Case Document 274 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ABD AL-RAHIM HUSSAIN MOHAMMED AL-NASHIRI, Petitioner, v. Case No: BARACK OBAMA, et al., Respondents. ORDER Upon consideration of respondents? motion for partial reconsideration and clari?cation [270], petitioner?s opposition thereto, and the record herein, respondents? motion is hereby DENIED. There is no intervening change in the law, no new evidence not previously available, and no clear error in the Court?s prior Order. Moreover, the Court?s Order placing a copy of the Senate Report in the custody of the Court Information Security Of?ce does not authorize access to the Report. Before access is authorized, the Court would clearly be required to solicit the views of the Legislative Branch as well as the Executive Branch. The Court is obliged, however to protect petitioner?s possible right of access to the Report if the Court determines such access is necessary to the adjudication of this case. There is no basis for a stay [271] pending consideration of a possible appeal by the respondents, so the alternative motion for a stay is DENIED. The petitioner?s cross-motion [272] for immediate relief is also DENIED. Respondents are no doubt aware that this Court has had a contempt trial and found an agency in contempt Case Document 274 Filed 01/19/17 Page 2 of 2 when it destroyed an agency head?s hard drive the clay of a prior Inauguration. This Court is con?dent that respondents will not want a contempt trial here when the Court?s Order is clear. It is SO ORDERED. Date: January 2017 2? - Roy& C. Lamberth United States District Judge