DRAFT 6/8/Texas Department of Transportation ?u 9 0 3 VIASTER ASSESSMENT PROCESS DALLAS CITY CENTER MASTER ASSESSMENT PROCESS THE CHALLENGE: MOUNTING CONGESTION AND FUNDING CONSTRAINTS As major metro areas in Texas continue rapid population growth, the state’s urban highway system becomes more and more congested. Addressing that congestion effectively will require a comprehensive and transparent approach to confront a variety of factors including both statewide and local connectivity. Twenty-first century planning, design, reconstruction and long-term maintenance of Texas urban highway corridors will depend upon collaboration and partnerships reaching beyond the independent capacity of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). According to the North Central Texas Council of Governments’ (NCTCOG) 2040 Mobility Plan, the region “is expected to experience a 48 percent increase in population and 46 percent increase in employment. The transportation system is central to this growth because it allows for the efficient movement of people and goods. Without adequate transportation funding to ensure a high level of mobility, the region will face challenges in sustaining economic growth.” Voters emphasized the importance of highway funding with the passage of Proposition 7 in 2015, which raises money for infrastructure projects by dedicating a portion of sales tax revenue and diverting a percentage of the motor vehicle sales tax. This measure is expected to bring in approximately $3 billion a year for transportation in addition to the approved Proposition 1 which passed in 2014. The money generated by both Proposition 7 and Proposition 1, however, may not be enough, as available funding is expected to only keep congestion at current levels. Other sources of funding are necessary to address critical highvolume freeway choke points that provide congestion relief crucial to municipal and regional businesses and the overall Texas economy. As recognized by NCTCOG’s plan, the newly passed propositions are insufficient sources of money to address the growing regional problem even when combined with federal dollars. Creating sustainable partnerships will require significant local financial participation in addition to active collaboration. It is through these partnerships and collaboration that tremendous opportunities are realized. Why Dallas? Governor Greg Abbott recently initiated the Texas Clear Lanes program lead by the Texas Transportation Commission to identify and address the state’s most congested chokepoints and to work with planners and engineers to get new roads planned, designed and built helping spur economic development and jobs creation. Located at the crossroads of several major highway chokepoints, Downtown Dallas has six freeways that fall into the top 25 of the 100 most congested roadways in Texas greatly impacting the North Texas freeway system and the local and state economies. In fact, NCTCOG urges that the system’s performance will decline even if their 2040 Mobility Plan recommendations are implemented; however, “if no improvements are made, by 2040, the average trip would take 98 percent longer to complete in congested conditions than in uncongested conditions.” In addition to capacity and operational improvements, these highways are aging and portions need to be replaced to address maintenance and safety issues. Regardless of how critical it is to accomplish these improvements, it is not a simple fix within the context of a major urban city and innovative solutions must be found to realize Governor Abbott’s vision for Texas. To respond to the need for innovation, Dallas CityMAP was created. DALLAS CITYMAP BRIEFING DOCUMENT DRAFT 6/8/16 2 DALLAS CITY CENTER MASTER ASSESSMENT PROCESS THE SOLUTION Termed the Dallas City Center Master Assessment Process (CityMAP), CityMAP provides the opportunity for public input to communicate the development of options for informed collective decision-making for the major highways leading into the core of downtown Dallas. Seizing this opportunity, TxDOT initiated an effort focused on Dallas’ urban core to help untangle some of North Texas’ most congested and aging freeway infrastructure while addressing what stakeholders value most. The CityMAP initiative is an assessment of the challenges, opportunities and redesign options for the aging interstate corridors and adjacent neighborhoods in and around downtown Dallas. TxDOT initiated the process in early 2015 to understand how congestion relief and city design can be considered comprehensively by engaging with community stakeholders, the City of Dallas and Dallas County. Providing an early advanced planning framing of the issues through a comprehensive look at the corridors—both inside and outside the right-of-way lines—CityMAP lays the groundwork for multi-partner decision-making on project prioritization, funding and construction. Framing options through a comprehensive process will minimize public and local partner resistance, avoid costly planning and design delays, and allow TxDOT to test options early for community acceptance, operational performance, funding feasibility and partnership potential. OPTIMIZING SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CityMAP recognizes that the highway corridors at the core of Dallas are part of a system impacting the region and beyond. In fact, as indicated earlier, four of the corridors (I-30, I-35E, I-345, and I-45) assessed as part of CityMAP fall into the top 25 of the most congested roadways in Texas. If this congestion is not met with integrated solutions reflecting statewide, regional and local shared goals that seek a balance for mobility, livability and economic development, it will be stymied by a degrading quality of life as frustrations increase for the commuting public and adjacent neighborhoods. Looking both inside and outside the right-of-way, CityMAP presents concepts, diverse ideas, possibilities for roadway design, and adjacent neighborhood and community development impacting the future of the Dallas core. In addition to linking the various corridor scenarios into systemwide combinations to test traffic impacts, CityMAP uses stakeholder-informed factors to evaluate each scenario for improved mobility, livability, and economic vitality. Based on stakeholder input, CityMAP includes the following scenarios: I-30 Canyon compressed footprint; taking a portion of the I-30 East Corridor below grade; relocating I-30; improving connections for I-35E Lowest Stemmons and The Southern Gateway; and modifying, removing or lowering I-345/I-45. At-a-Glance sheets have been prepared to provide a snapshot of each scenario as part of this briefing. OBSERVED TRAVEL PATTERNS The Dallas CityMAP Team performed a survey of trips on the freeways in the vicinity of the Central Business District (CBD) to determine how motorists use the “spoke” system of corridors navigating to and through the “hub” of downtown Dallas. The survey determined that the radial spokes serve two important functions. A primary function for all routes is to serve the downtown area. However, an additional function is to distribute trips to each of the remaining routes. In most cases each approach route links a percentage of its trips approaching the CBD to two or three of the spoke routes departing the CBD. DALLAS CITYMAP BRIEFING DOCUMENT DRAFT 6/8/16 3 DALLAS CITY CENTER MASTER ASSESSMENT PROCESS For each of the origins, downtown receives the highest or next highest percentage of origin trips. This indicates downtown Dallas as the destination. In each case, the direct through route, either north/south or east/west, also receives high trip share. This demonstrates the importance of each route to downtown and the CBD; and, the important role each of the corridors immediately adjacent to the CBD has to the Dallas freeway network. Based on this information, it is clear that the Downtown Freeway System links the various parts of the city and the region to each other. Observation stations were located close to the center of Dallas. Because of this, it can be assumed that through-downtown trips may be to other destinations in the city such as jobs along the I-35E/Stemmons Corridor or US 75/North Central Expressway, or some of them may be longer trips that leave Dallas. In order to study this from a regional/sub-regional perspective, the team also performed surveys to determine the percentage of trips that begin and end outside of the Dallas loop as defined by I-20, I-635, and Loop 12. While these through trips exist, they are small in comparison to the number of trips which originate outside the loop and leave the freeway inside the loop. Only a small percentage of the trips on the radial routes are completely through in the sense that they have both an origin and a destination outside of this freeway loop. Dallas’ hub and spoke freeway system serves a multitude of travel patterns. The most prevalent remains direct access to the CBD and greater Downtown from the City, suburban neighbors, and the region. SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS The decision-making process for these transformative scenarios presented in CityMAP require parallel considerations of city infrastructure, private development, and funding outside of TxDOT. The results of CityMAP provide the opportunity to relate the scenarios with other considerations in order to guide partnerships for project prioritization, funding and implementation. A synopsis of discoveries by scenario is presented in the following information graphic, also a part of this briefing. HOW TO USE CITYMAP CityMAP explored the “art of the possible” and stakeholder input guided scenario development. What emerged was the convergence of mobility/congestion relief, livability/quality of life and economic development. In this context, the CityMAP scenarios are supported by geometric implications, traffic analysis, economic analysis, urban design options and other factors. Those factors provide a comprehensive platform for decision-making. CONSIDERATIONS CityMAP provides a tremendous amount of information and analysis for each of the corridors. A critical first step in establishing a logical sequence of understanding the opportunities – for the respective corridors and their impact on the overall system – has already been made with the decision to construct the I-30/I-35E Horseshoe Project which is currently underway. The graphics on page 6 show each corridor’s relationship to one another. This is important because each corridor cannot be viewed in isolation; they are all interconnected. DALLAS CITYMAP BRIEFING DOCUMENT DRAFT 6/8/16 4 DALLAS CITY CENTER MASTER ASSESSMENT PROCESS The scenarios for I-35E Lowest Stemmons and I-35E The Southern Gateway are logical extensions of the “Horseshoe” Project. CityMAP