- People v. Brock Allen Turner Case 81577162

Probation Report

 

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE I

STATE OF CALIFORNIA . JUN 02 2MB
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

 

PLAINTIFF, REPORT OF

PROBATION OFFICER
No.: E1577162

June 2, 2016

A. 
N. Atty.

VS.
BROCK ALLEN TURNER,

DEFENDANT,



 

99w

SENTENCING COURIH Honorable Aaron M. Persky

 

CHARGE: Count One, section 220(a)(l} of the Penal Code (Assault
with Intent to Commit Felony, Rape of an Intoxicated or
Unconscious Person)

Count Two, Section 289(e) of the Penal Code (Sexual
Penetration when the Victim was Intoxicated)

Count Three, Section 289(d) of the Penal Code (Sexual

Penetration where the Victim was Unconscious of the
Nature of the Act)

PRIORS: None

 

PROBATION ELIGIBILITYI Limited pursuant to Section 1203.065(b)
- of the Penal Code 

DATE OF OFFENSE: January 18, 2015

 

DATE OF ARREST: January 18, 2015

 

CONVICTION: Found Guilty by Jury Trial on March 30, 2016

In the Case of BROCK ALLEN TURNER
Docket 31577162 June 2, 2016

CONDITIONS: None

REMAINING CHARGES: None

 

DAYS IN 1 actual day, 0 days 4019 PC, 1 total day;
1/18/15 bail.

 

 

AGE DATE OF BIRTH: 20; August 1, 1995; Kettering, Ohio

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:

 

The defendant is not eligible for sentencing pursuant to Section
1170(h) of the Penal Code.

Based on the defendant's age, the circumstances of arrest under
docket B1576943, and level of intoxication on the date of the
instant offense chemical testing and an order
prohibiting use of alcohol has been included.

The defendant is also.appearing today for Plea under docket
B1576943, for a violation of Section 25662(a) of the Business
and Professions Code, a misdemeanor (offense date: 11/15/14). In
light of the instant matter, it is suggested probation be denied
on this case. He has one actual day credit for time served.

SUMMARY OF OFFENSE:

The following is a summary based solely on the police report. A
request for all trial information was made.

According to Stanford University Department of Public Safety
report on January 18, 2015, at approximately 1:00
deputies responded to a 911 call regarding a female who
was unconscious, but breathing. As deputies approached the
student residential area of fraternity houses, they found the 22
year old victim lying on the ground, behind a dumpster. The
victim?s.dress was pulled up to her waist, exposing her vagina
and buttocks and she was not wearing underwear. Her bra was
pushed up above her left breast. The victim?s hair and clothing
were covered in pine needles from the surrounding area. Her
underwear was located on the ground approximately six inches
from the victim?s stomach.

In the Case of BROCK ALLEN TURNER
Docket 31577162 June 2, 2016

As deputies checked on the victim, an unknown male approached
them, stating they had ?him pinned down over there.? The male
pointed approximately 50 yards from the victim. He stated the
male subject he was referring to was ?mthe guy who did that,"
and pointed to the victim.

The victim was treated by paramedics and was transported to
Valley Medical Center. At the time of transport, she was still
unresponsive. At approximately 4:15 the victim regained
consciousness. A SART exam was conducted on the victim and she
provided deputies with a statement. She stated she went to
Stanford University campus earlier in the evening with her
sister and a friend. They went to one party and then later, went
to a party at Kappa Alpha fraternity house. While at the party,
she drank beer and at one point, had to use the bathroom. There
were no available restrooms in the house, so she walked outside
with her sister and friend and found an isolated area to urinate
before returning to the party. She did not remember being alone
with any males the entire night and did not remember any seXual
interaction. 

When the victim was interviewed again later, she admitted having
consumed several shots of whiskey and vodka prior to and/or
during the party. 

The victim?s sister reported attending the party at Kappa Alpha
fraternity house. At one point, she and the victim and the
victim?s friend, were outside the house, talking to a group of
males. One of the males, later determined to be the defendant,
was very aggressive, trying to kiss various females at the
party. When he approached the victim?s sister and started
kissing her, she pushed him away. Later, he attempted to kiss
her again, and again, she pushed him away. The victim?s sister
left the party to help a friend who drank too much alcohol. When
she returned to the party, the police were in the area. She
looked for her sister for one to one and half hours, but was
unsuccessful. 

