U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons APR2 82016 Roger Hodge The Intercept 114 Fifth Avenue, 18th Floor New York, NY 10011 South Central Regional Office U.S. Armed Forces Reserve Complex 344 Marine Forces Drive Grand Prairie, Texas 75051 (972) 730-8924 Request Number: 2016-03828 Dear Mr. Hodge: This is in response to the above referenced Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. The Office of Information Policy (01P) remanded this request for a supplemental release fo pocessing of your request wherein you seek a copy of all records pertaining to federal inmate Barrett Brown, register number 45047-177. In response to your request, staff located 175 pages of responsive records, which were forwarded to this office for a release determination. After careful review, we determined 89 pages are appropriate for release in full: 28 pages are appropriate for release in part: and, 58 pages must be withheld in their entirety. Copies of releasable records are attached. Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, records were redacted or withheld in full from disclosure to you under the following exemptions: (b)(7)(C), (b)(7)(E), and (b)(7)(F). An explanation of FOIA exemptions is attached. If you are not satisfied with my response to this request, you may administratively appeal by writing to the Director, Office of Information Policy (01P). United States Department of Justice. Suite 11050, 1425 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001, or you may submit an appeal through OIP's FOIAonline portal by creating an account on the following web site: httbs://foiaonlinesegulations.ciovifoia/actionioublic/home. Yo u r appeal must be postmarked or electronically transmitted within 60 days of the date of my response to your request. If you submit your appeal by mail, both the letter and the envelope should be clearly marked "Freedom of Information Act Appeal." If you have questions about this response, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, ke'S Brieschke. for Jason A. Sickler Regional Counsel Explanation of FOIA Exemptions Used by the Federal Bureau of Prisons 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(1) protects classified information. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(2) concerns matters related solely to internal agency personnel rules or practices. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3) concerns matters specifically exempted from release by statute. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4) concerns trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person that is privileged or confidential. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5) concerns certain inter- and intra-agency communications protected by the deliberative process privilege, the attorney work-product privilege, and/or the attorney-client privilege. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6) concerns material the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of third parties. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A) concerns records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes the release of which could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(B) concerns records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes the release of which would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(C) concerns records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes the release of which could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of third parties. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(D) concerns records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes the release of which could reasonably be expected to disclose the identities of confidential sources and information furnished by such sources. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(E) concerns records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes the release of which would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(F) concerns records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes the release of which could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or personal safety of an individual. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(8) concerns matters that are "contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions." 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(9) concerns geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells. C I M C A S E I N T * - - M A T I O N SUMMARY CDFP.m FEDERAL B U R E A U O F P R I S O N S U . S . D E PA R T M E N T O F J U S T I C E Name: Brown, B a r r e t t L a n c a s t e R e g . . . e r Number: 45047-177 Date: 03-12-2015 Institution: FCI F o r t W o r t h , T e x a s RATIONALE FOP C I M C L A S S I F I C AT I O N : M r . B r o w n m a d e t h r e a t s t o h a r m a n d k i l l g o v e r n m e 7 o f f i c i a l s . H i s t r i a l and c o n v i c t i o n r e c e i v e d n a t i o n a l media coverage making h i s case Broad P u b l i c i t y . SPECIFIC ASSIGNMENTS: D. BROAD P U B L I C I T Y A. S TAT E PRISONER Extensive media coverage C O O P WITNESS REGULAR CONTRACTUAL BOARDER E. T H R E AT S T O GOVERNMENT O F F I C I A L S . 3. D I S R U P T I V E GROUP X H I S T O R Y O F THREATS MEMBER SURVEILLANCE SEPARATION F. S E PA R AT I O N C. S P E C I A L SUPERVISION T H R E A T ASSESSMENT SPEC. M G T. C A S E SOURCE C F INFORMATION ( N A M E A N D REGISTER. NUMBER O F SEPARATEES, I F A P P L I C A B L E ) Rresentence I n v e s t i g a t i o n R e p o r t , d a t e d A u g u s t 8 , 2 0 1 4 , p r e p a r e d by E d i t h D. F o s t e r , U n i t e d S t a t e s P r o b a t i o n O f f i c e r , N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f Te x a s . News a r t i c l e , d a t e d D e c e m b e r 1 6 , 2 0 1 4 , f r o m t h e A s s o c i a t e d P r e s s , N e w Y o r k D a i l y News. News a r t i c l e , d a t e d J a n u a r y 2 2 , 2 0 1 5 , f r o m t h e A s s o c i a t e d P r e s s , T h e New Y o r k T i m e s . News a r t i c l e , d a t e d A p r i l 2 9 , 2 0 1 4 , f r o m D a r a K e r r , C N E T. News a r t i c l e , d a t e d A u g u s t 2 9 , 2 0 1 3 , f r o m R o l l i n g S t o n e M a g a z i n e . Prepared LH: •A-e/t1 Reviewed b y : F i l e ,,,, s h e : : - i n . Include documentation. N o t .Ard - o f t h e P r i v a c y Folder. t o b e f o r w a r d e d •_c t h e i n m a t e . F i l e ; C o p y - RegifJfi,,_ . D f t c o = i Q t e d f o r ::71"SEC R e v. 7"11''Ito.r b ; " k aGi Ar r4i; t BOP 2016-03828 1 of 175 NNW, , o n ' t BP-S340.051 N O T I F I C A T I O N - O F C E N T R A L I N M A T E M 0 N I TO R I N ( . 7 ( C I M ) AUG 9 6 C L A S S I F I C A T I O N O R D E C L A S S I F I C A T I O N = R E U . S . D E PA R T M E N T O F J U S T I C E BUREAU O F PRISONS F E D E R A NAME L REGISTER NUMBER Brown, B a r r e t t L a n c a s t e 45047-177 DATE INSTITUTION 03-12-2015 FCI F o r t W o r t h , T e x a s X I . C L A S S I F I C AT I O N This i s t o a d v i s e y o u o f y o u r c l a s s i f i c a t i o n a s a CIM Case. T h i s c l a s s i f i c a t i o n d o e s n o t p r e c l u d e y o u from t r a n s f e r , t e m p o r a r y r e l e a s e , o r p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n c o m m u n i t y a c t i v i t i e s recommended b y t h e Warden, but i t r e q u i r e s r e v i e w b y t h e Regional a n d / o r C e n t r a l O f f i c e f o r such p a r t i c i p a t i o n t o occur. T h i s c l a s s i f i c a t i o n w i l l b e r e v i e w e d ( d e p e n d i n g o n y o u r C I M a s s i g n m e n t ) b y t h e Warden o r R e g i o n a l O f f i c e w i t h i n 63 days t o determined i f a sound basis e x i s t s t o continue you as a CIM case. Y o u w i l l be advised only i f your c l a s s i f i c a t i o n changes as a r e s u l t o f t h i s review. Yo u m a y s u b m i t a n y o b j e c t i o n s t o t h i s c l a s s i f i c a t i o n d i r e c t l y t o t h e r e v i e w a u t h o r i t y ( a d d r e s s a v a i l a b l e trom U n i t S t a f f ) . A CIM c l a s s i f i c a t i o n n o t changed i n 60 days f r o m date o f t h i s n o t i f i c a t i o n i s f i n a l and m a y b e a p p e a l e d t h r o u g h t h e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e Remedy P r o c e d u r e . A. C I M ASSIGNMENTS Threats t o Government O f f i c i a l s / B r o a d P u b l i c i t y B. R AT I O N A L E F O R C L A S S I F I C AT I O N Based o n t h r e a t s y o u made t o h a r m a n d k i l l g o v e r n m e n t o f f i c i a l s , y o u h a v e r e c e i v e d t h e a s s i g n m e n t o f T h r e a t s t o Government O f f i c i a l s . A d d i t i o n a l l y , y o u r t r i a l a n d c o n v i c t i o n made n a t i o n a l m e d i a coverage making y o u r c a s e Broad P u b l i c i t y. INMATE S I G N AT U R E TYPED NAME G B. M e h a r e y O F S TA F F MEMBER DATE (IS I I . D E C L A S S I F I C AT I O N Rationale f o r removal. INMATE S I G N AT U R E [ 5 STI G N AT U R E O E F SYTA F F MEmBERM P D Record Copy - C e n t r a l F i l e ; C o p y - R e g i o n a l O f f i c e ( T h i s f o r m m a y b e r e p l i c a t e d v i a WP) R e A E A N TD E ( i f Review A u t h o r i t y ) ; Copy - inmate p l a BOP 2016-03828 2 of 175 c e s B P - 3 4 0 ( 5 1 ) o f M AY 9 4 crA NekuJI)tkau1e5 Writer Tied to Anonymous Hackers Sentenced to Prison By THE ASSOCIATED PRESSJAN. 22, 2015, 4:41 P.M. E.S.T. Inside DALLAS — An activist and writer linked to the hacking collective Anonymous was sentenced to five years in prison Thursday for threatening an FBI agent and helping share stolen data, marking the end of a criminal case criticized by free-speech advocates Barrett Lancaster Brown originally faced charges that carried more than 100 years in prison, but he pleaded guilty to greatly reduced charges last year. He will receive credit for the more than two years he's already spent in prison. Supporters say Brown was targeted by the federal government after sharing data hacked from the Austin-based defense contractor Stratfor. The 33-year-old was often quoted on the workings of Anonymous, a shadowy group of hackers that has staged several high-profile attacks on governments and businesses all over the world. Brown courted attention on the Internet with provocative tweets and YouTube videos — including a live chat he conducted while taking a bubble bath. But some of those posts also landed him in trouble, including one in which he threatened an FBI agent. Brown read a lengthy statement before he was sentenced, saying he broke the law to reveal illegal government activity going unpunished. If I criticize the government for breaking the law, but then break the law myself in an effort to reveal their wrongdoing, I should expect to be punished just as I've called for the criminals at government- i-ui c x u i p BOP 2016-03828 3 of 175 linked firms t o be punished," he said. 'When we start fighting crime by any means necessary, we become guilty of the same hypocrisy as law enforcement agencies throughout history that break the rules to get the villains, and so become villains themselves." He was arrested in September 2012, shortly after posting a video in which he threatened the FBI agent by name, promising to "ruin his life and look into his (expletive) kids." Three separate indictments followed, carrying a maximum sentence of more than a century in prison. Brown's lawyers won the dismissal of most of a broad indictment related to his posting a link to the Stratfor data. He eventually pleaded guilty in April to three counts: obstructing the execution of a search warrant, making Internet threats and being an accessory to an unauthorized access of a protected computer. The reduced charges carried a maximum sentence of more than eight years in prison According to plea agreement documents he signed, Brown admitted to sending online messages ''threatening to shoot and injure" FBI agents. Brown also acknowledged helping someone access the stolen data and obstructing the execution of a search warrant at his home. His mother pleaded guilty to helping Brown hide laptops during a March 2012 raid, and was given six months probation. The case drew attention as the U.S. Justice Department sought in recent years to subpoena reporters' phone records and force some to testify in criminal cases. Among Brown's supporters is , oneo f thejournalistswhoreportedo n theNationalSecurityAgency'sdomesticspying program revealed by former contractor Brown has continued to be published online while in custody with the help of his lawyers and supporters. Prosecutors have declined public comment but made negative and occasionally sarcastic references in court documents to the attention the case has received. Much of the publicity about Brown contains 'gross fabrications and substantially false recitations of facts and law which may harm both the government and the defense during jury selection," prosecutors wrote last year in a motion accusing Brown of trying 'to continue to manipulate the public." Pt tro, BOP 2016-03828 4 of 175 New York Daily News Writer tied to Anonymous hackers to be sentenced in Dallas Barrett Lancaster Brown, 33, will be sentenced Tuesday in Dallas after threatening an FBI agent in a YouTube video and linking to hacked government files in connection with the hacker group Anonymous. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Tuesday, December 16, 2014, 3:32 A M Face book Twitter Reddit EmailCommentsShare Print Share this LiRL ,. , 4 k ._;4.:, Dallas County Sheriff's Office Barrett Brown, freelance journalist from Texas, was arrested for linking to hacked government files and threatening the FBI agent in charge of his case in a video uploaded to YouTube. DALLAS — A Dallas man whose online activities linked to hackers landed him under federal indictment is scheduled to be sentenced in federal court. — I-Uj BOP 2016-03828 5 of 175 Barrett Lancaster Brown will be sentenced Tuesday in Dallas. The 33-year-old Brown was a writer often quoted on the workings of Anonymous, the worldwide hacking collective that has staged cyber-attacks on governments and businesses. He cultivated attention and followers on the Internet but came under federal investigation for posting a link to data stolen from an Austin, Texas-based defense contractor, Stratfor. Barrett Brown/via YouTube The 33-year-old was often quoted on the workings of worldwide hacking group Anonymous. FBI agents arrested him two years ago, shortly after he posted YouTube videos threatening an agent by name. He pleaded guilty in April to a greatly reduced set of charges but still faces more than eight years in prison. irk —,, isr,n1. ' BOP 2016-03828 6 of 175 Anonymous activist pleads guilty to threatening FBI agent Willie several charges were dropped, former Anonymous spokesman Barrett Brown pleads guilty to sharing stolen data and targeting a federal agent. • bYr • A p r i l 29. 2014 5:40 PM • comments • • • • I L , 1 , • FOI BOP 2016-03828 7 of 175 R-rest Before his arrest. Barrett Brown posted this video on You I tale threatening an M I agent. Screenshot by 1 While most members of the hacking collective Anonymous hide their lUces and identities. Barrett Lancaster Brow n was different. As a spokesman-like litnire for the group. he recorded videos of himselftalking and gave interviews to reporters. FO/Exotnpt BOP 2016-03828 8 of 175 eilbs / 4 0 1 I N He now faces up to eight and a half years in prison for some of that information he freely spouted. Brown, 32, pleaded guilty on Tuesday to federal charges of obstructing a search warrant, making Internet threats, and being an accessory to unauthorized access of a protected computer, according to the Associated Press. Brown's conflict with the authorities began in 2012 when he decided to go after FBI agent _ Y o u T u b e videos and tweets. In one YouTube video titled "Why I'm Going to Destroy,._ P a r t Three: Revenge of the Lithe," Brown speaks of ruining the agent's life. Brown said he targeted the agent because authorities were threatening to charge his mother with obstruction of justice for allegedly hiding a laptop that Brown said he himself hid. life is over," Brown said in the video. "When I say his life is over, I'm not saying I'm going to kill him, but I am going to ruin his life..." tcd ' w r i t " • A c t i v i s t for Anonymous arrested during online chat • Anonymous drops Zeta threat after return of'kidnappee • Anonymous threat on Mexican cartel going forward, source says Shortly after the video published, Brown was arrested during a raid on his Dallas home. According to the Associated Press, the authorities obtained three separate indictments against Brown. One of Brown's attorneysi. t o video should be protected speech. l d CNET at the time that the comments in the "It looks like he may have a very strong First Amendment defense to this," _ said. "Barrett engages in a lot of hyperbole, a lot of saber rattling, and he often speaks off the cuff and says sometimes things I don't really think he means. Without having talked to him it's hard for me to conceive of this as really a threat, as opposed to posturing, puffery." Ultimately, several of the charges against Brown were dropped, according to the Associated Press. Brown's sentencing will take place in August. 1Exenlot BOP 2016-03828 9 of 175 Brown Faces 105 Years in Jail Explore 2013 • Share • Tweet • Share • Comment • Email But no one can figure out what law he broke. Introducing America's least likely political prisoner By I S-e p t e m b e r S, 2013 • Share • Tweet • Share • Comment • Email Update: Barrett Brown has been sentenced to 63 months in federal prison, which include the 28 months he has already served, after pleading guilty to transmitting threats, aiding hackers and obstructing authorities from carrying out a search warrant. He must also pay $890,000 in restitution, according to Boing Boing and The Verge. The mid-June sun is setting on the Mansfield jail near Dallas when Barrett Brown, the former public face of Anonymous, shuffles into the visitors hall wearing a jumpsuit of blazing orange. Once the nattiest anarchist around, Brown now looks like every other inmate in the overcrowded North Texas facility, down to his state-issued faux-Crocs, the color of candy corn. Who Are America's New Political Prisoners? Brown sits down across from his co-counsel, a young civil-liberties lawyer named a n d raises a triumphant fist holding several sheets of notebook paper. "Penned it out," he says. "After 10 months, I'm finally getting the hang of these archaic tools." He hands the article, titled "The CyberIntelligence Complex arid Its Useful Idiots," to his lawyer with instructions to send it to his editor at The Guardian, Brown used to write for the British daily, but since he's been in prison, it's written about him and his strange legal ordeal that has had him locked up for nearly a year while he awaits trial next month. Should he be found guilty of all the charges the federal government is bringing against him — 17 - L,yrpgt •-t•,•• BOP 2016-03828 10 of 175 "1111•N , 0 1 6 . \ counts, ranging from obstruction of justice to threatening a federal officer to identity fraud h e ' l l face more than 100 years in prison. Given the serious nature of his predicament, Brown, 32, seems shockingly relaxed. "I'm not worried or panicked,' he says. "It's not even clear to me that I've committed a crime." He describes his time here as a break from the drug-fueled mania of his prior life, a sort of digital and chemical fast in which he's kicked opiates and indulged his pre-cyber whims h o u r s spent on the role-playing game GURPS and tearing through the prison's collection of what he calls "English manor-house literature." Brown has been called many things during his brief public career satirist, journalist, author, Anonymous spokesman, atheist, "moral fag,'' "fame whore," scourge of the national surveillance state. His commitment to investigating the murky networks that make up America's post-9/11 intelligence establishment set in motion the chain of events that culminated in a guns-drawn raid of his Dallas apartment last September. ''For a long time, the one thing I was happy not to see in here was a computer," says Brown. "It appears as though the Internet has gotten roe into some trouble." Encountering Barrett Brown's story in passing, it is tempting to group him with other Anonymous associates who have popped up in the news for cutting pleas and changing sides. Brown's case, however, is a thing apart. Although he knew some of those involved in high-profile "hacktivism: he is no hacker. His situation is closer to the runaway prosecution that d e s t r o y e d ' 7 . t h e programmer-activist who committed suicide in the face of criminal charges similar to those now being leveled at Brown. But unlike , who illegally downloaded a large cache of academic articles, Brown never broke into a server; he never even leaked a document. His primary laptop, sought in two armed FBI raids, was a miniature Sony netbook that he used for legal communication, research and an obscene amount of video-game playing. The most serious charges against him relate not to hacking or theft, but to copying and pasting a link to data that had been hacked and released by others. "What is most concerning about