l4




I









- 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Emmi-aim 
{B?w?gm??dj?a? 32 {$333 @?mwi?gg; ?m'??mwm?m Eigemiw ?w?m?ga - . 
Nat au'tmmia?faa?y ?dgtiami?w - ?sra ?agmmm}? 
magi? 

 

 

PHOJECTS

oF
AS

TIUS HEPORT HAS B

~

.UV~'Jl~~

Director, Operations

THE

oF

TACTICA

3 1

AUGUST

N

 TIUS IvON1HLY ACTIVITIES REPORT REPLECfS THE CURRENT STA11JS OF
USAFTAWC.

IT OUrLlNES TIlE BACKGROUND OF EACH PROJECT, PROVIDES A BRIEF

TESTED, AND PRESENTS TIlE PROGRESS TO DATE.

THE BODY OF THE MONTIILY ACfIVITIES REPORT IS DIVIDED INTO
OF OFFICIAL NlMBERED TAC TESTS.

~'ECfION

II CONTAINS TEST CENTER

""'-IA',,"',,"

EFFORTS AND JOINT TEST PARTICIPATION mAT DOES N<.1f FALL UNDER SECTION I OR PURE

IS COMPRISED OF

SELF-GEf\1El~ATED

IT IS HOPED WAT 11-IE USAFfAWC MON'nn;y
HOWEVER~

ECHELONS OF CQVIMANDS OR

REPORT ll/lEIlTS

IN ORDER TO ENABLE TIUS IEAlJOHJ\RTER.C;; TO PROVIDE ALL ADDRESSEES

AlIJD CONSTRUCI'IVE CQ\MENTS ARE INVITED AND MAY BE ADDRESSED TO USAFfAWC

OF

 PRO..JECT TITLE

TABLE OF ,-""nT.:;"-'·"
SECTIOr. _

TAe TESTS

Wild Weasel IV-C
Wild Weasel IV··D
SEE-SAMS F~105 Installation (QRC-3l7)
EB-66 Modification OT&E
EB··66 MOD 1903
.
APR-·25/26 Modification/SPOT SAM/RECO Jammer
F-4D/APR-25/26
Compass Strike (QRC-334) V

7

RIVET TOP
Tactical Application of LORAN C/D (Joint)
AN/TRC-97A Category III Test
Inverse Mode TACAN System
Digital Message Entry System (DMES) Operational Evaluation
Tactical Satellite Communication Program (TSCP)

10

Test

SHED LIGHT
YAS~2D/AS-2D

Self-Contained Night Attack
Tropic Moon II Quick Look Continuation
Tropic Moon IIA
Gun Ship II

Dancing Falcon
Dancing Sparrow
Combat Lady
OT&E CS-l Filled BLU-52/B
IWi Phase A
ii

 II

TUSTS
, 60-Kl'i

USAFl'AWC Exploratory Test (Rotary Combustion

SECTION II I
A.\lD JOINT TEST

SUPPORT TEST

TAl\C MONITORED
LORAN D (Joint Test)

Forward Air Control Post Cat II (.Joint)
Forward Air Control Post Category III
Test of Two Lightweight Tropo Radio Sets
LIEP - Loran Integrated Equipment for Tactical
JVlonitoring RC1D J\nti-SAMProjec.ts
Giant Stride IV
llriteye Hare [\I1U-32/B and Launcher LAU-55A
Flare l\ILU-4411 awl Dispenser LAU-62/ A
Thunder Stick II
Cargo Aircraft Launcher (C-130) :V1K-24
Black Spot.,
Lonesome Tiger (FLIR 1)

..
TESTS

P-lllA ECM & RliAl\' Capability

SPECIAL PROJECTS

Active ECM for Fighter Aircraft

Dukes Mare

PROPOSED 11;STS

BIAS. Ilunter (llunter 1)
Night Rider
LOHII."J IntegTation Equipment fo:r Tactical Air Wnrfare

11

  

A



. 

 

 

 

SEETXQN 3




 

?nr
ar"
3- .


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



. - 

 

MOMTHl Y STATUS REPORT

IV-C

(S) 1~ Wild Weasel IV-C aircraft were reconfigured at McDonnell
Co, Witil an
Tape Recorder. This equipment is. located in tile left forward .,... "'''''...'''...., well of the F-4C
serve as the prototype for tile Wild Weasel rv~c to be procured
fiscal
67. The oro

be absorbed in the modification line at a later date.

PROGRESS

One aircraft was assigned to Eglin APE for ar&li~ and the otiler to
APE for vibration
Equipment performance was satisfactory. A TWX
rt
07370
was ~JL:"P""\""'!!I:lU
Eglin AFB for 3 to 4 weeks to test modifications made to tile
(5)

14 sorties.

 MONnu. Y STATUS REPORT

PFH)JECT DESCRIPTION

lS)

WHd

Wea~el

IV D

been modified with the
Thtt Wild Wea~,el IVD ancraft will be
containmg the KA 71A camera and the
the F· 4D configured weapon
PH-OGRESS

(8) From initial
cOllective action
to McDonnell for

the feasibility of
APGC will Stlppm:t

"'4'l.UIJPC;U

 is in response to a CSAP directlve to conduct
in F·IOSF aHcrafL TIle AFSC
eVclluiltlon was
with APGC FlOOF results checks
with other F 105F
Weasel program An
to include
'-.<.\.. ''''''''"'''''

spar

SMt

at Eglm AFB. Fla. began on 24
training radars;

phase SEESAMS test objectives were

and result:::.

SAM modification was not evaluated because it dId not ftmction

equipped F·IOSF aircraft are in SEA and

"'r'eport is in preparation,

use ,.;ill be

 TAe Test 66110
PROJECT MANAGEfl/SYM80L/PHONE NO

-.IAC!lAWC/AfJ.GC/.3~TI"l\f_.

