Case 1:16-cv-01534-JEB Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 1 of 21 Case No. 1:16-cv-1534-JEB EXHIBIT 29 Case No. 1:16-cv-1534-JEB Case Document 6?43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 2 of DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS 0F ENGINEERS. OMAHA DISTRICT OAHE PROJECT 28563 POWERHOUSE ROAD PIERRE so 57501-6174 0F. April 22, 2016 Field Archeologists Ms. Fern Swenson Deputy State Historic Preservation Of?cer North Dakota Historical Society 612 East Boulevard Avenue, Heritage Center Bismarck, North Dakota 58505?0830 Dear Ms. Swenson, The US. Army Corps of Engineers, Oahe Project Of?ce, has received a request from Dakota Access, LLC to construct a pipeline crossing of the Missouri River in association with the proposed Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) project. As stated in the previous informational letter (dated 7/22/15), the proposed crossing is located in Section 10, Township 134 N, Range 79 West, Morton County and Section 1 1, Emmons County, North Dakota. Project Description The proposed activity will involve horizontal directional drill (HDD) construction which will pass the 30? pipeline under the Missouri River at a depth of 92? at this location (see Figures HDD construction for the Lake Oahe crossing will consist of an approximate 7500? bore with the excavation of two bore pits, approximately 10? deep; one entry (Morton County) and one exit (Emmons County). The following text from the Dakota Access cultural resources survey report describes the HDD process: An HDD crossing involves drilling a hole under the water body and installing a pre- fabricated pipe segment through the hole. The first step in an HDD is to drill a small diameter pilot hole from one side of the crossing to the other using a drill rig. As the pilot?hole progresses, segments of drill pipe are inserted into the hole to extend the length of the drill. The drill bit is steered and monitored throughout the process until the desired pilot hole had been completed. The pilot hole is then enlarged using several passes of successively larger reaming tools. Once reamed to a sufficient size, a pre? fabricated segment of pipe is attached to the drill string on the exit side of the hole and pulled back through the drill hole toward the drill rig. Depending on the substrate, drilling and pull back can last anywhere from a few days to a few weeks. (Landt McCord, 2016) Case Document 6?43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 3 of 21 Pipe will be placed along a designated ?stringing area? on the entry, or Morton County side of the project, prior to installation (see Figures 1, The following description, also from the Dakota Access cultural resources survey report, discusses the pipe stringing process: The pipeline stringing operation associated with the HDD at Lake Oahe will require additional temporary workspace (A WS) on the west side of Lake Oahe for assembly of the pipeline prior to the insertion of the fabricated pipeline segment through the hole prepared by the HDD. Mechanical side booms will be used to pick up each pipeline segment and align it with the previous segment to facilitate welding. The assembled pipeline will be suspended from temporary wooden structures that typically range from three to four feet above the ground surface. The stringing operation will generally COtiform t0 the ground surface and no trenching would occur within the pipe stringing AT WS, but minor grading and the removal of vegetation activities may be required to facilitate a safe and stable work area. (Landt McCord, 2016) Area of Potential Effect (APE) HDD construction at the Lake Oahe crossing will be con?ned to privately owned lands outside of federal property managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Oahe Project. No construction activities will take place on federal lands as part of this crossing (see Figures However, since the action of placing a pipeline under federal lands is a permitted activity, the HDD construction is considered a federal undertaking and thus