The victim's friend stated she attended a party at Kappa Alpha
fraternity house, but she did not have any pertinent informatiOn
to report-

Officers reaponded to the area where the defendant was being
detained by two other males. The defendant emitted a strong odor
of alcohol and appeared to have an erect penis. The defendant
asked the deputies what they were doing and attempted to get up,
but was restrained and placed in handcuffs.

In the Case of BROCK ALLEN TURNER
Docket B1577l62 I June 2, 2016

Witnesses Jonsson and Arndt stated they were riding their
bicycles when movement behind a dumpster caught Jonsson?s eye.
He and Arndt saw the defendant on tOp of the female victim, who
was lying on her back. It looked like they were having sexual
intercourse, as he saw the defendant?s hips thrust several
times. Initially, Jonsson and Arndt thought it was a mutual
interaction, but then noticed the victim was not moving, so they
decided to make sure she was alright.

As they approached the defendant and victim, they yelled, ?hey?
to get the defendant's attention. He looked at them, got off the
victim, and ran away. Jonsson chased the defendant while Arndt
checked on the victim. Jonsson tripped the defendant and tackled
him to the ground when he attempted to get away. Arndt joined
him after seeing the victim was unconscious but breathing. Both
witnesses held the defendant down until the police arrived.

Two other witnesses,-Sinclair and Barnett, reported walking in
the area when they heard a commotion and saw what appeared to be
three males fighting on the ground. As they approached the
group, they saw Jonsson and Arndt trying to detain the
defendant. 

Two other witnesses, Bolton and Robbins, reported seeing the
victim lying on the ground near a dumpster. Bolton walked to the
victim and saw a male standing abova her, shining a light from
his cellular phone on her body. Bolton checked the victim?s
pulse, and when he looked up, the male was gone.

At 2525 agm., the defendant submitted a blood sample, which
yielded a blood alcohol content of At approximately 4:15
a SART exam was conducted on the defendant. -

The defendant, a Stanford University student, told deputies at
approximately 11:00 p.m. he attended a party at Kappa Alpha
fraternity. Throughout the night, he kissed a few girls.-Later'
in the evening, he went to the back of the fraternity house and
met the victim, who was drinking beer with another female. They
kissed for a while and then walked away from the house. They
ended up on the ground, where he removed the victim?s underwear.
He digitally penetrated the victim and kissed her for
approximately five minutes. He denied taking his pants off and
said his penis was never exposed. At some point, he started
feeling nauseOus and stood up to leave when he was tackled by a
group of males.

In the Case of BROOK ALLEN TURNER
Docket: 131577162 June 2, 2016

The defendant admitted consuming seven beers and a "Couple
swigs" cf fireball whiskey before meeting the victim. He stated
he had a good time with the victim and stated she seemed to
enjoy hie company,

On January 21, 2015, the Victim's sister and friend 
identified the defendant through a photo line-up.

On January 15, 2015, the defendant was arrested and was booked
into the main jail.

3 STATEMENT:

Correspondence has been sent to the victim(s) in this case
advising of the date, time, and place of sentencing, the right
to be present and to be heard pursuant to Section 1191v1 and
1191.2 of the Penal code, as well as requesting information
regarding any losses suffered.

On May 3, 2015, this officer spoke with Jane Doe. she will he
present in Court today and would like to address the court
regarding the impact of the crime.

The victim submitted a victim witness Claim for counseling
services and, an ambulance ride on the date of the instant
offense. According to Elizabeth Sanchez of the District Attorney
Restitution Services, the victim and her sister have active
restitution claim accounts, but have yet to submit actual bills
for their losses, Once bills are submitted, their claims will he
paid and restitution will be requested by the victim
Compensation and Government Claims Board.

Regarding sentencing, the victim stated, {1 still feel a lot cf
anger because of what he put me through at trial. I want him to
be sorry and express remorse. He attacked ny personal life in
whatever way possible and in the end, it didn't work. I don't
experience joy fron this, I don't feel like I won anythian It
was jus- the anger of hearing what he said in court. It was
devastating. I want him to know it hurt me, but I don't want his
life to be over. I want him to he punished, but as a human, I
just want him to get better. I don't want him to feel like his
life is over and I don't want him to rot away in jail; he
doesn't need to be behind bars."

