Reardon, Patricia A DOA From: - Hynek, Sara DOA . Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:56 AM Sent: To: Schwanz, Nathan - DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW So are things like meeting state workforce needs in the mission, as opposed to responsibilities? Otherwise, generally, 1 agree we should draft based on UWHCA, and give Eric 3 list of guessing they?ll need to go back to Gov, but at least we?ll have it ready. From: SchWanz, ?Nathan DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:49 AM To: Hynek, Sara DOA Subject: RE:'Questions regarding UW A lot of the powers of the Board will?be removed per the instructions I have already given Mark. It?s things like appointments to parking fees and nursing programs at Point. in my opinion, the powers and responsibilities of the Board should be similar to it has basic powers to do whatever it needs to, to issue bonds, employ people, etc. The responsibilities require them to create a personnel system, enter a lease agreement, establish a budget, get liability insurance, etc. But I think ES should sign off those decisions. We could direct the draftens-to-start drafting it?after-the UWHCA though. To powers and responsibilities are broad yet specific, which is what ES wanted. Nathan From: Hynek,- Sara DOA. sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:37 AM To: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW Without getting into each of the items, is there a way to phrase it as a general question? Or is that something that maybe we put together what we think it should look like, and then ask Eric to ratify? From: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:31 AM To: Hynek, Sara DOA Subject: FW: Questions regarding UW idon?t think the employees question needs to be brought up next week, since i think it is pretty clear what they want to do there. . . lam thinking of adding the other question to the document for Eric. Do you agree? Nathan From: Kunkel, Mark Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 4:56 PM To: Schwanz, Nathan DOA 0001 Cc: Champagne, Rick Hanaman, Cathiene Gary, Aaron LEGIS Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW One issue would be the treatment of UW employees. Currently, we are creating an authority and transferring the employees to the authority. Is that going to be okay? More generally, we will need guidance on how to deai with the powers and duties ofthe UW specified in ch. 36. You?ve given me some guidance on 55. 36.09 to 36.21, but we?will need clarification on what to do with the rest of ch. 36. As for other questions, i?m sure we?ll have plenty, butthey wili depend on what you ultimater decide to do. Howeyer, if we think of anything else this week, we?ll get'ln touch. ark .yw- H-r From: n2, Nathan DOA Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 1:58 PM To: Kunkel, Mark Subject: Questions regarding UW Hi Mark, We have a meeting next week with the Goy?s office and some staff from the UW. Do you have any questions or topics - .we shouldbring up toget directionxon? ltso,.couid yousendthernto mgby?riday. found out today. if you don?t have anything for us to bring up, that?s fine. Thanks. - Nathan Schwanz Executive Policy Budget Analyst State Budget Office 608-2662 843 0002 Reardon, Patricia A DOA - . From! A SchWanz, Nathan DOA . Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:58 AM Sent: Hynek, Sara DOA To: Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW I?ve already asked Mark to update the mission with the. added focus on the state?s workforce needs. lwill have Mark craft the powers and responsibilities similar to Did you hear back from Jenny or Mickie with any questions to add to the list? I would like to send to Michael and Kirsten today. Nathan - From: Hynek, Sara - DOA . Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:56 AM i To: schwanz, Nathan - DOA . Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW So are things like meeting state workforce needs in the mission, as opposed to responsibilities? Otherwise, generally, i agree we should draft based on UWHCA, and give Eric a list of guessing - they?ll need to go back to Gov, but at least we?ll have it ready. From: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:49 AM To: Hynek, Sara DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW A lot of the powers of the Board will be removed per the instructions I have already given Mark. It?s things like appointments to parking fees and nursing programs at Point. in my opinion, the powers and responsibilities of the Board should be similar to it has basic powers to do whatever it needs to, to issue bonds, employ people, etc. The responsibilities require them to create a personnel system, enter a lease agreement, establish a budget, get liability insurance, etc. But i think ES should sign off those decisions. We could direct the drafters to start drafting it afterthe UWHCA though. To me, powers and responsibilities are broad yet specific, which is what ES wanted. Nathan From: Hynek, Sara DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:37 AM To: Nathan DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW Without getting into each of the items, is there a way to phrase it as a general question? Or is that something that maybe we put together what we think it should look like, and then ask Eric to ratify? From: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:31 AM 0003 To: Hynek, Sara DOA Subject: FW: Questions regarding UW i don?t think the employees question needs to be brought up next week, since I think it is pretty clear what they want to do there. i am thinking of adding the other question to the document for Eric. Do you agree? Nathan From: Kunkel, Mark Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 4:56 PM To: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Cc: Champagne, Rick Ha naman, Cathlene Gary, Aaron LEGIS Subject: RE: Questions regarding_UW - One issue would be the treatment of UW employees. Currently, we are creating an authority and transferring the employees to the authority. -is that going to be okay? More generally, we wifl need guidance on how to deal with the powers and duties of the UW specified in ch. 36. Yo u?ye given me some guidance on 35. 36.09 to 36.21, but we will need clarification on what to do with the rest of ch. '36. - As for other questions, sure we?ll have plenty, but they wilidep?end on what you ultimately decide to do. HoweVer, if'we think of anything else this week, we?il get in touch. "Mark? From: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Sent: Mohday,?December 29, 2014 1:58 PM To: {(unkel, Mark Subjecti Questions regarding UW Hi Mark, . of?ce and some staff from the UW. Do you have any questions or topics We have a meeting next week with the Gov?s we should bring up to get direction on? if so, could you send them to me by Friday. i know it?s short notice; we just found out today. if you don?t have anything for us to bring up, that?s fine. Thanks. Nathan Schwartz Executive Policy Budget Analyst State Budget. Of?ce 60894662843 0004 Reardon, Patricia A DOA Hynek, Sara DOA From: Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:57 AM To: Schwanz, Nathan Heifetz, Michael - DOA Cc: Grinde, Kirsten DOA Subject: RE: Topics of Discussion for next week Will be here Friday. I?d these are fairly short lists. We both were remarking yesterday that it seems like it should be more complicated, but perhaps it?s not because the Gay?s office is driving the process this time, and we are doing a wholesale ?conscious uncoupling?, the issues seem a bit more clear out But if we?re totally missing something, let us know. Nathan also is putting together a document that simply shows the mission, responsibilities, duties, and powers that we are drafting for Eric?s review. From: Schwanz, Nathan DOA. Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:53 AM To: Heifetz, Michael (3 Hynek, Sara DOA Co: Grinde, Kirsten DOA I Subject: RE: Topics of Discussion for next week . i wasn?t planning on being here but can be if needed. Nathan From: Heifetz, Michael - DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:44 AM To: Schwanz, Nathan Hynek, Sara DOA Cc: Grinde, Kirsten DOA Subject: RE: Topics of Discussion for next week Thx. i will try to get further clarity from Eric regarding the structure/format and desired outcomes of this meeting. That may not occurtil Monday. Are both of you planning to be in the office on Friday? From: Schwanz, Nathan - DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:29 AM To: Heifetz, Michael - Grinde, Kirsten - DOA Co: Hynek, Sara DOA Subject: Topics of Discussion for next week Michael and Kirsten, Attached are two separate documents containing questions regarding the UW authority; one specific for Eric and the Gov?s office and one to guide our discussion next Wednesday. Piease review and let me know if there is anythingyou think should be added or ifthere are any corrections that need to be made. Let me know if you have any questions regarding either document. Thank you for your time. 0005 Nathan Shhwanz EXecutive Policy 86 Budget Analyst State Budget Of?ce 6084662343 0006 Reardon, Patricia DOA From: Hynelc, Sara - DOA Tuesday, December 30,. 2014 11:59 AM Sent: Schwanz, Nathan DOA To: Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW Sounds good. Sorry, i already promised a list of mission etc. Can you create that list, too? Maybe we can send along? From: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:58 AM To: Hynek, Sara - DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW l?ve already asked Mark to update the mission with the added focus on the state?s workforce needs. l'wili have mark craft the powers and responsibilities similar to Did you hear back from Jenny or Mickie with any questions to add to the list? i would like to send to Michael and Kirsten today; Nathan From: Hynek, Sara DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:56 AM To: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW So are things like meeting state workforce needs in the mission, as opposed to responsibilities? Otherwise, generally, i agree ?we should draft based on UWHCA, a nd give Eric a list of guessing they?il need to go back to Gov, but at least we?ll have it ready. From: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 