Contracts and Agreements - her?; 3&1. DATE: #5 DUE REM-IT PAYMENT In rats AD DRESS PLEASE-INCWDEBILL Numseazmvwagcascx Sis/2013 2- AW Room 302- 4/8l201'We?? ?Bier to Appendix Biff-tith Access Offerings- meme: ugdiweg Am?, OF WEST VIRGINIA wee-army ATTN: Jus?n Metallister DESIGN 150- hex-5am: 3530.5 EEWL I Billingioesc?p?om- I a I i #rdi?ec?t Funding mg; BZUEKHANNON U-PSH-USR MID SCH-L Broiect 11953170 19,3851?" 1 291-3- 2311521692" 5 -. :5 5,301,354 is . .5 'Varia?w 55.2.88 {5,8322% 1,921.25 12,392.06.) 33:22.19- 7,355 ?43- . 5,378.03 Brig (lag Eistim. ate M'?t'Eriais- Engineering Placing 591%ng Comma-eta: mm. 2,153.81 51.3-12.2? 3:336:28 2,362.96 286.714 . 4,609.53 Additiana! "cost'_duesto cpstomer. premise facility build work: 4,349,520 ling-225,39 Due talkie acumen .?Materia?l costs-ova ran because. Wad-??at i?dude? In the ??timat?. {aborwst?or p'latir'ig and splicingate not .broken?uzs?parately in the .aiscounting System and are-comb?ined-in the acgual-cess?pnder-the-actuals f6; placing. the ?ber 19 seii'to'tha and User: CahMOf-chaiges We? "ran due-1:021:53 being eredgby 't?adi?gs .w?'rernd't: mum: as?a- sanitat? in. agmai cast are based on work .doae and-rnatgriaiszused. Loading: are :a??dated shah a?s-vehiti?s, auteur-stingaammismion, etc, huiidout'mrk was mi ?st-Came- EEG was hat-discovered until way, Chagge for dag: mayda- 263631135, fe?of ?i hereby certify that the Items ?sted hereon have been received and approve? f0 'payment." $5111 ?onh Per? Lomm nation 5 I L. REMJT PAYMENT TO THIS ADDRESS BILL DATE: 3/14/2013 0 PLEASE . I BILL 9041197244MN Contracts and Agreements AMOUNT: $69,769.48 1500 MacCorkle Ave. DUE DATE: 4/15/2013 Room 020 ?Charleston, WV, 25396 (Please refer to MPLSO7, Appendix D, Alternative Access Offerings Pricing for internet Dedicated Access] STATE OF WEST OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY ATTN: Justin McCallister INFRASTRUCTURE OPERATIONS PO BOX 50110 CHARLESTON, WV, 25305 '1 AMOUNT . Billing Description: . . . - .. $30,889.08 .. reject Billing for BTOP Funding CAR EUCKHANNON UPSHUR HIGH SCH 8: TR 3 ST POI. I ADDITIONAL COST DUE TO CUSTOMER PREMISE FACILITY BUILD OUT WORK: - Facility build cut work was not included in original estimate because need for 5V0. 1" F80 was not discovered until was underway. Charge for FBO does not include loadings, but does include a fixed fee of $1,340.20 for invoice processing. Project 53?: 1:972:14 LCR l: BB49A17 BS49A02 hereby certify that the Items listed hereon have been received and approved 3? ayment." tiff-011717130 REMIT PAYMENT TO THIS ADDRESS BILL DATE: 5/20/2013 omrnunications Solutions PLEASE INCLUDE BILL BILL 9041200244MN Contracts and Agreements NUMBER ON YOUR CHECK AMOUNT: $160,587.90 1500 MacCorkle Ave . DUE DATE: 6/20/2013 Room 020 Charleston, WV, 25396 BTOP-MPLSO7-BB (Please refer to MPLSOT, Appendix D, Alternative Access Offerings Pricing for Internet Dedicated Access) . STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA . OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY Justin McCalIister z" I $10) INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN OPERATIONS 3,1 PO BOX 50110 Q) l; - CHARLESTON, wv, 25305 - (svf. OF CHARGES 0?15, AMOUNT I Billing Description: $160,587.90 Project Billing for BTOP Funding {k CAI: FRENCH CREEK ELEM SCHOOL 00 0 Project ti: 1200244 BB49A06 ab AMOUNT DUE: $160,537.90 I Original LCR Cost Estimate Actual Project Cost Variance 1) Materials 3 20,322.29 5 22,663.69 5 2,346.40 2) Engineering 3 14,612.39 5 - (14,612.39) 3) Placing 23,120.64 27,547.69, 5 4,427.05 4) Splicing 25,116.60 5 (25,116.60) 5) Contractor 11,965.51 5 65,993.51 54,033.00 6) Loadings - 44,373.01 5 44,373.01 TOTAL 5 95,137.93 160,537.90 65,449.97 Cost Overrun Due to the Following: 1) Material costs were higher because additional fiber and inner duct were needed to complete the work. 2) Engineering costs were below estimate. 3) Labor costs for placing and splicing are not broken out separately in the Company's accounting system and are combined in actual costs under the row for placing. 