequencing these activities? 2. The degree of detail shall be to the satisfaction of the Contracting Officer but the following factors shall have a bearing on the required depth of activity detail: The physical and structural breakdown of the project. The contract milestones and completion dates. The type of work to be performed and the labor trades involved. All purchase, manufacture. and delivery activities for all major materials and equipment. Deliveries of Government furnished equipment andfor materials. Preparation. submittal. and approval of shop andfor working drawings. coordination drawings and documents. and material samples. Approvals. required by regulatory agencies or other third parties. Plans for all subcontract work. Assignment of responsibility for performing speci?c activities. Access to and availability of work areas. Identi?cation of interfaces and dependencies with preceding. concurrent. and follow-on contractors. I. Actual tests. submission of test reports. and approval of test results. m. Planning for phased or total occupancy by the Government. n. Identification of any staf?ng, material. or equipment restrictions. 3. The activities included in the Detailed CPM Project Schedule shall be analyzed in detail to determine activity time duration in units of calendar days. Duration shall be based on the labor. equipment. and materials required to perform each activity on a normal work day basis. a. The only durations allowed over 15 days shall be those of nonconstruction activities. such as procurement of materials. concrete curing. and delivery of equipment. b. All durations shall be the result of de?nitive staffing and resource planning by the Contractor to perform the work in consideration of contractually defined on site work conditions. c. The staf?ng to be assigned. by craft de?nition. shall be shown on each construction activity of the CPM. No more than one craft shall be assigned to a speci?c activity. 4. The Contractor may use staf?ng or equipment restraints. separately noted. to optimize and level staf?ng and equipment requirements. The individual activities involved may be sequenced within the limits of the available total ?oat. a. If this technique is used in establishing the initial schedule. it shall be reflected in the logic with restraints identi?ed as "restraint - for staf?ng or equipment leveling purposes only". Critical or near critical paths resulting from the use of staffing restraints shall be kept to a minimum. Near critical paths shall be de?ned as these paths having 7 days or less of total float at the time of initial submission. 5. A unique event numbering system shall be required to code or identify activities by bid items. work items. areas. procurement. or similar function. No two activities shall have the same event number for identi?cation. 6. The estimated cost to perform each work activity shall be noted graphically on each activity included in the network. The sum of the costs assigned to all activities shall equal the contract value. a. No activity costs shall be assigned to manufacture. submission. and delivery activities. 7. The network shall clearly indicate all contract milestones and completion dates. All networks shall be drafted to show a continuous flow of information from left to right with no arrows from right to left. a. The primary path of criticaiity shall be clearly and graphically identi?ed on the network. Each network drawing shall have a standard grid coordinate system with alpha designation on the axis (top to bottom} and numerical designations on the axis (left to ?nance is? are SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITNE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) . coc P2009453 . 01311-9 attain. . I Network Analysis Schedules right) for quick activity reference and for following the planned sequence when using multi-sheet networks. b. Logic ties which cannot be graphically demonstrated as continuous restraints between different segments of the network shall be identi?ed as remote dummies. and shall be referenced as "to or from event number ms. page number yy". followed by appropriate alpha. numeric grid references, or equivalent designation. 8. The status of work in progress. as part of each update submission, shall be similarly identi?ed and the reported percent complete graphically indicated on each activity remaining in progress as of the last report period. D. Master Summary Schedule. The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the Contracting Officer a I time scale Master Summary Schedute that shows the total project in approximately 20 to 50 activities. This schedule shall accurately summarize the computerized Detailed 0PM Project Schedule and shall have common events for correlating the two levels of schedule indenture. 1. Emphasis shall be placed on major milestones and key dependencies among the various parties involved. 2. The Master Summary Schedule shall be updated to coincide with the pay application. E. Staf?ng Requirements Forecast. The Contractor shall prepare a staf?ng analysis in the form of a series of graphic displays depicting staffing by principal trades in the aggregate. and in accordance with the Detailed CPM Project Schedule. The graphs shall display the number of personnel days of effort. for each month. over the life of the project. This submission shall be computerized and be correlated with the staffing assigned to each activity of the Detailed CPM Project Schedule. 1. The Staffing Requirements Forecast shall be Updated and shall include the staf?ng actually used by trade as of the current report period and the staffing required to complete all remaining contract work. 1.9 BUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW A. The summary schedule for the submittals is as follows: 1. Within the speci?ed number of days after the Notice to Proceed. submit proposed Preliminary Network Diagram de?ning planned operations for the specified length of time. with a skeleton outline for remainder of Work. 2. Within 20 days after Contracting Officer has accepted the Preliminary Network Diagram. submit drafts of the following to the Contracting Officer for review and acceptance: a. Detailed Project Schedule. b. Master Summary Schedule. c. Staf?ng Requirements Forecast. 3. include written certi?cation that all agents of the Contractor. including but not limited to subcontractors. suppliers. and manufacturers. with responsibility for more than 5% of the signed contract face value have reviewed and concurwith the proposed schedules. 4. Submit one reproducible transparency and three opaque reproductions required by the Contracting Of?cer in addition to the copies required by the Contractor. 5. With each application for payment. submit electronic data ?les in 3?2" diskette form reflecting the status of each month's progress as agreed to during the progress review of the Contractor?s Application for Payment. 1.1DREVIEW. EVALUATION. AND ACCEPTANCE PROCESS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) (mm cm P2009453 01311-10 262alhi I Network Analysis Schedules A. The Contracting Of?cer shall accept or not accept. with written comments, the Contractor's submission within 15 calendar days after receipt of all required information for that submission B. At the request of the Contracting Officer. the Contractor shall participate in any meetings necessary to jointly review and evaluate the diagrams and logic and to reach mutual agreement and acceptance of each submission. C. If any of the required submissions are returned to the Contractor for revisions or corrections. they shall be revised and resubmitted for acceptance within 10 calendar days after receipt from the Contracting Of?cer. 1 Review and response by the Contracting Officer shall be given within 10 calendar days after receipt of each revised submission. 1.11 UPDATING SCHEDULES A. The initial update shall take place during the first week after the acceptance by the Contracting Officer of the Contractor?s Detailed CPM Project Schedule. Subsequent updates shall be scheduled at a time acceptable to both the Contracting Of?cer and Contractor prior to each month's application for payment. thereafter for the duration of the contract. B. The Detailed CPM Project Schedule shall be reviewed by the Contractor and Contracting Of?cer for the purpose of verifying the following: Actual start dates. Actual completion dates. Cost value of work reported in place. Activity percent completion. Revised logic. as built and projected, and changes in activity durations, cost. and manpower assigned. influence of contract modifications. incorporation of approved time extensions. weave 74.03 C. The Contractor shall come to the updating meetings with the above data prepared in advance for each meeting to provide. as of the end of the updating period. a complete and accurate report of the current procurement and construction progress and a depiction of how the Contractor plans to contin us the work of this project and to meet all contract completion dates, 1. All network revisions and status data agreed to during each update shall be considered as acceptable by the Contractor and Contracting Of?cer unless written noti?cation of any exception is given by an objecting party within 10 calendar days after receipt of the Contractor's update submission. 2. For major network revisions that cannot be agreed to during an updating meeting. the Contractor shall submit. in writing. such revisions for the Contracting Of?cer's acceptance priorto inserting such revisions into the network. 3. Submissions may be in the form of marked up networks. fragnets. or schedule abstracts. D. As part of the updating process. the Contractor shall prepare a Narrative Progress Report describing the physical progress during the report period. actions planned to correct any negative ?oat predictions, identifying activities modi?ed since previous submittal. and an explanation of potential delays andfor issues and their estimated impact on performance and the overall project completion date. Additionally. alternatives for possible schedule recovery to mitigate any potential delay andror cost increases should be included for consideration by Contracting Of?cer. SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION {SBui SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEIU) CDC P2009453 01311?11 nun-s 42 use a Hypo -- Network Analysis Schedules E. The required number of copies of all reports shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer within five calendar days after each updating meeting. F. If the Contractorfails to timely submit any of the update deliverables. the Contracting Officer may withhold approval of progress payments. or a portion thereof. until such time as the Contractor submits the required update reports. 1.12CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS A. When modi?cations or delays are experienced by the Contractor and the Contractor requests an extension of time. the Contractor shall submit to the Contracting Of?cer a written Time Impact Analysis (TIA) illustrating the influence of each modification or delay on the current contract schedule completion date. Each TIA shall include a fragnet demonstrating how the Contractor proposes to incorporate the modification or delay into the Detailed CPM Project Schedule. 1. Each analysis shall demonstrate the estimated time impact based on the events of delay. the date the modi?cation was given to the Contractor. the status of construction at point in time. and the event time computation of all activities affected by the modi?cation or delay. 2. The event times used in the analysis shall be those included in the latest update of the Detailed CPM Project Schedule or as adjusted forthe events of delay. 3. Time extensions shall be granted only to the extent that equitable time adjustments for the activity or activities affected abrceed the total or remaining float along the path of activities at the time of actual delay or at the time notice to proceed was issued for a modification. Each TIA shall be submitted in triplicate and within the period defined in the FARS after a delay occurs or notice to proceed with a modification is given to the Contractor. a. When the Contractor does not submit a TIA for a speci?c modi?cation or delay within the specified period of time. it shall be deemed to have waived its rights to any additional time and cost. There shall be no exceptions to this unless deemed in the Government's interest by the Contracting Of?cer. B. Approval or rejection of each TIA by the Contracting Officer shall be made within 15 calendar days after receipt of each complete TIA. unless subsequent meetings and negotiations are required. Upon approval. a copy of the TIA signed by the Contracting Of?cer shall be returned to the Contractor for incorporation into all appropriate schedules. 1. Upon mutual agreement. fragnets illustrating the influence of modi?cations and delays shall be incorporated into the Detailed CPM Project Schedule during the ?rst update after the modification is executed. 2. In the event the Contractor does not agree with the decision of the Contracting Officer regarding the impact of the modification or delay. it shall be resolved in accordance with the Disputes Clause of the contract. 1 .13DISTRIEUTION A. The Contractor shalI. following joint review. distribute copies of updated schedules to Contractor's project site file. Contracting Of?cer. subcontractors. suppliers. and other parties as required. B. The Contractor shall instruct recipients to report. in writing. problems anticipated by projections shown in schedules. PART 2 PRODUCTS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SE-U) CDC P2009453 01311-12 Network AnaIysiS Schedmes Not Used. PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION [Ill-[3 USE coc P2009453 . Hues MODIFICATIONS Foe .. I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION Section {11351-1 Sustainable Project Requirements SECTION 01351 SUSTAINABLE PROJECT REQUIREMENTS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 1.2 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Sustainable project goals. 2. Sustainable product requirements. SUSTAINABLE PROJECT GOALS A. Comply with the following general sustainable Project goals. Refer to speci?c specification sections for more detailed requirements. Use resources efficienth Reuse existing buildings and materials. Furnish materials that use resources ef?ciently. Use construction practices that achieve ef?cient use of resources and materials. Recycle or reuse job site waste. Furnish recycled content materials. Furnish materials that can be recycled. Avoid scarce, irreplaceable, or endangered resources: Furnish materials from abundant. well managed resources. 2. Furnish materials that are replaceable, renewable, or can be replenished. 3. Furnish materials that minimize damage to natural habitats. Use durable materials: 1. Furnish materials with longest usable life. 2 Furnish materials that can be reused. 3 Furnish materials with least maintenance requirements. Create spaces that are healthy for occupants: 1. Furnish low toxic products and materials. 2 Furnish materials without toxic maintenance requirements. 3 Furnish mechanical equipment that provides fresh air and does not trap water or pollutants. Use energy efficiently: 1. Furnish materials with low embodied energy. 2. Furnish materials that save energy during building operations. Use water efficiently: 1. Use construction practices that use water efficiently. 2. Furnish water conserving appliances and equipment. 3. Landscape Project site"for water conservation. 4. Capture and utilize rainwater. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) - BUILDING INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section 91351-2 I Sustainame Project Requirements H. Furnish materials that generate least amount of pollution. l. Protect and restore natural habitats on site. 1.3 A. Product Data: 1. Submit data for fitter media and ?lter ef?ciency. B. Manufacturer?s Certi?cate: Certify products meet or exceed speci?ed requirements. Certify roof surface materials are Energy Star labeled. 2. Certify salvaged or reused Products source and origin. 3. Certify recycled material content for recycled content products. a. Indicate postconsumer recycled content percent by weight. b. Indicate post-industrial recycled content percent by weight. 4. Certify source for local and regional materials. a. Indicate manufacturing or fabrication location and distance to site in miles. 5. Certify lumber is harvested from Forest Stewardship Council Certi?ed well managed forest. a. Indicate certifying agency and agency accreditation by Forest Stewardship Council. b. include chain-of-custody documentation tracking wood product from forest to installed Product. 6. Certify volatile organic compound content for each interior adhesive and sealant and related primer. a. include data sheet indicating volatile organic compound content for each Product. b. Include Material Safety Data Sheet for each Product. Certify volatile organic compound content for each interior paint and coating, 3. Include data sheet indicating volatile organic compound and chemical component content for each Product. b. Include Material Safety Data Sheet for each Product. 8. Certify each composite wood and agri?ber product contains no added urea- fon'naldehyde resins. a. Include data sheet indicating urea-formaldehyde resin content for each Product. C. Cost Data: 1. Submit cost of Products. excluding cost of labor and equipment for installation, for the following Products installed as part of permanent construction: a. Salvaged or reused. b. Recycled material content. c. Local or regional. d. Certified wood. Construction Plans: 1. Construction Waste Management Plan: Indicate analysis of estimated job site waste to be generated. including types and quantities: and proposed alternatives to use of landfill. a. Submit reports of actual recycling rates. salvage rates. and land?ll rates. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED 1NFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ BUILDING INFORMATION a CDC P2009453 . Section 01351-3 :a'z'am' HVACMODIFICATIONS FOR I Sustainable Project Requirements - 2. Construction indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Plan: Indicate absorptive material and HVAC system protection; source control; pathway interruption: housekeeping and construction sequencing. 1.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Exceed minimum energy efficiency and performance in accordance with ASHRAE 90.1 or local energy code whichever is more stringent. B. Perform Work without use of CFC based refrigerants in HVAC building systems. 0. Perform ventilation Work in accordance with ASHRAE 62. D. Develop and implement construction indoor air quality management plan including the following: Comply with minimum requirements of SMACNA IAQ. 2. Protect stored and installed absorptive materials from moisture damage. a. Store materials on elevated platforms under cover. and in dry location. b. When materials are not stored in enclosed location. cover tops and sides of material with secured waterproof sheeting. 3. Protect HVAC equipment during construction. a. Shut down return-side of HVAC system whenever possible during heavy construction or demolition. b. When HVAC system are operated during heavy construction. furnish disposable temporary filters. 4. Replace filtration media immediater before occupancy. 5. Conduct minimum two-week building flush-out with new filtration media at 100 percent outside air after construction ends and before occupancy. 1.5 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS A. Limit site disturbance to the following areas: 1. 20 feet beyond building perimeter. B. Recycle or salvage minimum of 50 percent by weight of construction. and demolition waste. PART 2 PRODUCTS 21 PROHIBITED MATERIALS A. Do not use materials containing asbestos. biphenyls or other hazardous materials. B. Do not use HCFC based refrigerants or Halon extinguishing agents. C. Do not use materials containing butyl for interior locations. I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEU) - BUILDING INFORMATION (0)8}242 262a[h} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) - BUILDING INFORMATION 2.3 2.4 2.5 CDC P2009453 . Section 01351-4 2.2 HVAC FILTERS A. Temporary Filters: ASHRAE 52.2 minimum efficiency reporting value of 13. RECYCLED CONTENT MATERIALS A. Furnish the following materials with minimum recycled content: Material Minimum Recycled Content (Percent) Post Consumer Post Industrial Concrete reinforcement Section 04810 50 Standard Metal Frames Section 03115 50 Metal Wall Guards - Section 10260 25 Metal Ductwork Section 15810 25 LOCAL AND REGIONAL MATERIALS A. Furnish the following materials manufactured and extracted, harvested, or recovered within 500 miles of Project site. 1. Mortar and Masonry Grout: Refer to Section 04065. 2. Unit Masonry: Referto Section 04810. 3. Steel Door Frames: Refer to Section 08115. 4. Ductwork: Refer to Section 15810. LOW EMITTING MATERIALS - INDOOR APPLICATIONS A. Adhesives and Adhesive Primers: Maximum volatile organic compound content in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 1168. Sealants Used as Fillers and Sealant Primers: Maximum volatile organic compound content in accordance with BAAQMD Regulation 8. Rule 51. Paints: Maximum volatile organic compound content in accordance with Composite Wood and Agrifiber Products: Contain no added urea-formaldehyde resins. PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION - BUILDING INFORMATION that? 42' US I: 253th CDC P2009453 ITIVACMODIFICATIONS-F-OR -- SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 01400-1 Qualityr Control Procedures SECTION 01400 QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1.2 B. C. General quality control activities. 2. Procedures for the following: a. Preparation and maintenance of schedule of quality control activities. b. Testing and evaluation of test results. c. Inspections. d. Construction and evaluation of mock-Ups. 3. Procedures for quality control activities performed by: Public authorities having jurisdiction. Contracting Of?cer. Independent testing agencies. d. Contractor. i? Manufacturers' representatives. 4. rocedures for submittal of quality control documentation. Quality control activities required are speci?ed in other sections. The cost of quality control activities speci?ed to be paid for by the Government is not to be included in the contract sum. CONTRACT CONDITIONS When portions of the work are required by the contract documents or by governing authorities to be tested. inspected. or approved. such tests. inspections. and approvals shall be made at the appropriate time. Unless othenvise indicated. all tests. inspections. and approvals shall be made by an independent testing agency. the appropriate public authority. or other entityr acceptable to the Government. Unless otherwise specified. the Contractor shall arrange for all tests. inspections. and approvals to be made and shall pay costs of all tests. Inspections. and approvals. including related costs due to such tests. inspections. and approvals. The Contractor shall notify the Contracting Of?cer of the time and place where tests and inspections are to be made so the Contracting Of?cer may have adequate time to arrange to observe such procedures. If the contract documents require that the Contracting Of?cer observe tests. inspections. or approvals. the Contracting Officer will do so at no additional cost to the Contractor. provided such tests. inspections. or approvals are to be conducted at the project site. The Government shall pay for tests. inspections. and approvals that become requirements after bids are received or negotiations concluded. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATJON CDC P2009453 Section 01400-2 Quality Control Procedures G. If the Contracting Officer gives the Contractor written to perform additional testing or inspection not already included in the contract documents. the Contractor shall arrange for such additional testing or inspection. The Government shall pay for such tests and inspections except as provided in the following paragraphs. H. If such additional procedures show that portions of the work do not comply with the contract documents. the Contractor shall pay all costs arising thereafter due to such noncompliance including those due to repeating such procedures as well as payment for the services and expenses of the Contracting Of?cer. I. Unless otherwise indicated. the Contractor shall obtain all certificates of testing. inspection. and approval and shall deliver them to the Contracting Of?cer. J. Independent testing agencies. whether employed by the Government or the Contractor. may not change the requirements of the contract documents and may not approve any portion of the work. K. Employment of testing agencies. by the Contractor or the Government. shall not relieve the Contractor of his obligation to perform the work in accordance with the contract documents. 1.3 DEFINITIONS A. Certi?cate: A written statement that a portion of the work as accomplished or a particular product conforms to the requirements of the contract documents. I B. Installer: Any entity who performs a construction activity. whether an employee. subcontractor. or sub-subcontractor of the Contractor. C. Government?s Testing Agency: Any independent testing and inspection agency employed by the Government to perform certain quality control activities. 1.4 REFERENCE STANDARDS A. Reference Standards - General: 1. Comply with edition of standard indicated. 2. Compliance with standards. which are revised or reissued after that date will not be required unless incorporated into the contract documents by modification. 3. Where applicable codes. laws. or regulations require editions of different dates. obtain instructions from the governing authorities as to which edition is required. B. The requirements of reference standards are binding on the Contractor. just as if they were cooled into the contract documents. but no provisions of reference standards shall alter the contractual relationship of the parties to the contract. C. Keep at the site at least one copy of each reference standard specified which covers ?eld mixing. installation quality. or field quality control methods. 1.5 SUBMITTALS A. Schedule of Quality Control Activities: 1. Submit as part of the progress schedule. 2. Submit as part of the contractor?s construction schedule. 3. Revise as required by the Government. to coordinate with the Government's testing agency activities. 4. Distribute to: SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI CDC P2009453 FDR. . IJE Ci 1.6 some SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section {11400-3 Quality Control Procedures a. The Government. b. The Contracting Of?cer. c. Each entity performing work for which quality control activities are speci?ed. Reports: Provide certi?ed copies of reports. Unless otherwise indicated. submit for information only. . Submit reports not later than the date of application for payment for the work to which the quality control activity relates. Reports shall be prepared by the entity performing the quality control activity. Submit copies directly to governing authorities when so directed. When the Contractor employs an independent testing agency. submit copies directly to the Contracting Of?cer. Include the following information in all types of reports: a. Date of report. Project name {and number. if applicable). Description of the quality control activity. d. Name. address, and telephone number of entity performing activity. e. Data quality control activity was performed. 9 Emit-9? Nr? 93 Speci?cation section(s] involved. Basis for evaluation (test method. etc). . Results or conclusions. including evaluations and interpretations. i. Title, name. and signature of person performing activity. Include the following information in all test reports: a Locations from which samples ware taken. if any. b. Ambient conditions at time of activity. Recommendations for retesting. if any. Certi?cates: Submit for information only. unless otherwise indicated. 1. Certi?cates shall be signed by the product manufacturer. unless otherwise speci?ed or not applicable. 2. Include the following information: a. Date of certi?cate. b. Project name (and number. if applicable). c. Description of the product or system certi?ed. d. Specification section(s) involved. e. When actual materials to be used are to be certi?ed. include lot identi?cation markings. destination or shipment. and quantity in shipment. f. Title. name. and signature of person authorized to make certi?cation. Qualification Statements: Submit for information only. unless otherwise indicated. Manufacturers? Instructions: Submit for Information only. unless otherwise Indicated; identify conflicts with contract documents. QUALITY ASSURANCE Qualifications of Manufacturers: As indicated in individual sections. Qualifications of Installers: As indicated in individual sections. Quali?cations of Testing and Inspection Personnel: 1. As indicated in individual sections. Testing Equipment: Calibrated at reasonable intervals with devices of an accuracy traceable to either the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) standards or to accepted values of natural physical constants. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ - BUILDING INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section 01400-4 I Quality Comm. Procedures ibiiaiziza uses 262aih} 1.7 COORDINATION WITH OTHER ENTITIES A. Cooperate with other entities performing quality control activities. B. Provide samples of materials and design criteria as indicated and when requested. C. Provide other assistance. equipment, tools, and storage facilities as speci?ed. D. If desired. make arrangements with those entities and pay for additional similar or related testing or inspection required forthe Contractor?s use or convenience. 1.8 SEQUENCING AND SCHEDULING A. Prepare a schedule of quality control activities required. 1. include activities of the Government's testing agencies. 2. Provide the following information for each activity: Specification section number. Description of the activity. Identi?cation of test or inspection methods. Enumeration of results required. Number of tests required. Number and type of samples to be taken, if any. Starting time of activity. The date that the work will be ready for the Government's testing agency access. i. Elapsed time required for activity. j. Entity responsible. k. Special requirements for activity. area-secure B. Coordinate quality control activities to avoid delay and to make it unnecessary to uncover work for testing or inspection. C. Notify the Government's testing agencies 14 working days prior to commencement or completion of work. which is to be tested or inspected. whichever is applicable. PART 2 - PRODUCTS (NOT USED) PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 GENERAL A. Provide work of the specified quality; where quality level is not indicated, provide work of quality customary in similar types of work. 1. Where codes. laws. or regulations require work of higher quality or performance. provide work complying with those codes. laws. and regulations. 2. Where two or more quality provisions of the contract documents conflict. comply with the most stringent requirement: where requirements are different but apparently equal. and where it is uncertain which requirement is most stringent. obtain clari?cation from the Contracting Of?cer before proceeding. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 I 3.2 3.3 3.5 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION U) Section 01400-5 Quality Control Procedures 3. Actual quality may exceed the speci?ed quality; verify that such differences are acceptable to the Government (other criteria may make excessive quality undesirable). Control products. suppliers. manufacturers. site conditions. installers. and workmanship in such a manner as to produce work of the speci?ed quality. Comply with manufacturers' instructions and recommendations. 1. Keep a record of instructions and recommendations which supplement or con?ict with the manufacturer?s written instructions. 2. When manufacturers' instructions and recommendations conflict with the contract documents. obtain clarification. from the Contracting Of?cer before proceeding. Use installers who are capable of producing work of the specified quality. Perform all quality control activities specified unless indicated to be performed by other entities. MOCK-UPS Mock-Lips required are speci?ed in other sections. Construct mock-ups as specified for actual work. with all components required for a complete installation. Erect specified mock-ups in Iocationfs) approved by Contracting Officer. 1. Where mock-ups are to be removed. clear area after removal of mock-up and return to original condition. Where mock-ups are to be approved by the Contracting Officer. obtain approval of the Contracting Officer prior to proceeding with installation. Where mock-ups are to be tested for compliance. obtain satisfactory test results prior to proceeding with the work. TESTING Perform tests speci?ed. When results of tests are unsatisfactory. matte whatever changes or repairs are necessary and retest. Submit written report of each original test and of each retest. INSPECTING Perform inspections specified. When inspections reveal unsatisfactory work. make whatever changes or repairs are necessary and reinspect. Submit written report of each original inspection and each reinspection. PROTECTION AND REPAIR SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU CDC P2009453 Section 01400-6 I Quality Control Procedures uscg 262a[h] A. When work is uncovered during quality control activities. provide protection from damage. B. Correct work damaged by control activities; where repair is indicated as an unacceptable method. replace the work. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 .. FORI . I rot-I23. 42 U5 262th SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATIGN {ssu Section 01500-1 Temporary Facilities and Controls SECTION 01500 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS PART 1. GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. Temporary Utilities: Electricity, lighting, heating. ventilation. telephone service. waler, and sanitary facilities. 3. Temporary Controls: Dust control. noise and vibration control, pest control, protection of the Work, and security measures. C. Construction Facilities: Field of?ces and sheds. access roads, and parking. D. Removal of Utilities. Facilities. and Controls. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Related sections include the following: 1. Section 01' 010 - Summary of Work. 2. Section 01?00 - Contract Closeout. 1.3 TEMPORARY UTILITIES A. Electricity. Connect to existing power service. Power consumption shall not disrupt Government's need for continuous service. 2. Government will pay cost of energy used. Exercise measures to conserve energy. If electrical use appears excessive. the Government reserves the right to require the Contractor to provide separate power to be paid for by the Contractor. 3. If. upon inspection of the power characteristics, the Contractor ?nds that additional work is required for his use, then all necessary work shall be done by the Contractor and paid for by the Contractor. 4. Provide power outlets for construction operations, with branch wiring and distribution boxes located as determined by Contractor. Provide flexible power cords as required. 5. Provide main service disconnect and over current protection at convenient location. All temporary electrical services shall be GFCI protected, installed and paid for by the Contractor. 6. Permanent convenience receptacles may not be utilized during construction. Provide adequate distribution equipment. wiring, and outlets to provide single phase branch circuits for power and lighting. 3. Provide duplex outlets and circuits for power tools as determined by Contractor. 9. All costs associated with temporary power, unless noted above, shall be paid by Contractor. El. Lighting. 1. Provide and maintain lighting for construction operations as required by each activity and as required by safety standards, regulations. and recommendations. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION midi-42 CDC P2009453 Section 01500-2 252alhi I Temporary Facilities and Controls 2. Provide branch wiring from power source to distribution boxes with lighting conductors. 3. 4. 5 pigtails, and lamps as required. Provide phase branch circuits for lighting as installed by the Contractor based on governing Codes and regulations. Maintain lighting and provide routine repairs. Permanent building lighting may be utilized during construction. All costs associated with temporary lighting. unless noted above. shall be paid by Contractor. C. Heating and Cooling. 1. The Govemment?s existing heat or cooling sources may be utilized when readily available. Where resources are not available. provide temporary heat or cooling devices as needed to maintain specified conditions for construction operations. a. Government heat or cooling source may not be available at all times to maintain temperatures required for particular construction operations. Therefore. it remains the Contractor's responsibility to assure the temperature is maintained at the required level for the specified construction operation with supplemental heat or cooling source. When the Government?s existing heat or cooling source is used. the Government will pay the cost of energy used from its own source only. unless noted otherwise. Exercise measures to conserve energy. The new heat or cooling source in this project may not be utilized by the Contractor. All costs associated with temporary heating and cooling. unless noted above. shall be paid by Contractor. D. Ventilation. 1 2. 3. Ventilate enclosed areas to achieve curing of materials. to dissipate humidity. and to prevent accumulation of dust. fumes. vapors. or gases. The Contractor shall provide. service. and operate ventilation equipment as required to maintain clean air for construction operations. All costs associated with temporary ventilation. unless noted above. shall be paid by Contractor. E. Telephone Service. 1. Provide. maintain and pay for telephone service to ?eld of?ce at time of project mobilization. F. Water Service. 2. 3. Government will pay cost of water used. Exercise measures to conserve water. Extend branch piping with outlets located so water is available by hoses with threaded connections. Provide temporary pipe insulation to prevent freezing. All costs associated with temporary water service. unless noted above. shall be paid by Contractor. G. Sanitary Facilities. 1. Existing Government facilities shall not be used. The Contractor shall furnish and install temporary portable chemical toilet facilities for all construction personnel. Provide at time of project mobilization. Minimum number of units shall be as required by applicable codes and regulations. The Contractor shall maintain. service. and clean facilities as required by applicable codes and regulations and as required by the Contracting Of?cer. H. Government Equipment. Government equipment shall not be utilized during this project by the Contractor's staff. BUT UNCLASSIFIED (sou: coc P2009453 . I militia-12 US Cl 262mb: SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU Section 01500-3 Temporary Facilities and Controls subcontractors. agents. or suppliers. Equipment includes fax machines. copiers. and all otheroffice equipment and supplies. 1.4 TEMPORARY CONTROLS A. Dust Control. 1. Execute Work by methods to minimize raising dust from construction operations. 2. Provide and pay for positive means to prevent air-borne dust from dispersing'into atmosphere. Provide requirements of speci?c speci?cation sections where stated. Noise and Vibration Control. 1. Execute work by methods to minimize noise and vibrations from construction operations. This includes all scheduled work. All schedules shall be reviewed and approved by the Contracting Of?cer before such noise andfor vibration producing elements of work are performed. A minimum of 14 days notice to the Government is required before any such procedures may be executed, subject to approval by the Contracting Officer. 2. Refer to specific speci?cation sections for additional requirements. Pest Control. 1. Measures shall be taken. and paid by Contractor to insure the permanent removal during construction of all pests and rodents that may be discovered. due to. or attracted. because of construction activities of this contract. All such measures shall be in strict accordance with all applicable codes and the operating procedures. guidelines and requirements of CDC. Protection of installed Work. 1. Protect installed Work and provide special protection where specified in individual specification sections. 2. Provide temporary and removable protection for installed Products. Control activity in immediate work area to minimize damage. 3. Provide protective coverings at walls. projections. jambs. sills. and sot?ts of openings. 4. Protect ?nished ?oors. stairs. and other surfaces from traf?c. dirt. wear. damage. or movement of heavy objects. by protecting with durable sheet materials. Security. 1. The Contractor shall provide security fences. and other measures to protect Work. existing facilities. and Government's operations from unauthorized entry. vandalism. or theft. 2. If Contractor breaches or causes a change in any security device. barrier. or equipment. the Contractor shall return the security component to the same status before the end of the same work day. a. While the security component is not functioning or operating as intended. the Contractor shall provide at no additional cost to the Government temporary means to safeguard the area typically secured until the inoperable securityr component is restored to its intended capabilities. 3. Coordinate with Government's security program. 1.5 CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES A. Field Of?ces and Sheds. 1. Of?ce: Structurally sound. weather-tight. with raised floor. lighting. electrical outlets. heating and cooling equipment. and equipped with sturdy furniture and drawing display table. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (sou; SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (mist-42 CDC P2009453 - - 0159M 262st?) I Temporary Facilities and Controls Storage Sheds: As required. provide suitable sheds for storage of materials. At Contractor's option. mobile of?ces or portable buildings may be used for of?ces. Maintain throughout construction period. Fill and grade site for temporary structures to provide drainage. Install of?ces on fixed foundations. Provide steps. railings. and landings as required at entrance doors to of?ces. Provide continuous maintenance for temporary structures. services. and furnishings. Location of Offices and Sheds: Locate temporary structures to avoid interference with work. as approved by Contracting Of?cer. 9. Relocate temporary structures as required by progress of work. eaomaam B. Access Roads. 1. Provide and maintain access to fire hydrants. free of obstructions. 2 Construction traf?c may use only designated existing on-site roads. Load height. length. or other features may require entry into and from the campus by a particular route established by the Contracting Of?cer and CDC security upon noti?cation from the Contractor. 3. The Contractor shall provide a notice of request to the Contracting Of?cer at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled delivery. C. Parking. 1. Contractor's parking shall be as designated by Contracting Officer within the CDC campus. 1.6 REMOVAL OF UTILITIES. FACILITIES. AND CONTROLS A. Remove temporary above grade or buried utilities, equipment. facilities. and materials. prior to final inspection. B. Clean and repair damage caused by installation or use of temporary work. C. Restore existing facilities used during construction to original condition. Restore permanent facilities used during construction to specified condition. D. Landscaping: Plant landscape elements where damaged or destroyed by Contractor's execution of work. When replacing grass. plant mix of grass as determined by Contracting Of?cer to match existing adjacent grassed areas. 1. Plant landsceoe materials during recommended season only. 2. Maintain grass by mulching. watering. reseeding. and other methods until healthy and permanent stand of grass has occurred. 3. Plant and completely maintain other landscaping elements as recommended for the particular species. PARTS 2 and 3 Not Used END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) :13 U5 I: 3; 2:31am. CDC P2009453 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 01546-1 MODIFICATIONS FDR Health and Safety sec-non 0154s HEALTH AND SAFETY PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 APPLICABLE STANDARDS: A. Refer to the references to health and safety standards published in 41 CFR Part 50-204 which require Contractoncompliance with standards such as. but not limited to. the US. Department of Labor 29 CFR Part 1910 OSHA General industry Standards and Regulations or Part 1926 OSHA Construction Standards and Regulations. and applicable local codes and national consensus standards. Compliance with Regulations: Where there is a conflict between applicable regulations. the most stringent shall apply. Contamination or pollution of any natural (air. land. water) or cultural (historical and archaeological sites) resources is prohibited. Disposal of surplus or excess materials shall comply with Federal. State and local regulations and guidelines. Tobacco Free Environment. The use of tobacco products. including cigarettes, cigars. snuff. chewing tobacco. and all other tobacco products is prohibited on all CDC campuses. A verbal warning is given for the first offense by an individual. A repeat violation by the same individual shall be followed by a written warning from the Contracting Officer. A third violation by the same person shall result in removal of the person from the project. A. Abusive. discourteous. insulting. or threatening behavior toward those persons enforcing this policy shall not be tolerated and may result in removal ofthe individual regardless ofthe number of offenses. Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan. The Contractor shall not be allowed to commence work on site until the CHSP has been approved by the Contracting Of?cer. Refer to Article 1.4 COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN (CH5P) GUIDELINES for information and requirements. The OHS points of contact for initial project review and questions are Joe Feiton and Dwayne Lasky. They will coordinate requests and provide appropriate contacts or resources for specific issues and questions. 1.2 CDC HEALTH. SAFETY. AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS A. CDC Health and Safety Requirements. As a supplement to the requirements for health and safety issues listed in the P60 solicitation. the following required tasks with approximate time per new person to achieve each task (including travel} are listed. 1. Safety Survival Skills Training 2 hours 2. Each TB skin test trip to CDC 3 hours per visit 3. Baseline serum 3 hours Government Required Tests: All employees of the Contractor involved in work within a space de?ned as hazardous by the Government shall be required to provide a base line serum sample. No other immunizations are required forthis project by OHS. Tetanus is strongly advised for any construction project. The base line serum is the only test that CDC will provide at a CDC OHS Clinic. All other immunizations are the responsibility of the Contractor to coordinate and exec ute. SENS BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION (SBUJ coc P2009453 Section 01545-2 -- Health and Safety 1. Tetanus. A tetanus immunization is valid for 10 years. C. Government Provided Decontamination: As required by the presence of hazardous materials. the Government shall thoroughly decontaminate the work area prior to commencement of any work by the Contractor in said space. D, Government Provided Security Devices: Security badges and card keys will be issued to the Contractor by CDC. as appropriate. and will be monitored by CDC's Physical Security Activity. Refer to Section 0154? Personnel Security Requirements for additional information. 1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Contractor Responsibility: The Contractor shall assume full responsibility and Iiabilityfor compliance with all applicable regulations pertaining to the health and safety of personnel during the execution of work. and shall hold the Government harmless for any action or lack of action by the Contractor or by any of the Contractor's employees or subcontractors, which results in illness, iniury or death. B. Project Speci?c Safety and Health Program. The Contractor shall establish and maintain a safety program to protect the safety of all workers on the construction worksite and identify by name and title the individual with overall responsibility to ensure implementation of health and safety requirements on-site. The Contractor?s safety program shall be outlined in a written Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan. The Government has outlined and included as an attachment to this document the CDC Contractor Guidelines for Preparing the Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan (cusp) to assist Contractors in preparing this submittal. The information included in the guidelines is not all inclusive and does not relieve the Contractor and its agents of their responsibility for the development and implementation of other applicable health and safety programs and training requrrements. andtor compliance with other regulations and standards set forth in OSHA's Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 1910. Occupational Safety and Health Standards. and Part 1925. Safety and Health for Constructmn. C. Copies of Required Documents. The Contractor shall have one up to date copy of each applicable and other required health and safety documentation on-site. This shall include. but not limited to. OSHA Standards for the industry. and 29 CFR 1910. 1.4 COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN GUIDELINES A. Comprehensive Plan: The Contractor shall provide to the Contracting Of?cer a written Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan (CHSP) for the speci?c wort: under this contract. The Contractor?s CHSP shall address all occupational safety and health requirements outlined in Table I. Safety and Health Policies. Administration and Management Structure of the CDC Contractor guidelines for Preparing the Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan. as well as speci?c hazard prevention and control measures taken to address the applicable safety requirements outlined in Table ill Hazard Prevention and Control Programs Construction Only). 1. The Contractor's CH SP shall cover all aspects of onesite construction operations and activities associated with work of this contract. The Contractor. as speci?ed in Table I. shall concoct a Construction Phase Hazard Analysis to identify and address all potential hazards and required safety training necessary to protect Contractor or subcontractor employees. visitors and the public. as well as prevent unnecessary work interruptions due to damage to property. materials. supplies. and equipment. 2. The purpose of the CHSP is to ensure compliance by the Contractor and subcontractors with all applicable environmental. health and safety regulations and any project speci?c requirements SENSITIVE our INFORMATION issul SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ ?1.342% CDC P2009453 Section 01546?3 seam. MODIFICATIONS FOR - Health and Safety specified by the Government. 3. All Contractor submittals shall address the information requested in Table I. 4. The information included in these tables is not all inclusive and does not relieve the Contractor and subcontractors of their responsibilities for the development and implementation of other applicable health and safety programs and training requirements, andlor compliance with other regulations and standards set forth in OSHA's Title 29 offhe Code of Federal Regulations f? CFR). Part 1910. Occupational Safety and Health Standards and Part 1926. Safety and Health for Consfnicflon. 5. The Contractor shall not be allowed to commence work on site until the CHSP has been approved by the Contracting Of?cer. B. Safety Training: The Contractor shall maintain on site and make available upon request to the Contracting Of?cer documentation that its employees have received the necessarytraining such as. but not limited to. applicable OSHA required safety and health training outlined in Table medical surveillance programs. personal protective and safety equipment, hazard recognition and protective measures. and manufacturer's product and material safety data sheets required for the work described by the Contract Documents. The training shall also include. but not be limited to. the following elements: 1. The nature of the environment of the work area and adjacent areas. Location of first aid stations. Location of telephones and emergency numbers. Program personnel and the area's protocol. Procedure to report unsafe conditions. Requirements to maintain clean and safe work area. Allowable work conditions and schedule. Observation of CDC physical security policies and procedures. In accordance with OSHA 29 CFR 1910.14? Control of Hazardous Energyiioclcouf Tagoul. CDC and the Contractor will inform each other of respective lockout or tagout procedures. 10. The Contractor shall ensure compliance with 29 CFR Safety Training and Education for employees entering confined spaces; 29 CFR 1926.35 Employee Emergency Action Plans; and 29 CFR 1926 Sub Part V. Power Transmission and Distribution. which outlines the standards for construction of electric transmission and distribution lines and equipment. Particular attention shall be paid to 29 CFR 1926.956 Underground Lines. which includes the requirements for confined space entry. C. Warnings: Warning signs shall be continuously and conspicuously placed to provide adequate warning of construction hazards to workers and the public. D. Work Area: Work with the CDC often takes place in a highly specialized environment. Employees of the Contractor may be within close proximity to sensitive. valuable and unique animals. specimens. experiments. or equipment. Employees of the Contractor shall. at all times. remain only in those areas designated for the execution of this Work. Failure to follow this protocol may endanger the employee and Government staff. animals or equipment. Said failure may be grounds to permanently remove the employee from the project Repeated violations may be grounds to remove the Contractor from the project. E. Meetings: The Contractor shall hold weekly safety meetings with all employees. These meetings shall include environmental. safety and health issues related to the Work. Written reports shall be provided to the Contracting Of?cer on the contents of each meeting. theattendees and a report of any safety inspections made that week by the Contractor. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Health and Safety F. Fire Prevention and Protection: The Contractor shall execute the fire prevention and protection plan submitted as part of the Comprehensive Plan. The following are elements of the plan. although the plan shall not be limited to the following: 1. Housekeeping. Good housekeeping. with provision for prompt removal and disposal of accumulations of combustible scrap and debris. shall be maintained in all areas of the jobsite. Approved self-closing metal containers shall be used for disposal of waste saturated with combustible and ?ammable liquids. 2. Codes and Regulations. The Contractor shall comply with the requirements published in the current revisions of the National Electrical Code. National Electrical Safety Code. and the National Fire Protection Association standards. 3. Fires. Fires and open ?ame devices shall not be left unattended unless protected with automatic temperature control and shutoff devices. 4. Cleaning and Degreasing. Gasoline and liquids with a ?ash point below 38E shall not be used for cleaning and degreasing. 5. Building Exits All buildings. shops and plant facilities in which employees are required to work shall have at least two well marked and lighted exits. The two exits shall be arranged to minimize the possibility of both exits being rendered inaccessible by a ?re or emergency condition. 6. Fire Extinguisher. marked ?re extinguisher rated atbzc or greater shall be suitably placed at locations and intervals as required by codes governing this work. 7' Hot Work Permits. As required by the work activities of this project. a mandatory meeting shall be held with the Contracting Of?cer and other interested parties to review the requirements of a Hot Work Permit. This permit is required for all welding. torch cutting. and other hazardous work activities. All Hot Work is to be inspected by the Of?ce of Health and Safety (OHS). Three working days prior to any Hot Work being done. the Contractor shall contact OHS Fire Protection Engineer. Mr. Robert Williams. by e?mail {Rwilliams1@cdc.gov) to schedule an inspection. If a timely response is not received. contact Mr. Williams by telephone at 404?439-1465 to schedule the inspection. a. The Contractor shall inform the Contracting Of?cer of the date and time of the inspection G. Hazardous Substances: Prior to bringing hazardous substances. as de?ned in 29 CFR 1910.1200. onto the project site. all Contractor employees involved shall be advised of material safety data sheet information and a copy of each hazardous substances MSDS shall be provided to the Contracting Of?cer. prior to delivery of hazardous substance. H. Emergency Numbers: Emergency telephone numbers and reporting instructions for ambulance. physician. hospital. ?re. police and National Response Center shall be conspicuously posted at the project site by the Contractor. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: Unless otherwise speci?ed. the Contractor is responsible for providing all necessary safety and personal protective equipment needed by its employees. This equipment shall meet appropriate OSHA. NIOSH and ANSI approval requirements and shall be in good working order. A. The Contractor shall confirm in writing. prior to commencement of the work. that its employees have received appropriate training on the use and maintenance of safety and personal protective equipment prior to its use. Failure to correctly use appropriate safety equipment is a violation ofthe contract and may result in default of the contract. 2.2 SENSITNE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INITORMATIDN (SBUJ coo P2009453 Section 01546-5 that? MODIFICATIONS coat. - -- I Health and Safety A. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent injury to the public. building occupants. or damage to property of others. For the purposes of this contract. the public or building occupants shall include all persons not employed by the Contractor or a subcontractor of this project. B. No corridor. aisle. stairway. door. orexit shall be obstructed or used in such a manner as to encroach upon routes of ingress or egress utilized by the public or building occupants. or to present unsafe or unhealthy condition to the public or building occupants. 1. Contractor ladders or other similar equipment necessary to perform the work shall not be left unattended at the work site. C. Powder actuated devices shall not be used in occupied buildings without prior written approval from the Contracting Officer. PARTS EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. Contractor shall examine work space prior to commencement of Work. Report any condition that may potentially affect proper execution of Work to the Contracting Of?cer. B. The Government will occupy the site throughout the construction period. Therefore. the activities of the Contractor may require modification from those activities anticipated under more normal construction conditions. The Contractorshali provide the necessary equipment and methods. base the schedule of the project on the known operational features of the work area. and adhere to the requirements of affected activities. Activities which may be affected by the specialized environment of this prolect include. but are not limited to. the following: 1. Minimize the creation of construction debris. vapors and airborne particulates. 2. Special protective equipment and apparatus that may be needed by employees of the Contractor. 3. Animal facility andror laboratory protocol relating to the safety and health of CDC personnel. animals and others. 4. Restricted work hours. Certain spaces may have speci?c periods oftime only during which work may be done. 5. Restricted access and egress. Due to normal operations by CDC of particular spaces where Work may be done. the movement of the Contractor's employees to. or within the Work area may be restricted during certain portions ofthe day. 6. Maintenance of life safety devices. The Contractor shall notify the Contracting Of?cer when any work activities may set off any existing life safety device 14 days prior to the scheduled work. if a device need sto be re moved from servicetemporarily. the Contractor shall providethe necessary personnel to patrol the area affected. and notify CDC security immediately if an emergency anses. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) 32303453 Section I Personnel Security Requirements SECTION 0154? PERSONNEL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS PART 1. PERSONNEL SECURITY PROCESS 1.1 De?nitions A. Security Process: The submission and review of employee information to the CDC for the evaluation of potential threats to CDC property andi'or personnel. The process requires the completion of several questionnaire forms by CDC. the Contractor. and employees. B. Foreign National: All persons that are not United States citizens. C. Contractor: The Contractor who signed the contract for the work being performed. The Contractor is also responsible for all subcontractors. agents. suppliers. manufacturers, and other that may need to access the project site as though each was an employee of the Contractor. 1.2 Contractor Exclusion A. A Contractor is not required to complete the personnel security process for an employee it the Contractor employee has a valid National Security Clearances (Secret or Top Secret) from another agency. The Personnel Security Processing Of?ce shall determine individual status based on analysis of documentation provided by the Contractoriemployee. 1. For specific questions pertaining to this situation. contact the Personnel Security Processing Of?ce at (770) 488-1332. B. All other Contractor employees shall complete the security process. 1.3 Security Process A. The security process consists of the following sequenced steps. 1. List of Employees from Contractor and the completionisubmission of the E-QIP Form by each employee. Contractor personnel input into the CDC Mainframe System. Completion of the CF 306 Declaration for Federal Employment). Completion of the CDC Safety Survival Skills Training. Completion of the CDC Security Awareness Course (as required). Completion of CDC Credential Request and Cardkey Forms. Completion of Appointment 1: Fingerprinting and SF 85 Initiation (Online). Completion of the SF 85 (Online). Completed by Contractor personnel. Completion of Appointment 2: Pick up of BadgefCardltey. B. List of Employees from Contractor. 1. Upon award of contract. the Contracting Of?cer will request from the Contractor a list of all employees who will work on the project. including the following information: Full Name (Last Name 1% Name Full Middle Name. as on Birth Certi?cate} Position Title Social Security Number Date of Birth noes SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) P2009453 Section 01547?2 $63.92;? us c: MODIFICATIONS I Personnel Security Requirements e. Place of Birth (City. State or CityICountry) f. Email Address 9. Telephone Number This information shall be provided to the CDC via the Electronic Questionnaire In- Processing Form Each Contractor employee shall complete and emaili'fax an form to the project's Contracting Of?cer A_t~iD to one of the two following Personnel Security Processing Of?ces: - Roybal Campus Personnel Security Processing Office: (404) 639-7349 cher Ctr. Personnel Security Processing Of?ce (Yaie Bldg): (WU) 488-1703 The Contractor may Fax to either Personnel Security Processing Of?ce. but it recommended that they Fax to the office closestimost convenient to the project site. 2. The Contractor shall identify all Foreign Nationals and Naturalized Citizens that will work on the project. a. The Contractor shall submit the E-QIP for all Foreign National or Naiuraiized Citizen employees at the same time all other E-OIPs are submitted. for Foreign National or Naturalized Citizen employees shall included the following additional information: 1) Authorization Type andr'or Category Type. Passport or VisafGreen-Card) 2} Authorization Number 3) Authorization Start Date 4) Authorization Expiration Date b. Upon receipt of the the Contract Of?cer or the Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative shall request visitor access to the CDC by entering basic employee and visit data into the Visitor Management System (VMS). Once the basic data has been entered into the VMS. the employee will receive an email from the requesting further. more detailed information. After the employee completes the VMS requirement, the request will be routed for multiple reviews and approvals. ultimately arriving at the Office of Security and Emergency Preparedness (OSEP) for ?nal approval. c. OSEP will review request. and issue ruling of approval. If request is not approved. the Foreign National or Naturalized Citizen shall not enter any CDC facility. if the request is approved. the employee will be fail in line with the badging process for US. Citizen Contractor employees. 3. The Contracting Of?cer andior the Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative will determine the length of time each employee will need to access CDC facilities. Employees that need to enter CDC facilities five cumulative business days or' less within a 90 day period. may be: a. Processed through the Visitors' Center at each campus. Monday - Friday AM 5:00 PM. and shall be; h. Escorted at ail times by a CDC-Badged Contractor employee while oniin any CDC 4. The Contractor shall provide a list (and E-OIP Forms) for each employee that wiII be onfin any CDC campusffacility more than five cumulative business days within a 90 day period to the Contracting Officer. a. Contractor shall provide all information listed in Article 1.3 Security Process. Paragraph B. items 1 2. b. Approximater two business days are required to enter the employee information into the CDC mainframe once the E-QIP is received. 5. Upon receipt of the List of Employeest-OIP Forms. CDC will perform the following tasks: a. Enter each individual employee into the main frame by social security number. b. Complete the Cardkey Request Form CDC 0.334 and forward to Contractor. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION Section 01 547-3 USE-E I Personnel Security Requirements c. Complete Credential Request Form CDC 0.1137 and forward to Contractor. d. Initiate VMS Request for all Foreign National andfor Naturalized Citizen Contractor employees. C. Once the Contractor employee has been both entered into the CDC Mainframe and the Person net Security Processing Of?ce has received the Faxed Form. the Personnel Security Processing Of?cer will contact {via phone) the employee to set up a PHASE I Appointment (Fingerprinting Appointment]. Prior to the Phase I Appointment. the Contractor employee shall collectl'complete the following items and shall be prepared to present them at their Phase I Appointment: 1. OF 306 (Declaration for Federal Employment) 2. Safety Survival Skills Training (Must have training certi?cate) 3. CDC Form 0334 (CDC Cardltey Request Form). It should be noted that not all employees receive a Cardkey. The Contractor needs to inform the Personnel Security Specialist when a Cardkey is not required. 4. CDC Form 0.113? Credential Request Form) 5 Appropriate Identification. Social Security Card. Visa, Green-Card. Picture ID D. CDC Safety Survival Skills Training. Contractor shall contact the Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative (Construction Manager) to discuss options for completing the required CDC Safety Survival Skills Training. 1. A Contractor employee is not required to be in the CDC Mainframe Computer before safety training may start. 2. Contractor employee may complete the CDC Safety Survival Skills Training requirement in one of two ways; a. Attend Instructional Education Training Class; offered twice a month on campus. b. Self-paced readlstudy and test. This is a PDF ?le that includes all material and a test. it can be provided via email PDF attachment by the Contracting Of?cer andlor the Contracting Officer's Technical Representative. The Contractor shall coordinate in order to complete this requirement. After completing the test. the Contractor should Fax the testis) to Mr. Monty Moore. (404) 639-3489 (telephone) and (404)639-2294 (Fax for answer sheet}. OHS will then send the Contractor the Certi?cate of Completion. E. Phase 1 Appointment; Fingerprinting tit Initiation of SF-BS Paperwork. Contractor personnel should report to the Personnel Security Processing Office. at Building 21. Roybal Campus or the Yale Building. Koger Center for their lnitialfPhase I Appointment. at the time and date scheduled with the Personal Security Specialist. When the Contractor?s employee arrives for their Phase I Appointment. a Personnel Security Specialist will check all paperwork [in accordance with Paragraph 1.3.C. above) for completeness. if the forms are in order. the employee will be ?ngerprinted using digital ?ngerprint technology. which allows for rapid check and results from the National Criminal Information Center (NCIC) database. 1. After the ?ngerprinting is complete. the personnel security specialist will collect the paperwork and issue the employee a receipt. indicating that NACI has been submitted and that ?ngerprint results will be completed within 72 consecutive hours. excluding weekends and federal holidays. It should be noted that the Cardkey Forrn (CDC Form 0.334) will be held at the Personnel Security Processing Office and not forwarded for processing at the Cardkey Of?ce until after the ?ngerprint results come back approved. Thus although it takes roughly "(z-hours for return of ?ngerprint approval. on average. it could take an additional week to get the Cardkey back from the Cardkey Of?ce. For all employees. ?ngerprints must be cleared prior to the issuance of a CDC ID Badge {with or without Cardkey}. SENSITWE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) .s . P2009453 Section 015474 $5233.? i, FORI . I Personnel Security Requirements 2. Initiation of SF-B5 Papenivork. (It is now a requirement for the SF-35 to be completed on-line. Handwritten copies of this form are no longer accepted. Initiation of each employee's SF-SS will be completed at the Phase I Appointment. This consists of inputting the employee's Name and and creation of a ?Temporary Password" into the system. Once initiation has been completed, employees will be able to work and complete their from any computer; at home, of?ce, etc.) F. Phase Appointment; Completion of 81 Badge Pick-up. The Phase [1 Appointment will be scheduled by the Personnel Security Specialist during the Phase I Appointment. Note that when scheduling the Phase II Appointment, consideration should be given to allow enough time for accurate completion of the SF-35 and complete processing of ?ngerprints (to include time required for the Card key Of?ce to create the new Cardkey). 1. The most important step for the employee between the two appointments is completion of the SF-85. The Contractor employee?s first step in completing the SF- 35 on their own should be to change password information. Note that as previously stated a temporary password will be set up by. the Physical Security Specialist and employee during the initiation of the SF-85, at the Phase I Appointment. Accuracy of the SF-85 is extremely important. All items must be answered and timelines should be completed Without time-gaps. Once complete, the SF-85 should be printed tiff but should not be signed. The employee should submit the entire form electronically to the CDC Personnel Security Processing Of?ce. Employees should bring the unsigned signature page to their Phase ll Appointment. Any errors found on the'SF-Bs during review can be corrected easily at the Phase II Appointment by the employee, at which time a new signature page can be printed off. Note that case numbers are automatically assigned to SF-85 paperwork. Each page of an individual?s SF-BS is assigned the same case number including the signature page. These numbers must match on all pages in order for the SF-85 to be accepted, processed. and badging delays avoided. For this reason. the employee should not sign the last page until it is reviewed and signature is approved by the Personnel Security Specialist during the Phase II Appointment. 2. Once the SF-85 'is approved and signed by the employee, a Photo will be taken and the CDC Badge will be created. If the Cardkey Office has returned the Cardkey to the Personnel Security Processing Office. the 1D Badge will be applied and the BadgerCardkey will be provided to the employee, thus concluding the process. In most cases, Mo appointments will be required to complete this process. In some cases however, where Cardkeys are delayed in their return from the Cardkey Office, three may be required. Employees should note that the entire process will be complete at the end of the second appointment and that the third appointment will be used to simply issue the ID Badge and Cardkey. 1.4 Extension or Renewal of Cardkey andl'or Badge A. The extension or renewal of the Cardkey or badge will be coordinated through the Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative (Construction Manager). The renewal procedures are as follows: 1. Contractor transmits list of employees to the Contracting Officer. 2. All Contractor employees seeking extensionlrenewal shall retake the CDC Safety Survival Skills Training Course, submit the examination and receive a new, updated Certificate of Completion. 3-. Upon receipt of the list of employees, CDC will perform the following tasks: a. Update each employee in the mainframe by social security number. b. Complete an updated Cardkey Request Form CDC 0.834. c. Complete an updated Credential Request Form CDC 0.113? BUT INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION [Sour P2009453 Section 01547-5 (WW I Personnel Security Requirements 252mm d. Transmit Forms 0.834 and 0.1137 to Contractor. 4. After successfully completing the Safety Survival Skills Training and gathering the required paperwork (identified above. plus the appropriate identi?cation requirements). the Contractor or employee shall contact the Personnel Security Of?ce to schedule an appointment for ID renewal. 5. Security will then print out an updated identi?cation badge form which will be attached to the existing Cardkey. B. The Contractor shall initiate the request for extension a minimum of three weeks prior to the expiration of the Cardkey or identi?cation badge to ensure work may continue uninterrupted on the project. If work has to be stopped because of the Contractor's neglect in not renewing employees' Cardkey or identification badges. the contract time shall not be extended. 1.5 Anticipated Time A. Each Contractor?s experience with the security process may differ because of varying number of employees and other situations. However, based on recent experiences, 10 hours per employee may be anticipated for the security process. The anticipated number of days to complete the security process is estimated at 20. B. The estimated number of days and time per employee by sequenced steps are listed below. Estimated Number Estimated Hours of Days Per in lo ee Employee List 7 SF3OGISF85 5 4 Safety Traininngingerprinting 3 Identification Badge 1 3 1.6 Restricted Areas A. The Contractor will be informed of areas where construction personnel are permitted and areas considered restricted. If a Contractor's employee is found in an area designated as restricted. the employee will immediately be permanently removed from the project site. Future access to the employee on any and all CDC projects will be denied. 1. The Contractor is responsible for the immediate replacement of the employee. 2. Removal of the employee will not constitute a justifiable delay in the completion date of the project nor a claim for additional compensation. Return of Contract Documents A. Upon completion of the contract. the Contractor shall return all copies of the Contract Documents to the Contracting Of?cer. 1.3 Photographs A. The Contractor is not permitted to make photographs for a project portfolio on a CDC campus unless authorized by the Contracting Of?cer or CDC Office of Physical Security. Other photography requires approval of the Contracting Officer and Office of Physical Security prior to photographing. 1. The project?s Construction Manager will have knowledge of the current requirements SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Ih![3: :12 US C2. 2623M SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION P2009453 Section 01547-6 MODIFICATIONS.EOR-I- -- I Personnel Security Requirements for photography requests and may provide assistanoe to the Contractor in initiating the process. PART 2 - NOT USED. PART 3 - NOT USED. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED IN FDRMATI ON (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section 01700-1 Contract Closeout SECTION 01700 CONTRACT CLOSEOUT PART GENERAL 1.1 CONTRACT CLOSEOUT A. in order to achieve Final Acceptance and Contract Closeout. the Contractor shall understand this section and provide all requirements contained herein. 1.2 SUBMITTALS A. Submit in accordance with the requirements of Section 01300. the following: 1 Project as built documents. as they exist the dayr of Final Acceptance. 2 Operational and maintenance data. 3 Video tapes and DVDs of servicing. maintenance. and operational training meetings. 4. Warranties. 5. Spare parts and maintenance materials. 6 All keys to rooms. panels. elevators, and all other spaces and equipment. 7 Test and Balance report. 8 completed and certi?ed. 9. Commissioning Report as the report exists the day of Final Acceptance. 10. Complete commissioning test scripts. 11. Certi?ed Life Safety Code systems by OHS and FMEO. 12. Approved short circuit study' and all settings completed. 13. Working and acceptable to Contracting Of?cer LAN for Cardkey and BAS. 14. Security accepted system. 1.3 PROJECT AS BUILT DOCUMENTS A. Maintain on site. one set of the following record documents. Record actual revisions to the Work as the revisions are completed: Contract Drawings. Specifications. Amendments. Contract Modi?cations and other amendments to the contract. Reviewed shop drawings. product data. and samples. Scope of Work (30W) or similar documents forming the basis of contract award for a SOC project. B. Store Record Documents separate from documents used for construction. C. Record information concurrent with construction progress. D. Speci?cations: Legibiy mark and record at each product section description of actual products installed. including the following; 1. Manufacturers name and product model and number. 2. Product substitutions or alternates utilized. 3. Changes made by amendments and modifications. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION . - (330132009453 Section coco-2 MODIFICATIONS FOR-I- - - -- - Contract Closeout E. As Built Documents and Shop Drawings: Leginy mark each item to record actual construction including: 1. Measured horizontal and vertical locations of underground utilities and appurtenances. referenced to permanent surface improvements. 2. Measured locations of internal utilities and appurtenances concealed in construction. referenced to visible and accessible features of the Work. 3. Field changes of dimension and detail. 4. Details not on original Contract Drawings. For Solution Order Concept (SOC) projects. the shop drawings. product data. and similar submittals may be the only drawings produced by the Contractor. Therefore. it is most important that such information be maintained and recorded in a clear and precise manner so that CDC may update existing record drawings. 1. As a minimum. the Contractor shall provide revisions to drawings or sketches provided by CDC to all work required under the contract. F. Submit documents to Contracting Of?cerfor review and acceptance prior to the ?nal Application for Payment. 1.4 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA A. Submit ?ve (5) sets prior to final inspection. bound in 8-1I2 11 inch text pages. three side ring capacity expansion binders. Additionally. provide a CD Rom With all information as contained in final and acceptable printed version. 1. Prepare binder covers with printed title AND MAINTENANCE title of project. and subject matter of binder when multiple binders are required. 2. Contents: Prepare a Table of Contents for each volume. with each Product or system description identified. type on 30 pound white bond paper. 3. Internally subdivide the binder contents with permanent page dividers. logically organized as described below; with tab titling clearly printed under reinforced laminated plastic tabs. 4. Part 1: Directory. listing names. addresses. and telephone numbers of Government. Contractor. Sub contractors. all lower tier subcontractors and materials and equipment suppliers. 5. Part 2: Operation and maintenance instructions. arranged by system and subdivided by speci?cation section. For each category. identify names. addresses. and telephone numbers of Subcontractors and suppliers. Identify the following: Signi?cant design criteria. List of equipment. Parts list for each component. Operating instructions. Maintenance instructions for equipment and systems. Maintenance instructions for finishes. including recommended cleaning methods and materials and special precautions identifying detrimental agents. 6. Part 3: Project documents and certi?cates. including the following: a. Shop drawings and product data. b. Certificates. c. Photocopies of warranties and bonds. ceases B. Submit one copy of completed volumes and one copy of each DVD in ?nal form for acceptance 15 days prior to final inspection. This copy will be returned after final inspection. with Government comments. Revise content of documents as required prior to final submittal. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEW-BUILDING INFORMATION P2009453 Section o1 700-3 MODIHCATIQ ms .. I Contract Closeout C. Submit final volumes and DVDs revised. within ten days after ?nal inspection and prior to ?nal Application for Payment. 1.5 VIDEO TAPING and DVDs A. Video Taping 1. All servicing. maintenance. and operational training meetings for the Government personnel as required by individual sections of the speci?cations shall be taped. The taping shall be done on a video format and transferred to DVD. or recorded directly onto a DVD. 2. Thetraining sessions shall be videotaped as scheduled on the site for the respective equipment manuals and including the Government personnel question and answer period. All taping equipment. video tapes. DVDs. and video taping personnel shall be provided by the Contractor. a. All video tapes shall be edited to reduce background noise and all questions and answers and lectures shall be edited for clarity. b. The transfer from tape to DVD shall be done so that all CDC computers are able to read the DVDs b. All videos and DVDs shall be labeled with the name and date of the system or equipment being demonstrated. B. Submit one copy of each DVD in ?nal form for acceptance 15 days priorto final inspection. This copy will be returned afterfinal inspection. with Government comments. Revise content of documents as required prior to ?nal submittal of DVD. C. Submit ?nal and revised DVD. within ten days after final inspection and prior to ?nal Application for Payment. 1.6 WARRANTIES A. Provide copies of warranties certified by manufacturer. B. Execute and assemble documents from Subcontractors, suppliers, and manufacturers. C. Provide Table of Contents and assemble in three side ring binder with durable cloth cover. Additionally. provide a CD Rom with all information as contained in printed version. D. Submit for acceptance prior to final Application for Payment and. as required by Contracting Of?cer?s review. revised submissions. E. For items of Work delayed beyond date of Final Acceptance. provide Updated submittal within ten days after acceptance. listing date of acceptance as start of warranty period. SPARE PARTS AND MAINTENANCE MATERIALS A. Provide products, spare partsI maintenance and extra materials In quantities specified in individual specification sections. B. Deliverto project site and place in location as directed bvthe Contracting Officer; obtain receipt prior to Final Application for Payment- PART 2 - NOT USED. seusmvs eur UNCLASSIFIED (sac) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) INFORMATION P2009453 .. I 252$?: .. PART 3 - NOT USED. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 01700-4 Contract Closeout 262301} coc P2009453 .. I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 017'10-1 Cleaning SECTION 01710 CLEANING PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SAFETY REQUIREMENTS: A. 0. Store volatile and toxic waste in covered metal containers. Remove from Project site daily. Provide adequate ventilation during use of volatile or toxic substances. Prohibited practices: 1. Allow no volatile or toxic wastes to accumulate on Project site. 2. Burning or burying of waste materials or rubbish on Project site unless required permits are obtained. 3. Disposal of volatile wastes such as mineral spirits. oil. or paint thinner in storm or sanitary drains. on pavements. in gutters or downspouts. or on Project site. 4. Disposal of waste or cleaning materials which contain materials harmful to plant growth on Project site. Clean up accidentally spilled materials as quickly as possible. 1.2 CLEAN-UP DURING CONSTRUCTION: A. Execute cleaning procedures daily to insure that building, Project site. and adjacent properties are maintained free from debris and rubbish. Wet down materials subject to blowing. Throwing waste materials from heights is prohibited. Provide covered. on?site containers for waste collection. Place all waste materials and rubbish in containers in an expeditious manner to prevent accumulation. Remove waste from Project site daily when containers become full. Legally.r dispose of all waste materials. rubbish. volatile materials. and cleaning materials off Project site. Clean and maintain interior spaces prior to start of finish painting in a "vacuum clean" state daily until Date of Substantial Completion. Protect newly ?nished and clean surfaces from contamination during cleaning operations. Accumulation of debris contributing to survival or spread of rodents, roaches. or other pests is prohibited. 1. Remove debris containing food scraps on a daily basis. 2. Contractor shall be responsible for securing services of a pest exterminator at no additional cost to the Government. Disposal of materials in waterways is prohibited. Graf?ti or other similar distasteful comments or illustrations authored on anyr building SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION rseui SENSITIVE EIUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI CDC P2009453 Section 017'10?2 '?lt'm?ifi -- I Cleaning 252mb;- m'aterials used on Project are prohibited. Monitor Project for violations of this criteria. and if found. take appropriate action immediately to cover or replace defaced materials as necessary. Water intrusion and leaks. whether through the building envelope or arising from leaks in piping. plumbing. drains. or other mechanical systems. shall be immediately corrected and dried using accepted industry standards. If excessive moisture remains beyond 43 hours following the incident. appropriate strategies shall be employed to determine if microbial contamination is present. and take appropriate remedial steps following accepted industry guidelines to assure the structure is returned toa clean and dry condition. 1.3 DAILY CLEAN UP: A. Clean all finished surfaces and the Project site thoroughly. The Project site must be ready for Government use during normal duty hours. B. Remove dust. debris. oils. stains. fingerprints and labels from exposed interior finish surfaces. including glazing materials. 1.4 FINAL CLEAN UP: A. Clean all finished surfaces in accord with manufacturer's product data and requirements . specified in sections prior to Date of Final Acceptance. Perform all general and specific cleaning prior to request for Project or portion thereof to be inspected for Final Acceptance. E. Remove dust. debris. oils. stains. fingerprints and labels from exposed interior finish surfaces. including glazing materials. 0. Replace. patch. and touch-up marred surfaces to match adjacent finishes. Replace materials which cannot be repaired or patched. D. Clean all glass at interior windows that work has been performed on in that area on all buildings. END OF SECTION SENS BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) (bjl33242 262aih} CDC P2009453 .. I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI - BUILDING INFORMATION Section 02225-1 Minor Demolition for Remodeling SECTION 02225 MINOR DEMOLITION FOR REMODELING PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 SUMMARY A. Section Includes the following: Demolishing designated building equipment and fixtures. Demolishing designated construction. Demolishing, disconnecting and capping designated utilities. Cutting and alterations for completion of the Work. Protecting items designated to remain. Removing demolished materials. GENERAL A. The following standards listed below form a part of the specification: 1. 29 CFR Part 1925 Subpart - Demolition [1926.350 1926.860] 2. ANSI mos-1990: Safety Requirements for Demolition Operations 3. 40 CFR 82-03: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone B. Do not begin demolition until authorization is received from the Contracting Of?cer. Remove rubbish and debris from the project site; do not allow excessive accumulations. Store material that cannot be removed daily in areas speci?ed by the Contracting Of?cer. SUBMITTALS A. Demolition Plan: Submit proposed salvage. demolition. and removal procedures to the Contracting Officer for approval before work is started. Demolition Plan shall include. but is not limited to. addressing topics as listed below: 1. Structures 2. Utilities and Related equipment 3. Paving and Slabs 4. Roofing 5. MESOFIW 6. Concrete 8. Disposal Permits: Obtain necessary permits in conjunction with treatment and disposition of oil- contaminated soil. and submit the permits to the Contracting Officer. C. Proposed noise-control measures: Coordinate with Government to establish noise control criteria. CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS A. Section 01700: requirements for submittals. B. Project Record Documents: Accurately record actual locations of capped utilities, concealed utilities discovered during demolition. and subsurface obstructions. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION US CDC P2009453 HVAC MODIFICATIONSFO Rt. I 1.5 1.6 1-7 1.3 1.9 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION [33le BUILDING INFORMATION Section 02225-2 Minor Demolition for Remodeling MATERIALS OWNERSHIP A. Except for item or materials indicated to be reused' salvaged, reinstalledI or otherwise indicated to remain the Government's property. demolished materials shall become the Contractor's property and shalt be removed from the site with further disposition at the Contractor's option. Every opportunity to recycle demolished materials shall be made by the Contractor. Conform to local regulations and environmental regutations for disposal of debris. REGULATORY AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS: A. Comply with federal and local hauling and disposal regulations and all standards listed elsewhere within these speci?cations. QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Demoiition Firm Qualifications: Engage an experienced firm that has successfully completed demolition Work similar to that indicated for this Project B. Regulatory Requirements: Comply with governing EPA notification regulations before starting demolition. Comply with hauling and disposal regulations of authorities having jurisdiction. PROJECT CONDITIONS A. The Government will ocCUpy portions of the facility and site immediately adjacent to demolition area. Conduct demolition so that disruption of the Government's operations will be minimized. Provide not less than ?2 hours notice to the Government of activities that will affect use of the facility by the Government. B. The Government assumes no responsibility for actual condition of items to be demolished. 1. Conditions existing attime of inspection for proposal will be maintained by the Government as far as practical. 2. After the project is begun. the Contractor is responsible for the condition of items to be demolished. The Government does not warrant that the condition of items to be demolished will not have changed since the time of inspection for proposal. DUST AND DEBRIS CONTROL: A. Prevent the spread of dust and debris to adjacent occupied buildings and areas. and avoid the creation of a nuisance (or hazard) in the surrounding area. B. Do not use water if it results in hazardous or objectionable conditions such as. but not limited to. ice. flooding. or pollution. PROTECTION A. Traffic Control Signs: Where pedestrian and driver safety is endangered in area of removal work' use (person who directs traffic), orbarricades. Barricades must have flashing lights if used after 5:00pm and before 8:00am. Notify the Contracting Officer prior to beginning such work. B. Existing Work: Protect existing work which is to remain in place1 be reused. or remain the property of Government. Repair items which are to remain and which are damaged during the performance of their work to their original condition, or replace with new. Provide new supports UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATJDN (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION ib}(3}242 262arn} P2009453 I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION Section 32225-3 Minor Demolition for Remodeling and reinforcement for existing construction weakened by demolition or removal work. Repairs. reinforcement. or structural replacement must have Contracting Of?cers approval. C. Weather Protection: For the portions of the structures to remain. protect building interior and materials and equipment from the weather at all times. Where removal of existing roofing is necessary to accomplish work. have materials and workmen ready to provide adequate and temporary covering of exposed areas so as to ensure effectiveness and the prevent displacement. 1.11 BURNING: Burning will not be permitted. 1.12 RELOCATIONS: Perform the removal and reinstallation of relocated items as indicated with workmen skilled in the trades involved. Repair items to be relocated which are damaged or replace damaged items with new undamaged items as approved by the Contracting Of?cer. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 REPAIR MATERIALS A. Use repair materials identical to existing materiats 1. Where identical materials for exposed surfaces are unavailable or cannot be used. use materials that visually match existing adjacent surfaces to the fullest extent possible. 2 Use materials whose installed performance equal or surpass that of existing materials. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. 'Verify that utilities have been disconnected. rerouted, capped. andlor sealed. B. insofar as is practicable. arrange operations to reveal unknown or concealed structural conditions for examination and verification before removal or demolition. C. When unanticipated mechanical. electrical. or structural elements or conditions that cen?ict with the intended function or design are encountered. investigate and measure the nature and extent of the conflict. submit a written report to the Government. D. Survey the condition of the site to determine whether removing any element might result in structural de?ciency. overloading. failure. or unplanned collapse of any portion of the building or adjacent structures during demolition. E. Perform continuing surveys as the work progresses to detect hazards resulting from demolition or construction activities. 3.2 UTILITY SERVICES A. Maintain existing utilities indicated to remain in service and protect them against damage during selective demolition operations. 1. Do not interrupt existing utilities serving occupied or operating facilities, except when authorized in writing by Government and authorities having jurisdiction. Provide temporary services during interruptions to existing utilities. as acceptable to Government and to sensitive sur INFORMATION issu; - BUILDING INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION coo P2009453 Section 02225.4 '?wmc FOR Minor Demolition for Remodeling 262mm governing authorities. Provide not less than hours notice to Government if shutdown of service is required during changeover. B. Utility Requirements: Locate. identify. disconnect, and seal or cap off indicated utility services serving building to be demolished. 1. Arrange to shut off indicated utilities with utility companies 2. Where utility companies are required to be removed, relocated. or abandoned. provide bypass connections to maintain continuity or service to other parts of the building proceeding with demolition. 3. Cutoff pipe or conduit in walls or partitions to be removed. Cap. valve. or plug and seal the remaining portion of pipe or conduit after bypassing. C. Identify location of capped utilities on project record documents. 3.3 PREPARATION A. Protect existing trees and appurtenances which are not to be demolished. B. Mark Location of utilities. C. Inspect job for conditions which would prevent satisfactory execution of this work and for conditions at variance with Drawings. Do not proceed until these conditions are corrected or resolved. D. Drain. purge. or otherwise remove. collect. and dispose of chemicals. gases. explosives. acids. fiammables. or other dangerous materials. if any. before proceeding with demolition operation E. Conduct demolition operations and remove debris to ensure minimum interference with roads. streets. walks. and other adjacent occupied and used 1. Do not close or obstruct streets. walks. or other adjacent occupied or used facilities without permission from Government and authorities having jurisdiction. Provide alternate routes around closed or obstructed traf?c ways if required by governing regulations or if indicated on Contract Documents. 3.4 POLLUTION CONTROLS A. Use temporary enclosures and other suitable methods to limitthe spread of dust and dirt. Comply with governing environmental protection regulations. 1. Do not use water when it may damage existing construction or create hazardous or objectionable conditions. such as ice. flooding. and pollution. B. Remove and transport debris in a manner that will prevent spillage on adjacent surfaces and areas. 1. Remove debris from eIevated portions of building by chute. hoists. or other device that will convey debris to grade level. C. Clean adjacent structures and improvements of dust. dirt. and debris caused by demolition operations. Return adjacent areas to condition existing before start of demolition. 3.5 DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS sur UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (sac) BUILDING INFORMATION Ib?3li42 262301} coo P2009453 I 3.5 3.7 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION Section 02225-5 Minor Demolition for Remodeling A. Conduct demolition to minimize interference with adjacent occupancies. B. Do not permit demolition equipment on areas outside the Limits of Wont. No heavy equipment on tracks shall be permitted on paved areas outside the Limits of Work. C. Implement Debris and Dust Control procedures as approved. If water is used. contractor shall provide hoses for this purpose. D. Remove. cap. andior reroute identi?ed utilities within Limits of Work. as noted in the Contract Documents or as identi?ed by the Contractor. Utilities are to laminate in a manner conforming to the nationally recognized code covering the speci?c utility and approved by the Contracting Of?cer. E. Continuously clean-up and remove demolished materials from site. Do not allow materials to accumulate on the site. I. Do not burn or bury materials on site. Do not leave materials on site except as part of an approved recycling plan. Leave site in clean condition PATCHING: Where removals leave holes and damaged surface exposed in the ?nished work. patch and repair these holes and damaged surfaces to match adjacent finished surfaces. Where new work is to be applied to existing surfaces. perform removals and patching in a manner to produce surfaces suitable for receiving new work. Finished surfaces of patched area shall be flush with the adjacent existing surface and shall match the existing adjacent surface as closely as possible as to texture and ?nish. Patching shall include: A. Holes and depressions left as a result of removals in existing masonry walls to remain shall be completely ?lled with an approved masonry patching material. applied in accordance with the manufacturer's printed instructions. DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL A. Title to Materials: Except where specified in other sections. all materials and equipment removed. and not reused. shall become the property of the Contractor and shall be removed from Government property unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the Government in accordance with the accepted recycling plan. Title of materials resulting from demolition. and from materials and equipment to be removed. is vested in the Contractor upon approval by the Contracting Of?cer of the Contractor?s demolition and removal procedures. and authorization by the Contracting Of?cer to begin demolition. The Government will not be responsible for the condition or loss of. or damage to. such property after notice to proceed. Material and equipment shall not be viewed by prospective purchasers or sold on the site. B. Salvaged Materials and Equipment: Remove materials and equipment that are to be removed by the Contractor and that are to remain on the property of the Government. and deliver to a storage site as directed by the Government. The Government maintains the right to direct the Contractor to salvage any materials or equipment during the entire duration of the project. C. Recycling 1 Pursuant to Executive Order 13101. Greening the Government Through Waste Prevention. Recyciing. and Federai Acquisition. CDC is committed to recycling. CDC encourages the ssusmve BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION {ssui - eurLomo CDC - -- - I 3 4 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ BUILDING INFORMATION Section 02225-6 Minor Demolition for Remodeling reduction of construction and demolition waste by reducing debris. reusing materials. and recycling. Contractor shall include in the initial proposal a Construction Waste Management Plan for the reuse. recycling, redirection, and other diversions from a landfill of construction wastes and demolition during construction activities. This plan shall be evaluated by the CDC Project Of?cer. and if deemed acceptable. shall be implemented upon approval by the Contracting Of?cer. The Contractor shall submit documentation on a weekly basis for each item on the Waster Management Plan. The Contractor shalt meet. as a minim um. the USGBC LEED Reference Guide for Green Building Design and Construction. Materials and Resources Credit 2 Construction waste Management, latest edition. This guide requires at least 50% of non hazardous construction waste to be recycled or salvaged. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) - BUILDING INFORMATION CDC P2009453 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION - BUILDING INFORMATION Section 04065-1 [b}[3}242 262301} Masonry Mortar and Grout SECTION 04065 MASONRY MORTAR AND GROUT PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Mortar for masonry. B. Grout for masonry. 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 04810 - Unit Masonry Assemoties B. Section 08115 - Standard Steel Frames 1.03 REFERENCES A. ACI 53IJIASCE SITMS 402 - Building Code Requirements For Masonry Structures; American Concrete Institute InternationalSpeci?cation for Masonry Structures; American Concrete Institute International. C. ASTM 144 - Standard Speci?cation for Aggregate for Masonry Mortar. D. ASTM 150 - Standard Speci?cation for Portland Cement. E. ASTM 207 - Standard Speci?catiOn for Hydrated Lime for Masonry Purposes. F. ASTM 270 - Standard Speci?cation for Mortar for Unit Masonry. G. ASTM 404 - Standard Specification for Aggregates for Masonry Grout. H. ASTM 476 - Standard Speci?cation for Grout for Masonry. I. ASTM 730 . Standard Test Method for Preconstruction and Construction Evaluation of Mortars for Plain and Reinforced Unit Masonry. J. ASTM 1019 - Standard Test Method for Sampling and Testing Grout. K. IMIAWC (CW) - Recommended Practices 8. Guide Speci?cations for Cold Weather Masonry Construction: International Masonry Industry All-Weather Council. L. IMIAWC - Recommended Practices Guide Speci?cations for Hot Weather Masonry Construction; International Masonry Industry All-Weather Council. 1.04 A. See Section 01300 - Submittals. for submittal procedures. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION coc P2009453 .HVAC Foe-l -- i :12 EBEaih G. 1.05 A. 1.08 A. 1.0? A. B. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION Section 04065-2 Masonry Mortar and Grout Product Data: Include design mix and indicate whether the Proportion or Property specification of ASTM 270 is to be used. Also include required environmental conditions and admixture limitations. Samples: Submit two samples of mortar, illustrating mortar color and color range. Reports: Submit reports on mortar indicating conformance of mortar to property requirements of ASTM (3 2m and test and evaluation reports per ASTM 780. Reports: Submit reports on grout indicating conformance of component grout materials to requirements of ASTM 4T5 and test and evaluation reports to ASTM 1019. Manufacturer?s Certificate: Certify that products meet or exceed specified requirements. Manufacturers Instructions: Submit packaged dry mortar manufacturer?s installation instructions. QUALITY ASSURANCE Comply with provisions of ACI 530JASCE EHMS 402 and ACI SITMS 602. except where exceed ed by requirements of the contract documents. DELIVERY, STORAGEI AND HANDLING Maintain packaged materials clean, dry. and protected against dampness. freezing, and foreign matter. ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Cold Weather Requirements: Comply with recommendations of (CW). Hot Weather Requirements: Comply with (HW). PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 A. B. E. 2.02 A. MATERIALS Portland Cement: ASTM 150, Type standard gray color. Hydrated Lime: ASTM 20?. Type S. Mortar Aggregate: ASTM 144. Grout Aggregate: ASTM 404. 1. Coarse Aggregate: Maximum size; No.8. 2. Fine Aggregate: Maximum size; No; 1. Water: Clean and potable. MORTAR MIXES Mortar for Unit Masonry: ASTM 270. Property Specification. 1. Interior, non-ioadbearing masonry: Type N. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI BUILDING INFORMATION coo P2009453 (more uses 262alh} 2.03 2.04 2.05 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION Section 04065-3 Masonry Mortar and Grout MORTAR MIXING A. Thoroughly mix mortar ingredients using mechanical batch mixer. in accordance with ASTM 270 and in quantities needed for immediate use. Maintain sand uniformly damp immediately before the mixing process. Do not use anti-freeze compounds to lower the freezing point of mortar. If water is lost by evaporation. re-temper only within two hours of mixing. W909: Use mortar within two hours after mixing at temperatures of 90 degrees F. or two-and-one? half hours at temperatures under 40 degrees F. GROUT MIXES A. Mix in accordance with ASTM 476; 3,000 psi strength at 23 days; 8-10 inches slump. 1. Fine grout for spaces with smallest horizontal dimension of 2 inches or less. 2. Coarse grout for spaces with smallest horizontal dimension greater than 2 inches. GROUT MIXING A. Thoroughly mix grout ingredients in quantities needed for immediate use in accordance with ASTM 476 for fine and coarse grout. B. Add admixtures in accordance with manufacturer's instructions: mix uniformly. C. Do not use anti-freeze compounds to lower the freezing point of grout. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 3.02 3.03 PREPARATION A. Plug clean-out holes for grouted masonry with block masonry units. Brace masonry to resist wet grout pressure. INSTALLATION A. Install mortar. grout and anchoring cement as specified in other sections. Comply with manufacturer?s product data. B. Work grout into masonry cores and cavities to eliminate voids. C. Do not install grout in lifts greater than 16 inches without consolidating grout by rodding. D. Do not displace reinforcement while placing grout. E. Remove excess mortar from grout spaces. GROUTING A. Perform all grouting by means of low-lift technique. Do not employ high-lift grouting. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (38 BUILDING INFORMATION coc P2009453 Section 04065-4 Eii?inif MQDIFIDAIIDNS EORI - Masonry Mortar and Grout 1. Limit height of pours to 12 inches. 2. Limit height of masonry to 16 inches above each pour. 3. Pour grout only after vertical reinforcing is in place; place horizontal reinforcing as grout is . poured. Prevent displacement of bars as grout is poured. 4. Place grout for each pour continuoust and consolidate immediately; do not interrupt pours for more than 1-12? hours. 3.04 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. An independent testing agency will perform ?eld tests. in accordance with provisions of Section 01400 - Quality Control Procedures. El. Test and evaluate mortar in accordance with ASTM T80 procedures. 0. Test and evaluate grout in accordance with ASTM 1019 procedures. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) - BUILDING INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEIU) DC P20 945 ion 043104 (hilt-3t??2 U305 Unit Masonry Assemblies 262301} SECTION 04810 UNIT MASONRY ASSEMBLIES PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Concrete Block. B. Reinforcement and Anchorage. C. Accessories. 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 04065 - Mortar and Masonry Grout. B. Section 07900 - Joint Sectors 1.03 REFERENCES A. ACI 5301ASCE SIT MS 402 - Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures; American Concrete institute International. B. ACI 530.1IASCE SITMS 602 . Speci?cation For Masonry Structures: American Concrete Institute lntemational. C. ASTM A 82 - Standard Speci?cation for Steel Wire, Plain, for Concrete Reinforcement. D. ASTM A 153m 153M - Standard Speci?cation for Zinc Coating [Hot?Dip} on iron and Steel Hardware. E. ASTM A 24cm 240M Standard Specification for Heat-Resisting Chromium and Chromium- Nickel Stainless Steel Plate. Sheet. and Strip for Pressure Vessels. F. ASTM A 615.0% 615M - Standard Speci?cation for Deformed and Plain Billet?Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement. G. ASTM 90 - Standard Speci?cation for Loadbearing Concrete Masonry Units. H. ASTM 91 - Standard Speci?cation for Masonry Cement. ASTM 129 - Standard Specification for Nonloadbearing Concrete Masonry Units. J. ASTM 140 Standard Test Methods of Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units and Related Units. K. ASTM 150 Standard Speci?cation for Portland Cement. L. ASTM C. 20? - Standard Speci?cation for Hydrated Lime for Masonry Purposes. M. ASTM 270 - Standard Specification for Mortar for Unit Masonry. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ coc P2009453 anc MQDIFICATIONS FORI . I US Ci 55 262cm;- SENSITIVE eur UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (sec) Section 04310-2 Unit Masonry Assemblies N. ASTM 404 - Standard Specification for Aggregates for Masonry Grout. CI. ASTM 4?6 - Standard Speci?cation for Grout for Masonry. I P. ASTM 7?80 - Standard Test Method for Preconstruction and Construction Evaluation of Mortars for Plain and Reinforced Unit Masonry. Ci. ASTM 226 - Standard Speci?cation for Asphalt-Saturated Organic Felt Used in Roo?ng and Waterproo?ng. R. - Recommended Practices 8: Guide Specifications for Cold Weather Masonry Construction; International Masonry industry Ali-Weather Council. - I S. IMIAWC - Recommended Practices 3. Guide Specifications for Hot Weather Masonry Construction; International Masonry industry Ali-Weather Council. T. SMACNA (ASMM) - Architectural Sheet Metal Manual: Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors' National Association. U. 12 Cold 'Applied Asphalt Mastic (Extra Thick Film}; Society for Protective Coatings. V. UL (FRD) - Fire Resistance Directory; Underwriters Laboratories Inc. 1.04 SUBMITTALS A. See Section 01300 - Administrative Requirements. for submittal procedures. B. Product Data: Provide data for masonry units. fabricated wire reinforcement. and accessories. indicate fastener type and length fOr each installation condition. Indicate corrosion protection for each item including fasteners. C. Shop Drawings: Detail fabrication. bending and placement of reinforcing bars. Follow 301. showing bar schedules, stirrUp spacing. diagrams of bent bars. and arrangement of masonry reinforcement. D. Samples: Submit four samples of block units to illustrate color. texture. and extremes of color range. 2. Samples of reinforcement. anchors. flashing and accessories. InfonnationalSubmittais: 1. Material Test Results (By Testing Laboratory): indicate and interpret results of tests speci?ed under Field Quality Control. See Part 3 of this Section. 2. Material Certi?cates. signed by manufacturers certifying compliance with speci?ed requirements: a. Each type of masonry unit. include test data. measurements. and calculations establishing net area compressive strength of masonry units. moisture content and linear drying shrinkage. b. Time-rated. ?re-resistant masonry units codi?ed by manufacturer to comply with mix design and equivalent thickness requirements of UL for time ratings indicated 1.05 QUALITY ASSURANCE SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ CDC P2009453 .. I (more? uses 252arh} 1.06 1.07 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 04810?3 Unit Masonry Assemblies A. Comply with provisions of ACI SSOIASCE ENNIS 402 and ACI 530.1IASCE BITMS 602. except where exceeded by requirements of the contract documents. B. Manufacturer's Quali?cation: Manufacturer of time-rated. fire-resistant masonry units shall be qualified in writing by Underwriters Laboratories. Inc. for manufacture of ?re-rated units. DELIVERY. STORAGE. AND HANDLING A. Deliver. handle. and store masonry units by means that will prevent mechanical damage and contamination by other materials. B. Keep masonry materials dry. off ground and under covering. Allow air circulation around stacked units. Protect units from staining and physical damage. C. Segregate pallets of various fire-rated units from each other and from other non-rated units; maintain clear indication of rating of stored units for easy identi?cation and selection. D. Deliver reinforcement and accessories in bundles or boxes with waterproof tags. Maintain tags attached until material is incorporated into work. E. Deliver and handle materials to prevent damage or weakening. Prevent accumulation of rust or debris on reinforcement accessories during storing. Store off ground and under cover. ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS A. Cold-Weather Requirements: 1. Do not use frozen materials or materials mixed or coated with ice or frost. Do not build on frozen substrates. Remove and replace unit masonry damaged by frost or by freezing conditions. Comply with recommendations of IMIAWC (CW). 2. Lay no masonry when temperature of surrounding air has dropped below 45 degrees F. unless it is rising. and at no time when it has dropped below 40 degrees F. except with written permission from Contracting Of?cer. 3. When masonry work is authorized at temperatures below 40 degrees but above freezing. provide mortar at temperature between ?0 degrees and 100 degrees Maintain air temperature above 40 degrees on both sides of masonry for ?2 hours after laying. 4. Cold-Weather Cleaning: Use liquid cleaning methods only when air temperature is 40 degrees and above and will remain so until masonry has dried. but not less than 7? days after completing cleaning. B. Hot-WeatherRequirements: 1. Protect unit masonry work when temperature and humidity conditions produce excessive evaporation of water from mortar and grout. Provide arti?cial shade and wind breaks and use cooled materials as required Comply with IMIAWC 2. When ambient temperature exceeds 100 degrees F. or 90 degrees with a wind velocity greater than 8 mph. do not spread mortar beds more than 48 inches ahead of masonry. Set masonry units within one minute of spreading mortar. PART 2 a PRODUCTS 2.01 CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS A. Concrete Block: Comply with referenced standards and as follows: SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION ISBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION was; .5 CDC P2009453 . Section 04310-4 :62th . FORI -- - Unit Masonry Assemblies 1. Size: Standard units with nominal face dimensions of 16 inches and nominal depths as indicated on the drawings for specific locations. 2. Special Shapes: Provide non-standard blocks con?gured for lintels block), control joint edges, and other detailed conditions. Provide bullnose units for outside corners, unless otherwise indicated. 3. Load-Bearing Units: ASTM 90, normal weight, Type II. a. Hollow block, as indicated. b. Exposed faces: Manufacturer's standard color and texture where indicated. c. Aggregate: ASTM 331, normal weight. 4. NoneLoadbearing Units: ASTM C129, lightweight. Typell. a. Hollow block, as indicated. b. Aggregate: ASTM 331, lightweight. 5. CMU for Animal Areas: ASTM 90, normal weight, Type II. a. Hollow block, as indicated. b. Fine textured, smooth surfaced. c. Aggregate: ASTM 33, normal weight aggregates; ASTM 331, lightweight aggregates: expanded shale, clay or slate manufactured by rotary'kiln method. 6. Fire Rated Units: Manufacture 3 inch or larger units to meet all of the requirements for two hours or better (as required), including full scale fire test reports. ASTM E-119. All 4 inch and 6 inch units shall conform to NBC and NRC full scale fire test reports. 2.02 REINFORCEMENT AND ANCHORAGE A. Manufacturers: 1. Basis of Design: Hohmann 3. Barnard, Inc. 2. 3. Masonryr Reinforcing Corporation of America. B. Reinforcing Steal: ASTM A 615r'A 615M Grade 60 deformed billet bars; uncoated. 0. Single Wythe Joint Reinforcement: Truss type; ASTM A 82 steel wire, hot dip galvanized after fabrication to ASTM A 153FA 153M, Class 0.1483 inch side rods with 0.1483 inch cross rods; width as required to provide not more than 1 inch and not less than 1.2 inch of mortar coverage on each exposure. D. Flexible Anchors: 2epiece anchors that permit differential movement between masonry and building frame. 1. Concrete frame: Dovetail anchors of bent steel strap, 3J4 7 inch size 12 gage thick, with triangular wire ties 0.1375 inch thick, hot dip galvanized to ASTM A 153% 153M, .- Class 3-2. 2. Steel frame: Crimped wire anchors for welding to frame. 0.25 inch thick, with triangular wire ties 0.1875 inch thick, hot dip galvanized to ASTM A 153IA 153M, Class 8-2. E. Anchors and Ties to Structural Steel: 1- Anchors: No. 360 12 gage. Gripstay Channels, welded to structural steel. Hot dip galvanized atexterior walls; mill galvanized at other locations. 2. Ties: No. 363-BT Flexible Gripstay Anchor with 12 gage end. F. Dovetail Slots and Ties to Concrete: 1- DovetailSIot: No. 305, 22 gage. 2. Ties: No. 315-BT Flexible Dovetail ties with 12 gage dovetail and; steel. At corner columns, provide anchors using 1M inch wire ties rather than standard 3MB inch wire ties. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFJED INFORMATION (SBUJ SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section 04810-5 Unit Masonry Assemblies G. Anchors To Transverse Masonry; Corners and Intersections: 1. Load Bearing Walls: 1M ?2 inch steel bar. minimum 24 inches long with 2 inch right angle bend on each end. hot dip galvanized to ASTM A 1531A 153M. Class B. 2. Non-Load Bearing Walls: 23 gage x1i4 inch steel mesh. minimum 24 inches long. 1 inch less than wall width. 2.013 ACCESSORIES A. Preformed Control Joints: Rubber material. Provide with corner and tea accessories. fused joints. For use at non-?re rated construction only. 1. Dur-O-Wal; Product Rapid Control Joint CIA 2001. 2. Heckmann Building Products, Inc; Product No. 352 Control Joints. 3. Hohmann Barnard. Inc: Product RS Series - Rubber Control Joint. El. Joint Filler. Closed cell neoprene; oversized 50 percent to joint width; self expanding; width to permit joint sealing between masonry and building structure. For use at non?fire rated construction only. 1. Dur?O-Wal; Product Rapid Expansion Joint 2010 or DIA 2015. 2. Hohmann Barnard. Inc: Product NS - Closed Cell Neoprene Sponge. C. Reinforcing Bar Positioners: Minimum 9 gage steel wire. 1. Dur-O-Wal: CIA 312. 2. Heckmann Building Products. Inc; Product No. 377. 3. Masonry Reinforcing Corporation of America: 4301. D. Powder Actuated Fasteners; Hilti. Inc. Fasteners". E. Cavity Wall Mortar Trap: Polyethylene or nylon mesh in trapezoidal con?guration. One inch thick by 16 inches high. "Mortar Net". F. Wire Mesh Hardware Cloth: 1!2 inch by 16 gage steel mesh. 2 inches less than wall width by 16 inches long minimum. Hot dip galvanized to ASTM A 153. Class 8-2. G. Cold Galvanizing Compound: Pro-mixed. organic zinc liquid containing 90 percent zinc in dried ?lm. Brite Products. Brite Zinc. H. Cleaning Solution: Non-acidic. not harmful to masonry work or adjacent materials- 1. Diedrich Technologies. Inc.. 200 Lime Solv. 2. ProSoCo. H. D. Concrete Cleaner. I. Field Set Steel Rods: diameter smooth steel rods. set In epoxy with plastic cap sleeves. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 EXAMINATION A. Verify that ?eld conditions are acceptable and are ready to receive masonry. B. Verify that related items provided under other sections are properly sized and located. C. Verify that built-in items are in proper location, and ready for roughing into masonry work. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED ENFORMATIDN (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SEU) . coo P2009453 Section mam?s est-.7 i . MODIFICATIONS - Unit Masonry Assemblies 3.02 PREPARATION A. Direct and coordinate placement of metal anchors supplied for installation under other sections. B. Provide temporary bracing during installation of masonry work. Maintain in place until building structure provides permanent bracing. 3.03 INSTALLATION - GENERAL A. Establish lines. levels and coursing. Protect from disturbance. B. Build chases and recesses to accommodate items speci?ed in this Section and other Sections. C. Leave openings for equipment to be installed before completing masonry. After installing equipment. complete masonry to match the construction immediately adjacent to the opening. D. Cut masonry units with motor-driven saws to provide clean. sharp. unchipped edges. Cut units as required to provide a continuous pattern and to ?t adjoining construction. Where possible. use full-size units without cutting. Allow units out with water-cooled saws to dry before placing, unless wetting of units is specified. Install out units with out surfaces and. where possible. cut edges concealed. E. Temporarily brace masonry during erection. and until building structure provides permanent bracing. F. When both sides of a wall will be exposed in the finished work. install masonry from scaffolding erected on both sides of wall. 3.04 COURSING A. Establish lines. levels. and coursing Indicated. Protect from displacement. B. Maintain masonry courses to uniform dimension. Form vertical and horizontal joints of uniform thickness. C. Concrete Masonry Units: Bond: Running. 2. Coursing: One unit and one mortar joint to equal 8 inches. 3- Mortar Joints: Concave. except where flush joints are specified. 3.05 PLACING AND BONDING A. Lay hollow masonry units with face shell bedding on head and bed joints. Butlering corners of joints or excessive furrowing of mortarjoints is not permitted. C. Remove excess mortar as work progresses. D. Interlock intersections and external corners. Do not shift or tap masonry units after mortar has achieved initial eat. Where adjustment must be made. remove mortar and replace. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 .. . I :12 US I: E: 3.08 3.0? 3.08 3.09 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ Section 04810-3" Unit Masonryr Assemblies Perform job site cutting of masonry units with proper tools to provide straight. clean, unchipped edges. Prevent broken masonry unit corners or edges. Cut mortar joints flush when totally concealed and where wall tile, resilient base. or epoxy, high-performance, or special coating is scheduled. Isolate top joint of masonry partitions from horizontal structural framing members and slabs or decks with compressible joint ?ller. REINFORCEMENT AND ANCHORAGE A. Install horizontal joint reinforcement 16 inches on center. El. Place masonry joint reinforcement in first and second horizontal joints above and below openings. Extend minimum 16inches each side of opening. C. Place continuous joint reinforcement in ?rst and second joint below top of walls. D. Lap joint reinforcement ends minimum 8 inches. LINTELS A. Install reinforced unit masonry lintels over openings. 1. Openings from 24 inches to ?8 inches: Place two, No. 5 reinforcing bars 1 inch from bottom web. 2. Do not splice reinforcing bars. 3 Support and secure reinforcing bars from displacement Maintain position within 1.2 inch of dimensioned position. 4. Place and consolidate grout fill without displacing reinforcing. 5. Allow masonry lintels to attain speci?ed strength before removing temporary supports. B. Maintain minimum eight inch bearing on each side of opening. GROUTED COMPONENTS A. El. Lap splices minimum 48 bar diameters. Support and secure reinforcing bars from displacement. Maintain position within 122 inch of dimensioned position. Place and consolidate grout fill without displacing reinforcing. At bearing locations} fill masonry cores with grout for a minimum 12 inches either side of opening. CONTROL AND EXPANSION JOINTS Do not continue horizontal joint reinforcement through control and expansion joints. Form control joint with a sheet building paper bond breaker fitted to one side of the hollow contour and of the block unit. Fill the resultant core with grout till. Rake joint at exposed unit faces for placement of backer rod and sealant. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 Section 04310-3 nut-cz-z42IJ-S i I Unit Masonry Assemblies 2?2alh,? C. Install preformed control joint device in continuous Seal butt and corner joints in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. D. Size control joint in accordance with Section 03?900 for sealant performance. 3.10 BUILT-IN WORK A. As work progresses. install built-in metal door frames, glazed frames. and window frames and other items to be built into the work and furnished Under other sections. B. Install built-in items plumb. level. and true to line. C. Bed anchors of metal door and giazed frames in adjacent mortarjoints. Fill frame voids solid with grout. Fill adjacent masonry cores with grout minimum 12 inches from framed openings. D. Do not build into masonryr construction organic materials that are subject to deterioration. 3.11 TOLERANCES A. Maximum Variation From Unit to Adjacent Unit: the inch. Maximum Variation from Plane of Wall: 1f4 inch in 10 fl and 112 inch in 20 ft or more. Maximum Variation from Plumb: 1M inch in 20 ft: 112 inch maximum. - Maximum Variation from Level Coursing: 1M inch in 20 ft; 1/2 inch maximum. mans! Maximum Variation of Joint Thickness: 1f8 inch in 3 ft. with maximum thickness limited to 1f2 inch. Do not vary joint thickness of adjacent courses by more than 1f8 inch. F. Maximum Variation from Cross Sectional Thickness of Walls: 1M inch. 3.12 CUTTING AND Fl'l'l'lNG A. Cut and ?t for chases. pipes. conduit. and sleeves. Coordinate with other sections of work to provide correct size, shape. and location. B. Obtain approval prior to cutting or fitting masonry work not indicated or where appearance or strength of masonry work may be impaired. 3.13 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. An independent testing agency will perform field qualityr control tests. as speci?ed in Section 01400. B. Mortar Tests: Test each type of mortar in accordance with ASTM 7?80. testing with same frequency as masonry samples. 3.14 CLEANING A. Remove excess mortar and mortar smears as work progresses. B. Replace defective mortar. Match adjacent work. C. Clean soiled surfaces with cleaning solution. SENSITIVE sur UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (sec) CDC P2009453 I U.S.C. 262301} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 04310-9 Unit Masonry Assemblies D. Use non-metallic tools in cleaning operations. 3.15 PROTECTION OF FINISHED WORK A. Protection of Masonry: During construction. cover tops of walls. projections. and sills with waterproof sheeting at end of each day's work. Cover partially completed masonry when construction is not in progress. 8. Stain Prevention: Prevent grout, mortar. and soil from staining the face of masonry to be left exposed or painted. immediately remove grout, mortar. and soil that come in contact with such masonry. 2. 3. 4. Protect base of walls from rain-splashed mud and from mortar splatter by coverings spread on ground and over wall surface. Protect sills. ledges. and projections from mortar droppings. Protect surfaces of window and door frames, as well as similar products with painted and integral ?nishes. from mortar droppings. Turn scaffold boards near the wall on edge at the end of each day to prevent rain from splashing mortar and dirt onto completed masonry. C. Without damaging completed work. provide protective boards at exposed external corners which are subiect to damage by construction activities. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) coc P2009453 Section 07900-1 Still? U5 0 i I Joint Sealers SECTION 07900 JOINT SEALERS PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Sealants and joint backing. B. Precompressed foam sealers. 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS El. Section 04810 - Unit Masonry Assemblies C. Section 09900 - Paints and Coatings 1.03 REFERENCES I I A. Section 01700 Contract Closeout. A. ASTM 834 - Standard Specification for Latex Sealants. ASTM 919 - Standard Practice for Use of Sealants in Acoustical Applications. C. ASTM 920 - Standard Specification for Elastomen'c Joint Sealants. D. ASTM 1193 - Standard Guide for Use of Joint Sealants. ASTM 1667 - Standard Speci?cation for Flexible Cellular Materials?Vinyl Chloride Polymers and Copolymers (Closed-Cell Foam). 1.04 DEFINITIONS A. "Joint Sealers", "caulit". "caulking", or "sealant" are synonymous. and mean "Joint Sealers" as herein described. B. Joint failure: Ajolnt exhibiting one or more of the following characteristics: Air andlor water leakage. Migration andior reversion. Loss of adhesion. Loss of cohesion. Failure to cure. Discoloration. Staining of adjacent work. Development of bubbles, air pockets or voids- 1.05 SUBMIITALS A. See Section 01300 - Submittals. for submittal procedures. B. Product Data: Provide data indicating sealant chemical characteristics. C. Samples: Submit two samples. illustrating sealant colors for selection. Color charts are not acceptable. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 I (01(31242 262301} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 07900-2 Joint Sealers D. Manufacturer's Installation Instructions: indicate special procedures. E. 1.0? Informational Submittals: . 1.06 QUALITY ASSURANCE A I Adhesion compatibility test results: Submit a letter from sealant manufacturer indicating adhesion and compatibility testing has been performed and that materials are compatible and that adhesion is acceptable. Indicate requirements for primers or special preparation. Substrate staining test results: Submit a letter from sealant manufacturer indicating that substrate testing has been performed on actual samples of substrates indicated to receive joint sealers and that sealant was found to be non-staining to substrate. Indicate requirements for primers or special preparation to meet non-staining requirements. Special Warranty: Warrant for three years from Date of Substantial Completion. that sealants and accessories which fail to achieve airtight and watertight seal. exhibit loss of adhesion or cohesion. or do not cure. will be replaced. Warranty shall cover labor and materials, and shall not be pro-rated. Maintain one copy of each referenced document covering installation requirements on site. Prior to application of any sealant. and notwithstanding the specifying of various sealant types and locations of usage. investigate and verify compatibility of the sealant with joint surfaces. joint fillers and other sealants. Provide only materials which are known to be fully compatible with actual installation conditions. Manufacturer Qualifications: Company specializing in manufacturing the Products specified in this section with minimum three years documented experience. Applicator Qualifications: Company specializing in performing the work of this section with minimum three years experience. ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS A. Maintain temperature and humidity recommended by the sealant manufacturer during and 1.08 after installation. COORDINATION A. Coordinate the work with all sections referencing this section. 1.09 A. B. C. WARRANTY See Section 01700 - Contract Closeout. Warranty: airtight seal. and watertight seal. exhibit loss of adhesion or cohesion. or do not cure. Correct defective work within a five year period after Date of Substantial Completion. Include coverage for installed sealants and accessories which fail to achieve PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 A. SEALANTS Not Used. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION coo P2009453 Huac MODIFICATIONS F-ORI - I fol-I25. '42 C: i: 2.02 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 07900-3 Joint Sealers B. Silicone Architectural Sealant; one part, movement capability plus 100 percent l'l'lIIlUS 50 percent. ASTM 0920, Type 8. Grade NS, Glass 25. 1. Dow Corning '795 Silicone Building Sealant". 2. Dow Coming "1199". C. JS-3: Silicone Sanitary Sealant: one part. movement capability plus or minus 25 percent. fungus resistant; ASTM 0920, Type 8. Grade NS. Class 25. 1. GE Silicone "Sanitary WOO Sealant". 2. Dow Corning "7?36 Mildew Resistant Silicone". 3. Tremsll 200 Mildew Resistant. D. JS-4: Not Used. E. JS-5: Not Used. F. JS-G: High Temperature Resistant Sealant: One part acetoxy-cure, RTV silicone. ASTM 0920 Type 5. Grade NS, Class 25. Use NT. and and Federal Specification TT-S- 001543A. TypeNon-sag. Class A. TT-S-UDESUC. Type II. Class A. Trade Mate1 Hi-Temp. Silicone Sealant by Dow Corning ACCESSORIES A Primer: Non-staining type, recommended by sealant manufacturer to suit application B. Joint Cleaner: Non-corrosive and non-staining type, recommended by sealant manufacturer; compatible with joint forming materials. C. Joint Backing: Round foam rod compatible with sealant; ASTM 166?. Type A: closed cell Polyurethane. so? rod. Type B: Open cell rod (secondary backer rod); oversized 30 to 50 percent larger than joint width. D. Bond Breaker: application. Pressure sensitive tape recommended by sealant manufacturer to suit PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 3.02 3.03 EXAMINATION A. Verify that substrate surfaces are ready to receive work. B. Verify that joint backing and release tapes are compatible with sealant. PREPARATION A. Remove loose materials and foreign matter which might impair adhesion of sealant. B. Clean and prime joints in accordance with manufacturer?s instructions. C. Perform preparation in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and ASTM 1193. D. Protect'elements surrounding the work of this section from damage or disfigurement. INSTALLATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) coo P2009453 (motto uses 262a(h} 3.04 3.05 3.06 A. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Soction 07900?4 Joint Sealers Perform work in accordance with sealant manufacturers requirements for preparation of surfaces and material installation instructions. Perform installation in accordance with ASTM 1193. Perform acoustical sealant application work in accordance with ASTM 919. Measure joint dimensions and size joint hackers to achieve width-to-depth ratio. neck dimension. and surface bond area as recommended by manufacturer. except where speci?c dimensions are indicated Install bond breaker where joint backing is not used. Install sealant free of air pockets. foreign embedded matter. ridges. and sags. Apply sealant within recommended application temperature ranges. Consult manufacturer when sealant cannot be applied within these temperature ranges. Tool joints concave. Pro-compressed Foam Sealant: Do not stretch; avoid joints except at corners. ends. and intersections: install with face we to 1r4 inch below adjoining surface. CLEANING A. Clean adjacent soiled surfaces. PROTECTION OF FINISHED WORK A. Protect sealants until CUTECI. SCHEDULE A. C. Lap Joints In Exterior Sheet Metal Work; Type JS-2. Butt Joints in Exterior Metal Work and Siding: Type JS-Z. Interior Joints for Which No Other Sealant is Indicated: Type JS-S. In all openings of walls and ceilings of BSL3 laboratories and animal rooms to provide airtight seal. including all electrical conduits: Type JS-3. For pipe penetrations through non-rated gypsum walls: Type END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Imam use 3 cor; P2009393 Hues-meD-rF-[cstlons I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION . Section 03115-1 Standard Steel Frames SECTION 03115 STANDARD STEEL FRAMES PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section includes nonarated steel frames. 1. Provide frames for interior glazed lights. Related Sections: Section 01300 - Submittats Section 01351 - Sustainable Project Requirements Section 04130 - Unit Masonry Assemblies Section OFQOO - Joint Sealers Section 08225 FRP Doors. Section GENO - Door Hardware Section 09900 - Paints and Coatings 1.2 REFERENCES A. American National Standards Institute: 1. ANSI A2503 - Recommended Speci?cations for Standard Steel Doors and Frames. ASTM International: 1. ASTM A591IA591 - Standard Specification for Steel Sheet. Electrolytic Zinc- Coated. for Light Coating Mass Applications. 2. ASTM A553IA653M - Standard Specification for Steel Sheet. Zinc-Coated {Galvanized} or Zinc-Iron Alloy-Coated {Galvannealed) by the Hot-Dip Process. 1.3 SUBMITTALS E. F. Section 01330 - Submittal Procedures: Suhmittal procedures. Shop Drawings: Indicate frame elevations. reinforcement. anchor types and spacing. location of cut-outs for hardware. and finish. Product Data: Submit frame con?guration and ?nishes. Samples: Submit two samples of frame. 6x6 inch in size illustrating factory ?nished frame colors and surface texture. Manufacturer's Installation Instructions: Submit special installation instructions. Manufacturer's Certificate: Certify products meet or exceed specified requirements. 1.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE A Conform to requirements of ANSI A2503. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) (more uses 262afh} I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009898 Section 08115-2 Standard Steel Frames 1.5 QUALIFICATIONS A. Manufacturer: Company specializing in manufacturing products specified in this section with minimum three years documented experience. 1.6 DELIVERY. STORAGE. AND HANDLING A. Section 01800 - Product Requirements: Product storage and handling requirements. 5. Accept frames on site in manufacturer's packaging. Inspect for damage. (3. Break seal on-site to permit ventilation. 1.7 COORDINATION A. Section 01300 - Administrative Requirements: Coordination and project conditions. B. Courdinate Work with frame opening construction, door. and hardware installation. C. Sequence installation to accommodate required door hardware electric wire connections. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 STANDARD STEEL FRAMES A. Basis of Design Manufacturer: 1. Ceco Door Products. Model SU. B. Product Description: Standard shop fabricated steel frames, ?re rated and non-rated types. 1. Interior Frames: a. Level 2. nominal 16 gagef0.053 inch thick material, base metal thickness. 2.2 ACCESSORIES A. Removable Stops: Rolled steel shape. mitered corners; prepared for countersink style tamper proof screws. B. Bituminous Coating: Non-asbestos fibered asphalt emulsion. C. Primer: ANSI A250.10 rust inhibitive type. D. Silencers: Specified in Section 08710. 2.3 FABRICATION A. Fabricate frames as welded unit. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION ISBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2089898 Section 88115-3 2553.11? i HVACMODIFIGATIONS FORI- I Standard Steel Frames B. Transom Bars for Glazed Lights: Fixed type. of same profiles as jamb and head. C. Fabricale frames with hardware reinforcement plates welded in place. Provide mortar guard boxes. D. Reinforce frames wider than 48 inches with roll formed steel channels titted into frame head. flush with top. E. Prepare frames for silencers. Provide three single silencers for single doors on strike side. 2.4 SHOP FINISHING A B. C. Steel Sheet: Galvanized to ASTM A6531A6 53M A60. Primer: Air dried. Coat inside of frame profile with bituminous coating to minimum thickness of 1116 inch. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. Verify opening sizes and tolerances are acceptable. 3.2 INSTALLATION A. B. C. install frames in accordance with ANSI A2508. Coordinate with masonry wall construction for anchor placement. Coordinate installation of frames with installation of hardware speci?ed in Section 087?10 and doors in Section 08225. 3.3 ERECTION TOLERANCES A. B. Section 01400 - Qualityr Requirements: Tolerances. Maximum Diagonal Distortion: 1:16 inch measured With straight edges. crossed Corner to corner. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI Inti?j: 112' US 55 2432341! HVEIC. MQDIFICATIO NS .. .. .. I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 SECTION 08225 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED POLYESTER (FRP) DOORS PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. Fiberglass Reinforced Polyester Doors. B. Mandatory "Shop-Installed" Hardware. c. Glazing. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01300 Submitters B. Section 08115 Standard Steei Frames 0. Section OBHU Door Hardware 1.3 REFERENOES A. BHMA - Builders' Hardware Manufacturers Association. .4 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Field Measurement: Door manufacturer's representative, door distributor's representative. and general contractor shall take field measurements prior to preparation of shop drawings to ensure proper fitting of work. B. Door dimensions on the contract drawings are nominal dimensions; it is the General Contractor's responsibility to ?eld measure all openings and supply doors of proper size to ?t openings. Contractor shall be responsible for providing sizesitolerances as required for door hardware. 1.5 SUBMITTALS Section 08225-1 FRP Doors A. Shop Drawings: Prepare shop drawings for fabrication and installation: submit to the Contracting Of?cer. Indicate dimensions. frame con?guration. anchor spacings, door elevations. detail sections of typical composite members. hardware mounting heights. stile and rail reinforcement. expansion provisions and glazing. . Product Data: Submit manufacturer?s speci?cations. standard details. and installation recommendations for components of ?berglass reinforced polyester doors required for the project. including test reports certifying that products have been tested and comply with performance requirements. . Samples: Submit 6" 6" sample of door section showing material. thickness. color. texture. and assemny of rails and stiles. urethane core. and ?ber reinforced polyester faces. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASEIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 08225-2 ..MQDIFICAIICINS ORI FRP Dom-5 D. Templates and Diagrams: Furnish hardware templates, diagrams and other data as needed to fabricators and installers of related work, and to Contracting Officer, for project coordination. E. door submittals shall be reviewed concurrently with door hardware submittals. Contracting Officer will not review submittals for FRP doors without receipt of submittals for door hardware. 1.6 QUALIFICATIONS A- Fabricator: Company specializing in performing the work of this Section with minimum 5 years documented experience. DELIVERY. STORAGE. AND HANDLING A. All materials supplied shall be delivered to the jobsite in their original. unopened packages with labels intact. Materials shall be inspected, and the manufacturer informed of any damage or discrepancies. Unsatisfactory materials shall be rejected. B. All materials supplied shall be packaged in individual corrugated cartons. Doors shall "float" within cartons. with no portion of door or hardware in contact with outer shell. 1.8 COORDINATION A. Coordinate the Work with door hardware sizes, types and installation. 1.9 SPECIAL PROJECT WARRANTY A. Provide written warranty signed by the manufacturer, and by the vendor. agreeing to replace fiberglass reinforced doors which fail in material or workmanship within 10 years from the date of acceptance. Failure of material or workmanship includes warping. faulty operation, deterioration of finish or construction in excess of normal weathering. and defects in hardware. weatherstripping. and other components of the work. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 FLUSH-TYPE FIBERGLASS REINFORCED POLYESTER DOORS A. The basis of design for the flush-type fiberglass reinforced polyester doors are based on the following manufacturer and model number: 1. Special-Lite. lnc.: with Class A Option for Flame Spread. 2.2 MATERIALS A. Aluminum Members: Alloy temper for strength. corrosion resistance and application of required ?nish; ASTM 3221 for extrusions. ASTM 3209 for sheetfplate. minimum wall thickness of 0.125". B. Finish: Clear 215 R1 AA-M12622A41, Class 1 anodized. .7 mils or greater thickness. C. Fasteners: Aluminum. or other materials warranted by manufacturer to be non-corrosive and compatible with aluminum components. unless indicated otherwise. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION ISBU) CDC P2009453 Section I FRP Doors D. Stiles and rails shall be joined with mitered cornerjoints and 3l1 6" angle blocks secured by full width 31'8" stainless steel tie rods. top and bottom bolted through an extruded spline and 3l16? riveted reinforcing angles and secured with aircraft type nuts. Use concealed fasteners wherever possible. Brackets and Reinforcement: Manufacturer's high-strength aluminum units where feasible; otherwise. provide non-magnetic stainless steel or hot-dip galvanized steel complying with ASTM A386. Provide manufacturer's standard reinforcement for each type of hardware required. not less than 0.125" thick. 2. Provide manufacturer's recommended fasteners reinforcement. . Core Material: High density urethane foam minimum 5 pounds per cubic foot of density. Core shall not contain any chlorofluorocarbons (CFC's) nor shall be used in the core foaming process. . Face Material: Fiberglass reinforced polyester. .120" minimum thickness. with pebble?like embossed finish. The embossed finish shall be visible on the door. Color shall be selected by the Government from manufacturer?s available colors. and shall be permanently bonded through the full thickness of the ?berglass door faces. 1. Face sheets to be locked in by extruded interlocking edges which are to be an integral part of rails and stiles. Snap-on or applied door edge is not acceptable. 2. Acceptable Product: Subject to compliance with the requirements. provide Glasbord?P. Dyrotech Industries. 3. Impact Strength of Face Sheets: ASTM D256. Izod Impact Strength. 20 foot pounds per inch of notch. 4. Abrasion Resistance of Face Sheets: Model 5130 Taber Abraser with 03-1? abrasive wheel type. and a load weight of 500 gram load per abrading arm (1.000 grams total). 25 cycles. and 100% vacuum. Percent weight loss not to exceed .029. 5. Hardness of Face Sheets: ASTM 02583. Barcol Meter Hardness Test. nominal value: 54. 6. Weatherability - Humidity Resistance of Face Sheets: ASTM [1570. water absorption not greater than 0.20% after 24-hr immersion at WDF. 7. FlamerSmoke Rating: Face sheet tested in accordance with ASTM shall have the following ratings: a. Smoke Developed: Less than 450. b. Flame Spread: Less than 25. B. Flexural Strength: Face sheet tested in accordance with ASTM 0'790 shall have a nominal panel value of 24.000 psi. 9. Color: White Rails and Stiles: Provide extruded 6063 T5 aluminum alloy. All exposed surfaces to be minimum 1i'8" thickness. 1. Stiles shall be tubular to accept hardware. 2. Top and bottom rails to be extruded with legs for interlocking rigidity weather bar. J. Glazing: Provide clear tempered glass. 2.3 DOOR COMPONENTS A. Vision Lites: Fabricate aluminum vision lites to facilitate replacement of 1l4" tempered glass. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SEW U5 Ci 252mm SENSITIVE EIUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 08225-4 FRP Doors coo P2009453 HVAC MODIFICATIONS PEI-RI - I without disassemny of door stiles and rails. Interior glass stops to be screw applied. B. Frame Finish: Clear aluminum (U828). 2.4 HARDWARE A. Coordinate hardware items with Speci?cation Section [18710. 2.5 FABRICATION A. Use the templates provided by hardware item manufacturer. El. All hardware items, with the exception of door closers, deadlocks. astragals. door stops. and automatic door bottoms. shall be shipped to door manufacturer. Door manufacturer shall install hardware on doors in accordance with hardware manufacturer's instructions. C. Door manufacturer shall provide proper preparation all hardware. both factory installed and ?eld installed. D. Complete fabrication. assembly. finishing and other work before shipping doors to project site. Disassemble components only as necessary for shipment and installation. E. Perform fabrication operations. including cutting. fitting. forming. drilling. and grinding of material in a manner which prevents damage to exposed finish surfaces. 1. Sequence: Complete cutting. fitting. forming. drilling. and grinding prior to cleaning. finishing. and surface treatment. Remove arises from out edges and ease edges and corners to radius of 1f16?. 2. Reinforcing: Install reinforcing as necessary for proper installation of door hardware. and for high-traffic perform ance. Separate dissimilar metals with bituminous paint or other separator which will prevent corrosion. . 3. Continuity: Maintain accurate relation of planes and angles. with hairline fit of contacting members. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 INSTALLATION A. Install frames in accordance with manufacturer's speci?cations and instructions. B. Install assemblies plumb. level. and true-to-line. without any warp or twist of doors or frames. 0. Separate aluminum and other corrodible metal surfaces from sources of corrosion or electrolytic action at points of contact with other materials. 3.2 ADJUSTING A. Adjust hardware for smooth and balanced door movement. Door operation and movement to be consistent from one door to another. 3.3 CLEANING A. Remove temporary protection and clean assemblies thorougth prior to acceptance. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU SENSITIVE EIUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 Section 08225-5 ?i??i?rii -- mp Doors 3.4 PROTECTION OF FINISHED WORK A. Do not permit traf?c near ?nished work without protection to finishes. 3.5 SCHEDULE A. Provide in accordance with door schedule on Contract Drawings. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) U5 5 CDC P2009453 pom I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) - BUILDING INFORMATION Section 0871 0-1 Door Hardware SECTION 087'10 DOOR HARDWARE PART - GENERAL 1.01 1.02 1.03 SUMMARY A. This Section includes items known commercially as finish or door hardware that are required for swing doors. 1. Hinges, pivots. and continuous hinges. Lock cylinders and keys. 3. Lock and latch sets. 4 'Bolts. 5. Exit devices. 6. Pushipull units. 7 Closers. 8 Overhead holders. 9 Miscellaneous door control devices. 10. Door trim units. 11. Protection plates. 12. Sound a light seals for interior doors. 13. Automatic drop seals (door bottoms). RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Related Sections: 1. Section 01300 Submittats 2. Section 08115 Standard Steei Frames 3. Section 08225 Fibergiass Reinforced Polyester (FRP) Doors REFERENCES A. National Fire Protection Association 1. No. 80 Fire Doors and Windows 2. No. 101 Life Safetyr Code 13. American National Standard Institute 1. A 11?.1 Specifications for Making Buildings and Facilities Accessible to and Usable by Physically Handicapped People. 2. A 156.13 Materials and Finishes. C. Builder Hardware Manufacturers Association-(BHMA) 1. Materials and ?nishes: BHMA 130? D. Steel Door Institute (SDI) 1. S.D.I. Tech Data Series 100 E. Door and Hardware Institute (DHI) Hardware for labeled tire doors. F. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Public Law 101-336. (3. Georgia Accessibility Code, 0.C.G.A. Chapter 120-3?20. H. Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) SENSITIVE EIIJT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Sgction 087?10-2 imam use. Door Hardware 2623ii?l} 1.04 SUBMITTALS A. Product Data: Submit manufacturer?s technical information for each item of hardware. Include whatever information may be necessary to show compliance with requirements. and include instructions for installation and for maintenance of operating parts and ?nish. Submit final hardware schedule in vertical format. B. Hardware Schedule: Submit ?nal hardware schedule in manner indicated below. Hardware schedules are intended for coordination of work. 1. Final Hardware Schedule Content: Based on builders hardware indicated. organize hardware schedule into hardware sets" indicating complete designations of every item required for each door or opening. include the following information: a. Type. style. function, size. and finish of each hardware item. is. Name and manufacturer of each item. c. Fastenings and other pertinent information. Location of each hardware set cross referenced to indications on Drawings both on floor plans and in door and frame schedule. a. Explanation of all abbreviations. symbols. and codes contained in schedule. Mounting locations for hardware. 9. Door and frame sizes and materials. 2. Submittal Sequence: Submit schedule at earliest possible date particularly where acceptance of hardware schedule must precede fabrication of other work that is critical in the Project construction schedule pressed metal frames). include with schedule the product data. samples. shop drawings of other work affected by door hardware. and other information essential to the coordinated review of schedule. 3. Keying Schedule: Submit separate detailed schedule indicating clearly how the Government's final instructions on keying of locks have been fulfilled. Keying shall conform to the existing Sargent and KESO systems at CDC. (3. Samples: Prior to submittal of the ?nal hardware schedule and prior to ?nal ordering of hardware. if requested. submit one sample of each type of exposed hardware unit. finish as required. and tagged with full description for coordination with schedule. 1. Samples will be returned to the supplier. Units that are acceptable and remain undamaged through submittal. review. and ?eld comparison process may. after ?nal check of operation, be incorporated in the Work. within limitations of keying coordination requirements. 1.05 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Single Source Responsibility: Obtain each type of hardware (latch and lock sets. hinges. closers. etc.) from only one manufacturer offering products complying with these specifications. B. Supplier Qualifications: A recognized builders hardware supplier who has been furnishing hardware within 100 miles of the Project's vicinity for a period of two years. and who is or employees a registered architectural hardware consultant (AHC) who is available. at reasonable times during the course of the work. for consultation about project's hardware requirements to Government. Contracting Officer and Contractor. C. Fire-Rated Openings: Provide door hardware for ?re-rated openings that complies with NFPA Standard No. 30 and requirements of authorities having jurisdiction. Provide only items of door hardware that are listed and are identical to products tested by UL. Warnock Hersey. FM. or other testing and inspecting organization acceptable to authorities having jurisdiction for use on types and sizes of doors indicated in compliance with requirements of tire-rated door and door frame labels. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION CDC P2009453 [bifE,-lE US I: 2623-?; 1.05 1.07 1.03 D. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION Section 08710?3 Door Hardware All hardware shall comply with all State and Federal Handicap codes and laws. Provide tactile warning on the back of all lever handles that enter mechanical. electrical and hazardous areas. PRODUCT HANDLING A. A. A. Tag each item or package separately with identification related to ?nal hardware schedule. and include basic installation instructions with each item or package. Packaging of door hardware is responsibility of supplier. As material is received by hardware supplier from various manufacturers, sort and repackage in containers clearly marked with appropriate hardware set number to match set numbers of approved hardware schedule. Two or more identical sets may be packed in same container. Inventory door hardware jointly with representatives of hardware supplier and hardware installer until each is satis?ed that count is correct. Deliver individually packaged door hardware items to place of installation (shop or Project site). Provide secure lock-up for door hardware delivered to the Project. but not yet installed. Control handling and installation of hardWare items that are not immediately replaceable so that completion of the Work will not be delayed by hardware losses both before and after installation. JOB CONDITIONS Coordination: Coordinate hardware with other work. Tag each item or package separately, with identification related to the final hardware schedule, and include basic installation instruction in the package. Furnish hardware items of proper design for use on doors and frames of the thickness, profile, swing, security'and similar requirements indicated. as necessary for proper installation and function. Deliver individually packaged hardware items at the propertimes to theproper locations (shop or project area) for installation. Templates: Furnish hardware templates to each fabricator of doors, frames and other work to be factory-prepared for the installation of hardware. Upon request, check the shop drawings of such other work, to confirm that adequate provisions are made for the proper installation of hardware (especially as it relates to fire rating of door assemblies}. MAINTENANCE Maintenance Tools and Instructions: Furnish a complete set of specialized tools and maintenance instructions for Government's continued adjustment. maintenance. and removal and replacement of door hardware. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 SCHEDULED HARDWARE A. General Requirements: Requirements for design, grade, tunction, size and other distinctive qualities of each type of builder's hardware are indicated in the Hardware Schedule at the end of this speci?cation section. One or more manufacturers are listed for each hardware type required. The manufacturer listed below as "Basis of Design Manufacturer? indicates whose product designation is used in the Hardware Schedule for purpose of establishing minimum requirements. Provide either the product designated, or, where more than one manufacturer SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMADON (SEU) BUILDING INFORMATION coo P2009453 I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI - BUILDING INFORMATION Section 057'1 0-4 Door Hardware is listed. the comparable product of one of the other manufacturers which with the detailed requirements for each item including those speci?ed elsewhere in this section. Basis of Design Manufacturers: 1. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 19. Hinges [except continuous hinges): a. Referenced Manufacturer - Hager b. Approved Manufacturers - Stanley. McKinney. Lawrence Locks. Latch Sets and Deadlocks: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Sargent b. Approved Manufacturers no substitutions allowed Lock Cylinders: a. Referenced Manufacturer Sargent b. Approved Manufacturers - no substitutions allowed Exit Devices: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Von Duprin b. Approved Manufacturers no substitutions allowed Door Control Devices and Closers. Operators. Sentronic Closers, Wall Magnets: a. Referenced Manufacturer LCN Manufacturing b. Approved Manufacturers - no substitution allowed Push. Pull 8: Protective Plates, Wall 3: Floor Stops: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Rockwood b. Approved Manufacturers - Baldwin. Ives. Johnson Security Hardware: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Locknetics Security Engineering b. Approved Manufacturers - Von Duprin Silencers: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Rockwood b. Approved Manufacturers - Johnson. lves Door Seals (sound. light) and Astragals: a. Referenced Manufacturer - National Guard Products 13. Approved Manufacturers - Zero International. Pemko Electric Door Strikes: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Von Duprin. 13. Approved Manufacturers - Folger Adam Co. Continuous Hinges: a. Referenced Manufacturer Special Lite Approved Manufacturers Hager (Reich). Stanley. Select Products. Door Coordinators: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Johnson b. Approved Manufacturers - Rockwood. lves Flush Bolts: a. Referenced Manufacturer - lves b. Approved Manufacturers - Door Controls. Hager. Rockwood Lock Protectors: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Johnson b. Approved Manufacturers - Hagar. lves Pivots: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Rixson b. Approved Manufacturers - LCN. Ives Exit Alarms a. Referenced Manufacturer - Detox b. Approved Manufacturers Von Duprin. Locknetics. Door Control Monitor Switches a. Referenced Manufacturer - Sentrol b. Approved Manufacturers - no substitution allowed SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION ISBU) BUILDING INFORMATION . P2009453 ream? i. MODIFICATIONS I 2.02 SENSITIVE EIUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION Section 0871 0-5 Door Hardware C. Hardware Finishes 1. General: Provide matching finishes for hardware units at each door or opening, to the greatest extent possible, and except as otherwise indicated. Reduce differences in color and textures as much as commercially possible where the base metal or metai forming process is different for individual units of hardware exposed at the same door or opening. In general, match items to the manufacturer's standard finish or the latch and lock set (or push-pull units if no latch-lock sets) for color and texture. 2. Finish: Provide quality of finish, including thickness of plating or coating (if any), composition, hardness and other qualities complying with manufacturer?s standards, but in no case less than specified forthe applicable units of hardware by referenced standards. 3. Protective Coating: Provide protective lacquer coating on all exposed hardware ?nishes of bronze. 4- Finishes Designations: The designations used below to indicate hardware finishes are those listed in "Materials 3: Finishes Standard 1301" by BHMA, including coordination with the traditional U.S. ?nishes shown by certain manufacturers for their products. a. Hinges (Interior) E352 Satin Chromium Plated b. Pivots 626 Satin Chromium Plated c. Flush Bolts 625 Satin Chromium Plated d. Locks, Latches 6130 Satin Stainless Steel, Except Sargent 10 series shall be 26D, brushed chrome finish e. Exit Devices 626 Satin Chrome f. Door Closers-Surface 589 Aluminum Painted g. Door Closers-Concealed 626 Satin Chromium Plated h. Push Plates SSE: Satin Stainless Steel i. Pull Plates 630 Satin Stainless Steel 1. Protective Plates 6130 Satin Stainless Steel k. Lock Protectors 630 Satin Stainless Steel Door Stops 626 Satin Chromium Plated rn. Overhead Stops 526 Satin Stainless Steel n. Thresholds Weather-stripping Aluminum 0. Continuous Hinges (aluminum) 628 Aluminum p. Continuous Hinges (stainless) 630 Satin Stainless Steel MATERIALS AND FABRICATION A. Manufacturer's Name Plate: Do not use manufacturers' products that have manufacturer's name or trade name displayed in a visible location {omit removable nameplates) except in conjunction with required ?re?rated labels and as otherwise acceptable to Contracting Officer. Manufacturer?s identification will be permitted on rim of lock cylinders only. Hand of door: The drawings show the direction of slide. swing or hand of each door leaf. Furnish each item of hardware for proper installation and operation of the door movement as shown. . Base Metals: Produce hardware units of basic metal and forming method indicated, using manufacturer's standard metal alloy, composition, temper, and hardness, but in no case of lesser (commercially recognized) quality than specified for applicable hardware units by applicable ANSIIBHMA A156 series standards for each type of hardware item and with ANSIIBHMA A156.18 for finish designations indicated. Do not furnish "optional" materials or forming methods for those indicated. except as otherwise specified. . Fasteners: Manufacturers hardware to conform to published templates, generally prepared for machine screw installation. Do not provide hardware which has been prepared for self- tapping sheet metal screws. except as specifically indicated. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFOHMHTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION coc P2009453 Section I Dom Hardware 1. Screws: Furnish screws for installation, with each hardware item. Provide Phillips ?at- head screws except as otherwise indicated. Finish exposed (exposed under any condition) screws to match the hardware ?nish or. if exposed on surfaces of other work match that surface as closely as possible, including "prepared for paint? in surfaces to receive painted finish. 2. Concealed Fasteners: Provide concealed fasteners for hardware units which are exposed when the door is closed. except to the extent no standard units of the type specified are available with concealed fasteners. Do not use through bolts for installation where the bolt head or the nut on the opposite face is exposed in other work. exec-pt where it is not feasible to adequately reinforce the work. E. Tools for Maintenance: Furnish a complete set of specialized tools as needed for Government's continued adjustment. maintenance. and removal and replacement of builder's hardware. HINGES AND PIVOTS A. Templates: Except for hinges and pivots to be installed entirely (both leaves) into wood doors and frames. provide only template-produced units. B. Screws: Furnish Phillips flat-head sorews. Use all-purpose or machine screws for installation of units in hollow metal. Use wood screw for installation of units in wood. Finish screw heads to match surface of hinges or pivots. C. Hinge Pins: Except as otherwise indicated. provide hinge pins as follows: 1. Type: a. Steel Hinges: Steel pins b. Non-ferrous Hinges: Stainless steel pins 2. Interior Doors: Non-rising pins. 3. Tips: Flat button and matching plug. finished to match leaves. except where hospital tip indicated. 4. Lockable Door With Hinge On Key Side: Non-removable pins. D. Number of Hinges: Provide not less than 3 hinges for each door leaf for doors 90" or less in height and one additional hinge for each 30" of additional height. E. Sizes of Hinges: Provide 5" 4 1:2" for all doors over 30? (unless noted otherwise in schedule). LOCK CYLINDERS AND KEYING A. Review the keying system with the Government and provide the type required (master. grand master or great-grandmaster). All cylinders to be a restricted keyway. B. Equip locks with construction keying or construction cores for use during construction. Furnish only temporary inserts for the interchangeable core cylinders. remove these when directed. 1. Furnish ?nal cores and keys direct from the factory to the CDC locksmith as directed. C. Metals: Construct lock cylinder parts from brass or bronze. stainless steel. or nickel silver. D. Comply with Government's instructions for master-keying and. except as otherwise indicated. provide individual change key for each lock that is not designated to be keyed alike with a grOUp of related locks. 1. Permanently inscribe each key with number of lock that identi?es cylinder manufacturer's key symbol. and notation. NOT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) - BUILDING INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section 08?10?7 i HVADMQDIFICATIONS FORI. Door Hardware E. Key Material: Provide keys of nickel silver only. F. Key Quantity: Furnish 2 change keys for each keyset. 2 master keys for each master system. and 2 grandmaster keys for each grandmaster system. 1. Furnish 2000 extra blanks stamped NOT 2. Deliver keys to CDC locksmith as directed. 3. Provide 20 construction master keys. 4. Provide one copy of the factory cylinder bitting list shipped direct to the CDC locksmith. 2.05 LOCKS, LATCHES. AND BOLTS A. Strikes: Provide manufactu rer?s standard wrought box strike for each latch or look bolt. with curved lip extended to protect frame. ?nished to match hardware set. 1. Provide flat lip strikes for locks with 3-piece. anti-friction Iatchbolts as recommended by manufacturer. 2. Provide recess type top strikes for bolts looking into head frames. unless otherwise indicated. 3. Provide dust-proof strikes for foot bolts. except where special threshold construction provides non-recessed strike for bolt. B. Lock Throw:? Provide 31'4" minimum throw of latch and minimum throw of deadbolt used on pairs of doors. Comply with UL requirements for throw of bolts and latch bolts on rated fire openings. 1. Provide 'llZ?inch minimum throw on other latch and deadlock bolts. C. Flush Bolt Heads: Minimum of 1:2" diameter rods of brass. bronze. or stainless steel with minimum 12? long rod. D. Rabbeted Doors: Where rabbeted door stiles are indicated. provide special rabbeted front on lock and latch units and bolts. E. Exterior doors and interior doors with card readers: Lever handles for locksets. basis of specification is Sargent 8200 Mortise lever locks with rose and lever. Sargent KESO interchangeable core type cylinder. Handle to be solid stainless steel with 4 31'4" long grip. F. Interior doorswithout card readers: Cytindrical locksets. basis of speci?cation is Sargent 1i]- iine cylindrical lever locks with rose and lever. Sargent Restricted keyway. 2.06 leeniceas A. Provide 3 silencers for each single door. Provide 2 silencers for each pair of doors. Basis of specification is Ives SR 64. 2.0? UNITS A. Concealed Fasteners: Provide manufacturer's special concealed fastener system for installation. thru-bolted for matched pairs but not for single units. 2.08 CLOSERS AND DOOR CONTROL DEVICES A. Size of Units: Except as otherwise speci?cally indicated. comply with the manufacturer?s recommendations for size of door control unit depending on size of door. exposure to weather. and anticipated frequency of use. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION - BUILDING INFORMATION (b}[3}242 252mm} CDC P2009453 .. I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION Section 08710-6 Door Hardware B. Access-Free Manual Closers: Where manual closers are indicated for doors, provide adjustable units complying with the Georgia Accessibility Code Chapter 120-3-20) provisions for door opening force and delayed action closing. C. Closers to have full rack and pinion hydraulic operation with separate controls for closing and latching speeds. Closer to have high strength cast iron cylinder and all temperature ?uid. D. All manual door closers shall be codi?ed to exceed ten million (10.000.000} full load operating cycles by a recognized independent testing laboratory. Closers to be fully hydraulic. rack and pinion action with high strength cast iron cylinders and one piece forged steel pistons. Closer arms shall be forged steel (stamped steel arms are not acceptable). Hydraulic ?uid to be of a type requiring no seasonal adjustments for temperatures from 120 degrees (49 degrees C) to ~30 degrees (-35 degrees C). Pinion shaft to be a minimum diameter of 11116". Hydraulic regulation to be controlled by tamper-proof. non-critical screw valves, adjustable with a hex wrench. Separate adjustments for back check. general speed. and latch speed. Where detailed on double lever arm closers. provide a delayed action feature to delay closing up to one minute from maximum opening to approximately 75 degrees. Back check shall be properly located for protection of the door. frame and applied hardware. All closers shall be mounted with hex nuts and bolts. E- Power Operators: 1. Where low kinetic energy. as defined by ANSI Standard Al 56.19. power operators are indicated for doors required to be accessible to the disabled. provide electrically powered 9540 Series operators complying with the 1990 ADA for opening force and time to close standards. 2. Full closing force shall be provided when the power or assist cycle ends. 3. All power operator systems shall include the following features and functions. 3. b. f-h Provisions for separate conduits to carry high and low voltage wiring in compliance with the National Electrical Code. section T2541. When an obstruction or resistance to the opening swing is encountered. the operator will continue attempting to open the door. If the obstruction or resistance remains. the operator will again pause the door. The operator will be designed to prevent damage to the mechanism if the system is actuated while the door is latched or if the door is forced closed during the opening cycle. All covers. mounting plates and arm systems shall be powder coated and successfully pass a minimum of 100 hours testing as outlined in ANSI Standard Al56.18. UL listed for use on labeled doors. All operators shall be non-handed with spring power over a range of at least four sizes; either '1 through 4 or 2 through 5. Provisions in the control box or module shall provide control (inputs and outputs) for: electric strike delay. auxiliary contacts. sequential operation. fire alarms systems. actuators. swing side sensors. stop side sensors. 4. All electrically powered operators shall include the following features or functions: a. When an obstruction or resistance to the opening swing is encountered. the operator will pause at that point. then attempt to continue opening the door. if the obstruction or resistance remains. the operator will again pause the door. Easily accessible main power and maintain hold-open switches will be provided on the operator. An electronically controlled clutch to provide adjustable opening force. A microprocessor to control all motor and clutch functions. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION coo P2009453 . .HVAC MochloATI-oNs-Foal LUIIZE USC 2.09 2.010 2.011 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI BUILDING INFORMATION Section 08710?9 Door Hardware a. An on-board power supply capable of delivering both 121! and 24V outputs up to a maximum of 1.0 ampere combined load. f. All input and output power wiring shall be protected by slow blow fuses. These fuses shall be easily replaceable without special tools or component replacement. 5. Actuators shall be weather resistant and provide normally open momentary contacts. The actuator is designed to mount in a standard single gang box wide. 4" high. and 2" deep). EXIT DEVICES A. Provide low pro?le push pad mortise lock type devices with opposing lever handles. Basis for lever handle is Von Duprin Optional lever #03 In satin chrome. B. Exit Devices shall be listed for life safety. All exit devices for ?re rated openings shall have labels for "Fire Exit Hardware". C. All exit devices moonted on labeled wood doors shall be thru-bolted mounted on the door per the door manufacturers requirements. D. All trim shall be thru-bolted to the lock stile case. E. All exit devices shall incorporate a fluid damper. which decelerales the touchpad on its return stroke and eliminates noise associated with exit device operation. All exit devices shall be non-handed. Touchpad shall extend minimum of 1.2 of the door width and shall be a minimum height of 2 3H Plastic touchpads are not acceptable. All Iatchbolts shall be deadlocking type. Latchbolls shall have a self-lubricating coating to reduce wear. Plated or plastic coated latchbolts are not acceptable. F. Exit Device Dogging: Except on fire-rated doors, where closers are provided on doors equipped with exit devices. equip the units with keyed dogging device to keep the latch bolt . retracted, when engaged. DOOR TRIM UNITS A: Fasteners: Provide manufacturer's standard exposed fasteners for door trim units (kick plates, edge trim. viewers. knockers, mail drops and similar units) of either machine screws or self-tap ping screws. Edge trim: Fabricate edge trim of stainless, not more than 12?2" or less than ?16" smaller in length than door dimension. Protection Plates: Fabricate protection plates (armor. kick or mop) not more than 2? less than door width on singles and 1' less than door width on pairs by the height indicated. Install kick and armor plates to Hollow metal doors with Stainless Steel ?pop? rivets. See door elevations. Metal Plates: Stainless steel. US. 18 gauge {.050 inch). WEATHERSTRIPPING AND SEALS A. General: Provide smoke, light, or sound seals on interior doors where indicated or scheduled. Provide noncorrosive fasteners for exterior applications and elsewhere as indicated. Replaceable Seal Strips: Provide only' those units where resilient or ?exible seal strip is easin replaceable and readil:,l available from stocks maintained by manufacturer. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION CDC P2009453 (bil31242 262301} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION Section 0371040 Door Hardware 2.012 CONTINUOUS HINGES: A. Aluminum Continuous hinges to be manufactured of extruded SUBS-T6 aluminum alloy with anodized ?nish (painted gear cap only). 1. All hinges shall be manufactured to template. Uncut hinges shall be non-handed and shall be a pinless assembly of three interlocking extrusions applied to the full length of the door and frame without mortising. 2. Vertical door load shall be carried on chemically lubricated polyacaetal thrust bearings. The door and frame leaves shall be continuously geared together for the entire length and secured with a full cover channel. Hinge to operate to a full 180?. 3. Hinges to be milled. anodized and assembled in matching pairs. Fasteners supplied shall be 410 stainless steel, plated and hardened. 4. Where specified for use as UL rated doors. hinges shall bear UL label. UL rating shall be achieved without the use of mechanical pins or studs to pin the hinge leaves together in a fire condition. B. Stainless steel continuous hinges shall be as scheduled. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 INSTALLATION A. Mount hardware units at heights indicated in following applicable publications, except as speci?cally indicated or required to comply with governing regulations and except as otherwise directed by the Contracting Of?cer. Mount looks at heights indicated in hardware sets. 1. "Recommended Locations for Builders Hardware for Standard Steel Doors and Frames" by the Door and Hardware Institute. 2. "Recommended Locations for Builders Hardware for Custom Steel Doors and Frames" by the Door and Hardware institute. B. Install each hardware item in compliance with the manufacturer's instructions and recommendations. Where cutting and fitting is required to install hardware onto or into surfaces that are later to be painted or ?nished in another way. coordinate removal. storage. and reinstallation or application of surface protection with finishing work speci?ed in the Division 9 Sections. Do not install surface-mounted items until finishes have been completed on the substrates involved. Do not Thru-bolt door closers or exit devices unless required by the door manufacturer. Coordinate with the wood door speci?cations. C. Set units level. plumb. and true to line and location. Adjust and reinforce the attachment substrate as necessary for proper installation and operation. D. Drill and countersink units that are not factory prepared for anchorage fasteners. Space fasteners and anchors in accordance with industry standards. Install Armor, Kick and Mop plates to hollow metal doors with Stainless steel "pop" rivets. E. Weatherstripping and Seals: Comply with manufacturer's instructions and recommendations to the extent installation requirements are not otherwise indicated. F. There shall be a meeting before any materials are released for shipment to coordinate all electrical hardware items with the hollow metal supplier. installer, electrical and security contractors. The finish hardware supplier shall provide point to point riser diagrams showing all electrical hardware items. The hardware submittal shall indicate the function of each opening with electric hardware. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION - BUILDING INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI BUILDING INFORMATION .- CDC P2009453 Section osr1o11 - - Door Hardware 3.02 ADJUSTING, CLEANING, AND DEMONSTRATING A. Adjust and check each operating item of hardware and each doorto ensure proper operation or function of every unit. Replace units that cannot be adjusted to operate freer and smootth or as intended for the application made. 1. Where door hardware is installed more than one month prior to acceptance or occupancy of a space or area, return to the installation during the week prior to acceptance or occupancy and make final check and adjustment of all hardware items in such space or area. Clean operating items as necessary to restore proper function and finish of hardware and doors. Adjust door control devices to compensate for ?nal operation of heating. ventilating and air conditioning equipment B. Clean adjacent surfaces soiled by hardware installation. Remove all temporary labels, construction marks soil from door hardware, C. instruct Government's personnel in the proper adjustment and maintenance of door hardware and hardware finishes. D. Six-Month Adjustment: Approximately six months after the date of Substantial Compietion, the Installer, accompanied by representatives of the manufacturers of iatchsets and locksets and of door control devices, and of other major hardware suppliers, shall return to the Project to perform the following work: 1. Examine and re-adjust each item of door hardware as necessary to restore function of doors and hardware to comply with speci?ed requirements. 2. Consult with and instruct Government's personnel in recommended additions to the maintenance procedures. 3. Replace hardware items that have deteriorated or failed due to faulty design, materialsI or installation of hardware units. 4. Prepare a written report of current and predictable problems (of substantial nature) in the performance of the hardware. PART 4 - SCHEDULES 4.01 HARDWARE SCHEDULE ibitE?ui 42 LI :3 C. 2525?, . . . .. . Hardware Set't :Do'o'r" 1 Continuous hinge SPECIAL LITE - SECURITY CAP 5 Deadlock SARGENT - 437'5 i 1 Pull ROCKWOOD - 90 1 Push Plate ROCKWOOD - 1 Flush Pull SPECIAL LITE - SL84 1 Power Operator LCN - 9540 1 Header Safety Sensor LCN - 2 Actuator LCN - 8310-813 I 1 Armor plate 36? high, 2" less than door width. Mount above door bottom sea! on push side of door. 1 Mop plate 39" high, 1" less than door width. 1 Door bottom seal NATIONAL GUARD PRODUCTS - ZZUNA END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION user; 2623131} I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED Section 09?21-1 MMA Flooring CDC P2009453 SECTION 09721 METHYL METHACRYLATE (MMA) ACRYLIC FLOORING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. Scarification of existing floor coatings and patching of designated floor areas. as required. B. Metth Methacrvlate (MMA) Acrylic flooring and integral cove. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01300 - Submitters Section 01546 Heaitn and Safety C. Section 01700 Contract Ctoseouf D. Section 04810? Unit Masonry Assembiies E. Section 0?900 Joint Seaiers F. Section 09900 Paints and Coatings 1.3 A. Submit under provisions of Section 01300. B. Product Data: Provide complete information and description of methods. procedures and tools to be used when scarifying the topping on the existing floor. Provide data for the MMA flooring system. describing physiCal and performance characteristics; sizes. patterns. textures and colors available. Include certi?cation indicating compliance of materials with requirements. C. Manufacturer's Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for each respective product proposed for use. D. Maintenance and Cleaning Information: Provide four copies of maintenance schedule. cleaning materials and procedures for flooring maintenance and cleaning. E. Samples: Submit two samples. 12" 12" in size applied to hardboard or similar backing for rigidity. illustrating color. texture and pattern for each color speci?ed. F. Manufacturers installation Instructions: indicate special procedures, base conditions. location and type of control joints. and other components requiring Special attention. (3. Installation Certification. Scari?cation of the existing topping and installation of the MMA flooring shalt be performed by the manufacturer or manufacturer?s agent. hereafter called the Installer. 1. Written certi?cation from a representative of the manufacturer or Installer shall be provided to SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED CDC P2009453 Foal I Illil'f? :12 UE 25231?? SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 09721-2 MMA Flooring the Contracting Of?cer stating that staff of the manufacturer or Installer has installed similar MMA flooring systems for at least ?ve years. 2. The following manufacturer's letters of acceptance shall be required. H. Manufacturer's Letters of Acceptance: Provide three letters of acceptance during the work of this J. section. They shall be written and received within 24 hours of completion of each of the following events: 1. Upon review of the following items: all surfaces to be scari?ed. the removal techniques proposed by the Installer. all coved conditions. relative vertical height of surfaces to receive flooring. all other conditions important to the proper preparation and installation of the MMA ?oonng. 2. Upon completion of the scarification of the existing flooring that all substrates and conditions are acceptable and shall provide a satisfactory surface for the installation of the MMA flooring systems as required by these documents. 3. Upon completion of the application of the MMA ?ooring system. If a substrate or condition is not acceptable to the manufacturer, the manufacturer shall document discrepancies and provide copies to the Contracting Officer and Installer. The Installer shall remedy all de?ciencies and work shall not commence on the next phase of the flooring system until the manufacturer has provided the Contracting Officer with the appropriate Letter of Acceptance. Maintenance Recommendations: Include maintenance procedures. recommended maintenance materials. procedures for stain removal. repairing surface. and suggested schedule for cleaning. Submit U.S.D.A. approval of the MMA flooring system used. . 1.4 QUALIFICATIONS A. Manufacturer: Company specializing in manufacturing the MMA flooring systems speci?ed in this section with minimum three years documented experience. All MMA flooring components shall be provided by a single manufacturer. Installer: Company specializing in performing the work of this section with minimum ?ve years documented experience. approved and trained by manufacturer for MMA flooring systems as speci?ed for this project. The Installer shall have satisfactorily completed ten projects installing same manufacturer's identical MMA flooring systems of similar or greater size as this project within the last three years. Project Managen'Field Sopervisor: Trained by product manufacturer. under direct full time supervision of manufacturer?s own or plant trained foreman. The Project ManageriField Supervisor shall have a minimum of two years experience as a field supervisor and shall have satisfactorin completed five projects installing same manufacturer's MMA flooring systems of similar size as required for this project within the last years. The Project ManagerrField Supervisor shall be full time on this project during all phases of operation of the coating operations. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2003453 Section 09721-3 33.52312 - I MMA Flooring D. Installation Staff: All members of the installation staff shall have experience installing MMA flooring systems of similar type and size as required for this project. Written confirmation of all requirements may be requested by the Contracting Of?cer prior to commencement of the work. 1.5 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS A. The Work under this section shall be in a con?ned and highly specialized space. Animals shall be present in areas adjacent to the work space. To minimize the effects of the work on these laboratory animals the requirements of these documents shall restrict the creation of airborne particulates and aerosols to minimum levels outside the Work area. The Work area shall be segregated from all other portions of the building and the exterior. Minimum requirements shall include. but not be limited to. the following: 1. The Contractor shall provide 48 hour notice to the Contracting Of?cer prior to installation of any flooring materials. 2. Operation of the building's mechanical supply and exhaust systems in the Work area affects other critical portions of the animal care area. Thus. great care shall be taken to minimize any odors and particulate matter from entering the supply air stream. a. The animal care rooms are negative in relation to the corridor. That is. air flows from the corridor into each animal care space. 3. The Contractor shall provide a plan of mitigation to the Contracting Of?cer when potentially high particulate. aerosols. or fumes entrainment in the air is anticipated. The type airborne entrainment and the methods of mitigation shall be provided by the Contractor prior to the Notice to Proceed. a. No work shall commence until the plan of mitigation has been reviewed and accepted by the Contracting Officer. 4. Methods of mitigation may include. but not be limited to. portable fans and ?exible ducts to exterior of building. and barriers between work area and occupied spaces of building. 5. Measurement devices may be utilized by the Government in adjacent spaces to insure that no fumes or emissions migrate from the Work area into adjacent spaces. 6. Refer to Section 01548 for complete health and safety and environmental requirements. 1.6 JOB CONDITIONS A. General. CDC has no provision to offload Contractor deliveries. Contractor staff shall be on site when all deliveries are made. CDC will provide information as to when and where offloading may take place. Deliver materials in original containers with labels and seals intact. Conform to manufacturer's recommendations. including storage temperatures. precautions and protective measures. Store materials in dry protected area between 25? and 80? F. Keep out of direct sunlight. Protect from open ?ame and keep all containers grounded. 1. Prior to storing any materials on site. request permission from Contracting Of?cer. Location and length of time available for storage will be provided. Provide adequate controlled forced ventilation and uniform bright light. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ mild-.42 USE 252mb" HvAc .. I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 09721-4 MMA Flooring CDC P2009453 E. Material, air. and surface temperatures shall be between 25? and 35" during application and cure. Relative humidity in the work area shall be less than 85% and the surface temperature shall be at least 5El above the dew point. F. Existing concrete floors: After scarification of existing flooring. clean exposed surface with solutions recommended by manufacturer. Contractor. Contracting Of?cer. and others as appropriate, shall visually inspect entire surface of floor after scari?cation for cracks and other de?ciencies. Contractor shall recommend whether crack repairs or other remedial actions are required after the visual inspection to Contracting Of?cer. G. New concrete floors: New concrete slabs shall have the following characteristics: 1- Concrete shall be moisture cured for a minimum of seven days at TOUF. 2. The concrete shalI be fully cured for a minimum of 28 days prior to application of the coating system pending moisture test. 3. Surface contaminants. including but not limited to. curing agents. membranes. or other bond breakers shall not be Used. 4. Concrete shall have a rubbed finish. float or derby ?nish the concrete. Do not use a hard steel trowel. 5. Set drains to the top of concrete grade. not the finished grade of the topping. 6. Concrete shall have a moisture emission rate of ?ve pounds or less per 1000 square feet per 24 hour period as determined by proper Calcium Chloride Testing. 7. Vapor barriers andfor suitable means shall be installed beneath slab on grades to prevent vapor transmission through the slab. H. Protect adjacent surfaces from soil or damage. Do not allow traffic over coatings until fully cured. Post signs while work is in progress and while it is curing. Maintain area free of dust and other contaminants during application and until coatings are tullyr cured. I. Cove Base. Provide a 4 inch high cove base the same thickness as the ?oor on all existing intersections of walls and horizontal surfaces. including floors and poured curbs. 1. Zinc angle. Provide a 1! 1! zinc angle at the top of the caved base with sealant as detailed on the Contract Drawings. 2. The sealant shall be tooled with approved tooling device in accordance with manufacturer's printed instructions and recommendations. WARRANTY A. Provide ?ve year warranty tinder provisions of Section 01700. 1. Warranty: Include coverage against flooring delamination from substrate. separation of floor and base. and degradation of surface ?nish. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 BASIS OF DESIGN A. General Description: The basis of design for the MMA flooring system is the Res-Tek RT 8058f. MMA Reactive Acrylic Flake Flooring System. B. The components of the MMA flooring system include the following. The basis of design for each SENSITIVE EIUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION coc P2009453 I U.S.C. 2523(0) .. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section cam-5 MMA Flooring is the Res-Tek product number. 74.03?" PenetratinglReinforcing Primer: RT 710 with Comp. Coving: RTBOSwlappropriate RT ?ller RT 05 Resin. Filler PC Body Coat: RT305 Self Leveling {consists of Res-Tel: 805 resin and RT Filler SL waolored Flake broadcast) Top Coatts): RT925 Sealer Resin Initiator Res-Tait Powder Hardener Skid Resistance Bleached aluminum oxide broadcast into primer or body coat resin. 2.2 POLYMER CONCRETE TOPPING PATCH A. General Description: The polymer concrete topping shall be used to infill existing concrete flooring in the areas as designated on the contract drawings. 2.3 MMA FLOORING A. The body coat of the MMA flooring system shall be 1i'3" thick RT805 resin and Res-Tek Filler SL with the color and texture as selected from standard manufacturer's color samples. B. General characteristics of the MMA flooring shall include, but not be limited to. the following: 1 . 2. 3. 4. The topping system shall cure and be available to normal traf?c in no more than one hour at 63? after application of last coat. The cured material shall have a minimum compressive strength of 72000 psi in accordance with ASTM C109. The cured material shall have a maximum water absorption value of 0.04 weight percent in accordance with ASTM 0570. The cured material shall be chemically resistant to a wide range of acids. alkalis. salts, and other similar materials. (3. The ?nished flooring system shall be uniform in color. texture. and appearance. All edges that laminate at walls. ?oor discontinuities. and other embedded items shall be sharp. uniform, and cosmetically acceptable with no thick or ragged edge. The Contractor shall work out an acceptable masking technique to ensure the acceptable ?nish of all edges. D. Provide textured non-slip surface as selected and approved by Contracting Of?cer for the MMA ?oonng. 2.4 PERFORMANCE PROPERTIES OF MMA FLOORING SYSTEM COMPONENTS A. Component: Primer. Basis of Design: Res-Tek T10. The product performance Criteria for the primer are as follows? Property Value Percentage of Reactive Resin 100% Percentage Solids 100% Water Absorption. Wt. ?fa ASTM 0570 Less than 0.6 Tensile Strength. psi ASTM 0633 3550 Tensile Modulus. psi ASTM 0638 230.000 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ I :13 US I: I: ZGEsrn. CDC P2009453 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ Section 097?21-6 HVAC MO DIFICATI 0N8. FOR. . Coef?cient of Thermal Expansion, infinng ASTM oess Electrical Resistivity Volume Resistance, ohm-cm ASTM 025? Surface Resistance, ohm ASTM 025? Water Vapor Transmission glcm-hr-mm Hg 10?9 DIN 53122 Component: Polymer Concrete Resin MMA Flooring .1015 to? 1.4 Basis of Design: Res-Tek 05 Polymer Concrete Resin, The performance criteria for the cured polymer concrete are as follows: Progeny Percentage of Reactive Resin Water Absorption, Wt tit: ASTM DSTD Tensile Strength, psi ASTM 0638 Tensile Modulus, psi 1: 105 ASTM 0636 Coefficient of Thermal Expansion, inrinr?F ASTM Compressive Strength. ASTM C339 ASTM 0109 Component: Resin Value 100% .02 1200 1.2 .000018 7.800 9.200 Basis of Design: Res-Tel: 805 SL Resin. The performance criteria for the resin are as follows: Progeny Test Percentage of Reactive Resin Percentage of Solids Water Absorption, Wt% ASTM osro Compressive Strength. psi ASTM 0109 STM 0595 Tensile Strength, psi STM 0638 Tensile Modulus, psi ASTM 0633 Flexural Strength, psi ASTM 0790 Coef?cient of Thermal Expansron. inrinPF ASTM Electrical Resistivity ASTM 0257 Volume Resistance, ohm-cm Chemical Resistance ASTM 0543 Effect of Week Acids Effect of Strong Acids Effect of Alkalis Effect of Salt Solutions Effect of Oil, Grease Effect of Sunlight (UV Radiation) Component: Sealer Resin Value 100% 100% .04 6.000 1.950 230.000 3.500 10?? None Slight None None None None Basis of Design: Res?Tek 925 Sealer Resin. The performance criteria for the sealer resin are as follows: SENSITIVE EUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC $009453 Section 097'214 HVAC MODIFICATIONS FOR I ?new u.s.c.s2e2a_rm I MMA Flooring Property Value Percentage of Reactive Resin 100% Percentage of Solids 100% Water Absorption, Wt% ASTM E1570 .0.5 Tensile Strength, psi ASTM 0633 3.850 Tensile Modulus, psi ASTM 0638 470.000 Compressive Strength. psi ASTM C109 6000-3000 ASTM 0595 6.000 Coef?cient of Thermal Expansion. iniinFF ASTM .oocoss Electrical Resistivity ASTM 025? Volume Resistance. ohm-cm ?5 Surface Resistance. ohm-cm Water Vapor Transmission icm-hr-mm Hg 10'? DIN 53122 1.43 Chemical Resistance ASTM 0543 Effect of Week Acids None Effect of Strong Acids Slight Effect of Alkalis None Effect of Salt Solutions None Effect of Oil. Grease None Effect of Sunlight (UV Radiation) None Basis of Design: Res~Tek MMA Flooring System. The following criteria for all components of the E. Product Installation and Application Criteria. MMA flooring system are as follows: I Pot Life at 15?20 Minutes Cure Time at 60 Minutes Recoat Time at 60-90 Minutes 2.5 ACCESSORIES A. Treatment for Structural Cracks: Manufacturers recommended product and installation method. 2.6 FLOOR COLOR A. The color will be selected by the Contracting Of?cer from the color samples of all the manufacturer's standard colors provided by Contractor. 1. Field veri?cation of color by Contracting Of?cer required prior to commencement of work. 2. Existing MMA flooring coloring is based on the following mix design: a. MMA-1: 45% CF-1 15% CF-13 10% CF-2 10% CF-S 15% (SF-9 5% 9 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 HVAC MODIFICATIONS FOR SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section csr21-s MMA Flooring PART 3 EXECUTION .31 EXAMINATION A. Review site conditions prior to scarification of existing epoxy topping and removal of coating on curbing to determine proper selection of tools and other devices used in the scarificatlon and removal from the respective surfaces. Prior to commencing coatings work, measure surfaces and. as necessary. install sub-floor ?ller recommended by manufacturer to insure that all surfaces are smooth and slope as shown by contract documents, and are ready to receive work. 1. Measure moisture content of surfaces. a. Concrete shall have a moisture emission rate of no more than five pounds per 1.000 square feet per 24 hour period as determined by proper Calcium Chloride Testing. Verify floor and curb surfaces are free of substances or conditions that may impair adhesion of any component of the flooring system. Do not proceed with installation of flooring system until unsuitable or defective work or conditions have been resolved and acceptable to the Contracting Officer. manufacturer and Installer. 3.2 PREPARATION A. Concrete substrate shall be clean and dry. Dislodge dirt. mortar splatter. paint overspray. and other dry surface accumulations and contamination by scraping brushing. sweeping. vacuuming. andfor compressed air lowdown. Surfaces that are heavin contaminated shall be cleaned with the appropriate degreaser. detergent. or other appropriate cleanerfsurfactant followed by thoroughly rinsing with fresh water to remove the accumulation prior to mechanical cleaning efforts. Mechanical Surface Preparation and Cleaning. All accessible concrete ?oor surfaces shall be mechanically blast cleaned using a mobile steelshot. dust recycling machine. The basis of design is BLASTRAG. manufactured by Wheelabrator Corporation. All surface and embedded accumulations of paint. toppings. hardened concrete layers. laitance. power trowel finishes. and other similar surface characteristics shall be completed removed leaving a bare concrete surface having a profile similar to 40 grit sandpaper and exposing the upper fascia of concrete aggregate. Floor areas inaccessible to the mobile blast cleaning machines shall be mechanically abraded to the same degree of cleanliness. soundness. and profile using vertical disc scarifiers. staiwheel scari?ers. needle guns. scabblers. or other suitany effective equipment. 2. After blasting. traces or accumulations of spent abrasive. laitance. removed toppings. and other debris shall be removed with brush or vacuum. 3- Conduct Bond Tests to check adequacy of surface preparation. 4. Application of the speci?ed floor system shall be completed before any water or other contamination of the surface occurs. The selected removal process shall be able to loosen topping that otherwise appears bonded to the existing substrate without causing cracks or other de?ciencies in the concrete substrate. 1. Repair of cracks. rUpture of the existing membrane waterproofing. and other deficiencies SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 - I [bilf31242 U.S.C. 2623lh} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED Section 09721-9 MMA Flooring caused by faulty or de?cient workmanship. use of improper tools. the improper operation of any tools. or any other installation related circumstance. shall be repaired by the Contractor at no additional cost to the Government. After scarification of all existing flooring surface and the curbing. remove ridges and bumps. Fill low spots. cracks. joints. holes. and other defects with manufacturer?s recommended sub-floor filler. Clean concrete substrate according to manufacturer?s recommendations prior to installation of any component of the MMA flooring system. Apply. trowel. and float ?ller to achieve smooth. flat. hard surface. Grind or othenrrise remove irregularities above the surface level. Prohibit construction traf?c until filler is cured. Vacuum clean substrate. Bond test. The following bond test shall be conducted to determine the adequacy of surface preparation and bond. The bond test shall be accomplished as follows. 1. Mix six ounces of the primer to be used in the application with #1 04:12 mesh. dry quartz sand until an easily trowelable consistency is obtained. Add 10% by volume Res-Tek Powder Hardener and mix well. 2. Apply to properly prepared substrate in palm size patties. 1f to 1! thick at various locations in the area receive the topping. The patties shall be cured tack free. approximately one hour (at and cooled to ambient temperature of concrete. 3. Remove the petty samples with hammer and chisel. 4. Examine the fracturerdelamination plane of the samples. The sample shall have concrete with fractured aggregate attached to the entire underside of the sample to pass the test. a. If the sample only has laitance. fines. or a small amount of concrete attached. or if the interface between patty and substrate is tacky. additional substrate preparation shall be required and retested until the test is successfully passed. 3.3 INSTALLATION A. Installation of MMA flooring system shall conform to latest manufacturer's instructions to produce a uniform monolithic wearing surface of thickness speci?ed. All installation instructions. products. mixing ratios. spread rate. and other manufacturer's recommendations and requirements are based on the basis of design MMA flooring system. For other products. use the manufacturer's latest written recommendations and speci?cations for the appropriate installation instruction. The application of the RT 305 SL Colored Flake Flooring System. the basis of design for the MMA flooring system. shall be as fotlows: 1. Apply the primerisealer Apply coving. Perform patching and sloping with RT-05 PC. Re-prime areas patched or sloped. Apply slurry of Resin and Res-Tel: Filler SL. Apply Mo topcoat(s). eweww Open only the containers of component materials to be used in each speci?c application as needed. Refer to Manufacturer?s data sheets for pot lifei'temperature relationship to determine SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 Section 09721-10 rinsing?? . . I size of batches to mix and mix ratios for each representative coat of the system. D. Measure. add. and mix the initiator into the respective resin components in the proportions recommended by the material manufacturer. Mix only as much material at a time as can be easily and efficiently applied due to the short pot life ofthe material. E. Application of the System. 1. Prime Coat. Measure, add, and mix the resin component and the initiator into the primer in the proportions recommended by the material manufacturer. a. Pour the mixture batches onto the floor surface and use a 9" or 18" wide, is" to St thick- napped, solvent-resistant paint roller to roll out the material at a rate of 100 square feet per gallon to form a uniform and continuous film. Ensure that all crevices, cracks, and other surface discontinuities have been saturated and coated. Use a paint brush to reach areas inaccessible to the roller. Do not leave any puddles; roll out any such accumulations. b. Allow the primerrsealer to cure. c. If any of the concrete has absorbed all of the primer or if the concrete still has a dry look, reprime these areas before applying wear coat or topcoat. 2. Owing. Surface Preparation: if concrete walls are to be painted prior to installation of cove base, the bottom portion of the walls shall remain uncoated to the height of the cove base to insure a proper bond to the concrete wall. a. If walls are constructed of a non-compatible material or if a coating exists, a backer board of 1! Plexiglas or cement board cut to the desired height of the cove base shall be installed. The top of the back board shall be cut at a 45? angle to create a beveled edge. b. The backer board shall be fastened using a high grade construction adhesive and countersunk screws or concrete masonry anchors. c. The cove base shall be installed according to the manufacturer's recommendations and shall be one of the following basis of design systems: (1) Trowei-On Cove Base consisting of a trowel applied radiusfbase mix with a termination strip installed at the top of the base. d. The cove base shall receive a broadcast and top coatts) consistent with the flooring system. 3. PatchinngIOping. Measure, add, and mix the RT-05 Resin, filler PC, and necessary aggregate {if required} In the proportions recommended by the material manufacturer. Use mixture to repair any damaged concrete. or to slope any areas as needed. a. Once cured. material shall be re-primed before topping system is applied. 4. Topping. Size the batches and mix according to manufacturefs instructions. The entire batch should be poured and spread at once. Do not let material remain in pail. a Spread the topping material with a gauge rake set to a depth of 1rd". trowel to a uniform thickness of ti as necessary. b. Immediately after application. roll with a porcupine roller available from the manufacturer to release any trapped air from the topping. c. Broadcast Colored Flakes at a rate of 0.10 to 0.15 pounds per square foot into the fresh material before it begins to cure. It is important that the flake rain down, and not be thrown into, the surface. d. Allow topping to cure. e. Remove excess flakes by sweeping, blow down, andfor vacuuming. abrade surface to remove loosely bonded Colored Flake with a medium stiff brush on a swing style floor machine or abrade using medium coarse fiber pad, or stiff bristle push broom. Vacuum prior to next step- SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) (b}(3}142 use. EBEathl F. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) co P2009453 Section 09721-11 MMA Flooring 5. Top Coat. Apply with clean rollers at a rate of 100 to 125 square feet per gallon in the same way as the primerrsealer. a. Broadcast aluminum oxide. glass beads, or other suitable material into wet topcoat resin. The size and rate to be determined by the Contracting Officer. b. Allow top coat to cure. 6. Second Top Coat. Apply with clean rollers at a rate of 100 to 125 square feet per gallon in the same way as the primerlsealer a. Allow top coat to cure. Cleaning. Installer shall remove any material splatters and other material that is not where it should be. Remove masking and covers. taking care not to contaminate surrounding area. The Installer shall repair any damage from either the application or clean up efforts. Floor Accessories: Material around the perimeter of all floor drain. cleanout. and other similar item's frames shall be removed to allow the MMA flooring system to key into the void. The flooring materials shall not block the drain grate or other device from being removed in the future. Ridges and Birdbaths: The existing floors are relatively level and no change in the elevations of the ?oor is contemplated at this time. After the topping and primer coats have been installed. the entire floor area shall be water tested to assure adequate drainage to floor drains shown on the drawings. All areas of the flooring shall pass water test prior to the application of the Top Coatts). If an area is not allowing water to flow as designed. it shall be corrected by the Installer until the water ?ows as intended. 3.4 PROTECTION OF FINISHED WORK A. Cure MMA flooring materials in compliance with manufacturer?s directions and the requirements of these documents. taking care to prevent contamination during stages of application and prior to completion of the curing process. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Ih?f 262th- CDG P2009453 HMAQMQDIFJCATIQNS .. I SENSITIVE IBUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEUI Section Paints and Coatings PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 ?1 .05 SECTION INCLUDES A. Surface preparation. B. Field application of paints. stains, varnishes, and other coatings. C. See Schedule - Surfaces to be Finished. at end of Section. RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 04810? Unit Masonry Assemblies. B. Section Joint Seaiers C. Section 081' 15 Standard Sieei Frames. REFERENCES A. ASTM 15 - Standard Terminology for Paint. Coatings. Materials. and Applications. B- ASTM 4442 - Standard Test Methods for Direct Moisture Content Measurement of Wood and Wood-Base Materials. C. NACE (IMP) - Industrial Maintenance Painting; MACE International. D. SSPC (PM1) - Steel Structures Painting Manual, Vol. 1. Good Painting Practice: Society for Protective Coatings. E. SSPC (PM2) - Steel Structures Painting Manual. Vol. 2, Systems and Specifications; Society for Protective Coatings. DEFINITIONS A. Conform to ASTM 16 for interpretation of terms used in this section. SUBMITTALS A. See Section 01300 - Administrative Requirements, for submittal procedures B. Product Data: Provide data on all finishing products. Describe the following: Vehicle type. Percent solids by volume. Method of application. Rate of coverage and dry film thickness for each coat. Instructions for substrate preparation including priming. Recommended ambient temperature and relative humidity range. substrate temperature. moisture content and alkalinity at time of application. Recommendations which differ from specified requirements. SENSITIVE EIUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBLII SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) uses CDC P2009453 Section peace?2 C. Color Samples: Submit two paper chip samples. 3 3 inch in size illustrating range of colors and textures available for each surface finishing product scheduled. D. Brush-out Samples: Submit two painted samples. illustrating selected colors and textures for each color and system selected with specified coats cascaded. Submit on tempered hardboard. 12 x12 inch in size. E. Manufacturer's Instructions: Indicate special surface preparation procedures. F. Maintenance Data: Submit date on cleaning. touch-Up. and repair of painted and coated surfaces. G- lnformationalSubmittals; 1. Certi?cates andlor test reports showing that products meet speci?ed regulatory requirements. 2. Statement of applicator quali?cations. 1.06 QUALITYASSURANCE A. Manufacturer Qualifications: Company specializing in manufacturing the Products specified in this section with minimum three years documented experience. B. Applicator Qualifications: Company specializing in performing the work of this section with minimum 5 years experience. 0. Products shall meet UL ?ame spread 0; fuel contributed 5; smoke developed 15. per ASTM E34. 1.07 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS A. Conform to applicable code for flame and smoke rating requirements for products and ?nishes. B. Products shall meet the National Architectural and industrial Maintenance Paints and Coatings (AIM) Rule and local State VOC regulations. 1.03 DELIVERY. STORAGE. AND PROTECTION A. Deliver products to site in sealed and labeled containers; inspect to verify acceptability. B. Container Label: include manufacturer?s name. type of paint. brand name. lot number. brand code. coverage. surface preparation. drying time, cleanup requirements. color designation. and instructions for mixing and reducing. C. Paint Materials: Store at minimum ambient temperature of 45 degrees and a maximum of 90 degrees F. in ventilated area. and as required by manufacturer's instructions. 1.09 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS A. Do not apply materials when surface and ambient temperatures are outside the temperature ranges required by the paint product manufacturer. B. Minimum Application Temperatures for Latex Paints: 45 degrees for interiors; 50 degrees for exterior; unless required otherwise by manufacturer's instructions. C. Minimum Application Temperature for lu'arnish Finishes: 65 degrees for interior or exterior. SENSITNE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (soul coc P2009453 MODIFICATIONS ma] I ltJl-iS 43 US I: 1.10 D. E. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 09900-3 Paints and Coatings unless required otherwise by manufacturer?s instruotions. Provide lighting level of 30 ft candles measured mid-height at substrate surface. Do not apply coatings in areas where dust is being generated. EXTRA MATERIALS A. B. See Section 017'00 - Product Requirements. for additional provisions. Supply full containers of paints and ?nishes in sealed one gallon cans of each color; store where directed. Provide the following quantities: 1. Colors using 1 to 19 gallons: One gallon. 2. Colors using 20 to 49 gallons: Two gallons. 3. Colors using 50 gallons or more: Five gallons. Label each container with color in addition to the manufacturer's label. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 OF DESIGN MANUFACTURERS A. B. Epoxy Filler: Sherwin Williams 00.. Kern Call-Coat HS Epoxy Paint: Shenvin?Williams Co. Tile-Clad HS PAINTS AND COATINGS - GENERAL A. Coatings shall have good flow and application properties; capable of drying or curing free of streaks or sags. B. Materials for each application shall be compatible with one another and with other materials with which they mayr come in contact. C. Provide accessory materials as recommended by coating manufacturer. whether or not specified. as required to achieve specified finishes. D. Gloss Ranges; ASTM D523: Paint Type Test Method Gloss Range Flat 85 degree meter Below 15 Eggshell 60 degree meter 5 to 20 Satin 60 degree meter ?15 to 35 Semi-Gloss 60 degree meter 30 to 65 Gloss 60 degree meter Over 65 COLORS A. All colors are to match existing adjacent surface finishes. B. A designated color may be required in one or more types and gloss. depending upon point system speci?ed for each specific surface. C. Matching colors shall be exact. Manufacturer's nearest standard color will not be acceptable. ACCESSORY MATERIALS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 09900-4 lb}i3i'42 US 252mb;- A. anc I Paints and Coatings Accessory Materials: Linseed oil, shellac, turpentine, paint thinners and other materials not speci?cally indicated but required to achieve the finishes specified; commercial quality. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 A. B. 3.02 A. B. EXAMINATION Verify that surfaces are ready to receive Work as instructed by the product manufacturer. Examine surfaces scheduled to be finished prior to commencement of work. Report any condition that may potentially affect proper application. Test shop-applied primer for compatibility with subsequent cover materials. Measure moisture content of surfaces using an electronic moisture meter. Do not apply finishes unless moisture content of surfaces are below the following maximumsI with negative alkalinity: 1. Plaster and Gypsum Wallboard: 12 percent. 2. Masonry, Concrete. and Concrete Unit Masonry: 12 percent. 3. Concrete Floors: Bpercent. PREPARATION Broom clean Surface Appurtenances: Remove electrical plates. hardware. light fixture trim, escutcheons. and fittings prior to preparing surfaces or ?nishing. Surfaces: Correct defects and clean surfaces which affect work of this section. Remove or repair existing coatings that exhibit surface defects. Mask as necessary to achieve a neat finish painting edge next to dissimilar surfaces. Furnish drop cloths. shields. and protective methods to prevent spray or droppings from dis?guring other surfaces. Post signs. Close off neWIy painted areas where possible. Remove signs when paint has dried. Marks: Sea] with shellac those which may bleed through surface finishes. lmpervious Surfaces: Remove mildew by scrubbing with solution of tetra-sodium phosphate and bleach. Rinse with clean water and allow surface to dry. Concrete and Unit Masonry Surfaces to be Painted: Remove dirt. loose mortar. scale. salt or alkali powder. and other foreign matter. Remove oil and grease with a solution of tri?sodium phosphate; rinse well and allow to dry. Remove stains caused by weathering of corroding metals with a solution of sodium metasilicate after thoroughly wetting with water. Allow to dry. Gypsum Board Surfaces to be Painted: Fill minor defects with filler compound. Spot prime defects after repair. Concrete Floors to be Painted: Remove contamination, acid etch. and rinse floors with clear water. Verify required acid-alkali balance is achieved. Allow to dry. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) 3.03 3. 04 3.05 3.06 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 09900-5 Paints and Coatings L. Galvanized Surfaces to be Painted: Ftemove surface contamination and oils and wash with solvent. Apply coat of etching primer. M. Uncoated Steel and Iron Surfaces to be Painted: Remove grease. mill scale. weld splatter. dirt. and rust. Where heavy coatings of scale are evident. remove by hand wire brushing or sandblasting; clean by washing with solvent. Apply a treatment of phosphoric acid solution. ensuring weld joints. bolts, and nuts are similarly cleaned. Prime paint entire surface; spot prime after repairs. N. Shop-Primed Steel Surfaces to be Finish Painted: Sand and scrape to remove loose primer and rust. Feather edges to make touch-up patches inconspicuous. Clean surfaces with solvent. Prime bare steel surfaces. Re-prime entire shop-primed item. P. Metal Doors to be Painted: Prime metal door top and bottom edge surfaces. APPLICATION A. Apply products in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. B. Where adjacent sealant is to be painted. do not apply ?nish coats until sealant is applied. C. Do not apply ?nishes to surfaces that are not dry. Allow applied coats to dry before next coat is applied. D. Apply each coat to uniform appearance. Apply each coat of paint darker than preceding coat unless otherwise approved. E. Sand wood surfaces between coats to achieve required finish. F. Vacuum ciean surfaces of loose particles. Use tack cloth to remove dust and particles just prior to applying next coat. G. Where clear finishes are required, tint fillers to match wood. Work fillers into the grain before set. Wipe excess from surface. FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. See Section 01400 - Quality Requirements. for general requirements for ?eld inapection. CLEANING A. Collect waste material which may constitute a tire hazard. place in closed metal containers. and remove daily from site. SCHEDULE - SURFACES TO BE FINISHED A. Do Not Paint or Finish the Following Items: Items fully factory-finished unless speci?cally noted. Fire rating labels. equipment serial number and capacity labels. Stainless steel items. Architectural cast-in-place concrete. Architectural precast concrete. Paint the surfaces described below Under Schedule Paint Systems. with the exception of surfaces identified in Section 09960 High Performance Coatings. Sectionose'rs Seamless Flooring and Section 09965 Special Coatings". SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SSU) CDC P2009453 I uses 252301} C. 3.0? A. SENSITIVE UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 09900-6 Paints and Coatings Paint both sides and edges of plywood backboards for electrical and telephone equipment before installing equipment. SCHEDULE - PAINT SYSTEMS Interior Concrete Walls: Semi-Gloss Finish 151 Cost: S-W Tile-Clad HS Epoxy 2nd Coat: S-W Tile~Clad HS Epoxy mils wet. 3-4 mils dry per coat) Interior Concrete Ceilings: Match existing ?nish 1st Coat: S-W Tile-Clad HS Epoxy 2nd Coat: S-W Tile-Clad HS Epoxy mils wet. 3-4 mils dry per coat) Interior Concrete Masonry Units (CMU): Latex Semi-Gloss Finish ?lst Coat: S-W Kern Cati-Coat HS Epoxy sealen?filler (60-115 sq. ftfgaI) 2nd Coat: S-W Tile-Clad H8 EpoxyI 3rd Coat: S-W TileClad HS EpOxy mils wet. 3-4 mils dry per coat) Interior Metal. Shop Primed: Latex Semi-Gloss 1st Coat: S-W Kern Cati-Coat HS Epoxyr sealen?filler (14 mils wet, 10 mils dry) 2nd Coat: S-W Tile-Clad HS Epoxyr 3rd Coal: S-W Tile-Clad HS EpcnyI [4 mils wet. 3 mils dry.r per coat} END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI coo P2009453 HVAQMQDIFICATIUNS I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEIUJ Section 10250-1 Metal Wall Guards SECTION 10260 METAL WALL GUARDS PART - GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Anodized aluminum wall guards. B. Related fasteners. 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01300 Submittais Section 01351 a Sustainable Project Requirements 0. Section 04310 Unit Masonry Assemblies D. Section 0?.900? Joint Sealers E. Section 09900 Paints and Coatings 1.03 SUBMITTALS A. Product Data: Include physical characteristics. such as durability. for each impact-resistant wall protection system component indicated. B- Shop Drawings: Show locations. extent. and installation details of each impact-resistant wall protection system component. Show methods of attachment to adjoining construction. Because wall guard speci?ed is custom contoured and fabricated to exact dimensions. shop drawings cannot be made from scale dimensions taken from architectural drawings. C. Samples for Verification: For the following products, showing the full range of color and texture variations expected in each impact-resistant wall protection system component. Prepare samples from the same material to be used for the Work. 1. Wall Guards: 12-inch- long samples of rail and mounting bracket. Include examples of joinery. corners. and field splices. Show and radius. D. List of References: As specified in Quality Assurance Article. E. Material Test Reports: From a quali?ed testing agency indicating compliance of each impact? resistant wall protection system component with requirements indicated. based on tests performed by testing agency within the past five years. 1. Wall Guards: Test data verifying the alloy composition of the rail and brackets. F. Maintenance Data: For each impact?resistant wall protection system component to include in maintenance manuals speci?ed in Division 1.04 QUALITY ASSURANCE SENSJTIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU coc P2009453 I [b}(3}142 U.S.C. 262301} 1.05 1.06 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ Section 102603 Metal Wall Guards A. Installer Quali?cations: A manufacturer-approved experienced installer who has completed installation of impact-resistant wall protection system components similar in material. design. and extent to that indicated for this Project and whose work has resulted in construction with a record of successful in-service performance. 3. Manufacturer Qualifications: A ?rm experienced in manufacturing impact-resistant wall protection system components similar to those required for this Project and with a record of successful iri-service performance. 1. References: Provide references of at least five completed projects utilizing wall bumper rails. of similar scope as this Project. listing: a. Project name. b. Linear feet of rail installed c. Name and telephone number of contact. C. Source Limitations. Obtain each color. grade. ?nish. and type of impact-resistant wall protection system component from a single source with resources to provide components of consistent quality in appearance and physical properties. D. Product Options: information on Drawings and in Speci?cations establishes requirements for systems aesthetic effects and performance characteristics. Aesthetic effects are indicated by dimensions. arrangements. alignment. and profiles of components and assemblies as they relate to sight-tines. to one another. and to adjoining construction. Performance characteristics are indicated by criteria Subject to verification by one or more methods including pre-construction testing. field-testing. or in-service performance. 1. Do not modify intended aesthetic effects. as judged solely by Project Of?cer. except with Project Of?cers approval. If modi?cations are proposed. submit comprehensive explanatory data to Project Officer for review. 2. Do not modify performance characteristics as de?ned by product requirements speci?ed in Part 2, except with Project Officer's approval. If modifications are proposed. submit comprehensive explanatory data to Project Officer for review. E. impact Strength: Provide impact-resistant wail protection system components with a minimum impact resistance of 25.4 ft?lbfr?in of width when tested according to ASTM 256. Test Method A. DELIVERY. STORAGE. AND HANDLING A. Store wall surface protection materials in original undamaged packages and containers inside a well-ventilated area protected from weather. moisture. soiling. extreme temperatures. and humidity. PROJECT CONDITIONS A. Environmental Limitations: Do not install wall surface-protection system components until the space is enclosed and weatherproof and ambient temperature within the building is maintained at not less than 70 deg {21 deg C) for not less than 72 hours before beginning installation. 3. Field Measurements: 1. Prior to taking field dimensions. representative of manufacturer to visit site. evaluate the conditions. and report any conditions that prohibit the initiation of ?eld measurements. 2. Permanent walls and door bucks must be in ptace. All cutouts in wall at level of railing installation, such as electric. plumbing and service panels. air handling vents. and ?re alarm boxes. must be located and indicated on field measurements so as not to be covered by well guard. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEIUI coc P2009453 Section 10250-3 Sahib?? i .Hvec MODIFICATIONS Foe-l Metal war Guards 3. All measurements to be taken on site by authorized representative of manufacturer. 4. Field measurements must be taken to 1f8 inch. and are to be taken level against the wall surface at the elevation at which the wall guard is to be installed. 1.0? MAINTENANCE A. Maintenance instructions: Provide the manufacturer's instructions for maintenance of installed work. Include recommended methods and frequency for maintaining optimum condition under anticipated traf?c and use conditions. include precautions against cleaning materials and methods that may be detrimental to finishes and performance. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 MATERIALS A. Aluminum Extrusions: Provide alloy and temper recommended by the manufacturer for the type of use and finish indicated. but with not less than the strength and durability properties specified in ASTM 221 for 6061-T5511 B. Stainless Steel: AISI Type 304. stainless steel plate. minimum 0.06 inch. No. 4 satin ?nish. C. Fasteners: Provide aluminum. nonmagnetic stainless steel. or other non-corrosive metal screws. bolts. and other fasteners compatible with aluminum components. hardware. anchors. and other items being fastened. D. Provide neoprene spacersfgaskets between any dissimilar metals for a Dialectic Break. 2.02 WALL GUARDS A. Basis of design manufacturer: Aluminum Wall Protection System" as manufactured by Life Science Products. Incorporated. Phone (410)-778-6474. 1. Material: 1/4 inch by 4 inch. 6061-T6511 aluminum alloy. extruded rectangular aluminum . bar with 118 inch radius edge. Federal Speci?cation DOA zoom. No variation in aluminum alloy permitted. 2. Face and edges: 120 grit mechanical finish prior to bending. 3. Finish: Clear sulfuric anodized to military specification A8625 Type II. Perform anodizing after all cutting. drilling. countersinking. and bending. B. Aluminum Bracket: 1. Material: 6051-T6511 alloy extruded aluminUm shape with 0.200-inch radius edge vertical flange. Federal Specification 00A 200? B. No variation in aluminum alloy permitted. 2. Dimensions: 3 inch offset wall to backside of rail; 0.13 inch minimum web thickness; 0.20 inch minimum flange thickness; 2.5 inch by 3.0 inch bracket face at rail: 2.5 inch by 3.0 inch bracket face at wall. 3. Radius Edge: 0.200-inch radius edge on all vertical bracket flanges. 4. Finish: Clear sulfuric anodized to military specification A8625 Type ll. Perform anodizing after all cutting. drilling. and de-burring. 5. Location: a. 3 inch brackets at all locations unless noted otherwise. C. Hardware: 1. Rail to bracket: 1M inch-20 by 3:34 inch stainless steel Phillips flat head. countersunk. machine screw with 1.14 inch-20 stainless steel esna nut [nylon insert). SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (soc P2009453 anc MODIFICATIONS Foal . [bitsizizz usc. 2523i?) 2.03 2.04 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 10260-4 Metal Wall Guards 2. Bracket to concrete block wall: #15 by 14:2 inch long Phillips pan head. type A. stainless steel tapping screw. with a #16 by 1-1i2 inch PVC masonry anchor. Set screw with pneumatic wrench to 30 toot-pounds of torque. 3. Bracket to gypsum wallboard wall: round headed wood screws. 1M inch 2 1l2 inch long Phillips head zinc plated D. Fabrication: 1. Tolerance: 118 inch. 2. Shear and punch metals cleanly and accurately. Remove burrs. 3. Ease eXposed edges to a radius of approximately 1i'32 inch (1 mm). unless otherwise indicated. 4. Terminal ends must be an integral part of the rail. not separate components. 5. Radius terminal ends. 6. Terminal and sections: 3 inch radius bend continuing from plane of rail face towards wall and ending 1l2-inch from wall. a. Radius arc: 54 degrees. b. Final 1.375 inches of terminal end to be straight. c. No variation in configuration permitted. Contours: Custom-contour railing to existing wall configurations. protrusions. abutments. and interruptions. Maintain wall bumper rail's structural integrity and 3 inch clearance from walls. 3. Con?gure entire rail as continuous. Install terminations only at doors. electrical panels. ?re extinguishers and other in-wali mounted apparatus that local codes prohibit from blockage. 9. Fabricate inside and outside corners as an integral part of the rail construction. 10. Space wall brackets no greater than 4 feet apart. Determine exact bracket locations on fabrication drawings. and pro-drill bracket holes in railing. Countersink all mounting holes to match the mounting hardware. 11. Anodize aluminum following complete fabrication. then cover with 4 mil vinyl on all surfaces and wood crate for shipment. FABRICATION A. General: Fabricale wall protection systems to comply with requirements indicated for design. dimensions. details, finish. and member sizes. including wall thickness of components. B. Pre-assemble components in the shop to the greatest extent possible to minimize field assembly. Disassemble only as necessary for shipping and handling. C. Fabricate components with tight seams and joints with exposed edges rolled. Provide surfaces free of evidence of wrinkling. chipping. uneven coloration. dents. and other imperfections. Fabricate members and fittings to produce ?ush. smooth. and rigid hairline joints. D. Brackets. Flanges. Fittings, and Anchors: Provide wall brackets. ?anges. miscellaneous fittings. and anchors for interconnection of members to other construction. E. Provide inserts and other anchorage devices for connecting components to concrete or masonry. Fabricate anchoring devices to be capable of withstanding imposed loads. Coordinate anchoring devices with the supporting structure. FINISHES GENERAL A. Comply with NAAMM's "Metal Finishes Manual for Architectural and Metal Products" for recommendations for applying and designating finishes. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION ., I CDC P2009453 Section 10269-5 53532:: HVAQMDDIEJCAIIONS. I Mela, Wan Guards B. Protect mechanical finishes on exposed surfaces from damage by applying a strippable. 2.05 temporary covering before shipping. Appearance of Finished Work: Variations in appearance of abutting or adjacent pieces are acceptable if they are within one-half of the range of approved samples. Noticeable variations in the same piece are not acceptable. Variations in appearance of other components are acceptable if they are within the range of approved samples and are assembled or installed to minimize contrast. ALUMINUM FINISHES A. Finish designations prefixed by AA compiy with the system established by the Aluminum Association for designating aluminum ?nishes. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 3.02 3.03 EXAMINATION A. B. Examine areas and conditions in which wall surface protection components and wall protection systems will be installed. Complete all finishing operations. including painting. before beginning installation of wall surface protection system materials. Do not proceed with installations until unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected PREPARATION A. General: Priorto installation. clean substrate to remove dust. debris. and loose particles. INSTALLATION A General: Instali wall surface protection units plumb. level. and true to line without distortions. D. Do not use materials with chips. cracks. voids. stains. or other defects that might be visible in the finished work. Install aluminum retainers. mounting brackets. and other accessories in strict accordance with the manufacturer's written instructions. Wall Guards: 1. Stamp each railing piece on back with number to match numbered section on shop drawing. for layout at installation and for future reference. 2. Mount brackets to wall at no greater than 4 foot intervals. 3. Typical installation elevation. finished floor to top edge of rail: 12 inches. elevation to be approved by Contracting Officer if required by ?eld conditions. 4. Countersink all mounting holes to match the mounting hardware. 5. Fasten rail to each bracket with a minimum of two fasteners. 6. Locate all splices centered on support bracket. Fasten each rail segment with two fasteners. Align rail segments to form a smooth and flush installation. without any projections or warpages. 7. Provide continuous bead of silicone at junction of bracket face to special coating on concrete at wall surface. Alternate Electrical Break Dissimiliar Metals SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section $523.35 i "Han MODIFICATIONS -- -- Metal Wall Guards 1. Install neoprene gaskets or spacers set in structural silicon sealantiadhesive at all items being installed having the capability of Galvanic actionl'deterioration with the surface upon which the item is being installed and is touching. 3.04 CLEANING A. General: Immediately upon completion of installation. clean plastic covers and accessories Using a standard ammonia-based household cleaning agent. Clean metal components in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. B. Remove excess adhesive using methods and materials recommended by manufacturer. C. Remove surplus materials. rubbish. and debris resulting from installation upon completion of work and leave areas of installation in neat. clean condition. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU . cocrsurro-INGEI 15050-1 BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS PART 1 - GENERAL APPLICATION OF THIS SECTION A. This Section applies to all other Sections in Division 15, as the work is applicable. 1.01 1.1.03 A. B. C. 1.04 A. B. C. D. E. 1.05 SECTION INCLUDES General requirements for Mechanical work including: 1. Arrangement of work and layout intent. 2. Quality assurance. 3. De?nitions. 4. Regulatory requirements. 5. Access door coordination. Pipe installation procedures. Piping materials are specified under piping systems speci?cations. Valves. Piping Accessories. Pipe sleeves and seals. Electrical equipment and wiring. Accessories materials. Roof penetration counterfiashing. Temporary Ventilation Requirement Construction Purge Requirement REFERENCE SPECIFICATIONS: Unless Speci?ed Otherwise, follow: Coordination of space. spacing of inserts and load limitation procedures of Section 01315. Material and installation procedures of Section 03300 for cast-in-place concrete work. Material and inslailation procedures of Section 0?600 for counter?ashing of mechanical roof penetrations. RELATED SECTIONS Section 02300 Earthwork for underground utilities. Section 07840 Firestopping at fire rated construction. Section 07900 - Joint sealers at non-?re rated construction. Section 09900 Field painting of mechanical work. Section 15810 - Sleeves for duclwork. SUBMITTALS: Follow Section 01310 and 01331. A. Schedules: Access door schedule if required. 1 0f02r'08 RECORD DOCUMENTS 5399073 tuiti? at: US 15050-2 BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS 1.06 A. P. Q. 1.0? ARRANGEMENT OF WORK AND LAYOUT INTENT Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangements. approximate sizes and relative locations of principal elements. Provide offsets as required for coordinated installation. Provide equipment. materials and methods not shown or speci?ed. but required to complete the work. Design intent is to locate all equipment requiring maintenance or inspection in a readily accessible location. such as in service chases or mechanical spaces. Do not locate equipment above hard ceilings. Access panels are not acceptable. In finished spaces. conceal work within walls or chases. At suspended ceilings. conceal work above ceiling unless indicated otherwise. in finished spaces with or without ceilings, coordinate with otherwork. ln ?nished spaces without ceilings. and unless shown otherwise, install work in most direct manner. parallel with building lines. Prepare composite drawings at a scale of 1M inch 1?41? or larger. Show this work in relation to other work. Obtain written approval of proposed changes. Distribute drawings to other parties affected. Subject to approval. provide modifications in layout as required to prevent conflict with other work or for proper execution. Do not install piping. ducts or equipment in elevator machine rooms. Locate fan coil units outside of room. Ducted systems to use side wall registers in the room walls. Do not install piping. ducts or equipment foreign to electrical equipment in electrical equipment rooms or telecommunication closets. Do not install piping over. around. in front of. in back of. or below electrical controls. panels. switches. terminals. boxes or similar electrical equipment. Drip pens are not permitted. Do not install equipment. piping or duotwork over electric panels and switch boards. Follow NEC requirements. Do not allow equipment. piping or ductwork to infringe upon working clearances required by NEC. Position mechanical work for easy unobstructed maintenance access and operation. Coordinate equipment layouts with other work to determine roughing-in requirements. Do not scale drawings for dimension. Neatly arrange work. and in such manner overcome local interference to best advantage of the project. Do not install aluminum or copper products where they will be encased in concrete. Any item containing asbestos is prohibited from use on this project. Manufactured articles. materials 8: equipment shall be of domestic manufactur. i.e. manufactured in the United States of America. QUALITY ASSURANCE: Unless other standards andior more stringent provisions are shown or specified. provide work meeting the following standards. A. Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Institute (ARI). 10i02i06 RECORD DOCUMENTS QSUTB mils-:42 us - 252m, WINDOW .1 ID 1 UIDZIOS . CDGIBUILDINGD Air Diffusion Council American Gas Association Air Movement and Control Association American National Standards Institute (ANSI). American Society of Healing, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). American Society of Sanitary Engineers (ASSE). American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). American Welding Society (AWSJ. American Water Works Association (AWWA). Associated Air Balance Council (AABC). Cast Iron Soil Pipe Institute (CISPIJ. Compressed Gas Association (CGAJ. Cooling Tower Institute (CTI). Copper Development Association Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association (DIPRA). Factory Insurance Association (FIA). Institute of Boiler and Radiation, Hydronics Institute (IBR). Manufacturers Standardization Society of Valve and Fitting Industry National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). National Environmental Balancing Bureau (NEBB). . National Fire Protection Association National Sanitation Foundation Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors National Association (SMACNA). 15050?3 BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL): All material and equipment shall be listed. labeled or certified by Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., where such standards have been established. Equipment and material which are not covered by UL Standards are approved, provided equipment and materials are listed, labeled, certified or otherwise determined to meet safety requirements of a nationally recognized testing laboratory. Equipment of a? class which no nationally recognized testing laboratory accepts, certifies, lists, labels, or determines to be sale, will be considered if inspected or tested in accordance with national industrial standards, such as NEMA, or ANSI. definitive submittals. RECORD DOCUMENTS Evidence of compliance shall include certified test reports and (more use. P99078 15050-4 25230? BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS a. Pressure vessels and safety devices shall be listed and certi?ed in accordance with ASME Test Code. 1.08 DEFINITIONS A. Listed: Equipment is "listed" if of a kind mentioned in a list which; 1. Is published by a nationally recognized laboratory which makes periodic inspection of production of such equipment. 2. States that such equipment meets nationally recognized standards or has been tested and found safe for use in a speci?ed manner. El. Labeled: Equipment is "labeled" if: 1. It embodies a valid label. symbol. or other identifying mark of a nationally recognized testing laboratory such as Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. 2. Production is periodically inspected by a nationally recognized testing laboratory. 3. The labeling indicates compliance with nationally recognized standards or tests to determine safe use in a specified manner. C. Certi?ed: Equipment is ?certified? if: 1. Equipment has been tested and found by a nationally recognized testing laboratory to meet nationally recognized standards or to be safe for use in a specified manner. 2. Production is periodically Inspected by a nationally recognized testing laboratory. 3. It bears a label. tag. or other record of certi?cation. D. Nationally recognized Testing Laboratoqr: A testing laboratory which complies with OSHA regulations. E. High Containment: References to High Containment shall include all equipment. ductworlt. piping. etc. that serve all ESL-4 and ESL-3E spaces and associated support spaces. All of these spaces are located North of Column Line 1.09 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS: Comply with. A. Standard Building Code (SEC) 1994 version with 1996 Georgia Amendments. .53 Standard Mechanical Code 2000. 3800! Standard Plumbing Code 2000. $9001 Standard Fire Prevention Code 1994 version with 1996 Georgia Amendments. 01.0.0 National Board Inspection Code (NBBP). National Electrical Code (NEG), including amendments by local Authority having jurisdiction. 1.10 ACCESS DOOR COORDINATION A. In general. arrange work so access doors are not required. Where mechanical devices requiring access must be concealed in finished construction, coordinate with other trades and submit schedule showing size and location of each door. 9. Where doors are required. follow Section 08310. 10l'02i'06 RECORD DOCUMENTS meadauscs PQQUTB 15050-5 2mm: BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 VALVES A. Manufacturers: Named manufacturers are approved. Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. El. Conditions: When two or more valves of the same type are used in the same service. all valves of this type must be from the same manufacturer. 2. Unless noted otherwise. valves shall open when handwheel or stem is turned in a counter-clockwise rotation and shall close when turned in a clockwise rotation. Valves equipped with gear operators shall function similarly. 0. Gate Valves: Crane. Grinnell. Stockham. Powell. Nlbco. v'ogt. D. Globe Valves: Crane. Grinnell. Stockham. Powell. Nibco. E. Check Valves: Crane. Grinnell. Stockham. Powell, Nibco. F. Spring Loaded Lift Check: Nibco. Grinnell. Powell. Crane. Lunkenheimer. Hammond. G. Iron Body Silent Checks: Nibco. Grinnell. Milwaukee. Muessco. H.- Ball Valves: Nibco. Grinnell. Apollo. Jamesbury. (Contromatics) Watts Regulator Co- I. Butterfly Valves: Keystone. Hills McCanna. Grinnell. Jamesbury. Crane. DeZurik. J. Butterfly Valves (High Performance): DeZurik. Keystone. WKM. Norris. {Contramatics} Watts Regulator Co. 2.02 PIPING ACCESSORIES A. Conditions: Do not use gaskets or packing containing asbestos. 2. Do not use fittings or ?anges manufactured in Asia. B. Gaskets: Manville. Anchor. Flexilallic. DuPont. C. Isolation Flanges and Unions: Electric Pipe Line. Epco Sales. Harco Technologies Corp. El a Industries. Tube Turns Technologies. Inc. D. Joint Sealing Tape: 3M. Crane Packing. Permatex. Dupont. E. Escutcheons: One piece. set screw type. chrome plated steel in ?nished spaces; cast brass in unfinished; none required in concealed areas. 2.03 PIPE SLEEVES AND SEALS A. Pro-fabricated Patented Sleeves: Design Standard Manufacturer: THUNDERLINE. Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. 1. Exterior Walls and Floors (Non Fire Rated): Sleeves 1 Inch through 22 Inches: Thunderline Model W3. Galvanized Steel Sleeve. Sleeve 23 Inches and Larger: Thunderiine Model WS. Galvanized Steel Seals. Seals: Thunderline Model Link-Seal. modular. mechanical type. multiple interlocking rubber. expandable links matched for sleeve assembly. a. For Standard Service Applications (-40 to 250 degrees F): EPDM. b. For High Temperature or Fire SealApplications to 400 degrees F): Silicone. 