IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
COMMON CAUSE; the NORTH CAROLINA
DEMOCRATIC PARTY; LARRY D. HALL;
DOUGLAS BERGER; CHERYL LEE TAFT;
RICHARD TAFT; ALICE L. BORDSEN;
WILLIAM H. FREEMAN; MELZER A.
MORGAN, JR.; CYNTHIA S. BOYLAN; COY E.
BREWER, JR.; JOHN MORRISON MCNEILL;
ROBERT WARREN WOLF; JONES P. BYRD;
JOHN W. GRESHAM; RUSSELL G. WALKER,
JR.,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 1:16-CV-1026
THREE-JUDGE COURT

PLAINTIFFS,
v.
ROBERT A. RUCHO, in his official capacity as
Chairman of the North Carolina Senate
Redistricting Committee for the 2016 Extra
Session and Co-Chairman of the Joint Select
Committee on Congressional Redistricting;
DAVID R. LEWIS, in his official capacity as
Chairman of the North Carolina House of
Representatives Redistricting Committee for
the 2016 Extra Session and Co-Chairman of
the Joint Select Committee on Congressional
Redistricting;
PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as
the President Pro Tempore of the North
Carolina Senate;
TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity
as the Speaker of the North Carolina House
of Representatives;
A. GRANT WHITNEY, JR., in his official
capacity as Chairman and acting on behalf of
the North Carolina State Board of Elections;

1461282.1

Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 28

 PATRICK L. MCCRORY, in his official
capacity as Governor of the State of North
Carolina;
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF
ELECTIONS; and
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
DEFENDANTS.
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
INTRODUCTION
1.

This is an action to declare the North Carolina 2016 Congressional

Redistricting Plan (N.C. Sess. Law 2016-1) (“the 2016 Plan”) as a whole, and each of the
thirteen congressional districts created by that Plan, to be unconstitutional partisan
gerrymanders that violate the First Amendment (Count I), the Equal Protection Clause of
the Fourteenth Amendment (Count II), and Article I, section 2 of the Constitution of the
United States (Count III), and also to declare that in adopting the 2016 Plan the
legislature exceeded the authority granted by Article I, section 4 of the U.S. Constitution,
which provides that state legislatures “determine the times, places and manner of
election” of members of the U.S. House of Representatives (Count IV).
THE PARTIES
2.

The plaintiffs are:

(a)

Common Cause, on its own behalf and on behalf of its members who are

citizens of North Carolina and are registered Democratic voters, whose votes in
congressional elections have been diluted or nullified as a result of the unconstitutional

2
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 2 of 28

 gerrymander by the 2016 Plan of North Carolina’s thirteen congressional districts.
Common Cause is a non-profit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
District of Columbia. It is a nonpartisan democracy organization with over 450,000
members and local organizations in 35 states, including North Carolina. Since its
founding by John Gardner in 1970, Common Cause has been dedicated to fair elections
and making government at all levels more representative, open and responsive to the
interests of ordinary people. “For the past twenty-five years, Common Cause has been
one of the leading proponents of redistricting reform.” Jonathan Winburn, The Realities
of Redistricting p. 205 (2008).
(b)

Gerrymandering is not a partisan issue that favors one party or another.

Gerrymanders have been used by both Democrats and Republicans to entrench their
power almost since the founding of this Nation. Whether done by Democrats or
Republicans, partisan gerrymanders are antithetical to our democracy. Common Cause is
at the forefront of efforts to combat gerrymandering, no matter what party is responsible,
in the belief that when election districts are created in a fair and neutral way, the People
will be able to elect representatives who truly represent them. To that end, Common
Cause has organized and led the coalitions that secured passage of ballot initiatives that
created independent redistricting commissions in Arizona and California and campaigned
for ratification of an amendment to the Florida Constitution prohibiting partisan
gerrymandering. Common Cause is the sponsor of the annual Gerrymander Standards
Writing Competition. In this case, Common Cause is opposing a Republican

3
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 3 of 28

 gerrymander in North Carolina, but at the same time Common Cause is opposing a
Democratic gerrymander in Maryland, where it has appeared as amicus curiae in the
Supreme Court in Shapiro v. McManus, ___ U.S. ___, 136 S. Ct. 450 (2015), and in the
district court on remand, 1:13-cv-03233-JKB (D. Md.). For Common Cause, these are
issues of principle, not of party, and it is committed to eliminating the harm caused to its
members and all citizens by these practices.
(c)

The North Carolina Democratic Party (“NCDP”) is a political party as

defined in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-96. Its purposes are (i) to bring people together to
develop public policies and positions favorable to NCDP members and the public
generally, (ii) to identify candidates who will support and defend those policies and
positions, and (iii) to persuade voters to cast their ballots for those candidates. These
purposes are essential to the functioning of our democracy. Defendants’ unlawful
partisan gerrymander was adopted to discriminate against the NCDP and its members
because of their beliefs and association and to suppress or nullify the capacity of the
NCDP to achieve its essential purposes for its members.
(d)

Larry D. Hall is a registered Democratic voter residing at 1526 Southwood

Drive in the City of Durham in Durham County, North Carolina. He practices law in
Durham and is a Democratic member of the North Carolina House of Representatives.
Defendants assigned Representative Hall to Congressional District (“CD”) 1 for the 2016
election. Together with all other Democratic voters, Representative Hall has been
harmed by Defendants’ unlawful gerrymandering because it treats him unequally based

4
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 4 of 28

 on his political beliefs and association. His vote for the U.S. House of Representatives
will be diluted or nullified as a result of his placement in CD 1.
(e)

Douglas Berger is a registered Democratic voter residing at 125 Hunters

Lane in the City of Youngsville in Franklin County, North Carolina. He is a lawyer and
former member of the North Carolina Senate. Defendants assigned Mr. Berger to CD 2
for the 2016 election. Together with all other Democratic voters, Mr. Berger has been
harmed by Defendants’ unlawful gerrymandering because it treats him unequally based
on his political beliefs and association. His vote for the U.S. House of Representatives
will be diluted or nullified as a result of his placement in CD 2.
(f)

Dr. and Mrs. Richard and Cheryl Lee Taft are registered Democratic voters

residing at 303 Kenilworth Road in the City of Greenville in Pitt County, North Carolina.
He is a retired physician, and she is a landscape architect. Defendants assigned Dr. and
Mrs. Taft to CD 3 for the 2016 election. Together with all other Democratic voters, Dr.
and Mrs. Taft have been harmed by Defendants’ unlawful gerrymandering because it
treats them unequally based on their political beliefs and association. Their votes for the
U.S. House of Representatives will be diluted or nullified as a result of their placement in
CD 3.
(g)

Alice L. Bordsen is a registered Democratic voter residing at 706

Copperline Drive #202 in the Town of Chapel Hill in Orange County, North Carolina.
She is a lawyer and former Democratic member of the North Carolina House of
Representatives. Defendants assigned Ms. Bordsen to CD 4 for the 2016 election.

5
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 5 of 28

 Together with all other Democratic voters, Ms. Bordsen has been harmed by Defendants’
unlawful gerrymandering because it treats her unequally based on her political beliefs and
association. Her vote for the U.S. House of Representatives will be diluted or nullified as
a result of her placement in CD 4.
(h)

William H. Freeman is a registered Democratic voter residing at 112

Westhaven Circle in the City of Winston-Salem in Forsyth County, North Carolina. He
practices law in Winston-Salem and is a retired Superior Court Judge. Defendants
assigned Judge Freeman to CD 5 for the 2016 election. Together with all other
Democratic voters, Judge Freeman has been harmed by Defendants’ unlawful
gerrymandering because it treats him unequally based on his political beliefs and
association. His vote for the U.S. House of Representatives will be diluted or nullified as
a result of his placement in CD 5.
(i)

Melzer A. Morgan, Jr. is a registered Democratic voter residing at 1607

Courtland Avenue in the City of Reidsville in Rockingham County, North Carolina. He
is a retired Superior Court Judge. Judge Morgan was assigned to CD 6 for the 2016
election. Together with all other Democratic voters, Judge Morgan has been harmed by
Defendants’ unlawful gerrymandering because it treats him unequally based on his
political beliefs and association. His vote for the U.S. House of Representatives will be
diluted or nullified as a result of his placement in CD 6.
(j)

Cynthia S. Boylan is a registered Democratic voter residing at 612 Forest

Hills Drive in the City of Wilmington in New Hanover County, North Carolina. She is a

6
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 6 of 28

 retired member of the North Carolina Department of Justice. Defendants assigned Ms.
Boylan to CD 7 for the 2016 election. Together with all other Democratic voters, Ms.
Boylan has been harmed by Defendants’ unlawful gerrymandering because it treats her
unequally based on her political beliefs and association. Her vote for the U.S. House of
Representatives will be diluted or nullified as a result of her placement in CD 7.
(k)

Coy E. Brewer, Jr. is a registered Democratic voter residing at 909

Calamint Lane in the City of Fayetteville in Cumberland County, North Carolina. He
practices law in Fayetteville and is a retired Superior Court Judge. Judge Brewer was
assigned to CD 8 for the 2016 election. Together with all other Democratic voters, Judge
Brewer has been harmed by Defendants’ unlawful gerrymandering because it treats him
unequally based on his political beliefs and association. His vote for the U.S. House of
Representatives will be diluted or nullified as a result of his placement in CD 8.
(l)

John Morrison McNeill is a registered Democratic voter residing at 225

East 3rd Ave. in the Town of Red Springs in Robeson County, North Carolina. He
currently serves as Mayor of Red Springs. Defendants assigned Mr. McNeill to CD 9 for
the 2016 election. Together with all other Democratic voters, Mr. McNeill has been
harmed by Defendants’ unlawful gerrymandering because it treats him unequally based
on his political beliefs and association. His vote for the U.S. House of Representatives
will be diluted or nullified as a result of his placement in CD 9.
(m)

Robert Warren Wolf is a registered Democratic voter residing at 238

Knollwood Drive in the Town of Forest City in Rutherford County, North Carolina. He

7
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 7 of 28

 practices law in Forest City. Defendants assigned Mr. Wolf to CD 10 for the 2016
election. Together with all other Democratic voters, Mr. Wolf has been harmed by
Defendants’ unlawful gerrymandering because it treats him unequally based on his
political beliefs and association. His vote for the U.S. House of Representatives will be
diluted or nullified as a result of his placement in CD 10.
(n)

Jones P. Byrd is a registered Democratic voter residing at 89 Edgelawn

Drive in the City of Asheville in Buncombe County, North Carolina. He practices law in
Asheville and is former Chair of the Buncombe County Board of Elections. Defendants
assigned Mr. Byrd to CD 11 for the 2016 election. Together with all other Democratic
voters, Mr. Byrd has been harmed by Defendants’ unlawful gerrymandering because it
treats him unequally based on his political beliefs and association. His vote for the U.S.
House of Representatives will be diluted or nullified as a result of his placement in CD
11.
(o)

John W. Gresham is a registered Democratic voter residing at 717 E.

Kingston Ave. in the City of Charlotte in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. He
practices law in Charlotte. Defendants assigned Mr. Gresham to CD 12 for the 2016
election. Together with all other Democratic voters, Mr. Gresham has been harmed by
Defendants’ unlawful gerrymandering because it treats him unequally based on his
political beliefs and association. His vote for the U.S. House of Representatives will be
diluted or nullified as a result of his placement in CD 12.

8
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 8 of 28

 (p)

Russell G. Walker, Jr. is a registered Democratic voter residing at 104

Jordan Ridge Way in the City of Jamestown in Guilford County, North Carolina. He is a
retired Superior Court Judge. Defendants assigned Judge Walker to CD 13 for the 2016
election. Together with all other Democratic voters, Judge Walker has been harmed by
Defendants’ unlawful gerrymandering because it treats him unequally based on his
political beliefs and association. His vote for the U.S. House of Representatives will be
diluted or nullified as a result of his placement in CD 13.
3.