Barreffs case is the disconnect between his conduct and the charged crime," says i " H e copy-pasted a publicly available link containing publicly available data that he was researching in his capacity as a journalist. The charges require twisting the relevant statutes beyond recognition and have serious implications for journalists as well as academics. Who's allowed to look at document dumps?" Brown's case is a bellwether for press freedoms in the new century, where hacks and leaks provide some of our only glimpses into the technologies and policies of an increasingly privatized national security-and-surveillance state. What Brown did through his organization Project PM was attempt to expand these peepholes. He cid this by leading group investigations into the world of private intelligence end cybersecurity contracting, a $56 billion industry that consumes 70 percent of the U.S. intelligence budget. meet- t h e American Wikileaks Hacker "Barrett was an investigative journalist who was merely doing his professional duty," says 1757 — - i"The sentence that he is facing is absurd and dangerous. r in k f r ,e BOP 2016-03828 11 of 175 Xern/i t , " Brown grew up in the affluent North Dallas neighborhood of Preston Hollow, where, following his parents' divorce, he lived with his New Age mother.1"10-', a l w a y s believed her only son was special—he once wrote that she called him ''an indigo child with an alien soul." Among her house rules was that mother and son meditate together daily. She instructed him in the predictions of Nostradamus and made sure he kept a dream journal for the purpose, as Brown described it, 'of helping him divine the future by way of my external connection to the collective unconscious." (For her part, Brown's mother says she was progressive, but not 'New Age", and that her son's comments were made in jest.) The Rise and Fall of E n e m y of the State A precocious pre-adolescent reader and writer', Brown produced a newspaper on his family's desktop computer while in elementary school. When he started writing for the student paper at his private high school in the mid-Nineties, he quickly clashed with the paper's censors over his right to criticize the administration. ''Barrett always challenged authority, even as a kid, and anytime you go up against authority, you're going to get in trouble," says Brown's father, 7 - 7 1 " Yo u could sort of always see this coming." By the time he reached high school, Brown had discovered r ' a n d declared himself an atheist. He _ b y placing founded an Objectivist Society at school and distinguished himself from other second out of 5,000 entrants in a national - - - - - essay contest. (Brown now expresses regret over this.) By all accounts, Brown hated everything about organized education, preferring to follow his own curricula and chat up girls on the builetin-board systems of a still-embryonic Internet. After his sophomore year, Brown told his parents he wasn't going back. He signed up for online courses and spent his junior year in Tanzania with his father, a Maserati-driving conservative, safari hunter and serial entrepreneur who was trying to launch a hardwood-harvesting business. ''Barrett loved living in Africa," says his father. "He preferred adventure to being in school with his peers. We weren't far from the embassy that was bombed that year." Brown returned to the U.S. and in 2000 joined some of his childhood friends in Austin, where he spent two semesters taking writing classes at the University of Texas. After dropping out, he spent a summer doing what one friend calls a "heroic" amount of Ecstasy and acid before settling into the charmed life of a pre-crisis Austin slacker—working part-time, smoking pot and paying cheap rent in a series of group houses with enormous porches. Brown's roommates remember his rooms as being strewn with leaning towers of books and magazines—he especially liked Gore Vidal, P.J. O'Rourke and Hunter S. Thompson— but say he was not especially political. "After 9/11 and Iraq, there were a lot of protests in Austin,' says 'a childhood friend of Brown's. "I don't remember him participating in it or being extra vocal, but he was against it all like everyone else." As Brown built up his clip book and matured as a writer, his ambitions began to outgrow Austin. In 2007, Brown moved to Brooklyn with a group of old friends that called itself "the Texadus." Their Bushwick apartment emerged as a hub for Lone Star State refugees who liked to get high, crush beers and play video games. "People were always hanging out and coming and going," says 7 1 a childhood friend of Brown's who lived with him in Austin and Brooklyn. Among the apartment's large cast of BOP 2016-03828 12 of 175 r—Xegqlot characters were a crew of weed-delivery guys from Puerto Rico and Honduras who used the apartment as a daytime base of business operations. "They brought over an Xbox, bought us beer and food arid played strategy games with us," _ j s a y s . "It was a good cultural exchange for a bunch of skinny white kids from Dallas." As virtual-world games grew increasingly sophisticated. Brown spent more time in front of his computer. But he didn't play the games like most people. In Second Life, he linked up with a group of people known as "griefers," the term for hackers who in the mid-00s became known for generating chaos inside videogame worlds. Socializing on the bulletin board Lichan.org, they formed the first cells of what would later become Anonymous. In the documentary We Are Legion, about the hacktivist group, Brown waxes nostalgic over his griefer period, when he'd spend entire nights "on Second Life riding around in a virtual spaceship with the words 'faggery daggery doo' written on it, wearing Afros, dropping virtual bombs on little villages while waving giant penises around. That was the most fun time I ever had in my life." When everyone else went out to the bars, Brown stayed in. Aside from video games and the odd afternoon of pick-up basketball, he also pounded out columns, diaries and blog posts for Vanity Fair, Doily Kos and McSweeney's, as well as restaurant reviews and essays for weeklies like New York Press and The Onion's A.V. Club. Though he had some paying gigs, he published most heavily in unpaid, selfedited community forums like Dolly Kos and The Huffington Post. "Barrett wasn't really working in New York so much as getting by with the help of friends and family," says _ 1 Among his unpaid gigs was his work as the spokesman for the Godless Americans PAC, which led to Brown's first TV appearance, on the Fox News morning show Fox & Friends. In Brooklyn, Brown resumed shooting heroin, which he'd dabbled in off and on since he was 19. Over the years, doctors have diagnosed him with ADHD and depression. Accurate or not, the diagnoses suggest Brown was drawn to opiates for more than just the high. "When I joined him in Brooklyn in '08, Barrett was already basically a functional junkie," says '---Heroin did not mellow Brown when it came to America's pundit class. Brown's critique made clear he didn't want to join the journalistic establishment so much as lash it without mercy. Then, in March 2010, he announced in a blog post the goal of replacing it, of making its institutions irrelevant and rebuilding them in the image of an overly self-confident 28-year-old junkie named Barrett Brown. It was perhaps his first public manifestation of extreme self-assurance that could come off as imperious selfim portance. Brown himself did not deny it, once saying, "I don't think arrogance is something I'm in a position to attack anyone on." The project envisioned by Brown was a new kind of crowdsourced think tank to be "established with a handful of contributors who have been selected by virtue of intellectual honesty, proven expertise in certain topics and journalistic competence in general." He named It Project PM, after a called the' -7'" • Brown conceived his new network partly as a response to what he saw as the sad state of affairs at the two main homes for his work, Doily Kos and HuffPo. After years of vibrancy, both now suffered from t; " ("••• Y P Y r t - t " BOP 2016-03828 13 of 175 the watering-down of contributor quality," he said. At Project PM, he assured that "below-average participants will have only very limited means by which to clutter the network." How Anonymous Took Down the Music Industry's Websites With typical cigarette-waving flourish, Brown declared, ''Never has there existed such opportunity for revolution in human affairs." Had Project PM developed along the lines of Brown's original vision – as a kind of exclusive, expertsonly, friends-of-Barrett blogger network – it is extremely unlikely that Brown would now be in jail. Or that the FBI would have subpoenaed the company hired to secure its server, as it did in March. But Project PM ended up taking a different route. TZTT :The Rolling Stone Interview The event that locked Brown's path into a collision course with the federal government came on February llth, 2010, when he posted an essay on Huffington Post that he grandiloquently titled "Anonymous, Australia and the Inevitable Fall of the NationState." At the time, Anonymous was in the news after some of its hackers, in an action they called Operation Titstorm, brought down Australian government servers in retaliation for the government's attempt to block certain kinds of niche pornography. For Brown, Titstorm was a world-historic game•changer, a portent of an age in which citizens could successfully challenge state power on their laptops and neutralize government propaganda and censorship. In the comically aggrandizing tone that had become his trademark, Brown concluded, "I am now certain that this phenomenon is among the most important and underreported social developments to have occurred in decades." Among those taken by Brown's interpretation of Titstorm was a Boston Web designer and early Anonymous associate, who had emerged as a sort of quasi-spokesman for the group. Through , Brown gained entrance to the online inner sanctums of the hackers he thought were turning history on its head.i— , who was starting to feel burned out from fielding the barrage of international media requests, saw Brown as someone who could step in and talk to reporters for Anonymous. Barrett 'got it' in a way few journalists did," saysi " S o o n , he was one of us, and that pretty much set the course for everything that happened next." Brown always denied holding any official capacity as the spokesman of Anonymous, maintaining such a thing was not even possible given the amorphous nature of the group. Yet he embraced the media role with relish, sometimes using the royal "we" during interviews. In March 2011, Brown described himself to a visiting NBC News crew as a "senior strategist" for Anonymous. He also, along with b e g a n writing a book about the group, detailing the transformation of Anonymous from a community of ri:fcMr '7 e BOP 2016-03828 14 of 175 te 0'o .•• 1 amoral videogame-playing punks into an ethical crusade, assisting street protests across the globe during the Arab Spring. From the beginning, Brown's public role was a subject of internal controversy. A minority dismissed and attacked him as a preening "name fag" —Anonymous slang for people who use their real names and speak to the press. Others were more bothered that Brown was a ' moral fag," the term used by unrepentant griefers to describe the new generation of hacktivists who began flocking to the Anonymous banner in 2008. In We Are Legion, Brown makes his allegiance clear, hailing the hacktivists for turning a "nihilist, ridiculous group" into a "force for good." Yet something of the old griefer remained in Brown even after his and the groups politicization process had converged to take on the world of intelligence outsourcing. "He was just trolling the hell out of these corporate-surveillance guys," says a New York activist who assisted Brown in his investigations. "Not just doing the serious research work no one else was doing —getting tax files and all that—but calling them at their homes to introduce himself, sometimes straight up pranking them. He's legit funny and sees the humor and the absurd in everything." Another former colleague, a., s h a r e d Brown's love of prank calls: 'Sometimes we'd drink and prank-call lobbyists for fun. We went after this one group, (=wry's, because they were helping the kingdom of Bahrain handle its image when they were shooting people. So we'd call them up and 'dragon shout' at them," she says, referring to a sound effect in one of Brown's favorite video games, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim. By combining the two ethos of Anonymous, Brown won over more people than he alienated. Part of his appeal was the act of his drily affected pseudo-aristocratic-asshole persona, which he exaggerated during media appearances. He preferred a corduroy sports jacket to tne Guy Fawkes mask that Anonymous members favor. A typical portrait showed Brown's arm slung over a chair, a Marlboro dangling off his bottom lip and a stuffed bobcat on the wall behind him He was oth loved and hated for being one of the more colorful characters found in the Internet Relay Chat rooms where hackers gathered. He famously once conducted a strategy session while drinking red wine in a bubble bath. "Barrett became a bit like the court jester of Anonymous,' says[_ University who has written about the network. "His behavior was legendary because he was the ethical foil. Anonymous isn't ;ust for hackers. People like Barrett Brown can thrive: the organizer, the mediamaker, the spectacle-maker." When 137-CWn met h e was nearing the end of his three-year stint in Brooklyn. In the spring of 2010, Brown called his parents and told them he had a heroin problem. At their urging, he returned to Dallas and began an outpatient treatment that included the heroin replacement Suboxone. It was from a tiny Dallas apartment that Brown deepened his involvement with Anonymous. Since most of his friends lived in Austin, his new social life consisted of the iRC rooms populated by hacktivists. It was a world of nonstop, petty cyberintrigue, which to outsiders can appear like a hellish fusion of The Hollywood Squares, WorGames and Degrossi Junior High. •• e• " BOP 2016-03828 15 of 175 c ' : • • • ; ; . • • , • ? • •rc, t- T fit1116 Ot..7 Explains His Motives E - - - - - - - remembers the first time Brown crashed on his couch in Austin after his return to Dallas. "I'd wake up, and he'd be online having conversations with these kids on Skype or something," he says. Barrett would say, k n o w what you're doing!' The other guy would be stroking his chin like he's Dr. Claw, saying, 'No, I know what you're doing.' It was nonstop cyberwar, with these dorks just dorking it out with each other. It seemed like a bunch of kids trolling each other." zappreciated that beneath the dorkery, Brown was involved in serious business. This was Brown's first year as an unofficial spokesman for Anonymous, and it was eventful. The hackers were aiding the uprisings of the Arab Spring, and assaulted PayPal and credit-card companies in retaliation for their refusal to process donations to WikiLeaks. This latter action, called Operation PayBack, earned the attention of the Justice Department. In the summer of 2011, the FBI issued 35 search warrants and arrested 14 suspected hackers. The Trials of By the time of the arrests, Brown's focus had settled squarely on the nexus between government agencies, private intelligence firms and the information-security industry – known as InfoSec – contracted to build programs and technologies of surveillance, disruption and control that Brown suspected were in many cases unconstitutional. What's more, he was as bratty as ever about it. He phoned CEOs and flacks at their homes and called them liars. He boasted about bringing the whole system down. As the first raids and arrests took place following Operation PayBack, some observers of Brown's antics began to suspect that the court jester of Anonymous was not a very safe thing to be. ''You could just tell it was going to end badly," says an Anonymous member and veteran hacker. 'When he really started making noise about going after these Intel-contracting companies, I was like, 'You're going to get locked up, kid.'" After Operation Payback, Anonymous was on the radar of every private security firm looking to build a quick reputation. In the office of o f a struggling digital-security contractor called 1, it was the biggest thing on the radar.F7 was convinced that taking down Anonymous before it struck again was a fast track to industry juice and massive contracts. In February 2011, he bragged to The Financial Times about the supersecret sleuthing techniques he had developed to get the goods on Anonymous. He claimed to know the identities of the group's leadees. Implicit in LT comments was the possibility of federal raids on those identified. Partly to avoid that outcome, and partly out of curiosity, an Anonymous cell hacked- . s e r v e r s . They discovered that 7.--Itechniques involved hanging out on major social-media sites and compiling lists of mostly innocent people. It wasn't the only example of his staggering miscalculation. Within minutes, the hackers easily got around the firm's security defenses, ransacking company servers, wiping —.personal tablet and absconding with 70,000 internal e-mails.- d e v o t e d a segment to the fiasco, based around the image of j s t i c k i n g his penis in a hornets' nest. i' . 1 , ..•;••••• b•14,7 BOP 2016-03828 16 of 175 Once the hackers who broke into s e r v e r s discovered that w a s basically a clown, they abandoned pursuit. "There were tens of thousands of e-mails and no one wanted to gc through them," says an Anonymous associate who observed the' ' h a c k . "Everyone was like, 'We're not even going to dump these, because there's no point.'" Brown disagreed. When the hackers posted the e-mails on a BitTorrent site, he used Project PM to organize the painstaking work of collating and connecting the dcts to see what picture emerged. "Nobody was reading more than a couple of the e-mails before getting bored," says the Anonymous associate. "But h a s this strangely addictive and journalistic kind of mind, so he could stare at those e-mails for 10 hours. He'd be sitting alone in the77 ' c h a n n e l , yelling at everyone, 'You've got to pay attention! Look at the crap I found!" Brown quickly drew in some 100 volunteers to help him trawl through and make sense of the e-mails. The _ .