10i02i06 RECORD DOCUMENTS 15050-6 {blt3}:42 uses PQQOTB - BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS 252301} B. Interior-to-Interior Sleeves (Walls): Fire rated and non-?re rated construction; steel pipe or 18 gauge galvanized steel. C. Floor and Root Sleeves. Steel pipe with welded-on collar to position top of sleeve 2 inches (50 mm) above floor slab, and 8 inches (200 mm} above roof deck. Make bottom of sleeve ?ush with underside of roof or floor deck. D. Size 1i2 inch to 3/4 inch {13 to 20 mm] larger than penetrating element. including pipe insulation. 2.04 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND WIRING A. Motors: Follow Section 15055. B. Motor Starting Equipment: 1. Unless othenivise specified. motor control centers. single and three phase starters and disconnect switches are speci?ed under Division 16. 2. Provide disconnect switches. magnetic motor starters and combination disconnect switches and starters which are an integral part of packaged equipment speci?ed in Division 15. Comply with material requirements of Division 16. C. Wiring and Conduit: Follow Division 16. 1. Unless otherwise specified, power wiring from power source to motor starting equipment including variable frequency drive packages and from that equipment to motors including final connections is specified under Section 16150. 2. Wiring up to 120 volt from control panels to devices is classi?ed as control Wiring, 3. Factory install power wiring from devices, motors and equipment to factory mounted starting equipment speci?ed under Division 15. Wherever possible. factory install control wiring. D. Control Panels: 1. BAS Control Panels: Follow Section 15900. 2. Packaged Equipment Control Panels: Assemble and wire with electrical equipment. interlocks, interconnections and controls. Design panels for only one incoming ?eld feed connection. 3. Other Panels; NEMA 1 general purpose enclosure for interior locations; NEMA 3R weather resistant enclosure for exterior location or when otherwise exposed to moisture. 4. Accessories: a. Internet Circuit Protection: For each motor. control circuit. electric heater and other circuits requiring protection. b. Control Transformers: Where recluired to operate at 120V AC maximum. c. Terminal Strips: Mounted within enclosure arranged for conduit entry. 5. Factory mount and wire devices required for equipment control. 6. Wire control panels so that only one switched ?eld power connection is required. E. Identification: Follow Section 150?5. F. Electrical Characteristics: Verify that electrical characteristics of equipment furnished under this Division are in conformance with electrical services shown or speci?ed. G. Design Modifications: Follow Section 01600 for provisions on substitutions. When proposed products differ from design standard in size. characteristics or capacity. notify all concerned parties in writing of such proposed changes. listing related items of work affected by change. 2.05 ACCESSORY MATERIALS 10i02i'05 RECORD DOCUMENTS Draw. . P919078 15050-7' tails? .. . -- BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS A. Anchorerteeves: Hook type anchor bolts with pipe sleeves of size and length to suit the need. Make sleeves one inch larger than bolt diameter and half imbedded length of bolt. to allow for lateral adjustment. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 3.02 PIPE INSTALLATION PROCEDURES A. 0. Clean piping materials before installation to remove grease, loose dirt. mill scale and other foreign matter. Close open ends of piping and equipment when not actually being worked on, with flange cover. cap or plug to prevent entry of foreign material during construction. Accurater align. support and connect piping without forcing. Make allowance for expansion and contraction in piping systems to avoid strain to joints. hangers or equipment. Group piping whenever practical at common eleVations. Space piping to maintain at least 2 inch (50 mm) clearance from any other object. including movement due to temperature changes. When piping is insulated. maintain 2 inch (50 mm) clearance between insulation and adjacent insulated piping. walls or other objects. Install piping free of traps and with sufficient slope to allow drainage to one or more points. In event that drainage is not possible due to structural obstructions and ?nished ceiling heights. provide additional drain valves as required to allow total drainage. Obtain approval on location of drain valves before installation. Locate piping to maintain access to and clearance around equipment. Locate piping systems to maintain (2.13 m) clear headroom in areas where piping is exposed to view. Do not obstruct coil pulls. filter removals, access doors or work of other Sections. Locate piping valve train connections for maximum serviceabilitv. Arrange equipment piping connections so that maintenance may be performed with minimum impact to connected piping system. Provide accessible flanges and union connections on and return connections of equipment. valves and other items which must be disconnected or removed for maintenance. Where unions are furnished as an integral part of equipment, additional unions are not required. Do not use all-thread (close) nipples. swaged nipples, or bushing reducers. Install piping support system following Section 15060. Hanging from steel roof decks with rigid board insulation is not approved. Provide supplementary support as speci?ed in Section 05500. Hanging from steel roof or floor decks is approved only when there is at least 4 inches (100 mm) of concrete over deck. Where pipe support members are welded to structural building framing exposed to the atmosphere. scrape, brush clean. and apply one coat of zinc rich primer to ?nished welds. THREADED CONNECTIONS 10ro2ros RECORD DOCUMENTS 15050-8 it??i?i BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS A. Ream pipe ends to remove burrs. B. Use only standard taper threads. ANSI 32.1. Make threads full. sharp. clean. and free of ?ns and burrs. C. Use Teflon joint seating tape. Apply to male threads only. Conceal threads on chrome plated pipe. D. Do not use close or short nipples of a size where length of unthreaded pipe is less than width of a pipe wrench. E. Thredolets or similar code approved fittings may be used for branch connections. F. Slip joints are permitted only in sanitary drainage systems on fixture side of traps. G. Factory machine threaded flanges per ANSI 316.5 in pressure rating conforming to piping system. 3.03 WELDED CARBON STEEL CONNECTIONS A. Follow ANSIIASME B311. and where applicable. ANSIIASME 31.9 and ANSIIASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Welding and Brazing Quali?cations: Keep records and certi?cations required by code on ?le and available for inspection. B. When required by code or specification. welders shall be certi?ed in accordance with AWS. following speci?ed reference standards. C. Make welding connections using shielded metal or submerged Electric Arc Welding Method. D. Provide single-vee type butt welds, unless speci?ed otherwise, in accordance with ANSI 816.9 and ANSI 316.25. E. Mitered elbows are not permitted. Use long radius elbows. F. Welded branch connections may be used in place of welding tees. provided ANSI Code for Pressure Piping, 331 is met G. Weldolets. thredolets or similar code approved fittings may be used for branch connections instead of reducing tees where nominal diameter of takeoff is one third smaller than main diameter. H. Do not use laterals and other ioints requiring reinforcement to restore strength of joint to full strength of pipe. I. Whenever welding close to walls. floors or building structure. protect adjacent surfaces with ?re proof cloth. Thorougth clean surfaces of weld splatter. Follow applicable NFPA standards. 3.04 WELDED STAINLESS STEEL CONNECTIONS A. Follow requirements for welded carbon steel connections, except use Tungsten Inert Gas lTlG] Welding Method in accordance with ANSIIASME 331.3. 3.05 FLANGED CONNECTIONS A. Use carbon steel bolts and nuts for cast iron flanges unless otherwise noted. Use alloy steel for steel flanges and High Strength for High Pressure Systems. 10i02106 RECORD DOCUMENTS PQQUTB tutti AEUSCE . .. 3.06 A. B. C. D. 3.07 A. B. 3.08 A. 3.09 A. C. 3.10 A. B. 10i02i'06 15050-9 BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS Except for stainless steel piping. lubricate bolts or studs over entire thread length with graphite and oil mixture. Install piping to equipment without strain. Remove bolts in flanged connections or disconnect piping after installation. to demonstrate bolt hole alignment and fit. if requested. Provide gaskets at flanged connections suitable for design pressure and temperature of fluid contained. Lise ring type for raised face flanges. and full face for flat face flanges. COPPER TUBING CONNECTIONS For solder or braze connections. do not use compression type fittings. Make connections following the Copper Tube Handbook of the Copper Development Association. Make soldered joints with Sb? solder. and brazed joints with silver brazing wire. Refrigerant copper tubing connections shall comply with ANSI 831.5. PLASTIC PIPE CONNECTIONS For PVC piping. do not use adhesives. cements or sealers which have deteriorated or which will not spread smoothly. Join PVC piping by solvent?cementing following ANSUASME 331.3. CONNECTIONS OF DISSIMILAR METALLIC MATERIALS Isolate connections between dissimilar metallic materials where galvanic or electrolytic action may occur. Use dielectric fittings for complete isolation using materials suitable for design pressure. temperature and fluid contained. Isolate non?ferrous piping passing through openings in structural steel with non-conductive material permanently attached to the pipe. PIPE SLEEVES. SEALS AND ESCUTCHEONS Sleeves: Furnish sleeves to other Sections as appropriate for installation. Space sleeves in concrete a minimum of 4 inches (100 mm) apart. Where gypsum board is installed on one side of stud partition only. provide additional sleeve support as required. Seals: At exterior walls and floors. install mechanical seals around pipe, in such manner to ensure watertight installation. Escutcheons: Install plates tight to Wall or ceiling surface. VALVE INSTALLATION PROCEDURES Provide valves at branch connections to mains and at equipment. Use valves of same size as pipe in which they are installed. except for modulating type control valves furnished under Section 15950. Two position tvpe (opentclose) control valves by Section 15950 will be furnished in line size. Install valves with the stem on or above the horizontal. under seat. Install globe valves with pressure RECORD DOCUMENTS M342 P99078 15050-10 25am: BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS D. Pack valves and adjust glands before final approval. E. Install valve extension stems and chain operators on valves 5 Inch and larger where valve stem centerline exceeds 6?6? {1.98 m) above finished floor. Provide chain hooks where required, to prevent fouling of chains on equipment and to clear walk-ways. Terminate chains approximately 3'6" m} above floor F. Install valves so they are accessible for operation. and free from interference when operated. G. Install butterfly valve to flanges with disc in open position. H. Where butterfly valves are used in dead end service for future connections. install a spool piece of the valve flange equal to two pipe diameters. Terminate with a companion flange and blind flange. l. After installation. cut threaded stud on valve bonnets and flanges to expose a minimum of 1- 1:2. but not more than 3 threads beyond nut. 3.11 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND WIRING Follow Division 16. A. Unless othenivise speci?ed. Install wire in conduit B. Install control wiring for products under this Division except as speci?ed in Section 15900. C. Where equipment is furnished without factory mounted control panels or motor starting equipment. install internal control and power wiring to terminal junction or control boxes at one location for connection of field wiring. MISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE WORK Provide concrete thrust blocks and other miscellaneous concrete work required fer mechanical construction. Provide housekeeping pad for all floor mounted equipment unless noted otherwise. Expand pad a minimum of 4? inches beyond the supported equipment outline including skids when appropriate. Chamfer around the top edge of the pad to remove all ninety degree comers. ROOF PENETRATION COUNTERFLASHING When roof mounted work is not furnished With integral counterflashing. provide metal counter?ashing as specified under Section 071500 TEMPORARY VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS A. No air moving system may be operated without all filters in place and no open ends that could 3.12 A. B. 3.13 A. 3.14 3.15 A. B. 10f02l'08 admit dirt and debris Into the air distribution system. CONSTRUCTION PURGE REQUIREMENTS A minimum two-week building tlushout period is required after construction ends and prior to turning the facility over to the Government. All filter systems Will be replaced with new media before turning the facility over to the Government. END OF SECTION RECORD DOCUMENTS U5 I133 202th; 15060-1 PSSOTS HANGERS AND SUPPORTS PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Pipe and equipment support systems with attachments and inserts. 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS A Section 01310 - Structural Submittais.. Section 13930 Anchors. Hangers and Supports for Standpipe and Sprinkler Systems. C. Section 150m - Mechanical Sound. Vibration, and Seismic Control. D. Section 15180 Expansion Compensators with Associated Guides. Section 15810 - Ductwork Supports. 1.03 DEFINITIONS A. Supports: Attachments. hangers. rests. inserts. couplings. anchors. saddles. guides. channels. nuts. bolts. plates. rods. supplemental steel and other miscellaneous components required to sUpport the work. B. Hot Systems Content of pipeline is at or above 120 degrees (48.9 degrees C. Ambient Systems (B): Content of pipeline is not heated or cooled and will remain at 60 to 119 degrees (15.6 to 43.3 degrees D. Cold Systems (0-1): Content of pipeline is at or below 59 degrees (15 degrees E. Plastic Pipei' Thermoset or thermoplastic. rigid or semi-rigid PVC. ABS. DWV. CPVC. FRP. PP and others. 1.04 SUEMITTALS: Follow Section 01300. A. Shop Drawings: Custom fabricated supports only. Show sizes. weights. dimensions. materials and connecting methods used for support system. indicate hanger and support framing and attachment methods. Coordinate design requirements with those required by Section 1507?0. B. informational Submit'tals: lnciude with shop drawings. force diagrams and calculations showing load reaction and movements which determine support sizing. 1.05 QUALITY ASSURANCE: Comply with: A. ANSIIASME BS1 - Pressure Piping Code. 3. M88 SP-58. Manufacturers Standardization Society Standard Practices for Application. Design. Fabrication and Installation of Hangers and Supports. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 PROTECTIVE COATINGS AND FINISHES A. Support and Anchor Material: Compatible with materials being supported. Protect against corrosion. abrasion and electrolytic action in accordance with MSS and SP-BQ. 10(02106 RECORD DOCUMENTS [mew-2 us 252m: P953078 -- 15060-2 HANGERS AND SUPPORTS 2.02 A. 17153.0?? 1 Of?2i06 Use copper plated hangers and supports for bare copper piping. Use plastic covers on supports used for uninsulated stainless steel or plastic pipe. Where design, material. tolerances or post-factory assembly requirements prevent use of metallic factory coatingsl apply multiple field coatings of zinc chromate primer. PIPE HANGERS. SUPPORTS AND ATTACHMENTS Manufacturers: Any manufacturer conforming to specified standards is approved. Grinnell Figure numbers are shown for reference only. Type 1: Adjuatable clevis hanger, carbon steel. Figure 260. Type 6: Adjustable swivel ring, split ring type. Malleable iron or carbon steel. Figure 104. Type 8: Extension pipe or riser clamp, carbon steel. Figure 261. Type 10: Adjustable swivel ring. band type, carbon steel. Figure TD. Type 20: Side beam or channel clamp. Malleable iron jaw with steel bolt and nut; steel hook rod with nut and spring washer. Figure 225. Type'28 and 29: Forged steel beam clamp with nut. Figure 292. Type 31: Light welded carbon steel bracket. Attach pipe with scheduled hanger or support. Figure 194. Type 32: Medium welded carbon steel bracket. Attach pipe with scheduled hanger or support. Figure 195. Type 33: Heavy welded carbon steel bracket. Attach pipe with scheduled hanger or support. Figure 199. Type 35A: Slide assembly for longitudinal movement. Carbon steel tee with stainless steel slide plate; carbon steel base with teflon slide plate. Travel: 10 inch (250 mm) minimum. Figure 25? Type 2. Type 358: Slide assembly for mold-directional movement. Carbon steel tee with stainless slide plate; carbon steel base with teflon slide plate. Travel: 10 inch (250 mm) minimum. Figure 25? Type 7. Type 350: Slide assembly, for multi-directional movement. Carbon steel tee with stainless steel slide plate; carbon steel base with teflon slide plate. Travel: 5 inches (12? mm} minimum. Figure 257 Type 7. Type 35D: Saddle type slide assembly for mulli-directional movement. Carbon steel saddle and shield with PTFE slide plate: carbon steel base with teflon slide plate. Travel: 5 inch (12? mm) minimum. Figure 43?; Type 1 slide base ?gure 438. Type 38: Adjustable pipe saddle support, cast iron. Provide iocknut nipple. floor flange. and concrete pier or steel SUpport. Figure 264. Type 39: Pipe covering protection saddle. Curved carbon steel plate up to 24 inch (310 mm) and alloy steel for larger sizes. Minimum 12 inch {300 mm) in length. Figures 160 through 165. RECORD DOCUMENTS IbliEI :12 US EBEallt P99 OTB - 15060-3 HANGERS AND SUPPORTS (1. Type 40: Insulation protection shield. Carbon steelI galvanized. minimum 12 inch {300 mm) in length. Shields used with rollers shall be increased one nominal gauge thickness. Figure 167. R. Type 41: Single pipe roll. Cast iron roll and sockets. steel roll rod. Figure 3. Type 43: Adjustable roller hanger. Cast iron roll. carbon steel yoke. roll rod and hes nuts. Figure 181. T. Type 44: Pipe roll. complete. Cast iron roll and stand. Figure 271. U. Type 45: Pipe rolland plate. complete. Cast iron roll and plate. Figure 21?3". V. Type 46: Adjustable-pipe roll and base. Cast iron base plate. stand and roll. Provide floor flange and concrete pier or steel support for floor support. Figure 274. W. Rigid Pipe Hangers {Anchors}: In accordance with ASTM FTOB. x. Guides: Carbon steel spider type. Figures 255 and 256- Y. Trapeze Hangers: Steel channels (Unistrut) and scheduled individual hanger. roll or clamp suppod. Z. Uninsulated Tubing SUpport 1Q Inch (13 mm) and Smaller: Tube straps or one hole clamps. 1. Shields for Vertical Copper Pipe Risers: Sheet lead. 2. Hanger Rods: Steel. cadmium plated. threaded both ends. threaded one end. or continuously threaded. 3. Spring Hangers: Follow Section 1507'0. 2.03 INSERTS AND ATTACHMENTS A. Select inserts and attachments to suit loading conditions in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. See Section 01310 for limitations, taking into consideration that more than one trade may be applying loads to the device. Inserts for Placement in Concrete Formwork: Malleable iron. wedge or universal case with nut. galvanized finish. Size inserts to suit threaded hanger rods. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 INSERTS AND ATTACHMENTS A. Furnish inserts for placement in concrete slabs and beam formwork and masonry. Provide template. drawing or other instruction as required for correct location. B. Where concrete slabs form finished ceiling. make inserts flush with underside slab surface- C. Provide lock nuts on threaded hangers. D. Provide high density inserts and shields on insulated pipes. inserts to be 2" longer than shields. 3.02 PIPE HANGERS AND SUPPORTS A. 1 OIO2IOS Incorporate requirements of Section 150m within the support system. RECORD DOCUMENTS P951078 U.S.C. 252301} - --coereu?rtotuc 15060?4 HANGERS AND SUPPORTS Support piping systems in accordance with applicable referenced standards. Space plastic piping in accordance with manufactUrer's recommendations. Independently support concentrated weights such as valves. strainers. heavy ?ttings and where direction changes occur. . Provide pipe system supports immediately adjacent to connected equipment. Do not support system valve trains and pipe risers on pumps. heat exchangers or other similar equipment. Supports required for hydrostatic testing of steam systems shall be permanent. Place a hanger within 12 inches (300 mm) of each horizontal elbow. Use hangers with 1 1I2 inch (38 mm) minimum vertical adjustment. . Support horizontal cast iron pipe within 18 inches of each hub or no-hub clamp. with 5 foot {1.52 m} maximum spacing betwaen hangers. . Where cast iron pipe is suspended in excess of 18 inches (457 mm) by means of nonsrigid A. 10J?02r?06 3.03 PIPE HANGER. SUPPORT AND ATTACHMENT SCHEDULE hangers, brace pipe against horizontal movement. Support vertical piping at every floor Support vertical cast iron pipe within 18 inches of a hub or no-hub clamp. If intermediate support is required. provide support within 18 inches of a hub or nowhub clamp. Where several pipes can be installed in parallel and at same elevation. custom designed trapeze hangers may be used. Incorporate rollers. shields. saddles. lateral support limit devices, and similar apparatus in trapeze hanger design. Support riser piping independently of connected horizontal piping. Do not use sprinkler and standpipe system supports for non-sprinkler and standpipe system components. . Attach supports to building structure or supplemental steel attached to building structure. Do not support piping from other piping. Hot Systems ITEM INSULATED SYSTEMS Type 1 up to 2 Inch Type 41, 43 with saddle for larger Type 44, 48 with saddle Type 31. 32, 33 Type 46 with saddle Type 8 Type 39 Hangers Pipe Roll Supports Wall Supports Floor Supports Vertical Supports Protection Shield or Saddle RECORD DOCUMENTS luxrs: 4: Us I: . 15030-5 spasm; . . HANGERS AND SUPPORTS El. Ambient Systems (B): ITEM INSULATED SYSTEMS UNINSULATED SYSTEMS Hangers Type 10 with shield Type 1, 6. 10 Pipe Roll Supports Type 44, 45. 56 Type 44, 45. 46 with shield - Wall Supports Type 31, 32. 33 Cast Iron Hook-up to 3 inch; Type 32. 33 all sizes Floor Supports Type 38 with shield Type 38 Vertical SUpporls Type 8 Type 3 Protection Type 40 None Shield or Saddle Slide Assembly Type 35A. 353, 356 C. Cold Systems ITEM SYSTEMS Hangers Type 1, 10 with shield Pipe Roll Supports Type 441 45' 46 with shield Wall Supports Type 311 32, 33 Floor Supports Type 38 with shield i Vertical Sopports Type 8 Protection Type 40 Shield or Saddle END OF SECTION 10(024'06 RECORD DOCUMENTS (b?31142 262aih} 15075-1 MECHANICAL IDENTIFICATION P990178 PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Identification of mechanical equipment and piping systems. 1.02 QUALITY Comply with" A. CDC Design and Construction Standards 8? Guidelines - Mechanical 3. A13 1 - Scheme for the Identification of Piping Systems. C. Submittals required in accordance with Section 01300. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 MANUFACTURERS A. Underground Warning Tape: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. 1. Terra Tape. B. Other Identification Materials: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01800. Seton Nameplate Corporatlon Brady Signmark Divisron. Craftmark Identification Systems. DSG Sign and Label. 2.02 MATERIALS A. Color: Shall be as follows; SERVICE STENCIL COLOR SHERWIN-WILLIAMS NAME Domestic Hot Water Supply (DHWS) Orange Marmalade. SW1629 Domestic Hot Water Ret. Peach Peach Mimosa, SW1S1S Hot Water (130? HW) Light Orange Cellini Gold. Domestic City Water (DCWI Blue Oslo Blue. SW1735 Low Press. Steam Light Pink Sweet William. SW1585 Medium Press. Steam (MP5) Pink Fifties Pink. SW1593 High Pressure Steam (HPS) Dark Pink Rasben'y Sorbet. SW1580 Condensate Return Light Gray Stardust. SW1228 Chilled Water Supply Blue Aegean Sky. Chilled Water Return (CHWR) Light Green See SW1743 Reheat Hot Water Sup. Brown Santa Fe Trail. SW1069 Reheat Hot Water Rel. Magic Night. SW1201 Vacuum (VAC) Retro Rose. SW1047 Deionized Water (DI) Green Tree House. SW1726 Fire Protection Lines (FIRE) Red Safety Red Roof Leader (Drain) (RD) Black Black Breathing Air (BA) Dark Brown Wilk Rose. SW2292 Liquid Nirtogen (LN2) B. Plastic Nameplates: Laminated 3-Iayer plastic with engraved black letters on light contrasting background color. 10f021'06 RECORD DOCUMENTS uhztE-42 ZEEathi 150T5-2 MECHANICAL IDENTIFICATION Plastic Tags: Laminated 3-layer plastic with engraved black letters on light contrasting background color. Minimum size; 1 1:2 inch diameter {38 mm). Metal Tags: Brass or aluminum with smooth edges and stamped letters; minimum size; 1 (38 mm) inch diameter. Plastic Pipe Markers: Factory fabricated, flexible, semi-rigid plastic. preformed to ?t around pipe or pipe covering: showing service. flow direction and pressure. Schedule: OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF INSULATION SIZE OF LETTERS LENGTH OF ARROW OR PIPE (INCHES) (INCHES) (INCHES(19 mm) 2112 - 1121432 mm) 12? 8 ~10(200-250 mm) 2 1f2 {64 mm) 24" Over 10 (250 mm) 4 {100 mm) 30" Equipment 2 1i2 (64 mm) NA Underground Warning Tape: Provide orange underground marking tape for buried utilities with scheduled warning message printed in black letters. 1. Marking Tape: 6 layers of (152 mm} copolymer film bonded together without use of adhesives; 6 inches (152 mm) wide; minimum of mils thick; tensile strength 160 pounds (22 kg] per 6 inch (152 mm) wide strip. Elongation shall exceed 800 percent per ASTM BEBE-753. Print installation instructions down the entire length of the tape. 2. Schedule: Utility Warning Message Sanitary Sewer SANITARY SEWER Cold Water POTABLE WAT ER Non-Sanitary Sewer NON-SANITARY SEWER Fire Water FIRE WATER Stencil Paint". Base color shall be Sherwin William Industrial Enamel. 8542. or equivalent. Stencil color shall be as specified elsewhere- Valve Chart and Schedule: Typed schedule giving service, location and number of each valve. Valve numbers shall correspond to those shown on Protect Record Documents. Mount schedules in aluminum frames with clear plastic fronts. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 A. 10(022'06 INSTALLATION Plastic Nameplates: Install with corrosive-resistant mechanical fasteners. Do not use adhesives. Plastic or Metal Tags: Install with corrosive?resistant chain. Plastic Pipe Markers: Install so as to be readable. RECORD DOCUMENTS lull": Hose 5 PQQUTB 15075-3 2523'? MECHANICAL IDENTIFICATION 3.02 IDENTIFICATION A. Equipment: 1. Identify air conditioning units. air handling units. fans, air terminal units, pumps, heat transfer equipment, water heaters, tanks, water treatment devices, and all other equipment with plastic nameplates permanently attached to equipment. 2. Small devices, such as inaline pumps, may be identified with plastic or metal tags. El. Valves: Identify valves in piping systems (except local plumbing fixture shut-off valves) with plastic or metal tags. C. Above Ground Piping: identify piping, covered or uncovered, concealed or exposed, with plastic pipe markers. Tags may be used for diameters less than 3K4 inch (19 mm). 2. Install markers on maximum spacing of 15 feet (4.5 m) on straight runs including risers and drops; adjacent to each valve and at each side of penetration of sancture or enclosure and at each obstruction. 3. install markers sufficiently loose to permit sliding along pipe for painting. D. Underground Piping: Bury tape continuously along entire length of each utility ?ne, at a depth of 18 inches (457 mm) below grade, directly above utility line. E. Controls, Control EnclosuresiF-?anels: 1. Identity each gauge, meter, switch or other device with plastic nameplates. 2. Control enclosuretpanel mounted devices shall indicate function below each device. 3. identify each enclosureipanel additionally as to system service. F. identify motor starting equipment furnished under this Division in accordance with Section 15050. G. Ductwork: Identify accessible hazardous exhaust [high containment) ductwork with stencil paint in most visible location. Identify every 15 feet (4.5 m) on straight runs, at drops and risers, on both sides of penetrations and obstructions. Provide hazard identification labels only for the following systems. 3.03 VALVE CHART AND SCHEDULE A. install chart and schedule in each mechanical equipment room in location directed. END OF SECTION RECORD DOCUMENTS P519078 15030-1 .CDCIBUILDING MECHANICAL INSULATION PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Piping, ductwork. and equipment insulation. with related accessories. 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 15130 Insulated block for Type 1 flow sensors and insulated ball valve handles. 1.03 SUBMITTALS: Follow Section 01300. A. Product Data: Describe each insulation type. B. Schedule: Show each type of insulation, location and thickness. C. Samples: Each type of insulation and jacket on pipe and duct samples. Plastic pipe may be used to illustrate assembly. Include bands. tapes, fasteners, anchors and adhesives as applicable. Fabricate samples in cut-away manner to show all components. 1.04 QUALIFICATIONS A. Applicator: Company specializing in insulation application with at least three years experience. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 DESIGN STANDARD MANUFACTURERS: Manufacturers or model numbers listed are the design standards. Substitutions subject to Section 01600 are: A. Insulation: Schuller (Manuille). 2 3 Owens-Corning. 4 Knauf. 5. CertainTeed. 5. Rubatex. T. Pabco. 8 Promat. 9. Thermal Ceramics. 10. Manson B. Metal Jackets: 1. 0. Ceramic Fiber Blanket Insulation: Premier Refineries and Chemical Co. D. Wire Mesh Jackets: ACS Industries Inc. E. Other substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. 2.02 MATERIALS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. Use materials with maximum rating of 255050 for ?ame spreadlfuel contributedismoke developed in accordance with ASTM E84. RECORD DOCUMENTS [bl-i} :13 LIEC 3533'? GDCEBUILDING MECHANICALINSULATION B. Use insulation rated forternperatures encountered. 2.03 INSULATION A. Type A: Glass fiber; ANSIJASTM 0547; 'It' value 0.24 at 7?5 degrees (24 degrees C). Manville Micro-Lek Plus with vapor barrier. Owens-Corning Type SSL-II with ASJ vapor barrierjacket. E. Type B: Rigid glass fiber board: ANSIIASTM 0612', value 0.22 at ?5 degrees (24 degrees C). with white foil laminate vapor barrier facing. Manville 81? Spin-Glass with AP jacket. Owens-Corning Type 705 with jacket. I C. Type W: Flexible glass fiber wrap; ANSIIASTM non-compressed 'It' value 0.26 at 75 I degrees (24 degrees C), with foil scrim; Kraft vapor barrier facing 0.?5 [12 i density. Owens-Corning T-100. Manville Microlite Type 100 Faced Duct Wrap. D- Fire Barrier Duct Wrap: Insulation shall provide protection to the duct equivalent to a two hour fire resistance rating and shall be acceptable to all applicable building. fire and mechanical codes. 2.04 PIPING ACCESSORIES A. Aluminum Jackets and Elands: ASTM 8209; 0.016 inch (0.4 mm} thick jacket. stucco embossed finish with 3M inch (19 mm) wide bands. B. PVC Jackets: One piece. 20 mil (0.5 mm) thick, pre-molded type, UV protected; Zeston 2000 with Perms-Weld jacket adhesive. C. PVC Valve and Fitting Covers: Zeston. D. Tape: Vapor barrier. pressure sensitive. i E. Adhesive: Vapor barrier, compatible with insulation. F. Glass Cloth: Untreated glass fiber, 8 oztsq. yd. (22 kgme) weight. G. Canvas Cloth: Canvas, 1.65 ozfsq. yd. weight thread count of 20 10. JP. Stevens Style 1658. Use Marathon Industries 130 Sure?Lag Adhesive. H. Knitted Wire Mesh Jackets: Type 304 stainless steel, 0.011 inch diameter wire: flat non? 2.05 A. . 1 0f02f06 corrugated mesh: 8 stitches per inch width; 6 to 8 coUrses per inch length. EQUIPMENT ACCESSORIES Bedding Compounds: Non?shrinking. permanently ?exible. compatible with insulation. Vapor Barrier Cement: Non-flammable, fire resistant, polymeric resin. compatible with Insulation. Canvas Cloth: Canvasl 1.65 ozfsq. yd. weight, thread count of 20 10. JP. Stevens Style 1553. Use Marathon Industries 130 Sure-Lag Adhesive. Equipment Fasteners: Corrosive-resistant metal. Steel: Galvanized sheet, minimum G60 ?nish, ASTM A653IA653M. RECORD DOCUMENTS - P99073 15030-3 set: 3 MECHANICAL INSULATION 2.05 DUCTWORKACCESSORIES A. Adhesive: Waterproof fire-retardant type. B. Glass Fiber Lagging Adhesive: Fire resistive. C. impale Anchors: Galvanized steel, 12 gauge, resistance type weld pins self-adhesive pad with nylon washers or with speed washers. D. Duct Tape: UL rated flame retardant. self-sealing. foil scrim kraft laminate, vapor barrierI 3 inch {7?5 mm) wide. E. lviastic: UL T90, Monolar (Foster) mastic and coating. F. Glass Cloth: Glass fiber cloth. 8 ozlsq. yd. (22 kgi'mz) weight. G. Canvas Cloth: Canvas. 1.65 ozrsq. yd. weight. thread count of 20 ?lo. J.P. Stevens Style 1658. Use Marathon Industries 130 Sure-Lag Adhesive. H. Aluminum Jackets and Bands: ASTM 3209; 0.016 inch [0.4 mm) thick jacket. stucco embossed finish with 3M inch (19 mm] wide bands. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 A. B. C. D. 3.02 A. EN ERAL Install insulation after piping and ductwork has been pressure tested and approved. install insulation after heat tracing has been installed and approved. Install materials on clean. dry surfaces Seal joints, seams and penetrations of insulation to maintain vapor barrier. PIPING INSULATION Do not insulate chrome plated piping. Provide insulation on all exposed hot water and drain lines at handicapped sinks. Continue insulation with vapor barrier through pipe supports. hangers and sleeves. Where piping is exposed to view in finished spaces. position and cover seams in least visible locations. Insulate joints. ?ttings. valves. humidifier separator and trap, ?anges. flexible connections, expansion joints and other devices with insulation of like material and thickness as adjoining pipe. Finish with glass cloth and adhesive. Install insulation on valves, ?anges and expansion joints so that it can be easily removed and replaced without damage. Do not insulate unions. strainers. flexible connectors. traps or check valves on hot systems- Where glass ?ber insulation is applied to piping subject to condensation; seal longitudinal laps of jackets with adhesive, and wrap butt joints with 2 inch (50 mm) wide tape. Do not staple. RECORD DOCUMENTS (MEI-42 U.S.C. 262athi P99078 15030?4 MECHANICAL INSULATION F. 3.03 3.04 A. 10/0306 Where ore-molded PVC fitting covers are used: apply multiple layers of insulation until cover is packed. Hot piping covers may be initially secured with stainless steel serrated tacks. Seal seam edges of cold piping covers with adhesive. Secure hot and cold piping covers by taping ends to adjacent insulatioo. Provide an insert, not less than 12 inches {300 mm) long, of same thickness and contour as adjoining insulation. between support (type 40) shield and piping. but under finish jacket, to prevent insulation from sagging at support points. Follow Section 15060. Use heavy density inSulating material suitable for planned temperature range. Factory fabricated inserts may be used. Neatlyr ?nish insulation at supports. protrusions and interruptions. Jackets. Indoors. Concealed From View: Insulate piping with vapor barrier jackets. factory or ?eld applied. Jackets. Outdoors; insulate piping with vapor barrier jackets, Cover with aluminum jacket with seams located on bottom side of horizontal piping. EQUIPMENT INSULATION Do not insulate factory insulated equrpment. Do not insulate over nameplate or ASME stamps. Bevel and seal insulation around these items. Apply insulation to surface by grooving. scoring and beveling. as required. Secure insulation with studs. pins. clips, adhesive. wires. or bands. Fill joints. cracks. seams. and depressions with bedding compound to form smooth surface. On cold equipment. use vapor barrier cement. When insulated equipment requires periodic opening for maintenance. repair or cleaning. install insulation in such manner that it can be easily removed and replaced without damage. HVAC Base Mounted Pumps; Construct minimum 20 gauge steel box section enclosures for pump. Insulate enclosure with removable l' reusable cover. insulation in scheduled type and thickness specified for fluid served Form enclosure in separate mating sections for split case pumps with mating flange coinciding with pump casing split. DUCTWORK INSULATION Where dampers have elevated regulators and access doors have outer flanges. install insulation between duct and regulator or ?ange. Provide standoff brackets for all dampers on insulated ductwork. Insulation (Type W) Application: 1. Lap insulation 3 minimum of 3 inches (75 mm) 2. Secure insulation to underside of horizontal ductwork and all vertical ductwork with mechanical fasteners 12 inches (300 mm) 00 when duct dimension is 18 inches {450 mm) or larger. Where spacing around ductwork will not permit installation of mechanical fasteners. use 100 percent adhesive coverage. 3. Stop and point insulation around access doors and damper operators to allow operation without disturbing insulation 4. Seal jacket joints. penetrations by mechanical fasteners and other vapor barrier penetrations with tape. RECORD DOCUMENTS UEI: 2623'?: -- INSULATION D. Insulation (Type B) Application: 1. Secure insulation to ductwork with mechanical fasteners 12 inches (300 mm) DC- Install insulation with edges butted. Stop and point insulation around access doors and damper operators to allow operation without disturbing insulation. 2. Where spacing around ductwork will not permit installation of mechanical fasteners. secure insulation with 100 percent coverage adhesive and wire wrap 6 inches (150 mm) 00. Provide metal corner pieces to prevent wire damage to insulation at corners. Use mechanical fasteners on all other adjoining surfaces. 3. Provide minimum 12 inch (13 mm) thick insulation over mechanical joints. reinforcement angles and stiffeners. 4. Seal butted joints, penetrations by mechanical fasteners and other vapor barrier penetrations with tape. 3.05 PIPING INSULATION SCHEDULE Piping System Fluid Insulation Thickness (Inches) for Pipe Sizes Types Temp. Range Type 1 and 1 1M 2112 5 8t 5 8 and Smaller - 2 - 4 larger Heating and Humidification Systems Steam 81 Hot Water; High Pressure! 308-450 A 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 Temperature: 251-305 A 2.0 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.0 Medium Pressure! 201 -250 A 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 Tern peratu re: 120-200 A 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 Low Pressure! Temperature; Low Temperature Any A 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 Steam Condensate Cooling Systems Chilled Water. 40-60 A 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Glycol. Refrigerant Below Brine Plumbing Systems: Domestic Lab. Cold Any A 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Water . Domestic Lab. Hot 130 at below A 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 Water, and 131-160 A 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 Recirculating above 160 A 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 1010300 RECORD DOCUMENTS 05.0. P539078 15080-6 262a{hi MECHANICAL INSULATION Piping System Fluid Insulation Thickness (Inches) for Pipe Sizes Types Temp. Range Type 1 and 1 114 21.12 5 6 8 and Smaller - 2 - 4 larger Horizontal Rain Water Conductors Any A 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Above Grade Horizontal Sanitary Piping from Mech. Equipment Area Floor Any A 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Drains Incoming Water Service Any A 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Animal Feed Water Any A 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Laboratory Cold Water Special Any A 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Laboratory Hot Water Special Any Laboratory Hot Water 130 it below A 1 0 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 Recirculating 131-160 A 1 0 1.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 above 150 A 1 0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 Other Systems: Condensate Receiver Unit Vents Any A 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Steam Vents Any A 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Condensate Drain Any A 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 Condenser Water and Equalizer Any A 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Make Up Cold Water Any A 1.0 1.0 1.0 -- Bypass Feeder Piping An), A 1g 1.0 1_0 -.- Note: Type and thickness shown for indoor and above grade applications, Increase listed thickness by 0.5 inches for piping exposed to outdoor ambient temperature. Data meets minimums established by ASHRAE BOA-1980. 10102106 RECORD DOCUMENTS ?333542 US C: 2?2alh,? 3.06 3.07 10102r'06 Pesors 15080-7 MECHANICAL INSULATION EQUIPMENT INSULATION SCHEDULE EQUIPMENT TYPE THICKNESS (inches) Domestic and Laboraton.? Hot Water A 2 Storage Tanks Domestic and Laboratory A 1 Cold Water Storage Tanks Domestic and Laboratory Cold Water A 1 Pressure Tanks Heat Exchangers A 2 Air Separators 1 Steam Condensate Receivers 2 Flash Tanks and Legs 2 Chilled Water Expansion Tani-cs and Pump El 1 Bodies Hot Water Expansion Tanks and Pump Bodies 1 Notes: General: mAs specified for pipe system per piping insulation schedule. DUCTWORK INSULATION SCHEDULE DUCTWORK TYPE THICKNESS (Inches) Supply air 2 duetwork Return air ductwork 2 (all return ductwork inside Mechanical Penthouse.) Outdoor air ductworit 2-112 Single Wall Outdoor air and exhaust plenumsm BM 2 2-152 Blank-out panels at louvers 2 Notes: General: Use Type for round and flat oval. 1? Use Type from floor to above floor when exposed to View and Type elsewhere. END OF SECTION RECORD DOCUMENTS (more? use. 262a[h} U.S.C. 15120-1 PIPING SPECIALTIES PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES meow:- I .63 yet..? 101021'06 nd Wail hydrants (exterior). Hose stations (interior). Hose bibos (interior). Mixing valves. Water hammer arrestors. Pressure reducing valves (water service. direct acting). Pressure reducing valves (gases). Vacuum relief valves Strainers. Balancing valves. low balancing valves and meters. Backflow preventers (reduced pressure type). Double check valve assembly Trap primers. Fresh air inlets. Fixed air gaps. Automatic air vents. Backwater valves. Washing machine connections. Natural gas pressure regulators. Potable water service filters. Point-of-use water filters. . Flush valves for flushing drains. Relief valves. Detergent cleaning station. RECORD DOCUMENTS [oval-.42 use. .. $543142 US C- 262301} I 15120-2 PIPING SPECIALTIES assure copra UILouve 1.02 SUBMITTALS: Follow Section 01300. A. Product Data: Describe each product specified. 1.03 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS: Follow Section 15100. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 DESIGN STANDARD MANUFACTURER: Manufacturers or model numbers listed are the design standards. Unless specifically stated otherwise. substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. 2.02 WALL HYDRANTS (EXTERIOR) Referto schedule on drawings. A. Manufacturers: 1. Jay R. Smith 2. Zurn. 3. Wade. 4 Woodford. B. Non-freeze type. 3M inch (20 mm) hose connection. universal inlet connection. bronze casing. polished bronze face. Include adjustable wall clamp and integral vacuum breaker. 2.03 HOSE STATIONS (INTERIOR HOT COLD WATER) Refer to schedule on drawings. A. Manufacturers: 1. Strahman Valves. Inc. 2. a 8 Brass Works. Inc. 3. Industries. Inc. B. Wall-mounted recessed hose station with angle-type globe valves. check valves. temperature gauge. stainless steel hose rack. 50 feet (15 m) of red hose Assembly and gun ster spray nozzle with renewable rubber cover. One piece stainless steel cover oversized to cover masonry opening. 2.04 HOSE BIBBS (INTERIOR COLD WATER) Referto schedule on drawings. A. Manufacturers: Nibco Woodforci. Zurn Jay R. Smith Wade B. Brass faucet with vacuum breaker suitable for 125 psi (860 kPa) service with wheel handle and wing elbow for bolting to wall. Finish: Chrome plated in finished areas. rough brass in unfinished areas. - 2.05 WATER HAMMER ARRESTERS A. Manufacturers: 1. Jay R. Smith 2. Josam. 3. Wade. 4 Zurn. 5 Sioux Chief Mfg- Co. 10f02f06 RECORD DOCUMENTS 1512?? CDCIBUILDING PIPING SPECIALTIES B. Conform to ASSE Standard 1010. Size units in accordance with PDI Standard WH201. Units shall control and absorb hydrostatic shock pressure of piping system. Field manufactured water hammer arresters are not approved. 2.06 PRESSURE REDUCING VALVES (WATER SERVICE. DIRECT ACTING) A. Manufacturers: 1. Watts Regulator Company. Series U5 and 223. 2. Cla-Val Company 3. Cash Company. B. Cast bronze body, stainless steel seat. neoprene diaphragm. adjusting screw regulating spring tension to set discharge pressure. 2.0? VACUUM RELIEF VALVES (WATER SERVICE) A. Manufacturers: 1. Watts Regulator Company. Model N36. 2. Conbraco Industries Inc. Series 37-200. 3. AW. Cash Valve 00., Model B. Bronze body. opens on vacuum of not over 2 inch (13 mm) mercury column. Disc guide located out of water, test and rated ANSI 221.22. certi?ed by AGA. 2.08 STRAINERS A. Manufacturers: 1. Spirax Sarco (Models as specified). 2. 3. Mueller. B. Size 2 Inch (50 mm) and Smaller: Bronze body screwed. pattern with 1l32 inch (0.79 mm) stainless steel perlorated screen. 250 psi: (1725 kPa) Model BT. C. Size 2 112 Inch to El Inch (65 mm to 200 mm): Cast iron body. ?anged. pattern with 1132 inch mm) stainless steel perforated screen. 250 psi {1?25 kPa); Model Cl-250 and F- 250. D. Provide blowclown valves as specified with piping material schedule. 2.09 BALANCING VALVES A. Manufacturers: 1. DeZurik. Figure 120 2. Keystone. B. Eccentric plug type. 150 psi.(1035 ltPa} bronze body valve. lever actuated with adjustable memory stop. Buna filled teflon seals. neoprene plug facing and threaded ends. 2.10 FLOW BALANCING VALVES AND METERS A. Manufacturers: 2. Illinois. Series 6000. 3. Series CBV. 10l02l'06 RECORD DOCUMENTS Innis- 42 us I: 262mm B. 2.11 D. 2.12 A. 2.13 A. B. 1 $02106 A. 15120-4 PIPING SPECIALTIES Balance Valve: Calibrated brass or bronze construction with provisions for connecting a portable differential pressure meter. Provide meter connection with built-in check valves. An integral pointer shall register degree of valve opening. Construct valves with internal seals to prevent leakage around rotation element. Calibrated curve and determine flow rate by means of pressure drop and valve setting. Construct valves for 300 psi (2WD kPa) working pressure at 250 degrees (121 degrees C). Provide insulation suitable for use on heating and cooling systems. 919931?? Meter: Bell and Gossett Model portable differential meter. with provisions for hanging and that will indicate readings in feet of water. 1. Accuracy 1.0 percent full scale. 2- Provide necessary shutoff valves and purge valves. 3. Provide hoses (10 feet (3m) long) with leak proof threaded connections. suitable for working pressure for 125 psi (860 kPa) at 250 degrees (121 degrees C). BACKFLOW PREVENTERS (REDUCED PRESSURE Manufacturers: 1. Watts Regulator Company. Series 909. Conbraco Industries. Inc. 3. Hersey Products. Inc. 4. Claa?v'al Co. 3M. Inch to 2 Inches (20 mm to 50mm): Bronze body. tight-seating rubber check valve and relief valve assemblies. bronze body ball valve test cocks and strainer. bronze ball shut-off valves. 3 Inches to 10 Inches (80mm to 250 mm): FDA approved epoxy coated. cast iron check valve bodies with bronze seats. cast iron relief valve with stainless steel trim. bronze bodyI ball valve lest cocks and epoxy coated cast iron strainer. resilient wedge gate valve shut-off valves. Conform to ASSE Standard 1013 for reduced pressure principal backflow preventers. DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY Manufacturers: 1. Watts Regulator Company. Model 7UQOSYRW. 2- Ola-Val Company. 3. Hersey Products. Inc. 4. Conbraco Industries. Inc. UL listed. FDA approved epoxy coated cast iron check valve bodies with bronze seats. stainless steel trim. rubber discs. bronze ball valve test cocks and FDA approved epoxy coated strainer. TRAP PRIMERS Manufacturers: 1. Multiple Trap Primers - With distribution units. Model P-l or P-2. Precision Plumbing Product Company Standards: ASSE Standard 1018. RECORD DOCUMENTS miners-2 IJE (I: 15120-5 PIPING SPECIALTIES 2.14 AUTOMATIC AIR VENTS A. Manufacturers: 1. Spirax Sarco. Model 13WS. 2. 3. Crane. 4. Bell 3: Gossett. El. Float operated (normally open) suitable for 150 psi (1035 kF?a) maximum water pressure service. 2.15 WASHING MACHINE CONNECTIONS A. Manufacturers: 1. Acron, Model 8180 2. Guyr Gray, Model T-EUU. 3. Symmons Industries. El. Wall box assemva containing water supply and drain connections and single control valve with lever handle. 2.16 FLUSH VALVES A. Manufacturers: 1. Sloan Valve Company 2. Delany Company 3. Toto 2.1? CARBON DIOXIDE OUTLETS AND REGUALTORS FOR AND HIGH CONTAINMENT ONLY A. Refer to specification 12350 Laboratory Casework for descriptions of carbon dioxide outlets and regulators 002-2, 002-3 and 002?4. Mechanical contractor to provide and install these outlets and regulators in Q-tever and High Containment 2.1 3 Plumbing Vent HEPA Filters. A. Acceptable Manufacturers, Sartorius, Pall Er. Filter cartridge shall be constructed of a PTFE membrane with 0.2um efficiency. Filter housing shall be constructed of 315L stainless steel and shall include: 1. A 4" inlet sanitary ferrule 2. A 4" outlet sanitary ferrule 3. 1" tapping on inlet side of ?lter for injection of test aerosol 4. 1" tapping on outlet side of filter for'insertion of pitot test tube. 5. 1? valved connection on inlet side for steam or liquid decontamination 6. 1" valved connection on outlet side for steam or liquid decontamination C. Installation: Filter housing shall be installed in plumbing vent line with isolation bail valves on inlet and outlet side of filter housing. Provide flanged connections airtight seal capable of withstanding 45psi steam temperatures and pressures. 2.19 Gas Penetration HEPA Filters. A. Acceptable Products: Concoa B. Filter medium shall be microporous ?berglass with 0.2pm efficiency. Filter cartridge shall be 316LL stainless steel with 1" inlet and outlet connection. Inlet and outlet shall include a 1" valved connection for steam or liquid decontamination. C. Installation: Install filter housing in gas piping before penetration of HEPA floor as shown on detail sheet P802. Provide ?anged or otherwise serviceable unions with airtight seal capable of withstanding 45psi steam temperatures and pressures. 10(022'05 RECORD DOCUMENTS manual: .5 P519073 15120-6 assalh .. CDCBUIEDWG PIPING SPECIALTIES 2.20 Breathing Air HEPA Filters. A. Acceptable Manufacturers, Pall model B. Filter cartridge shall be constructed of a-polvpropylene membrane with efficiency rating at 99.99% for 0.3 microns. Filter shall withstand an air flow rate of 2008CFM at BUPSI. Filter housing shall be constructed of 315L stainless steel with a minimum of 1? NPT inlet and outlet connections. 0. Installation: Filter housing shall be installed in breathing air pipe with the following components: Provide flanged connections airtight seal capable of withstanding 45psi steam temperaIUres and pressures. Provide the following: [solation ball valves on inlet and outlet 1" tapping on inlet side of filter for injection of test aerosol 1" tapping on outlet side of filter for insertion of pitot test tube. 1" valved connection on inlet side for steam or liquid decontamination 1? valved connection on outlet side for steam or liquid decontamination All components shall be copper or brass. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.01 INSTALLATION A. Follow Section 01450 for Quality Control of installation. 3.02 HYDRANTS AND HOSE BIEBS A. Locations shown are approximate. Exact mounting heights and locations will be as directed. B. Install wall hydrants flush with wall. C. Install ground hydrants flush with ?nished grade. D. Bolt hose bibbs to wall. 3.03 BALANCING VALVES A. install balancing valves in circulating systems where required to proportionate the flow. 3.04 BACKFLOW PREVENTERS A- Install DVW copper drain line. full size, from preventer relief to nearest drain. B. Install atmospheric type back?ow preventer at hose and and nozzle outlets. 3.05 AUTOMATIC A. Provide isolation valve at inlet to vent for servicing. I3. Provide discharge piping from vent to nearest floor drain or mop receptor. END OF SECTION 10l02l06 RECORD DOCUMENTS P99078 uses 262a[h} 15130-1 HEATING AND COOLING PIPING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 A. 1.02 A. B. C. 1.03 A. B. C. 1.04 A. 1.05 A. B. C. D. 1 010306 SECTION INCLUDES Piping, valves. specialties and accessories. PRODUCTS INSTALLED BUT NOT FURNISHED UNDER THIS SECTION Install thermometers. gauges. indicators and test plugs furnished under Section 15121. Install water coupon rack and bypass (pot) feeder furnished under Section 15183. lnstail control valves. flow switches. temperature sensor wells. flow indicators. meters and gauge taps furnished under SectiOn 15900 RELATED SECTIONS Section 01310 - Structural Submittal Section 15050 - Pipe and Valve Manufacturers, installation Requirements. Section 15060 - Supports, Anchors and Guides SUBMITTALS: Follow Section 01300. Shop Drawings: 1. Augment ductworlt shop drawings with piping systems in mechanical equipment areas and where steam and condensate piping is routed. 2. Piping Exterior to Building: Show plans and sections of aboveground piping systems. Detail structural support system. Include sizes. weights. dimensions. materials. connection methods. and pertinent information required for review. Product Data: For values. specialties and expansion joints. identify each product; size. material. capacity and location of use. lnformationai Submittals: 1. Certifications: a. Certify that field tests have been performed and that work meets or exceeds speci?ed requirements. b. Welders certification c. inspection certificates for pressure vessels from Authority having jurisdiction. 2. Demonstration and Instruction Statement from Government. 3. Operation and Maintenance Data: include assembly views. lubrication instructions and replacement parts list. 4. Special Warranty: Warrant steam system expansion joints for 2 years from date of Substantial Completion. QUALITY ASSURANCE: Comply with; ANSIIASME 831.1 and 331.9. ANSIIASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code ANSIIASME Section 9. Welding Materials and Procedures. Welders: Certified in accordance with Section IX and ANSIIAWS 01 .1. RECORD DOCUMENTS mammal: P990713 15160-2 Mal" HEATING AND COOLING PIPING 1.06 DELIVERY. STORAGE AND HANDLING: Follow Section 01600. A. Store valves in shipping containers with labeling in place. B. Protect flange faces from damage with wood. plastic or soft metal. C. Protect pipe threads from damage with plastic caps. 1.07 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS: Follow Section O1TOU. A. Two service kits for each size and type of steam trap. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 PIPES. VALVES AND FITTINGS FOR INDOOR AND OUTDOOR ABOVE GROUND SYSTEMS A. Manufacturers: See Pipe. Valves and ACCESSDFIES in Section 15050. B. Chilled Water. Make-Up Water. Hot Water: 1. Pipe: 3. 2 Inch and Smaller: Type hard drawn. seamless copper; ASTM 886. b. 2 112 to 10 Inch: Schedule 40. welded or seamless steel. black; ASTM A53 or A106. Grade B. c. 12 Inch Standard weight (0.3?5 inch thick wall). welded or seamless steel. black; ASTM A53 or A106. Grade B. 2. Joints: a. 2 Inch and Smaller: Soldered. b. 2 12 Inch and Larger: Butt-welded. 3. Joint Material: a. 2 Inch and Smaller: Grade Sb5 solder; ASTM B32. b. 2 1f2 Inch and Larger: Welded; ANSIIAWS 131.1. 4. Fittings: a. 2 Inch and Smaller: Wrought copper, soldered; ANSI B1622. b. 2 1:2 Inch and Larger: Steel. in wall thickness specified for pipe. butt-welded. flanged at valve and equipment connections. tong radius elbows; ASTM A234. ANSI 816.9. 5. Unions: a. 2 Inch and Smaller: Bronze. soldered joint. 6. 2 1;?2 and 3 Inch: MalleabIe?Iron. ground joint. threaded. 6. Flanges: a. 2 Inch and Smaller: Cast bronze. companion type. 150 psi; ANSI 616.24. b. 21f2 Inch and Larger: Raised-face. welding neck. forged steel. 150 psi (flat faced when matched to 125 psi ?anges); ASTM A161. ANSI 316.5 7. Bolts and Nuts: Carbon steel hexhead studs with heavy hex nuts; ASTM Grade B.ASTM A1 94 Grade 2H. . 6. Gaskets: Nonuasbestos material. thickness. pressure and temperature to suit system (ring type for raised face; full face for flat faced). Flexitallic. 9. Dielectric Fittings: Isolation flanges. unions and couplings. Epco Sales. Inc. 10. Shut-Off Valves: a. 2 Inch and Smaller: 400 psi two-piece. bronze body ball valve. soldered joint. Grinnell Figure 35008.1. Provide valve stem extensions for valves in insulated systems. b. 2112 Inch: 150200 psi ductile iron. lug type. quarter turn butterfly valve. bronze aluminum disc. seat. multi?position locking handle. gear operated above 4inch size. gear operated with chain-wheel where specified. Grinnell 11. Globe Valves: a. 2 Inch and Smaller: 200 psi bronze. renewable disc. rising stern. union bonnet. soldered joint. Grinnell Figure 32408.]. 10l02f06 RECORD DOCUMENTS USE P953078 15180-3 2622501) HEATING AND COOLING PIPING b. 2 1:2 to 10 Inch. 200 psi flanged iron body. bronze disc. bronze mounted. yoke top. bolted bonnet. Nibco Figure F7188. 12. Check Valves: a. 2 Inch and Smaller: 300 psi bronze. renewable disc. threaded bonnet. soldered joints, swing type, Grinnell Figure 33003.]. b. 2 02 Inch: 150 psi flanged iron body. bronze renewable seat and disc. globe style silent check. Grinnell Figures 502 me to 530. C. Pumped Condensate. 1. Pipe: Schedule 30. welded or seamless steel. black: ASTM A53 or A106. Grade B. 2. Joints: 8. 1 1l2 Inch and Smaller Threaded b. 2 Inch and Larger. Butt?welded. 3. Fittings: a. 1 1.2 Inch and Smaller: Malleable iron. threaded. 150 psi. b. 2 Inch and Larger: Extra strong steel. butt-welded, flanged at valve and equipment connections. long radius elbows; ASTM A234. 4. Unions (1 1.2 Inch and Smaller): Forged steel. bronze to iron ground joint. threaded. 3000 psi: ASTM A105. 5. Flanges: Forged steel. threaded or weldneck. raised face 150 psi (?at faced when matched to 125 psi flanges): ASTM A181 or A105. Grade 1. ANSI 616.5. 6. Bolts and Nuts: Carbon steel hex-head studs with heavy hex nuts; ASTM A307 Grade B. ASTM A194 Grade 2H. 7. Gaskets: Nonwasbestos material. thickness. pressure and temperature to suit system (ring type for raised face: full face for flat faced). Flexitallic. El. Shut-Off Valves: 3. 1 1!2 Inch and Smaller: 150 psi bronze gate. threaded. solid wedge. rising stern. union bonnet. Nibco Figure T134 with TFE Packing. b, 2 to 24 Inch: 125 flanged Iron body gate. solid wedge. bronze mounted. bolted bonnet. Nibco Figure F6170. 9. Globe Valves: 3 1 112 Inch and Smaller 150 psi bronze. renewable disc. rising stern. union bonnet. threaded ends. Nibco Figure T-235. b. 2 to 10 Inch: 125 psi flanged iron body. bronze mounted yoke top. bolted bonnet. rising stem. Nibco Figure F7168. 10. Check Valves: a. 1 1l2 Inch and Smaller: 125 psi bronze body. renewable seat and disc. threaded ends. spring loaded lift type, Nibco Figure T480. b. 2 to 12 inch: 125 psi flanged iron body. bronze mounted. renewable seat and disc. spring loaded. globe style silent type. Nibco Figure F910. D. Condensate Drain; 1. Pipe: Hard drawn seamless copper tubing. Type ASTM 888. 2. Joints: Soldered. Solder Grade Sb5. ASTM BS2. 3. Fittings: Wrought copper. soldered ends: ANSI 816.29. E. Steam and Associated Condensate System. 1 Ul? 021'06 1. Pipe: 3. 1 12 Inch and Smaller: Schedule 80. welded or seamless steel. black; ASTM A53 or A106. Grade B. b. 2 to 10 Inch: Schedule 40 for steam, and schedule 80 for condensate. welded or seamless steel. black: ASTM A53 or A106. Grade B. c. 12 to 24 Inch: Standard weight {0 375 inch thick wall) for steam and KS for condensate. welded or seamless steel. black: ASTM A53 or A106. Grade B. d. At pressure reducing stations. substitute extra strong (XS) weight class piping. 2. Joints: a. 1 1l2 Inch and Smaller: Threaded b. 2 Inch and Larger: Welded. RECORD DOCUMENTS - - - mitt?12' 2:32am; 10110206 cocreur-LDIN-e El 15180?4 HEATING AND COOLING PIPING 3. Fittings: a. 112 inch and Smaller: Forged steel. threaded. 3000 psi; ASTM A105. ANSI 316.11. b. 2 Inch and Larger: Steel. in wall thickness specified for pipe. butt-welded. flanged at valve and equipment connections. long radius elbows: ASTM A234. ANSI 316.9. 4. Unions (1 112 Inch and Smaller): Forged steel. bronze to iron ground joint. threaded, 3000 PSI: ASTM A105. 5. Flanges: Forged steel. threaded or weldneck. raised face. 150 psi (flat faced when matched to 125 psi flanges); ASTM A131 or A1 05. Grade 1. ANSI 316.5. 6. Bolts and Nuts: Carbon steel hexhead studs with heavy hex nuts; ASTM Grade B. ASTM A194 Grade 2H. Gaskets: Non-asbestos material. thickness. pressure and temperature to suit system (ring type for raised face; full face for flat faced]. Flexitallic. 3. Shut-Off Valves: a. 1 1:2 Inch and Smaller: 150 psi bronze gate. threaded ends. solid wedge. rising stem. union bonnet. Nibco Figure T134 with TFE Packing. b. 2 to 6 Inch: 125 psi flanged iron body gate. solid wedge. bronze mounted. OSSY. bolted bonnet. Nibco Figure F6170. c. 8 and 10 Inch; Option: As specified for 2 to 3 inch or 12 Inch and larger. d. 12 Inch and Larger: 150 psi flange Iugged butterfly. carbon steel body. 316 stainless steel stelliled disc. RTFE seat. Keystone K-Lok. Q. Globe Valves: a. 1 1r2 Inch and Smaller: 150 psi bronze. renewable disc. bronze mounted yoke top. union bonnet. rising stem. Grinnell Figure 3240. b. 2 to 10 Inch: 125 psi flanged iron body. bronze mounted disc. bronze mounted yoke top. bolted bonnet. rising stem. Nibco Figure 37133. 10. Check Valves: a. 1 1.2 Inch and Smaller: 125 psi bronze. renewable disc. threaded bonnet. threaded ends. swing type. Grinnelt Figure 3300. b. 2 to 12 Inch: 125 psi flanged iron body. bronze mounted. renewable seat and disc. bolted bonnet. swing type. Nibco Figure F013B. High Pressure (125 psi and above) Steam and Associated Condensate: 1. Pipe: a. 1 1f2 Inch and Smaller: Schedule 80. seamless steel. black; ASTM A53 or A106. Grade B. b. 2 to 10 Inch: Schedule 40 for steam. and Schedule 30 for condensate. welded or seamless steel. black; ASTM A53 or A105. Grade B. c. 12 to 24 Inch: Standard weight {0.35 inch thick wall). welded or seamless steel. black; ASTM A53 orA103. Grade B. d. At pressure reducing stations. substitute extra strong weight class piping. 2. Joints: a. 1 1I2 Inch and Smaller: Welded or threaded with seam weld. b. 2 Inch and Larger: Welded with bookings. Robvon. 3. Fittings: a. 1 11?2 Inch and Smaller: Forged steel. threaded. 3000 psi; ASTM A105. ANSI 316-11 or standard weight steel. welded. long radius elbow; ASTM A234. ANSI 316.9. b. 2 inch and Larger: Steel. in wall thickness as specified for pipe. butt-welded. beveled end. long radius elbow; ASTM A234. ANSI 316.9. 4. Unions (1 12 Inch and Smaller]: Forged steel. socket weld. steel to steel seat. ground joint. 3000 psi; ASTM A105. ANSI 316.11. 5. Flanges: Forged steel. weldneck bore to match pipe. 300 psi; ASTM A131 or A105. Grade 1. ANSI 316.5. 3. Bolts and Nuts: Alloy steel bolt studs threaded full length. ANSI Class 2A threads with heavy he): nuts; ASTM A193 Grade ASTM A104 Class 2H ANSI 3132.2. Gaskets: Non-asbestos material. thickness. pressure and temperature to suit system. Flexitallic. B. Shut-Off Valves: 3. 1 112 Inch and Smaller: 300 psi bronze gate. threaded ends. rising stem. OSSY union bonnet. Figure 1155; ASTM BS1. RECORD DOCUMENTS (straw uses P99073 1 5180-5 2523f?? HEATING AND COOLING PIPING b. 2 to 10 Inch: 250 psi flanged iron body gate. solid wedge, bronze trim. bossed for bypass. Powell Figure 179?; ASTM A126. 12 Inch and Larger: 300 psI flange logged butterfly. carbon steel body. 316 stainless steel stellited disc. metal seat. gear operated with chain wheel where speci?ed. bubble tight, Vanessa Series 30.000. 9. Globe Valves: 3. 1 1.2 Inch and Smaller: 300 psi bronze. renewable disc. threaded and. union bonnet. rising stem. Powell Figure 2612: ASTM BS1. b. 2 Inch and Larger: 250 psi flanged iron body. renewable seat and disc. rising stern, Powell Figure 256: ASTM A126. 10. Check Valves. 3. 1 1/2 and Smaller: 300 psi bronze. renewable disc and side ptug. screwed ends. horizontal swing type. pattern. Powell Figure 5631?. b. 2 Inch and Larger: 250 psi ?anged iron body. bronze renewable seat, plug and disc. swing type. Powell Figure 5?6. G. Steam Vents: As specified for steam piping. 202 WATER SYSTEM VALVES AND SPECIALTIES A. Diaphragm Type Expansion Tanks: 1. Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subtect to Section 01800. a. Amtrol. b. Taco. c. BelldiGossett. 2. Construction: Welded steel. tested and stamped in accordance with Section 80 of ANSIJASME Code: rated for 125 psi maximum working pressure and 240 degrees F. with flexible diaphragm sealed into tank. and steel legs or saddles. 3. Accessories: Pressure gauge and air-charging ?tting. tank drain. inaline air purger. automatic fill valve 4. The tank shall be shipped with a factory pre-charge of twelve (12) PSIG and shall be ?eld precharged to a pressure equal to the hydrostatic pressure of the system at the point where the tank is installed. The precharging of the tank shall be done prior to the introduction of system water into the tank. B. Pressure Reducing Valves 1. Manufacturers Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. a. Bell 8. Gossett. b. McDonnelIt?lMiller. c. Watts. 2. Diaphragm: Non-corrosive material. Operated with integral anti-syphon check valve and inlet strainer Removable valve seat. strainer and stem. Strainer shall be removable without system shutdown. C. Air Vents and Drain Valves: 1. Vents: 3. Manufacturers. Automatic Types: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. 1. 2. Amtrol. 3. Taco. b. Type 1 (Manual): Short vertical section of 1 inch pipe to form an air chamber at accessibte piping system high points with 1i2 inch ball valve at the top of the chamber c. Type 2 (Manual): Short vertical section of pipe to form an air chamber at accessible system high points with ball valve at top of chamber. Size valve for largest pipe within the vented pipe system section as follows; RECORD DOCUMENTS P991078 thirEhJE USE :?Eaih - 2. 15130-6 HEATING AND COOLING PIPING PIPE SIZE VALVE SIZE 6 inch and Smaller 31% inch Ste 16 inch 1 1:2 inch 18 inch and Larger 2 112 inch d. Type 3 (Automatic): Float type cast iron. brass or semi-steel body. copper float. stainless steel valve and valve seat; suitable for system operating temperature and pressure: installed with an isolating valve at air separators. tanks and other equipment; El 8: Model or 10?. Drains: a. Type 1: SM Inch ball valve with hose connection for use at piping system low points. b. Type 2: Valve as scheduled for shut-off service. with hose connection for 34 inch size and fire hose connections for 2 12'2 inch and 4 inch sizes. located at pipe system low points. Size valve for largest pipe within the drained pipe system section as follows: PIPE SIZE VALVE SIZE 6 inch and Smaller 3M Inch 8 to 20 inch 2 1f2 inch Above 20 inch 4 inch c. Type 3: 1?2 inch ball valve with hose connection for use at coils. radiation and con ve ctors . D. Air Separators: 1. 3. Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. a. BeII&Gossett. b. Amtrol. (2. Taco. Tangential Air Separators (With Strainer]: Cast iron or steel. tested and stamped In accordance with Section SD of ANSIIASME Code. for 125 psi maximum operating pressure. blowdown nozzle. tangential inlet and outlet connections. and internal stainless steel air collector tube; El Model Rolairtrol. Provide line size air separator inlet and outlet connections. E. Strainers and Type): 1. Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01000. a. Spirafoarco. b. c. Mueller. ct. Hayward. Size 2 inch and Smaller: Bronze body. threaded and soldered joints. pattern with 1I32 inch stainless steel perforated screen. 250 psi at 405 degrees SpiraJdSarco Model BT and TBT. Size 2 13'2 Inch to 8 inch: Cast iron body. flanged. pattern 125 psi at 450 degrees F: Spirafoarco Model (31-125 . Perforated stainless steel screening; 11'32 inch for sizes 2 112 and 3 inch. 1116 inch for other sizes. Size 10 Inch and Larger: Tee-type carbon steel or cast iron body, class.150 flanged or butt weld connections. hinged access cover. us inch perforated steel basket. tapped for 3M inch blowdown; Hayward Model 91. Strainers (Basket Type): 1. 2. 10.313306 Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. a. Tate Andale. 13. Hayward. Simplex Tate Andaie Model 105: a. Body: 125 to 150 psi cast iron or steel with side flanged inlet and outlet connections with hinged yoke type access cover on top and threaded drain connection with plug at bottom. RECORD DOCUMENTS use. 15130-7 26230? HEATING AND COOLING PIPING b. Removable Strainer Basket: Type 316 stainless steel with 1l8 inch diameter perforated openings with cast iron or steel support. 3. Duplex Tate Andale Model 105: a. Body: 125 to 150 psi cast iron or cast steel; side flanged inlet and outlet connections with hinged yoke or swing bolted access cover; threaded drain connections with plugs at bottom. Machine for two globe valves with tapered metal seats for disc acception. b. Valve discs. seats and spindles shall be bronze, Rising valve stems shall have chain and sprocket drive interlock mechanism. c. Removable Strainer Baskets: Type 316 stainless steel with us inch diameter perforated openings with cast iron or steel support. G. Optional inlet Suction Fittings for End Suction Pumps: 1. Pump suction fittings may be used instead of strainer and pump manufacturer recommended inlet diameters as detaited. 2. Manufacturers: Shall be same manufacturer as for pump. 3. Fitting: Angle pattern. cast iron body. flanged for 2 1:2 inch and larger. rated for 175 psi working pressure. with inlet vanes. cylinder strainer with 3i'16 inch diameter openings. disposable ?ne mesh strainer to fit over cylinder strainer. and permanent magnet located in flow stream and removable for cleaning. 4. Accessories: Adjustable foot support. blow down and gauge tappings. H. Optional Combination Pump Discharge Valves: 1. Combination pump discharge valves may be used instead of separate check valve. shutoff valve and balancing valve as detailed. 2. Manufacturers Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. a. Bell 8. Gossett. b. Taco. 3. Valves: Straight or angle pattern. flanged cast?iron valve body with bolt?on bonnet for 1?5 psi operating pressure. non-slam check valve with spring loaded bronze disc and seat. stainless steel stem. and calibrated adjustment permitting flow regulation. l. Relief Valves: 1. Manufacturers Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. a. Bell Gossett. b. Watts. c. Kunkle. d. Teledyne Farris. 2. Bronze body, viton seat seal. stainless steei stern and springs. automatic. direct pressure actuated. capacities ASME certified and labeled J. Flow Sensors - Type 1 {2 Inch and Smaller). 1. Manufacturers. Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01500. a. Illinois Series 6000. b. Pump. c. Tour 8. Anderson. 2. Calibrated brass or bronze balance valve with provisions for connecting a portable differential pressure meter. 3. Meter connections shall have built-in check valves. An integral pointer shalt register degree of valve opening Construct valves with internal seals to prevent leakage around rotation element. Furnish a calibrated curve to determine flow rate by means of pressure drop and vaive setting. 6. Construct valves for 300 psi working pressure at 250 degrees F: solder ends where available. insulation: Pro-formed block. K. Flow Sensors - Type 2 (2 1f2 Inch to 8 Inch): 1. Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. a. Bell Gossett Circuit Sensor Flow Meter Type A 101'0211?05 RECORD DOCUMENTS P990T8 tutti-'13 US I: 252301. 10i?02f06 CDCIBUI LDIW I 15180-8 HEATING AND COOLING PIPING b. Illinois. c. Cast iron wafer-type with readout valves to facilitate connecting a differential pressure meter to flow meter. Fit each readout valve with an integral check valve designed to minimize system ?uid loss during monitoring process. Provide a calibrated nameplate detailing flow through a range of differential head pressures. Flow Sensors - Type 3 (10 inch and Larger}: 2. Design Standard Manufacturer: Barco (Aeroquip). Substitutions subject to Section 01600 are: a. HIP. b. Foxboro. c. d. Other Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. Venturi type with flanged steel body. Flow Sensors - Type 4 i2 1f2 Inch and Larger}: 1. 2. 749??" Design Standard Manufacturer: Annubar Flo-Tap Model DMT by Dieterich Standard Corporation. Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. Annular pitot averaging type incorporating diamond shape probe with internally separated pressure tubes. Furnish each tube with flow ports in a number and position to suit pipe size, allowing for bi-directionai measurement. Performance: Accuracy of plus or minus 1 percent, of plus or minus 0.1 percent, actual values. include teflon packing gland. 150 psi rated, 316 stainless steel construction. Provide isolation valve and wet insertion mounting hardware in material compatible with pipe. FIOW SEHSDF Meter for Type 1 and Type 2 Flow Sensors: Portable differential meter with provisions for hanging. indicate readings in feet of water at maximum 40 foot range and accuracy of plus or minus 1.0 percent full scale. Include necessary shutoff valves and purge valves. include 10 foot long hoses with threaded connections. suitable for working pressure of 125 psiat 250 degrees F. Meter for Type 3 Flow Sensor: Permanent type meter with provisions for permanent mounting. Indicate readings in gallons per minute with accuracy of plus or minus 0.5 percent full scale. Include blow-down and isolation valves. Meter for Type 4 Flow Sensor: Permanent type meter with provisions for permanent mounting. indicate readings in gallons per minute with accuracy of plus or minus 1 1h? percent of full scale. include carrying case, pipe size conversion chart, 10 foot long hoses and external equalizer control. Include blown-down and isolation valves. Balancing Valves: 1. 2 Inch and Smaller: See flow sensors above. Automatic Flow Control Balancing Valves: 1. 2. 3. Design Standard Manufacturer: Griswold Controls. Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. Factory calibrate valves for service intended. Valves shall automatically limit flow to the engineered capacity required, regardless of system fluctuations. Valves shall regulate flow within plus or minus 5 percent of their tag rating, over an operating pressure differential of at least 15 times the minimum required for control. Valves shall be tamperproof. Internal working parts shall be passivated stainless steel; self-cleaning, spring loaded with variable orifice area, cartridge-piston type. Bodies shall have tappings suitable for connection of instruments for veri?cation of flow rates; rated for use at not less than 125 psi operating pressures. RECORD DOCUMENTS P9 96? US I: 252mb 5. 15130-9 HEATING AND COOLING PIPING Furnish each valve with a valve kit consisting of inch 2 inch minimum size nipples, disconnect valves (located outside of insulation), and fittings suitable for use with measuring instruments specified. Furnish flow measuring instrument to verify flow rates. Verify correct flow by establishing that operating pressure differential across valve tappings is within range indicated on identification tag. Pressure measuring apparatus shall be portable and consist of a carrying case, instructions hoses, and connections; and pushbutton 3?way valve which transmits either of two pressures to a pressure gauge. Pressure gauge shall have a 4 H2 inch minimum diameter dial calibrated in increments of 1 psi or less, and shall have a range of 44.? psi to +150 psi. Furnish a higher pressure range gauge where system pressure exceeds 125 psi. Upon completion of Work and veri?cation of flow rates, deliver instrument to the Government. 0. Self~Contained Control Valves: Design Standard Manufacturer: Danfoss Series RAV. Substitutions are permitted subject to 1 . 2. 3. 4. Section 01600. Automatic, self?contained, non-electric valve, complete with actuator, thermostatic element, sensor and tubing. ?v?alves: Adjustable temperature range of 50 to 90 degrees operating temperature of 220 degrees and 60 foot water head pressure. Operator: 2 stainless steel bellows with thermostatic element, nickel plated copper sensor and Melmac plastic dial. R. Expansion Compensators and Associated Guides: 2.03 1. Design Standard Manufacturer: KEFLEX. Substitutions subject to Section 01600 are: a. Metratlex. b. Flexonics. c. Other Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. 2 Inch and Smaller: Model brass case with stainless steel bellows rated for minimum working pressure of 150 psi with minimum 1 12 inch compression and 1:2 inch extension. Provide nylon block Model CTG guides. 2 ?2 Inch and Larger: Model M308-1215, 150 psi rated and flanged carbon steel body with tie rods, stainless steel bellows and liner, minimum 1 ?02 inch compression and 1:2 inch {factory set] extension. Provide factory insulated carbon steel spider type guides in accordance with Sections 15060 and 15080. STEAM SYSTEM VALVES AND SPECIALTIES A. Steam Traps: 10l02i?06 l. 3. Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. a. SpiraxlSarco. b. c. Hoffman. d. Peerless Float and Thermostatic Traps: a. ASTM A126, cast iron body and bolted cover for 125 psi provide access to internal parts without disturbing piping; with bottom drain plug, stainless steel capsule type air vent, stainless steel ?oat, stainless steel lever and valve assembly. Spiraerarco Model FT, and Series. b. ASTM A216, steel body and bolted cover for 465 psi provide access to internal parts without disturbing piping; stainless steel capsule type air vent, stainless steel float, stainless steel lever and valve assembly. Spiraerarco Model FT450. Inverted Bucket Traps: a. 2 inch and Smaller (Saturated Steam): Cast iron?body and bolted cover for 250 psi provide access to internal parts without disturbing piping; with top test plug and RECORD DOCUMENTS .ygc. a. 15100?10 E?Eam- G-BGIBUILDIN HEATING AND COOLING PIPING bottom drain plugs. stainless steel bucket. stainless steel seats and piungers. and stainless steel lever mechanism with knife edge operating surfaces. integral inlet strainer of stainless steel. Spirafoarco Model B. 4. Thermodynamic Traps: 800 psi rated. all stainless steel construction. integral strainer. Spiraerarcc Model TD-52. 5. Thermostatic Traps: a. Pressure balance type with brass body and bolted or screwed cover for 125 psi SWP: stainless steel bellows. stainless steel valve and seat: integral stainless steel strainer. b. Freeze proof type with stainless steel body for 300 psi SWP. stainless steel capsule. valve and seat. Spirafoarco Model TSS-21. c. Bi-metallic type with ASTM A105 forged steel body and cover. for 300 psi SWP. bi- metai element with stainless steel components. integral Type 304 stainless steel strainer screen. Spirafoarco Model SM-21. E5. Strainers: 1. Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitled subject to Section 01000. a. Spiraerarco. b. c. Mueller Steam Specialties Company (Muessco). 2. 1 112 Inch and Smaller: Bronze body. threaded ends. pattern with 1!:32 inch stainless steel perforated screen. 250 psi. Spirafoarco Model ST. 3. 2 inch and Larger: Cast iron body. ?anged. pattern with 1:32 inch stainless steel perforated screen. Spirafoarco Model 125 for 100 psi or less: Model 250 for more than 100 psi. 0. Steam AirVents: 1. Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01000. a. Spiraerarco. b. Hoffman. c. 2. 125 psi brass body and cap with access to internal parts without disturbing piping; stainless steel bellows and seat. Spiraxl'Sarco Model T202. 3. 300 psi sealed stainless steel body. Model TTF. 0. Flash Tanks and Legs: 1. Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. a. Penn Separator. D. {Wilson Engineering) Industrial Steam. c. Adamson. 2. Closed type. welded steel construction. tested and stamped in accordance with Section SD of ANSIJASME Boilers and Pressure Vessels Code for 150 psi working pressure; cleaned. prime coated. with steel support legs. Provide nozzles and Iappings for installation of accessories and piping connections. E. Self?Operated Pressure Reducing Valves: 10f02f06 1 . Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. a. Cashco Model 1000 HP-S. b. Spiral-:fSarco. c. Leslie. (1. Spence. Furnish valves with capacity for entering psi and discharge psi as shown. Valve pressure range shall be manually adjustable. Control valve shall be self-operated. single seat. designed for dead and service. and guaranteed to control delivery pressure with a 2 psi plus or minus variation. Valve shall be diaphragm type. bronze. cast iron or steel with stainless steel valve seat. trim and diaphragm. End connections shall be threaded (NPT). Equip valve with a handwheel and locking lever. RECORD DOCUMENTS 262301) P519078 15180-11 HEATING AND PIPING 2.04 F. Safety Relief Valves: 1 . 3. 4. Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subiect to Section 01600. a. Kunkle Valve Company Figure 252. b. Teledyne Farris. c. Lonergan. d. SpiraxiSarco. Size 1 1l2 inch and Smaller; Threaded ends. spring loaded. all brass construction. brass trimmed. Size 2 Inch and Larger. brassi?bronze trimmed. Capacities ASME certified and labeled. Flanged. spring loaded, cast iron [cast steel] construction, G. Drip Pan Elbows: '1 . 2. 3. 4. Manufacturers. Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. a. Kunkle Valve Company Figure 299. b. Grinnell. c. SpiraxiSarco. Size to suit safety relief valve. Provide drain connections at bottom of elbow and pan. Extend elbow pipe 3 minimum of 6 inches inside vent pipe. Material: As specified for safety relief valve. H. Exhaust Head: 1. 2. 3. Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. a. Wright-Austin b. Penn Separator. c. Anderson Separator. Cast iron or carbon steel with 304L stainless steel separating element and screen, 125 or 150 psi flanged. Provide clips for guy wire attachment on sizes 18 inch and larger. EXPANSION JOINTS - STEAM SYSTEMS A. 1 003306 Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. American BOA Series 8150. Type FS. Hyspan. Flexonics. Hoffman Type: Multiply. bellows type. 150 psi. high pressure joint. Single axial expansion joint with fixed forged flanges. shroud cover and limit rods. Nominal Axial Transverse Movement: 3 inches with 1 inch lateral movement. Materials: Bellows: ASTM A240-T321 Flanges: Forged. ASTM A105 or A181 conferming to 316.5. Pipe: ASTM A53 B. Liner: ASTM Shroud: ASTM A36. Guide piping in accordance with manufacturer's published spacing of primary and intermediate guides. RECORD DOCUMENTS I LIE I 252th; PQQUTB cocreurLoI-NG-EI 15180-12 HEATING AND COOLING PIPING PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 INSTALLATION, GENERAL A. B. 3.02 A. B. C. Follow Section 15050 regarding pipe installation procedures and other provisions. Follow Section 01400 for Quality Control of installation. Use valves of same sizes as pipe in which they are installed. except for flow control valves furnished under Section 15900. Provide additional piping when required to connect to Government furnished equipment. Example: Air handling units mayr be purchased in smaller con?gurations than shown on Drawings. INSTALLATION. WATER SYSTEM VALVES AND SPECIALTIES Support tanks inside building from building structure. Pipe air gap fitting on backflow preventer to nearest floor drain. Provide Type 1 air vents and drain valves at system high points and low points outside of mechanical equipment rooms. Provide Type 2 air vents and drain valves within mechanical equipment rooms. Provide each section of isolated piping with air vents and drain valves. Use Type 3 air vents in ceiling spaces and other concealed or non?accessible locations: provide vent tubing to nearest drain. Provide air separator on suction side of system circulalion pump and connect to expansion tank. Provide strainers to protect automatic control valves. Provide full size valved drain and hose connection on strainer blow down connection. Use valves speci?ed for shut-off duty. Where disposable strainer screens are used. remove screen after system has been cleaned and replace with permanent screen. Support pump fittings with floor mounted pipe and flange supports. Locate pumped condensate check valves per manufacturer?s recommendations. Provide relief valves on pressure tanks. low pressure side of pressure reducing valves. heat exchangers and expansion tanks. Select system relief valve capacity so that it is greater than make-up pressure reducing valve capacity. Select equipment relief valve capacity to exceed rating of connected equipment. Pipe relief valve outlet to nearest ?oor drain. Where one line vents several relief valves. make cross sectional area equal to sum of individual vent areas. Locate flow sensors adjacent to balancing valves within manufacturer's guidelines. Provide speci?ed equipment (meters. instruments and related devices] for system balancing. Turn over portable equipment to Balancing Agency in time for scheduled system balance. RECORD DOCUMENTS P953078 15130-13 2623M HEATING AND COOLING PIPING 3.03 CHILLED WATER SYSTEM A. Install tanks level In accessible location B. Accurately align. support and connect piping manifolds. make-up. drain. and condenser water service connections without forcing. C. Mount and wire control panel complete. requiring only connection to electrical power source at panel. 3.04 INSTALLATION. STEAM SYSTEM VALVES AND SPECIALTIES A. Unless otherwise noted. size traps for steam loads indicated at a maximum drop of 1f2 psi for 8. traps and 5 psi for bucket traps. B. Trap sizing assumes condensate at steam temperature. with a 3 to 1 safety factor for equipment. and 2 to 1 safety factor for steam piping drips using 10 percent ?ow. C. Where steam load is not indicated. make trap sizes same as adjoining condensate pipe. 0. Traps used on steam mains and branches shall be minimum 3M inch size. E. install thermostatic steam traps to drain condensate from steam radiation units. convectors and other similar terminal heating units. F, Install float and thermostatic traps to drain condensate from unit heaters. convectors. heating coils. steam separators, flash tanks. heat exchangers. steam jacketed equipment. and direct steam injected equipment. G. Install float and thermostatic traps to drain condensate from steam main headers and branch lines for steam pressure up to 15 psi. H. lnstalt bucket traps to drain condensate from steam main headers and branch lines for. steam pressure above 15 psi. I. Use thermodynamic traps to drain condensate from steam main headers and branch lines for 150 psi steam in tunnel. J. Provide trap stations as shown and as follows: 1. Base of risers. 2. Changes in elevation. 3. Ends of mains. 4. Before control valves. 5 At intervals of 100 feet on mains with pressures of 100 psi and below. 6: At intervals of 250 feet on mains with pressures above 100 psi. K. Traps 1 inch and smaller shall have union connections. Traps ?l 114 to 2 1f2 inch shall have threaded flange connections. All other traps shall have welded flanges. L, Remove thermostatic elements from steam traps during temporary and trial usage. and until system has been operated and dirt pockets cleaned of sediment and scale. M. Install air vents at end of steam mains. and at points in system where air may accumulate. RECORD DOCUMENTS IDEAL: LIE -: 15.13044 CDGIBUILDIN HEATING AND COOLING PIPING N. Pitch (slope) steam and condensate piping one inch in 20 feet minimum in direction of flow. unless otherwise shown. 0. Pressure reducing station shall be one or two stages as indicated, to produce ?at reduced pressure curve over range of capacity. P. Use valves rated for upstream (high) pressure on (low) pressure side of pressure reducing valves, down to and including first valve of safety valve. 0. Install full size valve bypasses in steam gate valve bosses where shown and around equipment service isolation valves larger than 6 inches. R. Mount pressure controller near pressure reducing-valves. Provide piping from controller to sensors and valves. 3. Rate safety relief valves for pressure upstream of pressure reducing station. for full operating capacity. Set relief at maximum 20 percent above reduced pressure. T. Pipe safety relief valves to outdoors. Provide drip pan elbow with drain connection to nearest floor drain. U: When several safety relief valve vents are connected to a common header. header cross section area shall equal sum of individual vent outlet areas. v. Provide exhaust heads on PRV relief vents and CRU vents. W. Steam Expansion Joints: Prior to making final connection of slip joint to pipe, verify required amount of slip compression with manufacturer, to ensure free movement of pipe from installation temperature to minimUm and maximum temperatures. 3.05 FIELD TESTING A. ?l Test installed water and steam piping systems hydrostaticallvI following ANSIIASME 331.9 except that piping beyond the limitations of materials, size, temperature. pressure and service specified in 831.9 shall be tested following 831.1. END OF SECTION RECORD DOCUMENTS P953078 15782-1 ?3'0 AIR COILS PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Coils. piping and accessories. 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01310 - Structural Submittais. 3. Section 15722 Custom Air Handling Units 1.03 SUBMITTALS: Follow Section 01300. A. Shop Drawings: Show coil and frame configurations dimensions, materials. rows. connections, and rough-in dimensions. B. Product Data: Performance data indicating capacities. flow rates. temperatures. and pressure drops. C. InformationalSubmittals: 1. Manufacturer?s installation Instructions. 2. Certificates: Submit certification of coii capacities, pressure drops and selection procedures in accordance with ARI Standard 410. 1.04 QUALITY ASSURANCE: Comply with: A. ANSIIARI 410 - F0rced-Circulation Air-Cooling and Air-Heating Coils. 1.05 DELIVERY. STORAGE AND HANDLING: Follow Section 01600. A. Protect coil ?ns from crushing and bending by leaving in shipping cases until installation and by storing indoors. 8. Protect coiis from entry of dirt and debris with pipe caps or plugs. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.01 MANUFACTURERS A. When coils are an integral part of equipment specified in other Sections; use those manufacturers or approved substitutions. B. Other Coiis: McQuay. Heatcraft. Inc. Carrier. Trane. Aerofin. Temptrol Coil Master Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. 1Gr?02fi36 RECORD DOCUMENTS P519078 IJS 3- 2.02 FABRICATION - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. Extended surface type. coils with copper tubes and plate fins of copper or aluminum. Minimum Tube Thickness for Coils: 0.035 inch. B. Space fins 10 per inch maximum for cooling applications and 12 ?ns per inch for all other applications. C. Maximum Fin Length: 8 feet per section. D. MaximUm Fin Height: 42 inches. E. Maximum Continuous Rows: When rows are required to exceed 8. provide multiple coils in series separated by access sections. F- Headers: Cast iron. copper or steel. Use seamless copper or brass tubes with silver brazed joints on refrigerant coils. Use cast iron or steel on steam coils. (3. Unless otherwise specified. construct channel frame casing. frame structure. eliminators. drip and drain pans of galvanized steel. H. Mount coils in a channel frame casing designed for bolting to other sections of equipment. Mount duct coils. including headers and return bends. entirely within duct casing. I. Provide bolted frame structure to support and allow for individual coil removal. J. For unit mounted coils. provide a 6 inch minimum space on coil discharge for temperature sensing controls. K. Provide cooling coils with 24 gauge moisture eliminators when air velocity exceeds 500 ft.fmin. Provide 20 gauge stainless steel drip pan extending 4 inches from eliminator face. L. Provide stacked cooling coils with 20 gauge drip pans and drain connections to main drain pan. Extend drip pans 3 inches from entering air side of coil face and 6 inches from leaving air side of coil face. Alternate design for draining of stacked coils may be submitted for review. M. Drain Pans: 18 gauge welded stainless steel construction. Cross break and pitch to threaded drain connections. N. Extend cooling coil drain pans under coils. drip pans. headers and return bends. 0. Capacity: As scheduled. P. Provide water coils in a drainable configuration. 2.03 WATER COILS A. Minimum Design: 200 psi and 220 degrees F. Use standard. copper 5?8 inch OD. tubes for air handling units. B. Coils for duct mounted applications must have coil connections on the same side. 2.04 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL A. Factory air test fluid coils under water at minimum design pressure. 1 15752?2 AIR celLs RECORD DOCUMENTS (more? uses 262ath} P991073 1 57132-3 AIR COILS PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 INSTALLATION A. 1 Install air coils in ducts and casings in accordance with SMACNA Standards. Follow Section 15810 Support duct mounted coils independent of ductwork and piping system. Support coil sections on channel or double angle frames, and secure to casings. Arrange supports for cooling coils to avoid piercing or short circuiting drip pans. Bolt casings to other section, ductwork, or unit casings. Provide airtight seal between coil and duct or unit casings. Protect coils to prevent damage to fins and flanges. Comb out bent fins. Install coils level. Install cleanable tube coils with 1:50 pitch. Make connections to coils with unions or flanges. Locate water supply at bottom of supply header and return water connection at top. Provide Type 1 air vents at high points complete with stop valve. Ensure water coils are drainable. Make drain connection at low points On water coils, connect water supply to leaving air side of coil counterflow arrangement. Except where otherwise shown. pipe cooling coil drain pans individually to floor drain with water seal trap. END OF SECTION RECORD DOCUMENTS my; roosc CDCIBUILDING 15310-1 DUCTS PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Ductwork. casings. plenums and accessories. B. Leak testing. 1.02 PRODUCTS INSTALLED BUT NOT FURNISHED UNDER THIS SECTION A. Cut. ?t and install louver blank-out panels furnished under Section 10210. B. (3. Install duct mounted equipment. components and accessories furnished by other Sections of Division 15. Airflow sensor installation will be supervised by manufacturer. Refer to Section 15900. Install smoke detectors. housings and sampling tubes furnished under Section 13350. 1.03 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 15900 a HVAC Instrumentation and Controls 1.04 DEFINITIONS A. C. Duct Sizes: Inside clear dimensions. For lined ducts. maintain sizes inside lining. Humidifier Ducts: 3 feet upstream and 10 feet of humidifier manifolds. Concealed: Not visible to the observer such as in shafts and above ceilings. . Exposed: Visible to the observer such as in mechanical rooms. mechanical galleries. mezzanines and areas Without ceilings. 1.05 SUBMITTALS: Follow Section 01300. A. Shop Standards: 1. 2. Submit shop standards for all systems at least four weeks prior to shop fabrication. Do not fabricate. except from approved submittals. Indicate duct fittings. gauges. sizes. ratings. welds and configurations. Submit assembly and installation instructions for proprietary mechanical duct connection system. B. Shop Drawings: 1Dl02f06 1. 2 531.01 Prepare plans and sections at scale of 1M inch to a foot. Clearly identify deviations from Contract Drawings. Show air outlets. inlets. light fixtures. Structural elements. lintels. partitions and other elements affecting routing of ductwork. Coordinate air device locations with ceiling installer. Show room numbers. names and column lines. Locate roof mounted equipment and penetrations. Detail duct and piping supports- Coordinate proposed installation to provide access for components requiring maintenance. Show details of louver connections. Show details of typical duct to DA plenum connection and detail plenum to structure interface. Shop Drawings. Initial Submission: Submit drawings individually or in pairs as they are completed. RECORD DOCUMENTS PEIQUTB lint-?142 US Cl 2625?in 1.06 A. - 15810-2 DUCTS 8. Re-submissions: a. Make corrections and revisions required by initial submission. Drawings resubmitted without complete corrections and revisions will be returned without review. b. identify revisions. other than those required by initial submission. by circling revised data. duct run or equipment. Samples: Typical weldsl shop fabricated duct fittings and volume dampers. informational Submittals: 1.Certi?cates: Refer to Section 0145? for additional High Containment Pressure Decay Testing. a. Certify that leak testing has been performed and that Work meets speci?ed requirements. Use AABC Form 82500 furnished under Section 15950. b. Certified test data listing sound absorption and transmission loss characteristics of panels for double wall insulated type plenums. DELIVERY, STORAGE AND HANDLING: Follow Section 01600. Close open ends of ductwork with temporary covers. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 A. G. 1 0102! 06 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Drawings indicate general arrangement of work. Carefully examine Drawings and be responsible for proper fit without substantial alteration of indicated layout. Verify dimensions and routing shown with relation to existing construction and work of other trades. Verify locations and interferences prior to fabrication and erection. Leak Testing: recommendations. Specification 0145?. Follow Chapter 23 of 1989 M86 Standards and latest SMACNA Refer also to additional requirements for High Containment areas. Unless otherwise noted, fabricate and install ductwork systems in accordance with: 1. SMACNA Fire. Smoke and Radiation Installation Guide For HVAC Systems. 2. SMACNA Duct Construction Standards. latest edition. 3. 90A - Air Conditioning and Ventilation Systems. Rigidly brace and reinforce ducts with angles or other structural reinforcement members of same material. {Galvanized steel supports may be used to support ductwork systems exposed outdoors, unless noted otherwise.) Make internal ends of slip joints lay with flow. Make ducts straight and smooth inside, with joints neatly finished. Tie rods are not permitted in humidifier ducts. Elbows in Rectangular Ductwork: 1. Square throat elbows larger than 8 inches; double thickness turning vanes. Omit turning vanes from transfer air duct elbows. 2. Securely fasten vanes to runners for quiet, vibration free operation. 3. Square throat elbows 8 inches and smaller; radius elbows. 4. Radius elbows; minimum center line radius of 1 1i2 times dUct width. 5. in parallel flow branches with 8 inch neck and smaller; make turns out of nested fittings with radius elbows. Elbows in Round Duct: 1. Elbow Centerline Radius: 1.5 times duct diameter. RECORD DOCUMENTS IJS '3 262mb} K. 2.02 A. 10f02t'06 15510-3 DUCTS 2. 14 Inch Diameter or Smaller Duct Size: a. 15 and 30 degree elbow: 2 gore segmented. b. 45 degree elbow: Manufactured two piece stamped sweep. c. 90 degree elbow: 5 gores segmented or manufactured two piece stamped sweep. 3. Larger than 14 Inch Diameter Duct: a. 15 and 30 degree elbow: 2 gore segmented. b. 45 degree elbow: 3 gore segmented. c. 90 degree elbow: 5 gore segmented. 4. Welded Miter Elbow: 30 degree maximum- Provide inside collars where registers or grilles are mounted flush to ductwork. Use minimum size collars required to install a controller which will produce uniform air flow over face of register or grille. Holes in Ductwork: 1. Plugs: Niagara Plastics Company "Model 659". Low density polyethylene. snap-in type for 3l'8 inch hole. 2 Test Holes: Ventfabrics "Ventlok Model 699". Size to suit insulation thickness. Provide flat gasket. screw cap and connection hardware in material to suit ductwork. Use concave gaskets for round duct. 3. Duct Penetrations: Where pipes. hangers. conduits or other work must penetrate ductwork. obtain NE acceptance of locations. Provide an airfo? of proper design; increase duct size as required to satisfy each individual condition. Provide gaskets. ?anges and apva sealant to make opening airtight. Where ducts are exposed to weather, locate longitudinal seams on bottom of duct and crossbreak top to shed water. Dissimilar Metals: Make connections using fully gasketted flanges. BASIC MATERIALS Galvanized Steel Ducts: Lock-forming quality sheet. G90 ?nish. ASTM Provide A50 galvannealed where duct surface will be painted. Stainless Steel: ASTM A480 A480 M. Type 304. Finish: NAAMM No. 4. including welds. on exposed surfaces and No. 1 on concealed surfaces. Hanger Rod: ASTM steel. galvanized. threaded both ends. threaded one end. or continuously threaded. Duct Joint Sealant: United "United Duct Sealer." ND substitutions. Duct Sleeves. Sealing Collars and Seals: 1. Round Duct Sleeves: Minimum 20 gauge galvanized steel. 2. Square and Rectangular Duct Collars: Minimum 1 112 inch 26 gauge galvanized steel ?ange. 3. Sealers. Fire Rated Construction: See Section OYB4D. 4. Sealers. Non-Fire Rated Construction: See Section 07900. Flexible Sleeves: lv?entfabrics Inc. "Metaledge Ventglas". No substitutions. 9 inch wide. 30 ouncefsq. yd. glass fabric. double coated with neoprene. flame spread rating of 25. 24 gauge galvanized. Secure with one inch wide. galvanized steel bands and inch (3 mm) stove bolts 5 inches RECORD DOCUMENTS Hill?s-45 us I: .5 sesam- 15310-4 DUCTS G. Retracting Cable Reel: DSP-Monoxivent. the. Model Harvey Industries. Inc. Model 3 2.03 A. 10(02f?6 Skyhook. No substitutions. Provide with stainless steel clamp for flexible ducts and adjustable cable stop. Fasteners and Reinforcement: Rivets. bolts or sheet metal screws. Fastener shall be compatible with material being fastened. Reinforcement shall match material being reinforced.- FABRICATION REQUIREMENTS Ductwork Pressure Classes 1. Supply ductwork from constant volume air handling units to diffusers, registers and grilles. unless noted otherwise: 2 inches w.g. 2. Supply ductwork from variable volume air handling units to air valves and terminal units. unless noted otherwise: 3 inches w.g. 3. Supply ductwork from high containment air handling units through 1005) to air valves: 6 inches w.g. 4. Supply ductwork from air valves and terminal units to diffusers. registers and grilles. unless noted otherwise: 2 inches w.g. 5. Exhaust duclwork from air valves to exhaust fan inlet. unless noted otherwise: negative 3 inches w.g. 6. Exhaust ductwork from HEPA filter housing outlets to exhaust fan inlet through 1038 and through R019): negative 8 inches w.g. Exhaust ductwork from air valves and terminal units to registers and grilles. unless noted othenvise: negative 2 inches w.g. El. Exhaust ductwork from high containment exhaust fan discharge through 1038} to atmospheric discharge: 4 inches w.g. 9. Return air ductwork: negative 3 inches w.g. 10. Other ductwork: 2 inches w.g. Pressure Class: 4 inch negative to 10 inch negative. when any duct side or diameter exceeds 60 inches. 1. Duct Construction Standards: SMACNA Duct Construction Standards. include insulation weight where applicable and minimum 10 superimposed live load in determining critical weights. 2. Rectangular and Round Longitudinal Seam: Continuously welded. 3. Rectangular and Round Transverse Joint; Continuously butt welded or flanged. 4. Bolted barfplate may be used for round. Pressure Class: 4 inch negative to it] inch negative. when no duct side or diameter exceeds 60 inches. Duct Construction Standards: SMACNA HVAC Duct Construction Standards. Include insulation weight where applicable and minimum 10 superimposed live load in determining critical weights. 2. Rectangular Longitudinal Seam: Pittsburgh lock or continuously welded. 3. Round Longitudinal Seam: Lock type; (Spiral). RL-4 (Butt weld or lapped and seam welded) or {Grooved Beam). 4. Rectangular Transverse Joints: Continuoust butt welded, bolted flange or pressure class certified proprietary joint system. 5. Round Transverse Joints: Continuously butt welded. bolted flange. barfplate. pressure class certi?ed proprietary joint system. 6. Seal Class: A for sealed systems; not applicable for welded systems. Pressure Class: 3 inch negative to 10 inch positive. 1. Boot Construction Standards: SMACNA HVAC. 2. Rectangular Longitudinal Seams: Pittsburgh Lock or continuously welded. 3. Round and Flat Oval Longitudinal Seams: Lock type; RL-1 (Spiral). RL-4 Butt Weld or Lapped and Seam Welded or RL-S Grooved Seam. RECORD DOCUMENTS lbiiEiziiE US (3 o-oc-re-urLo-st- 2.04 2.05 2.06 1581 0-5 DUCTS 4. Rectangular Sealed Transverse Joints: Proprietary Joint System for ducts 7? inches and larger. Pocket lock type for ducts smaller than 7 inches. 5. Rectangular Welded Transverse Joints: T-21 (Welded Flange) or T-2?ia (Reinforced . Welded Flange). Tie rods are not permitted in humidifier ducts. 6. Round Sealed Transverse Joints: Proprietary Joint System, (Beaded Sleeve), RT-B (Swedge), or (Beaded Crimp) up to 2 inch maximum. Round Welded Transverse Joints: RT-4 (Outside Sleeve) or Welded Flange. 8. Round Fittings: Slip type. Continuously welded fittings such as conical tees. 45 degree laterals or wyes should be used for continuously welded systems. 9. Seal Class: A for sealed systems; not applicable for welded systems. MECHANICAL DUCT CONNECTION SYSTEM A. D. Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01530. Lockformer Engel Ward Duct Connector Industries. Ductmate IndustriesI Inc. "Ductmaie". Exxano Corporation "Nexus". :1??pr Do not use mechanical connectors on ducts heavier than 16 gauge or lighter than 26 gauge. Products and Materials: 1. Construction Materials: Same as speci?ed for ductwork. 2. Cleat: 20 gauge. Use PVC at fire dampers and connections to dissimilar metals. 3. Corner Clips. Bolts and Nuts: 16 gauge clips or are inch diameter bolts with nuts. Use stainless steel nuts and bolts on dissimilar metals. 4. Gasket: Tremco #440. T00 #1104. Ductmate #440, or Hardcast Use only closed cell neoprene at fire damper break-away joints. Use spin-in takeoff w! damper when tapping for diffusers LABORATORY EXHAUST DUCTWORK A. E. Construction Material: As specified for ductwork with exceptions as follows. Elbows: Make elbows and bends of materials the same gauge as required for straight duct. Seal ductwork airtight with joint sealant. Install point drains at bottom of duct risers in systems handling condensabies. install point drains at ductworlt low points on duct systems exposed outdoors. Connect branch ducts to mains at or above center line. FLEXIBLE DUCTWORK A. 1DIU2IOG MANUFACTURERS: Products listed are approved. Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. Flexible Technologies. Fiexaust. Wagner Corp. Unafiex. Thermaflex. RECORD DOCUMENTS PQQUTS 15810-5 giaglf?f .. CQQIBUILDING DUCTS B. Non-metallic. Exposed to View in Finished Areas: 1. Type 1: Flexible Technologies Model Spiratube neoprene impregnated polyester fabric. enclosed spring steel wire helix. integral liner. 2. Type 2: Flexaust Model Flexadux PVC walled. reinforced spring steel wire helix. blue. C. Non-metailic. Concealed and Unfinished Areas: 1. Type 3: Therrnaflex Insulated type M-KC and non-insulated type UL131, class 1. rated for 6000 velocity. glass fiber cloth. coated spring steel wire helix. 1 inch thick glass fiber insulation with vapor barrier. Use insulated type where required by Section 15080. 2.07 FLEXIBLE METAL DUCTWORK A. Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. 1. Clevaflex Type SFA 2. Iexmaster 3. OmniAir 8. Construction: Ductile aluminum that can be bent and rebent by hand; self-supporting; rated for minimum operating static pressure of 10 inch wg. C. Where insulation is required by Section 15080. factory insulate with 1 inch thick glass ?ber. value of 0.2? at 1?5 degrees F. D. Insulation Outer Jacket: UL listed QIEISS fiber fabric coated with elastomer and laminated to an aluminized polyester mylar ?lm. E. Insulated flexible duct assembly shall carry UL 181. Class 1 duct label. E. Maximum Length: 5 feet. 203 FLEXIBLE ACOUSTIC DUCTWORK A. MANUFACTURERS: Products listed are approved. Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. 1. Flexmaster Type BM 2. Thermaflex. 8. Construction; CPE inner film mechanically locked to galvanized steel helix. Insulation shall provide a maximum overall thermal conductance (c1 of 0.23. Outer vapor barrier shall be a fire retardant reinforced aluminum Flame spread and smoke developed ratings shall not exceed 25 and 50. respectively. C. Insulated ?exible duct assembly shall carry UL 181, Class 1 duct label. D. Insertion Loss: Rated in dB for straight duct. Octave Band Nozero flow 2500 FPM flow zero flow 2500 FPM flow zero ?2500 FPM flow 21 28 29 33 26 12 10f02f06 RECORD DOCUMENTS PQQUTE CDCIBUILDINJ I'Drlfil?r 42 LLS C. 262301: 15810-7" DUCTS E. Radiated Noise Reduction: Rated in dB for straight duct. Octave Band Nozero ?2500 FPM ?zero flow 2500 FPM flow zero flow 2500 FPM flow 6 5 9 13 2.09 ACCESS DOORS A. DESIGN STANDARD MANUFACTURER: AIR BALANCE Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. 3. Material: Minimum 24 gaUge metal. matching material specified for duct. C. Pressure Rating: Suitable for duct pressure classi?cations shown. D. DUCT DOOR LENGTH :11 WIDTH NC- REQUIRED 13 inch and smaller 12 inch DWZ 1 20 inch to 48 inch 18 inch 18 inch 1 50 inch and larger 13 inch x13 inch 2 NOTE: DWZ duct Width minus 2 inches. E. Hardware: 1. Hinges: Wrought steel, zinc plated; brass pins; sized to suit door; minimum two per door. 2. Fasteners: Brass. window sash type; minimum two per door. 3. Pull: Brass; minimum one per door on suction side of fan. F. Reinforce doors with flat or angle iron stiffening frame to avoid racking. Make doors on insulated ductwork of double panel construction with an acceptable type insulated filler not less than 1 inch thick. Frame out duct openings with a continuous reinforcing bar or angle against which door shall close. At insulated ducts, provide an extended metal collar flush with butt face of insulation. Attach gaskets to bar or angle with flameproof adhesive for airtight construction. Attach low pressure doors with at least two hinges. 2.10 DUCT PRESSURE RELIEF DOORS (VERTICAL A. MANUFACTURER: RUSKIN. Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. 13. Construction: 10l02r'06 Material: As specified for ductwork. Frame and Door: Spring loaded, auto reset, 12 gauge minimum. Seal: Polyurethane. Accessories: Round duct adaptors- FWD-3.4 RECORD DOCUMENTS (were 262ath PQQOTE 15810-8 DUCTS C. SETTING INCHES PER 18 18 DOOR (CFM) 3 8500 4 9500 6 12000 2.11 VOLUME DAMPERS A. DESIGN STANDARD MANUFACTURER: RUSKIN models as specified. Substitutions subject to Section 01600 are: 1. American Air Warming. 2. Air Balance. 3. Greenheck 4. Other substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. B. Rigidly construct to eliminate flutter or vibration: exterior quadrant adjustment with looking nut. elevated platform for Insulated ducts and sealed end bearings screwed or riveted to duct. Include open end bearings on ducts beneath elevated platforms to reduce duct leakage. C. Splitter dampers are not acceptable as volume dampers. D. Materials: As specified for ductwork Unless otherwise noted. E. Round 4 Inch to 24 Inch: Model CDRSES F. Rectangular. Smaller than 12 Inch any dimension: Single blade. Model CD35. Use 6 inch 6 inch minimum. G. Rectangular, 12 Inch and Larger any dimension: Multi-blade Model CDBO galvanized, CD50 aluminum and CD30AFI stainless steel. Use 6 inch 6 inch minimum. 2.12 CONCEALED DAMPER REGULATORS A. DESIGN STANDARD MANUFACTURER: Young Regulator Models as speci?ed. Other substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. B. Volume dampers located above inaccessible ceilings shall be provided with a concealed damper regulator with square concealed locking regulator, with calling cup and removable cover plate. Cover plate shall be removed by two machine screws and shall have a primer coated finish for ?eld painting. Young Regulator No. 301. Provide an adjustable cover as required. Young Regulator 315 or 315A. C. Provide a linkage between the concealed regulator and the damper shaft. Vertical shafts shall be Young Regulator 912 and right angle shafts shall be Young Regulator 914. 2.13 FIRE DAMPERS AND SLEEVES A. 10fl12l06 DESIGN STANDARD MANUFACTURER: RUSKIN Models as specified. Substitutions subject to Section 01600 are: Air Balance. Prefco. Greenback Other substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01800. RECORD DOCUMENTS a L- mill-242 US E. 262301; P9 90?3 15810-9 CDCIBU-ILDIN DUCTS B. Floors. Walls and Partitions: Curtain type with blades stored out of air stream. gravity operated for vertical use. and spring operated for horizontal use. 1 02 and 3 hour rated: UL label per UL 555. rated for operation under airflow. 2. Use Model and DIBDZS. Style for low pressure rectangular. Style for medium or high pressure rectangular. and Style CR for round. C. Ceilings: 1. Provide UL classified radiation damper, insulated or non-insulated multi-blade as required for classification. gravity operated. Model CFD and CFDR. 2. Radiation Shield: UL classified ceramic or mineral wool insulating blanket. D. Material: As specified for duclwork. E. Fire Damper Sleeves: Damper manufacturer's metal sleeve with mounting angles. for matching asaembly. 2.14 SMOKE DAMPERS A. Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. Ruskin Model SD50 Low Leakage Smoke Damper. 2. Air Balance. 3. Prefco. 4. Greenback. UL labeled and classified as a Leakage Rated Damper for Use in Smoke Control Systems under UL 5553 (damper and operator). Leakage rating shall be no higher than leakage class I (4 cimfsquare fool at 1 inch wg}. Design and test dampers to operate with differential pressures of minimum 4 inches wg in closed position. and 4000 air velocity in open position. - Qualify dampers and operators to minimum elevated temperature of 350 degrees and meet requirements of NFPA 90A for smoke dampers. Provide spring return (external) type pneumatic operators suitable for 20 psi instrument air pressure. 2.15 ATTENUATOR A. 10102f06 Manufacturers: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600 1. Industrial Acoustics Company. 2. Vibro-Acoustics. 3. United McGill. 4. Transonics. Factory fabricate and test traps in accordance with ASTM E477. Casings: Construct with materials speci?ed for duct system. Outer casing minimum 22 gauge: interior casing (rectangular silencers} minimum 26 gauge perforated. For packed type. provide plastic or mylar encased packing to prevent fume absorption or packing erosion. Packing: Inorganic mineral or glass fiber of density sufficient to obtain speci?ed acoustic performance. Maximum flame spreadfsmoke developediiuel contributed: 25f50f50 when tested in accordance with ASTM E84. NFPA 255 or UL 723. RECORD DOCUMENTS . P99078 15310-10 gill? Duc?rs F. Make units airtight by use of a duct sealing compound. Construct traps to withstand a differential air pressure of 3 inches wg inside to outside of casing. 2.16 DUCT EXPANSION JOINT A. Manufacturer shall be Pioneer Rubber or approved equal subject to Section 01600. B. Expansion bellow material shall be fiberglass fabric liner with a coating of neoprene on both surfaces. Overall thickness shall be inch. 1. Material shall meet the requirements for Class or 1 when tested in accordance with the requirements of UL Standard #181. C. Expansion joint shall be rated for: . Axial compression of 1-1l2 inches. 2. Lateral offset of 1-1l2 inches. 3. Temperature range of: -40 deg. F. to 300 deg. F. 4 Pressure range of: 3 psig continous. D. Expansion joint shall have parallel steel flanges for connection to duct system. E. All steel surfaces shall be painted with shop primer. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 PREPARATION A. Coordinate with concrete. masonry. and gypsum wall board trades as appropriate for through- wall duct sleeves B. install through-wall duct sleeves. 3.02 INSTALLATION A. Assemble. mount. and seal ductwork systems. Install duct and plenum mounted equipment in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. B. Suspend ducts securely. so that under conditions of operation, there will be no vibration. C. Provide openings in ductwork where required to accommodate thermometers and controllers. Provide pitot tube openings where required for testing of systems. D. Holes in Ductwork: 1. Where ducts are insulated. neatly cut a 3 inch wide strip of insulation away from hole site. 2. Drill holes in ducts. casings and plenums not exceeding 12 inches DC in locations as directed by Balancing Agency. 3. Use snap-in plugs for low and medium pressure systems with material gauges of 14 through 28. 4. Use instrument test holes for HEPA filter casings. high pressure and Class 1 systems. and all other low and medium pressure system applications. 5. Reinstall cut away insulation and cover with 4 inch wide duct tape. Identify plug and instrument hole locations on insulated ducts as "test holes" for future reference and use. E. Locate ducts with sufficient space around equipment to allow normal operating and maintenance activities. F. Set plenum doors 6 to 12 inches above floor. Arrange door swings so that fan static pressure holds door in closed position. 10l02l05 RECORD DOCUMENTS PQQUTB .mism us casein,- . 3.03 15810-11 DUCTS Connect ducts to fans with flexible sleeves. Connect air inlets and outlets to low pressure ducts with (5 feet maximum length) flexible or flexible acoustic ductwork. Hold in place with metal strap or clamp. 4. Provide flexible ductwork in laboratory areas. 2. Provide flexible acoustic ductwork in of?ce areas {office towar). Do not use elbows or flexible ductwork within 3 inlet diameters of the inlet-to-air terminal units. Refer to Section 15640. Do not use flexible duct to form elbows or turns exceeding 90 degrees. Use rigid metal duct for such applications. Hang flexible ductwork on 30 inch centers with maximum sag of 1:2 inch per foot. Do not support ducts from ceiling system. Hanging from steel roof or floor decks is approved only when there is at least 4 inches of concrete over deck. Provide supplementary or structural steel as specified in Section 05500. During constrUCtion. provide temporary closures of metal or taped polyethylene on open ductwork, to prevent construction dust from entering ductwork system. Install mechanical duct connection systems in strict conformance with manufacturer's instructions. Over tightening of corner piece nuts and bolts may cause leakage in excess of allowable levels. Install fire dampers in duct extension sleeves and with perimeter angles and breakaway fittings in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and SMACNA details. Provide 120V AC control wiring for smoke dampers back to auxiliary contacts in fan starter. Install access doors at plenums, automatic dampers, temperature and humidity sensors in fan discharges, humidi?ers. control devices fire dampers. smoke dampers, smoke detectors and other locations where access to devices is necessary. Provide access in ducts as required by SMACNA andfor other local code, whichever is more stringent. install access doors both before and after duct moonted in-Iine fans. coils and airflow sensors. Locate doors on duct sidewalls where water or condensation may be present in the airstream. Cut. fit and install blank out panels at portions of louvers not used. Seal seams. perimeter. cut?outs and duct connection. Provide angle closure collars where ducts meet blank out panels. Locate positive pressure relief doors between fan and first fire damper. Provide multiple doors when required to match system capacity. Select doors based on capacity and settings to match duct construction classification shown. Doors shall be insulated and reusable. Doors shall be hinged and open outward. Door relief pressure shall be set 0.5 inches wg above duct construction standards. During adjacent welding protect duct expansion bellows to prevent damage to the flexible material. Align duct sections prior to installation of the expansion joint to insure full lateral motion on both sides of the centerline. DOUBLE WALL INSULATED PLENUM INSTALLATION A. Coordinate interface of building structure, drains and piping penetrations. Install system in such manner to ensure correct function. 0. Seal joints, allowing extrusion of surplus sealer to give visible evidence of complete seal. 1 RECORD DOCUMENTS I Pssors 3 262alh1581042 DUCTS LEAK TESTING The following systems shall be leak tested: 1. Office Tower: NE and Government shall select one system per floor of primary SA ductwork for testing. One secondary air system (supply or return) with an installed ductline of 25 if or more shall also be tested. 2. General Laboratory: NE and Government shall select three exhaust systems to be tested. System shall extend from to exhaust fan on roof. 3. High Containment Labs: NE and Government shall select one (1) exhaust air system. including a maximum of three HEPA ?lter assemblies. from the HEPA assembly to the plenum discharge to outside. Leak test supply air ductwork with pressure class 4 inch wg. up to and including 10 inch wg. Maximum allowable leakage shall be one percent of total air volume. Leak test laboratory exhaust air and return air risers with pressure class 2 inch wg down to 6 inch w.g. Maximum allowable leakage shall be one percent of total air volume. Refer to Section 0145? for High Containment leak testing. Test each system as a whole or in segments as required by progress of work. Use test pressure of pressure-velocity classifications shown, unless otherwise noted. When testing in segments. use the following proportioning method to determine allowable losses for each segment. unless otherwise noted. ALS ALW SFW where: ALS Allowable loss, segment in CFM. ALW Allowable loss, whole system in CFM. SFS Square Feet surface areaF segment of ductwork. SFW Square Feet surface area. whole system of ductwork. Where actual leakage for a segment falls below ALS, excess allowable may be added to other system segments. Provide test blank off plates between each test segment and access doors to permit removal of plates when testing has been completed. Prior to testing, manually remove debris from inside equipment, plenums and ductwork. Do not use fans to remove debris. Verify that duct mounted equipment: accessories and components are installed complete, including access doors as specified. Set tire and smoke dampers in their proper position with "Fire Links" or other devices required for operation, in place and set. Pressure test completed ductwork system before ductwork is insulated and concealed. Retest systems found to be incomplete during initial test. If tests show ductvvork system leakage is greater than allowed, reseal and retest until allowable leakage is not exceeded. If, by test, pressure drop across ductwork fittings and duct mounted devices furnished under other Sections exceeds by 10 percent the pressure drop ratings listed in SMACNA HVAC Duct System DesignI inspect inside ductwork ?ttings and devices, and report ?ndings to NE. lf fittings and devices do not have access doors, out inspection openings in ductwork. and RECORD DOCUMENTS I Jli3l.42 252mb; lbllal 42 Ll E. g. .. 1399078 .QDQisutLoiN 3.05 15810-13 DUCTS provide airtight access covers secured with sheet metal screws. Repair or replace fittings and devices. and retest until allowable pressure drop is not exceeded. A. DUCTWORK SYSTEM SERVICE 1 Vented sink exhaust Shower and locker room exhaust Humidifier ducts Cagewash, tunnelwash. sterilizer, autoclave. and other connected exhaust Ductwork (supply and general exhaust) Exposed in finished laboratory areas Laboratory exhaust risers All exhaust ductwork in inaccessible Locations (above gypsum ceilings such as above BSLS lab areas. Laboratory exhaust ductwork exposed on the roof. Laboratory exhaust ductwork exposed to. outdoore. . . I Outside air intake ductwork plenums All other ductwork NOTES: DUCTWORK APPLICATION AND MATERIAL SCHEDULE MATERIAL (NOTES) Stainless Steel (23(4) Stainless steel Quail-1) Stainless Steel (1M4) Stainless Steel Stainless Steel (1) Stainless Steel (1) Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel (5) Double wall galvanized steel ductwork with 2" duct liner and woven fiberglass fabric liner. interior liner panel shall be perforated except floor panels shall be solid. Galvanized Steel 1. Continuously welded joints. seams and connections. 2. Continuously welded joints. seams and connections on vertical ducts. For horizontal ducts: Continuously weld joints; continuously weld seams and connections on bottom and sidewall; seal seams and connections on top. 3. Slope horizontal ductwork back to grilles or equipment or provide valved drain connections at low points of system. 4. Continue ductwork material until connection to a main with at least 200% more airflow. 5. Construction as defined on the Drawings. END OF SECTION RECORD DOCUMENTS PQQUYB (more use. 2622501} 15340-1 AIR TERMINAL UNITS PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Variable Volume (W) Units. B. Constant (VG) Units. C. Powered Induction (PIU) Units. D. Laboratory SuppIyIExhaust (W) Valves I E. High Containment Lab Units. 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 15762 Air Coils B. Section 15900 HVAC Instrumentation and Controls I 1.03 DEFINITIONS A. Unit: Completer assembled configuration including sensor-controller. coil, ?lter and fan where applicable. 1.04 SUBMITTALS: Follow Section 01300. A. Product Data; 1. Submit data for all units only. Schedule for generic units will not be reviewed. 2. General: Indicate type of sensor~control er and actuator to be used. Include minimum operating system static pressure requirements. unit dimensions. construction material. and air piping and wiring details. 3. Sound Performance Date a. Schedule sound power levels in second through seventh octave bands and differential pressures in increments of: Minimum required. 0.50, 1.5 and 3 inch. b. Schedule radiated and discharge (or inlet) sound. c. Schedule only raw data. Make no allowances for room ceiling. acoustic iner or other such inappropriate allowance. B. Informational Submittals.? 1. Manufacturer's installation instructions. 2. Certificates: Certify that units have been factory set and that work meets or exceeds specified requirements. 3. Operation and Maintenance Data: Include descriptive literature, operating instructions and maintenance and repair data Include directions for resetting constant volume setpoints. 4. Special Warranty: Warrant components of Laboratory Supplyi Exhaust (W) Valves for a period of three years from the date of shipment. 1.05 DELIVERY. STORAGE AND HANDLING: Follow Section 01600. A. Protect sensor-controller from dirt and moisture. '1 010305 RECORD DOCUMENTS US I: 4} E?galhg PSI-3078 . 15840-2 AIR TERMINAL UNITS PART ZPRODUCTS 2.01 2.02 MANUFACTURERS: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. A. Variable Volume 0N) and Constant Volume (VG) Units: P?FnPf-?Jh?Tuttle E: Bailey. Anemostat. Environmental Technologies. Price. Titus Trane wer Induction Units: Environmental Technologies. Anemostat. Price. Trane. Titus. C. Laboratory Supply Exhaust Units (W): F'hoen ix. D. High Containment Lab Units (LV): 1 . Follow Section 15900. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: VARIABLE AIR VOLUME, CONSTANT VOLUME AND POWER INDUCTION UNITS A. Fabrication: 1. Casing Material: Steel. ASTM lock forming qualityI (300 galvanized for galvanized duct systems and ASTM A240. Type 304 stainless steel for stainless steel duct systems. Use Type 304L when unit connections will be welded to ductwork. Follow SMACNA standards and Section 15810. Casing Liner: Where permitted, use 1.5 pound density glass ?ber in conformance to NF PA 90A. Provide-1 inch thick neoprene or vinyl coated liner for W?s. VC's and PlU?s. Leakage a. Casing Leakage: Maximum 1 percent of flow at 2 inch w.g. b. Damper Leakage: Maximum 3 percent of flow at 4 inch w.g. Coordinate function of required controls and determine normal position with sequence of operation indicated on Control Drawings. Provide positive positioners on units sequenced with other equipment. Coordinate controller location and orientation with sheet metal shop drawings to provide access for service. Reheat Coils: Hot water type as specified in Section 157?62. Mount coils. including headers and return bends. entirer within insulated casing. Provide access panel in bottom of unit casing to service water coils. Factory set airflow requirements for each unit as shown. Use airflow across sensor to determine setpolnt. Maximum NC level scheduled: Based on maximum airflow with differential pressure of . 2.0 inch static pressure. Sound pressure level shall not exceed specified NC curve at any frequency band. Minimum static pressure requirement for controllable airflow shall not exceed 0.40 inch w.g. E. 361150 r-Control IE (5: 1. ?l 01?02106 Where electronic DDC is scheduled. factory install complete controls incorporating electronic damper actuators and TCU controllers furnished by Section 15900. RECORD DOCUMENTS P953078 1 5340-3 AIR TERMINAL UNITS tortoise use. is 2.03 2. Controls: a. Pressure independent. externally powered. consisting of inlet sensor. volume control damper. damper actuator and controllers. to. Use differential pressure regulator signals from an averaging type inlet sensor to control accuracy and repeatability to within plus or minus 5 percent of scheduled ?ows from minimum operating pressure to 6 inches w.g. c. Mount unit controls in a protective enclosme. d, Separate DP Taps: Mount separate. external differential pressure laps to be used exclusively for air flow measurement with a 0?2 inch gauge. a. Flow Chart: Mount a calibration flow chart within sight of gauge taps. Variable Volume (W) Units 1. Provide volume control damper; 1 inch thick neoprene or vinyl coated liner. Normally open i closed damper position shall be as defined on the drawings. 2. Sequence of Operation shall be as defined on the Drawings. Constant Volume Units 1. Provide normally closed supply and normally open exhaust volume control damper: 1 inch thick neoprene or vinyl coated liner Power Induction {PlUl Units 1. Casing: Minimum 22 gauge insulated type with access panel for removal of fan and motor. 2. Fan and Motor: Rubber isolated assembly consisting of single or multiple. forward curved centrifugal fans. direct driven with multi-speed. permanent split capacitor. thermal overload protected motor. 3. Filter: One inch thick replaceable, panel type located in the induced air inlet. 4. Control Panel; Follow Section 15050. Factory wired fan motor starting equipment with fused disconnect switch. control transformer. air pressure switch. electronic controller. electronic fan speed controller and 3-speed selector switch. Locate speed selector switch on panel face. 5. Provide normally open volume control damper; sound attenuator: density. neoprene or vinyl coated liner. 6. Differential pressure inlet sensor (for flow measurement}: Pipe to pneumatic controller with "tea" connection on high signal line to air pressure switch. Sequence of Operation. Shall be as defined on the Drawings. 8. Maximum radiated sound power levels based on a maximum of 2 inch inlet pressure. 100 percent primary air. and Without corrections or allowances shall be as follows: 1 inch thick. 4 lb. UNIT SIZE MAX CFM FREQUENCY BAND NUMBER 103 1000 63 62 56 49 43 39 12B 1200 66 59 55 47 43 41 14A 1400 65 61 54 48 44 LABORATORY SUPPLY i? EXHAUST UNITS A. The airflow control device shall be a venturi valve. 8. The air?ow control device shall be pressure independent over its speci?ed differential static 1 (HOME pressure operating range. An integral pressure independent assembly shall respond and maintain specific airflow within one second of a change in duct static pressure irrespective of the magnitude of pressure andior flow change or quantity of airflow controllers on a manifolded system RECORD DOCUMENTS P9907B US It 15840-4 CDCIBUILDING AIR TERMINAL UNITS C. The airflow control device shall maintain accuracy within plus or minus 5 percent of signal over an airflow turndown range of no less than 16 to 1. No minimum entrance or exit duct diameters shall be required to ensure accuracy andror pressure independence. D. The airflow control device shall be constructed of one of the following: 1. Class A: The airflow control device for non-corrosive airstreams such as supply and general exhaust shall be constructed of 15 gauge aluminum. The device's shaft and shaft support brackets shall be made of 315 stainless steel. The pivot arm and internal mounting link shall be made of aluminum. The pressure independent springs shall be a spring grade stainless steel. All shaft bearing surfaces shall be made of a Teflon. or polyester. or PPS (polyphenylene sulfide) composite. Sound attenuating devices used in conjunction with general exhaust or supply airflow control devices shall be constructed using 24 gauge galvanized steel or other suitable material used in standard duct construction. No sound absorptive materials of any kind shall be used. 2. Class (Fume Hoods only): The airflow control device for corrosive airstreams such as fume hoods shall have a' baked-on corrosion resistant phenolic coating. The device's shaft shall be made of 316 stainless steel with a Teflon coating. The shaft support brackets shall be made of 315 stainless steel. The pivot arm and internal mounting link shall be made of 315? or 303 stainless steel. The pressure independent springs shall be a spring grade stainless steel. The internal nuts. bolts and rivets shall be stainless steel. All shaft-bearing surfaces shall be made of a Teflon or polyphenylene sul?de composite. F. Supply air valves shall be insulated with flexible closed-cell polyethylene with a density of 2.0 Flame spread rating shall be no more was G. Operation: 1. For VAV operation. a pneumatic actuator shall be factory mounted to the valve. Loss of pneumatic main air or control power shall cause normally open valves to fail to maximum position. and normally closed valves to fail to minimum position. 2. For two-position operation. a pneumatic actuator shall be factory mounted to the valve. Loss of pneumatic main air or control power shall cause normally open valves to fail to maximum position. and normally closed valves to fail to minimum position. Provide a solenoid switch to switch between minimum and maximum positions. 5. Constant volume valves do not require actuators. H. Acoustic Performance Octave Eland NoDischarge Sound Performance Data 1.0" pressure drop 5? valve 500 CFM 55 64 63 54 55 50 '12? valve 500 CFM 53 59 54 51 56 53 2-12? valve 1200 CFM 51 5? 55 52 55 52 2-12" valve 2000 (Exhaust Sound Performance Data 1.0" pressure drop 8" valve 500 CFM 54 53 59 50 5.1 44 12" valve 300 CFM 52 5? 50 52 51 50 2-12? valve 1200 CFM 50 53 50 52 49 44 2-12? valve 2000 CFM 55 59 55 55 54 54 Dynamic Insertion Loss Performance Data 1.0? pressure drop 3? valve 600 CFM 1 2 1 1 1 2 12" valve 800 CFM 2-12" valve 1200 CFM 3 3 4 5 5 7' 2-12" valve 2000 CFM 0302106 RECORD DOCUMENTS P99078 @9ng USE 2623 15840r5 in AIR TERMINAL UNITS I. Certification: 1. Each airflow control device shall be factory calibrated to the job speci?c airflows as detailed on the plans and specifications using NIST traceable air stations and instrumentation having a combined accuracy of at least plus or minus 1 percent of signal over the entire range of measurement. Electronic air?ow control devices shall be further calibrated and their accuracy veri?ed to plus or minus 5 percent of signal at a minimum of eight different airflows across the full operating range of the device. All airflow control devices shall be individually marked with device speci?c, factory calibration data. As a minimum, it should include: Tag number, serial number. model number. eight point characterization information (for electronic devices). and quality control inspection numbers. All information shall be stored by the manufacturer for use with as-built documentation. PART 3 - EXECUTION INSTALLATION A. Support units individually from structure independent of duct system. 8. Hanging from steel roof decks with rigid board insulation is not permitted. Hanging from steel roof and floor deck is permitted only when there is at least 4 inches of concrete over deck. Hanging from electrified floor deck is not permitted under any circumstances. 3.01 C. D. 3.02 A. B. C. 1 DID 2/06 Install horizontal units level in both planes with control enclosure located on side of unit. Coordinate location of control enclosure for accessibility. Conform with manufacturer?s instructions regarding controller orientation. The BAS contractor shall install 20 psi clean. dry pneumatic supply air to all pneumatic control devices. System start-up shall be provided by a factory authorized representative. SYSTEM STARTU-UP AND TRAINING {Laboratory Supply Exhaust (W) Valves) Start?up shall include electronic verification of airflow. The balancing contractor shall be responsible for final verification and reporting of airflows. Operation and Maintenance manuals. including as-built wiring diagrams and component lists. shall be provided for each training attendee. END OF SECTION RECORD DOCUMENTS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION: SPECIFIED DISSEMINATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 Anpendix Drawinq and MechanIcaI Cutsheels Hugo MODIFIQATIONS .. I Title Sheet 42 2523Ih': APPENDIX DRAWING AND MECHANICAL CUTSHEETS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Page 1944 use. 252mm Page 1945 USE. 262a{h: Page 1945 {way-42 use. 262a{h) TEMPLATE . Dam-mm mam; Log Paguim?i DQQUM gm IRAC Project: Contracting Of?cer: Contract No; Document Transmitted Document Ralumed . Data [Joann enirs] Descriplion Transmitl ed By Transmitted To Returned By ?animal? Ind DENIM hr hate Discipline Date Tn mm CDC- [quanlzatlnn and Person] [Olga niullun and Person] [Granulation and Parson] CD mar-inns. mamas cmuo F's Fm? puma Comrade: Refer In drive [or exact as. a?ga-?umw ?#123456? Prime Mechanica'l 1.1 Mechanical drawing: CD ROM HEROES Mechanical M's Mach an'cal L's. Lands-nape 1.1.1 Plumbing drawing CD ROM mans La. 4E4-123r45? M's Mechanics: G?s. Central: inc. 1.1.2 Carin-oldan ?le CD ROM MEWS Nil-123455? 776-123-456? P's Prime Ganstrumidn F's Flaming 1.2 Flour Plan drawing ?le CD ROM H2N2U95 Carpal Nil-121456? 45:36:39 - - - P's Prime cansimctfon 2 Final? Slit Plan frat?? ?zz-3005 Flimer Ca ntraclur Wm? ?mm? x. 494-sar-3m Tin-123455? - - - P's Prima M's Manna?ical 2.1 ?9st? 3 memos Hechanlcal ?mm? via-123.455? - - . - - M's Mechanical Lan ix: 1: 23.1 331:3 Site- plan (lawman; 1 set pnnted EJ232005 Landscape 770-123-455? d?ddZB??b?? . - - - . M's Marthaan Gmd'n 2112 Elan draw-mug! 5 5e. I Grading Fm? mm?) Till-123455? 779-123-456? - - - G's Gmd'n A's Shnrin 11.21 Fig-Is: :le Elan draan [4 sets EJ232005 I SI I: am ring ?We ?"951 710.123.4515? 1.1.11.1 Rttwise site plan drawing-1 1 sat a?lmws N5 snoring 3?35 Urden'?llat Fm"311 A smuusar cc 4M-QET-4 551 2'13 Hgvia site pian drawingl 1 set $232005 Mmham?a' Undemmund Undurgmugd Utility ?raw-?951? Will-123455? tJ HMIHSET Ln? SCROLL TD RIGHT FOR NUMEERING EXAMPLE Printer}: HERD 12 a! mat: AM Maths. Chester (coorocooirosaP) From: Probst. Paul E- (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Saturday. July 2010 8:09 PM To: Walpole Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) . . .. .. Floor Control Panel FYI. I did not copy others hoping she will take my message as friendly advice. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCODIBFO) To: Moss, Karen ant: Fri MI 181 :31:03 2010 :12 .S 252st. SuLIfiect-z Floor Control Panel Karen: control panel has no additional capacity. When we discussed fan control and VFD back in May and early June. I thought we put to rest any control modi?cations to existing sequence of operation for the fan pair set- That being the case. I do not understand why it matters if there is additional capacity at that paneL Through the grapevine. I understand that there is a possibility that an operating scenario of a single fan is being considered. If true, this is not an avenue that is recommended and will be met resistance due to lab safety concerns and risks that will be presented upon operating fan failure. Paul Probst. PE Asst. Din. Operations BFOiFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Office 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 3:02 PM To: Bow an L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) ili'li3i?51tb . .. .. EW: .. Vivarium Const. Schedule i Thanks, Paul 404-839-0505 From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 7:55 AM To: Daniels, Ch - E. BVivarium Const. Schedule Charles: The November ?l start date was not solidi?ed until sometime in July after it was determined that a contractor NTP date of September would be achieved via performing project using SOC method. Thanks. Paul 404-639-0505 From: Daniels, Charles E. Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 11:37 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Daniels, Ch 5 E. tbil3iiS5lJll1%?Et: Const. Schedule 202aih Paul: This appears the ?rst time that the H06 was made aware ofa project schedule. Did the HOG selectNovember 1 as a start date then or later? Thank you From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 ?:22 AM To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Raymond, George (CDCIDCODIBFO): Bowen, Ken L. (CD Walpole, Kenneth K. Daniels, Charles E. (CDCJOCOOXBFO) ivarium Const. Schedule a Ail: The construction schedules as presented by Willis Mechanical were presented at the HOG on Thursday. It was noted to the HOG Team that Willis had developed Best and Worst Case scenarios regarding shutdown durations, and that those windows were 22 days and 35 days respectively. It was also noted that the earliest that the work could begin was November orne earlier Ilbtt?i II indica ed that pace However, mid-November represents the date of the scheduled annual shutdown of the: OHS, expressed the desire to have the project occur as soon as possible as the currently operating scenario is undesirable relative to the proposed changes. Laura indicated later in the day, outside of the meeting, that she would be open to the possibility of having the: shutdown prematurer occur in September to clearithe we}.r for the November 1 start. Her proposal is currently under consideration. .i Regards, 252mm - 4: Us I. 252.34? In 42 [meme Us 232311.. Paul PbeSt 252mm Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: [bj-iBEElia-2152023011: Sent: Friday. dotober 29, 2010 2:51 PM - Probst, Paul . Vivarium?Project Great! Have a good weekend. From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCODIBFO) Sent: Frida October 29, 2010 2:50 PM To: ibilsiie?ll??qtt?lii Bui?ing- Vivarium Project zas'a'im'? Just talked to George. I will be there. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 . It- . CDCIOIDINCZVED) Sent: Friday, ctober 29, 2010 2:50 PM I To:_Probst, Paul E. COOIBFO) 'ivarium Project You are the building engineer. but I will let George sort It out. ??-?Origina Appointment-m- From: Probst, Paul E. Se a. 29, 2010 2:35 PM I NCZVED) wins};th ivarium Project Eman: Tuesday, November i 010 1:00 PM (GMT ~05 :00) Eastern Time (US Canada). Where: TBD - (will ID a suitable room Monday) Considering the high pro?le nature of the meeting, [yield to the discretion of George Chandler as to who should represent BFO. It may be best for him to want to leave it small. Therefore. 1 am checking ?tentative?. Paul Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 2:50 PM To: Sanchez, An yr (CDCIOIDINCEZID) RE. Building wanum PFOJEOIL Just talked to George. I will be there. Thanks. Paul 404-539-0505 b_lt3}2112 LLS {a 252mm Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 2:50 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (C I COOIBFO) Vivarium You are the building engineer. but I will let George sort it out. -?-?Original Appointmenth From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Frida October 29, 2010 2:35 PM I lbil?ii Building?ivarium Project Ewel??mmesday, November 010 1:00 rem-2:00 PM Eastern 'nme (us a Canada). Where: TBD (will ID a suitable room Monday) Considering the high pro?le nature of the meeting, I yield to the discretion of George Chandler as to who should represent BFO. it may be best for him to want to leave it small. Therefore, larn checking "tentative". Paul Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: use. 252aih; Sent: iday, October 29. 2010 2:50 PM To: Probst, Paul {loll?igm?t RE: Building Uivarium Project a are the building engineer: but I will let sort it out. ?-?-Original Appointment--?? From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Frida October 29, 2010 2:35 PM To: I I NCZVED) ivarium Project n: Tuesday, November - 010 1:00 PM (GMT-05 :00) Eastern Time (US Canada). Where: TED (will ID a suitable room Monday) Ibh3?242 252mm Considering the high pro?le nature of the meeting, I yield to the discretion of George Chandler as to who should represent BFO. It may be best for him to want to leave it small. Therefore, I am checking "tentative". Paul Marthe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday. October 29. 2010 2:45 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Meeting to discuss schedule Thank you From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 2:36 PM To: Moss, Karen Subject: RE: P2009453 Meeting to discuss schedule Karen: We will be meeting in Room 2202. May need to update invite. Room phone number is Thanks. Paul 404-6390505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 11:2? AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 Meeting to discuss schedule Do you know the phone number for the conference room, see below from PGO. Appointment?n- From: Mickie, Lenore (CDCXOCOOKPGU) Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 11:23 AM To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCDOKBFO) Subject: Accepted: P2009453 Meeting to discuss schedule When: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 ?:30 AM (GMT-05 :00) Eastern Time (US 3. Canada). Where: Roybal 21 Room 2135 i can hook up with you guys via phone, because I need to telework on Tuesday since lime" IibziE: I Please let me know a number to call, as my phone is temperamental. Thanks, Lenore Mickie CS for Branch Buildings 3: Facilities Contracts Branch Procurement 8; Grams Of?ce 770-488?2623 Mathe, Chester From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 2:36 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Meeting to discuss schedule Karen: We will be meeting in Room 2202. May need to update invite. Room phone number is Thanks, Paul 404?639-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 11:27 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 Meeting to discuss schedule Do you know the phone number forthe conference room, see below from PGO. Appointment--?-- From: Mickle, Lenore (CDCIOCOOJPGO) Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 11:23 AM To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: Accepted: P2009453 Meeting to discuss schedule When: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 2:30 AM Eastern Time (US 8L Canada). Where: Roybal 21 Room 2135 I can hook up with you guys via shone, because I need to telework on Tuesday since Please let me know a number to call, as my phone is temperamental. Thanks, Lenore Mickie CS for Branch IX Buildings 3: Facilities Contracts Branch Procurement 8.: Grants Ol?cc 270-488-2523 Ianickle @cdc.gov mei} Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Friday, Ootober29, 2010 1:14 PM To: Moss. Karen Subject: RE: P2009453 Meeting to discuss schedule Karen: just realized that I may be misunderstanding the room needs. Do we need to big room downstairs or the smaller one on the 2H Floor? Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 11:27 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: FW: P2009453 Meeting to discuss schedule Do you know the phone number forthe conference room, see below from PGO. Appointment-m- From: Mickie, Lenore Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 11:23 AM To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIUCDDIBFO) Subject: Accepted: P2009453 Meeting to discuss schedule When: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 2:30 Aid-9:00 AM Eastern Time (US 81 Canada). Where: Roybai 21 Room 2135 lea" ?00k ?13 With YOU EWS Via phone, because I need to telework on Tuesday I Please let me know a number to call, as my phone is temperamental. Thanks, Lenore Mickie CS for Branch IX Buildings Facilities Contracts Branch Procurement3t O?ice 770?488-2523 Lmickle@cdc.gov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 11:27 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 Meeting to discuss schedule Do you know the phone number for the conference room, see below from PGO. ?--v0riginal From: Mickie, Lenore Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 11:23 AM To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: Accepted: P2009453 Meeting to discuss schedule When: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 2:30 Ara-9:00 AM (GMT-05 :00) Eastern Time (US Canada). Where: Roybal 21 Room 2135 hone, because i need to telework on Tuesday must ease call, as my phone is temperamental. Thank; Lenore Micklc CS for Branch IX Buildings 3: Facilities Conn-acts Branch Procurement 8: Grants Of?ce 770-438-2623 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Daniels. Charles E. (CDCIOGODIBFO) Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 8:31 AM To: Prob _aul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: 3 Ivarium Const. Schedule Paul: Thank you ibigizy?gasgsa: Re:- ?202ai From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIUCOOJBFD) Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 7:55 AM To: Daniels, Ch 5 E. ivarium Const. Schedule Charles: The November 1 start date was not solidi?ed until sometime in July after it was determined that a contractor NTP date of September would be achieved via performing project using SOC method. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Daniels, Charles E. Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 11:32 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Daniels, Ch rle E. (CDCIOCODIBFD) Subject: RE: iivarium Const. Schedule 42 Paul: This appears the first time that the HOG was made aware of a project schedule. Did the HOG select November 1 as a start date then or later? The hit you From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 7:22 AM . To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. (CD Walpole, Kenneth K. Daniels, Charles E. ?Vivarium Const. Schedule All: The construction schedules as presented by Willis Mechanical were presented at the HOG on Thursday. It was noted to the HOG Team thatWillis had developed Best and Worst Case scenarios regarding shutdown durations, and that those windows were 22 days and 35 days respectively. it was also noted that the earliest that the work could begin was November 1 . Based on TB program input, the start date of November 1 has no ?exibility - he could vacate the space no earlier than November 15'. Laura Zambuto i Mgw?swr?ere she will move her operation to duringn of the Vivarium. However, mid?November represents the I 2323's; ateof OHS. Bill Howard. expressed the desire to have the project I occur as soon as possible as the currently operating scenario is undesirable relative to the proposed changes. a . 5:15 $5.93 Laura indicated later in the day, outside of the meeting, that she would be open to the possibility of having the shutdown prematurely occur in September to clear the way for the November ?1 start. Her proposal is currently under consideration. Regards. Paul Probst Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) I From: Probst, Paul E. 5 Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 7255 AM i To: Dani harles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) I lblliggm??m RE: ?iva?um Cor-15L Schedule Charles: The November 1 start date was not solidi?ed until sometime in July after it was determined that a contractor NTP date of September would be achieved via performing project using SOC method. Thanks, Paul 404?839-0505 From: Daniels, Charles E. Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 1&3? AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Daniels, Ch?j E. {bli31: B. ivarium Const. Schedule 2625101, Paul: This appears the first time that the HOG was made aware of a project schedule. Did the HOG select November 1 as a start date then or later? Thank you From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 7:22 AM To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. (co Walpoie, Kenneth K. Daniels, Charles E. . I Vivarium Const. Schedule All: The construction schedules as presented by Willis Mechanical were presented at the HOG on Thursday. It was noted to the HOG Team that Willis had developed Best and Worst Case scenarios regarding shutdown durations, and that those windows wage 22 days and 35 days respectively. It was also noted that the earliest that the work could begin was November 1 . Based on TB program input, the start date of November 1 has no ?exibility indicated that he could vacate the space no earlier than November 15?. Laura Zambuto of -. . . 0'5 I she will move her operation to durinn of the Vivarium. However, mid-November represents the 262a?:- date otthe scheduled annual shutdown"'of'the OHS, Bill Howard, expressed the desire to have the project occur as soon as possible as the currently operating scenario is undesirable relative to the proposed changes. Laura indicated later in the day, outside of the meeting, that she would be open to the possibility of having the - . shutdown prematurely occur in September to clear the way for the November 1 start. Her proposal is currently under consideration. Regards, Paul Probst lb:le J: 252.30?- lbtiB: 42 Maths. Chester From: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 ?:33 AM 5 Bowen. Ken L. Raymond, George .-. . Modi?cations Look whatl pulled out of my Archived E-Mail. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Chandler, George Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 10:08 AM To: Moss, Karen Sanchez, Anthony Cc: Tanya A. Daniels, Charles E. Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. .DCIOCOOXOHS) Sbbject: RE: P2009453 - HVAC Modi?cations Thank you, Karen! G, 252.301;- From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 9:35 AM To: Sanchez, Anthony (CDCJOIDINCZVED) Cc: Tanya A. Daniels, Charles E. Williams, Jeffery Chandler, George Probst. E. Gaunce, Jean A. gi??i??i?ZQ?Qt?E?e .. .. HVAC Modi?cations You have been designated as the point or contact [see below} for all communications regarding the HOG forthe above referenced project. Any project information that may affect the will be funneled through you for circulation and coordination among the HOG members. Likewise, please ensure that you share with me any input from HOG members that may affect this project. The schedule put forth in the recent HOG directive is very aggressive. Good communication and coordination among all are critical if we are to execute a successful project. Also, please relay this revised means of communication to all HOG members. Thank you, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: rte-43 8-330? Cell: 404325?632? Fax: Tito-488466? email: KMossI cricnov From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 5:11 PM To: Nicholson, Janet (cocororoo); (cocrolomczveo); Bowen, Ken L. (coczocoorBFO); Williams, Jeffery Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCJOCOOIOHS) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Subject: RE: P2009453 HOG Directive Thanks, Jan! G.- From: Nicholson, Janet Sent: Frida March 12 2010 2:32 PM To: Ibiocuscs2e2aiht Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Je ery OCOOIBFO): Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Subject: Re: P2009453 - HOG Directive Tony is the appropriate contact. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device USE. To: Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Sent: Fri Mar 12 13:52:42 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 HOG Directive George, 1 am happy to be the P00 for Karen on this project, but would leave the ultimate decision up to Jan. Thanks for your assistance. From: Chandler, George (COCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:48 PM . To: Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Nicholson, Janet Gaunce, Jean A. (CDCIOCOOIOHS) Cc: Blanchard, Thomas M. Tanya A. Monroe, Steve Subject: RE: P2009453 - HOG Directive (cocroromczveo); Friends: I hope there is no basic misunderstanding of BFO's support for the project and decision to move forward as requested by OHS and the HOG. Karen is trying to follow our SOP to keep affected parties informed on the project and to solicit information that might affect scope, schedule and budget. I have been informed that there are dissenting voices on this project and that some Program folks feel that their concerns have not been addressed. At the same time, I am fully aware that OHS and the Program have used a process to generate this project request, and that there can be dissenting voices as long as the dissenter?s legitimate concerns have been taken into account- it is not intent to intrude deeply into Program issues just to clearly communicate what is going on relative to the Project. So, Jan, if there is a single POO for Karen to solicit Program input from and to disseminate project information back to the Program, please designate herlhim if you have not done so already. Please be advised that this POO will be responsible for and will need to handle internal communications and coordination for all affected Program components in order for BFO to have a chance of meeting most of the scope and schedule on this Discuss? Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCDOIBFG) Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 12:50 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium 0k. Understood. This should be discussed at the next meeting (which I believed is'scheduled for next Wednesday]. Though this meeting will be focused on schedules, these topics should be included and discussed in detail since they ultimately impact schedule durations. jeff From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2010 12:11 PM To: Williams, Jeffery Subject: Vivarium Jeff: Pollowing up from this morning, I have two items with regards to current customer concerns: 1. Test and Balance Duration based on experience gathered in the Payne School of Expediting, a suggestion might be toconsider a second test and balance proposal. May save considerable time. 2. There is the potential that we may have additional technical discussion when the Air Flow Balance diagram is shared with OSHE. i spent time with Bill H. a this morning discussing some particulars. and we all realized that we are unclear about the plan, past discussions, and advantagesldisadvantages as they relate to certain space in the area and its adjacent pressure relationships. This could be a precursor of things to come. Paul PE Asst. Dir., Operations BFOlFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404285-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCODIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday. Gctober28, 2010 12:11 PM To: Williams, Jeffery (CDGIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Vivarium Jeff: Following up from this morning, I have two items With regards to-current customer concerns: 1. Test and Balance Duration - based on experience gathered in the Payne School of Expediting, a suggestion might be to consider a second test and balance proposal. May save considerable time. 2. There is the potential that we may have additional technical discussion when the Air Flow Balance diagram is shared with OSHE. I spent time with Bill H. a this morning discussing some particulars, and we all realized that we are unclear about the plan, past discussions. and advantagesi'disadyantages-as they relate to certain space in the area and its adjacent pressure relationships. This could be a precursor of'things to come. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir, Operations BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404433940505 Cell: 404?285-2560 Maths, Chester From: Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 11:37 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: De Charles E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) intim?t?b?fe?t: . .. . Vivarium Const. Schedule ?2623( Paul: This appears the ?rst time that the HOG was made aware of a project schedule. Did the HOG select November 1 as a start date then or later":I Thank you From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 ?:22 AM To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. (CDC Walpole, Kenneth K. Daniels, Charles E. ivarium Const. Schedule EBZath} All: The construction schedules as presented by Willis Mechanical were presented at the HOG on Thursday. Itwas noted to the HOG Team that Willis had developed Best and Worst Case scenarios regarding shutdown durations, and that those windows were 22 days and 35 days respectively. It was also noted that the earliest that the work could begin was November 15. Based on TB program input, the start date of November ?i has no ?exibility he could vacate the space no earlier than November 15?. Laura Zambuto of - .. v. WM she will move her operation to durin rim of the Vivarium. However, mid-November represents the 262mm detef.ot..the..scheduled annual . OHS, Bill Howard, expressed the desire to have the project occur as soon as possible as the currently opera mg scenario is undesirable relative to the proposed changes. TB indicated that :12 US Laura indicated later in the day, outside of the meeting, that she would be open to the possibility of having the shutdown prematurer occur in Septemberto clear the way for the November 1 start. Her proposal is currently under consideration. . Regards. Paul Prob-st mg? 42 2E2all1: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOJOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Wednesda October 27, 2010 10:42 AM To: I (CDCJOCOOIOSHEJ Cc: Tyler. John Probst. Paul E. Shirred: De-Con Pat, To con?rm our phone conversation this morning the following cleaning agents that will be used in the are: Standard Detergent Peracetic Acid Lysol Mic ro-Chem Chlorox We are taking this in account to order ?nishes for the new door. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 K437 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ran?433.330? Cell: amass?ass? Fax: Nil-4384266? email: KMoss [aicdc gov 42 I3 3 20-2-21: . Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 5:55 PM To: Bowen, Ken Raymond, George {b.1933 .. Fw: BuildingD?Viverium Shutdown Schedule 262ath FYI Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: To: Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCXOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Tue Oct 26 10: 5 2010 ivarium Shutdown Schedule ?2623l Thanks Paul. Obviously the 2.5 months is a typo. I believe they were reading the schedule using the February 15th date as you have indicated below. However, the end of the letter does clearly indicat would still like to go with the original schedule of 8 weeks which would allow them to get in sometime the ?rst week oflanuary and not the 13 week schedule for the end ofJanuary. Thanks [El Message-m- From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Se t: Tuesdav. October 26, 2010 8:51 AM To Raymond, George Cc: Howard, William (Bill) :r/ivarium Shutdown Schedule seats} I 'l i a Although it does not satisfy the 6-8 week suggestion, let me offer the following clari?cation to the schedule. The letter from incorrectly interprets the schedule as a completion date of February 16. While that is the overall construction completion date, the last weeks are preparation of Close?out documents, and the facility will be ready for move-in on January 29. Also, I am not sure how they interpreted the overall duration as months. Using the Nov. 1 Feb. 16 window, the duration would be 3 16 months. With January 29th as the move-in date, the overall duration now stands at 13 weeks. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 was): 2 l3 (bll3i'4 From: Ib}[3l142 Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:24 AM To: Raymond, George Probst, Paul E. @Lil?i??t} Shutdown Schedule no is panama mag-- ?-_-Origina Message-m Wo'i?glcocfoloxmoao) 2623(hl .1 (EH31 2 ibllB}: ?2 Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:03 PM Vivarium schedule. May be a little too late. To:Zambuto,LauraR [himUSE-525m} Building. .. . fivarium Shutdown Schedule 62a{ Fyi. From: Adgie, Andrea L. (CTR) Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:31 PM To: Tanya A. Daniels, Charles E. Cc: Kata, Jackie m?z-Building I ivarium Shutdown Schedule Hello, Division addressing the Buildin Attached is a signed letter from the I original will be sent by interoffice mail. Thank you, Andy Andrea Acigie, MBA Management and Program Analyst Carter Consulting, Inc. Immunology and Pathogenesis Branch In?uenza Division Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30333 Tel: 404-539-0796 Fax: 404-639-2350 Vivarium shutdown Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Chandler. George (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 4:2? PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ: Tanya A. Maxwell, James O. OCOOIBFO) Subject: E: Vivarium Schedule Ken Does the PM need to explain this in more detail to them for clarity? Jim, please evaluate a Core team approach on this an advise. Thanks! From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 9:08 AM Tr Letter.de To: Chandler, George Williams, Jefferyr (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, {Eli Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Filling-,4 Vivarium Schedule We got this letter from the branch yesterday. They are complaining about the schedule however ifwe compress the we should be OK. Thought you might want to see this. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404-639-3303 Office 404-639-0499 Fax From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:22 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Rayrr {and George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: 42 Vivarium Schedule File: Schedule File: IE Letter.pdf Ken: Attached is a letter from regarding the Vivarium schedule. It is dated last week, but was forwarded to me from OSHE yesterday. The letter requests that the shutdown duration be 6-8 weeks, which returns the space back to Programs mid to late December. I have attached the schedule, which shows a "Finish Construction? date of Friday, January 28, which will then make the space available for move-in on Monday. January 31. This is thirteen weeks duration. The Test and Balance component itself is a six week duration, and have no explanation for that. 1 Also, the letter from incorrectly interprets the schedule as a completion date of February 16; however, the last 2 weeks are preparation of Close-out documents. And. I am not sure how they interpreted the overall duration as 2 14 months. Using the Novil Feb. 15 window. the duration would he 3 V2 months. Paul Probst. Asst. Din, Operations BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 WSR ?is in?: I'pr 7 a?wMau (r Date From To 42 5.6. 2523013- 262mb} LIE Ci 252mm use. 5. 262mm DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 3. HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Memorandum October 13. 2010 [ti-IE "Elu'il'dii'i?g vivariurn sh%lown schedule Tanya Charles Daniels DEMO scheduled to ted beginning on November1 for annual mainte and air?ow BFO has increased the projected time for the work and currently uled to be unavailable for use for 2.5 months. from November 1I uses two animal holding rooms snob-vou- wi hin the fa cilitv that house up to 1:14 ferrets representing - -- - - space for forrets. A loss of this magnitude for 2.5 mpact on the research and reagent production responsibilities of the laboratory space is sched 2010-to February 16, 2011. the In?uenza Division. the us e, vides laboratories around the world with-diagnostic ferret antisera for the identi Icatlon viruses in clinicat specimens including pandemic strains. We are responsible for testing the safety and efficacy of new accines and for the evaluation of the virulence and transmissibility or with pandemic potential-using the ferret model system. [13:83:42 Ll 5.0. 252.3th US Cl Vivarium facility in . {b}{3}142 LI ,8 guesses: mire-42 use .. . .2?2allti .. We appreciate that the work scheduled for the uivarium is important and extensive but a shutdown for 2.5 months is unacceptable because it will greatly impede ?311,42? ful?ll-many of the reeoneibilitie's tasked to our Division. The recent shutdown of our in 5.1: ?2E2a pace in prolonged for an additional 3?4 weeks and We have not ye ac dressed the work backlog from that shutdown. We request that you reconsider the schedule and keep the shutdown period to the originally suggested 6-8 weeks. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEPI From: (cocrocoorosuei Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 10:21 To: Probst, Paul E. we??Use-HEW Raymond, George (CDCIOCODIBFO) Howard, Wil? (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Thanks Paul. Obviously the 2.5 months is a typo. I believe they were reading the schedule using the February 16th date as you have indicated below. However, the end of the letter does clearly indicate would still like to go with the original schedule of3 weeks which would allow them to get in sometime the ?rst week ofJanuary and not the 13 week schedule for the end ofJanuary. Thanks til I Message-nu From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesda October 25, 2010 8:51 AM Raymond, George (coo/ocooloroi Howard, William (Bill) Vivarium Shutdown Schedule Although it does not satisfy the 6-8 week suggestion, let me offer the following clarification to the schedule. The letter from incorrectly interprets the schedule as a completion date of February 16. While that is the overall construction completion date, the last 23/5 weeks are preparation of Close-out documents, and the facility will be ready for move?in on January 29. Also, I am not sure how they interpreted the overall duration as 2% months. Using the Nov. 1 Feb. 15 window, the duration would be 3 34 months. With January 29th as the move?in date, the overall duration now stands at 13 weeks. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 . 2 LLSE. 2523il?l Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:24 AM GeorgEDcxocoorssol; Probst, Paul E. {CDC/ocoomm} - Vivarium Shutdown Schedule {be ?h al- "l5- Jivarium schedule. May be a little too late. l?i Message-??-- (bll3l-4?W 2525(hl - no Laura sewage {bll3l 4 . a 262a?u?e min-Builds?: Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:08 PM J-e-ct: FW: --3 oil-ding Fvi. Message-?-- From: Adgie, Andrea L. (CTR) Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:31 PM To: Tanya A. Daniels, Charles E. Cc: Kata, Jackie Vivarium Shutdown Schedule -I-.. Hello, (cocforo/nczveo]; (CDCIOCOOXOSHEJ Attached is a signed letter from th LI 5: addressing the Building Vivarium shutdown original will be sent by interof?ce mail. Thank you, Andy Andrea Adgie, MBA Management and Program Analyst Carter Consulting, Inc. mmunoloe?sr and athogenesis Branch ibj:r3}:42 use. 262a[h_: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30333 Tel: ADA-6390396 Fax: 404-539-2350 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, OctoberZB. 2010 9:03 AM To: Chandler, George Williams, Jeffery .Bov ?en L. Probst, Paul E. We got this letter from the branch yesterday. They are complaining about the schedule however if we compress the we should be OK. Thought you might want to see this- - i Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office" 404-639?3303 Of?ce 404?639-0499 Fax From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOXBFO) Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 3:22 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Ceorge (CDCIOCOOIBFO) ?2eza5ub1ect Vivarium Schedule Schedule Letter.de Ken: Attachedisa letter-from regarding the Vivarium schedule. It is dated last week, butwas forwarded to me from OSHE The letter requests that the shutdown duration be 6-8 weeks, which returns the space back to Programs mid to late December. I have attached the schedule, which shows a ?Finish Construction" date of Friday, January 28, which will . then make the space available for move-in on Monday, January 31. This is thirteen weeks duration. The Test and Balance component itself is a six week duration, and have no explanation for that. Also, the letter from incorrectly interprets the schedule as a completion date of February 16; however, the last 2 1/2 weeks are preparation of Close-out documents. And, I am not sure how they interpreted the overall duration as 2 1a months. Using the Nov.1 Feb. 16 window. the duration would be 3 14 months. F'aul Probst, Asst. Din, Operations BFOlFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Willis ??dd?lal?ll?l warmed. . 2 LIE C. 252mm to Bu! Him-??ayhal Campus October 7. 2m 0 Fri-cl: 32039455 DIM: IMJHI Gmnl?cll nu. mm 1.5? .1me m! ?damn?44?? "bl: 0* Em Wm? ~1 .523". 1.1., am? EUS- Final F'ncluct Stun: -I i i '1 iu'mc?amb?uhl' 1mm" wamsuo 3 flaw-wk! - - siim'u: m? 'FrImmuIa?Lumma??m?m am i him-m rm-Ioc 5 i . 5 3 s?aer? i an": i Tammi." i' - minPhaanlnvam ?autumn-mm . . I - -. mIlnw ""r'rii'mirno; 'W?l'c?'wmIa f: 2 5 Man mama"ma marina 5' an I "fhii'fmri walla-shad 5 . 3 Emesm 5 Thu 1mm: wad um I. "Fm-Er 1, he Uri-10 i g: i - I [ii-Hm I g; New-'swbh nmru Thain-"madam '3 +A'EH"'1'ii'15u1: i. i i w??ai'llr'im'zi?aa?'hap' ?1 "Fund" ?103th Tunum'mharsa mu 5 .3 1 i; ?saws! 1mm? Thu'lm'mizus 3: Tiraugiuim. i: Lil: I . m? =1 ans h?Ecm I ti; .5 5 i am;- 1 dayi Tue 1 ?211-0; Tue mannim 3; I 33-? aI Shul Dunn cur-annular. i 5rd"; 'luu 11mm Marl mm I: miuwnzumlum I I 23'3ng 'vredimiloI' "I'u'o 12mm] I - 1? Mbuii 1: i mo? hum Nu Dlhusall_ my. ?inn 3 1' 5' Mnmi??Thu lmmuf Tun 1 I12:15hr- i EMIMHI - flu: 3V c'hlp slim for flow (5mm day! wad "mu i i?iwi?b'l?f'ium?iwf'm ?ay? 31"? SI i 3 Finnish! 5m: nu- Carbon Fihar?mu 311;; mu mung: Thu 11mm I: i I Demo E1 st now may: mu 11mm :9 5. I EI Sail hier-a Da-ar w: meal Mun maria i - F- ?nale mum ma?a? mei?m a (rum-a an -- I mas-amomwizmi" We?'i'ii?i? i. i I. Nut Ghis. Dun: 5mmEmigrcaamru c?t' 3 - ml nI a-um-o-g-m-a- m: 5c Taii?cuwull" a -: . . El Tab Flapo? I - fangs-.1 Fil 12'2'1'61'1' hi 3; fumr?gw "11? 0H5 Smoke Test u-in'lrzul mum 5'2 5 I?m? 'ml:hmugri:P.mh L'si Mun Ira-H1 ii 'Frl 1mm 52 5 3 TH1thn-mrucnm F?'l?1 ii Fri Wili I: ."53 56 cups mLDe-cmants Mm mm Wear-16in - .z 3 :3 chiming-h" a: "mama .I - 7 0 mun-a u~ . . Ban-Int awn-Mum ErrufrFvaI-I mm I?m-mm EdtrrIlTukn mm 4} FWI1 if i El DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH HUMAN SERVICES Date From {blt3l42 US To {blt3} 42 LI so. ?2s2arm Public Health Sewice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Memorandum October 13. 2010 mini] Eluildih?i: vivariom sh tdown schedule Tanya Benson Charles Daniels DEMO -- Vivarium facility in BuildingEIs-oarrentiy .. ?3 scheduled to be decontaminated beginning on November 1 for annual maintenance and airflow reversal for the - BFO has increased the projected time for the work and currently the laboratory space Is as cooled to be unavailable for use for 2.5 months. from November 1. 2010 to February 15, 2011. 2523 uses two animal holding rooms procedure rooms . . within the facility that house Lip to 144 ferrets representing of the ivision?s space for ferrets. A loss of this magnitude for 2.5 .1 a substantial impact on the research and reagent production of m:l3}:42 use. 202.3th nterI thDides laboratories around the world with drag nostlc ferret antisera for the identification of iruses in clinicai specimens strains. We are responsible for testing the safety and efficacy of new virus vaccines and forthe evaluation of the virutence and transmissibility or Ibit3ii42 USE. 252mm iruses with pandemic potential-using the ferret model system. We appreciate that the work scheduled for the Vivarium is important and extensive but a shutdown for 2.5 months is unacceptable because it will impede-curabili to ful?ll many mp ?nsibilities tasked to our Division. The recent-shutdown of our "if . space in was prolonged for an additional 3-4 weeks and we have not yet fullyr addressed the work backlog from that shutdown. We request that you reconsider the schedule and keep the shutdowa period to the originally suggested 6-8 weeks. {ails}. 42 us asa'ailil Mathis, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFG) Sent: Tuesda October 26, 2010 8:51 AM lbll?le?w??. Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOJBFO) i2 233;; L. (CDCiocooilOSHE); Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) ?252a$ubjeetgm Bull ?n Jiuarium Shutdown Schedule Although it does not satisfy the 5-8 week suggestion, let me offer the following clari?cation to the schedule. The letter from incorrectly interprets the schedule as a completion date of February 16. While that is the overall construction completion date, the last 2% weeks are preparation of Close-out documents, and the facility will be ready for move-in on January 29. Also, am not sure how they interpreted the overall duration as 215 months. Using the Nov. 1 Feb. 16 window, the duration would be 3 if: months. With January 29th as the move-in date, the overall duration now stands at 13 weeks. The ks, Paul 404-639-0505 . . Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:24 AM 8: Raymond, George Probst, Paul E. (MEN 3- - . . - - Vivarium Shutdown Schedule Vivarium schedule. May be a little too late. i "1 - Ser t: Monday. October 25, 2010 3:08 PM {inlaid-Baa (?3?39 - ?262al5ubiectr Fw: Building Fivarium Shutdown Schedule - ?as cocrolo/NCZVEDJ: (CDCJOCODIOSHEJ Fyi. -?--Original From: Adgie, Andrea L. Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:31 PM To: Tanya A. Daniels, Charles E. 4g?zsl?atz, Jackie ivarium Shutdown Schedule Hello, {men 42 Attached is a signed letter from the ddressing the Building The-282mm original will be sent by interof?ce mail. Thank you, Andy Andrea Adgie, MBA Management and Program Analyst Carter Consulting, Inc. Immunolo and Pathogenesis Branch USU. 2E2am?. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30333 Tel: 404?639-0796 Fax: 404-639-2350 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuasday, October 26, 2010 8:22 AM To: Elowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) {misin?etsc oncl, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) ?26253rgbjem ?liaarium Schedule Schedule Letter .de ice-to.de Ken: Attached is a letter fro regarding the Vivarium schedule. It is dated last week, but was fonnrarded to me from OSHE yesterday. The'letter requests that the shutdown duration be so weeks, which returns the space back to Programs mid to late December. I have attached the schedule. which shows a ?Finish Construction" date of Friday, January 28, which will then make the space available for move-in on Monday, January 31. This is thirteen weeks duration. The Test and Balance component itself is a six week duration, and I have no explanation for that. Also, the letter from incorrectly interprets the schedule as a completion date of February 16; however, the last 2 is weeks are preparation of Close-out documents. And, I am not sure how they interpreted the overall duration as 2 months. Using the Nomi Feb. 16 window, the duration would be 3 1/2 months. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir., Operations Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 wiuis HVAC Modi?cations Pra P2009453 - {??f?ted . . .. . .. . . .. .. Reyna! Campus - lmm?? cm: - F'al Praaci Som- Tl'iu ammo; cu: - Winning-Hm a i mil ?i mu nun?II mum a '1 j? F'Hf'u, EMWEI 9.191052 1; Endemic- i 5 Sun-ml! a emu . Hays? Thu 5115M 9.1191053 . '5 rials Tamra . ?Eacuhff? m" ?was IIndarlz' ?ermmuEI mdiwin :wnlucx'w . II I mgmnimmu' rim? 'irunmrie wed mitt-'-mejm InThu :iI- woo 15 days! Mari inn ma; Fri m-zgmz- Imzmz?v Fire Dawn's?rs 'Tru'1nrrirn'?' w?'ri 'id'zrii? -I I .- I: ?Rih - I. I I I .I i mar?? 'i'b'd't ,5 i' i i 3. EFbarnn-arn 3 10am? Thutwmn: wmn'imm ESFBrEdayu 5 5 5 5 I I hlall?al?unm?tan as am} I In: 11mm: Thu IMHO ?Wad lbwmi urn-Ia 1112u1tl:2155r2d.335 I I, I. T: i 4 inwhuo? Fri ia'rsnuL-j- arm-n I . Davin" _H':in Iuian Tii'nii?i :2 II x-Rar Tue iimu?za I: 7? am annunmum unnimmi - him-r:- 9" Mechpn'p-j-Luh Wed 11min Tue1217r10? 3 I I i 11 "'Wiia'fir'a'i'i'd? I ?It muniimura' :3 . E: Fri 11:15:10 m?a'd 5 I. as; "'"T'Fi'ii i'i'ii'm'u' 'Tr'iiI' 1'r'1t'li11' I I L1s1alh'ew Damp-urn e. um I Thu ?l1i'1?i'1? Tun iirzyiu? I9 i 5 - we: ?mum ma ii'r'ii'idiif" - - F'iv'u Sir-55m_' 4am}: chlr11'i'11 f. Mountain-mu, "A?hiin?rum 3.5. 1? ?rm in?: iirii?ui' i i - d' Chip-illnh rn_rmm hummus - Hair. Wed lir?ar'iu "Din ilfmni'?u - Tl . Sidn'ri new mini at am - . Pin-wan. Shha?arcmn Fiiur Cum! 2 tday Thi. Thu 11i1'1iiui 42' 5 i Damn E?ning Dunr 2 day: 'I'La'mano was is? Semi Emmi-u 0w wINw W91 5 I :i am Thu 11mm Mm Hi??l'lni 3: ?i at "ii'ci'ri'l'i'i?i?i' #munw?u ?w I Nii?iri-ilnr Niki nLi-li'i'h'w" ?fa?ii}; "'W?d'ii?h?i 2 i . i i hie-- GI-ast. Don Samar. il'ld Scan 3 In dul Thu War"?ii'di'?'eiJiEdT?En'iFn" ""lleEi' I - mu} Inuit-maul? cut 1 Hnuwhr'ic' Ag'HF??H??hTh??'di? 5 in mum-'1. a I: - 1 4r: 11"? "r?mfmm?r-Irzm - .- .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. I: I ?anaemia-rag? m, mammi? ?7qu Wall Thruunh'PuI't? Uil Mun1i'24r'll Fd1r2w11=52 .5 f- 5 fit marmamrc'n' "r'ri'i'rarn' r'ri'l'r?i'viig'?" a 5: 5 "mm-Mk- . '71- Cut I i? Eh? ?gm? l' '5 -. i arm-?W. 5mm BmhaMm'uM arm-1PM?: mun manarnw WW lam-runaw- 9 m" oran mam was? . Emu-r Ema-nule anal-Ii {5 My: 1 {0155.142 USE To Pubiic Heaitn Service Centers for Disease Controi and Prevention (CDC) Memorandum ibnoi DEMO vivarium sh tdown schedule ibiiBHZ vivaiiurn facility in Building D?iscurrently - . Ham} schedule-tilts ice-decontaminated beginning on Novembert for annuai maintenance and air?ow reversal for [helb231142 u. BFO has in creased the projected time for the work and currentiy the iaboratory space is scheduled to'be unavailable for use for 2.5 months, from November 2010 to? February 16,2011. I uses two animai hoiding rooms . 'Iity that house up to 144 ferrets representing 5% cf the ivision's overeii space for ferrets- A toe: of this magnitude for 2.5 months will have a substantial impact on the research and reagent production of the Division. I inii3;::42 use. ?2EZain. world with diagnostic ferret antisera for the identi?cation of s. In Eif?si?ssl Center. the In?uenza Di vices laboratories around the sei?sza iruses in clinical'speCimeris We are responsible for testing the safety and ef?cacy of new. ccines and for the evaluation of the virulence and t'ransmissibilitv or with pandemic potential using the ferret model system. we appreciate that the work scheduled for ihe Vivarium is important and extensivebute ful?ll many - - space in 5-3-5 was prolonged for ah additional 3-4 weeks and we have not yet fully addressed the work backlog from that-shutdown. We request that you reconsider the schedule and keep the shutdown period lo the originally suggested 6-8 weeks. a 26323th Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:24 AM 55:91:33 Raymond, ,e Probet, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) ?25233u.bject=, Vivarium Shutdown Schedule Attachments: Documentp {moms u, schedule. May be a little too late. egg-,3, . - .. one) Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:08 PM Laura '1 ?2528?ubject FW:?Buildin?Vivarium Shutdown .. . Message?~- From: Adgie, Andrea L. Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:31 PM To: Tanya A. Daniels, Charles E. {mm gaftz, Jackie ii.? ?25283tibjettf Iivarium Shutdown Schedule Hello, {01(3142 Attached is a signed letter from th addressing the Buildin i'ira rtum'ahu't'dawn"'st'hed tile. original will be sent by interof?ce mail. Thank you, Andy Andrea Adgie, MBA Management and Program Analyst Carter Consulting, Inc. hogenesis Branch use ?252arh} Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30333 Tel: 404?639?0796 Fax: 4011-6394350 arm-mt? '3 wt'. hie?: Date From 42 US C. ?262aim Subjec To {bits} 42 c. @2523th lobar-.42 262.3% ibii3i'42 use escarh; have: 42 uses 2623m- 6 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 8: HUMAN SERVICES :1 (.- Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) October 13. 2010 Memorandum in mi "auras; Tanya Charles Daniels DEMO vivariurn sh [down schedule . Frn?i uses two animalholding rooms i" facility that house up to 144 ferrets representing 57% {bii3i'42 Li [2 2628th vivan?um facility in Building currently scheduled to . for the -- the laboratory sp 2010 to February 15,2011. procedure roomswill have a substantial impact on the research and reagent production responsibilities of ivision. mo the demniarmnaled beginning-on Iii?ovember 1 for annual maintenance and airflow BFO has in creased the projected time for the work and currently ace is sche uled to be unavailable for use for 2.5 months, from November 1, space for ferrets. A loss of this magnitude for 2.5 world with diagnostic ferret antisera for the identi?cation of 42 US [1.5 2523[hf LIE. C. 2523 Center. the ivision i rovides laboratories around the me viruses in clinical specimens including pandemic strains. We are responsible for testing the safety and ef?cacy of new itljf? US I: ccines and for the evaluation of the virolence and or ith pandemic potential using the ferret model system. We appreciate thatthe work scheduled for the Vivarium is important and extensive but a shutdown for 2.5 months is unacceptable because it will greatly impede to ful?ll many nsibilities tasked to our Division. The recent shutdown of on space in. I U5 5 ?2 . was prolonged for an additional 3-4 weeks and we have not yet fully addressed the work backlog from that shutdown. We request that you reconsider the schedule and keep the shutdown period to the originally suggested 6-3 weeks. US (I: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 5:34 PM Bowen. Ken Raymond, George (CDOIOCOOIBFO) Attachments: Documentp lb}(3} 42 use. ?z?za?ishba?E'l?'fro'th an Vivarium shutdown schedule. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 Message-?-- From: {cocrocoo/osnel Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:49 PM 4'5quleward, William Probst, Paul E. (CDCXOCOOXBFO) ?2eza?ubjectt Fw: Building Iivariurn Shutdown Schedule so 2523'?? Front-:- To: Zambuto, Laura Fl. {bnw?sgen?tcll?on Oct 25 15 2010 ?2623 Build-in ivarium Shutdown Schedule (coo/elo/chvso); [cocrocooxosncl Fyi. --. From Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:31 PM To' - A. Daniels, Charles E. (coo/ocoo/Brol {W3};th ?m5: Maggy; Vivarium Shutdown Schedule Hello, lb?llAttached is a signed letter from the "r 5? 2520"? addressing the shutdown schedule. The original will be sent by interof?ce mail. Thank you, Andy Andrea Adgie, MBA Management and Program Analyst Carter Consulting, Inc. Immunology and Pathogenesis Branch I Ingrsizsis use. 53 252mm I Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30333 Tel: 404-639-0796 Fax: 404?639?2350 Ms 3" meek Jr 1 c; Mutt? Date From so. ?2628tlii3nbject .. To 42 LI 5 i3. ?2623ih-} [has 42 uses 252mm IJ (I: 262th?2 Ith3L-l?2 USU 5 262mm .. Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 3: HUMAN SERVECES Memorandum October 18, 2010 On behalf of the Division National Center for immunization and Respiratory.r Diseases Nancy J. Cox, a Division Director 476 ,7 .. . . Shaw, Associate Director Labora ry Sciences Alexander KlimovI Branch Chief (5343mm Virus Surveillance and Diagnosis Bran i Ruben Donis. Branch Chief Motecular Viroiogy and Vaccines Branch Jacqueline Katz, CL I Branch Chief 7 /f immunology and Pather sis Branch Buildirig .. . iivarium sh tdown schedule Tanya Charles Daniels DEMO {bits} 42 so -- rivadum in ?2523ihl ember 1 for annual maintenance and airflow reversal-for the BFO has increased the projected time for the work and currently the Laboratory space is scheduled to be unavailable for use for. 2.5 months, from November 1. 2010 to February 15,- 2011. - mien: us cg uses two animai holding rooms and two" seem . -- w. thin the facility that house up to 144 ferrets is presenting 57% space for ferrets. A loss of this magnitude for 2.5 months will have a substantial impact on the research and reagent production responsibilities .of the Division; i m: 5 Der lCenter, the Division 1- rovides laboratories around the world With diagnostic ferret antisera for the identi?cation of viruses in ciinical specimens including pandemic strains. We are responsible for testing the safety and ef?can of new :12 252a[l1:- meta as virus vaccines and for the evaluation of the virulence and transmissibility or imam: tam viruses with pandemic potential using'the ferret model system, did We appreciate that the work scheduled for the viverium is important and extensive but a shutdoWn for 2.5 months is unacceptable because'it-will greatly impede our ehilitE to ful?ll many IWMEUSC - -- - -- nsibilities tasked ts dur Division. The our ?5'3 5 2:32am! was prelonged feran additional 3-4 weeks and we have not ye a dressed the work backing from that shutdown. We request that you reconsider-the schedule and keep the shutdown period to the originally suggested 6-8 weeks. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:49 PM Howard, Wi (Bill) Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Attachments: Documents Ul Original Message . flit; Eli'Zambuta, Laura R. {cochomcmot Oct 25 15 n" '5 2010 ?2528iject FWE Building Vivarium Shutdown Schedule use. .. . -- ?252a?hig w. --?-Original Message-m- From: Adgie, Andrea L. Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:31 PM To: Tanya A. Daniels, Charles E. (CDCJUCOOIBFOJ Jackie Vivarium Shutdown Schedule Hello, (meme addressing the Building warium shutdown schedule. The Attached is a signed letter from the original will he sent by interof?ce mail. Thankyou, Andy Andrea Adgie, MBA Management and Program Analyst Carter Consulting, Inc. Immunolo and Pathogenesis Branch ib_lr_l.2 5 253[} Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30333 Tel: 404-639-0796 Fax: 404-639-2350 maize-12 202all1. Marthe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: To: Subject Thank; Paul 404?539~0505 Message?-?- Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFOJ Thursda Ootober21, 2010 8:22 AM Howard, William (Bill) FW: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 1:53 PM To: Moss, Karen Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Karen: DSHE inquired this morning if BFO had an air balance diagram on the Vivarium project for their review. I told them I would check with you. Please advise. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 Messag From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, June 2010 11:09 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Bi?. renewmv access. tam Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ?70-438?8307 Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: ??0-438-2567 email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 10:35 AM To: Moss, Karen Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M: Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Karen: Can you forward the revised air balance diagram for review prior to tomorrow's meeting? Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 3:07 PM To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 lf ACH rate had stayed the same the exhaust CFM would have been much greater, lower ACH rate means lower air quantity however the pressure differential went up so the differential CFM is greater. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: email: KMossl@cdc.gov --?-Origina From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (cocrocoo/eFo) Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Thanks Karen, As mentioned below, we need to meet again to put the VFD issue to rest. I would like to make this a working session to make sure we are all on board with the design approach and an explanation to the increase in CFMs when the air change rate has decreased. Everyone, please check your schedule for Tuesday in the Building 20 2nd ?oor conference room at 3:00am. ??-0riginal From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:15 PM To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The estimated exhaust air?ow is 17,855 CFM (17,163 current} at an estimated external static pressure drop of 2.8 current] inches W.C. The calculation included reducing the air change rate from 15 to 12. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS K-97 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770483-8307 Cell: 404-825?6327 Fax: 770-438-266? email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 3:36 PM To: Raymond, George Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. [coc/ocooxlssol; Walpole, Kenneth K. (cocfocoo/aFo); Probst, Paul E. (cocfocooXBFo) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Any update on a date you will know the total CFM required by the exhaust fans? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1500 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.539.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:00 PM - To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Re: and Schedule Meeting review for P20094153 You are welcome. Keep in mind that this is a "Ball Park" only. Also, FM E0 does not support the use for this application, for reason we discussed during our meeting on yesterday. However, per our agreement during yesterdays, meeting we are willing to revisit this issue once ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. In orderto put the VFD issue to rest, will you know the total exhaust and supply CFM design (CFM only) within the next couple of weeks? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention EC) Of?ce: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404597-2599 Fax: 404-639-1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 Original Message From: Moss, Karen To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCODIBFOI Sent: Thu May 20 16:49:55 2010 Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The intent is to give a preliminary IGE to P50 to give them an order of magnitude of the cost of the project. I would prefer to err a little on the high side rather than the low. Thanks for your input George, I will use your number of $20,000 for any controls cost {which I assume include cost, installation and programming) associated with 2 VFD's. Final IGE will be presented upon final design documents. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. M5 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-483-8307 Cell: 404?825?5827 Fax: 7?0-488-2657 email: KMossl?cdc.gov Message?? From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:50 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2000453 I think things are getting lost in Email Translation. The email that Karen sent to Ken had nothing to do with my email below. My email below is only a follow-up to the agreements and action items following our meeting on yesterday. In reference to the email that Karen forwarded on to Ken from Lenore Mickie, PGO only requested a "ballpark figure" and a "price range" for the overall for this project. If you are adding in the price for the VFD's for "worst case", you can use the following: VFD's $10,000 (2 at 5K each} Electrical $20,000 Controls $20,000 Total for VFD Add is between Ball park. However, as stated below, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope of this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. For that matter, you cannot attempted to come-up with and IGE until you have an agreed upon scope and preliminary design. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Of?ce: 404.639-3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e-maii Message-m- From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. (CDCKOCOOIBFOL: Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 George, Some things are lost andXor misunderstood in the e-mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot ofwork on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGO with a 5 detailed up-front. Lenore Mickie requested the IGE in an e?mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something l'm sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting - that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, and we will revisit the issue when design parameters are available. Karen is simply trying to present a worst?case estimate to PGO in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail (as is often my problem}. Anyway, believe she needs someone's OK in FMEO to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the e-mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease ControI and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop K-96 Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 770?488?8105 Cell: 404-444-6281 e-mail: TBIanchard@cdc.gov -?--0riginal From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow?up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on May 19, it was agreed that in order to make a dacision on the need for VFD, a design would have to be completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the final design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a final design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FMEO's position is are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention DDXOCODIBFOIFMEO Office: 404-539-3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 404-639-1635 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-O4 42 262th Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probet, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 1:53 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Karen: DSHE inquired this morning if BFU had an air balance diagram on the Vivarium project for their review. i told them I would check with you. Please advise. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 Message?-? From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 11:09 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 404-825-6327 Fax: 770?483-255? email: KMossl@cdc.gov --?-?0rigina Message-~- From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 10:35 AM To: Moss, Karen Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. (CDCIDCDDIBFOI: Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (anemone/Bro) Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453- Karen: Can you forward the revised air balance diagram for review prior to tomorrow's meeting? Thanks, Pa 01 404-639-0505 ?-?-Original Message?? From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 3:07 PM To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFD) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 If ACH rate had stayed the same the exhaust CFM would have been much greater, lower ACH rate means lower air quantity however the pressure differential went up so the differential CFM is greater. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contradting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ?70e488e8307 Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: 30433-2667 email: KMossi@cdc.gov Message-"- From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:57 PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCXOCOOIBFOJ Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Thanks Karen, As mentioned below, we need to meet again to put the VFD issue to rest. I would like to make this a working session to make sure we are all on board with the design approach and an explanation to the increase in CFMs when the air change rate has decreased. Everyone, please check your schedule for Tuesday 6f8f2010 in the Building 20 2nd floor conference room at 8:00am. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:15 PM To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. (coczocoomFol; Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The estimated exhaust airflow is 12,855 CFM (12,163 current) at an estimated external static pressure drop of 2.8 current} inches W.C. The calculation included reducing the air change rate from 15 to 12. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 220-488-8307 Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: 220-488-2667 email: KMoss1@cdc.gov From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 3:35 PM To: Raymond, George Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Any update on a date you will know the total CFM required by the exhaust fans? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e?mail From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:00 PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Re: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 You are welcome. Keep in mind that this is a "Ball Park" only. Also, FMED does not support the use of VFD for this application, for reason we discussed during our meeting on yesterday. However, per our agreement during yesterdays, meeting we are willing to revisit this issue once ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. In order to put the VFD issue to rest, will you know the total exhaust and suppiy CFM design only) within the next couple of weeks? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office: 404?639?3335 Cell: 404-597-2599 Fax: 40?539?1685 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 Original Message From: Moss, Karen To: Raymond, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Prohst, Paul E. (cocrocoomro) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Thu May 20 16:49:55 2010 Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 The intent is to give a preliminary IGE to P60 to give them an order of magnitude of the cost of the project. I would prefer to err a little on the high side rather than the low. Thanks for your input George, I will use your number of $20,000 for any controls cost (which I assume include cost, installation and programming} associated with 2 VFD's. Final IGE will be presented upon final design documents. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. M5 K-97- Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-825-6327 Fax: ??0?483-2667 email: KMossl@cdc.gov Message--?? From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:50 PM To: Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 4 I think things are getting lost in Email Translation. The email that Karen sent to Ken had nothing to do with my email below. My email below is only a follow-up to the agreements and action items following our meeting on yesterday. In reference to the email that Karen forwarded on to Ken from Lenore Mickle, PGO only requested a "ballpark figure? and a "price range" for the overall IGE for this project- If you are adding in the price for the VFD's for "worst case?, you can use the following: VFD's $10,000 (2 at 5K each) Electrical $20,000 Controls $20,000 Total for VFD Add is between Ball park. However, as stated below, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope of this project can be determined until a ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. For that matter, you cannot attempted to come~up with and IGE until you have an agreed upon scope and preliminary design. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 Please consider the environment before printing this e?mail From: Blanchard, Thomas M. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:02 PM To: Raymond, George Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Walpole, Kenneth K. {cocjocoo/aso}; Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 Geo rg e, Some things are lost andlor misunderstood in the e?mail translation. I think the issue at hand is that Karen has been accomplishing a lot of work on this project by having to work backwards. This is so that she can provide PGID with a detailed IGE up-front. Lenore Mickle requested the IGE in an e-mail that Karen copied to Ken Walpole. This will allow PGO to work on fast-tracking the project as much as possible, something I'm sure that we all want. She wasn't trying to raise an alarm or misinterpret the ending status of our meeting yesterday. I believe - from discussions I've had independently with several after the meeting that your description of the meeting below is accurate and true. We need to keep an open mind on both sides of the issue, re: keep the damper-plenum vs. VFD's, and we will re-visit the issue when design parameters are available. is simply trying to present a worst-case estimate to P60 in the meantime so that they can continue on their fast- track effort. Perhaps she might have explained it in more detail, but not everyone writes a book when sending an e-mail (as is often my problem). Anyway, I believe she needs someone's OK in FMED to solicit that estimate from JCI and sent the e-mail at my suggestion. Thomas M. Blanchard, P.E. Buildings and Facilities Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Mail Stop Ka96 Atlanta, GA 30333 Phone: 7?0-488-8105 Cell: 404?444?5281 e-mail: TBIanchard@cdc.gov --?-Originai Message--?-- From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:29 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Subject: VFD and Schedule Meeting review for P2009453 This is a follow-up to our meeting on the VFD and Schedule for project P2009453. Per our meeting on Mai,r 19, it was agreed that in order to make a decision on the need for VFD, a design would have to he completed to determine the total amount of exhaust CFMs needed for the Vivarium area. Based on the test performed in the Vivarium area to determine the current conditions, the problems uncovered may be improved upon or worsened depending on the ?nal design for exhaust CFM. However the outcome, no decision on adding or not adding the VFDs to the scope to this project can be determined until a ?nal design for the total required CFM has been determined. At this time, FM EO's position is are optional until CFM requirements have been determined. George K. Raymond Deputy,' Director Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Of?ce: 404-639-3335 Cell: 404-59?-2599 Fax: 1000-6355-1535 Email: ghr6@cdc.gov Mail stop: F-04 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Wednesday. October 20, 2010 9:32 AM Probst, Paul E. (CD .To: a a a . iatilifsi?tlest: P2009453cocschedule According to the current schedule, that is correct. Art -?-Original Message?-- From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 8:43 AM . ,Toa Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCfoccjo BFO if Schedme Art: My interpretation is that the facility will be ready for move-in by programs/users January 29th. Is that correct? Thanks, Paul 404-539-0505 -m-Original Messagemm From: Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:00 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Seat? st?! Alissa 41: Please see the attached schedule for the current schedule for the airflow project. Art --?-Original Message?? From: Avery w. Wood IV Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:32 PM To: Mickle, Lenore Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Iwillis@willismech.com; 'Grant Willis'; Moss, Karen ass-season: REE 9.2009453 COCSchedule Lenore, See the attached revised schedule based on the revised work durations. As you can-see, these durations are longer than we anticipated. Because the is not in scope, has not planned to have a representative on site during this time. While the change does not add any cost to WMI, both the lab shut down and contract completion dates are show pushed out by the difference in work durations. We now show contract completion on 2/16/11. Also, please note the our schedule assumes we will be releasing the equipment today Without approved submittals for our long lead equipment, the schedule will begin to be impacted- .1 Thanks, Avery w. Wood IV I 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 678 956 0094 Work 9420 Fax & Cell From: Lingler, Arthur H. [mailtorarl3@cdc.gov] Sent: Thursday, 0ctober07, 2010 12:05 PM To: Avery W. Wood IV gages-Ilia? ga?j??i P.2009453 CDC Schedule Avery, Please update your schedule to reflect these dates for the Test and Balance portion of the contract. Art From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2010 4:21 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. fetid? S'A?feict: FW: Art, I talked with the TAB Contractor today(he has been out of the country and unavailable}. He needs 30 working days to complete the field TAB work. Willis has TAB starting on Friday, December 3rd, 30 working days out from that has him ?nishing approximately on January . .. I The report process will start on the January 12th and be" delivered on the 24th of January. He agreed to do commissioning while the formal report process is ongoing. Which means TAB commissioning would start on the 1?th and the TAB report would be updated as work is done in the ?eld; this is not a normal process. Normally the formal report process would not start until commissioning is complete. The earliest TAB would have reports delivered to the CDC for review would be on January 24th and would take a couple of clays to review. We discussed the MLK holiday in January, I am not sure contractors can work on a government holiday or not but he said they could take the Monday off and work the Saturday before if need he. Please have Willis Mechanical update his schedule to reflect this information. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1500 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 2 2E'23Il'l,? IlJll'il Office: 77?0-488-8307 Cell: 404-325-582? Fax: email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Avery w. Wood IV Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:23 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: ?Grant Willis?; Moss, Karen Mickie, Lenore gIi?jj?st: P2909453 coo Schedule Art, See attached updated and revised schedule based on CDC comments at the meeting yesterday. This schedule is based on most current lead times and durations of work. Please let me know if anything needs to be changed. Thanks, Avery W. Wood IV 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 678 966 0094 Work 673 966 9420 Fax Cell -?--Original From: Mickie, Lenore Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:07 PM To: Grant Willis; Tyler, John Moss, Karen Iwillis@willismech.com; Daniels, Charles E. (CDC/ocooxBFo); Riley, Steve (CDC/ocoorerol; Lingler, Arthur R. (cocrocooxaroh Avery w. Wood Iv Subject: P2009453 Sign-in 10f04f10 RE: Today's Pre?construction Meeting, Roster Attached is a copyr of the sign-in sheet, per your request. Thank you, Lenore Mickie CDC, Procurement and Grants Office Buildings and Facilities Contracts Branch Phone: TITO-4884623 Fax: 770-433-234? This e-mail and any ?les transmitted with it contain 0.5. Government information thatis OFFICIAL USE or other types of SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED information requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure. All information is con?dential, intended solely for the addressee and shall be disseminated only on a TO basis. To provide feedback on your recent experiences with PGO, email Feedback will be used to improve business services. From: Koger Colgate 2816 (near) Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:00 PM To: Mickle, Lenore Subject: P2009453 Sign-in 10(04/10 Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device. 42 {ba3142 252mb} 42 252301 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Prohst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 0:48 AM To: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Schedule Art: My interpretation is that'the facility will be ready for move-in by programsfusers January 29th. Is that correct? Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 Message-?- From: Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:00 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. gallies: Please see the attached schedule for the current schedule for the bldg. airflow: project. Art From: Avery W. Wood IV [mailtozawood@willismech.com] Sent: Thursday, October 2010 2:32 PM To: Mickie, Lenore CC: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCXOCOO 'GrantWillis'; Moss, (CDCIOCDDIBFOJ gli?isct: Schedule Lenore, See the attached revised schedule based on the revised work durations. As you can see, these durations-are longer than we anticipated. Because the is not in WMI scope, has not planned to have a representative on site during this time. While the change does not add any cost to WMI, both the lab shut down and contract completion dates are show pushed out by the difference in work'clurations. We now show contract completion on Ellis/11. Also, please note the our schedule assumes we will be releasing the equipment today (103-10). Without approved submittals for our long lead equipment, the schedule will begin to be impacted. Thanks, Avery W. Wood 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 578 956 0094 Work 673 966 9420 Fax Cell 252mm i i I :12 ??--Original Message?"? From: Lingler, Arthur R. [mailtozarl3@cdc.gov] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 12:05 PM To: Avery W. Wood IV sateen Fw: 920119453..ch Schedule Avery, Please update your schedule to reflect these dates for the Test and Balance portion of the contract. Art --?-Original From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:21 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. - Cc: Daniels, Charles E. 313.1% ct; Art, I talked with the TAB Contractor todaylhe has been out ofthe country and unavailable}. He needs 30 working days to complete the field TAB work. Willis has TAB starting on Friday, December 3rd, 30 working days out from that has him on .J..a.nuary. 14th.. I The repm process will start on the January 12th an: be delivered on the 24th oflanuary. He agreed to do commissronlng while the formal report process is ongoing. Which means TAB commissioning would start on the 17th and the TAB report would be updated as work is done in the field; this is not a normal process. Normally the formal report process would not start until commissioning is complete. The earliest TAB would have reports delivered to the CDC for review would be on January 24th and would take a couple of days to review. We discussed the MLK holiday in January, I am not sure contractors can work on a government holiday or not but he said they could take the Monday offand work the Saturday before if need be. Please have Willis Mechanical update his schedule to reflect this information. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: 770-488-2557 email: KMossl@cdc.gov ?-??Original From: Avery W. Wood IV Sent: Tuesday. October DB, 2010 1:23 PM . 41,43,412 202.301: Ibil?; To: Lingler, Arthur it. Cc: 'Grant Willis',? Moss, Karen Iwillis@willismech.com; Mickie, Lenore .. Schedule Art, See attached updated and revised schedule based on CDC comments at the meeting yesterday. This schedule is based on most current lead times and durations of work. Please let me know if anything needs to be changed. Thanks, Avery W. Wood IV 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 678 966 0094 Work 678 966 9420 Fax Cell ??--Original From: Mickle, Lenore Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:07 PM To: Grant Willis; Tyler, John Moss, Karen Iwillis@willismech.com; Daniels, Charles E. Riley, Steve Lingler, Arthur R. Avery W. W000 1V Subject: P2009453 Sign?in 10/04/10 RE: Today's Pre~construction Meeting, Roster Attached is a copy of the sign?in sheet, per your request. Thank you, Lenore Mickie CDC, Procurement and Grants Of?ce Buildings and Facilities Contracts Branch Phone: 270-433-2623 Fax: 733?488-284? This e-mail and any files transmitted with it contain U.S. Government information that is OFFICIAL USE or other types of SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED information requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure. All information is confidential, intended solely for the addressee and shall be disseminated only on a TO basis. To provide feedback on your recent experiences with PGO, email Feedback will be used to improve business services. Message-m- From: Koger Colgate 2816 (near) Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:00 PM To: Mickie, Lenore Subject: P2009453 Sign-in Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device. 2623Ih: Mathe, From: Sent To: seem Chester (cocrocoorosep) Nogueira, William P. Tuesday, October 19, 2010 9:41 AM Protest, Paul E. Phillips, Roman Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ (CTR) X?Rar From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 9:39 AM To: Nogueira, William P. Simpson, Paul D. Linler, Arthur R. . - almg Allison Zambuto, Laura R. hora} rate; Sai'?ii?fs??ja?tl .. X-Rav Gentlemen, is scheduled to Xn?ay thel:lslab on 11/02/2011 from 8:01] AM. to 3:00 PM. The X?Rays will 5th in the 225;}? i .. 252mm USE . Please make sure the area is clear of personnel. Thank you, Karen Moss P.E. Mechan ioal Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of? no: wows-am? Cell: 4614-3254382? Fax: WG-4 33-266? email: K'Mossi @cdc. gov Mathe, Chester (CDCIDCODIOSEP) From: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 10:09 AM To: Probat. Paul E. (cocrocooreFO) Ce: Bowen. Ken L. Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) .. . . BE: coc. Schedule Attachments: 01010 Summary of Work_SDC_?Reuised September 8. 2010.pdf Here is the latest Summary of Work. I have not seen an air balance diagram for this project. I assume one is in the works. Art From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 8:12 AM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George 3021i? Eldest: cor: Schedule Art: Thanks for sending schedule update. Do you have a'current scope? The last scope document we were provided was dated July 15, and I believe it mayr have been modified during negotiations. I have sent via separatee?mail. Also, is there an air balance diagram that the TAB contractor will be working from? Appreciate the help. Paul ?-?0rigina Message?? From: Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Tuesday, 0ctober'12, 2010 1:00 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Email 711:2 CDC. Schedule Please see the attached schedule for the current schedule for the lb;tat42 0 sea 2:32am, Art Message"- From: Avery W. Wood IV Sent: Thursday, October 2010 2:32 PM To: Mickle, Lenore WW laingler, Arthur R. (CDCillis@willismech.com; 'Grant Willis'; Moss, Karen 2525mm Subject: Schedule Lenore, See the attached revised schedule based on the revised work durations. As you can see, these durations are longer than we anticipated. Because the is not in WMI scope, WMI has not planned to have a representative on site during this time. While the change does not add any cost to WMI, both the lab shut down and contract completion dates are show pushed out by the difference in work durations. We now show contract completion on 2/16/11. Also, please note the our schedule assumes we will be releasing the equipment today (10-7-10). Without approved submittais for our long lead equipment, the schedule will begin to be impacted. Thanks, Avery W. Wood Iv 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle GA 30092 628 966 0094 Work 623 966 942C Fax Cell 262alh': From: Lingler, Arthur B. Sent: Thursday, October 2010 12:05 PM To: Avery W. Wood IV Subject: Fw: P2009453 Avery, [bulk-42 r153 Please update your schedule to reflect these dates for the Test and Balance portion of the contract. Art From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFCJ) Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:21 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. - Cc: Daniels, Charles E. B??ieqta Schedule Art, i talked with the TAB Contractor today(he has been out of the country and unavailable}. He needs 30 Working days to complete the ?eld TAB work. Willis has TAB starting on Friday, December 3rd, 30 working days out from that has him I The report process will start on the January 1?th and be delivered on the 24th ofJanuary. He agreed to do commissioning while the formal report process is ongoing. Which means TAB commissioning would start on the 17th and the TAB report would be updated as work is done in the ?eld; this is not a normal process. Normally the formal report process would not start until commissioning is complete. The earliest TAB would have reports delivered to the CDC for review would be on January 24th and would take a couple of days to review. We discussed the MLK holiday in January, I am not sure contractors can work on a government holiday or not but he said they could take the Monday off and work the Saturday before if need be. Please have Willis Mechanical update his schedule to reflect this information. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Keg? Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: CelI: 404-825-682? Fax: 770?488?266? email: KMossl@cdc.gov Regards, ?-~--Original From: Avery w. Wood IV Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:23 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: 'Grant Willis'; Moss, Karen Mickie, Lenore 5220122? sii?rifect: ezooaasapoc Schedule Art, See attached updated and revised schedule based on CDC comments at the meeting yesterday. This schedule is based on most current lead times and durations of work. Please let me know if anything needs to be changed. Thanks, Avery W. Wood IV 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 678 956 0094 Work 678 966 9420 Fax Cell Ib}i6': Message?-? From: Mickle, Lenore Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:0? PM To: Grant Willis; Tyler, John Moss, Karen Charles E. Riley, Steve Lingler, Arthur Fl. Avery W. Wood IV Subject: P2009453 Sign-in 10/04f10 RE: Today's Fre-construction Meeting, Roster Attached is a copy of the sign-in sheet, per your request. Thank you, Lenore Mickle CDC, Procurement and Grants Of?ce Buildings and Facilities Contracts Branch Phone: 770-488-2623 Fax: 770?433-2347 This e-rnail and any files transmitted with it contain US. Government information that is OFFICIAL USE or other types of SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED information requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure. All information is confidential, intended solely for the addressee and shall be disseminated only on a TO basis. To provide feedback on your recent experiences with P60, email Feedback will be used to improve business services. hue-Original From: Koger Colgate 2816 (near) Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:00 PM To: Mickle, Lenore Subject; P2009453 Sign?in 10f04I10 Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION .. . .- CDC P2009453- Section oto1o1 333333.17? i Fort .. Summary of Work 01010 SUMMARY OF WORK FOR SOLUTION ORDER CONCEPT (SOC) PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. This section includes the following: Scope of Work. Work by the Government. Government Furnished Products. Contractor use of site and premises. Work Sequence. Government occupancy. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Related sections include the following: Section 01300 - Submittals Section at 311 - Nenvorir Analysis Schedules Section 01545 - Health and Safety Section 01547 - Personnel Security Requirements Section Of 7'00 - Project Closeout 1.3 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD A. Project Delivery Method: The method of delivery for this project is a Solution Order Concept (SOC). The SOC is characterized by the iollowing elements: 1. The SOC is a process that does not utilize conventional design services, therebyempowering the Contractor to become very involved in the project's earliest stages. The Contractor, as a team member with CDC, will be expected to provide suggestions, ask questions, and offer potential alternative methods, systems, or products to the Scope of Work (BOW) provided by CDC. The SOC process is based on CDC and the Contractor meeting at the site, reaching consensus on the scope, schedule, and cost of the project, confirming all agreements in writing, awarding the contract, and executing the work. 2. Site Visit. The purpose of the site visit is to convey technical objectives tor the project (BOW) to the Contractor and to be a working meeting that moves the team closer to the final de?nition of the project's scope. While all systems, materials. and issues may not be selected or settled during this site visit, all known issues should be revealed and discussed. a. Required Attendees: Contractor's Project Manager and Superintendent; each major trade sub contractor?s Project Manager; CDC Contracting Officer; CIMO landior DEMO) Project Managerts), design discipline experts, COTR, and Building Manager; program representativels); and appropriate support personnel from OHS, OSEP, and similar programs. b. A lollow up site meeting may be appropriate if additional information or clari?cation is required. 3. FCC Request for Proposal. Alter the BOW has been re?ned, POO will send the Solicitation, Offer, and Award document and attachments to the Contractor for pricing. 4. Contractors Proposal. The Contractor's proposal includes aschedule, scope, cost. and submittal materials as appropriate and required in the SOW to provide a solution to the requirements de?ned by the SOW and other components of the Solicitation. The following are technical SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI Revised September 3. 201G tom. 42 U5 3 coo P2009453 I I . - SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION [53le Section 010102 Summary of Work requirements for the initial proposal to be submitted to the Contracting Officer (also refer to Section 01300]: a. Demonstrate compliance with the Bow. b. Cost for the work and services broken down by building and detailed down to the trade by work activity, number of labor hours, and hourly costs. c. Equipment and material cut sheets, shop drawings. and product data, including MSDS sheets as appropriate. d. Provide alternatives fro consideration by CDC as appropriate. e. Construction schedule of activities. This would include necessary utility outages with duration estimates. B. Technical Evaluation. The technical evaluation by CDC will include, but may not be limited to, the following: Veri?cation of compliance with the sow. Acceptance or rejection of Equipment and Materials submittals. Acceptance or rejection of required submittals, shop drawings, samples,_and all other information required by the SOW. Evaluation of Construction Activity Schedule. Cost proposal. C. Award. The criteria for award are contained in the Soiicitation, Offer, and Award document and attachments as issues by the Contracting Officer for this project. 1 . Upon receipt of the contract, the Contractor shall execute any other non-site specific requirements of the contract, such as ordering items with long lead times, shop fabrication of assemblies, initiation of shop drawings and other submittals processes, update or partial short circuit and coordination study (if required}, and all other activities to insure the project shall be completed according to the project scope, cost, and schedule. D. Notice to Proceed. The information in this paragraph in no way supersedes, negates, or definesthe requirements contained in the Solicitation, Offer, and Award document issued by the Contracting Officer forthis project. 1 . Upon receipt of all requirements in the Soiicitation, Offer, and Award document relating to award of Notice to Proceed (NTP), the Contracting Cflicer will, at the preconstruction meeting with the Contractor, issue the NTP with the following understanding that the Contractor shall do the following activities: a. Proceed with preparation of submittals, shop drawings, project schedule, and other similar - requirements in the contract. b. Not be all owed on site until the requirements of Section 0154? Personnei Security have been tulfilled for the Contractor's Project Manager and Superintendent. c. Provide the requirements of the Preliminary Outline Schedule in Section 01311 Network Anaiysis Scheduies at the preconst'ruction meeting. d. Commence personnel security process on remaining staff for project. e. Not be allowed to commence work on site until the Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan has been approved by the Contracting Of?cer. 1.4 DESCRIPTION OF WORK A The Worl of this project comprises certain repairs and improvements to the existing interior of Building located at CDC's Roybal campus. These repairs and improvements include, but are not limited to, the following aspects as further defined and described in the Contract Documents: SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Revised September 8, 2010 iliit'3i'12 US Ila} 262mb; Ihir'9i 42' US I: 262th BUT UNCLASSIFIED IN FORMATION Section 0101 [13 Summary of Work P2009453 - Hires. I Mechanical 1. Tap into the existing 7'2 14 supply ductworlt in interstitial space and route new ductwork to new pneumatic phoenix subply valve. Route two 11" round ducts to two new phoenix valves and one 10" round duct to relocated existing phoenix valve. Route to new heating coils. 2. Contractor to field verify fit and routing of new ductworl-t with existing conditions. Route all main du as high as possible. 3. Transition from new phoenix valves outlet to 14x12 heating coils. See appendix for attached heating coil selection. 4. Core slab penetrations as shown on floor slab in interstitial space and per architectural and structural requirements. Slab penetration locations to be determined by nondestructive testing. Nondestructive testing to be done on the first day of the lab shut down to verify that no conduit is in the slab at proposed openings. Nondestructive testing to be done under separate CDC contract. 6. Route new 12 12 ductwork from the new phoenix valve through new slab penetrations to new supply air diffusers in the corridor. 7. Provide out of floor fire damper Ruskin Model DIDB20 (Type BC) in interstitial before slab penetration. Install per manufacturer and SMACNA ?re damper out of wailfflocr installation instructions. Diffusers shall be 12 12; Titus model number Provide gas tight bubble damper at each diffuser. Re-route fire sprinkler pipe it required. CDC to provide ?As-Built? of sprinkler pipe in the mitts-:42 LJ sea; 2?2a-hi 11. Tap into existing hot water supply and return pipes and route new 1? pipes to new reheat coils. Provide new hot water two way control valves to match existing control valves at existing heating coils. 12. Provide all associated controls and devices to make a complete supply system. 13. Insulate supply ductwork and hot water pipe. All devices, materials and equipment to match existing unless specified otherwise. 14. Provide missing opposed blade balancing dampers on existing ductwork as identified by baseline Test and Balance Report. 15. Provide new water proof temperature sensor in new wall of new heating coils. 16. Provide painlable silicone to seal diffusers in corridor. 17'. Remove existing exhaust grille in elevator lobby roomD-to-pressurize spaceand patch. PEI . architectural requirements. Demolish existing ductwork and phoenix valve back to main trunk. Re?use existing 8" round phoenix valve. 18. Replace two counterbalanced isolation dampers atl - I Counterbala_nce__darnpers to be sized and selected by fan manufacturer. Contractor to field verity dimensions before ordering dampers. 19. Replace two low leakage motorized bypass dampers at I Bypass be sized and selected by fan manufacturer. Contractor '0 field verify dimensions before ordering. 20. Provide motor sheaves for fans if required by Test and Balance after construction and during commissioning. 21. Tap into existing exposed elbow and add new stainless steel thermal double wall 12 to supply ductworK in shower anteroom, route to new 12 12 diffuser; Titus Model number SUORS-SS with opposed blade balancing damper. Contractor to field verity existing conditions for location and fit of ductwork and diffuser. 22. Test and Balance of exhaust and supply systems in the Vivarium to be done under separate contract. rim-[3 it: I: 2.5.2.31'1 tints Joust: sesam- 4E UEC a 252mm $113.24? LI 9 '3 2523]]: 23. Near the end of construction Test and Balance will perform preliminary fan 24. Repair torn and add missing insulation on ductwork and pipe for all pipe and ductwork related to AHU- .l -- I identify location of 3: plugs fortuture. 25. Seal air leakage at existing six fire dampers located in the interstitial that-serves the clean corridors. SENSITIVE our UNCLASSIFIED iNFoFiMitTioN rseui Revised September 3,2010 [tn-[3 USE mill-4315:: 2; 2:32am [Inlet-1?2 US Cl 252mm 262mm LIE 252.3th1- U520 SENSITJVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED IN FORMATION (SBLI) CDC P2009453 - Section 010104 .HVAC Summary of Work 26. Contractor to provide drawings. Provide shop drawings, and submittals via hard copy and electronically. 28. Contractor shall provide detailed sheet metal and pipe shop drawings for CDC approval. 29. Glass slot size shall be verified with CDC before ordering glass. 30. Replace filters in animal holding rooms. 33.1. .Plualaq drains. .insastinolaa plenum .an -. 32951 tar-i plenum hog provideg'aslteted #5123112 accessdopr'vailj door'handle that Ioclts. Door is to provida irisvalirand oecsaadoqr existing MG hoailiao: clamor? Control Work Blasting two position control In creosote; 5m?; Mono:- ZEiist'ingControl Sequence 'shatl During fart operation, HAS system ahall?modulale both: located? at'tll'e' roilflex'haust plenum. in ?nisdnaio' ?mai?lain exhaustatallcz .presaura..lh_ilial_ .aelpoint Liana"? oora?a; Jae .. Dria fan failyreassensedgby 'oneio'f the tvvo?currentiswitches; antalarmsh all be sent. Exhaust plenum contr'olldampersifshall continue .On?failure of. both fans {35" sensed aha? he genatalsd-aorl-tt1a .. Upon ?s'etpointi'a be generated. [his "warning alarmgpoi?rll is'the point where'the'P hoeniit'exh'aust vavl'es begin-to lose On adr'on belpw'ilt??iladi} ass -- the scheduled '_a_i_rflow as. measUred by?the airflow station; an= alarm TAB contractormill determine theactual 'Tlow-peroentage that repr - and that shall Stop. Exh??tf?s plenUm- control dampersshall modulate to?maintain a 1.0" (adj) exhaust duict-istatlc. i cannot-be. maintained thatallowafor'a sale egress from the area. Basement shall stop. dampers will-modulate to maintain static setpoint.., Safe egress exhauslduct static pressure: {will cooler:th Easel-?af?ne. streams." altall oeoassimilated; Existing Qoh'trol Sequence shall remainwith[modifications gm. therthe'exhau stzfan'COntrol-danlper shall modulate to maintain a? 1.0? l'adil?l nega?lrie aorta-sag Architectural Remove-doc and till opening with concrete masonry. Finish wall with epoxy paint. 2. Provide new window in new infill wall. 3. Provide new concrete masonry wall in Corridorm. install new automatic opening. ERanillg door in new masonry wall. Install metal wall guards at masonry wall. Finish wall with epoxy paint. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEIUJ Revised September 8. 2010 .. . '3 2'32-3ih; lover-42 so a .2?2a-l1; mils-42 use a 2623- I?ll LI 9 Ct? 26.25141: IIJIIEI :12 U5 2523m- [132.3142 us 262.3%: coc P2009453 - Hypo MODIFICATIONS FOR I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI Section 010105 Summary of Work 4. Remove existing directional airflow 'ping-pong? indicator devices from approximately 33 doors. Install manufacturer supplied caps to resulting penetrations in walls. Provide new rubber door sweepsrbottoms to approximately 12 doors. 5. Remove existing vision glass from approximately 30 doors. Replace with new glass sized to leave air gaps in doors. 8. Provide new full gasket sets to three sets of doors. Resulting door assemblies to seal to gasutight condition when closed. [mg-.42 50 mm? 7. Paint the ceiling bays at each new slab penetration in with epoxy paint- WORK BY THE GOVERNMENT A. The Government has a direct contrast with the test and balance tirrn. CDC will also decontaminate the area prior to commencement of work in the animal area and after completion of work. No other work by CDC is anticipated for this Project. 1.5 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PRODUCTS A. No products or materials will be furnished by the Government for this Project- 1.6 CONTRACTOR USE OF SITE AND PREMISES A. B. D. SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION Limit use of site and premises to allow: 1. Reg rand continued use of, and access to, immediate area around and adjacent walkways and CDC parking area. Construction Operations: Limit construction operations to the areas noted on drawings. Government security at CDC facilities requires that the Contractor and all agents remain in the area designated by the limit of work in the Contract Documents. Failure to observe this requirement is grounds for dismissal of the offending party. Repeated violations may be grounds for dismissal otthe Contractor, or agent at fault, or both. 1. Contractors on exterior projects shall not be allowed access to the interior of any CDC building, except to perform work scheduled in an interior space. Time Restrictions for Performing Work: All Work which cannot be performed during normal duty hours shall require the Contractor to submit a schedule of anticipated Work to the Contracting Officer prior to execution of the Work. This includes utility outages, work on Federal holidays, and other activities. Known activities include the following: 1. Utility Outages and Shutdown: The Contractor shall arrange with the Contracting Officer. Utility outages and associated work shall be scheduled from 5:00 pm to 6:00 am, Monday through Thursday. or6:00 pm, Friday, to 6:00 am, Monday. The Contractor shall request such outages a minimum of 10 days prior to shutdown. There shall be no exceptions to the 10 day minimum requirement. 2. Work on Weekends, Federal holidays and other requests: The Contractor shall arrange with the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall provide such request a minimum of 5 days prior to scheduled Work. Site Conditions: The Contractor, shall upon completion of the Work, repair, alter, remove, andror replace exterior materials to conform to each material's condition prior to commencement of work. Revised September 3, 2010 thit?124EU 23 at I .16, t1. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFOHMRTIDN ibii3- :12 us. i: .5, CDC P2009453 - I I Section 010106 seam -HVAC-MODIFICATIONS Foal- Summary of Work E. Project Cleanup and Closeout. An amount equal to 10% of the contract amount, including all modifications, will be held by the Contracting Officer until all project cleanup and closeout requirements have been performed by the Contractor and acceptable to the Contracting Officer. 1. Project cleanup and closeout issues that the Contractor shall be responsible forinclude, but are not limited to, the following: a) Removal of all debris, excess materials, and equipment brought on site bythe Contractor or any agent of the Contractor. Removal, replacement. or refurbishment as required of all Government utilities used during execution of the work. cj Submission and resubmission if required, of all closeout documents required by this project. These include resolution of final inspection listing, operating and maintenance manuals, staff training, warranty information, as?built documents, and others as listed in the relevant specification sections. 2. Prior to Final Acceptance, the Contractor shall request a review of these issues by the Contracting Officer. Upon successful completion of the review, and When all defective issues have been resolved to the satisfaction of the Contracting Officer, the affected funds will be released. Limit use of site and premises to allow: 1. Government occupancy of the building. I 2. Use of site and adjacent spaces by the Government and the public for normal daily operations and functions. GOVERNMENT (USER) OCCUPANCY US 36331? People (CDC em ployeesfvisito'r'sj'iriwill occupy its premises, including but not limited to the project area, during the entire period of construction. Contractor is to keep in consideration the access and egress needs of these occupants. B. Cooperate with the Government, represe b, - by the Contracting Officer. to minimize conflict, and to facilitate the daily operations of Building as well as other buildings and facilities on the Roybal Campus. (3. Schedule the Work to accommodate this requirement 1.8 DOCUMENT SECURITY A. Document security is important to the Government. The documents provided to you in anyformat are sensitive and you must take provisions to protect the confidentiality of the information. The requirements below are intended to supplement CDC's current documents security policy. By acceptance of any printed or electronic documents, you agree to the following: 1. The documents shall not be transmitted to a third party without written permission of the Contracting Officer. Refer to Part 2 of this specification section for the Document Tracking Log. 2. All documents shall be returned at the conclusion ofthe project. No documents shall be kept for any purpose by you, your ?rm, or any of your subcontractors, suppliers, or agents. Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. 3. All electronic files shall be deleted from storage devices (computers, zip drives, hand held devices, and such}. Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. 4. All and magnetic disk shall be returned to the Contracting Officer. Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Fievised September B, 2010 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBIJ) MM: W: a CDC P2009453 - Section 01010? :azam HVAC MODIFICATIONS Summary of Work 5. All devices that contain electronic information shall be protected by password. 8. All printed documents shall be stored in a secure area until returned to the Contracting Officer. T. Return of all required documents and media shall be part of the project's completion and closeout requirements, and shall be satisfactorily completed prior to approval of final invoice. 1.9 GOVERNMENT USE OF THE SITE A. Interior: The following is a brief description of Government use of the site that may have varying effects on the execution of the Work required under this contract. 1. The re uirements and demands for Government operations, schedules, and programs in will continue to occur throughout the construction period. Response to these requirements and demands will be met by the Government in spaces adjacent to the project area. Therefore, it is very critical that construction activities for this project, including workers, equipment, and materials, have minimal potential for disruption to Government activities in the spaces adjacent to the project location. Notify and coordinate with project officer when interior occupants could be affected by exterior work activities. IbiiS'L-iE DEC 332th . .. B. Exterior: The following is a brief description of Government use of the site that may have varying effects on the execution of the Work required under this contract. 1. The operation and function of the adjacent buildings and spaces will continue during the construction period of this project. Pedestrians, vehicles, equipment, and goods will continue to be present in adjacent exterior spaces to the construction site. 2. A schedule of Contractor vehicular movement of dumpsters, deliveries, and other similar issues shall be provided to the Contracting Officer for approval to maintain safety and minimize disruptions and conflicts to all parties. Activities concerning placement of dumpsters and storage a removal of hazardous materials, will only be executed after guidance from the Project O?icer. 3. The Contractor shall provide a delivery schedule of all equipment and materials to the Contracting Officer at least to calendar days prior to the earliest scheduled delivery that requires the use of the loading dock. The Contracting Officer will coordinate Government use of the loading dock with Contractor requests and accommodate such requests to the greatest extent possible. 1.10 CONTRACTOR ACTIONS UPON NOTICE OF CONTRACT AWARD A. The information in this paragraph in no way supersedes, negates, or defines the requirements contained in the Contract. Unless otherwise specifically addressed with different requirements in the Contract terms and conditions, the Contractor shall immediately initiate the following actions upon receipt of the Notice of Award: 1. Fulfill requirements of Section 0154? Personnel Security Requirements for the Contractores Superintendent and Project Manager. The Contractor will not be allowed on site until these requirements are met. The Government will not be responsible nor liable for any delays to the Work for the Contractor?s inability or failure to obtain timely clearances or sufficient numbers of cleared personnel. 2. Prepare and submit to the Contracting Of?cer the required Comprehensive Heaitn and Safety Plan. The Contractor will not be allowed to commence work on site until the Comprehensive Health and Safety Pian has been approved by the Contracting Officer. Any delays caused by the Contractor's failure to obtain an approved Comprehensive Heaitn and Safety Pian shall be attributed to the Contractor and shall not be considered an excusable delay. 3. Take action and complete all effort necessary to produce and present the Preliminary Outline SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED {sec} Ftevised September a, soft: SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBLJ) CDC P2009453 - Section 010103 5 . MODIFICATIONS - -- Summary oi Work Schedule in 01311 Nenvodr Schedules at the meeting. The Contractor shall be considered delinquent in pedormance it these documents are not ready for presentation at the preconstruction meeting. 4. Commence personnel security process on project's workers. 5. Proceed with preparation of submittals. shop drawings. and other similar requirements of the contract. 6. Anticipate receiving formal Notice to Proceed from the Contracting Officer within 28 calendar days after Notice of Award. It is customary, but not required, forthe Contracting Cfiicer to issue Notice to Proceed at the preconstruction meeting. PAFIT 2 PRODUCTS A. Document Tracking Log. Attachment is the form to be used upon approval by the Contracting Officer of request to provide documents to a. third party. TEMPLATE - ocument Tracking L. PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Revised Saplember B. 2010 Mathe, Chester From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent; Thursday, October 14, 201 0 8:12 AM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George . Schedule Art: Thanks for sending schedule update. Do you have a current scope? The last scope document we were provided was dated July 15, and I believe it may have been modified during negotiations. I have sent via separate e-mail. Also, is there an air balance diagram that the TABcontractor will be working from? Appreciate the help. Paul Message?"- From: Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:00 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Sh'hiect; gm: Schedule Please see the attached schedule for the current schedule for the a inflow .. .. . Easels; Art 'From: Avery W. Wood IV [mailtozawood@willismech.corn] Sent: Thursday, October 2010 2:32 PM To: Mickie, Lenore Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. 'Grant Willis'; Moss, Karen 53:51:? Lenore, See the attached revised schedule based on the revised work durations. As you can see, these durations are longer than we anticipated. Because the is not in WMI scope, has not planned to have a representative on site during this time. While the change 'does not add anv cost to both the lab shut down and contract completion dates are show pushed out lay-the difference in work durations. We now show contract completion on Also, please note the our schedule assumeswe will. be releasing the equipment todav (10-7-10). Without approved submittals for our long lead equipment, the schedule will begin to be impacted. Thanks, Avery W. Wood IV 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 67'8 966 0094 Work 678 966 9420 Fax --~--Origina From: Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 12:05 PM To: Avery W. Wood IV Subject: FW: 92009453 CDC : Schedule {one} 42 0.5 252mm Avery, Please update your schedule to reflect these dates for the Test and Balance portion of the contract. Art From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:21 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. 31522:}? Ef?e: .FW: Ramses 3. CDC : Schedule Art, I talked with the TAB Contractor todaylhe has been out of the country and unavailable}. He needs 30 working days to complete the field TAB work. Willis has TAB starting on Friday, December 3rd, 30 working days out from that has him onJanuary 1401.1 - - I The report process will start on the January 1?th and be delivered on the 24th ofJanuary. He agreed to do commissioning while the formal report process is ongoing. Which means TAB commissioning would start on the 17th and the TAB report would be updated as work is done in the field; this is not a normal process. Normally the formal report process would not start until commissioning is complete. The earliest TAB would have reports delivered to the CDC for review would be on January 24th and would take a couple of days to review. We discussed the MLK holiday in January, I am not sure contractors can work on a government holiday or not but he said they could take the Monday off and work the Saturday before if need be. Please have Willis Mechanical update his schedule to reflect this information. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS K-97 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 404?825~682? Fax: 770?433-2667 email: KMossl@cdc.gov Message-~? From: Avery W. Wood IV [mailtozavvood@willismech.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:23 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: 'Grant Willis'; Moss, Karen Mickle, Lenore $3533? Shb?ectr DC. Sched ule Art, See attached updated and revised schedule based on CDC comments at the meeting yesterday. This schedule is based on most current lead times and durations of work. Please let me know if anything needs to be changed. Thanks, Avery W. Wood IV 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 678 966 0094 Work 678 965 9420 Fax Ce? From: Mickie, Lenore Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:0? PM To: Grant Willis; Tyler, John Moss, Karen Iwillis@willismech.com; Daniels, Charles E. Riley, Steve Lingler, Arthur R. Avery W. Wood IV Subject: P2009453 Sign?in 10/04f10 RE: _Today's Pro-construction Meeting, Roster Attached is a copy of the sign-in sheet, per your request. Thank you, Lenore Mickle CDC, Procurement and Grants Office Buildings and Facilities Contracts Branch Phone: 770-488-2623 Fax: 770-488?2847 LMickle@cdc.gov This e?mail and any files transmitted with it contain 0.5. Government information that is OFFICIAL USE or other types of SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED information requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure. All information is confidential, intended solely for the addressee and shall be disseminated only on a TO basis. To provide feedback on your recent experiences with PGO, email Feedback will be used to improve business services. From: Koger Colgate 2316 (near) Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:00 PM To: Mickie, Lenore Subject: P2009453 Sign-in 10/04/10 Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wedneec ax, October 13, 2010 1 ?1 :06 PM To: ?23' 939,, ii?p? 5?7 (CDCIOCOOIOSHElschedule CDQ 10-7-2010.mpp; CDC 2523th i FYI --?Clrigina From: Prohst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 7:32 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) lcoc/ocoo/OSHE) ai??ilii g'i'l?liif?iiti edule Bill: Just ran across this. Have not opened it. Curious what it says. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Lingler, Arthur Fl. To: Frobst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Sent: Tue Oct 12 12:59:56 2010 SEBECFFWE P2909453 cot: Schedule Please see the attached schedule for the current schedule for the .. . .. .42 5.1?1.5 .. Art From: Avery W. Wood lV Sent: Thursday, October 2010 2:32 PM To: Mickie, Lenore Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Iwillis@willismech.com; 'Grant Willis'; Moss, Karen wastes; coc Schedule Lenore, See the attached revised schedule based on the revised work durations. As you can see, these durations are longer than we anticipated. Because the T813 is not in WWII scope, WMI has not planned to have a representative on site during this time. While the change does not add any cost to WMI, both the [ab shut down and contract completion dates are show pushed out by the difference in work durations. We now show contract completion on 2116;11. Also, please note the our schedule assumes we will be releasing the equipment today (10-7-10). Without approved submittals for our long lead equipment, the schedule will begin to be impacted. Thanks, Avery W. Wood IV 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 678 966 0094 Work 678 966 9420 Fax Message-??- From: Lingler, Arthur R. {coc/ocoo/aro] [mailtorarl3@cdc.gov] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 12:05 PM To: Avery w. Wood IV =12 as?. Schedule Avery, Please update your schedule to re?ect these dates for the Test and Balance portion of the contract. Art Message-?-? From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:21 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIUCDOIBFO) I. Ccleaniels, Charles E. BFO 920094.53 c-oc- Schedule Art, I talked with the TAB Contractor today(he has been out of the country and unavailable]. He needs 30 working days to complete the field TAB work. Willis has TAB starting on Friday, December 3rd, 30 working days out from that has him anuaryr 14th. I- - I I. The report process will start on the January 17th and be delivered on the 24th of January. He agreed to do commissioning while the formal report process is ongoing. Which means TAB commissioning would start on the 1?th and the TAB report would be updated as work is done in the ?eld; this is not a normaI process. Normally the formal report process would not start until commissioning is complete. The earliest TAB would have reports delivered to the CDC for review would be on January 24th and would take a couple of days to review. We discussed the MLK holiday in January, I am not sure contractors can work on a government holiday or not but he said they could take the Monday off and work the Saturday before if need be. Ih?i?: Please have Willis Mechanical update his schedule to re?ect this information. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office; 270-488-8307 Cell: 404-825-6327 IIJIIE: Fax: 7370-1183-2663? email: KMossl@cdc.gov Messag From: Avery W. Wood IV Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:23 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: 'Grant Willis'; Moss, Karen Mickie, Lenore Subject: P2009453 Art, See attached updated and revised schedule based on CDC comments at the meeting yesterday. This schedule is based on most current lead times and durations ofwork. Please let me know ifanything needs to be changed. Thanks, Avery W. Wood IV 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 678 966 0094 Work 673 966 9420 Fax Cell From: Mickie, Lenore Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:07 PM To: Grant Willis,- Tyler, John Moss, Karen Daniels, Charles E. Riley, Steve Lingler, Arthur R. Avery W. Wood IV Subject: P2009453 Sign-in 10/04/10 RE: Today's Pre-construction Meeting, Roster Attached is a copy of the sign-in sheet, per your request. Thankyou, Lenore Mickie CDC, Procurement and Grants Office Buildings and Facilities Contracts Branch Phone: 770-488-2623 Fax: 770?433?2234? LMickie@cdc.gov This e-mail and any ?les transmitted with it contain U.S. Government information that is OFFICIAL USE ONL or other types of SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED information requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure. All information is con?dential, intended solely for the addressee and shall be disseminated only on a TO basis. To provide feedback on your recent experiences with PGO, email Feedback will be used to improve business services. Message??~ From: Koger Colgate 2816 (near) Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:00 PM To: Mickie, Lenore Subject: P2009453 Sign-in 101?04/10 Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device. Willis . Ichanltal . nmrpamted HVAD Madilicatlon P2009453 Roybal Campus Twill-n: Hum nan-m - - . Irgaan??iliuih?l uum- Truanqu nus-mans whwa 1' _a :2 i, i 1' WMI sou. a'iliriu magma-w i mun-m "2.1m Tun mam Uminsnn 2' 5 5 5 i aim mum-rm Fum'mu' i 5 mTule?-d um, uni-?rm: trans-'9 i i i 5. a {um-in w?i?imu'sp'sz?m? i .3 55.7mm "n?u'l?un wanna -, 3 'c?tu: an" Indm ?m?iwmwm?rm a 3 i 55mmum- - '1 i i i "wi?n?i?i'i? innit-mam WudwwrThu mnn' warmThu-1W!? 'n w- i i I?mi'? 1min 15mm Wammlu a - nu mum vam- 23:5?irHirT I 1' Auapl Wan linm? Mamma'TuWi 5 I 4 waiia'anu'i'z'sg'a'usIr'anlaum Mari! 'anJ?a-i? "'Tr?i?a?rin 2'22: 1 5 El int-Ir." rnlzi'mirin "unlimalm in" i 1r i Piggy?? I mm? qummiin ?fl-MM . . . . gnaw A 1hr. M?a??h?i i- 5 1: 3 5 sum 1aap' 1m 11ml! file i'ilim? 29 i i i i stuut?nanuImLta-n am'. Item 1mm i i . . . Email-Lu: nup.? ?audio i If!" 1 5 Ni: s??w?m 1mm 15.232mil-.255 i I . 35 4 am: Wad Heme $3333Iv- 1i? ""?imu Madam. ?I'n'?mmncom"mg?"man ?r??imrn ILL '15? mtiml 1! dig-11. Tuaumu udriurzz'm- i . "mp-Lt Mm- .I ?mt. .w?dnm? as . Hmrmasuhuidussay 4am Fri ii ?'l'uli'ud?IHH?xiln 41 i qunriLe'Sls'li uni Carbon" 4- Wanna-now 2.1m 1w11ma mammary mmwuudunnoa mum Inna-19 nor-11mm mini: Doc} fa 5 n} Ia Tchc?cm? "new" 2 1 Mia-hm- nu -, mam-.3. I ?xia??'rjhaainnihui' 1m' Mu'imiu i i 3 i Wn'llc?n'uul??umhai u' Minn ?m'i?uilTtr?l'il Emu-rumor? Mail'"_ le 1mm 'En :?zarh i i a 3: 1333; ir?'i'iiui'i "iuisa'a'risii'r'srTw'mpnm mar-auras i i 5 3 ??nnhlu?? mwm?? hut- ?nuhn?ldul mm Elm-1m. _imlm 4} ??ii Mathe, Chester From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, October 13. 2010 11:05 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) D0c: Raymond, George OIBFO) ISchedule SD 252W Attachments: CDC CDC Schedule 10-7-10.pdf Ken: lam on e-mail tonight, and forwarded this to Bill Howard. Looks like the shutdown will extend from Nov. 2 to January 24. This is three more weeks than I shared with HOG back on September 23rd. We may get a volatile reaction. The 30 days for seems way out there. I have several concerns beyond the schedule, and Will take them up with Art and copy Tanya if necessary. 1. Bill Howard and OSHE have not seen an Air Balance diagram that represents the new air-flows. This has not been I shared by DEMO. 2. We are 2 112 weeks away from shutting down the lab, and have not been provided an updated scope. The last scope we received was August 2nd, but have not been advised of any updates, or if updates occurred. I have copied George because of our concern about the controls. Craig Bellflower probably knows better than anyone the current controls scope. 3. Looks like Art is holding the bag now - see previous e-mail from Charles. Paul From: Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:00 PM grobst, Paul E. {cociocwtreirs William P. 2553?s; Subject: P2009453-C0 Schedule USE Please see the attached schedule for the current schedule for the project. . Art --?-Origina Message-?n From: Avery W. Wood IV [mailtmawood@willismech.com] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:32 PM To: Mickle, Lenore m?mggc 'ngler, Arthur R. Iv 'Grant Willis'; Moss, Karen 3525"?? Schedule Lenore, See the attached revised schedule based on the revised work durations. As you can see, these durations are longer than we anticipated. Because the is not in scope, has not planned to have a representative on site during this time. While the change does not add any cost to WMI, both the lab shut down and contract completion dates are show pushed out by the difference in work durations. We now show contract completion on 2f16/11. Also, please note the our schedule assumes we will be releasing the equipment today [10-7-10]. Without approved submittals for our long lead equipment, the schedule will begin to be impacted. Thanks, Avery W. Wood IV 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 628 966 0094 Work 678 966 9420 Fax --?-Driginal Message?m- From: Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Thursday, October 2010 12:05 PM To: Avery W. Wood IV 3553;}? FWREZQOSASS. CDC . Schedule Avery, Please update your schedule to reflect these dates for the Test and Balance portion of the contract. Art ?u-Original From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, Dctober06, 2010 4:21 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. I Cc: Daniels, Charles E. s?bfectt?w: P2009453 coc Schedule Art, I talked with the TAB Contractor today(he has been out of the country and unavailable]. He needs 30 working days to complete the field TAB work. Willis has TAB starting on Friday, December 3rd, 30 working days out from that has him ?nishing Iappmx?lmatem on January . .. . The report process will start on the January 17th and be delivered on the 24th ofJanuary. He agreed to do commissioning while the formal report process is ongoing. Which means TAB commissioning would start on the 17th and the TAB report would be updated as work is done in the ?eld; this is not a normal process. Normally the formal report process would not start until commissioning is complete. The earliest TAB would have reports delivered to the CDC for review would be on January 24th and would take a couple of days to review. We discussed the MLK holiday in January, I am not sure contractors can work on a government holiday or not but he said they could take the Monday off and work the Saturday before if need be. Please have Willis Mechanical update his schedule to reflect this information. Regards, mils} Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-488?3307 Cell: 404-325-6827 Fax: 770-488~2657 email: KMoss1@cdc.gov ??-Original From: Avery W. Wood IV Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:23 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: 'Grant Willis'; Moss, Karen Mickie, Lenore Subject: P2009453 CDC ?3?33 . Schedule Art, See attached updated and revised schedule based on CDC comments at the meeting yesterday. This schedule is based on most current lead times and durations of work. Please let me know if anything needs to be changed. Thanks, Avery W. Wood IV 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle 092 Mnrr? ?ll ru'ork ?ax Ilzllul?r I Message--?-- From: Mickie, Lenore (CDCKOCOOXPGD) Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:0?r PM To: Grant Willis; Tvler, John Moss, Karen lwillis@willismech.com; Daniels, Charles E. Riley, Steve (CDC/ocowarol; Lingler, Arthur R. [CDC/ocoo/erol; Avery w. Wood Iv Subject: P2009453 Sign-in 10/04/10 RE: Today's Pre?construction Meeting, Roster Attached is a copy of the sign-in sheet, peryour request. Thank you, Lenore. Mickle CDC, Procurement and Grants Office Buildings and Facilities Contracts Branch Phone: Fax: 770?433?284? LMickle@cdc.gov This e-mail and any ?les transmitted with it contain US. Government information that is OFFICIAL USE or other types of SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED information requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure. All information is confidential, intended solely for the addressee and shall be disseminated only on a TO basis. . - To provide feedback on your recent experiences with PGD, email Feedback will be used to improve business services. From: Koger Colgate 2816 (near) Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:00 PM To: Mickle, Lenore Subject: P2009453 Sign-in 10i04/10 Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 7:32 PM Howard, William {Bil IDSHE) 25.2310: . .. .. . chedule 0 IQ Fl ?9 Attachments: CDC ?523?? 10-7-201 Umpp; coo 4? Schedule Bill: Just ran across this. Have not opened it. Curious what it says. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message I From: Lingler, Arthur R. To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Sent: Tue Oct 12 12:59:56 2010 his? 22009453 cor: Schedule 42 US CHE Please see the attached schedule for the current schedule for the airflow project; - . . . Art ?--0riginal From: Aver];r W. Wood IV Sent: Thursdav, October 07, 2010 2:32 PM To: Mickle, Lenore Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. 'Grant Willis'; Moss, Karen Subject: RE: P2009453 CDC Lenore, See the attached revised schedule based on the T843 revised work durations. As you can see, these durations are longer than we anticipated. Because the is not in scope, WMI has not planned to have a representative on site during this time. While the change does not add any cost to WMI, both the lab shut down and contract completion dates are show pushed out by the difference in work durations. We now show contract completion on 2/16/11. Also, please note the our schedule assumes we will be releasing the equipment today Without approved submittals for our long lead equipment, the schedule will begin to be impacted. Thanks, Avery W. Wood IV 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 678 966 0094 Work 966 9420 Fax I:lcen . mire: 42 42 IlliiEI; --?-Original From: tingler, Arthur R. Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 12:05 PM To: Avery W. Wood IV E?hfectarw; ezoosass. coc Schedule Avery, Please update your schedule to reflect these dates for the Test and Balance portion of the contract. Art From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:21 PM To: tingler, Arthur R. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. 32099453. coo Sched ule Art, I talked with the TAB Contractor today(he has been out of the country and unavailable]. He needs 30 working days to complete the field TAB work. Willis has has him process wilI start on the January 17th and be delivered on the 24th ofJanuary. He agreed to do commissioning while the formal report process is ongoing. Which means TAB commissioning would start on the 17th and the TAB report would be updated as work is done in the ?eld; this is not a normal process. Normally the formal report process would. not start until commissioning is complete. The earliest TAB would have reports delivered to the CDC for review would be on January 24th and would take a couple of days to review. We discussed the MLK holiday in January, I am not sure contractors can work on a government holiday or not but he said they could take the Monday off and work the Saturday before if need be. Please have Willis Mechanical update his schedule to reflect this information. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 404-825-6327 Fax: 770-488-2567 email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Avery W. Wood lV Sent: Tuesday, October 05,2010 1:23 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIUCOOXBFOI Cc: ?Grant Willis'; Moss, Karen lwillis@willismech.com; Mickle, Lenore mild. 112 252mm state; 92009453 --c-oc Schedule Art, See attached updated and revised schedule based on CBC comments at the meeting yesterday. This schedule is based on most current lead times and durations of work. Please let me know if anything needs to be changed. Thanks, Avery W. Wood IV 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 673 956 0094 Work Cell Message"? From: Mickle, Lenore Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:07 PM To:Tyler, John Moss, Karen Ivvillis@willismech.com; Daniels, Charles E. Riley, Steve Lingler, Arthur R. Avery W. Wood IV Subject: P2009453 Sign-in 10/04/10 RE: Today's Pre-construction Meeting, Roster Attached is a copy of the sign-in sheet, per your request. Thank you, Lenore Mickie CDC, Procurement and Grants Office Buildings and Facilities Contracts Branch Phone: 770-483-2523 Fax: This e?mail and any files transmitted with it contain U.S. Government information that is OFFICIAL USE or other types of SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED information requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure. All information is con?dential, intended solely for the addressee and shall be disseminated only on a TO basis. To provide feedback on your recent experiences with P60, email Feedback will be used to improve business services. Message-?-- From: Koger Colgate 2816 (near) Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:00 PM To: Mickie, Lenore Subject: P2009453 Signnin Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device. Mathe, Chester From: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIB F0) Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:00 PM To: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO Nogueira. William P. gtgi?gil?i?fbject: . Schedule I CE sea-:3 CDC .. Schedule - - mtg-.42 us as Please see the attached schedule for the current schedule for the air?ow . Art ?~~Driginal Message--?- From: Averyr W. Wood l?v? Sent: Thursday, October 2010 2:32 PM To: Mickie, Lenore Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. BFU 'Grant Willis?; Moss, Karen $552?? safest; 66102009463 coc -- .Schedule Lenore, See the attached revised schedule based on the T303 revised work durations. As you can see, these durations are longer than we anticipated. Because the is not in WMI scope, WWII has not planned to have a representative on site during this time. While the change does not add any cost to WMI, both the lab shut down and contract completion dates are show pushed out by the difference in work durations. We now show contract completion on 2.116101. Also, please note the our schedule assumes we will be releasing the equipment todav (1051-101. Without approved submittals for our long lead equipment, the schedule will begin to be impacted. Thanks, Avery W. Wood IV 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 673 966 0094 Work 6?6 966 9420 Fax h?rE: ell --?-Original Message-"h From: Lingler, Arthur R. [mailtozarl3@cdc.gov] Sent: Thursday, October 03', 2010 12:05 PM To: Avery W. Wood IV $33142 2.32am; asset; cac Schedule Avery, Please Update your schedule to re?ect these dates for the Test and Balance portion of the contract. Art Message-"u- From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:21 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Daniels, Charles E. .mrs: s: so bpct; FW: chedule 2023th Art, I talked with the TAB Contractor todaylhe has been out of the country and unavailable). He needs 30 working days to complete the ?eld TAB work. Willis has TAB starting on Friday, December 3rd, 30 working days out from that has him finishing. approximately onJanua-ry - The report process will start on the January 17th and be delivered on the 24th of January. He agreed to do commissioning while the formal report process is ongoing. Which means TAB commissioning would start on the 1?th and the TAB report would be updated as work is done in the ?eld; this is not a normal process. Normally the formal report process would not start until commissioning is complete. The earliest TAB would have reports delivered to the CDC for review would be on January 24th and would take a couple of days to review. We discussed the MLK holiday in January, lam not sure contractors can work on a government holiday or not but he said they could take the Monday off and work the Saturday before if need be. I l] :15 Please have Willis Mechanical update his schedule to reflect this information. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1500 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-488-8307 Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: 770-488-2667 email: KMossl@cdc.gov --?-Original From: Avery W. Wood IV Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:23 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: 'Grant Willis'; Moss, Karen lwillis@willismech.com; Mickie, Lenore 3953.51: S'E??fe?iti .PZQ09453 CDC Schedule Art, See attached updated and revised schedule based on CDC comments at the meeting yesterday. This schedule is based on most current lead times and durations of work. Please let me know if anything needs to be changed. Thank; Avery W. Wood Iv 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 STE 956 0094 Work 673 966 9420 Fax Cell r-mDriginal Message-?-?- From: Mickie, Lenore Se at: Monday. October 04, 2010 12:07 PM To NW Tyler, John Moss, Karen lwillis@willismech.com; Daniels, Charles E. Riley, Steve (CDC/ocooxaroi; Lingler, Arthur R. (coefocoofaroi; Avery w. Wood IV Subject: P2009453 Sign~in 10/04f10 FIE: Today's Pre-construction Meeting, Roster Attached is a copy of the sign-in sheet, per your request. Thank you, Lenore Mickie CDC, Procurement and Grants Office Buildings and Facilities Contracts Branch Phone: 77'0?483?2623 Fax: 7'7'0-488-2847 LMickle@cdc.goy This e-mail and any files transmitted with it contain U.S. Government information that is OFFICIAL USE or other types of SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED information requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure. All information is confidential, intended solely for the addressee and shall be disseminated only on a TO basis. To provide feedback on your recent experiences with PGD, email Feedback will be used to improve business services. From: Koger Colgate 2816 (near) Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:00 PM To: Mickle, Lenore Subject: P20094153 Sign-in 10/04f10 Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device. use. 26 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Browning, Daniel A. Sent: Tuesday, August 2012 1:43 PM To: Maths ester (CDCIOCOOJOSEP) $3635, . . .. .. Air Flow Reversal - 2010 Nov 8.: Dee From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 9:46 PM i To: Brownin Daniel A. Henderson, Josenh (CDCIOCOOIDSEP) a ivarium Air Flow Reversal 2010 Nov 8: Dec - RE rivarium REEWJ. FW: P2009453 - Re: P2009453 - PW: P2039453 - RE: Vivarium Vivarium Testing wait Fix Observation Rep. .. Observation Observation Testing oneroust: - .- . . Rat'de Bid ivarlum FW: P2009453 - RE: P2009453 RE: P2009453 BEI Adjustments Rdiustments Vivarium new . nev:I heating Observation Commissioning M. .. Commissioning M. .. 4b.. 42 5 :3 2523'?; Vivarium P2009453 RE: P2009453 RE: P2009453 Controls Vivarium Construction Mee. ..Construction Mee. ..Construction Mee. ..M0d . . 5 L- 3 $22412 P266945 RE: P2009453 Pw: BFO Re: P2009453 Fe: P2009453 RE: P2009453 Pw: P2009453 gag? HVAC Modi. .. Construction Mee. ..Con?rmation of B. . . Construction l'r?lee. . .Construction Mae? .Construction ?008.. .Construction Mere. .. 1.. . I - 3:54 0.5.0.5 RE: P2009453 RE: P2009453 RE: P2009453 RE: P2009453 RE: P2009453 P2009453 Re? Construction Mae. . .Construction Mes. .Construction Mee. . .Construction Mee. . .Construction Moe. . .Construction Vivarium .ibii3iijr-2' .3 I g, 52522301 .. U, ?swmatfon . Vivarium Scope Vivarium RE: Door Closer RE: Door Closer ?my: VivariL Filters - . . FW: Vivarium Door Closer Re: Vivarium RE: Vivarium RE: Vivar'um RE: Vivarium RE: Vivarium Project Project Project Project Project Project 252mm a .- - 1.: Ar" Fw: Iu'iuarium Cancelled: Re: Werium Vivarium Pr?ject .. P2009453 Vivarium 'u'iVerium "Reject 262a h- -- [S'gc? (b18242 Us 0_ 6 252mm -- - -- 262a'm'2- Prnje ct "f I. like?? . U. use? 2:32am; 2e2am: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: . I CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 3:59 PM To: Probst Paul E. . . .. - I can assist in assembling the information if you like. It could go out as a single document if everyone is in agreement. From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesda Deoember 29, 2010 2:28 PM To: E: 2523th Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocooiOSHE); (cociocooroSl-lls) gig-?ghter RE. . Vivarium 0k, we'll see what wecan do. Thanks, Paul 404?639-0505 [Ulla-'12 '5 C2 (cricioIorNcezIo) Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:25 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (coo/ocoorosaa); a I a EBZWEQ.RE. i'lvarlum I think there needs to be 1-) a simple statementfmemo from OSHE to the programs on their take @342 may .have a checklist from the ?nal walk through), 2) 3 RFC document simva outlining the testingperformed (Dec 23} and results (is the contractor providing some 7? and 3) there needs to be some documentation of the ?new? air flow in the area that can be presented to can provide a snapshot of numbers right before it is ready to be occupied}. If . involved, there might something else that the FLO would want. Need to discuss this, but i think these don?t need to be more than 1 page each. Keep it simple. (bli3l 2626f From: Probst, Paul E. cember 29, 2010 1:39 PM . Cc: Howard, William (Bill) 252-301:- What kind of ?report and associated documents" are we talking about? Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 . CDCIOIDINCEZID) Ser t: Wednesda December 29, 2010 8:44 AM (coqotomcxeo. - cocromchmo)(cocrommcezro); NCEZID): . o; ibii3i' (coo/otomcezm) 262at-cha' . Howard, William (Bill) (coczocoO/OSHE); Probst, Paul E. (cocxocooxero) ct - Vivarium All, of-the Bldivarium appears to have gone very well {Dec 28}, and I believe programs should expect a report and associated documents indicating this sometime in January. The return to service date ofJan 10 is still in effect, as there are a few things that need to be fixed and installed, followed by a final clean up by Goodwill. There is now a need for program operation protocols to be modi?ed to reflect changes in entering, reentering, exiting, etc. This will be a major agenda item for the Jan 13 HOG meeting. When ready, please send the ?les to DSHE and for review. Many thanks to all those who contributed to the looks very good and is a major improvement to the facility. uses Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:32 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDGIDCOOIBFO) Cc: Ling arthur Ft. (CDCIOCOOEFO) i . . - Jivanum KarenIArt: Copying you on an e-mail sent byto the programs he appears to be of the opinion of FMED and OSHE that the results show success. Karen - regarding items 2 and 3 below, will Air Analysis be turning over something we can share? Please call if necessary. Thanks. Paul 404-639-0505 to 133-42 so. 252m.- (CDCIDIDXNCEZID) Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:26 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) I ?3mg 6?1: RE: Fivariurn .. . Paul, I think there needs to be 1} a simple statement/memo from DSHE to the programs on their take may have a checklist from the ?nal walk through], 2] a BFD document simply outlining the testing performed (Dec 28) and results {is the contractor providing something?), and 3) there needs to be some documentation of the "new" air flow in the area that can be presented to DSAT (Roman can provide a snapshot of numbers right before it is readt,r to be occupied}. If ib?liE' is involved, there might something else that the R0 would want. Need to discuss this, but i think these 262 a I 't need to be more than 1 page each. Keep it simple. From: Probst, Paul E. - ember 29, 2010 1:39 PM . ?it - - ?2l32 ivarium ohm-+2 qsnarl-r What kind of ?report and associated documents? are we talking about? Thanks, Paul 404-639?0505 252mm From DINCEZID) Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 8:44 AM ?ll? {coctoxomctao (CDCJOIDIN ?so CDC/Olomcezm); fbii?i as. ibii3l?FWi?iEr?s, I CIOIDINCEZID) Ma,? was 51 Patrick Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) a {ova} ?lial: ?2528i?liie Vivarium appears to have gone very well (Dec 23], and I believe programs should expect a report and associated documents indicating this sometime in January. The return to service date ofJan 10 is still in effect, as there are a few things that need to be fixed and installed, followed by a final clean up by Goodwill. There is now a need for program operation protocols to be modi?ed to reflect changes in entering, reentering, exiting, etc. This will be a major agenda item for the Jan 13 HOG meeting. When ready, please send the files to OSHE and I for review. Many thanks to all those who contributed to the looks very good and is a major improvement to the facility. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E, Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:28 PM To: - CDCIOIDINCEZID) I tb)i3i4 833 0 H0 a William (Bill) . 'r ?2a2a 4g5: ward, . ll 0k, we'll see what we can do. Thanks. Paul 404-639-0505 From: mus: (coc,r0Iomcezro) Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:26 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (cocxocoorBFo) [MirFm (Bill) ivarium Paul, I think there needs to be 1] a simple statement/memo from OSHE to the programs on their take mapr have a checklist from the ?nal walk through], 2) a BFO document simva outlining the testing performed {Dec 28) and results [is the contractor providing something?), and 3) there needs to be some documentation of the ?new? air flow in the area that can be presented to DSAT [Roman can provide a snapshot of numbers right before it is ready to be occupied). If (biliilis involved, there might something else that the RD would want. Need to discuss this, but I think these 262st don?t need to be more than 1 page each. Keep it simple. - From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesda December 29, 2010 1:39 PM To: 3 4c :Howard,? ?Ham (Bill) (cocrocooromE) EjlectsuRE: -- Iivarium ?2523 I a What kind of "report and associated documents? are we talking about? Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 whet-12$? 2:32am} . 1 262 Patrick Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) - Jivarium 262 {biraiamusc c3 of'the appears to have gone very well (Dec 28}, and I believe programs should expect a report and associated - - uments indicating this sometime in January. The return to service date of Jan 10 is still in effect, as there are a few things that need to be ?xed and installed, followed by a ?nal clean up by Goodwill. There is now a need for program operation protocols to be modi?ed to re?ect changes in entering, reentering, exiting, etc. This will he a major agenda item for the Jan 13 HOG meeting. When readv, please send the files to OSHE and for review. Many thanks to all those who contributed to the looks very good and is a major improvement to the Mathe, Chester From: . . Sent: nesay, ecember 29, 2010 2:26 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) g3 Hov William (Biil) 2523' ?Eject; . ivarium Paul, . I think there needs to be 1) a simple statement/memo from OSHE to the programs on their take {Pat may have a checklist from the final walk through), 2) a BFO document simply outlining the testing performed {Dec 28] and results [is the contractor providing something?), and 3) there needs to be some documentation of the "new" air ?ow in the area that can be presented to DSAT (Roman can provide a snapshot of numbers right before it is read~,l to be occupied). If involved, there might something else that the HO would want. Need to discuss this, but I think these don?t need to be more than 1 page each. Keep it simple. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesda December 29, 2010 1:39 PM To: coconorNCEZIn) Cc: Howard, iam (Bill) Fi? Vivarium What kind of ?report and associated documents" are we talking about? Thanks, Paul 404-539-0505 mum/?Cami? From: 'bi'?i NCEZID) Wednesday, December 29, 2010 8: Ee??aim fgi?amhut ., ura. mus; . ?3 mire; mus: .. .. has ?nf?fiigE-B?ect: -- . vivarium 262arra~ All {bit-5i 4% 252a{ I sat?? Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. (CDQOCOOIBFO) ?sc. He.com-m-issioningftesting of'the Eldivarium appears to have gone very well (Dec 28], and I believe programs should expect a report and associated documents indicating this sometime in Januarv. The return to service date ofian 10 is still in effect, as there are a few things that need to be ?xed and installed, followed by a final clean up by Goodwill. There is now a need for program operation protocols to be modified to re?ect changes in entering, reentering, exiting, etc. This will be a major agenda item forthe Jan 13 HOG meeting. When ready, please send the ?les to OSHE and for review. Many thanks to all those who contributed to the looks very good and is a major improvement to the as v- [3:242 use. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Prob-st, Paul E. Sent: Wednesda December 29, 2010 1:39 PM To: [b13i142U-S-G-62623tm CDCIOIDINCEZID) miss) I. . mg. What kind of ?report and associated documents? are we talking about? Thanks. Paul 404-639-0505 U.S.C. E: 2B2a[h_! I Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 8:44 AM egg-333%? - I I [bll?t I USE ?it 2 CDCIOIDINCEZID) .. :vanum tbioi . . . . . ?252aithe Bid" ivarlum appears to have gone very well (Dec 23), and believe programs should expect a report and associated documents indicating this sometime in January. The return to service date ofJan 10 is still in effect, as there are a few things that need to be ?xed and installed, followed by a final clean up by Goodwill. There is now a need for program operation protocols to be modi?ed to re?ect changes in entering, reentering, exiting, etc. This will be a major agenda item for the Jan 13 HOG meeting. When ready, please send the ?les to OSHE and for review. Many thanks to all those who contributed to the looks very good and is a major improvement to the facility. ??"arl1' Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFD) Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 1:38 PM Nog WiIliam P. Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIOCOOIBFO) 252$?bjeet: .. FW: ivarium FYI Thanks, Paul [Dz-:13. 4 262allt?Jo 404-639-0505 From:' Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 B: -- - NCIRD - ,1 one . 2523111} ZEEaih ibliifl: I . Ef?- I Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE): Probst. Paul E. (CncrocoomFO) - - l?rivarium ?252s -- 262 SC. r?ivarium appears to have gone very well (Dec 23), and I believe programs should expect a reportand associated documents indicating this sometime in January. The return to service date ofJan 10 is still in effect, as there are a few things that need to be ?xed and installed, followed by a ?nal clean up by Goodwill. There is now a need for program operation protocols to be modi?ed to reflect changes in entering, reentering, exiting, etc. This will be a major agenda item for the Jan 13 HOG meeting. When ready, please send the ?les to OSHE and I for review. Many thanks to all those who contributed to the looks van,r good and is a major improvement to the facility. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: - Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 8:44; To: Zembuto, Laura R. (coercioiNCIRoi; -- (CbCiOiolNCEZio); muse I a . la -- liaise . ?31811.42 i 262aimcc'r" (coalocoolOSHE); Howard. William (Bill) Probst, -- IE. mum ?262amihe appears to have gone very well (Dec 28), and I believe programs should expect a report and associated documents indicating this sometime in January. The return to service date of Jan 10 is still in effect, as there are a few things that need to be fixed and installed, followed by a final clean up by Goodiuill. There is now a need for program operation protocols to be modified to reflect changes in entering, reentering, exiting, etc. This will be a major agenda item for the Jan 13 HOG meeting. When ready, please send the ?ies to OSHE and for review. Many thanks to all those who contributed to the looks very good and is a major improvement to the facilitv. U.S.C 2E2a?'l'i Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 3:51 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFOJ Subject: FW: P2009453 - Wall ?x FYI Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: amass-sac? Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: 770-433-255? From: Tyler, John Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 1:22 PM To: Lingier, Arthur R. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Subject: P2009453 - Wall ?x Art, To address the wall ?nish issue, as we discussed before, on the new masonry walls the contractor should smooth the face of the masonry to the greatest extent possible without scarifying the masonry. Over?grouting and other small particles should be removed by hand concrete smoothing stone. The contractor should prepare the masonryjoints by using a wire brush to pro?le the joint. The wall and joints should be cleaned and dust free. The joints should be ?lled with SherCrete Miraclebond 1350 epoxy ?ller according to the manufacturer?s written instructions (see enclosed PDF cut sheet). The epoxy ?ller is-to be tooled smooth and ?ush with the face of the masonry. Once the ?ller has been prepared and cured, the entire new walls are to be painted with the same SW epoxy paint as before. The finished wall is to have a similar appearance as the existing walls. If you have any questions please let me know. Thanks, John John Tyler, RA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 7?0 4188-8133 Phone Mobile. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Belflower, Craig Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 8:4? AM To: Probst, aul E. Subject: FW: "91' - -- Paul, This is the requested information concerning the location of the static pressure sensors for '1 . . ?r The sensor and the pickup point in the duct work lS located In room [Wag [Dita-'1 ?2 Ll '5 Ci :3 mac: 5 . E?zam- The sensor IS located In the control panel. The control panel ts located to the mechanical room on the The sensor is tapped into the static pressure pickup line from the ?ow station for ?gy; The ?ow station is located on the roof. mosh. I Please pass this information to after you have had a chance to review it. Thanks. Craig Belflower From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 2:54 PM To: Bel?ower, Craig Cc: Walpole, Kenneth K. .42 2623rll'lt Craig, Test and Balance can?t seem to find the static pressure sensor for ?at-452 Do you know where it is located? Also they can?t locate a static pressure sensor for 'Di'Ei??E?lg "which makes us wonder if the air flow measuring station is measuring static for that system? Thanks, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1800 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 776?483-3307? Cell: 404-3254532? Fax; rro-saa?zss? email: KMossi coca, ov Maths, Chester From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 21,2010 2:09 PM To: Howard. William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: FW: P2009453 - Observation Report fyi Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Tyler, John Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 7:55 AM I To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: P2009453 - Observation Report Paul. We did notice this late last week. Our drawings do require the walls to be parged, prep'd and ?nished to match existing. Art looked at them with Bill Howard and identi?ed several areas that Willis is going to do over. I am not sure of the timeframe when they are going to do it. John From: Probst, Paul E. To: Lingler, Arthur R. Tyler, John Sent: Thu Dec 16 13:44:21 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 - Observation Report Art?ohn: When doing a walk thru earlier this week, I noted that the finish on the new CMU walls was rough relative to the existing. I am not sure what was speci?ed ?to match existing or not. The original walls were built similar to upstairs where we use gaseous decons, and this area is subject to liquid washdown, so matching is not necessarin required; however, it seems that little effort was made to grind stubble off the CMU prior to painting. Do we have recourse to get this addressed? Paul From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCDOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:02 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: FW: P2009453 - Observation Report FYI From: Tyler, John (CDCKOCOOIBFO) 1.: 6; Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:00 PM To: Lingier, Arthur R. Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 - Observation Report Art, I went to the job site this morning to check out the construction progress. Please find the enclosed PDF of my comments from that observation. vaou have any questions let me know. Thank; John ?Report of John Tyler. RA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce (770)488-8133 Phone Mobile 't ler cdo. ov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Tyler, John (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 7:55 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 Observation Report Paul, We did notice this late last week. Our drawings do require the walls to be parged, prep'd and finished to match existing. Art looked at them with Bill Howard and identi?ed several areas that Willis is going to do over. I am not sure of the timeframe when they are going to do it. John From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) To: Lingler, Arthur R. Tyler, John (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thu Dec 16 13:44:21 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 - Observation Report Art/John: When doing a walk thru earlier this week, I noted that the finish on the new CMU walls was rough relative to the existing. I am not sure what was specified Hto match existing or not. The original walls were built similar to upstairs where we use gaseous decons, and this area is subject to liquid washdown, so matching is not necessarily required; however, it seems that little effort was made to grind stubble offthe CMU prior to painting. Do we have recourse to get this addressed? Paul From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:02 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: FW: P2009453 - Observation Report FYI From: Tyler, John (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:00 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCKOCOOJBFO) Subject: P2009453 - Observation Rebort Art, I went to the job site this morning to check out the construction progress. Please find the enclosed PDF of my comments from that observation. If you have any questions let me know. Thanks, John ?Report of Obsewatien_121410.pdfb> John Tyler. RA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce (HOMES-8133 Phone Imus} Mobile igglerQCdegev Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) i Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 1:44 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Tyler, John Subject: FW: P2009453 - Observation Report Art/John: When doing a walk thru earlier this week, I noted that the ?nish on the new CMU walls was rough relative to the existing. I am not sure what was specified to match existing or not. The original walls were built similar to upstairs where we use gaseous decons, and this area is subject to liquid washdown, so matching is not necessarily required; however, it seems that little effort was made to grind stubble off the EMU prior to painting. Do we have recourse to get this addressed? Paul From: Moss, Karen (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:02 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: FW: P2009453 - Observation Report FYI From: Tyler, John (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:00 PM To: Lingler, Arthur Ft. Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODIBFO) Subject: P2009453 - Observation Report Art, I went to the job site this morning to check out the construction progress. Please find the enclosed PDF of my comments from that observation. lfyou have any questions let me know. Thanks, John Report of John Tyler, RA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce I I 770 488-8133 Phone Mobile 121'1 42010 42 Li P2009453 HVAC Mud Report of Observation Date of Observation: 1214/2010. 10:00am. :12 US Cl. 252mb Location: Hoybal Campus, In Attendance: John Tyler Prepared by: John Tyler A construction site observation of the above referenced project took place at the above referenced time and location. The following architectural items were noted: 1. The new stainless steel window screens are installed. 2. The new door operator is installed. 3. The new metal wall guards are installed. The following installed architectural items may require further attention by the Contractor: 1. There are a few metal wall guard brackets which are installed over a masonry mortar joint such that the struck joint results in a small gap between the wail and the bracket. The brackets need to be sealed at the wall to a weathertight condition. 2. After final installation and adjustment of the door operator, the operator cover needs to be sealed. End of Fleporl. Mathe, Chester (encrocoomsee) i From: Phillipa, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) i Sent: Thursday. December 161 2010 1:3? PM I To: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Subject: RE: Vivarium Testing 1 will be onsite all day Tuesday, just have them contact me when they are ready. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, December 161r 2010 1:33 PM To: Phillips, Roman (CTR) Subject: Vivarium Testing Roman: A preliminary test of the new Vivarium setup will be conducted next Tuesday morning, Dec. 21. Will involve failing exhaust fans. Probably need FSE on hand. i Paul Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Prohat, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, December 16. 2010 1:33 PM To: Phillipa, Roman (CTR) Subject: Vivarium Testing Roman: A preliminary test of the new Vivarium setup will be conducted next Tuesday morning, Dec. 21. Will involve failing exhaust fans. Probava need FSE on hand. Paul Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOJBFO) (CTR) Sent: Wednesday. December '15, 2010 2:31 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Subject: RE: Door Closer Adjustments 0k From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:20 PM To: Phillips, Roman (CDCIDCDOJBFD) (CTR) Subject: FW: Door Closer Adjustments Roman; Need for you to assist on this. All direction would be provided by and El company. Please advise. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 10:09 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoorBFO) Cc: Phillips, Roman Nogueira, William P. Subject: Door Closer Adjustments Paul, TAB is readv for FSE to adjust the door closers based on revised airflow. Thanks, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-488-2330? Cell: 404-325-6327 Fax: 700?438-200? email: KMoss @ede.gov Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 10:09 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOWBFO) Cc: Phillips. Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Nogueira, William P. Subject: Door Closer Adjustments Paul, TAB is ready for FSE to adjust the door closers based on revised airflow. Thanks, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-525-632? Fax: email: rain-dc gov From: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 14. 2010 3:11 PM mm - 5 Moss, - - (CDCIOCOOJBFO) ?725: legit; . Vivarium new heating cons piping Maths. Chester (cosiocoorosem Appreciate the clarification. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:0? PM To: Proust, Paul E. Cc: Phillips, Roman (CDCJUCDOIBFO) Nogueir?a,r William P. ?pt:..0id Ivarium new heatin coils i in 9 9 ?262aihl Paul. I specified manual airvents at the high points with the pipe sloping down to the coils to prevent entrainment of air. Willis Mechanical installed the pipe opposite of their instruction and piped up to the coils. The air vents that are actually installed are automatic with the valve shut off to he a manual operation. Four Season could open the vent to make it an automatic operation to ensure air is vented off the system. Thanks, Karen Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday. December 14, 2010 3:0? PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) ?niteness Phil Roman (CDCIOCUOIBFO) Nogueira. William P. Paul, I speci?ed manual air vents at the high points with the pipe sloping down to the coils to prevent entrainment of air. Willis Mechanical installed the pipe opposite of their instruction and piped up to the coils. The air vents that are actually installed are automatic with the valve shut off to be a manual operation. Four Season could open the vent to make it an automatic operation to ensure air is vented off the system. Thanks, Karen Mathe, Chester (cocrocoorosem From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 14. 2010 3:02 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Subject: FW: P2009453 Observation Report FYI From: Tyler, John Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:00 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: P2009453 Observation Report Art, I went to the job site this morning to check out the construction progress. Please find the enclosed PDF of my comments from that observation. If you have any questions let me know. Thanks, John Report of Observation; 21 .. . John Tyler. RA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce WU 488-8133 Phone . Mobile ler cdc. ov 131M201 0 tb:t3}:42 use. a P2009453 HVAG Modl Report of Obsewatr?on Date of Observation: 1314x2010. 10:00am. Location: Honal Campus. ruler? 3? 5? 2623'? In Attendance: John Tyler Prepared by: John Tyler A construction site observation of the above referenced project took place at the above referenced time and location. The following architectural items were noted: 1. The new stainless steel window screens are installed. 2. The new door operator is installed. 3. The new metal wall guards are installed. The following installed architectural items may require further attention by the Contractor: 1. There are a few metal wall guard brackets which are installed over a masonry mortar joint such that the struck joint results in a small gap between the wall and the bracket. The brackets need to be sealed at the wall to a weathenight condition. 2. After final installation and adjustment of the door operator, the operator cover needs to be sealed. End of Report. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 10:53 AM To: Howard William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) Cc: a CDCIOCOOIOSHE): Prohst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) 'j Subject: RE: P2009453 Commissioning Meeting Just call my of?ce then at 8:00 am. Thanks, Karen Mass P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ICell: 404-025-602? Fax: email: ?01055 1 [nacdcrov From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCKOCOOIDSHE) Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 9:29 AM To: Moss Karen CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: me Probst, Paul E. ?Ll-5'3 @3593!? Subject: RE: P2009453 Commissioning Meeting Karen, We were all thinking that we would get together in a conference room and call into you to save the trip and time. Let me know if that will work for you. ENV has started the BSC certi?cation process. They should ?nish tomorrow. The onlyr thing left will be the HEPA housings and ?lters on the mechanical ?oor. We'll start those upon your approval. The window screens look good, they will do the job. Elmo I adjusted the telltale?s this am. William Howard Acting BiosafetvaaciIitv Team Leader Office of Safety, Health and Environment (OSHE) 404.639.2174 673.614.?257 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 8:4? AM To: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCJOCOOIOSHE) Subject: RE: P2009453 Commissioning Meeting You can?t make it over? Are you off this week? Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 D?ice: Cell: 4114-3254532? Fax: ?ll-433.265? email: KMosglfa-?lggc ggy Appointment-nu From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 12:54 PM To: Moss, Karen Subject: Accepted: P2009453 Commissioning Meeting When: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 8:00 AM Eastern Time (US 3t Canada). Where: Williams Building Room 2603 Karen, Will you have a call in number? Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOJOSEH From: Howard, William {Bill} Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 9:29 AM - To: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Go: ?$1359.. 12?s.. Probst, Paul E. 2523.?. beesmcocrommcezm) Subject: RE: P2009453 Commissioning Meeting Karen, We were all thinking that we would get together in a conference room and call into you to save the trip and time. Let me know if that will work for you. has started the BSC certi?cation process. They should ?nish tomorrow. The only thing left will be the HEPA housings and ?lters on the mecha floor. We?ll start those upon your approval. The window screens look good, they will do the job. and I adjusted the telltale?s this am. William Howard Acting Biosafety/Facility Team Leader Office ofSafety, Health and Environment (OSHE) ?104.639.21?4 98.614325? From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCODKBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 8:4? AM To: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: RE: P2009453 Commissioning Meeting You can?t make it over? Are you off this week? Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M3 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: noses-sac? Cell: 404-325-682? Fax: ??0-433-255? email: KMosleodegov From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 12:54 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: Accepted: P2009453 Commissioning Meeting When: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 8:00 Mid-9:30 AM Eastern Tlan (US Canada). Where: Williams Building Room 2603 Karen, Will you have a call in number? [Bugging-2 c. Thesup ply grille serving the overall-suite; Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday. December 10, 2010 9:53 AM To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Bel?ower, Craig Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR): Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: Vivarium Area Controls Karenl'Art: Following up on our meeting from Wednesday, it my understanding that all physical ?eld work has been performed by JCI, and that they are lacking Graphics on the workstation as well as the submittals you are looking for. I assume the submittals will become their as-builts. til-[3442 .E C3 52understanding for balancing purposes that the related exhaust valves simply disconnected from pneumatics and set in a ?xed - functioned in three position mode depending on the above Regarding the change to the positivefnegative isolation rooms I listed rooms, and it now needs to be ?xed position. For proper decommissioning, we need for JCI to make the necessary programming adjustments to the BAS reflecting changes to the suite, re?ect the changes on as-bunt documentation. and make the physical ?eld change of removing the key switches andior putting a stainless steel cover plate to ?t into the existing hole of the Wall key control. Concerning our time constraints, only the cover plate is necessary before re-occupancy. Please copy,?r Craig and Ken on any correspondence related to this matter. And, in general. regarding frustration with JCI. just like any other sub, no payment will get their attention. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Din. Operations BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Office 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-235-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCJOCOOIOSEP) [blli31242 USE. 2525mm:- Wednesday. December {31, 2010 2:36 BM Zambuto, Laura R. Damon. Inger K. .. wuuwumu HDH we ItlliE': Posegj James E. From: Sent: 0; .12 2623m- rblt3l: l2 SUE mag (CDCIOCOOJOSHE Howard, William (Bill) Williams. Allison Bird. Brian (000iolorN0E2Io); rblolclzuscs .. Mimosa: Lingler, Arthur R. (cocrocooraFol; Probst, Paul E. (cocrocooreFo); Walpole. Kenneth K. (00010000 Allg?igga tour and meeting afterwards (to discuss changes to procedures}, i am providing a PDF attachment (as a reference for the major changes to the vivarium) and the following discussion points: 1 Construction to redirect air flow into the animal room (from what was once the will req uiceshgei??gslis [3'5 to program operating procedures . 2 When exiting animal room into the common anteroom, decontamination and disposal of PPE (Twek, outer foot covers, and outer gloves} will take place at the exit. 3 - PAPR will also be sprayed down with decontamination solution prior to exiting. 4 PAPR can be removed once inside the common anteroom orat the entrance to the dressing rooms. 5 -At the entrance to the dressing room, PAPR, inner gloves, and inner foot covers will he spray decontaminated and discarded in the trash bin-prior to entering into the room leading to the showers/change area. There was discussion of re-entry into rooms and the following was touched on 1 Program will decide how re?entrv takes lace gist-i? could take pla0e lav donning new Tvvek, gloves, and foot cover {without changing clothing; PPE could be stored in the common anteroom} 3 If re?entrv is to take place into an unassociated room, it requires a change of clothing 4 ?The idea that ARB staff could enter and exit the rooms exclusively through the common anteroom was entertained 5 Alternatives to the current space?usage model were discussed Construction appears .to he progressing smoothly and will begin soon. For those of you who attended the tour and meeting, please provide clari?cationfcorrections to the above points, as well as any-comments you would like to make regarding the discussions. Page 2682 USE. 252mm Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 3:1? PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) . Subject: FW: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11l1512010 Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOXBFD) Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 3:06 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCXOCDOIBFO) Cc: Phillips, Roman (CTR) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11f15f2010 It is ready to has problems, let us Paul N. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 2:40 PM To: Nogueira, William P. Subject: IRE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11f1512010 Paul: Do you know status ofihis? Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Nogueira, William P. (COGOCOOXBFO) Sent: Wednesday, November 2010 6:34 PM To: Moss, Karen Phillips, Roman (CDCKOCOOJBFO) (CT Bel?eld, Emanuel Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11f1512010 You are welcome Roman's and his crew are always on top of things Paul Sent from my BlaokBerry Wireless Device From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDDIBFO) To: Phillips, Roman Nogueira, William P. Bel?eld, Emanuel (coo/ocooiBFO) (CTR) Sent: Wed Nov 17 18:18:12 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on Thank voul From: Phillips, Roman (CTR) Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 10:51 AM To: Nogueira, William P. Belfield, Emanuel (CTR) Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFD) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 1111512010 All PM's will be complete by 11122 From: Nogueira, William P. Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 10:45 AM . To: Phillips, Roman Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCIDCDDIBFO) (CTR) Subject: Fw: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11! 1512010 Guys is this on you re scheduIe Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device From: Moss, Karen To: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Wed Nov 17 08:33:46 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11; 152010 Paul, This is the TAB request sent earlier about maintenance: [would like to con?rm that the AHUs involved are being serviced (coils and compartments cleaned. belts changed, bearings greased, complete new set of filters installed etc) and also the exhaust fan systems (new belts, bearing checked and greased etc) Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce; 7'70?433?330? Cell: 404-325-682? Fax: email: KMoss 1 @cdc.gov From: Nogueira, William P. Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 5:42 PM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11.9?15f2010 Karen, Can?t help with items 1 or 2. What needs to be verified regarding maintenance work on AHU and item 3? Item 4 is being handled through Jerry (contractor) and lam not aware of any more tours in the vivarium since last week? Art has been working with contractors and ARB personnel each day. Paul N. From: Mossr Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOXBFO Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11f15f2010 A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FMEO 1. JG still does not have an approved sensor, the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delay. 2. Need flags (tape) for Test and Balance to be up by 3. Verify that the maintenance work on AHU and requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 11:129. 4. WMI needs to turn of fire detectors for soldering of pipe assume this has already been coordinated). Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta Georgia 30333 Of?ce: TTO-433-B30T Cell: 404?325?532? Fax: ??0?483?256? email: From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:0? PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting Notes Tanya and Charles, The highlights ofthe meeting are as follows: 1. The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11/18 and will be installed 11f19. 2. JCI needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor. The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 11,124. 4. The wall guards have just been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wall location. However, installation can finish up during TAB work. 5. The new door arrives ll?lgf. 6. Control valves will be onsite on 11,117. 7. The new walls are up and GFR is waiting to paint them until the mortar has dried. Painting can be finished during TAB work. 8. Controller for the reheat coils is on back order but will not delay the project. 9. Flooring installation will smell; notify ARB of when the work is to be done. 10. Piping installation started on 11/15. 11. Bubble tight dampers are installed. . 12. New balancing dampers are installed. 13. WMI to check on when the new laminated glass for the new wall is to be installed. JCI and G-FR did not attend the meeting. The only concern I have at this point is Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Cell; 404-825-682? Fax: email: Khioss 1 @cdc. gov . Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEPJ From: Nogueira. William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 3:06 PM To: Probst. Paul E. Co: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFD) (CTR) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 111159010 It is ready to has problems, let us Paul N. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 2:40 PM To: Nogueira, William P. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11f15f2010 Paul: Do you know status of this? Then ks. Paul 404-639-0505 From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIDCODXBFO) Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 6:34 PM To: Moss, Karen Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR): Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 1111512010 You are welcome Roman?s and his crew are always on top of things Paul Sent from my BlackEierry Wireless Device From: Moss, Karen To: Phillips, Roman (CTR): Nogueira, William P. Bel?elcl, Emanuel (cm) Sent: Wed Nov 17 18:18:12 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11115f2010 Thank you! From: Phillips, Roman (CTR) Sent: Wednesday, November 2010 10:51 AM To: Nogueira, William P. Bei?eid, Emanuel (CTR) Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/15f2010 All PM's will be complete by 11122 From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCDOXBFO) Sent: Wednesday, November 2010 10:45 AM To: Phillips, Roman (CT Bel?eld, Emanuel (CTR) Subject: Fw: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/15/2010 Guys is this on you re schedule Sent from my BlaoltBerry Wireless Device From: Moss, Karen To: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOXBFD) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Wed Nov 1? 08:33:46 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/15!2010 Paul, This is the TAB request sent earlier about maintenance: i would like to confirm that the AHUs involved are being serviced (coils and compartments cleaned, belts changed, bearings greased, complete new set of filters installed etc) and also the exhaust fan systems (new belts, bearing checked and greased etc) Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770?433-3307 Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: Will-4332667" email: KMossl @cdcgov From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 5:42 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOXBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11! 15/2010 Karen, Can?t help with items 1 or 2. What needs to be verified regarding maintenance work on AHU and item 3? Item 4 is being handled through Jerry (contractor) and I am not aware of any more tours in the vivarium since last week? Art has been working with contractors and ARB personnel each day. Paul N. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, P. Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11f15f2010 A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FMED 1. JCI still does not have an approved sensor, the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delay. 2. Need flags (tape) for Test and Balance to be up by 11/28/2010. 3. Verify that the maintenance work on AHU and requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 11/29. 4. WMI needs to turn of fire detectors for soldering of pipe (I assume this has already been coordinated]. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 220-483?330? Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: em ail: KMossi @cdegov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:07 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: P2009453 11f13/2010 Construction Meeting Notes Tanya and Charles, The highlights ofthe meeting are as follows: 1. The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11/13 and will be installed 11/19. 3 2. JCI needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor. 3. The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 11f24. 4. The wall guards have just been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wall location. However, installation can finish up during TAB work. 5. The new door arrives 11/19/. 6. Control valves will be onsite on 11/17. 7. The new walls are up and GFR is waiting to paint them until the mortar has dried. Painting can be finished during TAB work. 8. Controller for the reheat coils is on back order but will not delay the project. 9. Flooring installation will smell; notify ARB of when the work is to be done. 10. Piping installation started on 11115. 11. Bubble tight dampers are installed. 12. New balancing dampers are installed. 13. WMI to check on when the new laminated glass for the new wall is to be installed. JCI and GFR did not attend the meeting. The only concern I have at this point is .iCl. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Attanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ??D~488~83?i7 Ce": 454-325?5527 Fax: email: Klv?lossliijodogov Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E, (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 2:40 PM To: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 1111512010 Paul: Do you know status of this? Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, November 2010 6:34 PM To: Moss, Karen Phillips, Roman Belfield, Emanuel (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/15f2010 You are welcome Romans and his crew are always on top of things Paul Sent from my BlaokBerry Wireless Device From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFD) To: Phillips, Roman (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Nogueira, William P. Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCXOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Sent: Wed Nov 1? 18:18:12 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on Thank you! From: Phillips, Roman (coo/ocoorsFO) (CTR) Sent: Wednesday, November 2010 10:51 AM To: Noguelra, William P. Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCKOCDOJBFD) (CTR) Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11f15f2010 All Plvl?s will be complete by 1122 From: Nogueira, William P. Sent: Wednesday, November 17', 2010 10:45 AM To: Phillips, Roman Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCKOCDOIBFO) (CTR) Subject: Fw: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 15/2010 Guys is this on you re schedule Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOJBFO) To: Nogueira, William P. Cc: Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wed Nov 17 08:33:46 2010 I Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/15f2010 Paul, This is the TAB request sent earlier about maintenance: i would like to confirm that the AHUs involved are being serviced (coils and compartments cleaned. belts changed, bearings greased. complete new set of ?lters installed etc) and also the exhaust fan systems (new belts; bearing checked and greased etc) Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. N18 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 4o4azs-eaer Fax: email: KMossl?cdcgov From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 5:42 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCXOCOOIBFD) Cc: Prob-st, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11115f2010 Karen, Can?t help with items 1 or 2. What needs to be veri?ed regarding maintenance work on AHU and item 3? Item 4 is being handled through Jerry (contractor) and lam not aware of any more tours in the vivarium since last week? Art has been working with contractors and ARE personnel each day. Paul N. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/152010 A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FMEO 1. it] still does not have an approved sensor, the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delay. 2. Need flags (tape) for Test and Balance to be up by 11f28/2010. 3. Verify that the maintenance work on AHU and requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 11129. 4. WMI needs to turn of fire detectors for soldering of pipe (I assume this has already been coordinated}. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1000 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce; 770048 0-3307 Call: 40443254502? Fax: Tim-403256? email: moss I @cdc.gov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:07 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: P2009453 11/139010 Construction Meeting Notes Tanya and Charles, The highlights of the meeting are as follows: 1. The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11/18 and will be installed 11/19. 2. JCI needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor. 3. The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 11/24. 4. The wall guards have just been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wall location. However, installation can finish up during TAB work. 5. The new door arrives 11/19]. 6. Control values will be onsite on 11/17. 7. The new walls are up and GFR is waiting to paint them until the mortar has dried. Painting can be ?nished during TAB work. 8. Controller for the reheat coils is on back order but will not delay the project. 9. Flooring installation will smell; notify ARB ofwhen the work is to be done. 10. Piping installation started on 11f15. 11. Bubble tight dampers are installed. 12. New balancing dampers are installed. 13. WMI to check on when the new laminated glass for the new wall is to be installed. JCI and GFR did not attend the meeting. The only concern I have at this point is Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-682? Fax: Email: KMossl@cdc.gov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Moss, Karen I Sent: Tuesday, November 23. 2010 10:03 AM . Pussy, James E. Probst, Paul E.. (encrocomsFO);Ty1er, John (cocrocoorsFoi; Lingler, Arthur R. (cosiocomeFoi; rn (Bill) Blanchard. Thomas M. m: .CDCIOIDINCEZID "82.00943 HVAC Mod Construction Meeting Minutes All, Attached are revised meeting notes from our meeting on 11/17f2010 based on input from OSHE and FMEO, :12 I Estes-2 -- 252301. I Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton 'Road MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404?325-6552? Fax: emailzm p.11 ?31, 'i'o a; ItE-ltn,? . .. HEALTHIEH 1. I MEETING MINUTES Center for Disease Control and Prevention Date: November 23, 2010 1.0181243 LLELC. Subject: P2009453 Locati?n: I Attendees: Karen Moss - DEMOKB F0 .. .. . . Paul Probst FMEOJBFO James Fecey Bill Howard OHSE John Tyler DEMOIBFO Torn Blanchard ODIBFO Art Lingler CHVIOIBFO The purpose of this meeting was to update the programs on the progress of the above referenced project. Discussion: The current construction schedule was distributed to attendees. The new walls are up and need to be painted once the mortar has dried. The new glass with slots have been ordered and have yet to be installed. New floorin installation to take place on 110812010. The new door should arrive on 11! 1912010. Painting of ceiling and door frame to be done on Ilil 8! and Ililgf 2010. Holes in the slab has been cut. Duetwork and piping is being installed. . New backdraft dampers are installed. 10. New motorized dampers to be installed on 111' 19112010. 11. New access door to be installed on 11:22:12,010. 12. HI needs to resubmit the sensor. There is a three week lead time on the sensor. 13. OHSE to schedule filter decon with TAB contractor through Karen Moss. 14. Tours of the facility during construction and TAB to be schedule through BFO. 15. OHS to perform smoke test after TAB contractor ?nishes on lf8f2011. 115. Ping pong balls need to be removed before TAB. Ping pong balls to be given to Roman Phillips. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFOJ Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 9:03 AM Moss, Karl-ant I I EFO) a 25.23?: li?iect: HVAC Modi?cation onstm_c?annupdat_e USL- 9 Meeting Minutes Karen; Please strike Item #16 from the minutes. Neither Bill Howard, DSHE, or myself, have received requirements from DSAT as to requirements for re?occupancy. A request for same is on record. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOKBFO) Sent: Monda November 22, 2010 2:14 PM Posey, James E. Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. Tyler John CDC Lingier, Arthur R. Blanchard, Thomas M. g?ll-lifter: Moss, Karen (CD F0) it??anr sd?iemezooeasa- --H?VAG--Modi?cation Construction Update Meeting Minutes Attached is the notes from our last meeting. Please advise if any additions or corrections need to be made. you, . VAC Moi: Meeting Minutes 11_17_2010.pdf Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 7T0?483-330i' Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: 770-488-2657 email: Wag Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monda Novem per 22, 2010 2:14 PM Howard William (Bill) Probst. Paul E. Tyler. John Linler Arthur R. Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOIDINCEZID) ?Cc; Moss, Kar I ll II I .42USC $52331: HVAC Modi?cation -- Minutes Attached is the notes from our last meeting. Please advise if any additions or corrections need to be made. Thank you, was miter-r4? Failed: 2628th Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K87 Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 4G4-325-6527 Fax: email: KMosslt?'icdcgov SEKWC dict.? 35.l'J' . can: 'e pm 2? J- MEETING nurtures Center for Disease Control and Prevention Date: November 22, 2010 Subject: P2009453 HVAC Modi?cationl i Ilocatinn: Ilhlt3?l'42 US '3 E4262alh" I Attendees: Karen Moss DEMOIBFO NORD- Paul Probst James Pusey Bill Howard OHSE Tom Blanchard John Tyler DEMOIBFO Art Lingler CIMOIBFO The purpose of this meeting was to-update the programs on the progress of the above referenced project. Discussion: The current construction schedule was distributed to attendees. The new walls are up and need to be painted once the mortar has dried. The new glass with slots have been ordered and have yet to be in stalled. New ?ooring installation to take place on 111182010. The new door should arrive on 1110912010. Painting of ceiling and door frame to be done on 11x13! and 11119! 2010. Holes in the slab has been cut. .Ductwork and piping is being installed. . New backdraft dampers are installed. 10. New motorized dampers to he installed on 11(191?2010. 11. New access door to he installed on 1112212010. 12. CI needs to resubmit the sensor. There is a three week lead time on the sensor. 13. OHSE to schedule ?lter dccon with TAB contractor through Karen Moss. 14. Tours of the facility during construction and TAB to be schedule through BFO. 15. OHS to perform-smoke test after TAB contractor ?nishes on 11812011. 16. Select Agent require a power failure test. will cut power to the building to perform power failure test with the TAB contractor. OHSE to be on site. 17. Ping pong balls need to be removed before-TAB. Ping pong balls to be given to Roman Phillips. Mathe, Chester From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 8:49 AM To: Nogueira. William P. Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Bel?eldy Emanuel (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Probst. Paul E. Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 1111512010 Yes, he is and so are you. Thanks so much with all your help with the contractors. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: it'll-4336307 Cell: 404-325-6827 Fax: email: gov From: Nogueira, William P. Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 6:34 PM To: Moss, Karen Phillipsr Roman (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Eielfield,r Emanuel Probst, Paul E. (CDCXOCOOXBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11115;?2010 You are welcome Roman?s and his crew are always on top of things Paul Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device From: Moss, Karen To: Phillips, Roman Nogueira, William Bel?eld, Emanuel (CTR) Sent: Wed Nov 1? 18:18:12 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/15/2010 Thank you! From: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 10:51 AM To: Nogueira, William P. Bel?eld, Emanuel (CTR) Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11}r 151'2010 All will be complete by 11(22 From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 10:45 AM To: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCODIBFD) Bei?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Subject: Fw: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/15/2010 Guys is this on you re schedule Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFD) To: Nogueira, William P. Cc: Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCJOCOCKBFO) Sent: Wed Nov 17 08:33:46 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11;15{2010 Paul, This is the TAB request sent earlier about maintenance: i would like to con?rm that the AHUs involved are being serviced (coils and compartments cleaned, belts changed, bearings greased, complete new set of filters installed etc) and also the exhaust fan systems (new belts, bearing checked and greased etc) Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: rroassescr Cell: 404.325.5232? Fax: noses-2657 email: From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCDCUBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 5:42 PM To: M055, Karen Cc: Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIDCOOIBFD) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/1512010 Karen, Can?t help with items 1 or 2. What needs to be veri?ed regarding maintenance work on AHU and EF's item 3? Item 4 is being handled through Jerry (contractor) and 2 lam not aware of any more tours in the vivarium since last week? Art has been working with contractors and ARB personnel each day. Paul N. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11115;?2010 A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FMED 1. JCI still does not have an approved sensor, the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delay. 2. Need flags (tape) for Test and Balance to be up by 11/28/2010. 3. Verify that the maintenance work on AHU and requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 11f29. 4. WMI needs to turn of fire detectors for soldering of pipe assume this has already been coordinated}. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1800 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-632? Fax: email: From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:0? PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: 02009453 11/13/2010 Construction Meeting Notes Tanya and Charles, The highlights of the meeting are as follows: 1. The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11f18 and will be installed 11/19. 2. JCI needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor. 3. The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 11,124. 3 4. The wall guards have just been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wall location. However, installation can ?nish up during TAB work. 5. The new door arrives 11/19}. 5. Control valves will be onsite on 11/127. The new walls are up and GFR is waiting to paint them until the mortar has dried. Painting can be finished during TAB work. - 8. Controller for the reheat coils is on back order but will not delay the project. 9. Flooring installation will smell; notify ARE ofwhen the work is to be done. 10. Piping installation started on 11f15. 11. Bubble tight dampers are installed. 12. New balancing dampers are installed. 13. to check on when the new laminated glass for the new wall is to be installed. MCI and GFR did not attend the meeting. The only concern I have at this point is JCI. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404425-632? Fax: email: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCODIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 7':31 AM To: Howard, William (Bill) (CD (cocrocoormHE) Subject: FW: BFO Con?rmation of ivarium Occupancy Date Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 1:07 PM To: Sanchez, Anthony Cox, Nancy Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOXOSHE) Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Moss, Karen Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Tanya A. Bowen, Ken L. Subject: BFO Con?rmation ofivarium Occupancy Date Friends: At the 2 NOV. meeting. i said that BFO would con?rm a occupancy target date for the vivarium of4 JAN 2011. Based on the ?nai scope of work and several meetings with the Contractor over the past few days, the revised occupancy target date for the vivarium is 10 JAN 2011. BFO will try and beat that date as we rough the project if at all possible. I hope that this revised target date is still acceptable to Special Pathogens and OSHE. Thanks for your continued support on this project! GI- Mathe, Chester From: Nogueira, William P. Sent: Wednesday. Nove'mbEr 2010 6:34 PM To: Moss, Karen (cocrocoorBFo); Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Probet, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 1111512010 You are welcome Romans and his crew are always On top of things Paul Sent from my BlackBeri-y Wireless Device From: Moss,r Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CT R): Nogueira, William P. Bel?elcl, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOXBFO) (CTR) Sent: Wed Nov 1? 18:18:12 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/15/2010 Thank you! From: Phillips, Roman (CTR) Sent: Wednesday, November 17,. 2010 10:51 AM To: Nogueira, William P. Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 111'1512010 All will be complete by 11122 From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFQ) Sent: Wednesday, November 2010 10:45 AM To: Phillips, Roman (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDQOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Subject: Fw: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 1111512010 Guys is this on you re schedule Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device From: Moss, Karen To: Nogueira, William P. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Wed Nov 17 08:33:46 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11f15f2010 Paul, This is the TAB request sent earlier about maintenance: 1 i would like to con?rm that the AHUs involved are being serviced (coils and compartments cleaned, belts changed, bearings greased, complete new set of ?lters installed etc) and also the exhaust fan systems (new belts, bearing checked and greased etc) Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 case: noses-ass? Cell: 404?825?5327 Fax: ?ND?438r2t33? em ai I: Kit-toss 1 @cdc. gov From: Nogueira, William P. Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 5:42 PM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/159010 Karen, Can?t help with items 1 or 2. What needs to be verified regarding maintenance work on AHU and item 3? Item 4 is being handled through Jerry (contractor) and lam not aware of any more tours in the vivarium since last week? Art has been working with contractors and ARES personnel each day. Paul N. From: Moss, Karen Slant: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting on A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FMEO 1. JG stiil does not have an approved sensor, the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delay. 2. Need flags (tape) for Test and Balance to be up by 11f28/2010. 3. Verifyr that the maintenance work on AHU and requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 11/29. 4. WMI needs to turn of fire detectors for soldering of pipe (I assume this has already been coordinated). Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technicai Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 D?ioe: 770-488-830? Cell: 404-825-632? Fax: 71'0-483-266? email: KMoss @cdc.gav From: Moss: Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Tuesday, November 1-5, 2010 4:0? PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCKOCOOXBFO) Subject: P2009453 1111322010 Construction Meeting Notes Tanva and Charles, The highlights of the meeting are as follows: 1. The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11/18 and will be installed 111/19. 2. JCJ needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor. i? The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 11f24. 4. The wall guards have just been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wall location. However, installation can ?nish up during TAB work. 5. The new door arrives 11/19/. 6. Control valves will be onsite on 11/17. 7. The new walls are Up and GFR is waiting to paint them until the mortar has dried. Painting can he finished during TAB work. 8. Controller for the reheat coils is on back order but will not delay the project. 9. Flooring installation will smell; notify ARB ofwhen the work is to be done. 10. Piping installation started on 11/15. 11. Bubble tight dampers are installed. 12. New balancing dampers are installed. 13. to check on when the new laminated glass for the new wall is to be installed. .ICI and GFR did not attend the meeting. The only concern I have at this point is JCI. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 4041?8254332? Fax: ?aws-266? email: Kiwi-ass @-odc.gov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Wednesday, November 17. 2010 10:52 AM To: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Fw: P2000453 Construction Meeting on 1111512010 Fyi Sent from my BlackEierrv Wireless Device From: Phillips, Roman (CDCIDCOOIBFO) (CTR) To: Nogueira, William P. Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCXOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Cc: Moss, Karen Sent: Wed Nov 17 10:50:39 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11l15f2010 All PM's will be complete by 11122 From: Nogueira, William P. Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 10:45 AM To: Phillips. Roman Bel?eid, Emanuel (CTR) Subject: Fw: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11f15f2010 Guys is this on you re schedule Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Nogueira, William P. Cc: Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wed Nov 1? 08:33:46 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11115f2010 Paul, This is the TAB request sent earlier about maintenance: i would like to con?rm that the AHUs involved are being serviced (coils and compartments cleaned, belts changed bearings greased, complete nevir set of filters installed etc) and also the exhaust fan systems (new belts, bearing checked and greased etc) Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 710433-330? Cell: 404-825-632? Fax: ??0-408-266? email; gum] @odc gov From: Nogueira, William P. Sent: Tuesday. November 16, 2010 5:42 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Lingier, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/152010 Karen, Can?t help with items 1 or 2. What needs to be veri?ed regarding maintenance work on AHU and item 3? Item 4 is being handled through Jerry (contractor) and lam not aware of any more tours in the vivarium since last week? Art has been working with contractors and ARB personnel each day. Paul N. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting on A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FMEO 1. JCI still does not have an approved sensor, the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delav. - 2. Need flags (tape) for Test and Balance to be up by 11/28/2010. 3. Verify that the maintenance work on AHU and requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 11/29. 4. WMI needs to turn of fire detectors for soldering of pipe (i assume this has alreadyI been coordinated]. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technicai Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 73'0?433?330? Cell: 404-325-552? Fax; 220-483-266? email: Mm From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:07 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Subject: P2009453 11/1312010 Construction Meeting Notes Tanya and Charles, The highlights of the meeting are as follows: 1. The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11/13 and will be installed 11f19. 2. JCI needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor. 3. The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 11,4?24. 4. The wall guards have just been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wall location. However, installation can ?nish up during TAB work. 5. The new door arrives 6. Control valves will be onsite on 11/17. 7. The new walls are up and GFR is waiting to paint them until the mortar has dried. Painting can be ?nished during TAB work. 8. Controller for the reheat coils is on back order but will not delay the project. 9. Flooring installation will smell; notify ARB of when the work is to be done. 10. Piping installation started on 11/15. 11. I Bubble tight dampers are installed. 12. New balancing dampers are installed: 13. WMI to check on when the new laminated glass for the new wall is to be installed. JCI and GFR did not attend the meeting. The only concern have at this point is Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: ??0438?8307 lCell: 404?325?6027 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesca November 2010 9:32 AM To: Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocoorosaa Cc: Protest, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: F2009453 Construction Meeting on 11I15l2010 Okay, let me ?nd out what time in the morning TAB is starting. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-453-330? Cell: 404-325-5327 Fax: 770-4 08-260? mail: falcdceov From: (cocxocoolosaey Sent: Wednesday, November 2010 9:29 AM To: Moss, Karen Howard, WilIiam (Bill) ICC: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11(15/2010 That should be ?ne. Please put it in outlook. Thanks From: MOSS Karen CDCIDCOOIBFO) To: Howard, William (Bill) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOZBFO) Sent: Wed Nov 1? 09:26:45 2010 Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11f15f2010 Pat, The preference is to use CHSE tell tales in lieu of cassette tape. The new glass with slots are being installed by 11/24. TAB contractor is scheduled to start on Nov. 29th, the Monday after Thanksgiving. Do you want to meet onsite early Monday morning? Thanks, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770433-333? Cell: 404-021-3682? Fax: rrov4oavzser email: Mm From: (CDCKOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 9:17 AM To: Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) Subject: Re: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11115/2010 We can try what you have. The type of tell-tale that is used will depend on the amount of air?ow. have some as well, We will have to wait and make an on site determination. Thanks l3 From: Moss, Karen To: Howard, William (Bill) (coqocooroSHE); (coclocooxosas) Sent: Wed Nov 17 09:10:19 2010 Subject: FW: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/15/2010 See below, does OHSE provide the flags (tell?tales]? Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: 770-480-330? Cell: 404-825-532? Fax: ?ll-4884256? email KMossl @cdogov From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, November 2010 9:07 AM To: Moss, Karen Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 111152010 1 have cassette tape theyI can have. am not sure who usually takes this on. If OHS does not like the cassette tape after BFD concludes testing, I assume it is their prerogative to swap to whatever their desire is. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 9:04 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCGOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/1512010 Paul, Please provide the tape or have OHS provide flags? Who provides ?ags in general? Thanks, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ran-4334330? Cell: 404-825-632? Fax: muss-255? email: [gum] @cdcgov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 9:10 AM To: Howard, William (Bill) Subject: FW: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11l15r?2010 FYI construction status at bottom of string. Thanks, Paul 404639-05 05 From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 9:07 AM To: Moss, Karen Nogueira, William P. Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11115,!2010 have cassette tape they can have. I am not sure who usually takes this on. If OHS does not like the cassette tape after BFO concludes testing, I assume it is their prerogative to swap to whatever their desire is. Thanks, Paul 404?639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCUOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, November 2010 9:04 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 1111532010 Paul, Please provide the tape or have OHS provide flags? Who provides flags in general? Thanks, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Ctifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: rim?433.3307 Cell: 404-325?5327 Fax.- noses-2557 emailtKMosslr?tcdceov From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 8:59 AM To: Moss, Karen Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 111'15f2010 See below. Thanks, Paul 404-639?0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/159010 A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FM E0 1. JCI still does not have an approved sensor, the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delay. I suggest that provide something that will work for testing purposes until they can provide a suitable sensor. The required sensor is water resistant, and there will be no washdown until after occupancy. Suggest that permanent sensor be calibrated when installed. 2. Need ?ags (tape) for Test and Balance to be up by Message: Questions 3. Verify that the maintenance work on AHU and requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 11f29. Saw clari?cation this morning - we will issue work order to have these items checked. 4. WMI needs to turn of ?re detectors for soldering of pipe (I assume this has alreadv been coordinated). Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 O?ice: Nil-4880307 Cell: 404-325-5327 Fax: mass-sac? email: KMoss I (also cgov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2010 4:07 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 11f13f2010 Construction Meeting Notes Tanya and Charles, The highlights of the meeting are as follows10. 11. 12. 13. The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11/13 and will be installed llflEl. needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor. The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 111'24. The wall guards havejust been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wall location. However, installation can finish up during TAB work. The new door arrives 11/19}. Control valves will be onsite on 11(17. The new walls are up and GFR is waiting to paint them until the mortar has dried. Painting can be ?nished during TAB work. Controller for the reheat coils is on back order but will not delay the project. Flooring installation will smell; notify ARB of when the work is to be done. Piping installation started on 11/15. Bubble tight dampers are installed. New balancing dampers are installed. WMI to check on when the new laminated glass for the new wall is to be installed. JCI and GFR did not attend the meeting. The only concern I have at this point is .10. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Nil?4330307 Cell: 404?325-652? Fax: WEI ?488-2607 email: KMosleodc gov Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, November 2010 9:0? AM To: Moss, Karen Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Cc: Lingler, Arthur Ft. Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11(1512010 have cassette tape they can have. i am not sure who usually takes this on. If OHS does not like the cassette tape after BFO concludes testing, I assume it is their prerogative to swap to whatever their desire is. Thanks, Paul 404-339-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 9:04 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 111'15/2010 Paul, Please provide the tape or have OHS provide flags? Who provides flags in general? Thanks, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 4134-3254332? Fax: Tim-4 88-235? email: KMossl @cdcenv From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, November 2010 8:59 AM To: Moss, Karen Nogueira, William P. Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on See below. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting on A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FM E0 1. JCI still does not have an approved sensor, the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delay. I suggest that JCI provide something that will work for testing purposes until they can provide a suitable sensor. The required sensor is water resistant, and there will be no washdown until after occupancy. Suggest that permanent sensor becalibrated when installed. 2. Need fiags {tape} for Test and Balance to be up by 11f28/2010. ?cc: Message: Questions 3. Verify that the maintenance work on AHU and requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 11/29. Saw clari?cation this morning we will issue work order to have these items checked. 4. WMI needs to turn of?re detectors for soldering of pipe assume this has already been coordinated}. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Celt: 4041-8255327 Fax: Nil-480286? email: EM 953 I {died ogov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:0? PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. (CDCIOCDOKBFO) Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: P2009453 11/13f2010 Construction Meeting Notes Tanya and Charles, The highlights of the meeting are as follows: 1. The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11/18 and will be installed 11/19. 2. JCI needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor. 3. The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 11/24. 2 4. The wall guards have just been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wall location. However, installation can ?nish up during TAB work. 5. The new door arrives 6. Control valves will be onsite on 11f17. 7. The new walls are up and GFR is waiting to paintthem until the mortar has dried. Painting can be ?nished during TAB work. 8. Controller for the reheat coils is on back order but will not delay the project. 9. Flooring installation will smell; notify ARB of when the work is to be done. 10. Piping installation started on 11/15. 11. Bubble tight dampers are installed. 12. New balancing dampers are installed. 13. WMI to check on when the new laminated glass for the new wall is to be installed. and GFH did not attend the meeting. The only concern I have at this point is JCI. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: WEI-4886307 Cell: 404?325-6327 Fax: WEI-4384657 email: FCMossl @odcgov Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, November 2010 9:04 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11I15f201 0 PauL Please provide the tape or have OHS provide flags? Who provides flags in general? Thanks Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K?9?r Atlanta. Georgia 30333 or?ce: Cell: 404325532? Fax: 770-488-266? email: @012:ng From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIUCODKBFO) Sent: Wednesday, November 2010 8:59 AM To: Moss, Karen Nogueira, William P. (CDCICCOOIBFO) Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11f15j2010 See below. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11l15!2010 A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FMEO 1. JG still does not have an approved sensor, the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delay. i suggest that .iCi provide something that will work for testing purposes until thew,r can provide a suitable sensor. The required sensor is water resistant, and there will be no washdown until after occupancy. Suggest that permanent sensor be calibrated when installed. 2. Need flags (tape) for Test and Balance to be up by 11/231?2010. Message: Questions 3. Verify that the maintenance work on AHU and requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 11329. Saw clari?cation this morning we will issue work order to have these items checked. 4. WMI needs to turn of ?re detectors for soldering of pipe (i assume this has already been coordinated). Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atianta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: rroass-ssor Cell: 404-325-5327 Fax: email: [nicdogov I From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:07 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 11/132010 Construction Meeting Notes Tanya and Charles, The highlights of the meeting are as follows: 1 The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11/18 and will be installed 11119. 2. JCI needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor- 3 The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 11/24. 4 The wall guards have just been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wall location. However, installation can ?nish up during TAB work. The new door arrives 11:19]. Control valves will be onsite on 7. The new walls are up and GFR is waiting to paint them until the mortar has dried. Painting can be ?nished during TAB work. 8. Controller for the reheat coiis is on back order but will not delay the project. 9. Flooring installation will smell; notify ARB of when the work is to be done. 10. Piping installation started on 11(15. 11. Bubble tight dampers are installed. 12. New balancing dampers are installed. 13. WMI to check on when the new laminated glass forthe new wall is to be installed. JCI and GFR did not attend the meeting. The only concern I have at this point 2 Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 4?34-825?632?? Fax: email: KMussl@cdc.aov Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 3:59 AM To: ivloss. Karen Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11i15l2010 See below. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11f15f2010 A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FMED l. JCI still does not have an approved sensor. the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delay. I suggest that JCI provide something that will work for testing purposes until they can provide a suitable sensor. The required sensor is water resistant, and there will be no washdown until after occupancy. Suggest that permanent sensor be calibrated when installed. 2. Need flags (tape) for Test and Balance to be up by 11/28j2010. Questions 3. Verify that the maintenance work on AHU and requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 11/29. Saw clarification this morning -we will issue work order to have these items checked. 4. WMI needs to turn of fire detectors for soldering of pipe (I assume this has already been coordinated]. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-532? Fax: ?ll-4332657 email: gov From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:07 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: P2009453 111'13f2010 Construction Meeting Notes Tanya and Charles, The highlights of the meeting are as follows: 1 The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11/18 and will be installed 11f19. 2. JCI needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor. 3. The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 11f24. 4 The wall guards have just been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wail location. However, installation can ?nish up during TAB work. The new door arrives 11/191'. 6. Control valves will be onsite on 11/17. 7. The new walls are up and GFR is waiting to paint them until the mortar has dried. Painting can be ?nished. during TAB work. 8. Controller for the reheat coils is on back order but will not delay the project. 9. Flooring installation will smell; notify of when the work is to be done. 10. Piping installation started on 11/15. 11. Bubble tight dampers are installed. 12. New balancing dampers are installed. 13. WMI to check on when the new laminated glass for the new wall is to be installed. U1 and GFR did not attend the meeting. The only concern have at this point is JCI. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 O?ice: Cell: 404-325-5327 Fax: noses?ass? email: Wm Mathe, Chester (cocrocoorosem From: Probst. Paul E. Sent: Tuesday. August 31, 2010 11:26 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subiect: Questions Karen: 1. Cassette tape is suitable for tell-tales. If contractor has problem getting some of that. I am sure it can be provided. 2. Regarding pressure differential testing for personnel egress, this is not necessary as it is Understood that the controls program has not changed other than adjustable setpoints. However, if the control program has to be re- dovvnloaded into the CID, then it is advisable and considered prudent to verify egress pressures. lmmzusc g. FMEO cannot ensure tion on the WW U-S-C- 2325 level. I would advise JCI to 262m?- This is something JCI did on the projectto install th ?an i i .1 Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir., Operations - BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 8:34 AM To: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst1 Paul E. Arthur R. (CDCIOCODIBFD) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 10152010 Paul, This is the TAB request sent earlier about maintenance: [would like to confirm that the AHUs involved are being serviced (coils and compartments cleaned, belts changed, bearings greased, complete new set of ?lters installed etc) and also the exhaust fan systems (new belts, bearing checked and greased etc) Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Keg? Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404325532? Fax; noses-ass? email: Eli-toss {alodcgov From: Nogueira, William P. Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 5:42 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFCI) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCXOCOOJBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on Karen, Can?t help with items 1 or 2. What needs to be veri?ed regarding maintenance work on AHU and item 3? Item 4 is being handled through Jerry {contractor} and i am not aware of any more tours in the viva rium since last week? Art has been working with contractors and ARB personnel each day. Paul N. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11(1512010 A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FMEU 1. JCI still does not have an approved sensor, the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delay. 2. Need flags {tape} forTest and Balance to be up by 11/28f2010. 3. Verify that the maintenance work on AHU and requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 11J29. 4. WMI needs to turn of ?re detectors for soldering of pipe (I assume this has already been coordinated). Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 270-438-5307 Cell: 404-325-682? Fax: Will?4834657 email: From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:0]r PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. (CDCIOCOOJBFD) Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 11/131?2010 Construction Meeting Notes Tanya and Charles, The highlights of the meeting are as follows: 1 The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11,!18 and will be installed 11f19. 2. JCI needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor. 3. The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 11/24. 4 The wall guards havejust been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wall location. However, installation can finish up during TAB work. The new door arrives Control valves will be onsite on 11(17. 7. The new walls are up and GFR is waiting to paint them until the mortar has dried. Painting can be finished during TAB work. 8. Controller for the reheat coils is on back order but will not delay the project. 9. Flooring installation will smell; notify ARB of when the work is to be done. 10. Piping installation started on 11/15. 11. Bubble tight dampers are installed. 12, New balancing dampers are installed. 13. WMI to check on when the new laminated glass for the new wall is to he installed. JCI and GFR did not attend the meeting. The only concern I have at this point is JCI. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-97 Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-5327 Fax: Hill?4884857 email: {aged cigov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16. 2010 5:42 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Lingler. Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11(15i2010 Karen, Can't help with items 1 or 2. What needs to be veri?ed regarding maintenance work on AHU and item 3? Item 4 i being handled through .Ierrv (contractor) and i am not aware of any more tours in the vivarium since last week? Art has been working with contractors and ARE personnel each day. Paul N. From: Moss, Karen Sent: uesdav, November 16, 2010 4:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11! 15/2010 A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FM E0 1. 4. still does not have an approved sensor, the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delay. Need flags (tape) for Test and Balance to be up by 11/28/2010. Verify that the maintenance work on AHU and requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 11f29. needs to turn of fire detectors for soldering of pipe assume this has already been coordinated]. Karen MOSS P. E. Mechan ical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta1 Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-453-330? Cell: 404-525-582? Fax: 270-4 53-266? email: KMossl @cdbgov From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:07 PM To: Daniels.r Charles E. Tanya A. (CDCJOCOOJBFD) Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 111'13f2010 Construction Meeting Notes Tanya and Charles, The highlights of the meeting are as follows: 1 2. 3. 4 Sn?" 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11/18 and will be installed 11119. JCI needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor. The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 11,14. The wall guards have just been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wall location. However, installation can ?nish up during TAB work. The new door arrives Control valves will be onsite on 11/17. The new walls are up and GFR is waiting to paint them until the mortar has dried. Painting can be ?nished during TAB work. Controller for the reheat coils is on back order but will not delay the project. Flooring installation will smell; notify ARB of when the work is to be done. Piping installation started on 11/15. Bubble tight dampers are installed. New balancing dampers are installed. to check on when the new laminated glass for the new wall is to be installed. JCI and GFR did not attend the meeting. The only concern 1 have at this point is Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-5527 Fax: TIMES-255T email: KMossl Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Sent: To: Subject: Moss, Karen Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:20 PM Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11(15i2010 A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FM E0 1. 4. still does not have an approved sensor, the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delay. Need flags (tape) forTest and Balance to be up Verify that the maintenance work on AHU and EF's requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 11,129. needs to turn of ?re detectors for soldering of pipe (i assume this has already been coordinated]. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325052? Fax: email: KMossl r?icdcgox From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFC) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:0? PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: P2009453 11! 13.12010 Construction'Meeting Notes Tanya and Charles, The highlights of the meeting are as follows: 1 2. 3. 4 ins-n The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11,118 and will be installed 11/19. JCI needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor. The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 11/24. The wall guards have just been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wall location. However, installation can finish up during TAB work. The new door arrives Control valves will be onsite on 11f17. The new walls are up and GFR is waiting to paint them until the mortar has dried. Painting can be ?nished during TAB work. 8. Controller for the reheat coils is on back order but will not delayr the project. 9. Flooring installation will smell; notify ARE. of when the work is to he done. 10. Piping installation started on 11/15. 11. Bubble tight dampers are installed. 12. New balancing dampers are installed. 13. WMI to check on when the new laminated glass for the new wall is to be installed. JCI and GFR did not attend the meeting. The onlw,l concern I have at this point is JCL Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-532? Fax: Will-4332657 ac 262ath Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Williams. Alli one 2e2arnjs??E-u-uu- To: Go: Egg)? Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:35 AM 'BIake.N.Ba Nogueira, William P. (cocrommcezm); Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOJBFO) a Probst, Paul'E. Pedone. James Phillips. Roman (cocrocoorBFO) Buchr son ?rms:- eit. Wayne P. (aware Thank you, will be noti?ed when reactivation will be required (anticipated in Jan 2011). (anal-4 so. Sent using BlaokBerry From: Blake.N.Bayless@jci.com To: ueira William P. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) ac: Bel?eld, Emanuel (ore); .. Probst, Paul E. (copiocoozaFo); Pedone, Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOJBFO) (CT Buchheitr Wayne P. (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Tue NOV 16 . t' 8:35 2010 Egg-a $5213? door: alarm --for--are disabled. Blake Bayless Southeast Security Systems Johnson Controls. inc. 1350 Northmeadow Parkway Suite 100 Roswell, GA 30076 O: [104.639.1649 0. mus; . blaite.n.bayless@joi.eom "Noguelra, William P. ?pbn6?cdegow ?I1I16l?20?l? 10:13 AM Blake, yes by all means please put door on ..since is for To 'tcndosetsnsee?or 2 .. Iii-G cocrolomcezm)" I It: I -- "Probet, Paul e. "Phillips, Roman lbir?; (blt31'42 3 ?3 . 262601] James (mist-42 252ath "Belfield, Emanuel "Eiuehheit1 Wayne Subject RE: .warium. From: Blake.N.Baerss@jci.com 1 . h2 re COGS-OW U.S.C. us C- .. ?g?gg?uesday, November 16, 2010 9:232 {cocrocoostoL?r I a Cc: (coolers/nears); Bel?eld, Emanuel (coczocooxsFO) (customs/ems); Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoohsroh Pedone, James (coo/ocoorossP); Phillips, Roman 3, OCOOIBFO) Buchrm'r wanna P. (CDCIOCOOJDSEP) Vivarium (bitBJ 42 LI 3. continuously going into alarm due to the Work going on in that area. They have requested the alarms for this terminal to be disabled. Do you approve? Blake Bayless Southeast Security Systems Johnson Controls, Inc. 1350 Northn'leadow Parkway Suite 100 Roswell. GA 30076 0' I I tbit?l blake.n.bayless@joi.oom "Nogueira, William P. cc (cooroiomceomo Joshua.M.Cunningham@ici.com, I .iolf?l- :ooroSHE) 'bit?' ."Pro'ost, PautE. mm. "Buchheit, Wayne P. evelLiI'lk As of 3:30pm, ?11!2!10, the FORCED and PROPPED door alarms are disabled for the following ibiil 262: 1-42 Cardholders will still need their badges to access these terminals. *"Please Note: You will need to notify us when the points can he re-activated after decon is completed. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns, Blake Bayless Southeast Security Systems Johnson Controls, inc. as 252 atm- .. 1350 Northmeadow Parkway Suite 100 Roswell. GA 30076 O: 404.639.1640 C: biake.n.bavless@jci.com to] i "Nogueira, William F. 02:56 PM a use. Blake, I spoke to ho referred to an email from SA or animals and the area has been decon'd. We can overrid morning. Completion of work may be February if not sooner. Thanks Paul - - To Blake.N.Bayless@jci.com. ?Buchheit. Wayne P. cc Joshua.M.Cunningha - . . If - - James (CDCIOCOOIDSEPV (customer Ib?i3; 42 US E: g- 262afh3 From: Blake.N.Bayless@jci.com Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 12:28 PM To: Buchheit, Wayne P. (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) . hua.M.Curnin i . Paul, ham@jci.. Vivarium, I'lJ'iBi . . ing the blElviva'r'iUi?n. 8ince-there-ar - ivari-um work beginsat 7:00.361 . ?Prob-st. Paul E. I {bli3i42 ra, William P. Pedone, James (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) just left you a voice mail with regards to the email below. Feel free to email a list of terminals or we can discuss it over the phone, which ever is more convenient for you. When requested modi?cations are made, I will follow-up with an email of what actions were taken. We will need to be noti?ed when the decon is completed and alarm menitoring needs to be reactivated. Thank you for your cooperation, Blake Southeast Security Systems Johnson Controls, Inc. 1350 Norlhmeadow Parkway Suite 100 Roswell, GA 30076 O: 404.639.1649 C: "Buehheit. Wayne P. (CD CIOCOOJDS dwpb2@ed e.gov:- 0?:43 AM To Joshue.M.Cunningham@joi.eom or. "Pedone, James 'Nogueira. William P. mm] 42 i- {[1115 CDCEDW . .. Nari? {one} 42 L: Gentlemen. Please get with Paul Nogoeira and ?gure out what readers and alarms need to be overridden etc. and make it so. ?Jayne Buehheit, RE. Security Systems Engineer Office of Security and Emergency Preparedness Centers for Disease Control 1690 Clifton Road 21 12118 EMS-A22 Atlanta, GA 30333 all. . n. 0' 1 NOTICE: 4(gegtigptamination (decon) of th select-agentwork-going an meme This message and accompanying documents are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521? and contains Sensitive But Unclassi?ed (SBU) information intended for the speci?ed individual(s) - for which disclosure, misuse, alteration or destruction could adversely affect National Security or government interests. If you are not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby noti?ed that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any action based 0n the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by E-mail, and delete the original message. From: ibis-42 5-0 W32 Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 2:38 PM To: Hairston-Nash, Diane Buchheit, Wayne P. Pedone, James . cc: Cunningham, Josh .- COOIOSEP) Bayless, Blake N. cocrocoo OSEP) love: I (coo/oromczveo); Damon, Inger K. (cocxoromczveo); Singletary innit-12 U5 C: ?2v32aihi I Meadows Kristi Zambuto, Laura R. Williams, Allison ivarium, ibli31'42 Good Afternoon Diane. Howard, William (Bill) Su -]ecl: l. The purpose of this e-mail is that the Of?ce of Health. Safety, and Env_ironment has begun a ivar'r-m "on 1 located on lthis week. There is Vivarium area The OSHE activity will most liker result in multiple door alarms. After OSHE has completed thei new? activities, Buildings and Facilities Office will begin a project on the air handling system for that area that will cover the period November 1 through most likely January 29. 2011. During this period to - . be no select age areas under the I Itr_ll3}242 USE. Please note that the scope of this project does not include i252? Icontinues full operation during this period under the direction of ms We will notify you once the air handling modi?cation has been completed and programs resume Work in the area. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or concerns regarding this e-mail. Sincerely. roars):ch so is ass-arm {Dii3} 262 ibilf?i s25: Mattie, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 1:42 PM To Raymond, George DIBFO) 31:0. Con?rmation of - Vivarium Occupancy Date FYI Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Chandler Geore Cox, Nancy (coders/scrap); Meechan, Paul J. (cocxocooiosns) Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Moss, Karen Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Tanya A. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Tue Not:r 09 2010 BED Confirmation ofI:IVivarium Occupancy Date Friends: At the 2 NOV, meeting, I said that BFO would con?rm a occupancy:r target date for the of 4 JAN 2011. Based on the ?nal scope of work and several meetings with the Contractor over the past few days. the revised occupancy target date for the Vivarium is 10 JAN 2011. BFO will try and beat that date as i__-_worlt through the project if at all possible. I hope that this revised target date is still acceptable to Special Pathogens I and OSHE. Thanks for your continued support on this project! G.- Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIDSEP) From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: ar 09. 2010 1:0? PM To: Cox. Nancy Meechan. Paul J. E) Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Mess. Karen Williams. Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Tanya A. ow in, Ken L. (CDCIOCODIBFO) .. c- Vivarium Occupancy Date lung-.42 osc. gza2am} Friends: At the 2 NOV, meeting. I said that BFO would con?rm a occupancy target date for the vivarium of4 JAN 2011. Based on the final scope of Work and several meetings with the Contractor over the past few days, the revised occupancy target date for the vivarium is 10 JAN 2011. BFO will try and beat that date as we work through the project if at all possible. I hope that this revised target date is still acceptable to Special Pathogens, and OSHE. Thanks for 1your continued support on this project] G.- Maths, Chester From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Monda November 08, 2010 3:32 PM To: CDCIOIDINCEZID) Cc: Cox, NancyI Meechan, Paul J. Tanya A. ProbsL Paul E. Maxwell, James C. SC (00010 - Bowen. Ken L. Williams, Jeffery (CDCJOCOOIBFO) gega?hlblect: .. . a-IVivarfum Project runs: iThank you very much for the con?rmation memo. BFO had a ?nal meeting with the Contractor this morning and i ass Tanya to confirm the Contractor?s acceptance of 4 JAN 2011, as the scheduled completion date. Tanya. could you send us a veri?cation e-mail, please? Thank you all for assisting us in wrapping this up G.- Memo?ld From: '42 U3 0- 5* 2523f?! (CDCIOIDINCZVED) Sent: Monday, November 08,r 2010 1:45 PM To: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) {brrsialzo?lom Nan Meechan, Paul J. Project All. As requested, have provided a memo regarding the Nov 2 meeting (attached). Please feel free to distribute to you staff. The project is moving along. with three penetrations for supply air successfully completed (for me the biggest concern), and work on sealing up the door at the West end of the central corridor has been initiated. I am optimistic that the project ceed on schedule. {bio 2623011 .. File: Mem'dj?ld ivarium-Project_8NOV1ilpdf {rd-f hike, Date From Subject To CC {bjl3j 42 US C. ?262aihi it 6 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 3. HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Memorandum November 8, 2010 U.E- . .back..to use by. ERR-oncethe-Building As a follow up to our meeting on November in which the schedule for the Building?ivarium air redirection project was discussed, I am sending you this memo to touch on what was municated. At issue was the extra time that was added to the project's schedule, which would have greatly delayed the return to operation for the Vivarium (potentially as late as mid February). You. communicated that BFO had reevaluated the time needed to perform certain elements of the work, and it was determined that the project could be ?nished much earlier. possibly sometime in December. However, a tentative target date of January 4, 2011 was agreed Upon by those in attendance as an acceptable date of completion for the project. It was understood that BFO cannot guarantee that the projectwould not be delayed beyond this date, as unexpected complications could be encountered. Also addressed in the meeting was the need for a backup plan to provide pace for emergency use bDivision staff if a need should arise before the project is completed and the facility is ready for reoccupation. The area is back in service (from maintenance), but may be inadequate to meet the response need. The use of additional Eluildin Vivarium space was proposed as a possible solution, but permission from the rid Rabies Branch PRE) was needed in order to use their DSAT-registered space. I communicated this need to this (Chief, PR8), and PRB will not require the use of the id January. There was some concern that if the space were to become occupied by the 252a Division, the use of would be lost to PRB. I explained that this would not be the case, a that its use by the Division would be strictly for 'r emergency response efforts, and the space would revert ivarium returned to service. ltwas also noted (by me) that so "be'ut?ilizedfOr emergency response effortj garticularly if the work required iblt3?i: sszaih. conditions than are available in the Buildin . LI 5 i3 {bits} 42 eczaini I: 3?"2623th] imitates us ?2623iihi Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probet, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, November 08. 2010 1:32 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) Subject: Vivarium Scope Spec rev 9-3-10.de Bill: Attached is scope as of Sept. 8. 2010. Paul Probat, PE Asst. Din. Operations BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404:639-0505 Cell: 404-235-2550 CDC P2009453 - SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEIJ) Section 010101 HVAC MODIFICATIONS Foei IJS I SECTION 01 0?10 SUMMARY OF WORK FOR SOLUTION ORDER CONCEPT (SOC) Summary of Work PART GENERAL 1.1 SECTION A. This section includes the following: Scope of Work. Work by the Government. Government Furnished Products. Contractor use of site and premises. Work Sequence. Government occupancy. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS it. Related sections include the following: Section 01300 - Submittais Section 01311 - Network Analysis Schedules Section 01546 Health and Safety Section 01547 Personnel Security Requirements Section 01700 - Project Closeout 1.3 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD A. Project Delivery Method: The method of delivery for this project is a Solution Order Concept (SOC). The SOC is characterized by the following elements: 1! SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION The SOC is a processthat does not utilize conventional design services, thereby empowering the Contractor to become very involved in the project's earliest stages. The Contractor, as a team member with CDC, will be expected to provide suggestions, ask questions, and offer potential alternative methods, systems, or products to the Scope of Work (80W) provided by CDC. The SOC process is based on CDC and the Contractor meeting at the site, reaching consensus on the scope, schedule. and cost of the project, confirming all agreements in writing, awarding the contract, and executing the work. . Site Visit. The purpose of the site visit is to convey CDC's technical objectives for the project (80W) to the Contractor and to be a working meeting that moves the team closer to the final definition of the project's scope. While all systems, materials, and issues may not be selected or settled during this site visit, all known issues should be revealed and discussed. a. Required Attendees: Contractor's Project Manager and Superintendent; each major trade sub contractor's Project Manager; CDC Contracting Officer; CIMO (andior Project Manager(s). design discipline eXperts, COTR, and Building Manager; program representative[s); and appropriate support personnel from OHS, ITSO, DSEP, and similar programs. b. A follow up site meeting may be appropriate it additional information or clarification is required. PGO Request for Proposal. After the sow has been refined, PGC will send the Solicitation, Otter, and Award document and attachments to the Contractor for pricing. Contractor's Proposal. The Contractor?s proposal includes a schedule, scope, cost, and submittal materials as appropriate and required In the sow to provide a solution to the requirements defined by the sow and other components of the Solicitation. The following are technical Revised September 8. 2010 CDC P2009453 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 010102 HVAC MODIFICATIONS FOFII Summary of Work requirements for the initial proposal to be submitted to the Contracting Officer (also refer to Section 01300): a. Demonstrate compliance with the SOW. b. Cost for the work and services broken down by builc?ng and detailed down to the trade by work activity, number of labor hours, and hourly costs. c. Equipment and material cut sheets, shop drawings, and productdata, including MSDS sheets as appropriate. d. Provide alternatives fro consideration by CDC as appropriate. e. Construction schedule of activities. This would include necessary utility outages with duration estimates. B. Technical Evaluation. The technical evaluation by CDC will include, but may not be limited to, the following: . 2. 3. 4. 5. Verification of compliance with the sow. Acceptance or rejection of Equipment and Materials submittals. Acceptance or rejection of required submittals, shop drawings, samples, and all other information required by the sow. Evaluation of Construction Activity Schedule. Cost proposal. C. Award. The criteria for award are contained in the Soticitation, Offer, and Award document and attachments as issues by the Contracting Officer for this project. 1. Upon receipt of the contract, the Contractor shall eItecute any other non-site specific requirements of the contract, such as ordering items with long lead times, shop fabrication of assemblies, initiation of shop drawings and other submittals processes, update or partial short circuit and coordination study (if required), and all other activities to insure the project shall be completed according to the project scope, cost, and schedule. D. Notice to Proceed. The information in this paragraph in no way supersedes, negates. or defines the requirements contained in the Solicitation, Offer: and Award document issued by the Contracting Officerfor this project. 1. Upon receipt of all requirements in the Soiicitation, Offer, andAward document relating to award of Notice to Proceed (NTP), the Contracting Officer will, at the preconstru ction meeting with the Contractor, issue the NTP with the following understanding that the Contractor shall do the following activities: a. Proceed with preparation of submittals, shop drawings, project schedule, and other similar requirements in the contract. b. Not be allowed on site until the requirements of Section 01547Personnei Security have been fulfilled for the Contractor?s Project Manager and Superintendent. c. Provide the requirements of the Preliminary Outline Schedule in Section 013tt Network Anaiysis Scheduies at the preconstruction meeting. d. Commence personnel security process on remaining staff for project. e. Not be allowed to commence work on site until the Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan has been approved by the Contracting Of?cer. 1.4 DESCRIPTION OF WORK A. The We ., i this project comprises certain repairs and improvements to the existing interior of Building located at CDC's Roybal campus. These repairs and improvements include, but are not limited to, the following aspects as further defined and described in the Contract Documents: BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI Revised September 3, 2010 CDC P20119453 - HVAC MODIFICATIONS FOHI 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 18. 19. 2D. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. SENSITIVE INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 010103 Summary of Work @252341?. Mechanical Tap into the existing 72 14 supply ductwork in interstitial space and route new ductwork to new pneumatic phoenix supply valve. Route two 11" round ducts to two new phoenix valves and one 10" round duct to relocated existing phoenix valve. Route to new heating coils. Contractor to field verify tit and routing of new ductwork with existing conditions. Route all main ductwork as high as possible. Transition from new phoenix valves outlet to 14x12 heating coils. See appendix for attached heating coil selection. Core slab penetrations as shown on floor slab in interstitial space and per architectural and structural requirements. Slab penetration locations to be determined by nondestructive testing. Nondestructive testing to be done on the first day of the lab shut down to verify that no conduit is in the slab at proposed openings. Nondestructive testing to be done under separate CDC contract. Route new 12 12 ductwork from the new phoenix valve through new slab penetrations to new supply air diffusers in the corridor. Provide out of floor tire damper Ruskin Model DIDB2D {Type BC) in interstitial before slab penetration. Install per manufacturer and SMACNA fire damper out of installation instructions. Diffusers shall be 12 12; Titus model number 300RS-BS. Provide gas tight bubble damper at each diffuser. . Re?route fire sprinkler pipe if required. CDC to provide "As-Built? of sprinkler pipe in the dirty corridor. Tap into existing hot water supply and return pipes and route new 1" pipes to new reheat coils. Provide new hot water two way control valves to match existing control valves at existing heating coils. Provide all associated controls and devices to make a complete supply system. insulate subply ducbvork and hot water pipe. All devices, materials and equipment to match existing unless specified otherwise. Provide missing opposed blade balancing dampers on existing ductwork as identified by baseline Test and Balance Report. Provide new water proof temperature sensor in new wall of dirty corridor to control new heating coils. Provide paintable silicone to seal diffusers in corridor. Remove existing exhaust grille in elevator lobby room 901 to pressurize space and patch per architectural requirements. Demolish existing ductwork and phoenix valve back to main trunk. Pie-use existing 8" round phoenix valve. Replace two counterbalanced isolation dampers at I. Counterbalance dampers to be sized and selected by fan manufacturer. Contractor to field verify dimensions before ordering dampers. . . Replace two low leakage motorized bypass dampers at Ilblfai' 42 3523M I Bypass dampers to be sized and selected by fan manufacturer. Contractor tofield verify dimensions before ordering. Provide motor sheaves for fans if required by Test and Balance after construction and during commissioning. Tap into existing exposed elbow and add new stainless steel thermal double wall 12 to supply ductwork in shower anterocm. route to new 12 12 diffuser; Titus Model number with opposed blade balancing damper. Contractor to field verify existing conditions for location and fit of ductwork and diffuser. Test and Balance of exhaust and supply systems in the Vivarium to be done under separate contract. Ferrel-42 so ?262athi Near the end of construction Test and Balance will perform preliminary tan testingitroubleshooting. Repair torn and add missing insulation on ductwork and pipe for all pipe and ductwork related to AHLJ- libil?i Identity location of at plugs for future. eal arr leakage at existing six fire dampers located in the interstitial that servesthe clean corridors. Revised September 3. 2010 BUT UNCLASSIFIED Issut CDC P2009453 - Section 010104 MODIFICATIONS FOFI Summary of Work 26. Contractor to provide drawings. - Provide shop drawings, and submittals via hard copy and electronically. 28. Contractor shall provide detailed sheet metal and pipe shop drawings for CDC approval. 29. Glass slot size shall be verified with CDC before ordering glass. 30. Replace Iilters in animal holding rooms. ?leJaemataiesiaaxiatiagtan. . 32'. At tan plenum box provide gasket'ed'12 12 access door with door handle thatiocks. Door is to-provide; Visual and physicaLwesato belncated adjacentjaeastiaglwo position damnat- 99M ibitai 42 LI 5 262cm] ruledin existing twoposition control dampers to a moduiatingdarnper. Damper will Homage chi?SEE allowance Existing Control Sequence shall remain-with modi?cations as follows-:1; During fan operation, BAS system shall modulate both contrci dampers located at the root exhaust plenum in unison to maintain Initialqsetpoint shall be 3:51 TAB Companvlo determinelfinal On a faniailur'e as sensed by one-cit the-two correntswitches, an alarm'shall be sent. Exhaust piengni mlw'control dampers shall continue to modulate maintaining exhauSt'duct-staticpressure setpointrh? faiture of both fans as sensed be_generated__aad_th_? H_q_associated AHU-Suppiytan Shall Stop.E A I Upon drop in exhaust duct Static 2.0 (adj) below set'point. a warning alarm Shallbe generated. This alarm point-is the point where the Phoenix exhaust vavIes begin to lose contrgi_pf_ajrjigy_vdrop in exhaust do ressure below 1.5" (adj) associatedrAHU shall stop.- (associated with exhaust fans-I -- (agile) 0t Egg-1:2 5'3? the scheduled airflow as measured by the airflow station an alarm Shall be generated. The TAB A 1 contractor Will determine the actuatsiipplv airflow percentage that repr each: an eoress ism II: and that Ijt?gai osc value Shall stop. Exhaust-fans exhaust - . . plenum control dampers shall modulate to maintain (adj) exhaust duct_'Static. If? . a . a cannot be maintained that allows for a safe egre?sstrom the area, BASs?jIr'Stem shall stop . . 5 dampers will modulate to maintain static setpoint. Safe egress exhaust duct static; p_r_es_s_dre will shallbe?acuailv initiated;- I'bit'3I42 use a I 36:3ch 31h? Upon Supply fan'tailure the. the exhaust fan control darn per shall'rn'odula'te'to maintain a (adii exhaust duct static - TAB air iiowarxiaataeoresi? a Architectural if? . Remove-door and till opening with concrete masonry. Finish wall with epoxy paint. 2. Provide new window in new infillwall. a a 3. Provide new concrete masonry wall in Corridor - -- Instaunewaumma?c opening Fppuawjng So. a door in new masonry wall. Install metal wall game at ma onry wall. Finish wall with epoxy.r paint. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Revised September B, 2019 coc P2009453 - . HVAC MODIFICATIONS FCRI SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 010105 Summary of Work 4. Remove existing directional air flow ?ping-pong indicator devicestrom approximately 33 doors. Install manufacturer supplied caps to resulting penetrations in watts. Provide new rubber door sweepsfbottoms to approximately 12 doors. 5. Remove existing vision glass from approximate iy 30 doors. Replace with new glass sized to leave air gaps in doors. - 6. Provide new full gasket sets to three sets of doors. Resulting door assemblies to seal to gas-tight condition when closed. Paint the ceiling bays at each new slab penetration in Corridor with epoxy paint. WORK BY THE GOVERNMENT A. The Government has a direct contract with the test and balance firm. CDC will also decontaminate the area priorto commencement of work-in the animal area and after completion of work. No other work by CDC is anticipated forthis Project. 1.5 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PRODUCTS A. No products or materials will be furnished by the Government for this Project. 1.6 CONTRACTOR USE OF SITE AND PREMISES A. Limit use of site and premises to allow: 1. Regular and continued use of, and access to, immediate area around Buildings 15, 16, 18, 21, and 23, adjacent walkways and CDC parking area. B. Construction Operations: Limit construction operations to the areas noted on drawings. Government escurity at CDC facilities requires that the Contractor and all agents remain in the area designated by the limit of work in the Contract Documents. Failure to observe this requirement is grounds for dismissal of the offending party. Repeated violations may be grounds for dismissal of the Contractor, or agent at fault. or both. 1. Contractors on exterior projects shall not be allowed access to the interior of any CDC building, except to perform work scheduled in an interior space. . Time Restrictions for Performing Won-t: All Work which cannot be periorrned during normal duty hours shall require the Contractor to submit a schedule of anticipated Work to the Contracting Officer prior to execution of the Work. This includes utility outages, work on Federal holidays, and other activities. Known activities include the following: 1. Outages and Shutdown: The Contractor shall arrange with the Contracting Officer. Utility outages and associated work shall be scheduled from 6:00 pm to 6:00 am. Monday through Thursday, or 6:00 pm, Friday, to 6:00 am, Monday. The Contractor shall request such outages a minimum of 10 days prior to shutdown. There shall be no exceptions to the 10 day minimum requirement- 2. Work on Weekends, Federal holidays and other requests: The Contractor shall arrange with the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall provide such request a minimum of 5 days prior to scheduled Work. B. Site Conditions: The Contractor, shall upon completion of the Wont, repair, alter, remove, andior SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION replace exterior materials to conform to each material's condition prior to commencement of work. Revised September 3, 2010 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 - Section 010106 HVAC MODIFICATIONS FORI I Summary of Work E. Project Cleanup and Closeout. An amount equal to 10% of the contract amount, including all modifications, will be held by the Contracting Officer until all project cleanup and closeout requirements have been perform ed by the Contractor and acceptable to the Contracting Officer. 1. Project cleanup and closeout issues that the Contractor shall be responsible for include, but are not limited to, the following: a) Removal of all debris, excess materials, and equipment brought on site by the Contractor or any agent of the Contractor. b) Removal, replacement, or refurbishment as required of all Government utilities used during execution of the work. c) Submission and resubmission if required, of all closeout documents required by this project. These include resolution of final inspection listing, operating and maintenance manuals. staff training, warranty information. as-built documents, and others as listed in the relevant specification sections. 2. Prior to Final Acceptance, the Contractor shall request a review of these issues by the Contracting Officer. Upon successful completion of the review, and when all defective issues have been resolved to the satisfaction of the Contracting Officer, the affected funds will be released. Limit use of site and premises to allow: 1. Government occupancy of the building. 2. Use of site and adjacent spaces by the Government and the public for normal daily operations and functions. 1.7 GOVERNMENT (USER) OCCUPANCY A. People employeesrvisitors) in Buildingwill occupy its premises, including but not limited to the project area, during the entire period of construction. Contractor is to keep in consideration the access and egress needs of these occupants. B. Cooperate with the Government, represented by the Contracting Of?cer, to minimize conflict, and to facilitate the daily operations of Building 18 as well as other buildings and facilities on the Roybal Campus. C. Schedule the Work to accommodate this requirement. 1.3 DOCUMENT SECURITY A. Documentsecurity is importantto the Government. The documents provided to youin any format are sensitive and you must take provisions to protect the confidentiality of the information. The requirements below are intended to supplement current documents security policy. By acceptance of any printed or electronic documents, you agree to the following: 1. The documents shall not be transmitted to a third party without Written permission of the Contracting Officer. Refer to Part 2 of this specification section for the DocumentTracking Log. 2. All documents shall be returned at the conclusion of the project. No documents shall be kept for any purpose by you, your firm, or any of your subcontractors, suppliers, or agents. Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. 3. All electronic files shall be deleted from storage devices (computers. zip drives, hand held devices, and such). Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. 4. All CDIDVD and magnetic disk shall be returned to the Contracting Officer. Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (seut Revised September a, 201 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION OOC P2009453 - Section 01010? HVAC MODIFICATIONS . . . .. Summary of Work 5. All devices that contain electronic information shall be protected by password. 6. All printed documents shall be stored in a secure area until returned to the Contracting Officer. Return of all required documents and media shall be part of the project?s completion and closeout requirements. and shall be satisfactorily completed priorto approval of final invoice. ?l.9 GOVERNMENT USE OF THE SITE interior: The following is a brief description of Government use of the site that may have varying effects on the execution of the Work required under this contract. The reqments and demands for Government operations. schedules, and programs in Building will contintie to occur throughout the construction period. Response to these requirements and demands will be met by the Government in spaces adjacent to the - project area. Therefore, it is very critical that construction activities for this project, including workers, equipment. and materials. have minimal potential for disruption to Government activities in the spaces adjacent to the project location. Notify and coordinate with project officer when interior occupants could be affected by exterior work activities. B. Exterior: The following is a brief description of Government use of the site that may have varying effects on the execution of the Work required under this contract. 1. The operation and function of the adjacent buildings and spaces will continue during the construction period of this project. Pedestrians. vehicles, equipment, and goods will continue to be present in adjacent exterior spaces to the construction site. 2. A schedule of Contractor vehicular movement of dumpsters. deliveries, and other similar issues shall be provided to the Contracting Officer for approval to maintain safety and minimize disruptions and conflicts to all parties. Activities concerning placement of dumpsters and storage it removal of hazardous materials, will only be executed after guidance from the Project Officer. 3. The Contractor shall provide a delivery schedule of all equipment and materials to the Contracting Officer at least 10 calendar days prior to the earliest scheduled delivery that requires the use of the loading dock. The Contracting Of?cer will coordinate Governmentuse of the loading dock with Contractor requests and accommodate such requests to the greatest extent possible. 1.10 CONTRACTOR ACTIONS UPON NOTICE OF CONTRACT AWARD A. The information in this paragraph in no way supercedes, negates. or defines the requirements contained in the Contract. Unless othenvise specifically addressed with different requirements in the Contract terms and conditions, the Contractor shall immediater initiate the following actions upon receipt of the Notice of Award: 1. Fulfill requirements of Section 0154? Personnel Security Requirements for the Contractor=s Superintendent and Project Manager. The Contractor will not be allowed on site until these requirements are met. The Government will not be responsible nor liable for any delays to the Work for the Contractor's inability or failure to obtain timely clearances or sufficient numbers of cleared personnel. 2. Prepare and submit to the Contracting Of?cer the required Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan. The Contractor will not be allowed to commence work on site until the Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan has been approved by the Contracting Officer. Any delays caused by the Contractor's failure to obtain an approved Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan shall be attributed to the Contractor and shall not be considered an excusable delay. 3. Take action and complete all effort necessary to produce and present the Preliminary Outline sensitive our UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION [soul Revised September a. 201 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SHU) CDC P2009453 . Section 010108 HVAC MODIFICATIONS - Summary of Work Schedule in 0131f Analysis Schedules at the preconstruction meeting. The Contractor shall be considered delinquent in performance if these documents are not ready tor presentation at the preconstruction meeting. 4. Commence personnel security process on proiect's workers. 5. Proceed with preparation of submittals, shop drawings, and other similar requirements of the contract. 6. Anticipate receiving formal Notice to Proceed from the Contracting Officer within 28 calendar clays alter Notice of Award. It is customary. but not required, forthe Contracting Of?cer to issue Notice to Proceed at the preconstruction meeting. PART 2 PRODUCTS A. Document Tracking Log. Attachment is the form to be used upon approval by the Contracting Officer of request to provide documents to a third party. TEMPLATE - ocument Tracking L. PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used END OF SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Revised September 8. 201B Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCODIBFD) Sent: Wednesday. November 2010 8:34 AM To: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: P2000453 Construction Meeting on 11405102010 PauL This is the TAB request sent earlier about maintenance: I would like to confirm that the AHUs involved are being serviced {coils and compartments cleaned, belts changed, bearings greased . complete new set of ?lters installed etc) and also the exhaust fan systems (new belts, bearing checked and greased etc) Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ??0-433-330? Cell: 404?025?632? Fax: 770?433?255? email: KMossl@cdc.gov From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 1'5,r 2010 5:42 PM To: Mossr Karen Cc: Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11115;?2010 Karen, Can?t help with items 1 or 2. What needs to be veri?ed regarding maintenance work on AHU and EF's item 3? Item 4 is being handled through Jerry (contractor) and i am not aware of any more tours in the vivarium since last week? Art has been working with contractors and ARB personnel each day. Paul N. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11/15f2010 A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FMEO 1. JCI still does not have an approved sensor, the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delay. 2. Need flags (tape) for Test and Balance to be up by 11f28f2010. 3. Verify that the maintenance work on AHU and requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 11/29. 4. WMI needs to turn of fire detectors for soldering of pipe assume this has already been coordinated). Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atl a nta, Georgia 30333 Office: amass?sac? Cell: 4o4~azs~sazr Fax: email: From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:07 PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: P2009453 11,113f2010 Construction Meeting Notes Tanya and Charles, The highlights of the meeting are as follows: 1 2. 3 4 9. 10. 11. The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11/18 and will be installed 11/19. JCI needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor. The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 111'24. The wall guards havejust been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wall location. installation can ?nish up during TAB work. The new door arrives 11(19]. Control valves will be onsite on 11f17. The new walls are up and GFR is waiting to paint them until the mortar has dried. Painting can be finished during TAB work. Controller for the reheat coils is on back order but will not delay the project. Flooring installation will smell; notify ARB of when the work is to be done. Piping installation started on 11f15. Bubble tight dampers are installed. However, 12. New balancing dampers are installed. 13. WMI to check on when the new laminated glass for the new wall is to be installed. JCI and GFR did not attend the meeting. The only concern I have at this point is JCL Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ?eece-sac? Cell: 404-325-5327 Fax email: KMossi @cdeg? Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 2010 5:42 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Ce: Probst. Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: RE: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11i15!2010 Karen, Can?t help with items 1 or 2. What needs to be veri?ed regarding maintenance work on AHU and item 3? Item 4 is being handled through .ierrv [contractor] and i am not aware ofanv more tours in the vivarium since last week? Art has been working with contractors and ARE personnel each day. Paul N. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 111152010 A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FMEO l. JCI still does not have an approved sensor, the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delay. 2. Need flags {tape} for Test and Balance to be up by 11123;?2010. 3. Verify that the maintenance work on AHU and requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 11/29. 4. WMI needs to turn of fire detectors for soldering of pipe assume this has already been coordinated]. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 30430?3307 Cell: 404325-6827 Fax: email: From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:0? PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Cc: Moss,r Karen (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Subject: P2009453 11f13/2010 Construction Meeting Notes Tanya and Charles, The highlights of the meeting are as follows10. 11. 12. 13. The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11/18 and will be installed 111?19. JCI needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor. The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 11f24. The wall guards have just been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wail location. However, installation can ?nish up during TAB work. The new door arrives ling}. Control valves will be onsite on 11/13. The new walls are up and GFR is waiting to paint them until the mortar has dried. Painting can he finished during TAB work. Controller for the reheat coils is on back order but will not delay the project. Flooring installation will smell; notify ARE of when the work is to be done. Piping installation started on 11(15. Bubble tight dampers are installed. New balancing dampers are installed. WMI to check on when the new laminated glass for the new wall is to be installed. NJ and GFR did not attend the meeting. The only concern I have at this point isJCl. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: 7T0-433-8307 Cell: 404-325-852? Fax: noses-255? emaild?esl?sdssex Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFW Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2010 4:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Nogueira, William P. Subject: P2009453 Construction Meeting on 11!15i2010 A few items came up that need to be coordinated with FM EO still does not have an approved sensor, the incorrect sensor has come through twice. The sensor is a 3 week lead time - a potential delav. Need ?ags {tape} for Test and Balance to be up by 11,!28!2010. Verify that the maintenance work on AHU and requested by TAB contractor will be done before he starts on 111?29. WMI needs to turn of ?re detectors for soldering of pipe (I assume this has already been coordinated). Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770483-330? Cell: 404-325-682? Fax: email: From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODKBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:0? PM To: Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: P2009453 11,!1312010 Construction Meeting Notes Tanya and Charles, The highlights of the meeting are as follows: 1 2. 3. 4 The access doors for the fan plenum arrives on 11f18 and will be installed 11,!19. needs to resubmit the correct thermostat. There is a 3 week lead time on sensor. The glass has been ordered and should be installed on 11/24. The wall guards have just been ordered and are behind schedule due to the new wall location. However, installation can ?nish up during TAB work. The new door arrives 11f19f. Control valves will be onsite on 11/17. The new walls are up and GFR is waiting to paint them until the mortar has dried. Painting can be ?nished during TAB work. 8. Controller for the reheat coils is on back order but will not delay the project. 9. Flooring installation will smell; notify ARE of when the work is to be done. 10. Piping installation started on 11I15. 11. Bubble tight dampers are installed. 12. New balancing dampers are installed. 13. WMI to check on when the new laminated glass for the new wall is to be installed. JCI and GFR did not attend the meeting. The only concern I have at this point is JCI. Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 WEI-4838367 Cell: 404-825-5827 Fax: T70438-25E7 email: dcaov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) mus; 42 us c. . 262aliFrom-:-- Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:Nogueira, William P. cg: (coololoincezm); Bel?eid, Emanuel {coolocoollsFol (encroccmosnel; Probst, Paul E. Pedone, James (CDCIOCOOIOSEPL Phillips, Roman (CTR Buchheit Wa ne P. Allison ma (alla- a (CDCIO a. Fa: (CDCIDSEL iva?um 'JIbli3} I- I . ou. will be noti?ed when reactivation will be required (anticipated in Jan 2011}. 232a; - Sent using BlackBerry From: Biake.N.Bayless@jci.com To: Noueira William P. (coclocoozsro) Cc: (coc - eel?elcl, Emanuel - (coclocoolosna; Proust, Paul E. (coclocoolsFO); Pedone, James Phillips, Roman Buchheit, Wayne P. 3_ ent: Tue Nov 16 - 3:35 20 I . i-varium .SFnilir-r.-fereed-and propped. door ala rm? fer-FE disabIEd- tbjl3'lz42 us cs - - . Blake Bayless Southeast Security Systems Johnson Controls, Inc. 1350 Northmeadow Parkway Suite 100 Roswell, GA 30076 O: 404.639.1649 blake.n.bayless@jci.com To Blaire.N.Elayless@jci.com. - - essath 11iier2lltoio:13Al-n cc Td. Emanuel so? . "F?robsl. Paul E. {cocrocoolrss I To Blake.N.Bayless@jci.cam .3: a I .Joshua.M.Cunningham@ici.com, (cocrocooroSHEr' . "Prohst. Paul E. (cocrocooraFor 11f?21?201 07:43 AM tb){{bits} Gentlemen, Please get with Paul Nogueira and ?gure out what readers and alarms need to be over ridden etc. and make it so. Wayne Buchheit, RE. Security Systems Engineer To Ellake.N.Bayiess@choom. Joshua.M.Cunningham@joi.corn co "Pedonei James (CDCIOCOUIUSEFF "Nogueira. William ?i bn?. . "Sum edu?Ef. Bldg. Of?ce of Security and Emergency Preparedness Centers for Disease Control Clifton Road 21 IZIIS IMS-AZZ Atlanta, GA 30333 O: 404.639.3131 NOTICE: adum 42 This message and accompanying documents are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521? and contains Sensitive But Unclassi?ed (SBU) information intended for the speci?ed individual(s) - for which disclosure, misuse, alteration or destruction could adversely affect National Security or government interests. If you are not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited, Ifyou have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by E-mail, and delete the original message. . Sent: on av, ovem 'r 01, 2010 2:38 PM To: Hairston-Nash, Diane Buchheit, Wayne P. Pedore James lens: I Cc: Cunningham, Josh OIOSEP) Bevless,r Blake N. CDC OCOO OSEP) . Damon, Inger K. (cocrororuczvso); Singletary Kristi (coercrorriczvso); Zambuto, Laura R. (coercromcrao); Williams, Allison lmrar - ward, William (em) (coprocoorcsas) sled .. Good Afternoon Diane, {mm 4 pies rpose of this e-maii ist that the Of?ce of Hes "1 and m, begun a contamination {decent-oft ivar'um room locate as this week..- 8:252; gll??lliinq ivarium area The OSHE activity will most liker result in mul pie or alarms. After OSHE has completed their decon activities, Buildings and Facilities Of?ce will begin a project on the" air handling system for that area that will cover the period November 1 through most liker January 29, 20.11. During this period there will be no select agent or other animal work in this area. (This only includes select agent areas under the direction ol mus cn the I [h_:l3l42 uscssesninv I Please note that the scope of this projectdoes not include Rooml - during this period under the direction 0 ME: I and lore We will notify you once the air handling modi?cation has been completed and programs resume work in the area. Please feel free to contact us it you have any questions or concerns regarding this e-mail. Sincerely. ibirsi l2 262atl . . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Select Agent Compliance, Roybal Campus rann Pirann Rand NF- Mai 3101;. A42 ih:r3!::12 LI 512.5: 2523m- Mathe, Chester (cocrocoorosep) From: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Sent: Tuesday. November 09, 2010 1:42 PM MSG Raymond. George in" IBFOFYI Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld r= - ndler Geor (coprocooreFo) Toi we Cox, Nancy Meechan, Paul J. (CDCKOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Moss, Karen Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Tanya A. Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Tue Nov 09 13:0}:06 2010 ?lli??ct: BED Con?rmationotEWivarium Occupancy Date a .. . Friends: At the 2 NOV, meeting. I said that BFO would con?rm a occupancy target date for the vivarium of 4 JAN 2011. Based on the ?nal scopeof work and several meetings with the Contractor over the past few days, the revised occupancy target date for the vivarium is 10 JAN 2011. BFO will try and beat that date as we work through the project if at all possible. I hope that this revised target date is still acceptable to Special Pathogens, and OSHE. Thanks for your continued support on this project! G.- Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: To: 42 U5 C. 5} 252301 Cc: Chandler. George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) or 09, 2010 1:07 PM Cox, Nancy Meechan. Paul J. E) Lingler, Arthur R. Moss, Karen Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Tanya A. . Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) ivarium Occupancy Date Friends: At the 2 NOV, meeting, I said that BFO would con?rm a occupancy target date for the Vivarium of 4 JAN 2011. Based on the ?nal scope of work and several meetings with the Contractor over the past few days, the revised occupancy target date for the vivarium is 10 JAN 2011. BFO will try and beat that date as we work through the project if at all possible. i hope that this revised target date is still acceptable to Special Pathogens, LEI and OSHE. Thanks for your continued support on this project! (3.. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler. George Sent: Monda November 08, 2010 3:32 PM To: USE. F3 Cc: Cox, Nancy Meechan. Paul J. Tanya A. Probst. Paul E. Maxwell, James C. Bowen. Ken L. Williams. Jeffery (CDCIOCDOIBFO) ibii3i - . ?2?2?W?Qtsw .. RE. BldgEIVrvanum tbii?i - Thank you very much for the confirmation memo. BFO had a final meeting with the Contractor this morning and writ ash: Tanya to confirm the Contractor?s acceptance of 4 JAN 2011, as the scheduled completion date. Tanya, could you send us a veri?cation email, please? Thank you all for assisting us in wrapping this up quickly! Flying Mam o_Ell . G.- mac 252w (cop/oID/chveo) Sent: Mon av, November 03, 2010 1:45 PM To: Chandler George (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Cc: Meechan,r Paul J. {Ditf? WEE v?ivarlum Project All. As requested, have provided a memo regarding the Nov 2 meeting (attached). Please feel free to distribute to you staff. The project is moving along, with three penetrations for supply air successfully completed (for me the biggest concern), and work on sealing up the door at the West end of the central corridor has been initiated. I am optimistic that the project roceed on schedule. 3523;?? {bii31142 usc ?262aihi it: File: Memo- ivarium-Project?NOVt [lpdf he Eilwic?atb '56: Date From ubject To CC tbji?l 42 SC- ?252arm (b?JiBl 42 US ?2E32Elihj Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH HUMAN SERVICES Memorandum November 8, 2010 Iml3j'42 IQ. 2?zaln: rotor 42 - s-aszam As a follow up to our meeting on November in which the schedule for the Buildinc J'ivaiiummair redirection sending you this memo to touch on wh at was communicated. "Pit assess-? the extra time that was added to the project?s schedule. which would have greatly delayed the return to operation for the Vivarium (potentially as late as mid February). You communicated that BFO had reevaluated the time needed to perform certain elements of the work. and it was determined that the project could be ?nished much earlier. possibly sometime in December. However, a tentative target date of January 4, 2011 was agreed upon by those in attendance as an acceptable date of completion for the project. It was understood that BFO cannot guarantee that the project would not be delayed beyond this date. as unexpected complications could be encountered. ?313]: ?2 emergency use by Division staff it a need should arise before the project is completed and 42 Also addressed in the meeting was the need for a backup plan to provide space for the facility is ready for reoccupation. The area is back in service {from . maintenance}, but may be inadequate to meet the response need. The use di ional Building Vivarium space was proposed as a possible solution, but permission from lh nd Rabies Branch PRE) was needed in order to use their DSAT-registered space. communicated this need to (Chief. FREE), and PRB will not require the use of the suites until mid January. There was some concern that if the space were to become occupied by the Division. the use of the rooms would be lost to PRB. I explained that this would not be the case, and that its use by the Division would be strictly for - 'r emergency response efforts, and the space would revert back to. use by returned to service. It was also noted (by me} that suites could also be utilized for emergency response e?o?icularly if the work required ibiiEJlilE SC - containment conditions than are available in the Buildin .. @26? m} Sincerer mull-12 IJE. L2. gg??alhi Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 1:32 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: Vivarium Scope Spec rev 9-840.de Bill: Attached is seeps as of Sept. 8, 2010. Paul Prebst, PE Asst. Din, Operatiens BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-539-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 coo P2009453 - HVAC MODIFICATIONS FORI SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 010101 Summary of Work 43:13.14: LI 5 Ci ?2528Ihi SECTION 01 0 SUMMARY OF WORK FOR SOLUTION ORDER CONCEPT (SOC) PART GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. This section includes the following: P?Snrhi?i"? Scope of Work. Work by the Government. Government Furnished Products. Contractor use of site and premises. Work Sequence. Government occupancy. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Related sections include the following: Section arson Submirrais Section 0131f Nenvork Anaiysis Schedules Section 01546 - Health and Safety Section 0154? - Personnei Security Requirements Section 01700 Project Cioseout 1.3 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD A. Project Delivery Method: The method of deliverytorthis project is a Solution Order Concept (800). The SOC is characterized by the following elements: I. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI The SOC is a process thatdoes not utilize conventional design services, therebyempowering the Contractor to become very involved in the project's earliest stages. The Contractor, as a team member with CDC, will be expected to provide suggestions, ask questions. and offer potential alternative methods, systems, or products to the Scope of Work (80W) provided by CDC. The SOC process is based on CDC and the Contractor meeting at the site, reaching consensus on the scope, schedule, and cost of the project. confirming all agreements in writing, awarding the contract. and executing the work. Site Visit. The purpose of the site visit is to convey technical objectives for the project (80W) to the Contractor and to be a working meeting that moves the team closer to the final definition of the project's scope. While all systems, materials, and issues may not be selected or settled during this site visit, all known issues should be revealed and discussed. a. Required Attendees: Contractor?s Project Manager and Superintendent; each major trade sub contractor?s Project Manager; CDC Contracting Officer; Citle (andior Project Menagerie), design discipline experts, and Building Manager; program representativefs]; and appropriate support personnel from OHS, ITSO, OSEP, and similar programs. b. A follow up site meeting may be appropriate if additional information or clarification is required. PGO Request for Proposal. After the SOW has been refined, PGO will send the Soiiciration, Offer; and Award document and attachments to the Contractor for pricing. Contractor's Proposal. The Contractor?s proposal includes a schedule, scope, cost, and submittal materials as appropriate and required in the SOW to provide a solution to the requirements defined by the SOW and other components of the Solicitation. The following are technical Revised September 3, 2m 0 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section 01010.2 HVAC MODIFICATIONS FOR flit-42 Summary of Work requirements for the Initial proposal to be submitted to the Contracting Officer {also refer to Section 01300): a. Demonstrate compliance with the 80W. b. Cost for the work and services broken down by building and detailed down to the trade by work activity, number of labor hours, and hourly costs. c. Equipment and material cut sheets, shop drawings, and product data, including MSDS sheets as appropriate. d. Provide alternatives fro consideration by CDC as appropriate. e. Construction schedule of activities. This would include necessary utility outages with duration estimates. B. Technical Evaluation. The technical evaluation by CDC will include, but may not be limited to, the following: . 1. Verification of compliance with the 50W. 2. Acceptance or rejection of Equipment and Materials submittals. 3. Acceptance or rejection of required submittals, shop drawings, samples, and all otherinformation required by the 80W. 4. Evaluation of Construction Activity Schedule. 5. Cost proposal. (3. Award. The criteria for award are contained in the Solicitation, Offer, and Award document and attachments as issues by the Contracting Officer for this project. 1. Upon receipt of the contract, the Contractor shall execute any other non?site specific requirements of the contract, such as ordering items with long lead times, shop fabrication of assemblies, initiation of shop drawings and other submittals processes. update or partial short circuit and coordination study (if required}, and all other activities to insure the project shall be completed according to the project scope, cost, and schedule. D. Notice to Proceed. The information in this paragraph in no way supersedes, negates, or defines the requirements contained in the Solicitation, Offer, and Award document issued by the Contracting Officer for this project. 1. Upon receipt of all requirements in the Solicitation, Offer, and Award document relating to award of Notice to Proceed (NTP), the Contracting Officer will, at the preconstruction meeting with the Contractor. issue the NTP with the following understanding that the Contractor shall do the following activities: a. Proceed with preparation of submittais, shop drawings, project schedule, and other similar requirements in the contract. b. Not be allowed on site until the requirements of Section 054? Personnel Security have been fulfilled for the Contractor's Project Manager and Superintendent. c. Provide the requirements of the Preliminary Outline Schedule in Section 01311 Nenvorlr Analysis Schedules at the preconstruction meeting. d. Commence personnel security process on remaining staff for project. e. Not be allowed to commence work on site until the Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan has been approved by the Contracting Officer. 1.4 DESCRIPTION OF WORK A. The Work of this project comprises certain repairs and improvements to the existing interior of Buildinlocated at Ftoybal campus. These repairs and improvements include, but are not limited to, the following aspects as further defined and described in the Contract Documents: SENSITIVE EIUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION ISBUI Fleviscd September El, 2010 tartar-42 2625ch SENSITIVE UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 - Section 010103 HVAC MODIFICATIONS FOR imam Summary of Work Mechanical 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 1G. 18. 19. 2D. 21. 22. 23. 24. a5. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBUI Tap into the existing 7'2 14 supply ductwork in interstitial space and route new ductwork to new pneumatic phoenix supply valve. Route two 11? round ducts to two new phoenix valves and one 10" round duct to relocated existing phoenix valve. Route to new heating coils. Contractor to field verify ?t and routing of new ductwork with existing conditions. Route all main ductwork as high as possible. Transition from new phoenix valves outlet to 14x12 heating coils. See appendix for attached heating coil selection. Core slab penetrations as shown on floor slab in interstitial space and per architectural and structural requirements. Slab penetration locations to be determined by nondestructive testing. Nondestructive testing to be done on the ?rst day of the lab shut down to verify that no conduit is in the slab at proposed openings. Nondestructive testing to be done under separate CDC contract. Route new 12 12 ductwork from the new phoenix valve through new slab penetrations to new supply air diffusers in the corridor. Provide out of floor fire damper Ruskin Model DIDB20 (Type BC) in interstitial before slab penetration. Install per manufacturer and SMACNA fire damper out of walirfloor installation instructions. Diffusers shall be 12 12; Titus model number SOUHS-SS. Provide gas tight bubble damper at each diffuser. . Re-route fire sprinkler pipe if required. CDC to provide ?As?Built" of sprinkler pipe in the dirty corridor. Tap into existing hot water supply and return pipes and route new 1" pipes to new reheat coils. Provide new hot water two way control valves to match existing control valves at existing heating coils. Provide all associated controls and devices to make a complete supply system. Insulate supply ductwork and hot water pipe. All devices. materials and equipment to match existing unless specified otherwise. Provide missing opposed blade balancing dampers on existing ductwork as identified by baseline Test and Balance Report. Provide new water proof temperature sensor in new wail of dirty corridor to control new heating coils. Provide paintable silicone to seal diffusers in corridor. Remove existing exhaust grille in elevator lobby room 901 to pressurize space and patch per architectural requirements. Demolish existing ductwork and phoenix valve back to main trunk. Re-use existing 8" round phoenix valve. Replace two counterbalanced isolation dampers at I I dampers to be sized and selected by fan manufacturer. Contractor to field verify dimensions before ordering dampers. Replace two low leakage motorized bypass dampers atl democrats be sized and selected by fan manufacturer. Contractor to field verify dimensions before ordering. Provide motor sheaves for fans if required by Test and Balance after construction and during commissioning. Tap into existing exposed elbow and add new stainless steel thermal double wall 12 10 supply ductwork in shower anteroom, route to new 12 12 diffuser; Titus Model number SDORS-SS with opposed blade balancing damper. Contractor to field verify existing conditions for location and fit of ductwork and diffuser. Test and Balance of exhaust and supply systems in the Vivarium to be done under separate contract. ass-arm royal-42 us r; "2825ch Near the end of construction Test and Balance will perform preliminary fan testingi?troubleshootin Repair torn and add missing insulation on ductwork and pipe for all pipe and ductwork related to - - . -- 1 Identify location of plugs forfuture. Seal air leakage at existing six fire dampers located in the interstitial that serves the clean corridors. Revised September 3. 2010 fbjt3lzil2 zeaann . CDC P2009453 - SENSITIVE UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 010104 HVAC MODIFICATIONS FORI me WEE Wee Summary of Work 26. Contractor to provide drawings. 27. Provide shop drawings, and submittals via hard copy and electronically. 28. Contractor shali provide detailed sheet metal and pipe shop drawings for CDC approval. 29. Glass slot size shall be verified with CDC before ordering glass. 30. Fleplace filters in animal holding rooms. .31-.. 32- . Plugtho drains i_n existingjagdpienumbox. 'Atfan pier-torn box provide gasketed ,2 12 assess-sour 'ddoir'handle teases: Door as provide irisual. and physicalassessito backd'raftaampers.. tit-:0 Control Work ($31.42 I 262efhi gro. 1' - M3142 zezarh i (blell'42 9" 252mm i? "On elf-drop in-exhatis'trduct static . i933?; ., Modify existing two position control'darnpers'to a modulating in?urjisgg are existing replaces central demerits coritrolsiuetsfatie pressure: I .DUring tanoperation, BAS oyster-n shall modulate both control dampers located at the roof exhaust plenum in unison to maintain exhaustistatie pressure sslpeint. shall he Company final _m on a fan failure assensed'bysone-ofjthe tyvo cLirrent switchesyan alarm shall besen't'; ExhaUSt plenum; control pampersshali continUe't'd.modulate maintaining exhaust duct static pressure setpointi ?On failure ot=..bcith fans as sensed bxeithemurrent; satisfies ansiarm JS. hail. be; ee_ne_rated'_and2itis associated AHU supply :fanshall stopi Upon drop in exhatrst duct-safetie warning :alannpoint is the point'where?thePhoenix exhaust vavles begin to lose control mien-flow{associated withexhaustiana 5 the-scheduled. airflow as measured by the airflow station an alarm shall be generated; The eontra'ctor will determine theactual low percentage thatrepriesents an egress issue. and that shall stop. Exhaust fansl - . plenum control dampersshall. modulate 'to- maintain a 1.0? (adj) exhaust duct static; If a duct static pannot tie-maintained that allows for a Safe egress .fro'r? thearaa. eas system shall stop. and dampers will modulate. to maintain static setpoin't. 'ISaf'e? egress exhaust duct static pressure will shallbe manually initiates. . ijb}t3_i 42 G. I 2825013 (NH) 42 Li 2625.ch .. BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) Existing wiejnsai?eane?s.erases? 1 open supply-ran _failure'the the exhaust fan control maintain a 1" 13'" (adj duct static set'pqiet is .be Set by the [secontractor air. flea: Architectural "1 Remove door and fill opening with concrete masonry. Finish wall with epoxy paint. 2. Provide new window in new infill wall. 3. Provide new concrete masonry wall in Conldorl:l.~ install new automaticopening door in new masonry wall. Install metal wall guards at masonry wall. Finish wall with epoxy paint. Revised September 3. 2010 assessing . exhaust. (errata: as. -- seam-m (strata: so - Maya? us cg 2695th tblt3l'42 '5 - ESEBEW SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 - Section 010105 HVAC MODIFICATIONS FOR *2 U5 5 item" Summary of Work 4. Remove existing directional airflow 'ping-pong' indicator devices from approximately 33 doors. Install manufacturer supplied caps to resulting penetrations in walls. Provide new rubber door sweepsfbotloms to approximately 12 doors. 5. Remove existing vision glass from approximately 30 doors. Replace with new glass sized to leave air gaps in doors. 6. Provide new full gasket sets to three sets ot doors. Resulting door assemblies to seal to gas-tight condition when closed. Paint the ceiling bays at each new slab penetration in Corridor With WORK BY THE GOVERNMENT A. The Government has a direct contract with the test and balance firm. CDC will also decontaminate the area prior to commencement of work in the animal area and after completion of work. No other work by CDC is anticipated for this Project. 1.5 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PRODUCTS A. No products or materials will be furnished by the Government forthis Project- 1.6 CONTRACTOR USE OF SITE AND PREMISES A. D. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSJFIED Limit use of site and premises to allow: 1. Regular and continued use of, and access to, immediate area around Buildings 15, 16, 18, 21, and 23, adjacent walkways and CDC parking area. Construction Operations: Limit construction operations to the areas noted on drawings. Government security at CDC facilities requires that the Contractor and all agents rem aln in the area designated by the limit of work in the Contract Documents. Failure to observe this requirement is grounds for dismissal of the offending party. Repeated violations may be grounds for dismissal of the Contractor, or agent at fault, or both. 1. Contractors on exterior projects shall not be allowed access to the interior of any CDC building, except to perform work scheduled in an interior space. Time Restrictions for Performing Work: All Work which cannot be performed during normal duty hours shall require the Contractorto submit a schedule of anticipated Work to the Contracting Officer prior to execution of the Work. This includes utility outages, work on Federal holidays, and other activities. Known activities include the following: 1 . Utility Outages and Shutdown: The Contractor shall arrange with the Contracting Officer. Utility outages and associated work shall be scheduled from 6:00 pm to 5:00 am, Monday through Thursday, or 5:00 pm, Friday, to 6:00 am, Monday. The Contractor shall request such outages a minimum of 10 days prior to shutdown. There shall be no exceptions to the 10 day minimum requirement. 2. Work on Weekends, Federal holidays and other requests: The Contractor shall arrange with the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall provide such request a minimum of 5 days prior to scheduled Work. Site Conditions: The Contractor, shall upon completion of the Work, repair, alter, remove, andfor replace exterior materials to conform to each material's condition prior to commencement at work. Revised September 8, 2010 turrets: so. .3 asaarhi SENSITWE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 - Section 010106 HVAC MODIFICATIONS F0 onerous: ems-It.- Summary of Work E. Project Cleanup and Closeout. An amount equal to 10% of the contract amount, including all modifications, will be held by the Contracting Officer until all project cleanup and closeout requirements have been performed by the Contractor and acceptable to the Contracting Officer. 1. Project cleanup and closeout issues that the Contractor shall be responsible forinclude, but are not limited to, the following: a) Removal of all debris, excess materials, and equipment brought on site by the Contractor or any agent of the Contractor. b] Ftemoval, replacement, or refurbishment as required of all Government utilities used during execution of the work. c) Submission and resubmission it required, of all closeout documents required by this project. These include resolution of final inspection listing. operating and maintenance manuals, staff training, warranty information, as-built documents, and others as listed in the relevant specification sections. 2. Prior to Final Acceptance, the Contractor shall request a review of these issues by the Contracting Officer. Upon successful completion of the review, and when all defective issues have been resolved to the satisfaction of the Contracting Officer, the affected funds will be released. Limit use of site and premises to allow: 1. Government occupancy of the building. 2. Use of site and adjacent spaces by the Government and the public for normal daily operations and functions. GOVERNMENT (USER) OCCUPANCY A. People (CDC employeesfvisitorsj in Building 18 will occupy its premises, including but not limited to the project area, during the entire period of construction. Contractor is to keep in consideration the access and egress needs of these occupants. B. Cooperate with the Government, represented by the Contracting Officer, to minimize conflict, and to facilitate the daily operations of Building 18 as well as other buildings and facilities on the Boybal Campus. C. Schedule the Work to accommodate this requirement. 1.8 DOCUMENT SECURITY A. Document security is important tothe Government. The documents provided to youin any format are sensitive and you must take provisions to protect the confidentiality of the information. The requirements below are intended to supplement CDC's current documents security policy. By acceptance of any printed or electronic documents, you agree to the following: 1. The documents shall not be transmitted to a third party without written permission of the Contracting Officer. Referto Part 2 of this specification section forthe Document Tracking Log. 2. All documents shall be returned at the conclusion of the project. No documents shall be keptfor any purpose by you, your firm, or any of your subcontractors, suppliers, or agents. Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. 3. All electronic files shall be deleted from storage devices (computers, zip drives, hand held devices, and such). Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. 4. All CDIDVD and magnetic disk shall be returned to the Contracting Officer. Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFJED INFORMATION iseut Revised Septembers, 2010 SENSITIVE UNCLASSIFIED ENFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 - Section 01010? HVAC MODIFICATIONS '?iiz?iizi's'i? @252? I Summary of Work 5. All devices that contain electronic information shall be protected by password. 6. All printed documents shalt be stored in a secure area until returned to the Contracting Officer. Return of all required documents and media shall be part of the project's completion and closeout requirements. and shall be satisfactorily completed prior to approval of final invoice. A. interior: The foIIowing is a brief description of Government use of the site that may have varying effects on the execution of the Work required under this contract. 1. The requirements and demands for Government operations. schedules. and programs in Building 18 will continue to occur throughout the construction period. Response to . these requirements and demands will be met by the Government in spaces adjacent to the i project area. Therefo re. it is very critical that construction activities for this project, including workers, equipment, and materials. have minimal potential for disruption to Government activities in the spaces adjacent to the project location. Notify and coordinate with project officer when interior occupants could be affected by exterior work activities. 1.9 GOVERNMENT USE OF THE SITE i i B. Exterior: The following is a brief description of Government use of the site that may have varying effects on the execution of the Work required under this contract. 1. The operation and function of the adjacent buildings and spaces will continue during the construction period of this project. Pedestrians, vehicles, equipment. and goods will continue to be present in adjacent exterior spaces to the construction site. 2. A schedule of Contractor vehicular movement of dumpsters, deliveries, and other similar issues shall be provided to the Contracting Officer for approval to maintain safety and minimize disruptions and conflicts to all parties. Activities concerning placement of dumpsters and storage a removal of hazardous materials, will only be executed after guidance from the Project Officer. 3. The Contractor shall provide a delivery schedule of all equipment and materials to the Contracting Officer at least to calendar days prior to the earliest scheduled delivery that requires the use of the loading dock. The Contracting Officer will coordinate Government use of the loading dock with Contractor requests and accommodate such requests to the greatest extent possible. 1.1 Ci CONTRACTOR ACTIONS UPON NOTICE OF CONTRACT AWARD A. The information in this paragraph in no way supersedes, negates. or de?nes the requirements contained in the Contract. Unless othelwise specifically addressed with different requirements in the Contract terms and conditions, the Contractor shall immediately initiate the following actions upon receipt of the Notice of Award: 1. Fulfill requirements of Section 0154?r Personnei Security Requirements for the Contractor=s Superintendent and Project Manager. The Contractor will not be allowed on site until these requirements are met. The Government will not be responsible nor liable for any delays to the Work for the Contractor's inability or failure to obtain timely clearances or suf?cient numbers of cleared personnel. 2. Prepare and submit to the Contracting Officer the required Comprehensive Health and Safety Pian. The Contractor will not be allowed to commence work on site until the Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan has been approved by the Contracting Of?cer. Any delays caused by the Contractor's failure to obtain an approved Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan shall be attributed to the Contractor and shall not be considered an excusable delay. 3. Take action and complete all effort necessary to produce and present the Preliminary Outline SENSITIVE UNCLASSIFIED Ftevised September 8. act it SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEIU) CDC P2009453 - Section 010108 HVAC MODIFICATIONS FOHI were Lise-52mm Summary of Work Schedule in 0131 3' Network Analysis Schedules at the preconstruction meeting. The Contractor shall be considered delinquent in pedormance if these documents are not ready for presentation at the preconstruclion meeting. Commence personnel security process on project's workers. Proceed with preparation of submitlais, shop drawings. and other similar requirements of the contract. 6. Anticipate receiving formal Notice to Proceed from the Contracting Olficer within 23 calendar days alter Notice of Award. It is customary, but not required, for the Contracting Officer to issue Notice to Proceed at the preconstruction meeting. PART 2 PRODUCTS A. DocumentTracking Log. Attachment is the form to be used upon approval by the Contracting Officer of request to provide documents to a third party. TEM PLATE - ocument Tracking L. PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFOFI MATIUN Revised September B. 2010 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEF) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 8:53 AM To: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) oc: Howard, William (Bill) Stotz, Rudolph (cocrocoorOSi-IE) Subject: Vivarium HEPA Filters Art: The Safety Of?ce needs to decontaminate and recertify the HEPA Filter caissons located in the interstitial space before programs re-occupy the labs. The decontamination of the units is an approximate two day effort. No one can be in the Vivarium space when the HEPA decontamination takes place. OSHE respectfully requests that they be pro-activelyl be made aware of the schedule and breaks that occur such that no contractors are planned to be in the space for even as short as one day so that can perform their work. Please maintain contact with Bill Howard as necessary. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Din, Operations BFOfFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 3:43 PM To: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Nogueira, William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Door Closer Okay, Test and Balance is currently scheduled to start work 11f24/ I will keep you posted on schedule. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgie-30333 Of?ce: 7T0-488-330T Cell: 11104-825632? Fax: email: KMossl From: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOKBFO) (CTR) Sent: Friday, Nov?mber 05, 2010 3:41 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Nogueira, William P. Moss, Karen Subject: RE: Door Closer The exhaust fans and AHU are off right now and the door is closing properly. Once -l can turn 'on the HVAC system I will make adjustments to the door. Roman From: Probst, Paul. E.. Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 1:57 PM To: Phillips, Roman (CTR) Cc: Nogueira, William P. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Subject: FW: Door Closer Roman: Can you take care of this? Thanks, Paul 404639-05 05 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 PM To: Prob-st, Paul E. (cocrocooxBFO) Subject: FW: Door Closer 0: File: Door to ?it-42 3'3. Paul,r see email ?all can we get this door closer fixed before we start Test and Balance? _jpg File: door to ZJFIE Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 773435-3307 Cell: 404-325-6327 Fax: email: From: Tyler, John Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 12:56 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Door Closer Not necessarily. It could be adjusted for more closing force and/or a greater movement distance. It would only need to be replaced if the cylinder leaks (even then it could probava be repaired). From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 12:46 PM To: Tyler, John Subject: Door Closer John, . See attached picture of door to dirty corridor from the shower anteroom, the door would not stay closed, does this mean the door closer needs to be replaced? Karen File: Door to Mechanical Engineer - - 2.}pg oss P.E. Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atianta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ?T0-488+33i1? Cell: 404625-682? Fax: email: I (azcdcaov Marthe, Chester From: Phillips, Roman (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Sent: Friday, November 05. 2010 3:41 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ- Cc: Nogoeira, William P. Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Door Closer The exhaust fans and AHU are off right now and the door is closing properly. Once I can turn on the HVAC system I will make adjustments to the door. Roman From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 1:5? PM To: Phillips, Roman (coo/ocoofaFO) (CTR) Cc: Nogueina, William P. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Door Closer Roman: Can you take care of this? Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOXBFO) Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 1:07 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOZBFO) Subject: FW: Door Closer ee-s?s File: door'to lips Paul, See e-mail trail below, can we get this door closer fixed before we start Test and Balance? Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-97 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ??0-430-830? Cell: masses-see? Fax: 770438-265? em ail: Mssj?qggox From: Tyler, John (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 12:56 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOCIXBFO) Subject: RE: Door Closer Not necessarily. It could be adjusted for more closing force andfor a greater movement distance. it would only need to be replaced if the cylinder leaks (even then it could probava be repaired}. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 12:45 PM To: Tyler, John Subject: Door Closer John, See attached picture of door to dirty corridor from the shower anteroom, the door would not stay closed, does this mean the door closer needs to be replaced? . . 5 giggim?aii??w mm File: door to "2Jpg 053 RE $31,132 ?3 JItll'e't'm'anical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 O?ioe: mass-sac? Cell: cum?assess? F'ax: mass-ass? em ail: Krvinssl @dcgov Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Frida November 05, 2010 1:46 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCDOIOSHE) Subject: FW: Vivarium Project This could be a huge UNKNOWN. Thanks, Paul . (blt3i'42 LI SC 2.5.2.5.(111 404-639-0505 . From: Sent: Friday, November 05, 12:15 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Subject: Re: Vivarium Project PaulI We haven't received any requirements from DSAT yet for reoccupancy. I'll let you know if we receive any requirements. JOSHE will need to provide approval for our purposes. (Dita.- Sent using BlackBerry From: Probst, Paul E. - gagged? Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Fri Nov 05 2010 Subject: RE: Vivarium Project (me; 42 us c. 23221:: '1 Will there be anything required from DSAT to reoccupv the Vivarium? Thanks, Paul 4046390505 Sg??ilj?dr? Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:33 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: Vivarium Project Thank you, Paul, I have noti?ed DSAT of the project. I appreciate the update. (.3. Sent using BlackBerry (bll3l' 2623i MM 5% E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) zezatm .. Sent: Tue Not.' 02 15:24:58 2010 Subject: Vivarium Project 262ai I?d use. The contractor will begin work on the Vivarium project tomorrow. and we expect to turn the facility back over for Program use on January 4. 2011. Of course. things happen that are not always foreseen. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Din, Operations Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 13% Mathe, Chester From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday. November 05, 2010 1:0? PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFD) Subject: FW: Door Closer I a See e-mail trail below, can we get this door closer fixed before we start Test and Balance? Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-325-682? Fax: ??0430-255? email: MM From: Tyler, John Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 12:56 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Door Closer Not necessarily. It could be adjusted for more closing force and/or a greater movement distance. It would only need to be replaced if the cylinder leaks [even then it could probably be repaired]. From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 12:46 PM To: Tyler, John Subject: Door Closer John, of door- to from the shower anteroom, the door would not stay closed, does this 2625ih was as. Eii.e;.ooer..tjpy as are: door to sag was-sea 2ezarh mean the door closer needs to be replaced? (allele uses I . . 2.5km}, Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Ciiftan Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 404-325?552? Fax: 770-438-2557 emit: Mosslr??c; Page 2189 USE. 262a{h} Page 2190 use. 252mm Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Est; Sent: lay. PM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: Re; Vivarium Project Paul, We haven't received any requirements from DSAT yet for reoccupancy. I'll let you know if we receive any requirements. OSHE will need to provide approval for our purposes. 252m Sent using BlackBerry Fro Probst Paul ?31. Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Fri Nov 05 12:02:45 2010 Subject: RE: Vivarium Project (bit3i. 2 us org 26250] -- Will there be anything required from DSAT to reoccupv the Vivarium? Thanks, Paul 4 011-639-0505 Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:33 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: Vivarium Project Sent using BlackBerry cg bra EEOC. . (CDCIOCOOIBFO) sewn: - . .. Sent: Tue Nov 02 15:24:58 2010 Subject: Vivarium Project revs; 420 252a The contractor will begin work on the Vivarium project tomorrow. and we expect to turn the facility back over for Program use on January 4, 2011. Of course, things happen that are not always foreseen. Paul Probst. PE Asst. Dir., Operations Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) I Sent: n. r05,201012:03 PM -- Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Subject: RE: Vivarium Project t'b'rtEt 42 :3 2523 Will there be anything required from DSAT to reoccupy the Vivarium? Thanks, Paul 4 04639?0505 Sent: Tuesay, Novemer 02, 2010 3:33 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium Project Thank you. Paul. I have noti?ed DSAT of the project. I appreciate the update. Regards. {one}. 2 at: a} 262ath - Sent using BlackElerry? From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) gaggmre- Sent: Tue Nov 02 15:24:53 2010 Subject: Vivarium Project (MG: 2 LI 3 28250] -- The contractor will begin work on the Vivarium project tomorrow, and we expect to turn the facility back over for Program use on January,r 4. 2011. Of course, things happen that are not always foreseen. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Din, Operations BFOl'FaciIities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404639-0505 Celt: 404285-2550 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOGOOIOSEP) From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 11:59 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: Vivarium Project imitate c. 5, 262ath think: that will be required from DSAT to reoccupv the Vivarium?" The sooner that we ask her, the more time we will have to deal with any issues. From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 11:50 AM To: Howard, William (Bill) Subject: RE: Vivarium Project . Any question presented needs to be carefully phrased. We do not want to invite anything that has the possibility of creating more schedule andfor would otherwise not be required. . Le. ?give me an inspection, please" may not be in our best interests Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 1 From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 11:4? AM To: Probst, Paul E. (coefocoorero); Subject: RE: Vivarium Project I think that we should know for sure if they will require an inspection or ifsending them documentation of the changes will be sufficient. If we have to wait on them, it will signi?cantly delay schedules.- From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 11:44 AM To: mrcocrocooiosaci; Howard, William (Bill) {cocrocoorowa Subject: FW: Vivarium Project tb}t3}.42 c. Contact to con?rm if DSAT desires a completion inspection? Thanks, {bite-42 us :3 Paul gegamp 9 404-839-0505 Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:33 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium Project Thank you, Paul, I have notified DSAT of the project. i appreciate the update. Regards, 1 a 262a1 . Sent using Bled-(Berry (CDCIOCOOXBFO) 24:58 2010 Subject: l?Vivarium Project ions}. 2 a r: 5; 2?2ail] . The contractor will begin work on the Vivarium project tomorrow, and we expect to turn the facility back over for Program use on January 4, 2011. Of course, things happen that are not always foreseen. Paul Probet, PE Asst. Din, Operations BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 11:50 AM To: Howard, William (Bill) Subject: RE: Vivarium Project (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Any question presented needs to be carefully phrased. We do not want to invite anything that has the possibility of creating more schedule andior would otherwise not be required. i.e. - ?give me an inspection, please" may not be in our best interests Thanks. Paul 4o4-ssaosos From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOXOSHE) Sent: Friday, November 05,, 2010 11:4? AM To: Probst, Paul E. (cocmcooxsso); Subject: RE: Vivarium Project I think that we should know for sure if they will require an inspection or if sending them documentation of the changes will be sufficient. If we have to wait on them, it will significantly delay schedules. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Frida November 05, 2010 11:44 AM To: (cowocooxosus); Howard, William (Bill) (coo/ocooiosHE) Subject: FW: Vivarium Project 1311 to con?rm if DSAT desires a completion inspection? Thanks. Paul ibjlt3} 42 see 262a{h] . From: (C LSPP PO) Sent: Tuesday, Novemoer 02,. 2010 3:33 PM To: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium Project Thank you, Paul, I have notified DSAT ofthe project. I appreciate the update. Re ards tibiiS?l' BSEafh, .- Sent using BiackBerry I I sigma. (bllS?J 2628i Sent: Tue Nov 02 15:24:58 2010 Subject: Vivarium Project i. The contractor will begin work on the Vivarium project tomorrow, and we expect to turn the facility back over for Program use on January 4, 2011. Of course, things happen that are not always foreseen. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Din. Operations BFOi'Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404?639?0505 Cell: 404?285-2550 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 11:47 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIOSHE) Subject: RE: lv'ivarium Project think that we should know for sure if they will require an inspection or if sending them documentation of the changes will be suf?cient. If we have to wait on them, it will signi?cantly delay schedules. From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOGIBFO) Sent: Frida November 05, 2010 11:44 AM To: mm Howard, William (Bill) Subject: FW: Vivarium Project (mat cause . . . . . 25mm -. prudenttocontact to con?rm It DSAT desires a completion Inspection? Thanks, {bjt31?42 uc?c a a UJ 262mm :2 tbit312 us (3 404-539-0505 From: Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:33 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDQOCOOIBFD) Subject: Re: Vivarium Project Thank you, Paul, I have noti?ed DSAT of the project. I appreciate the update. Regards, 252301,] - Sent using BlackBerry FroM' Paul E. hi 3-- .. gsgag?a, s. Sent: Tue Nov 02 15:24:58 2010 tblt3l 26230 Subject: Vivarium Project muses The contractor will begin work on the Vivarium project tomorrow, and we expect to turn the back over for Program use on January 4, 2011. Of course, things happen that are not always foreseen. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir., Operations Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Mathe, Chester From: Probstr Paul E. Sent: Fridajg! November 05, 2010 11:44 AM To: ?At-"sigma Eaf'ick Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: FW: Project zsga'th. contact to con?rm If DSAT desires a completion inspection? Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:33 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: Vivarium Project Thank you, Paul, I have noti?ed DSAT of the project. I appreciate the update. Regards. we: steam -- Sent using BlackBerry I I From: Probst Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) ?Sent: Tue Nov 02 15:24:58 2010 Subject: Vivarium Project osc? sszarh - The contractor will begin work on the Vivarium project tomorrow, and we expect to turn the facility back over for Program use on January 4, 201 Of course. things happen that are not always foreseen. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir, Operations BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Nogueira. William P. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:03 AM To: ake.N.Ba less@joi.oom' Cc: Probst. Paul E. Pedone, James Buohheit, Wayne P. Probst, Paul E. Phillips, Roman Bei?eld. Emanuel .. .. Thanks From: Blake.N.Bayless@jci.com Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 10:47 AM To: make?! 25a less@jci.com Cc: ?Jim'- Joshua.M.Cunningham@jCi.com; itiogueira,r William P. Probst, PauI E. (cocrocoorBFO); Pedona, James (cocrocooroSEP); Buchheit, Wayne P. (CDCIOCOO DEEP) As of 10:45am. 11MI1 U, alarm input 3 for terminal 09902 is now disabled. As mentioned below. please let us know when to re-enable point for alarm monitoring. Blake Bayless Southeast Security Systems Johnson Controls, Inc. 1350 Northmeadow Parkway' Suite 100 Roswell, GA SOOTB O: 404.639.1649 ibli?l C: -- Blake ohnson_Controls TD . 1 mmam p_ bnaawc?ow . .. . .. oc (socrolomoeoolo 5 I .. II harn@jci.corn. "Probst, Paul E. "Pedone. James "Bushheil. Wayne (oocrocoorosasr b2 cooeov: 11rozrao1o 03:54 PM As of 3:30pm, 1112MB. the FORCED and PROPPED door alarms are disabled for the following r'bll31'12 :3 262a . (bits; 42 262al .1 Cardholders will still need their badges to access these terminals. ?*Please Note: You will need to notify us when the points can be re-activated after decon Is completed. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns, Blake Bayless Southeast Security Systems Johnson Controls. Inc. 1350 Northmeadow Parkway Suite 100 Roswell, GA 30076 O: 404.639.1649 one blake.n.bayless@jci.com - To Blake.N.Baytess@jci.com. "Buchheit. Wayne P. {cosiocooiosspv 1002:2010 02:56 PM cc Joshua.M.Cunningha "Fedonc. James 'Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO 252mm BlakeI - arding the big Dvivarium. Since. theraag 42 a c. morning. Completion ofwork may be February if not sooner. Thanks Paul From: Blake.N.Bayless@jci.com Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 12:28 PM To: Buchheit, Wayne P. (CDCIOCOOJOSEP) mg William P. Pedone, James (CDCJOCOOIOSEP) . Vivarium; Paul. I just left you a voice mail with regards to the email below. Feel free to email a list of terminals or we can discuss it over the phone. which ever is more convenient for you. When requested modi?cations are made, I will follow-up with an email of what actions were taken. We will need to be noti?ed when the decon is completed and alarm monitoring needs to be reactivated. 2 lblt?l Thank you for your cooperation, Blake Bayless Southeast Security Systems Johnson Controls, Inn. 1350 Northmeadow Parkway Suite ?100 Roswell. GA 30076 D: I: bloke.n.bayless@joi.com as. "Euchheit. Wayne P. To Blake.N.Bayless@jci.com. Joshua.M.Cunningham@jcl.com ?gamma WEB AM so "Pedone. James "Nogueira. William P. {enema so. tenants _u 252mm .. Sunset Vivarium. GentlemenI Please get with Paul Nogueira and ?gure out what readers and alarms need to be over ridden etc. and make it so. Wayne Buehheit, P.E. Security Systems Engineer Of?ce of Security and Emergency Preparedness Centers for Disease Control 1600 Clifton Road 21 1'21 18 Atlanta, GA 30333 O: 404.639.3181 C: Lh?n?; NOTICE: This message and accompanying documents are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521? and contains Sensitive But Unclassi?ed (SBU) information intended for the speci?ed individual(s) - for which disclosure, misuse, alteration or destruction could adversely affect National Security or government interests. If you are not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby noti?ed that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Ifyou have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by E-mail, and delete the original message. From: lt-zb?-lgiliglf 3?3 Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 2:38 PM To: Hairston-Nash, Diane Buchheit, Wayne P. Pedone, James (cocrocoorosern) Cc: Cunningham, Josh DC ocoo OSEP cm); Bayless, Blake N. cocrocoo OSEP) wra- - (cocrocooxosne ma ry Meadows Kristi (cocroromczveo); Zambuto, Laura R. (Chomp/homo); . [we comm- Hnu ard, William (Bill) (cocrocoo/oSHE) Good Afternoo he purpose of this e-mail is to that the Of?ce of Health, Safety. and Environment has begun a .Bhtamination Mvar' located on thel Ithis week. There is on in-thel Mvarium area The OSHE activity will most likely result in multiple oor alarms. After OSHE has completed their decon activities, Buildings and Facilities Of?ce will begin a project on the air handiing system for that area that will cover the period November 1 through most likely January 29. 2011. During this period ther 0 her animal work in this area. (This only includes select agent areas under the direction of ME. Ion the I Please note that the scope of this project does not includem in Build tinues full operation during this period under the direction of runs: and mm. We will notify you once the air handling modi?cation has been completed and programs resume work in the area. Please feel free to contact us it you have any questions or concerns regarding this e-mail. {bj?a?l'?m C. Sincerely, 252mm . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Select Agent Compliance, Roybal Campus 1500 Clifton Road. NE, Mail Stop A422 ilJ'iE'iiZ' Ll ELC. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Gordon Verwers sgordon@verwers.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 2:35 PM To: Moss, Karen Blanchard. Thomas M. Daniels, Charles E. Probst, Paul E. Raymond. George Subject: Cancelled: P2009453 Controls Meeting Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: To: Su bj ect: Gordon Verwers Wednesday, November 03, 2010 2:36 PM Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Daniels. Charles E. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Cancelled: P2009453 Controls Meeting Mathe, Chester i From: Cox, Nancy Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 4:40 PM To: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOJBFO Meechan, Paul J. Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. Shaw, Michael Katz, Jackie M. (CDCIOIDINCIRD) Cc: Willi Mawle, Alison (CDCIOJDINCIRD) Subject: [bif3t42L'S-C n'c'a ?mp Project Thanks to all forthe productive meeting today. Nancy Nancy J. Cox, Director, Influenza Division Director, WHO Collaborating Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology and Control of Influenza National Centerfor Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Phone: 404-639?1279 e-mail: ncox@cdc.gov From: Chandler, George Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 4:31 PM Meechan, Paul J. . Probst, Paul E. Cox, Nancy Shaw, Michael Kat, Jackie M. NCIRD) Cc: Williams, efferv Mawle, Alison (CDCIOIDINCIRD) subject: RE: ra:r.3::42 use. 252mm Project Thanks, BFO will confirm schedule by Thursday, as we discussed today, and looks fonrvard to completing the back? up space plan next week. GI- From: ingraratz use ?2523[h} Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 2:32 PM To: Chandler, George (cocrocoorero); Meechan, Paul J. .. (CDC/ocoorosas); Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. Cox, Nancy Shaw, Michael Kalz, Jackie M. Cc: Willia Mawle, Alison Subject: reject i?biE? .42 LIE C. 252mm Spoke with regarding thei space, and she needs to speak to her staff regarding some follow up animal studies. She did not think that there was a need for the space before the Jan 4 date (and perhaps after?), but I All, I . . I 1 she needed to con?rm this [she Will let me know by Monday meeting). 1 will work on coy-needs far - space that the ivision might have (prior to the return to service of th 3 5 42 C: ibjtitj 49 ?gamma ?aftinga memo outlirinn hat was discu 4- I -- v?s meeting, and 2) a plan to addressfmeetany poter Mel-g Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, George (CDCJOCOOIBFD) Sent: Tuesda November 02, 2010 4:31 PM To: Meechan, Paul .1. lcocrocooiosnei; - - - - creel-1E); Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. rcocrococreFO); Cox. Nancy Shaw, Michael Katz, Jackie M. (CDCIOIDINCIRD) Cc: Will coo ccooraFO}; Mawle. Alison (CDCJOIDJNCIRD) Subject: 2B2ar 1i Project Thanks,l BFO will con?rm schedule by Thursday, as we discussed today, and looks forward to completing the back- up space plan next week. GI- From] this:- Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 2:32 PM To: Chandler, George Meechan, Paul J. Howard, William (Bill) Prohst, Paul E. {CDC/ocooraFO); Cox, Nancy (cocrom/NCIRD); Shaw, Michael Kalz, Jackie M. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Mawle, Alison (CDCIOIDINCIRD) subject? ionsms use. ?262alhi I Project All, - Spoke wit regarding their_ pace. and she needs to speak to her staff regarding some follow up animal studies. She did not think that there was a need for the space before the Jan 4 date {and perhaps but she needed to con?rm this {she will let me know by Monday meeting). i will work on drafting a memo outlinin - 1 what was discus" y's meeting, and 2) a plan to addressi'rneei any potential pace that the .l ivision might have (prior to the return to service of the 18 i'l 525 2arl1'l Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) .. .. (cocros ELSILS PP 232a?ms'?'?t': Tuesday. November 02, 2010 3:33 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (cocroccoreFO) Subject: RE: . Froject Thank you, Paul, I have noti?ed DSAT of the project. I appreciate the update. Regards. ?31(3) 42 US 5} 252a I I. Sent using BlackBerry From: Probst Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tue Nov'02 15:24:58 2010 (bus). 2 use. The contractor will begin work on throject tomorrow, and we expect to turn the facility back over for Program use on January 4, 2011. Of course, things happen that are not always foreseen. Paul Probst, PE Asst Dir., Operations BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 4046390505 Cell: 404-285-2580 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Tuesda November 02, 2010 3:25 PM Sent .. .. . at gobiect: W- . Project . 2 5 C. 255:: The contractor will begin work on th project tomorrow, and we expect to turn the facility back over for Program use on January 4. 2011. Of course. things happen that are not always foreseen. Paul Probst, PE Asst. DEL, Operations BFOIFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Celt: 404-285-2560 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: To: Go: Subject: All, to 131242 LLSC. 262mm- Tuesday, November 02, 2010 2:32 PM Chandler, George rcocrocoorsFO}; Paul J. (cocrocoorOSHE); (cocrocooroSHE); Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocoorQSHE); Probst. Paul E. (cocrocoorsFO); Cox, Nancy Shaw. Michael Kalz, Jackie M. (coorOIorNCIRo) Mawle, Alison (coerciomcmo) Project Ibh3ii-12 IJ.S.C 252.3th- Spoke with 'bil?i regarding their space, and she needs to speak to her staff regarding some follow up animal studies. She did not think that there was a need for the space before the Jan 4 date (and perhaps after?). but she needed to con?rm this (she will let me know by Monday meeting]. I will work on drafting a memo outlining 1} what was discussed in today?s meeting, and 2} a plan to addresslmeet any potential emergenc needs [Dalila-Ind for : that the In?uenza Division might have (prior to the return to service of the (aim-42 US (3 ZEZafh'i Mathe, Chester From: Bel?ower, Craig Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 1:45 PM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. CDCIOCC ole. Kenneth K. Subject: Building and Sequence Please see the attached sequences forl @252?: have reviewed the programming for both systems and made changes to sequences to re?ect the current state of the controls. After reviewing of the current programming of the mtg-noose 5.252.341; recommends that the current sequence of operation in place should not be mocmeo. Craig Bel?ower I inns-:42 uses 252%: I Sequencedocx Sequencedocx EIEICINVWWOU HIV CINV 3H.L 33V HLDEI HIV 3H1. 38013 3HJ. SI N?s?d NO AWNO 'S?i?s?l?S ONES-033B HEEWFIN SI 3HJ. CIan 30 3H1. 3HJ. :lOlS OJ. 313V 38 .LON TIIM 3HJ. .LNEIS NEH 3HJ. OJ. 3H1. DJ. 38 ND 300W Ol??s" HO UNVH NI SNVA 3Hi DJ. 3199' .LON SI NVJ 3HJ. EHJ. EIGIHHEIAU SNEWEHH BNIHHCI 33010 HIV acnsmo 3H.L CINV NMOU J.an H103 3GIBH3AD '30 NO N3UIHHEAD 33 0.1. 3H1 EDA NV SAW TIIM 3GIHHEAO 3H1. 13N'u'd 3GIHH3AO SNEWEHH 3HJ. ELL CEILVH3N39 TIIM N?e? NH EDA M0133 HG 3AOEIV S3318 EEHSS3HCI OILVLS 1ND N31d AI OJ. 3HJ. NHMEH DJ. 30 1.3833 3H.L CLL 3?3 NV .LFICI 0334301 33 NEH 3H1 AB 033N219 8V HEN-INA NEH NV NOdn OJ. U3LVH3N39 NV OI NVHL 330W Oink! 3H1. :10 SI HOLIMS 3H1. :ll {$2393 .. . . .. .HOJJMS V-OIH NO C)an 038010 WIWDN VIA runs as swans 103mm H3dW?u?? OJ. as smuas nsA 'J.cl3 3H.I. NI CI3d d SI .m-u ass :10 asnssasd an; AB aanosmos sv Las 01 mass saawss IAN aaIsmo as; aaWA mamas ass 3H1 01 A0 5301 NO mass: 3 sn I WA Wm] m?maav_psw 111M mom-anon SIHJ. 'N3d0 um 01. as TNHs sw acnsmo sW sadwvu 01 anmmoo NI SI so mama SW .le .LNEIAE 3HJ. NI 01 saszwos as 3H.1. summon 111M wsws'a'sia AB sasou sow Iona A?Iddns 3H1 NI snows NOdn 5.5; wsusosw 103mm so 01 sasmo {aid} wssamI amousososd NOIAOV ?Iosmoo asnssasd DILVLS IanHxa 3H1 "l3f?u3?l asnssasd sums saslnuas .Lv auoz 3H.L 01 HIV astsmo 3Hi cu. anNImoo WM CIW sadwsa NOIJJSOI-J OMJ. 3H1. asms ?asnssasd onus WA asnsvaw Inc-mom AH SI so WA awe N3HM '1ana1 asnssasd onus uaslnsas ENOZ 3HJ. cu sw acnsmo aiwnsow Wm NI 0W sadwva 0M1 N3d0 ?asnssass om?s WA as; asnsvaw TIIM sNINan ass SWA I-Ims 'svs 3m. 01 as Tum am 13W 11an am. HUM sasmosd as soswas 3H1 'WnNE'ld WA NI asnssasd sums 3HJ. asuas WA as; NI sawsm aosmas asnssass sums summon sadwva l?l'lN3'ld UW asnssaud suns - as. rags II at ALan NW 3H1. HLIM Hammad as sW saawvu 3H1. ?xos sw NO ass ssaswsa NOWWOO uaaWwwoo as 11ws?saAIWs H3CW3H N1 SI so Isms 0; 031m SVH SWA ianHxa HJADEI so 3N0 AI Er:me A0 AsosA 1v asnssasd mass 930m wosA EJWHUOIN OJ. as sadwvs sw acnsmo sW .sts 01. saGWwwoo as ?Elm-Is WA .LBFIVHX3 swooas 3HJ. ?animus I: A0 NOdn masan VIA sums Isnsta mu A0 arm is NEHM Oi as Nada seam CLL as ssvaas slug-ammo sW HEIGVEH 0 us 11mg 'Anossm 33M3LNIW 111M 3HJ. 0W An-Asws WEILSAS NO 'ssaswvs sstAs mo sW sas?AaH Home. . I. . NOWWDD HWHS SWA 3HJ. wars ssnoI-I Irz msnonmmos awsado SWA as; saxasNI asno Isms-1mm snnaWH Hl?p' HilM asIIr ianHxa ?439393 . .- ILI'Iszsz as servants 05' II at! {sits} LLIIBZQZ ?.Ls?sn {mass Imam Hons-laden: aauanbas aIv-lis?iq? furl-?393 . - - :3 swans: IILIJEEQE -: - - I g. Z?mliqy 0 lat-{3H1} mama C. 2525mm (5)9142 ASSN-E 03? 2625ch Seg uence of Ogeration STARTISTOP - . ES THE VIVARIUM. BEFORE THE AIR HANDLER STARTS, ONE OF ASSOCIATED ENHA-UST FANS: WILL START. ONCE AT LEAST ONE OF THE EXHAUST FANS IS VERIFIED BY CURRENT SENSOR SWITCHES. THE AIR HANDLING UNIT WILL BE INDEXED ON. UPON A START COMMAND. THE OUTSIDE AIR DAMPER WILL OPEN. ONCE THE DAMPER IS OPEN. AS PROVEN BYA DAMPER END SWITCH, BOTH SUPPLY FANS WILL START. ONCE UNIT IS ON. THE UNIT WILL RUN CONTINUOUSLY. UPON AIR FLOW VERIFICATION VIA THE SUPPLY FAN VFD. ALL CONTROL LOOPS WILL BE ENABLED AND ALL TERMINAL UNITS SERVED BY THIS UNIT WILL BE INDEXED TO THE OCCUPIED MODE. WHEN THE AIR HANDLING UNIT IS SHUTDOWN ALL CONTROL LOOPS WILL BE DISABLED, AND THE OUTSIDE AIR DAMPER WILL SLOWLY CLOSE TO PREVENT HIGHILOW STATIC PRESSURE CONDITIONS. SUPPLY FAN VFD CONTROL: THE SUPPLY FAN WILL MODULATE VIA THE SAME CONTROL SIGNAL AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN THE SUPPLY AIR STATIC PRESSURE SETPOINT OF SUPPLY FAN VFD SOEI START CONTROL: BOTH SUPPLY FANS HAVE AN UNLOADED FAN START SEQUENCE (SOFT START) TO ENSURE THAT THE FANS START AT MINIMUM POSITION AND ARE SLOWLY RAMPED TO CONTROL SETPOINT. DISCHARGE TEMPERATURE CONTROL: THE HOT WATER VALVES AND CHILLED WATER VALVES WILL MODULATE IN SEQUENCE AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN DISCHARGE AIR TEMPERATURE SETPOINT. HEATING PUMP CONTROL: WHEN THE OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURE IS BELOW 40F (ADJJ AND THE UNIT IS OFF. THE HEATING COIL FREEZE PROTECTION PUMPS WILL START. THE PUMPS WILL BE OFF AT ALL OTHER TIMES. FILTER MONITORING: AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE OWS WHEN THE FILTER DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE EXCEEDS SETPOINT. SAFETIES AND ALARMS: UPON A DROP IN TEMPERATURE BELOW SETPOINT. AS SENSED BY THE TEMPERATURE LOW LIMIT, THE AIR HANDLING UNIT WILL SHUTDOWN AND AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE OWS. UPON A SIGNAL FROM THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. AS SENSED BYA SMOKE DETECTOR IN THE SUPPLY AIR DUCT OR THE ASSOCIATED EXHAUST AIR DUCT AND SENT TO THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEMI THE AIR HANDLING UNIT WILL SHUTDOWN AND AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE OWS. IF THE SUPPLY FAN VFD H-O-A SWITCH IS OUT OF THE AUTO POSITION FOR MORE THAN 10 MINUTES AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE OWS. FAN SHUTDOWN: THE STATUS OF THE SUPPLY FANS WILL BE MONITORED VIA THE VFDS. UPON SENSING THAT BOTH SUPPLY FAN ARE OFF1 THE DDC CONTROLLER WILL CLOSE THE OUTSIDE AIR DAMPERI CLOSE THE CHILLED WATER VALVES. AND OPEN THE HEATING VALVES TO MAINTAIN A HEATING DISCHARGE TEMPERATURE OF TIFF OVERRIDE PANEL CONTROL: THE OVERRIDE PANELWILL HAVE AN H-O-A SWITCH FOR THE AIR HANDLING UNIT TO BE OVERRIDEN ON OR OFF. IF THE SWITCH IS PLACED IN ALL SAFETIES WILL BE OVERRIDEN. POWER FAILURE AND RESTART: UPON A UTILITY POWER FAILURE. ALL SYSTEMS WILL SHUTDOWN. WHEN THE POWER IS RESTORED THE SYSTEM WILL RESTART BASED ON A PRIORITY RESTART SCHEDULE AND OPERATE UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS. SAFETY: DEVICES WILL BE PROVEN IN MANUAL AND AUTOMATIC OPERATION BEFORE THE UNIT WILL START. ALL OF THE SAFETY DEVICES ARE MANUAL THE DEVICE THAT HAS TRIPPED MUST BE MANUALLY RESET BEFORE RESTARTING THE AIR HANDLING UNIT. IF A TEMPERATURE LOW LIMIT SWITCH SENSES A TEMPERATURE BELOW SETPOINT THE SUPPLY FAN WILL BE SHUTDOWN AND AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE BAS. UPON A SIGNAL FROM THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. AS SENSED BY A SMOKE DETECTOR IN THE SUPPLY AIR DUCT OR THE ASSOCIATED EXHAUST AIR DUCT AND SENT TO THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM, THE AIR HANDLING UNITWILL SHUTDOWN AND AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE BAS. IF A HIGH STATIC PRESSURE SWITCH THE SUPPLY FAN SENSES A DISCHARGE PRESSURE THAT IS GREATER THAN SETPOINT1 SUPPLY FAN WILL BE SHUTDOWN AND AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE BAS. IF A LOW STATIC PRESSURE SWITCH LOCATED BEFORE THE EXHAUST FAN SENSES A DISCHARGE PRESSURE THAT IS BELOW SETPOINT, THE EXHAUST FAN WILL BE SHUTDOWN AND AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE BAS. IF THE SUPPLY FAN VFD H-O-A SWITCH IS OUT OF THE AUTO POSITION FOR MORE THAN 10 MINUTES (ADJJ. AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE OWS. SHUTDOWN: WHEN THE UNIT IS SHUTDOWN EITHER BYA FAILURE OF SUPPLY FANSI STOP COMMAND OR SYSTEM SAFETY THE UNIT WILL BE SET AS FOLLOWS: BOTH SUPPLY FANS WILL BE OFF OUTSIDE AIR ISOLATION DAMPER WILL CLOSE COOLING VALVE AND PREHEAT COIL WILL REMAIN IN CONTROL EXHAUST FAN WILL CONTINUE TO RUN TERMINAL UNITS WILL BE INDEXED TO UNOCCUPIED WISE UPON A SINGLE SUPPLY FAN FAILURE AN ALARM WILL BE GENERATED AT THE BAS AND THE UNIT WILL CONTINUE TO RUN. Methe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bel?ower. Craig (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Monday. November 22, 2010 2:39 PM To; Moss. Karen (CDCICCOOIBFO) Go: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Walpole. Kenneth K. Subject: RE: Control Resubmittal Karen, The correct information has been submitted on the zone sensor for the submittal dated 11l15l10. There are some issues with the drawings that don't match the latest as~built drawings that we haveon ?le. The contactor needs to come by and review the information that we have on file. Craig Belflower From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 10:50 AM To: Belflower, Craig Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Control Resubmittal Craig, Have you reviewed the control submittal? We meet with the contractors today and I need to? let them know yes or no on the Thanks Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-463-8307 Cell: 404-325-1332? Fax: rro-4ss-eoor email: KMossl @odogov Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Elelflower. Craig (CDCIOGOOIBFOJ Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 1:48 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Raymond. George Walpole, Kenneth K. - - Sequence Review.? .. Submittal Responsepdf at . .. -- Karen, Sequence of Operation - - attached ?le for the mark up to the control drawings regarding the sequence of operation for - 3 - - The sequence of operation for the control drawings should be updated to re?ect the current operatic al state of the system with no changes. Flow Measuring Stations I did not see any information on ?ow sensor sizing for expected flow range or length of probe. Has the duct sizing and flow rates for each drop been transmitted to The proper number and location of flow stations in the duct work could not be determined without mechanical duct work drawings. At this point. I am assuming that this will be ?eld coordinated. Zone Temperature Sensor The submittal shows a 1Kohm nickel-iron sensor. Please provide a 1Kohm platinum sensor. Craig Belflower From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 10:05 AM To: Bel?ower, Craig (CDCIOCOOIBFO) gag-$2 ISequence From: Moss, Karen (CDCXUCOOXBFO) Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 3:11 PM To: Raymond, George Probst.r Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: llii'alpolel Kenneth K. (CDCKOCOOIBFD) .EWSI ., -- -- ISequence Please review the controls submittal and send me your comments the sequence will be modified but we need to get the AFMS and the control valves ordered So please make this a priority to review. Thanks, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: newscasts Cell: 404-325-502? Fax: email: From: Avert! Wood Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 3:02 PM To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Ce: Mickie, Lenore Grant Willis Subject: RE: Ilbll3ii42 U-S-C- $5230?) ISequence Art. Karen, See attached submittal for JCl?s control part of the contract. This was submitted to me before you sent out the sequence and does not re?ect the sequence that was sent out todaycurrently working to revise their submittal for the new sequence. Thanks. Avery W. Wood Willis Mechanlcal Incorporated 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross. GA 30092 678 966 0094 Work 678 966 9420 For we on From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 2:12 PM To: Avery Wood; Grant Willis Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Mickie, Lenare .. Sequence Grant and Avery, See below. Regards, Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Dealgn Engineering Management Office 'l600 Clifton Road NE MS W97 Atlanta. Georgia 30333 7 1-11-1550? r= l' Ell-c 7.70 ?lb fi'i?? Efl?lall 5131952: I Iii'gdl: gov From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 2:10 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Raymond, George CDC OCOO BFO Bowen Ken L. Subject: FW: Building- {bli3-1342U-5-C- 32523?? Sequence Karen: Forwarding this in George?s absence today. Again, allow me to reiterate on behalf of BFO that the current operating Scenario is desired. and no modi?cations are recommended. Thanks, Paul 404-6 3941505 From: Bel?ower, Craig (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 1:45 PM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Subject: BuiIding Sequence USC. 2523I'h; Please see the attached sequences for and and have reviewed the programming for both systems and made changes to sequences to re?ect the current state of the controls. A?er reviewing of the current programming of theltwsizous. land wasteland [El FMEO recommends that the current sequence of operation in place should not be modi?ed. Craig Belflower LIE-3C: 2523 m; Sequencedocx? r'b'lt Mattie, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Walpole. Kenneth K. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 3:31 PM To: Moss, Karen Probst Paul E. Howard. William (Bill) Cc: Belflower. Craig (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Commissioning Pro-Test All. The Pre-Test was conducted successfully this morning and we veri?ed the control system functioned properly under various equipment failure scenarios. The ?xed position override {12-15%} of the two position damper that was discussed at lastweek's meeting was removed by prior to the testing so the two position damper functioned as originally programmed. The good news is that after the project team re-balanced the distribution system and replaced defective exhaust fan dampers, the controls will now maintain static pressure setpoint of (-3.25inwc) with only one exhaust fan in operalion so the fan capacity issue is closed. During the testing we identified the following minor discrepancies with the calibration and tuning of the modulating damper. 1. There appears to be a significant disparity between damper command and actual damper position for the modulating exhaust damper. We observed that in normal operation with both exhaust fans operating the modulating damper command was 70% and the actual damper position appeared to be less than 30% open. Calibration of the output transducer is required. 2. The response of the PID loop appears to be very slow. In some instances it took 3-5 minutes to return to setpoint after a failure. I believe this performance can be improved by re-tuning the loop. Once JCI addresses these issues. the only outstanding control system scope items FMEO still needs to verify is the operation of the new reheat coils, updating of the system graphicsldatabase to reflect new T843 flow settings, and updating of the existing BAS system documentation a software to re?ect changes made to suite 910. Thanks, Kenneth Walpole, PE, LEED-AP Mechanical Controls Engineer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-539-3020 (Office) 404-309-1st (Cell) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 10:35 AM To: - l: Walpole, Kenneth x. (cocrocoolsFO); Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIDCUUKOSHE) Cc: Moss, Karen (sociocoorBFO) Subject: Meeting Minutes All, Attached are the minutes from this morning?s meeting. Let me know if you have any additions or revisions to make. Thank you, File: P2009454 ICommission Meeting Minutes Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Unlea- diff. r3? email riff-cg: gm? Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEPI From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: .Frida Janus 28, 2011 4:21 PM To: I a. (cocrocooroseei Gc: Bowen, Ken L. (choiococveF - Howard William (Bill)- Zambuto, Laura R. cociommcezm); Chandler, George Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium Fir. will be ready to be re-occupied by the program on Monday morning, 1131(2011. The space is essentially ready now with one minor activity to be performed this weekend in the interstitial. Every attempt has been made to ensure that delays are kept to a minimum. The project team has compressed schedule activities, extended Working hours, fabrication schedules, etc., over the last several months in order to deliver this space as promised. We are always diligent in ensuring that quality controliassurance is performed thoroughly in all phases of execution and this sometimes presents us with tough circumstances and decisions. We do understand and appreciate the importance of your mission and apologize for any inconveniences this may have caused the program. Thanks again for your patience. J- Je?? Wf?rams Deputy Director comma/em 170.4 83.80 39 i [3.2169 I From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 2011 10:54 AM i To: Williams, Jeffery I Cc: Bowen, Ken L. i Subject: FW: Vivarium From: 33% I ?Sal (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:2? AM i To: Probst, Paul E. I Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Zambuto, Laura R. Subject: Vivarium It has co . to attention that Karen Moss is requesting more delays for the programs regarding the operations of the Apparently there are some ?re damper issues that will require entry into vivarium animal space. My question is why is this being brought up know and again delaying the programs. Apparently it was known earlier and an attempt was made to get the contractor in to make lh pairs before they went hot. It looks like they are now trying to get back in again tomorrow to complete or ?nish the fix. has been planning all week to go hot tomorrow (23JAN2011) with appropriate notices sent out. I would like to ?nd out if all attempts have been made to have this work done today or after hours tonight so as to not delay the programs. We had delays last week and down time all of this week to make repairs. Thanks Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 5:44 PM To: Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice 0. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George Subject: Re: Vivarium Work is complete. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device From: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCDDIBFD) To: Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Fri Jan 28 16:32:56 2011 Subject: Re: Vivarium i am arranging with to complete remediation before Monday. Art Lingler Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device From: Williams, Jefferyr (CDCIDCDDIBFO) To: Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George Sent: Fri Jan 28 16:02:24 2011 Subject: RE: Vivarium Team, I have discussed this issue with the team, and we have determined that it would be prudent and most practical to mitigate this issue as much as possible without signi?cantly delaying the program any further. Upon reviewing the design, speci?cations, cut-sheets, and actual installation, I would contend that the installation of the three assembiies (including mitigation listed below) essentially meets the intent of the applicable ?re safety codes. I would also contend (barring any additional items} that facilities turnover to operationsiprogram can be achieved NLT Monday, January 31, 2011. This determination does not offer an interpretation on the compiiancy of said instaiiation to the letter of appiicabie codes and standards based on otti'ciai contract documents. Mitigation: Since the issue is with the ?re rating (UL Fire Rated Assembiies) of the complete assembly and the ability to serve as a barrier against smokei?re propagation throughout the space, as the AHJ I feel it would be prudent to provide a layer of intumescent fire caulking (equivalent the rating of the assembly) between the damper sleeve, diffuser sleeve, and the 1 ?hacking? sleeve that was ?eld-installed against the coredlgrouted slab. The following is a list of other actions required to settle this issue from a code compliancy and contract adherence viewpoint. . Identify and document any possible non-conformances in detail and provide to P60 for disposition We should itemize each issue and speci?c location of possible non-conformances or deficiencies. and prepare draft scope and IGE required to remediate. It will be up to PGO to enforce such de?ciencies by withholding payment. extending contract period. etc, as long as we clearly identify the technical details and specific areas of non-conformance or non-compliance. - As AHJ, I have determined that this particular de?ciency does not rise to the level of placing personnel or property at risk {given the location of the installations, mitigating factors. etc}, and will write an of?cial temporary waiver with mandatory mitigations included. The mitigations will include returning to the installation in 12 months {or whenever an outage is offered) and performing correctionslremediation. etc. to meet the full intent and requirements of the design and all applicable codes and standards. I would like the project technical team and all necessary stakeholders to meet within the next 3 weeks to determine the extent to which a full remediation is required in 12 months. Things to consider: is there value-added in remediating the existing installation to the ?as-designed" con?rguration? Does the UL listing or UL rating of this installationiapplication bring additional value to the ?re-(life safety intent? Does the existing installation (along with any mitigating actions} bring this installation to a "code~equivalent" condition of performance? Please let me know if you have any additional comments or questions vtr, Jeff Williams Deputy Director Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) Buildings 8: Facilities Of?ce 770.488.8089 From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:54 AM To: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Fw: Vivarium FYI E) Sent: ThUrsday, January 27, 2011 10:27 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOJOSHE), Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDINCIRD) Subject: Vivarium It ha comy attention that Karen Moss is requesting more delays for the programs regarding the operations of the 5 $6352?? Apparently there are some ?re damper issues that will require entry into vivarium animal space. My question is why is this being brought up know and again delaying the programs. Apparently it was known earlier and an attempt was made to get the contractor in to make the repairs before they went hot. It looks like they are now trying to get back in again tomorrow to complete or ?nish the has been planning all week to go hot tomorrow (28JAN201 1} 2 with appropriate notices sent out. I would like to ?nd out if all attempts have been made to have this work done today or after hours tonight so as to not delay the programs. We had delays last week and downtime all of this week to make repairs. Mathe, Chester From: Bel?ower. Craig (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:31 AM To: Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Kenneth K. we PaulI . . . . El . . . . ibii3 '42 SC. I was on the area yesterday reviewmg to make asbullts for the animal spite. 'l-no-tloed Modem-Legach I Ii. dance? 7 F. Ended? supply air valve that feeds air into the 5' locked down for constant volume by The modulating control setpoint is based on the position indication ot the wall switrilis for lie cubicle rooms. This programming needs to decommissioned. However. the position of supply. valve needs to be locked down ?rst. 2. The positivelnegative command switches for the cubicles are still mounted on the wall down in the space. These switches need to be physically removed for proper decommissioning of the controls for the cubicles. These are some items that i noticed by observation. Let me know, if you need any assistance with these issues. Thanks. 42 252mb. Craig Belfiower Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Subject: Canceled: P2009453 Cat and Means of Egress Location: Williams Building Room 2603 Start: Thu 1f6l'20?l1 11:00 AM End: Thu 1162011 12:30 PM Show Time As: Free Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Not yet responded Organizer: Moss, Karen Required Attendees: Probst. Paul E. Walpole. Kenneth K. Blanchard. Thomas M. Tyler, John Lingler. Arthur R. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Importance: High When: Thursday, January 06, 2011 11:00 PM Eastern Time 8; Canada}. Where: Williams Building Room 2603 Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments. Should both supply fans shut down either due to failure or firefsmoke condition the pressures conditions encountered during recent commissioning does not meet the requirements of NFPA 101. Jeff Williams has requested the core team meet to discuss. Maths, Chester From: Probst, Paul E. (cocrocooreso) Thursday. January as, 2011 10:14 AM ,3 3 4T0: Wal Kenneth K. (cocrocoorBFm .. .FWZ. ivarium Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 3:59 PM {1:11:31 ?oaRrobst, . ?35239hbjecla RE Vivarium i can assist in assembling the information if you like. It could go out as a single document if everyone is in agreement. From: Probst, Paul E. ember 29, 2010 2:28 PM To: Cc: Howard, 'am (Bill) 11 i Lbj'l33142 US I3 ?2623Lhi 'n (CDCKOCOOJOSHE) Ol-t, we?ll see what we can do. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Ihinaiztz 1.13 2523.?: Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:26 PM To: Probst, Paul E. E: lioward, mam (cocrocooxosna; (cocrocoorosns) I . . 4 @525, ject: RE: ivarium Paul, I think there needs to be 1) a simple statement/memo from OSHE to the programs on their take {Pat may have a checklist from the final walk through], 2) a BFO document simply,?r outlining the testing performed [Dec 28] and results [is the contractor providing something?), and 3} there needs to be some documentation of the "new" air flow in the area that can be presented to DSAT (Roman can provide a snapshot of numbers right before it is ready to be occopied). If Joanne Jones is involved, there might something else that the R0 would want. Need to discuss this, but i think these don?t need to be more than 1 page each. Keep it simpie. 1 REE From: Probst, Paul E. Sen cember 29, 2010 1:39 PM To:. WW ?5-0 5 252m Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (CDC/ocoolosnls) (bll3li4 I 2628 lvarlum What kind of "report and associated documents" are we talking about?? Thanks Paul 404-639-0505 262301} - (brew was. 252m WW U-S-C- (coclom/NCEZID); From: ibii3li42 HCDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent! nes ay, December 29, 2010 8:4 (emanate :coclom/NCIRD); Williams, Allison CC: . . I Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. 3 :4 - - diva rium appears to have gone very well [Dec 28), and i believe programs should expect a report and assodated documents indicating this sometime in January. The return to service date ofJan 10 is still in effect, as there are a few things that need to be fixed and installed, followed by a final clean up by Goodwill. There is novllr a need for program operation protocols to be modified to reflect changes in entering, reentering, exiting, etc. This will be a major agenda item for the Jan 13 HOG meeting. When ready, please send the files to OSHE and I for review. Many thanks to all those who contributed to the looks very good and is a major improvement to the 'Fnrilif (b}[3}242 USC. 262aih} fbit?i i'bit?l Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Walpole, Kenneth K. Sent: Tuesday, December 21. 2010 3:31 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Probst, Paul E. - WW II mite Harvard. William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Belflower, Craig (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Commissioning Pre-Test All. The Pro-Test was conducted successfully this morning and we veri?ed the control system functioned properly under various equipment failure scenarios. The ?xed position override (12?15%) of the two position damper that was discussed at last week?s meeting was removed by prior to the testing so the two position damper functioned as originally programmed. The good news is that after the project team re-balanced the distribution system and replaced defective exhaust fan dampers. the controls will now maintain static pressure setpoint of (-3.25inwc) with only one exhaust fan in operation so the fan capacity issue is closed. During the testing we identified the following minor discrepancies with the calibration and tuning of the modulating damper. 1. There appears to be a significant disparity between damper command and actual damper position for the modulating exhaust damper. We observed that in normal operation with both exhaust fans operating the modulating damper command was and the actual damper position appeared to be less than 30% open. Calibration of the output transducer is required. 2. The response of the PID loop appears to be very slow. in some instances it took 3-5 minutes to return to setpoint after a failure. I believe this performance can be improved by re-tuning the loop. Once .10] addresses these issues, the only outstanding centrol system scope items FMEO still needs to verify is the operation of the new reheat coils, Updating of the system graphicsl'database to re?ect new TaEl ?ow settings, and updating of the existing BAS system documentation 8. software to re?ect changes made to suite 910. Thanks, Kenneth Walpole, PE, LEED-AP Mechanical! Controls Engineer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-3020 {Office} 404-309-1505 (Cell) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 10:35 AM To: - - - Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: Meeting Minutes All, Attached are the minutes from this morning's meeting. Let me know if you have any additions or revisions to make. Thank you, re: File: P2009453 Commission Meeting Minutes 12353010.pdf J2 U5 52523il13 Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atianla. Georgia 30333 or?ce; wows-830? Ceil 404-325-332? Fax I'm-488266? man-W Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: - Monday, December 20, 2010 12:37 PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Bel?ower-, Craig (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Suite pressures in full AHU failure mode. Attachments: ASHRAE 5. ADA Code - Door Opening Forcespdf Ken and Craig, I meant to copy you on this as well. Regards, Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce i600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: noses-sac? Cell: masses-32? Fax; email: 104955 I @cdc,ggv From: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCDDIBFO) Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 12:36 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCCOIOSHE) Cc: Daniels, Charles E. Tyler, John Lingler, Arthur R. Moss, Karen Subject: FW: Suite pressures in full AHU failure mode. Gentlemen, Refer to the email below from Test and Balance. See attached chart from ASHRAE and note that for a 40" wide door the amount of force required to open the door at 0.5 to 0.56 is off the chart. 1 calculated approximately 40 lb of force to open the door under the severe negative pressures noted by Test and Balance. Refer to ADA (14.13.11) requirement of maximum force of5 lbs. We have a egress issue and code violation issue here. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: muses-sac? Cell: 404-825-532? Fax: email: KMoss] From: (We Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 3:18 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Suite in full AHU failure mode. Karen, . . Per your request the results of the surte pressures In a use full failure mode are noted below. We have tested the suite in full AHU failure and the EFs dropped to one fan and the bypass and header dampers both opened fully in this failure mode we tested -0.50"w.c. to -0.58"w.c in the lab at the two main exit doors. The incinerator room was creating air whistling noise at the door and the outside air intake dampers. Respectfully. gm L. Wm Air Analysis of Atlanta. inc WEI-9293 65 Of?ce Mobile From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 10:35 AM -- I: Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: Meeting Minutes All, Attached are the minutes from this morning?s meeting. Let me know if you have any additions or revisions to make. Thank you, lCommission Meeting Minutes Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce; Call: 404-825-682? Fax: email: KMoss {agcdugug unu- 52.6 Examples 2 and 3 demonstrate that the air needed to prevent smoke back?ow can support an extremely large lire. Most com- mercial and residential buildings contain enough fuel [paper, card- board, furniture, etc.) to support very large ?res. Even when the amount of fuel is normally very small, short-tenn fuel loads (dur- ing building renovation, material delivery, etc.) can be signi?cant. Therefore, using air?ow for smoke control is not recommended, except when the ?re is suppressed or in the rare cases when ?re] can be restricted with con?dence. Example What airflow at a doorway is needed to stop smoke baek?ow from a room fully involved-in fire, and how large a ?re can this air?ow support? A roomful] involved in ?re can have an energy release rate on the order ofd 10? Assume the door is 3 ftwidc and it high. From Equation (ill), a, stars toirsj'ii 'tht arm. a flow through the doonvoy of 790 3 16,600 c?n is needed to prevent smoke from buck?owing into the area. if all the oxygen in this air?ow is consumed in?tlte ?re, the heat lib- erated is 16,600 c?n 5350 - tilif Ettu?h. This is over It] times more than the heat generated by the fully involved room ?re and indicates wiry air?ow is generally not recommended for smoke control in buildings. Example 3. .lr'hat airflow is needed to stop smol-te backtlow from a waste basket tire, and how large a ?re can this airflow support? A tvastebaslret fire can have an energy release rate on the order of a to5 auto. As in Example 2. I, seats a 10513)? are ?rm. a flow through the doorway ol'31tl 3 'i 6500 c?n is needed to prevent smoke backilow. lfall the oxygen in this airfl ow is consumed in the ?re, the heat lib- erated is 6500 efm I 5850 Btm?h-cfm 3.8 a lit? Btut'h. This is still many times greater than the fully involved room ?re and further indi- cates why air?ow is generally not recommend ed for smoke control in buildings. Buoyancy The buoyancy of hot combustion gases is used in both fart- powered artd non-fan?powered venting systems. Farr-powered venting for large spaces is commonly used for atriums and cov- ered shopping malls, and non-fan-powered venting is commonly used for large industrial and storage buildings. There is a concern that sprinkler ?ow will cool the smoke, reducing buoyancy and thus the system effectiveness. Research is needed in this area. Refer to Klote and l?vlilke (20132) and NEPA Standards 923 and 204 for detailed design information about these systems. SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN Door-Opening Forces The door-opening Forces resulting from the pressure differences produced by a smoke control system must-be considered. Unreason- ably high door-openin forces can make it difficult or imp ossible for occupants to open doors to refuge areas or escape routes. The force required to open a door is the sum of the forces to over- come the pressure difference across the door and to overcome the door closer. This can be expressed as 5.2mm op aur? a) (1 I) the irritate total door-opening force, lb,- force to overcome door closer, lb; ii? door width, It A door area. it! up pressure difference across door, in. of water it is distance from doorknob to edge of knob side of door. it This relation assumes that the door-opening Force is applied at the knob. Door-opening force FF caused by pressure difference can 2007 ASHRAE Haudhoolt?HVAC Applications mil0.1 0.2 [Lil . 5 PRESSUR In. of water Fig. Door-Opening Force Caused by Pressure Difference be determined from Figure for a value of 3 in. The force to overcome the door closet is usually greater than 3 thread, in some cases, catr he as great as 20 lbf. For a door that is it high and 3 ft wide and subject to a pressure difference of {1.30 in. of water, the total door-opening force is 30 Ihf, it' the force to overcome the door closer is 12 lbf. Flow Areas In designing smoke control systems, air?ow paths must be iden- ti?ed and evaluated. Some leakage paths are obvious, such as erac its around closed doors, open doors, elevator doors, windows, and air transfer grilles. Construction cracks in building walls are less obvi- ous, but they are equally important. The flow area ofmost large openings, such as open windows, can be calculated easily. However, ?ow areas of racks are me re dif?cult to evaluate. The area of these leakage paths depends on such features as vmrtunanehip, door and was therstrippi rig. A 3 by 'l it door with an average crack width of HS in. has a leakage area of t].2l it}. How- ever, if this door is installed with a Bid in. undercut, the leakage area is 0.36 t?t2, a significant di ?erence. The leakage area ofeleVator doors is in the range oft}.55 to 0.?0 ft1 per door. For open stairwell doorways, Cresei (WEB) found complex ?ow patients; the resulting flow through open doorways was considerably below that calculated-Ital the doonvay's geometric area as the ?ow area in Equation (3). Based on this rcscarch,.it is recommended that the design flow area of an open stairwell doonvay behalf the geomet- ric area (door height 3-: width) of the doc nvey. An alternative for open stairwell doorways is to use the geometric area as the flow area and use a reduced flow co ef?cient. Because it does not allow the direct use of Equation (3), this approach is not used here. Typical leakage areas for walls and ?oors of commercial build- ings are tabulated as area ratios in Table 1. These data are based on a relatively small number of tests performed by the National Research Council of Canada (Shaw et al. [993: Tarnura and Shaw lQTtia, 1976b, l9?8; Tamara and Wilson 1966}. Actual leakage areas depend primarily on u'orionanship rather than on construction mate- rials, and in some cases, the flow areas in particular buildings may vary from the values listed. Data concerning air leakage through building components are also provided in Chapter of the?2005 ASHRAEHm:rihooir??mdomeurols. Because a vent surface is usually covered by a louver and screen. 3 vent's ?ow area is less than its area [vent height is width]. Calculation - 4.13.6 Maneuvering Clearances at Doors. Minimum maneuvering clearances at doors that are not automatic or powerassisted shall be as shown in Fig. 25. The ?oor or ground area within the required clearances shall be level and clear. Entry doors to acute care hospital bedrooms for inpatients shall be exempted from the requirement for space at the latch side at the door {see dimension "it" in Fig. 1'5) if the doorisatieastMinilliilJ mm) wide. 4.13.? Two Doors In Series. The minimum space between hinged or pivoted doors in series shall be 48 in {1220 mm) plus the width of any door swinging into the space Doors in series shall swing eldter in the same direction or away from the space between the doors {see Fig. 26). 4.13.8' Thresholds at Doorways. Thresholds at doorways shall not exceed in (19 mm) in height for exterior sliding doors or U2 in {13 mm} for other types of doors Raised thresholds and ?oor level changes at accessible doorways shall be beveled with a slope no greater than 1:2 (see 4.52). 4.13.9' Door Hardware. Handles. pulls. latches. locks. and other operating devices on accessible doors shall have a shape that is easy to grasp with one hand and does not require tight grasping. tight pinching, or twisting of the wrist to Operate. Lever?operated mechanisms. push-type mechanisms. and U-shaped handles are acceptable designs. When sliding doors are fully open. operating hardware shall be exposed and usable from both sides in dwelling units. only doors at accessible entrances to the unit itself shall comply with the requirements of this paragraph Doors to hazardous areas shall have hardware complying with 4.29.3. Mount no hardware required {Or accessible doorpassage rugherthan?tain {12.20an above ?nished ?oor. 4.13.10. Door Closers. If a door has a closer. then the sweep period of the closer shall be adjusted so that from an open position of 70 degrees. the door will take at least 3 seconds to move to a point 3 in (75 mm) from the latch. measumd to the leading edge at the door. 4.13.11? Door Opening Force. The maidmum force for pushing or pulling open a door shall be as follows.- (1) Fire doors she? have the minimum opening force allowable by the appropriate administrative authority. (2) Other doors. exterior hinged doors- (Rescued). interior hinged doors: 5 Ibf {cl sliding or iolding doors 5 (222?) These force requinedto re tract latch bolts or disengage other devices that may hold the door in a closed position. 36 4.13 Doors 4.1.3.12" Automatic Doors and Power-Assisted Doors. if an automatic door is used. then it shall com- ply with American National Standard for Power- Operated Doors. ANSI Slowly opening. low-powered. automatic doors shall be considered a type of custom design installation as described in paragraph otAHSl Such doors shall not open to back check faster than 3 seconds and shall require no more than 15 ibf (66.6Hi to stop door movement if a power-assisted door is used. Its door-opening force shall comply with 4.13.11 and its closing shall conform to the requirements In section of 4.14 Entrances. 4.14.1 Minimum Number. Entrances required to be accessible by 4.l shall be part of an accessible route and shall comply with 4.3. Such entrances shall be connected by an accessible route to public transportation stops, to accessible parking and passenger loading zones. and to public streets or sidewalks if available (see 432(1)). They shall also be connected by an accessible route to all accessible spaces or elements within the building or facility. 4.14.2 Service Entrances. A service entrance shall not be the sole accessible entrance unless it is the only entrance to a building or facility (for example. in a fac- tory or garage}. 4.15 Drinking Fountains and Water Coolers. 4.15.1 Minimum Number. Drinking fountains or water coolers required to be accessible by4.l shall cmiplg with 4.15. 4.15.2' Spout Height. Spouts shall be no higher than 36 in (915 mm). measured from the ?oor or ground surfaces to the spout outlet (see Fig. 27M). 4.15.3 Spout Location. The spouts of drinking fountains and water coolers shall be at the front of the unit and shall direct the water flow in a trajectory that in (100 mm] high so as to allow the insertion of a cup or glass uncles the ?oor of water. 4.15.4 Controls. Controls shall comply with 4.27.4. near the iron: ems. 4.15.5 Cleaners. Wall and postmounted cantilevered units shall haveaclearlmee spacebetweenthe bottom ofthe apron and the ?oor or ground at least 2? in [685 mm) high. 30 mm) wide. and 17 into 19 in (430 mm to 485 mm] deep (see Fig. 274a} and (tin. Such units shall also have a minimum clear floor space 30 i1 by48 in {760 mm by 1220 mm) to allow a perSOn in a wheelchair to approach the unit facing fonrvaid ADA Handbook Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday. December 15, 2010 1' To: Probst. Paul E. - we award, William (Bill) I Go: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDDIBFO) Subject: Meeting Minutes All, Attached are the minutes from this morning?s meeting. Let me know if you have any additions or revisions to make. Thank you, ?i at?. ?were messes I 2525th ngIC [v1.31 Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road M5 M8 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: noses-33m Cell; 404-525-6321? Fax: 770-433-2557 emall: WEIR MEETING Center for Disease Control and Prevention Date: December 15, 2010 Ib'il'Bi'sl?E to Subject: P2009453 - Building HVAC Modi?catiori Location: Conference Call Attendees: Karen Moss DEMOIBFO Gordon Verwers - AAI Paul Probst FMEOIBFO Felix Graves - AAI Bill Howard case - cuss Ken Walpole FMEOIB F0 The purpose of this meeting was to discuss commissioning on the above referenced projecn Discussion: 1. Currently test and balance have the fixed 2 position damper is set to 124596 open. The damper stays in this position whether both fans are running. If one fan fails the damper remains in this ?xed 12-15% set point. The static damper adjusts and modulates to maintain static pressure set point. Exhaust static pressure set point is currently set at 3.25 in WC. Commissioning exhaust fan scenario: (1) Both fans running in parallel (2) Fail fan liblle'lf? @533?) (4) Fail both exhaust fans and verify supply fans shutdown. Restart of the system. AAI will test and verify existing sequence for egress mode due to liability issues. Ken Walpole checked the code and if both supply fans fail the following should happen: (1) is interlock with the supply fans. runs all the time. If both supply fans fail; fan 20 should fail and both the 2 position damper and the static damper should go to 100% open. Pre-test is set up for Tuesday, December 21st at 3:00 am. AAI to give Ken Walpole the static pressure set point values. AAI will test the response time of the control system to ensure the 2 position damper operation described in item #1 happens fast enough within the control loop. If response time is not fast enough AAI will test with 2 position damper 100% open position during normal operation and 100% cloSed position upon fan failure. sne- we 5'3? 90:4 "The" control panel is in the mechanical room under the penthouse. Four Seasons can direct AAI to the panel. 10. Darius with JCI has met with Craig Belflower regarding control as?asbuilts. l. OHSE has put up new tell-tales on the slots after screens went up. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: FridayI December 10, 2010 9:53 AM To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Belflower, Craig Phillips. Roman (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: Vivarium Area Controls KareniArt: Following up on our meeting from Wednesday, it my understanding that all physical ?eld work has been performed by JCI, and that they are lacking Graphics on the workstation as well as the submittals you are looking for. I assume the submiitals will become their as-builts. - iS-my Regarding the change to the positiveinegative isolation rooms -- balancing purposes that the related exhaust valves have been simply disconnected from pneumatics and set in a ?xed c?biiai spasm. The supply grilleuseijving the gylerallusgitel:ll functioned in three position mode depending on the above 252mm listed ithd?heede to be fixed position. For proper decommissioning, we need for JCI to make the necessary programming adjustments to the BAS re?ecting changes to the suite. re?ect the changes on as?buiit documentation, and make the physical field change of removing the key switches andior putting a stainless steel cover plate to ?t into the existing hole of the wall key control. Concerning our time constraints. only [he cover plate is necessary before re-occupancy. Please copy Craig and Ken on any correspondence related to this matter. And, in general, regarding frustration with JGI, just like any other sub, no payment will get their attention. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dir., Operations BFOiFacilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-235-2560 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: . Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:36 PM 3 Zambuto. Laura I I I I Ilmn?- I - (cesiOIerNe-Ezro); was. - -I as E. ibiEE} luvs,? $52.3? Howard, William (Elill) Williams. Allison Harris, Desiree Bird, Brian (cocrommcezm) Cc' Lingler, Arthur R. Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth ?262a 42 LJ.S.C ?262a {we wages (Cliit'leCCiOlt --Walk through "of ivarium All, a'follow Lipto the'B'ld' vivarium tour and meeting afterwards (Ito discuss changes to procedures}, I am providing a PDF attachment (as a reference for the major changes to the yivarium) and the following discussion points: C. 2623 Ihi 1 Construction to redirect airflow into the animal room (from what was once the will require changes to program operating procedures . 2 -When exiting animal room into the common anteroom, decontamination and disposal of PPE (Tyvek, outer foo covers, and outer gloves) will take place at the exit. 3 PAPR will also be sprayed down with decontamination solution prior to exiting. 4 PAPR can be removed once inside the common anteroom or at the entrance to the dressing rooms. 5? At the entrance to the dressing room, PAPR, inner gloves, and inn!er foot covers will be spray decontaminated and discarded in the trash bin prior to entering into the room leading to the area. There was discussion of re?entry into rooms and the following was to'uched on 1 Program will decide how re-entry takesplace 2 Re?entry into associated room {fro could take place by donning new Tyvek, gloves, and foot cover (without changing clothing; PPE could be stored in the common anterIooml 3 - If re-entry is to take place into an unassociated room, it requires a change of clothing 4 eThe idea that ARB staff could enter and exit the rooms exclusively'through the common anteroom was entertained 5 Alternatives to the current space usage model were discussed Construction appears to be progressing smootth and will begin soon. For those of you who attended the tour and meeting, please provide to the above points, as well as any comments you would like to make regarding the discussiolns. Ibh?. "Fill l3. to Ho "apart-.2 AirRedire. . . Page 2241 {mm-.42 use. 132525.431; Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 4:02 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George Subject: RE: Vivarium Team, I have discussed this issue with the team, and we have determined that it would be prudent and most practical to mitigate this issue as much as possible without significantly delaying the program any further. Upon reviewing the design, speci?cations. cut-sheets, and actual installation, I would contend that the installation of the three assemblies (including mitigation listed below) essentially meets the intent of the applicable ?re safety codes. i would also contend (barring any additional items) that facilities turnover to operationsiprogram can be achieved NLT Monday, January 31, 2011. This determination does not offer an interpretation on the compiiancy of said instaiiation to the fetter of applicabie codes and standards based on official contract documents. Mitigation: Since the issue is with the ?re rating (UL Fire Rated Assembiies) of the complete assemny and the ability to serve as a barrier against smokeifire propagation throughout the space, as the AHJ feel it would be prudent to provide a layer of intumescent ?re caulking (equivalent the rating of the assembly) between the damper sleeve, diffuser sleeve, and the "backing" sleeve that was ?eld-installed against the coredigrouted slab. The following is a list of other actions required to settle this issue from a code compliancy and contract adherence viewpoint. - identify and document any possible non-conformances in detail and provide to PGO for disposition. We should itemize each issue and specific location of possible non-conformances or deficiencies, and prepare draft scope and IGE required to remediate. It will be up to P60 to enforce such de?ciencies by withholding payment, extending contract period, as long as we clearly identify the technical details and speci?c areas of non- conformance or non-compliance. - As AHJ, have determined that this particular de?ciency does not rise to the level of placing personnel or property at risk (given the tocation of the installations, mitigating factors. etc), and will write an official temporary waiver with mandatory mitigations included. The mitigations will include returning to the installation in 12 months (or whenever an outage is offered) and performing correctionsiremediation, etc. to meet the full intent and requirements of the design and all applicable codes and standards. - i would like the project technical team and all necessary stakeholders to meet within the next 3 weeks to determine the extent to which a full remediation is required in 12 months. Things to consider: is there value- added in remediating the existing installation to the "as-designed" confirguration? Does the UL listing or UL rating of this installationiapplication bring additional value to the ?reilife safety intent? Does the existing installation (along with any mitigating actions) bring this installation to a ?code-equivalent" condition of performance? Please let me know if you have any additiOnal comments or questions. vir. Jeff Williams Deputy Director Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) Buildings Facilities Office ??0.488.8089 From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:54 AM To: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI From:[ E) Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:27 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (cociocooiOSHE); Zambuto, Laura R- Subject: Vivarium it has come to my attention that Karen Moss is requesting more delays for the programs regarding the operations of the there are some ?re damper issues that will require entry into yivarium animal space. My question is why is this being brought up know and again delaying the programs. Apparently it was known earlier and an attempt was made to get the contractor in to make to airs before they went hot. it looks like they are now trying to get back in again tomorrow to complete or ?nish the fix. has been planning all week to go hot tomorrow with appropriate notices sent out. would like to ?nd out if all attempts have been made to have this work done today or after hours tonight so as to not delay the programs. We had delays last week and down time all of this week to make repairs. Thanks IIEI Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Craig (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 6:29 PM To: Probst. Paul E. Subject: Re: JCI As Builts Paul I spoke with Darius about the as-builts. He indicated that there may be errors in the set. He is going email me some visio drawings to review and store on our shared drive. I plan to meet with Darius early next week to try and tie any loose ends. Craig From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Bel?ower, Craig Sent: Fri Jan 0? 18:23:52 2011 Subject: FW: JCI As Builts Craig: Do not want to be a bother to you. Please advise if you are not the person who should be reviewing these. I am assuming that your history with the project makes you a good candidate. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, January 2011 5:44 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: FW: JCI As Builts What is the status of FM EO's review of this? Thanks, From: Avery Wood Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 3:45 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDC/ocoostO); Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Nickle, Lenore (CDCIOCUOKPGO): Grant Willis Subject: JCI As Bullts Art, Karen, See attached are 0&M?s and As-Built documents from CI. I would like to have you take a look at these before I turn them in with our other close out documents. Thanks, Avery W. Wood IV Willis Mechanical - In corp ord- ted 3230 Peachtree Corners Circle Norcross, GA 30092 673 966 0094 Work 673 966 9420 Fox Cell From: Mom-Karen (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 2:32 PM To: Avery Wood Cc: Mickie, Lenore Lingler, Arthur R. Grant Willis Subject: FW: Commissioning Avery, Below is testing we expect to do on the Please send to Karen From: Gordon Verwers Sent: Thursday, December 23,r 2010 1:36 PM To: Moss, Karen Subject: RE: Commissioning Commissioning Tests: ib?ligm Fail by throwing disconnect on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position damper closes and 2:32am] .. -- 3 4 exhaust plenum static con?Tnl damper modulates to maintain static pressure set point w.c. for the exhaust 52mm; ?3 system . -- no: maintalns pre-fallure operating conditions yes no. All labs maintain required directional air?ow yes no. (him 42 .. Restore into operation and allow system to stabilize. _Fa.il.l:l by throwing disconnect on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position damper closes and exhaust plenum static control dam er modulates to maintain static pressure set point w.c. for the exhaust $53320? ties .. lmaintains pre?failure operating conditions _yes no. All labs maintain lb:l3>:42 use-Is.? required . . yes ?no' . . i . _2 252mm Expected results: The remaining . continuesto operate speeds up anew supply duct static pressure set point . . the supplyair system yes 252mm continue to operate normally yes no. All labs maintain reqmred directional air?ow yes no. Restore. peration and allow system to stabil? I ssh? ?Buff Exgected results: The remaining continue-etcoperateand speeds up and maintains supply duct static pressure set point w.c. or the supply air system yes $553.13.? n0.Both-- continue to operate normally yes no. All labs maintain required directional . airfl 5 no. instill? by throwing disconnect on roof. Expected results: Exum two position damper 30 a and exhaust plenum static control damper closes. no. shuts-down-both- supplyait 'i and related isolation dampers. _yes no. All labs required directional air?ow is not maintained yes no. ung. Restore Ial operation. mg; U535 5333i? xn'e'stsa"'results continues to operate a shuts-down: Both exhe-ustaten. .. plenum dampers open 100%. yes no . no. Labs suite maintains negative pressure to surrounding areas yes no. All lab directional air ?ow is not maintained _yes no. Required strength to open exit doors from the lab suite is acceptable to CDC for egress of occupants yes. no. 10. Kill power to all four fans simultaneously was suggested. Exgected results: Lab suite directional air?ow is not maintained yes no. Air flowr patterns in the suite are directional to the cage wash area yes no. i Respectfully. Gordon L. Veneers Air Analysis of Atlanta. inc 770-929-3 I 65 Of?ce . Mobile From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 3:51 AM To: gordonQIQD?ersmm Subject: Commissioning Gordon, 1 need scope for johnson controls. Do you have something I can send them? Karen Moss PE. Maths, Chester (cocrocoorosee) From: Dumas. Michael D. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) . Sent: Friday. January 2011 8:37 AM To: Ford, Maria Cristina (cocrommcezm); Yearoy, Marie (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Cc: Nogueira. William P. Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subiect: RE: Vivarium cleaning Thanks 9W3. It was our pleasure to serve yo . From: Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Frida Janua 07, 2011 ?:41 AM T0: were cease Dumas, Michael D. (CDCIOCUOIBFO) Yearbv, Morie (madcap/are) (CTR) Cc: Nogueira, William Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium cleaning Mr. Dumas, lbll'JiielE Please see email below from Thanks Goodwill for doing such an outstanding job Yesterday in USP-s 2B2a[h" I I - M. Cristina Ferd CDC Buildings and Facilities 0 iicelfBFOi Assistant Building Coordinator egg-$3? ?5'3 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333 404?639-1655 From: Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 5:16 PM To: Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Nogueira, William P. Subject: RE: Vivarium cleaning Cristina, Please convey my deepest hanks to all the Goodwill staff who performed a remarkablejob in preparing the Bid Vivarium for occupancy next week. They handled this monstrous job very quickly and professionally and I am extremely pleased with the results. Itwas a pleasure interacting with all those who contributed in this effort, you and Paul induded. isms-2 use. 2:32am; Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 37:41 AM To: (his; Dumas, Michael D. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Yearby, lv'orie (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Co: Nogueira, William P. Probsf, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium cleaning Mr. Dumas, Please see email below from ufsc: Thanks Goodwill for doing such an outstanding job yesterday in 1 . . Vavarium. M. Cristina Ford CDC Buildings and Facilities Of ice Assistant Building Coordinator {Eb?l??f 5 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333 404~639-1655 . -- Sent: Thursday, January,' 06, 2011 5:16 PM To: Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Nogueira, William P. Subject: RE: Vivarium cleaning Cristina, . Please come?; my deepest hanks to all the Goodwill staff who performed a remarkable job in preparing the Bid l?rivarium for next week. They handled this monstrous job very quickly and professionallv and I am extremer pleased with the results. It was a pleasure interacting with all those who contributed in this effort, you and Paul inrluried - 42 U5 '3 33262th Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Thursday. January DEE, 2011 2:34 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Tyler, John Moss, Karen Howard, William (Bill) (CDCJOCOOIOSHE) Subject: Vivarium Wall Walls look great. If the walls prior to rework were a 1.5 on a scale to 10, then these are a nine. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Dirt, Operations BFOIFaoilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce 404-639-0505 Cell: 404-285-2560 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 10:14 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: [EIVivarium Thanks, Paul 4 04-839-0505 From I Eng: ?5222 I I "?'d'z?izl NCEZID) Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 3:59 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium I can assist in assembling the information if you like. It could go out as a single document if everyone is in agreement. lbll?l From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesda December 29, 2010 2:23 PM To: Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Subject: RE: EEI Vivarium -- (Cociocooroms) 0k, we'll see what we can do. Thanks, Paul 404-539-0505 From: I. . Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:26 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Howard, William (Bill) ?Just-Ly. Subject: RE: EVivarium E) Paul, 1 think there needs to be 1) a simple statementfmemo from OSHE to the programs on their take (Pat may have a checklist from the ?nal walk through), 2) a BFO document simply outlining the testing performed (Dec 28) and results {is the contractor providing something?}, and 3} there needs to be some documentation ofthe ?new? air flow in the area that can be presented to DSAT {Roman can provide a snapshot of numbers right before it is ready to be occupied). If Joanne Jones is involved, there might something else that the RD would want. Need to discuss this, but I think these don?t need to be more than 1 page each. Keep it simple. 1 lbn3k42 262alh1 From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOIBFD) Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 1:39 PM . . ?Maggi _ward, (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Vivarium lb lbd3z42 252aur What kind of ?report and associated documents" are we talking about? Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: '3 Emmi Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 8: :u E??illizl?i?iainnutagg [as I malls. (coclom/NCEZID); lea. James E. luvs: we (coclommcezro); Inna: [coclommcezmx cocloro/Ncezm) 252a,. W3, 495: me (coclocooIOSHE); Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. (coclocoolsFO) ?2sza?ubjeii=wvarium lens} ?lly so s2623il?he com'mi'ss'io'ni?n?gft'es'ting of't'h'e B'l'ti ivarium appears to have gone very well (Dec 23), and I believe programs should expect a report and associated documents indicating this sometime in January. The return to service date ofJan 10 is still in effect, as there are a few things that need to be ?xed and installed, followed by a ?nal clean up by Goodwill. There is now a need for program operation protocols to be modi?ed to reflect changes in entering, reentering, exiting, etc. This will be a major agenda item for the Jan 13 HOG meeting. When ready, please send the ?les to OSHE and I for review. Many thanks to all those who contributed to the looks very good and is a major improvement to the facilitv. - USE. 2523 ih? Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, January 31. 2011 10:08 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Nogueira1 William P. Subject: FW: Door Sensor see below. The sensor should be provided by Willis Mechanical. Karen Moss E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce I 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS i Atlanta. Georgia 30333 . Of?ce: 770-400-330? Cell: 404-8 25-632? Fax: WEI-4804657 email: Mgg?i @cdcgov From: Tyler, John Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 12:23 PM To: Moss, Karen Subject: FW: Door Sensor Enclosed is the cut sheet for the door sensor. The remote is component 9. I have included the companfs ?user guide? for the remote as well. Our understanding is that the remote was to be supplied with the sensor; and as such, I consider it an architectural punch item. If Willis does nothave it, they can be purchased for around $40 from various retailers. If we need more info on where to buy this in the future let me know. I As far as the fireproo?ng ?Art tells me the GFR did use our speci?ed product for firestopping at conduits and such, but I Karen, i that McKennies actually did the ?restopping at the three penetrations in the corridor ceiling. He says he saw it installed, and they.' were able to effectively use grout. This is a change from the contract documents, so at this stage in the game I think an appropriate punch item would be to see a submittal on the grout used and the install method. If that information can be obtained and it is acceptable grout as a ?re stopping material I will have no doubts that the integrity of the ?re barrier has been maintained. I lfyou have any questions please let me know. Thanks, John was Vim BEA eagleR EMOT. . . From: Tyler, John Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 1:21 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Subject: FW: Door Sensor Karen. Enclosed below is the cut sheet from the door sensor. Note component 9. If you have any questions piease let me know. Thanks, - John From: Tyler, John Sent: Thursday, December 16?r 2010 ?:26 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Subject: RE: Door Sensor After closer inspection of these two products, I am recommending the BEA Eagle product. it can be gotten off the shelf, for about $250 with mounting bracket and weather protection hood, is small enough to mount on the face of the door closer cover and has the beam throw that we need for carts. John .4 hes-Ea gle_web . Page 2254 use. 252mm From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCJOCODIBFO) To: Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George Sent: Fri Jan 28 16:02:24 2011 Subject: RE: Vivarium Team, have discussed this issue with the team, and we have determined that it would be prudent and most practical to mitigate this issue as much as possible without signi?cantly delaying the program any further. Upon reviewing the design, speci?cations, cut-sheets. and actual installation, I would contend that the installation of the three assemblies (including mitigation listed below) essentially meets the intent of the applicable ?re safety codes. 1 would also contend (barring any additional items) that facilities turnover to can be achieved NLT Monday, January 31, 2011. This determination does not offer an interpretation on the compiiancy of said installation to the letter of applicable codes and standards based on official contract documents. Mitigation: Since the issue is with the fire rating (UL Fire Rated Assemblies) of the complete assembly and the ability to serve as a barrier against smoket?re propagation throughout the space, as the AHJ feel it would be prudent to provide a layer of intumescent fire caulking (equivalent the rating of the assembly) between the damper sleeve, diffuser sleeve, and the "backing" sleeve that was ?eld-installed against the coredigrouted slab. The following is a list of other actions required to settle this issue from a code compliancy and contract adherence viewpoint. - identify and document any possible non-contormances in detail and provide to PGO for disposition. We should itemize each issue and speci?c location of possible nonrconformances or de?ciencies, and prepare draft scope and required to remediate. it will be Up to P60 to enforce such de?ciencies by withholding payment, extending contract period. etc. as long as we clearly identify the technical details and speci?c areas of non-conformance or non-compliance. - As AHJ, have determined thatrthis particular de?ciency does not rise to the level of placing personnel or property at risk (given the location of the installations, mitigating factors, etc), and will write an of?cial temporary waiver with mandatory mitigations included. The mitigations will include returning to the installation in 12 months (or whenever an outage is offered) and perionning correctionsfremediation, etc. to meet the full intent and requirements of the design and all applicable codes and standards. - I would like the project technical team and all necessary stakeholders to meetwithin the next 3 weeks to determine the extent to which a full remediation is required in 12 months. Things to consider: is there value-added in remediating the existing installation to the "as-designed" con?rguration? Does the UL listing or UL rating of this installationfapplication bring additional value to the ?retlife safety intent? Does the existing installation (along with any mitigating actions) bring this installation to a ?code-equivalent" condition of performance? Please let me know if you have any additional comments or questions. vir, Jeff Williams Deputy Director Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) Buildings 81. Facilities Of?ce 770.433.3039 From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:54 AM To: Williams, Jeffery Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDQOCDDIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI From: Stockton, Patrick (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:27 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Sanchez, Anthony Zambuto, Laura R. Subject: Vivarium {bus} 42 use. Eagaii'has-eom attention that Karen Moss is requesting more delays for the programs regarding the operations of the Vivarium in Apparently there are some ?re damper issues that will require entry into yiyarium animal space. My question is why is this being brought up know and again delaying the programs. Apparently it was known earlier and an attempt was made to get the contractor in to make the repairs before they went hot. It looks like they are now trying to get back in again tomorrow to complete or ?nish the Flu has been planning all week to go hot tomorrow (28JAN2U1 1) with appropriate notices sent out. I would like to ?nd out if all attempts have been made to have this work done today or after hours tonight so as to not delay the programs. We had delays last week and down 'time all of this week to make repalrs. Thanks Fl Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Sunday. January 30, 2011 7:02 PM To: (escrommeezm); (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) Subject: Fw: Vivarium Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: Lingler, Arthur R. Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George Sent: Sun Jan 30 19:00:42 2011 Subject: Re: Vivarium Thank you Ari! Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Lingler, Arthur R. To: Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George Sent: Sun Jan 30 13:43:49 2011 Subject: Re: Vivarium Work is complete. Art Lingler Sent from my Blast-(Berry Wireless Device From: Lingler, Arthur R. To: Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Fri Jan 28 16:32:56 2011 Subject: Re: Vivarium I am arranging with WMI to complete remediation before Monday. Art Lingler Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless From: Williams, Jeffery To: Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George Sent: Fri Jan 28 16:02:24 2011 Subject: RE: Vivarium Team, I have discussed this issue with the team, and we have determined that it would be prudent and most practical to mitigate this issue as much as possible without signi?cantly delaying the program any further. Upon reviewing the design, speci?cations, cut-sheets. and actual installation, lwould contend that the installation of the three assemblies (including mitigation listed below) essentially meets the intent of the applicable ?re safety codes. I would also contend (barring any additional items} that facilities turnover to can be achieved NLT Monday, January 31, 2011. This determination does not offer an interpretation on the compliancy of said installation to the letter of applicable codes and standards based on o?iciai contract documents. Mitigation: Since the issue is with the ?re rating (UL Fire Rated Assemblies) of the complete assembly and the ability to serve as a barrier against smokel?re propagation throughout the space, as the AHJ I feel it would be prudent to provide a layer of intumescent ?re caulking (equivalent the rating of the assembly) bettveen the damper sleeve, diffuser sleeve, and the ?backing? sleeve that was ?eld-installed against the coredigrouted slab. The following is a list of other actions required to settle this issue from a code compliancy and contract adherence viewpoint. - Identify and document any possible non-conformances in detail and provide to P60 for disposition. We should itemize each issue and specific location of possible non?conformances or de?ciencies, and prepare draft scope and IGE required to remediate. It will be up to P80 to enforce such de?ciencies by withholding payment, extending contract period, etc., as long as we clearly identify the technical details and speci?c areas of non-conformance or non-compliance. - As AHJ. have determined that this particular de?ciency does not rise to the level of placing personnel or property at I risk {given the location of the installations, mitigating factors, etc), and will write an of?cial temporary waiver with mandatory mitigations included. The mitigations will include returning to the installation in 12 months (or whenever an outage is offered) and performing correctionslremediation, etc. to meet the full intent and requirements of the design and all applicable codes and standards. - I would like the project technical team and all necessary stakeholders to meet within the next 3 weeks to determine the extent to which a full remediation is required in 12 months. Things to consider: is there value-added in remediating the existing installation to the "as-designed? con?rguration? Does the UL listing or UL rating of this installationlapplication bring additional value to the ?rellife safety intent? Does the existing installation (along with any mitigating actions} bring this installation to a "code?equivalent" condition of performance? Please let me know if you have any additional comments or questions. vir, Jeff Williams Deputy Director Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) Buildings 8; Facilities Of?ce T70.488.8089 From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:54 AM To: Williams, Jeffery Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI From: Half-t- (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) Sent: Thursday, January 2011 10:27 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Zambuto, Laura R. Subject: Vivarium It has oom In my attention that Karen Moss is requesting more delays for the programs regarding the operations of the yiyarium in Apparently there are some fire damper issues thatwill require entry into yiyarium animal space. My question is why is this being brought up know and again delaying the programs. Apparently it was known earlier and an attempt was made to get the contractor in to make the repairs before they went hot. It looks like they are now trying to get back in again tomorrow to complete or ?nish the [El has been planning all week to go hot tomorrow (23JAN201 1) with appropriate notices sent out, I would like to ?nd out if all attempts have been'made to have this work done today or after hours tonight so as to not delay the programs. We had delays last week and down time all of this week to make repairs. Thanks i3. 42 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 7:01 PM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Prehst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium Thank you Art! Jeff Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Lingler, Arthur R. - To: Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George (CDCIDCDOXBFO) Sent: Sun Jan 30 18:43:49 2011 Subject: Re: Vivarium Work is complete. Art Lingler Sent from my BIackBerry Wireless Device From: Lingler, Arthur R. To: Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George Sent: Fri Jan 23 16:32:56 2011 Subject: Re: Vivarium I Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) i am arranging with WMI to complete remediation before Monday. Art Lingler Sent from my BIaokBerryr Wireless Device From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOJBFO) To: Prehst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice (3. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George Sent: Fri Jan 28 16:02:24 2011 Subject: RE: Vivarium Team. I have discussed this issue with the team, and we have determined that it would be prudent and most practical to mitigate this issue as much as possible without signi?cantly deiaying the program any further. Upon reviewing the design, speci?cations, cut-sheets, and actual installation, I would contend that the installation of the three assemblies (including mitigation listed below) essentially meets the intent of the applicable ?re safety codes. i would also contend (barring any additional items} that facilities turnover to can be achieved NLT Monday. January 31, 2011. This determination does not offer an interpretation on the compiiancy of said installation to the letter of applicable codes and standards based on c??iciai contract documents. mam Since the issue is with the ?re rating Fire Rated Assemblies) of the complete assembly and the ability to serve as a barrier against smoket?re propagation throughout the space, as the AHJ feel it would be prudent to provide a layer of intumescent ?re caulking (equivalent the rating of the assembly} between the damper sleeve, diffuser sleeve, and the "backing" sleeve that was ?eld-installed against the coredigrouted slab. The following is a list of other actions required to settle this issue from a code compliancy and contract adherence viewpoint. - identify and document any possible non-conformances in detail and provide to P60 for disposition. We should itemize each issue and speci?c location of possible non-conformances or de?ciencies, and prepare draft scope and IGE required to remediate. It will be up to PGO to enforce such de?ciencies by withholding payment, extending contract period, etc., as long as we clearly identify the technical details and speci?c areas at non?conformance or non-compliance. - As AHJ, have determined that this particular de?ciency does not rise to the level of placing personnel or property at risk (given the location of the installations, mitigating factors, etc), and will write an of?cial temporary waiver with mandatory mitigations included. The mitigations will include returning to the installation in 12 months (or whenever an outage is offered) and performing correctionsiremediation, etc. to meet the full intent and requirements of the design and all applicable codes and standards. I would like the project technical team and all necessary stakeholders to meet within the next 3 weeks to determine the extent to which a full remediation is required in 12 months. Things to consider: is there valueradded in remediating the existing installation to the "as-designed" con?rguration? Does the UL listing or UL rating of this installationiapplication bring additional value to the iirellife safety intent? Does the existing installation (along with any mitigating actions) bring this installation to a ?code-equivalent? condition of performance? Please let me know if you have any additional comments or questions. vtr, Jeff Williams Deputy Director Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) Buildings 2: Facilities Of?ce 770.488.8039 From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, January 27', 2011 10:54 AM To: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI E: '1 a Sent: Thursday, January 2011 10:27 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Howard, William (em) moreL's-Utmhi Zambuto, Laura a. (CD NCIRD) Subject: Vivarium - - my attention that Karen Moss is requesting more delays for the programs regarding the operations wyanumi Apparently there are some ?re damper Issues that will regurre entry Into wyarlum animal space. My question is why is this being brought up know and again delaying the programs. Apparently it was known earlier and an attern pt? was made to get the contractor in to make the repairs before they went hot. It looks like they are now trying to get back in again tomorrow to complete or ?nish the fix. has been planning all week to go hot tomorrow (28JAN2011) with appropriate notices sent out. I would like to ?nd out if all attempts have been made to have this work done today or after hours tonight so as to not delay the programs. We had delays last week and downtime all of this Week to make repairs. Thanks El Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCDOJBFQ Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 6:44 PM To: Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George Subject: Re: Vivarium Work is complete. Art Lingler Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device From: Lingler, Arthur R. To: Williams, Jeffery Paul E. Moss, Karen Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George Sent: Fri Jan 28 15:32:55 2011 Subject: Re: Vivarium I am arranging with WMI to complete remediation before Monday. Art Lingler Sent from my BiackBerry Wireless Device From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOXBFO) To: Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George Sent: Fri Jan 28 15:02:24 2011 . Subject: RE: Vivarium Team, I have discussed this issue with the team, and we have determined that it would be prudent and most practical to mitigate this issue as much as possible without significantly delaying the program any further. Upon reviewing the design, speci?cations, cut-sheets, and actual installation, I would contend that the installation of the three assemblies (including mitigation listed below) essentially meets the intent of the applicable ?re safety codes. I would also contend (barring any additional items) that facilities turnover to operationsiprogram can be achieved NLT Monday, January 31, 2011. This determination does not offer an interpretation on the compiiancy of said instal'iation to the fetter of appiicabie codes and standards based on officiat contract documents. Mitigation: Since the issue is with the ?re rating (UL Fire Rated Assembties) of the complete assemth and the ability to serve as a barrier against smokei?re propagation throughout the space, as the AHJ feel it would be prudent to provide a layer of intumescent tire caulking (equivalent the rating of the assembly) between the damper sleeve, diffuser sleeve, and the I "backing" sleeve that was ?eldrinstailed against the coredi'grouted slab. The following is a list of other actions required to settle this issue from a code compliancy and contract adherence viewpoint. Identify and document any possible non-conformances in detail and provide to PGO for disposition. We should itemize each issue and speci?c location of possibie nonsconforrnances or de?ciencies, and prepare draft scope and required to remediate. It will be up to PGO to enforce such de?ciencies by withholding payment, extending contract period, etc, as long as we clearly identify the technical detaiis and speci?c areas of non-conformance or non-compliance. As AHJ, have determined that this particutar deficiency does not rise to the level of placing personnel or property at risk (given the location of the installations, mitigating factors, etc), and will write an of?cial temporary waiver with mandatory mitigations included. The mitigations will include returning to the installation in 12 months (or whenever an outage is offered) and performing correctionsiremediation, etc. to meet the full intent and requirements of the design and i all applicable codes and standards. - I would like the project technical team and ali necessary stakeholders to meet within the next 3 weeks to determine the extent to which a full remediation is required in 12 months. Things to consider: is there value-added in remediating the existing installation to the "as-designed? con?rguration? Does the UL listing or UL rating of this installationiapplication I bring additional value to the ?reflife safety intent? Does the existing installation (along with any mitigating actions) bring this installation to a ?code-equivalent" condition of performance? Please iet me know if you have any additional comments or questions. vfr, Jeff Williams Deputy Director Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) Buildings 8; Facilities Of?ce From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 2011 10:54 AM To: Williams, Jeffery (CDCKOCOOJBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI 1 . ?p (CDCIOCOUIOSHE) Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:27 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXBFOJ Cc: Howard, William (Bili) (CDCIOCOOIDSHE) imam Zambuto, Laura R. Subject: Vivarium It has come to my attention that Karen Moss is requesting more delays for the programs regarding the operations of the vivarium in Apparently there are some ?re damper issues that will require entry into vivarium animal space. My question is why is this being brought Up know and again delaying the programs. Apparently it was known earlier and an attempt was made to get the contractor in to make the repairs before they went hot. It looks iike they are now trying to get back in again tomorrow to complete or ?nish the has been planning all week to go hot tomorrow (28JAN2011) 2 with appropriate notices sent out. I would like to ?nd out if all attempts have been made to have this work done today or after hours tonight so as to not delay the programs. We had delays last week and down time all of this week to make repairs. - Thanks [El Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Lingler, Arthur R. Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 4:33 PM To: Williams, Jeffery Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George - Subject: Re: Vivarium I am arranging with lell to complete remediation before Monday. Art Lingler Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device From: Williams, Jeffery To: Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Lingier, Arthur R. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO), Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Bianchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George Sent: Fri Jan 28 16:02:24 2011 Subject: RE: Vivarium Team, I have discussed this issue with the team, and we have determined that it would be prudent and most practical to mitigate this issue as much as possible without significantly delaying the program any further. Upon reviewing the design, speci?cations, cut-sheets, and actual installation, I would contend that the installation of the three assemblies (including mitigation listed below) essentially meets the intent of the applicable fire safety codes. I would also contend (barring any additional items) that turnover to operationsiprogram can be achieved NLT Monday, January 31, 2011. This detennination does not offer an interpretation on the compiiancy of said instaiiation to the ietter of applicabie codes and standards based on ofiicial contract documents. Mitigation: Since the issue is with the tire rating (UL Fire Rated Assembiies) of the complete assembly and the ability to serve as a barrier against smokei?re propagation throughout the space, as the AHJ i feel it would be prudent to provide a layer of intumescent ?re caulking (equivalent the rating of the assembly) between the damper sleeve, diffuser sleeve, and the "backing" sleeve that was ?eld-installed against the coredigrouted slab. The following is a list of other actions required to settle this issue from a code compliancy and contract adherence viewpoint. Identify and document any possible nonconformances in detail and provide to PGO for disposition. We should itemize each issue and specific location of possible non-conformances or de?ciencies, and prepare draft scope and IGE required to remediate. It will be up to P60 to enforce such de?ciencies by withholding payment, extending contract period, etc., as long as we clearly identify the technical details and speci?c areas of non-conformance or non-compliance. - As AHJ, have determined that this particular de?ciency does not rise to the level of placing personnel or property at risk (given the location of the installations, mitigating factors, etc), and will write an of?cial temporary waiver with mandatory mitigations included. The mitigations will include returning to the installation in 12 months (orwhenever an outage is offered) and performing correctionsiremediation, etc. to meet the full intent and requirements of the design and all applicable codes and standards. - I would like the project technical team and all necessary stakeholders to meet within the next 3 weeks to determine the extent to which a full remediation is required in 12 months. Things to considen is there value-added in remediating the existing installation to the ?as-designed" con?rguration? Does the UL listing or UL rating of this installationl'application bring additional value to the ?reflife safety intent? Does the existing installation (along with any mitigating actions) bring this installation to a ?code-equivalent" condition of performance? Please let me know if you have any additional comments or questions. w?r, Jeff Williams Deputy Director Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) Buildings Facilities Of?ce 770.438.8089 From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:54 AM To: Williams, Jeffery Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI ..4 From: I a. Sent: Thursday, January 2011 10:27 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Zambuto, Laura Ft. (CDCJOIDINCIRD) Subject: Vivarium @2023th- It has come to my attention that Karen Moss is requesting more delays for the programs regarding the operations of the yiyarium Apparently there are some ?re damper issues that will require entry into Vivarium animal space. My question is why is this being brought up know and again delaying the programs. Apparently it was known earlier and an attempt was made to get the contractor in to make the repairs before they went hot. It looks like they are now trying to get back in again tomorrow to complete or ?nish the fix. has been planning all week to go hot tomorrow (28JAN2011) with appropriate notices sent out. I would like to ?nd out if all attempts have been made to have this work done today or after hours tonight so as to not delay the programs. We had delays last week and down time all of this week to make repairs. Thanks Mathe, Chester From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Frida Janua 2B, 2011 4:21 PM To: _l Cc: Bowen. Ken L. Howard. William (Bill) Zambuto, Laura R. Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: Vivarium The vivariurn will be ready to be re-occUpied by the program on Monday morning, 1131r2o1 1. The space is essentially ready now with one minor activity to be performed this weekend in the interstitial. Every attempt has been made to ensure that delays are kept to a minimum. The project team has compressed schedule activities, extended working hours, fabrication schedules. etc. over the last several months in order to deliver this space as promised. We are always diligent in ensuring that quality controliassurance is performed thoroughly in all phases of execution and this sometimes presents us with tough circumstances and decisions. We do understand and appreciate the importance of your mission and apologize for any inconveniences this may have caused the program. Thanks again for your patience. J- Jeff WHI?ams Deputy Director 110.488.3089 678.61 8.2 169 From: Probst,r Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 23', 2011 10:54 AM To: Williams, Jeffery Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium From: Emil-?ag Sent: Thursday, January 2011 10:27 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Subject: Vivarium a (cosmic/nears); Zambuto, Laura R. It has come to my attention that Karen Moss is requesting more delays for the programs regarding the operations of the vivarium Apparently there are some fire damper issues that will require entry into vivarium animai space. My question is why is this being brought up know and again delaying the programs. Apparently it was known earlier and an attempt was made to get the contractor in to make the repairs before they went hot. It looks like they are now trying to get back in again tomorrow to complete or ?nish the has been planning all week to go hot tomorrow (28JAN201 1) with appropriate notices sent out. i would like to ?nd out it all attempts have been made to have this work done today or after hours tonight so as to not delay the programs. We had delays East week and down time all of this week to make repairs. Thanks Maths, Chester From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 4:02 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George Subject: RE: Vivarium Team, 1 have discussed this issue with the team, and we have determined that it would be prudent and most practical to mitigate this issue as much as possible without signi?cantly delaying the program any further. Upon reviewing the design, specifications, cut?sheets, and actual installation, I would contend that the installation of the three assemblies (including mitigation listed below} essentially meets the intent of the applicable fire safety codes. I would also contend (barring any additional items} that facilities turnover to operationsiprogram can be achieved NLT Monday, January 31, 2011. This determination does not offer an interpretation on the compiiancy of said instaiiation to the letter of appiicabie codes and standards based on of?cial contract documents. Mitigation: Since the issue is with the ?re rating Fire Rated Assembiies} of the complete assembly and the ability to serve as a barrier against smokei?re propagation throughout the space, as the AHJ feel it would be prudent to provide a layer of intumescent ?re caulking {equivalent the rating of the assembly) between the damper sleeve, diffuser sleeve, and the ?backing? sleeve that was field-installed against the coredigrouted siab. The following is a list of other actions required to settle this issue from a code compliancy and contract adherence viewpoint. a Identify and document any possible non-conformances in detail and provide to P80 for disposition. We should itemize each issue and specific location of possible non-conformances or deficiencies, and prepare draft scope and required to remediate. It will be up to PGO to enforce such deficiencies by withholding payment, extending contract period, etc.. as long as we clearly identify the technical details and speci?c areas of non- conformance or non-compliance. - As AHJ, have determined that this particular deficiency does not rise to the level of placing personnel or property at risk (given the location of the installations, mitigating factors, etc), and will write an official temporary waiver with mandatory mitigations included. The mitigations will include returning to the installation in 12 months (or whenever an outage is offered) and performing correctionsiremediation, etc. to meet the full intent and requirements of the design and all applicable codes and standards. I would like the project technical team and all necessary stakeholders to meet within the next 3 weeks to determine the extent to which a full remediation is required in 12 months. Things to consider: is there value- added in remediating the existing installation to the ?as?designed? confirguration? Does the UL listing or UL rating of this installationiapplication bring additional value to the fireilife safety intent? Does the existing installation (along with any mitigating actions) bring this installation to a ?code?equivalent? condition of performance? Please let me know if you have any additional comments or questions. vir, Jeff Williams Deputy Director Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ). Buildings 8 Facilities Office 770.488.8889 From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 2011 10:54 AM To: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI Sent: Thursday, January 2011 10:27 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Zambuto, Laura R. Subject: Vivarium It has come to my attention that Karen Moss is requesting more delays for the programs regarding the operations of the giggil?iya?uinin El Apparently there are some ?re damper issues that will require entry into Iiriyarium animal space. My question is why is this being brought up know and again delaying the programs. Apparently it was known earlier and an attempt was made to get the contractor in to make the repairs before they went hot. It looks like they are now trying to get back in again tomorrow to complete or ?nish the EEI has been planning all week to go hot tomorrow (28JAN2011) with appropriate notices sent out. I would like to ?nd out if all attempts have been made to have this work done today or after hours tonight so as to not delay the programs. We had delays last week and down time all of this week to make repairs. Thanks [El Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 11:45 AM To: Raymond. George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Ii . FW Dmvanurn gress FYI Thanks, Paul Probst From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, January 20,r 2011 8:18 AM To: Williams Jeffery Vivarium Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report. It is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 Ibf and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 Ibf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA-EDOO is the current version of the code. Section 12.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 Ibf. Since the project modi?ed air a flow to the system. we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with 7" the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Atta ents: 1. Cx Report 2. NFPA 101 2000 3. ASHRAE Formula I I AAIMBH - CDC NFPA 101 - ashrae formula.de was 2am-de A 5 I For ease of reference. this is what the Ex report states: ?The Commissioning (ij Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress-is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the eXcessive negative pressure 1 prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushfpull the door inwardleubwerd before turning the handle and opening the deer.? air analysis of atlanta, inc. 1520 pine log rd conyers, ga 30011 (T70) 929-3165 (WEI) 4833365 fax hyao consulting test and balance commissioning December 28, 2010 Karen Moss, PE CDC Building 18 Lab Renovation Cx Functional Test Documentation AtlantaFunctional Tests Documentation: 1. Fail by throwing disconnect on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position damper closes and exhaust plenum static control damper modulates to maintain static pressure set point w.c. for the exhaust system Eyes _no. ?9 maintains pro-failure operating conditions 3 yes All labs maintain requrred directional air?ow 5 yes _no. 2. Restoreinto operation and allow system to stabilize. 3. Fall by throwing disconnect on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position damper closes and exhaust plenum static control damper modulates to mainta'n static pressure set point w.c. tor the exhaust system 3 yes _no. maintains pro-failure operating conditions 5 yes _no. All labs maintain required directional air?ow 3 yes _no. 4. Fall one fan A on . Expected results: The remaining - supply fan continues to operate and the VFD speeds up and maintains supply duct static pressure set point Ewe. forthe supply air system; yes _no. Both - - continue to operate normally yes _no. All labs maintain required di air?ow 3 yes, _no. 5. Restore to normal operation and allow system to stabilize. 6. Fail one fan xected results: The remaining U550- supply fan continues to operate and the VFD speeds up and maintains supply duc pressure set point Ewe. for the supply air system_)_( yes _no, Both continue to operate normally Eyes _no. All tabs maintain required directional air?ow 5 yes no. 7. Restore the system to normal operation. by throwing disconnects on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position damer closes and exhaust plenum static control damper closes. 5 yes _no shuts down both supply airfans and related isolation dampers. A yes _no. All tabs required directional airflow is not maintained. 5 yes _no. 9- 10. 11. Notes: Restore the system to normal operation. Fail fans on IE. Expected results: continUes to operate shuts down. Both exhaust fan plenum dampers open 100%. )3 yes_ no. Lab suite maintains negative pressure to surrounding areas, 5 yes _no. All lab directional air flow is not maintained _ves X_m no. Required strength to open exit doors from the lab suite is acceptable per NFPA 101 code for egress of occupants _yes, (2, 31 no. Kill powerto all four fans simultaneoust was suggested. Exgected results: Lab suite directional air?ow is not maintained yes _no. Airflow patterns in the suits are directional to the cage wash area 5 yes _no. (1) Total containment is maintained and all directional air?ow is into the labs. (2) Upon dual supply fan shut down1 egress from the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable (3) (4) by CDCIBFOIDEMO. The Commissioning (Cir) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also. on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushfpull the door inwardfoutward before turning the handle and opening the door. Pressure Differentials across Suite Egress Doors y. (pirate so. 53 2625s.; FirelSmoke Mode was not commissioned. During FiremeoI-re Mode. dual supply fan shut down is commanded and stairwell pressurization fans start up and run. Exhaust fans run as described in 9 of the C): Report. The combination of excessive negative pressure on the lab ?oor and the pressurization of stairwells in FirelSmoke Mode would cause the door opening forces mentioned in item #2 to increase signi?cantly. Air Analysis of Atlanta was informed by that the assumes responsibility for accepting the Vivarium to be reopened with known code violation. and CDCIBFOIFMEO will initiate a separate project to address this issue?. sent-6314mm MEANS OF EGRESS pair of doors is provided, not less than one of the doors shall provide not less than a 32-in. clear width opening. :ceptieu No. 1: Exit access dam: seruinga were not exceeding Mfr: (5.57112) and not required to be accessible to persons with severe umbil- ity shall be not less than 24 in. (61 cm} in door leaf width. Exception No. 2: Doors swing a building or portion thercty? not re- quinzd to be accessibb: to persons with scum mobility impairments shall bepcrmitted door leafwidlh. Exception No. 3: In axistigg buildings, the existing door leaf width ii less than 28 in. (71 cm). No. 4: This requirement shall not apply as otherwise pm- aided in Chapter: 22 end 23. Exception Na. 5: This not ugly to interior dam as molded in Chapter 24. opening shall be the minimum 32-bit. singleJeef requth in occarcloucc with Exception No. 2 to 72.2.1.9. Execution Na. This requiutmml shall not apply to revolving doors otfn?ovidcd in 22.1.10. 7.2.1.3 Floor Level. The. elevation of the ?oor surfaces on $19ng sides_oLa door shall not vary by more than Us in. (1.3 cm]. The elevation shall be maintained on hoth sides of the doorway for a distance not less than the width of the widest leaf. Thresholds at doorways shall not exceed 1/5 in. {1.5 cm) in height. Raised dlresholds and floor level changes in excess oil-f; in. {0.64 cm) at doontrays shall he bevelled with aslope notsteeuer than 1 in 2. Establish No. i: In one? two?femibg dwellings and in existing building: Itth the: door discharges to the outside or to cm mutter bel- wfij or exit access, the?uor level outside the be p.51: mind to be one step lower than the inside, but shall not be in excess of 3 in. (20.3m) lower.? Misha Nb. 2: In one and tub-family dwellings and existing build- 0 F?ttf. ti door at the top oft: stair shall be permitted to open directly at 515"] Will-?Ed that the door does not ?tting over the stair and the duor 5' A. an area with an occupant loud ty'fewer than .50 persons. 12.1.? Swing and Force to Open. dill? door in a means of egress shall be of the side- type. The door shall he designed . .?150 that It. 1s capable of mug,ng [tom an.)r position required of the opening in which it is {Hiding doors as provided in Chapters 22 and 23. in Chapters 24, 32, and 33. 5'9- permitted in Chapters 12 thew-git 42, hm; ?Wilma! rolling scour-i9 grilles or doors that me port shall be permitted, provided that they shell tel-main secured in the full open occupancy by the general publi c. 01' deer; time shall be readily nit- less than I in. {2.5 cm.) high on. a com os?llowsF5- ?fF' 7' an?: JillException No. 6: A power-operated door lcoflocotccl within. a two?leaf I $121.42 Doom required to be of the or pivoted- During its swing, an}! door in a means of egress 1. shall leave not less than one?half of the required width of an 515,5 The forces-required to hill}.F open any dooi' manually are means of egress-shall not exceed 15 lhl? to nelease No. in existing dxbce?d-?? M222 till-applied to tabs-sets. 101?45 D0013 0r grilles shall be operable from within the space without the use ofenj special or c?brt. Whore two or moo: mans ofcgress ore inquired, not more than means Lifeg'l?tli's shall be cguWyed with horizontal sliding or vertical rolling grille: or icon. Exception No. 3: Hoi-imtoi sliding doors with 12.1.14 shall be permitted. Excqb?en Na. 4: Door: to ptiuote gorogct, business areas, industrial areas, and storage arms with on new}:th land not exceeding 10, where such pn'octc garages, business areas, industrial areas, and stor? age urea: contain low or entitle!) hazard contents, shall be exempt ?rm: this mguhemcnt. Exception No. 5: Revolving doom compgging with 12.1.10 shall be permitted. Na. d: Existiugfusiblc link-operated horizontal sliding or ucgticol miling?rc dams shall be permitted to be used as Widen: in Chapter: 12 through 42. nun-u. . pt ?anyway 4.5.ug-uuquraaumuawu swinging type shall sitting in the direction of as travel where serving a rootu?'r area w?i an occupant load of 50 or more. rim Exception No. 1: Doors in horizontal exits shall not be rcpuiiecl to swing in the direction travel tuba-m exempted in 22.4.3.6. Exception No. 2: Sm obs barrier doors shall not be required to aging in the direction ofcgress lmocl as provided in Chapter 19. 7 1.1.4.3 A door shall swing in the direction of egress travel where used in an exit enclosure or where serving a high liar and contents area, unless it is a door from an individual living unit that opens directly into an exit enclosure. say?J- aisle, corridor, passageway, or landing unobstructed and shall not project more an in. cm) into the required width of an aisle, corn' doc, passageway, or landing, when fully open. Doors shall not en direct] onto a stair without a landiu . The landmg shall have a width not less than the width of die door. (See Exception: In existing buildings, at door WMdl?g access to stoic shall not be mquired to maintain any minimum unobstructed width during its ?tting; provided that it meets the reguin that limits pru- jccticm. to ?t ?one than 7 in. 28 cm) into the required width ofo 3. steirorionding when the door is?illy open. thelatch, 3D gig; {133 N) to set the door in motion, and 15 FBI to open the door to the mhiir'num required width. Opening forces for interior side-hinged or pivoted-sadnging .doors without closers shall not exceed 5 lbf- 522 N). These forces shall be applied at the latch stile. Eiticptim No. 2: The bmitontdl shall be as provided in Chapter: 22 and 23. Exception No. 3: The doors shall be esprovidcd in 7.2.1.413 Screen doors aod,storm doors used in a means of egress shall he subg'ect to the requirements for direction of swing that are applicable to other doors used in a means of egress. a new I w? 2on0 Edition -- - RNthA'M-Nm'li" 52.6 Examples 2 and 3 demonstrate that the air needed to prevent smoke back?ow can support an extremely large ?re. Most com- mercial and residential buildings contain enough fuel (paper, card? board, furniture, etc.) to support very large ?res. Even when the amount of fuel is normally very small, short-term fuel loads (dur? ing building renovation, material delivery, etc.) can be. signi?cant. Therefore, using air?ow for smoke control is not recommended, except when the ?re is suppressed or in the rare cases when ?iel can be restricted with con?dence. Example 2. What airflow at a doorway is needed to stop smoke back?mv from a room fully involved in fire, and how large a ?re can this air?ow support? A room full involved in ?re can have an energy release rate on the order of Built. Adsume the door is 3 ft wide and it high. From Equation (Ill). v, seats a 105:3)? ran rpm. a ?ow through the doorway of 1'90 3! 3 3? 16,500 c?u is needed to prevent smoke from haektlowin into the area. If all the oxygen in this air?ow is consumed in the ?re, the heat lib- crated is l6,600 $850 Btuih-eftn= 9.7 ill"r Earth. This is over It] times more than the heat generated by the fully involved room ?re and indicates why air?ow is generally not remrnmended for smoke control in buildings. Example 3. What air?ow is needed to stop smoke backllow from a waste- basket ?re, and how large a ?re can this air?ow support? A wastcbasket ?re can have an energy release rate on the order of 5 a: in Example 2, t; scars 9: rose)? no rpm. a ?ow through the doonvay need ed to prevent smoke back flow. If all the oxygen in this air?ow is consumed in the ?re, the heat lib- crated is tiStlU mm 5350 smut-can as a to1 Bush. This is out many greater than the fully involved room ?re and further indi- cates why air?ow is generally not recommended for smoke control in buildings. Buoyancy The buoyancy of hot combustion gases is used in both. fan? powered and non-fan-powcred venting systems. Fan-powered venting for large spaces is commonly used for atriums and cov- ered shopping malls, and non?fan-powered venting is commonly used for large industrial and storage buildings. There is a concern that sprinkler ?ow will cool the smoke, reducing buoyancy and thus the system effectiveness. Research is needed in this area. Refer to Klote and Milka {2-302} and NFPA Standards 9213 and 204 for detailed design information about these systems. SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN Do or-Op ening Forces The door?opening forces resulting from the pressure differences pro dneedby a smoke control system must be considered. Unre ason- ably high door?openin forces can make it di?icult or impossible for occupants to open doors to refuge areas or escape routes. The force required to open the forces to over- come the pressure difference across the door and to overcome the door closer. This can be expressed as snow an F: ?it star?a) (In whom total door-opening force, ch force to overcome door closer, lbI door width, ft A doorarea, lit2 up presstne difference across door. in. of water distance from doorloroh to edge ot'ltnob side ofdoor, ft This relation assumes that the door-opening force is applied at the knob. Door-opening force FF caused by pressure difference can an 07 saunas Handbook?HVAC Applicatitt PRESSURE DIFFERENCE in. of water Fig. Der?Opening Force Caused by Pressure DilTeren on be determined from Figure for a value of 3 in. The force to overcome the door closer is usually greater titan 3 and, in some cases, can be as great as 201b,; For a door that is ft high and 3 ft. wide and subject to a pressure di?ercnce of??l} in. of water, the total door-opening force is 30 if the force to overcome the door closer is 12 lbr. Flow Areas In designing smoke control systems, air?ow paths must be iden-' ti?ed and evaluated. Some leakage paths are obvious, such as cracks aroUIld closed doors, open doors, elevator doors, windows, and air transfer grilles. Construction cracks in building walls are less obvi'u one, but they are equally important. The ?ow area ofmost large openings, such as open windows, can be calculated easily. However, flow areas of cracks are more dif?cult to evaluate. The area of these leakage paths depends on such features as workmanship, door and weeds erstrippin g. A 3 by it door with an average crack width of US in. has a leakage area of 0.21 How- ever, if this door is installed with a 3M in. undercut, the leakage area is 0.3 5 a signi?cant di?'etencc. The leakage area of elevator doors is in the range of 0.55 to DJG it2 per door. For open stairwell doorways, Cresei (1973) found complex flow patterns; the resulting ?ow through open doomrays was considerably below that calculated nsin the doorway's geometric area as the ?ow area in Equation Based on this research, it is recommended that the design ?ow area ofau open stairwell doorway be half the geomcl- ric area (door height width) ofthe doorway. Art altemadve for open stairwell doorways is to use the geometric area as the ?ow area and use a reduced flow coe?icient. Because it do es not allow the direct use of Equation (8), this approach is not used here: Typical leakage areas for walls, and ?oors-of commercial build: logs are tabulated as area ratios in Table 1. Those data-arc based on a relatively small number of tests performed by the National Research Council cl" Canada (Show ct al. 1993; Tamura and Show 1976a, lQi?tib. 1978; Tamera and Wilson 1966]. Actualleakagearcas depend primarily on workmanship rather than on construction mate- rials, and in some cases, the ?ow areas in particular buildings may vary From the values listed Data concerning air leakage through building components are also provided irt Chapter of the 2005 ASHRAE Handbook?Fundamentals. Because a vent surface is usually covered by a louver and screen. :1 vent?s flow area is less than its area {vent height I width). Calculation Mathe, Chester From: Williams. Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday. January 27, 2011 12:57 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: Fire Damper installation Issue Paul. Could you give Karen a call on cell asap. Her number is below. Thanks Jeff 404325.882? Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: Probst, Paul E. To: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCUOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Thu Jan 27 10:54:23 2011 Subject: FW: Fire Damper Installation Issue Jeff: I am training today, so this is a hurried e-mail. I received call from Karen yesterday about a de?ciency that she noted regarding the ?re damper installation. 1 have not researched this issue. and do not profess to be an expert on the technical details. Karen indicated that the contractor was developing a plan for the including scope and schedule. Bottom line if this remedial work cannot be done prior to going hot, i am suggesting that monies be withheld and the work be done at next shutdown 12 months from now. Possible problems: 1) is current installation unsafe? and 2) plan was to be hot tomorrow. i am sending this to you for two reasonsauthoritative position over Karen and Art; therefore, I am not in a capacity to direct their efforts. and 2) you are the AHJ. This is the 1St of three e-mails I am sending that will enlighten you to the extent that I am. Paul Probst From: Moss, Karen Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 6:00 PM To: Prohst, Paul E. Subject: Fire Damper Installation Issue Paul, See attached. ?Fire Damper Installation Issue. pdf>> Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404-525-632? Fax: email: Mathe, Chester (0000000039) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 2011 10:54 AM To: Wiiliams, Jeffery (CDQIOCOOIBFO) Co: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Subject: FW: Ferrets in Vivarium FYI From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOKBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:42 AM To: Lingler, Arthur R. Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Ferrets in Vivarium ArtiKaren: Looks like they are planning to go hot tomorrow. If the remedial work on the fire dampers cannot be completed by then, appears next chance will 12 months from now. Paul roadie From: Hr - CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Thursday, January 2011 10:36 AM To: Prohst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Fw: Ferrets in Vivarium From: Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDINCIRD) Sent: Tuesdav January 25, 2011 1:52 Subject: Ferrets in Vivarium Ihil'3i242 USC. 262mm (CDCIOI We moved some ferrets into the Vivarium today, we plan on inoculating them on Friday. Laura Mathe. Chester {coprocoorosem From: Prohst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOEFO) Sent: Thursday, January 2011 10:54 AM To: Williams, Jeffery Co: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI From: (CDCKOCOOJOSHE) Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011. 10:27 AM To: Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) Zambuto, Laura R. Subject: l.l'iyarium It has some to my attention that Karen Moss is requesting more delays for the programs regarding the operations of the Vivarium in Apparently there are some ?re damper issues that will require entry into yivarium animal space. My question is why is this being brought up know and again delaying the programs. Apparently it was known earlier and an attempt was made to get the contractor in to make the repairs before they went hot. It looks like they are now trying to get back in again tomorrow to complete or ?nish the has been planning all week to go hot tomorrow 1) with appropriate notices sent out. i would like to ?nd out if all attempts have been made to have this work done today or after hours tonight so as to not delay the programs. We had delays last week and down time all of this week to make repairs. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 27. 2011 10:42 AM To: Lingier, Arthur R. Moss, Karen Subject: FW: Ferrets in Vivarium ArUKaren: Looks like theyr are planning to go hot tomorrow. If the remedial work on the ?re dampers cannot be completed by then, appears next chance will 12 months from now. Paul From: (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:36 AM To: Prom-3tl Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXEIFO) Subject: FW: Ferrets in Vivarium From: Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDJNCIRD) Sen; To: . I Subject: Ferrets in Vivarium - and We moved some ferrets into the Vivarium today, we plan on inoculating them on Friday. 010! CEZID) Laura Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: Thursday. January 2011 10:27 AM To: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Cc: Howard. William (Bill) Imus-:42 use ?262th: Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDINCIRD) Subject: Vivarium it has corn my attention that Karen Moss is requesting more delays for the programs regarding the operations of the yiyarium in Apparently there are some ?re damper issues that will require entry into Vivarium animal space My question is why is this being brought Up know and again delaying the programs. Apparently it was known earlier and an attempt was made to get the contractor in to make the repairs before they went hot. It looks like they are now trying to get back in again tomorrow to complete or ?nish the has been planning all week to go hot tomorrow with appropriate notices sent out. i would like to ?nd out if all attempts have been made to have this work done today or after hours tonight so as to not delay the programs. We had delays last week and down time all of this week to make repairs. Thanks Ill Marthe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: .Frida Janua 21, 2011 To: I (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Zambuto, Laura R. Probsf. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium Pat, Sorry, I assumed Paul would follow up with you after I spoke with him yesterday. Yes, all mechanical and architectural work in the Vivarium is complete. There are only punch list items that need to be addressed in the interstitial space. Karen From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Frida Janua 21, 2011 10:49 AM To: (cocxocoorosus); Zambuto, Laura a. Cc: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCODIBFD) Subject: RE: VivariUm b: Laura: I saw Karen yesterday at the facility. She verbally indicated that the sealing of the penetration between the duct and slab was acceptable. I assumed she would follow-up to you via e-mail. Paul From {cocxocooxOSI-IE) Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:42 AM To: Zambuto, Laura R. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium Paul can you please check with Karen. We have been held up for quite some time now. Thanks From: Zambuto Laura R. (CDCIUIDINCIRD) To: (CDCIOCUOIOSHE) Sent: Fri Jan 21 10:36:25 2011 Subject: Vivarium (bli31'42 C. 26251'h We have some now. and need to get them over to 18. Thanks, Laura Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: (encrocoorOSJ-IE) Sent: Frlda .Janua 21,2011 10:57 AM To: (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Howard, William (Bill) Subject: Vivarlum Both OSHE and BFO have given the all clear for work to begin in the vivarlum. Programs should think about stocking supplies in the central corrldur before going hot. (by Laura has indicated they.' have ferrets 111 they would [Ike to get over to Let me know when it goes hat. Thanks El Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: 'll CDCIOCOOIDSHE) Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:50 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium She did not follow up. Thanks Paul. From: Probst Paul E. To: Zamhuto, Laura R. . oss, Sent: Fri Jan 21 10:48:53 2011 Subject: RE: Vivarium Pat! Laura: I saw Karen yesterday at the facility. She verbally indicated that the sealing of the penetration between the duct and slab was acceptable. I assumed she would follow-Up to you via e-msil. Paul From: cocrocoo/OSHE) Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:42 AM To: Zambuto, Laura R. Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOXBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium F'aul can you please check with Karen. We have been held up for quite some time now. Thanks Subject: Vivarium Pat, Any update on the Vivarium? We have some ferrets in Elnow. and need to get them over to .5 Thanks, Laura (bursa-42 i} 0 2523th Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFCI) Sent: Frida Janua 21, 2011 10:49 AM To: iml Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDINCIRDZI Cc: Moss, Karen Subject: RE: Vivarium Laura: 1 saw Karen yesterday at the facility. She verbally indicated that the sealing of the penetration between the duct and slab was acceptable. I assumed she would follow-up to you via e?mail. Paul . Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:42 AM To: 'Zambuto, Laura R. Probst, PauI E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium Paul can you please check with Karen. We have been held Up for quite some time now. Thanks From: Zambuto Laura R. (CDCIOIDINCIRD) Sent: Fri Jan 21 10:36:25 2011 Subject: Vivarium tbit3ii42 US (Jig Any update on the Vivarium? We have some ferrets inl: now, and need to get them over to 33231111 -- Thanks, Laura (bit31-42iu sc 5? 252m] - Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: 3.0. 262aih:- Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:42 AM To: Zambuto, Laura R. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium Paul can you piease check with Karen. We have been held up for quite some time now. Thanks . - Laura R. (CDCIOIDINCIRD) To: II Sent: Fri Jan 21 10:36:25 2011 Subject: Vivarium Pat. innate a a. :3 2325mm . Any update on the Vivarium? We have some ferrets in new. and need to get them over to .. .. .. Thanks.I Laura Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Thursday, January 20. 2011 11:39 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Belfiower, Craig Ws?pole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: AAI #6614 CDC .. HMAC modi?cations Qornrnissioningmtiggigg?U TAB Report {61:3142 c. assaarm . . . Attachments: MI #6614 CD0 HVAC Modi?catlons Commussnonlng AAI #6614 CDC HVAC Modi?cations C): and TAB.pcif FYI Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1666 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-488-8307 Cell: 404-825-6827 Fax: 770-488?2667 email: KMossl@cdc.gov --?-0riginal Message-nu From: Cosondra Crawford Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:43 PM To: Moss, Karen Tim North; macQae-designcom AAI #5814 CDC . .. HVAC Modi?cations Commissioning Cs and TAB Report Good Afternoon All, Please disregard the email sent this morning at 10:57am and use the attached reports with the latest revision to the commissioning report. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thanks, {b1i3'142 Cosondra EBEaihi ?-w0rigina From: Cosondra Crawford Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 10:5?r AM To: Karen Moss (KMoslecdcgov); Trim North; Subject: MI #6814 Modi?cations Commissioning C): and TAB Report Good Morning All, AAI's report's regarding the above referenced project is attached. This work was performed by Felix Graves. Ifyou have any questions, please feel free to give us a call. Sincerely, Cosondra Crawford Air Analysis'of Atlanta. Inc. ??0-929-3155 Of?ce HVAC Modi?cations Commissioning Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 11:22 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium Thanks. Just let us know. [0013242 5.0. {5 252301: From: Moss, Karen To: {coqocoorOSHE) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thu Jan 20 11:0?:23 2011 Subject: RE: Vivarium lam going to be there with the contractor at 1:00 p.111. today to inspect. FYI Karen Moe's P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1500 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: ??0-433-8307 Cell: 404-325-6827 Fax: email: Kh'fossl?odcaov From: (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Tuesday, January 10.r 2011 10:44 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium UK. Just let us know. Hope you feel better. :4 From: Moss, Karen (CDQIDCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesda January 18, 2011 10:23 AM To: (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: Vivarium hopefully I will be well enough to do tomorrow. ibif?l Cc: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tue Jan 18 09:23:07' 2011 Subject: Vivarium Karenl . We are trying to get the programs back into the vivarium. I know there was some worked scheduled for last week to seal some of the new duct work in the Vivarium, did that been completed? Is there anything else that we are waiting on? Thanks. Ina 3,42 US '3 2132mm Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss. Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFW Sent: I -- -- To: Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium I am going to be there with the contractor at 1:00 pm. today to inspect. FYI Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS .Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Celt: 4114-8256321 Fax: email: KMOSSI @cdc.gov From: CDC/ocoorosrl E) Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 10:44 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: Vivarium OK. Just let us know. Hope you feel better. l3. 4 From: Moss, Karen - i .- ary 18, 2011 10:23 AM Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: Vivarium Pet; Yes it has been done but needs to be reinspeoted: Karen Moss . hopefully i will be well enough to do tomorrow. From: cocrocoorosaa To: Moss, Karen Cc: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tue Jan 18 09:23:03? 2011 Subject: Vivarium a? Karen, We are trying to get the programs back into the viverium. know there was some worked scheduled for last week to seal some of the new duct work in the viveriurn. did that been completed? Is there anything else that we are waiting on? Thanks. U53 Mathe, Chester (cocrocoorosep) From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: I 20, 2011 7:55 AM To: (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) Subject: Re: Vivarium a going in today to inspect. was out yesterday. Karen Moss P.E. To: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Howard.r William (Bill) Sent: Thu Jan 20 07:45:16 2011 Subject: Re: Vivarium So where are we now? From: Moss Karen CDCIOCOOIBFO) To: (CDCJOCOOIUSHE) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tue Jan 18 10:27:52 2011 Subject: Re: Vivarium Pat' . {bli?l Yes It has been done but needs to be reinspected. Karen Moss P.E. . hopefully I will be well enough to do tomorrow. . 7(cocroc00/OSHE) To: Moss, Karen (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tue Jan 13 09:23:02 2011 Subject: Vivarium Karen. We are trying to get the programs back into the vivarium. I know there was some worked scheduled for last week to seal some of the new duct work in the vivarium, did that been completed? Is there anything else that we are waiting on? Thanks. 3:3. 2523.11: Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bel?ower, Craig Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:31 AM Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) 3351?le Paularea yesterday reviewing drawings to make asbuilts for the El an i-mal suits-l i noticed twoitem??m r'b'i3' "33- gestaan that feeds air into the Special Procedure Room has not been locked down for constant volume by The modulating control setpoint is based on the position indication of the wall switches for it cubicle rooms. This programming needs to decommissioned. However. the position of supply-valve needs to be locked down ?rst. The positivefnegative command switches for the cubicles are still mounted on the wall down in the space. These switches need to be physically removed for proper decommissioning of the controls for the cubicles. These are some items that] noticed by observation. Let me know. if you need any assistance with these issues. Thanks. 2623ch . - - 2. Craig Bel?ower lliiathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: (coorocoorOSHE) Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 10:44 AM To: Moss, Karen Cc: Probet, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium OK. Just let us know. Hope you feel better. From: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOGIBFO) Sent: Tuesda January 18, 2011 10:28 AM To: (coqocooyomE) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: Vivarium Pat: Yes it has been clone but needs to be reinspected. I hopefully I will be well enough to do tomorrow. Karen Moss P.E. From: (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) To: Moss, Karen (CDCKOCDOIBFO) Cc: Probst, PauI E. Sent: Tue Jan 18 09:23:07 2011 Subject: Vivarium Karen We are trying to get the programs back into the vivariun?r. I know there was some worked scheduled for last week to seal some of the new duct work in the vivarium, did that been completed? Is there anything else that we are waiting on? Thanks. 4: U5 ?2623lh$ Mathe, Chester From: (cocrocoorows) Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 10:43 AM To: Williams, Allison 1- (CDCIOIDJNCEZID) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Subject: RE: automatic door in Vivarium Tony is correct in thatthe door will remain open for 40 seconds after the last motion is detectedltriggered. If something is within the sensor range the door will always remain open. So if something is placed in front of the door and not removed it will remain open until 40 seconds afterthat item is removed. The last time i walked through, I was walking towards the door along the right side of the corridor to the mop storage area and it kept triggering the door to open. Overall. it possible I think it would be a good idea to shorten that activation range to stop nuisance openings. As far as the time it remains open, I do think that is too long but programs can have that set at what they are comfortable with. From: Williams, Allison Sent: Tuesda January 18, 2011 10:18 AM To: I'blt3i242 Cc: Probst, Paul E. (sociocooraFO); Subject: RE: automatic door in Vivarium I don't think i understand what you mean. People actually working in the space would not be walking close enough to trigger the sensor unless they are exiting. Further, I understand that the senor has already been adjusted to not be as long or broad as previously. One can enterl'exlt each of the rooms at the end of the corridor without triggering the door sensor to open. Allison From; Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 10:00 AM To: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDINCEZID Cc: Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoorsFO); (coo/ocoomsus) Subject: RE: automatic door in Vivarium Allison, The door would never close on a rack in the would be in the path of the sensor and the door stays open as long as something is engaging it. As it is now, persons walking by without intention of passing through the doorway will be opening the door for 40 seconds and affect airflow. This needs to be corrected from my perspective. 4.: ELC. E- From: Williams, Allison 18, 2011 9:54 AM CDCXOIDJNCEZID Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: automatic door in Vivarium c. sszam: (CDCKOCOOIOSHB the current settings are adequate and necessary for our operational needs. The 40 sec delay is to allow a single person rolling a rack the opportunity.' to pass safely through the door without the rack getting caught by the door. My understanding is that if a person is passing through and does not need the delay the doorway is equip with a button that when pushed will immediately close the door. Sin cerely. Allison From: "339?? 3523"? (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:36 AM To: Williams,r Allison Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOIUSHE) Subject: automatic door in Vivarium Allison, Before work in the Vivarium begins, I believe that the common anteroom door (one that opens automatically 8: leading to the autoclave area) needs some adjustments. It is staying open too long sec) and the sensor beam needs to be restricted [to bread). I propose that the timing be reduced to 15 sec max and the range ofthe sensor cut in half. Is this irge or needs? USC Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Tuesda Janua 18, 2011 10:28 AM To: His (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: Vivarium Yes it has been done but needs to be reinspeotedl ll hopefully I will be well enough to do tomorrow. Karen Moss P.E. From: E) To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tue Jan 18 09:23:07 2011 Subject: Vivarium Karen. We are trying to get the programs back into the viuerium. I know there was some worked scheduled for last week to seal some of the new duct work in the Vivarium, did that been completed? Is there anything else that we are waiting on? Thanks. 42 US I: 252301: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Williams, Allison Sent: .. .- To: CDCIOIDINCEZID Cc: Probst, Paul E. . (cocrocooroseel Subject: RE: automatic door in Vivarium - - I don't think I understand what you mean. People actually working in the space would not be walking close enough to trigger the sensor unless they are exiting. Further, I understand that the senor has already been adjusted to not be as long or broad as previously. One can enteriexit each of the rooms at the end of the corridor without triggering the door sensor to open. Allison From] 5252300: Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 10:00 AM To: Williams, Allison Cc: Probst, Paul E. ?am Subject: RE: automatic door in Vivarium Allison, The door would never close on a rack in the would be in the path of the sensor and the door stays open as long as something is engaging it. As it is now, persons walking by without intention of passing through the doorway will be opening the door for 40 seconds and affect air flow. This needs to be corrected from my perspective. From: Williams, Allison Sent: Tuesday, January 18,r 2011 9:54 AM . Cc: Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoorerm; (coo/ocoorosnsj Subject: RE: automatic door in Vivarium i the current settings are adequate and necessary for our operational needs. The 40 sec delay is to allow a single person rolling a rack the opportunity to pass safely through the door without the rack getting caught?by the door. My understanding is that if a person is passing through and does not need the delay the doorway is equip with a button that when pushed will immediately close the door. Sincerely, Allison lei-42 use ?202aihi From: Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:36 AM To: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDINCEZID Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: automatic door in Vivarium (cocxocoozoses) Allison, Before work in the Vivarium begins, i believe that the common anteroom door [one that opens automatically 8: leading to the autoclave area) needs some adjustments. It is staying open too long {~40 sec) and the sensor beam needs to be restricted [to broad]. propose that the timing be reduced to 15 sec max and the range of the sensor cut in half. Is this ?ne for needs? Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: $343342 LLS C: 252mm Sent: Tuesday, January ?lB. 2011 10:00 AM To: Williams, Allison Cc: Probst, Paul E. {cocrocooreeox . (coorocoorOSHE) Subject: RE: automatic door in Vivarium Allison. The door would never close on a rack in the doorwayujt would be in the path of the sensor and the door stays open as long as something is engaging it. As it is now, persons walking by without intention of passing through the doom-ray will be opening the door for 40 seconds and affect air flow. This needs to be corrected from my perspective. From: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDKNCEZID) Sent: Tuesda January 18, 2011 9:54 AM use. 252th] Cc: Probst, Paul E. mas! (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: RE: automatic door in Vivarium "bi'gi?iaurni the current settings are adequate and necessary for our operational needs. The 40 sec delay is to allow a single person rolling a rack the opportunity to pass safely through the door without the rack getting caught by the door. My understanding is that if a person is passing through and does not need the delay the doorway is equip with a button that when pushed will immediater close the door. Sincerely, Allison From 5 ?2I32alhl Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:36 AM To: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDINCEZID Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: automatic door in Vivarium . . Allison. Before work in the Vivarium begins, I believe that the common anteroom door (one that opens automatically at leading to the autoclave area) needs some adjustments. It is staying open too long sec] and the sensor beam needs to be restricted (to broad). I propose that the timing be reduced to 15 sec max and the range of the sensor cut in half. Is this ?ne for needs? llamas-12 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCODIOSEP) From: Williams, Allison Sent: 13, 2011 9:54 AM To: CDCIOIDINCEZID Cc: - Probst. Paul E. (coerced-cram); . (CDCIOCODIOSHE) Subject: RE: automatic door in Vivarium 7 the current settings are adequate and necessary for our operational needs. The :10 sec delay is to allow a single person rolling a rack the opportunity to pass safely through the door without the rack getting caught by the door. My understanding is that if a person is passing through and does not need the delay the doorway is equip with a button that when pushed will immediately close the door. Sincerely, Allison Ll ac. 252mm Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:36 AM To: Williams, Allison Cc: Probst, Paul E. I at? . Subject: automatic door in Vivarium .. {cocrocooxoSHEl Allison, Before work in the Vivarium begins, I believe that the common anteroom door (one that opens automatically at leading to the autoclave area) needs some adjustments. It is staying open too long (?40 sec) and the sensor beam needs to be restricted (to broad). I propose that the timing be reduced to 15 sec max and the range of the sensor cut in half. is this ?ne for ARB's needs? rlul. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: ?11"3?42 9593"" CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Tuesday, January 13. 2011 9:36 AM To: Williams. Allison Cc: Probst, Paul E. . - (cooiocoorosns) Subject: automatic door in Vivarium Allison, Before work in the Vivarium begins, I believe that the common anteroom door (one that opens automatically 8: leading to the autoclave area) needs some adjustments. It is staying open too long sec) and the sensor beam needs to be restricted (to broad}. I propose that the timing be reduced to 15 sec max and the range of the sensor cut in half. Is this ?ne for needs? Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: - {cocrocoorosea Sent: Tuesday, January 18. 2011 9:23 AM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFQ Ce: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Vivarium We are trying to get the programs hack into the Vivarium. i know there was some worked scheduled for last week to seal some of the new duct work in the Vivarium, did that been completed? Is there anything else that we are waiting on? Thanks. Ib?i? 12 U5 '2 EGEBIIH Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent To: Go: Ehe??iilifgilbfect: All, I'v'lossl Karen (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Friday, January 14, 2011 3:00 PM Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO (Bill) - (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Lingler, Arthur R. Daniels, Charles E. Blanchard, Thomas M. Nogueira, William P. Tyler, John ijlg3i-42 - HowardI Wiliiam Meechan, Paul J. COOIB F0) - Vivarium Per requested attached is the (I): Report from Air Analysis and drawings showing the actual ?nal airflows as set by Air Analysis and the measured pressure differential across the doors. Call if you have questions. Regards, m. rim P2EIIJEI453 ARI Karen Moss F. E. Mechanical Engineer We 5? - CDC AAI TAB nits-42 I I [3533?, CFM Floor . CFM and Pressu. . . Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?oe: WEI-4338307 Cell: 404?325-682? Fax: ?70+433-2667 email: KMossl@cdg,gpz From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCODKBFO) Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:32 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Lingler, A . Subject: FW: Vivarium Kare WAIT: R. Copying you on an e-mail sent by to the programs he appears to be of the opinion of FMEO and OSHE that the results show suocess. Karen regarding items 2 and 3 below, will Air Analysis be turning over something we can share? Please call if necessary. Thanks, Paul 404-839-0505 lanai-42 us 0 ?2I32alh: Sent: 2 nes av, ecemberZQ, 2010 2:26 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOZBFO) Moe: Howard, 'am (Bill) (cocrocooxosnm RE: ivarium Paul, I think there needs to be 1) a simple statementfmemo from OSHE to the programs on their take (Pat may have a checklist from the ?nal walk through), 2] a BFO document simply outlining the testing performed (Dec 28} and results (is the contractor providing something?), and 3] there needs to be some documentation of the "nevf? air flow in the area that can be presented to DSAT {Roman can provide a snapshot of numbers right before it is ready to be occupied}. If is involved, there might something else that the would want. Need to discuss this, but I think these de?nit need to be more than 1 page each. Keep it simple. From: Probst, Paul E. Ser W??nm?m' ?5 ?ember 29, 2010 1:39 PM To: USE. Cc: Howard, iam (Bill) Subject: RE: Vivarium What kind of ?report and associated documents? are we talking about? Thanks. Paul 404-639-0505 From: were 5252mm CDCKOIDINCEZID) Sent: Nednesday, Decem er 29, 2010 8:44 AM (coerciomcmo Iatcocrommcwo); Karem, Kevin (cocrom/NCEZID); cor: Pusey James E. ma Howard, William (Bill) Probst, Paul E. 252mm ject: IUivarium All, I The commissioningftesting of the . . Vivarium appears to have gone very well (Dec 28], and I believe programs should expect a report and associated documents indicating this sometime in January. The return to service date ofJan 10 is still in effect, as there are a few things that need to be fixed and installed, followed by a ?nal clean up by Goodwill. 2 There is now a need for program operation protocols to be modi?ed to reflect changes in entering, reentering, exiting, etc? This will be a major agenda item for the Jan 13 HOG meeting. when ready, please send the files to OSHE and for review. Many thanks to all those who contributed to the looks very good and is a major improvement to the- facility. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Frorn: (coprocoorosHE) Sent: Friday. January 14, 2011 2:16 PM To: Zambuto, Laura R. (CDCIOIDINCIRD) Cc: Probst. Paul E. amereusc.52mm.- (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Subject: Re: Vivarium I don't think so. If there are any issues wilI keep you in the loop. F'aul can you please update us on the duct work Karen needs to get done. Thanks El From: Zambuto Laura R. (CDCIOIDJNCIRD) To: . (morocco/earls) Sent: Fri Jan 14 14:12:15 2011 Subject: RE: Vivarium We can't schedule any animals until we know the Vivarium is ready to go. Do you need a rep for the Walk through on Tuesday? - . (CDCIOCOOIDSHE) Sent: Friday, January .14, 2011 2:11 PM To: Zambuto, Laura R. Subject: .Re: Vivarium I will do it on luesdey. I heard today the contractor needs to come in and seal some duct work next week. When do you have animals scheduled to come in? El From: Zambuto Laura R. To: Iver-twee Warr- (coproro/Ncezro) Sent: Fri Jan 14 13:11:03 2011 Subject: Vivarium I suspect that the Vivarium walk through did not happen on Monday. Is there a new one scheduled? Thanks. Lau re Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 2:08 PM To: Bel?ower, Craig Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Subject: FW:Vivarium Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCXOCOOJBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM To:Willi' . effery Suhjectj?tfivarium Egress Jeff: This is following Up on.an issue atthe Wrarium that we talked about in late December- have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 Ibf and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lbf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 7.2.1.4.5, EXCeption No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 501bf. Since the project modi?ed air flow to the system. we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in. compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. Ex Report 2. NFPA 101 2000 3. ASHRAE Formula - CDC NFPA 101 - ashree formula.de 18 SSE Cx zoos.de For ease of reference. this is what the (3): report states: ?The Commissioning (Ox) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply tan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also. on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by thecard reader, it was necessary to pushlpull'the door inwardloutward before turning the handle and opening the door." Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. Sent: Thursday. January 20, 2011 8:18 AM To: 'ams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Vivarium Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. 1 have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report. it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 Ibf and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 Ibf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 12.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 Ibf. Since the project modi?ed air flow to the system. we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing; Therefore. we actualty are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. Cx Report 2. NFPA 101 2000 3. ASHRAE Formula ?Window NFPAIUI- ashreeformula.pdf as?: Bids . 20013.de For ease of reference. this is what the Cx report states: ?The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushrpull the door inwardioutward before turning the handle and opening the door.? Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. Sent: Thursday, January 20. 2011 ?:39 AM To: Jue. Bruce R. Subject: RE: Draft Thanks. From: Jue, Bruce R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 20'r 2011 5:31 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Re: Draft Paul - The draft is good enough to send as is to Jeff. However based the CX data on ?le stating. than 3 times", i assume Jeff will want to know what the actual force required is now, before approving anything. I recommend OSHE or FMEO purchase a scale and measure the force. Bruce From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) To: .?lue, Bruce R. (CDCIOCUOIBFO) Sent: Wed Jan 19 18:33:14 2011 Subject: Draft Bruce: Here is a draft of what I plan to send to Jeff. Not sure this is how we discussed it. Please advise on wording. Also, I was incorrect in that we had the actual door readings. The commissioning agent provided door differential pressures. not force required to open the door. This is what the Cx report states: ?The Commissioning (Ox) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushfpull the door inwardfcutward before turning the handle and opening the door." Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. 1 have attached both the commissioning agent?s report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. [n the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 Ibf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 72.1.4.5, Exception No.1. indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 Ibf. Since the project modi?ed air flow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore. we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Maths, Chester From: Jue, Bruce R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 6:31 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Subject: Re: Draft Paul - The draft is good enough to send as is to Jeff. However based the CK data on ?le stating, than 3 times", i assume Jeff will want to know what the actual force required is now, before approving anything. i recommend OSHE or FMEO purchase a scale and measure the force. Bruce From: Probst,r Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) To: Jue, Bruce R. (CDCIDCDOIBFO) Sent: Wed Jan 19 18:33:14 2011 Subject: Draft Bruce: Here is a draft of whatl plan to send to Jeff. Not sure this is how we discussed it. Please advise on wording. Also. I was incorrect in that we had the actual door readings. The commissioning agent provided door differential pressures, not force required to open the door. This is what the Cx report states: ?The Commissioning (0x) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushfpull the door inwardfoutward before turning the handle and opening the door.? Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent?s report as well as the applicable paragraph'from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report. it is noted that maximum alIowable force is 15 [bf and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount {45 lbf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lbf. Since the project modified air flow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please repiy with your thoughts. Paul Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 6:33 PM To: Jue, Bruce R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Draft Bruce: Here is a draft of what I plan to send to Jeff. Not sure this is how we discussed it. Please advise on wording. Also, I was incorrect in that we had the actual door readings. The commissioning agent provided door differential pressures, not force required to open the door. This is what the Cx report states; ?The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook?. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Aiso, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushfpull the door inwardfoutward before turning the handle and opening the door." Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 Ibf}. The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 12.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lbf. Since the project modi?ed air ?ow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compiiance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Prebst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 8:56 AM To: Jue. Bruce R. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: Code Bruce: Do we have 199? Life Safety Code for situation at Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Mathe, Chester From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 4:22 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Subject: FW: Vivarium From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 4:02 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Daniels, Charles E. Doss, Maurice C. (Chris) Blanchard, Thomas M. Chandler, George (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Vivarium Team, 1 have discussed this issue with the team, and we have determined that it would be prudent and most practical to mitigate this issue as much as possible without signi?cantly delaying the program any further. Upon reviewing the design, specifications, cut-sheets, and actual installation, 1 would contend that the installation of the three assemblies (including mitigation listed below) essentially meets the intent of the applicable fire safety codes. I would also contend (barring any additional items) that facilities turnover to operationsiprogram can' be achieved NLT Monday, January 31, 2011. This determination does not offer an interpretation on the compiiancy of said installation to the letter of applicable codes and standards based on 'on'iciai contract documents. Mitigation: Since the issue is with the ?re rating (Ui. Fire Rated Assembiies) of the complete assembly and the ability to serve as a barrier against smokei?re propagation throughout the space, as the AHJ lfeel it would be prudent to provide a layer of intumescent ?re caulking (equivalent the rating of the assembly) between the damper sleeve, diffuser sleeve, and the ?backing? sleeve that was ?eld-installed against the coredigrouted slab. The following is a list of other actions required to settle this issue from a code compliancy and contract adherence viewpoint. - Identity and document any possible non-conformances in detail and provide to PGO for disposition. We should itemize each issue and speci?c location of possible non-conformances or deficiencies, and prepare draft scope and IGE required to remediate. It will be up to PGO to enforce such de?ciencies by withholding payment, extending contract period, etc., as long as we clearly identify the technical details and speci?c areas of non- conformance or non-compliance. - As AHJ, have determined that this particular de?ciency does not rise to the level of placing personnel or property at risk (given the location of the installations, mitigating factors. etc}, and will write an official temporary waiver with mandatory mitigations included. The mitigations will include returning to the installation in 12 months (or whenever an outage is offered) and performing correctionsiremediation, etc. to meet the full intent and requirements of the design and all applicable codes and standards. - I would like the project technical team and all necessary stakeholders to meet within the next 3 weeks to determine the extent to which a full remediation is required in 12 months. Things to consider: is there value- added in remediating the existing installation to the "as-designed" con?rguration? Does the UL listing or UL rating of this installationiapplication bring additional valua to the ?reilife safety intent? Does the existing installation (along with any mitigating actions} bring this installation to a ?code-equivalent" condition of performance? Please let me know if you have any additional comments or questions. vir Jeff Williams Deputy Director Authority Having Jurisdiction Buildings 8 Facilities Of?ce 770.488.8089 From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:54 AM To: Williams, Jeffery Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCDOXBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium FYI From: [gui?g?g?gilw Sent: Thursday, January 2011 10:2? AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCKOIDINCIRD) Subject: Vivarium I Zambuto, Laura R. It has come to my attention that Karen Moss is requesting more delays for the programs regarding the operations of the yiyan'um i Apparently there are some ?re damper issues that will require entry into yiyarium animal space. My question is why is this being brought up know and again delaying the programs. Apparently it was known earlier and an attempt was made to get the contractor in to make the repairs before they went hot. It looks like they are now trying to get back in again tomorrow to complete or ?nish the has been planning all week to go hot tomorrow (28JAN201 1} with appropriate notices sent out I would like to ?nd out if all attempts have been made to have this work done today or after hours tonight so as to not delay the programs. We had delays last week and down time all of this week to make repairs. Thanks [El Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Browning, Daniel A. (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Sent: Tuesday. August 2012 1:2? PM To: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIDSEP) Subject: FW1Aocess ControI Issues From: Browning, Daniel A. (CDCIOCOOKOSEP) Sent: Tuesday, Juli.r 31, 2012 4:11 PM To: Rogers, Barbara A. Co: Browning, Daniel A. Henderson, Joseph Subject: FW: Access Control Issues Barbara, The attached e-mails should not be a problem. Dan From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:08 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Browning, Daniel A. (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Subject: Access Control Issues Here are my emails pertaining to the above mention subject. :ri; FW: AW: APR Door Numb - APR RE: AW: APR Door Emergency Exi. .. door in Emergency George K. Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce Centersfor Disease Control and Preaen tion 1600 Cii?on Reed, N.W., MS: Atlanta, GA 30333 Of?ce: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1635 Cell: 404.59?.2599 5.5 Pieere remider rise eneimnssenr bwrepn?ntz?qg 2&5er e-mei! Mathe, Chester From: Bowen. Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday. September 06, 2006 7:12 AM To: Raymond. George Williams, Jeffery (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: AW: APR Door Emergency Exit Buttons If it does require some programming changes I guess we will get Johnson in to do it? Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404-639?3303 Of?ce 404-639-0499 Fax From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2006 7:00 AM To: Nogueira, William P. Bowen, Ken L. Knob, Stephen H. Raymond, George Phillips, Roman (CTR) Cc: Kine, Jennifer T. Subject: FW: AW: APR Door Emergency Exit Buttons All: Here is the response from the APR door manufacturer concerning controls mods. it appears that they do not do anything on the controls end. Paul Probst From: Ch. v. Stenglin mailto' .sten lin metall- lastic.de Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:11 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCUOIBFO) Subject: AW: AW: APR Door Emergency Exit Buttons Paul. i regret no. We have providedjust the hardware. For I know Johnson Controls had been responsible for the software Best regards Chris Von: Probst, Paul E. Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. September 2006 20:23 An: Betreff: Re: AW: APR Door Emergency Exit Buttons Chris: Thanks for your reply. Does your service include the "pro gram adj ustment" noted below? Paul E. Probst CONSTRUCTION WAGER Of?ce: 404-639-0505 Fax: 404-63 9-0283 Email: We -?--Original From: Ch. v. Stenglin ; Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCODFBFO) av}; Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Fri Sep ill 04:58:31 2006 Subject: AW: APR Door Emergency Exit Buttons Dear Paul, Sorry for the late response but I?m currently travelling and due to vacation season we have capacity problems in our design department. I ?nally got the answer that we have no space left to locate 2 LED's. Therefore we need to stay with the tri colour LED but this will need program adjustment. 1 will try to call you today. Best regards Chris Von: Nogueira, William P. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. August 2006 15:11 An: Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIO White, Stephen H. Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Betre?': APR Door Emergency Exit Buttons Good Day, Chris, Per our conversation Friday last week, you mentioned you would send us the design for the emergency exit buttons. Were you able to accomplish the design? My understanding was you could add an addition amber light if room was available on the plate. This would eliminate any ma] or reprogramming to our Building Automation System. If you have this information available and any additional cost that may occur because of the addition light. Could you send it to Paul Probst or Me. We are ready to order the retro?ts and make arrangements to have someone from your organization come to CDC and complete initial installation per our earlier conversations. Thanks in advance for you assistance, Paul Nogueira ?3 Building Manager Email - pbn?r?t?cdcgov Phone - (404) 63 9-1679 Cell - (678) 616-4695 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 8:01 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sub ect: Fw: Vivarium Cx Report Question ear climate; . -- IReport.pdf From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 06:46 AM To: Moss, Karen Subject: Vivarium Cx Report Question $21.13 - .C-DC -Report.pdf>> Karen: Attached is the report from Air Analysis regarding the controls system veri?cation conducted late December. I have a question. Please advise if I should go directly to For items 1 through 6, the check off box is labeled ?All labs maintain required directional airflow", where a ?yes? answer is a good thing. Then. on items 8 through 11. the wording changes to ?All tab directional air ?ow is not maintained", where a ?yes? answer is a bad thing. The reason I am asking is because if we take the literal meaning. We have a couple of situations where a reversal of air ?ow occurs. and I do not recall that happening. Further. under item #10, they explain a ?no? answer with a footnote. is it possible that the intent ofthe question for all items remained the same, but somehow the wording went astray starting with Number El. Paul Probst, PE Asst. Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Buildings and Facilities Of?ce Of?ce: 404-639-0505 air analysis of atlanta, inc. 1520 pine log rd oonyers. ga 30011 (770] 929-3165 (NO) 4833365 fax hyac consulting test and balance commissioning December 28. 2010 Karen Moss. PE CDC Building 18 Lab Renovation Ox Functional Test Documentation Atlanta, GA Re: CDC Imp"12 U5 ?2523"? IFunctic-nal Tests Documentation: 1. Fail by throwing disconnect on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position damper closes and exhaust plenum static control damper modulates to In static pressure set point w. o. for the exhaust system X_yes _no. ?maintains pre-failure operating conditions 5 yes _no. All labs maintain required directional airflow 5 yes _no. mi 2. Restore into operation and allow system to stabilize. 3. Fail by throwing disconnect on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position damper closes and exhaust plenum static control damper modulates to 'n static pressure set point we. for the exhaust system yes mno. L?s. maintains ore-failure operating conditions 5 yes _no. All labs maintain required directional air?ow 3 yes _no. continue to operate normally 5 yes All labs maintain required direc ion airflow yes. _no. ib?abt2 5. Restore use a 6. Fall one - . continues to operate and the VFD speeds up and maintains supply duct WW I I 5 pressure set point 1.5"w.c. for the supply air system? yes no. Both 2623a: 3' continue to operate normally a yes _no. All labs maintain required directional air?ow yes no. Restore the system to normal operation. by throwing disconnects on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position I I - -. es and exhaust plenum static control damper ?"3495? shuts down both supply air fans and related isolation dampers. 3 yes _no. All labs required directional airflow is not maintained. 5 yes _no. 9. Restore the system to normal operation. . - 3 :42 . (btt3l242 10. Fall fans ?at-42 ?5'0 5 2525? Expected resending; a Icontinues to operate shuts down. . I . tenum dampers open 100%. 23 as no. Lab suite maintains it negative pressure to surrounding areas, 5 yes _no. All lab directional air ?ow is not maintained yes no. Required strength to open exit doors from the lab suite is acceptable per NFPA 101 code for egress of occupants yes. 12. 31 no. 11. Kill power to all four fans simultaneoust was suggested. Exgected results: Lab suite directional air?ow is not maintained 5 yes _no. Air flow patterns in the suite are directional to the cage wash area a yes _no. Notgs: (1) Total containment is maintained and alt directional airflow is into the tabs. (2) Upon dual supply fan shut down. egress from the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by CDCIBFOIDEMO. The Commissioning (0x) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also. on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader. it was necessary to pushrpull the door inwardtoutward before turning the handle and opening the door. Pressure Differentials across Suite Egress Doors U.S.C. 262ath} FirelSmoke Mode was not commissioned. During FiretSmoke Mode. dual suppiy fan shut down is commanded and steinvell pressurization fans start up and run. Exhaust fans run as described in 9 of the Car Report. The combination of excessive negative pressure on the tab floor and the pressurization of stainivells in FirelSmoke Mode would cause the door opening forces mentioned in item #2 to increase signi?cantly. (4) Air Analysis of Atlanta was informed by that the assumes responsibility for accepting the Vivarium to be reopened with known code violation. and CDCIBFOIFMEO will initiate a separate project to address this issue?. an WEB 1 drevE Maths. Chester (CDCIOCODIOSEP) US Ci :Ucalh: . . . Sent: 2011 7:55 PM To: isomomrncezm): . . Williams. Allison Howard. William (Bill) Probst. Paul E. 'Waloie Kenneth K. Zambuto, Laura R. I11 Singletary Meadows. Kristi Subject: Fw: Vivarium Something tells me the e?mail below is going to lead to a deeper ps we should have invited them back for an inspection before going hot again. Ducal-rt: lb'll'3'j'42 LISA: E- 2623Ih': .bl?gl .12 252mb} Sent: Thursda . Ma 12,. 2011 05:20 PM s6; Subject: l? iyarium You informed me back in the fall that HVAC work was scheduled for the Bid - "yarium. Has this work been completed? LI SC. 5 262mm DSAT mission: We regulate the possession. use. and transfer of select agents and toxins and the importation of etiological agents. hosts. and vectors of human disease to protect the public health in the United States. This document is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient named above. it may contain sensitive information that is protected. privileged. or con?dential. and should not be disseminated. distributed. or copied to persons not authorized to receive suoh information. If you are not the intended recipient. any dissemination. distribution. or copying is strictly prohibited. if you think you have received this document in error. please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original. Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Mathe, Chester (CDCIDCOOIDSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, Jannary 20, 2011 2:08 PM To: Belflower Craig Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Subject: FWivarium Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM To: Williams Jefferyr Subject: ivarium Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. in the report. it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lbf)- The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 72.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lbf. Since the project modified air flow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. (ix Report 2. NFPA 101 - 2000 3. ASHRAE Formula ,4 as - NFPA 101- ashras formulapdf Etta}; Help 2000.de For ease of reference, this is what the Cx report states; ?The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agencyr (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushipull the door inwardicutward before turning the handle and opening the door." a air analysis of atlanta, inc. 1520 pine log rd conyers, ga (7m) 929-3165 (no) 483-?355 fax hvac consulting test and balance commissioning December 28. 2010 Karen Moss. PE CDC Building 18 Lab Renovation Cx Functional Test Documentation Atlanta, GA (bps: 42 us sass-1m: Re: CDC IFunctional Tests Documentation: 1. Faill disconnect on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two pos'tion damper closes and exhaust plenum static control damper modulates to maintain static pressure set point w.c. for the exhaust system Ayes _no. . aintains pre-tailure operating conditions )3 yes _no. All tabs maintain required directional airflow 5 yes _no. 2. Reslor use nto operation and allow system to stabilize. 3. Fail by throwing disconnect on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position damper closes and exhaust plenum static control damper modulates to static pressure set point w.c. for the exhaust system 5 yes _no. aintains pre-failure operating conditions yes _no. All tabs maintain I'b3tsi'42 LL30. V. 252arh~ supply fan continues to opera an VFD speeds up and maintains supply duct static pressure set point Limo. for the supply air system 1 yes _no. Elot *3 U-S-C- i 95 continue to operate normally )5 yes _no. All labs maintain required directional airflow 3 yes, _no. 0 normal operation and allow system to stabilize. 6. Fail one fan 8 on Exgected results: The remainin [$225,119. upply fan continues to operate and the UFO speeds up and maintains sopply duct static pressure set point Ewe. for the supply air system; yes _no. Both continue to operate normally yes _no. All labs maintain required directions air?ow 5 yes no. 7. Restore the system to normal operation. [bus-c4: use. El. Fai 3 by throwing disconnects on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position c?ses and exhaust plenum static control damper closes. 3 yes In shuts down both supply air fans and related isolation dampersj yes All labs required directional airflow is not maintained. Eyes _no. 9. Restore the system to normal operation. to Fail fans. Exg cted resultsz- continues to operate ashuts down. Both exhaust fan plenum dampers open 100%. 5 yes_ no. Lab suite maintains negative pressure to surrounding areas. 5 yes _no. All lab directional air ?ow is not maintained _yes no. Required strength to open exit doors from the lab suite is acceptable per NFPA 101 code for egress of occupant's yes. it 3] no. 11. Kill power to all four fans simultaneoust was suggested. Exgected results: Lab suite directional air?ow is not maintained 5 yes _no. Air ?ow patterns in the suite are directional to the cage wash area 5 yes _no. Notes: (1) Total containment is maintained and all directional air?ow is into the tabs. Upon dual supply fan shutdown. egress from the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by CDCIBFOIDEMO. The Commissioning (Cir) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader: it was necessary to pushi'pull the door inwardtoutward befOre turning the handle and opening the do" (motto usc. 252arhi (3) FireiSmoke Mode was not commissioned. During FirerSmoke Mode. dual supply fan shut down is commanded and stairwell pressurization fans start up and run. Exhaust fans run as described in ti 9 of the Car Report. The combination of excessive negative pressure on the lab floor and the pressurization of stairwells in FirefSrnoke Mode would cause the door opening forces mentioned in item #2 to increase significantly (4) Air Analysis of Atlanta was informed by that the assumes responsibility for accepting the Vivarium to be re-opened with known code violation. and will initiate a separate project to address this issue" ani??atitravz MEANS OF EGRESS pair of doors is not less than one of the doors shall provide not less than a 32411. (Bl-cm) clear width opening. Exception No. 1: Exit access doors swing a room not exceeding [5.5 or?) and not required to be accessible to persons with severe mobil- it} impoimrents shall he not less than 24 in. ['61 on) in door loaf width. Exception No. 2: Doors serving o. huilding or portion thereof not re- irni to be accessible to {Jo-sons with swore mobility impairments shall be permitted door leofwiaith. Exception No. in existing buildings, the existing door loaf width shrill harlot less than 23 in. 1' 7i Exception No. 4: This requirement shall not apply as otherwise pro- p. oidscl in Chaplets 22 end 2.3. Exception No. 5: This requirement shall not apply to interior doors or provided in Gho?ter 24. Escapism No. ti: :1 grower-operated door leofloeoted within it two-loaf opening shall he sxem?tfrorn the minimum 32-in. (31mm) single-leaf arooironent in accordance with Extraction No. 2 to 12.19. No. This requith shall not apply to revolving doors or promoted in 7.2.1.10. 7.2.1.3 Floor Level. The. elevation of the floor surfaces on \l?mth sides oi'a door shall not vary hv more than V2 in. (1.3 cm). The elevation shall be maintained on both sidesB-i the doorway for a distance not less than the width of the widest leaf. Tlmesholds at doomajls shall not exceed If: in. (1.3 em) in height. Raised thresholds and ?oor level changes in excess of 1X in. {0.54 cm] at doomvs shall be bevelled with a slop-t; not steeuer than 1 in 2. Exception No. i: In onc- ond twofomily dwellings and in ex isting buihiings where the door discharges to the outside or to on exterior lush conr or exterior exit access, the ?oor level outside the door shell lit: per- mittcd to he one stop lower then the insideJ but shall not be in excess of 3 in. {20.3 cm) low-er: i Mtion No. 2: in one and twofomily dwellings and existing build- . I?gtlt. door at the top of stoirsholl be permitted to open directly at milled that the door docs not .noing over the stair and the door sewn on one with on occupant tonal offswer than 5 0 persons. ?3.2.1.4 and Force to Open- K?l. Al?? door in a means of egress shall be of the side- s? Or Plluledmnsing type. The door shall be designed iI :3 that it is capable from arr].F position it "hit-ill ?hull-?ad width of the opening in which it is li- "half-"v- . mg." I: ?.S?diflg dam HS Forti?ed in Chapters 22 and 23, hill-Wain In Chapter: 24, 32, and 33. -7 3iihti? Wm Permitted in Chapters 12 through 42, hori- 2.5% Witt-I; tolling security grilles or doors that ore port . 1-. 3m! I ?1 pg egress he permitted, provided that they .1233shall remain secured in the full open 3 so. occupancy by the generatootrlic. if! gs? or door there shall he a reocli visIt?! loss than i in. (2.5 cm) high on o. oon~ . foods as follows: I . gnu: . Eight?TU Rooster open {'h?ttoihi?i?m?ro rs oeetooeo . r' ?elm-?i? .rre- it la ilc?t he brought to the closed position when . - - .11 - *ri'a- - I. -. or . sit10145 Doors or grilles shall he opemhh?om within the space without our use ofonj special knowledge or o?forr. Wm two or more moons of egress are required, not more: than hny?hf the means of egress shall he continued with horizontal sliding or ontia?tl mllinggr?illes or doors. No. 3: Horizontal sliding doors complying with 12.1.H shell hopwwitwd. Exception No. 4: Doors to private guroges, business areas, industrial areas, and storage areas with on occupant load not according ill, when such prioote garages, business areas. in durtriol areas, and stor- age areas contain low or ordinary hozoni contents, shell be element ?orn this requirement. Exception No. 5: Revolving doors complying with 22.1.10 shall he familial. Exception No. ti: Existing fusible link-operated horizontal sliding or ocrtiool rotting-?re doors shall he pmnittorl to its used as in (Simpler: 12 through 42. $314.2 Doors required to be of the side-hinged or pivoted- swinging type shall swing in the direction of egzess travel where serving a roor?Fdiu an occupant load of 511] or more. Exception No. l: Doors in horizantol exits shall not he required to swing in the direction of egress travel where orientated in 7. 2.4.3. 6. Exocjttion No. 2: Smoke barrier doors shall not he: required to swing in the ofegress travel or trrooidod in Chapter 19. 7.2.1.43 A door shall swing in the direction of egress travel where used in an exit enclosure or where serving a high haz- ard contents area. unless it is a door from an individual living unit that opens directly,' into an exit enclosure. $311.44" During its swing. any door in a means of egress I shall leave not less than one-half of the required width of an aisle, corridor. passageway. or landing unobstructed and. shall not project more an in. [1?15 cm) into the required width of an aisle, corridor, p?'sig'eway. or landing, when fully open. Doors shall not 0 en direct onto a stair without audios . The anding shall have a width not less door. (Sm 12.1.3.) Exoefrlion: In existing huihlings, a door providing access to stair shall not he required to omintoin on} minimum unobstructed width I duringits swing fnouidsd that it meets the requirement that Iirnits pm- jirctr'on to not more than 5? in. (.1 1-8 cm} into the required width oft: stair or lending when the dooris?ttj often. The forces required to fully open any door manuallyl in" a means of egress shall not exceed 15' lbi N) to release the latch, 3i] 1 (133 N) to set the door inmotion. and 15 [57 NJ to open the door-to, the minimum required width. Opening. forces for interior side-hinged or pivoted-swinging doors without closers shall not-exceed 5 (22 N). These forces shall he applied at the latch stile. No. l: The opening flirts-for existing tiggtsi in existing. not exceed-.5 afp?edto latch stilt. Exception No. 2: The openingfo restfor horizontdl sliding?doors shoi he or jouoidetl in Cho?ters 22 and 23. Exception No. 3: The grower-operated doors shall he Mpmoitlotl in 12.19. Screen doors and storm. doors used in a means of egress shall be subject to the requirements for direction of swing that are applicable to other doors used in a means of egress. 2000 Edition 52.6 Examples 2 and 3 demonstrate that the air needed to prevent smoke back?ow can support an extremely large ?re. Most cem- rnercial and residential buildings contain enough fuel (paper, card- board, furniture, etc.) to support very large ?res. Even when the amount of fuel is normally very small, short-Leon fuel loads (dur- ing building renovation, material delivery, etc.) can be signi?cant. Therefore, using airflow for smoke control is not recommended, except when the fire is suppressed er in the rare cases when fuel can be restricted with con?dence. Example 2. 1iti?rrat airflow at a doorway is needed to step smoke hachilow from a room fully involved in tire, and how large a fire can this airflow support? A room full! involved in ?re can have an energy release rate on the order efS 10 Hindi. Ass-tune the deoris 3 ft wide and 7? ii high. From Equation r, seats a rotor? 790 fpnt. a ?ow duough the doorway of 790 3 7 [6,600 c?n is needed to prevent smoke from bock?owing into the area. if all the oxygen in this air?ow is consumed in the ?re, the heat lib- erath is I6,tit'ltl 5850 Bhu'h- cfin= 107 Blufh. This is over ill times more than the heat generated by the fully involved room ?re and indicates why airflow is generally not recommended for smoke control in buildings. Example 3. What air?ow is needed to stop smoke hackflow from a waste- basket fire, and how large a ?re can this air?ow support? A wastcbaskct ?re can have an energy release rate on the order of 5 a 105 Bush. As in Example 2. v, seats a toils)? no fprn. a ?ow through the doorway of3 lil 3 7 650i} is needed to prevent smoke back?ow. If all the oxygen in this air?ow is consumed in the ?re, the heat lib- crated is soon c?n a sore Btul'lt-cfrn as a in1 Hindi. This is still many times greater than the fully involved room ?re and further indi4 cates why airflow is generally not recommended for smoke contml in buildings. Buoyancy The buoyancy of hot combustion gases is used in both fun- poweted and non-fan-powercd venting systems. Fan-powered venting for large spaces is commonly used for atriums and cov- ered shopping malls, and nou-fan-powered venting is commonly used for large industrial and storage buildings. There is a concern that sprinkler ?ow will cool the smoke, reducing buoyancy and thus the system effectiveness. Research is needed in this area. Refer to Klotc and Milka (2002) and NF PA Standards 923 and 204 for detailed design information about these systems. SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN Door-Opening Forces The door-opening forces resulting from the pressure differences produced by a smoke control system must he considered. Unreason- ably high door-opening forces can make it dif?cult or impossible for occupants to open doors to refuge areas or escape routes. The force re quired to open a door is the sum of the forces to overr come the pressure difference across the door and to overcome the door closer. This can be expressed as 5.20 WA op (in where total door-opening forcc,1bf ch force to overcome deer closer. [by do or width, ii A deer area, It2 up pressure difference across door, irt. of water at distance from doorloreb to edge of knob side of door, it This relation assumes that the door-opening force is applied or the knob. Doorsopcning force caused by pleasure difference can 0ease as DIF FER race. In. at water I Fig. 7 Don r-Dpenlng Force Caused by Pressure Difference be determined from Figure 7 for a value of o' 3 in. The force to overcome the door closer is usually greater than 3 1b; and, in some cases, can be as great as 20 lbr. Fora door that is 7' it high and 3 ft wide and subject to a pressure diEerencc of {1.30 in. of water, the total door-opening force is 30 113,-, if the force to overcome the door cicseris 12 lhf. Flow Areas In designing smoke control systems, air?ow paths must be idcn-. ti?cd and evaluated. Some leakage paths are obvious, such as cracks around closed doors, open doors, elevator doors, windows, and air transfer grilles. Construction cracks in building walls are less obvi: one, but they are equally important. The ?ow area ofmost large openings, such as open windows, can. be calculated easily. However, ?ow areas of cracks are more dit?euit to evaluate. The area of these leaks ge paths depends on such fe series as worlonanship, door and weathers tripping. A 3 by 'i it door with an average crack width of 1th in. has a leakage area of [till it}. How'- evar, if this door is installed with a Eli-4 in. undercut, the leakage area is 0.36 fill, a signi?cant difference. The leakage area of elevator doors is in the range of 0.55 to hit] it2 per door. For open stairwell doorways, Cresci (1913) found complex ?ow patterns; the resulting ?ow through open doorways was considerably below that calculated using the doorway's geometric area as the flow area in Equation (3). Based on this research, it is recommended that the design flow area ofan open stairwell doorway behalf the geomet- ric area (door height I width) of the doorway. An alternative for open stairwell doorways is to use the geometric area as the ?ow area and use a reduced flow eoe?icient. Because it dries not allow the direct use of' Equation (8), this approach is not used here. Typical leukagearcas-i?er walls and ?oors?nl' comtercial build;- ings'tirc- tabulated as area ratios in Table I. These dataarc based on a relatively small number of tests performed by the National Research calms] of Guido-{Shaw et at. .1993; Tamara and Show lSl'r'?a, l9lob, 1973; Tamura and Wilson 1966]. Actual leakage areas depend primarily on workmanship rather than on construction mate- rials, and in some cases, the ?ow areas in particular buildings may vary from the values listed. Data concerning air leakage through- building components are also provided in Chapter 2? of the 2005 ASHRAE Handler: Because a vent surface is usually covered by a louver and screen, a vent?s ?ow area is less titan its area (vent height width). Calculation Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent To: Go: null} 42 .. - Paul, Moss, Karen (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Thursday. January 20. 2011 12:13 PM Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOE Lingler. Arthur FL (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Belflower, Craig Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Below are my comments on the status asl know it to be. Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. M8 K-97 Atlanta. Georgia 30333 Office: mess-sac? car; eases-ass? Fax: cease?zest email: From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 7:27 PM To: Moss, Karen Lingler, Arthur R. Cc: Belflower, Craig Walpole, Kenneth K. I - Message: RE: Commissioning Pre-Test All: i am trying to consolidate some outstanding items that have noted andfor have been presented to me. Most are to ensure that we leave the project with accurate documentation and ?eld settings before we move on and this one is forgotten. There may be other items you are aware of. Please advise status of completion. 1. 2. 3. Review of JCI as?builts Darius with JCI and Craig are coordinating Item 1 below TAB to lock down 06 in fieldr (Moss, Karen Done via TAB. JCI to decommissioning programming. Item 2 below Provide stainless cover plate over control panelfMoss, Karen (CDCIOCOOKBFOH JCI not sure [will look at this afternoon. Update of the system graphicsfdatabase to reflect new ?ow settings - TAB to provide new air flow at each valve, JCI to Updatel'Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOKBFOH TAB Report sent to Willis mechanical Commissioning of the new reheat coils by TAB (is this done?) FMEO to witness operation veri?cationfMoss, Karen This was done TAB is ?nished. Updating of the existing BAS system documentation software to reflect changes made to Darius and Craig coordinatefMoss, Karen JCI Calibration of the output transducer at exhaust fan plenum modulating damper? JCll'Moss, Karen Done before final Cx - more: see 252mm B. Re-tuning the PID loop JleMoss. Karen (CDCIOCOOKBFOH Done before final Ci: 9. Automatic door remote programmer who has possession?[Moss, Karen Willis Mechanical is checking on this 10. Architectural as-builts assume this is part of Willis scopefMoss, Karen drawing are the sis?bums, John Tyl'er to provide. 11. Mechanical as-built drawings assume this is part of Willis scopefMoss, Karen We have McKenney's as-builts. expected to get pipe as-builts today when I meet with the contractor. Thanks. Paul From: Belflower, Craig (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:31 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Walpole Kenneth K. CDC OCOO BFO Paul, . . . . USE. was on the SB HC area yesterday revuewing drawings to make asburlts for importance. 1. The modulating supply air valve that feeds air into thel locked down for constant volume by The modulating control setpoint is based on the position indication of the wall switches for the cubicle rooms. This programming needs to decommissioned. However, the position of supply valve needs to be locked down ?rst. 2. The positivelnegative command switches for the cubicles are still mounted on the well down in the space. These switches need to be physically removed for proper decommissioning of the controls for the cubicles. These are some items that i noticed by observation. Let me know. if you need any assistance with these issues. Thanks. Craig Belflower Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Moss. Karen Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 11:39 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bel?ower. Craio Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) $352.3? mack - -- IHVAC Modi?cations Commissioning CK and . TAB Report W?hmem? Mi #5314 Modi?cations Commissioning Renowpdf: AM #6813" Modi?cations Cx and TAB.pdf FYI Karen Moss P.E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road N.E. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Office: Cell: 404-825-682? Fax: Tito-4832667 email: KMoslecdcgov -?w0rigina From: Cosondra Crawford Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:43 PM To: Moss, Karen Tim North; g?h?s?timf?t AM #68141 - I Modifications Commissioning Ca and TAB Report Good Afternoon AII, Please disregard the email sent this morning at 10:57am and use the attached reports with the latest revision to the commissioning report. if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thanks, Cosondra From: Cosondra Crawford Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 10:57 AM To: Karen Moss (KMoslecdcgov); Tim North; Ensign? -- I Modi?cations Commissioning CK and TAB Report Good Morning All, AAl's report's regarding the above referenced project is attached. This work was performed by Felix Graves. If you have any questions, please feel free to give us a call. Since rely, Cosondra Crawford Air Analysis of Atlanta, Inc. 770-929-3155 Office USE. iModifications COmmissioning Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 7:27 PM To: Moss, Karen Lingler. Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Belflower. Craig Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOGIBFO) subject: Fw; II'Iin3i142 use. s252arn: RE: Commissioning Pro-Test All; I am trying to consolidate some outstanding items thatl have noted andror have been presented to me. Most are to ensure that we leave the project with accurate documentation and ?eld settings before we move on and this one is forgotten. There may be other items you are aware of. Please advise status of completion. 1. Review of as-builts Darius with JCI a nd Craig are coordinating . 2. Item 1 below?TAB to lock down in ?eld. JCI tc decommissioning programming. 3. Item 2 below Provide stainless cover plate over control panel 4. Update of the system graphicsfdatabase to re?ect new T36 flow settings TAB to provide new air flow at each valve. to update Commissioning of the new reheat coils by TAB (is this done?) FMEO to witness operatiorEe'E'fp?atcn Updating of the existing BAS system documentation 8t software to reflect changes made to Darius and Craig coordinate Calibration of the output transducer at exhaust fan plenum moduiating damper its ?3 8 Re-tuning the PID loop JCI 9. Automatic door remote programmer?who has possession? 10. Architectural as?builts assume this is part of Willis scope 11. Mechanical as-built drawings assume this is part of Willis scope Than ksI Paul From: Bel?ower, Craig (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:31 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Walpole. Kenneth K. . I Paularea yesterday reviewing drawings to make asbuilts for the . . i noticed two items of importance. 1. The modulating supply air valve that feeds air into thel Ihas not been locked down for constant volume by The modulating control setpcint is based on the position indication of the wall swit cubicle rooms. This programming needs to decommissioned. However, the position of supply valve . - needs to be locked down first. 2. The positivelnegative command switches for the cubicles are still mounted on the wall down in the space. These switches need to be physically removed for proper decommissioning of the controls for the cubicles. These are some items that i noticed by observation. Let me know. if you need any assistance with these issues. Thanks. have 42 us @2523th 1 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Sent: Friday, February 24,. 2012 10:58 AM To: Probet, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Cc: Powell, Steven L. Ford, Maria Cristina Parker, Darwin (CDCIOCOOJBFW (CTR) Subject: FW: Vivarium door adjustments FYI Ivan Branch Four Seasons Environmental Building #18'Supervisor Phone: 404-639-3472 Fax: 404?63943536 Message?m- From: Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 10:4? AM To: (cocxocoo/oSHE); Branch, Ivan me so. 5, 25am- Williams, Allison Powell, Nathaniel Subject: Vivarium door adjustments All, Doors have been adjusted to ensure that the air?ow remains negative. Each doors in the central corridor has been adjusted by Ivan Branch with the assistance of Peter Eronoskv. Respectfullv, Jeff Sheppard Jeffery Sheppard Biosafetv Manager, Office of Safety Health and Environment, Centers for Disease Control, 1600 Clifton Rd. NE., Atlanta, Ga. 30333 404-713-2037 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E. (CDGIOCOOIBFW Sent: ,Frida Februa 24, 2012 8:48 AM To: I (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: RE: Select Agent question Pat: Appreciate the update. Will let you know what we find out. Based on what we saw the other day, I am in agreement with you that we have no issues more serious than the "door closing hard creating miiIi-seoond poof? problem. Thanks, Paul Probst From: (cocrocooxoSHE) Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 8:33 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Fw: Select Agent question From: (cocrocooxosna Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 08:20 AM To: Scarborough moron, Kismet L. (escrow/nestle) Cc: Williams, Powell, Nathaniel Howard, William (Bill) WeL's-Owen Martin, Diane "new 0- 2623""? Subject: Re: Select Agent question With regards to the doors we are seeing a "poof" when the animal room doors close hard. This "poof" is an instantaneous happening. I do not View this as a "reversal" but it does need to be resolved and should not be occurring. was told this was taken care of yesterday but apparently not. FSE will again been down this morning for more adjustments. If the doors adjustments don't fix it we have alternatives. Now, ifthere are other issues, lfwe need to be made aware of them. To date all i have been told about is what we are referring to as the door issue. If there are other issues, Tony, Paul and Jeff will be down this morning. From: [0,032.42 USE. 202301, Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 08:00 AM To? .on'3t42 usesza2arn I. Uni-"ow Cc: Williams, Allison- Powell, Nathaniel Howard, Willia ?523m? cocrommcezro); Martin, Diane (CDCKOSELSK use. 6 262m: Subject: RE: Select Agent question I?rn including and Bill Howard from DSHE on this response so they can address your question . . . . [bail-:42 USE ?2?2a . . regarding airflow reqwrements In the in}, Vivarium. You are correct in that we do expect notification of events such as airflow reversals that represent a departure from requirements to ensure for compliance with the select agent regulations, particularly if the situation requires reporting of the event to DSAT. Please do continue to bring such events to our attention. We rely on OSHE and Program personnel to assist in risk assessments to determine whether or not operating irregularities in select agent registered locations rise to the level of reportable events to DSAT. We have been made aware of the airflow irregularities this week as reported by Dr. Williams, but to date OSHE has not indicated that the 5252 .reported to them constitute loss of containment or a reportable [Diliairi S. .h a I event to DSAT. I am deferring to at this point for additional information regarding events this week and for con?rmation as to whether or not the air?ow irregularities noted require submission of a report to DSAT. Thank you for your request for clari?cation regarding the airflow irregularities. mire 42 use sz'ssam. Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:21 PM mr'a'eTas- ca" mina: Powell, Nathaniel (couple/mam) Subject: Se ect Agent question 2?2all'l In my select agent training it was pretty clear about the need to report any irregularities concerning select agent areas, 8o - -- agent room how much air is too much to blow into the clean corridor of mfg-:42 ""335 goes from negative to positive to the clean hallway even when no one is in the animal room. All of the rooms down here will do it with normal everyday traf?c so how much is too much? Ll ELC. 2E2ail'l' Framd ib:[3::42 sc. 2:32am I CEZID) Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 8:33 AM . To: Probst, Paul E. i Subject: Fw: Select Agent question . . Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 08:20 AM Eng-gifts; to"? 42 U-S-C- 5 was? I C'c: Williams, Allison CDC OID Powell, Nathaniel Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocoorosr-IE); w=raz42uscs2s2arm Martin, Diane Subject: Re: Select Agent question With regards to the doors we are seeing a "poof" when the animal room doors close hard. This "poof" is an instantaneous happening. I do not view this as a "reversal" but it does need to be resolved and should not be occurring. I was told this was taken care of yesterday but apparently not. FSE will again been down this morning for more adjustments. If the doors adjustments don't fix it we have alternatives. Now, if there are other issues, lfwe need to be made aware ofthem. To date all i have been told about is what we are referring to as the door issue. lfthere are other issues, Paul and Jeffwili be down this morning. Ser. 08:00 AM To: U-S-C- was Cc: Williams, Allison Powell, Nathaniel Howard, William Bill 5.25am cocrororur?F?o), 1w} I we? I I Subject: RE: Select Agent question . raysy42irs_c_ 252arh; I?m including [buggies-s and Bill Howard from DSHE on this response so they can address your question rbH3t42lJ .- 262m: rvariurn. You are correct in that we do eXpect notification of events such as airflow reversals that represent a departure from requirements to ensure for compliance with the select agent regulations, particularly if the situation requires reporting of the event to DSAT. Please do continue to bring such events to our attention. We rely on OSHE and Program personnel to assist in risk assessments to determine whether or not operating irregularities in select agent registered locations rise to the level of reportable events to DSAT. We have been made aware of the airflow irregularities this week as reported by Dr. Williams, but to date OSHE has not indicated that the airflow issues reported to them constitute loss of containment or a reportable event to DSAT. I am deferring to [reggae-hiss at this point for additional information regarding events this week and for confirmation as to whether or not the airflow irregularities noted require submission of a report to DSAT. Thank you for your request for clarification regarding the airflow irregularities. itI'lE'?42 252 Sill.- From: US 0. 252mb: (CDCIOIDIN CEZID) Sent: 'l'hursdav, February 23, 2012 1:21 PM CE: 1 rams, [son Powell, Nathaniel Subject: Select Agent question In my seIect agent'training it was pretty clear about the need to report any irregularities concerning select agent areas. So for a seiecl mils-,4 us 0 f? ;agent room how much air is too much to blow into the clean corridor of 262mb:- down here ,goes from negative to positive to the clean hallway even when no one i will do it with normal everyday traf?c so how much is too much? lLlilEH-the animal room. All of the rooms Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: (cocxocoorosaa Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 ?213 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Imam?SC-?262alm CDCIDIDINCEZID) Cc: Branch, Ivan (CDCIOGOOIBFO) Powell, Steven L. Sheppard. Jeffery D. (Jeff) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: Re: air ?ow said he would be there. He gets in around 8:30. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Frida Februa 24, 2012 07:14 AM To: Cc: Branch, Ivan CDCIOCOOZBFO) Powell, Steven L. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Subject: RE: air flow ljust heard from Ivan. He said that he is getting with donning PPE, and will adjust doors this morning. Can someone from OSHE be there to smoke test, and con?rm setup so that we can bring closure to this? Thanks, Paul Probst Frum: Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 2:55 PM To: (cocrocoorosm Cc: Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCOCIZBFO) Probst, Paul E. Powell, Steven L. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) (CDQOCDDKOSHE) Subject: RE: air ?ow Pat, I looked at the areas I could get into and tested the doors for me in 5.. [Eng-533:: Door leading from anteroom to procedure is kicking out air hard into the corridor and needs to be slowed down. Door separating procedure from animal holding pushes back and could stand to be slowed down a bit. WT, {unassigned} - Door leading from anteroom to procedure is kicking out air into the corridor and needs to be 2523: slowed down. 2623 h] 42 us - Door separating procedure from animal holding pushes back fairly hard and needs to be slowed down. [bl-i3 '42 It Don?t. know. about-the areas. 262th We can deal with the adjustments tomorrow. From: Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 2:00 PM Subject: Fvv: air flow Can you look at this!l From: (CDCIUCOOIOSHE) Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 01:54 PM To: Powell, Donald Probst, Paul E. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Subject: Fw: air ?ow Let's get down there an look at them again. are you here tomorrow to assist? From: Williams, Allison (CDCJOIDXNCEZID) Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 01:32 PM To: ma Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: RE: air flow US C. 2EEall'l. llcocroromcezro) Yes, I do believe that is correct. However, the door adjustment did not eliminate the reversal of airfrom inside the procedureienimal room area into the clean corridor. From: (coo/ocoorosea Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:30 PM To: Williams, Allison (CDCJOIDJNCEZID) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel (coolers/momma Subject: Re: air ?ow Ll ELC. 252alh: (cocon/Ncezro) was informed all the doors were adjusted From: (cocroromcezro) Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 01:15 PM (cocrocoO/OSHE) (cocroromcezro); T0: 0 ?252a Cc: mile lbil?i Subject: air flow Hill-[3 42 US C. 5} 252mb:- F'at, what?s the next step to address the continued air?ow issues in As of--~today, -- arestili- reported as having reversal issues. Please advise. Thanks. ?f?son Wifficmls CPDCI DIARB 1600 Clifton Road, N15 {3-15 Atianta, Georgia 30333 404-639-3316 (office) 404-235-5162 {fax} Mathe, Chester From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFQ . Sent: 4, 2012 ?:(cocroloiNoEZIo); (CDCKOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Branch, lvan Powell, Steven L. Sheppard, Jeffery D, (Jeff) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: RE: air ?ow -- ljust heard from Ivan. He said that he is getting wit donning PPE. and will adjust doors this morning. Can someone from OSHE be there to smoke test, and con?rm setup so that we can bring closure to this? Thanks, Paul Probst - - i- (CDCIOIDJNCEZID) Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 2:55 PM To: Cc: Branch, Ivan Probst, Paul E. Powell, Steven L. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: RE: air flow - . I looked at the areas 1 could get mm and Peter tested the doors for me I seem: 4 0.8.0. 2E2aln -- Door leading from anteroom to procedure is kicking out air hard into the corridor and needs to be slowed down. Door separating procedure from animal holding pushes back and could stand to be slowed down a bit. [oi-:13. 4 US (3 202aln Door leading from anteroorn to procedure is kicking out air into the corridor and needs to be slowed down. - Door separating procedure from animal holding pushes back fairly hard and needs to be slowed down. [26230.1 areas. We can deal with the adjustments tomorrow. ary 23, 2012 2:00 PM Can you look at this! i ii From: Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 01:54 PM To: Powell, Donald Probst, Paul E. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Subject: Fw: air ?ow Let's get down there an look at them again. Jeff are you here tomorrow to assist? El From: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDJNCEZID) Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 01:32 PM To: {cocrocoozosaa Cc: Powell, Nathaniel in?: 52523th Subject: RE: air flow Yes, I do believe that is correct. However, the door adjustment did not eliminate the reversal of air from inside the prooedurefanirnal room area into the Clean corridor. . (coo/ocooroSHE) Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:30 PM To: Williams Allison CDCIDIDINCEZID) Cc: Subject: Re: air flow U.S.C. 252al'l'l.- OIDX CEZID) I was informed all the doors were adjusted From: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDJNCEZID) Sent: Thursda February.r 23, 2012 01:15 PM To: (cocrocoO/OSHE) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: air flow :12 U5 I IlJlIEli'42 USE rails 12 us .: 7523,? 252301: Pat, what's the next step to address the continued air?ow issues As of today, i:i are still being reported as having reversal issues. Please advise. Thanks, ?ffison Wif?cmts 1600 Clifton Road, MS (3-15 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 404-639-3316 {of?ce} 404-235-5162 [fax] Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: Thursday. February 23, 2012 3:11 PM To: Ib'-f3'-Z42 use. 252mm (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Cc: Branch, Ivan (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Probst, Paul E. Powell, Steven L. - Sheppard. Jeffery D. (Jeff) Subject: Re: air ?ow Thanks We did not deal with any ante-room doors. The other doors should have already been addressed so Ivan will you please look at all the doors tomorrow and adjust as needed. {bl {Eli-42 USEC 2523 From: WW 5-9 (CDCJOIDXNCEZID) Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 02:55 PM To: (comma/owe) Cc: Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Probst, Paul E. Powell, Steven L. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Subject: RE: air ?ow I looked at the areas I could get into and tested the doors for me i Lb?ir?B} 2 2323. - Door leading from anteroom to procedure is kicking out air hard into the corridor and needs to be slowed down. Door separating procedure from animal holding pushes back and could stand to be slowed down a bit. 252mb - Door leading from anteroom to procedure is kicking out air into the corridor and needs to be slowed down. - Door separating procedure from animal holding pushes back fairiy hard and needs to be slowed down. Eb??ii?zztid?? kn owabout the areas. We can deal with the adjustments tomorrow. [El From: (cocrocoorosas) Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 2:00 PM To: rosaraz (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Subject: Fw: air?ow Can you look at From: Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 01:54 PM To: Powell, Donald Probst, Paul E. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) (CDCIOCOUIOSHE) Subject: Fw: air flow Let's get down there an look at them again. are you here tomorrow to assist? [El From: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 01:32 PM To: (cociocooioms) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel (comets/Nelson)! Subject@2023?? hf (CDCKOIDXNCEZID) Yes, i do believe that is correct. However, the door adjustment did not eliminate the reversal of air from inside the procedurei'animal room area into the clean corridor. From: Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:30 PM To: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDXNCEZID) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: Re: air flow Ibil3}:42 U5 2623l 11 was informed all the doors were adjusted From: Williams, Allison Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 01:15 PM To: (cociocooiosns) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: air ?ow LIE C. 2623412 are still being reported as having reversal issues. Please advise. Thanks, J?tf?son Wif?ams 1600 Clifton Road, MS (3-15 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 404-539-3316 (of?ce) 404-235-5162 (fax) Mathe, Chester (coorocooroser??l From: I ?33155 Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 2:55 PM To: SH E) Co: Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Probet, Paul E. Powell, Steven L. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) (CDCIOCDOIOSHE) . Subject: air ?ow Pat, slowed down. Door separating procedure from animal holding pushes back and could stand to be slowed down a bit. 52m": Door leading from anteroorn to procedure is kicking out air into the corridor and needs to be slowed down. - Door separating procedure from animal holding pushes back fairli,r hard and needs to be slowed down. Don?t know about the areas. We can deal with the adjustments tomorrow. From: Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 2:00 PM To: . Subject: Fw Can you look at thisll!! - - Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 01:54 PM To: Powell;r Donald Probst, Paul E. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) (CDCIOCOOXOSHE) Subject: Fw: air ?ow Let's get down there an look at them again. Jeff are you here tomorrow to assist? From: Williams, Allison Sent: Thursda bruary 23, 2012 01:32 PM To: (coprocoorosw) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel I 253W Subject: RE: air ?ow Yes, I do believe that is correct. However, the door adjustment did not eliminate the reversal of air from inside the prooedureianimal room area into the clean corridor. From: (cos/ocoozosns) Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:30 PM To: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: Re: air flow Ib}l3}242 Ci ?2523Ihl I was informed all the doors were adjusted From: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDKNCEZID) Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 01:15 PM To: (cocrocoorosns) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: air ?ow [bliE'L'lQ US Cl. 253mm! NCEZI D) Pat, what?s the next step to address the continued airflow issues in A i . As of today. . are still being reported as having reversal issues. Please advise. Thanks. ?f?ison Williams 1500 Clifton Road, MS (5-15 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 404-639-3316 (office) 404-235-5162 (fax) Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 2:01 PM I To: Powell, Steven L. Subject: Fw: air flow got the wrong guy From: (cocrocoorosrls) Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 01:54 PM To: Powell, Donald Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFO): Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) Subject: Fw: air ?ow Let's get down there an look at them again. Jeff are you here tomorrow to assist? From: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 01:32 PM To: more Co: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: RE: air flow Ibil'3i.42 US Cl ?2EEalhl Yes, i do believe that is correct. However, the door adjustment did not eliminate the reversal of air from inside the procedureianimal room area into the clean corridor. From: (CDQOCUOIOSH E) Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:30 PM To: Williams, Allison F710) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: Re: air ?ow 1 i was informed all the doors were adjusted 3i242 5.1? 2523ll'l: (cocrommcezm) From: Williams, Allison Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 01:15 PM To: (cocrocoorOSHE) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: air ?ow 2623-I1I I . [onslazuso what's the next step to address the contlnued alrflow lssues In . As of today, reported as having reversal issues- are still being Please advise. Thanks, ?lms on Wiffiams 1600 Clifton Road, M5 6-15 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 404-639-3315 {of?ce} 404-235-5152 [fax] Mathe, Chester From: - '1 Sent: Thur day, February 23, 2012 1:54 PM To: Powell, Donald Probst, Paul E. Sheppard, Jeffery D. (Jeff) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: Fw: air flow Let's get down there an look at them again. Jeff are you here tomorrow to assist? From: Williams, Allison Sen uary 23, 2012 01:32 PM To: Cc: Powell, Nathaniel '?P'fus? We?: Subject: RE: air?ow Yes, I do believe that is correct. However, the door adjustment did not eliminate the reversal of air from inside the procedurefanimal room area into the clean corridor. From: USC. 252801} Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:30 PM To: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel I 3523'?? I (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Subject: Re: air ?ow was informed all the doors were adjusted From: Williams, Allison (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Thursday, February,' 23, 2012 01:15 PM To: 1.. (CDCKOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel Subject: air flow Pat, what's the next step to address the continued air?ow issues in buildin are still being reported as having reversal issues. Please advise. Thanks, Affison Wif?om 1600 Clifton Road, MS (3?15 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 404-539-3316 {office} 404-235-5162 {fax} Maths, Chester From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Thursda February 23, 2012 7:13 AM To: Branch, lvan (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium The doors were switched. I understand that is going into the hot rooms today to adjust the door closers. Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639?1528 From: Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 6:19 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Bel?eld, Emanuel (CTR) Cc: Prohst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium Did this get done yesterday? From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Wednesda February 22, 2012 10:35 AM To: Branch, Ivan (coctocoosto) Bel?eld, Emanuel (coo/ocoo/BFO) (CTR) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFOJ Subject: RE: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium Mil-[3' :13 U5 C1 [0133242 USE. 2523'? are done and they have access into asaaln: . Ivan will have to coordinate the other 4 rooms To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOJBFO) (CIR) Subject: RE: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium [033,242 Ll SC. 5 252801. He should be able to get into: for adjustments and for door turns (clean). are hot and will need to enter fromiainside. He will need to be escorted to for Hot labs. us c. Eli?alh': c- From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:16 AM . Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan Bel?eld, Emanuel (CTR) Subject: RE: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium Wayne has adjusted the door in the one room we could get into and as you stated or Will have to dress out 10 check and adjust the remaining doors. is sending {bli?i into to. turn 55 Ivan, Can you 0 dress out and check the remaining doors to ensure they are not slamming shut? Thanks Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-539-15?8 From: Sent: Wednesday; February 22, 2012 10:10 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Subject: RE: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium Please let me know when all the doors have been adjusted. Let's try and get this done today so we can put it to bed. Thanks From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 3:15 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (cocxocooraFo); Branch, Ivan (coo/ocoorBFO) (cm) Subject: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium . FSE and I looked at an issue with the air ?ow from the lab rooms into the clean corridor. When other doors are opened there is a possibility that the air ?ow may go positive for a brief amount of time into the outer clean corridor. As a temporary test we have taped cardboard on the opening in the glass but have left a 3-4" opening. This has increased the negative air ?ow from the clean corridor through the opening and we tested opening and closing doors and negative air flow was maintained. We will observe these doors for several days to see if this may heIp the situation. Steven Powell FMED Building Manager 404-639-1578 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 5:19 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Co: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: Air flow Issues in Vivarium Did this get done yesterday? [El From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesda February 22, 2012 10:35 AM To: (cocgocoon?JSHE); Branch, Ivan Bel?eld, Emanuel (CTR) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium I. lIf?E,,' 5 :g I'E?r3li42 SE. 252mb:- l:l are done and they have access into: Ivan will have to coordinate the other 4 rooms From: Sent: Wednesday, Februaryr 22, 2012 10:32 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan Bel?eld, Emanuel (CTR) Subject: RE: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium $522,? He should be able to get into for adjustments andl are hot and will need to enter from inside. He will need to be escorted to for Hot labs. Ibex-:42 I: From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCKOCOOKBFO) Sent: Wednesda February 22,. 2012 10:15 AM To: me Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan (CDCIDCOOKBFO) Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CIR) Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium you stated room or will have to dress out to US I 2 . ?15} has adjusted the door in the one room we oou. to a -- turn- the 2?2aihz- check and adjust the remaining doors. is sending 'bI-I?r into Ivan, Can you or ress out and check the remaining doors to ensure they are not slamming shut? Thanks Steven l. Powell FMED Building Manager 404-639-15?8 From: Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:10 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFU) (CTR) Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium Please let me know when all the doors have been adjusted. Let's and get this done today so we can put it to bed. Thanks From: Powell, Steven L. (CDC/ocoofeFo) Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 3:15 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (cocxocoO/BFO); (cociocooxosus); Branch, Ivan (coo/ocoorsroi (CTR) Subject: Air flow Issues in Vivarium FSE and I looked at an issue with the air ?ow from the lab rooms into the clean corridor. When other doors are opened there is a possibility that the airflow may go positive for a brief amount of time into the outer clean corridor. As a temporary test we have taped cardboard on the opening in the glass but have left a 3-4? opening. This has increased the negative air flow from the clean corridor through the opening and we tested opening and closing doors and negative air ?ow was maintained. We will observe these doors for several days to see if this may help the situation. Steven Powell FM E0 Building Manager 404-639-1578 Maths, Chester From: - . . (coolocoomsas) Sent: Thursday, February 23. 2012 6:19 AM To: Powell, Steven L. (cocrocooreFO); Branch, lvan {cocrocoorBFOJ Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOIBFW (CTR) Co: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: Air ?ow issues in Vivarium Did this get done yesterday? From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Wednesda February 22, 2012 10:35 AM - . news! Branch, Ivan Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium are doneand. they-have assess-into . ill have to coordinate the other 4 rooms From: (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:32 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan (CDCZOCOOJBFO) Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCJOCOOJBFO) (CTR) Subject: RE: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium [tillE'ZJ-2 Ll SC. 253.301. US C1 He should be able to get int for adjustments and a . for door turns (clean). are not and will need to enter from inside. He will need to be escorted to for Hot labs. E3 From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesda February 22, 2012 10:16 AM To: me Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan Bel?eld, Emanuel (CTR) Subject: RE: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium has adjusted the door in the one room we could get into and as you stated lvan or Clive will have to dress out to check and adjust the remaining doors. Bel is sending Wayne into fit, to turn the doors around as we discussed. Ivan, Can you or Clive dress out and check the remaining doors to ensure they are not slamming shut? Thanks Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-539?1578 From: ,?Dilg-?Eggal I ital (cocrocoorosaa Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:10 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan (CTR) Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium Please let me know when all the doors have been adjusted. Let?s try and get this done today so we can put it to bed. Thanks [El From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 3:15 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoostO); Branch, Ivan (cocxocooiero) (cm) Subject: Air flow Issues in Vivarium FSE and I looked at an issue with the air flow from the lab rooms into the clean corridor. When other doors are opened there is a possibility that the air flow may go positive for a brief amount of time into the outer clean corridor. As a temporary test we have taped cardboard on the opening in the glass but have left a 3?4" opening. This has increased the negative air flow from the clean corridor through the opening and we tested opening and closing doors and negative air flow was maintained. We will observe these doors for several days to see if this may help the situation. Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639-1578 Maths, Chester (cocrocoorosem From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesda Fbruary 22, 2012 10:35 AM To; .. Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Bel?eld. . Emanuel (coorocooreFOJ (CTR) Cc: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium I .. aredone- and they-have accessinto?. will have to coordinate the other4 rooms From: Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:32 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan Bel?eld, Emanuel (CTR) Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium I for door turns (clean). are hot and will need to enter from inside. He will need to be escorted to for Hot labs. ans-2 .2: $23.3: able to-ge-t-i-nto- for adjustments and I From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Wednesda February 22, 2012 10:16 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (cocrocooxsFo); Branch, Ivan (cocrocooraFO) Bel?eld, Emanuel (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium Wayne has adjusted the door in the one room we con oer irto . I you stated Ivan or Clive will have to dress out to check and adjust the remaining doors. is sending M5) into to turn the doors around as we discussed. Ivan. Can you or Clive dress out and check the remaining doors to ensure they are not slamming shut? Thanks Steven Powell FileO Building Manager 404-639-1578 From: engage) wane/ocoorosna Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:10 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan (CTR) Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium Please let me know when all the doors have been adjusted. Let's try and get this done today so we can put it to bed. I Thanks ID From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 3:15 PM To: Probst, Paul E. . A Subject: Air flow Issues in Vivarium Branch, Ivan (CDCKOCOOIBFO) (CTR) FSE and I looked at an issue with the air flow from the lab rooms into the clean corridor. When other doors are opened there is a possibility that the air ?ow may go positive for a brief amount of time into the outer clean corridor? As a temporary test we have taped cardboard on the opening in the glass but have left a 3-4" opening. This has increased the negative air flow from the clean corridor through the opening and we tested opening and closing doors and negative air flow was maintained. We will observe these doors for several days to see if this may help the situation. Steven Powell FM E0 Building Manager 404?639-15?8 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: Wednesc ay, February 22, 2012 10:32 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch. Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Bel?eld. Emanuel (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Subject: RE: Arr flow Issues In Vivarium mm, U5, ,3 2E28Ihl I iti?fsriil2 SE. I :12 LI 5-: He should be able to get into 2523"? for adjustments and: for door turns (clean). -- . are hot and will need to enter from inside. He will need to be escorted to for Hot labs. IEI From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Wednesda February 22, 2012 10:15 AM . To: Ha". 5: Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan (CIR): Bel?eld, Emanuel (CTR) Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium Wayne has adjusted the door in the one room we could get into and as you stated Ivan or Clive will have to dress out to check and adjust the remaining doors. sending into turn the doqla?igundas mil?: U5 I. I1 lvan, Can you or Clive dress out and check the remaining doors to ensure they are not slamming shut? Thanks Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639-1528 From: gist-2,2,1Wtcoorocoorosaa Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:10 AM To: Powell, Steven Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Subject: RE: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium Please let me know when all the doors have been adjusted. Let?s try and get this done today so we can put it to bed. Thanks [El From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 3:15 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (cocrocoo/BFO); sax-.9" Branch. Ivan (CTR) Subject: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium FSE and i looked at an issue with the air ?ow from the lab rooms into the clean corridor. When other doors are opened there is a possibility that the air flow may go positive for a brief amount of time into the outer clean corridor. As a 1 temporary test we have taped cardboard on the opening in the glass but have left a 34" opening. This has increased the negative air flow from the clean corridor through the opening and we tested opening and closing doors and negative air flow was maintained. We will observe these doors for several days to see if this may help the situation. Steven Powell FM E0 Building Manager 404-639-15?8 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesda Fbruary 22, 2012 10:15 AM To: F'robst, Paul E. (cocrococveFoi; Branch, Ivan Bel?eld, Emanuel (CTR) Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium Wayne has adjusted the door in the one room we could get into and as you stated Ivan or Clive will have to dress out to check and adjust the remaining doors. is sending Wayne into to turn the doors around as we disoUssed. Ivan, Can you or Clive dress out and check the remaining doors to ensure they are not slamming shut? Thanks Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639-15?8 . -. . . Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:10 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan (CTR) Subject: RE: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium Please let me know when all the doors have been adjusted. Let's try and get this done today so we can put it to bed. Thanks From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 3:15 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (coefocooxeFO); Branch, Ivan (coo/ocooraFO) (cm) Subject: Air flow Issues in Vivarium FSE and I looked at an issue with the air ?ow from the lab rooms into the clean corridor. When other doors are opened there is a possibility that the air ?ow may go positive for a brief amount of time into the outer clean corridor. As a temporary test we have taped cardboard on the opening in the glass but have left a 3-4? opening. This has increased the negative air ?ow from the clean corridor through the opening and we tested opening and closing doors and negative air flow was maintained. We will observe these doors for several days to see if this may help the situation. Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:10 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst. Paul E. Branch, [van (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium Please let me know when all the doors have been adjusted. Let?s try and get this done today so we can put it to bed. Thanks El From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 3:15 To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Air ?ow Issues in Vivarium Branch, Ivan (couocoojsso) (cm) FSE and I looked at an issue with the air flow from the lab rooms into the clean corridor. When other doors are opened there is a possibility that the airflow may go positive for a brief amount of time into the outer clean oorridor. As a temporary test we have taped cardboard on the opening in the-glass but have left a 3?4? opening. This has increased the negative air flow from the clean corridor through the opening and we tested opening and closing doors and negative air flow was maintained. We will observe these doors for several days to see if this may help the situation. Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639-1578 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: - . (CDCIOCODIOSHE) Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 5:58 AM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. Branch, Ivan (CTR) Cc: Howard, William (Bill) [Wire at. 2623's? Subject: RE: Air flow Issues in Vivarium As you know OHSE was never a big fan of the oversized slots on those doors so it would not hurt our feelings to have them changed out. With that said before the December shut down we did not have this issue, so something has changed between then and now. We need to figure out what that change is. From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCIOCUOJBFO) Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 3:15 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Air flow Issues in Vivarium Branch, Ivan (CDCJOCODIBFD) (CTR) FSE and I looked at an issue with the air ?ow from the lab rooms into the clean corridor. When other doors are opened there is a possibility that the air ?ow may go positive for a brief amount of time into the outer clean corridor. As a temporary test we have taped cardboard on the opening in the glass but have left a 3-4" opening. This has increased the negative air flow from the clean corridor through the opening and we tested opening and closing doors and negative air flow was maintained. We will observe these doors for several days to see if this may help the situation. Steven Powell FM E0 Building Manager 404-639?1578 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Powell. Steven L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, February 21. 2012 3:15 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (coorocoorsFO); (cocrocoorOSHE}; Branch. Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR) Subject: Air flow Issues in Vivarium FSE and I looked at an issue with the air flow from the lab rooms into the clean corridor. When other doors are opened there is a possibility that the air flow may go positive for a brief amount of time into the outer clean corridor. As a temporary test we have taped cardboard on the opening in the glass but have left a 3-4? opening. This has increased the negative air flow from the clean corridor through the opening and we tested opening and closing doors and negative air flow was maintained. We will observe these doors for several days to see if this may help the situation. Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639-1573 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Powell, Nathaniel Sent: Wednesca Aril 25, 2012 3:2? PM To: Probst, Paul E. Powell, Steven L. (cocrococrsFO); Ayers, Jessica Howard, William (Bill) Co: Black, Carolyn Ayers, Jessica Jenkins, Leecresia T. Eworonsky, Peter J. Subject: RE: Vivarium Thanks for the information. vvill be available to participate in the walk through. M5. Jenkins and Mr. Eworonskv will be available to enter the suite. Thanks From: In (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 2:39 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Powell, Steven L. Powell, Nathaniel Ayers, Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: Vivarium DSHE would like to do a walk-through of the vivarium on Monday, April 30'? at 8:30 am. The purpose of this walk-through is to re+verify that the animal room doors are continuing to close properly. We will need someone from ARB with access to enter all the labs while OSHE observes. We would also like appropriate FSE personnel to be present so that immediate on site adjustments of the doors can be made if necessary. Thanks El Maths. Chester From: Chandler. George Sent: Wednesday, April 2012 1:32 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Meeohan, Paul J. Bowen, Ken L. Probst. Paul E. Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: air?ow issue- 3rd draft BFO final Air?ow reversal iss. . . Final BFO comments are included. Thanks very much. Pauli G.- From: Henderson, Joseph (CDCIOCODIOSEP) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 1:29 PM To: Chanc?er, George Meechan, Paul J. Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: air?ow issue- 3rd draft Paul, would like to see this as well so I can provide an update to our leadership. Thanks for taking the lead on this and gathering all the input. Joe Joseph M. Henderson Director, Office of Security and Emergency Preparedness Lead for the Consolidation of Office of the Logistics Management Bra in PGO. Centers for Disease Controi and Prevention (CDC) U. S. Department of Haaitn and Human Services 404-639-2131 From: Chandler, George Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:43 AM To: Meechan, Paul J. Bowen, Ken L. Henderson, Joseph Probst, Paul E. Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: -: air?ow issue- 3rd draft Paul could you please send your current version with all changes for one last quick pass? Thanksl From: Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:45 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Henderson, Joseph Probst, Paul E. 1 Chandler, George Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: of?? a air?ow issue? 3rd draft Thanks Ken. Most of the changes are ?ne and I'll add them, but a couple are problems. 1. This is required by the 5th edition of"Biosafetv in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories? for facilities and is enforced by Select Agent regulations, however building was designed and constructed under the edition of the BMBL. {underline words were added). True, but DSAT has made it clear that there is no grandfathering. In an executive brie?ng, it?s a ?ne point that shouldn?t be the focus of the debate. And it will be if it is added. 2. The evaluation by OSHE was that although there was a "puff" of air out through the-leuv-ev?s slotted windowsheuleknet-haveec?eu?ed, there was no exposure risk to those at the door during the incident. The "slotted window" is the correct term and will be used, but I can?t take out that it should not have occurred. it should not have. It did, and it was no risk, but the entire point ofthis letter is that an issue was observed and ?xed and it posed no risk. 1 think we need to stay awayr from the argument that it was OK to happen. I had that discussion with George yesterday regarding this precise wording. George wants to go forward on our argument regarding trivial air leakages fromlabs, and if I don?t get traction at NIH on the 24m, we?ll go down that path, but right now we don?t have ground to stand on{Sentence deleted). l?ve been given that statement from multiple members present at the discussion. l'm not sure that was deleted. From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIDCODIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 7:48 AM To: Meechan, Paul J. - ii 1' - Henderson, Joseph innatevac?mam .. - Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George (CDCXOCOOIBFO Bianchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODIBFO) ,Ilol' Subject: RE uscf'as air?ow issue- 3rd draft 2523M Paul, Here are Paul Probst and my comments. File: Airflow reversal issuedocx Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-639-3303 Of?ce 404?639-0499 Fax From: Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) Sent: Tuesda Ari] 10, 2012 4:16 PM Hm?? CD 010 Powell, Nathaniel CDC Henderson, Joseph (cocxocooloSEP); "beirizu-S-C was? (coclocoO/OSHE); Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. 2 (CD OCOO BFO Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) (C Subject: d. ir?ow issue? 3rd draft File: Airflow reversal issuedocx Hello all- Third draft. incorporating comments from BFD. Please let me know if you have additional changes. If not, I?ll send this up the food chain at 8 a tomorrow. Thanks Paul Paul J. Meechan, Director, Of?ce of Safety, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, M15 F-DS Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 404-539-3147 fax: 404?639-0383 OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap] r? Procedings at Date of Incident: February 16. 2012 [Dita-'12 262mm more us252mm. .. . livanum are designed to contain Infectious agents ia a a I the external corridors, providing continuous airflow into the rooms. This is required bv the edition of "Biosafetv in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories? (BMBL) to facilities and is enforced by Select Agent regulations. The precise wording for the current version of the BMBL is: 5252mm use i . . gazam :Presentat initialeventsl -- I I ns C: madam-.1- Thle viewe?uw?mmtheuggdeangemrid.J viewing use. a 252mm through the. 552mm '3 oor. While viewing prairie dogs held within the room, a door between the Eroom an - $335552 room closed with greater force than required, sending a small ?puff? of air out through the slotted window and into the face of the DSAT visitor. Initial 2523'? I . Initial response: The prairie dogs were convalescmg after an experiment with a 252mm The animals I'm3 ?2 Us ?3 52523??- I They were also the ?rst animals housed in the room after the room I had been decontaminated earlierin the year. The evaluation bv DSHE was that although there?wasa "qur? of air out through the-slotted window should not have occurred. there was no exposure risk to those at ?1e door during the incident. All compliance parties involved determined no exposure occurred and thusit did not triggerthe requirement that exposures be reported to DSAT. The closure issue was explained to Dr. Allison Williams in ARE. A call was made to BFD to have the doors in the suite I examined and door closers were adjusted autism-dew . Subsequent response: A meeting was recommended by Dr. Nate Powell and was attended bv members ofthe RO's office, DSHE, BFD, HCL manager and ARE. The incident was discussed and the follow up actions were provided. It was made clear that although the incident should not have happened and adesmeheshssamade Format-em Showman ,response: Bill Howard (OSHEI provided a written response to both Dr. Powell and' and that has been given to Ms. Dixon. Ms. Dixon met with Dr. Powell on 10 April to discuss herconcerns. The other CDC compliance organizations (R0. are willing to meet with her and Dr. Powell at their convenience. Dr. Carolvn Black (Director, will be providing additional information to management shortly. Additional information: 1. All BuildinSelec?t Agent animal suites have been tested to ensure compliance with the BMEL requirements. The data have been shared with DSAT, as required by DSAT. current design of the animal facility does not have an anteroom leading to the central corridor at the back of the animal room. Workers leaving the animal room to the central corridor need to spray decontaminate any,I animal racks being removed for cleaning, and then remove their potentiallyr contaminated jumpsuit at the back end of the room before taking the decontaminated rack out the back door. RFD, DSHE and i??iRB investigated options for anterooms, including a proposal for plastic anterooms to be constructed, but they would have provided little additional oontainment while creating signi?cant space restrictions. For these reasons, anterooms were not constructed. Vivarium staff have instead chosen to wear their resoiratori,r protection while in the central corridor. 2:3. BFO has reviewed the PM for this area to ensure that door closers are evaluated annuallv for adiustments to groger set goints. Since PM occur; yheg this grea is down for periodic decon it is criticallv important that laboratorv staff and DSHE personnel promotiv rgport incidents such as this so that that BFD can make arrangements for access to this sgage to make regairs or adiggtments. Mathe, Chester (CDCIUCOOIOSEP) From: Prohst. Paul E. Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 8:4? AM To: Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (CTR Cc: Powell, Steven L. Subject: FW: Vivarium Ivan: I am scheduled to be out of the of?ce Monday. Please make arrangements for someone to he in PAPR and be able to adjust door closers if necessary. This is followup to incident from February- Thanks, F'aul Prohst From: WEDUOCOWOSHE) Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 2:39 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOO BFCJ Powell Steven L. Powell, Nathaniel Ayers, Jessica Howard, William (Bill) Subject: Vivarium OSHE would like to do a walk-through of the vivariurn on Monday. April 30?" at 8:30 am. The purpose of this walk-through is to re-verify that the animal room doors are continuing to close properly. We will need someone from ARB with access to enter all the labs while OSHE observes. We would also like appropriate FSE personnel to be present so that immediate on site adjustments of the doors can he made if necessary. Thanks Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday. January 21, 2011 ?:49 AM To: Joe. I :e R. Subject: FW: Egress unis-.42 26231in From: Probst, Paul Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM To: Willie I effery Subject: r31?? Vivarium Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. have attached both the commissioning agent?s report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lot). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 12.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lbf. Since the project modi?ed air ?ow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply With your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. Cx Report 2. NFPA 101 ?2000 3. ASHRAE Formula - - I a? -- NFPA 101- mm: was. . 4 ashrae formula.pdf For ease of reference, this is what the Cx report states: ?The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushtpull the door inwardfoutward before turning the handle and opening the door.? Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Branch, Ivan (CTR) Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 8:49 AM To: Probst, Paul E- (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Re: Vivarium Consider it done. I will be off tomorrow. Have a great weekend. From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 08:46 AM To: Branch, Ivan (CTR Cc: Powell, Steven L. Subject: FW: Vivarium 1am; Ivan: i am scheduled to be out of the of?ce Monday. Please make arrangements for someone to be in PAPR and be able to adjust door closers if necessary. This is follow-up to incident from February. Thanks, Paul Probst From: Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 2:39 PM Steven L. Powell, Nathaniel Ayers, Jessica Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: Vivarium OSHE would like to do a walk-through of the vivarium on Monday, April 30?" at 8:30 am. The purpose of this walk?through is to re?verify that the animal room doors are continuing to close properly. We will need someone from ARE with access to enter all the labs while OSHE observes. We would also like appropriate FSE personnel to be present so that immediate on site adjustments of the doors can be made if necessary. Thanks Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Henderson, Joseph Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 1:29 PM To: Chandler, George Meechan, Paul J. Bowen, Ken L. Proust, Paul E. Blanchard, Thomas M. (CE Subject: RE: airflow issue 3rd draft Paul, I would like to see this as well so I can provide an Update to our leadership. Thanks for taking the lead on this and gathering all the input. Joe Joseph M. Henderson Director, Office of Security and Emergency Preparedness 8: Lead for the Consolidation of OSEF',Oitice of the Logistics Management Branch in PGD. Centers for Disease Controi and Prevention (CDC) U. S. Department of Heaith and Human Services 404-639-7131 From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:43 AM To: Meechan, Paul J. Bowen, Ken L. Henderson, Joseph Prohst, Paul E. Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Subject: RE: 37,35 ir?ow issue- 3rd draft could you please send your current version with all changes for one last quick pass? Thanks! From: Meechan, Paul J. (CDCJOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:45 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Henderson, Joseph Prohst, Paul E. Chandler, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: ir?ow issue- 3rd draft Thanks Ken. Most of the changes are ?ne and Hi add them, but a couple are problems. 1. This is required by the edition of "Biosafetv in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories" for facilities and is enforced by Select Agent regulations, however huildingwas designed and constructed under the 4th edition of the EM BL. {underline words were added). True, but DSAT has made it clear that there is no grandfathering. In an executive brie?ng, it?s a ?ne point that shouldn't be the focus of the debate. And it will be if it is added. 2. The evaluation by DSHE was that although there was a ?puff? of air out through the-laseer slotted there was no exposure risk to those at the door during the incident. The "slotted window" is the correct term and will be used, but I can?t take out that it should not have occurred. It should not have. it did, and it was no risk, but the entire point of this letter is that an issue was ohsenied and fixed and it posed no risk. I think we need to stay away from the argument that it was OK to? happen. I had that discussion with George vesterdal reear ing this precise wording. George wants to go forward on our argument lCililIdZ regarding trivial air leakages frorr gig-gs, labs, and itl don?t get traction at NIH on the we?ll go down that path, but right now we don?t have ground'to stand on. 1 US 252mm Ind? :12 252mm members present at the discussion. I?m not sure why that was deleted. From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 2:48 A To: Meechan, Paul J. CD DID Powell, Nathaniel CD Henderson, Joseph 5252mm Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paui E. (CDCIOCDDIBFD) ir?ow issue- 3rd dra?: LLS 252.3th Subject: RE Paul. Here are Paul Probst and my comments. ss File: Airflow reversal issuedocx Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404-639?3303 Office 404-639-0499 Fax From: Meechan, Paul J. 0, 2012 4:16 PM To: Powell, Nathaniel Henderson, Joseph (cociocooxoseri); Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve (CDCIOIDJNCEZID): Chandler, George Bowenchard, Thomas M. cc: ll Subject: 35516:? air?ow issue- 3rd draft ?on: File: Airflow reversal issuedocx Hello all? Third draft, incorporating oomments from BFO. Please let me know if you have additional changes. If not, I'll send this up the food chain at 8 a tomorrow. Thanks Paul Paul J. Meechan, Director, Office ofSafetv, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, MKS F-OS Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 404-639-3142 fax: 404-639-0883 [u OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) Procedings at Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Henderson, Joseph Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 1:29 PM To: Chandler, George Meechan, Paul J. Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Blanchard, Thomas M. (qumgp'tiBFoi Subject: RE: User-ass air?ow issue- 3rd draft Paul, I would like to see this as well so I can provide an update to our leadership. Thanks for taking the lead on this and gathering all the input. Joe Joseph M. Henderson Director, Office of Security and Emergency Preparedness a Lead for the Consolidation of OSEP,Oftice of the Logistics Management Branch in PG 0. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) U. S. Department of Heaith and Human Services 404-639-?131 From: Chandler, George Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:43 AM To: Meechan, Paul J. Bowen, Ken L. Henderson, Joseph Probst, Paul E, CDC Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: air?ow issue- 3rd draft =21 2 Paul a could you please send your current version with all changes for one last quick pass? Thanks! From: Meechan, Paul J. Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:45 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Henderson,_Joseph Probst, Paul E. Chandler, Geore Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: ir?ow issue? 3rd draft Thanks Ken. Most ofthe changes are fine and I'll add them, but a couple are problems. 1. required by the 5th edition of?Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories" for facilities and is enforced by Select Agent regulations, however buildi_ng was designed and constructed under the 41? edition of the BMBL. {underline words were added). True, but DSAT has made it clear that there. is no grandfathering. In an executive briefing, it?s a fine point that shouldn?t be the focus of the debate. And it will be if it is added. 2. The evaluation by DSHE was that although there was a "puff" of air out through the-leavers slotted there was no eXposure risk to those at the door during the incident. The "slotted window? is the correct term and will be used, but I can't take out that it should not have occurred. It should not have. It did, and it was no risk, but the entire point ofthis letter is that an issue was observed and fixed and it posed no risk. I think we need to stay away from the argument that it was OK to happen. I had that discussion with George yesterdayrearding this precise wording. George wants to go forward on our argument regarding trivial air leakages fro Haj-5'5 labs, and ifl don?t get traction at NIH on the 24?, we?ll go down that path, but right now we don?t have ground to stand on. 1 members present at the discussion. l?m not sure why that was deleted. Ittlji3- US '3 From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 7:48 AM To: Meechan, Paul J. Powell, Nathaniel Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve (CDCIOIDINCEZIDE Chandler, George CDC Henderson, Joseph BIanchard,-Thomas M. Inle- Bowen, Ken L. {coczocoorssoy Probst, PauI E. (cocxocooxarm Subject: irfiow issue? 3rd draft Paul, Here are Paul Probst and my comments. File: Airflow reversal issuedoox Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-639-3303 Of?ce 404-639-0499 Fax From: Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIDCOOIOSHE) Sent: Tuesda Arii 10, 2012 4:16 PM CD OID Poweli, Nathaniel CDC OID Henderson, Joseph (CDCIOCDOIOSEP Probst, Paul E. (coo/ocooxerm Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. (CDCJOCDDIBFD Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sdbject: air?ow issue- 3rd draft File: Airflow reversal issue.docx Hello aii- Third draft, incorporating comments from Please let me know if you have additional changes. lfnot, I'll send this up the food chain at 8 3 tomorrow. Thanks Paul Paul J. Meechan, Director, Of?ce of Safety, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 404639-314? fax: 404-639-0883 OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap] Procedings at Mathe, Chester (CDCJOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 12:26 PM To: Williams, Jetterr Bowen, Ken L. Paul E. Subject: FW at". '15 ir?owissue? 3rd draft Friends: Please take a look at alternative language for #3 below rather than a .. From: Meechan, Paul J. (cocrocooroseel Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 12:24 PM To: Chandler, George Subject: RE: air?ow issue- 3rd draft Air?ow reversal issue From: Chandler, George Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:43 AM To: Meechan, Paul J. Bowen, Ken L. Henderson, Joseph Probst, Paul I Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: air?ow issue- 3rd draft Paul could you please send your current version with all changes for one last quick pass? Thanks] From: Meechan, Paul J. Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 201.2 9:45 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOKBFO): Henderson, Joseph (CDCJOCOOIDSEP): Probst, Paul E. Chandler, Geo roe Blanchard, Thomas M. lunch.? Subject: RE: uses ir?ow issue- 3rd draft Thanks Ken. Most of the changes are ?ne and I?ll add them, but a couple are problems. 1. This is required by the 51th edition of "Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories? (BM for facilities and Is enforced bv Select Agent regulations, however building Elves designed and constructed under the 4th edition of the Blv'lBL. (underline words were added}. True, but DSAT has made it clear that there is no grandfathering. In an executive brie?ng, it?s a fine point that shouldn?t be the focus of the debate. And it will be ifit is added. 2. The evaluation by DSHE was that although there was a "putF? of air out through the-leaver slotted there was no exposure risk to those at the door during the incident. The "slotted window? is the correct term and will be used, but I can?t take out that it should not have occurred. It should not have. It did, and it was no risk, but the entire point of this letter is that an issue was observed and '1 fixed and it posed no risk. I think we need to stay away,f from the argument that it was OK to happen. i had that discussion with George yesterday regarding this precise wording. George wants to go forward on our argument regarding trivial air leakages from labs, and ifl don't get traction at NIH on the 24th, we?ll go down that path, but right now we don?t have ground to stand on..-: {Sentence deleted). I?ve been given that statement from multiple members present at the discussion. I?m not sure that was deleted. From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2D12 7:48 AM To: Meechan, Paul J. m3? MUS-C: @2523?, Powell, Nathaniel Henderson, Joseph (cociocooroseri); -- Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George (CDC OCOO BFD - Blanchard, Thomas M. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: air?ow issue- 3rd draft Paul, Here are F?aul Proost and my comments. File: Airflow reversal issuedocx Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404?639?3303 Of?ce 404-639-0499 Fax From: Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCDDXOSHE) Se 10, 2012 4:16 PM To: "315?- Powell, Nathaniel CDC OID Henderson, Joseph new! (cocrocm/OSHE); Prolast, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. (CD 0030 BFD Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Subject eye, 425 air?ow issue" 3rd draft File: Airflow reversal issuedocx Hello all- Third draft, incorporating comments from BFO. Please let me know if you have additional changes. If not, I'll send this up the food chain at 8 a tomorrow. Thanks Paul Pauli. Meechan, Director, Office ofSafetv, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, MKS F-DS Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 404?639-3147 fax: 404-639-0883 OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) Procedings at us '5 252m; nasal-42 use. a 2623m- IJS 262mb; IJS C: 262mb; US Cl 252mb:- us 0 252mb; Date of Incident: February 16, 2012 . . . mira- a: use. 5 2523 Locatlon: Vlvarlum, m; Background: Ilivariurn are designed to contain infectious agents I. . . . .. I the external corridors, providing continuous airflow into the rooms. This is required by the 5?h edition of "Biosafetv in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories" fofacilities and is enforced by Select Agent regulations. The precise wording for the current version of the BMBL is: [til-I'E-I 42 USE. 2523m- inj:[3::42 us 252mm I _Pr.ESen.t I .. I Incident: The viewers were in the "clean" corridor viewinJ imam" Iareas through the I moreu.s.I::.s2E:2arm I While viewing prairie dogs held within the room, a door between the room and 0- oom closed with greater force than required, sending a small ?puff? of air out through the slotted window and into the face of the DSAT visitor. [b;r3i42 LIE. 2B2aih: responders: . I Initial response: The prairie dogs were convalescing after an experiment with The animals .. .. They were also the first animals housed in the room after the room had been decontaminated earlier in the year. The evaluation by DSHE was that although there was a ?puff? of air out through the-slotted window should not have occurred, there was no exposure risk to those at the door during the incident. All compliance parties involved determined no exposure occurred and thus it did not trigger the requirement that exposures be reported? to DSAT. The closure issue was explained to Dr. Allison Williams in ARE. A call was made to BFO to have the doors in the suite I examined and door closers were adjusted within days. Subsequent response: A meeting was recommended by Dr. Nate Powell and was attended by members of the RO's of?ce, OSHE, BFO, HCL manager and ARE. The incident was discussed and the follow up actions were provided. It was made clear that although the incident should not have happened and repairs have been made, the personnel at the door were never at risk. us 9-523: m. Written response: Bill Howard provided a written response to both Dr. Powell and -- and that has been given to Ms. Dixon. Ms. Dixon met with Dr. Powell on 10 April to discuss her concerns. The other CDC compliance organizations (RD, DSHE) are willing to meet with her and Dr. PowelI at their convenience. Dr. Carolyn Black (Director, DSR) will be providing additional information to management shortly. Additional information: 1. All BuildinSelect Agent animal suites have been tested to ensure compliance with the BMBL requirements. The data have been shared with DSAT, as required by DSAT. 2. The current design of the animal facility does not have an anteroom leading to the central corridor at the back of the animal room. Workers leaving the animal room to the central corridor need to spray decontaminate any animal racks being removed for cleaning, and then remove their potentially contaminated jumpsuit at the back end of the room before taking the decontaminated rack out thelback door. BFO, OSHE and ARE investigated options for anterooms, including a proposal for plastic ""3523 anterooms to be constructed, but they would have provided little additional containment while creating signi?cant space restrictions. For these reasons, anterooms were not constructed. Vivarium staff have instead chosen to wear their respiratory protection while in the central corridor. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, George Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 12:26 PM To: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. F'robst, Paul E. (CD I Subject: FW: irfiow issue- 3rd draft Friends: Please take a look at alternative language for #3 below rather than a From: Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOXOSHE) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 12:24 PM To: Chandler, [bil'3l42 Subject: RE: use. air?ow issue- 3rd draft Absolutely. Here it is. Airflow reversal issue From: Chandler, George Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:43 AM To: Meechan, Paul J. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Henderson, Joseph Probst, Paul E. Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE:airflow issue? 3rd draft Paul could you please send your current version with all changes for one last quick pass? Thanks! (3.- From: Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCDDIOSHE) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:45 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Henderson, Joseph Probst, Paul E. Chandler, Geo gaff: Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: air?ow 3rd draft CIF-Clzuh: Thanks Ken. Most of the changes are ?ne and I'll add them, but a couple are problems. 1. This is required by the edition of "Biosafetv in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories? (BMBL) for facilities and is enforced by Select Agent regulations, however buildin ned and constructed under the edition of the BM BL. (underline words were added]. True, but DSAT has. made it clear that there is no grandfathering. In an executive brie?ng, it's a ?ne point that shouldn?t be the focus of the debate. And it will be if it is added. 2. The evaluation by USHE was that although there was a "puff" of air out through the-lessees slotted there was no exposure risk to those at the door during the incident. The "slotted window" is the correct term and will be used, but i can?t take out that it should not have occurred. It should not have. It did, and it was no risk, but the entire point of this letter is that an issue was observed and 1 ?xed and it posed no risk. I think we need to stay away from the argument that it was OK to happen. I had that discussion with George yesterday I ding this precise wording. George wants to go forward on our argument regarding trivial air leakages from [Lila-'53 abs, and if I don?t get traction at NIH on the we'll go down that path, but right now we don?t have ground to stand on{Sentence deleted). I?ve been given that statement from multiple members present at the discussion. I?m not sure why that was deletedFrom: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 7:48 A To: Meechan, Paul J. Powell, Nathaniel Henderson, Joseph ?is; . .523,? Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George (C Blanchard, Thomas M. Cc 'tjl??i Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. 35H: 2 ir?ow issue- 3rd draft roars, 42 use. :3 2523111 bit} 42 DE E. Paul, Here are Paul Proost and my comments. ?Is File: Air?ow reversal issuedocx Thanks1 Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404-639?3303 Of?ce 404-639?0499 Fax From: Meechan, Paul J. 5e A 10, 2012 4:16 PM maTog M??3""5?252m" Powell, Nathaniel Henderson, Joseph Proost, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. (CDC OCOO BFO lanchard, Thomas M. - ir?ow issue- 3rd draft ., Subject Ll so. s25 File: Airflow reversal issue.docx Hello all- Third draft, incorporating comments from BFO. Please let me know if you have additional changes. If not, PM send this up the food chain at 3 tomorrow. Thanks Paul Paul J. Meechan, Director, Of?ce of Safety, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, MKS Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 404-639-314? fax: 404-639-0883 OLE Object: Picture {Device Independent Bitmap) Procedings at Date of Incident: February 16, 2012 - . - - baa-1m: -3 \twanum, IJS 262th; StatUlE Lava-42 USE. 2?2alh,? mire-42 US 0 s} . Backgroundxj. vivarium are designed to contain infectious agents .. I [D}[3l242 U.S.C 2E-Eall'l'r is is required by the 5th edition of the external corridors, providing continuous airflow into the rooms. WM facilities and is enforced by "Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories" for Select Agent regulations. The precise wording for the current version of the BMBL is: 2?2arh! [one Present at initial event: Incident: The viewers were in the "clean" corridor . viewingl llareas through thel While viewing prairie dogs held within the room, a door between the room and room closed with greater force than required, sending a small "puff" of air out through the slotted window and into the face of the DSAT visitor. 252mb} I Initial responders.2132all1: Initial response: The prairie dogs were convalescing after an experiment with -- I. They were also the first animals housed in the room after the room had been decontaminated earlier in the year. The evaluation by OSHE was that although there was a "puff" of air out through the-slotted window should not have occurred, there was no exposure risk to those at the door during the incident. All compliance parties involved determined no exposure occurred and thus it did not triggerthe requirement that exposures be reported to DSAT. The closure issue was explained to Dr. Allison WilIiams in ARE. A call was made to BFO to have the doors in the suite examined and door closers were adjusted within days. Subsequent response: A meeting was recommended by Dr. Nate Powell and was attended by members of the RO's office, DSHE, BFO, HCL manager and ARE. The incident was discussed and the follow up actions were provided. It was made clear that although the incident should not have happened and repairs have been made, the personnel at the door were never at risk. rbe .42 us cg response: Bill Howard (OSHE) provided a written response to both Dr. Powell and 'l?lriHan and that has been given to Ms. Dixon. Ms. Dixon met with Dr. Powell on 10 April to discuss her concerns. The other CDC compliance organizations (R0, are willing to meet with her and Dr. Powell at their convenience. Dr. Carolyn Black (Director, DSR) will be providing additional information to management shortly. Additional information: 1. All Buildinelect Agent animal suites have been tested to ensure compliance with the BMBL requirements. The data have been shared with DSAT, as required by DSAT. 2. The current design of the animal tacilih,?r does not have an anteroorn leading to the central corridor at the back of the animal room. Workers leaving the animal room to the central corridor need to spray decontaminate any animal racks being removed for cleaning, and then remove their potentially contaminated jumpsuit at the back end of the room before taking the decontaminated rack out the back door. BFD, DSHE and ARB investigated options for anterooms, including a proposal for plastic anterooms to be constructed, but they would have provided little additional containment while creating signi?cant space restrictions. For these reasons, anterooms were not constructed. Vivarium staff have instead chosen to wear their respiratory protection while in the central corridor. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:43 AM To: Meechan, Paul J. Bowen, Ken L. Henderson. Joseph Probst, Paul E. Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFCI) Subject: RE: ir?ow issue? 3rd draft Paul could you please send your current version with all changes for one last quick pass? Thanks! From: Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:45 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Henderson, Joseph Probst, Paul E. Chandler, George Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: air?ow issue- 3rd draft Thanks Ken. Most of the changes are fine and I?ll add them, but a couple are problems. 1. This is required by the 5th edition of "Biosafetv in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories? for facilities and is enforced by Select Agent regulations, however building was designed and constructed under the allH1 edition of the BM BL. (underline words were added]. True, but DSAT has made it clear that there is no grandfathering. In an executive brie?ng, it?s a fine point that shouldn't be the focus of the debate. And it will be if it is added. The evaluation by OSHE was that although there was a "puff" of air out through theJe-usess slotted windowsaeuld?eet?haveeseasred, there was no exposure risk to those at the door during the incident. The "slotted window" is the correct term and wilI be used, but I can?t take out that it should not have occurred. It should not have. It did, and it was no risk, but the entire point of this letter is that an issue was observed and ?xed and it posed no risk. I think we need to stay away from the it was OK to happen. 1 had that discussion with George vesterdav regarding this precise wording. George wants to go forward on our argument regarding trivial air leakages from IEEI labs, and if I don?t get traction at NIH on the we?ll go down that path, but right now we don?t have ground to stand on. can 4 {Sentence deleted}. l?ve been given that statement from multiple members present at the discussion. I?m not sure why that was deleted. From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, april 11, 2012 ?:48 AM To: Meechan, Paul J. . . Powell, Nathaniel CDC Henderson, Joseph . . 'ii3r-l?2 US C: i. Egan Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCKOCOOIBFO) CE: I [we Subject: RE: Paul, Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. . air?ow issue? 3rd draft Here are Paul Probst and my comments. ss File: Airflow reversal issuedocx be Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404-639-3303 Of?ce 404-639?0499 Fax From: Meechan, Paul J. (CDCKOCOOIOSHE) Se - 2012 4:16 PM mmpTo ?1?93? ?ti-0mm Powell, Nathaniel coconomcezm); Henderson, Joseph (cocrocooxosna; Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. (CDC OCOO BFD Blanchard, Thomas M. eggs? Subject: irflow issue- 3rd draft File: Airflow reversal issue.docx Hello all? Third draft, incorporating comments from BFO. Please let me know if you have additional changes. If not, I'll send this up the food chain at a tomorrow. Thanks Paul Paul J. Meechan, Director, Office of Safety, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, MKS F-OS Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 404-639-3147 fax: 404-639-0883 OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) Procedings at Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) i From: Chandler, George Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 10:12 AM To: Meechan, Paul J. Bowen, Ken L. Henderson, Joseph Probst, Paul E. Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: REzirflow issue- 3rd draft PaulB Ken: I am comfortable with Paul's inclusion of our concerns as stated below. The air flow reversal issue, as states below, is a major point here and that is why we want to go forward with internal BM BL implementation language that was developed some months ago when this issue surfaced. We could have minor air flow reversal ("puffs") from a variety of causes this on happened to be the door-=? and bring de?nition to ?air ?ow reversal." Thanks! (3. From: Meechan, Paul J. Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:45 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Henderson, Joseph Probst, Paul E. Chandler, Geore Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: RE: dais?? 25 irflow issue? 3rd draft Thanks Ken. Most ofthe changes are ?ne and I?ll add them. out a couple are problems; 1. This is required by the edition of"Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories? (BMBL) for use? Ea acilities and is enforced by Select Agent regulations, however building as designed and constructed under the edition of the BMBL. (underline words were added]. True, but DSAT has made it clear that there is no grandfathering. In an executive brie?ng, it?s a fine point that shouldn?t be the focus of the debate. And it will be if it is added. 2. The evaluation by DSHE was that although there was a ?puff? of air out through the-leavers slotted there was no exposure risk to those at the door during the incident. The "slotted window" is the correct term and wiil be used, but I can't take out that it should not have occurred. It should not have. It did, and it was no risk, but the entire point of this letter is that an issue was observed and fixed and it posed no risk. Ithink we need to stay away from the argument that it was OK to happen._ I had that discussion with George yesterday - arding this precise wording. George wants to go forward on our argument regarding trivial air leakages fro labs, and ifl don?t get traction at NIH on the 24?, we'll go down that path, but right now we don?t have ground to stand on. 3. {Sentence deleted). l?ve been given that statement from multiple members present at the discussion. I?m not sure was deleted. From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 ?:48 AM To: Meechan, Paul J. Powell, Nathaniel Henderson, Joseph . Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George (CDC OCOO BFO Blanchard, Thomas M. gait-i? . .- - Bowen, Ken L. (cocrocoo/sro); Probst, Paul E. (couocoorsrm I Subject: RE air?ow issue- 3rd draft U5 6262.1 mire-42 252mm C: 252m,- Paul, Here are Paul Probst and my comments. File: Airflow reversal issuedocx be Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404-539-3303 Of?ce 404-639-0499 Fax From: Meechan, Paul J. Sent: Tuesda A ril 10, 2012 4:16 PM To Powell, Nathaniel CDC DID Henderson, Joseph -- -- -- Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Ianchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) ir?ow issue- 3rd draft Subject: r975 {ct File: Airflow reversal issuedocx Hello all- Third draft, incorporating comments from BFO, Please let me know ifyou have additional changes. if not, I'll send this up the food chain at 8 3 tomorrow. Thanks Paul Paul J. Meechan, Director, Office of Safety, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, MKS Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 404639-314? fax: 404-539-0883 OLE Object: Picture {Device Independent Bitmap) Procedings at aszam: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:45 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Henderson, Joseph Probst, Paul E. Chandler, George Blanchard. Thomas M. (COIBFO) - Subject: RE air?ow issue? 3rd draft Thanks Ken. Most of the changes are ?ne and I'll add them, but a couple are problems. 1. use 25 This is required by the 5th edition of "Biosafetv in Microbiological and Biome I La boratories? (BMBL) for facilities and is enforced by Select Agent regulations, however buildin was desi ned and constructed under the 4m edition of the BMBL. {underline words were added). True, but DSAT has made it clear that there is no grandfathering. in an executive brie?ng, it's a ?ne point that shouldn't be the focus of the debate. And it will be if it is added. The evaluation by OSHE was that although there was a ?puff? of air out through the-leavers slotted there was no exposure risk to those at the door during the incident. The ?slotted window? is the correct term and will be used, but I can't take out that it should not have occurred. It should not have. It did, and it was no risk, but the entire point of this letter is that an issue was observed and ?xed and it posed no risk. 1 think we need to stay away from the argument that it was OK to happen. I had that discussion with George yesterday - ding this precise wording. George wants to go forward on our argument regarding trivial air leakages fro labs, and if I don?t get traction at NIH on the 24th, we'll go down that path, but right now we don"t have ground to stand on. I El .II . (Sentence deleted). I?ve been given that statement from multiple members present at the discussion. l?m not sure why that was deleted. From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 ?:48 AM F'robst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: 5 Paul, Powell, Nathaniel - 2am}. eorge air?ow issue? 3rd draft Here are Paul Probst and my comments. File: Air?ow reversal issuedocx ea Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-839-3303 Office 404-639?0499 Fax lumen-2 262mm From: Meechan, Paul J. Ser t: Tuesday. April 2012 4:16 PM To: Powell, Nathaniel CD DID Henderson, Joseph teaegomorosee - (cocyocoorosaa; Probst, Paul E. (CocxocooxaFO) cxommcezm); Chandler, George (cocrocooreFO); Bowen, Ken L. (CD 0 Blanchard, Thomas M. Cc: ir?ow issue- 3rd draft File: Air?ow reversal Hello all? Third draft, incorporating comments from BFO. Please let me know if you have additional changes. if not, I'll send this up the food chain at 8 a tomorrow. Thanks Paul Paul J. Meechan, I Director, Office of Safety, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, F-05 Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 404-639-3147 fax: 404?639-0883 OLE Object: Picture (Device independent Bitmap} Procedings at Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Meechan, Paul J. (CDCJOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Wednesda Aril 11, 2012 9:32 AM To: comer ., Joseph Probst, Paul E. Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard. Thomas M. Black, Carolyn CEZID) Co: in? 'bil'?i? Subject: issue- 3rd draft Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID Thanks gentlemen- i stand corrected. Not much room would be left in the animal holding room if a was placed in there. I will make that change. From Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:30 AM - 'u . I. Meechan Paul J. Henderson, Joseph Eight. .. . Probst, Paul E. (cocrocooraeo); Monroe, Steve Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. (CD DCOD BFO Black, Carolyn to? Subject: RE: r' ti ir?ow issue? 3rd draft USE 2E . is correct regarding it being inside the animal holding area and not the central corridor. However, the amount of space that would have been needed to accommodate the bubble was still problematic [along with equipment main ?enanceJ from my perspective. us as ans-.m- From: Powell, Nathaniel Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:2? A _To: Meechan, Paul CDC OCOO Henderson, Joseph Bait?tti?'?mcoojosee (cocrocoozosnej; Probst, Paul E. Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. (CDC OCOO BFO Blanchard, Thomas M. Black, Carolyn (CDCJOIDINCEZID) sat? Subject: ir?ow issue- 3rd draft have one comment concerning the third draft of the air flow attachment The bioBubble unit we discussed would not have created a significant impact on available space in the central hallway. The entire unit would have been placed within the animal room with negligible loss of space and the ability to provide a transition area between the animals and the central hallway. Thanks I From: Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOKOSHE) Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 4: 16 PM To: CDC DID Powell, Nathaniel CDCIOID Henderson, Joseph flail? (cocxocoofoSHE); Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. WW, chard, Thomas M. 5523.?; r- Subject: ir?ow issue- 3rd draft File: Airflow reversal issue.docx Hello all- Third draft, incorporating comments from BFO. Please let me know if you have additional changeal If not. send this up the food chain at 8 a tomorrow. Thanks Paul Paul J. Meechan, Director, Of?ce of Safety, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, MIS F-DS Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 404-639-3147 fax: 401-639-0883 DLE Object: Picture [Device independent Bitmap) Procedings at Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: U5 @252? Sent: Wednesda A ri 11.2012 9:30 AM To: Meechan. Paul J. Henderson, Joseph (encrocoorosee); . . . Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Sieve Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. (cocmcooi'eFoi; Blanchard, Thomas M. Black. Carolyn Co: Subject: Nate is correct regarding it being inside the animal holding area and not the central corridor. However, the amount of space that would have been needed to accommodate the bubble was still problematic (along with equipment From: Powell, Nathaniel Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:27 AW To: Meechan, Paul J. CDC OCOO ?262ainil CDC OID Henderson, Joseph Irma Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Black, Carolyn Cc: l?fi Subject: RE: use a air?ow issue? 3rd draft 252mm I have one comment concerning the third draft ofthe air flow attachment?The bioBubble unit we discussed would not have created a significant impact on available space in the central hallway. The entire unit would have been placed within the animal room with negligible loss of space and the ability to provide a transition area between the animals and the central hallway. Thanks NP From: Meechan, Paul J. 0, 2012 4:16 PM To: MW Powell, Nathaniel CDC DID Henderson, Joseph (cocrocoomSHE); Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. 0 Blanchard, Thomas M. Subject: use: air?ow issue- 3rd draft File: Air?ow reversal issuedocx Hello all? Third draft, incorporating comments from BFO. Please let me know if you have additional changes. If not, l'll send this up the food chain at 8 a tomorrow. Thanks Paul Paul J. Meechan, Director, Office of Safety, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1500 Clifton Road NE, F-OS Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 404639?314? fax: 404-639-0883 ?mi OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap} Procedings at Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEPJ From: Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:27 AM To: Meechan, PaulJ. (CDCIOCO I "13'3942'43-0 ?262aim Henderson, Joseph (cocrocoorosem; mm Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. Blanchard, Thomas M. Black, Carolyn CDCIOIDINCEZID) Co: MI. m: Subject: RE air?owissue- 3rd draft I have one comment concerning the third draft ofthe air ?ow attachment -The . - unit we discussed would not have created a significant impact on available space in the central hallway. The entire unit would have been placed within the animal room with negligible loss of space and the ability to provide a transition area between the animals and the central hallway. Thanks NP From: Meechan, Paul J. Sent: Tuesda An?l 10, 2012 4:16 PM To: lists-sues 5252a?. CDC DID Powell, Nathaniel CDC OID Henderson, Joseph ear 'f??ftmcoorossp), Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve Chandler, George Bowen, Ken L. (CD .FD Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: [Dildju?l? Subject: U-SH airflow issue- 3rd dra?: File: Airflow reversal issuedocx Hello all- Third draft, incorporating comments from BFO. Please let me know if you have additional changes. If not, send this up the food chain at 8 a tomorrow. Thanks Paul J. Meechan, Director, Office of Safety, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, F-05 Atlanta, GA 30333 - tel: 404-539-314? I fax: 404-539-0883 OLE Object: Picture [Device IndEpendent Bitmap) Procedings at Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Meeohan, Paul J- Sent: Tueeda Aril?l? 2012 4:16 PM To: (CDCIOIDINCEZIDE Powel, Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID Henderson, ., Probet, Saul E. Monroe, Sieve Chandler. George Bowen, Ken L. CDCIOCOOIBFO Blanchard, Thomas M. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Subject: o-o air?ow issue- 3rd draft Airflow reversal issuedocx Hello all-Third draft, incorporating comments from BFO. Please let me know if you have additional changes. If not, I'll send this up the food chain at 8 a tomorrow. Thanks Paul Paul J. Meechan, Director, Office ofSafetv, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, F-05 Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 404-539?3147 fax: 404?639-0883 I mm em; am ?tment-eta l2?l alia?a?t??i?ntt Procedings at mm m. US C: 262alh} USE. 262mm 42 262mb:- IJS C: 2B2alh; 113.8542 5C 252mm US 0 262mm 2E2auh; Background: . providing continuous airflow into the rooms. This is required by the edition of Date of Incident: February 16, 2012 lLlil'j .312 USE. 2B2a[ 1: Location: Vivarium irivarium are designed to contain infectious agents mall]: 25 acilities and is enforced by ?Biosafetv in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories? (BMBL) fo U'j'gf' Select Agent regulations. The precise wording for the current version of the BMBL is: Present at initial event: ?Didi? 252? 1 i . Hdean" .c?r?d m. a reas through the i While viewing prairie dogs held within the room, a door between them room and - - om closed with greater force than required, sending a small ?pair? of air out through the louvers adjacent to the viewing window and into the face ofthe DSAT visitor. Initial respondersi I us Initial response: The prairie dogs were convalescing after an experiment with'The-a-n-imals. ..2a2aihi .. I They were also the first animals housed in the room after the room had been decontaminated earlier in the year. The evaluation by DSHE was that although the air Feveesai?muff? out through the louvers should not have occurred, there was no exposure risk to those at the door during the incident. All compliance parties involved determined no exposure occurred and thus it did not trigger the requirement that exposures be reported to DSAT. The closure issue was explained to Dr. Allison Williams in ARE. A call was made to BFD to have the doors in the suite examined and door closers were adjusted within days. Subsequent response: A meeting was recommended by Dr. Nate Powell and was attended by members of the HUB of?ce, DSHE, BFO, and ARB. The incident was discussed and the follow up actions were provided. It was made clear that although the incident should not have happened and repairs have been made, the personnel at the door were never at risk. Written response: Bill Howard provided a written response to both Dr. Powell and I: and that has been given to Ms. Dixon. Ms. Dixon is meeting with Dr. PoweII on 10 April to discuss her concerns. The other CDC compliance organizations (R0, are willing to meet with her and Dr. Powell at their convenience. Additional information: All Buildin Select Agent animal suites have been tested to ensure compliance with the EM BL requirements. The data have been shared with DSAT, as required by DSAT. The current design of the animal facility does not have an anteroom leading to the central corridor at the back of the animal room. Workers leaving the animal room to the central corridor need to spray decontaminate any animal racks being removed for cleaning, and then remove their potentially contaminated jumpsuit at the back end of the room before taking the decontaminated rack out the back door. and ARE messed-investigated options for anterooms to be constructed, but they anterooms, including a proposal for plastic would have provided little additional containment while creating significant space restrictions in the central corridor. For these reasons anterooms were not constructed. -Vivarium staff have instead chosen to wear their respiratory protection while in the central corridor. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: To: Subject: FYI - the aftermath Thanks, Paul Probst Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Tuesday. April 10, 2012 3:0? PM Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) FW: Second draft of air?ow issue letter Ibil3?42 US C. NCEZI D) Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:39 PM I To: Monroe, Steve Meechan Paul J. I 1 Ih?lfg USC- haniel . . Probst, Paul E. Subject: RE: Second draft of air?ow issue letter My changes (made from Steve?s attached file]. Fair?ow revarsal issue_as .docx. . . From: Monroe, Steve Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:26 PM To: Meechan, Paul J. F1 Cc: Monroe Steve (CDQOIDINCEZID Powell Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID): Probst, Paul E. (cocrocooreFo); {abs-3:111: i3 UE Subject: FW: Second draft of air?ow issue letter My editsfcomments. so. szssam: please check for accuracy in what I?ve written. Thanks. Steve From: Meechan, Paul J. Ser t: Tuesdav, April 10, 2012 2:11 PM To: (CU 252mm [b13342 2E2aih'l' Cc: Powell, Nathaniel CDC OID Henderson, Joseph 0 Monroe, Steve (CDCJOIDINCEZID) Probst, Paul E. Subject: Second draft of air?ow issue letter File: Airflow reversal issuedocx a: Paul J. Meechan, Director, Of?ce ofSafetv, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, NUS F-05 Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 4104?6396147 fax: 404-639-0883 OLE Object: Picture {Device Independent Bitmap) Procedings at Date of incident: February 16, 2012 Location: Vivariumtbn31142 SE. mirage 252mm -- Invarium are designed to contain arr-aniectious agents lugs-r Comment [spun]: Drperhapsi'lbttentially Wilt-?42 0- i I . mannered air" . . . . 233"?? l- -. I Lbsi'?ii?j? theexternal corridors, providing continuous airflowinto the rooms. Tl?is is required by the 5 edition of a - us c. "Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories? for atilitiesand is-enfereed-by Select Agent regulations. The precise wording for the current version of the BMBL is Ibsen-12 US 'bi'ET: Present at l?lttal eventl 42USC '2 allIncident: The viewers were in the "clean" corrido u. c. s25 [mm-42 U5 0 ?2b2alhi through the procedure room door. While viewing prairie dogs held within the room, a door between the oom an room closed with greater force than designed, sending a areas . Elig?tl'll uses small ?puff? of air out through "ii ?omm?nt correct? lassume ?ie .?gol'l??J idh't go'tl'iro' ugh a glass window. visitor. Initial responders: .mo ops Initial response: The prairie dogs we re convalescing after an experiment with The animals - - 2E2aih: nuts, 42 us es 262mb;- IThey were aiso the ?rst animals housed in the room after the room been decontaminated earlier in the year. The evaluation by USHE was that although the air reversal should not have occurred, there was no exposure risk to those at the doordun?ng the incident. All compliance parties involved determined no exposure occurred and thus it did not trigger the requirement that exposures be reported to DSAT. The closure issue was explained to Dr. Allison Williams in ARE. A call was made to BFO to have the doors in the suite examined and defective door closers were adjusted within days. Subsequent response: A meeting was recommended by Dr. Nate Powell and was attended by members rmraiz42 use. . Raisin;- of the RO's of?ce, OSHE, BFO, and The incident was discussed and the follow up actions were provided. It was made clearthat although the incident should not have happened and repairs have been made, the personnel at the door were never at risk. Written response: Bill Howard provided a written response to both Dr. Powell and and that has been given to Ms. Dixon. Comment [cos]: And] rug-natal: I USE S2626 ll] v.3;242 . .. .. a Ms. Dixon is meeting with Dr. Powell on 10 April to discuss her concerns. The other CDC compliance organizations (R0, are willing to meet with her and Dr. Powell at their convenience. Additional information: 1. All Bulldingelect Agent animal suites have been tested to ensure compliance with the BMBL requirements. The data have been shared with DSAT, as required by DSAT. at the hack of the animal roonjl. Workers leavingthe animal room to th -. need Commenucua]: I refer to this area as the . . . 'cerl?l" corridor. This area lsnot dirty-Horn to spray decontaminate any animal racks herng removed for cleaning, and then remove therr ?Mum? potentially contaminated jumpsuitat the back end of the room before taking the decontaminated rack out the back door. and ARE supported a proposal for plastic anterooms to be constructed, but they I would have provided little additional containmentend-mpese-creating additional-significant space restrictions in the l'etorhnhallwadr staff have instead chosen to wear their respiratory Comment Restrictions would ha've been . . b_ kill-z" In the area (loss ofahout and them-was Whlle mt at- ?a l: -.L alloti'le problemofmalnte'nameahd failure: ofthe 1. equipment- Commenl: Main, central corridor. This area functions an a oommon ante-room entry back into areas where procedures and' cirpums'tances homage! nts] allow. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: I Icocrommcezm) Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:39 PM To: Monroe, Steve Meechan Paul .J. CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOIDINCEZID - me Probet. Paul (bir3lz42 USE. ?2623rh* Subject: RE: Second draft of air?ow issue letter My changes (made from attached file). Airflow reversal issue_as .docx. . . From: Monroe, Steve Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012' 2:26 PM To: Meechan. Pau J. (CDCIOCOOIOSH. Cc: WE: Powell, Nathaniel Probst, Paul E. (cocrocooreroy; *9 Wat? Subject: FW: Second draft of air?ow issue letter I'b:l3l:42 SE. 252mm My edits/comments. me ?p1ease check for accuracy in what I've Written. Thanks. Steve From: Meechan, Paul J. Sent: Tuesda Aril 10, 2012 2:11 PM To: U56 52523:?:- CDC OID Powell, Nathaniel CD Henderson, Joseph Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCODIBFO Monroe, Steve (CDCKOIDXNCEZID) Cc: Subject: Second draft of air?ow issue letter File: Airflow reversal issuedocx Paul J. Meechan, Director, Of?ce of Safety, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1500 Clifton Road NE, F-DS Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 404-639-3147 fax: 404-539?0383 OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) Procedings at imam: us r: 252ml? a Date of Incident: February 16, 2012 - uites within the Evivarium are designed to oontain aielnfe'etious-a'g'ehtsl Ni Comment or perhaps. ?memes? I I Unmm?m'? the external corridors, providing continuous air?ow into the rooms. This is required by the 5th edition of "Biosafetv in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories" forfacilities and is enforced by Select Agent regulations. The precise wording for the current version of the BM BL is lozlS :lE LIE sesame Present at initial eventl U53 I Ll SC. 2E2alh'- Incident: The viewers were in the ?clean? corridor - - i- - areas through the While viewing prairie dogs held within the holding roornJ a door .b;r3::42 ?252alhr between the andl loom closed with greaterforce than designed. sending a small ?puff? of air out through the _iouvers airline-em to thdviewing window and into the face of the DSAT ?esh-"if Comment [min]: I: thlsonrrect? lassurrlo the 'Tpuft?dldn'tgothrough agiau windows visito r. .. 32-42 3 - InItIaIresponders'l 'bi' 32f?? I I Initial response: The prairie dogs were convalescing afteran experiment with The animals U-E-C- ITheir were also the ?rst animals housed in the room after the room had been decontaminated earlier in the year. The evaluation by OSHE was that although theair raversal should not have occurred, there was no exposure risk to those at the door during the incident. All compliance parties involved determined no exposure occurred and thus it did not trigger the requirement that exposures be reported to The closure issue was explained to Dr. Allison Williams in ARE. A call was made to BFO to have the doors in the suite examined and defective door closers were adjusted within days. Subsequent response: A meeting was recommended by Dr. Nate Powell and was attended by members of the of?ce. BFU. and provided. It was made clear that although the incident should not have happened and repairs have been made. the personnel at the door were never at risk. Written response: Bill Howard provided a written response to both Dr. Powell and - :'and that has been given to Ms. Dixon. Ms. Dixon is meeting with Dr. Powell on 10 April to discuss her conce ms. The other CDC compliance organizations are willing to meet with her and Dr. Powell at their convenience. Additional information: 1. All Building Select Agent animal suites have been tested to ensure compliance with the BMBL requirements. The data have been shared with DSAT. as required by DSAT. 2. The current design of the animal facility does not have an anteroom lea at the back of the animal room. Workers leaving the animal room to th Comment 1 re'r'erta thlsarea rem; th f? 'cent?ll' corridor. This area Is not dirtyifesit sprainr econtaminate analr amma rac eung remove or eanlng, an an we elr mum fallaw? potentially contaminated jumpsuit at the back end of the room before taking the decontaminated rack out the back door. and ARE supported a proposal for plastlcanterooms '03 be but thei? would have provided little additional containment end-moosecreating additional-significant space restrictiOns in the :return hallwa?. ARE. stal'fhave instead chosen to wear their re5pirator}: Comment Restrictions would have been -- - - in the; "animal are; {loss of about and ther? was F'r?tecnon Whlle 1? also th'e problem of maintenance and failure ofthe equi prnent. Can?lh'IEHt Again. central corridor. araafunctions an a common anteroom For entry back into areas where procedures and circumstances {sa me age ms} allow. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:35 PM To: Meeohan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOIOSHB Co: Powell, Nathaniel Proost, Paul E. Subject: RE: Second draft of air?ow issue letter 2 comments Airflow reversal issue From: Monroe, Steve Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:26 PM To: Meeohan, Paul J. Cc: Monroe Steve (CDCIDIDINCEZID) CDCIDIDINCEZID Powell Nathaniel I Probst, Paul E. $531.35 i Subject: FW: Second draft of air?ow issue letter I LIA-1C 252mm My editsfcomments. From: Meechahn, Paul J. (CDQOCODIOSHE) 0, 2012 2:11 PM CDC DID Powell, Nathaniel Henderson, Joseph . Probst, Paul E. I. :l To. Still? EDS. .-. (CDC DCDD BFD Monroe, Steve Esta-fees .. Subject: Second draft of air?ow issue letter File: Airflow reversal issuedocx Paul J. Meechan, Director, Office of Safety, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1500 Clifton Road NE, F-US Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 404-639-314? fax: 404-539-0883 co: OLE Object: Picture {Device Independent Bitmap] Procedings at Date of Incident: February 16. 2012 U5 Location: Vivarium. no.3 .42 use g. . .. 2E2alh: .._.__.Elackgro -- - - lvivarlurn are desrgned to contain aremfec?hous agents Comment [5111121]: or pe:hap:. ?persona-Hr U5 0 i I I contaminated air'- 252mm "LS-it? corridors, providing continuous air?ow into the rooms. This is__re quired by the 5'h edition of "Biosafetv in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories" foIILJf'sf?, 5 Facilities and is enforced bv Select Agent regulations. The precise wording for the current version of the EM BL is more: us I: ?252alhl 2:32am: Present at initial event: I ?313142 252mm I Incident: "clean" corridorl I muss 42 o. 252arh': [moi-42 US (3.5: 252mm through the i While viewing prairie dogs held within th between th U303 closed with greater force than eslgn - sending a beennv I smell "puff" of air out through the?odvers- adiacent to theiviewing window and into the fate of the DSAT -- Comment {mail}: I: mu correct? [assume ?Pun-"nu"- the ?pul?f" didn't go through aglass window. visitor. miter-42 us 0 I 252mm Initial responderl mine-:42 us r: saszam: initial res nose: The ralrie do swere convalescing after an experiment with: The animals .. They were also the ?rst animals housed in the room after the room had been decontaminated earlier in the year. 'Ihe evaluation by! OSHE was that although the air reversal should not have occurred,there was no exposure risk to those at the door during the incident. All compliance parties involved determined no exposure occurred and thus it did not trigger the requirement that exposures be reported to DSAT. The closure issue was explained to Dr. Allison Williams in ARE. A call was made to BFO to have the doors in the suite examined and defective door closers were adjusted within days. 262mm Subsequent response: A meeting was recommended by Dr. Nate Powell and was attended by members of the RO's office, OSHE, BFO, and ABS. The incident was discussed and the follow up actions were provided. It was made clear that although the incident should not have happened and repairs have been made, the personnel at the door were never at risk. my? 42 U56 Written response: Bill Howard (05H E) provided a written response to both Dr. Powell and .. 1: and that has been given to Ms. Dixon. Ms. Dixon is meeting with Dr. Pewell on 10 April to discuss her concerns. The other CDC compliance organizations (R0, are willing to meet with her and Dr. Powell at their convenience. Additional information: 1. All Buildineiect Agent animal suites have been tested to ensure compliance with the BMBL requirements. The data have been shared with DSAT, as reanired by DSAT. The current design ofthe animal facility does not have an anteroom leadin to th at the back of the animal room. Workers tearing the animal room to to spray decontaminate any animal racks being removed for cleaning, and then remove their potentially contaminated jumpsuit at the back end of the room before taking the decontaminated rack out the back door. and ARE supported a proposal for plastic ante rooms to be constructed, but they would have provided little additional co ntainmentandmpose-creating additional-signi?cant space restrictions in the return hallway. ARE- Vivarium staff have instead chosen to wear their respiratory protection while in the back hallway. Comment Technically not dirty; No items should ?nd thelr Way to the Inner corridor. Contaminated items should either be removed or sprayed down prior to entering inner _oorridor Maths, Chester (sociocoomsee) From: Monroe, Steve Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:26 PM To: Meeohan, Paul J. (CDGIOCOOIOS cc: Monroe, Steve (CDCIOIDJNCEZID Powell, Nathaniel (CDCIOCOOIDSHE): Probst, Paul E. FW: Second draft of airflow issue letter 0 0 rn Subject: My edits/comments. please check for accuracy in what I've written. Thanks. From: Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) Sent: Tuesda Arll 1t], 2012 2:11 PM To: ibll3ii42IJ.SC.?2623.I1; DC 010 Powell, Nathaniel CDCIOID Henderson, Joseph (sociocoorosee); Probst, Paul E. (CD II FD Monroe, Steve (CDCIOIDJNCEZID) Cam Subject: Second draft of air?ow issue letter Airflow reversal issue. docx Paul]. Meechan, Director, Of?ce ofSafety, Health, and Environment Conters for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, MIS F-05 Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 404-639-3147 fax: 4011-5390383 3195:? mid: In: car-1:1: its!? on {sieve-army 2 USTAI NAEILEW: Pnupic: - Practices." Precedings at?nvwwicdceovfbiosafetv Date of incident: February 16, 2012 . . ibil3?42U.5.C 2523 Location: lsilt-'arnim 35521:? a Backgroundd -- bivanum are designed to contain Comment [stroll]: Orperhaps, "potentially I I canumlnated air? [bl-i3i'42 u.s.c. -- -- . is . 252mb} . the-external corridors, providing continuous air?ow-info the?room. This is requrred by the 5 edition of "Eiiosafet?lir in Microbiological and'Bi'o'rhe-dical Laboratories" foracilities and is enforced by GE Seiect-Agenti??dlations. The precise wording for the current version of the BMBL is nasal as us .3. 252%: [misjrie us 0 252%: so. 252ain: I .. .. present auntie25231?: areas through theoor. While viewing prairie dogs held within oar-n; a oer .. between th Wis? 9 and [b:i3i142 usc. closed with greater force than designed, sending a mun-3342, U5 0 2d gal Ii}. I smell "puff" of air out through the Hoovers adiacent to Itthuiewing window ending:- the face of the DSAT Comment [5111122]: Iassurne the didn't go through a giass window. visitor. initial respondersJ [Dill-2:12 use. 252m:- I initial response: The prairie dogs were convalescing alter an experiment with --The-animals . .. - - They:r were also the ?rst animals housed in the room after the room had been decontaminated earlier in the year. The evaluation by OSHE was that although the air reversal I should not have occurred, there was no exposure risk to those at the'door during the incident. All compfiance parties involved determined no exposure occurred and thus it did not trigger the requirement that exposures be reported to DSAT. The closure issue was explained to Dr. Allison Williams in ARE. A call was made to BFO to have the doors in the suite examined and defective door closers were adjusted within days. was: us c: asaaim . Subsequent response: A meeting was recommended by Dr. Nate Powell and was attended by members of the of?ce, USHE, BFD, and ARB. The incident was discussed and the follow up actions were provided. It was made clear that although the incident should not have happened and repairs have been made, the personnel at the door were never at risk. Written response: Bill Howard provided a written response to both Dr. Powell $3333". that has been given to Ms. Dixon. ibli3i242 . Z?ggiuljjgu Ms. Dixon is meeting with Dr. Powell on 10 April to discuss her concerns. The other CDC compliance organizations (RD, OSHE) are willing to meet with her and Dr. Powell at their convenience. Additional information: 1. All Building Select Agent animal suites have been tested to ensure compliance with the BMBL requirements. The data have been shared with DSAT, as required by DSAT. The current design ofthe animal facility does not have an anteroom leadi . at the back of the animal room. Workers leaving the animal roomto the need to spray decontaminate any animal racks being removed for cleaning, and then remove their potentially contaminated jumpsuit at the back end of the room before taking the decontaminated rack out the back door. MWthe?baek-WSHE and ARE supported a proposal for plastic a?tEMOms to be him the? would have provided little additional containment and-while pose-creating additionalsigni?cant space restrictions in the return hallway. ARE staff have instead chosen to wear their respiratory protection while in the back hallway. milk-12 2E2aih. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Meeohan, Sent: - - I 012 2:11 PM To: (CDCIOIDNCEZID Powell Nathaniel Henderson, geared? -- I I Probst, Paul E. Monroe, Steve (CDCIOIDINCEZID) lilo? . . Subject: Second draft of air?ow issue letter airflow reversal issue. docx . Paul J. Meechan, Director, Of?ce of Safety, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, F-OS Atlanta, GA 30333 tel: 404-639-3147 fax: 404-639-0883 I 32:11 that: :Jff?'lp?ginn?} an-EMaamw Peep?: Prnotlmei?lqnet Procedings at C: 2B2aih,? [bliS' 42 2523Ih} ibiiSHE 2B2aih: 42 US C: 262mb;- US 0 262th, .. iblI13142 2B2aih. . .. . .. Date of Incident: February 15, 2012 . . . Location: Vivariuni I bivarium are designed to contain air within the rooms through. directional air flow. I This is required by the edition of "Biosafety in facilities and is enforced by Select Agent Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories" fo regulations. The precise wording for the current version 252mm Present at initial eventi I Ibli3l'42 us 0. State . stat?e.i?92 incident: The viewers were in the "clean" corridor, viewing mum: use. 252aini '?1'733342 a 25230?? While viewing prairie dogs heldi I 2 [Eeli?i?gg . Ivvith greater force than designed, sending a small "puff" of air out through the viewing window and into the face of the DSAT visitor. Initial responders: this I Initial response: The prairie dogs were convalescing after an experiment with .. I. They were also the first animals housed in the room after the room had been decontaminated earlier in the year. The evaluation by DSHE was that although the air reversal should not have occurred, there was no risk to those at the door during the incident. All compliance parties involved determined no exposure occurred and thus it- did not trigger the requirement that exposures be reported to DSAT. The closure issue was explained to Dr. Allison Williams in ARE. A call was made to BFO to have the doors in the suite examined and defective door closers were adjusted within days. ibiiaizi2 Subsequent response: A meeting was recommended by Dr. Nate Powell and was attended by members of the of?ce, OSHE, BFO, and ARB. The incident was discussed and the follow up actions were provided. It was made clear that although the incident should not have happened and repairs have been made, the personnel at the door were never at risk. Written response: Bill Howard (OSHE) provided a written response to both Dr. Powell and and that has been given to Ms. Dixon. Ms. Dixon is meeting with Dr. Powell on 10 April to discuss her concerns. The other CDC compliance organizations (R0, DSHE) are willing to meet with her and Dr. Powell at their convenience. Additional information: 1. All Building Select Agent animal suites have been tested to ensure compliance with the BMBL requirements. The data have been shared with DSAT, as required by DSAT. 2. The current design of the animal facility doesnot have an anteroom at the back ofthe animal room. Workers leaving the animal room to the back corridor need to spray decontaminate any animal racks being removed for cleaning, and then remove their potentially contaminated jumpsuit at the back end of the room before taking the decontaminated rack out the back door. There is no anteroom on the back ofthe suite. OSHE and ARB supported a proposal for plastic anterooms to be constructed, but they provide little additional containment and pose additional space restrictions in the return hallway. ARE staff have instead chosen to wear their respiratory protection while in the back hallway. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH Subject: LEE-mien; Start: End: Show Time As: Recurrence: Meeting Status: Organizer: . "Ed Attendees: Optional Attendees: Tue 4!10f20121:00 PM Tue 4f10i20121z30 PM Tentative (none) Not yet responded Meeohan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) Powell, . - Probet, Paul E. (coerce Airflow reverse! issue .decx I Last digit is 9. not 8 forthe phone number, Nathaniel Henderson, Monroe, Steve (CDCIDI emolm Date of Incident: Februarv 16X, 2012 Location: Vivarium, ii USE. 262W ivivarium are designed to contain air within the rooms I LIS I This is required by the 5?1 edition of "Biosafetv in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories" (BMBL) forDaci-lit-ies-and is regulations. The precise wording'forthe current version of the BMBL is 252aln: US Ci 252mm LLS I: g. - - . 252arh: Present at Inltlal event: m5, Incident: The viewers were in the "cleano corridor, viewing I Lagrange?? may?: I iWhile viewing prairie dogs held withinl page [nil-3. 42 [?lmed I 262aln: 5.1 5 95 . out through the viewing window and into the face of the DSAT visitor. - -- Iwith greater force than designed, sending a small ?puff? of air Iona; Initial responders: i us 3 Elig?ll? Initial response: The prairie dogs were convalescing after an experiment with "The'a??i'r?'als insight: . . The evaluation by OSHE was that although the air reversal should not have occurred, there was no risk to those at the door during the incident. All compliance parties involved no exposure occurred and it did not trigger the requirement that exposures be reported to DSAT. This was explained to Dr. Allison Williams in ARE. A call was made to BFO to have the doors in the suite examined and defective door closers were adjusted within days. Subsequent response: A meeting was recommended by Dr. Nate Powell and was attended by members of the of?ce, OSHE, BFO, and ARB. The incident was discussed and the follow up actions were provided. It was made clear that although the incident should not have happened and repairs have been made, the personnel at the door were never at risk. Written response: Bill Howard provided a written response to both Dr. Powell and 2B2alh= .. .. - LL30 262mm- Al'lSelect Agent animal suites have been tested to ensure compliance with the BMBL requirements. The data have been shared with DSAT, as required by DSAT. From: 2523??: (CDCTOIDINCEZID) Sent: Tuesda Aril 10, 2012 AM To; Meeohan, Paul J. (CDCTOCCIDIOSHE) Cc: Berger, Sherri Henderson, Joseph (CDCTOCOOIOSEP): Howard, William {Bill} Probst, Paul E. (CDCFOCOOIBFOE Powell. Nathaniel Subject: RE: Request for DSAT Training All, This is an extremely unfortunate decision onart. 1 have sent an Email to Dr. Nathaniel Powell regarding this communication to express my concerns. Mathe, Chester From: Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 5:55 PM To: Meechan, Paul J. [Dr?s?i?US-C-W?aihi (CDCIOIDINCEZIDJ Co: Berger, Sherri Henderson, Joseph (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Subject: Re: Request for DSAT Training I will be glad to update you in the morning. I can promise you that this was thoroughly investigated by OSHE with assistance from program, BFO, SA and ARB. Thanks Pat . From: Meechan, Paul J. Sent: Monda Aril 09, 2012 04:54 PM . . (Encrocoorosas) Henderson, Joseph Subject: FW: Request for DSAT Training Pat and Tony- First We heard of this. Can I get some background info on what happened? I'm sure senior management is going to want to know what happened and how we?re dealing with this. Thanks Paul $523?? Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 4:47 PM To: Howard, William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Meechan, Paul J. Black, Carolyn Holmes, David Frazier, Rodrick (CD Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOO BFO Cc: m?P" Martin, Diane (coqocoo/OSHE) Subject: Fw: Request for DSAT Training - All, Please see below from mg, ,2 E, 2523?, :1 262mb} - 3} 42 US L3. From: inn-Er Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 10:49 AM To: Powell, Nathaniel Cc: Isl-'5? KGB-CID PH more use. a 262am~ Subject: Request for DSAT Training Dr Powell Following our conversation from this morning; ?rst I want to thank you for your support. We are trying to schedule a training session for the last week of April, 2012 for DSAT FTEs (5 participants). I am waiting to hear back frorri onerous: ?2E2alni to decide on an exact date. To answer your question: the requirements to 2 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probs?g Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday April 09. 2012 5:32 PM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Request for DSAT Training FYI Correspondence. Thanks. Paul Probst . -i - 5- Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 4:47 PM I To: Howard, William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Meechan, Paul J. Black, Carolyn Holmes, David Frazier, Rodrick (CDC OSELS Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOO BFO Cc: mil?6: slams-C-Wamr- (coo/ocoofoSHE) Subject: Fw: Request for DSAT Training All, USE Inuit-12 Ions: From:l ?lit? I, I lib'i?'x Sent: Honda Ari! 09, 2012 10:49 AM To: (cocrommcezm) Cc: h, mire? Subject: Request for DSAT Training CEZID) rhllEhi-ii US Cl Dr Powell Following our conversation from this morning; first i want to thank you for your support. We are trying to schedule a training session for the last week of April, 2012 for DSAT FTEs (5 participants]. I am waiting to hear back USO-mien: Ito decide on an exact date. To answer your question: the requirements to enter th it"sbiilaglgm last time were TB test and proof of program] respiratory ?t test. Again thank you for your support. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: U-S-C- 5? 2523i? Sent: onday, April 09, 2012 4:47 PM . To: Howard, William (Bill) Powell, Nathaniel Meeohan, Paul J. Black, Carolyn Holmes, David Frazier, Rodrick Bowen, Ken L. Probet, Paul E. Cc: (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) . Subject: Fw: Request for DSAT Training All, Please see below froml 'b?rl? USE Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 10:49 AM CEZID) Cc ?33?5" Subject: Request for DSAT Training SE. 2523mm Dr Powell Following our conversation from this morning; first I want to thank you for your support. We are trying to schedule a training session {or the last week of April, 2012 for DSAT FTEs (5 participants]. i am waiting to hear back from "35?3" decide on an exact date. To answer your question: the requirements to I'tlilq' 42 enter th c? 252 ast time were TB test andproof of program)( respiratory ?t test. Again thank you for your support. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Browning. Daniel A. (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Sent: Tuesday, August 2012 1:23 PM To: Maths, Chester Subject: FW: Doors in th Iiot Compliant with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Fire Code 1 of2 From: Browning, Daniel A. Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:38 PM To: Rogers, Barbara A. (CDCJODIOADP) Co: Browning, Daniel A. Henderson, Joseph Subject: FW: Doors in thel Not Compliant with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Fire Code 1 of 2 Barbara, There shouldn?t be any issues with this group. Dan From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:45 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Browning, Daniel A. (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George (CDCKOCOOIBFD) Subject: Doors in thel we was Not Compliant with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Fire Code [U'lsJ '43 US 5 ItRetliyariurn RE: Vivarium RE: Building RE: 35237.13. 262m Blocli r. IRE: Results of Door Egress Egress Egress Issues Level Exhaust Level, Testing EM - . W. 6 RE: Results of Door Fw: Results of ale ate Egress RE: Building RE: Building RE: Building Fw: Building Testing Door Testing (Vivarium and Egress Issues Egress Issues Egress Issues Egress Issues RE: Building RE: Building Egress Issues Egress Issues at- George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O?ice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: Atlanta, GA 30333 O?ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 494.59?.2599 Flame mmz'a?ar the mmz'm?manr {ig?re prirz?ig Maths. Chester From: Chandler. George Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 12:10 PM To: Raymond, Probst, Paul E. Meechan. Paul J. Williams, Jeffery Bowen. Ken L. to: at. Subject: Re: :ng Vivarium Egress George - Jeff must approve the ?nal based on his role as AHJ and for consistency with our previous analysis. The response below does not appear to me to be consistent with previous discussions and, furthermore, begs the question of why the original Consultant's report was not questioned if we do not concur with its findings. Thanks! G.- n.1? ..-.. From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCUOXBFD) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:53 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffer Bowen, Ken L. Jue, Bruce R. Koob, Stephen H. Walpole, Kenneth K. Bel?aiver, Craig Wigington, Darryl (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Chandler, Subject: FW: Vivarium Egress This is FMEO response to BFO DD and OSHE to address the OSHA complaint of violation of'the NFPA 101 Life safety code and a testing scenario for the Vivarium area HVAC system, ?re alarm system and door opening farce Under AHU supply fan failure. Paui Probst's email below dated 1l20l2011 references the oommissioning'report dated 12l28l2010. In that report it stated; "the force required to open. doors during supply fen failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15lbi. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lbtJ.? As Paul stated in- his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.3.9.1 it states; ?Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization sh all use and approved en gineered-system with a design pressure di?erence across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklered buildings or .1 in water column in nonsprinklered-buildiags, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure dhj?eren ce under likely conditions of stock ejj?ect or wind. The pressure dr??erence across doors shall exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by a force of 30leC in accordance with 7.2.14.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress sh all not exceed to release the latch, 30lbf to set the door in motion, and 15lbf to open the'door to the minimum 1 required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without ciosure shaii not exceed Sibf. These forces shaii be oppiied to the iotch stile."r "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing buiiding sh not exceed SDibf appiied to the iatch stiie? Translations, it takes 15 bfto engage the latch on the door, pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, (SUibf in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12/28/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation nadir-12 LIE: L3 EBEEIITI- 5.20iW?A?dg2 Fm, 2iW?di totoi door-openin force, it), Fag =force to overcome door cioser; ibf door area, ft A door area, dp pressure difference across door, in. of water d= distance from doorknob to edge oficnob side of door, ft Under these measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. However, ifthe Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure more If we adjust the 2 door closure force on these doors to under 51be these door will be in compliance during a suppr fan failure condition. USE 252mm FMEO has developed the following test scenarios to con?rm the following; . I Current operating condition under system failure and ?re alarms in the build. I musk-:2 use. 5 2'52au;h;- . . - Adjust door closure force onl and test during supply fan failure and alarm conditions. Testing Scenario I Total door opening force under system failure and fire alarm in the building HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm General building Fire alarm Supply,r fan failure Stairwell pressure fans {Everything but a pull station starts the fans) i Freeze protections. Fire alarm system Scenario Verify Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by the fire alarm system. States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST STAIRWELL FANS DOORS OK Normal Normal ON ON OFF YES AHU dual Fan Failure Safety Interlock) Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLU DES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. Doors that will be tested are listed as follows; Eli- These doors were identi?ed during the original construction as egress doors and were tested to meat NFPA 101 and ADA requirement. Gearge K. Raymond Dainty Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O?icc Centarsfor Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Of?ce: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.59?.2599 5.45 Pirate rancher rbe sma'marasnr entire printing Ibis a-raaif From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCUOIBFD) Subject: FW:ivarium Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, Januaryr 20, 2011 8:18 AM To: Williams Jeffery SubjectVilrarium Egress Jef? This is following Up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent?s report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 1131? and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greaterthan three times that amount (45 lbf}. The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 12.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lbf. Since the project modi?ed air 4 ?ow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. Cir Report 2. NFPA 101 ?2000 3. ASHRAE Formula [1313 '42 3.1.. - CDC 9523"? Repoerdf>> 101 - 2000.pdf>> seashrae formuiapdf? For ease of reference, this is what the (3x report states: ?The Commissioning (Ox) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure presented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader, it was necessary to pushfpull the door inwardfoutward before turning the handle and opening the door.? Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: (CDCIOCOOMSHE) Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 2:39 PM To: Probst. Paul E. (CDPowell, Steven L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO Powell, Nathaniel the Us a teem? Howard, William {Bill} (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Subject: Vivarium OSHE would like to do a walk-through of the vivarium on Monday, April 30?? at 8:30 am. The purpose of this walk-through is to re?verify that the animal room doors are continuing to close properly. We will need someone from ARB with aooess to enter all the labs while OSHE observes. We would also like appropriate FSE personnel to be present so that immediate on site adjustments of the doors can be made if necessary. Thanks El Mathe. Cheater new-42 us Frorn: Sent: 2012 4:20 PM To: '3 00: Holmes. David Frazier Rodrick new: Subject: CDC Resonse to DSAT Request of April 13, 2012 RE: Incidents During Visitor Tours of the ivarium Good Afternoo Per your e-mail and attached letter of April 13, 2012, please ?nd attached provide additional information regarding incidents that occurred in the and February 16, 2012. (Lower CDC Response to .. DEM Request the CDC response to your request for me to . Vivarium during tours on Respectfully submitted, mun-4e us r3 gzeemm set/l Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) DEPARTHENT OF HEALTH 3- HUMAN SERVICES To: [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 2E2a[h} Division of Select Agents and Toxins Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Cli?on Road NE, Mail Stop A46 Atlanta, GA 30333 FROM: David Holmes, Director, Division of Laboratory Policy and Practice DATE: Apt-i120, 2012 SUBJECT: incidents During Visitor Tours of the lbll?gga?-C? Vivarium The purpose of this correspondence is to provide information as requested in the DSAT letter of April 13, 2012, to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-Robe U-S-C- 5 2523i?) US .C. 252801) I As way of background 1 would like to describe important actions taken related to this event. 1' .lmkIh-z On February 16, 2012 of DSAT sent an email to OSHE and ARE expressing concerns about the event in question. This email did not include anyone from the SA Compliance O?ice. OSHE investigated the circumstances and determined that there had been no potential occUpationa] exposure. As a result of this determination there was no official noti?cation sent to DSAT. As a result of the email sent on April 9, 2012, additional reviews of this incident were conducted and summary documents of the ?ndings were prepared. I shared these documents with Dr. Robbin Weyant on April 12. 2012, and he indicated that DSAT would be opening an investigation. On April 13. 2012 we received the email from by April 20, 2012. On April 17, mam} sent an email to the Form 3 email address requesting additional information related to the event as DSAT staff was present at the time of the incident. As of Friday April 20, 2012, we have not heard back. Ifthis incident is determined by DSAT to be reportable, we respect?illy submit we will need this information before we can proceed further in our investigation. U.S.C. 252301} requesting the attached response vial-n If you require anything further from us please do not hesitate to contact me or I Resaectaluy submitted; mama David Holmes,- Di're'ctoi" Divisionof Laboratory Policy-and Prac?ce Laboratory Science Policy and PraotioeProgram Of?ce Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services Centers .for Disease Control and Prevention 1500 Cli?on' Road,.NE, Mail Stop 13-56 Allanta, GA 30333 Telephone: 404?493-6405; FAX: 484-498-6409 E-maii: new. NEH-31 In \hdmin?tm?Em . do: The following information is provided in response to your request of April 13, 2012, RE: Incidents During Visitor'l'ours of the Building ivariurn 1} 2} Please find attached a Form 3 along with an executive summary (narrative) of events including a timeline of what occurred. It should be noted that a risk assessment conducted by the entity Of?ce of Safet Health and Environment, th and the Program registered for use of [Diem use W523 did not indicate that a Form 3 reportable event occurred during the tours based on the fact that Room had been decontaminated for annual facility maintenance activities and no work with virus occurred in the room between the room decontamination and the tour dates of February 14 and February 16, 2012. In accordance with the attached DSAT HVAC veri?cation guidance {fourth attachment below}, a transient excursion does not necessarily mean that a reversal of overall airflow for the containment block has occurred. It should also be noted that the prairie dogs that were housed in Room =12 LLSC. 262mb.- time of the air puff incident on February 16, 2012, were naive prairie dogs that were transferred . . ?2o2auln into the room in January 2012 (where ARB maintains naive animals) as per the attached log record. . Airflow Issue small 3?Wariurn Airflo. .. centers TLR Latter Narrative Verification doc Naive Animal Log??iZ?Z?lEde ARB has provided information that the following locations were entered by the first group of visitors on February 14, 2012. Response: A floor plan of the vivarium is attached. I recommend contacting to complete details on route taken on February 14, 2012 tour. The information provided below related to ro. entry was obtained by ARE staff after reviewing the Personnel Log in Sheet for .42 {name Ll 5C 6 l'll'Ell'iUl'l'IJEllyr I'm" I Log out.usage_APFt2012 _Sheets_23NOV11-3l 3} ARE has provided the following information regarding work activities being performed in each of varium rooms on February 14, 2012 and February 16, 2012. The-registered locations in the i Vivarium are highlighted in yellow below. In Response: The following work activities were performed in the February14??2012 and February 16, 2012: -. (3. 300m - 4mm assess aHi.maisma..i.ataiasdlambs 0 Room USE. 252mm a. The room was empty. The room was not hot. I The deaths suits. RooUhnassigned) not hot. 9 ?Room mas-442115 swam: I maintainer. an thersum-ihssuits washes Room - - - room was empty. The suite was not hot. 0 Room I The room was empty. The suite was not hot. 6.5 Necreaarteom rd?: 4} ARB has provided that requirements to enter into the Vivarium containment are as follows. Response: Entry requirements are dependent on the location of the study within the vivarium. The following information is provided: 1.1, a LTwek sun.- PAPR aliases: inner shoe covers, outersh?oecovers, 'fac'ilityshoes so. 3 252mm le- When the suites are ?entry, Tyvek suit, with head cover bonnet, outer shoe cover, inner-shoecover, eighties a . $351.13? L's Ci Tyvek suit, FAPR with head cover bonnet, inner shoe covers, outer shoe covers, facility shoes I Note: Rooms do not currently contain animals. Specific entry requirements will be protocol driven I Clean corridor? No PPE is required in this area 5) The procedure for preventing entry of unvaccinated individuals into areas where vaccination is required as provided by ARB is as follows. USE: ?2?ialhi c. Training 6} ARB has provided that the last time active work with infectious agents was performed in procedure room sas prior to the tour by the second group as follows. Response: The last active work inwas holding of naive prairie dogs beginning Janua of 2012 as per the attached log. Since the most recent decontamination in December 2D11fJanuarv 2012, no infectious work has taken place in 311376.? Nai?ve prairie dogs were moved into the 2.32 area in Januaryr 2012 but no infectious work occurred with these animals from the decontamination to the period oftbe tours. Naive Log-U42 02012. ARB has provided details on the used throughout the containment block and including any animals housed at thetirne in room . as follows. Response: throughout thel following: :12 U5 CI. 2E2al?h' I consists of the - Individual ventilated caging supply and HEPA exhaust) This type of caging is used to house prairie dogs I Duoflo units with metal cages placed inside (HEPA ?ltered exhaust} This type of caging is used to house ferrets - Tub holding containers (This type of caging is used to house groups of rairie dogs) Naive prairie dogs were maintained in this type of housing in Room on February 16, 2012. 3} BFO has provided the following response to the request for pressure trending data for each of the rooms in the vivariu .- during the time of the second group?s visit on Fel'i'ruari,r 15, 2012. Additionally, Dr. Paul Meechan, Director, OSHE, has conveyed that there is no requirement to maintain trending data for pressure differential readings. Pressure differentials are not airflows and there is no requirement that they be continuously monitored and recorded. 'lfivarium Door Pressure Page 2449 M342 use. 252mm Page 2450 use. 252mm urns262mb;- IbilSlZ-?l-Z US 262mb: 262th: see no:I23l:42 0.5.0 252a[h'- us 0 252mm US 0 262alhj; Ibli32242 US 0 252m,- stood outside the door?ofin the clean corridor, - inside opened the door to the room. As this door closed, a very noticeable puff of air could be illwq- 951? La: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Atlanta. GA 30333 In the Vivarium April 13, 2012 escorted"" On February 14, 2012 between -11:30 am, DSAT inspector space. Pa rtlcipa n-ts-e n-tered- the area wearing PAPRs and showered out upon exit. (in February 16, 2012 between 8 -11:30 am, escorted a second group to the viva rium they option and did not wear PAPRs. According to es :ort The secondegrottp was given the option of touring the clean corridor outSIde ES felt coming through the slit in the window out into the clean corridor. An incident report was provided to DSAT from CDC. This report states that prairie dogs were -- -- - Iafter an experiment with "The BM that all persons working in or entering laboratory or animal care areas where activities with BL states the vivarium included individuals who had not been vaccinated -- are being conducted should have evidence of satisfactory vaccination. The two groups of visitors to In order to determine whether the visitors on February 15 and 15, 2012 were exposed to a select agent, please provide the following information by COB on April 20, 2012: I Please submit a completed Form 3 along with an executive summary (narrative) of events including timeline of what occurred. - Please provide details on which rooms within the containment block were entered by the first group of visitors. In Please provide information on the work activities being performed in all of the vivarium rooms during the time intervals of the visit. a What is/are the requirement(sl for entry into the containment block? 0 Explain the procedure for preventing entry of unvaccinated individuals into areas where vaccination is required. 0 Please con?rm the last time that active work was performed in procedure rooriorto- the tour by the second group. - Provide details on the animal housing used throughout the containment block and including any animals housed at the time in animal holding roo -- - .buEic-miles-42 use - .. LIE use area. In. runs- 42 us ca .. . IlZI'il3llI-12 US . Mimi-:42 US I15 - Previous HVAC verification test results provided to DSAT for the 262m" vivanum space were qualitative and lacked room differentiai pressure trending data. Please provide pressure trending data for each of the rooms in the vivarium containment block during the time of the second group?s visit on February 16, 2012. Ith:r2::42 I If you have questions concerning this correspondence, please contact via the Form 3 mailbox at: form3@cdc.gov M3142 us a On all correspondences regarding this TLR investigation, please be sure to include 262m?? IUHEHE Thank you in advance for your cooperation and collaboration in this critical investigation. Sincerelv. IlJ?nfSut?rE LLE C5 DSAT Vision: To be the preeminent rcsottrcefor tt'te .snjeg' and security nfbioiogicat agents and toxins. This document is intended for the excinsive use ofthe rectpientf?s) named above. it may contain sensitive that is protected. priviteged. or confidentint. and it snotth not be disseminated distributed. or copied to persons not ntnitortect to receive such infonnation {tyne are not the intended restpientt?s), may dissentimmon. distribution. or copying is stricti} prohibited. {I'm think you have received this document in error. please non?t the sender immediatebf and destroy the ort'gt'mt. Thank you. Summary of Events: Incidents During Visitor Tours of the '39-?33 Date of Incident: February 15, 2012 uses 2-623[h' Location: Vivarium, @3142 US C3 2?2 i'li . . . .. . Background:i i 3' irlvarlum are designed to contain Infectious agents $133242 LI sc. sun? nun-luna- un- ?a I the external corridors, providing continuous airflow into the rooms. This is required by the 5th edition of "Biosafetv in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories? fofacilities and is enforced by Select Agent regulations. The precise wording for the current version of the BMBL is: LLS I3. 262m: Present at initial event: mile: Incident: On February 16, 2012, the tour members were in the ?clean? corridor gig-gs viewing animal holding areas through the procedure room door of Room - While viewing prairie dogs held within the holding room, a door between the holding room and procedure room closed with greater force than required, sending a small ?puff? of air out through the slotted window and into the face of the visitor. Date of Initial Response; February 2012 Initial responders: I we nuary lbii3jid2 - .5 cs area in January 2012 but no infectious work has occurred with these animals. The evaluation by DSHE was that although the puff of air out through the-slotted window should not have occurred, there was no exposure risk to those at the door during the incident. All compliance parties involved determined no exposure occurred and thus it did not trigger the requirement that exposures be reported to the RD and to DSAT. The closure issue was explained to Dr. Allison Williams in ARE. A call was made to BFD to have the doors in the suite examined and the door closures were adjusted. IJS 0 262mb} US 0 IbiiEi: :12 US Ctr} 26231?: P.o.well..(ARB.} and was} 42 252mb: - toga, :12 US 2E2a-h?. -- Air - . -. gigg- 252aih; .. - Date of Con?rmation That Door Closure Adjustments Were Completed: February 24, 2012 FW Vivarium door adjust rnents. nag Date of Notification to February 21, 2012 IE noti?cation: Dr. Allison Williams sent notification of the air?ow incident to the on February 21, 2012, by forwarding email of February 16 to her. The assigned follow-up action to team members on February 21, 2012, and sent an e-mail tolib'i'?1ll ME: ll 'bil?i Ion February 24, 2012, to veri whether or not OSHE deemed the air?ow incident of February 16, 2012 a reportable incident to DSAT. conveyed that he did not view the puff of air from Room-into-the clean..- corridor as an airflow reversal {see DSAT guidance on HVAC veri?cation in facilitiesl. MC 5 Additionally, naive prairie dogs were housed in the room which meant no select agent was present Subsequently, no report was submitted to DSAT of the occurrence. ?w . . IL verifctin u. .. Meeting With ARE, Held: February 27, 2012 Subsequent response: A meeting was recommended by Dr. Nate Powell and was attended by members of theoffice, osne, aro, actions were provided. It was made clear that although the incident should not have happened and door adjustments have been made, the personnel at the door were never at risk. and ARB. The incident was discussed and the follow up Follow-up actions included a request lthat she be provided with a written statement regarding safety during air flow incidents that she could have available to share with individuals. that. might be. in-the Vivarium at the time of such incidents. OSHE developed and provided a written statement regarding safety during events such as the puff of air noted from Room *3 Ion February 23, A copy Df the written statement is attached. '5 Charade April 9, 2012 LL30 ?2E2aihi responding to request from DSAT, for a training tour the - idivarium for some time during the iast week of April 2012. April 13, 2012 [Elreceiued letter from DSAT, RE: Incidents During Visitor Tours of th . '5 Vivarium with a request to submit a completed Form 3 along with additional information by C08 on April 20, 2012. It should be noted that the IE sent a request to the form3@cdc.gov mailbox requesting information to assist in generating the response by April 20, 2012. The speci?cally requested a list of tour members contact information to include telephone numbers and e?mail addresses to aid in conducting tour participant interviews; clari?cation as to whether the request from BEAT was intended to reference one or multiple incident; as well as clarification as to whether or not any of the tour participants were seen in the CDC Occupational Health Clinic or sought medical follow-up elsewhere as a result a result of the incident. As of Friday, April 20, 2012, DSAT has not responded to the request. [biiS'ri-iE ?2523Ijh Verification 2E2aih: 42 USE. 232th SE . 2EZaih: xi 3 m? can. .533 3 5.9 (Sauna 3. 3.5.. in?; :12 US Cl ?2 3281 15 If there are any questions about this policy, please contact the CDC DSAT Facility l. or the I Ian3: Ior I Iml'?r aa?iirama @953 dl'l?'?'li Bull Ellyn-21? china-1m tun'f?i'??W??l RECORD OF ANIWLS Mia-42 ?f?c?i . EXT. SPECEES Frame Dag Mia-:42 us 0 2523'?? -- [mam usc - 252am- ORGANIZATT .. I GROUPIE INO. I 2523' I I. HO. . 2312.3] .. I -- w~ . CLINECAL RECORD Am; ?lls EFme durum 3:135 '03; 1:1. named .ms 1 99-1.. EDI: Adobe mm 5.9. I Eo-l! Flip]. CLINECAL RECORD OF REM 15k RKS DATE @3142 use. 252mm ?11? LL- USE. 5: 252mm EXT. ENVESTIGATO use 252all1 -. US 0 252mm GROUPIID NO. L'Ef?j . .. .. ROOM CLWCAL RECORD OF ENIMALS {Gas $2515}, Realism: Jun: 1994, CDC Am hash-1'. 970., Eia?mn'lc Van-Ir: .1. Jun-cry 1039 u- RECORD AWLS mg DATE REMARKS Jill (31524201 2 . . ., {if jig 2?2a'2?2aih; . .. . ROOM NO- CLENICAL RECGRD GF ANIBMLS (me. 50:35; ?edged 15194411"): mint-a Lard-.1! 9.9, Ram-5.1a: ?Jrnm. Page 2463 use. 252mm ??yv?m Gag 5wx1 gag .sa 52' gm 291:!" My Wm HIS 5:2: 533qu Egg ?612! f3?! {5313' 1/1 .5391 {294. A. {7.4 921.5 0.0.27} 341:5 895% J?sicl ma?a {[119393? - Liih LN 0a.: 65; (3 f? 22w 5253:! .53: $5.50 gacn 10:? 53.3951 5?ch mn,? mil! .u mu w?l?mi? :12 o: (3115 A 531-}! ?3.2/5 0g: 505:5? VI Siam 011:3; 5; WSW-?fty; A ff .1110 HENLL EINLL 'I-Jlim'culezgz 15 r: Zt-?l {I'm mam? MFR 02 In; Hot IJc'r. Mqi 0i Isa at 325057.?; 111. r?lw dag 'ie' '4 19M ?fez/H 5?5 x? :y?iim Mwa g} {92' I 52 ii xi?tdxx. Way/n 1-1137; 1% HM 1E Wm Wm Ud?iihld SWUUH SWVN ul U5ES humans/x i . LIJEEQZ '13 5 Fl axial]! wens 501 [summed .Wgusa?TE NAME ?9.335335321253550 23$ commems Frill? x/ ?14255 Me: Sass iocqq-Fewdi 01:36 In 106mb. 5i];le 103+ Vb? Dion 1' [9'55 fi/z/g/ L230 MB Iii-H \x . Wm 9:331 Fmew Eiim ?m tz?lozht 10:30 ignog?zam?g ll ?0 13g {?373 thu? 125102)}; x/ [0250 11190 PDs we, r1121? v? v? v? 130?: 2'5 M15 milih Ll? Lilgni?? \elm A ?i'qmm? wigm 3?41 39190 Film 915;? ?Fmim gig!? 1/ gun {$25 I a #if? l1 ?lit: ms 191m $2 Rb Bio: 13% Pk; C'pr whaJn v? #5 few @2le I I L309 v? ms 115 Person nel Log Sheet Vivarium Sign In Ib'r3i'12 U5 262%; (ms. 42 [tn-(3 mm: g. Penman 9] Log Sheet mug-d2 252mm Vivarium Sign In TIME TIME IN 5? COMMENTS 7?33? SH I 3 ?sh; 1% 5H 1% 10:3 my? 4' 1'3 Cw? ?2:1 13; ~41 91.5%! of: MW 3?3?1 5 Mi. is. el Log Sheet ?yr? :12 2'32 ivarium Sign In 1 ROOMS ENTERED TIME TIME - (LEI .. us ?2a2alm OUT COMMENTS if? ?019 mm W21 '43? 153241 gig?ma (3:53 {3,1th 5mm. If? not; .fiIl lit {113m - We W2 1'3 "3:99:13 \H?jlw H.593 243,19 PM) 11min; DEW Iowa? M15 HS 110 WP 0/ uni-1m - gllg?a 1/ . . mm - Janna . .. - if} . 1r i 5 do ?143 Jll?iz 912,0 vim-a flag/g, - M?de {0:5 42,: liming, 01m; 1305? 0 my; {No fuss." Irma, 91.2.7 $33 FWD 102313 [142?? Wm, 6111,51 Hrs-m W: man; 3h 033.3 la?pr 3K6 Via-n9 $3.39: ?3ng {ml/u x/ v" gag: lavas; [1.21% r; rig?~11 . Erif?sm x. 351 I 933M 31 MR Personnel Log Sheet. 33511:? I Imam!? Sign In TIME TIME L/r 252: 3:210 {Dic??jir I69 Balms w: 5:55} f2? P. I ?31243 wig? M42 .. damn welf- [ilj?'i? M. VI f4? 1mm?; i mm 5231 Hm - Him who gm 74:29 {532% Earmgmimg 1&2;ch yr v? y- [200 2.15:5 ?3433 f?'rc?ji ARE. 3-1301; 101.32? V-w 4:3" La,? H4343 f- I [Brim Wm {Jim} 3:19am glixg?m t/ - @2139, way?r- U'fwflil. 1' _1 'lgul'f? 1/ . Mn Pb {Mg In?; v? ?nest: mg? M5?)er [9335? 1W Fwd;- ?3520 .. 2,325?ri 313??: {Vivi-W ?it/cw; {33.27% @y??m_n3}42 Personnel Log Sheet IVivarium Sign In I El 11 was mzr3::42 use. zezam: TIME IN OUT COMMENTS Hi1; w/ AR) 0g), fill/{i y, [?g?'W'FmLt 1:31:39 "115)? '19- 710;?? TSU PM: 2117:,le 1/ . its-:33? 321.731.151 Qis??fm?i?rm v? QWTQ A Vim-la v? 0/1; DBL. {?lth? 9.33m {mm 394% was 35?! g9. 9.10m 591mm, 5m 7% ?7:th ma WE filo?), 5111531? iftes"? 9% 25m W'se; rem- EIMQ #:13191- 5m? 9mm ?ii-m ml?: g. 9939?. MS 1W3 raging x/ J. . tar-in ff?b 1L, ?135114 3P7 92.27% 3? WW ?ms ?it-[I '3 c- Ag.in ?f L41. . 9km; EUQUQ 313.2% ?ea-Wes? am My, a/ {Dr-1:9 ?947$ Em 2-19, {am 3ng Pants :31; 9?35: 1 9,4911; ?1"131. Iain O?leh?l Sf I ?ago 12105? Fauvaf?js el Log Sheet ivarium Sign In ?rm 3:345 wy/MB Hli?hmm??ma Fink 31.1543? am m) 2-64} 55.5% Mb REL: Ciflm grail! H351 vaaP' ?air/1:1. '31 :10ch Liam]: Rf-I?dz sit-?40 119% Eggs :lH-lil 720%: 8:37 Emu; tbs/?P ?1111 5? Wham 1015153]? miz QWHH ?giillm/J'L H336 3914/11 1/ 45m ska-31.- diva/5?? Vl/Mjn x/ (137? 1:233 2mm 0f I IMO 3-1442 55% [99.2515 . 7:519 Wm ?ns-n ?imam hi? mm 1' ?PZWm-v?nr?b 9475/? Alto-13L Pr QJICM 3% r013cfw??q I . Mb? 1/ 951: 2410?42 9/ 0333- 1/ 6952 M6 'le?'L 14 05% 24W C5153 [mm-42 2623M: [Ul[3!242 Ll ELC. i' Personnel Log Sheet ROOMS ENTERED LL50. 252mm: IN TIME TIME OUT COMMENTS Personn 9! Log Sheet Vivarium Sign In . 1 ?d . ,I?brt3::a12 L. '252all1; LLS 252mm Il?Iil?, ?5135313715?? . 3'3? COMMENTS 1/ "7117991 4'57 19M) 1959mm l/ 71:21 {3:93 v" Macy my {diff?Prim (I 1 133% ?675 MUS 123357? Liz/5? 1/ iaj'ssri'amm? 1101 "0 km?) a 01m [3:er Ema-rs . {91371530019 . g~ grog??Kg r/ ?5??194x x/ $31 {353% If 51103 MM MES [1:333 Ll 35415 4% Pox. FD 3:35" '710?4 gim- (xi-CS avg-a of?ng ?g?R /Z=co 252mm. (913'? f1 1- garlf fb'hIE'Z-iE Personnel Log Sheet Nivarium Sign In Ib}l3}'42 U5 262mm {we NAME R?g?ifilsnRI-ED 3?35 COMMENTS El?n PM {1 7.09413 rm War" 9? (77:31? 93531,: .P-e/Wwf? 3/9. [[11 I Gt=Glafrd?fg?m 1/ s/ ?iimia??cm 5m} 1/ x/ 52:1,} qu M115 3/7? Hi $535391- [?31 550.211 ?irin l- v? 7?Wg?gqgf? {m "Hill w/ ?a "rt-0?1) 3-131; 1/ 7:18 'ixl?t?} ME: 319% . M5 54.54} L/c/ {9:74 aim-4% 343- @zzasz?ww" ?h?gx {9&9 jji?mm 31.37 3137M ff 3/ 359.33? 33% ?ll-m 349?131 R, 353% 3:551; ?13; PM) 345mb 1/ 3- 1/ I: 'itimpf?c? 9N) hug-:3, t/ I . 14?15 ?min! :3 x/ I H5: it: Cw. 5:9er mm In ?aid/Y" 3/ 1' riff-1'51 3303:2941 9mgqu fg?nff? Personnel Lo Sheet 42 2523"?; I .. a E. 3E TIME TIME min-31,42 U5 DATE use. 2E23ih': GUT GHQJI 1M [gm M. 5.6.5 ?3 as use. 5 COMMENTS Personnel Log Sheet Il'blt3ii42 U5 I3. [Vivarium Sign In DAT NAME $1 3451?12 Sitting Wile; 1'1 gm "394% 32333 )2 ?S/gnngram; 2mm, amt? @?g?hm f. I 3/2270} i 31522112 63,131; 3413-19 jml-m? 25 3.99949 Ih_il3.242 LI 5 I: 262aul1: lL'Jil?, USC 2523!,11} TIME IN TIME OUT COMMENTS $an ME 1/1/ 20 NO Qt?? We; ,f - ?rmh ul? ?i?'li DIME {0'3 WES E) 1.105% 3?36 mm $6 a: SE 5.0% 1 l/ i 1an, f0: :23: li m, 10310 60391 i229 3-13 9?45 XX 5?13 ?51 12) (?2133' CHM [0 EH 9:3015 Java; nag?? Fayre/H Mm i 7 EMF - ?7.02) I qr Wig? 7:310 u2 USI :3 Fla-energize exhaust system-close disconnects Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears 605 605 systems continuerto to remain ole-energized. 605 x. 605 interlock to disablerenaoie. _The three exhaust systems and AHU follow normal s?tem enable sequances. Exh'au st'systems-are stable. '23-?43: X: . is stable as: us- IbliB: 42 US. Ibit'31-12 US. Inglis-12 IJS US US 1 Exhaust Fan Failure 1 Fall exhaust fan?open essences. B-AS- intimates 'f'an m-ototr status failure. alarms, remotres run command Two-position damper modulates closed. Modulating damper continues to modulate to maintain SP setpoint. loontinues to-operate. Exhaust-fan system-status maintained. AHU continues to operate other exhaust systems continue to operate >4 a 252mm 2 252mm 1 2628013- EF Restart att'er Failure Fla-energize- exhaust fan- ciose disconnect- Acltnowledge alarrnlI alarm clears B05 605 Itollows normal start-up procedures 505 605 Fan motor statusie verified-for both fan's 605 605 r2. qt?J'maa?ucpti are Two-position damper modulates to preset open position 605 605 ModuIating damper continues to modulate'to setpoint' 605 605.. loontinues to operate. 605 sos other exhaust systems continue to operate 605 505 AHU continues to operate 35': 505 'x x- XK-XX ?3 :?2o2alht Exhaust Fan Failure Fail BAS indicates fan mototr statustaiture. alarms, removes run command 605 I?gposition damper modulatesclosed. Modulating damper co ntinues to modulate to setpoint l?nn?nUEE 10 operate. Exhaust tan system status maintained. continues to. operate- m??tocl ala- re :rua?co other-exhaust systems continueto operate er; 5: e- tesue said to be resolved by contractor. Veri?ed resolved by commissioningagent. Ito:I3::42 51:. 5 252mm Pago?w at 13 Functional BAS Graphics Test: Test Parameter Action Verification initial Tali ?ll-Tait In?ll! To? Fi?-Tut Pm Fall 9 Pass Fail "mm: a a IAcknowledoe alarm} alarm clears 605 605 hollows normal start-up procedures 505 505 Fan motor status is verified for both tans 605 505 EF Riestart after I Two-'posrtlon damper modulates to preset open 605 805 4 -aliure Rex-energize exhaust fan- [posmon? WW U53 5 2mm close disconnect a Madmath damper continues to modulate to 605 605 I .. mamtain SP setpolnt - Icontinues to operate. cos 605 (3) other exhaust systems continue to operate 605 5505 wX_ AHU continues to operate ?505 605 8A3 indicates exhaust system status tailors. and a . both tan motor status failures, alarms Modulating bypass damper modulates closed. Two-Position bypass damper closes. M342 5?5th run enable removed'5Y51em 6 Failure Fail exhaust system-open de-eneroizes (straw us 0. 2e2arh} . AHU static pressure declines prior to remaining 9 exhaust systems static pressure. MOW U5 2523i?? AHU lindicate due to system Shutdownl . (t a Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears 605 605 Exhaust System to Systems continue to to remain de?energized. 5335 605 Restart after . Toggle to disabletenable. 6 Failure ?eenarglzegmamt The three exhaust systems and AHU tollow normal 7? system-close disconnects M342 US 262%} system enable sequences. Suppty air system is stable (mm-Ag U53 gagamc - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. I M3342 agent. genes F5 Page 11 of 1a . as}: Test. F?sratnetsr . 3' 3 - ass Grannies" Initial Testi. .. sees tlhitial Test . sees-t: some $3333.42 US 1 U33 ?2?2alhi US us ?2s2ium us: LISC USE -- - - . . . -. .. - - .9355. Fail ?less: if": 93.551. git? lg? 13- I 2~?2mm Btat?tiS?tD3A8 indicates exhau'st'fan failure, alarms, removes run command . Bypass damper modulates closed. Exhaust system tailors static pressure drops below - . setpoin'tl AHU tie-energizes before remaining EX gi?iigan Fa? exhaust systems go into safe egress mode- other exhaust systems begin to-operate in safe egress mode after AHU heads-energized. (2}.other exhaL'Jst Systems and AHU gra - e- indicate operation in safe egress due to .. 5'3? olf. . - Disable exhaust system in text mode. AHU and Disable Sysiem' exhaust systems perform oer failure a Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears - System continue to operate per-safe egress EF-Reslart alter modes- . 2 Failure Rue-energize exhaust fan- 0- Togglele'gellnterlock to disabiefenable; I -. ., close disconnect (3) Exhaust systems and ?t Ll follow norms. d; me -e Exhaust systems are stable )1 .X . Supply air system stabilizes. eats soonest - Graphics indicate loss of communioation with BAS alarms. I - AHU Continues to operate as-a stand alone 3:803:50" Disconnect LAN controller. . Isystem continues to operate. . --eent-rel-panei - d- -- Isyst'em continues to operate. .. . -. a. Icon?nuEs Operate. X. 5252mm nd all three exhaust systems indicate Dt?ine .. status Issue said-to be resotvect by contractor. - Issue veri?ed resolved ?oy? commissioning agent- lbil33142 USE. Page 12 of 1's Functional BAS Graphics Test: Test Parameter Action Veri?cation initial Test HeiTeat initial Tent Hit-Test Pass Fail ?:33 r: Pass Fell 5.33,? Disconnect LAN Graphics indicate loss of communication with BAS control connection to Exhaust _a BAS alarms. 60? 607 (?"3142 ?5 9.?552a?? Isystem continues to operate. HE mchle- continues to operate mag US Icontlnues to operate. F. AHU. and all three exhaust systems indicate Offline )4 WW U5 statu a Acknowledge alarmif alarm clears NA NA NA NA US C. 2?2ath} h. .. I a 3 ?Um 262 Recormeat..mw.?bnnectlon ., Isystem continues to operate 1 at ass oururui in wm'mes t? operate' U5 5 25230? continues to operate. a . *ontinues to operate. 2 a Miami alarm clears NA NA NA NA (straw us 0. 252arh) failure rt Reccmect LAN connection to system continues to operate. (WW ?5 0:525:33'1? esta 3 [system continues to opErate. ?5 I continues to operate. :ontinues to operate. urapnics indicate loss of communication with a BAS alarms. AHU loses run command, contact opens and fan US ll contro?er recognizes loss of status and begins to operate in safe egress 606 606 BAS control . mode. - MSW .. -2f?ggagg?s?ge[Exam . Isystem controller recognizes AHU failure loss loss of status and begins to operate in safe 603 608 us 0. 2?2arhi - - - I system controller recognizes AHU loss of loss of status and begins to operate in sate 606 506 egress mode. AHU, and all three exhaust systems indicate operation in Safe egress mode failure; 806 505? "34' 5253?? - issue said to be resolved by contractor. - issue veri?ed resoirred by commissioning agent. Imm'42 U30 5 2523M IHEV3.xisx EFs Page 13 M18 Functional scene - gas-Test" - [Fail- ?v Graphics indicate loss of communication with .X I BAS alarms. command-J- contaots remain closed, contacts open. and system operates in "emergen cy" mode. System bypass damper modulates to preset . "emergency'lopem position thru pneumatic System mo-p?SlIlGh damper'r?emains in preset open position IbthHE us c. 252m:- 42 us sins-isms:- [tiiE'II-ti 3d . 2523[h: '1 i Ibi-[3t242 US ?2I32allii exhaust system loses run '12: eommand, - 'ontacts'remam - - - .. .. . . 8 contacts open, and system operates in "emergency' mode. . 3A8 control panel System bypass damper modulates to preset 3 929%}? mfoguge?PUwer "emergency?Topem position thru pneumatic PFW. allots .. .. .. . System two-position damper remains in?preset ooen position exhaust system loses run command,. in ten contacts remain closed ar'rd'tan oontinuesto operate in "emer'g ency" mode. System bypass damper modulates to preset ?emerg en cy"{0pen) position thru pneumatic, PRU. AHU controller recognizes Exhaust systems stems failure and rte-energizes. Record time for AHU 608 508 shutdown its. EF controller failure. a ree List systems indicate I I - us cj'g'za?'irii' US I us: 2s2arh; MSW U-S- [b 3:242 USE ?2 325l[h? . SUB-E: ?2623ih: .. sosf?.? - issue said to be resolved by contractor. . 1.1.3.0 252m; ?3 - Essue veri?ed resolved by commissioning agent. In EV3.xis_ saga-14 at 13 . Func_tional BAS Graphics Task Test Parameter Action Veri?cation Initial Test Its-Test initial Test Ftva Pass Fall ?nmm'm': Pass Fail Acknowledge atarmf alarm clears 606 605 Systems contimue to operate per safe egress Reconnect power to local modes 605 i 505 AHU control panel Togglel{gti-iglinterlock to disablerenable. 606 606 8A8 control The three exhaust systems and AHU followr normal modulepower 506 506 4 tan? re system enable sequences. AcknoWIenne alarm! alarm clears NA NA NA NA Raglan Togglel sit-12 interlock to disablelenable. at one 608 Reconnect power to iocal Exhaust systems die-energize due to enable . EF control panel command being removed. The three exhaust systems and AHU follow normal system enable sequences. Graphics indicate loss oi communication with BAS alarms. us .0. 252arh} gets loss of system status tor exhaust 51 0 610 fans and rte?energizes. system gets loss of AHU system (mm CC gm (m Disconnect XTIXP bus Wates in safe egress. 510 control panel status ant: operates in safe egress. U.E.C. 25230? gets loss of AHU system status and 6m 510 operates In sale egress. AHU, and all three exhaust systems indicate Offline BAS status XTIXP module and safe egress mode 610 610 5 moduls- operation. Communication Graphics Indicate loss of communication with . a iarlure atar'ns. USP. 2?2a?h} gets loss of system status for exhaust Disconnect bus tens and tie-energizes. (more oasesconnection to Exhaust . ystem gets less of AHU system 609 509 System Control Panel I and ooerates In safe egress. E?igigi? I system gets loss of AHU system 509 509 MM operates in safe egressgets less of AHU system status and 509 509 operates to safe egress. AHU. and all three exhaust systems indicate Of?ine status module and safe egress mode 609 509 operation. 6 - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. - Issue Verified resolved by commissioning agent. I [New 2mm EFS P399 15 OT 13 - . . - ,t . I . - . Fu?cti??al. a sass men: Ems" .. . {Lil-9}? A Fait- ?ii?li?i? Fe?? a Acknowledge alarml alarm clears_ NA NA NA NA . System continue to operate per safe egress . Reconnect XTIXP bus- modes. 510 Em connection to local AHU Togglel?l interlock to disableienable, sas XTIXP control panel (3) and'AHU follow normal module - system start-up; - - 5 Communication systems are stable failure a AcknoWledge alarm/?alarrn clears NA NA I NA NA system continue to operate per safe egress Restart Reconnect'XTMP bus modecs 609 609 connection to local EF Toggle Iinterlock to disabler'enable. control panel d. Exhaust systems and AHU follow normal 4* system-start-up. 'systems are stable Saree-Bhui?iiwrt? . . . :2 vaide IOW limit a 'Temperature low limit"- alarm Law ?rm temnga??rgo?gg?wm AHU and exhaust systems follow Al?iU failure. 1 Temperature starti'stopsequences. Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears Manually reset low limit and exhaust systemsfoliownormal-start? - up procedure a AHLJ derenorglzes, "Low'suction pressure" alarm Provide tow suction static: initiates Low Subti?n pressure-raise setpoini AHU and-[3] exhaust systems follow AHU failure. 2 . .. startfsiop sequences. tatic Pressure . . - - . . Acknowledge alarmi alarm clears Manually reset Low static AHU andiswxhausts Ste . a] pressure 3! me ow norm ar x. on procedure Issue said to be resolved-by. contractor. - issue verified resolved e5.- commissioning scant. mile. 42 us I: seesaw; Fs his} r-u Page 15 oF1Ei Task Test Parameter Action- Veri?cation Functional BAS Graphics Initial Test Eta-Test Initial Test Flei'est Pm Faii Aenou nor 1 Pass Fall Provide supply duct smoke initiates AHU de-energizes. "Fire alarm shutdown" alarm Supply Duct detector alarm-test switch starti'stop sedgences. AHU and exhaust systems tollow AHU failure Smoke Detector Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears Fteset Duct smoke detector up procedure AHU and exhaust systems follow normal start- AHU remains On 4 Zone Fire Alarm Prowde zone fire alarm in Exhaust systems remain ON zone associated with AHU All systems operate in normal mode. Operation From Fireman's Override Panel AHU deenergizes per FOP command AHU energizes per FOP command XX XX AHU energizes with zone fire alarm AHU energizes with duct smoke alarm AHU does not energize with pres. LL AHU energizes with temp LL Provide startistop input 1 AHU from FOP command. AHU does not ener ize with res. HL perates independently oi AHU x'xx command. Ear-ti: 3 Ioperates independently of AHU Command. [more operates independently of AHU EF die-energizes per FOP command EF energizes per FOP command U. C. 2626101} (imam us -- El c. asaarm Provide startist'opinput from FOP (b}(3}142 gammand. Ioperates independentiy of EF operates independently oi EF command. on (LID U513 :melanum I IAHU operates independently of EF command XX (mew use. 5 252mg: - Issue said to be resolved by Dartmouth EFs Page 17 of 13 IinEIbi 13r42 US no:I13i42 LIE US Test Parameter f? fig?? Functional .. "initial res: Task I ?ction If; Verification Hen-?33" I Inlt'al-Tem- - ?Heat Pass Fail aria-505? "3 I 9335 All;ng i? a EF de?energizes oerFOP command in EF enerolzes er FOP command .. . P- from FOP command. i .. operates independently of EF command: AHU operates independently of EF command a glide-energizesper FOP command EF energizes per FOP command - C. 5 c. 25 Provide star?siop Input .X Cesare? lrom FOP -C?mma?d- . - command. - AHU operates independently of EF com mand Return all setooints and parameters to normal. Ensur?e no alarms are present and system operates as found.? - ACTION He?Ts'st Nores'ziitlsc. Action items: WEM H. 1 See attached for door pressures in safe egress mode 2 and re~energized 15 seconds after power restored to :control panel. 3 This is satisfactory per the designer. -'is&ue said to be resolved by contractor. use. a 252mm . . i: issue verified resolved by commissioning agent. Page 15 of 1B U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUGNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION I Roybal cam pud roir3i42 use. 5 252cm} Mechanical "L?jn Last COMMISSIONING ACTION ITEM LIST 5. ?5 Dialogue I3 .5 System CA Contractor Completion Dates Item 3 .2 2 Unit Tag Floor TYPE I: . . . 3 DATE: Observation - De?ciency Comment DATE, Entity: Response -thon Taken - Resolution Contractor CA Retest Ebii3ii42 a . cocoom have Incorrect SP set point. one shows crime JCI: woo-e minute trenda JCI will 590 Exhaust and RAF report shows set point to be 3.0? BSA entered correct sol continue monitoring. requested that GBA nol change set can M905 MINUS Ugg?gigg? point on 5-15.05. out default value needs act to an" Ipoint if a change is noticed Eh} 3-22-05: The exhaust valve tom actually LEI-150. Both 1 59 ml HAS text and graphic show value as Lil-159. Change wording to 150. comma? Emacs {magnum Iw?mns Floor [an ?i?ow on the ?oor plan graphic. temperature for worm 592 Vwemm a are reuereed. The popr mom ahowthe correct temp Complete memos ooze-eons 1omzoos for the correct room. 3-22-05: Only on the ?oor plan graphic. temperature for rectum . . Floor plan . ,93 Vivarmm ?Pm cow?: reversed. The pup-up wrndowe chew the correct temp Complete anemone oarzorzous romance 9 tor the correct room. Ho 3?22-05: Only on the ?oor plan graphic. temperature for room 5'34 Vivarium gauge on $31 El re reversed. The pop-up windows show the canoe amp Complete cameos oarzorzoos 101412005 for the correct room. Flow 1 3-22-05: DntyI on the floor plan graphic. temperature [or rooml 595 .101 Vivarium a: mm are reversed. The pep-up windows showthe correct temp Complete arzarzoos memos mucous 9 for the correct room. 3-24-05: AHU Graphic page needs to be labede 595 - JCI Graphic Complete NZBIZDOE omens omeooa $24435: Damper1 stays open on a system disable All dampers j, arrng 0m 5 59 JCI controls should close. Apphr to both fan pairs. cwme 095 mm mama 8-24-05: Vericonee were found at 50% with both Fans A E. 598 JCI contron operating. When Raf set up the AHU the cones are to operate at 70% 3-24-05: .16! set cone: to i'li'ii: during dual fan operatlon. era-some (mom use. open. 262301} 3-24-05: On a system disable. both varioonea should go to 0% open. Dnty ten A is going closed. Fan 3 remains at 70% open. 599 controls redowntoaded BX at AHU and system worked once or twice. Later in Compiete MEIEGOS OBIZBIZDOS MEWS the day alter more failures due to testing. the cones did not work again. 13 stayed open at Tutti. 5-3-05: On a tan talture to the AHU. A or or bath tone. the FOP eqo controls OFF is being initiated. If a single tan faliure occurs. the other fan should remain on. Once FOP OFF is initiated, both tans ore-energize. Complete BEQEODS This II the Sequence of operation oi the FOP MEMOOE 9! 132%!) U. S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Note: All closed items are hidden. Page 51 of 5? LLS. (SEU) INFORMATION - II 1331.2 LIS - cor: Roybal Cam peel 1? I Mechanical Vermeer. Last Updated"! 1-3-05 COMMISSIONING ACTION ITEM LIST .9 . ~33 3 Stem CA Dialogue Compietion Dates Item .2 Unit Tag Floor type - DATE: Observation De?ciency - Comment DATE, Entity: Response ?Actron Taken - Resolution Contractor CA Retest sot?es: on a tan failure-to the anu, or or both fans. the FOP OFF is being initiated. if a single tan failure occurs the other fan SODA .J . . . annals should remain on. Once FOP OFF ittated, both fans dis-energize. comptet-E' 9'05 Emma?) wagons FOP sequence was removed from 55-24435: When both lens are failed to the AHU the EF's did not'g'o to JCI iound a loose wire in controtcaoinet Ioc?rtingout ?10 onlmb egress- All alarms were present at AHU screen'and EF screen. a relay. Problem ?xed. m2?: 5 3 4 26 5 3-2405: When tooth-fans are failed to the the alarm reset I 602 ml should not hang the AHU hack on. {onlyone single fan failure) With Camplete magmas a dual laiiure the system should be Disabled. then Enabled to bring system back: up on normal start up. 8-24-05: When an EF'is in safe-egress. melts the background blink E503 JCI Graphic red indicating a problem. some backgrounds are green, Complete OSIEQFZUDS smzoos some are red and somersro ain while. Elia: Marcellus pulled the supply line oil the solo ator'and 3-24-05: When dampers are commanded closed they need to get a plugge? the end' OW:de EFT and mama?? amt EFT 'Position . . and iniine analog gauge showed that air was bing lost. EFT i504 Bypass sea: Elm [Baum WhentumyFrai rgnpis In ttept cycling to make up lost air. Suggest-running test pol},r D9i21t2ilo5 torsrzoos h, i I damper a ?my fa a; DEBT PET in" bag am] from actuator to #2 stairway. Pilotpositloner .2 2mm are manua mounting was Mesa lightened (update will he Pmuided 9M4 Elam 94721 Jay to do today 3-24-05: On a singleton failure to en EF to be ableto reset Ihe tailed fan with out disabling the system. Add the merit - . 0 200 9! ratios EDS button to text and graphic. The should not wort-r If both tans are sample? Brzg?fzms 3mg: 5 In alarm. 3-24-05: When the controiier power was failed to the AHU, the EF's eos JCI controls do not recognize the-AHU egress mode. All. BHIZDUS EF continued to maintain SP set point. 6m. JCT comma 43-24415: On a oommunications tailure to the N2 bus. the AHU did not gn?mun? receive a Comm. storm. Esme sis-549.2 B-Ed-?tt?: On an EF controller power failure. the AHU starred cos JCI controls energized and EF's wentto egress mode. At the page there Complete MEIEGBS osrasraoos smzoos was no indication that the EF's were in safe egress. tit-24435: When the ET bus was pulled from the EF's the AHU shut down like it should. but the EF'sdid not go to egress mode. Once EF's go to egress. the indication at the AHLI page should show EF's in egress. 6?59 JCI controls Complete 312292005 DEBBIEUQS SEEMS U. 8. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED Note: All closed items are hidden. Page 52 0f 5?1 U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION Task Test Parameter Action Verification Functional HAS Graphics In ltial Test Fla-Test Initial Test Reu?i'est Pass Fail WON I Pass ACTION Fall 2 cont. AHU Restart after failure cont. Eta-energize supply fan- close disconnect Fan 8 Acknowledge alarrni alarm clears Fan is indexed ON Gravity backdraft dampers open on fan 8 ?10070} Inlet cone an Fan returns from closed to two-fan operating postion. Inlet cone on Fan A returns from open to two-tan operating postion. 3K )4 Fan A decreases speed to maintain setpoint - static setpoint is adequately maintained during ramp. Exhaust systems continue to operate in normal operation mode Exhaust systems are stable Supply air system stabilizes. AHU System Failure Fail AHU See note #1 HAS indicates AHU failure, alarms Unit-'3? AHU is indexed OFF U-S-C- 2521*? tern controller recognizes AHU failure and begins to operate in safe egress mode. Graphics indicate safe egress mode of operation clue to AHU off. 601 601 9 [system controller recognizes AHU failure and begins to operate in safe egress mode. Graphics indicate safe egress mode of operation due to AHU off. 601 501 szstem controller recognizes AHU failure and begins to operate in safe egress mode. Graphics indicate safe egress mode of operation due to AHU off. 601 601 AHU Restart after System Failure Re-energize AHU a Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears System continue to operate per safe egress modes. 602 602 Togglem interlock to disablel'enabie. (3) Exhaust systems and AHU follow normal system start-up. Exhaust systems are stable -n Supply air system is stable. U. S. GUVERNMEINIT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION 8 - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. - issue veri?ed coached by commissioning agent. I (mom use. 262a[h] lemmas: Pagesorts us. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE sur uu alFieo {sea} IN FORMATION . a. u. Functional BAS Graphics Task Test Farametm Action Veri?cation Initial T'est Fla-Test initial Test RsaTest Pass] Fail I Pass] Fail 1m" 6 I Safe Egress Uperation?AHU OFF a BAS indicates AHU failure. alarms b- contimtes to operate CreateAHU failure to :Ih: de-energizes 1 initiate Safe Egress TWo~position bypass damperremains open. Mods Operation Modulatingijypass damper opens 100% X- . system indicates operating mode of safe egress-AHU failure a . I ates AHU failure. alarms - continues to operate X- Create AHU failure to 3,32? de-energizes 2 initiate Safe Egress Two-positionbypass damper remains open. Mode Operation Modulating_bypass damper opens 100% system indicates operating mode of safe egress-AHU failure 1 BAS indicates AHU failure. alarms Create AHU failure to continues to operate 3 initiate Safe Egress Modulatingl: pass damper opens 100% Egress Made operation a emyindicales operating mode of safe egress-AHU failure. a AHU desenergizes priorto exhaust systems ystern . . . entering'safe egress gperatio'n. 4 Characteristics SyStem AHU staticpressure declines prior to exhaust systems static pressure. sate Egress Operatialiu 2%ng OFF Weystem status Failure alarm initiates, De- .. a .. use. 202a energizes AHU. 1 AHU Safe Egress initiate Sfe Egress Al-lU shuts down prior to other exhaust systems x- Mode Operation 9mg Into safe egress mode. 6 AHU- indicates operating mode of safe egress- - failure. a BAS i'ndioatesl. . ?'ii'i'i?a lfailure, alarms i I is continues to operate Create USC- 252 failure to m: 2 Safe Egress initiate Safe Egress Two-positionbypass damper-remainsoperi. Mods Operation Mcdulating?pass damper opens 100% Exhausts stem indicates operating mode of safe egress? u' site's 2 failure . - issue said to be resolved or contractor. - issue veri?ed resolved by commiSsioning agent. i Li. 3. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORIMMTION us :3 ?2s2a.h; Page 1' OHS U5. ENTBENSITWE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Lawson, Robert From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Mon day, July 201?. 2:39 PM To; Milhy, Stephen C. IDII3- ?32 3 eg regs 42 U5 Ci IUII3I =13 Attachments: a .doc; FPT- 2523'? EFS '3 2523 CDC- Th anks, Paul Probst w?Original From: Pat'Prendergast Sent; 'lr'lu'ednesdatrl June ?13, 2012 7:20 PM To: Prohst, E. (Ia-Dan Abitz; Chad Baker Subject: RE: Safe egress Hey Paul- Attached is all we could come up with. Our report is in storage, and unfortunately, back then we-did not do the reports in electronic'format. I have a call in to get it from storage, however that LIsuaIIv takes a few-days. Notes: 1. we did test that system with a safe egress mode. 2. our testing procedure indicated that we recorded the space pressures, but I don't know if it is in the report-or not. If 1you have a copy' look in the same-area as that testing procedure in Volumes land 3. 3.:we have included 'a project record th?it'i'sp 'thE?s?afe _egres_s,_and 4. We may not have recorded the pressures due to the fact that: a. there is no adjustment to the exhaust fans - so you get what you get with both bypass-dampers open. in. the safe egress was put in as an additional Safety measure. TheanIy time it would be initiated is Air handler supply fans failed. That would be a double or two failure scenario which is generally not accounted for in industry practice. Attachedjre the testing precediire." tha't?talks .ah?ou't'th??sequence, and the issues list which indicates the and Cos associated with it?tem 1 on the list]. I Itnow that is not munch - but hope it helps. Pat Patrick A Prendergast, P- E. GBA /ViroCon_. Inc. pprendergast@ehateam.com direct: 316.842.1190? ext. 212 I office: 316.342.9225 fax: 315.342.1133 rues. ?--?-Orlginal Message?? 1 LLS. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SELF) INFORMATION us. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (59m INFORMATION From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:20 PM To:PatPrendergast Subject: Safe egress Pat This {InlyI applies to the Vivarium area. Thanks, Paui 2 U5. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE INFORMATION SYSTEM CONSEDERATKDNE loss :12 U3 E?zalli - The yari-cone positionfor ith both fans operating should be at 73% open for both fans. - The sari-cone position with only one fan operating should be l00%-opeii for the operating fan and 0% open for the non-operating fan. HE: 252th: .. 2; .EF pairl I -:42 I: If there is a single fan failure to either b'otlr'h'ypa-ss dampers - 3 must go fully closed in order to maintain static pressure set point. The sequenee'is so that the hero position damper elosesahd the" modulating damper shall modulate to maintain SP set point. If either of the bypass dampers is cracked open just the static pressure set point will not be able to hernaintained. There has been an ongoing problem with the dampers not Closing at 100% closed signal from the EAS. mil-3342 LIE 0 2:32am} .. .. and Exhaust fan Interlucks - If the AIM has both FAN A and FAN off in a failure alarm all associated exhaust fans will go into safe egress operation. - If the AHU has only one fan failure all associated exhaust-systems shall continue to operate under normal operatingcondilions. m3 4; us as 3523*? both-fans-of either pairl Ifail, the entire system will be disabled. The AHU will be indexed off prior to other exhahst systems de-energizing. uses . 25.213.th - If a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairs I the .- system will continue to-operate under normal operating conditions. "ass on failure; will be indexed one, and both exhaust fan pairs- will be. indexed to safe egress mode. tensor use 5 262mm 4. Safe Egress Operation 2523M: .. I I I End?c?en'nuinbEr will be indexed off. So if the fans egressimode,? ?slur will r?m?in 0N this two assassins desserts l??ilippos- runs: 42 uses zezam: US. GGVERNMENT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) INFORMATION U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED (SEIU) INFORMATION USE. . . ?2523thi safe egress operation at so that the bypass damper goes to 100% open. 5. AHU and EF Restart after a failure. If any of the exhaust fans are in egress mode, the AHU should already be off. To re?Enahle the system, the user must first disable the system from the SB point in the text mode. Wait for all systems static pressure to drop to Clear any alarms present, then Enable the SB Interloeks point from text mode. If there is a single fan failure to the AHU or a single fan failure to either of the paired exhaust fans the alarm can be cleared without disabling the system. Simply reset the alarm from either the test or graphics to ON and then to OFF again. The failed fan will be reset and come back on without interruption to the system. I. All failures and interlocks were tested and worked properly on 9-7?05. 2. During the week of 11-3405, GBA was on site for testing and noticed the interlocks were not functioning as tested. 3. Ex: GBA noticed the AHU was ON and maintaining SP set point, but all exhaust fan systems were in Egress mode. This should never happen. U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEPJ From: Lawson. Robert Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 9:54 AM To: Milby, Stephen C. {cocrocooi'eFm Cc: Protest, Paul E- Raymond. George Whattey, Marcus Subject: ?b?lj?i?tzU-S-C-W?ath? evel. Safe Egress Issue (2005 Commissioning) Attachments: 5252a? 03FE32005).pdf: - a - - I Ch" ommissioningActionltemListpd? K-Issues List with Probst Email.pdf; A Vivarium Egress rev2'i'JUL2012 pep_.doc Importance: High Steve: Pervour request, the draft document with attachments for the 2005 safe egress issue from the Block are enclosed for you to edit. NOTE: I have also letter the ?les in the order that they should be sorted, but the "insuf?cient response? notice appears twice in the timeline and only once as an attachment. There are multiple dates on this document that fall at different points in the timeline; Paul and I worked on this repeatedly and I would advise you to review it for clarify/concurrence. Regards, Boh Lawson. Ardtitect DID Project Manager Capital Improvements Management Of?ce (CIMOJ LLS. Centers For Disease Control 5: Prevention This email and any attachments contain LLS. Government SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) reouiring special handling safeguards. to protect agalnst. unauthorized disclosure. All information is. considered pertinentto the national interests of the IJ.S. Government and Is intended soler for the addressee. Please visit Customer Satisiatiion Survev and tell us about your recent experiences Hath BFO. CO 404 Rev 2.pdf; I [are {Bus-2 =age EST-3 IDIHI Page 2580 {jbliauzclz use. Page 2531 use. Page 2582 U.S.C. Page 2583 U.S.C. Page 2534 U.S.C. Page 2535 U.S.C. Page 2586 use. US. GOVERMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) INFORMATION lawson, Robert (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ From: Probst. Paul E. Sent: Monday. July 09. 2012 2:39 PM To: Milby, Stephen c- (coqocooxaroi Subject: Emimzusc?' . egress tot IREV3.slsx; coc- Thanks, Paul Probst -??--0riginal Message?- From: Pat Prendergast Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 7:20 PM To: Probst, Paui E. Cc: Dan Abitz; Chad Baker Subject: RE: Safe egress Hey Paul- Attached is all we could come up with. Our report is in storage, and unfortunately, back then we did not do the reports in electronic format. I have a call in to get it from storage, however that usually takes a few days. Notes: 1. we did test that system with a safe egress mode. 2. our testing procedure indicated that we recorded the space pressures, but i don't know if it is in the raport or not. if you have a copy took in the same area as that testing procedure in Volumes 2 and 3. 3. we have included a project record that speci?cally discusses the safe egress and sequence of operation for it. 4. we may not have recorded the pressures due to the fact that: a. there is no adjustment to the exhaust fans so you get what you get with both bypass dampers open. In. the safe egress was put in as an additional safety measure. The only time it would be initiated ls if BOTH Air handler supply fans failed. That would be a double or two failure scenario which is generally not accounted for in industry practice. Attached are the testing procedure. The project record that talks about the sequence, and theissues list whidl Indicates the and Cos associated With itlitem 1 on the list). I know that is not much - but hope it helps. Pat Patrick A Prendergast, P. E. 1 GBA filtration. Inc. I norendereast@ebateam.com direct: 816.842.4907 ext-le office: 816.842.9225 I fax: 815.842.1133 lmobile: (DIES) ?-?Original Message-?? 1 U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION U.S. GOVERMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) INFORMATION From: PIobst, Paul E, (CDCZOCDDIBFDJ Sent: Wednesday, June :13, 2012 5:20 PM TnzPatPrendargast Subject: Safe egress Fan This only applies to the Vivarium area; Thanks, Paul 2 GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBUJ INFORMATION U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASS1FIED (SBU) INFORMATDN 150139115,- Jason Frpm: Derrick 'nt: Wednesday. March 30. 2005 1:15 PM 10: [ll-1'23} 42 USE. 252:1 Subject: Re: PCO 262mm Jason: Attached ia the requested.proposa1. the requested door list. I have need a factur of 1D min per door and attached Hegarda, Karin Derrick Engineering Manager Research Air F10, Inc. kevin?aresearchairflo . com 770452-3292 (office) J. US. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BLIT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) INFORMATION Illif3?242 252a[l1' [b38242 [me-sz 2523??: (HES) l?E .LNEWNHEAOB 'S'r'l 3129:0005 CUHZA Inc. =age 259* IDIHI =age 2595 Hindi .12 I: :3 - Ih'll' lsesam; I 2 Page I of 1 U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT (son) INFORMATION Huteell, Randy I From: Hutsell, Randy Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2005 12:25 PM To: CDC Elder, Richard; CDC Payne, Michael Ce: MCCARTHY Harris, Edwin; MCCARTHY Roberts, Jason; Cannion, Angelle .recommend approval of the subject PCO. From: Kinnard,'ilames Sent: Tue enema 05 10:50 AM M13242 use 3 To: 93A Hum I 2 Our response to the above PCCI is attached. We recommend approval. U5 (Rev?) Review Responsedocsvb- Jim Kinnard CUHZA architecture. engineering. planning. IZGI Peaohtree Street. NE 400 Colony Square, Suite 60!} Atlanta, GA 30361-3500 Tel 464-315-IQIZ Fax 404-315-310? Direct Tel aim??ll [-3622 Direct Fax 609-391-7305 jkinnard@euh2a.com NOTICE: All information contained in or attached to this email constitutes con?dential information belonging to CUHZA, inn. Architecture Engineering Planning, its af?liates and subsidiaries anchor its clients. It is intended for business use only and all other uses or disclosures are strictly prohibited. If the reader of this message was not an intended recipient by the sender, hefshe is hereby noti?ed that any dissemination, distribution, or copying ofthis communication is strictly prohibited. If'you have received this communication, and were not an intended recipient of the sender, please notify the sender by phone or email and return the original message to the sender by mail. Thank you. 7f5f2005 U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITNE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) G. .252th! CDC Hoybal Campus Date: . .-, .2 August-05 Insvs GEORGE ASSOEIATIS, IHG. ivarium FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE TES By: CCB i WAS - Emotional:- Fla-Test? asserts-i .-.Irjri Tess-Ti screw. l-i IrEux-I ?931: retina .1 4 Pass.? rivals-ass. .. The exhaust system is enabled. (concurrent with EF - Start Sequence other two exhaust systems] EFs energizeI fan motor status verified for both USE. 252mm. System status verified. Two-position bypass damper opens anD??-i Modulating Bypass damper PID loop enabled, modulates to maintain static pressure. The exhaust system is enabled. {concurrent with EF - Start Sequence other two exhaust systems} .min a? 2523 EFs energize. fan motor status verified for both rm System status verified. Systems Fiun bypass damper opens Vivarium Modulating Bypass damper loop enabled, modulates to maintain static pressure. (I) 0.05m Enable ONIOFF command The exhaust system is enabled. (concurrent with EF - Start Sequence other two exhaust systems} 1 ON tuna-:42 UE c. 5. 2732mm. EF energizes, fan motor status verified System status verified. (Text Mode on ly- . . Moduiating Bypass damper loop enabled, modulates to maintain static pressure. IlZIli': :12 .SC ?2523ilii immlOCkS?) Start command issued to AHU upon all (3) exhaust systems Flun status verification. to Outside air damper opens, and switch makes Varicones modulate from closed to preset operating position. 7?0 open 598 598 AHU- Start Sequence Supply fans are started at minimum VFD positions Supply tan VFDs modulate in unison to maintain SP setpoint Heating program switches to operating PHCDAT control setpoint. SP: deg Cooling programs becomes active. XX XX 01- Issue said to be resolved by contractor. '-..lssue veri?edresaluad In EFs Page! or 13 .- . . . 4 it! V. .- grass f: pres-eases; if?" . actipnc "Verifiestion "3 {fie-"Fest a Record time delay between system start command and exhaust systems starts System Fiun . Record tlme delay between exhaust systems starts '1 cont. Enable ONIOFF System Characteristics and AHU start. 30 seconds Command cont. Verify exhaust systems achieve static pressure setpoints prior to AHU achieving static pressure it setpoint. a After 30 second time delay - BAS removes run command and AHU de-energizes. Outside air damper closes. and switch makes St?p Sequence iv?aricones modulate to closed positions. 599 599 Heating program switches to non-operating PHODAT control setpoint. SP: 7?0 deg 9 Cooling program becomes inactive. CHW valve closes 30 seconds after system On status is removed System Run Ste seuence a from AHU. BAS removes run command from Enable use. ?2E2alht exhaust system Command Modulating bypass damper modulates closed. 597 59? Two-position bypass damper closes 2 OFF 30 seconds after system On status is removed mm a from AHU, BAS removes run command from EZEzsmi exhaust system (T??lggy' Modulating bypass damper modulates closed. 597 59? . I, Two-position bypass damper closes InterIOCks 30 seconds after system On status is removed a from AHU. 8A8 removes run command from EF bypass damper modulates closed. 597 597 a Verify AHU static pressure is sufficiently decreased prior to exhaust systems de?energizing. System Characteristics Record time delay between system stop command and AHU stop Record time delay between AHU system stop and exhaust systems stops - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. - Issue verified resolved by commissioning agent. US C: USE. hE'v'Bsils Page 2 of 1B . . :7 - is" reset ?res; - :r-elmiiarest . ?nest ?fi? . 1 3* 5? 5f"; .35: Adjust SF static pressure a VFDs increase fan speed. setpoint higher VFDS modulate to maintain increased SP setpoint . sp System stabilizes to maintain New 8P setpoint Supply Fan Statlc 1 pressure control Adjust SF static pressure a VFDS decrease fan Speed setpoint lower VFDs modulate to maintain decreased SP setpoint Sp? Svstemistabilizes to maintain New SP setpoint a PHCLAT setpoint is reset 3 deg below LAT Adjust AHU LAT setpoint giggly valves modulate towards the open h'ghg-rEIatwdengEA-r 8 Hot water valves modulate to maintain new LAT Preheat Eatpf?ltl b'l' LAT Leaving air on re toop a Hzes main am new 2 temperature 83 pom control a PHCLAT setpoint is reset 3 deg below LAT Adjust AHU LAT setpoint giggivrcalter valves modulate towards the closed lowj're'atwgf SAT 6' associatessonata to ashram new on p? ?3 setpoint Control loop stabilizes to maintain new LAT . setpoint a Chilled water valves modulate towards the closed . . position A?iu?teiljeL?ahfe-rtge??nrt Chilled water valves modulate to maintain new LAT Llnit Leaving air 9 de setpoint Temperature Control loop stabilizes to maintain new LAT 3 control (Cooling setpoint Coil Control] a Chilled water valves modulate towards the open . . position Chilled water valves modulate to maintain new LAT 5 d5 sstnaht . p? Control loop stabilizes to maintain new LAT . setpoint - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. I - Issue verified resolved by commissioning agent. 42 2'32? EFs Page 3 of 18 .. i Functional i i. . i initial. Test-ELPum energizes Index Pump ON satpmm Pumg pro?otof runindicated above 0A temp Hot water control valve modulates to ad'u*t to Preheat coil setpoint degF . 7: 4 Fiecirculatiing Increased ?ow PFulgili:l Index Pump Salaam a Pump minimum run time is exceeded 5 minutes 5? below 0A temp is Pump de-energizes, indication correct setpoint degF Hotwater control valve modulates to adjust to decreased flow .. .. . a Pump energizes '"dex Pump ON 39mm Pump proof of run indicated it it above 0A ?emp Hot water control valve modulates to ad'ust to Preheat coil setpoint degF . 5 Fiecirculatiing '?Craased Index Pump setpoim a_ Pump run time Is exceeded - 5 minutes below 0A temp in Pump de-energizes, FOR indication correct setpoint degF Hot water control value modulates to adjust to . decreased flow ?it hand ih'g 35;? . .. :f'?fifi'i 19-3 7? if BAS indicates tan failure, alarm Failed fan A is indexed OFF Fail AHU supply {an?pen Fan increased speed tomaintain setpoint-static BOG 600 disconnect setpoint Is adequater maintained durtng ramp. 1 Fa'mre Gravity backdraft damper isolates failed fan A. I Fan A inlet cone on Fan A closes inlet cone on Fan opens Exhaust systems continue to operate in normal 9 operation mode Disable Fan A Same sequence is repeated as for a failure. 112 U63: 53252 551? Issue said to be resolved by contractor. 262mm aha-- -. Task -- variirsf?tis?a.z? Irimslasers?egg? Easiest: i - a BAS indicates fan failure, alarms Failed tan is indexed OFF a - 1+ Fan A increased speed to maintain setpoint - static Fall AHU SUpply fan-Open setpoint is adequately maintained during ramp. AHU Failure disconnect 600 600 1conl. Cont. gravity backdratt damper isolates failed fan A. Inlet cone on Fan A opens (3) Exhaust systems continue to operate in normal operation mode Disable Fan Same sequence is repeated as for a failure. Acknowledge alarm} alarm clears .i Fan El inlet cone on Fan closes 9 Fan A is indexed ON Gravity backdra? dampers open on fan A. inlet cone on Fan A returns from closed to two-fan operating postion. D. Fle?energize supply fan- inlet cone on Fan El returns lrom open to two-fan AHU Restart close disconnect gerating postion. er a" all? 9 Fan decreases speed to maintain setpoint static Fan A I setpoint is adequately maintained during ramp. Exhaust systems continue to operate in normal operation mode Exhaust systems are stable i Supply air system stabilizes. a. - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. [b.5542 I- ?2E2alm . - Issue verified resolved by commissioning agent- I Fs Page 5 at 13 ion"; :12 42 42 man-42 frT?e Verification? . . . a e. 'ch?t ins-Tart.- acres flair-=2. ?air 2 COM. AHU Flestart after failure cont. Flo-energize SUpply lan- close disconnect Fan Acknowledge alarm; alarm clears Fan is indexed ON Gravityr backdraft dampers open on fan Inlet cone on Fan returns from closed to mic-tan Operating postlon. Inlet cone on Fan A returns from open to two-tan operating postion. Fan A decreases speed to maintain setpoint static setpoint is adequater maintained during ramp. (3)'Exhaust systems continue to operate in normal operation mode Exhaust systems are stable air system stabilizes. JS (3. 252th 3 AHU System Failure LLSC . lill-[U iSE?j??tP-Z?l} BAS indicates AHU failure, alarms germ-m:- in AHll is inrlere OFF 1K system controller recognizes AHU failure and begins to operate in safe egress mode. Graphics indicate safe egress mode of operation l. 601 601XX system controller recognizes'iAHUg' failure and begins to-operate-in safe egress mode. Graphics indicate sate egress mode of operation 601 XX and begins to operate in safe egress mode. Graphics indicate safe egress mode of operation due to AHU off. 601 .601 x. AHU Restart after System Failure Flo?energize AH Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears System continue to operate per sate egress modes. 602 Toggle interlock to disablerenable. 602 Exhaust systems and AHU follow normal system start-up. Exhaust systems are stable Suppl}.r air system is stable. Issue said to be resolved by contractor. . bar-comm issionlng-egent: c.52523m; [Revertist USE. 2?2 Il'.l a 1 . Functionalwi Task Test Parameter-s Action Verification Inuit? T851 . IHiti?l Test Pass Fail . 'Pass Fail '6 Safe EgressTOperation-AHU-OFF a BAS indicates AHU failure, alarms as: minus-s to operate -- - I Create AHU failure to tie-energizes 1 Sale Egress initiate Safe Egress Two-position bypass damper remains open. Mode Operation Modulation bypass damper opens 100% mien: . .. system indicates operating mode of sale i . egress-AHU failure a BAS indicates AHU failure, alarms I'bl-I'Si'42 USE. 5; 252ml" Ogrg??m. la. continues to operate Create AHU failure to de-energizes 2 Safe Egress initiate Safe Egress Tvuosposition bypass damper remains open. Mode Operation Modulatin bypass damper opens 100% .. .. system indicates operating mode of safe . egress-AHU failure a a BAS indicates?HU failure, alarms {333th safe . AHU failure to -- Eontinu es to operate .3 initiate Safe Egress ieting bypass damper opens 100% 4: use ?2s2atr Egress M?Dde - - - . egress-AHU failure. a AHU de-energizes prior to exhaust systems 4 System I System Characteristics entering safe egress operationrl Characteristics AHU static pressure declines prior to exhaust m3 4 systems static pressure system status Failure alarm initiates, De- lmtaraz usc 5252mm a energizes AHU . fallure t0 . AHU Sale . . . AHU shuts down prior to other exhaust systems 1 Initiate Safe Egress . . Egress Mode 0 . gonng Into safe egress mode. peratlon . . . AHU Indicates operating mode of safe egress? use . . . Tam IbifEiZ-i' .. . . I Fi?? rodloatec failure, alarms unlit-1.: U5 0 3 2D28l i .. continues to operate [bli3i4e .. . .. .. . .. .. 0mm- fallure c, de?energizes 2 Safe Egress initiate Safe Egress Two-position bypass damper remains open. Mode Operation Modulating bypass damper opens 100% Exhaust system Indicates operating mode oi sale 42 use. egress I failure - issue said to be resolved by contractorIssue verified resolved by commissioning agent. IIWIUH2 8'6 [3:42 EFS Page 7 0f ?3 .. "linear-Ed": 1-. 3:11.; Task ':Iesi.Eaitametfer5? - - - v?lmE-aron - tram: est; - ?Ts'sti. InitialriT??t?? 50.5.5: mains? . ?ctiond?cdll .I Ifailure, alarms luvcont ones to operate .- to He de-energizes 3 Safe Egress initiate Safe Egress Two-position bypass damper remains open. Mode Operation Modulating bypass damper opens 100% Exhaus ndicates operating mode of safe rhi-I'B'x-lE US C: 252301 . . a AHU de-energizes prior to remaining exhaust 4 System i System Characteristics systems entering safe egress operation. I Characteristics AHU static pressure declines prior to remaining I exhaust systems static pressure. I - . get-2BAG-indicates fan motor status failure. alarms, removes run command Two -pos ition damper modulates closed. Modulating damper continues to modulate to setpoint continues to operate. "Exhaust static maintained. 604 604 AHU continues to operate (2) other exhaust systems continue to operate Acknowlec ge alarm.l alarm clears follows normal start-up procedures Fan motor status is verified for both fans Two-position damper modulates to open position Modulating damper continues to modulate to maintaij setpoint Icontinues to operate. other exhaust systems continue to operate AHU continues to operate Exhaust Fan 1 Failure Fail exhaust fan-open rears use team . . 605 605 605 605 I605 605 605 605 605 605 605 605 605 605 60.5_ 605 42 USA3153 262301 EF Fieslarl after 2 Failure Fla-energize exhaust tan- .ms 42 use 5; 25m close disconnect us 0 '5 262arh :Lo?s to magnum-alumni. :r - Issue said to be resolved by contractorrails .4: USE. ?2o23i 1> - Issue veri?ed resolved by agent. I hEV3.xls EFs Page 8 of 18 lot-[3x42 [Eli-[3, :12 42 [b.1342 Itlil': :12 Task . Test Parameter; Action. Verification: . . Functional BAS Graphics "initial Test initial Test. I H's-Test - i-?jii; Pass Fail ac LBe-Test .- iFiassi - ?GTtoNi Fail?. "new it it U.S.C. Exhaust Fan Failure Fail exhaust fan-open removesrun command 3A8 indicates fan mototr status failure, alarms, I I Two-position damper modulates closed. Modulating damper continues to modulate to maintaino setpoint continues to operate. Exhaust tan system static maintained. 604 604 AHU continues to operate other exhaust systems continue to operate 4 JS 0 ?252alh US 0 2612th U5 262;}th .. EF Restart after Failure Hus-energize exhaust fan- close disconnect 505 605 alarm} alarm Clears 605 605 Fan motor status is verified for both fans 605 605 Two-position damper modulates to open position 505 605 to Qo?mmwm?o (To: Modulating damper continues to modulate to maintain setpoint continues to opt-irate; 505 605 605 605 other exhaust systems continue to operate 605 605 )1 XXII-CK AHU continues to operate 505 605 use. 252m; 5 Exhaust system c. 2523i CC S. I JEN: BAS indicates exhaust system status iailure. and both fan motor status failures. alarms Modulating bypass damper modulates closed. Two-Position bypass damper closes. AHUde-energizes before remaining exhaust systems .Fail..e.x-ha-ust-system-open both disconnects +lrun enable removed-system de- energizes - Irun enable removed-system de- energizes. AHU static pressure declines prior to remaining exhaust Walla? disabled due to system shutdown 1 5x XX XX :4 USE. ?2?c - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. - Issue veri?ed resolved by agent. [blii'jiai2 USE. 252ath: Iii:- IEEV3.xlsx EFs Pages ol1a all'l 2 t: J3 I a Acknowledge alarm:r alarm clears 605 Exhaust System in Systems continue to to remain 'de-energized. 605 605 us C: ?2szam . . 1 - 5 6 tests - system?close disconnects system enabIlIeIsequencesExhaust systems are stable Supply air system is stable rule :42 as. 2Ei2=aihz ISIZ-?ail?ref :7 -Q a BAS indicates fan mototr status failure. alarms. removes run command Exhaust Fan Two-position damper modulates closed. I Failure Fa? exhaust fan?pen Modulatan dampeItr continues to modulate to II I . maintain 6P setpoint test see . complies OperateI I IX Exhaust tan system status maintained. AHU continues to operate (2) other exhaust systems continue to operate II I I I a ge alarm:f alarm clears I 605 ?Hm-42 -- follows normal start-up procedures 605 605 Fan motor status is verified for both fans 605 605 EF Restart alter Two-position damper modulates to preset open 2 Failure Fla-energize exhaust fan~ position 605 I 605 i i Us I close disconnect Modulating damper continues to modulate to 605 605 maintain SP setpolnt .. f. . Ioontinues to operate. 605 605 other exhaust systems continue to operate 605 605 AHU continues to operate 605 605 a BAS indicates fan mototr status failurel alarmsI removes run command Exhaust Fan avg-position damper modulates closed. Failure Fa? exhaust fan?pen atth damper continues to modu ate to 3 discannect majntaln - - - - -- ontfnues to operate_ Exhaust fan system status maintained. AHU continues to operate other exhaust systems continue to operate - Issue verified resolved by commissloning agent. HEV3.xls EFs Page 10 of 10 .. 3. or. . 9' HAS-Graphics 4 mire: 42 .by3t4: rbd3c42 IDHSE42 7:15 . Eras- Faflg: ?it; a Acknowlec ge alarmir alarm clears 605 605 - - follows normal start-up procedures 605 805 Fan motor status is verified for both tans 605 605 EF Restart after Two-position damper modulates to preset open . 4 Failure Fte?energize exhaust fan- position 605 605 US c; I?H2?3?nllf~i close disconnect Modulating damper continues to modulate to 605 605 [r WP setpornt f' lcontinues to operate. 605 605 glother exhaust systems continue to operate 605 605 AHU continues to operate 605 605 a BAS indicates exhaust syStem status failure, and both fan motor status failures. alarms Modulating bypass damper modulates closed. Two-Position bypass damper closes. Exhauat.5ystem. system run enable removed-system Failure Fail exhaust system?open de-eneroizes 05.052623011- . 5 0.5.2.2.. I run enable removed-system de- . a 1. I .. energizes. AHU static pressure declines prior to remaining 9 . a exhaust Systems static pressure. US 0 Iindicate Llano. 2523 a Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears 605 605 Exhaust System 6 Systems continue to to remain de?energized. 605 605 . F1EEHEUT.HIMET Intefhnc??tC1c?s?ibdejer1atha- 6 Failure Re-energlze The three exhaust systems and AHU follow normal system-close disconnects system enable-sequences. Exhaust systems are stable Supply air system is stable - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. m3. 4: 5 52,323,? . .l It - Issue veri?ed resolved by commissioning agent. i Page 11 of 18 Task Test Paramet?h Action Veri?cation Test Fla-Test I'lnitlai Test Fla-Test - .A'crlox . Pass Fall mam I-te? Pass Fail Guam; 5 'hl'gl'? 2523" Failure Sequences BAS indicates exhaust fan failure, alarms, removes run command - - Bypass damper modulates closed. Exhaust system failure static pressure drops below selpcint, AHU de-energizes before remaining ?mum Fan Fail emaum fan open exhaust systems go into sate egress mode. 1 Failure disconnect (2) other exhaust systems begin to operate in safe egress mode after AHU has die-energized. (2) other exhaust systems and AHU graphics indicate operation in safe egress due to - oil. Disable exhaust system in text mode. AHU and J5 CI ?2523lli'. Functional I Has Graphics Disable Exhaust system . exhaust systems perform per failure a Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears System continue to operate per safe egress EF Restart after modes. 'hllgi?? '3 0 Failure. Bis-energize- - Togo-lei - hterlock to disablefenable. close disconnect (3) Exhaust systems and AHU follow normal . 42 Is c. 252a h} Exhaust systems are stable Supply air system stabilizes. I "1 Graphics indicate loss of communication with a BAS alarms. AHU continues to operate as a stand alone a Bf?g?grm Disconnect LAN controller. -6 . .. connection to. local . .. islet? continues to Operate- ommunlcatlon I failure control panel system continues to operate. tEIl'I3l--'12 . loontinues to operate. ?342 is?: exexhaust systems indicate Offline - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. - Issue veri?ed resolved by commissioning agent. [bz hE?U?3.xls {3542 EEs Page 12 of 1a Itb:i3i'42 252mm . . - . Functionallj HAS-Graphics ?Task Test Parameter Action - verification. [?iti?l T351 'hltlal'?a?t a apnoea - - ACTION . Pass Fail P355 Fall new Disconnect LAN Graphics indicate loss of communication with connection to Exhaust BAialarms. BOYXX a [mu-3:442 252a[h_ 3A5 control must-42 (MBME ?130 2628?? Communlcatlon .. . . a ystem continues to operate. system continues to operate_._ lEJntinues to operate. AHU, nd ll three exh us systems indicate Offline . . Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears ystem continues to operate. continues to operate. I ontinues to operate. . to Operate- Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears - ?econnect continues to operate. a .. continues to operate. Cl a . b}[3l242 .JSC ?2523Lli NA NA ferret-:42 ?2E2atr,' . .. iptr3} 42 use. 2523th BAS control lunar-12 seaf??s?atnf "Howl-le- communication Ibl-[3l-Z42 JS 0 @2523.? failure NA 2 33: NA ?2?2allT HEStan Jig-C?s continues to operate. ?Ontlnues to operate. Graphics indicate loss of communication with BAS alarms. AHU loses run command. contact opens and fan ole-energizes. Ibis?? J5 0 3252s?? system controller recognizes AHU loss of status and begins to operate in safe egress 605 606 A BAS control . man?I ?3?42 .modu-lewPower- #ystem controller recognizes AHU failure loss loss of status and begins to operate in safe 606 608 I ?q a emessmde. -- Isystem controller recognizes AHU loss a of loss of status and begins to operate in safe 806 606 egress mode. AHU. and all three exhaust systems indicate . . .. LIE-C $23ll1- ISSUE Said ?3 b0 by [Egg-.342 U511 - Issue verified resolved by commissioning agent. REV3.xlsx l3t4 EFs Page 13 of1? rbH3142 :12 lbn3s42 . .L IDES-.42 . use Fv'ng'dti?h'al i . . v'e'ririca'tiarif? :He-r?st? Fecesres: 5' an: 43*" Graphics indicate loss of co munication with BAS alarms. ?3:133:33 .. I I haust system loses run MM US 525 EU-mman contacts remam closedcontacts open. and system operates in "emergency" mode. System bypass damper modulates to preset "emergency?[openl position thru pneumatic PRV. System two-position damper remains in preset J50 onen noeltlon Jae SEE-QIHHIH I xhaust system loses run . will?? USE mg Disc?nnect power to local - command. ontacts remain closed,- run -- Exhaust system control contacts open, and system operates BAS control panel Semergegcy moge? I J-Sacgqum ypass amper me ates to prese iaimre cont. ergency (open) DDSIthin thru pneumatic PFIV. -- System Mo-posmon damper remains In preset at {Jugs-Tam exhaust system loses run command, fan contacts remain closed and fan continues to operate in "emergency" mode. System bypass damper modulates to preset "emergency"{open) position thru pneumatic PEN. AHU controller recognizes Exhaust systems status failure and de-energizes. Ftecord time for AHU 608 608 shutdown vs. EF controller failure. SIC mam: AHU, - I. at systems indicate Offline .. .. .. ,.stam.g.. System shutdown . . .. W32 '5 -- - ailed. System Shutdown .. .. .. . . . i 2 failed. ant adn arr-n - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. - Issue veritled resolved by cemmisslonlng agent. Havasst Page 140116 . .- . .- .. .. - -- .. '?wfifask? 34-. I. Digital-Test? .. .. - en is Pass. fall!? i333? .t a Ac nowledge alarm! alarm clears I306 605 Systems contimue to operate per safe egress 506 606 l_ a Reconnect power to local modes ?miAHUcentrol -c --T-ogglel Iinteriock to disablefenable. 305 5'35 HAS contra? The three exhausts stems and AHU follow normal module?power 606 606 4 iailure system enable sequences. a Elmowled alarm;r alarm clears Togglel'" interlock to disablez'enable. cos 608 Restart . Reconnect power to local 0 Exhaust systems de-energlze due to enable EF control panel command being removed. The three exhaust systems and AHU follow normal system enable sequences. Graphics indicate loss of communication with a I I nrr15_ In?: 42 i If stem status for exhaust Hats 53Disconnect bus 6 ates in safe egressconneehon to {?cat syStI-em gets loss of system '50 control panel status enr operates sale egress. I operates In safe egress. AHU. and all three exhaust systems indicate Offline BAS status module and safe egress mode 610 510 5 module? operation. Communication Graphics indicate loss of communication with . a I. tallure BAS alarr 5. Disconnect XTIXP bus fans and desenergizes. .mraua2 .s.c.?2szam~ I .. . . . connection to Exhaust 0 Isystem gets loss of AHU system 609 609 Lung.? lac mm} System Control Panel status and ooerates In sate egress. .s c. 5213mm? d' System Eats i055 0i AHU 5Y5tem 509 609 I . status an operates In safe egress. mild 42 -- . eta 1033 of 5 Stem Status and . 3' 509 see operates In safe egress. AHU, and all three exhaust systems indicate Oltline 1? status module and safe egress mode 609 609 operation. 0 - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. 1 I i - Issue verified resolved by commissioning agent. im'll'? 5'0? 2523"? Page 15 of 18 Ihn3142 Ihtl'E-ll2 I I 'iFUnetionaliz' Graphics-.32? Taste 'Test Parameter Action Veri?cation- Initial mite"--. ?ii-{95l- Pass: Fail . Pass Fail A. a AcknOt-rlerltgealarmf alarm clears NA NA NA System continue to operate per sale egress Reconnect XTIXP bus modes. 610 610 ?52? .. Quantizationth local AHM- linterlock to disablefenable. BAS control panel (3) Exhaust systems and AHU follow normal module - system start-up. 6 Communication systems are stable failure a Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears NA NA NA NA System continue to operate per sale egress Restart Reconnect XTIXP bus modes?L 609_ 339 3: we?? c? 'T'ogglel' llinterlock to disablefenable. control panel (3) Exhaust systems and AHU follow normal system start-up. systems are stable Safety Shutdown - Provide low limit a ailigtgjenergizes. "Temperature low limit? alarm 1 Low limit lemnga??rg?ilggown AHU and exhaust systems follow AHU failure Temperature startw'stop sequences. a Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears Manually reset low limit AHU and (3) exhaust systems follow normal start- Up procedure a AHU de-energizes. ?Low suction pressure" alarm Provide low suction static initiates 2 Low Suction pressure-raise setpoint AHU and exhaust systems follow AHU failure . startr?stop sequences. Siam Pressure Acknowled alarm.i alarm clears Manually reset Low static AHU 1 I pressure an )ex aus ems ow norma start up procedure - Issue said to be resolved byes ntractor. t! - Issue verified resolved by commissioning agent. ?2EEaihi HEVE ?ax - 354E Page 16 M18 . 'jFunctional'. :??asi-etaphtce ED Provide supply duct smoke initiates detector alarm-test switch AHU and (3) exhaust systems fellow AHU failure 3 supply Duct startistop sequences. Smoke Detector Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears Fieset Duct smoke detector AHU and (3) exhaust systems follow normal start- up procedure AHU remains On Provide zone fire alarm in 4 Zone Fire Alarm Exhaust systems remain ON zone associated With AHU EDITH-1 Um CT All systems operate in normal mode. OP?faii?""i if- AHU de-energizes per FOP command .351: AHU energizes per FOP command AHU energizes with zone fire alarm AHU energizes with duct smoke alarm AHU does not energize with pres. LL AHU energizes with temp LL Provide input frat? EDP AHU does not energize with pres. HL ?2523th I perates independently of AHU co mand. 'Wit? U-5 2523?? .. - - operates independently of AHU command. LIE. C. 262301 .. operates independently of AHU command. EF de-energizes per FOP command a eneroizes oer FOP command [hi?IBL-i2 U5 ?2E2ath operates independently of EF :12 532523[h me: 42 use. ff FOP command. operates independently of EF command. AHU operates independently of EF command - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. t. 3.42 . 2623 hi - Issue verified resolved by commissioning agent. 'i 3 Fs Page freer 39:95? .- vii rm?- ,i i i? [11 Pass: i-i??ailt; Fa?; itcgi? :?g-i-i-ii AHU de?energizesI "Fire alarm shutdown? alarm .- . - Functionatp BAS Graphics Task Test Parameter Action Verification Inliia' Test Hemm- lnma' Test Pass Fail Pass Fail a EF de-energizes per FOP command 4 WE in EF eneroizes oer FOP command more us ctg'g'e?2'?ti?ji" Provide starUstop input Operates IHdEPendenny or EF SW 5'2? r. from FOP comma? -- -- operates independently of EF command. AHU operates independently of EF command a EF de-energizes per FOP command 25 I EF eneroizes oer FOP command I w: ace Earazmm Frowde stamsmp Input Ioperates Independently of EF .- .- from FOP - i. -- -- perates independently of EF . command. AHU operates independently of EF command Fieturn all setpoints and parameters to normal. Ensure no alarms are present and system operates as found)" END OF TEST . ACTION Pie-Test Noresfliaiisc. Action items. iTEHai? {31.1% sesatta?h?ec-?rcr?aeer pie-scores i?T'sf?tf??etji?ess??iodfe?; 2 Ahu re-energized 15 seconds after power restored to control panel. 3 This is satisfactory per the designer. - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. - Issue verified resolved by commissioning agent. 42 LIED. Page 13 one g- . . U5. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE EUT UNCLASSIFIED (SEU) INFORM GM . . Ih; - see IMechanIcal was. Lest COMMISSIONING ACTION ITEM LIST 9 k. . I . t'rn CA DIangue 0 tr tar Comptetton Dates item .2 UnitTag Floor 13:11: . . . on 5-: DATE: Observation - De?ciency - Comment; DATE, Entity: Response - Action Taken Resolution Contractor CA Retest tot r. s-Ieos: . . ave incorrect so set point. see on has JGI: moo-s minute trends on J61 will. .. tilt-3E? 2525' 590 .JBI Exhaust and RAF report shows set point to be it)" GBA entered correctsel continue monitoring. (JCI requested that GBA not change set seems a 252mm- point on 3-16-05. but deiault value needs set to point if a change Is noticed - II1.- 3-22-05: The exhaust valve to I I: is actually L?ttat?tl. Both 591 . "In 3A5 text and graphto show valve as Change wontth to 150. compme ?agrant-?5 ?ngmm? IUWZUUS Flam la? 3-22-95: Only on the floor plan graphicI temperature I I .5192 Jill Vivarium '3 EM an are reversed. The pop?up windows show the correct temp Cdmpiete DBt29t2005 I) for the oorrect room. Floor. Ian 5- Only on the floor plan graphic, temperature l'orl'bI'G-t42 I 593 JCI Vivarium [a in: an are reversed. The pop*up windows show the correct temp Complete stzerzoos 10t4i2005 Etths wrr?tem- Flam 1a" 3-22-05: on the floor plan graphic. temperature an, I 594 JCI Vivarium an are reversed. The pop-op windows show the Correct temp Complete BIEQIZGUE omsrzoos 10Mf2005 for the correct room. - 3-22-05: Onty on the floor plan graphic. temperature to "mm? . I . . . Floor plan . . 595 JCI Vwarturn [a MC and are reversed. The pop-up windows show the correct temp Complete sperms DBIZQIZODS 131442005 9 for the correct room. a . mama use. 2623 595 JCI. Graphic Graph? page Heads to be [angled Complete srasrzoos- metastases amends - 5m. JCI Cuntmm 8-24-05: Damper tstays open one system disahie. All dampers . Flew should close. Apply to both tan pairs. 5-24-05: Verioones were found at 50% with both fans A B. 593 JBI 42 controls operating. When Raf set Up the AHU the cones are to operate at Toss 8-24-t?l5: JCI set cones to 70% during dual fart operation. Elt24t2005 ha? "3 OPEN- 2523'?? 3-24-05: On a system disable, both verioones should go to 0% open. Only tart A is going closed. Fan remains at THEE open. JCI 599 JCI controls redowntoaded UK at AHU and system worked ones or twtce. Later in Com plete 9!?!2005 the day after more failures due to testing. the cones did not work again. stayed open at ?t3l%. 3-24-05: an a fan failure to the AHU, A or or both fans. the FOP . . soo controls ore: is being initiated. Ir a single tan failure ensure. the other fan gaggle? MEWS '5 semen? ?gram? the Should remain on. _Dnca FOP OFF is initiatedI both fans rte-energize. 1 us. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (soul INFORMATION Note: All closed Items are hidden. Page 51 of 5a: nub?:- U3. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED - Roybal I- Mechanical w?m COMMISSIONING ACTION ITEM LIST Unit Tag Floor [0131142 SE. 262.3 Ill: Last it Item 5 it or 0 000.1 JGI i301 JCI 002 JCI 503 JG: E504 ens JCI 606 JCI 60? JCI 000 JCI one Dialogue ?o System CA contractor ompiet: n. ates 1 I. I. DATE: Observation - tilencrencn,r - Comment DATE, Entity: Response - Action Taken - Resolution Contractor CA Retest 3-24-05: On a fan failure to the AHU. A or or both fansI the FDP OFF ls being initiated. if a single fan failure occurs. the other fan comm? should remain on. IClose FOP initiated, both fans de-energize. 9-9405 QIQIZDUS magma FOP sequence was rem owed from 0-24-05: When both fans are failed to the AHU. the did not'go to 3-24.05: .101 found a loose wire in control cabinet looking out CUHIIDIS egress. All alarms were present at AHU screen and EF screen. a relay. Problem fixed. ERIQUUS BI24I2005 3-24-05: When both fans are failed to the AHU. the alarm reset should not bring the AHU back on. (only on a single fan failure) controls a dual failure the system should he Disabled, then Enabled to bring Sample?? ?man 05 magnum system back up on normal start Up. 0-24-05: When an EF is in sale egress. make lhe background blink Graphic red indicating a problem. Currently some badtgrounds are green, Complete 0E9i2005 00i29i2005 BR12005 some are red and some remain white. 9rd: Marcellus pulled the supply line oil theactuator and. plugged the end. Overrode EPT ornd manually to 20#. EFT 2 Position 21"??11: and intine analog gauge showed thatalr was Bypass kept cycling to make up lost air. Suggest running test poly 1orsr2oos ofthe other one we can not maintain SP set polnl. II dampers . - -- damper am manual? :15th Closed SF sat mm can be achieved irom actuator to EFT #2 stairway. Pilot posrttoner mounting was loose. tightened {update will be provided 9l14 Barn 91'21 Joy to do today 8-24415: On a single fan failure to an EF pair, we need to be able'to reset the failed tan with out disabling the system. Add the reset - wnImIs button to text and graphic. The reset should not work if both fans are comma?? amamun? gnmon? in alarm. 8-24-05: When the controller power was failed to the AHU, the EF's controls do not recognize the AHU egress mode. All Complete Bl29l2005 03.299005 Qil't2005 EF continued to maintain SP set point. 8-2405: On a communications failure to the N2 bus. the AHU did not controls receive a comm. alarm. 94,415: Same as 5492 Complete 05002005 DEBUJZUDE al.14rzoo5 0-24-05: On an EF controller power failure; the AHU stayed controls energlzed and went to egress mode. At the AHU page there Complete 00l29l2005 9m2005 was no Indication that the EF's were in safe egress. 3-24435: the IT bus was pulled from the EF's the AHU shut EF'dld . controls a 5 a? a 5 9? egress "we Complete oeesraoos antenna EF's go to egress. the indication at the AHU page should show in egress. Note: All closed items are hidden. U3. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) INFORMATION Page 52 of54 . us. GOVERNMENT ssusnwe sur UNCLASSIFIED Task Test Parameter Actlo Verification Func?onal BAS Graphics Initial Test Fte?Tsst Initial Test lite-Test chlUN HEM h' ACTION I'I'El'llHilI 2 cont. AHU Restart after failure cont. Re?energize supply tan- close disconnect Fan Acknowledge alarm.lr alarm clears Fan El is'indexed ON Gravin backdraft dampers open on fan D. Inlet cone on Fan returns from closed to two?fan operating postion. Inlet cone on Fan A returns from open to two-fan operating postion. 3H: Fan A decreases speed to maintain setpoint - static setpoint is adequately maintained during ramp. >6 Exhaust systems continue to operate in normal operation mode Exhaust systems are stable Supply air system stabilizes. AHU System Failure Fail AHLI See note #1 BAS indicates AHU failure. alarms AHU is indexed OFF LIE-.0. 2528 system controller recognizes AHU I failure and begins to operate in safe egress mode. Graphics indicate safe egress mode of operation clue to AHU oi". set 601 LLS C. 262a I h' system controller recognizes AHU failure and begins to operate in safe egress mode. Graphics indicate safe egress mode of operation rim:- tn off262:1th system controller recognmes AHU failure and begins to operate in safe egress mode. Graphics indicate safe egress-mode of operation due to AHU off. set 601 AHU Restart after System Failure Re-energize AH Acknowledgealarm! alarm clears System continue to operate per sate egress modes. 502 602 Toggl nterlock to disabletenable. (3) Exhaust systems and AHU follow normal system start-up. Exhaust systems are stable Supply air system is stable. - issue said to he rasotVed by contractor. - lssue veri?ed resolved by agent. U5. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SEW INFORMATION Ib}r3l 42 LI r15 262aih"- EFs Page 6 of1E . mam-Lupus.? ?hrs-unrem- ?why-immine- b}[3i242 US .. LLS. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) - issue verified resolved by commissioning agent. Functional BAS Graphics Task Test Parameter Action Verification Initial Test I Initial Test Re-Test Pass Fail ??og Pass Fail ?gm: 6 Safe Egress Operation?AHU OFF a 8A3 indicates AHU failure. alarms Create AHU failure to doLenergiZes 1 initiate Safe Egress A ?agposition bypass damper remains open. Mode Operation Modulatino pass damper opens 100% 2mm .. system indicates operating mode of safe egress-AHU failure a BAS indicates AHU failure. alarms continues to operate - Create AHU failure to tie-energizes g; iSEf?lE?g?jr?es?i initiate Safe Egress Two-position bxp'ass damper remains open. tl?l??e?i Operation Modulatinoypass damper opens 100% .. system indicates operating mode of safe ?f egress- failure a mg a BAS indicates AHU failure. alarms )t . . Create-AH-U failure-to- - - continues to operate I 3 I 50:: initiate Safe Egress oduiating bypass damperopens 100% . - - system indicates operating mode of safe . egress-AHU failure. AHU de-energizes prior to exhaust systems System . . enterin safe a rose 0 eration. 4 Characteristics Symem Chara?ensma AHU stgatio pregame dgclines prior to exhaUSt systems static pressure. IOFF . -- Cf?at? failure to energizes AHLL AHU Sate Egress . .. AHU shuts down priorto other exhaust systems 1 initiate Safe Egress . . Mode Operation going into sate egress mode. AHU indicates operating mode of safe egress 222M115 .. ?amp?I Iiailure, alarms 5? 2?:th .. .. .. '0 0 mate ""Createl lailure to e-energizes 2 Safe Egress initiate Safe Egress Two-position bypass damper remains open. Mode Operation Modulating bypass damper opens 100% Exhausts stem indicates operating mode of safe u.s. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT (sou; INFORMATION 0 - issue said to be resolved by contractor. ?3333312 use 232m; IREvaixlFs Page 7 of 1a US. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) INFORMATION Lawson. Robert From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 2:39 PM To: Mills-y. Stephen C. subject: is: gegress sate-mi Attachments: 123.1"; doc; FPT-LABI coc- ComthgIssuesDS-ZB-US.xls Thanks, Paul Probst mrDriginal Message-m- From: Fat Prendergast Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 2:20 PM To: Frohst, Paul E. Cc: Dan Abitz; Chad Baker Subject: RE: Safe egress Hey Paul- Attached is all we could come up with. Our report is in storage, and unfortunately, back then We did not do the reports in electronic format. have a call in to get it from storage, however that usually takes a few days. Notes: 1. we did test that system with a safe egress mode. 2. our testing procedure indicated that we recorded the space pressures, but I don't Itnow if it is in the report or not. if you have a copy look in the same area as that testing procedure in Volumes 2 and 3. 3 - has ?ii??t??i?siiei?r?i Eii??iif?it Ed h??f 4. we may not have recorded the pressures due to the fact that: a. there is no adjustment to the exhaust fans - so you get what you get with both bypass dampers open. In. the safe egress was put in as an additional safety measure. The only time it would he initiated is if BOTH Air handler supply fans failed. That would be a double or two failure scenario which is generally not accounted for in industry practice. mm. the HHS and Cos associated with itlitem 1 on the list]. i know that is not much but hope it helps. Pat Patrick A Prendergast, P. E. EBA ViroCon, Inc. pprendereast@ghateam.com direct: 816.842.4907 ext. 212 [office 816.842.9225 fax: 815.842.1138 [mohile: the issues list which indicates HE: Message?- U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSJTIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) INFORMATION LLS. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) INFORMATION From: F?rCIbstl Paul E. (CDCKOCOOXEIFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:20 PM To: Pat Prendergast Subject: Safe egress Pat: This only applies to the Vivarium area. Thanks, Paul 2 U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) INFORMATION US. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED JNFORMATION SYSTEM OPERATION CONSIDERATIONS LLSE USE: .1 2E2mh: 42 US Ci r} - The vari?cone position for new at 70% open for both fans. with both fans operating should be - The sari-cone position with only one fan operating should be 100% open for the operating fan and 0% open for the non-operating fan. [stray-42 Ll so. 27mm.- I 2. EF pairl If there is a single fan failure to either both bypass dampers must go fully closed in order to maintain static pressure set point. The sequence is so that the two position damper closes and the modulating damper shall modulate to maintain SP set point. If either of the bypass dampers is cracked open just the static pressure set point will not be able to be maintained. There has been an ongoing problem with the dampers not closing at 100% closed signal from the BAS. tu:t?:42 us cs 3. 252m" and Exhaust fan Interlocks If the AHU has both FAN A and FAN off in a failure alarm all associated exhaust fans will go into safe egress operation. If the AHU has only onefan failure all associated exhaust systems shall continue to operate under normal operating conditions. If both fans of either pair USE. 2528013 fail, the entire system will be disabled. The AHU will be indexed off prior to other exhaust Systems de4energizing. If a single fan failure occurs to one of the pairsl USE. ?2 323lhl [h system will continue to operate under normal operating conditions. 250mb:- has a fan failure, Ihil'3x42 LLS will be indexed OFF, and both 4. Safe Egress Operation LIES. 5 252801. iPaired fans exhaust fan pairs will be indexed to safe egress mode. i This 013113 .sz .ailt.s.tsr.9N 9ft- if'fh?? fan's 'arsin egress made) We U-S-C- U5. GOVERNMENT SENSINVE El UT UNC LASSIFIED (SBU) IN ON U3. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED (SBUJ INFORMATION tori-:42 LI 5 262th; safe egress operation is so that the bypass damper goes to 100% Open. S. AHU and EF Restart after a failure. - If any of the exhaust fans are in egress mode. the AHU should already be off. To re?Enable the system, the user must ?rst disable the system from the Interloeks point in the text mode. Wait for all systems statie pressure to drop to Clear any alarms present, then Enable the Interlocks point from text mode. 2923's? - If there is a single fan failure to the AHU or a single fan failure to either of the paired exhaust fans the alarm can be cleared without disabling the system. Simply reset the alarm from either the text or graphics to ON and then to OFF again. The failed fan will be reset and come back on without interruption to the system. (lf?ill'failures E'?d?i?tE'i'l?'?IEs and rwere notiftTrEiih?ing: as 3. Ex: GBA noticed the AHU was ON and maintaining SP set point, but all exhaust fan systems were in Egress mode. This should never happen. U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION w. hr? ?eh Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control Va Memorandum U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED (SBU) INFORMATION Date: 2? July 2012 ibu3'r42 use ?2?2alhz - Subject: Level, Exhaust Fans Safe Egress (2005 Commissioning) Pages: Three USE $3113.14? s262a-m ful?ls? US 2523'? Level of block contains a vivarium 125m" US I I 252cm: construction and commissioning of the Vivarium spaces on the - lary of records related to the iThis Memorandum f; ,l This summaryis intended to address the issue of whether air?ow across doors in the vivarium spaces, as well as the related issue of pull-force required to open the doors, was in compliance with design intent at the conclusion of the commissioning proce 112L15le 2432mm is I Handling _Unit, of understanding, the speci?c equipment serving the Vivarium space and Exhaust ansI LI 5 C- 1} ?62m; is structured as a narrative tim?eline of events surrounding these issues. Supporting documents with relevant sections highlighted, are attached. :12 US :3 5 252mb. - ivarium BF Bypass Dampers?, by Paul mechanical engineer: Item 1 In 2005, the contractor (McCarthy), requested clari?cation from the architect?engineer (CUH2A) on pressurization of Spaces as it relates to various scenarios that are planned for. That clari?cation lead to changes in the work before the building opened to properly resolve the outstanding issue to allow for safe egress from the facili . McCarthy Request for Information (RFD 1319- The. submitted a re nest for clarification regarding the sequence of operations for exhaust fans serving the I trilli?ii2 2528??: response The AJE issued a detailed response that gave direction on what should occur under the hypothetical scenario where both fans of the supply air handling unit fail resulting in the intended situation where one fan of the exhaust fan pair set continues to operate to maintain negative air ?ow. Their response included: ?Desired setpoint shall be selected allow building air to be drawn thru and exhausted from the building without over 'pressurizing egress of personnel from the affected areas?; 0 Attachment: Transmittal (l 1 page, with RH 1319 . 'Dirs'izu'sl'i Weekly Commissioning Issues Update Status? (dated ESJUNZEUUS), Item 1, 25m?- outlines the corrective action taken over several months to address the bypass damper issue, in response to actions resulting from direction above: 0 Damper pricing issued Dampers orderedfarrive (1 Dampers ready for Cx Dampers installed Issue reopened (l 0000 US. GOVERNNLENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED (SBU) U5. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED (SBU) INFORMATION I NOTE: The issue was reopened in May, but the reason is not given in the above document. Based on McCarthy?s RFI 1334 (below), it was reopened because the initial did not achieve the anticipated result and another solution had to be developed; 0 Attachment: 091UL2012 2:39 PM Email from Pat Prendergast to Paul Probst with comment highlighted explaining what the Commissioning Issues Update refers to, 2 pages; ?Bldg. Weekly Commissioning Issues Update Status 6123(2005?, 5 pages; 0 Doors and testing proposal: 0 CUT-12A Doors (ZQMOOS): I The A113 developed a list of Building doors and testing procedures for status pressure tests under an air handling unit (AHU) failure scenario. This was supplemental work to the contract and this allowed the additional work to be priced; Research Air Flo, Inc, the test and balance agency, sent an email with attachments (3 005'), in response to a ?Request for Proposal? to do the testing; 0 Attachment: 30W005 email from Kevin Derrick to Jason Roberts, 1 page; with CUH2A door list, 1 page; and Research Air Flo cost preposal, 3 pageS; - McCarthy RFI 1334 (03May2005), Exhaust Fan Pair Bypass Damper Issues". Contractor?s statements include ?we will never be able to achieve an egress setpoint during a failure of an AHU or another exhaust fan pair? and ?we suspect the same problem will exist for exhaust fan pairl muss-42 sc ?2523 hi NOTE: The statement ?never be able to achieve? likely means they could not achieve it with the design that was currently planned; 0 AXE Response (16MAY2005) by Pedro Pacheco of CUHZZA in part notes a new damper should be provided and the damper should be set to full open; 0 Atta I. t: 17May2005 Transmittal to Paul Matting from Angelle Cannion with RH 1334 2 pages; I - McCarthy RFI 1334 (03May2005), is reissued on 17MAY2005 with an ?Insuf?cient Response Notice? stamp alter second bypass damper is installed per NOTE: This is the same RF I received earlier.; 0 Attachment: 31May2005 Transmittal to Jason Roberts from Angella Cannion with RH 1334 ?Insu?icient Res sense Notice?, 2 pages; a CUHZA Change revision 1 (23May2005): The AIE requests an itemized proposal from the contractor for a new change related to the exhaust fans, because the earlier action did not result in pressurization that allowed code-complaint egress; 0 Attachment: 23Ma - smittal to Eddie Harris from Angelle Cannion with Change Bulletin 262m rev 1, 2 paeS' 26MAY20505 to RH 1334 its-if. reissued on 17MAY2005). After i53uanee (revision 1), Pedro Pacheco of CUHZA says to discard his l?Mav2005 response to RFI 1334M (03May2005). He say to follow CB (revision 1) dated 23May2005; Atta me it: 31May2005 Transmittal to Jason Roberts ?om Angella Cannion with RFI 1334- ?Insuf?cient Response Notice?, 2 pages; - McCarthy received CB revision 1. The contractor then responded with a revised price for the work, which is documented in acceptance of PCO 404 (revision U.S. GOVERNDENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED (SBU) INFORLIATION Attachment: ESJUNZOUS email from Randy Hutsell to CDC with 27IUN2005 CUHEA recommendation to accept the contractor?s price of (2 pages); a After repetitive issuance of construction modi?cations, action was taken to address the issue of safe egress during a dual failure supply fan scenario. The documentation is as follows: George Butler Associates (GBA) ?Functional Performance Test? (AUG2005), ?Air Handling Unit Failure Starthtop Sequences?, Item 3d (page 6 of 18): I The ?Action? column references ?Note 1? on page 18 of 18. Note 1 states ?see attached for door pressures in safe egress mode?. Although the attachment cannot. be found in 2012, the commissioning report accepted the building and it can be deduced that a failure mode test to determine safe egress was successful; I Items 2 and 4 (page 7 of 18) have further descriptions of the continued testing of that failure scenario reporting of the successful test; I Attachments: GBA ?Functional Perfonnane= Test? see names and 18; and CDC Roybal Campus (Commissioning Action Item List)? Mechanical (11-3-05), Comment 601, 4 pages; I END OF NARRATIVE SEQUENCE Conclusion: The conunissioning agent for Building discovered as a part of the normal evaluation process a scenario of both fans of the air handling unit could negatively impact safe egress from the .eve]. Remedial action was recommended, but it did not initially solve the problem. Further action was taken that solved the problem. 'is only in -b:r3]:42 252.3ch during Any changes made did; their. res?ng on various building" components is not with the 'scope {if-the above narrative. For example; Operatioii Considerations?; page note 23; states-that the interlocks as tested. (Attachmenti 21:3 JUN-2012 ssm?ssissiilsi Tag-ran?? "m a:er issus .w to Public Health Service ??lm 0&1? Centers for Disease Control s? DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and Preventinn (CDC) DI Memorandum US. SENSITIVE BUT WCLASSIFED (SBU) INFORMATION Date: 27 July 2012 [has 42 US c: .. . .. Exhaust Fans Egress Comm15310mg) Pages: Three . 25,231.25 5 . . IVlva?UIn EmuThis Memorandum is a sum arv of records related construction and of the vivarrum spaces on m: This summary is intended to address the issue of whether air?ow across doors in the vivarium spaces, as well as the related issue of pull?force required to open the doors, was in compliance with design intent at the conclusion of the commissioning process. For sake of understanding, the speci?c equipment serving the Vivarium space is Air Handling Unit '3 i -: Exhaust Fans Fbi'r'gl'lizu?sc'i252ar?h: l. The following sununary is structured as a narrative timeline of events surrounding those issues. Supporting documents with relevant sectiOns highlighted, are attached. I In 2005, the contractor (McCarthy), requested clari?cation from the architectfengineer (CUT-12A) on pressurization of spaces as it relates to various scenarios that are planned for. That clari?cation lead to changes in the work before the building opened to properly resolve the outstanding issue to allow for safe egress from the facili . McCarthy Request for Information (RPI) 't?i'iwsc (OBFEBZOOS): The contractor submitted a request for clari?cation regarding the sequence of operations for exhaust falls sawing the Irh}:3r42 252mb. I response (I 1FEB2005): The A113 issued a detailed response that gave direction on what should occur under the hypothetical scenario where both fans of the supply air handling unit fail resulting in the intended situation where one fan of the exhaust fan pair set continues to operate to maintain negative air ?ow. Their response included: ?Desired setpoint shall be selected allow building air to be drawn thru and exhausted from the building without ever pressurizing egress of personnel from the affected areas?; . 0 Attachment: Transmittal (1 1 page, with RFI 2 pages; it?: Weekly Commissioning Issues Update Status? (dated 28JUN2005), Item 1, 2623's . n- ivariurn EF Bypass Dampers?, by Paul ProhsthIMO mechanical engineer: Item 1 outlines the corrective action taken over several months to address the bypass damper issue, in response to actions resulting from IFEB2OOS direction above: 0 Damper pricing issued (1 Dampers orderedfarrive Dampers ready for Cu Dampers installed Issue reopened 0000 U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED :34: use a U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) INFORMATION NOTE: The issue was reopened in May, but the is not given in the above document. Based on McCarthy?s RH 133 (below), it was reopened because the initial ?fix? did not achieve the anticipated result and another solution had to be deveIOped; 0 Attachment: UQIULZOIZ 2:39 PM Email from Pat Prendergast to Paul Probst with comment highli ted explaining what the Commissioning Issues Update refers to, 2 pages; ?Bldg. eekiy Commissioning Issues Update Status 6f23f2005?, 5 pages; Doors and testing proposal: I CUHEA Doors (29 The developed a list of Building oors and testing procedures for status pressure tests under an air handling unit (AHU) failure scenario. This was supplemental work to the contract and this allowed the additional work to be priced; 0 Research Air Flo, Inc., the test and balance agency, sent an email with attachment; (3 0MAR2005), in response to a ?Request for Proposal? to do the testing; 0 Attachment: 30MAR2005 email from Kevin Derrick to Jason Roberts, 1 page; with CUHZA door list, 1 page; and Research Air Flo cost proposal, 3 pages; McCarthy art 1334 (03May2005), Exhaust Fan Pair Bypass Damper Issues?. Contractor?s statements include ?we will never be able to achieve an egress setpoint during a failure of an AHU or another exhaust fan pair? and ?we suspect the same problem will exist for exhaust fan pairl loss} I. NOTE: The statement ?never be able to achieve? likely means they could not achieve it with the-design that was currently planned; 0 AE Response (16MAY2005) by Pedro Pacheco of CUT-12A in part notes a new damper should be provided and the damper should be set to full open; oAtta 1334 [sf-is Meceiaiy RFI 1334 (03May2005), is reissued on 17MAY2005 with an Response No is the same RFI received earlier.; Attachment: 31May2005 Transmittal to Jason Roberts ?'om Angelle Cannion with RF I CUH2A Change Bulletin preposal from the contractor for a new change related to the exhaust fans, because the earlier action did not result in pressurization that allowed code-complaint egress; 0 Attachment: 23Ma3 Change Bulletin CB ALE at: 17May2005 Transmittal to Paul Marting from Angella Cannion with RFI 2 pages; ?Insufficient - '4 NOTE: This tice? stamp after second bypass damper is installed per CB Reaponse Notice?, 2 pages; -161 revision 1 (23May2005): The AJE requests an itemized 3 Transmittal to Eddie Harris from Angella Cannion with 161 rev 1, 2 lugpsi ed on 26MAY20505 to RH 1334 reissued on A?er issuance USE. 0f Daren-F. 23May2005; Attacl -161 (revision 1), Pedro Pacheco of CUE-12A says response to RFI 1334 He say to follow CB 5??9r-nl1? iscard his 16May2005 -161 (revision 1) dated 1113611: 31May2005 Transmittal to Jason Roberts from Angella Cannion with RFI 1334- 6::42 ?Insuf?cient Response Notice?, 2 pages; McCarthy received CB161 revision 1. The contractor then responded with a revised price for the work, which is documented in acceptance of PCO 404 (revision US. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED (SBU) INFORIVLATION Attachment: 28JUN2005 email from Randy Hutsell to ?I'll? w?th ZTIUNZOOS CUHZA recommendation to accept the contractor?s price of (2 pages); in After repetitive issuance of construction modi?cations, action was taken to address the issue of safe egress during a dual failure supply fan scenario. The documentation is as follows: George Butler Associates (GBA) ?Functional Performance Test? (AUGZOUS), ?Air Handling Unit Failure Starthtop Sequences?, Item 3d (page 6 of 18): I The ?Action? column references ?Note 1? on page 18 of 18. Note 1 states ?see attached for door pressures in safe egress mode?- Although the attachment cannot be found in 2012, the commissioning report accepted the building and it can be deduced that a failure mode test to determine safe egress was successful; I Items 2 and 4 (page of 18) have further descriptions of the continued testing of that failure scenario repertng of the success?ll test; I I Attachments: GBA ?Functional Performan Test? AUGQOOS. see pages and 18; and CDC Roybal Campus Ibl-fEI-llE use. szeaam. (Commissioning Action Item List)? Mechanical (11-3-05), Comment 601, 4 Pages; I END OFNARRATIVE SEQUENCE Conclusion: The commissioning agent for Buildin discovered as a part of the normal evaluation process a scenario where the Failure nt? bn'h fans of the air handling unit could negatively impact safe egress from the ?"342 Remedial action was recommended, but it did not initially solve the problem. Further action was taken that solved the problem. [El has: NOTE: This 6515i Hinregard-to-the isSue in ilfe 353-3511.? lEvel-of 616E115 shortly before ?Elia during commissioning by GBA. Any changes made after- GBA. their teating- on various building components is not'nrith the scope of the above narrative. {For ?Systems Operation Considerjatior1s?'a page 2.. factor states that the interlocks were not timelidning as tested, (Attachments: Paul. ii pages); this aha trashed during barmasisaiaa. 29.12.. Energise? Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCTOCODIEIFD) Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:04 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Howard, William (Bill) Us Jue, Bruce R. (cocrocooraFO) 3? Subject: RE: Results of Door Testing in anrium AE Conversation {Todd Queary of yields that this is not an egress door, and reversing door is not necessary. Thanks, Paul Probst From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 ?:49 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) ibiiEHE Subject: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium 252mm door test2.pdf door test1.pdf - - -. its of the door pressure testing for egress in the vivarium accomplished on July 24, 2012 are as follows: North Entry Doorto North Stair #3 failed. A power assisted door operator will be installed on this door to overcome the force of the stair pressurization fan during egress. Eggs? Clean corridorto LC Stair failed. A power assisted door operator will be installed on this door to overcome the force of the stair pressurization fan during egress. Egg: South Entry to Clean Corridor failed. Cardkey looking mechanism will be changed out. Contact AE of record to determine if door was intended as egress door. Investigate possibility of reversing door swing to coincide with egress path out of clean corridor to southeast from Vivarium space. All other doors tested passed, 262ml? Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404?539?1573 FAN FAILURE [No Building Fire?Alerrn, AHU Off; EF Minimum, Stair Pressurizetion Off] - North Entry to North Stair #3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.2 ?[33:42 - De-Con Room to North Entry Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.13 ?113242 . 252 - Clean Corridor to-North Entry estz Test 1 - Clean Corridor to LC Stair Test 1 Test 2 Test ."33 -. 1? DP 15 Clean Cage to Clean Vestib'ule I Test 1 Test 2 Test '3 15 5 15 so 12$3514: Clean Vestibuie to South Entry Test 1 Test 2 Test -0.15 - South Entry to LC Tower Test 1 Test '2 Test 4-0.23 - South Entry to Clean Corridor Test 1 Test 2 Test43.23 GENERAL FIRE ALRRM WLTH AHU SHUTDOWN {Bldg FA, AHU Off, EF Minimum, Stair Press. 011) - North Entry to North Stair #3 - Clean Cage to Ctean Vestibule Test 1 Test 2- Test Test 2 Test 3 15 L115 {1De-Con Room to North 25231 - Clean Ves?tibule to South Entry Test 1 Test 2. est 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test ?o.15 . - South Entry to LC Tower est 1 Test 2 est 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.15 - Clean-Corridor to LC Stair i - - South Entry to Clean Corridor Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test .540 - ssc{1.55 DP Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIDCDDIBFD) Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11 :19 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO 'Waole Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) Jue, Bruce R. Co: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium So the only item we need to do on this door is to change the lock type. i'll put the W0 in. Thanks, Ken Bowen - Director for Facilities Engineering Office 464-639-3303 Office 404?639?0499 Fax From: Probst, Paui Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:04 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Ra mond Geore Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) Jue, Bruce Subject: RE: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium AE Conversation (Todd Queary of yields that this is not an egress door, and reversing door is not necessary. Thanks, Paul Probst From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 2:49 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Ra mond Geore Walpole, Kenneth K. (cocrocooxsro); Howard, William (Bill) {cocrocoorosnsy (CDCIOCODIOSHE) Subject: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium File: door test2.pdf File: door test1.pdf The results of the door pressure testing for egress in the vivarium accomplished on July 24, 2012 are as follows: i2North Entry Door to North Stair #3 failed. A power assisted door operator will be installed On this door to overcome the force of the stair pressurization fan during egress. - Clean Corridor to L0 Stair failed. A power assisted door operator will be installed on this door to overcome the force of the stair pressurization fan during egress. [one :12 E?zalhi South Entry.' to Clean Corridor faiied. Cardkey locking mechanism will be changed out. Contact AE of record to determine if door was intended as egress door. Investigate possibility of reversing door swing to coincide with egress path out of clean corridor to southeast entryi'exit from Vivarium space. All other doors tested passed. Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639-15?3 Mathe, Chester (CDCIDCOOIOSEPI From: Bowen. Ken L. Sent: Tuesday, July 24. 2012 8:00 AM To: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) - Cc: Williams, Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Probst, Paul E. Subject: FW: Results of ?oor Testing in Vivarium Here are the results from this morning tests and the solution to ?x it. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director-for Facilities Engineering Office 404-639?3303 Office 404-639-0499 Fax From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCIGCODJBFO) I. Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 7:49 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Ra mond Geo Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) (CDQOCOOIOSHE) Subject: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium door test2.pdf door test].de a I - Its of the door pressure testing for egress in the vivarium accomplished on July 24, 2012 are as follows: North Entry Door to North Stair #3 failed. A power assisted door operator will be installed on this door to overcome the force of the stair pressurization fan during egress. 888224.1- Clean Corridor to L0 Stair failed. A power assisted door operator will be installed on this door to overcome the lb?have stair pressurization fan during egress. 2623's.: South Entry to Clean Corridor failed. Cardkey locking mechanism will be changed out. Contact AE of record to determine if door was intended as egress door. Investigate possibility of reversing door swing to coincide with egress path out of clean corridor to southeast from Vivarium space. All other doors tested passed. Steven Powell FMECI Building Manager 404-639-1573 US 252mm US 0 252ail1: ?19:33:42 USE. 262mm AHU DUAL FAN FAILURE (Na Building Fireh?larrtl, AHU Off, EF Minimum, Stair Pressurizatiun Off] to Nerth Stsir #Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 15 5 5 2.5 30 1241.02 262all1: ?I:l De?Cen Re em to North Entr',l '-Clean-Vest-ibulesten-South. Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.13 DP .. Ciean Corridor to North Entry Test 1 Test 2 I Test 3 Test 1 est 2 Test 15135? "?11 ?'13 "3 10 12 DP 0.15 DP - Clean Corridor to LC Stair - South-Entry. totlean .Cerridet. Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.37 DP 41.23 . 25 231 :11sz ?242 US .. .. .. hs' GENERAL FIRE ALARM WITH AHU SHUTDOWN [Bldg FA, AHU Off, EF Minimum, Stair Press. On] $51313? ??135? North Entry to? North Stair #3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.42 De-Cun Room to North Entry - Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.13 3361:1822 US C. 3 Clean Corridor to NurthEntry Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 15 6 5 5 30 U115 0.15 mean-Corridor to LC Stair est 1 351:2 Test Test 1 Test 2' Test 42.015 w-{E-leari Mestihule to..Seuth EDIE. Test 1 Test 2 Test 1.0. 10 11' - up 4115 Tegt 1 Test 2 Test 3 1515s 1115 Clean Carl-1:19! Test 1 Test 2 Test 43.27- DP .bf-iBHE USE. ?25.2.3111: . US 0 . .. Ib}[3}242 Ll . "1252:? 2.5.2.3311]; .. . Mathe, Chester From: Lawson, Robert Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 6:5? PM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Milby, Stephen C. Raymond, George Whatley, Marcus E. . Safe Egress (Vivarium, Attachments: Vivarium Egress reviQJUL2012.doc Paul: Attached is theedited document through our edit session that ended at 7' pm Thursday. We will pick up the edit next week with the aqua and yellow highlights, and the conclusion. (I am off Friday and you are off Mondast Regards, Bob Lawson, Architect DID Project Manager Capital improvements Management Of?ce U.S. Centers For Disease Control at Prevention =This email and any attachments contain US. Government SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION requiring Special handling safeguards to protect against unauthorized disclosure. All information is considered pertinent-to the national interests of the-U5. Government and is intended solely!r for the addressee. Please visit BFG Customer Satisfag?gg ?grve}: and tell us about your recent experiences with BFO. J, when.? Public Health Service s3 k? Camera for Disease Control 5- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and Hemp-an i '3 Memorandum as com BUT UNCLASSIFED (sat!) mom-mum Date: 19 July 2012 DRAFT T01 Jeff Williams, BFO Deputy Director From: Bob Lawson. Architect, [Dari 113 US I: ?1 . . Squgctg. I -- IExhaust Fans 35 Safe Egress (2005 Commissioning) Pages: Three 4 I . - mm. d1 rosette use. r: lvwarium @3593?? editing - -- I This Menidrandum is a summary of records related to the gag] at; This summary,?r is intended to address the issue of whether airflow across doors in tl?ietsj?iariumspaces, as well as the related issue of pull?force required to open the doors, was in compliancee?ithfdesign intent at the conclusion of the commissioning process. The following summary is suuchire'dkas a narrative timeline of events surrounding those issues. Supporting documents with relevant sections highlighted, are attached. - In 2005, the contractor (McCarthy), requested from the arehitectfenginoer (GUI-12A) on pressurization of spaces as it relates to various scenarios that are planned for. 'That clari?catinn?lcadto changes in the work before the building opened to properly resolve tlJI-iS A: US 5 Ihh?B: :12 US E?Eatlt (I: 5 - FhEhz?i?ih use 252m: the for safe egresst'rom the facilit . (it! fms..se?dn?.dhe contractor for exhaust tasty (anemone): The The AIE issued a detailed response that gave direction on the hypothetical scenario where both fans supply air fatl resulting 1n the intended sItuatton where one fan of the exhaust fan pair setteontinpes to operate to maintain negative air ?ow . . hearted. Their ?Desired sctpoint shall be selected allow building air to be drawn thru arid exhausted from the building without over pressurizing egress of personnel from the affected areas?; 3 pages; 9 Weekly,r Commissioning Issues Update Status? (dated ZSHIMZUUSJ, Item I, ivariutn BF Bypass Dampers?, by Paul mechanical engineer: item I outlines the corrective action taken over several months to address the bypass damper issue, in response to actions resulting from direction above: 0 0000 Damper pricing issued (1 Dampers orderediarri V6 (i Dampers ready for Cx Dampers installed (I issue reopened US. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED (SBU) 3. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT (SEU) NOTE: The issue was reopened in May, but the reason is not given in the above document. Based on McCarthy?s RFI 133 (below), it was reopened because the initial did not achieve the antlcipated result and another solution had to be developed; 0 Attachment: UQJUL2012 2:39 PM Email from Pat Prendergast to Paul Probst with I'hted explaining what the Commissioning Issues Update refers to, 2 pages; ?Bld - Weeklyr Commissioning Issues Update Status 612332905?, 5 pages; I Doors and testing proposal: GUI-12A Doors (29 tag" . The AIE developed a list of Building po?rkzan?d testing procedures for status pressure tests under an air handling scenario. This was supplemental work to the contract andittljis allowed-lithe additional work to be priced; a. Research Air Flo, Inc.._ the test and balance agency; sent ani'iiniail with attachments (BUMAREGOS), in response to a ?Request for Proposal? to do the 0 Attachment: SOMARZDUS email from Kevin Derrick to Jason Rodenj?s?tl page; with CID-12A door . page; and Research Air Flo cost proposal, 3 pagesgi McCarthy err 133 Exhaust Fan Pair Bypass Damper Issues". Contractor?s statements includegwe will never be able to achieve an egress setpoint during a failure of an AHU or another pair? and ?we suspect the same problem will exist for exhaust fan pal - 7 rThe statement ?never be able to achieve" likely means they could not achieve it was planned; AVE Response (1 in part notes a new damper. should he provided and the dar?ispps??uld 5e fo??tll open; Atta ur t: 17May2005 to Paul warlng from Angelle Cannion with RH 133 2 aes; - McCarthy RFI 133 on ITMAYZUUS with an ?Insufficient Response Notice" stamp after second is installed per CB 313L161. NOTE: This is the satire RH received earlier. In addition to the new ?Insuf?cient Response Notice"; mo. ?it: 31May2ti?? Transmittal to Jason Roberts from Angelle Cannion with RF I Response Notice?; 2 pages; Chaii" Bulletinldl revision 1 (23May3005): The AIF. requests an itemized a? proposal from the; :ptractor for a new change related to the exhaust fans: because the earlier ?Haciion did not resulti'iripressurization that allowed code-complaint egress; WAttachment?g?a?Ma Transmittal to Eddie Harris from Angelle Cannion with a 'i?th?ng-e Bullggin 61 rev 1, 2 pages es ended to RFI 133 (reissued on After i55uance 1), Pedro Pacheco of CUIIZA says to discard his I6May2005 gsponse to $131 133 He say to follow CBIGI (revision 1) dated MaylellS'; . t: 31May2005 Transmittal to Jason Roberts from Angelle. Cannion with RFI 133 - .334 ?Insuf?cient Response Notice?, 2 pages; I McCarthy received CB I61 revision 1. The contractor then responded with a revised price for the world which 15 - ocuniented in acceptance of FCC 4M (revision DJ ILli U5. GOVERNMENT SENSIHVEBUT UNCLASSEFED Attachment. email From Randy Ilutsell to CDC with ZTJUNZDM CUHEA recommendation to accept the contractor?s price 0 (2 oases); - Action was taken, which resulted in safe egress during a dual failure supply fart scenario. The documentation is as follows: awaits-laid isSuefd'esct-l" titties); emergent? dial-?Elia do- r- -. :ue' -- '1 - .r any. -- . it It'- dear-in . ;3'3 t?ief't?js. amatnsiemlfzappeii?- to: 'e a swarm mil- 6 reference 1} . .. t-e-r- -- -.. a. left-ta: i iv ?In wet-swat- .-.1 .- - - - Std" '?GeorgeuB'u?er. Associates handling li.? nit Failinc ?oflih's'j; metres: failed and then-retested: .. '1 'R'etes'ting' includes ?t3?5 stating that issue: ?tassto 'bei resolved-w issue was verified resolved by the-commissioning agents Even i?t?no ZZJULEOGS report was not rate - the: - block? this Attachment: GB s'ttsunetienel Performance-Tesejauo as tee-pages ens; Operation Consideration? (at the labeled 7% Safe Egress ?Mhde paragraph,.2 pages; UQJULEUIZ Email. from PatPrender ast to 2 pages; and Royhal Camp lb I3-142 5?0 ?2?2aln- - END oF namrwsas?soosncs my commissioning agent for BuildingEldiscovere-d as a part of the normal evaluation process a - so Conclusion: mcould negatively impact ?25231h Remedial action was recommended, but it did not initially solve the pro )lem. Further action was taken that solved the problem. (It was likely resolved as noted in the ?Fire and Life Safety Commissioning Report? Item 83 I (ZHULZDUSL assuming the ?low containment" also a lied to the vivariurn saces in th Block vivariurn exhaust was resolved by August, 2005, because this is explicitly noted by GBA in their AUGUS Functional Performance Test.) NOTE: This memo is only in regard to the exhaust issue in the sso level of the block shortly before and during commissioning by GBA. It did not investigate the low containment lab building to i?Ear?Itteot??etieel?seenario where the the failure of both Format-ted: Strikemmugh US. GOVERNLENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLAS SIFED INFORLLNIION see if there was a secnnd issue involving the ZGJULECIDS report, since that was outside the de?ned scope of work for this memo. Also any changes made after GEM. did their testing on various building components is not re?ected in the abnve Attachments: J. Public Healm?em?ce 1 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES C. Memorandum us GOVERNMENT sausm vsauT uncenssusu (SBU) on Date: 15' July ZUIZDRAFT T05 Jet? Williams. BFO Deputy Director From: Bob Lawson. Architect, CDCEDCOOIBFOKCEHO IJEguhiect; - - I Exhaust Fans 35 Safari?'43ng (2005 Commissioning} it}. Eli?s. {ii-it Pages: Three mg :12 C: ?t I'blt'E 1:13 Ll SJ: -- in?? 42' 5 IThis Mentor of to the cesarand commissioningof the .vtvartum spaces a 252mm I?his summary-is intended to address the issue of whether atr?ow across doors to the vivartum spaces, as well as the related of pullhforce required to open the doors= was in compliance with design intent at the conclusion of" the commissioning process. The followirtggummary is structured as a narrative timeline of events surrounding those issues. Supporting do?hitents Ll I: E. assent,- 412 5 CE s_ Flag-39:12 use - LIB a; 262mm. gas. In 2005, the contractor (McCar?ixJ, with relevant sections highlighted. are attached. clari?cation from the architecttengineer 12A) on pressurization of spaces. as it scenarios that are planned for. That clari?cation lead to changes in {hangars-fit hefo?resthfihuilding opened to properly resolve the outstanding issue to allow for safe from th i (RFD (U3FEBZOUS): The contractor 91s:- submitted a re uest for clari?cano 5. .. response (1 an. ?roof the affected areas?; *5 as: 3 pages; I iWeekly-?E-ommissioning Issues Update Status? (dated ZRIUNZUHS). item 1, ardin the se uence of rations for exhaust The issued a detailed response that gave on what should occur under the hypothetical scenario where both fans of the stra?ng;ng handling unit fail resulting in the intended situation where one fan of the exhaudttl'd??pair set continues to operate to maintain negative air ?ow apairefexhaast response included: ?Desired setpnint shall he selected allow building air to be dihdh thru and exhausted from the building without ever pressurizittg egress iviarjipin-"F Bypass Dampers?, by Paul mechanical engineer: Item 1 outlines the gorrective action taken over several months to address the bypass damper issue, in response to ahtions resulting from CUI Hat?s I IFEBZDUS direction above: Damper pricing issued (1 Dampers orderedfarrive (l Dampers ready for Cx Dampers installed If I Issue reopened 0000 US GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED INFORMATION NOTE: The issue Was reopened in May, but the reason is not given in the above document. Based on McCarthy?s RH 133 (below), it was reopened because the initial ?fix? did not achieve the anticipated result and another solution had to be developed; 0 Attachment: {1911112012 2:39 PM Email from Fat Prendergast to Paul Prohst with comment highlighted explaining what the Commissioning Issues Update refers to, 2 pages; ?Bldg Weekly Commissioning Issues Update Status 61?2812005", 5 pages; - Doors and testing proposal: CUHZA Doors (ZQWDOS): I The AIE developed a list of Building doors and testing procedures for status pressure tests under an air handling unit (AHU) failure scenario. This was supplemental-work to the contract and this allowed the additional work to be priced; 0 Research Air Flo, lne., the test and halahce agency, sent an email with attachments (WMAREGOS), inresponse to a ?Requfejsyt for Proposal? to do the testing; 0 Attachment: SOMARZUDS emails?iom'i?evin Deiiriclt to Jason Roberts, 1 page; with CUHZA door list, 1 page; and edsi?rgposal, 3 pages; - McCarthy art 1334(03May2005), Fan Pair Bypass Damper Issues?. Contractor?s statements include ?we will never be achieve an egress setpoitlt during a failure of an AHU or another exhaust fan pair? and ?w??S?Ehect the same problem will exist for exhaust fan pai into-:42 sc. a math NOTE: The be able to achieve? liker means they could not achieve it with the design that was currh?tlf planned; Response (1 EMAYEUOSJ by Pedro Pacheco of in part notes a new damper should be _r,pgiged and the damper should he set to full open; 0 Attachments-ljl?ilaym?? Transmittal to Paul Matting from Angelle Cannion with RFI 1331:. page; . is reissued on with an ?Insufficient Response bypass damper is installed per CB 161. NOTE: This is the same the new ?Insuf?cient Response Notice?; to Jason Roberts from Angelle Cannion with RFI lBSdE?Tnsu?-?ii?iient Etesponse Notice", 2 pages; 0 CUT-12A Change Bulletin '7 .161 revision 1 (23May2t?ll?l5): The AXE requests an itemized proposal from the oontractoti?tfpii'ia new change related to the exhaust fans, because the earlier action did not result in pressui'ization that alloWed code-complaint egress; 0 Attachment: 23Ma .It Transmittal to Eddie Ham's from Angelle Cannion with Change Bulletin CB 161 rev 1, 2 pages - AXE Re ended on 26MAY20505 to RFI 133m (reissued on After issuance of 161 (rev Pedro Pacheco of CUT-TEA says to discard his response to RFI 1331 i3 :42 (U3May2005). He sa}r to follow (revision 1] dated 23May2005; Attachment: TranSmittal to Jason Roberts from Angelle Cannion with RFI 133m ?Insu -- tResponse Notice", 2 pages; a McCarthy received 161 revision 1. The contractor then responded with a revised price for the work, which is documented in acceptance of PEG 404 {revision U.S. 50W SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED 0 Attachment ZSIUNZDUS IEQSPM email from Bandy Hutsell to I th.iJ_: ZTJUNZOUS CUT-I213. recommendation to accept the contractor?s price of Pages); I Action was taken, which resulted in safe egress during a dual failure supply Fan scenario. The documentation is as follou's: .. transit .g .. .t ?fm?ieorge Butler Perfonnance' Test? regrowth), headline-Unit Failure Station]: Sequence", Item -.aregesar,1ssi INT-?ail lestfail?d and thu?rcmw?ii I, r. Retraining includes ?G?statiug-that?issue was to be resolved. bygontractorhaud issue ?as-(termed resolved by [he agent; I - NOTE: Even ifthe snore-20.05 report was not refen?in'g to th block; referring an: . . @133 ?Functional Petfonnahrie'icst? Aif?ZOlii seepage {radii-estestems Qperation considerationerm. ?le labeled runs-awe Safe'Egress Mode paragraph, 2 pages; 1:252:33? PM Email [mm Pat Prendergast to PaulPr'ohs't, 2 pages; and CDC Royb'al Gampusl 5 2am? ?rst? or .Goncltision: Witne?aria where - - - . . easements sir-learns.? I a a part of the normal evaluation process a . . . the failure ofhoth fansoftheairhandlin .lmiLcould negatively impact safe egress from the 5952a? Remedial action was recommended, 'hiitfiitsdit?tot initially solve the problem. Further action was taken that solved the problem. (It was Integer-?Emmett as noted in the ire and Life Safer).r Commissioning Report assuming the ?low containment" al a . lied the vivarium . Ithe Vivarium exhaust was resolved by August, 20135, because this is explicitly noted by GBA in their AUGDS Functional Performance Test.) NOTE: This memo is only in regard to the exhaust issue in the block shortly before and during commissioning by GBA. It did not investigate the low containment lab building to The commissioning agent Burldm as Far-matted: Stilton-trough U5. GOW SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) see if there was a second issue involving the 26.1 UL2UUS report, since that was outside the de?ned scope of work for this memo. Also any changes made after GBA did their testing on varIOus building components is not re?ected in the above Attachments: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Thursday, July '19, 2012 2:34 PM To: Williams, Jeffer Jue, Bruce R. Probst, Paul E. Cc: Raymond, I ge Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Building on: Egress ssues( Proposed ?!24 Testing) Let us see if we have a DP meter that is calibrated? Paulthey do have them bring it to the test? Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-639-3303 Office 404-639-0499 Fax From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:35 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Jue, Bruce R. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Cc: Raymond, George CJOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Building Egress Issues Proposed 7/24 Testing) I don?t disagree. It?s your call. Iwasjust thinking out loud that ifthis whole claim of code violation was predicated on calcs derived from DP measurements, then I would like to have some idea of the level of accuracy the calculated methodologyi yields. it would only be done secondary to actual force measurements, as taken by a door pressure gage/pogo stick. From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:25 PM To: Williams, Jefferyr Jue, Bruce R. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Cc: Raymond, George Bowen, Ken (CDCIOCOCIIBFD) Subject: RE: Building Egress Issues Proposed W24 Testing) We could however, my two cents is why measure the DP when I thought the reason for testing with pog?o sticks {actual force) keeps us from making assumption needed to use .the formula. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404?639-3303 Office 404?639-0499 Fax From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:58 AM To: Jue, Bruce R. Cc: Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: Building Egress Issues Proposed 7724 Testing) Just a thought: is there any value in measuring DP across the doors as well to determine the margin oferror between calculated vaiues of force and empirical testing results? is this even practical or feasible during the tests. I believe there are several variables that may inflate the final force numbers when done by from DP values using the the ASHRAE formulas. From: Jue, Bruce R. (CDCXOCOOJBFO) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:09 AM E. Wigington, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. 4.3 .(cocrocoorosnE); Howard, William (Bill) (CDC/ocoorosna; Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Garner, Ron Raymond, George Powell, Steven L. Williams, Jeffery Subject: FW: Building Egress Issues Proposed 7,04 Testing) All - See below and provide feed back to the highlighted: 1. have coordinated corrective action (installing new panel hardware, changing out field modules, and new hardware programming) for the FACP for this Saturday 25/21 No CDC announcement has been sent yet. 2- A: the masses alarm stafferssensation starts as originallr designed: an nus} (immerses 3. suggest sending out one standard announcement for FA testing that includes 7K21{8:00am? 2:Dmel and 7f24 If so, l?ll send it out today. 4. Darryl has yet to receive Our order for additionalfnew door pressure scales. If they do not arrive before 7/24, we can always delay/ reschedule this testing. 5. From the attached matrix, we agreed to test #2 and #5 for the 5 doors listed plus an Tories ewes aeri'auasas hatr- It's-139E; 6. To recap our meeting from Tuesday concerning testing, Ken and I will initiate the help of the FA, stair pressurization,_a_n_d Alibi sequences; Darryl and Ken will test doorspand and Bill will observe and record data- ?eoosnisz?De Freelisatiilasrss? 7. Concerning any doors that do not pass, if the failure is by 1-5 lbs. (for example: a reading of up to 35le force], the AHJ (Jeff) has verbally agreed to granting a temporary variance until corrective actions can be taken. I will have to send him an official CDC AHJ variance request that morning. If a door fails by more than 5 lbs., immediate corrective action will be needed by adding powered door assistance, installed by FSE work order. Bruce From: Raymond, George (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 5:23 PM To: Jue, Bruce R. (CD Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Subject: Fw: Building Egress Issues F?r?l From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCXOCOOJBFO) Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 04:56 PM To: Chandler, George Browning, Daniel A. Meechan, Paul]. Co: Hendersion, Joseph Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) [Eli?ifal?f Weigh RE: Egress Issues Door test script 7-1-12.pdfab All, have reviewed the information provided below and sustain the existing ?nding that the doors referenced below are not in compliance with NFPA 101 Life Safety Code section 7.21.4.5 under extreme egress scenario based on calculations performed from pressure differentials recorded during commissioning. The commissioning report dated March 2010 does statedz, "Upon dual supply shutdown, egressfrom the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by The Commissioning (Cir) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The di?erential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to push/pull the door inward/outward before turning the handle and opening the door.? The commissioning report does not acknowledge the code?recognized steps required to open the door and the code required maximum allowable force for each step. The 15 maximum that is referenced in the commissioning report should only be applied to the maximum force required to release {open} the latch (Door Motion not the force required to open the door from a closed position. The code requires a maximum allowable force of 30 to set the door in motion from a sealed position to an open position [Door Motion and 15 lbfto open the door to the minimum required width (Door Motion 3). Per the calculations provided in the commissioning report, each door tested meets or exceeds the code required 15 maximum to release the latch [Door Motion 1). However, three of the five doors tested do not meet the 30 maximum allowable force to set the door in motion {Door Motion 2) during the most extreme conditionfmultiple equipment failure egress scenario. This is a violation of NFPA 101 section 12.1.4.5, and the data is derived from door ropening force calculations based on the differential pressures recorded during commissioning. Exception No. 1 of this section of the code states the following: ?The opening farcefor existing doors in existing buildings shall not exceed a 50 (222 N) applied to the latch stile?. Per review and interpretation ofthe AHJ, this exception does not apply in this case since the building was not considered an ?existing building' when it was built in 2005 per NFPA 101-1997. The maximum 50-lbf (222 operating I requirement of earlier editions (me?1988) of the Code remains applicable only to existing doors. The following corrective actions will be performed as soon as the program schedule can accommodate entry into this area for testing and adjustments: 1. Adjust the door closure force an affected doors to under 5 and perform empirical test of doors under testing scenarios identified in the attachment to determine actual compliance with applicable safety codes. Ensure that biological containment is maintained and that the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. If necessary, install new door closers that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to 2. ensure that biological containment is maintained and to allow the doors to meet code. Perform empirical test ofdoors to ensure biological containment is maintained and that the actual performance of the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 3. If necessary, install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door and ensure these doors will meet biological containment parameters and be in compliance with Life Safety Code requirements during the highly unlikely but certainly possible event of a multiple equipment Failure egress scenario. Perform empirical tests to ensure actual performance meets Life Safety Code Requirements. Please note that BFCJ and OSHE will be concluding actual door tests and will either con?rm a violation or indicate that we are not in violation at all. At present we are taking a conservative approach since both sets of calculated data suggest a violation under extreme failure/egress conditions. Jeff Williams Deputy Director/ ODIOCOOIBFO From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:00 PM To: Chandler Geo Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sill-?eet: Egress Issues George, A stated earlier today FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors in l:lVivarium. Fewest-than email to Jeff Williams on 1i20i2011 asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response. we (FMEO) viewed the letter of the code was applicable. The Commissioning report stated: ?the force required to open doors during supply tan failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15ibf. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount {45lb?.? As Paul stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.23.9.1 it states; ?Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure difference across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklered buildings or .1 in water column in nonsprinldered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure difference under likely conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure di?erence across doors shall exceed that which alla ws the door to begin to open by a force of 30lbf in accordance with 7.21.4.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fully open any door manually in means of egress shall not exceed ISihf to release the latch, 30ihf to set the door in motion, and ISibf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Sib? Th ese forces shall be applied to the iotch stile. ?Eircep tion No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed 50ibf applied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 151bf to engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and set the-door in motion, (S?lbf in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and. Balance report dated 12/28/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating. conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation Ib;I3i:42 U30. 252mb? Based on this our worst door is 8le over code.'We wili perform extensive test in this are the second week in July 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, Bulbs, the doors are in compliance. I No action required we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan . If the Existi loll; . . Maw failu re-con-d-Ition . - 1: Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under I Install new deor closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. I Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. if we are going toassume that the commissioner interpretation ofthe code is correct. (by the way he doesn?t reference the section of the code) then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; 5 - On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. - Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. II Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. Message: FW:Vivarium Egress as Message: FW: 1ir?i'aariurn Egress George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O?ce Centers for Disease Control and Frame tion 160i] Ciifton Road. N.W., MS: [3?04 Atlanta, GA 30333 O??ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 494.639.1635 Cell: 404.597.2599 55 Please aansr'der fire enairanmenr airfare printing this a?rnai! 42 ZBZarh. Ibi[3. ?12 mire-42 asaam, mire-42 2523s.;- Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Williams. Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:35 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. .lue, Bruce R. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Ra "nond Geor (CDCIOCOOIBFCH SEWEQF-.. . . . . -- - Egress Issues Proposed ?f24 Testing) I don?t disagree. It's your call. I wasjust thinking out loud G3, that ifthis whole claim of code violation was predicated on calcs derived from DP measurements, then I would like to have some idea of the level ofaccuracy the calculated methodology yields. It would only be done secondary to actual force measurements, as taken by a door pressure gagefpogo stick. 1' From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:25 PM To: Williams, Jeffery Jue, Bruce R. Cc: Raymond, Geore Bowen, Ken L. (CDCXOCOOJBFO) ?ject; REL. Egress Issues Proposed It! 24 Testing) We could however, my two cents is why measure the DP when I thought the reason for testing with pogo sticks {actual force) keeps us from making assumption needed to use the formula. Thanks, Ken Bowen Directorfor Facilities Engineering Office 404-639-3303 Office 404?639?0499 Fax From: Williams, Jeffery (CD CKOCODIBFD) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:58 AM To: Jue, Bruce R. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) gubiectga?s Egress Issues Proposed 7724 Testing} Just a thought: is there any value in measuring DP across the doors as well to determine the margin of error between calculated values of force and empirical testing results? Is this even practical or feasible during the tests. I believe there are several variables that may inflate the final force numbers when done by from DP values using the the ASHRAE formulas. From: Jue, Bruce R. Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:09 AM To: Probst Paul E. Wigington, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. (cocrococyows); Howard, William (Bill) (cocmcoorosus); Bowen, Ken L. (cocrocoorsro) Cc: Garner, Ron Raymond, George Powell, Steven L. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOD BFO Bicbjectt?th Egress Issues Proposed 7,124 Testing) All-H See below and provide feedback to the highlighted: 1. mm? I have coordinated corrective action {installing new panel hardware, changing out field modules, and new hardware programming) for the FACP for this Saturday 7X21 No CDC announcement has been sent yet. At__t_ha end we want to test with a ?re alarm starts as originally designed. "Bi I1 er in tassel-rsreamgee. Hosted so near? (dials-ideas? I suggest sending out one standard generic CDC__announcement for FA testing that includes 2:00pm) and 7,124 messeswaste-sieves; if so, r11 send it out today. Darryl has yet to receive our order for additionalinew door pressure scales. if they do not arrive before 71'211, we can always delayireschedule this testing. Fem theattashestmasris we agreed to test #2 ans t5isr the? desisiiesdstus shedditimei? deers- :Paliiri tan you "get these dcicir ,nLi'rrib'ers threats. Pasteur Sersedshset To recap our meeting from Tuesday concerning testing, Ken and 1 will initiate (w;J the help of the FA, stair pressurization, and?ng seqdencesgparryl and Ken El will test doors; and nd Bill will observe and record data. Concerning any doors that do not pass, if the failure is by 1-5 lbs. (for example: a reading of Up to 35 bs force}, the AHJ (Jeff) has verbally agreed to granting a temporary variance until corrective actions can be taken. I will have to send him an official CDC AHJ variance request that morning. If a door fails by more than 5 lbs., immediate corrective action will be needed by adding powered door assistance, installed by FSE work order. see .a [aliases From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 5:23 PM To: Jue, Bruce R. Prohst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) 'sbs??gsii FYI Egress Issues From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCODIEFO) Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 04:56 PM To: Chandler, George Browning, Daniel A. Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Henderson, Joseph Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: Buildin Egress Issues $322,? ltDoor test script All, I have reviewed the information provided below and sustain the existing finding that the doors referenced below are not in compliance with NFPA 101 Life Safety Code section 12.1.4.5 under extreme egress scenario based on calculations performed from pressure differentials recorded during commissioning. The commissioning report dated March 2010 does stated:, "Upon dUaisuppiy shut down, egressfrorn the Vivarium was deemed unacceptabi'e by The Commissioning (Cir) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during suppiyfan foiiure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency .101 - Life Safety Handbook. The maximum wabie force per this code in a means of egress is 15 2 lbs. The di??eren tiai pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the ollo wable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to push/pull the door in ward/outward before turning the handle and opening the do or. The commissioning report does not acknowledge the code-recognized steps required to open the door and the code required maximum allowable force for each step. The 15 maximum that is referenced in the commissioning report should only be applied to the maximum force required to release {open} the latch (Door Motion not the force required to open the door from a closed position. The code requires a maximum allowable force of 30 to set the door in motion from a sealed position to an open position {Door Motion 2), and 15 to open the door to the minimum required width (Door Motion Per the calculations provided in the commissioning report, each door tested meets or exceeds the code required 15 maximum to release the latch (Door Motion However, three ofthe five doors tested do not meet the 30 maximum allowable force to set the door in motion {Door Motion 2) during the most extreme conditionlmultipie equipment failure egress scenario. This is a violation of NFPA 101 section and the data is derived from door ?ooening force calculations based'on the differential pressures recorded during commissioning. Exception No. 1 of this section of the code states the following: "The openingforcefor existing doors in existing buildings shall not exceed a 50 {222 N) applied to the latch stile?. Per review and interpretation of the AHJ, this exception does not apply in this case since the building was not considered an ?existing building? when it was built in 2005 per NFPA 101-1997. The maximum SD-lbf {222 operating requirement of earlier editions (me?1988] of the Code remains applicable only to existing doors. The following corrective actions will be performed as soon as the program schedule can accommodate entry into this area for testing and adjustments: 1. Adjust the door closure force on affected doors to under 5 and perform empirical test of doors under testing scenarios identi?ed in the attachment to determine actual compliance with applicable safety codes. Ensure that biological containment is maintained and that the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 2. If necessary, install new door closers that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to ensure that biological containment is maintained and to allow the doors to meet code. Perform empirical test of doors to ensure biological containment is maintained and that the actual performance of the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 3. If necessary, install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door and ensure these doors will meet biological containment parameters and be in compliance with Life Safety Code requirements during the highly unlikely but certainly possible event of a multiple equipment failure egress scenario. Perform empirical tests to ensure actual performance meets Life Safety Code Requirements. Please note that BFD and DSHE will be conducting actual door tests and will either con?rm a violation or indicate that we are not in violation at all. At present we are taking a conservative approach since both? sets of calculated data suggest a violation under extreme failure/egress conditions. Jeff Williams Deputy Director 3? 770.488.8089 From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:00 PM To: Chandler, George Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Subject: a: '15 Egress Issues 282.301;- George, A stated earlier today FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors in if email to Jeff Williams on ?ll20l2011 asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response, we (FMEO) the letter of the code was applicable- The Commissioning report stated: "the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 1 5lbf. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45lb?. As Paul stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.3.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure di?eren ce across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklered buildings or .1 in water column in nonsprinklered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure dl??erence under likely conditions of staclr e?ect or wind. The pressure difference across doors shall exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by a force of 30lbf in accordance with 7.2.14.5" Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed 15lbf to reiease'the latch, 30lbf to set the door in motion, and to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for thein terior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Slbf. These forces sh all be applied to the la stile.? "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed SOlbf applied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 15lbt to engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12/28/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation it l3i'42 C. Based on this our worst door is Bibs over code. We will perform extensive test in this are the second week in July 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception ofthe code, the doors are in compliance. - No action required 2. lfthe Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure condition 43 US 262nm: I Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under . install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. 0 install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. if we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. [by the way he doesn't reference the section of the code) then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; 0 On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. 0 install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. 0 install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. lb: Vivarium Egress Message: FW: Vivarium Egress Message: George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O?ice Centers for Disease Controi and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: Atlanta, GA 30333 O?ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.63 9.1685 Call: 404.597.2599 Heme mmider {be enw?m?mc?m? 399?be pn'mi?g mix a-wa? Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:25 PM To: Williams, Jeffery Jue, Bruce R. Cc: Raymond. Geo'ge Bowen, Ken L. Subject: $352.33 5 0 Egress Issues Proposed 7i24 Testing) We could however, my two cents is why measure the DP when I thought the reason for testing with pogo sticks (actual force) keeps us from making assumption needed to use the formula. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-539-3303 Office 404-639-0499 Fax From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:58 AM To: Jue, Bruce R. (CDCIOCOQJBFO) Cc: Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: 15;; Egress Issues Proposed 7724 Testing) Just a thought: is there any value in measuring DP across the doors as well to determine the margin of error between calculated values of force and empirical testing results? Is this even practical or feasible during the tests. I believe there are several variables that may inflate the final force numbers when done by from DP values using the the ASHRAE formulas. From: Jue, Bruce R. Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:09 AM To: Probst Paul E. Wigington, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. .. Howard, William (Bill) Bowen, Ken L. Cc: Gamer, Ron Raymond, Powell, Steven L. Williams, Jeffery (CDCXOCOO Subject: FW: 5 Egress Issues Proposed ?,i24.Testing) All See below and provide feedback to the highlighted: 1. I have coordinated corrective action (installing new panel hardware, changing out field modules, and new hardware programming) for the FACP for this Saturday No CDC announcement has been sent yet. 2. at the end we want totest withafire alarm tolyverify thatwsta?ir pressuriaation starts as originally designed. its. was.has]..reaairzw Enemies? 3. I suggest sending out one standard generic CDgannuonuncement for FA testing that includes 7f21 [8:00am- Zzo?pml and i724 If so, I?ll send it out today. 4. Darryl has yet to receive our order for additionalghnew door pressure scales. if they do not arrive before 172-4, we can always delaylreschedule this testing. 5. From the attached matrix, we agreed to test #2 and #5 for the doorsLli?stled 'plusan additional?) doorsdiialm retrain 6. To recap our meeting from Tuesday concerning testing, Ken and I wall initiate the help of the FA, stair pressurization, and AHU sequences; Darryl and Ken will test doors; and and Bill will observe and record data- 7. Concerning any doors that do not pass, if the failure is by 1-5 lbs. [for example: a reading of up to 351bs force), the (Jeff) has verbally agreed to granting a temporary variance until corrective actions can be taken. I will have to send him an official CDC AHJ variance request that morning. If a door fails by more than 5 lbs., immediate corrective action will? be needed by adding powered door assistance, installed by FSE work order. stride: BFU CE From: Raymond, George (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 5:23 PM To: Jue, Bruc Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCJOCODIBFO) land?ll? ij? Egress Issues FYI From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 04:56 PM To: Chandler, George Browning, Daniel A. Meechan, Paul J. Henderso 'loseoh Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. Edam-.- Egress Issues ?Bldg [[315 Door test script All, i have reviewed the information provided below and sustain the existing finding that the doors referenced below are not in compliance with NFPA 101 Life Safety Code section 12.1.4.5 under extreme egress scenario based on calculations performed from pressure differentials recorded during commissioning. The commissioning report dated March 2010 does stated:, "Upon dual supply shut down, egressfrom the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by The Commissioning {Cx} Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during sapply fan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allo wable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to push/pull the door in ward/outward before turning the handle and opening the door. The commissioning report does not acknowledge the code-recognized steps required to open the door and the code required maximum allowable force for each? step. The 15 Ibf maximum that is referenced in the commissioning report should only be applied to the maximum force required to release [open] the latch {Door Motion not the force required to open the door from a closed position. The code requires a maximum allowable force of 30 to set the door in motion from a sealed position to an open position (Door Motion 2), and 15 lbfto open the door to the minimum required width {Door Motion 2 reverie 252mm Per the calculations provided in the commissioning report, each door tested meets or exceeds the code required 15 maximum to release the latch (Door Motion However, three of the five doors tested do not meet the 30 maximum allowable force to set the door in motion (Door Motion 2} during the most extreme conditionfmultiple equipment failure egress scenario. This is a violation of NFPA 101 section 12.1.4.5. and the data is derived from door ?opening force calculations based on the differential pressures recorded during commissioning. EXception No. 1 of this section ofthe code states the following: "The openingforce for existing doors in existing buiidings shoii not exceed a 50 ibf {222 N) applied to the iotch stile?. Per review and interpretation ofthe this exception does not apply in this case since the building was not considered an ?existing building? when it was built in 2005 per NFPA 101?1997. The maximum 50?Ibf [222 N) operating requirement of earlier editions (pm-1988) of the Code remains applicable only to existing doors. The following corrective actions will be performed as soon as the program schedule can accommodate entry into this area for testing and adjustments: 1. Adjust the door closUre force 0n affected doors to under 5 and perform empirical test of doors under testing scenarios identified in the attachment to determine actual compliance with applicable safety codes. Ensure that biological containment is maintained and that the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 2. If necessary, install new door closers that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to ensure that biological containment is maintained and to allow the doors to meet code. Perform empirical test of doors to ensure biological containment is maintained and that the actual performance ofthe doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 3. if necessary, install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door and ensure these doors will meet biological containment parameters and be in compliance with Life Safety Code requirements during the highly unlikely but certainly possible event of a muitiple equipment failure egress scenario. Perform empirical tests to ensure actual performance meets Life Safety Code Requirements. Please note that BFO and OSHE will be conducting actual door tests and will either confirm a violation or indicate that we are not in violation at ail. At present we are taking a conservative approach since both sets of calculated data suggest a violation under extreme failure/egress conditions. .leff Williams Deputy Director AHJ From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:00 PM To: Chan Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOUIBFO) Issues George, A stated earlier today FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors in SC Vivarium. Paul sent an email to Jeff Williams on 1i20i2ui?l asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response, we (FMEO) viewed the letter of the code was applicable. The Commissioning report stated: ?the force required to open doors during suppiy tan taiiure does not meet the Nationei Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum aiiowabie force per this code in a means of egress is tSiht The differentiai pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45ihtJ.? As Paul stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety' Code Section 7.2.3.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shat! use and approved engineered system with a design pressure di?erence across the barrier of not iess than .05 in water coiumn in sprinklered buildings or..?t in waterrcoiumn in nonsprin klered buildings, and sh ail be capable of maintaining the pressure difference under iikeiy conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure difference across doors shalt exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by oforce of 30lbf in accordance with 7.2.1.45? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fatty open any door manually in a means of egress shat! not exceed 15th to reiease the latch, 30th]!E to set the door in motion, and 15ibf to open the door to the minim um required width. Opening forces Jtor the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Sibf. These forces shall be appiied to the iatch stiie. "Exception No. I: the opening force for existing doors in existing buiiding shalt not exceed 50ibf applied to the iatch stile Translations, it takes 15 bf to engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, in and existing building}, 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12/281'2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door cglculation under supply fan failure operation 23.0. 252mm Based on this our worst door is over code. We will perform extensive test in this are the second week in July 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception ofthe code, the doors are in compliance. - No action required 2. If the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure conditionjib?r?i? USE. 262E1ihi I 1- Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under I install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. 9 Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. if we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. (by the way he doesn?t reference the section ofthe code) then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; 0 On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. I install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. 0 install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. . . . Message: FW:Viuarium Egress Message: FW: lVElrlUlTl Egress George K. Raymond Deputy Director Main termite-2 and Engineering Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prensa Hon 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: 13?04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404. 597. 2599 55 Please nomads? the amendment 599% it? priming ibis magi! Mathe, Chester From: Prohst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 12:0? PM To: Ray ?orid, Georqe (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Egress ssues( Proposed 7124 Testing) George: Can you send the original Excel Spreadsheet used to make the script form, or is it available on shared drive? Thanks, Paul Probst From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:53 AM .. To: Jue, Bruce R. Prnhet. Fe E. Wigington, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. 3?3 (cocrocootosne); Bowen, Ken L. (cociocootsFo) I Cc: Garner, Ron Raymond, eorge Powell, Steven L. Williams, Jeffery (coo/oco otsFO) .. .. Egress Issues Proposed 7'24 Testing) Bruce, Item 1. OK Item 2. Hold off testing stairwell pressurization until the 24th because of unknown consequences Item 3. Send out e-mail for FA on the 24m. Item 4. Yes, we can reschedule. Item 5. OK Item 6. Agree Item 7. Agree. I believe that each door should be tested at least 3 times for ?eld veri?cation of reproducible results. William Howard Biosafety Of?eei?iBiosafety Team Leader Of?ce of Safety, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 404.639.2174 678.614.7257 WCHS NOTICE: Titis message annr an)I aecanipanving documents are covered by the Eiectranic Privacy Act, 13 US. C. "2510- 252i and contains Sensitive But Unciassifietii?SB U) agarinatian intended for the speci?ed individttai??) aftixe US Department Of saith Ana? atnan Set-ideas ?for which disclosure, misuse, aiteratian at dean-action maid travel-sen! a?ert hhtianai Security or I government interests. .[fyon are not tire intended recipient or an agent responsihiefor deiivering it to tire intended recipient, you are hereby notified that yon it are received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking afany action based on tire contents information is strictiv prohibited. Jyoti have received this in error, piease notify as inmseriiateiv by E-maii, and deiete tire originai mesSage. Dissemination oftiris message and/or its contents to tire genera! pnbiic or media is not authorized. From: Joe, Bruce R. Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:09 AM Wigington, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) Bowen, Ken L. (CDCJOCODIBFO) Cc: Garner, Ron Raymond, George Powell, Steven L. Williams, Jeffery Egress Esoes( Proposed it 24 Testing) All See below and provide feedback to the highlighted: 1. I have coordinated corrective action (installing new panel hardware, changing out field modules, and new hardware programming) for the FACP for this Saturday No CDC announcement has been sent yet. 2. Atthe end we want to test withafirealarm ?tomverify that stair_presusurligation starts as originally designed. ls?ihisekavhr should iw?. upwhoit:treason} 3. suggest sending out one standard generic EJDC announcement for FA testing that includes 2721 (8:00am- 2:00pm} and U24 passagesagape}; if so, I?ll send it out today. 4. Darryl has yet to receive our order for door pressure scales. Ifthey do not arrive before W24, we can always delay/reschedule this testing. 5- Free Westward maids. its eased t0 test t2 are! t5..fsr.ti1s 5 Elms listed pluses l?aUl - Centre??! tetra-ta:orgies spreewheat-sinenesniv 6. To recap our meeting from Tuesday concerning testing, Ken and 1 will initiate the help of the FA, stair and Ken will test doors; annd Bill will observe and record data- all 7. Concerning any doors that do not pass, if the failure is by 1-5 lbs. (for example: a reading of up to 35lbs force), the {Jeff} has verbally agreed to granting a temporary variance until corrective actions can be taken. I will have to send him an official CDC variance reqL'iest that morning. If a door falls by more than 5 lbs., be needed by adding powered door assistance, installed by FSE work order. aarssi Bruce From: Raymond, George Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 5:23 PM To: Jue, Bruce R. Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Fw: . . Egress Issues F?i?l From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 04:56 PM To: Chandler, George Browning, Daniel A. Meechan, Paul J. (CDCJOCODXOSHE) Cc: Henderson, Joseph Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. 33?. :12 US C. Subject-RE: Egress ISSUES [til-f3. =12 US. 3 2623s.- -- Door test script f'l All, I have reviewed the information provided below and sustain the existing finding that the doors referenced below are not in compliance with NFPA 101 Life Safety Code section 7.2.1.4.5 under extreme egress scenario based on calculations performed from pressure differentials recorded during commissioning. The commissioning report dated March 2010 does stated:, "Upon dual supply shut down, egress from the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by The Commissioning (Ex) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the "Na tional Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessiva negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to push/pull the door in ward/outward before turning the handle and opening the door. The commissioning report does not-acknowledge the code?recognized steps required to open the door and the code required maximum allowable force for each step. The 15 maximum that is referenced in the commissioning report should only be applied to the maximum force required to release (open) the latch (Door Motion not the force required to open the door from a closed position. The code requires a maximum allowable force of 30 to set the door in motion from a sealed position to an open position (Door Motion 2), and 15 Ibfto open the door to the minimum required width (Door Motion 3). Per the calculations provided in the commissioning report, each door tested meets or exceeds the code required 15 maximum to release the latch (Door Motion However, three of the five doors tested do not meet the 30 maximum allowable force to set the door in motion {Door Motion 2] during the most extreme conditionlmultiple equipment failure egress scenario. This is a violation of NFPA 101 section and the data is derived from door ?opening force calculations based on the differential pressures recorded duri?g commissioning. Exception No. 1 of this section of the code states the following: "The opening force for existing doors in existing buildings sh all not exceed a 50 {222 N) applied to the latch stile Per review and interpretation of the this exception does not apply in this case since the building was not considered an ?existing building? when?it was built in 2005 per NFPA 101-1997. The maximum 50-Ibf (222 N) operating requirement of earlier editions (pro-1988} of the Code remains applicable only: to existing doors. The following corrective actions will be performed. as soon as the program schedule can accommodate entry into this area for testing and adjustments: 1. Adjust the door closure force an affected doors to under 5 and perform empirical test of doors under testing scenarios identified in the attachment to determine actual compliance with applicable safety; codes. Ensure that biological containment is maintained and that the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 2. If necessary, install new door closers that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to ensure that biological containment is maintained and to allow the doors to meet code. Perform empirical test of doors to ensure biological containment is maintained and that the actual performance of the doors meet Life Safety,f Code requirements. 3. If necessary, install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door and ensure these doors will meet biological containment parameters and be in compliance with Life Safety Code requirements during the highly unlikely but certainly possible event of a multiple equipment failure egress scenario. Perform empirical tests to ensure actual performance meets Life Safety Code Requirements. Please note that BFO and OSHE will be conducting actual door tests and will either con?rm a violation or indicate that we are not in violation at all. At present we are taking a conservative approach since both sets of calculated data suggest a violation under extreme failure/egress conditions. Jeff Williams Deputy Director Tia-188.8039 From: Raymond, George (CDCJOCOOXBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2012 4:00 PM To: Chandler, George Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. (CDCJOCODTBFO) mars, :12 Ema-ectl:EgrESS ISSUES George, A stated earlier today' FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors in email to Jeff Williams on i20i2011 asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response, we (FMEO) viewed the letter of the code was applicable. The Commissioning report stated: r?the force required to open doors during suppiy fan faiiure does not meet the Nationai Fire Protection Agency'tui Life Safety Handbook. The maximum aiiowabie torso per this code in a means of egress is 15ibf. The diderentiei pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45:130. As Paul stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety' Code Section 7.2.33.1 it states; "Smoke proof enciosures using stair pressurization shat! use and approved engineered system with a design pressure di?erence across the barrier of not iess than .05 in water coiumn in sprin idered buiidings or .1 inwater coiumn in nonsprinkiered buildings, and sh be capabie of maintaining the pressure dh?feren ce under iikeiy conditions ofstack e?ect or wind. The pressure di?eren ce across doors shaii eXceed that which aiiows the door to begin to open by a force of SOibf in accordance with 12.1.4.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fuiiy open any door monuoiiy in or means of egress shoii not exceed 15ibf to release the hatch, 30ibf to set the door in motion, ond lSibf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without ciosure she? not exceed 5 ib? These forces shoii be oppiied to the iotch stiie. "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing boiiding shoil not exceed S?ibf oppiied to the iotch stiie? Translations, it takes. 15ibf to engage the latch on the door, SUlbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, in and existing building}, 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated and using a door closure force calculated by using-normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supva fan failure operation SE ?2523th- Based on this our worst door is Bibs over code. We will perform Extensive test in this are the second week in July 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation ofthe code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. I No action required 2. lfthe Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a suppr fan I'bll'Sl'clE US [1.55- 2523ll1 failure conditidn; ? I Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under 5ibf I Install new. door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. I . Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. (by the way he doesn?t reference the section of the code} then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; I On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. 5 Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. I Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. Message: FW: . George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O?ee Centers for Disease Control and Preoen i?inn 1600 Cli?on Road, NW, MS: 1104 Atlanta, GA 30333 O??ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1635 Cell: 404. 5912599 55 Please mni'z'a'er lee ente?mnineni lagers peeling this e-niaii Maths, Chester (GDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:58 AM To: Jue, Bruce R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Ray nond. Geo'ge Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) . Subiect: RE: Egbe?ii?iu's'? Egress Issues Proposed T124 Testing) Just a thought: is there anyr value in measuring DP across the doors as well to determine the margin of error between calculated values of force and empirical testing results? Is this even practical or feasible during the tests. believe there are several variables that may inflate the final force numbers when done by from DP values using the the formulas. From: Jue, Bruce R. Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:09 AM E. Wigington, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOJOSHE), Bowen, Ken L. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) winner-42 a c: arner, on Raymond, George Powell, Steven L. Williams, [b33142 2:32th} Jeffery (coo/ocoo Egress Issues Proposed ?/24 Testing) All - See below and provide feedback to the highlighted: have coordinated corrective action [installing new panel hardware, changing out field modules, and new hardware programming] for the FACP for this Saturday No CDC announcement has been sent vet. At the end we want to_test_ whoa ?realarrntonvehrify thatqstair'pressurization starts as originally designed. Bil l. 1015+: satis?es. Er sEdelweiss;esexiness;we:menma suggest sending out one standard generic CDC announcement for FA testing that includes 7X21 [8:00am? 2:00pm) and 7,24 If so, PM send it out today. Darryl has yet to receive our order for additional/new door pressure scales. if they do not arrive before 7,124, we can always delav/ reschedule this testing. It From the attached matrix, we agreed to t_est {t2 and #5 for the 5 doors listed plus an?additional 3 doors. mun-- 1. 053 Uimibsieia?? salt.- To recap our meeting from Tuesday concerning testing, Ken and I will initia stair pressurization,aod?HU sequences; and Ken will test doors; an fthe help of the FA, 139-42 nd Bill will observe and record data- Concerning any.r doors that do not pass, if the failure is by 1?5 lbs. (for example: a reading of up to 35 bs force), the AHJ (Jeff) has verbally agreed to granting a temporary variance until corrective actions can be taken. I will have to send him an official CDC variance request that morning. If a door fails by more than 5 lbs, immediate corrective action will be needed by adding powered door assistance, installed by FSE work order. BTU CE uni-[3. 42 From: Raymond, George (CDCIDCUOKBFO) Sent: Monday, July 02,, 2012 5:23 PM To: Jue, Bruce R. coc ocoogaFO); Probst, Paul E. (CDC/ocoorsro); Walpole, Kenneth K. (cocrocm/BFO) ?fl?ieat: Fw: Egress Issues ubtisdzg??jg?lua?: I 252mb: FYI From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012' 04:56 PM To: Chandler, George Browning, Daniel A. Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Henderson Joseph Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. [Egress Issues Door test script T-1-12.pdfa> All, I have reviewed the information provided below and sustain the existing finding that the doors referenced below are not in compliance with NFPA 101 Life Safety Code section 12.1.4.5 under extreme egress scenario based on calculations performed from pressure differentials recorded during commissioning. The commissioning report dated March 2010 does statedz, "Upon duaisuppiy shutdown, egressfrom the Vivarium was deemed unacceptabie by The Commissioning {Cx} Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during suppiy fan faiiure does not meet the ?Nationai Fire Pro tection Agency - Life Safety.?r Handbook. The maximum aiiowahie force per this code in a means of egress is 15 ibs. The di??erentiai pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than threetim es that of the aiiawabie force per code. Aisa, on same doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the reiease of the eiectronic security iatch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessaryr to push/poi! the door inward/outward before turning the handie and opening the door.? The commissioning report does not acknowledge the code-recognized steps required to open the door and the code required maximum allowable force for each step. The 15 maximum that is referenced in the commissioning report should onlv be applied to the maximum force required to release (open) the latch (Door Motion not the force required to open the door from a closed position. The code requires a maximum allowable force of 30 to set the door in motion from a sealed position to an open position (Door Motion 2), and 15 to open the door to the minimum_required width (Door Motion Per the calculations provided in the commissioning report, each door tested meets or exceeds the code required 15 maximum to release the latch (Door Motion 1). However, three ofthe five doors tested do not meet the 30 maximum allowable force to set the door in motion {Door Motion 2) during the most extreme condition/multiple equipment failure egress scenario. This is a violation of NFPA 101 section and the data is derived from door -opening force calculations based on the differential pressures recorded during commissioning. Exception No. 1 of this section of the code states the following: "The openingforcefor existing doors in existing buiidings shaii not exceed a 50 ibf {222 N) appiied to the iatch stiie?. Per review and interpretation of the this exception does not apply in this case since the building was not considered an ?existing building? when it was built in 2005 per NFPA 101-1997. The maximum (222 N) operating requirement of earlier editions (pm-1988) of the Code remains applicable only to existing doors. The following corrective actions will be performed as soon as the program schedule can accommodate entry into this area for testing and adjustments: 2 1. Adjust the door closure force on affected doors to under 5 and perform empirical test of doors under testing scenarios identi?ed in the attachment to determine actual compliance with applicable safety codes. Ensure that biological containment is maintained and that the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 2. If necessary, install new door closers that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to ensare that biological containment is maintained and to allow the doors to meet code. Perform empirical test of doors to ensure biological containment is maintained and that the actual performance of the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 3. If necessary, install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door and ensure these doors will meet biological containment parameters and be in compliance with Life Safety Code requirements during the highly unlikely but certainly possible event of a multiple equipment failure egress scenario. Perform empirical tests to ensure actual performance meets Life Safety Code Requirements. Please note that BFD and OSHE will be conducting actual door tests and will either con?rm a violation or indicate that we are not in violation at all. At present we are takinga conservative approach since both sets of calculated data suggest a violation under extreme failure/egress conditions. Jeff Williams Deputy Director oo/ocooxaro From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:00 PM To: Chandler Geore Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. St??ect: Egress Issues George. A stated earlier today FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors inivar?ium-t email to Jeff Williams on 1i20i2011 asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response, we (FMEO) viewed the letter of the code was applicable. The Commissioning report stated: "the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is iSibf. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45090. As Paul stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.3.9.1it states; "Sm oke proof en closures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure di??erence across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in 3 sprinklered buildings or.1 in" water column in nansprinlclered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure di??erence under likely conditions of stock ejj?ect or wind. The pressirre di??erence across doors sh all exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by a force of 30lbf in accordance with 7.2.14.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.1.4.5 it states; ?The forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed 1-5lbf to release the latch, 30lbf to set the door in motion, and 15lbf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side?hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Slbf. These forces shall he applied to the latch stile. ?Exception Na. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed SUlbf applied to the latch stile Translations, it takes 15lbfto engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, in and existing building], 15 pounds to fulliyI open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12f28i2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation 4E I3. E?EaIlii Based on this our Worst door is over code. We will perform extensive test in'this are the second week in July 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception ofthe code, 50lbs, the doors are in compliance. 0 No action required 2. if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan canditiUnHlUHB'r-l? US 0 ?262allii I - Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under 0 Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. - Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. if we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. [by the way he doesn't reference the section ofthe code) then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; a On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. 0 Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. 0 install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the doorMessage: FW.VwarIurn Egress no Message. FW. 3*.42 Vivarlum Egress BI]ng K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Oj?ice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: 13?04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Of?ce: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1635 Cell: 404.597.2599 a Heme marz?der ale eaabaaraea! af?rm priming Ibis a?eaa? Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Sent: Thursday, Julv19,2012 9:53 AM To: Jue, Bruce R. Probst, Paul E- Wigington, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. 3092523011 Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Co: Garner, Ron Raymond, George Powell, Steven (CD I a Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) i Egress Issues (Proposed Tt24 Testing) Subject: Bruce, Item 1. OK Item 2. Hold off testing stairwell pressurization until the 24th because of unknown consequences Item 3. Send out email for FA on the 24th. Item 4. Yes, we can reschedule. Item 5. 0K Item 6. Agree Item 7. Agree. I believe that each door should be tested at least 3 times for ?eld veri?cation of reproducible results. William Howard Biossfety Of?ceriBiosafetj.r Team Leader Of?ce of Safety, Health, and Environment (0 SHE) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 404.639.21'i4 678.614.7257 N0 TICE: This message and any accompanying documents are covered try rite Eicctronic Communications Privacy Act, it? EEC. 25M- 252!? anti contains Sensitive Bat Unciassifiedt?SBUj itn?orrnation intended for the speci?ed indivitittaifsj ofiite US Department Of Heaitn Amt Human Services - for which disclosure, misuse, otteretion or destruction conio' adverseiv affect Notional Seem-int or government interests. ifyon are not the intended recipient or an agent responsibiefor deiivcring it to tire intended recipient, you are itereoy notified that you have received titis message in error and titer any review, dissemination, copying, or tire (airing ofany aciion based on the contents of'titis information is strietty protribiteo?. iffyoa trove receivedr am in error, piease net?i?r as irnnreriiateip by E-mait, and Jaime tire originat message Dissemination of this message anti/or its contents to tire genera! pnbiic or media is not authorized. From: Joe, Bruce R. Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:09 AM To: Probs Paul E. Wigington, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. cocrocootosi-IE); Howard, William (Bill) (coo/ocoo/OSHE); Bowen, Ken (coo/ocoorsrm arner, on Raymond, George Powell, Steven L. Williams, I Jeffery Subject: FW: Building Egress Issues Proposed 7124 Testing) All See below and provide feedback to the highlighted: 1. I have coordinated corrective action {installing new panel hardware, changing out ?eld modules, and new hardware programming) for the FACP for this Saturday 7/21 No CDC announcement has been sentyet 2. A_t_t_he enc elhwxe wanut?to test with a ?re that stair?pressuritation starts as originally designed. Britt- Meade-lite}moraine 3. I suggest sending out one standard generig\C?DC?announcement for FA testing that includes 7f21l8:00am- 2:00pm} and 75/24 oogsgg?dncii'r? Ifso, send it out today. Darryl has yet to receive our order for additional/new door pressure scales. lfthey do not arrive before 7/24, we can always delay/reschedule this testing. 5- Frame attached matriswe agreedse tests? matter messes listeialss anasditienal? dese- Palli- Fewer: g'?fthe's'? are theater? is. forests meatless! gasses-saltbars. the-EOE; E. To recap our meeting from Tuesday concerning testing, Ken and I will initiate [wf the help of the FA, stair pressurization, and sequen_c_es_;_Dar_ryJ and Ken will test doors; and and Bill will observe and data. an S?liiaa'tssi?? 7. Concerning any doors that do not pass, if the failure is by 1-5 lbs. {for example: a reading of up to 35Ibs force), the AHJ (Jeff) has verbally agreed to granting a temporary variance until corrective actions can be taken. I will have to send him an official CDC AHJ variance request that morning. Ifa door falls by more than 5 lbs., immediate corrective action will be needed by adding powered door assistance, installed by FSE work order. Bruce From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCDOKBFD) Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 5:23 PM To: Jue, Bruce R. (CDC Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Subject: Fw: Building gress Issues FYI From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 04:56 PM I To: Chandler, George Browning, Daniel A. Meechan, Paul J. (CDCXOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Henderson Joseh Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. Egress Issues ?Bldg oor test script All, have reviewed the information provided below and sustain the existing finding that the doors referenced below are not in compliance with NFPA 101 Life Safety Code section 7.2.1.4.5 under extreme egress scenario based on calculations performed from pressure differentials recorded during commissioning. The commissioning report dated March 2010 does stated:, "Upon dual suppiy shut down, egress from the Vivarium was deemed an accep tabie by The Commissioning {Cx} Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply Jfan faiiure does not meet the "Nationai Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 tife Safety Handbook. The maximum aiiowobie force per this code in a means of egress is 15 ihs. The di?erentiai pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the aiiowobie force per code. Aiso, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the reiease of the eiectronic security iatch as commanded the card reader; it was necessary to push/puii the door in ward/ outward before turning the handie and opening the door.? The commissioning report does not acknowiedge the code-recognized steps required to open the door and the code required maximum allowable force for each step. The 15 Ibf maximum that is referenced in the commissioning report should only be applied to the maximum force required to release (open) the latch (Door Motion not the force required to open the door from a closed position. The code requires a maximum allowable force of 30 to set the door in motion from a sealed position to an open position (Door Motion 2), and 15 Ibf to open the door to the minimum required width (Door Motion 3). Per the calculations provided in the commissioning report, each door tested meets or exceeds the code required 15 Ibf maximum to release the latch {Door Motion However, three ofthe five doors tested do not meet the 30 ibf maximum allowable force to set the door in motion (Door Motion 2) during the most extreme conditionfmultiple equipment failure egress scenario. This is a violation of NFPA 101 section 12.1.4.5. and the data is derived from door ?opening force calculations based on the differential pressures recorded during commissioning. Exception No. 1 of this section of the code states the following: "The opening forcefor existing doors in existing buiidings shail' not exceed a 50 {22.2 N) applied to the iatch stiie?. Per review and interpretation of the this exception does not apply in this case since the building was not considered an 'existing building? when it was built in 2005 per NFPA 101?1992. The maximum (222 N) operating requirement of earlier editions (me-1988) of the Code remains applicable only to existing doors. The following corrective actions will be performed as soon as the program schedule can accommodate entry into this area for testing and adjustments: 1. Adjust the door closure force on affected doors to under 5 Ibf and perform empirical test of doors under testing scenarios identified in the attachment to determine actual compliance with applicable safety codes. Ensure that biological containment is maintained and that the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. '1 2. if neceSSary, install new door closers that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to ensure that biological containment is maintained and to allow the doors to meet code. Perform empirical test of doors to ensure biological containment is maintained and that the actual performance of the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 3. If necessary, install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door and ensure these doors will meet biological containment parameters and be in compliance with Life Safety Code requirements during the highly unlikely but certainly possible event ofa multiple equipment failure egress scenario. Perform empirical tests to ensure actual performance meets Life Safety Code Requirements. Please note that BFO and OSHE will be conducting actual door tests and will either confirm a violation or indicate that we are not in violation at all. At present we are taking a conservative approach since both sets of calculated data suggest a violation under extreme failure/egress conditions. 3 llJlI[3: 252$le Jeff Williams Deputy Director AHJ 7?0.488.8089 From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:00 PM To: Chandler Geo Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Egress Issues George, A stated earlier today FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors in warium. Paul-sent an email to Jeff Williams on 1l20l2011 asking for and interpretation of the code. Upon no response, we viewed the letter of the code was applicable. The Commissioning report stated: "the force required to open doors during supply tan failure does not meet the National'Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is t?lhf. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45mg. As Paul stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA l?l Life Safety Code Section 12.3.9.1 it states; ?Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure difference across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in" sprin klered buildings or .1 in water column in nonsprinlrlered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure di??erence under likely conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure di??eren ce across doors shall exceed that which alloWs the door to begin to open by a force of 30lbf in accordance with 12.1.4.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.1.4.5 it states; ?The forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed 15th)? to release the latch, 30lbf to set the door in motion, and 15lbf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed 5lbf.? These forces shall be applied to the latch stile.? "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed 50lbf applied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 15 bf to engage the latch onthe door, 301b'f pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, (solhf in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12/289010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supplv fan failure operation SC. 252mb: Based on this our worst door is 8le over code. We will perform extensive test in this are the second week in July 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. - No action required 2. If the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supva fan failure condition; I?m 342 @252th I 0 Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under I Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. I install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. (by the wayr he doesn?t reference the section of the code} then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; On a supva fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. - Install that will allowthe exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supva fan failure. I Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the doorMessage: FW: 42- Vivarium Egress cc. Message: FW: .2142 .Ivanum Egress r? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce Cer?ersfar Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Cli?an Read, N.W., MS: 13-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 O?ce: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404. 597.2599 5?5 Pieate wander the ag?reprinrz'ag e-maii Mathe, Cheater (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: F'robst. Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday. June 22, 2012 9:01 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: Fw: Vivarium upgrade Amazing how the media is accepted as truth. Original Message From; I Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 08:29 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Subject: Vivarium upgrade Paul In light ofthe incident with the Vivarium space i am talking with TekAir about offering you an upgrade for that area to get rid of the Phoenix valves and install our Accuvalves. If memorv serves, this is the area about 10 or so Phoenix valves there. Can we discuss this later today? I'm flying in about 11 and could drop by on the way home and perhaps grab some lunch. Chades Sent from my iPhone Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Joe, Bruce R. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 9:34 AM To: Raymond, George Walpole, Kenneth K. Ce: Belflower, Craig Garner, Ron Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Powell, Steven L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE:ivarium Egress Ken I noticed your out of of?ce message and I?m on leave Monday. Let?s work together on this Tuesday morning after the staff meeting. The actual test needs to occur any evening or weekend after July 9. We are in the middle of ordering and replacing FACP hardware CE From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 7:48 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Jue, Bruce R. Ce: Beiflower, Craig Garner, Ron Prolost, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. (CDCKOCOOIBFU) Subject: FW: 9,13,, Vivarium Egress Ken} Bruce, We need to develop test scripts and a schedule for performing the below mentioned test. Please coordinate together and get with Craig and Ron to identify any ET resources you need. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Meinienmrce and Engineering O?icc Centers for Disease Control! and Prevention 1600 Clt?ou Rood, N. W., 3145: Atlanta, GA 30333 404.639.3335 For: 4-04.63 9. 1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 5% Ham's consider foe arrairormzam before prirrfiag as From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:54 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Jue, Bruce R. Koob, Stephen H. Walpole, Kenneth K. Bel?ower, Craig Wigington, Darryl (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Cc: Chandler, Subject: FW: This is FM E0 response to BFO OD and OSHE to address the OSHA complaint of violation of the NFPA 101 Life safety code and a testing scenario for the Vivarium area HVAC system, fire alarm system and door opening force under AHU supply fan failure. Paul Probst?s email below dated 1l20l2011 references the commissioning report dated 12l28l2010. In that report it stated; "the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15lbf. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a farce greater than three times that amount (45 lot). As Paul stated in his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.33.1 it states; "Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shalt use and approved engineered system with a design I pressure difference across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklered buildings or .1 in water column in nonsprinlclered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure difference under likely conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure difference across doors shall exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by a force of 30lbf in accordance with 7.21.4.5" Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed 15lbf to release the latch, 30lbf to set the door in motion, and 15lbf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Slbf. These forces shall be applied to the latch stile. "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed SOlbf applied to the latch stile Translations, it takes 15 bf to engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, (SOlbf in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12/23/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation Measured [b}l3}:4 USE. 262301 ?2E2ainl rd. awe) total door?opening force, lb; ch force to overcome door closer, in, door oreo, ft .4 door oreo, ff2 dp pressure difference across door, in. of water distance from doorknob to edge of knot: side of door, fr Under these measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. However, if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may i 33531:? issues lilii I. If we adjust the door closure force on these doors to under 5 be these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. Door calculation under supply fan failure operation itlii3lit12 II. 262mb;- FMED has developed the following test scenarios to confirm the following; I Current operating condition under system failure and fire alarms in the build. 0 Total door opening force under system failure and ?re alarm in the building El'al'zi?ii? onl .. Ito and test during supply fan failure and alarm conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm General building Fire alarm Supply fan failure Stairwell pressure fans [Everything but a pull station starts the fans} Freeze protections. Fire alarm system Scenario Verify Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by the fire alarm system. Test??mt. Fire STAIRWELL DOORS States alarm AHU EXHAUST FANS OK Normal Normal ON ON OFF YES AHU dual Fan Failure Safety interlock] Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON UN General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. Doors that will be tested are listed as follows; OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap} These doors were identified during the original construction as egress doors and were tested to meet NFPA 101 and ADA requirement. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce Centurslor Disease Control and Prevention T600 Clifton Road. N.W., MS: Atlanta, GA 30333 Qtj?'cc: 404.539.3335 Fax.