___ _

PRIORITY

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

An Or&B of the modiflC<ltion was conducted by TAWC
ain:;ra±t elet.txomc
Test objectIves Wlne
and warnmg
; (2) to·' de'cermine
,
to determIne the
to ,conhrm the operatlOn of
of the EB66C, dummy QRC ·160 pods
PROGRESS

(S) Physical
FfE 08670, dated 10
operationally

of the EB·66C modifications
66, The final
as installed"
jammers ca~~ed some interference with the
slgnal detection, The QRC"160
WC'1ce not

Physical
of the EB··66 Mods was
25 May 67. The
report is bemg
reception and warning was good. however,
receiver) displayed the threat radar "''''~;'''''J'''
usable; APR·26 missile launch warningwas still
jarrmrers were active could be attenuated 50 that
systems were
wi th the APR .. 25/26, and the

 TAe Test 67 106

1903

PROJECT MANAGER/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

3S96
TEST l.OCATION(S)

Fla.
PART ICIPA T ING/COOFlD AGENCYIS)

:.,63TRW

a~------,··~----·~------·'--··---··--··-··-··

TAe IB
PHOJECT DEscnlPTION

TIle RB 66B W1.1
modd u>,llOn

and the ALR 20

Pf'QGRESS

testing

Some ot the
effective

P·4D

 PROJ EeT OESCRIPT ION

PR9GRESS

(S) The APR 25;26 ITIodlilcatlOns fmd SPOT SAM test has been
was establi5hcd but tunctionmg problems
an
flight because ot overheating, Test items were returned
been resolved and an Eep is bC)1ng subml Hod to WRM1A

(5) CSAP (5) AFSPJ':QE 81760, 2 Aug 67,
• Cmnbat
provide mini jammers fOT F 4C/D, RF-4C,
and
QRC 373 1, 8 lV~lz unit1 373'2, 100 ~IHz umt; 373 3, 150160 iv!Hz unit;
800-900 NIHz will be initiated by
AFSC :is
participation,
c

c

 NUMBERIS)

TAe Test 6 26
PRO] ECT MAN.~GER!SYM80U PHON E NO

f}.LthllL:L_Qk~n .. _Capl~_11.sl.\ElnSU8B~3 59} .
TEST LOCATION(S)

.~gJj.J:LM:1i,,_J:lQXjgL. ___ _
PARTICIPATING/COORO AGENCYIS)

_TA~Jd.N?.GiL~Itw._
PRIORITY

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

(5) This Joint TAWC/APCC test
productive sorties are
will also be tested

evaluate APR 25/26
with a
<lucraft

WIll

PROGRESS

(S) The test F·4D \lfith t'le APR·2S/26 system installed arrived at
were excellentc No EMI was experienced. 'flU;) only
which were not catised by the installation,
aircraft will be delivered in early -;""n'!",'mt,py

2S

 fAC TeH 6'1 21
PROJECT MAN,AGER/SYM80L,'PHONE NO

Iv

205S

PR9JECT OFFICER / 0RGAN/SYM80L/PHONE NO

Leon W MK!';,

Lt Col

USAf/mit/SS? 20S

TAC lC
PROJECT DESCFUPTION

am has been dl reeted
CSAf;
Three
test
by MSC) \.,,1 tl1 TAe pro,
env ironmental and
<:onducted by the
at
AFB, \>lIth
wnducted by PAGA} WIth aSsIstance trom

--------".-'-_....

---'"-.-."----"-,-,-.~.,----.-----,.-

PROGRESS

(8)

Three TAC F 4D aircraft

1967"

The TAWC received a

information is being obtained
A,

13,
C,

Dec 67

Aircraft
GTound~

RFI and Environmental test

ZI Flight Test

D, SPJ\ Operational Evaluation
A joint ASD/APGC/TAWC meeting was conducted

Dec 6'1
Dec 67
~lar

Feb 68

68

the week of 28

  

 

 

 

 

 

{30

(3%me

 

 

 

 

NUMBER(SI

TAC Test No,

(C)

66~183

Phase T completed 10 July 1967.
Advance party and RIVET TOP aircraft deployed on 24
1967 ~
Main body of deployment force in place on 9 Aug 1967"
Phase II began on 9 Aug 1967,
System checkout flight 15 August 1967; aircraft went NORS-G for
actuator
ETIC 1 September 1967
Supply problems are being encountered; action is being taken to alleviate

 MOI''niil Y SI ATUS REPORT

NUMBER(S)

TAC Te~~

m-Jooi

UNCLA..SSIFlED

,-~~,----__------~--~~-c--~·-------~------~~·-~--~:~~,~~~~·~-~~~~.
APGc
1TITLE ,--------------CONCEPT
_liBlAYL
Tactical Ap~ic~~_~?2'=-of L~~__ ~LD_~oint) (U) ________.___ 'br.~eCroOl'lDd'uCclti:edcttEo~d"et1t~ea:lal:'rl~Sil~i'

PROJECT MANAGER/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

Robert F, Arndt

_

882~4661

PROJECT OFFICER/ORGAN/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

Robert F, Arndt, Major, USAF, TAWC (OCT), 882.,4661

""

UI

LU

'-'

ANjARN-85 LOHAN receiver system would meet
-.~.---.~--.-.--, Anny and the Air Force for a high
TAC was directed to support the test in
tactics which would be used in fulfil
mission ..

~;!~:~~:~~-~:~~CY(S)---------~=~-~=~~-==-~---=:~ lt7}G!~i;T~J~~:~~~~Lr D~;f.
US ArnIy_,_J1q _~as!_~'::l.il_:::!.~_:APGC, TAIVC
Trxm

__:~~~~~i~~~lJl\~_]~__________ :-::-__ -]~~;-~~~:~()~?]~~;~~~~:EST~-PROJECT DESCRIPTI9N

The tactical deployment of llIunitions, persormel, and supplies IS 1
re')tricted to VFR conditions
mission, The precise positIOning capabillty which is available through LORAN C or D should enhance the
permit 24 hour, all weather operations
the AN/ARN 85 15 compatible to both the LORAN C and j) environments.
reconnaIssance; i.nterdiction, tactica.l airllft, lose au support and rendezvous
tactics
The test
Egl m ranges and will be under the operatlOnal control of the APGC lDHAN j)Joint
The
85
and 1S mounted on Rl3 66, F4C, and C130 test.becl aircraft
PROGRESS

The test order \vas dis tributed on 23 ~larch 1967, Personnel outl incd in the test order
armex to the test order, oil specific operational tactics; The test plan
A) was
tests started 15 May 1967, C47 accuracy tests have been completed. The F4C is
problems grounded the aircraft for three weeks
The C 130 is currently
modified to
The C.,130 modificatIOn will be completed on 8 Sep 67 fot continuation of accuracy tests,
<{rerational tests as outlined in TAC Test 67,300 were started on 14 July 1967 for the F
Hans are being conducted concurrently with the engineering tests, The tri-·senilee test
eliminate, certain portions of the operational testso The reviewed test plan will be
of TAC Test 67-300.,

"

..,. . ~

 MONTHI.. Y S'T ATUS

PROJECT MANAGER/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

_. Jol~b McCraD-i~Ca~llin)·~rDCL) g82~4673
PROJECT OFFICER/ORGAN/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

PROJECT DESCHIPTION

The operational mission of the TACS is to provide the
commander of the 1\1 r Force componeni: of a Joint Task Foret' exerci.ses
communications lmks between elenients of the TACS, It \ViI be ,m""'''ri~'
Support Squadrons, and Direct Air Support Flights of TAC, PACAF)
II test objectIVes wi 11 be further refined or verified in the
CAT III test objectives
detennine the effectiveness of
to
maintain
the
--_......
- ....__. .-----_._....__."---'-----'------_.•._--_.._..