The defendants are:

(a)

Robert A. Rucho, in his official capacity as Chairman of the North Carolina

Senate Redistricting Committee for the 2016 Extra Session and Co-Chairman of the Joint
Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting;
(b)

David R. Lewis, in his official capacity as Chairman of the North Carolina

House of Representatives Redistricting Committee for the 2016 Extra Session and CoChairman of the Joint Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting;
(c)

Philip E. Berger, in his official capacity as the President Pro Tempore of

the North Carolina Senate;
(d)

Timothy K. Moore, in his official capacity as the Speaker of the North

Carolina House of Representatives;
(e)

A. Grant Whitney, Jr., in his official capacity as Chairman and acting on

behalf of the North Carolina State Board of Elections;

9
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 9 of 28

 (f)

Patrick L. McCrory, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of

North Carolina;
(g)

The North Carolina State Board of Elections, which is the agency that is

charged with the responsibility for the administration of the election laws of the State of
North Carolina and with the “general supervision over the primaries and elections in the
State,” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-22(a), including elections of the thirteen members of the
United States House of Representatives from North Carolina;
(h)

The State of North Carolina, a sovereign state of the United States. Its

legislative power is vested in the General Assembly. N.C. Const. Art. II, § 1. That
power is “derived from the people” and must be exercised “solely for the good of the
whole.” Id. Art. 1 § 2. Among the rights granted North Carolinians is the right “to
assemble together … to instruct their representatives” and the right “to apply to the
General Assembly for the redress of grievances.” Id. § 12.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
4.

This case arises under the Constitution of the United States, the issues are

justiciable and well within the established subject-matter jurisdiction of this Court under
28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, 1357, 2201 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and must be heard and
determined by a district court of three judges under 28 U.S.C. § 2284. Venue is
appropriate in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

10
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 10 of 28

 STATEMENT OF FACTS
5.

From 2002 until 2012, North Carolina was represented in Congress by

thirteen representatives elected from districts established under a reapportionment plan
adopted by the North Carolina General Assembly in 2001 (the “2001 Plan”) to conform
to the one-person, one-vote requirements of Article I, § 2 of the U.S. Constitution. See
Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, 84 S. Ct. 526 (1964).
6.

Five congressional general elections were conducted under the 2001 plan,

beginning in 2002 and ending in 2010. The following chart reflects the number and
percent of votes cast in favor of Democratic and Republican candidates for Congress in
those elections, as well as the number and percent of Democratic and Republican
candidates actually elected to Congress under the 2001 plan:
North Carolina State-wide Votes
in U.S. House Elections
Year Number of DEM Number of GOP
Democratic Votes Republican Votes
(“DEM”)
as % (“GOP”)
as %
Votes
of
Votes
of
Total
Total
Votes
Votes

Representatives Elected
to U.S. House for North Carolina
Number
DEM
Number GOP
of DEM Reps.
of
Reps.
Repreas % of GOP
as %
sentatives Total
Reps.
of
(“Reps”) Reps.
Total
Reps.

2002 970,716

45%

1,209,033

54%

6

46%

7

54%

2004 1,669,864

49%

1,743,131

51%

6

46%

7

54%

2006 1,026,915

53%

913,893

47%

7

54%

6

46%

2008 2,293,971

54%

1,901,517

45%

8

62.5%

5

38.5%

2010 1,204,635

45%

1,440,913

54%

7

54%

6

46%

11
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 11 of 28

 7.

In 2011, the Republican party gained control of both houses of the North

Carolina General Assembly and enacted a new congressional redistricting plan (the
“2011 Plan”) that resulted in the election of nine Republicans and four Democrats to
Congress in 2012 and ten Republicans and three Democrats in 2014.
8.

The 2011 Plan dramatically altered the composition of the North Carolina

delegation elected to Congress in the 2012 and 2014 general elections:
North Carolina State-wide Votes
in U.S. House Elections
Year Number of DEM Number of GOP
Democratic Votes Republican Votes
(“DEM”)
as %
(“GOP”)
as %
Votes
of
Votes
of
Total
Total
Votes
Votes

Representatives Elected
to U.S. House for North Carolina
Number
DEM Number GOP
of DEM
Reps. of
Reps.
Repreas %
GOP
as %
sentatives of
Reps.
of
(“Reps”) Total
Total
Reps.
Reps.

2012 2,218,357

51%

2,137,167

49%

4

31%

9

69%

2014 1,361,695

44%

1,596,942

55%

3

23%

10

77%

9.

On February 5, 2016, the 2011 North Carolina Congressional Redistricting

Plan was declared unconstitutional by a three-judge district court in Harris v. McCrory,
No. 1:13-CV-949, 2016 WL 482052 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2016), appeal docketed, No. 151262 (U.S. Apr. 11, 2016). The court held that both the First Congressional District and
the Twelfth Congressional District were the product of unconstitutional racial
gerrymanders that violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
and enjoined the State from conducting the 2016 primary and general elections under the
2011 Plan. Id. at *17, *21.

12
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 12 of 28

 10.

In response to the ruling of the court in Harris, the Republican leadership in

both the North Carolina House and Senate appointed a Joint Select Committee on
Redistricting (the “Joint Committee”) to draft a new congressional redistricting plan. The
Joint Committee was composed of 25 Republicans and 12 Democrats. It was co-chaired
by the same two Republican legislators, Representative David Lewis and Senator Robert
Rucho, who had co-chaired the Joint Committee responsible for drafting the
unconstitutional 2011 Congressional Redistricting Plan.
11.

The Joint Committee met on February 16, 2016, to consider the adoption of

a set of written redistricting criteria that was drafted by the two Republican co-chairs of
the Committee, defendants Representative Lewis and Senator Rucho.
12.

At the Joint Committee hearing, Representative Lewis explained the written

criteria. He said that, “to the extent possible, the map drawers [would be instructed
to] create a map which is perhaps likely to elect ten Republicans and three
Democrats.” February 16, 2016 North Carolina Joint Select Committee on
Congressional Redistricting (2015) Hearing Transcript (“Tr.”), available at
https://redistricting.lls.edu/files/NC%20Harris%2020160217%20Transcript.pdf, at 48
(emphasis added). Representative Lewis freely “acknowledge[d] … that this would be
a political gerrymander,” which, he claimed, “is not against the law.” Id. (emphasis
added).
13.

Representative Lewis went on to “propose that we draw the maps to give

a partisan advantage to ten Republicans and three Democrats because I do not

13
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 13 of 28

 believe it’s possible to draw a map with 11 Republicans and two Democrats.” Tr. 50
(emphasis added).
14.

Representative Lewis emphasized that by adopting the written criteria, “we

[the Joint Committee] want to make clear that we…are going to use political data in
drawing this map. It is to gain partisan advantage on the map. … I want that
criteria to be clearly stated and understood.” Tr. 53-4 (emphasis added).
15.

Representative Lewis said that race would not be considered in drawing the

new congressional district map, and emphasized that the only information other than
population that would be used to draw the lines of the new congressional districts to
maintain the existing 10-3 Republican partisan advantage would be “political data.” Tr.
54. He specifically said that the Joint Committee would use “political data, which was
the earlier criteria adopted by th[e] committee [in 2011]. … [A]s you draw the lines,
if you’re trying to give a partisan advantage, you would draw the lines so that more
of the whole VTDs [Voter Tabulation Districts] voted for the Republican on the
ballot than they did the Democrat.” Tr. 57 (emphasis added).
16.

The Joint Committee voted to adopt the written criteria that Representative

Lewis and Senator Rucho proposed by a strict party-line vote. A true and correct copy of
the 2016 Contingent Congressional Plan Committee Adopted Criteria is attached as
Exhibit A and is incorporated herein by reference (and hereinafter referred to as the
“2016 Adopted Criteria”).

14
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 14 of 28

 17.

The 2016 Adopted Criteria expressly instructed the mapmakers to make a

“reasonable effort” to draw a new North Carolina congressional district map that would
maintain the existing 10-3 Republican “Partisan Advantage”:
Partisan Advantage
The partisan makeup of the congressional delegation under the enacted plan
is 10 Republicans and 3 Democrats. The Committee shall make
reasonable efforts to construct districts in the 2016 Contingent
Congressional Plan to maintain the current partisan makeup of North
Carolina’s congressional delegation.
Exhibit A (emphasis added).
18.

The 2016 Adopted Criteria also gave the mapmakers specific instructions

that, other than population, they should use only “political data” to redraw the lines of
North Carolina’s thirteen congressional districts. The “political data” reflected whether
the people in each Voter Tabulation District had voted in favor of Democratic or
Republican candidates for certain state-wide elections since 2008 (excluding, however,
the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections):
Political Data
The only data other than population data to be used to construct
congressional districts shall be election results in statewide contests since
January 1, 2008, not including the last two presidential contests. Data
identifying the race of individuals or voters shall not be used in the
construction or consideration of districts in the 2016 Contingent
Congressional Plan. Voting districts (“VTDs”) should be split when
necessary to comply with the zero deviation population requirements
set forth above in order to ensure the integrity of political data.
Id. (emphasis added)

15
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 15 of 28

 It took mapmakers only one day, using the “political data” specified in the

19.

2016 Adopted Criteria, to draft a new congressional redistricting plan that would preserve
and maintain the Republican Party’s 10-3 partisan advantage. That plan was presented to
and approved by the Joint Committee on February 17, 2016.
20.

The next day, February 18, 2016, the new 2016 Plan was introduced in the

North Carolina Senate and was passed that same day in a straight party-line vote of 32
Republicans voting for the Plan and 15 Democrats voting against it.
21.

The new 2016 Plan was introduced in the House of Representatives on the

following day, February 19, 2016, and was passed and thus enacted into law by another
straight party-line vote, with 65 Republicans voting for the Plan and 43 Democrats
opposing it.
22.

A true and correct copy of the final 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan

as enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly is attached hereto as Exhibit B and is
incorporated herein by reference.
23.

As of the date of enactment of the 2016 Plan, there were 2,634,903

registered Democrats, 1,976,873 registered Republicans, and 1,844,264 unaffiliated
registered voters in North Carolina. N.C. Voter Statistics Results, Reporting Period:
2/20/2016, North Carolina State Board of Elections,
http://enr.ncsbe.gov/voter_stats/results.aspx?date=02-20-2016. In other words,
Defendants enacted a plan designed to give Republicans a 10-3 seat majority when
Republicans comprised only 30% of the registered voters.

16
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 16 of 28

 24.

A statistical analysis of the 2016 Plan will confirm that the gerrymander of

North Carolina’s thirteen congressional districts to perpetuate the 10-3 partisan advantage
in favor of the Republican Party and Republican candidates is intentional and is not the
product of chance or the neutral application of legitimate redistricting principles.
Hundreds of alternative plans can be drawn based on traditional redistricting principles
that would have been far less partisan than the 2016 Plan, and that would have created
districts more likely to result in the election of a congressional delegation more
representative of the support of Democratic and Republican candidates by the voters of
North Carolina. The statistical likelihood that the 10-3 partisan advantage in favor of the
Republican Party and Republican candidates created by the 2016 Plan is the result of
chance is virtually nonexistent.
COUNT ONE
25.

The facts alleged above in paragraphs 1-24 are hereby incorporated by

reference as allegations of Count One of the complaint.
26.

The 2016 North Carolina Congressional Redistricting Plan as a whole and

each of the thirteen individual districts created by that Plan violate the First Amendment
and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the
United States, are invalid, and should be enjoined. See Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island,
517 U.S. 484, 489 n.1, 116 S. Ct. 1495, 1501 n.1 (1996) (applying the First Amendment
to the states).

17
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 17 of 28

 27.

The First Amendment “has its fullest and most urgent application … to the

conduct of campaigns for political office,” McCutcheon v. FEC, 572 U.S. __, 134 S. Ct.
1434, 1441(2014). It protects the right of voters to join or support a political party, and to
vote for the candidate of their choice, which are the “core of those activities protected by
the First Amendment” without which a representative democracy cannot function. Elrod
v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 356, 96 S. Ct. 2673, 2681 (1976) (plurality opinion).
28.

“Partisan gerrymanders . . . are incompatible with democratic principles.”

Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Indep. Redistricting Comm’n, 576 U.S. __, 135 S.
Ct. 2652, 2658 (2015) (alterations adopted); see Vieth v. Jubelirer, 541 U.S. 267, 292,
124 S. Ct. 1769, 1785 (2004) (Scalia, J., plurality opinion); Vieth, 541 U.S. at 316, 124 S.
Ct. at 1798 (Kennedy, J., concurring); Vieth, 541 U.S. at 324, 124 S. Ct. at 1803 (Stevens,
J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); see also Harris v. Ariz. Indep. Redistricting
Comm’n, 578 U.S. __, 136 S. Ct. 1301, 1310 (2016) (“assuming, without deciding, that
partisanship is an illegitimate redistricting factor”); N.C. State Conference of the NAACP
v. McCrory, No. 16-1468, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13797, at *33 n.6 (4th Cir. July 29,
2016) (“Of course, state legislators also cannot impermissibly dilute or deny the votes of
opponent political parties…as this same General Assembly was found to have done
earlier this year.”) (internal citations omitted) (citing Raleigh Wake Citizens Ass’n v.
Wake Cty. Bd. of Elections, No. 16-1270, 2016 WL 3568147 (4th Cir. July 1, 2016)).
29.

The 2016 Plan violates the First Amendment by favoring some voters (e.g.,

Republican supporters of the party in power) and by burdening or penalizing other voters

18
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 18 of 28

 (e.g., Democratic voters) based on the content of the voters’ political expression or
beliefs, their political party memberships or affiliations, or their voting histories in favor
of a political party or its candidates. See Vieth, 541 U.S. at 314–16, 124 S. Ct. at 1797–
98 (Kennedy, J., concurring); see also id. at 324, 124 S. Ct. at 1803 (Stevens, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part); LULAC v. Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 461-62, 126 S.
Ct. 2594, 2634–35 (2006) (Stevens, J., joined by Breyer, J., concurring in part and
dissenting in part).
30.

The Republican majority in the North Carolina General Assembly also

violated the First Amendment by using the partisan “political data” specified in the 2016
Adopted Criteria to draft and enact the 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan to
perpetuate and maintain the Republicans’ 10-3 advantage in the North Carolina
congressional delegation by intentionally favoring Republican voters over Democratic
voters based on their political beliefs, party affiliations, and voting histories.
31.

The 2016 Plan impinges on “the First Amendment interest of not burdening

or penalizing citizens because of their participation in the electoral process, their voting
history, their association with a political party, or their expression of political views.
Under general First Amendment principles, those burdens … are unconstitutional absent
a compelling [state] interest.” Vieth, 541 U.S. at 314, 124 S. Ct. at 1797 (Kennedy, J.,
concurring) (citation omitted); see also id. at 324, 124 S. Ct. at 1803 (Stevens, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part); LULAC, 548 U.S. at 461–62, 126 S. Ct. at
2634–35 (Stevens, J., joined by Breyer, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).

19
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 19 of 28

 32.

The 2016 Plan also violates the First Amendment duty of state governments

and state officials to govern impartially and maintain a position of strict political
neutrality in the adoption of laws that distribute political representation and power among
the people through the apportionment of congressional and state legislative districts.
33.

The First Amendment duty to govern impartially was violated when the

majority party in the North Carolina General Assembly used its control of the
congressional redistricting process for partisan advantage—to maximize and entrench its
hold on political power by gerrymandering the districts in its favor, making it more
difficult for the NCDP and its members to elect the candidates of their choice to
Congress.
34.

The purpose and the effect of the 2016 Plan was to give the Republican

Party and Republican candidates for Congress in North Carolina a partisan advantage
over the NCDP and Democratic candidates. The 2016 Plan enhances the effectiveness of
the votes of as many Republican voters as possible by creating ten districts with safe
Republican majorities, in which votes cast by Democratic voters are diluted or nullified
and have no effect on the outcome of the general congressional election in those districts.
35.

The purpose and effect of the 2016 Plan was also to burden and penalize

both the NCDP and Democratic voters by: (i) packing as many Democratic voters as
possible into the First, Fourth, and Twelfth Congressional Districts, where the excess
votes of Democratic voters beyond those necessary to elect a Democratic candidate of
their choice would be essentially wasted; and (ii) diluting or nullifying the votes of the

20
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 20 of 28

 remaining Democratic voters who reside outside of these three districts by dispersing (or
“cracking”) all remaining Democratic voters among the other ten districts which were
safe Republican majorities, where their (the Democrats’) votes in favor of Democratic
candidates cannot affect the outcome of the general election. These actions denied the
NCDP and its voters a fair opportunity to elect a Democratic candidate of their choice in
any of these ten Republican-dominated districts.
36.

Although the 2016 Plan only divided thirteen counties, any one of

thousands of alternative plans could have been enacted by the General Assembly that also
would have only divided thirteen counties without creating a disproportionate 10-3
partisan advantage in favor of the Republican Party and its candidates.
37.

The 2016 Plan as a whole, and each of its thirteen individual districts, were

gerrymandered based on the content of the political beliefs, political affiliations, and
voting histories of the voters in each district and are, both individually and collectively,
subject to strict scrutiny.
38.

The 2016 Plan is not justified by any legitimate state interest of such

compelling and paramount importance that justifies burdening or penalizing the First
Amendment rights of Democratic voters and the NCDP.
COUNT TWO
39.

The facts alleged in paragraphs 1-24 are hereby incorporated by reference

as allegations of Count Two of the complaint.

21
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 21 of 28

 40.

The 2016 North Carolina Congressional Redistricting Plan and each of the

thirteen individual districts created by that Plan deprive the NCDP and Democratic voters
of equal protection of the laws in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, are invalid,
and their enforcement should be enjoined.
41.

“The object of districting is to establish ‘fair and effective representation

for all citizens.’” Vieth, 541 U.S. at 307, 124 S. Ct. at 1793 (Kennedy, J., concurring)
(quoting Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 565–66, 84 S. Ct. 1362, 1383 (1964)).
42.

The right to vote is “fundamental,” and once that right “is granted to the

electorate, lines may not be drawn which are inconsistent with the Equal Protection
Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 104–05, 121 S. Ct.
525, 530 (2000) (quoting Harper v. Va. Bd. of Elections, 383 U.S. 663, 665, 86 S. Ct.
1079, 1081 (1966)); see also Raleigh Wake Citizens Ass’n, 2016 WL 3568147, at *1.
43.

The desire on the part of the party in power to gain a partisan advantage and

to “harm a politically [weak or] unpopular group” by gerrymandering congressional
districts is not “a legitimate governmental interest.” United States Dep’t of Agric. v.
Moreno, 413 U.S. 528, 534, 93 S. Ct. 2821, 2826 (1973) (emphasis added); see also City
of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctrs., 473 U.S. 432, 446–47, 105 S. Ct. 3249, 3258
(1985).
44.

The admitted, primary, and predominant objective of the 2016 Plan was to

deprive the NCDP and Democratic voters of fair and effective representation and to
perpetuate the Republican majority’s ten-three (10-3) partisan advantage created by the

22
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 22 of 28

 2011 Plan (and thereby entrench the Republican Party’s majority in the U.S. Congress).
The 2016 Plan achieves this objective by drawing congressional districts that
discriminate in favor of the Republican Party and Republican voters and against the
NCDP and Democratic voters by systematically making it more difficult for the NCDP
and Democratic voters to elect a candidate of their choice in ten of North Carolina’s
thirteen congressional districts.
45.

The 2016 Plan as a whole, and each of the thirteen individual districts, are

subject to strict scrutiny. They cannot be justified by any legitimate state interest of
compelling importance that could not be achieved by a more carefully drawn plan or that
made it necessary to discriminate against the NCDP and Democratic voters.
COUNT THREE
46.

The facts alleged in paragraphs 1-24 are hereby incorporated by reference

as allegations of Count Three of the complaint.
47.

The 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan and each of the thirteen

individual districts created by that Plan violate Article I, § 2 of the U.S. Constitution, are
therefore invalid, and should be enjoined.
48.

In the Great Compromise, the Framers of the U.S. Constitution agreed to

allow the state legislatures to elect members of the Senate from their respective states,
U.S. Const., Art. I, § 3, on the condition that members of the House of Representatives be
elected by a popular vote of the people in each state, whose qualifications to vote as

23
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 23 of 28

 “electors” were to be the same as the qualifications to vote for the most numerous house
of each state’s legislature. Id. § 2.
49.

Instead of allowing the “people of the several states” in each district to

make that decision for themselves in an open and fair election that has not been rigged by
the state legislature, the 2016 Plan violates Article I, § 2 by allowing the majority party in
a state legislature to choose the members of the House of Representatives elected to
represent each district.
COUNT FOUR
50.

The facts alleged in paragraphs 1-24 above are hereby incorporated by

reference as allegations of Count Four of the complaint.
51.

The 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan and each of the thirteen

individual districts created by that Plan are invalid because they were adopted in excess
of the authority granted to the North Carolina General Assembly by Article I, § 4 of the
U.S. Constitution to determine “the Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections” of
members of the House of Representatives, which is the sole source of a state’s authority
to draw congressional district lines.
52.

The authority granted by the Constitution to the legislatures of the states to

“prescribe” the “Times, Places and Manner” of elections of members of the House of
Representatives is not unlimited. It only allows the legislatures to adopt procedural rules
for the conduct of congressional elections, and does not include the power to dictate or
control the electoral outcomes of those elections. See Cook v. Gralike, 531 U.S. 510,

24
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 24 of 28

 523, 121 S. Ct. 1029, 1038 (2001); U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779,
808–10, 115 S. Ct. 1842, 1857–58 (1995).
53.

The 2016 Plan is a naked attempt by the majority party in a state legislature

to dictate and control the outcome of the general election for members of the House of
Representatives by drawing the district lines to virtually guarantee the election of the
majority party’s candidates in ten of the thirteen districts. The 2016 Plan makes it more
difficult, if not impossible, for Democratic candidates to be elected from those districts
and, conversely, to limit the number of Democrats elected to Congress by putting
supermajorities of Democratic voters in the three remaining districts (the First, Fourth
and Twelfth Congressional Districts).
54.

The Republican majority exceeded its constitutional authority by

gerrymandering North Carolina’s thirteen congressional districts for partisan purposes to
give the Republican Party a 10-3 seat advantage over the NCDP, and the 2016 North
Carolina Congressional Redistricting Plan is thus ultra vires and should be enjoined.
INJURY AND IRREPARABLE HARM
55.

The defendants’ violations of the Constitution have caused a direct,

concrete, and particularized injury to Common Cause and its Democratic members in
North Carolina, to the Democratic Party and to Democratic voters in North Carolina, and
to the individual Democratic-voter plaintiffs. Their injuries include, inter alia, the
following:

25
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 25 of 28

 (a)

The 2016 Plan has made it more difficult, if not impossible, for a

Democratic candidate to be elected in the general election to the House of
Representatives from each of the ten districts that have been gerrymandered to have safe
Republican majorities;
(b)

The 2016 Plan has injured the Democratic-voter plaintiffs and other

Democratic voters who reside in congressional districts that formerly had Democratic
majorities during the 2002–2010 election cycles. The 2016 Plan dilutes or nullifies the
effectiveness of their votes and deprives them of the opportunity to elect the candidate of
their choice by cracking and disbursing them among one of the ten districts with safe
Republican majorities in which their votes in favor of a Democratic candidate no longer
matter and cannot affect the outcome of the general election;
(c)

The 2016 plan also has injured Democratic voters who have been packed

into three districts gerrymandered to contain large Democratic supermajorities, where
their votes in favor of the Democratic candidate in the general election in excess of the
majority required to enable them to elect the Democratic candidate of their choice have
been and will be largely wasted and have no more effect than if they had not voted.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Wherefore the plaintiffs respectfully pray that:
(a)

a three-judge district court be convened to hear and determine the plaintiffs’

claims that the 2016 North Carolina Congressional Redistricting statute, N.C. Sess. Law.
2016-1, adopted on February 19, 2016, is unconstitutional;

26
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 26 of 28

 (b)

the Court grant a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 that

the 2016 North Carolina Congressional Redistricting statute, and each of the thirteen
districts created by that statute, are unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders;
(c)

the Court enter a preliminary and a permanent injunction prohibiting the

defendants from enforcing or attempting to enforce the 2016 North Carolina
Congressional Redistricting statute, or from conducting primary or general elections for
members of the House of Representatives under its provisions;
(d)

the Court enjoin the North Carolina General Assembly from creating any

future legislative districts with the purpose or effect of burdening or penalizing an
identifiable group, a political party, or individual voters based on their political beliefs,
political party membership, registration, affiliations or political activities, or voting
histories;
(e)

the Court also enjoin the North Carolina General Assembly from using

“political data” in any future redistricting process to burden or penalize an identifiable
group, a political party, or individual voters based on their political beliefs, political-party
membership, registration, affiliations or political activities, or voting histories;
(f)

the Court award plaintiffs their reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988; and
(g)

the Court grant plaintiffs such other and further relief as may be just and

equitable.
Respectfully submitted, this 5th day of August, 2016.