- 404.539.1535 Cell: 404.597.2599 Warm the enlargement lie/bra peerage this were? From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (?will Egress 252st FYI From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM To: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Vivarium Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent?s report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. in the report. it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 Ibf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 4 12.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lbf. Since the project modified air flow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. F?aul Prohst Attac men t5. 1. Report 2. NFPA 101 - 2000 3. ASHRAE Formula some: coo I:ch Ropoerdf>> File: NFPA 101 -- File: ashrac formulapdf}? For ease of reference. this is what the C): report states: ?The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessitre negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushipull the door inwardroutward before turning the handle and opening the door." Mathe, Chester (cocrocoorossp) From: Raymond. George Sent: Thursday. June 21, 2012 7:43 AM To: Walpole. Kenneth K. Jue. Bruce R. Cc: Beltlower, Craig Garner, Ron Probst. Paul E. (Corr? Bowen. Ken L. Subject: FW: pair; Vivarium Egress Ken/Bruce, We need to develop test scripts and a schedule for performing the below mentioned test. Please coordinate together and get with Craig and Ron to identify any ET resources you need. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenancennd Engineering O?frce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road. N.W., MS: Atlanta, GA 30333 Of?ce: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 4045912599 55 Pieces consider the an?? printing this tar-rear! From: Raymond, George (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:54 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Jue, Bruce R. Koch, Stephen H. Walpole. Kenneth K. Bel?oweri Craig Wigington, Darryl (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Chandler, HERE-112 2.523.?. FW: ivarium Egress This is FMEO response to BFO OD and DSHE to address the OSHA complaint ofuiolation of the NFPA 101 Life safety code and a testing scenario for the Vivarium area HVAC sustemlr fire alarm system and door opening force under AHU supply fan failure. Paul Probst?s email below dated 1i20i2011 references the commissioning report dated 12i28i2010. In that report it stated; "the force required to open doors duringr supply fan failure does not meet the Nationai Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum aiiowahie force perthis code in a means of egress is 15th:?. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount {45 ran. As Paul stated in his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.3.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization sh use and approved engineered system with a design pressure difference across the barrier of not less than .05 in water caiurnn in sprinidered huiidings or .1 in water column in nonsprinidered buiidings, and shaii be capable of maintaining the pressure difference under iikeiy conditions ofstack effect or wind. The pressure difference across doors shalt exceed that which aiiaws the door to begin to open by aforce of30ibf in accordance with 7.2.14.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed 15lbf to release the latch, 30ibf to set the door in motion, and 15lbf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Sibf. These forces shall be applied to the latch stile.? "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed 50ibf applied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 15lbf to engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, in and existing buildingi, 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12f28f2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation Measured lb}(3}242 U.S.C. 2732ath} Door calculation under normal operation Measured Measured use. 262afh} Falc- total door-opening force, lb, Fa, force to overcome door closer, ibf door area, ft A door area, ft} dp pressure di?erence across door, in. of water distance from doorknob to edge of knob side of door, ft Under these measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. However, if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure condition; 262801} If we adjust the door closure force on these doors to under 5 be these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure conditiOn. 2 Door calculation under supply fan failure operation USE. {3 2523m- FM EU has developed the following test scenarios to confirm the following; - Current operating condition under system failure and fire alarms in the build. II Total door opening force under system failure and ?re alarm in the building - Adjust door closure force onI conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm General building Fire alarm Supply fan failure 2523M: Stairwell pressure fans (Everything but a pull station starts the fans) Freeze protections. Fire alarm-system Scenario Verify Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by the fire alarm system. Iest Matrix Ito and test during supply fan failure and alarm Fire STAIRWELL DOORS States alarm AHU EXHAUST FANS OK Normal Normal ON ON OFF YES AHU dual Fan Failure (AHU Safety Interlock) Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON UN General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN UN Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THE MAIN LEVEL. THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON Doors that will be tested are listed as follows; [11113311242 Un?? 262301} These doors were identified during the original construction as egress doors and were tested to meet NFPA 101 and ADA requirement. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Engineering Ccnivrsfor Disease and Prevention 1501! Cii?on Rand, Milli? MS: 15?0-1 r?liimzla, GA 30333 Omit-2' 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Ct-ii: 404.591.3599 5-5 Pisa?? consider fie Pin-rimer before pointing ma- e?ximiz? From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM To: Raymond, rge Vivarium Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM To: Williams Jeffery serif Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report. it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 Ibf and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 Ibf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 12.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 Ibf. Since the project modi?ed air ?ow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Erobst Atlachments: 1. (3x Report 2. 2000 3. ASHRAE Formula - CDC NFPR l?l - ashrae formula.de l: .3142 .s c: 5 523.?; CI 2000.de For ease of reference, this is what the Cx report states: "The Commissioning (CK) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum aliowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured-across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushlpull the door inwardioutward before turning the handle and opening the door." 262mb I .I Maths, Chester From: Raymond, George Sent: Wednesday, June 20, .2012 11:54 AM - To: F'robst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Jue, BruceFt. Koob, Stephen H. Walpole, Kenneth K. Belflower. Craig Wigington, Darryl Gaol; Che George dialect: F-W: lVivarium Egress This is FMEO response to BFO OD and OSHE to address the OSHA complaint of violation of the NFPA 101 Life safety code and a testing scenario for the Vivarium area HVAC system, ?re alarm system and door opening force under AHU supply fan failure. Paul Probst's email below dated rll20l20?l'1 references the commissioning report dated 12l28l2ti10. In that report it stated; "the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is t?lbf. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 As Paul stated in'his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.23.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure difference across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklered buildings or .1 in water column in nonsprinltlered buildings,.ond shall be capable of-maintoining the pressure difference under likely conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure difference across doors shall exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by a force ofBOlbf in accordance with 12.1.4.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.1.4.5 it states; he forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed ISlbf to release the latch, 30th to set the door in motion, and ISlbf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Sib? These forces shall be applied to the latch stile. ?Txceptlon No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed 50lbf applied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 15lbfto engage the latch on the door, BOlbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, {Stilt-f in and existing building}, 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 132(28/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating'conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supva fan failure operation 262mb Measured uses 262all' Door calculation under normal operation Measured Measured 262aih} 5.20lefA ch 2(W?d) total door?opening force, lo; Fd, force to overcome door closer, lb; door oreo, ft A door area, it2 do 2 pressure dr?erence across door, in. of we ter distance from doorknob to edge ofirnob side of door, ft Under these measurements,calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. However, if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may If we adjust the door closure force on these doors to under 5lbf, these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. Door calculation under supply fan failure operation {Mill}; 2 uses 252% FMEO has developed the following test scenarios to con?rm the following; 0 Current operating condition under system failure and fire alarms in the build. I Total door opening force under system failure and fire alarm in the building Ito and test during supply fan faj'ure and abrm conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm General building Fire alarm Supply fan failure Stairwell pressure fans (Everything but a pull station starts the fans) 2 Freeze protections. Fire alarm system Scenario Verify Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by the fire alarm system. Fire STAIRWELL DOORS States alarm AHU EXHAUST FANS OK Normal Normal ON ON OFF YES i AHU dual Fan Failure (AHU Safety 3 Interlock] Normal OFF MIN OFF i AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON oN on General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. Doors that will be tested are listed as follows; WHEN-.42 SC 2623"?: These doors were identified during the original construction asegress doors and were tested to meet NFPA 101 and ADA requirement. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Maintenance and Engineering Ojj?ice Centers for Disease Coniroi and Promotion 1600 Cii?on Rand, MW, MS: 13?04. Atlanta, GA 30333 Of?ce: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Ccii: 40%.5912599 ?PIenir consider for ina?ara printing for} a?mnii, From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM To: Raymond. George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) 5%}3312 livarium Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM To: Williams Jeffery (CDCXOCOOIBFO) WW ivarium Egress 252301] Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we tatked about in late December. have attached both the commissioning agent?s report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 Ibf and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lbf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 12.1.4.5 Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lbf. Since the project modi?ed air ?ow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. Ex Report 2. NFPA 101 2000 3. ASHRAE Formula HIT . - - 4 - CDC NFPA 101 - ashrae formulaide [mom . . 2min} 2000.pdf For ease of reference, this is what the C): report states: "The Commissioning (Cir) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook?. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also. on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushipull the door inwardioutward before turning the handle and opening the door." a air analysis of atlanta. inc. 1520 pine log rd conyers. ga 30011 (no) 929-3165 (no) 483-?365 fax hyac consulting test and balance commissioning December 28, 2010 Karen Moss, PE CDC Building 18 Lab Renovation Cx Functional Test Documentation Atlanta, GA HVAC Mod Cx Functional Tests Documentation: [srz 1. Fall Um throwing disconnect on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position damper closes and exhaust plenum static control damper modulates to maintain static pressure set point w.c. for the exhaust system ?yes maintains ore-failure operating conditions yes _no. All tabs maintain required directional airflow a yes _no. 2. into operation and allow system to stabilize. 3. by throwing disconnect on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position damper closes and exhaust plenum static control damper modulates to it maintains pre-failure operating conditions )5 yes All labs maintain required directional airflow )5 yes _no. . Ell- 4. Fail one fan A U-SC @233 . Expected results: The remaining cs continues to operate an toe VFD speeds up and maintains supply du pressure set point Ewe. for the supply air systemi yes _no. Both . continue to operate normally 5 yes Hno. All tabs maintain required directional airflow a yes, _no. 5. Restorto normal operation and allow system to stabilize. 6. Fall one fan El 0 . Expected resutts: The remainingm supply fan continues to operate and the VFD speeds up and maintains supply duct static pressure set point Ewe. for the supply air system; yes _no. Both continue to operate normally yes no. All labs maintain required dire-o iona airflow 5 yes no. 7. Restore the system to normal operation. 8. Fail $5523 by throwing disconnects on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position - - i see and exhaust plenum static control damper closes. 1 yes _no. huts down both supply air fans and related isolation dampersj yes _no. All labs required directional airflow is not maintained. 3 yes 9. 10. 11. Notes: (1 (3) (4) Restore the system to normal operation. Fail fans o. Expected resultam continues to operate shuts down. Both exhaust fan plenum dampers open 100%. a yes_ no. Lab suite maintains negative pressure to surrounding areas, 5 yes _no. All lab directional air ?ow is not maintained _yes 1111 no. Required strength to open exit doors from the lab suite is acceptable per NFPA 101 code for egress of occupants yes, l2, 3: no. Kill power to all four fans simultaneously was suggested. Expected results: Lab suite directional air?ow is not maintained 33 yes _no. Airflow patterns in the suits are directional to the cage wash area yes _no. Total containment is maintained and all directional air?ow is into the labs. Upon dual supply fan shut down, egress from the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force reduired to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also. on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader: it was necessary to pushrpull the door inwardloutward before turning the handle and opening the door. Pressure Differentials across Suite Egress Doors (b}(3}242 USE. 2523[h} Firel'Smoke Mode was not commissioned. During FireJSmoke Mode. dual supply fan shut down is commanded and stairwell pressurization fans start up and rtln. Exhaust fans run as described in ft 9 of the Car Report. The combination of excessive negative pressure on the lab ?oor and the pressurization of stairwells in Firemeoke Mode would cause the door opening forces mentioned in item #2 to increase signi?cantly. Air Analysis of Atlanta was informed by that the assumes responsibility for accepting the Vivarium to be reopened with known code violation. and will initiate a separate project to address this issue?. aaiif?a?l 4rev2 mama-am . uh?. - - MEANS OF EGRESS [ill?45 pair of doors is provided, not less than one of the doors shall provide not less than a 32-in. (81mm) clear width opening. Exception No. 1: Exit octets doors sowing room not exceeding :70 (6.5 m2) and not required to be oscessibic to {mono with severe mobii? icy impairments rhoii or not toss than 24 in. (til em) in door itof width. Exception No. 2: Doors serving it bitiiding or flortion thereof not re? quirod to be to flmons with severe impairments sitaii or omitted to be 23 in. (371 on} in door teofwidtn. Exception No. 3: In existing imiidings, the existing door toof width not Less than 23 in. {5?1 om). - Exception No. 4: This requirement shoti not apply as otherwise pro? _3 vided in Cilil?i?? 22ond 23. Fxcnition No. 5: This requirement Shelli not apply to interior doors on . pnruidsd in Chatter 24. Exoaotion No. 6: A power-operated door icdfiocoted within a: noo-Joof apmitigshoii be exempt from the: minimum 32in. 31 -onz singie-ieof reqttimnefnt in accordance: with Excqotion No. 2 to 12.1.9. Exception No. This requirement shoii not entity to remitting doors I as provided in 22.1.1'0. 7.2.1.3 Floor level. The elevation of the'iloor surfaces on lboth sides oi'a door shall not-var} by more than If: in. (1.3 cm). The elevation: shall he maintained on both sides of the doom]; for a distance not less than the width of the widest leaf. Thresholds at doonvays shall not exceed 1/2 in. [1.3 cm} in height. Raised thresholds and ?oor level changes in excess of If; in. (0.64 cm} at doorways shall be bevelled with. a sloEe not stecner than I in 2. Emotion No. i: In one end two-femiio dwoitings and in existing bedding: tons-re the door discharges to the outside or to on exterior boi- cmj: wetterior exit detest, the?oor i?l't?i outside the door shall be pen 1 nittsd to be one stop tower than the inside, but shott not its in excess of din. (20.3 on) tower: Winn No. 2.: In one and torofomiiv dreading: and existing Willie a door oi the top oft: stair shoii be pennitted to open directijt in Provided thot the door does not .noing oven the steir and the door 1' man one with on occupant tend offewer than. 50 persons. 1.2.14 and Force to Open. door in a means of egress shall be of the side- E: 0? Pivoted-sninging type. The door shall be designed 50 that it is capable of swinging from any posit-join .51 "3 mam-?11 l'Cq'LIiret] width of the opening in which it is moist t. . 1: 'Siiding doors es prooidod in Chatter: 22 and 23, .I tn Chapters 24, 32, end 33. We penned in Chapters l2 through 42., him"? - "mu! ?3ng security or doors that one port Egon: shalt be permitted, provided that the)! ?at. not going;- 5.- . passe-u. - - - .I: shall! remain steered in the ?rii open admit-orig by the gen emipuoiic. $933332 or door there shoii be roodiigt trit- iess than i in. (2.5 om} high on 1: tons 1 I. .4 Figs-n; .- it .TUREWOPEN Doors or griites shed in opmb?e?om within the spare without the use qfonj spotioi knowiedge or gifori. {it} Where troo ormore menus ofegress are required, not more then noifoftiie moons be equipped with itorizontoi siiding or notier roiling gritty: or doors. Exception No. 3: Hohhntoi siiding doors comparing with .14 sheii be permitted. Exception No. 4: Doors to initiate garages, business areas, industrial ones, ond storage owes with on occupant toad not exceeding l0, when: men fm'ooto garages, business ereos, indistinct! areas, and stor- age error contain tow or ordinary irritant contents, stint! be exempt from this requirement. Exception No. 5: Revolving doors complying with 12. Lit} shaft in permitted. Exception No. 6: Existing link?operated horizontal siiding or rig-nice! doors strait ilth permitted to or used a: provide in Chapters 12 through 42. 3b11143 Doors required to he of the side?hinged or pivoted- swinging type shall swing in the direction of as travel where serving a Ioomd?'dr area an occupant load of 50 at more. ?rd?H Exception No. 1: Door: in horizontal exits shoii not in: required. to hiring in the direction trees! where wounded in 12.4.3.5. Exception No. 2: Smoke borrin' doors shoii not be required to outing in the direction ofogress trottei es fmidod in Chapter 19. A door shall swing in the direction of egress travel where used in an exit enclosure or where serving a high haz- ard contents area, unless it is a door from an individual living unit that opens directly into an exit enclosure. $3134.43? During its swing, any door in a means of egress shall leave not less than one=half of the required width of an aisle, corridor, passa essay, or landing unobstructed and shall not project mere 'i in. (1728 cm) into the required width of an aisle, corridor, p??ewny, or landing, when fully open. DW- The landing shall have a width not less an e_ width of the door. {Sat 12.13.) Exception: In existing buildings, door providing access to stair shot! not be required to maintain on; minimum unobstructed width duringits sitting; provided that it meets the requirement that iimitspro- jeetion to not mm't? than. 5? in. (1'18 cm) into the required width ofo stoirorinnding when the door is?ttiy open. Edit-.3125, Theforees: reqnitecli? to 11111}i open-ens: door manually teeming otfegrosiinint not exceed liilhf N) to release the Intel-i, 3mg; (155.1%) to set the deer inmotion, and'15 [bf ('57 N) to open the door-to, the inini'mu??l Efluired width. Bpening forces for interior side-.hlngedor pivoted-sitinging doors tiithontzelosers shall not-exceed 5 {bf (22 N). These forces shall be applied at the latch stile. :?Noi force for etis ting" tiger: in existing Wrens tit-net see.- Enception No. 2: Tito oponingfortos for hm?izontoirsiiding ddors sit be as in Chofitorr 22 and 23. Exception No. 3: The owningforeetfor ?ower-operated doors shell in: in. 32.129. 12.1.4.6 Screen doors and storm doors used in a means of egress shall be eet to the requirements for direction of soaring that are applicable to other doors used in a means of egress. 2000 Edition 52.6 Examples 2 and 3 demonstrate that the air needed to prevent smoke back?ow can support an extremely large ?re. Most com- mercial and residential buildings contain enough ?iel (paper, card- board, fumiture, etc.) to support very large ?res. Even when the amount of fuel is normally very small, short-term fuel loads (dur- ing building renovation, material delivery, etc.) can be signi?cant. Therefore, using air?ow for smoke control is not recommended, except when the ?re is suppressed or in the rare cases when fuel can be restricted with confidence. Example 2. What air?ow at a doorway is needed to stop smolre hackt?lnw from a room fully involved in ?re, and how large a ?re can this air?ow support? A room full involved in ?re can have an energy release rate on the order of it a 1 Bush. Assume the door is 3 ft wide and 7 it high. From Equation {lit}, 163(3 lo?rsy? 790 than. A ?ow through the doorway of 19:] v: 3 16.60:] c?n is needed to prevent smoke from bach?owing into the area. If all the oxygen in this air?ow is oonstencd in the ?re, the heat lib- erated is 16,600 c?n .5350 Ruth 93 Btuih. This is over It] times more than the heat generated by the fully involved room ?re and indicates why air?ow is generally not recommended for smoke control in buildings. Example What airflow is needed to.stop smoke back?ow from a waste- hasl-ret ?re, and how large a fire can this air?ow support? A wastebaslret ?re can have an energy relse rate on the order of 105 Bush-As in Example 2. r, sears x, tetrst 31o fpm. a flow through the doonvay of3 Ill 3 3 c?n is needed to prevent smoke backfl aw. Ifail the oxygen in this air?ow is consumed in the ?re, the heat lib- crated is-ti?tlil arm-x Btul'htci'm as to? 13mm. This is still many times greater than the fully involved room fire and further indi? cates why air?ow is generally not recommended for smoke control in buildings. Buoyancy The buoyancy of hot combustion gases is used in both fan- powered and ndn-fan-powered venting systems. Fan-powered venting for large spaces is commonly used for atriums and coy. cred shopping malls, and venting is cominonly used for large industrial and storage buildings. There is a concern that sprinkler flow will cool the smoke, reducing buoyancy and thus the system effectiveness. Research is needed in this area. Refer to Klote and Millie (2002) and NFPA Standards 923 and 204 for detailed design information about these systems. SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN Do or?Opening Forces The door?openingt?orces resulting from the pressure differences pro ducedhy a smoke control system must be considered. Unreason- ably high door-opening forces can make it dif?cult or impossible for occupants to open doors to-refuge areas or escape routes. The force required to epen a door is the sum of the forces to over? come the pressure difference across the door and to overcome the door closer. This can be expressed as 5.20 WA dip ?ll/"til ii}: i: where total door-opening force, Fa, force to overcome door closer, lb,- 2 door widdt, ft A door hp pressure difference across door. in. of water 2? distance t?mm doorknob to edge ofiutob side of door, it This relation assumes that the door-opening force is applied at the knob. Door-opening force FF caused by pressure difference can an relatively small number-cl" tiists thit'. 2007 ASHRAE Handbook?HVAC Applications0.11 0.2 0,3 114 PRESSURE DIFFERENCE, in?lwatcr I Fig. 1 Door-Opening Force Caused by Pressure Difference; be determined from Figure 7 for a valtte of 3 in. The force to: overcome the-door cluster is usually greater than 3 and, in sdrne?- cases, can be as great as 20 lbf.,For a door that is ft high and 3,115; - wide and subject to a pressure difference of 0.30 in. or water, that: total door-opening force is 30 lbf, if- force to overcome the door .. closer is 12. lb;. Flow Areas - in designing smoke control systems, air?ow paths musthe ti?ed and evaluated. Some leakage paths are obvious, such as cracksi. 3' around closed doors, open doors, elevator doors, windows, and-aid: transfer grilles. Construction cracks in building walls are less ohvi??i: ens, but they are equally important. The flow area of most large openings, such as open windows-cam be calculated easily. Howover, ?ow areas of cracks are more dif?cult: to evaluate. The area of these leakage paths depends on such t?eamr'es 3 as workmanship, door and weatherstripping. A 3 by it door with an averageerackwidth ofll'? in. hasaleakagc area ofll.2] ?1.Hov.r'- 3' -- 53' ever, if this door is installed witha 3M in. undercut, the leakage area -.. is 0.3-5 E2, a signi?cant difference. The leakage area of elevator doors is in the range of 0.55 to 0.70 ft2 per door. For open stairwell doorways, Cresci (19'33) found complex flog?) Patten?; the fawning open doorways was considerably, below that calculated using the doorway?s geometric area as the area in Equation Based on this research, it is recommended dig the design ?ow area oi?an open stairwell doorway behalf the geomets. tie area [door height width) of the doorway. An alternative for open stairwell doonvays is to use due geometric area as the ?ow area use areduced ?ow coe?icient. Because it does not allow the direotusggr- of-Equation isnot hole. I earnestness! asses-ratius-=ia-Talils tints-an: basses; Reaearoit ICh'tiitc ii hf? Christie-{Shawl- etifal, 1953 and ?ljaivt lQT?a, 19?6h, 19T8;-Thmura and Wilson IQde. Actual leakage depend primarily on workmanship rather than on construction mate rials, and in some cases, the flow areas in particular buildings may vary from the values listed. Data concerning air leakage through building components are also provided in Chapter 27 of the ASHRAE emote. Because a vent surface is usually covered by slower and vent's flow area is less than its area {vent height width). Calculations, Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Browning, Daniel Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 1:2? PM rye Matte (?heater (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) 2023.0? objects. .. FW: - Vivarium Air Redirect Projeob'Anteroorns From: Browning, Daniel A. (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:09 PM To: Rogers, Barbara A. Cc: Browning?el A. Henderson, Joseph FW: - Vivarium Air Redirect ProjchAnterooms Barbara, The attached e-mails should not be a issue. Dan From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:10 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Browning, Daniel A. blwce Bowen Ken L. Raymond, George ba?za'm'??bject: l: Vivarium Air Redirect Here are. my emails pertaining to the above mention subject. . I 1x?- 3.. l: 2 Li: 05: 92009453 Fw': via: and Fw: van and RE: also a RE: vF0 and Re: ACH Rate RE: ACH Rate HOG Directive Schedule Meeting. . .Schedule Meeting. . .Schedule Meeting. . .Schedule Fw: ACH Rate RE: ACH Rate RE: ACH Rate RE: and RE: 'if'FD and RE: and RE: UFD and Schedule Meet'ng. . .Schedule Meeting. . .Scheclule 5. 4 "5 .. RE: and ivarium RE: and RE: W0 and RE: and Fw: VFD and Schedule Schedule Cons . edu. .. Schedule Meet?ng. . .Schedule ?g . M33 ?13 Si=0: VivariLIn Fw: Vivarium RE: [32009453 - RE: P2009453 - project project project ?Lfivarium project P200945. .. HOG Directive HOG Directive FW: FZUDQ453 - Re: P2CHJ9453 - HOG. Directive lb?iE, 42 us gg EEZarn I Fw:l j: I 09453 Vivarium Shutd. .. George K..Raymand HOG Directive. -. .. FW: The Project Facilities Mainteimnce and Engineering O?iee Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: 13?04 Atlanta, GA 30333 O?ee: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Celt-40459712599 RE: Buildii?ng El RE: Building h-?warium i mire-.242 usaa? 'wmdew Slat -- Screens I - Fw: Eu?din Vivarium Vivarium Schedule RE: The Praiecl: Fw: BFO CanFirmation of P/eaae maeia'ei? file eaw'mawear prim?z'ag #323 L's-waif Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bracewell, Jennifer K. Sent: Monday, July 02. 2012 2:04 PM To: Probst. Paul E. Raymond, George Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. .lue, Bruce R. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Subject: RE: 3 Final C): reports One more question. Could you soy. with certainty, of the time of building in the eyent of or fire olorm, that the AHU supply tons would shut down ond the exhoust tons keep running? And our documentation books-up your recollection? Thanks, Jennifer K. Broeewell. PMP Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rood MS-K80 Atlanta. Georgia 30333 720-488-2443 404-639?9111 to): 628~794~86li cell A creative men is motivated by the desire to ochreye, not by the desire to beat others. Ayn Rood From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCDUIBFO) Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 1:39 PM To: Bracewell, Jennifer K. Raymond, George Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Jue, Bruce R. aggrees?ject: RE: I:IFinal Cx reports We were hoping that would be the case also. But, as you can see from the e-mail I sent, my efforts to go back to both C): Agent and TAB Firm were fruitless. Thanks, Paul Probst From: Bracewell, Jennifer K. Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 12:48 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. CDCJOCOOIBFO) $323.13? meet: RE: Final Cx reports Thanks. I guess i wont to ask if the C): reports are where this informotion would be documented? Jennifer K. Brooewell. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road Atlanta. Georgia 30333 770-488-2443 404-6394?! 1 1 fax 678-794-861! cell A creative man is motivated by the desire to achieve. not by the desire to beat others. Ayn Read From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 9:55 AM To: Bracewell, Jennifer K. Raymond, George Walpole, Kenneth K. Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Subject: RE: Final Cx reports Jenn?ec We have hard copies are an the shelf over here all eleven volumes Each volume is approximately 3-4" thick. Not sure where else hard copies are readily available. If not over there. best bet is to come over. and pick out what you think is pertinent. Thanks. Paul Probst From: Bracewell, Jennifer K. Sent: Monday, July 02. 2012 9:51 AM To: Raymond Geore Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. stilt mat a reports Importance: High Guys. at the time of building acceptance. More importantly. are to call out documentation of the fire safetv mode of supply and exhaust fans 26am Le, an ?b??s??attic'g at the time of acceotance. This is in response to the Congressional Inquiry. Please let me know where I can find this information or email it to me ASAP. Thanks a Jennifer K. Bracewell. PMP Office of the Chief Operating Officer Buildings and Facilities Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road MS-KBO Atlanta. Georgia 30333 770-488-2443 404~639-9l ll fax 67'8-794-8611 cell :Imathe, Chester (coci'ocoorosee) From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday. July ?19, 2012 1:25 PM To: Williams,,J_efferv Jue, Bruce R. Cc: Raymond, George Bowen, Ken (CDCIOCOOIBFO) sea La?tte?! .. Egress Issues Proposed i124 Testing) We could however, my two cents is why measure the DP when I thought the reason for testing with pogo sticks (actual force} keeps us from making assumption needed to use the formula. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404-639-3303 Office 404?639-0499 Fax From: Williams,;Jeffery Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:58 AM To: Jue, Bruce R. Cc: Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. (CDCJOCODIBFO) 'E??iject; RE: Egress Issues Proposed 2/24 Testing) Just a thoUght: is there any value in measuring DP across the doors as well to determine the margin of error between calculated values of force and empirical testing results? Is this even practical or feasible during the tests. I believe there are several variables that may inflate the final force numbers when done by from DP values using the the ASHRAE formulas. From: Jue, Bruce R. Sent: 19, 2012 9:09 AM I n- . . Wigington, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIUCDOIBFO) Cc: Garner, Ron Raymond, George Powell, Steven L. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOO BFO - salt? grass Issues Proposed W24 Testing) All See below and provide feedback to the highlighted: 1. I have coordinated corrective action (installing new panel hardware, changing out field modules, and new hardware programming) for the FACP for this Saturday 2/21 No CDC announcement has been sent yet. 2. at the end we want_to_te_s_t withmatire alarm tomverifythat ?t_air__pre?suri?ation starts as originally designed. Bill-o Is:this okay our-should grif?n?til maimng 3. I suggest sending out one standard generic -CDC_annoUncement for FA testing that includes 2f21l3:00am? 2:00pm) and 7(24 Doe's: If so, i'll send it out today. 4. Derry! has yet to receive our order for additionalfnew door pressure scales. If they do not arrive before 7/24, we can always delayfreschedule this testing. From the attached matrix, we agreed to test #2 and #5 for the 5 doors listed plus an additional 3 doors. Paul - Can you get these door numbers and add them to the form? George - you may have to forward Paul your spreadsheet since we only hate the .PDF. 6. To recap our meeting from Tuesday concerning testing, Ken and I will initiat w/ the help of the FA, stair pressurization, and AHU sequences; Darryl and Ken will test doors; and and Bill will observe and record data. Comments/Do we all still agree? Concerning any doors that do not pass, if the failure is by 1.5 lbs. (for example: a reading of up to 35le force}, the {Jeff} has verbally agreed to granting a temporary variance until corrective actions can be taken. will have to send him an official CDC AHJ variance request that morning. If a door fails by more than 5 lbs., immediate corrective action will be needed by adding powered door assistance, installed by FSE work order. Comments/ Do we all still agree? Bruce From: Raymond, George Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 5:23 PM To: Jue, Bruce R. Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: Fw: Egress Issues FYI From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 04:56 PM To: Chandler, George Browning, Daniel A. Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Henderson, Joseph Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Egress Issues [bl[3}242 US. 262nm Door test script All, I have reviewed the information provided below and sustain the existing finding that the doors referenced below are not in compliance with NFPA 101 Life Safety Code section 7.2.1.4.5 under extreme egress scenario based on calculations performed from pressure differentials recorded during commissioning. The commissioning report dated March 2010 does stated:, ?Upon duaisupply shut down, egressfrom the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by The Commissioning (Cir) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive nego tive pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to push/pull the door in ward/outward before turning the handle and opening the door.? The commissioning report does not acknowledge the code-recognized steps required to open the door and the code required maximum allowable force for each step. The 15 maximum that is referenced in the commissioning report should only be applied to the maximum force required to release (openl the latch (Door Motion not the force required to open the door from a closed position. The code requires a maximum allowable force of 30 to set the door in motion from a sealed position to an open position [Door Motion 2), and 15 to open the door to the minimum required width [Door Motion 3). 2 262mm ifer the calculations provided in the commissioning report, each door tested meets or exceeds the code required 15 maximum to release the latch [Door Motion 1). However, three ofthe five doors tested do not meet the 30 maximum allowable force to set the door in motion (Door Motion 2) during the most extreme condition/multiple equipment failure egress scenario. This is a violation of NFPA 101 section and the data is derived from door ?opening force calculations based on the differential pressures recorded during commissioning. Exception No. 1 ofthis section of the code states the following: "The openingforcefor existing doors in existing buildings shall not exceed a 50 ibf (222 N) applied to the latch stile?. Per review and interpretation of the this exception does not apva in this case since the building was not considered an ?existing building? when it was built in 2005 per NFPA 101-1997. The maximum 50-Ibf (222 N) operating requirement of earlier editions (pm-1988] ofthe Code remains applicable only to existing doors. The following corrective actions will be performed as soon as the program schedule can accommodate entry into this area for testing and adjustments: 1. Adjust the door closure force on affected doors to under 5 and perform empirical test of doors under testing scenarios identified in the attachment to determine actual compliance with applicable safety codes. Ensure that biological containment is maintained and that the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 2. If necessary, install new door closers that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to ensure that biological containment is maintained and to allow the doors to meet code. Perform empirical test of doors to ensure biological containment is maintained and that the actual performance of the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 3. if necessary, install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door and ensure these doors will meet biological containment parameters and be in compliance with Life Safety Code requirements during the highly unlikely but certainly possible event of a multiple equipment failure egress scenario. Perform empirical tests to ensure actual performance meets Life Safety Code Requirements. Please note that BFO and OSHE will be conducting actual door tests and will either confirm a violation or indicate that we are not in violation at all. At present we are taking a conservative approach since both sets of calculated data suggest a violation under extreme failure/egress conditions. Jeff Williams Deputv Director! AHJ 770.438.8089 From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:00 PM To: Chandler Geore Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. mis?tEgress Issues George, A stated earlier today FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors in iyarium. Paul sent an email to Jeff Williams on 1f20l2011 asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response, we (FMEO) viewed the letter of the code was applicable. The Commissioning report stated: "the force required to open doors during fan failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15lbf. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount {45lbl}. As Paul stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.3.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization sh all use and approved engineered system with a design pressure difference across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklered buildings or .1 in water column in nonsprinlrlered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure di?erence under likely conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure dr??erence across doors shall errceed that which allows the door to begin to open a force of 30lbf in accordance with 7.2.14.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed 15lbf to release the latch, 30lbf to set the door in motion, and 15lbf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed 5lbf. These forces shall be applied to the latch stile.? "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed 50lbf applied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 15 bf to engage the latch on the door, 301bf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, {50lbf in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12/28/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door Opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure Operation lb)(3)242 USE. 252301} Based on this our worst door is 8 bs over code. We will perform extensive test in this are the second week in July 2012. Options: With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception ofthe code, the doors are in compliance. 4 I No action required 2. lfthe Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a sUppIy fan failure condition; Intact-.42 us 252mm I I Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under 0 Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. 0 Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assistin opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. . 3. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. {bythe way he doesn?t reference the section ofthe code) then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; a On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. I Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. 0 install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. ?2 message: FW:'l:l Vivarium Egress Message: FW: Vivarium Egress George K. Raymond Deputy Director Maintenance and Engineering O?ce Can rers for Disease Controi and Prevention 1600 Cii?on Reed, N.W., MS: Atlanta, GA 30333 O?i?ce: 404.639.3335 Fex: 404.639.1635 car.- 4045912599 #9 Pieere consider the erreimeereei ibis sewer? Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Browning, Daniel A. (CDCIDCODIDSEP) Sent: Tuesday. August 2012 1:29 PM To: Maine. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Subject: FW: Doors Code Issue From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, August (11, 20-12 9:2? PM To: Browning, Daniel A. Henderson, Joseph (CDCIOCDOIOSEP) Doors Code Issue uses 2523i [1 Z- I i?iiglli? .-.. -- - ivm?u. . . FW: Results of Fw: LCM Auto Door FW: Results of Results of Door mm? Testing in 2623i ii: (I 4.. 'i RE: Building FW: Budding FW: LCN Auto Door Fw: Building Egress Issues Egress Issues Openers Egress Issues Kl In: - . RE: ivorium Egress gress grass [hi- 262mm - gress Egress 'veriurn gress Door Closers a a. I warium Egress Egress Egress Draft Code E5 Testing Eff? RE: Building Egress Issues E. . RE: Building Egress RE: Vivarium Egress gress Testing FW: Building El Egress Issues Building El Egress testing. i=w Vivarium gress l. .. Egress Vivarium Draft. . Hi irise'li'Door Results of Door RE: Results of Deer RE: Results of Door Testing E: W: Buildingl? Egress Issues RE: lireriurn Egress a- l? FW: Hiveriurn Egress Egress .. Re: Draft. us os .. 25.26.} i] US Ci.? . 115 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Tuesday, Jul},I 31, 2012 1:31 PM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Raymond, George Joe, Bruce R. Branch, Ivan Garner, Ron (CDCIOCDOIBFO) - Ford, Maria Cristin CIOCOOIBFO) $553;? ect'. -- - DoorE ivariurn Let?s get together at 2pm in our conference room in I320. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-639-3303 Office 404?639?0499 Fax From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:25 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Jue, Bruce R. Branch, Ivan Garner, Ron (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Ford, Maria Cristina (CDCIOCOOIBFO) (?53,154? RE: Stainveil-Door-EMvai-ium I think that a panic bar with a switch can be installed on the HCL side that can operate the power assisted operator. All this can be installed on the door itself and you don?t have to drill through the well. But I don?t know if this is code compliant or not or if a panic bar even exists that has a set of contacts in it but i would think it does. From: Probst, Paul Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:19 PM To: Powell, Steven L. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Jue, Bruce R. Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Garner, Ron (CDCIOCDOIBFD) Cc: Ford, Maria Cristina (CDC OCOOIBFO) Stairwe? .Door-blivarium This is what happens when we gunsling Thanks, Paul Probst From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 12:55 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Jue, Bruce R. Branch, IVan Garner, Ron (secretes/am) Cc: Ford, Maria Cristina OCDDIBFU) Stairwell Door-I ifivarium Gentlemen, i think a meeting needs to be held to discuss how to install this power assisted door to make sure everyone is on the same page BEFORE FSE drills through the concrete wall to install a power latch on these doors. Steven Powell FM E0 Building Manager 404-639-1573 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, Jul).I 31, 2012 1:25 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFDL Jue. Bruce R. Branch, Ivan Garner, Ron (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Ford, Maria Cristina Subject: RE: Stairwell Door ivarium i think that a panic bar with a switch can be installed on the side that can operate the power assisted operator. All this can be installed on the door itself and you don't have to drill through the wall. But 1 don?t know if this is code compliant or not or if a panic bar even exists that has a set of contacts in it but I would think it does. From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:19 PM To: Powell, Steven L. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Jue, Bruce R. Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Garner, Ron Cc: Ford, Maria Cristina (CD CIIQCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Stairwell Doc s2 Vivarium This is what happens when we gunsling Thanks, Paul Probst From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 12:55 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Jue, Bruce R. Branch, Ivan Garner, Ron (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Cc: Ford, Maria Cristina Subject: Stairwell Doc :43; Vivarium Gentlemen, I think a meeting needs to be held to discuss how to install this power assisted door to make sure everyone is on the same page BEFORE FSE drills through the concrete wall to install a power latch on these doors. Steven Powell FM E0 Building Manager 404-639-1578 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Tuesday. July 31, 2012 1:02 PM To: Powell, Steven L. Probst. Paul E. Raymond, George Jue, Bruce R. Branch. Ivan (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Garner, on (CDCECOOIBFO) I. . RE:Stairwel Door 03:42 ivarium Cc: Ford. Marla Subject: I'm free this afternoon. Thanks. Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404639-3303 Office 404?639-0499 Fax From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 12:55 PM To: Probs?c, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Jue, Bruce R. Branch, Ivan Garner, Ron Cc: Ford, Maria Cristina I OCOOIBFO) Subject: Stairwell Doc ivarium Gentlemen, I think a meeting needs to be held to discuss how to install this power assisted door to make sure everyone is on the same page BEFORE FSE drills through the concrete wall to install a power latch on these doors. Steven Powell FMED Building Manager 404-639?15?8 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 12:55 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Jue, Bruce R. Branch, Ivan (CDCIOCODIBFO) Garner, Ron Cc: Ford. Marie C. Tr . (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: Stainvell Door Vivarium Gentlemen, - . I think a meeting needs to be held to discuss how to install this power assisted door to make sure everyone is on the same page BEFORE FSE drills through the concrete wall to install a power iatch on these doors. Steven Powell FM E0 Building Manager 404-639-1578 Ibh314 252mb Mathe. Chester (CDCIOCOOIDSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:19 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George (CDCIOCO Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) @9142 ?3 92523 Jue. Bruce R. (cociocoorsro) i Cc: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: RE: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium So the only item we need to do on this door is to change the lock type. put the W0 in. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-639-3303 Office 404-6390499 Fax From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:04 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Ravmond. Georo Kenneth K. (sociocoorsrox Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocooxosus) 5? Bruce R. (CDCIOCOOXBFD) Subject: RE: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium Walpole, Jue, AE Conversation (Todd Queary of yields that this is not an egress door, and reversing door is not necessary. Thanks. Paul Probst From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 ?:49 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Raymond. George Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) ?3 Subject: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium al File: door te5t2.pdf File: door test1.pdf>> Emits of the door pressure testing for egress in the vivarium accomplished on July 24, 2012 are as follows: North Entry Door to North Stair #3 failed. A power assisted door operator will be installed on this door to overcome the force of the stair pressurization fan during egress. Clean Corridor to L0 Stair failed. A power assisted door operator will be installed on this door to overcome the force of the stair pressurization fan during egress. lbll3}. 262th - South Entry to Clean Corridor failed. Cardkev locking mechanism will be changed out. Contact AE of record to determine if door was intended as egress door. Investigate possibility of reversing door swing to coincide with egress path out of clean corridor to southeast from Vivarium space. All other doors tested passed. Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-539-1578 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst. Paul E- (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:04 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E- Raymond, George Howard, William {Bill} St (coprocooi'OSHE); Jue, Bruce R. Subject RE: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium AE Conversation (Todd (ltuearyr of HDRICUHEA) yields that this is not an egress door, and reversing door is not necessary. Thanks, Paul Probst From: Powell, Steven L. (CDQOCCOXBFO) Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 ?:49 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Prohst, Paul E. Ravmond. Georcle Walpole, Kenneth K. (coprocoorBFO); Howard, William (Bill) (CDC/ocoorosuE); 531%)? US 5 (coo/ocooroSl-la) Subject: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium or a, - trim door test2.de door testt .de The results of the door pressure testing for egress in the vivarium accomplished on July 24, 2012 are as follows: ?it:prlo Entry Door to North Stair #3 failed, A power assisted door operator will be installed on this door to a - . he force of the stair pressurization fan during egress. $322? Clean Corridor to LC Stair failed. A power assisted door operator will be installed on this door to overcome the I the stair pressurization fan during egress. - South Entry to Clean Corridor failed. Cardkev locking mechanism will be changed out. Contact AE of record to determine if door was intended as egress door. Investigate possibility of reversing door swing to coincide with egress path out of clean corridor to southeast entrviexit from Vivarium space. All other doors tested passed. Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639-1573 AHU DUAL FAN FAILURE {No Buiiding Firel?larm, AHU Off, EF Minimum, Stair Pressurizatinn Off} Lbs-3:42 uses 2523f? North Entry to North Stair #3 est 1 Test (55:31:42 uses .. new Room to North Entry est 1 Test Clean Corridor to North Entry Test 1 Test 0.15 lbw-42 . . . 26234.; Clean Corrldor to LC Stair Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.3? 4"Ci'ean Gage-to Clean-Vestibule. Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 27.5 12s'Clean Ves-ti-buleto-Sooth?ntry Test 1 est 2 Test Test 1 est 2 Test .27 15"Lbs' '10 12 DP to Cl'ea'nforridoe Test. 1 Test 2 Test 41.28 41:13.42 us 43:13:42 uses . use 5 $132.42 US es . GENERAL FIRE ALARM WITH AHU SHUTDOWN [Bldg FA, AHU Off, EF Minimum, Stair Press. On) North Entry to North Stair #3 Clea n-Eage-tu C-lean-Uestibu le. . .. . 0 Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.42 DP 43.015 I 23}. . 5.73.5 QbBEalli'? i .. De?Con Room to North Entry,r -- .. Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.13 DP -0.15 anal-5331:? a - Gear! Corridor to North Entw Tower Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 1115 DP 0.15 [Dr-13342 - . [beat-'12 LIE C. 262mb: . . Clean Corrldor to LC Stair -- Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.55 DP 4122 - Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Walpoienhienneth K. Howard, William (Bill) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIEFO) Sent: Tuesday, Julyr 24, 2012 11:04 AM To: ibit3ii42 UE-C (cocrocoorsFoi 252% I Subject: RE: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium Jue, Bruce R. AE Conversation (Todd Queary of HDRICUH2A) yields that this is not an egress door, and reversing door is not necessary. Thanks, Paul Probst From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 2:49 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) (CDCIOCOOIOSHE): Subject: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium I door test2.pdf door testt .pdf FEEL 5 I I the force of the stair pressurization fan during egress. force of the stair pressurization fan during egress. {artist 42 so 262aih} OCOOIOSH E) of the door pressure testing for egress in the vivarium accomplished on July 24, 2012 are as follows: -North Entry Door to North Stair #3 failed. A power assisted door operator will be installed on this door to Clean Corridor to LC Stair failed. A power assisted door operator wiII be installed on this door to overcome the - South Entry to Clean Corridor failed. Cardkev locking mechanism will be changed out. Contact AE?of record to determine if door was intended as egress door. investigate-possibility of reversing door swing to coincide with egress path out of clean corridor to southeast from Vivarium space. All other doors tested passed. Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639-1578 AHU DUAL FAN FAILURE Building Fire-Alarm, AHU Off, EF Minimum, Stair Pressurizatian Off] ens-Ears? US 51 North Entry to North Stair #3 Clean Cage te-Glea-n Vestibule . .. Test 1 Test 2 Test 3' Test 1 Test 2 Test 12-U.02 555:1}? U'Sfcifi. -- - De?Cun Room to North Entry Halli Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.13 DP -0.15 $552.31? - Clean Corridor to North Entry uth EnthI . . .. .. Ufs Ci Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 est 1 est 2 Test 1'5'Lbs-0.15 DP libeh?ia'nii U5 5 -- - Clean Corridor to LC Stair - Clean-Gems?. . Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.3? DP 41.23 GENERAL FIRE ALARM WITH AHU [Bldg FA, AHU Off, EF Minimum, Stair Press. [In] gala-'1? U5 North Entry to North Stair #3 Cage-to . Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test {1.42 DP 43.015 '39.-ch Room ta North Entry s-?igan-yes?bme m. 59mm Ella-Lag Test 1 Test 2 est 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test -D.15 U513 252alh2- . (jean Corridor to North Entw tn . 23.23111 Test 1 Test 2 est 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.15 Ibb3s42 I15 0 q, 2524??: -- Clean Corridor tb LC Stair s-Seuth Entry-"to Clean..Corridbr . Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.55 DP 43.27 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:00 AM To: Joe, Bruce R. Subject: FW: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium Thanks, Paul Probst From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 ?:49 AM - To: Bowen, Ken L. Paul E. Pavnjiopd Genme Walpole, Kenneth K. (cocrocooraFo); Howard, William (Bill) (gag; 5 gcocro coorosu E) Subject: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium we" door test2.pdf door testl .pdf its of the door pressure testing for egress in the vivarium accomplished on July 24, 2012 are as follows: North Entry Door to North Stair #3 failed. A power assisted door operator will be installed on this door to 5 the force of the stair pressurization fan during egress. Clean Corridor to LC Stair failed. A power assisted door operator will be installed on this door to overcome the WW he stair pressurization tan during egress. 2523's.. South Entry to Clean Corridor failed. Cardkey looking mechanism will be changed out. Contact AE of record to determine if door was intended as egress door. investigate possibility of reversing door swing to coincide with egress path out of clean corridor to southeast from Vivarium space. All other doors tested passed. Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404-639-1573 AHU DUAL FAN FAILURE [No Building Fire Alarm, AHU Off, EF Minimum, Stair Pressurization Off] $635353? US 0 - North Entry' to North Stair #3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.2 Eng-59:32:? US C- - De?Con Room to North Entry Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.13 .. - Clean Corridor to North Entrv Test 1 Test 2 I Test 15155] ?11 13 h? DP 0.15 2523'?? -- - Clean Corridor to LC Stair Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 15 4 4 21 30th .0.3? 15 15 Test Entry: Test 1 Test 2 Test -0.15 .. Tutti-?c! Test 1 Test 2 Test 1515s? '5 "15 ?12' DP 0.23 South Entry! to Clean Corridor. Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 15Lbs 43.28 5 '3 3 .. runs;_42 us as [55:33:42 nuns-.42 uses GENERAL FIRE ALARM WITH AHU SHUTDOWN {Bldg FA, AHU Off, EF Minimum, Stair Press. On) uses I liar-[314211335 2523"? - - North Entry to North Stair #3 'Clesi'n' cage to GES'?'Ves?bul?e -- Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Te st 2 Test 0.42 DP 43.015 mes.- 42 uses uses 2523"? De-Cbn Room to North Entry ri?ean Ve's'tib'u'le tb? Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Te'St 2 Test 0.13 DP -0.15 Clean Corridor to North Entry Gush- Lt U530 5 Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.15 DP 0.15 meme use. 5 $913342 U-5 53 262m?: . - Clean Corridor to LC Stair Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test.2 Test '540 540 MID 21-40 15 5 7 DP 0.55 DP 41-2? Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEPJ From; Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Tuesday. July 24, 2012 8:09 AM To: Chandler, George (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFCH Subject: FW: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium Here are the results from this morning tests and the solution to ?x it. Thanks, Ken Bowen Directorfor Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404-639-3303 Of?ce 404?639-0499 Fax From: Powell, Steven L. Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 ?:49 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) Eggs? U5 Subject: Results of Door Testing in ld?ivarium door test2.de door testLde The results of the door pressure testing for egress in the vivarlum accomplished on July 24, 2012 are as follows: ?39% orth Entry Door to North Stair #3 failed. A power assisted door Operator will be installed on this door to a the force of the stair pressurization fan during egress. Clean Corridorto LC Stair failed. A power assisted door operator will be installed on this door to overoome the force of the stair pressurization fan during egress. $331; South Entry to Clean Corridor failed. Cardkey locking mechanism will be changed out. Contact AE of record to determine if door was intended as egress door. Investigate possibility of reversing door swing to coincide with egress path out of clean corridor to southeast from Vivarium space. All other doors tested passed. .hilBr-t 2B2alh, toils-4 252m; Steven Powell FMEO Building Manager 404?639-1573 U5 CI . . 262m: North Entry to North Star #3 AHU DUAL FAN FAILURE (No Building FirelAlarm, AHU Off, EF Minimum, Stair Pressurization Off} Test 1 Test 2 Test {1.2 [11131142 USE. 2523?": De-Con Room to North Entry Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.13 [13.53.1142 USE-.5 252m?: - Clean Corridor to North Entry Test 1 Test 2 Test ""21 0.15 151:3}:42 use . 252mm Clean tender to Stalr ESTClean "liege 'to {Teen -Ves-tibu-le-- -- Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 15 6 6 2.5 30 1243.02 clean South En Test 1 Test 2 Test Lbs' 1 11 DP -0.15 . LC . Test 1. Test 2 Test :27 151131? ?3 ?15" ?Hi2: DP 0.23 'S'ooth'Entrv-to Eleen- Corridor -- -- Test 1 Test 2 Test -0.28 Zeb}: $13,142 US 91' [1'4 1513.142 I15 05 $213142 .. 262mb; GENERAL FIRE ALARM AHU SHUTDOWN {Bldg FA, AHU Off, EF Minimum, Stair Press. On) [bl-[3142 HE C. North Entry to North Stair #3 252mm; .. 42 US 2B2arl1: $135242 15 30 15 Test 1 5 23 13 estDe?Con Room to North Entry Test 1 Test 2 Test 1113 - Clean Corridor to North Entry Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.15 Clean Corridor to LC Stair Test 1 Test 2 Test '35 37" >40 DP- 0.55 Test 1 Test 2 Test 43.015 .. Clean vestibule?, g9 ?thu?ntry. Test 1 Test 2 Test -o.15 .. ._..South.EntW ?ante. Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.15 to-Eleantorridot. .. Test 1 Test 2 Test 10.2? U3 1.2.5.2511]; .. [5135242 2.52am; 15135.42 Z?g?lhi .. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Powell, Steven L. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday. July 24, 2012 7:49 AM To: Bowen, Ken L. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George . Howard1 William (Bill) {mt-3} 42 SC ?2523tm Subject: Results of Door Testing in Vivarium . . door testz. de door testl .de The results of the door pressure testing for egress in the vivarium accomplished on July 24, 2012 are as follows: gig-?forth Entry Door to North Stair #3 failed. A power assisted door operator will be installed on this door to overcome the force of the stair pressurization fan during egress. $6233}; Clean Corridor to LC Stair failed. A power assisted door operator will he installed on this door to overcome the force of the stair pressurization fan during egress. $332? South Entry to Clean Corridor tailed. Cardkey locking mechanism will be changed out. Contact AE of record to determine if door was intended as egress door. investigate possibility of reversing door swing to coincide with egress path out of clean corridor to southeast from Vivarium space. All other doors tested passed. Steven Powell FMED Building Manager 404-639-15?3 DUAL r414 FAILURE (No Building eramarrn, art, EF Minimum, Stair pressurization cm] LIE-G North Entry to North Stair #3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.2 @6142 US. .E: 25231?? - De-Cnn Room to North Entry Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.13 US. mm - Clean Corridor to North Entry Test 1 Test 2 Test 3_ 15 4 1 ..15.. 1 - DP 0.15 $35111? Clean Corridor to Le Stair Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 15 4 4 4 30 ""34 35 3'3 15. 33 32": 31 0.3? .. Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 15 5 15 30 12-a.02 - . ._.Elean . ?Test 1 Test 2 Test -0_.15 - ?outh Entry to LC Tower lb ll?- 1:42 USEE 2.6.2 :31 42 HE: C: z?zaina ?313;:42 IJ [bust-:42 user; Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 15 - 10 9 30 --24 27 27 is ?its? ?12 DP 0.23 l-Iigouth Entry to Clean Carri-Hour Test 1 Test 2 Test 41.23 GENERAL FIRE ALARM AHU SH UTDOWN (Bldg FA, AHU Off, EF Minimum, Stair Press. 0n] $521332 0- - North Entry to North Stair #3 Cage-"to Clean Vestibule. . . HIS Cg Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.42 DP -D.D 2523??: - [lie-Con Room to North Entry,r - Clean Vestibule to South Entry Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.13 DP -D.15 rill-[3342 252mb; clean Corridor to North Entry -- Eniw .. Elisetbs Test 1 Test 2' Test 3 ?Test 1 Test 2 Test 0.15 DP 0.15 332313252m?? - - - Clean Corridor to LC Stair - South Entry to Clean Corridor Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test .5140 > Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 2:34 PM To: Williams, Jeffery Jue, Bruce R. Probst. Paul E. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Raymond. George Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) .. REL. gress Issues Proposed 7224 Testing) Let us see if we have a DP meter that is calibrated? Paulthey do have them bring it to the test? Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404?639-3303 Of?ce 404?639-0499 Fax From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:35 PM To: Bowen, Ken L. Jue, Bruce R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) 299:, ?233: SuhE?eaet: --R-E-:--Egress Issues Proposed 2/24 Testing) I don?t disagree. it?s your call. I was just thinking out loud that if this whole claim of code violation was predicated on sales derived from DP measurements, then I would like to have some idea of the level of accuracy the calculated methodology yields. It would only be done secondary to actuaI force measurements, as taken by a door pressure gage/pogo stick. From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:25 PM To: Williams, Jeffery Jue, Bruce R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) I Cc: Raymond George Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCODIBFO) RE: .. Egress Issues Proposed 7/24 Testing) We could however, my two cents is why measure the DP when reason for testing with pogo sticks [actual force) keeps us from making assumption needed to use the formula. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-539?3303 Office 404-639?0499 Fax Eo?alh} From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:58 AM To: Jue, Bruce R. gg?gaymond George Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Subject:..RE.: . Egress Issues Proposed 7124 Testing) Just a thought: is there any value in measuring DP across the doors as well to determine the margin of error between calculated values of force and empirical testing results? Is this even practical or feasible during the tests. I believe there are several variables that may inflate the ?nal force numbers when done by from DP values using the the ASH RAE formulas. From: Joe, Bruce R. (CDCKOCOOKBFO) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:09 AM E. Wigington, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. IbM3s42 2523HU Howard, William (Bill) Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Powell, Steven L. Williams, I Ject; Egress Issues Proposed W24 Testing) All See below and provide feedback to the highlighted: 1. I have coordinated corrective action (installing new panel hardware, changing out field modules, and new hardware programming} for the FACP for this Saturday No CDC announcement has been sent yet. 2. At the end we want to test with alfire alarm to verify that stair pressurization starts as originally designed. sis-5;} slr?'?i?i?md m9er lawlessness) 3. suggest sending out one standard generic announcement for FA testing that includes 7/21 (8:00am- 2:00prn} and W244 If so, I'll send it out today. 4. Darryl has yet to receive our order for additio?ajalew door pressure scales. If they do not arrive before 7/24, we can always delay! reschedule this testing. {haughty} 5- Breathe attached mates its. esseeiisted pluses sd?itiewl.3?sors- i??sl?f .333 ro?raetTihese dodr genres -. we mama?s: ?owed Pastiwi Siaseneeslr_havs_ih_e. ?05 6. To recap our meeting from Tuesday concerning testing, Ken and I will initiate the help of the FA, stair pressurization, and AHU sequences; Darryl and Ken will test doors;.anand Bill will observe and record data. Eo?rng?t-sfp?welall still "agree: 7. Concerning any doors that do not pass, ifthe failure is by 1-5 lbs. (for example: a reading of up to 35 bs force], the AHJ (Jeff) has verbally agreed to granting a temporary variance until corrective actions can be taken. I will have to send him an official CDC AHJ variance request that morning. If a doorfails by more than 5 lbs., immediate corrective action will be needed by adding powered door assistance, installed by FSE work order. Bruce {bs3142 262mhi From: Raymond, George Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 5:23 PM T9: Jue, Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. guiliect: - Egress Issues From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 04:56 PM To: Chandler, George Browning, Daniel A. Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Henderson Joseh Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. RE: Egress Issues (exalt-42 csu sc Door test script 262ath Ail, have reviewed the information provided below and sustain the existing finding that the doors referenced below are not in compliance with NFPA 101 Life Safety Code section 12.1.4.5 under extreme egress scenario based on calculations performed from pressure differentials recorded during commissioning. The commissioning report dated March 2010 does statedz, "Upon duai supply shut down, egress from the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by CD The Commissioning {Ex} Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors durin suppiy fan faiiure does not meet the ?Nationoi Fire Protection iflgencyr 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 ibs. The di?erentiai pressure measured across egress doors correSponded to a force greater than three times that of the aiiowabie force per code. Aiso, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the I release of the eiectronic security iatch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to push/puff the door inward/outward before turning the handle and opening the door.? The commissioning report does not acknowledge the code?recognized steps required to open the door and the code required maximum allowable force for each step. The 15 maximum that is referenced in the commissioning report should only be applied to the maximum force required to release {open} the latch (Door Motion not the force required to open the door from a closed position. The code requires a maximum allowable force of 30 to set the door in motion from a sealed position to an open position {Door Motion 2), and 15 to open the door to the minimum required width (Door Motion 3). Per the calculations provided in the commissioning report, each door tested meets or exceeds the code required 15 maximum to release the latch (Door Motion However, three of the ?ve doors tested do not meet the 30 maximum allowable force to set the door in motion [Door Motion 2] during the most extreme conditionfmultiple equipment failure egress scenario. This is a violation of NFPA 101 section 12.1.4.5, and the data is derived from door ?openin,s,r force calculations based on the differential pressures recorded during commissioning. Exception No. 1 of this section of the code states the following: ?The openingforcefor existing doors in existing buiidings shall not exceed a 50 ibf {222 N) appiied to the iatch stiie?. F?er review and interpretation of the this exception does not apva in this case since the building was not considered an ?existing building? when it was built in 2005 per NFPA 101-1997. The maximum 50-lbfl222 operating requirement of earlier editions {pm-1988) of the Code remains applicable only to existing doors. The following corrective actions will be performed as soon as the program schedule can accommodate entry into this area for testing and adjustments: 1. Adjust the door closure force on affected doors to under 5 and perform empirical test of doors under testing scenarios identified in the attachment to determine actual compliance with applicable safety codes. Ensure that biological containment is maintained and that the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 2. If necessary, install new door closers that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to ensure that biological containment is maintained and to allow the doors to meet code. Perform empirical test of doors to ensure biological containment is maintained and that the actual performance of the doors meet Life Safetyr Code requirements. 3. if necessary, install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door and ensure these doors will meet biological containment parameters and be in compliance with Life Safety Code requirements during the highly unlikely but certainly possible event of a multiple equipment failure egress scenario. Perform empirical tests to ensure actual performance meets Life Safety Code Requirements. Please note that BFO and OSHE will be conducting actual door tests and will either confirm a violation or indicate that we are not in violation at all. At present we are taking a conservative approach since both sets of calculated data suggest a violation under extreme failure/egress conditions. Jeff Williams Deputy Director i From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:00 PM To: Chandler Geor Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Went: Egress Issues George, A stated earlier today FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors inl:l\iivariurn. Paul email to Jeff Williams on ?Ii20l20?l?i asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response, we viewed the letter of the code was applicable- The Commissioning report stated: "the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the Na tional Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is i?lb? The dih?erential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45ibU. As stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.3.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure difference across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklered buildings or .I in water column in nonsprinldered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure de?eren ce under likely conditions ofstack ejj?ect or wind. The pressure di??erence across doors shall exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by a force of 30lbf in accordance with 7.2.1.45? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.1.4.5 it states; ?The forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed ISibf to release the la tch, 30lbf to set the door in motion, and 15 ihf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or piuo ted swinging door with out closure shall not exceed Eih?- These forces shall be applied to the latch stile. "Exception No. the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed 50be applied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 15 bf to engage the latch on the door, BUlbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, {SUlbf in and existing building}, 15 pounds to fully openthe door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12128/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation 42 US 252mm Based on this our worst door is Bibs over code. We will perform extensive test in this are the second week in July 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception ofthe code, S?ibs, the doors are in compliance. 0 No action required 2. if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan I Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under - install new door closure that will red Uce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. 0 Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a suppr fan failure condition. 3. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation ofthe code is correct. (by the way he doesn?t reference the section of the code) then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; 5 II On a supply' fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. - Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. a Install a deer assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. llJ}If31?l2 US I: 252mm Message:- Egress Message: FW:Vivariun1 Egress George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O?ice Centers for Disease Can trel and Preaentien 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., M57 13-04 Atlanta. GA 30333 O??ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.591.2599 5% News seaside? ri?e enaimnxnenr Keefeiepriniina fiber e-inaii Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 12:30 PM To: Powell, Steven L. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Cc: (CTR) Sub'ect: . a ,Egress Issues Proposed 7124 Testing) Door test script 7-1-12.pdi Steve: You will need to be a part of this Tuesday morning at 4 am. lvan, 1 will need 2 FSE people who may have to adjust door closers. Thanks, Paul Probst From: Jue, Bruce R. Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:09 AM To: Probst Paul E. Wigington, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. . . Howard, William (Bill) Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Garner, Ron Raymond, George Powell, Steven L. Williams, r?nniHFm 252ai?rgubject: Egress Issues Proposed N24 Testing) All See below and provide feedback to the highlighted: 1. I have coordinated corrective action (installing new panel hardware, changing out field modules, and new hardware programming} for the FACP for this Saturday 71/21 No CDC announcement has been sent yet. 2. At the end we want to test with a fireala rm to verify that stair pressurization starts as originally designed. 3. I suggest sending out one standard generic CDC announcement for FA testing that includes 7f21l8:00am- 2:00pm) and 7,94 If so, I?ll send it out today. ii. Darryl has yet to receive our order for addi?tignnamlmew door pressure scales. If they do not arrive before 7/24, we can always delay/reschedule this testing. I 5= From the attached matris we agreed retest. ??rst! P'Ussn wm same are marinate. t6 75pteas5.hests'tns.ssrs E. To recap our meeting from Tuesday concerning testing, Ken and I will initiate (or the help of the FA, stair pressurization, andAHD squences; Darryl and Ken will test doors; and and Bill will observe and record data. mantel/Dottie agree? 7. Concerning any doors that do not pass, if the failure is by 1-5 lbs. [forexample a reading of up to 35Ibs force), the (Jeff) has verbally agreed to granting a temporary variance until corrective actions can be taken. I will have to send him an of?cial CDC AHJ variance request that morning. lfa door fails by more than 5 lbs., action will, be needed by adding powered door assistance, installed by FSE work order. ems-sear; Bruce From: Raymond, George (CDCIDCODIBFD) Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 5:23 PM To: Jue, Bruce R. Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Egress Issues FYI From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 04:56 PM To: Chandler, George Browning, Daniel A. Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOIDSHE) Cc: Henderson Joseh Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) w??'bject; RE: i Egress Issues statistics test script All, I have reviewed the information provided below and sustain the existing finding that the doors referenced below are not in compliance with NFPA 101 Life Safety Code section 7.2.1.4.5 under extreme egress scenario based on calculations performed from pressure differentials recorded during commissioning. The commissioning report dated March 2010 does statedz, "Upon dual down, egress from the 1v?ivarium was deemed unacceptable by The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The di?feren tial pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded the card reader; it was necessary to push/pull the door inward/outward before turning the handle and opening the door.? The commissioning report does not acknowledge the code-recognized steps required to open the door and the code required maximum allowable force for each step. The 15 maximum that is referenced in the commissioning report should only be applied to the maximum force required to release [open] the latch (Door Motion not the force required to open the door from a closed position. The code requires a maximum allowable force of 30 to set the door in motion from a sealed position to an open position (Door Motion 2), and 15 Ibfto open the door to the minimum required width (Door Motion 3). Per the calculations provided in the commissioning report, each door tested meets or exceeds the code a required 15 Ibf maximum to release the latch (Door Motion However, three of the five doors tested do not meet the 30 maximum allowable force to set the door in motion {Door Motion 2) during the most extreme condition/multiple equipment failure egress scenario. This is a violation of NFPA 101 section 7.2.1.4.5, and the data is derived from door ?ooening force calculations based on the differentialpressures recorded during commissioning. Exception No. 1 of this section of the code states the following: ?The openingforce for existing doors in existing buildings shall not exceed a 50 (222 N) applied to the latch stile?. Per review and interpretation of the this exception does not apva in this case since the building was not considered an ?existing building? when it was built in 2005 per NFPA 101-1997. The maximum SO?lbf [222 N) operating requirement of earlier editions [pro-1988) ofthe Code remains applicable only to existing doors. he following corrective actions will be performed as soon as the program schedule can accommodate entry into this area for testing and adjustments: 1. Adjust the door closure force on affected doors to under 5 [bf and perform empirical test of doors under testing scenarios identi?ed in the attachment to determine actual compliance with applicable safety codes. Ensure that biological containment is maintained and that the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 2. if necessary, install new door closers that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to ensure that biological containment is maintained and to allow the doors to meet code. Perform empirical test of doors to ensure biological containment is maintained and that the actual performance of the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 3. if necessary, install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door and ensure these doors will meet biological containment parameters and be in compliance with Life Safety Code requirements I during the highly unlikely but certainly possible event of a multiple equipment failure egress scenario. Perform empirical tests to ensure actual performance meets Life Safety Code Requirements. Please note that BFO and OSHE will be conducting actual door tests and will either con?rm a violation or indicate that we are not in violation at all. At present we are taking a conservative approach since both sets of calculated data suggest a violation under extreme failure/egress conditions. JeffWilliams Deputy Director/AHJ oolocoo/aro From: Raymond, George (CDCJOCOOIBFD) Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:00 PM 12:93 ghan? Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) 262m- Subjec-t: Egress Issues George. A stated earlier today FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors in 2528i?? Vivarium. Paul sent an email to Jeff Williams on ?il20i2011 asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response, we (FMEO) viewed the letter of the code was applicable. The Commissioning report stated: ?the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is iSihf. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greaterthan three times that amount (45lb0. As Paul stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.23.9.1 it-states; ?Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure di?'erence across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklered buildings or .1 in water column in nonsprin klered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure di?erence under likely conditions of stock e?ect or wind. The pressure di??erence across doors shall exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by aforce of 30lbf in accordance with 12.1.4.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.1.4.5 it states; ?The forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed 15lbf to release the latch, 30lbf to set the door in motion, and 15lbf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure sh all not exceed Slbf. These forces shall be applied to the latch stile.? "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed SOlbf applied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 15 bf to engage the latch on the door, 30 bf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, in and existing building]. 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12/28/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation 5 C. Based on this our worst door is Bibs over code. We will perform extensive test in this are the second week in July 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception ofthe code, S?lbs, the doors are in compliance. in No action required 2. if the Existin exceptions does not apply we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply' fan did} if con dition - Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under Sibf II Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. 0 Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. (by the way he doesn?t reference the section of the code) then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; I On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. I Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. longestsash, <4 Meg-s-ager'FW': manum Egress <47 Message: warlum Egress an? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O??ice Centers for Disease Control and Prone-Mien 1600 Clifton Road. N.W., MS: 13-04 Atianta, GA 30333 Of?ce: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Ceii: 404.597.2599 57?; Pieale cam-ids:- as infer-e printing no e-nzaii ESE .. --EEGH ES use 3. -- J?lm FORCETESF States Fire alarm AHIJ ST AIRWELL FANS ISLBS BULBS 151.35 Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan Failure Safer,- Interlock} Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON 0 ON Geri aral Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF IN ON Pull stations Alarm ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUOES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LE $331 3.2 Us: ITest atria FORCE TESI States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST STAIRWELI. FANS 15LHS BULBS 15LBS Normal Normal ON OFF AHU dual Fan Failure IAHU Safety Interlockl Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble FF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm FF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL U5 -- IIest Matrix FORCE TEST States Fire alarm AHU ENHAUST ST A IRWELL FANS 151.35 SOLBS ISLBS Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan FailurejAHU Safety Interlock} Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trou hle OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Afarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHLI Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EKCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL $6.533? us . . IIest Matrix DOOR FORCE TEST States Fire alarm AHU Ell HA UST STAIRWELL FANS 15 LBS BULBS Normal No n'rlal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan Failure Safety interlock: Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON I General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUOES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. 2523*? FORCE TEST Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST STAIRWELI. FANS 151.85 31.11.35 Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan Failure Safety Interlock} Nomal OFF MIN OFF AH Duct detector Trouble OFF IN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Ala rm with AHU Shutdown Ala rm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUOES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. 262mb;- Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, July' 19, 2012 12:07 PM To; Ra}:r ??ieet: FWJ Egress Issues Proposed 7(24 Testing) George: Can you send the original Excel Spreadsheet used to make the soriptform, or is it available on shared drive? Thanks, Paul Probst 252mb: From: Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocoorOSHE) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:53 AM To: Jue, Bruce R. (CDCKOCOOI. E. Wigington, Darryl Walpole, 5 tocrocooxOSHE); Bowen, Ken L. (cocrocooraFO) - aymon Kenneth K. Cc: Garner, Ron eorge Powell, Steven L. Williams, ?ef?w (?Pranan 'u Bruce, Egress Issules Proposed 7724 Testing) Item 1. OK Item 2. Hold off testing stairwell pressurization until the 24th because of unknown consequences Item 3. Send out email for FA on the Item 4. Yes, we can reschedule. Item 5. 0K Item 6. Agree Item Tr'. Agree. I believe that each door should be tested at least 3 times for field veri?cation of reproducible results. William Howard Biosafet}.r OfficerfBiosafety Team Leader Of?ce of Safety, Health, and Environment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 404.639.2174 673.614.7257 NOTICE: This message aad any accompanying arc C?l?EfEd by the Eiccrraaic Communications Privacy Acr, I8 U.S.C. 251' 8- 2521? and contains Sensitive Bar Uraciassi?cd?S?R iaformariarr tire specified imiiviriaaifs) ofrirc US Department Of Hcai?r And Human Scnriccs -for which disclosure, misuse, airerariorr or ricsrracr?iarr caairi arivcrseiy affect National Security or 1 government interests. ifyon are not tire intended recipient or an agent responsibiefar delivering it to tire intended recipient, yon are iiereiry tl?imed have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking ofany action based on tire contents information is strictiy proitibiieti. ifyon nave received titis communication in error, piease notify as imnieciieteiv by E-niaii, and deiete tire originai message. Dissemination oftitis message emir?ar its contents to tire gene-ref pnbiic or media is not authorized. inverse 252aihi 252adu I I From: Joe, Bruca R. (CDCJUCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:09 AM To: Probst Paul E. Wigington, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. (cociocooiosnei; Howard, William (Bill) (cocrocooiosna; Bowen, Ken L. (coo/ocooiaro) Cc: Garner, Ron Raymond, George Powell, Steven L. Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOO BFO meat: All Egress Issues Proposed 2,!24 Testing) See below and provide feedback to the highlighted: 1. have coordinated corrective action (installing new panel hardware, changing out field modules, and new hardware programming} for the? FACP for this Saturday 7/21 No CDC announcement has been sent yet. end we want to test with a ?re alarm to verify that stair_p_r_essurization starts as originally designed. otate'cwmd weirdest entail?sectar?(memories? sending out one standard generic (20C announcement for FA testing that includes 7/21 (8:00am- 2:00pm) and N24 paes?g?a?e concur}: if so, I'll send it out today. Darryl has yet to receive our order for additiongligew door pressure scales. if they do not arrive before 7/24, we can always delayireschedule this testing. [Though-tag From the attached matrix, we agreed to test #2 and #5 for the 5 doors listed plus an additional 3 doors. easel. get massagi- nlisleasa add gasping.- iora'g?ejaagg, you was, sense an ydui Spreadsheet sioss we neither-9 the. ME: To recap our meeting from Tuesday concerning testing, Ken and I will initiate wf the help of the FA, stair pressurization, and ell-Al?UhseTguencespDarryl and Ken will test doors; an and Bill will observe and record data. Concerning any doors that do not pass, if the failure is by 1-5 lbs. {for example: a reading of up to 35 bs force), the (Jeff) has verbally agreed to granting a temporary variance until corrective actions can be taken. I will have to send him an official CDC AHJ variance request that morning. [fa door falls by more than 5 lbs., immediate corrective action will be needed by adding powered door assistance, installed by FSE work order. margarine;listless BFUCE From: Raymond, George Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 5:23 PM To: Jue, Bruc Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Egress Issues FYI From: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 04:56 PM To: Chandler, George Browning, Daniel A. Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Henderson, Joseph Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. (CDUOCUDXBFO) -- Egress Issues lbl 23li42 2523'?? Door test script 7-1 -12.pdf>> All, I have reviewed the information provided beiow and sustain the existing ?nding that the doors referenced below are not in compliance with NFPA 101 Life Safety Code section 7.2.1.4.5 under extreme egress scenario based on calculations performed from pressure differentials recorded during commissioning. The commissioning report dated March 2010 does stated; r?Upon dual supply shut down, egress from the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by The Commissioning Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The difjferentiai pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of- the allowable force per code. Al'so, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded the card reader; it was necessary to push/pull the door inward/outward before turning the handle and opening the door. The commissioning report does not acknowledge the code-recognized steps required to open the door and the code required maximum allowable force for each step. The 15 list maximum that is referenced in the commissioning report should only be applied to the maximum force required to release (open) the latch (Door Motion not the force required to open the door from a closed position. The code requires a maximum allowable force of 30 to set the door in motion from a sealed position to an open position (Door Motion 2), and 15 Ibfto open the door to the minimum required width (Door Motion 3). Per the calculations provided in the commissioning report, each door tested meets or exceeds the code required 15 maximum to release the latch (Door Motion However, three ofthe ?ve doors tested do not meet the 30 maximum allowable force to set the door in motion (Door Motion 2] during the most extreme conditionfmultiple equipment failure egress scenario. This is a violation of NFPA 101 section and the data is derived from door ?apenine force calculations based on the differential pressures recorded during commissioning. Exception No. 1 of this section of the code states the following: "The openingforcefor existing doors in existing buildings shall not exceed a 50 {222 N) applied to the latch stile?. Per review and interpretation of the this exception does not apva in this case since the building was not considered an ?existing building"when it was built in 2005 per NFPA 101?1992. The maximum (222 operating requirement of earlier editions [Fire-1988) of the Code remains applicable only' to existing doors. The following corrective actions will be performed as soon as the program schedule can accommodate entry into this area for testing and adjustments: 1. Adjust the door closure force on affected doors to under 5 [bf and perform empirical test of doors under testing scenarios identified in the attachment to determine actual compliance with applicable safety codes. Ensure that biological containment is maintained and that the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 2. If necessary!r install new door closers that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to ensure that biological containment is maintained and to allow the doors to meet code. Perform empirical test of doors to ensure biological containment is maintained and that the actual performance of the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 3. If necessary, install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door and ensure these doors will meet biological containment parameters and be in compliance with Life Safetv Code requirements duringI the highly unliker but certainly possible event of a multiple equipment failure egress scenario. Perform empirical tests to ensure actual performance meets Life Safety Code Requirements. Please note that BFD and OSHE will be conducting actual door tests and will either con?rm a violation or indicate that we are not in violation at all. At present we are taking a conservative approach since both sets of calculated data suggest a violation under extreme failurejegress conditions. Jeff Williams Deputy Director ,l AHJ 770.488.8089 From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:00 PM mlquo: Chan Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. (CDCJOCOOXBFO) slam? Eulbjectt- Egress Issues George, . l'if' A stated earlier today FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors in - ivariurn. Paul sent an email to Jeff Williams on 1l20i2011-asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response. we (FMEO) viewed the letter of the code was applicable. The Commissioning report stated: ?the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency iO?i Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45lb0. As stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.23.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure dbfference across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklers-d buildings or .1 in water column in nonsprinirlered buildings, and shall be capable of main taining the pressure dr?erence under likely conditions of stock effect or Wind. The pressure a'i?ererice across doors sh all exceed that which allows the door to begin to open a force of 30lbf in accordance with 7.2.14.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 72.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed 151bf to release the latch, 30ibf to set the door in motion, and Ella)? to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the in terior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Slbj?. These forces shall be applied to the latch stile.? ?Exception No. I: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed E?lbf applied to the latch stile Translations, it takes lSIbf to engage the latch on the door, pounds to break the seal and set the door In motion, (50lbf in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12(28/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation SE. 2523412 Based on this our worst door is 8le over code. We will perform extensive test in this are the second week in July 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception ofthe code, the doors are in compliance. No action required 2. lithe Existir we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan #511?recondit-ion I Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under - Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. 0 Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation ofthe code is correct. (by the way he doesn?t reference the section of the code} then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; II On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. 5 - Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. 0 Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. manuscm . . 252m..- .essage: Vlvarlum Egress Message: FW: warrum Egress George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O??ice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: Atlanta, GA 39333 Office: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.539.1635 Cell: 404.591.2599 :5 Piease eenn'der roe en eiionmeei be?iepriaiing flair e?inaii Mathe, Chester From: Howard, William (Bill) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:53 AM To: Jue, Bruce R. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO *Wiinton, Danyl Walpole, Kenneth K. - Bowen, Ken L. Co: Garner, Ron Raymond. George Powell, Steven L. W, I I SF: Williams, Jeffer steam?Subject: . - Egress Issues Proposed 7i24 Testing) Bruce, Item 1. OK Item 2. Hold off testing stairwell pressurization until the 24th because of unknown consequences Item 3. Send out e?maii for FA on the Item 4. Yes, we can reschedule. Item 5. OK Item 6. Agree Item 7. Agree. I believe that each door should be tested at least 3 times for ?eld veri?cation of reproducible results. William Howard Biosafety OfficeriBiosafety Team Leader Of?ce of Safety, Health, and EHYimnment (OSHE) Centers for Disease: Control and Prevention 404.639.2174 678.614.7257 NOTICE: This message and any accompanying documents are coverenl by the Etectronie Comatanieations Privacy Act, i ii UZS.C. 251 0- 352?? and contains Sensitive Unciassh?ied??w itt?trntation intentietifor the Specified imtivitinaiifs) of the US Department Of Hcaitit Ana? thnan Sen-ices ?for which diseiosn re, ntisnse, aiteration or desirttcii?? eoniti advenseiy a?ect National Securiti- or government interests. ifyalt are not the intended recipient or an agent respansihie for activating it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking afany action based on the contents of this information is strietiv prohibited Hyatt have received this eanntnuzieatian in error, piease noth as by Email, and tieiete the originai message. Dissemination of this message and/or its contents to the general public or media is not authorized. From: Jue, Bruce R. Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:09 AM ?3342 .. Wigington, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. Howard, William (Bill) Bowen, Ken L. (CDQOCOUIBFO) Cc: Garner, Ron Raymond, George Powell, Steven L. Williams, 1 262mb; Jeffery BFO Egress Issues Proposed 2/24 Testing) See below and provide feedback to the highlighted: 1. have coordinated corrective action (installing new panel hardware, changing out field modules, and new hardware progra mming} for the FACP for this Saturday No CDC announcement has been sent yet. 2. At the end we want to test with a fire alarmto?verify that stair pressurization starts as originally designed. SifterJermain. er (7!sz teeming? 3. I suggest sending out one standard ge_n__erlic for FA testing that includes 7721 l8:iJDam-_ 2:00pm) and 7f24 If so, I?ll send it out today. 4. Darryl has yet to receive our order for additionalfnew door pressure scales. they do not arrive before 7f24, we can always delay/reschedule this testing. It 5. From the attached matrix, we agreed to test #2 and #5 for the 5 doors listedplus an additional 3 doors. Paul; [Cari a use thes?BFdr7nu'MBers and add?theite rev to. targets Peel tear Spreadsheet since. we only, haircuts-PW! E. To recap our meeting from Tuesday concerning testing, Ken and I will initiate w/ the help of the FA, stair pressurization, and AHU_sequences; Darryl and Ken will test doors; and and Bill will observe and record data- Commantv??tb?llastsef 2. Concerning any doors that do not pass, ifthe failure is by 1-5 lbs. (for example: a reading of up to 35lbs force}, the AHJ (Jeff) has verbally agreed to granting a temporary variance until corrective actions can be taken. I will have to send him an official CDC AHJ variance request that morning. If a door fails by more than 5 lbs., immediate corrective action will be needed by adding powered door assistance, installed by FSE work order. fc?omgtuf?fo?fqicau stages BFUCE From: Raymond, George Sent: Monday, July [12, 2012 5:23 PM To: Jue, Bruce R. Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. Subject: Fw: .- FYI Ibh3142 262mb} IlJllEiialE 262mb; From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Monday, July [12, 2012 04:56 PM To: Chandler, George Browning, Daniel A. Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Henderson Jose Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIDCOOJBFO) Egress Issues 3 Door test script All, I have reviewed the information provided below and sustain the existing finding that the doors referenced below are not in compliance with NFPA 101 Life Safety Code section 7.2.1.4.5 under extreme egress scenario based on calculations performed from pressure differentials recorded during commissioning. The commissioning report dated March 2010 does stated:, "Upon dual supply shut down, egress from the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by The Commissioning {Cx} Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the "Nation al Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum ollowabie force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The drfferentiai pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to push/pull the door inward/outward before turning the handle and opening the door.? The commissioning report does not acknowledge the code-recognized steps required to open the door and the code required maximum allowable force for each step. The 15 maximum that is referenced in the commissioning report should only be applied to the maximum force required to release (open) the latch (Door Motion not the force required to open the door from a closed position. The code requires a maximum allowable force of 30 to set the door in motion from a sealed position to an open position (Door Motion and 15 to open the door to the minimum required width (Door Motion Per the calculations provided in the commissioning report, each door tested meets or exceeds the code required 15 maximum to release the latch (Door Motion However, three of the five doors tested do not meet the 30 maximum allowable force to set the door in motion (Door Motion 2] during the most extreme conditionfmultiple equipment failure egress scenario. This is a violation of NFPA 101 section 12.1.4.5, and the data is derived from door ?opening force calculations based on the differential pressures recorded during commissioning. Exception No. 1 of this section of the code states the following: "The openingforcefor existing doors in existing buiidings shall not exceed a 50 {222 N) applied to the latch stile?. Per review and interpretation of the AHJ, this exception does not apply in this case since the building was not considered an rexisting building? when it was built in 2005 per NFPA 101-1997. The maximum (222 operating requirement of earlier editions (pm?1983) of the Code remains applicable only to existing doors. The following corrective actions will be performed as soon as the program schedule can accommodate entry into this area for testing and adjustments: 1. Adjust the door closure force an affected doors to under 5 and perform empirical test of doors under testing scenarios identified in the attachment to determine actual compliance with applicable safety codes. Ensure that biological containment is maintained and that the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 2. if necessary, install new door closers that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to ensure that biological containment is maintained and to allow the doors to meet code. Perform empirical test ofdoors to ensure biological containment is maintained and that the actual performance of the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 3. If necessary, install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door and ensure these doors will meet biological containment parameters and be in compliance with Life Safety Code requirements during the highly uniikely but certainly possible event of a multiple equipment failure egress scenario. Perform empirical tests to ensure actual performance meets Life Safety Code Requirements. Please note that BFO and OSHE will be conducting actual door tests and will either con?rm a violation or indicate that we are not in violation at all. At present we are taking a conservative approach since both sets of calculated data suggest a violation under extreme failurefegress conditions. 3 Jeff Williams Deputy Director ODIOCOOXBFO 770.488.8089 From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:00 PM To: Chandler, George Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Egress Issues 262mm George, was 42 A stated earlier today FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors in l:lVivarium. Paul seamen email to Jeff Williams on 1i20i2011 asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response, we (FMEO) viewed the letter of the code was applicable. The Commissioning report stated: ?the force required to open doors during suppiy fan failure does not meet the Na iionai Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum aiiowabie force per this code in a means of egress is i?ihi. The differentiai pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45ibt).? As Paul stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.23.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof enciosures using stair pressurization shaii use and approved engineered system with a design pressure di?erence across the barrier of not iess than .05 in water coiumn in sprinkiered buiidings or .1 in water coiumn in nonsprinkiered buiidings, and sh he capabie of maintaining the pressure difference under iikeiy conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure difference across doors shoii exceed that which aiiows the door to begin to open by a force of 30ibf in accordance with 7.24.4.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 11.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fatty open any door manuoiiy in a means of egress shat! not exceed 15th to reiease the iotch, 30ibf to set the door in motion, and lSibf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without ciosure sh not exceed Sibf. These forces shoii he oppiied to the iatch stiie. "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing buiiding shoii not exceed 50ibf appiied to the iotch stiie? Translations, it takes 15lbf to engage the latch on the door, pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, in and existing building], 15 pounds to fullyr open the door. WEEK-242 US 2o2th; Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 132819010 and using a door closure forcecalculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation 41: US I: 532523?? Based on this our worst door is Bibs over code. We will perform extensive test in this are the second week in uly 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, Sles, the doors are in compliance. I No action required 2. if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may causean issues in a supply fan failure condition; rm"? *2 52523? - Adjust the door closure force on these .doors to under - install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to' an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. 0 install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. lfwe are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. (hi;F the way he doesn?t reference the section of the code} then to mitigate the problem we have the following options;- I On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. I Install VFD's that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. - install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. IbilE?-l? US C1 i: Vivarium -- Egress . .2?2sim Vivarium. Egress cc: Message: FW: George K. Raymond Deputy Director- Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O?ce Cenfersfor Disease Central and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, NW), MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 O??ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 4045912599 5% remia?er Elbe ive?zirepi?ierieg ewe e-meii Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: .Jue, Bruce R. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Thursday, July ?19, 2012 9:09 AM - To: Probst, Paul E. _ngton, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. {bits-?42 Howard, William (Bill) Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) cc: Garner, Ron (CDCIOCOOIBFOE Raymond, George Powell, Steven Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) est: .. Egress issues Proposed 7124 Testing) ass-agents hments: .. - Door test script T-1-12.pdf All See below and provide feedback to the highlighted: 1. i have coordinated corrective action (installing new panel hardware, changing out field modules, and new hardware programming] for the FACP for this Saturday 7X21 No CDC announcement has been sent yet. 2. At the end we want todtest with a"?rehlalarmntoverify thatstairupressu?rization starts as originally designed. Bill. 'Is this. 12ml 3. i suggest sending out one standard generic CDC annogncement for FA testing that includes 7/21l8:00am- 2:00pm) and 7/24 if so, I?ll send it out today. 4. Darryl has yet to receive our order for additional?new door pressure scales. If they do not arrive before 7/24, we can always delay/ reschedule this testing. I 5. from the attached matdx, we agreed to test #2 and #5 for theu?mdoors listed plus an additional 3 carat-James dame at ease irewarciiww 6. To recap our meeting from Tuesday concerning testing, Ken and I will initiate {wf the help of the FA, stair pressurization, andAIfii} seguenvcesiugarryl and Ken will test doors; an and Bill will observe and record data- nts?Do we. distillssis'si 2. Concerning any doors that do not pass, if the failure is by 1-5 lbs. (for example: a reading of up to 35Ibs force), the AHJ (Jeff) has verbally agreed to granting a temporary variance until corrective actions can be taken. I will have to send him an official CDC AHJ variance request that morning. If a door fails by more than 5 lbs., immediate corrective action will be needed by adding powered door assistance, installed by FSE work order. 359mmsn'sin'jqieasosage BFUCE From: Raymond, George Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 5:23 PM To: Jue, Bruce R. CD Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. ?i??fsi??eot:. Fw: Egress Issues FYI From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 04:56 PM To: Chandler, George Browning, Daniel A. Meechan, Paul J. Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. Jade-RE:- - Egress Issues US zszam- a: . - Door test script All, have reviewed the information provided below and sustain the existing finding that the doors referenced below are not in compliance with NFPA 101 Life Safethr Code section 7.2.1.45 Under extreme egress scenario based on calculations performed from pressure differentials recorded during commissioning. The commissioning report dated March 2010 does stated; "Upon dual supply shut down, egress from the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by CD The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure do es not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also. on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to push/pull the door inward/outward before turning the handle and opening the door. The commissioning report does not acknowledge the code-recognized steps required to open the door and the code required maximum allowable force for each step. The 15 maximum that is referenced in the commissioning report should onlv be applied to the maximum force required to release (open) the latch {Door Motion not the force required to open the door from a closed position. The code requires a maximum allowable force of30 to set the door in motion from a sealed position to an open position [Door Motion 2), and 15 to open the door to the minimum required width (Door Motion 3). Per the calculations provided in the commissioning report, each door tested meets or exceeds the code required 15 maximum to release the latch (Door Motion 1). However, three ofthe five doors tested do not meet the 30 maximum allowable force to set the door in motion (Door Motion 2) during the most extreme condition/multiple equipment failure egress scenario. This is a violation of NFPA 101 section 12.1.4.5. and the data is derived from door -ooenine: force calcolations based on the differential pressures recorded during commissioning. Exception No. 1 of this section of the code states the following: "The opening forcefor existing doors in existing buildings shall not exceed a 50 (222 N) applied to the latch stile?. Per review and interpretation ofthe this exception does not apply in this case since the building was not considered an ?existing building? when it was built in 2005 per NFPA 101-1991 The maximum SU-lbf (222 N) operating requirement of earlier editions (ore-1988) ofthe Code remains applicable only to existing doors. The following corrective actions will be performed as soon as the program schedule can accommodate entrv into this area for testing and adjustments: 1. Adjust the door closure force on affected doors to under 5 [bf and perform empirical test of doors under testing scenarios identified in the attachment to determine actual compliance with applicable safety codes. Ensure that biological containment is maintained and that the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 2. If necessary, install new door closers that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to ensure that biological containment is maintained and to allow the doors to meet code. Perform empirical test of doors to ensure biological containment is maintained and that the actual performance of the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 3. If necessary, instail a door assist mechanism__to mechanically assist in opening the door and ensure these doors will meet hioiogical containment parameters and be in compliance with Life Safety Code requirements during the highly unliker but certainly possible event of a multiple equipment failure egress scenario. Perform empirical tests to ensure actual performance meets Life Safety Code Requirements. Please note that BFO and OSHE will be conducting actual door tests and will either con?rm a violation or indicate that we are not in violation at all. At present we are taking a conservative approach since both sets of calculated data suggest a violation under extreme failurelegress conditions. Jeff Williams Deputy Director 2? AHJ ?70.488.3089 From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:00 PM To: Chandler Geor Wll?ams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Etf?izi'ff Striated: Eg ress Is sues George, A stated earlier today FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors in Sivarium. email to Jett Williams on 1i20i2011 asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response, we (FMEO) viewed the letter of the code was applicable. The Commissioning report stated: ?the force required to open doors during supply fan taiture does not meet the National' Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is t?ibf. The ditterentiai pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45150.? As Paul stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.23.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof enctosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure dif?erence across the barrier of not iess than .05 in water column in sprinktered buitdin gs or .1 in water column in nonsprinidered huitdin gs, and shahl be capable of maintaining the pressure dijj?erence under iikei conditions of stock e?ect or wind. The pressure difference across doors shaft exceed that which ailaws the door to begin to open by a force of 3Utbf in accordance with 7.2.14.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safetyr Code Section 7.2.1.4.5 it states; he forces required to fatty open any door manuaiiy in a means of egress shat! not exceed 15ihf to release the latch, 30ihf to set the door in motion, and 15ibf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without ciosure shoii not exceed Sibf. These forces shoii be oppiied to the latch stiie. "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing buiidin shoii not exceed 50ibf oppiied to the iotch stiie? Translations, it takes 15lbfto engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, (50lbf in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12f28i2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation it: 41242 5.6. 252nm!- Based on this our worst door is Bibs over code. We will perform extensive test in this are the second week in July 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, Sles, the doors are in compliance. I No action required 2. lfthe Existing excegtions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan . . . I'h failure condition; a I Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under I install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. I Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supva fan failure condition. 3. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. (by the way he doesn't reference the section of the code) then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; I On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. I Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. 4 I Install a deer assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. US Ci in: i 99"" ?as Message: Vlvarlum Egress Message: FW: ?gs, Vivarium Egress George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O??ice Centers for Disease sztmi and Prevention 16 00 Ciiftan Road, N.W., MS: 13-04 Atlanta; GA 30333 O?icc: 4046393335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cali: 404.597.2599 Heme media?s? 2?09 this swag? EG use a 252 ITest Matrix DOOR FORCE TEST States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST STAIRWELI. FANS 15L BS BULBS 15LBS Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan Failure Safer.r Interlock] Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUOES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN Ll Irma ti; at: a nest Matrix roece TEST States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST STAIRWELL FANS ISLBS BULBS 15LBS Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan Failure Sal?etvlI Interlock] Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Ouct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF GirieralFire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AH LI Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Full stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EKCLU DES THE SMOKE CONTROL FAN EL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. We? Matrix noon FORCE TEST States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST ST FANS ISLEIS SOLBS 15LES Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan Failure Safety Interlock} Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trou hie OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON Gen eral Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OF MIN ON Fu ll stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANELDN THE MAIN LEVEL. est Matrix DOOR FORCE TEST Slates Fire alarm AHU EKHAUST STAIRWELL FANS 15LBS SOLES Normal Normal ON ON OFF AH LJ dual Fan Failure Salety Interlock} Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUOES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. mile-:42 LLS . ?252a'hf Test Matrix Donn FORCE T551- States Fire alarm EXHAUST ST AIRW ELL FANS 15LEIS ROLES ISLBS Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan Failure Salemr Interlock} Normal OFF MIN OFF AH Duct detector Trouble FF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Joe, Bruce R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 8:54 AM To: Probst. Paul E. Subject: FW: LCN Auto Door Openers Attachments: LCN 4842 Instruction Bookletpdf; LCN4630.pdf; LCN4840.pdf; LCN FYI From: Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 8:38 AM To: Jue, Bruce R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: LCN Auto Door Openers Chad Jackson Johnson Controls, Inc. 1350 North Meadow Pkwy Suite 100 Roswell Ga 30076 Cell: CDC Field Of?ce 1800 Clifton Rd BIng4-10109 Atlanta [53.30333 Field Office: 4046392368 Mathe, Chester From: Raymond, George Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 5:23 PM To: Jue, Bruce R. Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. I I ect' -- Egress Issues 2mm; C. oor test script 7-1-12.pdf FYI From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 04:55 PM To: Chandler, George Browning, Daniel A. Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Henderson Jose Raymond, George Bowen, Ken $5321 RE: ?iEgress Issues Door test script All, i have reviewed the information provided below and sustain the existing finding that the doors referenced below are not in compliance with NFPA 101 Life Safety Code section 7.2.1.4.5 under extreme egress scenario based on calculations performed from pressure differentials recorded during commissioning. The commissioning report dated March 2010 does stated:, r"Upon duo! suppiyshut down, egressfrom the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by The Commissioning (Ex) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the "Nation ai Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 Lh?e Safety Handbook. The maximum aiiowabie force per this code in a means of egress is 15 ibs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the reiease of the eiectronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to push/pull the door inward/outward before turning the handle and opening the door. The commissioning report does not acknowledge the code-recognized steps required to open the door and the code required maximum allowable force for each step. The 15 Ibf maximum that is referenced in the commissioning report should only be applied to the maximum force required to release (open) the latch {Door Motion not the force required to open the door from a closed position. The code requires a maximum allowable force of30 to set the door in motion from a sealed position to an open position {Door Motion 2), and 15 [bf to open the door to the minimum required width (Door Motion 3). Per the calculations provided in the commissioning report, each door tested meets or exceeds the code required 15 maximum to release the latch (Door Motion 1). However, three ofthe five doors tested do not meet the 30 Ibf maximum allowable force to set the door in motion [Door Motion 2} during the most extreme condition/multiple equipment failure egress scenario. This is a violation of NFPA 101 section 7.2.1.45, and the data is derived from door -opening force calculations based on the differential pressures recorded during commissioning. Exception No. 1 of this section of the code states the following: ?The opening force for existing doors in existing buildings shall not exceed a 50 ibf (222 applied to the latch stile?. Per review and interpretation ofthe this exception does not apply in this case since the building was not considered an 1 262au-r 'existing building? iwrhen it was built in 2005 per NFPA 101-1997. The maximum (222 N) operating requirement of earlier editions (me-1988) ofthe Code remains applicable only to existing doors. The following corrective actions will be performed as soon as the program schedule can accommodate entry into this area for testing and adjustments: 1. Adjust the door closure force on affected doors to under 5 Ibf and perform empirical test of doors under testing scenarios identified in the attachment to determine actual compliance with applicable safety codes. Ensure that biological containment is maintained and that the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 2. If necessary, install new door closers that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to ensure that biological containment is maintained and to allow the doors to meet code. Perform empirical test of doors to ensure biological containment is maintained and that the actual performance of the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 3. If necessary, install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door and ensure these doors will meet biological containment parameters and be in compliance with Life Safety Code requirements during the highly unlikely but certainly possible event of a multiple equipment failure egress scenario. Perform empirical tests to ensure actual performance meets Life Safety Code Requirements. Please note that BFO and OSHE will be conducting actual door tests and will either con?rm a violation or indicate that we are not in violation at all. At present we are taking a conservative approach since both sets of calculated data suggest a violation under extreme failure/egress conditions. Jeff Williams Deputy Director I AHJ ODKOCDOXBFO ?70.488.3089 From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOZBFD) Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:00 PM Immg'lifp?ghan?. Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. _Egress Issues George, A stated earlier today FMED did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors in ire-hum. i email to Jeff Williams on 1i20i2011 asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response, we (FMEO) viewed the letter of the code was applicable. The Commissioning report stated: ?the force required to open doors during suppiy fan failure does not meet the Nations! Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum aiiowahie force per this code in a means of egress is i5lhf. The differentiai pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45lh?.? 2 As Paul stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.3.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure difference across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklered buildings or .1 in water column in nonsprinklered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure di??erence under likely conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure di??erence across doors sh all exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by a force of 30lbf in accordance with 7.2.14.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.1.4.5 it states; he forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed 15lbf to release the latch, 30lbf to set the door in motion, and 15lhf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side?hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Slbf. Th ese forces sh all be applied to the latch stile.? "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed 50lbf applied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 15lbf to engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, (SOIbfin and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12/28/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: ?nd-Lu- nnlA-aln-I-L?uu Allyn-All- Ann?n?ri?n IbllSI ll: US '3 5 252301 Based on this our worst door is 8th over code. We will perform extensive test in this are the second week in July 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception ofthe code, 50lbs, the doors are in compliance. I- No action required 2. if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan Emaililfasiliire condition; I Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under - Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. 0 Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. (by the way he doesn?t reference the section ofthe code) then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; a On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. I Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. - Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. I . {$42 Vwarlum Egress so rr?i George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O?ice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, MS: F414 Atlanta, GA 30333 O?ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 5?5- Pi?eare as wider entertainment bej?arepn'nting res e?rnaii Maths, From: Sent: To: Do: Subject George Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Friday, June 29, 2012 3:16 PM Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Bowen, Ken L. (cocrocooram); Williams, Jeffery Wigington, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. (co rocoora Jue, Bruce R. (cosiocooraFol II 3:24" USE. . RE: (Elam? Egress testing. a Team: This is just the level of detail i need at this point. Thanks and have a great weekend! G.- From: Raymond, George (CDCJOCUUIBFO) Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 3:13 PM To: Cha ndler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Wigington, Darryl Walpole, Kenneth K. CDC Probst, Paul E. Jue, Bruce R. $533?? Eij?biect: gress testing. George, Below and attached is the egress test that FMEO ls pianning in July for Vivarium. A more formal schedule and test scri will follow. The attached spread sheet is a sample of the test matrix that will be run for each door. The door included in the spread sheet are the doors reference in the commissioner?s report. This list is not complete. We will be meeting with OSHE to clearly de?ne egress doors in the area. FMEO US Cl. ZBEalh closu re. force. on as developed the following test scenarios to confirm the following; Current operating condition under system failure and fire alarms in the build. Total door opening force under system failure and fire alarm in the building to 5th and test during supply fan failure and alarm conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Du General ct detector Fire alarm building Fire alarm Supply fan failure Stairwell pressure fans (Everything but a pull station starts the fans) Freeze protections. Fire alarm system Scenario Verify Fi ?<35 file: re alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by the ?re alarm system. HESS George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Main rename and Engineering O?ce {fentersfor Disease Control and Prevention 1606 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: 304 Atlanta, GA 30333 Oj?ice: 404.63 9.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.5 9? .2599 51?, News mmz'rier the wwimm?m? Eag?rre priming tbix ermai! 262aw? IUHE d2 . 252m,- Mathe. Chester (GDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCODIBFD) Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 3:13 PM To; Chandler, George (CDCJOCOOIBFCJ) Co: Bowen, Ken L. Williams. Jeffery Wigington, Darryl Walpole. Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Jue, Bruce R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Biibimztg. hEgress testing. George, Below and attached is the egress test that FMED is planning in July for r26gal-hi: a Vivarium. A more formal schedule and test scripts will follow. The attached spread sheet'is a sample of the test matrix that will be run for each door. The door included in the spread sheet are the doors reference in the commissioner's report. This list is not complete. We will be meeting with OSHE to clearly de?ne egress doors in the area. FM EU has developed the following test scenarios to con?rm the following; a Current operating condition under system failure and fire alarms in the build. a Total .door opening force under system failure and ?re alarm in the building USP: closureforce-o - -- - to Elbf and test during supply fan failure and alarm conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm General building Fire alarm Supply fan failure I Stairwell pressure fans [Everything but a pull station starts the fans) Freeze protections. Fire alarm ?stem Scenario Verify'Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by the ?realarm system. EGRESS Ll George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O?ice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: 13?04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Ceii: 4045922599 I 55 Please wander t?e eneirenneene befei?e printing their e-ereafif 1 .EGRESS US 0 262mm Test Matrix FORCE TEST States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST STAIHWELI. FANS 15LBS BULBS 15LBS Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fa Failure lnterlo tic} Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN Ll. us 0 2mm; - aw DOOR FORCE TEST States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST STAIRWELI. FANS BULBS ISLBS Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan Failure Saietv Interlock} Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Nate: THIS TEST DES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. use 2523'?: - - iTest Matrix States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST STAIRWELL FANS ISLBS 15LES Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan Failure Salem.f Interlock) Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLU OES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVELTest Mat tit: 9'30? ?35 TEST States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST SFAIRWELL FANS 15LBS SOL BS 15LBS Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan Failure Safety Interlock} Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLU DES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL mum-42 US Cl zoaam: DOOR FORCETEST Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST STAIRWELL FANS ISLBS 301.53 ISLBS Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan Failure Safety Interlock] Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON UN General Fire Alarm with AH Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Joe, Bruoe R. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday. June 21, 2012 9:34 AM To: Raymond, George Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Co: Bel?ower. Craig Garner, Ron (CDCJOCOOIBFOJ: F'rohst. Paul E. mmqu 3 (C Bowen. Ken L. Powell. Steven L. (CDCJOCOOIBFOJ Main?Subject: -- RE: Vivarium Egress Ken INKS: 112 EBEaihi Ihi[3: 41' EBEaih? I noticed your out of office message and I?m on leave Monday. Let?s work together on this Tuesday (6/26) morning after the staff meeting. The actual test needs to occur any evening or weekend after July 9. We are in the middle of ordering and replacing FACP hardware. Broce From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 2:48 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Jue, Bruce R. Co: Beiflower, Craig Garner, Ron Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. S?bject: iyarium .Egress Ken! Bruce, We need to develop test scripts and a schedule for performing the below mentioned test. Please coordinate together and get with Craig and Ron to identify any ET resources you need. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineer-mg O??ice Carters for Disease Control and Preoentior: 1600 Clinton Rood, N.W., MS: Atlanta, (323130333 Of?ce: 404.639.3335 Fax: 494.639.1635 Cell: 404.591.2599 545 Please Ibe eew'remeem? bg?bre prserr'eg eel- e?emz'! From: Raymond, George Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:54 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Jue, Bruce R. Koob, Stephen H. Walpole, Kenneth K. Bel?ower, Craig Wigington, Darryl Cc: Chandler, Geor Went: FW: iyarium Egress This is FMEO response to BFU 0D and OSHE to address the OSHA complaint of violation of the NFPA 101 Life safety code and a testing scenario for the Vivarium area HVAC system, ?re alarm system and door opening force under AHU supply fan failure. Paul Probst's email below dated 1i20i2011 references the commissioning report dated 12i28i2010. In that report it stated; ?the force required to open doors during suppty fan taiiure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum aliowahie force per this code in a means of egress is 15lbt. The differentiai pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lb?. As Paul stated in his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 72.3.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof enciosures using stair pressurization shail use and approved engineered system with a design pressure dhj?erence across the barrier of not iess than .05 in water coiumn in sprinidered buildings or .1 in water coiumn in nonsprinkiered huiidings, and shoii he capahie of main taining the pressure di?erence under l'iireiy conditions ofstack effect or wind. The pressure di??erence across doors shaii exceed that which ail'ows the door to begin to open by a force of30ihf in accordance with 7.2.14.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fatty open any door monuaiiy in a means of egress shaii not exceed 15 ihf to reieose the iatch, 30in to set the door in motion, and 15ihf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without ciosure sh not exceed 5 These forces shaii he appiied to the iatch stiie.? "Exception No. 1: the opening force-for existing doors in existing buiiding shaii not exceed S?ihf appiieo? to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 15lbf to engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, (50lbf in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12f28f2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supva fan failure operation Measured danish-12 UEJZL. :3 252341: [bid-3:. l2 LIE 0 262.?? I SE. ?2E2a[n:- 5.20EWllA?dol 2(W-d) F=ch+ totoi door-opening force, in; Far: force to overcome door cioser, it); W: door area, It A door oreo, ft?j' dp pressure di??erence across door, in. of water a" distance from doorknob to edge of knob side of door, ft Under these measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. However, if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may 'Di'gm I. If we adjust the door closure force on 2ezam= a__.suppl.v. these doors to under 51hr. these door will he in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. Door caic Iation under suoolv fan failure operation sc. 25am..- n:rsj_42 use -62alh: FMEO has developed the following test scenarios to con?rm the following; - Current operating condition under system failure and ?re alarms in the build. Total door opening force under system failure and fire alarm in the building Sign? @195! deerclosure force to and test during supply fan failure and alarm conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm General building Fire alarm Supply fan failure Stairwell pressure fans (Everything but a pull station starts the fans] Freeze protections. Fire alarm svstem Scenario Verify Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents 1 Determine which HVAC units are affected by the fire alarm system. Test Matrix Fire STAIRWELL DOORS States alarm AHU EXHAUST FANS OK Normal Normal ON ON OFF YES AHU dual Fan Failure (AHU Safety Interlock] Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THE MAIN LEVEL. THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON Doors that will be tested are listed as follows; OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap] These doors were identi?ed during the original construction as egress doors and were tested to meet NFPA 101 and ADA req uirement. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Enginee?ng O??ice enters for Disease Con not and Preoeition 1500 Ciifton Rood, N.W., MS: F-O4 Atianto, GA 30333 Of?ce: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Catt: 404.597.2590 a Please consider fire ariw?roiwmit by?bze pic's-mtg as lei-wot? From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM ,2 J95 ?aymond "e rge Vivarium Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM mm, 93531451 lia t-Z?l??IEr?r (CDCIOCOOIBFO) mam" JEElii" Vivarium Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent?s report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lbf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 4 7.2.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 Ibf. Since the project modi?ed air ?ow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in comptiance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1- Ex Report 2. NFPA 101 2000 3. ASHRAE Formula 14 ?cos - - Cx File: NFPA 101 200nm? Filo: ashrae I formulapdf For ease of reference, this is what the Cx report states: "The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader, it was necessary to pushipull the door inwardioutward before turning the handle and opening the door.? Mathe, Chester From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 7:48 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Jue, Bruce R. Co: Beltlower, Craig Garner, Ron Probst, Paul E. 4, a (CD Bowen, Ken L. PW: Vivarium EgreES Ken/Bruce, We need to develop test scripts and a schedule for performing the below mentioned test. Please coordinate together and get with Craig and Ron to identify any ET resources you need. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance. and Engineering Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Preoention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W.. MS: 13-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 O?ice; 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Ceil: 404.591.2599 5% Pirate earrsia?er the he?n?e prettiest; this e-eraii From: Raymond, George Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:54 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Jue, Bruce R. Knob, Stephen H. Walpole, Kenneth K. Bel?ower, Craig Wigington, Darryl Cc: Chandler, ?an '2 252m,- ubiect: - iiuarium Egress This is FMEO response to BFO DD and OSHE to address the OSHA complaint of violation of the NFPA 101 Lifesafety code and a testing scenario for the vivarium area HVAC system, fire alarm system and door opening force under AHU supply fan failure. Paul Probst's email below dated 1t20i2011 references the commissioning report dated 12l23i2010. In that report it stated; ?the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the Na tionai Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15ibf. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 too.? As Paul stated in his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.3.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof en closures using stair pressurization shalt use and approved engineered system with a design pressure difference across the barrier of not less than .05 in water coiumn in sprinklered buiidings or .1 in water coiumn in nonsprinklered buiidings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure dh?j'erence under likely conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure di??erence across doors sh ali exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by a force of 30ibf in accordance with 7.2.14.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fuil'y open on door monuoiiy in or means of egress sh oi! not exceed ISibf to release the iotch, 30ihf to set the door in motion, and 15 ihf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shoii not exceed Slh? These forces sholi be oppiied to the iotch stiie. ?Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing buiiding shod not exceed SOibf oppiied to the iotch stil?e? Translations, it takes 15lbf to engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, (SOIbfin and existing building}, 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12/23f2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation Measured USE. rd. 2rW?d) totoi door?opening force, ih; ch force to overcome door closer, it); door oreo, ft A door oreo, ?2 dp pressure di?Ference across door, in. of water diston ce from doorknob to edge of knob side of door, It Under these measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. However, if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may $62.1i?Ed?isggnisales in a supply we adjust the door closure force on these doors to under Elba these door will he in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. Door calculation under supply fan failure operation 2'42 252'ill1: fbl[3:242 SC. 262aih' FM EO has developed the following test scenarios to con?rm the following; I Current operating condition under system failure and ?re alarms in the build. - Total door opening force under system failure and ?re alarm in the building ?i193 re fqrceqn. .. to 5mf and test during supply fan failure and alarm 262mb; conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm General building Fire alarm Supply fan failure Stairwell pressure fans {Everything but a pull station starts the fans) Freeze protections. Fire alarm svstem Scenario Verify Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by the ?re alarm system. Test Matrix Fire STAIRWELL DOORS States alarm AHU EXHAUST FANS 0K Normal Normal ON ON OFF YES. AHU dual Fan Failure (AHU Safetyr Interlock] Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON UN General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pullstations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. Doors that will be tested are listed as follows; SC 2E2auu ti]J These doors were identi?ed during the original construction as egress doors and were tested to meet NFPA 101 and ADA requirement. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W, MS: 17-04 Attm?zta, GA 30333 O?ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1585 Cell: 402125972599 5% Please consider toe ammoniteth be?ts pia'ao'eg res e-mat! From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIGCODIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9: 15 AM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) {213333;}? EW: :IVWanum Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOKBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM To: Williams Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) 39.42 . . Wed. Vivarium Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report. it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lbf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 12.1.4.5. Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lbf. Since the project modi?ed air ?ow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore. we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 0): Report 2. NFPA 101 3. Formula H: - - CDC NFPA 101 - ashraeFormIa.de C): 2000.de a 252mm. For ease of reference. this is what the Cx report states: ?The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety' Handbook?. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushipull the door inwardfoutuvard before turning the handle and opening the door." Mathe, Chester (cocrocoorosem From: Probsl, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 2:38 PM To: Ray d, George (co-crocoollaFo; - FW: Vivarium From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 3:00 PM To: Probst Paul E. Sanchez, Anthony Howard, William (Bill) . Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Daniels, Charles E. Blanchard, Thomas M. Nogueira, William P. Tyler, John (CDCIOCOOIBFO) 252w - u?ivarium All, Per requested attached is the Ex Report from Air Analysis and drawings showing the actual final airflows as set by Air Analysis and the measured pressure differential across the doors. Call if you have questions. Regards, ?mt P33119453 ARI CDC P200945 AM TAB CFM and 262all'lj- Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-QT Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: tie?assess? Cell: 404-825-6327 Fax: ?ll-4884657 i Karen Moss RE. email: KMosslf?mcgov From: Prohst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOJBFO) Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:32 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Lingler, ArE'r R. (CDCIDCODIBFO) .mls:42 so . . 2ssalh- Ivarlum KarenlArt: L3HE Copying you on an e-mail sent by SE results show success. Karen - regarding items 2 and 3 below, will Air Analysis be turning over something we can share? Please call if necessary. Thanks, Paul 404-839-0505 I'Erll'3}i42 USE. 2523[h_i From: Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:26 PM To: Probst, Paul E. ?3,425,155 yoward, (Bill) 252mm ivarium Paul, 1 think there needs to be 1] a simple statement/memo from OSHE to the programs on their take mayr have a checklist from the final walk through], 2] a BFO document simva outlining the testing performed (Dec 28) and results {is the contractor providing something?), and 3} there needs to be some documentation of the ?new? air ?ow in the area that can be presented to DSAT (Roman can provide a snapshot of numbers right before it is ready to be occupied). if dnn?i? sad to be more than 1 page each. Keep it simple. LI 535 2623th From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) mber 29, 2010 1:39 PM Cc: Howard, William (Bill) ina?iilii? .RE ivarlum US 0 202aihr What kind of ?report and associated documents? are we talking about? Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 ms 42 use. .5 2:32am; From wits-'49 '53 Wednesday, December 29, 2010 81 i I I 262mb}? TD: . ambutc, 2523th i .. .. . - (CDCIOIDI Pfi- I t] 2m)? to the programs he appears to be of the opinion of FMEO and OSHE that the is involved, there might something else that the R0 would want. Need to discuss this, but I think these int-(3. A: US i: le3i42 252alh} IDH3I42 252mb; {plasma EBEelh} Cc: ??bject: - _ Vivarium All, coo/ocooxosnm; Howard, William (Bill) (cociocoO/oSHE); Probst, Paul E. (cocmcooreFO) appears to have gone very well [Dec 28), and I believe programs should expect a report and associated documents indicating this sometime in January. The return to service date oflan 10 is still in effect, as there are a few things that need to be ?xed and installed, followed by a final clean up by Goodwill. There is now a need for program operation protocols to be modi?ed to reflect changes in entering, reentering, exiting, etc. This will be a major agenda item for the Jan 13 HOG meeting. When ready, please send the ?les to OSHE and for review. Many thanks to all those who contributed to the looks very good and is a major improvement to the facilitv. Page 385 use. 252mm a air analysis of atlanta, inc. 1520 pine log rd conyers, gs 3DO11 929-3155 (WU) 483-7365 fax nvac consulting test and balance commissioning int-rs}. 42 uses 252m n: tot-i3} 42 2E2alli: Ilbfi3i242 2623013- US Cl 252mb:- ibiiE-l 42 2E2alli: 252nm:- . Ilb:I23::a12 USE 252mb:- {biIBt-iE HE. 262mm tbii?3r42 262mb:- ibiiE, 42 US 262aln; US 0 252aih; December 28. 2010 Karen Moss, PE CDC Building 18 Lab Renovation Cx Functional Test Documentation Atlanta, GA HVAC Mod Cx Functional Tests Documentation: . Faill: by throwing disconnect on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two .. position damper closes and exhaust plenum static control damper modulates to -- in static pressure set point w.c. for the exhaust system Lyes _no. - maintains pre-failure operating conditions ?yes _no. All labs maintain required directional air?ow yes _no. RestoreEl into operation and allow system to stabilize. - 'F'ai'lby throwing disconnect on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position damper closes and exhaust plenum static control damper modulates to In static pressure set point w.c. for the exhaust system 5 yes _no. maintains pre-faiiure operating conditions 3 yes _no. All labs maintain required directional air?ow 5 yes _no. Expected results: The remainirig?s?ii?p?ply'fan -- Ibii3ii42 LI.S.C .4 continues to operate and the VFD Speeds up and maintains supply duct static pressure set point 1.5"w.c. for the supply air system; yes _no. Both . 5 continue to operate normally 3 yes All labs maintain required directional airflow 5 yes, _no. "R?'sto'te to normal operation and allow system to stabilize. one fan-B- on- Expected results: The remaining supply tan continues to operate and the VFD speeds up and maintains supply duo @3342 pressure set point 1.5"w.c. for the supply air system; yes Both - 262mb} continue to operate normally yes _no. All labs maintain required directional airflow 3 yes no. Restore the system to normal operation. 8-: F-ail- by throwing disconnects on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position damer closes and exhaust plenum static control damper down both supply air fans and related isolation yes _no. All labs required directional airflow is not maintained. 5 yes _no. 9. Restore the system to normal operation. C: - . . tenses use. tits-t? US 3 .. -10.. Expected results: Ico'ntmues to operate 5 down. Both exhaust fan plenum dampers open 100%. 3 yes__ no. Lab suite maintains negative pressure to surrounding areas. a yes _Jno. All lab directional air ?ow is not maintained _yes no. Required strength to open exit doors from the lab suite is acceptable per NFPA 101 code for egress of occupant's yes. 3) no. 11. Kill powerto all four fans simultaneously was suggested. Expected results: Lab suite directional air?ow is not maintained )3 yes _no. Air?ow patterns in the suite are directional to the cage wash area 5 yes _no. Notes: Total containment is maintained and all directional air?ow is into the labs. (2) Upon dual supply fan shutdownl egress from the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by CDCIBFOIDEMO. The Commissioning {Ci-r) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also. on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushipull the door inwardioutward before turning the handle and opening the door. Pressure Differentials across Suite Eoress Doors SC. 53 2132301 (3) Firet?Smoke Mode was not commissioned. During FireiSmoke Mode, dual supply fan shut down is commanded and stairwell pressurization fans start up and run. Exhaust tans run as described in it 9 ofthe 0): Report. The combination of excessive negative pressure on the lab ?oor and the pressurization of stairwells in FireiSmoke Mode would cause the door opening forces mentioned in item #2 to increase signi?cantly. (4) Air Analysis of Atlanta was informed by that the assumes responsibility for accepting the Vivarium to be re?opened with known code violation, and CDCEBFOJFMEO will initiate a separate project to address this issue". Page 2788 use. 252mm bh3142 2623dH Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Raymond, George Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 2:19 PM To: Probst. Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. .. Egress fyi George K. Raymond Depnty Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, NW, MS: 13-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 Of?ce: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1635 Cell: 404.597.2599 5% Please eensia?er fee ennireninenr before printing their e?rnai! LLS 2&2mhi From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCDOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 2:08 PM To: Chandler, George (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sitinject: : Vivarium Egress The original finding were questioned. See Paul email below. [think the format of the question should have went back to Karen Moss and Air Analysis and not to the for an interpretation. However, during the project, the "team" was dysfunctional and all FMED questions or comments were discredited by Ms. Moss and her consultants. Paul?s conversation and request to Jeff (and onlyJeif) was an attempt to get management in the loop. George K. Raymond Deputy Director ties Maintenance and Engineering O?ice Carters for Disease Control ans1r Preaentien 1600 Cit?on Road, MN, MS: F?Osi Aiian ta, GA 30333 Oj?ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Ceii: 404.597.2599 5% Pierre wander the eneimnneeni? {Jeferepn'nring as e-rnan' From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 12:10 PM To: Raymond, George Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffe Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Subject: Re ivarium Egress George - Jei'f must approve the final based on his role as and for consistency with our previous analysis. The response below does not appear to me to be consistent with previous discussions and, furthermore, begs the question of why the original Consultant's report was not questioned if we do not concur with its ?ndings. Thanks! $313142 EBZalh- G: From: Raymond, George Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:53 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Jae, Bruce R. Knob, Stephen H. Walpole, Kenneth K. Belflower, Craig Wigington, Darryl Cc: Chandler, ?llbiect: ligiivarium Egress This is FM E0 response to BFG OD and OSHE to address the OSHA complaint of violation ofthe NFPA 101 Life safety code and a testing scenario for the Vivarium area HVAC system, fire alarm system and door opening force under AHU supply fan failure. Paul Probst's email below dated 1l20i2011 references the commissioning report dated ?i2i28i2010. In that report it stated; ?the force required to open doors during fan failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force perihis code in a means of egress is 15ibf. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 As Paul stated in his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.3.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure difference across the barrier afoot less than .05 in water column in sprinklered buildings or .1 in water column in nonsprinlclered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure difference under likelyr conditions of stock effector wind. The pressure difference across doors shall exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by a force of 30lbf in accordance with 7.2.14.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fully open an door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed 15lbf to release the latch, 30lbf to set the door in motion, and to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-bin ged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Slbf. These forces shall be applied to the latch stile.? "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed SOlbf applied to the latch stile Translations, it takes 15 hfto engage the latch on the door, 30 hf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, {50ibf in and existing building], 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12f28l2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: 112 US I: Door calculation under normal operation 11: U5 ?26?all1l 5.20fW?A?dg! 2(w-d) =?totoi door?opening force, lb, Fat force-to overcome door closer, lb, door area, ft A door area, dp pressure difference across door, in. of Water distance from doorknob to edge of knob side of door, fr Under these measurements, calculations and interpretation ofthe code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. However, if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure condition; -- door closure force on these doors to under 5 bfl'these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. SE. 2?23fh.- FMEO has developem 42 252mb. Current operating condition under system failure and fire alarms in the build. Total door opening force under system failure and fire alarm in the building door closure force on. . and alarm conditions. Testing Scenario IHVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm General building ?re alarm Supply fan failure Stairwell pressure fans {Everything but a pull station starts the fans) Freeze protections. Fire alarm svstem Scenario Verify Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by the ?re alarm system. mm States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST STAIRWELL FANS DOORS 0K Normal Normal ON ON OFF YES AHU dual Fan Failure Safety Interlock) Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THESMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. Doors that will be tested are listed as follows; [as to and test during supply fan failure 101 and ADA requirement. George K. Raymond These doors were identi?ed during the original construction as egress doors and were tested to meet NFPA Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O??lce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA 30333 O?ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1585 Cell: 404.59 7,2599 5% Pfeore som'z'der foe enoiromaeor bty'or'e prim,?ng {be} e?raei! From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCODKBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM To_: Raymond, George (CDCIOCDDIBFO) ill-st? Sitbiect: I: Vivariurn Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM To: Williams Jeffery (CDCIDCDOIBFO) $55323. Vivarium Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. in the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is '15 Ibf and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount [45 lbf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 72.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lhf. Since the project modi?ed air flow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Attachments: Cx Report 2. NFPA 101 2000 16 00 Clifton Road, MN, MS: i 3. ASHRAE Formula - EDCX 101 - 2000.pdf>> ssashrae formulapdfee For ease of reference. this is what the C): report states: "The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supva fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessarj,r to pushfpull the door inwardfoutward before turning the handle and opening the door.? Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 1:57 PM 5 Ray d, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) 12633111:? ucbjoot: .. RE: Vivarium Egress I am going to call. On phone with Bruce right now. Answer the phone. From: Raymond, George Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 1:56 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (cocrocooreFo) $321114? Si??eot: RE: Uivarium Egress Yea George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O??i?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Cft'ffol't Rood, N.W., MS: Atlanta, GA 30333 Q?fce: 404.639.3335 Fox: 404.639.1635 all: 404. 59 7.2599 3% Please consider the environment before printing no some? From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 1:55 PM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOKBFO) IhH3r42 : Vivarium Egress You there. From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:54 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Jue, Bruce R. Koob, Stephen H. Walpole, Kenneth K. Bel?ower, Craig Wigington, Darryl Cc: Chandler, George gb?i'zii?? sti?ed: FW: Divariurn Egress This is FM E0 response to BFO OD and OSHE to address the OSHA complaint of violation ofthe NFPA 101 Life safety code and a testing scenario for the Vivarium area HVAC system, ?re alarm system and door opening force under AHU supply fan failure. Paul Probst's email below dated 1t20i2011 references the commissioning report dated 12i28i2010. In that report it stated: ?the force required to open doors during supply tan failure does not meet the Nationai Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum aliowabie force per this code in a means of egress is 15ib? The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 ibtJ. As Paul stated in his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.23.9.1 it states; "5m oke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shalt use and approved engineered system with a design pressure difference across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinkiered baiidings or .1 in water coiumn in nonsprin ldered buiidings, and shail be capable of maintaining the pressure difference under iikely conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure dt?eren ce across doors sh alt exceed that which oiiows the door to begin to open by a force af30ibf in accordance with 12.1.4.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 72.1.4.5 it states; ?The forces required to fully open any door man unity in a means of egress sh alt not exceed ISlbf to reiease the iotch, 30ibf to set the door in motion, and 15ibf to open the door to the minimum required width. 'Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without ciosure shoii not exceed Sib? These forces sh all' be appiied to the latch stiie. "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shaii not exceed SOibf oppiied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 15lbf to engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, {SOIhfin and existing huiiding], 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12/28/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation H?nacl Ire-H ?3 C5 ?2523Ihl Door calculation under normal operation Measured Measured 42 5.20 A rd, wa-dl rota! door?opening force, lb; Fm, =force to overcome door cfoser, lb; a'oor area, fr A door area, ff? dp pressure dilj?erence across door, in- of water if distoncefrorn doorknob to edge ofknob side ofdoor,ft Under these measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. However, if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure condition; 553700, 553900 and 553901. If we adjust the door closure force on these doors to under so, these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. Door calculation under supply fan failure operation [til-i3 :12 US Cl FMEO has developed the following test scenarios to con?rm the following; a Current operating condition under system failure and fire alarms in the build. - Total door opening force under system failure and ?re alarm in the building 0 Adjust door closure force onl conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire aIarm General building Fire alarm Supply fan failure Itl_iI'Ei 42 ta and test during supply fan failure and alarm Stairweil pressure fans (Everything but a pull station starts the fans} Freeze protections. Fire alarm system Scenario Verify Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by the ?re alarm system. Test Mini Fire STAIRWELL DOORS States alarm AHU EXHAUST FANS OK Normal Normal ON ON OFF YES AHLI dual Fan Failure (AHU Safety Interlock) Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON UN General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN 0N Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. ?oors that will be tested are listed as follows; OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap} These doors were identi?ed during the original construction as egress doors and were tested to meet NFPA 101 and ADA requirement. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce Disease Contra! and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, 1145:1104 Atlanta, GA 30333 Ojj?ics: 404.639.3335 Fax: 40?.639. 1635 Cali: 404. 5912599 5513585253 consider me gamma-linear be?ts} ?ning an c?nraz'i From: Probst, Paul E. (coqocoorsFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM To: Raymond, Subject: FW: - FYI rge Vivarium Egress From: Protest, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM To: Willie ms Subject Jeff: I- ]effery (CDCKOCOOKBFD) I 3242 IC r- Vivarium Egress This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. in the report. it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount {45 lbf}. The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 72.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lbf. Since the project modi?ed air ?ow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. Ci: Report 2. NFPA 101 -2000 3. ASHRAE Formula C3 e: File: Asst-E6814 - .coc Cx Filo: NFPA 101 2000.pdf>> ?31 File: ashrae formulapdf 3-- For ease of reference. this is what the C): report states: "The Commissioning (Cir) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook?. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushi?pull the door inwardioutward before turning the handle and opening the door." Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday. June 20. 2012 1:55 PM To; Ray George fess You there. From: Raymond, George Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:54 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFOM Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Jue, Bruce R. Koob, Stephen H. Walpole, Kenneth K. Bel?ower, Craig Wigington, Darryl UHWCE: Chandler, -- f/iyarium Egress This is FMEO response to BFO DD and OSHE to address the OSHA complaint of violation of the NFPA 101 Life safety code and a testing scenario for the Vivarium area HVAC system, ?re alarm system and door opening force under AHU supply fan failure. Paul Probst?s email below dated 1i20i2011 references the commissioning report dated 132812010. In that report it stated; "the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 1?01 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum aliowabie force per this code in a means of egress is 15ibf. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 As Paul stated in his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.3.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization sh use and approved engineered system with a design pressure dih?erence across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklered huiidings or .1 in water column in nonspriniriered buildings, and shoii be cap able of maintaining the pressure dhfi?erence under iikeiy conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure difference across doors shaii exceed that which aiiows the door to begin to open by aforce of 30ihf in accordance with 7.2.1.45? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fatty open any door monuoiiy in a means of egress shalt not exceed 15in to reieaSe the iotch, to set the door in motion, and iSibf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without ciosure shaii not exceed 5th}! These forces sh he applied to the latch stile. "Exception No. I: the opening force for existing doors in existing huiiding shall not exceed S?ibf appiied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 15lbfto engage the latch on the door, 301bf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, lSOlbf in and existing building). 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12(28/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using-normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation ancnrad imi? US Cl ?EBEaih Door calculation under normal operation Measured Measured innit-12 ?3 C. 28231]! Wi?Aiidgi Pd, 2(W?d} totoi door-opening force, lb; Fd, force to overcome door closer, in, door ore-o, fit A door oreo, )?t2 dp pressure di??erence across door, in. of water 0' distance from doorknob to edge of knob side of door, ft Under these measurements, calculations and interpretation ofthe code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. However, if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may' cause an issues in a supply fan failure condition; Hi we adjust the door closure force on these doors to under Slhf, these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. Door calculation under supply fan failure operation EL. 5 2525.11- FMEO has developed the following test scenarios to con?rm the following; a Current operating condition under system failure and fire alarms in the build. I Total door opening force under system failure and ?re alarm in the building I Adjust door closure force USE m2? I to Eli}, and test during supply fan failure and alarm conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm General building Fire alarm Supply fan failure Stairwell pressure fans (Everything but a pull station starts the fans) Freeze protections. 3 Fire alarm svstem Scenario Verify Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by the fire alarm system. Igt Matrix Fire STAIRWELL DOORS States alarm AHU EXHAUST FANS OK Normal Normal ON ON OFF YES AHU dual Fan Failure (AHU Safety Interlock} Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pullstations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL on THE MAIN LEVEL. Doors that will be tested are listed as follows; OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap} These doors were identi?ed during the original construction as egress doors and were tested to meet NFFA 101 and ADA requirement. 55'} from some? owiroomam be?ra prirr?rgg n55: a?moiz.? From: '?i'ii Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM To:_ Raymond, (CDCIOCOOIBFO) ivarium Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, January 20,r 2011 8:18 AM To; Willia E?s?ew 55 . . zeaaih guhjeetr- Ivanum Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about'in late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lbt]. The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lbf. Since the project modi?ed air flow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. Cx Report 2. NFPA 101 - 2000 3. ASH RAE Formula Altman Cx Report.pdf>} File: NFPA 101 2001].de File: ashrae formulapdf a} For ease of reference, this is what the Cx report states: ?The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force perthis code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushlpull the door inwardfouhaard before turning the handle and opening the door.? Mathe, Chester masseuse a; From: Probst Paul E. 339$" Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 To: Jae, Bruce R. Subject: Egress From: Chandler, George Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 12:10 PM To: Raymond, George Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Bowen, Ken L. 262mm- Su l'v?ivarium Egress George - Jeff must approve the ?nal based on his role as AHJ and for consistency with our previous analysis. The response below does not appear to me to be consistent with previous discussions and, furthermore, begs the question of why the original Consultant's report was not questioned if we do not concur with its ?ndings. Thanks! G.- From: Raymond, George Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:53 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Jue, Bruce R. Koob, Stephen H. Walpole, Kenneth K. Belfiower, Craig Wigington, Darryl my? ghandler, George 2523?- Subiect:.. FW:I:'Jivarium Egress This is FMEO response to BFO OD and DSHE to address the OSHA complaint of violation ofthe NFPA 101 Life safety code and a testing scenario for the Vivarium area HVAC system, fire alarm system and door opening force under AHU supply fan failure. Paul Probst's email below dated 1l20i2011 references the commissioning report dated 1212832010. In that report it stated; ?the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15lbf. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount {45 lbi?). As Paul stated in his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.3.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure dWeren ce across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklered buildings or .1 in water column in nonsprinklered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure dr?erence under likely conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure di??erence across doors shall exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by a force of 30ibf in accordance with 12.1.4.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed to release the latch, 30lbf to set the door in motion, and ISihf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Slbf. These forces shall be applied to the la stile.? "Exception No. l: the opening Jforce for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed S?lbf applied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 151bf to engage the latch on the door, BUlbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, [50Ibf in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: IE E1 1. LUKE ll? HE C1 5 252 9th Door calculation under normal operation Measured ll: LLE C. 5; 252ml- A Far: ZfW-d) total door-openin force, ibf ch =force to overcome door closer; lb): door area, ft A door area, dp pressure d?j?eren ce across door, in. of water distance from doorknob to edge of knob side of door, ft Under these measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition escaption of the code, the doors are in compliance. However, if the Existi exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure condition; .I ifweadjust! so]: . door closure force on these doors to under 5!be these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. Door calculation under supply fan failure operation LI 5 FM E0 has developed the following test scenarios to confirm the following; I Current operating condition under system failure and ?re alarms in the build. I Total door opening force under system failure and fire alarm in the building I Adjust door closure force on ?313"? 5? 2mm" to and test during supply fan failure and alarm conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm General building Fire alarm Supply fan failure Stairwell pressure fans (Everything but a pull station starts the fans) Freeze protections. Fire alarm system Scenario Verify Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by the fire alarm system. We States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUSTSTAIRWELL FANS DOORS OK Normal Normal ON ON OFF YES AHU dual Fan Normal OFF MIN OFF Ductdetector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. Doors that will be tested are listed as follows; a These doors were identi?ed during the original construction as egress doors and were tested to meet NFPA 101 and ADA requirement. George K. Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O??ice Centersfor Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: 13-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 O?ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 555me13 swede?? the: swimmers! b?araprdatz?ng Ibir Myer! From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) . . - Ewanum Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM To: Williams Jeffery 31:31.3? meets Vivarium Egress lbiiE? 42 us i: 262301: Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lbf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 12.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lbf. Since the project modi?ed air flow to the system, We feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. ex Report 2. NFPA 101 2000 3. ASHRAE Formula ss??l'it?'?t130'le CK Report. pdfae 101 - 2000.pdf>> <> 252m,- i For ease of reference, this is what the Cx report states: ?The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supva fan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook?. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushipull the door inwardioutward before turning the handle and opening the door." Mathe, Chester (cocrocoorosee) From: Williams. Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFU) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 12:30 PM To: Chandler, George Raymond, George Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Bowen, Ken L. a, (CDCIOCOOIBFO) . .. RE: Divanum Egress Just had a discussion with Paul (Meechan) and he is drafting the official response on this and will have it ready for our review prior to submission to OSHA by C03 today. We both agree that there still exists a violation of NFPA 101, section 7.2.1.4.5 and will address it with adjustments to the door closers and subsequent series of tests as identified below. This is consistent with our original direction from our previous analysis and meetings last week. Thl-E, Jeff From: Chandler, George (CDCKOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 12:10 PM To: Raymond, George Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffrl Bowen, Ken L. Subject: Re: 7 a ivarium Egress George Jeff must approve the final based on his role as AHJ and for consistency with our previous analysis. The response below does not appear to me to be consistent with previous discussions and, furthermore, begs the question of why the original Consultant?s report was not questioned if we do not concur with its ?ndings. Thanks! From: Raymond, George (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:53 AM To: Probst, Paui E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken 1.. Jue, Bruce R. Koob, Stephen H. Walpole, Kenneth K. Bel?ower, Craig Wigington, Darryl (CDCIOCOOIBFO) ?(.Zhandler, 1m 'ge L. 202mm gouache-"PW: Vivarium Egress This is FMED response to BFO OD and OSHE to address the OSHA complaint of violation of the NFPA 101 Life safety code and a testing scenario for the Vivarium area HVAC system, ?re alarm system and door opening force under AHU supply fan failure. Paul Probst?s email below dated 1i20i2011 references the commissioning report dated 12i28i2010. In that report it stated; "the force required to open doors duringr supply fan failure does not meet the ivrai?iona.f Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum aiiowaole force per this code in a means of egress is 1 ?ibf. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 ib?. 1 As Paul stated in his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.33.1 it states; "Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization sh all use and approved engineered system with a design pressure dhfference across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklered buildings or .1 in water calamn in nonsprinklered buildings, and shall be capable of main taining the pressure di?erence under likely conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure dijj?erence across doors shall exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by a force of 30lbf in accordance with 22.1.4.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.1.4.5 it states; . "The forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed 15lhf . to release the latch, 30lbf to set the door in motion, and to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Elbf. These forces shall he applied to the latch stile.? ?Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed 5 Olhf applied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 15 bfto engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, (SDIbfin and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under fan failure operation [bliSli-? SE. 252nm Door calculation under normal operation Measured 1::ch 'tl' 2 total dooropening force, ibf Far: force to overcome door closer, lib; door oreo, ft A door oreo,ft2 do pressure di?erence ocross door, in. of water distance from doorknob to edge of knob side of door, ft Under these measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception ofthe code, the doors are in compliance. However, if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure condition -- - we. adju?lzi?lmi door closure force on these doors to under 5lbf, these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. Door calculation under supply fan failure operation US C. FMEO has developed the following test scenarios to con?rm the following; In Current operating condition under system failure and fire alarms in the build. a Total door opening force under system failure and ?re alarm in the building Lb:[3l242 5.0. - I Adjust door closure force on to and test during supply fanfallure and alarm conditicins. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm i General building Fire alarm Suppli.f fan failure Stairwell pressure fans {Everything but a pull station starts the fans) Freeze protections. Fire alarm system Scenario Verify Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documems Determine which HVAC units are affected by the fire alarm system. Test Matrix States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST STAIRWELL FANS DOORS OK Normal Normal ON ON OFF YES AHU dual Fan Failure Safety Interlock) Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Ductdetector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarmwith AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. Doors that will be tested are listed as follows; These doors were identi?ed during the original construction as egress doors and were tested to meet NFPA 101 and ADA requirement. George K. Raymond Depniy Director i?IfJ?niz-iteintnce and Engineering Office Centers for Disease Control end Prevention 1600 Clifton Reed, N.W., Atlanta, GA 30333 O??ee: 404.639.3335 fax: 404.639.1635 .404. 59 7.2599 3?5 Pieme consider rise eneimnrnenr iiefere printing this e-rneii? From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM To: Raymond George Subject: FW Vivarium Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFOJ Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM I To: Williams Jeffery :Mvarium Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium thatwe talked about in late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report. it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lbf}. The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 7.2.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lbf. Since the project modi?ed air flow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. (3): Report 2. 2000 3. ASHRAE Formula $332112 101 - ssashrae formula.pdf>> For ease of reference, this is what the Cx report states: ?The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook?. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushlpuil the door inwardfoutward before turning the handle and opening the door." Mathe, Chester From: Chandler, George Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 12:10 PM To: Raymond, George Probst, Paul E. Meecban, Paul J. Williams, Jet-fer,r Bowen, Ken L. 9 Sauchieat: . Re: ivarium Egress George - Jeff must approve the ?nal based on his role as AHJ and for consistency with our previous analysis. The response below does not appear to me to be consistent with previous discussions and, furthermore, begs the question of the original Consultant's report was not questioned if we do not concur with its findings. Thanks! Gt- From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:53 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken Jue, Bruce R. Koob. Stephen H. Walpole, Kenneth K. Belflower, Craig Wigington, Darryl I no Chandler, Gear 5353111,? Wreck: ivarium Egress This is FMEO response to BFO OD and OSHE to address the OSHA complaint ofviolation of the NFPA 101 Life safety code and a testing scenario for the Vivarium area HVAC system, fire alarm system and door opening force under AHU supva fan failure. Paul Probst's email below dated 1i20t2011 references the commissioning report dated 12i28i201u. In that report it stated; ?the force required to open doors during suppiy tan taiiure does not meet the Nationai Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum aiiowahie force per this code in a means of egress is i5ibf. The ditterentiai pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount {45 ion?? As Paul stated in his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.3.9.1lt states; "Smoke proof enciosures using stair pressurization shat! use and approved engineered system with a design pressure difference across the barrier of not iess than .05 in water coiumn in sprinidered buiidings or .1 in water coiumn in nonsprinhiered buiidings, and sh at! be capabie of maintaining the pressure difference under iikeiy conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure difference across doors shaii exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by a force of 30ibf in accordance with 12.1.4.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.1.4.5 it states; he forces required to fatty open any door manuoiiy in a means of egress shaii not exceed lSibf to reiease the iatch, 30ibf to set the door in motion, and 15ibf to open the door to the minimum 1 required width. Opening forces for the interior siderhinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shoii not exceed Sibf. These forces shoii be oppiied to the iotch stile.? "Exception No. I: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shoii not exceed SOibf applied to the in stiie? Translations, it takes 15lbf to engage the latch on the door, 30 bf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, [SDIbfin and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12/98/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation sasaalh. Door calculation under normal operation Ill I u-nnl ILHISI ll? U5 '2 5.20[W1[A2[dgl Pd, Efw-d) totoi door-opening force, Fdr=fo rce to overcome do or closer; it), door oreo, ft A door oreo, ft} dp pressure difference across door, in. of water distance from doorknob to edge ofknoo side of door, ft Under these measurements, calculations and interpretation ofthe code using the Existing condition exception ofthe code, the doors are in compliance. However, if the Existing exceptions does not applv, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure condition adjust' 2 door closure force on these doors to under Slbr, these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. [Jun]: calculating nude: 51mg]! fan failure operation Hill-3:542 USE 2523'?? FM EU has developed the following test scenarios to con?rm the following; 0 Current operating condition under system failure and fire alarms in the build. 0 Total door opening force ?under system failure and fire alarm in the building ?2EEath I Adjust door closure force onl Ito and test during supply fan failure and alarm conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm iEeneral building Fire alarm Supply fan failure Stairwell pressure fans (Everything but a pull station starts the fans) Freeze protections. Fire alarm system Scenario 1verify Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by the fire alarm system. Te_stMa_trix States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST STAIRWELL FANS DOORS OK Normal Normal ON ON OFF YES AHU dual Fan Failure (AHU Safety interlock) Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLU DES THE SMOKE CONTROL PAN EL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. Doors that will be tested are listed as follows; Lucien; These doors were identi?ed during the original construction as egress doors and were tested to meet NFPA 101 and ADA requirement. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: 13?04 Atlanta, GA 30333 O??ce: 404.639.3335 Free: 404.639.1635 Cell: 404. 597.2599 5:5 Pfeei'e consider the renaissance bg?ore printing Mi: e?meiz? From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM To: Raymond, George ?Ui?33?425iib?ect: Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM T9: Willians, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) $353.1? Wear: ivariurn Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent?s report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. in the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lbi). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 72.1.4.5. EXception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 Ibf. Since the project modi?ed air 4 flow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. C): Report 2. NFPA 101 ?_2000 3. ASHRAE Formula use. 5 262mm - {3x 101 - 2000.pdf>> <> For ease of reference, this is what the C): report states: ?The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also. on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushfpull the door inwardfoutward before turning the handle and opening the door.? {till}, :1 :?i'u??ijeot; . . .. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Raymond, George Sent: Wednesday. June 20, 2012 11:54 AM o: Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. .lue, Bruce R. Koob, Stephen H. Walpole, Kenneth K. Bel?ower, Craig Wigington, Darryl Che. George Ivarium Egress This is FM E0 response to BFO DD and USHE to address the OSHA complaint of violation of the NFPA 101 Life safety code and a testing scenario for the Vivarium area HVAC system, fire alarm system and door opening force under AHU supva fan failure. Paul Probst?s email below dated 1i20i2011 references the commissioning report dated 12l28i2010. In that report it stated; "the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15lth The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount {45 ran.? As Paul stated in his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.3.9.1 it states; ?5m oke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure di??erence across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklered buildings or .1 in water column in nonsprinldered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure difference under likely conditions ofstack ejj?ect or wind. The pressure difference across doors sh all exceed that which allows the door to - begin to open by aforce of 30lbf in accordance with 12.1.4.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety.' Code Section 12.1.4.5 it states; "the forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed 15lb,t to release the latch, 30lbf to set the door in motion, and 15lbf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Slbf. Th ese forces sh all be applied to the latch stile. "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed 50lbf applied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 151bf to engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, [SOlbt in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12l23l2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supplv tan failure operation Measured 252th 2 HE LIE C: 5262th 5.20{ awe; totoi door-opening force, ib; F3, force to overcome door cioser, ib; door oreo, ?t A door oreo, ff? dp pressure difference across do or, in. of water 0' distance from doorknob to edge of knob side ofo'oor, ft Under these measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. However, if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure conditions?3W If we adjust the door closure force on these doors to under these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. Door calculation under supply fan failure operation HE C: FMEO has developed the following test scenarios to confirm the following; a Current operating condition under system failure and fire alarms in the build. 0 Total door opening force under system failure and ?re alarm in the building 0 Adjust door closure force doll-m?d2 232W I to and test during supply fan failure and alarm conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm General building Fire alarm Supply fan failure Stairwell pressure fans (Everything but a puli station starts the fans} 2 Freeze protections. Fire alarm svstem Scenario Verify Fire alarm matrix pronided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by: the ?re alarm system. Test?m Fire STAIRWELL DOORS States alarm AHU EXHAUST FANS OK Normal Normal ON ON OFF YES AHU dual Fan Failure (AHU Safety Interlock) Normai OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pullstations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: Inna-.42. 2623Ih,? THE MAIN LEVEL. THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON Doors that will be tested are listed as follows; i These doors were identi?ed during the original construction as egress doors and were tested to meet NFPA 101 and ADA requirement. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Faciifiies Maintenance and Engineering O??fce Centm'sfor Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Rand, NW. MS: 13-04 Ariantn. GA 30333 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 3313mm consider #59 enn'r'enmem? gaging prinn'ng ibis anger! From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM I To: Raymond, ge (CDCXOCOOIBFO) FW: ILivarium Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM To: Williams, Jeffery (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Shbiect: Vivarium Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from.the 2080 edition of NFPA 101. In the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lbf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lbf. Since the project modi?ed air ?ow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. Cx Report 2. NFPA 101 - 2000 3. ASHRAE Formula AAWGBH - CDC [Ell - ashrae forn'lula.pdf tolls, 4 us i: Cx 252mm For ease of reference, this Is what the (3x report states: "The Commissioning (Ox) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook?. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 1'5 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushipull the door inwardfoutward before tumlng the handle and cpening the door.? Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM Rayr'innr, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) 262311: "Artifact: . .. Vivarium Egress FYI From: Probslz,r Paul E. Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 3:13 AM To: Williams Jeffery (CDCIOCUOKBFO) Egg?gg?bjecttx ivarium Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. have attached both the commissioning agent?s report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount {45 lbt}. The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 72214.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 501bf. Since the project modi?ed air flow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. Cx Report 2. NFPA 101 - 2000 3. ASHRAE Formula 1- CDC NFPA 101 - ashrae formula.de Cx 2am).de [13:13:42 2623.11! For ease of reference, this is what the Cx report states: ?The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supva fan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook?. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushipull the door inwardioutward before turning the handle and opening the door." a air analysis of atlanta, inc. 1520 pine log rd conyers, ga 30-011 (T70) 929-3165 (770} 4333365 fax hvac consulting test and balance commisoioning ihlij'RHE USE ZEZEHIH US 0 252mb:- US 262mb; US 0 262th_: ijn'Bi'alE LIE 0 252mb;- 2b2alhl 42 252mb? 252atli' 2B2ain; LIE 0 252mm us 0 252nm; December 28, 2010 Karen Moss. PE CDC Building 13 Lab Renovation Cx Functional Test Documentation Atlanta. GA Mod Cx Functional Tests Documentation: - Iby throwing disconnect on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two I on amper closes and exhaust plenum static control dampenmodulates to static pressure set point w.c. tor the exhaust system yes maintains pie-failure operating conditions 3 yes All labs maintain required directional airflow 3., yes _no. -- Restore into operation and allow system to stabilize. - by throwing disconnect on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position damper closes and exhaust plenum static control damper modulates to in static pressure set point w.c. for the exhaust system yes _no. maintains pre-failure operating conditions yes _no. All labs maintain required directional air?ow 5 yes Expected results: The - continues to operate and the VFD speeds up and maintains supply du pressure set point Ewe. for the supply air systemj yes _no. Both ?r continue to operate nonnaliy yes _no. All labs maintain required directions air?ow 3 yes, _no. -Restore : to normal operation and allow system to stabilize. Fail I Expected results: The remaining -- continues to operate and the VFD speeds up and maintains supply du - pressure set point Ewe. for the supply air system; yes _no. Both continue to operate normally 5 yes _no. All tabs maintain required directional air?ow 3 yes no. Restore the system to normal operation. by throwing disconnects on roof. Expected results: Exhaust plenum two position .ses and exhaust plenum static control damper closes-i-?-yes-Lno shuts down both s'u pply air fans and related isolation dampers. 3 yes _no.'All labs required directional airflow is not maintained. 1 yes _no. ib}[3i242 _..2I32al_hi ions 4: us [3 2132all'i't 9. Restore the system to normal operation. U5 3 262mm .. 10. Fail tans-ASzB'oni i Expected resultsii down. Both exhaust fan plenum dampers open 100%. 5 yes_ no. Lab suite maintains negative pressure to surrounding areasI yes _no. All lab directional air ?ow is not maintained __yes no. Required strength to open exit doors from the lab suite is acceptable per NFPA 101 code for egress of occupant's yes. X. (2. 31 no. 11. Kill powerto all four fans simultaneoust was suggested. Exgected results: Lab suite directional airflow is not maintained 5 yes _no. Airflow patterns in the suite are directional to the cage wash area 5 yes _no. Notes: (1) Total containment is maintained and all directional air?ow is into the labs. (2) Upon dual supply fan shut down, egress from the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by CDCIBFOIDEMO. The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force perthis code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force percode. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader: it was necessary to pushfpull the door inwardfoutward before turning the handle and opening the door. Pressure Differentials across Suite Egress Doors mus use - 24323.n- (3) Firemeoke Mode was not commissioned. During FireiSmol-te Mode1 dual supply fan shut clown is commanded and stairwell pressurization fans start Up and run. Exhaust tans run as described in 9 ofthe Cx Report. The combination of excessive negative pressure on the lab ?oor and the pressurization of stairwells in FireiSmoite Mode would cause the door opening forces mentioned in item #2 to increase signi?cantly. Air Analysis of Atlanta was informed by that the assumes responsibility for accepting the Vivarium to be re-opened with known code violation, and will initiate a separate project to address this issue". saitl??tdrevi MEANS OF EGRESS ?r of doors is. prodded. not less than one of the doors shall provide not less than a 32-in. (SI-cm) clear width opening. Exception No. 1: Ext access doors sewing a room not exceeding ?0 ?2 {6.5 m2) and not required to be accessible to fictions with sooere mobil- ity impairments shalt be not less than 24 in. {til cot) in door leaf width. tion No. 2: Doors serving a building orportion thereof not no- tted to he mnlde to persons with severe mobility impairments shall trope-minted to he 28 in. 1? 71' em) in. door toafroidth. Exegbtion No. In existing: buildings, the existing door leaf width shallot not less than 28' in. cm). Minn No. 4: This requirement shalt not apply or otherwise pro- vided in Chapters 22 and 2.3. Exception No. 5: This requirement shall not apply to interior doors as provided in Chapter 24. Exception No. 6: A power-operated door leaf located within a moo-leaf opening shall he the minimum 32-in. (Si-cm) single-teat in accordance with Excajllim No. 2 to 7.2.1.9. lion No. This requirement shalt not rigid} to revolving doors as provided in 12.110. 1.2.1.3 Floor Level. The elevation of the floor surfaces on ?l?both sides of a door shall not vary by more than Us in. (1.3 cm]. The elevation shall be maintained on both sides of the doors-ta}r for a distance not less than the width of the widest loaf. Thresholds at doorways shall not exceed 1/2 in. (1.3 cm] in height. Raised thresholds and no or level changes in eacess of 1/4 in. {0.64 cm] at doonrays shall he bevelled with aslo not steeper than 1 in 2. Emption No. i: In one- and two-family detailing: and in existing buildings where the door discharges to the outside or to an exterior hol- sonjr ?exterior exit access, the ?oor level outside the door shalt be Ioer- mitt-rd to he one step lower than the inside, out shat! not be in excess of 3 in. (20.3 on) ioroor.? l. ##tPlionNo. 2: in one- and two-family dwellings and assisting trot-id- mg}. a door at the top of a stair shalt be permitted to open directly at a Provided that the door does not swing over the stair and the door ?Hinton area with on occupant load offewor than 50 persons. 12.1.4 Swing and Force to Open- i liq-44" Any door in a means of egress shall be of the side- -. or pivoted-aomging type. The door shall he designed to hidso that 1t is capable of swinging from an}' position required width of the opening in which it is I: gliding door: as provided in Chafrtors 22 and 23, .. in Chapters 24, 32, and 33. fr $32: ?one permitted in Chapters 12 through 42, sme- - - ?mtml rotting security grilles or doors that are part ?f'fm?mf of egress shall be permitted, provided that they "or?an than when secured in the full open. occupancy by the goneralpultlic. I or door; there shall he a reodii}l ois- . than i in. (2.5 cm) high on acon? asfoiiotos: . To sateen anon rs occrooso . I he brought to the closed position when Wdaurly.w Eli-1] q-Hf?? 101?45 Doors or shall he operohle?om within the space without tit: use ofan} garnet hno wledgc or e?'ort. Where two or more means git-grass are required, not marathon halt attire omens q?egms shall he equipped roith horizontal sliding or vertical rotting or doors. Exception No. 3: Hoiizmttal sliding doors complying with 22.1.14 shall be permitted. Eruption No. 4: Doors to private gnrages, hotness areas, industrial areas, and storage areas with an occupant load not exceeding it), whores-och private garages, business areas, industrial areas, and stor- age areas contain low or ordinary hazard contents, shall be ?om this requirement. ?ception No. 5: Revolving doors complying with ?.2.1.It.l shall he pmnittod. EJijtrtion No. ti: Existing fusible link-operated horizontal sliding or vertical rolling?re doors shall be permitted to he used as provided in Chapters 12 through 42. $11.41 Doors required to be of the side-hinged or pivotedm swinging ape shall swing in the direction of e55 navel where seroin a room?E??r area mi? an occupant load of 5D or more. I'd-rd- Excdtion No. Doors in horizontal exits shalt not he required to swing in the direction ofegrers travel where wempted in 7.2.4.16. Exception No. 2: Smoke has-tier doors sh all not he required to sitting in the direction ofegmts travel as provided in Chapter 1 9. 12.1.4.3 A door shall String in the direction of egress travel where used in an exit enclosure or where sewing a high hat-hj ard contents area, unless it is a door from an indisidual living unit that opens directly into an exit enclosure. kills?? During its swing, any door in a means of egress shall leave not lees than one-half of the required width of an aisle, corddor, passageway, or landing unobstructed and shall not project more an in. (17.3 cm) into the required width of an aisle, corridor. p?ifcway, or landing, when foil}r open. Doors shall not open directlr onto a stair without a landing. The ?ding shall have a width not less than the width of the door. {See 7.2.1.3.) Exception: .l'n existing buildings, a door providing access to a stair shalt not ire required to maintain any minimum unobstructed width duringits sodng, provided that it meets the requirement that limits pro- jection to not more than 7 in. (17.8 cm) into the required width are stair orianding when the door open. -122. 114.5 The forces required to fully open any door manually in a? means of egress shall not exceed 15 Hal? N) to release thalalch, 30 {135 to set the door in motiort,_and 15 lbl' (57 N) to open the door to the minimum required width. Dp? suing forces 1for interior'side-ltinged or pivotedeninging .doors without closers shall not exceed 5 522 These forces shall be applied at the latch stile. Exit-prion No: opening'force existing in existing, "?ttlhiings shalt not am: so tb?222 to applied to latch on. Etheption No. 2: The opening forces for horizontolsiiding doors shall he as protests in Chapters 22 and 23. Exception No. 3: The opening forces for pummerated doors shall he Mpmoided to 12.1.9. 12.1.4.6 Screen doors and.stortn doors used in a means of egress shall be subject to the requirements for direction of swing that are applicable to other doprs used in a means of egress. Edltlon . . u- 52.6 Examples 2 and 3 demonstrate that the air needed to prevent smoke backflow can support an extremely large ?re. Most com- mercial and residential buildings contain enough fuel (paper, card- board, furniture, etc.) to support very large ?res. Even when the arnount of file] is normally very small, short-term fuel loads (dur- ing building renovation, material delivery, etc.) can be signi?cant. Therefore, using airflow for smoke control is not except when the ?re is suppressed or in the rare cases when fuel can be restricted with con?dence. Example 2. What air?ow at a doorwoy is needed to stop smoke backilow from a room hilly involved in ?re, and how large a ?re can this airflow support? A room fully involved in ?re can have an energy release rate on the order of 8 I 105 Btui'h. Assume the door is 3 ft wide and ft high. From Equation (ID), V, seats a: loin)? too rpm. a flaw duough the doorway of 790 3 16,600 c?n is needed to prevent smoke from backtlowiog into the area. If all the oxygen in this airflow is consumed in the ?re, the heat lib- erated is 16,60!) c?n 5850 Etuth- c?n 107 Earth. This is over It] times more than the heat generated by the fully involved room ?re and indicates why air?ow is generally not recommended for smoke mutml in buildings. Example 3. What air?ow is needed to stop smoke backllow from a waste- beskct ?re, and how large a ?re can this air?ow support? A westcbasket ?re can have an energy release rate on the order of 105 have. Asia Example 2, v, scars note)?3 am ?ne. a ?ow through the doorway ofd I [l 3 ?i 6500 is needed to prevent smoke hack? ow. If all the oxygen in this air?ow is consumed in the ?re, the heat lib- erated is soon ofm 5350 anon-can as to? Broth. This is still many times greater than the fully involved room ?re and further indi- cates why air?ow is generally not recommended for smoke control in buildings. Buoyancy The buoyancy of hot combustion gases is used in both fan- powered and non-fan-powcred venting systems. Fan?powered venting for large spaces is commonly used for atriums and cov- ered shopping malls, and non-fan-powered venting is commonly used for large industrial and storage buildings. There is a cencem that sprinkler ?ow will cool the smoke, reducing buoyancy and thus the system e?'ectivcness. Research is needed in this area. Refer to Klotc and Milkc (2602) and NFPA Standards 9213 and 204 for detailed design information about these systems. SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN Donn-Opening Forces The door?opening forces resulting from the pressure differences produced by a smoke control system must he considered. Unreason- ath high door-opening forces can make it di?icult or impossible for occupants to open doors to refuge areas or escape routes. The force required to open a door is the sum of the forces to over? come the pressure difference across the door and to overcome the door closer. This can he expressed as 5.20 WA as .7. Fir our?a) (1 1) whore total door-opening force, Ibi- ch force to overcome door closer, do or width, ft A door area, it1 do pressure across door, in. of water distance ?'om doorieoohto edge oflrnoh side of door, This relation assumes that the door-opening force is applied at the knob. Door-opening force FF caused by pressure di?'erencc can 20 I I I CI 0.2 0.3 0.4 13.5 PRESSURE EREN CE. in, of water Fig. 7 Door-Opening Force Caused by Pressure Difference be determined ?'om Figure 7 for a value of d' 3 in. The force to overcome the door closer is usually greater than 3 lb,- and, in some- cascs, can be as great as 20 lbr. For a door that is 7 it high and 3 ft wide and subject to a pressure difference of 0.30 in. of water, the total door-opening force is 30 lbr, if the force to overcome the door closer is 12 1b,. Flow Areas In designing smoke control systems, air?ow paths must be idon?' ti?ed and evaluated. Some leakage paths are obvious, such as cracks around closed doors, open doors, elevator doors, windows, and air transfer grilles. Construction cracks in building walls are less obvi: one, but they are equally important. The ?ow area of most large openings, such as open windows, can be calculated easily. However, ?ow areas of cracks are more dif?cult to evaluate. The area of these leakage paths depends on such features as worlonanship, do or and weatherstrippio g. A 3 by 7 ft door with an average crack width of lid in. has a leakage area of till it}. How- ever, if this door is installed with a BM in. undercut, the leakage area is 0.36 Hz, a signi?cant difference. The leakage area of elevator doors is in the range of (155 to [1.10 ft? per door. For open stairwell doorways, Cresci {1913) found complex flow patients; the resultio ?ow through open do ontays was considerably below that calculated using the doorway's geometric area as the ?ow area in Equation (8). Based on this research, it is recommended that the design ?ow area of an open stairwell doorway be half the geomet- ric area (door height width] of the doorway. An alternative for open stainvell doorways is to use the geometric area as the ?ow area and use a reduced [low on e?icient. Because it does not allow the direetuse -'of Equation this approach is not used here. Typical leakage areas for walls, and ?oors-of commercial build- ing'saro-tabulated as'orea ratios in Table 1. These data-arc based on a relatively small number of tests performed by the National Research Council of Canada (Show etal. l993; Tamara and Shaw- l9'i6a, I976b, 1978; Tamura and Wilson 1966]. Actual leakage areas depend primarily on workmanship rather than on construction mate- rials, and in some cases, the ?ow areas in particular buildings may. vary ?-om the values listed. Data concerning air leakage through building components are also provided in Chapter 27 of the 20(15 ASHRAE Handbook?Fundamentals. Because a vent surface is usually covered by a louver and screen. a vent?s flow area is less than its area (vent height 3-: Width]. Calculation Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent To: Subject: Probst. Paul E. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) Wednesdayi June 13, 2012 3:12 PM Bowl. - en L. {coorocooreFm FW: Vivarium Egress From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, June 2012 1:09 PM To: Jue, Bruc Subject: FW: DCJOCOOIBFO) ivarium Egress .. .. IDil3'i 42 US C- L3 . 2.5.23ihi Jeff W. may be calling you regarding this matter. Thanks, From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM Tcg: Williams *effery 42 053 . Nahum Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. i have attached both the commissioning agents report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 [bf and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 Ibf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 12.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 Hot. Since the project modi?ed air ?ow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. F'aul Probst Attachments: 1. Cx Report 2. NFPA 101 ?2000 3. ASHRAE Formula CDC NFPA 101 - ashrae formula.de C: 2300.de IIJ ME }:42 EBEalh: For ease of reference, this is what the C): report states: ?The Commissioning (Ox) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPAJ 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 151bs- The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushfpull the door inwardfoutward before turning the handle and opening the door.? Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: mite-a2 - 3523'?- Subject: Iyarium Egress Thanks, Paul Probst 262310} From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, June 2012 1:09 PM Que, Subject: FW: iyarium Egress Jeff W. may be calling you regarding this matter Thanks, Paul Probst From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCDDIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 20,. 2011 8:18 AM To: Willi 'effery [byI3;-12 3 . . 252mb} nine Vivarium Egress Jeff; This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lbf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 12.1.4.5, Exception No.1 indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lbi. Since the project modi?ed air flow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. Cx Report 2. NFPA 101 - 2000 3. ASHRAE Formula 1- I I a - CDC NFPA 101 - ashrae formula.de CI: 21300.de Haiti's-l For ease of reference, this is what the 0): report states: ?The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply tan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushi'pull the door inwardfoutward before turning the handle and opening the door." Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEPI From: Browning, Daniel A. (CDCIOCOOIOSEPJ Sent: Tuesday, August 2012 1:43 PM [mm 42' Mattjhester 2523i?? Violent: Vivarium Air Flow Reversal January 201 1 From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 9:48 PM IMMEIQE grow inn Daniel A. Henderson, Joseph (CDCJOCODIOSEP) 262mm Subject: Vivarium Air Flow Reversal - January 2011 Fw: Door Sensor Fw: Vivarium Fw: Vivarium Re: Vivarium Re: Vivarium Re: Vivarium RE: Vivarium Eazam; RE:.Vivarium - Damper FW: Ferrets in Fw: Vivarium Ferrets in Vivarium Egress Installation I. .. Vivarium Vivarium ET I 7 j- RE: Vivarium Vivarium Re: Vivarium RE: Vivarium Re: Vivarium .r Re: Vivarium mgr-3 42 us a ..2i32ailii .. uni-is 42 us of; ISuite on RE: Vivarium RE: automatic door Re: Vivarium 262mm . -- - - RE: automatic door RE: automatic door RE: automatic door automatic door in Vivarium RE Vivarium Re: Vivarium in in Vivarium. .. in Vivarium . Re: JCI As Builts RE: Vivarium RE: Vivarium Vivarium Wall "varium cleaning cleaning Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Browning. Daniel A. Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 1:28 PM To: Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Subject: FW: "Puff of Air" - February 2012 From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, August [11, 2012 9:11 PM To: Browning, Daniel A. Henderson, Joseph Subject: "Puff of Air" - February 2012 . FW: Vivarium door RE: Select Agent Fw: Select Agent Re: air flow RE: air flow Re: airflow RE: air flow adjustments question question Fw: airflow Fw: air Flow RE: Air ?ow Issues Re: Air Flow Issues RE: Air flow Issues RE: Air ?ow Issues RE: Air flowlssues L. in in Iu'ivariu. .. in Vivariu. . . in Ilibrariu. .. in 'Ilivariu .. Eli-r- RE: Air flow Issues RE: Air flow Issues Air flow Issues in in in lifi'rariurn Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Browning: Daniel A. (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Sent: Tuesday, August 2012 1:44 PM To: Mat mt heeter Subject: FW: Vivarium Air Flow Reversal 2010. 2nd From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 9:32 PM To: Brew Daniel A. Henderson. Joseph Subjectl Ivarium Air Flow Reversal 2010, 2nd i'T; FW: VFD and RE: F2009453 Slab RE: P2009453 Slab RE: P2009453 Slab P2009453 Slab RE: VFD and RE: VFD and Schedule Testing Testing Testing Testing Schedule Meeting. . .Schedule Fw: and RE: VFD and RE: VFD and FW: VFD and RE: VFD and RE: VFD and FW: VFD and Schedule Meeting. . .Schedule Meeting. ..Schedule Meeting. ..Schedule Meeting. . .Schedule Meeting. . .Schedule Meeting. . .Scl'iedule RE: VFD and Re: VFD and RE: VFD and RE: VFD'and RE: VFD and RE: VFD and Fw: VFD and Schedule Meeting. . .Schedule Meeting. ..Schedule Meeting? .Schedule Meeting. .Schedule Meeting. . .Schedule Meeting. . .Schedule RE: VFD and RE: VFD and RE: VFD and RE: VFD and RE: VFD and RE: VFD and FW: VFD and Schedule Meeting. . .Schedule Meeting? .Schedule Meeting. .Schedule Meeting. . .Schedule Meeting. .Schedule Meeting. . .Scl'iedule .. .2- VFD and RE: VFD and RE: VFD and RE: VFD and REI [314:2 Vivarium FW:Viverium wiva?um Const. Schedule Meeting. .Schedule Censt. Schedu. .. Cons . chedu. .. Schedule Re: VFD and RE: VFD and and RE: VFD and RE: VFD and VFD and Schedule RE: P2009453 Schedule Meeting. .Schedule Meeting. . .Schedule Meeting. . .Schedule Meeting? .Schedule Meeting and Schedule Meeting revie. .. .s P2009453 if: P2009453 Revised Re: P2009453 Construction . .. Conetruction Sch. P2009453 Central: P2009453 P2009453 Add FW: Vivarium scape to Fans. .. VFD's to project P200945. RE: P2009453 P2009453 .. Construction Construction 11. FW: P2009453 .. Procurement and.. Fw: Vivarium Fw: Vivarium . project project El? FW: P2009453 - FW: P2009453 Add RE: llfwerium Re: 'ifiuerium FW: Re: lifiirerium Fw: Ir'ivarium Fen Failure Tes. .. ir'FD's to project project project project project P200945. .. Hiverium project RE: P2009453 RE: P2009453 Fw: P2009453 RE: P2009453 sche. .. Procurement Procurement Procurement encl.. . Procurement Procurement Procurement I 'a a El" :4 a Re: P2009453 RE: P2009453 FW: P2009453 RE: P2009453 RE: P2009453 FW: P2009453 FW: P2009453 RE: P2009453 P2009453 Procurement and? . Procurement and. .. Procurement and.. . Procurement and. .. Procurement encl. .. Procurement and. .. Procurement 1.09.?Bzalh 1? RE [3?42 ?verium?"' Vivarium RE: P2009453 - Fan FW: P2009453 - Re: P2009453 - Fen P2009453 - Fan Project Project's Failure Tes. . . Fen Failure Tes. .. Failure Tee. . . Failure Test FARE: P2009453 - FenRe?. P2009453 - 92009453 - FanRe: P2009453 - P2009953 - Fen P- Pennant? -- 959? Failure Failure Tes. .. Failure Tes. .. Failure Tes. .. Failure Tes. .. -- .. .. k_ x-Ivi@3550 ?dan II: 11cm Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Browning, Daniel A, (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Sent: Tuesday, August 2012 1:28 PM To: Mattie, Chester( A Subject: FW: Doors in the W142 U30 Wt": Not Compliant with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Fire Code 2 of 2 From: Browning, Daniel A. (CDCIOCOOJOSEP) Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:17 PM To: Rogers, Barbara A. (CDCIODIDADP) Cc: Henderson, Joseph Browning, Daniei A. LLB C: 252mm Subject: FW: Doors in the Not Compiia nt with Nationai Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Fire Code 2 of 2 Barbara, The attached ?les contain some drawings that were already sent with the original ?les, so they should be OK. Dan From: Raymond, George (CDCIDCDOJBFOJ Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:46 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Browning, Daniel A. Cc: Josep Raymond George CDCIOCDDIBFU) IbiiEl?-l? US (3 ?2E2aihf Subject: Doors in the lot Compliant with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Fire Code 2 of a i' i . F-w-i- RE: RE: iyariurr: REt'u'iyarium Earess"rssaes""t;. ""Leyei Exhaust Level Exhaust Level Exhaust .. Egress Egress Egress i'tJii'3L42 it: i633?; File-a - Animal coc RE: 313 Fw: PW: saggy." .. . Suite on SSE HC. Egress Safety List See is Rs! Lugs, Re: IZEI as: has?, as: RE: LEI RE: RE: Egr-. Egress Issues 5a:ety Lis: Safety List Sa ety List Safety List Safety List Safety List Safety Lis: Egress Issues Safety List George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facfiifias Maintenance and Engineering O?ice Centersfar Disease Contra! and Prevention 1600 (31:3?an Road, NW, MS: 13-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 O?ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 4045912599 5 13km? camider z?be pn'nzz'rg Ebb swag? Mathe, Chester From: Browning, Daniel A. (CDCIOCOOIOSEPI Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 1:43 PM To: Met heater (CDCIOCOOIOSEPJ Subject: FW: Vivarium Air Flow Reversal - 2010 October 252m: From: Proust, Paul E. (coqocoO/BFO) Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 9:42 PM To: Brownin, Daniel A. Henderson, Joseph goal-gig? Vivarium Air Flow Reversal 2010 October .. "h rousavz uses a - - 252mm ?sessile? Ram" is; E: RE: P2009453 RE: P21309453 RE: P2039453 Const. Vivarium Proje. .. Vivarium Froje. .. Vivarium Proje. .. Meeting to discus. . . Meeting to discus. . . Meeting 2Df2alhP2089453 REE/warmm RE:Jvariurn - - RE: Vlvarlum Vlvarrum 252a?? - . . Const. SEE-ladImam use 5 I -. 252mm - 553 Dirty Corride FW: RE: "334 Vivarium BIB Vivarium RE U5 De-Con Vivarium-"Shutd. .. Schedule Vivarium Shutd. .. Schedule Vivarium Shutd Schedule 'eI2a2am} . Vivarium Vivarium Shutd. .. nous _42 us U. 262301} [bll_3!242 US LI - 2523.31: i [ova-:42 uses 2623I'hj- Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Joe, Bruce R. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) I Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:09 AM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO ?Wiington, Darryl (CDCIOCOOIBFO): Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ: Howard, William (Bill) Bowen, en L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Garner, Ron Raymond, George Powell. Steven L. (CD a a Williams. Jeffery 25'2aili- lent: .. .. Egress 55ues Proposed 7f24 Testing) ?ll :22 ante: . Doo test script Y??l 2. All See below and provide feedback to the highlighted: 1. have coordinated corrective action (installing new panel hardware, changing out ?eld modules, and new hardware programming) for the FACP for this Saturday 7721 No CDC announcement has been sentyet 2. At the end we want to test with?a fire alarm to verifyihat stair pressurization starts as originally designed. Eilt.ls?hi?s?5?ier?z?e vs 3. suggest sending out one standard generip CDC annfouncgment for FA testing that includes 2721 {8:00am- 2:00pm} and 7f24 Does everyonechqu If so, I?ll send it out today. a. Darryl has yet to receive our order for addition_a_l_f_new door pressure scales. If they do not arrive before we can always delayfreschedule this testing. illhoughtsi?; 5. From the attached matrilt, weEgreed to test #2 and #5 for the 5 doors listed plus an additional 3 doors. 'Paulg Can you get these door numbers?sand add you may_h_a_veto_forward_PagyoLu? sweetest since .tbe.-.P.Dfi E. To recap our meeting from Tuesday concerning testing, Ken and I will initiate the help of ET?sl the FA, stair pressurization, and sequengs; Darryl and Ken will test doors; and and Bill will observe and record data. CoEr?g?ts/Qg all-stilliagrgej 7. Concerning any doors that do not pass, ifthe failure is by 1-5 lbs. {for example: a reading of up to 35le force}, the AHJ [Jeff] has verbally agreed to granting a temporary variance until corrective actions can be taken. 1 will have to send him an official CDC variance request that morning. If a door fails by more than 5 lbs., {immediate corrective action will be needed by adding powered door assistance, installed by FSE work order. mattresses: "stiles-e Bruce From: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 5:23 PM To; Jue, Bruce R. CDC Probst, Paul E. Walpole, Kenneth K. act: Fm?gress Issues 35330? .. FYI From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 04:56 PM To: Chandler, George Browning, Daniel A. Meechan, Paul J. Henderson Jose Raymond, George Bowen, Ken L. 3355313? . lEgress Issues rh?3.42 EBEEHL ?it Door test script All, I have reviewed the information provided below and sustain the existing finding that the doors referenced below are not in compliance with NFPA 101 Life Safety Code section 12.1.4.5 under extreme egress scenario based on calculations performed from pressure differentials recorded during commissioning. The commissioning report dated March 2010 does statedz, r?Upon duo! supply shut down. egress from the Vivarium was deemed unacceptable by The Commissioning {Cx} Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during suppiy fan faiiure does not meet the "Nationai Fire Protection Agency the Safety Handbook. The maximum aiiowabie force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differentiai pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the aiiowabie force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the reiease of the eiectronic security iatch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to push/poi! the door in ward/outward before turning the handie and opening the door. The commissioning report does not acknowledge the code-recognized steps required to open the door and the code required maximum allowable force for each step. The 15 maximum that is referenCEd in the commissioning report should only be applied to the maximum force required to release (open) the latch (Door Motion not the force required to open the door from a closed position. The code requires a maximum allowable force of 30 to set the door in motion from a sealed position to an open position {Door Motion and 15 to open the door to the minimum required width (Door Motion 3). Per the calculations provided in the commissioning report, each door tested meets or exceeds the code required 15 maximum to release the latch (Door Motion However, three ofthe ?ve doors tested do not meet the 30 maximum allowable force to set the door in motion (Door Motion 2] during the most extreme conditionimulti'ple equipment failure egress scenario. This is a violation of NFPA 1021 section 7.2.1.4.5, and the data is derived from door ~opening force calculations based on the differential presswes recorded during commissioning. EXCeption No. 1 of this section of the code states the following: "The openingforcefor existing doors in existing buiidings shaii not exceed a 50 {222 appiied to the iatch stiie?. Per review and interpretation ofthe AHJ, this exception does not apply in this case since the building was not considered an l'existing building? when it was built in 2005 per NFPA 101-1997. The maximum (222 N) operating requirement of earlier editions (pm-1988) ofthe Code remains applicable only to existing doors. The following corrective actions will be performed as soon as the program schedule can accommodate entry into this area for testing and adjustments: 1. Adjust the door closure force on affected doors to under 5 and perform empirical test of doors under testing scenarios identified in the attachment to determine actual compliance with applicable safety codes. Ensure that biological containment is maintained and that the doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 2. If necessary, install new door closers that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to ensure that biological containment is maintained and to allow the doors to meet code. Perform empirical test of doors to ensure biological containment is maintained and that the actual performance ofthe doors meet Life Safety Code requirements. 3. If necessary, install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door and ensure these doors will meet biological containment parameters and be in compliance with Life Safety Code requirements during the highly unlikely but certainly possible event ofa multiple equipment failure egress scenario. Perform empirical tests to ensure actual performance meets Life Safety Code Requirements. Please note that BFO and DSHE will be conducting actual door tests and will either confirm a violation or indicate that we are not in violation at all. At present we are taking a conservative approach since both sets of calculated data suggest a violation under extreme failurefegress conditions. Jeff Williams Deputy Director AHJ From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 20l2 4:00 PM To: Chandler Geore Williams, JeFtEry Bowen, Ken L. Egress Issues George, A stated earlier today FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors in building ivarium. Paul sent an email to Jeff Williams on 1l20l2011 asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response, we (FMEO) vievred the letter of the code was applicable. The Commissioning report stated: ?the force required to open doors during supply tan failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 10? Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means at egress is t5lbt The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount As Paul stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.3.9.1 it states; ?Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure difference across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprin klered buildings or..t in water column in nonsprin klered buildings, and shall be capable of main taining the pressure di?ference under likely conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure dih?erence across doors shall exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by a force of 30lbf in accordance with 22.1.4.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.1.4.5 it states; ?The forces required to fully open anyr door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed ISlbf to release the latch, sorbf to set the door in motion, and 15lbf to open the door to the minimum Ib?3:d2 2623m- required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door with out ciosure shoii not exceed Slbf. These forces shoii be applied to the latch stiie.? "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing buiio'ing sholi not exceed 50ibf applied to the iotch stile? Translations, it takes 15lbf to engage the latch on the door, 301bf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 1298/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: 42 U5 ?2523In Based on this our worst door is Bibs over code. We will perform extensive test in this are the second week in July 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception ofthe code, 50ibs, the doors are in compliance. 0 No action required 2. if the Existir exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure. co - I Adjust the door clo5ure force on these doors to under I Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. 0 install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. (by the way he doesn?t reference the section of the code) then to mitigate the problem we have the following options: I On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. 0 install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. 4 I Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. Message: FW: lb} GHQ r3 Vivarium Egress Message: FW: 2-022; Vivarium Egress George K. Raymond .98qu Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O?-Ece Centers for Disease Control and 1606' Clifton Road, N.W., MS: P104 Aimee, GA 30333 O?iee: 454.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 4051.5912599 a Phase wander ii?e examiners?: ibis e-?ieff C1 262mb:- LIE Ci 3 ZEEalli?. 42 USA: 5; 252all1 US (3 2523Ih] Ib'[3. 42 5: 2523Nu 262.3ll'l': . El EBB E55 Tm? ITest Mm FORCETEST States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST STAI HWELL FANS 15:. BS BULBS 15LBS Normal] Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan Failure IAHU Sal'ew Interlock] Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Du ct detector Trouble FF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Ala rm ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm MIN ON Pu Il stations Alarm ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLU DES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN Test atrix DOOR FORCE TEST States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST emu HWELL FANS 15LBS 3oLos 15 LBS Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan Fallure IAHU Safety Interlock} Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Ala rm withAI-IU Shutdown Alarm FF IN ON Pu II stations Ala rm ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EKCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL I iTest Matrix DOOR FORCETEST States Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST STAIRWELL FANS 15!.55 BULBS 15LBS Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan Failure Safety Interlock} Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble FF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm FF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF ote: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. .. Test atrix FORCE TEST and :5 Fire alarm AHU EXHAUST STAIFIWELL FANS 15Las SULBS 15LBS Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dual Fan Failure Safetir Interlock} Normal OFF MIN OFF AH Duct detector Trouble FF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Ala rm FF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON OFF otc: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN Test Matrix noon FORCE TET States ?re alarm AHU 15LBS BULBS 15LBS Normal Normal ON ON OFF AHU dualFan Failure (AHU Safewlnterlock} Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF Gen eral Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON Gen eral Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm FF MIN ON Pu stations Alarm ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXELUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. Ibn3142 262a-h; Ibn3142 Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCDOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Friday,Julv13, 2012 2:33 PM To: Milby, Stephen C. Lawson, Robert Cc: Wh - ti . . Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFCI) itchieot: HEW Level Exhaust Fans&Safe Egress (2005 Commissioning) Attachments: AIL FPT Support Data. pdf; Vivarium Egress pep.doc Ib?bi See attached will call to explain the PDF. Thanks, Paul Probst From: Milby, Stephen C. Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 12:09 PM . To: Lawson, Robert Probst, Paul E. (CDCIDCODIBFO Cc: Whatley, Marcus E. Raymond, George Wed: RE: Level Exhaust Fans&Safe Egress (2005 Commissioning) To all, Attached are some suggestions for revisions to the narrative. We would welcome corrections or suggestions from and George as well. Thanks, Steve rbh3142 26230u From: Lawson, Robert Sent: Thursday, July,r 12, 2012 4:44 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOXBFO) Fae: Whatiey, Marcus E. (CDCIDCODIBFO) uhject: Level Exhaust FanthSafe Egress (2005 Commissioning) Importance: High Paul: Attached is my ?rst draft of the memorandum with attachments. Please review the documents and edit the word document to provide clarity. Thanks, Bob Lawson, Architect DID Project Manager Capital Improvements Management O?ice US. Centers For Disease Control 8. Prevention This email and anyr attachments contain US. Government sensmve BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) requiring special handling safeguards to protect against unauthorized disclosure. All intormation is considered pertinent to the national interests of the US. Government and is intended soler for the addressee. Please visit BFO Cuelomer ??isfagtign gurve! and tell us about your reoent experiences with BFD. g- Mn. move. we . -. . e2ar - . - I .. .. Mechanlcal W?jn Last Updatedrf'I-S-OS .. COMMISSIONING ACTION ITEM LIST 5 - Dieto ue' . ?3 stem CA I Contractor Dates item a 2 Unit Tag Floor :ype .. . . DATE: Observation - De?ciency - Comment DATE. Entity: Response - Action Taken - Resolution Contracto CA Retest .- . I .. I I I "h rite-rt; incorrect SP set point. BAS shows 3i1?i't'05 JGI: 1000-5 minute trends coda-"willtrgE 5: Exhaust and RAF report shows set point to be 3.0" BSA entered correct set continue monitoring. requested that GBA not change set oerrerzoos QHIZDDS 252mm point on 3-16-?5. but default value needs set to 3.0" point if a change is noticed thin roll? :1 zoaathjz- - -- actually Uni-154]. Both 591 JCI BAS text and graphic show valve as Change wording to 150. cornmeal magnum; 10"?2505 FF Flo Ian Ell-2 nly on the floor plan graphic. temperature for rooni . . it} 3342 2523'? 592 JCI viverium r: ?ic an .r re reversed. The pop-up windows show the correct temp Complete oerasraoos distance 9 forrhe correct room. Floor Ian on the ?oor plan graphic. temperature [or roonl .. I . lb). 3i-42 use. g. 252mm sea .tct Vivarium :11: on are reversed. The pup?Up windows show the correct temp Complete erzerzoos cemeteries 5' for the correct room. In] Floor la" a 3-2 - Only on the ?oor plan graphic. temperature for reddish i 594 JCI Vivarium [a in on are reversed. The pop-up windows show the cones emp Complete erzsraoos oerzsraoos 1m4r2005 I for the correct roomthe floor plan graphic. temperature for room _r .. .. .. .. .. for. 5. 252m. see vivor'rum or: an: anre reversed. The pop-up windows showthe oorreot temp Complete erzerzoos usesrzoos tor-trades rolls-.42 uses 52am; 9 for cum-'5' mum- . 595 ml Graphic 1&5: nHu needsto toe labeled -_fLetr camplete nmg?m? g?mgs 3-24-05: Demper1 stays open on a system disable. All dampers so? .tct oomroie should close. Apply to mm fan pairs. Complete erasraoos oeresraoos; smzoos 6-24?05: Vericones were found at 50% with both fans A at 595 JCI twp? controis operating. When Raf set up the AHU the cones are to operate at i'ti'tt 8-24-05; JCI set cones to Tittle during duel fan operation. Ei2432005 use. 2523m? 8-24-05: On a system disable. both veri'cones shoutd go to 0% open. Only fan A is going closed. Fen remains at open. .101 599 JCI controls redownloaded DX at AHU and system worked once or twice. Later in Complete Bi29r'2t105 DBIZQIZDDE Qt?7i2005 the day after more failures due to testing. the cones did not work again. stayed open at rose. 3-24-05: On a tan tailure to the AHU. A or or both fans. the POP . . . sod JCI controls on is being initiated. tr a single rerr reiture occurs. the other tori 312M005 Th? '5 sequence ?was!? ?f the oerzerzoos should remain on. Once FOP OFF is initiatedI 'ooth fans de-energize. Note: All closed items are hidden. Page 51 of 54 IbhEkecu J. . Udell . . . . . . - Roybal Campusl tMechanrcal \em?m Last Updatecm't-3v-05 COMMISSIONING ACTION ITEM LIST 5 5 Dialogue Completion Dates "em g- UnitTag Hoar Eggs: CA Contractor I: . . . . 3 DATE: Observation - De?ciency - Comment DATE. Entity: Response -Action Taken - Resolution Contracto CA Retest c. season- 8-24?05: On a tan tailure to the AHU. A or or both fans. the FOP OFF is being initiated. li a single fan failure occurs the ether ten JCI comm-'15 should remain on. Once FDP UFFIU - ated. both fans de-energize. cnmpIeta '35 gamma FOP sequence was removed from 13-24435: When both fans are failed to the AHU. the EF's did not go to 3-24-D5: JCI tound a loose wire in control cabinet looking out 601 ml egress. All alarms were present at AHU screen and EF screen. a relay. Problem titted. Brz?zm? B?4mm5 8?24-05: When both tans are failed to the AHLI. the alarm reset should not bring the AHU back on. (only on a single fan failure) With 602 "5'13 a dual failure the system should be Disabled. then Enabled to bring Emma's 3?29?2005 owg?zm? 9?7?2?3'05 system back up on normal start up. 8-24-05: When an EF is in safe egress. make the background blink 603 JCI Graphic red Indicating a problem. Currently some backgrounds are green1 Complete DBEQFEGO5 snraoos some are red and some remain white. are: Marcellus pulled the supply line off the actuator and plugged the end. Dverrode EFT manually to 201:. EFT 2 Position $113351 a??gramna': again; and iniine analog gauge showed that air was bing lost. EPT em Bypass 9. 96' . kept cycling to make op lo'st air. Suggest running test poly! oerairzoos 1orsr2oos failure of the other one we can not maintain SP set point. It dampers . - damper maacme? from actuator to EPT that #2 stairway. Pilot positioner am ma pus I mounting was loose. tightened (update will be provided at? Sam em Joy to do today 3-24-05: On a single ian failure to an EF pair. we need to be able to reset the failed tan with out disabling the system. Add the reset 505 JCI controls button 1e and graphic. The reset notwom if bum fans are Complete 03l29i20l35 antenna in alarm. 8-24-05: When the controller power Was failed to the AHU. the BUB controls do not recognize the AHU egress mode. All Complete BFZQIZDDS emzoos EF continued to maintain SP set point. an? JCI controls 8-2935: On a communicationshfailure lo the N2 bus. the AHU did not Gamma?: mamzm? gnamms receive a comm. alarm. 9-?435. Same as 549.2 3-24.05: On an EF controller power failure. the AHU stayed EDS JCI controls energized and went to egress mode. At the AHU page there Complete Eir29l'2l1?5 OBEQIZUDE amzoos was no indication that the EF's were in sale egress. 3-2-1415: When the XT bue was pulled from the EF's the AHU shut d' . 5'09 JG. camels down like it shouldegress mode Once Complele manor-15 GEEQEUM animus EF's go to egress. the indication at the AHU page should show EF's in egress. Note: All closed items are hidden. Page 52 of 54 an.) Task Test Parameter Ac?on Verification Functional BAS Graphics initial Test Rte-Test Initial Test lie-Test Pass Fail ACTION ITEM l: Pass Fail HEM it 2 cont. AHU Restart after failure cont- Re-energize sopply fan- ciose disconnect Fan Acknowlegge alarmi alarm clears Fan 8 is indexed ON Gravity backdrait dampers open on fan D. has: Inlet cone on Fan returns from closed to two-fan operating postion. Inlet cone on Fan A returns from open to two-fan operating postion. >4 Fan A decreases speed to maintain setpoint - static setpoint is adequately maintained during ramp. Exhaust systems continue to operate in normal operation mode Exhaust systems are stable Supply air system stabilizes. :12 .I U.E .Ci BAS indicates AHU failure. alarms (D AHU is indexer-l OFF Failure .0 ?2I32ai ii . See note #1 system controller recognizes AHU failure and begins to operate in safe egress mode. Graphics indicate safe egress mode of operation due to AHU off. 501 3K 601 . . system controller recognizes AHU failure and begins to operate in safe egress mode. Graphics indicate safe egress mode of operation due to AHU off. 601 601 Isystem controller recognizes AHU failure and begins to operate in safe egress mode. Graphics indicate safe egress mode of operation due to AHU off. 501 601 ibis-L42 us ?2E2aih1~ AHU Restart Failure Acknowledge alarm:i alarm clears System continue to operate per safe egress modes. 602 602 R?l?h?rgii? AHU Toggle-interlock to disabler?enable. (3) Exhaust systems and AHU follow normal system start-up. Exhaust systems are stable Supply air system is stable. LEI-PUFF 5252 lg I?ll a - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. elasue verltied-resel-ued-hy commissioning-agent; [bi-Ij3i-1-i2 use 5 252mm REVS:fost Page 6 of 13 Functionalwm? HAS Graphics Task Test Parameter Action Verification I Initial T?gt' T3511. Pass Fail m: Pass Fail Safe Egress Operation-AHU OFT: a 8A8 indicates AHU failure. alarms it PX bl continues to operate it -- -- - Create AHU failure to tie-energizes 1 Safe Egress initiate Safe Egress Two-position bypass damper remains Mode Operation damper'opens 100% [mm 5.0. searing I - system indicates operating mode of safe - egress-AHU failure I a RAE indi ates AHU failure. alarms 5.0. 252301continues to operate mm? - -- Create AHU failure to de?energizes 2 Safe Egress initiateSafe Egress Two-position bypass damper remains or?t. Mode Operation Modulation bypass damper opens 100% .. . We". indicates operating mode a, safe egress?AHU failure . . a BAS indicates AHU failure. alarms Hi" .. - continues to operate . I Iii-safe initiate Safe Egress Modulating bypass damper opens 100% ?3?42 . .. Isystem indicates operating mode of safe X- egress-AHU failure. a AHU de?energizes prior to exhaust systems stem . . enterin safe egress operation. 4 Chargcteristics SyStem Charamensm AHU static pressure declines prior to exhaust systems static pressure. Safe Egress . - . d2 - system status Failure alarm initiate-5. [39- 1:333:42 I . energizes AHU. E-dF-ess Cre?f?aEf?ie ?3 AHU shuts down prior to other exhaust systems Mode 0 t. 9 going into safe egress mode._ para "m 'ndicates operating mode of safe egress- 0 -- - failur . ?int?" ~a""'""BA3"'indicates Failure. alarms 'Wm 52.52.39?. . Commas *0 Operate .Greatel Manure to ole-energizes 2 Safe Egress initiate Safe Egress Two-position bypass damper remains open. Mode Operation He_ Modulating bypass damper opens 100% hm,? mm Exhaust 5 stem indicates operating mode of safe '?ilsm?SE-E2523?? f1 Egress: fai'ure - - issue said to be resolved by contractor. LIE-C- 252th - Issue Veri?E'd resolved by commissioning agent. REVSJI Fs Page of 18 Public-Health Service W?mm? -. e? Centers for De ease Control i ?ream Memorandum Us. 60W SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED {setn INFORMATION Date: [2 JulyZUlZ DRAFT T9: Marcus Whatlev, Supervisor Emmi Bob Architect, CDCIOCOOIBFOFCIMO use . zesam Subje?h .. - -- iLevel, Exhaust Fans 3.: Safe Egress (2005 Pages: Three 2 _l . tense-42 uses eel .. Iv1vanun 2533'?? 