In the Case of BROCK ALLEN TURNER
Docket 131577162 June 2, 2016

The victim further stated she would like the defendant to be
ordered to participate in counseling to ensure something like
-this never happens again. She also stated he makes her nervous
and she was hopeful he would not reside in the Bay Area._

STATEMENT: (Attached)

 

On May 9, 2016, this officer interviewed the defendant at the
Palo Alto probation office. He was provided with a Defendant
Statement of Assets form and was instructed to bring the
completed form to Court.

Regarding the instant offenses, the defendant stated he was at a
fraternity party with his friends and had consumed several beers
and whiskey shots. He explained, was very drunk. I met some 
peOple and eventually I got close with [the victim] at the I
party. We danced and kissed. Then I asked her if she wanted to
go back to my room with me. She agreed and we were walking back 
to my room and she Slipped on a slope behind a wooden shed and I
got down to the ground with her and we started kissing. I
thought we were in the heat of the moment and I asked her if she
wanted me to ?finger? her and she said yes. I just thought I
would take off her underwear and I ?fingered? her for a minute
and we were kissing and her arms were on my back. Then we were
just kissing and ?dry humping.? Then I got nauseous and I told
her I needed to throw up and I got up and started to walk away.
Some guy said something to me, but-I couldn?t really understand
what he was saying. I was disoriented and focused on throwing
up. He was talking to another guy in a foreign language, and
then they grabbed me and I ran away, but he tackled me.?

When asked about the victim?s wellbeing during the instant
offenses, the defendant stated, ?At no time did I see that she
was not responding. If at any time I thought she was not
reSponding, I would have stopped immediately.?

In the Case of BROOK ALLEN TURNER
Docket B1577162 June 2, 2016

Regarding the impact of his conduct, the defendant stated,
?Having imposed suffering on someone else and causing someone
else pain-I mean, I can barely live with myself. I can?t even
get out of bed in the morning. I think about it every second of
every day. Her [the victim] having to go through the justice 
system because of my actions justmit's unforgivable. If I really
wanted to get to know her,-I should have asked for her number,.
rather than asking her to go back to my room. Being drunk I just
couldn?t make the best decisions and neither could she. I
stupidly thought it was okay for me to do what everyone around
was doing, which was drinking. I was wrong."

The defendant further stated he was sorry for what he put the
victim and her family through during the trial. He explained,
?During the trial I didn?t want to victimize her at all. That
was just my attorney and his way of approaching the case. I
didn't want to degrade her in any way. I regret that. I never
meant to treat her like anything else than an exceptional
person. I?m sorry for her having to go thrOugh this entire
process and having to eVen think about this for a second, all
because of my actions that night. I wish I could just take it
back. I didn?t even deserve to talk with her, to interact with
her. I can?t believe I imposed such suffering on her and I?m so
sorry.?

Although he was uncertain of an appropriate sentence, the
defendant stated he was prepared to accept the decision of the
Court and would comply with any Court orders. If granted
probation, he would comply with the terms and conditions,
including participation in a sexual offender program and sex
registration. -

The defendant?s plans for the future include earning a degree in
electrical engineering. He recently met with an Ohio judge and
is in the process of establishing a program for high school and
college students in which he speaks about his experience and-
?speaks out against the college campus drinking culture and the
sexual promiscuity that goes along with that. I want to show
people that one night of drinking can ruin a life. I don?t want
anyone to experience any part of this situation. I Want to be an
example so young people realize how much of an issue this is.?

In the Case of BROCK ALLEN TURNER
Docket 31577162 June 2, 2016

Regarding drug and alcohol use, the defendant admitted drinking
alcohol in college. His first night at Stanford University, the
sophomore swim team had a party for the incoming freshman swim
team. There was alcohol at the party and at every party
thereafter and he drank beer most weekends. The defendant denied
ever using any illicit substances and stated he has not consumed
alcohol since the date of the instant offense.

Since the instant offense, the defendant has suffered from
depression. He is currently in weekly therapy and is prescribed
Lexapro for depression.

The defendant was born and raised in Ohio. In September 2014, he
moved to Stanford University on a partial swimming scholarship.
Following the instant offenses, he withdrew his scholarship and
moved back to his parents' home in Ohio. He is currently working
as a team member for a company that organizes triathlons and
other races. He has an older brother and sister, both of whom
reside nearby. - -

 

INTERESTED PARTIES 

In the course of preparing this report, the undersigned
contacted the assigned Deputy District Attorney, as Court
transcripts were not a part of the information provided to
probation. She stated the defendant was untruthful in his
testimony regarding the victim being unconscious during the
instant offenses. 

