082 Eric/unsung (0X6) From: Krauss. Becky Sent: Friday. February 08. 2013 11:37 AM To: (bxs) Cc: Subject: FW: meeting w/ Heather I From: Goidheim, David Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 5:40 PM To: Romig, AI Ce: Krauss. Becky; (0X6) Braithwaite, Karl Royden; (DXG) Subject: RE: meeting w/ Heather Let us know From: Romig, Al Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 5:36 PM To: Goldheim, David Cc: (DXG) Krauss, Becky; Braithwalte, Karl Royden; (axe) (bits) Subject: RE: meeting w/ Heather OK I see Heather tomorrow eve and will get her take al From: Goidheim, David Sent: Tusday. Mardt 31, 2009 5:00 PM To: Rornig, Cc: Krauss. Becky; Kart Royden: (0X6) Subject: mau meeong w/ Heather Al, . Becky and i had a very elleclive-meeting w/ Heather this PM. Her advice and insights are excellent. Essentially cur next - steps will be Imam (as well as individuals to beuavoided). Sandia and/or LM actionee. contact sequence and schedule. She suggested a number oi contacts including speaking w; (axe) to gain his insights. She also agreed to comment on Our written strategy (power point presentation) and continue working w/ us to support and retina the Strategy. This is the cliff notes version? (axe) is scheduling a time tor the 4 ol us to meet tor a more com . plate strate drscussron. gopeiuliy the week of 4/13 in oroer to prepare for our meeting w/ Judy and Wash Ops. 9y largo 083 Gibson, Anne From: Krauss. Becky Sent: Friday, February 08. 2013 11:38 AM To: Cc: Subject: FW: Notes trom our meeting w/ Heather From: Goidheim, David Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:56 AM To: Krauss, Becky CC: (OX6) . Subject: Notes from our meeting w/ Heather Becky. Attached are my notes (while still fresh in my mind) from our meeting w/ Heather yesterday. think they might be helpful as we meet w/ Al and subsequentiy w/ Judy and the Wash Ops team. Can you pis correct any errors and add your notes? ,Wm 084 OUO LIN/Sandia Competition Sensitive March 31. 2009 Meeting: Heather Wilson, Becky Krausa, David Goldheim Subject: Contract Strategy Hobson out and that is good from a congressional support for contract extension point of view. Sandia is better positioned than Los Alamos National Security for extension. Lockheed Martin shouid aggressively lobby Congress, but keep a low protiiee? How supportive is the New Mexico delegation tor a Lockheed Martin/Sandia contract extension? We need to meet with delegation. should let know (by direct contact) that he expects a contract extension and will toliow the matter with personal interest. (bile) stalt must speak with him about the +5 oi extension - work key lnlluencers/ Which Sandia Vice Presidents could in?uence key advisers? Point of Contact strategy. should speak with "friends and family timing will be important. Do we know any of (We) colleagues at LBL who would advocate for the Lockheed Martin/Sandia team - Mim? W6) could be a good source of insight. Check old DOE organization charts about who can help us - retirees. staii who have moved on. Focus on congressional allies. Avoid hard-over congressional believers In competition uber ailes. Avoid parochial interests Hobson-iike) who will use the New Mexico delegation's desire for extension as a bargaining chip for their personal agenda. OUO LM/Sandie Competition Sensitive "In/ff -, 085 - OUO LM/Sandia Competition Sensitive Ohio (Batteile) has lost a bit of clout in last 5 years. Congress is greatly segmented. lnfonnatlon is frequently not shared among members or even committee members, so don't worry about the strategy for contract extension spreading throughout Congress. Who in Lockheed Martin have relationships with and can influence chairs and members of key committees? White House advisory offices probably not players unless White House has a policy to compete all contracts. Meet with to seek his advice on strategy and request his help in getting and (We) and their colleagues to be assertive with the Department of Energy. expected to be neutral according to John Epstein. not a supporter oi Sandla according to John Epstein. Help from Paul Hommert or Mim? (We) ., also at Bipartisan Policy Center. can help with key staffers. 