PROGRESS

L Testing of the AN/fRC,97A is complete and distribution has been made of the
and reportec.l on in the final report are now accomplished. These
are
mental control and (2) Detel1l1ine the effectiveness of the Air
Command
not indicate that air conditioning units are
for
The evaluation of
and maintain the AN/TRC,,97A after brief OJ'!' in
field,

2,

The final report revealed the following general conclusions:
a,

It is compatible with the existing equipment with '<lhich it must interface.

b,

Si ting is very eri tical in the tropo mode

C,

Anchor stakes provided for the parabolic antennas are

do The AN/TRC~97A radio set will operate for
maintenance is perfonned, sufficient spares and test

must close

 MONTHL Y STATUS REPORT

9AF

TALC

PRIORITy

-

lAC 113; APGC IT4
~-

.......

~~-~

~.-

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The purpose of the test is to conduct an
lonal evaluation
llaingational informatIon between lmits (grounll or anborne)
cmtcrma and IIblack box". The syste!;l ",Hl provide
aHcraft; (3) Stnkc illrCTaft ar~d ground FAe, (4)
C6)
Inbound al rcraft and "bare base" lanclwg facH \ ties
electronic measurements wil1 be made to meaSllre
PROGRESS

The projPct \lias originated by a 1559 fund
from TAWC to '['I\C
a letter contract was completed \'1ith tJlC contractor m December t96i).
A coordinahon meeting to discllss and prepare
48 ARRS., Engineering drawings have been
has assigned a priority of lT4 and
A C 130 has been assigJied from 48ARHS resources.
have been performed and the moLlification
during week of 11 Sep 67

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

 ----_.
\.

__~aj Ko_S.=.-Jll':!!-ds -' USAFT~f_W.fbl_§!i.~:±2.?l __________
TEST LOCATION(S)

___~gl in/SEA

. __j.________ ._ ...
ASSIGNED DATE

_________________. _ _ _ _ ___ .__l1!'l:E<::l.l

PARTICIPATING/COORD AGENCYIS)

TAC

._.__ ....L.._-'-____..

INITIATOR

TAWC

'rAe
.----.---------.

-_ _._--_ _
...

.. ..---_ ..

TAC 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The DMES will be employed in the air request net of
jt in conjunction Ivi th W~ Army fielJ exercise
j.\
be provided to each FAC and ALO
A tel111inal for
be encoded and transilll tted through the Air Reques t Ne t .
ARN, The combat effectiveness of the system will be
tional area with an Anny division \1here further

exercise.
be conducted

PROGRESS

'f

1

Phase T coordmabon plmming originaHy scheduled for June 1967 will be Jel
designate the Anny division required for the opera! ionai test. Choice of the
then'Jfore the Test Director for the test

E

A. meeting of TAe, TAWC, RADC, AFLC and contractor

I)

for the test~ Discussion revealed that the test
longer deploying, At the 67 July Pentagon
the equipment (46 UvlEDs and 14 T~nllinals) will
January, February and March; deployment of the

7AF has requested that the contractor (Litton) bring DlvlES

to SEA for d[-cmonstration

to include TAWC participation in the visit,

A TAWC team will
visit PACAFHq on

5 Septembe:r67 for Hq 7AF,
:return hip to brief on results

UNCLASSIf:lfED

 :-fTITLE Tactical sa. tellite conmllUll.: cation Program (.1'.S.'CP)
TAe 67-302_____'_.___~ ____,_Operat;i9J2Cl,1 Fea::;ibility_lE);1LJlJ1________,__

NUMBERISI.

effort, Electronic
for conducting
Edwin D, Lewel1yn,~,<!R!ain,,_USAF. Q9~882c-46bL_. ____________________,____ The complete testing is set
PROJECT OFFICER/ORGAN/SYMBOL/PHONE NO
Operational Feasibility Tes
_Edwin D, Lewell~Jl!.a:iJl->- USA~\1SAFfAWC(DCTJ-,-'§'§'?'·!l:iiJJ1 __-,-____________
____ publishea by ESDTACSAICOll;!
TEST LOCATIONISI Egl~n AFE, Bergstrom AFh, Shaw AFB,
fASSIGNED DATE J:ST COMPL OAn'
tio.nal tests will beconduct~>cl.
Pope
MacDlll AFl3
_______ 2_0J~E.cl~tJ?_, :3.9J2!~Ei~_~!~_,tJ.:?_ . eadl user conmtand, Tests will determine
PART~CIPAT~NG/COOR_D A_GENCYI~I,
,
IN~TIATOR
I
access satellite using UHF and SHF to

PROJ ECT MANAGER/SYMBOL/ PHON E NO

I

o~l~gL rAC , l2AtLJAtL rAw~-·--TEs TfiEPORT-oATE-J·PHAS-EO-F'T¥S~¥NG_Unass igI!~Q__ ____________ ~___ LtJ.Qvel1l\~L~~bQ XlilllIl:iDK________

PR I

-------·--1 llS er

requirements,

_ _ . 1 _______ _

(S) The TACSKfCOM tests will involve networks of airborne anu ground terminals
been previously checked out in tests using LES 5 and LES (j satellites" TAC Test 67 30,2 1;1111 detennine the
Tactical Air Control System, Satellite cOllUlIunicat ions will be employeci in six primary nets' Ihrect Air
to TACP ABCP to ground and_ airborne forces, JIF to ground forces, TAce/ALec to
al rcraft, Airborne
aircraft and grOlll1d terminals will be placed at Eglin, Bergstrom, MaclJill, Shaw
Altus.
over the nets and results evaluateci to determine feasibiE ty of using multiple access satellite conullunications in a
collect design parameters for future systems, Operational testing is scheduled to begin in ,June 1968 and continue
~i}l rep'!'S5el~t.J:h:C throughout __this_~~L______ .. . _____ __

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

j

PROGRESS

(U) Coonlination meeting on the Master Plan were helel in April and May 1967
The Op Test
for terminal equipmerft have been let., Current plans call for satellite launch in .July 1968, A
TAe Test
conullit TAC resources to the support of this program and will be fonvarded for TAC approval in Nov 196 7 ,
Operational Feasibility Plan with a proposed augmented equiprllent package that 1111.11
test nets"
increased funding approval, Preliminary tests with LES 5 in July 1967 have ShOi"irl
. satellite and should provide a good data base for the Tactical Satellite .

/

intervaL· ;
autornatl., .

.,

  

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

mm mm: . 


     

 

2D Self-Contained

TEST

Eglin Air Porce

Base~ Florida
PART Ie I PA T ING;COORDAGENCY~------'---'--ASD

This
"-.

66.

