Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 2036 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 No. C 10-03561 WHA Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., ORDER RE FOLLOW UP FROM HEARING ON AUGUST 17, 2016 Defendant. / By THURSDAY AUGUST 25, AT NOON, Christa Anderson, counsel for Google, shall 17 submit a sworn statement explaining why the discovery responses referenced in Court yesterday 18 were not updated, including the full extent to which counsel knew Google’s intention to launch 19 a full version of Marshmallow, including the Google Play Store, for Chrome OS. 20 By the same date and time, Annette Hurst, counsel for Oracle, shall submit a sworn 21 statement setting forth, after full inquiry, the full extent to which Oracle neglected to update its 22 discovery responses by reason, in whole or in part, of one or more rulings by the judge. The 23 same statement shall explain why counsel repeatedly represented that the Jones v. Aero/chem 24 decision required an “evidentiary hearing” when that decision, as it turns out, made no mention 25 of an “evidentiary hearing” and instead remanded because no “hearing” or other consideration 26 at all had been given to the issue of discovery conduct by the district judge. 27 28 By the same date, counsel shall meet and confer and advise the Court whether the form of judgment should be amended to reflect that it is not a final judgment but a Rule 52(c) Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 2036 Filed 08/18/16 Page 2 of 2 1 judgment on partial findings, given that Oracle is entitled to challenge further uses of Android 2 herein. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: August 18, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2