The undersigned met with the defendant?s attorney prior to the
presentence interview; he did wish to provide additional

information.

Please see attached numerOus letters of reference..

RESULTS OF ASSESSMENT:

 

Current law requires that the risk assessment score on the
Static?99R be completed by the Probation Department for every
eligible person (Sections and 290.06 of the Penal
Code). The defendant was scored on the Static?99R, an actuarial
measure of risk for sexual offense recidivism, which is
attached. 

In the Case of BROCK ALLEN TURNER
Docket B1577162 June 2, 2016

This instrument has been shown to be a moderate predictor of
sexual re~offense potential. The defendant received a total
score of 3, which places him in the Low?Moderate Risk Category
for being charged or convicted of another sexual offense. His
risk on release from a prison sentence cannot be calculated
until his age on release on parole is known, so the risk score
stated herein is predictive of risk at release on probation,
based on his age at the date of this report. If the defendant
has a prior conviction for a registrable sex offense, his risk
score was calculated based on his age at release on the most
recent registrable sex offense.

Pursuant to Section 1202.8 of the Penal Code, every person who
has been assessed with the State Authorized Risk Assessment Tool
for Sex Offenders (SARATSO) pursuant to Sections 290.04 to
290.06, inclusive, and who has a SARATSO risk level of high
shall_be continuously electronically monitored while on
probation, unless the court determines that such monitoring is
unnecessary for a particular person.

The defendant received a score of 3 on the Static?99R, dated May
9, 2016, which is attached. This score is in the Low-Moderate
range of risk relative to other adult male sex offenders.

I RISK AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT (CAIS)

Assessment provides objective and empirically validated
evaluations of an offender?s risk and needs. Addressing the
offender's risk and needs and matching the offender to the
identified level of services are linked to changing offender
behavior, appropriate use of resources and public protection.

The defendant was assessed for risk and need factors using the
Corrections AsseSSment Intervention System (CATS). CAIS is a
standardized, validated assessment and case management system
developed by the National Council on Crime and Delinquency
(NCCD). The CATS assesses a defendant?s criminogenic needs and
risk to re-offend. Criminogenic needs refer to those dynamic.
risk factors that directly contribute to criminal behavior and
are most prediCtive of recidivism. When these criminogenic risk
factors are addressed or changed they can reduce the likelihood
of recidivism.

In the Case of BROCK ALLEN TURNER
Docket 31577162 - June 2, 2016

The result of the CATS assessment has identified the defendant's
criminogenic needs/risk factors also referred to as Principal
Service Needs. Should the defendant receive probation, it is
imperative that the supervision process begin addressing the
identified needs which include the following:

Strength: Family History

It should be noted that family therapy is often a useful
intervention. Staff should provide considerable support to the
family, who may be under severe stress and confused by the onset
of misconduct, and who may.lack the skills needed to deal with
associated behavior. 

Need: Isolated/Situational/Temporary Circumstances as Highly
Significant -

This is a typical indicator for offenders in this strategy
group. Problems in this area require resolving an
internal problem or learning new coping skills.

Need: Alcohol and/or Drug Abuse as Highly Significant

This may be an issue for offenders and may contribute to
deviation from positive behavior in other areas. The onset of
their addictions may be recent and may be a means for dealing
with a significant mental health issue. Treatment for alcohol
and/or abuse issues should be the focus of the plan prior to
addressing other concerns. Because they cannot legally access
alcohol or substances in the institutional setting, monitor them
for physical problems related to withdrawal and for attempts to
illegally access alcohol or substances. 

JUDICIAL COUNCIL RULES 4.414, 4.421 and 4.423: (Attached)

10

In the Case of BROCK ALLEN TURNER
Docket 31577162 June 2, 2016



 

The 20 year old defendant is appearing before the Court after
having been found guilty by jury of Assault with Intent to
Commit Rape, Sexual Penetration when the Victim was Intoxicated,
and Sexual Penetration where the Victim was Unconscious of the
Nature of the Act. - 

During the instant offense, passersby found the 22 year old
female victim, unconscious and lying near a dumpster on the
Stanford University campus. They reported initially thinking the
defendant and victim were having consensual sexual intercourse,
but then noticed the victim was not moving, so they approached.
When they caught the defendant's attention, he slowly got off of
the victim and backed away. The witnesses chased the defendant
and detained him until police arrival. The defendant admitted
having consensual sexual relations with the victim and believed
she ?seemed to enjoy? it.