PROJECT OESCRIPTION

eC) The S-ZG is a Navy anti-submarine aircraft being modified
Grumman Aircraft
interim self··contained night attack aircraft, The aircraft
contain low
primary weapons delivery avionics, The S-ZG program is divided into two
to be used in this program are all retrofits of
airframes, The n1'\r\'l',~t'"\rn"
aircraft have been designated AS-ZD,
PROGRESS

(C) Plans call for modification of two Gnzmnan S-ZD aircraft
time schedule, and normal APSe procedures for \'i'eapon

to a draft and final contractor work statement and "-/>-/>"',nrl,c>r1
a UMD for deplOYIng ten AS 2Ds to SEA has been nr",..,,,.,.,,,rI
receipt of PACAFis comments,a meeting between TAC
system to SEA is
Qtr FY 1969, A contract has
under way, A decision on the go",ahead for
not later than 3 Sep 67, Based on the recovIlIJle~nd;at
CSAF~

 MONTHl Y Sf ATUS REPORT

PROJECT OFFICER/0RGAN/SYM80L/PHONE NO

i t Col WIlham.i

.Allsnn/TA\IJC/DLT/88.2 <S93:.
~~-.~--~~.-~~~-

Flel, (Ui
PARTICIPATING/COORD AGENCY(S)

CSA.f/TAC/ASD/APGC/TAWC
PRIOF{ITY

USA.F 1·)
PHOJECT DESCRIPTION

The quu:k leak
team was

L\~{'d

schedule, lJe'tCC1;, lOn
mfonnatlO11 to

PROGRESS

Fmal report to be forwarded to TAe ASA}

...

~-

•••.........

 MONTH!. Y Sf ATUS REPORT

(C) A B57 aircraft \"ith a pod motmted LLL1V (Westinghousc) and laser ranger_
vidicon tube mated to an electronic zoom
stabllizcd
and laser

associated electronics displays and controls"

PROGRESS

aircraft will he

- - - ---------------------------

(5) A draft test order was coordinated with APGC and fonvarded to TAe
lumter,killer
P,,4/hunter to
and B-57/F,105 hunter-killer
JIU1e 1967"
hunter aircraft in order for the
track
R
aircraft-arrived
the F-4D to receive the X,ha.ndheacon, '£\.,0
iarization wi.th the
equipped with the X-band beacon; Phghts for

test" 11lese parts arc;

 MONTHLY STATUS REP

NUMsERiSiTAc::-tOl5e

assigneOlTITLE

-

..- .

BACKGfWUND

APGC-AS2~~:--20__. _____. __ Gun Ship II~L_._____._. __..__ ._ .. ____.____...._.__.J '

I

PROJECT MANAGER/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

_Cap~iri R. Mow.)Al?.9C/PGOWB/~2 -.75§l.._______________._._______._._.__....__ ._ .....--._... _"_1
PROJECT OFFICER/ORGAN/SYMSOL/PHONE NO

Majo:r.Jol:!!!j{..!.]o~lliTAWC/DLT/882-393S·

'

.

j'

.

__ _
EST COMPL DATE

I
j

.__ j threat

_J

~
PROJEC" DESCRIPTION

(C) Primarily, Gun Ship II is an extension of the AC·47 slueatrnament, consisting of four 1-1·61 Vulcan 20rrun Gatling guns and four
systems including: the Night Observation Device (NOD), side-looking radar
sists of a single tvhite light with IR and UV illuminating
up for the .EOS light.. A forward-looking IR system will be
targets., This project is designed to test sensor effectiveness,
tiles,
PROGRESS

10 (C) Thirty s ..ccesstul test missions
August 1961.

been flovm \Ill th a maximum mlS:;

2. (U) The aircraft is at
AFB for final
tion and modification for overseas deployment, The
to deployment. The EOS light has been installed lID.d tests
. moonlights at 6000 feet AGL
3. (C) Neill gun mounts have been installed for the 20mm
firing accuracy, Modifications to the fire c.ontrol
This sl1o\lls the fire control system to feed more accurate

4. (8) The deployment and combat evaluation plan is being
14 September 1967 as per C8AF (8) msg AFRDDH 86468, 28

emT.Ironment.

  

 

 

 

1% 



   







 

 

 

MONTHl Y STATUS REPORT

ER/SYMBOL./PHONE NO

Lt Col/DT-DF/882-2717
E NO

1882-2717
ASSIGNED DATE

EST COMPL DATE

May 66
PARTICIPAT·ING/COORD AGENCYIS)

Sep 67

INITIATOR

CSAF

USAF (AFXOPWO) . TAC,AfLC,AFSC,ADC,TAWC
PRIORITY

EST REPORT DATe'

USAF 1-7/TAC I-B/APGC lR3

Oct 67

~PR-Oc-J·~E-C-T-D~ES~:C~R~IP~T~ID~N·~--------------~----··~--.---

PHASE or- TESTING

Phase I/n - Active

(ll) The purpose of .the test is to determine from a Category III type test program the
of the AIM-4D system as installed on the F-4D aircraft; to determine the program for a
tactics/techniques for employing the weapon system, The test program will
the
progress of· the missile from receipt by the user through all stages of
to target intercept, The test is divided into two phases - Phase I dealing
primarily with qualification of the 33d Tac Ftr Wg .crews with the AIM-4Do
-.-.-,--~---,~~--------

-" --.

_._----

..

~---

.. -

---

PROGRESS

(8) Results of the live firings:

PHASE I
-

Iaraet
Non -Maneuvering

Kill
~1- 34

~euvering BQM~34

TDU-22
r..'lACE

(~M-13A)

