Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------X LIDIJA UJKIC p/k/a LIDIA CURANAJ, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY FOX, INC., FOX : ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LLC, FOX : TELEVISION STATIONS, LLC, and BYRON : HARMON, in his individual and professional : capacities, : : Defendants. : --------------------------------------------------------------X Civil Action No.: COMPLAINT Jury Trial Demanded Plaintiff Lidija Ujkic, professionally known as Lidia Curanaj (“Ms. Curanaj”), hereby alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This July, the misogynistic culture at Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. (“Fox”) was exposed when former Fox News Network, LLC (“FNC”) anchor Gretchen Carlson filed a lawsuit alleging that former FNC and Fox Television Stations, LLC (“FTS”) Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) Roger Ailes (“Ailes”) subjected her to a litany of sexually harassing comments and actions, including ultimately telling Ms. Carlson that her career would have been well served had she agreed to have sex with Ailes. 2. Despite Ailes’ denials, other former female employees at Fox came forward with similar allegations that depicted a boss who regularly demanded sexual favors from female staff, made sexually charged and degrading comments with impunity and did nothing to conceal his lewd behavior. To date, the stories of approximately 24 women, whose professional interactions with Ailes spanned two decades, shockingly reveal that Ailes regularly used his position of Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 2 of 28 power to threaten and control women in junior positions through sexual conduct, including, but by no means limited to:  Laurie Luhn, a former FNC booker who alleged, inter alia, that Ailes forced her to recruit young staffers for him and told her, “You are going to find me ‘Roger’s Angels.’ You’re going to find me whores.”  Kellie Boyle, a communications consultant, alleges that Ailes retaliated against her after she rebuffed his sexual advances, and that Ailes told her, “You know if you want to play with the big boys, you have to lay with the big boys.”  Rudi Bakhtiar, a former FNC correspondent who says that she was fired for complaining about sexual harassment, who alleges that Ailes demanded that she stand up for him during a job interview so he could see her legs and subsequently sent her miniskirts to wear at work.  Shelley Ross, who alleges that Ailes told her that “loyalty” in the workplace is extremely important and that he believes that the best expression of loyalty comes in the form of a “sexual alliance.”  Marsha Callahan, who alleges that Ailes told her that he would be able to advance her modeling career if she were willing to sleep with him, and also alleges that Ailes asked her on multiple occasions to lift up her skirt for him, as well as to wear a garter belt.  Andrea Tantaros, who alleges that Ailes asked her to twirl for him, requested that she hug him and made comments about her body, including that she must look good in a bikini. 3. The fallout from the women’s allegations was swift and severe. Shortly after Ms. Carlson’s complaint, Rupert Murdoch, the owner of Fox, demanded that Ailes step down. Thereafter, Fox’s internal investigation unearthed evidence that sexual harassment of women employees extended beyond Ailes and his immediate circle. Tragically, reports leaked about the number of women working for Fox’s various subsidiaries that, over the last decade, personally experienced or witnessed other women being subjected to intimidation and sex-based conduct at 2 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 3 of 28 the hands of male managers, supervisors and co-workers throughout the company in various departments.1 4. Unsurprisingly, the top-down harassment spread throughout Fox, permeating the work environment across departments and affecting women employees. 5. Unfortunately, for Ms. Curanaj, the newsroom at WNYW/Ch. 5 (“Fox5”) is yet another Fox work environment led by a male manager who follows Ailes’ lead as to what is acceptable conduct and perpetuates a work culture where women are marginalized and regularly subjected to unequal treatment as compared to their similarly situated male colleagues. 6. Hired by Fox5 in 2011 as a general assignment reporter, Ms. Curanaj repeatedly has been denied a full time position by Byron Harmon (“Harmon”), who has worked as Fox5’s News Director since 2012. Harmon has also engaged in a campaign to reduce the number of shifts Ms. Curanaj receives, which directly affects her compensation. Now that Ms. Curanaj has become pregnant, Harmon’s treatment of her has only worsened. 7. The unlawful discriminatory motives underlying Harmon’s treatment of Ms. Curanaj are demonstrated by his near constant use of discriminatory language that evinces bias against women, pregnant women, older individuals, people of Balkan descent and individuals with illnesses, including, inter alia,  Telling Ms. Curanaj that she cannot anchor because she is “not attractive enough.”  Telling Ms. Curanaj that she “look[s] like shit” or that she “looks sick.”  Providing full time reporter positions to at least eight less qualified employees, all of whom are substantially younger than Ms. Curanaj. 1 See http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/06/business/media/roger-ailes-hints-at-suit-against-new-yorkmagazine.html?_r=0. 3 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 4 of 28  Removing Sharon Crowley from her role as the main fill-in anchor on Fox5, and telling Ms. Crowley that she was “too old” to anchor and that she “look[ed] like a Midwestern soccer mom.”  