subject to the terms of the Missouri River Programmatic Agreement and Section 106. Any construction activity related to the HDD installation is considered as part of this undertaking, regardless of land ownership. Hence, all bore pits, stringing areas, staging/temporary work areas and access routes, even though located outside the corps boundary, are subject to review as part of this action. The APE for this project will not include construction for any portion of the pipeline alignment that extends past the bore pit locations (with the exception of those portions of the alignment identified as access routes or staging/temporary work areas). Potential ground disturbances for this construction activity are as follows: Entry and Exit Bore Pits; excavation to a depth of approximately 10? using excavators and other heavy construction equipment (see Figures - HDD bore and pipe installation under the Missouri River (see Figures the following information regarding the potential effect of vibration on sites or features in the vicinity of the bore is from the draft Environmental Assessment produced by Dakota Access (2015). The impacts attributable to the HDD would not be significant. Vibrations produced during the HDD process are not of a magnitude that would cause any impacts to geologic features or other resources. Any vibrations associated with the drilling process would be limited to the immediate vicinity of the drilling equipment on the surface and downhole. The vibrations produced from the downhole tooling are of a very low magnitude and are Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 4 of 21 attenuated very quickly by the formation such that vibrations are not felt at the surface. A vibration monitoring analysis conducted by GeoEngineers in 2009 found that peak particle velocities were less than 0.07 inches/second within approximately 50 feet of HDD operations. These velocities are well below that which would cause any structural impacts and moreover, the recorded vibrations were, in fact, imperceptible to human senses (GeoEngineers, 2009). Stringing Areas, Access Routes; minimal surface disturbances from mostly due to passage of vehicles and construction equipment necessary for ?stringing? and assembling the pipe. A few discreet areas along the route may exceed 12? or more as needed to make the route passable and set up the wooden pipe cradles across the rougher sections of terrain (see Figures Construction access on the Morton County side will follow the established stringing area in from Highway 1806 (see map). Construction access to the Emmons County construction area will follow the pipeline ROW in from Highway 1804 (see Figures 3-5). Temporary Work Areas; used for temporary stockpiling of pipe and equipment; minimal surface disturbances of These areas are adjacent to the bore pit and stringing area locations (see Figures Cultural Resource Identi?cation A review of USACE and cultural ?les and associated cultural resource reports indicated ?ve recorded cultural sites within the project APE (see Figures 3-7). Site Number Site Name Site Type NR Status Thomas Short Site Historic Farmstead Unevaluated 32MOX0570 Isolated Lithic Flake Not Eligible Artifact Scatter Unevaluated Wounded Knee Site Artifact Scatter Unevaluated Gayton Post Of?ce/ Store Historic Post Of?ce Unevaluated These sites are included in the project APE due to their position in relation to the project corridor. They are not in the construction zone due to HDD passing the pipeline well beneath any potential cultural strata. Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 5 of 21 These sites are included in the project APE primarily due to the size of the old legal locations (1/4 section or larger) as originally recorded. The actual site locations are not accurately known, but no evidence of them has been found within the APE. For example, 32MOX0004 is a location based on some sort of questionnaire from the 1930?s which reported a prehistoric artifact scatter somewhere in that general area. Since it has never been relocated, the original, large scale location remains in the records. In the case of 32EM0221, no updated location has been reported since the original site location was made. The following sites are recorded OUTSIDE the project area, but within a one-mile radius (see Figure 1). Site Number Site Name Site Tvpe NR Status 32M00257 Stone Circle/ Cairn Unevaluated 32M00258 Prehistoric Artifact Scatter Unevaluated 32M00256 Busia Site Stone Circle/ Cairn Unevaluated 32MOX0177 Prehistoric Isolated Find Not Eligible 32M00082 Stone Circle Unevaluated 32MOX0179 Prehistoric Isolated Find Not Eligible 32M0025 9 Cannonball Ridge Prehistoric Artifact Scatter Unevaluated 32M000130 Prehistoric Artifact Scatter Not Eligible 32M01098 Historic Roadbed Unevaluated 32MOX0006 Cannonball Post Of?ce Historic Site Lead Unevaluated 32M001081 Historic Artifact Scatter Unevaluated 32MOX0401 Isolated Artifact Scatter Not Eligible 32MOX0176 Isolated Artifact Scatter Not Eligible New Site NDMOI Galpin Cemetery Cemetery/Burial Unevaluated *New site, has not yet been ?led with 32MOX0180 Isolated Artifact Scatter Not Eligible 32MOX0181 Isolated Artifact Scatter Not Eligible Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 6 of 21 Site Number Site Name Site Type NR Status 32M00001 Cannonball Village Prehistoric Village Unevaluated 32M00054 Donahue Homestead Historic Homestead Unevaluated 32M00061 Prehistoric Artifact Scatter Unevaluated 3 2EMX01 5 9 Burial Unevaluated 32EM0133 Historic Homestead Unevaluated 32EM0094 Prehistoric Artifact Scatter Unevaluated 32EMX0071 Prehistoric Isolated Find Not Eligible 32EMX0072 Prehistoric Isolated Find Not Eligible 32EM0019 Prehistoric Artifact Scatter Unevaluated 32EMX1429 Isolated Artifact Scatter Not Eligible 32EM0172 Historic Foundation Unevaluated 32EMX0059 Prehistoric Site Lead Unevaluated 32EMX0060 Fort Bouis Fur Post Historic Site Lead Unevaluated 32EMX1413 Isolated Artifact Scatter Not Eligible 32EMX1414 Isolated Artifact Scatter Not Eligible 32EM0020 Prehistoric Artifact Scatter Unevaluated 32EMX1389 Prehistoric Site Lead Unevaluated 32EMX1442 Prehistoric Site Lead Unevaluated 32EMX1353 School Foundation Historic Lead Unevaluated 32EMX1430 Prehistoric Isolated Find Not Eligible The APE for this project (private lands outside of USACE boundaries) was most recently surveyed by Merjent, Inc. in 2014. Subsequent versions of the resulting cultural resources survey report were produced by Merjent (Sather, et a1, October 2015) and Alpine Archaeological Consultants, Inc. in coordination with Gray Pape, Inc. (Landt McCord, March 2016). Survey coverage for this effort included a 100? wide corridor along the stringng area and a 400? wide corridor for the remainder of the project area (see Figures One new cultural site was Case Document 6?43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 7 of 21 recorded during a shovel test, 32M0x00570. This ?nd consisted of a single lithic ?ake. Eight subsurface shovel tests, each approximately 30 cm diameter, at and surrounding the ?nd, were all negative. Merjent recommended a ?Not Eligible? determination for this site. No previously recorded sites were found to be within the survey corridor associated with this action. Based on this information and the fact that all surface construction activity is planned to occur outside of USACE managed lands, Merjent recommended a ?nding of ?No Historic PrOperties Subject to Effect?. USACE managed lands within the project area Were most recently surveyed by SWCA Environmental Consultants in 2009. N0 new, or previously recorded cultural sites were found/relocated within the preject area (luring this survey (Slessman 2010). The area was also surveyed by Larson-Tibesar ASSOCiates in 1983 (east side) and 1984 (west side) (Larson 1986 1987, respectively). This Was the ?rst and most comprehensive survey of USACE lands; most of the sites in this area Were identi?ed and recorded during this survey. The University of North Dakota (UND) also conducted surveys here in the 1980-83 timefrarne associated with the Northern Border Pipeline (NBP) (Root Gregg, 1983). Since