27
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 27 of 28

 /s/ Emmet J. Bondurant
Emmet J. Bondurant
Georgia Bar No. 066900
Jason J. Carter
Georgia Bar No. 141669
Benjamin W. Thorpe
Georgia Bar No. 874911
BONDURANT, MIXSON & ELMORE, LLP
1201 W. Peachtree Street, NW, Suite 3900
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone (404) 881-4100
Facsimile (404) 881-4111
bondurant@bmelaw.com
carter@bmelaw.com
bthorpe@bmelaw.com
/s/ Gregory L. Diskant
Gregory L. Diskant
New York Bar No. 1047240
Susan Millenky
New York Bar No. 5045570
PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP
1133 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Telephone: (212) 336-2000
Facsimile: (212) 336-2222
gldiskant@pbwt.com
smillenky@pbwt.com
/s/ Edwin M. Speas, Jr.
Edwin M. Speas, Jr.
North Carolina Bar No. 4112
Caroline P. Mackie
North Carolina Bar No. 41512
POYNER SPRUILL LLP
301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1900
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
espeas@poynerspruill.com
cmackie@poynerspruill.com
Counsel for Plaintiffs

28
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 28 of 28

 Case Document 1-1 Filed 08/05/16 Pace 1 of 3





2016 Contingent Congressional Plan Committee Adopted Criteria
Equal Population
The Committee will use the 2010 federal decennial census data as the sole
basis of population for the establishment of districts in the 2016 Contingent
Congressional Plan. The number of persons in each congressional district shall be
as nearly as equal as practicable, as determined under the most recent federal
decennial census.
Contiguity
Congressional districts shall be comprised of contiguous territory.
Contiguity by water is sufficient.

Political data
The only data other than population data to be used to construct
congressional districts shall be election results in statewide contests since January
1, 2008, not including the last two presidential contests. Data identifying the race
of individuals or voters shall not be used in the construction or consideration of
districts in the 2016 Contingent Congressional Plan. Voting districts (“VTDs”)
should be split only when necessary to comply with the zero deviation population
requirements set forth above in order to ensure the integrity of political data.

Partisan Advantage
The partisan makeup of the congressional delegation under the enacted plan
is 10 Republicans and 3 Democrats. The Committee shall make reasonable efforts
to construct districts in the 2016 Contingent Congressional Plan to maintain the
current partisan makeup of North Carolina’s congressional delegation.
Twelfth District
The current General Assembly inherited the configuration of the Twelfth
District from past General Assemblies. This configuration was retained because the
district had already been heavily litigated over the past two decades and ultimately
approved by the courts. The Harris court has criticized the shape of the Twelfth

Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1-1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 2 of 3

 District citing its “serpentine” nature. In light of this, the Committee shall construct
districts in the 2016 Contingent Congressional Plan that eliminate the current
configuration of the Twelfth District.
Compactness
In light of the Harris court’s criticism of the compactness of the First and
Twelfth Districts, the Committee shall make reasonable efforts to construct
districts in the 2016 Contingent Congressional Plan that improve the compactness
of the current districts and keep more counties and VTDs whole as compared to the
current enacted plan. Division of counties shall only be made for reasons of
equalizing population, consideration of incumbency and political impact.
Reasonable efforts shall be made not to divide a county into more than two
districts.
Incumbency
Candidates for Congress are not required by law to reside in a district they
seek to represent. However, reasonable efforts shall be made to ensure that
incumbent members of Congress are not paired with another incumbent in one of
the new districts constructed in the 2016 Contingent Congressional Plan.

Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1-1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 3 of 3

 Case Document 1-2 Filed 08/05/16 Pace 1 of 10



GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
EXTRA SESSION 2016
SESSION LAW 2016-1
SENATE BILL 2
AN ACT TO REALIGN THE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS, AS RECOMMENDED BY
THE JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE ON CONGRESSIONAL REDISTRICTING, TO
COMPLY WITH THE COURT ORDER IN HARRIS V. MCCRORY.
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
SECTION 1. G.S. 163-201(a) is rewritten to read:
"(a) For purposes of nominating and electing members of the House of Representatives
of the Congress of the United States in 2016 and every two years thereafter; the State of North
Carolina shall be divided into 13 districts as follows:
District 01: Bertie County, Durham County: VTD 01, VTD 02, VTD 03, VTD 04, VTD 05,
VTD 06, VTD 07, VTD 08, VTD 09, VTD 10, VTD 12, VTD 13, VTD 14, VTD 15, VTD
16, VTD 17, VTD 18, VTD 19, VTD 20, VTD 21, VTD 22, VTD 23, VTD 24, VTD 25,
VTD 26, VTD 27, VTD 28, VTD 29, VTD 30-1, VTD 30-2, VTD 31, VTD 32, VTD 34,
VTD 36, VTD 37, VTD 38, VTD 39, VTD 40, VTD 41, VTD 42, VTD 43, VTD 44, VTD
45, VTD 46, VTD 47, VTD 48, VTD 50, VTD 51, VTD 52, VTD 54, VTD 55; Edgecombe
County, Gates County, Granville County, Halifax County, Hertford County, Martin County,
Northampton County, Pitt County: VTD 0301, VTD 0401, VTD 0501, VTD 1201, VTD
1501, VTD 1503, VTD 1504, VTD 1505A, VTD 1505B, VTD 1506, VTD 1507, VTD
1507B, VTD 1508A, VTD 1508B, VTD 1509: Block(s) 1470003021000, 1470003021001,
1470003021002, 1470003021003, 1470003021004, 1470003021005, 1470003021006,
1470003021007, 1470003021008, 1470003021009, 1470003021010, 1470003021011,
1470003021012, 1470003021013, 1470003021014, 1470003021015, 1470003021016,
1470003022000, 1470003022001, 1470003022002, 1470003022003, 1470003022004,
1470003022005, 1470003022006, 1470003022007, 1470003022008, 1470003022009,
1470003022010, 1470003022011, 1470003022012, 1470003022013, 1470003022014,
1470003022015, 1470003022016, 1470003022021, 1470003023000, 1470003023001,
1470003023002, 1470003023003, 1470003023004, 1470003023005, 1470003023006,
1470003023007, 1470003023008, 1470003023009, 1470003023010, 1470003023013,
1470003023014, 1470003023025, 1470003023026, 1470004003005, 1470004003015,
1470004004003, 1470004004004, 1470009002028, 1470009002029, 1470009002030,
1470009002043, 1470009002059, 1470009002060, 1470009002061, 1470009002062,
1470009002063, 1470009002064, 1470009002065, 1470009002066, 1470009002067,
1470009002068, 1470009002069, 1470009002070, 1470009002071, 1470009002072,
1470009002074, 1470009002075, 1470009002102, 1470009002103, 1470009002104,
1470009002105, 1470009002106, 1470010011033, 1470010011034, 1470010011035,
1470010011036, 1470010011037, 1470010011038, 1470010011039, 1470010011040,
1470010011041, 1470010011042, 1470010011043, 1470010011044, 1470010011045,
1470010011046, 1470010011047, 1470010011048, 1470010011049, 1470010011050; VTD
1512A, VTD 1512B; Vance County, Warren County, Washington County, Wilson County:
VTD PRGA, VTD PRSA, VTD PRST, VTD PRTA: Block(s) 1950014001025,
1950014001033, 1950014001042, 1950014001043, 1950014001045, 1950014001046,
1950014001047, 1950014001048, 1950014001051, 1950014001054, 1950014001055,
1950014001056, 1950014001057, 1950014001059; VTD PRTO, VTD PRWA, VTD
PRWB, VTD PRWC, VTD PRWD, VTD PRWE, VTD PRWH, VTD PRWI, VTD PRWJ,
VTD PRWK, VTD PRWL, VTD PRWM, VTD PRWN, VTD PRWP, VTD PRWQ, VTD
PRWR.

*S2-v-4*

Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1-2 Filed 08/05/16 Page 2 of 10

 General Assembly Of North Carolina

Extra Session 2016

District 02: Franklin County, Harnett County, Johnston County: VTD PR05, VTD PR09, VTD
PR10, VTD PR11A, VTD PR11B, VTD PR12, VTD PR19, VTD PR20, VTD PR21, VTD
PR24, VTD PR25, VTD PR26: Block(s) 1010406001016, 1010408001000,
1010408001001, 1010408001002, 1010408001017, 1010408001018; VTD PR27, VTD
PR28, VTD PR29A, VTD PR29B, VTD PR30, VTD PR31A, VTD PR31B, VTD PR32,
VTD PR34; Nash County, Wake County: VTD 01-42, VTD 01-47, VTD 02-01, VTD 02-02,
VTD 02-03, VTD 02-04, VTD 02-05, VTD 02-06, VTD 03-00, VTD 04-07, VTD 06-01,
VTD 06-04, VTD 06-05, VTD 06-06, VTD 06-07, VTD 08-04, VTD 08-07, VTD 08-08,
VTD 09-01, VTD 09-02, VTD 09-03, VTD 10-01, VTD 10-02, VTD 10-03, VTD 10-04,
VTD 12-01, VTD 12-02, VTD 12-04, VTD 12-05, VTD 12-06, VTD 12-07, VTD 12-08,
VTD 12-09, VTD 13-10, VTD 13-11, VTD 14-01, VTD 14-02, VTD 15-01, VTD 15-02,
VTD 15-03, VTD 15-04, VTD 16-01, VTD 16-05: Block(s) 1830528021000,
1830528021001, 1830528021002, 1830528021003, 1830528021004, 1830528021005,
1830528021006, 1830528021007, 1830528021008, 1830528021009, 1830528021010,
1830528021011, 1830528021012, 1830528021013, 1830528021014, 1830528021015,
1830528021016, 1830528021017, 1830528021018, 1830528021019, 1830528021021,
1830528021022, 1830528021023, 1830528021024, 1830528021025, 1830528021026,
1830528021027, 1830528021028, 1830528021029, 1830528021030, 1830528021032,
1830528023006, 1830528023007, 1830528023008, 1830528023009, 1830528023010,
1830528023011, 1830528023012, 1830528023014, 1830528023015, 1830528023016,
1830528023017, 1830528023018, 1830528023019, 1830528023020, 1830528023021,
1830528024008, 1830528024010, 1830528024012, 1830528024014, 1830528024017,
1830528024018, 1830528024019, 1830528024021, 1830530093000, 1830530093001,
1830530093002, 1830530093003, 1830530093004, 1830530093005, 1830530093006,
1830530093007, 1830530093008, 1830530093009, 1830530093010, 1830530093011,
1830530093012, 1830530093013, 1830530093014, 1830530093015, 1830530093016,
1830530093017, 1830530093018, 1830530093019, 1830530093020, 1830530093021,
1830545002052, 1830545002069, 1830545002071, 1830545002078, 1830545002079; VTD
16-09, VTD 17-06, VTD 18-02, VTD 18-03, VTD 18-04, VTD 18-05, VTD 18-07, VTD
19-03, VTD 19-04, VTD 19-05, VTD 19-06, VTD 19-07, VTD 19-09, VTD 19-10, VTD
19-11, VTD 19-12, VTD 20-05, VTD 20-06, VTD 20-08, VTD 20-11, VTD 20-12; Wilson
County: VTD PRBL, VTD PRCR, VTD PROL, VTD PRSP, VTD PRTA: Block(s)
1950014001000, 1950014001001, 1950014001002, 1950014001003, 1950014001004,
1950014001005, 1950014001006, 1950014001007, 1950014001008, 1950014001009,
1950014001010, 1950014001011, 1950014001012, 1950014001013, 1950014001014,
1950014001015, 1950014001016, 1950014001017, 1950014001018, 1950014001019,
1950014001020, 1950014001021, 1950014001022, 1950014001023, 1950014001024,
1950014001026, 1950014001027, 1950014001028, 1950014001029, 1950014001030,
1950014001031, 1950014001032, 1950014001034, 1950014001035, 1950014001036,
1950014001037, 1950014001038, 1950014001039, 1950014001040, 1950014001041,
1950014001044, 1950014001049, 1950014001050, 1950014001052, 1950014001053,
1950014001058, 1950014001060, 1950014001061, 1950014002000, 1950014002001,
1950014002002, 1950014002003, 1950014002004, 1950014002005, 1950014002006,
1950014002007, 1950014002008, 1950014002009, 1950014002010, 1950014002011,
1950014002012, 1950014002013, 1950014002014, 1950014002015, 1950014002016,
1950014002017, 1950014002018, 1950014002019, 1950014002020, 1950014002021,
1950014002022, 1950014002023, 1950014002024, 1950014002025, 1950014002026,
1950014002027, 1950014002028, 1950014002029, 1950014002030, 1950014002031,
1950014002032, 1950014002033, 1950014002034, 1950014002035, 1950014002036,
1950014002037, 1950014002038, 1950014002039, 1950014002040, 1950014002041,
1950014002042, 1950014002043, 1950014002044, 1950014002045, 1950014002046,
1950014002047, 1950014002048, 1950014002049, 1950014002050, 1950014002051,
1950014002052, 1950014002053, 1950014002054, 1950014002055, 1950014002056,
1950014002057, 1950014002058, 1950014002059, 1950014002060, 1950014002061,
1950014002062, 1950014002063, 1950014002064, 1950014002065, 1950014002066,
1950014002067, 1950014002068, 1950014002069, 1950014002070, 1950014002071,
1950014002072, 1950014002073, 1950014002074, 1950014002075, 1950014002076,
1950015002000, 1950015002001, 1950015002002, 1950015002013, 1950015002014,
1950015002015, 1950015002017, 1950015002019.
Page 2