Expressing his belief to Ms. Curanaj, who he ignorantly believed to be of Albanian descent, when she is in fact from Montenegro, that “all Albanians are doormen or criminals.”  Referring to Ms. Curanaj as “Ms. Albania.”  Suggesting to another female employee who became pregnant that she would rather “stay at home and spend time with [her] baby” than return to work.  Warning a female employee who was recently promoted against becoming pregnant by saying, “I hope you are not planning on getting pregnant anytime soon.” 8. Despite Harmon’s opinion of her looks, Ms. Curanaj was attractive enough for Ailes to give her a “private interview” during which he had her stand up and twirl around for him. Ailes “liked” what he saw. During this interview, Ailes explained that FNC’s “recipe for success” is to make sure that the women on FNC are shown “from the feet up,” meaning that their legs would be visible to the television audience. Ailes stated that, for this reason, it is “important [for female talent] to look good from head to toe.” 9. Like the other women employees at Fox who feared coming public with their complaints, Ms. Curanaj believed that she was doomed to suffer under Harmon’s discriminatory exercise of power. However, after the recent disclosure of her pregnancy, Ms. Curanaj was subjected to even more discriminatory conduct, and, disturbingly, following her protected complaints to Fox5 about her pregnancy related discrimination, Defendants reduced Ms. Curanaj’s work schedule even further. 10. This complaint follows. This action seeks declaratory, injunctive and equitable relief, as well as monetary damages, against Defendants for discrimination in violation of: (i) 42 4 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 5 of 28 U.S.C. § 1981 (“§ 1981”); (ii) the New York State Human Rights Law, New York Executive Law §§ 290 et seq. (“NYSHRL”); and (iii) the New York City Human Rights Law, New York Administrative Code §§ 8-101 et seq. (“NYCHRL”). JURISDICTION AND VENUE 11. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343 as this action involves federal questions regarding the deprivation of Plaintiff’s rights under federal law. This Court has supplemental subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s related state and local law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). 12. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to this action, including the unlawful employment practices alleged herein, occurred in this district. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES 13. Plaintiff will file a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) alleging violations of: (i) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”); (ii) Title VII as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1974 (“PDA”); and (iii) the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq., as amended by the ADA Amendments Act (the “ADA”). When the EEOC issues Ms. Curanaj’s Notice of Right to Sue, she will seek leave to amend this Complaint to add claims for Defendants’ violations of Title VII, the PDA and the ADA. 14. Pursuant to NYCHRL § 8-502, Plaintiff will serve a copy of this Complaint upon the New York City Commission on Human Rights and the New York City Law Department, Office of the Corporation Counsel within ten days of its filing, thereby satisfying the notice requirements of this action. 5 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 6 of 28 15. Plaintiff has complied with any and all other prerequisites to filing this action. PARTIES 16. Plaintiff Lidija Curanaj lives in Westchester County, New York. Plaintiff is employed by Defendants as a “Freelance Reporter.”2 At all relevant times, Plaintiff met the definition of an “employee” under all applicable statutes. 17. Defendant Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. is a corporation with its principal place of business in New York County, New York, and is duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware. At all relevant times, Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. has met the definition of an “employer” of Plaintiff under all applicable statutes. 18. Defendant Fox Entertainment Group, LLC is a limited liability company with its principal place of business in New York County, New York, and is duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware. Fox Entertainment Group, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. In turn, Defendant Fox Television Stations, LLC and Fox News Network, LLC, are both wholly owned subsidiaries of Fox Entertainment Group, LLC. At all relevant times, Fox Entertainment Group, LLC has met the definition of an “employer” of Plaintiff under all applicable statutes. 19. Defendant Fox Television Stations, LLC is a limited liability company with its principal place of business in New York County, New York, and is duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware. At all relevant times, Fox Television Stations, LLC has met the definition of an “employer” of Plaintiff under all applicable statutes. 2 Although Fox uses the title “Freelancer” or “Freelance Reporter,” Plaintiff is, and is treated as, an employee. She is paid on a W-2 with deductions made from her compensation, accrues sick and vacation days and is not permitted to work for any other television stations. 6 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 7 of 28 20. Upon information and belief, Defendant Byron Harmon is a resident of the State of New York. Byron Harmon is the News Director at WNWY/Ch. 5. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS I. Ms. Curanaj Applies For a Position with Fox News Channel and Is Sexually Harassed By Roger Ailes 21. In or about February 2011, Ms. Curanaj met Roger Ailes at a dinner she attended with New York State Senator Gregory Ball. 22. Ailes took an immediate liking to Ms. Curanaj, and offered to bring her in for an interview for a position with FNC. Shortly thereafter, Ailes contacted Ms. Curanaj to schedule the interview, which ultimately took place in May 2011. 