QF-I04
··TOTAL

6
3

a

PHASE

Contact

0 .. 10 1

1
5
1
8

2
3

9
0

,0

18

15

3

12

IS

26

1
9

26

2

1

3

7

29

69

a
a

2

1,

Crew

of 4

2,

Crew·

of

 MONTHLY

REPORT

PROJECT MANAGERISYMBOL/PtWNf. NO

~~~ __!~~~-,-~~j IUSAFr~WC.J'~

. DS2{882- 2517

_____~ _____________________ _

PROJECT OFFICEH/ORGAN/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

ROBERT J o CROTEAU~ CaptjUSAFTAWC (DT'DS)/882~2S17
TE;n~c~i~N~:'~-~;e ~ FlOrid:----------------~sst;:D~~A-T~;~:c~~f~~:ATE
P ART IC I P ATING ICOOR DAG EN

CYlsi--'-'-

. ,.--- ·---""----------~--T~'T'AT-O-R--- -"-- --

IAW~L-AP. GC,_ 33__ TF\I[-a-1-L~-~-J\,Tllig~ Nr"-------------------r.:;-----------~-~~.-- ---EST REPORT DATE, PHASE OF TESTING
Phase IT

PRIORITY

USAF .1.:1LI~Ll:L______________ §~~.J}~J_Q~____~Pl1ases. I J

IV

PRO; ECT DESCRIPTION

Systems involved in this test are the P·4CjD,\ a
homing~ a:ir~toair missile capahle of supersonicat Eglin AFB~ Florida wdng the over water Gul f Test
of the 33 Tac Ftr Wg, Testing will consist of
-the aircraft/missile effective launch envelope \

PROGRESS

Pha.se I has been completed as a six---shot supersonic "Quick--Look" test

three

Phase II (66-49): The
F,,4D aircraft
Center ~ Pt ~1ugu9 California, Physi.cal
priority missions utilizing range and radar
Center for puhlication in the final Phase II

Phase III All planning~ including publication of Phase III Test Plan
is dependent on adequate documentation fOT the testa The National
Phase IlL This will provide the documentation
, AIM~7E
drones have been allocated o The test
date has heen
Phase IV: Phase IV was programmed for six J\IM~'lE
. (Raytheon modified) were fired on 3 and 8 August,
A total ot five missiles have been fin;~d in this
to terminate Phase IVa

104 drones,

 PRIORITY

1~6
PROJECT DESCRIPTION

(S=NOFORN) The test was an op~~ra·tional
Test results were to be used
develop a f"f""",. .......+
Tests at Eglin AFB used agent simulant and
spray tank with aerospace ground equipment,
incurred by the F=4D from aerial spray Ill}..·;'''''''''' 1
evaluate disaster control requirements and
facility until delivery on target •

..---.- ...--- ._...__... _---- ..._. _.--_ ......

PROGRESS

Testing started 12 Jan 67 and "'''as completed 4
5th AF§ 400th M:m Maint Sq and 3l3th Air

67.

Combat
and 17th

 I

~TITLE-

NUM8ER(S)

_67_Ql_l_______4-___J~&.~__
CS_dl_!~~1_ed_~~_"S_2/_B _~tJ)__~ ____________ _
PROJECT MANAGER/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

Capt Ronald R. Barber/DT=CB/882=3056
P'ROJECT OFFICER/ORGAN/SYMBOLIPHONE NO

chemical
cover

---.---------------------.---------------

Capt Ronald R•. Barbe:r/US~AWC/urdCB/882=3056 ______.____ .___________________________________ VIlint
TEST·LOCATION(S)

Eglin ~_ Florida

.

PARTICIPATING/COORD AGENCY'S)

TAC/AFLC/SAWC/TAlI'C/ASD/OOAMA/AFLCfJ\FATI, ....

usA€ 1g 1
T

!!-E

______

IASSIGNED DATE

[EST COMPL DATE

Nellis AFBt~_~~~~__ __________ I Mal'_~~ ______ ~!.~~_67__ _

IB._______

INITIATOR

I

___ -..] __._____~______________.___________________.__ ~

3s~;!~l~~_:

!f:t!ve____ ________

:i;;;:;;TI:G

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

J."'__"'_."_" '_"_"_'._____,. _
_

An OT&E of the eSo·l filled BLU~l/B fire bomb will be conducted
'fAille to deternine the
chemical operations. Test objectives are; (1) Evaluate
to include area=time=perrsistency relationshiP9 pattern
clothing requirements fore .. 130 and 0= IE aircrews ~ for
adon methods and procedures; (5) Evaluate the stockpile~to=target SeCl.Uel:lce
result if bulk CS~l is exposed to fire 9 low ocler detonation$ or ",-r-f""I"'f"<::·
(S)

.-------,-~----~------------------

PROGRESS

I..i;UJ<;tI.l.!.J.J.

---

(U) Agent testing was initiated 011 1 July 1967. To date five of ten scheduled releases have been
completed on 7 August 1967. Pyrolytic deCOtt/p05ition
the week of 28
the USAF Precedence Rating was requested.

 EST REPORT DATE
~,,_,

15 Oct 67

____ ,_, ________________ L_ _

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

(S) Phase A testing of RAM is mtended to examine its
RAM is essenttally the Army shoulder"launcher
adaptable to all aircraft with present AIM,9 capabil1 ty 9
considering various launch parameters within .the launch
launch envelopes as well as possible procurement of the RAlvI

missile~

l!----------,-"----------'''-,-------,-,-------,,--,-,,---'''' ,-, -------.,.---,----,-PROGRESS

\

'

1,

Three Launch Test Vehicles (LTV) fired on 8-9 Aug 67 to document missile

20

Captive misslOns flown on 10 Aug 67 ''lith a live seeker head for crew

3"

First Guidance Test Vehicle (GTV) with

40

First warhead shot on 16 Aug 67 against the

5a

Two warhead shots against the IvQ1= 13A on 17 Aug 67

6"

First missile fired against the maneuvering

.. 7"

Program delayed one week to rectify a minor
difficulties

section fired

resulted in

BQf\~"·34A

In one close
on 22

Next firing

9"

Phase A

67 contained
'which was

0

8"

on

scheduled for 6

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

I
a 
SEWEDN 11
WEE TEENS

 

 

 

 

 

 

MONTi'll Y STATUS REPORT

UNCLASSIFIED

TAWC
APGC
729
__
____ _ _
_ _TCS
_ ._.._______ ._._

_._~.

.l..~

PRIORITY

~_'

"

./

The Westinghouse Electric Corporation has offered Ti\WC its
no cost to the government, This system of power generation
most practical lightweight engines yet developed, This
combined with the
problems associated with power generation in the tactical environment,
prime power source for as many types of tactical 400-cycle
evaluate its load capacity, stability, fuel consumption, and
PROCRESS

The draft test order was submitted to TAC on 6 JWle 1967, The 60 -kw
was checked out by factory Tepresentatives on 24 May 67 aIKi was
Phase I of testing has been completed.. This consisted of load
:3 July, and it consisted of 24 hour operation at the eRe site,

instrumentation checks,
Tae Con

Test ,\las completed on 18 July 1967, Final report now
considered for use in the Tactical Air Control

The

editeci,

lJNCLASSIFIED

to be a

    

33mm rm
. 

SUPWRT TEST EWURTS ANS TEST 

 

 

 

 

Egg; 
g?

?w .v 

14%

 

 

 

 



 

 

Tm: 

 

 

   

 

 



 

MOllllHl Y S1 ATlIS REPORT
NUMBER IS)

D (Joint Test) (U)

APGC 681AYl

...~----.------------.---------.-!

PROJECT MANAGER/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

Robert P. Arndt, MajoE., USA£L

DCl~882-4~~~ _____._____.___.... ___.__._._... _.._.

PROJECT OFFICER/ORGAN/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

~obert

P. Arndt, Major,

TEtii~~A~~S) ~~a;

_~§AF_l

Pt HuadlUca,

TAWC (DeT),

Ar.~~___.

882~_466l_

___________

PARTICIPATING/COORD AGENCY(S)

_____---,-_ _

.J_~;J;E~~;1T.:._1E~)~ C;!~~~~~TEIINITIATOR

Amy, Coast Guard, Aii' Force
DOD
P~~~Y~~----.----------- ·rI~R~;;R~.~~t]P;~~:;:1:ESTING

.-.

OEscRip.r,oN·-TuY--LORAt\1 Dl::icticalNaVIgational ~SysteI11·wifibet:ested-as
engineering and operational approach to tiemonstrate military effectiveness ,md
the active testing will be held in the Eglin area and a second
in the
precision LORAN system employing automatic envelope and RF phas.e comparison
and ground vehicles. The system is composed of a three transmitter group
of LORAN receiver sets,

PROJECT

value
Aiiz, area,
intended to be used
monitor station

PROGRESS----ruy4-··-LOl~N C

statio}; at-Dana,II1'dTana~~ --i)·ec';lne····operational on
This
. provides coverage over Eglin" Since the LORAN D transmitters! delivery has
to November
to test the LORAN C/D airborne navigation sets
A contract .was released in November 1966 for
delivery within one year,
0

(C) All flight tests which supported contractor Clesign changes were halted as
modifications were accomplished during April as preparatory to prograllllled
accuracy flights have been completecL Repeatable accuracies of appToximately
mately 550 NM from the test area), A new tailcap anterma has been mounted on the
maintained through 6G turns" p .. lj·C accuracy flights were curta-ilen on 5 Aug 67 because of mul tj