13 chief clerks in House on and Defense committees worked for should be contacted for advice and insights into means of influencing the National Nuclear Security Administration. Meet with Richardson and get him to call or Rahm Emanuel and assert the State's desire to keep the Lockheed Martin/Sandie team in place and extend the contract. (We) should be a good source of information regarding the National Nuclear Security Administration's sense of the value of the Lockheed Martin/Sandie team." Local politicians (Mayor and City Council) not malor lnfluencers since Lockheed Martin has a long standing and positive presence in New Mexico. Carefully plan the sequence of interactions and message to potential competitors to avoid them becoming pro active too early (Battelle. NG, etc). Carefully plan Chris Kubasik's and (We) interactions to be timely and strategic. Heather is enthusiastic about supporting our M80 Contract Strategy and will contribute whenever asked. OUO Lid/Sandie Competition Sensitive 086 (W6) From: Krauss. Becky Sent: Friday. February 08. 20t3 11 :57 AM To: Cc: (DXB) Subject: FW: Follow-Up on Fnom: Goidhelm, David Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 4:35 PM To: 'HAWilsonanlmm' Cc: Krauss, Becky; (DXB) Subject: RE: Follow-Up on From: HAWllsontalaoimm Sent: Wednesday. Apt" 01. 2009 4:06 PM Goldheim, David Cc: Krauss, Becky; (W5) Subject: Re: Follow-Up on use 0 ill give Steve Bell a call this week with a heads up. They are likely to meet with you and Altogether. Will let you know when I have connected with them. Bell's wife has been quite sick. so he has been out at the ottlce some. in a message dated 4/1/2009 2:51 :45 PM. Mountain Standard Time. WM writes: Heather, Thanks again tor you time today. Becky and I lound your recommendations quite insighttui and will use them as a basis tor discussions w/ Al in a week or so and with the LM Wash Ops team on April 20. Al and i will follow up w/ (DXS) and arrange to meet w/ him and also W5) I?ll try and loin him let both meetings as well as Becky to the extent we are able to coordinate calendars. Your offer to contact Steve Bell is accepted and we?ll plan to include a meeting w/ him at the same time as we are in DC for the others. Your suggestion about meeting w/ (0X6) is embarrassing because i didn't think of it. (We) worked In my organization tor a number oi years. until a year or so ago. as i led Sandia's tech transfer org and bolero assuming this Mao capture role. His approach to structuring network and affinity maps is just right and so i'll make the big trip downstairs to meat w/ him. Thanks again tor your advice. past. present and luture. We look iorward to working closely w/ you to develop and implement our strategy. David 087 From: HAWilsoneeoimm [mailtozHAWIlsoni?laoLoom] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:28 PM To: Goidhelm, David Cc: Krauss, Bedty Subject: Follow-Up on M810 It was great to meet with you yesterday. t. We checked on as we discussed. He is doing consulting work lor variety oi groups including and IDA. He eiso heeded up one oi the working groups on the Congressional Commission on Nuclear Posture. He is In London this week working on some test ban issue and will be back Friday. (DXG) was the guy who made the extension decision when it was last mode and could tell you how he believes this will work- intemally. His contact lniorrnation is: ill send him an email heads up this altemoon that you might be contacting him. While asking him to have cotlee when you are in Dc and picking his brain would work ior your purposes. it might be worth bringing (DXG) out to do a presentation as part at the WW st Sandie and talking to him on your issues In conjunction. it certainly sounds like he is doing some work that would be oi interest to a variety oi elements in the tabs. 2. MG) new contact lrtionnetion in DC is: 088 ll AI Romig asked to go talk to him to get his advice the next time he goes back to Washington. I think he would give you some insights. Hie 0th ol Stall. (buts) is with him at the Policy Cenler. (ll you went me to make this overture. I would be happy to do so.) 3. A: it happens. i had a meeting recently with (DXB) and some other: in his group. He did a very good engagement plan and senior decision maker talking pom lor another purpose ior Sandie. ll you are putting together I team to map out an engagement strategy tor your purposes. he might be helplui participant. He clearly underatande how this works. i look lorward to working with you. Heather Heather Wilson a Company LLC 9220 Guadalupe Trail. NW Albuquerque. NM 87114 T: 505-331-0178 . - - -c A u?c. .. - - .. .?Qe?ne-e - Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? W. Heather Wilson a Company LLC 9220 Guadalupe Trail. NW Albuquerque. NM 87114 T: 505-331-0178 Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? MW. 089 (bits) From: Krauss. Becky Sent: Friday. February 08. 