• i c a c h e offered one of the fullest looks ever at how corporate-state partnerships were targeting groups they considered subversive or inimical to the interests of corporate America. The projects under consideration at r a n g e d from cyberattack5 and disinformation campaigns targeting civic groups and journalists to Weird Science-supermodel avatars built to infiltrate and disrupt left-wing and anarchist networks. Project PM volunteer investigator - - l r e m e m b e r s the disturbing thrill of uncovering use of a Maxim pinup to create online personas designed to spy for corporate and government clients. "I couldn't believe how much crazy shit they were up to,"! H7)iC: 'says. "My brain still feels like it's going to explode." The biggest fish flopping in Brown's net was the story of a cluster of contractors known as Team Themis. The origins of Team Themis dated to Bank of America's alarm over 2 0 1 0 claim to possess documents that "could take down a bank or two." The Department of Justice recommended Bank of America retain the services of the white-shoe D.C. law firm Hunton & Williams and the high-powered intelligence contractor O n behalf of Bank of America, Hunton & Williams turned to the large and growing world of InfoSec subcontractors to come up with a plan, settling on l a n d t w o dataintelligenceshops,BericoTechnologiesandPalantirTechnologies. The 1 1 t h r e e were also preparing a proposal for Hunton & Williams on behalf of another client, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The leaked d o c u m e n t s revealed that i w a s exploring ways of discrediting and disrupting the activities of organized labor and its allies for the Chamber. The potential money at stake in these contracts was considerable. According to Wired, the trio proposed that the Chamber create a S2-milliona-month sort of cyber special-forces team "of the kind developed and utilized by the Joint Special Operations Command." They also suggested targeting a range of left-ofcenter organizations, including the SEIU, watchdog groups like U.S. Chamber Watch, and the Center for American Progress. (The Chamber of Commerce and Bank of America have denied ever hiring Team I o r having any knowledge of the proposals.) -7-, t As .7 BOP 2016-03828 17 of 175 In pursuit of the Chamber and Bank of America contracts, the , t h r e e devised multipronged campaigns amounting to a private-sector information-age _ t h e FBI's program to infiltrate and undermine ' subversive" groups between 1956 and 1971. Among the The mis ideas presented to Hunton & Williams: "Feed the fuel between the feuding groups. Disinformation. Create messages around actions to sabotage or discredit the opposing organization. Submit fake documents and then call out the error." The revelations represented a triumph for Brown and his wild. A group of Democratic congressmen asked four Republican committee chairs to hold hearings on the 'deeply troubling" question of whether "tactics developed for use against terrorists may have been unleashed illegally against American citizens." But the calls for investigation went nowhere. The lack of outrage in Washington or on influential editorial pages didn't shock Brown, who had long ago lost hope in the politicians and pundits who are "clearly intent on killing off even this belated scrutiny into the invisible empire that so thoroughly scrutinizes us a t our own expense and to unknown ends." It was Brown's finest moment, but his relationship with Anonymous was rapidly deteriorating. By May 2011, Brown had begun turning on the network. "There's little quality control in a movement like (Anonymous]," Brown told an interviewer. "you attract a lot of people whose interest is in fucking with video-game companies." Brown's haughty dismissal of the new crop of hacktivists was not a feeling shared by the FBI. The government continued to see Anonymous as a major and growing threat. And in the summer of 2011, it acquired a key piece in its operation to destroy the network. On the night of June 7th, four months after the - - - hack, two federal agents visited the _ p u b l i c h o u s i n g project on Manhattan's Lower East Side and introduced themselves to a 27-year-old unemployed hacker namedE known inside Anonymous as '' . " As a leader of an Anonymous offshoot calledL 7 he had hacked a number of state and corporate servers. In early 2011, he made some rookie errors that led the FBI to his door: Facing the prospect of being indicted on 12 counts cf criminal conspiracy, r o l l e d over on his old hacker associates. lie signed a cooperation agreement and began feeding the FBI information on Anonymous plots. The biggest of these involved a private global intelligence contractor located in Barrett Brown's backyard, the Austin-based In early December 2011, a young Chicago Anon named s r a c k e d r s e r v e r and downloaded some 5 million internal documents. With the apparent blessing and supervision of the FBI, iprovided the server for t o store the docs. t h e n proceeded to release them to the public. Sifting through the data dump would require a massive coordinated effort of exactly the kind Project PM had been training for. Brown and his dedicated volunteers attacked the mountains of emails. "We had between 30 and 50 peop'e involved, usually 15 at a time," says, t h e Boston Project PM volunteer who now helps organize Brown's legaidefense fund. Did the Mainstream Media Fail ' 7 V r ' After six months of work, Brown would discover what he considered the fattest spider amid the miles of ;web: a San Diego-based cybersecurity firm called Cubic. As Brown folibwe,d,the strings, he ' 1.• BOP 2016-03828 18 of 175 discovered links between Cubic and a data-mining contractor known as TrapWire, which had ties to CIA vets. Brown thought that he had stumbled on a major find illuminating new technologies for spying and surveillance, but the media pickup was not what Brown had hoped. Major dailies shrugged off the story, and J a n d p o u r e d cold water on his alarm, calling it "outlandish." Brown responded to the criticism with a rambling, connect-the-conspiracy-dots vouTube video. It wasn't just gossip sites that viewed Brown's reading of the _ d o c s with a skeptical eye. Even sympathetic students of intelligence contracting urged caution about interpreting the TrapWire materials. "I applaud anyone digging into this stuff, but you can't really draw conclusions from what these contractors say in these e-mails because they're bragging and they're trying to land business," says , whose2008bookSpiesf o r Hirefirstexposedt h e scopeo f theintelligence-contracting industry. "Some of the quote-unquote intelligence thatI7 _ A w a s reporting on was ludicrous. Why would an intelligence agency buy this stuff?" Emails: A Secret Indictment Against Meanwhile, deeply buried in the Trap Wire debate was the fact that included in the d o c s were the credit-card numbers of 5,000:— j c l i e n t s , Brown likely did not give the numbers a second thought. But it's these numbers that form the most serious charges against Brown. The government alleges that when Brown pasted a link in a chat room to the alreadyleaked documents, he was intentionally "transferring" data for the purpose of credit-card and identity fraud. "If the Pentagon Papers included creditca rd info, then would The New York Times have been barred from researching them?" says Brown's ea-counsel " T h e r e is nothing to indicate wanted to profit from this information, or that he ever had the information in his possession. He was openly critical of such motives and disapprovec of hacking for the sake of it. This was a big part of his rift with Anonymous— why he was considered a 'moral fag' by some." The FBI raided Brown's Dallas apartment on the morning of March 6th, 2012, three months after the ihack, and one day after w a s arrested in Chicago. More than a dozen feds led by agent!' 7 . k n o c k e d down the door with warrants for Brown's computers and seized his Xbox. Brown was staying at his mother's house nearby. Later that morning, the agents appeared at the home of Brown's mother with a second warrant. They found his laptop in a kitchen cabinet, and she was later charged with obstruction, Brown, who was in the shower preparing for a TV interview when the agents arrived, was not arrested. The agents left with his laptop. Among hacktivists, theories differ on the motive behind the FBI action. As one of the few public figures associated with Anonymous, Brown made a soft target with a potentially very valuable hard drive or two. Some say it was meant as a warning; others say Brown had simply pissed off too many powerful people, or was getting too close to something big. Then there is the theory, advanced byr frustration with a blown sting against that Brown and - , w e r e targeted out of —*under 1 After looking into the hack, [1: ] b e l i e v e s that the FBI allowed the hack to proceed not in order to arrest „IS I b u t r• i• , t 4 41 BOP 2016-03828 19 of 175 oslik 17-7.-71"The idea was to have s e l l the stolen l m a t e r i a l t o r - 7 7 7 7 . says - "This would give them a concrete charge that he had knowingly bought stolen material to distribute on E - believes — g o t wind of p l a n to sell the documents to a n d dumped them before the transaction could take place. While there is no proof of contact betweeni— 'ireportedly communicated with , a teenage ' v o l u n t e e r and an jihad no idea what he'd done," says " T h e FBI were a day away from having evidence against Yet w s c r e w e d i t upf o r them.That'swhytheywentafterhimsohard." h o led the h a c k , faced only 30 years before cutting a plea deal for 10. Why is Brown facing 105? Following the March raid, Brown continued his investigations and planned for the future of Project PM. 2012 was going to be a big year. He had a new nucleus of friends and colleagues in Boston, where he was going to move and live in an activist group house. His investigations increasingly took place outside the Anonymous network. Brown had new allies in groups like - - - - ' a collective that operated its own crowdsourcing investigations into the cybersurveillance industry. That summer, he visited New York for the Hackers on Planet Earth conference, an annual gathering of hackers and activists, where he met a few of his Project PM colleagues offline for the first time. "I remember he was wearing a full suit in this crazy heat, sweating profusely in the lobby of the Hotel Pennsylvania," saysl I "He was still struggling with kicking heroin, he had tremors and looked like he was in a lot of pain. But he was full of energy. He was telling everyone, 'We're going to the center of the Earth with this story!'" But Brown's mental state seemed to deteriorate during the summer of 2012. Having battled depression throughout his life, he had gone off his meds and was simultaneously struggling with cold-turkey breaks from Suboxone for heroin withdrawal. His YouTube channel documents the effects. In August, Brown posted a clip that showed him skeet-shooting over the words of Caligula's lament: "If only all of Rome had just one neck." In early September, as Brown planned his move to Boston, he struggled to contain his rage at the local FBI agent , who had raided his mother's home and taken his beloved Xbox. In September, Brown uploaded a discombobulated three-part video series, the last one titled "Why I'm Going to Destroy FBI Agent — I n the videos, Brown struggles to maintain focus. He demands the return of his Xbox and warns that he comes from a military family that has trained him with weapons –weapons he says he'll use to defend his home. He calls' I , la "fucking chickenshit little faggot cocksucker" before uttering the words he has since admitted were ill-considered, as well as the result of a chemically combustive mental state. Why Shouldn't Freedom of the Press Apply to_ BOP 2016-03828 20 of 175 MilsN l o o k k life is over," says Brown. 'And when I say his life is over, i don't say I'm going to go kill him, but l'm going to ruin his life and look into his fucking kids, How do you like them apples?" It takes a suspension of disbelief to hear a credible physical threat as defined by law. The rail-thin Brown appears a desperate, pathetic character in need of psychiatric help. A more humane FBI office might have sent a doctor rather than a car of armed agents. But the FBI didn't send a shrink. That evening a team of armed agents stormed Brown's apartment, threw him violently to the ground and arrested him for threatening a federal officer. Releases 'Beat the Blockade' Benefit CD Over the next four months, federal grand juries issued three multicount indictments for obstruction and "access devieefraue related to the l i n k . It is the last of these that concern civil-liberties activists and that could have a possible chilling effect. "One can't apply the transfer provision of the statute to someone conducting research," says " I f cutting and pasting a link is the same as the transfer of the underlying data, then anyone on the Internet is prone to violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act." The FBI has shown interest in expanding that theoretical "anyone' to include Brown's circle of volunteers. In March, the bureau went hunting for the digital fingerprints of Project PM administ-ators with a subpoena. The action has shaken the group's inner circle, as it was surely intended. ' It was a pretext to sow discord and fear in Barrett's project," says a U.K. investigator for Project PM. "They were desperate to bolster their case. After the subpoena, people began to worry about being monitored. i worry about my personal safety even though I acted within the confines of the law. I worry about travel." Travel is one thing Brown does not have to worry about at the moment. Nor, if the government gets its way, will he have to worry about handling the media, his former specialty. In August, the prosecution requested a gag be placed on Brown and his lawyers, a move that suggests they understand the dangers of public scrutiny of the legal peculiarities of United States vs. Barrett Lancaster Brown. Meanwhile, Brown has not joined the prison tradition of mastering the law behind bars. Bather than study up on cyberfraud statutes, he has resumed his writing on intel contractors and the pundits who defend them. "Nobody talks to me here," Brown says of his year in jail, "but I was pretty unsociable on the outside too." One of the harcest things about incarceration for the atheist has been contending with his cellmates' singing of hymns. 'Prison is great for reading and for thought, until they start in with their Pentecostal nonsense," says Brown. 'It ruins everything." His friends keep him supplied with articles and printouts, which lately have included material related to the l e a k . g a i n e d access to information about secret NSA spying on private citizens while working for the intelligence subcontractorr 1 1 . a company that had been on Brown's radar long before most Americans learned ofit in the wake ofl j b o m b s h e l l s . ;••••:1 - r „ , " ' *4- BOP 2016-03828 21 of 175 "This is all much bigger than me," Brown says in the visiting room. "What matters is this." He leans over to tap his handwritten manuscript. The pages of the essay are messy on the table, and sticking out from under the pile is the last sentence on the last page, This is the world that we accept if we continue to avert our eyes," it says. A n d it promises to get much worse." This story is from the August 29th, 2013 issue of Rolling Stone. Read more: http://www.rollingstone.comicultureinews/barrett-brown-faces-105-years-in-iail20130905#ixzz3YWhnGBCO Follow us: prollingstone on Twitter I RollingStone on Facebook BOP 2016-03828 22 of 175 Page 023 of 175 VVithheld pursuant to exemption io)(7)(Cmb)(7)IF) of the Freedom of information and Privacy Act Page 024 of 175 -'1i1thheld pursuant to exemption b)(7)(C),(b)(7)iF) of t r e Freedom of rtfirtm-lation and Privacy Act Page 025 of 175 Withheld pursuant to exemption of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act Page 026 of 175 vklithileid pursuant tc exemption i.t7VC),(b)(7)i,i7i o4 the Freedom of Information and r i i i a c y Act l'age 027 of 175 t t h e i d pursuant to exemption ib)(7)(C).(b)(7)(Ei of the Freedom of information and Privacy Act Page 028 of 175 Withheld pursuant to exemption fb)(7)(C).(1))(7)(Fi of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act Page 029 o f 175 ':Vitnheid pursuant to exemption a)(7)(C),(0)(7)(F-of me Freedom of information ana Privacy Act Page 030 of 175 Withheld pursuant to exemption of me Freedom of Information and anacy Act Page 031 of 175 Vliltnheld pursuant to exemption lo47'gC),(b)(7)(fi c,• The Freedom of information and Privacy Act Page 032 of 175 •ii•-.,:nt-eld pursuant to exemption ;b,:7ACi.(b)f7)(7= :,:he Freedom of Information and Prkiacy Act Page 033 of 175 Withhew pursuant to exemption of the Freedom 01 Informauon and anacy Act Page 934 of 175 VVitnheld pursuant to exemption (7)(C),(b)(7?IFI of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act Page 035 of 175 Withheld pursuant to exemption ib)(7)(C)•tb)(7)(F) of the Freedom of information and Privacy Act Page 036 of 175 niitnheld pursuant to exemption ,b)(7)(C) (b)(7)(F1 cfn e Freedom of information and Privacy Act Page 037 o f 175 vVitnnelO pursuant to exemption ibi(7iC).(b)(711.1 of the Freedom of information and Privacy AV rage 038 of 175 ivitnneld pursuant to exemption 7)(c),(b)(7)rFt of the Freedom of :nforrnation and Pnvacy Act Page 039 of 175 Withheio pursuant to exemption 0:0(7)(F) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act agie 040 of 175 1-Theici pursuant to exemption ID)(7F) of tne Freectom of information and privacy Act Page 041 of 175 pursuant to exemption of the Freedom of Informanon and Prwacy Act Page D42 of 175 vvitnneid pursuant to exemption (b)(7)(F) ol the Freedom of information and Privacy Act U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons South Central Regional Office G r a n d Prairie, Texas 75051 April 30, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR RODNEY W. CHANDLER, WARDEN FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL I N S T I T U T I O N FORT WORTH /s/ J. A . X e l l e r FROM: Regional D i r e c t o r SUBJECT: C I M C L A S S I F I C AT I O N O F : BROWN, B a r r e t t L a n c a s t e Reg. N o . 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 In a c c o r d a n c e w i t h Program S t a t e m e n t 5 1 8 0 . 0 4 , C e n t r a l I n m a t e M o n i t o r i n c Manual, t h e above-named i n m a t e ' s CIM c l a s s i f i c a t i o n has b e e n r e v i e w e d a n d t h e f o l l o w i n g a c t i o n d e t e r m i n e d t o b e appropriate. XX C L A S S I F I C A T I O N - - - ASS1GNMENT(S): Threats t o Government O f f i c i a l s Broad P u b l i c i t y DECLASSIFICATION - - - - ASSIGNMENT(S) OTHER/NOTE: SENSITIVE B U T UNCLASSIFIED BOP 2016-03828 43 of 175 ,1•1••N U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Fort Worth, Texas 76119-5996 Federal Correctional Institution April 10, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR J. A. KE _ER, REGIONAL DIRECTOR S) T E N T R E G I O N FROM: A1TN: • 4 1 v W. C Warden idler a Tonya Wilson Central Inmate Monitoring Coordinator SUBJECT: C e n t r a l Inmate Monitoring Assignment Re: BROWN, Barrett Lancaste Reg. No. 45047-177 Please find attached the BP-339, BF-340, and documentation on inmate Barrett Brown for your review. S t a ff have reviewed this information and recommend thc inmate he classified as a Central Inmate Monitoring (CIM) case with the assignment of Broad Publicity due to his extensive media coverage related to his extensive ties to various criminal computer intrusions against the government. H e also has a CIM assignment of Threats to Government Officials due to him threatening to harm and kill government officials. If more information is needed, please advise. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. FOi BOP 2016-03828 44 of 175 Pt 3F-S381.058 I N M A T E A C T I V I A g ; RECORD CDFRM MAY 9 4 U . S . D E PA R T M E N T O F J- -U S T I C E ' NA/.:E, i f 7-R E 3 1 1 8 0 ,NQmR Date Issue DERA1 B U R E A U O F P R I S O N S < i n i z a m m o INSTITUTION Initials 8_, ---24-1.c ACTION / --, f7---e.,) / 9r? S t a f f Member if-trkft--JZ Date Issue Initials ACONi„:124-4-4-4-60 g o S t a f f Members 5_ etz_c_Ae_ S t a f f Members 4 1 1 0 D eat I I s s u e s•evA- /LT,-(Le_ccLoA,J Date Issue S t a f f Members I n i t a l s g_ 1-/-365-7_C ACTION Date Issue Initials Issue Initials S t a f f Members ACTION Date S t a f f Members t a f f Members ACTION Date Issue Initials S ACT:ON BOP 2016-03828 45 of 175 TRVBQ 5 3 5 * O B * PAGE 0 0 2 O F 0 0 2 * 10-20-2015 09:42:55 F E D E R A L BUREAU O F PRISONS C I M CLEARANCE AND SEPARATEE D ATA REGISTER N O : 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 NAME: BROWN REGISTER NUMBER L A S T NAME FIRST NAME ARS A R S FCL A S S I G N ARS DATE ARS Q T R TIME A S S I G N BARRETT T R V A - D E S 1 0 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 5 1 3 3 0 K 0 2 - 2 0 2 U 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 BROWN CMC ASSGNS: BROAD PUB,THREAT GOV 02 REMARKS: 9 / 2 7 / 1 2 OMDT/SVM DSG FTW DCU FOR C RT ORD 4 2 4 1 3 P S Y S T U D Y. 02 REMARKS: 2 / 1 7 / 1 5 D S C / C C D E S I G FTW G P. 02 REMARKS: 9 / 2 2 / 1 5 D S C / A H S / R L S A P V 3 C 7 T R F F M FTW G P T O T R V, FOI EXEMPT P0021 T H I S I N M AT E HAS N C SEPARATEES FOI EXEMPT BOP 2016-03828 46 of 175 Page 047 o! 175 W?hheld putsuam Io exempllon o! the Freedom 0! Intonnauon and Privacy Act Page 048 at 175 Withheld pursuant Io exemption of the Freedom 0! Informauon and anacy Acl Case: 3:12-cr-00317, Document: 147, Filed: 01-28-2015, Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS D A L L A S DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA J U D G M E N T IN A CRIMINAL CASE V. Case Numbers: 3:12-CR-00317-1(1) 3:12-CR-00413-L (I) BARRETT LANCASTER BROWN USM Number: 45047-177 Ahmed Chappour, Mario P. Cadeddu, and Charles Swift Detendant•s Attorney THE DEFENDANT: pleaded guilty to count(s) pleaded guilty to count(s) before a U S. Magistrate Judge, which was accepted by the court. Count I of the Indictment filed 10/312012—3:12-C1R-317-L4 Counts I and 2 of the Superseding Information filed 3/31/2014 3 : 1 2 CR-113-L. pleaded nob o contendere to count( s) which was accepted by the court was found guilty on count(s) after a plea of not gii ilty The defendant is adjudicated guilty of these offenses: Title & Section I Nature of Offense 3:12-CR-317-L. 9 / 1 8 875(e) ]nit:triet Threats O f 2 f . e 1 n 2 s 0 1 e 2 Ended C o u n t I 3:12-(R-413-1 18,3 (18 1030(a)(5)(13) and (c)(4)(A)(i)(1) Accessory' After The Fact to an Unauthorized Access to a 0 3 / 0 1 t 2 0 1 2 Protected Computer 1815111 and 2 Obstructing The Execution of a Search Warrant and Atding and Abetting 0 3 / 0 6 1 2 0 1 2 The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 8 of this .judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. Count(s) remaining counts of Indictment tiled 10/2/2012 (3:12-CR-317-L); remaining counts of Indictment tiled 12/4/2012, and Superseding Indictment tiled 7/2/2013 (3: 12-CR-413-L); and Original Indictment in case 3:13-CR-030-L El i s 1Z1 are dismissed on the motion of the United States It is ordered that the defendant must notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name. residence, or mailing address until all tines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid. I f ordered to pay restitution, the defendant mist notify the court and United States attorney of material changes in economic circumstances. U.S. DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS January 22,2015 Date of Impcsillon of Judgment FILED JAN 2 8 2015 SAM A..LINDSAY, UNITED STATES DJSTRICT JUDGE CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT BY Name and Title olJudge January 21,2015 Deputy BOP 2016-03828 49 of 175 Case: 3:12-cr-00317, Document: 147, Filed: 01-28-2015, P a g e 2 of 8 AO 245B (Rev T X N 10112) Judgment in a Criminal Case J u d g m e n t -- Page 2 of 8 DEFENDANT: B A R R E T T LANCASTER BROWN CASE NUMBER: 3 : 12-CR-00317-LM 3:12-CR-00413-L(I) IMPRISONMENT Pursuant in the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. but taking the Guidelines as advisory pursuant to United States s• Booker, and considering the factors set forth in IS U.S.C. Section 3553(a), the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term of: F o r t y - e i g h t (48) months as to Count 1 in Case No. 3:12-CR-317-L; and twelve (12) months as to Count 1, and three (3) months as to Count 2 in Case No. 3:12-C14413-L. The terms as to all counts shall run consecutively, for a total sentence of sixty-three (63) months. The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: The court recommends that Defendant be allowed to serve his sentence at FCI, Fort Worth and that he be allowed to participate in the Residential Drug Abuse Treatment Program, if he is eligible. The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal, The defendant shall surrender to the United Slates Marshal for this district: ▪ at • a s notified by the United States Marshal. D a.m. D p.m. o n The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons: E b e f o r e 2 p.m. on EI a s notified by the United States Marshal. • a s notified by the Probation or Pretria: Services Office. RETURN I have executed this judement as follows: Defendant delivered on at , t o with a certified copy o f this Judgment UNITED STATES MARSHAL By DFPLITY UNITED STATES MARSHAL BOP 2016-03828 50 of 175 Case: 3:12-cr-00317, Document: 147, Filed: 01-28-2015, P a g e 3 of 8 AO 245B (Rev. TXN 10112) Judgment in a Criminal Case J u d g m e n t -- Page 3 of 8 DEFENDANT: B A R R E T T LANCASTER BROWN CASE NUMBER: 3 : 1 2 - C 7 R - 0 0 3 1 7 - LW 3:12-CR-00413-LW SUPERVISED RELEASE Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be on supervised release for a term of : Tw o (2) years as to Count I in Case No. 3:12-CR-317-L; and one (I) year as to Counts I and 2 in Case No. 3:12-C1i-413-L. The terms as to all counts shall run concurrently. The defendant must report to the probation office in the district *.o which the defendant is released within 72 hours of release from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons. The defendant shall not commit another federal, state or local crime. The defendant shall not unlawfully possess a controlled substance. The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, as determined by the court. O T h e above drug testing condition is suspended, based on the coon's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse. (Check, Vappikable ) 2) T h e defendant shall not possess a firearm, ammunition, destructive device, or any other dangerous weapon. (check, alappircahk.) 