The defendant does not have a criminal history.

During the presentence interview, the defendant expressed
sincere remorse and empathy for the victim. He stated, ?Having
imposed suffering on someone else and causing someone else pain-
I mean,'I can barely live with myself. I can't even get out of
bed in the morning. I think about it every second of every day.
Her [the victim] having to go through the justice system because
of my actions justmit's unforgivable."

The victim in this matter will forever be impacted by the
defendant?s conduct. When the undersigned interviewed her, she
provided a clear illustration of the hurt and devastation caused
by the instant offenses and the ordeal of the trial. This I
officer was struck by the victim?s ability to objectively digest
the gravity and ramifications of the defendant?s behavior and
while she was understandably traumatized by the experience, her
focus and concern was treatment, rather than incarceration.

There do not appear to be aggravating circumstances, other than
the victim was particularly vulnerable in that she was heavily
intoxicated; however, the victim being intoxicated and/or
unconscious of the nature of the act is an element of the crime
and therefore cannot be used as an aggravating circumstance. The
sole mitigating circumstance is the defendant?s lack of prior.
convictions.

ll

In the Case of saocK ALLEN TURNER 
Doeket B1577162 - June 2, 2016

In determining an appropriate recommendation, this officer 
considered myriad factors, including the impact of the crime en
the victim and the safety of the community. Other factors
included the defendant?s lack of a criminal history, his
youthful age, and his expressed remorse and empathy toward the
victim. During the presentence interview, the defendant
demonstrated a comprehension that the victim, in her state, was
unable to make an informed decision and in that moment, he had a
moral responsibility to act in her best interest, which he
failed to do. 

.Thus, although the defendant?s eligibility for probation is
limited, this officer believes there are circumstances which
support the granting of probation, the first being the
circumstance giving rise to the probation limitation in this
case appears to be less serious than circumstances typically
present in others involving the same probation limitation, and
the defendant has no recent record of committing similar crimes
or crimes of violence.

This case, when compared to other crimes of similar nature, may
be considered less Serious due to the defendant?s level of
intoxication. Secondly, with respect to his limited culpability,
the defendant is youthful and has no prior convictions.

Furthermore, pursuant to the General Objectives in Sentencing
(Judicial CR 4.410), which include punishing the defendant,
encouraging him to lead a law abiding life, and deterring him
from future criminality, this officer weighed the fact that this
20 year old offender is now a lifetime sex registrant, his 
future prospects will likely be highly impacted as a result of
his convictions, and he surrendered a hard earned swimming
scholarship. Perhaps, just as importantly, but sometimes
overlooked, are the victim?s wishes as to the potential outcome.

Based on the aforementioned information, a moderate county jail
sentence, formal probation, and sexual offender treatment is
respectfully recommended. The defendant informed this officer he
intended on remaining in Ohio and did not plan on returning to
California. In an effort to expedite an interstate compact
transfer request, this officer suggests the defendant be
remanded today.

12

In the Case of BROCK ALLEN TURNER

Docket B1577162

June 2, 2016

RECOMMENDATION:

 

(B1577162)

l.

ImpositiOn of sentence be suspended. Formal Probation be
granted for three years.

The defendant is ordered to go to the Probation Department
within two (2) business days of release and thereafter as
directed by the Probation Department. If during your term
of probation you are deported, you must notify the
Probation Department of your deportation within 5 days.
While out of the country you must notify the Probation
Department by whatever means of communication are available
to you of your location or residence. If you return.to the
United States, you must report your re?entry to this
country to the Probation Department Within 5 days of your
return, and report in person to the Probation Department as
directed.

The defendant is ordered to report to the Department of
Revenue within.30 days for the completion of a payment plan
for fines and fees. -

A County Jail sentence be imposed. The defendant be granted
credits.

Restitution as determined by the Court.

Pursuant to Section of the Penal Code, as a
condition of release from Formal Probation, the defendant
shall enter, participate in and complete an approved sex
offender management program, following the standards
developed pursuant to Section 9003 of the Penal Code, for a

.period of not less than one year, up to the entire term of

probation, as determined by the certified sex offender
management professional in consultation with the Probation
Officer and as approved by the Court.