23. When Ms. Curanaj arrived at FNC’s New York City offices, she met with multiple FNC employees and executives, including Ailes and Bill Shine. 24. Initially, Ms. Curanaj met with these individuals in a group. However, following the group interview, Ailes invited Ms. Curanaj to “interview” with him privately. 25. During this private interview, Ailes insisted that Ms. Curanaj sit directly next to him on a couch in his office. 26. Ailes launched into a tirade about President Barack Obama, insisting that President Obama is a Muslim who had “ulterior motives” and was “working with the terrorists.” 27. Ailes then shifted the discussion to explain what he described as FNC’s “recipe for success.” Specifically, Ailes told Ms. Curanaj that he always made sure that the women on FNC were shown “from the feet up,” meaning that their legs would be visible to the television audience. Ailes stated that, for this reason, it is “important [for female talent] to look good from head to toe.” 7 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 8 of 28 28. Ailes then asked Ms. Curanaj to stand up and “turn around” so that he could “see [her] from behind.” This, of course, made Ms. Curanaj extremely uncomfortable, but, as requested, she stood up, quickly twirled around and sat back down. 29. Ailes leered at her and commented, “I like what I see.” 30. The interview went well and Ailes indicated to Ms. Curanaj that she would soon receive an offer of employment. Indeed, she believed that Ailes intended to hire her. 31. Following Ms. Curanaj’s private interview, Ailes reached out to Senator Ball, who had previously dated Ms. Curanaj. 32. Ailes did not ask Senator Ball about Ms. Curanaj’s professional talents, abilities or qualifications. 33. Instead, Ailes asked Senator Ball whether Ms. Curanaj “put out,” sexually. 34. To be clear, Ailes also asked Senator Ball, “how’s the sex,” in reference to Ms. Curanaj. 35. Senator Ball told Ailes that Ms. Curanaj was a “very nice girl,” implying that she would not “put out” for Ailes. Shortly thereafter, Ailes called Ms. Curanaj and told her that he did not believe she was “ready” for FNC and suggested that she reach out to Fox’s local stations instead. 36. Ms. Curanaj did not receive the position at FNC because Ailes determined that she would not submit to him sexually. Based on the temporal proximity between her private interview with Ailes, the call from Ailes to Senator Ball and Ailes’ subsequent decision to not hire her, it was clear to Ms. Curanaj that she was “not ready” for FNC because of Ailes discovery that she would be unwilling to submit to him, sexually. 8 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 9 of 28 37. Ailes never said that he was dissatisfied with her abilities or qualifications, nor did he suggest that this was the reason she was “not ready.” 38. Stunned by Mr. Ailes’ statement, and aware that he had asked Senator Ball about her sexual proclivities, Ms. Curanaj was unable to ask him any further questions and hung up quickly. II. Ms. Curanaj Is Hired By Fox5 and Subjected to Persistent Discrimination Throughout Her Employment 39. Ms. Curanaj began working for Fox as a General Assignment Reporter for Fox5 on November 2, 2011. 40. At the time, she was hired as a “Freelance Reporter,” instead of being hired as a permanent, full time employee. 41. Nonetheless, Ms. Curanaj was consistently scheduled to work four to five days per week. 42. Ms. Curanaj was a veteran of the television news industry, having previously worked for News 12 Westchester, WHNS TV – Fox Carolina and CBS as a reporter, anchor and network producer. During her five years at CBS, she was promoted four times. 43. Ms. Curanaj received numerous awards at these stations, including two Emmys, a first-place Associated Press award and two New York Press Club awards. 44. Thus, it is no surprise that Ms. Curanaj was immediately successful in her role at Fox5, and has continued to be extremely successful to this day. 45. Ms. Curanaj’s success and career progression at Fox5, however, has been undermined every step of the way by News Director Harmon, who was hired at Fox5 in 2012 and promoted to the position of News Director six months later. 9 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 10 of 28 46. Shortly thereafter, Ms. Curanaj – who is 38 years old – told Harmon that she wanted to be promoted to a full time position with a contract. 47. Although Harmon told Ms. Curanaj that she was “great” and “in the running” for a full time position, he proceeded to hire Liz Dahlem, who is eight years younger than Ms. Curanaj. In contrast to Ms. Curanaj’s six years of anchoring experience and five years at Fox5, Ms. Dahlem was hired to anchor after only a brief stint as a freelancer. 48. At all relevant times, Harmon knew exactly how old Ms. Curanaj was because he specifically asked her. 49. When Ms. Curanaj asked Harmon why she was not selected for a permanent position, he told her that full time employees have to be able to anchor, and that she was not “anchor material.” 50. This was, of course, absurd, given that Ms. Curanaj has significant anchoring experience. Ms. Curanaj explained this and asked to take an anchor test. 51. Although Harmon agreed, he never actually set up the test. After repeatedly requesting that the test be set up, it was finally scheduled by Emad Asghar (“Asghar”), Fox5’s Assistant News Director. At all relevant times, Asghar knew exactly how old Ms. Curanaj was because he also specifically asked her. A. “Not Attractive Enough” To Anchor 52. Ms. Curanaj performed very well during the anchor test, but when she asked Asghar what Harmon said about her performance, Asghar stated that while he knew that her performance was “great,” “it [was not] going to happen.” Meaning, Ms. Curanaj would not be permitted to anchor and, as a result, would not be hired as a permanent employee. 