also provides several design scenarios for I-345/I-45 and I-30. Each scenario invariably impacts the others. Various combinations of scenarios add to the importance of using the CityMAP document for informed decision-making. A logical first step in the decision-making process could be considering the viability of the I-30 Relocate scenario, which is arguably the most transformative and complex idea. The decision to relocate I-30 should be determined early in order to inform the I-30 Canyon and East Corridor projects. In addition, the I-30 Relocate scenario decision should be closely coordinated with other planned projects such as the Trinity Parkway and S.M. Wright/175. This coordination should also consider the I-30 Relocate alignment’s potential impacts on the new Riverfront Boulevard, DART D2, possible high-speed rail station, and several other major area investments. Scenarios representative of stakeholder input for the I-345/I-45 corridor are also assessed in the CityMAP document. Determining which of the I-345/I-45 scenarios is preferred will add clarity to the ongoing I-30 Canyon and East Corridor project development process. NEXT STEPS The CityMAP scenarios and the factor analysis are not the final outcome. Rather, the scenarios provide a substantial starting point based on listening to stakeholders, conducting research and analysis, and developing conceptual designs. The next step will be to begin project priority discussions with local partner agencies from their review of CityMAP and continue the dialogue of integrated problem-solving. Based on the findings of the CityMAP study, it is recommended that agencies including the City of Dallas, Dallas County, DART, NCTCOG and TxDOT work together to develop project prioritization, sequencing (see table below), and funding packages that are supportive of stakeholder needs and desires. CityMAP Scenario Timeline 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 TOTAL I-35E SOUTHERN GATEWAY 2 I-35E LOWEST STEMMONS I-30 THE CANYON 2 4 6 Yrs. 3 5 Yrs. 2 I-30 EAST CORRIDOR 4 6 I-30 RELOCATE 2 I-345/I-45 MODIFY 2 4 10 Yrs. 4 10 Yrs. 15 3 7 1 24 Yrs. 6 Yrs. I-345/I-45 REMOVE 6 14 4 24 Yrs. I-345/I-45 BELOW GRADE 6 14 4 24 Yrs. ADD TO MTP & SECURE FUNDING PLANNING, DESIGN, ROW ACQUISITION, UTILITY RELOCATION, PROCUREMENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION DALLAS CITYMAP BRIEFING DOCUMENT DRAFT 6/8/16 5 DALLAS CITY CENTER MASTER ASSESSMENT PROCESS System Based On I-30 Relocation Scenario J I-30 Relocate Scenario I-345/I-45 Decision Point: - Modify Scenario - Remove Scenario - Below-Grade Scenario I-35E Lowest Stemmons Scenario I-35E Southern Gateway Scenario TxDOT Horseshoe Project Under Construction NTTA Trinity Parkway Project First-Order Decision: Is the I-30 Relocate Scenario Advanced? • Impacts I-30 Canyon and I-30 East Corridor Scenarios • Coordinate with S.M. Wright/US 175 Project Second-Order Decision: How is I-345/I-45 Advanced? • Modify Scenario, Remove Scenario, or Below-Grade Scenario System Based On I-30 Canyon And East Corridor Scenarios J I-30 Canyon and East Corridor Scenarios I-345/I-45 Decision Point: - Modify Scenario - Remove Scenario - Below-Grade Scenario I-35E Lowest Stemmons Scenario I-35E Southern Gateway Scenario TxDOT Horseshoe Project Under Construction NTTA Trinity Parkway Project First-Order Decision: Advance the I-30 Canyon and I-30 East Corridor Scenarios? Second-Order Decision: How is I-345/I-45 Advanced? • Modify Scenario, Remove Scenario, or Below-Grade Scenario DALLAS CITYMAP BRIEFING DOCUMENT DRAFT 6/8/16 6 DALLAS CITYMAP I-30 CANYON COMPRESSED SCENARIO AT-A-GLANCE HI HI CK CK OR OR YS YS TR TR EE EE T T T LIVABILITY/QUALITY OF LIFE OA K LA N E SA SA NT NT AF A E A FE A VE V NU ENU E E HI HI CK CK OR OR YS YS TR TR EE EE T DA DA W W SO SO N N ST ST RE RE ET ET Below-grade alignment would preclude future main-lane widening. M NE EY NE OA K LA ER LA EY ER H NE AS S M LA JE S H AS RI JE EE T ST R EE FF ES FF M ST R T ST R EE RI T ER ES LI ST N AL RE ST CO M ET RE LM ER E T M X LIN M AL BO S YR CO UL TR TL LM EV EE E ST AR T X M B R D YR OU EE TL T LE E VA ST RD RE ET S M SA EE T S EE T AN ST R EE ST R EE W AY T CE B M CO M AL B LI PS W AY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/GROWTH PS EE CO EN T ST R AR EE CE ST R EN CL RE ST ST R LI T AL BS TA CL M O CO TA AN ET AR LO G BS M Builds on current development momentum at the Farmers Assumes surplus right-of-way at reconfigured Cesar Chavez Boulevard would be sold at market value in public process to Market and Southside at Lamar neighborhoods. provide development opportunities. Offers the potential to stimulate significant redevelopment in Leverages transformative opportunities around the HSR the southern sector. station. AT L AN TA AT L AN E T D EV AR UL KI NG JR BL BL VD VD R NG HE JR UL EV AR BO UT SO ST BO ST SO M B D W AY CO W OO T H D SCENARIO DETAILS175 H K W OO GE UT ED NC RE A CL EE ST R EE RO W GE E TR ES PA R ED ET PA R A CL R ST K E CE N RE ST R NU ET AV E RO W AV E NU TA D O CO E EE M R ST AR TIN M KI LU T AR TIN B M CO LI T EE PS AL LI PS SCENARIO LIMITS: I-30 from 175 Hotel Street to east of I-45 R E ST AN ST HE AV E K T E RE AT L ET AT L RE LU T E K T AN ST R NU T EE R ST W AY HI T AL ON DA DA W W SO SO N N ST ST RE RE ET ET LL HA AU MO T S NT S TR TR EE EE T T BE CK CK OR O Y S RY S TR TR EE EE T T LE LE AR AR S S CO CO TR TR RI RI E E ET ET NT NT H H ST ST RE RE ET ET RI RI CH CH AR AR DS DS ON ON AV AV E E KE KE LL LL YA YA VE VE NU NU E E EE ST R EE AU M BE EE CK CK M T ST R EE ST R T NO EE ST R NO GA M E IV GA HI T EE ST R T NO EE GA ST R NO GA T EE T E IV DR DR IV AN IV AN LL T I-30 reconstruction in the Canyon will necessitate coordination with Union Pacific Railroad at existing bridges and Texas Central Railway (TCR) regarding potential High Speed Rail (HSR) crossing of I-30. EE LO G T EE LL SU SU MC KE ES ES TR TR EE EE T T KE MC AV E NU 175 EE ST R SA NT NT AF A E A FE A VE V NU ENU E E RS IC AN A CO ST R IC AN A ST R EE T ST ST LO LO UI UI S S ST ST RE RE ET ET CA NT NT ON ON ST ST RE RE ET ET DI DI Z Z ST ST RE RE ET ET CA CA CA EV IEW ST ST RE RE ET ET EV IEW LL BE LL BE ET LI VE OA K ST ST RE RE ET ET LI VE OA K BR BR YA YA N N ST ST RE RE ET ET CA DI ZS ZS TR TR EE EE T T DI K ST R PY PY EX EX ER ER TIM ATIM LA L OD GO S K PA R UT T T EE TR YS OR T K E C E HI TR ET YS RE OR K ST C IS HI RR ET E FE R ST IS RR FE EE OD PA R ES TN R ST GO CA ST N S ER VA YS TR S EE ER T VA YS TR EE T Y VA ER T JEF FE RS R ON SON BO BO UL UL EV EV AR A D V RD V IAD IA UC DUC T T E S FE E NU R ST JEF NU AV E Y VA ER H US OUS TO T N S ON S TR TR EE E T V ET V IAD IA UC DUC T T AV E S HO T E RE O WS DA UT CH UE UE EN EN AV AV N N ISO RISO R HA K T RR S T T T HA EE PA R UE UE EN EN AV AV T 1S E NU VE EA D D AR AR EV EV UL UL BO BO ET ET EZ EZ RE RE AV AV ST ST CH R CH OD OD A WO RWO ES AR A SH SH ST R SC T EE ST R The scenario identifies three deck park opportunities connecting downtown to South Dallas. If local partners support and fund deck parks, significant redevelopment opportunities could be realized. AR K EE T EE ST R Increased connectivity enhances access to existing DART light rail stations at convention center and Cedars offering regional mobility options in addition to a future DART D2 light rail planned station. Creates complete street bridges that offer pedestrian and The proposed deck park linking the convention center and cycling linkages across I-30, improving neighborhood character possible HSR station provides an opportunity for a front door into and connections to the Farmers Market, Heritage Village, the convention center from the south. convention center and the Cedars neighborhood. ES PA R ST R T 1S E VE EA N SC PA UL UE UE EN EN AV AV D 2N N ES TN PY PY EX EX ER ER TIM ATIM LA L OD GO S PA UL D CH O WS DA OD GO ST EE ST R ES TN R ST D ST COM CH EV AR S 2N UT NU S N ES TN UT IS T BA YL OR CH ST R EE U LO EE T MER CE S SITIO TREE N AV T ENU E EXPO SITIO N AV ENU E MOBILITY/CONGESTION RELIEF EXPO Implements features of Project Pegasus, including reconfiguring the Cesar Chavez interchange to a simple diamond interchange with connections to the I-30 express lanes and removing the collector-distributor system, adding continous frontage roads and other changes that simplify ramps and access to downtown. S T UE UE EN EN AV AV K K UN UN TR TR S BA YL OR IS BO MER CE S TREE S T CAN U LO X EET EET AY STR AY STR MURR MURR EET EET US STR US STR OWD OWD N CR N CR EET COM SCENARIO LENGTH: 1.6 mile +/- SR IVE RF SR RO N IVE D COM REE TON ST T T EE DY ) RS TU VA R EET E STR MERC N STR EE R STR TAYLO PY PY EX EX ER ER TIM ATIM LA L OD GO S LE COM CANTO EREET T R ST RS TU DE DY ) OU T ENU EET E STR MERC Provides congestion relief (lane capacity increase) and safety improvements, as well as improved local network connectivity. R ST TAYLO OD GO T T T EE EE EE ST R R ST T D EE ST R T ST R AR AU ST IN T EE AU ST IN AR EE AK M S LA ST R N AV S AR SITIO UL EE ST R T STREE EE OR YL TA OR YL TA T R ST TB ST R ST DE UN RO N R ST D UN KW AY ( RF N I FF AR KW AY ( PA R D AK TY S M EE PA R RW OO HA D S INI T S LA MAIN REET T EE TR YS OR ET CK E I H TR YS OR CK HI T T EE EE TR TR LS LS AL W IVE TR ST R EE HA LM RW OO AL W S T SR TY ST R T D D AR AR EV EV UL UL BO Z BO EZ E AV AV T EE INI AU ST IN EE CH R ST TR BLVD AR ST R R D ERFR ONT M S E R ST ON NT CH EE AR S RIV S R ST R S BLVD A ES AK T A ES S T R SC T EE R ST EE EE T E STRE ET EE TW EE R ST ET DE SC D LS TR T T EE EE TR TR L S RL S A PE N Y T AR T S E S ER VAY STR EET E S ER T VAY IN W I EEBRO STR T R FF R I G T EET W EE S GR R D N ER ST FI BR IN IF ST IFF OW RE GR GR ET DE R ST ET RE RE ET ST N A TT ET A E H TR W S O P AN TT HA W PO ET STR E BR OW EE HO TE LA DE R BR ST OW DE R ST EE AK LS TR AR P EX S R ST HO TE PE ER RD ET S BR OW STR E CA AL CO T REE LA ST IL MAR ILLA A AK STR E T MAR S FIN AN M REE G ST N YOU RD VA T T REE ELM ST BA ET E RY ST LO N R TO C N TIM LA YOU LE EET EET N STR N STR USTOHOUSTO S FIN GRIF ERFR ONT T T TREE NG S T U BO ET ET STRE STRE MAR LAMAR N EE REET ELM ST PY EXPO T STREE MAIN E STREET MERC COM EET E STR MERC COM ET E STRE STRE PAULST PAUL N T TREE T ON SSTREE KS JACW OOD EZ AV ST R PY EX MAIN OD GO S JACK CH D N LA REET GRIF S RIV S AR T TREE ON S HA RW OO HO TE LS TR ES S T ET ET STRE STRE RKET RKET S MA S MA S HO L DR L DR OTE OTE CY H CY H GEN GEN T REYATT RE H RD VARD EVA E OUL OUL NT B NT B FRO FRO IVER RIVER N FFIN EET E STRE G ST HYAT NR GRI SC T D WOO YOUN LVD MAIN WO Potential Parks andParks Open Spaces ION B REUN T EE E STR MERC COM T STREE TREE OD S EET D STR WOO STREET G YOUN LVD E COM DART Station Streetcar Parks Station and Open Spaces DART ION B T TREE LM S T STREE MAIN E STR MERC Railway Trinity Railway Express Streetcar Railway REUN T T TREE TREE LD S LD S S FIE S FIE ET E STRE