4) Labor costs were higher because additional time was needed to install the fiber and inner duct. 5) Contractor charges were higher due to prevailing wage changes and charges incurred for hereby certify that the Items listed hereon have been received and approved for ayment" . '9 Z9 Date flagging and right of way clearing. Contractor was used for splicing instead Of using core labor. 6) Loadings were not included as a separate item in the original estimate. Loadings in 4 actual project cost are based on work done and materials used. 60 La) Loadings are allocated indirect costs such as vehicles, accounting, administration, etc. j? Communications Solu?ons REMIT PAYMENT TO THIS ADDRESS BILL DATE: 11/8/2012 PLEASE BILL BILL ii: 9041196368MN Contracts and Agreements NUMBER ON YOUR CHECK AMOUNT: $31,552.14 1500 MacCorkle Ave DUE DATE: 12110/2012 Room 020 Charleston, WV, 25396 . "fistATE or wesr OF TECHNOLOGY ATTN: JOHN SANDORO ?(Please refer to Appendix 0, Alternative Access Offerings Pricing for Internet Dedicated Access) ?1 . INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN OPERATIONS PO BOX 50110 CHARLESTON, WV, 25305 [gum or CHARGES AMOUNT. Billing Description: $31,552.14 Project Billing for BTOP Funding CAI: BUCKHANNON UPSHUR INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL 1 5 Project it: 1196368 3849A03 AMOUNT DUE: $31,552.14 Original LCR Cost Estimate Actual Proiect Cost Variance 1) Materials 5 3,574.60 5 3,647.80 73.20 2) Engineering 5 4,820.29 3 - 5 (4,820.29) 3) Placing 8,225.30 11,244.79 5 . 3,019.49 4) Splicing 5 5,324.84 - 5 (5,324.84) 5) Contractor 4,864.80 5 2,873.99 5 (1,990.81) 6) Loadings - 13,785.56 5 13,785.56 TOTAL 26,809.83 31,552.14 5 4,742.31 Cost Overrun Due to the Following: 1) Materials cost is higher because additional fiber was ordered. 3 2) Engineering costs were lower than estimated because a majority of the engineering was done by an engineering contractor and included in contractor expense. 6) 3) Labor costs for placing and splicing are not broken out separately in the Company's accounting system and are combined in the actual costs under the actuals for placing. 4) Labor costs were lower because time to complete was Overestimated. I 5) Contractor costs were lower because strand and work normally done by contractors was not needed on this job. The fiber cable was lashed to an existing strand. 6) Loadings were not included as a separate item in the original estimate. Loadings in - actual proiect cost are based On work done and materials used. Loadings are hereby certify that the Items listed allocated indirect costs such as vehicles, accounting, administration, etc. hereon have been received and pproved cha?mDnt." I2 IL ?y Name amazes ?mer? ommunica?ons Solutions PAYMENT TO THIS ADDRESS BILL DATE: 10/11/2012 . PLEASE INCLUDE BILL BILL ii: 9041196369MN Contracts and Agreements NUMBER ON YOUR CHECK AMOUNT: 9,629.28 1500 MacCorkle Ave DUE DATE: 11/12/2012 Room 020 Charlestoo, WV, 25396 BTOP-M PL507-88 I (Please refer to Appendix D, Alternative Access Offerings Pricing for Internet Dedicated Access) STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY ATTN: Justin McCallister INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN PO BOX 50110 CHARLESTON, WV, 25305 OPERATIONS gol?ng? . cnneecs \?Qig my AMOUNT Billing Description: 1w 3 5,489.08/ Project Billing for BTOP Funding - ?1?0 CAI: FRE 0' WBERLE TECH NICAL CENTER Win??ggion Project 8: 1195359 8849Aos ?0 Original LCR Cost Estimate Actual Proiect Cost ,Variance 719.60 5' 633.56" 2) Engineering 5 504.00 - 5 (504.00) 3) Placing 605.00 5 1,481.97 5 876.9? 4) Splicing 317.00 - {317.00} 5) Contractor 540.00 3 1,621.02 5 1,081.02 6) Loadings - 1,752.53 5 1,752.53 TOTAL 5 2,685.60 5 5,489.08 5 2,803.48 7) Additional costdue to customer premise facility build out work: . 