10 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 11 of 28 53. Ms. Curanaj then approached Harmon about this issue directly. Harmon told Ms. Curanaj that there was “no point” for him to even review her anchor test because he had already decided that she was not “anchor material.” 54. When pressed, Harmon told Ms. Curanaj that she was not “special” and “not attractive enough to be an anchor.” 55. Harmon told Ms. Curanaj that anchors must be “very attractive.” 56. Harmon’s decision not to permit Ms. Curanaj to anchor, and therefore not to hire her full time, because she is “not attractive enough,” is a transparent act of age and gender discrimination. 57. This decision reveals that Harmon’s decision-making at Fox5 is based not on skills and qualifications, but rather on his own biases and beliefs as to what women should look like. 58. Understandably, Ms. Curanaj was upset and offended by Harmon’s discriminatory statements, and asked him whether he thought she needed plastic surgery, and whether her nose was a problem for him. Specifically, Ms. Curanaj offered to undergo rhinoplasty, take voice lessons and meet with a professional makeup artist, in an attempt to have the chance to anchor. Harmon responded by merely shrugging his shoulders. 59. In addition to repeatedly expressing his belief that Ms. Curanaj is generally unattractive, Harmon often tells Ms. Curanaj that she “look[s] like shit” or that she “looks sick.” 60. Following one such occasion, Ms. Curanaj explained to Harmon that she has an illness very similar to lupus, and that the way he was scheduling her shifts was worsening the symptoms of her illness. 11 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 12 of 28 61. For instance, unlike her colleagues, Ms. Curanaj would often be scheduled to work an early morning shift on the days after she worked a late night shift. 62. Harmon “solved” this problem by simply cutting Ms. Curanaj’s shifts due to her 63. As a result, Ms. Curanaj often works only three days per week instead of four or 64. The decision to cut Ms. Curanaj’s shifts because of her illness is, of course, illness. five. unlawful. Ms. Curanaj could have been accommodated by being given a regular schedule, but no one ever engaged in the interactive process with her. B. Not “Young Enough” to Anchor 65. Since Ms. Curanaj joined Fox5, eight individuals have been hired or promoted to a full time position – Ms. Dahlem, Mac King, Allison Morris, Simone Boyce, Jennifer Lahmers, Zachery Keisch, Jessica Formoso and Joe Toohey. 66. Each of these individuals is younger than Ms. Curanaj; some are younger by a decade or more. Of the eight individuals, only Ms. Morris had experience as an anchor, and Mr. Toohey had never even worked as a reporter. 67. Many were never employed by Fox5 as a Freelancer, and those that were held that position for only a few months before being promoted. 68. Ms. Curanaj has continued to ask Harmon for a full time position, and has received various inconsistent explanations as to why she has been passed over in favor of these eight younger, and less experienced, individuals. 69. At times, Harmon has said that full time employees need anchoring experience in New York City. However, he hired someone younger than Ms. Curanaj, who had no New York 12 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 13 of 28 City anchoring experience. When asked about this, Harmon changed his answer to say that his full time hires needed “recent” anchoring experience. As set forth above, seven of the eight hires had no anchoring experience. 70. All the while, however, Harmon has consistently expressed his belief that Ms. Curanaj is not attractive enough to anchor. 71. Harmon failed to subject the male employees hired to anchor, including Mac King, Zachery Keisch and Joe Toohey, to the same standard of physical attractiveness as women employees, including Ms. Curanaj. 72. In fact, Harmon has treated other older women reporters who he finds unattractive in a similar fashion. 73. By way of example only, prior to Harmon assuming the role of News Director, Sharon Crowley was the main fill-in anchor on Fox5. Shortly after he was named News Director, Harmon removed Ms. Crowley, who is over 40, from this position and told her that she was “too old” to anchor and that she “look[ed] like a Midwestern soccer mom.” 74. As he does to Ms. Curanaj, in front of other employees, Harmon also openly tells Ms. Crowley that she “look[s] like shit” when he sees her without makeup. 75. Despite her repeated requests, Harmon will not permit Ms. Curanaj to anchor very brief “cut-ins,” which he allows virtually every other reporter to do. 76. Harmon also refuses to feature her in promotional videos and regularly fails to recognize or compliment her significant accomplishments. C. “Ms. Albania” 77. Harmon has made numerous offensive and discriminatory comments about Ms. Curanaj’s nationality. 13 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 14 of 28 78. He repeatedly and openly referred to Ms. Curanaj as “Ms. Albania.” 79. Incredulously, Harmon called her this without ever taking the time to find out that she is, in fact, from Montenegro. 80. He also asked Ms. Curanaj many times whether her family was connected with “the mob,” implying that Albanians, in general, engage in illegal business operations or operate outside the law. He told Ms. Curanaj that “Albanians love the mafia.” 81. Harmon also regularly expressed his belief to Ms. Curanaj that “all Albanians are doormen or criminals.” 