STRE IFFIN IFFIN N GR N GR ENUE IC AV EET PACIF STR ELM Future Future Dallas-Houston DART LRT (D2) High-Speed Rail (HSR) Future Dallas-Houston High-Speed Rail (HSR) Future Dallas-Fort Worth Core Express Service HSR (DFWCES) Future Dallas-Fort Worth Core Trinity Railway Express ServiceExpress HSR (DFWCES) Potential Parks UE T T TREE TREE VAY S VAY S N ER N ER Planned PotentialDevelopment Development DART Light Rail Transit (LRT) Planned Development FutureLight DARTRail LRTTransit (D2) (LRT) DART EX REET ELM ST REET ST MAIN AVEN IC PACIF E U AVEN ER E ENU IC AV PACIF M STREET EL N ST Direct Connector On/Off Ramps Ramps Potential Development Direct Connector Ramps IC PACIF ER LA TIM EET EET Y STR Y STR HENR HENR 345 345 LA TIM ET ET STRE STRE LTON LTON S WA S WA TEXAS ET ET RE RE ST ST E IV OL Improved Streets, Frontage I-30 Roads, and Cross Streets Improved Streets, Frontage Express Lanes Roads, and Cross Streets On/Off ExpressRamps Lanes OD UE VEN NA STO GA UE N VE NA STO GA SW 345 E IV OL T OD GO AV RD RD LEVA LEVA X BOU X BOU LCOLM LCOLM N MA N MA EE I-30 MAP LEGEND 366 S IS GO E U EN ST RE T E AV LL SW EE ST R S IS ET D E NU ST R HA D ST RE RW OO HA RW OO TEXAS MAP LEGEND HA RS N CO N 366 TEXAS 366 TB RF OU RO N LE TB SCENARIO FACILITY CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE VA R OU D LE VA R D Under $100M $100M - 499M $500M - 999M $1B - 2B Over $2B EXISTING CROSS-SECTION M = Million B = Billion MOST CONGESTED ROADWAYS IN TEXAS RANK: 16 ANNUAL HOURS OF DELAY PER MILE: 441,769 ANNUAL COST OF DELAY: $90.65 Million POTENTIAL DECK PARK AT HARWOOD STREET SCENARIO CROSS-SECTION FACILITY DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION DURATION Identify Need Needs Assessment Advanced Planning Environmental & Design Studies Detail Design ROW, Utilities Scenario Timeline Estimate - 2017 thru 2026 Construction 10 Years* *Includes two-year period to add to Metropolitan Transportation Plan DRAFT 6/8/16 MASTER ASSESSMENT PROCESS 7 1│INTRODUCTION DRAFT MAY 2016 6 DALLAS CITYMAP I-30 EAST CORRIDOR BELOW GRADE SCENARIO AT-A-GLANCE N H CK ICK O OR Y S RY S T TR E E RE E T T D DA W AWS SO ON N S ST RE TRE ET ET HI H CK ICK O OR Y S RY S TR TR EE EE T T SA SA N NT A F TA F EA EA V VE NU ENU E E DA DA W W SO SO N N S ST RE TRE ET ET LA NE HI OA K NE LA NE LA AS NE LA H AS T T EE ST R E NU E IVE T EE R ST T E RE Facility Capital Cost (TxDOT) $735 Million A CL CE EN R LA ST W AY C ED GE ED W OO D W ST OO D ST GE ST R TB OU LE RO VA NT RD BO UL EV AR D ANNUAL COST OF DELAY: FACILITY DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION DURATION Needs Assessment Advanced Planning Environmental & Design Studies Detail Design ROW, Utilities Scenario Timeline Estimate - 2016 thru 2025 DRAFT 6/8/16 7 1│INTRODUCTION DRAFT MAY 2016 8 MASTER ASSESSMENT PROCESS W AY W AY B CO M LI PS LI M RO N RF Identify Need B M CO PS EN AR AL AL UT SO M CO PS B LI M AL LI PS 175 AL $50 Million -$150 Million W AY M B 175 ADDITIONAL FACILITY CAPITAL COSTS BY OTHERS: $90.65 Million CityMAP Scenario TA TA ST R EE T ST RE ET AR AR TIN TIN LU LU TH TH ER ER K KI NG ING JR JR B BL VD LVD CE EE T ST RE ET AN AT L 2.6 miles N RE ST R T CE EE EN ST R CE AR CL AT L AN SCENARIO COST ESTIMATE: ES EE T ST RE ET EE LO G CL NU AV E SCENARIO LENGTH: RI ST R T AN LO G AN ST R AV E ES FF SO UT H BO BO U UL EV LEV AR AR D D K AT LA NT A S T ATL AN TRE ET TA ST ST T BS E RE M E O R T ET S CO S B OM CO E RE H K PA R S RI JE LI M RF 441,769 FF ER ANNUAL HOURS OF DELAY PER MILE: IVE JE N AL ST CO ME S RL RE M LM E AL X IN S T M BO CO T YR UL REE LM TL EV T X M E ST A B R YR OU RE D TL LE ET E VA ST RD RE ET EE PA R T EE R ST I-30 from east of I-45 to Dolphin Street 16 SR ER H S NT ANTA AF E A FE A V VE NU ENU E E K ET EET R RE ST Y ST Y VA VA ER S ER MOST CONGESTED ROADWAYS IN TEXAS RANK: SR K SCENARIO LIMITS: ER VA YS TR ER EE VA T YS TR EE T T EE R ST S EY M P PA RK ARK RO RO W W A AV EN VEN UE UE B AU EAU MO MO NT NT S ST RE TRE C CK ET ET OR KOR YS YS TR TR EE EE T T L LE AR EAR S ST C CO RE TRE RI ORIN ET ET NT T H H S ST RE TRE ET ET RI RI C CH AR HAR D DS ON SON AV AV E E K KE LL ELLY YA VE AVE NU NU E E EE ST R EE T ST R EE EE CK EE CK M GA M T ST R ST R NO LL KE MC BE T EE T E IV DR NO IV E IV AN DR IV AN GA LL SU BE SU MC K E S EE S T TR EE REE T T CA DI ADDITIONAL FACILITY CAPITAL COSTS BY OTHERS: K AV EN PA UE RK AV EN UE ER M SCENARIO DETAILS (INCLUDED IN OVERALL TXDOT PROJECT) S HO HO U US TO STON NS TR STRE EE T V ET V JEF JEF IAD IAD F FE UC UC RS ERSO T T ON NB BO UL OULE EV AR VARD DV IAD VIAD UC UCT T L LL EV LEV IEW IEW S ST RE TRE ET ET S BE CA D Z S IZ S T TR EE REE T T S ET EET R RE ST D ST AR AK EE AU T ST IN ST AU R EE ST T IN ST RE ET Facilty Capital Cost (TxDOT) $2 Billion S KW INI AY TY (UN PA RK DE WA RS Y( TU UN DY DE ) RS TU DY ) ST R T D PA R EE AR Overall East Corridor Project TY AR AK BLVD M S BLVD TBD INI ST R T T EE EE TR STR L S LL A W ERFR ONT TR LA AR PROJECT COST ESTIMATE: ERFR ONT TR M AL W S LA S PA R HI RS CO IC AN A DI AV EN UE GR AN D E 17 miles along I-30 and 11 miles along US 80 S EY PY XPY E EX ER MER TIM LATI LA OD OOD GO S G PROJECT LENGTH: S S PA TRE ET UL ST RE ET S I-30 from I-45 to Bass Pro Drive and US 80 from I-30 to FM 460 PA UL HI T EE ST R T NO EE GA GA NO ST R ST UE UE EN AVEN AV N ON ISO RIS R HA ST RR PROJECT LIMITS: S D RD A AR V E EV UL UL BO BO ET ET EZ EZ RE TRE AV HAV S ST C CH OD OOD AR SAR E WO W AR HAR SC SH S OVERALL TXDOT PROJECT DETAILS LS TR HO EE TE T LS TR EE T S HA T ES R ST SC N FI S SA T EE TR YS ET OR E K C TR HI YS OR CK HI EE TW EE R ST ET M Expands redevelopment character, including broader housing choices, as well as a meaningful context for the redevelopment of the former Ford plant and reinforcement of the Jubilee Neighborhood. CO ET EET RE TR S ST D AR AK E S ER VAY STR EET E S ER T VAY EEB IN F STR TW I R F R E EET E IF OW ST GR R R T G N S D FI BR ER IN IF IFF OW ST GR GR DE REE R T ST RE ET ET RE ST N T A E TT RE HA ST W AN PO TT HA W PO ET STR E Savings, Value = $20.1B OA K ST ST LO LO UI UI S S S ST RE TRE ET ET S D RS AR AK HO TE STR E ET RE ST ON ET WS RE T ET DA S RE N ST SO W RY T DA EE KO R C T HI YS ET OR K RE C ST HI IS ET RR RE FE T S IS RR FE IS D ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/GROWTH BR OW D BR ER OW ST DE R ST UE N VE EA U LO RW OO Retain and grow Baylor-affiliated research facilities as a result of better connectivity. GRIF E AV UT ST ES RE TN ET UT ST RE ET CH Includes careful and complementary development that improves livability along Samuell Grand Park.Benefits, HA HA E NU ISE U LO RW ST OO RE ET D ST RE ET IC AN A S ST RE TRE ET ET N NT ON TON S ST RE TRE ET ET Z Z S ST RE TRE ET ET S ES TN PY XPY E EX ER MER TIM LATI LA OD OOD GO S G CA S T E STRE CH ET RE ST R LO ET Y E R TA ST OR YL TA Creates job opportunities through the transformation of underutilized public and private properties. FIN S RIV H HA LL ALL S ST RE TRE ET ET R ST S CA T EE CK OR YS TR HI ON NT EET R STR TAYLO CO IL MAR ILLA EET D STR WOO EET G STR YOUN EET TR S G YOUN CA T EE T REE LA ST MAR FIN S RIV REET R ST TAYLO SITIO Scale I-30 down to a boulevard BA YL OR ST BA RE YL ET OR CH ES ST TN RE U ET CH TS ES TR TN EE UT T ST RE ET CAN MER CE S TREE T MER CE S TREE T N AV ENU E EXPO SITIO N AV ENU E COM EXPO E UE NU E EN AV T AV 1S T TREE NG S T GRIF SCENARIO CROSS-SECTION 5-2R-5 T REE TON ST COM T 1S T REE G ST N YOU S SCENARIO CROSS-SECTION 4-2R-4 RD RD EVA LEVA OUL BOU NT B NT FRO RFRO IVENR RIVE NR ION REUN BLVD EET N STR CANTO UE UE EN VEN A AV D 2N N ET STRE T E SON JACK OD STRE WO EET D STR WOO T LVD ION B REUN E STR MERC COM D JAC ET EE STRE STR MAR MAR N LA N LA Potential Parks EET 2N STR KSON E STRE ET EET STRET STR RKETARKE S MA S M EET EET N STR N STR USTO USTO S HO S HO R L DR L D OTE HOTE CY H CY GEN EGEN T RE TT R HYAT HYA Parks andParks Open Spaces Potential CO T E STRE N EET E STR MERC COM EET E STR C R E M COM T EE R ST ON NT CA YOU D WOO DART Station Parks and Open Spaces LIVABILITY/QUALITY OF LIFE T STREE MAIN EET E STR MERC COM ET STRE E C R ME COM T T EE EE TR STR L S RL A AR PE N PE EET Trinity Railway Express Railway Streetcar DART Station T STREE RCE MME PY XPY E EX ER MER TIM LATI LA OD OOD GO S G T STREE MAIN Express Service HSR (DFWCES) Trinity Railway Express Railway Streetcar E ENU IC AV PACIF REET ELM ST N High-Speed Rail (HSR) Future Dallas-Fort Worth Core Express Service HSR (DFWCES) Future Dallas-Fort Worth Core EET STR MAIN T E T E NU ENU MAI MAIN E U AVEN T E AV D AV EET N STR S D 2N DART LRT (D2) Future Dallas-Houston High-Speed Rail (HSR) Future Dallas-Houston FAIR PARK EL D D AR VAR E EV UL OUL B BO EZ VEZ A AV CH R CH A AR ES CES S N S 2N STO GA SC ENUE IC AV PACIF ET STRE ELM T TREE S ELM DART Light Future DARTRail LRTTransit (D2) (LRT) MER CE S TREE EXPO T SITIO N AV ENU E EET M STR Lowers the profile where it is elevated or at grade to allow a The scenario identifies a deck park opportunity at Fair Park. the If local partners support and fund a deckMake park, significant below-grade facility from east of I-45 to Dolphin Street. redevelopment opportunities could be realized. connection to the Reconnects Fair Park to Deep Ellum and East Dallas the impactsCBD-Fair of neighborhoods, providing an opportunity to reinvigorate the Requires a thorough understanding of Unbuilt gentrification and historic preservation. historic cultural center of Dallas. Park Link PotentialDevelopment Development Planned DART Light Rail Transit (LRT) Planned Development COM REET ELM ST E UE NU E EN AV K AV K N UN RU T TR ENUE IC AV PACIF T E TREE TRE LD S LD S S FIE S FIE T Direct Connector Ramps Potential Development UE VEN NA S Direct On/OffConnector Ramps Ramps ET EE STRE STR IFFINRIFFIN N GR N G EE STO REET ELM ST T STREE MAIN T E TREESTRE VAY SRVAY N ER N E ST R ER E LA TIM XPY ER EX PY UE VEN NA GA IC PACIF ET EET STREL STR PAULT PAU N ST N S AK LA TIM S PE OD EETTREET US STRUS S OWD OWD N CR N CR On/Off ExpressRamps Lanes S SW EET EET Y STRRY STR HENR HEN Roads, and Cross Streets Express Lanes S IS T E OD GO AV EETTREE AY STR RAY S MURRMUR Improved Streets, Frontage I-30 Roads, and Cross Streets Improved Streets, Frontage NU GO E U EN ET EET STRE STR LTONALTON S WA S W AV E SW E AV D VARD VAR OUXLEBOULE X BLM LCOLM ALCO N MA N M MAP LEGEND I-30 S IS ET EET R RE ST E ST IV OL UE EN AV RR Y E NU D RW ST OO REE T D ST RE ET E IV BA RW OO HA OL MAP LEGEND HA Eliminates the contraflow high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane and Increases capacity to mitigate congestion and reduces operational 345 implements a 2 lane reversible express lane system. Existing expense over today’s facility. 