5 4,140.20 AMOUNT DUE: 9,629.28] Cost Overrun Due to the Following: Material costs were below original estimate. Engineering costs did not-exceed estimated amount. Labo?r?costs for placing and splicing arena: broken out separately in the Company?s accounting system and are combined in the actual costs under the actuals for placing. Labor costs were were higher because the project took longer than expected to complete. Contractor charges were because contract labor was used for engineering. On the original estimate, Frontier was to do the engineering. Loadings were not included as a separate item in the original estimate. Loadings in actual project cost are based on work done and materials used. Loadings are allocated indirect costs suchas vehicles, accounting, administration, etc. Facility build out work was not included in original estimate because need for FBO was not discovered until project was under way. Charge for FBO does not include loadings, but does include a ?xed fee of $1,340.20for invoice processing. @53qu hereby certify that the items listed hereon have been received and approved in pay ent." tar . . 3. REMIT PAYMENT TO THIS ADDRESS BILL DATE: 9/26/2013 Communications Solutions PLEASE INCLUDE BILL BILL ti: 9041198471?le Contracts and Agreements NUMBER ON YOUR CHECK AMOUNT: 133,084.69 1500 MacCorkle Ave DUE DATE: 10/28/2013 Room 020 Charleston, WV, 25396 BTOP-MPLSO7-BB (Please refer to Appendix D, Alternative Access Offerings Pricing for Internet Dedicated Access) STATE OFWESTVIRGINIA OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY AWN: Justin McCallister 3 0 INFRASTRUCTURE 8: DESIGN OPERATIONS i. PO BOX 50110 J, .x CHARLESTON, wv, 25305 . ??33 :71" 0F CHARGES Q?s? AMOUNT gig/l Billing Description: 115,844.49 Project Billing for BTOP Funding CAI: HODGESVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I Project ti: 1198474 I BB49A07 Original LCR Cost Estimate Actual Project Cost Variance 1) Materials 8,772.72 8,453.08 2) Engineering 11,151.80 130.57 (1102123)?? 3) Placing 10,791.15 5 9,724.07 9 4) Splicing 5 7,583.91 - 5) Contractor 5,275.54 80,098.84 74,823.30 6) Loadings - 17,437.93 17,437.93 3 TOTAL 5 43,575.12 115,844.49 72,269.37 7) Additional cost due to customer premise facility build out work: 17,240.20 l/Co AMOUNT DUE: 133,034.69] Cost Overrun Due to the Following: 1) Material costs were lower than estimate. 2) Engineering costs did not exceed estimated amount. f'l hereby certify that the items ?3th 3) Labor costs for placing and splicing are not broken out separately in the Company?s hereon haVe been ?309le and accounting system and are combined in the actual costs under the actuals for placing. H3 4) Labor costs did not exceed estimate, 5) Contractor charges were higher because the following components were unforeseen at the Date Name time the LCR was written: Contractor charges were paid at the prevailing wage rate, flaggers were used during the project, the power company performed transfers, some engineering and splicing work were done by the engineering contractor instead of core labor. 6) Loadings were not included as a separate item in the original estimate. Loadings in actual project cost are based on work done and materials used. Loadings are allocated indirect costs such as vehicles, accounting, administration, etc. 7) Facility build out work (EEG) was not included in original estimate because need for a FBO was not discovered until project was under way. Charge for FBO does not include loadings, but does include 3 leEd fee (if $1,340.20 for anOlCE processing. far?men t. Communications Solutions REMIT PAYMENT TO THIS ADDRESS BILL DATE: 4/15/2013 PLEASE INCLUDE BILL BILL 9041211218 Contracts and Agreements NUMBER ON YOUR CHECK AMOUNT: $269,814.14 1500 MacCorkle Ave DUE DATE: 5/15/2013 Room 020 Charleston, WV, 25396 BTOP-MPLSO7-BB (Please refer to MPLSOT, Appendix D, Alternative Access Offerings Pricing for Internet Dedicated Access) STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY Justin McCaliister INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN OPERATIONS PO BOX 50110 CHARLESTON, WV, 25305 OF CHARGES AMOUNT Billing Description: $259,814.14 Project Billing for BTOP Funding CA1: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Project 1211218 BB49A11 AMOUNT DUE: $269,814:14 4 