82. Obviously, Harmon does not believe that Ms. Curanaj is capable of succeeding in a professional environment because he believed that she is Albanian – notwithstanding the fact that his bias and prejudice was more evident due to his apparent “confusion” between the two t Balkan countries. 83. Clearly, her nationality factored into Harmon’s denial of a promotion from freelancer to a full time position with a contract. Her national heritage worked to her detriment as Harmon used opportunities to reduce her hours (and thus her compensation). 84. Moreover, it is apparent that the fact that Ms. Curanaj is from Montenegro, and Harmon believed she was Albanian is, in part, why Harmon believes she is “not attractive enough” to anchor. 85. Ms. Curanaj told Harmon that his comments were offensive, and that her father worked very hard to become a property owner in America. Harmon expressed skepticism, saying “how is that possible,” and suggesting that Ms. Curanaj’s father could only have purchased property with the proceeds of criminal activity. 14 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 15 of 28 III. Ms. Curanaj Is Subjected to Egregious and Blatant Pregnancy Discrimination 86. In late July 2016, Ms. Curanaj informed Asghar that she was pregnant. 87. Asghar stated that he would inform Harmon. 88. Ms. Curanaj was already aware that Harmon harbored bias against women who became pregnant while working for him. 89. For example, when Ms. Curanaj got married in the summer of 2012, Harmon disparagingly and inappropriately commented, “now that you’re in your 30s and married, you’re going to start having babies.” 90. Among Fox5 management, negative attitudes about pregnancy and bias against women were openly expressed. By way of example only, opinions and comments were made in the newsroom that included, “after these young girls [are hired], they get married,” and “turn 30,” and start “wanting babies” and “cause problems.” 91. Harmon has a history of failing to promote women who become pregnant or whom he believes may want to start a family. 92. Since Ms. Curanaj joined as a Freelancer, she is one of only two Freelancers that have not been promoted to a full time position. Stacey Delikat is the other. 93. Earlier this year, when Ms. Delikat was pregnant, she asked Harmon to accommodate her by providing a set schedule when she returned from maternity leave. This request was denied. 94. Moreover, Ms. Curanaj has heard that, in reference to Ms. Delikat’s pregnancy, Harmon suggested that Ms. Delikat would rather “stay at home and spend time with [her] baby” than return to work. 15 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 16 of 28 95. It was also common knowledge in the newsroom that before Harmon promoted Teresa Priolo to a full time position, he warned her against getting pregnant by saying, “I hope you are not planning on getting pregnant anytime soon.” 96. After she disclosed her pregnancy, Ms. Curanaj requested a regular schedule upon her return from her anticipated maternity leave. 97. She has been told that the station “will not be able to accommodate [her] request,” and that she will not receive a set schedule when she comes back from maternity leave. Rather, it has been communicated her that she should call Fox5 after her pregnancy to see what can be “worked out.” 98. Moreover, after disclosing her pregnancy, Ms. Curanaj was called into Harmon’s office. Harmon, visibly furious, accused Ms. Curanaj of “talking shit” about him. He would not explain what Ms. Curanaj purportedly said or did. 99. Following disclosure of her pregnancy, Mr. Curanaj was taken off the weekend schedule at Fox5, which resulted in even fewer hours and less pay. Ms. Curanaj was told that this decision was made because of her pregnancy. Specifically, she was told by Asghar that if “something happened” to her on the weekend schedule, such as her having to go to the hospital, that he did not have a backup reporter to fill in. Although Ms. Curanaj assured Asghar that she was fine physically and not expecting to go into labor until her due date, he refused to return her to the weekend schedule. 100. Moreover, Fox5 has made no effort to find Ms. Curanaj additional shifts during the week to make up for her lost weekend shifts. 16 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 17 of 28 IV. Ms. Curanaj Puts Fox5 on Notice of Her Claims and Is Promptly Retaliated Against 101. On Tuesday, November 8, 2016, Ms. Curanaj, through counsel, put Fox5 on notice of her claims of unlawful discrimination. 102. Immediately following receipt of Ms. Curanaj’s complaints of unlawful discrimination, Fox5 began retaliating against her by significantly cutting her hours. 103. Since putting Fox5 on notice of her claims, Ms. Curanaj has often been scheduled to work only two days per week, less than ever before. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment in Violation of § 1981) Against All Defendants 104. Plaintiff hereby repeats, reiterates and re-alleges each and every allegation in each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 105. Defendants have discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of her race and/or ethnicity in violation of § 1981 by, inter alia, denying her a full time position, cutting her hours and subjecting her to a hostile work environment because of her race and ethnicity. 106. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of § 1981, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, monetary and/or economic harm for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 107. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of § 1981, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, mental anguish and emotional distress for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 108. Defendants’ unlawful and discriminatory actions constitute malicious, willful and wanton violations of § 1981, for which Plaintiff is entitled to an award of punitive damages. 