1039 AM To: Hynek, Sara DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW A lot of the powers of the Board will be removed per the instrUCtions have already given Mark. It?s things like appointments to parking fees and nursing programs at Point. in my opinion; the powers and responsibilities ofthe Board should be similar to it has basic powers to do whatever it needs to, to issue bonds, employ people, etc. The responsibilities require them to create a personnel system, enter a lease agreement, establish a budget, get liability insurance, etc. But lthink ES should sign offthose decisions. We could direct the drafters to start drafting it after the UWHCA though. To me, powers and responsibilities are broad yet specific, which is what ES wanted. Nathan 0007 From: Hynek, Sara DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:37 AM To: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW Without getting into each ofthe items, is there a way to phrase it as a general question? Or is that something that maybe we put together what we think it should look like, and then ask Eric to ratify? From: Schwanz, Nathan JDOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:31 AM To: l-lynek, Sara DOA Subject: FW: Questions regarding UW i don?t think the employees question needs to be brought up next Week, since i think it is pretty clear what they want to do there. i am thinking of adding the other question to the document for Eric. Do you agree? Nathan From: Kunkel, Mark Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 4:56 PM To: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Cc: Champagne, Rick Hanama n, Cathlene Gary, Aaron LEGIS Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW One issue would be the treatment of UW employees. Currently, we are creating an authority and transferring the employees to the authority. is that going to be okay? More generally, we will need guidance on how to dead with the powers and duties ofthe UW specified in ch. 36. You?ve giyen me some guidance on 55. 35.09 to 36.21, but we will need clarification on what to do with the rest of ch. 36. As for other questions, I?m sure we?ll have plenty, but they will depend on what you uiti?mately decide to do. However, if we think of anything eise this week, we?ll get in touch. ~~Mark n. -- . .W. hr!. 5 From: Schwanz, Nathan DOA [mailto:Nathan,Schwa nz@wisconsin.gov] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 1:58 PM To: Kunkel, Mark Subject: Questions regarding UW Hi Mark, . We have a meeting next week with the Gov?s office and some staff from the UW. Do you have any questions or topics we should bring up to get direction on? If so, couid you send them to me by Friday.?i know it?s short notice; we just found out today. If you don?t have anything for us to bring up, that?s fine. Thanks. Nathan Schwanz Executive Policy 85 Budget Analyst State Budget Of?ce 0008 608-266-2843 0009 WE Reardon, Patricia A DOA From: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Tuesday, December 30, 2014 12:00 PM Sent To: l-lynek, Sara DOA RE: Questions regarding UW Subject: was going to say, didn?t know i was working on that. Haha Should be no problem to develop. Should i also send a similar list to Mark so they can work off that orjust wait to hear from Eric? Also, Mark is wondering about other aspects of ch. 36, pretty much everything after ch. 36.21. Should i direct him with our recommendations until we hear otherwise from Eric? Nathan From: Hynek, Sara DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:59 AM To: Schwanz, Nathan - DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW Soundsgood. Sorry, i already promised a list'of mission etc. Q9 Can you create that list, too? Maybe we can send along. From: Schwanz, Nathan - DOA . Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:58 AM To: Hynek, Sara DOA - Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW. We already asked Mark to update the mission with the added focus on the state?s workforce needs. lwiil have Mark craft the powers and responsibilities similar to Did you hear back from Jenny or Mickie with any questions to add to the list? I would iike to send to Michaei and Kirsten today. Nathan From: Hynek, Sara - DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:56 AM To: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding Um! I So are things like meeting state workforce needs in'the mission, as opposed to responsibilities? Otherwise, generally, agree we should draft based on UWHCA, and give Eric a list of guessing they?ll need to go back to Gov, but at least we?li have it ready. From: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:49 AM 0010 To: Hynek, Sara - DOA Subject: RE: Questionsregarding UWthe powers of the Board willbe removed per the instructions I have already given Mark. It?s things like appointments to parking fees and nursing programs at Point. In my opinion, the powers and responsibilities of the Board should be similarto it has basic pdwers to do whatever it needs to, to issue bonds, employ people, etc. The responsibilities require them to create a personnel system, enter a lease