2:1 T h e defendant shall cooperate in the collection of DNA as directed by the probation officer. (cheek. y applicable.) E T h e defendant shall comply with the requirements of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (42 U.S.C. § 16901, et seq.) as directed by the probation officer, the Bureau of Prisons, or any state sex offender registration agency in which he or she resides, vk orks, is a student, or was convicted of a qualifying offense. (Cheek if applicable., ▪ T h e defendant shall participate in an approved program for domestic violence. (Check 4.a/1;1:cable ) If this judgment imposes a fine or restitution, ills a condition of supervised release that the defendant pay in accordance with the Schedule of Payments sheet of this judgment. The defendant must comply with the standard conditions that have been adopted by this court as well as with any additional conditions on the attached page. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISION the defendant shall not leave the Judicial district without the permission of the court or probation officer; 2. t h e defendant shall report to the probation officer in a manner and frequency directed by the court or probation officer; 3. t h e defendant shall answer truthfully all inquiries by the Probation OftiCC and follow the instructions of the probation officer; 4. t h e defendant shall support his or her dependents and meet other family responsibilities, 5 t h e defendant shall work regularly at a lawful occupation, unless excused by the probation officer for schooling, training, or other acceptable reasons; 6. t h e defendant shall notify' the probation officer at least ten days prior to any change in residence or employment; 7. t h e defendant shall refrain from excessive use of alcohol and shall not purchase, possess, use, distribute, or administer any controlled substance or any paraphernalia related to any controlled substances, except as prescribed by a physician; 8. t h e defendant shall not frequent places where controlled substances arc illegally sold, used, distributed, or administered, 9. t h e defendant shall not associate with any persons engaged in criminal activity and shall not associate with any person convicted of a felony, unless granted permission to do so by the probation officer: 10. t h e defendant shall permit a probation officer to visit hire or her at any time at home or elsewhere arid shall permit confiscation of any contraband observed in plain view of the probation officer; 11 t h e defendant shall notify the probation officer Mithin seventy-two hours of being arrested or questioned by a law enforcement officer; 17. the defendant shall not enter into any agreement to act as an informer or a special agent of a ley\ enforcement agency without the permission of the court, and 13. a s directed by the probation officer, the defendant shah notify third parties of risks that may be occasioned by the defendant's criminal record or personal history or characteristics and shall permit the probation officer to make such notifications and to confirm the defendant's compliance with such notification requirement. BOP 2016-03828 51 of 175 Case: 3:12-cr-00317, Document: 147, Filed: 01-28-2015, Page 4 of 8 AO 245B (Rev. TXN 10/12) Judgment in a Crimnal case J u d g m e n i -- Page 4 of 8 DEFENDANT: B A R R E T T LANCASTER BROWN CASE NUMBER: 3 : 12-CR-003 7-L( I) 3:12-CR-00413-L(1) SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISION Pursuant to the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996, the defendant is ordered to pay restitution in the amount of S890,250, payable to the U.S. District Clerk, 1100 Commerce Street, Room 1452, Dallas, Texas 75242. Restitution shall be payable immediately and any unpaid balance shall be payable during incarceration. If upon commencement o f the term o f supervised release any part o f the restitution remains unpaid, the defendant shall make payments on such unpaid balance in monthly installments of not less than 10 percent of the defendant's gross monthly income, or at a rate of not less than $50 per month, whichever is greater. Payment shall begin no later than 60 days after the defendant's release from confinement and shall continue each month thereafter until the balance is paid in full. In addition, at least 50 percent of the receipts received from gifts. tax returns, inheritances, bonuses, lawsuit awards, and any other receipt of money shall be paid toward the unpaid balance within 15 days o f receipt. This payment plan shall not affect the ability o f the United States to immediately collect payment in full through garnishment, the Treasury Offset Program, the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program, the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act o f 1990 or any other means available under federal or state law. Furthermore, it is ordered that interest on the unpaid balance is waived pursuant to 18 ILSE. § 3612(0(3). The defendant shall participate in a program (inpatient and/or outpatient) approved by the U.S. Probation Office for treatment of narcotic, drug. or alcohol dependency, which will include testing for the detection of substance use or abuse. The defendant shall abstain from the use of alcohol and/or all other intoxicants during and after completion of treatment. The defendant shall contribute to the costs of services rendered (copayment) at a rate of at least $50 per month. The defendant shall participate in mental health treatment services as directed by the probation officer until successfully discharged. These services may include medications prescribed by a licensed physician. The defendant shall contribute to the costs of services rendered (copayment) at a rate of at least $50 per month. The defendant shall not be employed by, affiliated with, own or control. or otherwise participate, directly or indirectly, in any business which involves access to credit information o f other persons. including but not limited to the handling of credit cards, bank checks, drafts, or other financial documents, without the probation officer's prior approval. The defendant shall participate and comply with the requirements of the Computer and Internet Monitoring Program, contributing to the cost of the monitoring in an amount not to exceed S40 per month, The defendant shall consent to the probation officer's conducting ongoing monitoring o f his computer/computers. The monitoring may include the installation of hardware and/or software systems that allow evaluation of computer use. The defendant shall not remove, tamper with. reverse engineer, or circumvent the software in any way. The defendant shall only use authorized computer systems that are compatible with the software and/or hardware used by the Computer and Internet Monitoring Program. The defendant shall permit the probation officer to conduct a preliminary computer search prior to the installation of software. At the discretion of the probation officer, the monitoring software may be disabled or removed at any time during the term of supervision. BOP 2016-03828 52 of 175 Case: 3:12-cr-00317, Document: 147, Filed: 01-28-2015, Page 5 of 8 AO 24511 (Rev T X N 10112) Judgment in a Criminal Case J u d g m e n t -- Page 5 of 8 DEFENDANT: B A R R E T T LANCASTER BROWN CASE NUMBER: 3 :12-CR-003 17-141) 3:12-CR-00413-L( I) The defendant shall submit to periodic, unannounced examinations o f his/her computer/computers, storage media, and/or other electronic or Internet-capable devices, performed by the probation officer at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner based on reasonable suspicion o f contraband evidence o f a violation o f supervision. T h i s may include the retrieval and copying of any prohibited data and/or the removal of such systems for the purpose o f conducting a more thorough inspection. T h e defendant shall provide written authorization for release of information from the defendant's Internet service provider. The defendant shall not use any computer other than the one the defendant is authorized to use, without prior approval from the probation officer. The defendant shall not use any software program or device designed to hide, alter, or delete records and/or logs of the defendant's computer use. Internet activities, or tiles stored on the defendant's computer. The defendant shall provide to the probation officer any requested financial information. DOP 2016-03828 53 of 175 Case: 3:12-cr-00317, Document: 147, Filed: 01-28-2015, Page 6 of 8 AO 245B (Rev. TXN 10/12) Judgment in a Criminal Case Judgment -- Page 6 of 8 DEFENDANT: B A R R E T T LANCASTER BROWN CASE NUMBER: 3 : 1 2 - C R - 0 0 3 1 7 - L ( 1 ) 3:12-CR-00413-1,(1) C R I M I N A L M O N E TA RY PENALTIES The defendant must E_Lav the total criminal moneta D P enaltles under the schedule of payments on Sheet 6. Assessment $225.00 TOTALS Fine $ 00 Restitution $890,250.00 E T h e determination of restitution is deferred until A n Amended Judgment in a Criminal Case (A0245C) will be entered after such determination. The defendant must make restitution (including community restitution) to the following payees in the amount listed below. li the defendant makes a partial payment, each payee shall recci%e an approximately proportioned payment However, pursuant to 18 3664(i), all nonfederal victims must be paid before the United Slates is paid. Restitution o f $890,250.00 to: Restitu:lon amount ordered pursuant to plea agreement $ The defendant must pay interest on restitution and a fine of more than $2,500, unless the restitution or tine is paid in full before the fifteenth day after the date of the judgment, pursuant to 18 C.S.C. 3612(f). A l l of the payment options on Sheet 6 may be subject to penalties for delinquency and default, pursuant to IS U.S.C. § 36I2(g). Z T h e court determined that the defendant does not have the ability to pay interest and it is ordered that: z t h e interest requirement is waived for the E t h e interes*, requirement for the E 0 fine restitution fine restitution is modified as follows: • Findings for the total amount of losses are required under Chapters 109A. 110. 110A. and I 13A of Title 18 for offenses committed on or after September 13. 1994. but before April 23, 1996 BOP 2016-03828 54 of 175 Case: 3:12-cr-00317, Document: 147, Filed: 01-28-2015, Page 7 of 8 AO 245B )Rev. I X N 10/12) Judgmern in a Criminal Case J u d g m e n t P a u 7 of 8 DEFENDANT: B A R R E T T LANCASTER BROWN CASE NUMBER: 3 : 12-CR-003 17-L(1) 3;12-CR-00413-1,(1) SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS Having assessed the defendant's ability to pay, payment of the total criminal monetary penalties is due as follows: A E L u m p sum payments of $ d not later than D i n accordance u , c , e or f l D , B P a y m e n t to begin immediately (may be combined with c P a y m e n t in equal ( e immediately, balance due E 0 , or C. E D F below; or . g„ weekly, monthly, quarterly) installments of S or o E v e F below); or r a period of (e.g., months or years), to commence ( e . g . , 30 or 60 days) after the date of this judgment, or D E ] Payment in equal monthly (e,g , weekly. monthly, quarterly) installments of S 50 to commence 60 days (e.g., 30 or 60 days) after release from imprisonment to a term of supervision; or E 0 Payment during the term of supervised release will commence within( e g . , 30 or 60 days) alter release from imprisonment. The court will set the payment plan based on an assessment of the defendant's ability to pay at that time; or F [ 2 3 Special instructions regarding the payment of criminal monetary penalties: It is ordered that the Defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $I 00 for Count I (3:12-01317-14. S I N for Count I (3:12-CR-41.34.), arid S25 for Count 2 (3:12-CR-413-1), f o r a total of $225, which shall be due immediately, Said special assessment shall be paid to the Clerk, U.S. District Court. Unless the court has expressly ordered otherwise, if this judgment imposes imprisonment, payment of criminal monetary penalties is due during imprisonment A l l criminal monetary penalties, except those payments made through the Federal Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program, are made to the clerk of the court. The defendant shall receive credit for all payments previously made toward any criminal monetary penalties imposed. D J o i n t and Several See above for Defendant and Co-Defendant Names and Case Numbers (including defendant number), Total Amount, Joint and Several Amount, and corresponding payee, if appropriate. Defendant shall receive credit on his restitution obligation for recovery from other defendants who contributed to the same loss that gave rise to defendant's restitution obligation. El T h e defendant shall pay the cost of prosecution. 0 T h e defendant shall pay the following court cost(s): El T h e defendant shall forfeit the defendant's interest in the following property to the United States: Payments shall be applied in the following order: ( I) assessment, (2) restitution principal, (3) restitution interest, (4) tine principal, (5) fine interest. (6) coninninitN restitution, (7) penalties, and (8) costs, including cos( of prosecution and court costs. BOP 2016-03828 55 of 175 Case: 3:12-cr-00317, Document: 147, Filed: 01-28-2015, Page 8 of 8 AD 245B (Rev. TXN 10/12) Judgment in a Criminal Case J u d g m e n t -- Page 8 of 8 DEFENDANT: B A R R E T T LANCASTER BROWN CASE NUMBER: 3 : 1 2 - C A - 0 0 3 1 7 - LW 3:12-CR-00413-1,(1) A D D I T I O N A L FORFEITED PROPERTY Contrary to the court's statement regarding forfeiture in open court on January 22, 2015, the items included in Attachment A of Defendant's Plea Agreement are not part of his sentence. BOP 2016-03828 56 of 175 Case: 3:12-cr-00317, Document: 148, Filed: 01-28-2015, Page 1 of 4 AC) 2458 (Rev. TXN 10/12) Crimmal Judgment—Alauhment —Statement of Reasons DEFENDANT: B A R R E T T LANCASTER BROWN CASE NUMBER: 3 : 1 2 - C R - 0 0 3 1 7 - L ( I ) and 3:12-CR-00413-L(I) DISTRICT: N o r t h e r n District of Texas - Dallas STATEMENT OF REASONS (Not for Public Disclosure) A e ,ir,..•ao • 5 1 COURT FINDINGS ON PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT A L T h e court adopts the presenterice investigation report without change. E T h e court adopts the presentence investigation report with the following changes. (Check all that apply and specify court determination. tindmgs, or comments, referencing paragraph numbers in the presentence report, if applicable) Rise page 4 &necessary ) 1 C h a p t e r Two of the U.S.S.G. Manual determinations by court (including changes to base offense level, or specific offense characterialcs): 2 C 0 Z C h a p t e r Three of the U.S.S.G. Manual determinations by court (including changes to victim-related adjustments, role in the offense, obstruction of justice, multiple counts, or acceptance of responsibility): The court overruled Defendant's objection to the grouping of Count I in Case No. 3:12-CR-3 I 7-L and Counts I and 2 m Case No. 3:12-CR413-L. 3 E C h a p t e r Four of the US.S.G. Manual determinations by court (including changes to criminal history category or scores, career offender, or criminal livelihood determinations): 4 D A d d i t i o n a l Comments or Findings (including comments or factual findings concerning certain information in the presentence report that the Federal Bureau of Prisons may rely on when it makes inmate classification, designation, or programming decisions): T h e record establishes no need for a presentence investigation report pursuant to Eed.R.Crim.P. 32. COURT FINDING ON MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCE A 2 N o count of conviction carries a mandatory minimum sentence. B M a n d a t o r y minimum sentence imposed. C D O n e or more counts of conviction alleged in the indictment carry a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment. but the sentence imposed is below a mandatory minimum term because the court has determined that the mandatory minimum does not apply based on findings of fact in this case • substantial assistance (18 U.S.C. § 3553(e)) E t h e statutory safety valve (18 U.S.C. § 3553(fi) ILL C O U R T DETERMINATION OF ADVISORY GUIDELINE RANGE (BEFORE DEPARTURES): _ Total Offense Level: 23 II Criminal History Category: 5110 63 months Imprisonment Range: Supervised Release Range: I t o 3 years (Ct. 1-3:12-CR-317-L.): 1 year (Cts 1 and 2-3:12-CR-413,1) $10.00 to $100,000.00 Fine Range Fine waived or below the guideline range because of inability to pay. - BOP 2016-03828 57 of 175 Case: 3:12-cr-00317, Document: 148, Filed: 01-28-2015, Page 2 of 4 AD 24513 (Rev T X N 10/1 2) Criminal Judgment - Attachment - Statement of Reasons DEFENDANT: B A R R E T T LAN CASTER BROWN CASE NUMBER: 3 : 1 2 - C R - 0 0 3 1 7 - L ( 1 ) and 3:12-CR-00413-1.4 I DISTRICT: N o r t h e r n District o f Texas - Dallas STATEMENT OF REASONS (Not for Public Disclosure) IV. A M ISORY GUIDELINE SENTENCING DETERMINATION (check only 'me.) A 2 ) T h e sentence is within an advisory guideline range that is not greater than 24 months, and the court finds no reason to depart The sentence is within an Advisor:, guideline range that is greater than 21 months. and the specific sentence it imposed fur these reasons. (the nage 4 tirte-essary,1 The court departs from the advisory guideline range for reasons authorized by (Inc sentencing guidelines manual. t,•(iso cotnplete Section V) D El The court imposed a sentence outside the advisory sentencing guideline system. (Also iorttplete Set hon 17) V. D E P A R T U R E S AUTHORIZED BY THE ADVISORY SENTF.NClNc e.