3451 HOV lane configuration provides 4 general purpose lanes and Phase 2B: in the peak direction with three lanes in the off-peak direction. DOLPHIN ROAD L OL RR CA S TEXAS N CA N 366 TEXAS 366 DI D CA EV AR OA K S ST RE TRE ET ET UL LI VE BO OA K R Bringing Investment South Scenario examines two highway configurations. One version Adds missing frontage roads and cross-street connections where provides four general purpose lanes in each direction. The other possible. Changes access routes to existing destinations in Deep Ellum and Fair Park. has five general purpose lanes in each direction. LI VE GE BR BR YA YA N N S ST RE TRE ET ET UN MOBILITY/CONGESTION RELIEF SAMUELL GRAND PARK WINSLOW AVENUE M Construction 10 Years DALLAS CITYMAP I-30 RELOCATE SCENARIO AT-A-GLANCE MOBILITY/CONGESTION RELIEF MAP LEGEND CityMAP Route - Relocation corridor evaluated as part of this study (comprised of multiple route segments) Transformational scenario features the complete relocation of I-30 between I-35E in Downtown Dallas and Ferguson Road near White Rock Creek, and potential removal of a segment of I-45 and I-345. East Route - East of White Rock Creek and south of the Trinity River West Route - West of White Rock Creek along east side of the railroad corridor US 175 Segment - Along US 175 Corridor The new I-30 alignment, from west to east, would proceed from the I-35E on a route between Riverfront Boulevard and the Union Pacific Railroad and proceed southeastward to the planned interchange between I-45 and US 175. East of I-45, I-30 would consist of lanes added to US 175 and would operate with a joint designation (I-30/US 175). I-30 would diverge from US 175 through an interchange near South Second Avenue and Bruton Road, proceeding northward on the east side of White Rock Creek until rejoining the current I-45 / Riverfront Segment - Along I-45 to Railroad and Riverfront corridor Repositioned Properties Potential Routes I-30 alignment near Samuell Boulevard just west of the I-30/ Ferguson Road Interchange. Relocating I-30 would change long established travel patterns to Baylor Hospital and Fair Park and have impacts to the existing freeway network system as well a local roadway system in southern Dallas County. The existing I-30 ROW would be reconstructed to include a major thoroughfare in a boulevard configuration. The accommodation of six traffic lanes in the former freeway right of way would leave ample room for a linear green, contextsensitive facility to include urban design amenities, pedestrian accommodations, bicycle facilities and other opportunities in response to community input. LIVABILITY/QUALITY OF LIFE The relocated I-30 would impact existing neighborhoods, businesses and significant natural areas along the White Rock Creek and Trinity River corridors. These impacts and alternative alignments would require substantial study. Relocating I-30 would expand the potential of the downtown central business district that has been traditionally defined as the area “inside the loop” with potential expansion of the urban core south and east. The existing I-30 right of way would replace the existing freeway with a new boulevard connecting with the city street grid. This would allow improved walkability and neighborhood linkages. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/GROWTH The repurposing of the I-30 Canyon by the Convention Center and Farmers Market would allow Dallas to have a new downtown center taking advantage of the DART light rail and potential HSR service. Structured parking could be depressed into the Canyon, topped with mixed use towers with street level lobbies and retail. I-30 CONCEPT DRAWING Source: Adapted from a drawing by Patrick Kennedy SCENARIO DETAILS The relocation of I-30 would impact highway dependent uses along the current corridor. A major boulevard, in I-30’s place, would remain heavily trafficked conducive to retaining and attracting neighborhood retail and office uses. The construction footprint of relocated I-30 would be minimized to reduce impacts to natural environment features. Much of the highway would be elevated on structure and would not include frontage roads. SCENARIO LIMITS: I-35E in Downtown to I-30 at Ferguson Road SCENARIO FACILITY CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE Under $100M M = Million $100M - 499M $500M - 999M $1B - 2B Over $2B B = Billion SCENARIO LENGTH: 10 miles +/- SCENARIO TIMELINE Identify Need Needs Assessment Advanced Planning Environmental & Design Studies Detail Design ROW, Utilities Scenario Timeline Estimate - 2017 thru 2040 24 Years* *Includes two-year period to add to Metropolitan Transportation Plan NEW BOULEVARD AT FARMERS MARKET DRAFT 6/8/16 Construction MASTER ASSESSMENT PROCESS 9 1│INTRODUCTION 8 DALLAS CITYMAP I-35E THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY SCENARIO AT-A-GLANCE HHI IC HI CKK C OORR KOR YYSS Y TRTR STR EEEE EE TT T DDAA D WWS AW SOO S NN S ON STT S RREE TRE EETT ET SCENARIO COST ESTIMATE: ADDITIONAL FACILITY CAPITAL COSTS BY OTHERS: SR IVE TBD SS RRIV RF RO NT BO IVEER UL RFFR EV ROON AR NTT B D BOOU ULLEV EVAR ARD D MOST CONGESTED ROADWAYS IN TEXAS RANK: 22 ET EET T RE TRTREE ST SS Y YY VA VAVA ER EERR SS Facilty Capital Cost (TxDOT) $662 Million S 2 miles CEE S ENNC ARRE CCLLA ALAL AL LILIP LI PSS P CCOO SCO MMB M B W B WA W AY Y AY MMCC M KKEE CKE EESS E TRTR STR EEEE EE TT T CCAA C DDI IZ ADI Z SS Z TRTR STR EEEE EE TT T SCENARIO LENGTH: C ED GE W OO EED D DGGE ST EWW OOO ODD SST T 175 175 Facility Capital Cost (TxDOT) $191 Million ADDITIONAL FACILITY CAPITAL COSTS BY OTHERS: $50 Million -$150 Million ANNUAL HOURS OF DELAY PER MILE: 359,414 䘀爀漀渀琀愀最攀 刀漀愀搀 ANNUAL COST OF DELAY: $46.44 Million 䘀爀漀渀琀愀最攀 刀漀愀搀 Needs Assessment Advanced Planning MASTER ASSESSMENT PROCESS Environmental & Design Studies Detail Design ROW, Utilities ASAS A HH L SH LAA L NNEE ANE PAPA P RRKK ARK RROO RO WW W AVAV A ENEN VEN UUEE UE BBEE B LLLLE ELL EVV E IEIEWW VIEW SSTT S RREE TRE EETT ET ET EET T RE TRTREE ST SS DD AARR AAKK SS D AR PROJECT COST ESTIMATE: TY PA RK TTR WA RIINNI Y( ITTYY P UN PAAR DE RKKW RS WAAY TU Y ((U DY UNND ) DEER R SST TUUD DYY) ) 10 OOAA O KK L AK LAA L NNEE ANE LOLO L GGAA OGA NN N STST S RREE TRE ETET ET AT LA NT A ST ET AATTL RE E LAAN R ET NTTA ST AS TT BS STTR E OM TREEE REEE O C SSTR ETT S BBS OMM CCOOO PY XXPPYY EX EE ER EERR TIM ATAITMIM LA LL DD OD OOO GGO SS PA RK AV EN PPA UE ARRK K AV AVE ENNU UEE GO K ETT REEE ST R KK ST S SSUU S LLLL ULL IVIVA I ANN VAN DDRR D IVIVE RIV E E G GA A G NNOO ANO STST S RREE TRE ETET ET MMC M CKK C EEEE KEE STST S RREE TRE ETET ET T EE R ST Construction 6 Years AT LA NT A AAT ST TLLA RE ANNT ET TAA S STTR REEE ETT SSOO S UUT T OUT HH B H BOO B MMA M UUL L OUL ARR A EVEV E TITNIN RTIN ARAR VAR LULU LU DD D THTH TH EERR ER KKI IN KI NGG NG J JRR JR BB B BBEE B AAUU EAU MMOO MO NNTT N SSTT T ST HHI IC HI RREE R CKK C EETT EET OORR KOR YYSS Y TRTR STR EEEE EE TT T LELEA LE ARR AR SSTTR ST CCOO C REE RE RRI IN ORI E ETT ET NTT N HH S TH STTR ST REE R EETT EET RRI IC RI CHH CH AARR A DDSS RDS OONN ON AVAVE AV E E KKEE KE LLLLY LL Y AA Y VVEE AVE NNUU NU EE E GGAA G NNOO ANO STST S RREE TRE ETET ET UE UUEE EN VVEENN AV AA N NN ISO RRISISOO ARR HHA D DD AR ARR EV LLEEVVA UL U U BO BBOO ET ETT EZ VVEEZZ RE TRTREE AV A A ST S CH RCCHH DS OD R OOD SSAA WO RRWWOO CEE AR AA SSC S H SSHH AR RR ES HA SC PA RK AV EN PPA UE ARRK K AV AVE ENNU UEE M EY ER S MM ST EEY RE YEER E RSS SST TRRE EEET JE FF RI ES JJE ST EFFF RE FRRI M ET IEES E S RL SS M STTR IN AL REEE S CO MME TR ETT SS LM ERRL EE MM T AAL X LIINN S M BO ST LCCO YR UL TRRE OLLM TL EV EEET MX E ST AR T MM XB YYR BOOU RE D RTTL ULLE ET LEE EVVA SST ARRD TRRE D EEET T CCL L C ARAR LAR EENN E CCEE NCE SST T S RREE TRE ALAL AL EET T ET LILIP LI PSS P CCOO SCO MMB M B W B WA W AY Y AY HHI IC HI CKK C OORR KOR YYSS Y TRTR STR EEEE EE TT T SSAAN SA NTTA NT A FF A EEAA FE A VVEEN VE NUU NU EE E DDAA D WWS AW SOO S NN S ON STT S RREE TRE EETT ET SSAAN SA NTTA NT A FF A F EEAA E A VVEEN VE NUUE NU E E SST T S LOLO T LO UUI IS U S S IS ST T S RREE TRE EET T ET CCOO C RRSS ORS ICICA I ANN CAN AA S A ST T S RREE TRE ETET ET HHAA HA LLLL LL STST S RREE TRE ETET ET BBRR B YAYA RYA NN S N ST T S RREE TRE ETET ET LILIV LI VE E VE OOAA O KK S AK ST T S RREE TRE ETET ET CCAA C NNT T ANT OONN ON SST T S RREE TRE CCAA C EET T ET DDI IZ ADI Z S Z ST T ST RREE RE EET T ET PY XXPPYY EX EE ER EERR TIM ATAITMIM LA LL DD OD OOO GGO SS S ST PA UL SS ST SST RE T PA PAU ET ULL SST TRRE EEET T S ER VA YS TR SS EER EE RVVA T AYY S STTR REEE ETT AK ST SS LLA RE AMMA ET ARR S STTR S REEE AU ETT ST IN SS ST AAU RE USST ET TIINN SST TRRE EEET T EE UE NUU EN ENE AV AVAV TST 11S UEE ENNU ET AVVE RE SSEE A I ST UI LLOOU ON T EEEET WS R A ET D SSTTR RE OONN ST S WS RY T O E DDAAW E ET CK TRRE HI Y SST ET OORRY RE K C ST HHIICK S TT RI E R E R EE FE STTR ISS S RRRI FFEER Opportunity to link existing educational institutions and facilities to future mixed-use development and existing residential neighborhoods. S AR T TT EE EEEE TR TRTR L S LL LSS AA WW M AL W LA T 1S GO T ET ETE RE TRTREE ST SS D RRD KAA AKA SS N Scenario Timeline Estimate - 2016 thru 2021 1│INTRODUCTION EE UE NUU EN ENE AV AVAV NDD 22N NN E AV The scenario identifies three deck park opportunities. A preferred location has not been determined. If local partners support and fund a deck park, significant redevelopment opportunities would be realized. S D AR AK 11 miles Identify Need 9 D 2N E NU ISE U LO T EE TR YS TT OR E K EE C TRRE HI Y SST ORRY CK O HHIICK I FF CCOM OMM MEE EXPO SITIO NA EEXPO XPOSIT SITIO IONN A A CH ES TN UT CCH ST HEES RE STTN ET NUUT T SST TRRE EEET T FACILITY DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION DURATION DRAFT 6/8/16 N E UE UUE EN VEVENN AV AA K NKK UN UUN TR TRTR SS PY XXPPYY EX EE ER EERR TIM ATAITMIM LA LL DD OD OOO GGO SS S HHOO H UUSST OUS TOON TO N SS N S TTRRE TR EEET EE T VV T JEJEFF JEF IAIADD VIAD FFEER FE UUCC UC RSSO RS TT T ONN ON BBOOU BO ULLE UL EVVA EV ARRD AR D VV D V IAIADD IAD UUCCT UC T T S EETSTR EEEETT AY STRAY AYS TR MURR MMUURRRR EET TREEEETT US STR USSSSTR OWD OWWDDU N CR NNCCRRO EET TREEEETT Y STR YSSTR HENR HHEENNRRY EET R STR TAYLO EEEETT RR SSTR TR O YL TA TAYLO BA YL OR ST BBA RE AYYL ET LOOR ES RS STTR TN REEE UT CCH ETT S TR HEES EE STTN T NUUT T SST TRRE EEET T CH GO D EK PROJECT LENGTH: INI 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 CANTO ET STREEET TON N STR CCAN ANTO I-35E From Reunion Boulevard to US 67 US 67 from I-35E to I-20 SCENARIO LIMITS: ET RE ST CE T EN I-35E From Colorado Boulevard to Clarendon Drive EEEET R R LA STTR TR 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 ME Preserves and improves the 10th Street connection under I-35E, linking the 10th Street Historic District to the Jefferson Corridor. E S ER VAY ET STR RE EET ST E SS ER TT E E V E R VAAYY ST I RREEEBRO STRREE R T G ST EETT W NN S D I ER F BBR IFFFI ST ROOW GGRRI R WD DEER EET RS STTR ET REEE RE ETT ST N T A TT EEEET A R H TTR