agreement, establish a budget, get liability insurance, etc. But] think ES should sign off those decisions. We could direct the drafters to start drafting it after the UWHCA though. To me, powers and - responsibilities are broad yet specific, which is what ES wantedi. Nathan From: Hynek,? Sara DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:37 AM To: Schwanz, Nathan - DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW Without getting into each of the items, is there a way to phrase it as a general question? Or is that something that maybe we put together what we think it should look like, and then ask Eric to ratify? From: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:31 AM To: Hynek, Sara DOA Subject: FW: Questions regarding UW i don?t think the employees question needs to be brought up next week, since i think it is pretty clear what they want to do there. i am thinking of adding the other question to the document for Eric. Do you agree? Nathan From: Kunkel, Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 4:56 PM To: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Cc: Champagne, Rick Hanaman, Cathlene Gary, Aaron LEGIS Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW One issue would be the treatment of UW employees. Currently, we are creating an authority and transferring the employees to the authority. is that going to be okay? More generally, we will need guidance on how to deal with the powers and duties of the UW specified in ch. 36. You?ve given me some guidance on 55. 36.09 to 36.21, but we will need clarification on what to do with the rest of ch. 36. As for other questions, i?m sure we?ll have plenty, but they will depend on what you ultimately decide to do. However, if we think of anything else this week, we?ll get in touch. --iViark 0011 1 4.. . (tuna g, Hm?, Jl?xkd e. uu-auw..m-u. .v ?qt-r. muggy-u. n. a From: Schwenz, Nathan lid/3L Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 1:58 PM To: Kunkel, Mark Subject: Questions regarding UW Hi Mark, - We have a meeting next week with the Gov?s office and some staff from the UW. Do you have any questions or topics we should bring up to get direction on? if so, could you send them to me by Friday. I know it?s short notice; we just - found out today. lfyou don?t have anything for us to bring up, that?s fine. Thanks. Nathan Schwanz EXecutive Policy 85 Budget Analyst State. Budget Office . 608?266-2843 0012 Reardon, Patricia A DOA From: Hynek, Sara DOA Tuesday, December 30, 2014 12:01 PM sent: To: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW Mark could probably just work off But I suppose if you?re making a fist based on that too, it might be?easier for him. Yes, that sounds good re: Ch. 36. From: Schwanz, Nathan - DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 12:00 PM To: Hynek, Sara - DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW 1 was going to say, didn?t know I was working on that. Haha Should be no problem to develop. Should i also send a similar list to Mark so they can work off that or just wait to hear from Eric? Also, Mark is wondering about other aspects of ch. 36, pretty much everything after ch. 36.21. Should I direct him with our recommendations until we hear otherwise from Eric? - Nathan From: Hynek, Sara - DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:59 AM To: Schwa nz, Nathan DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW Sounds good. Sorry, i already promised a list of mission etc. 69 Can you create that list, too? Maybe we can send along. From: Schwanz, Nathan - DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:58 AM To: Hynek, Sara DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW We already asked Mark to update the mission with the added focus on the state?s workforce needs. I will have Mark craft the powers and responsibilities similar to Did you hear back from ienny or Mickie with any questions to add to the list? i would like to send to Michael and Kirsten today. - Nathan 0013 From: Hynek, Sara DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:50 AM To: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW So are things like meeting state workforce needs in the mission, as opposed to responsibilities? Otherwise, generally, 1 agree we should draft based on UWHCA, and give Eric a list of guessing they?ll need to go back to Gov, but at least we?li have it ready. 