(tll)F1IiNI' iIirnoI,•,il,i,, 0 B J0 T h e sentence imposed departs (Check only one.): 0 below the advisory guideline range 0 above the advisory guideline range D e p a r t u r e based on (Check all that apply): -7-1--- Plea Agreement (Check all that apply and check reason(s) below.): 0 5K I I plea agreement based on the defendant's substantial assistance 0 5K3 I plea agreement based on Early Disposition or "Fast-track- Program binding plea agreement for departure accepted by the court plea agreement for departure, which the court finds to be reasonable 0 D 0 plea agreement that states that thc government will not oppose a defense departure motion r h t ot in n Not Addressed in a Plea Agreement 'Check all that apply atui check reason(s) •ttlow): 11 SKI I government motion based on the defendant's substantial assistance CI 510. I government motion based on Early Disposition or "Fast-track" program govern mem motion for departure 0 - _ tiler defense motion for departure to which the government did not object defense motion for departure to which the government objected 0 O t h e r than a plea agreement or motion h) the parties for departure (Check reason(s) below IC D D D 4A I .3 0 51-1I.3 0 El 0 5H1.4 5H11.5 5111.6 1=i 5H1 I I L.' 90.0 5111 1 5H1 2 Reason(s) for Departure (Check Criminal History Inadequacy El Age 0 Education and Vocational 0 Skills Mental and Emotional 0 Condition Physical Condition Li Employment Record El Family Ties and El all dun' op ily other that: 51c ), I or 5K3.1 ) 5K2. I 5K2.2 5K'2,3 El 0 CI 5K2.I I Lesser Harm Pbvsical Injury Extreme Psychological Injury 51(2 12 Coercion and Duress 5K2 I 3 Diminished Capacity 51(2,4 Abduction Or Unlawful Restraint D SKI 11 Public Welfare 5K2.5 5K2.6 5K2.7 Property Damage or Loss Weapon or Dangerous Weapon Disruption of Uovernment Function El El El 51(2.16 51(2 17 51(2 Its Voluntary Disclosure of Offense Extreme Conduct El 51(2,20 Aberrant Behavior 0 51(2.21 Dismissed and Uncharged Conduct Death Responsibilities Military Record, Charitable Service. Good Works 0 5K2,S Aggravating or Mitigating Circumstances 0 5K2 9 Criminal Purpose 0 5K2 10 Victim's Conduct _ I Explain the facts justifying the denarture. ( t Ise °age 4 Al necessors. ss i BOP 2016-03828 58 of 175 High-Capacity. Semiautomatic Weapon Virulent Street Gang 0 5K2 22 Age or Health of Sot Offenders 0 5K2,23 Discharged Terms of Imprisonment 0 Other guideline basis te.g. 28 i .1 commentary) Case: 3:12-cr-00317, Document: 148, Filed: 01-28-2015, Page 3 of 4 A O 21.5B (Rev T X N 10/12) Criminal Judgmcnt — Attachment — Statement o f Reasol:s DEFENDANT: B A R R E T T LANCASTER BROWN CASE NUMBER: 3 : 1 2 - C R - 0 0 3 1 7 - L ( I) and 3:12-CR-00413-L(1) DISTRICT: N o r t h e r n District of Texas - Dallas S TAT E M E N T OF REASONS (Not for Public Disclosure) VI. C O U R T DETERMINATION FOR SENTENCE OUTSIDE THE ADVISORY GUIDELINE SYSTEM (ChecA all that apply.) 1 A The sentence imposed is (Check only one.): below the advisory guideline range Li 13 above the advisory guideline range Sentence imposed pursuant to 'Check all that apply.): Plea Agreement (Owck all that app4 and check teasant'st below. t: binding plea agreement for a sentence outside the advisiny guideline system accepted by the court plea agreement for a Sentence outside the advisory guideline system. which the court finds to be reasonable plea agreement that states that the government will nor oppose a defense motion to the court to sentenee outside the advisory guideline system 2 t Motion Not Addressed in a Plea Agreement (Check all that apply and eneck reason(s) 1,elow): E l g o v e r n m e n t motion rot a sentence outside of the advisory guideline system defense motion for a sentence outside of the ads 'wiry guideline system to which the government did not object defense motion for a sentence outside of the advisory guideline system to which the government objected 13 O t h e r Other than a plea agreement or motion by the parties for a sentence outside of the advisory guideline ss stem (Check reasonts) below Li Li defense motien for a sentence outside of the advisory guideline system to which the government did not object deiense Motion for a sentence outside of a d v i s o r s guideline system to which the government objected C Reason(s) for Sentence Outside the Advisory Guideline SLstem (Check all that apply) 0 the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant pursuant to 18 U.S C. § 3553(0(1) 1 E o E E • tc tctleci the seriousness of the offense. to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense (18 U.S.C. * 35511a)(2,AAYI to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct (18 U.S.0 § 3553(a)(20)l to pratect the public from further CrinleS of the defendant 1118 l..1 S C § 3553(a)(2)(C)) to provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational training, medical care, or other correcttonal treatment in the most effective manner (18 UiS.C. §3553tax2-i(Dll to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities among defendants (18 U S.C. §3553(a1(6)i to preside restitution to any victims of the offense (18 II S C. * 3553(a)(7)) Explain the facts justifying a sentence outside the advisory guideline system. (Ilse page 4 if necessary) BOP 2016-03828 59 of 175 Case: 3:12-cr-00317. Document: 148. Filed: 01-28-2015. Page 4 of 4 A0 2458 (Rev. IXN l0'l2t Judgment - Attachment - Statement of Reasons DEFENDANT: CASE NUMBER DISTRICT: VII. A Restitution i; Restitution 2 3 I 4 0 TI ADDITIONAL FACT I?Ite (?uurt ndoptt the [net ?ndings 04' the (?nnrt fuels set forth in the Presentenee Report nn) Addendum. extent to the extent modi?ed a Total Amount of Restitution: LANCASTER BROWN 3: I) and Northern Disnict of Texas - Dallu STATEMENT OF REASONS (Not for Pnblie Disclosure) COURT DETERMINATIONS 0F Not Applicable. $890,250.00 not ordered {but mtl?, one to: otTenses for which resutuuon is otnemm- mundqu under 18 .S 9 3603A. restrtuuou is not ordered because the number at tdentrt'ubte wet-ms rs so large as to make restitution under l8 3663Mcit1xA) for otTenses [or th'tteh IS othenime mandatory under fit 3th SA. :eslttuuoc is not ordered because complex issues of fact and relating them to the cause or amount of the Victims Iusres would or ptokmg the sentenernp process to a degree that the need to rde restztuttun to my warm would he outweighed :y the burden on the senteneng pzueen under I8 mutt-rum) For other otTenses [or ?tuft Ls authorized under II 3663 andor required by the , _ on" 0 :tra C.) T o =q , -0 • 0 E tot- •r. E , 9 7) E • 7.3 4 -o , ••-• N taza 0 -E c 0 t • CO t , m C E%.-.7,-7-, - 0 (:) c (-) n , e z - E 0 c•n 0 _.0 Ln _ , - - . -ca.•,!-„,,) 3 E- cr) c o ' a (2'.1Lt.! X •-— , 3 , : --c3 Ta •Li -0 uo -7 . 01 •4-8 _-_,F. - •'E' k-. L a•Z • .- C CC- )r m O L or I ' ccl : , - , v 10 - C 1..... I - u I r 0 , , 3 C75 - C In , u ..,:, O c .,.. 0 • - , .o- -0 0 , - - • , - 0 4) = c'0is. a 0 to -..0 .,,, 13 0 ...-, c c . -0 •- - u -0 0 C l - ...2 . 0 a S1-.7. c 0 Lea 0 •v'ti— oc4 C,.,a • = > ° O C I. -, 1 t oC._) t o t ) -0 o r 7 , )... E - o ,tol ,/, > c l - C 0 • - • > C --M . 1, a0a LI-3 0 r•-• 0 - ' 0 • ,- v ) t V. . - 15 0 -1:1E t...•,---13'4.-,-''--':' L, e t C r -,0 0 u to • ;-; .... t u 2 •.:-_-, ,••t) -5. c V c — 7.) o C • L a t o TS " . 0 0 -.d c I D L13 0 . = 0 .0 E ✓ 0 5 - r f l . ,tli 4-' ,-,r! c 4 — c , o = v I , L..' 0 . _; el) az u n , ,,,3 .-•1 0 co - o - 1 v 7 6 - c -cl 1 v) _ _ _ c —_, v _c av... v v Ci) ) _ . ' = v -5 0 a-, ,„ 0 el u E ._,Irl 0 : E ti") o u as • — o c _ 0 .-_ r - 3._ r - • , 0 c 4- - 6, C ' - ' ...i. E cV) ,_ • C- - - 0- Ln .., 0 0 c o - - , 0 1-„,- 0 4•_ - ttl r • , —0 5 -.7,•-'7:'-'3 _a 0-E; 5,) , ,_._.,<-) L - •=:, 0 - _ E-- .'_•'. c M - , , , , l a . 0 ''IZ 0 BOP 2016-03828 137 of 175 — BOP 2016-03828 138 of 175 REVISED HAZARD COMMUNICATION STANDARD -- INMATE TRAINING FORM OSHA revised its Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) to align with, the United Nations? Globally Harmonized System 'Of Classi?cation and Labeling of Chemicals and published it in the Federal Register in March 2012 (77 FR l7574). Two signi?cant changes contained in the revised standard require the use of new labeling elements and a standardized format for Safety Data Sheets (SDSs), formerly known as, Material Safety Data Sheets The new label elements and SDS requirements will improve worker understanding of the hazards associated with the chemicals in their workplace. To help companies comply with the revised standard, OSHA is phasing in the specific requirements over several years (December 1, 2013 to June 1, 2016). The Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (29 CFR revised in 2012, requires that the chemical manufacturer, distributor, or importer provide Safety Data Sheets (8055) (formerly or Material Safety Data Sheets) for each hazardous chemical to users to communicate information on these hazards. The information contained in the SDS is largely the same as the MSDS, except now the 8085 are required to be presented in a c0nsistent user- friendly, 16?section format. Sections 1 through 8 contain general information about the chemical, identi?cation, hazards, composition, safe handling practices, and emergency control measures ?re?ghting). This information should be helpful to those that need to get the information quickly. Sections 9 through ll and 16 contain other technical and scientific information, ~such as physical and chemical properties, stability and reactivity information, toxicological information, exposure control information, and other information including the date of preparation or last revision. The SDS must also state that no applicable information was found when the preparer does not find relevant information for any required element. As crime 1, 20l5, the l-lCS will require new $085 to be in a uniform format, and include the section numbers, the headings, and associated information under the headings below: Section 1, Identi?cation includes product identifier; manufacturer or distributor name, address, phone number; emergency phone number; use; restrictions on use. Section 9, Physical and chemical properties: lists the chemical?s characteristics. Section 10, Stability and reactivity: lists chemical stability and possibility of haZardous reactions. Sudan 2, Hazard(s) identification: includes all hazards regarding the chemical; required label elements. Section 3, Composition/information on ingredients: includes information on chemical ingredients; trade secret claims. Section 4, First?aid measures: includes important acute, delayed; required treatment. . Section 5, Fire-lighting measures: lists suitable extinguishing techniques. equipment; chemical hazards ??om fire. Section 6. Accidental release measures: lists emergency procedures; protective equipment; proper methods of containment and cleanup. Section 7, Handling and storage: lists precautions for safe handling and storage. including _inc0mpatibilities. Section 8, Exposure controls/personal protection: lists OSHA's Permissible Exposure Limits Threshold Limit Values appr0prialc engineering controls; personal protective equipment (PPE). Section 11, Toxicological information: includes routes of exposure; related acute and chronic effects; numerical measures of toxicity. Section 12, Ecological information? Section 13, Disposal considerations? Section 14, Transport information" Section 15, Regulatory infonnation" Section 16, Other information, includes the date of preparation or last revision. ?Note: Since other Agencies regulate this information, OSHA will not be enforcing Sections I2 through [5 (29 CFR 1910. 1200(g)(2)). Agee Amok Bp-A0597 U . S . JUN 10 F E D E R A U N I T A D M I S S I O N A N D O R I E N TAT I O N PROGRAM C H E C K L I S T Tnmate's t a m o Register No. Brown, B a r r e t t L a n c e s to DEPARTMENT O F J U S T I C E BUREAU O F P R I S O N S L I n ! “ t _ A t L',) 45047-177 F. C . I . T h r e e R i v e r s Unit Officer(s) : Discussion o f topics i s t o be completed no l a t e r than on the day the inmate arrives in t h e u n i t : T h e U n i t O f f i c e r w i l l s i g n and date t h i s form i n t h e appropriate section(s) f o r each applicable housing unit. Counts/Accountability/Searches/Pass System/Controlled Movement/Clothing and I . , u n d r y k e - u p . , : i c h t s Oi:t/71.1 P o l i c y / F i r e E s c a p e P r o c e d u r e s / U n i t •_ " _ _ • . Dr. .• : - -..:..; F u l e s I n d i c a t e D AT E ( s ) i n m a t e a r r i v e d i n ALL a p p l i c a b l e u n i t ( s ) Assigned U n i t KARNES A A&O U n i t KARNES A Unit Officer Signe Date O v e r v i e w r e Completed / /e--------717 Te m p o r a r y U n i t U n i t Management S t a f f : D i s c u s s i o n s o f t o p i c s a r e t o b e c o m p l e t e d w i t h i n 7 c a l e n d a r d a y s a f t e r t h e inmate's a r r i v a l i n t h e assigned u n i t . U n i t s t a f f w i l l s i g n and d a t e t h i s f o r m upon completion of t h e i r s e c t i o n . T h e inmate w i l l s i g n and date t h i s f o r m upon completion o f a l l s e c t i o n s . U S a n i t a t . . , : . ' , . r i t y / S a f e t y N R i g h t s and Responsibilities I U n i t Organization and Staff Roles, I S t a f f : , , , . .,,,.•::,lt D. M O L I N A / i 1 i g n e d 0 / 0 t - , - - - Unit 1 / 2 0 1 5 / 2 0 1 5 0 1 5 Responsibility comments; M G R -----=!:S...___ C a s s l f i c a t I o n / R e v i e w s - U n i t Te a m A S e n t e n c e Data and Detainers S C u s t o d y / S e c u r i t y Level !Z M G R P r o g r a m s - EO/VT/ UNICOR/DAP/Recreatio- law L i b r a r y i A d m i n i s t r a t I v e Remed. • -ase Preparation - _____ - - - - - - - - • • • C U N S E L U n i t l A e S i g n e d ( 1 0 / 0 U n i t 1 1 -. ?- - - - - - comments: - - - - - - - Pers _ A p p e a r a n c e / P e r s o n a l P r o p e r t y C nseling/Problem Solving .edical Services/Religious Services Commissary/Withdrawal o f Funds/FRP Mail R e g u l a t i o n s ( S p e c i a l a n d General) Work A s s i g n m e n t s / P e r f o r m a n cce e Pay V i s i t i n g a n d Te l e p h o n e P r i v i l e g e s 0 0 R Signa7 , r, . . . - C. F R E N C H / Signature/Datc (Assigned Unit) O. M O R I N / 1 0 / 0 1 / 2 - J L- B u l l e t i n Board/Change Sheet c,mments: - - - - I have been o r i e n t e d i n a l l o f t h e a p p l i c a b l e areas l i s t e d above and have had t r i discuss same w i t h u n i t s t a f f . Inmate' i g n a t u r e c c p n i t y to Cate S i g n e d 10/01/2015 LT i s ! o r e n a y b e r e p r o e u c r d e t a WPI Replacer e i r - c S o r d . t , 4 J u t C. F I L E I N S E C T I O N 3 U N L E S S A P P R O P R I AT E F O R P R I V A C Y F O L D E R POP Prescnbed by P5290 BOP 2016-03828 139 of 175 , . r a l FLI.• SECTION 3 TRVGF 5 3 5 * 0 8 * PAGE 0 0 1 • NAME • REGISTER N O : RACE / S E X . : RESIDENCE..: r . J E R A L BUREAU O F PRISONS I N T A K E SCREENING FORM BROWN, BARRETT LANCASTE 45047-177 WHITE / M A L E DALLAS, T X 7 5 2 0 9 I N M A T E 10-01-2015 13:44:03 UNIT DOB ( A G E ) : 0 8 - 1 4 - 1 9 8 1 ( 3 4 ) E T H N I C . . . : OTHER THAN H I S P RSP O F . . . : T R V A - D E S I N T E R V I E W DATE & & T I M E A R R I V E D : 1 0 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 5 1 3 : 3 0 _2srt° TIME INTERVIEWED: 1) D O YOU KNOW O F A N Y REASON T H AT YOU SHOULD NOT B E PLACED I N GENERAL POPULATION ? YES 2) H A V E YOU ASSISTED LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENTS I N A N Y WAY ? Y E S N O N O 3) ARE YOU A C I M CASE ? YES V 1 4) HAVE YOU T E S T I F I E D A G A I N S T ANYONE I N COURT ? YES N O 5) ARE YOU A MEMBER/ASSOCIATE O F A N Y GANG ? YES N O 6A) HAVE YOU EVER BEEN SEXUALLY ASSAULTED ? S YES N N O O 68) H AV E YOU RECENTLY BEEN SEXUALLY ASSAULTED INTERVIEWER COMMENTS: gc ie l l * A 4 ) Y E e t i / A 4 A - - - 1,0/7 r z . , it/L-4--- CIRCLE ON HAVE NOT R E C E I V E D A BUREAU O F PRISON " A D M I S S I O N S & & ORIENTATION BOOKLET* D E F I N I N G MY " R I G H T S & & R E S P O N S I B I L I T I E S " A N D THE " P R O H I B I T E D A S A N D D I S C I P L I N A R Y S E V E R I T Y S C A L E " . INMATE SIGNATURE: D AT E : \ ° - INTERVIEWER: DATE: 1 0 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 5 TITLE: S T A F F \--\5 C H E C K L I S T PSI REVIEWED • YES \ / ' NO CENTRAL F I L E REVIEWED • Y E S ve7 N O IS THERE A HISTORY O F SEXUALLY AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR? Y E S COMMENTS: N O V / I F GENERAL P H Y S I C A L APPEARANCE I S NOT GOOD, E X P L A I N : PSYCH A L E RT ( Y E S / N O ) ( OK FOR GENERAL POPULATION: Y E S I L."NO F ( I Y E S , D O NOT RELEASE T O GENERAL POPULATION, N O T I F Y PSYCHOLOGY) F NO, E X P L A I N ) BOP 2016-03828 140 of 175 OKLHF 5 3 5 * 0 8 PAGE 1 0 1 NAME • REGISTER N O : RACE / S E X . : RESIDENCE..: * F E D E R A L BUREAU O F PRISONS I N TA K E S C R E E N I N G F O R M UNIT DOB ( A G E ) : 0 8 - 1 4 - 1 9 8 1 ( 3 4 ) E T H N I C . . . : OTHER THAN H I S ? RSP O F . . . : F T W A - D E S BROWN, B A R R E T T LANCASTE 45047-177 WHITE / MALE DALLAS, T X 75209 I N M A T E DATE & & T I M E A R R I V E D : 0 9 - 2 5 - 2 0 1 5 09-25-2015 00:36:21 I N T E R V I E W 1 1 : 0 0 T I M E INTERVIEWED: 1) D O Y O U KNOW O F A N Y R E A S O N T H A T Y O U S H O U L D N O T B E PLACED I N G E N E R A L P O P U L AT I O N ? N O 2 ) H A V E Y O U A S S I S T E D L A W ENFORCEMENT A G E N T S I N A N Y W AY ? Y E S N O 3) A R E Y O U A C I M C A S E ? YES N O 4) H A V E Y O U T E S T I F I E D A G A I N S T ANYONE I N COURT ? YES N O S N O S N O N O 5) A R E Y O U A M E M B E R / A S S O C I AT E O F A N Y G A N G ? YES Y 6 A ) H A V E Y O U E V E R B E E N S E X U A L LY A S S A U LT E D ? E Y E •••••-' __,),......,•••--6 B ) H A V E Y O U R E C E N T LY B E E N S E X U A L LY A S S A U LT E D ? I N T E RV I E W E R C O M M E N T S : Y E ,, v 7 7 111 S ( NorAioPPARENTpRE/1 CIRCL' e N E : L i n HAVE H A V E N O T R E C E I V E D A B U R E A U O F P R I S O N " A D M I S S I O N S & & OR E N T A T O N B O O K L E T " D E F I N I N G M Y " R I G H T S & & R E S P O N S I B I L I T I E S " A N D THE " P H I B I T E D A C T S AND D I S C I P L I N A R Y S E V E R I T Y S C A L E " . S e p I N M AT E S I G N A D A T INTERVIEWER: TITLE: CSO S T A F F PSI REVIEWED E Y E S D ('112/5 : A T M E : 09-25-2015 C H E C K L I S T N O CENTRAL F I L E R E V I E W E D • Y E S N O ---7•••---ats, I S T H E R E A H I S T O R Y O F S E X U A L LY A G G R E S S I V E B E H A / V t P u b Y E S COMMENTS: 1 T N O •••••----. 1.164111/S I F GENERAL P H Y S I C A L APPEARANCE I S N O T GOOD, E X P L A I N : PSYCH A L E R T ( Y E S / N O ) • N O OK F O R G E N E R A L P O P U L AT I O N : Y E S ( N I O F ( I &7•3 d 4 9 tA1 Y E S , D O N O T RELEASE T O GENERAL P O P U L AT I O N , N O T I F Y P S Y C H O L O G Y ) F NO, E X P L A I N ) BOP 2016-03828 141 of 175 ITER/A E T FTWEN 5 3 5 * 0 8 PAGE 0 0 1 NAME • REGISTER N O : RACE / S E X . : RESIDENCE..: • FEDERAL B U R E A U O F P R I S O N S I N TA K E S C R E E N I N G F O R M BROWN, B A R R E T T L A N C A S T E 45047-177 D WHITE I M A L E E DALLAS, T X 7 5 2 0 5 U N O T H R I N M A T E N I B C I S T . 02-25-2015 11 : 3 1 : 3 1 C • 7 141, f \ J (AGE): 0 8 - 1 4 - 1 9 8 1 ( 3 3 ) . : OTHER THAN H I S P O F. . . : FTW A-DES . P I N T E R V I E W D AT E & & T I M E A R R I V E D : a - N E ( 5 TIME INTERVIEWED: 4 9 1 - 5 1) D O Y O U K N O W O F A N Y R E A S O N T H A T Y O U S H O U L D N O T B E PLACED I N G E N E R A L P O P U L AT I O N ? N O 2 ) H A V E Y O U A S S I S T E D L A W E N F O R C E M E N T A G E N T S I N A N Y W AY ? Y E S N O 3) A R E Y O U A C I M C A S E ? YES N O 4) H A V E Y O U T E S T I F I E D A G A I N S T ANYONE I N COURT ? YES N O 5) A R E Y O U A M E M B E R / A S S O C I AT E O F A N Y G A N G ? YES N O 6 A ) H A V E Y O U E V E R B E E N S E X U A L LY A S S A U LT E D ? YES N O 6 B ) H A V E Y O U R E C E N T LY B E E N S E X U A L LY A S S A U LT E D ? YES N O INTERVIEWER COMMENTS: P i ) ' Y e n f e C t . E A Q ) 7 S P// / / / A42/ CIRCLE ON HAVE N O T R E C E I V E D A B U R E A U O F P R I S O N " A D M I S S I O N S & & OR T I O N B O O K L E T * D E F I N I N G M Y " R I G H T S & & R E S P O N S I B I L I T I E S ° A N D THE " P R O H I B I T E D A C T S A N D D I S C I P L I N A R Y S E V E R I T Y S C A L E * . 