3 and ancillary spaces. Thi' urnmarv of records__r_elated to the 'Dtl'3'f4? and commissioninaofitlte--v-ivariu '1 I I - 'Lb?i'i :12 'J'SWwahether atr? ot aces as well as theurelated issue of reouired to open the doors. was in cpr_n intent at the lesion @h?mimw midst-42 use 252mm whit-12 US Cl seems;- [Ell-[3 42 US I: FbElr?ii?e us- 5 252m; commission in 9 process. as a narrative timeline WWTM following infottnatloa?summary of events surrounding these issues. Supporting documents with relevant sections highlighted. are 93(71- n. tL? attachedesestss yo. . fen". . I I In 2001 thgtei?naetod. aiMcCarthvi requested clari?cation from the arehitectx'enginccr on relates to various scenarios that are planned For. That clari?cation before the building opened to nronerlv resolve the outstanding issue ttfailittv For safe egress in: at the facilith ,?equest..for [3-1 The contractor submitted a response (IIFEBZUUSJ: The NE issued a detailed response that gave direction on what should occur under the hypothetical scenario where both tans Qt th_e _s_upplv air handling unit fail resulting ig the intended situation where one fan_om exhagst fan pair set continues to operate to maintain negative air ?ow tans?Fail. Their response included: ?Desired setpoint shall be selected allow building air to be drawn thru and exhausted from the building without ever pressurizing egress of personnel from the affected areas"; . o. (t l-F-EB26051with 3 pages; - . Weekly Commissioning Issues Update Status" (dated Item 1, CI . ivarium EF Bypass Dampers?, by Paul Prohsv?CIlle mechanical engineer: Item 1 (DI us. SIFED (SBU) uence of orations for exhaust fans serving thel: -- Formatted: lndent: Left 0.5" assets; Formatted: Seikethreugh Ibll'B'lI-iE LIEU: U5. GOVERNMENT BUT UNCLASSTFED (SBU) INFORMATION outlines the corrective action taken over several months to address the bypass damper issue. presumably in response to actions resulting from 1FFIBEGU5 direction above: 0 Damper pricing issued Dampers orderedfarrive (I Dampers ready for Cx Dampers installed (1 Issue reopened (I A I NOTE: The issue was reopened in May. but the ea'sfop is not given in the above 0000 . document. on. McCarthy?s RH 1335! (bid-low), it was apparently reopened because the initial ?for! did the anticipath result and another solution had to be developed; 5% ?29ng 0 Attachment: DQJUL2012 2:39 PM Email nonrigat Prendheggast to Paul Prohst with comment hi li hted explaining what the Update refers to, 2 ?5 . Weekly Commissioning Issues Update 5 pages; . Doors and testing proposal: Doors . developed of doors and testing procedures for status pressure tests under an air handling unit failure scenario. This was supplemental worlg to the contract and this allowed the additional work to be priced; 0 Research Air Flo= Inc.3 balance agency, sent an email with attachments (SOMZUUSL in response this Proposal? to do the testing; 0 Attachment: sometimes class [repeater to Jason Roberts, 1 page; with 12A door list, 1 page; and Ali??i _?st'proposal, 3 pages; use . Eshdatist Fan Fair Bypass Damper Issues?. Contractors statements include ?we willipever be able to achieve an egress setpoint during a 3) c: 1m failure of an Al- annther exhaust fan pain apd we suspect the same problem exrst for exhaust fanpaili - statement ?never be able to achieve? likely means they could not achieve it with the that was currently planned, since it was later . achieitiidil?hen the design was changed; is shouldibe'prpvided and the damper should be set to full open; 0 Transmittal to Paul Marting from Angelle Carmion with Ibil3}.42 USE gnaw? a Jase-Classes - mesh; Change 161 revisiOn (23May2005): The NE requests an itemized prop'osalsfrom the edgtractor for a new change related to the exhaust fans= presumably because the earliepxaction did'r'not result in pressurization that allowed code-complaint egress; 315:5:ij l-Eh?gaai-li? USE is reissued with an ?Insufficient Response Notice" - stamp after second bypass damper is installed per NOTE: This is the same as] . received earlier. In addition to the new ?Insuf?cient Response Notice", it has a ?Received 26May2006 stamp and the below reaponse: 0 AE Reaponse (ZdMayZUtlS) by Pedro Pacheco of GUI-12A says to discard his Egg-Issues response-to-RFI He say to follow calIller - I (revision Deleted 23May2005; (1 cmarzoo?) by Pedro Pacheco of coma in part notes a new damper 23May2005 Transmittal to Eddie Harris from Angelle Cannion with LI '3 Cf: z?zallt. 13.5. SENSITIW BUT UNCLAS SIFED ?ml 4: Atta hippo 31Ma3'2005 Transmittal to Jason Roberts from Angella Cannion with RFI saga-In . . . 1-334 ?Insuf?cient Respon3e Notice?, 2 pages; - Action was tal-ren1 presumably by following the CUHQA 26May2005 response, which resulted in safe egress during a dual failure exhaust fan scenario. The documentation is as follows: 0 Fire and Life Safety Commissioning ReportI by GBA, Item 83 I Excel spreadsheet column 4 {issueidescriptionL states in part that negative pressure on this floor should be better balanced with the positive stairwell pressure so that egress door can be opened by exerting code-complaint force. Excel spreadsheet column 5 (action taken) states the work was completed with a date of I NOTE: Column 4 says this refers to the ?low containment? part of the building, which does not include the vivariumr, However, the vivariumjs the area cited in previous documents as havipE'-Irhe pressurization issue, so based on the information available to reviesaV'and absence evidence to the contrary, the reference to ?low containmentili'appears towbc a typographical error; . .. . . easement Reposition 831.1 page . rammed: Highlight handling U?il Fa i161? StartiSf?il ssi?illence?i?ailii?i . Initial testfailed and _,iistestins includes statine th?tii?sileew?? is be as. issue Was verified resolved by. the. commissioningjagent; Ito-tim- - - blocs meanness sesame-sesame . ?Amchm?mi C133. ?Emeli??al Perf?rr?aase Tet-ti enemas seetiasje..6;.of 18: Josi?ii?Systerus =Operatio'n Consideration? _?1e labeled-unsafe Egress. .. use (engined: paragraph, - Parasites-Hesse; - END or passageway?? ?sang?: if Conclusion: ?lgf'h?gk ix." {in 5- N. if)! we?? ?The commissioningagent for discovered as a part of the normal evaluation process a Jana Ii cheeretieal?scenario where the the failure U5 Level. Remedial action was recommended, but it did not initially solve the problem. Further action was taken that solved the problem. (It was likely resolved as noted in the ?Fire and Life Safety Commissioning Repo em 88 (2211111005), assuming the ?low containmen also appli__e_d_to the vivariunt spaces in the Block -- . .. . . viva?um exhaust was resolved by August, 2005, because this is explicitly noted by GBA in their AUGDS Functional Performance Test.) nuts: 42 os?: to the shortly before and during commissioning by GBA. It did not investigate the low containment lab building to see if there Was a second issue involving the 26JUL2UUS report, since that was outside the de?ned SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED scope of work for this memo. A150 any changes made after GBA did their testing, on various building I components is not re?ected in the: above Attachments: Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Milby, Stephen C. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 12:09 PM To: Lawson, Robert Pro-bat, Paul E. Cc: Wha i Marcus E. Raymond. George (CDCIOCDOJBFOJ Subject: RE: evel Exhaust FansSSafe Egress (2005 Commissioning] Attachments: .q-?in scm.doc To all, Attached are some suggestions for revisions to the narrative. We would welcome corrections or suggestions from Paul and George as well. The ks, Steve From: Lawson, Robert Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 4:44 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Miibv, Stephen C. Whatley, Marcus E. Subje Level Exhaust Fans&$afe Egress (2005 Commissioning) Importance: High Paul: Attached is my ?rst draft of the memorandum with attachments. Please review the documents and edit the word document to provide clarity. Thanks, Bob Lawson, Architect 010 Project Manager Capital improvements Management (3ch O) U.S. Centers For Disease Control as Prevention This email and an).I attachments contain LLS. Govemm ent SENSITIVE BLIT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION requiring special handling safeguards to protect against unauthorized disclosure. All information is considered pertinent to the national interests of the U.S. Government and is intended solely for the addressee. Please visit EFO Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent emerienoes with BFU. 49", ?unk fa! ?Huh. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SERVICES Public Health Sena-lee Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Memorandum U5. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLAS SIFED (SBU) Date: 12 July EGIZ DRAFT T01 Marcus Whatley. Supervisor Emmi Bob Lawson, Architect, OIBFOICNO It? U-igil?jem IExhaust Fans a. Safe Egress (zoos Commissioning) Pages: ?11" .. .. f? [block contains a v' i lvanurn Uri .3 252: .. IhiiEt :42 US - 262. In; address margins of whether air?ow across doors in thetviv .- - ck? nil-force re urred to 0 en the - sateegress?Eem?the?teeili?rme following - of events surrounding those, last: . . r; . and ancdlary spaces. This Memorandum ha summarv of records related to the This summarv is intend: well as the related issue of summa? is?s/tructured as a narrative timeline . Su ortin documents with relevant sections hiahliai?ited. are HMcCarth?. requested clari?cation from the architectiengineer I I That clari?cation lead thichan?inithevhork before the build ine onened to proneer resolve the outstandin issue to our for safee can from the facilit . I McCarthy Request for IniorEihiion?RI??IJ 1319M (DEFEBZOGS): The contractor submitted a request for clari?cation regarding the sequence of operations for exhaust fans serving thei:i LIE-Z I . Ma response (HFEBZOUS): The N13 issued a detailed response that gave direction on what should occur under the hypothetical scenario where a pair of exhaust fans fail. Their responsa included: ?Desired setpoint shall be selected allow building air to be drawn thru and exhausted from the building without ever pressurizing egress of personnel from the affected areas"; 0 Attachment: Transmittal (l [Fl-332005) with mam, 3 pages; ?Hit? 4: U. While U. 262nm; I ff to. _E Weekly Commissioning Issues Update Status" (dated Item LE 3 5; i varium EF Bypass Dampers", by Paul ProbatiCIMO mechanical engineer: Item 1 outlines the corrective action taken over several months to address the bypass damper issue, I presumably in response to actions resulting from direction above: Damper pricing issued US: SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED (SBUJ HE C. i-l' e. Indent: Left: os- it: HE -142 [3 . l7.? US. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SEED WFURMATION Dampers orderedfatrive (1 Dampers ready for Cx (MAPRZU 05); Dampers installed Issue reopened (l I NOTE: The issue was reopened in May, but the reason is not given in the above document. Based on McCarthy?s RFI (below), it was apparently reopened because the initial ?for? did not achietre the anticipated result and another solution had to be developed; 0 Attachment: 09IUL2012 2:39 PM Email from Pat Prendergast to Paul Frobst with comment highlighted explaining what the Comissiobmg Issues Update refers to, 2 pages; eekly Commissioning 5 pages; - Doors and testing proposal: Doors Listotls" The AXE developed a list doors and testing procedures for status pressure tests under an air handling unit (AHU) failur?e-sscengrio. This was supplemental work to the contract and this allowed the addi?nna{WDrk to be priced; 0 Research Air Flo, the test and balance agency, sent an email with attachments (3 DMAREDUS), in respopsne? to a ?Requels?gLEmanl Attachment: from "ii'?i page; with CUHZA door pagegiapflsiESearEh Air In cost proposal, 3 pages; McCarthy RF I 1334 Pan Pair Bypass Damper Issues". Contractor?s statements include ?we .will ne?nbp-ablegto?aehieve an egress setpoint during a failure of an AHU or another exhaust ftin pair" and??eesstis?peet the some problem will exist for exhaust fan pair Li 50- 552523?? ?Tobe: The stat'Ement ?never be able to achieve? liker means they could not achieve it with the design that was currently planned, since It was later achieved when the design was changed; 0 ME Response (1 6MAY2095) by in part notes a new damper A should be provided and the damper should be set to full open; Transmittal to Matting from Angelle Cannion with RFI 2" 13?s 2 ms I - cur-12a Change ?aptiss 161 revision I (23May2005): The are requests an itemized /\ppoposal from thexcontractor for a new change related to the exhaust fans, presumably,r because the-earlier action did Ii_ot result in pressurization that allowed code-complaint egress; o7\Attachn-ient: 2?May2005 Transmittal to Eddie Harris from Angelle Cannion with _Gb3nge BullietinCB 2 pages; . McCarthy-RE! is reissued . an ?Insufficient Response Notice" stamp a?e?r?specojnd bypass damper is installed per in - 151. NOTE: This is the same RH received earlier. In addition to the new ?Insuf?cient Response Notice?, it has a ?Received stamp and the below response: AXE Response (26May2005) by Pedro Pacheco of says to di his 16May2005 response to RFI 133 (03May20051. He say is follow l-ltil (revision 1) dated 23May2005; 0 Attachment: Transmittal to Jason Roberts from Angelle Cannion with ?Insuf?cient Response Notice", 2 pages; 0000 U. S. GOVERNNIENT BUT UNCLASSIFIED (531.1} - Action was taken, presumany by following the CUT-12A 26Mav2005 response, which resulted in safe egress during a dual failure exhaust fan scenario. The documentation is as follows: 0 Fire and Life Safety Commissioning Report, by GBA, Item 38 (EZIULZUDS): I Excel spreadsheet column 4 (issuefdescription), states in part that negative pressure on this ?oor should be better balanced with the positive stairwell pressure so that egress door can be opened by exerting code-complaint force. - Excel spreadsheet colunm 5 (action taken) states the work was completed with a I date of I NOTE: Column 4 says this refers to the ?low contain. - which does not include the vivariurn. However, the part of the building, ivan'um is the area cited in previous documents as having the pressurization issue, so based on the information available to review and absence evidence to the'contratj', the . A . reference to ?low contatnment? appearstto be a typographical error; I Attachment: ?Fire and Life Safgt??b?ssioning Report", Item 33,, 1 page. George Butler Associates (GBA) ?TFtihctional Rerformance Test" (AUGZGOS), ?Air handling Unit Failure StartIStop s. stresses", Item a (page 6 of 18): - Initial test failed and then - Retesting includes stating thdf?sue was to be resolved by connector and issue was veri?ed resolved by thelco?rnmissioning agent; I NOTE: Even if the 22IUL2005 report wm-hogrefemn to til i x, block, this AUGZOGS document is re?t-litigating bloele ved' rsol y, I Attachment: (335 ?Functional Performance 'l?est?AUGZtl?? see page 6 of 13; . ?Systems Operation Consideration? (in ?le labeled . Safe E31353 ode?agapb, 2 pages; 09IUL2012 2:39 PM Email from Fat Prendergast to fan] pages; END OFEWTIVE SEQUENCE Conclusion: L's-The commissioning.agent..fer-- discovered as a part of the normal evaluation process ""tlaeeret-t-eal-scenano where the faile?giggal exhaust fans could negativer impact safe egress front the ?Elm Remedial agree was recommended, but it did not initially solve the problem. Further action. was taken that solvedtt?lie problem. (It was likely resolved as noted in the ire and Life Safety Commissioning Reps Item 83 (22M2005), assuming the ?low containment"-also applied Ithe Vivarium exhaust was resolved by August, 2005, because this is explicitly noted by GBA in their AUGUS Functional Performance Test.) am; This mg is, only demand-awe a: mock shortly 262mb;- before and-"during commissioning by GBA. It did not investigate the low containment lab building to a see if there was a second issue involving the 263UL2005 report, since that was outside the de?ned - scope of work for this memo. Also any changes made a?er GBA did their testing on various building i components is not re?ected in the above Attachments: [use 11's.: agree-2 - U5. GOVEW SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SHU) IN Maths. Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Lawson, Robert (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Friday, Julth, 2012 11:35 AM To: Raymond. George Cc: Milb Subject: FW: 5? .Level . .45. afe Egress {2005 Commissioning) Attachments: HVA02005Mem0.doc; Level Attachments Importance: High George: After telling Steve Milbv what you said about the memo I am working on, he said to send it to you. It is attached. (Paul Probst is going to look at it todavJ Regards, Bob Lawson, Architect CDCIOCOOIBFOICIMO 770.488.2447 This email contains U.S. Govemment SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) From: Lawson, Robert Sent:'l11ursdav, July 12, 2012 4:44 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Milby, Whatlev, Marcus E. (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Subject: Level Exhaust Fans&Safe Egress (2005 Commissioning) Importance: High ibiiEizdz USE 252arhi Paul: Attached is my first draft ofthe memorandum with attachments. Please review the documents and edit the word document to provide clarity. Thanks, Bob Lawson. Architect Project Manager Capital Improvements Management Of?ce (CIMD) U.5. Centers For Disease Control 8. Prevention 770.438.2447 This email and any attachments contain LLS. Governmenl SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION requiring special handling safeguards to protect against unauthorized disclosure. All information is considered pertinent to the national interests of lhe U5. Govemment and is intended solely for the addressee. Please visit EFG Customer Satisfaction Survey and tell us about your recent experiences wilh BFO. if? $13M:ng Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) a 10-! Ill-nut?? aim Date: To: From: ulna .42 use. 2523.?; Pages: lbs? 14-12 US (I: . . . 262ml]; at? DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Human ssavrcas Memorandum LLS. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SH U) INFORMATION 12 July 2012 DRAFT Marcus Whatley, Supervisor Bob Lawson, Architect, Euhject: - 1, Exhaust Fans a. Safe Egress (2005 Commissioning) liars- 42 us resets ?x I lblock contains a Vivarium and ancillary spaces. Near the! completion of construction and during the commissioning process in 2005, the contractor McCarthyIXrequested clari?cation from the architectfengineer (CUH2A) on pressurization of spaces: as it rpl'a to various scenarios that are planned for. That clari?cation lead to changes in the wettibetbre tlie building opened to properly resolve the outstanding issue and allow for safe egress from the facility. The following information is structured as a narrative timeline of. events surrounding those eveni?s; . -. . - McCarthy Request for Information (RFD 1319 (03131332995): The contact? submued a request US C3 2623M. 0 with RF1131 I I ?Bid Commissioning Issues Update Status? (dated 28IUN2005), Item 1, 2533"" ?2 SE 2623t exhaust fans serving th (IIFEBEOOS): The are issued a detailed response that gave direction on what. should occur under the hypothetical scenario where a pair of exhaust fansji?ailxlheir rehpoinse included: ?Desired setpoint shall be selected allow building air to be diawn exhausted from the building without ever pressurizing egress of personnel {scum/the .a?'ccted?ahg?sg; LI 3 pagesivarium EF Bypai?Ss Dampers?, by Paul Probst/CIMO mechanical engineer: Item 1 outlines the corrective m?onsgken over several months to address the bypass damper issue, presumably in response to actions resulting from direction above: 00000 Damper pricing issued Dampers orderedfarrive Dampers ready for C): Dampers installed Issue reopened I NOTE: The issue was reopened in May, but the reason is not given in the above document. Based on McCarthy?s RFI 1334 (below), it was apparently reopened because the initial did not achieve the anticipated result and another solution had to be developed; US. GOVERNTNIIENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED (SBU) INFORMATION 0 Attachment: DQIULEUIZZ 2:39 PM Email from Pat Prendergast to Paul Probst with bihli ted explaining what the Commissioning Issues Update refers to, 2 pages; if 9 Weekly Commissioning Issues Update Status $232005?, 5 pages; I Doors and testing proposal: 0 CUHZA Doors List.xls? 5): I The NE developed a list of 2623's: doors and testing procedures for status pressure tests under an air handling unit (AI-TU) failure scenario. This was supplemental work to the contract and this alloweEi?the additional work to be priced; 0 Research Air Flo, Inc, the test and balance agency: Sent an email with attachments (3 in response to a ?Request for Proptisali?itoxdo the testing; 0 Attachment: 30MAR2005 email from Kevin ?erth td??as?on Roberts, 1 page; with CUHZA door list, 1 page; and Research Air Flo cdh?Qproposhgi??pages; I McCarthy 1334- Exhaust Fan Pair Bypass Damper Issues?. Contractor?s statements include ?we will never be able to achieve an egiesp setpoint during a failure of an b] 31 4r2 2 1?lgll1?f exhaust fan pair? and ?'we suspect the same probl?eii'?'viill exist for exhaust fan pair 1' 92mm NOTE: The statement ?never be able torachieve? likely means they could not achieve it with the design that was currently planned, since it was later achieved when the design was ehgnged; 0 AE Response (16WY2005):by Pedro Pacheco of CUHZA in part notes a new damper should be provided and ththamp?ersshould be set to full open; Attachment: 17May2005 Ti?aiixsiilittalwipo?aul Matting from Angella Cannion with RFI EIH WK II GUI-12A Chang Bulletin 161 retiision?iflfafBMa?gUg): The requests an itemized proposal from the contractor for a new clia?hge related go'the exhaust fans; presumably because the earlier action did not result in preSSUrization that allowed code-complaint egress; 0 Attachment: 23May2005 Transmittal to Eddie Harris from Angella Cannion with Change BulletirgC'B 2 pagds; I McCarthy RFI 1334 is reissued w'th an ?insufficient Response Notice? bypass damper is installed per CB @5942 61. NOTE: This is the same RFI in addition to the new ?Insuf?cient Response Notice", it has a ?Received 26May2006 stamp and the below response: 0 AJE Response (26May2005) by Pedro Pacheco of CUHZA says to die In; his IoMayZOOSEreis onse to RFI 1334 Eli-5U (03May2005). He say to follow CB 161 I ?(revision 1) dgt'cd 23May2005; Transmittal to Jason Roberts from Angella Cannion with RFI ?1333' [3114? ?Insuf?cient Response Notice"; 2 pages; - Action was takengpifesumably by following the GUI-12A 26May2005 response; which resulted in safe egressdfu?ng a dual failure exhaust fan scenario. The documentation is as follows: 0 Fire and Life Safety Commissioning Report; by GBA, Item 88 (22JUL2005): I I Excel spreadsheet column 4 (issueidescription); states in part that negative pressure on this ?oor should be better balanced with the positive stairwell pressure so that egress door can be opened by exerting code-complaint force. I Excel spreadsheet column 5 (action taken) states the work was completed with a date of US. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT WCLASSIFED (SBU) INFORMATION I NOTE: Column 4 says this refers to the ?low eontairrnent? part of the building, which does not include the vivarium. However, the vi-variu?m isthe are'atlaiilii USE: i cited in previous documents as having the pressurization issue, so based on the information available to review and absence evidence to the contrary, the reference to ?tow containment? appears to be a typographical error; I Attachment: ?Fire and Life Safety Commissioning Report", Item 88, 1 page. George Butler Associates (GBA) ?Functional Performance Test? (AUGZOOS), ?Air handling Unit Failure Start/Stop Sequences?, Item 3d (page 6 of 18): I Initial test failed and then retested; I Retesting includes stating that issue was to be resolved by contractor and issue was veri?ed resolved by the commissioning agent; I NOTE: Even if the ZZIULZOOS report was not refer [page thel -- 7251" 9? i block, this AUG2005 document is to the 5 block. The issue was resolved; . - Attachment: Gas ?Functionaggarfonnange Test? AUmnns arm. page 6 of ?Systems Operation (in labeled Safe Egresslziini Mode paragraph, 2 pages; WWI-3 2 2:3,giPM Email froml we to Paul Probst, 2 pages; in? I END OF NARRATNE SEQUENCE Conclusion: ?[he commissioning agent for discovered as a part omit; normal evaluation process a re the failed of dual exhaust fans could negatively impact safe egress from the -- action was recommended, but it did not initially solve the problem. Further action was problem. (It was likely resolved as noted in the ?Fire and Life Safety 38 (22IUL2005), assuming the ?low containment? statement is a typographical errhr. ?Iii?h?e, event it is not a typographical error, the vivarium exhaust was noted by GBA in their AUGUS Functional resolved by August, Performance Test.) is, ?mimics; ?Li? if?; . NOTE: This memo is only in regafd,,to the exhaust issue in thel lshortly before and during commissioning It did not investigate the low containment lab building to see if there was a second issue invgl'i?i?ng the 26JUL2005 report, since that was outside the de?ned scope of work for this memo. Also any changes made after GBA did their testing on various building components is not re?ected in the above narrative; this includes the statement Attachments: Sage 2863 Sage 255?} IUIMI 3.39:: 26W IUIMI LLE. GDVERMENT SENSITIVE BUT (55ile INFORMATION -- lLawsoE?i. Robert From: Prohst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Monday, lulyGQ, 2012 2:39 PM To: Milhy. Stephen C. Subject: . egress Attachments: - doc, lap..erEV3.xlsx; CDC- Co mm Thanks, Paul Pro From: Pat Sent: Wednesday, June 13. 2012 7:20 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCDUIBFG) Cc: Dan A'hitz; Chad Halter Subject: RE: Safe egress Hey Paul- Attached is all we could come up with. Our report is in storage, and uniormnately, back then we did not do the reports in electronic format. I have a call In to get it from storage, however that usually takes a few days. Notes: 1. we did test that system with a safe egress mode. 2. our testing procedure indicated that we recorded the space pressures, but I don't know Mr isin the report or not. If you have a copyloolt in the same area as that testing procedure in Volumes 2 anti 3. 3. we haye included a proiect record that speci?cally discusses the safe egress and sequence ofoperation for it. 4. we may not have recorded the pressUres clue to the fact that: a. there is no adju?ment to the exhaust fans - so you get what you get with both bypass dampers-open. b. the safe egress was put in as an additional safety measure. The only time it would be initiated-is if BOTH Air handler supply fans failed. That would he a double or two failure scenario which is generally not accounted for in Industry practice. Attached are the testing proced'ureLThe'project record that talks about the sequence. and the indicates 135335.333 CHE associated wjt_hj_t_[i_tem. i the list}. I know that is not much - but hope it helps. Pat Patricia A Prendergast, P. E. I ViroCon, Inc. oorendergast@ghateam.com .333.: direct: 313.342.4307 ext. 212 1 office: 313.342.3225 fax; 313.342.1133 mohi e: Message-nu 1 . US. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED EMF-OH LLB. GOVERMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (saw From: Prahst. Paul E. mailtozgegS?cdc.gav Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:20 PM To: Pat Prendergast Subject: Safe egress Pat: This only applies to the Vivarium area. Thanks, Paul 2 1J.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) INFORMATION U..S. GUVERMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED IN FORMATION Bldg..ld?.ieetrtv Commissioning Issues Update Status srzsiauns Item Issue also Known As Status Action By Dave BIG Last: Update LIE-C ?2?9E?ht - - - - eypass Dampers- EB #1319 Needs'nrioing d_ 'MoCarthv sesame #161'121'153051 manners qu??t?d' install gasses; for C2 #351? . IFfrioing 312005 Dar?riners shipped an - ready to ox?sv 414- men'sn oros arzseoos 2 ear-mas mode-etiong CLOSED 3i15i2004 semen?rename; Need PCO response for CUHZA 51'1 112? 35 (FCC response sentto Mel: on Lit-29:05} Mot: revised and resubmitted 3-30-05 Motif-army 9 $132005 PCO response sent'to I'ch on $54215 22 Ei14i2005 Additional revisions necessary (5:1 ores; (33151. Rev. 1 issued 523195 NTP Rev. 1 issued 51'20i?5 Work to be complete USID3IG5 Work not complete commas 3 Priority.? Restart GBA IL #11 Heads rining McCarthy 3l25l'2l305 Voids (33115150 212304 meeting - JCI noted seeking BIZQIZDUS CE #164 (EMSIEIS) further info from CUHEA 4113412005 POD MDT Mot:th has reprised air-title Revised Scope 3? stamens Revised FCC) submitted to CD L3 3J1 Bide 4U snezoos one provided are snares JCI Proceeding - to be ready for tntg?d Test 4 ESQ-Gaesatienal-Seeuenee assesses Mammal?? CLOSED 3i15!2005 need?twitten-oon?rmatien 9W Restart seq. spreadsheet to by #15 CE #154. Rev. 2 Issued SEEMS 5 Fireman's override Panel RFI Cdnent design under re-evaluation by EREIZIJUS #4Ei1 cur-ran relative to GMP requirements I BEBIZEIOS Issue re?surtaoed 5:13 41'1 SJEUGE Pricing Issued 3i71?05 under evaluation Inst. TBC 5?25 memos Revised Scope snares Revised PCB submitted to CDC SJIEJDS CDC provided NIP 3313305 Dn-anrd Suhmittal Review $30-05 5 HM Control Fan_eb'CommunicatIon Failure FUD #411 Under evaluation with OHS 10 3t25i2005 of 2M 5105 Inst :oomnlete 443?05 NTP Issued 3i15i05 -.to be constructed Inst. TBC 4M5 #132005 JCI Proceeding - need schedule ?nish date QNQC 4:2?t2005 .10! to complete panel fab. bv 4?1-135 U5. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBLI) INFORMATION mun-42 C: ?2623 I1'i US ?262all1f midi-12 US c: ?2623Ihl LI 9 5: 26?.31h: U3. GOVERMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION NTP. issued 4.1505 emcee I Pieces-peeing GLUEED NA seems cemeemnme} inst. TBC M15 119941495 P?eiegeppmsamas Meagan-ewes 1% CLGSEEI Bremen-4 magma} Qiewee?eciicummsme 9 VFDIBypae-e Control HCA Exhaust #39 Need determination of acceptable CLOSED NA cpe?reticn e1 intent and limits He.qu 10 Pee-#499 Submit-EGG CLOSED NA WEieg-pe?e?medwg ?ange-Mm 11 AHU Pie-Heat Coil Contra! Veives 21234105 JCI tel-verify elrcke 1's. veive JCUMcCerthy 75 SIETIZDUE pDEItIc'n. GBA to measure pressure diff. #1219005 SIZSIUE JCI tech on site Waiting on ree pcnee from Tech 12 CLOSED 31319005 wag-te-feHeW 0X10 verify calibration 991M359 CLOSED 318121105 "marmaan 14' WW ?eece-peeing Mane? ail-18413995 Mam EIZEIUS Included in Item #8 CLOSED 15 Cage Wash, Bic-waete?lassweeh Sequence CB #165 Needs pricing NA #512005. Cieri?caticne FCC) #403 Pribing aparcueqaiaf?? Inst. TBG 4M 5 #1312035 NTP Issued 31'131'05 10 be revised - NEG. {33301 . .15! - - ISequence RFI #1325 Need RFI response McCarthy NA Clari?cations CUHBA reegcneed on 3-2905 3112912005 . Need scheduled ccmpieticn date 4H 51201215 12. Pressure Centre] Changes #90 ASI issued - $22105 CLOSED NA SIZTIJEUUE to FCC) #412 ASI Clari?ed 31231135 Met: Submitted PCD pricing on 3.2.9414 41"51?2055 Nc cost change engraved #5595 1E.- HC -- Deer ASI #91 ASI leeued - 3:22:05 McCarthy gramme Fee #413 A31 Clari?ed 3:23:05 enemas Mac submitted FED pricing on 3-29-04 4i5!2005 $1.156?? meet 4151135 4:15 4113:2005 U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SELI) INFORMATION LLS. BUT UNCLASSIFIED (BED) IN FORMATJUN 19 Hi: 15?: Floor Exhaust Fans ASI #92 Issued - 3i22i'05 McCarthy '12 3i2?i'i2005 Fail Sate-Operation PEG #4143 Clari?ed - 3:23.035 CDC gave 3~30~05 4i5i2005 Waiting-on pricing from Mot: inst._TBCt 4l22 4l13l2005 20 Replace 3 Ten-Air Valves isolstiori Rooms ASI #96 A51 Issued 3124i?05 tilleCsriI-iy 12 3i27i2005 #415 Waiting on pricing from?liilec coo gave hire-seeds sisrsoos a Values ship 4121- install date inst. TBG M26 4l13i2005? U5 Exhaust Sequence ASI #93 RSI Issueid $2305 NA 312712005 FCC) #416 RBI Clari?ed a 3l23i05 3320i2005 Mot: submitted PCO pricing on 0-20-04 #32005 No cost dhenge approved 4i5i'05 ?132005 .i-lTP issued 4t5i05 . Heed scheduled completion date 22 Chemical Shower Baekup'ilieluge #94 ASE lesued - 31'221'05- CLOSED NA 3i2?i?i2005 POD #41? Mott-submitted PCD'prioing on ?320?04 32002005 No cost change-approved 4l5i05 4l5i2005 NT-P issued 43.5015 3i2005 Need scheduled completion date 23 HCA Equipment Restart Sequence ASI #95 ASI issued a 3l22i05 Hemisphere NA $312005 P00 #415 Waiting on pricing from Mod PENDING 4i5i2005 to be issued. ?#1502005 To be evaluated and ediusted during Li'i?iC 512612005 224 HW System Pump Press Differential #7 to he issued McCarthy 3172102005 Waiting on Mccenhy in be Issued 4l15i.2005 CUHZA to address {addressed 4l2i'i2005 Vivarium Office Air Eisiribution Changes RFI #1000 Original CE Mods not performed McCarthy 10 39712395 CB it 150 Fieneii sketch CB Rev intent issued - 3i2i05 TED 5rd 105.2005 cs Rev 1 issued 4l5i05 4risi2oos! Need scheduled completion date 4i2?i2005? 26 WP Monitors Need mfgr. ?eld veri?cation of readings McCarlnyi'J Cl 42 4i12i2005 Field mod required at each sensor CLOSED 5i20i2005 'Triatek ?eid rep on site 5i?25i05 2T Certi?cation Mtg. to evaluate initial results 45015 McCarthy '8 401203005 Wort: to continue #1202005 Need schedule for coo OHS oversight 23 LEA. Lao Egress CB Excessive prelssure noted at doors McCarthy 5i23i2005 "(related to see. 34? sees-i see #43? RAF-testing conducted so use Elai?s?? Reference Pet ewmeil 5MB i' sis-#2395 GB to be issued for bypass damper control 21 62342005 Pending future-stairwell pressure testing cs, rims issued smos #1340 issued BIEWDS iN CONSTRUCTION 29 Mesh Need verification of proper operation 00! #62005 U.S. GOVERNMENT BUT INFORMATION U3. GDVERMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) INFORMATION ASI to he issued (are) - issued on stems ASI #100 issued era? 1N CONSTRUCTION 30 Lab Tower Excessive Make-Up Air CB #1?5 Setpoint changed to 0.025" 530102005 Of?ce Qantrol (now #35} Poo 435' cuHaa to-eualuate 5:1 adore {related to #28, 34: 38-39} #1340 sent via e-mail seems EIZQDGE Tri-a-tek relocation to he issued Ef8r2005 To he evaluated when RA system operational dr14i2005 GB issued 0 502005 Comp lete? EH ems at Basement Ring Corridor Fressun?zstion To be evaluated outing Lao Module Comm. Hemisphere #2752005 PENDING 5:1 3:03.005 32 Animal Room Door SeeIsI 3'55 CB #133 Balance rte-veri?cation after seals added McCarthy azerzoos Impact-TED duringsmoke testing PENDING HC EF Bypass Damper-Leakage Reference-Pat FE e-rntail 5i19i05 Hemisphere 5r2i2005 To be evaluated during-Lat: Module Comm. PENDING McCarthy. has sealed damper trams to duct 40! Has veri?ed positive closure Publisheddamper performance exoeed sped Affects ?36 only Air Damper Control as one CLIHEA to issue A51 - snows McCarthy 5 oedema {related to #28. 30. 35-30} F?CCllit 443 issued 6.03.005 12 Sl25i2005 Need to determine AFMS relocated location CUHEAIE HW Coordinated Bltdi?? GE Clari?cation revised VAV minimums mt CONSTRUCTION. osl ?93343 5 2533"? I Humidi?ers .101 to issue RFI McCarthy '6 512212005 issued?ratr??' RFI responseissued anode Clarificatiomssued BIOS 3'6 Clifioe' Penthouse AHU 0A Control CB #1?4 CE 1745 issued 5:051:05 McCarthy 1.1 5%95 (related to #28. 30. 344 3T~39l Minimum dam be determined via testing 28 BEBEGDS Sequence Update Issued 602E005 "1i'3't42'J-5 5' 3523'?? RA Control RA Damper control to be de?ned (EH) McCarthy 5 ell-42005 {related to #28. 30, 34. 35, 30-39} P00 #442 QB Issued states. 20 stasraoos IN CONSTRUCTION sawtome Re Control care 180 RA Damper control-to be de?ned {on} seeds at $89995. {related to 30, 34; 36, 37, 39} #445 RA Damper control de?ned with use Transfer Duct Addition Area ouerpressudzetion to be address?d McCarthy 4 534449995 issued snows 5 59233095 Clari?cation issued Er?I'r'r?? l?l EJ282005 IN CONSTRUCTION .39 Stairwell Pressurizationr Smoke Control #17?9 Draft A51 issued. for review 58305 MIC-Cilth 4- {related to air-Ed 30. 36-33) P00 #444 Clari?cation (pert criteria) for contractor needed 18 Ei28i2005 CB iseued $10105 DNETRUCTION do Tunnel Exhaust Balance. ASI #93 Air balanoe olan?fioatlon for proportioning air Macar?ty 5 ASE #100 between shredder room- and tunnel 19 532353305 LLB. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) INFORMATION ALE IEHBI :12 L15 C. 273 2523? 42 UE C- @2623? uls'. SENSITIVE 153m INFORMATION 4-7-1- iParallal FanSaquence Mad 1 . 1! SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED CB #182 Catastrophic failure?HU McCarthy 4 Bf14?095 CB Issucdi?rm?j? . Fafe Made CB #181 (38 Issued EHDIOS McCarthy 4 an 4:33:15 43. .. Operation RFI to be issueq .ny MgCarthy 6 Kiwi-?2005 I?l Issued SIMME 44 Of?ce Tuwer Cnnf. Ream Air Flow CB #153 Design Air flaw of 200 suf?ciem? [5121) GQHSE. 5&3 CE issued 61'22 McCanhy. I5 6128!.4005 45 Breathing Afr Hoses CB #184 Need specfdirec?crn .prnvided to McCar?w Ham-159m agree-95 CB issued? $23 McCarthy CE REV. 1 issued BEES Mockuu'p ?ppruvedisma aBalanc'e. Maeling WIOHS 6129 CUHZA 4? HEPA Fllter Restriction at 5181 HCA GBA AIL CUHQA U5. GOVERNMENT SENS1TIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION ?gherts, Jason 'nt: I Subject: Der rick Wednesday. March 30, 2005' 1:15 PM Rob 2523 Ihi Attached is he requested_praposn1. the requested dnor list. Regards, Kevin Derrick Engineering Manager Res?aruh Air Flo, Inc. kevin?resaarchairfla.com (Office) (Fax) (Cell) I have used a factor 0E 10 min yer duo: 1 ms. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE EILIT um: INFORMATION and attached . 4.--. - W-?vn- Ila-I1 . USE. 2E2aih .2?2all1: M3342 31'2914'2005 CUHQA Inc. Barge 2133!?! IDIHI Page 2852 Page 2353 [blE-?I 3-343?; 265.: IOIMI Page 2385 use. LIFE SAFETY COMMISSIONING REPORT U5. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SEU) INFORMATION Lott.I containment ?re alarm shuts down supply ail-and activates exhaust. treating a negative pressure on the ?oor. The combination of tho naga?tla ?oor pressure and the positive:- pressure created by the tan creates a large pressure: d?erertco that requires too much force to open the ata'rrwoll door: 3 Taiwan,' egress TI dclr?t?utano "allang door. Negatlva pressure In the ?oor should bobettor balance: with the Complete exterior-5 I positive, stalmall orasaura so that the ogross door can ha opened by aria-?ling no more ton-:3 than 3121 to! it; apart the door. [It aocordmca with m1. life Sta-?21? node. {The oovice use-:1 to measure the force required to open the door mamas-out at 30 lhf. and the device was pegged out. Enolca?n?g that it"roqi?rEE more than 33 [of to open the doorMann 7i22tatllj5 3mg: Fomg?gj?: ?in?ll S?fmf?g? Br been cheated 4 Iimsa. They have been encrusted all they can to stop the i ?av95:; I f? leak. Stated that Bryan Smith also is aware. 1W5 say that {has bad"? when In {Damper mu 059} dampalaaralrated for teat: are to ellhe: dlraotlon UL teat: class 2 and 3 The ?oor for the elevator lobby on floor] 2 Its iamrnod anoiwtll not I I so MISC $232005 release Upon demagnllation. Boniractorto-rohang door for proper 3-3145. MCC..coran-2te aratr?aooa s; Israooa. swing. . . 13559 and timing mm?? tom. Simptem t'rrirtng ?otsltar}. Simples will orb thalr wort: to; When. 1 ??ags or do: sorrows are to he provided loafer: ouudmg??or an. Alarm at am W3 goes into am. it should only alarm at [he paw. i s. I PM a Fife Signal mm the 11m? are glarm?gm an the This AI was determined due to an unprograramad art-lotto 92 ml mamas .FQP d??d Wm]? mnunma?a' ?5 Ef?gy? cpzj?::f goatactortn tho atauator lobby. Simpler; schaoulecl to more g:arh canons alarm 05 @232 12:11:22 gig?? ?s no ?na'm? mlat rzou AM. tors uprato needed tram Jo arao cmpiota Emma escutchoons plate: were rarnolroo or hot: teen 1 oral?aod more spams from by iobaito this 1 magma g3 6" we? imodted'do'rm. IFtopfaco all piatea before building is occupied. -.Fn'cjay 101T. Marcellus Install and pro-aloe comatattoaoata Before owner occuglas tho homing anti after constrootlon is complete. I I E14- .lCl oonlraotorto remove all smoke detactor covers. and all ooatmottooa 423-254: 5. Removal of lope am: cover: In process. By torts -perr:.r - till '1 ma?a (black tape. elm}. Santa-rat trouble. and alarm org nala were present on tha' _l .115 Jm gimms panels at tho atla. These panels need to be cl'aar of all trouble, roe-zoos. JCE: Overridao cleared. Panel-reporth to no coo?mod on glamour; supervisory. and alarm signan hoforo tho FACF can he oonstda'rad D9l30l05 by Simptex. roommate, Some panels had different Signals reporting us. our litFoaMATIo-N us, GOVERNMENT sensitive our Lawson, Robert (cmocrogooreroi Iu- - an: Ian- I From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Monday, July 09, 2612 2:39 PM To: Step hen c. (cocrocoozsrm Subject: FW: Safe ress Attachments: *9 C- 5 Fer-melutF'SiSa. EFs (Inc- - Thanks, Paul Probst Message-mm From: Fat Prendergast lmg" iitotogrendergasthrocon.com Sent: Wednesday, June 13,2012 7:26 PM To: Probst, Paul Cc: Dan Abitz; Chad Baker Subject: FiE15a'fe egress Hey Paul- Attached is all we could come up with. Our report isin storage, and unfortunately, back then we did not do the reports in electronic format. I have a call in to get it from storage, h'oureirer that usually takes a few days. Notes: 1. we did test that system with a safe egress mode. 2. our-testing procedure indicated that we recorded the space pressures, but don't know ifjit is in the report or-not. If you have a copy Ioolt in the same area as that testing procedure in Volumes-2 and 3. 3- ?e ii" for: it}; 4. we may not have recorded the pressures due to the factthat: a. thereis no adjustment to the exhaust fans- so you gtit whatyou get with both bypass dampers-open- b. the safe egress was put in as an additional safety measure. The onlvtime it would he initiated is if BOTH Air handler'simply fans failed. That would be a-d'ouhle or two faiiure scenariowhich is generally not accountedfor in industry practice. hat n?ceTaand the issues list which indicates the RFIS and Cosassociated with itltiten'j 1 on the list). i know that is not much - but hope it helps. Pat PatrickA Prendergast, F. EBA I Viroco'n, lnc.?I I direct: 315342.490? ext. 212 office: 315.342.9225 fax: ?--Crriginal Mange?? 1 us. GDVERNM ENT SENSITIVE our Uitcmsaisieo {so Ln' INFO amatlom 'uis. BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Fre?m; Prebst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:20 PM T0:PatPrendergast Subject: Safe egress Pat: This onw applies to the Vivarium area. Thanks, Paul. 2 GOVERNMENT SENSITWE BUT INFORMATION US. GOVERNMENT SENSITWE BUT UNCLASSJFED ENFORMATIUN SYSTEM CONSIDERATIGNS C: '3 .. t_lJ:i3r 42 :12 U5 262.3nl1.L - The vari?cone'pos'itioufot with both fans operating shouldfbe at T0953 .open for both fans. The vari?cone position with onlyr one fan operating should be 100% open for the operating fan and 0% open for the non~operatin fan. USE: . .. .. If there a a, single fan rant-ac to either - both-bypass-datnpers must go fully closed in order to maintain static pressure set point. The sequence is.st that the two position damper closes and the modulating damper shall tnotlulateto maintain SP set point. If either of the bypass dampers is cracked open just the static pressure set point will not be able to he maintained. There has been an ongtIing problem with the dampers not Closing at 100%plt33ed signalfront the BAS. . and Exhaust fan Inter-locks [mtsaz LIE es .. LI SC. State Statute ?1702 . - If ther'tHU has Both FAN A and FAN off in a failure alarnt all associated exhaust fans will go into safe gtess- operation. a If the AHU has only one fan failure all associated exhaust systems shall- continue to operate under normal operating conditions. Ifail, the entire system .. .. 25 23m 5 . will be disabled. The will be indexed of prior to. other exhaust systems deucnergizing. - i mill-:42 Ll =3 - If a single. fan failure occurs to. one of the pairs I the -- - - alias-tr 3 system will continue to operate under normal operating conditions". US C3 5 E?ialm .. b3 indaxed exhaust .fan pairs will be indexed to safe egress mode. 4. Safe Egress Operation tin-[3t a: US :2 2523.?: I The ODD numbered? fan will stay ON US "an mmtugpw?l?bgi?demd offu fan's, are-in egress titode?, 352M .. .. only will lf?illain ONwith'poth the twoposition eases. Inna: opera-i USS. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASJSIFIED U5. GDVERNMENTSENSITNE BUT UNCLASSIFED INFORMAFON . I - safe guess operatlen 1s so th at the bypass damper goes tn 100% open. it AHU and EF Restart after a failure. -- If any of theexhaust fans are in egress mode, the AHU Should already be effl- Tn re?Enable the-system, the. user- must. first disable from the SB 'Interleclts point in the text mode. Wait For static pressure to drep tn Clear anyr alarms present1 then Enable the.?SB Interlecks pointl?em test mode. - If there is a single fan failure to the era single fan failure t?e either of the paired exhaust fans the alarm can be cleared without disabling the system Simply reset the alarm fremeitherthe text or graphics to ON and I then to OFF again The. failed fan will be reset and come back on without latenuptien to the system. 1, All failures and-interlocks were tested and worked greperly 9-7-05. 2. During the Week of 11?3435, GBA was on site fer testing and noticed the interlocks were net functioning as tested. 3. Ex: GBA noticed the was ON and maintaining SP set poinL but all exhaust I fan systems were in Egress mode, This should never happen. LLS. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT U3. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED (SEU) hen-rm" . . . . .. ?1590 Ch: . . .. . R?Ybal Campus sensors or see me %_mjcon U-?se I REV '3 ?5-0 Date: ?tugust-?? Bv': WAS TIONAL 'i ii - - i .. i12lJ'Eaa'stisnsJ: . . Action . . -- sires-east: - 'L?riginitisi;Testa. Interest; Her?est PasThe exhaust system is enabled. (concurrent with EF - Start Sequence. - other two exhaust systems} use 5 EFS energize, tan motor status verified for both 252w" no System status verified. ct Two~position bypass damper bpens Modulating Bypass damper PID loop enabled, modulates to maintain static pressure. a The exhaust system is-ehablejd. (concurrent with tin-[Wight 6252?, 8 other - EFs energize, 'fan motor status verified'tor both ?vstem status. verified. Two?position bypass damper opens E$y$.iem5 Hun Vivarium Modulating Bypass damper PID loop enabled, . . - . Gammand - modulates to maintain static pressure. a The exhaust-system IS enabled. {concurrent with 1 ON EF - Start Sequence other-two exhaust systemsenergizes, fan motor status verified L1 c. System status verified. (?l-Emma Modulating Bypass damper PID loop enabled. [awed - modulates to maintain static pressure. Interl?cks 3' Start command issued to AHU upon all (3) e'xh'aLJst systems Run status verification. Outside air damper opens, and switch makes modulatefrom closed to preset 598 593 operating posrtlon. 70 ?fr: open Start Sequence Supply fans are started at minimum VFD'positions Supply tan in unison to maintain . .. SP setpornt . Heating program switches to operating PHCDAT . . contrel__s?tpornt. SP: deg Cooling programs becomes active- -. issue said to be resolved by contractor. US. M342 939M 0?15 a. U5. GOVERNMENT UNCLASSIFED BU) INFORMATION - . -- . . Functions! assesses. :i?regsiesrarnae verification - 'lnitia'Tet- . 3 - Fri-95Pass Failj i tees. a Record time delay between? system start command X. and exhaust systems starts System Flun Record time delay between exhaust systems starts 1 cont. Enable OHIO FF System Characteristics and AHU Start. 30 seconds Corn mend 'cont. Verify exhaust systems achieve static pressure setpoints prior achieving static pressure setpoint. a After 30 second time delay - BASremoves run command and AHLI de-energizes. to Outside air damper closes. end switch makes . Varicones modulate .to closed positions. .599 599 A-HU Step sequence Heating program switches to non-operating PHCDAT control setpoint. SP: TO'deg Cooling program becomes inactive. CHW valve closes 30 seconds atter'system On status is removed System Run 3: mm a from AHU. BAS removes run command from L's-'5 @2523!? hauSt'svstem . . . Enabjg .. .. EX - Modulating bypass damper modulates closed. )1 597 Command .. . w- Two-position bypass damper closes 2 OFF 30 seconds after system On status is removed 8m 59 Hence. a 2:313 3:22:35?. removes run command from Intel v5: 5 262mm - Modulating bypass damper modulates closed. 597 597 Ia Two-position bypass dampercloses "item 3 5 . t. a 30 seconds after system On status-is removed mid-a2 use from AHU, BAS removes run command trom . .. EF bypass'damper modulates closed- 597 59? I Iverify AHU static pressure is sufficiently-decreased a prior to exhaust systems de-e nergizing. System Characteristics Record time delay between system stop command -- and AHU stop 3 Record time-delay behoeen AHU system stop and exhaust systems stops - said to be resolved by contractor. US. Go FORMATION - Issue veri?ed resolved by commissioning agent. (bits: 42 us c. 2s2aih. EFs Page 2 of1l3 U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED (53th INFORMATION - . {Functional Tag}; gri?StEL-iiparameter? - ??c'tibn; . yie??pa?nn.? .tnitialjliestf lie-Test? .- initial-Test it: . - i .2 Pass- Fail Easel? centrist? programs . . . 7 i3 Adjust SF static pressure a VFD?ncreasejan setpoint higher VFDs modulate to maintain increased SP setpoint . sp System stabilizes to maintain New SP setpoint i Fan Bram . . a VFDs decrease fan speed pressure control Adtust SF static pressure setpolnt lower it VFDs modulate to maintain decreased SP setpoint Siam?Hm System stabilizes to maintain New SP setpoint . a setpoint is resets deg below LAT Adjust AHU LN. Setp?int Elg?i?r?eruawes modulate toWards_the open X. highse?'reiatliieet; SAT 0 Hot water valves modulate to maintain new LAT Prime-at thpf?itl tab'liz i t' in LAT Leaving Sign rgtoops as man a ne . 2 temperature pa control a PHCLAT setpointis resets deg below LAT A U51 AHU LAT Emmi?! Eli-Easier valves modulatetowards the closed IGWEPEIEWSE EAT 0 Hot water satires modulate to maintain new LAT setpoint Control loop stabilizes to maintain new LAT setpoint . a Chilled water values modulate towards the closed . position . . T?gg'f?m Chilled water valves modulate to maintain new LAT Unit Leaving air 5- d- - setpoint . temp eratu re 89' Control loop stabilizes to maintain newLAT 3 control (Cooling setpoirit Coil Control] a Chilled water valves modulate towards: the open. . . 'tion AdjustAHU LAT selpolnt . - . .. lbwewela?ve to OAT Chilled water valves modulate to maintain new LAT SD deg setpolnt Control loop stabilizes to-maintaln new LAT setpoint . 0- Issue said to be resolved by contractor. 5? G0 - . FORMATION - Issue veri?ed resolved by commissioning agent. Page? 3 at "5 GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE auT?uwcLAssirso INFORMATION .. . .. ..?Fu??tibnal- 33-3 Task Action . veri?cation .. . He?ie?t- InitiatTests .. sees- . . - . Pass- --"FaiI: tat-Eli? vv Pass: sail ii i a Pump energizes r_ Index_Pump' ON satpomt' Pump proof of-run indicated X. ?boveomemp Ht "r 1 d? tt Preheat coil setpoint degF i a wa if?? va we ma Haas 0a m5 0 4 Recirculatiing. ?crease 0w Index Pump setpoint a Pump minimum run time Is exceeded - 5 minutes )1 ?a below 0A temp b. Pump de-energizes, POH'indication correct .X setpoint degF Hot water control valve modulates to adjust to . decreased flow 1. -.-, . a Pump energizes Index.Pump ON Pump proof of run indicated iabmemtem'? Ht t?l l' d? tt Preheat coil setpoint degF . creased flow 5 . . . . . Index Pump setpoim Pump minimum run time Is exceeded - 5 minutes below 0A temp b- Pump tie-energizes, indication correct. setpotnt= degF Hot water control valve modulates toadjust to. - decreased flow Atr?handling . . .. a; ti-Ei a BAS indicates fan failure, alarms Failedfan A is indexed OFF Fa.? AHUsuml?a?apen 8 Fan Increaised s?peled IDLmEtlntingsditpot fistatic BUD 600 X. (ii-scanned setpolntis a equate maintains urlng ramp, I 1 AHU Failure Gravity backdraft damper isolates failed fan A. Fan A inlet cone on Fan A closes Inlet cone on Fan Et opens- I Exhaust systems-continueto operate in normal 9 operation mode . Disable Fan A Samesecuence is repeated as for a lailure. issue said to be resolved by contractor. . Jesus ue??ad resolved by commissioning agent. Page '4 of 13 LLB. GOVERNMENT SENSITWE EUTUNCLASSI FED INFORMATION "task Teet'Eareraeter .. seei- i? 'irerittpgation' EAWE-lit}raphios arteries - ?ea-Test: Initial Test. Reefer-3'1: P355 ?sai- sonata? if?; 1 cont. AHU Failure Cont. BAS indicates-tan failure, alarms Failed tan is indexed OFF Fail AHU supplyian-cpen disconnect Fan 8 FanA increased speed to maintain setpoint static setpoint. is adequately maintained during ramp. EDD BOUXX Gravity backdraft dam per isolates tailed tan A. inlet cone on Fan closes lnlet=cone on Fan A opens (3) Exhaust systems continue-to operate in normal operation mode Disable Fan? Same-sequence is repeated. as for a failure. AHU Restart after Failure Fla-energize supply fart? close disconnect Fan A Acknowledge alarm.? alarm clears Fan A'is indexed Gravity ha'ckdrait dampers open on'tan A. Inlet cone on Fan A retums from closed to montan operating postion. Inlet cone-ion Fan returns-from open to two-fan operating postlon. Fan decreases speed to maintain setpoint static setpoint is adequately maintained during ramp. Exhaust systems continue to operate in normal operation mode. Exhaust systems are stable Supply air? system stabilizes. - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. - issue veri?ed resolved by commissioning agent. U.S. GOV . SIFIEEH 9 Ihp3r142 LISC: 32o231hl MATION- ?Page 5 ganja-1:12 US '15 252mm LLB. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE UNCLASSIFED (SBU) INFORMATION I Functional HAS Gfa?hic? Test Parameter Action . Verification Barr-eat -- Initial-Test Ewe-5t I I 3 Pass, Fail s? "Pass Fail i: a Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears Fan is indexed ON _h Gravity backdraft dampers open on [an Inlet oone on Fan returns from closed to two-tan Operating postlon. Fla-energize supply fan- a Inlet some on Fan A returns from open to two-fan 2 com AHU Restart close disconnect operating postlon. after {allure cum' Fan I Fan' A decreases speed to maintain seipoint -'s_tatio setpoint is adequately maintained during ramp. Exhaust systems continue'to operate in normal operation mode Exhaust systems are stable i Suppr air system stabilizes. a BAS- indioatesAHU failure, alarms AHU is indeXed OFF 42 UCLcontroller recngnizes lailure'and begins to operate in safe egress mode. 601 501 Graphics indicate sate egress mode of operation . due to AHU off. 42 ?ag-3g? -- "Hill-[75L] Sir-Stem -- system controller recognizes AHU Failure failure and begins to operate in safe egress mode. 501 see note #1 Graphics-indicate sate egress mode oi operation 601 42 r: 5 252mm fo? I .. and begins to operate in safe egress mode. 5m 601 Graphics indicate safe egress mode of operation due to AHU off. Acknowledge alarm}r alarm clears $12532? continue to operate per sale egress 602 602 IX AHU Restart [1-352 . 4 after Sysiem Re'enrgiza AHU to disableienable. Failure. Exhaust systems and AHU follow normal system start-up. Exhaust systems are stable Supply:r air system is stable. C. -Issue said to be resolved by contractor. Gm.- li' - Issue Verified resolved by commissioning agenL miter-'12 use. - 0: ATION FtSEWo-cis . olid'?iizu us r: ?2ezaihi U.S..GDVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION - - . . . . . .. . . - . Ara-inn3355' "a Fm!" gate-Jail: Sate: agrees-?peratibndkBAS indieatesAHU failure, alarms $.15:ij .. .. continues to operate it - - Create AHU failure to tie-energizes -1 Safe Egress initiate Safe Egress Two-position bypass darn per remains open. Mods Operation Moduia?no bypass damper opens 100% 59% stair..- . .. .. .. Ham indicates operating mode of safe egress-AHU failure a BASindieatesAHUfaiiure, alarms USE We=ontinues to operate Egg-am? Greats-AHU to e-eriergises 2' Safe Egress initiate Safe Egress ti Twe-positien bypass damper-remains open". Mode Operation Modulation bypass damper opens 100%.- .. 5,3th indicates opera?ng made of safe egress-AHU failure. -, a .BASJnd'ipates alarms Greate failure 10.. .. IcOn?nUes operate! I 3 Egress M03: initiate Sate Egress Modulating bypass damper opens 190% Operation R021 system indicates operating mode or safe X- egress-AHU failure. a desenergizes prior to texhaust systems stem . .. enterin safe resso era ion. 4 Chargeterislies Charactensm statio- presgsure priorto exhaust I systems statichressur'e. ib'iFailure aiarm initiates? De. - - Great faiiure'te energizes I AHLJ Safe . . 2'32 AHU shuts down prior to-etber exhaust'systems 1 initiate Sate Egress . . . .. X. Egress Mode 0 gratin? geing into safe egress mode. AHUindicates.operating'mode of safe egress- .. 0 failurealarms wr_ .. .. . . .. :ontinues to operate Greatiailiire to zine-energizes x- 2' Safe Egress initiate Safe Egress Two-position bypassdamper remains-open. Mode Operation modulating bypass diam per opens 100% .- Exhauc "ndieates operating mode-ofisafe runs. :12 agrehh .. failure - issue sails to be resolved to? coniractor. tissue verified rasoiirad by commissioning agent. U5. USE. aevssis semen wiistiw .. I 5.0. 252mm LLB. GDVERN MENT SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION -. . -. -. -. - . . . -: - I i ?ttest seems-er: Action --: . . Harnesses. 4 nearer. inmates serge ?mart? US .. . .. alarms a: . .. . . . cuntmues 0 Climate mam-rig Hg . . . .. . .GfeatEu-iailure de?energizes 3 Sate Egress initiate Safe Egress Two-position bypass damper remains open. Mode Operation damper opens we 12 USE mam Exhapst system indioat'es operating mode of sale AHU tie-energizes prior to. remaining exhaust _4 System 8 Ch . . a systems entering sateegress operation. Characteristios imam a-ractenSt'C-s AHU static pressure declines-prior to remaining X- - exhau st system's Static pressureBAS indicates tan-motor status failLIre. alarms, removes run command Exhaugt Fan in ng?positiog damper modulates olos?etii. Failure Fail exhaust'ian-open 0. waftan amp? contmuag tome ate to ?2E2ailhi disconnect mamtam SP serpomt U36: . I con-ti nu S. I Upgrate? Exhaust fan system static maintained 504 604' continues to operate other exhaust systems sontinue to operate a . Acknowledge alarm! alarm eiears 605 605 LIE?Ormal star-FUD procedures Restart after. Fan motor status is sari-lied for both fans 505 605 Failure Re?energizeexhaus?an_ Twomposltlon damper modulates to open position 605 EDS X. 2 . . Modulatin dam to modulate to mils-teem ?252am; olose disconnect . . - . - .505 605 MENUS-C 52.52%" . .. maintain SP setpomt I gt ngntinues tp,;,operate. 505 505 i to) other exhaust systems-continue to operate .X 605 605 t1 AHU continues to operate .X 605 605 3 Cif??zw 5 252m? .U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED (SEU) .- . i BA?i'Gfaahlosi. Task action .. - a a. Initlal'Test-' sEistT'eE-t .FletTBE-t: - . .. .. Pass; Fail 333:" 'v -: Pass Fan-j - a BAS indicates fan motdtr'status failure. alarms, X. removes rui'i comb and ExhaustFan Two-position damper modulates closed. 3 Failure Fa? Hexhaust famnpen Modulating fdarnper'continues to modulate to X. I an? disconnect matntalnn SP setpolnt iBilzi-i?Hz?zE . .. bon?nuesm operate; .x I Exhaust tan system static maintained. 504 . 604 't AHU oontinties to operate (2) othe? exhaust systems-continue to operate a Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears 805 605' . . [follows normal start-up procedures 605 505 Restart after an motor status is verified-forboth fans X. 605 605 Pajama. Re me i Tworposition damper modulates toopen position 605 605 4 r9 fan- Modulatin dam er continues to modulate to ?2e2am:. close disconnect . 505 605 maintain SP setpolnt . . leontinues?to operate. 505 605 _g other exhaUst?sys'temscontin'ue to operate 505 605 AHUcoritinu?es to operate 805 605 a BAS indicates exhaust system status failure. and Ix both 'fan motor status failures. alarms Modulating bypass damper modulates closed. Two-Position bypass damper. closes. AHU rte-energizes before remaining exhaust Exhaust system systems Ham's": $3.52.?g717- - run enable removed-system de- BREW g?gaaw: both disconnects enernizes energizes. AHU static pressure declines prior to remaining . . r. . exhaust svstems static pressure. innit-l? US (3 ESE-airline. tandl I disabled due to system shutdown I -- .. .. 3.31.2..1'35f - S?jd ?10-'39 by caniractoh INFORMATION I I V- - Issue verified resolvad by commissioning agent. FIE-V3115 EFS Page 9'91 13 U3. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIF ED Task Test Parameter Action 1rl'erll?lisa'tion functional BAG Graphics Initial Test Pass- Fail ACTION ITEM l! . fie-Test 'ir' Pass Fail Initial Test ACTION- ITEM rte??rest US 6 ?252th> [003:242 Ftestart after Failure Exhaust System He-energlze exhaust system-close disconnects Aoknowlede alarm:Ir alarm clears 505 605 Systems continue-to to remain tie-energized. ?l 505 605 Toggle SSB interlock to disabiefenabie. The three exhaust systems and AHU follow normal system enable sequences. Exhaust systems are stable mm to. 01:er 1th:- FailUre Sequences Supply air system is stable [xx [E'tl?ii?iE 03C 1 :gssaalh} . Exhaust Fan Failure Fall exhaust fan-open diattonnect BAS in dicates tan. mototr status. failure. alarms, removes run comm and UN TWO-position damper modulates closed. Modulatingdamper continues't'o modulate to maintain SP'setpoin?l [continues to operate. Exhaust tan system status maintained. AHU continues-to operate .- other exhaust systems continue to operate U61: US US 2 ?2?28Ihi _?252arh; Failure EF Flest'a'rt after Pie-energize exhaust'fan- close disconnect Aoknowledoe alarm! alarm clears 505 605 Iollows normal start-up procedures 505 505 Fan motor status is verified for both fans 505 605 o. commit?erode. r: Two-position damper modulates to preset open position 605 s: has: 605 Modulating damper continues tomodulate to maintain SP setpoint 605 505 continues to operate; 505 505 other exhaust systems continue to operate 505 505 AHU continues to operate 505 "x 605 [pita-:12 03:43:42 LIE . 252801} Exhaust Fan FailUre Fail exhaust fan-open discontent BAS indicates fan mototr status failure. alarms, removes run command Two-position damper modulates closed. Modulating damper continues to modulate to .matotaio?F setpoint -- -- Eontinues to operate. Exhaust tan system status maintalned. AHU continues'to operate {2).other exhaust systems continue to operate C: testis said to be resolved by contractor. if - issue verified resolved by [03131242 US 0 252301: EFs Page 10'ot13v LLS. GOVERNMENT SEN BUT (SBU) 5 I HAS Graphics I Task 'Test? Parameter Action" 'V'ariilqathn initial Test Pie-Test ?Initial-Test HeTest tr . . . Pass Fail i933? Pass Fail. ?Eff.? 011??- a Acknowledge alarm! alarm ctear's 505 605 -- to Itoliows normal start-up procedures 605 605 X- Fan motor'status is ueritied tor both tans 505. 605 EF ?gs?tart after I Two?position damper modulates to presetopen 605 6,35 4 arlure Five-energize exhaust fan- positron. a @5287?: close disconnect a Modulating damper continues to modulate to 605 505 X- .. Imaintain Seipnint - ?mm if?? Ioontinues to operate. 605 605 - (2) other exhaust systems continue to operate 605 605 .X AHU continues to operate 605 605 a BAS indicates exhaust system status failurel and both fan' motor status failures, alarms 'b Modulating bypass dampermodulates closed.- M3542 U5 imam Wypass [tamper closes. Failure Fait'exit'aust system-open . .. -- - memos aggregating "l energizes. AHU static to remaining exhaust s?ems static pressure. us .. -- Iindioate - dISabted due to system shutdown . . . 1F 2523"" a Acknowledge alarm} alarm olears 605' 605 Exhaust System to Systems-con?nes to to remain de-Energi'zed. 505 605 Restart alter . Toggle leis-Interlock to disablei'enable; 6 Failure Re'energlze exhaUSt The three exhaust systems and AHU tollow normal - system-close disoot?rneots -d system enable sequences. $25531?? ,ExhaUst systems are stable . 1' Supply air system to stable lssoe salt! to be resolved contractor. tr - Issue verified resolvedhy agent. LLB. 90? Page 11 N15 US. GDVER BUT UNCLASSIFED (SEW) INFORMATION USIZ- 52:32am: mine 42 use _:?2I32aih: USE US USE US 0 Ihlt'3iI-12 USE :rTask Testfg?arametar' Aet'ion; Verification '?i?auegt - 2 ?9?79? - i .l - Peel?Fe" allure Star'tiSfoiil Sequences .- . . . . - . 8A8 indicates exhaust tan failure, alarms, removes run command Bypassgiamper modulates closed. Exhaust system failure static pressure-drops betow . . - . c- setpoint AHU ?tie-energizes before-remaining Exhaust Fan Fail exhaust fan-open 1 Failure disconnem exhaust systems go into-safe egress mode. a (2) other exhaust systems begin tooperate in safe -- egress mode after .AHU has tie-energized. (2) other exhaust systems and AHU gr M2 indicate operation insafeegress due Km off. . . Disable exhaLIst system in text mode. AHU and I Disable ExhaUSt SySlem exhaust systems penorm oer failure a A'cknowlerjge alarm! alarm clears X, I System continue to operate per sate egress .EF Restart after modes. 2 Failure Rte-energize exhaust tam disabiei'enable._ =5 252m, close disconnect Exhaust systems andAHU follow normal .. amt-Pup. - 6 Exhaust systems are stable Bu only air system stabilizes. BAS'LCohtrolle'rFatima sequences Graphics indicate loss of communication?with a - . BAS alarms. - AHU continues to operate as a stand alone .- - - Biig?gf?l Disconnect LAN controller. c?mmu?i?wn. Isystem oontinues to operateIcnn?nues in ope rate- AHU, and all three exhauet system's indicate Offline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. - - issue said to be resolved by contractor. U3 (30 a . .. V-- Issue veritiedrasolued by commissioning agent. 5? 2523?: EFs Page 12 inf-18 US. GDVER NMEMT SENSITNEEUT NCLASSJFED {5 EU) INFORMATION iS?Funotional? - . HAS. Graphics Task - TestParameter Action tteriftcatton .lnmal T951 Fi?-95* ln?lalTestcm Fla-Test . . Pass: Fail ta?: Pass. Fail ?new . . . . . . . Disconnect LAN a Graphics Indicate loss of communication With . ., 60? 60:, 3A3 contra] connection-lo Exhaust BAS alarms. I - a .. System?qntrol Panel 12- Iratem commas to operate .m us. ?12i??tl Cammu?'ica?on Is'yetem'ooniinues to operate. . I I FA - R021 continues to operate- AHU. and all three exhaust systems indicate Offline 2523'?? .. ?statusAcknowledoeaarmlalarm clears ystern CDHIIEUBSH: operatet. - ?a a BAS control to local AHU oont?rolpanel 6 system so" ""95 0 Opera 3? .. madam; . .. oontnuesto-operate. ontinues to operate. 2 CDWEESEEHOH a Acknowledge alarm! alarmolears NA NA NA .s2a2athin?ame-ct LAN-Connection a system continues to operate. . .. -- Isystem continues to' operate. .X continues to operate. continues to operate. Graphics indicate loss of communication with a . BAS alarms. AHU loses run oommand, contact opens and fan _9 .oe?natoizash ystem oontroller' recognizes AHU loss ofstatue and begins to operate In safe egress 506 603 .X I BAS control . mode .. .1 mam gamma recognizes AHU failure loss loss of status and begins to operate in safe BUB 606 X. oress de. 1325?? system centi'ollerreoognizes 'AHUioss of loss of status and begins to operate in safe 606 606 egress mode; AHU, and all three exhaust systems indicate ED a operation in-Safe egress mode . .. .. - Issue said to he rasoltre'd byeontraclor.? I 1 sn= ED I FORMAHDN . -. Isa-us verified resolved by commissioning agent. 5 GO 2523"" Revamst Fags-13 of 1s U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED (SBU) Functional j_ Ems Graphics Task- Test Parameter Actiow . iulerifi'oation Initial-Test Refresh initial Test Rs?Tast 1 - ACT NW - --AortoN- Pass Fall Pass Fatl ?my :6 Graphics indicate loss of communieation with us 0 ?2e2alm BAS mat-haust System loses run conlacts remain closed. un.. . . contacts open. and system operates in "emergency" mode. a System bypass damper modulates to? preset "emergency"(open] position thru pneumatic PRU. System two-position damper remains in preset b}l?3l242 us: ?252ath: haust system loses run I I contacts remain closed .. .. . ., @2523l'1? Disconnect power to local Exhaust system comm! pontacts open, and system operates in 8:18 control panel emergency made? I) m3: @2me module?ower :system bypass damper modulates to preset 42" mum?s mm 'emergency"(cpen) posttlon thru pneumatic PFt?y'. System two-position damper remains'in preset open position .. exhaust system loses run commandl tan-contacts remain closed and tan continues .to operate in "emergency" mode. 1 System bypass damper modulates to preset "emergenc?openj position thru pneumatic'PFiV. AHU controller recognizes Exhaust systems status failure and tie-energizes. Record time for AHU 603 608 shutdown us. EF controller failure. .?2?23lr, AHLJ. .. 1 exhaust systems indicate Offline . w- - . .. .. Shumcwn 508' -- X- 4603b ?"32 ?523'? .. failed, System .. US.) ?2E2aihi US. 3. 5 252mm failed. - issue said to be resolved by contractor. Gov - 1 DRMATION ?tl' - Issue verified resolved by commissioning agent. F5 Page 14-of'18 U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT NGLASSIFED (SEED) 1.;7Functianal HAS-ii?raehice . Task Test Parameter Action. =Veriticatio?n . Initial lay-Tag ?mam-eat ?Heat . Pass . Fail 2?33? .c ?v Pass: Fail c: a Acknowledge alarm} alarm clears 606' 606 I Systems contimue to operate per safe egress 606 506 IX Reconnect power to local modes AHU control panel Toggle linterlock to disablefenable. 606 606 HAS gun-{ml The three exhaust stems and AHU tollow normal module-power - . .. . - 606 XI 606 4 failure system enable sequences. I a Acknowled alarm! alarm clears NA. NA NA NA in Toggle min interlock to disablefenable. . 608 i 608' Restart . . - Reconnect power to local Exhaust systems tie-energize clue to enable . EF'control panel command being removed. The three exhaust syste ms and follow normal system enable'sequenoes. a Graphics indicate i'oss-ot communication 1.yith I I I $592252 of system statUs for exhaust 51 0 610. fans and tie-energizes. . system gets loss-oi AHU system 51 0 Disconnect bus status and operates in safe egress. ?610 II connection tolocal AHU 1-4 8. system gets loss of AHU system 610 610 control panel stamian operates In safe egress. I In - - I gets less of AHU system status and E10 610 operates In safe egress. rilHLJ1 and all three ex haust systems indicate Offline BAS status XTIXPimcdule-and sate egress mode 610 510 .X 5 moduie- gperation. - Communication Graphics indicate loss of communication with . a failure BASIalarms. of system status for exhaust Disconnect bus fans-IanId tie-energizes. I connection to Exhaust 0 2m Isystem gets less of AHU system 509 609 System Control Panel status and operates in safe egress. . - Sisystem gets loss oi AHU system 609 509 X. IX 2mm operates In safe egress. - a use 252s gets lossofAHU system status and IX 509 603 operates unsafe egress. AHU. and all three exhaust systems indicate Of?ine status and safe egress mode 609 X- 609 operation. t: - Issue said to-oe resolyed by.contrectcr; Gm- - Issue Veri?ed resolved'hy commissioning agent. ?2523I 1i FORMATION ?Page 15 ct 1E LLS. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED INFORMATION 3- Functional. raptrics Task .a-e?tiparam?te-r .ijpn; Ve?flgatiqnf_ --L . Hts?Test Initial Test I. Her'lfest - '13. - i Essa; Fail i if Fee's Fail - a Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears NA NA . NA NA - System continue to operate per safe egress Reconnect bus modes. . 51 610 connection'to local AHU [31-542 Interlock to disablel'enable. BAS control panel (3) Exhaust systems and AHU .follow normal module- system start-up. 5 Corn mu nication systems are stable failure a Acknowledgealarmi alarm clears NA NA NA. NA System continue to operate per safe egress - Restart Reconnect XTIXP bus modes. 609 609 connection to local EF Toggle Ira-42 Interlock to disabler?enable. control panel Exhaust systems and AHU follow normal system start-up. a systems are stable SafetfgiJShUtdown if:53? :Emvide low a ill-Iligtgse-energizes, "Temperature low limit" alarm L. . . tempe?a?m Shmd?w? AHU systems 'tollow AHU failure 1 ow opencontact stamsmp sequences X. Temperature - . - a Acknowledge alarm! alarm clears Manually reset low. Iimit' AHU and (3). exhaust systems follow normal start- up procedure a AHU de?energizes, ?Low suction pressure?- alarm ,x Provide low section static initiates LOW Suction pressure-raise setpoint AHU andlE) exhaust systems follow AHU failure 2 Sta-?e Pressure sequences. Manually ream Low static a Acknowledge alarmi alarm clears I AHU and exhaust systems follow normal start- pressure is . up procedure C..- Issue said to be resolved by. contractor. - Issue veri?ed resolved by commissioning agent. Page-'15 or 13 sevens MENT SENSITIVE our (sou; HAS-Graphics -- Task. TBSIFPaff?if?g?iari. Action, . verification - Initiai'Test- 'ReTesi' lnitiel__?Iest_ _'He?Tesr Pass Fail. ?gs -v 'Fiasis' AHU tie-energizes. "Firesiarm shUtdown? elerm Provide supply ddotsmoke initiates detector alarmetest switch AHU and (3) exhaust systems follow AHU failure 3 SUpply Bum starUstop sequences. SmokeDeteotor Aoknowledge-alarmf'aiarrn clears AHU and exhaust systems follow normal start- u'pproeedure Fteset Dept smoke detector Provide'zonerire alarm In 4 zone Fire Alarm zone associated with AHU Exhaust systems remain ON a AHU remains On I) All systems operateip D?em??hz From ?Fire?rpaht's: Oirerfidei-Pane} per FOP command I xx;- xx AHU energizes per FOP command AHU energizes with zone fire alarm AHU does notenergize with pres. LL AHU energizes with temp LL 1 AHU Home Stan?s? "mu" AHU does not energize with pres. HL AHU energizes with dust smoke alarm i from FOP I Ioperates independently command. ?5 @252 operates independently of AHU seeped- operates independently of AHU command. EF de-energizes per FOPpornrnand a EF energizesper FOP command 8 3 perates independently of EF Provide input 2 FOP commend. Operates independently of EF command. xx; AHU operates independently of EF command - Issue said to be resolved by contractor. U,s_ Gov FORMATION - Issue verified resolved by commissioning agent. 1 EFS of 13 U.S. GOVERNMENT SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED INFORMATION Functional ask Teal Parameter Action; 'Verlfica?gn; lnitialTeet Fla-Test. Initial Test IFIe-Te_st a EF'de-energizee per FOP Command EF energizes per FOP command 252mm ., . .. . .. .. . grateg of lb?lwl? HIS-C Provide Input 3 command from FOP . e, . AHU cperales independenth of EF command a EF de-energizes per FOP comm and EF e?nernizes per FOP command '?iwi? .. .. .. -- erates inde endentl Uf EF use; 2eegnj;._ Input Gammand' 5" 'D?i3"342 . .. - - - - - operates independently of EF command. AHU operates independently of EF command Return all ailpelnls and parameters tn normal. Ensure no alarms arepresent and aysrem-eperalea aa-teundfj? .END OF TEST I Fla-Teal Notes Misc. Action items: HEM ii" - Issue said it: be reaclved by contractor. - Issue resolved by commissioning agent. Page?la 011B 2?2alh; IbH3t42 252mm IDHEI42 EBEthj Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 3:16 PM To: Raymond. George Ce: Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Wigington, Darryl Walpole. Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Jue, Bruce R. ??fbfeet; RE?rl Egress testing. George 8. Team: This is just the level of detail I need at this point. Thanks and have a great weekend! (3.- From: Raymond, George Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 3:13 PM To: Chandler, George (CDCKOCOOJBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Williams, Jeffery Wigington, Danyl Walpole, Kenneth K. Probst, Paul E. Jue, Bruce R. (CDCIDCOOIBFO) S?bject: Egress testing. George, Below and attached is the egress test that FM E0 is planning in July for . - . Vivarium. A more formal schedule and test scripts will follow. The attached spread sheet is a sample of the test matrix that will 'be run for each door. The door included in the spread sheet are the doors reference in the commissioner's report. This list is not complete. We will be meeting with OSHE -to_clearlv define egress doors in the area. FM EU has developed the following test scenarios to con?rm the following; a Current operating condition under system failure and fire alarms in the biJild. Total door opening force under system failure and fire alarm in the building - Adjust door closure force onl W3 42 U5 5 9523"? Ito Sibf and test during supply fan failure and alarm conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm General building Fire alarm Supply fan failure Stairwell pressure fans (Evervthing but a pull station starts the fans) Freeze protections. Fire alarm system Scenario Verify.l Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determinewhi'ch HVAC units are affected by the ?re alarm system. assess TEST. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Mainieimnee and En gineering Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Cii?en Road, N.W., MS: Atlanta, GA 30333 O??ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.59?.2599 3'5 Pfeme eemider fire eiwimnmem? be?are primirg r1125! e-Maii Maths, Chester From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 1:55 PM To: Raymond, George 33195399 Egress You there. From: Raymond, George Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:54 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Jue, Bruce R. Knob, Stephen H. Walpole, Kenneth K. Bel?ower, Craig Wigington, Darryl Cc: Chandler, 'ge aba??ilirlfgiihject: Vivarium Egress This is FMEO response to BFO DD and OSHE to address the OSHA complaint of violation ofthe NFPA 101 Life safety code and a testing scenario for the Vivarium area HVAC system, ?re alarm system and door opening force under AHU supply fan failure. Paul Probst?s emaii below dated 1l20l20?i1 references the commissioning report dated 12l28l2010. in that report it stated; ?the force required to open doors during supply tan failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is i5lht. The dih'erential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount {45 lb?. As Paul stated in his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.33.1 it states; "Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure de?erence across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklered buildings or in water column in nonsprinldered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure difference under likely conditions of stock e?ect or wind. The pressure di??erence across doors shall exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by aforce of 30lbf in accordance with 7.2.1.45? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed ISlbf to release the latch, 30lbf to set the door in motion, and 15lbf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Slbf. These forces shall be applied to the latch stile.? "Exception No. I: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed 50lbf applied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, {50lbf in and existing building], 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12l28f2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation Measured {Dz-:31: 2 us c: a .2523? 1 Door calculation under normal operation Measured Measured lasers: us a 252m s.2o{wiragrdgi rd: wa-dl toroi dooropening force, its! Fm. force to overcome door cioser, door oreo, ft A door oreo, fr? dp pressure di?ference across door, in. of water distance from doorknob to edge of knot side of door, ft Under these measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. However, ifthe Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure condition; Inna-42 wooez?zamb I. If we adjust the door closure force on these doors to under Slb? these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. Door calculation 'under supply fan faiIure operation Eli-1has developed the following test scenarios to confirm the following; I Current operating condition under system failure and fire alarms in the build. a Total door opening force under system failure and ?re alarm in the building I Adjust door closure force on Ito and test during sUpply fan failure and alarm conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Eontrol Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm General building Fire alarm Supply fan failure Stairwell pressure fans {Everything but a pull station starts the fans) Freeze protections. Fire alarm svstern Scenario Verify Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by the ?re alarm system. ?est?Matrix Fire STAIRWELL DOORS States alarm AHU EXHAUST FANS 0K Normal Normal ON 0N OFF YES AHU dual Fan Failure (AHU Safety Interlock] Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm . Alarm ON ON UN General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pullstations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THE MAIN LEVEL. THIS TEST EXCLU DES THE SMOKE CONTROL PAN EL ON Doors that will be tested are listed as follows; OLE Object: Picture {Device Independent Bitmap} These doors were identi?ed during the original construction as egress doors and were tested to meet NFPA 101 and ADA requirement. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Moiniomnce and Engineering O??fcc Can tars for Disease Control and Pr?ieniion 1600 Clz?on RoadFax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.59?.2599 55 Plano consider fin: environment bs?irs priming fin-r owns! From: Probst, Paul E. USE 0:143:42 262.301; 2523m- 252m; Sent: Tuesday, June 19,. 2012 9:15 AM To: Raymond, George S?hject: FW:D/ivarium Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM To: Williams Jeffery Sit?jectt?ivarium Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. 1 have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. in the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lbf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 7.2.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exoeed 501bf. Since the project modi?ed air flow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore. we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. CK Report 2. NFPA 101 2000 3. ASHRAE Formula 1:113: mass-14- CDC Cx File: NFPA 101 - sis: File: ashrae For ease of reference. this is what the Cx report states: ?The Commissioning (CK) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushipull the door inwardioutward before turning the handle and opening the door." Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Wednesday. June 20. 2012 1:5? PM To; Ray and George (CDCIOCOOIBFW .. Pivarium Egress I am going to call. On phone with right now. Answer the phone. From: Raymond, George Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 1:56 PM DTao; frobst. PE. RE ivarium Egress Yea George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities MointenorICe and Engineering O?ice Centers for Disease Control and Preamtion 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: P104 Admits, GA 30333 O??ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1635 Celt-104.597.9599 :5 Pirate mmidar rte intermittent iatjiira printing this email? From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 1:55 PM 9=Barmon Seem:? livarium Egress You there. From: Raymond, George Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:54 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Jue, Bruce R. Koob, Stephen H. Walpole, Kenneth K. Bel?ower, Craig Wigington, Darryl Cc: Chandler, George gigg?fsub?egt; EW: : Vivarium Egress This is FMEO response to BFO DD and USHE to address the OSHA complaint of 1violation of the NFPA 101 Life safety code- and a testing scenario for the Vivarium area HVAC system, fire alarm system and door opening force under AHU supply fan failure. Paul Probst's email below dated 1i20i20?l1 references the commissioning report dated 12i28i2010. In that report it stated; ?the force required to open doors during suppiy fan faiiure does not meet the Nationai Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maxim um allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15ibf. The differentiai pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 lbt), As Paul stated in his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.3.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof en closures using stair pressurization shaii use and approved engineered system with a design pressure dijjference across the barrier of not iess than .05 in water coiumn in sprinidered buildings or .1 in water coiumn in nonsprinidered buiidin gs, and sh ail be capabie of maintaining the pressure di?ference under likeiy conditions of stock e?ect or wind. The pressure di?'erence across doors shaii exceed that which aiiows the door to begin to open by aforce of SOlbf in accordance with 12.1.4.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safetyr Code Section it states; he forces required to fully open any door manuaiiy in a means of egress shaii not exceed 15ibf ta reiease the latch, BOibf to set the door in motion, and 15ibf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Elhf. These forces shaii be oppiied to the iatch stile.? ?Exception No. I: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed SOibf applied to the iatch stile? Translations, it takes 15lbfto engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and setthe doorin motion, (SUlbf in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12/28/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation Measured iI-ie' U.b.Li {c 9 Door calculation under normal operation Measured Measured U5 252mb} - 5.20 A o' F: ng wa-d) totoi door-opening force, in; Fm force to overcome door cioser, it); door area, ft A door oreo, ft: dp pressure di?erence across door, in. of water 0' distance from doorknob to edge of knob side of door, ft Under these measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. However, if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure condition; 5537?00, 553900 and 553901. If we adjust the door closure force on these doors to under 5m; these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. Door calculation under supply fan failure operation L. SIZE. .FMED has developed the following test scenarios to con?rm the following; 0 Current operating condition under system failure and ?re alarms in the build. a Total door opening force under system failure and ?re alarm in the building 0 Adjust door closure force on conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm General building Fire alarm Supply fan failure U5 ?262aihi Stairwell pressure fans (Everything but a pull station starts the fans] Freeze protections. Fire alarm system Scenario Verifyf Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by the fire alarm system. :o and test during supply fan failure and alarm Fire STAIRWELI. DOORS States alarm AHU EXHAUST FANS OK Normal Normal ON ON OFF YES AHU dual Fan Failure (AHU Safety Interlock} Normal OFF MIN OFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON ON General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pullstations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PANEL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. Doors that will be tested are listed as follows; OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >3 These doors were identified during the original construction as egress doors and were tested to meet 101 and ADA requirement. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering O??'ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, N.W.. MS: 13?04 Atlanta, GA 30333 O?ce: 404.639.3335 Fax:40s1.639.1685 Cell: 404. 59 1259.9 Pieces retiridet? the pristiig :13in e?moi! From: Frobst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Egigiif?f?il?jecti.?w: CMvarium Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: ThUrsday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM ?To; wnlia?ns, :errery ivarium Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101. In the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is 15 Ibf and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 Ibf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 12.1.4.5, Exception No.1, indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 Ibf. Since the project modi?ed air ?ow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore, we actually are in compliance with the code. 252st..- Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. Ex Report 2. NFPA 101 - 2000 3. ASHRAE Formula *2 cocci; Repomdf a: File: NFPA 101 .. 2000.pdf a: File: ashrac formulapdf For ease of reference, this is what the Cx report states: ?The Commissioning (CK) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply fan failure does not meet the ?National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook". The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowable force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security latch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushlpull the door inwardfoutward before turning the handle and opening the door.? inu3,s2 262th Ihll'3'3'42 202mm Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: Rayr on .. fivariurn Probst, Paul E. Wednesday, June 20, 2012 2:38 PM 1. George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) From: Moss, Karen Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 3:00 P. To: Prob-st, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO), S. uchiect: RE: Vivarium All, Per requested attached is the Ex Report from Air Analysis and drawings showing the actual final airflows as set by Air Analysis and the measured pressure differential across the doors. Call if you have questions. Regards, 132009453 MI nemesis - CDC on0945 as] me Actual CFM Floor CFM and Karen Moss P. E. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Officer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: 770-430-3130? Cell: 404025-582? Fax: Will-480266? email: KMossl FEcdcgov 42 US C. Howard, William (Bill) Meechan, Paul J. (cociocoorosns) Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. Daniels, Charles E. Blanchard, Thomas M. Nogueira, William P. Tyler, John (CDCJOCODIBFO) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:32 PM To: Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Cc: Lingler, Arthur R. PW: Vivarium KarenJArt: Copying you on an e-mail sent by to the programs he appears to be of the opinion of FMEO and OSHE that the results show success. Karen - regarding items 2 and 3 below, will Air Analysis be turning over something we can share? Please call if necessary. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 mel [ham-42 Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:26 PM To: Probst, Paul E. (CDCKOCOOKBFO) Cc: Howard, Wiam (Bill) (cocxocoo/OSH E) Subject: RE: Vivarium Paul, I think there needs to be 1] a simple statementf'merno from OSHE to the programs on their tak may have a checklist from the ?nal walk through), 21a BFO document simply outlining the testing performed [Dec 28) and results [is the contractor providing something?], and 3) there needs to be some documentation of the ?new? airflow in the area esented to DSAT {Roman can provide a snapshot of numbers right before it is ready to be occupied}. If . is involved, there might something else that the RD would want. Need to discuss this, but I think these don?t need to be more than 1 page each. Keep it simple. IbiiSH a From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFD) Ser Wednesday "ember 29, 2010 1:39 PM To: Cc: Howard, 'fm (Bill) Subject: RE: ivarium 5 c; DEW-HIV- What kind of ?report and associated documents" are we talking about? Thanks. Paul 404-639-0505 From_ [mrs'z42 Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 8:4 To: Zambuto, Laura R. (cocroromcmo); Jami": Damon, Inger K. 525m Pose Luggage-SEE rc (cocxommcezm); All, The commissioningftesting of the Vivarium appears to have gone very well [Dec 28), and I believe programs should expect a report and associated documents indicating this sometime in January. The return to service date of Jan ID is still in effect, as there are a few things that need to be fixed and installed, followed bv a ?nal clean Up by Goodwill. There is now a need for program operation protocols to be modi?ed to re?ect changes in entering, reentering, exiting, etc. This will be a major agenda item for the Jan 13 HOG meeting. When ready, please send the ?les to OSHE and for review. Many thanks to all those who contributed to the looks very good and is a major improvement to the Mathe, Chester From: Frobst. Paul E. (CDCFOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, .June 20, 2012 2:43 PM To: Raynond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Elg?sai?fg??fs?tL Animal .S.uite..on From: Moss, Karen Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:13 PM To: Probst, Paul E. Lingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Cc: Belflower, Craig Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) .. I Paul, Below are my comments on the status as I know it to be. Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Office 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Dr?ce: mass-sac? Cell: 404-325-5327 Fax: 770-433?2557 email: KMossl ?lodegplr From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 7:27 PM To: Moss, Karen tingler, Arthur R. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Cc: Bel?ower, Crai Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOUIBFO) ear Animal?uite onl . .. .. Message: RE: Commissioning Pre?Test All: I am trying to consolidate some outstanding items that have noted andror have been presented to me. Most are to ensure that we leave the project with accurate documentation and ?eld settings before we move on and this one is forgotten. There may be other items you are aware of. Please advise status of completion. . 1. Review of JCI as-builts Darius with JCI and Craig are coordinating 2. item 1 below HTAB to lock down in ?eld, [Moss, Karen (CDCIOCOOKBFOJJ Done via TAB. JCI to decommissioning programming. 1 tit-E31142 sessile 8. 9. Item 2 below Provide stainless cover plate over control panelfMoss, Karen JCI not sure i will look at this afternoon. Update of the system graphicsr'database to reflect new flow settings TAB to provide new air flow at each valve, JCI to updatefMoss, Karen (CDCKOCOOKBFOJI TAB Report sent to Willie Mechanical Commissioning of the new reheat coils by TAB (is this done?) FMEO to witness operation veri?cationfMoss, Karen This was done TAB is finished. Updating of the existing BAS system documentation 3: software to refiect changes made Darius and Craig coordinatefMoss, Karen JCI Calibration of the output transducer at exhaust fan plenum modulating damper JCIfMoss, Karen Done before final Cx Re-tuning the PID loop - Karen Done before ?nal Cx Automatic door remote programmer who has possession'i?i'ilrfressr Karen (CDCIOCOOIBFOH Willis Mechanical is checking on this 10. Architectural as?builts - assume this is part of Willie soopefMoss, Karen 11. Thanks, Paul drawing are the as-builts, John Tyfer to provide. Mechanical as?built drawings assume this is part of Willis scopefMoss, Karen We have McKenney's as-builts, expected to get pipe as-builts today when I meet with the contractor. From: Bel?ower, Craig (CDCIOCOOXBFD) Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:31 AM To: Probst, Paul E. Cc: Walp ?it?itiect: . PaulT was on the importance. 1. 2. la enneth K. Suite I Inna-.4; US CI F'??aih' 5 II: E: area yesterday reviewing drawings to make asbuilts for theElah'l'mal suite. ~l--not-iced-two itemoofer The modulating supply air valve 06 that feeds air into the'Sp'ecial Procedure-Room :5 locked down for constant volume by The modulating control setpoint is based on the position indication of the wall switches for the cubicle rooms- This programming needs to decommissioned. However, the position of supply valve W-S1I36 needs to be locked down first. The positivefnegative command switches for the cubicles are still mounted on the well down in the space. These switches need to be physically removed for proper decommissioning of the controls for the cubicles. These are some items that I noticed by observation. Let-me know. if you need any assistance with these issues. Thanks. Craig Bel?ower Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) Raymond. George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 8:03 AM To: kevin@researchairflo.com CG: thil?? 4:2 I l-S Suhjeot: CDC ititrariurn - 404. Kevin: We are looking for some data relating to the [Mitt-42 262mm ivarium space. Attached is a Change Order proposal where RAF priced measuring egress pressures at select doors. We are trying to ?nd the results of the testing, but have been unable to ?nd them within the TAB Report- We are hoping that you may have the results on ?le. Thanks, Paul Probst. PE Asst. Director Facilities Maintenanceand Engineering Of?ce Buildings and Facilities Of?ce Of?ce: 404-639-0505 42 US C3. 2528??- Ib 3;:42 ?252alhi m':r3' 3.0. 2EEarh' lk 3f29f2005 CUHEA Inc. ?quaf' I ww? Roberts, Jason . - Frpm: Derrick "nt: Wednesday. March 30, 2005 1:15 PM In: Rn 1 Subject: Re: Pcommf (101 KB.) Jasan: Attached is the requested proposal. I have used a factor of 10 min per door and attached the requested door list. - RegardsJ Kevin Derrick Engineering Manager Research Air F10, Inc. kevin?researchairflo.com '1'13'1 ACE E?bn? (Cell) i Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Jue, Bruce R. (CDCIDCOOIBFOJ Sent: Thursday, June 21. 2012 9:34 AM To: Raymond, George Walpole1 Kenneth (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Co: Belflower, Craig Garner, Ron Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. Powell, Steven L. Subject: RE: ivarium Egress Ken I noticed your out of office message and l?rn on leave Mondav. Let's work together on this Tuesday [6,4'26) morning after the staff meeting. The actual test needs to occur anv evening or weekend afteriulv 9. We are in the middle of ordering and replacing FACP hardware. BFU CE From: Raymond, George Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 2:48 AM To: Walpole, Kenneth K. Jue, Bruce R. (CDCIOCOOIBFDJ Cc: Belflower, Craig Garner, Ron Probst, Paul E. Bowen, Ken L. . Subject: Vivarium Egress Ken/Bruce, We need to develop test scripts and a schedule for performing the below mentioned test. Please coordinate together and get with Craig and Ron to identify any ET resources you need. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce Carriersfoi? Disease Con trot and Pi?E?t?mHifmI 1600 Clifton Road, N.W., MS: Atlanta, GA 30333 Fax: 404.639-1685 Ce?: 404.597.2599 5,5 Pieare consider the emsrorwzem? ba?va primiag this s-amiz' From: Raymond, George (CDCXOCODJBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:54 AM To: Prohst, Paul E. Meechan, Paul J. Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Jue, Bruce R. Koob, Stephen H. Walpole, Kenneth K. Bel?ower, Craig Wigington, Darryl (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Cc: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Vivarium Egress This is FMECI response to BFO DD and DSHE to address the OSHA complaint of violation of the NFPA 101 Life safety code and a testing scenario for the Vivarium area HVAC system, ?re alarm system and door opening force under AHU supply fan failure. Paul Probst's email below dated 1i20i2011 references the commissioning report dated 12i28i201?. In that report it stated; ?the force required to open doors during suppiy fan failure does not meet the Netionei Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum aiiowahle force per this code in a means of egress is 15in. The differentiai pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 ea. As Paul stated in his email below, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 1-31 Life Safety Code Section 7.23.9.1 it states; "Smoke proof enciosures using stair pressurization shaii use and oppro Lied engineered system with a design pressure difference across the barrier of not iess than .05 in water coiumn in sprinidered huiidings or .1 in water coiumn in nonsprinkiered huiidings, and sh at! be capabie of maintaining the pressure dhj?erence under con ditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure difference across doors shad exceed that which aiiows the door to begin to open by aforce of30ibf in accordance with 12.1.4.5? i Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fatty open anyr door manuaiiy in a means of egress shaii not exceed 15ihf to reiease the latch, Bdihf to set the door in motion, and l?ibf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without ciosure shaii not exceed Eih? These forces shaii he applied to the iotch stiie. "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing buiiding shaii not exceed 50ibf appiied to the iatch stiie? Translations, it takes 15 bf to engage the latch on the door, 3Ulbf poUnds to break the seal and set the door in motion, in and existing building], 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12f2812010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation Measured .l'i c? Iibll3li42l ESE-aim Door calculation under normal operation I I I C: I. 252m Measured Measured i . 2 Ila?. 31-242 US 25 alh,? 5. 2m r: 2(W?d) totoi door-opening force, inf Fag =force to overcome door cioser, ib; door area, ft A o'oor area, ft?? do pressure difference across door, in. of water distance from doorknob to edge of knob side of door, ft Under these measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. However, if the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may 55511:? issuesin a supply fa n.fail.ura..condition; I. If we adiu st the door closure force on these doors to under these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. Door calculation under supply fan failure operation Ibi?izi 2 262ml FMEO has developed the following test scenarios to confirm the following; I Current operating condition under system failure and fire alarms in the build. II Total door opening force under system failure and fire alarm in the building 0 Adjust door closure force on mast-42 use ?2aEaurn to 51b; and test during supply fan failure and alarm conditions. Testing Scenario HVAC Control Scenario AHU Duct detector Fire alarm General building Fire alarm Supply fan failure Stairwell pressure fans [Everything but a pull station starts the fans) Freeze protections. Fire alarm system Scenario Verify Fire alarm matrix provided in the original contract documents Determine which HVAC units are affected by the ?re alarm system. Test??W Fire STAIRWELL DOORS States alarm AHU EXHAUST FANS 0K Normal Normal ON ON OFF YES AHU dual Fan Failure Safety Interlock] Normal OFF MIN DFF AHU Duct detector Trouble OFF MIN OFF General Fire Alarm Alarm ON ON UN General Fire Alarm with AHU Shutdown Alarm OFF MIN ON Pull stations Alarm ON ON OFF Note: THIS TEST EXCLUDES THE SMOKE CONTROL PAN EL ON THE MAIN LEVEL. Doors that will be tested are listed as follows; OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) These doors were identified during the original construction as egress doors and were tested to meet NFPA 101 and ADA requirement. George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facfiitfes Maintenance and Engineering O??ice Centers for Disease Control and Proper: tibia 1600' Cli?on Road, N.W., MS: F-04 Atlanta, GA 30333 O??ice: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1685 Cell: 404.597.2599 55 Please scaridar sitters-prisms: I?Jafara?prz'rzrirg this Lit?mat? From: Flrobstl Paul E. Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM T9: Raymond, George 3359213? Wed: Vivarium Egress FYI From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:18 AM To: Williams Jeffery (CDCJOCOOJBFO) Egress Jeff: This is following up on an issue at the Vivarium that we talked about in late December. I have attached both the commissioning agent's report as well as the applicable paragraph from the 2000 edition of NFPA 101- In the report, it is noted that maximum allowable force is ?l 5 [hi and that the differential pressure corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount (45 Ibf). The State of Georgia recognizes NFPA 2000 is the current version of the code. Section 4 T.2.1.4.5. Exception No.1. indicates opening force for existing doors to not exceed 50 lbf. Since the project modi?ed air flow to the system, we feel it is appropriate to label these doors as existing. Therefore. we actually are in compliance with the code. Please reply with your thoughts. Paul Probst Attachments: 1. CK Report 2. 3. ASH RAE Formula itt'it3 112 USE: File: - CDC 252mm: formulapdf}? rid: File: NFPA 101 - 2000.pdf}} File: ashrae For ease of reference, this is what the Cx report states: ?The Commissioning (Cx) Tests demonstrated that the force required to open doors during supply tan failure does not meet the "National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 101 - Life Safety Handbook?. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means of egress is 15 lbs. The differential pressure measured across egress doors corresponded to a force greater than three times that of the allowabte force per code. Also, on some doors the excessive negative pressure prevented the release of the electronic security iatch as commanded by the card reader; it was necessary to pushlpuli the door inwardfoutward before turning the handle and opening the door.? Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCJOCODIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 11:19 AM To: Raymond, George Subject: FW: militias-SC- Safety List I forgot to copy you. Sorry Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404-639?3303 Of?ce 404-639-0499 Fax From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 11:15 AM To: Chandler, George Williams, Jeffery Cc: Bowen, L. CDCI COOIBFO) U5 C: Subject: FW: 252mm. Safety List George, Here is the list of Safety items that we have come up with for item #3 and #4 on the letter: Bullets 3 and 4 Safety Issue List: incinerator Stack (December 2007 covered under warranty OGC Report - Lightning Strike {June 2007) Reliability Study (relating to Emergency Power] (April 2009) NIOSH Audit - [February 2012) {On going) 3,545,? (April 2009) Fire Alarm System Troubles [Repairs On going] Black out report (January 2012] Concord Safety Audit 10. Vivarium Project {December 2011} 11. Life Safety Battery Project {November 2009} 12. Bird Strike Georgia Power Substation George ifwe need to provide any emails and document on Bicsafety incidents, we need for Safety to identify them and then we can pull any information we have. Just let me know how to proceed so we can get the information you need. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-639?3303 Of?ce 404?639-0499 Fax Mathe. Chester (CDCJOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOJBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 11:19 AM To: Raymond. Georne (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: Safety List I forgot to copy you. Sorry Thanks. Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404-639-3303 Of?ce 404-639-0499 Fax From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCODIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 11:15 AM To: Chandler, George Williams, Jefferyr (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. CDCIOCOOIBFO) - Safety List George, Here is the list of Safety items that we have come up with for item #3 and #4 on the letter: Bullets 3 and 4 Safety Issue List: Incinerator Stack (December 2007 - covered under warranty occ Report Lightning Strike - (June 2007*} Reliability Study (relating to Emergency Power] (April 2009) Audit - (February 2012) ?'30 5? .(April 2009) Fire Alarm System Troubles {Repairs On going) Black out report {January' 2012} . Concord Safety Audit 10. Vivarium Project (December 2011) mewewewwe 11. Life Safety Battery Project (November 2009) 12. Bird Strike Georgia Power Substation George if we need to provide any emails and document on Biosafety incidents, we need for Safety to identify them and then we can pull any information we have. Just let me know how to proceed so we can get the information you need. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404-639-3303 Of?ce 404-639-0499 Fax Maths, Chester (CDCIOCODIOSEP) From: Williams, Jeffery Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:06 PM To: Georae (copiocoorero) Subject: Re: EDEIEQIEUSH Egress Issues George, This is not completely accurate. An of?cial interpretation was never requested and the team had already made a determination thatthev met code. No process was followed, hence the breakdown in comms. .1 From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 03:59 PM To: Chandler, George Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOJBFD) i [b3l3':d2 Subject. 252W Egress Issues George, it stated earlier today FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors in - Vivarium. Paul sent an email to Jeff Williams on ?li20i2011 asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response, we (FMEO) viewed the letter of the code was applicable. The Commissioning report stated: "the force required to open doors during suppiy fan failure does not meet the Nationai Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum aiiowaoie force per this code in a means of egress is 15ibf. The dih?erentiai pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount Mash.? As Paul stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.23.9.1 it states; ?25m cite proof en ciosures using stair pressurization shaii use and approved engineered system with a design pressure di?erence across the barrier of not less than .05 in water coiumn in sprinidered huiidin gs or .1 in water coiumn in nonsprinkiered buiidin gs, and shot! be capabie of maintaining the pressure difference under conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure di?erence across doors sh exceed that which oiiows the door to begin to open by a force of 30ibf in accordance with 12.1.4.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.1.4.5 it states; ?The forces required to fatty open any door monuail'y in a means of egress shaii not exceed lSibf to reiease the iatch, 30ibf to set the door in motion, and 15ihf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without ciosure shaii not exceed 5ib? These forces shoii be appiied to the iatch stiie.? "Exception No. l: the opening force for existing doors in existing buiiding sh ah' not exceed SOibf appiied to the iatch stiie? 1 Translations, it takes engage the latch on the door, 30lbf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12(23[2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: Finn-r n-alr-Hlaf-inn Fan Failures ELC. 2523th Based on this our worst door is Bibs over code. We will perform extensive test in this are the second week in July 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. 0 No action required 2. lfthe EJI'istinoT exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan . . 2:32am; .. . - Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under I Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. I Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a soppiy fan failure condition. 3. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation ofthe code is correct. [by the way he doesn?t reference the section of the code} then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; Ir On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. I Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their Speed on a supply fan failure. I Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the doorLesion} ssi?i; .. Vivarium Egressee..asFW.:. . Vivarium Egress? George K. Raymond Deputy Director ties and Engineering Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Reed, MW, MS: 1104 Atianm, GA 30333 O?ice: 494.639.3335 Fer-104.639.1685 Celt: 404.597.2599 5% Flame mmider rije eew?memem? egm prim?ieg ibir eermi! 252mm iES??ject: To: Maths, Chester Bowen, Ken L. Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:41 PM Raymond George Re: Egress Issues George are the 3 doors in question egress doors? From: Sent From: Raymond, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 03:59 PM To: Chandler Geore Williams, Jeffery BOWEN, Ken L- Egress Issues George, A stated earlier today FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors in warium. Paul sent an email to Jeff Williams on ?ll20l2011 asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response, we viewed the letter of the code was applicable. The Commissioning report stated: ?the force required to open doors during supply fen failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this code in a means or egress is t?lbt. The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greaterthan three times that amount (45lbf). As Paul stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.23.9.1 it states; ?Sm olte proof enclosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure difference across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinklered buildings or .1 in water column in nonsprinldered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure difference under likely conditions of stock effect or wind. The pressure di??erence across doors sh all exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by a force of 30lbf in accordance with 12.1.4.5? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 12.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed ISlbf to release the latch, 30lhf to set the door in motion, and 15lbf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interiorside-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed 5 lb f. These forces shall be applied to the latch stile.? xception Na. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed Stillbf applied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes 15lhf to engage the latch on the door, 30 bf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12/28f2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the door opening force was calculated as follows: rah-I lint-inn Imr?lnr cunnlu fan failure operation Itlli3: 42 Li seas-31m Based on this our worst door is over code. We will perform extensive test in this .are the second week in July 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, Sles, the doors are in compliance. in No action required 2. Ifthe Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan' failure condition; 42 US 0. 262am; I I Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under I Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. 0 Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. Ifwe are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. (by the way he doesn?t reference the section of the code} then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; - On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. I Install VFD's that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. 0 Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the-door or relieving pressure across the door. BEEF cs-Pi/tizivarium Egress? Jivarium Egress? George K. Raymond Deputy Director Facilities Maintenance and Engineering Of?ce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, NW, MS: i104 Atlanta, GA 30333 O??Iee.? 404.639.3335 Fax: 454.639.1585 Cell: 404 .5 9? .25 99 555 Name mm?ier ibe befinre pie'ezfiieq fie)? Liz-waif Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, George (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:54 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Maxwell, James C. (CDCJOCOOIBFO) Subject: afety List Joe. Paul and Jan: i understand that an overall POC for coordinating the Congressional response is In the meantime I would like to share the following with you. For Congressional ltem we commented on Jan's narrative (see below attachment). EFO comments hl? response 6-26. .. For Congressional Items 2, 3 and 4, we ask that OSHE review the following incident list to determine which fall into the ?safety or biosafety incidents? that we should respond to and for which we need to provide documentation. Incinerator Stack (December 200? covered under warranty GAO Report Lightning Strike (June 200?) Reliability Study (relating to Emergency Power) - (April 2009) I NIOSH Audit - (February 2012) SAT Resorts (On going) juries (April 2009) Fire Alarm System (Repairs On going) Black out report (January 2012) 9. Concord Safety Audit 10. Vivarium Project (December 201 1) 11. Life Safety Battery Project (November 2009) 12. Bird Strike Georgia Power Substation Joe, the current range of engineering solutions forth - Code Jurise you requested at today?s meeting are below. Option 1 is listed as a possibility since we still have an internal disagreement on whether or not there is an actual code violation and Jeffwill issue an Fall] on this soon. We are evaluating the options in ltesm 2 and 3 below. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, 50lbs, the doors are in compliance. 4- No action required 2. If the Existligg exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure condition; 252.301- - Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under Elbf II Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. 0 Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. [by the way he doesn?t reference the section of the code] then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. I Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. - Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. CDC is one of the few institutions in the world that maintains a comprehensive diagnostic facility with the capacity to detect almost all known microorganisms that cause disease in humans. These laboratories have an essential role in determining the cause of outbreaks of infectious diseases- The state and local public health departments as well as ministries of health in other countries depend on CDC's ability to assist with dif?cult diagnoses, especially when the cause ofan outbreak is unknown or when special biocontainment precautions are needed. such a Disease Laboratory (buildin a total or JSSAQDD Net Usable Square hat rm 9} of which NUSF is in th I'bit'3ii42 3-0 252mm onditibns with state?of-the-art equipment. The Emerging infectious HI was designed to meet these needs and consists o. Gross Square Feet 5: and 145 000 NUSF ig_th mils-.42 so . 252.31 I I: E's. Emergi ng infect-i consists of a 1) laboratory a nd mom to 2B2alh; ll] s3: 42 spook-fig Eng 21mg] utility plant to support the - ub:r_3::42 SE. .. .. laboratories aroused to" work and the rest to support thctiuities [in other words about Ilaboratoriesi. ibil3i.-i.2LIIS-.di.l 252mm m:r3i42 IJ 252mb:- . nyof the pro gram-s-irr-Buildi nisted belowjr-utilize someol'the IiThe 5214 project also included a new central - modernization of the Roybal campus.) The laboratory tower acilities for . I . with a wide variety of infectious agents. The tower was {?ames l-H-Feeii-Pyrgeurrentiy only 37% of the paces. The programs that occupy the tower include: Th a - laboratory, and a complex of laborat tones and laboratories icommo ly referred to areas to support these specialized laboratories and Vivarium. Work in th I [mil-'12 US. 262th; 262mb; rb:r3i.42 IJS 0 . 2B2aih',? 42 262mb: [3'34 infectious disease training laboratories to support the National Laboratory Training Network and other intramural programs specimen receiving :hioterrorisrn rapid response and advanced.tech-Irioiogies, home of'the Laboratpcy Ukt?]: Isih'i's infectious diseases pathology respiratory bacterial diseases such as meningitisl cumth Liknzirvriged'ia?re speci?cs: HW Viral hepatitis measles, mumps, rubella gufsi?gg aired . euni'riienr [jkna]; Should this be responded? osiit?'ehistiris so; grojoir'usgara include here? building ("13,0011 net square feet) consists of Vivarium spaces, a facility for provision of onsisting of "333.4,, and signi?cant building includes: H1 LL, 42 ll': rbilEI:-:42 us :3 ?2s2ami I I: 2E23rh' Are then: others we should. i 1 I Tuberculosis (Vivarium only} I Rabies {viverium only) 2623I'h} [ix-I3: 42 designed to provide the maximum so few and security for infectious disease work. it is 252mm I also home to ma rw select agents. These includel Inner-12 LI SC. 2:32am:- us 0 262arl'i' Inn'smz 2E2alh. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:54 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Maxwell, James c. Subject: Fw: use Safety List Joe, Paul and Jan: I understand that an overall POC for coordinating the Congressional response ls In the meantime [would like to share the following with you. For Congressional Item we commented on Janis narrative (see below attachment). 1 and comment reaponse For Congressional Items 2, 3 and 4, we ask that OSHE review the following incident list to determine which fall into the ?safety or biosafety incidents? that we should respond to and for which we need to provide documentation. Incinerator Stack {December 2007 covered under warranty GAO Report Lightning Strike (June 2007) Reliability Study {relating to Emergency Power) 4 (April 2009} NIOSH Audit - (February 2012) A1 Reorts - (On going) "2.3614? 252 (April 2009} Fire Alarm System (Repairs On going) Black out report (January 2012} 9. Concord Safety Audit 10. Vivarium Project (December 2011) 11. Life Safety Battery Project (November 2009} 12. Bird Strike Georgia Power Substation Joe, the current range of engineering solutions for the Vivarioum Code louse you requested at today's meeting are below. Option 1 is listed as a possibility since we still have an internal disagreement on whether or not there is an actual code violation and Jeff will issue an Fall) on this soon. We are evaluating the options in ltesm 2 and 3 below. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, 50lbs, the doors are in compliance. I No action required 2. If the Existing exceptions does not apply. we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure conditionltm?i'? 5.0. 252mm} I - Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under S?bf I Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. I Install a door aSSist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. {by the way he doesn?t reference the section ofthe code] then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; a On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. 0 Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. 4- Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. CDC is one of the few institutions in the world that maintains a comprehensive diagnostic facility with the capacity to detect almost all known microorganisms that cause disease in humans. These laboratories have an essential role in determining the cause of outbreaks of infectious diseases. The state and local public health departments as well as ministries of health in other countries depend on ability to assist with dif?cult relies-12 US 0. 6 252mm 202th;- Ed};r 5,115.11 . . .. .s?i?seselaboratory was designed to meet these me: 354.000 Grass Square Feat GSF tota or 15 - [Lama spasm-.- diagnoses, especialli when the cause ofan outbreak is unknown or when special biocontainment precautions conditions with state-of-the-art equipment. The Emerging Infectious .000 Net Usable Souare reet ofwhich 13.000 NUSF is in thel Raga; I safe mas-42 ate-alga I Emerging. nfectiousDiseases-La borato and-a} the utility plant to support the eapaasioomoderniza tion of the Roybal campus} The laboratory tower 262mm LS 262mm:- ibii3}: 2 LS. 262mb} .S.C 252mb! aroxima ersonoel set sunaiaa'tstristaa the II 4.. .and mspoo wuss in th 'S?s'ad? lags laboratgfian of?ce portion the building..? Eulldl? - . tel .. - personnel: it - . consists ofa 1) laboratory and la boratorian of?ce [The 3214 project also included a new central USC. rovide lities for work with a wide variety of infectious agents. The tower was a: m: ctivities {in other wordsI about dis-ii - ta-Feal-l-?u?Eeurrently only 31% of the aboratories are used to I work and the rest to support th 13% of the tower is Currently used aaboratories]. spaces. The programs that occupy the tower include: i. I ?3?42 I'I'D'Fhuilding {2134000. oetsquare-feetJ-consists ofEivarium spaces, a facility for provision of brig; tong supplies and washing glasswar laboratory, and a complex of laboratories consisting of 252mb: [Mil-$42 US 252mb; Infectious disease training laboratories to support the National Laboratory Training Network and other intramural programs specimen receiving bioterrorism rapid response and advaneed-techhologieehprne Response sultaniment infectious diseases pathology respiratory bacterial diseases such as meningitis} beluga-Intent Need morespeci?ss Hl'v" llfiral hepatitis Measles. mumps, rubella . of? "list. "9'53 ?"115- 3 0d. - Comment Likes]: Should'thisbe espanded? ?If. r? Comment Like-l]: Are there others we should' include bere?? suites of enhanceaboratories and laboratories [commonly referred to as them and signi?cant mechanical areas to support these specialized laboratories and vivarium. Work in thuilding includes: relieve LLS C13 - DFl'Dznh'. .l mils-42mm}: s- eszalm was} 42 uses as 3 I I [El?rli 252mb. ., 525 a Tuberculosis [Vivarium only} - Ra bies [viva riurn only} 42 252arh; Ewsq?v'lb 5 designed to provide the 2525"?? in mam-seleet-agen? .. .. Spec-TEE..qu 262alhj: whit-.42 US CDC is one of the few institutions in the world that maintains a comprehensive diagnostic facility with the capacity to detect almost all known microorganisms that cause disease in humans. These laboratories have an essential role in determining the cause of outbreaks of infectious diseases. The state and local public health departments as well as ministries of health in other countries depend on CDC's ability to assist with dif?cult diagnoses, especially when the cause of an outbreak is unknown or when special biocontainment precautions are needed, such a - onditions with state-of-the-art equipment, The Emerging Infectious Disease Laboratory (buildin a was designed to meet these needs and consists of: 364,000 Gross ?gua re Feet IGSFI total or 158,000 Net gash]: Sguare Feet ofwhich EDDIE) in th nd laboratorian of?ce portion of the . ro?re rs maintenance. capsule, Emerging infectious Diseases Laborato 510'. consists of a 1) laboratory and laboratorian of?ce tower and 2} thel 2s23lli: I. (The 5214 project also included a new central utility plant to support the - . - modernization of the Roybal campus] The laboratory tawer W996 cilities for work with a ety ofinfectious agents. The tower was designed with about 65% of the laboratories belnand 35 +e+ealiey7?eurrently only am of the laboratories are used foork and the rest to support th ctiyities [in other words, about 13% of the tower is gurrentlg used a boratoriesl. ibl- Many of the programs in below} utilize some of thaces. The programs that occupy the tower include: - Infectious disease training laboratories to support the National Laboratory Training Network and other intramural programs specimen receiving 0 Ibioterrqrism rapid response ahood-yaobedtechnoiog'ies, home eightiespay-sesame Memori?dmm?, Comment titan: ls meant I infectious diseases pathology a respiratory bacterial diseases such as meningitisI morespecifies' Hl'u' I Viral hepatitis Measles, mumps, rubella l" . I i il-lerpes gurus? comment [jabs]; should this be expanded? - comma-mi: no there other: we I I i?dude'l'ieris? Th building {"11000 net square feet] consists Iviyarium spaces, a facility for provision of laboratory supplies and washing glassware, a laboratory, and a complex of laborat onsisting of suites of enhancaboratories an aboratories (commonly referred to . I and signi?cant mechanical areas to support theso specialized laboratories and Vivarium. Work in th building includesmus aeusc 5252ail1~ I 'm[3i"342' S?giguse is desTgned to provide the maximum safety and security for infectious disease work. it is Tuberculosis (uivarium only] Rabies (vivalium only] home?! Ipmducingspecie 252mg: . 2 262al_h'; (MESH-2 .C Ibi[3::1E' 202301: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEH From: Henderson, Joseph Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:55 PM To: Chandler, George Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOJOSHE) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond. George (C m, ?1m: a Maxwell, James C. (CDCIDCCOKBFO) subject: RE arts?? Safety List George, I will he coordinating all of the responses working with program staff, and the Exec. Sec. Joseph M. Henderson Director, Of?ce of Security and Emergency Preparedness a Lead for the Consolidation of OSEP, Office of Sustainabilityand the Logistics Management Branch in FCC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) U. S. Department of Health and Human Services 404?63 9- 73131 Consoiidotion of OSHE. BFU. DEEP, the Office and Logistics Management Branch From: Chandler, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:54 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. (CDCKOCOOICSHE) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Mame?, James C. (CD 0} Bu?iect: Safety Joe, Paul and Jan: i understand that an overall POC for coordinating the Congressional response is In the meantime I would like to share the following with you. For Congressional Item we commented on Jan?s narrative (see below attachment). File: BFO comments esponse 6-26-12 yer 2.docx For Congressional Items 2, 3 and 4, we ask that OSHE review the following incident list to determine which fall into the "safety or biosafety incidents" that we should respond to and for which we need to provide documentation. Incinerator Stack (December 2007 covered under warranty GAO Report Lightning Strike ?(JL1ne 2007) Reliability Study (relating to Emergency Power) {April 2009) NIOSH Audit a (February 2012) SAT Reports (On going) (April 2009) Fire Alarm System (Repairs On going) Black out report (January 2012) Concord Safety Audit U30 99.00:? 10. Vivarium Project (December 2011) 11. Life Safety Battery Project (November 2009) 12. Bird Strike Georgia Power Substation Joe, the current range of engineering solutions for the Vivarioum Code luuse you requested at today?s meeting are below. Option ?1 is listed as a possibility since we still have an internal disagreement on whether or not there is an astual code violation and Jeff will issue an on this soon. We are evaluating the options in ltesm 2 and 3 below. Options: With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code. 50lbs, the doors are in compliance. I No action required If the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supva fan failure condition:lib}i3' 4-2 252301} I Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under 5lbr I Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. 0 Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the doorthese door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition: if we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. (by the way he doesn't reference the section of the code] then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; I On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. in Install VFD's that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. 0 install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEF) From: Henderson, Joseph Sent: Tuesday, .June 26, 2012 4:55 PM To: Chandler, George Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) . Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George (CD Maxwell, James C. Subject: RE: Safety List George, I will be coordinating all of the responses working with program staff, and the Exec. Sec. Joseph M. Henderson Director, China of Security and Emergency Preparedness 6: Lead for the Consolidation of of the Logistics Management Branch in PGO. Centers for Disease Controi and Prevention (CDC) U. S. Department of Heaith and Human Services 4045391131 Consoh'dationoDSHE BFCJ DEEP that) iced and to istics Mono ementEronch From: Chandler, George (CDCJOCOOJBFQ Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:54 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Maxwell, qugmgs C. (CD I I I giajeclz: Safety List Joe, Paul and Jan: I understand that an overall PUG for coordinating the Congressional response is In the meantime I would like to share the following with you. For Congressional Item We commented on Jan?s narrative (see below attachment). HE. 262mm ?IELBFacomrr-?ien-tsEI response 6-26-12 ver 2.docx For Congressional Items 2, 3 and 4, we ask that OSHE review the following incident list to determine which fall into the "safety or biosafety incidents? that we should respond to and for which we need to provide documentation. incinerator Stack (December 200? covered under warranty GAO Report Lightning Strike {June 2007) Reliability Study (relating to Emergency Power) (April 2009) NIOSH Audit - (February 2012) SAT Reports (On going) Q-Fever (April 2009} Fire Alarm System (Repairs On going) Black out report {January 2012} Concord Safety Audit innards-smear)? 1D. Vivarium Project (December 2011) 11. Life Safety Battery Project {November 2009) 12. Bird Strike Georgia Power Substation Joe. the current range of engineering solutions for the Vivarioum Code quse you requested at today?s meeting are below. Option 1 is listed as a possibility since we still have an internal disagreement on whether or not there is an actual code violation and Jeff will issue an on this soon. We are evaluating the options in Itesm 2 and 3 below. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. 0 No action required 2. If the Existing excegtions does not app! we have three door that may cause an issues in a sopva fan failure condition; ?2523ihi II Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under - Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. 0 Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will he in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. [bv the way he doesn?t reference the section of the code} then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; I On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 26. 2012 5:04 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Maxwell, James G. Subject: RE: Safety List Outstanding. and we?ll forward all materiais to you. From: Henderson, Joseph Sent: Tuesday, June26, 2012 4:55 PM To: Chandler, George Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Maxwell, James C. (CD glimpse? RE: 252alh': List George, I will be coordinating all of the responses working with program staff, and the Exec. Sec. Joseph M. Henderson Director, Office of Security and Emergency Preparedness Lead for the Consolidation of DSHE, BFO, OSEP, Office of and the Logistics Management'Branch in PGO. Centers for Disease Controi and Prevention (CDC) U.S. Department of Heaith and Human Services 404-639??131 Consoiidaa?on of DSHE, BFO, DSEP, the D?fice of and Logistics Management Branch From: Chandler, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:54 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Mame", James C. (corinr?nninrr) - Subject: FW: 5 Safety List Joe, Paul and Jan: I understand that an overall POC for coordinating the Congressional response is In the meantime i would like to share the following with you. For Congressional item we commented on Janis narrative (see below attachment) I'tl File: BFU comments is 42 response 5?26-12 yer 2.docx For Congressional items 2, 3 and 4, we ask. that OSHE review the following incident list to determine which fall into the ?safety or biosafety incidents" that we should respond to and for which we need to provide documentation. Ibili?? =12 Incinerator Stack (December 200? covered under warranty) GAO Report Lightning Strike - (June 2007} . Reliability Study (relating to Emergency Power) (April 2009) NIOSH Audit - (February 2012} sorts - (On going] 5252 . (April 2009] Fire Alarm System (Repairs On going) Black out report (January 2012} 9. Concord Safety Audit 1U. Vivarium Project (December 2011) 11. Life Safety Battery Project (November 2009) 12. Bird Strike Georgia Power Substation Joe, the current range of engineering solutions for the Vivarioum Code luuse you requested at today's meeting are below. Option 1 is listed as a possibility since we still have an internal disagreement on whether or not there is an actual code violation and Jeff will issue an on this soon. We are evaluating the options in ltesm 2 and 3 below. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. 0 No action required If the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure condition?ibn?d?USIC ?2-62a[h: I - Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under - Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. It Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. (by the way he doesn?t reference the section of the code) then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; - On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. I Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. I Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. 42 262th Ibh3142 Maths, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Chandler, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:04 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. Co: Williams. Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Maxwell, James C. Subject: Safety List Outstanding, and we'll forward all materials to you. From: Henderson, Joseph Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:55 PM To: Chandler, George Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Maxwell, James C. (CD 3) sirbiect:.. sew Safety List George, I will be coordinating all of the responses working with program staff, and the Exao. Sec. Joseph Ml. Henderson Director, Of?ce oi Security and Emergency Preparedness 8: Lead for the consolidation of OSHE, of Sustainability,ano' the Logistics Management Branch: in PGO. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) US. Department of Health and Human Services 404?639-2131 Consoiidotion of DSHE, BFD, DEEP, the Of?ce of Sustainability and PG tooistics Monooement Brooch From: Chandler, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:54 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. (CDCJOCOOIOSHE) Co: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Maxwell, James C. (CDC OCOO BFO) Safety List Joe, Paul and Jan: I understand that an overall POE: for coordinating the Congressional response is In the meantime I would like to share the following with you. For Congressional Item we commented on Jan's narrative (see below attachment)- 3523i? cs Files-BFO comments response 6?25?12 ver 2.docx be For Congressional Items 2. 3 and 4, we ask that OSHE review the following incident list to determine which fall into the ?safety or biosafety incidents" that we should respond to and for which we need to provide documentation. Incinerator Stack {December 200? covered under warranty GAO Report Lightning Strike - (June 2007) Reliability Study (relating to Emergency Power) (April 2009) NIOSH Audit - {February 2012) . SAT Reports - (On going} . 2009) Fire Alarm System (Repairs On going} Black otit report (January 2012) 9. Concord Safety Audit 10. Vivarium Project (December 2011) Life Safety Battery Project [November 2009) 12. Bird Strike Georgia Power Substation [Didi-1'2 LIE C. 262th3 Joe, the current range of engineering solutions for the Vivarioum Code luuse you requested at today?s meeting are below. Option ?1 is listed as a possibility since we still have an internal disagreement on whether or not there is an actual code violation and Jeff will issue an on this soon. We are evaluating the options in itesm 2 and 3 below. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, 50Ibs, the doors are in compliance. No action required 2. If the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure us cs candj?gn?m- I Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under - Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. I Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. (by the way he doesn?t reference the section of the code) then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. I Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. I Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. Maths. Chester (CDCJOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Sent: Wednesday, June 2012 6:21 AM To: Meechan, Paul .J. (CDCJOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George .. Fw: Safety List Paul, Can we get together this morning to discuss how we are going to compile this information otherwise Joe is going to be facing 100,000 pieces of paper? A little coordination between what we are pulling might help Joe. Also I need to know what you guys are classifying as a biosafety incident so we can find information that we might have that deals with that occurrence. I don't think it will take 15 minutes. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-639-3303 Office 404?639-0499 Fax From: Chandler, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:04 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Name", James C. (CDCJOCOOJBFO) assesses List Outstanding. and we'll forward all materials to you. G.- From: Henderson, Joseph (CDCIOCOOIDSEP) Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:55 PM To: Chandler, George Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOIOSHE) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Maxwell, James C. its-tsetse: RE: : Safety List lby3?42 252ann IhllE- 42 George, i will be coordinating all of the responses working with program staff. and the Exec. Sec. Joseph M. Henderson Director, Cities of Security and Emergency Preparedness . Lead for the Consolidation of USHEBFO, OSEP, Of?ce of Sustainabilityand the Logistics Management Branch in FCC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CD C) U. S. Department of Health and Human Services 404-639?7131 Consolidation of OSHE, DEEP, the Of?ce and P603 Logistics Management Branch From: Chandler, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:54 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. (CDCIOCOOIUSHE) Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Maxwell, James C. (CDC OCOO BFO) sili?ee: .Ew: Safety List Joe, Paul and Jan: I understand that an overall POC for coordinating the Congressional response is in the meantime I would like to share the following with you. For Congressional Item we commented on Jan's narrative (see- below attachment]. usc:? BFO co'rn'm'e n't's response 5-26-12 ver 2.docx rs: For Congressional Items 2, 3 and 4. we ask that OSHE review the following incident list to determine which fall into the "safety or biosafety incidents? that we should respond to and for which we need to provide documentation. 1. Incinerator Stack (December 2007 covered under warranty) 2. GAO Report Lightning Strike (June 200?) 3. Reliability Study (relating to Emergency Power] (April 2009] 4. NIOSH Audit - (February 2012) 5. SAT Re orts (On going} - (April 2009} 7. Fire Alarm System (Repairs On going) 8. Black out report (January 2012) 9. Concord Safety Audit Vivarium Project (December 2011] 11. Life Safety Battery Project (November 2009) 12. Bird Strike Georgia Power Substation Joe, the current range ofengineering solutions for the Vivarioum Code luuse you requested at today's meeting are beiow. Option 1 islisted as a possibility since we still have an internal disagreement on whether or not there is an actual code violation and Jeff will issue an on this soon. We are evaluating the options in ltesm 2 and 3 below. 2 Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, the doors are in compliance. - 'No action required 2. If the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply.r fan failure . I 0 Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under 5th 0 install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. I Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will he in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. (by the way he doesn't reference the section of the code) then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; a On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. 0 Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. 0 Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. Mathe, Chester From: Bowen, Ken L. Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 T26 AM To: Raynond Geor Subject: RE: 2,333,?? Didn?t you mean 50 lbs. in your response?? Typo? Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Office 404-639-3303 Office 404-639-0499 Fax From: Raymond, George (CDCXOCOOIBFO) Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:00 PM To: Chandler, George Williams, Jeffery BowenEgress Issues NSF-12 A stated earlier today FMEO did address the issue of the high pressure on the doors in 555m:- Vivarium. Paul sent an email to Jeff Williams on ?il20l20?i1 asking for and AHJ interpretation of the code. Upon no response, we (FMEO) viewed the letter of the code was applicable. The Commissioning report stated: ?the force required to open doors during supply tan failure does not meet the National Fire Protection Agency 101 Life Safety Handbook. The maximum allowable force per this Code in a means of egress is 15le The differential pressure measured across the egress door corresponds to a force greater than three times that amount {45lb0. As Paul stated in his email attached, this statement is incorrect. Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.23.9.1 it states; ?Smoke proof enclosures using stair pressurization shall use and approved engineered system with a design pressure difference across the barrier of not less than .05 in water column in sprinkle-red buildings or .1 in water column in nonsprinltlered buildings, and shall be capable of maintaining the pressure difference under likely ofstock e?ect or wind. The pressure d??ference across doors shall exceed that which allows the door to begin to open by a force of 30lb}c in accordance with 7.2.1.45? Per NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Section 7.2.1.4.5 it states; "The forces required to fully open any door manually in a means of egress shall not exceed 15lbf to release the latch, 30lbf to set the door in motion, and 15lbf to open the door to the minimum required width. Opening forces for the interior side-hinged or pivoted swinging door without closure shall not exceed Elbj?. These forces shall be applied to the latch stile.? 262ail1: "Exception No. 1: the opening force for existing doors in existing building shall not exceed 50be applied to the latch stile? Translations, it takes to engage the latch on the door, 30Ibf pounds to break the seal and set the door in motion, in and existing building), 15 pounds to fully open the door. Based on the number we received from the Test and Balance report dated 12/28/2010 and using a door closure force calculated by using normal operating conditions, the dooropening force was calculated as follows: Door calculation under supply fan failure operation Measured Based on this our worst door is over code. We will perform extensive test in this are the second week in July 2012. Options: 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, SOlbs, the doors are in compliance. 0 No action required If the Existligg exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may cause an issues in a supply fan failure . . b_:13_l:42 Adjust the door closure force. on these doors to under 5 bf - Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. - Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will he in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. If we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. {by the way he doesn?t reference the section of the code] then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; - On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. - Install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. 0 Install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. I: . . . . Message: FW: Vivarium Egress Message: FW: r3 42 Vivarium Egress LIEC- George K. Raymond Deputy Director Fecilih'es Winienonce and Engineering Q6353 Centersfor Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road, NW, MS: F434 Atlanta, GA 30333 Of?ce: 404.639.3335 Fax: 404.639.1635 Cell: 404.59 7.2599 3?5 Pfema the ermimn?zem bg?arg priming 22-23%! Ihh3142 262a-h?. 252mm will-:42 SE: i. 252all1: Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Bowen, Ken L. (CDCIOCOOIBFOJ Sent: Wednesday1 June 2012 To: Paul J. Cc: Bow=n Ken Lint" Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Subject: FW: - Safety List Paul. Can we get together this morning to discuss how we are going to compile this information oth Joe is going to be facing 100,000 pieces of paper? A little coordination between what we are pulling might help Also i need to know what you guys are classifying as a biosafety incident so we can ?nd information that we might have that deals with that occurrence. I don?t think it will take 15 minutes. Thanks, Ken Bowen Director for Facilities Engineering Of?ce 404-639-3303 Office 404-839-0499 Fax From: Chandler, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, um 5:04 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Nicholson, Janet Meechan, PaulJ. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Maxwell, James c. (cocxocoorBFO) Subgect: RE_:Safety List Outstanding, and we'll forward all materials to you. G.- From: Henderson, Joseph Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:55 PM To: Chandler, George Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Maxwell, James C. (CD I II O) s?iajact: RE: Safety List {bw3142 EBEsuh} zeasm leE'dz George, I will be coordinating all of the responses working with program staff. CDCIW and the Exec. Sec. Joseph M. Henderson Director, Office of Security and Emergency Preparedness 8: Lead for the Consolidation of OSHE, BF 0, OSEP, Cities of Sustainability, and the Logistics Management Branch in FCC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) U. S. Department of Health and Human Services 404-639-7131 Consoiidction of DSHE, BFO, DEEP, the Of?ce and PGD's tooistics Management Bron ch From: Chandler, George Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:54 PM To: Henderson, Joseph Nicholson, Janet Meechan, Paul J. Cc: Williams, Jeffery Bowen, Ken L. Raymond, George Harwell, James C. (CDC OCDD BFO) s?biectt..ew.: Safety List Joe, Paul and Jan: I understand that an overall POC for coordinating the Congressional response ls tn the meantime I would like to share the following with you. For Congressional item we commented on Jan?s narrative (see below attachment). us I: a set File: B'FO'tto'm'ments response 6-26-12 ver 2.docx For Congressional Items 2, 3 and 4, we ask that OSHE review the following incident list to determine which fall into the ?safety or biosafety incidents" that we should respond to and for which we need to provide documentation. Incinerator Stack - {December 200? covered under warranty GAO Report Lightning Strike (June 2007) Reliability Study (relating to Emergency Power] (April 2009) NIOSH Audit - (February 2012) SAT Reorts (On going) (April 2009) Fire Alarm System {Repairs On going) Black out report (January 2012) 9. Concord Safety Audit 10. Vivarium Project (December 2011) 11. Life Safety Battery Project (November 2009) 12. Bird Strike Georgia Power Substation LIE Joe, the current range of engineering solutions for the Vivarioum Code luuse you requested at today?s meeting are below. Option 1 is listed as a possibility since we still have an internal disagreement on whether or not there is an actual code violation and Jeff will issue an on this soon. We are evaluating the options in ltesm 2 and 3 below. 2 Options: I 1. With the current measurements, calculations and interpretation of the code using the Existing condition exception of the code, 50lbs, the doors are in compliance. I No action required 2. If the Existing exceptions does not apply, we have three door that may ca use an issues in a supply fan failure condition: US-E. 2523ch I I Adjust the door closure force on these doors to under Sibf I Install new door closure that will reduce the door closure pressure to an acceptable rate to allow the doors to meet code. install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assist in opening the door these door will be in compliance during a supply fan failure condition. 3. if we are going to assume that the commissioner interpretation of the code is correct. {by the way he doesn?t reference the section of the code) then to mitigate the problem we have the following options; On a supply fan failure shutdown all exhaust fans allowing the area to go neutral. install that will allow the exhaust fans to reduce their speed on a supply fan failure. install a door assist mechanism to mechanically assistin opening the door or relieving pressure across the door. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Browning, Daniel A. Sent: Tuesday, August 2012 To: Ms: u?wj" hester (CDCJOCOOIOSEP) Subieot: were Air Flow Reversal - 2010 August 8: Sept From: Probst, Paul E. Sent: August 01, 2012 9:37 PM To: Brow? Daniel A. Henderson, Joseph Subject: (3'54: ir Flow Reverse! 2010 August Sept 3" FW: A new CRN FW: P2009453 RE: P2009453 P2009453 New Re: P2009453 New REJ P2009453 FW: P2009453 number sagzopo. .. Automatic Door Rutomatic Don. .. Re: P2009453 Vivarium Scope P2009453 Progress RE: P2009453 RE: P2009453 RE: Vivarium Scope RE: 'u'ivan'um Scope Progress Progress Wat-[um Shutdown RE: Shutcher Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Sent: To: Go: Daniels, Charles I Subject: FW: A new CAN $5533.? US 5. Modi?cations. for Karen, Raymond. George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) Monday, August 02. 2010 7:49 AM Moss. Karen E. Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOIBFO) number has been assigned for Project - 2009453 - HVAC Can you forward the final scope of work for the project to Paul and myself. Per our meeting on 77282010, FMEO recommended that no changes be made to the current control sequence due to the fact that the current control strategy is working. We want to make sure we stay with this strategy and avoid adding more cost and complexity to the control system. From: ifms (CDC) Sent: Friday, July 30?r 2010 1:42 PM To: Raymond, George (CDCIOCOOIBFO) . i new CAN number has been assigned for Project - 2009453 - HVAC Modi?cations for EC 5 CAN number 9392DPD has been assigned for ProjectsE 2009453 - HVAC Modi?cations for??f U5 252nm, I CAN Request Information Request Date: 072?28/2010 Requester: Lingler, Arthur arlB Status: CAN Assigned Amount Requested: 670000 Please contact IFMS Sapport at 770-488-2773, if you need assistance. Mathe, Chester (CDCIOCOOIOSEP) From: Probst, Paul E. (CDCIOCOOKBFO) Sent: . Monday, August 09. 2010 4:0? PM I To: Walpole, Kenneth K. (CDCIOCOOIBFW Subject: FW: P2009453 FYI if interested. Went to P80 last Monday so we can assume still on schedule. Thanks, Paul 404-639-0505 From: Moss, Karen Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 8:50 AM To: Mickie, Lenore (CDCIOCOOKPGO) Cc: Harris, Teresa Daniels, Charles E. Tanya A. Lingler, Arthur R. Probst, Paul E. Raymond, George Milby, Stephen C. Subject: P2009453 Lenore, Please see attached RFC. ens 20 09453 #1201.de 2039 453 #3101.de Specifications. pdi Appendix.pdf TEMPLATE - Document Tracki. .. Best Regards, Karen Moss RE. Mechanical Engineer Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Design Engineering Management Of?ce 1600 Clifton Road NE. MS K-BT- Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Of?ce: Cell: 404?825?682? Fax: HID-4884667 email: Q0 odsgov CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL ANDPREVENTION Building and Facilities Office! Procurement and Grants Of?ce REQUEST FOR CONTRACT I PURCHASE ORDER Project Number: Project lilame: Period of Fc'rforinance: Status: Proposed AcquisitionStart Date: Independent Government I Estimate (IGE) fon'this Contract: IGE Total Budget for Project $676,500- CAN: Purpose of ContractjPO Contract Documents: Schedule of Deliverables: SuggestedSource for Solicitation: P2009453 HVAC Modi?cations October 2010through January 2011 Approved on July 23,1010 1 august-2:, 2010 $510,000 939ZDPD Construction contract Prepared in-house, to be transmitted electronically Yes, included in SOW 8(a) Set Aside sin-l..- E. . 313.1: . Date of 'C?ontracting ?f?cer?s I :I?echnical Representative. Training: I- Project. off requeStediContract: 3" Date of (:omractingOf?cer?s Technical Representative Project Description: Technical Evaluation Criteria: Karen Megs"; -. memo? 1 ?Emman- . .6 - A Change 2 2523 to clean 3352-55? NIA .. .. CALCULATIDN OF LIQUIDATED DAMAGES [one l242 0.103342 LIE ?252a l1l PROJECT: P2009453 0.5.0. 5 :52 WAC Modi?cations to LOCATIOI Reveal BY: KEM PROJECT NO: P2000453 BFO PERSONNEL PROJECT OFFICER Daily Project Administration (38-13 step 5 $03.26 .ihr 1.0 $63.26 {clay Weekly site visits (33-13 step? $63.25 ihr 4.0 $253.04 Per Diem $0.00 May .1: 0 :13ka $0.00 Air Fare $0.00 Iti'ip 0 $0.00 Rental Car $0.00 May it 0 $0.00 SUBTOTAL $253.04 5 $50.61 Joey TEAM LEADER site visits 63-14 step 5 a 804.75 3.0 $224.20 Ferdiem $0.00 May it 0 davsfmo $0.00 Air Fare $0.00 rtrip 0 tripslmo $0.00 . SUBTOTAL $224.20 I 22 $10.10 idav SECRETARY ss-s steps $20.99 1.0 hrsr?dev $26.90 Idav BFO supplies, phone at postage $4.20 May PGO PERSONNEL CONTRACT SPECIALIST Daily Project Administration (38-13 step 5 $53.26 1.0 hrsidav $03.20 Ida}! Weekly site visits G343 step 5 IE $53.25 2.0 hreiwlt $125.52 Per Diem (Q $0.00 {day at 0 clevst $0.00 Air Fare $0.00 {trip at 0 $0.00 Rental Car $0.00 ldav 0 $0.00 SUBTOTAL $126.52 I 5 $25.30 {day CONTRACTING OFFICER site visits . G344 step 5 $7436 Mr 3.0 hrSIrno $224.28 Per Diem . $0.00 Ida}! 0 davsimo $0.00 Air Fare $0.00 Itrip 0 tipslmo $0.00 SUBTOTAL $224.20 {22 $10.10 relay SECRETARY GS-S step5 (a $26.99 Ihr 0.5 $13.50 iday PGO supplies. phone a postage $5.00 may TOTAL DAMAGES $212.51 relay Government personnel oosts calculated using Civilian Position Full Fringe Bene?t Cost Factor from OMB Circular No. "Performance of Commercial Activities" and 0PM 2010' hourly wage table for Atlanta Both web pages access ed 1002010. 2:55 pm. There are 5 working days in a week. There are approximately 22 working days in an average month (based on approximately 261 weekdays in a year). Page 2975 use. 252mm Page 2976 {jmtja'az-u 1.1.3.0. 262a(h} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED Sensitive But Unclassified information must be protected from general release to the public. 830- information, both hard copy and electronic 3formats, should be physically protected and storedibin limited areas. . - This document contains information that may be exempt from public release under the Freedom of Information Act USC 552], Exemption(s) #3 apply. Approval by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Document Control Of?cer, Of?ce of Security and Emergency Preparedness. and the CDC FOIA ICthicerI prior to the public release via the FOIA Of?ce is required. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED USE. 262301} . SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CD 2 3 SECTION 00010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title SERIES 0 DOCUMENTS 00001 Cover Sheet 00010 Table of Contents DIVISION 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 01010 Summary of Work 01039 Coordination and Meetings 01090 Reference Standards 01300 Submittals 01311 Networtr Analysis 01351 Sustainable Project Requirements 01400 Quality Control Procedures 01500 Temporary Facilities and Controls 01546 Health and Safety 01547 Personnel Security Requirements 01700 Contract Closeout 01710 Cleaning DIVISION 2 - SITE CONSTRUCTION 02225 Minor Demolition for Remodeling DIVISION 4 - MASONRY 04065 Masonry Mortar and Grout 04810 Unit Masonry Assemblies DIVISION 7' - THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION 07900 Joint Sealers DIVISION 8 - DOORS AND WINDOWS 08115 Standard Steel Frames 08225 Fiberglass Reinforced Polyester (FRP) Doors 08710 Door Hardware DIVISION 9 - FINISHES 09T21 Methyl Methacrylale (MMA) Acrylic Flooring 09900 Paints and Coatings SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ Ser?tLion 00010-1 Table of Contents 0113-12 USE: 5; EBZarlil CDC P2009453 I I MODIFICATIGNS F0 RI .. I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEIU) DIVISION 10 - SPECIALTIES 1 0260 Metal Wall Guards DIVISION 15 - MECHANICAL 15050 15080 150?5 15080 15120 15180 15752 15310 15840 Basic Mechanical Materials and Methods Variable Frequency Drives and Controls Mechanical Identi?cation Mechanical Insulation Piping Specialties Heating and Cooling Piping Air Coils Ducts Air Terminal Units Appendix?. Drawing and Mechanical Cutsheets END OF SECTION SENSITIVE sur UNCLASSIFIED (see) Section 000102 Table of Contents coc P2009453 I 262301} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SectionO?I 010-1 Summary of Work SECTION 01010 SUMMARY OF WORK FOR SOLUTION ORDER CONCEPT (SOC) PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. This section includes the followingScope of Work. Work by the Government. Government Furnished Products. Contractor use of site and premises. Work Sequence. Government occupancy. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Related sections include the following: Section 01300 - Submittats Section 01311 - Network Analysis Schedules Section 01546 - Health and Safety Section 01.547 - Personnel Security Requirements Section 01 mo - Project Closeout 1.3 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD A. Project Delivery Method: The method of delivery forthis project is a Solution Order Concept The SOC is characterized by the following elements: 1. The SOC is a process that does not utilize conventional design services. thereby empowering the Contractor to become very involved in the project's earliest stages. The Contractor. as a team member with CDC. will be expected to provide suggestions, ask questions. and offer potential alternative methods. systems. or products to the Scope of Work (SOW) provided by CDC. The SOC process is batted on CDC and the Contracwr meeting at the site. reaching consensus on the scope. schedule. and cost of the project. confirming all agreements in writing. awarding the contract. and executing the work. Site Visit. The purpose of the site visit is to convey CDC's technical objectives for the project (30W) to the Contractor and to be a working meeting that moves the team closer to the final definition of the project's scope. While all systems. materials. and issues may not be selected or settled during this site visit. all known issues should be revealed and discussed. a. Required Attendees: Contractor's Project Manager and Superintendent: each major trade sub contractor's Project Manager; CDC Contracting Of?cer; CIMO (andfor DEMO) Project Menagerie). design discipline experts. COTR. and Building Manager; program and appropriate support personnel from OHS. ITSO. OSEP. and similar programs. b. A follow up site meeting may be appropriate if additional information or clari?cation is required. - PGO Request for Proposal. After the SOW has been re?ned. PGO will send the Solicitation. Otter: and Award document and attachments to the Contractor for pricing. Contractor?s Proposal. The Contractor?s proposal includes a schedule. scope. cost. and submittal materials as appropriate and required in the SOW to provide a solution to the requirements de?ned by the SOW and other components of the Solicitation. The following are technical SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) 42 . E2 bait SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 Section01010-2 - Hyactuo Foe-7 - - -- Summary of Work requirements for the initial proposal to be submitted to the Contracting Of?cer (also refer to Section 01300): a. Demonstrate compliance with the sow. b. Cost for the work and services broken down by building and detailed down to the trade by work activity, nomber of labor hours, and hourly costs. c. Equipment and material cut sheets, shop drawings, and productdata, including MSDS sheets as appropriate. d. Provide alternatives fro consideration by CDC as appropriate. a. Construction schedule of activities. This would include necessary utility outages with duration estimates. B. Technical Evaluation. The technical evaluation by CDC will include, but may not be limited to. the following: 1. Veri?cation of compliance with the SOW. 2. Acceptance or rejection of Equipment and Materials submittals. 3. Acceptance or rejection of required submittals, shop drawings, samples, and all other information required by the SOW. 4. Evaluation of Construction Activity Schedule. 5. Cost proposal. C. Award. The criteria for award are contained in the Scticftation, Offer; and Award document and attachments as issues by the Contracting Officer for this project. Upon receipt of the contract, the Contractor shall execute any other non-site speci?c requirements of the contract, such as ordering items with long lead times, shop fabrication of assemblies, initiation of shop drawings and other submittals processes, update or partial short circuit and coordination study (if required), and all other activities to insure the project shall be completed according to the project scope, cost, and schedule. O. Notice to Proceed. The information in this paragraph in no way supersedes, negates. or de?nes the requirements contained in the Sol'icita'tr'on, Offer, and Award document issued by the Contracting Officer for this project. 1. Upon receipt of all requirements in the Soticftaticn, Offer, and Award document relating to award of Notice to Proceed (NTP), the Contracting Of?cer will, at the preconstruction meeting with the Contractor, issue the NTP with the following understanding that the Contractor shall do the following activities: a. Proceed with preparation of submittals. shop drawings, project schedule, and other similar requirements in the contract. b. Not be allowed on site until the requirements of Section 0154? Personnat Security have been ful?lled for the Contractor's Project Manager and Superintendent. c. Provide the requirements of the Preliminary Outline Schedule in Section 01311 Network Anatysis Schedtties at the preconstruction meeting. d. Commence personnel security process on remaining staff for project. a. Not be allowed to commence work on site until the Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan has been approved by the Contracting Of?cer. 1.4 DESCRIPTION OF WORK A. The Work of this project comprises certain repairs and improvements to the existing interior of Building 13 located at Roybal campus. These repairs and improvements include, but are not limited to, the following aspects as further de?ned and described in the Contract Documents: SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION coc P2009453 SENSFFIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section?l 01 0-3 Summary of Work Mechanical 1. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 13. 19. 20. 21. Tap into the side of the existing 7?2 14 supply ductworlt in interstitial space and route new ductwork to new pneumatic phoenix supply valve. See appendix for duct lay out and phoenix valve selection. Contractor to ?eld verify ?t and routing of new ductwork with existing conditions. Route all main ductwork as high as possible. Transition from new phoenix valve outlet to 26 18 heating coil. See appendix for attached heating coil selection. Core slab penetrations as shown on attached sketch and per architectural and structural requirements. Slab penetration locations to be determined by nondestructive testing. Nondestructive testing to be done on the ?rst day of the lab shut down to verify that no conduit is in the slab at proposed openings. Nondestructive testing to be done under separate CDC contract. Route new ductwork from the new phoenix valve through these new slab penetrations to new supply air diffusers in the corridor. Provide out of floor ?re damper Ruskin Model DIDBZO (Type BC) in interstitial before slab penetration. install per manufacturer and SMACNA ?re damper out of walilfioor installation instructions. Diffusers shall be 24 10; Titus model number SDORS-SS. Provide manual opposed blade volume damper (Titus ACE-95) in the interstitial at duct branch take off slab penetration. Provide gas tight bubble damper at each diffuser. Tap into existing hot water supply and return pipes and route new 1" pipes to new reheat coil. Provide new hot water two way control valve to match existing control valves at existing heating coils. Provide all associated controls and devices to make a complete supply system. insulate supply ductwork and hot water pipe. All devices. materials and equipment to match existing unless speci?ed otherwise. Provide missing opposed blade balancing dampers on existing duchvork as identi?ed by baseline Test and Balance Report. Provide new temperature sensor in exhaust duct to phoenix valve 8-154 to control new heating coil. Provide paintable silicone to seal diffusers in corridor. Remove existing exhaust grille in elevator lobby room to pressurize space and patch per architectural requirements. Replace two counterbalanced isolation dampers all I Opunterbaiance dampers to be sized and selected by fan manufacturer. Contractor to ?eld verify dimensions before ordering dampers. Replace two low leakage motorized bypass dampers all I Bypass dampers to be sized and selected by ten manufacturer. Contractor to field verify dimensions before ordering. Provide motor sheaves for fans if required by Test and Balance after construction and during commissioning. Tap into existing exposed elbow and add new stainless steel thermal double wall 12 10 supply ductwork in shower anieroorn, route to new 12 12 diffuser; Titus Model number 300RS-SS with opposed blade balancing damper. Contractor to ?eld verify existing conditions for location and ?t of ductwork and diffuser. Test and Balance of exhaust and supply systems in the contract. use. 262arn} U.S.C. 262801} [b}[3}242 U.S.C. 2628 fl'r'l to be done under separate Near the end of construction Test and Balance will perform preliminary fan SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION iseui CDC P2009453 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI HVAC MODIFICATIONS FOR 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. ,Wlw f: 2523?? will?? SectionO1 01041 i" i I15 sisal-it; I Summary ofWork insulation on ductwork and pipe for all pipe and ductwork related to Identify location of is plugs for future. [b19242 LIELC. 2s2arm Seal air leakage at existing six fire dampers located in the interstitial that serves the clean corridors. Contractor to provide drawings. Provide shop drawings. and submittals via hard copy and electronically. Contractor shall provide detailed sheet metal and pipe shop drawings for CDC approval. Glass slot size shall be veri?ed with CDC before ordering glass. Control Work 1. Modify existing two position control dampers to a modulating damper. Damper will modulate in unison with existing replaced control damper to control duct static pressure. Control Sequence shall be as follows: 1. Fans shall be automatically startedfstopped by the BAS system. Fans shall operate 24 hoursrday. daysrweek once sequenced on. 2. switch for each fan shall be monitored. If HOA switch is positioned in the off or hand pos?ion, an alarm shall be generated. 3. Fan status shall be monitored by a current switch. 4. During fan operation. BAS system shall modulate both control dampers located at the roof exhaust plenum in unison to maintain exhaust static pressure setpoint. Initial setpoint shall be TAB Company to determine final setpoint. 5. On a fan failure as sensed by one of the two current switches, an alarm shall be sent. Exhaust plenum control dampers shall continue to modulate maintaining exhaust duct static pressure setpoint. B. On failure of both fans as sensed by either current switches an alarm shall be generated. Upon drop in exhaust duct static below (adj) below setpoint, an alarm shall be generated. On a drop in exhaust duct static pressure 1.0" (adj) below setpoint. an alarm shall be generated. 3. On a drop in exhaust duct static pressure below 1.5? (adi) associated AHU shall stop. 9. Upon failure of (associatedwith exhaUst fansl mien-miss. sz?zarm as sensed by ?no? airflow at the airflow station, exhaust fans more us c. 252mm exhaustplenum control dampers shall modulate to maintain 1m}; exhaust duct static. If [ow duct static cannot be maintained. BIAS system shall stopIUsc; ?252a and dampers witl modulate to maintain static setpoint. 10. Smoke control shall continue to function as currently programmed. 11. Fireman's override panel shall continue to function as currently programmed. Architectural m3 1. Remove door $25an and ?ll opening with concrete masonry. Finish wall with epoxy paint. 2. Provide new window in new in?ll wall. 3. Provide new concrete masonry wall in Corrido. Install new automatic opening FRP swing door in new masonry wali. Install metai wall guards at masonry wall. Finish wall with epoxy paint. 4. Remove existing directional air flow devices from approximately 33 doors. Install manufacturer supplied caps to resulting penetrations in walls.Provide new rubber door sweepst'bottoms to approximately 12 doors. 5. Remove existing vision glass from approximately 30 doors. Replace with new glass sized to leave air gaps in doors. 6. Provide new full gasket sets to three sets of doors. Resulting door assemblies to seal to gas-tight condition when closed. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION coc P2009453 I (system uses 2623(h} I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Sectio n01 01 0-5 Summary of Wont WORK BY THE GOVERNMENT A. The Government has a direct contract with the test and balance ?rm. CDC will also decontaminate the area prior to commencement of work in the animal area and after completion of work. No other work by CDC is anticipated for this Project. 1.5 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PRODUCTS A. No products or materials will be furnished by the Government for this Project. 1.6 CONTRACTOR USE OF SITE AND PREMISES A. Limit use of site and premises to allow: 1. Regular and continued use of. and access to. immediate area around Buildings 15. 16. 18. 21. and 23. adjacent walkways and CDC parking area. Construction Operations: Limit construction operations to the areas noted on drawings. Government security at CDC facilities requires that the Contractor and all agents remain in the area designated by the limit of work in the Contract Documents. Failure to observe this requirement is grounds for dismissal of the offending party. Repeated violations may be grounds for dismissal of the Contractor. or agent at fault. or both. 1. Contractors on exterior projects shall not be allowed access to the interior of any CDC building. except to perform work scheduled in an interior space. Time Restrictions for Performing Work: All Work which cannot be performed during normal duty hours shall require the Contractor to submit a schedule of anticipated Work to the Contracting Of?cer prior to execution of the Work. This includes utility outages. work on Federal holidays. and other activities. Known activities include the following: 1. Utility Outages and Shutdown: The Contractor shall arrange with the Contracting Of?cer. Utility outages and associated work shall be scheduled from 6:00 pm to 6:00 am. Monday through Thursday. or 6:00 pm, Friday. to 6:00 am. Monday. The Contractor shall request such outages a minimum of 10 days prior to shutdown. There shall be no exceptions to the 10 day minimum requirement. 2. Work on Weekends. Federal holidays and other requests: The Contractor shall arrange with the Contracting Of?cer. The Contractor shall provide such request a minimum of 5 days prior to scheduled Work. Site Conditions: The Contractor. shall upon completion of the Work. repair. aiter. remove. andtor replace exterior materials to conform to each material?s condition prior to commencement of work. Project Cleanup and Closeout. An amount equal to 10% of the contract amount. including all modi?cations. will be held by the Contracting Of?cer until all project cleanup and closeout requirements have been performed by the Contractor and acceptable to the Contracting Of?cer. 1. Project cleanup and closeout issues that the Contractor shall be responsible for include. but are not limited to. the following: a) Removal of all debris. excess materials, and equipment brought on site by the Contractor or SENSITIVE eur UNCLASSIFIED mronmnou (seui SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 WW, I I at: 0-6 HVAC MODIFICATIONS FORI Summary ofWork any agent. of the Contractor. b) Removal, replacement, or refurbishment as required of all Government utilities used during execution of the work. c} Submission and resubmission if required, of all closeout documents required by this project. These include resolution of final inspection listing, operating and maintenance manuals, staff training, warranty information, as?buill documents, and others as listed in the relevant specification sections. Prior to Final Acceptance, the Contractor shall request a review of these issues by the Contracting Officer. Upon successful completion of the review, and when all defective issues have been resolved to the satisfaction of the Contracting Officer, the affected funds will be released. Limit use of site and premises to allow: 1. Government occupancy of the building. 2. Use of site and adjacent spaces by the Government and the public for normal daily operations and functions. GOVERNMENT (USER) OCCUPANCY A. Pepple (CDC employeesfvisitors) in Building Elm" occupy its premises, including but not limited to the project area, during the entire period of construction. Contractor is to keep in consideration the access and egress needs of these occupants. B. Cooperate with the Government, represented bythe Contracting Officer, to minimize conflict, and to facilitate the daily operations of Building Elsa well as other buildings and facilities on the Roybal Campus. C. Schedule the Work to accommodate this requirement. 1.8 DOCUMENT SECURITY A. Document security is important to the Government. The documents provided to you in anyfonnat are sensitive and you must take provisions to protect the confidentiality of the information. The requlrements below are intended to supplement CDC's current documents security policy. By acceptance of any printed or electronic documents, you agree to the following: 1. The documents shall not be transmitted to a third party without written permission of the Contracting Officer. Referto Part 2 of this speci?cation section forthe Document Tracking Log. 2. All documents shall be returned at the conclusion of the project. No documents shall be kept for any purpose by you, your firm. or any of your subcontractors, suppliers, or agents. Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. 3. All electronic files shall be deleted from storage devices (computers, zip drives, hand held devices, and such). Documentation certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. All and magnetic disk shall be returned to the Contracting Of?cer. Documentation i certifying compliance with this provision is required at the conclusion of the project. All devices that contain electronic information shall be protected by password. All printed documents shall be stored in a secure area until returned to the Contracting Of?cer. Return of all required documents and media shall be part of the project?s completion and closeout requirements, and shall be satisfactorily completed prior to approval of final invoice. 1.9 GOVERNMENT USE OF THE SITE SENSITIVE eur UNCLASSIFIED (as CDC P2009453 HVAC FORIibirsjzi2 use. 262arh} I A. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATFON (SBUJ Section01010-7 Summary of Work Interior: The following is a brief description of Government use of the site that may have varying effects on the execution of the Work required under this contract. 1. The req ments and demands for Government operations, schedules. and programs in Building will continue to occur throughout the construction period. Response to these requirements and demands will be met by the Government in spaces adjacent to the project area. Therefore, it is very critical that construction activities for this project. including workers. equipment, and materials. have minimal potential for disruption to Government activities in the spaces adjacent to the project location. Notify and coordinate with project of?cer when interior occupants could be affected by exterior work activities. Exterior: The following is a brief description of Govemment use of the site that may have varying effects on the execution of the Work required under this contract. 1. The operation and function of the adjacent buildings and spaces will continue during the construction period of this project. Pedestrians. vehicles, equipment. and goods will continue to be present in adjacent exterior spaces to the construction site. A schedule of Contractor vehicular movement of dumpsters. deliveries, and other similar issues shall be provided to the Contracting Of?cer for approval to maintain safety and minimize disruptions and con?icts to all parties. Activities conceming placement of dumpsters and storage 8. removal of hazardous materials. will only be executed after guidance from the Project Of?cer. The Contractor shall provide a delivery schedule of all equipment and materials to the Contracting Officer at least 10 calendar days prior to the earliest scheduled delivery that requires the use of the loading dock. The Contracting Of?cer will coordinate Government use of the loading dock with Contractor requests and accommodate such requests to the greatest extent possible. 1.10 CONTRACTOR ACTIONS UPON NOTICE OF CONTRACT AWARD A. The information in this paragraph in no way supercedes, negates, or defines the requirements contained in the Contract. Unless otherwise speci?cally addressed with different requirements in the Contract terms and conditions. the Contractor shall immediately initiate the following actions upon receipt of the Notice of Award: 1. Ful?ll requirements of Section 0154? Personnel Security Requirements for the Contractor=s Superintendent and Project Manager. The Contractor will not be allowed on site until these requirements are met. The Government will not be responsible nor liable for any delays to the Work for the Contractor's inability or failure to obtain timely clearances or suf?cient numbers of cleared personnel. Prepare and submit to the Contracting Officer the required Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan. The Contractor will not be allowed to commence work on site until the Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan has been approved by the Contracting Of?cer. Any delays caused by the Contractor's failure to obtain an approved Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan shall be attributed to the Contractor and shall not be considered an excusable delay. Take action and complete all effort necessary to produce and present the Preliminary Outline Schedule in 01311 Nehvorlr Analysis Schedules at the preconstruction meeting. The Contractor shall be considered delinquent in performance if these documents are not ready for presentation at the preconstruction meeting. Commence personnel security process on project's workers. Proceed with preparation of submittals, shop drawings, and other similar requirements of the contract. Anticipate receiving formal Notice to Proceed from the Contracting Of?cer within 23 calendar SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (sew SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 Section01 0113-8 HVAC MODIFICATIONS ?2523"? Summary of Work clays after Notice of Award. it Is customary, but not required, forthe Contracting Of?cer to issue Notice to Proceed at the preconstruction meeting. PART 2 PRODUCTS A. Document Tracking Log. Attachment is the form to be used upon approval by the Contracting Of?cer of request to provide documents to a third party. TEMPLATE - ocurrenl: Tracking PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SELF) CDC P2009453 HVAC MODIFICATIONS FOFEI SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 01039-1 Coordination and Meetings USC. 2-62aih} i? SECTION 01039 COORDINATION AND MEETINGS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1_ A. B. 1.2 1.3 SECTION INCLUDES Coordination. Progress meetings. COORDINATION Coordinate scheduling. submittals. and Work of the various sections of speci?cations to assure ef?cient and orderly sequence of installation of interdependent construction elements. with provisions for accommodating items to be installed later. Verify that utility requirement characteristics of operating equipment are compatible with building utilities. Coordinate work of various sections having interdependent responsibilities for installing. connecting to. and placing in service such equipment. Coordinate space requirements and installation of mechanical and electrical work which are indicated diagrammatically on Drawings. Follow routing shown for pipes. ducts. and conduit as closely as practicable; place runs parallel with line of building. Utilize spaces ef?ciently to maximize accessibility for other installations. for maintenance. and for repairs. Coordinate completion and clean up of Wont of separate sections in preparation for project completion. After the Government occupancy of premises. coordinate access to site for correction of detective work and Work not in accordance with Contract Documents. to minimize disruption of Govemment?s activities. PROGRESS MEETINGS Schedule and administer meetings with the Contracting Of?cer throughout progress of the Work at minimum weekly intervals. Make arrangements for meetings. prepare agenda with copies for participants. preside at meetings. record minutes. and distribute copies within him days to Contracting Of?cer. participants. and those affected by decisions made. Attendance Required: Job superintendent. Contractor's Project Manager. Contracting Of?cer, Project Of?cer. and others as appropriate to agenda topics for each meeting. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBIJI CDC P2009453 Section 01039-2 HVAC MODIFICATIONS FOR Wm? I Coordination and Meetings 13. Agenda: Review minutes of previous meetings. Review of Work progress. Field observations, problems. and decisions. identi?cation of problems which impede planned progress. Review of submittals schedule and status of submittals. Review of oft-site fabrication and delivery schedules. Updated progress schedule. Corrective measures to regain projected schedule. Planned progress during succeeding work period. Review of next two weeks scheduled work based on printed partial schedule given out during meeting. Coordination of projected progress. Maintenance of quality and work standards. Effect of proposed changes on progress schedule and coordination Safety Other business relating to Work. 4997495?? A 919-995?. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ (mom uses 262aih} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) PART 1 GENERAL coc P2009453 01090-1 . I Reference Standards SECTION 01090 REFERENCE STANDARDS 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. Quality assurance. B. Schedule of references. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Applicable Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses. 1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Dualityr assurance includes. but is not limited to. the following activities and requirements: 93 For products or workmanship speci?ed by association. trades. or Federal Standards, comply with requirements of the standard. except when more rigid requirements are speci?ed or are required by applicabie codes. Conform to reference standard by date of issue current on date for receiving bids. Obtain copies of standards when required by Contract Documents or when needed for compliance with Contract requirements. Maintain cepy at jobsite. Should speci?ed reference standards con?ict with Contract Documents. request clari?cation from Contracting Of?cer before proceeding. Contract Documents take precedence where there is con?ict between reference standards and said Contract Documents. 1.4 SCHEDULE OF REFERENCES ACI American Concrete Institute AGC Associated General Contractors of America AISC American Institute of Steel Construction ANSI American National Standards Institute APA American Plywood Association ASHRAE American Society of Heating. Refrigerating. and Air?Conditioning Engineers ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials AWI Architectural Woodwork institute AWPA American Wood Presewers' Association AWS American Welding Society AWWA American Water Works Association BHMA Builders Hardware Manufacturers Association Cast Iron Soil Pipe institute CTI Ceramic Tile Institute of America DHI Door and Hardware Institute ETL ETL Testing Laboratory. Inc. FM Factory Mutual System SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) [DiiEi =13 U5 coo P2009453 HVAG FS GA MES NEC NEMA NFPA NPCA OSHA PDCA PS SEIC SDI SDI SJI SMACNA SPIB TCA UL PART 2 PRODUCTS Not Used PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION 01090-2 Reference Standards Federal Speci?cation Gypsum Association Institute of Electrical and Electronics Manufacturer Standardization Society of the Valves and Fittings Industry National Electric Code National Electrical Manufacturers' Association National Fire Protection Association National Paint and Coatings Association Occupational Safety and Health Administration Portland Cement Association Painting and Decorating Contractors of America Product Standard Standard Building Code Steel Deck Institute Steel Door Institute Steel Joist Institute Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors National Association Southern Pine Inspection Bureau Tile Council of America Underwriters LaboratoriesI Inc. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE EIUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION 252301} CDC P2009453 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 01300-1 Submittals SECTION 01300 SUBMITTALS PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 A. 1.2 1.3 SUMMARY Section Includes: 1. Preparing and processing of submittals for review and action. 2. Preparing and processing of informational submittals. Submit the following for the Contracting Of?cer?s review and action: Shop drawings. Structural design information required by the contract documents. Product data. Samples. Submittals indicated as "for approval." Submit the following as informational submittals: ?l Certi?cates. 2. Reports. 3. Quali?cation statements for manufacturers?nstallers. 4 Submittals indicated as "for information only." 5 Submittals for which procedures are not de?ned elsewhere. Speci?c submittais required are described in individual sections. 1. Provide other information required by Section 01546. 2. Provide other information required by Section 0154?. DEFINITIONS "Shop drawings" are drawings and other data prepared. by the entity that is to do the work. speci?cally to show a portion of the work. "Product data submittals" are standard printed data which show or otherwise describe a product or system. or some other portion of the work. 1. Product data submittals also include: a. Performance curves. when issued by the manufacturer for all products of that type. b. Selection data showing standard colors. c. Wiring diagrams, when standard for all products of that type. "Samples" are actual examples of the products or work to be installed. lnfonnationai Submittals: Submittals identi?ed in the contract documents as to be submitted for information only. FORM OF SUBMITTALS Sheets Larger Than 3-12 inches by 14 inches: 1. Maximum sheet size: 36 inches by 48 inches. a.Exception: Full size pattern or template drawings. 2. Number of copies: a. Submittals for review: 1) One correctable reproducible print. not folded and 5 copies of blue- or black?line print(s). SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) MW coo ezoos4ss Section 01 soc?2 2523'?; . I Submi?als 2) Reproducible and 2 copies will be returned. b. Informationaisubmittals: 1) 3 copies of opaque prints. 2) No copies will be returned. 8. Small Sheets or Pages: 1. Minimum sheet size: 8-112 inches by 11 inches. 2. Maximum sheet size for opaque copies: B?tfz inches by 14 inches. 3. Number of copies: a. Transparencies: Same as for larger sheets. b. Opaque copies: 1) For review: 5 copies. I a) 3 copies will be retained. 2) Informational submittals: 3 copies .0 Samples: 4 sets of each. 2 sets will be returned. D. If additional sets are needed by other entities involved in work represented by the samples, submit with original submittal. E. Copies in excess of the number requested will not be returned. . F. Provide additional copies, if required for operating and maintenance data, marked to indicate their purpose. G. Provide additional copies for project record documents. H. Submittals requiring professional stamp andfor signature shall be provided in original form in addition to the necessary number of copies. All originals will be retained by the Government. 1.4 COORDINATION OF SUBMITTALS A. Coordinate submittals and activities that must be performed in sequence, so thatthe Contracting Of?cer has enough information to properly review the submittals. B. Coordinate submittals of different types for the same product or system so that the Contracting Officer has enough information to properly review each submit-tel. PART 2 - PRODUCTS (NOT USED) PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 TIMING OF SUBMITTALS A. Transmit each submittal at or before the time indicated on the approved schedule of submittals. 1. Prepare and submit for approval a list of submittals and a schedule showing the required dates of submittal of all submittals. Organize the schedule by the applicable specification section number. Incorporate the contractor?s construction schedule speci?ed elsewhere. Submit within 45 days after commencement of the work. Revise and resubmit the schedule for approval when requested. meww BLJT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI CDC P2009453 HVAC 3.2 SENSITWE BUT UNCLASSIFIED team Section 01300-3 Submittals Deliver each submittal requiring approval in time to allow for adequate review and processing time. including resubmittals if necessary; failure of the Contractor in this respect will not be considered as grounds for an extension of the contract time. Deliver each informational submittal prior to start of the work involved, unless the submittal is of a type which can not be prepared until after completion of the work; submit If a submittal must be processed within a certain time in order to maintain the progress of the work. state so clearly on the submittal. Allow a minimum of 10 business days for the ?rst processing of each submittal. Allow more time when submittals must be coordinated with later subm'rttals. Allow a minimum of 5 business days for processing of resubmittals. SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES GENERAL Contractor Review: Sign transmittal form for each submittal certifying compliance with the requirements of the contract documents. Notify the Contracting Of?cer. in writing and at time of submittal. of all points upon which the submittal does not conform to the requirements of the contract documents. if any. Do not commence work which requires review of any submittais until receipt of returned submittals with an acceptable action. Do not allow submittals without an acceptable action marking to be used for the project. Do not submit substitute items that have not been approved by means of the procedure specified elsewhere. Do not include requests for substitution {either direct or indirect] on submittals; comply with procedures for substitutions speci?ed elsewhere. Preparation of Submittals: 1. Label each copy of each submittal. with the following information: Project name. Date of submittal. Contractors name and address. Contracting Of?cer?s name and address. Subcontractors name and address. Supplier?s name and address. Manufacturer?s name. Speci?cation section where the submittal is speci?ed. Numbers of applicable drawings and details. Other necessary identifying information. 2. Pack submittals suitably for shipment. 3. Submittals to receive Contracting Of?cer's action marking: Provide blank space on the label or on the submittal itself for action marking; minimum 4 inches wide by 5 inches high. residences! Transmittal of Submittals: 1. Submit all submittais to the Contracting Of?cer. 2. Submittals will be accepted from the Contractor only. Submittals received from other entities will be returned without review or action. 3. Submittals received without a transmittal form will be returned without review or action. SENSITWE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEIUone P2009453 Section 01300?4 ear. HVAC. MODIFICATIONS FORI - Subminals 4. Transmittal form: Use a form acceptable to the Government; provide space on form for: Project name. Submittal date. Transmittal number. Speci?cation section number. To: From: Contractor?s name. Subcontractors and supplier's names. Manufacturer?s name. Submittal type (shop drawing. product data1 sample. informational submittal}. Description of submittal. Records of distribution. Action marking. The Contractor's certification signature. . Comments. it] out a separate transmittal form for each submittal; also include the following: Other relevant information. Requests for additional information. a res-?ate We as as 110;: are 3.3 SHOP DRAWINGS A. Content: Include the following information: Dimensions, at accurate scale. All ?eld measurements that have been taken, at accurate scale. Names of specific products and materials used. Details, identified by contract document sheet and detail numbers. Show compliance with the specific standards referenced. Coordination requirements; show relationship to adjacent or critical work. Name of preparing ?rm. reparation: Reproductions of contract documents are not acceptable as shop drawings. Copies of standard printed documents are not acceptable as shop drawings. Identify as indicated for all submittais. Space for.Contracting Officer?s action marking shall be adjacent to the title block. 3.4 PRODUCT DATA A. Submit all product data submittais for each system or unit of work as one submittal. El. Content: Submit manufacturer?s standard printed data sheets. Identify the particular product being submitted; submit only pertinent pages. Show compliance with properties speci?ed. identify which options and accessories are applicable. Include recommendations for application and use. Show compliance with the speci?c standards referenced. Show compliance with specified testing agency listings; show the limitations of their labels or seals, if any. Identify dimensions which have been verified by field measurement. Show special coordination requirements for the product. 50230 3.5 SAMPLES SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section 01300-5 Samples: 1. Where unavoidable variations must be expected. submit "range" samples. minimum of 3 units, and describe or identify variations among units of each set. 2. Where selection is required. provide full set of all Options. Preparation: 1. Attach a description to each sample. 2. Attach name of manufacturer or source to each sample. 3. Where compliance with speci?ed properties is required. attach documentation showing compliance. 4. Where there are limitations in availability. delivery. or other similar characteristics. attach description of such limitations. 5. Where selection is required. the first submittal may be a single set of all options: after return of submittal with selection indicated. submit standard number of sets of selected item. REVIEW OF SUBMITTALS Submittals for approval will be reviewed. marl-Led with appropriate action. and returned. Informational submittals: Submittals will be reviewed. RETURN. AND DISTRIBUTION Submittals will be returned to the Contractor by mail. Perform resubmittals in the same manner as original submittals: indicate all changes other than those requested by the Contracting Officer. Distribution: 1. Distribute returned submittals to all subcontractors and suppliers involved in work covered by the submittal. 2. Record distribution on transmittal form with copy to the Contracting Officer. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ coo P2009453 MODIFICATIONS FGRI- IDHE 42 LIE I: sesam, PART 1. SENSITWE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) 01311-1 Network Analysis Schedules SECTION [1131?] NETWORK ANALYSIS SCHEDULES GENERAL SUMMARY A. The Contractor is required by this contract to provide, operate, and maintain a detailed Critical P9341559?wa Path Method progress schedule and components as described below. This CPM schedule shall be the Contractor's working schedule and shall be used to plan. organize, and execute the work, record and report actual performance and progress, and show how the Contractor plans to complete all remaining work as of the end of each progress report period. 1, In preparing the CPM, the Contractor assumes responsibility for conformance with contract requirements, planning, sequencing of work, and determining construction means and methods. The administrative and procedural requirements for the CPM of scheduling and reporting progress of the work are detailed in this section. The principles and definitions of the terms used herein shall be as set forth in the Associated General Contractors of America (AGO) publication The Use of CPM in Construction, copyright 197's. In the event of discrepancies, this section shall govern the development and utilization of the CPM schedule. During the prebid conference, a review will be held as to how this section shall be implemented, and to receive any questions regarding the scheduling and reporting requirements, and the degrees of participation, cooperation, and compliance that shall be required of the Contractor. This section includes the following: 1. Related Sections Quality assurance. Format. Schedules. Submittals. Review and evaluation. Updating schedules. Distribution. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Relatedsections include [he following: 1. Section 01010 - Summary of Work: Work sequence. 2. Section 01300 Submittals: Shop drawings, product data, and samples. 1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. The Contractor shall have the capability to comply with all CPM requirements speci?ed herein with the Contractor's own staff. to retain a consultant capable of providing CPM scheduling services, inctuding planning, evaluating, and reporting. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBLI) use. 2523i?) CDC P2009453 I I B. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) 01311-2 I Network Analysis Schedules The Contractor shall engage an independent CPM consultant. The consultant shall be skilled in the time and cost application of activity on arrow network techniques for construction projects. This consultant shall have no financial or business ties to the Contractor, shall not be an af?liate or subsidiary company of the Contractor. and shall not be employed by an af?liate or subsidiary company of the Contractor. The consultant shall be a subjective specialist, acceptable to the Contracting Officer, who is expert in the CPM of scheduling and reporting. 1. The consultant shall have at least three years experience in scheduling construction work of a complexity comparable to this project, and having use of computer facilities capable of delivering a detailed graphic printout within 48 hours of request. 2. Prior to engaging a consultant, and within 10 days after receipt of the Notice to Proceed, the Contractor shall submit to the Contracting Of?cer the following: a. Name, address, and telephone number of the proposed consultant. in. Suf?cient information to show the proposed consultant has the quali?cations to meet the requirements of this section. c. A list of prior construction projects. aiong with selected activity on arrow network samples on current projects which the proposed consultant has successfully performed. These network samples shall show complete project planning for a project of similar size, scope. and complexity as covered under this contract. 3. The Contracting Of?cer will review the submitted information and notify the Contractor within 10 days from receipt of infon'nation. If the proposed consultant is not acceptable to the Contracting Of?cer, the Contractor shall submit another consultant within 10 days for renewed consideration. a. The proposed consultant must be approved prior to submitting any schedule. The Contractor shall demonstrate to the Contracting Of?cer, prior to the commencement of the work required under this section, that the ContractOr has acquired the necessary personnel and resources to satisfy the performance requirements contained herein. Components of this expertise include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Contractor's Administrative Personnel: Three years minimum experience as a primary participant in the creation, updating, and maintenance of CPM scheduling. 2. Certification. The Contractor shall certify to the Contracting Of?cer that the Contracton a. has the computer equipment (hardware and software) required to produce the requirements of the CPM network diagrams required by this project; b. has computer facilities capable of delivering a detailed graphic printout within 48 hours of request; and c. has performed at least three similar scheduling functions on comparable size projects, evaluated by building type, complexity, construction value, and square footage within the last five years. 3. A close working relationship shall be maintained between the Contractor and the independent CPM consultant throughout the project to assure the CPM is maintained as an accurate, effective. and up to date tool for the Contractor's use. System. The Contractor shall submit for review and approval a description of the type and capabilities of the computerized network system proposed to be used. The Contractor shall use a computer software program for network analysis that has been developed specifically to manage CPM construction schedules and is acceptable to the Contracting Of?cer. Submission shall be within three calendar days of the date of receipt of the Notice to Proceed. 1-4 DEFINITIONS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (58le CDC P2009453 Foal. I [bits 4: U5 I: Eo?arn. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION 01311-3 Network Analysis Schedules A. De?nitions for terms used in this section include the following: 1. Critical Path Method (CPM). A construction scheduling technique using network analysis diagrams to plan and organize construction activities in an orderly manner along the critical path. Network. A network diagram is a graphic representation showing the relationship of activities and events in the correct sequences required to complete the project within the contract time. Fragnet. A sequence of new activities an dtor activity revisions that are proposed to be added to the existing schedule to demonstrate the influence of delay and the method for incorporating delays and impacts into the schedule as they are encountered. Activity. Any single identi?able step in the project. it depends Upon and cannot begin until completion of all preceding activities. Critical activities. Those activities with no (zero) float time and are. therefore, operations that determine the critical path and control project completion. Event. An event is the starting or ending point of an activity and occurs only when all preceding activities have been completed. Float time. The amount of time available for a given activity in excess of its established duration. It represents the amount of leeway available in scheduling an activity. a. Float time shall not be for the exciusive use of either the Government or the Contractor. Use shall be granted by the Contracting Of?cer to the entity who first requires it. Concurrent need shall be prorated between the Government and the Contractor. as determined by the Contracting Officer. b. Claims for delay or extensions of time involving non-critical activities (activities with positive float) which become critical, will be evaluated by the Contracting Officer to determine whether or not additional time will be granted to the Contractor or whether the Contractor shall be responsible to regain the lost time. at no additional cost to the Government, by modifying the schedule of Work. Weather delays. The time for performance of this contract includes an allowance for calendar days which, according to the averages of the most recent available 30-year period from 1971- 2000 may not be suitable for construction work. These montth averages may be obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The mean number of days per month with inclement weather at Atlanta Airport shall serve as the anticipated number of days of inclement weather the Contractor shall provide in the scheduling of work and the preparation of the construction progress schedules. The mean number of days per month shall be prorated for portions of the month the Contractor has exterior work actively ongoing and may be affected by inclement Weather. a. The anticipated inclement weather days by month for Atlanta are as follows: January: 12 May: 10 September?. 8 February: 10 June: 10 October: 6 March: 11 July: 12 November: 9 April: 8 August: ?10 December: 10 b. Weather delay days shall be resolved at the end of the project. The number of inclement weather days shall be the sum of all property recorded inclement weather days experienced during the period of time before the building is dried in. Whether there are more or less inclement weather days than anticipated is found by the difference in the sum of actual number of days and the sum of anticipated inclement weather days during the same months. c. If there are fewer inclement weather days than anticipated during the course of the project prior to being dried in, the Government has the right to offset any Contractor extension of time claims with the number of inclement weather days gained by the Contractor. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) [bilfSiitlE 252arn} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 01311-4 I Network Analysis Schedules d. if there are more inclement weather days than anticipated during the course of the project prior to being dried in. the Contractor has the right to request an extension of time or use the days to offset any reductions in the contract schedule based on contract modi?cations or other reasons. 1.5 CPM SCHEDULES FORMAT A. Components shall include the following: 1. Listings: Reading from left to right. in ascending order for each activity. Identify each activity with the applicable speci?cation section number. 2. Each activity shall be cost loaded and shall directly relate to each pay applicatiOn and to the schedule of values. Submittais shall not be cost loaded. 3. Diagram Sheet Size: Minimum size 600 mm high it 900 mm wide. 4. Scale and Spacing: To allow for notations and revisions. 1.6 BASIC CPM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS A. The Contractor shall provide the Contracting Of?cer with a licensed programmed copy of the scheduling software. It shall be complete with instructions, information. and documentation. B. General: The Contractor shall provide the following activities: 1. Proceed with preparation of the network diagram immediately following receipt of the Notice to Proceed. 2. Follow the steps necessary to complete the development of the network diagram in suf?cient time so that the CPM schedule is submitted to and reviewed by. the Contracting Officer within 10 days. is revised as necessary by the Contractor. and is accepted by the Contracting Of?cer for use no later than 45 days after the receipt of the Notice to Proceed. 3. Establish procedures for monitoring and updating the CPM schedule and for reporting progress: coordinate procedures with progress meeting and payment request dates. 4. Analysis Program: Capable of compiling monetary value of completed and partially completed activities. of accepting revised completion dates. and recomputation of all dates and ?oats. 5. Preparation of Schedule: Show complete sequence of construction by activity, with dates for beginning and completion of each element of construction. The Contractor shall consider and include the following elements of the Construction Schedule as a minimum: a. All activities involved in the project including every activity having a bearing on the time required to complete the wont. b. Illustrate order and interdependence of activities and sequence of work; how start of a given activity depends on completion of preceding activities. and how completion of the activity may affect start of subsequent activities. c. Illustrate complete sequence of construction by activity. identifying work of separate floors or areas as appropriate. Provide dates for submiltals. including those for Government furnished items. and return of submittais: dates for procurement and delivery of critical products; and dates for installation and provision for testing. Provide legend for symbols and abbreviations used. d. Activity durations shall not exceed 15 calendar days each in length. except that non- construction activities (such as procurement of materials. delivery of materials or equipment. or the curing of concrete). e. Required staf?ng by discipline, and by staff units {number of personnel to accomplish activity within scheduled duration). f. All work items involving submittals. materials and installation shall not be included in the SENSITWE BUT INFORMATION (SBU) e12 LI 5 C: 'i 3-9.0" ?10. ?11. CDC P2009453 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION 01311-5 Network Analysis Schedules same activity. There shall be separate activities for submittal. material. and installation. g. The estimated time duration. sequence requirements. and relationships of each activity in relation to other activities. it. For each activity show cost allocations based on the acceptable schedule of values. Schedule all activities to conform to work sequence as required by the Government in the Contract Documents. Activity durations shall not exceed 15 calendar days each in length. except that non- construction activities {such as procurement of materials. delivery of materials or equipment. or the curing of concrete}. Work items involving submittals. materials and installation shall be separate activities. Failure to include any item in the schedule shall not excuse the Contractor from completing all work required within the applicable completion date. Relate the schedule to the entire project at the time of submission of the schedule and provide for the expeditious and practical execution of the Work. - The 0PM shall be capable of providing the following minimum on-site services; Network analysis by I-J or precedence notation. Progress and cost reports. Network comparisons. super and sub-networks. Resource reporting. Report writer allowing flexible formatting and summarization. Graphical output. wineries C. Activity Requirements: The computerized system shall be capable of tabulating. as a minimum. for each activity the following: Identifying activity number (Precedence System) or numbers Activity description. Duration in work days. in calculating activity duration. Saturdays. Sundays. holidays. and normal inclement weather shall be included. Activity code(5)- relating to party responsible to perform work. Cost. personnel. and labor hours. Schedule and actualtremaining durations for each activity. Earliest start date by calendar date. Earliest ?nish date by calendar date. Actual start date by calendar date. . Actual finish date by calendar date. . Latest start date by ca lender date. . Latest ?nish date by calendar date. . Float in work days. . Monetary value of each activity. . Percentage of activity completed. . Contractor?s earnings based on the reported portion of activity completed. D. The following computer outputs shall be required as part of the initial schedule submission and each update thereafter: 1- Activity sort by preceding event number from lowest to highest and then in the order of the following event number. These outputs shall show all activities. including restraints for the duration of the project. Activity sort by the amount of total float. then in order of preceding event number. These outputs shall show all activities. including restraints for the duration of the project. Activity sort by early start for the next Bl] days. then in order of preceding event number. Activity sort by late ?nish for the next BU days. then in order of preceding event number. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ (more; uses zszain) coc 92009453 I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION 01311-6 Network Analysis Schedules 5. Activity sort(s} by organizational (firm doing work) responsibility. E. The CPM system shall be capable of Iii-weekly update and production of physical update reports. F. percent complete reports. and cost reports for payment purposes. The Contractor shall be responsible to analyze factors delaying progress and altering logic and durations on an interactive up to date basis. Access to the system for input and output shall be by terminals located at the construction site. The Contractor shall provide a suitable area and furniture to support system installation including all equipment. paper. and computer time. and further speci?c requirements of the Contractor?s chosen system. DETAILED CPM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS A. General: The CPM system shall consist of diagrams and accompanying mathematical analysis. Flexibility of formatting and summarization of reports shall be provided by selecting and prioritizing from the components listed in Article 1.6. Paragraph of this section. Indicate estimated dates and durations for the following: Preparation and processing of submittals. Purchase. fabrication. and delivery of critical or major elements of work. Installation of all elements of work. Milestone dates of the separate areas andior floors of the project. Receipt of Government furnished and Contractor installed ?xtures. furnishings, equipment, or accessories. Installation of Government furnished and Government installed ?xtures. furnishings. equipment. or accessories. T. All work activities affecting areas in. or adjacent to the project area. These include. but are not limited to. the following: Relocation of occupants. interruption of services and utilities. Anticipated schedule of heavy equipment usage. Excessive noise levels. Interruption of access. pedestrian and vehicular. Working in areas after normal hours. Security clearance into work areas. Security interference. i.e. removal of fencing sections. l. Delivery of equipment. Mathematical Analysis: Tabulate each activity of detailed network diagrams. using calendar dates. and identify for each activity: Preceding and following event numbers. Activity description. Estimated duration of activity. in maximum 15 day intervals. Earliest start date. Earliest ?nish date. Actual start date. Actual ?nish date. Latest start date. . Latest ?nish date. 10. Total and free ?oat. 11. Monetary value of activity. keyed to Schedule of Values. are-ore errors: SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI lobar-42 US SENSITNE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBLI) 01311-7 Network Analysis Schedules CDC P2009453 . I 12. Percentage of activity completed. 13. Responsibility, Contractor or agent. 1.8 COMPONENTS OF THE CPM A. General. 1. The major components of the CPM are as follows: a Preliminary Network Diagram. b. Detailed CPM Project Schedule. c. Master Summary Schedule. d. Staf?ng Requirements Forecast. 2. The Master Summary Schedule and Staf?ng Requirements Forecast are sub~networks of the Detailed 0PM Project Schedule. When there is a requirement to revise or update the Detailed CPM Project Schedule, the same requirements shall apply to the Master Summary Schedule and the Staf?ng Requirements Forecast. 3. Preliminary Network Diagram. 1. Within 10 days of the receipt of the Notice to Proceed, the Contractor shall submit a preliminary network diagram outlining the activities for the first 30 days of construction. The preliminary network diagram shall include a skeleton diagram for the remainder of the work. 2. The preliminary network diagram shall, at a minimum, provide the following: a. Each signi?cantconstruction activity, coordinated each activity in the schedule with other activities, and scheduled in its proper sequence. b. All individual activities within the ?rst 90 days of construction that affect the daily operation of the Government on the campus of this project, including but not limited to the following: 1. Planned utility outages. 2. Temporary road closings. 3. Parking interruptions. 4. Security interferences, i.e. removal of fencing section. 5. Arrival and unloading of major items of equipment. c. All submittals required in the first 90 days of construction, arranged by the Contractor's priority for review. d. All other submittals required to maintain orderly progress of the work, and submittals requiring early review because of long lead time for manufacture andior fabrication shall also be listed, by Contractor's priority, for review. 3. The Contractor shall submit six copies of the preliminary schedule to the Contracting Of?cer for review. C. Detailed CPM Project Schedule. The Detailed CPM Project Schedule shall be constructed to show the order in which the Contractor proposes to carry out the work, to indicate the restrictions of access, the availability of work areas, and the availability and use of staff, materials, and equipment. It shall provide suf?cient detail and clarity of form and technique so that the Contractor can plan, schedule, monitor, controlI and raport on the progress of the work. Further, it shall provide the Contracting Of?cer with a tool to monitor and follow the progress of the project. The Detailed CPM Project Schedule shall comply with the various limits imposed by the scope of work and by any contractually speci?ed intermediate milestone and completion dates. 1. The following criteria shall form the basis for assembly of the logic: a. What activity must be completed before a subsequent activity can be started? b. What activities can be done concurrently? c. What activity must be started immediately following a completed activity? SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 01311-6 I Network Anatysis Scheduies d. What major economic facility or staf?ng restrictions are required for resequencing these activities? The degree of detail shall be to the satisfaction of the Contracting Of?cer but the following factors shall have a bearing on the required depth of activity detail: The physical and structural breakdown of the project. The contract milestones and completion dates. The type of work to be performed and the labor trades involved. All purchase, manufacture, and delivery activities for all major materials and equipment. Deliveries of Government furnished equipment andlor materials. Preparation, submittal, and approval of shop andlor working drawings, coordination drawings and documents, and material samples. Approvals. required by regulatory agencies or other third parties. Plans for all subcontract work. Assignment of responsibility for perfom'ling speci?c activities. Access to and availability of work areas. identi?cation of interfaces and dependencies with preceding, concurrent, and follow-on contractors. I. Actual tests, submission of test reports, and approval of test results. n1. Planning for phased or total occupancy by the Government. n. identi?cation of any staf?ng, material, or equipment restrictions. The activities included in the Detailed CPM Project Schedule shall be analyzed in detail to determine activity time duration in units of calendar days. Duration shall be based on the labor, equipment. and materials required to perform each activity on a normal work day basis. a. The only durations allowed over 15 days shall be those of nonconstruction activities, such as procurement of materials. concrete curing. and delivery of equipment. b. All durations shall be the result of de?nitive staffing and resource planning by the Contractor to perform the work in consideration of contractually de?ned on site work conditions. c. The staf?ng to be assigned, by craft de?nition, shall be shown on each construction activity of the CPM. No more than one craft shall be assigned to a speci?c activity. The Contractor may use staf?ng or equipment restraints, separately noted, to optimize and level staf?ng and equipment requirements. The individual activities involved may be sequenced within the limits of the available total ?oat. a. If this technique is used in establishing the initial schedule. it shall be re?ected in the logic with restraints identi?ed as "restraint - for staf?ng or equipment leveling purposes only". Critical or near critical paths resulting from the use of staf?ng restraints shall be kept to a minimum. Near critical paths shall be de?ned as those paths having 7 days or less of total float at the time of initial submission. A unique event numbering system shall be required to code or identify activities by bid items, work items, areas, procurement, or similar function. No two activities shall have the same event number for identi?cation. The estimated cost to perform each work activity shall be noted graphically on each activity included in the network. The sum of the costs assigned to all activities shall equal the contract value. a. No activity costs shall be assigned to manufacture, submission. and delivery activities. ceases: arc-?23s: The network shall clearly indicate all contract milestones and completion dates. All networks shall be drafted to show a continuous flow of information from left to right with no arrows from right to left. a. The primary path of criticality shall be clearly and graphically identi?ed on the network. Each network drawing shall have a standard grid coordinate system with alpha designation on the axis (top to bottom) and numerical designations on the axis {left to SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEU) CDC P2009453 01311-9 stealth? MODIFICATIONS - I Network Analysis Schedules right) for quick activity reference and for following the planned sequence when using multl-sheet networks. b. Logic ties which cannot be graphically demonstrated as continuous restraints between different segments of the network shall be identified as remote dummies, and shall be referenced as ?to or from event number XXIX, page number yy", followed by appropriate alpha. numeric grid references, or equivalent designation. 8. The status of work in progress. as part of each update submission. shall be similarly identified and the reported percent complete graphically indicated on each activity remaining in progress as of the last report period. D. Master Summary Schedule. The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the Contracting Of?cer a time scale Master Summary Schedule that shows the total project in approximately 20 to 50 activities. This schedule shall accurater summarize the computerized Detailed CPM Project Schedule and shall have common events for correlating the two levels of schedule indenture. Emphasis shall be placed on major milestones and key dependencies among the various parties involved. The Master Summary Schedule shall be Updated to coincide with the pay application. E. Staf?ng Requirements Forecast. The Contractor shall prepare a staf?ng analysis in the form of a series of graphic displays depicting staffing by principal trades in the aggregate, and in accordance with the Detailed CPM Project Schedule. The graphs shall display the number of personnel days of effort. for each month, over the life of the project. This submission shall be computerized and be correlated with the staffing assigned to each activity of the Detailed CPM Project Schedule. 1. The Staffing Requirements Forecast shall be updated and shall include the staffing actually used by trade as of the current report period and the staffing required to complete all remaining contract work. 1.9 SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW A. The summary schedule for the submittals is as follows: 1. Within the speci?ed number of days after the Notice to Proceed, submit proposed Preliminary Network Diagram defining planned operations for the speci?ed length of time, with a skeleton outline for remainder of Work. 2. Within 20 days after Contracting Of?cer has accepted the Preliminary Network Diagram. submit drafts of the following to the Contracting Of?cer for review and acceptance: a. Detailed 0PM Project Schedule. b. Master Summary Schedule. c. Staf?ng Requirements Forecast. 3. Include written certi?cation that all agents of the Contractor, including but not limited to subcontractors, suppliers. and manufacturers, with responsibility for more than 5% of the signed contract face value have reviewed and concur with the preposed schedules. 4. Submit one reproducible transparency and three opaque reproductions required by the Contracting Officer in addition to the copies required by the Contractor. 5. With each application for payment. submit electronic data files in 31/3? diskette form reflecting the status of each month's progress as agreed to during the progress review of the Contractor?s Application for Payment. i 1.10REVIEW, EVALUATION, AND ACCEPTANCE PROCESS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 I (more use. 252m} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION 01311-10 Network Analysis Schedules A. The Contracting Of?cer shall accept or not accept. with written comments. the Contractor?s B. submission within 15 calendar days after receipt of all required information for that submission. At the request of the Contracting Of?cer. the Contractor shall participate in any meetings necessary to jointly review and evaluate the diagrams and logic and to reach mutual agreement and acceptance of each submission. If any of the required submissions are returned to the Contractor for revisions or corrections. they shall be revised and resubmitted for acceptance within 10 calendar days after receipt from the Contracting Of?cer. 1. Review and response by the Contracting Of?cer shall be given within 10 calendar days after receipt of each revised submission. 1.11UPDATING SCHEDULES A. The initial update shall take place during the ?rst week after the acceptance by the Contracting Officer of the Contractor's Detailed CPM Project Schedule. Subsequent updates shall be scheduled at a time acceptable to both the Contracting Of?cer and Contractor prior to each month's application for payment, thereafter for the duration of the contract. The Detailed CPM Project Schedule shall be reviewed by the Contractor and Contracting Of?cer for the purpose of verifying the following: Actual start dates. Actual completion dates. Cost value of work reported in place. Activity percent completion. Revised logic. as built and projected. and changes in activity durations. cost. and manpower assigned. Influence of contract modi?cations. Incorporation of approved time extensions. The Contractor shall come to the updating meetings with the above data prepared in advance for each meeting to provide. as of the end of the updating period, a complete and accurate report of the current procurement and construction progress and a depiction of how the Contractor plans to continue the work of this project and to meet all contract completion dates. 1. All network revisions and status data agreed to during each update shall be considered as acceptable by the Contractor and Contracting Of?cer unless written noti?cation of any exception is given by an objecting party within 10 calendar days after receipt of the Contractor's update submission. 2. For major network revisions that cannot be agreed to during an updating meeting. the Contractor shall submit, in writing, such revisions for the Contracting Of?cer?s acceptance prior to inserting such revisions into the network. a. Submissions may be in the form of marked up networks. fragnets. or schedule abstracts. As part of the updating process. the Contractor shall prepare a Narrative Progress Report describing the physical progress during the report period. actions planned to correct any negative ?oat predictions. identifying activities modi?ed since previous submittal. and an explanation of potential delays andror issues and their estimated impact on performance and the overall project completion date. Additionally. alternatives for possible schedule recovery to mitigate any potential delay andior cost increases should be included for consideration by Contracting Of?cer. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) m9 CDC P2009453 0131141 ts??uf HVAC MODIFICATIONS- FOR I Network Analysis Schedules E. The required number of copies of all reports shall be submitted to the Contracting Of?cer within ?ve calendar days after each updating meeting. F. If the Contractor fails to timer submit any of the update deliverables, the Contracting Officer may withhold approval of progress payments, or a portion thereof, until such time as the Contractor submits the required update reports. 1.12CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS A. When modifications or delays are experienced by the Contractor and the Contractor requests an extension of time, the Contractor shall submit to the Contracting Of?cer a written Time Impact Analysis (TIA) illustrating the. influence of each modification or delay on the current contract schedule completion date. Each TIA shall include a fragnet demonstrating how the Contractor proposes to incorporate the modification or delay into the Detailed CPM Project Schedule. 1. Each analysis shall demonstrate the estimated time impact based on the events of delay, the date the modi?cation was given to the Contractor, the status of constniction at that point in time, and the event time computation of all activities affected by the modi?cation or delay. 1 The event times used in the analysis shall be those included in the latest update of the Detailed CPM Project Schedule or as adjusted for the events of delay. Time extensions shall be granted only to the extent that equitable time adjustments for the activity or activities affected exceed the total or remaining float along the path of activities at the time of actual delay or at the time notice to proceed was issued for a modi?cation. Each shall be submitted in triplicate and within the period defined in the FARS after a delay occurs or notice to proceed with a modi?cation is given to the Contractor. a. When the Contractor does not submit a TIA for a specific modification or delay within the specified period of time, it shall be deemed to have waived its rights to any additional time and cost. There shall be no exceptions to this unless deemed in the Government's interest by the Contracting Of?cer. El. Approval or rejection of each TIA by the Contracting Officer shall be made within 15 calendar days after receipt of each complete TIA, unless subsequent meetings and negotiations are required. Upon approval, a copy of the TIA signed by the Contracting Of?cer shall be returned to the Contractor for incorporation into all appropriate schedules. 1. Upon mutual agreement, fragnets illustrating the influence of modi?cations and delays shall be incorporated into the Detailed CPM Project Schedule during the ?rst update after the modi?cation is executed. 2. In the event the Contractor does not agree with the decision of the Contracting Of?cer regarding the impact of the modi?cation or delay, it shall be resolved in accordance with the Disputes Clause of the contract. 1.1SDISTRIBUTION A. The?Contractor shall, following joint review, distribute copies of updated schedules to Contractor?s project site ?le, Contracting Of?cer, subcontractors, suppliers. and other parties as required. B. The Contractor shall instruct recipients to report, in writing, problems anticipated by projections shown in schedules. PART 2 PRODUCTS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEU) i SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION i CDC P2009453 01311-12 [Egg .. Network Analysis Schedules PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) muf?n: US I: E?Eaihi CDC P2009453 .EQRI I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION - BUILDING INFORMATION Section 01351-1 Sustainable Project Requirements SECTION 01351 SUSTAINABLE PROJECT REQUIREMENTS PART 1 GENERAL ?1 -1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1- Sustainable project goals. 2. Sustainable product requirements. 1.2 SUSTAINABLE PROJECT GOALS A. Comply with the following general sustainable Project goals. Refer to speci?c specification sections for more detailed requirements. Use resources ef?ciently: Reuse existing buildings and materials. Furnish materials that use resources efficiently. Use construction practices that achieve efficient use of resources and materials. Recycle or reuse job site waste. Furnish recycled content materials. Furnish materials that can be recycled. @9995)?? Avoid scarce. irreplaceable, or endangered resources: 1. Furnish materials from abundant. well managed resources. 2. Furnish materials that are replaceable. renewable, or can be replenished. 3. Furnish materials that minimize damage to natural habitats. Use durable materials: 1. Furnish materials with longest usable life. 2. Furnish materials that can be reused. 3. Furnish materials with least maintenance requirements. Create spaces that are healthy for occupants: 1_ Furnish low toxic products and materials. 2. Furnish materials without toxic maintenance requirements. 3. Furnish mechanical equipment that provides fresh air and does not trap water or pollutants. Use energy efficiently: I. Furnish materials with low embodied energy. 2. Furnish materials that save energy during building operations- Use water ef?ciently: Use construction practices that use water ef?ciently. Furnish water conserving appliances and equipment. Landscape Project site for water conservation. Capture and utilize rainwater. .459}be SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION CDC P2009453 action 01351-2 (?"3342 ?5-05 Sustainable Project Requirements 252301} H. Furnish materials that generate least amount of pollution. I. Protect and restore natural habitats on site. i 1.3 A. Product Data: 1. Submit data for ?lter media and ?lter ef?ciency. B. Manufacturer?s Certi?cate: Certify products meet or exceed speci?ed requirements. 1. Certify root surface materials are Energy Star labeled. 2. Certify salvaged or reused Products source and origin. 3. Certify recycled material content for recycled content products. a. Indicate post-consumer recycled content percent by weight. b. Indicate post-industrial recycled content percent by weight. 4. Certify source for local and regional materials. 3. Indicate manufacturing or fabrication location and distance to site in miles. 5. Certify lumber is harvested from Forest Stewardship Council Certi?ed well managed forest. a. Indicate certifying agency and agency accreditation by Ferest Stewardship Council. b. Include chain-of?custody documentation tracking wood product from forest to installed Product. 6. Certify volatile organic compound content for each interior adhesive and sealant and related primer. a. Include data sheet indicating volatile organic compound content for each Product. b. Include Material Safety Data Sheet for each Product. 7. Certify volatile organic compound content for each interior paint and coating. a. Include data sheet indicating volatile organic compound and chemical component content for each Product. b. Include Material Safety Data Sheet for each Product. 8. Certify each composite wood and agri?ber product contains no added urea- forrnaldehyde resins. a. Include data sheet indicating urea?formaldehyde resin content for each Product. C. Cost Data: 1. Submit cost of Products, excluding cost of labor and equipment for installation. for the following Products installed as part of permanent construction: a. Salvaged 0r reused. Recycled material content. c. Local or regional. Certi?ed wood. D. Construction Plans: 1. Construction Waste Management Plan: Indicate analysis of estimated job site waste to be generated. including types and quantities: and proposed alternatives to use of land?ll. a. Submit reports of actual recycling rates. salvage rates, and land?ll rates. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION coc P2009453 FORI -- - C5 2. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ BUILDING INFORMATION Section 351 -3 Sustainable Preject Requirements Construction Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Plan: Indicate absorptive material and HVAC system protection; source control; pathway interruption; housekeeping and construction sequencing. 1.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Exceed minimum energy ef?ciency and performance in accordance with ASHRAE 90.1 or local eneerl code whichever is more stringent. Perform Work without use of CFC based refrigerants in HVAC building systems. Perform ventilation Work in accordance with ASHRAE 62. Develop and implement construction indoor air quality management plan including the following: 1. 2. Comply with minimum requirements of SMACNA IAQ. Protect stored and installed absorptive materials from moisture damage. a. Store materials on elevated platforms under cover, and in dry location. b. materials are not stored in enclosed location, cover tops and sides of material with secured waterproof sheeting. Protect HVAC equipment during construction. a. Shutdown return side of HVAC system whenever possible during heavy construction or demolition b. When HVAC system are operated during heavy construction, furnish disposable temporary ?lters. Replace filtration media immediately before occupancy. Conduct minimum two-week building ?ush-out with new ?ltration media at 100 percent outside air after ends and before occupancy. 1.5 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS A. PART 2 PRODUCTS Limit site disturbance to the following areas: 1. 20 feet beyond building perimeter. Recycle or salvage minimum of 50 percent by weight of construction. and demolition waste. 2.1 PROHIBITED MATERIALS A. Do not use materials containing asbestos. biphenyls (PCB) or other hazardous materials. Do not use HCFC based refrigerants or Halon extinguishing agents. Do not use materials containing butvl for interior lotions. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION [b}[3}242 2e2arh} CDC P2009453 I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION Section 01351?4 Sustainable Project Requirements 2.2 HVAC FILTERS A. Temporary Filters: ASHRAE 52.2 minimum ef?ciency reporting value of 13. 2.3 RECYCLED CONTENT MATERIALS A. Furnish the following materials with minimum recycled content: Material Minimum Recycled Content (Percent) Post Consumer Post Industrial Concrete reinforcement Section 04310 50 Standard Metal Frames Section 03115 50 Metal Wall Guards Section 10260 25 Metal Ductwork Section 15810 25 2.4 LOCAL AND REGIONAL MATERIALS A. Furnish the following materials manufactured and extracted. harvested. or recovered within 500 miles of Project site. 1. 2. 3. 4 Mortar and Masonry Grout: Refer to Section 04065. Unit Masonry: Refer to Section 04810. Steel Door Frames: Refer to Section 08115. Ductwork: Refer to Section 15810. 2.5 LOW EMITTING MATERIALS - INDOOR APPLICATIONS A. Adhesives and Adhesive Primers: Maximum volatile organic compound content in a ccordance with SCAOMD Rule 1168. B. Sealants Used as Fillers and Sealant Primers: Maximum volatile organic compound content in accordance with BAAQMD Regulation 3. Rule 51. C. Paints: Maximum volatile organic compound content in accordance with (38-11. D. Composite Wood and Agri?ber Products: Contain no added urea-formaldehyde resins. PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) - BUILDING INFORMATION IIJIEH US I: CDC P2009453 oval: . . I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 01400-1 Quality Control Procedures SECTION 01400 QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES PART GENERAL SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1.2 B. C. General quality control activities. 2. Procedures for the following: a. Preparation and maintenance of schedule of qualityr control activities. b. Testing and evaluation of test results. c. Inspections. d. Construction and evaluation of mock?ups. 3. Procedures for quality control activities performed by: a. Public authorities having jurisdiction. In Contracting Of?cer. Independent testing agencies. d. Contractor. Manufacturers representatives. 4. Procedures for submittal of quality control documentation. Quality control activities required are speci?ed in other sections. The cost of quality control activities speci?ed to be paid for by the Government is not to be included in the contract sum. CONTRACT CONDITIONS When portions of the work are required by the contract documents or by governing authorities to be tested, inspected. or approved. such tests, inspections. and approvals shall he made at the appropriate time. Unless othenvise indicated. all tests. inspections. and approvals shall be made by an independent testing agency. the appropriate public authority. or other entity acceptable to the Government. . Unless otherwise speci?ed. the Contractor shall arrange for all tests. inspections. and approvals to be made and shall pay costs of all tests. inspections. and approvals. including related costs due to such tests. inspections. and approvals. The Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer of the time and place where tests and inspections are to be made so the Contracting Officer may have adequate time to arrange to observe such procedures. If the contract documents require that the Contracting Officer observe tests. inspections. or approvals. the Contracting Officer will do so at no additional cost to the Contractor. provided such tests. inspections. or approvals are to be conducted at the project site. The Government shall pay for tests. inspections. and approvals that become requirements after bids are received or negotiations concluded. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU CDC P2009453 Section 01400-2 I Quality Control Procedures 262301} G. If the Contracting Of?cer gives the Contractor written instruction to perform additional testing or inspection not already included in the contract documents. the Contractor shall arrange for such additional testing or inspection. The Government shall pay for such tests and inspections except as provided in the following paragraphs. H. If such additional procedures show that portions of the work do not comply with the contract documents. the Contractor shall pay all costs arising thereafter due to such noncompliance including those due to repeating such procedures as well as payment for the services and expenses of the Contracting Of?cer. Unless otherwise indicated, the Contractor shall obtain all certi?cates of testing, inspection. and approval and shall deliver them to the Contracting Of?cer. J. Independent testing agencies, whether employed by the Government or the Contractor. may not change the requirements of the contract documents and may not approve any portion of the work. K. Employment of testing agencies. by the Contractor or the Government. shall not relieve the Contractor of his obligation to perform the work in accordance with the contract documents. 1.3 DEFINITIONS A. Certi?cate: A written statement that a portion of the work as accomplished or a particular product conforms to the requirements of the contract documents. 8. Installer: Any entity who performs a construction activity. whether an employee. subcontractor. or sub-subcontractor of the Contractor. C. Government's Testing Agency: Any independent testing and inspection agency employed by the Government to perform certain quality control activities. 1.4 REFERENCE STANDARDS A. Reference Standards - General: 1. Comply with edition of standard indicated. 2. Compliance with standards. which are revised or reissued after that date will not be required unless incorporated into the contract documents by modi?cation. 3. Where applicable codes. laws. or regulations require editions of different dates. obtain instructions from the governing authorities as to which edition is required. 3. The requirements of reference standards are binding on the Contractor. just as if they were copied into the contract documents. but no provisions of reference standards shall alter the contractual relationship of the parties to the contract. C. Keep at the site at least one copy of each reference standard speci?ed which covers ?eld mixing. installation quality. or ?eld quality control methods. 1.5 A. Schedule of Quality Control Activities: 1. Submit as part of the progress schedule. 2. Submit as part of the contractor?s construction schedule. 3. Revise as required by the Government. to coordinate with the Government?s testing agency activities. 4. Distribute to: SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBUJ CDC P2009453 .. I us a scam 1.5 BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 01400-3 Quality Control Procedures a. The GovernmenL b. The Contracting Of?cer. c. Each entity performing work for which quality control activities are speci?ed. Reports: Provide certified copies of reports. 1. Unless otherwise indicated, submit for information only. 2. Submit reports not later than the date of application for payment for the work to which the quality control activity relates. 3. Reports shall be prepared by the entity performing the quality control activity. 4. Submit copies directly to governing authorities when so directed. 5 When the Contractor employs an independent testing agency, submit copies directly to the Contracting Officer. S. Include the following information in all types of reports: Date of report. Proiect name (and number, if applicable}. Description of the quality control activity. Name, address, and telephone number of entity performing activity. Data quality control activity was performed. Specification sectionts) involved. Basis for evaluation (test method, etc). Results or conclusions, including evaluations and interpretations. . Title, name, and signature of person performing activity. nclode the following information in all test reports: Locations from which samples were taken, If any. b. Ambient conditions at time of activity. c. Recommendations for retesting, if any. T4 Certi?cates: Submit for information only, unless otherwise indicated. 1. Certi?cates shall be signed by the product manufacturer, unless otherwise speci?ed or not applicable. - 2. Include the following information: a. Date of certificate. b. Project name (and number, if applicable). c. Description of the product or system certified. d. Speci?cation section(s} involved. e. When actual materials to be used are to be certi?ed, include lot identi?cation markings. destination or shipment, and quantity in shipment. f. Title, name, and signature of person authorized to make codi?cation. Qualification Statements: Submit for information only. unless otherwise indicated. Manufacturers' Instructions: Submit for information only, Unless otherwise indicated; identify conflicts with contract documents. QUALITY ASSURANCE Qualifications of Manufacturers: As indicated in individual sections. Qualifications of Installers: As indicated in individual sections. Quali?cations of Testing and Inspection Personnel: As indicated in individual sections. Testing Equipment: Calibrated at reasonable intervals with devices of an accuracy traceable to either the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) standards or to accepted values of natural physical constants. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED BUILDING INFORMATION BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEU CDC P2009453 Section 01400-4 ?5'31? Quality Control Procedures COORDINATION WITH OTHER ENTITIES 1Cooperate with other entities performing quality control activities. Provide samples of materials and design criteria as indicated and when requested. Provide other assistance. equipment, tools. and storage facilities as speci?ed. If desired. make arrangements with those entities and pay for additional similar or related testing or inspection required for the Contractor's use or convenience. SEQUENCING AND SCHEDULING Prepare a schedule of quality control activities required. 1. Inciude activities of the Government's testing agencies. 2. Provide the following information for each activity: Speci?cation section number. Description of the activity. Identification of test or inspection methods. Enumeration of results required. Number of tests required. Number and type of samples to be taken. if any. Starting time of activity. The date that the work will be ready for the Government's testing agency access. Elapsed time required for activity. 1. Entity responsible. k. Special requirements for activity. assassins!? Coordinate quality control activities to avoid delay and to make it unnecessary to uncover work for testing or inspection. Notify the Government?s testing agencies 14 working days prior to commencement or completion of work. which is to be tested or inspected. whichever is applicable. PART 2 - PRODUCTS USED) PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 A. GENERAL Provide work of the speci?ed quality; where quality level is not indicated. provide work of quality customary in similar types of work. 1. Where codes. laws. or regulations require work of higher quality or performance. provide work complying with those codes. laws. and regulations. 