were resuined on 24 Aug 67" The C,,130 is being modified to install 3 loran sets for mutual
allocation scheduling has made it necessary to reduce·the test bed aircraft from is to S"
completion of the accuracy tests, the five aircraft will begin maneuver and
tests"
(U) The JTF test plan is currently being revised to readjust the
and to eliminate, or reduce, certain aspects of the operational tests.,

of the test .,
revision
.1.

 MOHTHl Y STATUS. REPO!H'

UNCLASSIFIED

AGENCY(S}

APSC~~CS."L~~Cp A'!:s:L1~\!C
PRIORITY

APse lSB

The Forward Air Control Post is the forward element of
minimal radar and communication facility designed to
lance/control cover3ge and to provide increased lo;v
ing basic equipments scheduled ;for CAT III
c,
lio AN/TSQ~61 ~ Operations Center
b, AN/TSC<o53
Communications Center
do
Scatter Terminal
In most deplo~nents an AN/TRC~97A

PROJECT DESCfllPTION

2D R..'tdar

Units

PROGRESS

Category II Test Plan revised 9 May 670

Integration and checkout tests of the TPS,,44.
Equipment scheduled to be delivered to
The

AN/TPS~44

is at the factory for retrofit,

TAe Test Force personnel have now been

"\

TSC~S3

and

AI<B to start active

The

and

name for the CAT

I

U!\'CLASSIFIED

 MO~THlY

STATUS REPORT UNCLASSIFIED

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

minimal radar and cOlmmmication facility designed to provide the
control coverage and to provide increased 10\4 level coverage for
basic equipments scheduled for CategOIY III testing.
ao AN/TSQ··61 - Operations Center
b, AN/TSC-S3 - Communications Center
In most
cO AN/TPS-44 - Lighuveight 21) Radar
part of
d,
"' Ground Power Units

aircraft corltrol
most f01'l\'an1 coverage
the
mid··course
deployments an
the FACP.

PROGRESS

Category III test objectives approved by tlq TAC on 26 July 1967,
Detailed procedures for the test plan, Annex G, TAe

66··

are

lJNCk\SSIF lED

written,

 MOMTHl Y STATUS REPORT

of Two Lightweight

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Radio Sets

,

first link will be
properly, The second link
the second link is successful, the third link will have tenllinals separated
run,
2, Tests will compare the capabilities of the AN/TRC~'104 and AN/TRC·,lOS with each other
simultaneously measuring the following parameters; (a) Carrier to-noise ratio,
intelligibility,
3, Evaluations of the
maintenance
and
PROGRESS

10

L,O,S, checkout of equipment is completed,

However, test completion date will be

2, F<iilures of the test items and the instrumentation have
TRC·I04 and is installing a new Frederick 600 instnuuentation

the
V'--''''-",-

test

 MANAGER/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

(8) To provide ll1tegration between hunter aircraft, killer aircraft and cOl1unanu and can t fa 1
communicating LORAN D position data aillong the participating elements; hunter- aircraft will
transmi t the pos ition data for. use by conIDmnd an<l control and Kiner aircraft, Four
the first three phases are concerned with pOl'lions of the
L
2" Acquisition of equipme.nt for SEA; 3, Acquisition of equipment to
Staions' (control centers) ins~~allation, and evaluation with airborne
PROGRESS

L

(U)

The concept formulation package has been approved, flmds have not been

2, (C) Sperry has submitted a proposal to demonstrate Blind
Weapons Computer, The proposal is currently being evaluated by
3, (U) Mitre Corporation has submitted a technical
on Communications
Equipment for Tactical Air WarfareThis proposal concerns the entire
readout and display equipmenL Ti\WC !las made the recorIancnclation that the airborne readout
package,

 MOMTHl Y STATUS REPORT
NUMBERISl

R&D Anti-SAM

~'------------'--------------------~--------------'~~"-'-"""

Pf-10JECT DESCRIPTION

(U) A number of projects which CQuid have
and by other development agencies within DOD, TAWC will monitor these
TAWC will also make recomrnendations ,on new projects or test programs as

- ..

---------.'--.~---.".-.---~----.-.--~----~------.-'--,-¥"'"-.--.-,----

PROGRESS

(3)

1,

The following' programs are amohg those

QRC·314 fuze j ammc!',

monitored.

Flight test completed, TAWC recommendations forwarded to

2, QRe 333 Homing Receivet'o SEC, development
ment isschcdu1ed to be installed and tested

3.

QRe 350 COMPASS HOME,

Development program to

4, QRC-361 ECM Pod improvement.
develop a"C" band canister,

5,

QRC-370.,

Program to

Program to evaluate low

chaff made of metal

 COMPL OATE

responsible for test
conduct and
both
and
evaluate aircrew ability to fly an effective RCM
SAM radars to evaluate SAM attrition
The F,,4
ancraft
be "'4'C"-'.;'I''-',""
data analysis support" The 33 Tae Ftr Wg will provide aircraft and

PROGRESS

~Phase

I Cfonnation evaluation) was cornpleted 4
but erratic ECM pod functioning produced limited

Further testing has been suspended by SAC

three

and

of data ohtamed

 )

UNCLASSIFIED
MONTHl Y STATUS REPORT
OHIGIN OPEf-tATION

USAF 1-7
PRO.! ECT DESCRIPTION

To design, develop, and fabricate a five millior
be compatible with standard ejection racks and be ... a!~alJ.l" of

flare with a
up to

PROGRESS

Twenty live MLU,-32 flares dropped to date with favorable results, TAC
requirements of SEAOR 47, All subsystems for
have been released
The Navy proposes to slip ar&E delivery date until
1967, but Air Force
production date is based on initial standardization of the B-3 version flare
version during testing at Eglin Air Force Base and at Nars.

time

.2.

 MOHTHl Y STATUS REl-'O

(U) Design, development, and fabrication of a multi-modular
and MLU-44/B flareso This task objective includes the
produce five million'
of illumination and bum
C-130, and other cargo··type
as required,
..

-~-

...--....--..- ....-

...

---~----.-----~---

....

PROGRESS

(U) LAU 62 modules have gone to Crestview for modification to correct
is required fOT modification, Modification of the MLU-44 flare is also
LAU-62/MLU-44 testing should resume
'in ~eli)temb(~r

 PROJECT MANAGER/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

_____________________________________

_11&_JQ~~ph_AUr~gj1\PGCl£GQZE/Jlli2..::lQ.4.4
PROJECT OFFICER/ORGAN/SYMBOLIPHONE NO

f:1<U9.1: E,_-'pere zlIJi,WCll)1..1'l!HIZ~..3.935 ____________
TEST LOCATIONISI

__.r;gl:i!L!\i.Lf9..I~c;;~.Ji~~~..._l"1Qtida_
PARTICIPATING/COo;,O AGI:NCYIS\

P-I05s
numbers 738 and 774 have been at
scheduled for flight test in late
but
that was installed

1966

11)

aircraft T74 was il1,,,talled
LORAN-D equipment scheduled to bt; tested on the.:;t;
the coopel'ation of the LORA1\J·-D Test Force, LOR/\l\! t:qUlj:JllIt:1l

\-

 MONTHl Y 5T ATUS
(Monitored)
NLIMSERtSl TAe Test No 66- 160
APGC Proj_Ji~L 155_9!.......!:..T~as~k~66~_.__"'.,,_~~~'!-_.','-+_,,_"'....~,.±_':__~~~o'C-'-""'-"-l.."'--"",~''''-'--.~'''-'--'''-'-'--'--''-J--""",---"""-,,,---'
PROJECT MANAGER/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

C§!t1taill_J.!!Q~f.~:i,Q/.ASDIM3JB~2336 _ __
PROJ ECT OF' FICER/ORGAN/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

INITIATOR

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

(U) To develop

iii.

fire,

volume launcher for the C-130 aircraft

PROGRESS

1"

(U) Test suspended November 19660

Restarted

1967, but

/

2,.. (U) Flight testing was suspended 1:7
movement in the storage rows during latmche:r
3"

(U) A meeting

due to deflciencies

was held at WRAMA between WRAMA and Fairchild !-hller on

that additional funding is requhed to modify exist
recommended using the C-130 latmcher as a

APSe recommended
M1.U-44,

 (C) C-123B aircraft fitted with four night sensors, Fomnrd
Laser Ranger, Outputs from these sensors nre used tt)

Westinghouse~

L
(C) Personnel for the Black Spot program are heing
arrived at Eglin in Jlme 1967,

U:>.:>.L)'"''''

Radar

Alltonetics
information

pes SAWC with

liI:

2,

(C) APGC test project directive completed on 7 June 1967. and a

3"

(C) R·57 aircraft arrived at Eglin during month of

1967 without infrared

"'~I.U"'!JIII<"j