17 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 18 of 28 SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Retaliation in Violation of § 1981) Against All Defendants 109. Plaintiff hereby repeats, reiterates and re-alleges each and every allegation in each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 110. Defendants have retaliated against Plaintiff on the basis of her protected complaints by, inter alia, cutting her hours even further. 111. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful retaliatory conduct in violation of § 1981, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, monetary and/or economic harm for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 112. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful retaliatory conduct in violation of § 1981, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, mental anguish and emotional distress for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 113. Defendants’ unlawful retaliatory actions constitute malicious, willful and wanton violations of § 1981, for which Plaintiff is entitled to an award of punitive damages. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (Race, Ethnicity and National Origin Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment in Violation of the NYSHRL) Against All Defendants 114. Plaintiff hereby repeats, reiterates and re-alleges each and every allegation in each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 115. Defendants have discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of her race, ethnicity and national origin in violation of the NYSHRL by, inter alia, denying her a full time position, cutting her hours and subjecting her to a hostile work environment because of her race, ethnicity and national origin. 18 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 19 of 28 116. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYSHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, monetary and/or economic harm for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 117. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYSHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, mental anguish and emotional distress for which she is entitled to an award of damages. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Age Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment in Violation of the NYSHRL) Against All Defendants 118. Plaintiff hereby repeats, reiterates and re-alleges each and every allegation in each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 119. Defendants have discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of her age in violation of the NYSHRL by, inter alia, denying her a full time position, cutting her hours and subjecting her to a hostile work environment because of her age. 120. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYSHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, monetary and/or economic harm for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 121. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYSHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, mental anguish and emotional distress for which she is entitled to an award of damages. FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Disability Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment in Violation of the NYSHRL) Against All Defendants 122. Plaintiff hereby repeats, reiterates and re-alleges each and every allegation in each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 19 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 20 of 28 123. Defendants have discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of her disability and/or perceived disability in violation of the NYSHRL by, inter alia, denying her a full time position, cutting her hours and subjecting her to a hostile work environment because of her disability and/or perceived disability. 124. Defendants have also discrimination against Plaintiff on the basis of her disability by failing to accommodate her. 125. Defendants have also discrimination against Plaintiff on the basis of her disability by failing to engage in the interactive process. 126. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYSHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, monetary and/or economic harm for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 127. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYSHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, mental anguish and emotional distress for which she is entitled to an award of damages. SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Gender Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment in Violation of the NYSHRL) Against All Defendants 128. Plaintiff hereby repeats, reiterates and re-alleges each and every allegation in each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 129. Defendants have discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of her gender in violation of the NYSHRL by, inter alia, denying her a full time position, cutting her hours and subjecting her to a hostile work environment because of her gender. 20 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 21 of 28 130. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYSHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, monetary and/or economic harm for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 131. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYSHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, mental anguish and emotional distress for which she is entitled to an award of damages. SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Pregnancy Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment in Violation of the NYSHRL) Against All Defendants 132. Plaintiff hereby repeats, reiterates and re-alleges each and every allegation in each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 133. Defendants have discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of her pregnancy in violation of the NYSHRL by, inter alia, denying her a full time position, cutting her hours and subjecting her to a hostile work environment because of her pregnancy. 134. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYSHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, monetary and/or economic harm for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 135. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYSHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, mental anguish and emotional distress for which she is entitled to an award of damages. EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Retaliation in Violation of the NYSHRL) Against All Defendants 136. Plaintiff hereby repeats, reiterates and re-alleges each and every allegation in each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 21 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 22 of 28 137. Defendants have retaliated against Plaintiff on the basis of her protected complaints by, inter alia, cutting her hours even further. 138. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful retaliatory conduct in violation of the NYSHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, monetary and/or economic harm for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 139. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful retaliatory conduct in violation of the NYSHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, mental anguish and emotional distress for which she is entitled to an award of damages. NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Race, Ethnicity and National Origin Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment in Violation of the NYCHRL) Against All Defendants 140. Plaintiff hereby repeats, reiterates and re-alleges each and every allegation in each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 141. Defendants have discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of her race, ethnicity and national origin in violation of the NYCHRL by, inter alia, denying her a full time position, cutting her hours and subjecting her to a hostile work environment because of her race, ethnicity and national origin. 142. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYCHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, monetary and/or economic harm for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 143. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYCHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, mental anguish and emotional distress for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 22 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 23 of 28 144. Defendants’ unlawful and discriminatory actions constitute malicious, willful and wanton violations of the NYCHRL, for which Plaintiff is entitled to an award of punitive damages. TENTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Age Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment in Violation of the NYCHRL) Against All Defendants 145. Plaintiff hereby repeats, reiterates and re-alleges each and every allegation in each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 146. Defendants have discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of her age in violation of the NYCHRL by, inter alia, denying her a full time position, cutting her hours and subjecting her to a hostile work environment because of her age. 147. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYCHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, monetary and/or economic harm for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 148. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYCHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, mental anguish and emotional distress for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 149. Defendants’ unlawful and discriminatory actions constitute malicious, willful and wanton violations of the NYCHRL, for which Plaintiff is entitled to an award of punitive damages. ELEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Disability Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment in Violation of the NYCHRL) Against All Defendants 150. Plaintiff hereby repeats, reiterates and re-alleges each and every allegation in each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 23 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 24 of 28 151. Defendants have discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of her disability and/or perceived disability in violation of the NYCHRL by, inter alia, denying her a full time position, cutting her hours and subjecting her to a hostile work environment because of her disability and/or perceived disability. 152. Defendants have also discrimination against Plaintiff on the basis of her disability by failing to accommodate her. 153. Defendants have also discrimination against Plaintiff on the basis of her disability by failing to engage in the interactive process. 154. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYCHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, monetary and/or economic harm for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 155. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYCHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, mental anguish and emotional distress for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 156. Defendants’ unlawful and discriminatory actions constitute malicious, willful and wanton violations of the NYCHRL, for which Plaintiff is entitled to an award of punitive damages. TWELFTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Gender Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment in Violation of the NYCHRL) Against All Defendants 157. Plaintiff hereby repeats, reiterates and re-alleges each and every allegation in each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 24 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 25 of 28 158. Defendants have discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of her gender in violation of the NYCHRL by, inter alia, denying her a full time position, cutting her hours and subjecting her to a hostile work environment because of her gender. 159. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYCHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, monetary and/or economic harm for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 160. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYCHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, mental anguish and emotional distress for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 161. Defendants’ unlawful and discriminatory actions constitute malicious, willful and wanton violations of the NYCHRL, for which Plaintiff is entitled to an award of punitive damages. THIRTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Gender Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment in Violation of the NYCHRL) Against All Defendants 162. Plaintiff hereby repeats, reiterates and re-alleges each and every allegation in each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 163. Defendants have discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of her gender in violation of the NYCHRL by, inter alia, denying her a full time position, cutting her hours and subjecting her to a hostile work environment because of her gender. 164. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYCHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, monetary and/or economic harm for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 25 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 26 of 28 165. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYCHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, mental anguish and emotional distress for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 166. Defendants’ unlawful and discriminatory actions constitute malicious, willful and wanton violations of the NYCHRL, for which Plaintiff is entitled to an award of punitive damages. FOURTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Retaliation in Violation of the NYCHRL) Against All Defendants 167. Plaintiff hereby repeats, reiterates and re-alleges each and every allegation in each of the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 168. Defendants have retaliated against Plaintiff on the basis of her protected complaints by, inter alia, cutting her hours even further. 169. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful retaliatory conduct in violation of the NYCHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, monetary and/or economic harm for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 170. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful retaliatory conduct in violation of the NYCHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, mental anguish and emotional distress for which she is entitled to an award of damages. 171. Defendants’ unlawful and discriminatory actions constitute malicious, willful and wanton violations of the NYCHRL, for which Plaintiff is entitled to an award of punitive damages. 26 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 27 of 28 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that the Court enter judgment in her favor and against Defendants, containing the following relief: A. A declaratory judgment that the actions, conduct and practices of Defendants complained of herein violate the laws of the United States and the State and City of New York; B. An award of damages in an amount to be determined at trial, plus prejudgment interest, to compensate Plaintiff for all monetary and/or economic damages; C. An award of damages in an amount to be determined at trial, plus prejudgment interest, to compensate Plaintiff for all non-monetary and/or compensatory damages, including, but not limited to, compensation for her mental anguish and emotional distress, humiliation, embarrassment, stress and anxiety, loss of self-esteem, self-confidence and personal dignity, and emotional pain and suffering and any other physical and mental injuries; D. An award of damages to be determined at trial, plus prejudgment interest, to compensate Plaintiff for harm to her professional and personal reputations and loss of career fulfillment; E. An award of punitive damages; F. An aware of liquidated damages; G. An award of costs that Plaintiff has incurred in this action, as well as Plaintiff’s reasonable attorneys’ fees to the fullest extent permitted by law; and H. Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. 27 Case 1:16-cv-09608 Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 28 of 28 JURY DEMAND Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues of fact and damages stated herein. Dated: December 13, 2016 New York, New York Respectfully submitted, WIGDOR LLP By: _____________________________ Douglas H. Wigdor Jeanne M. Christensen Michael J. Willemin 85 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10003 Telephone: (212) 257-6800 Facsimile: (212) 257-6845 dwigdor@wigdorlaw.com jchristensen@wigdorlaw.com mwillemin@wigdorlaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff 28