2:14-cr-20048-CSB # 89 Page 1 of 6 E-FILED Monday, 09 March, 2015 03:12:17 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN W. DAVIS, f.k.a. JOHN DOE #1 ANDREW D. HOFF, f.k.a. JOHN DOE #2 DAVID DELALIO, f.k.a. JOHN DOE #3 JASON T. GMOSER, f.k.a. JOHN DOE #4, and DAKOTA K. MARTIN f.k.a. JOHN DOE #5, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 14-CR-20048 THE GOVERNMENT’S EX PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND SEALING AND REDACTION ORDER The United States of America, by and through its attorneys, James A. Lewis, United States Attorney for the Central District of Illinois, Assistant United States Attorney Elly M. Peirson, and Trial Attorney, Keith A. Becker, moves this Court to extend its order redacting the defendant’s user names and details of the investigation 2:14-cr-20048-CSB # 89 Page 2 of 6 from public documents in the case for an additional 90 days. In support thereof, the government states the following: 1. On October 10, 2014, this Court granted the government’s Motion to Redact User Names and Details of the Investigation from public court documents. (R. 32). The Court ordered that said documents were to remain under seal for a period of 30 days. On November 12, 2014, the Court extended that order for 30 additional days. On December 8, 2014, the Court again extended that order for 90 additional days. 2. The government initially argued that not all of the defendants were identified and apprehended, therefore there existed a great risk that disclosure of this information would impair the ongoing investigation, increase the risk of flight of the unidentified defendants and obstruct justice. The government subsequently worked diligently to identify the other defendants and has now identified and arrested all five currently charged defendants. All of those defendants have been provided, through counsel, complete and un-redacted copies of the Indictments in this case. 3. The defendants are charged with being members and administrators of a particular child pornography website. Although at this time, the website is no longer operating, investigation into numerous other users of that website remains ongoing. 4. In its previous extension request, the government advised the Court that new information had recently become available that may assist in the identification of further users of the website. That information includes identifying IP address information regarding more than 30 registered users of the website. The information 2 2:14-cr-20048-CSB # 89 Page 3 of 6 was provided to the FBI by a foreign law enforcement agency. That sort of IP address information is particularly crucial in the context of this website, because the website operated on the anonymous Tor computer network, which masks the true IP addresses of its users. All of those users are currently under investigation for producing, distributing, receiving and accessing child pornography through this website. Information about those more than 30 users has been distributed by the FBI to field offices throughout the United States. Enforcement efforts remain ongoing in order to identify and apprehend those subjects. In addition, agents have utilized the user name of one the defendants in an undercover capacity. Revealing the user name in these sealed documents will compromise the integrity on that ongoing investigation. 5. For example, on February 4, 2015, law enforcement agents conducted a search at a residence in the State of Texas based upon this information. A subject was identified at the address and law enforcement obtained information tying that subject to the production of child pornography involving three separate victims, including the sexual abuse of a toddler-aged child. The subject was subsequently Indicted on federal charges including production and possession of child pornography. 6. Courts are authorized to seal court documents, upon a proper showing. In re: Eye Care Physicians, 100 F.3d 514, 518, 519 (7th Cir. 1996) (court need not disclose search warrant affidavits when such disclosure might “impair the ongoing criminal investigation”). Revealing the usernames of the charged defendants and details about the website in question in public court documents, particularly in consideration of the 3 2:14-cr-20048-CSB # 89 Page 4 of 6 defendants’ roles as administrators of the website, poses a substantial risk to jeopardize the investigation into other users. The defendants’ usernames would be immediately recognizable to any users of the website in question, who would immediately be aware that those users had been identified and arrested. This may cause other users under investigation to notify other users, destroy evidence, and take further steps to conceal their identities and evidence of their crimes. This concern is heightened because of the presence of multiple administrative-level users together in this Indictment, which inand-of-itself suggests that law enforcement successfully infiltrated the website. Further, users of the website have innumerable other ways to communicate with one another, through the open Internet or the anonymous Tor network. There remain websites on the Tor network dedicated to pedophilia and child pornography which are frequented by users such as those under investigation. Such users could easily post information about law enforcement’s infiltration of the website anonymously on or through the Tor network. Accordingly, a single user could be able to successfully notify thousands of fellow site users of the defendants’ arrests with a single communication. 7. Users of illegal child pornography websites such as the site involved in this case are extremely sensitive to law enforcement infiltration. The undersigned represents the government in another prosecution involving users of a child pornography website where, upon the release of a search warrant affidavit which contained details about the website (but did not name the site) and publication of a news article describing the investigation, Internet users of a website dedicated to the 4 2:14-cr-20048-CSB # 89 Page 5 of 6 discussion and promotion of pedophilia started a discussion thread in which they correctly identified the name of the website and sought advice regarding actions they should take to avoid detection or destroy evidence. For example, one user identified himself as a member of the website and asked “what sort of danger am I in? Should I start smashing hard drives?” WHEREFORE, the United States of America requests that this Court enter an order extending its previous order redacting the defendant’s user names and details of the investigation from public documents in the above-captioned case for an additional 90 days. Respectfully submitted, By: JAMES A. LEWIS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY s/Keith A. Becker KEITH A. BECKER, NY Bar No. 4287967 Trial Attorney Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section Department of Justice, Criminal Division 1400 New York Ave. NW, 6th Floor Washington, DC 20530 (202) 305-4104 (office) keith.becker@usdoj.gov s/Elly M. Peirson Elly M. Peirson, IL Bar No. 6298075 Assistant United States Attorney 201 S. Vine Street, Suite 226 Urbana, Illinois 61802 Telephone: (217) 373-5875 elly.peirson@usdoj.gov 5 2:14-cr-20048-CSB # 89 Page 6 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 9, 2014, I electronically filed a notice of the foregoing ex parte motion, along with a redacted version of this document, with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: Jon Gray Noll Noll Law Office, LLC 930 E. Monroe St. Springfield, IL 62701 noll@noll-law.com Mark Wykoff Wykoff Law Office, LLC 919 South Eight Street Springfield, IL 62703 mark@wykofflaw.com Scott J. Frankel FRANKEL & COHEN Suite 1615 53 W. Jackson Chicago, IL 60604 scottfrankel@aol.com Bradley M. Kraemer, Esq. Caparella-Kraemer & Associates,LLC 4841-A Rialto Road West Chester, Ohio 45069 Bradley@Caparellakraemer.com Elisabeth Pollock Assistant Federal Defender 300 W. Main St. Urbana, IL 61802 Elisabeth_Pollock@fd.org, s/Keith A. Becker KEITH A. BECKER, NY Bar No. 4287967 Trial Attorney Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section Department of Justice, Criminal Division 1400 New York Ave. NW, 6th Floor Washington, DC 20530 (202) 305-4104 (office) keith.becker@usdoj.gov 6