S W S PO ANN TTTA HAAT WH PPOOW R ST W ETT W IF REEE GR STTR IINN S F IFFF GGRRI S 刀攀瘀攀爀猀椀戀氀攀 䔀砀瀀爀攀猀猀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 S HA RW OO SS HHA D ST ARRW R WO OOOD EET DS STTR REEE ETT TW EE FIN COM OVERALL TXDOT PROJECTSCENARIO DETAILS DETAILSSCENARIO DETAILS (INCLUDED IN OVERALL TXDOTIN PROJECT) (INCLUDED OVERALL TXDOT PROJECT) PROJECT LIMITS: 刀攀瘀攀爀猀椀戀氀攀 TRINITY RIVER 䠀伀嘀 䰀愀渀攀 TOWNVIEW CENTER EXISTING CROSS-SECTION 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䘀爀漀渀琀愀最攀 刀漀愀搀 S RIV ERFR ONT 刀攀瘀攀爀猀椀戀氀攀 BLVD SS RIV RIVEERFR RFROONT 䠀伀嘀 䰀愀渀攀 NT BBLVD LVD 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䘀爀漀渀琀愀最攀 刀漀愀搀 刀攀瘀攀爀猀椀戀氀攀 䔀砀瀀爀攀猀猀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䘀爀漀渀琀愀最攀 刀漀愀搀 BR OW DE BBR R ST ROOW WD DEER RS STT EETT E STR TREE MERRCCE S CCOOM MME EET N STR ET RE ST OR EETT YL E A RE T STTR ORR S YL O TTAAYL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/GROWTH HHO EE T OTTE ELL S STTR REEE ETT 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 IL MAR REEETT LA SSTTRE AARRIL ILLA M M EET STR RCE ME COM S AR EV ET ETT STRE STTRREEE MAR MAARRS N LA NNLLAAM RD VVAARRDD EVA E OUL OOUULLE NT B NTTBB FRO FFRROON IVER RRIVIVEERR NN GRIF FIN STR EET GGRIF RIFFFIN IN SSTR TREEET ET SCENARIO CROSS-SECTION 䘀爀漀渀琀愀最攀 刀漀愀搀 REET LA ST Connects the Dallas Zoo to retail/commercial along Jefferson Boulevard. HO TE CRE 䘀爀漀渀琀愀最攀 刀漀愀搀 T REE T TREEEET NG SSTR YYOOUUNG UL LIVABILITY REETT AIN ST STREE M MAIN LIVABILITY/QUALITY OF LIFE G ST N YOU Opportunities to link the Oak Cliff Gateway and Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Tax Increment Financing (TIF) districts. AR CED CityMAP Scenario R ST ON ETT NT REEE SSTTR ONN NTTO CCAAN CA T TT EE EEE TR SSTRTR LS LL AR EEAARR PE PP NN S JACK REEEETT N SSTTR ET CKKSSOON STRE JA JACW OOD T TTRREEEET S D OO D S W WOO Lowers the profile where it is at grade to below grade. YVONNE A. EWELL Overall Southern Gateway Project N T TREE ON S EET STR MAIN The scenario provides improved pedestrian and bicycle facilities across the freeway, linking neighborhoods with future development. T EE D DD AR AARR EV LELEVV UL UU BO BBOO EZ VVEEZZ AV AA CH CCHH AR AARR ES CCEESS SC SS REETT AIN ST STREE M MAIN LS TR 䘀爀漀渀琀愀最攀 刀漀愀搀 ET EETT STRE SSTTRREE PAUL PPAAUULL N ST NNSSTT T STREE EET M STRREET EL ELM ST ET TREEEETT STRE STR LTON LTOONNS S WA SSWWAALT T ET ETE RE TRTREE ST SS E EE IV ILVIV OOL T T TREE TTRREEEET VAY S VAAYYSS N ER NNEERRV MAIN BO REUN ET STREEET OODD STR W WOO STREET G YOUN REETT G STTREE NG S YYOOUUN ET ETT STRE SSTTRREEE RKET RKKEETT S MA SSMMAAR REET REEEETT N ST TONNSSTTR USTO USSTO S HO SSHHOOU L DR LDDRR OTE OTTEEL CY H CYYHHO GEN GEENNC T RE TRREEG HYAT HHYYAATT E 7TH STREET LVD ION B LVD ION BBLVD NION RREEUUN AVENU E REET Parks Open Potential Parks and andParks Open Spaces Spaces REETT AIN ST STREE M MAIN E STREET MERC COM EETT E STR TREE MERRCCE S CCOOM MME Scenario approach minimizes the footprint, keeping within the current ROW where possible. D ST WOO DART Station Streetcar Streetcar Streetcar Extention AVENUE DART Parks Station and Open Spaces DART Station Potential Potential Parks Parks EETT E STR TREE MERRCCE S CCOOM MME G N MARSALIS NR SALIS DALLAS ZOO E 8TH STREET S MAR E Railway Trinity Trinity Railway Railway Express Express Railway Streetcar Railway EET E STR MERC COM N ZA IV ET STRREEET EELLM M ST N DR UE T T TREE TRREEEET LD S LDDSST S FIE SSFFIEIEL Dallas-Houston Future Future DART DART LRT LRT (D2) (D2) High-Speed Rail (HSR) Future Future Dallas-Houston Dallas-Houston High-Speed Rail High-Speed Rail (HSR) (HSR) Future Dallas-Fort Worth Core LAKE CLIFF Express Service HSR (DFWCES) Future Worth PARK Future Dallas-Fort Dallas-Fort Worth Core Core Express Service HSR Trinity Railway Express ServiceExpress HSR (DFWCES) (DFWCES) D AR EV N REET ELM ST Improved roadway geometry at the “Zang Curve”, improved ramp design and improved shoulders are safety enhancements. E ENUUE IC AAVVEN IFIC PPAACCIF REET ELM ST The addition of a general purpose lane in each direction and the addition of two reversible express lanes will provide congestion relief and accommodate increased development activity in the Southern Sector. DART Future DARTRail LRTTransit (D2) (LRT) DART Light Light Rail Transit (LRT) L OU DO E U AVEN EET M STRREET EL ELM ST REET ST MAIN AVEN ENUUEE AVEN IFIC AV PPAC ACIFIC STREET ELM ET ETT STRE SSTTRREEE IFFIN IFFFININ N GR NNGGRRIF B ON RS EN IC PACIF Potential Development Planned PotentialDevelopment Development DART Light Rail Transit (LRT) Planned Development Planned Development FE AR IC PACIF The I-35E and US 67 plans included in the CityMAP scenario are functionally equivalent to the current plans under development by TxDOT. Direct Connector On/Off Ramps On/Off Ramps Ramps Direct Connector Ramps Potential Development Direct Connector Ramps EF EJ CL GO OD LA TIM GGO ER OOOD EX D LA LAT PY TIIM MER ER E EXXP PYY E NUUE SW VEEN AV SA IISSS SSWW UE VEN NA STO GA UUEE N VE N N AAVE STOON GGAAST 345 345 345 OL W 12TH STREET Improved Streets, Frontage I-30 I-30 I-35E Roads, and Cross Streets Improved Improved Streets, Streets, Frontage Frontage Roads, Cross Express Lanes Roads, and and Cross Streets Streets On/Off Express Lanes ExpressRamps Lanes S ZANG BOULEVARD E AV MOBILITY/CONGESTION RELIEF MAP I-30 MAP LEGEND LEGEND S BECKLEY AVENUE E TEXAS TEXAS MAP LEGEND E NU S IS VARUD VARRDD LEVA LE ULE X BOLM XXBBOOU LCOLM LCOOLM N MA NNMMAALC N HA RW OO NN D HHA ST ARRW RE WO ET OOOD DS STTR REEE ETT 366 TEXAS 366 366 OO D TEXAS N ST RE ET HI HI CK CK OR OR YS YS TR TR EE EE T T T ST RE E N DA W SO T ST RE E N DA W SO ST RE EE ET T HI CK OR Y AS D ST W TRS RE EOEN ET TS SA SA TR NT NT EE AF AF T EA EA VE VE NU NU E E HI CK OR YS TR EE T DA W SO N ST R HI CK OR Y T LA NE OA K EY EE LA NE EE T ER S LA NE DA W SO N ST R DA W SO N ST R AS H EY JE ER FF M ER ES T ST R LA NE FF T T LA NE H LIVABILITY/QUALITY OF LIFE ST R ST R EE T AS T EE Overall, the addition of a C-D system would greatly improve this downtown section of I-35E and would capitalize further on the improvements now under construction with the Horseshoe Project. EE OA K T EE ST R AN LO G The addition of northbound and southbound C-D roadways between Commerce Street/Woodall Rodgers and the direct connector ramps to DNT would eliminate many of the weaving maneuvers on both northbound and southbound I-35E and remove much of the daily congestion caused by weaving and merging traffic. EE ST R JE LI M S RI AS H NT AF SA NU E EA VE E NU EA VE EE M LA NE EA VE NU E OA K ST R NU E HI CK OR Y EA VE SA NT AF NT AF SA CO PS W AY B M CO LO G AL AN LI PS ST R EE CL T AR EN AL CE LI ST R EE CL T M B AR EN W AY CE AN LO G NT AF SA T EE ST R E W AY NC The scenario also includes the proposed Circuit Trail Connector project linking the Katy Trail to the Trinity Strand Trail with an elevated crossing over I-35E. The highway operational improvements would require little to no additional ROW and would be less disruptive than a full highway reconstruction approach. LI PS CO M B AV C EN LA UE RE AL RO W BL VD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/GROWTH JR D NG EV AR SO K UT H RO W BO UL AV E NU E EV AR D K PA R PA R W AY PA R K KI HE BL VD JR BO M UL AR EV TI AR N L D U RO W TH ER KI NG AR TIN ES AV E M NU LU T TH OU PS ED R BO UL B M CO GE LI PS BL VD H JR NG KI R HE From Reunion Boulevard to Oak Lawn Avenue AL R ST M EE T D AR TIN Y VA ER CO S M B PROJECT/SCENARIO ST 175 LIMITS: LU T W AY D UT ES TR KE MC W OO SO TS TR ON CK OR YS TR HI AU M BE T EE ST R EE CK M ST RE ET LL HA LI W AY BE T EE T ST R EE NO ST R GA EE CK M T EE ST R NO GA ST RE ET LL HA B BE AU M ST R EE CK M T EE ST R NO GA E IV DR IV AN ST RE ET LL AL AU M ON ON TS TS TR TR HI EE EE CK EE HICK T T T OR OR YS YS T TR RE EE EE E T T T LE LE LE AR AR AR ST ST CO STR CO CO RE RE RI EE RI RI ET ET NT T NT NT H H H ST ST ST R R RE EE EE E T T RI T RI RI CH CH CH AR AR AR DS DS DS ON ON ON AV AV AV E E E K KE KE E LL LL LL YA YA YA VE VE VE NU NU NU E E E M T EE ST R NO GA T EE ST R NO GA T EE T EE ST R NO E GA IV DR IV AN LL LL SU T CO ST LO U E IV DR IV AN LL SU T EE ES TR KE MC T EE ES TR KE MC T EE ST R IEW EE R ST PS ST R IS A AN IC RS SU T EE T EE ST R IEW EV LL EV M M LI T EE T EE ST R ET ST RE Z DI HA HI LIN ED RIV E ST R AN A IC RS CO ET ST RE NT ON ST R IEW EV LL BE BE LL PY BE T N RI AL ST ES CO RE LM ST EMT RE X EY M ET YR S EBRO E RS TL M LUILE NV E AL ST STAR ST C RE RED RE OL ET M E ET T X M BO YR UL J TL EV EFF E ST AR R AT RE D IES LA ET NT ST A RE ST M ET ET R E E RL EE S R M ST I T A N AT L S BS CO LA TR M O N L E M TA ET CO X SMT BO ET RYRE RE UL TELT ST EV E ST AR BS RE D OM ET CO AT LA NT A AT ST LA RE NT ET A AT ST T L E R AN EE RE T T S A T ST BS RE OM ET CO ED GE W OO D ST ED AT GE LA NT W OO A ST D RE ST ET AL T ST R EE T EE ST R EE T EE AN A IC RS CO ET ST RE Z DI ST LO UI S ST R ET ST R CA EE DI T Z ST RE NT ON T ET ST RE NT ON CA CA CA CA CO LI ST RE ET OA K VE LI ST RE ET OA K VE LI CA ST LO UI S OA K VE ST RE ET BR YA N ST RE ET BR YA N ST RE ET BR YA N T EE ZS TR DI CA T EE ST R EX ZS TR UT ER DI TIM LA CA OD T GO EE S ZS TR ES TN PY PY EX EX ER ER TIM TIM LA LA E OD NU GO AVE N ISO RR S DI E OD HA R LA T CA E NU E NU E GO CE EN EE US TO NS TR EE EE TV TV JEF IAD IAD I A DU FER FE FE UC U RS RS C C T T T SON ON ON B BO BO OU UL UL L EV EV EV AR AR AR DV DV DV IAD IAD IAD UC UC UC T T T E AV E AV NU S T EE R ST TV T 1S D 2N E AV T R ST T Y VA ER JEF E N N N RE A S JEF NU E NU E AV E AV ENU CH S ISO R ST EE HO T 1S D 2N UE EN AV N AV The scenario location is175experiencing significant growth in Boulevard at planned developments near Continental Avenue. These developments would have a strong orientation towards development, particularly in Victory and the Design District. Further growth is poised175to occur along the new Riverfront the planned Trinity Lakes and should increase pedestrian and bicycle activity. CL R ST ST R E N T SITIO T EE E RR ET EE CE Y VA ER US TO N NU E NU E AV E AV UE EN AV K UN TR MER CE S TREE MOBILITY/CONGESTION RELIEF EXPO T ST R EE NU HA T R ST C E S T EE HO T 1S D 2N K UN TR UT E AV T R ST RS TU COM TXDOTECONOMICS PROJECT/CITYMAP SCENARIO DETAILS VA R DE ES TN C D LE T R ST E CE EN R LA NU VA R OU R ST EE K EE AV E E The I-35E highway and the parallel the DART/ Trinity Railway Express (TRE) are dominant visual boundaries. Much of their profiles are elevated relative to crossing streets. R ST K EE CH T N EEK D PA R ENU T EE K D R VA O WO AR E T EE K CR LE AV E NU SH D TB UE STR EN N AV SO SE DAW TLE TUR K E OU E PA R ST R EE T D NU NU ST R T EE D AV E R VA LE K ST R EE ISO R VA OU ZB T ET Z B EE RE VE ST CHA OD AR WO ES AR S C SH R ST PA R AV E UT E NU E AV EE LE D O WO AR K E AV SH PA R HI N AV The scenario focus is on improving pedestrian and bicycle LIVABILITY