 ~~~~~M~on~i~'____-r~_~________'____________
NUMbERISl

'rAe Test No 66-·33/

APGC PI' . N

_lli.9Ql _ _ ....lJ,~m~~91!)!::.-'!.;t,g~r. ..tt!-!~..lL.J..!LL.....__.___ ._._......._.____ -----......--1

PROJECT MANAGEH!SYMBOL/PHONE NO

PROJECT

Major John

R~owe:r/J~CLDLTL882-393S

TEST LOCATIONIS)

E lin Ai! Force Ba~.J::J...9.r.ida _______ .. __. ___._______+_~'.L.,"_l"'_L_"'."__"'L.....L._"""""'i""_" ...."""'_'"._'--1
PARTICIPA-rtNG/COORO AGENCYISl

INITIATOR

USAF 1PROJ ECT OESCRIPTION

(C) The Forward Looking
(FUR 1) system was
gun nose section of the aircraft was modified to
crew compartment and is equipped with a CFT type .~~_,,.,.~,~,
compartment of the aircraft.

Texas Instruments

scanner and
master controls

-------..--------

PROGRESS

~ompleted

I.

CU) Tests

13 July 1967.

2.

CU) Lonesome Tiger II reports are being drafted,

Lonesome

I

will he

  

1-3.4?

   

 

 

SECTEGN 1v

P?ejaaT? Amy yam?mg?? 

   

 

,9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SPECIAL 

 

   

 

)

MONTHl V S1 AllJS REPORT

AGENCYIS)

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

(C) TAWC will continually monitor the development of these F-lllA
experience in these fields. When changes in the enemy '""'!I"""""".L
they have on F-lllA requirements. Recommemlations will

<,
PROGRESS

(S) Radar Homing and Warning. A thorough initial analysis of the
and recommendations were made to TAC. TIllS study concluded that the
Specific'clmnges have been recommended.

TAe has submitted to ASD a consolidated list of APS-I09 deficiencies which must be
:C11lB. The majority of these have been incorporated for Harvest
aircraft
aircraft r~ceive similar mods.
Electronic, Countermeasures: TAWC has made recomnendations to TAC ",...'nF'~',""
Trackbreaker, and TAe has provided CSAF reco~nendations for the overall
A meeting on F-'111APenetration Aids was held on 4
TAe is reviewing possible equipment for these

at

TAe at which ASn hriefed

 MONTHL Y STATUS REPORT

PROJ ECTDESCRIPTION

(S) TAWC is monitoring all efforts to develop E(J'v1 for
control panels and pylons to pennit use of
equipment, both pylon~mounted and internaL TAWC
modifications, tactics or testing as required,

tE5 jSS The QRC-160-·1 EOvl pod is presently being used by F·lOS and
Fire Can radars" All of the original QRC ·160-1
are in the
time,. The 8TFl'1 is presently modifying both aircraft and
to
missions have been flown with aircraft
ASD
is final
developing an internal power mod for
TIle QRC'160,8 is an improved ECM pod that has a
used by the QRC·160L 'Ihe ···8 pod consists of three
can be used at a time, A joint APGC/TAWC test 15
S"band TlVS and AM
The results were sent to
were the recommended modes. A test is
The Giant Stride IV testing was suspended due to poor
evaluation, The next phase of the test will be to evaluate
The QRC"335A (SEED SESAJl.ffi) is a program to
active
Sband TWS and AM~ ·C" band TWS and the
missile fUle
has been f1own~ in the
mode, in APGC tests
in the simulatoI' at Fort
ASD.directed APGC tests be
data is available to

PRO

0

 MOHTHl Y !iT ATUS REPORT
CONCEPT

PARTICIPATING/COORD AGENCY(S)

PRIORITY

or

TESTING

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

For reasons of project sensitivity, det<l,ils of this

PROGRESS

are omitted ft'om this

  

     

   

 

 



 

 

CONCEPT

BIAS Hunter

EST REPORT DATE

USAF 1··7

CY 1969

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

(C) C-130 aircraft equipped with BIAS lighting
and sensors to
the
and Forward Looking Radar. A flare launching
for alternate
of area illumination
is available, Oper-2j,tor stations for each of the prime sensors and for control of the BIAS
provided.

