KIN16359 S.L.C. 114m CONGRESS 21) SESSION S. To provide for the consideration of a definition of anti-Semitism for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education pro- grams or activities. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES Mr. REID introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on A BILL To provide for the consideration of a definition of anti? Semitism for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimina? tion laws concerning education programs or activities. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa? 2 fives of the United States ofAmemlca Congress assembled, 3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 4 This Act maybe cited as the ?Anti?Semitism Attrare? 5 ness Act of 2016?. 6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 7 Congress makes the following findings: 8 (1) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: (re- 9 ferred to in the section as ?title is one of the KIN16359 s.L.c. 2 principal antidiscrimination statutes enforced by the Department of Education?s Office for Civil Rights. (2) Title VI prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin. (3) Both the Department of Justice and the Department of Education have properly concluded that title VI prohibits discrimination against Jews, Muslims, Sikhs, and members of other religious groups when the discrimination is based on the group?s actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics or when the discrimination is based 011 actual or perceived citizenship or residence in a country whose residents share a dominant religion or a distinct religious identity. (4) A September 8, 2010 letter from Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez to Assistant Sec~ retar 7 for Civil Rights H. Ali stated that ?[a]lthough Title VI does not prohibit discrimination on the basis of religion, discrimination against Jews, Muslims, Sikhs, and members of other groups vio? lates Title VI when that discrimination is based on the group?s actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics? . (5) To assist State and local educational agen? cies and schools in their efforts to comply with Fed- IGN16859 sno. 3 eral law, the Department of Education periodically issues Dear Colleague letters. On a number of occa? sions, these letters set forth the Department of Edu- cation?s interpretation of the statutory and regu? latory obligations of schools under title VI. (6) On September 13, 2004, the Department of Education issued a Dear Colleague letter regarding the obligations of schools (including colleges) under title VI to address incidents involving religious dis- crimination. The 2004 letter specifically notes that ?since the attacks of September 11, 2001, OCR has received complaints of race or national origin harass- ment commingled with aspects of religious discrimi? nation against Arab Muslim, Sikh, and Jewish stu? dents?. (7) An October 26, 2010 Dear Colleague letter issued by the Department of Education stated, ?While Title VI does not cover discrimination based solely on religion, groups that face discrimination on the basis of actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics may not be denied protection under Title VI on the ground that they also share a common faith. These principles apply not just to Jewish students, but also to students from any dis? crete religious group that shares, or is perceived to KIN16359 8.11.0. 4 share, ancestr or ethnic characteristics Mus~ lims or (8) Anti-Semitism remains a persistent, dis- turbing problem in elementary and secondary schools and on college campuses. (9) Jewish students are being threatened, har- assed, or intimidated in their schools (including on their campuses) on the basis of their shared ancestr or ethnic characteristics including through harassing conduct that creates a hostile environment so severe, pervasive, or persistent so as to interfere with or limit some students? ability to participate in or ben- efit from the services, activities, or Opportunities of? fered by schools. (10) The 2010 Dear Colleague letter cautioned schools that they ?must take prompt and effective steps reasonably calculated to end the harassment, eliminate any hostile environment, and its effects, and prevent the harassment from recurring,? but did not provide guidance on current manifestation of anti?Semitism, including discriminatory anti?Semitic conduct that is couched as anti?Israel or anti-Zion? ist. (11) The definition and examples referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 8 have been valu- KIN16359 S.L.C. 5 able tools to help identify contemporary manifesta- tions of anti?Semitisn'i, and include useful examples of discriminatory anti?Israel conduct that crosses the line into anti?Semitism. (12) Awareness of this definition of antiuSemi? tism will increase understanding of the parameters of contemporary anti?Jewish conduct and will assist the Department of Education in determining Wheth? er an investigation of anti-Semitism under title VI is warranted. SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Act, the term ?definition of anti? Semitism? ?m (1) includes the definition of anti?Semitism set forth by the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti?Semitism of the Department of State in the Fact Sheet issued on June 8, 2010, as adapted from the Working Definition of Anti?Semitism of the Eu- rOpean Monitoring Center on Racism and Xeno- phobia (now knouui as the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights); and (2) includes the examples set forth under the headings ?Contemporar Examples of Anti?Semi- ?VVhat is Anti?Semitian Relative to tism? and Israel?? of the Fact Sheet. KIN16359 oxmwismwr?xo S.L.C. 6 SEC. 4. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000c] et seq.) on the basis of race, color, or national origin, based on an individual?s actual or perceived shared Jewish ancestr or Jewish ethnic char- acteristics, the Department of Education shall take into consideration the definition of anti?Semitism as part of the Department?s assessment of whether the alleged practice was motivated by anti?Semitic intent. SEC. 5. CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS. Nothing in this Act, or an amendment made by this Act, shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Con- stitution of the United States.