memom --
No Contact

current. 00-- Thu, Dec 17, 2015 .l 1 pm
To: 'Fanm Danial' _nohmond,odu>

Dean Fabianr

When the no oontact order was Initially issued. I was told that it included him leaving any place that I am. Maura told me
that oenein places are 'blg enough.' like Robins Stadium. lhat we would bolh be allowed to be there, Tuesday ni?ll was
at the and looked up lrom the treadmill I was at (one olthe ones lacing the tram door in front at the shit-masters) up
see him at the Even though I was in the middle ol a workout and had plans to continue my workout upstairs. I lert
because of him. Is the Weinslein Center "big enough.' so that we can both be there, even though seeing him tor that brie!
moment not only made me panic, but vividly brought what happened that night bear to the lorerrontol my memory, I also
ten into h'm Saturday night and had the same response and. again. I was the one who Iert the looahon, I understand it the
school mn't 'protect' me lrorn him when I'm downtown, away train the university, but I think the only place 'big enough"
on our campus the same plaoe is Robins Stadium and. luckily, I have no desire to go to his games
and support him or his team. On September 29when I mind my midterm because I saw him and had a panic atladt,
Maura told me to Neel luayf Ihal I had only seen him oil/around campus I law tines since Ihel night. but I don't Neel
lucky," that I have 'onry' seen my rapist at school a 'Iew times" because I'd rally rather not have to worry about seeing
him wherever I we just like I'd really wished he'd stoop" when I first asked him to imtead hlm. as I person'
thinking he could keep going for 'a law more minutes.' a lie was going to finish soon

So. from the Title IX perspective. where on this canvas is 'big enough.' to let us both be there. so I know when never to
be. And where on this campus is not 'blg enouyl.' so that he should have to leave ill am there, is it him. seeing me
somewhere, and knowing he has to leave and making the decision to leave or am I supposed to someone to enloroe
it because he can claim (like I'm sure he'll claim about the it you ask him). that he didn't see me or he smelly wasn't
there and i made it up.

Vou're more than weloome to remind him at the no contact order, but he'll say he hasn't violated 'rL Just like he 'didn't
Violate it.' when he, ll'l his own words, 'unknowingty.' texted me ertler leevmg your ethoe that day, alter you not only 
ntailed him about it. but also gave him a verbal reminder (still unsure how you can "unknowan unblodt someone's
number, open up your messaging app, type in my name. and send TWO mesages). 'Faoe--tolaee" oontaot doesn't need
to mean that he came up to me and had a oonversation with ma, bemuss I was told that it memt him leaving a location if
I were there, so that is what needs to be upheld. I am not  to make this dificult, but his continued presence at
Richmond has impacted my education this semester and, looking towards whether I will continue my
education at Richmond next semester. this is something that needs to be addressed now,

Please clarity with him that It he sees me somewhere he needs to leave and he "doesnt see me,' Hid see him. that I'll
be contacting URPD to remove him from the location.

Thank you.
CC