Session Law 2016-1
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1-2 Filed 08/05/16 Page 3 of 10

Senate Bill 2

 General Assembly Of North Carolina

Extra Session 2016

District 03: Beaufort County, Camden County, Carteret County, Chowan County, Craven
County, Currituck County, Dare County, Greene County, Hyde County, Jones County,
Lenoir County, Onslow County, Pamlico County, Pasquotank County, Perquimans County,
Pitt County: VTD 0101, VTD 0200A, VTD 0200B, VTD 0601, VTD 0701, VTD 0800A,
VTD 0800B, VTD 0901, VTD 1001, VTD 1101, VTD 1102A, VTD 1102B, VTD 1301,
VTD 1402A, VTD 1402B, VTD 1403A, VTD 1403B, VTD 1509: Block(s)
1470001005024, 1470002021024, 1470002021025, 1470002021026, 1470003022017,
1470003022018, 1470003022019, 1470003022020, 1470004003010, 1470004003011,
1470004003012, 1470004003013, 1470004003014, 1470004003016, 1470004003017,
1470004003018, 1470004003019, 1470004003020, 1470004003021, 1470004003022,
1470004003023, 1470004003024, 1470004003025, 1470004003026, 1470004003027,
1470004003028, 1470004003029, 1470004003030, 1470004003031, 1470004004005; VTD
1510A, VTD 1510B, VTD 1511A, VTD 1511B; Tyrrell County.
District 04: Durham County: VTD 33, VTD 35, VTD 53-1, VTD 53-2; Orange County, Wake
County: VTD 01-01, VTD 01-02, VTD 01-03, VTD 01-04, VTD 01-05, VTD 01-06, VTD
01-07, VTD 01-09, VTD 01-10, VTD 01-11, VTD 01-12, VTD 01-13, VTD 01-14, VTD
01-15, VTD 01-16, VTD 01-17, VTD 01-18, VTD 01-19, VTD 01-20, VTD 01-21, VTD
01-22, VTD 01-23, VTD 01-25, VTD 01-26, VTD 01-27, VTD 01-28, VTD 01-29, VTD
01-30, VTD 01-31, VTD 01-32, VTD 01-33, VTD 01-34, VTD 01-35, VTD 01-36, VTD
01-37, VTD 01-38, VTD 01-39, VTD 01-40, VTD 01-41, VTD 01-43, VTD 01-44, VTD
01-45, VTD 01-46, VTD 01-48, VTD 01-49, VTD 01-50, VTD 01-51, VTD 04-01, VTD
04-02, VTD 04-03, VTD 04-04, VTD 04-05, VTD 04-06, VTD 04-08, VTD 04-09, VTD
04-10, VTD 04-11, VTD 04-12, VTD 04-13, VTD 04-14, VTD 04-15, VTD 04-16, VTD
04-17, VTD 04-18, VTD 04-19, VTD 04-20, VTD 04-21, VTD 05-01, VTD 05-03, VTD
05-04, VTD 05-05, VTD 05-06, VTD 07-01, VTD 07-02, VTD 07-03, VTD 07-04, VTD
07-05, VTD 07-06, VTD 07-07, VTD 07-09, VTD 07-10, VTD 07-11, VTD 07-12, VTD
07-13, VTD 08-02, VTD 08-03, VTD 08-05, VTD 08-06, VTD 08-09, VTD 08-10, VTD
08-11, VTD 11-01, VTD 11-02, VTD 13-01, VTD 13-02, VTD 13-05, VTD 13-06, VTD
13-07, VTD 13-08, VTD 13-09, VTD 16-02, VTD 16-03, VTD 16-04, VTD 16-05: Block(s)
1830528021031, 1830528023013, 1830528023025, 1830528023026, 1830528024007,
1830528024009, 1830528024011, 1830528024013, 1830528024015, 1830528024016; VTD
16-06, VTD 16-07, VTD 16-08, VTD 17-01, VTD 17-02, VTD 17-03, VTD 17-04, VTD
17-05, VTD 17-07, VTD 17-08, VTD 17-09, VTD 17-10, VTD 17-11, VTD 18-01, VTD
18-06, VTD 18-08, VTD 19-16, VTD 19-17, VTD 20-01, VTD 20-02, VTD 20-03, VTD
20-04, VTD 20-09, VTD 20-10.
District 05: Alexander County, Alleghany County, Ashe County, Avery County, Catawba
County: VTD 29: Block(s) 0350103011000, 0350103011003, 0350103011004,
0350103011005, 0350103011006, 0350103011007, 0350103011008, 0350103011009,
0350103011010, 0350103011011, 0350103011012, 0350103011013, 0350103011014,
0350103011015, 0350103011016, 0350103011017, 0350103011018, 0350103011019,
0350103011020, 0350103011021, 0350103011022, 0350103011023, 0350103011024,
0350103011025, 0350103011026, 0350103011027, 0350103011028, 0350103011029,
0350103011030, 0350103011031, 0350103011032, 0350103011033, 0350103011034,
0350103011035, 0350103011036, 0350103011037, 0350103011038, 0350103012000,
0350103012001, 0350103012002, 0350103012003, 0350103012004, 0350103012005,
0350103012006, 0350103012007, 0350103012008, 0350103012009, 0350103012010,
0350103012011, 0350103012012, 0350103012013, 0350103012014, 0350103012015,
0350103012016, 0350103012017, 0350103012018, 0350103012019, 0350103012020,
0350103012021, 0350103012022, 0350103012023, 0350103012024, 0350103012025,
0350103012026, 0350103012027, 0350103012028, 0350103012029, 0350103012030,
0350103012031, 0350103012032, 0350103012033, 0350103012034, 0350103012035,
0350103012036, 0350103012037, 0350103012038, 0350103012039, 0350103012040,
0350103012041, 0350103012042, 0350103012043, 0350103021000, 0350103021001,
0350103021004, 0350103021005, 0350103021006, 0350103021018, 0350103021019,
0350103021020, 0350103021021, 0350103023000, 0350103023001, 0350103023002,
0350103023004, 0350103023005, 0350103023006, 0350103023010, 0350103023011,
0350103023012, 0350103023015, 0350103023016, 0350103023017, 0350103023018,
0350103023022, 0350103032001, 0350103032002, 0350103032003, 0350103032004,
Senate Bill 2

Session Law 2016-1

Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1-2 Filed 08/05/16 Page 4 of 10

Page 3

 General Assembly Of North Carolina

Extra Session 2016

0350103032006, 0350103032014; VTD 38, VTD 39; Forsyth County, Stokes County, Surry
County, Watauga County, Wilkes County, Yadkin County.
District 06: Alamance County, Caswell County, Chatham County, Guilford County: VTD
CG1, VTD CG2, VTD CG3A, VTD CG3B, VTD G02, VTD G03, VTD G04, VTD G05,
VTD G06, VTD G07, VTD G08, VTD G09, VTD G10, VTD G24, VTD G25, VTD G26,
VTD G27, VTD G28, VTD G29, VTD G40A2, VTD G68, VTD G71: Block(s)
0810110001038, 0810110001039, 0810110001053, 0810110001054, 0810110001058,
0810111011003, 0810111011004, 0810111011005, 0810111011006, 0810111011007,
0810111011008, 0810111011009, 0810111011010, 0810111011011, 0810111011013,
0810111011014, 0810111011015, 0810111011016, 0810111011017, 0810111011018,
0810111011019, 0810111011020, 0810111011021, 0810111011022, 0810111011023,
0810111011024, 0810111012000, 0810111012001, 0810111012002, 0810111012003,
0810111012004, 0810111012005, 0810111012006, 0810111012007, 0810111012008,
0810111012009, 0810111012010, 0810111012011, 0810111012012, 0810111012013,
0810111012014, 0810111012015, 0810111012016, 0810111012017, 0810111012018,
0810111012019, 0810111012020, 0810111012021, 0810111012022, 0810111012023,
0810111012024, 0810111012025, 0810111012026, 0810111012027, 0810111012028,
0810111012029, 0810111012030, 0810111012031, 0810111012032, 0810111012033,
0810111012034, 0810111012035, 0810111012036, 0810111012037, 0810111012039,
0810111012040, 0810111012041, 0810127072022, 0810128032015, 0810128032016,
0810128032017, 0810128032018, 0810128032019; VTD G72, VTD GIB, VTD GR, VTD
JEF1, VTD JEF2, VTD JEF3, VTD JEF4, VTD MON1, VTD MON2, VTD MON3, VTD
NCGR1, VTD NCGR2, VTD NCLAY2, VTD NMAD, VTD NWASH, VTD OR1, VTD
OR2, VTD RC1, VTD RC2, VTD SCLAY, VTD SF1, VTD SF2, VTD SF3, VTD SF4,
VTD SMAD, VTD STOK, VTD SWASH; Lee County, Person County, Randolph County,
Rockingham County.
District 07: Bladen County: VTD P25: Block(s) 0179506004038, 0179506004039,
0179506005007, 0179506005008, 0179506005009, 0179506005010, 0179506005011,
0179506005012, 0179506005013, 0179506005014, 0179506005015, 0179506005016,
0179506005017, 0179506005018, 0179506005022, 0179506005038, 0179506005039,
0179506005040, 0179506005041, 0179506005043, 0179506005044, 0179506005045,
0179506005046, 0179506005048, 0179506005049, 0179506005050, 0179506005051,
0179506005052, 0179506005054, 0179506005055, 0179506005056, 0179506005057,
0179506005058, 0179506005059, 0179506005060, 0179506005061, 0179506005062,
0179506005063, 0179506006000, 0179506006001, 0179506006002, 0179506006003,
0179506006004, 0179506006005, 0179506006006, 0179506006007, 0179506006010,
0179506007012; VTD P30, VTD P502, VTD P55, VTD P65, VTD P75; Brunswick County,
Columbus County, Duplin County, Johnston County: VTD PR01, VTD PR02, VTD PR03,
VTD PR04, VTD PR06, VTD PR07, VTD PR08, VTD PR13, VTD PR14, VTD PR15,
VTD PR16, VTD PR17, VTD PR18, VTD PR22, VTD PR23, VTD PR26: Block(s)
1010406001000, 1010406001001, 1010406001002, 1010406001003, 1010406001004,
1010406001005, 1010406001006, 1010406001007, 1010406001008, 1010406001009,
1010406001010, 1010406001011, 1010406001012, 1010406001013, 1010406001014,
1010406001015, 1010406001017, 1010406001018, 1010406001019, 1010406001020,
1010406001021, 1010406001022, 1010406001023, 1010406001024, 1010406001025,
1010406001026, 1010406001027, 1010406001028, 1010406001029, 1010406001030,
1010406001031, 1010406001032, 1010406001033, 1010406001034, 1010406002001,
1010406002002, 1010406002003, 1010406002004, 1010406002005, 1010406002006,
1010406002007, 1010406002008, 1010406002009, 1010406002010, 1010406002011,
1010406002012, 1010406002013, 1010406002014, 1010406002015, 1010406002016,
1010406002017, 1010406002018, 1010406002019, 1010406002020, 1010406002021,
1010406002022, 1010406002023, 1010406002025, 1010406002026, 1010406002027,
1010406002028, 1010406002029, 1010406002030, 1010406002031, 1010406002032,
1010406002037, 1010406002038, 1010406002039, 1010406003000, 1010406003001,
1010406003002, 1010406003003, 1010406003004, 1010406003005, 1010406003006,
1010406003007, 1010406003008, 1010406003009, 1010406003010, 1010406003011,
1010406003012, 1010406003013, 1010406003014, 1010406003015, 1010406003016,
1010406003017, 1010406003018, 1010406003019, 1010406003020, 1010406003021,
1010406003022, 1010406003032, 1010406003033, 1010406003034, 1010406003035,
Page 4

