On the week of November 28, 2016, New Hampshire Public Radio emailed questions to Shane Brady and
Arthur Sullivan about allegations against Brady Sullivan Properties made by consumers and regulators.
Brady and Sullivan did not answer those questions, but in a series of email exchanges the company’s
attorney, Marc Pinard, did respond. Below are Attorney Pinard’s answers.
On the lawsuits filed by Brady Sullivan’s customers.
As noted in your assertion, the complaints and claims were in the form of accusations, all of which are
denied by Brady Sullivan. Neither Brady Sullivan nor any of its related limited liability companies have
ever been determined by any court to have committed fraud, breach of contract, misrepresentation or
violations of consumer protection laws and there has never been a judicial finding that homes sold or
rented were unsafe due to construction flaws.

On regulators’ conclusion that Brady Sullivan has violated public health laws.
As noted in the question, some regulators have made accusations but no judicial determination has
been made with respect to any of the allegations. Brady Sullivan has cooperated with the regulators at
all stages of the investigation. The allegations arise from the clean up and restoration of environmentally
challenged historic properties. In every instance, Brady Sullivan hired professional environmental
consultants and contractors to properly handle and dispose of materials in conformity with all
environmental laws and regulations. Those contractors were contractually bound and expected to
properly handle the materials. Brady Sullivan has not violated any public health laws.
On complaints from laborers who say they were not paid while working on Brady Sullivan job sites.
The matters raised in this assertion relate to alleged conduct of third party contractors on jobs that do
not relate to Brady Sullivan. As such, Brady Sullivan has no comment as to the purported claims. Brady
Sullivan does not control the labor practices of its contractors, however, in all of its contracts, there is a
requirement that Brady Sullivan’s contractors comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws and
regulations. Also, Brady Sullivan conducts no business in the State of Connecticut.
On further questioning about labor complaints.
With regard to the wage claims you have asked us to comment upon, you should realize that all of these
claims are being made by employees against their employers. The employers were independent
contractors. No claims have been asserted against Brady Sullivan. While an employee of an
independent contractor may identify the job site they worked on as being owned by Brady Sullivan or an
affiliate, it does not change the fact that no claims have been asserted against Brady Sullivan and the
claims do not relate in any way to the conduct or actions of Brady Sullivan.