the pr0posed DAPL project is planned to closely parallel the Northern Border line at the crossing, the UND work is particularly important and useful for this project review. UND conducted an initial pedestrian survey of the NBP ROW and then returned to selected sites (those that they felt may have been eligible) to conduct testing and evaluation. Among those sites evaluated were the Donahue-Leach Homestead Site (32M00054), Thomas Short Site (32EM0060), and the Wounded Knee Site (32EM0021). The Wounded Knee site (not to be confused with the massacre site of the same name), 32EM0021 received a fair degree of testing by UND in 1981 as part of the NBP project. The site boundaries (both horizontal and vertical) were well de?ned by a series of one hundred and ten, 7? diameter auger tests (to 900mbs), ?ve excavation units (two and three 2x2m) and four bank pro?les (2m long). Bank pro?les were extended down to a depth of 250cmbs. As a result of this work, Woodland period components were identi?ed in strata ranging from 40cmbs down to a maximum depth of 900mbs. Artifacts representing later occupations were also recovered in the 0?3 Ocmbs range. While most, if not all of the upper component of this site has been impacted by cultivation and construction of the NBP, a portion of the site containing elements of the woodland occupation remains undisturbed on southern end of the site area. UND has recommended this remnant of 32EM0021 as eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Site 32EM0019 is a prehistoric artifact scatter located north of site 32EM0021 and outside of the project APE on the east side of the river (see Figure 6). UND found this site to have no remaining subsurface context due to cultivation. No additional testing took place on this site. Neither 32EM0019 nor 32EM0021 were relocated during the recent SWCA survey. 32EM0019 is currently listed as ?unevaluated?. Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 8 of 21 In the Management Summary for the NBP work, author Matthew Root stated, ?Those portions of sites within easements are assumed to have been substantially impacted, or completely destroyed unless documented otherwise? (1983). This seems to de?nitely be the case with site 32M0006l which was directly in the NBP route on the west side. 32M00054 was heavily impacted, although there is evidence that some portion of this site remains, just outside of the easement ROW (see Figure 7). UND recommended that the historic sites (32M00054 and 60) were eligible for listing based on their association with the Cannonball Ranch. No of?cial determination of eligibility as been made for these sites. As a result, they are both currently listed as ?unevaluated?. Section 106 Consultation Solicitation for consultation and comment for the DAPL Oahe Crossing Project was initiated in an information letter dated 22 July, 2015. During the following comment period, the Oahe Project Of?ce received formal response letters from the Cheyenne River Sioux THPO, Steven Vance (17 August, 2015), SRST THPO, Waste Win Young (21 August, 2015) and Claudia Berg (28 August, 2015). Mr. Vance expressed his support of SRST in regards to the project and commented in support of earlier concerns voiced by SRST, such as the lack of tribal participation in identi?cation efforts and the potential for disturbing burials. He also recommended that we offer the opportunity for tribal visits to the project area. SRST comments addressed the potential for the project to impact a number of sites; 32MOX0570, 32MOX0004, 32M00259, 32EM0221, 32EM0019, 32EM0021 and questioned the eligibility listings for a number of others. SRST also requested tribal monitoring of all work and speci?cally that construction monitoring was necessary for both 32M00259 and 32EM0021. They also recommended a ?full TCP and archaeological Class 111 Cultural Resource survey? (Young, 2015). indicated their desire to consult and reiterated an earlier statement (regarding the DAPL survey report) deferring concurrence on site eligibility and determination of effect. They also had