2. Where two or more quality provisions of the contract documents con?ict. comply with the most stringent requirement: where requirements are different but apparently equal. and where it is uncertain which requirement is most stringent. obtain clari?cation from the Contracting Of?cer before proceeding. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) coo P2009453 . -- I INTER-12 US C: 3.2 3.3 3.5 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 01400-5 Quality Control Procedures 3. Actual quality may exceed the specified quality; verify that such differences are acceptable to the Government (other criteria may make excessive quality undesirable}. Control products, suppliers, manufacturers, site conditions, installers. and workmanship in such a manner as to produce work of the specified quality. Comply with manufacturersi instructions and recommendations. 1. Keep a record of instructions and recommendations which supplement or conflict with the manufacturer's written instructions. 2. When manufacturers' instructions and recommendations conflict with the contract documents, obtain clarification from the Contracting Of?cer before proceeding. Use installers who are capable of producing work of the speci?ed quality. Perform all quality control activities speci?ed unless indicated to be performed by other entities. Mock-ups required are speci?ed in other sections. Construct mock-Ups as speci?ed for actual work, with all components required for a complete installation. Erect speci?ed mock-ups in location(s) approved by Contracting Of?cer. 1. Where mock-ups are to be removed, clear area after removal of mock-up and return to original condition. I Where mock-ups are to be approved by the Contracting Of?cer, obtain approval of the Contracting Officer prior to proceeding with installation. Where mock?ups are to be tested for compliance, obtain satisfactory test results prior to proceeding with the work. TESTING Perform tests speci?ed. When results of tests are unsatisfactory, make whatever changes or repairs are necessary and retest. Submit written report of each original test and of each retesL INSPECTING Perform inspections specified. When inspections reveal unsatisfactory work, make whatever changes or repairs are necessary and reinspect. Submit written report of each original inspection and each reinspectlon. PROTECTION AND REPAIR SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION .42 CDC P2009453 Section 0140045 (25gb)? I I I Quality Control Procedures A. When work is uncovered dun?ng quality control activities, provide protection from damage. B. Correct work damaged by quality control activities; where repair is indicated as an unacceptable method. replace the work. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) rbl-IZE :12 I: coc P2009453 HVAC MODIFICATIONS F-ORI - -- SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU Section [11500-1 Temporary Facilities and Controls SECTION 01500 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS PART GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. Temporary Utilities: Electricity, ?ghting, heating, ventilation, telephone service, water, and sanitary facilities. B. Temporary Controls: Dust control. noise and vibration control, pest control, protection of the Work. and security measures. C. Construction Facilities: Field offices and sheds, access roads. and parking. D. Removal of Utilities, Facilities, and Controls. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Related sections include the following: Section 01010 - Summary Of Wonk. 2. Section 017'00 - Contract Closeout. 1.3 TEMPORARY UTILITIES A. Electricity. 1. Connect to existing power service. Power consumption shall not disrupt Government's need for continuous service. 2- Government will pay cost of energy used. Exercise measures to conserve energy. If electrical use appears excessive, the Government reserves the right to require the Contractor to provide separate power to be paid for by the Contractor. 3. If, upon inspection of the power characteristics, the Contractor ?nds that additional work is required for his use, then all necessary work shall be done by the Contractor and paid for by the Contractor. 4. Provide power outlets for construction operations, with branch wiring and distribution boxes located as determined by Contractor. Provide flexible power cords as required. 5. Provide main service disconnect and over current protection at convenient location. All temporary electrical services shall be GFCI protected, installed and paid for by the Contractor. 6. Permanent convenience receptacles may not be utilized during construction. Provide adequate distribution equipment, wiring, and outlets to provide single phase branch circuits for power and lighting. 8. Provide duplex outlets and circuits for power tools as determined by Contractor. 9. All costs associated with temporary power, unless noted above, shall be paid by Contractor. 3. Lighting. 1. Provide and maintain lighting for construction operations as required by each activity and as required by safety standards, regulations, and recommendations. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (saui SENSITIVE BUT (SBU CDC P2009453 S?ign 015992 Provide branch wiring from power source to distribution boxes with lighting conductors. pigtails. and lamps as required. Provide phase branch circuits for lighting as installed by the Contractor based on governing codes and regulations. Maintain lighting and provide routine repairs. Permanent building lighting may be utilized during construction. All costs associated with temporary lighting. unless noted above. shall be paid by Contractor. . Heating and Cooling. The Government's existing heat or cooling sources may be utilized when readily available. Where resources are not available. provide temporary heat or cooling devices as needed to maintain speci?ed conditions for construction operations. a. Government heat or cooling source may not be available at all times to maintain temperatures required for particular construction operations. Therefore. it remains the Contractor's responsibility to assure the temperature is maintained at the required level for the speci?ed construction operation with supplemental heat or cooling source. When the Government's existing heat or cooling source is used. the Government will pay the cost of energy used from its own source only. unless noted otherwise. Exercise measures to conserve energy. The new heat or cooling source in this project may not be utilized by the Contractor. All costs associated with temporary heating and cooling, unless noted above. shall be paid by Contractor. . Ventilation. Ventilate enclosed areas to achieve curing of materials. to dissipate humidity. and to prevent accumulation of dust. fumes. vapors. or gases. The Contractor shall provide. service. and operate ventilation equipment as required to maintain clean air for construotion operations. All costs associated with temporary ventilation. unless noted above. shall be paid by Contractor. Telephone Service. Provide. maintain and pay for telephone service to ?eld of?ce at time of project mobilization. Water Service. Government will pay cost of water used. Exercise measures to conserve water. Extend branch piping with outlets located so water is available by hoses with threaded connections. Provide temporary pipe insulation to prevent freezing. All costs associated with temporary water service. unless noted above. shall be paid by Contractor. . Sanitary Facilities. Existing Government facilities shall not be used. The Contractor shall furnish and install temporary portable chemical toilet facilities for all construction personnel. Provide at time of project mobilization. Minimum number of units shall be as required by applicable codes and regulations. The Contractor shall maintain. service. and clean facilities as required by applicable codes and regulations and as required by the Contracting Of?cer. . Government Equipment. Government equipment shall not be utilized during this project by the Contractor?s sta??. BUT UNCLASSIFIED CDC P2009453 HVACMODIEICATIQNS- I =12 32th SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (seu Section 01500-3 Temporary Facilities and Controls subcontractors, agents. or suppliers. Equipment includes fax machines, copiers. and all other office equipment and supplies. 1.4 TEMPORARY CONTROLS A. Dust Control. 1. Execute IWork by methods to minimize raising dust from construction operations. 2. Provide and pay for positive means to prevent air-borne dust from dispersing into atmosphere. Provide requirements of speci?c speci?cation sections where stated. Noise and Vibration Control. 1. Execute work by methods to minimize noise and vibrations from construction Operations. This includes all scheduled work. All schedules shall be reviewed and approved by the Contracting Of?cer before such noiSe andlor vibration producing elements of work are performed. A minimum of 14 days notice to the Government is required before any such procedures may be executed, subject to approval by the Contracting Officer. 2. Refer to speci?c speci?cation sections for additional requirements. Pest Control. 1. Measures shall be taken, and paid by Contractor to insure the permanent removal during construction of all pests and rodents that may be discovered, due to, or attracted, because of construction activities of this contract. All such measures shall be in strict accordance with all applicable codes and the operating procedures, guidelines and requirements of CDC. Protection of Installed Work. 1. Protect installed Work and provide special protection where speci?ed in individual speci?cation sections. 2. Provide temporary and removable protection for installed Products. Control activity in immediate work area to minimize damage. 3. Provide protective coverings at walls, projections, jambs, sills, and sof?ts of openings. 4. Protect ?nished floors, stairs, and other surfaces from traffic, dirt, wear, damage, or movement of heavy objects, by protecting with durable sheet materials. Security. 1. The Contractor shall provide security fences, and other measures to protect Work, existing facilities, and Govemment?s operations from unauthorized entry, vandalism, or theft. 2 If Contractor breaches or causes a change in any security device, barrier, or equipment, the Contractor shall return the security component to the same status before the end of the same work day. a. While the security component is not functioning or operating as intended, the Contractor shall provide at no additional cost to the Government temporary means to safeguard the area typically secured until the inoperable security component is restored to its intended capabilities. 3. Coordinate with Government's security program. 1.5 CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES A. Field Offices and Sheds. 1. Office: Structurally sound, weatherrtight, with raised floor, lighting, electrical outlets, heating and cooling equipment, and equipped with sturdy furniture and drawing display table. BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION rseU} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section 01500-4 U305 I Temporary Facilities and Controls Storage Sheds: As required. provide suitable sheds for storage of materials. 2. At Contractor?s option, mobile of?ces or portable buildings may be used for of?ces. 3. Maintain throughout construction period. 4. Fill and grade site for temporary structures to provide drainage. 5. install of?ces on ?xed foundations. 6. Provide steps. railings. and landings as required at entrance doors to of?ces. Provide continuous maintenance for temporary structures. services. and furnishings. 8. Location of Of?ces and Sheds: Locate temporary structures to avoid interference with work. as approved by Contracting Of?cer. 9. Relocate temporary structures as required by progress of work. 8. Access Roads. 1. Provide and maintain access to ?re hydrants. free of obstructions. 2. Construction traf?c may use only designated existing on-site roads. Load height. length. or other features may require entry into and from the campus by a particular route established by the Contracting Of?cer and CDC security upon noti?cation from the Contractor. 3. The Contractor shall provide a notice of request to the Contracting Of?cer at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled delivery. C. Parking. 1. Contractors parking shall be as designated by Contracting Of?cer within the CDC campus. 1.6 REMOVAL OF UTILITIES. FACILITIES. AND CONTROLS A. Remove temporary above grade or buried utilities. equipment. facilities. and materials. prior to ?nal inspection. Clean and repair damage caused by installation or use of temporary work. Restore existing facilities used during construction to original condition. Restore permanent facilities used during construction to speci?ed condition. Landscaping: Plant landscape elements where damaged or destroyed by Contractor's execution of work. When replacing grass. plant mix of grass as determined by Contracting Of?cer to match existing adjacent grassed areas. 1. 2. 3. Plant landscape materials during recommended season only. Maintain grass by mulching. watering. reseeding. and other methods until healthy and permanent stand of grass has occurred. Plant and completely maintain other landscaping elements as recommended for the particular specres. PARTS 2 and 3 Not Used END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) my: 4: us I: Essam, coc P2009453 - I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 01546-1 Health and Safety SECTION 01546 HEALTH AND SAFETY PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 APPLICABLE STANDARDS: A. Refer to the references to health and safety standards published in 41 CFR Part 50-204 which require Contractor compliance with standards such as, but not limited to, the US. Department of Labor 29 CFR Part 1910 OSHA Genera:r industry Standards and Regufatr'ons or Part 1926 OSHA Construction Standards and Regulations. and applicable local codes and national consensus standards. Compliance with Regulations: Where there is a conflict between applicable regulations, the most stringent shall apply. Contamination or pollution ofany natural (air, land, water) or cultural (historical and archaeological sites) resources is prohibited. Disposal of surplus or excess materials shall comply with Federal, State and local regulations and guidelines. Tobacco Free Environment. The use of tobacco products, including cigarettes, cigars, snuff, chewing tobacco, and all other tobacco products is prohibited on all CDC campuses. A verbal warning is given for the ?rst offense by an individual. A repeat violation by the same individual shall be followed by a written warning from the Contracting Of?cer. A third violation by the same person shall result in removal of the person from the project. A. Abusive, discourteous, insulting, or threatening behavior toward those persons enforcing this policy shall not be tolerated and may result in removal ofthe individual regardless ofthe number of offenses. Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan. The Contractor shall not be allowed to commence wort: on site until the CHSP has been approved by the Contracting Officer. Refer to Article 1.4 COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN GUIDELINES for information and requirements. The OHS points of contact for initial project review and questions are Joe Patton and Dwayne Laslty. They will coordinate requests and provide appropriate contacts or resources for specific issues and questions. 1-2 CDC HEALTH. SAFETY. AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS A. CDC Health and Safety Requirements. As a SUpplement to the requirements for health and safety issues listed in the P60 solicitation, the following required tasks with approximate time per new person to achieve each task (including travel) are listed. 1- Safety Survival Skills Training 2 hours 2. Each TB skin test trip to CDC 3 hours per visit 3. Baseline serum 3 hours Government Required Tests: All employees of the Contractor involved in work within a space de?ned as hazardous by the Government shall be required to provide a base line serum sample. No other immunizations are required for this project by OHS. Tetanus is strongly advised for any construction project. The base line serum is the only test that CDC will provide at a CDC OHS Clinic. All other immunizations are the responsibility of the Contractor to coordinate and execute. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORIVIATICIN (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) .. Heat", and Safety 1. Tetanus. A tetanus immunization is valid for 10 years. C. Government Provided Decontamination: As required by the presence of hazardous materials. the Government shall thoroughly decontaminate the work area prior to commencement of any work by the Contractor in said space. Government Provided Security Devices: Security badges and card keys will be issued to the Contractor by CDC. as appropriate. and will be monitored by CDC's Physical Security Activity. Refer to SectiOn 0154 7 Personnel Security Requirements for additional information. 1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Contractor Responsibility: The Contractor shall assume full responsibility and liability for compliance with all applicable regulations pertaining to the health and safety of personnel during the execution of work, and shall hold the Government harmless for any action or lack of action by the Contractor or by any of the Contractor's employees or subcontractors, which results in illness, injury or death. Project Speci?c Safety and Health Program. The Contractor shall establish and maintain a safety program to protect the safety of all workers on the construction worksite and identify by name and title the individual with overall responsibility to ensure implementation of health and safety requirements on-site. The Contractor's safety program shall be outlined in a written Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan. The Government has outlined and included as an attachment to this document the CDC Contractor Guidelines for Preparing the Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan to assist Contractors in preparing this submittal. The information included in the guidelines is not all inclusive and does not relieve the Contractor and its agents of their responsibility for the development and implementation of other applicable health and safety programs and training requirements. andlor compliance with other regulations and standards set forth in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations FR) Part 191 0. Occupational Safety and Health Standards. and Part 1926. Safety and Health for Construction. . Copies of Required Documents. The Contractor shall have one up to date copy of each applicable and other required health and safety documentation on-site. This shall include. but not limited to. OSHA Standards for the Construction industry. and 29 CFR 1910. 1.4 COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN A. Comprehensive Plan: The Contractor shall provide to the Contracting Of?cer a written Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan (CHSP) for the speci?c work under this contract. The Contractor's CHSP shall address all occupational safety and health requirements outlined in Table I. Safety and Health Policies. Administration and Management of the CDC Contractor guidelines for Preparing the Comprehensive Health and Safety Plan. as well as speci?c hazard prevention and control measures taken to address the applicable safety requirements outlined in Table Hazard Prevention and Control Programs Only). 1. The Contractor?s CHSP shall cover all aspects of onssite construction operations and activities associated with work of this contract. The Contractor. as speci?ed in Table I. shall conduct a Construction Phase Hazard Analysis to identify and address all potential hazards and required safety training necessary to protect Contractor or subcontractor employees. visitors and the public. as well as prevent unnecessary work interruptions due to damage to property. materials. supplies. and equipment. 2. The purpose of the CHSP is to ensure compliance by the Contractor and subcontractors with all applicable environmental. health and safety regulations and any project specific requirements aur UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (saui SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFLED INFORMATION coc P2009453 Section 01545-3 .. Foal - - Health and Safety speci?ed by the Government. 3. All Contractor CHSP submittals shall address the information requested in Table I. 4. The information included in these tables is not all inclusive and does not relieve the Contractor and subcontractors of their responsibilities for the development and implementation of other applicable health and safety programs and training requirements, andtor compliance other regulations and standards set forth in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CF R), Part 1910, Occupational Safety and Health Standards and Part 1926, Safety and Health for Construction. 5. The Contractor shall not be allowed to commence work on site until the CHSP has been approved by the Contracting Of?cer. B. Safety Training: The Contractor shall maintain on site and make available upon request to the Contracting Of?cer documentation that its employees have received the necessary training such as, but not limited to, applicable OSHA required safety and health training outlined in Table medical surveillance programs, personal protective and safety equipment, hazard recognition and protective measures, and manufacturer's product and material safety data sheets (MSDS) required forthe work described by the Contract Documents. The training shall also include, but not be limited to, the following elements: The nature of the environment of the work area and adjacent areas. Location of first aid stations. Location of telephones and emergency numbers. Program personnel and the area's protocol. Procedure to report unsafe conditions. Requirements to maintain clean and safe work area. Allowable work conditions and schedule. Observation of CDC physical security policies and procedures. In accordance with OSHA 29 CFR 1910.14? Control of Hazardous a Tagout. CDC and the Contractor will inform each other of respective lockout or tagout procedures. . The Contractor shall ensure compliance with 29 CFR Safety Training and Education for employees entering con?ned spaces: 29 CFR 1926.35 Employee Emergency Action Plans; and 29 CFR 1925 Sub Part V, Power Transmission and Distribution. which outlines the standards for construction of electric transmission and distribution lines and equipment. Particular attention shall be paid to 29 CFR 1926.956 Underground Lines. which includes the requirements for con?ned space entry. a. C. Warnings: Warning signs shall be continuously and conspicuously placed to provide adequate warning of construction hazards to workers and the public. D. Work Area: Work with the CDC often takes place in a highly specialized environment Employees of the Contractor may be within close proximity to sensitive, valuable and unique animals1 specimens. exceriments, or equipment. Employees of the Contractor shall, at all times, remain only in those areas designated for the execution of this Work. Failure to follow this protocol may endanger the employee and Government staff, animals or equipment- Said failure may be grounds to pennanenlly remove the employee from the project. Repeated violations may be grounds to remove the Contractor from the project. E. Meetings: The Contractor shall hold weekly safety meetings with all employees. These meetings shall include environmental, safety and health issues related to the Work. Written reports shall be provided to the Contracting Officer on the contents of each meeting, the attendees and a report of any safety inspections made that week by the Contractor. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION MW r, 3 coo P2009453 . . Section 01546-4 262a-hi .HVACMDDIFICATIONS FOR I I Health and Safety F. Fire Prevention and Protection: The Contractor shall execute the ?re prevention and protection plan submitted as part of the Comprehensive Plan. The following are elements of the plan, although the plan shall not be limited to the following: Housekeeping. Good housekeeping, with provision for prompt removal and disposal of accumulations of combustible scrap and debris, shall be maintained in all areas of the jobsite. Approved self-closing metal containers shall be used for disposal of waste saturated with combustible and ?ammable liquids. 2. Codes and Regulations. The Contractor shall comply with the requirements published in the current revisions of the National Electrical Code, National Electrical Safety Code, and the National Fire Protection Association standards. 3. Fires. Fires and open ?ame devices shall not be left unattended unless protected with automatic temperature control and shutoff devices. 4. Cleaning and Degreasing. Gasoline and liquids with a flash point below 33E shall not be used for cleaning and depressing. 5. Building Exits. All buildings, shops and plant facilities in which employees are required to work shall have at least two well marked and lighted exits. The two exits shall be arranged to minimize the possibility of both exits being rendered inaccessible by a ?re or emergency condition. 6. Fire Extinguisher. marked ?re extinguisher rated a:b:c or greater shall be suitably placed at locations and intervals as required by codes governing this work. 7. Hot Work Permits. As required by the work activities of this project, a mandatory meeting shall be held with the Contracting Of?cer and other interested parties to review the requirements of a Hot Work Permit. This permit is required for all welding, torch cutting, and other hazardous work activities. All Hot Work is to be inspected by the Of?ce of Health and Safety (OHS). Three working da 5 riorto an Hot Work being done, the Contractor shall contact OHS Fire Protection Engineer, by e?mail to - -- - pection. lfa timely response is not received. contact by telephone at to schedule the inspection. a. The Contractor shall inform the Contracting Of?cer of the date and time of the inspection. Hazardous Substances: Priorto bringing hazardous substances, as de?ned in 29 CFR 1910. 1200, onto the projectsite, all Contractor employees involved shall be advised of material safetydata sheet (MSDS) information and a copy of each hazardous substances MSDS shall be provided to the Contracting Of?cer, prior to delivery of hazardous substance. Emergency Numbers: Emergency telephone numbers and reporting instructions for ambulance, physician, hospital. ?re, police and National Response Center shall be conspicuoust posted at the project site by the Contractor. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: Unless otherwise speci?ed. the Contractor is responsible for providing all necessary safety and personal protective equipment needed by its employees. This equipment shall meet appropriate OSHA, NIOSH and ANSI approval requirements and shall be in good working order. A. The Contractor shall con?rm in writing, prior to commencement of the work, that its employees have received appropriate training on the use and maintenance of safety and personal protective equipment prior to its use. Failure to correctly use appropriate safety equipment is a violation of the contract and may result in default of the contract. 2.2 PROTECTION: SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION {531.1} coc P2009453 53m? ?1545-5 EEZaili or damage to property of others. Forthe purposes of this contract, the public or building occupants shall include all persons not employed by the Contractor or a subcontractor of this project. B. No corridor, aisle, stairway, door, or exit shall be obstructed or used in such a mannerasto encroach upon routes of ingress or egress utilized by the public or building occupants. orto present unsafe or unhealthy condition to the public or building occupants. Contractor ladders or other similar equipment necessary to perform the work shall not be left unattended at the work site. 0. Powder actuated devices shall not be used in occupied buildings without priorwrit?len approval from the Contracting Of?cer. PARTS EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. Contractor shall examine work space prior to com men cement of Work. Report any condition that may potentially affect proper execution of Work to the Contracting Officer. B. The Governmentwill occupy the site throughout the construction period. Therefore, the activities of the Contractor may require modi?cation from those activities anticipated under more normal construction conditions. The Contractor shall provide the necessary equipment and methods, base the schedule of the project on the known operational features of the work area, and adhere to the requirements of affected activities. Activities which may be affected by the specialized environment of this project include, but are not limited to, the following: Minimize the creation of construction debris. vapors and airborne particulates- 2. Special protective equipment and apparatus that may be needed by employees of the Contractor. 3. Animal facility andlor laboratory protocol relating to the safety and health of CDC personnel. animals and others. 4 Restricted work hours. Certain spaces may have speci?c periods of time only during which work may be done. 5. Restricted access and egress. Due to normal operations by CDC of particular spaces where Work may be done, the movement of the Contractor?s employees to, from or within the Work area may be restricted during certain portions of the day. 6. Maintenance of life safety devices. The Contractor shall notify the Contracting Of?cer when any work activities may set off any existing life safety device ?14 days prior tothe scheduled work. Ifa device needs to be removed from service temporarily, the Contractor shall provide the necessary personnel to patrol the area affected, and notify CDC security immediately if an emergency anses. END OF SECTION I i A. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent injuryto the public, building occupants, SENSITIVE EIUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (ecu; SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) [meme uses P2009453 - I Section 01547-1 2622101} i Personnel Security Requirements SECTION 0154? PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS PART 1. PERSONNEL SECURITY PROCESS 1.1 De?nitions A. Security Process: The submission and review of employee information to the CDC for the evaluation of potential threats to CDC property andi'or personnel. The process requires the completion of several questionnaire forms by CDC. the Contractor. and employees. B. Foreign National: All persons that are not United States citizens. C. Contractor: The Contractor who signed the contract for the work being performed. The Contractor is also responsible for all subcontractors. agents. suppliers. manufacturers. and other that may need to access the project site as though each was an employee of the Contractor. 1.2 Contractor Exclusion A. A Contractor is not required to complete the personnel security process for an employee if the Contractor employee has a valid National Security Clearances (Secret or Top Secret) from another agency. The Personnel Security Processing Of?ce shall determine individual status based on analysis of documentation provided by the Contractor/employee. 1. For specific questions pertaining to this situation. contact the Personnel Security Processing Of?ce at (770) 438-1332. B. All other Contractor employees shall complete the security process. 1.3 Security Process A. The security process consists of the following sequenced steps. 1. List of Employees from Contractor and the completionfsubmission of the Form by each employee. Contractor personnel input into the CDC Mainframe System. Completion of the CF 306 (Declaration for Federal Employment). Completion of the CDC Safety Survival Skills Training. Completion of the CDC Security Awareness Course [as required). Completion of CDC Credential Request and Cardltey Forms. Completion of Appointment 1: Fingerprinting and SF 85 initiation (Unline). Completion of the SF 85 {Cniine}. Completed by Contractor personnel. Completion of Appointment 2: Pick up of BadgeiCardkey. B. List of Employees from Contractor. 1. Upon award of contract. the Contracting Of?cer will request from the Contractor a list of all employees who will work on the project. including the following information: Full Name (Last Name {list Name Full Middle Name. as on Birth Certi?cate) Position Title Social Security Number Date of Birth ease SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 01547-2 anc MODIFICATION s-ro? Personnel Security Requirements e. Place of Birth (City. State or Cityr'Countiy] f. Email Address g. Telephone Number This information shall be provided to the CDC via the Electronic Questionnaire In- Processing Forrn (E-QIP). Each Contractor employee shall complete and emailffax an E-OIP form to the project's Contracting Officer to one of the two following Personnel Security Processing Of?ces: - Roybal Campus Personnel Security Processing Of?ce: (404) 639-?849 - Koger Ctr. Personnel Security Processing Of?ce (Yale Bldg): The Contractor may Fax to either Personnel Security Processing Of?ce, but it recommended that they Fax to the of?ce closestfmost convenient to the project site. The Contractor shall identify all Foreign Nationals and Naturalized Citizens that will work on the project. a. The Contractor shall submit the E-QIP for all Foreign National or Naturalized Citizen employees at the same time all other are submitted. for Foreign National or Naturalized Citizen employees shall included the following additional information: 1] Authorization Type andr'or Category Type, Passport or VisaJGreen-Card) 2) Authorization Number 3) Authorization Start Date 4} Authorization Expiration Date b. Upon receipt of the the Contract Of?cer or the Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative shall request visitor access to the CDC by entering basic employee and visit data into the Visitor Management System (VMS). Once the basic data has been entered into the VMS, the employee will receive an email from the requesting further, more detailed information. After the employee completes the VMS requirement, the request will be routed for multiple reviews and approvals, ultimately arriving at the Of?ce of Security and Emergency Preparedness (OSEP) for ?nal approval. c. OSEP wiil review request, and issue ruling of approval. If request is not approved. the Foreign National or Naturalized Citizen shall not enter any CDC facility. If the request is approved, the employee will befall in line with the badging process for US. Citizen Contractor employees. The Contracting Of?cer andfor the Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative will determine the length of time each employee will need to access CDC facilities. Employees that need to enter CDC facilities five cumulative business days or less within a Ell] clay period. may be: a. Processed through the Visitors? Center at each campus. Monday - Friday ?:00 AM ?5:00 PM. and shall be; h. Escorted at all times by a CDC-Badged Contractor employee while on?n any CDC campusrtacility. The Contractor shall provide a list (and E-OIP Forms) for each employee that will be on?n any CDC campusffacility more than ?ve cumulative business days within a 90 day period to the Contracting Of?cer. a. Contractor shall provide all information listed in Article 1.3 Secur?y Process, Paragraph B, Items'i 8r 2. b. Approximately two business days are required to enter the employee information into the CDC mainframe once the E-QIP is received. Upon receipt of the List of Employeest?QIP Forms, CDC will perform the following tasks; a. Enter each individual employee into the main frame by social security number. b. Complete the Cardkey Request Form CDC 0.834 and forward to Contractor. BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEN) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED {soul P2009453 Section 0154753 -- I Personnel Security Requirements c. Complete Credential Request Form CDC 0.113? and forward to Contractor. d. Initiate VMS Request for all Foreign National andl'or Naturalized Citizen Contractor employees. C. Once the Contractor employee has been both entered into the CDC Mainframe and the Personnel Security Processing Of?ce has received the Faxed E-QIP Form. the Personnel Security Processing Of?cer will contact (via phone) the employee to set up a PHASE I Appointment (Fingerprinting Appointment). Prior to the Phase I Appointment, the Contractor employee shall collectl'complete the following items and shall be prepared to present them at their Phase Appointment: 1. OF 306 (Declaration for Federal Employment) 2. Safety Survival Skills Training (Must have training certi?cate} 3. CDC Form 0834 (CDC Cardkey Request Form}. It should be noted that not all employees receive a Cardkey. The Contractor needs to inform the Personnel Security Specialist when a Cardkey is not required. 4. CDC Form 0.113? (CDC Credential Request Form) 5. Appropriate Identi?cation. Social Security Card. Visa, Green~Card. Picture ID D. CDC Safety Survival Skills Training. Contractor shall contact the Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative (Construction Manager) to discuss options for completing the required CDC Safety Survival Skills Training. 1. A Contractor employee is not required to be in the CDC Mainframe Commter before safety training may start. 2. Contractor employee may complete the CDC Safety Survival Skills Training requirement in one of two ways: 3. Attend instructional Education Training Class; offered twice a month on campus. b. Self-paced readlstudy and test. This is a PDF file that includes all material and a test. It can be provided via email PDF attachment by the Contracting Of?cer andror the Contracting Of?cer?s Technical Representative. The Contractor shall coordinate in order to complete this requirement. After completing the test, the Contractor should ax the testls) to Mr. Monty Moore. (404) 539?3439 (telephone) and (404)639-2294 (Fax for answer sheet). OHS will then send the Contractor the Certi?cate of Completion. E. Phase lAppointrnent: Fingerprinting 3: Initiation of SF-B5 Paperwork. Contractor personnel should report to the Personnel Security Processing Of?ce. at Building 21. Roybal Campus or the Yale Building. Koger Center for their Initiathhase Appointment. at the time and date scheduled with the Personal Security Specialist. When the Contractor's employee arrives for their Phase I Appointment. a Personnel Security Specialist will check all paperwork {in accordance with Paragraph 1.3.C. above) for completeness. If the forms are in order. the employee will be fingerprinted using digital ?ngerprint technology. which allows for rapid check and results from the National Criminal information Center database. 1. After the ?ngerprinting is complete. the personnel security specialist will collect the paperwork and issue the employee a receipt. indicating that NACI has been submitted and that ?ngerprint results will be completed within 72 consecutive hours. excluding weekends and federal holidays. It should be noted that the Cardkey Form (CDC Form 0.834} will be held at the Personnel Security Processing Of?ce and not forwarded for processing at the Cardkey Of?ce until after the ?ngerprint results come back approved. Thus although it takes roughly TZ-hours for return of ?ngerprint approval. on average. it could take an additional week to get the Cardkey back from the Cardkey Of?ce. For all employees. ?ngerprints must be cleared prior to the issuance of a CDC ID Badge (with or without Cardkey). SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION (SBLI) P2009453 HVAC: MODIFICATIONS FDRI I mere. session 2. BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 015414 Personnel Security Requirements Initiation of SF-BE Paperwork. (It is now a requirement for the to be completed on-line. Handwritten copies of this form are no longer accepted. initiation of each employee's SF-85 will be completed at the Phase I Appointment. This consists of inputting the employee's Name and and creation of a "Temporary Password? into the system. Once initiation has been completed, employees will be able to work and complete their SF-BS from any computer; at home, of?ce, etc.) F. Phase ll Appointment; Completion of SF-BE 3; Badge Pickrup. The Phase II Appointment will be scheduled by the Personnel Security Specialist during the Phase I Appointment. Note that when scheduling the Phase ll Appointment. consideration should be given to allow enough time for accurate completion of the SF-85 and complete processing of ?ngerprints (to include time required for the Card key Of?ce to create the new Cardkey}. The most important step for the employee bah-Jean the two appointments is completion of the SF-85. The Contractor employee's ?rst step in completing the SF- 85 on their own should be to change password information. Note that as previously stated a temporary password will be set up by the Physical Security Specialist and employee during the initiation of the SF-85, at the Phase I Appointment. Accuracy of the is extremely important. All items must be answered and timelines should be completed without time-gaps. Once complete, the SF-85 should be printed off but should not be signed. The employee should submit the entire SF-BS form electronically to the CDC Personnel Security Processing Of?ce. Employees should bring the unsigned signature page to their Phase ll Appointment. Any errors found on the during review can be corrected easily at the Phase Appointment by the employee, at which time a new signature page can be printed off. Note that case numbers are automatically assigned to SF-BE paperwork. Each page of an individual's SF-BE is assigned the same case number including the signature page. These numbers must match on all pages in order for the SF-85 to be accepted, processed, and badging delays avoided. For this reason, the employee should not sign the last page until it is reviewed and signature is approved by the Personnel Security Specialist during the Phase ll Appointment. Once the SF-35 is approved and signed by the employee, a Photo will be taken and the CDC ID Badge will be created. If the Cardkey Of?ce has returned the Cardkey to the Personnel Security Processing Of?ce, the ID Badge will be applied and the Badgel'Cardkey will be provided to the employee, thus concluding the process. In most cases, two appointments will be required to complete this process. In some cases however, where Cardkeys are delayed in their return from the Card key Of?ce, three appointmentsilrips may be required. Employees should note that the entire process will be complete at the end of the second appointment and that the third appointment will be used to simply issue the ID Badge and Cardkey. 1.4 Extension or Renewal of Cardkey andior Badge A. The extension or renewal of the Cardkey or badge will be coordinated through the Contracting Of?cer's Technical Representative (Construction Manager}. The renewal procedures are as follows: 1. 2. Contractor transmits list of employees to the Contracting Of?cer. All Contractor employees seeking extensionirenewal shall retake the CDC Safety Survival Skills Training Course, submit the examination and receive a new, updated Certificate of Completion. Upon receipt ofthe list of employees, CDC will perform the following tasks: a. Update each employee in the mainframe by social security number b. Complete an updated Cardkey Request Form CDC 0.834. c. Complete an updated Credential Request Form CDC 0.1137. BUT INFORMATJON (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) P2009453 Section 01547-5 (b18134? HVAC MODIFICATIONS I Personnel Security Requirements 262301} d. Transmit Forms 0.834 and 0.1137 to Contractor. 4. After successfully completing the Safety Survival Skills Training and gathering the required paperwork {identi?ed above, plus the apprOpriate identi?cation requirements). the Contractor or employee shall contact the Personnel Security Of?ce to schedule an appointment for ID renewal. 5. Security will then print out an updated identification badge form which will be attached to the existing Cardkey. B. The Contractor shall initiate the request for extension a minimum of three weeks prior to the expiration of the Cardkey or identi?cation badge to ensure work may continue uninterrupted on the project. If work has to be stopped because of the Contractor?s neglect in not renewing employees? Cardkey or identi?cation badges. the contract time shall not be extended. 1.5 Anticipated Time A. Each Contractor?s experience with the security process may differ because of varying number of employees and other situations. However. based on recent experiences. 10 hours per employee may be anticipated for the security process. The anticipated number of days to complete the security process is estimated at 20. B. The estimated number of days and time per employee by sequenced steps are listed below. Estimated Number Estimated Hours 5&2 Employee List 7' SF306ISF85 5 4 Safety TrainingiFlngerprinting 7 3 Identi?cation Badge 1 3 1.6 Restricted Areas A. The Contractor be informed of areas where construction personnel are permitted and areas considered restricted. if a Contractor?s employee is found in an area designated as restricted, the employee will immediately be permanently removed from the project site. Future access to the employee on any and all CDC projects will be denied. 1. The Contractor is responsible for the immediate replacement of the employee. 2_ Removal of the employee will not constitute a justi?able delay in the completion date of the project nor a claim for additional compensation. Return of Contract Documents A. Upon completion of the contract. the Contractor shall return all copies of the Contract Documents to the Contracting Of?cer. 1.8 Photographs A. The Contractor is not Ermitted to make photographs for a project portfolio on a CDC campus unless authorized by the Contracting Of?cer or CDC Of?ce of Physical Security. Other photography requires approval of the Contracting Of?cer and Of?ce of Physical Security prior to photographing. 1. The project's Construction Manager will have knowledge of the current requirements SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) imi?, :12 262th SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEU) P2009453 Section 01547-6 - I Personnel Security Requirements for photography requests and may provide assistance to the Contractor in initiating the process. PART 2 - NOT USED. PART 3 - NOT USED. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (strata uses 262ath} I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (sec) CDC P2009453 Section 01700-1 Contract Closeout SECTION 01700 CONTRACT CLOSEOUT PART 1. GENERAL 1.1 CONTRACT CLOSEOUT A. In order to achieve Final Acceptance and Contract Closeout, the Contractor shall understand this section and provide all requirements contained herein. 1.2 SUBMITTALS A. Submit in accordance with the requirements of Section 01300. the following: 1 Project as built documents. as they exist the day of Final Acceptance. 2 Operational and maintenance data. 3 Video tapes and DVDs of servicing, maintenance. and operational training meetings. 4. Warranties. 5. Spare parts and maintenance materials. 6 All keys to rooms. panels. elevators. and all other spaces and equipment. 7 Test and Balance (T318) report. 8 ma completed and certi?ed. 9. Commissioning Report as the report exists the day of Final Acceptance. 10. Complete commissioning test scripts. 11. Certi?ed Life Safety Code systems by OHS and FMEO. 12. Approved short circuit study and all settings completed. 13. Working and acceptable to Contracting Of?cer LAN for Cardkey and BAS. 14. Security accepted system. 1.3 PROJECT AS BUILT DOCUMENTS A. Maintain on site. one set of the following record documents. Record actual revisions to the Work as the revisions are completed: Contract Drawings. Speci?cations. Amendments. Contract Modi?cations and other amendments to the contract. Reviewed shop drawings. product data. and samples. Scope of Work (80W) or similar documents forming the basis of contract award for a SOC project. B. Store Record Documents separate from documents used for construction. C. Record information concurrent with construction progress. D. Speci?cations: Leginy mark and record at each product section description of actual products installed. including the following: 1. Manufacturer?s name and product model and number. 2. Product substitutions or attemates utilized. 3. Changes made by amendments and modifications. SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) coo P2009453 Section woo-2 FOR-I - -- - Contract Closeout lint?- :12 U5 Ila} E- As Built Documents and Shop Drawings: Leginy marl-c each item to record actual construction including: 1. Measured horizontal and vertical locations of underground utilities and appurtenances, referenced to permanent surface improvements. 2. Measured locations of internal utilities and appurtenances concealed in construction, referenced to visible and accessible features of the Work. 3. Field changes of dimension and detail. 4. Details not on original Contract Drawings. For Solution Order Concept (SOC) projects, the shop drawings, product data, and similar submittals may be the only drawings produced by the Contractor. Therefore, it is most important that such information be maintained and recorded in a clear and precise manner so that CDC may update existing record drawings. 1. As a minimum, the Contractor shall provide revisions to drawings or sketches provided by CDC to all work required under the contract. F. Submit documents to Contracting Of?cerfor review and acceptance prior to the ?nal Application for Payment. 1.4 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA A. Submit five (5) sets prior to final inspection, bound in 3?112 11 inch text pages, three side ring capacity expansion binders. Additionally, provide a CD Rom with all information as contained in final and acceptable printed version. 1. Prepare binder covers with printed title AND MAINTENANCE title of project, and subject matter of binder when multiple binders are required. 2. Contents: Prepare a Table of Contents for each volume, with each Product or system desoription identi?ed. type on 30 pound white bond paper. 3. Internally subdivide the binder contents with permanent page dividers, logically organized as described below; with tab titling clearly printed under reinforced laminated plastic tabs. 4. Part 1: Directory. listing names, addresses, and telephone numbers of Government, Contractor, Subcontractors, all lower tier subcontractors and materials and eq uipmerit sUp pliers. 5. Part 2: Operation and maintenance instructions, arranged by system and subdivided by specification section. For each category, identify names, addresses, and telephone numbers of Subcontractors and suppliers. Identify the following: - - Signi?cant design criteria. List of equipment. Parts list for each component. Operating instructions. Maintenance instructions for equipment and systems. Maintenance instructions for finishes, including recommended cleaning methods and materials and special precautions identifying detrimental agents. 6. Part 3: Project documents and certi?cates. including the following: a. Shop drawings and product data. b. Certificates. c. Photocopies of warranties and bonds. B. Submit one copy of completed volumes and one copy of each DVD in final form for acceptance 15 days prior to ?nal inspection. This copy will be returned after ?nal inspection, with Government comments. Revise content of documents as required priorto ?nal submittal. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION P2009453 Section circa-3 digit? I Contract Closeout C. Submit ?nal volumes and DVDs revised. within ten days after ?nal inspection and prior to ?nal Application for Payment. 1.5 VIDEO TAPING and DVDS A. Video Taping 1. All servicing. maintenance. and operational training meetings for the Government personnel as required by individual sections of the speci?cations shall be taped. The taping shall be done on a video format and transferred to DVD, or recorded directly onto a DVD. 2. The training sessions shall be video taped as scheduled on the site for the respective equipment manuals and including the Government personnel question and answer period. All taping equipment, video tapes. DVDs, and video taping personnel shall be provided by the Contractor. a. All video tapes shall be edited to reduce background noise and all questions and answers and lectures shall be edited for clarity. b. The transfer from tape to DVD shall be done so that all CDC computers are able to read the DVDs. b. All videos and DVDs shall be labeled with the name and date of the system or equipment being demonstrated. 8. Submit one copy of each DVD in ?nal form for acceptance 15 days prior to ?nal inspection. This copy will be returned after ?nal inspection. with Government comments. Revise content of documents as required prior to ?nal submittal of DVD. C. Submit ?nal and revised DVD, within ten days alter ?nal inspection and prior to final Application for Payment. 1.6 WARRANTIES A. Provide copies of warranties codified by manufacturer. B. Execute and assemble documents from Subcontractors, suppliers. and manufacturers. C. Provide Table of Contents and assemble in three side ring binder with durable cloth cover. Additionally, provide a CD Rom with all information as contained in printed version. D. Submit for acceptance prior to ?nal Application for Payment and. as required by Contracting Of?cer's review. revised submissions. E. For items of Work delayed beyond date of Final Acceptance. provide updated submittal within ten days after acceptance. listing date of acceptance as start of warranty period. SPARE PARTS AND MAINTENANCE MATERIALS A. Provide products. spare parts. maintenance and extra materials in quantities speci?ed in individual speci?cation sections. B. Deliver to project site and place in location as directed by the Contracting Of?cer: obtain receipt prior to Final Application for Payment. PART 2 - NOT USED. SENSITIVE aur UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION {sec} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION P2009453 Section 01700-4 2523.5 -- -- - I Contract Closeout PART 3 - NOT USED. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION USE. 262a(h} SENSITIVE our UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION {soul CDC P2009453 Section 01710-1 I meaning SECTION 017'10 CLEANING PART GENERAL 1.1 SAFETY REQUIREMENTS: A. C. Store volatile and toxic waste in covered metal containers. Remove from Project site daily. Provide adequate ventilation during use of volatile or toxic substances. Prohibited practices: 1. Allow no volatile or toxic wastes to accumulate on Project site. 2. Burning or burying of waste materials or rubbish on Project site unless required permits are obtained. 3. Disposal of volatile wastes such as mineral spirits. oil. or paint thinner in storm or sanitary drains. on pavements. in gutters or downspouts. or on Project site. 4. Disposal of waste or cleaning materials which contain materials harmful to plant growth on Project site. Clean up accidentally spilled materials as quickly as possible. 1.2 CLEAN-UP DURING CONSTRUCTION: A. Execute cleaning procedures daily to insure that building, Project site. and adjacent properties are maintained free from debris and rubbish. Wet down materials subject to blowing. Throwing waste materials from heights is prohibited. Provide covered. on-site containers for waste collection. Place all waste materials and rubbish in containers in an expeditious manner to prevent accumulation. Remove waste from Project site daily when containers become full. Legally dispose of all waste materials. rubbish. volatile materials. and cleaning materials off Project site. Clean and maintain interior spaces prior to start of ?nish painting in a "vacuum clean" state daily until Date of Substantial Completion. Protect newly ?nished and clean surfaces from contamination during cleaning operations. Accumulation of debris contributing to survival or spread of rodents. roaches. or other pests is prohibited. Remove debris containing food scraps on a daily basis. 2. Contractor shall be responsible for securing services of a pest exterminator at no additional cost to the Government. Disposal of materials in waterways is prohibited. Graf?ti or other similar distasteful comments or illustrations authored on any building BUT msosmnon (soul CDC P2009453 swam Hvac maniacmous FORI- .. - 42' LIE: 1.3 1.4 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED Cleaning materials used on Project are prohibited. Monitor Project for violations of this criteria, and if found, take appropriate action immediately to cover or replace defaced materials as necessary. Water intrusion and leaks, whether through the building envelope or arising from leaks in piping. plumbing, drains, or other mechanical systems. shall be immediately corrected and dried using accepted industry standards. If excessive moisture remains beyond 48 hours following the incident, appropriate strategies shall be employed to determine if microbial contamination is present, and take appropriate remedial steps following accepted industry guidelines to assure the structure is returned toa clean and dry condition. DAILY CLEAN UP: AI Clean all finished surfaces and the Project site thoroughly. The Project site must be ready for Government use during normal duty hours. Remove dust, debris, oils, stains, ?ngerprints and labels from exposed interior ?nish surfaces, including glazing materials. FINAL CLEAN UP: A. Clean all ?nished surfaces in accord with manufacturer's product data and requirements speci?ed in sections prior to Date of Final Acceptance. Perform all general and speci?c cleaning prior to request for Project or portion thereof to be inspected for Final Acceptance. Remove dust, debris, oils, stains, ?ngerprints and labels from exposed interior ?nish surfaces, including glazing materials. Replace, patch, and touch-up marred surfaces to match adjacent ?nishes. Replace materials which cannot be repaired or patched. Clean all glass at interior windows that work has been performed on in that area on all buildings. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) (more uses 262alfi1} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION i 02 5-1 Minor Demolition for Remodeling SECTION 02225 MINOR DEMOLITION FOR REMODELING PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 SUMMARY A. Section includes the following: Demolishing designated building equipment and fixtures. Demolishing designated construction. Demolishing, disconnecting and capping designated utilities. Cutting and alterations for completion of the Work. Protecting items designated to remain. Removing demolished materials. GENERAL A. The following standards listed below form a part of the speci?cation: 1. 29 CFR Part 1926 Subpart - Demolition [1926.850 1926.860] 2. ANSI A1064 990: Safety Requirements for Demolition Operations 3. 40 CF 82-03: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone B. Do not begin demolition until authorization is received from the Contracting Of?cer. Remove rubbish and debris from the project site; do not allow excessive accumulations. Store material that cannot be removed daily in areas specified by the Contracting Of?cer. SUBMITTALS A. Demolition Plan: Submit proposed salvage. demolition, and removal procedures to the Contracting Of?cer for approval before work is started. Demolition Plan shall include. but is not limited to. addressing topics as listed below: 1. Structures 2. Utilities and Related equipment 3. Paving and Slabs 4. Roo?ng 5. Masonry 6. Concrete B. Disposal Permits: Obtain necessary permits in conjunction with treatment and disposition of oil? contaminated soil. and submit the permits to the Contracting Officer. (3. Proposed noise-control measures: Coordinate with Government to establish noise control criteria. CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS A. Section 01700: requirements for submittals. 8. Project Record Documents: Accurately record actual locations of capped utilities. concealed utilities discovered during demolition, and subsurface obstructions. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ BUILDING INFORMATION .gyg- 49 c. c? P2009453 SECIIOH again" If HVAC..MODIEICATIDNS FOR-I - I Minor Demolition for Remodeling 1.5 MATERIALS OWNERSHIP A. Except for item or materials indicated to be reusedt salvaged, reinstalled. or otherwise indicated to remain the Government?s preperty, demolished materials shall become the Contractor?s property and shall be removed from the site with further disposition at the Contractor's option. Every opportunity to recycle demolished materials shall be made bythe Contractor. Conform to local regulations and environmental regulations for disposal of debris. 1.6 REGULATORY AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS: A. Comply with federal and local hauling and disposal regulations and all standards listed elsewhere within these speci?cations. QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Demolition Firm Quali?cations: Engage an experienced ?rm that has successfully completed demolition work similar to that indicated for this Project El. Regulatory Requirements: Comply with governing EPA notification regulations before starting demolition. Comply with hauling and disposal regulations of authorities having jurisdiction. 1.5 PROJECT CONDITIONS A. The Government will occupy portions of the facility and site immediately adjacent to demolition area. Conduct demolition so that disruption of the Government's operations will be minimized. Provide not less than 72 hours notice to the Government of activities that will affect use of the facility by the Government. B. The Government assumes no responsibility for actual condition of items to be demolished. 1. Conditions existing at time of inspection for proposal will be maintained by the Government as fares practical. 2. After the project is begun, the Contractor is responsible for the condition of items to be demolished. The Government does not warrant that the condition of items to be demolished will not have changed since the time of inspection for proposal. 1.9 DUST AND DEBRIS CONTROL: A. Prevent the spread of dust and debris to adjacent occupied buiidings and areas, and avoid the creation of a nuisance (or hazard} in the surrounding area. B. Do not use water if it results in hazardous or objectionable conditions such as, but not limited to. ice, ?ooding, or pollution. 1.10 PROTECTION A. Traf?c Control Signs: Where pedestrian and driver safety is endangered in area of removal work, use (person who directs traf?c). or barricades. Barricades must have ?ashing lights if used after 6:00pm and before 8:00am. Notify the Contracting Officer prior to beginning such work. El. Existing Work: Protect existing work which is to remain in place, be reused. or remain the property of Government. Repair items which are to remain and which are damaged during the performance or? their work to their original condition. or replace with new. Provide new supports SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION (moi-42 CDC P2009453 Section 02225-3 Minor Demolition for Remodeling and reinforcement for existing construction weakened by demolition or removal work. Repairs, reinforcement, or structural replacement must have Contracting Of?cers approval. C. Weather Protection: For the portions of the structures to remain. protect building interior and materials and equipment from the weather at all times. Where removal of existing roo?ng is necessary to accomplish work, have materials and workmen ready to provide adequate and temporary covering of exposed areas so as to ensure effectiveness and the prevent displacement. 1.11 BURNING: Burning will not be permitted. 1.12 RELOCATION 8: Perform the removal and reinstallation of relocated items as indicated with workmen skilled in the trades involved. Repair items to be relocated which are damaged or replace damaged items with new undamaged items as approved by the Contracting Officer. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 REPAIR MATERIALS A. Use repair materials identical to existing materials 1. Where identical materials for exposed surfaces are unavailable or cannot be used. use materials that visually match existing adjacent surfaces to the fullest extent possible. 2. Use materials whose installed performance equal or surpass that of existing materials. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. Verify that utilities have been disconnected, rerouted. capped, andfor sealed. B. insofar as is practicable, arrange operations to reveal unknown or concealed structural conditions for examination and veri?cation before removal or demolition. C. When unanticipated mechanical. electrical, or structural elements or conditions that con?ict with the intended function or design are encountered. investigate and measure the nature and extent of the con?ict. submit a written report to the Government. D. Survey the condition of the site to determine whether removing any element might result in structural de?ciency. overloading, failure, or unplanned collapse of any portion of the building or adjacent structures during demolition. E. Perform continuing surveys as the work progresses to detect hazards resulting from demolition or construction activities. 3.2 UTILITY SERVICES A. Maintain existing utilities indicated to remain in service and protect them against damage during selective demolition operations. 1. Do not interrupt existing utilities serving occupied or operating facilities, except when authorized in writing by Government and authorities having jurisdiction. Provide temporary sennces during intermptions to existing utilities, as acceptable to Government and to SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION rseuI BUILDING INFORMATION coo P2009453 . I (bit; :12 U5 C: 2: B. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION INFORMATION Section 02225-4 Minor Demolition for Remodeling governing authorities. Provide not less than 72 hours notice to Government if shutdown of service is required during changeover. Utility Requirements: Locate. identify, disconnect, and seal or cap off indicated utility services serving building to be demolished. 1. Arrange to shut off indicated utilities with utility companies 2. Where utility companies are required to be removed, relocated, or abandoned, provide bypass connections to maintain continuity or service to other pa ris of the building proceeding with demolition. 3. Cutoff pipe or conduit in walls-or partitions to be removed. Cap, valve, or plug and seal the remaining portion of pipe or conduit after bypassing. C. Identify location of capped utilities on'project record documents. 3.3 PREPARATION A. Protect existing trees and appurtenances which are not to be demolished. B. Marl-r Location of utilities. C. Inspect job for conditions which would prevent satisfactory execution of this work and for conditions at variance with Drawings. Do not proceed until these conditions are corrected or resolved. D. Drain, purge, or otherwise remove, collect. and dispose of chemicals, gases, explosives. acids, ?am mables. or other dangerous materials, if any, before proceeding with demolition operation E. Conduct demolition operations and remove debris to ensure minimum interference with roads, streets, walks, and other adjacent occupied and used facilities. 1. Do not close or obstruct streets, walks, or other adjacent occupied or used facilities without permission from Government and authorities having jurisdiction. Provide alternate routes around closed or obstructed traf?c ways if required by governing regulations or if indicated on Contract Documents. 3.4 POLLUTION CONTROLS A. Use temporary enclosures and other suitable methods to limit the spread of dust and dirt. Comply with governing environmental protection regulations. 1. Do not use water when it may damage existing construction or create hazardous or objectionable conditions, such as ice, ?ooding, and pollution. Remove and transport debris in a manner that will prevent spillage on adjacent surfaces and reas. ?l . Remove debris from elevated portions of building by chute, hoists, or other device that will convey debris to grade level. Clean adjacent structures and improvements of dust, dirt, and debris caused by demolition operations. Return adjacent areas to condition existing before start of demolition. 3.5 DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) - BUILDING INFORMATION coc P2009453 I (more uses 252a:th 3.6 3.7 BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION - BUILDING INFORMATION Section 02295-5 Minor Demolition for Remodeling A. Conduct demolition to minimize interference with adjacent occupancies. B. Do not permit demolition equipment on areas outside the Limits of Work. No heavy equipment on tracks shall be permitted on paved areas outside the Limits of Work. C. Implement Debris and Dust Control procedures as approved. If water is used. contractor shall provide hoses for this purpose. D. Remove. cap. andlor reroute identi?ed utilities within Limits of Work. as noted in the Contract Documents or as identi?ed bythe Contractor. Utilities are to terminate in a manner conforming to the nationally recognized code severing the speci?c utility and approved by the Contracting Of?cer. E. Continuously clean-up and remove demolished materials from site. Do not allow materials to accumulate on the site. I. Do not burn or bury materials on site. Do not leave materials on site except as part of an approved recycling plan. Leave site in clean condition PATCHING: Where removals leave holes and damaged surface exposed in the ?nished work. patch and repair these holes and damaged surfaces to match adjacent ?nished surfaces. Where newworlt is to be applied to existing surfaces. perform removals and patching in a manner to produce surfaces suitable for receiving new work. Finished surfaces of patched area shall be ?ush with the adjacent existing surface and shall match the existing adjacent surface as closely as possible as to texture and ?nish. Patching shall include: A. Holes and depressions left as a result of removals in existing masonry walls to remain shall be completely ?lled with an approved masonry patching material. applied in accordance with the manufacturer?s printed instructions. 0F A. Title to Materials: Except where Speci?ed in other sections. all materials and equipment removed. and not reused. shall become the property of the Contractor and shall be removed from Government property unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the Government in accordance with the accepted reCycling plan. Title of materials resulting from demolition. and from materials and equipment to be removed. is vested in the Contractor upon approval by the Contracting Officer of the Contractor's demolition and removal procedures. and authorization by the Contracting Of?cer to begin demolition. The Government will not be responsible for the condition or loss of. or damage to. such property after notice to proceed. Material and equipment shall not be viewed by prospective purchasers or sold on the site. B. Salvaged Materials and Equipment: Remove materials and equipment that are to be removed by the Contractor and that are to remain on the property of the Government. and deliver to a storage site as directed by the Government. The Government maintains the right to direct the Contractor to salvage any materials or equipment during the entire duration of the project. C. Recycling 1 Pursuant to Executive Order 13101. Greening the Government ihmugn Waste Prevention. Recycling. and Federal Acquisition. CDC is committed to recycling. CDC encourages the BUT UNCLASSIFIED mronmnorv issui BUiLomo INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (BED) INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section 02225-6 2623?: HVAG..MODIFICATIGN5 FOR-I - I Minor Demolition for Remodeling reduction of construction and demolition waste by reducing debris, reusing materials, and recycling. 2 Contractor shall include in the initial proposal a Construction Waste Management Plan for the reuse, recycling, redirection, and other diversions from a landfill of construction wastes and demolition during construction activities. This plan shall be evaluated by the CDC Project Of?cer, and if deemed acceptable, shall be implemented upon approval by the Contracting Of?cer. 3 The Contractor shall submit documentation on a weekly basis for each item on the Waster Management Plan. 4 The Contractor shall meet, as a minimum, the USGBC LEED Reference Guide for Green Building Design and Construction, Materiais and Resources Credit 2 Construction waste Management, latest edition. This guide requires at least 50% of non hazardous construction waste to be recycled or salvaged. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION CDC P2009453 2622301} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION Section 04065-1 Masonry Mortar and Grout SECTION 04065 MASONRY MORTAR AND GROUT PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 SECTION INCLUDES A. Mortar for masonry. B. Grout for masonry. RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 04810 Unit Masonry Assemblies B. Section 08115 - Standard Steell Frames REFERENCES A. ACI SSOIASCE 511' MS 402 - Building Code Requirements For Masonry Structures; American Concrete Institute International. 3. 530.1IASCE Sfl? MS 802 - Speci?cation for Masonry Structures: American Concrete Institute Intamational. C. ASTM 144 - Standard Speci?cation for Aggregate for Masonry Mortar. D. ASTM 150 - Standard Speci?cation for Portland Cement. E. ASTM 207 - Standard Speci?cation for Hydrated Lime for Masonry Purposes. F. ASTM 27"0 - Standard Speci?cation for Mortar for Unit Masonry. G. ASTM 404 - Standard Speci?cation for Aggregates for Masonry Grout. H. ASTM 476 - Standard Speci?cation for Grout for Masonry. I. ASTM 780 - Standard Test Method for Preconstruction and Construction Eyatuation of Mortars for Plain and Reinforced Unit Masonry. J. ASTM 1019 - Standard Test Method for Sampling and Testing Grout. K. IMIAWC (CW) Recommended Practices Guide Speci?cations for Cold Weather Masonry International Masonry Industry Ali-Weather Council. L. IMIAWC (HW) - Recommended Practices 8- Guide Speci?cations for Hot Weather Masonry Construction; International Masonry Industry All-Weather Council. A. See Section 01300 - Submittals, for submittal procedures. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION coc P2009453 HMAGMODIEIGAT-IONS-FORI - - I USA1031 332th F. G. 1.05 A. 1.06 A. 1.07 A. El. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ BUILDING INFORMATION Section 04065-2 Masonry Mortar and Grout Product Data: Inciude design mix and indicate whether the Proportion or Property speci?cation of ASTM 2?0 is to be used. Also include required environmental conditions and admixture limitations. Samples: Submit samples of mortar, illustrating mortar color and color range. Reports: Submit reports on mortar indicating conformance of mortar to property requirements of ASTM 27'0 and test and evaluation reports per ASTM TED. Reports: Submit reports on grout indicating conformance of component grout materiais to requirements of ASTM 4T6 and test and evaluation reports to ASTM 1019. Man ufacturer's Certificate: Certify that products meet or exceed speci?ed requirements. Manufacturer's Instructions: Submit packaged dry mortar manufacturer?s installation instructions. QUALITY ASSURANCE Comply with provisions of SSOIASCE 402 and ACI 6ft MS 602, except where exceeded by requirements of the contract documents. DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING Maintain packaged materials clean. dry. and protected against dampness. freezing, and foreign matter. ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Cold Weather Requirements: Comply with recommendations of IMIAWC (CW). Hot Weather Requirements: Comply with IMIAWC (HW). PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 A. E. 2.02 A. MATERIALS Portland Cement; ASTM 150. Type standard gray color. Hydrated Lime: ASTM 20?: Type S. Mortar Aggregate: ASTM 144. Grout Aggregate: ASTM 404. 1. .Coarse Aggregate: Maximum size; No. 8. 2. Fine Aggregate: Maximum size; No. 1. Water: Clean and potable. MORTAR MIXES Mortar for Unit Masonry: ASTM 2?0. Property Specification. 1. Interior, non?loadbearing masonry: Type N. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION - BUILDING INFORMATION coo P2009453 (mom uses 262ainl 2.03 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) - INFORMATION Section 04065-3 Masonry Mortar and Grout MORTAR MIXING A. mean Thoroughly mix mortar ingredients using mechanical batch mixer. in accordance with ASTM 270 and in quantities needed for immediate use. Maintain sand unifome damp immediately before the mixing process. Do not use anti-freeze compounds to lower the freezing point of mortar. If water is lost by evaporation. re-temper only within two hours of mixing. Use mortar within two hours after mixing at temperatures of 90 degrees F. or two-and-one- half hours at temperatures under 40 degrees F. 2.04 GROUT MIXES 2.05 A. Mix in accordance with ASTM 476: 3.000 psi strength at 28 days: 8-10 inches slump. 1. Fine grout for spaces with smallest horizontal dimension of 2 inches or less. 2. Coarse grout for spaces with smallest horizontal dimension greater than 2 inches. GROUT MIXING A. Thoroughly mix grout ingredients in quantities needed for immediate use in accordance with ASTM 476 for ?ne and coarse grout. Add admixtures in accordance with manufacturer's instructions; mix uniformly. Do not use anti-freeze compounds to lower the freezing point of grout. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 3.02 3.03 PREPARATION A. Plug clean-out holes for grouted masonry with block masonry units. Brace masonry to resist wet grout pressure. INSTALLATION A. B. C. D. E. Install mortar. grout and anchoring cement as speci?ed in other sections. Comply with man ufacturei?s product data. Work grout into masonry cores and cavities to eliminate voids. Do not install grout in lifts greater than 16 inches without consolidating grout by rodding. Do not displace reinforcement while placing grout. Remove excess mortar from grout spaces. GROUTING A. Perform all grouting by means of low-lift technique. Do not employ high-lift grouting. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section 04065-4 abstainMasonry Mortar and Grout 1. Limit height of pours to 12 inches. 2. Limit height of masonryr to 16 inches above each pour. 3. Pour grout only after vertical reinforcing is in place; place horizontal reinforcing as grout is poured. Prevent displacement of bars as grout is poured. 4. Place grout for each pour continuously and consolidate immediately; do not interrupt pours for more than 1-12 hours. 3.04 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. An independent testing agency will perform ?eld tests, in accordance with provisions of Section 01400 - Quality Control Procedures. 3. Test and evaluate mortar in accordance with ASTM 780 procedures. C. Test and evaluate grout in accordance with ASTM 1019 procedures. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION (b}[3}242 USE. 262ath} SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION (SBU) Unit Masonry Assemblies SECTION 04810 UNIT MASONRY ASSEMBLIES PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Concrete Block. B. Reinforcement and Anchorage. C. Accessories. 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 04065 Mortar and Masonry Grout. 8. Section 07900 - Joint Seaiers 1.03 REF ERENCES A. ACI 53UIASCE SIT MS 402 - Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures; American Concrete Institute International. B. ACI SIT MS 602 Speci?cation For Masonry Structures; American Concrete Institute International. C. ASTM A 82 - Standard Speci?cation for Steel Wire. Plain. for Concrete Reinforcement. D. ASTM A 153m 153M - Standard Speci?cation for Zinc Coating (Hot-Dip} on Iron and Steel Hardware. E. ASTM A 240m 240M - Standard Specification for Heat-Resisting Chromium and Chromium- Nickel Stainless Steel Plate. Sheet. and Strip for Pressure Vessels. F. ASTM A 5153*. 615M - Standard Speci?cation for Deformed and Plain Billet-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement. G. ASTM 90 - Standard Specification for Loadbearing Concrete Masonry Units. H. ASTM 91 - Standard Speci?cation for Masonry Cement. ASTM 129 - Standard Speci?cation for Nonloadbearing Concrete Masonry Units. J. ASTM 140 - Standard Test Methods of Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units and Related Units. K. ASTM 150 - Standard Speci?cation for Portland Cement. ASTM 20? - Standard Speci?cation for Hydrated Lime for Masonry Purposes. M. ASTM 270 - Standard Speci?cation for Mortar for Unit Masonry. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ CDC P2009453 HVAC. .MODIEIGATIQNS F0 R1 I IIJIIBI 4? U2 '3 262mb 1.04 1.05 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 04810-2 Unit Masonry Assemblies N. ASTM 404 Standard Speci?cation for Aggregates for Masonry Grout. O. ASTM 4?6 - Standard Speci?cation for Grout for Masonry. P. ASTM 780 - Standard Test Method for Preconstruction and Construction Evaluation of Mortars for Plain and Reinforced Unit Masonry. Q. ASTM 226 - Standard Speci?cation for Asphalt-Saturated Organic Felt Used in Roo?ng and Waterproofing. R. IMIAWG (CW) - Recommended Practices 3; Guide Speci?cations for Cold Weather Masonry Construction; international Masonry industry Ail-Weather Council. S. IMIAWC (HW) - Recommended Practices Guide Speci?cations for Hot Weather Masonry Construction; International Masonry Industry All-Weather Council. T. SMACNAIASMM) - Architectural Sheet Metal Manual; Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors' National Association. U. 12 - Cold Applied Asphalt Mastic [Extra Thick Film}; Society for Protective Coatings. V- UL (FRD) - Fire Resistance Directory: Underwriters Laboratories Inc. SUBMITTALS A. See Section 01300 - Administrative Requirements, for submittal procedures. B. Product Data: Provide data for masonry units, fabricated wire reinforcement, and accessories. Indicate fastener type and length for each installation condition. Indicate corrosion protection for each item including fasteners. C. Shop Drawings: Detail fabrication, bending and placement of reinforcing bars. Follow ACI 301, showing bar schedules, stirrup spacing, diagrams of bent bars, and arrangement of masonry reinforcement. D. Samples: 1. Submit four samples of block units to illustrate color, texture, and extremes of color range. 2. Samples of reinforcement, and accessories. E. lnfonnationalSubmittais: 1. Material Test Results (By Testing Laboratory): Indicate and interpret results of tests speci?ed under Field Quality Control. See Part 3 of this Section. 2. Material Certi?cates, signed by manufacturers certifying compliance with specified requirements: a. Each type of masonry unit. Include test data, measurements, and calculations establishing net area compressive strength of masonry units, moisture content and linear drying shrinkage. b. Time-rated, ?re-resistant masonry units certified by manufacturer to comply with mix design and equivalent thickness requirements of UL for time ratings indicated. QUALITY ASSURANCE SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) cor: P2009453 I [bif3ii42 U.S.C. 262301} 1.06 1.0? A. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED Section 04810-3 Unit Masonry Assemblies Comply with provisions of ACI SSOIASCE SITMS 402 and ACI 602. except where exceeded by requirements of the contract documents. Manufacturer?s Quali?cation: Manufacturer of time-rated. ?re-resistant masonry units shall be quali?ed in writing by Underwriters Laboratories. Inc. for manufacture of ?re-rated units. DELIVERY. STORAGE. AND HANDLING A. Deliver. handle. and store masonry units by means that will prevent mechanical damage and contamination by other materials. Keep masonry materials dry. off ground and under covering. Allow air circulation around stacked units. Protect units from staining and physical damage. Segregate pallets of various ?re-rated units from each other and from other non-rated units; maintain clear indication of rating of stored units for easy identi?cation and selection. Deliver reinforcement and accessories in bundles or boxes with waterproof tags. Maintain tags attached until material is incorporated into work. Deliver and handle materials to prevent damage or weakening. Prevent accumulation of wet or debris on reinforcement accessories during storing. Store off ground and under cover. ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS A. El. Cold-Weather Requirements: 1. Do not use frozen materials or materials mixed or coated with ice or frost. Do not build on frozen substrates. Remove and replace unit masonry damaged by frost or by freezing conditions. Comply with recommendations of IMIAWC (CW). 2. Lay no masonry when temperature of surrounding air has drapped below 45 degrees F. unless it is rising. and at no time when it has dropped below 40 degrees F. except with written permission from Contracting Of?cer. 3. When masonry work is authorized at temperatures below 40 degrees but above freezing. provide mortar at temperature between 70 degrees and 100 degrees F. Maintain air temperature above 40 degrees on both sides of masonry for ?2 hours after laying. 4. Cold-Weather Cleaning: Use liquid cleaning methods only when air temperature is 40 degrees and above and will remain so until masonry has dried. but not less than 7 days after completing cleaning. Hot-Weather Requirements: 1. Protect unit masonry work when temperature and humidity conditions produce excessive evaporation of water from mortar and grout. Provide arti?cial shade and wind breaks and use cooled materials as required. Comply with IMIAWC (HW). 2. When ambient temperature exceeds 100 degrees F. or 90 degrees with a wind velocity greater than 8 mph. do not spread mortar beds more than 48 inches ahead of masonry. Set masonry units within one minute of spreading mortar. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS A. Concrete Block: Comply with referenced standards and as follows: SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEU) coc P2009453 Section 04310?4 Edith?? I Unit Masonry Assemblies 1. Size: Standard units with nominal face dimensions of 8 16 inches and nominal depths as indicated on the drawings for specific locations. 2. Special Shapes: Provide non-standard blocks configured for lintels (U block}, control joint edges, and other detailed conditions. Provide bullnose units for outside corners, unless otherwise indicated. 3. LoadaBearing Units: ASTM St]. normal weight. Type II. a. Hollow block, as indicated. b. Exposed faces: Manufacturer?s standard color and texture where indicated. c. Aggregate: ASTM 331. normal weight. 4. Non-Loadbearing Units: ASTM 129r lightweight. Type II. a. Hollow block. as indicated. b. Aggregate: ASTM 331. lightweight. 5. CMU forAnimal Areas: ASTM 90, normal weight. Type II. a. Hollow block, as indicated. Fine textured. smooth surfaced. c. Aggregate: ASTM 33, normal weight aggregates; ASTM 331, lightweight aggregates; expanded shale1 clay or slate manufactured by rotary kiln method. 6. Fire Rated Units: Manufacture 8 inch or larger units to meet all of the requirements for two (2) hours or better (as required), including full scale ?re test reports, ASTM E-119. All 4 inch and 6 inch units shall conform to NBC and NRC full scale fire test reports. 2.02 REINFORCEMENT AND ANCHORAGE A. Manufacturers: 1. Basis of Design: Hohmann 8; Barnard, Inc. 2. Dur?D-Wal. 3. Masonry Reinforcing Corporation of America. B. Reinforcing Steel: ASTM A 615% 615M Grade 60 deformed billet bars: uncoated. C. Single _Wythe Joint Reinforcement: Truss type; ASTM A 82 steel wire, hot dip galvanized after fabrication to ASTM A 153m. 153M, Class B: 0.1483 inch side rods with 0.1433 inch cross rods; width as required to provide not more than 1 inch and not less than 122 inch of mortar coverage on each exposure. D. Flexible Anchors: 2rpiece anchors that permit differential movement between masonry and building frame. 1. Concrete frame: Dovetail anchors of bent steel strap, 3M 7 inch size 12 gage thick, with triangular wire ties 0.13% inch thick, hot dip galvanized to ASTM A 153% 153M, Class 8-2. 2. Steel frame: Crimped wire anchors for welding to frame, 0.25 inch thick. with triangular wire ties 0.18?5 inch thick. hotde galvanized to ASTM A 153M. Class 132. E. Anchors and Ties to Structural Steel: 1. Anchors: No. 360 12 gage. Gripst?ay Channels, welded to structural steel. Hot dip galvanized at exterior walls; mill galvanized at other locations. 2. Ties: No. 363-BT Flexible Gripstay Anchor with 12 gage and F. Dovetail Slots and Ties to Concrete: 1. DovetailSlot: No. 305. 22 gage. 2. Ties: No. Flexible Dovetail ties with 12 gage dovetail and; steel. At corner columns, provide anchors using 114 inch wire ties rather than standard 31'16 inch wire ties. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION coc P2009453 I G. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 04810-5 Unit Masonry Assemblies Anchors To Transverse Masonry; Corners and Intersections: 1. Load Bearing Walls: 1.14 inch steel bar. minimum 24 inches long with 2 inch right angle bend on each end. hot dip galvanized to ASTM A 153m 153M. Class B. 2. Non?Load Bearing Walls: 23 gage 1i4 inch steel mesh. minimum 24 inches long. 1 inch less than wall width. ACCESSORIES A. Preformed Control Joints: Rubber material. Provide with corner and tee accessoriea. fused joints. For use at non-?re rated construction only. 1. Dur-O-Wal; Product Rapid Control Joint WA 2001. 2. Heckmann Building Products. Inc; Product No. 352 Control Joints. 3. Hohrnann 8: Barnard. Inc: Product RS Series Rubber Control Joint. Joint Filler: Closed cell neoprene: oversized 50 percent to joint width: self expanding; width to permit joint sealing between masonry and building structure. For use at non-?re rated construction only. 1. Dur?O?Wal; Product Rapid Expansion Joint Bra 2010 or 0m 2015. 2. Hohmann 8. Bernard. Inc; Product NS - Closed Cell Neoprene Sponge. Reinforcing Bar Positioners: Minimum 9 gage steel wire. 1. Dur-O-Wal; DIA 812. 2. Heckmann Building Products, Inc; Product No. 37?. 3. Masonry Reinforcing Corporation of America: 4301. Powder Actuated Fasteners: Hilti. Inc. Fasteners". Cavity Wall Mortar Trap: Polyethylene or nylon mesh in trapezoidal con?guration. One inch thick by 16 inches high. "Mortar Net". Wire Mesh Hardware Cloth: 1r2 inch by 16 gage steel mesh. 2 inches less than wall width by 15 inches long minimum. Hot dip galvanized to ASTM A 153. Class 3-2. Cold Galvanizing Compound: Pro-mixed. organic zinc liquid containing 90 percent zinc in dried ?lm. Brite Products. Brite Zinc. Cleaning Solution: Non-acidic. not harmful to masonry work or adjacent materials. 1. Diedrich Technologies, Inc.. 200 Lime Solv. 2. ProSoCo. H. D. Concrete Cleaner. Field Set Steel Rods: diameter smooth steel rods. set in epoxy with plastic cap sleeves. PART 3 - EXECUTION EXAMINATION A. Verify that ?eld conditions are acceptable and are ready to receive masonry. B. Verify that related items provided under other sections are properly sized and located. C. Verify that built-in items are in proper location. and ready for roughing into masonry work. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) .- CDC P2009453 Section 0431043 sat i .MQDIEICAIIONS FOR I -- Unit Masonry Assemblies 3.02 PREPARATION A. Direct and coordinate placement of metal anchors suppiied for installation under other sections. B. Provide temporary bracing during installation of masonry work. Maintain in place until building structure provides permanent bracing. 3.03 INSTALLATION - GENERAL A. Establish lines. levels and coursing. Protect from disturbance. B. Build chases and recesses to accommodate items speci?ed in this Section and other Sections. 0. Leave openings for equipment to be installed before completing masonry. After installing equipment. complete masonry to match the construction immediater adjacent to the opening. Cut masonry units with motor-driven saws to provide clean, sharp, unchipped edges. Cut units as required to provide a continuous pattern and to fit adjoining construction- Where possible, use full-size units without cutting. Allow units out with water-cooled saws to dry before placing. unless wetting of units is specified. Install cut units with cut surfaces and. where possible1 cut edges concealed. E. Temporarily brace masonry during erection. and until building structure provides permanent bracing. F. When both sides of a wall will be eXposed in the ?nished work, install masonry from scaffolding erected on both sides of wall. 3.04 COURSING A. Establish lines, levels, and coursing indicated. Protect from displacement. B. Maintain masonry courses to uniform dimension. Form vertical and horizontal jointsof uniform thickness. (3. Concrete Masonry Units: 1. Bond: Running. 2. Coursing: One unit and one mortar joint to equal 5 inches. 3. Mortar Joints: Concave1 except where flush joints are speci?ed. 3.05 PLACING AND BONDING A. Lay hollow masonry units with face shell bedding on head and bed joints. Buttering corners ofjoints or excessive furrowing of mortarjoints is not permitted. . Remove excess mortar as work progresses. D. Interlock intersections and external corners. Do not shift or tap masonry units after mortar has achieved initial set. Where adjustment must be made. remove mortar and replace. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SEU) coo P2009453 I USE. 252801} 3.06 3.07 3.03 3.09 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 04810-7 Unit Masonry Assemblies Perform job site cutting of masonry units with proper tools to provide straight. clean, unchipped edges. Prevent broken masonry unit comers or edges. Cut mortar joints flush when totally concealed and where wall tile. resilient base. or epoxy. high-perfonnance. or special coating is scheduled. Isolate top joint of masonry partitions from horizontal structural framing members and slabs or decks with compressible joint filler. REINFORCEMENT AND ANCHORAGE A. install horizontal joint reinforcement 16 inches on center. B. Place masonry joint reinforcement in first and second horizontal joints above and below openings. Extend minimum 16inches each side of opening. C. Place continuous joint reinforcement in ?rst and second joint below top of walls. D. Lap joint reinforcement ends minimum 8 inches. LINTELS A. Install reinforced unit masonry [intels over openings. 1. Openings from 24 inches to 78 inches: Place two. No. 5 reinforcing bars 1 inch from bottom web. 2. Do not splice reinforcing bars. 3. Support and secure reinforcing bars from displacement. Maintain position within inch of dimensioned position. 4. Place and consolidate grout fill without displacing reinforcing. 5. Allow masonry lintels to attain speci?ed strength before removing temporary supports. 3. Maintain minimum eiht inch bearing on each side of opening. GROUTED COMPONENTS A. 8. Lap splices minimum 48 bar diameters. Support and secure reinforcing bars from displacement. Maintain position within inch of dimensioned position. Place and consolidate grout ?ll without displacing reinforcing. At bearing locations, ?ll masonry cores with grout for a minimum 12 inches either side of opening. CONTROL AND EXPANSION JOINTS Do not continue horizontal joint reinforcement through control and expansion joints. Form control joint with a sheet building paper bond breaker ?tted to one side of the hollow contour and of the block unit. Fill the resultant core with grout fill. Rake joint at exposed unit faces for placement of backer rod and sealant. SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION (SEU) CDC P2009453 .. I Inna-4: 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 C. D. SENSITIVE our UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (sou: Section 04810-8 Unit Masonry Assemblies Install preformed control joint device in continuous Seal butt and corner joints in accordance with manufacturer?s instructions. Size control joint in accordance with Section 07900 for sealant performance. WORK A. D. As work progresses, install built-in metal door frames, glazed frames, and window frames and other items to be built into the work and furnished under other sections. Install built-in items plumb, level. and true to line. Bed anchors of metal door and glazed frames in adjacent mortar joints. Fill frame voids solid with grout. Fill adjacent masonry cores with grout minimum 12 inches from framed openings. Do not build into masonry construction organic materials that are subject to deterioration. TOLERANCES F. Maximum Variation From Unit to Adjacent Unit: 1016 inch. Maximum Variation from Plane of Wall: 114 inch in 10 It and 1f2 inch in 20 ft or more. Maximum Variation from Plumb: 1M inch in 20 ft: inch maximum. Maximum Variation from Level Coursing: 1M inch in 20 ft; ?le inch maximum. Maximum Variation of Joint Thickness: 1I8 inch in 3 ft, with maximum thickness limited to 1f2 inch. Do not varyjoint thickness of adjacent courses by more than its inch. Maximum Variation from Cross Sectional Thickness of Wells: 1:4 inch. AND FITTING A. Cut and ?t for chases, pipesI conduit, and sleeves. Coordinate with other sections of work to provide correct size, shape. and location. Obtain approval prior to cutting or ?tting masonry work not indicated or where appearance or strength of masonry work may be impaired. FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. An independent testing agency will perform ?eld quality control tests, as specified in Section 01400. Mortar Tests: Test each type of mortar in accordance with ASTM ?80, testing with same frequency as masonry samples. CLEANING A. B. C. Remove excess mortar and mortar smears as work progresses. Replace defective mortar. Match adjacent work. Clean soiled surfaces with cleaning solution. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) coo 92009453 I 262alh} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 04810-9 Unit Masonry Assemblies D. Use non-metallic tools in cleaning operations. 3.15 PROTECTION OF FINISHED WORK A. Protection of Masonry: During construction. cover tops of waits. projections. and sills with waterproof sheeting at end of each day's wont. Cover partially completed masonry when construction is not in progress. B. Stain Prevention: Prevent grout. mortar. and soil from staining the face of masonry to be left exposed or painted. immediately remove grout, mortar. and soil that come in contact with such masonry. 1. 2. 3 4. Protect base of walls from rain-splashed mud and from mortar splatter by coverings spread on ground and over wall surface. Protect sills. ledges. and projections from mortar droppings. Protect surfaces of window and door frames. as well as similar products with painted and integral ?nishes. from mortar droppings. Turn scaffold boards near the wall on edge at the end of each day to prevent rain from splashing mortar and dirt onto completed masonry. C. Without damaging completed work. provide protective boards at exposed external corners which are subject to damage by construction activities. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) USE 262.301; CDC P2009453 --HV-AC-- FOR -- - SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 07900-1 Joint Sealers SECTION 07900 JOINT SEALERS - GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Sealants and joint backing. B. Precompressed foam sealers. 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 0t?00 - Contract Ctoseout. B. Section 04810 - Unit Masonry Assemblies C. Section 09900 - Paints and Coatings 1.03 REFERENCES A. ASTM 834 Standard Speci?cation for Latex Sealants. B. ASTM 919 - Standard Practice for Use of Sealants in Acoustical Applications. 0. ASTM 920 a Standard Speci?cation for Elastomeric Joint Sealants. D. ASTM 1193 Standard Guide for Use of Joint Sealants. E. ASTM 1657 - Standard Speci?cation for Flexible Cellular Materials?Vinyl Chloride Polymers and Copolymers (Closed-Cell Foam). 1.04 DEFINITIONS A. "Joint Sealers". "caulk". "caulking", or "sealant" are synonymous, and mean "Joint Sealers" as herein described. B. Joint failure: Ajoint exhibiting one or more of the following characteristics: 1 . Air andtor water leakage. 2. Migration andfor reversion. 3. Loss of adhesion. 4. Loss of cohesion. 5. Failure to cure. 6. Discoloration. T. Staining of adjacent work. El. Development of bubbles. air pockets or voids. 1.05 SUBMITTALS A. See Section 01300 - Submittals, for submittal procedures. B. Product Data: Provide data indicating sealant chemical characteristics. C. Samples: Submit two samples, illustrating sealant colors for selection. Color charts are not acceptable. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) 252301} CDC P2009453 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 07'900?2 Joint Sealers D. Instructions: Indicate special procedures. E. Informational Submittals: 1. Adhesion compatibility test results: Submit a letter from sealant manufacturer indicating adhesion and compatibility testing has been performed and that materials are compatible and that adhesion is acceptable. Indicate requirements for primers or special preparation. Substrate staining test results: Submit a letter from sealant manufacturer indicating that substrate testing has been performed on actual samples of substrates indicated to receive joint sealers and that sealant was found to be non-staining to substrate. Indicate requirements for primers or special preparation to meet non-staining requirements. Special Warranty: Warrant for three years from Date of Substantial Completion. that sealants and accessories which fail to achieve airtight and watertight seal. exhibit loss of adhesion or cohesion. or do not cure. will be replaced. Warranty shall cover labor and materials. and shall not be pro-rated. QUALITY ASSURANCE Maintain one copy of each referenced document covering installation requirements on site. Prior to application of any sealant. and notwithstanding the specifying of various sealant types and locations of usage. investigate and verify compatibility of the sealant with joint surfaces. joint ?llers and other sealants. Provide only materials which are known to be fully compatible with actual installation conditions. Manufacturer Quali?cations: Company specializing in manufacturing the Products speci?ed in this section with minimum three years documented experience. Applicator Quali?cations: Company specializing in performing the work of this section with minimum three years experience. ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS A. Maintain temperature and humidity recommended by the sealant manufacturer during and after installation. COORDINATION A. Coordinate the work with all sections referencing this section. WARRANTY A. B. C. See Section 017'00 Contract Closeout. Correct defective work within a ?ve year period after Date of Substantial Completion. Warranty: include coverage for installed sealants and accessories which fail to achieve airtight seal, and watertight seal. exhibit loss of adhesion or cohesion. or do not cure. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 SEALANTS A. .134: Not Used. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) .mtz- 4: use 5 swam- coc P2009453 HMAQMQDIFICAIIONs F-ORI . . . I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section GTQOD-S Joint Sealers B. JS-Z: Silicone Architectural Sealant; one part, movement capability plus 100 percent minus 50 percent. ASTM C920, Type 8. Grade NS, Class 25. 1- Dow Corning "7?95 Silicone Building Sealant". 2. Dow Coming "1199". C. JS-3: Silicone Sanitary Sealant; one part, movement capability plus or minus 25 percent, fungus resistant; ASTM 0920, Type 8. Grade NS, Class 25. 1. GE Silicone "Sanitary 1700 Sealant?- 2. Dow Corning "7?86 Mildew Resistant Silicone". 3. Tremsil 200 Mildew Resistant. D. JS-4: Not Used. E. JS-5: Not Used. F. JS-E: High Temperature Resistant Sealant: One part acetoxy?cure, RTV silicone. ASTM 6920 Type S, Grade NS, Class 25, Use NT, and and Federal Speci?cation 001543A. TypeNon-sag, Class A, TT-S-0023UC. Type II, Class A. 1. Trade Mate, Hi?Temp. Silicone Sealant by Dow Corning 2.02 ACCESSORIES A. Primer: Non-staining type, recommended by sealant manufacturer to suit application. B. Joint Cleaner: Non-corrosive and non-staining type, recommended by sealant manufacturer; compatible with joint forming materials. C. Joint Backing: Round foam rod compatible with sealant; ASTM 1667, Type A: closed cell Polyurethane1 soft rod. Type B: Dpen cell rod (secondaryl backer rod); oversized 30 to 50 percent larger than joint width. D. Bond Breaker: Pressure sensitive tape recommended by sealant manufacturer to suit application. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 EXAMINATION A. B. 3.02 A. B. 3.03 Verify that substrate surfaces are ready to receive work. verify that joint backing and release tapes are compatible with sealant. PREPARATION Remove loose materials and foreign matter which might impair adhesion of sealant. Clean and prime joints in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. Perform preparation In accordance with manufacturer's instructions and ASTM 1193. Protect elements surrounding the work of this section from damage or disfigurement. INSTALLATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 I lb}[3}242 252301} 3.04 3.05 3.06 A. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 07909-4 Joint Sealers Perform work in accordance with sealant manufacturer?s requirements for preparation of surfaces and material installation instructions. Perform installation in accordance with ASTM 1193. Perform acoustical sealant application work in accordance with ASTM 919. Measure joint dimensions and size joint hackers to achieve width-to?depth ratio. neck dimension. and surface bond area as recommended by manufacturer. except where speci?c dimensions are indicated. Install bond breaker where joint backing is not used. Install sealant free of air pockets, foreign embedded matter. ridges. and sags. Apply sealant within recommended application temperature ranges. Consult manufacturer when sealant cannot be applied within these temperature ranges. Tool joints concaVe. Precompressed Foam Sealant: Do not stretch; avoid joints except at corners. ends, and intersections: install with face 113 to 1l4 inch below adjoining surface. CLEANING A. Clean adjacent soiled surfaces. PROTECTION OF FINISHED WORK A. Protect sealants until cured. SCHEDULE A. C. Lap Joints in Exterior Sheet Metal Work: Type JS-Z. Butt Joints in Exterior Metal Work and Siding: Type JS-Z. Interior Joints for Which No Other Sealant is Indicated: Type . In all openings of walls and ceilings ofmlaboratories and animal rooms to provide airtight seal, including all electrical conduits: Type JS-3. For pipe penetrations through non-rated gypsum walls: Type END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION (SBU) coo P2009898 zszama -- - full}. 42 US '3 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 081 15-1 Standard Steel Frames SECTION 08115 STANDARD STEEL FRAMES PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section includes non-rated steel frames. 1. Provide frames for interior glazed lights. Related Sections: Section 01300 - Submittais Section 01351 - Sustainable Project Requirements Section 04180 - Unit Masonry Assemblies Section 0?900 - Joint Sealers Section 08225 - FRP Doors. Section 08.710 Door Hardware Section 099 00 - Paints and Coatings 1.2 REFERENCES A. 1.3 SUBMITTALS A. B. American Nation a] Standards Institute: 1. ANSI A2503 - Recommended Specifications for Standard Steel Doors and Frames. ASTM International: 1. ASTM A591IA591 - Standard Speci?cation for Steel Sheet, Electrolytic Zinc- Coated. for Light Coating Mass Applications. 2. ASTM A553IA653M - Standard Speci?cation for Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated {Galvanized} or Zinc-Iron Alloy?Coated (Gaivannealed) by the Hot-Dip Process. Section 01330 Submitlal Procedures: Submittal procedures. Shop Drawings: Indicate frame elevations, reinforcement, anchor types and spacing, location of cut-o uts for hardware, and finish. Product Data: Submit frame con?guration and finishes. Samples: Submit two samples of frameI 6x6 inch in size illustrating factory ?nished frame colors and surface texture. Manufacturer's Installation Instructions: Submit special installation instructions. Manufacturers Certi?cate: Certify products meet or exceed specified requirements. 1.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Conform to requirements of ANSI A2506. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) 262301} I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009893 Section 08115-2 Standard Steel Frames 1.5 QUALIFICATIONS A. Manufacturer: Company specializing in manufacturing products speci?ed in this section with minimum three years documented experience. 1.6 DELIVERY. STORAGE. AND HANDLING A. Section 01600 - Product Requirements: Product storage and handling requirements. B. Accept frames on site in manufacturer?s packaging. Inspect for damage. C. Break seal on-site to permit ventilation. 1.7 COORDINATION A. Section 01300 - Administrative Requirements: Coordination and project conditions. B. Coordinate Work with frame opening construction, door, and hardware installation. C. Sequence installation to accommodate required door hardware electric wire connections. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 STANDARD STEEL FRAMES A. Basis of Design Manufacturer: 1. Coco Door Products, Model 5U. B. Product Description: Standard shop fabricated steel frames. ?re rated and non-rated types. 1. Interior Frames: a. Level 2, nominal 16 gage!0.053 inch thick material. base metal thickness. 2.2 ACCESSORIES A. Removable Stops: Rolled steel shape. mitered corners: prepared for countersink ster tamper proof screws. B. Bituminous Coating: Non-asbestos fibered asphalt emulsion. C. Primer: ANSI A250.10 rust inhibitive type. D. Siiencers: Speci?ed in Section 08710. 2.3 FABRICATION A. Fabricate frames as welded unit. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009898 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 08115-3 US I: 5: :5:th . . Standard SteeI Frames B. Transom Bars for Glazed Lights: Fixed type, of same pro?les as jamlo and head. (3. Fabricate frames with hardware reinforcement plates welded in place. Provide mortar guard boxes. D. Reinforce frames wider than 48 inches with roll formed steel channels fitted into frame headI flush with top. E. Prepare frames for silencers. Provide three single silencers for single doors on strike side. 2.4 SHOP FINISHING A. B. (3. Steel Sheet: Galvanized to ASTM A60. Primer: Air dried. Coat inside of frame profile with bituminous coating to minimum thickness of mo inch. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. Verify opening sizes and tolerances are acceptable. 3.2 INSTALLATION A. B. C. Install frames in accordance with ANSI A250.8. Coordinate with masonryr wall construction for anchor placement. Coordinate installation of frames with installation of hardware specified in Section 08710 and doors in Section 08225. 3.3 ERECTION TOLERANCES A. B. Section 01400 - {Qualityr Requirements: Tolerances. Maximum Diagonal Distortion: 1MB inch measured with straight edges, crossed cornerto CD ITIEF. END OF SECTION ssusmve BUT INFORMATION (sec) rmrs}:42 uses 2E2alh} I BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (sou: CDC P2009453 SECTION 08225 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED POLYESTER (FRP) DOORS PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. Fiberglass Reinforced Polyester Doors. El. Mandatory ?Shop-Installed? Hardware. C. Glazing. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01300? Submittals 3. Section 08115 Standard Steel Frames C. Section 08710 Door Hardware 1.3 REFERENCES A. BHMA - Builders' Hardware Manufacturers Association. 1.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Field Measurement: Door manufacturer's representative. door distributor?s representative. and general contractor shall take ?eld measurements prior to preparation of shop drawings to ensure proper ?tting of work. B. Door dimensions on the contract drawings are nominal dimensions: it is the General Contractor's responsibility to ?eld measure all openings and supply doors of proper size to ?t openings. Contractor shall be responsible for providing sizesrtolerances as required for door hardware. 1.5 SUBMITTALS A. Shop Drawings: Prepare shop drawings for fabrication and installation; submit to the Contracting Of?cer. Indicate dimensions, frame configuration. anchor spacings. door elevations. detail sections of typical composite members. hardware mounting heights. stile and rail reinforcement. expansion provisions and glazing. B. Product Data: Submit manufacturer?s speci?cations. standard details. and installation recommendations for components of ?berglass reinforced polyester doors required for the project. including test reports certifying that products have been tested and comply with performance requirements. C. Samples: Submit 6" 6" sample of door section showing material. thickness. color. texture, and assembly of rails and stiles. urethane core. and ?ber reinforced polyester faces. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (sew Section 08225-1 FRP Doors UE. I: 2623M: SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 08225-2 FRP Doors coc P2009453 .. I D. Templates and Diagrams: Furnish hardware templates. diagrams and other data as needed to fabricators and installers of related work, and to Contracting Of?cer, for project coordination. E. FRP door submittals shall be reviewed concurrently with door hardware submitlals. Contracting Of?cer will not review submittals for FRP doors without receipt of submitlais for door hardware. 1.6 QUALIFICATIONS A. Fabricator: Company specializing in performing the work of this Section with minimum 5 years documented experience. DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING A. All materials supplied shall be delivered to thejobsite in their original, unopened packages with labels intact- Materials shall be inspected, and the manufacturer informed of any damage or discrepancies. Unsatisfactory materials shall be rejected. B. All materials supplied shall be packaged in individual corrugated cartons. Doors shall "?oat" within cartons, with no portion of door or hardware in contact with outer shell. 1.3 COORDINATION A. Coordinate the Work with door hardware sizes. types and installation. 1.9 SPECIAL PROJECT WARRANTY A. Provide written warranty signed by the manufacturer. and by the vendor, agreeing to replace fiberglass reinforced doors which fail in material or workmanship within 10 years from the date of acceptance. Failure of material or workmanship includes warping, faulty operation, deterioration of finish or construction in excess of normal weathering, and defects in hardware, weatherstripping, and other components of the work. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 FLUSH-TYPE FIBERGLASS REINFORCED POLYESTER DOORS A. The basis of design for the flush-type fiberglass reinforced polyester doors are based on the following manufacturer and model number: 1. Special-Lite, T, with Class A Option for Flame Spread. 2.2 MATERIALS A. Aluminum Members: Alloy temperfor' strength, corrosion resistance and application of required finish; ASTM 8221 for extrusions, ASTM 8209 for sheetfplate, minimum wall thickness of 0.125". 3. Finish: Clear 215 R1 Class 1 anodized, .7 mils or greater thickness. 0. Fasteners: Aluminum, or other materials warranted by manufacturer to be non-corrosive and compatible with aluminum components, unless indicated otherwise. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 Section 08795-3 . D. Stiles and rails shall be joined with mltered comerjoints and angle blocks secured by full width 31?8" stainless steel tie rods. top and bottom bolted through an extruded spline and riveted reinforcing angles and secured with aircraft type nuts. E. Use concealed fasteners wherever possible. F. Brackets and Reinforcement: Manufacturer's high-strength aluminum units where feasible; otherwise, provide non?magnetic stainless steel or hot-dip galvanized steel complying with ASTM A386. 1. Provide manufacturer?s standard reinforcement for each type of hardware required, not less than 0.125" thick. 2. Provide man ufacturer?s recommended fasteners reinforcement. G. Core Material: High density urethane foam minimum 5 pounds per cubic foot of density. Core shall not contain any chloro?uorocarbons nor shall be used in the core foaming process. H. Face Material: Fiberglass reinforced polyester. .120? minimum thickness. with pebble-like embossed ?nish. The embossed ?nish shall be visible on the door. Color shall be selected by the Government from manufacturer?s available colors. and shall be permanently bonded through the full thickness of the ?berglass door faces. 1. Face sheets to be locked in by extruded interlocking edges which are to be an integral part of rails and stiles. Snap-on or applied door edge is not acceptable. 2. Acceptable Product: Subject to compliance with the requirements. provide Glasbord-P. Dyrotech Industries. 3. Impact Strength of Face Sheets: ASTM 0256. Izod Impact Strength. 20 foot pounds per inch of notch. 4. Abrasion Resistance of Face Sheets: Model 5130 Taber Abraser with 68-17 abrasive wheel type. and a load weight of 500 gram load per abrading arm (1.000 grams total}. 25 cycles. and 100% vacuum. Percent weight loss not to exceed .029. . 5. Hardness of Face Sheets: ASTM D2583. Barcol Meter Hardness Test. nominal value: 54. i 6. Weatherability - Humidity Resistance of Face Sheets: ASTM E1570. water absorption not greater than 0.20% after 24-hr immersion at 7. FlameISmoke Rating: Face sheet tested in accordance with ASTM E84-79a shall have the following ratings: 3. Smoke Developed: Less than 450. I b. Flame Spread: Less than 25. I B. Flexural Strength: Face sheet tested in accordance with ASTM D790 shall have a nominal panel value of 24.000 psi. 9, Color: White I. Rails and Stiles: Provide extruded 6063 T5 aluminum alloy. All exposed surfaces to be minimum thickness. 1. Stiles shall be tubular to accept hardware. 2. Top and bottom rails to be extruded with legs for interlocking rigidity weather bar. J. Glazing: Provide clear tempered glass. 2.3 DOOR COMPONENTS A. Vision Lites: Fabricate aluminum vision lites to facilitate replacement of tempered glass. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (saw [bits :12 C: SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section 03225?4 HVAQ -- - - FRP Doors without disassembly of door stiles and rails. Interior glass stops to be screw applied. B. Frame Finish: Clear aluminum (U328). 2.4 HARDWARE A. Coordinate hardware items with Speci?cation Section 08710. 2.5 FABRICATION A. Use the templates provided by hardware item manufacturer. B. All hardware items, With the exception of door closers, deadlocks, astragals, door stops, and automatic door bottoms, shall be shipped to door manufacturer. Door manufacturer shall install hardware on doors in accordance with hardware manufacturer's instructions. C. Door manufacturer shall provide proper preparation all hardware, both factory installed and ?eld installed. D. Complete fabrication, assembly, finishing and other work before shipping doors to project site. Disassemble components only as necessary for shipment and installation. E. Perform fabrication operations, including cutting. fitting, forming, drilling, and grinding of material in a manner which prevents damage to exposed finish surfaces. Sequence: Complete cutting. ?tting, forming, drilling, and grinding prior to cleaning, ?nishing, and surface treatment. Remove arises from out edges and ease edges and corners to radius of 2. Reinforcing: Install reinforcing as necessary for proper installation of door hardware. and for high-traffic performance. Separate dissimilar metals with bituminous paint or other separator which will prevent corrosion. 3. Continuity: Maintain accurate relation of planes and angles, with hairline of contacting members. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 INSTALLATION I A. Install frames in accordance with manufacturer?s speci?cations and instructions. B. Install assemblies plumb. level, and true-to~line. without any warp or twist of doors or frames. C. Separate aluminum and other corrodible metal surfaces from sources of corrosion or electrolytic action at points of contactwith other materials. 3.2 ADJUSTING A. Adjust hardware for smooth and balanced door movement. Door operation and movement to be consistent from one door to another. 3.3 CLEANING A. Remove temporary protection and clean assemblies thoroughly prior to acceptance. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION usc 262301} I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section 08225-5 FRP Doors 3.4 PROTECTION OF FINISHED WORK A. Do not permit traf?c near ?nished work without protection to ?nishes. 3.5 SCHEDULE A. Provide in accordance with door schedule on Contract Drawings. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION tut-[3' 112 '3 Ci coo P2009453 .HVAC.MODIFICATION-S-FDRI- -- SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION Section 08710-1 I Door Hardware SECTION 08710 DOOR HARDWARE - GENERAL 1.01 1.02 1.03 SUMMARY A. This Section includes items known commercially as ?nish or door hardware that are required for swing doors. 1 Hinges, pivots, and continuous hinges. 2 Lock-cylinders and keys. 3 Lock and latch sets. 4. Bolts. 5. Exit devices. 6 Pushipull units. 7 Closers. 8 Overhead holders. 9. Miscellaneous door control devices. 10. Door trim units. 11. Protection plates. 12. Sound light seals for interior doors. 13. Automatic drop seals (door bottoms}. RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Related Sections: 1. Section 01' 300 Submittais 2. Section 08115 Standard Steer Frames 3. Section 08225 Fiberglass Reinforced Poiyester (FRP) Doors REFERENCES A. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA): 1. No. 80 Fire Doors and Windows 2 No. 101 Life Safety Code B. American National Standard Institute (ANSI): A 117.1 Speci?cations for Making Buildings and Facilities Accessible to and Usable by Physically Handicapped People. 2. A 156.18 Materials and Finishes. C. Builder Hardware Manufacturers Association-(BHMA) 1. Materials and finishes: BHMA1307 D. Steel Door Institute (SDI) 1. SDI. Tech Data Series 100 E. Door and Hardware Institute (DHI) 1. Hardware for labeled fire doors. F. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101 -336. G. Georgia Accessibility Code, O.C.GA. Chapter 120-3-20. H. Uniform FederaIAccessibility Standards (UFAS) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEIU) BUILDING INFORMATION coc 92009453 Section 03710-2 I Door Hardware 1.04 SUBMITTALS A. Product Data: Submit manufacturer's technical information for each item of hardware. Include whatever information may be necessary to show compliance with requirements. and include instructions for installation and for maintenance of operating parts and ?nish. Submit final hardware schedule in vertical format. B. Hardware Schedule: Submit ?nal hardware schedule in manner indicated below. Hardware schedules are intended for coordination of work. 1. Final Hardware Schedule Content: Based on builders hardware indicated. organize hardware schedule into ?hardware sets" indicating complete designations of every item required for each door or opening. Include the following information: Type, style, function, size, and ?nish of each hardware item. Name and manufacturer of each item. Fastenings and other pertinent information. Location of each hardware set cross referenced to indications on Drawings both on ?oor plans and in door and frame schedule. a. Explanation of all abbreviations, symbols, and codes contained in schedule. f. Mounting locations for hardware. g. Door and frame sizes and materials. 2. Submittal Sequence: Submit schedule at earliest possible date particularly where acceptance of hardware schedule must precede fabrication of other work that is critical in the Protect construction schedule pressed metal frames). include with schedule the product data. samples. shop drawings of other work affected by door hardware. and other information essential to the coordinated review of schedule. 3. Keying Schedule: Submit separate detailed schedule indicating clearly how the Government's ?nal instructions on keying of locks have been ful?lled. Keying shall conform to the existing Sargent and KESO systems at CDC. shoe (3. Samples: Prior to submittal of the ?nal hardware schedule and prior to ?nal ordering of hardware, if requested. submit one sample of each type of exposed hardware unit, ?nish as required. and tagged with full description for coordination with schedule. 1. Samples will be returned to the supplier. Units that are acceptable and remain undamaged through submittal, review, and ?eld comparison process may, after ?nal check of operation, be incorporated in the Work, within limitations of keying coordination requirements. 1.05 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Single Source Responsibility: Obtain each type of hardware (latch and lock sets. hinges, closers. etc.) from only one manufacturer offering products complying with these Speci?cations. B. Supplier Quali?cations: A recognized builders hardware supplier who has been furnishing hardware within 100 miles of the Project's vicinity for a period of two years, and who is or employees a registered architectural hardware consultant (AHC) who is available. at reasonable times during the course of the work, for consultation about project?s hardware requirements to Government, Contracting Of?cer and Contractor. C. Fire-Rated Openings: Provide door hardware for fire-rated openings that complies with NFPA Standard No. 80 and requirements of authorities having jurisdiction. Provide only items of door hardware that are listed and are identical to products tested by UL, Wamock Hersey, FM, or other testing and inspecting organization acceptable to authorities having jurisdiction for use on types and sizes of doors indicated in compliance with requirements of ?re-rated door and door frame labels. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUI BUILDING INFORMATION Ibli? US I: CDC P2009453 HVAC. ODIF. ICATI ONS D. 1.08 A. 1.07 A. 1.08 A. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEU) BUILDING INFORMATION Section 08710-3 Door Hardware All hardware shall comply with all State and Federal Handicap codes and laws. Provide tactile warning on the back of all lever handles that enter mechanical, electrical and hazardous areas. PRODUCT HANDLING Tag each item or package separately with identi?cation related to ?nal hardware schedule, and include basic installation instructions with each item or package. Packaging of door hardware is responsibility of supplier. As material is received by hardware supplier from various manufacturers, sort and repackage in containers clearly marked with appropriate hardware set nomber to match set numbers of approved hardware schedule. Two or more identical sets may be packed in same container. Inventory door hardware jointly with representatives of hardware supplier and hardware installer until each is satis?ed that count is correct. Deliver individually packaged door hardware items to place of installation (shop or Project site). Provide secure lock-up for door hardware delivered to the Project. but not yet installed. Control handling and installation of hardware items that are not immediately replaceable so that completion of the Work will not be delayed by hardware losses both before and after installation. JOB CONDITIONS Coordination: Coordinate hardware with other work. Tag each item or package separately, with identification related to the ?nal hardware schedule, and include basic installation instruction in the package. Furnish hardware items of proper design for use on doors and frames of the thickness, pro?le, swing, security and similar requirements indicated, as necessary for proper installation and function. Deliver individually packaged hardware items at the proper times to the proper locations {shop or project area) for installation. Templates: Furnish hardware templates to each fabricator of doors, frames and other work to be factory-prepared for the installation of hardware. Upon request, check the shop drawings of such other work, to con?rm that adequate provisions are made for the proper installation of hardware (especially as it relates to ?re rating of door assemblies). MAINTENANCE Maintenance Tools and Instructions: Furnish a complete set of specialized tools and maintenance instructions for Government's continued adjustment, maintenance. and removal and replacement of door hardware. PARTZ - PRODUCTS 2.01 A. SCHEDULED HARDWARE General Requirements: Requirements for design, grade, function, size and other distinctive qualities of each type of builder's hardware are indicated in the Hardware Schedule at the end of this speci?cation section. One or more manufacturers are listed for each hardware type required. The manufacturer listed below as "Basis of Design Manufacturer? indicates whose product designation is used in the Hardware Schedule for purpose of establishing minimum requirements. Provide either the product designatedI or, where more than one manufactUrer SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEED) INFORWTION coc P2009453 I (mom uses 252301} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ BUILDING INFORMATION Section 08710-4 Door Hardware is listed. the comparable product of one of the other manufacturers which with the detailed requirements for each item including those speci?ed elsewhere in this section. B. Basis of Design Manufacturers: 1. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 15. '19. Hinges (except continuous hinges): a. Referenced Manufacturer - Hager b. Approved Manufacturers - Stanley. McKinney. Lawrence Locks. Latch Sets and Deadlocks: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Sargent b. Approved Manufacturers no substitutions allowed Lock Cylinders: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Sargent Approved Manufacturers - no substitutions allowed Exit Devices: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Von Duprin b. Approved Manufacturers no substitutions allowed Door Control Devices and Closers, Operators. Sentronic Closers. Wall Magnets: a. Referenced Manufacturer - LCN Manufacturing b. Approved Manufacturers - no substitution allowed Push. Pull 8: Protective Plates. Wall 8: Floor Stops: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Rockwood b. Approved Manufacturers - Baldwin. Ives. Johnson Security Hardware: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Locknetics Security Engineering b. Approved Manufacturers - Von Duprin Silencers: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Rockwood b. Approved Manufacturers Johnson. Ives Door Seals (sound. light) and Astragals: a. Referenced Manufacturer - National Guard Products b. Approved Manufacturers - Zero International. Pernko Electric Door Strikes: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Von Duprin. o. Approved Manufacturers - Folger Adam Co. Continuous Hinges: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Special Lite Approved Manufacturers - Hager (Roton). Stanley. Select Products. Door Coordinators: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Johnson In. Approved Manufacturers - Rockwood. Ives Flush Bolts: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Ives b. Approved Manufacturers - Door Controls. Hagar. Rockwood Lock Protectors: 3. Referenced Manufacturer - Johnson b. Approved Manufacturers - Hagar. Ives Pivots: a. Referenced Manufacturer - Rixson b. Approved Manufacturers - LCN. Ives Exit Alarms a. Referenced Manufacturer - Detex b. Approved Manufacturers Von Duprin. Locknetics. Door Control Monitor Switches a. Referenced Manufacturer - Sentrol b. Approved Manufacturers - no substitution allowed SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION - BUILDING INFORMATION LIE CI 252mb CDC P2009453 HVACMGDIFIOATIONS I 2.02 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) - BUILDING INFORMATION Section 08710-5 Door Hardware C. Hardware Finishes 1. General: Provide matching ?nishes for hardware units at each door or opening. to the greatest extent possible. and except as otherwise indicated. RedUce differences in color and textures as much as commercially possible where the base metal or metal forming process is different for individual units of hardware exposed at the same door or opening. In general. match items to the manufacturer?s standard ?nish or the tatch and lock set (or pus h?pull units if no latch-lock sets) for color and texture- 2. Finish: Provide quality of?nish. including thickness of plating or coating (if any). composition. hardness and other qualities complying with manufacturer's standards, but in no case less than speci?ed for the applicable units of hardware by referenced standards. 3. Protective Coating: Provide protective lacquer coating on all exposed hardware ?nishes of bronze. 4. Finishes Designations: The designations used below to indiCate hardware ?nishes are those listed in "Materials 8: Finishes Standard 1301" by EIHMA. including coordination with the traditional IJ.S. ?nishes shown by certain manufacturers for their products. a. Hinges (Interior) 652 Satin Chromium Plated b. Pivots 626 Satin Chromium Plated c. Flush Bolts 526 Satin Chromium Plated d. Locks. Latches 630 Satin Stainless Steel. Except Sargent 0 series shall be 26D. brushed chrome ?nish e. Exit Devices 626 Satin Chrome f. Door Closers-Surface 689 Aluminum Painted 9. Door Closers-Concealed 626 Satin Chromium Plated h. Push Plates 6130 Satin Stainless Steel i. Pull Plates 630 Satin Stainless Steel Protective Plates 630 Satin Stainless Steel k. Lock Protectors 630 Satin Stainless Steel Door Stops 626 Satin Chromium Plated rn. Overhead Stops 626 Satin Stainless Steel n. Thresholds 8: Weather-stripping Aluminum 0. Continuous Hinges (aluminum) 628 Aluminum p. Continuous Hinges (stainless) 630 Satin Stainless Steel MATERIALS AND FABRICATION A. Manufacturer?s Name Plate: Do not use manufacturers' products that have manufacturer's name or trade name displayed in a visible location (omit removable nameplates} except in conjunction with required ?re-rated labels and as otherwise acceptable to Contracting Of?cer. 1. Manufacturer's identilication will be permitted on rim of lock cylinders only. Hand of door: The drawings show the direction of slide, swing or hand of each door leaf. Furnish each item of hardware for proper installation and operation of the door movement as shown. Base Metals: Produce hardware units of basic metal and forming method indicated. using manufacturers standard metal alloy. composition. temper. and hardness. but in no case of lesser (commercially recognized) quality than speci?ed for applicable hardware units by applicable ANSIJBHMA A156 series standards for each type of hardware item and with ANSIIBHMA A156.13 for ?nish designations indicated. Do not furnish "optional" materials or forming methods for those indicated. except as otherwise speci?ed. . Fasteners: Manufacturers hardware to conform to published templates. generally prepared for machine screw installation. Do not provide hardware which has been prepared for self- tapping sheet metal screws. except as specifically indicated. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION CDC P2009453 I (bir3iz42 use. 262ath} 2.03 2.04 E. BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION Section 037'10-6 Door Hardware 1. Screws: Furnish screws for installation. with each hardware item. Provide Phillips ?at- head screws except as otherwise indicated. Finish exposed (exposed under any condition) screws to match the hardware ?nish or. if exposed on surfaces of other work match that surface as closely as possible. including "prepared for paint" in surfaces to receive painted ?nish. 2. Concealed Fasteners: Provide concealed fasteners for hardware units which are exposed when the door is closed. except to the extent no standard units of the type speci?ed are available with concealed fasteners. Do not use through bolts for installation where the bolt head or the nut on the opposite face is exposed in other work. except where it is not feasible to adequately reinforce the work. Tools for Maintenance: Furnish a complete set of specialized tools as needed for Government's continued adjustment. maintenance. and removal and replacement of builder's hardware. HINGES AND PIVDTS A. Templates: Except for hinges and pivots to be installed entirely (both leaves) into wood doors and frames. provide only template?produced units. Screws: Furnish Phillips ?at-head screws. Use all-purpose or machine screws for installation of units in hollow metal. Use wood screw for installation of units in wood. Finish screw heads to match surface of hinges or pivots. Hinge Pins: Except as otherwise indicated. provide hinge pins as follows: 1. Type: a. Steel Hinges: Steel pins in. Non-ferrous Hinges: Stainless steel pins 2. Interior Doors: Non?rising pins. 3. Tips: Flat button and matching plug. ?nished to match leaves. except where hospital tip indicated. 4. Lockable Door With Hinge On Key Side: Non-removable pins. Number of Hinges: Provide not less than 3 hinges for each door leaf for doors 90" or less in height and one additional hinge for each 30" of additional height. Sizes of Hinges: Provide 5" 4 12' for all doors over 30" {unless noted othenrvise in schedule). LOCK CYLINDERS AND KEYING A. Review the keying system with the Government and provide the type required (master. grandmaster or great-grandmaster). All cylinders to be a restricted keyway. Equip locks with construction keying or construction cores for use during construction. Furnish only temporary inserts for the interchangeable core cylinders. remove these when directed. 1. Furnish ?nal cores and keys direct from the factory to the CDC locksmith as directed. Metals: Construct lock cylinder parts from brass or bronze. stainless steel. or nickel silver. Comply with Government's instructions for master-keying and. except as othenivise indicated. provide individual change key for each lock that is not designated to be keyed alike with a group of related locks. 1. Permanently inscribe each key with number of lock that identi?es cylinder manufacturer's key symbol. and notation. NOT SENSITIVE BUT - BUILDING INFORMATION 252th; 2.05 2.06 2.0? 2.08 CDC P2009453 I E. F. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION . Section 03710-7? I Door Hardware Key Material: Provide keys of nickel silver only. Key Quantity: Furnish 2 change keys for each keyset, 2 master keys for each master system, and 2 grandmaster keys for each grandmaster system. 1. Furnish 2000 extra blanks stamped NOT 2. Deliver keys to CDC locksmith as directed. 3. Provide 20 construction master keys. 4. Provide one copy of the factory cylinder bitting list shipped direct to the CDC locksmith. LOCKS, LATCHES, AND BOLTS A. Strikes: Provide manufacturer's standard wrought box strike for each latch or lock bolt, with curved lip extended to protect frame, ?nished to match hardware set. 1. Provide ?at lip strikes for looks with 3-piece, anti-friction latchbolts as recommended by manufacturer. 2. Provide recess type top strikes for bolts looking into head frames, unless othenrvise indicated. 3. Provide dust-proof strikes for foot bolts, except where special threshold construction provides non-recessed strike for bolt. Lock Throw: Provide 314" minimum throw of latch and 1" minimum throw of deadbolt used on pairs of doors. Comply with UL requirements for throw of bolts and latch bolts on rated ?re openings. Provide ?2-inch minimum throw on other latch and deadlock bolts. Flush Bolt Heads: Minimum of ?lf2" diameter rods of brass, bronze, or stainless steel with minimum 12" long rod. Rabbeted Doors: Where rabbeted door stiles are indicated. provide special rabbeted front on lock and latch units and bolts. Exterior doors and interior doors with card readers: Lever handles for locksets, basis of speci?cation is Sargent 8200 Mortise lever looks with rose and lever. Sargent KESO interchangeable core type cylinder. Handle to be solid stainless steel with 4 long grip. Interior doors without card readers: Cylindrical locksets, basis of speci?cation is Sargent 10- line cylindrical lever locks with rose and lever. Sargent Restricted keyway. SILENCERS A. Provide 13 silencers for each single door. Provide 2 silencers for each pair of doors. Basis of speci?cation is Ives SR 64. UNITS A. - installation, thruebolted for matched pairs but not for single units. Concealed Fasteners: Provide manufacturers special concealed fastener system for CLOSERS AND DOOR CONTROL DEVICES A. Size of Units: Except as otherwise speci?cally indicated, comply with the man ufacturer?s recommendations for size of door control unit depending on size of door, exposure to weather, and anticipated frequency of use. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section 087'10?8 I B. Access-Free Manual Closers: Where manual closers are indicated for doors. provide adjustable units complying with the Georgia Accessibility Code (OCGA Chapter 1120-3-20) provisions for door opening force and delayed action closing. (3. Closers to have full rack and pinion hydraulic operation with separate controls for closing and latching speeds. Closer to have high strength cast iron cylinder and all temperature fluid. D. All manual door closers shall be certi?ed to exceed ten million {10.000.000} full load operating cycles by a recognized independent testing laboratory. Closers to be fully hydraulic. rack and pinion action with high strength cast iron cylinders and one piece forged steel pistons. Closer arms shall be forged steel (stamped steel arms are not acceptable). Hydraulic fluid to be of a type requiring no seasonal adjustments for temperatures from 120 degrees (49 degrees C) to ~30 degrees (-35 degrees C). Pinion shaft to be a minimum diameter of Hydraulic regulation to be controlled by tamper-proof. non-critical screw valves. adjustable with a he): wrench. Separate adjustments for back check. general Speed. and latch speed. Where detailed on double lever arm closers. provide a delayed action feature to delay closing up to one minute from maximum opening to approximately ?5 degrees. Back check shall be properly located for protection of the door. frame and applied hardware. All closers shall be mounted with hex nuts and bolts. E. Power Operators: 1. Where low kinetic energy. as defined by ANSI Standard AI 56.19. power operators are indicated for doors required to be accessible to the disabled. provide electrically powered 9540 Series operators complying with the 1990 ADA for opening force and time to close standards. 2. Full closing force shall be provided when the power or assist cycle ends. 3. All power operator systems shall include the following features and functions. a. Provisions for separate conduits to carry high and low voltage wiring in compliance with the National Electrical Code. section ?25-31. b. When an obstruction or resistance to the opening swing is encountered. the operator will continue attempting to open the door. If the obstruction or resistance remains. the operator will again pause the door. c. The operator will be designed to prevent damage to the mechanism if the system is actuated while the door is latched or if the door is forced closed during the opening cycle. d. All covers. mounting plates and arm systems shall be powder coated and successfully pass a minimum of 100 hours testing as outlined in ANSI Standard A5613. a. UL listed for use on labeled doors. All Operators shall be non~handed with spring power over a range of at least four sizes; either 1 through 4 or 2 through 5. g. Provisions in the control box or module shall provide control {inputs and outputs) for: electric strike delay. auxiliary contacts. sequential operation. ?re alarms systems. actuators. swing side sensors. stop side sensors. 4. Ali electrically powered operators shall include the following features or functions: a. When an obstruction or resistance to the opening swing is encountered. the operator will pause at that point. then attempt to continue opening the door. If the obstruction or resistance remains. the operator will again pause the door. b. Easin accessible main power and maintain hold-open switches will be provided on the operator. c. An electronically controlled clutch to provide adjustable opening force. d. A microprocessor to control all motor and clutch functions. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION - BUILDING INFORMATION 4: US I: coo P2009453 MODIFICATIONS soe . 2.09 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEU) BUILDING INFORMATION Section 08710-9 Door Hardware a. An on-board power supply capable of delivering both 12V and 24v outputs up to a maximum of 1.0 ampere combined load. f. All input and output power wiring shall be protected by slow blow fuses. These fuses shall be easily replaceable without special tools or component replacement. 5. Actuators shall be weather resistant and provide normally open momentary contacts. The actuator is designed to mount in a standard single gang box wide, 4? high, and 2" deep} EXIT DEVICES A. Provide low profile push pad mortise lock type devices with opposing lever handles. Basis for lever handle is Von Duprin optional lever #03 in satin chrome. Exit Devices shall be listed for life safety. All exit devices for ?re rated openings shall have labels for ?Fire Exit Hardware?. Ali exit devices mounted on labeled wood doors shall be thru-bolted mounted on the door per the door manufacturers requirements. All trim shail be thru-bolted to the lock stile case. All exit devices shall incorporate a fluid damper, which decelerates the touchpad on its return stroke and eliminates noise associated with exit device operation. All exit devices shall be non-handed. Touchpad shall extend minimum of 12 of the doorwidth and shall be a minimum height of 2 3H Plastic touchpads are not acceptable. All latchbolts shall be deadlocking type. Latchbolts shall have a self-lubricating coating to reduce wear. Plated or plastic coated latchbolis are not acceptable. Exit Device Dogging: Except on ?re-rated doors, where closers are provided on doors equipped with exit devices, equip the units with keyed dogging device to keep the latch bolt retracted, when engaged. 2.010 DOOR TRIM UNITS 2.011 A. Fasteners: Provide manufacturer?s standard exposed fasteners for door trim units (kick plates, edge trim, viewers, knockers, mail drops and similar units) of either machine screws or self?tapping screws. Edge trim: Fabricate edge trim of stainless, not more than or less than me" smallerin length than door dimension. Protection Plates: Fabricate protection plates (armor. kick or mop) not more than 2" less than door width on singles and 1" less than door width on pairs by the height indicated. Install kick and armor plates to Hollow metal doors with Stainless Steel "pop" rivets. See door elevations. 1. Metal Plates: Stainless steel. U.S. 1Ei gaUQe (.050 inch). WEATHERSTRIPPING AND SEALS A. B. General: Provide smoke, light, or sound seals on interior doors where indicated or scheduled. Provide noncorrosive fasteners for exterior applications and elsewhere as indicated. Replaceable Seal Strips: Provide only those units where resilient or ?exible seal strip is easily replaceable and readily available from stocks maintained by manufacturer. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION coc P2009453 [b}(3}242 262301} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) BUILDING INFORMATION Section 081?10-1 0 I Door Hardware 2.012 CONTINUOUS HINGES: A. Aluminum Continuous hinges to be manufactured of extruded aluminum alloy with anodized ?nish (painted gear cap only). 1. All hinges shall be manufactured to template. Uncut hinges shall be non-handed and shall be a pinless assembly of three interlocking extrusions applied to the full length of the door and frame without mortising. 2. Vertical door load shall be carried on chemically lubricated polyacaetal thrust bearings. The door and frame leaves shall be continuously geared together for the entire length and secured with a full cover channel. Hinge to operate to a full 180". 3. Hinges to be milled. anodized and assembled in matching pairs. Fasteners supplied shall be 410 stainless steel. plated and hardened. 4. Where speci?ed for use as UL rated doors, hinges shall bear UL label. UL rating shall be achieved without the use of mechanical pins or studs to pin the hinge leaves together in a ?re condition. B. Stainless steel continuous hinges shall be as scheduled. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 INSTALLATION A. Mount hardware units at heights indicated in following applicable publications. except as speci?cally indicated or required to comply with governing regulations and except as otherwise directed by the Contracting Of?cer. Mount locks at heights indicated in hardware sets. 1. "Recommended Locations for Builders Hardware for Standard Steel Doors and Frames" by the Door and Hardware Institute. 2. "Recommended Locations for Builders Hardware for Custom Steel Doors and Frames" by the Door and Hardware Institute. Install each hardware item in compliance with the manufacturer's instructions and recommendations. Where cutting and ?tting is required to install hardware onto or into surfaces that are later to be painted or ?nished in another way. coordinate removal. storage. and reinstallation or application of surface protection with ?nishing work speci?ed in the Division 9 Sections. Do not install surface-mounted items until finishes have been completed on the substrates invoived. Do not Thru?bolt door closers or exit devices unless required by the door manufacturer. Coordinate with the wood door speci?cations. Set units level. plumb. and true to line and location. Adjust and reinforce the attachment substrate as necessary for proper installation and operation. Drill and countersink units that are not tacton prepared for anchorage fasteners. Space fasteners and anchors in accordance with industry standards. Install Armor. Kick and Mop plates to hollow metal doors with Stainless steel "pop" rivets. Weatherstripping and Seals: Comply with manufacturer's instructions and recommendations to the extent installation requirements are not indicated. There shall be a meeting before any materials are released for shipment to coordinate all electrical hardware items with the hollow metal supplier. installer. electrical and security contractors. The ?nish hardware supplier shall provide point to point riser diagrams showing all electrical hardware items. The hardware submittat shall indicate the function of each opening with electric hardware. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION - BUILDING INFORMATION coc P2009453 HVAC MODIEICATIQNS FOR I ADJUSTING, CLEANINGI AND DEMONSTRATING mite. 4: us -: 3.02 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) - BUILDING INFORMATION Section 087'1 0-11 Door Hardware A. Adjust and check each operating item of hardware and each door to ensure proper operation or function of every unit. Replace units that cannot be adjusted to operate freer and smootth or as intended forthe application made. 1. Where door hardware is installed more than one month prior to acceptance or occupancy of a space or area. return to the installation during the week prior to acceptance or occupancy and make ?nal check and adjustment of all hardware items in such space or area. Clean operating items as necessary to restore preper function and ?nish of hardware and doors. Adjust door control devices to compensate for ?nal operation of heating, ventilating and air conditioning equipment (HVAC). B. Clean adjacent surfaces soiled by hardware installation. Remove all temporary labels, constrUction marks soil from door hardware. C. Instruct Government's personnel in the proper adjustment and maintenance of door hardware and hardware finishes. D. Six-Month Adjustment: Approximately six months after the date of Substantial Completion, the Installer, accompanied by representatives of the manufacturers of latchsets and Iocksets and of door control devices. and of other major hardware suppliers, shall return to the Project to perform the following work: 2. 3. 4. Examine and re-adjust each item of door hardware as necessary to restore function of doors and hardware to with speci?ed requirements. Consult with and instruct Government's personnel In recommended additions to the maintenance procedures. Replace hardware items that have deteriorated or failed due to faulty design, materials, or installation of hardware units. Prepare a written report of current and predictable problems (of substantial nature) in the performance of the hardware. PART 4 - SCHEDULES 4.01 HARDWARE SCHEDULE Hardware Set 1 Door 883 8003.1 1 Continuous hinge SPECIAL LITE - SL11HD SECURITY CAP 1 Deadlock SARGENT - 4875 1 Pull ROCKWOOD - 90 1 Push Plate ROCKWOOD - 70C: 1 Flush Pull SPECIAL LITE - SL84 1 Power Operator LCN - 95.40 1 Header Safety Sensor LCN - 8310-877 2 Actuator LCN - 8310-313 1 Armor plate 35" high, 2" less than door width. Mount above door bottom seal on push side of door, 1 Mop plate 39" high, 1" less than doorwidth. 1 Door bottom seal NATIONAL GUARD PRODUCTS - 220NA END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ BUILDING INFORMATION uses 2622501} SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Sectirm 09721-1 MMA Flooring coc P2009453 I SECTION 09721 METHYL METHACRYLATE (MMA) ACRYLIC FLOORING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. Scari?cation of existing ?oor coatings and patching of designated floor areas. as required. B. Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) Acrylic flooring and integrai cove. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01300 - Submiltais Section 01546 Health and Safety Section 01700 Contract Cioseout Section 04310 Unit Masonry Assemblies Section 0?900 - Joint Sealers F. Section 09900- Paints and Coatings 1.3 A. Submit under provisions of Section 01300. B. Product Data: Provide complete information and description of methods. procedures and tools to be used when scantying the topping on the existing floor. Provide data for the MMA ?ooring system, describing physical and performance characteristics; sizes. patterns. textures and colors available. Include certi?cation indicating compliance of materials with requirements. C. Manufacturer's Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for each respective product proposed for use. D. Maintenance and Cleaning lnfonnation: Provide four copies of maintenance schedule. cleaning materials and procedures for ?ooring maintenance and cleaning. E. Samples: Submit two samples. 12" 12" in size applied to hardboard or similar backing for rigidity. illustrating color. texture and pattern for each color speci?ed. F. Manufacturer?s Installation Instructions: Indicate Special procedures, base conditions. location and type of control joints. and other components requiring special attention. G. Installation Certi?cation. Scari?cation of the existing topping and installation of the MMA flooring shall be performed by the manufacturer or manufacturer's agent. hereafter called the Installer. 1. Written codi?cation from a representative of the manufacturer or Installer shall be provided to SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section 09721?2 HVAQMQDIFICATIQNS - I MMA Flooring the Contracting Of?cer stating that staff of the manufacturer or Installer has installed similar MMA ?ooring systems for at least ?ve years. 2. The following manufacturer's letters of acceptance shall be required. H. Man ufaotu rer's Letters of Acceptance: Provide three letters of acceptance during the work of this section. They shall be written and received within 24 hours of completion of each of the following events: 1. Upon review of the following items: all surfaces to be scarified, the removal techniques proposed by the Installer. all coved conditions, relative vertical height of surfaces to receive flooring, all other conditions important to the proper preparation and installation of the MMA ?oonng. 2. Upon completion of the scarification of the existing flooring that all substrates and conditions are acceptable and shall provide a satisfactory surface for the Installation of the MMA ?ooring systems as required by these documents. 3. Upon completion of the application of the MMA flooring system. stir-Lasts: If a substrate or condition is not acceptable to the manufacturer, the manufacturer shall document discrepancies and provide copies to the Contracting Of?cer and Installer. The Installer shall remedy all de?ciencies and work shall not commence on the next phase of the ?ooring system until the manufacturer has provided the Contracting Officer with the appropriate Letter of Acceptance. 1. Maintenance Recommendations: Include maintenance procedures, recommended maintenance materials, procedures for stain removal, repairing surface, and suggested schedule for cleaning. J. Submit U.S.D.A. approval of the MMA flooring system used. 1.4 QUALIFICATIONS A. Manufacturer: Company specializing in manufacturing the MMA flooring systems specified In this section with minimum three years documented experience. All MMA flooring components shall be provided by a single manufacturer. B. Installer: Company specializing in performing the work of this section with minimum ?ve years documented experience, approved and trained by manufacturer for MMA flooring systems as specified for this project. The Installer shall have satisfactorin completed ten projects installing same manufacturer's identical MMA flooring systems of similar or greater size as this project within the last three years. C. Project ManagerfField Supervisor: Trained by product manufacturer, under direct full time supervision of manufacturer's own or plant trained foreman. The Project ManagerlField Supervisor shall have a minimum of two years experience as a ?eld supervisor and shall have satisfactorily completed five projects installing same manufacturer's MMA flooring systems of similar size as required for this project within the last two years. The Project ManagerfField Supervisor shall be full time on this project during all phases of operation of the coating operations. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 Section 09721-3 I MMA Flooring D. Installation Staff: All members of the installation staff shall have experience installing MMA flooring systems of similar type and size as required for this project. E. Written con?rmation of all requirements may be requested by the Contracting Of?cer prior to commencement of the work. 1.5 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS A. The Work under this section shall be in a confined and highly specialized space. Animals shall be present in areas adjacent to the work space. To minimize the effects of the work on these laboratory animals the requirements of these documents shall restrict the creation of airborne particulates and aerosols to minimum levels outside the Work area. B. The Wont area shall be segregated from all other portions of the building and the exterior. Minimum requirements shall include. but not be limited to. the following: 1. The Contractor shall provide 48 hour notice to the Contracting Of?cer prior to installation of any ?ooring materials. 2. Operation of the building's mechanical supply and exhaust systems in the Work area affects other critical portions of the animal care area. Thus. great care shall be taken to minimize any odors and particulate matter from entering the supply air stream. a. The animal care rooms are negative in relation to the corridor. That is. air flows from the corridor into each animal care space. 3. The Contractor shall provide a plan of mitigation to the Contracting Of?cer when potentially high particulate. aerosols. or fumes entrainment in the air is anticipated. The type airborne entrainment and the methods of mitigation shall be provided by the Contractor prior to the Notice to Proceed. a. No work shall commence until the plan of mitigation has been reviewed and accepted by the Contracting Of?cer. 4. Methods of mitigation may include. but not be limited to. portable fans and flexible ducts to exterior of building. and barriers between work area and occupied spaces of building. 5. Measurement devices may be utilized by the Government in adjacent spaces to insure that no fumes or emissions migrate from the Work area into adjacent spaces. 6. Refer to Section 01546 for complete health and safety and environmental requirements. 1.6 JOB CONDITIONS A. General. CDC has no provision to of?oad Contractor deliveries. Contractor staff shall be on site when all deliveries are made. CDC will provide information as to when and where offloading may take place. B. Deliver materials in original containers with labels and seals intact. 1. Conform to manufacturer's recommendations. including storage temperatures. precautions and protective measures. C. Store materials in dry protected area between 25? and 80D F. Keep out of direct sunlight. Protect from open flame and keep all containers grounded. 1. Prior to storing any materials on site. request permission from Contracting Of?cer. Location and length of time available for storage will be provided. D. Provide adequate controlled forced ventilation and uniform bright light. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) ihll? :12 US I: 5* 26?2th SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 09721-4 MMA Flooring CDC P2009453 FOR-I - I E. Material, air, and surface temperatures shall be between 25? and 35? during application and cure. Relative humidity In the work area shall be less than 85% and the surface temperature shall be at least 5? above the dew point. F. Existing concrete floors: After of existing flooring, clean exposed surface with solutions recommended by manufacturer. Contractor, Contracting Of?cer. and others as appropriate, shall visually inspect entire surface of ?oor after scari?cation for cracks and other de?ciencies. Contractor shall recommend whether crack repairs or other remedial actions are required after the visual inspection to Contracting Of?cer. G. New concrete floors: New concrete slabs shall have the following characteristics: 1. Concrete shall be moisture cured for a-minimum of seven days at 2. The concrete shall be fully cured for a minimum of 28 days prior to application of the coating system pending moisture test. 3. Surface contaminants, including but not limited to, curing agents. membranes, or other bond breakers shall not be used. 4. Concrete shall have a rubbed finish, float or darby ?nish the concrete. Do not use a hard steel trowel. 5. Set drains to the top of concrete grade, not the finished grade of the topping. 6. Concrete shall have a moisture emission rate of five pounds or less per 1000 square feet per 24 hour period as determined by proper Calcium Chloride Testing. 7. Vapor barriers andfor suitable means shall be installed beneath slab on grades to prevent vapor transmission through the slab. H. Protect adjacent surfaces from soil or damage. Do not allow traffic over coatings until fully cured. Post signs while work is in progress and while it is curing. Maintain area free of dust and other contaminants during application and until coatings are fully cured. l. Cove Base. Provide a 4 inch high cove base the same thickness as the ?oor on all existing Intersections of walls and horizontal surfaces. including floors and poured curbs. 1. Zinc angle. Provide a 1! if zinc angle at the top of the coved base with sealant as detailed on the Contract Drawings. 2. The sealant shall be tooled with approved tooling device in accordance with manufacturer?s printed instructions and recommendations. WARRANTY A. Provide ?ve year warranty under provisions of Section 01700. 1. Warranty: Include coverage against flooring delamination from substrate. separation of ?oor and base, and degradation of surface finish. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 BASIS OF DESIGN A. General Description: The basis of design for the MMA flooring system is the Res-Tet: RT 8053!. MMA Reactive Acrylic Flake Ffooring System. B. The components of the MMA flooring system include the following. The basis of design for each SENSITIVE BUT {ssui (mayo 2522mm CDC P2009453 I SENSITNE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 097?21-5 MMA Flooring is the Res-Tel: product number. awed PenetratinglReinforcing Primer: RT 710 with Comp. Coving: RTBOSwlappropriate RT filler Patchinngloping: RT 05 Resin, Filler PC Body Coat: RTBOS Self Leveling (consists of Res-Tek 805 resin and RT Filler SL wiColored Flake broadcast} Top Coatts): RT925 Sealer Resin Initiator: Res-Tek Powder Hardener Skid Resistance Bleached aluminum oxide broadcast into primer or body coat resin. 2.2 POLYMER CONCRETE TOPPING PATCH A. General Description: The polymer concrete topping shall be used to infill existing concrete ?ooring in the areas as designated on the contract drawings. 2.3 MMA FLOORING A. The body coat of the MMA flooring system shall be its" thick RTBOS resin and Res?Tek Filler SL with the color and texture as selected from standard manufacturers color samples. 2. 3. 4. General characteristics of the MMA flooring shall include, but not be limited to. the following: The topping system shall cure and be available to normal traf?c in no more than one hour at 68? after application of last coat. The cured material shall have a minimum compressive strength of 7,000 psi in accordance with ASTM C109. The cured material shall have a maximum water absorption value of 0.04 weight percent in accordance with ASTM D570. The cured material shall be chemically resistant to a wide range of acids, alkalis, salts. and other similar materials. The ?nished flooring system shall be uniform in color. texture, and appearance. All edges that terminate at walls. ?oor discontinuities, and other embedded items shall be sharp. uniform. and cosmetically acceptable with no thick or ragged edge. The Contractor shall work out an acceptable masking technique to ensure the acceptable ?nish of all edges. Provide textured non-slip surface as selected and approved by Contracting Of?cer for the MMA ?oonng. 2.4 PERFORMANCE PROPERTIES OF MMA FLOORING SYSTEM COMPONENTS A. Component: Primer. Basis of Design: Res-Tek 7'10. The product performance criteria for the primer are as follows: Progeny I_e_s_t Value Percentage of Reactive Resin 100% Percentage Solids 100% Water Absorption. Wt. lit: ASTM D570 Less than 0.6 Tensile Strength. psi ASTM 0638 3550 Tensile Modulus. psi ASTM 0638 230,000 BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEU) 4. . coc P2009453 Section cent?s .2633?:- -- - I: .. I Floorlng Coef?cient of Thermal Expansion. ASTM .ocopas Electrical Resistivity Volume Resistance, ohm-cm new 025? 1015 Surface Resistance. ohm ASTM D257 1012 Water Vapor Transmission gl'cm?hr?rnm Hg is 10:9 om 53122 1.4 B. Component: Polymer Concrete Resin Basis of Design: Res-Tek 05 Polymer Concrete Resin. The performance criteria for the cured polymer concrete are as follows: Progeny; Value Percentage of Reactive Resin 100% Water Absorption. Wt ASTM .02 Tensile Strength. psi ASTM D638 ?1200 Tensile Modulus. psi 105 ASTM pass 12 Coef?cient of Thermal Expansion. ASTM Doss Compressive Strength, psi ASTM 039 ?.800 ASTM C109 9.200 C. Component: Resin Basis of Design: Res-Tet: 805 SL Resin. The performance criteria forthe resin are as follows: Progerlg Value Percentage of Reactive Resin 100% Percentage of Solids 100% Water Absorption. Wt?itit ASTM DSTD .04 Compressive Strength. psi ASTM {3109 6.000-8.000 STM 0095 6.000 Tensile Strength. psi STM [3638 1.950 Tensile Modulus. psi ASTM 0630 230.000 Flexural Strength. psi ASTM D790 3.500 Coef?cient of Thermal Expansion. infinf?F ASTM 0690 .000019 Electrical Resistivity ASTM D257 Volume Resistance. ohm-cm 1014 Chemical Resistance ASTM 0543 Effect of Weak Acids None Effect of Strong Acids Slight Effect of Alkalis None Effect of Salt Solutions None Effect of Oil. Grease None Effect of Sunlight (UV Radiation} None D. Component: Sealer Resin Basis of Design: Res-Tait 925 Sealer Resin. The performance criteria for the sealer resin are as follows: SENSITIVE BUT iN FORMATION (SBUJ SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION CDC P2009453 Section 09?21-? I MMA Flooring Bram Essie Percentage of Reactive Resin 100% Percentage of Solids 100% Water Absorption. Wt% ASTM .05 Tensile Strength. psi ASTM 0633 3,850 Tensile Modulus, psi ASTM 0638 470.000 Compressive Strength. psi ASTM C109 6.0008900 ASTM 0695 6.000 Coef?cient of Thermal Expansion. ASTM D696 Electrical Resistivity ASTM Volume Resistance. ohm?cm ?5 Surface Resistance. ohm-cm 1i)12 Water Vapor Transmission icrn-hr-mm Hg DIN 53122 1.43 Chemical Resistance ASTM 0543 Effect of Week Acids None Effect of Strong Acids Slight Effect of Alkalis None Effect of Salt Solutions None Effect of Oil. Grease None Effect of Sunlight (UV Radiation} None E. Product Installation and Application Criteria. Basis of Design: Res?Tek MMA Flooring System. The following criteria for all components of the MMA ?ooring system are as follow: Pot Life at 15?20 Minutes Cure Time at 60 Minutes Recoat Time at sear: 50-90 Minutes 2.5 ACCESSORIES A. Treatment for Structural Cracks: Manufacturer's recommended product and installation method. 2.6 FLOOR COLOR A. The color will be selected by the Contracting Of?cer from the color samples of all the manufacturers standard colors provided by Contractor. 1. Field veri?cation of color by Contracting Of?cer required prior to commencement of work. 2. Existing MMA flooring coloring is based on the following mix design: a. MINA-1: 45% CF-1 15% (SF-13 10% CF-2 10% CF-3 15% CF-Q 5% (SF-19 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION sensitive sur UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SELJ) BBC P2009453 Section 097'21?3 trait? ?33 03 Hvscuoornomnows . MMA Flooring PART3 EXECUTION .31 EXAMINATION A. Review site conditions prior to scari?cation of existing epoxy topping and removal of coating on curbing to determine proper selection of tools and other devices used in the scari?cation and removal from the respective surfaces. B. Prior to commencing coatings work. measure surfaces and, as necessary, install sub-?oor ?ller recommended by manufacturer to insure that all surfaces are smooth and slope as shown by contract documents, and are ready to receive work. 1. Measure moisture content of surfaces. a. Concrete shall have a moisture emission rate of no more than five pounds per 1,000 square feet per 24 hour period as determined by proper Calcium Chloride Testing. C. Verity floor and curb surfaces are free of substances or conditions that may impair adhesion of any component of the flooring system. D. Do not proceed with installation of flooring system until unsuitable or detective work or conditions have been resolved and acceptable to the Contracting Of?cer, manufacturer and Installer. 3.2 PREPARATION A. Concrete substrate shall be clean and dry. Dislodge dirt, mortar splatterspaint overspray, and other dry surface accumulations and contamination by scraping brushing, sweeping, vacuuming, andior compressed air lowdown. B. Surfaces that are heavily contaminated shall be cleaned with the appropriate degreaser, detergent, or other appropriate cleanen'surfactant followed by thoroughly rinsing with fresh water to remove the accumulation prior to mechanical cleaning efforts. 0. Mechanical Surface Preparation and Cleaning. All accessible concrete floor surfaces shall be mechanically blast cleaned using a mobile steelshot, dust recycling machine. The basis of design is BLASTRAC, manufactured by Wheelabrator Corporation. All surface and embedded accumulations of paint, toppings, hardened concrete layers, laitance, power trowel ?nishes, and other similar surface characteristics shall be completed removed leaving a bare concrete surface having a profile similar to 40 grit sandpaper and exposing the upper fascia of concrete aggregate. 1. Floor areas inaccessible to the mobile blast cleaning machines shall be mechanically abraded to the same degree of cleanliness, soundness, and profile using vertical disc scari?ers, starwheel scari?ers, needle guns, scabblers, or other suitably effective equipment. 2. After blasting, traces or accumulations of spent abrasive, laitance, removed toppings, and other debris shall be removed with brush or vacuum. 3. Conduct Bond Tests to check adequacy of surface preparation. 4. Application of the speci?ed floor system shall be completed before any water or other contamination of the surface occurs. D. The selected removal process shall be able to loosen topping that otherwise appears bonded to the existing substrate without causing cracks or other de?ciencies in the concrete substrate. 1. Repair of cracks, rupture of the existing membrane waterproofing. and other deficiencies SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBLI) coc P2009453 I 252mm (b}[3}242 SENSITIVE BUT (SBU) Section 09721-9 MMA Flooring caused by faulty or de?cient workmanship. use of improper tools. the improper operation of any tools. or any other installation related circumstance. shall be repaired by the Contractor at no additional cost to the Government. After scarification of all existing flooring surface and the curbing. remove ridges and bumps. Fill low spots. cracks. joints, holes. and other defects with manufacturer's recommended sub-?oor ?ller. Clean concrete substrate according to manufacturer?s recommendations prior to installation of any component of the MMA ?ooring system. Apply. trowel. and ?oat ?ller to achieve smooth. ?at. hard surface. Grind or otherwise remove irregularities above the surface level. Prohibit construction traf?c until filler is cured. Vacuum clean substrate. Bond test. The following bond test shall be conducted to determine the adequacy of surface preparation and bond. The bond test shall be accomplished as follows. 1. Mix six ounces of the primer to be used in the application with #1 lit-#12 mesh. dry quartz sand until an easily trowelable consistency is obtained. Add 10% by volume Res-Tek Powder Hardener and mix well. 2. Apply to properly prepared substrate in palm size patties. us" to 13? thick at various locations in the area receive the topping. The patties shall be cured tacit free. approximately one hour (at and cooled to ambient temperature of concrete. 3. Remove the petty samples with hammer and chisel. 4. Examine the fractureidelamination plane of the samples. The sample shall have concrete with fractured aggregate attached to the entire underside of the sample to pass the test. a. If the sample only has laitance. ?nes. or a small amount of concrete attached. or if the interface behveen petty and substrate is tacky. additional substrate preparation shall be required and retested until the test is successfully passed. 3.3 A. Installation of MMA ?ooring system shall conform to latest manufacturer's instructions to produce a uniform monolithic wearing surface of thickness speci?ed. All installation instructions. products. mixing ratios. spread rate. and other manufacturer's recommendations and requirements are based on the basis of design MMA ?ooring system. For other products. use the manufacturer's latest written recommendations and specifications for the appropriate installation instruction. The application of the RT 805 SL Colored Flake Flooring System. the basis of design for the MMA flooring system. shall be as follows: Apply the primerl'sealer. Apply coving. Perform patching and sloping with RT-OS PC. Re?prime areas patched or sloped. Apply slurry of RT-BOS Resin and Res-Tait Filler SL. Apply two topcoatts). Open only the containers of component materials to be used in each speci?c application as needed. Refer to Manufacturer's data sheets for pot lifeftemperature relationship to determine SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED (SBU) coc P2009453 . 262m: HVAGMDDIFI-GATION-S FOR-I -- I IbiI3'3'42 LIE CI SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section MMA Fiooring size of batches to mix and mix ratios for each representative coat of the system. B. Measure. add. and mix the initiator into the respective resin components in the proportions recommended by the material manufacturer. Mix only as much material at a time as can be easily and efficiently applied due to the short pot life of the material. E. Application of the System. 1. Prime Coat. Measure. add. and mix the resin component and the initiator into the primer in the proportions recommended by the material manufacturer. a. Pour the mixture batches onto the ?oor surface and use a 9? or 18" wide. 1/2" to thick- napped. solvent-resistant paint roller to roll out the material at a rate of 100 square feet per gallon to form a uniform and continuous film. Ensure that all crevices. cracks. and other surface discontinuities have been saturated and coated. Use a paint brush to reach areas inaccessible to the roller. Do not leave any puddles; roll out any such accumulations. b. Allow the primen'sealer to cure. c. if any of the concrete has absorbed all of the primer or if the concrete still has a dry look. reprime these areas before applying wear coat or topcoat. Coving. Surface Preparation: If concrete walls are to be painted prior to installation of cove base. the bottom portion of the walls shall remain uncoated to the height of the cove base to insure a proper bond to the concrete wall. a. If walls are constructed of a non-compatible material or if a coating exists. a backer board of 11' Plexiglas or cement board cut to the desired height of the cove base shall be installed. The top of the back board shall be cut at a angle to create a beveled edge. b. The backer board shall be fastened using a high grade construction adhesive and countersunk screws or concrete masonry anchors. c. The cove base shall be installed according to the manufacturer's recommendations and shall be one of the following basis of design systems: (1) Trowel?On Cove Base consisting of a trowel applied radiusfbase mix with a termination strip installed at the top of the base. The cove base shall receive a broadcast and top coatfs) consistent with the flooring system. PatchinngIoping. Measure. add. and mix the Resin. filler PC. and necessary aggregate (if required) in the proportions recommended by the material manufacturer. Use mixture to repair any damaged concrete. or to slope any areas as needed. a. Once cured. material shall be re-primed before topping system is applied. Topping. Size the batches and mix according to manufacturer's instructions. The entire batch should be poured and spread at once. Do not let material remain in pail. a Spread the topping material with a gauge rake set to a depth of 11?3". trowel to a uniform thickness of 11'3" as necessary. b. Immediately after application. roll with a porcupine roller available from the manufacturer to release any trapped air from the topping. c. Broadcast Colored Flakes at a rate of 0.10 to 1115 pounds per square foot into the fresh material before it begins to cure. It is important that the ?ake rain down. and not be thrown into. the surface. d. to cure. e. Remove excess flakes by sweeping. blow down. andfor vacuuming. abrade surface to remove loosely bonded Colored Flake with a medium stiff brush on a swing style floor machine or abrade using medium coarse fiber pad. or stiff bristle push broom. Vacuum prior to next step. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEU) coo 92009453 I (maxim uses 262a[h} F. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 09?21-11 MMA Flooring 5. Top Coat. Apply with clean rollers at a rate of 100 to 125 square feet per gallon in the same way as the primerfseaier. a. Broadcast aluminum oxide, glass beads. or other suitable material into wet topcoat resin. The size and rate to be determined by the Contracting Of?cer. b. Allow top coat to cure. 6. Second Top Coat. Apply with clean rollers at a rate of 100 to 125 square feet per gallon in the same way as the primerisealer. a. Allow top coat to cure Cleaning. Installer shall remove any material splatters and other material that is not where it should be. Remove masking and covers, taking care not to contaminate surrounding area. The installer shall repair any damage from either the application or clean up efforts. Floor Accessories: Material around the perimeter of all floor drain. cleanout, and other similar item's frames shall be removed to allow the MMA ?ooring system to key into the void. The ?ooring materials shall not block the drain grate or other device from being removed in the future. Ridges and Birdbaths: The existing floors are relatively level and no change in the elevations of the floor is contemplated at this time. After the topping and primer coats have been installed. the entire ?oor area shall be water tested to assure adequate drainage to floor drains shown on the drawings. All areas of the ?ooring shall pass water test prior to the application of the Top Coatis). If an area is not allowing water to ?ow as designed. it shall be corrected by the Installer until the water flows as intended. 3.4 PROTECTION OF FINISHED WORK A. Cure MMA flooring materials in compliance with manufacturer?s directions and the requirements of these documents. taking care to prevent contamination during stages of application and prior to completion of the curing process. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ coo P2009453 Section 09900-1 evacmooracmons Foe-l -- -- Paints and Coatings PART - GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Surface preparation. B. Field application of paints. stains, varnishes, and other coatings. C. See Schedule - Surfaces to be Finished, at end of Section. 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 04810 Unit Masonry Assemblies. B. Section 07900? Joint Seaier's C. Section 08115 Standard Steel Frames. 1.03 REFERENCES A. ASTM 15 - Standard Terminology for F'aintq Coatings, Materials. and Applications. B. ASTM 4442 - Standard Test Methods for Direct Moisture Content Measurement of Wood and Wood-Base Materials. C. NACE (IMP) Industrial Maintenance Painting: NACE International. D. SSPC - Steel Structures Painting Manual. Vol. 1. Good Painting Practice; Society for Protective Coatings. E. SSPC (PM2) Steel Structures Painting Manual. Vol. 2, Systems and Speci?cations; Society for Protective Coatings. 1.04 DEFINITIONS A. Conform to ASTM 16 for interpretation of terms used in this section. 1.05 A. See Section 01300 - Administrative Requirements. for submittal procedures. 3. Product Data: Provide data on all finishing products. Describe the following: Vehicle type. Percent solids by volume. Method of application. Rate of coverage and dry ?lm thickness for each coat. Instructions for substrate preparation including priming. Recommended ambient temperature and relative humidity range. substrate temperature, moisture content and alkalinity at time of application. Recommendations which differ from speci?ed requirements. easewe SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) coc P2009453 I 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBUJ Section 09900-2 Paints and Coatings C. Color Samples: Submit two paper chip samples. 3 3 inch in size illustrating range of colors and textures available for each surface ?nishing product scheduled. D. Brush-out Samples: Submit IWO painted samples. illustrating selected colors and textures for each color and system selected with speci?ed coats cascaded. Submit on tempered hardboard. 12 12 inch in size. E. Manufacturer's Instructions: Indicate special surface preparation procedures. F. Maintenance Data: Submit data on cleaning. touch-up. and repair of painted and coated surfaces. G. Informational Submiltals: 1. Certi?cates andfor test reports showing that products meet specified regulatOry requirements. 2. Statement of applicator quali?cations. QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Manufacturer Quali?cations: Company specializing in manufacturing the Products speci?ed in this section with minimum three years documented experience. B. Applicator Quali?cations: Company specializing in performing the work of this section with minimum 5 years experience. C. Products shall meet UL ?ame spread 0; fuel contributed 5; smoke developed 15. per ASTM E84. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS A. Conform to applicable code for ?ame and smoke rating requirements for products and ?nishes. Products shall meet the National Architectural and Industrial Maintenance Paints and Coatings (AIM) Rule and local State VOC regulations. DELIVERY. STORAGE. AND PROTECTION A. B. Deliver products to site in sealed and labeled containers: inspect to verify acceptability. Container Label: Include manufacturer?s name. type of paint. brand name. lot number. brand code. coverage. surface preparation, drying time. cleanup requirements. color designation. and instructions for mixing and reducing. Paint Materials: Store at minimum ambient temperature of 45 degrees and a maximum of 90 degrees F. in ventilated area. and as required by manufacturer?s instructions. ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS A. Do not apply materials when surface and ambient temperatures are outside the temperature ranges required by the paint product manufacturer. Minimum Application Temperatures for Latex Paints: 45 degrees for interiors; 50 degrees for exterior: unless required otherwise by manufacturers instructions. Minimum Application Temperature for Varnish Finishes: 65 degrees for interior or exterior. SENSITIVE BUT INFORMATION (soul coc P2009453 HVAC-.MOD.IEICAT.IONS FORI- -- - - - I IbirEl.~I2 "1.10 D. E. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEU) Section 099006 Paints and Coatings unless required otherwise by manufacturer's instructions. Provide lighting level of 80 ft candles measured mid-height at substrate surface. Do not apply coatings in areas where dust is being generated. EXTRA MATERIALS A. B. See Section 01700 - Product Requirements, for additional provisions. Supply full containers of paints and ?nishes in sealed one gallon cans of each color; store where directed. Provide the following quantities: 1. Colors using 1 to 19 gallons: One gallon. 2. Colors using 20 to 49 gallons: Two gallons. 3. Colors using 50 gallons or more: Five gallons. Label each container with color in addition to the manufacturer's label. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 BASIS OF DESIGN MANUFACTURERS A. B. Epoxy Filler: Sherwin Williams 00.. Kem Catt?Coat HS Epoxy Paint: Shenvin-Williams Co., Tile-Clad HS PAINTS AND COATINGS - GENERAL A. Coatings shall have good flow and application properties; capable of drying or curing free of streaks or sags. B. Materials for each application shall be compatible with one another and with other materials with which they may come in contact. C. Provide accessory materials as recommended by coating manufacturer, whether or not speci?ed. as required to achieve speci?ed ?nishes. D. Gloss Ranges: ASTM D523: Paint Type Test Method Gloss Range Flat 85 degree meter Below 15 Eggshell 60 degree meter 5 lo 20 Satin 50 degree meter 15 to 35 Semi-Gloss 50 degree meter 30 to 55 Gloss 60 degree meter Over 65 COLORS A. All colors are to match existing adjacent surface finishes. B. A designated color may be required in one or more types and gloss. depending upon paint system speci?ed for each specific surface. C. Matching colors shall be exact. Manufacturer's nearest standard color will not be acceptable. ACCESSORY MATERIALS UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) SENSITIVE EIUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION coc P2009453 Section 09900?4 WW HVAC Paints and Coatings 262a[h} A. Accessory Materials: Linseed oil. shellac. turpentine. paint thinners and other materials not speci?cally indicated but required to achieve the ?nishes speci?ed; commercial quality. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.01 A. Verify that surfaces are ready to receive Work as instructed by the product manufacturer. B. Examine surfaces scheduled to be ?nished prior to commencement of work. Report any condition that may potentially affect proper application. C. Test shop?applied primer for compatibility with subsequent cover materials. D. Measure moisture content of surfaces using an electronic moisture meter. Do not apply ?nishes unless moisture content of surfaces are below the following maximums. with negative alkalinity: 1. Plaster and Gypsum Wallboard: 12 percent. 2. Masonry. Concrete. and Concrete Unit Masonry: 12 percent. 3. Concrete Floors: 8 percent. 3.02 PREPARATION A. Broom clean floors. 8. Surface Apportenances: Remove eiectrical plates. hardware. light ?xture trim. escutcheons. and ?ttings prior to preparing surfaces or ?nishing. C. Surfaces: Correct defects and clean surfaces which affect work of this section. Remove or repair existing coatings that exhibit surface defects. D. Mask as necessary to achieve a heat ?nish painting edge next to dissimilar surfaces. E. Furnish drop cloths. shields. and protective methods to prevent spray or droppings from dis?guring other surfaces. F. Post signs. Close off newly painted areas where possible. Remove signs when paint has dried. G. Marks: Seal with shellac those which may bleed through surface finishes. H. lmpervious Surfaces: Remove mildew by scrubbing with solution of tetra-sodium phosphate and bleach. Rinse with clean water and allow surface to dry. I. Concrete and Unit Masonry Surfaces to be Painted: Remove dirt. loose mortar. scale. salt or atkali powder. and other foreign matter. Remove oil and grease with a solution of tri-sodium phosphate; rinse well and allow to dry. Remove stains caused by weathering of corroding metals with a solution of sodium metasilicate after thoroughly wetting with water. Allow to dry. J. Gypsum Board Surfaces to be Painted: Fill minor defects with filler compound. Spot prime defects after repair. K. Concrete Floors to be Painted: Remove contamination. acid etch. and rinse floors with ciear water. Verify required acid-alkali balance is achieved. Allow to dry. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) CDC P2009453 FORI - -- -- I 3-32th- 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 09900?5 Paints and Coatings L. Galvanized Surfaces to be Painted: Remove surface contamination and oils and wash with solvent. Apply coat of etching primer. M. Uncoated Steel and Iron Surfaces to be Painted: Remove grease, mitl scale. weld splatter, dirt, and rust. Where heavy coatings of scale are evident, remove by hand wire brushing or sandblasting; clean by washing with solvent. Apply a treatment of phosphoric acid solution, ensuring weld joints, bolts, and nuts are similarly cleaned. Prime paint entire surface; spot prime after repairs. N. Shop-Primed Steel Surfaces to be Finish Painted: Sand and scrape to remove loose primer and rust. Feather edges to make touch-up patches inconspicuous. Clean surfaces with solvent. Prime bare steel surfaces. Re-prime entire shop-primed item. P. Metal Doors to be Painted: Prime metal door top and bottom edge surfaces. APPLICATION A. Apply products in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. B. Where adjacent sealant is to be painted, do not apply finish coals until sealant is applied. C. Do not apply ?nishes to surfaces that are not dry. Allow applied coats to dry before next coat is applied. Apply each coat to uniform appearance. Apply each coat of paint darker than preceding coat unless otherwise approved. E. Sand wood surfaces between coats to achieve required finish. F. Vacuum clean surfaces of loose particles. Use tack cloth to remove dust and particles just prior to applying next coat. G, Where clear ?nishes are required, tint fillers to match wood. Work ?llers into the grain before set. Wipe excess from surface. FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. See Section 01400 - Quality Requirements, for general requirements for ?eld inspection. CLEANING A. Collect waste material which may constitute a ?re hazard, place in closed metal containers, and remove daily from site. SCHEDULE SURFACES TO BE FINISHED A. Do Not Paint or Finish the Following Items: 1. Items fully factory??nished unless specifically noted. 2 Fire rating labels, equipment serial number and capacity labels. 3. Stainless steel items. 4. Architectural cast-in-place concrete. 5 Architectural precast concrete- Paint the surfaces described below under Schedule Paint Systems, with the exception of surfaces identi?ed in Section 09960 High Performance Coatings, Section09675 Seamless Flooringand Section 09965 Special Coatings?. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (sou;- SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION 3 -42 CDC P2009453 Section 09900-8 Paints and Coatings C. Paint both sides and edges of plywood backboards for electrical and telephone equipment 3.07 A. before installing equipment. SCHEDULE - PAINT SYSTEMS Interior Concrete Walls: Semi-Gloss Finish ?ist Coat: S-W Tile-Clad HS Epoxy 2nd Coat: S-W Tile-Clad HS Epoxy (7 mils wet. 34 mils dry per coat} Interior Concrete Ceilings: Match existing ?nish ?lst Coat: S-W Tile-Clad HS Epoxy 2nd Coat: Tile-Clad HS Epoxy (T mils wet. 3-4 mils dry per coat) Interior Concrete Masonry Units (CMU): Latex Semi-Gloss Finish ?Ist Coat: S-W Kern Gail-Coat HS Epoxy sealerffilier (60-115 sq. ftigai) 2nd Coat: S-W Tile-Clad HS Epoxy 3rd Coat: Tile-Clad HS Epoxy (7 mils wet. 3-4 mils dry per coat) Interior Metal, Shop Primed: Latex Semi-Gloss Ist Coat: S-W Kern Cati-Coat HS Epoxy sealen'?ller (14 mils wet, 10 mils dry) 2nd Coat: S-W Tile-Clad HS Epoxy 3rd Coat: S-W Tile-Clad HS Epoxy {4 mils wet, 3 mils dry per coat) END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION LUHE.4E coc P2009453 FOR-I - I SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 10260-1 Metal Wall Guards SECTION 10260 METAL WALL GUARDS PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 SECTION INCLUDES A. B. Anodized aluminum wall guards. Related fasteners. RELATED SECTIONS Section 01300 - Submittais Section 01351 Sustainable Project Requirements Section 04810 - Unit Masonry Assemblies Section 07'900 - Joint Sealers Section 09900 Paints and Coatings SUBMITTALS A. Product Data: Include physical characteristics. such as durability, for each impact-resistant wall protection system component Indicated. Shop Drawings: Show locations, extent, and installation details of each impact-resistant wall protection system component. Show methods of attachment to adjoining construction. Because wall guard speci?ed is custom contoured and fabricated to exact dimensions, shop drawings cannot be made from scale dimensions taken from architectural drawings. Samples for Veri?cation: For the following products, showing the full range of color and texture variations expected in each impact-resistant wall protection system component. Prepare samples from the same material to be used for the Work. 1. Wall Guards: 12-inchh long samples of rail and mounting bracket. Include examples of joinery, corners, and ?eld splices. Show end radius. D- List of References: As specified in Quality Assurance Article. E. Material Test Reports: From a qualified testing agency indicating compliance of each impact- resistant wall protection system component with requirements indicated, based on tests performed by testing agency within the past five years. 1. Wall Guards: Test data verifying the alloy composition of the rail and brackets. F. Maintenance Data: For each impact-resistant wall protection system component to include in maintenance manuals speci?ed in Division 1. QUALITY ASSURANCE SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION coc P2009453 I (more uses 2622mm 1.05 1.06 A. BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section 26 2 Metal Wall Guards Installer Quali?cations: A manufacturer-approved experienced installer who has completed installation of impact-resistant wall protection system components similar in material. design. and extent to that indicated far this Project and whose work has resulted in construction with a record of successful incservice performance. Manufacturer Quali?cations: A ?rm experienced in manufacturing impact-resistant wall protection system components similar to those required for this Project and with a record of successful in-service performance. 1. References: Provide references of at least ?ve completed projects utilizing wall bumper rails. of similar scope as this Project. listing: a. Project name. b. Linear feet of rail installed. c. Name and telephone number of contact. Source Limitations: Obtain each color. grade. ?nish. and type of impact-resistant wail protection system component from a single source with resources to provide components of consistent quality in appearance and physical properties. Product Options: lnfon'nation on Drawings and in Speci?cations establishes requirements for systems aesthetic effects and performance characteristics. Aesthetic effects are indicated by dimensions, arrangements, alignment, and profiles of components and assemblies as they rotate to sight-lines. to one another. and to adjoining construction. Performance characteristics are indicated by criteria subject to veri?cation by one or more methods including pre?construction testing. ?eld-testing. or in?service performance. 1. Do not modify intended aesthetic effects. as judged solely by Project Of?cer. except with Project Of?cer's approval. If modi?cations are proposed. submit comprehensive explanatory data to Project Of?cer for review. 2. Do not modify performance characteristics as de?ned by product requirements speci?ed in Part 2. except with Project Officer's approval. If modi?cations are proposed. submit comprehensive explanatory data to Project Of?cer for review. Impact Strength: Provide impact-resistant wall protection system components with a minimum impact resistance of 25.4 ft-Ibflin. of width when tested according to ASTM 256. Test Method A. DELIVERY. STORAGE. AND HANDLING A. Store wall surface protection materials in original undamaged packages and containers inside a well-ventilated area protected from weather. moisture. soiling. extreme temperatures. and humidity. PROJECT CONDITIONS A. Environmental Limitations: Do not install wall surface-protection system components until the space is enclosed and weatherproof and ambient temperature within the building is maintained at not less than 7'0 deg (21 deg C) for not less than 7'2 hours before beginning installation. Field Measurements: 1. Prior to taking ?eld dimensions. representative of manufacturer to visit site. evaluate the conditions. and report any conditions that prohibit the initiation of ?eld measurements. 2. Permanent walls and door bucks must be in place. All cutouts in wall at level of railing installation. such as electric. plumbing and service panels. air. handling vents. and ?re alarm boxes. must be located and indicated on ?eld measurements so as not to be covered by wall guard. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU [til-i3; :13 U5- I: if 202301. Wow-19Dl?lsetions FQRI. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SB-U) Section 10260-3 I Metal Wall Guards CDC P2009453 3. All measurements to be taken on site by authorized representative of manufacturer. 4. Field measurements must be taken to ?00 inch, and are to be taken level against the wall surface at the elevation at which the wall guard is to be installed. 1.0T MAINTENANCE A. Maintenance Instructions: Provide the manufacturer?s instructions for maintenance of installed work. Include recommended methods and frequency for maintaining optimum condition under anticipated traf?c and use conditions. Include precautions against cleaning materials and methods that may be detrimental to ?nishes and performance. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 MATERIALS A. Aluminum Extrusions: Provide alloy and temper recommended by the manufacturer for the type of use and ?nish indicated, but with not less than the strength and durability properties specified in ASTM 221 for 6001-03511 B. Stainless Steel: Type 304, stainless steel plate, minimum 0.08 inch, No. 4 satin ?nish. 0. Fasteners: Provide aluminum, nonmagnetic stainless steel, or other non-corrosive metal screws, bolts, and other fasteners compatible with aluminum components, hardware, anchors, and other items being fastened. D. Provide neoprene spacersfgaskets between any dissimilar metals for a Dialectic Break. 2.02 WALL GUARDS A. Basis of design manufacturer: Aluminum Wall Protection System? as manufactured by Life Science Products, Incorporated. Phone 1. Material: ?04 inch by4 inch. 6061-03511 aluminum alloy, extruded rectangular aluminum bar with lib inch radius edge. Federal Speci?cation QQA more. No variation in aluminum alloy permitted. 2. Face and edges: 120 grit mechanical ?nish prior to bending. 3. Finish: Clear sulfuric anodized .to military speci?cation A8025 Type II. Perform anodizing after all cutting, drilling, countersinking, and bending. B. Aluminum Bracket: 1. Material: ensi??r5511 alloy extruded aluminum shape with 0.200?inch radius edge vertical flange. Federal Specification QQA 200110. No variation in aluminum alloy permitted. 2. Dimensions: 3 inch offset wall to backside of rail; 0.13 inch minimum web thickness: 0.20 inch minimum flange thickness; 2.5 inch by 3.0 inch bracket face at rail; 2.5 inch by 3.0 inch bracket face at well. 3. Radius Edge: 0.200~inch radius edge on all vertical bracket flanges. 4. Finish: Clear sulfuric anodized to military speci?cation A8625 Type II. Perform anodizing after all cutting, drilling, and de-burring. 5. Location: a. 3 inch brackets at all locations unless noted otherwise. 0. Hardware: 1. Rail to bracket: 1M inch-20 by 3M inch stainless steel Phillips flat head, countersunk. machine screw with ?04 inch-20 stainless steel esna nut {nylon insert]. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SEU (bl?31242 262301} coc P2009453 I 2.03 2.04 SENSITWE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) Section tDZjO?d. Metal Wall Guards 2. Bracket to concrete block wall: #16 by 1-1i'2 inch long Phillips pan head. type A. stainless steel tapping screw. with a #16 by 1-1i'2 inch PVC masonry anchor. Set screw with pneumatic wrench to 30 foot-pounds of torque. 3. Bracket to gypsum wallboard wall: 1M inch 2 12 inch long Phillips head zinc plated round headed wood screws. D. Fabrication: 1. Tolerance: inch. 2. Shear and punch metals cleanly and accurately. Remove burrs. 3. Ease exposed edges to a radius of approximater 182 inch (1 mm). unless otherwise indicated. 4. Terminal ends must be an integral part of the rail. not separate components. 5. Radius terminal ends. 6. Terminal end sections: 3 inch radius bend continuing from plane of rail face towards wall and ending ?li?2-inch from well. a. Radius arc: 54degrees. b. Final 1.375 inches of terminal end to be straight. c. No variation in con?guration permitted. Contours: Custom-contour railing to existing wall con?gurations, protrusions, abutrnents. and interruptions. Maintain wall bumper rail's structural integrity and 3 inch clearance from walls. 3. Con?gure entire rail as continuous. Install terminations only at doors. electrical panels. ?re extinguishers and other in-wall mounted apparatus that local codes prohibit from blockage. 9. Fabricate inside and outside corners as an integral part of the rail construction. 10. Space wall brackets no greater than 4 feet apart. Determine exact bracket locations on fabrication drawings, and pre-drill bracket holes in railing. Countersink all mounting holes to match the mounting hardware. 11. Anodize aluminum following complete fabrication. then cover with 4 mil vinyl on all surfaces and wood crate for shipment. FABRICATION A. General: Fabricate wall protection systems to comply with requirements indicated for design. dimensions. details. finish. and member sizes. including wall thickness of components. B. Pre-assemble components in the shop to the greatest extent possible to minimize ?eld assembly. Disassemble only as necessary for shipping and handling. C. Fabricate components with tight seams and joints with exposed edges rolled. Provide surfaces tree of evidence of wrinkling. chipping. uneven coloration. dents. and other imperfections. Fabricate members and fittings to produce flush. smooth. and rigid hairline joints. D. Brackets. Flanges. Fittings, and Anchors: Provide wall brackets. ?anges. miscellaneous ?ttings. and anchors for interconnection of members to other construction. E. Provide inserts and other anchorage devices for connecting components to concrete or masonry. Fabricate anchoring devices to be capable of withstanding imposed loads. Coordinate anchoring devices with the supporting structure. FINISHES GENERAL A. Comply with NAAMM's "Metal Finishes Manual for Architectural and Metal Products" for recommendations for applying and designating ?nishes. BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION coo P2009453 HVAC.-MODIFICAT.I.O as real .. US Ci 2.05 B. C- SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Section 10250?5 - Metal Wall Guards Protect mechanical finishes on exposed surfaces from damage by applying a strippable, temporary covering before shipping. Appearance of Finished Work: Variations in appearance of abutting or adjacent pieces are acceptable if they are within one-half of the range of approved samples. Noticeable variations in the same piece are not acceptable. Variations in appearance of other components are acceptable if they are within the range of approved samples and are assembled or installed to minimize contrast. ALUMINUM FINISHES A. Finish designations prefixed by AA comply with the system established by the Aluminum Association for designating aluminum ?nishes. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.01 3.02 3.03 EXAMINATION A. Examine areas and conditions in which wall surface protection components and wall B. protection systems will be installed. Complete all finishing operations. including paintingl before beginning installation of wall surface protection system materials. Do not proceed with installations until unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected. PREPARATION A. General: Prior to installation, clean substrate to remove dust, debris, and loose particles. INSTALLATION A. General: install wall surface protection units plumb, level. and true to line without distortions. Do not use materials with chips, cracks. voids, stainsI or other defects that might be visible in the finished work. Install aluminum retainers. mountingbrackets, and other accessories in strict accordance with the man ufacturefs written instructions. Wall Guards: . 1. Stamp each railing piece on back with number to match numbered section on shop drawing. for layout at installation and for future reference. 2. Mount brackets to wall at no greater than 4 foot intervals. 3. Typical installation elevation. finished floor to top edge of rail: 12 inches. Alternate elevation to be approved by Contracting Officer if required by ?eld conditions. 4. Countersink all mounting holes to match the mouming hardware. 5. Fasten rail to each bracket with a minimum of two fasteners. 6. Locate all splices centered on support bracket. Fasten each rail segment with two fasteners. Align rail segments to ionn a smooth and flush installation, without any projections or warpages- 7. Provide continuous head of silicone at junction of bracket face to special coating on concrete at wall surface. D. Electrical Break Dissimiliar Metals SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU) coo P2009453 I Section 1Q250-6 Metal Wall Guards (mr3}:42 262aih} 1. Install ne0prene gaskets or spacers set in structural silicon sealantfadhesive at all items being installed having the capabilityr of Galvanic actionideterioration with the surface upon which the item is being installed and is touching. 3.04 CLEANING A. General: Immediately upon completion of installation. clean plastic covers and accessories using a standard ammonia-based household cleaning agent. Clean metal components in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. B. Remove excess adhesive using methods and materials recommended by manufacturer. C. Remove surplus materials. rubbish, and debris resulting from installation upon completion of work and leave areas of installation in neat, clean condition. END OF SECTION SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (SBU US PQQC coo 15050-1 BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS PART - GENERAL 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 APPLICATION OF THIS SECTION A. This Section applies to all other Sections in Division 15, as the work is applicable- SECTION INCLUDES A. .1537 J. 0153.0 General requirements for Mechanical work including: Arrangement of work and layout intent. 2 Quality assurance. 3. De?nitions. 4. Regulatory requirements. 5 Access door coordination. Pipe installation procedures. Piping materials are speci?ed under piping systems speci?cations. Valves. Piping Accessories. Pipe sleeves and seals. Electrical equipment and wiring. Accessories materials. Roof penetration counterfiashing. Temporary Ventilation Requirement Construction Purge Requirement REFERENCE SPECIFICATIONS: Unless Specified Othenivise, follow: A. B. C. Coordination of space, spacing of inserts and load limitation procedures of Section 01315. Material and installation procedures of Section 03300 for cast-in-piace concrete work. Material and installation procedures of Section 07500 for counterflashing of mechanical roof penetrations. RELATED SECTIONS 01.0.0.5?? Section 02300 Earthwork for underground utilities. Section 07?840 Firestopping at ?re rated construction. Section 0?900 - Joint sealers at non?fire rated construction. Section 09900 Field painting of mechanical work. Section 15810 - Sleeves for ductwork. SUBMITTALS: Follow Section 01310 and 01331. A. 1 010206 Schedules: Access door schedule if required- RECORD DOCUMENTS (b)(3i142 uses 262alh} 1 5050?2 ODE -- BASIC MATERIAL AND METHODS 1.06 ARRANGEMENT OF WORK AND LAYOUT INTENT A. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangements, approximate sizes and relative locations of principal elements. Provide offsets as required for coordinated installation. Provide equipment. materials and methods not shown or speci?ed. but required to complete the work. B. Design intent is to locate all equipment requiring maintenance or inspection in a readily accessible location. such as in service chases or mechanical spaces. Do not locate equipment above hard ceilings. Access panels are not acceptable. C. in ?nished spaces. conceal work within walls or chases. At suspended ceilings. conceal work above ceiling unless indicated otherwise. D. in ?nished spaces with or without ceilings. coordinate with other work. E. in ?nished spaces without ceilings. and unless shown otherwise. install work in most direct manner. parallel with building lines. F. Prepare composite drawings at a scale of 1M inch or larger. Show this work in relation to other work. Obtain written approval of proposed changes. Distribute drawings to other parties affected. G. Subject to approval. provide modi?cations in layout as recluired to prevent con?ict with other work or for proper execution. H. Do not install piping. ducts or equipment in elevator machine rooms. Locate fan coil units outside of room. Ducted systems to use side wall registers in the room walls. I. Do not install piping. ducts or equipment foreign to electrical equipment in electrical equipment rooms or telecommunication closets. J. Do not install piping over. around. in front of. in back of. or below electrical controls. panels. switches. terminals. boxes or similar electrical equipment. Drip pans are not permitted. K. Do not install equipment. piping or ductwork over electric panels and switch boards. Follow NEC requirements. L. Do not allow equipment. piping or ductwork to infringe upon working ciearances required by NEC. M. Position mechanical work for easy unobstructed maintenance access and operation. N. Coordinate equipment layouts with other work to determine roughing?in requirements. Do not scale drawings for dimension. Neatly arrange work. and in such manner overcome local interference to best advantage of the project. 0. Do not install aluminum or copper products where they will be encased in concrete. P. Any item containing asbestos is prohibited from use on this project. Q. Manufactured articles. materials 3: equipment shall be of domestic manufactur. Le. manufactured in the United States of America. 1.07 ASSURANCE: Unless other standards andlor more stringent provisions are shown or speci?ed. provide work meeting the following standards. A. 10.032106 Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Institute (ARI). RECORD DOCUMENTS U5 :2 so?? 7953.23 10i02i06 Pssolza?I .coc - - 15050-3 BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS Air Diffusion Council (ADC). American Gas Association (ASA). Air Movement and Control Association (AMCAJ. American National Standards Institute (ANSI). American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). American Society of Mechanical Engineers American Society of Sanitary Engineers (ASSE). American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). American Welding Society (AWS). American Water Works Association (AWWA). Associated Air Balance Council (AABC). Cast Iron Soil Pipe Institute (CISPI). Compressed Gas Association (CGA). Cooling Tower Institute (CTI). Copper Development Association Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association (DIPRA). Factory Insurance Association (FIA). Institute of Boiler and Radiation. Hydronics Institute (IBR). Manufacturers Standardization Society of Valve and Fitting Industry National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). National Environmental Balancing Bureau (N EBB). . National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). National Sanitation Foundation (NSF). Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors National Association (SMACNA). Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL): All material and equipment shall be listed, labeled or certi?ed by Underwriters Laboratories. Inc., where such standards have been established. Equipment and material which are not covered by UL Standards are approved, provided equipment and materials are listed, labeled, certified or otherwise determined to meet safety requirements of a nationally recognized testing laboratory. Equipment of a class which no nationally recognized testing laboratory accepts, certifies, lists, labelsI or determines to be safe, will be considered if inspected or tested in accordance with national industrial standards, such as NEMA, or ANSI. Evidence of compliance shall include certi?ed test reports and definitive submittals. RECORD DOCUMENTS 15050?4 BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS a. Pressure vessels and safety devices shall be listed and certi?ed in accordance with ASME Test Code. 1.08 DEFINITIONS A Listed: Equipment is "listed" if of a kind mentioned in a list which: 1. Is published by a nationally recognized laboratory which makes periodic inepection of production of such equipment. 2. States that such equipment meets nationally recognized standards or has been tested and found safe for use in a speci?ed manner. B. Labeled: Equipment is "labeled" if: It embodies a valid label. symbol. or other identifying mark of a nationally recognized testing laboratory such as Undenvriters Laboratories, Inc. 2. Production is periodically inspected by a nationally recognized testing laboratory. 3. The labeling indicates compliance with nationally recognized standards or tests to determine safe use in a speci?ed manner. C. Certi?ed: Equipment is "certi?ed" if: 1. Equipment has been tested and found by a nationally recognized testing laboratory to meet nationally recognized standards or to be safe for use in a speci?ed manner. 2. Production is periodically inspected by a nationally recognized testing laboratory. 3. It bears a label. tag. or other record of certi?cation. D. Nationally recognized Testing Laboratory. A testing laboratory which complies with OSHA regulations. E. High Containment: References to High Containment shall include all equipment. ductwork. piping. etc. that serve all ESL-4 and BBL-3E spaces and associated support spaces. All of these spaces are located North of Column Line G. 1.09 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS: SBCCI Standard Building Code (88C) 1994 version with 1996 Georgia Amendments. SBCCI Standard Mechanical Code (SMCD 2000. SBCCI Standard Plumbing Code (SPC) 2000. SBCCI Standard Fire Prevention Code 1994 version with 1996 Georgia Amendments. 01.00.03? National Board Inspection Code (NBBP). F. Nationat Electrical Code (NEC). including amendments by local Authority having jurisdiction. 1.10 ACCESS DOOR COORDINATION A. In general. arrange work so access doors are not required. Where mechanical devices requiring access must be concealed in ?nished construction. coordinate with other trades and submit schedule showing size and location of each door. B. Where doors are required. follow Section 03310. 1010206 RECORD DOCUMENTS 15050-5 LISC .. BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 VALVES A. Manufacturers: Named manufacturers are approved. Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. - B. Conditions: 1. 2. seems?) When two or more valves of the same type are used in the same service, all valves of this type must be from .the same manufacturer. Unless noted otherwise. valves shall open when handwheel or stem is turned in a counter-clockwise rotation and shall close when turned in a clockwise rotation. Valves equipped with gear operators shall function similarly. Gate Valves: Crane. Grinnell. Stockham. Powell. Nibco. Vogt. Globe Valves: Crane. Gn?nnell. Stockham. Powell. Nibco. Check Valves: Crane. Grinneil. Stockham. Powell. Nibco. Spring Loaded Lift Check: Nibco. Grinnell. Powell, Crane. Lunkenheimer. Hammond. Iron Body Silent Checks: Nibco. Grinnell. Milwaukee, Muessco. Ball Valves: Nibco. Grinnell. Apollo. Jamesbury. (Contromatics) Watts Regulator Co. Butter?yValves: Keystone. Hills McCanna. Grinnell. Jamesbury. Crane. DeZurik. J. Butterfly Valves (High Performance): DeZurik. Keystone. WKM. Norris. {Contramatics} Watts Regulator Co. 2.02 PIPING ACCESSORIES A. Conditions: 1. 2. Do not use gaskets or packing containing asbestos. Do not use fittings or ?anges manufactured in Asia. 3. Gaskets: Manville. Anchor. Flexitallic. DuPont. C. Isolation Flanges and Unions: Electric Pipe Line. Epco Sales. Harco Technologies Corp. 3 at industries. Tube Turns Technologies. Inc. D. Joint Sealing Tape: 3M. Crane Packing. Permatex. DuponL E. Escutcheons: One piece. set screw type. chrome plated steel in ?nished spaces; cast brass in un?nished; none required in concealed areas. 2.03 PIPE SLEEVES AND SEALS A. Pre-fabricated Patented Sleeves: Design Standard Manufacturer: THUNDERLINE. Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. 1 cm 2106 Exterior Walls and Floors (Non Fire Rated): Sleeves 1 Inch through 22 Inches: Thunderline Model WS. Galvanized Steel Sleeve. Sleeve 23 Inches and Larger: Thunderline Model W3. Galvanized Steel Seals. Seals: Thunderline Model Link?Seal. modular. mechanical type. multiple interlocking rubber. expandable links matched for sleeve assembly. a. For Standard Service'Applications (-40 to 250 degrees EPDM. b. For High Temperature orFire Seal Applications to 400 degrees F): Silicone. RECORD DOCUMENTS [0}[3ti42 U.S.C. {3 262301} 15050-6 BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS B. lnterior?to-Interior Sleeves (Walls): Fire rated and non-?re rated construction; steel pipe or 18 gauge galvanized steel. Floor and Root Sleeves: Steel pipe with welded-on collar to position top of sleeve 2 inches (50 mm) above floor slab. and 8 inches (200 mm) above roof deck. Make bottom of sleeve ?ush with underside of roof or ?oor deck. Size (ID): 1i'2 inch to 3M inch (13 to 20 mm) larger than penetrating element. including pipe insulation. 2.04 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND WIRING A. Motors: Follow Section 15055. B. Motor Starting Equipment: 1. Unless otherwise speci?ed. motor control centers, single and three phase starters and disconnect switches are speci?ed under Division 15. 2. Provide disconnect switches. magnetic motor starters and combination disconnect switches and starters which are an integral part of packaged equipment speci?ed in Division 15. Comply with material requirements of Division 16. C. Wiring and Conduit: Follow Division 16. 1. Unless otherwise speci?ed. power wiring from power source to motor starting equipment including variable frequency drive packages and from that equipment to motors including ?nal connections is speci?ed under Section 16150. 2. Wiring up to 120 volt from control panels to controliled) devices is classi?ed as control wiring. 3. Factory install power wiring from control(led] devices. motors and equipment to factory mounted starting equipment speci?ed under Division 15. Wherever possible. factory install control wiring. D. Control Panels: 1. BAS Control Panels: Follow Section 15900. 2. Packaged Equipment Control Panels: Assemble and wire with electrical equipment. interiocks. interconnections and controls- Design panels for only one incoming ?eld feed connection. 3. Other Panels: NEMA 1 general purpose enclosure for interior locations; NEMA 3R weather resistant enclosure for exterior location or when otherwise exposed to moisture. 4. Accessories: a. Internal Circuit Protection: For each motor. control circuit. electric heater and other circuits requiring protection. b. Control Transformers: Where required to operate at 120V AC maximum. c. Terminal Strips: Mounted within enclosure arranged for conduit entry. 5. Factory mount and wire devices required for equipment control. 5. Wire control panels so that only one switched ?eld power connection is required. E. Identification: Follow Section 15075. F. Electrical Characteristics: Verify that electrical characteristics of equipment furnished under this Division are in conformance with electrical services shown or speci?ed. G. Design Modi?cations: Follow Section 01600 for provisions on substitutions. When proposed products differ from design standard in size. characteristics or capacity. notify all concerned parties in writing of such proposed changes. listing related items of work affected by change. 2.05 ACCESSORY MATERIALS 1 RECORD DOCUMENTS uan 4: us c- P99 7" 15050-7 zeaallv one - - - - - BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS A. Hook type anchor bolts with pipe sleeves of size and length to suit the need. Make sleeves one inch larger than bolt diameter and half imbedded length of bolt1 to allow for lateral adjustment. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 PIPE INSTALLATION PROCEDURES A. Clean piping materials before installation to remove grease, loose dirt. mill scale and other foreign matter. Ei. Close open ends of piping and equipment when not actually being worked on. with ?ange cover, cap or plug to prevent entry of foreign material during construction. 0. Accurately alignI support and connect piping without forcing. D. Make allowance for expansion and contraction in piping systems to avoid strain to joints, hangers or equipment. E. piping whenever practical at common elevations. F. Space piping to maintain at least 2 inch (50 mm) clearance from any other object. including movement due to temperature changes. When piping is insulated. maintain 2 inch (50 mm] clearance between insulation and adjacent insulated piping, walls or other objects. G. install piping free of traps and with suf?cient slope to allow drainage to one or more points. In event that drainage is not possible due to structural obstructions and ?nished ceiling heights. provide additional drain valves as required to allow total drainage. Obtain approval on location of drain valves before installation. H. Locate piping to maintain access to and clearance around equipment. Locate piping systems to maintain (2.13 m) clear headroom in areas where piping is exposed to view. Do not obstruct coil pulis. ?lter removals, access doors or work of other Sections. I. Locate piping valve train connections for maximum serviceability. Arrange equipment piping connections so that maintenance may be performed with minimum impact to connected piping system. J. Provide accessible ?anges and union connections on supply and return connections of equipment. valves and other items which must be disconnected or removed for maintenance. Where unions are furnished as an integral part of equipment. additional unions are not required. K. Do not use all-thread (close) nipples. swaged nipples, or bushing reducers. L. install piping support system following Section 15080. M. Hanging from steel roof decks with rigid board insulation is not approved. Provide supplementary support as speci?ed in Section 05500. N. Hanging from steel roof or floor decks is approved only when there is at Ieast4 inches {100 mm) of concrete over deck. 0. Where pipe support members are welded to structural building framing exposed to the atmosphere. scrape, brush clean, and apva one coat of zinc rich primer to ?nished welds. 3.02 THREADED CONNECTIONS 1Ui02f06 RECORD DOCUMENTS use. 262a(h] 15050-8 BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS Ream pipe ends to remove burrs. Use only standard taper threads. ANSI 32.1. Make threads full. sharp. clean. and free of ?ns and burrs. Use Te?on joint sealing tape. Apply to male threads only. Conceal threads on chrome plated pipe. Do not use close or short nipples of a size where length of unthreaded pipe is less than width of a pipe wrench. Th redolets or similar code approved ?ttings may be used for branch connections. Slip joints are permitted only in sanitary drainage systems on fixture side of traps. Factory machine threaded ?anges per ANSI 815.5 in pressure rating conforming to piping system. 3.03 WELDED CARBON STEEL CONNECTIONS A. Follow ANSIIASME 831.1. and where applicable. ANSUASME 31.9 and ANSIIASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Welding and Brazing Quali?cations: Keep records and certi?cations required by code on tile and available for inspection. B. When required by code or speci?cation. welders shall be codi?ed in accordance with AWS, following speci?ed reference standards. C. Make welding connections using shielded metal or submerged Electric Arc Welding Method. D. Provide single-tree type butt welds. unless speci?ed otherwise, in accordance with ANSI 316.9 and ANSI 816.25. E. Mitered elbows are not permitted. Use long radius elbows. F. Welded branch connections may be used in place of welding tees. provided ANSI Code for Pressure Piping. B31 is met. G. Weldolets. thredolets or similar code approved ?ttings may be used for branch connections instead of reducing tees where nominal diameter of takeoff is one third smaller than main diameter. H. Do not use laterals and other joints requiring reinforcement to restore strength of joint to full strength of pipe. I. Whenever welding close to walls. ?oors or building protect adjacent surfaces with ?re proof cloth. Thoroughly clean surfaces of weld splatter. Follow applicable NFPA standards. 3.04 WELDED STAINLESS STEEL CONNECTIONS A. Follow requirements for welded carbon steel connections. except use Tungsten Inert Gas (116) Welding Method in accordance with ANSIIASME 331.3. 3.05 FLANGED CONNECTIONS A. Use carbon steel bolts and nuts for cast iron ?anges unless otherwise noted. Use alloy steel 1 for steel ?anges and High Strength for High Pressure Systems. RECORD DOCUMENTS tulle-a1: LIE EBEaln. 3.3.08 A. 3.09 A. 3.10 A. B. coc C. 15050-9 BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS Except for stainless steel piping, lubricate bolts or studs over entire thread length with graphite and oil mixture. Install piping to equipment without strain. Remove bolts in flanged connections or disconnect piping after installation. to demonstrate bolt hole alignment and fit, if requested. Provide gaskets at ?anged connections suitable for design pressure and temperature of fluid contained. Use ring type for raised face flanges, and full face for flat face ?anges. COPPER TUBING CONNECTIONS For solder or braze connections, do not use compression type ?ttings. Make connections following the Copper Tube Handbook of the Copper Development Association. Make soldered joints with Sb5 solder, and brazed joints with silver brazing wire. Refrigerant copper tubing connections shall comply with ANSI 331.5. PLASTIC PIPE CONNECTIONS For PVC piping, do not use adhesives, cements or sealers which have deteriorated or which will not spread smoothly. Join PVC piping by solvent-cementing following ANSIIASME 331.3. CONNECTIONS OF DISSIMILAR METALLIC MATERIALS Isolate connections between dissimilar metallic materials where galvanic or electrolytic action may occur. Use dielectric fittings for complete isolation using materials suitable for design pressure, temperature and fluid contained. Isolate nonuferrous piping passing through openings in structural steel with non?conductive material permanently attached to the pipe. PIPE SLEEVES, SEALS AND ESCUTCHEONS Sleeves: Furnish sleeves to other Sections as appropriate for installation. Space sleeves in concrete a minimum of 4 inches (100 mm) apart. Where gypsum board is installed on one side of stud partition only, provide additional sleeve support as required. Seals: At exterior walls and floors, install mechanical seals around pipe, in such manner to ensure watertight installation. Escutcheons: Install plates tight to wall or ceiling surface. VALVE INSTALLATION PROCEDURES Provide valves at branch connections to mains and at equipment. Use valves of same size as pipe in which they are installed, except for modulating type control valves furnished under Section 15950. Two position type (opentclose) control valves by Section 15950 will be furnished in line size. Install valves with the stem on or above the horizontal. under seat. Install globe valves with pressure RECORD DOCUMENTS 252301} 3.11 A. B. C. 3.12 A. B. 3.13 A. 3.14 A. 3.15 A. B. 101'021'06 15050-10 BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIAL AND METHODS Pack valves and adjust glands before final approval. Install valve extension stems and chain operators on valves 6 inch and larger where valve stem centerline exceeds {Sf-6? {1.98 m) above finished floor. Provide chain hooks where required, to prevent fouling of chains on equipment and to clear walk-ways. Terminate chains approximately 3-6" m) above ?oor. Install valves so they are accessible for operation. and free from interference when operated. Install butter?y valve to ?anges with disc in open position. Where butterfly valves are used in dead end service for future connections, install a spool piece of the valve ?ange equal to two pipe diameters. Terminate with a companion ?ange and blind flange. After installation, out threaded stud on valve bonnets and flanges to expose a minimum of 1- 12, but not more than 3 threads beyond nut. ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND WIRING: Follow Division 16. Unless othennrise speci?ed, install wire in conduit. Install control wiring for products under this Division except as speci?ed in Section 15900. Where equipment is furnished without factory mounted control panels or motor starting equipment. install internal control and power wiring to terminal junction or control boxes at one location for connection of ?eld wiring. MISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE WORK Provide concrete thrust blocks and other miscellaneous concrete work required for mechanical constructiOn. Provide housekeeping pad for all floor mounted equipment unless noted otherwise. Expand pad 3 minimum of 4" inches beyond the supported equipment outline including skids when appropriate. Chamfer around the top edge of the pad to remove all ninety degree comers. ROOF PENETRATION COUNTERFLASHING When roof mounted work is not furnished with integral counterflashing. provide metal counterflashing as speci?ed under Section 07'600. TEMPORARY VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS No air moving system may be operated without all ?lters in place and no open ends that could admit dirt and debris into the air distribution system. CONSTRUCTION PURGE REQUIREMENTS A minimum two-week building ?ushout period is required after construction ends and prior to turning the facility over to the Government. All ?lter systems will be replaced with new media before turning the facility over to the Government. END OF SECTION RECORD DOCUMENTS unwind: 0.5-: 262301!- 15060-1 HANGERS AND SUPPORTS CDC PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Pipe and equipment. support systems with attachments and inserts. 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01310 Structural Submittals.. B. Section 13930 Anchors, Hangers and Supports for Standpipe and Sprinkler Systems. C. Section 15070 Mechanical Sound, Vibration, and Seismic Control. D. Section 15180 - Expansion Compensators with Associated Guides. E. Section 15510 - Ductwork Supports. 1.03 DEFINITIONS A. Supports: Attachments. hangers, rests, inserts, couplings, anchors, saddles, guides, channels, nuts, bolts, plates, rods, supplemental steel and other miscellaneous components required to support the work. B. Hot Systems Content of pipeline is at or above 120 degrees (48.9 degrees C). C. Ambient Systems (B): Content of pipeline is not-heated or cooled and will remain at 60 to 119 degrees (15.6 to 48.3 degrees D. Cold Systems Content of pipeline is at or below 59 degrees ('15 degrees C). E. Plastic Pipe: Thermoset or thermoplastic, rigid or semi-rigid PVC, ABS, DWV. CPVC, PP and others. 1.04 Follow Section 01300. A. Shop Drawings: Custom fabricated supports only. Show sizes, weights, dimensions, materials and connecting methods used for support system. Indicate hanger and support framing and attachment methods. Coordinate design requirements with- those required by Section 150?0. B. Informational Submittals: Include with shop drawings. force diagrams and calculations showing load reaction and movements which determine supportsizing. 1.05 QUALITY ASSURANCE: Comply with; A. ANSIIASME I331 - Pressure Piping Code. B. MSS SP-SB, SP-GQ, SEES-Manufacturers Standardization Society Standard Practices for Application, Design, Fabrication and Installation of Hangers and Supports. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 PROTECTIVE COATINGS AND FINISHES A. Support and Anchor Material: Compatible with materials being supported. Protect against corrosion, abrasion and electrolytic action in accordance with M38 SP-SS and SP-BQ. 10!02f06 RECORD DOCUMENTS [b}[3}242 262301} P9 i 1 5060-2 HANGERS AND SUPPORTS 2.02 A. 7001.00.53 G. Use copper plated hangers and supports for bare copper piping. Use plastic covers on supports used for uninsulated stainless steel or plastic pipe. Where design. material. tolerances or post-factory assembly requirements prevent use of metallic factory coatings. apply multiple field coatings of zinc chromate primer. PIPE HANGERS. SUPPORTS AND ATTACHMENTS Manufacturers: Any manufacturer conforming to speci?ed standards is approved. Grinnell Figure numbers are shown for reference only. Type 1: Adjustable clevis hanger. carbon steel. Figure 260. Type 6: Adjustable swivel ring. split ring type. Malieable iron or carbon steel. Figure 104. Type 8: Extension pipe or riser clamp. carbon steel. Figure 261. Type 10: Adjustable swivel ring, band type. carbon steel. Figure ro. Type 20: Side beam or channel clamp. Malleable iron jaw with steel bolt and nut: steel hook rod with nut and spring washer. Figure 225. Type 28 and 29: Forged steel beam clamp with nut. Figure 292. Type 31: Light welded carbon steel bracket. Attach pipe with scheduled hanger or support. Figure 194. Type 32: Medium welded carbon steel bracket. Attach pipe with scheduled hanger or support. Figure 195. Type 33: Heavy welded carbon steel bracket. Attach pipe with scheduled hanger or support. Figure 199. Type 35A: Slide assembly for longitudinal movement. Carbon steel tee with stainless steel slide plate; carbon steel base with te?on slide plate. Travel: 10 inch (250 mm) minimum. Figure 25? Type 2. Type 359: Slide assembly for mum-directional movement. Carbon steel tee with stainless slide plate; carbon steel base with te?on slide plate. Travel: 10 inch (250 mm) minimum. Figure 257 Type 7. Type 350. Slide assembly. for multi-directional movement. Carbon steel tee with stainless steel slide plate; carbon steel base with teflon slide plate. Travel: 5 inches (12? mm) minimum. Figure 257 Type Type 350: Saddle type slide assembly for multi-directional movement. Carbon steel saddle and shield with PTFE slide plate; carbon steel base with teflon slide plate. Travel: 5 inch (12? mm) minimum. Figure 437; Type 1 slide base ?gure 438. Type 33: Adjustable pipe saddle support. cast iron. Provide locknut nipple. floor ?ange. and concrete pier or steel support. Figure 264. Type 39: Pipe covering protection saddle. Curved carbon steel plate up to 24 inch (610 mm) and alloy steel for larger sizes. Minimum 12 inch (300 mm) in length. Figures 160 through 165. RECORD DOCUMENTS my? at: LI '5 :2 252mm. i P990 Q. 15060-3 HANGERS AND SUPPORTS Type 40: Insulation protection shield. Carbon steel, galvanized, minimum 12 inch (300 mm) in length. Shields used with rollers shall be increased one nominal gauge thickness. Figure 16?. Type 41: Single pipe roll. Cast iron roll and sockets, steel roll rod. Figure 171. Type 43: Adjustable roller hanger. Cast iron roll, carbon steel yoke, roll rod and hex nuts. Figure 181. Type 44: Pipe complete. Cast iron roll and stand. Figure 271. U. Type 45: Pipe roll and plate. complete. Cast iron roll and plate. Figure 277. Type 46: Adjustable pipe roll and base. Cast iron base plate, stand and roll. Provide floor flange and concrete pier or steel support for floor support. Figure 2?4. W. Rigid Pipe Hangers (Anchors): In accordance with ASTM FTUS. X. Guides: Carbon steel spider type. Figures 255 and 256. Y. Trapeze Hangers: Steel channels (Unistrut) and scheduled individual hanger, roll or clamp support. Z. Uninsulated Tubing Support 1f2 Inch (13 mm) and Smaller: Tube straps or one hole clamps. 1. Shields for Vertical Copper Pipe Risers: Sheet lead. 2. Hanger Rods: Steel, cadmium plated, threaded both ends, threaded one end, or continuoust threaded. 3. Spring Hangers: Follow Section 150m. 2.03 INSERTS AND ATTACHMENTS A. Select inserts and attachments to suit loading conditions in accordance with manufacturer?s recommendations. See Section 01310 for limitations, taking into consideration that more than one trade may be applying loads to the device. B. Inserts for Placement in Concrete Forrnwork: Malleable iron, wedge or universal case with nut, galvanized finish. Size inserts to suit threaded hanger rods. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 INSERTS AND ATTACHMENTS A. Furnish inserts for placement in concrete slabs and beam formwork and masonry. Provide template, drawing or other instruction as required for correct location. B. Where concrete slabs form finished ceiling, make inserts flush with underside slab surface. C. Provide lock nuts on threaded hangers. D. Provide high density inserts and shields on insulated pipes. Inserts to be 2? longer than shields. 3.02 PIPE HANGERS AND SUPPORTS A. 1 Incorporate requirements of Section 150m within the support system. RECORD DOCUMENTS uses ragga-In 15030-4 B. Support piping systems in accordance with applicable referenced standards. Space plastic piping in accordance with manufacturer?s recommendations. Independently support concentrated weights such as valves. strainers, heavy ?ttings and where direction changes occur. C. Provide pipe system supports immediately adjacent to connected equipment. Do not support system valve trains and pipe risers on pumps. heat exchangers or other similar equipment. D. Supports required for hydrostatic testing of steam systems shall be permanent. E. Place a hanger within 12 inches (300 mm) of each horizontal elbow. F. Use hangers with 1 1.2 inch (38 mm) minimum vertical adjustment. G. Support horizontal cast iron pipe within 13 inches of each hub or no?hub clamp. with 5 foot (1.52 m) maximum spacing between hangers. H. Where cast iron pipe is suspended in excess of 13 inches (457 mm) by means of non-rigid hangers. brace pipe against horizontal movement. I. Support vertical piping at every ?oor. Support vertical cast iron pipe within 18 inches of a hub or no-hub clamp. lf intermediate support is required. provide support within 18 inches of a hub or no-hub clamp. J. Where several pipes can be installed in parallel and at same elevation. custom designed trapeze hangers may be used. Incorporate rollers. shields. saddles. lateral support limit devices. and similar apparatus in trapeze hanger design. K. Support riser piping independently of connected horizontal piping. L. Do not use sprinkler and standpipe system supports for non-sprinkler and standpipe system components. M. Attach supports to building structure or supplemental steel attached to building structure. Do not support piping from other piping. 3.03 HANGER. SUPPORT AND ATTACHMENT SCHEDULE A. Hot Systems ITEM INSULATED SYSTEMS Hangers Type 1 up to 2 Inch Type 41. 43 with saddle for larger Pipe Roll Supports Type 44. 46 with saddle Wall Supports Type 31, 32. 33 Floor Supports Type 46 with saddle Vertical Supports Type 8 Protection Type 39 Shield or Saddle 10f02l'06 RECORD DOCUMENTS 45 -. P990 262.3?1 . . ., B. Ambient Systems 1 DIU2IDB ITEM INSULATED SYSTEMS Hangers Type to with shield Pipe Roll Supports Type 44, 45. 56 with shield Wall Supports Type 31. 32, 33 Cast Iron Hook-up to 3 Inch; Type 32. 33 all sizes Fioor Supports Type 38 with shield Vertical Supports Type 8 Protection Type 40 Shield or Saddle Slide Assembly Type 35A. 353. 350 Cold Systems ITEM INSULATED SYSTEMS Hangers Type 1, 10 with shield Pipe Roll Supports Type 44, 451 45 with shield Wall Supports Type 31, 32, 33 Floor Supports Type 38 with shield Vertical Sopports Type 8 Protection Type 40 Shield or Saddle END OF SECTION RECORD DOCUMENTS 15060-5 HANGERS AND SUPPORTS UNINSULATED SYSTEMS Type 1, 6, 10 Type 44, 45. 46 Type 33 Type 8 None (biraiz42 PQQC 1 5075-1 MECHANICAL IDENTIFICATION PART 1 - GENERAL 101 SECTION INCLUDES A. Identi?cation of mechanical Equipment and piping systems. 1.02 QUALITY ASSURANCE: Comply with: A. CDC Design and Construction Standards Guidelines - Mechanical B. A131 - C. Submittals required in accordance with Section 01300. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 MANUFACTURERS Scheme for the Identi?cation of Piping Systems. A. Underground Warning Tape: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. 1. Terra Tape. EL Other Identi?cation Materials: Substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. 1. Seton Nameplate Carperation. 2. Brady Signmark Division. 3. Cral?tmark Identi?cation Systems. 4. DSG Sign and Label. 2.02 MATERIALS A. Color: Shall be as follows: 10i02}06 SERVICE Domestic Hot Water Supply (DHWS) Domestic Hot Water (DHWR) Hot Water Domestic City Water (DCW) Low Press. Steam (LPS) Medium Press. Steam (MP3) High Pressure Steam (HPS) Condensate Return (CR) Chilled Water Supply (CHWS) Chilled Water Return (CHWR) Reheat Hot Water Sup. (HWS) Reheat Hot Water Ret. (HWR) Vacuum (VAC) Deionized Water (DI) Fire Protection Lines (FIRE) Roof Leader (Drain) (RD) Breathing Air (BA) Liquid Nirtogen (LNZ) STENCIL COLOR SHERWIN-WILLIAMS NAME Orange Ret. Peach Light Orange Blue Light Pink Pink Dark Pink Light Gray Blue Light Green Brown Green Red Black Dark Brown Marmalade. SW1629 Peach Mimosa. SW161B Cellini Gold. SW1363 Oslo Blue. SW1785 Sweet William. SW1585 Fifties Pink. SW1593 Rasberry Sorbet, SW1560 Stardust. SW1228 Aegean Sky. Sea SW1743 Santa Fe Trail. SW1069 Magic Night. SW1201 Retro Rose. SW1047 Tree House. SW1726 Safety Red Black Wilk Rose. SW2292 Plastic Nameplates: Laminated 3-layer plastic with engraved black letters on tight contrasting background color. RECORD DOCUMENTS :12 LIE. - P990 15075-2 MECHANICAL IDENTIFICATION Plastic Tags: Laminated 3-laver plastic with engraved black letters on light contrasting background color. Minimum size; ?l 142 inch diameter (38 mm). Metal Tags: Brass or aluminum with smooth edges and stamped letters; minimum size; 1 1:2 (38 mm) inch diameter. Plastic Pipe Markers: Factory fabricated, flexible, semi-rigid plastic, preformed to ?t around pipe or pipe covering; showing service. flow direction and pressure. Schedule: OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF INSULATION SIZE OF LETTERS LENGTH OF ARROW OR PIPE (INCHES) (INCHES) (INCHES12-6 (64 mm -~152 min-10 (200-250 mm) 2122 (64 mm) 24? Over 10 {250 mm) 4 (100 mm) 30? Equipment 2 112 (64 mm) NA Underground Warning Tape: Provide orange underground marking tape for buried utilities with scheduled warning message printed in black letters. 1. Marking Tape: 5 layers of (152 mm) copolymer ?lm bonded together without use of adhesives; 5 inches (152 mm) wide; minimum of mils thick: tensile strength 160 pounds kg) per 8 inch {152 mm) wide strip. Elongation shall exceed 800 percent per ASTM D382-753. Print installation instructions down the entire length of the tape.- 2. Schedule: Utility Warning Message Sanitary Sewer SANITARY SEWER Cold Water POTAB LE WATER Non-Sanitary Sewer NON-SANITARY SEWER Fire Water FIRE WATER Stencil Paint: Base color shall be Sherwin William Industrial Enamel. E351421 or equivalent. Stencil color shall be as specified elsewhere. Valve Chart and Schedule: Typed schedule giving service, location and number of each valve. Valve numbers shall correspond to those shown on Project Record Documents. Mount schedules in aluminum frames with clear plastic fronts. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 INSTALLATION A. Plastic Nameplates: Install with corrosive-resistant mechanical fasteners. Do not use adhesives. El. Plastic or Metal Tags: Install with corrosive-resistant chain. C. Plastic Pipe Markers: Install so as to be readable. 10102;?05 RECORD DOCUMENTS (moi-42 Peso-m 15075-3 262ath I I 3.02 IDENTIFICATION A. Equipment: 1. Identify air conditioning units. air handling units, fans. air terminal units. pumps, heat transfer equipment. water heaters. tanks. water treatment devices. and all other equipment with plastic nameplates permanently attached to equipment. 2. Small devices. such as in-line pumps. may be identi?ed with plastic or metal tags. B. Valves: Identify valves in piping systems {except local plumbing ?xture shut-off valves) with plastic or metal tags. C. Above Ground Piping: 1. Identify piping. covered or uncovered. concealed or exposed. with plastic pipe markers. Tags may be used for diameters less than 34 inch (19 mm). 2. install markers on maximum spacing of 15 feet [4.5 m) on straight runs including risers and drops; adjacent to each valve and at each side of penetration of structure or enclosure and at each obstruction. 3. install markers suf?ciently loose to permit sliding along pipe for painting. D. Underground Piping: Bury tape continuously along entire length of each utility line. at a depth of 13 inches (45? mm) below grade. directly above utility line. I E. Controls. Control EnclosuresfPanels: 1. Identify each gauge. meter. switch or other device with plastic nameplates. 2. Control enclosurerpanel mounted devices shall indicate function below each device. 3. identify each enclosurefpanel additionally as to system service. F. Identify motor starting equipment furnished under this Division in accordance with Section 16050. G. Ductwork: Identify accessible hazardous exhaust (high containment) ductwork with stencil paint in most visible location. Identify every 15 feet (4.5 m) on straight runs. at drops and risers. on both sides of penetrations and obstructions. Provide hazard identi?cation labels only for the following systems. 3.03 VALVE CHART AND SCHEDULE A. Install chart and schedule in each mechanical equipment room in location directed. END OF SECTION 10f02l'06 RECORD DOCUMENTS 113 US E: 262310 mi: CDC 150804 MECHANICAL INSULATION PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Piping, ductwork, and equipment insulation, with related accessories. 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 15180 - Insulated block for Type 1 flow sensors and insulated ball valve handles. 1.03 Follow Section 01300. A. Product Data: Describe each insulation type. B. Schedule: Show each type of insulation. location and thickness. C. Samples: Each type of insulation and jacket on pipe and duct samples. Plastic pipe may be used to illustrate assembly. Include bands, tapes. fasteners. anchors and adhesives as applicable. Fabricate samples in cut-away manner to show all components. 1.04 QUALIFICATIONS A. Applicator: Company specializing in insulation application with at least three years experience. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 DESIGN STANDARD MANUFACTURERS: Manufacturers or model numbers listed are the design standards. Substitutions subject to Section 01600 are: A. Insulation: 1 Schuiler (Manuille). 2 An'nstrong. 3. Owens-Coming. 4. Knauf. 5 CertainTeed. 6 Rubatex. Pabco. 8. Premat. 9. Thermal Ceramics. 10. Manson 8. Metal Jackets: 1. Childers. C. Ceramic Fiber Blanket Insulation: Premier Re?neries and Chemical Co. D. Wire Mesh Jackets: A08 Industries Inc. E. Dther substitutions are permitted subject to Section 01600. 2.02 MATERIALS - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. Use materials with maximum rating oi 255050 for flame spreadliuel contributedlsmoke developed in accordance with ASTM E84. RECORD DOCUMENTS P99 15030-2 zezaini 3. Use insulation rated for temperatures encountered. 2.03 INSULATION A. Type A: Glass ?ber. ANSIIASTM C54i?; value 0.24 at 75 degrees (24 degrees C). Manville Micro-Lott Plus with vapor barrier. Owens?Coming Type with ASJ vapor barrier jacket. 3. Type B: Rigid glass ?ber board; ANSUASTM 0612; value 0.22 at 75 degrees (24 degrees C). with white foil laminate vapor barrier facing. Manville 817 Spin-Glass with AP jacket. Owens-Coming Type 7?05 with ASJ-25 jacket. C. Type W: Flexible glass ?ber wrap; ANSIIASTM 0553; non-compressed value 0.26 at 75 degrees (24 degrees C). with foil scrim; Kraft vapor barrier facing 0.75 (12 kgrma) density. Owens-Corning T-100. Manville Microlite Type 100 Faced Duct Wrap. D. Fire Barrier Duct Wrap: Insulation shall provide protection to the duct equivalent to a two hour ?re resistance rating and shall be acceptable to all applicable building. ?re and mechanical codes. 2.04 PIPING ACCESSORIES A. Aluminum Jackets and Bands: ASTM 3209; 0.016 inch (0.4 mm) thick jacket. stucco embossed ?nish with 3i'4 inch 19 mm) wide bands. B. PVC Jackets: One piece. 20 mil (0.5 mm) thick. pie-molded type. UV protected: Zeston 2000 with Penna-Weld jacket adhesive. PVC Valve and Fitting Covers: Zeston. Tape: Vapor barrier. pressure sensitive. Adhesive: Vapor barrier. com patibie with insulation. Glass Cloth: Untreated glass ?ber. 8 ozfsq. yd. {22 weight. Qatar-3.0 Canvas Cloth: Canvas. 1.65 ozrsq. yd. weight. thread count of 20 10. JP. Stevens Style 1658. Use Marathon Industries 130 Sure-Lag Adhesive. H. Knitted Wire Mesh Jackets: Type 304 stainless steel. 0.011 inch diameter wire; flat non- corrugated mesh; 3 stitches per inch width; 6 to 8 courses per inch length. 2-05 EQUIPMENTACCESSORIES A. Bedding Compounds: Non~shrinl