linkages crossing I-35E at Oak Lawn Avenue, Hi Line Drive, DART Victory connection, Continental Avenue, Commerce Street and Reunion Boulevard. TR YS OR CK CH E ES TN RR AR NU OU ZB ES SC E AV AV E CH ES TN HA PY CH E T EE R ST RY KO IC AR T AR AK LE T EE EX ES NU K SITIO The direct freeway connection between westbound Woodall Rodgers and northbound DNT would be eliminated. Traffic from US 75 North Central Expressway and the CBD destined for northbound DNT would use existing thoroughfare routes. H SC AV E REET EXPO CH UT ET RE ET ST RE ORY ST N HICK O T WS ET EE DA RE TR ST S S RY RRI O E U CK FE HI EN AV ET SE RE UI ST LO T IS EE RR R E F ST ON WS T DA EE TR YS OR CK I H ET RE ST S RI R FE ER TIM LA K PA R S Y OD GO EE EE N UE EN AV S P EX HI S PA R ET STRE ER TIM LA PA UL AY MURR Y P EX OD GO R ST T ET STRE LTON S WA S D AR OU RF PROJECT/SCENARIO LENGTH: DY ) SR ER TIM LA AK TB RO N OD GO T RO N IL EE ST R EE RF S S NE HSIT S R ST AU ST IN EXISTING CROSS-SECTION IVE EET RY AR A TR D T ST R K UN TR T SCITIO OMM N EAV RE CN E USET The Collector-Distributor (C-D) roadways would collect and distribute traffic between intersecting roads such as Woodall Rodgers, Lamar/Continental, Hi Line, the Dallas North Tollway and the freeway main lanes. REVERCHON PARK TY KA AR S KLYDE WARREN PARK EE SR NUE TR LS S T ST Y AVE AL W D EL FI EE T E RE R US TIN STR EE ST T RE ET S AU ST IN ST RE ET S LA M AR ST RE ET EET UI LO Proposed Klyde Warren Deck Park Expansion TR LS TEXAS S LAM A A T S S AK EE AL W T ST R T EE AR EE 366 M TR LS LS TR S STR Y T BO Perot Museum of Nature and Science LA T P EX UL E S ER VAY TR SS N TREE S S CAN TR YS OR CK D AR EV ST BR H RE O SE G EOW ET AMERICAN RVA S ET DE N H DE W Y ST ST R RE REE ETAIRLINES CENTER R ST PA ST T ST TRE RE UL PIKE PARK N S I F ET ST BR IN IF RE IFF OW GR ET ET GR DE RE R ST ST N A RE TT T A E E T H W T RE S ER PO E S ER EE VA ST S VAY ET YS W STR ST STR N RE TR ET AN T E O PA E ET EE S R T UL T ST ATST IN NN I S BR IN OWHD FF S I F K R ER TRE IF P L OW C G R E V G AY ET M DE FI ST R N RE ST ET RE ET T EE R AD RO ST CEDAR SPRINGS AN TT HA W S ER PO VA YS TR MCK EE INNE T F RI ER TIM LA T ET TO US AL W US TO N MER CE S TREE EXPO The transportation network configuration of I-35E in this scenario reflects the current TxDOT plan to add collectordistributor roadways between Woodall Rodgers SH 366 and the Dallas North Tollway (DNT). R TON ST EE R STR TAYLO T ST R COM BA YL OR HA RW OO E R ST TAYLO OD GO D T EE REET ST R EE CH T ES BA T YL EET NUT OR ST ST RE R ET EE CH T ES TN UT ST RE ET E STR MERC UI LO R VA LE EE EE R ST REET S OR YL TA U BO S D N FI T EE BA YL OR REET N ST CANTO SE R ST EET E STR T ERC MM OEE CR N ST D T EE HO COM S CO T E STRE ET ET STRE RAY STRE MUR RCE MME CANTO R ST TAYLO T STREE U OWD N CR R VA LE ST R T STREE EET EET US STR US STR OWD N CROWD N CR U BO EE R ST EET EET Y STR ENRY STR H HENR D T T EE R ST MAIN EET PY Y STRPY EX HENR EX ER ER IM IM AT AT R VA LE D R ST OR YL TA EZ AV CH T T EE OR YL TA U BO EZ AV CH ST R L L D OD OD R GO VA S GO S LE OU KB ST MAIN REET ELM ST E RE EZ AV CH T EE TR LS E E E RE CA EE RW OO PY NU T ON NT AR ES SC AR PE HA Y FW ONS M STEM ET T EE TR SN N AVE TO AR ES SC S EX C LE RT TU AR ES SC N R ST FR W HO TE PA R UN D STR ILLA MAR LAW N T EE TR LS D S IVE KW AY ( AR PE AR T E TY N T AK RSOTRE DG ET ER U AVEN INI T EE TR LS EE S D SR TR TW EE GRAIFL FLIN IC PACIF UN DE RS S RIV ERFRTUD PA RK ONTY) BLVD WA Y( UN DE RS TU DY ) ST R STE ENN U RBRY AV FFI VICTO OW GRI W OO T T TY R ET ET HA RW OO IL MAR N AVE AK N TO S REET LA ST LA TIM N CA AR PE T R ST T LS TR EE E STRE INI DE STR E STR E AG IL T ST BR OW T EE R ST ON REET LA ST REE G ST N YOU R D AR AK E STRE FIN ST DE EE S MAR GRIF T E RE N STOO EET MAR OD ER GA E STR MERC T S AV CA DR T COM REE G ST BR OW R ST FIN HO TE LS TR ELM KW AY ( TR UM OC SL D AR AK GRIF N LA T EET PA R REET GO UE 345 N T E STRE S ET ET STRE STRE MAR N LA E STRE N STR TY T E STRE MAI ELM ST E IS STREE T REE G ST T MAR N LA RKET USTO INI BLV MAIN N YOU REE EET S MA S HO TR R D LAMA D N YOU S JACK Y ERFR ONT N RO RF VE T TREE ON S H S RIV PY STO GA SW EET E STR MERC EET COMMAIN STR E ENU IC AV PACIF EET E STR MERC COM EET R ST ELM AR EV TB I T ET R STREE STREN D MAIN WOO D WOO EE BLVD EET N STR EX VEN NA U EN ET RE ST T E STR MERC EET G STR T TREE ON S OUST ERFR ONT 345 E U AVEN T STREE MAINSTREET ELM L OU ST PAUL EET D STR T WOO E STRE SON K C JA COM HO TE S RIV REET ELM ST ER UE REEET ELMAST ENU IC V PACIF E IV EET N STR T TREE LD S S FIE STR IFFIN T E STRE T STREE T TREE VAY S N ER GE RID N GR GE EET T STREE SO JACK EE E STR MERC T TREE S ELM COM T N ST B IAN UE EE ET EET STRE AUL STR P PAUL N ST TR ES ED MAIN EET EN IFIC AV PAC MAIN E STR MERC COM ST R N ST T E STRE D IC PACIF ET RE ST RW OO OL T T TREE TREE LD S S FIELD S S FIE NT T E PEET TREE INVSTR RIFFIN S IFFA NG N GRAL ELM E IV HA T ET TREE STRE VAY S N ERVAY N ER INE D RD RD VAR EVA EVA ULE OUL OUL T BO NT B NT B RON FRO FRO IVER IVER NR NR REUNION TOWER AR ET P STRE Y ELMAVENUEIT IC IN PACIF TR RID LB HIL F IVER LVD ( AY KW EET G STR YOUN YOUN Potential Parks ION B REUN T R DE UN UE AVEN IC PACIF E STRE EET G STREET YOUND STR WOO D WOO Parks and Open Spaces PY LA TIM AY MURR OL NT CO DART Station LVD D WOO ET EET STRE T STR RKET S MARKE S MA NR Streetcar ION B REUN EET EET N STR N STR USTO S HOUSTO Railway Parks Potential LVD ION B REUN S HO Parks Open Spaces Trinity and Railway Express UNT ET H L DR L DR L DR OTE OTE REEYTHOTE CY H C CY H CE ST GEN GEN GEN MER T RE T RE T RE W COYM HYAT H AT HYAT Streetcar Trails Parks Open Spaces Futureand Dallas-Fort Worth Core DART Station Express Service Potential Parks HSR (DFWCES) R RGA MA Planned Development Future DART LRT (D2) Collector-Distributor Express Lanes DART Rail Transit (LRT) Future Dallas-Houston On/OffLight Ramps High-Speed Future DARTRail LRT(HSR) (D2) Direct Connector Ramps Future Dallas-Fort Worth Core Dallas-Houston Potential Development Express Service High-Speed Rail HSR (HSR)(DFWCES) Planned Development Trinity Railway Express Future Dallas-Fort Worth Core DART Light Rail Transit (LRT) Express Service HSR (DFWCES) Railway Future DART LRT (D2) Trinity Railway Express Streetcar Future Dallas-Houston Railway DART StationRail (HSR) High-Speed OD DALLAS CITYMAP I-35E LOWEST STEMMONS SCENARIO AT-A-GLANCE N On/Off Roads, Ramps and Cross StreetsTEXAS Direct Connector Express Lanes Ramps MAP LEGEND On/Off Ramps Potential Development I-30 Direct Connector Ramps Planned Development I-35E MAP LEGEND Improved Streets, Frontage TRINITY RIVER Potential Development DART Rail Transit (LRT) Roads,Light and Cross Streets ET RE ST I-30 MAP LEGEND Improved Streets, Frontage Roads, and Cross Streets I-30 Express ImprovedLanes Streets, Frontage 366 T EX GO ET ET STRE STRE LTON S WALTON S WA EE LA TIM ER EN AV ENUE S IS AV WSTON GSA 345 E IV TEXAS ST R OD UE RD RD RD LEVA LEVA BOULEVA X BO U X X BO U LCOLM LCOLMN MALCOLM N MA N MA D GO A S IS SW T OL RW OO 366 MAP LEGEND ST R EE HA IVE 1.9 miles RF RO N TB OU LE PROJECT/SCENARIO COST ESTIMATE: VA R D Facility Capital Cost (TxDOT) $100 Million SCENARIO CROSS-SECTION ADDITIONAL FACILITY CAPITAL COSTS BY OTHERS: $5 Million -$20 Million MOST CONGESTED ROADWAYS IN TEXAS RANK: 5 ANNUAL HOURS OF DELAY PER MILE: I-35E LOWEST STEMMONS at CONTINENTAL AVENUE 602,114 ANNUAL COST OF DELAY: $62.89 Million FACILITY DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION DURATION Identify Need Needs Assessment Advanced Planning Environmental & Design Studies Detail Design ROW, Utilities Scenario Timeline Estimate - 2016 thru 2021 DRAFT 6/8/16 MASTER ASSESSMENT PROCESS 11 1│INTRODUCTION Construction 6 Years 10 DALLAS CITYMAP I-345/I-45 MODIFY SCENARIO AT-A-GLANCE MOBILITY/CONGESTION RELIEF GO ER T EE ST R N T LE EE AL N LE K ST RE EE ET T AL AR JA CK ST R JA CK EV EV AN AN S S ST ST RE RE ET ET ET ST RE ET ST R K T EE ST R T LL ST R EE LL HA N HA N PE AR L N ST RE PY EX ER M PY LA TI EX OD ER M GO S HA RW RW OO OO D D ST ST RE RE ET ET HA GO N LA TI OD EE T ST R T This area is experiencing significant development growth, particularly near Live Oak and near the Farmers Market. T EE E NU E AV OD S T S E NU E AV ER EE OA K Y P EX TIM LA R ST The new park under I-345 would offer open space and amenities that would attract additional development. K OA UE UE EN EN AV AV ON ON ST ST GA PY EX SCENARIO DETAILS TIM LA R ST S A S 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 GA 刀愀洀瀀 刀愀洀瀀 T ST RE BR ET YA N ST RE ET EE IS SW 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 EE ST R E VE IS 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 OA K NU LI SW 刀愀洀瀀 刀愀洀瀀 VE E AV ET ET RE RE ST ST ON ON NT NT CA 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 BR YA N LI JA CI NT O ST JA RE CI ET NT O ST RE ET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/GROWTH Maintains current job commute route from Southern Dallas to jobs along US 75 and I-35E north of the CBD. EXISTING CROSS-SECTION 刀愀洀瀀 刀愀洀瀀 SA N S Z E AV CH CA R SA E SC L U BO SA N E E SC C D AR EV S RO R SA AR EV UL BO Minimizes disruption to small businesses and residents along corridor versus the remove or below grade scenarios during construction. R ST D Z VE HA Ramp removal would also allow Hawkins Street to75be extended under I-345 to Canton Street in alignment75 with Farmers Market Way. A T EE TR LS AR PE T NU N AR PE EE E AV N T ST R S Visibility is improved under the elevated I-345 where ramps are removed. Areas under I-345 and the land formerly used for ramps could be converted to a park connecting with the Carpenter Park planned between Live Oak and Pacific Avenue. NT O UT RO OR FL T TR LS 366 TEXAS 366 T EE R ST The ramp removal and improvements under I-345 will TEXAS improve linkages between Deep Ellum and downtown. EE S RO Analysis Boundary ST RE BR ET YA N ST RE ET EE ET ET STRE STRE ILLA ARILLA M Focus Area Boundary Analysis Boundary T H T T MAR Potential Parks Focus Area Boundary BR YA N ST R EE T EE ST RE ET Parks andParks Open Spaces Potential T The scenario allows for improved bicycle and pedestrian 345 entering connections by removing fast moving vehicular traffic or exiting the street grid from the highway ramps.345 EE ST R EE ST R NT O JA CI R ST R ST ST R ST R N T EE H UT RO T Z OA K SA JA CI OR FL DART Station RSIC STRE ET Parks and Open Spaces AN A DI OA K EE REET REET ELM ST ELM ST CA A VE T T STREE STREE MAIN MAIN AN CO LI EET EET E STR E STR MEROCMMERC C FutureStation DART LRTCORS(D2) DART IC IZ T ET DART Light CA Future DARTRail LRTTransit (D2) (LRT) D VE E E ENU ENU IC AV IC AV PACIF PACIF EE Planned Development ST DART Light Rail Transit (LRT) RE LI COM ST R N E AT ST E NT ON SA T ST EE NU CA T T TREE TREE NG S NG S YOU YOU E AV PotentialDevelopment Development Planned ET STRE PAUL N ST ET E R T S PAUL N ST The modify