Session Law 2016-1
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1-2 Filed 08/05/16 Page 5 of 10

Senate Bill 2

 General Assembly Of North Carolina

Extra Session 2016

1010407002018, 1010407002019, 1010407002020, 1010407002021, 1010407002022,
1010407002023, 1010407002024, 1010407002025, 1010407002026, 1010407002027,
1010407002028, 1010407002029, 1010407002030, 1010407002031, 1010407002035,
1010407002036, 1010407002037, 1010407002038, 1010407002039, 1010407002040,
1010407002041, 1010407002042, 1010407002043, 1010407002044, 1010407002045,
1010407002046, 1010407002047, 1010407002054, 1010407002055, 1010407003029,
1010407003030, 1010407003031, 1010407003032, 1010407003033, 1010407003034,
1010407003035, 1010407003036, 1010407003041, 1010407003042, 1010408001003,
1010408001004, 1010408001008, 1010408001009, 1010408001010, 1010408001011,
1010408001012, 1010408001013, 1010408001014, 1010408001015, 1010408001016,
1010408001019, 1010408001020, 1010408001021, 1010408001022, 1010408001023,
1010408001024, 1010408001025, 1010408001026, 1010408001027, 1010408001030,
1010408001031, 1010408001032, 1010408001033, 1010408001034, 1010408001035,
1010408001036, 1010408001037, 1010408001038, 1010408001039, 1010408001041,
1010408001042, 1010408001043, 1010408001044, 1010408001046, 1010412022000,
1010412022001, 1010412022002, 1010412022003, 1010412022004, 1010412022030,
1010412022058, 1010412022059, 1010412022060, 1010412022065; VTD PR33; New
Hanover County, Pender County, Sampson County, Wayne County.
District 08: Cabarrus County, Cumberland County: VTD AH49, VTD CC03, VTD CC04,
VTD CC06, VTD CC07, VTD CC08: Block(s) 0510007021000, 0510007021001,
0510007021002, 0510007021003, 0510007021004, 0510007021007, 0510007021008,
0510007021009, 0510007021010, 0510007021011, 0510007021012, 0510007021013,
0510007021014, 0510007021015, 0510007021016, 0510007021017, 0510007021018,
0510007021020, 0510007021021, 0510007022002, 0510007022003, 0510007022004,
0510007022005, 0510008003003, 0510008003014, 0510008003015, 0510008003020,
0510008003021, 0510008003030, 0510008003031, 0510008003036; VTD CC10, VTD
CC12, VTD CC13, VTD CC14, VTD CC15, VTD CC17, VTD CC18, VTD CC19, VTD
CC21, VTD CC24, VTD CC25, VTD CC26, VTD CC27, VTD CC29, VTD CC31, VTD
CC32, VTD CC33, VTD CC34, VTD CL57, VTD CU02, VTD G10, VTD G11, VTD G2,
VTD G4, VTD G5, VTD G7, VTD G8, VTD LI65, VTD LR63, VTD MB62, VTD MR02;
Hoke County, Montgomery County, Moore County, Rowan County: VTD 01, VTD 02,
VTD 03, VTD 04, VTD 05, VTD 06, VTD 08, VTD 09, VTD 10, VTD 13, VTD 14, VTD
15, VTD 16, VTD 17, VTD 18, VTD 19, VTD 20, VTD 22, VTD 23, VTD 25, VTD 26,
VTD 28: Block(s) 1590507001000, 1590507001001, 1590507001002, 1590507001004,
1590507001005, 1590507001006, 1590507001007, 1590507001008, 1590507001009,
1590507001010, 1590507001011, 1590507001012, 1590507001013, 1590507001014,
1590507001015, 1590507001016, 1590507001017, 1590507001018, 1590507001019,
1590507001020, 1590507001021, 1590507001022, 1590507001023, 1590507001024,
1590507001025, 1590507001026, 1590507001027, 1590507001028, 1590507001029,
1590507001030, 1590507001031, 1590507001032, 1590507001033, 1590507001034,
1590507001035, 1590507001036, 1590507001037, 1590507001038, 1590507001039,
1590507001040, 1590507001041, 1590507001042, 1590507001043, 1590507001044,
1590507001045, 1590507001046, 1590507001047, 1590507001048, 1590507001049,
1590507001050, 1590507001051, 1590507002000, 1590507002001, 1590507002002,
1590507002003, 1590507002004, 1590507002005, 1590507002006, 1590507002007,
1590507002008, 1590507002009, 1590507002010, 1590507002011, 1590507002012,
1590507002013, 1590507002014, 1590507002015, 1590507002016, 1590507002017,
1590507002018, 1590507002019, 1590507002020, 1590507002021, 1590507002022,
1590507002023, 1590507002024, 1590507002025, 1590507002026, 1590507002027,
1590507002028, 1590507002029, 1590507002030, 1590507002031, 1590507002032,
1590507002033, 1590507003001, 1590507003002, 1590507003003, 1590507003004,
1590507003005, 1590507003006, 1590507003007, 1590507003008, 1590507003010,
1590507003012, 1590507003013, 1590507003014, 1590507003015, 1590507003016,
1590507003017, 1590507003018, 1590507003019, 1590507003020, 1590507003021,
1590507003022, 1590507003024, 1590507003025, 1590507003026, 1590507003030,
1590507004006, 1590507004019, 1590507004020, 1590507004021, 1590507004022,
1590507004023, 1590507004031, 1590507004032, 1590508004003, 1590508004010,
1590508004011, 1590508004017, 1590508004018, 1590508004019, 1590508004020,
1590508004028, 1590508004029, 1590508004030, 1590508004031, 1590508004032,
Senate Bill 2

Session Law 2016-1

Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1-2 Filed 08/05/16 Page 6 of 10

Page 5

 General Assembly Of North Carolina

Extra Session 2016

1590508004034, 1590508004042; VTD 30, VTD 31, VTD 33, VTD 44, VTD 46; Stanly
County.
District 09: Anson County, Bladen County: VTD P10, VTD P15, VTD P201, VTD P202, VTD
P25: Block(s) 0179506005064, 0179506005065, 0179506006008, 0179506006009,
0179506006011, 0179506006012, 0179506006013, 0179506006014, 0179506006015,
0179506006016, 0179506006017, 0179506006018, 0179506006019, 0179506006020,
0179506006021, 0179506006022, 0179506006023, 0179506006024, 0179506006025,
0179506006026, 0179506006027, 0179506006028, 0179506006029, 0179506006030,
0179506006031, 0179506006032, 0179506006033, 0179506006034, 0179506006035,
0179506006036, 0179506006037, 0179506006038, 0179506006039, 0179506006040,
0179506006041, 0179506006042, 0179506006043, 0179506006044, 0179506006045,
0179506006046, 0179506006047, 0179506006048, 0179506006049, 0179506006050,
0179506006051, 0179506006052, 0179506006053, 0179506006054, 0179506006055,
0179506006056, 0179506006057, 0179506006058, 0179506006059, 0179506006060,
0179506006061, 0179506006062, 0179506006063, 0179506006064, 0179506006065,
0179506006066, 0179506006067, 0179506007000, 0179506007003, 0179506007004,
0179506007011, 0179506007029, 0179506007030, 0179506007060, 0179506007061,
0179506007062, 0179506007063, 0179506007064, 0179506007065, 0179506007066,
0179506007067, 0179506007068, 0179506007069, 0179506007070, 0179506007071,
0179506007072, 0179506007073, 0179506007074, 0179506007075, 0179506007076,
0179506007077, 0179506007078, 0179506007082, 0179506007083, 0179506007084,
0179506007085, 0179506007086, 0179506007087, 0179506007088, 0179506007089; VTD
P35, VTD P40, VTD P45, VTD P501, VTD P60, VTD P70, VTD P80; Cumberland County:
VTD AL51, VTD CC01, VTD CC05, VTD CC08: Block(s) 0510007021019,
0510007021022, 0510007021023, 0510007021024, 0510007021025, 0510007022000,
0510007022001, 0510007022009, 0510007022012, 0510008003029, 0510008003037; VTD
CC16, VTD EO61-1, VTD EO61-2, VTD G1, VTD G3, VTD G6, VTD G9, VTD SH77;
Mecklenburg County: VTD 001, VTD 002: Block(s) 1190026001002, 1190026001003,
1190026001004, 1190026001005, 1190026001011, 1190026001012, 1190026001013,
1190026001014, 1190026001015, 1190026001016, 1190026001017, 1190026001018,
1190026001019, 1190026001020; VTD 008, VTD 018, VTD 019, VTD 032, VTD 048,
VTD 057, VTD 069, VTD 070, VTD 071, VTD 072, VTD 073, VTD 074, VTD 075, VTD
076, VTD 086, VTD 090, VTD 091, VTD 092, VTD 093, VTD 096, VTD 100, VTD 101,
VTD 103, VTD 110, VTD 111, VTD 112, VTD 113, VTD 114, VTD 118, VTD 119, VTD
121, VTD 131, VTD 136, VTD 137, VTD 139.1, VTD 144, VTD 215, VTD 216, VTD 217,
VTD 218, VTD 219, VTD 220, VTD 221, VTD 226, VTD 227, VTD 232, VTD 233, VTD
236; Richmond County, Robeson County, Scotland County, Union County.
District 10: Buncombe County: VTD 01.1, VTD 02.1, VTD 03.1, VTD 06.1, VTD 07.1, VTD
09.1, VTD 10.1, VTD 100.1, VTD 102.1, VTD 103.1, VTD 104.1, VTD 11.1, VTD 12.1,
VTD 14.2: Block(s) 0210002001019, 0210002001020, 0210002001035, 0210003001031,
0210003001032, 0210009002023, 0210010001000, 0210010001001, 0210010001002,
0210010001003, 0210010001004, 0210010001005, 0210010001006, 0210010001008,
0210010001009, 0210010001042, 0210011001000, 0210011001001, 0210011001002,
0210011001003, 0210011001004, 0210011001005, 0210011001006, 0210011001007,
0210011001008, 0210011001009, 0210011001010, 0210011001011, 0210011001012,
0210011001013, 0210011001014, 0210011001015, 0210011001016, 0210011001017,
0210011001018, 0210011001019, 0210011001020, 0210011001027, 0210011001028,
0210011001029, 0210011001031, 0210011001035, 0210011001037, 0210011001038,
0210011001039, 0210014001002, 0210014001003, 0210014001009, 0210014001012,
0210014001014, 0210014001016, 0210014001017, 0210014001018, 0210014001019,
0210014001020, 0210014001021, 0210014001022, 0210014001023, 0210014001024,
0210014001025, 0210014001026, 0210014001027, 0210014001028, 0210014001029,
0210014001030, 0210014001031, 0210014001032, 0210014001033, 0210014001034,
0210014001035, 0210014001036, 0210014002000, 0210014002001, 0210014002002,
0210014002003, 0210014002004, 0210014002005, 0210014002006, 0210014002007,
0210014002008, 0210014003011, 0210014003012, 0210014003014, 0210014003015,
0210014003016, 0210014003019, 0210014003025, 0210014003026, 0210014003027,
0210014003030, 0210014003031, 0210014003032; VTD 17.1, VTD 19.1, VTD 20.1, VTD
25.1, VTD 28.1, VTD 32.1, VTD 33.2, VTD 33.3, VTD 34.1, VTD 35.1, VTD 36.1, VTD
Page 6