01-015.15 I N M AT E S I G N AT U R E : INTERVIEWER: T I T L E S T A F F PSI REVIEWED Y E S : i 2 C H E C K L I S T ../ N O CENTRAL F I L E R E V I E W E D Y E S N O _Zosie e , „ , „ , r 7 I S T H E R E A H I S T O R Y O F S E X U A L LY A G G R E S S I V E B E H AV I O R ? Y E S COMMENTS: DATE: (3-(95-15 r N O I / it I F GENERAL P H Y S I C A L APPEARANCE I S N O T GOOD, E X P L A I N : PSYCH A L E R T ( Y E S / N O ) N OK F O R G E N E R A L P O P U L A T: O N : Y E S ( I v/7 N O F ( I Y E S , D O N O T RELEASE T O GENERAL P O P U L AT I O N , N O T I F Y P S Y C H O L O G Y ) F NO, E X P L A I N ) "Do you wisn to sell-ioenuTy your sexual orientation, gender identity, any disabilities, and/or self-perception of vulnerability?" tb BOP 2016-03828 142 of 175 TRVBQ .PAGE 0 0 1 i , I N M A T E D I S C I P L I N E D ATA 1 0 C H R O N O L O G I C A L D I S C I P L I N A R Y RECORD * REGISTER N O : 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 N A M E . . ; BROWN, BARRETT LANCASTE F U N C T I O N . . . : P R T F O R M A T ; CHRONO L I M I T T O M O S - 2 * 0 - 2 0 1 5 0 9 : 4 3 : 2 5 PRIOR TO 1 C - 2 0 - 2 0 1 5 REPORT NUMBER/STATUS.: 2 7 5 7 1 6 5 - SANCTIONED I N C I D E N T D AT E / T I M E : 0 8 - 2 2 - 2 0 1 5 0 8 4 0 DEO HEARING D AT E / T I M E : 0 9 - 1 1 - 2 0 1 5 1 2 5 5 FACL/CHAIRPERSON F T W / P E R E Z , P M REPORT REMARKS • I N M AT E S U S E O F DRUGS 112 U S E O F DRUGS/ALCOHOL - F R E Q : 1 A T I : D E B DIS GCT / 4 1 D AY S / C S COMP:010 L A W : ? L O S S O F GOOD CONDUCT T I M E DS / 3 0 D AY S / C S COMP: L A W : LP COMM / 9 0 D AY S / C S COMP: L A W : L O S S O F COMMISSARY STARTING 9 / 1 2 / 1 5 LP E M A I L / 9 0 D AY S / C S COMP: L A W : S T A R T I N G 9 / 1 2 / 1 5 LP PHONE / 9 0 D AY S / C S COMP; L A W : S T A R T I N G 9 / 1 2 / 1 5 LP V I S I T / 9 0 D AY S / C S COMP: L A W ; S T A R T I N G 9 / 1 2 / 1 5 REPORT NUMBER/STATUS.: 2 7 2 8 0 9 3 - SANCTIONED I N C I D E N T D AT E / T I M E : 0 6 - 1 7 - 2 0 1 5 2 0 5 0 DHO HEAR:NG D AT E / T I M E : 0 7 - 1 5 - 2 0 1 5 0 9 1 0 FACL/CHAIRPERSON F T W / C O T T R E L L REPORT REMARKS • I / M ADMITTED T O POSSESSING I N TO X I C A N T S . S TAT E D I ' M GUILTY 113 P O S S E S S I N G DRUGS/ALCOHOL - F R E Q : 1 A T I : D A C DIE GCT / 4 1 DAYS / CS COMP:010 L AW : P CS 3 0 DAYS / CS / COMP: L A LP COMM COMP: L A LP E M A I L COMP: L A LP PHONE COMP: L A LP V I S I T COMP: L A W / W / W / W / W : 90 DAYS / 90 DAYS / CS 90 DAYS / CS 90 DAYS / CS : : : REPORT NUMBER/STATUS.: DEO HEARING D AT E / T I M E : FACL/CHAIRPERSON ' APPEAL CASE NUMBER(S): REPORT REMARKS • G0002 M O R E CS : 2 6 0 9 4 2 3 - SANCTIONED I N C I D E N T D AT E / T I M E : 0 6 - 1 7 - 2 0 1 4 1 8 0 4 12-04-2014 1312 SEA/S. RUIZ 794596 I / m ADMITTED T O REFUSING T O OBEY A N ORDER, B U T D E N I E S COMMITTING A N Y OTHER PROHIBITED A C T. PAGES T O FOLLOW . BOP 2016-03828 143 of 175 Aim\ INMATE D I S C I P L I N E D ATA TRVP-Q * *PAGE 0 0 2 O F 0 0 2 * C H R O N O L O G I C A L D I S C I P L I N A R Y RECORD REGISTER N O : 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 N A M E . . : BROWN, BARRETT LANCASTE F U N C T I O N . . . : P R T F O R M A T : CHRONO L I M I T T O M O S 10-20-2015 C9:43:25 PRIOR TO 1 0 - 2 0 2 0 1 5 DHO HEARING D AT E / T I M E : 1 2 - 0 4 - 2 0 1 4 1 3 1 2 REPORT 2 6 0 9 4 2 3 CONTINUED 307 R E F U S I N G T O OBEY A N ORDER - F R E Q : 1 LP COMM / 3 0 D AY S / C S / SUSPENDED 6 0 DAYS COMP: L A W : L O S S O F COMMISSARY FOR 3 0 DAYS (SUSPEND 6 0 D AY S PENDING CLEAR CONDUCT) LP E M A I L / 3 0 DAYS / C S / SUSPENDED 6 0 DAYS COMP: L A W : L O S S O F E M A I L FOR 3 0 DAYS (SUSPEND 6 0 D AY S PENDING CLEAR CONDUCT) LP PHONE / 3 0 D AY S / C S / SUSPENDED 6 0 D AY S COMP: L A W : L O S S O F TELEPHONE FOR 3 0 D AY S (SUSPEND 6 0 D AY S PENDING CLEAR CONDUCT) LP V I S I T / 3 0 D AY S / C S / SUSPENDED 6 0 D AY S COMP: L A W : L O S S O F V I S I T I N G FOR 3 0 D AY S (SUSPEND 6 0 D AY S PENDING CLEAR CONDUCT) REPORT NUMBER • 2 6 0 9 4 2 3 (REHEARD 1 2 - 0 4 - 2 0 1 4 1 3 1 2 ) OHO HEARING D AT E / T I M E : 0 7 - 3 1 - 2 0 1 4 1 0 2 0 G0005 T R A N S A C T I O N SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED - CONTINUE PROCESSING I F DESIRED BOP 2016-03828 144 of 175 DISCIPLINE HEARING OFFIe.11 REPORT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE INSTITUTION FCI Ft Worth INMATE NAME: BROWN, Barrett BP-A0304 JUN 11 FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS INCIDENT REPORT NUMBER REG NO.: DATE OF INCIDENT 108-22-15 @ 8:40 AM 45047-177 2757165 UNIT Dallas DATE OF INCIDENT REPORT 09-03-15 ig 10:19 AM OFFENSE CODE(S) 112 SUMMARY OF CHARGES Use of any Narcotic not Prescribed by Medical Staff I. NOTICE OF CHARGE(S) A. Advanced written notice of charge (copy of Incident Report) was given to inmate on (date) 0 9 - 0 3 - 1 5 a t (time) 2 : 2 0 P M ( b y staff member) M . Melt Lieutenant B. The DHO Hearing was held on (date) 0 9 - 1 1 - 1 5 a t _ (time) 1 2 : 5 5 PM C. The inmate was advised of his/her rights before the DHO by (staff member): M. atalerrez, Unit Team o n (date) 0 9 - 1 0 - 1 5 @10:52 AM a n d a copy of the advisement of rights form is attached. IL STAFF REPRESENTATIVE A. Inmate waived right to staff representative. BeInmate requested staff representative and N / A . I Yes: 1 a p X p r No: e a r I e d . C. Requested staff representative declined or could not appear but inmate was advised of option to postpone hearing to obtain another staff representative with the result that: N / A D. Staff Representative I NIA I was appointed Staff Representative Statement: N/A III. PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE A. Inmate admits X I Denies I the charge(s). B. Summary of inmate statement: Inmate BROWN, Barrett, Register Number 45047-177 stated, "I am guilty,! did it". C. Witness(es): Yes: 1. The inmate requested witness(es). 1 No; X 2. The following persons were called as witnesses at this hearing and appeared. (Include each witnesses' name, title, reg number and statement as appropriate.) N/A 3. The following persons requested were not called for the reason(s) given. N/A 4. Unavailable witnesses were requested to submit written statements and those statements received were considered. N/A 1 BOP 2016-03828,145 of 175 No N/A i 1 X BP-A0304 JUN 11 FLOERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS DISCIPLINE HEARING OFFIelLA REPORT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE D. Documentary Evidence: In addition to the Incident Report and havestigation, the D110 considered the following documents: • Photo Sheets • S t a f f Memorandums • Clinical Encounters (Health Services) E. Confidential information was used by DHO in support of his findings, but was not revealed to the inmate. The confidential information was documented in a separate report The confidential information has been determined to be reliable because: N/A IV. FINDINGS OF THE DE10 X A. The act was committed as charged. Codes 112 B. The following act was committed: C. No prohibited act was committed: Expunge according to inmate Discipline PS. 5270.09 V. SPECIFIC EVIDENCE RELIED ON TO SUPPORT FINDINGS (Physical evidence, observations, written documents, etc.) The imnate's due process rights were read and reviewed by the DHO to the inmate. The DHO confirmed the inmate received a copy of his incident report, did not want to call any witnesses, did not want a staff representative, and did not have any documentary evidence to submit The inmate understood his due process rights, and was ready to proceed with the DIM Heating. The DHO finds inmate BROWN, Barrett, Register Number 45047-177 committed the prohibited act of Use of any Narcotic not Prescribed by Medical Staff in violation of Code 112. The D1-10 relied upon the reporting officer's statement which indicates on September 3, 2015, at approximately 10:19 a.m., test results were received from Pharmatech Laboratories indicating urine specimen #B0P0002329209 tested positive for Opiates, specifically 537 ng/m. of Morphine. Records indicate on August 22, 2015, at 8:40 a.m., you were administered and observed for a Urinalysis and assigned specimen #B0P0002329209. A review of your medical records indicates you are not prescribed Morphine Based upon the greater weight of the evidence, the DHO is convinced inmate BROWN, Barrett, Register Number 45047-177 did commit the prohibited act of Use of any Narcotic not Prescribed by Medical Staff in violation of Code 112 VI. SANCTION OR ACTION TAKEN • • • • 4 1 Days, Disallowance of Good Conduct Time 3 0 Days, DiseiplinAry Segregation, Suspended 9 0 Days, Loss of Commissary 9 0 Days, Loss of Phone • 9 0 Days, Loss of E-Mail • 9 0 Days, Loss of Visit VII. REASON FOR SANCTION OR ACTION TAKEN 2 BOP 2016-03828 146 of 175 DISCIPLINE HEARING OFFIrbl REPORT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTILE BP-A0304 JUN F.L.JERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS _ Any action on the part of any inmate to use drugs threatens the security of the orderly running of the institution. The disallowance of good conduct time was imposed based on the severity of the offense. The loss of privilege sanctions were imposed encourage inmates to refrain from this type of misconduct and to attempt to ensure future behavior consistent with Bureau regulations and policies. VIM APPEAL RIGHTS: The inmate has been advised of the findings, specific evidence relied on action and reasons for the action. The inmate has been advised of his right to appeal this action within 20 calendar days under the AdministTadve Remedy Procedure. A copy of this report has been given to the inmate. _ . Yes X No 1 I IX. DISCIPLINE HEARING OFFICER Printed Name of DHO Si y - 11- of DHO Date P M Perez, Alternate DHO 0 Scannedand Emalled: Report delivered to inmate via institutional mail: <.) , L 5 c , 1., DATE: 1 2 /— 75— T. Cheesbro, DHO Se TIME: 0:-e-'2g 4----_ 4:00 P.M. (This fowl may be replicated in WP) Replaces BP-S305.052 of MAY 94 3 BOP 2016-03828 147 of 175 • 4 CHECKLIST FOR DHO PACKETS INMATE'S NAME: 81-(3w:1 REG NO. INCIDENT REPORT NO: 1 Z - 1 - 6 1 - ' 1 6Q‘ UNIT: 45047-177 j -14 • - • ' • FACILITY: F C I F o r t W o r t h PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING IN ALL PACKETS: ' Y 9 I N C I D E N T REPORT _____ I N M A T E RIGHTS AT DISCIPLINE HEARING B ? - 2 9 4 . NOTICEO F HEARINGBEFORETHED U O • - - - - - , - - , BP-306, DUTIES OF STAFF REPRESENTATIVE (IF APPLICABLE) m 1 3 P - 3 0 7 , WAIVER OF APPEARANCE (IF APPLICABLE) S T A F F REPRESENTATIVEREQUESTED?- YESO R N O (CIRCLEONE) IF YES, LIST REQUESTED STAFF MEMBER'S NAME AND TITLE W I T N E S S E S REQUESTED?YES0 IF YES, IS WITNESS INFORMATIO C O M P A N I O N CASES?-YES0 INMATES NAMES I N T E R P R E T E R NEEDED?- YES0 S I S RCLE ONE) PLETE, TO INCLUDE REGISTER NUMBER? CLE ONE) RCLE ONE) INVESTIGATIONAT TA C H E D( I FAPPLICABLE) INMATE INJURY ASSESSMENT AND FOLLOWUP (IF APPLICABLE) P H O T O G R A P H S ( I FAPPLICABLE) LAB REPORT/CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM/MEDICAL REVIEW OF RECORDS (IF APPLICABLE) (IF APPLICABLE) ( ' ' SUPPORTIVE MEMORANDUMS - DELAYAVARDEN'S AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED CHRONOLOGICAL DISCIPLINARY RECORD SANCTIONS AVAILABLE TO EXECUTE ?(- PSGDIPSCD/PSSD, GOOD TIME SHEETGOOD TIME DATA; COM? SHEET FOR CURRENT COMP; OLD LAW 7 6 U T EAD .P ., . PEND DUO UDC CHAIRPERSON NAME & TITLE: _ y\Ist-2 PHONE EXTENSION:_: DHO PACKET REVIEWED BY NAME & TITL BOP 2016-03828 148 of 175 BP-A0288. JUN 1 0 I N C I D E N T REPORT c 4 1 - U . S . D E PA R T M E N T O F J U S T I C E FEDERAL B U R E A U O F P R I S O N S Part Institution F C I 1- - s 1 1 I - Incident Report F O R T WORTH, T E X A S 2. I n m a t e ' s N a m e 3. R e g i s t e r N u m b e r 45047-177 4. D a t e o f I n c i d e n t 08-22-2015 7. A s s i g n m e n t UNASSG S A N 8. U n i t BROWN, B A R R E T T 6. P l a c e o f I n c i d e n t F C I P O R T WORTH DAL / HOUSE D / R A N G E 0 C. I n c i d e n t 11 . D e s c r i p t i o n O f I n c i d e n t ( D a t e : 0 9 - 0 3 - 2 0 1 5 T i m e : 1 0 : 1 9 a t 10:19 a.m., t e s t /BED 2 2 8 U IC. P r o h i b i t e d A c t C o d e ( s 11 2 USE O F A N Y N A R C O T I C N O T P R E S C R I B E D B Y M E D I C A L S TA F F On S e p t e m b e r 0 3 , 2 0 1 5 , S. T i m e 08:40 a.m. a m . S t a f f became aware o f i n c i d e n t ) r e s u l t s were r e c e i v e d f r o m Phamatech l a b o r a t o r i e s , i n d i c a t i n g u r i n e specimen #B0P0002329209 t e s t e d p o s i t i v e f o r O p i a t e s , s p e c i f i c a l l y 5 3 7 ng/ml, of Morphine. Records i n d i c a t e on August 22, 2015, a t 08:40 a.m., y o u were administered and observed f o r a U r i n a l y s i s b y t h i s w r i t e r a n d a s s i g n e d specimen #B0P0002329209. A r e v i e w o f your medical records indicates you are not prescribed Morphine. 13.Date And Time 12. T y p e d N a m e / S i g n a t u r e o f R e p p r t j „ n g E m p l o y e e McClendon, T . S I S Te c h n i c i a n , / 4- ' 09-03-2015 1 : 5 0 p.m. 14. I n c i d e n t R e p o r t red t o Above Inmate B y ( P r i n t Name/ i g n a t u r e 15. D a t e I n c i d e n t 1 Report D e l i v e r e d 6 . Time Incident R e p o r t Delivered f / 1 - 4 1 / 6 - --/-72/7717 Part I I C o m m i t t e e 2 / Action 17. C o m m e n t s o f I n m a t e t o C o m m i t t e e R e g a r d i n g A b o v e I n c i d e n t 18. A . I t i s th,, f i n d i n g o f B. t h e committee t h a t you: Committed t h e P r o h i b i t e d A c t a s c h a r g e d . Did n o t Commit a P r o h i b i t e d A c t . The C o m m i t t e e i s r e f e r r i n g t h e a r g e ( s ) t o t h e DHO f o r f u r t h e r Hearing. The C o m m i t t e e a d v i s e d t h e i n m a t e o f C. Committed P r o h i b i t e d A c t Code(s) its finding and of the right to f i l e an a p p e a l w i t h i n 2 0 c a l e n d a r d a y s . 19. C o m m i t t e e D e c i s i o n i s F a s e d o n S p c 7 i f i c E v i d e n c e a s F o l l c w s cs ( ' , . e_ f - committed p r o h i b i t e d a c t ) 20. C o m m i t t e e a c t i o n a n d / o r r e c o g T 5 Z I N 7 e . i W - d ) t i —2 lots ' e N 4 6 ; 0 1)o ) 0 1 T2mcZ, 4 2 7 0 ( 1 O1 ( C o n t i n g e n t u p o n D H O f i n d i n g . eDyHV- e Of A c t i o n ' R I c p _ t ( T h e UDC C h a i r m a n ' s s i g n a t u r e c e r t i f i e s w h o t t h e c o m p l e t e d r e p o r t a c c u r a t e l y r e f l e c t s t h e UDC p r o c e e d i n g s . ) Chairman ( T ature) M e m b e r ( Ty p e d name) Member ( T y p e d N a m e ) INSTRUCTIONS A l l toms outece heavy rule w e tot 31A- ..,se only E e d n entree wail the marbe, I and w o * up. Enthel not competed wig be i,hdect by staff. OtElP113...TE. O R ; G i N A L • c , , , , v a t n t c o m . C O P Y- I - CHO: COPY-2- inmate Attie UOC Achott. COPY-3- inmate ohttlei 14 how's of Pan Preparabon. WDP Prescribed by P5270 BOP 2016-03828 149 of 175 Replaces BP-S288.052 Of MAY 94 Part I I I Date. . n d T i m e I n v e s t i g a t i o n B e g a n 09-03-2015/2:20pm - Investigation 23. I n m a t e A d v i s e d O f R i g h t T o R e m a i n S i l e n t : Y o u A r e A d v i s e d O f Y o u r R i g h t T o R e m a i n S i l e n t A t A l l S t a g e s O f T h e D i s c i p l i n a r y P r o c e s s B u t A r e I n f o r m e d T h a t Y c u r S i l e n c e May Be U s e d To C r a w An A d v e r s e I n f e r e n c e A g a i n s t Y o u A t A n y S t a g e 0 e t i t u t i o n a l D i s c i p l i n a r y Process. Y o u Are A l s o I n f o r m e d T h a t Yo u r S i l e n c e A l o n e Ma N o t B e U s e T o S u p p o r t A F i n d i n g T h a t Y c u h a v e Committed A P r o h i b i t e d A c t . The I n m a t e W a s A d v i s e d O f T h e A b o v e R i g h t B y I Merk A t (Date/time) 09-03-2015/2:20pm 24. I n m a t e S t a t e m e n t A n d A t t i t u d e Inmate Brown 45047-177 was a d v i s e d o f h i s r i g h t s a n d s t a t e d h e u n d e r s t o o d them. Inmate Brown 45047-177 was r e a d t h e c o n t e n t s o f t h i s r e p o r t a n d c h o s e n o t t o make a s t a t e m e n t . Inmate Brown 45047-177 d i s p l a y e d a p o o r a t t i t u d e d u r i n g t h i s i n v e s t i g a t i o n . 25. O t h e r F a c t s A b o u t T h e I n c i d e n t , S t a t e m e n t s O f T h o s e P e r s o n s P r e s e n t A t S c e n e , D i s p o s i t i o n Of E v i d e n c e , E t c . Inmate Brown 45047-177 r e c e i v e d a c o p y o f t h i s i n c i d e n t r e p o r t . A t t a c h e d i s a memo f r o m D r E l l e r : a n d t h e p o s i t i v e O A r e s u l t s . A l l o t h e r f a c t s r e g a r d i n g t h i s i n c i d e n t a r e c o n t a i n e d i n s e c t i o n 11 o f t h e r e p o r t . 26. i n v e s t i g a t o r ' s Comments A n d C o n c l u s i o n s Based upon t h e i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d i n t h e b o d y o f t h e r e p o r t , a t t a c h e d d o c u m e n t s a n d t h e f a i l u r e t o make a s t a t e m e n t , I f i n d t h e r e p o r t t o b e w r i t t e n c o r r e c t l y a n d t h e c h a r g e v a l i d . I t i s t h e recommendation o f t h i s w r i t e r t h a t t h e b o d y o f t h i s r e p o r t d o e s s u p p o r t t h e c h a r g e . 27. A c t i o n Ta k e n P l a c e d i n a d m i n i s t r a t i v e d e t e n t i o n , r e p o r t r e f e r r e d t o t h e UDC f o r f u r t h e r d i s p o s i t i o n . Date A n d T i m e I n v e s t i g a t i o n C o m p l e t e d P r i n t e d Name C stigator 09-03-2015/2:30pm M. M e r k Lieutenant Title S gnature BOP 2016-03828 150 of 175 se • POSITIVE URINALYSIS TEST RESULT INMATE NAME: 11rC:A-,,, R E G . NO. 4 1C ( F e Lt.') ON (DATE) • A T APPROXIMATELY (TIME) A 4 I p m THE ABOVE MENTIONED NMATE PROVIDED URINE SPECIMEN NUMBER - ; ; ; L n , WHICH WAS TESThD BY PHAMATECH LABORATORIES ON (DATE) 0 L• T H E RESULTS OF THE TEST FROM THAT URINE SPECIMEN DETERMNED THAT THE SPECIMEN PROVIDED WAS POSMVE FOR THE FOLLOWING DRUG (S): A REVIEW OF THE ABOVE,NAMED INMATE'S MEDICAL FILE WAS Dr. r,.r c O I R U C T E D ON (DATEfi 3 if B Y (PRINTED NAME & TITLE) M e.Aw t l 0 4 \ 1 1 6T H E INMATE'S MEDICAL FILE LED THAT HE ( W A S / A S NOT)TRESCRIBED MEDICATION WHICH HE WAS ACTIVELY TAKING THAT WOULD RESULT IN A POSITIVE READING FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED DRUG. I CERTIFY THAT THIS VERIFICATION WAS COMPLE i ED BY ME AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT STATEMENT. Dr. PRINTED NAME OF MEDICAL STAFF c-1 ,? r z , . SIGNATURE OF MEDICAL STAFF BOP 2016-03828 151 of 175 - .-- . . .. Fedenl ML of Pnsom Chum of Cuvtodgor smmamnxo. soponazaznos my 1: TO a: comma IV mm mm" A me. Ind Ann-ll! No Fm FCI awn Hanan Rd Fort M. TX 79!" 5- Dmum [firre'H- .m.u.mm m, Imuumfi ".ka .qumm mm mm Dwain-um: DSInpecl DSulurmun Data 1: Inlay X. 1 .-- X. A gym/x Ina-Lem;- .csu Nun. (but. an. MD 51'" 1:10 at comm-ED sun Alina-IMF." Ame-ms. In".sz Um Elm m: Clcoc Dun Dun) flow Doxv Dm- "hue-p}; UM Dial-y Damia- an Spin [jam c. on sipped: [Mi Nunkr. Mun; Lm In column mum": (mun wanna-(Infian lm'Eevm |ou? "mm. usnmnanzuu Bang/1: ion/D a 55 o- -- -- Wavmuunlm z: nm mu m. con 1 Juneau 0F seasons BOP 2016--03828 152 of 175 Bureau of Prisons Health Services Medication Summary Current as of 09103/2015 13:50 Complex: FTW—FORT WORTH POI Inmate: B R O W N , BARRETT LANOASTE Begin Date: N/A E Reg #: 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 n d Date: N/A Quarter: 008-2281) Medications listed reflect prescribed medications from the begin date to end date on this report. Allergies: &max PROzac R e R s c a t s i p h u D a t i l l t o t e s i 1 0 / 0 3 1 2 0 1 2 Recently Expired Prescriptions S e & One HCI 50 MG Tab Take one tablet by mouth daily (IC 10/2/12) ' s e l f c a r r y ' Rx#: 248258-FTW D o c t o r : E i lert, Charles D.O. Start: 03/02/15 E x p : 08129/15 Generatee 09/03/2015 13:50 by Ellett. Charles 0.0, Pharmacy Dispeneings: 158 TAB in 180 days Bureau of Prisons. F r e i P BOP 2016-03828 153 of 175 a g e 1 of 1 BOP 2016-03828 154 of 175 Til-Rolf 51m mmALs: TM fa, Ff. :?zbk? LB?r?xkd? YB. A Fonrfv'?u 12.; '1 WI .1 , • • ; • LI COPY e t c , 1, •STAFFINITIALS. 1 • v-\• 11 Oreta. 1.")(UT: fr••• — / •; el 4..0 LL 4 ) u - 11 I , - • : 1 4* rc_te;tec_ t e•Ne • 11„; I f t,Li14.1tvitt:" I ; CA • , I :IC y •• M 1 - 1 (WS, 1 1 ) . - 7 • • r h . 4 t I- -1L L.401-tt t!•_) I I r F-LiciLL4 e l * 1 0 .5 c.,1 , bine - • • • • ti L A t ' t 4 , ) , t i p C.NC, Stt• I -0.4 I t ( 0 1 . 1J L-t-• _9it! ( 4 ) PlifrotLAJ_ -1i: • :„._••••• 1 ,„./e„.„)1 1. ! • • 114 s, • • 1 1. 1.,'••• -t• , 1_Ct-_t ( I C L...,te I / • Oe%; A t,•-• i t ) kis Je 1•1•14.• 1 1 6.1-L.41 A " 2 1 4 ' • S iDt•4 • • • • • • t • _01 e.‘i,1 1i_ , L _ t! J W •Itc„i T r rr- ( ;t•_ ••• •-1. • ••• 1 ; ' - • '••••• Nj l i 0 / 1 t x , 1; 9t,Tr-t•-• • 1:, , TL 1 1 4 Lit 6,,,a(f r i i'-&A,Aeisl.:rti• reti,•Le t OA i L 5)1)4oi 5,..1 t t r - C 2 0 4 y , ,k) ki.‘tr 1 ) 1-;,R 4 t-1 ' 1 1 / t e t _ ) 1 - „ - - A WstAf-el bt...1 ) : r t t p i c , ' J:', W ' ;:••2 , c 1 1 • ( . 