concerns with potential effects to sites near the project APE. In addition to those comments received in response to Section 106 consultation, many other comments were submitted to USACE as part of the Environmental Assessment for this project and in resPonse to the Regulatory actions associated with the rest of the pipeline project. While some of these comments overlapped those made in direct response to the cultural resources review, the majority concerned larger issues, often related to the pipeline project as a whole and were beyond the scope of the Oahe crossing action. As such, these comments are not addressed in this effort. Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 9 of 21 In order to address a number of comments ?rsthand, on-site visits to the project APE were arranged with cultural resource personnel from the of?ces of the North Dakota State Historic Preservation Of?ce and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe (SRST). Oahe Project archaeologists conducted a site visit with on 9/28/15. The APE on both sides of the river was inspected. No cultural materials were observed during the visit and all previous comments/questions from were resolved (Putz-Meier, personal communication 4/18/2016). Site visits were conducted with cultural resources personnel from the SRST on 3/7/16 (west side) and 3/22/16 (east side). During the March 7th visit, the group relocated two nearby sites (32M00054 and 32M00001) and also visited a historic cemetery (Galpin) near the site of the historic Cannonball Ranch. After this visit, the SRST provided this of?ce with information regarding areas/sites in the vicinity of the project that they had recorded (Brave Bull Allard, 2016). All of the sites mentioned in this report are located outside of the planned areas of disturbance for this project. During the March 22nd visit to the east side of the project, a large glacial erratic was identi?ed as an item of cultural importance. This large boulder is located outside of the temporary work space and any area of disturbance. A Knife River Flint (KRF) ?ake, Tongue River Silici?ed Sediment (TRSS) core and ?re cracked rock (FCR) fragments were also found near the current boundaries of recorded site 32EM0021. These items were within the portion of the site previously destroyed by the NBP and below the planned area of disturbance for the DAPL bore pit. A single KRF knife fragment was also found in a separate location outside of the planned ROW (see Figure 6). Determination of Effect During the intervening space of time since the beginning of the informational comment period on July 22, 2015, numerous phone calls, emails, meetings and site visits to the project area have taken place. While not all of the existing issues with the DAPL project have been solved, many of the questions regarding speci?c issues that apply to cultural resource impacts within the APE and scope of this crossing project have been addressed. Site location/condition and APE questions have been clari?ed and discussed during the aforementioned site visits and additional information was collected and analyzed. Recent and historic survey data and ?ndings were examined and discussed as well. The fact that all of the USACE managed lands will avoid impacts due major contributing factor to this determination of effect. The comprehensive nature of the effort, along with supporting information from later surveys, works in combination with the basically unchanged nature of the terrain in the crossing area to lend a high degree of con?dence to both, the location of sites as recorded and the lack of undiscovered sites nearby. Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 10 of 21 As a result, we concur with the ?ndings and recommendations of the Dakota Access/Oahe Crossing cultural resource survey report in regards to site 32M0x0570 (Landt McChord, ?nal version, March 2016); this site is determined ?Not Eligible? for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. We also concur with the recommendation of ?No Historic Properties Subject to Effect? for the actions associated with the Oahe crossing of the Dakota Access Pipeline. However, given the proximity of a number of these sites to HDD construction areas on both sides of the river, this of?ce will require noti?cation prior to the start of ground disturbing actions associated with this permit. Suf?cient lead time of at least ?ve (5) business days will be required in order to schedule personnel so that archeological monitoring of activities may take place. With this being the case, we anticipate your concurrence with our ?Not Eligible? and ?No Historic Properties Affected" determinations. Please respond in writing within 30 days receipt of this letter. If you have additional comments or concerns with this project, please contact me at (605) 945-3406 or via email at Richard Sr. Field Archaeologist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Oahe Project References Cited Brave Bull Allard, LaDonna 2016 Section 106 Coordinator Report, March 7, 2016, Cannonball Ranch. Provided via email to David Cain, USACE, March16, 2016. Copy archived, Oahe Project, Cultural Resource project ?les, Pierre, SD. Dakota Access 2015 Draft Environmental Assessment, Dakota Access Pipeline Project Crossings of lowage Easements and Federal Lands. Dakota Access, LLC, Houston, TX GeoEngineers 2009 Vibration Monitoring Report, Bridgewood 22?Inch-Diameter Class Change, Merrilville, Indiana. GeoEngineers, Seattle WA. Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 11 of 21 2014 Preliminary Geology and Geologic Hazards Evaluation, ETC Dakota Access Pipeline, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, Illinois. GeoEngineers, Seattle WA. Holst, David W. 2007 Corps of Engineers Missouri River Cultural Resources Baseline Monitoring for Lewis and Clark Lake, Lake Francis Case, Lake Sharpe and Lake Oahe. South Dakota State Historical Research Center, Rapid City, SD. Jackson, Michael A., Dennis L. Toom and Nathan J. Rokke. 2012 Northern Emmons County Phase 3 Class Cultural Resources Inventories, South Central Regional Water District, 201] Emmons, Logan, and McIntosh Counties, North Dakota. University of North Dakota Anthropology Research. Prepared for Bartlett West Engineers, Inc. Bismarck, ND. Larson, Thomas, Kurt Schweigert and Keith H. Dueholm Et A1. 1986 A Cultural Resource Inventory of the Left Bank of Lake Oahe: Burleigh and Emmons Counties, North Dakota. Larson-Tibesar Associates Laramie, WY. Larson, Thomas, Kurt Schweigert and Keith H. Dueholm Et A1. 1987 A Cultural Resource Inventory ofthe Right Bank ofLake Oahe in Morton and Sioux Counties North Dakota. Larson-Tibesar Associates Laramie, WY. LeBeau, Sebastian 2004 Cultural Resources Management Plan, Lake Oahe, South Dakota. Pahin Hunkankan, Eagle Butte, S.D. Olson, Byron, Tim Mentz, Waste? Win Young, et al. 2006 Traditional Property Inventory and Survey on the US. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District?s: Taken Area Along the Missouri River Within the Exterior Bounds of the Standing Rock Sioux Indian Reservation. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, Tribal Historic Preservation Of?ce, Ft. Yates, ND. Putz, Paul 2016 Personal communication (telephone call) with Megan Maier, USACE, April 18, 2016. Copy archived, Oahe Project, Cultural Resource project ?les, Pierre, SD. Root, Matthew J. and Michael L. Gregg 1983 Archaeology of the Northern Border Pipeline, North Dakota; Survey and Background Information. University of North Dakota, Grand Forks. Slessman, Scott, Vanesa Zietz, Zonna Barnes, et a1. 2010 A Cultural Resources Inventory of US. Army Corps of Engineers Managed Lands on Lake Oahe, Burleigh, Morton, Emmons and Sioux Counties, North Dakota. SWCA Consultants Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 12 of 21 Young, Waste? Win 2015 Letter to Cake Project archaeologist in response to proposed soil bore testing of the DAPL Oahe crossing. February 18, 2015. Copy archived, Oahe Project, Cultural Resource project ?les, Pierre, SD. Enclosures: Figure 1. Project Area Overview Topo Map with 1-mile cultural resourCe radius. Figure 2. Project Area Aerial Map with cultural resources. Figure 3. Project Area Aerial Map, West side detail. Figure 4. Project Area Aerial Map, East side detail. Figure 5. Project Area Aerial Map, West side APE detail. Figure 6. Project Area Aerial Map, East side APE detail. Figure 7. Project Area Aerial Map, West side APE detail, large scale. Figure 8. General Project Location Map. Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 13 of 21 Figure 1 ?32 A Pipeline ROW and Access Route Area on Aerial Image I 1 1 LEGEND .. - I ActionlConnected Action Area 1-mile Buffer - I - - DAPL Centerline Begin I . -. . Project Workspace on; . ne ROW and Assess Route ?1 . Bore P't Locat'on 353' *3 HDD . a USACE Managed Lands h, I, Resources within1 Mile . 3N . - . 7,,ry- - 2' smoke-0e i - . 2. millennium Kv-gzmoihist - _l - -- Isolated Find Location - ?Site Location I _e - . r, .1 *ActionlConnectedAction Area illustrated I . . .. . SEMOXMN - - on companion detail ?gures500 1000 Meters 1500 3000 Feet .. El . DAPL Pipeline Project Resources within 1 Mile, Lake Oahe Crossing Ll?IfDAKOTA ACCESSUSGS 7.5' Quadrangle USGS 64Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 14 of 21 FigureZ 32EM00094 32EM0221 1? azmexm 76 32EM00019 '1 I it} Begin HDD End HDD 1 ?At, ., I SZMGUZSQ A. 'l - ActionIConnected Action Area 1-mile Buffer . DAPL Centerline . Project Workspace -. . Bore Pit Location . HDD . 32MX0180 - gt USACE Managed Lands - I - - . Resources within 1 mile . 1 ?t . 11?. I . ?1 132MGDOS4 A Isolated Find Location . Site Location . g: . 32EM00112 . 32 32M?000m I 0 500 Meters . . - 0 2000 Feet DAPL Pipeline Project Resources within 1 Mile, Detail of Lake Oahe Crossing DAKOTA ACCESS, LLC 9 Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 15 of 21 SEME) szmexosro Slit-?92101 BO 32MGD-DCIB1 azmeom amounum 32MBX181 Figure 3 ActionlConnected Action Area 1-mile Buffer Project Workspace DAPL Centerline . Bore Pit Location -- - - - HDD r] USACE Managed Lands DAPL Class II and Ill Survey Previous Survey Resources within 1 mile A Isolated Find Location Site Location DAPL Pipeline Project Resources within 1 Mile, Detail of Lake Oahe Crossing West Side DAKOTA ACCESS, LLC 32EMX0059 Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 16 of 21 1 7'2 32E M00010 BEEMGBZU 0' 32EMX-1430 Action/Connected Action Area 1-mile Buffer GI Project Workspace DAPL Centerline . Bore Pit Location - - - - - HDD USACE Managed Lands DAPL Class II and Ill Survey Previous Survey Resources within 1 mile A Isolated Find Location Site Location 300 Meters 1000 Feel DAPL Pipeline Project Resources within 1 Mile, Detail of Lake Oahe Crossing East Side DAKOTA ACCESS, LLC Figure 5 Legend HDD Bore Pit DAPL workspace! Stringing Area Cultural Resources HDD Crossing Northern Boarder existing pipeline DAPL Centerline COE approx boundary Dbololmon Tho Unlorl sum govornrnoni ond USAGE i?urnhhoo null dolo Ind iho rodplont locopu Ind uno Ibo ho! {ho powrnmoni moi!? no or Impllod, tho neuron]. oomplolonm, nlobllb]. or [or my ponlculorpurpou nl lho InbrmIUon Ind duh furnilhod Tho Unllod Slot: ohll bl undor no llobilIy wlutlovorlo any porun by rollon oi my on mldo Ihoroul' Doro dloplayod on [his mop oro opprexlmollono hyoro Ina ohnuld not ho and In pilo- of sunny dor- nrlun-I ind ?eld archaeologist Prod u?a By mogon rnllor Proaunlon Doro US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District . Emma-mm onh linker-DAPL DAPL Iprl_2015 mild :arm :01 I Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 17 of 21 ragment . KRF Knife Large Boulder Figure 6 Legend HDD Bore Pit DAPL workspace! Stringing Area Cultural Resources HDD Crossing Northern Boarder existing pipeline DAPL Centerline COE approx boundary 0 Cultural items found ?eld visit March 22 Tin Unhd Slam: govunmcm Ind USAGE lumhhu lhl?l Ind the Iccopn Ind um [he ?pru- am [hi gov-mutant Inlltu nu ?pr-sud. should not bu used In pllu ol aurvry dull ar log-l ind ?eld archaeologist CENWO-OD-OA .. wnmli mu In . - US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District dint-DAPL DAPL Iprl_201E l'l'lld Snums: 2014 