The defendant shall waive any privilege against self?
incrimination and participate in polygraph examinations,
which shall be part of the sex offender management program,
pursuant to Section of the Penal Code.

13

In the Case of BROCK ALLEN TURNER

Docket B1577162

10.

ll.

12.

13.

14.

15.

17.

18.

June 2, 2016

The defendant shall waive any 
privilege to enable communication between the sex offender
management professional and the Probation Officer, pursuant
to Section and Section 290.09 of the Penal
Code. I -

The defendant shall pay all certified sex offender
management program participation fees as determined by the
Court, pursuant to Section 1203.067Cc) of the Penal Code.

The defendant shall submit to chemical tests as directed by
the Probation Officer.

The defendant shall not knowingly possess or knowingly
consume alcohol or go to places where he/she knows alcohol
is the primary item-of sale.

The defendant shall submit his/her person, place of
residence, vehicle and any property under his/her control
to search at any time without a warrant by any Peace
Officer.

'The defendant shall seek and maintain gainful employment

and/or_maintain academic and/or vocational training as
directed by the Probation Officer.

The defendant shall not own, knowingly possess, or have
within his/her custody or control any firearm-or ammunition
for the rest of his/her life pursuant to Section 29800 and
Section 30305 of the Penal Code.

A Restitution Fine of between $300 and $10,000 and a 10%
Administrative Fee be imposed pursuant to Section 1202.4 of
the Penal Code.

An additional Probation Revocation Restitution Fine equal
to that imposed under Penal Code Section 1202.4 be imposed
and suspended pursuant to Section 1202.44 of the Penal
Code.

The defendant be ordered to register pursuant to Section
290 of the Penal Code and to comply with Section 290.85 of
the Penal Code.

A fine of $300.00 plus penalty assessment be imposed
pursuant to Section 290.3 of the Penal Code.

14

In the Case of BROCK ALLEN TURNER

Docket B1577162

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

June 2, 2016

The defendant shall submit to a blood test for evidence of
antibodies to the probable causative agent of acquired
immune deficiency (AIDS), pursuant to Section
1202.1 of the Penal Code.

The defendant be ordered to supply buccal swab samples,
prints, blood specimens, and/or other biological samples
pursuant to Section 296 of the Penal Code.

In addition to the above orders of probation, the Court
hereby orders the following fees, which are not conditions
of probation, however, are separately due to the Department
of Revenue during the period of probation. The failure to
pay such fees will result in civil collection and potential
loss of the California Driver?s License. -

A Court Security Fee of $120.00 be imposed pursuant to
Section 1465.8 of the Penal Code.

A Criminal Conviction Assessment of $90.00 be_imposed
pursuant to Section 70373 of the Government Code.

A $129.75 Criminal Justice Administration fee to the City
Of Stanford be imposed pursuant to Government Code 29550,
29550.1 and 29550.2.

A Presentence Investigation Fee not to exceed $450.00 be
imposed pursuant-to Section 1203.1b of the Penal Code.

A Probation Supervision Fee not to exceed $110.00 per month
be imposed pursuant to Section 1203.1b of the Penal Code.

15

In the Case of BROCK ALLEN TURNER

Docket B1577162

June 2, 2016

(51576943)

1. Probation be denied.

2. The defendant is ordered to report to the Department of
Revenue within 30 days for the completion of a payment plan
for fines and fees.

3. A County Jail sentence be imposed. The defendant be granted
credits.

4. A Restitution Fine of between $150 and $1,000 and a 10%
Administrative Fee be imposed pursuant to Section 1202.e of
the Penal Code.

5. A Court Seourity Fee of $40.00 be imposed pursuant to-
Section 1465.8 of the Penal Code.

(continued)

16

In Lhe Case of EROCK ALLEN TURNER
Docket E1577162 June 2, 2016

 

6. A Criminal Convic~icn Assessment Fee of $30.00 be imposed
pursuant to section 70373 of the Government Code.

NOTE: Attorney fees if appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

Laura Garnette
Chief Probation Officer

Mon 3 ssettre

Dei ti Proba ion officer

ML/ml
Attachments

Renewed by:

gea 
Suierv ni Probation Office:

The above report has been read and consider by the Court.

  
  
  

AARON PERS
Judge of uperior Court
Santa Clara County, California

15