4 1 7-kLV-11; e t 1 ti, 1 3 11-) ) 1 ) ly-14 ;J.'S 1 ' ) •—• tov-tou .txief-J0".1 k LL -i)1)- s i t t J 4 , 1 L , 4 ; , • 9 s 4 BOP 2016-03828 155 of 175 • a n V i•-jtir, BP-A0293 AUG 11 I n m a t e Rights a t U . S . D E PA R T M E N T O F J U S T I C E D i s c i p l i n e H e a r i n g CDERM F E D E R A L BUREAU O F PRISONS I n s t i t u t i o n : FCI P o r t Worth As a n i n m a t e c h a r g e d w i t h a v i o l a t i o n o f B u r e a u o f P r i s o n s r u l e s o r r e g u l a t i o n s referred t o t h e Discipline Hearing O ff i c e r (DUO) f o r disposition, y o u have t h e following rights: I. The r i g h t t o have a w r i t t e n copy o f t h e charge(s) a g a i n s t you hours p r i o r t o a p p e a r i n g b e f o r e t h e D i s c i p l i n e H e a r i n g O f f i c e r ; 2. T h e r i g h t t o h a v e a f u l l - t i m e m e m b e r o f t h e s t a f f w h o i s available t o represent you before the Discipline Hearing Officer; 3. T h e r i g h t t o c a l l witnesses ( o r present written statements witnesses) a n d t o p r e s e n t documentary e v i d e n c e institutional safety would not be jeopardized; i n y o u r o f a t least 24 reasonably unavailable behalf, provided 4. T h e r i g h t t o p r e s e n t a s t a t e m e n t o r t o r e m a i n s i l e n t . Y o u r s i l e n c e m a y b e used t o d r a w a n a d v e r s e i n f e r e n c e a g a i n s t y o u . H o w e v e r, y o u r s i l e n c e a l o n e may not b e u s e d t o s u p p o r t a f i n d i n g t h a t y o u c o m m i t t e d a p r o h i b i t e d a c t ; 5. T h e r i g period o f you e l e c t staff repr h t t o be present throughout the discipline hearing except during a d e l i b e r a t i o n o r when i n s t i t u t i o n a l s a f e t y would be j e o p a r d i z e d . I f n o t t o a p p e a r b e f o r e t h e DHO, y o u m a y s t i l l h a v e w i t n e s s e s a n d a esentative appear on your behalf; 6. T h e r i g h t t o b e a d v i s e d o f t h e D H O ' s d e c i s i o n , t h e f a c t s s u p p o r t i n g t h a t d e c i s i o n , e x c e p t where i n s t i t u t i o n a l s a f e t y would be j e o p a r d i z e d , a n d t h e DHO's disposition i n writing; and, 7. T h e r i g h t t o a p p e a l t h e d e c i s i o n o f t h e DUO b y m e a n s o f t h e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e Remedy P r o c e d u r e t o t h e R e g i o n a l D i r e c t o r w i t h i n 2 0 c a l e n d a r d a y s o f n o t i c e o f the DHO's d e c i s i o n a n d d i s p o s i t i o n . r hereby acknowledge t h a t I have been advised o f hearing before t h e D i s c i p l i n e Hearing O ff i c e r. I I have previously received either t h e above r i g h t s a f f o r d e d me a t a have f u r t h e r been advised t h a t i f a presumptive or effective parole date from the P a r o l e C o m m i s s i o n , a f i n d i n g b y t h e DHO t h a t I c o m m i t t e d t h e p r o h i b i t e d a c t ( s ) m a y result i n a r e s c i s s i o n o r r e t a r d a t i o n b y t h e P a r o l e Commission o f t h e presumptive or e f f e c t i v e p a r o l e d a t e . Inmate's Name: Brown R Inmate S i g n a t u r e : Notice o f rights P given M. J by: e t o a inm r e s L N o . : 45047-177 o t e / t i m e ) : P r i n L Q d 1 T h i s f o r m m a y b e r e p l i c a t e d v i a WP) P . : 09/10/20:5 0 9 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 5 / Gutierrez S t a f f PDF g c r i 1( : - L a t u r e R b e e p d l a c by P5270 BOP 2016-03828 156 of 175 e s B P - S 2 9 a ( 5 2 ) o f J AW 5 5 . BP-A0294 Notice o f AUG 1 1 D i s c i p l i n e H e a r i n g B e f o r e t h e (DHO) U . S . D E PA R T M E N T O F J U S T I C E F E D E R A L BUREAU O F PRISONS FCI F o r t W o r t h Institution 09/10/2015 Date TO: B r o w n MEG. N O . : 4 5 0 4 7 77 ALLEGED V I O L A T I O N ( S : U s e o f N a r c o t i c N o t P r e s c r i b e d b y M e d i c a l S t a f f D AT E O F O F F E N S E : 0 8 / 2 2 / 2 0 1 5 CODE N o . : 1 1 2 You a r e b e i n g r e f e r r e d t o t h e CHO f o r t h e a b o v e c h a r g e ( s L The h e a r i n g w i l l b e h e l d e n : Next A v a i l a b l e a t 0 8 : 0 0 at t h e f o i l t w i n g -ccati.on: SHU You a r e e n t i t l e d t o h a v e a f u : _ f s t a f f member r e p r e s e n t y o u a l I n c h e a r i n g . P l e a s e i n d i c t e b e l o w whether y o u d e s i r e t o h v e a s t a : : r e p r e s e n t a t i v e , a n d i f s o , h i s o r h e r name. 1 (ob' ( d o not wish t o h a v e a s t a f f r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . I f s o , t h e s t a f f r e p r s e n t a t i v e s name i s : YOU w i l l a l s o h a v e t h e r i g h t t o c a l l w i t n e s s e s a t t h e h e a r i n g a n d t o p r e s e n t c u m e n t a r y e v i d e n c e i n y o u r behalf; provided, c a l l i n g your witnesses w i l l not jeopardize i n s t i t u t i o n a l a f e t y . Names o f witnesses you wish t o c a l l s h o u l d b e t e d b e l o w. B r i e f l y s t a t e t o w h a t e a c h p r o p o s e w. . . t n e n w o u l d be a b l e t o t e s t i f y . do) ( c o not) w i s h t o h a v e .....tnesses. NAME: CAN T E S T: . NAME: CAN T E S T : F Y T O : NAME: • . n e Hearing • f i c e r c1:1 w h o a r e d e t e r m i n e d • y s t h e DHC e h a v e 2 T O : C : , - e s s e s ( S t a f f o r Inmate) who a r e reasonably available, i n t o r m a t o n relevant t o the charge(s). R e p e t i t i v e witnesses and r e p e t i t i v e g h r a c t e r e f e r e n c e s need n o t b e c a l l e d . U n a v a i l a b l e w i t n e s s e s may b e a s k e d t o s u b m i t w r i t t e n statements. If additional s OHO. c c i s needed, u s e t h e r e v e r s e s i d e o f t h i s f o r m . D a t e , s i g n . a n d r e t u r n t h i s f o r m t o t h e / DATE: I S:GNA:URE: Ji N o t i c e o f h e a r i n g t , - r e CHO g i v e n i n m a t e 0 9 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 5 e 1 D M . 3 Date/Time M i l s f o r m may Sc re,,_ PDF P r e 4 t e d s v4a c R r i e b p e S l d t a a Gut: f c by P5270 BOP 2016-03828 157 of 175 f Pr e ace/Signature s 8P-294(52) o f JAN 88 Algill, Ama,, AM% Alm", D I S C I P L I N A R Y S E A R I N G O F F I C E R REPORT U . S . DEPARTMENT O F J U S T I C E Name of Inmate: FEDERAL BUREAU O F P R I S O N S BROWN BARRETT R N o . : 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 H e a r i n Date: 7/15/15 Institution; FC1 Fort Worth I n c i d e n_ t Report Number: NAME OF INMATE: BROWN, Barrett REG. NO.: 45047-177 Date of Incident: 6/17/15 Date of Incident Report: 6/18/15 (Re-write) Summary of Charges: Possession of Drugs/Alcohol O f f e n s e Code: 12728093 UNIT: San Antonio 113 1. NOTICE OF CHARGE(S) A. Advanced written notice of charge (copy of Incident Report) was given to inmate on: 6/19/15 (date) at (time) 12:50 p.m. (by staff member) J. Harrison, Lieutenant 7/15/15 B. T h e DHO Hearing was held on (date) 9:10 a.m. at (time) C. T h e inmate was advised of the rights before the DHO by (staff member): V. Ivory and a copy of the advisement of rights form is attached. on (date) I 6/24/15 II. STAFF REPRESENTATIVE Yes A. Inmate waived right to staff representative. X N/A B. Inmate requested staff representative and No appeared. C. Requested staff representative declined or could not appear but the inmate was advised of option to postpone hearing to obtain another staff representative with the results that: 1N/A D. Staff representative N / A j was appointed. III. PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE A. Inmate X (admits) ((denies) B. Summary of Inmate Statement: I I'm guilty. C. Witnesses: 1. The inmate requested witnesses. Yes J No 2. The following persons were called as witness at the hearing and appeared: N/A 1 3. A summary of the testimony of each witness is attached 4. The following persons requested were not called for the reason(s) given: N/A Page 1 of 3 BOP 2016-03828 158 of 175 N/A min% A l m k DISCIPLINARy BEARING OFFICER REPORT U . S . DEPARTMENT O F aUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU O F PRISONS Name of Inmate: B R O W N BARRETT Re N o . : 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 H e a r i n Date: 7/15/15 5. Unavailable witnesses were requested to submit written statements and those statements received were considered: N/A D. Documentary Evidence: In addition to the Incident Report and Investigation, the DHO considered the following documents Photograph E. Confidential information was used by the DHO in support of his findings, but was not revealed to the inmate. The confidential information was documented in a separate report The confidential information has been (confidential informants have been) determined to be reliable because: N/A IV, FINDINGS OF THE DHO X A. The act was committed as charged. B. The following act was committed. C. No prohibited act was committed: Expunged according to Inmate Discipline PS. V. SPECIFIC EVIDENCE RELIED ON TO SUPPORT FINDINGS (Physical evidence, observation, written documents, etc.) Your due process rights were reviewed with you. I confirmed you received a copy of the incident report, did not want a staff representative, did want to call witnesses, and had no documentary evidence to present. You understood your due process rights and were prepared to proceed with your disciplinary hearing. I find you have committed the prohibited act of Code 113, Possession of a Drugs/Alcohol, on June 17, 2015, at FCI Ft. Worth. The evidence relied upon to support this finding is the written statement of Officer Rivera, dated June 18, 2015 (Re-write), stating On June 17, 2015 at approximately 8:35 p.m., during a Breathalyzer test, I decided to search I?M Brown's locker and found a coffee mug full of homemade intoxicants. Ops Lieutenant was notified and WM Brown was escorted by the compound officer to SHU. The homemade intoxicants subsequently tested .400 with the Alco-Sensor IV. The photo of the test results of intoxicants, dated June 17, 2015, was also relied upon. At the DHO hearing you admitted possession of intoxicants, and stated I'm guilty. In deciding this issue, the DHO found you committed the prohibited acts of Code 113, Possession of a Drugs/Alcohol. Therefore, based on the reporting officer's written statement, photo of the test results of the intoxicants dated June 17, 2015, your self-admission and your statement of, "I'm guilty." supports the finding you committed the prohibited act. Therefore, the DHO concluded that the Code 113, Possession of Drugs/Alcohol, against you is appropriate and warranted. VI. SANCTIONS OR ACTION TAKEN Offense Severity: Greatest SGT Available: N/A Page 2 of 3 BOP 2016-03828 159 of 175 .0•16% omp, DISCIPLn/ARY REARING OFFICER REPORT U . S . DEPARTMENT O F JUSTICE Name of Inmate: FEDERAL BUREAV OF PRISONS BROWN BARRE-Tr Re N 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 H e a r i n : Date. 7/15/15 Disallowance of Good Conduct Time: 41 days Disciplinary Segregation: 30 days Loss of Privileges: LP Phone 90 days LP CommiscRry 90 days LP Visit 91) days LP Email 90 days VII. REASON FOR SANCTION OR ACTION TAKEN The sanction against Good Conduct Time was used to comply with the mandatory sanctioning guidelines for inmates sentenced under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). Behavior of this nature is considered disruptive to the safety, security, and orderly operation of the institution. Therefore, the inmate was sanctioned to disciplinary segregation to ensure the safety of all inmates and staff within the institution. Loss of privileges was imposed to correct the present inappropriate behavior and deter the inmate and others from future behavior of this type. VIII. APPEAL RIGHTS: Yes: The inmate has been advised of the findings, specific evidence relied on action and reasons for the action. The inmate has been advised of his right to appeal this action within 20 calendar days under the Administrative RemedyProcedure. A copy of this reporthasbeen given to the inmate. - . IX. Disciplinary Hearing Officer Printed Name . E. Cottrell, DHO Delivered to imitate: Date Signature ..,//if • /A z { 4 -010' 1 /6nr Date and Time Delivered: Page 3 of 3 BOP 2016-03828 160 of 175 7-2/-15-- /,-1_57,---- Amok Amok CHECKLIST FOR DUO PACKETS INMATE'S NAME: BROWN, i 3 a r r e t t L a n c a s t e r REG. NO 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 INCIDENI REPOR I- NO: 7 4 - r i - e IC UNIT: - - - - - ) Q X \ Ts < FACILITY: F C I F o r t W o r t h PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING IN ALL PACKETS: I N C I D E N T REPORT B P - 2 9 3 . INMATERIGIIISAT DISCIPLINEHEARING BP-294. NOTICE OF I WARING BEFORE TIIE DHO B P - 3 0 6 . DUTIESO F STAFFREPRESENTATIVE(IFAPPLICABLE.) 4 4 4 BP-307. WAIVER OF APPEARANCE (IF APPLICABLE) k - S T A F F REPRESENTATIVEREQUESTED?- YESOR(SK)-4CIRCLEONE) IF YES. LIS I' REQUESTED STAFF MEMBER'S NAME AND TITLE --WITNESSES REQUESTED? YES 0 C I R C 1 E ONE) IF YES. IS WITNESS INFORMATION COMPLETE. TO INCLUDE REGISTER NUMBER? C O M P A N I O N CASES?- YESO R NOf'/IIRCLEONE) INMATES NAMES / V / 4 4 S I INTERPRETER NEEDED? - YES OR NO (CIRCLE ONE) S INVESTIGATIONATIACHED(IFAPPIICABLE) I N M A T E INILfRYASSESSMENTA N D FOLLOWUP(IFAPPLICABLE) -PHOTOGRAPHS (IF APPLICABLE) t.AB REPORT/CHAIN OF CUSTODY FOR MiMEDICAI RI VIEW ()I: RECORDS (IF APPLICABLE) SUPPORTIVE MEMORANDUMS - DELAY/WARDEN'S AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED (IF APPLICABLE) CHRONOLOGICAL DISCIPLINARY RECORD 1 7 7 7 7 S A N C T I O N S AVAILABLET O EXECUTE PSGDPSCD/PSSD. GOOD TIME DATA; COMP SHEET FOR CURRENT COMP: OLD LAW GOOD TIME SHEET V P D A T E E 7 1 P E N D DUO IX' CI IAIRPFRSON NAME It TITLE: PI IONE EXTENSION: DUO PACKE I RI VIEWED BY NAME Ilk FIRE: BOP 2016-03828 161 of 175 olMin BP-A0288 AUG 1 1 I N C I D E N T REPORT 0DIFFtm U . S D E PA R T M E N T O F J U S T I C E FEDERAL BUREAU O F P R I S O N S Part I - Incident Report 1. I n s t i t u t i o n : F C I F O R T WORTH 2. I n m a t e ' s Name BROWN , B A R R E T T 3. R e g i s t e r N u m b e r 45047-177 4. D a t e c : I n c i d e n t f. Time 06/17/2015 S:35 pm 6. P l a c e o f I n c i d e n t SAN ANTONIO U N I T 7. A s s i g n m e n t UNASSG SAN A N TO N I O U N I T 8. U n i t 9. I n c i d e n t 10. P r o h i b i t e d A c t C o d e ( s 113 POSSESION O F ALCOHOL 11 . D e s c r i p t i o n O f I n c i d e n t ( D a t e : 0 6 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 5 T i m e : 8 : 3 5 p m S t a f f became aware o f i n c i d e n t ) THIS I S A REWRITE O F I R 4 2 7 2 8 0 9 3 . 0 N J U N E 1 7 2 0 1 5 A T APPROXIMATELY 8 : 3 5 P M , D U R I N G A RANDOM BREATHALYZER T E S T I D E C I D E D T O SEARCH I N M AT E S BROWN 4 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 LOCKER A N D FOUND A COFFEE MUG F U L L O F HCME MADE I N T O X I C A N T. O P E R AT I O N S L T WAS INFORMED A N D I N M AT E BROWN 4 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 WAS ESCORTED B Y T H E COMPOUND O F F I C E R T O S H U . T H E HOME MADE I N T O X I C A N T SUBSEQUENTLY TESTED . 4 0 0 WITH ALCO-SENSOR I V . 12. T y p e d N a m e / S i g n a t ARMANDO J R I V E R A Employee 13.Date A n d Time 6/18/2015 9:31 pm 14. I n c i d e n t R e p o r t D e l i v ( Ty p e N . e / S i g n a t u r 15. D a t e I n c i d e n t to Above Inmate By Report D e l i v e r e d - r r Part II - Committee 16. T i m e I n c i d e n t R e p o r t Delivered Action • 17. Comme t s o f I n m a t e t o C o l n a i . k t e I g a r d l n A b c v e : t r i d e n t 0 18. A . I t C 1 1 4 i s the finding N c • - C o f t h e committee t h a t you: \61.1y:The C o m m i t t e e i s r e f e r r i n g t h e C h a r g e ( s ) t o t h e DHO f o r f u r t h e r Hearing. The C o m m i t t e e a d v i s e d t h e i n m a t e o f Committed t h e P r o h i b i t e d A c t a s c h a r g e d . Did n o t Commit a P r o h i b i t e d A c t . Committed P r o h i b i t e d A c t C o d e ( s ) Comm ' C c : 4 <.! its finding and of the right to f i l e an a p p e a l w i t h i n 2 0 c a l e n d a r d a y s . tee Dec 4 ion i s Btallon a % f i c EviOvIce on Followl: \fN. 21. C o m m i t t e e a c t i o n a n d l o r r e c o m m e n d a t i o n i f r e f e r r e comm:tted p , h i b i t e d a c t ) a_ 21. D a t e A n d T i m e 0 s a t o n t h e UDC a n d ka \ A N S 4 t o DHO ( C o n t i n g e n t u p o n DHO f i n d i n g i n m a t e N ( " - t ( 11 ? OZ"c'e Q r i )( hA a tc t it o n l e l- .e- tGet \dC r e1p ;o r t \ a•c cI uCr aNt eI yC ree f UDC aD nC ' s psr iogcneaetdui rneg sc. e) r t i f i e s w h o co. lectC s htahi rem U N'4 , Chairman ( Ty p e d N e / S i g n a t u r INSTRUCTIONS: A l l items outside heav) rul c M e m b e r ( T y p e d Name) Member ( T y p e d N a m e ) for siarl use only B e g i n entries with the number I and work up Entries not completed will bc voided by stair DISTRIUUTE; O R I G I N A L - C e n t r a l File record; C O P Y- I - DUO; COPY-2- Innialc After CDC Action: COPY-3- Inmate within 24 hours of Part I Preparation_ PDF Prescribed by P5270 BOP 2016-03828 162 of 175 Replaces BP-S288 052 Of MAY 94 All.b• a u k I N C I D E N T REPORT Conit1 BP-A0288 AUG 1 1 U . S . D E PA RT M E N T O F J U S T I C E FEDERAL BUREAU O F P R I S O N S Part I - Incident Report 1. I n s t i t u t i o n : F C I F O R T WORTH 2. I n m a t e ' s Name 3. R e g i s t e r N u m b e r 4. j a t e o f I n c i d e n t BROWN , B A R R E T T 45047-177 06/17/2015 6. P l a c e o f I n c i d e n t SAN ANTONIO U N I T 7. A s s i g n m e n t UNASSG 8. U n i t SAN A N TO N I O U N I T 9. I n c i d e n t i.. T i m e 8:50 pm 10. P r o h i b i t e d A c t C o d e ( s ) 113 POSSES ION O F ALCOHOL 11 . D e s c r i p t i o n O f I n c i d e n t ( D a t e : j o 2 . 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 T i m e : P m S t a f f becam- . . . a r e O f i n c i d e n t ) ON J U N E 1 7 2 0 1 5 A T APPROXIMATE 8 : 3 5 P M , D U R I N G A RANDOM BREATHALYZER T E S T I I l L I D E D T O SEARCH INMATES BROWN 11 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 LOCKER A N D FOUND A COFFEE MUG F U L L O F P R I S O N MADE I N T H O X I C A N T. O P E R AT I O N S LT WAS INFORMED A N D I N M AT E BROWN # 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 WAS ESCORTED B Y T H E COMPOUNP O F F I C E R T O SMU. 12. T y p e d N a m e / S i g n a t i > " o f R e ARMANDO J R I V E R A 13.Date A n d Time i . E m p l o j e e 6/17/2015 11 : 5 7 pm 15. D a t e I n c i c l e n t Repo D e l i v e- r e d " t 4 / Y r e l tame/Si k, 1(1Af., A ) 14..Ancident Repor ? t r i v e . 18. A . I t I I - Inmate t o CoRmittee Regarding i s the finding o Committee A c t i o n A b r C C e e .t, t h e committee t h a t you: >4...y Committed t h e P r o h i b i d A c t a s charged„. Did n o t Commit a P r o h i b i d A c t . Committed P r o h i b i t e d A c t C e ( s ) 19,r-csmmi e e D e c i i i k4,42- i s Bas U un . e c 1 Report D e l i v e r e d t o Above Inmate By Part 17. C o m m e n t o f 16. T i m e I n c i d e n t 4 i d . , c e a its finding and of the right to f i l e an a p p e a l w i t h i n 2 0 c a l e n d a r d a y s . as Follows: r L I V S K A I M The C o m m i t t e e i s r e f e r r i n g t h e C h a r g e ( s ) t o t h e OHO f o r f u r t h e r Hearing. The C o m m i t t e e a d v i s e d t h e i n m a t e o f - I M M I I M I M I I M 1111 M B 20. C o m m i t t e e a c t i o n a n d / o r r committed p r o h i b i t e d a c t ) 0 ( C o n t i n g e n t u p o n OHO f i n d i n g i n m a t e f,f3c. 21. D a t e A n d T i N\Jsat on t h e UDC A c t i o n • -1The UDC C h a i r m a n ' s s i g n r e c e r t i f i e s w h o co p l e t e d r e p o r t a c c u r a e l y r e f l e c t s t h e U D C p r o c e e d i n g s . ) that the Member ( T y p e d Name) Cha_rman ( T y p N a m e / S i r a t u r e ) M e m b e r ( T y p e d Name, INsTRVC MONS A l l t crtil outside h a y r u k arc rill staff use only Begin crimes wah the number i arid work up A n e w, not compkwd will be voided b t o l l DISTRIBUTE O R K I I N A L , C c u l t a l Rile record, 1 3 1 1 0 ; COPY-2- himatc Alter UDC Action; COPY-I- Inmatc within 24 hours of Putt I Ptcparation. POP Prescribed by P5270 BOP 2016-03828 163 of 175 Peolaces BP-S288052 Of MAY 94 01.10,4 OM& j a b s , PART III - IN VES1IGATION 22. DK! c AND TIME INVESTIGATION BEGAN 611915 . 12:50 p.m. 23. INMATE ADVISED OF RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT; You are advised of your right to remain silent at all stages of the discipline process. Your silence may be used to draw an adverse inference against you at any stage of the discipline process. Your silence alone may not be used to support a finding tha you h ve co,nitted a prohibited act. IL- . t - t / , - . . I • THE INMATE WAS ADVISED OF THE _ . . . - - - - - ABOVE RIGHT BY: . I . Ha • n . Lieutenant A TIME) 6 / 1 9 / 1 5 . 12:50 p.m. I Tk A (DATE N 24. INMATE STATEMENT AND ATTITUDE Inmate BROWN Reg. No. 45047-177 was advised of his right to remain silent and understood his right. Inmate BROWN Reg. No. 45047-177 did not want to make a statement. Inmate BROWN Reg. No. 45047-177 displayed a Fair attitude during this investigation. 25. OTHER FACTS ABOUT THE INCIDENT. STATEMENTS OF THOSE PERSONS PRESENT AT SCENE. DISPOSITION OF EVIDENCE, ETC Inmate BROWN Reg. No. 45047-177 did not identify any witnesses on his behalf or ask for any other person to be interviewed at this time. All known facts at this time are in the written report. staff memos, photo sheet. 26. INVESTIGATOR'S COMMENTS AND CONCLUSIONS Based on the inmates silence, the report as written and supporting documentation, it is the conclusion of this investigator that the report is considered accurate and the charges valid. Inmate BROWN Reg. No. 45047-177 was asked if he wanted to make a statement and he replied "No.27. ACTION TAKEN Inmate BROWN Reg. No. 45047-177 is to remain in the Special Housing Unit pending UDC. DATE AND TIME INVESTIGATION COMPLETED: 6 / 1 9 PRINTED NAME/SIGNATURE OF INVESTIGATOR: J 1 5 . . 1:06 p.m. Harrison , —..---------Lieutenant ._.-------11G- NATURE T I T L BOP 2016-03828 164 of 175 E 00,11i.l e b k BP-A0294 N o t i c e o f D i s c i p l i n e H e a r i n g B e f o r e t h e (DHO) ciwwl AUG 1 1 U . S . DEPARTMENT O F J U S T I C E FEDERAL BUREAU O F PRISONS FC1 F o r t W o r t h ns t i tup. i o n ( TO: B R O W N , B a r r e t t Lancaster t-;Lf 6 Cat • REG. N O . : 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 ALLEGED V I O L A T I O N ( S ) : F o s s e s s i n g D r u g s / A l c o h o l DATE O F O F F E N S E ; 0 6 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 5 CODE N O . : 1 1 3 You a r e b e i n g r e l e r r e d t o t h e D H O t o t t h e a b o v e c n a r g e ( s ) . Next A v a i l a b l e The h e a t i n g w i l l b e h e l d o n : a t ) A . Y You a x e e n t i t l e d t o h a v e a f u l l - t i m e s t a f f m e m b e r r e p r e s e n t y o whether y o u d e s i r e t o h a v e a s t a f f r e p r e s e n t a t i v e , a n d 1 ! s o , s I Ido) Id° n o t ) w i s h . / R . M a t t h e followinglocation: a t the hearing. P l e a 5 e o r h u t name. indicate below t o have a s t a f f representetiv I f s o , t h e s t a f f r e p r e s e n t a t i v e ' s name a s You w i l l 4 1 5 0 h a v e t h e r i g h t t o c a l l w i t n e s s e s a t t h neering and t o present documentary evidence i n your behalf; provided, c a l l i n g your witnesses w i l l not j pardiLe i n s t i t u t i o n a l s a f e t y. N a m e s o f witnesses you wisn t o c a l l s h o u l d b e l i s t e d b e l o w. B r i e f i y s t e t to w h a t e a c h p r o p o s e d w i t n e s s w o u I d b e a b l e t o t e s t i l y . f l o l . ) 4 ( d o not) w . s h t o h,,,e * . I n e s s CAN T E S T I F Y T O ; CAN T E S T I F Y T O : NAME; CAN T E S T I F Y T O : Ihe D i s c i p l i n e r a n g L : d . . those witnesses !I,ta:: Cr * n u a r e r e a s o n a r. . . y a v a i i a i i i e , and w h o a r e d e t e m i n e d b y t h e OHO t o h a v e I n f o r m a t i o n r e l e v a n t t o t h e c h a r g e ( s ) . R e p e t i t i v e w i t n e s s e s a n d r e p e t i t i v e cha • c t e r r e f e r e n c e s need n o t b e c a l l e d . U n a v a i l a b l e witnesses may b e asked t o submit w r i t t e n statements. If aciditi.Jna, space: . DHO. needed. u s e t h e reverse s i d e o f t h i s form. D a t e , DATE; , I G N AT U R E : \ N o t i c e e t h e a r i n g b e f o r e DHO g i v e n i n m a t e Datt/Time by N (This f o r m may b e r e p l i c a t e d v i a wp) PDF sign, and return this form to the P r e s c r Staff Print a m e / S i g n a t re Oeplaces O P 2941521 o f J A h i b e d by P5270 BOP 2016-03828 165 of 175 ANS. BP-A0293 AUG I I I n m a t e R i g h t s a t D i s c i p l i n e H e a r i n g 7DERm U . S . DEPARTMENT O F J U S T I C E F E D E R A L BUREAU O F P R I S O N S I n s L : t u t i o n : F C I F o r t •.