$9 It. 1.x, V111 if 5' $11,115:? whom SUPERIOR comm: OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON t. 1111?.? 1? AND FOR THE COUNTY OF In re the Muf- 091383;: No. 2 'l .1 11 FINDINGS or new, Petitioner, (?11,11 CONCLUSIONS or mm 41:: :31" ORDER and 1311?.? 1 1111151,? 1? (SEALED FILE) a u: "3.31.1 1152 1% Respondent . 1., {in ?111, -. llU;.- ?31! THIS MATTER having come on for hearing before the Honorable - I cube of Q?s" judges of the above- ~refexenced court, on motion of Respondent of 217;"; residential contact between Respondent, and the daughter or the mum?11:1 1211:1119. being 1- g? based on the affidavits of. the parties and witnesseh 1and: 11 full xii}. ?yo?tA. oral testimony of expert witnesses herein,- the beerig 1. Atom; mt comenced on the - and having been opmp eted on the - - I - the Court having the declarations and affidavits submitted by the parties herein930m - 1 2W9 having reviewed the pleadings, orders, and documents on file in this roceeding, and having heard and considered the testimony of the varions?-gf called by the parties herein, and having heard and considered arguments of counsel; Petitioner having filed a motion for reconeideratien which was heard by the Court but reconsideration as {aw ?Lers the following: i'ue??fi? ?18.55:? 4.335 5 Eggs" 1415:. FINDINGS or? FACT . Both parties are (?11de and a ?nll times relevant to this pro- :3 and more recently needing have been, resi? of; 1.371" Washington" 21.. (m On the -, the mnr?iinge batizzen the above- 51/ referenced parties was dissolved by of Brisoluivion entered in this court. Said Decree adopted and incarnnreted??g reference 4 a Permanent Parenting Plan which provides that 5-- NH born the minor child of the part if}? sh?l? reside primarily with Petitioner, but wil?bhave and significant residential time with Respondent, additionally will have residential time with Respondent's parents I when Respondent is out of the area. This matter came before Immune or PACE. 01? In?! um - 2 1 he Court on temporary motion, regarding visitation. No ?ction for ?we any] 2 edification of the ?riginal Parenting Plan has been filed to date. -oth, to the parties' minor child. 16 to present . 17 1e: father to (J75 CAfldr?mm 13 .134! 43'" 7t 19 64::in wwr? I, 20 - - conducted a Pa?giatric conclusion 23 'the probability of - having been sexually abused 24 Eather is extremely low." He also concluded that "in contrast the 25 likelihood that she progressiVely rejected her father, based on her Of 2361'. or MD mm - 11m emotional identification with her 1nother;s hostility towards her "ather, is extremely?high." His recommendation was that the father (THEN-1110111211 to relinquish his parental rights and that any attempts with her father be abandoned." IV - no): Respondent's parents, - or VII i i The residential cont .13" non her father, and her antornal grandparentsp?whig? was 1terrupted by temporary orders 1' 1reviously entered in thlil?gumuc: eiuwlnund in other procneding?, .1111?qu Would resume, as indicated herei 151% ?if I ?it 1 $115 {153312.}! I 33f; If? 4:11"! The (1011.171: has the following . . of parental r1,ght5 between Rospon ont 1111313 aha Court does not consider a. reasonable optic?; (2) 1111.161 to be placed in the residential care of Re thumd period of time, initially with no contact between" . 1 nd her mother, thereafter, contact to be reinstituted on Iofexzed to herein as the (gimme; b' or (3) to allow a gradual reinstatement of the parent:? 1trically supervised basis, ?puroach; :hild relationship between Respondent and Resumption of ?Hunt?? 0? PACT, CONCLUSIONS MID ORDER. - 4 aid contact may be difficult for -. Gradual reinstatement on therapeutically au'pcrviaed basis would be in the best interest- II -, regarding limited issues to cw matters . Washington, shall be appointed as guardian ad lite '11 order to represent and protect interest ffactuate re3umPtion of residential contact between_ ather. The Guardian ad litem may employ such. mental health co n- salcrs and/oz: assistance as she deems appropriate to effectuate the FINDINGS 0' men ??1chst 0? AND ORDER. - 5 goal of resumPtion of residential contact between - and her 2 father. The architect of this plan shall be the Guardian Ad 12.1th :33: may include consultation with as apgropriate. XII has incurred reasonable guardian? ad litem fees $3,200.00. Said fee should be divided, with ing sixty-five percent of said fee and i ..thirty-five percent of said fee, with 20 of this proceeding. 23 The establishment of a close parent-child relationship 24 and should be promoted herein. 26 LIHDINUS 0? rant, COMMIIOHI Ol' OM33 Jundred Twenty and no/lOO Dollars 0 Based on the foregoing'Fihdings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, at is hereby . RDERED that Respondent a Motion for Reconsideration is denied; 0 .31ch 1313 further - . that shall be appointed guardian ad litem and the Court shall retain jurisdic- regarding limited issues to fulfill ORDERED that Respondent shall :69arding parenting issues; and it is furt 3 ORDERED that petitioner shall pay the sum er Dollars of said fees. A Judgment shall enter in favor of in said amounts; and it is further 74? My ?rmw? ??21 7'1, 57% mm (W - #?/w?wmw ?1'?de paid HIV-WW ,r/ir?ur/ (If PACT, n? 1.1" 3 ORDERED that this Order be entered mg 39 3111; effective - for all purposes except RAP and it is further ORDERED that each] party shall be and is hereby restrained from with the other and Respondent is restrained from having any ?except as approved by the Guardian ed Litem 4/ MW wait Ef??f??n 0570. . imam ?resented by: awed/Approved fer Entry: 13 'h I ween - Itturney for Petitioner- 21i\x v35 22 guardian La. 25 OF Pncr, CONCLUEIWI OF AND ORDER