Session Law 2016-1
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1-2 Filed 08/05/16 Page 7 of 10

Senate Bill 2

 General Assembly Of North Carolina

Extra Session 2016

37.1, VTD 38.2, VTD 38.3, VTD 39.1, VTD 55.1, VTD 57.1, VTD 60.2, VTD 61.1, VTD
62.1, VTD 64.1, VTD 65.1, VTD 66.1; Catawba County: VTD 01, VTD 02, VTD 03, VTD
04, VTD 05, VTD 06, VTD 07, VTD 08, VTD 09, VTD 10, VTD 11, VTD 12, VTD 13,
VTD 14, VTD 15, VTD 16, VTD 17, VTD 19, VTD 20, VTD 21, VTD 22, VTD 23, VTD
24, VTD 25, VTD 26, VTD 27, VTD 28, VTD 29: Block(s) 0350103023013,
0350103023014, 0350103023019, 0350103023020, 0350103032000, 0350103032005,
0350103032007, 0350103032008, 0350103032009, 0350103032010, 0350103032011,
0350103032015, 0350103032016, 0350103032043, 0350103032044; VTD 30, VTD 31,
VTD 32, VTD 33, VTD 34, VTD 35, VTD 36, VTD 37, VTD 40, VTD 41; Cleveland
County, Gaston County, Iredell County: VTD FT: Block(s) 0970611032017,
0970611032029, 0970612011012, 0970612011013, 0970612011014, 0970612011015,
0970612011016, 0970612021015, 0970612021016, 0970612021018, 0970612021019,
0970612021036, 0970612021041, 0970612021042, 0970612021043, 0970612021044,
0970612021045, 0970612021046, 0970612021047, 0970612023046, 0970612023050,
0970612023051, 0970612023052, 0970612031001, 0970612031009, 0970612031010,
0970612031011, 0970612031012, 0970612031017, 0970612031019, 0970612031020,
0970612031021, 0970612031030, 0970612031031, 0970612041000, 0970612041001,
0970612041002, 0970612041003, 0970612041004, 0970612041005, 0970612041006,
0970612041007, 0970612041008, 0970612041009, 0970612041012, 0970612041014,
0970612041015, 0970612041016, 0970612041017, 0970612041020, 0970612041023,
0970612041027, 0970612041042, 0970612051000, 0970612051001, 0970612051002,
0970612051003, 0970612051004, 0970612051005, 0970612051006, 0970612051007,
0970612051008, 0970612051009, 0970612051010, 0970612051011, 0970612051012,
0970612051013, 0970612051014, 0970612051015, 0970612051016, 0970612051017,
0970612051018, 0970612051019, 0970612051022, 0970612051023, 0970612051024,
0970612051025, 0970612051026, 0970612051027, 0970612051028, 0970612051029,
0970612051030, 0970612051031, 0970612051032, 0970612051033, 0970612051034,
0970612052000, 0970612052002, 0970612052003, 0970612052004, 0970612052005,
0970612052006, 0970612052007, 0970612052008, 0970612052009, 0970612052010,
0970612052011, 0970612052012, 0970612052013, 0970612052014, 0970612053000,
0970612053001, 0970612053002, 0970612053003, 0970612053004, 0970612053005,
0970612053006, 0970612053007, 0970612053008, 0970612053009, 0970612053010,
0970612053011, 0970612053012, 0970612053013, 0970612053014, 0970612053015,
0970612053016, 0970612053017, 0970612053018, 0970612053019, 0970612053020,
0970612053021, 0970612053022, 0970612053023, 0970612053024, 0970612053025,
0970612053026, 0970612053027, 0970612053028, 0970612054000, 0970612054001,
0970612054002, 0970612054003, 0970612054004, 0970612054005, 0970612054006,
0970612054007, 0970612054008, 0970612054009, 0970612054010, 0970612054011,
0970612054012, 0970612054013, 0970612054014, 0970612054015, 0970612054016,
0970612054017, 0970612054018, 0970612054019, 0970612054020, 0970612054021,
0970612054022, 0970612054023, 0970612054024, 0970612054025, 0970612054026,
0970612054027, 0970612054028, 0970612054029, 0970612054030, 0970612054031,
0970612054032, 0970612054033, 0970612054034, 0970612054035, 0970612054036,
0970612054037, 0970612054038, 0970612054039, 0970612054040, 0970612054041,
0970612054042, 0970612054043, 0970612054044, 0970612054045, 0970612054046,
0970612054047, 0970612054048, 0970612054049, 0970612054050, 0970612054051,
0970612054052, 0970612054053, 0970612054054, 0970612054055, 0970612054056,
0970612054057, 0970612054058, 0970612054059, 0970612054060, 0970612054061,
0970612054062, 0970612054063, 0970612054064, 0970612054065, 0970612054066,
0970612054067, 0970612054068, 0970612054069, 0970612054070, 0970612054071,
0970612054072, 0970612054073, 0970612054074, 0970612054075, 0970612054076,
0970612054077, 0970612054078, 0970612054079, 0970612054080, 0970612054081,
0970612054082, 0970612054083, 0970612054084, 0970612054085, 0970612054086,
0970612054087, 0970612054088, 0970612054089, 0970612054090, 0970612054091;
Lincoln County, Polk County, Rutherford County.
District 11: Buncombe County: VTD 04.1, VTD 05.1, VTD 101.1, VTD 105.1, VTD 106.1,
VTD 107.1, VTD 13.1, VTD 14.2: Block(s) 0210011001023, 0210011001030,
0210011001036; VTD 15.1, VTD 24.1, VTD 26.1, VTD 30.1, VTD 31.1, VTD 41.1, VTD
44.1, VTD 45.1, VTD 46.1, VTD 47.1, VTD 48.1, VTD 49.1, VTD 50.1, VTD 52.1, VTD
Senate Bill 2

Session Law 2016-1

Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1-2 Filed 08/05/16 Page 8 of 10

Page 7

 General Assembly Of North Carolina

Extra Session 2016

53.1, VTD 58.1, VTD 59.1, VTD 63.1, VTD 67.1, VTD 68.1, VTD 69.1, VTD 70.1, VTD
71.1; Burke County, Caldwell County, Cherokee County, Clay County, Graham County,
Haywood County, Henderson County, Jackson County, Macon County, Madison County,
McDowell County, Mitchell County, Swain County, Transylvania County, Yancey County.
District 12: Mecklenburg County: VTD 002: Block(s) 1190024001000, 1190024001001,
1190024001002, 1190024001003, 1190024001004, 1190024001005, 1190024001006,
1190024001007, 1190024001009, 1190024001010, 1190024001011, 1190024001012,
1190024001013, 1190024001014, 1190024001015, 1190024001016, 1190024001017,
1190024001018, 1190024001019, 1190024002000, 1190024002001, 1190024002002,
1190024002003, 1190024002004, 1190024002005, 1190024002006, 1190024002007,
1190024002008, 1190024002009, 1190024002010, 1190024002011, 1190024002012,
1190024003000, 1190024003001, 1190024003002, 1190024003003, 1190024003004,
1190024003007, 1190024003008, 1190024003018, 1190025001013, 1190025001014,
1190025001015, 1190025001016, 1190025001017, 1190025001018, 1190025001019,
1190025001020, 1190025002027, 1190025002029, 1190025002030, 1190025002031,
1190025002032, 1190025002041, 1190025002042, 1190025002043, 1190026001000,
1190026001001, 1190026001006, 1190026001007, 1190026001008, 1190026001009,
1190026001010, 1190026001021, 1190026001022, 1190026001023, 1190026001024,
1190026001025, 1190026001026, 1190026001027, 1190026001028, 1190026001029,
1190026001030, 1190026001032; VTD 003, VTD 004, VTD 005, VTD 006, VTD 007,
VTD 009, VTD 010, VTD 011, VTD 012, VTD 013, VTD 014, VTD 015, VTD 016, VTD
017, VTD 020, VTD 021, VTD 022, VTD 023, VTD 024, VTD 025, VTD 026, VTD 027,
VTD 028, VTD 029, VTD 030, VTD 031, VTD 033, VTD 034, VTD 035, VTD 036, VTD
037, VTD 038, VTD 039, VTD 040, VTD 041, VTD 042, VTD 043, VTD 044, VTD 045,
VTD 046, VTD 047, VTD 049, VTD 050, VTD 051, VTD 052, VTD 053, VTD 054, VTD
055, VTD 056, VTD 058, VTD 059, VTD 060, VTD 061, VTD 062, VTD 063, VTD 064,
VTD 065, VTD 066, VTD 067, VTD 068, VTD 077, VTD 078.1, VTD 079, VTD 080,
VTD 081, VTD 082, VTD 083, VTD 084, VTD 085, VTD 087, VTD 088, VTD 089, VTD
094, VTD 095, VTD 097, VTD 098, VTD 099, VTD 102, VTD 104, VTD 105, VTD 106,
VTD 107.1, VTD 108, VTD 109, VTD 115, VTD 116, VTD 117, VTD 120, VTD 122,
VTD 123, VTD 124, VTD 125, VTD 126, VTD 127, VTD 128, VTD 129, VTD 130, VTD
132, VTD 133, VTD 134, VTD 135, VTD 138, VTD 140, VTD 141, VTD 142, VTD 143,
VTD 145, VTD 146, VTD 147, VTD 148, VTD 149, VTD 150, VTD 151, VTD 200, VTD
201, VTD 202, VTD 203, VTD 204.1, VTD 205, VTD 206, VTD 207, VTD 208, VTD 209,
VTD 210, VTD 211, VTD 212, VTD 213, VTD 214, VTD 222, VTD 223.1, VTD 224,
VTD 225, VTD 228, VTD 229, VTD 230, VTD 231, VTD 234, VTD 235, VTD 237, VTD
238.1, VTD 239, VTD 240, VTD 241, VTD 242, VTD 243.
District 13: Davidson County, Davie County, Guilford County: VTD FEN1, VTD FEN2, VTD
FR1, VTD FR2, VTD FR3, VTD FR4, VTD FR5, VTD G01, VTD G11, VTD G12, VTD
G13, VTD G14, VTD G15, VTD G16, VTD G17, VTD G18, VTD G19, VTD G20, VTD
G21, VTD G22, VTD G23, VTD G30, VTD G31, VTD G32, VTD G33, VTD G34, VTD
G35, VTD G36, VTD G37, VTD G38, VTD G39, VTD G40A1, VTD G40B, VTD G41,
VTD G42, VTD G43, VTD G44, VTD G45, VTD G46, VTD G47, VTD G48, VTD G49,
VTD G50, VTD G51, VTD G52, VTD G53, VTD G54, VTD G55, VTD G56, VTD G57,
VTD G58, VTD G59, VTD G60, VTD G61, VTD G62, VTD G63, VTD G64, VTD G65,
VTD G66, VTD G67, VTD G69, VTD G70, VTD G71: Block(s) 0810111012038; VTD
G73, VTD G74, VTD G75, VTD H01, VTD H02, VTD H03, VTD H04, VTD H05, VTD
H06, VTD H07, VTD H08, VTD H09, VTD H10, VTD H11, VTD H12, VTD H13, VTD
H14, VTD H15, VTD H16, VTD H17, VTD H18, VTD H19A, VTD H19B, VTD H20A,
VTD H20B, VTD H21, VTD H22, VTD H23, VTD H24, VTD H25, VTD H26, VTD H27,
VTD HP, VTD JAM1, VTD JAM2, VTD JAM3, VTD JAM4, VTD JAM5, VTD NCLAY1,
VTD NDRI, VTD PG1, VTD PG2, VTD SDRI, VTD SUM1, VTD SUM2, VTD SUM3,
VTD SUM4; Iredell County: VTD BA, VTD BE, VTD CC1, VTD CC2, VTD CC3, VTD
CC4, VTD CD, VTD CH-A, VTD CH-B, VTD CS, VTD DV1-A, VTD DV1-B, VTD
DV2-A, VTD DV2-B, VTD EM, VTD FT: Block(s) 0970612012021, 0970612012022,
0970612012023, 0970612012024, 0970612012025, 0970612012026, 0970612012027,
0970612012028, 0970612012029, 0970612012030, 0970612012031, 0970612013029,
0970612013030, 0970612013031, 0970612013032, 0970612013033, 0970612013034,
0970612013039, 0970612013040, 0970612013041, 0970612013042, 0970612021000,
Page 8