scenario would lessen the visual impact of I-345 north of the I-30/I-345 Interchange from Canton Street to Elm Street where I-345 “spreads out” to accommodate existing ramps. CA NT ON T EE R ST UE UE EN EN AV AV SS RO ON ST Removed Ramps Potential Development E LL BO LIVABILITY/QUALITY OF LIFE OL SS RO Removed Ramps E GA NU E AV T S MAP LEGEND OL IV T E STRE VAY N ER R ST E RE R ST ST VAY N ER A AK T EE E IV R ST E AT ST T REE E R S ST MAP LEGEND RD S IS EE EX ET LL BO UE UE EN EN AV AV AS AS OM OM TH TH A T R ST T EE Y Y FW FW RS RS GE GE OD OD LR LR AL AL OD OD WO WO D R KA EE SW R ST N E ST R PE AR L E ON NT D O GO PY ET N NU CA EET R E TIM LA OA K N S E AV STR ILLA VE Intersecting major arterial streets would likely experience peak-hour traffic queues and congestion delay. The modify scenario also assumes that new I-45 ramps proposed in the S.M. Wright Phase IIB project are constructed prior to removing the ramps identified in the modify scenario. These new ramps allow I-45 highway access to downtown using Cesar Chavez Boulevard and Good Latimer Expressway from the south. SS RO MA R LI Thoroughfares in East Dallas, Deep Ellum, and the Cedars would all experience significant increases in traffic volumes. CL 345 Another pair of outer ramps is eliminated in this scenario from northbound I-345 to Bryan Street and the southbound I-345 ramp to Live Oak Street. AR 75 CL TEXAS I-345 traffic to the CBD would seek alternate routes and use I-30 and I-45 exits to thoroughfares such as Elm, Main, Commerce and Cesar Chavez. N HA HA RW RW OO OO D D ST ST RE RE ET ET EE T ST R D 366 ST UE AVEN HA RW OO IC PACIF T STREE EET E STR MERC MAIN COM H UT RO The modify configuration is achieved by eliminating the ramp system that provides CBD access to and from Elm Street, Main Street and Commerce Street. N T E RE K OA T EE R ST SCENARIO FACILITY CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE Under 100M M = Million 100M - 499M B = Billion CO S MAL CO S MAL 500M - 999M RD LEVA BOU LM X T TREE TON S S WAL T TREE S N TO S WAL HA ST R HI HA LL S EE ANNUAL HOURS OF DELAY PER MILE: 354,695 LL T ST R T EE R ST 1B - 2B Over 2B MOST CONGESTED ROADWAYS IN TEXAS RANK: 23 S L L HA R ST W AS 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 T EE L L HA N 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 EET EET E STR E STR MEROCMMERC C 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 RD LEVA BOU LM X N W AS HI NG NG TO TO N N AV AV EN EN UE UE COM SCENARIO CROSS-SECTION EET EET N STR N STR CANTO CANTO 刀愀洀瀀 刀愀洀瀀 EET EET R STR R STR TAYLO TAYLO 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 SCENARIO LENGTH: 3.2 miles +/- CBD CBD -FAIR -FAIR PAR P K LINARK LIN K K GO REET REET ELM ST ELM ST OD S T T STREE STREE MAIN MAIN SCENARIO LIMITS: From Hall Street to Lenway Street EE ANNUAL COST OF DELAY: $29.55 Million FACILITY DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION DURATION Identify Need Needs Assessment Advanced Planning Environmental & Design Studies T Detail Design ROW, Utilities Construction POTENTIAL I-345 MODIFY Scenario Timeline Estimate - 2017 thru 2022 DRAFT 6/8/16 11 1│INTRODUCTION 6 Years* 12 *Includes two-year period to add to Metropolitan Transportation Plan MASTER ASSESSMENT PROCESS DALLAS CITYMAP I-345/I-45 REMOVE SCENARIO AT-A-GLANCE T T ST RE E EV AN S R ST E AT ST EE LL T ST RE E T AR L ST RE E PE HA RW OO D N T ST RE E OL I VE N ET ST RE D RW OO HA S PY LA TI M ER EX ST R T T D GO O S E AV E NU R ST R ST Congestion delay experienced on the overall 2040 MTP network would increase, especially on the thoroughfare network. IS T ON ST GA K OA HA The full interchange with I-30 would be replaced with exit and entrance ramps to street grid. T EE E NU REET ET E R ST Reknits historic neighborhood patterns around core of downtown, providing a finer grain urban development pattern and thus more varieties of redevelopment. CBD -FAIR ET STRE LL HA PAR K STREET MERCE Increases local street connectivity within the urban core, providing improved auto, transit, bike and pedestrian access. ELM ST MAIN COM D EVAR X BOUL REET ON ST CANT REET ST TAYLOR S COLM S MAL REET TON ST S WAL LL N ST R The US 75/Woodall Rodgers Interchange would also see a major reconfiguration. The direct connector ramps between Woodall Rodgers and I-345/US 75 would be removed and the main lanes between the two facilities would be connected as the through route. Cesar Chavez would be connected with ramps to US 75. With the removal of I-345, several streets in the CBD would be connected such as Hawkins Street extended to Canton Street in alignment with Farmers Market Way. Intersecting major arterial streets would likely experience peak hour traffic queues and congestion delay. Provides opportunities for increased affordable housing options in the urban core, which would potentially reduce home-to-work commutes on regional highways. E NU N TO NG E AV ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/GROWTH I SH HA Thoroughfares in East Dallas, Deep Ellum, and the Cedars would all experience a major increase in daily traffic volume. LIVABILITY/QUALITY OF LIFE E AV PY EX TIM LA LINK HA S OA K ST R EE ST R EE UE ER D O GO VE EN AV GO T LI SW UE ON ST ER TIM LA BR YA N EE EN AV GA PY EX JA CI NT O ST R EE N ST RE ET N T EE LL ET SA OA K S IS SW ET RE ST ET RE ST ON NT CA S S RE ST ON NT E AV CH AR VE UE CA O ZB E SC N LI EN AV D R VA I-45 would be completely removed north of Martin Luther 75 75 King, Jr. Boulevard north to I-30. The I-45 main lanes would transition into and from Cesar Chavez Boulevard and ramps would connect to and from Good Latimer Expressway. These changes would provide surface street connections between the termination of I-45 and the CBD and US 75 in order to carry the traffic displaced from I-45 and I-345. N SS RO UE P E UL OD A EN AV R EA REET D OR FL S T EE ST ILLA MAR ET STRE ILLA MAR RW OO 345 UE T S RO 345 N C EE T TR LS The scenario would completely remove I-345 including the full interchange with I-30. TEXAS RO ST R R ST EN AV 366 R LA AS R ST T EE K OM TH BR YA N T H UT R ST Y EE T FW EE H UT RO N LE AL UE EE ST R T EE T EE RS GE OD LR ST R AVEN ST R NT O TEXAS T EE R ST L DA OA K IC PACIF NA UE AVEN CA REET ELM ST SI IC PACIF Parks and OpenCOSpaces R Potential Parks T ET STRE EE STREET ST R MAIN Z MERCE DI COM T STREE CA DART Station ET S T Future DART LRT (D2) MAIN G STRE T EE R ST EET E STR MERC C OM YOUN NT ON ST DART Light Rail Transit (LRT) RE E D VE JA CI MOBILITY/CONGESTION RELIEF O WO LI Planned DevelopmentCA N UE Potential Development SA EN AV N UL ST ST PA SS RO REET AR 366 EET STR VAY N ER MAP LEGEND AK ET JA CK RE ST BO A W EE T Changes regional network commuting patterns by shifting local through trips to I-35 to the west and to I-635 to the east. EXISTING CROSS-SECTION 刀愀洀瀀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 刀愀洀瀀 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 刀愀洀瀀 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 刀愀洀瀀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 刀愀洀瀀 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 刀愀洀瀀 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 Provides substantial additional development potential for mixed use office and residential based on potential use of former highway ROW for new development. Necessitates assessment of potential impacts of gentrification and historic preservation as the removal of the elevated I-345 will bring together the different development patterns of Deep Ellum and the CBD. SCENARIO DETAILS SCENARIO LIMITS: From Hall Street to Lenway Street SCENARIO CROSS-SECTION 䔀砀挀攀猀猀 刀伀圀 ⠀倀漀琀攀渀琀椀愀氀 䐀攀瘀攀氀漀瀀洀攀渀琀⤀ 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 䔀砀挀攀猀猀 刀伀圀 ⠀倀漀琀攀渀琀椀愀氀 䐀攀瘀攀氀漀瀀洀攀渀琀⤀ 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 SCENARIO LENGTH: 3.2 miles +/SCENARIO FACILITY CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE Under $100M M = Million $100M - 499M $500M - 999M $1B - 2B Over $2B B = Billion MOST CONGESTED ROADWAYS IN TEXAS RANK: 23 ANNUAL HOURS OF DELAY PER MILE: 354,695 ANNUAL COST OF DELAY: $29.55 Million FACILITY DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION DURATION Identify Need Needs Assessment Advanced Planning Environmental & Design Studies Detail Design ROW, Utilities POTENTIAL I-345 REMOVE Construction Scenario Timeline Estimate - 2017 thru 2040 DRAFT 6/8/16 MASTER ASSESSMENT PROCESS 24 Years* 13 *Includes six-year period to add to Metropolitan Transportation Plan 1│INTRODUCTION 12 T EE HI CK OR YS TR ST RE ET DA W SO N T ST RE E T ST RE E N DA W SO ET SA NT AF EA VE NU E KO RY ST RE HI C T LA NE OA K ER NE LA H AS T EE ST R T EE T AN LO G T EE ST R CE W AY EN M B AR CO CL AV E RO W K ST R The below grade alignment would potentially allow for large portions of the corridor to be capped in the future for parks and other uses. EE T ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/GROWTH EV AR KE ED The scenario identifies a wide bridge between Canton Street and Commerce Street. This bridge would also include Good Latimer and DART D2 crossings. This bridge would allow for a possible deck park opportunity. PS TA NU E NU LL YA VE T EE Deep Ellum to downtown. LI AT L E AV E ON DS AR CH RI T AN TR ES Congestion delay on the freeway system in the downtown area would increase slightly, but would increase by 10% to 18% on thoroughfares. D ST R AR ST R H NT RI CO GE H UT JR NG KI ST M EE R ST AL AR TIN LI PS LU T CO HE R M B W AY D BL VD BO W OO UL Encourages more dense mixed use on east side of downtown; Maintains more direct access for job commute trips from the 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 but in turn, requires a careful look at zoning and preservation Southern Dallas to jobs along US 75 and I-35E north of the 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 175 intensification pressures on CBD. policy from likely development Deep Ellum. SO T EE ES TR EE AL T EE LE ST R EE CK M E CL KE MC ST R PA R EE TS TR ON AU M CK OR YS TR T EE T EE ST R NO GA HI BE E IV DR IV AN LL EE T EE ST R NO GA T K CBD -FAIR -F PARAIR PA K LI RK LI NK N CBD SU T EV AR D T PY EE BO T EX ST R T EE The city street grid would bridge over the below grade I-345. The scenario would provide complete street bridges linking NU Y VA ER T UN ST R ER IEW BS TA RE ST NC 刀愀洀瀀 刀愀洀瀀 X N TIM LA AV E E AR 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 䰀愀渀攀猀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 ST R UL ST R M O CO OD EV AN GO LL K S 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 E ET S T YR TL AT L E BE NU T M E AV K LM N EE PA R ES EE LI EE T EE R ST T AY ST R ISO RR ST ER AL CO The reduction in direct freeway access to the CBD would shift some traffic to longer thoroughfare routes, but only at a minor change in thoroughfare level of service. T The scenario would allow for improved