'F'rom: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:49 AM To: Hynek, Sara DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW A lot of the powers of the Board will be removed per the instructions have already given Mark. it?sthings like appointments to parking fees and nursing programs at Point. in my opinion, the powers and responsibilities of the Board should be similar to it has basic powers to do whatever it needs to, to issue bonds, employ people, etc. The responsibilities require them to create a personnel system, enter a lease agreement, establish a budget, get liability insurance, etc. But i think ES should sign off those decisions. We could direct the drafters to Start drafting it after the UWHCA though. To me, powers and responsibilities are broad yet specific, which is what ES wanted. Nathan From: Hynek, Sara DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:37 AM To: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW Without getting into each of the items, is there a way to phrase it as a general question? Or is that something that maybe we put together what we think it should, look iike, and then ask Eric to ratify? From: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:31 AM To: Hynek, Sara a DOA I Subject: FW: Questions regarding UW i don?t think the employees question needs to be brought up next week, since i think it is pretty ciear what they want to do there. I am thinking of adding the other question to the document for Eric. Do you agree? Nathan From: Kunkei, Mark Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 4:56 PM To: Schwanz, Nathan DOA I Cc: Champagne, Rick Hanaman, Cathiene Gary, Aaron LEGIS Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW One issue would be the treatment of UW employees. Currently, we are creating an authority and transferring the empioyees to the authority. is that going to be okay? 0014 More generally, we: will need guidance on how to deal with the powers and duties 'of the UW specified in ch. 36. You?ve given me some guidance on 55. 36.09 to 36.21, but we will need clarification on what to do with the rest of ch. 36. i As for other questions, l?m sure we?ll have plenty, but they will depend on what you ultimately decide to do. However, ifwe think ofanything else this week, we?ll get in touch. a rk . . ?pun-u- Hm than.Schwanz@wlsconsin.gov] HaulFrom: Schwanz, Nathan DOA [mailto:Na Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 1:58 PM To: Kunkel, Mark 4 Subject: Questions regarding UW Hi Mark, We have a meeting next Week with the Gov?s office and some staff from the UW. Do you have any questions or topics we should bring up to get direction on? if so, could you send them to me by Friday. i know it?s short notice; we just found out today- If you don?t have anything for us to bring up, that?s fine. Thanks. Nathan Schwanz Executive Policy Budget Analyst State Budget Of?ce 608266?2843 . 0015 Schwanz, Nathan DOA From Sent Tuesday, December 30, 2014 12:02 PM To: Hynek, Sara - DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW Well, i already told Mark that about UWHCA re the duties and responsibilities, so maybe a list will make it more clear for him. Nathan From: Hynek, Sara DOA . Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 12:01 PM To: Schwanz, Nathan - DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW Mark could probabiyjust work off But i suppose if you?re making a list based on that too, it might be easier for him. Yes, that sounds good re: Ch. 36. From: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 12:00 PM To: Hynek, Sara DOA Subject: Questions regarding UW was going to say, didn?t know i was working on that. Haha Should be no problem to deyeiop. Should i also send a similar list to Mark so they can work off that or just wait to hear from Eric? Also, Mark is wondering about other aspects of ch. 36, pretty much everything after ch. 36.21. Should I direct him with our recommendations until we hear otherwise from Eric? 1 Nathan From: Hynek, Sara DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:59 AM To: SchWanz, Nathan DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW Sounds good. Sorry, i already promised a list of mission etc. Can you create that list, too? Maybe we can send along. From: Schwanz, Nathan - DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:58 AM To: Hynek, Sara DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW i 0016 I?ve already asked Mark to update the mission with the added focus on the state?s workforce needs. I will have Mark craft the poWers and responsibilities similar to Did you hear back from Jenny or Mickie with any questions to add to the list? i would like to send to Michael and Kirsten today. Nathan From: Hynek, Sara DOA - Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:56 AM To: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW So are things like meeting state workforce needs in the mission, as opposed to responsibilities? Otherwise, generally, I agree h- we should draft based on UWHCA, and give Eric a list of - guessing they?ll need to go back to Gov, but at least we?ll have it ready. From: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:49 AM To: Hynek, Sara DOA . Subject: RE: Questions regarding UW A lot of the powers of the Board will be removed per the instructions I have aiready given Mark. it?s things like appointments to parking fees and nursing programs at Point. 