Original LCR Cost Estimate Actual Proiect Cost Variance Materials 5 44,894.60 5 40,438.04 5 (4,456.56) Engineering 5 43,730.60 426.27 (43,304.33) Placing 40,551.02 5 9,483.34 5 (31,067.68) Splicing 38,590.22 5 (38,590.22) Contractor 98,284.96 5 205,397.40 107,112.44 Loadings - 5 14,069.09 14,069.09 TOTAL 266,051.40 - 269,814.14 3,762.74 Cost Overrun Due to the Following: Material costs did not exceed estimated amount. Engineering costs did not exceed estimate. Labor costs for placing and splicing are not broken out separately in the Company's accounting system and are combined in actual costs under the row for placing. Labor costs did not exceed estimated amount. Contractor charges were higher because contractors were used to do all of the placing work and most of the splicing. hereby certify that the Items listed hereon have been received and roved for ayment." Date Loadings were not included as a separate item in the original estimate. Loadings in actual project cost are based on work done and materials used. Loadings are allocated indirect costs such as vehicles, accounting, administration, etc. .1, with er . . . REMIT PAYMENT TO THIS ADDRESS BILL DATE: 9/26/2013 commun'camns 50mm? PLEASE INCLUDE BILL BILL II: 9041197261MN Contracts and Agreements NUMBER ON YOUR CHECK AMOUNT: 119,541.78 1500 MacCorkIe Ave DUE DATE: 10/28/2013 Room 020 Charleston, WV, 25396 BTOP-MPLSO7-BB (Please refer to MPLSO7, Appendix D, Alternative Access Offerings Pricing lnternEt Dedicated Access) STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY ATTN:Justin McCallister SEP 3 2'3: INFRASTRUCTURE 8: DESIGN OPERATIONS PO BOX 50110 By 46/ CHARLESTON, wv, 25305 6 or CHARGES AMOUNT Billing Description: 5 114,251.58 Project Billing for BTOP Funding CAI: ROCK CAVE ELEMENTARY Project 1197261 BB49A08 Original LCR Cost Estimate Actual Project Cost Variance Materials 7,822.36 7,877.94 55.58 Engineering 3 8,120.99 5 1,567.28 5 (6,553.71) Placing 12,807.17 7,376.39 Splicing 5 6,001.94 5 - 5 Contractor 5,081.56 77,842.95 72,761.39 Loadings - 19,587.02 TOTAL 39,834.02 114,251.58/ 74,417.56/ Additional cost due to customer premise facility '1 ?in-j; 3 5,290.20/ AMOUNT DUE: OCT 2 8 2n Cost Overrun Due to the Following: l? Jj Material costs were higher due to higher cost (?wgen purchased. I Engineering costs did not exceed estimated amount. Labor costs for placing and splicing are not broken out separately in the Company's accounting system and are combined in the actual costs under the actuals for placing. Labor costs did not exceed estimate. Contractor Charges were higher because the following components were unforeseen at the time the LCR was written: Contractor charges were paid at the prevailing wage rate, flaggers were used during the project, engineering, splicing and placing work was done by the engineering contractor and contracted workers instead of core labor. Loadings were not included as a separate item in the original estimate. Loadings in actual project cost are based on work done and materials used. Loadings are allocated indirect costs such as vehicles, accounting, administration, etc. Facility build out work (EEG) was not included in original estimate because need for FBO was not discovered until project was under way. Charge for FBO does not include loadings, but does include a ?xed fee of $1,340.20 for invoice processing. 15 119,541.78 "i hereby certify that the Items listed hereon have been received and approved for paymen Date ?onh en . . . . REMIT PAYMENT TO THIS ADDRESS DATE: 4/16/2013 COmmunlcatlons Solutions PLEASE INCLUDE BILL BILL it: 9041200234MN Contracts and Agreements NUMBER ON YOUR CHECK AMOUNT: 55,775.45 1500 MacCorkle Ave Room 302 DUE DATE: 5/16/2013 Charleston, WV, 25396 BTOP-MPLSO7-BB (Please refer to MPLSO7, Appendix D, Alternative Access Offerings Pricing for Internet Dedicated Access) STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY Justin McCallister INFRASTRUCTURE 81 DESIGN OPERATIONS PO BOX 50110 CHARLESTON, WV, 25305 39:1 WETAIL 0F CHARGES AMOUNT Billing Description: 32,135.25 Project