PROGRESS

1, (C) Recent CSAF message states that 11 C-130A aircraft will
communications equipment, and back-up flare launcher

2. (8) First aircraft is at LTV for installation of BIAS
$2604 million of modification funds are

modified

 MOMTHL Y STATUS
NUMSERIS)

To be
PROJECT MANAGER/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

Will~;;llll~__!~_~,~~/TAWC/DLPL??_2_:!.6.!l1________________., ____ ,
PROJECT OFFICER/ORGAN/SYMBOL/PHONE NO

. Will i_~_E.~,.Ihl;1.<.:~~iT~C/DI?/ ~?~: 1_~§7
TEST LOCATIONIS)

Florida
PARTICIPATING/COORD AGENCYIS)

CSAF/TAC/AFSC/AFLC/TAWC

Pf!iIQR~---"----'--'-·--·--

--

To be determined
PROJECT DESCRIPTION

(8) Taking advantage of the components developed

the RB-S7F

nn~al'~m

new configuration that will provide an increased range and

level TV (LLLTV), forward looking radar with a
.,
-~-,-,---~.---.--.-----~------.,

~----~.--------------"-

..----- .. --_..,,-.

PROGRESS

(U) Presently in the preplanning and

have

bee~

briefed

 To be

Unknown

PHOJECT DESCRIPTION

(S) To provide integration between hunter aircraft
and command
conununicating LORAN-D position data among the
elements; hunter
transmit the position data for use by command and
, and killer aircraft"
acquisition. installation, and evaluation; (2) Acquisition of
for
to modify other aircraft,
PROGRESS

L

(U) The name of this item has been changed since last month to agree with AFIWDA'

2,

(U) Formal approval of this program has not

30

(U) It is not known when testing will

been received,
so

estj.m,.'l.ted time of

 HQ USAF
Wash. DC 20330
AFXSAI

1

AFRD{T

1

AFRDQRF

1
1
1
5

APRDqRA

AFRDDE
AFXOPW
AFRlx) •
AnmQRC
A1UlJORT

AFIUx)',p
AJ:OCE
CNO (OP 722)
Wash DC 20330

3

1
1

1
1

1

USAFE
APO New York 09633
OTA~R

3

OTO

2

CINCPACAF (WRQ)
APO San Francisco 96553
AUL3T-64-180
ivlaxwell APB Ala 36112
TAG
Langley Al"B Va 23365
OA
OORQ
WFT
OOOS

OOAL

DIXA

OOTS
DEPL
oopep
WRE

DPLMJ
OCR

OIB

5
1

1
5
2
1
2
4

1
1

1

SAC (DOOK) A11'N ~ TACLO
Offutt APBs NebI' 68113

5A"'1',,1)\

7 JlJ?
1

APO San Francisco
DO

APSe (SCS)
Andrews AFB
Wash DC 20331

DPLR
OO"TACLO
2

rIQ AFLC
Wright,· Patterson APB
Ohio 45433
MCFPM
. MQ.ITA
MCSCA
MCOOM
MCOOF
ASD
Wright-Patterson AFB
Ohio 45433
TACSO-A
A5L
AS}
ASZM

1
1

1
1
1

DO

2

~1EMA

1

12 AF
13AF
APO San Francisco 96274
BAP

APO San Francisco 96274
1
1
1

2

17 AF
09012

1

19 AF

ESD (ESLT)
LoDo Hanscom Field
Bedford Mass 01730

Johnson

NC

ABD
1

Naval Air Systems Command
Code Air PM 18
Wash DC 20360
JCS JTF~2
ATI'N; JTP,·Z Tech
Sandia Base ~~x 87115

1

OOAMA
Utah 84401
Hill
OONE
OONF
OONL
OONR

OOND
1

WIWv1)\
Robins

3 AF (3~OTO)
APO New York 09125

1
SAP
1
1 ' APO
1

9 AF
Shm", APB SC

1
9652S

1

OCN

1

838

 ~~

!?~ON_~2!'m~~
{

31 Tae Ftr Ivg

Homestead APB Fla 33030

1

313 Trp Carr Wg (lM)
ForbesAFB Kans 66620

1

1

316 Trp Carr Wg (IJ(JfG)
Lalll.fl.ey AFB Va 23365

1

317 Trp Carr Wg
Lockbourne APB Ohio 43217

2

APATL
Eglin APB PIa 32542
ATW
ATWT
ATWB
A1IIJD

1
1

Eglin APB Fla 32542

1

USAFTARC (m)

1

Shaw APR SC 29152

1

APGC
Eglin APB Fla 32542
PGOT
PGOW
PGOY

3

MAc:J342

3

516 Trp Carr Wg
Dyess APB Tex 79607

1

4442 eel' TngWg
Sewart ·APB Tenn 37168

1

Weapon System Evaluation
400 Army~Navy Dr
Arlington Va 22202
ATTN: PAeAN
1

1

Marine Corps Liaison Officer
US Army Aviation Test Board
Fort Rucker Ala 36360 1

eel'

PGBPS~12

Tug Wg (DOW)
APE Ariz

Davis~Monthan

85707
4510 CCT Tng Wg (DO)

Luke AFE Ariz 85301

2

USAFSO (TXP)

APO New York 09825

RAND

AP 31'
Cen
San Antonio Texas

479 Tae Ftr Wg
George AFB Calif 92393

4453

Institute for Defense
Dr
400
22202

1

1
1
1

USNLO (lCAG)

464 TacAlft Wg
Pope APE NC 28308

Nellis AFB Nav 89110
1'I\IT
FI'iS,;CAD

33 Tae Ftr Wg (DOTS)
Eglin APB Fia 32542

64 Tae AUt Wg
Sewart APB Tenn 37168

LNO
32542

USAFfFWC

1

1

Marine
Marine Corps
Quantico Va 22134
ATTN:
Air
mv

1
1

1

Force Dev

1

USAPSAWC~LC

APR

1