1 In my opinion the powers and responsibilities of the Boa rd should be similar to It has basic powers to do whatever it needs to, to issue bonds, employ people, etc. The responsibilities require them to create a personnel system, enter a lease agreement, establish a budget, get liability insurance, etc. But i think ES should sign off those decisions. We could direct the drafters to-start drafting it after the UWHCA though. To me, powers and responsibilities are broad yet speci?c, which is what ES wanted. Nathan From: l-lynek, Sara DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:37 AM To: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Subject: RE: Questions regarding Without getting into each of the items, is there a way to phrase it as a general question? Or is that something that maybe we put together what we think it should look like, and then ask Eric to ratify? . From: Schwanz, Nathan DOA Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:31 AM To: Hynek, Sara DOA Subject: FW: Questions regarding UW I don?t think the employees question needs to be brought up ne5328: 3mm 81:33 2.. man ism a Ox. swam Ew 926 :mem .8 33:33 3 . m: $233 02? 02.5., cozamzm 3 9mm. Emaacs?r <.mm I 383033 ?macm? 33 $5 Kaunas 23.9: SE 92m :mem 3 Swag: ?68$ 8 m: muuqo?wm 9% 2:9. wosamsm <8 I 38803.8 33 $6 13?. 0043 - p.70, in this biennium. 25.50l3m) lines L4 p.71. Retain existing law exemption, currently removed on p. 70, lines 3~4 Clarification nee??idi'id??hxat retains - stasis-3:312; autonomy rurs?igzunds. r. I Does useg?ggvgord euthanasia In this seel??itaccomplish arise?? - "see exemption from Checking to see if this is necessary. 3601(1) lines 19- 23 10- 7'52 Add language to end of . paragraph that reads "except for revenue from auxiliary operatie?r?ts .9.) 1, . . Lifts-e ens-e: contained in Funds 128 228 "ates-tit? it? .25 uni-NT ~21; 1mg Retamst?aeh mana of UW ment abilit?? Yet to be determined. ram. 3. see line 2?3.5 . . . . . haves; 51: . . In com Eb;ng I'tl CID ate In the: Proposed language for this >34 . b- 4* Km egtsl?segehping air .?Qiz-iaig language l?n? section is outlined below: I .- 3601 . seepage-s ?eat-2333? . ?sets There created "a-sseate systems; . seem. . age of higher education :soMided a l'e? . wetter-z . ?ass-ass? UnIMe-erv of ?Feminism email-tear Harvey . sas- ages?itbzagelggrounds ands?llf?f?fs?els 015?s 1 La search tor-??hfg?t?ledge individual deve?il?zpignent; stresses undergraidi?iage as its main prioriti?i?ije selected professional and research programs with emphasis on state and national shouldg?r?: . giggly as 'bkee?hgre reful an d:eqe?tp?tive langu??g??b create th?"System. mThe language is frequently quoted. 5 diligx'ff u. the authteiratiz-?st?ecbe knxo??v?t?i??eas-rt it ?91: . pu$i?5ee of the System [5 largelmchanged, this language .. :main unchanged, as well. :f Deny Have added language to make clear constitutional compliance. The Gov requested a simplified and clearer mission and purpose statements. The Board of Regents is free to adopt any additionai statements of mission or purpose. 0044 3601(2) p. 75, needs; which fosters diversity 0t educationai opportunity; .which promotes service to the public; . which makes effective and ef?cient use of human and physical resources; which functions cooperatively with other educational institutions and systems; and which promotes internal coo rdin and the wisest possibie use of resources. The principal office and one unrvermty?gg?lgx??hgegiy . ?23: i, prowded form .4 :1 ?5'35 I is . - \??w?eqfw 5-6-2. ?Elf-5.. 53W x. -blf?qlx'} line 17- 25 Pr?? Asis'?d Iangua sect 6217213215 a aging EN hi ?Eggs The misi- It} A..- tithe system?ifs?lig - .. 3:1 . develop huma-fte?esources Egg-ii 5:33. Ste-3. meet the state? vii ?nkforcem? . . a needs, to discover axidt a? W. HQ, extend knowledge and its application beyond the stein 0 ML. the System is integral to the System?s operation is frequently cited. The sting language goes to the we. . W0. character and uniqueness ofthe ?353- state?s great University System. Deny See previous item. 0045 boundaries of its campuses and to serve and stimulate society by A geese? developing in students . heightened intellectual, cuitural, and humane sensitivities, Mfume-22? scienti?c, professional and technological expertise; and a sense 0f Purpose. inherent in this - broad mission are methods of instruction, research, extend ed'??se?gk ?training arid public service Kite designed to educate peeple and ?tees 3,33,: improve the humangeE?Eim-on. tic-n. ?ix-ease Rise x. . 3-51.34, h. .. Ah? j} . 35:5: k? Basxc to every puWei-3:33- system lS th ease; who truth?z?, "t 36.02 (.1) p. 76, 0046 zitl?cx?, . 11:15.3 . . . Delete words ?and Soverei'gragpqmumty preservation - - - 2,9 line 4, 4 to be ,eegmeiegent watl'i?sl?i?ep - .u - 19-20 ?he, 5.6., . a e?gghaienteez?i?rga I {El .2 News anguage for sees 'Esi?erm limits for students need to e%%add.ed. HAiso, smce the even~ numbered language was moved from Chapter 15, the end date of the other student could be addressed here, as well. - p. 76, line 12? . in: p. 77, governor for?Psrifsiieer terms. same line 2 students shall begiairolled?ifgsl; h?lf?time and in "standing at institution University of Wisconsin System Wheaee and shall be residents of Deny Adding "and politic" will not preserve soyereign immunity. Other statutory changes have been made to attempt to protect some sovereign immunity. Yes Will ,add clari??ation that the student members serve 2-year terms. ism arm 333 9a arm Amy U. meWm o: 23% 9" 3mg 33333 Ecumst BmSUmw Era mm mun Emma Mb Emma 1.5? gm Elms.? 9.94 mm 303 umqimmzm 16: gm . yam?? .rJ335.4% Umsm m: $9013: :6 cm csmEm .8 rm