Billing for BTOP Funding CAI: UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL \0 Project 1200234 ?3470 BB49A10 ?9 Original LCR Cost Estimate Actual Project Cost Variance 1) Materials 5 4,372.05 3,523.91 5 (343.14) 2) Engineering 5 4,567.61 - 5 (4,567.61) 3) Placing 5 4,321.73 5 4,950.70 5 628.97 4) Splicing 5 3,573.39 5 - 5 (3,573.39) 5) Contractor 5 5,579.25 5 15,508.04 9,928.79 6) Loadings - 5 8,152.60 5 8,152.60 TOTAL 22,419.03 32,135.25 5 9,716.22 7) Additional cost due to customer premise facility build out work: 5 23,640.20 AMOUNT DUE: 55,775.45 Cost Overrun Due to the Following: 1) Material costs were below estimate 2) Engineering costs were below estimate. 3) Labor costs for placing and splicing are not broken out separately in the Company's accounting system and are combined in the actual costs under the actuals for placing. 4) Labor charges were below estimate. 5) Contractor charges were higher due to contractor being used instead of internal labor hereby certify that the Items listed for splicing. Contractors were also paid at prevailing wage. hereon have been received and 6) Loadings were not included as a separate item in the original estimate. Loadings in ap rov,ed for a ment'n actual project cost are based on work done and materials used. Loadings are 2 allocated indirect costs such as vehicles, accounting, administration, etc. ate 7) Facility build out work (FBO) was not included in original estimate because need for FBO was not discovered until project was under way. Charge for FBO does not include loadings, but does include a fixed fee of $1,340.20 for invoice processing. ame 501 r41 qw 9A onit er" Communications Solutions .- . REMIT PAYMENTTO ADDRESS BILL DATE: 11/8/2012 PLEASE INCLUDE BILL ti: 9041195978MN Contracts and Agreements NUMBER ON YOUR CHECK AMOUNT: 47,132,366 1500 MacCorkle Ave Room 302 DUE DATE: Charleston, wv, 25396 . (Please refer to Appendix 0, Alternative Access Offerings Pricing for internet Dedicated Access) STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY SANDORO INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN OPERATIONS PO BOX 50110 CHARLESTON, WV, 25305 I . . .. we. or CHARGES ?my/7 0mg AMOUNT. 7 Billing Description: 1 26,593.06 Project Billing for BTOP Funding I CAI: TENNERTON ELEM PSHUR CO PUBLIC LIBRARY 0631. ogim?g SEC - Project a 1195978 AOCO 8549A39 38:19:13 Orieinal LCR Cost Estimate Actual Proiect Cost Variance 1} Materials 5 3,1371% 3 3,541 75 5 76.75 2) Engineering 4,139 55 - (4,133.55) 3} Placing 3 5,701.84 5 9,132.63 3,431.79, ETS?licIng 5' 3330235?" "(aggressi? ?1,109.73 5 3,329.55 5 {1,939.15} a} Lac-dings .3 - 3 10,733.13 3 10,792.13 TOTE-.1 1035? 25,533.06 3 5,741.59 H0 UHO 70 7} Additional cost due to customer premise facility build- out work: 5 2Q68?5?a? muHO - 7?0 AMOUNT our: 3 Cost Overrun Due to the Following: L13 l) aterials cost is higher due to inconsistencies in fiber prices. 2} Engineering costs were zero because the engineering work was done by a contractor and oinesurace: contractor 1:32.: 3) Labor costs for placing and splicing are not broken out separately in the Company's PA 4/ 4) Placing and splicing labor were higher than the LCR estimate due to inconsistencies in the formula used Lilli accounting system and are combined in the actual costs under the actuals for placing. . for the original estimate, and due to an increase in the Labor rate after the project was released to Construction. 5) Contractor charges were lower because two jobs were combined into one. 6) Loadings were not included as a separate item in the original estimate. Loadings in actual project cost are based on work done and materials used. Loadings are hereby certify that the items ?beef allocated indirect costs such as vehicles, accounting, administration, etc. hereon have Been received and 7) Loadings were not included as a separate item in the original estimate. Loadings in TOP 943me actual project cost are based on work done and materials used. Loadings are allocated indirect costs such as vehicles, accounting, administration, etc. at?