NAIP Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 18 of 21 Figure 7 Legend HDD Bore Pit DAPL workspace! Stringing Area Cultural Resources HDD Crossing Northern Boarder existing pipeline DAPL Centerline COE approx boundary Th- Unlld 5m" and USAGE lumhhn thII um Ind ?u locum Ind un: nw?h lho "pru- Ihll lhI guvornmonl no warrlnuu. "pr-Ind, ur In. Iccurlcy. comm-?nun or lull- [or any purposl of m. and in Tho Unlud Ihll b- ond-r no any person by noun a! Irvy on mod. mum Dun dhplaynd on this d-mu lrom GIS ivorl Ind Ihnu d bl mod In pllu of lurVIy rim or Ilgll ?unplan- ?eld archaeologist CENWO-ODOA men-{mm .. 20Apr1? US Army Corps of Engineers I. - Omaha DistriCt Him?nh?lbnha arm dlkomDAPL DAPL Iprl_2018 mud Snurnl: 2014 NAIP hnapwy Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 19 of 21 General Project Location Case Document 6-43 Flled 08/04/16 Page 20 of 21 Lake Oahe 1 Sheet Index Map 7 i ll *1 I 1 2.. EURLEIGH 51 Him-mu rev?B . 5 an?" . LT ukujihnf. Juli-.(1-1?er- 4':th . Brien->9 'E?Ih?f?l'n [9:33 1? 1 mnutie 'll . II- m: I - fill-i E?h Egu? lung 5DAPL West Slde Ln-mw I - .fl'l'l . ?Illi??l LOGAN ,AUBurnsw project area DAPL East side =2qu . ?3 31mm!? mum-05H 7' . -. n} BE that," {i - .1 *?nnm@1912 r? . :1 - - ?niI- .1 Hannah . .. :CAMPBELL .. .E- a K: DAR nmw?n??VZ; 3? i rialH-?tsnew uE-vr "1 fa" - H's-l I I. n-rffrsub-m1. 5m - - tensor: . - - . mam? patent-tug RIVER PW RESERVATKZN HYDE flat?! 1142/? .H sumr I?dmlu ?lm-turr? hang? STANLEY TE. - If. '1 is 341] A 0? Hajj? W9 HUGHES 1 . 1 Inn" tut-ma ?dfd\ 1D 0 10 20 Miles 7. Operations/Regulatory GIS Unit 2003 Lake Oahe Boating and Recreation Guide. US. Anny Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, Omaha. Case Document 6-43 Filed 08/04/16 Page 21 of 21 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR THE OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE MISSOUR RIVER MAINSTEM SYSTEM Excel sheet updated March 11. 2016 {Price} Barman: Count Last Name Organization Pre?x Name Title I Nelson Advrsory Council for Historic Preservation r. Reid Director, Of?ce of Federal 2 Lusher Advisory Cormcil for Historic Preservation r. Brian Program Analyst 3 Sta?m Asiniboine and Sioux Tribes of Fort Peck Mr. AT "Rustv" Chairman 4 Youpee Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of Fort Peck Mr. Curley Director. Cultural Resources Department 5 Barnes Blackfeet Tribe Mr. Harry Chairman 6 Murrav Blackfeet Tribe Mr. John Tribal Historic Preservation Of?cer 7 [aPointe Bureau of Indian Affairs Mr. Timothy Regional Director 8 Murdv Bureau of Indian Affairs Dr. Carson Regional Archaeologist 9 Vance Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Mr. Steven Tribal Historic Preservation O?ioer 10 Petersen Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Ms. Donna Rae Cultural Preservation Of?ce 1 Uses the Knife Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Mr. Raymond Tribal Council 12 Frazier Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Mr. Harold Chairman I 3 St. Marks Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boys' Reservation Mr. Ken Acting Chairman 14 Zephier Crow Creek Sioux Tribe Mr. Darrell Tribal Historic Preservation Of?cer 15 Sazue Crow Creek Sioux Tribe Ms. Roxanne Chairperson l6 Pease Crow Creek SiOux Tribe Mr. Leonard Vice Chairman 1 7 Old Covote Crow Nation Mr. Dar-in Chairman 18 Bull Chief Crow Nation Mr Emerson Tribal Historic Preservation Officer I 9 St. Claire, Jr. Eastern Shoshone Tribe Mr. Darwin Chairman 20 Reida' F1andreau Santee Sioux Tribe Mr. Anthony President 21 Kills A Hundred Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe Mr. Garrie Tribal Historic Preservation Of?cer Fort Belknap Indian Community 22 Azure Gros Ventre and Assiniboine Tribes Mr. Mark F. President 23 Wright bower Bmle Sioux Tribe Mr. Kevin Chairman 24 Jones bower Brute Sioux Tribe Mr. Scott Cultural Preservation Of?ce 25 Green Lower Bmle Sioux Tribe Ms Clair S. Public Relations/Cultural Preservatation Of?ce 26 Crows Breast Mandan, Hidatsa Ankara Nation Mr. Elgin Tribal Historic Preservation Of?cer 27 Fox Mandan. Hidatsa Ar?