Session Law 2016-1
Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1-2 Filed 08/05/16 Page 9 of 10

Senate Bill 2

 General Assembly Of North Carolina

Extra Session 2016

0970612021001, 0970612021002, 0970612021003, 0970612021004, 0970612021005,
0970612021006, 0970612021007, 0970612021008, 0970612021009, 0970612021010,
0970612021011, 0970612021012, 0970612021013, 0970612021014, 0970612021017,
0970612021020, 0970612021021, 0970612021022, 0970612021023, 0970612021024,
0970612021025, 0970612021026, 0970612021027, 0970612021028, 0970612021029,
0970612021030, 0970612021031, 0970612021032, 0970612021033, 0970612021034,
0970612021035, 0970612021037, 0970612021038, 0970612021039, 0970612021040,
0970612021048, 0970612021049, 0970612022009, 0970612022010, 0970612022011,
0970612022012, 0970612022014, 0970612022015, 0970612022016, 0970612022017,
0970612022018, 0970612022019, 0970612022020, 0970612022021, 0970612022022,
0970612022023, 0970612022024, 0970612022025, 0970612022026, 0970612022027,
0970612022028, 0970612022029, 0970612022033, 0970612022036, 0970612022037,
0970612022038, 0970612022052, 0970612023000, 0970612023001, 0970612023002,
0970612023003, 0970612023004, 0970612023005, 0970612023006, 0970612023007,
0970612023008, 0970612023009, 0970612023010, 0970612023011, 0970612023016,
0970612023022, 0970612023023, 0970612023024, 0970612023025, 0970612023030,
0970612023031, 0970612023032, 0970612023033, 0970612023034, 0970612023035,
0970612023036, 0970612023037, 0970612023047, 0970612023048, 0970612023049,
0970612023053, 0970612031004, 0970612031005, 0970612031006, 0970612031013,
0970612031014, 0970612031015, 0970612052001, 0970612052015; VTD NH, VTD OL,
VTD SB, VTD SH-A, VTD SH-B, VTD ST1, VTD ST2, VTD ST3, VTD ST4, VTD ST5,
VTD ST6, VTD TB, VTD UG; Rowan County: VTD 07, VTD 11, VTD 12, VTD 21, VTD
24, VTD 27, VTD 28: Block(s) 1590505001000, 1590505001001, 1590505001004,
1590505001005, 1590505001007, 1590505001008, 1590505001037, 1590507003000,
1590507003009, 1590507003011, 1590507003023, 1590507003027, 1590507003028,
1590507003029, 1590507003031, 1590507003032, 1590507004000, 1590507004001,
1590507004002, 1590507004003, 1590507004004, 1590507004005, 1590507004007,
1590507004008, 1590507004009, 1590507004010, 1590507004011, 1590507004012,
1590507004013, 1590507004014, 1590507004015, 1590507004016, 1590507004017,
1590507004018, 1590507004024, 1590507004025, 1590507004026, 1590507004027,
1590507004028, 1590507004029, 1590507004030, 1590507004033, 1590507004034,
1590507004035, 1590507004036, 1590507004037, 1590507004038, 1590507004039,
1590507004040, 1590507004041, 1590507004042, 1590520002000; VTD 29, VTD 32,
VTD 34, VTD 35, VTD 36, VTD 38, VTD 39, VTD 40, VTD 41, VTD 42, VTD 45."
SECTION 2. The plan adopted by Section 1 of this act is effective for the elections
for the years 2016, 2018, and 2020 unless the United States Supreme Court reverses or stays
the decision of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
holding unconstitutional G.S. 163-201(a) as it existed prior to the enactment of this act (or the
decision is otherwise enjoined, made inoperable, or ineffective), and in any such case the prior
version of G.S. 163-201(a) is again effective.
SECTION 3. This act is effective when it becomes law.
In the General Assembly read three times and ratified this the 19th day of February,
2016.
s/ Tom Apodaca
Presiding Officer of the Senate
s/ Tim Moore
Speaker of the House of Representatives

Senate Bill 2

Session Law 2016-1

Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1-2 Filed 08/05/16 Page 10 of 10

Page 9

 CIVIL COVER SHEET

JS 44 (Rev. 0 /16)

The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as
provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the
purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)

I. (a) PLAINTIFFS

DEFENDANTS

COMMON CAUSE, et al.

ROBERT A. RUCHO, et al.

(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff

District of Columbia County

County of Residence of First Listed Defendant

(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)
NOTE:

(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number)

(IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF
THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.

Attorneys (If Known)

Edwin M. Speas, Jr. and Caroline P. Mackie. Poyner Spruill LLP,
P.O. Box 1801, Raleigh, NC 27602. (919) 783-6400
espeas@poynerspruill.com / cmackie@poynerspruill.com

II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only)
u 1

U.S. Government
Plaintiff

u 3

Federal Question
(U.S. Government Not a Party)

u 2

U.S. Government
Defendant

u 4

Diversity
(Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)

III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff
(For Diversity Cases Only)
PTF
Citizen of This State
u 1

DEF
u 1

and One Box for Defendant)
PTF
DEF
Incorporated or Principal Place
u 4
u 4
of Business In This State

Citizen of Another State

u 2

u

2

Incorporated and Principal Place
of Business In Another State

u 5

u 5

Citizen or Subject of a
Foreign Country

u 3

u

3

Foreign Nation

u 6

u 6

IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an “X” in One Box Only)
CONTRACT
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u
u
u
u
u

TORTS

110 Insurance
120 Marine
130 Miller Act
140 Negotiable Instrument
150 Recovery of Overpayment
& Enforcement of Judgment
151 Medicare Act
152 Recovery of Defaulted
Student Loans
(Excludes Veterans)
153 Recovery of Overpayment
of Veteran’s Benefits
160 Stockholders’ Suits
190 Other Contract
195 Contract Product Liability
196 Franchise

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u
u
u
u
u
u

REAL PROPERTY
210 Land Condemnation
220 Foreclosure
230 Rent Lease & Ejectment
240 Torts to Land
245 Tort Product Liability
290 All Other Real Property

u
u
u
u
u
u
u

PERSONAL INJURY
310 Airplane
315 Airplane Product
Liability
320 Assault, Libel &
Slander
330 Federal Employers’
Liability
340 Marine
345 Marine Product
Liability
350 Motor Vehicle
355 Motor Vehicle
Product Liability
360 Other Personal
Injury
362 Personal Injury Medical Malpractice
CIVIL RIGHTS
440 Other Civil Rights
441 Voting
442 Employment
443 Housing/
Accommodations
445 Amer. w/Disabilities Employment
446 Amer. w/Disabilities Other
448 Education

FORFEITURE/PENALTY

PERSONAL INJURY
u 365 Personal Injury Product Liability
u 367 Health Care/
Pharmaceutical
Personal Injury
Product Liability
u 368 Asbestos Personal
Injury Product
Liability
PERSONAL PROPERTY
u 370 Other Fraud
u 371 Truth in Lending
u 380 Other Personal
Property Damage
u 385 Property Damage
Product Liability
PRISONER PETITIONS
Habeas Corpus:
u 463 Alien Detainee
u 510 Motions to Vacate
Sentence
u 530 General
u 535 Death Penalty
Other:
u 540 Mandamus & Other
u 550 Civil Rights
u 555 Prison Condition
u 560 Civil Detainee Conditions of
Confinement

u 625 Drug Related Seizure
of Property 21 USC 881
u 690 Other

BANKRUPTCY
u 422 Appeal 28 USC 158
u 423 Withdrawal
28 USC 157
PROPERTY RIGHTS
u 820 Copyrights
u 830 Patent
u 840 Trademark

LABOR
u 710 Fair Labor Standards
Act
u 720 Labor/Management
Relations
u 740 Railway Labor Act
u 751 Family and Medical
Leave Act
u 790 Other Labor Litigation
u 791 Employee Retirement
Income Security Act

u
u
u
u
u

SOCIAL SECURITY
861 HIA (1395ff)
862 Black Lung (923)
863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
864 SSID Title XVI
865 RSI (405(g))

FEDERAL TAX SUITS
u 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff
or Defendant)
u 871 IRS—Third Party
26 USC 7609

IMMIGRATION
u 462 Naturalization Application
u 465 Other Immigration
Actions

OTHER STATUTES
u 375 False Claims Act
u 376 Qui Tam (31 USC
3729(a))
u 400 State Reapportionment
u 410 Antitrust
u 430 Banks and Banking
u 450 Commerce
u 460 Deportation
u 470 Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organizations
u 480 Consumer Credit
u 490 Cable/Sat TV
u 850 Securities/Commodities/
Exchange
u 890 Other Statutory Actions
u 891 Agricultural Acts
u 893 Environmental Matters
u 895 Freedom of Information
Act
u 896 Arbitration
u 899 Administrative Procedure
Act/Review or Appeal of
Agency Decision
u 950 Constitutionality of
State Statutes

V. ORIGIN (Place an “X” in One Box Only)
u 1 Original
Proceeding

u 2 Removed from
State Court

u 3

u 6 Multidistrict
Litigation Transfer
(specify)
Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity):
Remanded from
Appellate Court

u 4 Reinstated or
Reopened

u 5 Transferred from
Another District

u 8 Multidistrict
Litigation  Direct File

42 U.S.C. § 1983

VI. CAUSE OF ACTION Brief description of cause:

Plaintiffs seek a declaration that certain congressional districts are unconstitutional, and further relief.

u CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION
VII. REQUESTED IN
UNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P.
COMPLAINT:
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)
(See instructions):
IF ANY
JUDGE
DATE

CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint:
u Yes
u No
JURY DEMAND:

DEMAND $

DOCKET NUMBER

SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

/s/ Edwin M. Speas, Jr.

08/05/2016
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
RECEIPT #

AMOUNT

APPLYING IFP

JUDGE

MAG. JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1-3 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 2

 JS 44 Reverse (Rev. 0 /16)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44
Authority For Civil Cover Sheet
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as
required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is
required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk of
Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows:
I.(a)

(b)

(c)

Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use
only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and
then the official, giving both name and title.
County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the
time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land
condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.)
Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting
in this section "(see attachment)".

II.

Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X"
in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below.
United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here.
United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box.
Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment
to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes
precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked.
Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the
citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity
cases.)

III.

Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this
section for each principal party.

IV.

Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If the nature of suit cannot be determined, be sure the cause of action, in Section VI below, is
sufficient to enable the deputy clerk or the statistical clerk(s) in the Administrative Office to determine the nature of suit. If the cause fits more than
one nature of suit, select the most definitive.

V.

Origin. Place an "X" in one of the seven boxes.
Original Proceedings. (1) Cases which originate in the United States district courts.
Removed from State Court. (2) Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1441.
When the petition for removal is granted, check this box.
Remanded from Appellate Court. (3) Check this box for cases remanded to the district court for further action. Use the date of remand as the filing
date.
Reinstated or Reopened. (4) Check this box for cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the filing date.
Transferred from Another District. (5) For cases transferred under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). Do not use this for within district transfers or
multidistrict litigation transfers.
Multidistrict Litigation – Transfer. (6) Check this box when a multidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 28 U.S.C.
Section 1407.
Multidistrict Litigation – Direct File. (8) Check this box when a multidistrict case is filed in the same district as the Master MDL docket.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS NOT AN ORIGIN CODE 7. Origin Code 7 was used for historical records and is no longer relevant due to
changes in statue.

VI.

Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional
statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service

VII.

Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.
Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction.
Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.

VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket
numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases.
Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.

Case 1:16-cv-01026 Document 1-3 Filed 08/05/16 Page 2 of 2