•tor;_:-. As a n i n m a t e c h a r g e d w i t h a v i o l a t i o n o f B u r e a u o f P r i s o n s r u l e s o r r e g u l a t i o n s referred t o t h e D i s c i p l i n e Hearing O ff i c e r (DHO) f o r disposition, y o u have t h e following rights: 1. T h e r i g h t t o h a v e a w r i t t e n c o p y o f t h e c h a r g e ( s ) a g a i n s t y o u a t l e a s t 2 4 hours p r i o r t o a p p e a r i n g b e f o r e t h e D i s c i p l i n e H e a r i n g O f f i c e r ; 2. T h e r i g h t t o h a v e a f u l l - t i m e m e m b e r o f t h e s t a f f w h o i s r e a s o n a b l y available t o represent you before the Discipline Hearing Officer; 3. T h e r i g h t to c a l l witnesses ( o r present written statements o f unavailable witnesses) a n d t o p r e s e n t documentary e v i d e n c e institutional safety would not be jeopardized; i n your behalf, provided 4. T h e r i g h t t o p r e s e n t a s t a t e m e n t o r t o r e m a i n s i l e n t . Y o u r s i l e n c e m a y b e used t o d r a w a n a d v e r s e i n f e r e n c e a g a i n s t y o u . H o w e v e r, y o u r s i l e n c e a l o n e may not b e u s e d t o s u p p o r t a f i n d i n g t h a t y o u committed a p r o h i b i t e d a c t ; 5. T h e r i g h t t o b e p r e s e n t t h r o u g h o u t t h e d i s c i p l i n e h e a r i n g e x c e p t d u r i n g a period o f d e l i b e r a t i o n o r when i n s t i t u t i o n a l s a f e t y would b e j e o p a r d i z e d . I f you e l e c t n o t t o a p p e a r b e f o r e t h e D H O , y o u m a y s t i l l h a v e w i t n e s s e s a n d a staff representative appear on your behalf; 6. T h e r i g h t t o b e a d v. : . s e d o f t h e D H O ' s d e c i s i o n , t h e f a c t s s u p p o r t i n g t h a t d e c i s i o n , e x c e p t where i n s t i t u t i o n a l s a f e t y w o u l d be j e o p a r d i z e d , a n d t h e DHO's disposition i n writing; and, 7. T h e r i g h t t o a p p e a l t h e d e c i s i o n o f t h e D H O b y m e a n s o f t h e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e Remedy P r o c e d u r e t o t h e R e g i o n a l D i r e c t o r w i t h i n 2 0 c a l e n d a r d a y s o f n o t i c e o f the DHO's d e c i s i o n a n d d i s p o s i t i o n . I h e r e b y acknowledge t h a t I h a v e b e e n a d v i s e d o f t h e a b o v e r i g h t s a f f o r d e d me a t a hearing b e f o r e t h e D i s c i p l i n e Hearing O f f i c e r. I have f u r t h e r been advised t h a t i f I have previously received e t h e r a presumptive o r e ff e c t i v e parole date from the P a r o l e C o m m i s s i o n , a f i n d i n g b y t h e DHO t h a t I c o m m i t t e d t h e p r o h i b i t e d a c t ( s ) m a y r e s u l t i n a r e s c i s s i o n o r r e t a r d a t i o n b y t h e P a r o l e Commission o f t h e presumptive or e f f e c t i v e p a r o l e d a t e . I n m a t e ' s N a m e : BROWN. B a r r e t t L a n c a s t e r Reg. N o . ; Inmate S i g n a t u r e : 45047-17'1 Da •..e Notice o f r i g h t s g i v e s t e / t me): by: Et f Printe Name/Signature ( T h i s f o r m m a y b e r e p l i c a t e d v i a WI') R e p l a c e s B P - S 2 9 3 ( 5 2 ) o f J A N B13. 1 PDF P r e s c r i b e d by P5270 BOP 2016-03828 166 of 175 AdEllb • • - U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Federal correctional Instituthm Fort Worth, Texas 76119-5996 June 17.2015 MEMORANDUM FOR C. SCI-IINDEHETTE OPERATIONS LIEUTENANT FROM: T . McClendon SIS Technician - SUBJECT: B r e a t h a l y z e r Test and Admit To Guilt RE: BROWN. BARRETT Reg. No. 45047-177 On June 17. 2015. at approximately 8:35 p.m.. while I was administering a breathalyzer test with the Alco-Sensor IV to inmate BROWN, BARRETT. Reg. No. 45047-177. Activities Lieutenant D. Christie questioned inmate BROWN if he was intoxicated to which inmate BROWN stated. "No. but have you'r. Inmate BROWN further stated when questioned where he obtained the homemade intoxicant discovered in his secure locker. "Yeah its mine. I bought it from a hooch distributer on the unit.- Inmate BROWN.s breathalyzer test result was .000. T h e intoxicants found in inmate BROWN's clear plastic cup tested at .400. SCANNED (*.OSP+ D A T E : - / STOWINITIALS: BOP 2016-03828 167 of 175 Page 168 of 175 ••,'Vithheict pursuant to exemption tb)(7)(EL(b)(7)(F) of the Freedom of information and Privacy Act e•khN .40N DISCIPLINE HEARING OFFICER REPORT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE INSTITUTION EC: SEAGOVILLE INMATE NAME BROWN, B a r r e t t DATE O F :WCIDENT BP-S305.052 M AY 94 FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS INCIDENT REPORT NUMBER UNIT PEG NO 1 4 5 0 4 7 - 1 7 7 0 6 - 11 - 2 0 7 4 2609423 J04 DATE. O F I N C I D E N T REPORT OFFENSE CODE(S) 3C1 SUMMARY O F CHARGES R e f u s i n g t o Obey a n O r d e r 11 - 11 - 2 0 ) 4 NOTICE C F CHARGE(S) A. A d v a n c e d w r i t t e n n o t i c e o f c h a r g e ( c o p y o f I n c i d e n t R e p o r t ) w a s g i v e r t o I n m a t e O n (date) 1 1 - 1 2 - 2 0 1 4 1 5 C 7 ( b P. T h e DHO H e a r i n g w a s h e l d o n c i a t e l y S t a f f member) L i e u t e n a n t J . W i l s o n 1 2 - 0 3 - 2 0 1 4 a t (time) 1 3 1 2 C. T h e i n m a t e w a s a d v i s e d o f h i s / h e r r i g h t s b e f o r e t h e OHO b y ( s t a f f m e m b e r ) : R. D e L a To r r e , C o u n s e l o r o n (date) 1 1 - 1 6 - 2 0 1 4 a n d a copy of t h e advisement o f r i g h t s f o r m t s attached_ i i . S T A F F REPRESENTATIVE Yes: A. I n m a t e w a i v e d r i o h t t o s t a f f r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . Inmate r e q u e s t e d s t a f f r e p r e s e n t a t i v e a n d A p p No: XX e a r e d / Waived. 14/A C. R e q u e s t e d s t a f f r e p r e s e n t a t i v e o e c - i i n e d o r c o u l d n e t a p p e a r b u t i n m a t e w a s a d v i s e d o f o p t i o n t o p o s t p o n e h e a r i n g t o o b t a i n a n o t h e r s t a f f r e p r e s e n t a t i v e w i t h t h e r e ssu ult that: N / A N/A D. S t a f f r e p r e s e n t a t i v e appointee E. S t a f f r e p r e s e h t a t i v e s t a t e m e n t : N / A I I I . P R E S E N TAT I O N O F EVIDENCE Inmate a d m i t s Fl dentes I - 1 B. S u m m a r y o f i n m a t e s 7 a t e m e n t : I a d m i t t o r e f u s i n g an o r d e r, b u t deny committing any o t h e r p r o h i b i t e d a c t . C. W i t n e s s ( e s ) : N / A Yes: . The inmate requested witness(es;. 0 : 2 T h e f o l l o w i n g p e r s o n s w e r e c a l l e d a n w i t n e s s e s a t t h i s he.,,ring a n d appeaz'eJ. ( I n c l u d e each w i t n e s s e s ' n a m e , t i t l e , r e g n u m b e r a n d s t a t e m e n t a s a p p r o p r i a t e . ) N/A The f o 1 1 o w i r y p e r s o n s r e a u e s t e e w e r e n o t c a l l e d f o r t h e r e a s o n ( s ) g i v e n . Page I o f 3 BOP 2016-03828 169 of 175 '1'16 011111k. /016 \ e11•6N DISCIPLINE HEARING OFFICER REPORT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BP-S305.052 M AY 94 FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS N/A 4. U n a v a i l a b l e w i t n e s s e s w e r e r e q u e s t e d t o s u b m i t w r i t t e n statements and those statements r e c e i v e d were considered. No N/A I Ye s D. D o c u m e n t a r y E v i d e n c e : I n a d d i t i o n t o t h e I n c i d e n t R e p o r t a n d I n v e s t i g a t i o n , t h e DHO considered t h e f o l l o w i n g documents: Inmate I n v e s t i g a t i v e R e p o r t , d a t e 0 7 - 1 6 - 2 0 1 4 , p r e p a r e d b y L a n c e R o a e r s , I n v e s t i g a t o r ; C o p i e s o f Memorandums d a t e d J J n e 1 7 , 2 C 1 4 , t o N . C a r o , O p e r a t i o n s I j e u t e n a n c , f r o m J a n i c e Roberson, M e n t o r C o o r d i . n a t o r o C h e r y l P a r k m a n , Te a c h e r , K . W i g g i n s , R e c r e a t i o n S p e c i a l i s t , T. W i s o m a h , C o r r e c t i o n a l O f f i c e r , S . Z e h i r n i a k , C o r r e c t i o n a l O f f i c e r , a n d P. F e n d l e y , C o r r e c t i o n a l O f f i c o r 7 Memorandum t o J . M c C a r t y, C a p t a i n , f r o m N . C a r o , L i e u t e n a n t ; Memorandum f r o m H . H a m i l t o n . , C o r r e c t i o n a l O f f i c e r , t o L . R o g e r s , S I S T e c h n i c i a n ; a n d t h e rem/tied video o f t h e incident. E. C o n f i d e n t i a l i n f e r m a t i o n w a s u s e d b y ONO i n s u p p o r t o f h i s f i n d i n g s , b u t w a s n o t r e v e a l e d t o t h e i n m a t e . T h e c o n f i d e n t i a l i n f o r m a t i o n was documented i n a s e p a r a t e r e p o r t . T h e c o n f i d e n t i a l i n f o r m a t i o n has been ( c o n f i d e n t i a l i n f o r m a n t s have been) determined t o be r e l i a b l e because: N/A I V. F I N D I N G S O F T H E [ M O A. T h e a c t w a s c o m n i t t e d a s c h a r g e d . I. X S. T h e f o l l o w i n g a c t w a s c o m M i t t e d : 3 0 7 C. N o p r o h i b i t e d a c t w a s c o m m i t t e d : • V S P E C I F I C EVIDENCE R E L I E D ON T O SUPPORT F I N D I N G S ( P h y s i c a l e v i d e n c e , o b s e r v a t i o n s , w r i t t e n documents, e t c - ) I— * - ' T H I S WAS A REHEARING O F A N 1NCIDEN7 REPORT 2 6 0 9 3 8 9 , A'R1.-!TEN ON J U LY 2 4 , 2 3 1 4 , T H N : WAS K A R D I N j U L Y O F 2 0 1 4 , A N D WAS SUCCESSFULLY A P P E A L E D - The CHO f j n d s t h a t o n J u n e 1 7 , 2 0 1 4 , y o u c o m m i t t e d t h e p r o h i b i t e d a c t o f R e f u s i n g t o O b e y an O r d e r “ . : o d e 3 3 7 ) . The s p e c i f i c e v i d e n c e r e l i e d u p o n i n c l u d e s t h e w r i t t e n s t a t e m e n t o f t h e r e p o r t i n g o f f i c e r . O . A r r e l l a n o , S I S Te c h n i c i a n , s t a t e d , " I g a v e s e v e r a l O r d e r s f o r t h e i n m a t e s t o r e t u r n t o t h e i r c e l l s . T h e i n m a t e s moved t o t h e r i g h t s i d e o f t h e u n i t , b u t s t i l l refused t o r e p o r t t o t h e i r c e l l s . " You a p p e a r e d b e f o r e t h e DHO a n d t h e OHO r e a d t h e I n c i d e n t r e p o r t a l o u d t o y o u . Y o u t h e n stated, " T a d m i t t o r e f u s i n g an o r d e r, b u t deny committing any o t h e r p r o h i b i t e d a c t . ' The OHO c o n s i d e r e d t h e w r i t t e n s t a t e m e n t o f t h e r e p o r t i n g o f f i c e r a n d y o u r o w n a d m i s s i o n o f g u i l t . T h e r e f o r e , b a s e d o n t h e e v i d e n c e o u t l i n e d a b o v e , t h e OHO f i n d s t h e g r e a t e r weight o f t h e e v i d e n c e t o s u p p o r t y o u c o m m i t t e d t h e p r o h i b i t e d a c t o f R e f u s i n g t o Obey a n Order (Code 307) Any d e : a y i n p r e p a r a t i o n a n d d e l i v e r y o f t h i s p a c k e t w a s a r e s u l t o f l e a v e , t r a i n i n g , docket s c h e d u l i n g and normal d u t y assignment. A n y d e l a y i n d e l i v e r y does n o t a f f e c t y o u r rights, g r a n t e d under t h e inmate d i s c i p l i n e process I n regards t o appeal. Page 2 of 3 BOP 2016-03828 170 of 175 /alb, " E R N /11IN tdowa., DISCIPLINE HEARING OFFICER REPORT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BP-S305.052 M AY 94 FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS V I . SANCTICN OR ACTION TAKEN 30 DAYS V I S I T I N G , E M A I L RESTRICTION, TELEPHONE & COMMISSARY RESTRICTION (S.USPENDED PENDING 6 0 DAYS O E CLEAR CONDUCT( V I I . REASON FOR SANCTION O R ACTION TAKEN The a c t i o n / b e h a v i o r o n t h e p a r t o f a n y i n m a t e t o r e f u s e t o o b e y a n o r d e r o f a s t a f f member p o s e s a s e r i o u s t h r e a t t o t h e a b i l i t y o f t h e s t a f f m e m b e r t o c a r r y o u t t h e i r assigned d u t i e s , a n d t o e f f e c t i v e l y deal w i t h a l l o r h e r Inmates p l a c e d under t h e i r s e p e r v i s i o n / r e s p o n s L b i l i t y . T h e s a n o t e n ( s ) i m p o s e d b y t h e PRO w e r e t a k e n t o l e t t h e Inmate k n o w t h a t h e , a n d h e a l o n e , w i l l b e h e l d r e s p o n s i b l e f o r h i s a c t i o n s / b e h a v i o r , To h o l d y o u a c c o u n t a b l e , t h e DEO s a n c t i o n e d y o u t o L o s s o f V i s i t i n g , E m a i l , Te l e p h o n e a n d Commissary f o r 3 0 d a y s ( s u s p e n d e d p e n d i n g 6 0 d a y s o f c l e a r c o n d u c t ) . The s u s p e n d e d l o s s o f p r i v i l e g e s w e r e i m p o s e d a s a c e t o r r e n t f r o m f u t u r e r u l e v i o l a t i o n s . t i s t h e h o p e o f t h e CHO t h a t t h e s e s a n c t i o n s ( i m m e d i a t e a n d s u s p e n d e d ) w i l l s e r v e t o deter you from f u t u r e rIsconduct. V I I I . APPEAL RIGHTS: T h e i n m a t e h a s b e e n a d v i s e d o f t h e f i n e l n g s , s p e c i f i c e v i d e n c e relied on, a c t i o n and reasons f o r t h e action. T h e inmate has been advised o f h i s r i g h t t o a p p e a l t h i s a c t i o n w i t h i n 2 0 c a l e n d a r d a y s u n d e r t h e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e Remedy P r o c e d u r e . A copy o f t h i s r e p o r t has been gLven t o t h e inmate. Yes j x —TN° I X . D I S C I P L I N E HEARING OFFICER P r i n t e d Name o f DHO Date g n a c u r e o f OHO Irr . R U I Z , A l t e r n a t e DHO DATE Report d e i v o r e d t o i n m a t e b y : ( T h i s f o r m m a y b e r e p l i c a t e d i n WP) 5/ t3 k TIME Replaces B F - 3 0 4 ( 5 2 o f JAN ES Page 3 of 3 BOP 2016-03828 171 of 175 BP-A0308 A D M I N I S T R A T I V E D E T E N T I O N ORDER Aug u U . S . D E PA R T M E N T O F J U S T I C E FEDERAL BUREAU O F P R I S O N S F. C . I . T h r e e R i v e r s , Te x a s Institution Date/Time: 1 - 2 7 - 2 0 1 6 7 : 3 0 PM TO: S p e c i a l H o u s i n g J r FROM: F . Brow L i e u ant (Name/Title SUBJECT : P l a c e m e n t o f B r o w n , B a r r e t t ( a ) I (b) ( c ) s I s I s , Reg. No. 45047-177 , i n Administrative Detention pendinga hearingf o r a violationo f Bureauregulations; pending investigation o f a v i o l a t i o n of Bureau regulations; pendinginvestigationo r t r i a l f o r A criminala c t ; (d) I s 1 1 t o be admitted t o Administrative Detention 1 S i n c e t h e inmateh a s requestedadmissionf o r protection; I h e r e b y r e q u e s t placement i n A d m i n i s t r a t i v e D e t e n t i o n t o : my own p r o t e c t i o n . Instate S i g n a t u r e / R e g i s t e r N o . : S t a f f W i t n e s s P r i n t e d Name S i g n a t u r e : ( 2 ) S i n c e a serioust h r e a t e x i s t s t o individual'ss a f e t y a s perceivedb y s t a f f , althoughperson has n e t r e q u e s t e d a d m i s s i o n ; r e f e r r a l o f t h e n e c e s s a r y i n f o r m a t i o n w i l l b e f o r w a r d e d t o t h e UDC/DHO f o r a p p r o p r i a t e h e a r i n g . ( e ) I s pendingtransfero r i s i n holdoverstatusd u r i n g transfer. ( f ) I s pendingclassification;o r ( g ) I S terminatingconfinementi n DisciplinarySegregationa n d h a s beenorderedI n t o Administrative Detention b y t h e Warden's d e s i g n e e . It i s t h i s Correctional Supervisor's decision based o n a l l t h e circumstances t h a t continued presence i n t h e general population poses a s e r i o u s t h r e a t t o or t o t h e s e c u r i t y o r o r d e r l y r u n n i n g o f t h e i n s t i t u t i o n because t h e l i f e , p r o p e r t y, s e l f , above named innate's staff, o t h e r inmates, Yo u h a v e b e e n p l a c e d i n t o A d m i n i s t r a t i v e D e t e n t i o n p e n d i n g a n S / S I n v e s t i g a t i o n . Therefore, t h e above named i n m a t e i s t o b e p l a c e d i n A d m i n i s t r a t i v e D e t e n t i o n u n t i l f u r t h e r n o t i c e . T h e i n m a t e received a copy o f t h i s Order on (date / t i m e ; 1 - 2 7 - 2 0 1 6 / 7 : 3 0 PM S t a f f W i t n e s s S i g n a t u l e / P r i n t e d Name P . L o p e z , S I S T e c h D • I n t h e c a s e o f OHO a c t i o n , r e f e r e n c e t o t h a t c r u e t i s s u f f i c i e n t . a I n t e 1-27-2016 other cases, the Correctional supervisor w i l l make a n i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w a n d d e c i s i o n , w h i c h i s documented h e r e . Record Copy - I n n a t e Concerned ( n o t n e c e s s a r y i f p l a c e m e n t i s a r e s u l t o f holdover status); Copy - Captain; Copy - Unit Manager; Copy - Operation Supervisor - A d m i n i s t r a t i v e Detention U n i t : Copy - C e n t r a l F i l e PDF Prescribed b y P5270 ( R e p l a c e s BOP 2016-03828 172 of 175 B F - 3 0 8 ( 5 2 ) o f JAN 1 9 5 0 . ) SPECIAL HOUSING UNIT RULES & REGULATIONS F.C.I. T H R E E RIVERS, TEXAS 1. B e d s are to be made each morning by 7:30 A.M. A f t e r the bed is made you may lay on it and cover with a sheet. 2. 3. 4. 5. T o w e l s and sheets will not be used as a floor covering or rug. N o t h i n g is to be hung on the cell door, beds or on the walls. N o t h i n g will be thrown out of the cell onto the range floor. T h e telephone monitoring notice will be left on the telephone. Social calls will not exceed 15 minutes and will be allowed as follows: One call per every 30 days for inmates in Administrative Detention status and Disciplinary Segregation status. Additional calls must be approved by the SHU Lieutenant. A l l legal calls will be processed by the appropriate Unit Teams. 6. N o t h i n g is to be stored on the window sill. Items will be stored under the desk. 7. N o t h i n g will be attached or taped to the walls. There will be no graffiti or writing on the walls. 8 S a n i t a t i o n standards will be maintained at the highest level. Cells will be kept clean and neat at all times. 9. A l l use of tobacco products is prohibited while assigned to the Special Housing Unit. 10. N o t h i n g is allowed to be taken to the recreation/exercise yard. 11. Y e l l i n g or any other disruptive behavior will not be tolerated. 12. A Request to a Staff Member (Cop-Out), is to be submitted for use of the Law Library and haircuts from the barber. These will be handled on a first come first serve basis. 13. A l l inmates scheduled for release from the Special Housing Unit will not be released until the cell he is housed in has been properly cleaned. T h i s will be determined by the S.H.U. Staff. *****SHOULD ANY CLOTHING ITEMS OR BED LINEN BE USED TO MAKE FISHING LINES OR USE TO HANG IN WINDOWS YOU WILL RECEIVE AN INCIDENT REPORT FOR DESTRUCTION OF GOVT, PROPERTY, BE CHARGED FOR THE ITEM, AND PLACED ON PAPER SHEETS FOR A o f t - liwn.I'V, y-AtiNc.S.A PERIOD OF 5 DAYS.************ i n C ( 1 - Z o 1?.0-C14 r 1111 e INMATE NAME: c l ) f t 7 L 0 INMATES SIGNATURE ' D r W A OFFICERS PRINTED NAME S I G N AT U R E . R e g Number: L i 5 0 9 7 - 1 7 T E / TIME: / 7 7 ( 2 - 0 7 2 - 0 - 9 1 ) C By signing above, I acknowledge I have received a copy of the Rules and Regulations of the Special Housing Unit. I understand that an), violation of these Rules or Regulations ma), result in disciplinary action taken against me. BOP 2016-03828 173 of 175 FCI Three Rivers, Texas SPECIAL HOUSING CELL INSPECTION SHEET TO BE COMPLETED UPON PLACEMENT IN ANY CELL AND INCLUDED IN THE INMATES FILE. CELL: 3 W & IA) D INMATE PRINTED: C?,--c A T X MATTRESS X TOILET X SINK X WINDOW X SHOWER X LIGHT X DOOR X WALLS X SPRINKLER X : / Z I N M A T E S SIGNATURE: L A GOOD D A M A G E D BLINK E W O R K ORDER ITT DESCRIPTION OF DAMAGE MEDICAL NOTIFIED BY: OTHER INMATES IN CELL: /1-ftielrf COMMENTS: INSPECTING OFFICER: PR T E D NAME I G N A BOP 2016-03828 174 of 175 T U R E sum as: mu 1* SPECIAL HOUSING UNIT RECORD A DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS maze RIVERS mm NM. New. emu--n LANCASTE YumICImlur_ mum 0' Reason: PENDING A4 mm. mm" H. TARANGO Dm: mm mm Pun-u NONE Walton mmqu Suecul > I: sun-pun: Dub-(ac, swoon, mm". Me-msn, Sinner . mm Exams: EnherclullT'm paw m. a 0mm a mum) NM: am no OUT) will flan Ihrumh 5 mn uy m: PA. . mmu'n. nu mam: mm mm a. mm has! um: um my a, In. PhysaInAs-Lsunl cum-mm- Wham comma": on mm so. muwncuu. Gila. 5mm; and nm 010 Similar! mc mun nan .n reca'd um: um mm (05C . Unllomur) Th: lurm enema and January was EDP 2016703828 175 of 175