2013 mm PM To: (bits) . Cc: Subiect: FW: (?list '0 Heather Wilson consulting services From: Goidheim, David Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 1:33 PM To: leSi . i Cc: Krauss, Seder (W5) Subject: RE: (bite) -a Heather Wilson consulting services These agreements are in place and active. In both cases (DXG) has reviewed our planned work against the existing and concluded that our planned work lite wit the existing SOWs (opinions below). As tar as PCs or PR9. i'ii leave that to you and (bile) Thanks tor the help. David . it. 3/2 3; From: (hits) a i; Sent: Moriday. April 06, 2009 9:46 AM To: mm, Badly 3: a: (bii?l Subject: Becky, The iollowlng are attached: P0 which is a P0 with a statement of work sufficiently broad enough to include within its scope the additional work. This PO is an order placed against an ordering agreement. P9 6912;]. The rate in the ordering agreement is per day (page 5. Allowable Charges). Thank you. (bii6) From: (W) Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 12:54 PM To: Krauss, Becky Cc: Goidheim, David (?list Subject: RE: Items for CPA Heather Wilson Becky, i believe that such a meeting is within the scope of the SOW and the current (April) task. (OX6) 090 This email containa Intormatton that is legally privileged, company-con?dential or propriemy. and/or otherwise exempt trom diacioaure under applicable law. ii you are not the Intended recipient. please do not read, copy. or use It. and do not disclosure It to others. Pleaae notify the sender or the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. From: Sent: Monday, April Q6, 2009 1:13 PM To: Goidhelm, David Carson, Theresa A Krauss. Body; Subject: M: 9. Heather Wilson consulting services David and W5) Are these agreements already in place? They are showing with a PR number not a PO. I would think that what you .want Is In alignment with the statement at work so we would needle lust add our project and task to these agreements. (W5) can you loiiow up, see it they have been placed is there a dollar limit, and price out both by the drink and it we put in ior about 10 days and a law trips. i currently have about In the for strategic initiatives. (bills) use project Thanks From: Goldhcim, David Sent-l To: Bedadel. Wendy a: Krausc. Bede; Subject: Heaths Wilson waiting swim As you know, ihave been In touch W5) and requested that he assist us In developing our LM/Sandla strategy the lglure oi the contract and he has agreedPThe amount oi time for which we will need his services is uncertain except Ior an initial 1-2 hr meeting at Sandie on April 17. I'm sure there will be loilow-on (additional meetinga at Sandie and work he will perform to prepare ior the meetings) but not sure of the amount. He lives in W5) and will drive down tor meetings. Sandie has a current Proieesional Service Agreement (attached) under which this work will tail. including a daily consulting rate. I am not certain how we typically handle budgets ior such work (pay tor than a lull day oi support. mileage expenses. etc). Also as we have discussed by email. we have the same need tor support trom Heather Wilson.l She also has a Protesslonai Services agreement w/ Sandie (attached below) under which this work will tell. Becky and i met w/ her last week tor a couple of hours and loilowlng our meeting she has been working on actions. As yet we' ve not discussed payment but i would expect we should pay for her time during our meeting and for work accomplished. I know budoets are tlaht and these are unplanned expenses ao please let me know how you think we should proceed-- (WB) and ~10 15ior Heather. on an annual basie including a trip or more to (best estimates have). Thanks. David File: P0 747550.pdf File: File: OverarchingSOWJtAWDOOt