pedestrian and bicycle connections by reducing the number of ramps entering or exiting the street grid from a below grade I-345 highway. E EE N TO UE NG EN HI AV N AS W TO N NG I H S AS ENRW V RI M M Between the I-30 and Woodall Rodgers Interchanges, I-345 would have five lanes in each direction. Through both interchanges, two or three lane direct connectors would reduce the thru-lane count to three in each direction. LIVABILITY/QUALITY OF LIFE FF S D AV ST R At Ross Avenue a partial diamond interchange, with a frontage road U-turn lane would connect Ross Avenue/I-345 to and from the south EE JE HA NU E U EN S The scenario would create an express connection between I-30 and US 75 in a depressed alignment. This facility would have a much smaller footprint and would not be as visually intrusive as today’s elevated structure. R VA T AV E EY E ST LO U R ST NU IS A AN IC RS T EE S RI R FE M EA VE ST RE ET T EE ST R T EE CO HI SA ET ST R Z DI CA T NT AF GO N G OO OD D LA LA TI TI M M ER ER EX EX PY PY N ST RE NT ON HA LL T N ST RE E OA K CA T EE TR YS OR CK R ST T T EE R ST PY ST R D EE ST R EE AV LE ZS TR UT U EN OU EE DI JA CK N PE PE AR AR L L ST ST RE RE ET ET HA N H AR RW OO WO OD D ST ST RE RE ET ET OL OL IV IV E E ST ST R R EE LI EE VE T T N T ST RE E BR YA N T ST RE E D RW OO HA S S HA RW R OO WO OD D ST ST RE RE ET ET ES TN ZB K T O WO AR UC T CH ST EX PA R EE SH T LL T E AV ST R CH PA UL AR UC T E RE ER ES ST T VA RD VIA D T T R ST TIM LA SC T E RE EXISTING CROSS-SECTION CA OD GO S EE IAD ST R Between Pacific and US 75 flanking service roads would be added as the extension of Cesar Chavez Boulevard. S T EE R ST R ST TV T EE LL E E E NU R ST ET RE ST K OA ET RE ST K OA HA ENU U EN AV E AV A HA E T HA T 1S D 2N UT EE ISE D ST RE E N UE EN AV ES TN U LO AR US TO N K UN TR EET ST R EE CH N R ST N AV North from I-30, I-345 would connect to US 75 at its current location in the Woodall Rodgers Interchange. A full-directional interchange would be provided with Woodall Rodgers. T T AK DE SCENARIO DETAILS RS TU DY ) SR OU LE HO S UE UE EN EN AV AV AS OM TH AY STR AS OM TH T OR FL T EE R ST DE T M ST R MURR E STRE LTON S WA BA YL OR 75 O WS DA ST R T SITIO CAN HA N T BR OW T AU ST IN RD LEVA X BOU A PY EX N FI IF GR W PO T N UE UE EN EN AV AV S T EE T ST R LCOLM N MA OR FL S ER T MER CE S TREE EXPO EE S RO ST R COM T LL EE S KW AY ( S RO HA REE T PA R TIM LA T S ER VAY ST EE TY EE MOBILITY/CONGESTION RELIEF The alignment would have a full-directional interchange with I-30, keeping I-30 at its current below grade location. I-345/I-45 mainlanes would be shifted from the top level to directly above I-30 and the direct connecting ramps would be above the I-345/I-45 mainlanes. EE EE LL E R EE 刀愀洀瀀 刀愀洀瀀 ST R CO T E STRE TREE TON S EET EET EET R ST RE ST TR LS INI 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䰀愀渀攀猀 US STR OWD N CR Y STR HENR NT O EE ST R O JA CI RCE MME I-45 would descend south of Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard with the reconstructed facility going under S.M. Wright Boulevard 75 which would be aligned to Cesar Chavez Boulevard. R STR TAYLO T EE AL W 刀愀洀瀀 刀愀洀瀀 TR Y Y FW FW RS RS GE GE OD OD LR LR OD GO HA L DA L DA S O WO S ST R D ET W AN TT HA S R VA IN T EE TON ST S WAL EE BLVD E UL D EVAR X BOUL REET AR A CL ET RE ST EE EE ERFR ONT BR YA N AN UE EN AV COLM S MAL D EVAR X BOUL IFF LA RK R ST HI GR S ET RE SSAT OR N JAC YL IN TA S T T EE K AR CL EE ET ST R N T LETREE S MAINAL EE D RE TON ST S WAL ST R BO LL BR YA N ST R ST R RW OO UE UE EN EN AV AV HA UE UE EN EN AV AV ON ON ST ST GA LL GA S HA T EE TR YS OR CK ET S REET REET ELM STELM ST STREET REET MAIN MAIN ST T R ST R ST ST COLM S MAL EE OA K S R T RD ET STRE STREET TAYLORTAYLOR EVA HO TE ET STRE STRE MERCE MERCE COM COM ET OUL NT B REETSTREET ON ST CANT CANTON FRO STR E DE OA K IS E E EE T IVER FIN SW NU NU R ST TIM LA GRIF S RIV VE S S E AV BR OW T EE N LE AL 75 SS RO T EE TR LS LI REET STMARILLA ST RE ET IS S D AR E AV AK ER Y P EX EZ AV CH AR PE VE SW IS ON ST S E TIM LA ON NT AR ES SC N LI T E SLTI RE OA K BO T R ST CA VE ET RE ST EE COM SW GA PY TEXAS U RO T NG YOU PY O WO TH R ST TEXAS T E STRE PAUL D ST WOO UE UE EN EN AV AV S N ST REET 366 TEXAS 366 TREET ELM S EX 366 T EE E STR MERC T S JACK S T M 345 345 ER R ST EE TREET ELM SSTRE TREE ON S GO LS TR ST R 345 ET ET RE RE ST ST ON ON NT NT CA CA D OO T T EE TREET AIN S T X RE T D OO SG SG ST R EE LL LA TIM ET RE ST H UT ET RE RO T S H UT RO S RO BR YA N T TREE VAY S N ER T TREE LD S S FIE UE AVEN ET E STRE TIM LA N ST R N AVE N STO GA EE E U AVEN BIC PACIF RYA T JA CI NT O ET STREE MAR E STRE EX N O OD UE 345 NT JA CI S RO REET REET ELM STELM ST IC PACIF RE ELM ST T STREE MAIN N T T SA SA E RE ST EE T EE PY VE E UE ENU IC AV IC AVEN PACIF PACIF ST R ST R EE N LA RKET ER OA K R ST S MA DR REET L OTE N ST CY H USTO GEN S HO T RE NR OD VE OA K I OL VE STREET REET MAIN MAIN ST ET STRE STREET MERCE ERCE COM COMM MAIN ON NT REET ST UNG N UL O ZB VE HA D AR EV C AR WO HYAT LVD ION B REUN AV CH AR ES YO OU B EZ SC Parks and Open Spaces LI ET D STRE ARCE EVR OMMLE C ES DART Station T EE TR LS P SC Streetcar T EE R EA N T TREE OD S Potential Parks E R ST RL A PE N CA Railway T TREE LM S IFF ET STRE ILLA MAR Future Dallas-Fort Worth Core Express Service HSR (DFWCES) Trinity Railway Express UE AVEN IC PACIF T T STREE STREE LA ILLA MAR MARIL Future Dallas-Houston High-Speed Rail (HSR) T LI N GR ET Future DART LRT (D2) Analysis Boundary T REE UL ST ST PA N ET STRE ERCE REET IN ST A S REET ST PAUL N ST M COM D R KA T EE R ST EET STR VAY N ER S IS SW EE ET ET G STRE STRE YOUN YOUNG T EE R ST D AR AK S ST R EET STR VAY N ER T EE LL BO GO ET ET RE RE ST ST D TEXAS E NU E AV E AT ST RW OO 366 MAP LEGEND MAP LEGEND MAP LEGEND I-345/I-45 I-30 Potential Development Improved Streets, Frontage Potential Development Planned Development CA NT Roads, and Cross Streets ON Planned Development ST CA (LRT) DART Light Rail Transit RE NT ET Express Lanes ON ST DART Light Rail Transit (LRT) Future Ramps DART LRT (D2) REET On/Off CA Future DART LRT (D2)DIZ DART Station ST Direct Connector Ramps RE CA ET DI DART Station Z ST Potential Development RE C Parks and Open OSpaces ET RS IC AN Parks and OpenCSpaces A Planned PotentialDevelopment Parks ORSIC STRE ET AN A DART Transit ST (LRT) FocusLight AreaRail Boundary RE HA E AT ST N JA CK EV EV AN AN S S ST ST RE RE ET ET DALLAS CITYMAP I-345/I-45 BELOW GRADE SCENARIO AT-A-GLANCE NB IVE RO N JEF FE R SO TB 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 SCENARIO LIMITS: From Hall Street to Lenway Street RF OU LE VA R SCENARIO LENGTH: 3.2 miles +/- D SCENARIO CROSS-SECTION 刀愀洀瀀 ⼀ 䄀甀砀椀氀氀愀爀礀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 刀愀洀瀀 ⼀ 䄀甀砀椀氀氀愀爀礀 刀愀洀瀀 ⼀ 䄀甀砀椀氀氀愀爀礀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 ⼀ 䄀甀砀椀氀氀愀爀礀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䰀愀渀攀猀倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 䰀愀渀攀猀倀甀爀瀀漀猀攀 刀愀洀瀀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䰀愀渀攀猀 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 䄀爀琀攀爀椀愀氀 ⼀ 䰀漀挀愀氀 刀漀愀搀 SCENARIO FACILITY CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE Under $100M M = Million $100M - 499M $500M - 999M $1B - 2B Over $2B B = Billion MOST CONGESTED ROADWAYS IN TEXAS RANK: 23 ANNUAL HOURS OF DELAY PER MILE: 354,695 FACILITY DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION DURATION Identify Need Needs Assessment Advanced Planning Environmental & Design Studies ANNUAL COST OF DELAY: $29.55 Million Detail Design ROW, Utilities Scenario Timeline Estimate - 2017 thru 2040 DRAFT 6/8/16 13 POTENTIAL I-345 BELOW GRADE Construction 24 Years* *Includes six-year period to add to Metropolitan Transportation Plan 14 1│INTRODUCTION MASTER ASSESSMENT PROCESS WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPROVE mobility LIVABILITY I-35E LOWEST STEMMONS IMPROVED CONNECTIONS • For analysis areas depicted in the color coded areas on the adjacent map using I-345 Modify Scenario and High-Speed Rail at I-30 Canyon $3.1 BILLION NET NEW PROPERTY VALUE $105 MILLION 7 I-35E at Reunion Boulevard 3 I-35E at Hi Line Drive 8 Klyde Warren Expansion 272,500 │ 36% │ If we continue to grow but don't improve system COST RANGE $ $ < $100M M │$100-499M R │$500-999M B POPULATION GROWTH 6,000 M │12,000 R │4,400 B EMPLOYMENT GROWTH 23,000 M │40,000 R │29,000 B 200 189,200 │ 33% │ 169,000 │ 31% │ 166,000 │ 31% │ 164,700 │ 33% │ 163,800 │ 40% │ 163,100 │ 32% │ 161,300 │ 30% │ 100 2017 │ 26% 2040 I-345 ANALYSIS AREA: 513 ACRES J 3 System(*) with I-30 Relocate Scenario (Model uses existing I-345) 4 System(*) with I-30 (4-2R-4) Scenario 8 (Model uses existing I-345) System(*) with I-30 (5-2R-5) Scenario I-30 EAST CORRIDOR ANALYSIS AREA: 174 ACRES (Model uses existing I-345) System(*) with I-345 Modify Scenario 5 (Model uses I-30 5-2-2-5) System(*) with I-345 Remove Scenario (Model uses I-30 5-2-2-5) System(*) with I-345 Below Grade Scenario (Model uses I-30 5-2-2-5) 6 2040 Preliminary Plan (NCTCOG plan with Southern Gateway, Lowest Stemmons, I-30 (5-2-2-5), Existing I-345, Trinity Parkway Alternative 3C) I-30 EAST CORRIDOR 7 NET NEW PROPERTY VALUE │ Today’s Daily Congestion Delay $590M * System for each scenario assumes the following projects or operational improvements are constructed: Southern Gateway, Lowest Stemmons, and Trinity Parkway 4 Lane 45MPH concept. YEARS Congestion delay analysis is for freeway/toll road and thouroughfare system within transportation analysis study area. TR NET NEW PROPERTY VALUE $167M POPULATION GROWTH 1,700 NET NEW REVENUE TO CITY $6M COST RANGE $ $ $100-499M IN ITY PA RK WA Y( UN DE RS TU DY ) I-30 CANYON ANALYSIS AREA with high-speed rail: 229 ACRES I-30 CANYON EMPLOYMENT GROWTH NET NEW PROPERTY VALUE 1,000 $969M-$1.1B NET NEW ROADWAY CAPACITY 25% INCREASE NET NEW REVENUE TO CITY $32M-$35M I-35E SOUTHERN GATEWAY ANALYSIS AREA: 149 ACRES DRAFT 6/8/16 $1.4B M │$2.5B R │$1.5B B NET NEW REVENUE TO CITY 1 2 I-35E SOUTHERN GATEWAY NEW JOBS NET NEW PROPERTY VALUE COST RANGE $ $ $100-499M NEW RESIDENTS 51,000 Modify, RRemove, BBelow Grade $51M M │$80M R │$50M B TOTAL HOURS CITY THOUROUGHFARE DELAY % OF DELAY 300 95,100 25,000 2 Proposed Circuit Trail Connector Project 5 I-35E at Continental Avenue NET NEW REVENUE TO CITY AGGREGATED OVER 30 YEARS 6 I-35E at Commerce Street M WEEKDAY TOTAL HOURS OF CONGESTION DELAY Hours (Thousands) ECONOMIC ANALYSIS I-345 1 I-35E at Oak Lawn Avenue 4 I-35E at DART Victory Station economic development For additional data and analysis refer to the complete CityMAP Report. Connectivity analysis only. Refer to adjacent map for keyed improved connection locations. 15 NET NEW REVENUE TO CITY $19M COST RANGE $ $ $500-999M POPULATION GROWTH 6,200-12,200 EMPLOYMENT GROWTH 10,700-20,300 COST RANGE $ $ $500-999M POPULATION GROWTH 5,000 EMPLOYMENT GROWTH 8,300